UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended July 1, 2012
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 1-9183
Harley-Davidson, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Wisconsin | 39-1382325 | |
(State of organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
3700 West Juneau Avenue Milwaukee, Wisconsin |
53208 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip code) |
Registrants telephone number: (414) 342-4680
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes ¨ No x
Number of shares of the registrants common stock outstanding at August 2, 2012: 227,900,158 shares
Harley-Davidson, Inc.
Form 10-Q
For The Quarter Ended July 1, 2012
Part I | ||||||
Item 1. | 3 | |||||
3 | ||||||
4 | ||||||
5 | ||||||
6 | ||||||
7 | ||||||
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
40 | ||||
Item 3. | 61 | |||||
Item 4. | 61 | |||||
Part II | 63 | |||||
Item 1. | 63 | |||||
Item 2. | 63 | |||||
Item 6. | 64 | |||||
Signatures | 65 |
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | June 26, | July 1, | June 26, | |||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Motorcycles and related products |
$ | 1,569,047 | $ | 1,339,744 | $ | 2,842,416 | $ | 2,402,788 | ||||||||
Financial services |
160,613 | 165,853 | 316,935 | 327,739 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenue |
1,729,660 | 1,505,597 | 3,159,351 | 2,730,527 | ||||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Motorcycles and related products cost of goods sold |
1,005,230 | 871,476 | 1,822,089 | 1,582,654 | ||||||||||||
Financial services interest expense |
48,712 | 56,991 | 99,968 | 115,026 | ||||||||||||
Financial services provision for credit losses |
(5,259 | ) | (6,790 | ) | 3,754 | (1,184 | ) | |||||||||
Selling, administrative and engineering expense |
283,244 | 268,424 | 548,898 | 502,539 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring expense |
6,220 | 13,594 | 17,671 | 36,593 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
1,338,147 | 1,203,695 | 2,492,380 | 2,235,628 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
391,513 | 301,902 | 666,971 | 494,899 | ||||||||||||
Investment income |
2,231 | 1,748 | 4,164 | 3,146 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
11,595 | 11,350 | 23,090 | 22,831 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
382,149 | 292,300 | 648,045 | 475,214 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
134,899 | 101,720 | 228,760 | 165,374 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
247,250 | 190,580 | 419,285 | 309,840 | ||||||||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 247,250 | $ | 190,580 | $ | 419,285 | $ | 309,840 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Earnings per common share from continuing operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 1.08 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 1.83 | $ | 1.32 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 1.07 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 1.81 | $ | 1.31 | ||||||||
Earnings per common share from discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Earnings per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 1.08 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 1.83 | $ | 1.32 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 1.07 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 1.81 | $ | 1.31 | ||||||||
Cash dividends per common share |
$ | 0.155 | $ | 0.125 | $ | 0.310 | $ | 0.225 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
3
HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | June 26, | July 1, | June 26, | |||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
$ | 245,646 | $ | 207,055 | $ | 426,462 | $ | 345,486 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
4
HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited) | (Unaudited) | |||||||||||
July 1, | December 31, | June 26, | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2011 | ||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1,071,496 | $ | 1,526,950 | $ | 973,478 | ||||||
Marketable securities |
135,848 | 153,380 | 244,555 | |||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
250,268 | 219,039 | 265,663 | |||||||||
Finance receivables, net |
1,398,553 | 1,168,603 | 1,144,886 | |||||||||
Restricted finance receivables held by variable interest entities, net |
456,285 | 591,864 | 573,208 | |||||||||
Inventories |
323,046 | 418,006 | 337,472 | |||||||||
Restricted cash held by variable interest entities |
188,564 | 229,655 | 244,060 | |||||||||
Other current assets |
245,807 | 234,709 | 217,656 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total current assets |
4,069,867 | 4,542,206 | 4,000,978 | |||||||||
Finance receivables, net |
2,569,187 | 1,754,441 | 2,306,165 | |||||||||
Restricted finance receivables held by variable interest entities, net |
1,592,544 | 2,271,773 | 1,939,181 | |||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
776,793 | 809,459 | 788,943 | |||||||||
Goodwill |
28,604 | 29,081 | 31,156 | |||||||||
Other long-term assets |
279,789 | 267,204 | 295,556 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
$ | 9,316,784 | $ | 9,674,164 | $ | 9,361,979 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 252,239 | $ | 255,713 | $ | 277,395 | ||||||
Accrued liabilities |
535,097 | 564,172 | 590,096 | |||||||||
Short-term debt |
845,868 | 838,486 | 694,137 | |||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
399,962 | 399,916 | | |||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt held by variable interest entities |
507,427 | 640,331 | 635,604 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total current liabilities |
2,540,593 | 2,698,618 | 2,197,232 | |||||||||
Long-term debt |
2,745,189 | 2,396,871 | 2,893,462 | |||||||||
Long-term debt held by variable interest entities |
831,805 | 1,447,015 | 1,217,778 | |||||||||
Pension liability |
122,496 | 302,483 | 103,511 | |||||||||
Postretirement healthcare liability |
263,295 | 268,582 | 258,881 | |||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
147,019 | 140,339 | 159,719 | |||||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 16) |
||||||||||||
Total shareholders equity |
2,666,387 | 2,420,256 | 2,531,396 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
$ | 9,316,784 | $ | 9,674,164 | $ | 9,361,979 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
5
HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
Six months ended | ||||||||
July 1, | June 26, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations (Note 3) |
$ | 288,242 | $ | 472,962 | ||||
Cash flows from investing activities of continuing operations: |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(60,078 | ) | (69,267 | ) | ||||
Origination of finance receivables |
(1,583,572 | ) | (1,434,607 | ) | ||||
Collections on finance receivables |
1,435,790 | 1,416,610 | ||||||
Purchases of marketable securities |
(4,993 | ) | (142,653 | ) | ||||
Sales and redemptions of marketable securities |
23,046 | 39,966 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used by investing activities of continuing operations |
(189,807 | ) | (189,951 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities of continuing operations: |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of medium-term notes |
397,373 | 447,076 | ||||||
Proceeds from securitization debt |
91,030 | | ||||||
Repayments of securitization debt |
(839,401 | ) | (901,851 | ) | ||||
Net (decrease) increase in credit facilities and unsecured commercial paper |
(46,629 | ) | 131,039 | |||||
Net change in restricted cash |
41,091 | 44,827 | ||||||
Dividends |
(71,645 | ) | (53,152 | ) | ||||
Purchase of common stock for treasury |
(172,742 | ) | (5,678 | ) | ||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payments |
15,730 | 3,476 | ||||||
Issuance of common stock under employee stock option plans |
35,337 | 4,534 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used by financing activities of continuing operations |
(549,856 | ) | (329,729 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations |
(4,033 | ) | (1,702 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents of continuing operations |
(455,454 | ) | (48,420 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from discontinued operations: |
||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities of discontinued operations |
| (35 | ) | |||||
Cash flows from investing activities of discontinued operations |
| | ||||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operations |
| | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
| (35 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
$ | (455,454 | ) | $ | (48,455 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalentsbeginning of period |
$ | 1,526,950 | $ | 1,021,933 | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operationsbeginning of period |
| | ||||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(455,454 | ) | (48,455 | ) | ||||
Less: Cash and cash equivalents of discontinued operationsend of period |
| | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalentsend of period |
$ | 1,071,496 | $ | 973,478 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
6
HARLEY-DAVIDSON, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation and Use of Estimates
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Harley-Davidson, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the Company), including the accounts of the group of companies doing business as Harley-Davidson Motor Company (HDMC) and Harley-Davidson Financial Services (HDFS). In addition, certain variable interest entities (VIEs) related to secured financing are consolidated as the Company is the primary beneficiary. All intercompany accounts and material intercompany transactions are eliminated.
In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the condensed consolidated balance sheets as of July 1, 2012 and June 26, 2011, the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six month periods then ended, the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the three and six month periods then ended and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the six month periods then ended.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in complete financial statements have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial reporting. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
The Company operates in two business segments: Motorcycles & Related Products (Motorcycles) and Financial Services (Financial Services).
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and the accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
During 2008, the Company acquired Italian motorcycle manufacturer MV Agusta (MV). On October 15, 2009, the Company announced its intent to divest MV, and the Company completed the sale on August 6, 2010. MV is presented as a discontinued operation for all periods.
2. New Accounting Standards
Accounting Standards Recently Adopted
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-4 Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS.) ASU No. 2011-04 clarifies the application of the existing guidance within ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement, to ensure consistency between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU No. 2011-04 also requires new disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements related to Level 3 measurements and also requires new disclosures around transfers into and out of Level 1 and 2 in the fair value hierarchy. The Company adopted ASU No. 2011-04 on January 1, 2012. The required new disclosures are presented in Note 9.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. ASU No. 2011-05 amends the guidance within ASC Topic 220, Comprehensive Income, to eliminate the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of shareholders equity. ASU No. 2011-05 requires that all nonowner changes in shareholders equity be presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The Company decided to present comprehensive income in two separate but consecutive statements. The Company adopted ASU No. 2011-05 on January 1, 2012. The adoption of ASU No. 2011-05 and the Companys decision to present comprehensive income in two separate but consecutive statements required the presentation of an additional financial statement, condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income, for all periods presented.
7
3. Additional Balance Sheet and Cash Flow Information
Marketable Securities
The Companys marketable securities consisted of the following (in thousands):
July 1, | December 31, | June 26, | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Available-for-sale: |
||||||||||||
Corporate bonds |
$ | 135,848 | $ | 153,380 | $ | 194,556 | ||||||
U.S. Treasuries |
| | 49,999 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
$ | 135,848 | $ | 153,380 | $ | 244,555 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys available-for-sale securities are carried at fair value with any unrealized gains or losses reported in other comprehensive income. During the first half of 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized gross unrealized gains in other comprehensive income of $0.5 million and $1.7 million, respectively, or $0.3 million and $1.1 million net of taxes, respectively, to adjust amortized cost to fair value. The marketable securities have contractual maturities that generally come due over the next 12 to 48 months.
