Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2008
or
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 1-584
FERRO CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Ohio
|
|
34-0217820 |
(State of Corporation)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
1000 Lakeside Avenue
|
|
44114 |
Cleveland, OH
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(Address of Principal executive offices) |
|
|
216-641-8580
(Telephone Number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES þ NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Act). YES o NO þ
At
July 31, 2008, there were 43,719,321 shares of Ferro Common Stock, par value $1.00, outstanding.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
Ferro Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
650,396 |
|
|
$ |
553,658 |
|
|
$ |
1,257,652 |
|
|
$ |
1,083,363 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
527,012 |
|
|
|
446,131 |
|
|
|
1,020,949 |
|
|
|
869,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
123,384 |
|
|
|
107,527 |
|
|
|
236,703 |
|
|
|
214,307 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
81,191 |
|
|
|
84,386 |
|
|
|
159,848 |
|
|
|
163,143 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
9,031 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
13,238 |
|
|
|
1,863 |
|
Other expense (income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
13,214 |
|
|
|
14,286 |
|
|
|
27,243 |
|
|
|
31,732 |
|
Interest earned |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
(1,154 |
) |
Foreign currency losses (gains), net |
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
(891 |
) |
|
|
934 |
|
Miscellaneous expense (income), net |
|
|
2,082 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
3,932 |
|
|
|
(386 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
17,358 |
|
|
|
7,406 |
|
|
|
33,604 |
|
|
|
18,175 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
8,002 |
|
|
|
2,808 |
|
|
|
15,083 |
|
|
|
7,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
9,356 |
|
|
|
4,598 |
|
|
|
18,521 |
|
|
|
10,833 |
|
(Gain) loss from discontinued operations,
net of tax |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
9,365 |
|
|
|
4,540 |
|
|
|
18,505 |
|
|
|
10,619 |
|
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
9,142 |
|
|
$ |
4,281 |
|
|
$ |
18,055 |
|
|
$ |
10,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
From discontinued operations |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
From continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
From discontinued operations |
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
0.00 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared |
|
$ |
0.145 |
|
|
$ |
0.145 |
|
|
$ |
0.290 |
|
|
$ |
0.290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
Ferro Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
ASSETS |
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
13,390 |
|
|
$ |
12,025 |
|
Accounts and trade notes receivable, net |
|
|
281,858 |
|
|
|
245,369 |
|
Note receivable from Ferro Finance Corporation |
|
|
28,442 |
|
|
|
29,577 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
316,783 |
|
|
|
262,799 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
24,454 |
|
|
|
15,764 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
47,516 |
|
|
|
33,419 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
6,332 |
|
|
|
8,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
718,775 |
|
|
|
607,192 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
534,761 |
|
|
|
519,959 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
290,340 |
|
|
|
291,070 |
|
Amortizable intangible assets, net |
|
|
8,864 |
|
|
|
9,071 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
106,415 |
|
|
|
100,935 |
|
Other non-current assets |
|
|
111,779 |
|
|
|
110,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,770,934 |
|
|
$ |
1,638,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans payable and current portion of long-term debt |
|
$ |
9,163 |
|
|
$ |
5,444 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
293,539 |
|
|
|
269,591 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
27,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued payrolls |
|
|
33,157 |
|
|
|
26,415 |
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
|
|
103,482 |
|
|
|
108,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
467,168 |
|
|
|
410,332 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
561,790 |
|
|
|
520,645 |
|
Postretirement and pension liabilities |
|
|
143,404 |
|
|
|
140,988 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
12,542 |
|
|
|
9,848 |
|
Other non-current liabilities |
|
|
57,862 |
|
|
|
56,644 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,242,766 |
|
|
|
1,138,457 |
|
Minority interests |
|
|
9,988 |
|
|
|
9,896 |
|
Series A convertible preferred stock (approximates redemption value) |
|
|
12,764 |
|
|
|
13,623 |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
52,323 |
|
|
|
52,323 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
165,968 |
|
|
|
166,391 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
473,154 |
|
|
|
468,190 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
14,495 |
|
|
|
(7,765 |
) |
Common shares in treasury, at cost |
|
|
(200,524 |
) |
|
|
(202,855 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
505,416 |
|
|
|
476,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
1,770,934 |
|
|
$ |
1,638,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
Ferro Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Shareholders Equity and Comprehensive Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Share- |
|
|
|
in Treasury |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
holders |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balances at December 31, 2007 |
|
|
8,753 |
|
|
$ |
(202,855 |
) |
|
$ |
52,323 |
|
|
$ |
166,391 |
|
|
$ |
468,190 |
|
|
$ |
(7,765 |
) |
|
$ |
476,284 |
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,505 |
|
Other comprehensive income,
net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation
adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,247 |
|
|
|
21,247 |
|
Postretirement benefit liability
adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(414 |
) |
|
|
(414 |
) |
Raw material commodity
swap adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
Interest rate swap adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,399 |
|
Cash dividends: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,586 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,586 |
) |
Preferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(450 |
) |
Income tax benefits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
Stock-based compensation
transactions |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
2,331 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(444 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,887 |
|
Adjustment to initially apply FAS
No. 158 as of January 1, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(505 |
) |
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
8,604 |
|
|
$ |
(200,524 |
) |
|
$ |
52,323 |
|
|
$ |
165,968 |
|
|
$ |
473,154 |
|
|
$ |
14,495 |
|
|
$ |
505,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
Ferro Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
18,505 |
|
|
$ |
10,619 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
38,244 |
|
|
|
43,992 |
|
Precious metals deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,073 |
|
Accounts and trade notes receivable, inventories, and accounts payable |
|
|
(55,550 |
) |
|
|
(26,190 |
) |
Note receivable from Ferro Finance Corporation |
|
|
1,135 |
|
|
|
(14,116 |
) |
Other changes in current assets and liabilities, net |
|
|
14,394 |
|
|
|
(7,367 |
) |
Other adjustments, net |
|
|
(10,019 |
) |
|
|
(7,149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by continuing operations |
|
|
6,709 |
|
|
|
69,862 |
|
Net cash used for discontinued operations |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
6,693 |
|
|
|
69,817 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(34,572 |
) |
|
|
(30,921 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of assets and businesses |
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
1,964 |
|
Dividends received from affiliates |
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(33,926 |
) |
|
|
(28,098 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings (repayments) under short-term facilities |
|
|
3,478 |
|
|
|
10,850 |
|
Proceeds from revolving credit facility |
|
|
430,347 |
|
|
|
410,295 |
|
Proceeds from term loan facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000 |
|
Principal payments on revolving credit facility |
|
|
(380,074 |
) |
|
|
(507,649 |
) |
Principal payments on term loan facility |
|
|
(7,927 |
) |
|
|
(1,525 |
) |
Debt issue costs paid |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,086 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,233 |
|
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(13,036 |
) |
|
|
(13,041 |
) |
Other financing activities |
|
|
(4,238 |
) |
|
|
(1,325 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities |
|
|
28,550 |
|
|
|
(41,248 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,365 |
|
|
|
810 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
12,025 |
|
|
|
16,985 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
13,390 |
|
|
$ |
17,795 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
$ |
26,493 |
|
|
$ |
28,680 |
|
Income taxes |
|
$ |
5,243 |
|
|
$ |
6,774 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
Ferro Corporation and Consolidated Subsidiaries
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Basis of Presentation
Ferro Corporation (Ferro, we, us or the Company) prepared these unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements of Ferro Corporation and its consolidated subsidiaries in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S.
GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of
Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by
U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements and, therefore, should be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2007. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S.
GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the timing and amount of assets,
liabilities, equity, revenues and expenses reported and disclosed. Actual amounts could differ
from our estimates, resulting in changes in revenues or costs that could have a material impact on
the Companys results of operations, financial position, or cash flows. In our opinion, we made
all adjustments that are necessary for a fair presentation, and those adjustments are of a normal
recurring nature unless otherwise noted. Due to differing business conditions, our various
initiatives, and some seasonality, the results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008,
are not necessarily indicative of the results expected in subsequent quarters or for the full year.
2. Accounting Standards Adopted in the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
On January 1, 2008, we adopted FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, (FAS No.
157), FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement
No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of
Lease Classification or Measurement Under Statement 13, (FSP No. FAS 157-1), and FASB Staff
Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, (FSP No. FAS 157-2). FAS No.
157 defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance regarding the methods used for
measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements, but does not require
any new fair value measurements. FSP No. FAS 157-1 excludes FASB Statement No. 13, Accounting for
Leases, (FAS No. 13) as well as other accounting pronouncements that address fair value
measurement on lease classification or measurement under FAS No. 13 from the scope of FAS No. 157.
FSP No. FAS 157-2 delays the effective date of FAS No. 157 for all nonrecurring fair value
measurements of nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities until fiscal years beginning after
November 15, 2008. The portions of these pronouncements that were not delayed were adopted
prospectively, and their adoption reduced the disclosed fair value of our borrowings under the
revolving credit and term loan facilities and reduced the carrying value of our interest rate
swaps. We are currently evaluating the impact on our consolidated financial statements of adopting
the deferred portions of these pronouncements on January 1, 2009.
On January 1, 2008, we adopted the measurement provisions of FASB Statement No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of
FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R), (FAS No. 158). The measurement provisions require
companies to measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the annual balance sheet
date. Previously, we used September 30 as the measurement date for U.S. pension and other
postretirement benefits. We have elected to use the September 30, 2007, measurement of assets and
benefit obligations to calculate the fiscal year 2008 expense. Expense for the gap period from
September 30 to December 31 is recognized as of January 1, 2008, as a charge of $0.5 million, net
of tax, to retained earnings and a credit of $0.4 million, net of tax, to accumulated other
comprehensive income.
On January 1, 2008, we adopted FASB Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, (FAS No.
159). This statement permits us to choose, at specified election dates, to measure eligible items
at fair value (the fair value option). For items for which the fair value option has been
elected, we would report unrealized gains and losses in earnings at each subsequent reporting date
and recognize up-front costs and fees in earnings as incurred. We have not elected to measure any
eligible items at fair value, and we do not have any current plans to do so. Therefore, adoption
of FAS No. 159 did not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements.
7
On January 1, 2008, we adopted Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 06-11, Accounting for
Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards, (EITF No. 06-11). EITF No. 06-11
requires that the income tax benefit from
dividends that are charged to retained earnings and paid to employees for nonvested equity
shares be recognized as an increase to paid-in capital. Previously, we recognized this income tax
benefit as an increase to retained earnings. Beginning in 2008, we report this income tax benefit
as an increase to paid-in capital.
3. Newly Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(R), Business Combinations, (FAS No.
141(R)) and Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an
amendment of ARB No. 51, (FAS No. 160). These statements change the way that companies account
for business combinations and noncontrolling interests (e.g., minority interests). Both standards
are to be applied prospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. However, FAS
No. 160 requires entities to apply the presentation and disclosure requirements retrospectively to
comparative financial statements. In 2009, we will retrospectively reclassify the amount of
minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries to equity and separately report the amount of net
income or loss attributable to minority interests.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, (FAS No. 161). This Statement
requires enhanced disclosures about an entitys derivative and hedging activities. This Statement
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. This Statement encourages, but does not
require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. We do not expect the
adoption of FAS No. 161 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life
of Intangible Assets, (FSP No. FAS 142-3). This pronouncement amends the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
FSP No. FAS 142-3 is to be applied prospectively and is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. We are
currently evaluating its effect on our financial statements.
4. Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
98,720 |
|
|
$ |
74,659 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
56,163 |
|
|
|
41,640 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
161,900 |
|
|
|
146,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
316,783 |
|
|
$ |
262,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the production of some of our products, we use precious metals, some of which we obtain
from financial institutions under consignment agreements with terms of one year or less. The
financial institutions retain ownership of the precious metals and charge us fees based on the
amounts we consign. These fees were $1.3 million and $1.0 million for the three months ended June
30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $2.3 million and $2.0 million for the six months ended June
30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and were charged to cost of sales. We had on hand $167.0 million
at June 30, 2008, and $148.3 million at December 31, 2007, of precious metals owned by financial
institutions, measured at fair value based on market prices for identical assets.
5. Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment is reported net of accumulated depreciation of $725.7 million at
June 30, 2008, and $713.5 million at December 31, 2007.
8
6. Financing and Long-term Debt
Loans payable and current portion of long-term debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Loans payable to banks |
|
$ |
5,040 |
|
|
$ |
954 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
4,123 |
|
|
|
4,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
9,163 |
|
|
$ |
5,444 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
$200 million Senior Notes, 9.125%, due January 1, 2009 * |
|
$ |
199,818 |
|
|
$ |
199,636 |
|
Revolving credit facility |
|
|
64,130 |
|
|
|
13,857 |
|
Term loan facility |
|
|
294,023 |
|
|
|
301,950 |
|
Capitalized lease obligations |
|
|
7,258 |
|
|
|
8,924 |
|
Other notes |
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
565,913 |
|
|
|
525,135 |
|
Less current portion |
|
|
(4,123 |
) |
|
|
(4,490 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
561,790 |
|
|
$ |
520,645 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Net of unamortized discounts.
