Edgar Filing: Wilhelmina International, Inc.

f10q_111413.htm

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[x]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013

[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________ to ________

Commission File Number 0-28536

WILHELMINA INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	74-2781950
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

200 Crescent Court, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas	75201
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(214) 661-7488

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

n/a

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [x] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). [x] Yes [ ] No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

	Large accelerated filer [ ]	Accelerated filer [ ]
	Non-accelerated filer [ ]	Smaller reporting company [x]
	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes [x] No

As of November 12, 2013 the registrant had 117,813,925 shares of common stock outstanding.

WILHELMINA INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013

PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION		1

	Item 1.	Financial Statements	1

		Consolidated Balance Sheets – September 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012	1

		Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations - for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012	2

		Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012	3

		Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements	4

	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	8

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	15

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	15

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION		15

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	15

	Item 1.A.	Risk Factors	16

	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	16

	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	16

	Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	16

	Item 5.	Other Information	16

	Item 6.	Exhibits	17

SIGNATURES			18

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

WILHELMINA INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share data)

	(Unaudited)
	September 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,729		$	1,145
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $760 and $760		12,323			9,904
Indemnification receivable		-			428
Deferred tax asset		202			202
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		295			207
Total current assets		14,549			11,886

Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $459 and $353		792			554

Trademarks and trade names with indefinite lives		8,467			8,467
Other intangibles with finite lives, net of accumulated amortization of $7,527 and $6,456		810			1,881
Goodwill		12,563			12,563
Restricted cash		222			222
Other assets		328			305

Total assets	$	37,731		$	35,878

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	3,634		$	2,607
Due to models		8,359			7,057
Foreign withholding claim subject to indemnification		-			428
Earn out liability		-			509
Total current liabilities		11,993			10,601

Long term liabilities
Amegy credit facility		1,100			1,250
Deferred income tax liability		2,002			2,002
Total long-term liabilities		3,102			3,252

Total liabilities		15,095			13,853

Shareholders’ equity:
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 250,000,000 shares authorized; 129,440,752 shares issued at September 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012		1,294			1,294
Treasury stock (11,554,527 and 9,770,991 shares), at cost		(1,534	)		(1,227	)
Additional paid-in capital		85,300			85,201
Accumulated deficit		(62,424	)		(63,243	)
Total shareholders’ equity		22,636			22,025

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	37,731		$	35,878

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

WILHELMINA INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2013			September 30, 2012			September 30, 2013			September 30, 2012
Revenues
Revenues	$	17,965		$	12,964		$	47,858		$	40,923
License fees and other income		134			633			507			1,478
Total revenues		18,099			13,597			48,365			42,401

Model costs		12,626			9,226			33,674			28,614

Revenues net of model costs		5,473			4,371			14,691			13,787

Operating expenses
Salaries and service costs		2,818			2,456			8,461			7,464
Office and general expenses		979			867			2,591			2,538
Amortization and depreciation		394			387			1,177			1,172
Corporate overhead		265			301			909			1,144
Total operating expenses		4,456			4,011			13,138			12,318
Operating income		1,017			360			1,553			1,469

Other income (expense):
Equity in Earnings of 50% owned subsidiary earnings		19			28			21			55
Interest income		2			2			6			6
Interest expense		(13	)		(11	)		(41	)		(26	)
		8			19			(14	)		35

Income before provision for income taxes		1,025			379			1,539			1,504

Provision for income taxes
Current		(503	)		(47)			(720)			(377)
Deferred		-			-			-			-
		(503	)		(47)			(720)			(377)

Net income applicable to common stockholders	$	522		$	332		$	819		$	1,127


Basic and diluted net income per common share	$	0.00		$	0.00		$	0.01		$	0.01

Weighted average common shares outstanding		119,094			124,108			119,475			127,663

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

WILHELMINA INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	819		$	1,127
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Amortization and depreciation		1,177			1,172
Share based payment expense		99			14
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable		(2,419	)		2,228
(Increase) in prepaid expenses and other assets		(111	)		(116	)
(Decrease) in foreign withholding claim		(428	)		-
Increase (decrease) in due to models		1,302			(2,433	)
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities		966			347
(Decrease) in deferred revenues		-			(540	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,405			1,799

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		(344	)		(90	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(344	)		(90	)

Cash flows from financing activities
(Decrease) in earnout liability		(20	)		(1,735	)
Common stock repurchase		(307	)		(1,008	)
Proceeds from Amegy Bank credit facility		500			1,000
Repayment of Amegy Bank credit facility		(650	)		-
Net cash used in financing activities		(477	)		(1,743)

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		584			(34)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		1,145			3,128
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	1,729		$	3,094

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information
Cash paid for interest	$	41		$	26
Cash paid for income taxes	$	368		$	623

Supplemental disclosures of non cash information
Decrease in earnout liability from indemnification receivable offset	$	454		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements

WILHELMINA INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1. Basis of Presentation

The interim consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Wilhelmina International, Inc. (“Wilhelmina” or the “Company”) and subsidiaries without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Although certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in the consolidated financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, all adjustments considered necessary in order to make the consolidated financial statements not misleading have been included. In the opinion of the Company’s management, the accompanying interim unaudited consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments, of a normal recurring nature, that are necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows for such periods. It is recommended that these interim unaudited consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012, as amended. Results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim periods or the full fiscal year. Certain prior year reported amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Note 2. Business Activity

Overview

The Company’s primary business is fashion model management, which is headquartered in New York City. The Company’s predecessor was founded in 1967 by Wilhelmina Cooper, a renowned fashion model, and is one of the oldest, best known and largest fashion model management companies in the world. Since its founding, Wilhelmina has grown to include operations located in Los Angeles and Miami, as well as a growing network of licensees comprising leading modeling agencies in various local markets across the U.S. as well as in Panama, Thailand and Dubai. Wilhelmina provides traditional, full-service fashion model and talent management services, specializing in the representation and management of models, entertainers, artists, athletes and other talent to various customers and clients, including retailers, designers, advertising agencies and catalog companies.

