U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-KSB/A
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from_____________ to _______________
Commission File Number 333-75044
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC.
-----------------------------
(formerly WENTWORTH III, INC.)
------------------------------
(Name of small business issuer in its charter)
Delaware 84-1588927
------------------------------ ------------------------------------
(State or jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)
7700 Wyatt Drive
Forth Worth, TX 76108
-------------------------------
(Address and telephone number
of principal executive offices)
Issuer's telephone number: (800) 433-7753
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Common Stock, $.01 par value per share
--------------------------------------
(Title of class)
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes [X] No [ ].
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item
405 of Regulation S-B contained in this form and no disclosure will be
contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB
or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB. [ ]
The issuer's revenues for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 were
$16,358,303.
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the
common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common
equity, as of a specified date within the past 60 days. (See definition of
affiliate in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): $2,257,381.
As of October 31, 2004, there were 3,756,051 shares of our common stock,
par value $0.01 per share, outstanding, of which 851,842 were held by
non-affiliates.
Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one): Yes [ ] No [X]
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant's Proxy Statement for the Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held on or about February 28, 2005 (to be filed) are
incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-KSB.
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Certain statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB are
"forward-looking statements" (within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995) regarding the plans and objectives of management
for future operations. Such statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results, performance or
achievements of Catalyst Lighting Group, Inc., formerly Wentworth III, Inc. (the
"Company"), to be materially different from any future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The
forward-looking statements included herein are based on current expectations
that involve numerous risks and uncertainties. The Company's plans and
objectives are based, in part, on assumptions involving the continued expansion
of business. Assumptions relating to the foregoing involve judgments with
respect to, among other things, future economic, competitive and market
conditions and future business decisions, all of which are difficult or
impossible to predict accurately and many of which are beyond the control of the
Company. Although the Company believes its assumptions underlying the
forward-looking statements are reasonable, any of the assumptions could prove
inaccurate and, therefore, there can be no assurance the forward-looking
statements included in this Report will prove to be accurate. In light of the
significant uncertainties inherent in the forward-looking statements included
herein, the inclusion of such information should not be regarded as a
representation by the Company or any other person that the objectives and plans
of the Company will be achieved.
PART I
Item 1. Description of Business
We were formed as a "blank check" Delaware corporation in March 2001 to effect a
merger, exchange of capital stock, asset acquisition or other similar business
combination with an operating business which we believe has significant growth
potential. As of February 12, 2003, we entered into a Securities Exchange
Agreement with Whitco Company, L.L.P., a Texas limited liability partnership
which manufactures, markets and distributes outdoor lighting poles. On August
27, 2003, we acquired Whitco Company, LP (successor in interest as a result of
the conversion of Whitco Company, L.L.P. to a limited partnership) through an
exchange of all of Whitco's partnership units, and options to purchase
partnership units, for 2,991,368 shares of Catalyst common stock, and options to
purchase 808,632 shares of Catalyst common stock. Whitco became our wholly-owned
subsidiary.
Whitco is a nationwide manufacturer, marketer and distributor of steel and
aluminum outdoor lighting poles. Founded in 1969, Whitco sells poles directly to
original equipment manufacturers (OEM's) and indirectly to other third parties
through its own contracted sales representatives. We seek to have Whitco become
the preferred manufacturer, marketer and distributor of steel and aluminum
lighting pole structures and accessories, and we may attempt to acquire or
develop additional subsidiaries to pursue additional market opportunities. We
believe the necessary systems and people are in place to aggressively grow and
expand among the specialty markets within the lighting industry.
1
The Industry
According to the United States Department of Commerce and the National
Electrical Manufacturer's Association the overall U.S. outdoor lighting
industry, including fixtures, poles and accessories, represents a nearly $2
billion market. This market has grown by more than 75% over the last 10 years,
driven in part by the growth in commercial real estate development. We believe
this market, coupled with recent merger and acquisition activity within the
industry, bodes well for our expected "build-up" acquisition strategy discussed
below. As the demand for, and value of, businesses in this sector continues to
increase, we believe we are well positioned to pursue opportunistic
acquisitions, gain new customers, expand product offerings, increase market
share and become an attractive acquisition candidate ourselves.
The U.S. outdoor lighting pole market alone is estimated at $750 million,
including an estimated $250 million in Department of Transportation ("DOT") and
traffic control poles (a market in which we do not participate). The market is
comprised primarily of four material types: steel poles (60%), aluminum (18%),
concrete (12%) and composite (10%).
The outdoor lighting pole industry tends to be cyclical based on general
economic conditions and, more specifically, non-residential construction
spending and public and private highway/roadway construction and improvements.
The U.S. Department of Commerce reported declines in non-residential
construction spending of 18% and 5% in 2002 and 2003, respectively. These
declines have been partially offset by continued spending on highway
construction under the U.S. Highway Transportation bill, the growth in outdoor
sports venues and added concerns about safety and "light spill." We have
attempted to limit our exposure to these outside factors by offering diverse
products with many applications through a sales network that has nearly 100%
geographic coverage in the United States.
Whitco has and will continue to operate primarily in the commercial and
industrial lighting ("C&I") markets. However, we also seek opportunities in the
city and county and utility and municipality markets. The C&I market represents
the commercial sales area of the market, primarily commercial real estate
developments and industrial development areas not related to government. City
and county areas are those developments directed by local governments without
the involvement of federal highway funds. In some cases, our lighting agents
also place sales emphasis on local developments by cities and counties. Utility
and municipality segment represents those developments directed by local
utilities or municipal developments in which the local utility controls the
lighting aspects of the real estate development, without the involvement of
federal highway funds. In local areas, a utility may direct the installation of
lighting and provide a usage fee to the local government for that lighting area.
In some cases, Whitco lighting agents sell to utilities. Department of
Transportation sources represent those areas involving the deployment of both
local and federal highway funds with specifications directed by the local or
state governments, as well as the federal government. We rarely participate in
business with the Department of Transportation as it is a different sales
channel than Whitco has traditionally served. Whitco markets area and sports
lighting products through its catalog and via the Internet at
www.whitcopoles.com.
2
Products and Services
All of our poles are made to order and are sold either directly to OEM's from
our primary offices in Fort Worth, Texas or indirectly through sales
representatives, known in the lighting industry as lighting agencies.
Some OEM's only sell existing lines of lighting fixtures, while some manufacture
lighting poles and others source pole manufacturing on a private label basis
through companies such as ours. We sell poles which complement existing fixture
lines, provide engineering expertise and have specialty design features to allow
the poles to be easily integrated with the lighting fixture. The entire unit,
consisting of the pole and fixtures, is then shipped to the customer under the
OEM brand name. Although some OEM's manufacture their own poles, they often
require our poles because they do not have the capability to manufacture the
poles required for a specific order. When selling to an OEM, we arrange shipment
directly to the project location for final assembly and installation by third
parties. We have the capability to join an OEM on national account bids. In
2004, we sold to approximately 20 OEM customers.
We have contracts in place with approximately 75 lighting agencies, each in
separate, defined geographic territories covering nearly 100% of the United
States. Each lighting agency contract typically gives the lighting agency the
exclusive right to sell our poles in a given geographical location in exchange
for such agency agreeing to sell only poles we manufacture. The typical
exception allows lighting agencies to sell poles from their OEM fixture
providers and us to sell poles to OEMs to deliver into the lighting agency's
territory. Lighting agency contract terms vary by territory, although all our
contracts with lighting agencies may be terminated by us on 30 days' notice. No
individual lighting agency accounted for more than 10% of sales for the fiscal
years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. These agencies primarily sell fixtures
and our poles complement their product lines. We work diligently to find the
appropriate agency in a territory to sell our products, and further strive to
have that agency sell only poles we manufacture. A typical order will come from
an agency for shipment direct to a construction location, with billing directed
to the electrical distributor or contractor. Terms are predominantly net 30
days. We believe we gain and keep top lighting agents and OEMs through
competitive pricing, timeliness and the ability to effectively deliver needed
technical information on specified products.
During the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 one customer accounted for
more than 10% of our sales, totaling 11% and 14%, respectively. No other single
customer accounted for more than 10% of total revenues.
Design, Manufacturing and Distribution
In fiscal year 2004, we opened our first manufacturing facility and began
producing poles in-house. Historically, Whitco outsourced the manufacturing of
poles. We believe this transition, once complete, will increase our competitive
advantage in the market and allow us to lower cost and reduce lead times to our
customer base. As of the end of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, the
Company still outsourced a portion of its manufacturing process.
3
We design all of our own poles and complete specification and stress
calculations using an in-house engineering team. We assist our sales agents and
OEM's with specific project submittals to engineers. We then submit a work order
to our manufacturing facility or to an outsourced manufacturer based on the
product specified. We purchase raw steel tubes from both domestic and foreign
suppliers, primarily relying on Trans America Power Products to supply steel
tubes. We also place orders with several other suppliers. The raw steel tubes
are held in inventory either at our manufacturing facility or a designated
outsource manufacturer, also located in Fort Worth, Texas. Either the Company or
the outsource manufacturer completes all stages of pole fabrication. All
operational aspects of manufacturing, including inventory control, purchasing,
adherence to specifications and shipping are performed by us. We have limited
financial responsibility for raw aluminum product inventory as a significant
portion of our aluminum poles are made to order from one of two pole
manufacturers.
Once an order has been placed, production time until completed poles are ready
for shipment is approximately one week, while larger orders can take up to three
weeks. Once completed, the lighting poles are shipped directly to the customer
from our manufacturing facility or the outsourced manufacturer, as applicable.
Employees
We currently have 34 full-time employees, including our three executive
officers. Fifteen of these, all of whom work in our manufacturing facility, are
employees of an outsourced human resources firm.
We have sales representative agreements in place with approximately 75 sales
representatives across the continental United States. They are not employees,
but receive commissions based on sales. Our commission structure pays agents
100% of the overage above our base price, compared to an industry average of
75%.
Trademark and Copyright Protection
Whitco has applied for trademark protection for its logo, as well as the logo of
Catalyst Lighting Group, Inc. We have submitted initial applications for these
logos to the United States Patent and Trademark Office. We currently have an
application in review with the United States Patent and Trademark Office for an
elliptical crossarm. This design has the ability to reduce wind resistance by a
substantial amount compared to the traditional designs in the market place.
Business Strategy
Virtually all of our revenues are generated in the C&I market. We intend to
continue serving this niche while seeking to acquire or start new business
ventures within the lighting industry in an attempt to increase market share.
Our focus on the C&I market is the result of our historical expertise in this
market and the fact that most of our lighting agents and OEM customers are
focused in this area.
4
We place particular emphasis on the sports, high mast and area lighting sectors
within the commercial and industrial markets. The sports lighting area
represents those venues lit by outdoor lighting for night time play. This ranges
from professional sports venues to local parks and recreation areas. We have the
ability to complete pre-wiring for our sports lighting products prior to
shipment. High mast refers to those installations requiring large area lighting
needs of commercial areas. These represent typical heights of 55 feet or higher
with multiple fixtures installed at the top of the pole. Area lighting typically
represents the lighting of an outdoor area, such as a parking lot.
Management's long-term objective is to transform Catalyst from a broker of
commodity lighting poles to a value-added manufacturer and distributor of
lighting fixtures, poles and other accessories. This strategy has four
cornerstone initiatives. The first is the upgrade of our sales distribution
network by (a) hiring Henry Glover, a 20-year veteran of the lighting industry,
as President, (b) establishing formal sales agency relationships with nearly 75
lighting manufacturers' representatives providing nearly 100% geographic
coverage in the United States, and (c) establishing direct relationships with
over 25 OEM's and national accounts.
Secondly, we are completing the process of moving fabrication of select products
in-house to eliminate intermediaries, maintain gross margins and create
opportunities for additional profitability as operating efficiencies and
economies of scale are achieved. This move has also placed us in geographic
proximity with our powder-coating vendor, which has facilities adjacent to ours.
We recently moved to new facilities and transitioned fabrication and assembly of
round and square steel poles from a third party contract supplier to an in-house
function. We felt this initiative was required to keep pricing competitive in an
important product segment. The internal fabrication and assembly operations have
thus far produced fewer defects, reducing overall warranty costs, enhancing
production scheduling and freight consolidation.
We have historically offered aluminum poles on a brokered basis as an
accommodation to our sales agents. With two aluminum pole manufacturers holding
more than 80% of this market, sales agents that do not carry these lines have
little alternative than to work with the leading fixture OEMs. Sales agents and
fixture OEMs have expressed an interest in our producing aluminum poles,
indicating a ready market that, historically, will pay a premium for shorter
lead times (typical lead times in peak season run 12 to 18 weeks). To take
advantage of this potentially lucrative market, we must be able to efficiently
produce quality aluminum poles in-house. We believe the sales potential is
significant over a two-to-three-year time frame.
We began producing non-tapered aluminum poles, which is a less capital intensive
process than round tapered poles, in October, 2004. We expect to begin producing
round tapered poles during late fiscal year 2005 upon successful integration of
non-tapered aluminum poles. In peak season, we will need to carry approximately
$500,000 in inventory in order to supply poles in four to six weeks (a time
frame nearly half the industry standard). Our current gross margin on brokered
aluminum pole products is approximately 10% to 15%. Based on preliminary
assessments, we expect to generate a gross margin closer to 30% on aluminum pole
sales as a result of producing these poles in-house. To fully leverage the sales
opportunity in this market, we will need both the non-tapered and tapered
capabilities in place. With only two competitors in this market, we believe we
can become a true "player" in this, the second largest segment of the outdoor
5
lighting pole market, in short order and with little capital investment. Once
production is fully up and running, we intend to establish a new branded
aluminum pole line and market it through a separate agency network. We believe
that with only two competitors in this market, many of our existing agents may
already represent one of these manufacturers. Where this occurs, we would keep
our existing agent and still market the different brand of aluminum poles to
other agents in order to gain maximum penetration in each geographic market.
Our third strategic initiative was to add an engineering department and leverage
our existing database of product designs and engineering specifications to
expand product offerings for sale through our distribution network. We now have
over 500 SKU's, which include steel, galvanized and aluminum poles for area,
sports, high mast and roadway applications for sale to the
commercial/industrial, municipal and utility market segments.
We believe we are one of the first in the outdoor lighting pole industry to
provide access to our catalog items through the Internet. Through the addition
of an engineering department, we further enhanced our value added capabilities
by completing an electronic database of all product drawings and engineering
calculations. This information is now delivered electronically to our sales
representatives on a customized, project specific format minutes from the time
requested. This service provides critical information for the sales
representative to deliver to architects and engineers responsible for specifying
projects. This database now houses well over 1,000 product designs and
calculations.