Credit Rating
At June 30, 2008, the Companys corporate credit rating was B1, with a positive outlook, by
Moodys Investor Services, Inc. (Moodys) and B+, with a stable outlook, by Standard & Poors
Rating Group (S&P).
Revolving Credit and Term Loan Facilities
In 2006, we entered into an agreement with a group of lenders for a $700 million credit
facility, consisting of a multi-currency senior revolving credit facility and a senior term loan
facility. In 2007, we cancelled the unused portion of the term loan facility and amended the
credit facility (the Amended Credit Facility). At June 30, 2008, the Amended Credit Facility
consisted of a $300 million revolving credit facility, which matures in 2011, and a $305 million
term loan facility, which matures in 2012. As part of the agreement, we can request an increase of
$50 million in the revolving credit facility. We had $227.3 million at June 30, 2008, and $277.5
million at December 31, 2007, available under the revolving credit facility, after reductions for
standby letters of credit secured by this facility. In 2007, we began making periodic principal
payments on the term loans. We are required to make minimum quarterly principal payments of $0.8
million from July 2008 to July 2011. During the last year of the loans life, we are required to
repay the remaining balance of the term loans in four quarterly installments. Currently, those
last four payments will be $71.0 million each. In addition to the minimum quarterly payments, each
April we may be required to make an additional principal payment. The amount of this additional
payment is dependent on the Companys leverage and certain cash flow metrics. Any additional
payment that is required reduces, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, the amount due in the last four
quarterly payments. In April 2008, we made a term loan principal payment of $7.2 million,
consisting of the $0.8 million minimum quarterly payment and a $6.4 million additional principal
payment.
9
The interest rates under the Amended Credit Facility are equal to the sum of (A) either (1)
LIBOR or (2) the higher of the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% or the Prime Rate and (B) for the
revolving credit facility, a variable margin based on the Companys leverage, or for the term loan
facility, a fixed margin. As part of the 2007 amendments, $175 million of borrowings under the
term loan facility were restricted to using three-month LIBOR in determining their interest rates.
This change was made in connection with interest rate swap agreements executed in 2007. These swap
agreements effectively fixed the interest rate through June 2011 on $150 million of borrowings
under the term loan facility. The average interest rate for revolving credit borrowings was 4.5%
at June 30, 2008, and 6.5% at December 31, 2007, and the effective interest rate for term loan
borrowings after adjusting for the interest rate swaps was 6.1% at June 30, 2008, and 7.2% at
December 31, 2007.
Senior Notes
The senior notes are due January 1, 2009. We continue to classify the senior notes as
noncurrent liabilities, because we have both the intention to refinance them in a way that would
extend their maturity beyond one year and the ability to do so through availability under our
revolving credit facility. The senior notes are redeemable at our option at any time for the
present value of the principal amount then outstanding plus the unpaid interest through maturity.
The senior notes are redeemable at the option of the holders only upon a change in control of the
Company combined with a rating by either Moodys or S&P below investment grade as defined in the
indenture. Currently, the ratings by Moodys and S&P of the senior notes are below investment
grade.
In June 2008, we commenced a cash tender offer to purchase any and all of the senior notes.
We intend to finance the purchase of the senior notes due 2009 and related fees and expenses
primarily through a proposed public offering of $200 million of senior notes due 2016. The exact
terms and timing of the offering will depend upon market conditions and other factors.
Receivable Sales Programs
We have several programs to sell, on an ongoing basis, pools of our trade accounts receivable.
These programs accelerate cash collections at favorable financing costs and help us manage the
Companys liquidity requirements. The costs associated with these programs are reported as
interest expense and were $3.7 million and $3.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and
2007, respectively.
In our largest program, we sell substantially all of Ferros U.S. trade accounts receivable to
Ferro Finance Corporation (FFC), a wholly-owned unconsolidated qualified special purpose entity
(QSPE). FFC finances its acquisition of trade receivable assets by issuing beneficial interests
in (securitizing) the receivables to multi-seller receivables securitization companies (the
Conduits). In June 2008, we amended the program to reduce the maximum proceeds and the conduits
commitment levels from $100.0 million to $75 million. Ferro had received net proceeds of $75.0
million at June 30, 2008, and $54.6 million at December 31, 2007, for outstanding receivables. FFC
and the Conduits have no recourse to Ferros other assets for failure of debtors to pay when due,
as the assets transferred are legally isolated in accordance with the U.S. bankruptcy laws. Ferro,
on behalf of FFC and the Conduits, provides normal collection and administration services for the
trade accounts receivable sold.
Activity from this program for the six months ended June 30 is detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Trade accounts receivable sold to FFC |
|
$ |
549,362 |
|
|
$ |
497,358 |
|
Cash proceeds from FFC |
|
|
550,369 |
|
|
|
482,838 |
|
Trade accounts receivable collected and remitted to FFC and the conduits |
|
|
529,991 |
|
|
|
482,138 |
|
10
In addition, we maintain several international programs to sell trade accounts receivable,
primarily without recourse. The commitments supporting these programs can be withdrawn at any time
and totaled $87.2 million at June 30, 2008, and $80.8 million at December 31, 2007. Ferro had
received net proceeds under the international programs of $41.2 million at June 30, 2008, and $42.1
million at December 31, 2007, for outstanding receivables. Ferro provides normal collection and
administration services for the trade accounts receivable sold to certain financial institutions.
Activity from these programs for the six months ended June 30 is detailed below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Trade accounts receivable sold to financial institutions |
|
$ |
134,069 |
|
|
$ |
86,985 |
|
Cash proceeds from financial institutions |
|
|
128,921 |
|
|
|
86,113 |
|
Trade accounts receivable collected and remitted to financial institutions
for programs where we provide collection and administrative services |
|
|
42,431 |
|
|
|
42,844 |
|
7. Financial Instruments
The following financial instruments are measured at fair value for disclosure purposes. The
carrying values of these instruments may or may not be their fair values.
Senior Notes. The carrying amount of the senior notes was $199.8 million at June 30, 2008,
and $199.6 million at December 31, 2007. The fair value of the senior notes was $203.5 million at
June 30, 2008, and $205.0 million at December 31, 2007. The fair value of Ferros senior notes is
based on a third partys estimated bid price.
Revolving credit facility. The carrying amount of the revolving credit facility was $64.1
million at June 30, 2008, and $13.9 million at December 31, 2007. The fair value of the revolving
credit facility was $60.0 million at June 30, 2008, and $13.9 million at December 31, 2007. The
fair value of the revolving credit facility is based on the present value of expected future cash
flows and assumptions about current interest rates. Beginning in 2008 in connection with the
adoption of FAS No. 157, the fair value also reflects assumptions about the creditworthiness of the
Company that market participants would use in pricing the debt.
Term loan facility. The carrying amount of the term loan facility was $294.0 million at June
30, 2008, and $302.0 million at December 31, 2007. The fair value of the term loan facility was
$275.5 million at June 30, 2008, and $302.0 million at December 31, 2007. The fair value of the
term loan facility is based on the present value of expected future cash flows and assumptions
about current interest rates. Beginning in 2008 in connection with the adoption of FAS No. 157,
the fair value also reflects assumptions about the creditworthiness of the Company that market
participants would use in pricing the debt.
11
The following financial instruments are measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring
basis. The inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value are classified into the
following categories:
|
|
|
Level 1:
|
|
Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. |
Level 2:
|
|
Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by
market data. |
Level 3:
|
|
Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data. |
The carrying amount, fair value, and classification within the fair value hierarchy of these
financial instruments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
at June 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency forward
contracts |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
Precious metals forward
contracts |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value |
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
57 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
771 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
(7,168 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(7,168 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(8,109 |
) |
Foreign currency forward
contracts |
|
|
(618 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(618 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(284 |
) |
Raw material commodity swaps |
|
|
(1,025 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,025 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,499 |
) |
Precious metals forward
contracts |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value |
|
$ |
(8,821 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(8,821 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(9,892 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps. To reduce our exposure to interest rate changes on variable-rate debt,
we entered into interest rate swap agreements in 2007. These swaps effectively converted $150
million of our variable-rate term loan facility to a fixed rate. We mark these agreements to fair
value and recognize the resulting gains or losses as other comprehensive income or loss. In 2007,
the fair value of the interest rate swaps was based on settlement prices provided by the
counterparties. Beginning in 2008 in connection with the adoption of FAS No. 157, the fair value
of the swaps is based on the present value of expected future cash flows, which reflects
assumptions about current interest rates and the creditworthiness of the Company that market
participants would use in pricing the swaps.
Foreign currency forward contracts. We manage foreign currency risks principally by entering
into forward contracts to mitigate the impact of currency fluctuations on transactions. We mark
these contracts to fair value based on market prices for comparable contracts and recognize the
resulting gains or losses in net foreign currency gains or losses.
Raw material commodity swaps. We hedge a portion of our exposure to changes in the pricing of
certain raw material commodities principally using swap arrangements that allow us to fix the price
of the commodities for future purchases. We mark these contracts to fair value based on market
prices for comparable contracts and recognize the resulting gains or losses as other comprehensive
income or loss. After the contracts mature and the materials are sold, the gains and losses are
recognized as part of cost of sales.
Precious metals forward contracts. We enter into forward purchase arrangements with precious
metals suppliers to completely cover the value of fixed price sales contracts for products with
precious metal content. Some of these agreements, with purchase commitments totaling $18.0 million
at June 30, 2008, are designated as normal purchase contracts and are not
marked to fair value. We mark the remaining precious metal contracts to fair value based on
market prices for comparable contracts and recognize the resulting gains or losses as miscellaneous
income or expense.
12
8. Income Taxes
Income tax expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $15.1 million or 44.9% of
pre-tax income compared with $7.3 million or 40.4% in the prior-year six months ended June 30,
2007. The reasons for the increase in the effective tax rate were a change in the mix of income by
country, loss of a tax holiday and a decrease in the U.S. tax cost on foreign dividends. The
effective tax rate was also impacted by an unfavorable tax decision in Brazil, an increase in the
foreign valuation allowance and favorable adjustments to prior year accruals that in aggregate
totaled $2.2 million.
During the first six months of 2008, we allocated income tax expense (benefit) directly to
shareholders equity for the following items: $0.3 million for raw material commodity swap
adjustments, $0.3 million for interest rate swap adjustments, and $0.2 million for the adjustments
to initially apply FAS No. 158. During the first six months of 2007, we allocated income tax
expense (benefit) directly to shareholders equity for the following items: $0.2 million for
postretirement benefit liability adjustments, $(1.0) million for raw material commodity swap
adjustments, and $(0.5) for interest rate swap adjustments.
The Company conducts business globally, and, as a result, the U.S. parent company and its
subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign
jurisdictions. In the normal course of business, the U.S. parent company and its subsidiaries are
subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world, including Spain, France,
Germany, Netherlands, Italy, Japan, China, Portugal, and the United Kingdom. With few exceptions,
we are not subject to federal, state, local or non-U.S. income tax examinations for years before
2000.
9. Contingent Liabilities
In February 2003, we were requested to produce documents in connection with an investigation
by the United States Department of Justice into possible antitrust violations in the heat
stabilizer industry. In April 2006, we were notified by the Department of Justice that the
Government had closed its investigation and that the Company was relieved of any obligation to
retain documents that were responsive to the Governments earlier document request. Before closing
its investigation, the Department of Justice took no action against the Company or any of its
current or former employees. The Company was previously named as a defendant in several lawsuits
alleging civil damages and requesting injunctive relief relating to the conduct the Government was
investigating and has recently been named in four more indirect purchaser lawsuits related to an
existing lawsuit in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. We entered into a verbal agreement in
June 2007 and a definitive written settlement agreement in July 2007 with the direct purchasers in
one of these class action civil lawsuits related to alleged antitrust violations in the heat
stabilizer industry. The settlement agreement was approved by the United States District Court for
the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in December 2007. Although the Company decided to bring this
matter to a close through settlement, the Company did not admit to any of the alleged violations
and continues to deny any wrongdoing. The Company is vigorously defending the remaining six
indirect purchaser civil actions alleging antitrust violations in the heat stabilizer industry,
which are in their preliminary stages; therefore, we cannot determine the outcomes of these
lawsuits at this time. In December 2006, we filed a lawsuit against the former owner of our heat
stabilizer business seeking indemnification for the defense of these lawsuits and any resulting
payments by the Company. These payments include approximately $6.3 million to the class of direct
purchasers and a plaintiff that opted out of the class of direct purchasers and entered into a
separate settlement agreement with the Company. In April 2008, the United States District Court for
the Northern District of Ohio dismissed our lawsuit, and we have appealed the courts decision to
the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.
There are various other lawsuits and claims pending against the Company and its consolidated
subsidiaries. In our opinion, the ultimate liabilities, if any, and expenses resulting from such
lawsuits and claims will not materially affect the consolidated financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows of the Company.
The Company had bank guarantees and standby letters of credit issued by financial
institutions, which totaled $18.1 million at June 30, 2008, and $17.7 million at December 31, 2007.