Note 3. Line of Credit

On April 29, 2011, the Company closed a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) for a new $500,000 revolving credit facility with Amegy Bank National Association (“Amegy”). Borrowings under the facility are to be used for working capital and other general business purposes of the Company.

On January 12, 2012, the Company executed and closed an amendment (the “Credit Agreement Amendment”) to its revolving Credit Agreement with Amegy. Under the terms of the Credit Agreement Amendment, which was effective as of January 1, 2012, (1) total availability under the revolving credit facility was increased to $1,500,000 (from $500,000), (2) the borrowing base was modified to 65% (from 80%) of eligible accounts receivable (as defined in the Credit Agreement) and (3) the Company's minimum net worth covenant was increased to $21,250,000 (from $20,000,000). In addition, the maturity date of the facility was extended to December 31, 2012. The parties also executed an amendment to their pledge and security agreement ("Security Agreement Amendment") to reflect the execution of the Credit Agreement Amendment. The Company's obligation to repay advances under the amended facility is evidenced by an amended and restated promissory note.

On October 24, 2012, the Company executed and closed the second amendment (the “Second Credit Agreement Amendment”) to its revolving Credit Agreement with Amegy, which amended and replaced the terms amended by the Credit Agreement Amendment. Under the terms of the Second Credit Agreement Amendment, (1) total availability under the revolving credit facility was increased to $5,000,000 (from $1,500,000), (2) the borrowing base was modified to 75% (from 65%) of eligible accounts receivable (as defined in the Credit Agreement) and (3) the Company’s minimum net worth covenant was increased to $22,000,000 (from $21,250,000). In addition, the maturity date of the facility was extended to October 15, 2015 (from December 31, 2012). The Company’s obligation to repay advances under the amended facility is evidenced by a second amended and restated promissory note (the “Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note”). Under the terms of the Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note, the interest rate on borrowings was reduced to the prime rate plus 1% (from prime plus 2%) and a minimum interest rate (formerly 5%) was eliminated.

As of November 12, 2013, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $1,100,000 under the Credit Agreement.

Note 4. Restricted Cash

At September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, the Company had approximately $222,000 of restricted cash that serves as collateral for the full amount of an irrevocable standby letter of credit. The letter of credit serves as additional security under the lease extension relating to the Company’s office space in New York that expires in February 2021.

Note 5. Licensing Agreements and Deferred Revenue

The Company is a party to various contracts by virtue of its relationship with certain talent. The various contracts contain terms and conditions which require the revenue and the associated talent cost to be recognized on a straight-line basis over the contract period. The Company is also a party to product licensing agreements with a talent it previously represented. Under the product licensing agreements, the Company will either earn a commission based on a certain percentage of the royalties earned by the talent or earn royalties from the licensee that is based on a certain percentage of net sales, as defined. The Company recognized revenue from product licensing agreements of approximately $108,000 and $180,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, and approximately $543,000 and $978,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.

During April 2012, the Company reached an agreement with a former talent with respect to the modification of payment direction terms under various contracts negotiated by the Company between such talent, certain customers and, in some cases, the Company. In connection with such modifications (which did not change amounts to which the Company is entitled in respect of such agreements), the Company and the former talent also executed mutual obligation releases relating to the parties’ former representation arrangements. In connection with the foregoing contracts, the Company was carrying deferred revenues of approximately $716,000 (of which approximately $61,000 and $183,000 were scheduled to be recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, in the absence of agreement), all of which were recognized during April 2012.

Note 6. Commitments and Contingencies

On May 2, 2012, Sean Patterson, the former President of the Company’s subsidiary, Wilhelmina International, Ltd. (“Wilhelmina International”), filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, against the Company, Wilhelmina International and Mark Schwarz, the Company’s Chairman of the Board, alleging, among other things, breach of Mr. Patterson’s expired employment agreement with Wilhelmina International, the invalidity and unenforceability of the non-competition and non-solicitation provisions contained in the employment agreement and defamation. Mr. Patterson is also seeking a declaration that the employment agreement, including the non-competition and non-solicitation provisions contained therein, are terminated and unenforceable against him. The Company believes these claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself.

On October 10, 2012, Wilhelmina International, Ltd. and Wilhelmina Models, Inc., two subsidiaries of the Company (the “Wilhelmina Subsidiary Parties”), received a Summons with Notice in connection with a purported class action lawsuit filed in New York State Supreme Court (New York County) naming the Wilhelmina Subsidiary Parties as defendants (the “Raske Litigation”). The Wilhelmina Subsidiary Parties were subsequently served the complaint. The complaint asserted claims, including breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment and conversion, allegedly arising out of, among other things, the handling and reporting of funds on behalf of models and the use of model images. Other defendants in the Raske Litigation included other model management companies, advertising firms and certain advertisers. On September 6, 2013, the lawsuit was dismissed in its entirety on various grounds, including plantiff’s lack of standing.

On October 28, 2013, the Company’s litigation counsel was informed by email from plaintiffs’ counsel that the Wilhelmina Subsidiary Parties have been named again as defendants in a new purported class action lawsuit filed in New York State Supreme Court (New York County) brought by the same lead counsel who represented plaintiffs in the Raske Litigation. The claims in the new lawsuit include breach of contract and unjust enrichment and are alleged to arise out of matters relating to those involved in the Raske Litigation, such as the handling and reporting of funds on behalf of models and the use of model images. Other parties named as defendants include other model management companies, advertising firms and certain advertisers. The Company believes the new claims are without merit and, assuming proper service is made on the Wilhelmina Subsidiary Parties in the lawsuit, intends to vigorously defend itself and its subsidiaries.

In addition to the legal proceedings otherwise disclosed herein, the Company is also engaged in various legal proceedings that are routine in nature and incidental to its business. None of these routine proceedings, either individually or in the aggregate, are believed, in the Company's opinion, to have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial position or its results of operations.

