20-F
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 20-F
ANNUAL REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
Commission File Number 1-15106
|
|
Commission File Number: 333-14168 |
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
|
|
Petrobras International Finance Company |
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) |
|
|
|
Brazilian Petroleum Corporation PETROBRAS |
|
|
(Translation of registrants name into English) |
|
|
|
|
|
The Federative Republic of Brazil
|
|
Cayman Island |
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(Jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
|
|
|
|
Harbour Place |
|
|
103 South Church Street, 4th floor |
Avenida República do Chile, 65
|
|
P.O. Box 1034GT BWI |
20031-912 Rio de Janeiro RJ
|
|
George Town, Grand Cayman |
Brazil
|
|
Cayman Islands |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class: |
|
Name of each exchange on which registered: |
PETROBRAS Common Shares, without par value*
PETROBRAS American Depositary Shares (as
evidenced by
American Depositary Receipts), each representing
4 Common Shares
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
|
|
|
PETROBRAS Preferred Shares, without par value*
PETROBRAS American Depositary Shares (as
evidenced by
American Depositary Receipts), each representing
4 Preferred Shares
|
|
New York Stock Exchange |
|
|
|
* |
|
Not for trading, but only in connection with the registration of American Depositary
Shares, pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission. |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act:
Title of each class:
PifCo U.S.$500,000,000 9.125% Senior Notes due 2007
PifCo U.S.$450,000,000 9.875% Senior Notes due 2008
PifCo U.S.$400,000,000 9.00% Global Step-Up Notes due 2008
PifCo U.S.$600,000,000 9.750% Senior Notes due 2011
PifCo U.S.$750,000,000 9.125% Global Notes due 2013
PifCo U.S.$750,000,000 8.375% Global Notes due 2018
PifCo U.S.$600,000,000 7.75% Global Notes due 2014
PifCo U.S.$899,053,000 6.125% Global Notes due 2016
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the issuers classes of capital or common stock
as of the close of the period covered by this Annual Report :
At December 31, 2006, there were outstanding:
2,536,673,672 PETROBRAS Common Shares, without par value
1,850,364,698 PETROBRAS Preferred Shares, without par value
300,050,000 PifCo Common Shares
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined by Rule 405 of
the Securities Act.
Yes þ No o
If this report is an annual or transitional report, indicate by check mark if the registrant is not
required to file reports pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ [Petrobras] Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer þ [PifCo]
Indicate by check mark which financial statement item the registrant has elected to follow.
Item 17 o Item 18 þ
If this is an annual report, indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
Many statements made in this annual report are forward-looking statements within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, that are not based on historical facts and are not assurances of
future results. Many of the forward-looking statements contained in this annual report may be
identified by the use of forward-looking words, such as believe, expect, anticipate,
should, planned, estimate and potential, among others. We have made forward-looking
statements that address, among other things, our:
|
|
|
regional marketing and expansion strategy; |
|
|
|
|
drilling and other exploration activities; |
|
|
|
|
import and export activities; |
|
|
|
|
projected and targeted capital expenditures and other costs, commitments and revenues; |
|
|
|
|
liquidity; and |
|
|
|
|
development of additional revenue sources. |
Because these forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, there are important
factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by
these forward-looking statements. These factors include:
|
|
|
general economic and business conditions, including crude oil and other commodity
prices, refining margins and prevailing exchange rates; |
|
|
|
|
international and Brazilian political, economic and social developments; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to find, acquire or gain access to additional reserves and to
successfully develop our current ones; |
|
|
|
|
uncertainties inherent in making estimates of our reserves; |
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain financing; |
|
|
|
|
competition; |
|
|
|
|
technical difficulties in the operation of our equipment and the provision of our services; |
|
|
|
|
changes in, or failure to comply with, governmental regulations; |
|
|
|
|
receipt of governmental approvals and licenses; |
|
|
|
|
military operations, terrorist acts, wars or embargoes; |
|
|
|
|
the cost and availability of adequate insurance coverage; and |
|
|
|
|
other factors discussed below under Risk Factors. |
These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to certain risks,
uncertainties and assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, our actual results could
differ materially from those expressed or forecast in any forward-looking statements as a result of
a variety of factors, including those in Risk Factors.
All forward-looking statements are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary
statement, and you should not place reliance on any forward-looking statement contained in this
annual report.
2
The crude oil and natural gas reserve data presented or described in this annual report are
only estimates and our actual production, revenues and expenditures with respect to our reserves
may materially differ from these estimates.
Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms Petrobras, we, us, and our refer to
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. PETROBRAS and its consolidated subsidiaries and special purpose
companies, including Petrobras International Finance Company. The term PifCo refers to Petrobras
International Finance Company and its subsidiaries.
CERTAIN TERMS AND CONVENTIONS
A glossary of petroleum industry terms, a table of abbreviations and a conversion table are
presented beginning on page 194.
PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION
In this annual report, references to real, reais or R$ are to Brazilian reais and
references to U.S. dollars or U.S.$ are to the United States dollars. Certain figures included
in this annual report have been subject to rounding adjustments; accordingly, figures shown as
totals in certain tables may not be an exact arithmetic aggregation of the figures that precede
them.
Petrobras
The audited consolidated financial statements of Petrobras and our consolidated subsidiaries
as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and for each of the three years in the period ended December 31,
2006, and the accompanying notes, contained in this annual report have been presented in U.S.
dollars and prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, or U.S.
GAAP. See Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects and Note 2(a) to our audited
consolidated financial statements. We also publish financial statements in Brazil in reais in
accordance with the accounting principles required by Law No. 6404/76, as amended, or Brazilian
Corporate Law and the regulations promulgated by the Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (Brazilian
Securities Commission, or the CVM), or Brazilian GAAP, which differs in significant respects from
U.S. GAAP.
Certain prior year amounts for 2005 and 2004 have been reclassified to conform to current year
presentation standards. These reclassifications had no impact on our net income.
Our functional currency is the Brazilian real. As described more fully in Note 2(a) to our
audited consolidated financial statements, the U.S. dollar amounts as of the dates and for the
periods presented in our audited consolidated financial statements have been recalculated or
translated from the real amounts in accordance with the criteria set forth in Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 52 of the U.S. Financial Accounting Standards Board, or SFAS 52.
U.S. dollar amounts presented in this annual report have been translated from reais at the
period-end exchange rate for balance sheet items and the average exchange rate prevailing during
the period for income statement and cash flow items.
Unless the context otherwise indicates:
|
|
|
historical data contained in this annual report that were not derived from the
consolidated financial statements have been translated from reais on a similar basis; |
|
|
|
|
forward-looking amounts, including estimated future capital expenditures, have all
been based on our Petrobras 2015 Strategic Plan, which covers the period from 2004 to
2015, which we refer to as the Petrobras 2015 Strategic Plan, and on our 2007-2011
Business Plan, and have been projected on a constant basis and have been translated
from reais in 2007 at an estimated average exchange rate of R$2.50 to U.S.$1.00, and
future calculations involving an assumed price of crude oil have been calculated using
a Brent crude oil price of U.S.$55 per barrel for 2007, and U.S.$40 per barrel for 2008
and U.S.$35 per barrel for 2009 and thereafter, adjusted for our quality and location
differences, unless otherwise stated; and |
3
|
|
|
estimated future capital expenditures are based on the most recently budgeted
amounts, which may not have been adjusted to reflect all factors that could affect such
amounts. |
PifCo
PifCos functional currency is the U.S. dollar. Substantially all of PifCos sales are made in
U.S. dollars and all of its debt is denominated in U.S. dollars. Accordingly, PifCos audited
consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and for each of the three years
in the period ended December 31, 2006, and the accompanying notes contained in this annual report
have been presented in U.S. dollars and prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and include PifCos
wholly-owned subsidiaries: Petrobras Europe Limited, Petrobras Finance Limited, Bear Insurance
Company Limited BEAR and Petrobras Singapore Private Limited.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
PESA Issues Notes
On May 7, 2007, Petrobras Energía S.A. (PESA), a company indirectly controlled by us, issued
notes amounting to U.S.$300 million, with a term of 10 years and bearing interest at 5.875% per
year. Interest will be paid semi-annually and the principal will be paid in a single installment
at maturity. The issuance was made both in the Argentine market and in the international market.
Acquisition of Assets of the Ipiranga Group
On March 18, 2007, Ultrapar Participações S.A. (Ultrapar) acquired, as a commission agent
acting on behalf of Braskem S.A. (Braskem) and us, the total share capital of the controlling
shares of Refinaria de Petróleo Ipiranga S.A. (RPI), Distribuidora de Produtos de Petróleo
Ipiranga S.A. (DPPI) and Companhia Brasileira de Petróleo Ipiranga (CBPI) (together, the
Ipiranga Group), including petrochemical, refining and distribution assets. Under the investment
agreement, we and Braskem acknowledged and agreed to the terms of the proposed transaction.
After completion of the proposed acquisition, the businesses of the Ipiranga Group will be
managed by Ultrapar, Braskem and us. Ultrapar will hold the retail businesses located in the South
and Southeast regions of Brazil, and we will hold the retail businesses located in the North,
Northeast and Central-West regions of Brazil. Besides these, we will hold a 100% of the share
capital of IASA (a subsidiary of the group that produces asphalt). We and Braskem will jointly
hold the petrochemical assets, represented by Ipiranga Química S.A. and Ipiranga Petroquímica S.A.
(IPQ) and for IPQs stake in Copesul Companhia Petroquímica do Sul (Copesul), in the
proportion of 40% and 60%, respectively. The assets related to refining operations will be equally
shared between Ultrapar, Braskem and us.
The Ipiranga transaction is expected to close during the fourth quarter of 2007. The
transaction is expected to take place in four phases. In the first phase, Ultrapar acquired RPI,
DPPI and CBPI from these entities controlling shareholders for a purchase price of R$2,000.2
million. In the second phase Ultrapar will make a mandatory tender offer for the remaining
outstanding voting shares of RPI, DPPI and CBPI, as required under Brazilian law. In the next
phase, Ultrapar will issue preferred shares in exchanges for the outstanding preferred shares of
RPI, DPPI and CBPI. In the fourth phase Ultrapar will delivery part of the distribution assets to
us and total petrochemical assets to us and Braskem.
The total value estimated for the operation is U.S.$4.0 billion and we are expected to pay
approximately U.S.$1.3 billion for our interest. The transaction will be subject to the approval
of the Brazilian anti-trust authorities (CADE Administrative Board for Economic Defense), the
Secretary for Economic Rights and the Secretary for Economic Monitoring.
4
Acquisition of Refinery Pasadena Texas
In September 2006, we announced the closing of the acquisition by Petrobras America, Inc., or
PAI, our wholly-owned subsidiary in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, of 50% of Pasadena Refining System
Inc. (PRSI), formerly the Crown Refinery in Pasadena, Texas, from Astra Oil Company, a U.S.-based
refining and trading company owned by the Belgian group Compagnie Nationale à Portefeuille SA-CNP.
The purchase price was approximately U.S.$416 million. PAI and Astra are conducting studies to
expand its capacity and install units that will enable it to process heavy oils and deliver high
quality products.
Electrical Energy
Petrobras is expected to sign an agreement with the National Electrical Energy Agency (Agência
Nacional de Energia Elétrica, or ANEEL), in an effort to increase capacity in 24 gas-fired power
plants. This agreement is highlighted as a part of our strategy to develop the Brazilian natural
gas market as an integrated energy company with a goal of making the gas-fired power business
profitable. The actions to be undertaken before 2011 will allow for an additional electrical
energy capacity of 4 GW, which are expected to be reached not just through a greater supply of gas,
but also through the conversion of plants into those that can support biocombustible operations and
through the availability of plants that can process combustible oil. We understand that our
actions, along with the actions of other companies, with the contracting for expected demand and
the reserve capacity for energy generation, will allow the electrical business greater operational
stability.
PRESENTATION OF INFORMATION CONCERNING RESERVES
The estimates of our proved reserves of crude oil and natural gas as of December 31, 2006,
included in this annual report have been calculated according to the technical definitions required
by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC. DeGolyer and MacNaughton provided
estimates of most of our net domestic reserves as of December 31, 2006. All reserve estimates
involve some degree of uncertainty. See Item 3. Key InformationRisk FactorsRisks Relating to Our
Operations for a description of the risks relating to our reserves and our reserve estimates.
We also file oil and gas reserve estimates with governmental authorities in most of the
countries in which we operate. On January 12, 2007, we filed reserve estimates for Brazil with the
Agência Nacional de Petróleo (the National Petroleum Agency, or the ANP), in accordance with
Brazilian rules and regulations, totaling 11.671 billion barrels of crude oil and condensate and
12,492.9 billion cubic feet of natural gas. The reserve estimates we filed with the ANP and those
provided herein differ by approximately 30.1%. This difference is due to (1) the ANP requirement
that we estimate proved reserves through the technical abandonment of production wells, as opposed
to limiting reserve estimates to the life of our concession contracts as required by Rule 4-10 of
Regulation S-X and (2) different technical criteria for booking proved reserves, including the use
of 3-D seismic data to establish proved reserves in Brazil.
We also file reserve estimates from our international operations with various governmental
agencies under the guidelines of the Society of Petroleum Engineers, or SPE. The aggregate reserve
estimates from our international operations, under SPE guidelines, amounted to 0.66 billion barrels
of crude oil and NGLs and 3,679 billion cubic feet of natural gas, which differs by approximately
44 percent from reserve estimates provided herein because the SPEs different technical guidelines
allow for (1) the booking of reserves in Bolivia beyond the life of certain gas sale contracts and
(2) the booking of reserves in Nigeria based on 3-D seismic data and certain oil recovery
techniques, such as fluid injection, based on analogous fields.
Bolivia and Venezuela implemented new nationalization measures during 2006. The
nationalization measures in Bolivia and Venezuela caused a reduction of our reserves in these
countries in 2006. The new regulation in Venezuela reduced our reserves as Petróleos de Venezuela
S.A. (PDVSA) became the main controller of the companies, created to operate the fields with
private companies. Due to new government regulations, our reserves in Bolivia were also reduced. In
Nigeria, the consortium in charge of the Akpo field included Total, Petrobras and a Nigerian
private company called SAPETRO. The agreement underwritten by these companies
established that Total and Petrobras carry the investment cost of the third party and it would
be compensated in the
5
future with SAPETROs production/reserves. Throughout 2006, SAPETRO sold its
participation to a Chinese oil company and, as part of this agreement, Petrobras and Total were
reimbursed for their past carrying investments. In addition, in Nigeria, due to certain farm-in
arrangements in the Akpo field, we reduced our expectations for future production. See Item
4.Information on the CompanyInternational.
ITEM 1. IDENTITY OF DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND ADVISERS
Not applicable.
ITEM 2. OFFER STATISTICS AND EXPECTED TIMETABLE
Not applicable.
ITEM 3. KEY INFORMATION
Selected Financial Data
Petrobras
The following table sets forth our selected consolidated financial data, presented in U.S.
dollars and prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The data for each of the five years in the
period ended December 31, 2006 has been derived from our audited consolidated financial
statements, which were audited by KPMG Auditores Independentes for the year ended December 31,
2006, by Ernst & Young Auditores Independentes S/S for each of the years ended December 31, 2005,
2004 and 2003, and by PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes for the year ended December
31, 2002. The information below should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to, our audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes
and Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.
Certain prior year amounts for 2005 and 2004 have been reclassified to conform to current year
presentation standards. These reclassifications had no impact on our net income.
6
BALANCE SHEET DATA PETROBRAS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
12,688 |
|
|
$ |
9,871 |
|
|
$ |
6,856 |
|
|
$ |
8,344 |
|
|
$ |
3,301 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
6,311 |
|
|
|
6,184 |
|
|
|
4,285 |
|
|
|
2,905 |
|
|
|
2,267 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
6,573 |
|
|
|
5,305 |
|
|
|
4,904 |
|
|
|
2,947 |
|
|
|
2,540 |
|
Recoverable taxes |
|
|
2,593 |
|
|
|
2,087 |
|
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
917 |
|
|
|
672 |
|
Advances to suppliers |
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
422 |
|
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
794 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
1,842 |
|
|
|
1,685 |
|
|
|
1,484 |
|
|
|
1,817 |
|
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
30,955 |
|
|
|
25,784 |
|
|
|
19,426 |
|
|
|
17,434 |
|
|
|
10,322 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
58,897 |
|
|
|
45,920 |
|
|
|
37,020 |
|
|
|
30,805 |
|
|
|
18,224 |
|
Investments in non-consolidated companies and other investments |
|
|
3,262 |
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
|
1,862 |
|
|
|
1,173 |
|
|
|
334 |
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivables, net |
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
369 |
|
Advances to suppliers |
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
416 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
Petroleum and Alcohol Account-Receivable from the
Brazilian government(1) |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
182 |
|
Government securities |
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
Unrecognized pension obligation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
Restricted deposits for legal proceedings and guarantees |
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
699 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
Recoverable taxes |
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
Investments PEPSA and PELSA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,073 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
Fair value asset of gas hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
665 |
|
|
|
754 |
|
|
|
510 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
5,566 |
|
|
|
5,124 |
|
|
|
4,774 |
|
|
|
4,200 |
|
|
|
3,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
98,680 |
|
|
$ |
78,638 |
|
|
$ |
63,082 |
|
|
$ |
53,612 |
|
|
$ |
32,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
$ |
5,418 |
|
|
$ |
3,838 |
|
|
$ |
3,284 |
|
|
$ |
2,261 |
|
|
$ |
1,702 |
|
Taxes payable |
|
|
3,357 |
|
|
|
3,423 |
|
|
|
2,569 |
|
|
|
2,305 |
|
|
|
1,801 |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
1,293 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
1,329 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
2,106 |
|
|
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
Current portion of project financings |
|
|
2,182 |
|
|
|
2,413 |
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
|
|
378 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
Dividends and interest on capital payable |
|
|
3,693 |
|
|
|
3,068 |
|
|
|
1,900 |
|
|
|
1,955 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
Payroll and related charges |
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
918 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
283 |
|
Advances from customers |
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
Employees postretirement benefits obligations Pension |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
1,236 |
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
1,176 |
|
|
|
823 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
21,786 |
|
|
|
18,161 |
|
|
|
13,328 |
|
|
|
12,037 |
|
|
|
7,263 |
|
Long-term liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
10,510 |
|
|
|
11,503 |
|
|
|
12,145 |
|
|
|
11,888 |
|
|
|
6,987 |
|
Project financings |
|
|
4,192 |
|
|
|
3,629 |
|
|
|
4,399 |
|
|
|
5,066 |
|
|
|
3,800 |
|
Employees postretirement benefits obligations Pension |
|
|
4,645 |
|
|
|
3,627 |
|
|
|
2,915 |
|
|
|
1,895 |
|
|
|
1,363 |
|
Employees postretirement benefits obligation Health Care |
|
|
5,433 |
|
|
|
3,004 |
|
|
|
2,137 |
|
|
|
1,580 |
|
|
|
1,060 |
|
Capital lease obligations |
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
1,069 |
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
1,907 |
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
2,916 |
|
|
|
2,166 |
|
|
|
1,558 |
|
|
|
1,122 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
Gas-fired power liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
1,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred Purchase Incentive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for abandonment of wells |
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term liabilities |
|
|
30,629 |
|
|
|
26,486 |
|
|
|
26,371 |
|
|
|
24,872 |
|
|
|
15,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
1,966 |
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
(136 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars) |
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares authorized and issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred share |
|
|
7,718 |
|
|
|
4,772 |
|
|
|
4,772 |
|
|
|
2,973 |
|
|
|
2,459 |
|
Common share |
|
|
10,959 |
|
|
|
6,929 |
|
|
|
6,929 |
|
|
|
4,289 |
|
|
|
3,761 |
|
Capital reserve and other comprehensive income |
|
|
25,622 |
|
|
|
21,216 |
|
|
|
10,805 |
|
|
|
9,074 |
|
|
|
3,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Shareholders equity |
|
|
44,299 |
|
|
|
32,917 |
|
|
|
22,506 |
|
|
|
16,336 |
|
|
|
9,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and Shareholders equity |
|
$ |
98,680 |
|
|
$ |
78,638 |
|
|
$ |
63,082 $ |
|
|
|
53,612 |
|
|
$ |
32,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Prior to July 29, 1998, the Petroleum and Alcohol Account reflected the difference between
our actual cost for imported crude oil and oil products and the price set by the Brazilian
government, as well as the net effects on us of the administration of certain subsidies and of
our fuel alcohol activities. From July 29, 1998 until December 31, 2001, the Petroleum and
Alcohol Account was required to be adjusted by the Specific Parcel Price-PPE and certain fuel
transportation and other reimbursable costs. As from the price deregulation on January 2,
2002, the Petroleum and Alcohol Account reflected only the outstanding balance owed to us by
the Brazilian government and adjustments resulting from monetary correction and audits to the
Account. See Item 4. Information on the CompanyRegulation of the Oil and Gas Industry in
BrazilPrice RegulationThe Petroleum and Alcohol Account. |
8
INCOME STATEMENT DATA PETROBRAS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 (8) |
|
|
2004 (8) |
|
|
2003(8) |
|
|
2002(8) |
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars, except for share and per share data) |
|
Sales of products and services |
|
$ |
93,893 |
|
|
$ |
74,065 |
|
|
$ |
51,954 |
|
|
$ |
42,690 |
|
|
$ |
32,987 |
|
Value-added and other taxes on sales and services |
|
|
(17,906 |
) |
|
|
(14,694 |
) |
|
|
(10,906 |
) |
|
|
(9,527 |
) |
|
|
(7,739 |
) |
CIDE(1) |
|
|
(3,640 |
) |
|
|
(3,047 |
) |
|
|
(2,620 |
) |
|
|
(2,249 |
) |
|
|
(2,636 |
) |
Net operating revenues |
|
|
72,347 |
|
|
|
56,324 |
|
|
|
38,428 |
|
|
|
30,914 |
|
|
|
22,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
40,061 |
|
|
|
29,828 |
|
|
|
21,279 |
|
|
|
15,533 |
|
|
|
11,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization(2)(3) |
|
|
3,673 |
|
|
|
2,926 |
|
|
|
2,481 |
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration, including exploratory dry holes(2) |
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
4,989 |
|
|
|
4,474 |
|
|
|
2,901 |
|
|
|
2,091 |
|
|
|
1,741 |
|
Other operating expense |
|
|
1,829 |
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
793 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
51,486 |
|
|
|
40,245 |
|
|
|
28,067 |
|
|
|
20,518 |
|
|
|
15,834 |
|
Financial income |
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
|
|
1,142 |
|
Financial expense |
|
|
(1,340 |
) |
|
|
(1,189 |
) |
|
|
(1,733 |
) |
|
|
(1,247 |
) |
|
|
(774 |
) |
Monetary and exchange variation on monetary
assets and liabilities, net |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
509 |
|
|
|
(2,068 |
) |
Employee benefit expense |
|
|
(1,017 |
) |
|
|
(994 |
) |
|
|
(650 |
) |
|
|
(595 |
) |
|
|
(451 |
) |
Other non-operating income (expense), net(4) |
|
|
(583 |
) |
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
(449 |
) |
|
|
(924 |
) |
|
|
(1,395 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes,
minority interest, extraordinary item and
accounting change |
|
|
19,161 |
|
|
|
14,592 |
|
|
|
8,935 |
|
|
|
8,773 |
|
|
|
3,232 |
|
Income tax (expense) benefit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
(5,011 |
) |
|
|
(4,223 |
) |
|
|
(2,114 |
) |
|
|
(2,599 |
) |
|
|
(1,269 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
(680 |
) |
|
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense |
|
|
(5,691 |
) |
|
|
(4,441 |
) |
|
|
(2,231 |
) |
|
|
(2,663 |
) |
|
|
(1,153 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interests in results of consolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(514 |
) |
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before extraordinary item and effect of
change in accounting principle |
|
|
12,826 |
|
|
|
10,186 |
|
|
|
6,190 |
|
|
|
5,862 |
|
|
|
2,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary gain net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle, net of taxes(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
697 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the year |
|
$ |
12,826 |
|
|
$ |
10,344 |
|
|
$ |
6,190 |
|
|
$ |
6,559 |
|
|
$ |
2,311 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares Outstanding:(5) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common(5) |
|
|
2,536,673,672 |
|
|
|
2,536,673,672 |
|
|
|
2,536,673,672 |
|
|
|
2,536,673,672 |
|
|
|
2,536,673,672 |
|
Preferred(5) |
|
|
1,850,364,698 |
|
|
|
1,849,478,028 |
|
|
|
1,849,478,028 |
|
|
|
1,849,478,028 |
|
|
|
1.807.742.676 |
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share:(5)(6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common and Preferred Shares(5)(6) |
|
$ |
2.92 |
|
|
$ |
2.36 |
|
|
$ |
1.41 |
|
|
$ |
1.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.53 |
|
Common and Preferred ADS(5)(6) |
|
$ |
11.68 |
|
|
$ |
9.44 |
|
|
$ |
5.64 |
|
|
$ |
6.00 |
|
|
$ |
2.12 |
|
Cash dividends per(5)(7): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common and Preferred shares(5)(7) |
|
$ |
0.84 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
Common and Preferred ADS(5)(7) |
|
$ |
3.36 |
|
|
$ |
2.72 |
|
|
$ |
1.68 |
|
|
$ |
1.48 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
CIDE is an excise tax payable to the Brazilian government, required to be paid by
producers, blenders and importers upon sales and purchases of specified oil and fuel products
at a set amount for different products based on the unit of measurement typically used for
such products. |
|
(2) |
|
In 2002, U.S.$284 million in abandonment costs were recognized as depreciation, depletion and
amortization in accordance with SFAS 19. In 2003, as a result of our adoption of SFAS 143 -
Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations, depreciation on the asset retirement obligation
was recorded under depreciation, depletion and amortization, while accretion expense was
recorded under exploration, including exploratory dry holes. This change resulted in U.S.$43
million in abandonment costs being recognized as exploration, including exploratory dry holes
in 2003. The cumulative effect of adoption is recorded separately. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes impairment charge. |
|
(4) |
|
Amounts reported include financial charges in respect of the Petroleum and Alcohol Account of
U.S.$2 million in 2002. |
9
|
|
|
(5) |
|
On July 22, 2005, our Board of Directors authorized a 4 for 1 stock split. For purposes of
comparison, the weighted average number of shares outstanding, net income per share/ADS and
cash dividends per share/ADS were restated for periods prior to the stock split, which became
effective as of September 1, 2005. See note 10 to our audited consolidated financial
statements. |
|
(6) |
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share for 2003 reflect our adoption of SFAS 143. That change
in accounting principle altered our 2003 basic and diluted earnings per share from U.S.$1.34
(before effect of change in accounting principle) to U.S.$1.50 (after effect of change in
accounting principle). And for 2005, the extraordinary item altered our basic and diluted
earnings per share from U.S.$2.32 (before effect of extraordinary item) to U.S.$2.36 (after
effect of extraordinary item). |
|
(7) |
|
Represents dividends declared in respect of the earnings of each period. |
|
(8) |
|
Certain amounts from prior years have been reclassified to conform to the current years
presentation. These reclassifications had no impact on the Companys net income. |
10
PifCo
The following table sets forth PifCos selected consolidated financial data, presented in U.S.
dollars and prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. The data for each of the five years in the
period ended December 31, 2006 have been derived from PifCos audited consolidated financial
statements, which were audited by KPMG Auditores Independentes for the year ended December 31,
2006, by Ernst & Young Auditores Independentes S/S for each of the years ended December 31, 2005,
2004 and 2003 and by PricewaterhouseCoopers Auditores Independentes for the year ended December
31, 2002. The information below should be read in conjunction with, and is qualified in its
entirety by reference to, PifCos audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying
notes and Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME STATEMENT AND BALANCE SHEET DATA - PifCo |
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars) |
|
Income Statement Data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of crude oil and oil products and
Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Parties |
|
$ |
14,236.5 |
|
|
$ |
13,974.4 |
|
|
$ |
10,118.4 |
|
|
$ |
5,543.0 |
|
|
$ |
5,375.5 |
|
Others |
|
|
7,833.3 |
|
|
|
3,161.7 |
|
|
|
2,237.2 |
|
|
|
1,432.5 |
|
|
|
1,014.7 |
|
Lease income(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
22,069.8 |
|
|
$ |
17,136.1 |
|
|
$ |
12,355.6 |
|
|
$ |
6,975.5 |
|
|
$ |
6,426.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Parties |
|
|
(8,122.0 |
) |
|
|
(7,780.3 |
) |
|
|
(4,391.3 |
) |
|
|
(2,851.4 |
) |
|
|
(2,409.0 |
) |
Others |
|
|
(13,778.5 |
) |
|
|
(9,203.0 |
) |
|
|
(7,844.7 |
) |
|
|
(4,068.7 |
) |
|
|
(3,962.5 |
) |
Lease expense(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24.0 |
) |
Selling, general and Administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties |
|
|
(189.7 |
) |
|
|
(158.1 |
) |
|
|
(98.7 |
) |
|
|
(17.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
(17.7 |
) |
|
|
(7.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,107.9 |
) |
|
|
(17,149.0 |
) |
|
|
(12,335.8 |
) |
|
|
(6,938.7 |
) |
|
|
(6,396.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(38.1 |
) |
|
|
(12.9 |
) |
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
29.6 |
|
Financial income(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Parties |
|
|
999.2 |
|
|
|
765.5 |
|
|
|
568.6 |
|
|
|
401.7 |
|
|
|
201.9 |
|
Others |
|
|
286.0 |
|
|
|
218.5 |
|
|
|
110.2 |
|
|
|
41.2 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,285.2 |
|
|
|
984.0 |
|
|
|
678.8 |
|
|
|
442.9 |
|
|
|
219.6 |
|
Financial expense(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Parties |
|
|
(722.4 |
) |
|
|
(409.8 |
) |
|
|
(169.0 |
) |
|
|
(111.9 |
) |
|
|
(61.3 |
) |
Others |
|
|
(735.4 |
) |
|
|
(589.1 |
) |
|
|
(592.2 |
) |
|
|
(370.8 |
) |
|
|
(253.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
(1,457.8 |
) |
|
|
(998.9 |
) |
|
|
(761.2 |
) |
|
|
(482.7 |
) |
|
|
(314.7 |
) |
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
$ |
(210.5 |
) |
|
$ |
(27.8 |
) |
|
$ |
(59.1 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.0 |
) |
|
$ |
(65.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Data (end of period): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
510.8 |
|
|
$ |
230.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,107.3 |
|
|
$ |
664.2 |
|
|
$ |
260.6 |
|
Trade accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties |
|
|
10,658.9 |
|
|
|
8,681.1 |
|
|
|
7,788.1 |
|
|
|
5,064.5 |
|
|
|
4,837.1 |
|
Others |
|
|
835.4 |
|
|
|
212.7 |
|
|
|
153.6 |
|
|
|
109.4 |
|
|
|
57.1 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties |
|
|
6,354.4 |
|
|
|
3,909.3 |
|
|
|
1,936.9 |
|
|
|
1,726.4 |
|
|
|
1,631.6 |
|
Export Prepayment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties |
|
|
532.2 |
|
|
|
943.9 |
|
|
|
1,414.7 |
|
|
|
1,479.4 |
|
|
|
751.2 |
|
Marketable Securities |
|
|
1,796.9 |
|
|
|
2,248.6 |
|
|
|
1,864.8 |
|
|
|
615.8 |
|
|
|
96.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
21,321.3 |
|
|
|
16,748.9 |
|
|
|
14,670.2 |
|
|
|
10,196.6 |
|
|
|
8,697.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties |
|
|
1,142.9 |
|
|
|
950.7 |
|
|
|
562.1 |
|
|
|
271.0 |
|
|
|
292.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,122.0 |
|
|
|
616.1 |
|
|
|
568.1 |
|
|
|
349.0 |
|
|
|
281.1 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties |
|
|
12,828.5 |
|
|
|
8,080.3 |
|
|
|
6,435.0 |
|
|
|
2,442.8 |
|
|
|
3,688.2 |
|
Short-term financing and current portion of
long-term debt |
|
|
1,205.9 |
|
|
|
891.1 |
|
|
|
680.9 |
|
|
|
1,076.4 |
|
|
|
367.5 |
|
Long-term debt(4) |
|
|
4,640.1 |
|
|
|
5,908.4 |
|
|
|
6,151.8 |
|
|
|
5,825.3 |
|
|
|
3,850.4 |
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
(24.8 |
) |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
35.7 |
|
|
|
94.8 |
|
|
|
43.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
|
21,321.3 |
|
|
|
16,748.9 |
|
|
|
14,670.2 |
|
|
|
10,196.6 |
|
|
|
8,697.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As a result of PifCos transfer of PNBV, its leasing subsidiary, to us in January 2003,
PifCo had no lease income or lease expense in 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Financial income represents primarily the imputed interest realized from PifCos sales of
crude oil and oil products to us and intercompany loans to related parties. |
|
(3) |
|
Financial expense consists primarily of costs incurred by PifCo in financing its activities
in connection with the importation by us of crude oil and oil products. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes capital lease obligations of U.S.$601.7 million at December 31, 2002. |
12
Exchange Rates
Foreign currencies may only be purchased through Brazilian financial institutions authorized
to operate in the exchange market and are subject to registration with the Central Bank electronic
system. The Central Bank of Brazil allows the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate to float freely, and
it has intervened occasionally to control unstable movements in foreign exchange rates. We cannot
predict whether the Central Bank or the Brazilian government will continue to let the real float
freely or will intervene in the exchange rate market through a currency band system or otherwise.
The real depreciated 52.3% in 2002 against the U.S. dollar, before appreciating 18.2% in 2003
and continuing to appreciate 8.1% in 2004, 11.8% in 2005 and 8.7% in 2006. As of June 21, 2007, the
real has appreciated to R$1.920 per U.S.$1.00, representing an appreciation of approximately 10.2%
in 2007 year-to-date. The real may depreciate or appreciate substantially in the future. See
Risk FactorsRisks Relating to Brazil.
The following table provides information on the selling exchange rate, expressed in reais per
U.S. dollar (R$/U.S.$), for the periods indicated. The table uses the commercial selling rate prior
to March 14, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(R$ /U.S.$) |
|
|
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Average (1) |
|
Period End |
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2.371 |
|
|
|
2.059 |
|
|
|
2.175 |
|
|
|
2.138 |
|
2005 |
|
|
2.762 |
|
|
|
2.163 |
|
|
|
2.435 |
|
|
|
2.341 |
|
2004 |
|
|
3.205 |
|
|
|
2.654 |
|
|
|
2.926 |
|
|
|
2.654 |
|
2003 |
|
|
3.662 |
|
|
|
2.822 |
|
|
|
3.075 |
|
|
|
2.889 |
|
2002 |
|
|
3.955 |
|
|
|
2.271 |
|
|
|
2.924 |
|
|
|
3.533 |
|
Month |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 2006 |
|
|
2.187 |
|
|
|
2.135 |
|
|
|
2.156 |
|
|
|
2.167 |
|
December 2006 |
|
|
2.169 |
|
|
|
2.138 |
|
|
|
2.150 |
|
|
|
2.138 |
|
January 2007 |
|
|
2.156 |
|
|
|
2.125 |
|
|
|
2.139 |
|
|
|
2.125 |
|
February 2007 |
|
|
2.118 |
|
|
|
2.077 |
|
|
|
2.096 |
|
|
|
2.118 |
|
March 2007 |
|
|
2.139 |
|
|
|
2.050 |
|
|
|
2.089 |
|
|
|
2.050 |
|
April 2007 |
|
|
2.050 |
|
|
|
2.023 |
|
|
|
2.032 |
|
|
|
2.034 |
|
May 2007 |
|
|
2.034 |
|
|
|
1,929 |
|
|
|
1.986 |
|
|
|
1,929 |
|
June 2007 (through June 21) |
|
|
1.964 |
|
|
|
1.905 |
|
|
|
1.930 |
|
|
|
1.920 |
|
|
|
|
Source: Central Bank of Brazil |
|
(1) |
|
Year-end figures stated for calendar years 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003 and 2002 represent the
average of the month-end exchange rates during the relevant period. The figures provided for
the months of calendar years 2007 and 2006, as well as for the month of June up to and
including June 21, 2007, represent the average of the exchange rates at the close of trading
on each business day during such period. |
Brazilian law provides that, whenever there is a serious imbalance in Brazils balance of
payments or serious reasons to foresee such an imbalance, temporary restrictions on remittances
from Brazil may be imposed by the Brazilian government. These types of measures may be taken by the
Brazilian government in the future, including measures relating to remittances related to our
preferred or common shares or American Depositary Shares, or ADSs. See Risk Factors-Risks Relating
to Brazil.
Risk Factors
Risks Relating to Our Operations
Substantial or extended declines in the prices of crude oil and oil products may have a material
adverse effect on our income.
The majority of our revenue is derived from sales of crude oil and oil products. We do not,
and will not, have control over the factors affecting international prices for crude oil and oil
products. The average prices of Brent crude, an international benchmark oil, were approximately
U.S.$ 65.14 per barrel for 2006, U.S.$54.38 per barrel for 2005 and U.S.$38.21 per barrel
for 2004. Changes in crude oil prices typically result in changes in prices for oil products.
13
Historically, international prices for crude oil and oil products have fluctuated widely as a
result of many factors. These factors include:
|
|
|
global and regional economic and geopolitical developments in crude oil producing
regions, particularly in the Middle East; |
|
|
|
|
the ability of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) to set and
maintain crude oil production levels and defend prices; |
|
|
|
|
global and regional supply and demand for crude oil and oil products; |
|
|
|
|
competition from other energy sources; |
|
|
|
|
domestic and foreign government regulations; and |
|
|
|
|
weather conditions. |
Volatility and uncertainty in international prices for crude oil and oil products may
continue. Substantial or extended declines in international crude oil prices may have a material
adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition, and the value of our
proved reserves. In addition, significant decreases in the price of crude oil may cause us to
reduce or alter the timing of our capital expenditures, and this could adversely affect our
production forecasts in the medium term and our reserve estimates in the future.
Our ability to achieve our long-term growth objectives depends on our ability to discover
additional reserves and successfully develop them, and failure to do so could prevent us from
achieving our long-term goals for growth in production.
Our ability to achieve our long-term growth objectives is highly dependent upon our ability to
discover additional reserves, as well as to successfully develop our current reserves. In addition,
our exploration activities expose us to the inherent risks of drilling, including the risk that we
will not discover commercially productive crude oil or natural gas reserves. The costs of drilling
wells are often uncertain, and numerous factors beyond our control (such as unexpected drilling
conditions, equipment failures or accidents, and shortages or delays in the availability of
drilling rigs and the delivery of equipment) may cause drilling operations to be curtailed, delayed
or cancelled. These risks are heightened when we drill in deep water (between 300 and 1,500 meters
water depth) and ultra deep water (more than 1,500 meters). Deep water drilling represented
approximately 34 % of the exploratory wells we drilled in 2006, a higher proportion than
for many other oil and gas producers.
Unless we conduct successful exploration and development activities or acquire properties
containing proved reserves, or both, our proved reserves will decline as reserves are extracted. If
we fail to gain access to additional reserves we may not achieve our long-term goals for production
growth and our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely affected.
Our crude oil and natural gas reserve estimates involve some degree of uncertainty, which could
adversely affect our ability to generate income.
The proved crude oil and natural gas reserves set forth in this annual report are our
estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids that geological and
engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be recoverable from known reservoirs
under existing economic and operating conditions (i.e., prices and costs as of the date the
estimate is made). Our proved developed crude oil and natural gas reserves are reserves that can be
expected to be recovered through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods.
There are uncertainties in estimating quantities of proved reserves related to prevailing crude oil
and natural gas prices applicable to our production, which may lead us to make revisions to our
reserve estimates. Downward revisions in our reserve estimates could lead to lower future
production, which could have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial
condition.
14
We are subject to numerous environmental and health regulations that have become more stringent in
the recent past and may result in increased liabilities and increased capital expenditures.
Our activities are subject to a wide variety of federal, state and local laws, regulations and
permit requirements relating to the protection of human health and the environment, both in Brazil
and in other jurisdictions in which we operate. In Brazil, we could be exposed to administrative
and criminal sanctions, including warnings, fines and closure orders for non-compliance with these
environmental regulations, which, among other things, limit or prohibit emissions or spills of
toxic substances produced in connection with our operations. In 2006, we experienced spills
totaling 77,402 gallons of crude oil, as compared to 71,141 gallons in 2005 and 140,000
gallons in 2004. As a result of certain of these spills, we were fined by various state and
federal environmental agencies, named the defendant in several civil and criminal suits, and remain
subject to several investigations and potential civil and criminal liabilities. See Item 8.
Financial InformationLegal Proceedings. Waste disposal and emissions regulations may require us
to clean up or retrofit our facilities at substantial cost and could result in substantial
liabilities. The Instituto Brasileiro do Meio Ambiente e dos Recursos Naturais Renováveis
(Brazilian Institute of the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources, or IBAMA) routinely
inspects our oil platforms in the Campos Basin, and may impose fines, restrictions on operations or
other sanctions in connection with its inspections. In addition, we are subject to environmental
laws that require us to incur significant costs to cover damage that a project may cause to the
environment (environmental compensation). These additional costs may have a negative impact on the
profitability of the projects we intend to implement or may make such projects economically
unfeasible.
As environmental regulations become more stringent, it is probable that our capital
expenditures for compliance with environmental regulations and to effect improvements in our
health, safety and environmental practices will increase substantially in the future. Because our
capital expenditures are subject to approval by the Brazilian government, increased expenditures to
comply with environmental regulations could result in reductions in other strategic investments.
Any such reduction may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial
condition.
We may incur losses and spend time and money defending pending litigations and arbitrations.
We are currently a party to numerous legal proceedings relating to civil, administrative,
environmental, labor and tax claims filed against us. These claims involve substantial amounts of
money and other remedies. Several individual disputes account for a significant part of the total
amount of claims against us. For example, on the grounds that drilling and production platforms may
not be classified as sea-going vessels, the Brazilian Revenue Service asserted that overseas
remittances for charter payments should be reclassified as lease payment and subject to a
withholding tax of 25%. The Revenue Service has filed two tax assessments against us that in the
aggregate, on December 31, 2006, amounted to R$3,914 million (approximately U.S.$1,832 million).