These agreements primarily relate to Ferros insurance programs, potential environmental
remediation liabilities, and foreign tax payments. If the Company fails to perform its
obligations, the guarantees and letters of credit may be drawn down by their holders, and we
would be liable to the financial institutions for the amounts drawn.
13
10. Retirement Benefits
Information concerning net periodic benefit costs of our U.S. pension plans (including our
unfunded nonqualified plans), non-U.S. pension plans, and postretirement health care and life
insurance benefit plans for the three months ended June 30 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans |
|
|
Non-U.S. Pension Plans |
|
|
Other Benefit Plans |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Components of net periodic cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
315 |
|
|
$ |
1,557 |
|
|
$ |
1,633 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
152 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
5,177 |
|
|
|
5,029 |
|
|
|
3,040 |
|
|
|
2,318 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(5,663 |
) |
|
|
(5,129 |
) |
|
|
(2,203 |
) |
|
|
(1,837 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
(411 |
) |
|
|
(293 |
) |
Net amortization and deferral |
|
|
624 |
|
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment and settlement effects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
213 |
|
|
$ |
1,727 |
|
|
$ |
2,474 |
|
|
$ |
2,287 |
|
|
$ |
336 |
|
|
$ |
718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Information concerning net periodic benefit costs of our U.S. pension plans (including our
unfunded nonqualified plans), non-U.S. pension plans, and postretirement health care and life
insurance benefit plans for the six months ended June 30 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Pension Plans |
|
|
Non-U.S. Pension Plans |
|
|
Other Benefit Plans |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Components of net periodic cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
$ |
631 |
|
|
$ |
3,058 |
|
|
$ |
3,225 |
|
|
$ |
32 |
|
|
$ |
304 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
10,354 |
|
|
|
10,057 |
|
|
|
5,979 |
|
|
|
4,578 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
1,718 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(11,326 |
) |
|
|
(10,252 |
) |
|
|
(4,336 |
) |
|
|
(3,628 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(822 |
) |
|
|
(586 |
) |
Net amortization and deferral |
|
|
1,248 |
|
|
|
2,949 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Curtailment and settlement effects |
|
|
|
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
426 |
|
|
$ |
3,714 |
|
|
$ |
4,862 |
|
|
$ |
4,516 |
|
|
$ |
672 |
|
|
$ |
1,436 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in net periodic cost is due primarily to restructuring activities related to
closing the Companys Niagara Falls, New York, and Rotterdam, Netherlands, manufacturing
facilities, the freezing of pension benefits at several U.S. plants, and the limiting of
eligibility for retiree medical and life insurance coverage for nonunion employees. In the first
quarter of 2007, we recorded curtailment losses of $0.3 million for pension benefits related to the
Niagara Falls, New York, closing.
14
11. Stock-Based Compensation
The following table contains the total stock-based compensation expense recorded in selling,
general and administrative expense for the six months ended June 30:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Stock options |
|
$ |
1,087 |
|
|
$ |
1,573 |
|
Performance shares |
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
615 |
|
Deferred stock units |
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
Restricted shares |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,348 |
|
|
$ |
2,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table contains information regarding the stock-based compensation as of and for
the six month period ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
Aggregate Grant |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
Average Fair |
|
|
Date Fair Value |
|
|
Service or |
|
|
|
Shares or Units |
|
|
Value per Share |
|
|
of Shares or |
|
|
Performance |
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
or Unit |
|
|
Units Granted |
|
|
Period |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in |
|
|
(In years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock options |
|
|
488,100 |
|
|
$ |
4.18 |
|
|
$ |
2,040 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
Performance shares |
|
|
77,825 |
|
|
|
17.26 |
|
|
|
1,343 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
Deferred stock units |
|
|
34,200 |
|
|
|
16.69 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
Restricted shares |
|
|
92,400 |
|
|
|
17.22 |
|
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
The stock-based compensation transaction in shareholders equity consisted of the following
for the six months ended June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Treasury |
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
324 |
|
|
$ |
1,404 |
|
Performance shares, net |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(804 |
) |
Deferred stock units |
|
|
(32,900 |
) |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
Directors deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(397 |
) |
|
|
397 |
|
Preferred stock conversions |
|
|
(24,070 |
) |
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted shares |
|
|
(92,400 |
) |
|
|
1,804 |
|
|
|
(1,441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(149,334 |
) |
|
$ |
2,331 |
|
|
$ |
(444 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Share Awards
Under the 2006 Long-Term Incentive Plan, the Company may award restricted shares of Ferro
common stock. The restricted shares vest in three years from the date of the award and are
forfeited if the recipients employment terminates, except in the case of death or disability.
During the vesting period, the recipient is not entitled to exercise rights pertaining to the
restricted shares, including the right to vote such shares, and dividends on the restricted shares
are deferred without interest. Following the vesting period, the recipient may not dispose of the
shares for two years, without Ferros prior written consent. The first restricted shares were
awarded in 2008.
15
12. Restructuring and Cost Reduction Programs
During 2008, we continued several restructuring programs across a number of our business
segments with the objectives of leveraging our global scale, realigning and lowering our cost
structure and optimizing capacity utilization. The programs are primarily associated with North
America and Europe. Management continues to evaluate our business, and therefore, there may be
supplemental provisions for new plan initiatives as well as changes in estimates to amounts
previously recorded, as payments are made or actions are completed.
In July 2006, we announced that we were restructuring our European operations, including a
portion of our Performance Coatings and Color and Glass Performance Materials segments. This
program affected operations in Spain, Italy, Portugal, France, and Germany. We expect these
actions to significantly reduce the cost structure of our manufacturing operations. As a result of
these activities, since July 2006, we reduced our workforce by approximately 117 employees and are
evaluating further workforce reductions. Revised total anticipated charges through 2009 amount to
$10.9 million. Charges incurred through 2007 amounted to $9.0 million. Restructuring charges for
the six months ended June 30, 2008, include $1.0 million for employee severance costs and $0.1
million of accrual reversals.
In May 2007, we initiated discussions with representatives of workers at our Rotterdam,
Netherlands, Porcelain Enamel manufacturing site regarding possible restructuring actions. In
September 2007, we reached an agreement with the Rotterdam Works Council. As a result, the Company
will discontinue porcelain enamel frit manufacturing at its Rotterdam facility in 2008 and will
consolidate production at other European facilities. This consolidation will result in the
reduction of 84 employees. Restructuring charges are expected to total $25.8 million with
completion anticipated by the end of the third quarter 2008. During 2007, we recorded $11.8
million in restructuring charges and an additional $0.5 million for inventory write downs included
in cost of sales. During the first half of 2008, we recorded $3.1 million for employee severance
costs, $3.0 million for future minimum lease obligations, and $0.4 million in other costs.
In November 2007, March 2008 and April 2008, we initiated additional restructuring plans for
our Performance Coatings, Color and Glass Performance Materials, Polymer Additives, and Specialty
Plastics segments. These restructuring plans will result in the reduction of approximately 120
employees. Total estimated employee termination charges through 2008 are $6.2 million. During
2007, we recorded total charges of $1.4 million. In the first half of 2008, we recorded $4.0
million of additional restructuring charges.
In February 2008, we announced the closing of a Plastics facility in Aldridge, United Kingdom.
This closure will result in the reduction of 10 employees at the anticipated cost of $1.1 million.
During the first half of 2008, we recorded $0.2 million in severance costs and $0.2 million in
lease termination costs.
In June 2008, we announced the partial closing of a Performance Coatings facility in
Americana, Brazil. This closure will result in the reduction of 67 employees at the anticipated cost
of $1.5 million. During the first half of 2008, we recorded $1.0 million in severance costs and
$0.4 million of asset impairment costs.
We have summarized the activities and accrual balances related to our restructuring and cost
reduction programs below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termination |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits |
|
|
Costs |
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
8,381 |
|
|
$ |
1,560 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
9,941 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
9,110 |
|
|
|
3,689 |
|
|
|
439 |
|
|
|
13,238 |
|
Cash payments |
|
|
(9,563 |
) |
|
|
(523 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,086 |
) |
Currency translation adjustment |
|
|
492 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703 |
|
Non-cash items |
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(439 |
) |
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
8,337 |
|
|
$ |
4,937 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
We expect to make cash payments to settle the remaining liability for employee termination
benefits and other costs primarily within the next twelve months, except where legal or contractual
restrictions prevent us from doing so.
13. Discontinued Operations
Discontinued operations relate to the Powder Coatings, Petroleum Additives and Specialty
Ceramics businesses that we sold in 2002 and 2003. There were no sales or cash flows from
investing or financing activities from discontinued operations in the six months ended June 30,
2008 or 2007. The loss (income) from discontinued operations includes ongoing legal costs and
reserve adjustments directly related to discontinued operations. Discontinued operations resulted
in the following pre-tax losses (income) and related income tax benefits (expense):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Pre-tax (income) losses |
|
$ |
(15 |
) |
|
$ |
95 |
|
|
$ |
26 |
|
|
$ |
351 |
|
Tax (expense) benefits |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of tax (income) losses |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We have continuing environmental remediation obligations that are related to these
divestitures, and we had accrued $3.3 million at June 30, 2008, and $3.3 million at December 31,
2007, for these matters.
17
14. Earnings per Share
Details of the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share are shown below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share amounts) |
|
Basic earnings per share computation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
9,142 |
|
|
$ |
4,281 |
|
|
$ |
18,055 |
|
|
$ |
10,074 |
|
(Subtract) add: (Gain) loss from discontinued
operations |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,133 |
|
|
$ |
4,339 |
|
|
$ |
18,071 |
|
|
$ |
10,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
43,251 |
|
|
|
42,906 |
|
|
|
43,206 |
|
|
|
42,807 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share computation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income available to common shareholders |
|
$ |
9,142 |
|
|
$ |
4,281 |
|
|
$ |
18,055 |
|
|
$ |
10,074 |
|
(Subtract) add: (Gain) loss from discontinued
operations |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
Plus: Convertible preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,133 |
|
|
$ |
4,339 |
|
|
$ |
18,071 |
|
|
$ |
10,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average common shares outstanding |
|
|
43,251 |
|
|
|
42,906 |
|
|
|
43,206 |
|
|
|
42,807 |
|
Assumed conversion of convertible preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed satisfaction of performance share conditions |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Assumed satisfaction of deferred stock unit conditions |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Assumed exercise of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding |
|
|
43,327 |
|
|
|
42,967 |
|
|
|
43,283 |
|
|
|
42,868 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15. Comprehensive Income
The components of comprehensive income were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,365 |
|
|
$ |
4,540 |
|
|
$ |
18,505 |
|
|
$ |
10,619 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
5,842 |
|
|
|
21,247 |
|
|
|
12,742 |
|
Postretirement benefit liability adjustments |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(266 |
) |
|
|
(414 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
Raw material commodity swap adjustments |
|
|
(393 |
) |
|
|
(1,121 |
) |
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
(1,512 |
) |
Interest rate swap adjustments |
|
|
3,209 |
|
|
|
(751 |
) |
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
(751 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
11,860 |
|
|
$ |
8,244 |
|
|
$ |
40,399 |
|
|
$ |
21,095 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
16. Reporting for Segments
The Company has six reportable segments: Performance Coatings, Electronic Materials, Color and
Glass Performance Materials, Polymer Additives, Specialty Plastics and Other Businesses. We have
combined our Tile Coating Systems and Porcelain Enamel business units into one reportable segment,
Performance Coatings, based on their similar economic and operating characteristics. We have also
combined two of our segments, Pharmaceuticals and Fine Chemicals, into one reportable segment,
Other Businesses, because they do not meet the quantitative thresholds for separate disclosure.
The accounting policies of our segments are consistent with those described for our
consolidated financial statements in the summary of significant accounting policies contained in
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. We measure segment income for
internal reporting purposes as income from continuing operations before unallocated corporate
expenses, restructuring charges, other expense (income) items, such as interest expense, and income
tax expense. Unallocated corporate expenses primarily consist of corporate employment costs and
professional services.
