AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISION ON APRIL 28, 2006
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
(Mark One)
o REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OR (g) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
OR
o SHELL COMPANY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number 1-14868
BUNZL PLC
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
ENGLAND
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
110 Park Street, London WIK 6NX
(Address of principal executive offices)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act.
Title of each class |
|
Name of exchange on which registered |
Ordinary Shares of 321¤7 pence each |
|
The New York Stock Exchange* |
*Traded in the form of American Depositary Receipts
evidencing American Depositary
Shares representing such ordinary shares.
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act. None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act: None
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period covered by the annual report: 346,584,130
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes x No o
If this report is an annual or transition report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer x Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark which financial statement items the registrant has elected to follow:
Item 17 x Item 18 o
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No x
|
Page |
||
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
Item 1. Identity of Directors, Senior Management and Advisers |
|
3 |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
|
45 |
|
Item 12. Description of Securities other than Equity Securities |
|
47 |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Item 14. Material Modifications to the Rights of Security Holders and Use of Proceeds |
|
48 |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
|
48 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
Item 16D. Exemptions from the Listing Standards for Audit Committees |
|
49 |
|
Item 16E. Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchases |
|
49 |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
ii
In this Annual Report on Form 20-F (the Annual Report), the term the Company or Bunzl refers to Bunzl public limited company, alone or together with its subsidiary undertakings, as the context so permits. The term Group refers to Bunzl together with its subsidiary undertakings. The Companys fiscal year ends on December 31. References in this Annual Report to a particular year are to the fiscal year unless otherwise indicated.
In this Annual Report, the term ordinary shares or shares refers to ordinary shares of 321¤7 pence each of the Company, and the term ADSs refers to American depositary shares each representing five ordinary shares and evidenced by American depositary receipts (ADRs).
The Companys consolidated financial statements (the Consolidated Financial Statements) for 2005 and 2004 that form part of this Annual Report are presented in pounds sterling and are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted for use in the EU, which differ in certain respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (US GAAP). The principal differences between IFRS and US GAAP affecting the Group are explained in Note 31 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-45 of this Annual Report.
IFRS as adopted by the EU differ in certain respects from IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standard Board (IASB). However, the Consolidated Financial Statements for the periods presented would be no different had the Company applied IFRS as issued by the IASB. References to IFRS hereafter should be construed as references to IFRS as adopted by the EU.
Where relevant the comparative information for 2004 and prior years has been restated for the Bunzl share consolidation following the demerger of the Filtrona business on June 6, 2005 (using a ratio of seven new Bunzl shares of 321/7p each for nine old Bunzl shares of 25p each).
In this Annual Report, references to US dollar(s), US$ or $ are to currency of the United States (US) and references to pound(s) sterling, sterling, £, pence or p are to currency of the United Kingdom (UK). Solely for convenience, this Annual Report contains translations of certain pound sterling amounts into US dollars at specified rates. These translations should not be construed as representations that the pound sterling amounts represent such US dollar amounts or could be converted into US dollars at the rates indicated. The following tables show for the periods and dates indicated certain information concerning the US dollar exchange rate for pounds sterling based on the noon buying rate in New York City for cable transfers in pounds sterling as announced for customs purposes by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the Noon Buying Rate). On April 11, 2006, the Noon Buying Rate was $1.75 to £1.00.
|
|
Noon Buying Rate |
|
||||||||||
|
|
Period end |
|
Average(1) |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
||||
|
|
(dollars per pound sterling) |
|
||||||||||
Period Ended December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
1.45 |
|
|
|
1.44 |
|
|
1.50 |
|
1.37 |
|
2002 |
|
|
1.61 |
|
|
|
1.51 |
|
|
1.61 |
|
1.41 |
|
2003 |
|
|
1.78 |
|
|
|
1.64 |
|
|
1.78 |
|
1.55 |
|
2004 |
|
|
1.92 |
|
|
|
1.84 |
|
|
1.95 |
|
1.75 |
|
2005 |
|
|
1.72 |
|
|
|
1.81 |
|
|
1.93 |
|
1.71 |
|
2006(2) |
|
|
1.75 |
|
|
|
1.75 |
|
|
1.79 |
|
1.73 |
|
1
Month Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.79 |
|
1.75 |
|
November 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.78 |
|
1.71 |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.77 |
|
1.72 |
|
January 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.79 |
|
1.74 |
|
February 28, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.78 |
|
1.73 |
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.76 |
|
1.73 |
|
(1) The average of the Noon Buying Rates on the last day of each full month during the relevant period.
(2) January 1 through April 11, 2006.
For the preparation and consolidation of financial information in this Annual Report, the year end exchange rates used by Bunzl for translating US dollars into pounds sterling for the years 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 were, respectively, $1.46, $1.61, $1.79, $1.92 and $1.72 to £1.00 and the average exchange rates used for the years 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 were, respectively, $1.44, $1.51, $1.64, $1.82 and $1.81 to £1.00.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE SAFE HARBOR PROVISIONS OF THE UNITED STATES PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
This Annual Report contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. A number of factors could cause actual results, performance or achievements of the Group or industry results to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following: (i) changes in demand for the Groups products worldwide; (ii) changes in the costs of raw materials; (iii) changes in the pound sterling/dollar exchange rate and the exchange rates between pounds sterling and other currencies in which the Groups businesses operate; (iv) changes in the political or fiscal regime of Bunzls areas of activity; (v) principal changes in UK and US tax legislation or similar laws or regulations; (vi) cost inflation within the industrial sectors and economies in which Bunzl operates; (vii) changes in environmental legislation; (viii) changes in UK and US LIBOR rates and (ix) the risk factors identified in Item 3. Key InformationRisk Factors. The foregoing list of factors should not be construed as exhaustive. Forward-looking statements can be identified by, among other things, the use of forward-looking terminology such as believes, expects, may, will, should, seeks, pro forma, anticipates or intends or the negative of any thereof, or other variations thereon or comparable terminology, or by discussions of strategy or intentions. Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report include, but are not limited to, certain statements under (i) Item 3. Key InformationRisk Factors, (ii) Item 4. Information on the CompanyBusiness Overview and Properties, (iii) Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects, (iv) Item 8. Financial InformationConsolidated Statements and Other Financial Information - Legal Proceedings, and (v) Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RiskCredit Risk. Such forward-looking statements are necessarily dependent upon assumptions, estimates and dates that may be incorrect or imprecise and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors. Accordingly, any forward-looking statements included herein do not purport to be predictions of future events or circumstances and may not be realized. Due to such uncertainties and risks, readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof.
2
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not applicable.
The data presented below under the caption Selected Financial Data is derived from the published consolidated financial statements of the Group which have been audited by KPMG Audit Plc, independent registered public accounting firm. The results are for continuing operations and, as a result of the demerger of the Filtrona business area in June 2005, Filtronas contribution to profits is included as a single line net of interest, tax and the costs of effecting the demerger and presented as discontinued operations.
The Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with IFRS which differ in certain respects from US GAAP. The principal differences between IFRS and US GAAP affecting the Group are explained in Note 31 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-45 of this Annual Report.
IFRS as adopted by the EU differ in certain respects from IFRS as issued by the IASB. However, the Consolidated Financial Statements for the periods presented would be no different had the Company applied IFRS as issued by the IASB. References to IFRS hereafter should be construed as references to IFRS as adopted by the EU.
Under the IFRS transition provisions within the US Securities and Exchange Commissions (SEC) Form 20-F requirements, the Group is permitted to provide two years of comparable financial information under IFRS and reconciliations to US GAAP for the periods presented. In addition, the Group is providing selected financial US GAAP information for five years.
The Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2005 and 2004, and for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2005, and the reports thereon, are included in this Annual Report.
Where relevant the comparative information has been restated for the Bunzl share consolidation following the demerger of the Filtrona business on June 6, 2005 (using a ratio of seven new Bunzl shares of 321¤7p each for nine old Bunzl shares of 25p each).
3
|
|
for the year ended |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Amounts in accordance with IFRS |
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
Existing businesses |
|
2,808.3 |
|
2,438.5 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
116.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
2,924.4 |
|
2,438.5 |
|
Operating profit |
|
187.5 |
|
161.1 |
|
Finance income |
|
22.0 |
|
17.0 |
|
Finance cost |
|
(32.8 |
) |
(19.9 |
) |
Profit before income tax |
|
176.7 |
|
158.2 |
|
Income tax |
|
(56.7 |
) |
(52.5 |
) |
Profit for the year |
|
120.0 |
|
105.7 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year |
|
4.2 |
|
35.7 |
|
Total profit for the year |
|
124.2 |
|
141.4 |
|
Attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the Company |
|
123.6 |
|
140.2 |
|
Minority interests |
|
0.6 |
|
1.2 |
|
Total profit for the year |
|
124.2 |
|
141.4 |
|
Earnings per share of the total profit for the year attributable to the Companys equity holders |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
36.5 |
p |
40.7 |
p |
Diluted |
|
36.3 |
p |
40.5 |
p |
Earnings per share of the profit for the year from continuing operations attributable to the Companys equity holders |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
35.4 |
p |
30.7 |
p |
Diluted |
|
35.2 |
p |
30.5 |
p |
Dividends per share |
|
15.7 |
p |
13.3 |
p |
Weighted average ordinary shares |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (million)* |
|
338.8 |
|
344.6 |
|
Diluted (million)* |
|
340.5 |
|
345.9 |
|
* The comparative information and 2005 prior to June 6, 2005 has been restated for the Bunzl share consolidation following the demerger of the Filtrona business on June 6, 2005 (using a ratio of seven new Bunzl shares of 321¤7p each for nine old Bunzl shares of 25p each).
4
|
|
for the year ended December 31 |
|
||||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Amounts in accordance with US GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
2,924.4 |
|
2,438.5 |
|
2,275.6 |
|
2,231.2 |
|
2,129.1 |
|
Net income for the financial year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
112.1 |
|
101.2 |
|
93.3 |
|
91.0 |
|
70.1 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
5.7 |
|
33.0 |
|
38.4 |
|
56.8 |
|
32.3 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting policy net of tax on adoption of SFAS 123R |
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net income for the financial year |
|
117.8 |
|
131.7 |
|
131.7 |
|
147.8 |
|
102.4 |
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
33.1 |
p |
29.4 |
p |
26.4 |
p |
25.4 |
p |
19.7 |
p |
Discontinued operations |
|
1.7 |
p |
9.5 |
p |
10.8 |
p |
15.8 |
p |
9.0 |
p |
Cumulative effect of change in accounting policy net of tax on adoption of SFAS 123R |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
)p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share |
|
34.8 |
p |
38.2 |
p |
37.2 |
p |
41.2 |
p |
28.7 |
p |
Continuing operations |
|
32.9 |
p |
29.0 |
p |
26.0 |
p |
25.0 |
p |
19.4 |
p |
Discontinued operations |
|
1.7 |
p |
9.4 |
p |
10.7 |
p |
15.5 |
p |
8.9 |
p |
Cumulative effect of change in accounting policy net of taxation adoption of SFAS 123R |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
)p |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
34.6 |
p |
37.7 |
p |
36.7 |
p |
40.5 |
p |
28.3 |
p |
Dividends paid per share |
|
14.05 |
p |
12.4 |
p |
11.4 |
p |
10.6 |
p |
9.75 |
p |
Weighted average ordinary shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic (million)* |
|
338.8 |
|
344.6 |
|
354.0 |
|
358.9 |
|
356.7 |
|
Diluted (million)* |
|
340.5 |
|
349.5 |
|
358.6 |
|
364.5 |
|
362.3 |
|
* The comparative information and 2005 prior to June 6, 2005 has been restated for the Bunzl share consolidation following the demerger of the Filtrona business on June 6, 2005 (using a ratio of seven new Bunzl shares of 321¤7 p each for nine old Bunzl shares of 25p each).
|
|
at December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts in accordance with IFRS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
792.3 |
|
869.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
800.1 |
|
851.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
1,592.4 |
|
1,720.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
(518.8 |
) |
(478.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
(613.2 |
) |
(753.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests |
|
|
|
(3.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders funds: equity interests |
|
460.4 |
|
484.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
at December 31 |
|
||||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Amounts in accordance with US GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders funds: equity interests |
|
603.4 |
|
716.7 |
|
712.2 |
|
741.8 |
|
714.1 |
|
Share capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock (£m) |
|
111.4 |
|
112.5 |
|
112.1 |
|
116.8 |
|
116.0 |
|
Number of shares (million)* |
|
346.6 |
|
350.0 |
|
348.7 |
|
363.2 |
|
360.8 |
|
* The comparative information and 2005 prior to June 6, 2005 has been restated for the Bunzl plc share consolidation following the demerger of the Filtrona business on June 6, 2005 (using a ratio of seven new Bunzl shares of 321¤7 p each for nine old Bunzl shares of 25p each).
6
Investors, holders and prospective purchasers of ADSs should carefully consider the risk factors discussed below as well as the other information included in this Annual Report (including, without limitation, the Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the Safe Harbor Provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects). Bunzls business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially affected by any or all of these risks or by other risks that Bunzl cannot presently identify.
Bunzl may be adversely affected by fluctuations in exchange and interest rates
Bunzl may be adversely affected by fluctuations in exchange rates. The results of Bunzls operations are accounted for in pounds sterling but the majority of the Groups sales are made and income earned in US dollars and other foreign currencies. Movements in exchange rates used to translate foreign currencies into pounds sterling may have a significant impact on Bunzls reported results of operations from year to year.
Bunzl may also be adversely impacted by fluctuations in interest rates, mainly through an increased interest expense. See Item 11. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RiskInterest Rate Risk.
Bunzl faces competition that may reduce its market share and growth potential
Bunzl faces competition from international companies as well as local and regional companies in the countries in which it operates. In addition, many of Bunzls customers have chosen to source products from Bunzl as they have looked to outsourced solutions to service their own requirements. If this trend was reversed and customers decided to satisfy their requirements themselves or source products directly from manufacturers or other suppliers, this could result in a loss of business and a resulting adverse effect on Bunzls operating results. Increased competition and unanticipated actions by competitors or customers could lead to downward pressure on prices and/or a decline in Bunzls market share in any of Bunzls businesses which would adversely affect Bunzls results and hinder its growth potential.
Bunzls growth is partly dependent on the ability to complete acquisitions and successfully integrate operations of acquired businesses
A significant portion of Bunzls historical growth has been achieved through acquisitions of businesses and the Groups growth strategy includes additional acquisitions. There can be no assurance that Bunzl will be able to make acquisitions in the future or that any acquisitions Bunzl does make will be successful.
Bunzl makes acquisitions with the expectation that these acquisitions will result in benefits to the Group. Achieving these benefits depends on the timely, efficient and successful execution of a number of post acquisition events, often including integrating the business of the acquired company into Bunzls purchasing programs, distribution network, marketing programs and reporting and management information systems. In general Bunzl cannot offer assurances that it will be able to successfully integrate the acquired companys operations or personnel or realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition. The ability to integrate acquisitions may be adversely affected by many factors, including the relative size of a business and the allocation of the Groups limited management resources among various integration efforts.
The results of operations may be adversely affected by expenses Bunzl incurs in making acquisitions, by amortization of acquisition related intangible assets with definite lives and by additional depreciation expenses attributable to acquired assets. Any of the businesses Bunzl acquires may also have liabilities or adverse operating issues, including some that Bunzl fails to discover before the acquisition. Additionally,
7
Bunzls ability to make future acquisitions may depend upon obtaining additional financing. There can be no assurance that the Group will be able to obtain additional financing on acceptable terms.
Managing Bunzls growth may be difficult and the Groups growth rate may decline
Bunzl has expanded its operations over recent years. This growth has placed significant demands on the Groups managerial, administrative and operational resources. Bunzl cannot be sure that this growth will continue. To the extent that the Groups customer base and services continue to grow, this growth is expected to place a significant demand on Bunzls managerial, administrative and operational resources. The future performance and results of operations will depend in part on Bunzls ability to successfully implement enhancements to the Groups business management systems and to adapt those systems as necessary to respond to changes in the business. Similarly, the Groups growth has created a need for expansion of its facilities from time to time. As Bunzl nears maximum utilization of a given facility, operations may be constrained and inefficiencies may be created, which could adversely affect operating results unless the facility is expanded or volume is shifted to another facility. Conversely, as additional facilities are added or existing facilities expanded, excess capacity may be created. Any excess capacity may also create inefficiencies and adversely affect the operating results.
Bunzls operating results may be adversely affected by increased costs, shortages of purchased products or labor, or disruption to distribution facilities
Many of the products the Group supplies have a significant plastic and/or paper content. As a consequence movements in natural gas, oil and pulp prices as well as other raw material prices may affect the cost of the products purchased by the Group. If commodity price changes result in unexpected increases in the cost of Bunzls purchased products, Bunzl may not be able to increase its prices to offset these costs without suffering reduced volume, revenue and operating income. Bunzl may also be adversely affected by shortages of such purchased products.
Similarly, Bunzls operating results could be adversely affected by labor or skill shortages or increased labor costs due to increased competition for employees, higher employee turnover or increased employee benefit costs.
Bunzl would be affected if there was a catastrophic failure of its major distribution facilities or supply chain. In addition, the maintenance and development of information systems may result in systems failures which may adversely affect business operations.
Product liability claims could have an adverse effect on the Groups business
Like any other distributor of products, Bunzl faces an inherent risk of exposure to product liability claims if the products Bunzl sells, or the products sold by companies acquired by Bunzl, cause injury or illness. The Group may be subject to liability, which could be substantial, because of actual or alleged contamination in products sold by Bunzl or by companies Bunzl has acquired, including products sold by those companies before Bunzl acquired them. Bunzl has, and management believes that the companies Bunzl has acquired have had, liability insurance with respect to certain product liability claims. However, there can be no guarantee that this insurance will continue to be available at reasonable cost or at all, or will be adequate to cover product liability claims against Bunzl, or companies Bunzl has acquired. If Bunzl or any of the Bunzl acquired companies do not have adequate insurance, product liability claims and costs associated with product recalls, including a loss of business, could have a material adverse effect on the Groups business, operating results and financial condition.
8
Bunzls business may be adversely impacted by unfavorable economic conditions or other developments and risks in the countries in which it operates
Bunzls business is somewhat dependent on general economic conditions in the US, the UK, France and other important markets. A significant deterioration in these conditions, including a reduction in consumer spending levels, could have an adverse effect on Bunzls business and results of operations. Bunzls businesses are involved in the distribution of products which is a business characterized by a high volume of sales with relatively low profit margins. A significant portion of Bunzls sales is at prices that are based on product cost plus a percentage markup. Accordingly the results of operations may be negatively impacted when the price of products goes down, even when the percentage markup remains constant. In addition, Bunzl may be adversely affected by political and economic developments in any of the countries where Bunzl has distribution networks. Bunzls operations are also subject to a variety of other risks and uncertainties relating to trading in numerous foreign countries, including political or economic upheaval, the imposition of any import or investment restrictions, including tariffs and import quotas or any restrictions on the repatriation of earnings and capital, and changes in tax regulation and international tax treaties.
In addition, Bunzls operating results are sensitive to, and may be materially adversely impacted by, difficulties with the collectibility of accounts receivable, inventory control, price pressures, severe weather conditions and increases in wages or other labor costs, energy costs and fuel or other transportation related costs. There can be no assurance that one or more of these factors will not adversely affect the future operating results.
Bunzl may be adversely affected by government regulations
Bunzls operations are affected by various statutes, regulations and laws in the countries and markets in which it operates. The Group is subject to various laws applicable to businesses generally, including laws affecting land usage, zoning, environment, health and safety, labor and employment practices, competition and other matters. Bunzl cannot predict whether future developments in laws and regulations concerning its businesses will affect its earnings in a materially adverse manner or whether its operating units will be successful in meeting future demands of regulatory agencies in a manner which will not materially adversely affect Bunzls business, financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
Bunzl had its origins in Bratislava, Slovakia, in the middle of the nineteenth century. The headquarters moved to London and the Company was incorporated in England in 1940, gaining a listing on the London Stock Exchange as a public company in 1957.
In the early 1980s there were significant changes to the Group. Its Austrian paper mills were sold and it embarked on a strategy of expanding into outsourcing services in the US and into paper distribution in the UK. In the mid to late 1980s the Group diversified into many other businesses including parcel and goods transportation in the UK and building products distribution in the US. During the 1990s the Group disposed of a number of businesses, focusing on those businesses which reflected the Groups evolution towards outsourcing and its increasing service orientation.
In 2002 the final break with the paper industry occurred when the Paper Distribution business area was sold. Following this disposal the Group was reorganized in August 2002 into two business areas: Outsourcing Services and an enlarged Filtrona (comprising the businesses of the former Filtrona and Plastics business areas).
9
In June 2005 the Group demerged Filtrona, its speciality plastic and fiber products business, into a separate listed company. As a result, Bunzl has become a focused, international distribution and outsourcing Group organized into four business areas: North America, UK & Ireland, Continental Europe and Australasia.
The Company has grown by following a strategy of expanding in those areas where it can build its international competitive position through both organic growth and acquisitions combined with the disposal of lower margin, lower growth businesses. This evolution gave the Group an increasing focus on higher return, higher growth businesses which became increasingly international and service oriented. The pursuit of this strategy resulted in Bunzl having two business streams, Outsourcing Services and Filtrona, both of which had superior returns, good international competitive positions and potential to grow but which had little or no commercial overlap between them. Bunzl therefore decided to separate these two fundamentally different component parts by demerging Filtrona from the Group in June 2005. Effective as of the date of the demerger, Filtrona became an independent public company while Bunzl became a simpler organization concentrating on the Outsourcing Services business stream as a focused, international distribution and outsourcing Group.
Bunzls organic growth has been the result of a consistent emphasis on market focus, service orientation and efficiency. To supplement this organic growth, the Group has made a number of strategic acquisitions. Through this strategy Bunzl aims to strengthen its position in targeted regions and market segments, increase Bunzls presence in established markets and develop Bunzls offering in new and developing markets and geographies. Details of significant acquisitions in continuing operations within the last five years are outlined below. Over the last five years revenue from continuing operations (including acquisitions) has increased from £2,129 million in 2001 to £2,924 million in 2005.
In February 2001 ICCS MacGregor, a distributor of supplies to hotels, nursing homes and contract cleaners in Scotland, was added to the Groups business in the UK. In June 2001 the business in North America was extended with the acquisition of Godin which supplies supermarkets, food processors and industrial companies in Quebec. In July 2001 the Groups European retail supply business was expanded by acquiring the UK carrier bag supply business from BPI thus building on the Groups international sourcing operations. The Group completed a number of transactions in October 2001. It acquired Eastern Paper which supplies supermarkets, redistributors and food processors in the Maritimes thus completing the Groups geographic coverage of Canada. In Europe the Group acquired the DKI Group which supplies packaging consumables and equipment to the Danish supermarket and food processing industries, strengthening the Groups position in the Scandinavian market. In a move to strengthen the Groups position supplying the US food processor industry it purchased Packers, a long established supplier to the beef and pork processing industries based in Omaha, Nebraska. In November 2001 the Group further expanded in Europe with the acquisition of W A Blyth, a distributor of personal protection equipment and cleaning and hygiene supplies in Wales and South West England.
The Group bought Lockhart in May 2002. Lockhart is one of the UKs leading suppliers of catering equipment to the foodservice industry including hotels, caterers, restaurants, retailers and the licensed trade. In late June 2002 the Group acquired Kenco in Seattle. Kenco is a redistribution business which strengthened the position of the Groups business in the Pacific Northwest of the US. In the last two months of 2002 the Group announced four acquisitions which added to its business in different parts of the world. In early November 2002 Lesnies, a distributor of supplies to food processors and retailers based in Sydney, Australia, was acquired. This expanded the Groups position in Australasia. In November 2002, the Group agreed to purchase Darenas, a UK national distributor of cleaning and hygiene supplies, and
10
completed shortly thereafter. In December 2002, the Group acquired Saxton, a US redistribution business based in Phoenix with locations also in Kansas City and Denver, which strengthened the Groups position both in cleaning and hygiene and in the relevant regions. In late December 2002 the Group purchased Thomas McLaughlin, a leading distributor of catering equipment in both Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. McLaughlin was a logical extension of the Groups existing business in Ireland and complemented the acquisition of Lockhart earlier in the year.
In February 2003 the Group purchased Enterprise, a distributor of plant supplies to food processors in Dallas, Texas; Greeley, Colorado; Atlanta, Georgia and St Joseph, Missouri. Also in October 2003 the Group bought MultiLine, a distributor of a wide range of consumables to the Danish hotel and catering industries. In December 2003 the Group purchased Prolix Packaging, a retail stores supply distributor based in Chicago, Illinois, and OMahony Packaging, a distributor of supplies to retailers and food processors based in Cork, Ireland.
In May 2004 Bunzl acquired Groupe Pierre Le Goff. This significant acquisition took Bunzl into France. A strong position in France complemented the Groups existing European positions in the UK, Benelux, Germany, Denmark and Ireland and provided a platform to develop further in France and Southern Europe. During the fourth quarter of 2004 the Group acquired three companies in North America. In October 2004 the Group reinforced its position in the growing convenience store segment through the acquisition of TSN. Headquartered in Denver, Colorado, TSN is a distributor of goods not for resale to convenience stores across the US. In November 2004 the Group purchased Joseph Weil & Sons. Based in Chicago, Weil supplies janitorial/sanitation (jan/san) businesses, disposable foodservice and non-food retail products in the Midwest, complements the Groups position there and provides an opportunity to develop further into these markets. In December 2004 the Group further expanded with the acquisition of TEMO. Located in Maspeth, New York City, TEMO is a well-established redistribution business in the Northeast distributing foodservice and jan/san products. In October 2004 the Group acquired the disposable consumables and packaging distribution business of Cospak in Australia. Based in Newcastle, New South Wales and Perth, the Cospak business complemented Bunzls existing Australian business. In November 2004 the Group made its first acquisition in Eastern Europe with the purchase of Beltex, which is a national distributor in Hungary with additional branches in neighboring Romania and Slovakia. Beltexs product range encompasses cleaning and hygiene supplies and has recently expanded into safety supplies and personal protection equipment.
In January 2005, Bunzl completed the acquisition of Gelpa. Based in Arnhem, Gelpa is a distributor principally supplying the retail and food processor sectors with packaging and consumables in the Netherlands. Following the acquisition of Beltex, Bunzl continued its expansion into Central Europe with the acquisition of Tecep in July 2005. Tecep has operations in Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania and Poland, primarily serving the retail, foodservice, catering and food processor markets with packaging supplies and catering and food processing equipment. In July Bunzl also purchased Sanicare, strengthening its position in the healthcare sector in Australia and New Zealand. Based in New South Wales, Sanicare supplies disposable products principally into the healthcare sector. In September the acquisition of SOFCO based in New York State was completed. SOFCO distributes disposable supplies to a number of sectors including grocery, foodservice and healthcare. At the end of September A W Mendenhall based in Chicago was acquired. Mendenhall serves the redistribution sector principally supplying foodservice, janitorial, industrial packaging and disposable products in the Midwest. In October the Groups position in the non-food retail sector was strengthened with the purchase of Retail Resources, a business based in New York providing distribution services to retail stores across the US including store supplies such as checkout and merchandise bags, jan/san items, labels, boxes and other paper products as well as specialized expense control systems. The grocery and food processor distribution business of Weiss Brothers, based in West Point, Pennsylvania, was also acquired in October.
11
In January 2006 Bunzl acquired Midshires, a UK vending machine and supplies business, and Master Craft, a US business servicing the redistribution and foodservice sectors. In April 2006 Bunzl announced the acquisitions of Allcare, a distributor of personal protection equipment and disposable products to food processors in Australia, and Picardie Hygiene, a distributor of cleaning and hygiene products in Northeast France.
The Company is a holding company conducting its operations through its subsidiary undertakings. The Group is an international group of companies involved in the provision of value-added distribution and outsourcing services. As of December 31, 2005, the Group had approximately 10,500 employees in approximately 350 locations in 17 countries.
The Companys shares are quoted on the London Stock Exchange and the ADSs are quoted on the New York Stock Exchange. Its principal executive offices are located at 110 Park Street, London, W1K 6NX (telephone number 011-44-20-7495-4950; fax number 011-44-20-7495-4953; website www.bunzl.com).
The Groups operations are organized primarily by international line of business into four business areas. A segment analysis of the results of these business areas is set out in Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-14 of this Annual Report and is discussed in the following pages.
The table below sets out selected financial and other information for the Group for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2005.
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations (£m) |
|
2,924.4 |
|
2,438.5 |
|
Operating profit |
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing operations (£m) |
|
187.5 |
|
161.1 |
|
Operating profit margin from continuing operations (%) |
|
6.4 |
|
6.6 |
|
Employees (continuing operations) |
|
10,526 |
|
9,455 |
|
Explanation of trends
The Group produced good results in 2005 with continuing operations revenue and operating profit ahead of 2004 due to a combination of organic growth and acquisition activity. Currency translation had a marginally favourable impact in 2005, increasing continuing operations revenue by £22.9 million, or 0.8%, and continuing operations operating profit by £1.5 million, or 0.7%.
In 2005, following the demerger of Filtrona, the Group reorganized itself into four geographical segments; North America, UK & Ireland, Continental Europe and Australasia. These geographical locations are consistent with the geographical markets served by the Group.
North America
The table below sets out selected financial and other information for North America as of and for each of the two years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Revenue from continuing operations (£m) |
|
1,665.2 |
|
1,412.9 |
|
Operating profit from continuing operations (£m) |
|
113.6 |
|
104.7 |
|
Operating profit margin from continuing operations (%) |
|
6.8 |
|
7.4 |
|
Employees (continuing operations) |
|
3,454 |
|
2,802 |
|
12
UK & Ireland
The table below sets out selected financial and other information for UK & Ireland as of and for each of the two years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Revenue from continuing operations (£m) |
|
664.2 |
|
638.9 |
|
Operating profit from continuing operations (£m) |
|
55.8 |
|
51.0 |
|
Operating profit margin from continuing operations (%) |
|
8.4 |
|
8.0 |
|
Employees (continuing operations) |
|
3,780 |
|
3,742 |
|
Continental Europe
The table below sets out selected financial and other information for Continental Europe as of and for each of the two years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Revenue from continuing operations (£m) |
|
490.0 |
|
308.3 |
|
Operating profit from continuing operations (£m) |
|
25.3 |
|
13.0 |
|
Operating profit margin from continuing operations (%) |
|
5.2 |
|
4.2 |
|
Employees (continuing operations) |
|
2,794 |
|
2,476 |
|
Australasia
The table below sets out selected financial and other information for Australasia as of and for each of the two years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Revenue from continuing operations (£m) |
|
105.0 |
|
78.4 |
|
Operating profit from continuing operations (£m) |
|
7.8 |
|
6.3 |
|
Operating profit margin from continuing operations (%) |
|
7.4 |
|
8.0 |
|
Employees (continuing operations) |
|
438 |
|
373 |
|
Activities
Bunzl provides a broad range of products including grocery store supplies, foodservice packaging, catering equipment, cleaning and hygiene products, personal protection equipment and disposable healthcare products. Product catalogs and order lists are provided for customers to place their orders, which can be received by telephone, fax or electronically via computer link. Internet ordering is also being used in parts of the business.
In its supermarket and retail operations, Bunzl operates three main programs: (i) direct-store-delivery, where deliveries are made to individual user locations, (ii) warehouse replenishment, where Bunzl restocks a customers warehouse on a planned basis, and (iii) cross-docking where orders are picked for individual stores of a customers supermarket chain, for example, and pallets are prepared, labeled by store and delivered to the customers warehouse. In cross-docking programs these products are not stored in the customers warehouse, they simply cross from the customers inward dock to the outward dock and are loaded onto the customers delivery truck with the grocery supplies for each store. Some cross-docking customers collect their products from Bunzls warehouse, as do some redistributors, which are smaller independent distributors that do not source the relevant products directly from manufacturers. In other parts of the business, deliveries are generally made directly to the customer.
13
Market characteristics
Customers are keen to reduce storage space taken up by a wide variety of products which are often bulky, low cost plastic and paper disposable products, so demand is strong for Bunzls outsourcing programs which deliver direct to their outlets on an as needed basis or via the cross-docking program described above.
Demand continues for ready to eat, reheat or cook at home meals, known as takeout food. These products are available in retail food courts, displayed as a range of ready to go starters, main courses and desserts which are often prepared on the premises. Customers can choose from set meals or à la carte from menu boards. Bunzl supplies an extensive range of specialized packaging and foodservice equipment for this purpose. With case-ready meats, produce, bakery and other food types gaining acceptance in the market, Bunzl is also obtaining an increasing share of business from food processors.
Many of Bunzls larger customers use Electronic Data Interchange, which involves utilizing linked computer systems, for placing orders and handling billing and account management information. This method of communication is quick and efficient both for customers and for Bunzl. Many smaller customers take advantage of Bunzls e-catalog for ordering.