Inventories
Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. Substantially all inventories located in the United States are valued using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method. Other inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) method. Inventories consist of the following (in thousands):
July 1, | December 31, | June 26, | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Components at the lower of FIFO cost or market |
||||||||||||
Raw materials and work in process |
$ | 116,166 | $ | 113,932 | $ | 108,518 | ||||||
Motorcycle finished goods |
120,199 | 226,261 | 147,787 | |||||||||
Parts and accessories and general merchandise |
131,040 | 121,340 | 115,202 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Inventory at lower of FIFO cost or market |
367,405 | 461,533 | 371,507 | |||||||||
Excess of FIFO over LIFO cost |
(44,359 | ) | (43,527 | ) | (34,035 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
$ | 323,046 | $ | 418,006 | $ | 337,472 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
Operating Cash Flow
The reconciliation of net income to net cash provided by operating activities is as follows (in thousands):
Six months ended | ||||||||
July 1, | June 26, | |||||||
2012 | 2011 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 419,285 | $ | 309,840 | ||||
Loss from discontinued operations |
| | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Income from continuing operations |
419,285 | 309,840 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
85,997 | 89,543 | ||||||
Amortization of deferred loan origination costs |
38,075 | 39,054 | ||||||
Amortization of financing origination fees |
5,021 | 5,833 | ||||||
Provision for employee long-term benefits |
34,263 | 34,456 | ||||||
Contributions to pension and postretirement plans |
(213,648 | ) | (205,498 | ) | ||||
Stock compensation expense |
22,119 | 20,537 | ||||||
Net change in wholesale finance receivables related to sales |
(124,919 | ) | 11,909 | |||||
Provision for credit losses |
3,754 | (1,184 | ) | |||||
Pension and postretirement healthcare plan curtailment and settlement expense |
| 236 | ||||||
Foreign currency adjustments |
8,143 | (2,813 | ) | |||||
Other, net |
5,567 | 27,226 | ||||||
Changes in current assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
(34,977 | ) | 8,301 | |||||
Finance receivablesaccrued interest and other |
2,912 | 5,553 | ||||||
Inventories |
89,162 | (530 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
(12,286 | ) | 133,838 | |||||
Restructuring reserves |
(9,915 | ) | 3,195 | |||||
Derivative instruments |
(1,420 | ) | 1,195 | |||||
Other |
(28,891 | ) | (7,729 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total adjustments |
(131,043 | ) | 163,122 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash provided by operating activities of continuing operations |
$ | 288,242 | $ | 472,962 | ||||
|
|
|
|
9
4. Discontinued Operations
In October 2009, the Company unveiled a new business strategy to drive growth through a focus of efforts and resources on the unique strengths of the Harley-Davidson brand and to enhance productivity and profitability through continuous improvement. The Companys Board of Directors approved and the Company committed to the divestiture of MV as part of this strategy. The Company engaged a third party investment bank to assist with the marketing and sale of MV. During 2009, the Company recorded pre-tax impairment charges of $115.4 million related to MV and a net tax benefit of $40 million related to losses estimated in connection with the sale of MV. As of December 31, 2009, the Company estimated the total tax benefit associated with losses related to the sale of MV to be $66 million of which $26 million was deemed uncertain and appropriately reserved against.
At each subsequent reporting date in 2010 through the date of sale of MV in August 2010, the fair value less selling costs was re-assessed and additional impairment charges totaling $111.8 million and additional tax benefits totaling $18 million were recognized in 2010. As the effort to sell MV progressed into 2010, adverse factors led to decreases in the fair value of MV. During 2010, challenging economic conditions continued to persist, negatively impacting the appetite of prospective buyers and the motorcycle industry as a whole. Information coming directly from the selling process, including discussions with the prospective buyers, indicated a fair value that was less than previously estimated.
On August 6, 2010, the Company concluded its sale of MV to MV Augusta Motor Holding S.r.l., a company controlled by the former owner of MV. Under the agreement relating to the sale, (1) the Company received nominal consideration in return for the transfer of MV and related assets; (2) the parties waived their respective rights under the stock purchase agreement and other documents related to the Companys purchase of MV in 2008, which included a waiver of the former owners right to contingent earn-out consideration; and (3) the Company contributed 20.0 million Euros to MV as operating capital. The 20.0 million Euros contributed were factored into the Companys estimate of MVs fair value prior to the sale and was recognized in the 2010 impairment charges discussed above. As a result of the impairment charges recorded in 2009 and 2010 prior to the sale, the Company only incurred an immaterial loss on the date of sale, which was included in the loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, during the year ended December 31, 2010.
As of December 31, 2010, the Companys estimated total tax benefit associated with the loss on the sale of MV was $101.0 million, of which $43.5 million was deemed uncertain and appropriately reserved against. As a result, the total cumulative net tax benefit recognized as of December 31, 2010 was $57.5 million. The increase in the estimated tax benefit during 2010 was driven by an increase in the losses related to the sale of MV, not a change in the tax position.
In determining the tax benefit recognized from October 2009 through December 2010, the Company engaged appropriate technical expertise and considered all relevant available information. In accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes, at each balance sheet date during this period, the Company re-evaluated the overall tax benefit, determined that it was at least more likely than not that it would be sustained upon review and calculated the amount of recognized tax benefit based on a cumulative probability basis.
Beginning in 2010, the Company voluntarily elected to participate in a pre-filing agreement process with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) in order to accelerate their review of the Companys tax position related to MV. The IRS effectively completed its review in late 2011 and executed a Closing Agreement on Final Determination Covering Specific Matters with the Company.
There were no changes to the Companys estimated gross or recognized tax benefit associated with the loss on the sale of MV during the first three quarters of 2011. In the fourth quarter of 2011, given the outcome of the closing agreement, the Company recognized a $43.5 million tax benefit by reversing the reserve recorded as of September 25, 2011 and recognized an incremental $7.5 million tax benefit related to the final calculation of the tax basis in the loan to and the stock of MV.
10
5. Restructuring Expense
2011 Restructuring Plans
In December 2011, the Company made a decision to cease operations at New Castalloy, its Australian subsidiary and producer of cast motorcycle wheels and wheel hubs, and source those components through other existing suppliers (2011 New Castalloy Restructuring Plan). The Company expects the transition of supply from New Castalloy to be complete by mid-2013. The decision to close New Castalloy came as part of the Companys overall long term strategy to develop world-class manufacturing capability throughout the Company by restructuring and consolidating operations for greater competitiveness, efficiency and flexibility. In connection with this decision, the Company will reduce its workforce by approximately 200 employees by mid-2013.
Under the 2011 New Castalloy Restructuring Plan, restructuring expenses consist of employee severance and termination costs, accelerated depreciation and other related costs. The Company expects to incur approximately $30 million in restructuring charges related to the transition through 2013. Approximately 35% of the $30 million will be non-cash charges. On a cumulative basis, the Company has incurred $15.4 million of restructuring expense under the 2011 New Castalloy Restructuring Plan as of July 1, 2012, of which $6.0 million was incurred during the first six months of 2012.
In February 2011, the Companys unionized employees at its facility in Kansas City, Missouri ratified a new seven-year labor agreement. The new agreement took effect on August 1, 2011. The new contract is similar to the labor agreements ratified at the Companys Wisconsin facilities in September 2010 and its York, Pennsylvania facility in December 2009, and allows for similar flexibility and increased production efficiency. Once the new contract is fully implemented, the production system in Kansas City, like Wisconsin and York, will include the addition of a flexible workforce component.
After taking actions to implement the new ratified labor agreement (2011 Kansas City Restructuring Plan), the Company expects to have about 145 fewer full-time hourly unionized employees in its Kansas City facility than would have been required under the prior contract.
Under the 2011 Kansas City Restructuring Plan, restructuring expenses consist of employee severance and termination costs and other related costs. The Company expects to incur approximately $14 million in restructuring expenses related to the new contract through 2012, of which approximately 10% are expected to be non-cash. On a cumulative basis, the Company has incurred $7.8 million of restructuring expense under the 2011 Kansas City Restructuring Plan as of July 1, 2012. During the first six months of 2012, the Company released a portion of its 2011 Kansas City Restructuring Plan reserve related to severance costs as these costs are no longer expected to be incurred.
For the six months ended June 26, 2011, restructuring expense included $0.2 million of noncash curtailment losses related to the Companys pension plan that covers employees of the Kansas City facility.
11
The following table summarizes the Motorcycle segments 2011 Kansas City Restructuring Plan and 2011 New Castalloy Restructuring Plan reserve activity and balances as recorded in accrued liabilities (in thousands):
Six months ended July 1, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kansas City | New Castalloy | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Employee | Employee | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Severance and | Severance and | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Termination | Termination | Accelerated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Costs | Other | Total | Costs | Depreciation | Other | Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 4,123 | $ | | $ | 4,123 | $ | 8,428 | $ | | $ | 305 | $ | 8,733 | $ | 12,856 | ||||||||||||||||
Restructuring expense |
| | | 1,141 | 4,093 | 755 | 5,989 | 5,989 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Utilizedcash |
| | | (312 | ) | | (722 | ) | (1,034 | ) | (1,034 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Utilizednoncash |
| | | | (4,093 | ) | | (4,093 | ) | (4,093 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Noncash reserve release |
(967 | ) | | (967 | ) | | | | | (967 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 3,156 | $ | | $ | 3,156 | $ | 9,257 | $ | | $ | 338 | $ | 9,595 | $ | 12,751 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 26, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Kansas City | ||||||||||||
Employee | ||||||||||||
Severance and | ||||||||||||
Termination | ||||||||||||
Costs | Other | Total | ||||||||||
Restructuring expense |
7,177 | 340 | 7,517 | |||||||||
Utilizedcash |
(3,843 | ) | (340 | ) | (4,183 | ) | ||||||
Utilizednoncash |
(236 | ) | | (236 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 3,098 | $ | | $ | 3,098 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 Restructuring Plan
In September 2010, the Companys unionized employees in Wisconsin ratified three separate new seven-year labor agreements which took effect in April 2012 when the prior contracts expired. The new contracts are similar to the labor agreement ratified at the Companys York, Pennsylvania facility in December 2009 and allow for similar flexibility and increased production efficiency. Once the new contracts are fully implemented, the production system in Wisconsin, like York, will include the addition of a flexible workforce component.