See Item 8. Financial InformationLegal Proceedings.
We may also be subject to labor litigation in connection with recent changes in Brazilian
laws relating to retirement benefits affecting our employees.
In the event that claims involving a material amount and for which we have no provisions were
to be decided against us, or in the event that the losses estimated turn out to be significantly
higher than the provisions made, the aggregate cost of unfavorable decisions could have a material
adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. In addition, our management
may be required to direct its time and attention to defending these claims, which could preclude
them from focusing on our core business. Depending on the outcome, certain litigation could result
in restrictions on our operations and have a material adverse effect on certain of our businesses.
If the State of Rio de Janeiro enforces a law imposing the Domestic Value-Added Tax (ICMS) on
upstream oil activities, our results of operations and financial condition may be adversely
affected.
In June 2003, the State of Rio de Janeiro enacted a law, referred to as the Noel Law,
imposing ICMS on upstream activities. The constitutionality of the Noel Law is currently being
challenged in the Brazilian Supreme Court (Supremo Tribunal Federal, or STF) and although the law
was approved by the State Legislature, the
15
government of the State of Rio de Janeiro has not yet enforced it. Currently, the ICMS for
fuels derived from oil is assessed at the point of sale but not at the wellhead level. If the State
of Rio de Janeiro enforces the Noel Law, it is unlikely (depending on the grounds of the Supreme
Courts decision) that the other states would allow us to use the tax imposed at the wellhead level
in Rio de Janeiro as a credit to offset the tax imposed at the sale level. Therefore, we would have
to pay ICMS at both levels. We estimate that the amount of ICMS that we would be required to pay to
the State of Rio de Janeiro could increase by approximately R$9.4 billion (U.S.$4.3
billion) per year. This increase could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and financial condition.
Our participation in the domestic power market has generated losses and may not become profitable.
Consistent with the global trend of other major oil and gas companies and to secure demand for
our natural gas, we participate in the domestic power market. Despite a number of incentives
introduced by the Brazilian government to promote the development of gas-fired power plants,
development of such plants has been slow due to the market structure and regulation of the power
industry, among other things. We have invested, alone or with other investors, in fifteen (thirteen
in operation and two under construction or development) of the 21 existing gas-fired power
generation plants. Demand for energy produced by our gas-fired power plants has been lower than we
expected, as a consequence of the reduction in electricity demand due to a rationing that took
place in Brazil in 2001 and 2002. The resulting excess of electricity generation capacity in Brazil
has lowered the prices of energy and the majority of our thermoelectricity generation capacity is
not contracted in the short term. Although almost all of our long-term capacity has been sold
through the energy auctions promoted by the Brazilian government, we still face certain risks
associated with our gas-fired power business. The main risks are:
|
|
|
The potential mismatch between the contracted price indexation for energy to be sold
by gas-fired power companies and the cost of natural gas or other substitute fuel
supply; and |
|
|
|
|
The dependence on the construction of pipelines and other infrastructure to
transport and produce natural gas, and the commitment to purchase firm quantities of
natural gas to satisfy the requirement of the new regulatory model for power generation
in order to sell under long term energy contracts. |
As a result of the foregoing, our participation in the domestic power market has generated
losses and may not become profitable.
We may not be able to obtain financing for some of our planned investments, and failure to do so
could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
The Brazilian government maintains control over our budget and establishes limits on our
investments and long-term debt. As a state-controlled entity, we must submit our proposed annual
budgets to the Ministry of Planning, Budget and Management, the Ministry of Mines and Energy, and
the Brazilian Congress for approval. If we cannot obtain financing that does not require Brazilian
government approval, we may not be free to make all the investments we envision, including those we
have agreed to make to expand and develop our crude oil and natural gas fields. If we are unable to
make these investments, our operating results and financial condition may be adversely affected.
Currency fluctuations could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results
of operations, because most of our revenues are in reais and a large portion of our liabilities are
in foreign currencies.
The impacts of fluctuations in exchange rates, especially the real/U.S. dollar rate, on our
operations are varied and may be material. The principal market for our products is Brazil, as over
the last three fiscal years over 75% of our revenues have been denominated in reais, while some of
our operating expenses and capital expenditures and a substantial portion of our indebtedness are,
and are expected to continue to be, denominated in or indexed to U.S. dollars and other foreign
currencies. In addition, during 2006 we imported U.S.$10.7 billion of crude oil and oil products,
the prices of which were all denominated and paid in U.S. dollars. Conversely, a substantial share
of our liquid assets are held in U.S. dollar denominated assets, or indexed to the U.S. dollar, but
we do not use forwards, swaps and futures contracts to mitigate the impact of changes in currency
values on our operations and financial statements because of their limited liquidity and cost.
16
Our recent financial statements reflect the appreciation of the real by 18.2%, 8.1%, 11.8% and
8.7% against the U.S. dollar in 2003, 2004, 2005 and 2006, respectively, as a result of improvement
in macro-economic conditions and reduction in the markets perception of political risk in Brazil
and global emerging market risk. As of June 21, 2007, the exchange rate of the real to the U.S.
dollar was R$1.920 per U.S.$1.00, representing an appreciation of approximately 10.2% in 2007
year-to-date. Any reversal of this trend could affect negatively the results of our operations.
We are exposed to increases in prevailing market interest rates, which leaves us vulnerable to
increased financing expenses.
In spite of marked improvements in our credit ratings, which have facilitated our access to
fixed-interest long-term capital, a substantial portion of our total debt is represented by
structured finance, export credits, trade financing and other similar financing methods the funding
of which depends on floating rate instruments, and which for contractual, cost or other
considerations cannot be prepaid. As of December 31, 2006, approximately 59% U.S.$12,589 million
of our total indebtednessconsisted of floating rate debt. In light of cost considerations and
market analysis, we decided not to enter into derivative contracts or make other arrangements to
hedge against the risk of an increase in interest rates. Accordingly, if market interest rates
(principally LIBOR) rise, our financing expenses will increase, which could have an adverse effect
on our results of operations and financial condition.
We are not insured against business interruption for our Brazilian operations and most of our
assets are not insured against war or sabotage.
We do not maintain coverage for business interruptions of any nature for our Brazilian
operations, including business interruptions caused by labor action. If, for instance, our workers
were to strike, the resulting work stoppages could have an adverse effect on us. In addition, we do
not insure most of our assets against war or sabotage. Therefore, an attack or an operational
incident causing an interruption of our business could have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition or results of operations.
We are subject to substantial risks relating to our international operations, in particular in
Latin America and the Middle East.
We operate in a number of different countries, particularly in Latin America, West Africa and
the Middle East that can be politically, economically and socially unstable. The results of
operations and financial condition of our subsidiaries in these countries may be adversely affected
by fluctuations in their local economies, political instability and governmental actions relating
to the economy, including:
|
|
|
the imposition of exchange or price controls; |
|
|
|
|
the imposition of restrictions on hydrocarbon exports; |
|
|
|
|
the depreciation of local currencies; |
|
|
|
|
the nationalization of oil and gas reserves; |
|
|
|
|
increases in export tax / income tax rates for crude oil and oil products; or |
|
|
|
|
unilateral (governmental) institutional and contractual changes. |
If one or more of the risks described above were to materialize we may not achieve our
strategic objectives in these countries or in our international operations as a whole, which may
result in a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
Of the countries outside of Brazil in which we operate, Argentina is the most significant,
representing approximately 44% of our total international crude oil and natural gas production and
35% of our international proved crude oil and natural gas reserves at December 31, 2006. In
response to the Argentine peso crisis that began in 2001, the Argentine government has made a
number of changes in the regulatory structure of the electricity and
17
gas sectors and has established export tax rates for crude oil, natural gas and oil products.
We also have significant operations in Bolivia and Venezuela that represented, respectively,
approximately 23% and 11% of our total international production in barrels of oil equivalent and
24% and 9% of our international proved crude oil and natural gas reserves, respectively, at
December 31, 2006. Deterioration of the situation in Argentina, Bolivia or Venezuela may have an
adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition.
The nationalization measures taken by the Bolivian and Venezuelan governments may have an adverse
effect on our results of operations and financial condition. The Bolivian and Venezuelan
governments have recently increased their participation in their respective domestic oil and gas
industries, which may generate material losses to us.
We have been operating in Bolivia since 1996. Our consolidated interests related to Bolivia
include two refineries, oil and gas reserves, which represented approximately 1.9% of our total
reserves at December 31, 2006 and our interest in the Bolivia-Brazil gas pipeline (GTB). We also
hold a long-term gas supply agreement, or the GSA, for the purchase of natural gas from the
Bolivian state oil company, Yacimientos Petrolíferos Fiscales Bolivianos YPFB. As of December 31,
2006, the book value of Bolivia assets was U.S.$1,173 million. In 2006, the natural gas we
imported from Bolivia represented approximately 56% of our total natural gas sales. We supply this
natural gas to the Brazilian market, including local distribution companies and gas-fired power
plants in which we have an interest. On May 1, 2006, the Bolivian government announced that it
would nationalize several industries in the country, including the oil and gas industry. As a
result, companies engaged in oil and gas production activities in Bolivia were required to deliver
to YPFB all their oil and gas production. The nationalization measures also included a significant
increase in the government take (including royalties and direct taxes) for companies engaged in oil
and gas production in Bolivia from 18% of total production in 2005 to approximately 82% in 2006,
subject to production levels and the price of natural gas, among other variables to take into
account. We reviewed our production estimates for Bolivia and reduced our proved reserves in this
country from 2.7% of our total reserves in December 31, 2005 to 1.9% of our total reserves in
December 31, 2006. After negotiations with the Bolivian government, in May 2007, we reached a sales
agreement with YPFB, in which they have agreed to pay, in two installments, U.S.$112 millions for
all the outstanding shares of Petrobras Bolivia Refinación S.A., which owns the two refineries in
Bolivia. On June 11, 2007 we confirmed the first payment of U.S.$56 million from YPFB.
The Bolivian government attempted to increase the gas prices under the agreement but currently has
agreed to maintain the prices at the levels originally provided in the agreement, with the
exception of prices for gas with a calorific power higher than 8,900 kcal/m3, for which a new price
premium formula based on international market prices has yet to be negotiated.
Our interests in Venezuela include oil and gas reserves, which represented approximately 0.7%
of our total reserves at December 31, 2006. In April 2005, the Venezuelan Energy and Oil Ministry
instructed Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. (PDVSA), the Venezuelan government-controlled company
created to operate oil and gas reserves with private companies, to review thirty-two operating
agreements signed by PDVSA with oil companies from 1992 through 1997. In addition, PDVSA was
instructed to take measures in order to convert all effective operating agreements into
state-controlled companies in order to grant the Venezuelan government, through PDVSA, more than
50% ownership of each field, including agreements with our affiliates in connection with the areas
of Oritupano Leona, La Concepcion, Acema and Mata. As a result, as of December 31, 2005, we
recorded an impairment charge in order to adjust the book value of our Venezuelan assets in the
amount of U.S.$134 million. In March 31, 2006, we, PDVSA and Corporación Venezolana del Petróleo
S.A. (CVP), entered into memoranda of understanding (MOUs) in order to effect the migration of the
operating agreements to partially state-owned companies (mixed companies), whereby the interest
of PDVSA in each mixed company would be 60% and the interest of private companies like us would be
limited to 40%. In August 2006, the final migrating contracts were executed for Oritupano Leona,
Mata, Acema and La Concepción, with effective date of April 1, 2006.
All these measures generate significant uncertainty as to the status and prospects of our
investment and operations in Bolivia and Venezuela. We cannot estimate the degree to which these
nationalization measures will affect us, and believe they may have a material adverse effect on our
results of operations and financial condition. See Item 4. Information on the
Company¾International¾ Bolivian Activities and Item 4. Information on the
Company¾International¾ Venezuelan Activities.
18
Risks Relating to PifCo
PifCos operations and debt servicing capabilities are dependent on us.
PifCos financial position and results of operations are directly affected by our decisions.
PifCo is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of Petrobras incorporated in the Cayman Islands as an
exempted company with limited liability. PifCo has limited operations consisting principally of the
purchase of crude oil and oil products from third parties and the resale of those products to us or
to third parties. PifCo also buys crude oil and oil products from us, for sale to third parties and
affiliates on a limited basis. PifCos ability to service and repay its indebtedness is
consequently dependent on our own operations.
Financing for PifCos operations is provided by us as well as third-party credit providers in
favor of whom we provide credit support. This support to PifCos debt obligations is made through
standby purchase agreements whereby we agree to repurchase from the holders of PifCos notes their
right to receive payment from PifCo in case PifCo defaults payment.
Our own financial condition or results of operations, or our financial support of PifCo
directly affect PifCos operational results and debt servicing capabilities. For a more detailed
description of certain risks that may have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or
results of operations and therefore affect PifCos ability to meet its debt obligations see Risks
Relating to Our Operations.
PifCo depends on its ability to pass on its financing costs to us.
PifCo is principally engaged in the purchase of crude oil and oil products for sale to us, as
described above. PifCo regularly incurs indebtedness related to such purchases and/or in obtaining
financing from us or third-party creditors. All such indebtedness has the benefit of our standby
purchase obligation or other support, and PifCo has historically has passed on its financing costs
to us by selling crude oil and oil products to us at a premium to compensate for its financing
costs. If for any reason we are not permitted to continue these practices, this would have a
materially adverse effect on PifCos business and on its ability to meet its debt obligations in
the long term.
Risks Relating to the Relationship between us and the Brazilian Government
The Brazilian government, as our controlling shareholder, may cause us to pursue certain
macroeconomic and social objectives that may have an adverse effect on our results of operations
and financial condition.
The Brazilian government, as our controlling shareholder, has pursued, and may pursue in the
future, certain of its macroeconomic and social objectives through us. Brazilian law requires the
Brazilian government to own a majority of our voting stock, and so long as it does, the Brazilian
government will have the power to elect a majority of the members of our board of directors and,
through them, a majority of the executive officers who are responsible for our day-to-day
management. As a result, we may engage in activities that give preference to the objectives of the
Brazilian government rather than to our own economic and business objectives. In particular, we
continue to assist the Brazilian government to ensure that the supply of crude oil and oil products
in Brazil meets Brazilian consumption requirements. Accordingly, we may make investments, incur
costs and engage in sales on terms that may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and
financial condition.
If the Brazilian government reinstates controls over the prices we can charge for crude oil and oil
products, such price controls could affect our financial condition and results of operations.
In the past, the Brazilian government set prices for crude oil and oil products in Brazil,
occasionally below prices prevailing in the world oil markets. These prices involved elements of
cross-subsidy among different oil products sold in various regions in Brazil. The cumulative impact
of this price regulation system on us is recorded as an asset on our balance sheet under the line
item Petroleum and Alcohol AccountReceivable from the Brazilian government. The balance of the
account at December 31, 2006 was U.S.$ 368 million. All price controls for crude oil and
oil products ended on January 2, 2002, however, the Brazilian government could decide to reinstate
price controls in the future as a result of market instability or other conditions. If this were to
occur, our financial condition and results of operations could be adversely affected.
19
We do not own any of the crude oil and natural gas reserves in Brazil.
A guaranteed source of crude oil and natural gas reserves is essential to an oil and gas
companys sustained production and generation of income. Under Brazilian law, the Brazilian
government owns all crude oil and natural gas reserves in Brazil and the concessionaire owns the
oil and gas it produces. We possess the exclusive right to develop our reserves pursuant to
concession agreements awarded to us by the Brazilian government and we own the goods we produce
under the concession agreements, but if the Brazilian government were to restrict or prevent us
from exploiting these crude oil and natural gas reserves, our ability to generate income would be
adversely affected.
Risks Relating to Brazil
The Brazilian government has historically exercised, and continues to exercise, significant
influence over the Brazilian economy. Brazilian political and economic conditions have a direct
impact on our business and may have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and
financial condition.
The Brazilian governments economic policies may have important effects on Brazilian
companies, including us, and on market conditions and prices of Brazilian securities. Our financial
condition and results of operations may be adversely affected by the following factors and the
Brazilian governments response to these factors:
|
|
|
devaluations and other exchange rate movements; |
|
|
|
|
inflation; |
|
|
|
|
exchange control policies; |
|
|
|
|
social instability; |
|
|
|
|
price instability; |
|
|
|
|
energy shortages; |
|
|
|
|
interest rates; |
|
|
|
|
liquidity of domestic capital and lending markets; |
|
|
|
|
tax policy; and |
|
|
|
|
other political, diplomatic, social and economic developments in or affecting Brazil. |
Uncertainty over whether the Brazilian government will implement changes in policy or
regulations that may affect these or other factors in the future may lead to economic uncertainty
in Brazil and increase the volatility of the Brazilian securities market and securities issued
abroad by Brazilian companies.
Inflation and government measures to curb inflation may contribute significantly to economic
uncertainty in Brazil and to heightened volatility in the Brazilian securities markets and,
consequently, may adversely affect the market value of our securities and financial condition.
Our principal market is Brazil, which has, in the past, periodically experienced extremely
high rates of inflation. Inflation, along with governmental measures to combat inflation and public
speculation about possible future measures, has had significant negative effects on the Brazilian
economy. The annual rates of inflation, as measured by the National Consumer Price Index (Índice
Nacional de Preços ao Consumidor Amplo, or IPCA), have decreased from 2,477.15% in 1993 to 916.46%
in 1994 and to 5.97% in 2000. The same index increased to 9.30% in 2003, before decreasing to 3.14%
in 2006. Considering the historically high rates of inflation, Brazil may experience
higher levels of inflation in the future. The lower levels of inflation experienced since 1995
may not continue. Future governmental actions, including actions to adjust the value of the real,
could trigger increases in inflation, which may adversely affect our financial condition.
20
Access to international capital markets for Brazilian companies is influenced by the perception of
risk in Brazil and other emerging economies, which may hurt our ability to finance our operations
and the trading values of our securities.
International investors generally consider Brazil to be an emerging market. As a result,
economic and market conditions in other emerging market countries, especially those in Latin
America, influence the market for securities issued by Brazilian companies. As a result of economic
problems in various emerging market countries in recent years (such as the Asian financial crisis
of 1997, the Russian financial crisis in 1998 and the Argentine financial crisis that began in
2001), investors have viewed investments in emerging markets with heightened caution. These crises
produced a significant outflow of U.S. dollars from Brazil, causing Brazilian companies to face
higher costs for raising funds, both domestically and abroad, and impeding access to international
capital markets. Increased volatility in securities markets in Latin American and in other emerging
market countries may have a negative impact on the trading value of our securities. We cannot
assure you that international capital markets will remain open to Brazilian companies or that
prevailing interest rates in these markets will be advantageous to us.
Risks Relating to our Equity and Debt Securities
The size, volatility, liquidity and/or regulation of the Brazilian securities markets may curb your
ability to sell the common or preferred shares underlying our ADSs.
Petrobras shares are the most liquid in the São Paulo Stock Exchange (BOVESPA), but overall,
the Brazilian securities markets are smaller, more volatile and less liquid than the major
securities markets in the United States (and perhaps other jurisdictions), and may be regulated
differently from the way in which U.S. investors are accustomed. Factors that may specifically
affect the Brazilian equity markets may limit your ability to sell the common or preferred shares
underlying our ADSs at the price and time you desire.
The market for PifCos notes may not be liquid.
Some of PifCos notes are not listed on any securities exchange and are not quoted through an
automated quotation system. We can make no assurance as to the liquidity of or trading markets for
PifCos notes. We cannot guarantee that the holders of PifCos notes will be able to sell their
notes in the future. If a market for PifCos notes does not develop, holders of PifCos notes may
not be able to resell the notes for an extended period of time, if at all.
You may be unable to exercise preemptive rights with respect to the common or preferred shares
underlying the ADSs.
Holders of ADSs who are residents of the United States may not be able to exercise the
preemptive rights relating to the common or preferred shares underlying our ADSs unless a
registration statement under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933 is effective with respect to those
rights or an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available. We
are not obligated to file a registration statement with respect to the common or preferred shares
relating to these preemptive rights, and therefore we may not file any such registration statement.
If a registration statement is not filed and an exemption from registration does not exist,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as depositary, will attempt to sell the preemptive rights, and you will
be entitled to receive the proceeds of the sale. However, the preemptive rights will expire if the
depositary cannot sell them. For a more complete description of preemptive rights with respect to
the common or preferred shares, see Item 10. Additional InformationMemorandum and Articles of
Association of PetrobrasPreemptive Rights.
You may not be able to sell your ADSs at the time or the price you desire because an active or
liquid market for our ADSs may not be sustained.
Our preferred ADSs have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange since February 21, 2001,
while our common ADSs have been listed on the New York Stock Exchange since August 7, 2000. We
cannot predict whether an active liquid public trading market for our ADSs will be sustained on the
New York Stock Exchange, where they
21
are currently traded. Active, liquid trading markets generally
result in lower price volatility and more efficient execution of buy and sell orders for investors.
Liquidity of a securities market is often a function of the volume of the underlying shares that
are publicly held by unrelated parties. We do not anticipate that a public market for our common or
preferred shares will develop in the United States.
Restrictions on the movement of capital out of Brazil may impair your ability to receive dividends
and distributions on, and the proceeds of any sale of, the common or preferred shares underlying
the ADSs and may impact our ability to service certain debt obligations, including standby purchase
agreements we have entered into in support of PifCos notes.
The Brazilian government may impose temporary restrictions on the conversion of Brazilian
currency into foreign currencies and on the remittance to foreign investors of proceeds from their
investments in Brazil. Brazilian law permits the Brazilian government to impose these restrictions
whenever there is a serious imbalance in Brazils balance of payments or there are reasons to
foresee a serious imbalance.
The Brazilian government imposed remittance restrictions for approximately six months in 1990.
Similar restrictions, if imposed, could impair or prevent the conversion of dividends,
distributions, or the proceeds from any sale of common or preferred shares from reais into U.S.
dollars and the remittance of the U.S. dollars abroad. The Brazilian government could decide to
take similar measures in the future. In such a case, the depositary for the ADSs will hold the
reais it cannot convert for the account of the ADS holders who have not been paid. The depositary
will not invest the reais and will not be liable for the interest.
In addition, if the Brazilian government were to impose restrictions on our ability to convert
reais into U.S. dollars, we would not be able to make payment on our dollar-denominated debt
obligations. For example, any such restrictions could prevent us from making funds available to
PifCo, for payment of its debt obligations, certain of which are supported by us through standby
purchase agreements.
If you exchange your ADSs for common or preferred shares, you risk losing the ability to remit
foreign currency abroad and forfeiting Brazilian tax advantages.
The Brazilian custodian for our common or preferred shares underlying our ADSs must obtain a
certificate of registration from the Central Bank of Brazil to be entitled to remit U.S. dollars
abroad for payments of dividends and other distributions relating to our preferred and common
shares or upon the disposition of the common or preferred shares. If you decide to exchange your
ADSs for the underlying common or preferred shares, you will be entitled to continue to rely, for
five Brazilian business days from the date of exchange, on the custodians certificate of
registration. After that period, you may not be able to obtain and remit U.S. dollars abroad upon
the disposition of the common or preferred shares, or distributions relating to the common or
preferred shares, unless you obtain your own certificate of registration or register under
Resolution No. 2,689, of January 26, 2000, of the Conselho Monetário Nacional (National Monetary
Council), which entitles registered foreign investors to buy and sell on the São Paulo Stock
Exchange. In addition, if you do not obtain a certificate of registration or register under
Resolution No. 2,689, you may be subject to less favorable tax treatment on gains with respect to
the common or preferred shares.
If you attempt to obtain your own certificate of registration, you may incur expenses or
suffer delays in the application process, which could delay your ability to receive dividends or
distributions relating to the common or preferred shares or the return of your capital in a timely
manner. The custodians certificate of registration or any foreign capital registration obtained by
you may be affected by future legislative or regulatory changes and we cannot assure you that
additional restrictions applicable to you, the disposition of the underlying common or preferred
shares, or the repatriation of the proceeds from the process will not be imposed in the future.
22
You may face difficulties in protecting your interests as a shareholder because we are subject to
different corporate rules and regulations as a Brazilian company and because holders of our common
shares, preferred shares and ADSs have fewer and less well-defined shareholders rights than those
traditionally enjoyed by The United States shareholders.
Our corporate affairs are governed by our bylaws and the Brazilian Corporate Law, which differ
from the legal principles that would apply if we were incorporated in a jurisdiction in the United
States, such as the States of Delaware or New York, or in other jurisdictions outside Brazil. In
addition, your rights as an ADS holder, which are derivative of the rights of holders of our common
or preferred shares, as the case may be, to protect your interests against actions by our board of
directors may be fewer and less well-defined under Brazilian Corporate Law than those under the
laws of other jurisdictions.
Although insider trading and price manipulation are considered crimes under Brazilian law, the
Brazilian securities markets are not as highly regulated and supervised as the U.S. securities
markets or markets in some other jurisdictions. In addition, rules and policies against
self-dealing and the preservation of shareholder interests may be less well-defined and enforced in
Brazil than in the United States, putting holders of our common shares, preferred shares and ADSs
at a potential disadvantage. Corporate disclosure may be less complete or informative than what may
be expected of a U.S. public company.
We are a state-controlled company organized under the laws of Brazil and all of our directors
and officers reside in Brazil. Substantially all of our assets and those of our directors and
officers are located in Brazil. As a result, it may not be possible for you to effect service of
process upon us or our directors and officers within the United States or other jurisdictions
outside Brazil or to enforce against us or our directors and officers judgments obtained in the
United States or other jurisdictions outside Brazil. Because judgments of U.S. courts for civil
liabilities based upon the U.S. federal securities laws may only be enforced in Brazil if certain
requirements are met, you may face greater difficulties in protecting your interest in actions
against us or our directors and officers than would shareholders of a corporation incorporated in a
state or other jurisdiction of the United States.
Preferred shares and the ADSs representing preferred shares generally do not give you voting
rights.
A portion of our ADSs represent our preferred shares. Under Brazilian law and our bylaws,
holders of preferred shares generally do not have the right to vote in meetings of our
stockholders. This means, among other things, that holders of ADSs representing preferred shares
are not entitled to vote on important corporate transactions or decisions. See Item 10. Additional
InformationMemorandum and Articles of Incorporation of PetrobrasVoting Rights for a discussion
of the limited voting rights of our preferred shares.
Enforcement of our obligations under the standby purchase agreement might take longer than
expected.
We have entered into a standby purchase agreement in support of PifCos obligations under its
notes and indentures. Our obligation to purchase from the PifCo noteholders any unpaid amounts of
principal, interest and other amounts due under the PifCo notes and the indenture applies, subject
to certain limitations, irrespective of whether any such amounts are due at the maturity of the
PifCo notes or otherwise. See Additional InformationPifCo Senior NotesStandby Purchase
Agreements and Additional InformationPifCo Global NotesStandby Purchase Agreements.
We have been advised by our counsel that the enforcement of the standby purchase agreement in
Brazil against us, if necessary, will occur under a form of judicial process that, while similar,
has certain procedural differences from those applicable to enforcement of a guarantee and, as a
result, the enforcement of the standby purchase agreement may take longer than would otherwise be
the case with a guarantee.
If Brazilian law restricts us from paying PifCo in U.S. dollars, PifCo may have insufficient U.S.
dollar funds to make payments on its debt obligations and we may not be able to pay our obligations
under the standby purchase agreement in U.S. Dollars.
Currently, payments by us to PifCo for the import of oil, the expected source of PifCos cash
resources to pay its obligations under the PifCo notes, will not require approval by or
registration with the Central Bank of
23
Brazil. There may be other regulatory requirements that we will need to comply with in order
to make funds available to PifCo. Nonetheless, Central Bank of Brazil may impose prior approval
requirements on the remittance of U.S. dollars abroad. If Brazilian law were to impose
restrictions, limitations or prohibitions on our ability to convert reais into U.S. dollars, PifCo
may not have sufficient U.S. dollar funds available to make payment on its debt obligations.
In the case that the PifCo noteholders receive payments in reais corresponding to the
equivalent U.S. Dollar amounts due under PifCos notes, it may not be possible to convert these
amounts into U.S. Dollars. We will not need any prior or subsequent approval from the Central Bank
of Brazil to use funds we hold abroad to comply with our obligations under the standby purchase
agreement.
We would be required to pay judgments of Brazilian courts enforcing our obligations under the
standby purchase agreement only in reais
If proceedings were brought in Brazil seeking to enforce our obligations in respect of the
standby purchase agreement, we would be required to discharge our obligations only in reais. Under
the Brazilian exchange control limitations, an obligation to pay amounts denominated in a currency
other than reais, which is payable in Brazil pursuant to a decision of a Brazilian court, may be
satisfied in reais at the rate of exchange, as determined by the Central Bank of Brazil, in effect
on the date of payment.
A finding that we are subject to U.S. bankruptcy laws and that the standby purchase agreement
executed by us was a fraudulent conveyance could result in PifCo noteholders losing their legal
claim against us.
PifCos obligation to make payments on the PifCo notes is supported by our obligation under
the standby purchase agreement to make payments on PifCos behalf. We have been advised by our
external U.S. counsel that the standby purchase agreement is valid and enforceable in accordance
with the laws of the State of New York and the United States. In addition, we have been advised by
our general counsel that the laws of Brazil do not prevent the standby purchase agreement from
being valid, binding and enforceable against us in accordance with its terms. In the event that
U.S. federal fraudulent conveyance or similar laws are applied to the standby purchase agreement,
and we, at the time we entered into the standby purchase agreement:
|
|
|
were or are insolvent or rendered insolvent by reason of our entry into the standby
purchase agreement; |
|
|
|
|
were or are engaged in business or transactions for which the assets remaining with
us constituted unreasonably small capital; or |
|
|
|
|
intended to incur or incurred, or believed or believe that we would incur, debts
beyond our ability to pay such debts as they mature; and |
|
|
|
|
in each case, intended to receive or received less than reasonably equivalent value
or fair consideration therefor, |
then our obligations under the standby purchase agreement could be avoided, or claims with respect
to the standby purchase agreement could be subordinated to the claims of other creditors. Among
other things, a legal challenge to the standby purchase agreement on fraudulent conveyance grounds
may focus on the benefits, if any, realized by us as a result of PifCos issuance of these notes.
To the extent that the standby purchase agreement is held to be a fraudulent conveyance or
unenforceable for any other reason, the holders of the PifCo notes would not have a claim against
us under the standby purchase agreement and will solely have a claim against PifCo. We cannot
assure you that, after providing for all prior claims, there will be sufficient assets to satisfy
the claims of the PifCo noteholders relating to any avoided portion of the standby purchase
agreement.
ITEM 4. INFORMATION ON THE COMPANY
History and Development of Petrobras
We are a state-controlled company created pursuant to Law No. 2,004 (effective as of October
3, 1953). A state-controlled company is a Brazilian corporation created by special law, of which a
majority of the voting capital
24
must be owned by the Brazilian federal government, a state or a
municipality. We are controlled by the Brazilian federal government, but our common and preferred
shares are also publicly traded. Our principal executive office is located at Avenida República do
Chile, 65, 20031-912 Rio de Janeiro RJ, Brazil and our telephone number is (55-21) 3224-4477.
We were incorporated in 1953 and began operations in Brazil in 1954 as a wholly-owned
governmental enterprise responsible for implementing the governments hydrocarbon activities in
Brazil. Since our foundation, our legal name has been Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.PETROBRAS. From
that time until 1995, we carried out all crude oil and natural gas production and refining
activities in Brazil in the name of the government. On November 9, 1995, the Brazilian Constitution
was amended to authorize the Brazilian government to contract with any state or privately owned
company to carry out the activities related to the upstream and downstream segments of the
Brazilian oil and gas sector. This amendment made possible the deregulation of the sector in 1988.
The crude oil and natural gas industry in Brazil has experienced significant reforms since the
enactment of Law No. 9,478, or the Oil Law, on August 6, 1997, which established competition in
Brazilian markets for crude oil, oil products and natural gas. Effective January 2, 2002, the
Brazilian government deregulated prices for crude oil and oil products. See Regulation of the Oil
and Gas Industry in BrazilPrice Regulation. The gradual transformation of the oil and gas
industry since 1997 has led to increased participation by international companies in Brazil across
all segments of our business, both as our competitors and as our partners.
Based upon our 2006 consolidated revenues, we are the largest corporation in Brazil and one of
the largest oil and gas companies in Latin America. In 2006, we had sales of products and services
of U.S.$93,893 million, net operating revenues of U.S.$72,347 million and net income of U.S.$12,826
million.
We engage in a broad range of oil and gas activities, which cover the following segments of
our operations:
|
|
|
Exploration and Production Our exploration and production segment encompasses
exploration, development and production activities in Brazil. |
|
|
|
|
Supply Our supply segment encompasses refining, logistics, transportation,
exportation and the purchase of crude oil, as well as the purchase and sale of oil
products and fuel alcohol. In addition, this segment includes the petrochemical and
fertilizers division, which includes investments in domestic petrochemical companies
and our two domestic fertilizer plants. |
|
|
|
|
Distribution Our distribution segment represents the oil product and fuel alcohol
distribution activities conducted by our wholly owned subsidiary, Petrobras
Distribuidora S.A. BR in Brazil. |
|
|
|
|
Gas and Power Our gas and power segment encompasses the purchase, sale,
transportation and distribution of natural gas produced in or imported into Brazil. In
addition, this segment includes our participation in domestic electricity production,
including investments in domestic natural gas transportation companies, state owned
natural gas distributors and gas-fired power companies. |
|
|
|
|
International Our international segment encompasses Exploration and Production,
Supply, Distribution and Gas and Power activities conducted in the following countries:
Argentina, Angola, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Equatorial Guinea, Iran, Libya, Mexico,
Mozambique, Nigeria, Paraguay, Peru, the United States, Tanzania, Turkey, Uruguay and
Venezuela. |
|
|
|
|
Corporate Our corporate segment includes the financial results and those
activities not attributable to other segments, including corporate financial
management, overhead related to central administration
and other expenses, which include actuarial expenses related to our pension and health
care plans for non-active participants. |
As a foreign private issuer, we are exempt from many of the corporate governance standards the
New York Stock Exchange, or NYSE, applies to U.S. domestic issuers listed on the NYSE. In
accordance with Section 303A.11 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual, we have posted a summary of
significant differences between the NYSE standards and our corporate governance practice on our
website, www.petrobras.com.br.
25
Competitive Strengths
Dominant market position in the production, refining and transportation of crude oil, natural gas
and oil products in Brazil
Our legacy as Brazils former sole supplier of crude oil and oil products has provided us with
a fully developed operational infrastructure throughout Brazil and a large proved reserve base. Our
long history, resources and established presence in Brazil permit us to compete effectively with
other market participants and new entrants now that the Brazilian oil and gas industry has been
deregulated. We operate most of the development fields in Brazil and substantially all of the
countrys refining capacity. Our average domestic daily production of crude oil and NGLs increased
5.6% in 2006, increased 12.8% in 2005, and decreased 3.1% in 2004.
Strong reserve base
As of December 31, 2006, we had estimated proved developed and undeveloped crude oil and
natural gas reserves of approximately 11.458 billion barrels of oil equivalent in Brazil and
abroad, including proportional reserves related to unconsolidated companies in Venezuela in the
volume of 78.6 million barrels of oil equivalent. In addition, we have a substantial base of
exploration acreage both in Brazil and abroad, which we are exploring by ourselves and with
industry partners in order to continue to increase our reserves.
As of December 31, 2006, our worldwide proved reserves to production ratio was 14.5 years.
The majority of our reserves, including recent discoveries, are located in deepwater areas
that generally require additional planning, more comprehensive evaluation and added lead time to
begin production when compared to onshore production. In accordance with our Business Plan for the
period from 2007 to 2011, we have been investing the necessary capital to build the offshore
platforms needed to derive income from these reserves. Although our proved reserve life is higher
than the industry average, the additional planning required to bring deepwater areas into
production also means that our percentage of proved undeveloped reserves may be higher than the
industry average.
We believe that our proved reserves will provide us with significant opportunities for
sustaining and increasing production growth.
Upstream and downstream technological expertise and international recognition for production and
exploration in deep and ultra-deep waters
While developing Brazils offshore basins over the past 37 years, we have gained expertise in
deepwater drilling, development and production techniques and technologies. We are currently in the
process of developing technology to permit production from wells at water depths of up to 9,843
feet (3,000 meters).
Our deepwater development and production expertise has allowed us to achieve high production
volumes and relatively low lifting costs (excluding royalties, special government participation and
rental of areas, which we refer to as government take). Our aggregate average lifting cost for
crude oil and natural gas products in Brazil for 2006, excluding government take, increased to
U.S.$ 6.59 per barrel of oil equivalent, as compared to U.S.$5.73 per barrel of oil
equivalent for 2005. Government take, increased to U.S.$ 11.05 per barrel of oil
equivalent for 2006, as compared to U.S.$9.00 per barrel of oil equivalent for 2005. The
international price of oil is one of the factors in determining the government take.
Cost efficiencies created by large-scale operations combined with vertical integration among
business
As the dominant integrated crude oil and natural gas company in Brazil, we can be cost
efficient as a result of:
|
|
|
the location of over 81% of our proved reserves in large, contiguous and highly
productive fields in the offshore Campos Basin, which allows for the concentration of
our operational infrastructure, thereby reducing our total costs of exploration,
development and production; |
26
|
|
|
the location of most of our refining capacity in the Southeast region, directly
adjacent to the Campos Basin and situated within the countrys most heavily populated
and industrialized markets; and |
|
|
|
|
the relative balance between our domestic production of 1,778 Mbpd, our refining
throughput of 1,746 Mbpd and our sales to the Brazilian market for hydrocarbon products
of 1,697 Mbpd. |
We believe that these cost efficiencies created by our integration, our existing
infrastructure and our balance allow us to compete effectively with other Brazilian producers and
importers of oil products into the Brazilian market.
Strong position in Brazils growing natural gas markets
We participate in most aspects of the Brazilian natural gas market, but our ability to meet
potential demand has been limited by constraints in supply, transportation and distribution
infrastructure, which is still under development. The output from gas-fired power plants was lower
than in 2005, and as a consequence, the demand for natural gas in Brazil increased only 2.5% in
2006, despite the 9.8% growth in the non-thermoelectric market (mainly in the industrial and
vehicular segments) as compared to 11% in 2005. Nonetheless, we still expect a significant growth
due to new gas transportation pipelines that will start operations.
Because of the diversity of our natural gas operations, we believe that we are well positioned
to take advantage of the opportunity to meet potentially growing energy needs in Brazil through the
use of natural gas. We intend to do so through:
|
|
|
increasing the internal production of both associated and non-associated gas, mainly
offshore in the Espírito Santo, Campos and Santos Basins; |
|
|
|
|
expanding of the natural gas transportation network throughout Brazil; |
|
|
|
|
prioritizing the acceleration of investment projects in anticipation of the natural
gas supply in the southeast region of Brazil; |
|
|
|
|
increasing participation in the natural gas distribution market through investments
in 19 of the 25 natural gas distribution companies in Brazil; |
|
|
|
|
investments in gas-fired power plants, which serve as sources of demand for our
natural gas; and |
|
|
|
|
seeking greater operational flexibility in our sources, including two LNG projects
in the northeastern and southeastern regions, to improve our energy demand management. |
Success in attracting international partners in all our activities
As a result of our experience, expertise and extensive infrastructure network in Brazil, we
have attracted partners in our exploration, development, refining and power activities such as
Repsol-YPF, ExxonMobil, Shell, Chevron, Statoil and Total. Partnering with other companies allows
us to share risks, capital commitments and technology in our continuing development and expansion.
We may face significant risks in our ability to take full advantage of these competitive
strengths. See Item 3. Key InformationRisk Factors.
Strategy
We intend to continue to expand our oil and gas exploration and production activities and
pursue strategic investments within and outside of Brazil to further develop our business. We seek
to evolve from a dominant integrated oil and gas company in Brazil into an energy industry leader
in Latin America and a significant international energy company. In line with our Strategic Plan
and to further these goals, we intend to:
27
Consolidate and increase competitive advantages in the Brazilian and South American oil and
oil products market
Our 2007-2011 Business Plan contemplates capital expenditures of approximately U.S.$40.7
billion in exploration and development activities in Brazil. Through these investments, we plan to
implement 15 large-scope projects, among others, aimed at increasing production to 2.374 million
bpd by 2011. Our 2007-2011 Business Plan contemplates capital expenditures of approximately
U.S.$8.5 billion in exploration and development activities outside of Brazil. These investments
will be primarily exploration and development activities in South America. At December 2006, we had
exploration, development and production rights in 89.87 million gross and 46.84 million net acres
(363,700 gross and 189,500 net square kilometers) outside Brazil.
At the same time that we seek to expand production, we intend to increase proved reserves,
focused on deepwater exploration in Brazil. We have net exploration, development and production
rights in 33.8 million acres (136,772 square kilometers) in Brazil. We expect to continue to
participate selectively with major regional and international oil and gas companies in bidding for
new concessions and in developing large offshore fields.
Our domestic production in 2006 supplied approximately 80% of the crude oil feedstock for our
refinery operations in Brazil, the same level as in 2005 and 76% in 2004. We expect an increasing
percentage of the crude oil feedstock to be supplied by our domestic production, as investments in
our refineries permit. Our refineries were originally designed to process light imported crude
oil, whereas our current reserves and production increasingly consist of heavier crude oil. We are
in the process of improving and adapting our refineries in order to better process our domestic
production of heavier crude oil. Because our domestic refining capacity constitutes 98.4% of the
Brazilian refining capacity, we supply almost all of the refined product needs of third-party
wholesalers, exporters and petrochemical companies, in addition to satisfying our internal
consumption requirements with respect to wholesale marketing operations and petrochemical
feedstock.
Selectively expand international activities in an integrated manner with our business
In the short term, we expect to expand internationally by using our existing asset base or
participating in selective partnerships in core activities where we have a competitive advantage.
We consider our core activities to be integrated oil and gas operations throughout South America
and deepwater exploration and development off the U.S. Gulf Coast, Colombia and West Africa. We
also have exploration interests in Angola, Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Mozambique,
Nigeria, Equatorial Guinea, Iran, the Gulf of Mexico, Tanzania, Turkey and Libya.