In the process of completing the database, we also created a unique engineering
calculation program allowing for quick turnaround of custom pole designs. This
program also provides the capability of completing multiple iterations for the
end customers' designers to utilize during the creation process. This combined
ability, unique in the pole industry, keeps the sales representative and the end
customer in close contact from creation to completion without unnecessary
delays.
Our catalog database, drawings and calculations have led to prompt delivery of
project specific information and the manufacture and delivery of a highly
diverse product offering, which we believe has differentiated us from our
competitors. This integrated system is easily usable and scalable for additional
product offerings.
The final component of our strategy involves the potential acquisition of
additional niche product companies using public stock, cash or a combination
thereof in an attempt to dramatically increase the sales of those products by
introducing them into our own distribution network.
According to the United States Department of Commerce and the National
Electrical Manufacturer's Association, the U.S. outdoor lighting industry -
including fixtures, poles and accessories - represents a nearly $2 billion
market that has grown by more than 75% over the last 10 years, driven in part by
the growth in commercial development. This market has various participants,
including companies concentrating solely on structures, poles or lighting
fixtures, with a limited line of pole products. We believe this fragmented
market presents the opportunity to continue our growth plan with a more
diversified product line and expanded sales agency coverage. Management believes
6
this market, coupled with recent merger and acquisition activity within the
industry, bodes well for a "build-up" acquisition strategy. As the demand for,
and value of, businesses in this highly fragmented sector continues to increase,
we believe we are well positioned to pursue accretive acquisitions at value
prices, gain new customers and product offerings, and become an attractive
acquisition candidate ourselves as we seeks increased market share.
We seek to acquire one or two companies at the lower end of the revenue range
initially. Based on the initial results of these early acquisitions, and many
other factors to be determined, we intend on targeting larger acquisitions to
aggressively grow our consolidated revenues and potential profitability.
We sought to make acquisitions during fiscal year 2004. However, despite
preliminary discussions with, and bids on, potential targets, we were ultimately
unsuccessful in our efforts. In some cases, our bid was lower than that of a
third party, as companies with greater financial, distribution or other
resources value a potential acquisition differently than we do, enabling them to
make a higher offer. Additionally, the absence of either immediately available
acquisition financing or a more developed trading market for our common stock
for use as acquisition currency have presented obstacles. We anticipate
continuing to be an aggressive shopper but a conservative buyer as we attempt
growth through acquisition.
Competition
Catalyst competes with pole manufacturers as well as those OEM's which
manufacture poles themselves. In terms of sales, we believe we are approximately
in the bottom half of the top 10 pole manufacturing companies. We compete
against exclusive pole manufacturers such as K-W Industries, United Lighting
Standards, Hapco and Valmont Industries. Some OEM's that also manufacture poles
include Hubbell Lighting, Cooper Lighting, Musco Lighting (in the sports segment
only) and Ruud Lighting. We compete with other pole companies on a price and
service basis and by seeking the most qualified, most connected sales agents and
OEM's in a given territory.
History
Whitco Sales, Inc. dates its original history to 1969, when it was formed by the
Pritchard family in Fort Worth, Texas. Whitco was originally formed to provide
both lighting and pole products. During the 1980's, Whitco made the decision to
concentrate on steel pole products sold through agents and OEM's throughout the
United States. Whitco Company, L.L.P., a partnership consisting of three
investors led by Dennis H. Depenbusch, was formed on June 27, 2000 and acquired
the assets of Whitco Sales Inc. from the Pritchard family on June 30, 2000. At
the time of the acquisition, Whitco Sales, Inc. was an S Corporation 50% owned
by James and Patsy Pritchard and 50% owned by James K. "Kip" Pritchard. Dennis
H. Depenbusch currently serves as our Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and
Chairman of our Board of Directors. Whitco has no subsidiaries.
Upon acquisition of Whitco in June 2000, Whitco expanded its product offering to
include additional steel products as well as aluminum poles. In 2002, Whitco
7
further expanded its product line to include pre-wired products for the sports
lighting segment. On May 1, 2002, two of the three original investors were
bought out by a replacement investor group again led by Dennis H. Depenbusch.
The original investors, along with Mr. Depenbusch, were Mega Investment Group,
LLC and Quest Financial Partners, LP. Their 2/3 partnership interest was
purchased on May 1, 2002 for $1.2 million through the sale of partner units and
the issuance of additional subordinated debt. Four individual investors
purchased partnership units for a cumulative price of $654,000 and subordinated
debt was issued to four individual investors for $546,000.
As of February 12, 2003, Whitco entered into the Securities Exchange Agreement
with Wentworth III, Inc., pursuant to which its partners received, through an
exchange of all of their partnership units and options to purchase partnership
units, 2,991,368 shares of common stock, and options to purchase 808,632 shares
of common stock. This transaction closed on August 27, 2003, at which time
Whitco became Wentworth III, Inc.'s wholly-owned subsidiary.
Catalyst was formed under the name Wentworth III, Inc. as a "blank check"
Delaware corporation in March 2001 to effect a merger, exchange of capital
stock, asset acquisition or other similar business combination with an operating
business which the Company believes has significant growth potential. The
Company filed a registration statement on Form SB-2 with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, which became effective August 6, 2002, and the Company
commenced an offering of its common stock pursuant to this effective
Registration Statement. This offering closed in November 2002, raising proceeds
of $50,000 from the sale of 50,000 shares of common stock. The offering was a
"blank check" offering due to management's broad discretion with respect to the
specific application of the net proceeds thereof. Management had sole discretion
in determining which businesses to acquire, and the terms of such acquisition.
The offering was subject to Rule 419 of Regulation C under the Securities Act of
1933, as amended. Rule 419 requires that offering proceeds (except for an amount
up to 10% of the deposited funds) and the securities issued to investors must be
deposited in an escrow account and not released until an acquisition conforming
to certain specified criteria has been consummated and a sufficient number of
investors reconfirm their investment in accordance with the procedures set forth
in that rule.
As of February 12, 2003, we entered into a Securities Exchange Agreement with
Whitco Company, L.L.P., a Texas limited liability partnership which
manufactures, markets and distributes outdoor lighting poles. The Company filed
a post-effective amendment to the Registration Statement with the SEC describing
Whitco and its business, and included audited financial statements which, upon
being declared effective by the SEC, were delivered to all investors in
Wentworth's initial offering. Those investors were given the opportunity to
evaluate the merits and risks of the Whitco acquisition and all investors
elected to remain investors in Wentworth. On August 27, 2003, we acquired Whitco
Company, LP (successor in interest as a result of the conversion of Whitco
Company, L.L.P. to a limited partnership) through an exchange of all of Whitco's
partnership units, and options to purchase partnership units, for 2,991,368
shares of common stock, and options to purchase 808,632 shares of common stock.
Whitco became our wholly-owned subsidiary.
On August 29, 2003, we formed Catalyst Lighting Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation and purchased 200 shares of its common stock for an aggregate of
8
$2,000. On September 2, 2003, we entered into an Agreement of Merger with
Catalyst. On September 3, 2003, we filed with the Delaware Secretary of State a
Certificate of Ownership and Merger of Catalyst Lighting Group, Inc. into
Wentworth III, Inc. Pursuant to such certificate, and in accordance with Section
253(b) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, we changed our name to Catalyst
Lighting Group, Inc.
The selection of Whitco was complex and risky because of competition for such
business opportunities among all segments of the financial community. In
evaluating Whitco, the Company considered various factors, including, but not
limited to:
o costs associated with effecting a business combination
o equity interest in and possible management participation in Whitco
o growth potential of Whitco and its industry
o experience and skill of management and availability of additional
personnel of Whitco
o capital requirements of Whitco
o competitive position of Whitco
o potential for further research, development or exploration
o degree of current or potential market acceptance of
product/service
o risk factors
o regulatory environment of Whitco's industry
o profit potential
The evaluation of the business combination with Whitco was based on relevant
factors as listed above as well as other considerations consistent with the
Company's business objective. Management conducted a due diligence review which
encompassed, among other things, meeting with management and inspection of
facilities, as well as a review of financial or other information made available
to the Company.
Currently, we conduct all of our business through Whitco, our wholly owned
subsidiary.
Seasonality
The lighting and pole industry is seasonal in nature, as construction of the
facilities or roads where the lighting structures may be placed is seasonal
depending on the geographic location of the project.
Governmental and Environmental Regulations
We do not need government approval to offer our products and services. In order
to comply with federal, state and local environmental laws, we expend such sums
of money as is reasonably required in the ordinary course of our manufacturing
business. In fiscal year ended September 30, 2004, we spent $0 on such
compliance. Compliance with all such environmental laws has had a negligible
impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Research and Development
9
For the twelve months ended September 30, 2004, product development expense was
$0, compared with $138,863 for the twelve months ended September 30, 2003. The
decrease in product development for the comparative twelve-month period is
principally attributable to ceasing further development of Whitco's sports
lighting product offering.
Accounting Treatment
Although we are the parent corporation, for accounting purposes, our acquisition
of Whitco was treated as the acquisition of us by Whitco. This is known as a
reverse acquisition and a recapitalization of Whitco. Whitco is the acquirer for
accounting purposes because the former partners of Whitco received the larger
percentage of our common stock and voting rights than our stockholders prior to
the acquisition.
Public Filings
Our annual, quarterly and periodic and other filings with the SEC, including any
amendments thereto, may be accessed, at no cost, directly through the SEC's web
site at www.sec.gov.
RISK FACTORS
An investment in our securities is highly speculative and subject to numerous
and substantial risks. These risks include those set forth below and elsewhere
in this prospectus. Readers are encouraged to review these risks carefully
before making any investment decision.
WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO RAISE SUFFICIENT CAPITAL TO SUCCESSFULLY OPERATE OR EXPAND
OUR BUSINESS.
Our current and intended business operations require substantial capital
expenditures. If we cannot obtain additional capital, we may have to delay or
postpone acquisitions, development or research expenditures which can be
expected to harm our competitive position, business operations and growth
potential. Funding is expected to come through sales of products and services,
equity financing, current and future vendor financing, equipment leases and bank
lines of credit or loans, which may not be available on commercially reasonable
terms, if at all. If sales or revenues do not meet expectations, or cost
estimates for development and expansion of our business prove to be inaccurate,
we will require additional funding. Changes in capital markets and the cost of
capital are unpredictable. We cannot be sure that we will be able to secure
additional financing on acceptable terms. Any failure to obtain such financing,
or obtaining financing on terms not favorable to us, can be expected to have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations and future business prospects. Certain of the documents governing our
existing debt and equity securities contain restrictions on our ability to raise
additional capital, including, in certain circumstances, requiring the consent
of the holders of our existing securities.
10
WE ARE NOT CURRENTLY PROFITABLE AND MAY NEVER BECOME PROFITABLE.
We expect to incur losses and negative operating cash flow for the foreseeable
future, and we may never achieve or maintain profitability. Even if we succeed
with our current business plan, we may never become profitable. We also expect
to continue to incur operating and capital expenditures for items such as
salary, inventory, shipping and other ongoing business activities.
We also expect to experience negative cash flow for the foreseeable future as we
fund our operating losses and capital expenditures. As a result, we will need to
generate significant revenues in order to achieve and maintain profitability. We
may not be able to generate these revenues or achieve profitability in the
future. Our failure to achieve or maintain profitability can be expected to have
a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations and future business prospects.
THERE COULD BE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AMONG MANAGEMENT WHICH MAY BE ADVERSE TO
YOUR INTERESTS.
Conflicts of interest create the risk that management may have an incentive to
act adversely to the interests of other investors. A conflict of interest may
arise between our management's personal pecuniary interest and its fiduciary
duty to our stockholders. Our officers and directors currently own approximately
46% of the outstanding common stock. Although management does not have voting
control of the Company, management will continue to have day to day operating
control of the Company and a large voting block of the common stock. Such
influence may not necessarily be consistent with the interests of our other
stockholders.
IF WE RAISE ADDITIONAL FUNDS THROUGH THE ISSUANCE OF OUR EQUITY SECURITIES, OR
DETERMINE IN THE FUTURE TO REGISTER ANY COMMON STOCK, YOUR PERCENTAGE OWNERSHIP
WILL BE REDUCED, YOU WILL EXPERIENCE DILUTION WHICH COULD SUBSTANTIALLY DIMINISH
THE VALUE OF YOUR STOCK AND SUCH ISSUANCE MAY CONVEY RIGHTS, PREFERENCES OR
PRIVILEGES SENIOR TO YOUR RIGHTS WHICH COULD SUBSTANTIALLY DIMINISH YOUR RIGHTS
AND THE VALUE OF YOUR STOCK.
We may issue additional shares of common stock for various reasons and may grant
additional stock options to employees, officers, directors and third parties. If
we determine to register for sale to the public additional shares of common
stock granted in any future financing or business combination, a material amount
of dilution can be expected to cause the market price of our common stock to
decline. One of the factors which generally affects the market price of publicly
traded equity securities is the number of shares outstanding in relationship to
assets, net worth, earnings or anticipated earnings. Furthermore, the public
perception of future dilution can have the same effect even if actual dilution
does not occur.
In order for us to obtain additional capital or complete a business combination,
we may find it necessary to issue securities, including but not limited to any
or all shares of preferred stock, conveying rights senior to those of the
11
holders of common stock. Those rights may include voting rights, liquidation
preferences and conversion rights. To the extent we convey senior rights, the
value of our common stock can be expected to decline.
In addition, substantially all of our outstanding warrants and convertible debt
contain "anti-dilution" protection, which are designed to provide the holders of
such securities with rights to additional securities should we issue, or be
deemed to issue, common stock below the exercise or conversion price of such
securities, or in certain cases, below the then effective market price for the
common stock. Such provisions will have the effect of further diluting existing
holders of our common stock.
IF WE INCUR MORE INDEBTEDNESS, WE MAY BECOME TOO HIGHLY LEVERAGED AND WOULD BE
IN RISK OF DEFAULT.
There is no contractual or regulatory limit to the amount of debt we can take
on, although we intend to follow a conservative debt policy. If our policy were
to change or be eliminated due to unforeseen circumstances, we could become more
highly leveraged, which could adversely affect our ability to meet our
obligations and we would then be in risk of default, which could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, business
prospects and long term future viability.
WE LACK BUSINESS DIVERSIFICATION AS WE OPERATE IN ONE BUSINESS IN ONE INDUSTRY,
WHICH MAKES US SUBJECT TO ALL THE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES OF THAT INDUSTRY.
As Whitco is currently our sole operating business, the prospects for our
success are entirely dependent upon the future performance of a single business.