Based on the new ratified labor agreements (2010 Restructuring Plan), the Company expects to have about 250 fewer full-time hourly unionized employees in its Milwaukee-area facilities when the contracts are fully implemented than would have been required under the prior contracts. In Tomahawk, the Company expects to have about 75 fewer full-time hourly unionized employees when the contract is fully implemented than would have been required under the prior contract.
Under the 2010 Restructuring Plan, restructuring expenses consist of employee severance and termination costs and other related costs. The Company expects to incur approximately $62 million in restructuring expenses related to the new contracts through 2012, of which approximately 42% are expected to be non-cash. On a cumulative basis, the Company has incurred $60.4 million of restructuring expense under the 2010 Restructuring Plan as of July 1, 2012, of which $3.5 million was incurred during the first six months of 2012.
12
The following table summarizes the Motorcycles segments 2010 Restructuring Plan reserve activity and balances as recorded in accrued liabilities (in thousands):
Six months ended | Six months ended | |||||||
July 1, 2012 | June 26, 2011 | |||||||
Employee | Employee | |||||||
Severance and | Severance and | |||||||
Termination Costs | Termination Costs | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 20,361 | $ | 8,652 | ||||
Restructuring expense |
3,457 | 6,296 | ||||||
Utilizedcash |
(10,053 | ) | (732 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 13,765 | $ | 14,216 | ||||
|
|
|
|
2009 Restructuring Plan
During 2009, in response to the U.S. economic recession and worldwide slowdown in consumer demand, the Company committed to a volume reduction and a combination of restructuring actions (2009 Restructuring Plan) that are expected to be completed at various dates between 2009 and 2012. The actions were designed to reduce administrative costs, eliminate excess capacity and exit non-core business operations. The Companys significant announced actions include the restructuring and transformation of its York, Pennsylvania production facility including the implementation of a new more flexible unionized labor agreement; consolidation of facilities related to engine and transmission production; outsourcing of certain distribution and transportation activities and exiting the Buell product line.
The 2009 Restructuring Plan includes an estimated reduction of approximately 2,700 to 2,900 hourly production positions and approximately 720 non-production, primarily salaried positions within the Motorcycles segment and approximately 100 salaried positions in the Financial Services segment.
Under the 2009 Restructuring Plan, restructuring expenses consist of employee severance and termination costs, accelerated depreciation on the long-lived assets that will be exited as part of the 2009 Restructuring Plan and other related costs. The Company expects total costs related to the 2009 Restructuring Plan to result in restructuring and impairment expenses of approximately $384 million to $404 million from 2009 to 2012, of which approximately 30% are expected to be non-cash. On a cumulative basis, the Company has incurred $389.8 million of restructuring and impairment expense under the 2009 Restructuring Plan as of July 1, 2012, of which $9.2 million was incurred during the first six months of 2012.
13
The following table summarizes the Companys 2009 Restructuring Plan reserve activity and balances recorded in accrued liabilities (in thousands):
Six months ended July 1, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Motorcycles & Related Products | ||||||||||||||||
Employee | ||||||||||||||||
Severance and | Accelerated | |||||||||||||||
Termination Costs | Depreciation | Other | Total | |||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 10,089 | $ | | $ | | $ | 10,089 | ||||||||
Restructuring expense |
331 | | 10,888 | 11,219 | ||||||||||||
Utilizedcash |
(1,878 | ) | | (10,888 | ) | (12,766 | ) | |||||||||
Utilizednoncash |
| | | | ||||||||||||
Noncash reserve release |
(2,027 | ) | | | (2,027 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 6,515 | $ | | $ | | $ | 6,515 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 26, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Motorcycles & Related Products | ||||||||||||||||
Employee | ||||||||||||||||
Severance and | Accelerated | |||||||||||||||
Termination Costs | Depreciation | Other | Total | |||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 23,818 | $ | | $ | 2,764 | $ | 26,582 | ||||||||
Restructuring expense |
3,504 | | 19,276 | 22,780 | ||||||||||||
Utilizedcash |
(8,159 | ) | | (20,341 | ) | (28,500 | ) | |||||||||
Utilizednoncash |
| | 253 | 253 | ||||||||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 19,163 | $ | | $ | 1,952 | $ | 21,115 |
Other restructuring costs under the 2009 Restructuring Plan include items such as the exit costs for terminating supply contracts, lease termination costs and moving costs. During the first six months of 2012, the Company released a portion of its 2009 Restructuring Plan reserve related to employee severance costs as these costs are no longer expected to be incurred.
6. Finance Receivables
HDFS provides retail financial services to customers of the Companys independent dealers in the United States and Canada. The origination of retail loans is a separate and distinct transaction between HDFS and the retail customer, unrelated to the Companys sale of product to its dealers. Retail finance receivables consist of secured promissory notes and installment loans. HDFS holds either titles or liens on titles to vehicles financed by promissory notes and installment loans.
HDFS offers wholesale financing to the Companys independent dealers. Wholesale loans to dealers are generally secured by financed inventory or property and are originated in the U.S. and Canada.
14
Finance receivables, net, including finance receivables held by VIEs, consisted of the following (in thousands):
July 1, | December 31, | June 26, | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Retail |
$ | 5,225,779 | $ | 5,087,490 | $ | 5,374,055 | ||||||
Wholesale |
905,038 | 824,640 | 733,789 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
6,130,817 | 5,912,130 | 6,107,844 | ||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses |
(114,248 | ) | (125,449 | ) | (144,404 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
$ | 6,016,569 | $ | 5,786,681 | $ | 5,963,440 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
At July 1, 2012, December 31, 2011 and June 26, 2011, the Companys Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet included finance receivables, net of $2.05 billion, $2.86 billion and $2.51 billion, respectively, which were restricted as collateral for the payment of debt held by VIEs and other related obligations as discussed in Note 7. These receivables are included in retail finance receivables in the table above.
A provision for credit losses on finance receivables is charged or credited to earnings in amounts that the Company believes are sufficient to maintain the allowance for credit losses on finance receivables at a level that is adequate to cover losses of principal inherent in the existing portfolio. The allowance for credit losses on finance receivables represents managements estimate of probable losses inherent in the finance receivable portfolio as of the balance sheet date. However, due to the use of projections and assumptions in estimating the losses, the amount of losses actually incurred by the Company could differ from the amounts estimated.
15
Changes in the allowance for credit losses on finance receivables by portfolio were as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended July 1, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Retail | Wholesale | Total | ||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 112,857 | $ | 9,646 | $ | 122,503 | ||||||
Provision for credit losses |
(3,681 | ) | (1,578 | ) | (5,259 | ) | ||||||
Charge-offs |
(17,054 | ) | | (17,054 | ) | |||||||
Recoveries |
14,058 | | 14,058 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 106,180 | $ | 8,068 | $ | 114,248 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Three months ended June 26, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Retail | Wholesale | Total | ||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 141,704 | $ | 17,980 | $ | 159,684 | ||||||
Provision for credit losses |
(2,596 | ) | (4,194 | ) | (6,790 | ) | ||||||
Charge-offs |
(22,903 | ) | (330 | ) | (23,233 | ) | ||||||
Recoveries |
14,743 | | 14,743 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 130,948 | $ | 13,456 | $ | 144,404 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Six months ended July 1, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Retail | Wholesale | Total | ||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 116,112 | $ | 9,337 | $ | 125,449 | ||||||
Provision for credit losses |
5,023 | (1,269 | ) | 3,754 | ||||||||
Charge-offs |
(42,906 | ) | | (42,906 | ) | |||||||
Recoveries |
27,951 | | 27,951 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 106,180 | $ | 8,068 | $ | 114,248 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Six months ended June 26, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Retail | Wholesale | Total | ||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 157,791 | $ | 15,798 | $ | 173,589 | ||||||
Provision for credit losses |
843 | (2,027 | ) | (1,184 | ) | |||||||
Charge-offs |
(58,094 | ) | (330 | ) | (58,424 | ) | ||||||
Recoveries |
30,408 | 15 | 30,423 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 130,948 | $ | 13,456 | $ | 144,404 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Included in the $106.2 and $130.9 million retail allowance for credit losses on finance receivables is $41.9 and $62.1 million, respectively, related to finance receivables held by VIEs.
Portions of the allowance for credit losses on finance receivables are specified to cover estimated losses on finance receivables specifically identified for impairment. The unspecified portion of the allowance for credit losses on finance receivables covers estimated losses on finance receivables which are collectively reviewed for impairment. Finance receivables are considered impaired when management determines it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the terms of the loan agreement.
16
The retail portfolio primarily consists of a large number of small balance, homogeneous finance receivables. HDFS performs a periodic and systematic collective evaluation of the adequacy of the retail allowance for credit losses. HDFS utilizes loss forecast models which consider a variety of factors including, but not limited to, historical loss trends, origination or vintage analysis, known and inherent risks in the portfolio, the value of the underlying collateral, recovery rates and current economic conditions including items such as unemployment rates. As retail finance receivables are collectively and not individually reviewed for impairment, this portfolio does not have finance receivables specifically impaired.