As of September 30, 2013, a number of the Company’s employees were covered by employment agreements that vary in length from one to three years. As of September 30, 2013, total compensation payable under the remaining contractual term of these agreements was approximately $1,747,000. In addition, the employment agreements contain non-compete provisions ranging from six months to one year following the term of the applicable agreement. Therefore subject to certain exceptions, as of September 30, 2013, invoking the non-compete provisions would require the Company to compensate additional amounts to the covered employees during the non-compete period in the amount of approximately $2,290,000. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company paid no compensation costs, compared to approximately $168,000 and $515,000 during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, in connection with certain non-compete and contractual arrangements of former employees.

During 2010, the Company received IRS notices totaling approximately $726,000 related to foreign withholding claims for tax years 2006 and 2008. As part of settlement negotiations with the IRS, the Company determined that approximately $197,000 of the foreign withholding claim for 2008 related to tax liabilities which the Company assumed upon its acquisition of Wilhelmina International and its affiliates in February 2009 (the “Wilhelmina Acquisition”). To satisfy this liability, the Company paid the IRS, including penalties and interest of $26,000, a total of $223,000 during the year ended December 31, 2011. Since this amount was previously accrued as a liability at the Wilhelmina Acquisition date, no adjustment was required.

During February 2013, the IRS division of Appeals concluded that there was no basis for abatement of the 2006 and 2008 foreign withholding claims, within the protective framework of reasonable cause, and therefore, closed the case. During March 2013, the Company paid approximately $454,000 in settlement of the foreign withholding claims for tax years 2006 and 2008.

The Company is indemnified by certain of the selling parties in the Wilhelmina Acquisition for losses incurred as a result of such deficiency notice, and the selling parties have confirmed such responsibility to the Company. Such indemnification is required to be satisfied in cash and/or, at the election of the Company, by offset to future earn-out payments.

During March 2013, the Company offset approximately $454,000 of the Company’s remaining approximately $509,000 earnout obligation (as of December 31, 2012) for losses incurred in the settlement of the foreign withholding claims for tax years 2006 and 2008.

Note 7. Share Capital

The Company has a shareholder’s rights plan (the “Rights Plan”). The Rights Plan provides for a dividend distribution of one preferred share purchase right (a “Right”) for each outstanding share of the Company's Common Stock, $.01 par value (the "Common Stock"). The terms of the Rights and the Rights Plan are set forth in a Rights Agreement, dated as of July 10, 2006, as amended, by and between the Company and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A., now known as The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Rights Agent (the “Rights Agreement”).

The Company’s Board of Directors adopted the Rights Plan to protect shareholder value by protecting the Company’s ability to realize the benefits of its net operating loss carryforwards (“NOLs”). In general terms, the Rights Plan imposes a significant penalty upon any person or group that acquires 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock without the prior approval of the Company’s Board of Directors. Shareholders that own 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock as of the close of business on the Record Date (as defined in the Rights Agreement) may acquire up to an additional 1% of the outstanding Common Stock without penalty so long as they maintain their ownership above the 5% level (such increase subject to downward adjustment by the Company’s Board of Directors if it determines that such increase will endanger the availability of the Company’s NOLs). In addition, the Company’s Board of Directors has exempted Newcastle Partners, L.P. (“Newcastle”), the Company’s largest shareholder, and may exempt any person or group that owns 5% or more if the Board of Directors determines that the person’s or group’s ownership will not endanger the availability of the Company’s NOLs. A person or group that acquires a percentage of Common Stock in excess of the applicable threshold is called an “Acquiring Person”. Any Rights held by an Acquiring Person are void and may not be exercised. The Company’s Board of Directors authorized the issuance of one Right per each share of Common Stock outstanding on the Record Date. If the Rights become exercisable, each Right would allow its holder to purchase from the Company one one-hundredth of a share of the Company’s Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 (the “Preferred Stock”), for a purchase price of $10.00. Each fractional share of Preferred Stock would give the shareholder approximately the same dividend, voting and liquidation rights as does one share of Common Stock. Prior to exercise, however, a Right does not give its holder any dividend, voting or liquidation rights.

Standstill Agreement

On April 24, 2013, the Company and Ronald L. Chez (“Chez”), a shareholder of the Company, entered into a letter agreement (the “Standstill Agreement”), pursuant to which Chez and his Affiliates (as defined in the Standstill Agreement) agreed not to, without the prior approval of the Board of Directors of the Company, (a) beneficially own in excess of 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock of the Company nor (b) directly or indirectly, make any proposal or offer to acquire (other than pursuant to a confidential proposal to the Board of Directors of the Company), or agree to acquire or to become the beneficial owner of (i) any shares of Common Stock, (ii) any other securities of the Company convertible, exchangeable or exercisable into shares of Common Stock or (iii) any other voting securities of the Company, which, when added together with any such securities beneficially owned by Chez and his Affiliates immediately prior thereto, would provide Chez and his Affiliates with voting power in the aggregate in excess of 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock.

The Company agreed to, within three (3) business days of the execution of the Standstill Agreement, promptly execute (and submit for signature by the Rights Agent) an amendment to the Rights Agreement, which amendment provides that Chez shall not be deemed to be an “Acquiring Person” under the Rights Agreement by virtue of (a) the acquisition of shares of Common Stock purchased by Chez and disclosed in the initial Schedule 13D with respect to his ownership of Company Common Stock filed by Chez on March 22, 2013 (the “Initial Chez 13D”) or (b) the acquisition of additional shares of Common Stock in one or more purchases which in the aggregate, when added together with the shares of Common Stock reflected in the Initial Chez 13D, do not exceed 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock.

The restrictions set forth in the Standstill Agreement will terminate upon the earlier of sixty (60) days following the expiration of the Rights Agreement or the earlier termination of the Rights Agreement (including pursuant to a redemption of the outstanding rights in accordance therewith) by the Company.