Unlike other entities with resources to consummate several business
combinations, or entities operating in multiple industries, we do not expect to
have the resources to diversify our operations or benefit from the possible
spreading of risks or offsetting of losses.
THERE IS INTENSE COMPETITION IN THE LIGHTING INDUSTRY WHICH MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT
OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION AND YOUR INVESTMENT IN OUR COMMON STOCK.
There are numerous competitors in the fields in which Whitco is currently
involved and in which it intends to enter, many of which have developed product
lines and established customer followings. We also expect competition to
increase in the future. Increased competition is likely to result in price
reductions, reduced gross margins and loss of market share, any of which could
harm our net revenue and results of operations. Whitco competes or will
potentially compete with a variety of companies, many of which have operated for
a longer period of time and have significantly greater financial, technical,
marketing and other resources. Some of these competitors have established
relationships with leading manufacturers, suppliers, wholesalers, distributors
and sales representatives. These competitors include national wholesalers and
national and regional distributors, some of which Whitco already has existing
relationships with. Further, we face a significant competitive challenge from
alliances entered into between and among our competitors, as well as from
competitors created through industry consolidation. The combined resources of
12
these partnerships or consolidated entities could pose a significant competitive
challenge and could impede us in, or prevent us from, establishing relationships
which would be most beneficial.
WE ARE DEPENDENT ON A FEW MANUFACTURERS TO MAKE THE TUBES REQUIRED FOR OUR POLE
BUSINESS.
Our primary business is selling lighting poles in a variety of market segments.
Although we own the raw material and have this year moved the majority of our
manufacturing in-house, we use various manufacturers to supply our raw tubes. A
significant portion of these tubes are supplied by Trans America Power Products.
Although we believe we can secure other fabricators, we expect that the
deterioration or cessation of either relationship would have a material adverse
effect, at least temporarily, until the new relationships are satisfactorily in
place.
WE SUTAINED LOSSES IN THE FISCAL YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 AND 2003.
The Company incurred a net loss for fiscal years 2004 and 2003 of ($1,532,539)
and ($1,005,515). The losses were partly attributable in 2004 to significant
price increases in raw materials, manufacturing inefficiencies associated with
the move to in-house production, charges associated with early termination of
our factoring agreement with Marquette Commercial Finance, and expenses
associated with being a public company. In 2003, the losses were partly
attributable to nonrecurring expenses related to the merger and preparing for
the public offering which ended on May 26, 2004.
WE MAY BE SUBJECT TO LAWSUITS AS A RESULT OF THE MANUFACTURE, DESIGN AND
INSTALLATION OF OUR LIGHTING POLES, WHICH COULD BE COSTLY AND DIVERT NEEDED
RESOURCES AWAY FROM OPERATIONS.
We are currently involved in three legal proceedings, as described in the "Legal
Proceedings" section herein. Although we do not believe any of the current
lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on our business or future
prospects, we face the risk of lawsuits from property owners, federal and state
governments and any injured parties from accidents alleged to occur as a result
of the manufacture, design or installation of the lighting poles and fixtures.
Any lawsuit, even if without merit, could divert needed time, money and other
resources from our business. Although we currently have property, general
liability and product liability insurance in amounts we believe to be adequate,
we can give no assurance such insurance will remain available at a reasonable
price, if at all, or that any insurance policy would offer coverage sufficient
to meet any liability arising as a result of a claim. The obligation to pay any
substantial liability claim could render us insolvent and could force it to
curtail or suspend operations, which would have a material adverse effect on
your investment. Additionally, failure to implement and maintain a quality
control program with respect to the manufacture and installation of poles could
increase the risk of liability for any injury that may occur from one of our
poles.
EFFORTS TO PROTECT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OR THE ALLEGED MISUSE OF THE
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OF OTHERS MAY CAUSE US TO BECOME INVOLVED IN COSTLY AND
13
LENGTHY REGULATORY PROCESSES OR LITIGATION WHICH COULD DIVERT NEEDED RESOURCES
AWAY FROM OPERATIONS.
Our success depends, in part, on our ability to obtain and preserve patent,
trademark and other intellectual property rights, including with respect to the
software created in connection with our business, services, products and the
pole designs they create. The process of seeking trademark and patent protection
and defending claims is time consuming and expensive and no assurances can be
given that (i) patents or trademarks will actually be issued, (ii) new patents
will be sufficient in scope to provide meaningful protection or any commercial
advantage or (iii) others will not independently develop similar products or
design around any patents we may obtain. If we fail to protect intellectual
property from infringement, other companies may offer competitive products.
Additionally, we may have to defend ourselves against claims we infringe the
intellectual property rights of others. Protection of our intellectual property,
and defense of our own products and services, could result in costly and lengthy
litigation, diverting resources which would otherwise be dedicated to managing
the business.
WE MAY NEED TO EXPEND TIME AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES TO LEARN AND COMPETE IN THOSE
PARTS OF THE INDUSTRY WHICH WE INTEND TO ENTER FOR THE FIRST TIME WHICH COULD
DIVERT NEEDED RESOURCES AWAY FROM OPERATIONS.
Our current business strategy contemplates entering parts of the lighting
industry in which we have not previously competed, through either acquisitions
of current participants in those markets or in-house development of such
capabilities. Although these segments of the market are directly related to the
current market in which we compete, we expect to take time and financial
resources to learn the nuances of these segments, as well as to execute on the
business plan and integrate these new parts of the business into our existing
business. Any failure in these new markets or failure to successfully integrate
them into our existing business could be expected to have a material adverse
effect on our financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.
WE MAY NOT BE ABLE TO SUCCESSFULLY INTEGRATE ACQUIRED BUSINESSES, IF ANY, WHICH
COULD RESULT IN A DECREASE IN OUR CASH RESOURCES AND ULTIMATELY LEAD TO
INCREASES IN ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE WRITE-OFFS.
Although we are continuously seeking out possible acquisition candidates, the
Company has not completed an acquisition to date. Once a candidate is found and
an acquisition completed, we anticipate that our acquisition strategy will
result in a labor-intensive process to integrate new businesses into our
existing business. This can shift focus away from our existing business. The
successful integration of an acquired business is also dependent on the size of
the acquired business, the complexity of system conversions, the resolution of
disputes regarding multiple sales representatives in a given geographic area and
management's execution of the integration plan. If we are not successful in
integrating acquired businesses, our results may be adversely affected.
14
A SLOWDOWN IN THE CONSTRUCTION CYCLE OR ANY REDUCTION IN THE INFRASTRUCTURE
NEEDS OF FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE
IMPACT ON OUR BUSINESS AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Our primary market segments include sports arenas, area lighting, such as
parking lot lighting for shopping malls and apartment complexes, high mast
lighting and roadway lighting. In the private sector, we are dependent on the
construction industry to continue building the arenas and other complexes which
require lighting poles. With regard to roadway lighting, we are dependent on the
needs and financial health of federal, state and local governments. Both the
private and public sectors are highly dependent on general economic conditions.
Accordingly, any reduction in the construction cycle, dip in the economy or
deterioration of the financial health of the federal and state governments could
be expected to have a material adverse effect on our business and financial
condition.
WE ARE DEPENDENT ON THE PRICE OF STEEL AND PRICE INCREASES COULD HAVE AN IMPACT
ON OUR FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
Because we make the majority of our lighting poles out of steel, our profit
margins are dependent on the price of the raw steel tubes purchased from time to
time. We have no impact on or ability to control or otherwise manage the price
we pay for raw steel. The major steel purchasers could either mark prices down,
which could result in decreased revenues for us as we pass the savings on to
customers, or cause an increase in prices, which could also reduce our profit
margin if it is determined that customers would rather delay their purchases
than pay higher prices or if customers purchase poles from a cheaper source. The
Company experienced such an increase in fiscal year 2004 which had a material
impact on gross profit. Although we could buy more steel when prices are low and
less when prices are high, such a strategy could lead to either excess
inventory, which would lead to increased fabrication and storage costs, or
insufficient inventory.
THE EXISTENCE OF OUTSTANDING OPTIONS AND WARRANTS MAY HARM OUR ABILITY TO OBTAIN
ADDITIONAL FINANCING AND THEIR EXERCISE WILL RESULT IN DILUTION TO YOUR
INTERESTS.
We have outstanding (a) 644,100 warrants outstanding to purchase an aggregate of
644,100 shares of common stock and (b) incentive options to purchase 843,632
shares of common stock, with 630,519 of such options currently vested.
Additionally, our option plan reserves an additional 656,368 shares for future
issuance. While these warrants and options are outstanding, our ability to
obtain future financing may be harmed. Upon exercise of these options and
warrants, dilution to your ownership interests will occur as the number of
common shares outstanding increases.
15
Reliance upon third-party suppliers for components and raw materials may place
us at risk of interruption of supply or increase in costs.
We rely on third-party suppliers for the component parts used in the
manufacturing process and we do not have any long-term supply agreements. We run
the risk of supplier price increases and component shortages. Additionally,
competition for materials in short supply can be intense, and we may not be able
to compete effectively against other purchasers who have higher volume
requirements or more established vendor relationships. Even if suppliers have
adequate supplies of components, they may be unreliable in meeting delivery
schedules, experience their own financial difficulties, provide components of
inadequate quality or provide them at prices which reduce our profit. Any
problems with our third-party suppliers can be expected to have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition, business, results of operations and
continued growth prospects.
Manufacturing operations involve inventory risk.
Our manufacturing projects involve a substantial amount of resources and
inventory risk. We may have to expend resources for parts, manufacturing,
inventory and warehousing prior to payment for these services. In light of
normal business risks to our customers, there can be no guarantee that we will
receive payment in full for these expenditures. Additionally, pricing changes
could adversely impact our selling price, gross margins and operating results.
Because of the many variables of the manufacturing industry, there can be no
assurance that we can successfully execute our business plan.
Our business plan includes a number of inherent execution risks. As
manufacturers of lighting poles and accessories, we run the risk of, among other
things, failing to provide products or providing inadequate products. Because
our business requires substantial fixed assets, we will not be profitable if we
do not realize sufficient revenue growth to make maximum use of our capacity.
The continued success of our business will depend upon our ability to deliver
quality products as a value-added partner. In order to do this effectively, we
must hire, train and expand our qualified engineering and technical staff.
Failure to realize some or all of our business objectives can be expected to
have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and continued
viability.
Ongoing success and ability to compete depend upon retention of key personnel.
Our future success depends on the continued services of our executive staff, as
well as our key engineering, technical, sales and support personnel. These
individuals have critical industry experience and relationships upon which we
rely. The loss of services of any of our key personnel could divert time and
resources, delay the development of our business and negatively affect our
ability to sell our services or execute our business. Such problems might be
16
expected to have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results
of current operations and future business prospects.
FAILURE TO EXECUTE ON OUR ACQUISITION AND NEW MARKET STRATEGY MAY HAVE AN IMPACT
ON OUR ABILITY TO REMAIN A PUBLICLY TRADED COMPANY.
Part of our business strategy involves growth either through acquiring companies
in complementary areas of the lighting industry or entering directly into those
markets ourselves. In either event, this requires a substantial expenditure of
time, money and other valuable resources. Not only does this take resources away
from our current business, but there is the chance that our strategy will not
ultimately be successful. In such event, it is likely the continued costs
associated with being a public reporting company will outweigh the anticipated
organic growth of our current business, which could result in our being
delisted, going private or seeking a sale of the company.
There is, at present, only a limited market for our common stock and there can
be no assurance this market will continue.
Our common stock is traded on the OTC Bulletin Board. Trades are subject to Rule
15g-9 of the Securities and Exchange Commission, which imposes certain
requirements on broker-dealers who sell securities to persons other than
established customers and accredited investors. For transactions covered by this
rule, broker-dealers must make a special suitability determination for
purchasers of the securities and receive the purchaser's written agreement to
the transaction prior to sale. The SEC also has rules that regulate
broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in "penny stocks". Penny
stocks generally are equity securities with a price per share of less than $5.00
(other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or
quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information
with respect to transactions in that security are provided by the exchange or
system). The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction
in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized
risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC that provides information about
penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The
broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer
quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its
salesperson in the transaction and monthly account statements showing the market
value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. The bid and offer
quotations, and the broker-dealer and salesperson compensation information, must
be given to the customer orally or in writing prior to effecting the transaction
and must be given to the customer in writing before or with the customer's
confirmation. These disclosure requirements have the effect of reducing the
level of trading activity in the secondary market for our common stock. As a
result of these rules, investors may find selling their shares to be complex and
time consuming.
THE VALUE OF THE COMMON STOCK MAY BE DIMINISHED BY THE ISSUANCE OF PREFERRED
STOCK.
Our Board of Directors is authorized by our certificate of incorporation to
designate and issue up to 10,000,000 shares of one or more series of preferred
17
stock, which will have such designations, rights and preferences as may be
determined from time to time by the Board. Accordingly, the Board of Directors
is empowered, without stockholder approval, to issue preferred stock with
dividend, liquidation, conversion, voting or other rights which could adversely
affect the voting power or other rights of the holders of the common stock. The
preferred stock could be utilized to discourage, delay or prevent a change in
control. Although we have no present intention to issue any shares of preferred
stock, there can be no assurance we will not do so in the future.
OUR CURRENT CASH FLOW MAY NOT BE SUFFICIENT TO CONTINUE BUSINESS OPERATIONS
THROUGH THE END OF THE FISCAL YEAR, SEPTEMBER 30, 2005.
Due in part to our failure thus far to raise the minimum amount in our private
placement which began in October, 2004, as well as the expenses associated with
being a public, reporting company, our current cash flow is very limited and may
not be sufficient to continue business operations beyond September 30, 2005.
Should sales in the coming quarter not meet our expectations, this time period
could be compressed due to lack of sufficient cash flow to sustain operations.
While we hope to raise additional funds in the near future, and have reduced
expenses from prior levels, there can be no assurances that we can get revenues
to exceed our expenses in the next six to nine months. In such event, we will be
forced to scale back our operations, curtail future acquisition activity and/or
seek a sale of the company.
Item 2. Description of Property
We entered into a five year lease with BMF, LLC on December 31, 2003 to lease
approximately 38,171 square feet of office and manufacturing space at 7700 Wyatt
Drive, Fort Worth, Texas. These facilities serve as our corporate headquarters,
operations center, and manufacturing site. The rent is payable in monthly
installments at $10,338 and the term expires on November 30, 2008. The lease
includes a one-time right to terminate the lease in June of 2006. A termination
fee, equal to the unamortized portion of certain allowances given to us for
improvements to the property, is payable upon exercising the termination clause.
The allowances totaled $22,500.