Develop and lead the domestic natural gas market and act in an integrated manner in the gas and
power market in South America
Through our participation in all segments of the natural gas market, both in Brazil and
abroad, we seek to meet domestic natural gas demand. We intend to continue to expand our
participation in the natural gas market by:
|
|
|
developing the natural gas industry in an integrated manner with other areas of the
Company in the production and consumption chain; and |
|
|
|
|
taking advantage of opportunities in the power industry in an integrated manner with
other natural gas market areas in which our Company already operates. |
As a result of our investments and the growing importance of natural gas as a cleaner energy
alternative, we anticipate that the proportion of revenues and assets represented by natural gas
operations will increase, leading to a greater impact of these activities on our results of
operations.
Selectively expand our activities in the petrochemicals market
We intend to expand activities in the petrochemical and fertilizer markets by seeking
strategic partnerships and creating synergies with our existing business. Our 2007-2011 Business
Plan contemplates investments of approximately U.S.$3.2 billion in petrochemical business. Such
investment will be aimed at increasing production of our basic petrochemicals, including
polyolefins (polyethylene and polypropylene), acrylic acid and terephtalic
28
acid. We believe that
the growth of petrochemical activities will generate synergies with refining activities and we
intend to benefit from the expected growth in the petrochemical market in Brazil.
Selectively perform in the renewable energy market
We intend to develop renewable energy alternatives in Brazil. Our priorities for investments
in renewable sources of energy are:
|
|
|
The diesel from the HBIO process. The HBIO technology has been developed by the
Petrobras research and development facility as one of the projects of the Petrobras
refining technology program. This process involves a catalytic hydroconversion of
mixtures of diesel fractions and vegetable oil in an HDT reactor under controlled
conditions of high temperature and hydrogen pressure. The triglycerides from vegetable
oil are transformed into linear hydrocarbon chains, similar to those that already exist
in the diesel coming from petroleum but, without residue generation and with a small
propane production; and |
|
|
|
|
biomass energy. |
Overview by Business Segment
Exploration, Development and Production
Summary and Strategy
Our exploration and production segment includes exploration, development and production
activities in Brazil and abroad. We began domestic production in 1954 and international production
in 1972. As of December 31, 2006, our estimated net proved crude oil and natural gas reserves in
Brazil were approximately 10.573 billion barrels of oil equivalent. Crude oil represented 85% and
natural gas represented 15% of these reserves. Our proved reserves are located principally in the
Campos Basin.
During 2006, our average daily domestic production was 1,778 Mbpd of crude oil and NGLs and
1.660 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day. Our aggregate average lifting costs for crude oil
and natural gas in 2006 were U.S.$6.59 per barrel of oil equivalent in Brazil (excluding government
take).
We conduct exploration, development and production activities in Brazil through concession
contracts. Under the terms of the Oil Law, in 1998 we were granted the concession rights to areas
where we were already producing or could demonstrate we could explore or develop within a certain
time frame. We refer to these concessions as Round Zero. In a number of concessions, we have joint
ventures with foreign partners to explore and develop the concessions. In conjunction with the
majority of these arrangements, we received a carried interest for capital expenditures made during
the exploration phase, with our partners incurring all capital expenditures until the development
of a commercial discovery commences. Since then, we have participated in all the bid rounds for new
concession areas in Brazil conducted by the Agência Nacional de Petróleo (the National Petroleum
Agency, or the ANP).
At December 31, 2006, we held 459 areas, representing 33,796 thousand net acres (136,772
square kilometers). We currently have joint venture agreements for exploration and production in
Brazil with 25 foreign and domestic companies. We are also active in exploration and production
activities outside Brazil. For a full description of our international activities, see
InternationalExploration and Production.
Our main strategies in exploration, development and production in Brazil are to increase
production and reserves by:
|
|
|
Strengthen our position in deep and ultra-deepwater drilling and operating; |
|
|
|
|
Operate both onshore and in shallow waters, focusing on profitable opportunities; |
|
|
|
|
Implement new practices and technologies in order to increase reserve recovery; |
29
|
|
|
Increase exploration and development efforts in new territories to maintain a
sustainable reserves to production ratio; |
|
|
|
|
Assure long-term Brazilian self-sufficiency in oil, with production reaching
approximately 20% above domestic consumption by 2015; |
|
|
|
|
Optimize the development of our existing proved reserves, especially by expanding
light oil production; and |
|
|
|
|
Accelerate the production and supply of natural gas. |
Principal Domestic Oil and Gas Producing Regions
Our annual daily production in Brazil has consistently grown over the years. In 1970, we
produced 164 Mbpd of crude oil, condensate and natural gas liquids in Brazil. We increased
production to 181 Mbpd in 1980, 654 Mbpd in 1990, 1,271 Mbpd in 2000 and 1,778 Mbpd in 2006. In
describing our oil and gas producing regions, reservoirs refer to underground formations containing
producible oil or gas. Fields are areas that contain one or more reservoirs. Blocks are sections of
a sedimentary basin where we carry out oil and gas exploration and production activities under
concession contracts.
Our main domestic oil and gas producing regions are:
Campos Basin
The Campos Basin is the largest oil and gas producing region, and covers approximately 28.4
million acres (115 thousand square kilometers). Since exploration activities in this area began in
1968, over 60 hydrocarbon accumulations have been discovered in this region, including eight large
oil fields in deepwater and ultra deepwater. We currently have exploration rights to 32 blocks in
this Basin, which are grouped into 13 block contracts, with an exploration acreage of 11.1 thousand
square kilometers. In terms of proved hydrocarbon reserves and annual production, the Campos Basin
is the largest oil basin in Brazil and one of the most prolific oil and gas areas in South America.
The annual crude oil production volume in the region increased steadily for the past ten years
until 2004, when oil production in the Campos Basin decreased to 1,204 Mbpd from 1,252 Mbpd in
2003. In 2005, oil production in the Campos Basin increased to 1,405 Mbpd and in 2006, increased to
1,468 Mbpd. The Campos Basins oil production accounted for approximately 83% of Brazilian oil
production in 2006.
At December 31, 2006, we produced crude oil from 36 fields in the Campos Basin and its proved
crude oil reserves were 7.85 billion barrels, representing 87.3% of our total proved crude oil
reserves. In 2006, the crude oil we produced in the Campos Basin had an average API gravity of 23.2
and an average water cut of 1%. We currently have 29 floating production systems, 14 fixed
platforms and 4,969 kilometers of pipeline and flexible pipes operating in 36 fields at water
depths from 262 to 6,188 feet (80 to 1,886 meters) in the Campos Basin.
Espírito Santo Basin
We have made several discoveries of light oil and natural gas in the Espírito Santo Basin. We
currently have exploration rights to 48 blocks in this Basin, which are grouped into 23 block
contracts, 13 onshore and 10 offshore, with an exploration acreage of 9.9 thousand square
kilometers. During 2006, we produced 77.3 Mboe per day of oil and natural gas in the Espírito Santo
Basin (19.7 Mboe onshore and 57.6 Mboe offshore). On February 21, 2006, we began gas production in
the Peroá Field.
Santos Basin
The Santos Basin represents one of the most promising exploration areas. In January of 2006,
we approved the Master Plan for Development of Natural Gas and Oil Production in the Santos Basin,
with a base of exploration and production in the city of Santos, in the state of São Paulo. We
currently have exploration rights to 55 blocks in the Santos Basin, which are grouped into 32 block
contracts, with an exploration acreage of 41.2 thousand square kilometers. Current production of
oil and natural gas is 9.24 Mboe per day in the Coral and Merluza fields.
30
Properties
The following table sets forth our developed and undeveloped gross and net acreage by oil
region and associated crude oil and natural gas production:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil and |
|
Oil and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas |
|
Natural Gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
Production |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for the |
|
for the Year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
Ended |
|
|
Production Acreage as of |
|
December |
|
December |
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
31, |
|
31, |
|
|
Developed |
|
Undeveloped |
|
2006(1)(4) |
|
2005(1)(4) |
|
|
Gross(2) |
|
Net(2) |
|
Gross(2) |
|
Net(2) |
|
|
|
|
(in acres) |
|
(boe per day) (3) |
Brazil(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campos Basin |
|
|
1,706,226 |
|
|
|
1,587,370 |
|
|
|
399,808 |
|
|
|
388,441 |
|
|
|
1,594,820 |
|
|
|
1,530,147 |
|
Other offshore |
|
|
310,358 |
|
|
|
280,459 |
|
|
|
690,892 |
|
|
|
665,193 |
|
|
|
120,147 |
|
|
|
64,510 |
|
Total offshore |
|
|
2,016,583 |
|
|
|
1,867,829 |
|
|
|
1,090,700 |
|
|
|
1,053,634 |
|
|
|
1,714,967 |
|
|
|
1,594,657 |
|
Onshore |
|
|
1,019,781 |
|
|
|
1,019,782 |
|
|
|
138,129 |
|
|
|
138,129 |
|
|
|
339,327 |
|
|
|
363,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Brazil |
|
|
3,036,364 |
|
|
|
2,887,611 |
|
|
|
1,228,829 |
|
|
|
1,191,763 |
|
|
|
2,054,294 |
|
|
|
1,957,860 |
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onshore |
|
|
3,634,675 |
|
|
|
2,334,637 |
|
|
|
2,306,486 |
|
|
|
1,507,738 |
|
|
|
233,915 |
|
|
|
245,828 |
|
Offshore |
|
|
113,457 |
|
|
|
31,893 |
|
|
|
332,816 |
|
|
|
68,185 |
|
|
|
9,377 |
|
|
|
12,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total International |
|
|
3,748,132 |
|
|
|
2,366,530 |
|
|
|
2,639,302 |
|
|
|
1,575,923 |
|
|
|
243,292 |
|
|
|
258,737 |
|
Total |
|
|
6,784,496 |
|
|
|
5,254,141 |
|
|
|
3,868,131 |
|
|
|
2,767,686 |
|
|
|
2,297,586 |
|
|
|
2,216,597 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Over 77% of our production of natural gas was associated gas in 2006 and 2005. |
|
(2) |
|
A gross acre is an acre in which a working interest is owned. The number of gross acres is
the total number of acres in which a working interest is owned. A net acre is deemed to exist
when the sum of fractional ownership working interests in gross acres equals one. The number
of net acres is the sum of the fractional working interests owned in gross acres expressed as
whole numbers and fractions thereof. |
|
(3) |
|
See Conversion Table for the ratios used to convert cubic feet of natural gas to barrels of
oil equivalent. |
|
(4) |
|
Includes production from shale oil reserves, natural gas liquids and reinjected gas volumes,
which are not included in our proved reserves figures. |
The following table sets forth our total gross and net productive wells as of December
31, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Productive Wells |
|
|
Oil |
|
Gas |
|
Total |
Gross productive wells |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
9,058 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
9,542 |
|
International |
|
|
5,873 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
6,227 |
|
Total |
|
|
14,931 |
|
|
|
838 |
|
|
|
15,769 |
|
Net productive wells |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
9,046 |
|
|
|
484 |
|
|
|
9,530 |
|
International |
|
|
4,237 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
4,473 |
|
Total |
|
|
13,283 |
|
|
|
720 |
|
|
|
14,003 |
|
Productive wells are those producing or capable of production. A gross well is one in which a
working interest is owned. The number of gross wells is the total number of wells in which a
working interest is owned. A net well is deemed to exist when the sum of fractional ownership
working interests in gross wells equals one. The number of net wells is the sum of the fractional
working interests owned in gross wells expressed as whole numbers and fractions thereof.
31
Deepwater Expertise
We are the leading company in deepwater drilling, with recognized expertise in deepwater
exploration, development and production. We have developed expertise over many years and have
achieved significant milestones, including the following:
|
|
|
in January 2003, we drilled the worlds second horizontal deepwater multilateral
well in the Barracuda-Caratinga field, in Campos Basin, at an water depth of 2,999 feet
(914 meters), consisting of two legs for each well; |
|
|
|
|
on December 31, 2006, we were operating 62 wells at water depths in excess of 3,281
feet (1,000 meters); and |
|
|
|
|
by December 31, 2006, we had drilled 565 wells at water depths in excess of 3,281
feet (1,000 meters), the deepest well being an exploration well in a water depth of
9,360 feet (2,853 meters). |
Because many of Brazils richest oil fields are located offshore in deep waters, we intend to
continue to focus on deepwater production technology to increase our proved reserves and future
domestic production. See Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsResearch and
Development. Our main exploration and development efforts focus on offshore fields neighboring
existing fields and production infrastructure, where higher drilling costs have been offset by
higher drilling success ratios and relatively higher production. On a per-well basis, the
exploration, development and production costs offshore are generally higher than those onshore. We
believe, however, that offshore production is cost-effective, because historically:
|
|
|
we have been more successful in finding and developing crude oil offshore, as a
result of the existence of a larger number and size of oil reservoirs offshore as
compared to onshore reservoirs and a greater volume of offshore seismic data collected;
and |
|
|
|
|
we have been able to spread the total costs of exploration, development and
production over a large base, given the size and productivity of our offshore reserves.
Offshore production has exceeded onshore production by a per barrel production ratio of
6.94:1 in 2006, 5.92:1 in 2005 and 4.96:1 in 2004. |
We currently extract hydrocarbons from offshore wells in waters with depths of up to 6,188
feet (1,886 meters), and we have been developing technology to permit production from wells at
water depths of up to 9,843 feet (3,000 meters). Set forth below is the distribution, by water
depth, of offshore oil production in 2006 and 2005.
OFFSHORE PRODUCTION BY WATER DEPTH
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depth |
|
Percentage in 2006 |
|
Percentage in 2005 |
0-400 meters (0-1,312 feet) |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
400-1,000 meters (1,312 feet-3,281 feet) |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
56 |
% |
More than 1,000 meters (3,281 feet) |
|
|
31 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
Exploration Activities
Concessions in Brazil
We acquired the right to exploit all exploration, development and production areas in Brazil
as a result of the monopoly granted to us by Brazilian Law. When regulatory changes in the
Brazilian oil and gas sector began in 1998, our monopoly ended. On August 6, 1998, we signed
concession contracts with the ANP for all of the areas we had been using prior to 1998. Those
concession contracts covered 397 areas, consisting of 231 production areas, 115 exploration areas
and 51 development areas, for a total aggregate area of 113.3 million gross acres (458.5 thousand
square kilometers).
32
As of December 31, 2006, we had 459 areas, consisting of 247 production areas, 154 exploration
areas and 58 development areas, for a total aggregate area of 42.0 million gross acres (170.1
thousand square kilometers). This total area represents 2.7% of the Brazilian sedimentary basins.
Recent discoveries
The exploration highlight of the year was the light oil and natural gas discovery made in the
pre-salt section in the ultra-deep waters of the Santos Basin.
In 2006, we declared the commercial feasibility of 27 new oil and gas accumulations18
offshore and 9 onshore. Some of these areas were classified as new oil and natural gas fields;
others were incorporated to adjacent oil and gas fields. Of the 27 areas, 18 are located offshore
in the Campos (10), Santos (4) and Espírito Santo (4) basins; and 9 are located in the onshore
coastal basins of Potiguar (4), Reconcavo (1) and Espírito Santo (3), and in the Paleozoic Solimões
basin (1).
In the Santos Basin, 3 areas operated exclusively by Petrobras were declared commercial and
transformed into the oil and natural gas fields of Tambuatá, Pirapitanga and Carapiá. Another area
was incorporated into the Mexilhão gas field ring-fence. We also hold a 40% working interests in 2
other areas declared commercial by Shell, as operator, in the northern Santos Basin.
After the commerciality declarations, we consider the light oil and natural gas discovery made
in the pre-salt section in the ultra-deep waters of the Santos Basin to be the most important news
of the year. In order to reach the light oil and natural gas reservoirs, more than 2,000 meters of
salt layers were drilled at a depth of more than 2,000 meters. This discovery is promising for the
exploration of the pre-salt section in the deep and ultra-deep waters of the Santos Basin, as well
as in the deep and ultra-deep waters of other basins in the Brazilian Margin.
In the offshore Espírito Santo Basin, 2 new fields, the Carapó and Camarupim, were defined,
and 2 other areas were incorporated to the ring-fences of the Golfinho and Canapu fields. Onshore,
3 new oilfields were defined: the Saira, Seriema and Tabuiaiá fields.
The declarations of commercial feasibility in the Campos Basin include 10 new areas. Seven of
them were classified as the new fields of Maromba, Carataí, Carapicu, Catuá, Caxaréu, Mangangá and
Pirambú. Three other were incorporated to the existing ring-fences of the Marlim Leste, Viola and
Baleia Azul fields. Another important discovery was made inside the limits of the ring-fence of
the Roncador field, in deeper reservoirs than the reservoirs that generally produce such volumes.
Five other declarations of commercial feasibility were made in the north-northeastern onshore
basins. Four of them originated the new fields of Tangará (Reconcavo Basin) and Pintassilgo,
Patativa and Jaçanã (Potiguar Basin). Another area was incorporated into the ring-fence of the
Baixa do Juazeiro Field, and in the Paleozoic Solimões Basin (in the field of Araracanga) was
declared commercial.
We had a 48.7% success ratio for our exploration wells during 2006, with 39 wells out of 80
exploratory wells classified as discovery or producing wells.
Auctions of exploration rights
Since 1999, ANP has conducted auctions of exploration rights, which are open to us and
qualified companies. We have competed in the public auctions, acquiring a large number of
exploration rights, as detailed in the table below. We have also relinquished a considerable number
of the exploratory areas in which we were not interested or successful in exploring.
33
The following chart summarizes our success in the exploration bidding rounds conducted by the
ANP during the last three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration |
|
Development |
|
Production |
|
Total |
Event |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Areas held (December 31, 2003) |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
Areas won on Bid, Round 6 |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Areas obtained through acquisitions (BT-REC-4,
BT-POT-9, BT-ES-4, BM-C-14, BM-S-14 and BM-S-22) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Joint concession SMI to PJ (4) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
New concession (January 15, 2004) (Baleia Franca) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
New concession (January 15, 2004) (Golfinho) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
New concession (January 15, 2004) (Mexilhão) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
New concession (January 19, 2004) (Azulão) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
New concession (January 19, 2004) (Japim) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
New concession (August 30, 2004) (Piranema) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
New concession (December 20, 2004) (Baleia Anã) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
New concession (December 20, 2004) (Baleia Azul) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
New concession (December 20, 2004) (Baleia Bicuda) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
New concession (December 22, 2004) (Salema Branca) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Areas held (December 31, 2004) |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
Areas won on Bid, Round 7 |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
Areas relinquished (until December 31, 2005)
(BM-FZA-1) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
New concession (February 1, 2005) (Jandaia) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
New concession (April 4, 2005) (Anambé) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
New concession (July 14, 2005) (Acauã) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
New concession (November 24, 2005) (Inhambu) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
New concession (December 27, 2005) (Papa-Terra) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
New concession (December 29, 2005) (Uruguá) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
New concession (December 29, 2005) (Tambaú) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
New concession (December 29, 2005) (Canapú) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Areas redefined (January 17, 2005) (Rio Joanes) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Areas redefined (February 1, 2005) (Fazenda Sori) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Areas redefined (February 25, 2005) (Camaçari) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Areas redefined (March 3, 2005) (Jandaia) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Areas redefined (April 1, 2005) (Fazenda Matinha) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Areas redefined (April 12, 2005) (Quererá) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Areas redefined (June 18, 2005) (Rio da Serra) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Areas redefined (August 11, 2005) (Anambé) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Areas redefined (August 13, 2005) (Fazenda Santa Rosa) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Areas redefined (November 24, 2005) (Inhambu) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Joint concession BBI to CHT(5) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Joint concession NPE to DEN (6) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Total areas held (as of December 31, 2005) |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
Net area held in thousands of acres (as of December
31, 2005) |
|
|
31,727 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
3,008 |
|
|
|
35,258 |
|
Areas won on Bid Round 8 |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Areas relinquished (until December 31, 2006) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
New Concessions |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Areas redefined |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Total areas held (as of Dec. 31, 2006) |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
Net area held in thousands of acres (as of December
31, 2006) |
|
|
29,716 |
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
2,888 |
|
|
|
33,796 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
COG Córrego Grande, CCN Córrego Cedro Grande |
|
(2) |
|
CDL Cardeal, MP Massapê |
|
(3) |
|
CR Curió, FBL Fazenda Belém |
|
(4) |
|
SMI São Miguel, PJ Pajeú |
|
(5) |
|
BBI Baleia Bicuda, CHT Cachalote |
|
(6) |
|
NPE Norte de Pescada, DEN Dentão Joint Ventures |
34
In Bid Round 8, held December 28, 2006, we acquired 21 new exploration concessions, 14 to
be operated in partnership. As the public auction conducted by the ANP was interrupted by a court
decision, the exploration contracts were not signed with the ANP, and consequently, the 14
exploration agreements with the partners have not yet been finalized.
As of December 31, 2006, we had 154 exploration agreements and 305 production agreements. In
69 of the 154 exploration agreements, we are exclusively responsible for conducting the exploration
activities. Our participation ranges from 20% to 85% in the 85 exploration agreements in
partnership, and in 54 of them we are responsible for conducting the exploration activities. As of
December 31, 2006, we had partnerships in exploration with 21 foreign and domestic companies.
Drilling Activities
During 2006, we drilled a total of 411 wells, 331 development wells and 80 exploratory wells.
Of those wells, 283 development wells and 50 exploratory wells were located onshore and 48
development wells and 30 exploratory wells were located offshore. These numbers refer to the wells
we drilled in 2006, but such wells may not have been evaluated or reclassified in 2006.
We plan to expand exploration and development activities in 2007 by:
|
|
|
drilling approximately 114 new exploratory and approximately 400 new development wells; |
|
|
|
|
shooting and processing two-dimensional and three-dimensional seismic surveys; and |
|
|
|
|
constructing onshore and offshore production and support facilities. |
The following table sets forth our fleet of drilling rig units. We will use these owned and
leased rigs to support future exploration, production and development activities. Most of the
offshore rigs are operated in the Campos Basin.
DRILLING UNITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
Brazil |
|
International |
|
Brazil |
|
International |
|
Brazil |
|
International |
Land rigs for
onshore exploration
and development |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Owned |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Leased |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Semi-submersible rigs |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Owned |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Leased |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Drill ships |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Owned |
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Leased |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Jack-up rigs |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Owned |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Leased |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Moduled rigs for
offshore exploration
and development |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Owned |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Leased |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
Total |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Development Activities
Development occurs after completion of exploration and appraisal, and prior to hydrocarbon
production, and involves the installation of production facilities including platforms and
pipelines. We have an active
35
development program in existing fields and in the discovery and recovery of new reserve finds.
Since the 1980s, we have concentrated development investments in the deepwater fields located in
the Campos Basin, where most of our proved reserves are located. We develop fields in stages of
production, which we refer to as modules. As of December 31, 2006, we had a total of 8,412 oil and
gas producing wells in Brazil, of which 7,699 were onshore and 713 were offshore.
The following table describes our main production development projects fields in the various
basins and their production capacity :
Main Domestic Production Development Projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unit |
|
Production |
|
Capacity |
|
Water |
|
Production |
|
Injection |
|
|
|
|
Field |
|
Type |
|
Unit |
|
(bpd) |
|
Depth (m) |
|
Wells |
|
Wells |
|
Start Up (year) |
|
Observation |
Albacora Leste (1) |
|
FPSO |
|
P-50 |
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
2,006 |
|
|
|
Golfinho Module 1 |
|
FPSO |
|
Capixaba |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2,006 |
|
|
Chartered from SBM |
Jubarte Phase I |
|
FPSO |
|
P-34 |
|
|
60,000 |
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,006 |
|
|
|
Espadarte Module 2 |
|
FPSO |
|
Cidade do Rio de Janeiro |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
1,350 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
Chartered from Modec |
Golfinho Module 2 |
|
FPSO |
|
Cidade de Vitória |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
Chartered from Saipen |
Piranema |
|
SS |
|
P-300 |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
Chartered from Sevan Marine |
Roncador Phase II |
|
SS |
|
P-52 |
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
Roncador Module 2 |
|
FPSO |
|
P-54 |
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
Jabuti |
|
FPSO |
|
Cidade de Niterói |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
1,400 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
0 |
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
Chartered from Modec |
Marlim Sul Module 2 |
|
SS |
|
P-51 |
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
1,255 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
Frade (2) |
|
FPSO |
|
n/a |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
900 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
Marlim Leste |
|
FPU |
|
P-53 |
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
Jubarte Phase II |
|
FPSO |
|
P-57 |
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
Parque das Conchas (3) |
|
n/a |
|
n/a |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
2,011 |
|
|
|
Roncador Module 3 |
|
SS |
|
P-55 |
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
1,795 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Petrobras (operator) 90%, YPF 10%. |
|
(2) |
|
Petrobras 30%, Chevron (operator) 51.74%, Frade Japão 18.26%. |
|
(3) |
|
Petrobras 35%, Shell (operator) 50%, ONGC 15%. |
Abbreviations:
SS = Semisubmersible
FPSO = Floating, Production, Storage and Offloading
FPU = Floating and Production Unit
Some of these fields are being financed through project financings. See Item 5.
Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsLiquidity and Capital ResourcesProject Finance.
Production Activities
Our domestic crude oil and natural gas production activities involve fields located on
Brazils continental shelf off the coast of nine Brazilian states, of which the Campos Basin is the
most important region, and onshore in
36
eight Brazilian states. We are also producing crude oil and
natural gas in nine other countries: Angola, Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Mexico, Peru,
the United States, and Venezuela. See International.
The following table sets forth average daily crude oil and natural gas production, average
sales price and average lifting costs for each of 2006, 2005 and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Crude Oil and NGL Production (in Mbpd) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campos Basin |
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
1,204 |
|
Other |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total offshore |
|
|
1,546 |
|
|
|
1,441 |
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
Onshore |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Brazil |
|
|
1,778 |
|
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
|
1,493 |
|
International |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-consolidated international production (2) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total crude oil and NGL production |
|
|
1,920 |
|
|
|
1,847 |
|
|
|
1,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude Oil and NGL Average Sales Price (U.S. dollars per Bbl) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
$ |
54.71 |
|
|
$ |
45.42 |
|
|
$ |
33.49 |
|
International |
|
|
44.02 |
|
|
|
34.91 |
|
|
|
26.51 |
|
Natural Gas Production (in Mmcfpd) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campos Basin |
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
752 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
Other |
|
|
257 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total offshore |
|
|
1,016 |
|
|
|
924 |
|
|
|
829 |
|
Onshore |
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Brazil |
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
1,590 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
575 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-consolidated international production (2) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total natural gas production |
|
|
2,267 |
|
|
|
2,218 |
|
|
|
2,154 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Average Sales Price (U.S. dollars per Mcf) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil (4) |
|
$ |
2.61 |
|
|
$ |
2.17 |
|
|
$ |
1.93 |
|
International (5) |
|
|
2.16 |
|
|
|
1.64 |
|
|
|
1.17 |
|
Aggregate Average Lifting Costs (oil and natural gas) (U.S. dollars per boe) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With government take |
|
$ |
17.64 |
|
|
$ |
14.73 |
|
|
$ |
10.72 |
|
Without government take |
|
|
6.59 |
|
|
|
5.73 |
|
|
|
4.28 |
|
International |
|
|
3.36 |
|
|
|
2.90 |
|
|
|
2.60 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Brazilian figures include production from shale oil reserves and natural gas liquids, which
are not included in our proved reserves figures. |
|
(2) |
|
Equity method companies in Venezuela. |
|
(3) |
|
Brazilian figures include reinjected gas volumes, which are not included in our proved
reserves figures. |
|
(4) |
|
Excludes (1) exploration and production overhead; (2) costs related to intra-company
transfers of oil products to our exploration and production division; (3) costs of sales of
oil products produced in natural plants overseen by our exploration and production department;
and (4) price of oil and gas bought from partners in certain joint ventures. |
|
(5) |
|
Excludes (1) royalties; (2) special government participation; and (3) rental of areas. |
Average Brazilian production of crude oil and NGL for 2006 increased 5.6% relative to
2005, reaching 1,778 Mbpd, principally as a result of the start-up of the P-50 platform in April
2006, the FPSO-Capixaba in May 2006 and the P-34 platform in December 2006.
37
Reserves
Our estimated worldwide proved reserves of crude oil and natural gas as of December 31, 2006
totaled 11.46 billion barrels of oil equivalent, including:
|
|
|
9.48 billion barrels of crude oil and NGLs; and |
|
|
|
|
11,843.4 billion cubic feet of natural gas. |
We calculate reserves based on forecasts of field production, which depend on a number of
technical parameters, such as seismic interpretation, geological maps, well tests and economic
data. All reserve estimates involve some degree of uncertainty. The uncertainty depends mainly on
the amount of reliable geologic and engineering data available at the time of the estimate and the
interpretation of this data. Therefore, the estimates are made using the most reliable data at the
time of the estimate, in accordance with the best practices in the oil and gas industry.
DeGolyer and MacNaughton, or D&M, reviewed and certified 92% of our domestic proved crude oil,
condensate and natural gas reserve estimates as of December 31, 2006. The estimates for the
certification were performed in accordance with Rule 4-10 of Regulation S-X of the SEC.
As of December 31, 2006, our domestic proved developed crude oil reserves represented 44% of
our total domestic proved developed and undeveloped crude oil reserves. Our domestic proved
developed natural gas reserves represented 44% of our total domestic proved developed and
undeveloped natural gas reserves. Total domestic proved crude oil reserves increased at an average
annual growth rate of 3.3% in the last five years. Natural gas proved reserves increased at an
average annual growth rate of 6.5% over the same period.
The following table sets forth our estimated net proved developed and undeveloped reserves and
net proved developed reserves of crude oil and natural gas by region as of December 31, 2006, 2005
and 2004:
WORLDWIDE ESTIMATED NET PROVED RESERVES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
Global |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural |
|
|
|
|
|
Crude |
|
Natural |
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
|
Crude Oil |
|
Gas(1) |
|
Combined(2) |
|
Oil |
|
Gas(1) |
|
Combined(2) |
|
Reserves |
|
|
(MMbbl) |
|
(Bcf) |
|
(Mmboe) |
|
(MMbbl) |
|
(Bcf) |
|
(Mmboe) |
|
(Mmboe) |
Net Proved Developed and
Undeveloped Reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves as of December 31, 2004 |
|
|
9,243.4 |
|
|
|
7,954.3 |
|
|
|
10,569.1 |
|
|
|
702.0 |
|
|
|
3,292.8 |
|
|
|
1,250.9 |
|
|
|
11,820.0 |
|
Revisions of previous estimates |
|
|
123.0 |
|
|
|
842.4 |
|
|
|
263.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
(32.6 |
) |
|
|
(4.97 |
) |
|
|
258.4 |
|
Extensions, discoveries and
improved recovery |
|
|
252.0 |
|
|
|
996.9 |
|
|
|
418.2 |
|
|
|
38.4 |
|
|
|
38.8 |
|
|
|
44.9 |
|
|
|
463.1 |
|
Production for the year |
|
|
(584.5 |
) |
|
|
(529.8 |
) |
|
|
(672.8 |
) |
|
|
(58.8 |
) |
|
|
(210.9 |
) |
|
|
(93.9 |
) |
|
|
(766.7 |
) |
Reserves as of December 31, 2005 |
|
|
9,033.9 |
|
|
|
9,263.8 |
|
|
|
10,577.8 |
|
|
|
682.1 |
|
|
|
3,088.1 |
|
|
|
1,196.8 |
|
|
|
11,774.6 |
|
Revisions of previous estimates |
|
|
463.4 |
|
|
|
322.1 |
|
|
|
517.2 |
|
|
|
(15.2 |
) |
|
|
(459.1 |
) |
|
|
(91.7 |
) |
|
|
425.5 |
|
Extensions, discoveries and
improved recovery |
|
|
119.7 |
|
|
|
328.2 |
|
|
|
174.4 |
|
|
|
28.1 |
|
|
|
75.1 |
|
|
|
40.6 |
|
|
|
215.0 |
|
Sales of reserves in place |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
Purchase of reserves in place |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
45.8 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
Production for the year |
|
|
(616.0 |
) |
|
|
(532.9 |
) |
|
|
(704.8 |
) |
|
|
(42.6 |
) |
|
|
(209.8 |
) |
|
|
(77.6 |
) |
|
|
(782.3 |
) |
Interest Loss in Venezuela (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(174.8 |
) |
|
|
(93.9 |
) |
|
|
(190.5 |
) |
|
|
(190.5 |
) |
Transfer to Unconsolidated
Companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65.7 |
) |
|
|
(77.3 |
) |
|
|
(78.6 |
) |
|
|
(78.6 |
) |
Reserves as of December 31, 2006 |
|
|
9,001.9 |
|
|
|
9,427.0 |
|
|
|
10,573.1 |
|
|
|
416.3 |
|
|
|
2,339.1 |
|
|
|
806.2 |
|
|
|
11,379.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proved Developed Reserves: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2004 |
|
|
4,129.8 |
|
|
|
4,427.6 |
|
|
|
4,867.7 |
|
|
|
383.1 |
|
|
|
2,495.2 |
|
|
|
799.0 |
|
|
|
5,666.7 |
|
As of December 31, 2005 |
|
|
4,071.7 |
|
|
|
4,088.8 |
|
|
|
4,753.2 |
|
|
|
365.9 |
|
|
|
2,333.7 |
|
|
|
754.9 |
|
|
|
5,508.1 |
|
As of December 31, 2006 |
|
|
3,987.7 |
|
|
|
4,115.4 |
|
|
|
4,673.6 |
|
|
|
232.9 |
|
|
|
1,758.0 |
|
|
|
525.9 |
|
|
|
5,199.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved Reserves in Unconsolidated
Companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.7 |
|
|
|
77.3 |
|
|
|
78.6 |
|
|
|
78.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Proved Reserves as of
December 31, 2006 (4) |
|
|
9,001.9 |
|
|
|
9,427.0 |
|
|
|
10,573.1 |
|
|
|
482.0 |
|
|
|
2,416.4 |
|
|
|
884.8 |
|
|
|
11,457.9 |
|
38
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Natural gas liquids are extracted and recovered at natural gas processing plants downstream
from the field. The volumes presented for natural gas reserves are prior to the extraction of
natural gas liquids. |
|
(2) |
|
See Conversion Table for the ratios used to convert cubic feet of natural gas to barrels of
crude oil equivalent. Production of shale oil and associated reserves are not included. |
|
(3) |
|
Changes due to contractual changes (Joint Ventures to Unconsolidated Companies). |
|
(4) |
|
Total Proved Reserves as of December 31, 2006 equals Reserves as of December 31, 2006 plus
Proved Reserves in Unconsolidated Companies. |
The following tables set forth our crude oil and natural gas proved reserves by region, as of
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004:
CRUDE OIL NET PROVED RESERVES BY REGION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
Developed |
|
|
|
|
|
Developed |
|
|
|
|
Developed and |
|
Proved |
|
and |
|
Proved |
|
and |
|
Proved |
|
|
Undeveloped |
|
Developed |
|
Undeveloped |
|
Developed |
|
Undeveloped |
|
Developed |
|
|
(MMbbl) |
Brazil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campos Basin |
|
|
7,855.4 |
|
|
|
3,305.4 |
|
|
|
7,886.0 |
|
|
|
3,395.9 |
|
|
|
8,130.4 |
|
|
|
3,422.7 |
|
Other |
|
|
373.7 |
|
|
|
131.8 |
|
|
|
388.3 |
|
|
|
101.3 |
|
|
|
335.4 |
|
|
|
106.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total offshore |
|
|
8,229.1 |
|
|
|
3,437.2 |
|
|
|
8,274.3 |
|
|
|
3,497.2 |
|
|
|
8,465.8 |
|
|
|
3,528.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onshore |
|
|
772.8 |
|
|
|
550.5 |
|
|
|
759.6 |
|
|
|
574.5 |
|
|
|
777.6 |
|
|
|
601.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Brazil |
|
|
9,001.9 |
|
|
|
3,987.7 |
|
|
|
9,033.9 |
|
|
|
4,071.7 |
|
|
|
9,243.4 |
|
|
|
4,129.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other South America(1) |
|
|
408.2 |
|
|
|
252.2 |
|
|
|
625.8 |
|
|
|
350.8 |
|
|
|
678.4 |
|
|
|
367.0 |
|
West Coast of Africa |
|
|
42.0 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
Gulf of Mexico |
|
|
31.8 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
13.7 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Total international |
|
|
482.0 |
|
|
|
269.6 |
|
|
|
682.1 |
|
|
|
365.9 |
|
|
|
702.0 |
|
|
|
383.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
9,483.9 |
|
|
|
4,257.3 |
|
|
|
9,716.0 |
|
|
|
4,437.6 |
|
|
|
9,945.4 |
|
|
|
4,512.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes Argentina, Bolivia Colombia, Ecuador, Peru and proportional reserves related to
unconsolidated companies in Venezuela. |
NATURAL GAS NET PROVED RESERVES BY REGION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
Developed |
|
|
|
|
|
Developed |
|
|
|
|
Developed and |
|
Proved |
|
and |
|
Proved |
|
and |
|
Proved |
|
|
Undeveloped |
|
Developed |
|
Undeveloped |
|
Developed |
|
Undeveloped |
|
Developed |
|
|
(Bcf) |
Brazil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Offshore |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campos Basin |
|
|
4,043.1 |
|
|
|
1,748.0 |
|
|
|
3,836.5 |
|
|
|
1,772.3 |
|
|
|
4,039.3 |
|
|
|
1,820.4 |
|
Other |
|
|
2,985.7 |
|
|
|
918.5 |
|
|
|
2,912.1 |
|
|
|
720.9 |
|
|
|
1,337.5 |
|
|
|
854.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total offshore |
|
|
7,028.8 |
|
|
|
2,666.5 |
|
|
|
6,748.6 |
|
|
|
2,493.2 |
|
|
|
5,376.8 |
|
|
|
2,674.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Onshore |
|
|
2,398.2 |
|
|
|
1,448.9 |
|
|
|
2,515.2 |
|
|
|
1,595.6 |
|
|
|
2,577.5 |
|
|
|
1,753.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Brazil |
|
|
9,427.0 |
|
|
|
4,115.4 |
|
|
|
9,263.8 |
|
|
|
4,088.8 |
|
|
|
7,954.3 |
|
|
|
4,427.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other South America(1) |
|
|
2,241.7 |
|
|
|
1,688.9 |
|
|
|
2,951.7 |
|
|
|
2,270.2 |
|
|
|
3,162.2 |
|
|
|
2,456.2 |
|
Gulf of Mexico |
|
|
174.7 |
|
|
|
112.2 |
|
|
|
136.5 |
|
|
|
63.5 |
|
|
|
130.6 |
|
|
|
39.0 |
|
Total international |
|
|
2,416.4 |
|
|
|
1,801.1 |
|
|
|
3,088.1 |
|
|
|
2,333.7 |
|
|
|
3,292.8 |
|
|
|
2,495.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
11,843.4 |
|
|
|
5,916.5 |
|
|
|
12,351.9 |
|
|
|
6,422.5 |
|
|
|
11,247.1 |
|
|
|
6,922.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia, Peru and proportional reserves related to
unconsolidated companies in Venezuela. |
39
Please see Supplementary Information on Oil and Gas Producing Activities in our audited
consolidated financial statements for further details on our proved reserves.
Refining, Transportation and Marketing
Summary and Strategy
Our refining, transportation and marketing business segment encompasses the refining,
transportation and marketing of crude oil, oil products and fuel alcohol, including investments in
petrochemicals.
We own and operate 11 refineries in Brazil, with total processing capacity of 1,986 million
barrels per day. With the acquisition of the Ipiranga Group, one-third of the Ipiranga Refinery
became part of the Petrobras assets. After this acquisition, only one independent refinery in
Brazil remains. This refinery has an aggregate installed capacity of approximately 0.03 million
barrels per day. Our domestic refining capacity constitutes 98.4% of the Brazilian refining
capacity. We built nine of our 11 refineries prior to 1972, and we completed the last refinery
(Henrique Lage) in 1980. At that time, we were only producing 200 Mbpd of crude oil in Brazil. Our
refineries were built to process light imported crude oil. Subsequent to their completion, we
discovered large reserves of heavier crude oil in Brazil. As a result, we are continually upgrading
and improving our refineries to process large quantities of heavy crude oil.
We approved initial studies for construction of a new refinery in the Northeast of Brazil.
With an estimated investment of U.S.$2.88 billion in the industrial complex of Porto de Suape, in
the state of Pernambuco. The refinery will have the capacity to process 200 Mbpd of heavy oil with
the start of operations planned for 2011.
We process as much of our domestically produced crude oil as possible through our refineries,
and supply the remaining demand within Brazil by importing crude oil (which we also process in our
refineries) and oil products. As our own domestic production increases and refinery upgrades enable
us to process more throughput efficiently in the next few years, we expect to import
proportionately less crude oil and oil products. Until January of 2002, we were the sole supplier
of oil products to the Brazilian market. Now that we are no longer the sole supplier of oil
products to the Brazilian market, we intend to reevaluate our import strategy and may reduce
imports to the extent such reductions improve our profitability. We also export crude oil and oil
products, to the extent that our production of oil products exceeds Brazilian demand or our
refineries are unable to process the growing domestic crude oil production.
We transport oil products and crude oil to domestic wholesale and export markets through a
coordinated network of marketing centers, storage facilities, pipelines and shipping vessels. As
the single supplier for almost fifty years of a country that ranks as the 12th largest
oil-consuming nation in the world, according to the June 2006 issue of Statistical Review of the
World, we have developed a large and complex infrastructure. Our refineries are generally located
near Brazils population and industrial centers and near our production areas, which creates
logistical efficiencies in our operations.
In accordance with the requirements of the Oil Law, we have placed our shipping assets into a
separate subsidiary, Petrobras Transporte S.A., or Transpetro. This subsidiary leases storage and
pipeline facilities and provides open access to these assets to all market participants. Our
petrochemicals business is now also included in the refining, transportation and marketing segment.