Net sales to external customers by segment are presented in the table below. Sales between
segments were not material.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
Performance Coatings |
|
$ |
178,504 |
|
|
$ |
158,501 |
|
|
$ |
339,296 |
|
|
$ |
297,316 |
|
Electronic Materials |
|
|
156,202 |
|
|
|
108,823 |
|
|
|
297,195 |
|
|
|
221,767 |
|
Color and Glass Performance Materials |
|
|
130,230 |
|
|
|
109,920 |
|
|
|
259,070 |
|
|
|
215,620 |
|
Polymer Additives |
|
|
98,715 |
|
|
|
85,160 |
|
|
|
191,026 |
|
|
|
167,673 |
|
Specialty Plastics |
|
|
63,609 |
|
|
|
69,797 |
|
|
|
125,402 |
|
|
|
136,758 |
|
Other Businesses |
|
|
23,136 |
|
|
|
21,457 |
|
|
|
45,663 |
|
|
|
44,229 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
650,396 |
|
|
$ |
553,658 |
|
|
$ |
1,257,652 |
|
|
$ |
1,083,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below are each segments income and reconciliations to income before taxes from continuing
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Coatings |
|
$ |
12,785 |
|
|
$ |
10,815 |
|
|
$ |
22,265 |
|
|
$ |
21,498 |
|
Electronic Materials |
|
|
17,683 |
|
|
|
4,929 |
|
|
|
26,432 |
|
|
|
11,012 |
|
Color and Glass Performance Materials |
|
|
15,547 |
|
|
|
12,668 |
|
|
|
30,983 |
|
|
|
27,735 |
|
Polymer Additives |
|
|
4,599 |
|
|
|
4,053 |
|
|
|
7,318 |
|
|
|
7,159 |
|
Specialty Plastics |
|
|
3,237 |
|
|
|
4,236 |
|
|
|
4,724 |
|
|
|
7,375 |
|
Other Businesses |
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
3,698 |
|
|
|
4,760 |
|
|
|
7,389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment income |
|
|
54,766 |
|
|
|
40,399 |
|
|
|
96,482 |
|
|
|
82,168 |
|
Unallocated corporate expenses |
|
|
12,573 |
|
|
|
17,258 |
|
|
|
19,627 |
|
|
|
31,004 |
|
Restructuring charges |
|
|
9,031 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
13,238 |
|
|
|
1,863 |
|
Other expense, net |
|
|
15,804 |
|
|
|
15,403 |
|
|
|
30,013 |
|
|
|
31,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
17,358 |
|
|
$ |
7,406 |
|
|
$ |
33,604 |
|
|
$ |
18,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
We sell our products throughout the world, and we attribute sales to countries based on the
country where we generate the customer invoice. We have detailed net sales by geographic region in
the table below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
United States |
|
$ |
277,902 |
|
|
$ |
239,612 |
|
|
$ |
530,176 |
|
|
$ |
478,018 |
|
International |
|
|
372,494 |
|
|
|
314,046 |
|
|
|
727,476 |
|
|
|
605,345 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net sales |
|
$ |
650,396 |
|
|
$ |
553,658 |
|
|
$ |
1,257,652 |
|
|
$ |
1,083,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
Net income for the three months ended June 30, 2008, increased to $9.4 million from $4.5
million in the second quarter of 2007. Income increased primarily as a result of higher sales that
led to increased gross profit; lower selling, general and administrative expense; and lower
interest expense. Partially offsetting these improvements was an increase in restructuring charges
during the quarter.
Net sales increased by 17.5% as a result of higher sales in our Electronic Materials, Color
and Glass Performance Materials, Performance Coatings, Polymer Additives, and Other Businesses
segments. Sales in the Specialty Plastics segment declined compared with the second quarter of
2007. The primary drivers for the increased sales were product price
changes, including the pass-through of higher precious metal costs,
changes in foreign currency exchange rates and increased sales
volumes.
Raw material costs continued to be highly volatile in the quarter, with petrochemical-based
raw materials, natural oils and fat-based inputs rising the most quickly. Raw material costs
increased, in aggregate, across the business although costs of some individual raw materials have
moderated during the past several quarters. Gross profit increased during the quarter as a result
of higher sales. Gross profit percentage declined compared with the second quarter of 2007
primarily as a result of increased precious metal costs, which we generally pass through to
customers with minimal gross profit contribution.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses declined in the 2008 second quarter.
SG&A expenses as a percent of sales declined to 12.5% from 15.2% in the second quarter of 2007.
The beneficial effects of prior restructuring and other expense reduction efforts reduced SG&A
expenses in the 2008 second quarter, while unfavorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates
increased SG&A expenses as measured in U.S. dollars. In addition, SG&A expenses were higher in the
second quarter of 2007 partly as a result of litigation settlement costs.
Interest expense declined in the second quarter compared with the prior-year period primarily
as a result of lower interest rates on our floating-rate borrowings, partially offset by higher
average borrowings.
Outlook
Economic conditions continue to be mixed, with an outlook for slower general economic growth
in most markets. Markets in the United States that are related to residential housing, automobiles
and automobile parts, and appliances are expected to continue a pattern of weak customer demand
that has existed for the past year. This market weakness is expected to negatively affect the
volume of products sold in our Specialty Plastics, Polymer Additives, Color and Glass Performance
Materials, and Performance Coatings segments. Markets outside the United States are generally
stronger, although rates of growth are expected to be lower than levels experienced in 2007.
Customer demand for our products in continental Europe has been affected by slower economic growth. Demand
from customers in regions we supply from Europe, such as North Africa, the Middle East and Central
Europe, continues to be relatively strong. Demand growth in Asia continues to be strong for a
number of our products, particularly our conductive metal pastes used in solar cell manufacturing.
The demand for these pastes is expected to continue an upward trend, although rapid expansion of
capacity among solar cell manufacturers could lead to some increased demand volatility due to
short-term supply and demand imbalances in the future.
We expect to continue to record charges associated with our current and future restructuring
programs, particularly related to our rationalization of the manufacturing assets in our European
operations.
Factors that could adversely affect our future financial performance are described under the
heading Risk Factors of Item 1A of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2008.
21
Results of Operations
Comparison of the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
650,396 |
|
|
$ |
553,658 |
|
|
$ |
96,738 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
527,012 |
|
|
|
446,131 |
|
|
|
80,881 |
|
|
|
18.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
123,384 |
|
|
|
107,527 |
|
|
|
15,857 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
% |
Gross profit percentage |
|
|
19.0 |
% |
|
|
19.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
81,191 |
|
|
|
84,386 |
|
|
|
(3,195 |
) |
|
|
(3.8 |
%) |
Restructuring charges |
|
|
9,031 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
8,699 |
|
|
|
2,620.2 |
% |
Other expense (income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
13,214 |
|
|
|
14,286 |
|
|
|
(1,072 |
) |
|
|
(7.5 |
%) |
Interest earned |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
(189 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(24.9 |
%) |
Foreign currency losses, net |
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
423 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
53.7 |
% |
Miscellaneous expense, net |
|
|
2,082 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
135.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
17,358 |
|
|
|
7,406 |
|
|
|
9,952 |
|
|
|
134.4 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
8,002 |
|
|
|
2,808 |
|
|
|
5,194 |
|
|
|
185.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
9,356 |
|
|
|
4,598 |
|
|
|
4,758 |
|
|
|
103.5 |
% |
(Gain) loss on disposal of discontinued
operations, net of tax |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(67 |
) |
|
|
(115.5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
9,365 |
|
|
$ |
4,540 |
|
|
$ |
4,825 |
|
|
|
106.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
110.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, increased by 17.5%, driven by increased product
pricing and favorable product mix, favorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates and
improved sales volume. Sales volume increased the most strongly in the Electronic Materials and
Performance Coatings segments. Sales volume declined in Specialty Plastics and Polymer Additives.
Sales increased in Europe, the United States, Asia and Latin America compared with the second
quarter of 2007.
Gross profit was higher in the 2008 second quarter as a result of increased product pricing,
higher sales volume and manufacturing cost reduction programs, partially offset by higher raw
material costs. Gross profit was reduced by $1.4 million in the quarter as a result of asset
write-offs and costs related to manufacturing rationalization activities. Charges for
manufacturing rationalization activities reduced gross profit by $1.9 million in the second quarter
of 2007. Gross profit percentage was negatively impacted by higher raw material costs, including
precious metal costs. Precious metal costs are generally passed through to customers with minimal
gross profit contribution.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses declined to 12.5% of net sales in the
2008 second quarter compared with 15.2% of net sales in the prior-year period. The 2008
second-quarter SG&A expense included charges of $2.4 million primarily related to corporate
development activities, asset write-offs, and employee severance expenses. The 2007
second-quarter SG&A expenses included an increased reserve for litigation settlements and other
charges totaling $7.8 million. The 2008 second quarter expenses benefited from prior-period
restructuring initiatives and other expense reduction activities, and were increased by changes in
foreign currency exchange rates.
Restructuring charges of $9.0 million were recorded in the 2008 second quarter, up from $0.3
million in the second quarter of 2007. The 2008 second quarter charges were primarily related to
our manufacturing rationalization activities in Europe and Latin America related to our Performance
Coatings and Color and Glass Performance Materials segments.
22
Interest expense declined in the 2008 second quarter primarily as a result of lower average
interest rates on our variable-rate borrowings, partially offset by higher borrowing levels.
Miscellaneous expense increased in the second quarter of 2008 primarily as a result of an
increased provision for an environmental contingency in Latin America related to a previously
closed manufacturing property.
Income tax expense for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was $8.0 million or 46.1% of
pre-tax income compared with $2.8 million or 37.9% of pre-tax income in the second quarter of 2007.
The primary reasons for the increase in the effective tax rate were a change in the mix of income
by country, loss of a tax holiday and a decrease in the U.S. tax cost on foreign dividends. The
effective tax rate was also impacted by an unfavorable tax decision in Brazil and favorable
adjustments to prior-year accruals that increased tax expense in the 2008 second quarter by $1.6
million, in aggregate.
There were no new businesses included in discontinued operations in the second quarter of
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Coatings |
|
$ |
178,504 |
|
|
$ |
158,501 |
|
|
$ |
20,003 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
% |
Electronic Materials |
|
|
156,202 |
|
|
|
108,823 |
|
|
|
47,379 |
|
|
|
43.5 |
% |
Color & Glass Performance Materials |
|
|
130,230 |
|
|
|
109,920 |
|
|
|
20,310 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
% |
Polymer Additives |
|
|
98,715 |
|
|
|
85,160 |
|
|
|
13,555 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
% |
Specialty Plastics |
|
|
63,609 |
|
|
|
69,797 |
|
|
|
(6,188 |
) |
|
|
(8.9 |
%) |
Other Businesses |
|
|
23,136 |
|
|
|
21,457 |
|
|
|
1,679 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment sales |
|
$ |
650,396 |
|
|
$ |
553,658 |
|
|
$ |
96,738 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Operating Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Coatings |
|
$ |
12,785 |
|
|
$ |
10,815 |
|
|
$ |
1,970 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
% |
Electronic Materials |
|
|
17,683 |
|
|
|
4,929 |
|
|
|
12,754 |
|
|
|
258.8 |
% |
Color & Glass Performance Materials |
|
|
15,547 |
|
|
|
12,668 |
|
|
|
2,879 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
% |
Polymer Additives |
|
|
4,599 |
|
|
|
4,053 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
13.5 |
% |
Specialty Plastics |
|
|
3,237 |
|
|
|
4,236 |
|
|
|
(999 |
) |
|
|
(23.6 |
%) |
Other Businesses |
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
3,698 |
|
|
|
(2,783 |
) |
|
|
(75.3 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income |
|
$ |
54,766 |
|
|
$ |
40,399 |
|
|
$ |
14,367 |
|
|
|
35.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Coatings Segment Results. Sales increased in Performance Coatings primarily due
to higher sales of tile coating products. The sales increase was driven by favorable changes in
foreign exchange rates. The positive effect of sales volume increases in tile coatings was
partially offset by volume declines in sales of porcelain enamel products. Sales increased in
Europe, and declined in the United States. Operating income increased in the second quarter
primarily as a result of improved product pricing, manufacturing cost improvements and increased
volume, partially offset by raw material cost increases.
Electronic Materials Segment Results. Sales increased in Electronic Materials, driven by
strong worldwide demand for metal pastes and powders, particularly those products used to
manufacture solar cells. The increased sales were driven by sales volume improvements and price
increases, including increased precious metal costs which generally are passed through to our
customers through higher prices for our products. Sales grew primarily as a result of increased
sales sourced from our facilities in the United States, although many of these products are used by
customers in other regions. Operating income increased as a result of increased sales, a favorable
product mix, and benefits from prior-period manufacturing restructuring activities. Also, the 2007
second quarter operating income was reduced by a temporary interruption of manufacturing activities
at our South Plainfield, New Jersey, manufacturing site.
23
Color and Glass Performance Materials Segment Results. Sales increased in Color and Glass
Performance Materials as a result of higher sales of glass coatings and performance pigments
materials. The primary drivers of the higher sales were favorable changes in foreign exchange
rates and increased product prices. Sales increased in all regions, led by sales growth in Europe.
Operating income increased primarily as a result of increased product pricing and sales volume,
partially offset by increased raw material costs.
Polymer Additives Segment Results. Sales increased in Polymer Additives as a result of
improved pricing and product mix, as well as favorable changes in foreign exchange rates. Sales
increased in Europe and the United States, the segments two primary sales regions. Operating
income increased primarily as a result of improved product pricing, which offset higher raw material costs, and improved product mix.
Specialty Plastics Segment Results. Sales declined in Specialty Plastics as a result of weak
demand in the United States, particularly from customers in the automotive parts and appliance
industries. As a result of the weak demand, sales volume declined, more than offsetting the
positive effects of higher product pricing. Operating income declined from the prior-year period
as a consequence of lower manufacturing volume and higher raw material costs, partially offset by
increased product pricing. Lower manufacturing costs and SG&A expenses, achieved through
reductions in employee positions, also contributed positively to operating income.