Amendment to Rights Agreement

On April 25, 2013, the Company entered into a Thirteenth Amendment (the “Thirteenth Amendment”) to the Rights Agreement. The Thirteenth Amendment, among other things, (i) amends the definition of Acquiring Person (as defined in the Rights Agreement) to provide that Chez shall not be deemed to be an Acquiring Person solely by virtue of (a) purchases by Chez, individually and through individual retirement accounts for his benefit, of shares of Common Stock which resulted in his beneficial ownership exceeding 4.99% of the Common Stock outstanding, as disclosed in the Initial Chez 13D (the “Reported Chez Purchases”) or (b) purchases by Chez, individually or through individual retirement accounts for his benefit, of a number of shares of Common Stock which in the aggregate, when added together with the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by Chez as reflected in the Initial Chez 13D (i.e., 6,701,857 shares of Common Stock), shall not exceed ten million (10,000,000) shares of Common Stock (the “Permitted Additional Chez Purchases”), (ii) amends the definition of Triggering Event (as defined in the Rights Agreement) to provide that no Triggering Event shall result solely by virtue of any Reported Chez Purchases or Permitted Additional Chez Purchases, (iii) provides that a Distribution Date (as defined in the Rights Agreement) shall not be deemed to have occurred solely by virtue of any Reported Chez Purchases or Permitted Additional Chez Purchases and (iv) provides that no Reported Chez Purchases or Permitted Additional Chez Purchases shall be deemed to be events that cause the Rights to become exercisable. The Thirteenth Amendment also provides for certain other conforming and technical amendments to the terms and provisions of the Rights Agreement.

Note 8. Income Taxes

Generally, the Company’s combined effective tax rate is high relative to reported net income as a result of certain amounts of amortization expense and corporate overhead not being deductible or attributable to states in which it operates. Currently, the majority of taxes being paid by the Company are state taxes, not federal. The Company operates in three states which have relatively high tax rates, California, New York and Florida. The Company’s combined (federal and state) effective tax rate would be even higher if it were not for federal net operating loss carryforwards available to offset current federal taxable income. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had federal income tax loss carryforwards of approximately $3,500,000, which begin expiring in 2019. Realization of the Company’s carryforwards is dependent on future taxable income. A portion of the Company’s federal net operating loss carryforwards were utilized to offset federal taxable income generated during the nine months ended September 30, 2013. A valuation allowance has been recorded to reflect the tax effect of the net loss carryforwards not used to offset a portion of the deferred tax liability resulting from the Wilhelmina Acquisition. Ownership changes, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code, may have limited the amount of net operating loss carryforwards that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income. Subsequent ownership changes could further affect the limitation in future years.

Note 9. Treasury Stock

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program, whereby the Company could repurchase up to 10,000,000 shares of its outstanding Common Stock. The shares may be repurchased from time-to-time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions at prices the Company deems appropriate. The program does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of Common Stock and the program may be modified or suspended at any time at the Company’s discretion. The stock repurchase plan will be funded through the Company’s cash on hand and the Credit Agreement.

During the year ended December 31, 2012, the Company repurchased 9,770,991 shares of Common Stock at an average price of approximately $0.126 per share, for a total of $1,227,000. The repurchase of 8,000,000 of such shares of Common Stock were effected through a broker dealer making a market in the Company’s shares on behalf of an affiliate of the Company. The remaining 1,770,991 shares of Common Stock were repurchased in the open market.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Board of Directors renewed and extended the Company’s share repurchase authority to enable it to repurchase up to an additional 10,000,000 shares of Common Stock. During the three months ended September 30, 2013, the Company repurchased 1,773,536 shares of Common Stock at an average price of approximately $0.174 per share, for a total of $307,726.

Subsequent to September 30, 2013, the Company has repurchased an additional 82,300 shares of Common Stock at an average price of approximately $0.182 per share, for a total of $15,005.

As of November 12, 2013, the Company has repurchased under the stock repurchase program a total of 11,626,827 shares of Common Stock at an average price of approximately $0.133 per share, for a total of $1,549,732.

Note 10. Related Parties

As of September 30, 2013, Mark Schwarz, the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Portfolio Manager of Newcastle Capital Management, L.P. (“NCM”), John Murray, Chief Financial Officer of NCM, and Evan Stone, the former Vice President and General Counsel of NCM, held the following executive officer and board of director positions with the Company: Chairman of the Board and Executive Chairman, Chief Financial Officer, and General Counsel and Secretary, respectively. NCM is the General Partner of Newcastle, which owns 48,614,513 shares of Common Stock. Clinton Coleman (Managing Director at NCM) and James Dvorak (Managing Director at NCM) also serve as directors of the Company.

The Company’s corporate headquarters are located at 200 Crescent Court, Suite 1400, Dallas, Texas 75201, which are also the offices of NCM. The Company occupies a portion of NCM space on a month-to-month basis at $2,500 per month, pursuant to a services agreement entered into between the parties. Pursuant to the services agreement, the Company receives the use of NCM’s facilities and equipment and accounting, legal and administrative services from employees of NCM. The Company incurred expenses pursuant to the services agreement totaling approximately $8,000 and $24,000 for each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company owed NCM $0 as of September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, under the services agreement.

The Company has an agreement with an unconsolidated affiliate to provide management and administrative services, as well as sharing of space. For each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and 2012, management fee and rental income from the unconsolidated affiliate amounted to approximately $27,000 and $81,000, respectively.

On July 31, 2012, the Company effected a repurchase of 8,000,000 shares of Common Stock involving an affiliate (See Note 9).

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following is a discussion of the interim unaudited consolidated financial condition and results of operations for the Company and its subsidiaries for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012. It should be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company, the notes thereto and other financial information included elsewhere in this report, and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, as amended.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains certain “forward-looking” statements as such term is defined in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and information relating to the Company and its subsidiaries that are based on the beliefs of the Company’s management as well as information currently available to the Company’s management. When used in this report, the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “expect” and “intend” and words or phrases of similar import, as they relate to the Company or its subsidiaries or Company management, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements reflect the current risks, uncertainties and assumptions related to certain factors including, without limitation, competitive factors, general economic conditions, the interest rate environment, governmental regulation and supervision, seasonality, changes in industry practices, one-time events and other factors described herein and in other filings made by the Company with the SEC. Based upon changing conditions, should any one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should any underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those described herein as anticipated, believed, estimated, expected or intended. The Company does not undertake any obligation to publicly update these forward-looking statements. As a result, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.

