UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-QSB
(X)
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934.
For
the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2005
( )
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934.
For the
transition period from ____________ to ____________
Commission
File No. 1-14778
DOR
BIOPHARMA, INC.
(Exact
name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE |
|
41-1505029 |
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification Number) |
|
|
|
1691
Michigan Ave., Suite 435
Miami,
FL |
|
33139 |
(Address
of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip
Code) |
|
(305)
534-3383 |
|
|
(Issuer’s
telephone number, including area code) |
|
Check
whether the issuer: (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2)
has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [
]
At May 9,
2005, 50,612,504 shares of the registrant's common stock (par value, $.001 per
share) were outstanding.
Transitional
Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes [ ] No [X]
Table
of Contents
Item |
Description |
Page |
|
|
|
Part
I |
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION |
|
1. |
Financial
Statements. |
3 |
2. |
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis. |
10 |
3. |
Controls
and Procedures. |
14 |
|
|
|
Part
II |
OTHER
INFORMATION |
|
4. |
Exhibits. |
15 |
PART
I. - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1 - FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
DOR
BioPharma, Inc.
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|
March
31, 2005 |
|
December
31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Assets
Current
assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
4,534,627 |
|
$ |
|
|
Accounts
receivable |
|
|
60,397 |
|
|
|
|
Prepaid
expenses |
|
|
94,279 |
|
|
|
|
Total
current assets |
|
|
4,689,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office
and laboratory equipment, net |
|
|
47,309 |
|
|
|
|
Intangible
assets, net |
|
|
2,002,763 |
|
|
|
|
Total
assets |
|
$ |
6,739,375 |
|
$ |
|
|
Liabilities
and shareholders’ equity
Current
liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
payable |
|
$ |
1,258,059 |
|
$ |
|
|
Accrued
royalties |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
Accrued
compensation and other expenses |
|
|
146,349 |
|
|
|
|
Notes
payable |
|
|
115,948 |
|
|
|
|
Total
current liabilities |
|
|
1,520,356 |
|
|
|
|
Shareholders’
equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock, $.001 par value. Authorized 4,600,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares;
none issued and outstanding |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Common
stock, $.001 par value. Authorized 100,000,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares;
50,612,504 and 42,418,404 issued and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
outstanding,
respectively |
|
|
50,612 |
|
|
|
|
Additional
paid-in capital |
|
|
86,472,888 |
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
deficit |
|
|
(80,876,784 |
) |
|
|
) |
|
|
|
5,646,716 |
|
|
|
|
Less
treasury stock (120,642 shares) |
|
|
(427,697 |
) |
|
|
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
shareholders’ equity |
|
|
5,219,019 |
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and shareholders’ equity |
|
$ |
6,739,375 |
|
$ |
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
DOR
BioPharma, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
For
the years ended March 31,
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues: |
|
$ |
113,540 |
|
$ |
66,095 |
|
Cost
of revenues |
|
|
(90,213 |
) |
|
(59,486 |
) |
Gross
profit |
|
|
23,327 |
|
|
6,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research
and development |
|
|
729,985 |
|
|
702,677 |
|
General
and administrative |
|
|
341,935 |
|
|
478,578 |
|
Total
operating expenses |
|
|
1,071,920 |
|
|
1,181,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from operations |
|
|
(1,048,593 |
) |
|
(1,174,646 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
incomes (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income |
|
|
21,596 |
|
|
17,277 |
|
Interest
expense |
|
|
(2,318 |
) |
|
(8,272 |
) |
Total
other income (expense) |
|
|
19,278 |
|
|
9,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss |
|
|
(1,029,315 |
) |
|
(1,165,641 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred
stock dividends |
|
|
- |
|
|
(503,195 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss applicable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
(1,029,315 |
) |
$ |
(1,668,836 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted net loss per share applicable to common
shareholders |
|
$ |
(
0.02 |
) |
$ |
(
0.05 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
46,974,194 |
|
|
36,796,223 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
DOR
BioPharma, Inc.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
For
the years ending March 31,
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
Operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss |
|
$ |
(1,029,315 |
) |
$ |
(1,165,641 |
) |
Adjustments
to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
and amortization |
|
|
65,517 |
|
|
137,738 |
|
Non-cash
stock option compensation |
|
|
(284,855 |
) |
|
- |
|
Change
in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts
receivable |
|
|
682,590 |
|
|
(66,096 |
) |
Prepaid
expenses |
|
|
(34,676 |
) |
|
90,152 |
|
Accounts
payable |
|
|
(563,776 |
) |
|
(120,402 |
) |
Total
adjustments |
|
|
(135,200 |
) |
|