In Europe, the role of larger distributors has been steadily increasing, replacing a distribution process characterized by regional, fragmented, typically family owned enterprises or manufacturers supplying customers direct. There is an increasing trend towards a full outsourcing service.
Products
Bunzl distributes thousands of items. Typically a branch might carry around 3,000 lines and have access to many more within the Group. Some examples of products are listed below by user type.
Grocery store supplies: meat trays, labels, plastic and paper bags, clear plastic containers, aluminum foil, merchandizing tags, platters, cake domes, plastic microwavable and oven proof takeout food packaging.
Hotel, restaurant and catering supplies: napkins, disposable table coverings, cutlery, cups, straws and stirrers, custom printed food boxes, pizza boxes, burger wraps, tumblers, paper plates, vending machine ingredients, catering equipment, custom printed soaps and shampoos.
Cleaning and hygiene supplies: paper towels, toilet tissue, liquid soap, disinfectant, cloths, floor polish, refuse sacks, mops, buckets and disposable gloves.
Personal protection equipment: protective workwear, high visibility workwear, protective headwear, footwear, gloves, respiratory protective equipment and hearing and eye protection.
Healthcare supplies: examination gloves, surgical masks, dressing pads and incontinence products.
Suppliers and customers
Bunzl purchases its supplies from a variety of manufacturers of plastic and paper packaging, plastic bags, clingfilm, aluminum foil, napkins, tissue, janitorial and other products ranging from large multinational organizations to smaller specialist manufacturers. Products are sourced both locally from domestic suppliers and imported from overseas. There has been supplier consolidation over recent years and suppliers are increasingly deciding to move away from direct sell of smaller shipments and instead utilize third parties like Bunzl for distribution of their products.
Customers range greatly in size. Larger customers include major national, and sometimes international, chains of supermarkets, fast food outlets, hotels, contract caterers, contract cleaning groups
14
and food processors. Smaller customers include local independent operators in these sectors as well as restaurants, cafes and sandwich shops and redistributors.
Raw materials
Many of the products the Group supplies have a significant plastic and/or paper content with plastic polymers predominating. As a consequence movements in natural gas, oil and pulp prices as well as other raw material prices may affect the cost of the products purchased by the Group.
Competition
The market is highly competitive in all sectors and geographic areas of operation. Competitors range from large distribution companies to small, local distributors in specific geographic areas. Many manufacturers also distribute their own products, selling directly to their larger customers, and many of the Groups customers also have distribution operations.
Bunzl has extensive distribution networks which can offer service to customers on both a local and national basis. It is a specialist in its field and is able to anticipate as well as meet customer needs and trends. Considerable investment in technology makes Bunzl a fast and efficient operator and management believes that this, combined with experienced and well organized teams of staff, ensures customers get the right product at the right price at the right time.
Organic growth
The business has grown organically by seeking to consistently develop long term relationships with customers and attract new ones. A particular growth area has been in expanding outsourcing services programs for customers which can be tailored to their precise needs. The programs can yield cost, space and working capital savings for these customers.
There has been supplier consolidation over recent years and suppliers are increasingly deciding to move away from direct sell of smaller shipments and instead utilize third parties like Bunzl for distribution of their products, thereby leading to further organic growth.
Another growth driver has been in identifying market trends and exploiting their potential, such as takeout food and food processors described above.
Business with supermarkets, non-food retailers, convenience stores, food processors, contract caterers and cleaners and the redistribution side of the business, where Bunzl supplies products to other small distributors, has seen growth over the years.
Acquisitions
The business in North America has been strengthened over the last five years. In June 2001 the acquisition of Godin in Quebec enabled Bunzl to serve national customers across Canada. In October 2001 the Groups geographic coverage of Canada was completed with the acquisition of Eastern Paper in the Maritimes. In October 2001 Bunzl also acquired Packers, a long established supplier to the US beef and pork processor industries based in Nebraska. In June 2002 Kenco, a redistribution business based in Seattle, Washington was acquired. In December 2002 the Group acquired Saxton, a redistribution business based in Phoenix with locations also in Kansas City and Denver, which has strengthened the Groups position both in cleaning and hygiene and the relevant regions. In February 2003 the Group purchased Enterprise, a distributor of plant supplies to food processors in Dallas, Texas; Greeley, Colorado; Atlanta, Georgia and St Joseph, Missouri. In December 2003 the Group purchased Prolix Packaging, a retail stores supply distributor based in Chicago, Illinois. In October 2004 the Group purchased TSN, a distributor of goods not for resale to the convenience store sector based in Denver, Colorado. In November 2004
15
Joseph Weil & Sons, a redistribution business based in Chicago, Illinois, was acquired. In December 2004 the Group acquired TEMO, a redistribution business based in Maspeth, New York City. Four acquisitions were completed in 2005. In September the acquisition of SOFCO, which is based in New York State and distributes disposable supplies to a number of sectors including grocery, foodservice and healthcare, was completed. At the end of September A W Mendenhall based in Chicago was acquired. Mendenhall serves the redistribution sector principally supplying foodservice, janitorial, industrial packaging and disposable products in the Midwest. In October the Groups position in the non-food retail sector was strengthened with the purchase of Retail Resources, a business based in New York providing distribution services to retail stores across the US including store supplies such as checkout and merchandise bags, jan/san items, labels, boxes and other paper products as well as specialized expense control systems. The grocery and food processor distribution business of Weiss Brothers, based in West Point, Pennsylvania, was also acquired in October. In January 2006 Bunzl acquired Master Craft, a US business servicing the redistribution and foodservice sectors.
A number of acquisitions have also helped develop the UK & Ireland business during the last five years. In February 2001 ICCS MacGregor, a distributor of supplies to hotels, nursing homes and contract cleaners in Scotland, was added to the Group. In July 2001 the Groups retail supply business was expanded by acquiring the UK carrier bag supply business from BPI thus building on the Groups international sourcing operations. In November 2001 Bunzl acquired W A Blyth, a distributor of personal protection equipment and cleaning and hygiene supplies in Wales and South West England. In May 2002 Lockhart, a distributor of catering equipment to the UK foodservice industry, was acquired. In November the Group agreed to purchase Darenas, a UK national distributor of cleaning and hygiene supplies, and completed shortly thereafter. In late December 2002 the Group purchased Thomas McLaughlin, a leading distributor of catering equipment in both Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. McLaughlin was a logical extension of the Groups existing business in Ireland and complemented the acquisition of Lockhart earlier in the year. In December 2003 the Group purchased OMahony Packaging, a distributor of supplies to retailers and food processors based in Cork, Ireland. In January 2006 Bunzl acquired Midshires, a business principally engaged in the operation and sale of vending machines and associated services throughout Central England.
The business in Continental Europe has grown significantly over the last five years through acquisitions. In October 2001 the Group acquired the DKI Group which supplies packaging consumables and equipment to the Danish supermarket and food processing industries, strengthening the Groups position in the Scandinavian market. In October 2003 Bunzl acquired MultiLine, a distributor of a wide range of consumables to the Danish hotel and catering industries. In May 2004 Bunzl acquired Groupe Pierre Le Goff, a national distributor of cleaning and safety products in France, which extended Bunzls business into France for the first time. In November 2004 the Group acquired Beltex, a distributor of cleaning and safety products in Hungary, Bunzls first acquisition in Eastern Europe. In January 2005, Bunzl completed the acquisition of Gelpa in the Netherlands, a distributor principally supplying the retail and food processor sectors with packaging and consumables. Bunzl continued its expansion into Central Europe with the acquisition of Tecep in July 2005. Tecep has operations in Hungary, Czech Republic, Slovakia, Romania and Poland, primarily serving the retail, foodservice, catering and food processor markets with packaging supplies and catering and food processing equipment. In April 2006 Bunzl announced the acquisition of Picardie Hygiene, a distributor of cleaning and hygiene products in Northeast France.
The business in Australasia has also been developed through recent acquisitions. In November 2002 the Group bought Lesnies, a distributor of supplies to food processors and retailers based in Sydney, Australia. In October 2004 the Group acquired the disposable consumables and packaging distribution business of Cospak, based in Newcastle, Australia. In July 2005 Bunzl purchased Sanicare, strengthening its position in the healthcare sector in Australia and New Zealand. Based in New South Wales, Sanicare
16
supplies disposable products principally into the healthcare sector. In April 2006 Bunzl acquired Allcare, a distributor of personal protection equipment and disposable products to food processors in Australia.
Effective information technology systems are critical to operations and process management and for financial and general management control across the Group. Substantial investment is continually made in computer systems throughout the operations to improve the Groups ability to service customers, enhance its market position, trade on the internet and contribute to productivity gains. Management considers that the quality of its systems is an important source of competitive advantage.
There is continuing use of Electronic Data Interchange for business transactions and communication between Bunzl and its suppliers as well as customers. Bunzl devotes substantial resources to this area. Internet ordering is also being used in parts of the business.
The industries in which the Group is active are not generally characterized by proprietary products and although the Groups companies hold certain trademarks and other intellectual property rights, the successful continuation of the Groups business is not dependent on such intellectual property rights and no one such intellectual property right is, by itself, material to the Groups business.
The Group is subject to a broad range of environmental laws and regulations in each of the jurisdictions in which it operates, including the US. These laws and regulations impose increasingly stringent environmental protection standards on the Group regarding, among other things, waste disposal practices and the remediation of environmental contamination. These standards expose the Group to the risk of substantial environmental costs and liabilities, including liabilities associated with divested assets and past activities.
The Group has an established environmental policy pursuant to which all its operating companies are committed to a program of continued improvement in environmental performance and committed to ensuring that each business area identifies and controls significant environmental risks associated with its activities, products and services. Bunzl is also committed to compliance with environmental legislation and regulations in the jurisdictions where Group companies operate. The Group periodically reviews its environmental practices in order to ensure that appropriate standards are being maintained. The Group regularly incurs expenditure in connection with environmental compliance requirements. The Group is involved in the remediation of certain of its properties. Management is not aware of any instances of non-compliance that would have a materially adverse effect on the Groups financial condition or results of operations.
The Group believes that the amounts that it has budgeted and reserved will enable it to satisfy its known and anticipated environmental obligations. However, environmental matters cannot be predicted with certainty and there can be no assurance that these amounts will be adequate. In addition, future developments, such as changes in law or environmental conditions, could result in increased environmental costs and liabilities that could have a material adverse effect on the Groups financial condition or results of operations.
17
Bunzl is a holding company conducting its operations through its subsidiary undertakings (some of which are themselves intermediate holding companies of other subsidiary undertakings). The following are the significant subsidiaries of the Company as of December 31, 2005. Each subsidiary listed is wholly owned by the Group.
Significant Subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
Country of Incorporation |
|
|
Bunzl American Holdings (No.1) Ltd |
|
England |
|||||
Bunzl Distribution USA, Inc |
|
US |
|||||
Bunzl Holdings France SAS |
|
France |
|||||
Bunzl Overseas Holdings Ltd |
|
England |
|||||
Bunzl Overseas Holdings (No.2) Ltd |
|
England |
|||||
Bunzl USA Holdings Corp |
|
US |
|||||
Bunzl USA Inc |
|
US |
|||||
Earthmedia Ltd |
|
England |
|||||
Selectuser Ltd |
|
England |
|||||
As of December 31, 2005 the Group operated its various businesses from a total of approximately 350 locations, the majority of which were in North America and Europe with the remainder located in Australasia. Most of these facilities were leased by the Group, with the balance owned by the Group. The Group believes that all such facilities are suitable and adequate for their use, and generally have sufficient capacity for existing needs and expected near term organic growth.
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS
The following discussion and analysis is based on the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements, which appear on pages F-1 to F-51 of this Annual Report. The Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as adopted by the EU, which differ in certain significant respects from US GAAP.
The Group has adopted IFRS from January 1, 2005 with a transition date of January 1, 2004. On transition, IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards was applied. This standard provided the Group with a number of optional exemptions from applying certain IFRS accounting policies retrospectively. Set out below is a description of the significant first time adoption optional choices made by the Group.
Business combinations, goodwill and intangibles
The Group has elected not to apply IFRS 3 Business Combinations retrospectively to business combinations prior to January 1, 2004. As a result, in the opening balance sheet as at January 1, 2004, goodwill arising from previous business combinations remains as stated under UK GAAP. If this exemption had not been taken the net book value of other intangible assets may have been greater, subject to separate identification of intangible assets, and the value of goodwill may have been lower, whilst the IFRS amortization charge would have been higher than currently reported as amortization would be charged on intangible assets arising on acquisitions prior to January 1, 2004.
18
Share based payments
Although no expense had been included in the UK GAAP consolidated profit and loss account for the year ended December 31, 2004, the Group had previously disclosed the fair value expense for equity instruments by way of a note to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2003. As such, the Group has not adopted the exemption to apply IFRS 2 Share Based Payments to awards made after November 7, 2002; instead a full retrospective approach has been followed on all awards granted from January 1, 1999 but not fully vested as at the date of transition.
Foreign currency translation reserve
The Group has elected to separately measure the foreign currency translation reserve from January 1, 2004 excluding translation differences arising before that date. IFRS requires amounts taken to reserves on the retranslation of foreign subsidiaries to be recorded in a separate foreign currency translation reserve and be included in the future calculation of profit or loss on sale or liquidation of the subsidiary. The profit or loss arising on any such future sale or liquidation may therefore be different than if the election had not been made. There was no impact on the IFRS profit for 2004 or 2005.
Financial instruments
On transition, the Group deferred the implementation of International Accounting Standard (IAS) 32 Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation and IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement to the year ending December 31, 2005. Consequently, financial instruments continued to be accounted for and presented in accordance with UK GAAP for the year ended December 31, 2004. With effect from January 1, 2005 the Group adopted IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. The effect of adopting IAS 39 at January 1, 2005 is presented as a movement in the Groups consolidated statement of recognized income and expense for 2005.
The Companys Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as adopted for use in the EU. IFRS as adopted by the EU differ in certain respects from IFRS as issued by the IASB. However, the Consolidated Financial Statements for the periods presented would be no different had the Company applied IFRS as issued by the IASB. References to IFRS herein should be construed as references to IFRS as adopted by the EU.
Under the IFRS transition provisions within the Form 20-F requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Group is permitted to provide two years of comparable financial information under IFRS and reconciliations to US GAAP for the periods presented.
For an explanation of the principal differences between IFRS and US GAAP affecting the Group, see Note 31 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements beginning on page F-45 of this Annual Report. This also includes a reconciliation of profit, a statement of comprehensive income, details of earnings per share, a reconciliation of equity shareholders funds and a consolidated cash flow statement.
Critical IFRS Accounting Policies
The results of the Groups operations and its financial condition are dependent upon the utilization of accounting methods, assumptions and estimates that are used as a basis for the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. The Consolidated Financial Statements of Bunzl are prepared in accordance with IFRS and the accounting policies employed are set out under the heading Accounting Policies on pages F-7 to F-13 of this Annual Report. The Company has identified the following critical accounting policies and related methods, assumptions and estimates which management believes are essential to understanding the underlying financial reporting risks and the impact that these accounting
19
methods, assumptions and estimates have on the Groups reported financial results. This information should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and this Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.
Pensions
The Group accounts for its defined benefit pension schemes in accordance with IAS 19 Employee Benefits. All principal defined benefit schemes are now closed to new entrants who are offered a defined contribution arrangement. The application of IAS 19 requires the exercise of judgement in relation to the assumptions used and for each assumption there is a range of possible outcomes. In consultation with the Groups actuaries management decides the point within those ranges that most appropriately reflects the Groups circumstances. Small changes to these assumptions can have a significant impact on valuations and the amounts reflected in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Assumptions vary for the different countries in which the Group operates and there is also an inter-dependency between some of the assumptions. Holding all other factors constant, an increase in the mortality assumption by one year would increase the pension liability by approximately £11 million. A reduction in the discount rate by 0.25% would increase the pension liability by approximately £14 million.
Intangible assets
IFRS 3 Business Combinations requires the identification of acquired intangible assets as part of a business combination. The methods used to value such intangible assets require the use of estimates. Future results are impacted by the amortization periods adopted and changes to the estimated useful lives would result in different effects on the income statement. It is estimated that a change of one year in the useful economic life of intangible amortization would have had an impact of approximately £1 million on annual operating profit.
Goodwill is not amortized but is tested annually for impairment. Tests for impairment are based on discounted cash flows and assumptions (including discount rates, timing and growth prospects) which are inherently subjective.
Revenue recognition
Revenue represents sales to third parties for goods sold and are valued at invoiced amount, excluding sales taxes, less estimated provisions for returns and volume and early settlement discounts where relevant. Returns provisions are based on experience over an appropriate period whereas volume and early settlement discounts are based on agreements with customers.
Acquisitions
Acquisitions are accounted for using the purchase method based upon the fair value of the consideration paid. Assets and liabilities acquired are measured at fair value and the purchase price is allocated to assets and liabilities based upon these fair values.
Determining the fair values of assets and liabilities acquired involves the use of significant estimates and assumptions (such as discount rates, asset lives and recoverability). Assets and liabilities are measured at fair value and freehold properties are typically determined by valuation on an open market existing use basis by qualified valuers.
Bunzl believes that estimates made in previous years have been accurate as any changes made in the 12 month period following acquisition to finalize provisional fair value adjustments made in the year of acquisition have not been material.
20
The following discussion and analysis of the Groups results of operations and the Groups medium term prospects should be considered in light of certain significant developments which have occurred in recent years in the Group.
Bunzl has followed a strategy of focusing its resources on areas where it has, or can develop, competitive advantage and which have sound organic growth potential. This has resulted in a major change in the Groups structure over the last ten years. Following the demerger of the Filtrona business on June 6, 2005, the Group comprises four geographical segments: North America, UK & Ireland, Continental Europe and Australasia. All segments continue to develop through a combination of organic growth and acquisitions.
Acquisitions
During 2005 the Group spent £124.4 million on acquisitions. The principal acquisitions made during the year were Gelpa, which the Group acquired in January, Tecep and Sanicare, acquired in July, SOFCO and A W Mendenhall, acquired in September, and Retail Resources and Weiss Brothers, acquired in October.
As explained in Risk Factors on pages 7 to 9 of this Annual Report the results of the Group are affected by the acquisitions it makes and the successful integration of the acquired companys operations in order to realize the anticipated benefits of the acquisition. Over the last two years the company has made a number of acquisitions.
The principal acquisitions were:
|
|
2004 |
|
Groupe Pierre Le Goff |
|
May |
|
Cospak |
|
October |
|
TSN |
|
October |
|
Beltex |
|
November |
|
Joseph Weil & Sons |
|
November |
|
TEMO |
|
December |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
Gelpa |
|
January |
|
Tecep |
|
July |
|
Sanicare |
|
July |
|
SOFCO |
|
September |
|
AW Mendenhall |
|
September |
|
Retail Resources |
|
October |
|
Weiss Brothers |
|
October |
|
These acquisitions contributed the following to Group results in the year of acquisition:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Revenue |
|
116.1 |
|
213.2 |
|
Operating profit |
|
2.5 |
|
10.4 |
|
The future results of the Group will be impacted by any decisions to make further acquisitions.
21
In January 2006 Bunzl purchased Master Craft Packaging, a company serving the redistribution and food service sectors in the US, and The Midshires Group, a business principally engaged in the operation and sale of vending machines and associated services throughout Central England. In April 2006 Bunzl announced the acquisitions of Allcare, a distributor of personal protection equipment and disposable products to food processors in Australia, and Picardie Hygiene, a distributor of cleaning and hygiene products in Northeast France.
The strategy and development of the Group is explained in more detail in History of the Group on pages 9 to 12 of this Annual Report.
Demerger of Filtrona
The pursuit of Bunzls strategy over recent years resulted in the Company having two business streams, Outsourcing Services and Filtrona, both of which had superior returns, good international competitive positions and potential to grow but which had little or no commercial overlap between them. Bunzl therefore decided to separate these two fundamentally different component parts by demerging Filtrona, its speciality plastic and fiber products business, from the Group in June 2005. This was achieved by paying existing shareholders of Bunzl a dividend in specie satisfied by the issuance of shares in Filtrona plc, a newly established independent public company. Effective as of the date of the demerger, Bunzl became a simpler organization concentrating on the Outsourcing Services business stream as a focused, international distribution and outsourcing Group.
The Group made no other divestments in 2005 or 2004.
Share buy back
In October 2004 Bunzl reinstated a share buy back program following the purchase and cancellation of 21.3 million shares in 2003. A total of 13.0 million shares were purchased into treasury in 2004 at a cost of £58.2 million (excluding expenses) and an average price of £4.48 per share. These purchases were consistent with the Boards continuing overall capital management strategy. This strategy seeks to maintain an appropriate balance sheet structure taking into account completed and prospective acquisitions and disposals. The treasury shares were subsequently cancelled in May 2005. No shares were purchased by the Company in 2005.
Share Consolidation
Following the approval of Bunzls shareholders at an Extraordinary General Meeting on June 2, 2005 and as part of the demerger of Filtrona, existing Bunzl ordinary shares of 25p each were consolidated on June 6, 2005 on a seven for nine basis into ordinary shares of 321/7p each.
Foreign currency exchange rate trends
As explained in Risk Factors on pages 7 to 9 of this Annual Report the results of Bunzl are impacted by the movements in the US dollar and other foreign currency exchange rates.
The US dollar average exchange rate trend over the past two years is shown below:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||
|
|
(dollars per |
|
||||||
Average rate |
|
|
1.81 |
|
|
|
1.82 |
|
|
In 2006 there have been no significant movements in the US dollar exchange rate compared with the end of 2005. The average rate for the period to March 31, 2006 was $1.75.
22
In 2005 the overall translation effect of currency movements increased continuing operations revenue by £22.9 million, or 0.8%, and continuing operations operating profit by £1.5 million, or 0.7%.
Bunzl operates on a worldwide basis. Accordingly the results of the Group will continue to be impacted by fluctuations in the US dollar, the euro and other foreign currency exchange rates.
Financial reporting standards and accounting policies
The following IFRS and International Financial Reporting Interpretations Committee (IFRIC) interpretations have been issued by the IASB and may affect future Annual Reports.
IFRS 7 Financial instruments: disclosures was issued in August 2005 and is required to be implemented by Bunzl from January 1, 2007. This new standard incorporates the disclosure requirements of IAS 32, which it supersedes, and adds further quantitative and qualitative disclosures in relation to financial instruments.
IFRIC 4 Determining whether an arrangement contains a lease was issued in December 2004 and has been implemented by Bunzl from January 1, 2006. The interpretation requires arrangements which may have the nature, but not the legal form, of a lease to be accounted for in accordance with IAS 17 Leases. This interpretation is not expected to have a material impact on the Group.
See pages F-50 and F-51 of this Annual Report for further discussion of certain recent pronouncements which may affect the Groups consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows reported under US GAAP.
Results
These are the Groups first full year results presented under IFRS. The income statement shows the results of the continuing operations of the Group. The discontinued operations are those of Filtrona, which was part of the Group until June 6, 2005, and its contribution to profit is included as a single line net of interest, tax and the costs of effecting the demerger.
Group performance
Revenue from continuing operations increased by 20% to £2,924.4 million with businesses acquired during the year contributing 5% of this increase.
Operating profit increased by 16%, or £26.4 million, from £161.1 million to £187.5 million. This reflected a good operating performance, underlying organic growth and the full year impact of acquisitions made in 2004.
Operating profit margin from continuing operations declined to 6.4% from 6.6% in 2004. This is after an intangible amortization charge of £15.9 million (2004: £7.8 million). Margin improvements in UK & Ireland and Continental Europe were more than offset by a decline in North America, caused by the effect of lower margin acquisitions, and a decline in Australasia.
Interest and tax
The net finance cost from continuing operations increased to £10.8 million from £2.9 million in 2004 as a result of higher interest rates and increased average borrowings due to acquisition spend more than offsetting strong operating cash flow. Interest cover was 17 times based on operating profit of £187.5 million and the net finance cost of £10.8 million.
23
The tax charge for continuing operations of £56.7 million represents an overall tax rate of 32.1% on the profit before income tax compared to 33.2% in 2004.
Foreign currency exchange rates
Currency translation had a marginally (less than 1%) favourable impact in the year primarily due to the strengthening of the US dollar, euro and Australian dollar against sterling. This translation effect is the major way that currency impacts the Group although there is also a small negative transaction effect on certain parts of the business. In 2005 the overall translation effect of currency movements increased continuing operations revenue by £22.9 million, or 0.8%, and continuing operations operating profit by £1.5 million, or 0.7%.
Earnings and dividends
Profit after tax from continuing operations increased 14% to £120.0 million. Discontinued operations, net of demerger costs of £17.3 million, contributed profit of £4.2 million.
Adjusting for the seven for nine share consolidation in June 2005, the weighted average number of shares in issue reduced to 338.8 million from 344.6 million in 2004 as a result of the full year effect of the share buyback in the last quarter of 2004 offset by shares issued on the exercise of share options by employees of the Group. Earnings per share from continuing operations increased by 15% to 35.4p.
An interim 2005 dividend of 4.9p per share and a final dividend of 10.8p per share will deliver an increase of 18% for the year. A final 2004 dividend of 9.15p per share and the interim 2005 dividend of 4.9p per share at a total cost of £55.8 million has been charged to shareholders equity in 2005.
Balance sheet
Shareholders equity has decreased by £24.5 million to £460.4 million principally due to a £117.6 million reduction as a consequence of the demerger and dividends of £55.8 million charged to equity, partly offset by retained earnings of £123.6 million. Net debt decreased by £49.7 million to £355.5 million due to £115.4 million of debt assumed by Filtrona and strong operating cash flow partly offset by acquisition spend of £124.4 million.
Commitments
Obligations under non-cancellable operating leases decreased from £154.3 million at December 31, 2004 to £144.4 million at December 31, 2005. 30% of these operating leases expire in more than five years, similar to 2004. At the year end the Group was committed to, but had not provided for, capital expenditure of £0.8 million (2004: £0.3 million).
Intangible assets
Intangible assets increased by £59.4 million to £695.5 million reflecting goodwill and other intangibles acquired in the year net of a £57.4 million reduction due to the demerger and an amortization charge of £16.3 million.
Capital expenditure
In 2005 Bunzl continued to invest in the capital base of the Group spending £11.4 million in relation to continuing operations. Warehouses have been expanded and upgraded during the year and new ones opened. Computer systems continue to be improved and installed into acquired facilities. These systems remain critical to the Groups ability to serve its customers in the most efficient and appropriate way.
24
Management believes that up to date assets are an important source of its competitive advantage and investing in them remains a priority.
Pensions
At December 31, 2005 the Groups IAS 19 Employee Benefits pension liabilities were £60.0 million, a £10.5 million decrease compared to 2004 due to a £32.4 million reduction arising from the demerger and an increase in the asset base being partly offset by increased liabilities due to a fall in bond yields and an increase in the longevity assumptions.
US Sarbanes-Oxley Act
As a foreign registrant with the SEC, the Company will be required to assess and report on the effectiveness of internal financial controls for the first time as at December 31, 2006. In order to achieve this the Company has established a steering committee and a detailed project plan which requires the Group to document and test internal financial controls and to adopt a recognized internal control framework. The project is proceeding satisfactorily towards completion.
North America
A combination of organic growth and acquisitions grew revenue by 18% to £1,665.2 million while operating profit rose by 9% to £113.6 million. The Group successfully integrated the acquisitions made during the fourth quarter of 2004 and announced four further acquisitions in 2005; SOFCO, A W Mendenhall, Retail Resources and Weiss Brothers. Though these new businesses came into the Group with on average lower margins, management have confidence in the integration and cost rationalization plans which are currently being executed. These additions reflect the strategy to reorientate the business mix towards the higher growth and higher potential sectors of redistribution, jan/san, food processor, non-food retail and convenience stores.
The grocery business, which is the largest of the customer categories, continued to perform well. Revenue, while ahead of 2004 both organically and through incremental acquisitions, decreased as a proportion of the total due principally to a strategy of concentrating growth and acquisition activities in the other sectors.
Rising fuel costs, increased regulation on drivers hours of work and greater traffic congestion has provided additional stimulus to the growth of the redistribution sector. The recent acquisitions, particularly A W Mendenhall in Chicago, have broadened the geographic coverage and improved the Companys ability to service customers in this sector. The Companys low cost and highly efficient operating platform offers an economic solution to both customers and suppliers. Bunzl believes that the potential in this sector will continue to grow as suppliers see the value of redistribution.
Although the processor business felt the effects of the various bans on US beef throughout the world, it had another year of sound growth in most categories. As Bunzl continues to demonstrate to customers the value in the one stop shop concept, it is able to increase the breadth of items it sells while helping them control their operating costs and working capital.
The successful integration of TSN, which was acquired in October 2004, provides the Company with opportunities to sell disposable packaging and jan/san products in addition to selected retail items into the growing convenience store sector. Bunzl believes this will grow in direct correlation with the expansion in size of the convenience stores as they begin to compete with grocery stores and fast food restaurants.
25
The acquisition of Retail Resources in October will allow the Company to grow faster in the non-food retail sector. Bunzls logistics platform can provide customers an opportunity to increase the number of packaging items without increasing their investment in inventory. Bunzl believes that the expense management system offered by Retail Resources is unique and provides customers with a management tool enabling them to manage and control their expenses in every store. Bunzls import program can also provide packaging solutions to these customers that will reduce operating expenses without a reduction in quality.
2005 provided plenty of operating challenges and one of those was the significant increase in fuel costs. As a result, management carried out a complete analysis of the transport operations to mitigate the cost impact. The Company re-examined routes, improved drivers education programs and implemented new vehicle tracking technology to monitor trucks en route. Furthermore the utilisation of enterprise systems and metrics helped customers and suppliers to clearly identify operating costs while increasing internal effectiveness.
On a more sombre note, it would be hard to overestimate the havoc wreaked by the hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma and the positive response by the Companys employees to these events. These hurricanes not only created operational challenges for Bunzl, its customers and suppliers, but also directly impacted the lives of many of its employees. Due to their determination, commitment and hard work the Company continued to service its customers and through teamwork, flexibility and a common IT platform all their needs were met, often by shifting the work among the branch network. These difficult times tested Bunzls operational capabilities but it believes that the performance has strengthened relationships with both customers and suppliers.
Bunzl continues to invest in technology and the new e-commerce supply chain initiative is increasing sales by providing added value to customers. Self-service features include internet based 24/7 access to electronic ordering with other features including inventory and pricing information, order and delivery status and customer history. Training and technical support from experienced personnel is also provided to customers.
In order to meet the demands of an evolving marketplace Bunzl implemented a new VIP (value, integrity and performance) sales training and development initiative. The program is customised to the Companys needs and enables the sales professionals to learn and apply state-of-the-art sales techniques and tools. The program content includes sales maximization, sales strategies, communicating effectively, successful sales calls, negotiation skills, responding to customers needs, understanding buyer motivations and handling queries. This comprehensive course will be attended by all sales personnel and a select group of other managers.
Bunzls private label program, Prime Source, continues to grow as the Company adds more items and offers customers a less costly alternative without sacrificing quality. This program has expanded significantly again in 2005 as Bunzl broadened the product offering and increased international sourcing. A Shanghai warehouse consolidates many of the Chinese sourced products and allows for efficient delivery even to the smaller warehouse locations.
Despite rising costs of both fuel and employee benefits, the Company believes that it has managed the cost platform effectively and is confident that the improvements to IT capabilities, facilities, logistics platform, supply chain and delivery routes will contribute to long term efficiency gains and lead to an even more competitive cost base in the future. Bunzl is also confident that, as it deepens the ties with both customers and suppliers, it will continue to provide a product and consolidation service offering that is of the highest level in the market.
26
UK & Ireland
Since the first acquisition in the UK in 1993, Bunzls UK & Ireland business has expanded to provide a wide range of consumables into a broad range of customer sectors. During 2005 the business continued to develop with revenue increasing by 4% to £664.2 million and operating profit by 9% to £55.8 million.
This increase has been predominantly organic with sales growth coming from new contract wins and range extensions, particularly from businesses adding products available from other Bunzl operations. In addition to revenue growth, profit has been enhanced through increased efficiencies from rationalization and improvement in operations which more than offset increases in fuel and raw material prices. The Horeca (hotel, restaurant and catering) markets remain challenging with ongoing consolidation and customers deferring non-essential spend. Sales growth was underpinned by the full year impact of significant contract wins in the hotel, restaurant and bar sectors in the second half of 2004. Bunzl also won and fulfilled contracts to supply light and heavy equipment for the fit out of two new sports stadiums in England and Wales. Operationally the Company introduced a standard IT system into the catering equipment business which now allows the increasing number of customers it serves with both disposables and equipment to receive consistent management information.