Our main strategies in refining and transportation are to:
|
|
|
focus on clients and develop our portfolio of goods and services based on their needs; |
|
|
|
|
expand our processing, transportation and commercialization activities, using
bio-energy sources and raw material produced by us; |
|
|
|
|
diversify our business portfolio, focusing on synergies among assets; |
|
|
|
|
expand activities in the petrochemical and fertilizer industries, by seeking
strategic partnerships and promoting synergies with our other operations; |
40
|
|
|
improve efficiency in all stages of logistic processes by using a variety of
transportation systems and focusing on operational excellence, safety standards and
high quality services; and |
|
|
|
|
apply state of the art technology in oil processing to promote energy and
environmental efficiency. |
Our refining, transportation and marketing results are reflected in the Supply segment in
our audited consolidated financial statements.
Refining
At December 31, 2006, we had total installed refining capacity in Brazil of 1.986 million
barrels per day, which, according to Petroleum Intelligence Weekly, made us the 8th
largest refiner of oil products in the world among publicly traded companies in 2006. In Brazil, we
processed an average of 1.746 million barrels of crude oil per day in 2006, which represents a
utilization rate of 88% for the year, calculated over total distillation capacity. This compares
with an 85% average utilization rate in 2005 and an 86% average utilization rate in 2004.
Approximately 80% of the crude oil feedstock for our refinery operations in Brazil was
supplied by domestic production, as compared to 80% in 2005 and 76% in 2004. We expect an
increasing percentage of the crude oil feedstock to be supplied by our relatively lower cost
domestic production, as our overall domestic production increases. Because our domestic refining
capacity constitutes 98.4% of the Brazilian refining capacity, we supply almost all of the refined
product needs of third-party wholesalers, exporters and petrochemical companies, in addition to
satisfying our internal consumption requirements with respect to wholesale marketing operations and
petrochemical feedstock.
Our refineries are located throughout Brazil, with heavy concentration in the Southeast where
demand for domestic products is greatest, due to significant industrial activity and large
population centers. Most of our refineries are located near our crude oil pipelines, storage
facilities, refined product pipelines and major petrochemical facilities. This configuration
facilitates access to crude oil supply and major end-user markets in Brazil.
Refinery Production and Capacity
In Brazil in 2006, we produced a total of 644 million barrels of oil products, or on daily
basis 1,764 million barrels per day. Approximately 80% of this crude oil came from Brazilian
production. Our average refining costs (consisting of variable costs and excluding depreciation and
amortization) in Brazil were U.S.$2.29 per barrel in 2006, U.S.$1.90 per barrel in 2005 and
U.S.$1.38 per barrel in 2004. According to our strategic plan, because of the heavier crude
characteristic of many Brazilian fields, we have also invested in hydro-treatment facilities to
reduce impurities in our refinerys oil products and to facilitate the conversion of heavy crude
oil into lighter products. As a result, our refining costs have been increasing because the
throughput has remained stable. The majority of our heavy crude conversion capacity is located in
our refineries: Landulpho Alves, Duque de Caxias, Paulínia, Presidente Bernardes, Gabriel Passos
and Henrique Lage. The following table describes the installed capacity, refining throughput and
utilization factor of our refineries for each of 2006, 2005 and 2004:
41
REFINING STATISTICS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
Capacity |
|
Throughput(1) |
|
Utilization(2) |
|
Capacity |
|
Throughput(1) |
|
Utilization(2) |
|
Capacity |
|
Throughput(1) |
|
Utilization(2) |
Refineries |
|
(Mbpd) |
|
(Mbpd) |
|
(%) |
|
(Mbpd) |
|
(Mbpd) |
|
(%) |
|
(Mbpd) |
|
(Mbpd) |
|
(%) |
Paulínia |
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
320 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
365 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
Landulpho Alves (8) |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
Duque de Caxias (8) |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
Henrique Lage |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
Alberto Pasqualini(3) |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Pres. Getúlio Vargas(4) |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Pres. Bernardes |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Gabriel Passos |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
136 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Manaus |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
Capuava |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Fortaleza |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Total Brazilian (8) |
|
|
1,986 |
|
|
|
1746 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
2,027 |
|
|
|
1,726 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
1,985 |
|
|
|
1,704 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pasadena (9) |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gualberto Villarroel(5) |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Ricardo Eliçabe(6) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
Guillermo Elder Bell(5) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
San Lorenzo (6) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
Del Norte (7) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total International |
|
|
241 |
|
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
2,227 |
|
|
|
1,940 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
2,156 |
|
|
|
1,830 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
2,114 |
|
|
|
1,805 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Throughput does not include slop or any reprocessed feedstock. |
|
(2) |
|
Utilization was calculated based on crude oil and NGL only. |
|
(3) |
|
We own 70% of this refinery. |
|
(4) |
|
Because of improvements to the crude plant of this refinery, its output can now slightly
exceed the nameplate capacity originally registered with and acknowledged by the National
Petroleum Agency in Brazil in 2003. |
|
(5) |
|
Located in Bolivia. |
|
(6) |
|
Located in Argentina. |
|
(7) |
|
Located in Argentina. Del Norte statistics are not included since we own just 28.5% of that
refinery. |
|
(8) |
|
Includes NGL Capacity (Mbpd): Landulpho Alves = 9, Duque de Caxias = 33 in 2005. |
|
(9) |
|
Located in the United States. We acquired 50% of this refinery in September 2006 and we
started operations in October 2006. We are not including the full years information, rather
the last three months figures only in calculating the average. |
We operate our refineries, to the extent possible, to satisfy Brazilian demand. Brazil
demands a proportionally high amount of diesel, relative to gasoline, which together represent more
than half of our production. Because we operate refineries to maximize the output of diesel fuel
for which demand in Brazil is greater than our internal production, we produce volumes of gasoline
and fuel oil in excess of Brazilian demand and such excess must be exported.
Brazils demand for oil products has been relatively constant for the last three years, but we
continue to increase our refinery throughput, thereby reducing the amount of products we must
import to satisfy demand. We have also increased our exports of refined products. The following
table sets forth our domestic production volume for our principal oil products for each of 2006,
2005 and 2004:
42
DOMESTIC PRODUCTION VOLUME OF OIL PRODUCTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
% |
|
2005 |
|
% |
|
2004 |
|
% |
|
|
(Mbpd) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Mbpd) |
|
|
|
|
|
(Mbpd) |
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diesel |
|
|
665.8 |
|
|
|
37.8 |
|
|
|
660.1 |
|
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
657.0 |
|
|
|
38.7 |
|
Gasoline |
|
|
345.3 |
|
|
|
19.5 |
|
|
|
324.5 |
|
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
292.8 |
|
|
|
17.3 |
|
Fuel oil |
|
|
259.0 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
257.8 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
279.9 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
Naphtha and jet fuel |
|
|
212.1 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
218.5 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
220.2 |
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
Other |
|
|
281.4 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
274.3 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
|
245.7 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
1,763.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
1,735.2 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
1,695.6 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Refinery Investments and Improvements
In recent years, we have made investments in our refinery assets in order to improve yields of
middle and lighter distillates, which typically generate higher margin sales and reduce the need to
import such products. Our principal strategy with respect to refinery operations is to maximize
throughput of domestic crude oil. Since the heavy domestic crude oil produces a higher proportion
of fuel oil for each barrel of crude oil processed, production of fuel oil is expected to remain
relatively constant as throughput of additional Brazilian crude oil offsets new investment in
conversion capacity and the production of coke which can be converted into middle distillates
products.
We plan to invest in refinery projects designed to:
|
|
|
enhance the value of Brazilian crude oil by increasing capacity to refine greater
quantities of heavier crude oil that is produced domestically; |
|
|
|
|
increase production of oil products demanded by the Brazilian market that we
currently must import, such as diesel; |
|
|
|
|
improve gasoline and diesel quality to comply with stricter environmental
regulations currently being implemented; and |
|
|
|
|
reduce emissions and pollutant streams. |
Major Refinery Projects
Included in our Strategic Plan are a number of upgrades to key refineries. Our major
investments are generally (1) coker to further break down heavy oil into middle distillates or (2)
hydro-treatment units that reduce sulfur to produce products that meet international standards. We
believe our hydro-treatment units will make it possible to offer diesel fuel containing a maximum
sulfur content of 0.05% (starting in 2009), thus meeting stricter environmental standards being
implemented under Brazilian law. The principal refineries and planned investments (2007 2011) are
as follows:
43
|
|
|
Refinery |
|
Objective |
Alberto Pasqualini (REFAP)
|
|
Units to upgrade gasoline and diesel quality. |
|
|
|
Presidente Getúlio Vargas Refinery (REPAR)
|
|
Expansion and metallurgic adaptation of existing
distillation unit to increase heavy oil processing,
installation of a coker, expansion of existing
refinery unit and units to upgrade the quality of
diesel and gasoline, and creation of a propylene
unit. |
|
|
|
Henrique Lage (REVAP)
|
|
Metallurgic adaptation of existing distillation
unit to increase heavy oil processing, installation
of a coker and units to upgrade the quality of
diesel and gasoline, and creation of a propylene
unit. |
|
|
|
Paulínia Refinery (REPLAN)
|
|
Expansion and metallurgic adaptation of existing
distillation unit to increase heavy oil processing,
installation of other coker, and units to upgrade
the quality of diesel and gasoline, and creation of
a propylene unit. |
|
|
|
Landulpho Alves (RLAM)
|
|
Expansion and metallurgic adaptation of existing
distillation unit to increase heavy oil processing,
expansion of existing refinery unit, installation
of a coker, and units to upgrade the quality of
diesel and gasoline. |
|
|
|
Duque de Caxias Refinery (REDUC)
|
|
Metallurgic adaptation of existing distillation
unit to increase heavy oil processing, expansion of
existing refinery unit, installation of a lube oil
unit, installation of a coker and units to upgrade
the quality of diesel and gasoline. |
|
|
|
Gabriel Passos Refinery (REGAP)
|
|
Metallurgic adaptation of existing distillation
unit to increase heavy oil processing, installation
of a coker, unit to upgrade the quality of diesel
and gasoline, and creation of a propylene unit. |
|
|
|
Presidente Bernardes Refinery (RPBC) |
|
Expansion and metallurgic adaptation of existing
distillation unit to increase heavy oil processing,
installation of a coker, and units to upgrade the
quality of diesel and gasoline. |
|
|
|
Capuava Refinery (RECAP)
|
|
Units to upgrade the quality of diesel and gasoline. |
|
|
|
Isaac Sabbá Refinery (REMAN)
|
|
Mild thermal cracking unit and units to upgrade the
quality of diesel and gasoline. |
|
|
|
Lubrificantes e Derivados de Petróleo do Nordeste (LUBNOR)
|
|
Units to improve the lube oil production. |
In addition to the refineries mentioned above, our 2007-2011 Business Plan envisions
investments in the New Abreu Lima refinery, to be installed in Pernambuco, and which is expected to
begin operations in 2011.
Imports
During 2006 we continued to import crude oil and oil products because domestic production was
not adequate to satisfy Brazilian demand for certain products. In addition, because the bulk of our
domestic reserves consist of heavy crude oil, we need to import lighter crude oils to create an
adequate mix of oils to satisfy Brazilian demand and to permit refining by our refineries.
44
Imported crude oil is transferred into our refineries for storage and processing, with a small
percentage being sold to the other two Brazilian refiners, including the recently purchased
Ipiranga refinery. Imported oil products are sold to the retail market in Brazil through
distributors, including our subsidiary BR.
The average daily volume of our imports of crude oil has increased to 370 Mbpd in 2006, as
compared to 352 Mbpd in 2005, because of the increase in the demand in the Brazilian market.
The following table sets forth the percentage of crude oil that we imported during each of
2006, 2005 and 2004 by region.
IMPORTS OF CRUDE OIL BY REGION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
Volume (%) |
Region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Africa |
|
|
70.6 |
% |
|
|
67.5 |
% |
|
|
73.4 |
% |
Middle East |
|
|
27.9 |
|
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
Central and South America/Caribbean |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Oceania |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Europe |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
In 2006, our total costs of imports of crude oil from all these regions was U.S.$7,007
million, as compared to U.S.$6,035 million in 2005 and U.S.$5,191 million in 2004.
Imports of oil products increased to 118 Mbpd in 2006, as compared to 94 Mbpd in 2005 and 110
Mbpd in 2004 primarily as a result of the increase in domestic consumption. For distillates, the
increase in the imported amounts is a result of the increase in the demand from the Brazilian
market. For naphtha, the decrease is a result of the increase in the imports by petrochemical
companies. The following table sets forth the volume of oil products imported during each of 2006,
2005 and 2004:
IMPORTS OF OIL PRODUCTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
Volume (Mbbl) |
Oil Product |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LPG |
|
|
9,936 |
|
|
|
6,268 |
|
|
|
11,537 |
|
Distillates(1) |
|
|
20,287 |
|
|
|
16,740 |
|
|
|
16,879 |
|
Naphtha |
|
|
7,329 |
|
|
|
8,243 |
|
|
|
7,231 |
|
Others(2) |
|
|
5,550 |
|
|
|
3,523 |
|
|
|
4,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
43,102 |
|
|
|
34,774 |
|
|
|
40,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes gasoline, diesel fuel and some intermediate fractions. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes Algerian NGLs, fuel oil, Ethanol, Methanol and others. |
In 2006, total costs of oil product imports, measured on a cost-insurance-and-freight
basis, was U.S.$3,692 million, as compared to U.S.$2,108 million in 2005 and U.S.$1,721 million in
2004. For a discussion of import purchase volumes and prices, see Item 5. Operating and Financial
Review and ProspectsSales Volumes and PricesImport Purchase Volumes and Prices.
Exports
We also export that portion of oil products processed by our refineries that exceed Brazilian
demand. In addition, we export domestic crude oil that we are unable to process efficiently in our
refineries because of limited conversion capacity. Our total exports increased to 214 MMbbl in 2006
from 193 MMbbl in 2005 as a result of the
45
increase in production of domestic crude oils and the adjustment in the local demand for
quality products. The following table sets forth the volumes of oil products we exported during
each of 2006, 2005 and 2004:
EXPORTS OF OIL AND OIL PRODUCTS(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(Mbbl) |
Crude Oil |
|
|
122,279 |
|
|
|
96,155 |
|
|
|
66,319 |
|
Fuel Oil (including bunker fuel) |
|
|
61,351 |
|
|
|
63,896 |
|
|
|
107,104 |
|
Gasoline |
|
|
16,018 |
|
|
|
17,240 |
|
|
|
11,510 |
|
Other (2) |
|
|
12,562 |
|
|
|
9,716 |
|
|
|
1,288 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
212,210 |
|
|
|
187,007 |
|
|
|
186,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The figure includes sales made by PifCo to unaffiliated third parties, including sales of
oil and oil products purchased internationally. |
|
(2) |
|
Not including fertilizers. |
The total value of our crude oil and oil products exports, measured on a free-on-board
basis, was U.S$11,989 million in 2006, U.S.$8,938 million in 2005 and U.S.$5,923 million in 2004.
Transportation
The Oil Law requires that a separate company operate and manage the transportation network for
crude oil, oil products and natural gas in Brazil, so we created a wholly-owned subsidiary,
Petrobras Transporte S.A.Transpetro, in 1998 to build and manage our vessels, pipelines and
maritime terminals and handle various other transportation activities. In May 2000, Transpetro also
took over the operation of our transportation network and storage terminals to comply with legal
requirements. As of October 1, 2001, with the approval from the ANP, these pipelines and terminals
were leased to Transpetro, which started to offer its transportation services to us and to third
parties. As the owner of the facilities leased to Transpetro, we retain the right of preference for
its use, based on the historical level of transportation assessed for each pipeline, formally
assigned by the ANP. The excess capacity is made available to third parties on a non-discriminatory
basis and under equal terms and conditions.
Prior to the enactment of the Oil Law, we were the only company authorized to ship oil
products to and from Brazil and to own and operate Brazilian pipelines. Pursuant to the Oil Law,
the ANP now has the power to authorize any company or consortium organized under Brazilian law to
transport crude oil, oil products and natural gas for use in the Brazilian market or in connection
with import or export activities, and to build facilities for use in any of these activities. The
Oil Law has also provided the basis for open competition in the construction and operation of
pipeline facilities.
Pipelines and Terminals
We own, operate and maintain an extensive network of crude oil, oil products and natural gas
pipelines connecting our terminals to refineries and other points of primary distribution
throughout Brazil. On December 31, 2006, our onshore and offshore crude oil and oil products
pipelines extended 6,280 miles or 10,104 kilometers in length, our natural gas pipelines aggregated
approximately 6,073 miles or 9,771 kilometers in length, including the Brazilian side (1,612 miles
or 2,593 kilometers) of the Bolivia-Brazil pipeline, and our flexible pipelines totaled 2,032 miles
or 3,269 kilometers in length.
46
NATURAL GAS PIPELINES IN BRAZIL
47
CRUDE OIL AND OIL PRODUCTS PIPELINES IN BRAZIL
An important project for the offshore loading of crude oil in the Campos Basin is the Plano
Diretor de Escoamento e Tratamento - PDET (Directors Plan for Draining and Treatment), which
consists of a fixed platform (PRA-1) connected to five offshore production platforms through
pipelines that will transfer the crude oil of these platforms to a floating, storage and offloading
platform (FSO) and two monobuoys, which will in turn facilitate the transfer of the crude oil to
shuttle tankers or the export of the crude oil to other countries. The shuttle tankers will
transport the oil to the Southeast terminals where it will be pumped to existing onshore pipelines
connected to refineries in Rio de Janeiro, Minas Gerais and São Paulo. The PDET project will cost
approximately U.S.$1.270 billion and is expected to start its operation in the second half of 2007.
This project will permit an increase in the flow of oil produced in the Campos Basin by up to 630
Mbpd. The PRA-1 platform was installed offshore in January 2007 and preparations are being made to
connect the platform to the sub-sea pipelines.
Transpetro also operates 44 storage terminals24 marine terminals and other 20 tankfarmswith
a nominal aggregate storage capacity of 65.0 million barrels of oil equivalent. At December 31,
2006, tank capacity at these terminals consisted of 35.2 million barrels of crude oil, 27.3 million
barrels of oil products and fuel alcohol and 2.5 million barrels of LPG. Transpetros marine
terminals operate an average of 5,000 vessels per year.
Transpetro is currently evaluating alternatives to improve the efficiency of its
transportation system, including improvements to the monitoring and control of the pipeline network
through the gradual implementation of a supervisory control and data acquisition system, which,
when completed, will monitor the pipelines and storage facilities located throughout the country.
Transpetro implemented the first phase of the project and inaugurated a centralized control
and operating center in June 2002, in its headquarters in Rio de Janeiro. Currently, there are a
national back-up master station and two regional master stations connected through satellite
communication. Tank-farms and pump stations are equipped with mini stations connected to the
regional master stations. In addition, Transpetro has been investing in the development of a
pipeline integrity program (Programa de Integridade de Dutos) to ensure the integrity and safety of
its pipeline operations.
48
Shipping
On December 31, 2006, our fleet consisted of the following 53 vessels (46 owned and 7 bareboat
chartered), 32 of which are single hulled and 21 of which are double hulled:
OWNED/BAREBOAT CHARTERED VESSELS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Capacity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(deadweight tonnage in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
thousands) |
Type of Vessel |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tankers |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
2,592.3 |
|
Liquefied petroleum gas tankers |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
40.2 |
|
AHTS Anchor Handling Tug Supply |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
FSO Floating, Storage and Offloading |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
28.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
2,663.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These vessels are currently operated by Transpetro and their activities are mainly
concentrated in the Brazilian coastline, South America (Venezuela and Argentina), Mediterranean
Sea, Caribbean Sea, Gulf of Mexico, West Africa and the Persian Gulf. The single-hulled ships only
operate in areas where environmental legislation permits, including Brazil, Venezuela, Argentina
and the West Coast of Africa. The double-hulled ships operate in other international locations in
accordance with applicable laws. Our shipping operations support the transportation
of crude oil from offshore production systems, our import and export of crude oil and oil
products and our coastal trade. In 2006, Transpetro increased shuttle operations in the Campos
basin by a chartered bareboat vessel, double-hulled, dynamic-positioned vessel with 1 million
barrels capacity. In 2007, two more vessels of the same type and same trade will be incorporated.
Our Business Plan calls for investments of U.S.$2.8 billion to renew our fleet, by adding 42
vessels by 2011. The table below sets forth the types of products and quantities of such products
we transported during each of the years indicated.
PRODUCTS AND QUANTITIES TRANSPORTED
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(millions of tons) |
Product |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crude oil |
|
|
106.85 |
|
|
|
92.38 |
|
|
|
88.4 |
|
Oil Products |
|
|
39.76 |
|
|
|
40.42 |
|
|
|
34.0 |
|
Fuel Alcohol |
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
146.69 |
|
|
|
132.84 |
|
|
|
122.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage transported by our owned/bareboat chartered fleet |
|
|
40.3 |
% |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
45.1 |
% |
Coastal transport as a percentage of total tonnage |
|
|
65 |
% |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
61.1 |
% |
The average monthly-chartered tonnage in 2006 amounted to 8.6 million deadweight tons, as
compared to 5.9 million deadweight tons in 2005 and 4.6 million deadweight tons in 2004. The
chartered tonnage is continuously adjusted to our needs for overall market supply cost reduction.
Our aggregate annual cost for vessel charters was U.S.$1,348.28 million in 2006, U.S.$972.01
million in 2005 and U.S.$701 million in 2004.
Petrochemicals
We conduct our petrochemical activities, with the exception of naphtha sales, through our
subsidiary, Petrobras Química S.A., or Petroquisa. Petroquisa is a holding company with interests
in nine operational petrochemical companies involved in the production and sale of basic and final
petrochemical products and utilities. On December 31, 2006, our ownership percentage of the total
capital of these investments ranged from 8.27% to 85.04% and our ownership percentage of the voting
capital of these investments ranged from 9.81% to 70.45%. The
49
total book value of these investments
was U.S.$924 million on December 31, 2006. Most of such interests are minority voting interests.
Our shareholders equity in these companies increased by U.S.$12 million between December 31, 2005
and December 31, 2006.
Shareholders at the Extraordinary General Meeting held on June 1, 2006 approved the
incorporation of shares in Petroquisa by us, pursuant to the re-ratification of the Protocol of
Merger and Incorporation of the share incorporation transaction executed by the two companies. Our
Board of Directors approved the issuance of 886,670 of our preferred shares in connection with the
incorporation of shares of Petroquisa by us. We held 99.99% of Petroquisas shares prior to such
incorporation.
To implement the transaction, the exchange ratio for the shares to be used was based on the
net equity value of both companies at the base date of December 31, 2005, when 4.496 preferred
shares issued by us were attributed to each batch of 1,000 common or preferred shares issued by
Petroquisa. As a result, the minority shareholders of Petroquisa became our shareholders.
None of our shareholders had stated their intention to exercise the right withdraw by the
legal deadline of July 7, 2006. Five of Petroquisas shareholders, with a total interest of
1,015,910 shares, exercised the right to withdraw by the established deadline (July 5, 2006) and
were reimbursed at the rate of R$153.47 (U.S.$71) per batch of 1,000 shares, using funds provided
by Petroquisa, on July 10, 2006. Petrobras then acquired the shares for the same price, thereby
transferring ownership.
The basic supply feedstock used in Brazils petrochemical industry is naphtha. Until 2001, we
were the sole supplier of naphtha to Brazils petrochemical industry. Following regulatory change
in 2002, the petrochemical
industry began importing naphtha and condensates directly. In 2006, the industry imported
approximately 30% of its naphtha needs, and we supplied the remainder from our refining operations.
We currently expect to maintain a presence in the petrochemicals industry principally by
participating in projects integrated with our refineries. We expect that our selective investments
in petrochemicals will consolidate our involvement in the entire value chain and will help
integrate our basic and refining products. Although we have divested certain interests in the
petrochemical segment in the past, we plan to increase the current level of investments, as part of
our downstream strategy.
On March 31, 2006, the construction of Rio Polímeros S.A (Gas Chemical Complex), located next
to our Duque de Caxias Refinery (REDUC) was finalized and the plant became operational, after the
conclusion of the pre-operational phase. The complex has a nominal plant capacity of 540,000 tons
per year of polyethylene and 79,000 tons per year of propylene produced from ethane and propane
extracted from natural gas originated in the Campos Basin. Petroquisa holds a 16.7% interest of the
voting and preferred capital in Rio Polímeros. In addition to Petroquisa, the three other investors
are BNDESPAR and two leading private Brazilian petrochemical companies, Suzano and Unipar.
Our strategy in the petrochemicals field is to selectively expand our presence in the
petrochemicals market. According to our 2007-2011 Business Plan, we will invest approximately
U.S.$3.2 billion in capital expenditures in our Brazilian petrochemicals operations. This
investment will be aimed at increasing the production of several basic and intermediate
petrochemicals, such as ethylene, propylene, benzene, para-xylene, acrylic acid, purified
terephthalic acid (PTA) and styrenes, as well as plastic resins, including polyethylene,
polypropylene, PET and styrene. These projects will be carried out with other partners.
In addition, our petrochemicals project portfolio includes the construction of a petrochemical
complex named COMPERJ. This complex would integrate refinery units and petrochemical facilities to
produce petrochemical raw materials such as ethylene, propylene, aromatics and its petrochemical
derivatives, such as polyethylene and polypropylene, in order to supply the growing demand for such
products in the Brazilian market. We are currently developing the basic project for this
petrochemicals complex.
The plant, with an expected capacity to process 150 Mbpd of heavy oil, will produce, in
addition to several petrochemicals, some quantities of coke, diesel oil and naphtha. The conversion
of heavy oil in petrochemicals is
50
possible due to our innovative proprietary technology, named
Petrochemical FCC, developed by us in our R&D Center. The total estimated investment in this plant
is U.S.$8.3 billion. The COMPERJ is expected to begin operations in 2012.
On September 16, 2005, Petroquisa and Braskem incorporated Petroquímica Paulínia S.A.PPSA, a
joint venture between the two companies, contributing 40% and 60% of the entitys capital,
respectively. PPSAs purpose is to implement a polypropylene unit in Paulínia-SP and to use
polymer-grade propylene supplied by us as raw material for its operations, with capacity of 300
thousand tons per year and a global investment estimated at U.S.$328 million. The commercial
operations are projected to begin in the second quarter of 2008. To date, Petroquisa has invested
R$52 million in this project.
On November 28, 2005, Petroquisa, Mossi & Ghisolfi and Citene signed a Memorandum of
Understanding in which Mossi & Ghisolfi and Citene agreed to conduct a feasibility study relating
to the development of a Purified Terephthalic Acid Plant in Pernambuco. The study showed favorable
results. In March of 2006, Petroquisa and Citene signed a new memorandum regarding the creation of
a company to implement the project and Mossi & Ghisolfi withdrew from the project. Companhia
Petroquímica of Pernambuco-PETROQUÍMICASUAPE will manage the project. The plant will have a
production capacity of 640 thousand tons per year. We are projecting that an investment of U.S.$542
million through 2009 will be required for this project, an estimate of the start-up costs of the
plant through 2009.
Fertilizers
We continued to modernize our fertilizer production plants and develop new projects to
increase nitrogenate production and expand operations in this segment. In 2006, sales of ammonia
and urea generated a gross revenue of U.S.$350 million, a 6% increase as compared to 2005.
In 2006, we invested a total of R$92 million in our two fertilizer factories in Bahia and
Sergipe to improve their operational reliability, logistics, product quality and Health, Safety and
Environment (HSE). The construction of a new warehouse in Sergipe with a capacity of 30 thousand
tons of urea nearly doubled the units storage capacity and greatly increased its logistical
flexibility.
The factories in Bahia and Sergipe sold 213 thousand tons of ammonia in the domestic market in
2006, their fifth consecutive year of continuous growth. We also continued as the leader in the
domestic market for urea fertilizer, with sales of 710 thousand tons in 2006. The investments in
operational reliability at the Bahia plant led to the highest level of production of this plant
285 thousand tons in the last seven years.
In 2007, we expect to open a new urea granulation unit at the Sergipe factory with an expected
production capacity of 600 tons per day. In order to reduce and possibly eliminate our need to
import nitrogenated fertilizers, we are also planning the construction of a new industrial plant
UFN-3 that uses natural gas as raw material. The unit, which we estimate will cost approximately
U.S.$822 million, will have an estimated production capacity of 1 million tons of urea and 760
thousand tons of ammonia per year beginning in 2012.
Distribution
Summary and Strategy
Through Petrobras Distribuidora S.A., or BR, we distribute oil products, biodiesel and fuel
alcohol to retail, commercial and industrial customers throughout Brazil. Our operations are
supported by tankage capacity of approximately 2.3 million cubic meters, at 127 storage facilities
and 104 aviation product depots at airports throughout Brazil.
Our main strategies in distribution and marketing are to:
|
|
|
become the leader in the Brazilian market for petroleum derivatives and biofuels,
maximizing market share and profitability; |
51
|
|
|
position ourselves as the top brand in the eyes of customers by providing excellent
products and services; and |
|
|
|
|
coordinate our business in the energy sector with our other activities and
ultimately expand the market for derivatives and biofuels. |
As of 2005, Liquigás Distribuidora became the official name of our liquefied petroleum gas
(gás liquefeito de petróleo, or LPG) distribution company, previously called Agip do Brasil S.A.
and Sophia do Brasil S.A. Agip do Brasil S.A. was acquired in August 2004 to expand our share in
the LPG distribution sector and to consolidate our presence in the distribution market. By the end
of 2006, Liquigás Distribuidora held a 21.7% market share and ranked third in the LPG distribution
market based on sales volume according to Sindigás (Sindicato Nacional das Empresas Distribuidoras
de Gás Liqüefeito de Petróleo).
In 2006, we sold 607.8 million barrels of oil products to wholesale customers, with gasoline
and diesel fuel representing approximately 41.96% of these sales. Of our total sales in 2006, 171.1
million barrels of oil products were supplied to BR for retail marketing. The following table sets
forth our oil product sales to wholesale customers and retail distributors for each of 2006, 2005
and 2004:
OIL PRODUCT SALES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(MMbbl) |
Product |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diesel |
|
|
230.9 |
|
|
|
228.1 |
|
|
|
224.9 |
|
Gasoline |
|
|
120.0 |
|
|
|
114.3 |
|
|
|
104.8 |
|
Fuel oil |
|
|
94.3 |
|
|
|
77.2 |
|
|
|
106.1 |
|
Naphtha and jet fuel |
|
|
82.3 |
|
|
|
79.3 |
|
|
|
81.5 |
|
Others |
|
|
361.8 |
|
|
|
343.5 |
|
|
|
129.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
889.3 |
|
|
|
842.4 |
|
|
|
646.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesalers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diesel |
|
|
110.8 |
|
|
|
105.5 |
|
|
|
106.6 |
|
Gasoline |
|
|
46.5 |
|
|
|
43.0 |
|
|
|
42.9 |
|
Others |
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total wholesalers |
|
|
181.9 |
|
|
|
173.9 |
|
|
|
175.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail distributors |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BR |
|
|
159.5 |
|
|
|
157.8 |
|
|
|
145.1 |
|
Third parties |
|
|
547.9 |
|
|
|
510.7 |
|
|
|
326.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total retail distributors |
|
|
707.4 |
|
|
|
668.5 |
|
|
|
471.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total customers |
|
|
889.3 |
|
|
|
842.4 |
|
|
|
646.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail
As of December 31, 2006, our sales network in Brazil included 6,554 retail service stations
compared to 6,933 as of December 31, 2005, and comprised approximately 18% of the total number of
service stations in Brazil, all under the brand name BR. Over 65% of these BR stations are
located in the South and Southeast regions of Brazil, where over 57.2% of Brazils total population
of 188 million reside. Of these 6,554 service stations, 5,870 were active stations and BR owned
638. As required under Brazilian law, BR subcontracts the operation of all its service stations to
third parties. The other 5,232 service stations were owned and operated by dealers, who use the BR
brand name under license with BR facilities as their exclusive suppliers. BR provides technical
support, training and advertising for its network of service stations.
In 2006, 355 of our service stations also sold vehicular natural gas, compared to 295 in 2005
and 245 in 2004. The sales from these stations consisted of 19,246 million cubic feet (545 million
cubic meters) in 2006,
52
representing 23.7% of Brazilian market share, 17,198 million cubic feet (487
million cubic meters) in 2005, representing 25.1% of Brazilian market share and 15,008 million
cubic feet (425 million cubic meters) in 2004, representing 27% of Brazilian market share.
The introduction of biodiesel was one of the BRs accomplishments in 2006. Aligned to its
strategy of being consumers favorite brand and adding value to Petrobras, BR Distribuidora
delivered the product to 3,740 service stations and 2,380 major consumers across the country,
totaling 2,222,000 m3 of B2. In 2005, BR owned 2 service stations that sold biodiesel,
totaling 820 m3. Through June 2007, biodiesel is expected to be sold at all BR service
stations.
The table below sets forth market share (based on volume) for retail sales of different
products in Brazil for each of 2006, 2005 and 2004:
BR MARKET SHARE IN DISTRIBUTION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Fuel oil |
|
|
69.4 |
% |
|
|
64.8 |
% |
|
|
64.4 |
% |
Diesel |
|
|
31.6 |
% |
|
|
31.9 |
% |
|
|
28.6 |
% |
Gasoline |
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
|
22.1 |
% |
Fuel alcohol. |
|
|
34.0 |
% |
|
|
32.2 |
% |
|
|
31.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
33.6 |
% |
|
|
33.8 |
% |
|
|
31.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prices to retailers have generally tended to remain consistent between competing distributors,
particularly due to the low margin in the sector. Therefore, competition among distributors
continues to be primarily based on product quality, service and image.
During 2006, approximately 26.3% of the retail sales at service stations in Brazil were made
through BR-owned or franchised entities. We believe that our market share position has remained
strong over the past several years due to the strong brand name recognition of BR, the remodeling
of service stations and the addition of lubrication centers and convenience stores.
In 1996, BR created the De Olho no Combustível program (Eye on the Fuel program), which is
a certification program designed to ensure that the fuels sold to end consumers at service station
networks are identical in content to the fuels originating from our refineries. We have already
certified 4,778 service stations under this program.
The retail market for gasoline and diesel fuel in Brazil is highly competitive and we expect
that prices will be subject to continuing pressure. Accordingly, we intend to build upon the strong
brand image that we have established in Brazil to enhance profitability and customer loyalty.
We participate in the retail sector in Argentina, where we currently own 719 retail service
stations that operate under the brand names Petrobras (492 stations), Eg3 (190 stations) and San
Lorenzo (37 stations). We also have a participation in the retail sector in Bolivia, Colombia,
Paraguay and Uruguay, with 26, 47, 131 and 89 retail service stations, respectively.
Commercial and Industrial
We distribute oil products and bio-fuels to commercial and industrial customers through BR.
Our major customers are aviation, transportation, industrial and utility companies and government
entities, all of which generate relatively stable demand.
53
Set forth below are commercial and industrial sales statistics for each of 2006, 2005 and
2004:
COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL RETAIL SALES BY PRODUCT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(Mboe) |
Fuel oil |
|
|
24,195 |
|
|
|
22,850 |
|
|
|
24,649 |
|
Diesel |
|
|
77,409 |
|
|
|
78,241 |
|
|
|
70,521 |
|
Gasoline |
|
|
37,640 |
|
|
|
36,690 |
|
|
|
32,147 |
|
Jet fuels |
|
|
15,245 |
|
|
|
15,784 |
|
|
|
15,020 |
|
Fuel alcohol |
|
|
5,858 |
|
|
|
5,132 |
|
|
|
4,147 |
|
Lubricants |
|
|
1,498 |
|
|
|
1,601 |
|
|
|
1,460 |
|
Others |
|
|
26,605 |
|
|
|
24,943 |
|
|
|
22,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
188,450 |
|
|
|
185,241 |
|
|
|
170,554 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas, Power and Renewable Energy
Summary and Strategy
Our natural gas and power activities encompass the purchase, sale and transportation of
natural gas produced or imported into Brazil. In addition, this segment includes our domestic
electric energy generation and commercialization activities, as well as participation in domestic
natural gas transportation companies, state-owned and private natural gas distribution companies
and gas-fired power plants. We are also involved in the development of renewable energy,
alternative energy and energy efficiency projects with the objective of decreasing carbon emissions
resulting from our activities.
Natural gas demand has been growing sharply in the recent past, but decreased rates of growth
are expected in the near future due to limitations in supply. The Brazilian government estimated
that, in 2006, natural gas consumption represented 9.6% of primary energy use, as compared to 9.3%
in 2005 and 8.9% in 2004. We expect that number to be 11% by 2010. A significant portion of this
growth will come from industrial users, who, motivated by environmental concerns and fair prices
for natural gas, will replace fuel oil with natural gas. Power plant use and vehicular use are
also expected to grow. In 2006, industrial and vehicular consumption have grown 6.3% and 19.3%,
respectively.
Our main strategies in the natural gas and power segment are to:
|
|
|
Develop and consolidate the natural gas business in a profitable manner; |
|
|
|
|
Expand business in South America, especially related to the supply network for the
Brazilian market, in order to increase our share in the primary distribution markets; |
|
|
|
|
Structure our supply system to permit it to continue to be reliable, flexible, and
competitive; |
|
|
|
|
Develop and consolidate the energy business in a profitable manner, expanding our
share in generation and co-generation; |
|
|
|
|
Act in an effective way within the energy segment in order to make the hydrothermal
system more efficient and take advantage of business opportunities; |
|
|
|
|
Take advantage of synergies within the biofuel business so as to expand the market
for our products and services, continue leading the domestic production of biodiesel
and increase our share in the ethanol business; and |
|
|
|
|
Produce electricity using renewable sources, such as wind power, solar power,
small-scale hydropower and biomass (raw materials with biologic origin), and take
advantage of cooperation between our businesses and the businesses of our subsidiary,
BR. |
54
Our natural gas and power results are described in the Gas and Power segment of our audited
consolidated financial statements.
Natural Gas
Pipelines
In 1998, we developed and built the Bolivia-Brazil natural gas pipeline, which has a total
capacity of 1,060 MMscfd (30 MMcmd). The pipeline is 1,969 miles (3,150 kilometers) in length,
running from Rio Grande in Bolivia to Porto Alegre in Southern Brazil. The Bolivia-Brazil pipeline
connects to our domestic pipeline system that transports natural gas from the Campos and Santos
Basins. This pipeline was designed to supply gas to some of our power and petrochemical plants.
The Cabiúnas project comprises transportation and processing facilities of natural gas from
the offshore oil fields in the Campos Basin of the State of Rio de Janeiro. This project has been
operational since the second semester of 2005 and increased the transportation capacity from the
previous 290 million cubic feet (8.2 million cubic meters) per day to a total of 519 million cubic
feet (14.7 million cubic meters) per day of associated gas, while reducing the volumes of natural
gas currently flared on offshore platforms and alleviating existing constraints on oil
production from these platforms. In 2006, the average daily volume of natural gas flared on
the offshore platforms of the Campos Basin was 118 million cubic feet (3.338 million cubic meters).
We recently evaluated our natural gas production portfolio, studied other opportunities, and
decided to launch several natural gas production projects three years ahead of schedule using a new
approach to their implementation in Brazil. The analysis also led to the 2006 Gas Production
Acceleration Plan (PLANGÁS) involving E&P, Gas and Power and Supply, as well as Engineering, and
CENPES and Transpetro. The PLANGÁS aimed to increase our share in the domestic gas market and help
us meet growing demand for gas in the Southeastern Region of the country, thus reducing the
regions dependence on imported gas. Specifically, the PLANGÁS consists of interdependent
projects, including the increase in the gas production of the Campos, Espírito Santo and Santos
Basin, the processing and compressing capacity of the Cabiúnas Terminal and adjustments and
expansions to the Malha Sudeste and GASENE pipeline Projects, both in different stages of
development and in accordance with our 2007-2011 Business Plan. The GASENE Project involves the
construction of 1.4 thousand kilometers of pipelines with capacity of 20 million cubic meters per
day, connecting the Cabiúnas Terminal in Rio de Janeiro with the city of Catú in Bahia. The work
involves the Cabiúnas-Vitória Gas Pipeline (25% completed), the Vitória-Cacimbas Gas Pipeline (95%
completed), and the Cacimbas-Catú Gas Pipeline, where work shall begin in late 2007. Total
investment in the GASENE Project shall amount to approximately U.S.$2.2 billion. As of December
2006, R$1.205 billion had already been invested.
We are currently developing the Southeast and the Northeast Gas Pipeline Networks (Malha
Sudeste and Malha Nordeste). This project, known as the Malhas Project, will increase our
transportation capacity by expanding the existing natural gas infrastructure and delivering natural
gas to markets in the Northeast and Southeast regions of Brazil. During 2006, the natural gas
pipeline expansion projects of Northeastern Region (Malha NE) were modified due to changes in our
natural gas supply strategy. In the past, the Northeastern shortfall of natural gas was met by the
importing of Bolivian gas. It was therefore necessary to invest in the logistics of transporting
the gas to Pecém, in Ceará State. Due to the uncertainty of the Bolivian gas supply, Petrobras
decided to substitute part of the natural gas imported from Bolivia by LNG (Liquid Natural Gas)
imported from other regions, through the Pecém LNG Project.
As a result, the total extension of the natural gas pipelines was reduced by approximately 300
kilometers, in stretches in the northeastern region of Brazil. In the end, the extension was
approximately 622 miles (1,000 kilometers) long, which is expected to begin operations throughout
2006 and 2007, at a total cost of approximately U.S.$1.0 billion.
The Northern Region gas project consists of building a natural gas shipment system between our
production areas in Urucu and the city of Manaus, located in the northern state of Amazonas. This
venture consists of three pipelines: a) construction of the Urucu-Coari LPG pipeline (279 km long
and 10 inch nominal diameter), b) conversion of the existing pipeline between Urucu and Coari (18
inch nominal diameter), and the c) construction of
55
the Coari-Manaus gas pipeline (383 km long and
20 inch nominal diameter). A total of R$391 million was invested in 2006 to complete 32% of the
project.
Local Distribution Companies
We sell natural gas in Brazil to local gas distribution companies. Under Brazilian law, each
state has the monopoly over local distribution. Most states have established companies to act as
local gas distributors and we have minority interests in some of these companies. We appoint the
majority of the technical and commercial directors of all distribution companies in which we hold a
minority shareholding stake.