41,392 |
|
Net
cash used by operating activities |
|
|
(1,164,515 |
) |
|
(1,124,249 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible
assets |
|
|
(182,349 |
) |
|
(128,750 |
) |
Purchases
of equipment |
|
|
(2,856 |
) |
|
(1,245 |
) |
Net
cash used by investing activities |
|
|
(185,205 |
) |
|
(129,995 |
) |
Financing
activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
3,552,157 |
|
|
3,045,500 |
|
Proceeds
from exercise of options |
|
|
-
|
|
|
61,972 |
|
Repayments
of amounts due under line of credit, notes payable and capital lease
obligations |
|
|
- |
|
|
(11,222 |
) |
Net
cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
3,552,157 |
|
|
3,096,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
2,202,437 |
|
|
1,842,006 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
2,332,190 |
|
|
4,117,540 |
|
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
4,534,627 |
|
$ |
5,959,546 |
|
Supplemental
disclosure of cash flow: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
paid for interest |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
3,383 |
|
Non-cash
transactions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash
stock options expense |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
467,183 |
|
Issuance
of preferred stock dividend in kind |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
503,195 |
|
Issuance
of common stock for intangible assets |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
32,778 |
|
Options
for increase in subsidiary ownership |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
88,740 |
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements
DOR
BioPharma, Inc.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
These
unaudited interim consolidated financial statements of DOR BioPharma, Inc. (“we”
or “us”) were prepared under the rules and regulations for reporting on Form
10-QSB. Accordingly, we omitted some information and note disclosures normally
accompanying the annual financial statements. You should read these interim
financial statements and notes in conjunction with our audited consolidated
financial statements and their notes included in our annual report on Form
10-KSB for the year ended December 31, 2004. In our opinion, the consolidated
financial statements include all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of
the results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the interim
periods. All adjustments were of a normal recurring nature. The results of
operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results for
the full fiscal year.
NET
LOSS PER SHARE
Net loss
per share is presented in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards (SFAS) No. 128 for the current and prior periods. We had a net loss
for all periods presented, which resulted in diluted and basic earnings per
share being the same for all of those periods presented. The potential impact of
warrants and stock options outstanding was not included in the calculation
because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive.
STOCK
BASED COMPENSATION
We have
stock-based employee compensation plans. SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for
Stock-Based Compensation,” encourages, but does not require companies to record
compensation cost for stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value. We
have chosen to continue using the intrinsic value method prescribed in
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees,” and related interpretations, in accounting for our stock option
plans.
We have
potential common stock equivalents related to our outstanding stock options.
These potential common stock equivalents were not included in diluted loss per
share because the effect would have been anti-dilutive. Accordingly, basic and
diluted loss per common share and the weighted average number of shares used in
the computations are the same for each of the periods presented. There were
options to purchase approximately 12.2 million and 7.5 million shares of our
common stock outstanding at March 31, 2005, and 2004, respectively.
Had
compensation cost been determined based upon the fair value at the grant date
for awards under the stock option plans based on the provisions of SFAS No. 123,
our pro forma net loss and net loss per share would have been as follows for the
three months ended:
March
31,
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net
Loss applicable to common shareholders |
|
|
|
|
|
As
reported |
$(1,029,315 |
) |
|
$(1,668,836 |
) |
Add
stock-based employee compensation expense related to stock options
determined under fair value method |
(91,197
|
) |
|
- |
|
Add
amounts charged to recovery of expense |
(284,855
|
) |
|
(575,817
|
) |
Pro
forma net loss according to SFAS 123 |
$
(1,405,367 |
) |
|
$ (
2,244,653 |
) |
Net
loss per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
As
reported, basic and diluted |
$
( 0.02 |
) |
|
$ (
0.05 |
) |
Pro
forma, basic and diluted |
$
( 0.03 |
) |
|
$ (
0.06 |
) |
The
weighted average fair value of options granted with an exercise price equal to
the fair market value of the stock was $0.49 and $0.49 for 2005 and 2004,
respectively.
The fair
value of options in accordance with SFAS 123 was estimated using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model and the following weighted-average
assumptions: dividend yield 0%, expected life of four years, volatility of 128%
and 129% in 2005 and 2004, respectively and average risk-free interest rates in
2005 and 2004 of 3.6% and 3.5%, respectively.