In a difficult high street environment, the Companys retail supplies business, which provides goods not for resale, grew through a combination of new contract wins, notably a three year contract with a leading high street retailer, and by adding new ranges to existing customers. Bunzls approach with new ranges and services is to prove the concept with one customer and then proceed to offer it to others. Within the healthcare market, increased imports and budgetary pressures within the National Health Service resulted in price deflation in examination gloves. Shermond maintained its sales momentum through sales of new products in other categories and gained operating efficiencies from the reorganization of the supply chain in 2004.
Overall sales were flat within the cleaning and safety business following rationalization of the cleaning and hygiene branch network. The subsequent reduction in operating costs more than offset the reduction in local sales around the closed branches and the Company still has a national network capable of servicing contracts anywhere in the UK. Greenham continued to develop business with local authorities and construction companies. Increased importing via the National Distribution Centre and sales of own label products offset pricing pressures, while operating costs and working capital remained tightly controlled.
Within Ireland the Company continues to develop. Bunzls largest area, the catering supplies business, benefited from new hotel construction activity driven by available capital allowances. The Company was also successful in winning new public sector accounts in the cleaning supplies business. Bunzl continues to grow the two smaller sectors, safety and retail, by leveraging resources in the UK, an approach that the new regional structure will facilitate.
Within the vending business, the market trend away from customers purchasing machines to having operating companies such as Bunzl charge for them as part of a fee, left overall revenue level with the previous year. However account wins in the hotel and retail sectors means a higher proportion of the sales is repeatable ongoing contracted business. This, together with good cost control, improved profitability.
Across the UK and Ireland the Company will maintain its segmental focus. The market oriented businesses will provide that focus while Bunzl will leverage the overall scale where appropriate to gain competitive advantage and increased efficiencies while sharing best practices.
Continental Europe
Bunzl successfully achieved substantial growth in both revenue and operating profit in 2005. Revenue increased 59% to £490.0 million and operating profit rose 95% to £25.3 million. This was driven by the impact of a full year of trading from Groupe Pierre Le Goff, acquired in May 2004, as well as from further
27
acquisitions in 2005 and some strong performances from the existing businesses. With increasing oil prices and higher costs of raw materials, all of the businesses have had to place a greater amount of effort into gross margin management and tight control of operating costs.
In a period of challenging economic conditions in France, the cleaning and hygiene business has delivered a robust performance whilst the personal protection equipment/safety products business has outperformed the market. Throughout the year Bunzl have reorganized the operational infrastructure of the businesses at Groupe Pierre Le Goff, with the merging of a number of the smaller operating units to create operating efficiencies and improve service. This reorganization programme will continue throughout 2006. An IT system implementation commenced at the end of 2005 in the cleaning and hygiene business and this will harness further synergies throughout the business.
In January 2005 the Company completed the acquisition of Gelpa in the Netherlands which has provided it with a route into the retail and food processor sectors. In difficult market conditions the business has integrated well with the existing operations. The two businesses have achieved synergies enabling them to exceed expectations in 2005.
In similarly difficult market conditions, the German business has developed its national accounts program as more customers realize the benefits which derive from the strong operating platform. This, combined with ongoing cost control, has been a key driver in delivering profitable organic growth.
Following its relocation to a purpose built warehouse in 2005, the business supplying retailers in Denmark has taken advantage of a stronger operating platform to offer an improved service to its customers. This has enabled the business to perform ahead of expectations and also sets a good base for further positive development in 2006. The operations at MultiLine, the business supplying Horeca customers in Denmark, continue to prosper, partly aided by a significant contract win in the second half of the year.
2005 was the first full year of Bunzls activities in Central Europe. The Beltex business, a distributor of cleaning and safety products, has taken advantage of growth in industrial activity in the region. With operations in Hungary and Romania the business has performed well ahead of expectations. Bunzls position in Central Europe was strengthened by the acquisition of Tecep in July. Tecep is a leading distributor of packaging supplies and catering and food processor equipment to the retail, foodservice, catering and food processor markets, largely in Hungary and the Czech Republic but also throughout Central Europe. The Company is gaining synergies in a number of areas and at the same time investing in the IT systems to create further operating efficiencies.
Bunzl continued to expand its geographic footprint in 2005 and remains optimistic about further expansion through acquisitions. Reorganizing Continental Europe into a separate business area will enable the Company to put the focus and resources behind the pursuit of these additional opportunities.
Australasia
The combination of acquisitions in late 2004 and mid 2005, as well as organic growth in the underlying business, contributed to an increase of 34% in revenue to £105.0 million and 24% in operating profit to £7.8 million.
The business strategy is for continued development of the consolidation platform, providing a greater offering to new and existing customers. This will gain momentum through the development of acquisition opportunities within the core markets.
In July Bunzl completed the acquisition of Sanicare which expands its position and product offering into the healthcare sector and complements its growing position within aged care in the region. In addition
28
the clinical expertise within this business creates opportunity to expand into other healthcare markets with a wider range of disposable consumables and leverage the Companys position in the UK healthcare sector.
Bunzls principal business completed the successful integration of acquisitions made in 2004 as well as winning new contracts within the targeted growth sectors, including healthcare, industrial, safety and catering. Lesnies continued to focus on developing core business within the food processor markets. During 2005 the Company introduced a range of specialized production consumables to complement its already strong position with specialist equipment into this sector. The business has added resource to drive growth within these markets and this will continue throughout 2006.
The Companys strong growth and leadership in the marketplace creates opportunities for purchasing synergies and the ability to leverage its global sourcing to improve its competitive position. Bunzl will continue to invest in its business through the establishment of new warehouses and the upgrading of existing facilities and further enhancement to IT systems. All of these many initiatives will enable the Company to continually improve its customer service offering which is the principal driver of the strong growth in this market.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Bunzl continues to be a highly cash generative business. The primary source of the Groups liquidity has been cash generated from operations. A portion of these funds have been used to fund acquisitions and share purchases, to pay interest, dividends and taxes, and to fund capital expenditure.
Of the net cash inflow from operating activities of £140.4 million, a £141.0 million inflow relates to continuing operations and a £0.6 million outflow relates to discontinued operations. The continuing operations cash flow is £35.4 million higher than 2004 due to an increase in profit and continued strong management of working capital.
Interest
The net interest paid increased to £8.4 million from £2.6 million in 2004 as a result of higher average borrowings and higher interest rates.
Dividends
In the year ended December 31, 2005, £57.8 million in ordinary dividends were paid, representing the interim dividend for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the final dividend for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Capital expenditure
Capital expenditure on continuing operations of £11.4 million was used to refurbish and expand facilities, upgrade and replace computer systems and enhance the quality and capacity of the asset base. Sales of fixed assets generated a cash inflow of £0.8 million.
Acquisitions
Spend on acquisitions totalled £124.4 million for 2005. This predominately related to the acquisitions of Gelpa, Tecep, Sanicare, SOFCO, A W Mendenhall, Retail Resources and Weiss Brothers.
29
Shareholders equity
Shareholders equity has decreased by £24.5 million to £460.4 million principally due to a £117.6 million reduction as a consequence of the demerger and dividends of £55.8 million charged to equity, partly offset by retained earnings of £123.6 million.
Net debt
Net debt decreased by £49.7 million to £355.5 million due to £115.4 million of debt assumed by Filtrona and strong operating cash flow partly offset by acquisition spend of £124.4 million.
Management believes that the Groups balance sheet remains strong and has adequate working capital for its current needs.
Management currently expects that future operating cash flow will be sufficient to fund its operating costs and costs of debt, to satisfy appropriate levels of capital expenditure and to meet tax and dividend commitments, subject to the Risk Factors discussed on pages 7 to 9 of this Annual Report.
At December 31, 2005, the Group had gross borrowings of £409.2 million, of which £136.0 million comprised a US dollar bond of $225 million. After deducting cash and deposits of £53.7 million, the Groups net debt at December 31, 2005 was £355.5 million, a decrease of £49.7 million from £405.2 million at the end of 2004.
The Group is currently funded by a mixture of one to five year multi-currency bilateral committed credit facilities and a syndicated facility totaling £687.2 million together with a US dollar bond totalling $225 million. The bank facilities mature between 2006 and 2010, and the loans under these facilities are drawn for various periods, at interest rates based on LIBOR. As at the end of 2005, sterling loans of £246.0 million were drawn under these facilities at average rates of approximately 4.9% and were repayable in early 2006. As these drawings were refinanced on maturity under the same facilities, dependent upon the term of the relevant facility under which they have been drawn, all £246.0 million of the loans were classified for accounting purposes as repayable after four years but within five years. No loans as of December 31, 2005 were secured by either fixed or floating charges on the Groups assets. In addition the Group maintains uncommitted and overdraft facilities to maintain short term flexibility.
The credit agreements under which the banks provide these facilities contain customary terms and conditions, including various financial and operating covenants (such as leverage and interest cover levels and customary negative pledge and reporting covenants). The US dollar bond also contains similar financial and operating covenants. Management believes that it is in compliance with all such covenants and that they do not presently impose undue restrictions on its activities.
At December 31, 2005 the Groups IAS 19 Employee Benefits pension liabilities were £60.0 million, a £10.5 million decrease compared to 2004 due to a £32.4 million reduction arising from the demerger and an increase in the asset base being partly offset by increased liabilities due to a fall in bond yields and an increase in the longevity assumptions.
Treasury policies and controls
Bunzl has a centralized treasury department to control external borrowings and manage exchange rate risk and interest rate risk. Treasury policies are approved by the Board and cover the nature of the exposure to be hedged, the types of financial instruments that may be employed and the criteria for
30
investing and borrowing cash. The Group uses derivatives only to manage its foreign currency and interest rate risks arising from underlying business activities. No transactions of a speculative nature are undertaken. The treasury department is subject to periodic independent reviews by the internal audit department. Underlying policy assumptions and activities are reviewed by the executive directors. Controls over exposure changes and transaction authenticity are in place and dealings are restricted to those banks with the relevant combination of geographic presence and suitable credit rating. The Group continually monitors the credit ratings of its counterparties and credit exposure to each counterparty.
The Groups objective is to maintain a balance between continuity of funding and flexibility. The Group is currently funded by a US dollar bond and multi-currency credit facilities from the Groups bankers. The US dollar bond, originally issued during 2001, is in three tranches, five years, seven years and 10 years with maturities between 2006 and 2011, for a total of $225 million at fixed rates of interest. The bank facilities have tenures ranging from six months to five years and mature between 2006 and 2010. At December 31, 2005, the available bank facilities totaled £687.2 million of which £246.0 million was drawn down. In addition the Group maintains overdraft and uncommitted facilities to provide short-term flexibility.
The majority of the Groups net assets are in currencies other than sterling. The Groups policy is to limit the translation exposure and resulting impact on shareholders equity by borrowing and/or using forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge the translation exposure in those currencies in which the Group has significant net assets. At December 31, 2005 there were no material currency exposures after accounting for the effect of the hedging transactions. Throughout the year, the Groups borrowings were primarily held in sterling and US dollars. The Group does not hedge the translation effect of exchange rate movements on the income statement.
The majority of the Groups transactions are carried out in the respective functional currency of each of the Groups operations and so transaction exposures are limited. However where they do occur the Groups policy is to hedge significant exposures as soon as they are committed using forward foreign exchange contracts.
The Groups strategy is to ensure with a reasonable amount of certainty that the overall Group interest charge is protected against material adverse movements in interest rates. The majority of the US dollar bond was swapped to floating rates during 2001. Interest rate caps are in place to reduce the Groups floating rate exposure to movements in LIBOR.
The Groups principal financial assets are cash and receivables which represent the Groups maximum exposure to credit risk in relation to financial assets.
The Groups credit risk is primarily attributable to its trade receivables. The amounts presented in the balance sheet are net of allowances for doubtful receivables, estimated by the Groups management based on prior experience and their assessment of the current economic environment.
The credit risk on cash and derivative financial instruments is limited because the Group restricts its dealings to counterparties with high credit ratings. The credit risk policy specifies the maximum permitted exposure to each counterparty.
31
At the balance sheet date there were no significant concentrations of credit risk.
Management believes that, as a more focused outsourcing Group that has recently been reorganized into four business areas, Bunzl will be able to advance both organically and through acquisitions and thereby grow the business successfully.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Group has provided bank, trade and other guarantees of £0.9 million to third parties as of December 31, 2005. For further information on guarantees see Note 20 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-31 of this Annual Report.
The Group uses financial instruments to mitigate its interest rate and foreign exchange risks. For further information on financial instruments see Note 14 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements on pages F-22 to F-26 of this Annual Report.
There are no other off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on the Groups financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditure or capital resources.
The following table summarizes Bunzls principal contractual obligations at December 31, 2005:
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Less than |
|
1-3 years |
|
3-5 years |
|
After |
|
||||||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||||||
Debtfloating rate |
|
378.8 |
|
|
40.0 |
|
|
|
61.4 |
|
|
|
246.0 |
|
|
|
31.4 |
|
|
Debtfixed rate |
|
29.1 |
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interestfloating rate |
|
77.3 |
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
32.0 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
Interestfixed rate |
|
0.9 |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance lease obligations |
|
1.3 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating leases |
|
144.4 |
|
|
27.4 |
|
|
|
43.9 |
|
|
|
29.3 |
|
|
|
43.8 |
|
|
Capital expenditure |
|
0.8 |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension contributions |
|
11.6 |
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
|
* |
|
|
* It is not possible to look beyond 2006 due to the variable nature of pension contributions.
Further information relating to the Groups long term debt is set out in Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsLiquidity and Capital ResourcesBorrowings on page 30 of this Annual Report. Operating leases principally relate to land and buildings. The Groups future operating cash flow is expected to be sufficient to meet these contractual obligations.
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
DIRECTORS AND SENIOR MANAGEMENT
Board changes since January 2005
As announced in February 2005, the demerger of Filtrona resulted in M. J. Harper and P. Heiden resigning from the Board on June 6, 2005 to take up the positions of Chief Executive and non-executive director of Filtrona plc respectively. Having originally agreed to do so, C. P. Sander decided for personal reasons not to assume the position of Chief Executive of Bunzl following the demerger of Filtrona and
32
resigned from the Board on July 13, 2005. Following a comprehensive search using an external search consultancy, M. J. Roney, who had been a non-executive director since June 2003, was appointed as Chief Executive on November 1, 2005. A. J. Habgood remains as Chairman. At the end of the year A. P. Dyer retired from the Board after having been Chairman from 1993 to 1996 and then Deputy Chairman until the demerger of Filtrona. On January 1, 2006 B. M. May, who had been Finance Director designate since June 2005, joined the Board as Finance Director. His previous role was as Finance Director of Bunzls European and Australasian business. Also on January 1, 2006 P. W. Johnson, Chairman of Inchcape plc, joined the Board as an independent non-executive director. Finally on January 31, 2006 D. M. Williams, Finance Director until the end of 2005, retired from the Board after reaching his normal retirement age and having served as a director for over 14 years.
The business of the Company is managed by the Board of directors, comprising executive and non-executive directors. The directors and executive officers of the Company as of April 11, 2006 are as follows:
Name |
|
|
|
Position |
|
Age |
|
Date of expiration of |
A.J. Habgood |
|
Chairman |
|
59 |
|
May 2006 |
||
M.J. Roney |
|
Chief Executive |
|
51 |
|
May 2007 |
||
J.F. Harris |
|
Senior Independent Non-executive Director |
|
58 |
|
May 2007 |
||
C.A. Banks |
|
Non-executive Director |
|
65 |
|
May 2006 |
||
U. Wolters |
|
Non-executive Director |
|
64 |
|
May 2008 |
||
P.L. Larmon |
|
President and Chief Executive Officer, North America |
|
53 |
|
May 2008 |
||
B.M. May |
|
Finance Director |
|
42 |
|
May 2006 |
||
P.W. Johnson |
|
Non-executive Director |
|
58 |
|
May 2006 |
A.J. Habgood was appointed as Chairman in 1996, having joined as Chief Executive in 1991. He is Chairman of the Nomination Committee. Formerly a director of The Boston Consulting Group from 1977 to 1986, he was then appointed a director of Tootal Group PLC subsequently becoming Chief Executive. He is Chairman of Whitbread PLC and the senior independent director of SVG Capital plc.
M.J. Roney was appointed Chief Executive in November 2005 having been a non-executive director since 2003. After holding a number of senior general management positions within Goodyear throughout Latin America and then Asia, he became President of Goodyears Eastern European, African and Middle Eastern businesses and subsequently Chief Executive Officer of Goodyear Dunlop Tires Europe BV, the joint venture between Goodyear and Sumitomo Rubber.
J.F. Harris was appointed a non-executive director in 2000 and is the senior independent director and Chairman of the Audit Committee. Appointed Finance Director of Unichem Plc in 1986 and Chief Executive in 1992, he became Chief Executive of the enlarged Alliance Unichem Plc in 1997 and served as Chairman from 2001 until 2005. He is Chairman of Filtrona plc and a non-executive director of Anzag AG and Associated British Foods plc.
C.A. Banks was appointed a non-executive director in 2002 and is Chairman of the Remuneration Committee. Previously Chief Executive of Ferguson Enterprises, the largest North American subsidiary of Wolseley plc, he joined the board of Wolseley in 1992 and was appointed Group Chief Executive in 2001.
U. Wolters has been a non-executive director since 2004. Formerly Managing Director of Aldi Süd in Germany, he built the business into one of the worlds leading retailers operating principally in Germany and Austria, the US, the UK and Australia. He is now Chairman of the Aldi Family Trust which holds the majority of the Aldi Süd shares.
33
P.L. Larmon is President and Chief Executive Officer of Bunzl North America. Having joined Bunzl in 1990 when Packaging Products Corporation, of which he was an owner, was acquired, he has held various senior management positions over 15 years. He became President in late 2003, Chief Executive Officer in 2004 and was appointed to the Board later that year.
B. M. May has been Finance Director since January 2006. A chartered accountant, he qualified with KPMG and joined Bunzl in 1993, initially as Internal Audit Manager, subsequently becoming Group Treasurer before taking up the role of Finance Director, Outsourcing Services Europe & Australasia in 1996 and Finance Director designate in June 2005.
P. W. Johnson was appointed a non-executive director in January 2006. Having spent most of his earlier career in the motor industry, he joined Inchcape plc in 1995 and became Chief Executive in 1999 and Chairman in 2006. He is a non-executive director of Wates Group Ltd.
Reference is made to pages A-1 to A-13 of this Annual Report, which contain Annex A thereto, the Directors Remuneration Report.
The Board has established the following committees:
Remuneration Committee
The membership of the Remuneration Committee comprises all of the non-executive directors. The Chairman of the Committee is C.A. Banks. The terms of reference of the Committee, as approved by the Board, embody the purpose of the Committee as ensuring that the Companys executive directors and senior executives are fairly rewarded for their individual contributions to the Groups overall performance having due regard to the interests of the shareholders and to the financial and commercial health of the Group. Members of the Committee do not have any personal financial interest (other than as shareholders) in matters decided by the Committee, nor do they have any potential conflict of interest arising from cross-directorships or day to day involvement in running the Groups business. The Committee meets at least three times a year and at other times as may be required. While neither the Chairman of the Company, A.J. Habgood, nor the Chief Executive, M.J. Roney, are members of the Committee, they normally attend meetings except when the Committee is considering matters concerning themselves. The primary purpose of the remuneration policy is to help ensure the recruitment, retention and motivation of the executive directors by providing fair reward for the responsibilities they undertake and the performance they achieve on behalf of shareholders. The Committee also oversees the administration of the Companys share incentive schemes for employees. The Board itself determines the remuneration of the non-executive directors. The terms of reference of the Committee are available on the Companys website.
Audit Committee
The membership of the Audit Committee comprises all of the non-executive directors and is chaired by J.F. Harris. The Committee considers reports from the Groups internal and external auditors. The reports from the internal audit function cover specific matters arising during the year in addition to matters which are the subject of regular review. The Committee also regularly reviews the resourcing of the internal audit function and its program of investigations. The Committee reviews the half year and annual financial statements before formal submission to the Board for approval. The Committee is also
34
responsible for reviewing the appointment of the external auditors and the broad scope of the annual audit. The Committee reviews and approves the level and type of non-audit work which the external auditors perform, including the fees paid for such work, thus ensuring that their objectivity and independence is not compromised. The Committee meets at least twice a year and at such other times as may be required. While the Finance Director, B.M. May, is not a member of the Committee, he normally attends meetings although the Committee has the authority to discuss matters with the external auditors without executive Board members present. The terms of reference of the Committee are available on the Companys website.
Nomination Committee
The Nomination Committee meets as and when required and recommends candidates for both executive and non-executive positions on the Board for the consideration of the Board as a whole. A.J. Habgood, J.F. Harris and C.A. Banks are members of the Committee which is chaired by A.J. Habgood. J.F. Harris chaired the Committee when considering the new Chief Executive appointment. The terms of reference of the Committee are available on the Companys website.
P.L. Larmon and B.M. May each have service contracts which provide for one years notice from the Company and six months notice from themselves. However on appointment, M. J. Roney, due to his relocation and move from his previous company after 24 years service, was provided with 24 months notice which during the first 12 months of employment reduces on a quarterly basis by one month for each quarter. During the period of months 13 to 24 of employment, the notice period continues to reduce quarterly but by two months each quarter so that after 24 months service the Company will provide M. J. Roney with 12 months notice. P.L. Larmons contract provides that on termination by the Company without cause he is entitled to receive payment of 12 months base salary plus health insurance coverage, reduced by any interim earnings. There are no provisions for predetermined compensation in excess of one years remuneration and benefits in kind. M. J. Roney, for the first three years of service in limited circumstances only, is also entitled to receive a repatriation payment to cover relocation and school fees that have been incurred. A. J. Habgoods service contract ended on December 31, 2005 and was replaced with a letter of appointment relating to his ongoing role as Chairman. The non-executive directors are paid an annual fee for their services. In addition, where relevant, they are paid a fee for chairing the Remuneration and Audit Committees. The non-executive directors do not have service contracts, are not eligible for pension scheme benefits and do not participate in any of the Groups bonus or share incentive plans. For details of directors compensation, see Annex A to this Annual Report, the Directors Remuneration Report, on pages A-1 to A-13 of this Annual Report.
New York Stock Exchange Corporate Governance
Under the NYSE rules, listed foreign private issuers, like Bunzl, must disclose any significant ways in which their corporate governance practices differ from those followed by US domestic companies under NYSE listing standards. There are no significant differences in the corporate governance practices followed by Bunzl as compared to those followed by US domestic companies under the NYSE listing standards, except that Bunzl follows the recommendations in the revised Combined Code issued by the Financial Reporting Council in July 2003 (Combined Code) with respect to membership of its Nomination Committee and the balance of independent directors on the Board.
35
The Combined Code permits membership of the Nomination Committee to be composed of a majority of independent non-executive directors. The NYSE listing standards require that the Nomination Committee be composed entirely of independent directors. The Combined Code recommends that at least half the board, excluding the Chairman, be independent whilst the NYSE listing standards requires a majority of independent directors.
As of December 31, 2005, the Groups continuing operations had 10,526 employees (2004: 9,455). An insignificant number of the Groups employees are represented by trade unions. The Group has not experienced any significant strikes or work stoppages in recent years and considers its employee relations to be good.
The employment policies of the Group have been developed to meet the needs of its different business areas and the locations in which they operate worldwide, embodying the principles of equal opportunity. The Group has standards of business conduct (including a code of ethics) with which it expects its employees to comply. Bunzl encourages involvement of employees in the performance of the business in which they are employed and aims to achieve a sense of shared commitment.
The following table sets forth, as of April 11, 2006, the total amount of ordinary shares owned by the current directors, and the percentage of the ordinary shares of the Company represented by such ordinary shares outstanding as of such date.
Title of Class |
|
|
|
Identity of person or group |
|
Amount owned |
|
Percentage of class |
|
||||
Ordinary Shares |
|
A.J. Habgood |
|
|
106,933 |
|
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
||
Ordinary Shares |
|
M.J. Roney |
|
|
13,888 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
||
Ordinary Shares |
|
J.F. Harris |
|
|
2,644 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
||
Ordinary Shares |
|
C.A. Banks |
|
|
3,888 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
||
Ordinary Shares |
|
U. Wolters |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
||
Ordinary Shares |
|
P.L. Larmon |
|
|
21,987 |
|
|
|
0.01 |
% |
|
||
Ordinary Shares |
|
B.M. May |
|
|
10,392 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
||
Ordinary Shares |
|
P.W. Johnson |
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
% |
|
Share Option Schemes and Plans
The Company operates the following share plans for the benefit of its employees relating to the acquisition of shares from the Company.
Sharesave Scheme (1991) (Sharesave Scheme)
The Sharesave Scheme, approved by shareholders at the 1991 Annual General Meeting, is approved by the UK Inland Revenue and was open to all UK employees, including the UK based executive directors, who had completed at least one year of continuous service. No further options have been granted under the Sharesave Scheme since it expired in May 2001. It was linked to a contract for monthly savings of up to £250 per month over a period of either three or five years. Under the Sharesave Scheme options were granted to participating employees at a discount of up to 20% to the market price prevailing on the day immediately preceding the date of invitation to apply for the option. Options were normally exercisable either three or five years after they have been granted.
As of April 11, 2006 under the Sharesave Scheme there were options outstanding to purchase 66,106 ordinary shares, at exercise prices ranging from 308 pence to 365 pence, exercisable until October 31, 2006.
36
Sharesave Scheme (2001) (2001 Sharesave Scheme)
The 2001 Sharesave Scheme was approved by shareholders at the 2001 Annual General Meeting and has replaced the Sharesave Scheme. The 2001 Sharesave Scheme is also approved by the UK Inland Revenue. It operates on a similar basis to the Sharesave Scheme as summarized above. As of April 11, 2006 under the 2001 Sharesave Scheme there were options outstanding to purchase 1,721,251 ordinary shares, at exercise prices ranging from 296 pence to 512 pence, exercisable at various dates until October 31, 2011.
International Sharesave Plan (International Sharesave Plan)
The International Sharesave Plan was introduced following the approval of the 2001 Sharesave Scheme by shareholders. It operates on a similar basis to the 2001 Sharesave Scheme save that it is linked to a contract for monthly savings of up to 400 per month (or equivalent in other currencies) over a period of three years and options are granted to participating employees at a discount of up to 20% to the market price prevailing five days before the date of invitation to apply for the option. As of April 11, 2006, under the International Sharesave Plan there were 143,703 options outstanding to employees in the Netherlands, Germany, Canada and Australia at exercise prices ranging from 296 pence to 512 pence, which are normally exercisable at various dates until October 31, 2009.
Irish Sharesave Scheme (Irish Sharesave Scheme)
The Irish Sharesave Scheme was introduced in March 2006 and operates on a similar basis to the International Sharesave Plan save that it is linked to a contract for monthly savings of up to 320 per month. It is approved by the Irish Revenue Commissioners. As of April 11, 2006 there were 32,828 options outstanding under the Irish Sharesave Scheme at an exercise price of 512 pence exercisable until October 31, 2009.
1994 Executive Share Option Scheme (1994 Scheme)
The 1994 Scheme was approved by shareholders at the 1994 Annual General Meeting. No further options have been granted under the 1994 Scheme since it expired in May 2004. A performance condition based on the Companys adjusted earnings per share growth relative to UK inflation over three years, has to be satisfied before options may normally be exercised.
On August 31, 1999 Bunzl filed a Registration Statement with the SEC on Form S-8 to register ordinary shares for issuance pursuant to the 1994 Scheme.
As of April 11, 2006 under the 1994 Scheme there were options outstanding to purchase 5,953,780 ordinary shares, including market purchased shares as well as new shares to be allotted, at exercise prices ranging from 229 pence to 482 pence, exercisable until March 2, 2014.
Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)
The LTIP was approved by shareholders at the 2004 Annual General Meeting and replaces the 1994 Scheme. The LTIP is divided into two parts.
Part A allows the Board to grant share options. In normal circumstances options granted are only exercisable if the relevant performance condition has been satisfied. Share options granted to date have a performance condition attached based on the Companys adjusted earnings per share growth relative to UK inflation over three years.
Part B of the LTIP allows the Board to award performance shares which is a conditional right to receive shares in the Company for no or nominal consideration. A performance share award will normally
37
vest (i.e. become exercisable) on the third anniversary of its grant to the extent that the applicable performance condition has been satisfied. The extent to which performance share awards vest will be subject to the Companys total shareholder return (TSR) performance over a three year period relative to the TSR performance of a specified peer group of companies. For further information on the current peer group see Annex A to this Annual Report, the Directors Remuneration Report, on page A-7.
On May 27, 2005 Bunzl filed a Registration Statement with the SEC on Form S-8 to register ordinary shares for issuance pursuant to the 2004 LTIP.
As of April 11, 2006 under the 2004 LTIP Part A there were options outstanding to purchase 5,406,903 ordinary shares, including market purchased shares as well as new shares to be allotted, at exercise prices ranging from 429 pence to 6821/2 pence, exercisable until April 3, 2016. Under the 2004 LTIP Part B there were 1,647,933 awards outstanding exercisable until April 3, 2012.
For details of options held by the executive directors of the Company, see Annex A to this Annual Report, the Directors Remuneration Report, on pages A-1 to A-13.
US Employee Stock Purchase Plan (2000) (US Stock Purchase Plan)
Effective January 1, 2000 the Company adopted the US Stock Purchase Plan for eligible employees of its US subsidiaries under which participating employees make contributions through payroll deductions to their respective employee option accounts (Option Accounts). At the end of every calendar month, a custodian appointed by the Remuneration Committee withdraws funds contributed to the participants Option Account to purchase ADRs in the open market on the participants behalf. Under the US Stock Purchase Plan, participants receive a 15% discount on the fair market value of the ADRs on the purchase date. The discount participants receive may be increased at the discretion of the Remuneration Committee, but in no event shall exceed the greater of 15% of the fair market value of the ADRs on the purchase date and 15% of the fair market value of the ADRs on the first business day of the relevant calendar month. Under the US Stock Purchase Plan, participants are limited to stock purchases which (taken together with all other stock options held by the participant under any other stock purchase plan of the Company) in the aggregate do not exceed $25,000 worth of ADRs for each calendar year. The US Stock Purchase Plan is intended to satisfy the requirements of Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. As of April 11, 2006, 194,156 ADRs had been purchased under the US Stock Purchase Plan.
On December 27, 1999 Bunzl plc filed a Registration Statement on Form S-8 to register ADRs in connection with the US Stock Purchase Plan and a non-qualified US stock purchase plan for eligible employees of Bunzl Northeast, L.P., which the Company adopted effective January 1, 2000 and ended effective December 31, 2001. Prior to its termination, 3,114 ADRs were purchased at a discount of 20% to fair market value on the applicable purchase dates under the non-qualified US stock purchase plan.
ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
As far as the Company is aware, it is neither directly or indirectly owned nor controlled by any corporation or by any foreign government.
The Company has been informed that as of December 31, 2005, FMR Corp and Fidelity International Ltd had a beneficial interest of 22,503,195 ordinary shares, representing 6.52% of the outstanding ordinary shares. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the SEC and includes voting or investment power with respect to the securities.
38
Under the Companies Act 1985, holders of voting securities of a listed UK company must notify the Company of the level of their holding whenever it reaches, exceeds or falls below specified thresholds. These thresholds are 3% (for material interests) and 10% (for non-material interests) and every one percent movement in the number of shares held which have voting rights. The following table sets forth, as of April 11, 2006, the number of ordinary shares held by holders of more than 3% and their percentage ownership which have been notified to the Company in accordance with the provisions noted above.
|
|
Amount owned |
|
% |
|
||
Lloyds TSB Group |
|
|
13,549,869 |
|
|
3.01 |
|
Legal & General Investment Management Ltd |
|
|
13,842,195 |
|
|
3.99 |
|
FMR Corp and Fidelity International Ltd |
|
|
20,367,716 |
|
|
5.88 |
|
None of the Companys major shareholders have different voting rights.
As of April 11, 2006 342,969 ordinary shares were held by 22 shareholders with registered addresses in the US. These figures do not include either the number of ordinary shares held by shareholders with registered addresses outside the US in which US residents have an interest or the number of any such US residents. As of the same date, 2,994,030 ordinary shares were being traded in the form of ADSs by 3 holders of record of ADSs.
The Company does not know of any arrangements which might result in a change of its control.
There are no material transactions between the Company and any related party. There are no loans outstanding from the Company to any related party.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS AND OTHER FINANCIAL INFORMATION
The Consolidated Financial Statements are set forth under Item 17. Financial Statements.
The Company and its subsidiaries are defendants in a number of legal proceedings incidental to their operations. While any litigation has an element of uncertainty, the Company does not expect that the outcome of such proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect upon the Groups financial condition or results of operations.
No significant changes have occurred since the date of the Consolidated Financial Statements included herein.
The Companys share capital consists of one class of ordinary shares. The trading market for the ordinary shares is the London Stock Exchange Limited (the London Stock Exchange) in London, England. The ADSs, each representing five ordinary shares of the Company, have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. (the NYSE) since October 29, 1998. The Bank of New York is the Companys depositary (the Depositary) issuing ADRs evidencing the ADSs.