OVERVIEW

The Company’s primary business is fashion model management, which is headquartered in New York City. The Company’s predecessor was founded in 1967 by Wilhelmina Cooper, a renowned fashion model, and is one of the oldest, best known and largest fashion model management companies in the world. Since its founding, it has grown to include operations located in Los Angeles and Miami, as well as a growing network of licensees comprising leading modeling agencies in various local markets across the U.S., as well as in Panama, Thailand and Dubai. The Company provides traditional, full-service fashion model and talent management services, specializing in the representation and management of models, entertainers, artists, athletes and other talent to various customers and clients, including retailers, designers, advertising agencies and catalog companies.

The business of talent management firms, such as Wilhelmina, depends heavily on the state of the advertising industry, as demand for talent is driven by Internet, print and TV advertising campaigns for consumer goods and retail clients.

Wilhelmina believes it has strong brand recognition which enables it to attract and retain top agents and talent to service a broad universe of clients. In order to take advantage of these opportunities and support its continued growth, the Company will need to continue to successfully allocate resources and staffing in a way that enhances its ability to respond to these new opportunities. The Company continues to focus on cutting costs, recruiting top agents when available and scouting and developing new talent.

Although Wilhelmina has a large and diverse client base, it is not immune to global economic conditions. Wilhelmina closely monitors economic conditions, client spending and other factors and continually looks for ways to reduce costs, manage working capital and conserve cash. There can be no assurance as to the effects on Wilhelmina of future economic circumstances, client spending patterns, client credit worthiness and other developments and whether, or to what extent, Wilhelmina’s efforts to respond to them will be effective.

Trends and Opportunities

The Company expects that the combination of Wilhelmina’s main operating base in New York City, the industry’s capital, with the depth and breadth of its talent pool and client roster and its diversification across various talent management segments, together with its geographical reach should make Wilhelmina’s operations more resilient to industry changes and economic swings than those of many of the smaller firms operating in the industry. Similarly, in the segments where Wilhelmina competes with other leading full service agencies, Wilhelmina competed successfully during the first nine months of 2013.

With total advertising expenditures on major media (newspapers, magazines, television, cinema, outdoor and Internet) amounting to approximately $165 billion in 2011 and $172 billion 2012, North America is by far the world’s largest advertising market. For the fashion talent management industry, including Wilhelmina, advertising expenditures on magazines, television, Internet and outdoor are of particular relevance.

Strategy

Management’s strategy is to increase value to shareholders through the following initiatives:

• develop Wilhelmina into a global brand;

• expand the women’s high end fashion board;

• expand the Wilhelmina Artist Management LLC (“WAM”) business;

• strategic acquisitions;

• licensing the “Wilhelmina” name to leading model management agencies;

• licensing the “Wilhelmina” brand in connection with consumer products, cosmetics and other beauty products; and

• promoting model search contests, and events and partnering on media projects (television, film, books, etc.).

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS OF THE COMPANY FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 COMPARED TO THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2012

The key financial indicators that the Company reviews to monitor the business are gross billings, revenues, model costs, operating expenses and cash flows.

The Company analyzes revenue by reviewing the mix of revenues generated by the different “boards” (each a specific division of the fashion model management operations which specializes by the type of model it represents (Women, Men, Select, Media, Runway, Curve, Lifestyle, Kids, etc.)) of the business, revenues by geographic locations and revenues from significant clients. Wilhelmina has three primary sources of revenue: revenues from principal relationships whereby the gross amount billed to the client is recorded as revenue, when the revenues are earned and collectability is reasonably assured; revenues from agent relationships whereby the commissions paid by models as a percentage of their gross earnings are recorded as revenue when earned and collectability is reasonably assured; and separate service charges, paid by clients in addition to the booking fees, which are calculated as a percentage of the models’ booking fees and are recorded as revenues when earned and collectability is reasonably assured. See Critical Accounting Policies - Revenue Recognition. Gross billings are an important business metric that ultimately drive revenues, profits and cash flows.

Because Wilhelmina provides professional services, salary and service costs represent the largest part of the Company’s operating expenses. Salary and service costs are comprised of payroll and related costs and T&E (travel, meals and entertainment) to deliver the Company’s services and to enable new business development activities.

Analysis of Consolidated Statements of Operations and Gross Billings

	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2013			September 30, 2012			Percent Change 2013 vs 2012			September 30, 2013			September 30, 2012			Percent Change 2013 vs 2012

GROSS BILLINGS		18,735,000			16,195,000			15.7	%		50,716,000			47,968,000			5.7	%

Revenues		17,965,000			12,964,000			38.6	%		47,858,000			40,923,000			16.9	%
License fees and other income		134,000			633,000			(78.8	%)		507,000			1,478,000			(65.7	%)
TOTAL REVENUES		18,099,000			13,597,000			33.1	%		48,365,000			42,401,000			14.1	%
Model costs		12,626,000			9,226,000			36.9	%		33,674,000			28,614,000			17.7	%
REVENUES NET OF MODEL COSTS		5,473,000			4,371,000			25.2	%		14,691,000			13,787,000			6.6	%
GROSS PROFIT MARGIN		30.2	%		32.1	%					30.4	%		32.5	%
Salaries and service costs		2,818,000			2,456,000			14.7	%		8,461,000			7,464,000			13.4	%
Office and general expenses		979,000			867,000			12.9	%		2,591,000			2,538,000			2.1	%
Amortization and depreciation		394,000			387,000			1.8	%		1,177,000			1,172,000			0.4	%
Corporate overhead		265,000			301,000			(12.0	%)		909,000			1,144,000			(20.5	%)
OPERATING INCOME		1,017,000			360,000			182.5	%		1,553,000			1,469,000			5.7	%
OPERATING MARGIN		5.6	%		2.6	%					3.2	%		3.5	%
Interest income		2,000			2,000			0.0	%		6,000			6,000			0.0	%
Interest expense		(13,000	)		(11,000	)		18.2	%		(41,000	)		(26,000	)		57.7	%
Equity Earnings in affiliate		19,000			28,000			(32.1	%)		21,000			55,000			(61.8	%)
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES		1,025,000			379,000			170.4	%		1,539,000			1,504,000			2.3	%
Income taxes		503,000			47,000			970.2	%		720,000			377,000			91.0	%
Effective tax rate		49.1	%		12.4	%					46.8	%		25.1	%
NET INCOME		522,000			332,000			57.2	%		819,000			1,127,000			(27.3	%)