Stock
compensation expense for options granted to nonemployees has been determined in
accordance with SFAS 123 and Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) 96-18,
"Accounting for Equity Instruments That Are Issued to Other Than Employees for
Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services," and represents
the fair value of the consideration received, or the fair value of the equity
instruments issued, whichever may be more reliably measured. For options that
vest over future periods, the fair value of options granted to non-employees is
periodically remeasured as the options vest.
INTANGIBLE
ASSETS
Patent
costs, principally legal fees, are capitalized and, upon issuance of the patent,
are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the estimated useful
life of the patent or the regulatory life. Licenses of technology with
alternative future use are capitalized and are amortized on a straight-line
basis over the shorter of the estimated useful life or the regulatory life.
Licenses of technology with no alternative future use are expensed as incurred.
The useful lives of our patent and license costs at March 31, 2005 ranged from
11 to 16 years. The following is a summary of patent and license
assets:
|
Weighted
Average Amortization period
(years) |
Cost |
Accumulated
Amortization |
Net
Book Value |
March
31, 2005 |
10.7 |
$
2,792,368 |
$
789,605 |
$
2,002,763 |
December
31, 2004 |
10.6 |
$
2,611,195 |
$
728,741 |
$
1,882,454 |
Amortization
expense was $62,040 for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
Based on
the balance of the intangibles at March 31, 2005, the annual amortization
expense for each of the succeeding five years is estimated to be as follows:
|
Amortization
Amount |
2005 |
$
193,000 |
2006 |
173,000 |
2007 |
173,000 |
2008 |
173,000 |
2009 |
173,000 |
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
Office
and laboratory equipment, and intangible assets are evaluated and reviewed for
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company recognizes impairment of
long-lived assets in the event the net book value of such assets exceeds the
estimated future undiscounted cash flows attributable to such assets or the
business to which such assets relate. If the sum of the expected undiscounted
cash flows is less than the carrying value of the related asset or group of
assets, a loss is recognized for the difference between the fair value and the
carrying value of the related asset or group of assets. Such analyses
necessarily involve significant judgment.
NOTES
PAYABLE
Notes
payable were as follows:
|
March
31, 2005 |
|
December
31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
Note
payable to pharmaceutical company |
$
115,948 |
|
$
115,948 |
On June
29, 2002, DOR and a pharmaceutical company signed an agreement for the
dissolution of their joint ventures. Based on this agreement, DOR retained the
joint venture entities, InnoVaccines and Newco. In connection with the
settlement, the Company’s balance of $2,042,833 due to joint ventures at
December 31, 2001 was restructured into payments totaling $1,104,242: $524,500
paid immediately in cash and the remaining $579,742 payments of principal and
interest of $231,897 were due on June 30, 2003, $231,897 on June 30, 2004
and $115,948 on December 30, 2004, respectively.
The note
payable to a pharmaceutical company was not paid as of its due date at the end
of December 31, 2004. The note is in default.
BUSINESS
SEGMENTS
The
Company had two active segments for the three months ended March 31, 2005 and
2004: BioDefense and BioTherapeutics. Summary data for the three months
ended:
|
|
March
31, |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Net
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BioDefense |
|
$
113,540 |
|
|
$
66,095 |
|
BioTherapeutics |
|
-
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total |
|
$
113,540 |
|
|
$
66,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss
from Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BioDefense |
|
$(315,708
|
) |
|
$(246,784
|
) |
BioTherapeutics |
|
(285,754
|
) |
|
(364,893
|
) |
Corporate |
|
(447,131
|
) |
|
(562,969
|
) |
Total |
|
$(
1,048,593 |
) |
|
$(1,174,646
|
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation
Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BioDefense |
|
$
31,792 |
|
|
$
32,138 |
|
BioTherapeutics |
|
30,712
|
|
|
102,650
|
|
Corporate |
|
3,013
|
|
|
2,950
|
|
Total |
|
$
65,517 |
|
|
$ 137,738
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
31, 2005 |
|
|
December
31, 2004 |
|
Identifiable
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
BioDefense |
|
$
1,649,587 |
|
|
$
2,192,097 |
|
BioTherapeutics |
|
443,573
|
|
|
230,048
|
|
Corporate |
|
4,646,215
|
|
|
2,645,570
|
|
Total |
|
$
6,739,375 |
|
|
$
5,067,715 |
|
ITEM
2 - MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
The
following discussion and analysis provides information to explain our results of
operations and financial condition. You should also read our unaudited
consolidated interim financial statements and their notes included in this Form
10-QSB, and the our audited consolidated financial statements and their notes
and other information included in our Annual Report on Form 10-KSB for the year
ended December 31, 2004. This report contains forward-looking statements within
the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
which are subject to the safe-harbor created by that Section. Forward-looking
statements within this Form 10-QSB are identified by words such as “believes,”
“anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “may,” “will” “plans” and other similar
expression,
however,
these words are not the exclusive means of identifying such statements. In
addition, any statements that refer to expectations projections or other
characterizations of future events or circumstances are forward-looking
statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks,
uncertainties and other factors, including those identified in Exhibit 99.1
“Risk Factors” filed with this Form 10-QSB, which may cause actual results to
differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking
statements. Except
as expressly required by the federal securities laws,
we
undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking
statements to reflect events
or,
circumstances or
developments occurring
subsequent to the filing of this Form 10-QSB with the SEC
or
for any other reason and you should not place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements. You
should carefully review and consider the various disclosures the Company makes
in this report and our other reports filed with the SEC that attempt to advise
interested parties of the risks, uncertainties and other factors that may affect
our business.