We believe our current physical facilities to be in satisfactory condition and
will be sufficient to accommodate all of our business needs through at least
fiscal year end 2005.
We currently do not have, nor do we anticipate making, any investments in real
estate, mortgages or real estate related securities in the foreseeable future.
In the event we determine to make such an investment, or adopt a policy relating
thereto, there is a chance it would be done without a vote of our security
holders.
It is not our policy to acquire assets primarily for possible capital gain or
primarily for income.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
During the year ended September 30, 2004, there were three legal proceedings to
which we became a party or to which any of our assets or properties were
subject.
On April 28, 2004, FWT, Inc. sued the Company for breach of contract and
attorney's fees. The lawsuit relates to an unpaid purchase order in the amount
18
of $30,609.00 which is disputed by the Company. The Company filed an answer on
June 8, 2004 and in addition to denying liability to FWT, the Company asserted
claims for breach of contract and negligence against a third party, Double R
Transport and Farms, Inc. ("Double R"). The Company has reached an agreement in
principle to settle its claims against Double R and it intends to vigorously
defend itself against FWT's claims.
The second matter was an Application for Mechanic's and Materialman's Lien;
Demand for Payment; Notice of Mechanic's and Materialman's Lien and Demand for
Payment filed in the Circuit Court of the Third Circuit, State of Hawaii filed
June 4, 2004 (the "Application"). This application was filed by GE Sports
Lighting Systems, LLP ("GE") against Whitco and Kamehameha Schools/Bernice
Pauahi Bishop Estate (the "Estate"), Hawaiian Dredging/Kajima and Does 1-50. GE
is a contractor of a project to build sports complexes at two different schools
on property owned by the Estate and hired us to provide lighting poles for the
project. GE claims it is owed $313,385. Although it is not expressly stated in
the Application, based on subsequent discussions with all parties, it appears
the Estate withheld payment from GE due to the installation of the lighting
poles using bolts that were different from those originally ordered. We proposed
a fix which was approved in writing by both GE and the Estate. We then
implemented this fix and have received verbal approval of such fix from all
parties, including an independent architect hired by the Estate. Although the
next appearance before the court on the Application is currently scheduled for
January 12, 2005, we have been notified verbally that once all written approvals
have been received by GE, the Application will be withdrawn.
On September 27, 2004, the Trustee for the Warren Electric Group, Ltd.
bankruptcy estate sued the Company for recovery of $17,250.00 allegedly paid
to the Company in the 90 days prior to Warren Electric's bankruptcy. The
Company's answer date is November 22, 2004 and the Company intends to
vigorously defend itself against this claim.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
None.
PART II
Item 5. Market for Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters
Our common stock is currently quoted on the National Quotation Bureau's
Over-the-Counter Electronic Bulletin Board under the symbol "CYSL.OB." Our
Common Stock began trading on the OTC Bulletin Board on June 28, 2004. Set forth
below are the range of high and low bid quotations for the periods indicated as
reported by the OTC Bulletin Board. The market quotations reflect interdealer
prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commissions and may not necessarily
represent actual transactions.
Quarter Ending High Low
06/30/04 $3.00 $2.75
09/30/04 $2.85 $2.65
Holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends as may be declared
by our Board of Directors and, in the event of liquidation, to share pro rata in
19
any distribution of assets after payment of liabilities. The Board of Directors
is not obligated to declare a dividend. We have not paid any dividends and do
not have any current plans to pay any dividends. Our relationship with Laurus
Master Funds, Ltd. restricts our ability to pay dividends. In addition, the
terms of such indebtedness prevents Whitco from paying dividends to Catalyst,
which has the effect of precluding us from paying dividends with respect to the
common stock.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Plan category Number of Weighted-average Number of
securities to be exercise price of securities
issued upon outstanding remaining
exercise of options, warrants available for
outstanding and rights future issuance
options, warrants under equity
and rights compensation
plans (excluding
securities
reflected in
column (a))
(a) (b) (c)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equity
compensation
plans approved by
security holders
2003 Stock Option Plan 843,632 $.70 656,368
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Equity
compensation
plans not
approved by
security holders
7,100 (1) $3.125
165,000 (2) $2.485
472,000 (3) $3.00
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Total 1,487,732 $1.639 656,368
(1) In connection with our registered public offering, one placement agent was
issued 7,100 warrants to purchase 7,100 shares of our common stock at a price of
$3.125 per share.
(2) On August 6, 2003, Whitco Company LLP received a bridge loan of $250,000
from Keating Reverse Merger Fund. In consideration for the note, and upon
consummation of Whitco's share exchange with us, we issued warrants for the
purchase of up to 125,000 shares of our common stock at a price of $2.00 per
warrant share. On August 22, 2004, in consideration for extending the due date
20
on the note to December 31, 2004, we issued an additional 40,000 warrants for
purchase of our common stock at a price of $4.00 per share.
(3) On September 30, 2004, the Company completed a $5 million financing facility
with Laurus Master Fund, Ltd., a New York City based institutional fund. In
connection with this financing the Company issued 472,000 warrants for purchase
of our common stock at a price of $3.00 per share to Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.
As of September 30, 2004, and in accordance with our 2003 Stock Option Plan,
there were incentive options outstanding to purchase 843,632 shares of common
stock, with 630,519 of such options currently vested. Twenty percent (20%) of
the non-vested options vest on each anniversary date of the option grant. The
holders of these options, their positions and the number of options held by
each, are as follows:
Weighted
Average
Name Title # Options Issued Exercise Price
------------ --------------------------- ---------------- --------------
Henry Glover President/CEO (of Whitco) 250,222 $ 0.86
Kevin B. Medlin Former Vice President Sales 98,279 $ 0.86
Thomas Lach Vice President Engineering 98,279 $ 0.86
Ben Mosqueda Manager Quotations/Drafting 11,727 $ 0.86
Kip Pritchard Vice President 350,125 $ 0.30
Brady Basil Chief Financial Officer 20,000 $ 2.50
Larry Richardson National Sales Manager 15,000 $ 2.50
Total 843,632
Additionally, our option plan reserves an additional 656,368 shares available
for future issuance.
As of September 30, 2004, there were approximately 71 holders of record of our
common stock, and there were a total of 3,756,051 shares of our common stock,
par value $0.01 per share, outstanding.
Our Board of Directors has not declared or paid any cash dividends since our
inception. As the Board of Directors' current policy is to retain any and all
earnings to fund our ongoing operations and growth, it does not anticipate
declaring or paying any cash dividends for the foreseeable future.
All employees are provided certain insurance coverages including health, dental,
life and long term disability. We reserve the right to change our benefits plans
as we deem necessary or appropriate.
We have no dividend reinvestment plan.
RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES
21
On May 1, 2002, the partnership interests of two of the three then-existing
partners of Whitco Company, L.L.P. were purchased for a total of $1.2 million. A
total of 436 2/3 partnership units were sold for $655,000, at a price per
partnership unit of $1,500, and $545,000 in subordinated debt. There were no
underwriters or commissions paid with respect to this or any other transaction
set forth in this Item 26. These securities were sold pursuant to an exemption
from the securities laws pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933,
as the offering of partnership interests was to a limited number of offerees
made without general solicitation in a non-public offering. Further, these
securities were exempted from the registration requirements pursuant to the safe
harbor of Regulation D, as Whitco also had a reasonable belief all investors
were "accredited", based on the subscription agreements executed by each
investor. Additionally, each investor made a representation they were accredited
investors under Rule 501(a) and that they had the necessary sophistication to be
able to fend for themselves. The following tables set out the purchase price and
amount of partnership units and subordinated debt issued with respect to this
transaction:
PARTNERSHIP UNITS ISSUED:
Total Purchase Partner Units Equivalent
Name Amount Purchased Common Shares
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Celestine C. Depenbusch $200,000 133 1/3 446,729
Larry D. Doskocil, Trustee of the
Larry D. Doskocil Living Trust
UAD February 20, 1986, as amended $250,000 166 2/3 558,412
John and Jacqueline
Middelkamp, JTWROS $ 50,000 33 1/3 111,683
June M. Ochsner, Trustee of the June M
Ochsner Revocable Trust dated
October 21, 1997 $ 50,000 33 1/3 111,683
Dennis H. Depenbusch $ 1,500 1 3,350
Dennis H. Depenbusch and Darcilyn
H. Depenbusch as co-trustees, or their
successors in trust, of the Dennis H
Depenbusch Revocable Trust, dated
December 21, 1998 $103,500 69 231,183
22
Subordinated Debt Issued:
Name Total Expiration Date Interest Rate
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Larry D. Doskocil, Trustee of the Larry
D. Doskocil Living Trust UAD February
20, 1986, as amended $250,000 May 1, 2004 15%
$ 20,000 May 1, 2007 15%
James K. "Kip" Pritchard $150,000 May 1, 2007 15%
Dennis H. Depenbusch and Darcilyn
H. Depenbusch as co-trustees, or
their successors in trust, of the Dennis H.
Depenbusch Revocable Trust,
Dated December 21, 1998 $ 75,000 May 1, 2007 15%
Jacqueline N. Middelkamp $ 50,000 May 1, 2007 15%
On January 31, 2003, all subordinated debt holders were offered the opportunity
to convert such debt into partnership units. These securities were sold pursuant
to an exemption from the securities laws pursuant to Section 4(2) of the
Securities Act of 1933, as the offering of partnership interests was to a
limited number of offerees with an ongoing relationship with Whitco and its
management, made without general solicitation in a non-public offering. The
following table sets out those note holders who chose to convert from debt to
equity:
Total Purchase Partner Units Equivalent
Name Amount Purchased Common Shares
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Celestine C. Depenbusch $ 50,000 7.56 25,330
Larry D. Doskocil, Trustee of
the Larry D. Doskocil Living
Trust UAD February 20,
1986, as amended $250,000 37.78 126,581
Dennis H. Depenbusch
and Darcilyn H. Depenbusch
as co-trustees, or their
successors in trust, of the
Dennis H. Depenbusch
Revocable Trust,
dated December 21, 1998 $ 75,000 11.48 38,462
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC. (formerly known as Wentworth III, Inc.)
The Company was formed as a Delaware corporation in March 2001 as a "blank
check" company to effect a merger, exchange of capital stock, asset acquisition
or other similar business combination with an operating business which the
23
Company believes has significant growth potential. The Company filed the
Registration Statement with the Commission, which became effective August 6,
2002, and the Company commenced the Offering, which closed in November 2002,
raising proceeds of $50,000 from the sale of 50,000 shares of common stock. The
Offering was a "blank check" offering due to management's broad discretion with
respect to the specific application of the net proceeds thereof. Management had
sole discretion in determining which businesses to acquire, and the terms of
such acquisition. The Offering was subject to Rule 419 under the Securities Act.
Rule 419 requires that offering proceeds (except for an amount up to 10% of the
deposited funds) and the securities issued to investors must be deposited in an
escrow account and not released until an acquisition conforming to certain
specified criteria has been consummated and a sufficient number of investors
reconfirm their investment in accordance with the procedures set forth in that
rule.
On August 27, 2003, we acquired Whitco Company, LP (successor in interest as a
result of conversion of Whitco Company, L.L.P. to a limited partnership) through
an exchange of all of Whitco's partnership units, and options to purchase
partnership units, for 2,991,368 shares of common stock, and options to purchase
808,632 shares of common stock. Whitco became our wholly-owned subsidiary. All
shares were issued without registration in reliance on one or more of the
following exemptions: Rule 701 and Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
The then issued and outstanding partnership units were converted into shares of
our common stock as follows:
Number of Shares of
Wentworth Common Stock
Partner Partnership Units received at closing
------- ----------------- -------------------
Dennis H. Depenbusch 1 3,350
June M. Ochsner Revocable Trust 33.33 111,671
Larry D. Doskocil Living Trust 204.45 685,004
Celestine C. Depenbusch 140.89 472,048
John M. and Jacqueline N.
Middlekamp, JTWROS 33.33 111,671
Dennis H. Depenbusch
Revocable Trust 479.82 1,607,624
Whitco granted a total of 241.3485 qualified options to five employees of
Whitco, giving each employee options to purchase partnership units of Whitco.
There were no underwriters, discounts or commissions paid in connection with the
granting of such options. Whitco did not receive any compensation for the
granting of such options as all options were issued in consideration for the
option holder's employment with Whitco. However, all options were exercisable
for cash consideration as set forth below. None of the options have been
exercised, but all were converted on August 27, 2003 to 808,632 options to
purchase our common stock pursuant to the Securities Exchange Agreement with
Whitco. All options were issued without registration in reliance on one or more
24
of the following exemptions: Rule 701 and Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of
1933. Below is a chart setting forth all such issuances:
Vesting
Partnership Units
Issue Granted Pursuant Price Per
Name Date Period to Option Unit
------------- -------- ------- ----------------- ---------
Kip Pritchard 6/30/00 0 105 $1,000
Tom Lach 10/30/00 5 years 22 $2,913
Kevin Medlin 10/1/01 5 years 22 $2,916
Henry Glover 1/1/02 0 years 57 $2,916
Henry Glover 12/31/02 0 years 17.5 $2,890
Tom Lach 12/31/02 0 years 7 $2,890
Kevin Medlin 12/31/02 0 years 7 $2,890
Ben Mosqueda 12/31/02 0 years 3.5 $2,890
The options listed above were converted into 10 year options to purchase
shares of Catalyst. There are 843,632 options issued through September 30,
2004. Vested options currently total 630,519 shares. Twenty percent (20%) of
the non-vested options vest on each anniversary date of the option grant. The
holders of these options, their position in the Company and the number of
options held by each, are as follows:
Weighted Average
Name Title # Options Issued Exercise Price
---------------- --------------------------- ---------------- ----------------
Henry Glover President 250,222 $ 0.86
Kevin B. Medlin Vice President Sales 98,279 $ 0.86
Thomas Lach Vice President Engineering 98,279 $ 0.86
Ben Mosqueda Manager Quotations/Drafting 11,727 $ 0.86
Kip Pritchard Vice President 350,125 $ 0.30
Brady Basil Chief Financial Officer 20,000 $ 2.50
Larry Richardson National Sales Manager 15,000 $ 2.50
Total 843,632
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC. (our former subsidiary)
On August 29, 2003, we formed Catalyst Lighting Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation, and purchased 200 shares of its common stock for an aggregate of
$2,000. On September 2, 2003, we entered into an Agreement of Merger with
Catalyst. On September 3, 2003, we filed with the Delaware Secretary of State a
Certificate of Ownership and Merger of Catalyst Lighting Group, Inc. into
Wentworth III, Inc.
On September 30, 2004, we authorized the sale to Laurus Master Fund, Ltd.