Currently we hold, through our subsidiary PETROBRAS Gás S.A. GASPETRO, 19 minority interests
in natural gas distribution companies in 19 states of Brazil. The majority of the companies have
started operations. GOIASGAS, a natural gas distribution company, joined the group of operating
companies in November 2006, when it started its operations with LNG, supplied by GAS LOCAL. GAS
LOCAL began its operations in August of 2006, selling LNG, as a joint venture with Praxair Inc.
However, four companies (CEBGÁS, RONGÁS, GASAP and GASMAR) have not yet started their operations.
Also, in the state of Espírito Santo, we have the exclusive rights to distribute natural gas
through our subsidiary BR.
In 2006, the gas distribution companies that are operating in which we have an interest
(ALGÁS, BAHIAGÁS, CEGÁS, CEG-RIO, COMPAGÁS, COPERGÁS, MSGÁS, GASPISA, PBGÁS, POTIGÁS, SCGÁS,
SERGÁS, SULGÁS, GOIASGAS and GASMIG) held total assets of R$2,411 million (U.S.$1,128 million)
compared with R$2,289 million (U.S.$978 million) in 2005. The assets are mainly an aggregate
pipeline extension of 2,654 miles (4,272 kilometers).
Also in 2006, the average volume of gas distribution, of the companies in which we have an
interest was 665,632 million cubic feet of natural gas per day, or 18,849 million cubic meters per
day, increasing by approximately 1.8% in the last year. The total net operational revenue in 2006
was R$3.939 billion (U.S.$1.842 billion) as compared to R$3.467 billion (U.S.$1.481 billion) in
2005.
The total net income of the companies in which we have an interest reached R$331.0 million
(U.S.$154.8 million) last year compared with R$299.0 million (U.S.$127.8 million) in 2005.
In 2006, investments in the companies in which we have an interest reached a total of R$269.6
million (U.S.$126.1 million) compared to R$290.8 million (U.S.$124.2 million) in 2005.
Some of the operating distribution companies in which we have an interest have entered into
long-term gas supply contracts with us under which such companies have purchase obligations (in
the case of contracts relating to Brazilian gas), and ship-or-pay and gas purchase obligations (in
the case of contracts relating to Bolivian gas or with gas-fired power producers).
The following table sets forth our domestic sales of natural gas to affiliated and
non-affiliated local distribution companies for each of 2006, 2005 and 2004:
DOMESTIC SALES OF NATURAL GAS TO LOCAL DISTRIBUTION COMPANIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(in MMscfd) |
Total sales annual average(i) |
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
|
1,289 |
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
Annual sales growth(i) |
|
|
5.2 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
(i) |
|
The volume of natural gas sold to local distribution companies (thermal and non-thermal).
Our internal consumption and natural gas received by internal transfer are not included. |
56
Commitments and Sales Contracts
Our investment in the Bolivia-Brazil gas pipeline in 1998 was the result of a 1996 gas supply
agreement, or the GSA, for the purchase of natural gas between the Bolivian state oil company,
Yacimientos Petrolíferos Fiscales Bolivianos YPFB, and us. The GSA requires us to purchase from
YPFB specified quantities of natural gas transported through the pipeline over a 20-year term.
Gas purchase commitments. Under our contracts with YPFB signed in 1998 for the purchase of
natural gas, we have agreed to purchase minimum volumes of natural gas from Bolivia at a formula
price that varies with the price of fuel oil. We have purchased and paid in 2006, 2005 and 2004,
approximately U.S.$1.3 billion, U.S.$799 million and U.S.$544 million, respectively. Such increase
resulted from higher prices (which reflected the international prices for fuel oil) and the
increase in the imported amounts: 24.44 MM m3/d in 2006, as opposed to 22.96 MM m3/d in 2005 and
19.94 MM m3/d in 2004. During 2002 and 2003 we purchased less than the minimum volumes set under
our agreement with YPFB, and therefore we paid a total amount of U.S.$81 million to satisfy our
purchase commitment. Set forth below are the minimum volumes we have agreed to under these
contracts, together with an estimate of the amounts we are obligated to pay for such minimum
volumes:
NATURAL GAS PURCHASE COMMITMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
Brent Crude Oil Projection (1) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Volume Obligation (Mmcmpd) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Volume Obligation (Mmcfd) |
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
|
|
850 |
|
Estimated Payments (U.S.$million)(2) |
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
758 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Corporate projections announced in June 2006 in the 2007-2011 Business Plan. |
|
(2) |
|
Amounts calculated based on current prices set forth under the agreements projected constant
to the future. Prices may be adjusted in the future and actual amounts may vary. Of these
amounts, 25.3% are related to Petrobras Bolivia. |
In connection with the long-term contract to buy gas (The Gas Supply Agreement or GSA)
to supply gas-fired power plants and for other uses in Brazil, the Company entered into a contract,
with a gas producer that constituted a derivative financial instrument under SFAS 133. This
contract, the Natural Gas Price Volatility Reduction Contract (the PVRC), was executed with the
purpose of reducing the effects of price volatility under the GSA. The terms of the PVRC include a
price collar for the period from October 2002 to December 2019, with us receiving cash payments
when the calculated price is above the established ceiling, and us making cash payments when the
price is below the established floor, with no cash payments being made when the price is between
the ceiling and the floor. As of December 31, 2005, we recorded a derivative asset based on the
fair value calculation amounting to U.S.$547 million and a liability of U.S.$144 million, which is
deemed a deferred purchase incentive. Due to the new Hydrocarbons Law of Bolivia (See Note 21 to
our audited consolidated financial statements), the other party involved in the PVRC contested the
contract, alleging among other, force majeure and excessive onus. On August 12, 2006, the parties
agreed to cancel the PVRC. As a result, on August 14, 2006, we received U.S.$41 million and
wrote-off accounts receivable related to the PVRC amounting to U.S.$77 million. We adjusted the
fair value asset and liabilities related to the PVRC by recording a financial expense of U.S.$328
million during the first quarter of 2006 as a result of the tax increases in Bolivia. In the
second quarter of 2006, we wrote-off the remaining fair value asset of U.S.$94 million as a
consequence of the contract cancellation.
Ship-or-pay commitments. In order to support the financing for the Bolivia-Brazil pipeline, we
also have entered into unconditional ship-or-pay purchase obligations for the transportation of
natural gas with Gás Transboliviano or GTB and Transportadora Brasileira Gasoduto Bolivia-Brasil or
TBG, the companies which own and operate the Bolivian and Brazilian portions of the pipeline,
respectively. TBGs portion of the pipeline financing is consolidated in our balance sheet. Our
volume obligations under the ship-or-pay arrangements are generally designed to meet the gas
purchase obligations with respect to our gas purchase contracts with YPFB. The total capacity of
1,060 MMscfd (30 MMcmd) also includes a transportation capacity option of 212 MMscfd (6 MMcmd),
valid for a 40-year term. This transportation capacity option was granted to us in consideration
for our agreed investment of approximately U.S.$379 million in the Bolivia-Brazil gas pipeline. The
total estimated project cost
57
was U.S.$1.9 billion. In 2006, 2005 and 2004, Petrobras made total
payments of approximately U.S.$483 million, U.S.$532 million and U.S.$348 million, respectively. Of
these amounts, approximately U.S.$424.8 million, U.S.$473.5 million and U.S.$302 million
corresponded, respectively, to payments made to TBG for the transportation of natural gas. Set
forth below are the minimum volumes we have agreed to under the ship-or-pay arrangements, together
with an estimate (assuming certain changes in the U.S. Consumer Price Index (CPI)) of the amounts
we are obligated to pay for such minimum volumes:
NATURAL GAS SHIP-OR-PAY COMMITMENTS (TBG)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
Volume Commitment (MMcmpd) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Volume Commitment (MMcfpd) |
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
Estimated Payments (U.S.$million) |
|
|
393.80 |
|
|
|
393.57 |
|
|
|
398.21 |
|
|
|
401.96 |
|
|
|
404.11 |
|
NATURAL GAS SHIP-OR-PAY COMMITMENTS (GTB)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
Volume Commitment (MMcmpd) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Volume Commitment (MMcfpd) |
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
|
|
1,059 |
|
Estimated Payments (U.S.$million) |
|
|
58.49 |
|
|
|
58.79 |
|
|
|
59.08 |
|
|
|
59.37 |
|
|
|
59.67 |
|
Natural gas sales contracts. In light of these gas purchase and ship-or-pay obligations, we
have entered into or negotiated firm gas sale and ship-or-pay sale arrangements to sell natural gas
to local gas distribution companies and gas-fired power plants, most of which we operate and in
which we own a minority interest.
The arrangements with the gas-fired power plants are made through contracts with the local
distribution companies, which in turn enter into back-to-back arrangements with the gas-fired power
plants, and a portion of the gas buyers payments is usually guaranteed to us by the parent
companies of the gas-fired power companies or through financial guarantees. Our total sales of
natural gas, which includes sales to gas-fired power companies, for 2006, 2005 and 2004, were
approximately U.S.$2,879 million, U.S.$2,398 million and U.S.$1,876 million, respectively. The
table below sets forth the commitments by local gas distribution companies and by gas-fired power
plants for the purchase of volumes of natural gas from us beginning in 2007, together with an
estimate of the amounts obligated to be paid for such volumes, including volumes in firm contracts,
contracts in renegotiation, and new firm-flexible contracts under negotiation:
NATURAL GAS SALES CONTRACTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
|
(in MMscfd) |
To Local Gas Distribution |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties(1) |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
Third parties |
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
To Power Generation Plants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties(1) |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
Third parties |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
|
|
259 |
|
Total |
|
|
1,351 |
|
|
|
1,359 |
|
|
|
1,552 |
|
|
|
1,560 |
|
|
|
1,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Contract Revenues (U.S.$million)(2)(3) |
|
$ |
2,416 |
|
|
$ |
2,663 |
|
|
$ |
3,224 |
|
|
$ |
3,153 |
|
|
$ |
3,093 |
|
58
|
|
|
(1) |
|
For purposes of this table, related parties include all local gas distribution companies
and power generation plants in which we have an equity interest and third parties refer to
those in which we do not have an equity interest. |
|
(2) |
|
Figures show revenues net of taxes. Estimates are based on sales (outside sales) and do not
include internal consumption or transfers. Estimated volumes are based on take or pay
agreements in our contracts, expected volumes, and contracts under negotiation, not maximum
sales. |
|
(3) |
|
Prices may be adjusted in the future and actual amounts may vary. |
Pricing. On June 1, 2001, the Brazilian government instituted a mechanism which allows a
U.S. dollar-indexed component of the natural gas pricing mechanism to be passed through to
gas-fired power plants for a period of 12 years, pursuant to Portaria No. 176 (a joint regulatory
act issued by the Ministry of Mines and Energy and the Ministry of Finance), which was updated by
Portaria No. 234 issued on July 22, 2002. See Regulations of the Oil and Gas Industry in
BrazilPrice RegulationNatural Gas. This mechanism has enabled us to sell natural gas to a number
of gas-fired power plants that were unwilling to purchase natural gas under the prior gas price
regulation because it requires the buyer to take the intra-year exchange rate risk. Under the new
formula, exchange rate variations are reflected in gas prices annually, while we will be
remunerated at market based interest rates for any resulting delay in gas price adjustments.
Power
Brazil currently has an installed electricity generation capacity of approximately 96,623 MW.
More than 96% of this capacity is interconnected to form one single integrated system, with
approximately 90% of the electricity supplied to that system coming from hydroelectric sources. As
a result of the significant growth in electricity demand, combined with the limited investment in
the sector during the last two decades and a high dependency on hydroelectric power (and
consequently susceptibility to a prolonged drought), we believe substantial additional generation
capacity needs to be developed in Brazil.
New Regulatory Model
A New Regulatory Model for the Brazilian Electric Power Sector (Novo Modelo Regulatório do
Setor Elétrico Brasileiro), Law No. 10,336, was introduced on March 16, 2004, with the enactment of
the New Industry Model Law. Under the new model, assured energy availability may be sold under
regulated contracts to public utility companies, as these companies are legally bound to acquire
energy as cheaply as possible through auctions or free contracts. Energy availability sold under
regulated contracts must be acquired by means of public auctions and energy availability sold under
the free market is negotiated freely through bilateral contracts. The new regulatory model also
creates incentives for investments in power generation from alternative sources.
The first auction for power plants built recently or under development was held in December of
2005. We participated in the auction and sold 1,391 MW of energy from our gas-fired power plants
with the intention of securing long-term contracts. The contracts represented 42% of the energy
sold in the auction.
Of the 1,104 MW sold in the October 2006 auction, 48.5% (535 MW) were from gas-fired power
plants. Our sales totaled 205 MW, 18.6% of the energy sold in the auction.
Status of Investments
We believe that our participation in the construction and development of gas-fired power
plants has strategic benefits for our business because:
|
|
|
our participation in the power sector helps create a market for natural gas made
available through our investments in the natural gas business; |
|
|
|
|
we are able to build inside the fence co-generation plants close to our refineries
and other facilities, which provide us with a reliable and inexpensive source of
electricity for use in our own refineries; and |
|
|
|
|
these co-generation plants also produce steam for use by our refineries and in
onshore crude oil recovery enhancement projects. For example, the gas-fired power
plant, Termoaçu, which is currently |
59
|
|
|
under construction, will generate steam for the
Exploration and Production Unit of Rio Grande do Norte and Ceará. The production and
consumption of steam reduces the overall costs of generating electricity, making such
electricity cost competitive relative to other gas-fired power generation, including
new hydroelectric developments. |
In addition, we concluded a program for the acquisition of three gas-fired power plants
(Eletrobolt, TermoCeará and Macae Merchant), in order to mitigate the losses resulting from
contractual obligations previously suffered.
The main purpose of these acquisitions is to reduce our financial exposure in connection with
these merchant gas-fired power plants. See Financial Exposure.
Financial Exposure
To encourage the development of some of the gas-fired power plants in which we participate
with an equity interest, or to which we sell our natural gas, we have entered into agreements to
provide economic support to such gas-fired power plants. Our obligations under these agreements
were structured as tolling arrangements whereby we
agree to provide each of the inputs to produce electricity and operate the plant, as well as
off-take the electricity, remunerating the gas-fired power plant at a price that will service
capital (equity and debt).
We have only entered into tolling arrangements with gas-fired power plants in which we have an
equity interest. Our power commitments under the tolling agreements are as follows:
POWER OFFTAKE PROJECTED COMMITMENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PLANT |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
|
(Average MW) |
FAFEN |
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
TermoBahia |
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
Total NE Tolling Arrangements |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
324 |
|
Ibiritermo |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
Total S/SE Tolling Arrangements |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
In 2007, total generating capacity in respect of which we have tolling commitments, based upon
commitments of projects under construction or in operation, is 550 MW.
We expect that the electricity we purchase under the tolling agreements will be partly used
for demand in our facilities, estimated to be 282 MW in 2007, 296 MW in 2008, and 310 MW in 2009,
allocated between the Northeast and South/Southeast regions of Brazil. UTE FAFEN has a power
purchase agreement for the sale of electric power to third parties (distributors /concessionaires).
By the end of the fourth quarter of 2005, we sold energy availability in auctions coordinated by
the MME, by means of energy agreements of 15 years, starting as of 2008, with increasing volumes,
reaching 1391 MW in 2010. Our commercial strategy is to continue the sale of our remaining capacity
in public auctions to distributors and the sale to large consumers through power purchase
agreements.
On December 28, 2006, we reached an agreement with Companhia Paranaense de Energia (COPEL) to
lease the Araucária gas-fired power plant, a plant in the Curitiba Metropolitan Region with 484.5
megawatts of capacity. Our lease agreement with UEG Araucária is effective until December 31,
2007, and may be extended for a period of up to 12 months. We also leased the Bahia I gas-fired
power plant on December 28, 2006, a plant with 31.6 megawatts of capacity.
On April 27, 2007, Petrobras signed a contract with Empresa Metropolitana de Águas e Energia
SA (EMAE) to lease the Piratininga oil-fired power plant, located in the metropolitan region of São
Paulo, the largest energy market in Brazil. Petrobras operates a gas-fired power plant on the same
site, Usina Fernando Gasparian. The operation of the gas-fired power plant together with part of
the Piratinga oil-fired power plant will allow for 540 megawatts of capacity. In addition, it will
be possible to reach a capacity of 200 megawatts from the oil-fired power
60
plant. This arrangement
provides greater operational flexibility and increases the total amount of energy that we can
supply. The lease is effective until 2024.
Renewable Energy Alternative
Our strategy in energy development is based on renewable energy, energy efficiency and the
potential gains in carbon credits due to the prevented emissions promoted by these activities.
Renewable Energy
We aim to become the leader in national biodiesel production and expand our participation in
the ethanol business. In order to achieve these objectives, we have developed and intend to invest
U.S.$700 million in various initiatives relating to renewable energy sources, as described in our
2007-2011 Business Plan.
We already have one wind power plant with a 1.8 MW capacity in Macau RN, northeast of the
country. At first, we intend to use the produced energy for internal consumption. Other projects
for wind power plants and small hydropower plants are under study. These projects will expand our
use of renewable energy. Our Business
Plan in 2006 projected production at 855 million liters (225.87 million gallons) of biodiesel
by 2011, as well as export 3.5 billion liters (924.6 million gallons) of ethanol and generate 240
MW of electricity through a renewable source of energy.
Biodiesel
Brazil is an important player in the international biofuels market and has a highly favorable
climate and soil for the growing biomass, especially for the oleaginous seed crops.
With this growth and in accordance with our strategy of becoming the national leader in the
biodiesel industry as an integrated power company, we began the construction of 3 processing plants
in 2006. The facilities in Candeias (BA), Montes Claros (MG) and Quixadá (CE), will produce
approximately 57 million liters of biodiesel per year and will start operations by the end of 2007.
As of January 2008, the addition of biodiesel to diesel oil will be mandatory, in the
proportion of 2%. For the acquisition of raw materials soy, cotton, castor oil and palm oil
and an oleaginous seed called pinhão manso in addition to animal fat, we have entered into
partnerships with small agricultural businesses, taking advantage of the tax incentives granted to
biodiesel producers that generate work and income for family-run agriculture businesses.
Biodiesel decreases the emission of gases that create the greenhouse effect, due to its
vegetable origin, sulphur and particulate matter, optimizing the performance of engines. Besides
the environmental and social advantages, according to the increase in the use of renewable sources
of energy, our product will accelerate the end of the necessity of importing diesel fuel.
Sustainable Development
Our actions relating to the sustainable development of power in 2006 aimed to evaluate the
implementation of projects to avoid emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG), throughout the entire
Petrobras system to obtain Certified Emission Reductions (CER) according to the Clean Development
Mechanism (CDM) and rules of the Kyoto Protocol, as well as to propose sales policies regarding
these CERs. We have studied the technical viability and baseline methodologies in order to obtain
approval and registration of those projects with the Executive Board of the CDM. We registered the
first Petrobras CDM Project in March of 2007. This project represents the use of wind power as a
substitute for the generation of power with fossil fuels in the platforms of Aratum, in Rio Grande
do Norte. Other projects underway, mainly linked to the downstream area, are aimed at elaborating
the CDM Project Design Document, a template on which a company describes its calculations for
reduced emissions in accordance with the Kyoto Protocol. They include the generation of power in
turbo expanders in several refineries, reduction of N2O in the fertilizer production
area, and the use of heat from gases emitted, among others.
61
Energy Efficiency
The consolidation of our energy consumption and the enhancement of energy efficiency in our
units are the main activities of the Internal Energy Conservation Program.
In 2006, there was a relative reduction in the burning of fossil fuels, saving approximately
1.084 barrels of equivalent oil per day; a volume that resulted in savings of approximately U.S.$20
million and that avoided emissions of approximately 171 thousand tons of CO2 in 2006.
In addition, the Programa Nacional de Racionalização do Uso dos Derivados (the National Oil
and Natural Gas Derivates Rationalization Program, or CONPET), a governmental program involved in
environmental matters and coordinated by us, facilitated the prevention of about 818 thousand ton
of CO2 emissions into atmosphere in 2006, saving approximately 305 million liters of oil
diesel and increasing motor efficiency by 7%.
International
Summary and Strategy
In 2006, approximately 6.8% of our net revenues were generated outside Brazil. We seek to
evolve from an integrated oil and gas company in Brazil to a leading energy company in Latin
America and a strong international player.
Currently, we plan to focus our non-Brazilian exploration, development and production
activities regionally, in areas where we can successfully exploit our competitive advantages, such
as deepwater technology. We particularly intend to drill off the west coast of Africa and the Gulf
of Mexico and onshore in South America. We recently acquired rights to participate in four
exploration blocks offshore Angola. We are also expanding our interests in South America in the
downstream segment. During 2006, the following new assets were bought: one lubricant plant, service
stations and convenience stores in Colombia; service stations, oil products distribution facilities
(asphalt, lubes and aviation products), and one LPG distribution facility in Paraguay; and service
stations, oil products distribution facilities (asphalt, lubes, marine and aviation products), and
one natural gas distribution company in Uruguay.
We have budgeted U.S.$12.1 billion in capital expenditures for the period from 2007 to 2011
for international investments.
Our main strategies in the international segment are to:
|
|
|
Assure our leadership as an integrated energy company in Latin America; |
|
|
|
|
Expand our exploration and production activities in the Gulf of Mexico and Africa; |
|
|
|
|
Expand our operations in new exploration and production in areas where we may have
competitive advantages; |
|
|
|
|
Expand downstream activities in profitable markets with a high potential for growth; |
|
|
|
|
Add value to our production of heavy crude; |
|
|
|
|
Incorporate natural gas reserves and operate in the LNG market; and |
|
|
|
|
Internationalize and add value to our brand. |
Our international results are reflected in the International segment in our audited
consolidated financial statements.
62
Exploration and Production
During 2006, we conducted exploration activities outside Brazil: in Argentina, Bolivia,
Colombia, Ecuador, Nigeria, Peru, the United States and Venezuela. In addition, we are currently
performing studies to evaluate blocks where we hold interests in Angola, Argentina, Colombia,
Mexico, Nigeria, the United States, Iran, Equatorial Guinea, Tanzania, Turkey, Libya, Mozambique
and Venezuela. Production activities were conducted in Angola, Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia,
Ecuador, Mexico, Peru, the United States, and Venezuela. Collectively, these activities represented
23.9% of our total capital expenditures for crude oil and natural gas exploration and production.
Our capital expenditures for international exploration and production were U.S.$2,304 million for
2006, U.S.$1,067 million for 2005 and U.S.$666 million for 2004. The following table provides
information about the allocation of such expenditures for each of 2006, 2005 and 2004:
DISTRIBUTION OF CAPITAL EXPENDITURES IN INTERNATIONAL EXPLORATION ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Argentina |
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
Bolivia |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
Colombia |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
Peru, Ecuador and Venezuela |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
South America |
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
West Coast of Africa |
|
|
43.7 |
|
|
|
47.8 |
|
|
|
52.0 |
|
Gulf of Mexico |
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
33.9 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
Others |
|
|
13.1 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Development
Over the past three years, we have participated in the development of a number of fields
internationally. These include: five in Colombia (Guando, Rio Ceibas, Yaguara, Santiago and
Espinal), three in the United States (GB 200, North Coulomb and Cottonwood), one in Angola (Block
2), two in Nigeria (Akpo and Agbami), many fields in Argentina concentrated in the Neuquen and
Austral basins (most importantly in Medanito, Puesto Hernandez, Rio Néuquen, Santa Cruz I and Santa
Cruz II), four in Bolivia (San Alberto, San Antonio, Colpa Caranda and Monteagudo), one in Ecuador
(Block 18), one in Peru (Lote X) and four in Venezuela (Ortiupano-Leona, Mata, Acema and La
Concepción). In 2006, our net production outside Brazil averaged 142.2 thousand barrels per day of
crude oil and NGLs and 101.1 thousand barrels of oil equivalent of natural gas per day at an
average lifting cost of U.S.$3.36 per barrel. The following table provides information on the
allocation of our international development activities for each of 2006, 2005 and 2004.
ALLOCATION OF CAPITAL EXPENDITURES IN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Argentina |
|
|
26.5 |
% |
|
|
36.2 |
% |
|
|
41.9 |
% |
Peru |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
Ecuador |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
16.7 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
Bolivia |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Colombia |
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
|
Venezuela |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
28.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South America |
|
|
41.8 |
|
|
|
83.4 |
|
|
|
96.9 |
|
West Coast of Africa |
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Gulf of Mexico |
|
|
17.2 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
Argentine Activities
We operate in Argentina mainly through our subsidiary PESA Petrobras Energía S.A. (ADR:
PZE), in which we have a 67.2% interest.
As of December 31, 2006, our combined crude oil and natural gas proved reserves in Argentina
were approximately 311 million barrels of oil equivalent, approximately 60.5% of which were proved
developed reserves and approximately 39.5% of which were proved undeveloped reserves.
PESAs production in Argentina is concentrated in the Neuquén and Austral Basins. PESA holds
670 thousand net acres under production concessions in the Neuquén Basin and 2.456 thousand net
acres under production concessions in the Austral Basin. Our gross production acreage in Argentina
amounted to 4,807 thousand acres (3,233 thousand net). For the year ended December 31, 2006,
combined crude oil and natural gas production in Argentina averaged 107.9 thousand barrels of oil
equivalent per day.
In the downstream segment we have refining capacity of 81 thousand barrels per day,
distributed in two refineries operating with a throughput rate of 78%. We also have a 28.5%
interest in Refinería Del Norte which we operate. We also participate in the retail sector in
Argentina, where we currently own 719 retail service stations that operate under the brand names
Petrobras (492 stations), Eg3 (190 stations) and San Lorenzo (37 stations).
We also participate, through PESA, in petrochemical businesses, in which we have three plants,
Puerto General San Martin, Zarate and Campana in Argentina, where we also have a 40% participation
in Petroquímica Cuyo. PESA also owns a petrochemical integrated complex for the production of
ethylbenzene, styrene, and polystyrene plant in Brazil, INNOVA, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PESA.
Project MEGA
We own a 34% participation in Compañia MEGA S.A. (representing a total investment of U.S.$80.3
million), a joint venture with Repsol-YPF and Dow Chemical to fractionate natural gas liquids. The
company consists of a natural gas processing plant in Loma La Lata (Province of Neuquén), a 600 km
long pipeline, a separation plant, port, storage and effluent treatment facilities in Bahía Blanca
(Province of Buenos Aires). We are obligated under an off-take contract to take minimum volumes of
LPG and natural gasoline, if delivered, at market prices.
Other interests of PESA
In the gas and power sector, we participate, through PESA, as a co-controlling shareholder in
TGS, which owns approximately a 7,500 km extension pipeline with current firm contracted transport
capacity of 71.6 MMcmd and a gas processing plant located in Bahía Blanca, with a processing
capacity of 43 MMcmd.
Regarding our electricity assets in Argentina, we cover the entire production chain,
accounting for 6.5% of the countrys electricity generation through ownership interests in two
generation plants, Pichi Picún Leufú (hydroelectric generation) and Genelba (gas-fired power
generation). We also have an indirect interest in Transener, Argentinas largest transmission
company and owner of 95% of Argentinas high-tension network. In June 2006, PESAs Board of
Directors accepted the terms of the binding offer submitted by Eton Park Capital Management for the
acquisition of our 50% equity interest in Citelec and, as part of this offer, our 22.22% interest
in Yacylec. In August 2006, Petrobras Energía entered into a stock purchase agreement with EP
Primrose Spain S.L. (a company controlled by Eton Park Capital Management) with respect to Eton
Parks offer. Under the terms of the stock purchase agreement and the terms of Petrobras Energías
divestment commitment, the consummation of the transaction with Eton Park was subject to the
approval by the pertinent regulatory agencies and authorities. On February 9, 2007, the Argentine
Antitrust Commission issued a resolution rejecting the sale of Citelec shares to Eton Park Capital
Management. In March 2007, Petrobras Energía received an offer from Energía Argentina S.A. (Enarsa)
and Electroingeniería S.A. for the purchase of its shares in Citelec and Yacylec, proposing legal,
economic and financial conditions identical to those previously agreed with Eton Park Capital
Management. As a result of this offer, a letter of agreement was executed subject to approval by
the Board of Directors of Petrobras Energía, Enarsa and Electroingeniería. The letter of agreement
provides that the offer will be accepted if the rejection of EP Primrose Spain S.L.s proposed
transaction becomes final through administrative or legal proceedings or if the agreement
64
entered
into with EP Primrose Spain S.L. were terminated for failure to obtain all required governmental
authorizations. We also maintain an important presence in the central area of Buenos Aires, an
area with more than 2.1 million customers, through Edesur, Argentinas largest energy distribution
company by volume.
Bolivian Activities
As of December 31, 2006, our combined crude oil and natural gas proved reserves in Bolivia
were approximately 214.7 million barrels of oil equivalent, approximately 96.8% of which were
proved developed reserves. We drilled one exploration well in Bolivia in 2006, but we found that it
was not commercially feasible. In 2006, we also started drilling a development well in the Sábalo
Field, located in the San Antonio block. This operation will continue in 2007. For the year ended
December 31, 2006, our combined crude oil and natural gas production in Bolivia averaged 57.0
thousand barrels of oil equivalent per day.
On May 1, 2006, the Bolivian government established by decree that the state-owned YPFB will
become a partner in every asset belonging to the oil and gas sector.
With respect to our operations in Exploration and Production, we have a 35% interest in the
San Alberto and San Antonio Fields (the other partners are Empresa Petrolera Andina (50%) and Total
Bolivia (15%)). During the transition period, we were involved in intense negotiations with YPFB
and the Bolivian government, resulting in the signing of new operational contracts with YPFB in
October 2006. These new operational contracts provide that (i) all hydrocarbon resources are
property of YPFB, (ii) we maintain our status as operator of the oil and gas fields but sales must
be made through YPFB, and (iii) we have the right to recover our costs and participate in the
profits generated by the production. The contracts became effective in May 2007.
In terms of our two refineries, the decree established the transfer of 50% plus 1 share to
YPFB and the remaining 49.9% to be retained by us. However, in May 2007, after intense negotiations
with the Bolivian government, we reached an agreement with YPFB, in which we will receive U.S.$112
million for all of our shares of PBR. A transition period of two months has been defined in which
the transfer of the operations and the shares have to take place as well as the payment, which is
set to be made in two parts.
Since the nationalization measures were first announced by the Bolivian government, we and the
Bolivian government have had disagreements in connection with the terms of the GSA. The Bolivian
government attempted to increase the gas prices under the agreement but currently has agreed to
maintain the prices at the levels originally provided for in the agreement, except for a premium
for those volumes with calorific power higher than 8,900 kcal/m3, for which a new price formula
has, based on international market prices, yet to be negotiated.
YPFB also became the sole distributor of refined oil and gas products in Bolivia, and we
ceased our activities in this area. We continue to own Petrobras Bolívia Distribución, or PDB, a
company with a former network of 104 service stations, but which currently retains ownership of
only 26 of these stations.
For further information on our Bolivian activities, see Item 3. Key InformationRisk
FactorsRisks Relating to Our Operations¾ The recent nationalization measures taken by the
Bolivian and Venezuelan governments may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and
financial condition.
Venezuelan Activities
In March 2006, Petrobras Energía S.A. (PESA), Petróleos de Venezuela S.A. (PDVSA), and
Corporación Venezolana del Petróleo S.A. (CVP) entered into several Memoranda of Understanding in
order to migrate the Operating Services Agreements to majority state-owned companies (empresas
mistas, or mixed companies), which had the effect of limiting private participation in the oil
business in Venezuela. The economic effects of the migration came into force starting April 1,
2006.
As of December 31, 2006, estimated proved oil and gas reserves attributable to PESAs
operations in Venezuela amounted to 78.6 million barrels of oil equivalent, accounting for 14.1% of
PESAs total reserves. Estimated proved oil and gas reserves attributable to the companys
operations in Venezuela are calculated on the basis of the contractual structure in force as of
such date. In 2006, we drilled one dry hole exploration well in Venezuela.
65
In March 2006, PESA entered into several Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) in order to migrate
the Operating Services Agreements of the Oritupano Leona, La Concepción, Acema and Mata Areas, to
majority state-owned companies (mixed companies). As a consequence of the migration process,
PESAs role of operator was changed to that of a minority shareholder of the mixed companies. The
new operator is the mixed company itself. Pursuant to the abovementioned MOUs, interest of private
investors in the mixed companies was limited to 40%, with the Venezuelan Government holding a 60%
interest. PESAs direct and indirect interest in the Oritupano-Leona, La Concepción, Acema and Mata
areas was set at 22%, 36%, 34.5% and 34.5%, respectively. Before April 1, 2006, PESAs indirect
interest in the Oritupano-Leona, La Concepción, Acema and Mata areas was 55%, 90%, 86.2% and 86.2%,
respectively.
The MOUs established that CVP will recognize a divisible and transferable credit in favor of
the private companies that will compose the partially state-owned companies. PESA was awarded a
credit in the amount of U.S.$88.5 million. This credit can be assigned but it will not bear
interest and may only be used for future investments in oil and gas exploration, development or
production activities in Venezuela.
Compliance with the terms of the MOUs was subject to approval by the relevant authorities,
including the National Assembly, as specified below, and PESAs Board of Directors.
The organization of the majority state-owned companies and the terms and conditions governing
the performance of primary activities thereby, were indeed approved by the Venezuelan Ministry of
Energy and Petroleum and the Venezuelan National Assembly, as well as by PESAs Board of Directors.
Other Activities and relevant facts regarding our operations in Venezuela
In February 2005, as part of the cooperation strategy between Brazil and Venezuela, the two
countries signed 14 Memoranda of Understanding (MOUs) designed to develop a series of initiatives
and projects to increase assistance and collaboration in the oil and gas sector.
We and PDVSA are the main players in these agreements. To carry out these efforts, we
incorporated a separate entity, independent from PESA, called Petrobras Venezuela Inversiones y
Servicios S.A. (PEVIS). PEVIS will be entitled to develop all the initiatives, projects and
studies supported by the cooperation agreements signed between Brazil and Venezuela, and in
addition, PEVIS will serve as a service unit, providing technical expertise and personnel to
support projects and/or units where we require this support. PEVIS will also be in charge of
finding and developing possible business enterprises located in the local area, in the north of
South America and in the Caribbean.
By mid July 2006, PEVIS was formally incorporated and began the process of hiring personnel,
mainly from PESA Venezuela. See Item 3. Key InformationRisk FactorsRisks Relating to Our
Operations The recent nationalization measures taken by the Bolivian and Venezuelan governments
may have an adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition for a description
of the risks associated with these measures.
During 2006, the Venezuelan projects included:
Carabobo 1
This block is part of the strategy that the Venezuelan government has developed for the
exploitation of the vast reserves of extra heavy oil in the Orinoco Belt in the southern part of
the country. In this case, the field development is, in principle, tied to a vertically integrated
business model that includes the construction of an enhancer complex to produce synthetic crude
with better quality as it comes from the extra heavy crude oil, and also the construction of a
refinery in the northeast of Brazil (Pernambuco state) to which part of the production from the
enhancer complex will be allocated.
During 2006, we, through PEVIS, worked with this model through its different stages. Relating
to production, during the second semester of the year, a technical team worked on the reserve
estimate and the certification of the Carabobo 1 block. This process officially concluded in
December 2006 with a reserve certification by a third party. In 2007, a joint technical group of
PDVSAs and our engineers began work on a preliminary development plan for the upstream portion of
the integrated project. This group has reviewed numerous
66
aspects related to wellbore
characteristics and drilling, geology and petrophysics, production strategy, facilities, operation
and maintenance and a basic layout and distribution of all facilities planned for the field
including delivery and points for the fluids. All this work is considered to be preliminary as the
definition of the specific area and its limits to be assigned to the mixed company is yet to be
determined by the Ministry of Energy and Petroleum (MENPET).
The analysis of the enhancer complex is on hold until PDVSA presents the results of a
conceptual visualization study performed by a Canadian consortium.
The basic engineering of the Pernambuco Refinery was conducted in Brazil. The proposed
refinery will be built in the city of Suape, and PDVSA will have a 40% share, that is similar to
the share that we will have in the Carabobo field. Construction is expected to start in the second
semester of 2007.
Currently, PDVSA and the MENPET are in the process of discussing legal details of the
Carabobo 1 area and the contracts for this area and for the Pernambuco Refinery
Mariscal Sucre
The studies to develop four offshore gas fields (Río Caribe, Mejillones, Patao and Dragón) in
the northeastern part of Venezuela, in association with PDVSA, were conducted in Brazil. The
studies were performed during 2006, and focused on upstream activities. The mid and downstream
stages of the project are still in their conceptual stages, with PDVSA responsible for these
studies. Although this project is now being carried out in Brazil, PEVIS personnel have been
serving as the liaison between Venezuelan and Brazilian officials in order to facilitate this
initiative.
Mature Fields
As part of the new business model implemented by PDVSA, the exploitation of developed fields
(blocks that have been in operation for several years and in some cases abandoned due to their
declining production rate with traditional methods) through incorporated joint ventures (mixed
companies) with foreign companies will be projected for several assets in 2007 and 2008.
Due to its geographic location and to particular characteristics that in some ways resemble
the fields that PESA operated for ten or more years, PDVSA offered us five fields from its
portfolio to be operated by a mixed company between both PDVSA and us.
We and PDVSA studied the fields of Lido, Limon, Nieblas, Adas and La Paz during 2006 in order
to create a development strategy for the mixed company. A final project was submitted to our Board
of Directors in March 2007. At this point PEVIS was authorized to proceed with the negotiations
with PDVSA and MENPET in order to create a mixed company to operate these fields. After our
proposal, PDVSA required the payment of an entry bonus, a type of downpayment used in the bid, in
order to authorize the creation of the mixed company. The negotiations regarding the amount of this
bonus are still in progress and results are expected during the second semester of 2007.
Project PT Moruy
This project is being developed through an incorporated joint venture with Teikoku (PT MORUY
II, S.A.), giving equal shares to each company, to explore one offshore block in the Venezuelan
Gulf called Moruy II, for the production of non-associated gas. The rights to explore and develop
this block were obtained in an open bid organized by MENPET in November 2005. In February 2006, a
Gas License was granted to PT MORUY II, S.A. and all the studies officially started.
The license, under the Venezuelan law for gaseous hydrocarbons, entitles the licensee to
explore and develop the area if commercial resources of free gas are found. The joint venture has a
firm commitment to perform a seismic survey in the area and the drilling of one exploratory well
over a period of 30 months.
67
During 2006, several studies were performed to design the required seismic survey and the
process for implementing the survey, which were finished in the third quarter of 2006. In January
2007, the vessel to perform seismic studies arrived in the Moruy II block, and all the necessary
permits and licenses were obtained.
The 3D seismic acquisition was performed between January and March 2007, completing the entire
scope of the study in accordance with the budget and time allotted, with the required quality and
without any environmental incident or any issue raised by the surrounding communities. Currently
the interpretation of the seismic data, development of technical studies associated with
environmental licenses, and the planning of all the activities related to the drilling of the
exploratory well are being conducted as planned.
Other relevant facts during 2007
As an extension of all the activities and milestones accomplished in 2006, in 2007 PEVIS has
taken a series of actions to move forward into the development of its projects in Venezuela and
also in allocating technical
personnel to some of our localities in order to accommodate the human resources demand from
several of the corporate ventures in Brazil and abroad.
Ecuadorian Activities
In Ecuador, our subsidiary, Petrobras Energía, or PESA, operates Blocks 18 and 31. As of
December 31, 2006, we had interests, through PESA, of 30% and 60% in Blocks 18 and 31,
respectively.
Block 18 is located in the Oriente basin of Ecuador, having a significant potential of 28º to
33° API light crude oil reserves. The concession for production activities in Block 18 is for an
initial 20-year term from October 2002. Once this term expires, Ecuadorian hydrocarbon laws
provides for the possibility of an additional five-year extension period.
Block 18 has 25 productive wells, of which 3 are located at the Pata field and 22 are located
at the Palo Azul field. No exploration wells were drilled in Ecuador during 2006. In 2006 drilling
of 8 productive wells resulted in a significant increase in production. The oil treatment plant and
ducts became operational in December 2006 and currently allow the treatment of 40,000 barrels of
dry oil per day and increase gross production that had been limited by the former production
facilities.
Block 31 is located in a highly sensitive ecological area of the Amazon jungle in the central
part of the eastern border of the upper Amazon basin and covers an area of 494 thousand net acres.
Pursuant to the blocks production sharing agreement between Petroecuador and PESA, Petroecuador is
entitled to a crude oil production share ranging between 12.5% and 18.5%, depending on the fields
daily crude oil production and crude oil gravity.
PESA also conducted extensive exploratory work in Block 31, including the drilling of four
exploratory wells, which led to the discovery of the Apaika/Nenke, Obe, and Minta fields.
In August 2004, the Ecuadorian Government approved an environmental impact study, but due to
limitations imposed by the Ministry of the Environment in Ecuador (MAE) relating to works within
Parque Nacional Yasuní, works were temporarily suspended. Petrobras Energía Ecuador, MAE and the
Ministry of Energy and Mines of Ecuador are working to agree on a new development plan for Block
31. Based on the proposal submitted by the Company, the new development project associated with the
Apaika and Nenke fields will minimize impact on Parque Nacional Yasuní. PESA will use cutting-edge
technology in connection with oil production and environmental protection, this certainly being an
example of integration between oil production activities and nature.
Regarding the exploitation of Blocks 18 and 31, PESA signed an agreement with OCP (Oleoducto
de Crudos Pesados), whereby an oil transportation capacity of 80,000 bbl/d is secured for a 15-year
term, starting November 10, 2003.
On January 11, 2007, PESA obtained approval from the Ecuadorian Government, for the sales
agreement by which it will transfer 40% of its rights and interest in Blocks 18 and 31 and the
corresponding rights and obligations, including in the OCP, to Teikoku Oil Co. As a result of this
authorization, the parties are currently in the process of completing the necessary formalities,
including the necessary steps towards obtaining amendments to the
68
participation contracts, in order
to incorporate Teikoku as a partner in the agreements for Blocks 18 and 31. Once the amendments
are finalized, the terms and economic conditions of the Teikoku transaction will go into effect.
See InternationalEcuadorian Activities.