Overview:
Business
Overview and Strategy
We are a
biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of biodefense vaccines and
oral therapeutic products intended for areas of unmet medical need. Our business
strategy is to (a) prepare the submission of a New Drug Application for
orBec®
with the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of acute Graft-versus-Host
Disease with gastrointestinal involvement; (b) evaluate and possibly initiate
additional clinical trials to explore the effectiveness of oral BDP
(orBec®) in
other therapeutic indications involving inflammatory conditions of the
gastrointestinal tract; (c) consider prophylactic use studies of
orBec®; (d)
identify a marketing and sales partner for orBec® in the
U.S. and abroad; (e) secure government funding for each of our biodefense
programs through grants and procurement contracts; (f) convert the biodefense
vaccine programs from early stage development to advanced development and
manufacturing; (g) transition the biodefense vaccine development programs from
academic institutions into commercial manufacturing facilities with the goal of
soliciting government contracts; (h) identify the development candidates for
botulinum therapeutic screening program; and (i) acquire or in-license new
clinical-stage compounds for development.
orBec®
In order
to accomplish our goal of a New Drug Application for orBec®
in 2005,
we are implementing a number of strategies aimed at improving our FDA approval
prospects. We have assembled an experienced team of employees and contractors
who are currently working on all aspects of the New Drug Application
preparation, including data management, data analysis, and biostatistics medical
writing. Manufacturing of the requisite batches of drug product (registration
batches) is ongoing and these batches are currently undergoing stability
testing.
We have
had strategic discussions with a number of pharmaceutical companies regarding
the partnering or sale of orBec®. It is
our intent to seek a marketing partner in the U.S. and abroad in anticipation of
commercialization of orBec®. We also
intend to seek a partner for the other potential indications of
orBec®.
RiVax™
The
scientific development of our ricin vaccine has progressed significantly in the
past year. With our partner the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center,
the initial goal was met for this program to file an Investigational New Drug
application with the FDA for the purposes of conducting a Phase I clinical trial
in healthy human volunteers. A Phase I safety and immunogenicity trial is
currently being conducted. The current vaccine is being developed for
intramuscular delivery. We are working on a formulation technology that could
permit the vaccine to be delivered nasally, with the objective of providing
immunity in the respiratory tract.
BT-VACC™
The
botulinum vaccine program has made important strides in the last year and we
have identified a lead antigen against one serotype (serotype A) of botulinum
toxin. We are in the process of validating the data and creating a multivalent
botulinum vaccine through a CRADA (Cooperative Research and Development
Agreement) with the U.S. Army and Thomas Jefferson University. To date much of
the work at Thomas Jefferson University has been funded by us, and we plan to
continue to fund the development of additional antigens against other serotypes
of botulinum toxin. In addition, we have applied for and intend to continue to
apply for research grants from the U.S. government to fund the transition of the
manufacturing of the lead antigen from the academic center to commercial
facilities. The goal of our biodefense program is to supply the United States
government with qualified countermeasures that will protect its citizens against
ricin toxin and botulinum toxin exposure.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Our
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are
based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and expenses,
and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going
basis, we evaluate these estimates and judgments. Currently, the most
significant estimate or judgment that we make is whether to capitalize or
expense patent and license costs. We make this judgment based on whether the
technology has alternative future uses, as defined in SFAS 2, "Accounting for
Research and Development Costs". Based on this consideration, we capitalized all
outside legal and filing costs incurred in the procurement of patents, as well
as amounts paid allowing us to license additional methods of vaccine delivery
through the Southern Research Institute patents, shares issued to acquire Élan’s
interest in the Innovaccine's Joint Venture, and amounts paid to University of
Texas Southwestern Medical Center allowing us the ability to license certain
patents related to a vaccine protecting against ricin toxin. These intangible
assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. If the sum of the
expected undiscounted cash flows is less than the carrying value of the related
asset or group of assets, a loss is recognized for the difference between the
fair value and the carrying value of the related asset or group of assets.