39
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the highest and lowest middle market quotations for the ordinary shares, as derived from the Daily Official List of the London Stock Exchange, and high and low closing prices of the ADSs on the NYSE.
|
|
London Stock |
|
NYSE |
|
||||||||
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
||||
|
|
(pence per |
|
(US$ per ADR) |
|
||||||||
|
|
ordinary share) |
|
|
|
||||||||
Annual High and Low Market Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
35.35 |
|
29.90 |
|
2002 |
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
39.80 |
|
29.35 |
|
2003 |
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
40.70 |
|
28.98 |
|
2004 |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
44.99 |
|
37.96 |
|
2005 |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
55.00 |
|
42.06 |
|
Quarterly High and Low Market Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter |
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
44.99 |
|
37.96 |
|
Second quarter |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
44.14 |
|
41.25 |
|
Third quarter |
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
43.24 |
|
37.75 |
|
Fourth quarter |
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
44.37 |
|
38.45 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter |
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
52.43 |
|
42.06 |
|
Second quarter |
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
51.68 |
|
46.60 |
|
Third quarter |
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
514 |
|
|
55.00 |
|
45.31 |
|
Fourth quarter |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
55.00 |
|
48.00 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter |
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
61.71 |
|
52.63 |
|
Monthly High and Low Market Prices |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October |
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
51.78 |
|
48.00 |
|
November |
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
573 |
|
|
52.41 |
|
50.50 |
|
December |
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
593 |
|
|
55.00 |
|
52.33 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January |
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
596 |
|
|
56.50 |
|
52.63 |
|
February |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
601 |
|
|
56.99 |
|
53.72 |
|
March |
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
643 |
|
|
61.71 |
|
57.40 |
|
Fluctuations between the pound sterling and the US dollar will affect the dollar equivalent of the price of the ordinary shares on the London Stock Exchange and the price of the ADSs on the NYSE. On April 11, 2006 the Noon Buying Rate was $1.75 to £1.00.
ADRs evidencing ADSs are issuable by The Bank of New York, as depositary, pursuant to the Deposit Agreement dated as of October 29, 1998 among the Company, the Depositary and the registered holders and holders from time to time of the ADRs. The Deposit Agreement and the form of ADR are exhibits to this Annual Report, respectively, having been incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of the Companys Registration Statement on Form F-6 (File No. 333-9536) filed with the SEC on October 20, 1998 and filed herewith. Additional copies of the Deposit Agreement are available for inspection at the Corporate Trust Office of the Depositary currently located at 101 Barclay Street, New York, NY 10286, and the principal office in London of the agent of the Depositary at 1 Canada Square, London E14 5AL. The Depositarys principal executive office is located at One Wall Street, New York, NY 10286.
40
ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
MEMORANDUM AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
The Companys Memorandum and Articles of Association are incorporated by reference to Item 10 Additional InformationMemorandum of Articles of Association, as Exhibit 1.1 hereto.
Management does not believe the Company, or any member of the Group, has been a party to any material contract in the last two years, other than contracts entered into in the ordinary course of business and the agreement referred to below relating to the demerger of the Filtrona business (the Demerger Agreement).
The Demerger Agreement was entered into on May 16, 2005 between Bunzl and Filtrona plc to effect the demerger and govern the relationship between the Group and the Filtrona Group following the demerger.
Bunzl and Filtrona plc agreed pursuant to the Demerger Agreement that Bunzl would transfer the Filtrona business to Filtrona plc and that Filtrona plc would issue shares in Filtrona plc to the Bunzl shareholders as of June 6, 2005.
The Demerger Agreement contains mutual indemnities under which Filtrona plc indemnifies the Group against liabilities arising in respect of the Filtrona business and Bunzl indemnifies the Filtrona Group against liabilities arising in respect of the business carried on by the Group other than the Filtrona Group. These mutual indemnities are unlimited in terms of amount or duration and are customary for an agreement of this type.
The Demerger Agreement sets out how guarantees, indemnities or other assurances given by Group companies for the benefit of Filtrona Group companies (or vice versa) will be dealt with following the demerger. Where relevant the beneficiary of such a guarantee must try to obtain the guarantors release form the guarantors obligations thereunder and, pending release, indemnify the guarantor against all amounts paid by it under the guarantee and ensure that the guarantors exposure under the guarantee is not increased.
Both the Group and the Filtrona Group will be permitted access to each others records for a period of six years following the Demerger. Reasonable endeavours are to be used to ensure that contracts in the name of one group member whereby a member of the other group is deriving the benefit of that contract are novated to the relevant member of the other group, pending which the contracting party shall hold the benefit of that contract on trust for the relevant member of the other group. The parties have covenanted for a period of 12 months not to employ, solicit or entice away certain employees engaged in skilled or managerial worked employed by the other partys group. Both groups have agreed to keep certain information on the other group confidential, subject to certain exemptions (for instance if disclosure is required by law).
The Demerger Agreement contains detailed provisions relating to the discharge of indebtedness due from Filtrona Group companies to the Group, the establishment by Filtrona plc of its pension schemes and the transfer of assets to them and the allocation of tax liabilities.
The Demerger Agreement also contains indemnities relating to taxation. Subject to certain exceptions, Bunzl indemnifies the Filtrona Group against tax liabilities arising as a result of the demerger or certain pre-demerger reorganisation steps. Bunzl also indemnifies the Filtrona Group against certain tax liabilities which are properly liabilities of the Group being imposed on a member of the Filtrona Group and Filtrona plc indemnifies the Group against certain tax liabilities which are properly liabilities of the Filtrona Group being imposed on a member of the Group. All of these indemnities are unlimited in terms
41
of amount but do not cover liabilities which arise more than seven years after the demerger or which have not been notified by the indemnified party to the indemnifying party within seven years and 30 days after the demerger.
There are currently no UK foreign exchange control restrictions on remittances of dividends on the ordinary shares or the ADSs or on the conduct of the Groups operations. There are no limitations under English law or the Memorandum and Articles prohibiting persons who are neither residents nor nationals of the UK from freely holding, voting and transferring shares in the same manner as UK residents or nationals.
The following discussion is a summary of material UK tax and US federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs by a US Holder (as defined below). This summary is not a complete analysis or description of all the possible tax consequences of such purchase, ownership or disposal. It deals only with ordinary shares or ADSs held as capital assets by US Holders and does not address the tax consequences applicable to all categories of US Holders, some of which may be subject to special rules, such as:
· certain financial institutions;
· insurance companies;
· dealers or certain traders in securities or foreign currencies;
· US Holders holding ordinary shares or ADSs as part of a hedge, straddle, conversion or other integrated transaction;
· US Holders whose functional currency is not the US dollar;
· US Holders liable for the alternative minimum tax;
· US Holders who acquired ordinary shares or ADSs pursuant to the exercise of any employee stock option or otherwise as compensation;
· partnerships or other entities classified as partnerships for US federal income tax purposes;
· tax-exempt organizations; or
· US Holders that own or are deemed to own 10% or more of the Companys voting stock.
This summary is based in part on representations of the Depositary and assumes that each obligation in the Deposit Agreement, and any related document, will be performed in accordance with its terms. The US Treasury has expressed concern that parties to whom ADSs are pre-released may be taking actions that are inconsistent with the claiming of foreign tax credits by US Holders of ADSs. Such actions would also be inconsistent with the claiming of the reduced rate of tax applicable to dividends received by certain non-corporate US Holders. Accordingly, the analysis of the availability of the reduced tax rate for dividends received by certain non-corporate US Holders, described below, could be affected by actions that may be taken by parties to whom ADSs are pre-released.
This summary is intended as a general guide only and is based on UK legislation and HM Revenue and Customs practice, and laws and practices of the US currently in force (including the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended to the date hereof (the Code), judicial decisions and final, temporary and proposed Treasury Regulations), as well as the US-UK double taxation convention relating to income and gains which entered into force on March 31, 2003 (the Income Tax Convention) and the US-UK double
42
taxation convention relating to estate and gift taxes (the Estate and Gift Tax Convention), changes to any of which may affect the tax consequences described herein, possibly with retroactive effect. US Holders of ordinary shares or ADSs are advised to consult their own tax advisors with respect to the tax consequences of the purchase, ownership or disposal of their ordinary shares or ADSs, including specifically the consequences under US state and local tax laws and the tax laws of any non-US taxing jurisdiction.
As used herein, the term US Holder means a beneficial owner of ordinary shares or ADSs that is, for US federal income tax purposes:
· a citizen or resident of the US;
· a corporation, or other entity taxable as a corporation, created or organized in or under the laws of the US or of any political subdivision thereof; or
· an estate or trust the income of which is subject to US federal income taxation regardless of its source.
For US federal income tax purposes and for the purposes of the Income Tax Convention and the Estate and Gift Tax Convention, US Holders of ADSs will generally be treated as the owners of the underlying ordinary shares. Accordingly, no gain or loss will be recognized if a US Holder exchanges ADSs for the underlying ordinary shares represented by those ADSs.
UK Taxation of Distributions
Under current UK law dividends received by a US Holder from the Company will not be subject to UK withholding tax.
US Taxation of Distributions
For US federal income tax purposes, distributions paid with respect to ordinary shares or ADSs (other than certain pro rata distributions of ordinary shares or rights to subscribe for ordinary shares) will be treated as a foreign-source dividend to the extent paid out of the Companys current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under US federal income tax principles). Such dividends will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction generally allowed to corporate US Holders under the Code. The amount of the distribution will equal the US dollar value of the pounds sterling received, calculated by reference to the exchange rate in effect on the date such distribution is received (which for US Holders of ADSs will be the date such distribution is received by the Depositary), whether or not the Depositary or the US Holder in fact converts the pounds sterling received into US dollars on the date of receipt. Any gains or losses resulting from the conversion of pounds sterling into US dollars will be treated as US-source ordinary income or loss.
Subject to applicable limitations that vary depending upon a US Holders individual circumstances and the discussion above regarding concerns expressed by the US Treasury, dividends paid to certain non-corporate US Holders in taxable years beginning before January 1, 2009 will be taxable at a maximum tax rate of 15%. Non-corporate US Holders should consult their own tax advisors to determine whether they are subject to any special rules that limit their ability to be taxed at these favorable rates.
UK Taxation of Capital Gains
Holders of ADSs or ordinary shares who are US resident individuals or US corporations, and who are not resident or ordinarily resident in the UK for UK tax purposes, will not normally be subject to UK taxation on capital gains realized on the disposal of their ordinary shares or ADSs, unless the ordinary shares or ADSs are, or have been, used, held or acquired for the purposes of a trade, profession or
43
vocation carried on in the UK through a branch or agency or a UK permanent establishment, at the time of the disposal.
US Taxation of Capital Gains
For US federal income tax purposes, a US Holder will realize capital gain or loss on the sale or other disposition of ordinary shares or ADSs in an amount equal to the difference between the amount realized and the US Holders tax basis in such ordinary shares or ADSs. The gain or loss, if any, will generally be US-source and will be long term capital gain or loss if the ordinary shares or ADSs were held for more than one year. US Holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the US federal income tax treatment of capital gains, which may be taxed at lower rates than ordinary income for individuals, and capital losses, the deductibility of which is subject to limitations.
UK Inheritance Tax
Provided that any gift or estate tax due in the US is paid, the Estate and Gift Tax Convention generally relieves from UK inheritance tax (being a tax charge, broadly, on the value of an individuals estate at his/her death and upon certain transfers of value (e.g., gifts) made by an individual during his/her lifetime (generally within seven years of death)) the transfer of ordinary shares or of ADSs where the holder of the ordinary shares or ADSs making the transfer is domiciled, for the purposes of the Estate and Gift Tax Convention, in the US and is not a national of the UK, for the purposes of the Estate and Gift Tax Convention. This will not apply if the ordinary shares or ADSs are part of the business property of an individuals permanent establishment of an enterprise in the UK or pertain to the fixed base in the UK of a person providing independent personal services. In the unusual case where ordinary shares or ADSs are subject to both UK inheritance tax and US estate or gift tax, the Estate and Gift Tax Convention generally provides for tax paid in the UK to be credited against tax payable in the US or for tax paid in the US to be credited against tax payable in the UK based on priority rules set forth in the Estate and Gift Tax Convention.
UK Stamp Duty and Stamp Duty Reserve Tax (SDRT)
No stamp duty will be payable on an instrument transferring an ADS or on a written agreement to transfer an ADS, provided that the instrument or written agreement of transfer remains at all times outside the UK and that the instrument or written agreement of transfer is not executed in the UK. No SDRT will be payable in respect of an agreement to transfer an ADS (whether made in or outside the UK). Stamp duty or SDRT is, however, generally payable at the rate of 1.5% of the amount or value of the consideration or, in some circumstances, the market value of the ordinary shares, where ordinary shares are issued or transferred to a person whose business is or includes issuing depositary receipts, or to a nominee for such a person.
A transfer of, or an agreement to transfer, for value the underlying ordinary shares will generally be subject to either stamp duty or SDRT, normally at the rate of 0.5% of the amount or value of the consideration. A transfer of ordinary shares from a nominee to its beneficial owner (including the transfer of underlying ordinary shares from the Depositary or its nominee to an ADS holder) under which no beneficial interest passes is subject to stamp duty at the fixed rate of £5 per instrument of transfer.
US Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
Payments of dividends and sales proceeds may be subject to information reporting requirements of the Code. Under US federal income tax law, such dividends and sales proceeds may also be subject to backup withholding unless the US Holder is a corporation or comes within certain exempt categories and, when required, demonstrates this fact, or provides a correct taxpayer identification number and certifies
44
that no loss of exemption from backup withholding has occurred. Any amount withheld under these rules will be creditable against a US Holders US federal income tax liability and may entitle the US Holder to a refund, provided that the required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service. A US Holder who does not provide a correct taxpayer identification number may be subject to certain penalties.
The documents concerning Bunzl which are referred to herein may be inspected at the SEC. You may read and copy any document filed or furnished by Bunzl at the SECs public reference rooms in Washington D.C., New York and Chicago. Please call the SEC at +1-800-SEC-0330 (+1-800-732-0330) for further information on the reference rooms. Documents filed or furnished made by Bunzl via EDGAR are available at the SECs website, http://www.sec.gov.
ITEM 11. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Bunzl has a centralized treasury department to control external borrowings and manage the exchange rate risk and interest rate risk. Treasury policies are approved by the Board of Directors and cover the nature of the exposure to be hedged, the types of financial instruments that may be employed and the criteria for investing and borrowing cash. The Group uses derivatives only to manage its foreign currency and interest rate risks arising from underlying business activities. No transactions of a speculative nature are undertaken. The treasury department is subject to periodic reviews by the internal audit department. Underlying policy assumptions and activities are reviewed by the executive directors. Controls over exposure changes and transaction authenticity are in place and dealings are restricted to those banks with the relevant combination of geographic presence and suitable credit rating. The Group continually monitors the credit ratings of its counterparties and credit exposure to each counter party.
The Groups principal exposure to interest rate risk relates to changes in US dollar, euro and sterling interest rates. The Groups gross borrowings as at December 31, 2005 after taking into account the impact of foreign exchange swaps were denominated as follows:
|
|
Total |
|
Euro |
|
US Dollars |
|
Sterling |
|
Other |
|
||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||
Gross Borrowings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
409.2 |
|
286.9 |
|
|
280.4 |
|
|
|
(262.2 |
) |
|
104.1 |
|
2004 |
|
512.9 |
|
337.0 |
|
|
281.4 |
|
|
|
(195.4 |
) |
|
89.9 |
|
At December 31, 2005, after interest rate swaps, £29.1m of US dollar gross borrowings maturing within one year have a fixed interest rate of 6.4%. All other borrowings are at floating rates. The Group manages its interest rate risk by reference to its forecast net borrowings. A portfolio of interest rate caps fixing at three month intervals over a rolling 18 month period is used to reduce the impact of adverse movements. Financial liabilities with a notional principal of £211.1m were capped at December 31, 2005 (£178.2m at December 31, 2004).
45
The amount and nature of interest rate instruments utilized by the Group is determined by management upon an analysis of the composition of the Groups assets and liabilities and related interest rate characteristics, as well as prevailing market conditions and expectations.
The Group publishes its financial statements in sterling but conducts its business in many foreign currencies. The majority of Bunzls assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses are denominated in US dollars and other non-sterling currencies. As a result the Group is subject to foreign currency exchange rate risk due to exchange rate movements which will affect the translation of the Groups results and net assets. The Group continually assesses foreign currency risks and monitors the foreign exchange markets. The Groups policy is to limit the translation exposure and resulting impact on shareholders funds by borrowing in those currencies in which the Group has significant net assets and by using forward foreign exchange contracts. The Group does not hedge the translation effect on the income statement. The Groups operating profit is affected by the movement in sterling due to translation exposure. For example, the impact on the Groups operating profit of a 1% movement of sterling against the US dollar would be approximately £1 million.
The Group uses derivative financial instruments, such as forward foreign exchange contracts, to manage foreign currency risk arising from its underlying business activities. The majority of the Groups transactions are carried out in the functional currency of the Groups operations and so transaction exposures are of limited significance.
Credit risk arises from the possibility that counterparties to agreements entered into for financial instruments may default on their obligations. The amount of credit risk associated with derivatives is normally measured by the positive market value, or replacement cost, of any given instrument. Bunzl has no reason to expect non performance by any of the counterparties to its contracts involving financial instruments. Counterparties are approved internally at Bunzl according to certain criteria, including geographic presence and suitable credit rating.
Quantitative Disclosure of Market Risk
The analysis below summarizes the sensitivity of the fair value of the Groups financial instruments to selected changes in market rates and prices. Fair value represents the present value of future cash flows based on market rates and prices at the valuation date of December 31, 2005.
Foreign Currency Risk
The sensitivity analysis assumes an instantaneous 10% change in foreign currency exchange rates from those as at December 31, 2005 with all other variables held constant. The plus 10% case assumes a strengthening of sterling and the minus 10% case a weakening of sterling against all other currencies.
|
|
Fair value as at |
|
Fair value due to |
|
||||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Plus 10% |
|
Minus 10% |
|
||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||
Foreign exchange forward contracts |
|
(5.9 |
) |
(6.5 |
) |
|
58.1 |
|
|
|
(39.8 |
) |
|
Long term debtfixed rate |
|
(29.1 |
) |
(26.0 |
) |
|
(26.4 |
) |
|
|
(32.0 |
) |
|
Long term debtfloating rate |
|
(333.2 |
) |
(426.6 |
) |
|
(325.3 |
) |
|
|
(341.9 |
) |
|
Other financial net assets |
|
258.9 |
|
276.2 |
|
|
237.8 |
|
|
|
282.0 |
|
|
46
Interest Rate Risks
The Groups US dollar private placement issued in 2001 has three tranches of $75 million, $100 million and $50 million bearing interest rates of 6.4%, 6.7% and 7.1% and which will become due on July 2, 2006, July 2, 2008 and July 2, 2011, respectively. The seven and ten year tranches together with $25 million of the five year tranche were swapped to floating rates of interest based on the three month US LIBOR. The impact on the Groups profit before tax of an increase in interest rates of 1% would be an expense of approximately £4 million.
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
Not applicable.
47
ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
Not applicable.
ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Not applicable.
ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Chief Executive and the Finance Director, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)), have concluded that as of December 31, 2005, the Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective and designed to ensure that material information relating to the Company and its consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them by others within those entities to allow timely decisions of required disclosures.
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in the Companys internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Annual Report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
The Board of Directors has determined that J.F. Harris, who serves on Bunzls Audit Committee, is its Audit Committee financial expert.
Bunzl has adopted a code of ethics applicable to its Chairman, Chief Executive, Finance Director and Financial Controller and to all other Group employees. The text of this code is available on the Companys website, www.bunzl.com.
ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The following table summarizes the aggregate amounts paid to the Companys auditors for the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004.
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||
Audit fees |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
Audit related fees |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
Tax services |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
Audit fees include fees in respect of the Group. Audit related fees principally relate to the review of the listing particulars and circular to shareholders required for the demerger of Filtrona, fees in respect of the Interim Report and Form 20-F, accounting advice and due diligence and other duties carried out in relation to the acquisition of businesses. Tax services consist of tax compliance services and tax advice.
48
Audit Committee Pre-approval Policy
The Audit Committee has pre-approved assignments not exceeding £100,000 for pre-acquisition due diligence and for certain tax services. In the event any of these services is expected to exceed the specified limit, and for all other non-prohibited services regardless of the expected fee, the Chairman of the Audit Committee or, in his absence, another member of the Committee, must specifically authorise the appointment of Bunzls independent auditors to perform such services. Any such appointment must thereafter be ratified at the subsequent Audit Committee meeting. None of the services described above were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.
ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
Not applicable.
ITEM 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASES
At each of the 2005 and 2004 Annual General Meetings the directors were granted authority by the shareholders to purchase up to 10% of the Companys ordinary share capital in issue at that time. The 2005 authority was subsequently amended at the Companys Extraordinary General Meeting held on June 2, 2005.
At the Annual General Meeting held on May 19, 2004 authority was granted to purchase up to 44,850,000 shares. This authority expired at the conclusion of the Annual General Meeting held on May 18, 2005. The Board exercised part of this authority in relation to 13,035,000 shares during 2004.
At the Annual General Meeting held on May 18, 2005 the shareholders gave the directors a similar authority to purchase up to 46,595,000 shares and at the Extraordinary General Meeting held on June 2, 2005 this authority was replaced as a result of the share consolidation to give the directors authority to purchase up to 34,067,000 shares. This authority will expire on May 17, 2006. The Board has not exercised either of these authorities.
|
|
Total number of |
|
Average price |
|
Total number of |
|
Maximum number |
|
||||||||||
Month ended |
|
|
|
Number(1) |
|
Price(p) |
|
Number |
|
Number |
|
||||||||
January 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,815,000 |
|
|
||
February 29, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,815,000 |
|
|
||
March 31, 2005 |
|
|
689,700 |
(2) |
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,815,000 |
|
|
||
April 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,815,000 |
|
|
||
May 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,785,000 |
|
|
||
June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,067,000 |
|
|
||
July 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,067,000 |
|
|
||
August 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,067,000 |
|
|
||
September 30, 2005 |
|
|
1,521,401 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,067,000 |
|
|
||
October 31, 2005 |
|
|
119,816 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,067,000 |
|
|
||
November 30, 2005 |
|
|
332,662 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,067,000 |
|
|
||
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,067,000 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
2,663,579 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
(1) Open-market purchases of 2,663,579 shares were made in 2005 by Bunzl Employee Trustees Ltd, a subsidiary of the Company, in relation to employee compensation plans and were not purchased pursuant to the shareholder authorities referred to above.
49
(2) The purchase of 689,700 shares in March 2005 related to ordinary shares of 25p each. All of the other purchases made in 2005 related to ordinary shares of 321/7p each.
Reference is made to pages F-1 to F-51 of this Annual Report.
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements |
|
|
|
Page |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to the Shareholders and Board of Bunzl plc |
|
F-1 |
|
||
|
F-2 |
|
|||
|
F-3 |
|
|||
|
F-4 |
|
|||
|
F-5 |
|
|||
|
F-7 |
|
Not applicable.
1.1 |
|
Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company (filed herewith). |
2.1 |
|
Form of Deposit Agreement dated as of October 29, 1998 among the Company, The Bank of New York and the holders from time to time of the American Depositary Receipts issued thereunder. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of the Companys Registration Statement on Form F-6 (File No. 333-9536) filed on October 20, 1998.) |
2.2 |
|
Form of American Depositary Receipt attached as Exhibit A to the Form of Deposit Agreement (filed herewith). |
4.1. |
|
Service Agreement as of January 1, 2005 between Bunzl USA, Inc. and P.L. Larmon. (Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 20-F (File No. 001-14868) filed on May 27, 2005.) |
4.2 |
|
Service Agreement as of November 1, 2005 between the Company and M.J. Roney (filed herewith). |
4.3 |
|
Service Agreement as of January 1, 2006 between the Company and B.M. May (filed herewith). |
12.1 |
|
Certification of M.J. Roney filed pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act) Rule 13a-14(a). |
12.2 |
|
Certification of B.M. May filed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). |
13.1 |
|
Certification of M.J. Roney and B.M. May furnished pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b). |
14.1 |
|
Consent of KPMG Audit Plc to the incorporation by reference of their report dated February 27, 2006, except as to Note 31, which is as of April 28, 2006 under Item 3 of Part II of the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-93615) filed on December 27, 1999. |
50
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
BUNZL PLC |
|||
|
By: |
/s/ B.M. MAY |
|
|
|
Name: |
B.M. May |
|
|
Title: |
Finance Director |
London, England |
|
|
|
Dated: April 28, 2006 |
|
|
51
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to the Shareholders and Board of Bunzl plc
We have audited the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet of Bunzl plc and subsidiaries (the Group) as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the related Consolidated Income Statement, Consolidated Statement of Recognized Income and Expense and Consolidated Cash Flow Statement for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2005 (together the Consolidated Financial Statements). The Consolidated Financial Statements are the responsibility of the Companys management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these Consolidated Financial Statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the Consolidated Financial Statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Group as of December 31, 2005 and 2004 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two year period ended December 31, 2005 in conformity with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted by the European Union (EU).
As referred to in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, the Group has changed its method of accounting for certain financial instruments with effect from January 1, 2005, upon the adoption of International Accounting Standards 32 and 39.
IFRS as adopted by the EU vary in certain significant respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Information relating to the nature and effect of such differences is presented in Note 31 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
KPMG Audit Plc |
London, England |
February 27, 2006 |
Except as to Note 31, which is dated April 28, 2006 |
F-1
|
|
|
|
for the year ended |
|
||||
|
|
Notes |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Existing businesses |
|
|
|
|
|
2,808.3 |
|
2,438.5 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
116.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
2,924.4 |
|
2,438.5 |
|
Operating profit |
|
|
3 |
|
|
187.5 |
|
161.1 |
|
Finance income |
|
|
5 |
|
|
22.0 |
|
17.0 |
|
Finance cost |
|
|
5 |
|
|
(32.8 |
) |
(19.9 |
) |
Profit before income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
176.7 |
|
158.2 |
|
Income tax |
|
|
6 |
|
|
(56.7 |
) |
(52.5 |
) |
Profit for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
120.0 |
|
105.7 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year |
|
|
7 |
|
|
4.2 |
|
35.7 |
|
Total profit for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
124.2 |
|
141.4 |
|
Attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the Company |
|
|
|
|
|
123.6 |
|
140.2 |
|
Minority interests |
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
1.2 |
|
Total profit for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
124.2 |
|
141.4 |
|
Earnings per share of the total profit for the year attributable to the Companys equity holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
|
|
|
36.5 |
p |
40.7 |
p |
Diluted |
|
|
|
|
|
36.3 |
p |
40.5 |
p |
Earnings per share of the profit for the year from continuing operations attributable to the Companys equity holders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
8 |
|
|
35.4 |
p |
30.7 |
p |
Diluted |
|
|
8 |
|
|
35.2 |
p |
30.5 |
p |
The Accounting Policies and Notes on pages F-7 to F-51 form part of these
Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-2
Consolidated Statement of Recognized Income and Expense
|
|
|
|
for the year ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
Notes |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||||
Profit for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
124.2 |
|
|
|
141.4 |
|
|
Actuarial loss on pension schemes |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(27.3 |
) |
|
|
(13.3 |
) |
|
Deferred taxation on actuarial loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
Currency translation differences arising in year* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
Movement of cash flow hedging reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net expense recognized directly in equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.2 |
) |
|
|
(8.9 |
) |
|
Total recognized income for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
115.0 |
|
|
|
132.5 |
|
|
Adoption of IAS 32 and IAS 39 |
|
|
2c |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113.7 |
|
|
|
132.5 |
|
|
Attributable to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity holders of the Company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
114.1 |
|
|
|
131.6 |
|
|
Minority interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
Total recognized income for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
115.0 |
|
|
|
132.5 |
|
|
* Currency translation differences for 2005 of £8.1m are net of losses of £15.7m taken to equity as a result of designated effective net investment hedges.
IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation and IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement were adopted by the Group on January 1, 2005 resulting in a cash flow hedging reserve of £(1.3)m being recognized in the opening balance sheet. As at December 31, 2005 the amount recognized in equity was £0.3m and the movement in the year was £1.6m.
The Accounting Policies and Notes on pages F-7 to F-51 form part of these
Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-3
|
|
|
|
at December 31 |
|
||||
|
|
Notes |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
9 |
|
|
69.8 |
|
218.4 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
10 |
|
|
695.5 |
|
636.1 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets |
|
|
16 |
|
|
22.2 |
|
14.8 |
|
Total non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
792.3 |
|
869.3 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
11 |
|
|
272.3 |
|
275.2 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
3.1 |
|
Trade and other receivables |
|
|
12 |
|
|
470.7 |
|
465.4 |
|
Derivative assets |
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
53.7 |
|
107.7 |
|
Total current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
800.1 |
|
851.4 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
1,592.4 |
|
1,720.7 |
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share capital |
|
|
17 |
|
|
111.4 |
|
112.5 |
|
Share premium |
|
|
19 |
|
|
112.8 |
|
88.3 |
|
Merger reserve |
|
|
19 |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
Capital redemption reserve |
|
|
19 |
|
|
8.6 |
|
5.3 |
|
Cash flow hedging reserve |
|
|
19 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
Translation reserve |
|
|
19 |
|
|
8.5 |
|
0.7 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
19 |
|
|
216.3 |
|
278.1 |
|
Total equity attributable to the Companys equity holders |
|
|
|
|
|
460.4 |
|
484.9 |
|
Minority interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
Total equity |
|
|
|
|
|
460.4 |
|
488.8 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest bearing loans and borrowings |
|
|
26 |
|
|
339.7 |
|
290.2 |
|
Retirement benefit obligations |
|
|
22 |
|
|
60.0 |
|
70.5 |
|
Other payables |
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
7.6 |
|
Provisions |
|
|
15 |
|
|
38.3 |
|
30.3 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
16 |
|
|
79.3 |
|
79.8 |
|
Total non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
518.8 |
|
478.4 |
|
Bank overdrafts |
|
|
26 |
|
|
17.0 |
|
43.2 |
|
Interest bearing loans and borrowings |
|
|
26 |
|
|
52.5 |
|
179.5 |
|
Income tax payable |
|
|
|
|
|
40.8 |
|
54.4 |
|
Trade and other payables |
|
|
13 |
|
|
497.6 |
|
469.3 |
|
Provisions |
|
|
15 |
|
|
5.3 |
|
7.1 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
613.2 |
|
753.5 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
1,132.0 |
|
1,231.9 |
|
Total equity and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
1,592.4 |
|
1,720.7 |
|
The Accounting Policies and Notes on pages F-7 to F-51 form part of these
Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
Consolidated Cash Flow Statement
|
|
|
|
for the year ended |
|
||||
|
|
Notes |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||
Cash flow from operating activities of continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Profit before income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
176.7 |
|
158.2 |
|
Adjustments for non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
12.9 |
|
Intangible amortisation |
|
|
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
7.8 |
|
Share option charge |
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
2.8 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
(0.7 |
) |
Working capital movement |
|
|
|
|
|
(11.4 |
) |
(11.0 |
) |
Finance income |
|
|
|
|
|
(22.0 |
) |
(17.0 |
) |
Finance cost |
|
|
|
|
|
32.8 |
|
19.9 |
|
Special pension contribution |
|
|
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
Employee trust shares |
|
|
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
(9.8 |
) |
Other cash movements |
|
|
|
|
|
(6.4 |
) |
(7.2 |
) |
Cash inflow from operating activities of continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
197.7 |
|
155.9 |
|
Cash inflow from operating activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
7 |
|
|
2.2 |
|
64.1 |
|
Income tax paid of continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
(56.7 |
) |
(50.3 |
) |
Income tax paid of discontinued operations |
|
|
7 |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
(14.9 |
) |
Cash inflow from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
140.4 |
|
154.8 |
|
Investing activities of continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest received |
|
|
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
7.1 |
|
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
(11.4 |
) |
(11.4 |
) |
Sale of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
3.2 |
|
Purchase of businesses |
|
|
|
|
|
(124.4 |
) |
(234.2 |
) |
Disposal of businesses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
Demerger of business |
|
|
|
|
|
115.4 |
|
|
|
Other investment cash flows |
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
1.9 |
|
Cash outflow from investing activities of continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
(225.4 |
) |
Cash outflow from investing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
7 |
|
|
(12.3 |
) |
(56.0 |
) |
Cash outflow from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
(19.4 |
) |
(281.4 |
) |
Financing activities of continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
|
|
|
|
|
(20.2 |
) |
(9.7 |
) |
Dividends paid |
|
|
|
|
|
(57.8 |
) |
(54.4 |
) |
(Decrease)/increase in short term loans |
|
|
|
|
|
(102.2 |
) |
135.2 |
|
Increase in long term loans |
|
|
|
|
|
37.8 |
|
24.6 |
|
Decrease in finance leases |
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
(0.2 |
) |
Shares issued for cash |
|
|
|
|
|
26.6 |
|
4.9 |
|
Purchase of own shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58.6 |
) |
Cash (outflow)/inflow from financing activities of continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
(116.1 |
) |
41.8 |
|
Cash (outflow)/inflow from financing activities of discontinued operations |
|
|
7 |
|
|
(35.1 |
) |
11.9 |
|
Cash (outflow)/inflow from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
(151.2 |
) |
53.7 |
|
F-5
Consolidated Cash Flow Statement (continued)
|
|
|
|
for the year ended |
|
||||
|
|
Notes |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||
Exchange gain/(loss) on cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
(1.3 |
) |
Exchange gain on cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations |
|
|
7 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
0.4 |
|
Net exchange gain/(loss) on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
(0.9 |
) |
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
(27.8 |
) |
(73.8 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at start of year |
|
|
|
|
|
64.5 |
|
138.3 |
|
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
(79.3 |
) |
(Decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations |
|
|
7 |
|
|
(47.7 |
) |
5.5 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
|
26 |
|
|
36.7 |
|
64.5 |
|
The Accounting Policies and Notes on pages F-7 to F-51 form part of these
Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
The Group has adopted International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted for use in the EU in its consolidated financial statements for accounting periods from January 1, 2005. The consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005 have been prepared in accordance with all adopted IFRSs including the interpretations issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB). These are the Groups first consolidated financial statements under IFRS and IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards has been applied (see Note 29).