As of December 31, 2006, PESAs crude oil proved reserves in Ecuador were approximately 53.9
million of barrels of oil and its oil production averaged 11.9 thousand barrels per day.
Peruvian Activities
As of December 31, 2006, PESAs combined crude oil and natural gas proved reserves in Peru
were approximately 88 million of barrels of oil equivalent and PESAs combined oil and gas
production averaged 14.5 thousand barrels per day.
In May 2004, PESA entered into a contract with Repsol Exploración Perú S.A. to perform certain
exploration activities jointly in Block 57, which is located in the Ucayali basin. Pursuant to
this contract, PESA participates in Block 57 with a 35.15% interest. As of November 2004, PESA
entered into an agreement with Occidental for the assignment to Petrobras Energía de Perú S.A. of
30% of the rights in the License Agreement for Hydrocarbon Exploration and Production in Lote 103.
In 2005, PESA entered into license agreements for hydrocarbon exploration and production in
Lote 58 and Lote 110 at the Ucayali Basin (adjacent to Camisea) and in Lote 112 at the Marañón
Basin. Perupetro has recently awarded Petrobras Energía del Perú S.A Lote 117 located at the
Marañón Basin.
In 2006, we drilled 45 wells and performed 219 workovers. In addition, we extended our
secondary recovery project, with 6 conversions of producing wells to injectors. As a result,
investments for the year totaled approximately U.S.$64 million.
Uruguayan Activities
In December 2004, we entered the Uruguayan market through the acquisition of 55% of the voting
shares of Conecta S/A, which is one of the two local natural gas distribution companies operating
in Uruguay, for U.S.$3.2 million. The other 45% of the Conectas voting shares remains with the
state-owned Administratión Nacional de Combustibles Alcohol y Portland ANCAP.
Conecta has exclusive rights to supply small to medium-size consumers with a demand of up to
5,000 cmpd, and operates in small cities in Uruguay such as, Paysandu, Ciudad de la Costa y
Colonia, selling 57,000 cmpd. Conectas revenues in 2006 were U.S.$5.6 million.
In June of 2006, we finished the acquisition of 66% of the shares of Gaseba UruguayGrupo Gaz
de France S.A. (Gaseba), a natural gas distribution concession in Montevideo, Uruguay. The
company is now changing its name to Distribuidora de Gas de Montevideo Grupo Petrobras. Gaseba
has exclusive rights to supply small to medium-size consumers with a demand of up to 5,000 cmpd,
and operates in the Montevideo area, selling 133,000 cmpd. Gaseba revenues under our management in
2006 were U.S.$15.1 million.
Also in June of 2006, we completed the acquisition of Shells fuel and lubricant retail and
commercial businesses in Uruguay. The company now controls 89 services stations, and installations
for aviation fuel and asphalt, and a marine fuels business. Under our management in 2006, Petrobras
Uruguay Distribución SA had U.S.$168.9 million in revenues, selling 199 thousand cubic meters of
products.
Paraguayan Activities
In March of 2006, we completed the acquisition of Shells fuel and lubricant retail and
commercial businesses in Paraguay. The Company now controls 131 services stations, with 45
convenience stores, installations for aviation fuel supply and one LPG refueling plant. In 2006,
under our management, Petrobras Paraguay Distribución Ltd had U.S.$171 million in revenues, selling
234 thousand cubic meters of products.
69
Colombian Activities
In 2006, the National Hydrocarbons Agency and Ecopetrol approved the farm-in contract signed
in 2005 with Hocol, which allowed us to acquire concession rights in the Upar, San Jacinto, Rio
Paez, Achira and Rio Cabrera blocks.
In 2006, we had interests in ten exploration contracts and seven production contracts in
Colombia, including the recently acquired Tibu field, the contract for which was agreed upon with
Ecopetrol in December 2006. We are the operating company in twelve of these contracts.
As of December 31, 2006, our combined crude oil and natural gas proved reserves in Colombia
were approximately 35.5 million of barrels of oil equivalent and our combined oil and gas
production averaged 16.9 thousand barrels per day.
At the end of 2006, we had control over 47 service stations and 17 convenience stores in
Colombia, all of which now use our new brand image.
We carried out seismic studies in Block Tayrona, a 22,346km2 offshore block in the
Caribbean Sea of Colombia, in association with Exxon and Ecopetrol. We are the operator of the
concession during the exploration phase.
U.S. Gulf of Mexico Activities
Petrobras America, Inc., or PAI, our wholly-owned subsidiary, continues to expand its
activities in the Gulf of Mexicos deep and ultra-deep waters either through farm-in agreements
(by which PAI, rather than obtaining an interest directly from the relevant government authorities,
acquires an interest from a party who has already obtained such interest), or participation in
Lease Sales conducted by the United States Minerals Management Service (the U.S. industry
regulator). As of December 31, 2006, PAI held interests in 319 offshore blocks in the Gulf of
Mexico from shallow to ultra-deep waters and 1 onshore block, 170 of which were operated by our
subsidiary.
As a result of its participation in Gulf of Mexico Lease Sale 198 and 200 in 2006, Petrobras
was awarded a total of 43 exploration blocks: 37 blocks strengthened its position in deep and
ultra-deep oil prospects while 6 blocks create a strong coverage in the westernmost part of the
Gulf, where we now hold full control over 10 prospects with good potential for gas.
The average production in the Gulf of Mexico reached only 4.0 thousand barrels of oil
equivalent per day (boed), approximately 65% of the target, mainly due to operational matters
relating to the ongoing effects of Hurricanes Rita and Katrina, which occurred at the end of 2005.
In August 2006, we announced the acquisition of 25% participation of the Cascade Field and
26.67% participation of the Chinook field from BHP Billiton. PAI also agreed to buy the 15%
participation from Hess in the Chinook Field. Since then, PAI has held 50% and 66.67% in Cascade
and Chinook, respectively, and is the current operator of the two field developments. In December
2006, PAI announced the approval of the Conceptual Plan for the development of Cascade and Chinook
from the United States Minerals Management Service (MMS). The plan includes the deployment of the
first Floating, Production, Storage and Offloading (FPSO) facility in the Gulf of Mexico. PAI has
proposed the use of six technologies which are new to the U.S. Gulf of Mexico including a
disconnectable turret buoy allowing the FPSO to move offsite during hurricanes and severe weather
conditions, crude transportation via shuttle tanker, free-standing hybrid risers, underwater
electric submersible pumps, torpedo pile vertical loaded anchors and polyester mooring systems.
In September 2006, we announced the closing of the acquisition by PAI of 50% of Pasadena
Refining System Inc. (PRSI), formerly the Crown Refinery in Pasadena Texas from Astra Oil Company,
a U.S.-based refining and trading company owned by the Belgian group Compagnie Nationale a
Portefeuille SA-CNP. The purchase price was approximately U.S.$416 million. PAI and Astra are
conducting studies to expand its capacity and install units that will enable it to process heavy
oils and deliver high quality products.
70
In February 2007, we announced that the first well of the Cottonwood Field started production
with initial output of 1.1 million cubic meters of gas and 4,000 barrels of light oil (condensate)
per day. A second well started production in March, boosting gas production to 2 million cubic
meters per day. Together, the two wells will take the field production to about 20,000 barrels of
oil equivalent per day. Cottonwood is the biggest Petrobras America field in production, leading
PAI production to surpass 25,000 barrels of oil equivalent per day (boed) during 2007, up from the
current 4,000 boed. This is the first deepwater field we have developed and put into production
abroad as an operator. PAI holds 100% of Cottonwood Field, following the acquisition of 20% from
Mariner Energy Inc. in November 2006. This event marks our return, as an operator, to the Gulf of
Mexico.
Mexican Activities
In 2003, as part of the bidding launched by Petróleos Mexicanos (PEMEX) for the operation of
areas under multiple service contracts, contracts for the Cuervito and Fronterizo blocks were
awarded to a joint venture
composed of us (45% interest), the Japanese company Teikoku (40%) and the Mexican company
Diavaz (15%). There are 12 gas discoveries in this block, which shall be developed with a total
expenditure of U.S.$510 million.
In 2006, this operation obtained the process certification, Development, infrastructure and
maintenance for activities in non-associate gas fields, according to ISO 14001 and OHSAS 18001.
African Activities
We have interests in four blocks in Nigeria, OML-127, OML-130, OPL-324 and OPL-315. We are
partners in the Agbami Field, in the OML127 block, operated by Chevron, which is presently in the
development phase, First, oil is estimated to occur in mid 2008, from an FPSO with a production
capacity of 250,000 bpd. We also have a participation in the Akpo field, in the OML-130 block,
operated by Total, with production scheduled to commence at the end of 2008, also by the means of a
FPSO (185,000 bpd), which is now under construction. In 2006, we drilled 6 development wells in the
Agbami field and 6 in the Apko field. Agbami and Akpo are both considered to be world class oil
fields and we expect our share in their production to correspond to an aggregate of 67,000 bpd at
their peak. Two other discoveries are under appraisal on Block OML-130: the Egina and Preowey
fields, where we drilled three successful extension wells in 2006. During 2006 we also drilled an
exploration well, known as a wildcat dry hole, in the OML-130 Block.
We are the operating company in two other exploration blocks in Nigeria. In OPL-324, with
ExxonMobil and Statoil as partners, we drilled one exploration well in 2006, fulfilling the
exploration commitment for the second contractual phase, which ends in December 2008. Our
participation in Block OPL-315 was acquired in the last Nigerian Bid Round, held in August 2005.
The Production Sharing Agreement with NNPC was signed in February 2006. Our partners in this
venture are Statoil and Ask Petroleum.
We withdrew from the exploration block OPL-250 and we are the operating company in two other
exploration blocks, OPL-324 and OPL-315. In 2006 we drilled one dry hole exploration well in Block
324. Participation in Block OPL-315 was acquired in the last Nigerian Bid Round, held in August
2005 and the first exploration well is expected to be drilled in 2007.
In 2006, in Equatorial Guinea, we had a 50% participation in the drilling of a deepwater well
operated by Chevron in Block L, which turned out to be dry. Chevron and Hess terminated operations
in Block L, while we and our other partners, Tollow Oil and Sasol, awaited a decision from the
government of Equatorial Guinea regarding the request for a three years extension of the current
exploration phase concession, with additional seismic coverage as commitment. Our participation in
Block L would increase to 67%, and we would be the operator.
On March 12, 2005, we signed an exploration and joint production agreement with Libyas
state-owned National Oil Corporation (NOC). This agreement provides for the exploration of four
blocks in Area 18, which have an extension of 10,307 square kilometers and are located in the
Mediterranean Sea at water depths of 200 to 700 meters. We own a 70% interest in a consortium with
Oil Search Limited (OSL) and will be the operating company in the area. Under the agreement, the
exploration phase will last five years and may be extended for 25 more years if discoveries are
made. We will be required to drill a well and conduct seismic evaluations.
71
The Angolan branch of our wholly-owned subsidiary, Petrobras International Braspetro B.V., has
continued to perform as a non-operating partner in two licenses under petroleum sharing agreements.
No exploratory drilling was carried out in Angola during 2006. As of December 31, 2006, our
combined crude oil and natural gas proved reserves in Angola were approximately 7.4 million of
barrels of oil equivalent. For the year 2006, oil production averaged 5.37 thousand barrels per
day.
We recently participated in three bidding rounds promoted by Angolan government in 2006 and
acquired interests in 4 exploration blocks offshore Angola: deep water Blocks 15/06, 18/06 and 26,
being the operator in the latter two, and shallow water Block 6, also holding the operatorship.
Drilling activity in such blocks shall begin not earlier than 2008. Block 18/06 is the remaining
area of Block 18, operated by BP. Likewise Block 18/06 which is the remaining area of Block 15/06,
operated by Exxon.
In Tanzania, we acquired and processed new seismic data in Blocks 5 and 6, located in the deep
and ultra-deep waters of the Mafia Basin. The Production sharing agreement for Block 6 (11,099
km2) was signed in December, which together with Block 5, amounts to 20.3 thousand km2. We hold 100%
of the rights and the operating right to both blocks. Depending on the studies now underway, we
may enter a partnership in Block 5 to go to the next phase in securing an exploration license and
drilling the first well in that Block.
We acquired a 17% interest in the Zambezi Delta Block in Mozambique, an area of 45,000
km2 located offshore of Mozambique. The Company is committed to drilling a well in
2007. We are also expecting a seismic study for this year.
In November 2006, we also signed a Memorandum of Understanding with a local state company
named Empresa Nacional de Hidrocarbonetos (ENH), in order to jointly undertake E&P studies and
biofuel related activities in the country, as well as professional training.
Middle East Activities
In Iran we have a company called Petrobras Middle East B.V. (PEMID) and the principal activity
is oil exploration and production. On July 14, 2004, PEMID signed with the National Iranian Oil
Company, or NIOC, a Service Contract relating to exploration operation in the TUSAN block in
shallow waters of the Persian Gulf, or the Contract Area. The exploration period under the Contract
shall be 3.5 years. The operations authorized by NIOC to be carried out by PEMID are mainly related
to exploration and appraisal for petroleum by topographical, geological, geophysical and other
methods including seismic acquisition, drilling and all other activities normally associated with
exploration in the Contract Area. We own a 100% interest in this block. The exploration will be
carried out by PEMID, which was organized in October 2004. The first exploration well of the Tusan
Block was drilled at the end of 2006. During 2006, we also evaluated other exploration
opportunities in the Middle East.
According to the terms of the Contract, during the exploration period a minimum amount of
U.S.$32.2 million must be spent and if the Contract enters into optional exploration period, a
further minimum amount of U.S.$10.0 million must be spent for exploration operations in the
Contract Area. On December 20, 2005, the Company received approval from NIOC to spend up to
$U.S.77.8 million. Furthermore, the total expenditures incurred would be recoverable from NIOC only
if the exploration operations result in commercial discovery.
Turkey Activities
In Turkey, we have a company called Petrobras Oil & Gas (PO&G) and we formed a partnership
with the Turkish National Oil Company, Turkiye Petrolleri Anonim Ortaklig (TPAO) to explore and
produce oil in two blocks with significant reserve potential in the Black Sea. The first is named
the Kirklarelli block (License 3920), located in the western part of the Turkish portion of the
Black Sea at a water depth of 1,200 meters. The second is called the Sinop block (License 3922),
located in the central part of the Black Sea at a depth of 2,200 meters underwater. The two Joint
Operating Agreements (JOA) were signed on August 17, 2006 and validated by the Turkish government
on December 27, 2006. According to our completed technical evaluation, the two blocks that we
purchased are the ones that present the best geological possibilities.
72
At the end of February 2007, we finished our 3D seismic survey commitment for both blocks.
Pursuant to our drilling commitment, we are looking for drilling services for the second quarter of
2009. In this regard, we signed a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on March 2007, in connection
with our drilling commitment.
We were the winner of two of the three blocks offered in the bidding process for deepwater
exploration and production in the Black Sea held by the TPAO.
PifCo
PifCo was established on September 24, 1997 as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Braspetro Oil
Services Company, or Brasoil, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Petrobras Internacional S.A.
(Braspetro), which has since been absorbed by us. PifCo was initially incorporated under the name
Brasoil Finance Company, which was changed by special resolution of PifCos Sole Shareholder to
Petrobras International Finance Company on September 25, 1997. On January 14, 2000, the board of
directors of Braspetro as well as our board of directors approved the transfer of 100% of PifCos
voting shares from Brasoil to us. Since April 1, 2000, PifCo has been our wholly-owned subsidiary.
On May 7, 2007, we replaced the existing Memorandum and Articles of Association in its
entirety, with a new amended and restated Memorandum and Articles of Association. PifCo is a tax exempt
company incorporated with limited liability under the laws of the Cayman Islands. PifCos
registered office is located at Harbour Place, 103 South Church Street, 4th floor,
George Town, Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands, and PifCos telephone number is 55-21-2240-1258. We are
in the process of revising the current Memorandum and Articles of Association to increase the
capital stock and to amend the stated purpose of PifCo. See Item 19 for a description of Exhibit
1.2 to this Annual Report.
PifCo Business Overview
PifCo was incorporated in order to facilitate and finance the import of crude oil and oil
products by us into Brazil. Accordingly, PifCos primary function is to act as an intermediary
between third-party oil suppliers and us by engaging in crude oil and oil product purchases from
international suppliers and reselling crude oil and oil products in U.S. dollars to us on a
deferred payment basis, at a price which includes a premium to compensate PifCo for its financing
costs. PifCo is generally able to obtain credit to finance purchases on the same terms granted to
us, and PifCo buys crude oil and oil products at the same price that suppliers would charge us
directly.
As part of our strategy to expand our international operations and facilitate our access to
international capital markets, PifCo engages in borrowings in international capital markets
supported by us, primarily through standby purchase agreements of the related securities.
In addition, PifCo also engages in a number of activities that are conducted by four
wholly-owned subsidiaries:
|
|
|
Petrobras Europe Limited, or PEL, a United Kingdom company that acts as an agent and
advisor in connection with our trading activities in Europe, the Middle East, the Far
East and North Africa; |
|
|
|
|
Petrobras Finance Limited, or PFL, a Cayman Islands company, that carries out a
financing program supported by future sales of fuel oil; |
|
|
|
|
Bear Insurance Company Limited, or BEAR, a company incorporated in Bermuda that
contracts insurance for us and our subsidiaries; and |
|
|
|
|
Petrobras Singapore Private Limited, or PSPL, a company incorporated in Singapore to
trade crude oil and oil products in connection with our trading activities in Asia.
This company initiated its operations in July 2006. |
As part of our restructuring of our international business segment, in January 2003, PifCo
transferred to us Petrobras Netherlands B.V., or PNBV, a Dutch company engaged in leasing
activities of primarily offshore equipment to be used by us for exploration and production of crude
oil and natural gas. PNBV became our directly wholly-owned subsidiary, effective as of January
2003.
73
Beginning in 2004, as part of our restructuring of our offshore subsidiaries in order to
centralize trading operations, PifCo has engaged in limited exports of oil and oil products and has
begun to store oil and oil products in Asia.
PifCos Principal Commercial Activities
PifCos principal activity is the purchase of crude oil and oil products for resale to us and,
to a limited extent, third parties. PifCo acquires substantially all of its crude oil and oil
products either through purchases on the spot market or short-term supply contracts. PifCo acquires
a small portion of its crude oil and oil products through long-term supply contracts. PifCos crude
oil and oil product purchase obligations are, in most instances, guaranteed by us. PifCo sells the
products to us at the purchase price it paid, plus a premium, determined in accordance with a
formula designed to pass on PifCos average costs of capital to us.
In addition, PifCo finances its oil trading activities principally from commercial banks,
including lines of credit and commercial paper programs, as well as through inter-company loans
from us and the issuance of notes in the international capital markets.
The following chart illustrates how PifCo acts as the intermediary between international crude
oil suppliers and us.
PifCo purchases crude oil and oil products from international oil suppliers on a
free-on-board (F.O.B.) basis under standard terms that traditionally require payment within 30 days
from the bill of lading. Before February 2005, we bought crude oil and oil products from PifCo
under terms that allowed for payment up to 270 days from the date of the bill of lading. Since
February 2005, we began to buy crude oil and oil products from PifCo under terms that allow for
payment up to 330 days from the date of the bill of lading. We would typically be unable to meet
the 30-day payment term imposed by international suppliers because of the complexity of Brazilian
customs and importing regulations. For example, if a shipment to which a bill of lading relates
must be delivered to different parts of Brazil, different sets of documents must be delivered to
each delivery point. Depending on the unloading ports locations, this process may be completed up
to 120 days from the vessels departure. Because PifCo is not subject to the Brazilian regulations
applicable to us, PifCo can pay the international supplier on time without having to produce these
different sets of documents. To cover its financing costs, PifCo includes a premium when it sells
crude oil and oil products to us.
PifCos subsidiaries are:
Petrobras Europe Limited (PEL)
In May 2001, PifCo established PEL, a wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated and based in the
United Kingdom, to consolidate our trade activities in Europe, the Middle East, the Far East and
North Africa. These
74
activities consist of advising on, and negotiating the terms and conditions
for, crude oil and oil products supplied to PifCo and us, as well as marketing Brazilian crude oil
and crude oil products exported to the geographic areas in which PEL operates. PEL plays an
advisory role in connection with these activities and undertakes no direct or additional commercial
or financial risk. PEL provides these advisory and marketing services as an independent contractor,
pursuant to a services agreement between PEL and us. In exchange, we compensate PEL for all costs
incurred in connection with these activities, plus a margin.
Petrobras Finance Limited (PFL)
In December 2001, PifCo established PFL, a wholly-owned subsidiary incorporated and registered
in the Cayman Islands. PFL primarily purchases fuel oil from us and sells the products in the
international market in order to generate export receivables to cover its obligations to transfer
these receivables to a trust under an exports prepayment program. Until June 1, 2006, PFL also
purchased bunker fuel from us. The exports prepayment program helps provide PFL with the funding
necessary to purchase oil products from us, as described below.
Bear Insurance Company Limited (BEAR)
In January 2003, PifCo received BEAR from Brasoil. This transaction took place as part of the
restructuring of our international business segment. BEAR currently serves as an intermediary for
us, advising on, and negotiating the terms and conditions of, certain of our insurance policies.
Petrobras Singapore Private Limited (PSPL)
In April 2006, PifCo incorporated a new wholly-owned subsidiary: Petrobras Singapore Private
Limited, or PSPL, a company incorporated in Singapore to trade crude oil and oil products in
connection with our trading activities in Asia. This company initiated operations on July 1, 2006.
Exports Prepayment Program
We sell and deliver fuel oil and, subject to certain conditions, other oil products
(collectively, the Eligible Products) to PFL under two principal agreements: Master Export
Contract and the Prepayment Agreement. Until June 1, 2006, bunker fuel was also an Eligible Product
under the Agreement, but was excluded from the Program after a Consent Solicitation approved by the
investors on May 23, 2006. The PF Export Receivables Master Trust, or the Trust, was formed under
the laws of the Cayman Islands to provide PFL with the funding necessary to purchase Eligible
Products from Petrobras and resell these products through the arrangements described below.
On May 21, 2003, the Trust issued to PFL U.S.$550 million of Senior Trust Certificates (the
Series 2003-A Senior Trust Certificates), maturing on June 1, 2015. On the same date, the Trust
issued U.S.$200 million of Senior Trust Certificates (the Series 2003-B Senior Trust
Certificates), maturing on June 1, 2013. The Series 2003-A Senior Trust Certificates, along with
the Series 2003-B Senior Trust Certificates, represent senior undivided beneficial interests in the
property of the Trust (other than certain charitable property held by the Trust).
On the same date, the Trust also issued to PFL U.S.$110 million in Series 2003-A Junior Trust
Certificates and U.S.$40 million in Series 2003-B Junior Trust Certificates (collectively, the
Series 2003 Junior Trust Certificates. The Series 2003 Junior Trust Certificates represent junior
subordinated undivided beneficial interests in the property of the Trust (other than the charitable
property).
The series 2003-A Senior Trust Certificates, the 2003-B Senior Trust Certificates and the
2003-A Junior Trust Certificates, the 2003-B Junior Trust Certificates are referred to collectively
as series 2003 Trust Certificates.
PFL agreed to transfer the Trustee, in return for the Series 2003 Senior Trust Certificates
and Series 2003 Junior Trust Certificates, the right to an additional specified amount of
receivables to be generated from PFLs sale of Eligible Products with a value equal to the
aggregate amount scheduled to be paid in respect of the Series 2003 Senior Trust Certificates and
the Series 2003 Junior Trust Certificates. The value of receivables scheduled to be designated for
sale in any quarterly period represents a portion, but not all, of the receivables expected to be
generated from the sale of Eligible Products by PFL in such period. The remainder of such
receivables remains the property of PFL.
75
The timely payment of interest on, and scheduled principal of, the Series 2003-B Senior Trust
Certificates is unconditionally and irrevocably guaranteed under a financial guaranty insurance
policy issued by MBIA Insurance Corporation. The Series 2003-A Senior Trust Certificates do not
have the benefit of any financial guaranty insurance policy.
In addition to the Series 2003 Senior Trust Certificates currently outstanding, additional
series of senior trust certificates (which may or may not benefit from a financial guaranty
insurance policy) may be issued to PFL from time to time if Petrobras agrees to sell additional
Eligible Products to PFL in an amount that is adequate to make all required payments under the
additional series of senior trust certificates and certain other conditions are met.
The other Senior Trust Certificates, issued in 2001, were prepaid. PFL prepaid the floating
rate Senior Trust Certificates (Series 2001-A2 and 2001-C) on September 1, 2005 and the fixed rate
Senior Trust Certificates (Series 2001-A1 and 2001-B) on March 1, 2006, in accordance with the
applicable provisions of the governing agreements.
Petrobras Bunker Fuel and Fuel Oil Business
As described above, PFL, a wholly-owned subsidiary of PifCo, purchases fuel oil from us and
sells the products in the international market in order to generate export receivables to cover its
obligations under the exports prepayment program. Until June 1, 2006, PFL also purchased bunker
fuel from us but since then we have been selling bunker fuel in the international market directly
and this product is no longer subject to our exports prepayment program.
Bunker fuel is a common term for marine fuels that are burned in the boilers or engines of
ships. We produce and export two types of bunker fuel: intermediate fuel oil or marine fuel (for
ships main engines and, occasionally, auxiliary engines) and marine diesel fuel or marine gas oil
(for auxiliary engines and main engines of military vessels).
Our bunker fuel production in 2006 was 29,629 Mbbl, as compared to 28,000 Mbbl in 2005 and
27,425 Mbbl in 2004. Our total bunker fuel production totaled 141,664 Mbbl for the period from
January 1, 2002 to December 31, 2006. We export approximately 80% of the bunker fuel we produce,
with the exception of bunker fuel used by our fleet. Bunker fuel that we sell in Brazil to ships
owned by non-Brazilian companies is considered an export under Brazilian regulations.
PETROBRAS ANNUAL BUNKER FUEL PRODUCTION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
|
|
(Mbbl) |
Export |
|
|
23,588 |
|
|
|
22,948 |
|
|
|
22,452 |
|
|
|
21,402 |
|
|
|
23,653 |
|
Domestic Consumption |
|
|
1,614 |
|
|
|
1,313 |
|
|
|
1,061 |
|
|
|
1,048 |
|
|
|
1,620 |
|
Petrobras Fleet |
|
|
4,427 |
|
|
|
3,739 |
|
|
|
3,912 |
|
|
|
4,291 |
|
|
|
4,596 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
29,629 |
|
|
|
28,000 |
|
|
|
27,425 |
|
|
|
26,741 |
|
|
|
29,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel oil originates from residual fractions of distillation units at the refinery and from
other processes such as de-asphalting. Diluents in the form of lighter cutter stocks are mixed into
the residue pool to create the desired viscosity for different types of fuel oil.
Major buyers of our fuel oil include utilities, refineries and traders. Fuel oil is used by
industries and utilities to run machinery and generate electricity. Commercial buildings and homes
employ fuel oil for heating purposes, and refineries use fuel oil for blending purposes.
Fuel Oil Export Sales
The following table sets forth our fuel oil export sales for the period from 2002 to 2006:
76
FUEL OIL EXPORT SALES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
2003 |
|
2002 |
Millions of U.S.$ |
|
|
1,500.1 |
|
|
|
1,077.6 |
|
|
|
1,306.1 |
|
|
|
967.3 |
|
|
|
697.0 |
|
Millions of Barrels |
|
|
67.3 |
|
|
|
25.5 |
|
|
|
47.5 |
|
|
|
38.4 |
|
|
|
30.8 |
|
Organizational Structure
All of our 22 direct subsidiaries listed below are incorporated under the laws of Brazil,
except PifCo, Petrobras International Braspetro B.V. (PIB BV), Braspetro Oil Company (BOC),
Braspetro Oil Services Company (Brasoil) and Petrobras Netherlands B.V. (PNBV), which are
incorporated abroad. See Exhibit 8.1 for a complete list of our subsidiaries.
77
The following diagram sets forth our significant consolidated subsidiaries as of December 31,
2006:
See Exhibit 8.1 for a complete list of our subsidiaries, including their full names, jurisdictions
of incorporation and our percentage equity interest.
78
Property, Plants and Equipment
Petrobras
Under Brazilian law, the Brazilian government owns all crude oil and natural gas reserves
within Brazil, and we have certain rights to exploit those reserves pursuant to concessions. The
greater part of our property, consisting of refineries and storage, production, manufacturing and
transportation facilities, is located in Brazil. Our main owned and leased tangible assets consist
of our wells, our platforms, our refining facilities, our pipelines, our vessels and other
transportation assets and our power plants. Some of these assets are subject to liens but the value
of such encumbered assets is not material. See Item 4. Information on the Company for a
description of our reserves, sources of crude oil and natural gas, main tangible assets and
material plans for expansion and improvements in our facilities.
PifCo
PifCo does not own or lease any material tangible properties or fixed assets. The majority of
PifCos assets consist of leasehold improvements, computers and furniture. In January 2003, PifCo
transferred its subsidiary PNBV to us as part of our restructuring of our subsidiaries according to
the areas of business each subsidiary deals in.
Regulation of the Oil and Gas Industry in Brazil
Regulatory Framework
Under Brazilian law, the Brazilian government owns all crude oil and natural gas reserves in
Brazil. In addition, Article 1 of Law No. 2,004 of 1953 granted the Brazilian government a monopoly
over the research, exploration, production, refining and transportation of crude oil and oil
products in Brazil and its continental shelf, subject only to the right of companies engaged in
crude oil refining and the distribution of oil products at that time to continue those activities.
Under Article 2 of Law No. 2,004, the Brazilian government made us its exclusive agent for purposes
of exploiting the Brazilian governments monopoly. In 1988, when it enacted the current Brazilian
Constitution, the Brazilian Congress incorporated Article 1 of Law No. 2,004 into the Constitution
and included within the scope of the Brazilian governments monopoly the importation and
exportation of crude oil and oil products.
Beginning in 1995, the Brazilian government undertook a comprehensive reform of the countrys
oil and gas regulatory system. On November 9, 1995, the Brazilian Congress amended the Brazilian
Constitution to authorize the Brazilian government to contract with any state or privately-owned
company to carry out the activities related to the upstream and downstream segments of the
Brazilian oil and gas sector. Accordingly, this amendment made it possible to end our
government-granted monopoly. The amendment was implemented by the enactment of the Oil Law No.
9,478, which revoked Law No. 2,004.
The Oil Law provided for the establishment of a new regulatory framework, ending our exclusive
agency and enabling competition in all aspects of the oil and gas industry in Brazil. As a result
of this constitutional amendment and the subsequent and ongoing implementation of the changes under
the Oil Law, its amendments and related regulations, we have been operating in an environment of
gradual deregulation and increasing competition.
The Oil Law also created an independent regulatory agency, the Agência Nacional de Petróleo,
Gas, e Combustíveis Renováveis (ANP). The ANPs function is to regulate the oil, natural gas and
renewable fuels industry in Brazil. A primary objective of the ANP is to create a competitive
environment for oil and gas activities in Brazil that will lead to the lowest price and best
services for consumers. Among its principal responsibilities is to regulate
concession terms for upstream development and award new exploration concessions. See Item 10.
Additional InformationMaterial ContractsPetrobrasConcession Agreements with the ANP.
The Oil Law granted us the exclusive right to exploit the crude oil reserves in all fields
where we had previously commenced production, in accordance with the concession agreement entered
into with the ANP on August 6, 1998. For each concession area, we were granted an exclusivity
period of 27 years as of the date the field was declared to be commercially profitable.
79
The Oil Law also established a procedural framework for us to claim exclusive exploratory
rights for a period of up to three years, which was later extended to five years, with respect to
areas where we could demonstrate that we had established prospects prior to the enactment of the
Oil Law. In order to perfect our claim to explore and develop these areas, we had to demonstrate
that we had the required financial capacity to carry out these activities, either alone or through
other cooperative arrangements.
Each year we are required to submit our capital expenditures budget for the following fiscal
year to the Ministry of Planning, Budget and Management and the Ministry of Mines and Energy. Once
reviewed by those offices, the capital expenditures budget is then submitted to the Brazilian
Congress for approval. As a result of this process, the total level of our capital expenditures for
each fiscal year is regulated, although the specific application of funds is left to our
discretion. Since mid-1991, we have obtained substantial amounts of our financing from the
international capital markets, mainly through the issuance of commercial paper and short, medium
and long-term notes, and have increasingly been able to raise long-term funds for large capital
expenditure items such as rigs and platforms.
Our strategic objectives and planning are subject to supervision by the Ministry of Planning,
Budget and Management. Our activities are also subject to regulation by the Ministry of Finance and
the Ministry of Mines and Energy, among others. In addition, since our common and preferred shares
and ADSs are traded on the São Paulo Stock Exchange, the New York Stock Exchange, Mercados del
Valores Latinoamericanos en Euros (LATIBEX) and Buenos Aires Stock Exchange, respectively, we are
also regulated by the Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (Brazilian Securities Commission, or the
CVM), the Securities and Exchange Commission, Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores CNMV and
Comisión Nacional de Valores, or the CNV, as of April 27, 2006.
Brazil is not a member of OPEC, but we have been invited to attend OPEC meetings as an
observer. Therefore, neither Brazil nor we are bound by OPEC guidelines. However, to the extent
that OPEC influences international crude oil prices, our prices are affected, as our prices are
linked to international crude oil prices.
Price Regulation
Since January 2, 2002, pursuant to Law No. 9,990, and as set forth below, the Brazilian
government eliminated price controls for crude oil and oil products, except for the natural gas
sold for qualifying gas-fired power plants. This led to increased competition and further price
adjustments, as other companies were allowed to participate in the Brazilian market and import and
export crude oil, oil products and natural gas to and from Brazil.
Prices remain regulated, however, for certain natural gas sales contracts and electricity.
To permit the taxation of all imported crude oil, oil products and natural gas in conjunction
with the opening of the market to all participants, the Brazilian government established an excise
tax to be applied with respect to the sale and import of crude oil, oil products and natural gas
products (Contribuição de Intervenção no Domínio Econômico, Contribution for Intervention in the
Economic Sector, or CIDE). Until April 30, 2004, the amounts paid as CIDE could be deducted from
the payments of the PIS/PASEP and COFINS taxes.
As of May 1, 2004, important changes were made regarding the taxation of oil products sales.
The amount paid as CIDE that can be deducted from PIS (Programa de Integração Social)/PASEP
(Programa de Formação do Patrimônio do Servidor Público) and COFINS (Contribuição para o
Financiamento da Seguridade Social) was reduced to zero. The PIS/PASEP tax and the COFINS tax
previously ad valorem taxes on imported products were converted into specific value taxes, and the
CIDE tax was changed to the following rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PIS/PASEP |
|
|
|
|
and COFINS |
|
|
Product |
|
rate |
|
CIDE |
|
|
(reais/m3, except |
|
|
LPG/metric ton) |
Gasoline |
|
R$ |
261.60 |
|
|
|
280.0 |
|
Diesel |
|
|
148.00 |
|
|
|
70.0 |
|
Jet Fuel |
|
|
71.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
LPG |
|
|
167.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
80
For certain trading transaction, the taxpayer may still opt to pay the PIS/PASEP tax and the
COFINS as ad valorem taxes.
Previously, beginning with the implementation of the Oil Law in 1997 and through December 31,
2001, the Brazilian oil and gas sector was significantly deregulated and the Brazilian government
changed its price regulation policies. Under these regulations, the Brazilian government:
|
|
|
introduced a new methodology for determining the price of oil products designed to
track prevailing international prices and the real/U.S. dollar exchange rate; |
|
|
|
|
eliminated regulation of the cost at which we could record imported crude oil and
oil products in our cost of sales; |
|
|
|
|
gradually eliminated controls on wholesale prices at which we could sell our oil
products, except for diesel, gasoline and LPG; |
|
|
|
|
effective July 28, 1998, eliminated transportation cost equalization subsidies known
as Frete para Uniformização de Preços (Freight for the Uniformity of Prices, or FUP),
in the case of transportation subsidies for oil products, and Frete para Uniformização
de Preços do Álcool (Freight for the Uniformity of Prices of Alcohol, or FUPA), in the
case of transportation subsidies for fuel alcohol; and |
|
|
|
|
continued to require that we act as the Brazilian governments administrator for the
fuel alcohol program. |
Until the passage of the Oil Law 9,478 in 1997, the Brazilian government had the power to
regulate all aspects of the pricing of crude oil, oil products, fuel alcohol and other energy
sources in Brazil, including natural Gas and Power.
Crude Oil and Refined Oil Products
Pursuant to the Oil Law and subsequent legislation as per Law No. 10,336 dated December 19,
2001, the oil and gas markets in Brazil underwent regulatory change beginning January 2, 2002. As
part of this action:
|
|
|
the Brazilian government no longer set sales prices for crude oil and oil products;
and |
|
|
|
|
the Brazilian government established CIDE, an excise tax payable to the Brazilian
government required to be paid by producers, blenders and importers upon sales and
purchases of specified oil and fuel products at a set amount for different products
based on the unit of measurement typically used for such products. |
Previously, until the enactment of the Oil Law, the Brazilian government regulated all aspects
of the pricing of crude oil and oil products in Brazil, from the cost of crude oil imported for use
in our refineries, to the price of refined oil products charged to the consumer.
Natural Gas
Starting in January 2002, price controls on natural gas prices in Brazil were eliminated.
Some contracts that were signed under the old system of price controls are still in force, but new
contracts must contain clauses ensuring that prices are freely negotiated amongst the parties.
The Petroleum and Alcohol Account Certification and Settlement As provided in the Oil Law
9,478, the fuel market in Brazil was freed of price controls as of January 1, 2002, permitting
other companies to produce and sell on the domestic market and, also, import and export oil and oil
products. In addition, as of January 1, 2002, we were no longer required to charge the prices
established by the Brazilian government on the sale of oil products, and the realization price is
no longer established by a formula adjusted to the international market.
81
Considering the price deregulation in the market and current legislation, as of January 1,
2002 the Petroleum and Alcohol Account is no longer used to reimburse expenses related to the
supply of oil products and fuel alcohol to us and third parties. The movements in the account for
periods after 2002 relate only to (i) payments and adjustments mandated by the Agência Nacional do
Petróleo ANP with no impact on the income statement and (ii) adjustments resulting from the
audit of the account by the ANP.
The ANP/STN Integrated Audit Committee submitted, on June 23, 2004, its final report
certifying and approving the balance of the Petroleum and Alcohol account. The conclusion of this
audit process for the Petroleum and Alcohol account establishes the basis for concluding the
settlement process between the Brazilian government and us.
As defined in Law No. 10,742 dated October 06, 2003, the settlement of the Petroleum and
Alcohol account with the Brazilian government should have been completed by June 30, 2004. We have
been working with the Ministry of Mines and Energy MME and Secretary of the National Treasury
STN in order to resolve remaining issues necessary to conclude the settlement process.
To facilitate the required settlement, on June 30, 1998, the Brazilian government issued
National Treasury Bonds-Series H to us, representing the credit owed to us by the Brazilian
government from the Petroleum and Alcohol Account. The bonds were placed with a federal depositary
to support the balance of this account.
The National Treasury Bonds-Series H matured on June 30, 2004. As of June 30, 2004, there were
138,791 National Treasure Bonds-Series H outstanding in the amount of U.S.$56 million against the
balance of the Petroleum and Alcohol Account was U.S.$241 million. On July 2, 2004, the Brazilian
Government made a deposit in an account in our name of U.S.$56 million for payment of the bonds.
However, only U.S.$3 million of this amount was made available to us. We do not have access to the
remaining U.S.$53 million, which represent a partial guarantee of the balance of the Petroleum and
Alcohol Account, according to the determination of the Secretaria do Tesouro Nacional (STN). The
legal, valid and binding nature of the account is not affected by any difference between the
balance of the account and the value of the outstanding bonds.
The remaining balance of the Petroleum and Alcohol account may be paid as follows: (1)
National Treasury Bonds issued at the same amount as the final balance of the Petroleum and Alcohol
account; (2) offset of the balance of the Petroleum and Alcohol account, with any other amount we
owed to the Brazilian Government, including taxes; or (3) by a combination of the above options.
The following table summarizes the changes in the Petroleum and Alcohol Account for 2006, 2005
and 2004:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars) |
Opening balance |
|
$ |
329 |
|
|
$ |
282 |
|
|
$ |
239 |
|
Reimbursements to Petrobras: transport of oil products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Financial income |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Results of certification/audit process conducted by
the Brazilian government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Partial settlement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Translation gain (loss)(1) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
368 |
|
|
$ |
329 |
|
|
$ |
282 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Exchange rate translation gains (losses) are recorded as a component of cumulative
translation adjustments. |
The U.S.$39 million increase in the balance of the Petroleum and Alcohol Account during
2006 was primarily a result of the 10.7% appreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar.
82
Exploration and Development Regulation
During the time we had a government-granted monopoly in Brazil for oil and gas operations, we
had the right to exploit all production, exploration and development areas in Brazil. When
government-granted monopoly was terminated, the Brazilian government was allowed to contract with
any state or privately owned company for the development of the upstream and downstream segments of
the Brazilian oil and gas sector. Before establishing bidding rounds for concessions, the Brazilian
government granted us the exclusive right to exploit crude oil reserves where we had previously
commenced operations. In 1998, the ANP started to conduct bidding rounds to grant concessions for
production, exploration and development areas, and we were required to compete for concessions.
With the effectiveness of the Oil Law and the regulations promulgated by the ANP thereunder,
concessionaires are required to pay the government the following:
|
|
|
signature bonuses; |
|
|
|
|
rentals for the occupation or retention of areas; |
|
|
|
|
special participation; and |
|
|
|
|
royalties. |
The minimum signature bonuses are published in the bidding rules for the concessions being
auctioned, but the actual amount is based on the amount of the winning bid and must be paid upon
the execution of the concession agreement.
Rentals for the occupation and retention of the concession areas are determined for in the
related bidding rules and are payable annually. For purposes of calculating rentals, the ANP takes
into consideration factors such as the location and size of the relevant concession block, the
sedimentary basin and its geological characteristics.