("Laurus") of (1) a Secured Convertible Term Note in the principal amount of two
million dollars ($2,000,000), which is convertible into our common stock at an
25
initial fixed conversion price of $2.66 per share (the "Term Note") and (2) a
Secured Revolving Note (the "Revolving Note") and a Secured Convertible Minimum
Borrowing Note (together with the Revolving Note, the "AR Notes") in the
aggregate principal amount of up to three million dollars ($3,000,000), which
are convertible into our common stock at an initial fixed conversion price of
$2.66 per share. Laurus also acquired a Common Stock Purchase Warrant for the
purchase of up to 472,000 shares of our common stock, exercisable until
September 30, 2009 at a price of $3.00 per share (the "Warrant"). The Term Note
and AR Notes (collectively, the "Notes") mature on September 30, 2007 and are
secured by a first priority lien on all of our collateral, including inventory,
accounts receivable, raw materials and all of its ownership interests in Whitco.
The Notes accrue interest at a rate per annum equal to the "prime rate"
published in The Wall Street Journal from time to time, plus two percent (2%),
but shall in no event be less than six percent (6%) per annum. We also granted
registration rights with respect to all shares of Common Stock underlying the
Notes and Warrant. Closing and funding occurred on September 30, 2004.
The $2,000,000 payment for the Term Note was placed into an escrow account
solely controlled by Laurus (the "Escrow Account"). We may request that Laurus
release all or any portion of the amounts contained in the Escrow Account
following, or in connection with, the consummation of an acquisition, joint
venture or capital investment (a "Transaction") by us or any of our
subsidiaries. Such a release is subject to Laurus' evaluation of all factors it
considers, in its sole discretion, relevant at the time of such requested
release, including its determination of (i) the relative benefit of such
Transaction to the Company and its subsidiaries and (ii) the overall performance
(financial or otherwise) of the Company and its subsidiaries at such time.
Laurus is under no obligation to release any amounts and the release of such
amounts is in Laurus' sole and absolute discretion.
The AR Notes were granted pursuant to an accounts receivable and inventory
financing line, a portion of which was used to pay off the Company's prior
accounts receivable lines with Marquette Commercial Finance, Inc. and Capital
Growth Asset Based Bridge Loan Fund II. Further advances of funds are based on
eligible accounts, as determined by Laurus in its sole discretion. Copies of the
Securities Purchase Agreement, Security Agreement, the Notes, the Warrant, the
Master Security Agreement and Registration Rights Agreement were filed as
exhibits to the Form 8-K filed by us with respect to the Transaction.
Keating Investments was the investment advisor for the reverse merger and
received an investment banking fee in common stock of 70,000, which was due upon
the Company's common stock trading on the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board. The
stock began trading on June 26, 2004. An individual employed by Keating
Investments also received 20,000 shares for services rendered.
Item 6. Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation.
This annual report on Form 10-KSB contains forward looking statements. Forward
looking statements are statements not based on historical information and that
relate to future operations, strategies, financial results or other
developments. Forward looking statements are necessarily based upon estimates
and assumptions that are inherently subject to significant business, economic
and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond our
control and many of which, with respect to future business decisions, are
26
subject to change. These uncertainties and contingencies can affect actual
results and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed
in any forward looking statements made by us or on our behalf. We disclaim any
obligation to update forward looking statements.
Plan of Operation
We were organized as a vehicle to seek, investigate and, if such investigation
warrants, acquire a target company or business that primarily desires to seek
the perceived advantages of a publicly-held corporation.
We formed under the name Wentworth III, Inc. in March, 2001 as a blank check
company, which is essentially a vehicle to pursue a business combination. We
offered our common stock to the public pursuant to Rule 419 promulgated under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and closed our offering, raising
proceeds of $50,000 from the sale of 50,000 shares, in November, 2002. We had no
operating business and all our activities since inception, and prior to the
share exchange with Whitco, had been related to formation, completing the public
offering and finding suitable merger or acquisition candidates. Pursuant to Rule
419, the gross proceeds from the offering of $50,000, less 10% for expenses
incurred in connection with the IPO, were held in escrow subject to the closing
of the transaction with Whitco. We paid no cash compensation to any officer or
director in their capacities as such prior to the transaction with Whitco. On
August 27, 2003, we completed the share exchange transaction with Whitco,
whereupon Whitco became our sole wholly-owned subsidiary. On September 3, 2003,
we changed our name to Catalyst Lighting Group, Inc.
Based on the above transactions, we have provided management's discussion and
analysis of financial condition and results of operations for Whitco for the
year ending September 30, 2004 and 2003 and for Catalyst Lighting Group, Inc.,
from the date of acquisition, August 27, 2003. For financial statement purposes,
this transaction has been treated as a reverse merger, whereby Whitco LP is
considered the acquiring company.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Our condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, which require us
to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amount of assets,
liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related disclosures. A summary of
those significant accounting policies can be found in our Notes to the
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report. The estimates used by
management are based upon their historical experiences combined with
management's understanding of current facts and circumstances. Certain of our
accounting policies are considered critical as they are both important to the
portrayal of our financial condition and the results of our operations and
require significant judgments on the part of management. Management believes the
following represent the critical accounting policies of Whitco as described in
Financial Reporting Release No. 60, "Cautionary Advice Regarding Disclosure
About Critical Accounting Policies," which was issued by the Securities and
Exchange Commission: inventory, goodwill, allowance for doubtful accounts, and
warranty policy.
27
The Company states inventory at the lower of cost or market, determined under
the first-in, first-out method. We maintain a significant amount of raw material
inventory to serve future order demand of customers. While management believes
its processes for ordering and controlling inventory are adequate, changes in
economic or industry conditions may require us to hold inventory longer than
expected or write outdated inventory off as the result of obsolescence.
During fiscal 2001, we amortized goodwill using a fifteen-year life. Beginning
January 1, 2002, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142
(SFAS 142) "Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets," and as a result ceased
amortizing goodwill. We test goodwill for impairment annually or on an interim
basis if an event or circumstance occurs between the annual tests that may
indicate impairment of goodwill. Impairment of goodwill will be recognized in
operating results in the period it is identified.
We utilize our best estimate for allowance for doubtful accounts based on past
history and accruing the expense as a percentage of sales. We grant credit to
distributors of sports and area lighting poles located throughout the United
States of America. Collateral is generally not required for trade receivables.
While we consider our process to be adequate to effectively quantify its
exposure to doubtful accounts, changes in economic, industry or specific
customer conditions may require an adjustment of the allowance for doubtful
accounts.
Our customers receive a one year product warranty for defects in material and
workmanship, providing repair or replacement or refund of the purchase price. We
provide an accrual as a reserve for potential warranty costs based on historical
experience and accruing as a percentage of sales. While management considers our
process to be adequate to effectively quantify its exposure to warranty claims
based on historical performance, changes in warranty claims on a specific or
cumulative basis may require us to adjust its reserve for potential warranty
costs.
Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements - None
Year ended September 30, 2004 compared to the year ended September 30, 2003
We are now at a critical inflection point in our business development. First, we
are poised to benefit from the investments we have made in our organic business.
Secondly, we now have publicly traded stock, which we hope to use to partially
fund a series of acquisitions in order to realize our final primary strategic
objective. Because of the significant investments we have made in our
distribution network, we believe we can now leverage that network by acquiring
small niche-technology fixture and accessory businesses and introducing those
products into our existing distribution channel. This would be expected to
benefit the Company immediately in two ways. First, we will be able to increase
sales of new products by virtue of the fact that we believe our distribution
network appears to be better developed (both in scale as well as technology)
than the ones used by the companies we seek to acquire. Secondly, the added
product offerings may help us gain additional consideration with our lighting
agency and OEM customers. We believe having specialty products on our Web site
and catalogue not only differentiates us from competitors, but also increases
the likelihood that customers will place additional orders for more commodity
product at the time of purchase of the specialty product.
28
We have been reviewing business acquisition and alliance opportunities, which is
intended to be our primary vehicle for creating long-term growth for investors.
Our "opportunistic" growth strategy is targeted to specific candidates in the
outdoor lighting (primarily fixtures and accessories) or pole structure
industry. More specifically, we intend to focus initially on small, privately
owned companies in the $1 million to $15 million revenue range with positive
earnings on a stand alone basis or with the ability to be positive immediately
after acquisition through operating efficiencies. In all cases, we anticipate
these acquisitions will be accretive to earnings immediately. As a rule of
thumb, we expect we will be able to purchase businesses at multiples of 3x to 6x
EBITDA. Without significant incremental expenditure, it is anticipated that
annual revenue of the target companies can be increased in the near future by
introducing the new products into our existing distribution channels.
We have benefited from having our own manufacturing facility, as we were
recently awarded a contract for the production of straight square steel poles
for distribution through one of the top five OEM lighting fixture manufacturers
in the country. The contract, although currently valued at less than $1 million
per year in revenue, could become more lucrative for additional pole business,
as the OEM considers outsourcing more of its pole production.
Over the past four years, management has invested heavily in the first three
initiatives and also incurred significant expenses by going public. The Company
grew revenues by 30% and 14% in fiscal years 2002 and 2003, respectively,
compared to increases of 6% and 8% by Valmont Industries, the industry leader in
outdoor lighting poles. For the year ended September 30, 2004, the Company grew
revenues by 4 %, compared to the year ended September 30, 2003. With adequate
working capital, the Company believes it has the strategy in place to exact
future market share gains.
Our strategy has been further enhanced by the commitment of approximately $2
million restricted cash investment by Laurus Master Fund Ltd. to finance
mergers, joint ventures or other strategic business alliances as the need
arises. This investment not only has provided a restricted cash investment of
approximately $2 million, but also provided an additional $3 million revolving
line of credit at a floor rate of 6%.
The table below was adjusted for pro forma taxes, for periods before the twelve
months ending September 30, 2003, as if Whitco, the fully owned subsidiary of
Catalyst Lighting Group, Inc., was a C-corporation for state and federal tax
purposes.
29
12 Months 12 Months
Ended Ended
9/30/2004 9/30/2003
Sales $ 16,358,303 $ 15,758,570
----------------------------------------------------------
Cost of Sales $ 11,695,063 $ 10,834,944
----------------------------------------------------------
Gross margin on Sales $ 4,663,240 $ 4,923,626
----------------------------------------------------------
General Selling and
Administrative Expenses $ 5,895,194 $ 4,934,542
----------------------------------------------------------
Loss from Operations $ (1,231,954) $ (10,916)
----------------------------------------------------------
Reverse Merger Expense $ -- $ 606,621
----------------------------------------------------------
Interest Expense $ 361,719 $ 326,844
----------------------------------------------------------
Loss Before Taxes and
Pro Forma Income Taxes $ (1,593,673) $ (944,381)
----------------------------------------------------------
Provision for (Benift From)
Taxes $ (61,134) $ 61,134
Loss Before Pro Forma
Taxes $ (1,532,539) $ (1,005,515)
Pro Forma Income Taxes $ -- $ (214,000)
----------------------------------------------------------
Pro Forma Net Loss $ (1,532,539) $ (791,515)
----------------------------------------------------------
Revenue. For the twelve months ended September 30, 2004, the recognized revenue
was $16,358,303. For the twelve months ended September 30, 2003, the recognized
revenue was $15,758,571. Cost of goods sold in the twelve months ended September
30, 2004 was $11,695,063, which generated a gross margin of 28.5%, versus 31.2%
for the twelve months ended September 30, 2003. Excluding commissions from sales
(See table below), the increase in revenue can be attributed to an $820,059
(15.9%) increase in steel area lighting poles, and a $441,213 (64.3%) increase
in aluminum sales. These increases were partially offset by a $446,425 (23.7%)
decrease in sales to an OEM customer, a $147,267 (21.2%) decrease in highmast
lighting pole sales, and a $265,539 (6.4%) decrease in sports lighting pole
sales.
Our agents have the ability to sell our products at or above the base price of
our products, and our commission structure pays agents 100% of the overage above
30
our base price. The table below itemizes commission revenue generated from the
100% overage and revenue generated from our base price.
For the 12 Months Ended September 30,
2004 2003
------------ -------------
Base Price Revenue 13,490,210 13,200,725
Commission Revenue 2,868,092 2,557,846
------------ -------------
Gross Sales 16,358,302 15,758,571
============ =============
General, selling, and administrative expense (GSA expenses). For the twelve
months ended September 30, 2004, GSA expense totaled $5,895,194, compared to
$4,934,542 for the twelve months ended September 30, 2003. The increase in GSA
expense resulted from the increase in commission expenses paid, Salaries, wages,
and labor related expenses, bad debt expense, warranty expense, bank charges,
investment advisor expenses, and investor relations expense as described below.
Commission expense. For the twelve months ended September 30, 2004, commission
expense totaled $2,868,092, compared to $2,557,846 for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2003. The increase in commissions is the result of an increase in
total revenues as compared to the previous comparative period.
Salaries, wages, and labor related. For the twelve months ended September 30,
2004, salaries, wages, and labor related expenses totaled $1,428,614, compared
to $1,328,666 for the twelve months ended September 30, 2003. The increase in
salaries and wages can be attributed to additional personnel hired during the
third and fourth quarter of fiscal year 2003. The expenses associated with the
additional personnel had a more significant impact on fiscal year 2004 as the
Company incurred a full year of salary, wages, and benefits.
Bad debt expense. For the twelve months ended September 30, 2004, bad debt
expense totaled $87,189, compared to $606 for the twelve months ended September
30, 2004. The increase in bad debt expense is the result of an increase in total
revenues as compared to the previous comparative period and an increase in
actual uncollectible accounts during the period.
Warranty expense. For the twelve months ended September 30, 2004, warranty
expense totaled $136,272, compared to $85,395 for the twelve months ended
September 30, 2004. The increase in warranty expense is the result of an
increase in total revenues as compared to the previous comparative period, an
increase in actual warranty work related to defective product produced by an
outsourced manufacturer, and approximately $25,000 in field work for an
individual job to correct a shipping error.
31
Bank Charges. For the twelve months ended September 30, 2004, bank charges
totaled $226,166, compared with $27,856 for the twelve months ended September
30, 2003. The increases in bank charges for the comparative periods reflects
charges associated with loan financing fees and the early termination of one of
our loan agreements.
Investment advisor expenses. For the twelve months ended September 30, 2004,
investment advisor expenses totaled $199,500, compared with $0 for the twelve
months ended September 30, 2003. Keating Investments was the investment advisor
for the reverse merger and received an investment banking fee in common stock of
70,000, which was due upon the Company's common stock trading on the
Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board. The stock began trading on June 26, 2004.