Other Businesses Segment Results. Sales increased in Other Businesses as a result of
increased sales of fine chemical products in Asia and the United States. Sales of pharmaceutical
products to U.S. customers declined compared to the second quarter of 2007, primarily as a result
of the timing of our customers production campaigns. Since our customers produce certain
low-volume products during intermittent production campaigns, demand for our products used in these
products tends to be volatile. Operating income declined as a result of a less favorable product
mix, resulting from the decline in pharmaceutical product sales and an increased proportion of
lower margin industrial solvent sales in the quarter, as well as higher raw material and
manufacturing costs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
277,902 |
|
|
$ |
239,612 |
|
|
$ |
38,290 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
% |
International |
|
|
372,494 |
|
|
|
314,046 |
|
|
|
58,448 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
650,396 |
|
|
$ |
553,658 |
|
|
$ |
96,738 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales increased in all regions during the second quarter of 2008 compared with the prior-year
quarter. In the United States, the sales increase was driven by Electronic Materials, with
additional contributions from Color and Glass Performance Materials and Polymer Additives. U.S.
sales declined in Specialty Plastics and Performance Coatings. International sales increased in
Europe, Asia and Latin America. The international sales increases were led by sales growth in
Performance Coatings, Color and Glass Performance Materials, Electronic Materials and Polymer
Additives.
24
Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
1,257,652 |
|
|
$ |
1,083,363 |
|
|
$ |
174,289 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
% |
Cost of sales |
|
|
1,020,949 |
|
|
|
869,056 |
|
|
|
151,893 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
236,703 |
|
|
|
214,307 |
|
|
|
22,396 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
% |
Gross profit percentage |
|
|
18.8 |
% |
|
|
19.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
159,848 |
|
|
|
163,143 |
|
|
|
(3,295 |
) |
|
|
(2.0 |
%) |
Restructuring charges |
|
|
13,238 |
|
|
|
1,863 |
|
|
|
11,375 |
|
|
|
610.6 |
% |
Other expense (income): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
27,243 |
|
|
|
31,732 |
|
|
|
(4,489 |
) |
|
|
(14.1 |
%) |
Interest earned |
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
(1,154 |
) |
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
(76.5 |
%) |
Foreign currency (gains) losses, net |
|
|
(891 |
) |
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
(1,825 |
) |
|
|
(195.4 |
%) |
Miscellaneous expense (income), net |
|
|
3,932 |
|
|
|
(386 |
) |
|
|
4,318 |
|
|
|
(1,118.7 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes |
|
|
33,604 |
|
|
|
18,175 |
|
|
|
15,429 |
|
|
|
84.9 |
% |
Income tax expense |
|
|
15,083 |
|
|
|
7,342 |
|
|
|
7,741 |
|
|
|
105.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations |
|
|
18,521 |
|
|
|
10,833 |
|
|
|
7,688 |
|
|
|
71.0 |
% |
Loss on disposal of discontinued operations, net of tax |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
(198 |
) |
|
|
(92.5 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
18,505 |
|
|
$ |
10,619 |
|
|
$ |
7,886 |
|
|
|
74.3 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.24 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
75.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net sales in the six months ended June 30, 2008, increased by 16.1% compared with the same
period in 2007. The sales increase was the result of higher sales in our Electronic Materials,
Color and Glass Performance Materials, Performance Coatings, and Polymer Additives segments. Sales
in the Specialty Plastics segment declined. The sales growth was the result of higher product
prices and improved product mix, favorable changes in foreign currency exchange rates and higher
sales volumes. Sales grew in Europe, the United States, Asia and Latin America compared with the
first six months of 2007.
Gross profit increased during the first half of 2008 compared with the prior-year period,
primarily as a result of increased product prices and higher sales, partially offset by higher raw
material costs. Gross profit during the first six months of 2008 was reduced by $1.6 million of
charges primarily related to asset write-offs and manufacturing rationalization activities. Gross
profit was also negatively impacted by costs of approximately $3.3 million to clean up an
accidental discharge of product into the wastewater treatment facility at our Bridgeport, New
Jersey, manufacturing location. Gross profit percentage was negatively impacted by higher raw
material costs, including precious metal costs. Precious metal cost changes are generally passed
through to customers with minimal gross profit contribution. Gross profit was reduced by
$4.1 million in the first six months of 2007, primarily as a result of accelerated depreciation
charges associated with our manufacturing rationalization activities.
Also, gross profit was reduced by the costs of a temporary
interruption of production at our South Plainfield, New Jersey,
manufacturing site during the first six months of 2007.
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses declined to 12.7% of net sales in the
first half of 2008 from 15.1% in the first half of 2007. SG&A expenses for the first six months of
2008 included charges of $1.9 million primarily related to corporate development activities, asset
write-offs, and employee severance expenses, partially offset by benefits from litigation
settlements and insurance proceeds. Charges of $8.3 million were included in SG&A expenses during
the first six months of 2007, primarily related to increased reserves for litigation settlements
and corporate development activities.
Restructuring charges of $13.2 million were recorded in the first six months of 2008, an
increase from $1.9 million in the first half of 2007. The 2008 restructuring charges were
primarily related to manufacturing rationalization activities in our Performance Coatings and Color
and Glass Performance Materials manufacturing operations in Europe and Brazil, and
additional restructuring activities in our Performance Coatings, Color and Glass Performance
Materials, Polymer Additives, and Specialty Plastics segments that were initiated in 2007 and the
first half of 2008.
25
Interest expense declined in the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared with the prior-year
period. In the first half of 2007, we recorded a non-recurring $2.0 million write-off of
unamortized fees associated with an unused portion of our term loan arrangements. In the first
half of 2008, our interest expense also declined because our average borrowing levels were lower
and the variable interest rate on our revolving credit facility was lower than during the same
period in 2007.
Income tax expense for the first six months of 2008 was $15.1 million, or 44.9% of pre-tax
income. Income tax expense for the 2007 first half was $7.3 million, or 40.4% of pre-tax income.
The primary reasons for the increase in the effective tax rate were a change in the mix of income
by country, loss of a tax holiday and a decrease in the U.S. tax cost on foreign dividends. The
effective tax rate was also impacted by an unfavorable tax decision in Brazil, an increase in the
foreign valuation allowance and favorable adjustments to prior year accruals that increased tax
expense in the first six months of 2008 by $2.2 million, in aggregate.
There were no new businesses included in discontinued operations in the first six months of
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Coatings |
|
$ |
339,296 |
|
|
$ |
297,316 |
|
|
$ |
41,980 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
% |
Electronic Materials |
|
|
297,195 |
|
|
|
221,767 |
|
|
|
75,428 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
% |
Color & Glass Performance Materials |
|
|
259,070 |
|
|
|
215,620 |
|
|
|
43,450 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
% |
Polymer Additives |
|
|
191,026 |
|
|
|
167,673 |
|
|
|
23,353 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
% |
Specialty Plastics |
|
|
125,402 |
|
|
|
136,758 |
|
|
|
(11,356 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
%) |
Other Businesses |
|
|
45,663 |
|
|
|
44,229 |
|
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment sales |
|
$ |
1,257,652 |
|
|
$ |
1,083,363 |
|
|
$ |
174,289 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Operating Income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Coatings |
|
$ |
22,265 |
|
|
$ |
21,498 |
|
|
$ |
767 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
% |
Electronic Materials |
|
|
26,432 |
|
|
|
11,012 |
|
|
|
15,420 |
|
|
|
140.0 |
% |
Color & Glass Performance Materials |
|
|
30,983 |
|
|
|
27,735 |
|
|
|
3,248 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
% |
Polymer Additives |
|
|
7,318 |
|
|
|
7,159 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
Specialty Plastics |
|
|
4,724 |
|
|
|
7,375 |
|
|
|
(2,651 |
) |
|
|
(35.9 |
%) |
Other Businesses |
|
|
4,760 |
|
|
|
7,389 |
|
|
|
(2,629 |
) |
|
|
(35.6 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income |
|
$ |
96,482 |
|
|
$ |
82,168 |
|
|
$ |
14,314 |
|
|
|
17.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Coatings Segment Results. Sales increased in Performance Coatings primarily
as a result of higher sales of tile coating products. Sales in Europe, Asia and Latin America
increased while sales in the United States declined. The sales growth was driven by favorable
changes in foreign exchange rates across all products and improved sales volume in tile coatings.
Operating income increased in the first six months of 2008 due to higher income from the sale of
tile products, partially offset by a decline in income from porcelain enamel products. The
operating income increase primarily was a result of higher product pricing and volume increases,
partially offset by higher raw material costs.
Electronic Materials Segment Results. Sales increased in Electronic Materials, driven by
increased sales of metal pastes and powders, particularly those used by our customers to
manufacture solar cells. Sales increased as a result of improved pricing, higher sales volume and
favorable changes in foreign exchange rates. Sales grew from products sourced in the United States
and Asia. Products from our U.S.-based facilities often are used by our customers in other
regions. Operating income increased as a result of the positive effects of increased sales of
higher-margin products, lower manufacturing costs and benefits from prior-period restructuring.
Also, during the first six months of 2007, operating income was reduced as a consequence of a
temporary interruption of manufacturing activities at our South Plainfield, New Jersey,
manufacturing site.
26
Color and Glass Performance Materials Segment Results. Sales increased in Color and
Glass Performance Materials as a result of increased sales of glass coatings and performance
pigment materials. The higher sales were driven primarily by a combination of favorable changes in
foreign exchange rates and improved product mix. Sales increased in all regions, led by sales
growth in Europe. Operating income improved primarily as a result of higher product pricing,
partially offset by higher raw material costs.
Polymer Additives Segment Results. Sales increased in Polymer Additives primarily as a
result of higher product pricing and favorable changes in foreign exchange rates, partially offset
by the negative effects of lower sales volume. Sales increased in the United States and Europe.
During the first six months of 2008, operating income grew slightly, as the positive effects of
product price increases were largely offset by raw material cost increases and lower sales volumes.
Also during the first half of 2008, we incurred additional manufacturing costs of approximately
$3.3 million resulting from the clean-up of an accidental discharge of product into the wastewater
treatment facility at our Bridgeport, New Jersey, manufacturing location.
Specialty Plastics Segment Results. Sales declined in Specialty Plastics primarily as a
result of weak demand from U.S.-based customers in the automotive parts and appliance industries.
As a result of the weak demand, sales volume declined, more than offsetting the effects of higher
product pricing and favorable foreign currency exchange rates. Operating income declined due to
the combination of higher raw material costs and lower manufacturing volumes, partially offset by
increased product pricing. Cost reduction activities in manufacturing and SG&A expense, compared
with the prior-year period, contributed positively to operating income.
Other Businesses Segment Results. Sales increased in Other Businesses primarily as a
result of increased sales of fine chemical products in Asia. Sales of pharmaceutical products in
the United States declined in the period, primarily as a result of the timing of our customers
production campaigns. Since our customers produce certain low-volume products during
intermittent production campaigns, demand for our products used in these products tends to be
volatile. Operating income declined as a result of a less favorable product mix, which included
fewer pharmaceutical sales and a larger proportion of lower-margin industrial solvent sales, and
raw material cost increases.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
$ |
530,176 |
|
|
$ |
478,018 |
|
|
$ |
52,158 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
% |
International |
|
|
727,476 |
|
|
|
605,345 |
|
|
|
122,131 |
|
|
|
20.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,257,652 |
|
|
$ |
1,083,363 |
|
|
$ |
174,289 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales increased in all regions during the first six months of 2008 compared with the first six
months of 2007. In the United States, the sales increase was driven by Electronic Materials, with
additional contributions from Color and Glass Performance Materials and Polymer Additives. U.S.
sales declined in Specialty Plastics and Performance Coatings. International sales increased in
Europe, Asia and Latin America. The international sales growth was led by increased sales in
Performance Coatings, Color and Glass Performance Materials, Electronic Materials, and Polymer
Additives.
27
Summary of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
$ Change |
|
|
% Change |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
6,693 |
|
|
$ |
69,817 |
|
|
$ |
(63,124 |
) |
|
|
(90.4 |
%) |
Net cash used for investing activities |
|
|
(33,926 |
) |
|
|
(28,098 |
) |
|
|
(5,828 |
) |
|
|
20.7 |
% |
Net cash provided by (used for) financing activities |
|
|
28,550 |
|
|
|
(41,248 |
) |
|
|
69,798 |
|
|
|
(169.2 |
%) |
Effect of
exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
(291 |
) |
|
|
(85.8 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
1,365 |
|
|
$ |
810 |
|
|
$ |
555 |
|
|
|
68.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities decreased by $63.1 million in the first half of 2008
compared with the same period of 2007. In the first half of 2007, we received $70.1 million of
deposits held by financial institutions under our precious metals consignment program. Deposit
requirements were eliminated during 2007. Operating cash flows benefited from an increase of
$7.9 million in net income in the first half of 2008 over the comparable period in 2007.
Cash used for investing activities increased by $5.8 million, primarily due to higher capital
expenditures of $3.7 million and lower proceeds from sales of assets and businesses of
$1.7 million.