In preparing the financial statements the Group has decided to adopt early the amendment issued in December 2004 to International Accounting Standards (IAS) 19 Employee BenefitsActuarial Gains and Losses, Group Plans and Disclosure.
With effect from January 1, 2005 the Group adopted IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement. The effect of adopting IAS 39 as at January 1, 2005 is presented as a movement in the Groups consolidated statement of recognized income and expense for 2005.
The financial information for the year ended December 31, 2004 has been prepared on the same basis with the exception of IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation and IAS 39 which have been applied from January 1, 2005. The comparative figures for financial assets and liabilities are accounted for under UK GAAP.
In general, as a first time adopter of IFRS, the Group has applied the standards retrospectively. However there are a number of exceptions available under IFRS 1 and details of these are set out in Note 29.
IFRS as adopted by the EU differ in certain respects from IFRS as issued by the International Accounting Standard Board (IASB). However, the Consolidated Financial Statements for the periods presented would be no different had the Company applied IFRS as issued by the IASB. References to IFRS hereafter should be construed as references to IFRS as adopted by the EU.
Under the IFRS transition provisions within the SEC Form 20-F requirements, the group is permitted to provide two years of comparable financial information under IFRS and reconciliations to US GAAP for the periods presented.
a. Basis of consolidation
(i) Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries are entities controlled by the Group. Control exists when the Group has the power, directly or indirectly, to govern the financial and operating policies of an entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities. Subsidiaries are included in the financial statements from the date that control commences until the date that control ceases.
The purchase method of accounting is used to account for the acquisition of subsidiaries. The cost of the acquisition is measured as the fair value of the consideration plus costs directly attributable to the acquisition. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are measured initially at fair value at the acquisition date. The excess of the cost of the acquisition over the fair value of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded as goodwill.
F-7
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
2. Accounting policies (Continued)
a. Basis of consolidation (Continued)
(ii) Transactions eliminated on consolidation
Intragroup balances and any unrealized gains and losses or income and expense arising from intragroup transactions are eliminated in preparing the consolidated financial statements.
b. Foreign currency
(i) Foreign currency transactions
Transactions in foreign currencies are recorded at the rate of exchange at the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies at the balance sheet date are translated at the exchange rate prevailing at that date. Foreign exchange differences arising on translation are recognized in the income statement.
(ii) Financial statements of foreign operations
Assets and liabilities of foreign operations, including goodwill, intangibles and fair value adjustments arising on consolidation, are translated at the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Income and expenses of foreign operations are translated at average exchange rates. Exchange differences arising on retranslation are recognized in the translation reserve.
(iii) Net investment in foreign operations
Exchange differences arising from the translation at the net investment in foreign operations and related hedges are taken to the translation reserve and released to the income statement on disposal. In respect of all foreign operations, differences that have arisen since January 1, 2004, the date of transition to IFRS, are presented as a separate component of equity.
c. Financial instruments
The financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 have been prepared using the accounting policies previously applied for financial instruments under UK GAAP as the Group has adopted the IFRS 1 exemption not to apply IAS 32 and IAS 39 to the comparative period. Under UK GAAP forward foreign exchange contracts hedging transaction exposures were revalued at year end exchange rates with net unrealised gains and losses being deferred to match the maturity of the underlying exposure. The accounting policies described below for financial instruments are applicable from January 1, 2005. The effect of adopting these standards was to recognize a net derivative liability of £1.3m in the opening balance sheet.
Under IAS 39, financial instruments are initially measured at fair value with subsequent measurement depending upon the classification of the instrument. Financial assets classified as available for sale and financial assets or liabilities classified as at fair value through profit or loss (including derivatives) are held at fair value. Other financial assets and liabilities are held at amortized cost, unless they are in a fair value hedging relationship. Derivative financial instruments are used to hedge exposures to foreign exchange and interest rate risks.
F-8
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
2. Accounting policies (Continued)
c. Financial instruments (Continued)
(i) Fair value hedge
Where a derivative financial instrument is designated as a hedge of variability in fair value of a recognized asset or liability, all changes in the fair value of the derivative are recognized immediately in the income statement. The carrying value of the hedged item is adjusted by the change in fair value that is attributable to the risk being hedged.
(ii) Cash flow hedge
Where derivatives that are designated and qualify as a hedge are used to hedge forecast transactions, any effective portion of the change in fair value is recognized in equity. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion is recognized immediately in the income statement. Amounts accumulated in equity are recycled to the income statement in the period when the hedged item will affect profit.
(iii) Hedge of net investment in foreign operations
Gains or losses on instruments used to hedge net investment in foreign operations that are effective hedges are recognized in equity. Ineffective hedges or portions thereof are recognized in the income statement.
d. Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment losses. The revalued amounts of previously revalued properties were treated as deemed cost upon transition to IFRS.
e. Depreciation
Depreciation is normally provided on a straight line basis to write off cost over the estimated remaining useful lives. This is at the following annual rates applied to cost or deemed cost less estimated residual value:
Buildings |
|
2% or life of lease if shorter |
Plant and machinery |
|
1020% |
Fixtures, fittings and equipment |
|
1033% |
Freehold land |
|
Not depreciated |
The assets residual values, useful lives and depreciation methods are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at each balance sheet date.
f. Intangible assets
(i) Goodwill
Acquisitions are accounted for using the purchase method. As permitted by IFRS 1 the Group has chosen to apply IFRS 3 Business Combinations from January 1, 2004 and has elected not to restate previous business combinations. For acquisitions that have occurred on or after January 1, 2004, goodwill
F-9
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
2. Accounting policies (Continued)
f. Intangible assets (Continued)
represents the difference between the fair value of consideration given and the fair value of net identifiable assets. For acquisitions made before January 1, 2004, goodwill is included on the basis of deemed cost, which represents the amount previously recorded under UK GAAP. Goodwill is stated at cost less any impairment losses. Goodwill is allocated to cash generating units and is not amortized but tested annually for impairment. Negative goodwill arising on acquisition is recognized in the income statement.
(ii) Other intangible assets
Intangible assets acquired in a business combination are recognized on acquisition and recorded at fair value. To date these have principally been related to customer lists and relationships. Amortization is charged to the income statement on a straight line basis over the estimated useful economic lives (15 to 18 years). Other intangible assets are stated at cost less accumulated amortization and any impairment losses.
g. Leases
Operating lease rentals and any incentives receivable are recognized in the income statement on a straight line basis over the term of the relevant lease. Leases in which the Group assumes substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the leased assets are classified as finance leases. Where land and buildings are held under finance leases the accounting treatment of the land is considered separately from that of the buildings.
h. Impairment
The carrying amounts of the Groups long term assets, other than inventory and deferred tax assets, are reviewed at each balance sheet date to determine if there is any indication of impairment. If any such indication exists, the assets recoverable amount is estimated. Impairment losses are recognized when the carrying amount of an asset or its cash generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount, with impairment losses being recognized in the income statement. For goodwill the recoverable amount is estimated at each balance sheet date. The recoverable amount is the greater of net selling price and value in use. In assessing value in use estimated future cash flows are discounted to present value using a pre-tax discount rate which reflects the current market assessment of the time value of money and the risks specific to the asset.
i. Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost (on a first in, first out basis) and net realisable value.
j. Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances and fixed term investments with maturities of three months or less from the date of acquisition. In preparing the consolidated cash flow statement, cash and cash equivalents also comprise bank overdrafts.
k. Trade and other receivables
Trade and other receivables are stated at cost less any impairment losses.
l. Trade and other payables
Trade and other payables are stated at cost.
F-10
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
2. Accounting policies (Continued)
m. Income tax
Income tax in the income statement comprises current and deferred tax. Income tax is recognized in the income statement except when it relates to items reflected in equity when it is recognized in equity.
Current tax reflects tax payable on taxable income for the year using rates enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date and any adjustments in respect of prior years.
Deferred tax is provided using the balance sheet liability method providing for certain temporary differences arising between tax bases and carrying amounts in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets are recognized to the extent that it is probable that future taxable profit will be available against which any asset can be utilised. Deferred tax assets are reduced to the extent that it is no longer probable that the related tax benefit will be realised.
n. Revenue
Revenue from the sale of goods is recognized in the income statement when significant risks and rewards of ownership have been transferred to the buyer. Revenue is not recognized if there is significant uncertainty regarding recovery of the consideration due, nor is it recognized if there is significant uncertainty concerning the return of goods.
o. Employee benefits
(i) Defined contribution plans
Obligations for contributions to defined contribution pension schemes are charged as an expense to the income statement as incurred.
(ii) Defined benefit plans
IAS 19 has been applied to the Groups defined benefit schemes. Accordingly all actuarial gains and losses at January 1, 2004, the date of transition to IFRS, were recognized. Actuarial gains and losses arising on or after January 1, 2004 are recognized in full in the consolidated statement of recognized income and expense.
Pension liabilities are recognized in the consolidated balance sheet and represent the difference between the market value of scheme assets and the present value of scheme liabilities. Scheme liabilities are determined on an actuarial basis using the projected unit method and discounted using a rate of AA rated bonds that have a similar maturity to the scheme liabilities.
Current service cost, past service cost and gains and losses on any settlement and curtailments are charged to the income statement. The expected increase in the present value of scheme liabilities arising during the year is included within finance cost and the expected return generated during the year on scheme assets is included within finance income.
p. Share based payments
The Group operates equity settled, share based compensation plans. The total expected expense based on the fair value at grant date of options and other share based incentives is calculated using a valuation model at the date of grant and spread over the expected vesting period. The corresponding credit entry is taken to equity. Details of these plans are outlined in the Directors Remuneration Report on pages A-1 to A-13.
F-11
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
2. Accounting policies (Continued)
q. Provisions
Provisions are recognized in the balance sheet when the Group has a present legal or constructive obligation as a result of a past event and where it is probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to settle the obligation. If the effect is material, provisions are determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the liability.
A provision for onerous contracts is recognized when the expected benefits to be derived by the Group from a contract are lower than the unavoidable costs of meeting its obligation under the contract.
r. Net debt
Net debt is defined as cash and cash equivalents, net of interest bearing loans and borrowings.
s. Discontinued operations
Discontinued operations represent a component of the Group that has either been disposed of or is classified as held for sale in accordance with IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations. The profit or loss after tax of the discontinued component is disclosed as a single line on the income statement. The cash flows of the discontinued component are also disclosed as a single line in each of the categories in the cash flow statement.
The following provides information on those policies that management considers critical because of the level of judgement and estimation involved which often involve assumptions regarding future events which can vary from what is anticipated. The directors believe that the financial statements reflect appropriate judgements and estimations and provide a true and fair view of the Groups performance and financial position.
a. Pensions
The Group accounts for its defined benefit pension schemes in accordance with IAS 19 Employee Benefits. The application of IAS 19 requires the exercise of judgement in relation to the assumptions used (see Note 22) and for each assumption there is a range of possible outcomes. In consultation with the Groups actuaries management decides the point within those ranges that most appropriately reflects the Groups circumstances. Small changes to these assumptions can have a significant impact on valuations.
b. Intangible assets
IFRS 3 requires the identification of acquired intangible assets as part of a business combination. The methods used to value such intangible assets require the use of estimates. Future results are impacted by the amortization periods adopted and changes to the estimated useful lives would result in different effects on the income statement.
Goodwill is not amortized but is tested annually for impairment. Tests for impairment are based on discounted cash flows and assumptions (including discount rates, timing and growth prospects) which are inherently subjective.
F-12
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
2. Accounting policies (Continued)
c. Revenue recognition
Revenue represents sales to third parties for goods sold and are valued at invoiced amount, excluding sales taxes, less estimated provisions for returns and volume and early settlement discounts where relevant. Returns provisions are based on experience over an appropriate period whereas volume and early settlement discounts are based on agreements with customers.
d. Acquisitions
Acquisitions are accounted for using the purchase method based upon the fair value of the consideration paid. Assets and liabilities are measured at fair value and the purchase price is allocated to assets and liabilities based upon these fair values.
Determining the fair values of assets and liabilities acquired involved the use of significant estimates and assumptions (such as discount rates, asset lives and recoverability). Assets and liabilities are measured at fair value and freehold properties are typically determined by valuation on an open market existing use basis by qualified valuers.
Management believes that estimates made in previous years have been accurate as any change made in the 12 month period following acquisition to finalize provisional fair value adjustments made in the year of acquisition have not been material.
F-13
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
3. Segment analysis
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
North America |
|
UK & Ireland |
|
Continental |
|
Australasia |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
||||||||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||||||||
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
1,665.2 |
|
|
|
664.2 |
|
|
|
490.0 |
|
|
|
105.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,924.4 |
|
Operating profit/(loss) |
|
|
113.6 |
|
|
|
55.8 |
|
|
|
25.3 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
187.5 |
|
Finance income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22.0 |
|
Finance cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(32.8 |
) |
Profit before income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176.7 |
|
Income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56.7 |
) |
Profit for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120.0 |
|
Capital expenditure |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
11.4 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
13.6 |
|
Assets |
|
|
375.3 |
|
|
|
214.3 |
|
|
|
182.9 |
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
818.8 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
191.2 |
|
|
|
143.0 |
|
|
|
131.6 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
515.5 |
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004 |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
North America |
|
UK & Ireland |
|
Continental |
|
Australasia |
|
Corporate |
|
Total |
|
||||||||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||||||||
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
1,412.9 |
|
|
|
638.9 |
|
|
|
308.3 |
|
|
|
78.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,438.5 |
|
Operating profit/(loss) |
|
|
104.7 |
|
|
|
51.0 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
(13.9 |
) |
|
161.1 |
|
Finance income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
Finance cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19.9 |
) |
Profit before income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158.2 |
|
Income tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(52.5 |
) |
Profit for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
105.7 |
|
Capital expenditure |
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
12.9 |
|
Assets |
|
|
272.0 |
|
|
|
214.8 |
|
|
|
162.4 |
|
|
|
26.7 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
684.7 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
141.6 |
|
|
|
129.7 |
|
|
|
108.9 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
411.0 |
|
The directors consider the secondary segment as defined in IAS 14 Segment Reporting to relate to the Groups continuing operations. Accordingly the total amounts shown above relate to this reportable segment.
The revenue presented above relates to external customers having eliminated intra segment sales (which are immaterial).
F-14
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
4. Analysis of operating income and expenses
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Changes in inventories of finished goods and work-in-progress |
|
(103.6 |
) |
(53.9 |
) |
Purchase of goods |
|
2,296.9 |
|
1,880.3 |
|
Employee costs (see Note 23) |
|
296.9 |
|
250.8 |
|
Depreciation and other amounts written off property, plant and equipment and intangible fixed assets |
|
29.5 |
|
20.7 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
217.2 |
|
179.5 |
|
Net operating expenses |
|
2,736.9 |
|
2,277.4 |
|
Hire of plant and machineryrentals payable under operating leases |
|
15.2 |
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||
Remuneration of the Groups principal auditors for statutory reporting |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||||||||||||||
|
|
UK |
|
Overseas |
|
Total |
|
UK |
|
Overseas |
|
Total |
|
||||||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||||||
Analysis of non-audit fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audit services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory audit related |
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
Further assurance services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advice on accounting matters |
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
Due diligence |
|
0.3 |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
Tax services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advisory |
|
0.1 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
Compliance |
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
Services related to demerger |
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
Statutory audit related services include the work on the Form 20-F US filing and the Interim Report of the Group. The fees for further assurance services principally related to due diligence and other duties carried out in respect of the acquisition of businesses. The Group believes that, given their detailed knowledge of the Groups operations, its structure and accounting policies and the importance of carrying out detailed due diligence as part of the acquisition process, it is appropriate for this additional work to be carried out by the Groups auditors rather than another firm of accountants.
The Audit Committee, which consists entirely of independent non-executive directors, reviews and approves the level and type of non-audit work which the auditors perform, including the fees paid for such work, to ensure that the auditors objectivity and independence is not compromised.
F-15
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
5. Finance income/(cost)
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Deposits |
|
11.8 |
|
8.2 |
|
Expected return on pension scheme assets |
|
10.2 |
|
8.8 |
|
Finance income |
|
22.0 |
|
17.0 |
|
Loans and overdrafts |
|
(22.5 |
) |
(10.4 |
) |
Interest charge on pension scheme liabilities |
|
(10.3 |
) |
(9.5 |
) |
Finance cost |
|
(32.8 |
) |
(19.9 |
) |
6. Income tax
A taxation charge of 32.0% (2004: 33.3%) has been provided on the profit on underlying operations excluding the impact of intangible amortization of £15.9m (2004: £7.8m) and related deferred tax of £4.9m (2004: £2.8m). Including the impact of intangible amortization and related deferred tax the overall rate is 32.1% (2004: 33.2%).
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Current tax on profit from continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
current year |
|
67.3 |
|
129.3 |
|
prior years |
|
(4.0 |
) |
(3.5 |
) |
double tax relief |
|
(4.3 |
) |
(74.2 |
) |
|
|
59.0 |
|
51.6 |
|
Deferred tax on profit from continuing operationscurrent year |
|
(2.3 |
) |
0.9 |
|
Income tax on profit from continuing operations |
|
56.7 |
|
52.5 |
|
Current tax on profit from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
current year |
|
7.2 |
|
19.1 |
|
prior years |
|
(4.4 |
) |
(1.0 |
) |
double tax relief |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
2.8 |
|
17.5 |
|
Deferred tax on profit from discontinued operationscurrent year |
|
(0.3 |
) |
(1.3 |
) |
Income tax on profit from discontinued operations |
|
2.5 |
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Taxation credited to equity |
|
|
|
|
|
Current tax credit on exchange movements offset in reserves |
|
(5.5 |
) |
(0.1 |
) |
Deferred tax credit on share option charge and pension liability |
|
(10.0 |
) |
(4.2 |
) |
F-16
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
6. Income tax (Continued)
Factors affecting taxation charge for the year
The Group operates across the world and is subject to income tax in many different jurisdictions. The Group calculates its average expected tax rate as a weighted average of the national tax rates in the tax jurisdiction in which the Group operates. The differences are as follows:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Profit before income tax |
|
176.7 |
|
158.2 |
|
Taxation charge at weighted average |
|
57.6 |
|
53.9 |
|
Effects of: |
|
|
|
|
|
overseas state and local taxes |
|
2.2 |
|
1.7 |
|
adjustment to taxation charge in respect of prior years |
|
(4.2 |
) |
(2.4 |
) |
permanent differences |
|
1.8 |
|
(0.6 |
) |
(utilization of)/unrelieved tax losses |
|
(0.3 |
) |
0.7 |
|
other items |
|
(0.4 |
) |
(0.8 |
) |
Income tax on profit from continuing operations |
|
56.7 |
|
52.5 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Deferred tax in the income statement |
|
|
|
|
|
Accelerated capital allowances |
|
(0.1 |
) |
0.2 |
|
Pension liabilities |
|
3.3 |
|
2.8 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
(4.9 |
) |
(2.8 |
) |
Revalued properties |
|
(0.1 |
) |
(0.6 |
) |
Other |
|
(0.5 |
) |
1.3 |
|
Deferred tax on profit from continuing operations |
|
(2.3 |
) |
0.9 |
|
F-17
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
7. Discontinued operations
Following the demerger of Filtrona on June 6, 2005, this business has been presented as discontinued operations in accordance with IFRS 5 Non-current Assets Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations. There is no impact on the prior period financial statements other than a change in the presentation of Filtronas results and cash flows as discontinued operations.
|
|
2005* |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Revenue |
|
209.9 |
|
477.5 |
|
Operating profit |
|
8.1 |
|
53.8 |
|
Finance income |
|
3.4 |
|
8.0 |
|
Finance cost |
|
(4.8 |
) |
(9.9 |
) |
Profit before income tax |
|
6.7 |
|
51.9 |
|
Income tax |
|
(2.5 |
) |
(16.2 |
) |
Profit for the year |
|
4.2 |
|
35.7 |
|
* Represents the five months trading under the Companys ownership.
Profit from discontinued operations for the period to June 6, 2005 of £4.2m (year ended December 31, 2004: £35.7m) comprised North America £8.2m (2004: £14.6m), UK & Ireland £2.2m (2004: £7.9m), Continental Europe £4.1m (2004: £3.2m) and rest of the world £4.9m (2004: £10.0m). In the period to June 6, 2005, £15.2m (net of tax) of demerger costs were also incurred.
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Profit before income tax |
|
6.7 |
|
51.9 |
|
Adjustments for non-cash items: |
|
|
|
|
|
depreciation |
|
8.9 |
|
20.1 |
|
intangible amortization |
|
0.4 |
|
0.7 |
|
share option charge |
|
0.5 |
|
1.1 |
|
other |
|
(0.5 |
) |
4.8 |
|
Working capital movement |
|
(11.7 |
) |
(14.2 |
) |
Finance income |
|
(3.4 |
) |
(8.0 |
) |
Finance cost |
|
4.8 |
|
9.9 |
|
Special pension contribution |
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
Other cash movements |
|
(2.0 |
) |
(2.2 |
) |
Cash inflow from operating activities |
|
2.2 |
|
64.1 |
|
Income tax paid |
|
(2.8 |
) |
(14.9 |
) |
Net cash (outflow)/inflow from operating activities |
|
(0.6 |
) |
49.2 |
|
Net cash outflow from investing activities |
|
(12.3 |
) |
(56.0 |
) |
Net cash (outflow)/inflow from financing activities |
|
(35.1 |
) |
11.9 |
|
Exchange gain on cash and cash equivalents |
|
0.3 |
|
0.4 |
|
Net (decrease)/increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
(47.7 |
) |
5.5 |
|
The cash flow presented for discontinued operations includes demerger costs of £17.3m.
F-18
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
7. Discontinued operations (Continued)
The net assets of Filtrona that were demerged were £122.4m. As the divestment was accounted for as a demerger in the form of a dividend in specie, there was no gain or loss recognized in the income statement.
8. Earnings per share
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year attributable to the Company |
|
120.0 |
|
105.7 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
Profit for the year attributable to discontinued operations (net of minority interests) |
|
3.6 |
|
34.5 |
|
Basic weighted average ordinary shares in issue (million)* |
|
338.8 |
|
344.6 |
|
Dilutive effect of employee share plans (million)* |
|
1.7 |
|
1.3 |
|
Diluted weighted average ordinary shares (million)* |
|
340.5 |
|
345.9 |
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
35.4 |
p |
30.7 |
p |
Diluted basic earnings per share |
|
35.2 |
p |
30.5 |
p |
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
1.1 |
p |
10.0 |
p |
Diluted basic earnings per share |
|
1.1 |
p |
10.0 |
p |
* The weighted average number of shares has been adjusted for the share consolidation on June 6, 2005, as approved by shareholders at an Extraordinary General Meeting on June 2, 2005, when the ordinary shares of 25p were consolidated on a seven for nine basis into ordinary shares of 321¤7p. Figures for the prior year have been restated accordingly.
F-19
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
9. Property, plant and equipment
|
|
Land and |
|
Plant and |
|
Fixtures, |
|
2005 |
|
||||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||||
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year |
|
|
83.3 |
|
|
|
271.7 |
|
|
|
87.1 |
|
|
442.1 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
5.4 |
|
Additions |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
23.5 |
|
Disposals |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
(7.1 |
) |
Demerger of business |
|
|
(40.5 |
) |
|
|
(246.2 |
) |
|
|
(45.2 |
) |
|
(331.9 |
) |
Currency translation |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
16.8 |
|
End of year |
|
|
48.9 |
|
|
|
48.3 |
|
|
|
51.6 |
|
|
148.8 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
156.5 |
|
|
|
49.3 |
|
|
223.7 |
|
Charge in year |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
22.5 |
|
Disposals |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
(6.2 |
) |
Demerger of business |
|
|
(7.7 |
) |
|
|
(142.6 |
) |
|
|
(19.3 |
) |
|
(169.6 |
) |
Currency translation |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
8.6 |
|
End of year |
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
37.8 |
|
|
79.0 |
|
Net book value at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
|
69.8 |
|
|
|
Land and |
|
Plant and |
|
Fixtures, |
|
2004 |
|
||||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||||
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year |
|
|
75.3 |
|
|
|
256.9 |
|
|
|
80.1 |
|
|
412.3 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
20.1 |
|
Additions |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
46.2 |
|
Disposals |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
(12.3 |
) |
|
|
(6.0 |
) |
|
(21.9 |
) |
Currency translation |
|
|
(3.4 |
) |
|
|
(9.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
(14.6 |
) |
End of year |
|
|
83.3 |
|
|
|
271.7 |
|
|
|
87.1 |
|
|
442.1 |
|
Depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year |
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
151.7 |
|
|
|
47.9 |
|
|
215.8 |
|
Charge in year |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
33.0 |
|
Disposals |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
(5.8 |
) |
|
(18.0 |
) |
Currency translation |
|
|
(0.8 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
(7.1 |
) |
End of year |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
156.5 |
|
|
|
49.3 |
|
|
223.7 |
|
Net book value at December 31, 2004 |
|
|
65.4 |
|
|
|
115.2 |
|
|
|
37.8 |
|
|
218.4 |
|
Net book value at January 1, 2004 |
|
|
59.1 |
|
|
|
105.2 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
196.5 |
|
The net book value of property, plant and equipment includes assets held under finance leases and hire purchase contracts totalling £5.9m (2004: £6.2m). Accumulated depreciation of these assets amounts to £0.9m (2004: £0.8m). Future capital expenditure at December 31, 2005 consisted of commitments not provided for of £0.8m (2004: £0.3m).
F-20
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
10. Intangible assets
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
Net book value |
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year |
|
407.8 |
|
290.9 |
|
Additions |
|
41.8 |
|
118.7 |
|
Demerger of business |
|
(37.2 |
) |
|
|
Currency translation |
|
8.7 |
|
(1.8 |
) |
End of year |
|
421.1 |
|
407.8 |
|
Customer lists |
|
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year |
|
236.9 |
|
|
|
Additions |
|
82.8 |
|
230.8 |
|
Demerger of business |
|
(21.1 |
) |
|
|
Currency translation |
|
(0.5 |
) |
6.1 |
|
End of year |
|
298.1 |
|
236.9 |
|
Amortisation |
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year |
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
Charge in year |
|
16.3 |
|
8.5 |
|
Demerger of business |
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
Currency translation |
|
(0.3 |
) |
0.1 |
|
End of year |
|
23.7 |
|
8.6 |
|
Net book value at December 31 |
|
274.4 |
|
228.3 |
|
Total net book value of intangible assets at December 31 |
|
695.5 |
|
636.1 |
|
Both goodwill and customer lists have been acquired as part of business combinations. Customer lists are amortized over their estimated useful lives which range from 15 to 18 years.
11. Inventories
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Raw materials and consumables |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
Work-in-progress |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Finished goods and goods for resale |
|
272.3 |
|
250.0 |
|
|
|
272.3 |
|
275.2 |
|
£7.4m was written off inventory balances during the year (2004: £1.3m). The inventory provision at December 31, 2005 was £21.7m (2004: £25.9m).
F-21
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
12. Trade and other receivables
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Trade receivables |
|
370.4 |
|
374.4 |
|
Other receivables |
|
77.4 |
|
60.9 |
|
Prepayments and accrued income |
|
22.9 |
|
30.1 |
|
|
|
470.7 |
|
465.4 |
|
£3.2m was written off in respect of doubtful trade receivables during the year (2004: £2.6m). The provision for doubtful trade receivables at December 31, 2005 was £13.7m (2004: £13.5m).
13. Trade and other payablescurrent
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Trade payables |
|
341.4 |
|
307.6 |
|
Dividends |
|
16.5 |
|
18.5 |
|
Other taxation and social security contributions |
|
11.1 |
|
12.6 |
|
Other payables |
|
39.6 |
|
43.3 |
|
Accruals and deferred income |
|
89.0 |
|
87.3 |
|
|
|
497.6 |
|
469.3 |
|
14. Financial instruments
Treasury policies and controls
Bunzl has a centralized treasury department to control external borrowings and manage exchange rate risk and interest rate risk. Treasury policies are approved by the Board and cover the nature of the exposure to be hedged, the types of financial instruments that may be employed and the criteria for investing and borrowing cash. The Group uses derivatives only to manage its foreign currency and interest rate risks arising from underlying business activities. No transactions of a speculative nature are undertaken. The treasury department is subject to periodic independent reviews by the internal audit department. Underlying policy assumptions and activities are reviewed by the executive directors. Controls over exposure changes and transaction authenticity are in place and dealings are restricted to those banks with the relevant combination of geographic presence and suitable credit rating. The Group continually monitors the credit ratings of its counterparties and credit exposure to each counterparty.
The Groups objective is to maintain a balance between continuity of funding and flexibility. The Group is funded by a US dollar bond and multi-currency credit facilities from the Groups bankers. The US dollar bond, originally issued during 2001, is in three tranches, five years, seven years and 10 years with maturities between 2006 and 2011, for a total of $225 million at fixed rates of interest. The bank facilities have tenures ranging from six months to five years and mature between 2006 and 2010. At December 31, 2005, the available bank facilities totaled £687 million of which £246 million was drawn down. In addition the Group maintains overdraft and uncommitted facilities to provide short-term flexibility.
F-22
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
14. Financial instruments (Continued)
The majority of the Groups net assets are in currencies other than sterling. The Groups policy is to limit the translation exposure and resulting impact on shareholders equity by borrowing and/or using forward foreign exchange contracts to hedge the translation exposure in those currencies in which the Group has significant net assets. At December 31, 2005 there were no material currency exposures after accounting for the effect of the hedging transactions. Throughout the year, the Groups borrowings were primarily held in sterling and US dollars. The Group does not hedge the translation effect of exchange rate movements on the income statement.
The majority of the Groups transactions are carried out in the respective functional currency of each of the Groups operations and so transaction exposures are limited. However where they do occur the Groups policy is to hedge significant exposures as soon as they are committed using forward foreign exchange contracts.
The Groups strategy is to ensure with a reasonable amount of certainty that the overall Group interest charge is protected against material adverse movements in interest rates. The majority of the US dollar bond was swapped to floating rates during 2001. Interest rate caps are in place to reduce the Groups floating rate exposure to movements in LIBOR.
The Groups principal financial assets are cash and receivables which represent the Groups maximum exposure to credit risk in relation to financial assets.
The Groups credit risk is primarily attributable to its trade receivables. The amounts presented in the balance sheet are net of allowances for doubtful receivables, estimated by the Groups management based on prior experience and their assessment of the current economic environment.
The credit risk on cash and derivative financial instruments is limited because the Group restricts its dealings to counterparties with high credit ratings. The credit risk policy specifies the maximum permitted exposure to each counterparty.
At the balance sheet date there were no significant concentrations of credit risk.
The financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2004 have been prepared using the accounting policies previously applied under UK GAAP for financial instruments as the Group has adopted the IFRS 1 exemption not to apply IAS 32 and IAS 39 to the comparative period.