Investor relations expense. For the twelve months ended September 30, 2004,
investor relations expense totaled $95,126, compared with $254 for the twelve
months ended September 30, 2003. The increases in investor relations expense for
the comparative periods are related to the registered offering and the
transition to a publicly traded company.
Interest expense. Interest expense for the twelve months ended September 30,
2004 was $361,719, compared with $326,844 for the twelve months ended September
30, 2003. The increase in interest expense for the comparative periods reflect
the increase in both the operating credit line as well as an increase in
interest rate associated with the factoring agreement between the Company and
Marquette Commercial Finance.
Other expense. For the twelve months ended September 30, 2004 Catalyst Lighting
Group incurred $0 in expense associated with the merger compared to $606,621 for
the twelve months ended September 30, 2003. The Company recognized a $17,768
loss for disposal of fixed assets during the twelve months ended September 30,
2003.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
At September 30, 2004, Catalyst Lighting Group's working capital deficit was
$2,440,188, which represented a decrease in working capital of $1,566,538 over
September 30, 2003. Working capital account changes include an increase in cash
from $96,591 at September 30, 2003 to $501,429 at September 30, 2004, an
increase in inventory from $1,311,130 at September 30, 2003 to $1,739,803 at
September 30, 2004, an increase in revolving note payable from $2,072,522 at
September 30, 2003 to $2,570,457 at September 30, 2004, and a decrease in
accrued liabilities from $806,936 at September 30, 2003 to $649,966 at September
30, 2004. Other account changes include a decrease accounts receivable of
$796,272, a decrease in deferred tax asset of $47,699, an increase in accounts
payable of $383,757, an increase current maturities of long-term debt of
$838,155, and an increase in pre-paid expenses of $6,799. The increase in
payables and inventory was partially attributed to increased raw material cost
for delivery of product in 2004. The changes in accrued liabilities and pre-paid
expenses are related to normal timing of the different category of accounts
through this year. The decrease in working capital is primarily the result of
the $1,532,539 loss for the year ended September 30, 2004.
32
The Company is also seeking to increase both cash flow and profitability by
growing sales internally as well as through acquisitions. If the Company does
not raise additional equity capital sufficient to provide for positive working
capital and is unable to return in the near term to profitability, it may be
required to curtail future operations and/or liquidate assets or enter into
credit arrangements on less than favorable terms than would normally be
expected, to provide for future liquidity.
Cash used in operations for the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 was
($594,014) and ($897,521), respectively. The cash used by operations for the
twelve months ended September 30, 2004 resulted primarily from a loss of
$1,532,539 and an increase in inventories of $428,674. This was partially offset
by a decrease in trade receivables of $796,271, an increase in accounts payable
of $383,759, and common stock issued for services of $311,169.
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities for years ended September 30,
2004 and 2003, was ($2,013,690) and $16,260, respectively. This was primarily a
result of the addition of $1,927,990 of restricted cash for the period ending
September 30, 2004 and the purchases of property and equipment for both periods.
Cash provided by financing activities for the years ended September 30, 2004 and
2003 was $3,012,544 and $977,852, respectively. For the twelve months ended
September 30, 2004 there was an increase in revolving notes payable of $259,091,
proceeds from issuance of long-term debt of $1,928,000, proceeds from long-term
revolving payable of $408,887, and common stock issuance of $567,849. Payments
on notes payable were ($151,283). For the twelve months ended September 30, 2003
there was an increase in revolving notes payable of $985,497 and payments on
notes payable of $7,645.
Material cash requirements for the next twelve months not in the ordinary course
of business relate to the securities offering described herein. Regarding
repayment of debt, over the next 12 months Whitco's current maturities of long
term debt as of September 30, 2004 is $1,362,289, consisting of subordinated
debt. For the next 12 months, one $250,000 payment is due on January 6, 2004,
one $142,850 was due on June 30, 2004, one $217,850 payment is due on June 30,
2005, and one $700,000 payment is due on July 31, 2005, while the rest is spread
evenly over the entire year. Whitco and the Company intend to fund future
payments on these obligations through operational cash flow, further utilization
of its existing credit facility, and adding additional sub-debt. The Company is
also pursuing additional equity through a private placement offering of units,
each units consisting of one share of common stock and one five year warrant to
purchase one share of common stock for $3.00.
On September 30, 2004, the company entered into a financing arrangement with an
entity (the "entity") which included (1) a Secured Convertible Term Note in the
principal amount of two million dollars ($2,000,000), (the "Term Note") and (2)
a Secured Revolving Note (the "Revolving Note") and a Secured Convertible
Minimum Borrowing Note (together with the Revolving Note, the "AR Notes") in the
aggregate principal amount of up to three million dollars ($3,000,000).
33
Subsequent Events:
------------------
On December 3, 2004, the terms of the Notes with Laurus were amended such that
Catalyst received an advance on $600,000 of the funds agreed to be advanced
pursuant to the Notes in exchange for lowering the fixed conversion price of the
Notes from $2.66 per share to $1.50 per share. Additionally, Laurus also
acquired an additional Common Stock Purchase Warrant for the purchase of up to
100,000 shares of Common Stock, exercisable until December 3, 2009 at a price of
$3.00 per share.
On October 12, 2004, the Company commenced a private placement offering of up to
2,666,667 units at $1.50 per unit, each unit consisting of one share of Catalyst
common stock and one five year warrant to purchase Catalyst common stock at an
exercise price of $3.00 per share. This offering was extended through January
24, 2005. To date, we have sold $50,000 worth of units. The 33,333 shares of
common stock issued and the 33,333 shares of common stock underlying the
warrants issued, as well as the 3,333 shares of common stock underlying the
warrant issued to the placement agent, are all being registered hereunder.
The Company intends to utilize any proceeds of the private placement to fund the
retirement of a significant portion of its subordinated debt, to finance the
growth of the Company's business expansion, including by way of acquisitions,
fund product development and general working capital. In connection with the
private placement, the Company has agreed, subject to certain terms and
conditions, to file a registration statement under the Securities Act covering
the resale of all Company common stock sold in the offering, as well as all
common stock issuable to any placement agents utilized in connection with the
offering.
The Units are expected to be issued to accredited investors under an exemption
from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, and any purchasers
would be prohibited from offering or selling the securities purchased in the
offering in the absence of an effective registration statement or an applicable
exemption from registration requirements.
The Company has engaged Keating Securities, LLC and the Seidler Companies, Inc
as placement agents to assist with the offering and may receive up to a 10% cash
placement fee, a 3% expense allowance of securities placed by such broker dealer
in the Offering and five-year common stock purchase warrants entitling such
placement agents to purchase up to 10% of the securities sold by such placement
agent in the Offering, at an exercise price of $1.50 per share. The placement
agents will also act as warrant agents on transactions involving the exercise of
the warrants and, as such, will be paid a commission, which is not included in
the above calculation, equal to 10% of the aggregate proceeds raised from the
exercise of such warrants, as and when proceeds are received by the Company.
Item 7. Financial Statements
The financial statements that constitute Item 7 follow the text of this report.
An index to the financial statements appears in Item 13(a) of this report.
34
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
None.
Item 8A. Controls and Procedures
The Company maintains a system of disclosure controls and procedures that are
designed for the purposes of ensuring that information required to be disclosed
in our SEC reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in the SEC rules and forms, and that such information is
accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive
Officer as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Dennis H. Depenbusch, who serves as the Company's Chairman, Chief Executive
Officer and Secretary, after evaluating the effectiveness of the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(c) as
of September 30, 2004 (the "Evaluation Date") concluded that as of the
Evaluation Date, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were adequate
and effective to ensure that material information relating to the Company and
its consolidated subsidiaries would be made known to them by individuals within
those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report was
being prepared and that information required to be disclosed in our SEC reports
is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in the SEC's rules and forms. There were no significant changes in the
Company's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect
the Company's disclosure controls and procedures subsequent to the Evaluation
Date, nor any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses in such disclosure
controls and procedures requiring corrective actions. As a result, no corrective
actions were taken.
Part III
Item 9. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance
with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
The information set forth under the heading "Election of Directors" of the
definitive proxy statement for our fiscal 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is
incorporated by reference in this Form 10-KSB Annual Report.
Item 10. Executive Compensation
The information set forth under the heading "Summary Compensation Table," of the
definitive proxy statement for our fiscal 2005 Annual Meeting of Stockholders is
incorporated by reference in this Form 10-KSB Annual Report.
Code of Ethics
--------------
35
The Company has not adopted a Code of Ethics for the Board and the salaried
employees.
Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The information set forth under the heading "Beneficial Ownership of Common
Stock by Certain Stockholders and Management" and "Incentive Stock Option Plan"
of the definitive proxy statement for our fiscal 2005 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-KSB Annual Report.
Item 12. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The information set forth under the heading "Long Term Debt" and "Other Related
Party Transactions" of the definitive proxy statement for our fiscal 2005 Annual
Meeting of Stockholders is incorporated by reference in this Form 10-KSB Annual
Report.
36
Item 13. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits.
Exhibit
Number Description
Financial Statements - December 31, 2002
Index...................................................F-1
Report of Independent Registered Accounting Firm........F-2
Balance Sheet...........................................F-4
Statement of Operations.................................F-5
Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity............F-6
Statements of Cash Flows................................F-7
Notes to Financial Statements...........................F-8
* 2.1 Securities Exchange Agreement dated February 12, 2003 by and
among Wentworth III, Inc., Whitco Company, L.L.P. and the
partners of Whitco
** 3.1 Certificate of Incorporation
** 3.2 By-Laws
# 3.3 Certificate of Incorporation of Catalyst Lighting Group, Inc.
# 3.4 Certificate of Ownership and Merger of Catalyst Lighting
Group, Inc. into Wentworth III, Inc.
***10.1 Escrow Agreement
10.2 Lease by and between the Company and BMF, LLC
31.1 Certification of the Company's Principal Executive Officer
and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Securities and Exchange
Commission Release 34-46427
32.1 Certification of the Company's Principal Executive Officer
and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
37
* Incorporated herein by reference to exhibit 2.1 of the Company's Form 8-K,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 15, 2003.
** Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits of the Company's
Registration Statement on Form SB-2, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 12, 2001.
*** Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.6 of the Company's Amendment
No. 3 to its Registration Statement on Form SB-2/A, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on July 22, 2002.
# Incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Form 10-KSB filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29, 2003
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
Form 8-K filed April 19, 2004 announcing publication of the first
installment of its new quarterly newsletter.
Form 8-K filed October 5, 2004 with respect to the sale to Laurus Master
Fund, Ltd. of a Secured Convertible Term Note in the principal amount of two
million dollars ($2,000,000) and a Secured Revolving Note and a Secured
Convertible Minimum Borrowing Note in the aggregate principal amount of up to
three million dollars ($3,000,000), all of which are convertible into our common
stock at an initial fixed conversion price of $2.66 per share.
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
General. Hein & Associates LLP, CPAs ("Hein") is the Company's principal
auditing accountant firm. The Company's Board of Directors has considered
whether the provision of audit services is compatible with maintaining Hein's
independence.
AUDIT FEES
The aggregate fees billed by Hein & Associates LLP for professional services
rendered for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of
financial statements included in our Form 10-KSB's or services that are normally
provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings were $59,007.00 for
fiscal year 2004 and $42,803.00 for fiscal year 2003.
The aggregate fees billed by Hein & Associates LLP for professional services
rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning were $12,753.00 for
fiscal year 2004 and $1,000.00 for fiscal year 2003.
ALL OTHER FEES
38
In fiscal 2004 and 2003, Hein & Associates LLP fees billed for other services
were $0.
All audit work was performed by the auditors' full time employees.
39
SIGNATURES
In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, in the City of Fort Worth, Texas, on this 17th day of December,
2004.
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC.
By: /s/ Dennis H. Depenbusch
------------------------------------
Dennis H. Depenbusch
Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and
Chairman of the Board of Directors
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been
signed by the following members of the Board of Directors on behalf of the
Registrant and on this 17th day of December 2004:
/s/ Henry Glover
-------------------------------------
Henry Glover, President and Director
/s/ Kevin R. Keating
-------------------------------------
Kevin R. Keating, Director
/s/ Mary Titus
-------------------------------------
Mary Titus, Director
/s/ Tracy B. Taylor
-------------------------------------
Tracy B. Taylor, Director
40
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.......................42
Consolidated Balance Sheet - as of September 30, 2004.........................43
Consolidated Statements of Operations - For the Years Ended September 30,
2004 and 2003.................................................................44
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity - For the Years
Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003.............................................45
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - For the Years Ended September 30,
2004 and 2003.................................................................46
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements....................................47
41
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders
Catalyst Lighting Group, Inc.
Ft. Worth, Texas
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Catalyst Lighting
Group, Inc. and Subsidiary as of September 30, 2004, and the related
consolidated statements of operations, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for
the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. These consolidated financial
statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of
Catalyst Lighting Group, Inc. and Subsidiary as of September 30, 2004 and 2003
and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended
September 30, 2004 and 2003 in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America.