Gross Billings

Generally, the Company’s gross billings fluctuate in response to its clients’ willingness to spend on advertising and the Company’s ability to have the desired talent available.

The Company experienced a 39% and 19% increase in gross billings across the core modeling business, during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, which were partially offset by significant decreases in the gross billings of the WAM business, when compared to the gross billings across the core modeling and WAM businesses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012. Gross billings of the WAM business decreased due to reduced fixed payments earned under a product licensing agreement (per the terms of the contract) and due to the expiration of another product licensing agreement (per the terms of the contract), which the Company was a party to, with a former talent. Management expects gross billings and operating results from the WAM business to continue to decline in 2013 as compared to 2012, as a result of existing product licensing agreements expiring over the next nine to twelve months. Management cannot estimate the impact of any new product licensing agreements, which would offset this trend. Gross billings of the WAM division represented approximately 5% and 6% of total gross billings for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively, compared to approximately 21% and 17% of total gross billings for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.

During the three months ended September 30, 2013, gross billings of the various boards of the core modeling business experienced positive growth ranging from 12% to 88%, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012. During the nine months ended September 30, 2013, gross billings of the various boards of the core modeling business experienced positive growth ranging from 10% to 71%, and three boards experienced negative growth ranging from (9%) to (17%), compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Revenues

The increase in revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, is attributable to the increases in gross billings of the core modeling business, partially offset by a decline in licensing fees (as discussed above).

License Fees and Other Income

License fees and other income include the following:

Product licensing agreements between the Company, its clients and talent, whereby the Company participates in the sharing of royalties. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, royalties from these licensing agreements totaled approximately $108,000 and $180,000, respectively, compared to $543,000 and $978,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. As previously mentioned, fixed royalty payments earned have declined under a product licensing agreement (per the terms of the contract) and due to the expiration of another product licensing agreement (per the terms of the contract), which the Company was a party to, with a former talent. Management expects royalty payments earned to continue to decline in 2013 as compared to 2012, as a result of existing product licensing agreements expiring over the next nine to twelve months.

An agreement between the Company and an unconsolidated affiliate to provide management and administrative services, as well as sharing of space. For each of the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, management fee and rental income from the unconsolidated affiliate amounted to approximately $27,000 and $81,000, respectively.

Franchise revenues from independently owned model agencies that use the Wilhelmina trademark name and various services provided by the Company. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, franchise fees totaled approximately $78,000 and $244,000 respectively when compared to $65,000 and $189,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.

·	Fees derived from participants in the Company’s model search contests, events and television syndication royalties.

Gross Profit Margin

Fluctuations in gross profit margin, between periods, are predominantly due to the following:

·	The mix of revenues being derived from talent relationships, which require the reporting of revenues gross (as a principal) versus net (as an agent). Model costs consist of costs associated with relationships with models where the key indicators suggest that the Company acts as a principal.

·	An increase or decrease in mother agency fees, relative to model costs.

·	An increase or decrease in the rate of recovery of advances to models (for the cost of producing initial portfolios and other out-of-pocket costs). These costs are expensed as incurred and repayments of such costs are credited to model costs in the period received.

Gross profit margins were lower during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, when compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, as a result of a significant decrease in revenues which were reported on a net basis. Royalties earned in the WAM business are reported on a net basis and have decreased significantly, as previously discussed.

The rate of recovery of certain costs advanced to models (which causes margins to increase) increased during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 when compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012. The increase in the recovery of certain costs advanced to models is the result of the increase in gross billings across the core modeling business.

Salaries and Service Costs

Salaries and service costs consist of payroll and related costs and T&E (travel, meals and entertainment) costs required to deliver the Company’s services to its customers and talent. The following factors contributed to the increases in salaries and services costs when comparing the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012:

·	The Company has hired additional key personnel to execute the Company’s strategy to increase value to shareholders through the initiatives discussed in the “Strategy” section above.

·	During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, the Company experienced an increase in T&E costs in connection with delivering services to its customers and models.

The increases in salaries and services costs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013 compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 were partially offset by the fact that during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company paid compensation costs of approximately $168,000 and $515,000, respectively, in connection with certain non-compete and contractual arrangements of former employees.

Office and General Expenses

Office and general expenses consist of office and equipment rents, advertising and promotion, insurance expenses, administration and technology cost. These costs are less directly linked to changes in the Company’s revenues than are salaries and service costs.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, office and general expenses increased, when compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, due to costs associated with legal and professional fees, technology, and leases associated with equipment and property. The Company continues to invest in technology, equipment and property to improve delivery of model management services to its talent.

The amount of office and general expenses as a percentage of revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was 5.4% compared to 6.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012.

Operating Margin

Operating margins increased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, when compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, as a result of an increase in revenues from the core modeling business, partially offset by a decrease in royalties earned in the WAM business and increases in salaries and service costs.