The wholesale portfolio is primarily composed of large balance, non-homogeneous loans. The Companys evaluation for the wholesale allowance for credit losses is first based on a loan-by-loan review. A specific allowance for credit losses is established for wholesale finance receivables determined to be individually impaired when management concludes that the borrower will not be able to make full payment of the contractual amounts due based on the original terms of the loan agreement. The impairment is determined based on the cash that the Company expects to receive discounted at the loans original interest rate or the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral-dependent. Finance receivables in the wholesale portfolio that are not considered impaired on an individual basis are segregated, based on similar risk characteristics, according to the Companys internal risk rating system and collectively evaluated for impairment. The related allowance for credit losses is based on factors such as the specific borrowers financial performance and ability to repay, the Companys past loan loss experience, current economic conditions, and the value of the underlying collateral.
Generally, it is the Companys policy not to change the terms and conditions of finance receivables. However, to minimize the economic loss, the Company may modify certain finance receivables in troubled debt restructurings. Total restructured finance receivables are not significant.
The allowance for credit losses and finance receivables by portfolio, segregated by those amounts that are individually evaluated for impairment and those that are collectively evaluated for impairment was, as follows (in thousands):
July 1, 2012 | ||||||||||||
Retail | Wholesale | Total | ||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses, ending balance: |
||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
106,180 | 8,068 | 114,248 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total allowance for credit losses |
$ | 106,180 | $ | 8,068 | $ | 114,248 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Finance receivables, ending balance: |
||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
5,225,779 | 905,038 | 6,130,817 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total finance receivables |
$ | 5,225,779 | $ | 905,038 | $ | 6,130,817 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Retail | Wholesale | Total | ||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses, ending balance: |
||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
116,112 | 9,337 | 125,449 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total allowance for credit losses |
$ | 116,112 | $ | 9,337 | $ | 125,449 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Finance receivables, ending balance: |
||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
5,087,490 | 824,640 | 5,912,130 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total finance receivables |
$ | 5,087,490 | $ | 824,640 | $ | 5,912,130 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
June 26, 2011 | ||||||||||||
Retail | Wholesale | Total | ||||||||||
Allowance for credit losses, ending balance: |
||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
$ | | $ | 3,031 | $ | 3,031 | ||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
130,948 | 10,425 | 141,373 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total allowance for credit losses |
$ | 130,948 | $ | 13,456 | $ | 144,404 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Finance receivables, ending balance: |
||||||||||||
Individually evaluated for impairment |
$ | | $ | 4,676 | $ | 4,676 | ||||||
Collectively evaluated for impairment |
5,374,055 | 729,113 | 6,103,168 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total finance receivables |
$ | 5,374,055 | $ | 733,789 | $ | 6,107,844 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no wholesale finance receivables at July 1, 2012 or December 31, 2011 that were individually deemed to be impaired under ASC Topic 310, Receivables. Additional information related to the wholesale finance receivables that were individually deemed to be impaired under ASC Topic 310, Receivables, at June 26, 2011 includes (in thousands):
June 26, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unpaid | Average | Interest | Average | Interest | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Recorded | Principal | Related | Recorded | Income | Recorded | Income | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment | Balance | Allowance | Investment | Recognized | Investment | Recognized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Wholesale: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
No related allowance recorded |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Related allowance recorded |
4,676 | 4,441 | 3,031 | 4,932 | | 5,050 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Total impaired wholesale finance receivables |
$ | 4,676 | $ | 4,441 | $ | 3,031 | $ | 4,932 | $ | | $ | 5,050 | $ | | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail finance receivables are contractually delinquent if the minimum payment is not received by the specified due date. Retail finance receivables are generally charged-off at 120 days contractually past due. Retail finance receivables accrue interest until either collected or charged-off. Accordingly, as of July 1, 2012, December 31, 2011 and June 26, 2011, all retail finance receivables were accounted for as interest-earning receivables, of which $14.8 million, $27.5 million and $18.7 million, respectively, were 90 days or more past due.
Wholesale finance receivables are delinquent if the minimum payment is not received by the contractual due date. A specific allowance for credit losses is established once management determines that the borrower does not have the ability to repay the loan in full. Interest continues to accrue on past due wholesale finance
18
receivables until the date the collection of the finance receivables becomes doubtful, at which time the finance receivable is placed on non-accrual status. The Company will resume accruing interest on these wholesale finance receivables when payments are current according to the terms of the loan agreements and future payments are reasonably assured. While on non-accrual status, all cash received is applied to principal or interest as appropriate. There were no wholesale receivables on non-accrual status at July 1, 2012 or December 31, 2011. The recorded investment of non-accrual status wholesale finance receivables at June 26, 2011 was $4.7 million. At July 1, 2012, December 31, 2011 and June 26, 2011, $0.6 million, $0.9 million, and $1.2 million of wholesale finance receivables were 90 days or more past due and accruing interest, respectively.
An analysis of the aging of past due finance receivables, which includes non-accrual status finance receivables was as follows (in thousands):
July 1, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greater than | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
31-60 Days | 61-90 Days | 90 Days | Total | Finance | ||||||||||||||||||||
Current | Past Due | Past Due | Past Due | Past Due | Receivables | |||||||||||||||||||
Retail |
$ | 5,101,847 | $ | 84,858 | $ | 24,247 | $ | 14,827 | $ | 123,932 | $ | 5,225,779 | ||||||||||||
Wholesale |
902,891 | 1,125 | 468 | 554 | 2,147 | 905,038 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 6,004,738 | $ | 85,983 | $ | 24,715 | $ | 15,381 | $ | 126,079 | $ | 6,130,817 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greater than | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
31-60 Days | 61-90 Days | 90 Days | Total | Finance | ||||||||||||||||||||
Current | Past Due | Past Due | Past Due | Past Due | Receivables | |||||||||||||||||||
Retail |
$ | 4,915,711 | $ | 107,373 | $ | 36,937 | $ | 27,469 | $ | 171,779 | $ | 5,087,490 | ||||||||||||
Wholesale |
822,610 | 777 | 344 | 909 | 2,030 | 824,640 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 5,738,321 | $ | 108,150 | $ | 37,281 | $ | 28,378 | $ | 173,809 | $ | 5,912,130 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
June 26, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greater than | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
31-60 Days | 61-90 Days | 90 Days | Total | Finance | ||||||||||||||||||||
Current | Past Due | Past Due | Past Due | Past Due | Receivables | |||||||||||||||||||
Retail |
$ | 5,205,300 | $ | 115,163 | $ | 34,860 | $ | 18,732 | $ | 168,755 | $ | 5,374,055 | ||||||||||||
Wholesale |
730,476 | 816 | 387 | 2,110 | 3,313 | 733,789 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 5,935,776 | $ | 115,979 | $ | 35,247 | $ | 20,842 | $ | 172,068 | $ | 6,107,844 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A significant part of managing HDFS finance receivable portfolios includes the assessment of credit risk associated with each borrower. As the credit risk varies between the retail and wholesale portfolios, HDFS utilizes different credit risk indicators for each portfolio.
HDFS manages retail credit risk through its credit approval policy and ongoing collection efforts. HDFS uses FICO scores, a standard credit rating measurement, to differentiate the expected default rates of retail credit applicants enabling the Company to better evaluate credit applicants for approval and to tailor pricing according to this assessment. Retail loans with a FICO score of 640 or above at origination are considered prime, and loans with a FICO score below 640 are considered sub-prime. These credit quality indicators are determined at the time of loan origination and are not updated subsequent to the loan origination date.
19
The recorded investment of retail finance receivables, by credit quality indicator, was as follows (in thousands):
July 1, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | June 26, 2011 | ||||||||||
Prime |
$ | 4,181,527 | $ | 4,097,048 | $ | 4,313,863 | ||||||
Sub-prime |
1,044,252 | 990,442 | 1,060,192 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 5,225,779 | $ | 5,087,490 | $ | 5,374,055 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
HDFS credit risk on the wholesale portfolio is different from that of the retail portfolio. Whereas the retail portfolio represents a relatively homogeneous pool of retail finance receivables that exhibit more consistent loss patterns, the wholesale portfolio exposures are less consistent. HDFS utilizes an internal credit risk rating system to manage credit risk exposure consistently across wholesale borrowers and capture credit risk factors for each borrower.
HDFS uses the following internal credit quality indicators, based on the Companys internal risk rating system, listed from highest level of risk to lowest level of risk for the wholesale portfolio: Doubtful, Substandard, Special Mention, Medium Risk and Low Risk. Based upon managements review, the dealers classified in the Doubtful category are the dealers with the greatest likelihood of being charged-off, while the dealers classified as Low Risk are least likely to be charged-off. The internal rating system considers factors such as the specific borrowers ability to repay and the estimated value of any collateral. Dealer risk rating classifications are reviewed and updated on a quarterly basis.
The recorded investment of wholesale finance receivables, by internal credit quality indicator, was as follows (in thousands):
July 1, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | June 26, 2011 | ||||||||||
Doubtful |
$ | 9,467 | $ | 13,048 | $ | 12,386 | ||||||
Substandard |
5,902 | 5,052 | 21,088 | |||||||||
Special Mention |
7,897 | 14,361 | 12,887 | |||||||||
Medium Risk |
808 | 3,032 | 12,861 | |||||||||
Low Risk |
880,964 | 789,147 | 674,567 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 905,038 | $ | 824,640 | $ | 733,789 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Asset-Backed Financing
HDFS participates in asset-backed financing through both term asset-backed securitization transactions and its asset-backed commercial paper conduit facility. In both types of asset-backed financing programs, HDFS transfers U.S. retail motorcycle finance receivables to a consolidated special purpose entity (SPE) while retaining the servicing rights. Each SPE then converts those assets into cash, through the issuance of debt. These SPEs are considered VIEs under U.S. GAAP. HDFS is required to consolidate any VIEs in which it is deemed to be the primary beneficiary through having power over the significant activities of the entity and having an obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE which are potentially significant to the VIE.
HDFS is considered to have power over the significant activities of its term asset-backed securitization and asset-backed commercial paper conduit facility VIEs due to its role as servicer. Servicing fees are typically not considered potentially significant variable interests in a VIE. However, HDFS retains a residual interest in the VIEs in the form of a debt security, which gives HDFS the right to receive benefits that could be potentially significant to the VIE. Therefore, the Company is the primary beneficiary and consolidates all of its VIEs within its consolidated financial statements. Servicing fees paid by VIEs to HDFS are eliminated in consolidation and therefore are not recorded on a consolidated basis.