HEIN & ASSOCIATES LLP
Denver, Colorado
November 5, 2004
42
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
As of September 30, 2004
SEPTEMBER 30,
2004
--------------
ASSETS
------
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash $ 501,429
Trade receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $42,822 2,676,504
Inventories, net of reserve of $18,343 1,739,803
Prepaid expenses and other 56,301
--------------
Total current assets 4,974,037
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, net of accumulated depreciation of $95,653 163,138
OTHER ASSETS:
Goodwill 2,971,362
Restricted cash 1,927,990
Deferred financing cost 401,306
Other 15,793
--------------
Total other assets 5,316,451
--------------
TOTAL ASSETS $ 10,453,626
==============
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
------------------------------------
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Revolving note payable $ 2,570,457
Current maturities of long-term debt:
Related party 250,000
Other 1,112,289
Accounts payable 2,831,513
Accrued commissions 314,879
Other accrued liabilities 335,087
--------------
Total current liabilities 7,414,225
--------------
LONG-TERM DEBT, less current maturities:
Related party 50,000
Other 1,863,639
--------------
Total long-term debt 1,913,639
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 8)
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Preferred stock - $.01 par value; authorized 10,000,000 shares, none issued -
Common stock - $.01 par value; authorized 40,000,000 shares,
3,756,051 and 3,391,368 shares issued and outstanding, respectively 37,561
Additional paid-in capital 3,143,757
Accumulated deficit (2,055,556)
--------------
Total stockholders' equity 1,125,762
--------------
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY $ 10,453,626
==============
See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements
43
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003
FOR THE YEARS ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30,
----------------------------
2004 2003
------------ ------------
NET SALES $ 16,358,303 $ 15,758,570
COST OF SALES 11,695,063 10,834,944
------------ ------------
GROSS PROFIT ON SALES 4,663,240 4,923,626
GENERAL, SELLING AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES:
General, selling and administrative expenses 5,895,194 4,795,679
Research and development -- 138,863
------------ ------------
Total general, selling and
administrative expenses 5,895,194 4,934,542
------------ ------------
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS (1,231,954) (10,916)
OTHER EXPENSE:
Reverse merger costs -- 606,621
Interest expense 361,719 326,844
------------ ------------
LOSS BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES (1,593,673) (944,381)
PROVISION FOR (BENEFIT FROM) INCOME TAXES (61,134) 61,134
------------ ------------
NET LOSS $ (1,532,539) $ (1,005,515)
PRO FORMA INCOME TAX AND NET LOSS:
Net loss before pro forma income taxes $ (1,532,539) $ (1,005,515)
Pro forma income tax expense (benefit)
(unaudited) -- (214,000)
------------ ------------
PRO FORMA NET LOSS (unaudited) $ (1,532,539) $ (791,515)
============ ============
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE:
Basic $ (.43) $ (.34)
============ ============
Diluted $ (.43) $ (.34)
============ ============
PRO FORMA NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
(UNAUDITED):
Basic $ (.43) $ (.27)
============ ============
Diluted $ (.43) $ (.27)
============ ============
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING:
Basic $ 3,523,309 $ 2,971,242
============ ============
Diluted $ 3,523,309 $ 2,971,242
============ ============
See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements
44
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
For the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003
COMMON STOCK ADDITIONAL
------------------------ PAID-IN ACCUMULATED STOCK-HOLDERS
SHARES AMOUNT CAPITAL DEFICIT EQUITY
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
BALANCE, October 1, 2002 2,800,995 $ 28,010 $ 626,990 $ 482,498 $ 1,137,498
Issuance of shares in reverse merger 200,000 2,000 (1,200) -- 800
Common stock issued for services 200,000 2,000 386,000 -- 388,000
Retirement of long term debt by conversion to
equity interest 190,373 1,904 373,096 -- 375,000
Warrants issued as consideration for debt -- -- 70,098 -- 70,098
Net loss -- -- -- (1,005,515) (1,005,515)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
BALANCE, September 30, 2003 3,391,368 $ 33,914 $ 1,454,984 $ (523,017) $ 965,881
Common stock issued, net of offering cost of
$ 70,904 255,501 2,555 565,293 -- 567,848
Common stock issued for services 109,182 1,092 310,077 -- 311,169
Warrants and beneficial conversion feature in
association with debt -- -- 813,403 -- 813,403
Net loss -- -- -- (1,532,539) (1,532,539)
----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -----------
BALANCE, September 30, 2004 3,756,051 $ 37,561 $ 3,143,757 $(2,055,556) $ 1,125,762
=========== =========== =========== =========== ===========
See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements
45
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003
YEAR ENDED YEAR ENDED
SEPTEMBER 30, SEPTEMBER 30,
2004 2003
----------- -----------
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss $(1,532,539) $(1,005,515)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
used in operating activities:
Amortization of debt discount 35,449 35,449
Provision for doubtful accounts 87,189 --
Loss on sale of property and equipment -- 17,768
Depreciation and amortization 37,759 29,648
Common stock issuance for services 311,169 388,000
Deferred Taxes (61,134) 61,134
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables, related and other 709,082 (1,192,666)
Inventories (428,674) (459,097)
Prepaid expenses and other 20,894 (29,473)
Other assets -- 2,018
Accounts payable 383,759 1,151,820
Other accrued liabilities (156,968) 103,393
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (594,014) (897,521)
----------- -----------
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Cash assumed in acquisition -- 45,000
Purchase of property and equipment (85,700) (28,740)
Restricted cash (1,927,990) --
----------- -----------
Net cash used in investing activities (2,013,690) 16,260
----------- -----------
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Net increase (decrease) in due on demand revolving 259,091 985,497
note payable
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt 1,928,000 --
Proceeds from long-term revolving payable 408,887 --
Payments on notes payable (151,283) (7,645)
Common stock issuance 567,849 --
----------- -----------
Net cash provided by financing activities 3,012,544 977,852
----------- -----------
NET CHANGE IN CASH 404,839 96,591
CASH, at beginning of period 96,591 --
----------- -----------
CASH, at end of period $ 501,430 $ 96,591
=========== ===========
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the year for interest $ 298,071 $ 326,020
=========== ===========
SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Conversion of long-term debt to equity interest $ -- $ 375,000
=========== ===========
Issuance of common stock for acquisition $ -- $ 800
=========== ===========
Warrants issued in association with debt $ 813,403 $ --
=========== ===========
Payoff of revolving note payable through issuance of debt $ 3,930,427 $ --
=========== ===========
See accompanying notes to these consolidated financial statements
46
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES:
-------------------------------
Nature of Operations - Catalyst Lighting Group, Inc., located in Fort
Worth, Texas, sells sports and area lighting poles to distributors
throughout the United States of America. See Note 2 for a description of a
merger between Catalyst Lighting Group, Inc. and Whitco Company, LLP
(Whitco LLP) during fiscal 2003. (Whitco LLP, prior to the merger with
Catalyst Lighting Group, Inc. in August 2003 and Catalyst Lighting Group,
Inc. after the merger are referred to herein as the Company.)
Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include
the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary Whitco Company,
L.P. ("Whitco"). All significant intercompany accounts and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.
Liquidity and Basis of Presentation - At September 30, 2004, working
capital deficit was $2,440,188. The Company also incurred a net loss for
fiscal 2004 of $1,532,539.
On September 30, 2004, the Company entered into a financing arrangement
with an entity (the "entity") which included (1) a Secured Convertible Term
Note in the principal amount of two million dollars ($2,000,000), (the
"Term Note") and (2) a Secured Revolving Note (the "Revolving Note") and a
Secured Convertible Minimum Borrowing Note (together with the Revolving
Note, the "AR Notes") in the aggregate principal amount of up to three
million dollars ($3,000,000). See Note 4 for terms.
The Company also sought additional equity through a private placement
offering of units at $1.50 per unit, each unit consisting of one share of
common stock and one five year warrant to purchase one share of common
stock for $3.00; however, no funds were raised in such offering. See
"Subsequent Events" below. The Company is also seeking to increase both
cash flow and profitability by growing sales internally as well as through
acquisitions. If the Company does not raise additional equity capital
sufficient to provide for positive working capital and is unable to return
in the near term to profitability, it may be required to curtail future
operations and/or liquidate assets or enter into credit arrangements on
less than favorable terms than would normally be expected, to provide for
future liquidity.
Inventories - Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market,
determined under the first-in, first-out method.
Cost of Sales - Cost of sales consists of the actual cost of purchased
parts, manufacturing labor and overhead, related in-bound shipping charges
and out-bound freight costs.
Property and Equipment - Property and equipment are stated at cost.
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment is provided using
the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives of 5 to
7 years.
Depreciation expense for the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 was
$37,759 and $29,650, respectively. Maintenance, repairs and renewals which
47
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
neither materially add to the value of property and equipment nor
appreciably prolong its life are charged to operations as incurred. Gains
or losses on disposals of property and equipment are included in income.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets - Management of the Company assesses
impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable. If the net
carrying value exceeds the net cash flows, then impairment will be
recognized to reduce the carrying value to the estimated fair value.
Goodwill - Beginning January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (SFAS 142) "Goodwill and Other
Intangible Assets," and as a result ceased amortizing goodwill. The Company
tests goodwill for impairment annually (in the fourth quarter) or on an
interim basis if an event or circumstance occurs between the annual tests
that may indicate impairment of goodwill. Impairment of goodwill will be
recognized in operating results in the period it is identified.
The Company completed the goodwill impairment test required by SFAS 142 as
of September 30, 2004 and no impairment was identified. In completing this
assessment, the Company compared the estimated fair value to the current
carrying value of goodwill. The fair value was derived using an income
based analysis using an average EBIT (earnings before interest and taxes)
for the three fiscal years preceding 2004 as a more representative measure
of normal earnings power which excludes non-recurring expenses associated
with going public.
Income Taxes - The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with the
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 109, "Accounting for Income
Taxes," which requires the recognition of deferred tax liabilities and
assets at currently enacted tax rates for the expected future tax
consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements
or tax returns. A valuation allowance is recognized to reduce the net
deferred tax asset to an amount that is more likely than not to be
realized. State minimum taxes are expensed as incurred. Prior to the
reverse merger between Catalyst Lighting Group, Inc. (formerly Wentworth
III, Inc.) and Whitco Company, LP (see Note 2), income taxes related to
Whitco Company, LLP were generally the responsibility of the members. The
Company has included unaudited estimated pro forma taxes as if Whitco LLP
was a C-corporation prior to its merger with Wentworth III and the
resulting pro forma net income (loss) in the statements of operations.
Concentrations of Credit Risk - Financial instruments which potentially
subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of
trade receivables. The Company grants credit to distributors of sports and
area lighting poles located throughout the United States of America.
Receivables and Credit Policies - Trade receivables consist of
uncollateralized customer obligations due under normal trade terms
requiring payment within 30 days of the invoice date, with the exception of
certain OEM customers who mandate extended terms. Past due receivables do
not bear interest. Payments on trade receivables are applied to the
48
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
earliest unpaid invoices. Management reviews trade receivables periodically
and reduces the carrying amount by a valuation allowance that reflects
management's best estimate of the amount that may not be collectable.
Use of Estimates - In preparing financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
management is required to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the
reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash - For purposes of the statements of
cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments with a
maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. There were no cash
equivalents at September 30, 2004 and 2003. Restricted cash represents the
proceeds for a debt financing, which are limited to use in an acquisition,
joint venture, or capital transaction (see Note 4).
Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The estimated fair values for
financial instruments are determined at discrete points in time based on
relevant market information. These estimates involve uncertainties and
cannot be determined with precision. The carrying amounts of the accounts
receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate fair value
because of the short-term maturities of these instruments. The carrying
value of the debt approximates fair value due to its issuance at the end of
the fiscal year.
Revenue Recognition - The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with SEC
Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101, Revenue Recognition in Financial
Statements (SAB 101), as amended by SAB 101A and 101B. SAB 101 requires
that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1)
persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred or
services rendered; (3) the fee is fixed and determinable; and (4)
collectibility is reasonably assured. Company product is made to customer
or industry specifications at an agreed upon price as typically specified
in the customer purchase order. Title passes to the customer at the point
of shipment along with all the risks and rewards of ownership. Customers
receive a one-year product warranty for defects in materials and
workmanship providing repair or replacement or refund of purchase price.
The Company provides an accrual as a reserve for potential warranty costs,
which historically have not been significant.
Research and Development - The costs associated with research and
development for new products and significant product improvements are
expensed as incurred. The Company had $0 and $138,863 in research and
development costs for the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003,
respectively, primarily for further development of Whitco's sports
lighting product offering.
Stock-Based Compensation - The Company accounts for stock-based
compensation for employees using the intrinsic value method prescribed in
Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees, and related interpretations. Accordingly, compensation cost for
options granted to employees is measured as the excess, if any, of the
49
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
market price of the Company's common stock at the measurement date
(generally, the date of grant) over the amount an employee must pay to
acquire the common stock.
In October 1995, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued a new
statement titled Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (SFAS No. 123).
SFAS No. 123 requires that options, warrants, and similar instruments
which are granted to non-employees for goods and services be recorded at
fair value on the grant date. Fair value is generally determined under an
option pricing model using the criteria set forth in SFAS No. 123. The
Company did not adopt SFAS No. 123 to account for stock-based compensation
for employees but is subject to the pro forma disclosure requirements.
SFAS No. 123 requires the Company to provide pro forma information
regarding net income as if compensation costs for the Company's option
plans and other awards had been determined in accordance with the fair
value based method prescribed in SFAS No. 123. The Company estimates the
fair value of each award at the grant date by using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:
September September
30, 30,
2004 2003
--------- ---------
Dividend yield 0% 0%
Volatility** 34.47% 0%
Risk free interest rate 4.74% 3.83%
Expected life 10 years 10 years
** Volatility is assumed to be 0% for options issued to
employees prior to the Company going public in a reverse
merger (see Note 2)
The total fair value of options granted was computed to be approximately
$48,300 for the year ended September 30, 2004. These amounts are amortized
ratably over the vesting periods of the options or recognized at the date
of grant if no vesting period is required. Pro forma stock-based
compensation was $21,467 for the year ended September 30, 2004.
If the Company had accounted for its stock-based compensation plans in
accordance with SFAS No. 123, the Company's net loss and net loss per
common share would have been reported as follows:
50
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Year Ended
September 30, 2004
------------------
Net loss, as reported $ (1,532,539)
Stock based compensation included in net income --
Fair value of stock based compensation (21,467)
-------------
Pro forma net loss $ (1,554,006)
=============
Net loss per common share, basic:
As reported $ (0.43)
Stock based compensation included in net income --
Fair value of stock based compensation (0.01)
-------------
Pro forma net loss per common share $ (0.44)
=============
Net loss per common share, diluted:
As reported $ (0.43)
Stock based compensation included in net income --
Fair value of stock based compensation (0.01)
-------------
Pro forma net loss per common share $ (0.44)
=============
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 there was no differences
between net loss and pro forma net loss under the accounting provisions of
SFAS No. 123.
Net Income (Loss) Per Share - Basic earnings per share (EPS) is calculated
by dividing the income or loss available to common shareholders by the
weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period.
Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities
or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into
common stock.
Comprehensive Income (Loss) - Comprehensive income is defined as all
changes in stockholders' equity, exclusive of transactions with owners,
such as capital investments. Comprehensive income includes net income or
loss, changes in certain assets and liabilities that are reported directly
in equity such as translation adjustments on investments in foreign
subsidiaries and unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale
securities. During the periods presented, the Company's comprehensive loss
was the same as its net loss.
2. REVERSE MERGER WITH WHITCO LLP:
-------------------------------
Effective August 27, 2003, Wentworth III merged with Whitco LP, a privately
held Texas-based manufacturer and marketer of steel outdoor lighting pole
structures. Whitco LP (as successor in interest to Whitco Company LLP)
completed the merger to become a publicly reporting entity to pursue
51
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
acquisitions and other strategic opportunities as well as raise capital
from the public markets. Whitco LP's management and board assumed
significant majority control of Wentworth III through a merger structure
whereby Whitco LP became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Wentworth III, Inc.