Amortization and Depreciation

Depreciation and amortization expense is incurred with respect to certain assets, including computer hardware, software, office equipment, furniture, and other intangibles. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, depreciation and amortization expense totaled $394,000 and $1,177,000 (of which $357,000 and $1,071,000 relates to amortization of intangibles acquired in connection with the Wilhelmina Acquisition), compared to $387,000 and $1,172,000 of depreciation and amortization expense during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 (of which $357,000 and $1,082,000 relates to amortization of intangibles acquired in connection with the Wilhelmina Acquisition). Fixed asset purchases totaled approximately $339,000 and $90,000 during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012, respectively. Approximately $270,000 of the fixed assets purchases during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 related to leasehold improvements and new fixtures in the New York office. In accordance with New York office lease (office located at 300 Park Ave South), the Company is entitled to a reimbursement from the landlord of approximately $190,000 of leasehold improvements. The Company expects to receive reimbursement from the Landlord in early 2014.

Corporate Overhead

Corporate overhead expenses include public company costs, director and executive officer compensation, directors’ and officers’ insurance, legal, audit and professional fees, corporate office rent and travel. Corporate overhead decreased for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, when compared to the three months ended September 30, 2012 due to a decline in stock exchange and executive search fees.

Asset Impairment Charge

Each reporting period, the Company assesses whether events or circumstances have occurred which indicate that the carrying amount of an intangible asset exceeds its fair value. If the carrying amount of the intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an asset impairment charge will be recognized in an amount equal to that excess. No asset impairment charges were incurred during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 and September 30, 2012.

Interest Expense

The increase in interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, when compared to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, is the result of an increase in average borrowings under the Credit Agreement.

Income Taxes

Generally, the Company’s combined effective tax rate is high relative to reported net income as a result of certain amounts of amortization expense and corporate overhead not being deductible or attributable to states in which it operates. Currently, the majority of taxes being paid by the Company are state taxes, not federal taxes. The Company operates in three states which have relatively high tax rates, California, New York and Florida. The Company’s combined (federal and state) effective tax rate would be even higher if it were not for federal net operating loss carryforwards available to offset current federal taxable income. As of September 30, 2013, the Company had federal income tax loss carryforwards of approximately $3,500,000, which begin expiring in 2019. Realization of the Company’s carryforwards is dependent on future taxable income. A portion of the Company’s federal net operating loss carryforwards were utilized to offset federal taxable income generated during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013. A valuation allowance has been recorded to reflect the tax effect of the net loss carryforwards not used to offset a portion of the deferred tax liability resulting from the Wilhelmina Acquisition. Ownership changes, as defined in the Internal Revenue Code, may have limited the amount of net operating loss carryforwards that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income. Subsequent ownership changes could further affect the limitation in future years.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company’s cash balance increased to $1,729,000 at September 30, 2013, from $1,145,000 at December 31, 2012. For the nine months ended September 30, 2013, cash balances increased as a result of cash flows from operations of approximately $1,854,000 before the payment of approximately $454,000 in settlement of foreign withholding tax claims for tax years 2006 and 2008. The Company offset approximately $454,000 of its remaining approximately $509,000 Miami Earnout obligation (as of December 31, 2012) for losses incurred in the settlement of these foreign withholding claims for tax years 2006 and 2008.

Cash flows from operations during the nine months ended September 30, 2013 were negatively impacted by a significant increase in accounts receivable balances which were partially offset by an increase in amounts due to models. The increased carrying amounts in these balance sheet accounts as of September 30, 2013, when compared to December 31, 2012, are in line with management’s expectations given the growth in revenues during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Cash flow from operations were also utilized during the nine months ended September 30, 2013, to make payments under the Credit Agreement with Amegy of $150,000 and to repurchase 1,773,536 shares of the Company’s Common Stock, totaling approximately $307,000.

The Company’s primary liquidity needs are for financing working capital associated with the expenses it incurs in performing services under its client contracts. Generally, the Company incurs significant operating expenses with payment terms shorter than its average collections on billings.

Amegy Credit Agreement

On October 24, 2012, the Company executed and closed the Second Credit Agreement Amendment to its revolving Credit Agreement with Amegy, which amended and replaced the terms amended by the Credit Agreement Amendment. Under the terms of the Second Credit Agreement Amendment, (1) total availability under the revolving credit facility is $5,000,000, (2) the borrowing base is 75% of eligible accounts receivable (as defined in the Credit Agreement) and (3) the Company’s minimum net worth covenant is $22,000,000. The maturity date of the facility is October 15, 2015. Under the terms of the Second Amended and Restated Promissory Note, the interest rate on borrowings is prime rate plus 1%.

As of November 12, 2013, the Company had outstanding borrowings of $1,100,000 under the Credit Agreement.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of September 30, 2013, the Company had $222,000 of restricted cash that serves as collateral for an irrevocable standby letter of credit. The letter of credit serves as additional security under the lease extension relating to the Company’s office space in New York City that expires February 2021.

Effect of Inflation

Inflation has not been a material factor affecting the Company’s business. General operating expenses, such as salaries, employee benefits, insurance and occupancy costs, are subject to normal inflationary pressures.

Critical Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition

In compliance with generally accepted accounting principles when reporting revenue gross as a principal versus net as an agent, the Company assesses whether it, the model or the talent is the primary obligor. The Company evaluates the terms of its model, talent and client agreements as part of this assessment. In addition, the Company gives appropriate consideration to other key indicators such as latitude in establishing price, discretion in model or talent selection and credit risk the Company undertakes. The Company operates broadly as a modeling agency and in those relationships with models and talent where the key indicators suggest the Company acts as a principal, the Company records the gross amount billed to the client as revenue when earned and collectability is reasonably assured and the related costs incurred to the model or talent as model or talent cost. In other model and talent relationships, where the Company believes the key indicators suggest it acts as an agent on behalf of the model or talent, the Company records revenue net of pass-through model or talent cost.

The Company also recognizes management fees as revenues for providing services to other modeling agencies as well as consulting income in connection with services provided to a television production network according to the terms of the contract. The Company recognizes royalty income when earned based on terms of the contractual agreement. Revenues received in advance are deferred and amortized using the straight-line method over periods pursuant to the related contract.