20
HDFS is not required, and does not currently intend, to provide any additional financial support to its VIEs. Investors and creditors only have recourse to the assets held by the VIEs.
The Companys VIEs have been aggregated on the balance sheet due to the similarity of the nature of the assets involved as well as the purpose and design of the VIEs.
Term Asset-Backed Securitization VIEs
The Company transfers U.S. retail motorcycle finance receivables to SPEs which in turn issue secured notes to investors, with various maturities and interest rates, secured by future collections of the purchased U.S. retail motorcycle finance receivables. Each term asset-backed securitization SPE is a separate legal entity and the U.S. retail motorcycle finance receivables included in each term asset-backed securitization are only available for payment of that secured debt and other obligations arising from the term asset-backed securitization transaction and are not available to pay other obligations or claims of the Companys creditors until the associated secured debt and other obligations are satisfied. Cash and cash equivalent balances held by the SPEs are used only to support the securitizations. There are no amortization schedules for the secured notes; however, the debt is reduced monthly as available collections on the related U.S. retail motorcycle finance receivables are applied to outstanding principal. The secured notes contractual lives have various maturities ranging from 2012 to 2018.
During the second quarter of 2012, the Company issued $89.5 million of secured notes through the sale of notes that had been previously retained as part of certain 2009 and 2011 term asset-backed securitization transactions. These notes were sold at a premium, which will be recognized over the term of the notes. At July 1, 2012, the unaccreted premium associated with these notes was $1.8 million. There was no additional term-asset backed securitization activity during the six months ended July 1, 2012. There were no term-asset backed securitization transactions during the six months ended June 26, 2011.
The following table presents the assets and liabilities of the consolidated term asset-backed securitization SPEs that were included in the Companys financial statements (in thousands):
July 1, | December 31, | June 26, | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||
Finance receivables |
$ | 2,082,375 | $ | 2,916,219 | $ | 2,554,758 | ||||||
Allowance for credit losses |
(41,781 | ) | (65,735 | ) | (61,642 | ) | ||||||
Restricted cash |
187,782 | 228,776 | 242,618 | |||||||||
Other assets |
4,243 | 6,772 | 7,594 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,232,619 | $ | 3,086,032 | $ | 2,743,328 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Liabilities |
||||||||||||
Term asset-backed securitization debt |
$ | 1,339,232 | $ | 2,087,346 | $ | 1,853,382 |
Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Conduit Facility VIE
On September 9, 2011, the Company amended and restated its third-party bank sponsored asset-backed commercial paper conduit facility which provides for a total aggregate commitment of $600.0 million based on, among other things, the amount of eligible U.S. retail motorcycle loans held by the SPE as collateral. The amended agreement has terms similar to the prior agreement and is for the same amount. Under the facility, HDFS may transfer U.S. retail motorcycle finance receivables to a SPE, which in turn may issue debt to third-party bank-sponsored asset-backed commercial paper conduits. The assets of the SPE are restricted as collateral for the payment of the debt or other obligations arising in the transaction and are not available to pay other obligations or claims of the Companys creditors. The terms for this debt provide for interest on the outstanding principal based on prevailing commercial paper rates, or LIBOR plus a specified margin to the extent the advance is not funded by a conduit lender through the issuance of commercial paper. The conduit facility also provides for
21
an unused commitment fee based on the unused portion of the total aggregate commitment of $600.0 million. There is no amortization schedule; however, the debt is reduced monthly as available collections on the related finance receivables are applied to outstanding principal. Upon expiration of the conduit facility, any outstanding principal will continue to be reduced monthly through available collections. Unless earlier terminated or extended by mutual agreement of HDFS and the lenders, the conduit facility has an expiration date of September 7, 2012.
The following table presents the assets of the asset-backed commercial paper conduit facility SPEs that were included in our financial statements (in thousands);
July 1, | December 31, | June 26, | ||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2011 | ||||||||||
Finance receivables |
$ | 8,403 | $ | 13,455 | $ | 19,747 | ||||||
Allowance for credit losses |
(168 | ) | (302 | ) | (475 | ) | ||||||
Restricted cash |
782 | 879 | 1,443 | |||||||||
Other assets |
158 | 449 | 288 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total assets |
$ | 9,175 | $ | 14,481 | $ | 21,003 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The SPEs had no borrowings outstanding under the conduit facility at July 1, 2012, December 31, 2011 or June 26, 2011, therefore, these assets are restricted as collateral for the payment of fees associated with the unused portion of the total aggregate commitment of $600.0 million.
8. Fair Value Measurements
Certain assets and liabilities are recorded at fair value in the financial statements; some of these are measured on a recurring basis while others are measured on a non-recurring basis. Assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis are those that are adjusted to fair value each time a financial statement is prepared. Assets and liabilities measured on a non-recurring basis are those that are adjusted to fair value when a significant event occurs. In determining fair value of assets and liabilities, the Company uses various valuation techniques. The availability of inputs observable in the market varies from instrument to instrument and depends on a variety of factors including the type of instrument, whether the instrument is actively traded, and other characteristics particular to the transaction. For many financial instruments, pricing inputs are readily observable in the market, the valuation methodology used is widely accepted by market participants, and the valuation does not require significant management discretion. For other financial instruments, pricing inputs are less observable in the market and may require management judgment.
The Company assesses the inputs used to measure fair value using a three-tier hierarchy. The hierarchy indicates the extent to which inputs used in measuring fair value are observable in the market. Level 1 inputs include quoted prices for identical instruments and are the most observable. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and observable inputs such as interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity rates and yield curves. The Company uses the market approach to derive the fair value for its level 2 fair value measurements. Foreign currency exchange contracts are valued using publicly quoted spot and forward prices; commodity contracts are valued using publicly quoted prices, where available, or dealer quotes; interest rate swaps are valued using publicized swap curves; and investments in marketable debt and equity securities are valued using publicly quoted prices.
Level 3 inputs are not observable in the market and include managements judgments about the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. The use of observable and unobservable inputs is reflected in the hierarchy assessment disclosed in the following tables.
22
Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The following tables present information about the Companys assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
July 1, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Significant | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Active Markets for | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Balance as of | Identical Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
July 1, 2012 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents |
$ | 764,147 | $ | 764,147 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Marketable securities |
135,848 | | 135,848 | | ||||||||||||
Derivatives |
8,879 | | 8,879 | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 908,874 | $ | 764,147 | $ | 144,727 | $ | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Derivatives |
$ | 2,042 | $ | | $ | 2,042 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Significant | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Active Markets for | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Balance as of | Identical Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents |
$ | 1,302,367 | $ | 1,302,367 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Marketable securities |
153,380 | | 153,380 | | ||||||||||||
Derivatives |
16,443 | | 16,443 | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 1,472,190 | $ | 1,302,367 | $ | 169,823 | $ | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Derivatives |
$ | 5,136 | $ | | $ | 5,136 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
June 26, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Significant | ||||||||||||||||
Quoted Prices in | Other | Significant | ||||||||||||||
Active Markets for | Observable | Unobservable | ||||||||||||||
Balance as of | Identical Assets | Inputs | Inputs | |||||||||||||
June 26, 2011 | (Level 1) | (Level 2) | (Level 3) | |||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash equivalents |
$ | 582,808 | $ | 582,808 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||
Marketable securities |
244,555 | 49,999 | 194,556 | | ||||||||||||
Derivatives |
| | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 827,363 | $ | 632,807 | $ | 194,556 | $ | | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Derivatives |
$ | 14,933 | $ | | $ | 14,933 | $ | | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
9. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Companys financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, trade receivables, finance receivables, net, trade payables, debt, foreign currency contracts and interest rate swaps (derivative instruments are discussed further in Note 10). Under U.S. GAAP, certain of these items are required to be recorded in the financial statements at fair value, while others are required to be recorded at historical cost.
The following table summarizes the fair value and carrying value of the Companys financial instruments (in thousands):
July 1, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | June 26, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value | Carrying Value | Fair Value | Carrying Value | Fair Value | Carrying Value | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 1,071,496 | $ | 1,071,496 | $ | 1,526,950 | $ | 1,526,950 | $ | 973,478 | $ | 973,478 | ||||||||||||
Marketable securities |
$ | 135,848 | $ | 135,848 | $ | 153,380 | $ | 153,380 | $ | 244,555 | $ | 244,555 | ||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
$ | 250,268 | $ | 250,268 | $ | 219,039 | $ | 219,039 | $ | 265,663 | $ | 265,663 | ||||||||||||
Derivatives |
$ | 8,879 | $ | 8,879 | $ | 16,443 | $ | 16,443 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||
Finance receivables, net |
$ | 6,099,619 | $ | 6,016,569 | $ | 5,888,040 | $ | 5,786,681 | $ | 6,052,156 | $ | 5,963,440 | ||||||||||||
Restricted cash held by variable interest entities |
$ | 188,564 | $ | 188,564 | $ | 229,655 | $ | 229,655 | $ | 244,060 | $ | 244,060 | ||||||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 252,239 | $ | 252,239 | $ | 255,713 | $ | 255,713 | $ | 277,395 | $ | 277,395 | ||||||||||||
Derivatives |
$ | 2,042 | $ | 2,042 | $ | 5,136 | $ | 5,136 | $ | 14,933 | $ | 14,933 | ||||||||||||
Unsecured commercial paper |
$ | 845,868 | $ | 845,868 | $ | 874,286 | $ | 874,286 | $ | 735,737 | $ | 735,737 | ||||||||||||
Credit facilities |
$ | 143,792 | $ | 143,792 | $ | 159,794 | $ | 159,794 | $ | 201,112 | $ | 201,112 | ||||||||||||
Medium-term notes |
$ | 2,967,112 | $ | 2,698,359 | $ | 2,561,458 | $ | 2,298,193 | $ | 2,555,926 | $ | 2,347,750 | ||||||||||||
Senior unsecured notes |
$ | 360,791 | $ | 303,000 | $ | 376,513 | $ | 303,000 | $ | 391,051 | $ | 303,000 | ||||||||||||
Term asset-backed securitization debt |
$ | 1,345,452 | $ | 1,339,232 | $ | 2,099,060 | $ | 2,087,346 | $ | 1,883,465 | $ | 1,853,382 |
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Restricted Cash, Accounts Receivable, Net and Accounts Payable With the exception of certain money-market investments, these items are recorded in the financial statements at historical cost. The historical cost basis for these amounts is estimated to approximate their respective fair values due to the short maturity of these instruments.