F-23
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
14. Financial instruments (Continued)
The adoption of IAS 32 and IAS 39 had the following impact on the balance sheet at January 1, 2005:
|
|
Non-current |
|
Current |
|
Current |
|
Non-current |
|
Current |
|
Equity |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||||||||||
At December 31, 2004 under IFRSexcluding IAS 32 and IAS 39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
290.2 |
|
|
|
179.5 |
|
|
|
488.8 |
|
|
IAS 32 and IAS 39 fair value adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
Foreign exchange contractscash flow hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
At January 1, 2005 under IFRSincluding IAS 32 and IAS 39 |
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
298.5 |
|
|
|
179.9 |
|
|
|
487.5 |
|
|
Fair value of financial assets and liabilities
|
|
Book value |
|
Fair value |
|
Book value |
|
Fair value |
|
||||||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||||||
Primary financial instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US dollar bond |
|
|
136.0 |
|
|
|
136.7 |
|
|
|
117.2 |
|
|
|
126.7 |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
246.0 |
|
|
|
246.0 |
|
|
|
335.9 |
|
|
|
335.9 |
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
(5.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
Interest rate caps |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contractscash flow hedge |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
Foreign exchange contractsnet investment hedge |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
382.2 |
|
|
|
382.9 |
|
|
|
459.6 |
|
|
|
461.7 |
|
|
Fair values of other financial assets and liabilities are approximately equal to book values. The unrealized gain on the interest rate derivatives at December 31, 2004 was £8.7m, of which £2.2m related to the year ended December 31, 2005 and £6.5m thereafter. Fair values have been calculated by discounting cash flows at the prevailing interest rates. The US dollar bond tranches comprise:
|
|
Maturity |
|
Fixed |
|
£m |
|
||||
Tranche 1 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
6.36 |
% |
|
43.9 |
|
Tranche 2 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
6.66 |
% |
|
60.7 |
|
Tranche 3 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
7.10 |
% |
|
31.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136.0 |
|
F-24
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
14. Financial instruments (Continued)
Maturity of financial liabilities
The maturity of the Groups financial liabilities at December 31 was as follows:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Within one year |
|
69.5 |
|
222.7 |
|
After one year but within two years |
|
1.0 |
|
71.4 |
|
After two years but within three years |
|
60.7 |
|
48.4 |
|
After three years but within four years |
|
|
|
117.6 |
|
After four years but within five years |
|
246.6 |
|
26.5 |
|
After five years |
|
31.4 |
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
409.2 |
|
512.9 |
|
The loans are drawn for various periods and at interest rates linked to LIBOR. Loans have been drawn under committed facilities and can be refinanced on maturity from these same facilities. Accordingly they have been aged based on the maturity dates of the underlying facilities. At December 31, 2005 there were no loans (2004: £0.5m) secured by either fixed or floating charges on various assets of the relevant companies.
The Group had available undrawn committed facilities at December 31, as follows:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Expiring within one year |
|
29.7 |
|
86.9 |
|
Expiring after one year but within two years |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
Expiring after two years |
|
411.5 |
|
398.4 |
|
|
|
441.2 |
|
506.2 |
|
Derivative financial instruments
The Group uses derivative financial instruments as part of its risk management strategies in relation to interest rate and foreign exchange risk as detailed below. All of these financial instruments are carried at fair value.
Interest rate swaps with a notional principal of £101.7m were outstanding at December 31, 2005 (2004: £91.1m). The interest rate swaps have swapped $175m of the $225m US dollar bond from fixed to floating rates. The interest rate is based on US dollar LIBOR repricing every three months. Financial liabilities with a notional principal of £211.1m were capped at December 31, 2005 (2004: £178.2m). Interest rate caps manage the interest rate risk of floating rate liabilities. The interest rate is based on US dollar and euro LIBOR and the LIBOR fixings are every three months. Hedge accounting is not applied to interest rate caps under IAS 39.
F-25
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
14. Financial instruments (Continued)
Hedge of net investment in foreign entity
The Group has dollar denominated borrowings which it has designated as a hedge of the net investment in its subsidiaries in the US. The book value of these dollar borrowings at December 31, 2005 was £136.0m (2004: £117.2m). The foreign exchange loss of £13.6m (2004: £8.5m gain) on translation of the borrowings into sterling has been recognized in a separate component of equity. The Group also has foreign currency forward contracts which it has designated as a hedge of the net investments in its subsidiaries primarily relating to the euro. The fair value of these contracts at December 31, 2005 was a liability of £5.9m (2004: £6.5m).
Currency profile of financial assets and liabilities
In the following tables short term debtors and creditors are excluded from the 2004 comparatives as permitted by FRS 13 Derivatives and Other Financial Instruments: Disclosures.
The interest rate and currency profile of the Groups financial assets at December 31, was:
Currency |
|
|
|
Floating |
|
Monetary |
|
Total |
|
Floating |
|
||||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||||||
Sterling |
|
|
15.1 |
|
|
|
122.4 |
|
|
137.5 |
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
||
US dollar |
|
|
24.4 |
|
|
|
174.9 |
|
|
199.3 |
|
|
38.4 |
|
|
||
Euro |
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
104.2 |
|
|
114.3 |
|
|
35.9 |
|
|
||
Other |
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
48.1 |
|
|
58.5 |
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
60.0 |
|
|
|
449.6 |
|
|
509.6 |
|
|
113.7 |
|
|
* Monetary working capital reflects financial amounts on which no interest is paid.
After taking into account interest rate swaps and foreign exchange swaps, the interest rate and currency profile of the Groups financial liabilities at December 31, was:
Currency |
|
|
|
Floating |
|
Fixed |
|
Monetary |
|
Impact of |
|
Total |
|
Floating |
|
Fixed |
|
Impact of |
|
Total |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||||||||||||||
Sterling |
|
|
262.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160.9 |
|
|
|
(524.4 |
) |
|
(101.3 |
) |
|
261.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(457.3 |
) |
|
(195.4 |
) |
||
US dollar |
|
|
106.5 |
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
166.5 |
|
|
|
144.8 |
|
|
446.9 |
|
|
197.6 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
57.8 |
|
|
281.4 |
|
||
Euro |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81.8 |
|
|
|
284.3 |
|
|
368.7 |
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
317.4 |
|
|
337.0 |
|
||
Other |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47.8 |
|
|
|
101.2 |
|
|
151.9 |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
88.6 |
|
|
89.9 |
|
||
|
|
|
374.2 |
|
|
|
29.1 |
|
|
|
457.0 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
866.2 |
|
|
480.4 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
512.9 |
|
* Monetary working capital reflects financial amounts on which no interest is paid.
F-26
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Current |
|
5.3 |
|
7.1 |
|
Non-current |
|
38.3 |
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
43.6 |
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
Properties |
|
Legal and |
|
Total |
|
Properties |
|
Legal and |
|
Total |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||||||||||
Movements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year |
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
24.8 |
|
|
Charge |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
20.0 |
|
|
Demerger of business |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Utilised |
|
|
(5.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
(4.9 |
) |
|
|
(9.3 |
) |
|
Currency translation |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
End of year |
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
27.3 |
|
|
|
43.6 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
22.6 |
|
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
The properties provision includes vacant properties where amounts are held against onerous lease commitments, repairs and dilapidations. These provisions cover the length of the lease agreements which typically extend for one to 10 years.
The Group holds provisions for expected legal, environmental and other claims that it expects to incur within the next one to five years. These costs are based on detailed plans and other known factors and to take account of past experience based on similar items.
The Group is a defendant in a number of legal proceedings incidental to its operations. While any litigation has an element of uncertainty, the Group does not expect that the outcome of such proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect upon the Groups financial condition or result of operations.
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
Asset |
|
Liability |
|
Net |
|
Asset |
|
Liability |
|
Net |
|
||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||
Accelerated capital allowances |
|
1.2 |
|
|
(3.5 |
) |
|
(2.3 |
) |
1.7 |
|
|
(13.1 |
) |
|
(11.4 |
) |
Pension liabilities |
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
21.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
21.5 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
(82.4 |
) |
|
(82.4 |
) |
|
|
|
(75.5 |
) |
|
(75.5 |
) |
Revalued properties |
|
|
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
(4.4 |
) |
Other |
|
21.4 |
|
|
(9.7 |
) |
|
11.7 |
|
24.8 |
|
|
(20.0 |
) |
|
4.8 |
|
Deferred tax asset/(liability) |
|
41.3 |
|
|
(98.4 |
) |
|
(57.1 |
) |
48.0 |
|
|
(113.0 |
) |
|
(65.0 |
) |
Set-off of tax |
|
(19.1 |
) |
|
19.1 |
|
|
|
|
(33.2 |
) |
|
33.2 |
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset/(liability) |
|
22.2 |
|
|
(79.3 |
) |
|
(57.1 |
) |
14.8 |
|
|
(79.8 |
) |
|
(65.0 |
) |
Deferred tax has been accounted for in respect of future remittances of the accumulated reserves of overseas subsidiary undertakings only to the extent that such distributions are accrued as receivable.
F-27
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
16. Deferred tax (Continued)
Deferred tax assets have only been recognized in respect of tax losses and other temporary differences giving rise to deferred tax assets because it is probable that these assets will be recovered. A deferred tax asset of £30.1m (2004: £33.9m) has not been recognized in respect of capital losses as the realisation of this deferred tax asset is not considered likely.
No deferred tax is recognized on the unremitted earnings of overseas subsidiaries as it is not expected that the distribution of overseas earnings will give rise to a tax liability.
Deferred tax is calculated in full on temporary differences under the liability method using a tax rate of the country of operation.
The movement on the net deferred tax liability is shown below.
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Beginning of year |
|
65.0 |
|
(1.3 |
) |
Acquisitions |
|
12.7 |
|
71.8 |
|
Charge to income statement |
|
(2.6 |
) |
(0.4 |
) |
Charge to equity |
|
(10.0 |
) |
(4.2 |
) |
Demerger of business |
|
(8.7 |
) |
|
|
Other |
|
0.7 |
|
(0.9 |
) |
End of year |
|
57.1 |
|
65.0 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Authorised: 529 million ordinary shares of 321¤7 p each (2004: 680 million ordinary shares of 25p each) |
|
170.0 |
|
170.0 |
|
Issued and fully paid ordinary shares of 321¤7 p each |
|
111.4 |
|
112.5 |
|
Number of ordinary shares in issue and fully paid |
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning of year |
|
349,966,186 |
* |
348,712,350 |
* |
Issued on option exercises |
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2004 December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
1,253,836 |
* |
January 1, 2005 June 5, 2005 |
|
1,347,152 |
* |
|
|
June 6, 2005 December 31, 2005 |
|
4,916,148 |
|
|
|
Issued on acquisition of Sanicare Pty Ltd |
|
492,966 |
|
|
|
Cancellation of own shares |
|
(10,138,322 |
)* |
|
|
End of year |
|
346,584,130 |
|
349,966,186 |
|
* The 2004 comparative information and 2005 prior to June 6, 2005 has been restated for the Bunzl plc share consolidation following the demerger of Filtrona on June 6, 2005 (using a ratio of seven new Bunzl shares of 321/7p each for nine old Bunzl shares of 25p each).
F-28
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
17. Share capital (Continued)
Details of share options which have been granted and exercised and those which have lapsed during 2005 and those outstanding at December 31, 2005, in each case in respect of options and awards over new issue shares, under the Companys Sharesave Scheme (1991), Sharesave Scheme (2001), International Sharesave Plan, 1994 Executive Share Option Scheme and Long Term Incentive Plan Part A and Part B are set out in the following table:
|
|
Options |
|
Grants/ |
|
Exercises 2005 |
|
Lapses |
|
Options outstanding at |
|
Options |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Number |
|
Number |
|
Price (p) |
|
Number |
|
Price (p) |
|
Number |
|
Number |
|
Price (p) |
|
Number |
|
||||||||||||||
Sharesave Scheme (1991) |
|
|
454,264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
324,421 |
|
|
224-365 |
|
|
63,737 |
|
|
66,106 |
|
|
|
308-365 |
|
|
|
21,907 |
|
|
Sharesave Scheme (2001) |
|
|
2,689,263 |
|
|
|
288,178 |
|
|
|
437 |
|
|
744,732 |
|
|
296-389 |
|
|
736,615 |
|
|
1,496,094 |
|
|
|
296-437 |
|
|
|
10,817 |
|
|
International Sharesave Plan |
|
|
218,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,087 |
|
|
296-389 |
|
|
51,366 |
|
|
69,109 |
|
|
|
296-389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1994 Executive Scheme |
|
|
8,992,263 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,205,460 |
|
|
212-461 |
|
|
191,500 |
|
|
3,595,503 |
|
|
|
229-461 |
|
|
|
2,329,503 |
|
|
LTIP Part A |
|
|
1,429,000 |
|
|
|
82,500 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
275,500 |
|
|
428.75 |
|
|
56,500 |
|
|
1,179,500 |
|
|
|
428.75-568 |
|
|
|
83,500 |
|
|
LTIP Part B |
|
|
206,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,989,602 |
|
|
|
370,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,648,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
1,099,718 |
|
|
6,612,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,445,727 |
|
|
|
|
Weighted average |
|
Weighted average |
|
||||
|
|
(£) |
|
(years) |
|
||||
Sharesave Scheme (2001) |
|
|
1.61 |
|
|
|
3.75 |
|
|
LTIP Part A |
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
2.39 |
|
|
LTIP Part B |
|
|
3.57 |
|
|
|
2.39 |
|
|
The outstanding options and awards are exercisable at various dates up to September 2015.
` |
|
Per share |
|
Total |
|
||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
2003 final |
|
|
|
8.25 |
p |
|
|
37.0 |
|
2004 interim |
|
|
|
4.15 |
p |
|
|
18.5 |
|
2004 final |
|
9.15 |
p |
|
|
39.3 |
|
|
|
2005 interim |
|
4.9 |
p |
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
14.05 |
p |
12.4 |
p |
55.8 |
|
55.5 |
|
The 2005 final dividend of 10.8p will be paid on July 3, 2006 to shareholders on the register on May 5, 2006.
Total dividends for the year to which they relate are:
|
|
Per share |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Interim |
|
4.9 |
p |
4.15 |
p |
Final |
|
10.8 |
p |
9.15 |
p |
|
|
15.7 |
p |
13.3 |
p |
F-29
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
19. Movement in reserves
|
|
Share |
|
Share |
|
Merger |
|
Capital |
|
Cash flow |
|
Translation |
|
Retained |
|
Total |
|
Minority |
|
Total |
|
||||||||||||||||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||||||||||||||||
At January 1, 2005 |
|
|
112.5 |
|
|
|
88.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
278.1 |
|
|
484.9 |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
488.8 |
|
|
Adoption of IAS 32 and IAS 39cash flow hedging reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
At January 1, 2005 |
|
|
112.5 |
|
|
|
88.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
278.1 |
|
|
483.6 |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
487.5 |
|
|
Currency translation differences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
Movement of cash flow hedging position |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
Actuarial loss on pension schemes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27.3 |
) |
|
(27.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(27.3 |
) |
|
Deferred taxation on actuarial loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
Net profit for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123.6 |
|
|
123.6 |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
124.2 |
|
|
Total recognized income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
|
|
104.7 |
|
|
114.1 |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
115.0 |
|
|
2004 final dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39.3 |
) |
|
(39.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(39.3 |
) |
|
2005 interim dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(16.5 |
) |
|
Issue of share capital |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
24.5 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.2 |
|
|
Cancellation of own shares |
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of employee trust shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
|
Amortization of employee trust shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
Share based payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
Tax on share based |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
Demerger of business* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(117.6 |
) |
|
(117.6 |
) |
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(122.4 |
) |
|
At December 31, 2005 |
|
|
111.4 |
|
|
|
112.8 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
216.3 |
|
|
460.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
460.4 |
|
|
At January 1, 2004 |
|
|
112.1 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266.9 |
|
|
468.1 |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
471.1 |
|
|
Currency translation differences |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
Actuarial loss on pension schemes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.3 |
) |
|
(13.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(13.3 |
) |
|
Deferred taxation on actuarial loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
Net profit for the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140.2 |
|
|
140.2 |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
141.4 |
|
|
Total recognized income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
130.9 |
|
|
131.6 |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
132.5 |
|
|
2003 final dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37.0 |
) |
|
(37.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(37.0 |
) |
|
2004 interim dividend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
|
(18.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(18.9 |
) |
|
Issue of share capital |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
Purchase of own shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58.6 |
) |
|
(58.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(58.6 |
) |
|
Purchase of employee trust shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
|
(9.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(9.8 |
) |
|
Amortization of employee trust shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
Share based payments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
Movement in pension asset revaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
At December 31, 2004 |
|
|
112.5 |
|
|
|
88.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
278.1 |
|
|
484.9 |
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
488.8 |
|
|
* The demerger of business has been effected by a divestment in the form of a dividend in specie.
F-30
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
19. Movement in reserves (Continued)
Within retained earnings are ordinary shares of the Company held by the Group in an employee benefit trust. The principal purpose of this trust is to hold shares in the Company for subsequent transfer to certain senior employees and executive directors relating to options granted and awards made in respect of market purchase shares under the Long Term Incentive Plan, the Deferred Annual Share Bonus Scheme and the 1994 Executive Share Option Scheme. Details of such plans and schemes are set out in Note 24 and in the Directors Remuneration Report on pages A-1 to A-13. The assets, liabilities and expenditure of the trust have been incorporated in the Groups financial statements. At December 31, 2005 the trust held 8,121,342 (2004: 6,951,506) shares, upon which dividends have been waived, with an aggregate nominal value of £2.6m (2004: £2.2m) and market value of £51.8m (2004: £39.7m).
Restated for the Bunzl plc share consolidation following the demerger of Filtrona on June 6, 2005 (using a ratio of seven new Bunzl shares of 321¤7p each for nine old Bunzl shares of 25p each).
20. Contingent liabilities
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||
Bank guarantees |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
Other items |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
Other items principally comprise trade and other guarantees entered into in the normal course of business. Provision is made for any amounts that the directors consider may become payable under such arrangements.
21. Directors ordinary share interests
The interests of the directors at December 31 in the share capital of the Company according to the register of directors interests were:
|
|
12.31.05 |
|
1.1.05* |
|
A.J. Habgood |
|
123,577 |
|
248,577 |
|
M.J. Roney |
|
13,888 |
|
3,888 |
|
D.M. Williams |
|
98,104 |
|
97,199 |
|
J.F. Harris |
|
2,625 |
|
2,544 |
|
C.A. Banks |
|
3,888 |
|
3,888 |
|
U. Wolters |
|
5,000 |
|
2,333 |
|
P.L. Larmon |
|
11,835 |
|
3,888 |
|
|
|
258,917 |
|
362,317 |
|
* The comparative information has been restated for the share consolidation following the demerger of Filtrona (using a ratio of seven new Bunzl shares of 321¤7p for nine old Bunzl shares of 25p).
The share interests shown above include the non-beneficial interests of Mr. A.J. Habgood in 16,644 ordinary shares and Mr. D.M. Williams in 12,359 ordinary shares. Details of directors options over ordinary shares and awards made under Companys Long Term Incentive Plan and Deferred Annual Share Bonus Scheme are set out in the Directors Remuneration Report on pages A-1 to A-13. Since December 31, 2005 Mr. J.F. Harris and Mr. P.L. Larmon have acquired interests in 19 and 71 ordinary
F-31
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
21. Directors ordinary share interests (Continued)
shares respectively as a result of their electing to participate in the dividend reinvestment plan in respect of the interim dividend which was paid on January 3, 2006 and Mr. P.L. Larmon has acquired an interest in 287 ordinary shares (in the form of 57.4 American Depository Receipts) pursuant to the Companys U.S. Stock Purchase Plan and dividend reinvestment plan. No other changes to the directors ordinary share interests shown in this Note and the Directors Remuneration Report on Pages A-1 to A-13 have taken place between December 31, 2005 and February 27, 2006.
22. Pensions
The Group accounts for pension costs in accordance with IAS 19. The Group operates both defined benefit and defined contribution pension schemes. The funds of the principal schemes are administered by trustees and are held independently from the Group. Pension costs of defined benefit schemes are assessed in accordance with the advice of independent professionally qualified actuaries. Full triennial actuarial valuations were carried out on the principal European defined benefit schemes in April 2003 and annual actuarial valuations are performed on the principal US defined benefit schemes. Contributions to all schemes are determined in line with actuarial advice, local conditions and practices. The most recent actuarial valuations have incorporated the requirements of IAS 19 in assessing scheme liabilities at December 31, 2005. Scheme assets for the purpose of IAS 19 are stated at their bid value.
The amounts included in the financial statements are as follows:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Amounts charged to the income statementGroup |
|
|
|
|
|
Defined contribution schemes |
|
7.0 |
|
8.6 |
|
Defined benefit schemesservice cost |
|
6.2 |
|
7.4 |
|
Total operating charge |
|
13.2 |
|
16.0 |
|
Amounts included as other finance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
Expected return on pension scheme assets |
|
(13.5 |
) |
(16.0 |
) |
Interest charge on pension scheme liabilities |
|
13.5 |
|
16.6 |
|
Net financial return |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
Total charge |
|
13.2 |
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Amounts recognized in the statement of recognized income and expense |
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return less expected return on scheme assets |
|
15.8 |
|
7.8 |
|
Experience gain/(loss) on scheme liabilities |
|
0.4 |
|
(3.6 |
) |
Impact of changes in assumptions relating to the present value of scheme liabilities |
|
(43.5 |
) |
(17.5 |
) |
Actuarial loss recognized in the statement of recognized income and expense |
|
(27.3 |
) |
(13.3 |
) |
The cumulative amount of actuarial losses recognized in the statement of recognized income and expense at the end of the year was £40.6m (2004: £13.3m).
F-32
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
22. Pensions (Continued)
The principal assumptions used by the independent qualified actuaries for the purposes of IAS 19 were:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Europe |
|
|
|
|
|
Longevity at age 65 for current pensioners (years) |
|
18.5 |
|
17.5 |
|
Longevity at age 65 for future pensioners (years) |
|
20.0 |
|
19.0 |
|
The mortality assumptions used by the actuaries for the US pension schemes have been taken from Group Annuity Mortality tables.
|
|
Europe |
|
US |
|
||||||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
||
Rate of increase in salaries |
|
3.75 |
% |
3.75 |
% |
3.75 |
% |
4.0 |
% |
|
4.0 |
% |
|
5.0 |
% |
Rate of increase in pensions |
|
2.75 |
% |
2.75 |
% |
2.75 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
4.8 |
% |
5.3 |
% |
5.5 |
% |
5.75 |
% |
|
6.0 |
% |
|
6.25 |
% |
Inflation rate |
|
2.75 |
% |
2.75 |
% |
2.75 |
% |
2.5 |
% |
|
2.5 |
% |
|
2.5 |
% |
The assumptions used by the actuaries are the best estimates chosen from a range of possible actuarial assumptions which, due to the timescale covered, may not necessarily be borne out in practice.
The market value of the scheme assets, which are not intended to be realized in the short term and may be subject to significant change before they are realised, and the present value of the obligations, which are derived from cash flow projections over long periods and are therefore inherently uncertain, are:
|
|
Europe* |
|
US |
|
Total |
|
||||||||
|
|
Long term |
|
Value |
|
Long term |
|
Value |
|
2005 |
|
||||
Value |
|||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
£m |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||
Equities |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
91.3 |
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
29.7 |
|
121.0 |
|
Bonds |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
44.9 |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
12.0 |
|
56.9 |
|
Other |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
0.8 |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
0.3 |
|
1.1 |
|
Blended rate of return on assets |
|
|
5.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
8.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total market value |
|
|
|
|
|
137.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
42.0 |
|
179.0 |
|
Present value of funded obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
(181.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(54.2 |
) |
(235.9 |
) |
Present value of unfunded obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
Present value of funded and unfunded obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
(184.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(54.2 |
) |
(239.0 |
) |
Deficit |
|
|
|
|
|
(47.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(12.2 |
) |
(60.0 |
) |
Deferred taxation |
|
|
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
18.7 |
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
(33.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(7.9 |
) |
(41.3 |
) |
* The European returns on assets are based on the weighted average across all European pension schemes.
F-33
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
22. Pensions (Continued)
|
|
Europe* |
|
US |
|
Total |
|
||||||||
|
|
Long term |
|
Value |
|
Long term |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
||||
Equities |
|
|
7.0 |
% |
|
127.1 |
|
|
9.8 |
% |
|
43.3 |
|
170.4 |
|
Bonds |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
65.2 |
|
|
5.8 |
% |
|
17.4 |
|
82.6 |
|
Other |
|
|
4.4 |
% |
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
Blended rate of return on assets |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total market value |
|
|
|
|
|
197.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
60.7 |
|
258.0 |
|
Present value of funded obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
(252.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(73.0 |
) |
(325.5 |
) |
Present value of unfunded obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
Present value of funded and unfunded obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
(255.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(73.0 |
) |
(328.5 |
) |
Deficit |
|
|
|
|
|
(58.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(12.3 |
) |
(70.5 |
) |
Deferred taxation |
|
|
|
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
21.5 |
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
(41.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(8.0 |
) |
(49.0 |
) |
|
|
Europe* |
|
US |
|
Total |
|
||||||||
|
|
Long term |
|
Value |
|
Long term |
|
Value |
|
Value |
|
||||
Equities |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
114.4 |
|
|
9.7 |
% |
|
42.1 |
|
156.5 |
|
Bonds |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
48.8 |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
|
16.3 |
|
65.1 |
|
Other |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
Blended rate of return on assets |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
8.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Total market value |
|
|
|
|
|
168.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
58.4 |
|
226.5 |
|
Present value of funded obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
(216.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(69.4 |
) |
(285.6 |
) |
Deficit |
|
|
|
|
|
(48.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(11.0 |
) |
(59.1 |
) |
Deferred taxation |
|
|
|
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
18.3 |
|
Pension liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
(33.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(7.1 |
) |
(40.8 |
) |
* The European returns on assets are based on the weighted average across all European pension schemes.
The 2003 market value of scheme assets and the present value of the obligations are stated under UK GAAP. The closing net deficit for 2003 of £59.1m when revalued under IFRS is £59.8m.
F-34
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Movement in deficit during the year
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Beginning of year |
|
(70.5 |
) |
(59.8 |
) |
Current service cost |
|
(6.2 |
) |
(7.4 |
) |
Contributions |
|
11.6 |
|
13.0 |
|
Demerger of business |
|
32.4 |
|
|
|
Net financial return |
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Actuarial loss |
|
(27.3 |
) |
(13.3 |
) |
Currency translation |
|
|
|
(2.4 |
) |
End of year |
|
(60.0 |
) |
(70.5 |
) |
Changes in the present value of the defined benefit obligation
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Beginning of year |
|
328.5 |
|
285.6 |
|
Current service cost |
|
6.2 |
|
7.4 |
|
Interest on scheme liabilities |
|
13.5 |
|
16.6 |
|
Contributions by employees |
|
1.5 |
|
2.4 |
|
Actuarial losses |
|
43.1 |
|
21.1 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
(5.7 |
) |
(10.2 |
) |
Demerger of business |
|
(153.7 |
) |
|
|
Currency translation |
|
5.6 |
|
5.6 |
|
End of year |
|
239.0 |
|
328.5 |
|
Changes in the fair value of plan assets
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Beginning of year |
|
258.0 |
|
225.8 |
|
Expected return of scheme assets |
|
13.5 |
|
16.0 |
|
Actuarial gain |
|
15.8 |
|
7.8 |
|
Contributions by employer |
|
11.6 |
|
13.0 |
|
Contributions by employees |
|
1.5 |
|
2.4 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
(5.7 |
) |
(10.2 |
) |
Demerger of business |
|
(121.3 |
) |
|
|
Currency translation |
|
5.6 |
|
3.2 |
|
Fair value of the plan assets at end of year |
|
179.0 |
|
258.0 |
|
The actual return on plan assets was £29.3m (2004: £23.8m).
A triennial valuation of the UK defined benefit pension scheme is planned for 2006. Subject to the results of the valuation the Company estimates that the contributions to the scheme in 2006 will not be materially different from those in 2005.
F-35
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2004 |
|
||||||||
The number of persons employed by the Group at December 31 and the average number employed during the year were: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
North America |
|
|
3,454 |
|
|
|
3,058 |
|
|
|
2,802 |
|
|
|
2,735 |
|
|
||
UK & Ireland |
|
|
3,780 |
|
|
|
3,819 |
|
|
|
3,742 |
|
|
|
3,286 |
|
|
||
Continental Europe |
|
|
2,794 |
|
|
|
2,567 |
|
|
|
2,476 |
|
|
|
2,175 |
|
|
||
Australasia |
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
10,466 |
|
|
|
9,846 |
|
|
|
9,393 |
|
|
|
8,523 |
|
|
||
Corporate |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
10,526 |
|
|
|
9,907 |
|
|
|
9,455 |
|
|
|
8,586 |
|
|
Employee costs |
|
|
|
Total |
|
Total |
|
Wages and salaries |
|
253.1 |
|
215.8 |
|
||
Social security costs |
|
29.2 |
|
21.7 |
|
||
Share based payments |
|
3.6 |
|
2.8 |
|
||
Pension costs |
|
11.0 |
|
10.5 |
|
||
|
|
296.9 |
|
250.8 |
|
Key management remuneration |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||
Salaries and short term employee benefits |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
||
Post-employment benefits |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
||
Share based payments |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
The Group considers key management personnel as defined in IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures to be the directors of the Company and those members of the Executive Committee and the Managing Directors of the major operating segments who are not directors. The amounts disclosed are on the same basis as those used to determine the relevant amounts disclosed in the Directors Remuneration Report on pages A-1 to A-13.
Directors emoluments |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||
Total emoluments of the directors of the Company were: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Non-executive directors |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
||
Executive directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
remuneration excluding performance related elements |
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
||
annual cash bonus |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
||
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
More detailed information concerning directors emoluments and long term incentives is set out in the Directors Remuneration Report on pages A-1 to A-13. The aggregate amount of gains made by directors on the exercise of share options during the year was £3.9m (2004: £0.3m). The aggregate market value of awards exercised by directors under long term incentive schemes during the year was £0.7m (2004: £0.4m).
F-36
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
The Company operates the following share schemes and plans for the benefit of its employees relating to the acquisition of shares from the Company.
Sharesave Schemes (1991) (Sharesave Scheme)
The Sharesave Scheme, approved by shareholders at the 1991 Annual General Meeting, is approved by the UK Inland Revenue and was open to all UK employees, including the UK based executive directors, who had completed at least one year of continuous service. No further options have been granted under the Sharesave Scheme since it expired in May 2001. It is linked to a contract for monthly savings of up to £250 per month over a period of either three or five years. Under the Sharesave Scheme options were granted to participating employees at a discount of up to 20% to the market price prevailing on the day immediately preceding the date of invitation to apply for the option. Options are normally exercisable either three or five years after they have been granted.
Sharesave Scheme (2001) (2001 Sharesave Scheme)
The 2001 Sharesave Scheme was approved by shareholders at the 2001 Annual General Meeting and has replaced the Sharesave Scheme. The 2001 Sharesave Scheme is also approved by the UK Inland Revenue. It operates on a similar basis to the Sharesave Scheme as summarized above.
International Sharesave Plan (International Sharesave Plan)
The International Sharesave Plan was introduced following the approval of the 2001 Sharesave Scheme by shareholders. It operates on a similar basis to the 2001 Sharesave Scheme save that it is linked to a contract for monthly savings of up to 400 per month (or equivalent in other currencies) over a period of three years and options are granted to participating employees at a discount of up to 20% to the market price prevailing five days before the date of invitation to apply for the option.
1994 Executive Share Option Scheme (1994 Scheme)
The 1994 Scheme was approved by shareholders at the 1994 Annual General Meeting. No further options have been granted under the 1994 Scheme since it expired in May 2004. A performance condition, based on the Companys adjusted earnings per share growth relative to UK inflation over three years, has to be satisfied before options may normally be exercised.
Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP)
The LTIP was approved by shareholders at the 2004 Annual General Meeting and replaces the 1994 Scheme. The LTIP is divided into two parts.
Part A allows the Board to grant share options. In normal circumstances options granted are only exercisable if the relevant performance condition has been satisfied. Share options granted to date have a performance condition attached based on the Companys adjusted earnings per share growth relative to UK inflation over three years.
Part B of the LTIP allows the Board to award performance shares which is a conditional right to receive shares in the Company for no or nominal consideration. A performance share award will normally vest (i.e. become exercisable) on the third anniversary of its grant to the extent that the applicable performance condition has been satisfied. The extent to which performance share awards vest will be
F-37
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
24. Share based payments (Continued)
subject to the Companys total shareholder return (TSR) performance over a three year period relative to the TSR performance of a specified peer group of companies.
Details of the share schemes and plans operated by the Company are set out in the Directors Remuneration Report on pages A-1 to A-13.