Cash flows from financing activities increased by $69.8 million. Changes in borrowing
activity resulted in an increase of $78.9 million. In the first half of 2008, we borrowed
$45.8 million, while in the same period of 2007, we used cash to reduce our debt by $33.1 million.
The first half of 2007 also included $8.2 million in proceeds to the Company from the exercise of
stock options.
Capital Resources and Liquidity
Credit Rating
At June 30, 2008, the Companys corporate credit rating was B1, with a positive outlook, by
Moodys and B+, with a stable outlook, by Standard & Poors Rating Group.
Revolving Credit and Term Loan Facility
In 2006, we entered into an agreement with a group of lenders for a $700 million credit
facility, consisting of a multi-currency senior revolving credit facility and a senior term loan
facility. In 2007, we cancelled the unused portion of the term loan facility and amended the
credit facility (the Amended Credit Facility). At June 30, 2008, the Amended Credit Facility
consisted of a $300 million revolving credit facility, which matures in 2011, and a $305 million
term loan facility, which matures in 2012. As part of the agreement, we can request an increase of
$50 million in the revolving credit facility. At June 30, 2008, we were in compliance with the
covenants of the Amended Credit Facility.
At June 30, 2008, we had borrowed $64.1 million of the revolver and had $227.3 million
available, after reductions for standby letters of credit secured by this facility. At June 30,
2008, we had borrowed $294.0 million in term loans. In 2007, we began making periodic principal
payments on the term loans. We are required to make minimum quarterly principal payments of
$0.8 million from July 2008 to July 2011. During the last year of the loans life, we are required
to repay the remaining balance of the term loans in four quarterly installments. Currently, those
last four payments will be $71.0 million each. In addition to the minimum quarterly payments, each
April we may be required to make an additional principal payment. The amount of this additional
payment is dependent on the Companys leverage and certain cash flow metrics. Any additional
payment that is required reduces, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, the amount due in the last four
quarterly payments. In April 2008, we made a term loan principal payment of $7.2 million,
consisting of the $0.8 million minimum quarterly payment and a $6.4 million additional principal
payment.
28
Senior Notes and Debentures
At June 30, 2008, we had $200.0 million principal amount outstanding under senior notes, and
we were in compliance with the covenants under their indentures. The senior notes are due
January 1, 2009. We continue to classify the senior notes as noncurrent liabilities, because we
have both the intention to refinance them in a way that would extend their maturity beyond one year
and the ability to do so through availability under our revolving credit facility.
In June 2008, we commenced a cash tender offer to purchase any and all of the senior notes.
We intend to finance the purchase of the senior notes due 2009 and related fees and expenses
primarily through a proposed public offering of $200 million of senior notes due 2016. The exact
terms and timing of the offering depends upon market conditions and other factors.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
Receivable Sales Programs. We have several programs to sell, on an ongoing basis, pools of
our trade accounts receivable. These programs accelerate cash collections at favorable financing
costs and help us manage the Companys liquidity requirements.
In our largest program, which expires in 2009, we sell, on an ongoing basis, substantially all
of Ferros U.S. trade accounts receivable to Ferro Finance Corporation (FFC), a wholly-owned
unconsolidated qualified special purpose entity (QSPE). FFC finances its acquisition of trade
receivable assets by issuing beneficial interests in (securitizing) the receivables to multi-seller
receivables securitization companies (Conduits). In June 2008, we amended the program to reduce
the maximum proceeds and the conduits commitment levels from $100.0 million to $75 million. FFC
and the Conduits have no recourse to Ferros other assets for failure of debtors to pay when due as
the assets transferred are legally isolated in accordance with the U.S. bankruptcy laws. Ferros
consolidated balance sheet does not include the trade receivables sold, but does include a note
receivable from FFC to the extent that cash proceeds from the sales of accounts receivable to FFC
have not yet been received by Ferro. At June 30, 2008, Ferro had received net proceeds of
$75.0 million for outstanding receivables, and the balance of Ferros note receivable from FFC was
$28.4 million.
In addition, we maintain several international programs to sell trade accounts receivable,
primarily without recourse. The commitments supporting these programs can be withdrawn at any time
and totaled $87.2 million at June 30, 2008. Ferro had received net proceeds under the
international programs of $41.2 million at June 30, 2008, for outstanding receivables.
Consignment and Customer Arrangements for Precious Metals. In the production of some of our
products, we use precious metals, primarily silver for Electronic Materials products and gold for
Color and Glass Performance Materials products. We obtain most precious metals from financial
institutions under consignment agreements with terms of one year or less. The financial
institutions retain ownership of the precious metals and charge us fees based on the amounts we
consign. We also process precious metals owned by our customers. At June 30, 2008, we had on hand
$167.0 million of precious metals owned by financial institutions, measured at fair value.
Bank Guarantees and Standby Letters of Credit. At June 30, 2008, the Company and its
subsidiaries had bank guarantees and standby letters of credit issued by financial institutions,
which totaled $18.1 million. These agreements primarily relate to Ferros insurance programs,
potential environmental remediation liabilities, and foreign tax payments.
Other Financing Arrangements
In addition, the Company maintains other lines of credit and receivable sales programs to
provide global flexibility for the Companys liquidity requirements. Most of these facilities are
uncommitted lines for the Companys international operations.
Liquidity Requirement
Our liquidity requirements primarily include debt service, purchase commitments, working
capital requirements, capital investments, postretirement obligations and dividend payments.
Ferros level of debt and debt service requirements could have important consequences to its
business operations and uses of cash flows. However, the liquidity available under our
revolving credit agreement, along with liquidity from other financing arrangements, available
cash flows from operations, and asset sales, should allow the Company to meet its funding
requirements and other commitments.
29
We assess on an ongoing basis our portfolio of businesses, as well as our financial and
capital structure, to ensure that we have sufficient capital and liquidity to meet our strategic
objectives. As part of this process, from time to time we evaluate the possible divestiture of
businesses that are not critical to our core strategic objectives and, where appropriate, pursue
the sale of such businesses. We also evaluate and pursue acquisition opportunities that we believe
will enhance our strategic position. We generally announce publicly divestiture and acquisition
transactions only when we have entered into definitive agreements relating to those transactions.
Critical Accounting Policies and Their Application
There are no material changes to our critical accounting policies described in Critical
Accounting Policies within Item 7 of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2007.
Newly Adopted Accounting Standards
On January 1, 2008, we adopted FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements, (FAS
No. 157), FASB Staff Position No. FAS 157-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB
Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for
Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement Under Statement 13, (FSP No. FAS 157-1), and FASB
Staff Position No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, (FSP No. FAS 157-2). FAS
No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework and gives guidance regarding the methods used
for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements, but does not
require any new fair value measurements. FSP No. FAS 157-1 excludes FASB Statement No. 13,
Accounting for Leases, (FAS No. 13) as well as other accounting pronouncements that address fair
value measurement on lease classification or measurement under FAS No. 13 from the scope of FAS
No. 157. FSP No. FAS 157-2 delays the effective date of FAS No. 157 for all nonrecurring fair
value measurements of nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities until fiscal years beginning
after November 15, 2008. The portions of these pronouncements that were not delayed were adopted
prospectively, and their adoption reduced the disclosed fair value of our borrowings under the
revolving credit and term loan facilities and reduced the carrying value of our interest rate
swaps. We are currently evaluating the impact on our consolidated financial statements of adopting
the deferred portions of these pronouncements on January 1, 2009.
On January 1, 2008, we adopted the measurement provisions of FASB Statement No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of
FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R), (FAS No. 158). The measurement provisions require
companies to measure defined benefit plan assets and obligations as of the annual balance sheet
date. Previously, we used September 30 as the measurement date for U.S. pension and other
postretirement benefits. We have elected to use the September 30, 2007, measurement of assets and
benefit obligations to calculate the fiscal year 2008 expense. Expense for the gap period from
September 30 to December 31 is recognized as of January 1, 2008, as a charge of $0.5 million, net
of tax, to retained earnings and a credit of $0.4 million, net of tax, to accumulated other
comprehensive income.
On January 1, 2008, we adopted FASB Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, (FAS No.
159). This statement permits us to choose, at specified election dates, to measure eligible items
at fair value (the fair value option). For items for which the fair value option has been
elected, we would report unrealized gains and losses in earnings at each subsequent reporting date
and recognize up-front costs and fees in earnings as incurred. We have not elected to measure any
eligible items at fair value, and we do not have any current plans to do so. Therefore, adoption
of FAS No. 159 did not have an effect on our consolidated financial statements.
On January 1, 2008, we adopted Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 06-11, Accounting for
Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards, (EITF No. 06-11). EITF No. 06-11
requires that the income tax benefit from dividends that are charged to retained earnings and paid
to employees for nonvested equity shares be recognized as an increase to paid-in capital.
Previously, we recognized this income tax benefit as an increase to retained earnings. Beginning
in 2008, we report this income tax benefit as an increase to paid-in capital.
30
Newly Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(R), Business Combinations, (FAS
No. 141(R)) and Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements -
an amendment of ARB No. 51, (FAS No. 160). These statements change the way that companies
account for business combinations and noncontrolling interests (e.g., minority interests). Both
standards are to be applied prospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008.
However, FAS No. 160 requires entities to apply the presentation and disclosure requirements
retrospectively to comparative financial statements. In 2009, we will retrospectively reclassify
the amount of minority interests in consolidated subsidiaries to equity and separately report the
amount of net income or loss attributable to minority interests.
In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and
Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, (FAS No. 161). This Statement
requires enhanced disclosures about an entitys derivative and hedging activities. This Statement
is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after
November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. This Statement encourages, but does not
require, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption. We do not expect the
adoption of FAS No. 161 to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In April 2008, the FASB issued Staff Position No. FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life
of Intangible Assets, (FSP No. FAS 142-3). This pronouncement amends the factors that should be
considered in developing renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset under FASB Statement No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
FSP No. FAS 142-3 is to be applied prospectively and is effective for financial statements issued
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, with early adoption prohibited. We are
currently evaluating its effect on our financial statements.
Risk Factors
Certain statements contained here and in future filings with the SEC reflect the Companys
expectations with respect to future performance and constitute forward-looking statements within
the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. These statements are subject to a variety of
uncertainties, unknown risks and other factors concerning the Companys operations and business
environment, which are difficult to predict and are beyond the control of the Company. A detailed
description of such uncertainties, risks and other factors is contained under the heading Risk
Factors of Item 1A of Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
31
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Our exposure to market risks is generally limited to fluctuations in interest rates, foreign
currency exchange rates, and costs of raw materials and energy.
Our exposure to interest rate risk arises from our debt portfolio. We manage this risk by
controlling the mix of fixed versus variable-rate debt after considering the interest rate
environment and expected future cash flows. To reduce our exposure to interest rate changes on
variable-rate debt, we entered into interest rate swap agreements. These swaps effectively convert
a portion of our variable-rate debt to a fixed rate. Our objective is to limit variability in
earnings, cash flows and overall borrowing costs caused by changes in interest rates, while
preserving operating flexibility.
We operate internationally and enter into transactions denominated in foreign currencies.
These transactions expose us to gains and losses arising from exchange rate movements between the
dates foreign currencies are recorded and the dates they are settled. We manage this risk by
entering into forward currency contracts that offset these gains and losses.
We are also subject to cost changes with respect to our raw materials and energy purchases. We
attempt to mitigate raw materials cost increases through product development, price increases, and
other productivity improvements. We hedge a portion of our exposure to changes in the pricing of
certain raw material commodities through swap arrangements that allow us to fix the pricing of the
commodities for future purchases. We also enter into forward purchase arrangements with precious
metals suppliers to completely cover the value of fixed price sales contracts for products with
precious metal content. Some of these precious metals agreements, with purchase commitments
totaling $18.0 million at June 30, 2008, are designated as normal purchase contracts and are not
marked to market. In addition, we purchase portions of our natural gas and electricity
requirements under fixed price contracts to reduce the volatility of these costs. These energy
contracts are designated as normal purchase contracts, are not marked to market, and had purchase
commitments totaling $19.9 million at June 30, 2008.