Material
Changes in Results of Operations
We are a
research and development company. For the three months ended March 31, 2005 we
had grant revenue of $113,540 as compared to $66,095 in the three months ended
March 31, 2004. We also incurred expenses related to that revenue in 2005 and
2004 of $90,213 and $59,486, respectively. The 2005 revenue and associated
expense was due to a National Institute of Health (NIH) Grant we received in
September 2004 and the 2004 revenue and associated expense was due to a Small
Business Innovation Research (SBIR) grant we received in September 2003 both for
further research associated with our ricin vaccine. The total amount of NIH
grant is $5,173,298 and the SBIR grant was $149,912.
For the
three months ended March 31, 2005, we had a net loss applicable to common
stockholders of $1,029,315 as compared to a $1,668,836 net loss applicable to
common stockholders for the three months ended March 31, 2004, a decrease of
$639,521, or 38%. Net loss applicable to common stockholders included the impact
of preferred stock dividends, which was zero in 2005, as compared to $503,195 in
2004. The decrease in preferred stock dividends was due to the conversion of all
outstanding Series C preferred stock to 1.25 million shares of common stock in
March 2004.
Research
and development spending increased $27,308, or 4%, to $729,985, for the three
months ended March 31, 2005 as compared to $702,677 for the corresponding period
ended March 31, 2004. This increase was a result of an increase in expenses
related to our ricin and botulinum programs.
General
and administrative expenses decreased $136,643, or 29%, to $341,935 for the
three months ended March 31, 2005, as compared to $478,578 for the corresponding
period ended March 31, 2004. This decrease is attributed to a recovery of stock
option expense for the variable accounting treatment of options for employees
under the stock option plan this recovery was $284,855. Netting out this
difference, overall there was an increase which is in part attributed to
increased legal costs for the financing completed and costs associated with
program management and corporate governance. In addition, there are more
administrative personnel than in the first three months of 2004.
Interest
and other income for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was $21,596 as
compared to $17,277 for the three months ended March 31, 2004, an increase of
$4,319 or 25%. This increase was primarily due to the increase in number of days
of available cash balances to earn interest from the completed financing in
February 8, 2005 compared to 2004, completed financing in March 12, 2004.
Interest
expense for the three months ended March 31, 2005 was $2,318 as compared to
$8,272 for the three months ended March 31, 2004, a decrease of $5,954 or 72%.
The decrease was due to a reduction in accrued interest expense related to the
decrease in the balance payable of our note payable.
FINANCIAL
CONDITION:
As of
March 31, 2005, we had cash and cash equivalents of $4,534,627 as compared to
$2,332,190 as of December 31, 2004 and working capital of $3,168,947 as compared
to $1,050,649 as of December 31, 2004. For the three months ended March 31,
2005, our cash used in operating activities was approximately $1.3 million,
versus approximately $1.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2004.
We expect
our research and development expenditures for 2005, under existing product
development agreements and license agreements pursuant to letters of intent and
option agreements, to approximate $2.9 million. We anticipate grant revenues to
offset manufacturing and research expenditures for the development of our ricin
vaccine in the amount of approximately $2.5 million, pending completion of
certain milestones.
As of
March 31, 2005, we had a note due of $115,948, which represents the remaining
amount payable to a pharmaceutical company in connection with our joint ventures
in which we were required to make payments of $231,897 in June 2004 and $115,948
in December 2004. As of the date of this report we have not made the final
payment. The note is in default.
The
following summarizes our contractual obligations at March 31, 2005, and the
effect those obligations are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flow in
future periods.