Options have been valued using the Black Scholes valuation model. The fair value per option granted during the year and the assumptions used in the calculation are as follows:
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
Grant date |
|
03.01.05-11.01.05 |
|
03.03.04-10.12.04 |
|
Share price at grant date (£) |
|
5.00-5.69 |
|
4.25-4.61 |
|
Exercise price (£) |
|
nil-5.69 |
|
nil-4.61 |
|
Shares granted during the year |
|
4,301,156 |
|
4,196,071 |
|
Vesting period (years) |
|
3-5 |
|
3-5 |
|
Expected volatility (%) |
|
22-24 |
|
24-28 |
|
Option life (years) |
|
3-10 |
|
3-10 |
|
Expected life (years) |
|
3.0-3.9 |
|
3.0-3.8 |
|
Risk free rate of return (%) |
|
4.1-4.7 |
|
4.7-5.0 |
|
Expected dividends expressed as a dividend yield (%) |
|
2.6-3.0 |
|
3.0-3.2 |
|
Possibility of options lapsing (%) |
|
26-49 |
|
27-49 |
|
Fair value per option (£) |
|
0.72-1.95 |
|
0.56-1.38 |
|
The expected volatility is based on historical volatility over the last three to five years. The expected life is the average expected period to exercise. The risk free rate of return is the yield on zero coupon UK government bonds of a term consistent with the assumed option life.
The weighted average share price for options exercised over the year was £5.35 (2004: £4.44). The total charge for the year for continuing operations relating to employee share based payments was £3.6m (2004: £2.8m), all of which related to equity settled share based payments. After deferred tax the total charge for continuing operations was £1.7m (2004: £2.8m).
25. Operating lease commitmentsminimum lease payments
|
|
Land & |
|
Other |
|
Land & |
|
Other |
|
||||||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||||||
At December 31 the Group had the following commitments under non-cancellable operating leases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expiring within one year |
|
|
19.3 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
|
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
expiring between one and five years |
|
|
60.6 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
63.3 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
expiring after five years |
|
|
43.5 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
45.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
123.4 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
|
|
131.4 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
|
F-38
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
26. Cash and cash equivalents and net debt
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Cash at bank and in hand |
|
48.4 |
|
78.4 |
|
Short term deposits repayable on demand |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
Bank overdrafts |
|
(17.0 |
) |
(43.2 |
) |
Cash |
|
31.4 |
|
44.0 |
|
Short term deposits repayable in less than three months |
|
5.3 |
|
20.5 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
36.7 |
|
64.5 |
|
Current liabilitiesinterest bearing loans and borrowings |
|
(52.5 |
) |
(179.5 |
) |
Non-current liabilitiesinterest bearing loans and borrowings |
|
(339.7 |
) |
(290.2 |
) |
Net debt |
|
(355.5 |
) |
(405.2 |
) |
27. Acquisitions
The principal acquisitions made during the year were Gelpa, Tecep, Sanicare, SOFCO, A W Mendenhall, Retail Resources and Weiss Brothers. Gelpa, a distributor principally supplying the retail and food processor sectors in the Netherlands with packaging and consumables, was purchased on January 28. Tecep, a French holding company with operations primarily serving retail, foodservice, catering and food processing markets in Central Europe with packaging supplies and food processing equipment, was purchased on July 1. Sanicare, a supplier of disposal products principally into the healthcare sector across Australia and New Zealand, was purchased on July 29. SOFCO, a distributor to a number of sectors in the US including grocery, foodservice and healthcare, was purchased on September 3. A W Mendenhall, a supplier of foodservice, janitorial, industrial packaging and disposal products in the US, was purchased on September 26. Retail Resources, a provider of distribution services to non-food retail stores across the US, was purchased on October 7. Weiss Brothers, a supplier of goods not for resale to supermarkets as well as a distributor to the food processor sector in the US, was purchased on October 14.
During the period between December 31, 2005 and February 27, 2006, two further acquisitions have taken place. Master Craft Packaging, a company serving the redistribution and food service sectors in the US, was acquired on January 25, 2006. The Midshires Group, a business principally engaged in the operation and sale of vending machines and associated services throughout Central England, was acquired on January 31, 2006.
Acquisitions have been accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting and contributed £4.4m to operating profit in 2005. All 2005 acquisitions, as well as the two reported 2006 acquisitions, involved the purchase of 100% of the acquirees share capital or, as the case may be, all of the relevant assets of the businesses acquired. On acquisition the assets and liabilities of the businesses acquired were adjusted to reflect their fair values to the Group. This has included the separate identification of intangible assets in accordance with IFRS 3. As permitted under IFRS 3 these provisional fair values will be finalised within the 12 month period from the relevant date of acquisition.
The provisional fair values applied in the prior year to the acquisitions made in 2004 have been finalised during 2005. Adjustments were made to provisions to reflect more accurately the conditions at the date of acquisition based on information and knowledge which came to light during the 12 month post acquisition period. Adjustments have also been made to reflect the associated taxation effects. The net impact on acquired net assets reported in 2004 from these adjustments was £8.8m.
F-39
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
27. Acquisitions (Continued)
When assessing the fair value of assets acquired, the Group has made adjustments to property, plant and equipment, inventories, receivables and payables to reflect the estimated realizable or settlement value. To date the Company has recognized customers lists and relationships as separately identifiable intangible assets. Finally, adjustments have been made to accruals and provisions to include amounts in respect of onerous contracts and other commitments that existed at the acquisition date. The accounting policies of the acquired businesses have been brought into line with those of the Group with adjustments made where necessary. All of the provisional fair value adjustments have been made net of any relevant tax effects.
The purchase price for the acquisitions has been allocated against the identified net assets, with the balance recorded as goodwill. The acquisitions provide opportunities for further development of the Groups activities and in most cases create enhanced returns. Such opportunities and the workforces inherent in each of the acquired businesses do not translate to separately identifiable intangible assets but do represent much of the assessed value that supports the recognized goodwill.
|
|
Provisional fair value adjustments |
|
||||||||||||||
|
|
Book value at |
|
Revaluation |
|
Consistency |
|
Fair value of |
|
||||||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||||||
A summary of the effect of acquisitions is detailed below: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
82.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82.8 |
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
(1.4 |
) |
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
Trade and other receivables |
|
|
33.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
33.1 |
|
|
Trade and other payables |
|
|
(25.7 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26.9 |
) |
|
Net bank overdrafts |
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6.2 |
) |
|
Provisions for liabilities and charges |
|
|
(2.0 |
) |
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11.4 |
) |
|
Deferred taxation |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(14.0 |
) |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(12.7 |
) |
|
Taxation |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
(3.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
56.4 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
80.9 |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.8 |
|
|
Consideration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122.7 |
|
|
Satisfied by: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118.2 |
|
|
Share issue* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
Deferred consideration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122.7 |
|
|
The net cash outflow in the year in respect of acquisitions comprised: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash consideration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118.2 |
|
|
Net bank overdrafts acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
Net cash outflow in respect of acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
124.4 |
|
|
* The fair value of the shares issued as consideration as part of the Sanicare acquisitions consisted of 492,966 Bunzl plc shares at the quoted mid-market price of 518.83p per share at the time of the transaction.
F-40
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
27. Acquisitions (Continued)
The estimated results of operations, as if the principal acquisitions had been made at the beginning of the year are as follows:
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
Group |
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
270.0 |
|
Operating profit |
|
5.7 |
|
28. Related party disclosures
The Group has identified the directors of the Company, its key management and the Group pension schemes as related parties for the purpose of IAS 24 Related Party Disclosures. Details of the relevant relationships are disclosed in the Directors Remuneration Report on pages A-1 to A-13, Note 23 and Note 22, respectively.
29. Reconciliation of UK GAAP profit to IFRS profit for the year ended December 31, 2004
As stated in Note 1 these are the Groups first consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with IFRS.
The accounting policies set out in Note 2 have been applied in preparing the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005, the comparative information for the year ended December 31, 2004 and the opening IFRS balance sheet at January 1, 2004.
In preparing the IFRS balance sheet the Group has adjusted amounts reported previously in financial statements prepared in accordance with UK GAAP. An explanation of how the transition from UK GAAP to IFRS has affected the Groups financial position and financial performance is set out in the following tables and the notes that accompany the tables.
|
|
Continuing |
|
Discontinued |
|
Total |
|
||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||
Profit for the year ended December 31, 2004 under UK GAAP |
|
|
91.4 |
|
|
|
37.2 |
|
|
128.6 |
|
Net impact of amortization on goodwill and intangibles |
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
16.6 |
|
Recognition of fair value adjustments outside investigative period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
(2.2 |
) |
Deferred tax on previously revalued land and buildings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
0.7 |
|
Release of deferred tax recognized on intangibles |
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
2.8 |
|
Share based payments (net of taxation) |
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
(3.8 |
) |
Impairment of previously revalued land and buildings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
(1.3 |
) |
Profit for the year ended December 31, 2004 under IFRS |
|
|
105.7 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
141.4 |
|
F-41
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Reconciliation of UK GAAP equity to IFRS equity
|
|
Share |
|
Share |
|
Capital |
|
Translation |
|
Revaluation |
|
Retained |
|
Total |
|
Minority |
|
Total |
|
|||||||||||||||||||
At January 1, 2004 under UK GAAP |
|
|
112.1 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
229.5 |
|
|
|
432.0 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
434.8 |
|
|
|
IFRS adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reclassification of opening fair value reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pension asset revaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
deferred tax liabilities on property revaluations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
deferred tax asset on share options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
undeclared dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
37.0 |
|
|
|
At January 1, 2004 under IFRS |
|
|
112.1 |
|
|
|
83.8 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
266.9 |
|
|
|
468.1 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
471.1 |
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004 under UK GAAP |
|
|
112.5 |
|
|
|
88.3 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222.0 |
|
|
|
428.1 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
431.8 |
|
|
|
IFRS adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
net impact of amortization on goodwill and intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
recognition of fair value adjustments outside investigative period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
|
pension asset revaluation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
deferred tax liabilities on property revaluations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
deferred tax asset on share options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
deferred tax liabilities on business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
combination intangibles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
undeclared dividends |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
|
39.7 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
39.9 |
|
|
|
reclassification of opening translation reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004 under IFRS |
|
|
112.5 |
|
|
|
88.3 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
278.1 |
|
|
|
484.9 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
488.8 |
|
|
|
Explanation of transition to IFRS
The following sets out significant accounting policy changes and adjustments arising from the transition to IFRS from UK GAAP.
(a) Business combinations, goodwill and customer lists and relationships
IFRS 3 Business Combinations requires that goodwill arising from business combinations should not be amortized and will be tested annually for impairment. In addition certain intangible assets which were previously recognized as part of goodwill under UK GAAP are now required to be recognized separately and amortized over their estimated useful lives.
As permitted by IFRS 1 the Group has chosen to apply IFRS 3 from January 1, 2004 and has elected not to restate previous business combinations. The acquisition accounting for acquisitions made during 2004 has been restated in accordance with IFRS 3 and IAS 38 Intangible Assets, which has resulted in the recognition of certain intangible assets relating to customer lists and relationships. As such, £230.8m has been transferred from goodwill to intangible assets in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2004.
These intangible assets are being amortized over their estimated useful lives. As a result, amortization relating to goodwill on the balance sheet at the date of transition (net of the amortization charged on intangible assets) has been reversed, resulting in a credit to income of £16.6m for the year ended December 31, 2004.
F-42
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Explanation of transition to IFRS (Continued)
Under UK GAAP the Group was permitted to make adjustments to the fair values of assets acquired in business combinations for a period up to the end of the financial year following the date of acquisition (the investigative period). Under IFRS the investigative period covers one calendar year from the date of acquisition. During the year ended December 31, 2004 adjustments were made to the fair values of assets and liabilities acquired in business combinations since the date of transition, the timing of which were within the investigative period for UK GAAP but fell outside the investigative period under IFRS. As a result, £2.2m of fair value adjustments which were recognized in goodwill under UK GAAP were charged to the consolidated income statement under IFRS for the year ended December 31, 2004.
Due to the Group having previously adopted FRS 17 Retirement Benefits under UK GAAP, there are no significant differences arising upon transition to IAS 19 Employee Benefits. A credit adjustment of £0.7m has been made to the pension liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2004 to take account of the different valuation methodologies for pension scheme assets under IAS 19. The full actuarial deficit has been recognized rather than the corridor approach that can be adopted under IAS 19.
The disclosure requirements of IAS 19 require pension assets or liabilities recognized on the balance sheet to be stated gross of deferred tax, rather than being stated net of deferred tax as required by FRS 17. Accordingly £21.5m of deferred tax relating to pension liabilities has been reclassified as deferred tax assets within the IFRS consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2004.
(c) Deferred and current taxes
The scope of IAS 12 Income Taxes is wider than the corresponding UK GAAP standards and requires deferred tax to be provided on all temporary differences rather than just certain taxable timing differences under UK GAAP.
As a result a deferred tax liability of £1.3m relating to previously revalued fixed assets has been included in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2004. In addition, a deferred tax asset of £1.9m resulting from the recognition of an expense for share based payments has been included in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2004.
IAS 12 also requires a deferred tax liability to be recognized in the consolidated balance sheet upon recognition of intangible assets other than goodwill as part of a business combination. This deferred tax liability is unwound through the consolidated income statement in line with the amortization profile of the intangible assets acquired. Accordingly £75.5m has been recognized on the consolidated balance sheet as deferred tax at December 31, 2004 with £2.8m of the deferred tax being credited to the consolidated income statement for the year ended December 31, 2004.
IFRS 2 Share Based Payments requires that an expense for all equity instruments granted is recognized based on the fair value at the date of grant. This expense, which is in relation to option and performance share schemes, is recognized over the vesting period of the relevant scheme. The Group has adopted a valuation model for the purposes of computing fair value under IFRS as at the date of grant.
F-43
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Explanation of transition to IFRS (Continued)
The additional pre-tax expense arising from the adoption of IFRS 2 on the Groups consolidated income statement is £3.9m for the year ended December 31, 2004.
IAS 10 Events after the Balance Sheet Date requires that dividends declared after the balance sheet date should not be recognized as a liability at that balance sheet date as the liability does not represent a present obligation as defined by IAS 37 Provisions, Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets.
The final dividend in respect of the year ended December 31, 2003 of £37.0m has been reversed in the IFRS opening balance sheet at January 1, 2004 and charged in the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders equity for the year ended December 31, 2004.
The final dividend for the year ended December 31, 2004 of £39.9m has been reversed in the IFRS balance sheet at December 31, 2004 and has been charged in the consolidated statement of changes in shareholders equity for the year ended December 31, 2005.
(f) Previously revalued properties
Upon transition to IFRS, the Group elected to treat the UK GAAP value of all previously revalued properties as deemed cost. During the year ended December 31, 2004 one previously revalued property was deemed impaired, with the impairment loss of £1.3m being charged against the revaluation reserve under UK GAAP. Under IFRS, as the revaluation reserve was transferred to retained earnings upon transition as permitted by IFRS 1, the impairment loss has been taken to the consolidated income statement.
IAS 32 Financial Instruments: Disclosure and Presentation and IAS 39 Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement address the accounting for, and reporting of, financial instruments. IAS 39 sets out detailed accounting requirements in relation to financial assets and liabilities. As outlined in Note 1, this was applied for the first time for the year ended December 31, 2005.
All derivative financial instruments are accounted for at fair value whilst other financial instruments are accounted for either at amortized cost or at fair value depending on their classification. Subject to stringent criteria, derivative financial instruments, financial assets and financial liabilities may be designated as forming hedge relationships as a result of which fair value changes are offset in the income statement or charged/credited to equity depending on the nature of the hedge relationship.
From January 1, 2005 hedge accounting has been adopted for the Groups forward currency contracts which are taken out to hedge the cost of foreign currency debtors and creditors, thereby reducing potential volatility in the income statement. Hedge accounting has also been adopted for the Groups interest rate swaps and underlying capital market debt, thereby reducing potential volatility in the income statement.
Under UK GAAP the deferred tax position of the Group is shown net on the consolidated balance sheet. Under IFRS the assets and liabilities are required to be shown separately (net of any allowable offsets) and, as such, £8.6m has been reclassified as deferred tax assets and liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2004.
F-44
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
Explanation of transition to IFRS (Continued)
Under UK GAAP provisions are not disclosed according to their expected usage date. IFRS requires that provisions should be classified into current liabilities and non-current liabilities. As a result, £7.1m of provisions has been reclassified as current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2004.
The Consolidated Financial Statements do not constitute statutory accounts within the meaning of the Companies Act 1985 of Great Britain for any of the periods presented. Statutory accounts for the year ended December 31, 2004 have been filed with the Registrar of Companies for England and Wales. The statutory accounts for the year ended December 31, 2005 will be delivered to the Registrar of Companies following the Companys Annual General Meeting. The auditors have reported on these accounts. The reports were unqualified and did not contain statements under Section 237(2) or (3) of the Act.
These Consolidated Financial Statements exclude certain parent company statements and other information required by the Companies Act 1985. However they include all material disclosures required by IFRS including those Companies Act 1985 disclosures relating to the statements of income and balance sheet items.
31. Summary of significant differences between IFRS and US GAAP
The Groups Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with IFRS as adopted for use in the EU which differ in certain significant respects from US GAAP. Set out below is a summary of the significant differences, a reconciliation of profit from IFRS to US GAAP, a statement of comprehensive income, details of earnings per share in accordance with US GAAP, a reconciliation of equity shareholders funds from IFRS to US GAAP and a consolidated summary cash flow statement on a US GAAP basis.
(a) Goodwill and other intangible assets
The Group has exercised the exemption available under IFRS 1 First-time Adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards not to restate business combinations prior to the date of transition to IFRS (January 1, 2004). Therefore on transition to IFRS the amount of unamortized goodwill brought forward under UK GAAP at December 31, 2003 was taken as deemed cost at January 1, 2004. Goodwill arising on acquisitions before January 1, 1998 remains eliminated against reserves. Between January 1, 1998 to December 31, 2003, goodwill arising on acquisitions was capitalized and amortized over its useful life. Under IFRS goodwill arising on acquisitions after January 1, 2004 is capitalized in accordance with IFRS 3 Business Combinations. Goodwill is not amortized but is subject to annual impairment tests. Other intangible assets acquired in a business combination are recognized on acquisition and recorded at fair value. These assets are amortized through the income statement over their estimated useful economic lives.
Under US GAAP, goodwill arising on acquisitions is capitalized in accordance with SFAS 141 Business Combinations. Goodwill is not amortized but is subject to annual impairment tests. Goodwill arising on acquisitions before June 30, 2001 was amortized over the useful economic life of the asset until December 31, 2001. In accordance with SFAS 141 and SFAS 142 Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, other identifiable intangible assets are capitalized and amortized over their useful economic lives.
F-45
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
31. Summary of significant differences between IFRS and US GAAP (Continued)
In the period from July 1, 2001 to December 31, 2003 separately identifiable intangible assets acquired in business combinations are recognized for US GAAP purposes but not for IFRS following the transition exemption described in Note 29(a) above. Such intangible assets were not recognized under UK GAAP. Accordingly an additional charge for amortization of such intangible assets which are recognized for US GAAP purposes is included in the US GAAP reconciliation. Adjustments are also required to recognize the goodwill eliminated against reserves on acquisitions prior to January 1, 1998 and to reverse the amortization charge for goodwill between July 1, 2001 and December 31, 2003 which was amortized under UK GAAP but was not amortized under US GAAP. No adjustment is required in relation to acquisitions occurring after January 1, 2004.
Under IFRS pension schemes are accounted for in accordance with IAS 19 Employee Benefits. Under US GAAP they are accounted for under SFAS 87 Employers Accounting for Pensions and SFAS 88 Employers Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits.
Under IFRS, actuarial gains and losses are recognized in full in the year in which they arise in the consolidated statement of recognized income and expense. Under US GAAP actuarial gains and losses which exceed 10% of the value of the assets or liabilities at the start of the accounting period are amortized through the income statement over the remaining lives of the scheme members. Under IFRS the charge to the income statement is based on the fair market value of the assets. US GAAP uses a smoothed market-related value of the assets that recognizes changes to the fair value over a period of five years. US GAAP also requires the recognition of an additional minimum liability through a charge to other comprehensive income when the plan is in deficit based on its accumulated benefit obligation.
(c) Share based payments
Under IFRS the total expected expense based on the fair value at grant date of options and other share based incentives using a valuation model is calculated at the date of grant and spread over the expected vesting period. Under US GAAP the same approach is applied except that those share options that have performance conditions linked to the Retail Price Index are remeasured at fair value at each period end and are classified as liabilities.
(d) Derivative instruments
The Group has US dollar denominated borrowings which it has designated as a hedge of the net investment in its subsidiaries in the US. Under both US GAAP and IFRS, the foreign exchange gains and losses on these borrowings are taken to reserves. The Group also has foreign currency forward contracts which it uses to hedge net investments in foreign subsidiaries, primarily relating to the euro. Under IFRS the Group applies hedge accounting for these contracts which are recorded at fair value with gains and losses on the effective portion being taken to reserves whilst the ineffective portion, if any, is recorded in the income statement. Under US GAAP the Group does not apply net investment hedge accounting for these contracts and all gains and losses are therefore recorded in the income statement.
F-46
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
31. Summary of significant differences between IFRS and US GAAP (Continued)
(e) Deferred taxation
Under IFRS, full provision for deferred taxation is made although there are a number of different bases under US GAAP on which this calculation is made.
(f) Cash flows
The presentation of the cash flow statement under IFRS and US GAAP is broadly the same with individual cash flows being classified as either operating, financing or investing. US GAAP is however more prescriptive in the required classification of certain items whereas IFRS gives a choice of classification for certain items. The effect of the demerger of Filtrona is classified as a financing activity under US GAAP. Under IFRS interest received is classified as an investing activity and interest paid is classified as a financing activity. Under US GAAP interest received and paid are classified as operating activities.
Under IFRS cash and cash equivalents comprise cash balances, overdrafts and fixed term investments with maturities of three months or less from the date of acquisition. US GAAP excludes overdrafts from the definition of cash and cash equivalents and classifies overdrafts as a financing activity.
(g) Statement of comprehensive income
Under IFRS the statement of recognized income and expense is similar to the statement of comprehensive income under US GAAP.
|
|
|
|
for the year ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
Note |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||||
Profit |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||||
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
120.0 |
|
|
|
105.7 |
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
34.5 |
|
|
Profit for the financial year in accordance with IFRS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
123.6 |
|
|
|
140.2 |
|
|
US GAAP adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
(a) |
|
|
|
(4.8 |
) |
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
|
Pension costs |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
(0.9 |
) |
|
Share based payments |
|
|
(c) |
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
Derivative instruments |
|
|
(d) |
|
|
|
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(6.9 |
) |
|
Taxation on above adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
Net income before cumulative effect of change in accounting policy on adoption of SFAS 123R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
117.8 |
|
|
|
134.2 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting policy net of tax on adoption of SFAS 123R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
Net income for the financial year in accordance with US GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
117.8 |
|
|
|
131.7 |
|
|
Continuing operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
112.1 |
|
|
|
101.2 |
|
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
33.0 |
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting policy net of tax on adoption of SFAS 123R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
Net income for the financial year in accordance with US GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
117.8 |
|
|
|
131.7 |
|
|
F-47
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
31. Summary of significant differences between IFRS and US GAAP (Continued)
Statement of comprehensive income
|
|
for the year ended |
|
||||||||
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||||
Net income for the financial year in accordance with US GAAP |
|
|
117.8 |
|
|
|
131.7 |
|
|
||
Other comprehensive income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Additional minimum pension liability net of income tax(1) |
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
(5.4 |
) |
|
||
Currency translation net of income tax(2) |
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
(2.2 |
) |
|
||
Movement in cash flow hedge reserve net of income tax(3) |
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Comprehensive income in accordance with US GAAP |
|
|
147.0 |
|
|
|
124.1 |
|
|
||
(1) Income tax charge on additional minimum pension liability for 2005 was £7.1m (2004: credit of £2.7m).
(2) Income tax charge on currency translation for 2005 was £3.0m (2004: £1.9m).
(3) Income tax charge on the movement in cash flow hedge reserve for 2005 was £0.1m.
Earnings per share in accordance with US GAAP
|
|
for the year ended |
|
||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004* |
|
||||
Continuing operations |
|
|
33.1 |
p |
|
|
29.4 |
p |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
1.7 |
p |
|
|
9.5 |
p |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting policy net of tax on adoption of SFAS 123R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7) |
p |
|
Earnings per share in accordance with US GAAP |
|
|
34.8 |
p |
|
|
38.2 |
p |
|
Diluted earnings per share in accordance with US GAAP
|
|
for the year ended |
|
||||||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004* |
|
||||
Continuing operations |
|
|
32.9 |
p |
|
|
29.0 |
p |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
1.7 |
p |
|
|
9.4 |
p |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting policy net of tax on adoption of SFAS 123R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7) |
p |
|
Diluted earnings per share in accordance with US GAAP |
|
|
34.6 |
p |
|
|
37.7 |
p |
|
* The weighted average number of shares used in calculating the above earnings per share for 2004 has been adjusted for the share consolidation on June 6, 2005, as approved by shareholders at an Extraordinary General Meeting on June 2, 2005, when the ordinary shares of 25p each were consolidated on a seven for nine basis into ordinary shares of 321/7 p each.
F-48
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
31. Summary of significant differences between IFRS and US GAAP (Continued)
|
|
|
|
at December 31 |
|
||||
|
|
Note |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||
Equity shareholders funds in accordance with IFRS |
|
|
|
|
|
460.4 |
|
484.9 |
|
US GAAP adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
(a) |
|
|
129.5 |
|
218.4 |
|
Pensions |
|
|
(b) |
|
|
18.2 |
|
20.8 |
|
Share based payments |
|
|
(c) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
(7.9 |
) |
Deferred taxation |
|
|
(e) |
|
|
1.8 |
|
1.8 |
|
Taxation on above adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
(2.9 |
) |
(1.3 |
) |
Equity shareholders funds in accordance with US GAAP |
|
|
|
|
|
603.4 |
|
716.7 |
|
Consolidated cash flow statement
|
|
for the year ended |
|
||
|
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
Net cash inflow from operating activities |
|
132.0 |
|
151.4 |
|
Net cash outflow from investing activities |
|
(146.6 |
) |
(290.3 |
) |
Net cash (outflow)/inflow from financing activities |
|
(41.2 |
) |
88.4 |
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents per US GAAP |
|
(55.8 |
) |
(50.5 |
) |
Exchange movements |
|
1.8 |
|
(0.6 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year per US GAAP |
|
107.7 |
|
158.8 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year per US GAAP |
|
53.7 |
|
107.7 |
|
Supplementary information with respect to valuation and qualifying accounts
|
|
Balance at |
|
Charged to |
|
Utilised |
|
Other |
|
Balance at end of |
|
||||||||||
|
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
£m |
|
||||||||||
For the year ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for doubtful trade receivables |
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
(3.2 |
) |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
Inventory reserve |
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
(7.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for doubtful trade receivables |
|
|
9.4 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
(2.6 |
) |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
|
|
Inventory reserve |
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
(1.3 |
) |
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
25.9 |
|
|
* Other movements primarily relate to acquisitions and divestments.
F-49
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
31. Summary of significant differences between IFRS and US GAAP (Continued)
Recent Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) pronouncements
In March 2005 the FASB published FASB Staff Position (FSP) FIN 47, Accounting for Conditional Asset Retirement Obligationsan interpretation of FASB Statement No. 143 which clarifies the application of SFAS 143 Accounting for Obligations Associated with the Retirement of Long-Lived Assets in respect of conditional asset retirement obligations. The FSP is effective in the first reporting period ended after December 15, 2005. The FSP has not had a material impact on the Groups consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows under US GAAP.
In June 2005 the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached consensus on Issue 05-6, Determining the Amortisation Period for Leasehold Improvements Purchased after Lease Inception or Acquired in a Business Combination. EITF 05-6 requires leasehold improvements acquired in a business combination to be amortized over the shorter of the useful lives of the assets or a term that includes required lease periods and renewals deemed to be reasonably assured at the date of acquisition. Additionally, the Issue requires improvements placed in service significantly after and not contemplated at or near the beginning of the lease term to be amortized over the shorter of the useful lives of the assets or a term that includes required lease periods and renewals deemed to be reasonably assured at the date the leasehold improvements are purchased. EITF 05-6 is effective immediately. The adoption of EITF 05-6 has not had a material impact on the Groups consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows under US GAAP.
In March 2005 the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FIN 46(R)-5, Implicit Variable Interests under FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities. The FSP requires a reporting enterprise to consider whether it holds an implicit variable interest in the VIE or potential VIE. The determination of whether an implicit variable interest exists involves determining whether an enterprise may be indirectly absorbing or receiving the variability of the entity. The FSP is effective in the first reporting period beginning after March 3, 2005. The Group has not identified any material variable interest entities or interests in variable interest entities under FIN 46R and hence the issue of the FSP is not expected to have an impact on the Groups consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows under US GAAP.
In December 2004 the FASB issued SFAS 153, Exchanges of Non-monetary Assets - an amendment of APB Opinion 29, which amends APB Opinion 29, Accounting for Non-monetary Transactions to eliminate the exception for non-monetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of non-monetary assets that do not have commercial substance. SFAS 153 is effective for non-monetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. In November 2005 the FASB issued FSP 115-1 and FSP 124-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its Application to Certain Investments which nullify certain requirements of EITF 03-1 and supersede EITF D-44. The FSPs provide guidance for identifying impaired investments and new disclosure requirements for investments that are deemed to be temporarily impaired. The FSPs are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The adoption of the above pronouncements is not expected to have a material impact on the Groups consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows under US GAAP.
F-50
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Continued)
31. Summary of significant differences between IFRS and US GAAP (Continued)
In May 2005 SFAS 154, Accounting Changes and Error Correctionsreplacement of APB Opinion 20 and SFAS 3, was issued. SFAS 154 changes the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle by requiring retrospective application to prior periods financial statements of changes in accounting principle unless impracticable. SFAS 154 is effective for accounting changes made in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2005. The Group cannot determine the impact of SFAS 154 as it depends in part upon future changes to US accounting principles.
F-51
Directors
Remuneration Report
for the year ended 31 December 2005
Terms of reference of the Remuneration Committee
The terms of reference of the Remuneration Committee (the Committee), as approved by the Board, embody the purpose of the Committee as ensuring that the Companys executive directors and senior executives are properly incentivised and fairly rewarded for their individual contributions to the Groups overall performance having due regard to the interests of the shareholders and to the financial and commercial health of the Group.
All members of the Committee, who are identified on pages 17 and 18 of the Annual Review and Summary Financial Statement, are independent non-executive directors. The Committee is chaired by Mr C A Banks. Members of the Committee do not have any personal financial interest (other than as shareholders) in matters decided by the Committee, nor do they have any potential conflict of interest arising from cross-directorships or day-to-day involvement in running the Groups business. The Committee meets at least three times during the year and at other times as may be required. While neither the Chairman of the Company, Mr A J Habgood, nor the Chief Executive, Mr M J Roney, are members of the Committee, they normally attend meetings except when the Committee is considering matters concerning themselves. The Director of Group Human Resources acts as Secretary to the Committee.
The directors remuneration in 2005 and the details of the directors interests in the Companys ordinary shares disclosed on pages A-3 to A-13 have been audited by the Companys independent external auditor.
The Companys current remuneration policy for 2005 and beyond is designed to help ensure the recruitment, retention and motivation of the executive directors by providing fair reward for the responsibilities they undertake and the performance they achieve on behalf of shareholders. In this context, the Committees policy is to set the overall remuneration package at a competitive level and in a form that permits significant additional remuneration to be earned for high performance over a sustained period. This is normally achieved by benchmarking base pay against comparator companies taking into account a range of factors including performance, and by providing, in addition, short and long term incentives geared to performance.
In assessing the balance of performance related and non-performance related elements of remuneration, base pay and benefits are treated as non-performance related, whereas annual bonus (including awards under the Deferred Annual Share Bonus Scheme) (the DASBS) and long term incentives are treated as performance related. For this purpose, share options and performance shares are valued at an appropriate proportion of their face value on grant or award. On this basis, the Committee sets the remuneration package such that about half the total target remuneration package is derived from the performance related elements.
Both the overall competitiveness of the remuneration package and the balance between performance and non-performance related elements are kept under regular review in the light of market practice and the needs of the Company. The Committee commissions reports and receives advice on directors remuneration from independent remuneration and benefits consultants, namely Monks Partnership and
A-1
New Bridge Street Consultants, who may from time to time also provide other services to the Company on remuneration and benefit matters that are not the subject of review by the Committee. Further details of the remuneration policy and how it is currently applied to the various aspects of remuneration is provided in the relevant sections below.