32
The notional amounts, net carrying amounts of assets (liabilities), and fair values associated
with our exposure to these market risks and sensitivity analyses about potential gains (losses)
resulting from hypothetical changes in market rates are presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands, |
|
|
|
except as noted) |
|
Variable-rate debt and utilization of accounts receivable sales programs: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in annual interest expense from 1% change in interest rates |
|
$ |
3,294 |
|
|
$ |
2,636 |
|
Fixed-rate debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying amount |
|
$ |
200,502 |
|
|
$ |
200,404 |
|
Fair value |
|
$ |
204,129 |
|
|
$ |
205,705 |
|
Change in fair value from 1% increase in interest rate |
|
$ |
(991 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,929 |
) |
Change in fair value from 1% decrease in interest rate |
|
$ |
1,000 |
|
|
$ |
1,957 |
|
Interest rate swaps: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount |
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
|
$ |
150,000 |
|
Carrying amount and fair value |
|
$ |
(7,168 |
) |
|
$ |
(8,109 |
) |
Change in fair value from 1% increase in interest rate |
|
$ |
4,080 |
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
Change in fair value from 1% decrease in interest rate |
|
$ |
(4,202 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,181 |
) |
Foreign currency forward contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount |
|
$ |
132,815 |
|
|
$ |
142,638 |
|
Carrying amount and fair value |
|
$ |
(568 |
) |
|
$ |
(268 |
) |
Change in fair value from 10% appreciation of U.S. dollar |
|
$ |
1,456 |
|
|
$ |
(1,402 |
) |
Change in fair value from 10% depreciation of U.S. dollar |
|
$ |
(1,779 |
) |
|
$ |
1,714 |
|
Raw material commodity swaps: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount (in metric tons of base metals) |
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
1,171 |
|
Carrying amount and fair value |
|
$ |
(1,025 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,499 |
) |
Change in fair value from 10% change in forward prices |
|
$ |
329 |
|
|
$ |
507 |
|
Precious metals forward contracts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount (in troy ounces) |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
159,648 |
|
Carrying amount and fair value |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
755 |
|
Change in fair value from 10% change in forward prices |
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
612 |
|
33
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Ferro is committed to maintaining disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed in its Exchange Act reports is recorded,
processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to
its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate
to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
As required by Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act, Ferro has carried out an evaluation, under
the supervision and with the participation of its management, including its Chief Executive Officer
and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure
controls and procedures. The evaluation examined those disclosure controls and procedures as of
June 30, 2008, the end of the period covered by this report. We have taken measures to improve our
internal controls and procedures; however, there has not been adequate time for us to conclude that
the material weakness in the Companys internal control over financial reporting described in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, has been fully remediated.
Therefore, Ferros management, including its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial
Officer, has concluded that, as of June 30, 2008, Ferros disclosure controls and procedures were
not effective.
Additional procedures were performed in order for management to conclude with reasonable
assurance that the Companys condensed consolidated financial statements contained in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q present fairly, in all material respects, the Companys financial
position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the second quarter of 2008, there were no material changes in our internal controls or
in other factors that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal controls over financial reporting.
34
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
The information on legal proceedings contained in Note 9 to the condensed consolidated
financial statements is incorporated here by reference.
In December 1994, our Brazilian subsidiary, Ferro Enamel do Brasil Industria e Comercio Ltda.
(Ferro Brazil), filed a lawsuit in Brazilian federal court seeking judicial sanctioning of the
use of a particular monetary correction index for computing net profits for taxable years beginning
in 1994 rather than an alternative index put forward by the Brazilian administration. In June
1997, the Brazilian federal court found partially in favor of Ferro Brazil. On appeal, in June
2008 the Brazilian appeals court reversed the lower court opinion and ruled that the index put
forward by the Brazilian administration should have been used. Ferro Brazil is appealing the
appellate decision but, in order to avoid penalty assessments, in July 2008, Ferro Brazil paid into
the court $2.2 million to satisfy the income taxes and interest that would be owed if Ferro
Brazils appeal is unsuccessful.
For the year ended December 31, 2007, we submitted deviation reports required by the Title V
air emission permit issued under the New Jersey Air Pollution Control Code (the Title V Air
Permit), which contained numerous deviations from the standards required by the Title V Air Permit
at our South Plainfield, New Jersey, facility. While no penalty has been assessed at this time, we
are in the process of negotiating an administrative consent order and a compliance schedule to
settle these issues with the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP). We
cannot determine the outcome of these settlement negotiations at this time.
In each of February 2007 and February 2008, the NJDEP issued an administrative order and
notice of civil administrative penalty assessment to the Company for alleged violations at our
Bridgeport, New Jersey, facility of the NJDEP laws and regulations regarding water discharge
requirements pursuant to the New Jersey Water Pollution Control Act (WPCA). The aggregate penalty
assessment issued by the NJDEP through November 2007 is $0.4 million. We are in the process of
negotiating an administrative consent order and a compliance schedule to settle these issues with
the NJDEP. We cannot determine the outcome of these settlement negotiations at this time.
In March 1997, the Company, as a potentially responsible party, filed a notice of intention to
comply with the remediation of a federal Superfund site owned by Waste Disposal, Inc., located in
Santa Fe Springs, California. The United States Environmental Protection Agency and the California
Environmental Protection Agency oversaw the remediation of the site, which was completed in 2004,
and are overseeing the continuing operation and maintenance of the site. There is a remaining
liability to fund operations and maintenance costs through 2034. In May 2008, we paid $0.9 million
to fully settle our liability associated with this site.
35
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Many factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those suggested by
statements contained in this filing and could adversely affect our future financial performance.
Such factors include the following:
We depend on reliable sources of raw materials, energy, petroleum-based products and other supplies
at a reasonable cost, but the availability of these materials and supplies could be interrupted
and/or their prices could escalate and adversely affect our sales and profitability.
We purchase many raw materials and supplies, including energy and petroleum-based products,
that we use to manufacture our products. Changes in their availability or price could affect our
ability to manufacture enough products to meet customers demands or to manufacture products
profitably. We try to maintain multiple sources of raw materials and supplies where practical, but
this may not prevent unanticipated changes in their availability or cost. We may not be able to
pass cost increases through to our customers. Significant disruptions in availability or cost
increases could adversely affect our manufacturing volume or costs, which could negatively affect
product sales or profitability of our operations.
The markets for our products are highly competitive and subject to intense price competition, and
that could adversely affect our sales and earnings performance.
Our customers typically have multiple suppliers from which to choose. If we are unwilling or
unable to provide products at competitive prices, and if other factors, such as product performance
and value-added services do not provide an offsetting competitive advantage, customers may reduce,
discontinue, or decide not to purchase our products. If we could not secure alternate customers for
lost business, our sales and earnings performance could be adversely affected.
We strive to improve operating margins through sales growth, price increases, productivity gains,
improved purchasing techniques and restructuring activities, but we may not achieve the desired
improvements.
We work to improve operating profit margins through activities such as growing sales to
achieve increased economies of scale, increasing prices, improving manufacturing processes,
adopting purchasing techniques that lower costs or provide increased cost predictability, and
restructuring businesses to realize cost savings. However, these activities depend on a combination
of improved product design and engineering, effective manufacturing process control initiatives,
cost-effective redistribution of production, and other efforts that may not be as successful as
anticipated. The success of sales growth and price increases depends not only on our actions but
also the strength of customer demand and competitors pricing responses, which are not fully
predictable. Failure to successfully implement actions to improve operating margins could adversely
affect our financial performance.
We sell our products into industries where demand has been unpredictable, cyclical or heavily
influenced by consumer spending.
We sell our products to a wide variety of customers who supply many different market segments.
Many of these market segments, such as building and renovation, major appliances, transportation
and electronics, are cyclical or closely tied to consumer demand, which is difficult to predict.
Incorrect forecasts of demand or unforeseen reductions in demand can adversely affect costs and
profitability due to factors such as underused manufacturing capacity, excess inventory, or working
capital needs. These factors can result in lower profitability.
36
The global scope of our operations exposes us to risks related to currency conversion rates and
changing economic, social and political conditions around the world.
More than 50% of our net sales during 2007 were outside of the U.S. In order to support global
customers, access regional markets and compete effectively, our operations are located around the
world. As a result, our operations have additional complexity from changing economic, social and
political conditions in multiple locations and we are subject to risks relating to currency
conversion rates. Other risks inherent in international operations include the following:
|
|
|
new and different legal and regulatory requirements and enforcement mechanisms in local jurisdictions; |
|
|
|
|
U.S. export licenses may be difficult to obtain and we may be subject to export duties or import
quotas or other trade barriers; |
|
|
|
|
increased costs of, and decreased availability of, transportation or shipping; |
|
|
|
|
credit risk and financial conditions of local customers and distributors; |
|
|
|
|
risk of nationalization of private enterprises by foreign governments or restrictions on investments; |
|
|
|
|
potentially adverse tax consequences, including imposition or increase of withholding and other taxes
on remittances and other payments by subsidiaries; and |
|
|
|
|
local political, economic and social conditions, including the possibility of hyperinflationary
conditions and political instability in certain countries. |
While we attempt to anticipate these changes and manage our business appropriately in each
location where we do business, these changes are often beyond our control and difficult to
forecast. The consequences of these risks may have significant adverse effects on our results of
operations or financial position.
We have a growing presence in the Asia-Pacific region where it can be difficult for a U.S.-based
company, such as Ferro, to compete lawfully with local competitors.
Many of our most promising growth opportunities are in the Asia-Pacific region, especially the
Peoples Republic of China. Although we have been able to compete successfully in those markets to
date, local laws and customs can make it difficult for a U.S.-based company to compete on a level
playing field with local competitors without engaging in conduct that would be illegal under U.S.
law. Our strict policy of observing the highest standards of legal and ethical conduct may cause us
to lose some otherwise attractive business opportunities to local competition in the region.
Regulatory authorities in the U.S., European Union and elsewhere are taking a much more aggressive
approach to regulating hazardous materials, and those regulations could affect sales of our
products.
Hazardous material legislation and regulations can restrict the sale of products and/or
increase the cost of producing them. Some of our products are subject to restrictions under laws or
regulations such as California Proposition 65 or the European Unions (EU) hazardous substances
directive. The EU REACH registration system became effective June 1, 2007, and requires us to
perform toxicity studies of the components of some of our products and to register the information
in a central database, increasing the cost of these products. As a result of these hazardous
material regulations, customers may avoid purchasing some products in favor of perceived greener,
less hazardous or less costly alternatives. This factor could adversely affect our sales and
operating profits.
Our operations are subject to operating hazards and, as a result, to stringent environmental,
health and safety regulations, and compliance with those regulations could require us to make
significant investments.
Our production facilities are subject to hazards associated with the manufacture, handling,
storage and transportation of chemical materials and products. These hazards can cause personal
injury and loss of life, severe damage to, or destruction
of, property and equipment and environmental contamination and other environmental damage and
could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
37
We strive to conduct our manufacturing operations in a manner that is safe and in compliance
with all applicable environmental, health and safety regulations. Compliance with changing
regulations may require us to make significant capital investments, incur training costs, make
changes in manufacturing processes or product formulations, or incur costs that could adversely
affect our profitability, and violations of these laws could lead to substantial fines and
penalties. These costs may not affect competitors in the same way due to differences in product
formulations, manufacturing locations or other factors, and we could be at a competitive
disadvantage, which might adversely affect financial performance.
We depend on external financial resources, and any interruption in access to capital markets or
borrowings could adversely affect our financial condition.
As of December 31, 2007, we had approximately $526.1 million of short-term and long-term debt
with varying maturities. These borrowings have allowed us to make investments in growth
opportunities and fund working capital requirements. Our continued access to capital markets is
essential if we are to meet our current obligations as well as fund our strategic initiatives. An
interruption in our access to external financing could adversely affect our business prospects and
financial condition. See further information regarding our liquidity in the section Management
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Capital Resources and
Liquidity in our most recently filed Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or Annual Report on Form 10-K
and in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in these reports.
Interest rates on some of our borrowings are variable, and our borrowing costs could be affected
adversely by interest rate increases.
Portions of our debt obligations have variable interest rates. Generally, when interest rates
rise, our cost of borrowings increases. We estimate, based on the debt obligations outstanding at
December 31, 2007, that a one percent increase in interest rates would cause interest expense to
increase by approximately $2.6 million annually. Continued interest rate increases could raise the
cost of borrowings and adversely affect our financial performance. See further information
regarding our interest rates on our debt obligations in Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
about Market Risk in our most recently filed Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or Annual Report on
Form 10-K and in the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in these reports.
Many of our assets are encumbered by liens that have been granted to lenders, and those liens
affect our flexibility to dispose of property and businesses.
Our debt obligations are secured by substantially all of our assets. These liens could reduce
our ability and/or extend the time to dispose of property and businesses, as these liens must be
cleared or waived by the lenders prior to any disposition. These security interests are described
in more detail in Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
We are subject to a number of restrictive covenants under our credit facilities, and those
covenants could affect our flexibility to fund strategic initiatives.
Our credit facilities contain a number of restrictive covenants as described in more detail in
Note 5 to the consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2007. These covenants include customary operating restrictions that
limit our ability to engage in certain activities, including additional loans and investments;
prepayments, redemptions and repurchases of debt; and mergers, acquisitions and asset sales. We are
also subject to customary financial covenants including a leverage ratio and a fixed charge
coverage ratio. These covenants restrict the amount of our borrowings, reducing our flexibility to
fund strategic initiatives. Breaches of these covenants could become defaults under our credit
facilities and cause the acceleration of debt payments beyond our ability to pay.
38
We have significant deferred tax assets, and our ability to utilize these assets will depend on our
future performance.
To fully realize the carrying value of our net deferred tax assets, we will have to generate
adequate taxable profits in various tax jurisdictions. As of December 31, 2007, we had $102.8
million of net deferred tax assets, after valuation allowances. If we do not generate adequate
profits within the time periods required by applicable tax statutes, the carrying value of the tax
assets will not be realized. If it becomes unlikely that the carrying value of our net deferred tax
assets will be realized, the valuation allowances may need to be increased in our consolidated
financial statements, adversely affecting results of operations. Further information on our
deferred tax assets is presented in Note 7 to the consolidated financial statements under Item 8 of
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.