Special participation is an extraordinary charge we, and all other concessionaires, must pay
in the event of high production volumes and/or profitability from oil fields, according to criteria
established by applicable regulation, and is payable on a quarterly basis for each field from the
date on which extraordinary production occurs. This participation rate, whenever it is due, varies
between 0% and 40% depending on:
|
|
|
volume of production; and |
|
|
|
|
whether the block is onshore or offshore and, if offshore, whether it is shallow or deep water. |
Under the Oil Law and applicable regulations, the special participation is calculated based
upon quarterly net revenues of each field, which consist of gross revenues calculated using
reference prices published by the ANP (reflecting international prices and the exchange rate) less:
|
|
|
royalties paid; |
|
|
|
|
investment in exploration; |
|
|
|
|
operational costs; and |
|
|
|
|
depreciation adjustments and applicable taxes. |
The ANP is also responsible for determining monthly royalties payable with respect to
production. Royalties generally correspond to a percentage ranging between 5% and 10% applied to
reference prices for oil or natural gas, as established in the relevant bidding guidelines (edital
de licitação) and concession contract (contrato de concessão). Virtually all of our production
currently pays the maximum 10% rate. In determining the royalties applicable to a particular
concession block, the ANP takes into consideration, among other factors, the geological risks
involved and the production levels expected.
83
The Oil Law also requires concessionaires of onshore fields to pay to the owner of the land a
special participation fee that varies between 0.5% and 1.0% of the net operating revenues derived
from the production of the field.
Environmental Regulations
All phases of the crude oil and natural gas business present environmental risks and hazards.
Our facilities in Brazil are subject to a wide range of federal, state and local laws, regulations
and permit requirements relating to the protection of human health and the environment. At the
federal level, our offshore activities and those which involve more than one state of the
Federation are subject to the regulatory authority of the Conselho Nacional do Meio Ambiente
(National Council for the Environment) and to the administrative authority of the Brazilian
Institute for the Environment and Renewable Natural Resources, or IBAMA, which issues operating or
drilling licenses. Maintenance of the licenses requires the submission of reports, including safety
and pollution monitoring reports (IOPP) to IBAMA. Onshore environmental, health and safety
conditions are controlled at the state rather than federal level. Law No. 6,938 of August 31, 1981,
and subsequent regulations and decrees established strict liability for environmental damage,
mechanisms for enforcement of environmental standards and licensing requirements for polluting
activities.
CONAMAs Resolution No. 23 of 1994 requires us to conduct environmental studies in connection
with a number of our activities. We must eliminate, mitigate, or compensate relevant parties for
any adverse environmental effects identified through these studies.
On December 27, 2000, Law No. 10,165, modifying Law No. 6,938, created the Taxa de Controle e
Fiscalização Ambiental (Environmental Control and Inspection Tax, or TCFA). The law empowers IBAMA
to collect, on a quarterly basis, certain fees from us and other companies that meet a minimum
revenue threshold, are engaged in potentially environmentally damaging activities and/or are
exploiting natural resources within Brazil. At present, we do not consider this fee imposed by
IBAMA to be material. The Confederação Nacional da Indústria (Brazilian Industry Confederation, or
CNI) is currently challenging the constitutionality of these fees in the Brazilian Supreme Court
(Supremo Tribunal Federal, or STF).
Brazilian environmental laws and regulations provide for restrictions and prohibitions on
spills and releases or emissions of various hazardous substances produced in association with our
operations. Brazilian environmental laws and regulations also govern the operation, maintenance,
abandonment and reclamation of wells, refineries, terminals, service stations and other facilities.
Compliance with these laws and regulations can require significant expenditures, and violations may
result in fines and penalties, some of which may be material. In addition, operations and
undertakings that have a significant environmental impact, especially the drilling of new wells and
expansion of refineries, require us to apply for environmental impact assessments in accordance
with federal and state licensing procedures. In accordance with Brazilian environmental laws, we
have proposed the execution of, or we have entered into, environmental commitment agreements with
the environmental protection agencies and/or the federal or state public ministries, in which we
agree to undertake certain measures in order to complete the environmental licensing for several of
our operating facilities.
Under Law No. 9,605 of February 12, 1998, individuals or entities whose conduct or activities
cause harm to the environment are subject to criminal and administrative sanctions, as well as any
costs to repair the actual
damages resulting from such harm. Individuals or legal entities that commit a crime against
the environment are subject to penalties and sanctions that range from fines to imprisonment, for
individuals, or, suspension or interruption of activities or prohibition to enter into any
contracts with governmental bodies for up to ten years for legal entities. The government
environmental protection agencies may also impose administrative sanctions on those who do not
comply with the environmental laws and regulations, including, among others:
|
|
|
fines; |
|
|
|
|
partial or total suspension of activities; |
|
|
|
|
obligations to fund recovery works and environmental projects; |
|
|
|
|
forfeiture or restriction of tax incentives or benefits; |
84
|
|
|
closing of the establishments or undertakings; and |
|
|
|
|
forfeiture or suspension of participation in credit lines with official credit establishments. |
Under Law No. 9,966 of 2000, entities operating organized ports and port installations and
owners or operators of platforms and its support installations must perform independent
environmental audits every two years, with a view to evaluating the environmental management and
control systems in their units. We are in full compliance with this law.
Law No. 9,985 of July 19, 2000 establishes an environmental compensation of at least 0.5% of
the value of a project relating to activities that have a negative environmental impact that cannot
be mitigated. This compensation may only be applied in conservation units, as defined by the
Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação da Natureza (the National System of Nature Conservation
Units, or the SNUC). Environmental agencies are still implementing this law, but they may attempt
to apply it in a retroactive manner.
In 2006, we invested approximately U.S.$645 million in environmental projects as compared to
approximately U.S.$521 million in 2005. These investments were primarily directed at reducing
emissions and wastes resulting from industrial processes, managing water use and effluents,
remedying impacted areas, implementing new environmental technologies and upgrading our pipelines.
In March 2006, the Brazilian Congress enacted Law No. 11,284, which, among other things,
creates the concept of environmental insurance as an economic policy instrument. Brazilian
companies will be required to purchase environmental insurance only once the Brazilian Congress
approves a new law to regulate Law No. 11,284 that expressly creates this obligation. We do not
know the terms and conditions under which environmental insurance will be contracted in the future
and, therefore, we cannot estimate whether the requirement to purchase environmental insurance will
have a material adverse effect in our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are subject to a number of administrative proceedings and civil and criminal claims
relating to environmental matters. See Item 8. Financial Information Legal
ProceedingsEnvironmental Claims.
Health, Safety and Environmental Initiatives
Initiatives
The protection of human health and the environment is one of our primary concerns, and is
essential to our success as an integrated energy company. In order to address and prioritize
health, safety and environmental concerns and ensure compliance with environmental regulations, we
have:
|
|
|
developed the PEGASO program to upgrade our pipelines and other equipment, implement
new technologies, improve our emergency response readiness, reduce emissions and
residues and prevent environmental accidents. From April 2000 to December 2006, we
spent approximately U.S.$4.081 billion under this program, including the Programa de
Integridade de Dutos (Pipeline Integrity
Program) through which we conduct inspections of, and improvements to, our pipelines. In
2006, we spent approximately U.S.$562 million in connection with the PEGASO program; |
|
|
|
|
proposed the execution of, or entered into, environmental commitment agreements with
several environmental protection agencies and/or the federal or state public
ministries, in which we agree to undertake certain measures in order to complete the
environmental licensing for several of our operating facilities; |
|
|
|
|
integrated our corporate health department into the already existing corporate
environment and safety department, thereby facilitating the development of systematic,
company-wide procedures to handle concerns related to health, safety and the
environment, or HSE; |
85
|
|
|
established our new HSE policy and corporate guidelines, which focus on principles
of sustainable development, compliance with legislation and the availability and use of
environmental performance indicators; |
|
|
|
|
undertook capital investments to reduce the HSE risk of our operations, including
making improvements to our refineries and transportation facilities and developing and
implementing oil pollution prevention guidelines; |
|
|
|
|
built nine environmental protection centers and seven advanced bases for oil spill
prevention, control and response, established local and regional, onshore and offshore
contingency plans involving public services and communities to deal with oil spills,
and chartered three dedicated oil spill recovery vessels (OSRVs) fully equipped for oil
spill control and fire fighting; |
|
|
|
|
received HSE integrated management certificates for our operating units. As of
December 2006, Petrobras owned 34 certificates for its operating units in Brazil and 20
for units abroad. These certificates acknowledge the compliance of our HSE management
system with ISO 14001 (environment) and OHSAS 18001 (health and safety) standards.
Because some of those certificates cover more than one site, the total number of
certified sites is 159 in Brazil and 20 abroad. The Frota Nacional de Petroleiros
(National Fleet of Vessels) has been fully certified by the IMO International
Management Code for Safe Operation of Ships and for Pollution Prevention (ISM Code)
since December 1997; |
|
|
|
|
implemented through the Programa de Segurança de Processo (Process Safety Program)
standardized, company-wide guidelines for HSE management, for effectively investigating
incidents and for strengthening our institutional commitment to HSE through employee
training. The HSE Management Manual developed through that program is a day-to-day
management tool currently being applied in all of our operating units; |
|
|
|
|
implemented the Excellence in Health, Safety and Environment Project, included in
our Strategic Agenda, which, through actions already defined in all of our business and
services segments and in our subsidiaries, seeks to ensure that by 2015, we reach the
same level of performance as measured by safety, environmental and health indices as
the leading oil, Gas and Power companies in the world; |
|
|
|
|
developed an Air Emissions Management System, in conjunction with an international
consulting company, for our operations in Brazil and South America. The system gathers
information about emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, carbon monoxide, the
main greenhouse gases (carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide), volatile organic
compounds (VOCs) and particulate material, allowing us to improve the management of our
emissions. We have registered our 2004 Annual Emissions Summary in the Global
Greenhouse Gas Register of the World Economic Forum. The report gathers data provided
by the Air Emissions Management System and is available for public access through the
Forums website; |
|
|
|
|
established a corporate goal, included in our Balanced Scorecard, for avoiding
emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG). Considering the projects included in our 2007-2011
Business Plan,, we aim
to cut 18.5 million tons of GHG emissions through 2011, by implementing projects that
may also be eligible for the Clean Development Mechanism of the Kyoto Protocol; |
|
|
|
|
participated in negotiations conducted by the Brazilian Ministry of Mines and Energy
of new regulations of environmental compensation related to the implementation of new
projects; |
|
|
|
|
participated with the Brazilian Ministry of Mines and Energy and IBAMA in a
governmental follow-up group created to supervise the implementation of the new planned
gas pipelines and oil and gas production projects; |
|
|
|
|
participated regularly in the discussion agenda of the Brazilian Ministry of Mines
and Energy and the Ministry of the Environment about environmental issues affecting our
business; and |
86
|
|
|
participated directly in discussions with the Ministry of the Environment and IBAMA
regarding issues that could affect Petrobras business. |
In addition, we conduct environmental studies for all new projects as required by Brazilian
environmental legislation, and our HSE department evaluates each and every project with a total
budget exceeding U.S$25 million to confirm its compliance with all HSE requirements and adoption of
the best HSE practices throughout the projects life cycle.
We will continue to evaluate and develop initiatives to address HSE concerns and to reduce our
exposure to HSE risks.
Our Executive Board has approved the building of three biodiesel production plants, with a
total capacity of 150,000 tons per year. The three plants will demand an investment of about
U.S.$90.5 million each and are expected to begin operations in December of 2007.
We have bought 70,000 cubic meters of biodiesel, certified with the social fuel label, to be
delivered throughout 2006. Social fuel is fuel manufactured under a government program designed to
promote family-run agricultural enterprises.
In 2006, BR purchased an interest in Brazil small hydroelectric plants for a total value of
R$74.6 million, to hold a 49% participation. This allowed the distribution of 13 small
hydroelectric plants throughout the states of Minas Gerais, Espírito Santo, Rio de Janeiro, Goiás
and Mato Grosso do Sul, with an aggregate power potential of 291 MW.
An additional undertaking in this area is our participation in two other small hydroelectric
plants through our affiliate, Termoeléctrica Potiguar S.A.: Clean Water and Air. Together, the two
allow for 25.4 MW of power potential.
The 15 small hydroelectric plants are linked to PROINFA, the Brazilian Governments Incentive
Program of Brazilian Government for Alternative Energy Sources.
Management
We have an HSE Management Committee, which was created by our executive officers to ensure
that HSE issues are addressed throughout the company. The committee is composed of executive
managers of our different business segments and of directors of our controlled companies, BR
Distribuidora and Transpetro. The work of the HSE Management Committee is supported by three
permanent subcommittees and by temporary commissions and work groups, each one responsible for a
specific HSE issue, such as licensing and environmental compensation, emissions and climate change,
operational risk assessment, management of change, new projects and health management.
We have also created an Environmental Committee, which is composed of three members of our
Board of Directors. The committee is responsible for, among other things: (1) overseeing and
managing environmental and work safety issues affecting us; (2) establishing measurable
environmental targets and ensuring compliance; and (3)
recommending changes in environmental, health and safety policy, if necessary, to our Board of
Directors. The Environmental Committee charter is still subject to approval by our Board of
Directors.
Competition
As a result of the regulatory reform of the oil and gas industry in Brazil, we expect to face
increasing competition both in our downstream and upstream operations.
In the exploration and production segment, the Brazilian governments auction process for new
exploratory areas has enabled multinational and regional oil and gas companies to begin exploring
for crude oil in Brazil. If these companies discover crude oil in commercial quantities and are
able to develop it economically, we expect that competition with our own production will increase.
87
In the past, we have faced little competition as a result of the prevailing laws that
effectively gave us a monopoly. With the end of this monopoly and regulatory reform, other
participants may now explore, produce, transport and distribute oil products in Brazil. As a
result, some participants have already begun importing refined oil products, which will compete
with oil products from our Brazilian refineries, as well as the oil products we currently import.
We now have to compete with global imports at international prices. We expect that this additional
competition may affect the prices we can charge for our oil products, which in turn will affect the
profit we can make. We estimate that we had a market share of approximately 98.1% in the Brazilian
oil production segment in 2006. We do not have meaningful competitors in the oil production segment
in Brazil. In the oil exploration segment, we estimate that the exploration activities conducted
solely by us represented approximately 72% (number of exploration wells we drilled solely compared
to the total number of exploration wells drilled in Brazil in 2006) of the Brazilian oil
exploration market in 2006 and the exploration activities conducted by us in conjunction with other
partners represented approximately 86% (number of exploration wells we drilled solely and with
partners compared to the number of exploration wells drilled in Brazil in 2006) of the oil
exploration market in Brazil in 2005. Our main competitors in the oil exploration segment are Agip,
Devon, Shell, Maersk, Statoil, Chevron Texaco, Encana, El Paso and BG Group. We also expect
continued competition in our distribution segment, where we currently face the most significant
competition of any of our business segments. In particular, we face competition from small
distributors, many of which have been able, and may continue to be able, to avoid paying sales
taxes and mix their gasoline with inexpensive solvents, enabling them to sell gasoline at prices
below ours. We had a market share of approximately 42.6% in the Brazilian oil products distribution
segment according to Sindicom, a Brazilian industry association of oil and gas distribution
companies. Our main competitors in this segment are Shell, Esso and Texaco.
In the natural gas and power segment, we expect competition from new entrants that are
acquiring interests in natural gas distribution and gas-fired power generation companies, and
existing competitors that are expanding operations in order to consolidate their position in
Brazil. We had a market share of approximately 94.3% in the Brazilian natural gas segment based on
2006 volumes sold to the Local Distribution Companies and total natural gas market, according to
the Associação Brasileira das Empresas de Gás Natural (the Brazilian Society of Natural Gas
Companies, or ABEGÁS).
In the international segment, we plan to continue expanding operations, although we expect to
face continuing competition in the areas in which we are already active, including the Gulf of
Mexico, Africa and the Southern Cone. We have already become a major player in some of the
countries in which we have international operations. In Argentina, we estimate that we have a
market share of 13.5% for auto fuel and 12.3% for lubricants. In Bolivia, we have a market share
of 92% of the oil refining market, 0.3% of the fuel market, and 72% of lubricants.
Insurance
Our insurance programs principally focus on the concentration of risks and the importance and
replacement value of assets. Under our risk management policy, risks associated with our principal
assets, such as refineries, tankers, our fleet and offshore production and drilling platforms, are
insured for their replacement value with third-party Brazilian insurers. Although the policies are
issued in Brazil, most of our policies are reinsured abroad with reinsurers rated A- or higher by
Standard & Poors rating agency or B+ or higher by A.M. Best. Substantially all of our
international operations are insured or reinsured by our Bermudian subsidiary Bear Insurance
Company Limited following exactly the same rating criteria.
Less valuable assets, such as small auxiliary boats, certain storage facilities, and some
administrative installations, are self-insured. We do not maintain coverage for business
interruption, except for a minority of our international operations. We also do not maintain
coverage for our wells for substantially all of our Brazilian operations.
We maintain coverage for operational third-party liability with respect to our onshore and
offshore activities, including environmental risks such as oil spills. The insurance policy covers
any damage resulting from either our or our affiliates activities, with the exception of our
international activities, which have their own insurance and are therefore not included in this
policy. In Brazil, our coverage in this policy is of up to U.S.$220 million per accident in the
aggregate (fines imposed by government authorities are not covered). In case of an accident, this
coverage may not be sufficient to compensate us for losses incurred. Although we do not insure most
88
of our pipelines, we have insurance against damage or loss resulting from specific incidents, as
well as oil pollution from our pipelines. Our fleet and most of our Mobile Offshore Units are
entered in Protection and Indemnity Insurance mutuals (P&I Clubs), that provide collective
self-insurance to their members against third party liabilities and expenses arising from owning
ships or operating ships as principals.
We also maintain coverage for risks associated with transportation, hull and machinery risk
and directors and officers (D&O) insurance coverage. All projects and installations under
construction are insured in compliance with the terms of the relevant financing agreements, usually
through a performance bond in connection with completion of the contract and/or other damage and
liability insurance. All projects and installations under construction that have an estimated
maximum loss above U.S.$40 million are covered by a construction policy.
The premium for renewing our property risk insurance policy for a 12-month period commencing
June 2006 was U.S$34.5 million. This represented an increase of 17% over the preceding 12-month
period. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the insured value of our assets, which in
the same period, increased by 32%, from U.S.$32.7 billion to U.S$43.2 billion. Since 2001, our risk
retention has increased and our deductibles may reach U.S.$40 million in certain cases.
Our facilities are regularly subject to risk surveys undertaken by international risk
consultants. The reports and recommendations prepared in these surveys are released to our insurers
and underwriters, as well as the actions taken by us to meet these recommendations. All the
significant accidents and their causes, as well as the improvements we make to our HSE standards
are periodically released to the public.
ITEM 5. OPERATING AND FINANCIAL REVIEW AND PROSPECTS .
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Petrobras Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations
together with our audited consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes beginning on
page F-1 of this annual report.
Overview
We earn income from:
|
|
|
domestic sales, which consist of sales of oil products (such as diesel oil,
gasoline, jet fuel, naphtha, fuel oil and liquefied petroleum gas), natural gas,
electricity and petrochemical products; |
|
|
|
|
export sales, which consist primarily of sales of crude oil and oil products; |
|
|
|
|
international sales (excluding export sales), which consist of sales of crude oil,
natural gas and oil products that are purchased, produced and refined abroad; and |
|
|
|
|
other sources, including services, investment income and foreign exchange gains. |
Our expenses include:
|
|
|
costs of sales (which are composed of labor expenses, costs of operating and
purchases of crude oil and oil products); maintaining and repairing property, plants
and equipment; depreciation and amortization of fixed assets; depletion of oil fields;
and costs of exploration; |
|
|
|
|
selling (which include expenses for transportation and distribution of our
products), general and administrative expenses; and |
|
|
|
|
interest expense, monetary and foreign exchange losses. |
Fluctuations in our financial condition and results of operations are driven by a combination
of factors, including:
89
|
|
|
the volume of crude oil, oil products and natural gas we produce and sell; |
|
|
|
|
changes in international prices of crude oil and oil products, which are denominated in U.S. dollars; |
|
|
|
|
related changes in the domestic prices of crude oil and oil products, which are
denominated in reais; |
|
|
|
|
fluctuations in the real/U.S. dollar and Argentine peso/U.S. dollar exchange rates; |
|
|
|
|
Brazilian political and economic conditions; and |
|
|
|
|
the amount in taxes and duties that we are required to pay with respect to our
operations, by virtue of our status as a Brazilian company and our involvement in the
oil and gas industry. |
Sales Volumes and Prices
The profitability of our operations in any particular accounting period is related to the
sales volume of, and prices for, the crude oil, oil products and natural gas that we sell. Our
consolidated net sales in 2006 totaled approximately 1,104,723 million barrels of crude oil
equivalent, representing U.S.$72,347 million in net operating revenues, as compared to
approximately 1,025,033 million barrels of crude oil equivalent, representing U.S.$56,324 million
in net operating revenues, as compared to approximately 989,719 million barrels of crude oil
equivalent, representing U.S.$38,428 million in net operating revenues in 2004.
As a vertically integrated company, we process most of our crude oil production in our
refineries and sell the refined oil products primarily in the Brazilian domestic market. Therefore,
it is oil product prices, rather than crude oil prices, that most directly affect our financial
results. Nonetheless, as crude oil production increases, and as exports increase, the increase in
crude oil production will have a greater relative importance.
Oil product prices vary over time as the result of many factors, including the price of crude
oil. The average prices of Brent crude, an international benchmark oil, were approximately
U.S.$65.14 per barrel in 2006, U.S.$54.38 per barrel in 2005 and U.S.$38.21 per barrel for 2004.
For December 2006, Brent crude oil prices averaged U.S.$62.33 per barrel. For the first quarter of
2007, although crude oil prices have been showing some volatility, they are also maintaining the
level of U.S.$60.00 per barrel.
Domestic Sales Volumes and Prices
During 2006, approximately 69.7% of our net operating revenues were derived from sales of
crude oil and oil products in Brazil, as compared to 72.4% in 2005 and 73.2% in 2004. As export
volumes of crude oil and oil products have increased, domestic sales as a percentage of net
operating revenues have declined.
Our revenues are principally derived from sales in Brazil. The following table sets forth our
domestic sales by volume of oil products, natural gas and fuel alcohol for each of 2006, 2005 and
2004:
90
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Operating |
|
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
Volume |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
(Mbbl, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Mbbl, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Mbbl, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
except as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
except as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
except as |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
otherwise |
|
|
(U.S.$) |
|
|
(U.S.$ in |
|
|
otherwise |
|
|
(U.S.$) |
|
|
(U.S.$ in |
|
|
otherwise |
|
|
(U.S.$) |
|
|
(U.S.$ in |
|
|
|
noted) |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
millions) |
|
|
noted) |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
millions) |
|
|
noted) |
|
|
(1) |
|
|
millions) |
|
Energy products: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automotive gasoline |
|
|
112,541 |
|
|
|
73.86 |
|
|
|
8,312 |
|
|
|
104,901 |
|
|
$ |
60.08 |
|
|
$ |
6,302 |
|
|
|
100,712 |
|
|
$ |
41.58 |
|
|
$ |
4,188 |
|
Diesel |
|
|
245,159 |
|
|
|
83.65 |
|
|
|
20,507 |
|
|
|
242,831 |
|
|
|
68.20 |
|
|
|
16,561 |
|
|
|
240,237 |
|
|
|
44.64 |
|
|
|
10,725 |
|
Fuel oil |
|
|
36,340 |
|
|
|
47.47 |
|
|
|
1,725 |
|
|
|
36,243 |
|
|
|
40.81 |
|
|
|
1,479 |
|
|
|
39,654 |
|
|
|
28.45 |
|
|
|
1,128 |
|
Liquid petroleum gas |
|
|
73,382 |
|
|
|
36.00 |
|
|
|
2,642 |
|
|
|
77,891 |
|
|
|
34.55 |
|
|
|
2,691 |
|
|
|
76,982 |
|
|
|
28.14 |
|
|
|
2,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total energy products |
|
|
467,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,186 |
|
|
|
461,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,033 |
|
|
|
457,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,207 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-energy products: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petrochemical naphtha |
|
|
60,197 |
|
|
|
63.31 |
|
|
|
3,811 |
|
|
|
57,281 |
|
|
|
53.49 |
|
|
|
3,064 |
|
|
|
57,595 |
|
|
|
42.28 |
|
|
|
2,435 |
|
Others |
|
|
96,369 |
|
|
|
63.09 |
|
|
|
6,080 |
|
|
|
80,953 |
|
|
|
58.35 |
|
|
|
4,724 |
|
|
|
77,652 |
|
|
|
41.96 |
|
|
|
3,258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-energy products |
|
|
156,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,891 |
|
|
|
138,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,788 |
|
|
|
135,247 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,693 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel alcohol |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
67.80 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
23.81 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
455 |
|
|
|
30.77 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Natural gas (BOE) |
|
|
88,839 |
|
|
|
26.27 |
|
|
|
2,334 |
|
|
|
83,090 |
|
|
|
21.77 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
77,310 |
|
|
|
18.61 |
|
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-total |
|
|
712,886 |
|
|
|
63.71 |
|
|
|
45,415 |
|
|
|
683,316 |
|
|
|
53.61 |
|
|
|
36,633 |
|
|
|
670,597 |
|
|
|
37.81 |
|
|
|
25,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distribution net sales |
|
|
204,649 |
|
|
|
91.46 |
|
|
|
18,718 |
|
|
|
201,347 |
|
|
|
78.53 |
|
|
|
15,811 |
|
|
|
182,327 |
|
|
|
57.36 |
|
|
|
10,458 |
|
Intercompany net sales |
|
|
(195,903 |
) |
|
|
69.89 |
|
|
|
(13,692 |
) |
|
|
(187,268 |
) |
|
|
62.22 |
|
|
|
(11,651 |
) |
|
|
(164,730 |
) |
|
|
46.69 |
|
|
|
(7,692 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total domestic market |
|
|
721,632 |
|
|
|
69.90 |
|
|
|
50,441 |
|
|
|
697,395 |
|
|
|
58.49 |
|
|
|
40,793 |
|
|
|
688,194 |
|
|
|
40.86 |
|
|
|
28,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Export net sales |
|
|
259,630 |
|
|
|
55.39 |
|
|
|
14,381 |
|
|
|
187,008 |
|
|
|
47.80 |
|
|
|
8,938 |
|
|
|
186,221 |
|
|
|
31.81 |
|
|
|
5,923 |
|
International net sales |
|
|
73,363 |
|
|
|
62.72 |
|
|
|
4,601 |
|
|
|
64,860 |
|
|
|
48.41 |
|
|
|
3,140 |
|
|
|
83,800 |
|
|
|
33.89 |
|
|
|
2,840 |
|
Others |
|
|
50,098 |
|
|
|
47.87 |
|
|
|
2,398 |
|
|
|
75,770 |
|
|
|
40,09 |
|
|
|
3,038 |
|
|
|
31,504 |
|
|
|
39.17 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sub-Total |
|
|
383,091 |
|
|
|
55.81 |
|
|
|
21,380 |
|
|
|
327,638 |
|
|
|
46.14 |
|
|
|
15,116 |
|
|
|
301,525 |
|
|
|
33.15 |
|
|
|
9,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net sales |
|
|
1,104,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,347 |
|
|
|
1,025,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
56,324 |
|
|
|
989,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
38,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Net average price calculated by dividing net sales by the volume for the year. |
During 2006, we did not announce any increases in our prices for gasoline and diesel in
the domestic market.
Export Sales Volumes and Prices
While our principal market is the Brazilian market, as our domestic production of crude oil
has increased, we have begun to export greater amounts of crude oil and oil products that exceed
Brazilian demand. We also export volumes of domestically produced heavy crude oil that our
refineries are unable to process operationally or economically. See Item 4. Information on the
CompanyRefining, Transportation and Marketing. Our export volumes of crude oil and oil products
totaled 212,210 million barrels of crude oil equivalent in 2006, as compared to 187,007 million
barrels of crude oil equivalent in 2005 and to 186,221 million barrels of crude oil equivalent in
2004. We base our crude oil export prices on international prices, as adjusted to reflect specific
market conditions. We determine export prices of our oil products and natural gas by reference to
market conditions, as well as direct negotiations with our clients. As a result of an increase in
average prices and volume of export sales of crude oil and oil products, the total value of our
crude oil and oil product exports (measured on a free-on-board basis) in 2006 was U.S.$14,381
million, as compared to U.S.$8,938 million in 2005 and to U.S.$5,923 million in 2004, representing
approximately 19.9% of our net operating revenues in 2006, as compared to 15.9% in 2005 and 15.4%
in 2004. See Item 4. Information on the CompanyRefining, Transportation and Marketing-Exports.
International Volumes and Prices
We produce, refine, transport, distribute and market crude oil and natural gas
internationally. Sales from production outside Brazil to sources outside Brazil were U.S.$2,398
million in 2006, U.S.$3,038 million in 2005 and U.S.$2,840 million in 2004, representing
approximately 3.3% of our net operating revenues in 2006, as compared to 5.4% of our net operating
revenues in 2005 and to 7.4% in 2004. We expect our international sales to
91
continue growing as our international production continues to grow and we increase our
refining and distribution capacity abroad. See Item 4. Information on the CompanyInternational.
Import Purchase Volumes and Prices
We continue to import lighter crude oil for blending in our own refineries, as well as smaller
quantities of diesel, liquefied petroleum gas, naphtha and other oil products, to attend the demand
of the Brazilian retail market. We have continuously upgraded our refineries to handle heavier
crude oil in order to reduce our purchases of imported crude oil and oil products by refining a
greater portion of our heavier crude oil production. The upgrade in our refineries mentioned above
has increased the margin between our net operating revenues and cost of goods sold, since it is
less expensive to produce crude oil domestically than it is to import crude oil. In 2006, the net
margin decreased to 17.7% as compared to 18.4% in 2005, as a result of an increase in imported
crude oil to 370 Mbpd in 2006 from 352 Mbpd in 2005. The increase in the importation of lighter
crude oils is in line with the strategy of international marketing operations, which make the
importing of lighter crude oils rather than middle distillates more feasible.
Prior to December 31, 2001, we were the only company permitted to import oil products to
supply the Brazilian markets demand for these products. Now that other parties are permitted by
law to import oil products and supply the market, we continue to reevaluate our strategy in order
to achieve optimal levels of imports for our profitability. We imported a total of 43.1 million
barrels of oil products in 2006, as compared to 34.8 million barrels of oil products in 2005 and to
40.1 million barrels of oil products in 2004. See Item 4. Information on the CompanyRefining,
Transportation and Marketing-Imports.
Effect of Taxes on our Income
General
In addition to taxes paid on behalf of consumers to federal, state and municipal governments,
such as the Imposto sobre Circulação de Mercadorias e Serviços, or ICMS, we are required to pay
three principal charges on our oil production activities in Brazil:
|
|
|
Royalties, which generally correspond to a percentage between 5% and 10% of
production, are calculated based on a reference price for crude oil or natural gas, and
will thus vary with the international price of crude oil. The ANP also takes into
account the geological risks involved, and productivity levels expected, with respect
to a particular concession. Virtually all of our crude oil production is currently
taxed at the maximum royalty rate. |
|
|
|
|
Special Participation, which applies to our larger, more profitable fields, and
ranges from 0% to 40% depending on the volumes of crude oil produced in the fields, the
location of the fields (including whether they are onshore or offshore), water depth
and number of years that the field has been in production, and the quality of the oil
that is produced. In 2006, the tax was charged on 19 of our fields, including Marlim,
Albacora, Roncador, Leste do Urucu, Rio Urucu, Canto do Amaro, Marimbá, Marlim Sul,
Namorado, Carapeba, Pampo, Albacora Leste, Barracuda, Caratinga, Cherne, Pilar, Fazenda
Alegre, Miranga and Carmópolis. The tax is based on net revenues of a field, which
consists of gross revenues less royalties paid, investments in exploration, operational
costs and depreciation adjustments and applicable taxes. The Special Participation Tax
uses as a reference international oil prices converted to reais at the current exchange
rate. |
|
|
|
|
Retention Bonus, which is a tax payable on those concessions that are available for
exploration and production, and is calculated at a rate established by the ANP, taking
into consideration factors such as the location and size of the relevant concession
block, the sedimentary basin and its geological characteristics. |
These charges imposed by the Brazilian government are included in our cost of goods sold. In
addition, we are subject to tax on our income at an effective rate of 25% and a social contribution
tax at an effective rate of 9%, the standard corporate tax rate in Brazil. See Note 3 to our
audited consolidated financial statements.
92
Potential Change in ICMS Legislation
In June 2003, the State of Rio de Janeiro enacted a law (State Law nº 4.117, dated June, 27th,
2003, also known as Noel Law) imposing the ICMS on upstream activities. The law was regulated by
Decree nº 34.761, dated February 3, 2004, which was suspended by Decree nº 34.783 of February 4th,
2004, for an undetermined period of time. Nevertheless, the State of Rio de Janeiro may choose to
enforce the law at any time.
The constitutionality of this law is currently being challenged. The claim was filed by the
Federal Prosecutor and the Attorney General has given a favorable legal opinion. The Supreme Court
provisionally did not suspend the effectiveness of the law.
In accordance with legislation currently in force, the ICMS for fuels derived from oil is
assessed at the point of sale but not at the wellhead level. As a result, the tax is mainly
collected in the states where the sales of fuels are made. If the State of Rio de Janeiro enforces
the new law, it is unlikely that the other states would allow us to use the tax imposed at the
wellhead level in Rio de Janeiro as a credit to offset the tax imposed at the sale level.
Therefore, we would have to pay ICMS at both levels, unless we are successful in challenging this
tax in court. If the Supreme Court decides that this law is constitutional, our ability to
challenge the payment of ICMS at both levels will depend on the ground of the Supreme Courts
decision.
We estimate the amount of ICMS that we would be required to pay to the State of Rio de Janeiro
could increase by approximately R$9.4 billion (U.S.$4.3 billion) per year as a result of this
change in legislation. This increase could have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations and financial condition.
Financial Income and Expense
We derive financial income from several sources, including interest on cash and cash
equivalents. The majority of our cash equivalents are short-term Brazilian government securities,
including securities indexed to the U.S. dollar. We also hold U.S. dollar deposits.
Our financial income was U.S.$1,165 million in 2006, U.S.$710 million in 2005 and U.S.$956
million in 2004.
We incur financial expenses from short and long-term debt denominated in U.S. dollars, reais
and other currencies. Our financial expenses were U.S.$1,340 million in 2006, U.S.$1,189 million in
2005 and U.S.$1,733 million in 2004. In addition, we capitalized U.S.$1,001 million in interest in
2006, as compared to U.S.$612 million in 2005 and to U.S.$267 million in 2004.
Inflation and Exchange Rate Variation
Inflation
Since the introduction of the real as the Brazilian currency in July 1994, inflation in Brazil
has remained relatively stable, although it increased markedly in 2002. Inflation was 3.8% in 2006,
1.2% in 2005 and 12.1% in 2004, as measured by the IGP-DI, a general price index. Inflation has
had, and may continue to have, effects on our financial condition and results of operations. A
large percentage of our total costs are in reais, and our suppliers and service providers generally
attempt to increase their prices to reflect Brazilian inflation. These increases are counteracted
by the adjustments that we make to our prices to offset the effects of inflation and an
appreciation of the U.S. dollar against the real.
Exchange Rate Variation
Since we adopted the real as our functional currency in 1998, fluctuations in the value of the
real against the U.S. dollar, particularly depreciations of the real had, in the past, and will
continue to have, if they reoccur, multiple effects on our results of operations. Our reporting
currency for all periods is the U.S. dollar. We maintain our financial records in reais, and
translate our statements of operations into U.S. dollars at the average rate for the period. The
amounts reported in our statements of operations in any given period will be reduced at the same
rate as the real has depreciated in relation to the U.S. dollar during that period. During 2006,
however, there was an 8.7%
93
appreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar, as compared to an appreciation of 11.8% in
2005, and an 8.1% appreciation in 2004.
Virtually all of our sales are of crude oil or oil products, which generally trade freely in
the international markets at prices expressed in U.S. dollars. From July 1998 through the end of
2001, our net operating revenues reflected changes in the U.S. dollar/real exchange rate, with a
one month delay, because the formula used by the government to set realization prices for crude oil
and oil products included adjustments based on exchange rate variations. See Item 4. Information
on the CompanyRegulation of the Oil and Gas Industry in BrazilPrice Regulation.
Since January 2, 2002, when prices were deregulated, we have been free to establish prices for
our products based on market conditions and have generally been able to maintain parity with
international prices. As a result, although substantially all of our revenues are in reais, they
have been, and continue to be, linked to U.S. dollar-based international prices. When the real
depreciates against the U.S. dollar, assuming international prices remain constant in U.S. dollars,
we may increase the prices for our products in reais, in which case our net operating revenues in
reais increase. An increase in our reais net operating revenue, however, is not reflected in our
net operating revenue when reported in U.S. dollars, when the real depreciates.
Another effect of depreciation is that our operating costs and expenses when expressed in U.S.
dollars tend to decline. This happens primarily due to the fact that a substantial portion of our
costs and operating expenses is denominated in reais. Prior to 2003, our reais-denominated costs
increased at a rate slower than the depreciation. Accordingly, the effect was to decrease costs of
locally supplied products and services when reported in U.S. dollars. The opposite effects occur
when the real appreciates against the U.S. dollar such as in 2004, 2005 and 2006. In recent
periods, the exchange rate variation has had the following additional effects, among others, on our
financial condition and results of operations:
|
|
|
We record the remeasurement effects of our non-reais denominated assets and
liabilities held in Brazil (e.g., cash, cash equivalents and financial obligations) in
our statements of income. Primarily because of our substantial liabilities denominated
in foreign currency, we recorded a U.S.$55 million net foreign exchange gain in our
2006 statement of income, as compared to a U.S.$269 million net foreign exchange gain
in 2005 and to a U.S.$368 million net foreign exchange gain in 2004. To the extent
these variations are not recognized in a transaction (such as the repayment of the debt
in the period in which there is a depreciation), the foreign exchange gain is added
back for purposes of determining our cash flow. |
|
|
|
|
Our other assets and liabilities in Brazil, primarily accounts receivable,
inventories and property, plant and equipment, cash and cash equivalents and government
securities, pension plan liabilities, health care benefits and deferred income taxes,
are all translated into U.S. dollars. Therefore, any depreciation (appreciation) of the
real against the U.S. dollar will be reflected as a reduction (gain) in the U.S. dollar
value of those assets and liabilities, charged directly to shareholders equity. These
currency translation effects are beyond our control. Accordingly, we recorded a
U.S.$3,230 million credit directly to shareholders equity in our statement of changes
in shareholders equity for 2006, without affecting net income, to reflect the
appreciation of the real against the U.S. dollar of approximately 8.7%, as compared to
a credit of U.S.$3,107 million in 2005 to reflect the appreciation of 11.8%, as
compared to a credit of U.S.$1,911 million in 2004 to reflect the appreciation of 8.1%. |
Foreign currency translation adjustments reflecting a depreciation have a significant impact
on the balance sheet of a company such as ours, whose assets are primarily denominated in reais,
but whose liabilities are primarily denominated in foreign currencies. The reductions in our asset
values charged to shareholders equity, however, do not necessarily affect our cash flows, since
our revenues and cash earnings are to a large degree linked to the U.S. dollar, and a portion of
our operating expenses are linked to the real.
The exchange rate variation also impacts the amount of retained earnings available for
distribution by us when measured in U.S. dollars. Amounts reported as available for distribution in
our statutory accounting records prepared in accordance with Brazilian accounting principles
decrease or increase when measured in U.S. dollars as the real depreciates or appreciates against
the U.S. dollar. In addition, the exchange rate variation creates foreign
94
exchange gains and losses that are included in our results of operations determined in
accordance with Brazilian accounting principles and that affect the amount of our unretained
earnings available for distribution.
Results of Operations
The differences in our operating results from year to year occur as a result of a combination
of factors, including primarily: the volume of crude oil, oil products and natural gas we produce
and sell, the price at which we sell our crude oil, oil products and natural gas and the
differential between the Brazilian inflation rate and the depreciation or appreciation of the real
against the U.S. dollar. The table below shows the amount by which each of these variables has
changed during the last three years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Crude Oil and NGL Production (Mbpd) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
1,778 |
|
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
|
1,493 |
|
International |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
Non-consolidated international production(1) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Crude Oil and NGL Production |
|
|
1,920 |
|
|
|
1,847 |
|
|
|
1,661 |
|
Change in Crude Oil and NGL Production |
|
|
4.0 |
% |
|
|
11.2 |
% |
|
|
(2.4 |
)% |
Average Sales Price for Crude (U.S.$ per bbl) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
$ |
54.71 |
|
|
$ |
45.42 |
|
|
$ |
33.49 |
|
International |
|
$ |
44.02 |
|
|
$ |
34.91 |
|
|
$ |
26.51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Production (Mmcfpd) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
1,660 |
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
1,590 |
|
International |
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
Non-consolidated international production(1) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Natural Gas Production |
|
|
2,267 |
|
|
|
2,220 |
|
|
|
2,154 |
|
Change in Natural Gas Production (sold only) |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
3.1 |
% |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
Average Sales Price for Natural Gas (U.S.$ per Mcf) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
2.61 |
|
|
|
2.17 |
|
|
|
1.93 |
|
International |
|
|
2.16 |
|
|
|
1.64 |
|
|
|
1.17 |
|
Year End Exchange Rate |
|
|
2.14 |
|
|
|
2.34 |
|
|
|
2.65 |
|
Appreciation (Depreciation) during the year(2) |
|
|
8.7 |
% |
|
|
11.8 |
% |
|
|
8.1 |
% |
Average Exchange Rate for the year |
|
|
2.18 |
|
|
|
2.44 |
|
|
|
2.93 |
|
Appreciation (Depreciation) during the year(3) |
|
|
10.7 |
% |
|
|
16.8 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
Inflation Rate (IGP-DI) |
|
|
3.8 |
% |
|
|
1.2 |
% |
|
|
12.1 |
% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Non-consolidated companies in Venezuela. |
|
(2) |
|
Considering year end exchange rate. |
|
(3) |
|
Considering average exchange rate for the year. |
Results of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2006(2006) compared to the year ended
December 31, 2005 (2005).