With regard to external pay survey data, the Committee reviews each year, prior to the annual review of base pay in January, information on remuneration and benefit levels based on an external survey conducted on its behalf by Monks Partnership. The Committee seeks to maintain, wherever possible, a consistent and appropriate basis for comparison year-on-year in terms of the survey methodology and, in particular, the use of comparator groups on which the survey is based. There are three comparator groups that the Committee uses. These are related to revenue, profit before tax and market capitalisation. In each case the comparator group consists of 20 non-financial UK based companies that have substantial operations overseas. 10 of the companies in each comparator group are the next highest and 10 are the next lowest compared to Bunzl. The results from each of the comparator groups are blended by Monks Partnership to provide an overall assessed market position as at 1 January of the year of the review. Neither Monks Partnership nor New Bridge Street Consultants provide specific recommendations to the Committee on remuneration or benefit levels for the executive directors. The Committee does, however, review survey information provided by them in the light of its established remuneration policy before making its decisions. All decisions of the Committee were implemented in full.
The base pay of each executive director is set to reflect the size and scope of that directors responsibilities undertaken on behalf of the Board, the level of overall performance achieved and experience in the post. As stated above, it is benchmarked against comparator companies and the actual pay level is set after taking account of performance, relevant external survey data and the general movement of base pay within the Group.
The executive directors participate in an annual bonus plan intended to support the Companys overall remuneration policy. The bonus plan for each executive director contains meaningful targets that seek to focus attention on one or two key measures of short to medium term achievement. Bonus awards are not pensionable. In 2005, the target for the annual bonus for Mr A J Habgood, Mr M J Roney and Mr D M Williams (who retired from the Board on 31 January 2006) was linked to the Groups achievement of earnings per share after certain specified adjustments (eps). Detailed terms of the plan were determined by the Committee and provided for a bonus to be awarded if the Group achieved, in 2005, a threshold eps level. No bonus was to be awarded for eps achievement below the threshold level. The bonus plan provided for an increase in the bonus award pro rata for eps achievement above the threshold up to a target level of eps and for above target achievement. Half of this annual bonus will be paid in cash to a maximum level of 60% of annual base pay and the balance (but with the total aggregate amount capped at 100% of base pay) is deferred under the rules of the DASBS, details of which are set out below.
For Mr C P Sander (who resigned from the Board on 13 July 2005) and Mr P L Larmon their bonus plans for 2005 were based on the profit and return on average capital employed achieved in the businesses for which they were directly responsible. Mr P L Larmon also has a portion of his bonus based on Group performance. Half of Mr P L Larmons annual bonus is normally paid in cash to a maximum level of 60% of annual base pay and the balance (but with the total aggregate amount capped at 100% of base pay) is deferred under the rules of the DASBS. Mr C P Sander did not qualify for an award under the DASBS in respect of the 2005 financial year.
A-2
Under the DASBS, eligible executives, including the executive directors, receive the deferred element of their annual bonus as an award of ordinary shares. The ordinary shares are purchased in the market and deposited with the Bunzl Group General Employee Benefit Trust (the Trust) until 1 March in the third year after the year in which the award is made, following which they are transferred to the executive provided normally that the executive has remained in the employment of the Group throughout that period or until their normal retirement date. The DASBS forms a part of the annual bonus plan so as to provide, in total, an annual bonus opportunity linked to the overall performance of the Group, with a significant portion of any bonus award held in shares for a three year period. The Committee believes this supports the overall remuneration policy and contributes to the alignment of executives and shareholders interests.
The table below shows the number of shares held by the executive directors under the DASBS.
|
|
Shares held at |
|
Shares awarded |
|
Shares |
|
Shares held at |
|
||||||||
A J Habgood |
|
|
162,758 |
|
|
|
73,668 |
|
|
|
(45,061 |
) |
|
|
191,365 |
|
|
D M Williams |
|
|
87,792 |
|
|
|
38,843 |
|
|
|
(24,578 |
) |
|
|
102,057 |
|
|
P L Larmon |
|
|
21,563 |
|
|
|
16,641 |
|
|
|
(10,618 |
) |
|
|
27,586 |
|
|
C P Sander |
|
|
74,471 |
|
|
|
23,882 |
|
|
|
(17,616 |
) |
|
|
80,737 |
|
|
M J Harper |
|
|
45,232 |
|
|
|
19,427 |
|
|
|
(10,538 |
) |
|
|
54,121 |
|
|
a) All awards of shares are made in respect of bonus performance in the previous year.
b) The market values of the shares at the date of transfer in 2005 were as follows: Mr A J Habgood £230,555; Mr D M Williams £125,754; Mr P L Larmon £54,327, Mr C P Sander £90,133 and Mr M J Harper £53,918.
c) All awards held by Mr C P Sander on the date he ceased to be a director lapsed on 10 January 2006. All shares held by Mr M J Harper on the date he ceased to be a director were transferred to him on 7 June 2005 following the demerger of Filtrona at a market value of £289,283.
The Committee also reviews and authorises the outline structure of annual bonus plans for other senior executives within the Group. These plans are based on performance targets relevant to individual businesses or areas of responsibility and are compatible with the principles of the bonus plans approved for the executive directors.
The Committee believes that the long term performance of the Group is an important consideration for shareholders and that share based incentives are an important part of helping to align the interests of shareholders and those employed by the Group. A formal share ownership guideline is in place under which executive directors are expected to retain a shareholding worth at least equal to their basic salaries. A period of three years is allowed for executives who are promoted from within the Company to achieve this shareholding with an additional two years permitted in the case of external appointments.
The Long Term Incentive Plan (the LTIP) was approved by shareholders at the Companys Annual General Meeting in May 2004 under which the executive directors and other senior executives in the Group may be granted share options and awards in respect of performance shares. Participation in the LTIP is at the discretion of the Committee. The Committee periodically reviews the level of grant, taking account of each executives performance and job responsibilities. No further options will be granted under the 1994 Executive Share Option Scheme (the 1994 Scheme) which is now closed with the exception of
A-3
any outstanding options. Options were granted and performance shares awarded under the LTIP to the executive directors in 2005 in respect of market purchased shares some of which are held through the Trust. The LTIP is divided into two parts. Part A allows the Board to grant share options. Annual grants may not exceed an amount equal to three times base salary. In normal circumstances options granted are exercisable, subject to satisfaction of the relevant performance conditions as referred to below, not earlier than three years and not later than 10 years after the date of grant. Share options granted to date have a performance condition attached based on the Companys eps growth (adjusted to exclude items which do not reflect the Companys underlying financial performance and intangible amortisation) relative to UK inflation over three years. The performance conditions for options granted operate on the following sliding scale:
Face value of annual share options grant as a proportion of salary |
|
|
|
Total margin over UK |
|
||
First 150% of salary |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
||
Next 75% of salary |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
||
Next 75% of salary |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
The performance condition is tested after three years, with no provision for retesting. Accordingly, to the extent the performance condition has not been met after three financial years, the relevant share options will lapse. The Committee can set different performance conditions from those described above for future options, provided that the new conditions are no less challenging. Similarly the Committee can adjust the performance conditions of existing options to take account of technical changes, for example changes in accounting standards or in the event of a rights issue. The amended condition will be no less challenging as a result of the change.
A-4
The table below shows the number of share options held by executive directors under the executive share options schemes.
|
|
Exercise price (p) |
|
Options exercisable between |
|
Options at |
|
Options at |
|
||||||||
A J Habgood |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
09.03.02 08.03.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
406,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
01.03.03 28.02.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
30.08.03 29.08.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
455.5 |
|
|
|
27.02.04 26.02.11 |
|
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
|
135,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
29.08.04 28.08.11 |
|
|
|
145,000 |
|
|
|
145,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
28.02.05 27.02.12 |
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
|
|
155,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
29.08.05 28.08.12 |
|
|
|
190,000 |
|
|
|
190,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
372.25 |
|
|
|
25.02.06 24.02.13 |
|
|
|
305,000 |
|
|
|
305,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
446.25 |
|
|
|
27.08.06 26.08.13 |
|
|
|
305,000 |
|
|
|
305,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
451.5 |
|
|
|
03.03.07 02.03.14 |
|
|
|
305,000 |
|
|
|
305,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
500.25 |
|
|
|
01.03.08 28.02.15 |
|
|
|
152,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
09.09.08 08.09.15 |
|
|
|
143,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
M J Roney |
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
01.11.08 30.10.15 |
|
|
|
180,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
D M Williams |
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
09.03.02 08.03.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
145,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
30.03.02 29.03.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
01.03.03 28.02.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
30.08.03 29.08.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
455.5 |
|
|
|
27.02.04 26.02.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
29.08.04 28.08.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
28.02.05 27.02.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
29.08.05 28.08.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
372.25 |
|
|
|
25.02.06 24.02.13 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
446.25 |
|
|
|
27.08.06 26.08.13 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
460.5 |
|
|
|
26.05.07 25.05.14 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
125,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
500.25 |
|
|
|
01.03.08 28.02.15 |
|
|
|
65,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
P L Larmon |
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
01.09.02 31.08.09 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
15,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
30.08.03 29.08.10 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
455.5 |
|
|
|
27.02.04 26.02.11 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
29.08.04 28.08.11 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
28.02.05 27.02.12 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
29.08.05 28.08.12 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
20,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
372.25 |
|
|
|
25.02.06 24.02.13 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
446.25 |
|
|
|
27.08.06 26.08.13 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
451.5 |
|
|
|
03.03.07 02.03.14 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
500.25 |
|
|
|
01.03.08 28.02.15 |
|
|
|
53,200 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
09.09.08 08.09.15 |
|
|
|
48,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
C P Sander |
|
|
455.5 |
|
|
|
27.02.04 26.02.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
29.08.04 28.08.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
28.02.05 27.02.12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
29.08.05 28.08.12 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
372.25 |
|
|
|
25.02.06 24.02.13 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
446.25 |
|
|
|
27.08.06 26.08.13 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
451.5 |
|
|
|
03.03.07 02.03.14 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
500.25 |
|
|
|
01.03.08 28.02.15 |
|
|
|
54,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
M J Harper |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
01.03.03 28.02.10 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
30.08.03 29.08.10 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
455.5 |
|
|
|
27.02.04 26.02.11 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
29.08.04 28.08.11 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
28.02.05 27.02.12 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
29.08.05 28.08.12 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
372.25 |
|
|
|
25.02.06 24.02.13 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
446.25 |
|
|
|
27.08.06 26.08.13 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
451.5 |
|
|
|
03.03.07 02.03.14 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
A-5
a) The following executive share options were exercised during 2005 by:
(i) Mr A J Habgood on 7 September 2005 in respect of 406,504 ordinary shares at an exercise price of 246p and 150,000 ordinary shares at an exercise price of 289p (market price 572p) and on 10 November 2005 in respect of 125,000 ordinary shares at an exercise price of 384p (market price 594p);
(ii) Mr D M Williams on 12 September 2005 in respect of 145,782 ordinary shares at an exercise price of 246p, 29,275 ordinary shares at an exercise price of 245p and 80,000 ordinary shares at an exercise price of 289p (market price 575p) and on 15 November 2005 in respect of 65,000 ordinary shares at an exercise price of 384p, 65,000 ordinary shares at an exercise price of 455.5p, 70,000 ordinary shares at an exercise price of 450p, 75,000 ordinary shares at an exercise price of 482p and 90,000 ordinary shares at an exercise price of 461p (market price 593p);
(iii) Mr C P Sander on 29 June 2005 in respect of 25,000 ordinary shares at an exercise price of 455.5p, 25,000 ordinary shares at an exercise price of 450p and 25,000 ordinary shares at an exercise price of 482p (market price 509.5p) and on 12 December 2005 in respect of 40,000 ordinary shares at an exercise price of 461p (market price 600p); all remaining options lapsed when Mr C P Sander left the Company on 10 January 2006;
(iv) Mr M J Harper on 7 June 2005 following the demerger of Filtrona in respect of all of the ordinary shares listed above (market price 534.5p).
b) The exercise price of executive share options is the market price prevailing at or immediately prior to the date of grant of the option.
c) The mid-market price of an ordinary share on 31 December 2005 was 638p and the range during 2005 was 443p to 643p.
d) The performance condition for options granted under the 1994 Scheme is that they may not be exercised unless the growth in eps over a period of three consecutive financial years exceeds the growth in the UK retail price index over the same period by at least 6%.
e) All options granted prior to 25 May 2004 are under the 1994 Scheme. Options granted since then have been made under the LTIP.
The UK based executive directors may also participate in a Sharesave Scheme which was approved by shareholders in 2001, is approved by the Inland Revenue and is open to all UK employees who have completed at least one year of continuous service. It is linked to a contract for monthly savings of up to £250 per month over a period of either three or five years. Under the Sharesave Scheme options are granted to participating employees at a discount of up to 20% to the market price prevailing on the day immediately preceding the date of invitation to apply for the option. Options are normally exercisable either three or five years after they have been granted. The following table sets out the number of share options held under the Sharesave Scheme by the UK based executive directors.
|
|
Exercise price |
|
Options exercisable between |
|
Options at 31 December |
|
Options at |
|
||||||||
A J Habgood |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
01.05.06 01.11.06 |
|
|
|
3,192 |
|
|
|
3,192 |
|
|
D M Williams |
|
|
358 |
|
|
|
01.11.06 30.04.07 |
|
|
|
2,576 |
|
|
|
2,576 |
|
|
C P Sander |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
01.06.05 30.11.05 |
|
|
|
7,305 |
|
|
|
7,305 |
|
|
M J Harper |
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
01.05.08 31.10.08 |
|
|
|
5,548 |
|
|
|
5,548 |
|
|
A-6
a) Mr C P Sander exercised 7,305 options under the Sharesave Scheme (1991) on 13 July 2005 at an exercise price of 231p (market price 527p).
b) Mr M J Harper exercised 2,772 options under the Sharesave Scheme (2001) on 5 December 2005 at an exercise price of 296p (market price 606.5p). All of his remaining options lapsed on this date.
US based executive directors may participate in the Bunzl Employee Stock Purchase Plan (US). This Plan provides an opportunity for employees in the US to purchase the Companys shares in the form of American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) at a 15% discount to the market price, up to an annual maximum of 10% of remuneration or $25,000 worth of ADRs, whichever is lower. The purchase of the ADRs is funded by after-tax payroll deductions from the employee with the employing company contributing the 15% discount.
Based on the authority obtained at the 2001 Annual General Meeting, the Company introduced the International Sharesave Plan during 2002. This operates on a similar basis to the Sharesave Scheme (2001) except that options are normally exercisable three years after they have been granted. None of the executive directors are eligible to participate in this Plan.
Part B of the LTIP allows the Board to award performance shares which is a conditional right to receive shares in the Company for no or nominal consideration. Annual awards may not exceed an amount equal to two times base salary. A performance share award will normally vest (i.e. become exercisable) on the third anniversary of its grant to the extent that the applicable performance condition has been satisfied and will remain capable of being exercised for the three year period following the date on which it vests. The extent to which performance share awards vest will be subject to the Companys total shareholder return (TSR) performance over a three year period relative to the TSR performance of a specified group of companies (the Peer Group). The process for identifying the Peer Group is the same as that used for identifying the comparator group for the setting of base pay as described under Remuneration policy on pages A-1 and A-2. The companies currently within the Peer Group for any awards to be made in 2006 are:
ARM Holdings |
|
GKN |
|
Reuters |
BBA Group |
|
Hanson |
|
Rexam |
BG Group |
|
ICI |
|
Rolls-Royce Group |
British Airways |
|
IMI |
|
Ryanair |
Cairn Energy |
|
Inchcape |
|
Sage Group |
Cobham |
|
Johnson Matthey |
|
Signet Group |
Compass Group |
|
Kesa Electricals |
|
Smiths Group |
Cookson Group |
|
LogicaCMG |
|
Tate & Lyle |
Corus Group |
|
Lonmin |
|
Tomkins |
Dimensions Data Hldgs |
|
Meggitt |
|
United Business Media |
Electrocomponents |
|
Pearson |
|
Xstrata |
EMI Group |
|
Reed Elsevier |
|
|
FKI |
|
Rentokil Initial |
|
|
A-7
A performance share award will vest in full only if the Companys TSR performance is ranked at upper quartile or above within the Peer Group and the following vesting schedule will apply:
TSR |
|
|
|
Proportion of performance share award |
|
Below median |
|
0 |
|
||
Median |
|
25% |
|
||
Median to upper quartile |
|
25% 100% |
|
||
Upper quartile |
|
100% |
|
The performance condition will be tested after three years and there is no provision for retesting. Accordingly, to the extent the performance condition has not been met after three years, the relevant performance share awards will lapse. As with the share option grants, the Committee reviews the performance condition each time performance share awards are made in order to ensure that they remain challenging and may impose different conditions on performance share awards made in subsequent years provided that any new conditions are no less challenging.
The table below shows the number of performance share awards allocated to the executive directors under the LTIP and its predecessor plan which is now closed, all for no consideration.
|
|
Awards (shares) held at |
|
Conditional shares |
|
Awards (shares) |
|
Awards (shares) held |
|
||||||||
A J Habgood |
|
|
228,750 |
|
|
|
221,647 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
450,397 |
|
|
M J Roney |
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
120,353 |
|
|
D M Williams |
|
|
93,750 |
|
|
|
46,875 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,625 |
|
|
P L Larmon |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
76,208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
136,208 |
|
|
C P Sander |
|
|
160,000 |
|
|
|
40,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,800 |
|
|
M J Harper |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
a) In addition to the conditional shares awarded under the LTIP to Mr M J Roney in 2005 as listed above, a further 175,000 conditional shares were awarded on 1 November 2005 as an exceptional discretionary benefit to implement the terms agreed on the recruitment of Mr M J Roney as Chief Executive in order to compensate him for the loss of existing entitlements from his previous employer. This award will vest if Mr M J Roney remains employed by the Company until 31 October 2008, or earlier if the Company terminates Mr Roneys employment prior to this date for any reason other than gross misconduct or if his employment terminates due to death, disability, sickness or a change of control of the Company.
b) An award of 100,000 shares, which vested prior to his appointment as a director, was exercised by Mr C P Sander on 28 June 2005 giving a total market value on exercise of £506,600. The awards relating to the remaining 100,800 shares held by Mr C P Sander lapsed on 10 January 2006 when he left the Company.
c) Half of the award held by Mr M J Harper became exercisable in respect of 30,000 shares on 7 June 2005 giving a total market value on exercise of £160,353. The balance of the award in respect of the remaining 30,000 shares lapsed on 6 June 2005 following the demerger of Filtrona.
A-8
Any shares required to fulfill entitlements under the share based incentive schemes in respect of options and awards over market purchased shares will be provided by the Trust. Mr A J Habgood, Mr D M Williams, Mr M J Roney and Mr P L Larmon are deemed by virtue of the Companies Act 1985 to be interested in all the shares held by the Trust, which at 31 December 2005 amounted to 8,121,342 ordinary shares, because they are potential beneficiaries under the Trust together with all other directors and employees of the Group. These interests do not reflect the awards actually made to them individually through the Trust that are summarised above.
The Companys TSR over the last five years compared to that of the FTSE Support Services Sector is shown in the graph on page 23 of the Annual Review and Summary Financial Statement.
As stated in the Accounting Policies section of the financial statements and elaborated upon in Note 22, the Group utilises both defined benefit and defined contribution pension schemes throughout the world. All principal defined benefit schemes are now closed to new entrants who are offered a defined contribution arrangement.
In the UK the Group has historically operated as its main contributory scheme for senior executives the Bunzl Senior Pension Scheme (BSPS). BSPS provides for members contributions currently at the rate of 9% of pensionable salary (which is basic salary) with the Group being responsible for the balance of the cost of providing the benefit as determined from time to time by the consulting actuaries to BSPS. Subject to Inland Revenue limits, BSPS members are eligible for a pension which accrues at a maximum rate of 3% per annum up to two thirds of pensionable salary, with a normal retirement age of 60 years. BSPS also provides for payment of certain benefits in the event of death or disability. Because of the cap on pensionable salary introduced in the Finance Act 1989, the amount of direct contribution by the Company to pension schemes for some of the UK executive directors is limited and arrangements have therefore been made to provide the executive directors with an allowance of 30% of base salary above the cap which permits them to make provision, of their choice, in respect of that part of their salary which exceeds the cap. Alternatively the executive director may choose to opt for a pension allowance of 30% of base salary, part of which could be paid directly into a private pension scheme. Currently any UK executive director newly appointed to the Group is offered a pension allowance of 30% of base salary and has the choice of joining the defined contribution section of the Bunzl Pension Plan or to opt for a private pension scheme or other investment vehicle. The Company also contributes to lump sum life assurance cover equivalent to that provided under BSPS for those executive directors receiving allowances.
In the US the main scheme for employees is the non-contributory Bunzl USA, Inc Retirement Plan (the US Plan). Subject to IRS limits, members of the US Plan earn a lifetime pension which accrues at a rate of 1.67% per annum, up to 50% of the five year average pensionable salary less the primary social security benefit, with a normal retirement age of 65 years. Pensionable salary in the US Plan is capped at $140,000. The US Plan also provides for certain benefits in the event of death or disability. On closure of the US Plan to new entrants all existing participating employees had the choice to continue in the existing scheme or freeze their benefit and join a defined contribution plan, the Retirement Saving Benefit (the RSB). Contributions to the RSB are fully funded by the employer on a sliding scale that is age related. The contributions are a percentage of base salary (maximum 5%), which is capped at $200,000 per annum. Because of the cap on pensionable salary under the US Plan and the RSB, the pensions of senior US executives are limited and arrangements have been made to provide certain executives with supplementary pensions through a Senior Executive Retirement Agreement (SERA). Mr P L Larmons SERA provides for a lifetime pension of $100,000 per annum, payable upon retirement.
A-9
Executive directors service contracts
It is the Companys policy that executive directors are normally employed on contracts that provide for 12 months notice from the Company and six months notice from the executive. However on appointment, Mr M J Roney, due to his relocation and move from his previous company after 24 years service, was provided with 24 months notice which during the first 12 months of employment reduces on a quarterly basis by one month for each quarter. During the period of months 13 to 24 of employment, the notice period continues to reduce quarterly but by two months each quarter so that after 24 months service the Company will provide Mr M J Roney with 12 months notice. For the UK executive directors, the only circumstance in which there is predetermined compensation for termination of these contracts is where there is a change of control of the Company. Mr P L Larmons contract provides that on termination by the Company without cause he is entitled to receive payment of 12 months base salary plus health insurance coverage, reduced by any interim earnings. There are no provisions for any of the directors for predetermined compensation in excess of one years remuneration and benefits in kind. Mr M J Roney, for the first three years of service in limited circumstances only, is also entitled to receive a repatriation payment to cover relocation and school fees that have been incurred. The date of each service contract is noted in the table below.
|
|
Date of service contract |
|
||
A J Habgood |
|
|
16 January 1996 |
|
|
M J Roney |
|
|
1 September 2005 |
|
|
D M Williams |
|
|
16 January 1996 |
|
|
P L Larmon |
|
|
1 January 2005 |
|
|
Mr A J Habgoods service contract ended on 31 December 2005 and was replaced with a letter of appointment relating to his ongoing role as Chairman. Mr M J Harpers service contract ended on 6 June 2005 following the demerger of Filtrona. Mr C P Sander resigned as a director on 13 July 2005 and his service contract ended on 10 January 2006. Mr D M Williams retired as Finance Director on 31 December 2005 and retired from the Board and from the Company on 31 January 2006. Mr B M May was appointed as Finance Director with effect from 1 January 2006. His service contract is dated 9 December 2005.
With the specific approval of the Board in each case, executive directors may accept external appointments as non-executive directors of other companies and retain any related fees paid to them. Mr A J Habgood served as Chairman Designate of Whitbread Group PLC from 1 May 2005 and Chairman from 1 August 2005 and retained the fees paid for this service of £166,667. Further, Mr A J Habgood served as a non-executive director of SVG Capital plc throughout 2005 and retained the fees of £36,250. He also served as a non-executive director of Marks and Spencer Group plc until 30 August 2005 and retained the fees of £33,333. Mr D M Williams served as a non-executive director of George Wimpey Plc throughout 2005 and retained the fees of £49,583. In addition he served as a non-executive director of Peninsular & Oriental Steam Navigation Company from 1 March 2005 and retained the fees of £43,169.
Other principal benefits for executive directors
In common with many senior executives in the Group, the executive directors are eligible for certain benefits which include the provision of a company car and payment of its operating expenses including fuel, or a cash allowance in lieu thereof, in line with prevailing Group policies, and, in the case of Mr A J Habgood, Mr D M Williams and Mr M J Roney, private medical plan coverage under the Companys prevailing UK healthcare plan. Mr P L Larmon participates in welfare benefit plans made available to all US employees of the Group covering life insurance, medical, dental and disability cover. In addition Mr M J Roney has received a relocation package consisting of reimbursement of travel costs,
A-10
temporary accommodation, legal and professional fees for securing accommodation and tax advice and a disturbance allowance.
The non-executive directors are paid an annual fee for their services. In addition, where relevant, they are paid a fee for chairing the Audit and Remuneration Committees of the Board. The non-executive directors do not have service contracts, are not eligible for pension scheme membership or other employee benefits and do not participate in any of the Groups bonus, share option or long term incentive plans. The non-executive directors pay is reviewed annually, based on external market survey data, and is determined by the Board.
The following table gives details of each directors remuneration for the year.
|
|
Salary/fees |
|
Annual cash |
|
Pension |
|
Benefits 2005 |
|
Total 2005 |
|
Total 2004 |
|
||||||||||||
|
|
|
£000 |
|
|
|
£000 |
|
|
|
£000 |
|
|
|
£000 |
|
|
|
£000 |
|
|
|
£000 |
|
|
Executive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A J Habgood |
|
|
875.0 |
|
|
|
426.1 |
|
|
|
262.5 |
|
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
1,593.5 |
|
|
|
1,461.3 |
|
|
M J Roney |
|
|
152.2 |
|
|
|
55.2 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
|
|
|
76.7 |
|
|
|
318.1 |
|
|
|
38.1 |
|
|
D M Williams |
|
|
460.0 |
|
|
|
224.0 |
|
|
|
106.5 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
|
|
|
814.2 |
|
|
|
752.6 |
|
|
P L Larmon |
|
|
400.5 |
|
|
|
209.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
|
|
629.5 |
|
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
C P Sander |
|
|
410.8 |
|
|
|
60.0 |
|
|
|
60.6 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
543.8 |
|
|
|
247.8 |
|
|
M J Harper |
|
|
145.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
151.2 |
|
|
|
27.7 |
|
|
Non-executive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A P Dyer |
|
|
70.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70.9 |
|
|
|
86.7 |
|
|
J F Harris |
|
|
70.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70.0 |
|
|
|
62.7 |
|
|
C A Banks |
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54.8 |
|
|
|
48.0 |
|
|
U Wolters |
|
|
45.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45.5 |
|
|
|
22.8 |
|
|
P Heiden |
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
39.4 |
|
|
a) The remuneration for Mr A P Dyer and Mr P L Larmon is paid or determined in US dollars and has been translated at the average exchange rates for the year of £1: $1.81 in respect of 2005 and £1: $1.82 in respect of 2004.
b) The remuneration of Mr M J Roney relates to the period from 1 January 2005 until 31 October 2005, when he held the role of non-executive director and received fees of £38,917, and the period 1 November 2005 until 31 December 2005, when he held the role of Chief Executive Officer and received base salary of £113,333 as well as a bonus, pension allowance and benefits as detailed in the above table. The benefits received include £74,343 of relocation related expenses.
c) The remuneration of Mr C P Sander for 2005 relates to the period from 1 January 2005 until 10 January 2006 when his service contract terminated. His remuneration for 2004 relates to the period from 21 July 2004 (the date of his appointment to the Board) to 31 December 2004. For the period from 1 January 2005 until 13 July 2005 Mr C P Sander was an executive director and during this period received base salary of £212,308, a bonus of £60,000, a pension allowance of £31,075 and benefits of £6,323. Following Mr C P Sanders resignation from the Board he remained employed by the Company until 10 January 2006. For the period 14 July 2005 until 31 December 2005 he received
A-11
base salary of £187,692, a pension allowance of £27,927 and benefits of £5,682 and for the period 1 January 2006 until 10 January 2006 he received base salary of £10,769, a pension allowance of £1,585 and benefits of £398. Life cover (to the value of £721) continues until 31 March 2006 when all obligations cease. No termination payments were made.
d) The remuneration of Mr M J Harper and Mr P Heiden for 2005 relate to the period from 1 January 2005 until 6 June 2005, the date of their retirement from the Board following the demerger of Filtrona.
e) The remuneration of Mr M J Harper and Mr P L Larmon for 2004 relates to the period from 8 December 2004 (the date of their appointment to the Board) to 31 December 2004. The remuneration of Mr U Wolters for 2004 relates to the period from 1 July 2004 (the date of his appointment to the Board) to 31 December 2004.
f) Mr B M May was appointed to the Board on 1 January 2006 to replace Mr D M Williams who retired from the Board on 31 January 2006. His base salary is £375,000 per annum and his bonus and benefits are in line with those applied to other UK based executive directors.
g) Benefits incorporate all taxable benefits arising from employment by the Company and principally relate to the provision of a company car or cash allowance in lieu thereof.
h) The figures above represent remuneration earned as directors during the relevant financial year including, in the case of the executive directors, the cash element of the bonus, which is paid in the year following that in which it is earned. The deferred element of the bonus is conditionally allocated as shares as described on page 46 and is not included in the table above. Shares relating to the 2004 bonus were allocated in 2005 as shown in the table on page 48 and for the 2005 bonus will be allocated in 2006.
i) Neither Mr A J Habgood nor Mr M J Roney are members of the Company pension schemes and therefore they received a pension allowance of 30% of base salary as shown in the above table. Mr A J Habgoods entitlement to this allowance ceased on 31 December 2005. The values of the pension benefits for the other executive directors are shown in the following table and are not included in the directors remuneration table above. In addition the Company paid all necessary contributions, on actuarial advice, to a SERA for Mr P L Larmon which in 2005 amounted to £44,975 (2004: £3,309).
|
|
Accrued |
|
Accrued benefits at |
|
Transfer value |
|
Change in transfer |
|
Transfer value of |
|
||||||||
|
|
£ |
|
|
£ |
|
|
|
£ |
|
|
|
£ |
|
|
|
£ |
|
|
D M Williams |
|
40,545 |
|
|
45,144 |
|
|
|
783,971 |
|
|
|
176,363 |
|
|
|
969,787 |
|
|
P L Larmon* |
|
13,607 |
|
|
15,190 |
|
|
|
58,285 |
|
|
|
14,256 |
|
|
|
72,541 |
|
|
C P Sander |
|
26,730 |
|
|
30,133 |
|
|
|
266,928 |
|
|
|
73,362 |
|
|
|
349,713 |
|
|
M J Harper |
|
116,219 |
|
|
141,785 |
|
|
|
1,413,706 |
|
|
|
360,889 |
|
|
|
1,787,345 |
|
|
* Excluding SERA entitlements.
a) Of the additional benefits accrued since 1 January 2005, the increases attributable to factors other than inflation were £3,504 for Mr D M Williams, £nil for Mr P L Larmon, £2,682 for Mr C P Sander and £25,566 for Mr M J Harper.
A-12
b) The above figures do not take account of any Additional Voluntary Contributions that all members of BSPS have the option to make.
c) The transfer values of accrued benefits have been calculated on the basis of actuarial advice in accordance with any relevant actuarial legislation and, in the case of Mr D M Williams, Mr C P Sander and Mr M J Harper, are net of their contributions.
d) Mr P L Larmons benefits under the US Plan are frozen. Mr P L Larmon is now a member of the RSB to which the Company has made contributions in 2005 of £5,525 (2004: £nil).
e) In addition Mr P L Larmon participates in the Bunzl USA, Inc Deferred Savings (401k) Plan. The Company makes matching contributions to this Plan. During 2005 such contributions for Mr P L Larmon amounted to £5,097 (2004: £nil).
A-13
1.1 |
Memorandum and Articles of Association of the Company (filed herewith). |
2.1 |
Form of Deposit Agreement dated as of October 29, 1998 among the Company, The Bank of New York and the holders from time to time of the American Depositary Receipts issued thereunder. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A of the Companys Registration Statement on Form F-6 (File No. 333-9536) filed on October 20, 1998.) |
2.2 |
Form of American Depositary Receipt attached as Exhibit A to the Form of Deposit Agreement (filed herewith). |
4.1. |
Service Agreement as of January 1, 2005 between Bunzl USA, Inc. and P.L. Larmon. (Incorporated by reference to the Companys Form 20-F (File No. 001-14868) filed on May 27, 2005.) |
4.2 |
Service Agreement as of November 1, 2005 between the Company and M.J. Roney (filed herewith). |
4.3 |
Service Agreement as of January 1, 2006 between the Company and B.M. May (filed herewith). |
12.1 |
Certification of M.J. Roney filed pursuant to Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act) Rule 13a-14(a). |
12.2 |
Certification of B.M. May filed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a). |
13.1 |
Certification of M.J. Roney and B.M. May furnished pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(b). |
14.1 |
Consent of KPMG Audit Plc to the incorporation by reference of their report dated February 27, 2006, except as to Note 31, which is as of April 28, 2006 under Item 3 of Part II of the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-93615) filed on December 27, 1999. |