Marketable Securities Marketable securities are recorded in the financial statements at fair value. The fair value of marketable securities is based primarily on quoted market prices of similar financial assets. Changes in fair value are recorded, net of tax, as other comprehensive income and included as a component of shareholders equity. Fair Value is based on Level 1 or Level 2 inputs.
Finance Receivables, Net Finance receivables, net includes finance receivables held for investment, net and restricted finance receivables held by VIEs, net. Retail and wholesale finance receivables are recorded in the financial statements at historical cost less a provision for credit losses. The fair value of retail finance receivables is generally calculated by discounting future cash flows using an estimated discount rate that reflects current credit, interest rate and prepayment risks associated with similar types of instruments. Fair value is determined based on Level 3 inputs. The historical cost basis of wholesale finance receivables approximates fair value because they either are short-term or have interest rates that adjust with changes in market interest rates.
Derivatives Interest rate swaps, foreign currency exchange contracts and commodity contracts are derivative financial instruments and are carried at fair value on the balance sheet. The fair value of interest rate swaps is determined using pricing models that incorporate quoted prices for similar assets and observable inputs such as interest rates and yield curves. The fair value of foreign currency exchange and commodity contracts are determined using publicly quoted prices. Fair value is calculated using Level 2 inputs.
24
Debt Debt is generally recorded in the financial statements at historical cost. The carrying value of debt provided under credit facilities approximates fair value since the interest rates charged under the facilities are tied directly to market rates and fluctuate as market rates change. The carrying value of unsecured commercial paper approximates fair value due to its short maturity. Fair value is calculated using Level 2 inputs.
The fair values of the medium-term notes maturing in December 2012, December 2014, March 2016, March 2017 and June 2018 are estimated based upon rates currently available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. Fair value is calculated using Level 2 inputs.
The fair value of the senior unsecured notes is estimated based upon rates currently available for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities. Fair value is calculated using Level 2 inputs.
The fair value of the debt related to term asset-backed securitization transactions is estimated based on pricing currently available for transactions with similar terms and maturities. Fair value is calculated using Level 2 inputs.
10. Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
The Company is exposed to certain risks such as foreign currency exchange rate risk, interest rate risk and commodity price risk. To reduce its exposure to such risks, the Company selectively uses derivative financial instruments. All derivative transactions are authorized and executed pursuant to regularly reviewed policies and procedures, which prohibit the use of financial instruments for speculative trading purposes.
All derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value (see Note 9). In accordance with ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, the accounting for changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument depends on whether it has been designated and qualifies as part of a hedging relationship and, further, on the type of hedging relationship. Changes in the fair value of derivatives that are designated as fair value hedges, along with the gain or loss on the hedged item, are recorded in current period earnings. For derivative instruments that are designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of gains and losses that result from changes in the fair value of derivative instruments is initially recorded in other comprehensive income (OCI) and subsequently reclassified into earnings when the hedged item affects income. The Company assesses, both at the inception of each hedge and on an on-going basis, whether the derivatives that are used in its hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows of the hedged items. Any ineffective portion is immediately recognized in earnings. No component of a hedging derivative instruments gain or loss is excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. Derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting are recorded at fair value and any changes in fair value are recorded in current period earnings.
The Company sells its products internationally and in most markets those sales are made in the foreign countrys local currency. As a result, the Companys earnings can be affected by fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currency. The Companys most significant foreign currency risk relates to the Euro, the Australian dollar and the Japanese yen. The Company utilizes foreign currency contracts to mitigate the effects of these currencies fluctuations on earnings. The foreign currency contracts are entered into with banks and allow the Company to exchange a specified amount of foreign currency for U.S. dollars at a future date, based on a fixed exchange rate.
The Company utilizes natural gas contracts and diesel fuel contracts to hedge portions of the cost of those commodities consumed in the Companys motorcycle production and distribution operations.
The Companys foreign currency contracts and commodity contracts generally have maturities of less than one year.
The Companys earnings are affected by changes in interest rates. HDFS utilizes interest rate swaps to reduce the impact of fluctuations in interest rates on its unsecured commercial paper by converting a portion from a floating rate basis to a fixed rate basis. HDFS also entered into derivative contracts to facilitate its first quarter 2008 term asset-backed securitization transaction. These derivatives, which hedged assets held by a VIE, did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and expired during 2011. The fair value of HDFSs interest rate swaps is determined using pricing models that incorporate quoted prices for similar assets and observable inputs such as interest rates and yield curves.
25
The following table summarizes the fair value of the Companys derivative financial instruments (in thousands):
July 1, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | June 26, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives Designated As Hedging Instruments Under ASC Topic 815 |
Notional Value |
Asset Fair Value(a) |
Liability Fair Value(b) |
Notional Value |
Asset
Fair Value(a) |
Liability Fair Value(b) |
Notional Value |
Asset Fair Value(a) |
Liability Fair Value(b) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts(c) |
$ | 244,221 | $ | 8,879 | $ | 1,027 | $ | 306,450 | $ | 16,443 | $ | 1,852 | $ | 272,637 | $ | | $ | 9,691 | ||||||||||||||||||
Natural gas contracts(c) |
1,066 | | 33 | 3,915 | | 265 | 2,915 | | 86 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate swapsunsecured commercial paper(c) |
41,600 | | 982 | 102,100 | | 3,020 | 117,500 | | 5,156 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 286,887 | $ | 8,879 | $ | 2,042 | $ | 412,465 | $ | 16,443 | $ | 5,137 | $ | 393,052 | $ | | $ | 14,933 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
July 1, 2012 | December 31, 2011 | June 26, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives Not Designated As Hedging Instruments Under ASC Topic 815 |
Notional Value |
Asset Fair Value(a) |
Liability Fair Value(b) |
Notional Value |
Asset Fair Value(a) |
Liability Fair Value(b) |
Notional Value |
Asset Fair Value(a) |
Liability Fair Value(b) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Disel fuel contracts |
$ | 4,346 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
$ | 4,346 | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Included in other current assets |
(b) | Included in accrued liabilities |
(c) | Derivative designated as a cash flow hedge |
The following tables summarize the amount of gains and losses related to derivative financial instruments designated as cash flow hedges (in thousands):
Amount of Gain/(Loss) Recognized in OCI |
||||||||||||||||
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
Cash Flow Hedges |
July 1, 2012 |
June 26, 2011 |
July 1, 2012 |
June 26, 2011 |
||||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts |
$ | 10,309 | $ | (6,760 | ) | $ | 4,095 | $ | (16,921 | ) | ||||||
Natural gas contracts |
(109 | ) | (227 | ) | (424 | ) | (264 | ) | ||||||||
Interest rate swapsunsecured commercial paper |
(9 | ) | (397 | ) | (24 | ) | (405 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 10,191 | $ | (7,384 | ) | $ | 3,647 | $ | (17,590 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain/(Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income |
||||||||||||||||||||
Three months ended | Six months ended | Expected to be Reclassified | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash Flow Hedges |
July 1, 2012 | June 26, 2011 | July 1, 2012 | June 26, 2011 | Over the Next Twelve Months | |||||||||||||||
Foreign currency contracts(a) |
$ | 9,683 | $ | (14,781 | ) | $ | 12,104 | $ | (20,788 | ) | $ | (5,162 | ) | |||||||
Natural gas contracts(a) |
(337 | ) | (166 | ) | (656 | ) | (424 | ) | 33 | |||||||||||
Interest rate swapsunsecured commercial paper(b) |
(968 | ) | (1,336 | ) | (1,935 | ) | (2,686 | ) | (986 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total |
$ | 8,378 | $ | (16,283 | ) | $ | 9,513 | $ | (23,898 | ) | $ | (6,115 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Gain/(loss) reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) to income is included in cost of goods sold. |
(b) | Gain/(loss) reclassified from AOCI to income is included in financial services interest expense. |
26
For the three and six months ended July 1, 2012 and June 26, 2011, the cash flow hedges were highly effective and, as a result, the amount of hedge ineffectiveness was not material. No amounts were excluded from effectiveness testing.
For the three and six months ended July 1, 2012 and June 26, 2011, there were no gains or losses recognized in income related to derivative financial instruments designated as fair value hedges.
For the three and six months ended July 1, 2012 and June 26, 2011, there were no gains or losses recognized in income related to derivative financial instruments not designated as hedging instruments.
The Company is exposed to credit loss risk in the event of non-performance by counterparties to these derivative financial instruments. Although no assurances can be given, the Company does not expect any of the counterparties to these derivative financial instruments to fail to meet its obligations. To manage credit loss risk, the Company selects counterparties based on credit ratings and, on a quarterly basis, evaluates each hedges net position relative to the counterpartys ability to cover its position.
11. Income Taxes
The Companys 2012 income tax rate for the three and six months ended July 1, 2012 was 35.3% compared to 34.8% for the same periods last year. Prior year was favorably impacted by the Federal research and development credit that expired at the end of 2011.