The Company also records fees from licensees when the revenues are earned and collectability is reasonably assured.

Advances to models for the cost of producing initial portfolios and other out-of-pocket costs are expensed to model costs as incurred. Any repayments of such costs are credited to model costs in the period received.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill and intangible assets consist primarily of goodwill and buyer relationships resulting from a business acquisition. Goodwill and intangible assets with indefinite lives are no longer subject to amortization, but rather to an annual assessment of impairment by applying a fair-value based test.

Management’s assessments of the recoverability and impairment tests of goodwill and intangible assets involve critical accounting estimates. These estimates require significant management judgment, include inherent uncertainties and are often interdependent; therefore, they do not change in isolation. Factors that management must estimate include, among others, the economic life of the asset, sales volume, prices, inflation, cost of capital, marketing spending, tax rates and capital spending. These factors are even more difficult to predict when global financial markets are highly volatile. When performing impairment tests, the Company estimates the fair values of the assets using management’s best assumptions, which it believes would be consistent with what a hypothetical marketplace participant would use. Estimates and assumptions used in these tests are evaluated and updated as appropriate. The variability of these factors depends on a number of conditions, including uncertainty about future events, and thus the accounting estimates may change from period to period. If other assumptions and estimates had been used when these tests were performed, impairment charges could have resulted.

Business Combinations

In a business combination, contingent consideration or earn outs will be recorded at their fair value at the acquisition date. Except in bargain purchase situations, contingent consideration typically will result in additional goodwill being recognized. Contingent consideration classified as an asset or liability will be adjusted to fair value at each reporting date through earnings until the contingency is resolved.

These estimates are subject to change upon the finalization of the valuation of certain assets and liabilities and may be adjusted.

Management is required to address the initial recognition, measurement and subsequent accounting for assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination, and requires that such assets acquired or liabilities assumed be initially recognized at fair value at the acquisition date if fair value can be determined during the measurement period. If the acquisition date fair value cannot be determined, the asset acquired or liability assumed arising from a contingency is recognized only if certain criteria are met. A systematic and rational basis for subsequently measuring and accounting for the assets or liabilities is required to be developed depending on their nature.

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements include the consolidated accounts of Wilhelmina and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable are accounted for at fair value, do not bear interest and are short-term in nature. The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability to collect on accounts receivable. Based on management’s assessment, the Company provides for estimated uncollectible amounts through a charge to earnings and a credit to the valuation allowance. Balances that remain outstanding after the Company has used reasonable collection efforts are written off through a charge to the valuation allowance and a credit to accounts receivable. The Company generally does not require collateral.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company continually assesses the need for a tax valuation allowance based on all available information. As of September 30, 2013, and as a result of this assessment, the Company does not believe that its deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be realized. In addition, the Company continuously evaluates its tax contingencies.

Accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements requires a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. Also, consideration should be given to de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition. There was no change to the net amount of assets and liabilities recognized in the consolidated balance sheets as a result of the Company’s tax positions.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Not applicable.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on their evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, with the participation of management, have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2013 to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is (a) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (b) accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Given these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there is only reasonable assurance that the Company’s controls will succeed in achieving their stated goals under all potential future conditions. The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of September 30, 2013.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

As of the end of the period covered by this report, there were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting, or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings.

On May 2, 2012, Sean Patterson, the former President of Wilhelmina International, filed a lawsuit in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, against the Company, Wilhelmina International and Mark Schwarz, the Company’s Chairman of the Board, alleging, among other things, breach of Mr. Patterson’s expired employment agreement with Wilhelmina International, the invalidity and unenforceability of the non-competition and non-solicitation provisions contained in the employment agreement and defamation. Mr. Patterson is also seeking a declaration that the employment agreement, including the non-competition and non-solicitation provisions contained therein, are terminated and unenforceable against him. The Company believes these claims are without merit and intends to vigorously defend itself.

On October 10,2012, Wilhelmina International, Ltd. and Wilhelmina Models, Inc., two subsidiaries of the Company (the “Wilhelmina Subsidairy Parties”) received a Summons with Notice in connection with a purported class action lawsuit filed in New York State Supreme Court (New York County) naming the Wilhelmina Subsidiary Parties as defendants (the “Raske Litigation”). The Wilhelmina Subsidiary Parties were subsequently served the complaint. The complaint asserted claims, including breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment and conversion, allegedly arising out of, among other things, the handling and reporting of funds on behalf of models and the use of model images. Other defendants in the Raske Litigation included other model management companies, advertising firms and certain advertisers. On September 6, 2013, the lawsuit was dismissed in its entirety on various grounds, including plantiff’s lack of standing..

Item 1.A.

Risk Factors.

Not applicable.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

The following table provides information regarding purchases of the Company’s Common Stock made by the Company during the third quarter of 2013:

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share	Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs	Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
July 1 – July 31, 2013	125,000	$0.164	125,000	104,009 shares
August 1 – August 31, 2013	810,000	$0.168	810,000	9,190,000 shares
September 1 – September 30, 2013	838,536	$0.181	838,536	8,351,464 shares
Total

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Item 5.

Other Information.

None.

Item 6.

Exhibits.

The following is a list of exhibits filed as part of this Form 10-Q:

Exhibit No.	Description

31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer in Accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.*
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer in Accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.*
32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer in Accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.*
32.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer in Accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.*
101. INS	XBRL Instance Document*
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema*
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase*
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase*
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase*
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase*

________________

* Filed herewith

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		WILHELMINA INTERNATIONAL, INC.
		(Registrant)


Date: November 12, 2013	By:	/s/ John P. Murray
	Name:	John P. Murray
	Title:	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.	Description

31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer in Accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.*
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer in Accordance with Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.*
32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer in Accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.*
32.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer in Accordance with Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.*
101. INS	XBRL Instance Document*
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema*
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase*
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase*
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase*
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase*

________________

* Filed herewith