Subsequent to the merger, Wentworth III changed its name to Catalyst
Lighting Group, Inc. For financial statement purposes, this transaction has
been treated as a reverse merger, whereby Whitco LP is considered the
acquiring company. 200,000 shares of the Company's common stock were
effectively issued to the shareholders of Wentworth III in the merger. The
ownership units of Whitco LP outstanding prior to the merger have been
converted to common stock and treated as outstanding as of the beginning of
the periods presented. The results of operations of Catalyst Lighting
Group, Inc. are included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for
the period from August 28, 2003 to September 30, 2003.
As a result of the reverse merger with a shell company, the value assigned
to the assets and liabilities was their fair value, which approximated its
historical basis. The following table summarizes the values of the tangible
assets and liabilities assumed at August 27, 2003, the date of acquisition:
Cash $ 45,000
Current liabilities (45,000)
-----------
Net assets acquired $ --
===========
Keating Investments, LLC ("KI") is a Colorado state registered investment
advisor and owns 89% of Keating Securities, LLC ("KS"), a registered
broker-dealer. In connection with the reverse merger, KS received an
investment banking fee, part of which has been paid through the issuance of
200,000 shares of the Company's common stock. The son of a shareholder and
director of the Company is the Managing Member of, and holds a 60% interest
in KI. KI has been engaged by and is representing the Company as its
investment banker.
Pro Forma Combined Results of Operations - The following pro forma combined
results of operations for the year ended September 30, 2003 have been
prepared as though the reverse merger with Whitco LLP had occurred as of
the beginning of the periods presented. This pro forma financial
information does not purport to be indicative of the results of operations
that would have been attained had the acquisitions been made as of October
1, 2002 or of results of operations that may occur in the future:
For the Year
Ended
September 30,
2003
(unaudited)
------------
Net sales $ 15,758,571
52
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Net income (loss) before pro forma income tax (1,027,962)
Net income (loss) after pro forma income tax (805,634)
Income (loss) per share (diluted) before pro forma
income tax (0.35)
3. INVENTORIES:
------------
Inventories are comprised of the following:
September 30, September 30,
2004 2003
----------- -----------
Raw materials $ 1,267,100 $ 1,096,952
Work in process 0 238,098
Finished goods 491,046 40,778
----------- -----------
1,758,146 1,375,828
Less reserve (18,343) (64,698)
=========== ===========
$ 1,739,803 $ 1,311,130
=========== ===========
3. NOTE PAYABLE AND LONG-TERM DEBT:
Note payable and long-term debt at year end consists of the following:
September 30,
2004
-------------
Noninterest-bearing note payable to an individual, discounted
at 6.3% (unamortized discount of $13,102 at September 30,
2004), payable in annual installments of $217,851, The Company
is delinquent on $142,851 of a payment that was due on June
30, 2004 (a) $ 347,599
Noninterest-bearing note payable to an individual, discounted
at 6.22% (unamortized discount of $1,688 at September 30,
2004), payable in monthly installments of $7,375 (a) 64,690
Note payable to an entity, principal due July 31, 2005,
interest payable monthly at a fixed rate of 15% (b) 700,000
Subordinated note payable to a former owner of Whitco LLP, due
April 30, 2007, rate 15%, unsecured 150,000
Note payable to an entity related to a stockholder, principal
and 10% interest due on December 31, 2004 (c) 250,000
53
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
September 30,
2004
-------------
Subordinated note payable to a stockholder, due April 30,
2007, rate 15%, unsecured 50,000
Convertible term note to an entity, principal due September
30, 2007, (original and unamortized discount of $286,361 at
September 30, 2004) (d) 1,713,639
Convertible revolving note to an entity, principal due
September 30, 2007, discounted (original and unamortized
discount of $429,543 at September 30, 2004) (d) 2,570,457
-----------
5,846,385
Less current maturities (3,932,746)
-----------
$ 1,913,639
===========
(a) Notes are collateralized by all assets of the Company. The security
interest in inventory and accounts receivable is subordinated to the
revolving bank note and the security interest in all assets is
subordinated to notes marked as (b).
(b) Notes are collateralized by all assets of the Company but are
subordinated to the revolving bank note.
(c) On August 6, 2003, Whitco Company LLP received a bridge loan of
$250,000 from Keating Reverse Merger Fund ("Lender"). In
consideration for the note, the Company agreed to issue warrants for
the purchase of up to 125,000 shares (the "Warrant Shares") of the
common stock of the Company upon consummation of the Merger at a
price of $2.00 per Warrant Share. On August 22, 2004, in
consideration for extending the due date on the note to December 31,
2004, we issued an additional 40,000 warrants for purchase of our
common stock at a price of $4.00 per share. The fair value of the
warrants was estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes
pricing model with the following assumptions: common stock based on
a market price of $2.85 per share, zero dividends, expected
volatility of 34%, risk free interest rate of 3.42% and an expected
life of 5 years. The warrants were valued at $27,693 and recorded as
deferred financing. The agreement carries certain rights to repay
the note early following any capital raised by the company. KI is
the investment advisor and managing member of the Lender.
Additionally, the KI Principal is an investor in the Lender.
(d) On September 30, 2004, the Company entered into a financing
arrangement with an entity (the "Entity") which included (1) a
Secured Convertible Term Note in the principal amount of two million
dollars ($2,000,000), (the "Term Note") and (2) a Secured Revolving
54
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Note (the "Revolving Note") and a Secured Convertible Minimum
Borrowing Note (together with the Revolving Note, the "AR Notes") in
the aggregate principal amount of up to three million dollars
($3,000,000). The Term Note and AR Notes are convertible into the
Company's common stock at an initial fixed conversion price of $2.66
per share. In connection with the Term Note and AR Notes, the
Company issued the entity Common Stock Purchase Warrant for the
purchase of up to 472,000 shares of our common stock, exercisable
until September 30, 2009 at a price of $3.00 per share (the
"Warrant"). On December 3, 2004, the terms of the Term Note and AR
Notes were amended such that Catalyst received an advance on
$600,000 of the funds agreed to be advanced in exchange for lowering
the fixed conversion price of the Term Note and AR Notes from $2.66
per share to $1.50 per share. Additionally, the Entity also acquired
an additional Common Stock Purchase Warrant for the purchase of up
to 100,000 shares of Common Stock, exercisable until December 3,
2009 at a price of $3.00 per share.
The fair value of the warrants issued September 30, 2004 was
estimated on the grant date using the Black-Scholes pricing model
with the following assumptions: common stock based on a market price
of $2.65 per share, zero dividends, expected volatility of 34%, risk
free interest rate of 3.42% and an expected life of 5 years. The
warrants were valued at $396,480 which resulted in a relative fair
value of $367,351 and also resulted in a beneficial conversion
feature of $348,554. The total discount of $715,904 was allocated to
the Term Note and the AR Notes proportionately based on the loan
size and will be amortized over the life of the loans.
The Term Note and AR Notes (collectively, the "Notes") mature on
September 30, 2007 and are collateralized by a first priority lien
on inventory, accounts receivable, raw materials and all of its
ownership interests in Whitco. The Notes accrue interest at a rate
per annum equal to the "prime rate" published in The Wall Street
Journal from time to time, plus two percent (2%), but shall in no
event be less than six percent (6%) per annum. The Company also
granted registration rights with respect to all shares of Common
Stock underlying the Notes and Warrant.
The Term Note was placed into an escrow account solely controlled by
the Entity (the "Escrow Account"). The Company may request that the
Entity release all or any portion of the amounts contained in the
Escrow Account following, or in connection with, the consummation of
an acquisition, joint venture or capital investment (a
"Transaction") by the Company. Such a release is subject to the
Entity's evaluation of all factors it considers, in its sole
discretion, relevant at the time of such requested release. The
Entity is under no obligation to release any amounts and the release
of such amounts is in the Entity's sole and absolute discretion.
Aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt at September 30, 2004, not
including the related discounts, are as follows:
2005 $ 4,377,078
2006 -
55
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
2007 2,200,000
-----------
$ 6,577,078
===========
During the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, the Company had $36,531
and $33,416, respectively, of accrued interest expense on notes due to
related parties.
5. MAJOR CUSTOMERS, MAJOR SALES AGENCIES AND SIGNIFICANT CONCENTRATIONS:
---------------------------------------------------------------------
During the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, one customer accounted
for more than 10% of the Company's sales, totaling 11% and 14%,
respectively. The Company grants lighting agencies the exclusive right to
sell the Company's products in given geographical locations. No individual
lighting agency accounted for more than 10% of the Company's sales for the
fiscal year ended September 30, 2004 and 2003.
During the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, 54% and 70% of the
Company's material and assembly purchases of lighting poles were from two
vendors. Although there are multiple vendors with which the Company could
enter into agreements, the deterioration or cessation of either
relationship could have a material adverse effect, at least temporarily, on
the Company as it attempts to negotiate agreements with other manufactures
of lighting poles. Accounts payable to these two vendors were $710,016 and
$1,060,484 as of September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively.
6. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY:
Equity Transactions - The Company's Certificate of Incorporation authorizes
the issuance of 50,000,000 shares of stock. They are divided into
10,000,000 shares of preferred stock and 40,000,000 shares of common stock.
At September 30, 2004, none of the preferred stock has been issued.
However, such preferred shares may later be issued in such series with
whatever preferences as may be determined by the Board of Directors.
See Notes 2 and 4 for additional equity transactions.
Option Plans - In June 2000, the Company began issuing options for the
purchase of common stock to certain key employees. Due to the reverse
merger with Wentworth III, all options previously reported in units have
been converted into options for the purchase of common stock. Approximately
843,632 options have been issued through September 30, 2003 and there
remains 656,368 options that can be issued under the plan.
Following is a summary of option activity:
56
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Range of Weighted
Employee Exercise Prices Average
Options ----------------- Exercise
Outstanding Low High Price
----------- ----- ----- --------
Balances, October 1, 2002 690,197 $ .30 $ .86 $ .58
Granted 118,435 .86 .86 .86
------- ----- ----- -----
Balances, September 30, 2003 808,632 $ .30 $ .86 $ .62
Granted 35,000 2.50 2.50 2.50
------- ----- ----- -----
Balances, September 30, 2004 843,632 $ .30 $2.50 $ .70
======= ===== ===== =====
Vested options 630,519 $ .30 $2.50 $ .58
======= ===== ===== =====
If not previously exercised, options expire as follows:
Weighted
Average
Year Ending Number of Exercise
September 30, Shares Price
------------- --------- --------
2010 423,836 $ .40
2011 75,386 .86
2012 309,410 .86
2014 35,000 2.50
-------
843,632
=======
All options were granted at exercise prices that approximated market on the
dates of the grant. The weighted average per share fair value of options
granted during fiscal years 2004 and 2003 was $2.50 and $.86.
Stock Purchase Warrants - The Company has granted warrants (see note 4),
which are summarized as follows for the years ended September 30, 2004 and
2003:
57
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Weighted
Average
Warrants Exercise
Outstanding Price
----------- ----------
Balances, October 1, 2002 -- $ --
Granted 125,000 2.00
Exercised -- --
------- -----
Balances, September 30, 2003 125,000 $2.00
Granted 519,100 3.08
Exercised -- --
------- -----
Balances, September 30, 2004 644,100 $2.87
======= =====
7. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS:
---------------------------
During the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, the Company paid $7,200
and $60,800, respectively, for accounting and administrative services to an
entity related through common ownership through May 2002.
During the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, the Company had sales
of $209,805 and $423,760, respectively, to an entity whose principal owner
is the brother of an employee of the Company. Accounts receivable from this
related entity were $0 and $92,305 at September 30, 2004 and 2003.
See Notes 2, 4 and 10 for other related party transactions.
8. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES:
------------------------------
The Company leases a facility and equipment under operating leases expiring
at various dates through fiscal year ended September 30, 2009.
The future minimum payments required under these operating leases are as
follows:
58
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Year Ending
September 30,
-------------
2005 $ 139,178
2006 136,958
2007 136,958
2008 136,764
2009 21,964
----------
$ 571,822
==========
Rent expense for the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 was $103,090
and $46,882, respectively.
During the year ended September 30, 2004, there were three legal
proceedings to which we became a party or to which any of our assets or
properties were subject. The Company does not believe the result of these
proceedings will have a material impact on our financial statements.
9. INCOME TAXES:
-------------
The Company has a net operating loss carryforward of approximately
$1,800,000 available to offset taxable income with portions beginning to
expire in 2021. A portion of the net operating loss may be subject to
Section 382 limitations.
The components of the net deferred tax assets and liabilities as of
September 30, 2004 are as follows:
Deferred tax assets (liabilities):
Current -
Allowance for bad debts $ 16,000
Inventory reserve 7,000
Warranty reserve 8,000
Section 263A 8,000
Accrued Commissions 29,000
Non-current -
Net operating loss carryforwards 647,000
Property and equipment (30,000)
Goodwill and intangibles (156,000)
-----------
Net deferred tax assets 529,000
Less valuation allowance (529,000)
-----------
59
CATALYST LIGHTING GROUP, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Net deferred tax assets $ -
===========
During the fourth quarter, the Company decided that it was more probable
than not that the net deferred tax assets will not be realized in the
future and recorded the valuation allowance. Thus, the valuation allowance
increased from $0 at September 30, 2003 to $529,000 at September 30, 2004.
The difference between income taxes and the provision for income taxes for
the years ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 relates to the following:
2004 2003
--------- ---------
Benefit provision at federal statutory rate $(542,000) $(321,000)
State income tax benefit, net of Federal
income tax benefit
(49,000) (30,000)
Non-deductible legal fees associated with -- 185,000
merger
Tax effects of Whitco LLP losses prior to -- 161,000
merger
Other 1,000 66,134
Valuation allowance 529,000 -
--------- ---------
$ (61,000) $ 61,134
========= =========
10. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS:
------------------
On December 3, 2004, the terms of the Notes with Laurus were amended such that
Catalyst received an advance on $600,000 of the funds agreed to be advanced
pursuant to the Notes in exchange for lowering the fixed conversion price of the
Notes from $2.66 per share to $1.50 per share. Additionally, Laurus also
acquired an additional Common Stock Purchase Warrant for the purchase of up to
100,000 shares of Common Stock, exercisable until December 3, 2009 at a price of
$3.00 per share.
On October 12, 2004, the Company commenced a private placement offering of up to
2,666,667 units at $1.50 per unit, each unit consisting of one share of Catalyst
common stock and one five year warrant to purchase Catalyst common stock at an
exercise price of $3.00 per share. This offering was extended through January
24, 2005. To date, we have sold $50,000 worth of units. The 33,333 shares of
common stock issued and the 33,333 shares of common stock underlying the
warrants issued, as well as the 3,333 shares of common stock underlying the
warrant issued to the placement agent, are all being registered hereunder.
60