12. Product Warranty and Safety Recall Campaigns
The Company currently provides a standard two-year limited warranty on all new motorcycles sold worldwide, except for Japan, where the Company currently provides a standard three-year limited warranty on all new motorcycles sold. In addition, the Company started offering a one-year warranty for Parts & Accessories (P&A) in 2012. The warranty coverage for the retail customer generally begins when the product is sold to a retail customer. The Company maintains reserves for future warranty claims using an estimated cost, which is based primarily on historical Company claim information. Additionally, the Company has from time to time initiated certain voluntary safety recall campaigns. The Company reserves for all estimated costs associated with safety recalls in the period that the safety recalls are announced.
Changes in the Companys warranty and safety recall liability were as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | June 26, | July 1, | June 26, | |||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 57,102 | $ | 57,111 | $ | 54,994 | $ | 54,134 | ||||||||
Warranties issued during the period |
17,127 | 12,335 | 32,618 | 23,560 | ||||||||||||
Settlements made during the period |
(18,549 | ) | (12,570 | ) | (33,086 | ) | (22,866 | ) | ||||||||
Recalls and changes to pre-existing warranty liabilities |
12,121 | (1,469 | ) | 13,275 | 579 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 67,801 | $ | 55,407 | $ | 67,801 | $ | 55,407 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The liability for safety recall campaigns was $6.7 million, $10.7 million and $2.9 million as of July 1, 2012, December 31, 2011 and June 26, 2011, respectively.
27
13. Earnings Per Share
The following table sets forth the computation for basic and diluted earnings per share from continuing operations (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | June 26, | July 1, | June 26, | |||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations used in computing basic and diluted earnings per share |
$ | 247,250 | $ | 190,580 | $ | 419,285 | $ | 309,840 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Denominator: |
||||||||||||||||
Denominator for basic earnings per share- weighted-average common shares |
228,838 | 234,336 | 228,914 | 234,086 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securitiesemployee stock compensation plan |
2,085 | 1,832 | 2,190 | 1,958 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Denominator for diluted earnings per share- adjusted weighted-average shares outstanding |
230,923 | 236,168 | 231,104 | 236,044 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Earnings per common share from continuing operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 1.08 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 1.83 | $ | 1.32 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 1.07 | $ | 0.81 | $ | 1.81 | $ | 1.31 |
Outstanding options to purchase 2.1 million and 4.1 million shares of common stock for the three months ended July 1, 2012 and June 26, 2011, respectively, and 2.3 million and 3.7 million shares of common stock for the six months ended July 1, 2012 and June 26, 2011, respectively, were not included in the Companys computation of dilutive securities because the exercise price was greater than the market price and therefore the effect would have been anti-dilutive.
The Company has a share-based compensation plan under which employees may be granted share-based awards including shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units (RSUs). Non-forfeitable dividends are paid on unvested shares of restricted stock and non-forfeitable dividend equivalents are paid on unvested RSUs. As such, shares of restricted stock and RSUs are considered participating securities under the two-class method of calculating earnings per share as described in ASC Topic 260, Earnings per Share. The two-class method of calculating earnings per share did not have a material impact on the Companys earnings per share calculation for the three and six month periods ending July 1, 2012 and June 26, 2011, respectively.
28
14. Employee Benefit Plans
The Company has defined benefit pension plans and postretirement healthcare benefit plans, which cover substantially all employees of the Motorcycles segment. The Company also has unfunded supplemental employee retirement plan agreements (SERPA) with certain employees which were instituted to replace benefits lost under the Tax Revenue Reconciliation Act of 1993. Components of net periodic benefit costs were as follows (in thousands):
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | June 26, | July 1, | June 26, | |||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Pension and SERPA Benefits |
||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 8,420 | $ | 9,273 | $ | 16,840 | $ | 18,545 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
20,816 | 20,147 | 41,632 | 40,294 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(29,277 | ) | (26,653 | ) | (58,555 | ) | (53,307 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized: |
||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost |
740 | 745 | 1,479 | 1,489 | ||||||||||||
Net loss |
10,969 | 7,554 | 21,937 | 15,109 | ||||||||||||
Curtailment loss |
| | | 236 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 11,668 | $ | 11,066 | $ | 23,333 | $ | 22,366 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Postretirement Healthcare Benefits |
||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 1,853 | $ | 1,907 | $ | 3,706 | $ | 3,814 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
4,578 | 4,911 | 9,155 | 9,822 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(2,356 | ) | (2,346 | ) | (4,712 | ) | (4,692 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized: |
||||||||||||||||
Prior service credit |
(963 | ) | (969 | ) | (1,927 | ) | (1,938 | ) | ||||||||
Net loss |
1,855 | 1,798 | 3,711 | 3,596 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 4,967 | $ | 5,301 | $ | 9,933 | $ | 10,602 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the first six months of 2012, the Company voluntarily contributed $200.0 million in cash to further fund its pension plans. No additional pension contributions are required in 2012. The Company also voluntarily contributed $200.0 million in cash to further fund its pension plans during the first six months of 2011. The Company expects it will continue to make on-going contributions related to current benefit payments for SERPA and postretirement healthcare plans.
29
15. Business Segments
The Company operates in two business segments: Motorcycles and Financial Services. The Companys reportable segments are strategic business units that offer different products and services. They are managed separately based on the fundamental differences in their operations. Selected segment information is set forth below (in thousands):
Three months ended | Six months ended | |||||||||||||||
July 1, | June 26, | July 1, | June 26, | |||||||||||||
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | |||||||||||||
Motorcycles net revenue |
$ | 1,569,047 | $ | 1,339,744 | $ | 2,842,416 | $ | 2,402,788 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
563,817 | 468,268 | 1,020,327 | 820,134 | ||||||||||||
Selling, administrative and engineering expense |
248,038 | 234,827 | 485,033 | 438,632 | ||||||||||||
Restructuring expense |
6,220 | 13,594 | 17,671 | 36,593 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income from Motorcycles |
309,559 | 219,847 | 517,623 | 344,909 | ||||||||||||
Financial services income |
160,613 | 165,853 | 316,935 | 327,739 | ||||||||||||
Financial services expense |
78,659 | 83,798 | 167,587 | 177,749 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income from Financial Services |
81,954 | 82,055 | 149,348 | 149,990 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 391,513 | $ | 301,092 | $ | 666,971 | $ | 494,899 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. Commitment and Contingencies
The Company is subject to lawsuits and other claims related to environmental, product and other matters. In determining required reserves related to these items, the Company carefully analyzes cases and considers the likelihood of adverse judgments or outcomes, as well as the potential range of possible loss. The required reserves are monitored on an ongoing basis and are updated based on new developments or new information in each matter.
Environmental Protection Agency Notice
In December 2009, the Company received formal, written requests for information from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regarding: (i) certificates of conformity for motorcycle emissions and related designations and labels, (ii) aftermarket parts, and (iii) warranty claims on emissions related components. The Company promptly submitted written responses to the EPAs inquiry and engaged in discussions with the EPA. It is possible that a result of the EPAs investigation will be some form of enforcement action by the EPA that will seek a fine or other relief. However, at this time the Company does not know and cannot reasonably estimate the impact of any remedies the EPA might seek.
York Environmental Matters:
The Company is involved with government agencies and groups of potentially responsible parties in various environmental matters, including a matter involving the cleanup of soil and groundwater contamination at its York, Pennsylvania facility. The York facility was formerly used by the U.S. Navy and AMF prior to the purchase of the York facility by the Company from AMF in 1981. Although the Company is not certain as to the full extent of the environmental contamination at the York facility, it has been working with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection (PADEP) since 1986 in undertaking environmental investigation and remediation activities, including an ongoing site-wide remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS). In January 1995, the Company entered into a settlement agreement (the Agreement) with the Navy. The Agreement calls for the Navy and the Company to contribute amounts into a trust equal to 53% and 47%, respectively, of future costs associated with environmental investigation and remediation activities at the York facility (Response Costs). The trust administers the payment of the Response Costs incurred at the York facility as covered by the Agreement.
30
In February 2002, the Company was advised by the EPA that it considers some of the Companys remediation activities at the York facility to be subject to the EPAs corrective action program under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and offered the Company the option of addressing corrective action under a RCRA facility lead agreement. In July 2005, the York facility was designated as the first site in Pennsylvania to be addressed under the One Cleanup Program. The program provides a more streamlined and efficient oversight of voluntary remediation by both PADEP and EPA and will be carried out consistent with the Agreement with the Navy. As a result, the RCRA facility lead agreement has been superseded.
The Company estimates that its share of the future Response Costs at the York facility will be approximately $2.3 million and has established a reserve for this amount which is included in accrued liabilities in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As noted above, the RI/FS is still underway and given the uncertainty that exists concerning the nature and scope of additional environmental investigation and remediation that may ultimately be required under the RI/FS or otherwise at the York facility, we are unable to make a reasonable estimate of those additional costs, if any, that may result.
The estimate of the Companys future Response Costs that will be incurred at the York facility is based on reports of independent environmental consultants retained by the Company, the actual costs incurred to date and the estimated costs to complete the necessary investigation and remediation activities. Response Costs related to the remediation of soil are expected to be incurred primarily over a period of several years ending in 2015. Response Costs related to ground water remediation may continue for some time beyond 2015.
Product Liability Matters:
Additionally, the Company is involved in product liability suits related to the operation of its business. The Company accrues for claim exposures that are probable of occurrence and can be reasonably estimated. The Company also maintains insurance coverage for product liability exposures. The Company believes that its accruals and insurance coverage are adequate and that product liability will not have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial statements.
17. Supplemental Consolidating Data
The supplemental consolidating data for the periods noted is presented for informational purposes. The supplemental consolidating data may be different than segment information presented elsewhere due to the allocation of intercompany eliminations to reporting segments. All supplemental data is presented in thousands.