Contractual
Obligations |
Year
2005 |
Year
2006 |
Year
2007 |
Non-cancelable
obligations (1) |
$
66,914 |
$
52,628 |
- |
Debt
(2) |
115,948 |
- |
- |
TOTALS |
$
182,862 |
$
52,628 |
$
- |
(1) 3
year lease on corporate office entered into in 2003 and expiring in
2006
(2) Debt
consists of payment due to Élan as part of the dissolution of previous joint
ventures
In March
2004, we supplemented our cash position by the issuance and sale of 4,113,924
shares of our common stock at $0.79 per share in a private placement to
institutional investors. We also issued to such investors warrants to purchase
an aggregate of 1,645,570
shares of
our common stock at an exercise price of $0.87 per share. Our proceeds after
related expenses and closing costs, were approximately
$3.0 million.
In
February 2005, we further supplemented our cash position by the issuance and
sale of 8,396,100 shares of our common stock at $0.45 per share in a private
placement to institutional investors. Such investors also received warrants to
purchase an aggregate of 6,297,075 shares of our common stock at an exercise
price of $0.505 per share. Our proceeds after related expenses and closing
costs, were approximately $3.5 million. Based on our current rate of cash
outflows, we believe that our cash of $4,534,627 at March 31, 2005 will be
sufficient to meet our anticipated cash needs for working capital and capital
expenditures through the end of 2005. However, within the next six to twelve
months we will be required to secure cash in order to secure the required cash
flow for the next 12 months and avoid going
concern considerations. We anticipate that within this 12 month period it is
possible that in order to raise the required capital, we will seek additional
capital in the private and/or public equity markets to support our operations,
to respond to competitive pressures, to develop new products and services and to
support new strategic partnership expenditures. It is also possible that we
receive capital pursuant to one or more corporate partnerships relating to
orBec®. If we
receive additional funds through the issuance of equity or equity-linked
securities, stockholders may experience significant dilution and these equity
securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of our
common stock. The terms of any debt financing may contain restrictive covenants
which limit our ability to pursue certain courses of action. We may not be able
to obtain such financing on acceptable terms or at all. If we are unable to
obtain such financing when needed, or to do so on acceptable terms, we may be
unable to develop our products, take advantage of business opportunities,
respond to competitive pressures or continue our operations.
ITEM
3 -_CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Our Chief
Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer (the "Certifying Officers")
are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures. Such officers have concluded (based upon their evaluations of these
controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report) that
our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information
required to be disclosed by us in this report is accumulated and communicated to
management, including the Certifying Officers as appropriate, to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure.
The
Certifying Officers have also indicated that there were no significant changes
in our internal controls over financial reporting or other factors that could
significantly affect such controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation,
and there were no significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.
Our
management, including the Certifying Officers, does not expect that our
disclosure controls or our internal controls will prevent all error and all
fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide
only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control
system are met. In addition, the design of a control system must reflect the
fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be
considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all
control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that
all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been
detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple
error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual
acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management
override of the control. The design of any systems of controls is also based in
part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there
can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals
under all potential future conditions. Because of these inherent limitations in
a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur
and may not be detected.
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION.
ITEM
4 - EXHIBITS
31.1 Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act rule 13(a)-14(a) (under
Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002)
31.2 Certification
of
Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to Exchange Act rule 13(a)-14(a) (under Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002).
32.1 Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
32.2 Certification
of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.
99.1 Risk
Factors
______________
Reports
on Form 8-K:
We filed
a Current Report on Form 8-K on March 14, 2005 announcing the press release
issued for the results of operations for the fourth quarter 2004.
We filed
a Current Report on Form 8-K on February 9, 2005 announcing the completed
issuance and sale of 8,396,100 shares of common stock at $0.45 and that the
investors also received warrants to purchase an aggregate of 6,297,075 shares of
common stock at $.505.
We filed
a Current Report on Form 8-K on February 3, 2005 announcing that we had entered
into a Securities Purchase Agreement for the sale of 8,396,100 shares of common
stock at $0.45 and that the investors also received warrants to purchase an
aggregate of 6,297,075 shares of common stock at $.505.
We filed
a Current Report on Form 8-K on January 25, 2005 announcing the acceptance of
the compliance plan by the American Stock Exchange and the extension to gain
compliance until July 12, 2005.
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
DOR
BIOPHARMA, INC.
May 16, 2005 by
/s/
Michael T. Sember
Michael
T. Sember
President
and Interim
Chief
Executive Officer
May 16, 2005 by
/s/
Evan Myrianthopoulos
Evan
Myrianthopoulos
Chief
Financial Officer