We are a defendant in several lawsuits that could have an adverse effect on our financial condition
and/or financial performance, unless they are successfully resolved.
We are routinely involved in litigation brought by suppliers, customers, employees,
governmental agencies and others. Litigation is an inherently unpredictable process and
unanticipated negative outcomes are possible. The most significant pending litigation is described
under Legal Proceedings in our most recently filed Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
Our businesses depend on a continuous stream of new products, and failure to introduce new products
could affect our sales and profitability.
One way that we remain competitive in our markets is by developing and introducing new and
improved products on an ongoing basis. Customers continually evaluate our products in comparison to
those offered by our competitors. A failure to introduce new products at the right time that are
price competitive and that provide the features and performance required by customers could
adversely affect our sales, or could require us to compensate by lowering prices. The result could
be lower sales and/or lower profitability.
We are subject to stringent labor and employment laws in certain jurisdictions in which we operate,
we are party to various collective bargaining arrangements, and our relationship with our employees
could deteriorate, which could adversely impact our operations.
A majority of our full-time employees are employed outside the United States. In certain
jurisdictions where we operate, labor and employment laws are relatively stringent and, in many
cases, grant significant job protection to certain employees, including rights on termination of
employment. In addition, in certain countries where we operate, our employees are members of unions
or are represented by a works council as required by law. We are often required to consult and seek
the consent or advice of these unions and/or respective works councils. These regulations and laws
coupled with the requirement to consult with the relevant unions or works councils could have a
significant impact on our flexibility in managing costs and responding to market changes.
Furthermore, with respect to our employees that are subject to collective bargaining
arrangements or similar arrangements (approximately 18.2% of our U.S. workforce as of December 31,
2007), there can be no assurance that we will be able to negotiate labor agreements on satisfactory
terms or that actions by our employees will not disrupt our business. If these workers were to
engage in a strike, work stoppage or other slowdown or if other employees were to become unionized,
we could experience a significant disruption of our operations and/or higher ongoing labor costs,
which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Employee benefit costs, especially postretirement costs, constitute a significant element of our
annual expenses, and funding these costs could adversely affect our financial condition.
Employee benefit costs are a significant element of our cost structure. Certain expenses,
particularly postretirement costs under defined benefit pension plans and healthcare costs for
employees and retirees, may increase significantly at a rate that is difficult to forecast and may
adversely affect our financial results, financial condition or cash flows.
39
Our restructuring initiatives may not provide sufficient cost savings to justify their expense.
We have undertaken and may continue to undertake productivity initiatives, including
organizational restructurings, to improve performance and generate cost savings. We developed,
initiated, and continue to implement several restructuring programs across a number of our business
segments with the objectives of leveraging our global scale, realigning and lowering our cost
structure, and optimizing capacity utilization. The programs are primarily focused on North America
and Europe. We can make no assurances that these restructuring initiatives will be completed or
beneficial to us. Also, we cannot assure you that any estimated cost savings from such activities
will be realized.
We are exposed to intangible asset risk.
We have recorded intangible assets, including goodwill, in connection with business
acquisitions. We are required to perform goodwill impairment tests at least on an annual basis and
whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable from
estimated future cash flows. As a result of our annual and other periodic evaluations, we may
determine that the intangible asset values need to be written down to their fair values, which
could result in material charges that could be adverse to our operating results and financial
position.
We have in the past identified material weaknesses in our internal controls, and the identification
of any material weaknesses in the future could affect our ability to ensure timely and reliable
financial reports.
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting, which is a process designed by our management to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for
external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its
inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect
misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject
to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of
compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
We conducted an assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting as of December
31, 2007 and concluded that we had a material weakness in those controls. Previously, we had
concluded that we had material weaknesses in our internal controls as of December 31, 2004, 2005
and 2006. A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control
over financial reporting, such that, there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement
of the companys annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a
timely basis. As a result of its assessment, management found that we did not maintain effective
controls over, and monitoring of, user access rights to our financial application systems. This
resulted in an environment where certain personnel could have unmonitored access to financial
systems and data beyond that required to perform their individual job responsibilities.
We concluded that these control weaknesses, while they did not result in adjustments to the
2007 annual or interim consolidated financial statements, when aggregated, result in a reasonable
possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim consolidated financial statements
will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Accordingly, our management has determined
that this condition constituted a material weakness and concluded that our internal control over
financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2007. We also reported the existence of
material weaknesses and the conclusion that our internal controls were not effective as of December
31, 2006, December 31, 2005 and December 31, 2004 as discussed in our Annual Reports on Form 10-K
filed with respect to those fiscal years.
During 2007 and 2008 we have continued remediation activities intended to improve our internal
controls and procedures; however, there has not been adequate time for us to conclude that the
material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting described in our Annual Report
for the year ended December 31, 2007, has been fully remediated. Therefore, our management has
concluded that, as of June 30, 2008, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.
Accordingly, while we have taken actions to address these weaknesses, additional measures may
be necessary, and these measures, along with other measures we expect to take to improve our
internal controls, may not be sufficient to address the issues identified by us or ensure that our
internal controls are effective. If we are unable to correct weaknesses in internal controls in a
timely manner, our ability to record, process, summarize and report reliable financial information
within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC will be adversely affected. This
failure could materially and adversely impact our business, our financial condition and the market
value of our securities.
40
We are exposed to risks associated with acts of God, terrorists and others, as well as fires,
explosions, wars, riots, accidents, embargoes, natural disasters, strikes and other work stoppages,
quarantines and other governmental actions, and other events or circumstances that are beyond our
control.
Ferro Corporation is exposed to risks from various events that are beyond its control, which
may have significant effects on its results of operations. While we attempt to mitigate these risks
through appropriate insurance, contingency planning and other means, we may not be able to
anticipate all risks or to reasonably or cost-effectively manage those risks that we do anticipate.
As a result, our results of operations could be adversely affected by circumstances or events in
ways that are significant and/or long lasting.
The risks and uncertainties identified above are not the only risks that we face. Additional
risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial
also may adversely affect us. If any known or unknown risks and uncertainties develop into actual
events, these developments could have material adverse effects on our financial position, results
of operations, and cash flows.
41
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Not applicable.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not applicable.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on April 25, 2008, there were a total of 41,841,303
shares of common stock represented either in person or by proxy. The shareholders elected four
Directors to the Ferro Corporation Board of Directors, Sandra Austin Crayton, Richard J. Hipple,
William B. Lawrence and Dennis W. Sullivan, to serve on the Board until the annual meeting in the
year 2011. The results of the voting for Directors were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
|
Withheld Authority |
|
Sandra Austin Crayton |
|
|
38,495,034 |
|
|
|
3,346,269 |
|
Richard J. Hipple |
|
|
39,028,226 |
|
|
|
2,813,077 |
|
William B. Lawrence |
|
|
37,861,693 |
|
|
|
3,979,610 |
|
Dennis W. Sullivan |
|
|
37,787,345 |
|
|
|
4,053,958 |
|
The terms of office for Michael H. Bulkin, Jennie S. Hwang, Ph.D., James F. Kirsch, Michael F.
Mee, Perry W. Premdas, and William J. Sharp continued after the meeting.
Item 5. Other Information
Not applicable.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
|
The exhibits listed in the attached Exhibit Index are filed pursuant to Item 6 of Form 10-Q. |
42
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
FERRO CORPORATION
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: August 5, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James F. Kirsch
|
|
|
James F. Kirsch |
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
Date: August 5, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Sallie B. Bailey |
|
|
Sallie B. Bailey |
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
43
EXHIBIT INDEX
The following exhibits are filed with this report or are incorporated here by reference to a
prior filing in accordance with Rule 12b-32 under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934.
Exhibit:
3 |
|
Articles of Incorporation and by-laws |
|
3.1 |
|
Eleventh Amended Articles of Incorporation. (Reference is made to Exhibit 3(a) to Ferro
Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, which Exhibit
is incorporated here by reference.) |
|
3.2 |
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Eleventh Amended Articles of Incorporation of Ferro
Corporation filed December 28, 1994. (Reference is made to Exhibit 3(b) to Ferro Corporations
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, which Exhibit is incorporated
here by reference.) |
|
3.3 |
|
Certificate of Amendment to the Eleventh Amended Articles of Incorporation of Ferro filed
June 19, 1998. (Reference is made to Exhibit 3(c) to Ferro Corporations Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, which Exhibit is incorporated here by reference.) |
|
3.4 |
|
Ferro Corporation Code of Regulations. (Reference is made to Exhibit 3.01 to Ferro
Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 8, 2006, which Exhibit is
incorporated here by reference.) |
|
4 |
|
Instruments defining rights of security holders, including indentures |
|
4.1 |
|
The rights of the holders of Ferros Debt Securities issued and to be issued pursuant to an
Indenture between Ferro and J. P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association
(successor-in-interest to Chase Manhattan Trust Company, National Association) as Trustee, are
described in the Indenture, dated March 25, 1998. (Reference is made to Exhibit 4(b) to Ferro
Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, which Exhibit
is incorporated here by reference.) |
|
4.2 |
|
Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2006, made by Ferro Corporation and each
U.S. Subsidiary, as Grantors, in favor of J. P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association, as
Trustee, for the benefit of the Trustee and the Holders under the Indentures. (Reference is
made to Exhibit 10.3 to Ferro Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 12, 2006,
which Exhibit is incorporated here by reference.) |
|
4.3 |
|
Collateral Sharing Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2006, among National City Bank, as
Collateral Agent under the Credit Agreement, J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association,
as Trustee under the Indentures, and Ferro Corporation and each other Person listed on the
signature pages, as Obligors. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.4 to Ferro Corporations
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 12, 2006, which Exhibit is incorporated here by
reference.) |
|
4.4 |
|
Officers Certificate dated December 20, 2001, pursuant to Section 301 of the Indenture dated
as of March 25, 1998, between the Company and J. P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association
(the successor-in-interest to Chase Manhattan Trust Company, National Association), as Trustee
(excluding exhibits thereto). (Reference is made to Exhibit 4.2 to Ferro Corporations Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, which Exhibit is incorporated here
by reference.) |
|
4.5 |
|
Form of Global Note
(91/8% Senior Notes due 2009). (Reference is made to Exhibit 4.3 to Ferro
Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006, which Exhibit
is incorporated here by reference.) |
|
|
|
The Company agrees, upon request, to furnish to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission a
copy of any instrument authorizing long-term debt that does not authorize debt in excess of
10% of the total assets of the Company and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. |
44
10 |
|
Material Contracts |
|
10.1 |
|
Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2008, among Ferro Color & Glass Corporation, Ferro
Pfanstiehl Laboratories, Inc. and Ferro Corporation. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.1 to
Ferro Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 7, 2008, which Exhibit is
incorporated here by reference.) |
|
10.2 |
|
Amended and Restated Purchase and Contribution Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2008, between
Ferro Corporation and Ferro Finance Corporation. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.2 to Ferro
Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 7, 2008, which Exhibit is incorporated
here by reference.) |
|
10.3 |
|
Second Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 1, 2008, among
Ferro Finance Corporation, as Seller, and CAFCO, LLC, as the Investor, and Citibank, N.A., as
a Bank, Citicorp North America, Inc., as the Agent, Ferro Color & Glass Corporation and Ferro
Pfanstiehl Laboratories, Inc., each as an Originator, and Ferro Corporation, as Originator and
Collection Agent and Originator. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.3 to Ferro Corporations
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 7, 2008, which Exhibit is incorporated here by
reference.) |
|
10.4 |
|
Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of
June 3, 2008, among Ferro Finance Corporation, as Seller; CAFCO, LLC, as the Investor;
Citibank, N.A., as a Bank; Citicorp North America, Inc., as the Agent; Ferro Color & Glass
Corporation and Ferro Pfanstiehl Laboratories, Inc., each as an Originator; and Ferro
Corporation, as Originator and Collection Agent. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro
Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 16, 2008, which Exhibit is incorporated
here by reference.) |
|
10.5 |
|
Amendment No. 2 to Second Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of
June 10, 2008, among Ferro Finance Corporation, as Seller; CAFCO, LLC, as the Investor;
Citibank, N.A., as a Bank; Citicorp North America, Inc., as the Agent; Ferro Color & Glass
Corporation and Ferro Pfanstiehl Laboratories, Inc., each as an Originator; and Ferro
Corporation, as Originator and Collection Agent. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.2 to Ferro
Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 16, 2008, which Exhibit is incorporated
here by reference.) |
|
10.6 |
|
Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated June 12, 2008, among Ferro
Corporation; Credit Suisse, Cayman Islands Branch, as term loan administrative agent; National
City Bank, as revolving loan administrative agent. (Reference is made to Exhibit 10.1 to Ferro
Corporations Current Report on Form 8-K, filed June 18, 2008, which Exhibit is incorporated
here by reference.) |
|
31.1 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a). |
|
31.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a). |
|
32.1 |
|
Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350. |
|
32.2 |
|
Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 1350. |
45