31
Three months ended July 1, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Motorcycles & Related | Financial | |||||||||||||||
Products Operations | Services Operations | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Motorcycles and related products |
$ | 1,572,003 | $ | | $ | (2,956 | ) | $ | 1,569,047 | |||||||
Financial services |
| 160,843 | (230 | ) | 160,613 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenue |
1,572,003 | 160,843 | (3,186 | ) | 1,729,660 | |||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Motorcycles and related products cost of goods sold |
1,005,230 | | | 1,005,230 | ||||||||||||
Financial services interest expense |
| 48,712 | | 48,712 | ||||||||||||
Financial services provision for credit losses |
| (5,259 | ) | | (5,259 | ) | ||||||||||
Selling, administrative and engineering expense |
248,268 | 38,162 | (3,186 | ) | 283,244 | |||||||||||
Restructuring expense |
6,220 | | | 6,220 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
1,259,718 | 81,615 | (3,186 | ) | 1,338,147 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income |
312,285 | 79,228 | | 391,513 | ||||||||||||
Investment income |
2,231 | | | 2,231 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
11,595 | | | 11,595 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
302,921 | 79,228 | | 382,149 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
106,377 | 28,522 | | 134,899 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
196,544 | 50,706 | | 247,250 | ||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 196,544 | $ | 50,706 | $ | | $ | 247,250 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Six months ended July 1, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Motorcycles & Related | Financial | |||||||||||||||
Products Operations | Services Operations | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Motorcycles and related products |
$ | 2,847,786 | $ | | $ | (5,370 | ) | $ | 2,842,416 | |||||||
Financial services |
| 316,749 | 186 | 316,935 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenue |
2,847,786 | 316,749 | (5,184 | ) | 3,159,351 | |||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Motorcycles and related products cost of goods sold |
1,822,089 | | | 1,822,089 | ||||||||||||
Financial services interest expense |
| 99,968 | | 99,968 | ||||||||||||
Financial services provision for credit losses |
| 3,754 | | 3,754 | ||||||||||||
Selling, administrative and engineering expense |
484,847 | 69,235 | (5,184 | ) | 548,898 | |||||||||||
Restructuring expense |
17,671 | | | 17,671 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
2,324,607 | 172,957 | (5,184 | ) | 2,492,380 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income |
523,179 | 143,792 | | 666,971 | ||||||||||||
Investment income |
229,164 | | (225,000 | ) | 4,164 | |||||||||||
Interest expense |
23,090 | | | 23,090 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
729,253 | 143,792 | (225,000 | ) | 648,045 | |||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
176,995 | 51,765 | | 228,760 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
552,258 | 92,027 | (225,000 | ) | 419,285 | |||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 552,258 | $ | 92,027 | $ | (225,000 | ) | $ | 419,285 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Three months ended June 26, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Motorcycles & Related | Financial | |||||||||||||||
Products Operations | Services Operations | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Motorcycles and related products |
$ | 1,342,803 | $ | | $ | (3,059 | ) | $ | 1,339,744 | |||||||
Financial services |
| 166,518 | (665 | ) | 165,853 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenue |
1,342,803 | 166,518 | (3,724 | ) | 1,505,597 | |||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Motorcycles and related products cost of goods sold |
871,476 | | | 871,476 | ||||||||||||
Financial services interest expense |
| 56,991 | | 56,991 | ||||||||||||
Financial services provision for credit losses |
| (6,790 | ) | | (6,790 | ) | ||||||||||
Selling, administrative and engineering expense |
235,492 | 36,656 | (3,724 | ) | 268,424 | |||||||||||
Restructuring expense |
13,594 | | | 13,594 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
1,120,562 | 86,857 | (3,724 | ) | 1,203,695 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income |
222,241 | 79,661 | | 301,902 | ||||||||||||
Investment income |
1,748 | | | 1,748 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
11,350 | | | 11,350 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
212,639 | 79,661 | | 292,300 | ||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
73,042 | 28,678 | | 101,720 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
139,597 | 50,983 | | 190,580 | ||||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 139,597 | $ | 50,983 | $ | | $ | 190,580 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Six months ended June 26, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Motorcycles & Related | Financial | |||||||||||||||
Products Operations | Services Operations | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||
Revenue: |
||||||||||||||||
Motorcycles and related products |
$ | 2,408,293 | $ | | $ | (5,505 | ) | $ | 2,402,788 | |||||||
Financial services |
| 328,270 | (531 | ) | 327,739 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total revenue |
2,408,293 | 328,270 | (6,036 | ) | 2,730,527 | |||||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Motorcycles and related products cost of goods sold |
1,582,654 | | | 1,582,654 | ||||||||||||
Financial services interest expense |
| 115,026 | | 115,026 | ||||||||||||
Financial services provision for credit losses |
| (1,184 | ) | | (1,184 | ) | ||||||||||
Selling, administrative and engineering expense |
439,163 | 69,412 | (6,036 | ) | 502,539 | |||||||||||
Restructuring expense |
36,593 | | | 36,593 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
2,058,410 | 183,254 | (6,036 | ) | 2,235,628 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income |
349,883 | 145,016 | | 494,899 | ||||||||||||
Investment income |
128,146 | | (125,000 | ) | 3,146 | |||||||||||
Interest expense |
22,831 | | | 22,831 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before provision for income taxes |
455,198 | 145,016 | (125,000 | ) | 475,214 | |||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
113,168 | 52,206 | | 165,374 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
342,030 | 92,810 | (125,000 | ) | 309,840 | |||||||||||
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax |
| | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 342,030 | $ | 92,810 | $ | (125,000 | ) | $ | 309,840 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
July 1, 2012 | ||||||||||||||||
Motorcycles & Related Products Operations |
Financial Services Operations |
Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 725,909 | $ | 345,587 | $ | | $ | 1,071,496 | ||||||||
Marketable securities |
135,848 | | | 135,848 | ||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
885,797 | | (635,529 | ) | 250,268 | |||||||||||
Finance receivables, net |
| 1,398,553 | | 1,398,553 | ||||||||||||
Restricted finance receivables held by variable interest entities, net |
| 456,285 | | 456,285 | ||||||||||||
Inventories |
323,046 | | | 323,046 | ||||||||||||
Restricted cash held by variable interest entities |
| 188,564 | | 188,564 | ||||||||||||
Other current assets |
182,464 | 63,343 | | 245,807 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total current assets |
2,253,064 | 2,452,332 | (635,529 | ) | 4,069,867 | |||||||||||
Finance receivables, net |
| 2,569,187 | | 2,569,187 | ||||||||||||
Restricted finance receivables held by variable interest entities, net |
| 1,592,544 | | 1,592,544 | ||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
747,133 | 29,660 | | 776,793 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill |
28,604 | | | 28,604 | ||||||||||||
Other long-term assets |
335,811 | 17,956 | (73,978 | ) | 279,789 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 3,364,612 | $ | 6,661,679 | $ | (709,507 | ) | $ | 9,316,784 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 197,891 | $ | 689,877 | $ | (635,529 | ) | $ | 252,239 | |||||||
Accrued liabilities |
466,808 | 71,756 | (3,467 | ) | 535,097 | |||||||||||
Short-term debt |
| 845,868 | | 845,868 | ||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
| 399,962 | 399,962 | |||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt held by variable interest entities |
| 507,427 | | 507,427 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total current liabilities |
664,699 | 2,514,890 | (638,996 | ) | 2,540,593 | |||||||||||
Long-term debt |
303,000 | 2,442,189 | | 2,745,189 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt held by variable interest entities |
| 831,805 | | 831,805 | ||||||||||||
Pension liability |
122,496 | | | 122,496 | ||||||||||||
Postretirement healthcare benefits |
263,295 | | | 263,295 | ||||||||||||
Other long-term liabilities |
131,754 | 15,265 | | 147,019 | ||||||||||||
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17) |
||||||||||||||||
Total shareholders equity |
1,879,368 | 857,530 | (70,511 | ) | 2,666,387 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 3,364,612 | $ | 6,661,679 | $ | (709,507 | ) | $ | 9,316,784 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
December 31, 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
Motorcycles & Related | Financial | |||||||||||||||
Products Operations | Services Operations | Eliminations | Consolidated | |||||||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 943,330 | $ | 583,620 | $ | | $ | 1,526,950 | ||||||||
Marketable securities |
153,380 | | | 153,380 | ||||||||||||
Accounts receivable, net |
393,615 | | (174,576 | ) | 219,039 | |||||||||||
Finance receivables, net |
| 1,168,603 | | 1,168,603 | ||||||||||||
Restricted finance receivables held by variable interest entities, net |
| 591,864 | | 591,864 | ||||||||||||
Inventories |
418,006 | | | 418,006 | ||||||||||||
Restricted cash held by variable interest entities |
| 229,655 | | 229,655 | ||||||||||||
Other current assets |
167,423 | 67,286 | | 234,709 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total current assets |
2,075,754 | 2,641,028 | (174,576 | ) | 4,542,206 | |||||||||||
Finance receivables, net |
| 1,754,441 | | 1,754,441 | ||||||||||||
Restricted finance receivables held by variable interest entities, net |
| 2,271,773 | | 2,271,773 | ||||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
779,330 | 30,129 | | 809,459 | ||||||||||||
Goodwill |
29,081 | | | 29,081 | ||||||||||||
Other long-term assets |
322,379 | 17,460 | (72,635 | ) | 267,204 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
$ | 3,206,544 | $ | 6,714,831 | $ | (247,211 | ) | $ | 9,674,164 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 220,957 | $ | 209,332 | $ | (174,576 | ) | $ | 255,713 | |||||||
Accrued liabilities |
482,838 | 85,038 | (3,704 | ) | 564,172 | |||||||||||
Short-term debt |
| 838,486 | | 838,486 | ||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
| 399,916 | 399,916 | |||||||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt held by variable interest entities |
| 640,331 | | 640,331 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total current liabilities |
703,795 | 2,173,103 | (178,280 | ) | 2,698,618 | |||||||||||
Long-term debt |
303,000 | 2,093,871 | | 2,396,871 | ||||||||||||
Long-term debt held by variable interest entities |
| 1,447,015 | | 1,447,015 | ||||||||||||
Pension liability |
302,483 | | | 302,483 | ||||||||||||
Postretirement healthcare benefits |
268,582 | | |