The comparison between our results of operations for 2006 and for 2005 has been affected by
the 10.7% decrease in the average real/U.S. dollar exchange rate for 2006 as compared to the
average real/U.S. dollar exchange rate for 2005.
95
The exchange variation resulting from monetary assets and liabilities related to operations of
consolidated subsidiaries whose functional currency is not reais are not eliminated in the
consolidation process and such results are accounted for as cumulative translation adjustments.
Revenues
Net operating revenues increased 28.4% to U.S.$72,347 million for 2006, as compared to
U.S.$56,324 million for 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to: an increase in prices
of our products, both in the domestic and international markets; an increase in sales volume both
in the domestic and international markets; and the 10.7% increase in the value of the real against
the U.S. dollar in 2006, as compared to 2005.
Consolidated sales of products and services increased 26.8% to U.S.$93,893 million for 2006,
as compared to U.S.$74,065 million for 2005, primarily due to the increases mentioned immediately
above.
Included in sales of products and services are the following amounts that we collected from
customers on behalf of the federal or state governments:
|
|
|
Value-added, PASEP, COFINS and other taxes on sales of products and services and
social security contributions. These taxes increased 21.9% to U.S.$17,906 million for
2006, as compared to U.S.$14,694 million for 2005, primarily due to the increase in
prices and sales volume of our products and services; and |
|
|
|
|
CIDE, the per-transaction fee, which increased 19.5% to U.S.$3,640 million for 2006,
as compared to U.S.$3,047 million for 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to
the increase in sales volume of our products and services and to the 10.7% increase in
the value of the real against the U.S. dollar in 2006, as compared to 2005. |
Cost of sales (excluding Depreciation, depletion and amortization)
Cost of sales for 2006 increased 34.3% to U.S.$40,061 million, as compared to U.S.$29,828
million for 2005. This increase was principally a result of:
|
|
|
a U.S.$3,376 million increase in the cost of imports due to higher prices for the
products imported and to the increase in the volume of products imported; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$2,588 million increase in costs associated with a 19.4% increase in our
international market sales volumes; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$2,033 million increase in taxes and charges imposed by the Brazilian
government totaling U.S.$7,443 million for 2006, as compared to U.S.$5,410 million for
2005, as a result of higher international oil prices and the new interpretation by the
ANP prohibiting the deductibility of charges associated with project financing for the
Marlim field; including an increase in the special participation charge (an
extraordinary charge payable in the event of high production and/or profitability from
our fields) of U.S.$3,885 million for 2006, as compared to U.S.$3,016 million for
2005, as a result of higher international oil prices and an increase of U.S.$249
million due to the new interpretation by the ANP mentioned above; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$187 million expense related to gas produced and re-injected in reserves in
the Solimões, Campos and Espírito Santo basins; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$156 million increase in costs associated with our international trading
activities, due to increases in volume and prices from offshore operations, conducted
by PifCo; and |
|
|
|
|
the 10.7% increase in the value of the Real against the U.S. dollar in 2006, as
compared to 2005. |
96
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
We calculate depreciation, depletion and amortization of most of our exploration and
production assets on the basis of the units of production method. Depreciation, depletion and
amortization expenses increased 25.5% to U.S.$3,673 million for 2006, as compared to U.S.$2,926
million for 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to the following:
|
|
|
increased capital expenditures related to property, plant and equipment associated
with our crude oil and natural gas production; and |
|
|
|
|
the 10.7% increase in the value of the Real against the U.S. dollar in 2006, as
compared to 2005. |
Exploration, including exploratory dry holes
Exploration costs, including for exploratory dry holes, decreased 7.4% to U.S.$934 million for
2006, as compared to U.S.$1,009 million for 2005. This decrease was primarily attributable to the
U.S.$71 million of gains resulting from the revision of estimated costs related to abandonment of
wells and to the decrease of U.S.$109 million in expenses related to dry holes. These decreases
were partially offset by the 10.7% increase in the value of the Real against the U.S. dollar in
2006, as compared to 2005.
Impairment of oil and gas properties
For 2006, we recorded an impairment charge of U.S.$21 million, as compared to an impairment
charge of U.S.$156 million for 2005. During 2006, the impairment charge was primarily related to
producing properties in Brazil and the most significant amounts were related to our Três Marias,
Trilha and Córrego de Pedras fields. During 2005, the impairment charge was primarily related to a
loss in some of our investments in Venezuela (U.S.$134 million), due to the tax and legal changes
implemented by the Ministry of Energy and Petroleum of Venezuela (MEP) in connection with its
nationalization measures. See note 9(c) and 9(e) to our consolidated financial statements for the
year ended December 31, 2006.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 11.5% to U.S.$4,989 million for 2006,
as compared to U.S.$4,474 million for 2005.
Selling expenses increased 11.8% to U.S.$2,394 million for 2006, as compared to U.S.$2,141
million for 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to the following:
|
|
|
an increase of approximately U.S.$43 million in expenses related to the increased
consumption of materials; |
|
|
|
|
an increase of approximately U.S.$23 million in personnel expenses due to the
increase in our workforce and salaries; |
|
|
|
|
an increase of approximately U.S.$13 million in expenses mainly associated with
transportation costs of oil products, due mainly to an increase in the exports; and |
|
|
|
|
the 10.7% increase in the value of the Real against the U.S. dollar in 2006, as
compared to 2005. |
General and administrative expenses increased 11.2% to U.S.$2,595 million for 2006, as compared to
U.S.$2,333 million for 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to the 10.7% increase in the
value of the Real against the U.S. dollar in 2006, as compared to 2005.
Research and development expenses
Research and development expenses increased 82.2% to U.S.$727 million for 2006, as compared to
U.S.$399 million for 2005. This increase was primarily due to:
97
|
|
|
a provision for an ANP research and development investment, related to regulation
ANP 05/2005, in the amount of approximately U.S.$249 million; |
|
|
|
|
additional investments in programs for environmental safety, including deepwater and
refining technologies of approximately U.S.$31 million; and |
|
|
|
|
the 10.7% increase in the value of the Real against the U.S. dollar in 2006, as
compared to 2005. |
Other operating expenses
Other operating expenses decreased 25.6% to a total of U.S.$1,081 million for 2006, as
compared to U.S.$1,453 million for 2005.
The most significant charges for 2006 were:
|
|
|
a U.S.$568 million expense for institutional relations and cultural projects; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$331 million expense for idle capacity from gas-fired power plants; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$75 million expense for losses resulting from legal proceedings and
contingencies related to pending lawsuits; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$64 million expense for unscheduled stoppages of plant and equipment; and |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$46 million gain related to bonuses received from partners and other results
with non-core activities. |
The most significant charges for 2005 were:
|
|
|
a U.S.$457 million expense for gas-fired power plants related to idle capacity and
penalties and contingencies; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$397 million expense for institutional relations and cultural projects; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$255 million loss related to the exchange of assets between us and Repsol that
occurred in 2001. See Note 10(b) to our consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2006; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$139 million expense for losses resulting from legal proceedings and
contingencies related to pending lawsuits; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$64 million expense for unscheduled stoppages of plant and equipment; and |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$61 million expense related to contractual losses from compliance with our
ship or pay commitments with respect to our investments in the OCP pipeline in Ecuador. |
Equity in results of non-consolidated companies
Equity in results of non-consolidated companies decreased 79.9% for a gain of U.S.$28 million
for 2006, as compared to a gain of U.S.$139 million for 2005, primarily as a result of losses in
investments in certain affiliated companies of Petrobras Distribuidora S.A., in the amount of
U.S.$52 million and in certain affiliated companies of Petrobras S.A., in the amount of U.S.$43
million.
Financial income
We derive financial income from several sources, including interest on cash and cash
equivalents. The majority of our cash equivalents are short-term Brazilian government securities,
including securities indexed to the U.S. dollar. We also hold U.S. dollar deposits.
98
Financial income increased 64.1% to a gain of U.S.$1,165 million for 2006 as compared to
U.S.$710 million for 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in financial
interest income from short-term investments, in the amount of U.S.$229 million, in 2006 as a result
of increased cash and cash equivalent due to increases in operational cash generation, and an
increase in financial income from customers in the amount of U.S$147 million, as compared to 2005.
A breakdown of financial income and expenses is disclosed in Note 13 to our consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Financial expenses
Financial expenses increased 12.7% to U.S.$1,340 million for 2006, as compared to U.S.$1,189
million for 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to the increase of U.S.$378 million of
losses on derivatives instruments principally due to cancellation of gas hedge contract; and
U.S.$143 million of losses with repurchased securities. These increases were partially offset by
the increase of U.S.$389 million in our capitalized interest as part of the cost of construction
and development of crude oil and natural gas production projects. A breakdown of financial income
and expenses is disclosed in Note 13 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2006.
Monetary and exchange variation on monetary assets and liabilities, net
Monetary and exchange variation on monetary assets and liabilities, net generated a gain of
U.S.$75 million for 2006, as compared to a gain of U.S.$248 million for 2005. The decrease in
monetary and exchange variation on monetary assets and liabilities, net is primarily attributable
to the effect of the 8.7% appreciation of the Real against the U.S. dollar during 2006, as compared
to the 11.8% appreciation of the Real against the U.S. dollar during 2005.
Employee benefit expense for retired participants
The employee benefit expense consists of financial costs associated with expected pension and
health care costs. Our employee benefit expense increased 2.3% to U.S.$1,017 million for 2006, as
compared to U.S.$994 million for 2005. This increase was primarily attributable to the 10.7%
increase in the value of the Real against the U.S. dollar in 2006, as compared to 2005. This
increase was partially offset by the decrease of U.S.$96 million in the employee benefit expense
for non-active participants due to the increase in expected return on plan assets regarding the
good market performance during 2006.
Other taxes
Other taxes, consisting of miscellaneous value-added, transaction and sales taxes, increased
59.2% to U.S.$594 million for 2006, as compared to U.S.$373 million for 2005. This increase was
primarily attributable to:
|
|
|
an increase of U.S.$54 million in the PASEP/COFINS tax related to the increase in
financial income; |
|
|
|
|
an increase of U.S.$49 million in the CPMF, a tax payable in connection with certain
bank account transactions; |
|
|
|
|
an increase of U.S.$48 million in taxes related to the increase in operations with
SPEs, mainly with Companhia Locadora de Equipamentos Petrolíferos CLEP, Nova
Transportadora do Sudeste NTS and Nova Transportadora do Nordeste NTN; |
|
|
|
|
an U.S.$12 million increase in taxes in Colombia and Bolivia, related to foreign
remittance accounts and dividends; and |
|
|
|
|
the 10.7% increase in the value of the Real against the U.S. dollar in 2006, as
compared to 2005. |
99
Other expenses, net
Other expenses, net are primarily composed of gains and losses recorded on sales of fixed
assets and certain other non-recurring charges. Other expenses, net decreased 39.3% to U.S.$17
million for 2006, as compared to U.S.$28 million for 2005, primarily due to the decrease in
expenses related to platforms that were not producing.
Income tax (expense) benefit
Income before income taxes, minority interest and extraordinary gain increased 31.3% to
U.S.$19,161 million for 2006, as compared to U.S.$14,592 million for 2005. The income tax expense
increased 28.1% to U.S.$5,691 million for 2006, as compared to U.S.$4,441 million for 2005,
primarily due to the increase in income mentioned above. This increase was partially offset by the
additional tax benefits related to the provisioning of interest on shareholders equity that
amounted to U.S.$1,012 million for 2006 as compared to tax benefits related to the provisioning of
interest on shareholders equity that amounted to U.S.$791 million for 2005. The reconciliation
between the tax calculated based upon statutory tax rates to income tax expense and effective rates
is disclosed in Note 3 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31,
2006.
Extraordinary gain, net of taxes
We recorded an extraordinary gain, net of taxes, in the amount of U.S.$158 million due to the
Escalators Liquidation Agreement entered into on December 29, 2005, and effective as from January
1, 2006, related to a contingent purchase price adjustment on the exchange of assets between us and
Repsol that occurred in 2001. See Note 10 (b) to our consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2006.
Results of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2005(2005) compared to the year ended
December 31, 2004 (2004).
The comparison between our results of operations for 2005 and 2004 has been affected by the
16.8% decrease in the average Real/U.S. dollar exchange rate for 2005 as compared to the average
Real/U.S. dollar exchange rate for 2004. We refer to this change in the average exchange rate as
the 16.8% increase in the value of the Real against the U.S. dollar in 2005, as compared to 2004.
The exchange variation resulting from monetary assets and liabilities related to operations of
consolidated subsidiaries whose functional currency is not reais are not eliminated in the
consolidation process and such results are accounted for as cumulative translation adjustments.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation
standards. These reclassifications had no impact on the Companys net income.
Revenues
Net operating revenues increased 46.6% to U.S.$56,324 million for 2005, as compared to
U.S.$38,428 million for 2004. This increase was primarily attributable to an increase in prices of
our products, both in the domestic market and outside Brazil, an increase in sales volume in the
domestic market, and the 16.8% increase in the value of the Real against the U.S. dollar in 2005,
as compared to 2004.
Consolidated sales of products and services increased 42.6% to U.S.$74,065 million for 2005,
as compared to U.S.$51,954 million for 2004, primarily due to the increases mentioned immediately
above.
Included in sales of products and services are the following amounts that we collected on
behalf of the federal or state governments:
|
|
|
Value-added (ICMS), PASEP, COFINS and other taxes on sales of products and services
and social security contributions. These taxes increased 34.7% to U.S.$14,694 million
for 2005, as compared to U.S.$10,906 million for 2004, primarily due to the increase in
prices and sales volume of our products and services; and |
100
|
|
|
CIDE, the per-transaction fee, which increased 16.3% to U.S.$3,047 million for 2005,
as compared to U.S.$2,620 million for 2004. This increase was primarily attributable to
the increase in sales volume of our products and services and to the 16.8% increase in
the value of the Real against the U.S. dollar in 2005, as compared to 2004. |
Cost of sales (excluding Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization)
Cost of sales for 2005 increased 40.2% to U.S.$29,828 million, as compared to U.S.$21,279
million for 2004. This increase was principally a result of:
|
|
|
a U.S.$1,834 million increase in taxes and charges paid to the Brazilian government
totaling U.S.$5,410 million for 2005, as compared to U.S.$3,576 million for 2004,
including an increase in the special participation charge (an extraordinary charge
payable in the event of high production and/or profitability from our fields) to
U.S.$3,016 million for 2005, as compared to U.S.$1,883 million for 2004, as a result of
higher international oil prices; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$1,654 million increase in the cost of imports due to higher prices for the
products imported; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$1,375 million increase in costs attributable to: (1) maintenance and
technical services for well restoration, materials, support for vessels, undersea
operations, freight with third parties (these prices tend to accompany the
international oil prices) consumption of chemical products to clear out and eliminate
toxic gases principally at Marlim; and (2) higher personnel expenses primarily
related to: overtime payments as set forth in our collective bargaining agreement; an
increase in our workforce; and a revision in the actuarial calculations relating to
future health care and pension benefits; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$1,281 million increase in costs associated with our international trading
activities, due to increases in volume and prices from offshore operations, conducted
by PifCo; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$561 million increase in costs associated with a 9.0% increase in our
international market sales volumes; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$534 million increase in costs in our Argentinean subsidiary PEPSA mainly due
to oil products purchases as a result of total capacity utilization of its refineries
and higher sales volume of petrochemical products; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$198 million increase in costs associated with a 1.7% increase in our domestic
sales volumes; and |
|
|
|
|
the 16.8% increase in the value of the Real against the U.S. dollar in 2005, as
compared to 2004. |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization
We calculate depreciation, depletion and amortization of our exploration and production assets
on the basis of the units of production method. Depreciation, depletion and amortization expenses
increased 17.9% to U.S.$2,926 million for 2005, as compared to U.S.$2,481 million for 2004. This
increase was primarily attributable to the following:
|
|
|
increased property, plant and equipment expenditures an increased crude oil and
natural gas production; and |
|
|
|
|
the 16.8% increase in the value of the Real against the U.S. dollar in 2005, as
compared to 2004. |
Exploration, including exploratory dry holes
Exploration costs, including exploratory dry holes increased 64.6% to U.S.$1,009 million for
2005, as compared to U.S.$613 million for 2004. We adopted the amended FAS 19-1 effective January
1, 2005, without material impact. This increase was primarily attributable to the following:
101
|
|
|
the increase of U.S.$196 million due to a revision in the estimated expenses for
dismantling oil and gas producing areas and future well abandonment that affected
the exploration costs and was related to new commercial areas, increased estimates
of cost to abandon and changes in asset retirement obligations estimates provided
by operators in joint ventures; |
|
|
|
|
an increase of U.S.$98 million in geological and geophysical expenses; |
|
|
|
|
an increase of U.S.$16 million in dry holes expenses; and |
|
|
|
|
the 16.8% increase in the value of the Real against the U.S. dollar in 2005, as
compared to 2004. |
Impairment of oil and gas properties
For 2005, we recorded an impairment charge of U.S.$156 million, as compared to an impairment
charge of U.S.$65 million for 2004. During 2005, the impairment charge was primarily related to
investments in Venezuela (U.S.$134 million), due to the tax and legal changes implemented by the
Ministry of Energy and Petroleum of Venezuela (MEP). During 2004, the impairment charge was related
to producing properties in Brazil and principle amounts were related to the Companys Cioba
off-shore field (U.S.$30 million). See Note 10(d) to our consolidated financial statements for the
year ended December 31, 2005.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased 54.2% to U.S.$4,474 million for 2005,
as compared to U.S.$2,901 million for 2004.
Selling expenses increased 38.7% to U.S.$2,141 million for 2005, as compared to U.S.$1,544
million for 2004. This increase was primarily attributable to the following:
|
|
|
an increase of U.S.$338 million in expenses mainly associated with the
transportation costs of oil products due mainly to an increase in the exports; and |
|
|
|
|
the 16.8% increase in the value of the Real against the U.S. dollar in 2005, as
compared to 2004. |
General and administrative expenses increased 71.9% to U.S.$2,333 million for 2005, as
compared to U.S.$1,357 million for 2004. This increase was primarily attributable to the following:
|
|
|
an increase of approximately U.S.$287 million in employee expenses due to the
increase in our workforce and salaries; and an increase in the actuarial calculations
relating to future health care and pension benefits due to changes in actuarial
assumptions; |
|
|
|
|
an increase of approximately U.S.$212 million in expenses related to technical
consulting services in connection with our increased outsourcing of selected non-core
general activities; and |
|
|
|
|
the 16.8% increase in the average value of the Real against the U.S. dollar in 2005,
as compared to 2004. |
Research and development expenses
Research and development expenses increased 60.9% to U.S.$399 million for 2005, as compared to
U.S.$248 million for 2004. This increase was primarily related to additional investments in
programs for environmental safety, to deepwater and refining technologies of approximately U.S.$101
million and to the 16.8% increase in the value of the Real against the U.S. dollar in 2005, as
compared to 2004.
Other operating expenses
Other operating expenses amounted to U.S.$1,453 million for 2005, as compared to U.S.$480
million for 2004.
102
The charges for 2005 were:
|
|
|
a U.S.$457 million expense for gas-fired power plants related to idle capacity and
penalties and contingencies; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$397 million expense for institutional relations and cultural projects; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$255 million loss related to the exchange of assets between us and Repsol that
occurred in 2001. See Note 10(b) to our consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2006; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$139 million expense for losses resulting from legal proceedings and
contingencies related to pending lawsuits; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$64 million expense for unscheduled stoppages of plant and equipment; and |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$61 million expense related to contractual losses from compliance with our
ship or pay commitments with respect to our investments in the OCP pipeline in Ecuador. |
The charges for 2004 were:
|
|
|
a U.S.$262 million expense for institutional relations and cultural projects; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$87 million expense for legal liability and contingencies related to pending lawsuits; and |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$85 million expense for unscheduled stoppages of plant and equipment. |
Equity in results of non-consolidated companies
Equity in results of non-consolidated companies decreased 19.2% to a gain of U.S.$139 million
for 2005, as compared to a gain of U.S.$172 million for 2004, primarily due to the results of our
investments in certain gas-fired power and petrochemical companies being lower as certain of these
entities have been subsequently purchased and are now consolidated on a line by line basis; and as
a result of losses in investments in certain affiliated companies of Petrobras Energia Venezuela
S.A, in the amount of U.S.$19 million.
Financial income
We derive financial income from several sources, including interest on cash and cash
equivalents. The majority of our cash equivalents are short-term Brazilian government securities,
including securities indexed to the U.S. dollar. We also hold U.S. dollar deposits.
Financial income decreased 25.7% to U.S.$710 million for 2005 as compared to U.S.$956 million
for 2004. This decrease was primarily attributable to the reduction of fair value adjustments on
gas hedge transactions in the amount of U.S.$460 million.
This decrease was partially offset by an increase in financial interest income from short-term
investments, in the amount of U.S.$138 million, primarily attributable to increased investments in
securities in 2005 as compared to 2004, due to higher amount of cash and cash equivalents. A
breakdown of financial income and expenses is shown in Note 14 to our consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Financial expenses
Financial expenses decreased 31.4% to U.S.$1,189 million for 2005, as compared to U.S.$1,733
million for 2004. This decrease was primarily attributable to:
|
|
|
a U.S.$345 million increase in our interest expense capitalized as part of the cost
of construction and development of crude oil and natural gas production projects. A
breakdown of financial income and |
103
|
|
|
expenses is shown in Note 14 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2005; |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$130 million decrease of expenses related to hedge transactions; and |
|
|
|
|
a U.S.$120 million decrease in expenses relating to repurchases of our own securities. |
Monetary and exchange variation on monetary assets and liabilities, net
Monetary and exchange variation on monetary assets and liabilities, net generated a gain of
U.S.$248 million for 2005, as compared to a gain of U.S.$450 million for 2004. The decrease in
monetary and exchange variation on monetary assets and liabilities, net is primarily attributable
to the effect of the 11.8% year ended value appreciation of the Real against the U.S. dollar during
2005, as compared to the 8.1% appreciation of the Real against the U.S. dollar during 2004.
Employee benefit expense for non-active participants
The employee benefit expense consists of financial costs associated with expected pension and
health care costs. Our employee benefit expense increased 52.9% to U.S.$994 million for 2005, as
compared to U.S.$650 million for 2004. This increase in costs was primarily attributable to an
increase of U.S.$212 million in the annual actuarial calculation of our pension and health care
plan liability and to the 16.8% average increase in the value of the Real against the U.S. dollar
in 2005, as compared to 2004.
Other taxes
Other taxes, consisting of miscellaneous value-added, transaction and sales taxes, decreased
15.2% to U.S.$373 million for 2005, as compared to U.S.$440 million for 2004. This decrease was
primarily attributable to the decrease of U.S.$149 million in the PASEP/COFINS taxes on financial
income, due to a reduction to zero in the applicable rate as of August 2, 2004. This decrease was
partially offset by the 16.8% increase in the value of the Real against the U.S. dollar in 2005, as
compared to 2004.
Other expenses, net
Other expenses, net are primarily composed of gains and losses recorded on sales of fixed
assets and certain other non-recurring charges. Other expenses, net decreased 84.5% to U.S.$28
million for 2005, as compared to U.S.$181 million for 2004, primarily due to the decrease in
expenses related to platforms that were not producing.
Income tax (expense) benefit
Income before income taxes, minority interest, extraordinary item and accounting changes
increased 63.3% to U.S.$14,592 million for 2005, as compared to U.S.$8,935 million for 2004. The
income tax expense increased 99.1% to U.S.$4,441 million for 2005, as compared to U.S.$2,231
million for 2004, primarily due to the increase in income, mentioned above. This increase was
partially offset by the additional tax benefits related to interest on shareholders equity that
amounted to U.S.$791 million for 2005, as compared to U.S.$650 million for 2004.
The reconciliation between the tax calculated based upon statutory tax rates to income tax
expense and effective rates is shown in Note 4 to our consolidated financial statements for the
year ended December 31, 2005.
Extraordinary gain, net of taxes
We recorded an extraordinary gain, net of taxes, in the amount of U.S.$158 million due to the
Escalators Liquidation Agreement entered into on December 29, 2005, and effective as from January
1, 2006, related to a contingent purchase price adjustment on the exchange of assets between us and
Repsol occurred in 2001. See Note 11(c) to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2005.
Business Segments
Set forth below is selected financial data by segment for 2006, 2005 and 2004:
104
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA BY SEGMENT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(In millions of U.S. dollars) |
|
Exploration, Development and Production (Exploration
and Production Segment) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues to third parties (1)(2) |
|
$ |
3,351 |
|
|
$ |
1,874 |
|
|
$ |
2,487 |
|
Intersegment net revenues |
|
|
32,387 |
|
|
|
26,950 |
|
|
|
16,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net operating revenues (2) |
|
|
35,738 |
|
|
|
28,824 |
|
|
|
18,871 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
(2,166 |
) |
|
|
(1,571 |
) |
|
|
(1,322 |
) |
Net income (3) |
|
|
11,958 |
|
|
|
9,469 |
|
|
|
5,949 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
7,329 |
|
|
|
6,127 |
|
|
|
4,574 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
33,979 |
|
|
|
25,876 |
|
|
|
20,458 |
|
Refining, Transportation and Marketing (Supply Segment) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues to third parties (1)(2) |
|
$ |
42,831 |
|
|
$ |
33,229 |
|
|
$ |
20,981 |
|
Intersegment net revenues |
|
|
15,128 |
|
|
|
12,286 |
|
|
|
7,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net operating revenues(2) |
|
|
57,959 |
|
|
|
45,515 |
|
|
|
28,767 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
(669 |
) |
|
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
(548 |
) |
Net income (3) |
|
|
2,540 |
|
|
|
2,245 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
1,936 |
|
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
|
1,367 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
9,828 |
|
|
|
8,098 |
|
|
|
6,333 |
|
Distribution (Distribution Segment) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues to third parties (1) |
|
$ |
18,394 |
|
|
$ |
15,642 |
|
|
$ |
10,328 |
|
Intersegment net revenues |
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net operating revenues |
|
|
18,681 |
|
|
|
15,867 |
|
|
|
10,486 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
Net income (3) |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
Natural Gas and Power (Gas and Power Segment) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues to third parties (1) |
|
$ |
2,833 |
|
|
$ |
1,932 |
|
|
$ |
1,547 |
|
Intersegment net revenues |
|
|
1,257 |
|
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net operating revenues |
|
|
4,090 |
|
|
|
3,164 |
|
|
|
2,021 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
Net loss (3) |
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
(347 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
1,664 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
6,828 |
|
|
|
5,328 |
|
|
|
4,506 |
|
International (International Segment) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenues to third parties (1) |
|
$ |
4,938 |
|
|
$ |
3,647 |
|
|
$ |
3,085 |
|
Intersegment net revenues |
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net operating revenues |
|
|
6,071 |
|
|
|
4,527 |
|
|
|
3,604 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
(417 |
) |
|
|
(461 |
) |
|
|
(423 |
) |
Net income (3) |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
2,637 |
|
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
|
727 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
5,722 |
|
|
|
4,655 |
|
|
|
4,160 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As a vertically integrated company, not all of our segments have significant third-party
revenues. For example, our exploration and production segment accounts for a large part of our
economic activity and capital expenditures, but has little third party revenues. |
|
(2) |
|
Since 2005, revenues from commercialization of oil to third parties are being classified in
accordance with the points of sale, which could be either the Exploration & Production or
Supply segments. Until 2004, revenues from commercialization of oil were allocated entirely to
the Exploration & Production segment. This classification generated no significant impact on
the results reported for these segments and segment information has not been restated as it is
impracticable to gather and collect data for prior periods as to point of sale. |
|
(3) |
|
In order to align the financial statements of each business segment with the best practices
of companies in the Oil & Gas sector and to improve our managements understanding, since the
first quarter of 2006 we have switched to allocating all financial results and items of a
financial nature to the corporate level, including prior years. |
105
Managements Discussion and Analysis of PifCos Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Overview
PifCo is a wholly-owned subsidiary of ours. Accordingly, PifCos financial position and
results of operations are significantly affected by our decisions. PifCos ability to meet its
outstanding debt obligations depends on a number of factors, including:
|
|
|
our financial condition and results of operations; |
|
|
|
|
the extent to which we continue to use PifCos services for market purchases of
crude oil and oil products; |
|
|
|
|
Our willingness to continue to make loans to PifCo and provide PifCo with other
types of financial support; |
|
|
|
|
PifCos ability to access financing sources, including the international capital
markets and third-party credit facilities; and |
|
|
|
|
PifCos ability to transfer our financing costs to us. |
PifCo earns income from:
|
|
|
sales of crude oil and oil products to us; |
|
|
|
|
limited sales of crude oil and oil products to third parties; and |
|
|
|
|
the financing of sales to us, inter-company loans to us and investments in
marketable securities and other financial instruments. |
PifCos operating expenses include:
|
|
|
cost of sales, which is comprised mainly of purchases of crude oil and oil products; |
|
|
|
|
selling, general and administrative expenses; and |
|
|
|
|
financial expense, mainly from interest on its lines of credit and capital markets
indebtedness, sales of future receivables and inter-company loans from us. |
Purchases and Sales of Crude Oil and Oil Products
PifCo typically purchases crude oil and oil products in transactions with payment terms of
approximately 30 days. We typically pay for shipments of crude oil and oil products that PifCo
sells to us over a period of up to 330 days, which allows us sufficient time to assemble the
necessary documentation under Brazilian law to commence the payment process for our shipments.
Before February 2005, PifCo sold crude oil and oil products to us under terms that allowed for
payment up to 270 days from the date of the bill of lading. During this period, PifCo typically
finances the purchase of crude oil and oil products through either funds previously provided by us
or third-party trade finance arrangements. The difference between the amount PifCo pays for crude
oil and oil products and the amount we pay for that same crude oil and oil products is deferred and
recognized as part of PifCos financial income on a straight-line basis over the period in which
our payments to PifCo come due.
106
Results of Operations
Results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2006 compared to the year ended December 31,
2005.
Net Loss
PifCo had a loss of U.S.$210.5 million in 2006, as compared to a loss of U.S.$27.8 million in
2005, primarily due to (1) the notes repurchased in connection with the debt tender offer resulting
an expense of U.S.$160.0 million, and (2) the payment of premium related to the PFL prepaid fixed
rate Senior Trust Certificates (Series A1 and B) in the amount of U.S.$13.7 million.
Sales of Crude Oil and Oil Products and Services
PifCos sales of crude oil and oil products and services increased 28.8% from U.S.$17,136.1
million in 2005 to U.S.$22,069.8 million in 2006. This increase was primarily due to a 19.8%
increase in the average price of Brent crude oil, from U.S.$54.38 per barrel in 2005 to U.S.$65.14
per barrel in 2006 and due to a 15.3% increase in the volume of trading sales of crude oil and oil
products.
Cost of Sales
Cost of sales increased 29.0% from U.S.$16,983.3 million in 2005 to U.S.$21,900.5 million in
2006. This increase was primarily due to the increase in the average price of Brent crude oil and
volume described above.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
PifCos selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of shipping costs and
fees for services, including accounting, legal and rating services. These expenses increased 25.1%
from U.S.$165.7 million in 2005 to U.S.$207.4 million in 2006, of which U.S.$171.0 million
consisted of shipping expenses due to an increase in average freight rates in the period, as the
result of changes in international market trends and shipping routes.
Financial Income
PifCos financial income consists of the financing of sales to us and inter-company loans to
us, and investments in marketable securities and other financial instruments. PifCos financial
income increased 30.6% from U.S.$984.0 million in 2005 to U.S.$1,285.2 million in 2006, primarily
due to (1) an increase in the amount of sales to us made during 2005 compared to 2004, as well as
the amount of sales during 2006, resulting in additional financial income due to the financing
terms granted to us and due to interest calculated on a monthly basis (see Purchases and Sales of
Crude Oil and Oil Products), (2) an increase in loans to related parties, and (3) an increase in
interest income from short and long-term investments as a result of a higher returns.
Financial Expense
PifCos financial expense consists of interest paid and accrued on PifCos outstanding
indebtedness and other fees associated with PifCos issuance of debt. PifCos financial expense
increased 45.9% from U.S.$998.9 million in 2005 to U.S.$1,457.8 million in 2006, primarily due to
(1) the notes repurchased in connection with the debt tender offer resulting an expense of
U.S.$160.0 million, (2) an increase in inter-company loans from us, (3) an increase in interest
expenses associated with lines of credit and (4) the payment of premium related to the PFL prepaid
fixed rate Senior Trust Certificates (Series A1 and B) in the amount of U.S.$13.7 million.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Petrobras
Overview
Our principal uses of funds are for capital expenditures, dividend payments and repayment of
debt. Historically we have met these requirements with internally generated funds, short-term debt,
long-term debt,
107
project financing and sale and leaseback agreements. We believe these sources of funds,
together with our strong cash and cash equivalents, will continue to allow us to meet our currently
anticipated capital requirements. In 2007, our major cash needs include planned capital
expenditures of U.S.$23,706 million, announced dividends of U.S.$3,693 million and payments of
U.S.$4,519 million on our long-term debt, leasing and project financing obligations.
Financing Strategy
The objective of our financing strategy is to help us achieve the targets set forth in our
business plan released on June 30, 2006, which provides for capital expenditures of U.S.$87.1
billion from 2007 through 2011. We will continue our policy of extending the term of our debt
maturity profile, while keeping leverage within the comfortable range, so that, in spite of the
expansion of investments, average financial leverage should be close to that under the previous
plan. We also intend to reduce our cost of capital through a variety of medium and long-term
financing arrangements, including supplier financing, project financing, bank financing,
securitization and issuance of debt, and a share repurchase program that was approved by our Board
of Directors on December 15, 2006.
Government Regulation
The Ministry of Planning, Budget and Management controls the total amount of medium and
long-term debt that we and our Brazilian subsidiaries are allowed to incur through the annual
budget approval process (Plano de Dispêndio Global, or PDG). Before issuing medium and long-term
debt, we and our Brazilian subsidiaries must also obtain the approval of the National Treasury
shortly before issuance.
In accordance with Senate Resolution Nº 96/89 the level of our borrowings is subject to an
annual maximum amount, exclusive of certain permitted commercial obligations, based on
shareholders equity, debt service expense and other factors as of the prior year and subject to
certain ongoing quarterly adjustments. For 2006, the maximum level of debt that we could incur was
set at U.S.$985 million. The maximum level was set at U.S.$891.6 million for 2005 and U.S.$958
million for 2004.
All of our foreign currency denominated debt, as well as the foreign currency denominated debt
of our Brazilian subsidiaries, requires registration with the Central Bank. The issuance of debt by
our international subsidiaries, however, is not subject to registration with the Central Bank or
approval by the National Treasury. In addition, all issuances of medium and long-term notes and
debentures require the approval of our Board of Directors. Borrowings that exceed the approved
budget amount for any year also require approval of the Brazilian Senate.
Sources of Funds
Our Cash Flow
On December 31, 2006, we had cash and cash equivalents of U.S.$12,688 million as compared to
U.S.$9,871 million at December 31, 2005.
Operating activities provided net cash flows of U.S.$21,077 million for 2006, as compared to
U.S.$15,115 million for 2005. Cash generated by operating activities was mainly affected by net
operating revenues that increased U.S.$16,023 million, primarily due to an increase in sales volume
and in prices in both the domestic market and outside of Brazil.
Net cash used in investing activities increased to U.S.$14,681 million for 2006, as compared
to U.S.$10,207 million for 2005. This increase was due primarily to our capital expenditures
associated with our operating activities, which used U.S.$14,643 million, including U.S.$7,329
million related to our exploration and production projects in Brazil, mainly in the Campos basin.
Financing activities used net cash of U.S.$4,354 million for 2006, as compared to net cash
used in financing activities in the amount of U.S.$2,625 million for 2005. This increase was
primarily due to an increase in the amount of dividends paid to shareholders, in 2006 as compared
to 2005, and to the debt repurchase tender offer of notes of PifCo, in the amount of U.S.$1,046
million.
108
Short-Term Debt
Our outstanding short-term debt serves mainly to support our imports of crude oil and oil
products, and is provided almost entirely by international banks. On December 31, 2006, our
short-term debt (excluding current portions of long-term obligations) amounted to U.S.$1,293
million as compared to U.S.$950 million on December 31, 2005.
Long-Term Debt
Our outstanding long-term debt consists primarily of the issuance of securities in the
international capital markets, debentures in the domestic capital markets, amounts outstanding
under facilities guaranteed by export credit agencies and multilateral agencies and loans from the
Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social (the Brazilian National Development Bank, or
BNDES) and other financial institutions. Outstanding long-term debt, plus the current portion of
our long-term debt remained relatively constant, amounting to U.S.$12,616 million on December 31,
2006, as compared to U.S.$12,931 million on December 31, 2005.
Included in these figures on December 31, 2006 are the following international debt issues:
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
|
Principal amount |
6.625% Step Down Notes due 2007 (1) |
|
EUR 134 million |
PifCos 9.125% Notes due 2007 (2) |
|
U.S.$500 million |
PifCos 9.875% Notes due 2008 (2) |
|
U.S.$450 million |
PifCos 9.750% Notes due 2011 (2) |
|
U.S.$600 million |
PifCos 4.750% Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2007 |
|
U.S.$338 million |
PifCos 12.375% Global Step-up Notes due 2008 (3) |
|
U.S.$400 million |
PifCos 9.125% Global Notes due 2013 |
|
U.S.$750 million |
PifCos 8.375% Global Notes due 2018 |
|
U.S.$750 million |
PifCos 3.748% Senior Trust Certificates due 2013 |
|
U.S.$200 million |
PifCos 6.436% Senior Trust Certificates due 2015 |
|
U.S.$550 million |
PEPSAs 9.375% Notes due 2013 |
|
U.S.$100 million |
PifCos 7.75% Global Notes due 2014 |
|
U.S.$600 million |
PifCos 6.125% Global Notes due 2016 |
|
U.S.$500 million |
PifCos 2.15% Japanese Yen Bonds due 2016 (4) |
|
U.S.$294 million |
PEPSAs 9.00% Notes due 2009 |
|
U.S.$181 million |
PEPSAs 8.13% Notes due 2010 |
|
U.S.$349 million |
PEPSAs 6.55% Notes due 2011 |
|
U.S.$87 million |
PEPSAs 9.38% Notes due 2013 |
|
U.S.$200 million |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Euro; U.S.$1.3191 = EUR 1.00 at December 31, 2006. |
|
(2) |
|
Issued by PifCo, with support from us through a standby purchase agreement and with insurance
against 18 months of inconvertibility and transfer risk for interest payments. |
|
(3) |
|
The Global Step-up Notes bear interest from March 31, 2003 at a rate of 9.00% per year until
April 1, 2006 and at rate of 12.375% per year thereafter, with interest payable semi-annually.
Issued by PifCo, with support from us through a standby purchase agreement. |
|
(4) |
|
Issued by PifCo on September 27, 2006 in the amount of ¥ 35 billion. |
Project financing
Since 1997, we have utilized project financing to provide capital for our extensive
exploration and production operations and related projects, including some natural gas processing
and transportation systems. All of these projects and the related debt obligations of special
purpose companies (SPCs) established for these financings are on-balance sheet and accounted for
under the line item Project Financings. Under typical contractual arrangements, we are
responsible for completing the development of the oil and gas fields, operating the fields, paying
all operating expenses relating to the projects and remitting a portion of the net proceeds
generated from the
109
fields to fund the SPCs debt and return on equity payments. At the end of each financing
project, we have the option to purchase the project assets from the SPC or, in some cases, acquire
control over the SPC itself.
Outstanding project financing, plus the current portion of our project financing, totaled
U.S.$6,374 million at December 31, 2006, as compared to U.S.$6,042 million at December 31, 2005.
During 2006, we made capital expenditures of U.S.$7,329 million (50.1% of our total capital
expenditures) in connection with exploration and development projects in Brazil, mainly in the
Campos Basin, a number of which are being financed through project financings.
Of the U.S.$2,955 million projected amount of expenditures for project financings in 2007, we
expect that approximately U.S.$819 million will be used by our exploration and production segment,
U.S.$397 million by our supply segment and U.S.$1,739 million by our Gas and Power segment. The
amount of Gas and Power segment will be applied directly by SPCs created for this finality.
On December 31, 2006, the long-term portion of project financings becomes due in the following
years:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions |
|
|
|
of U.S. dollars) |
|
2008 |
|
|
1,252 |
|
2009 |
|
|
993 |
|
2010 |
|
|
666 |
|
2011 |
|
|
401 |
|
2012 |
|
|
158 |
|
2013 and thereafter |
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
PifCo
Overview
PifCo finances its oil trading activities principally from commercial banks, including lines
of credit, as well as through inter-company loans from us and the issuance of notes in the
international capital markets. As an offshore non-Brazilian company, PifCo is not legally obligated
to receive prior approval from the Brazilian National Treasury before incurring debt or registering
debt with the Central Bank. As a matter of policy, however, the issuance of any debt follows the
recommendation by any of our Chief Financial Officer, Executive Board or Board of Directors,
depending on the aggregate principal amount and the tenor of the debt to be issued.
Sources of Funds
PifCos Cash Flow
On December 31, 2006, PifCo had cash and cash equivalents of U.S.$510.8 million, as compared
to U.S.$230.7 million at December 31, 2005. The increase in cash was primarily a result of proceeds
from short and long term loans from us during 2006. PifCos operating activities used net cash of
U.S.$1,967.4 million in 2006, as compared to using net cash of U.S.$5.9 million in 2005, primarily
as a result of (i) an increase in trade accounts receivable from related parties, as a result of an
increase in the average price of Brent crude oil, (ii) the change of the period during which we pay
PifCo for shipments of crude oil and oil products from 270 to 330 days and (iii) an increase in the
volume of trading sales of crude oil and oil products. PifCos investing activities used net cash
of U.S.$1,891.0 million in 2006, as compared to using net cash of U.S.$2,271.0 million in 2005,
primarily as a result of a decrease in outstanding position of marketable securities due to the
amortization of CLEP securities in the amount of U.S.$630 million. PifCos financing activities
provided net cash of U.S.$4,138.5 million in 2006, as compared to providing net cash of
U.S.$1,400.3 million in 2005, primarily as a result of an increase in proceeds from short and
long-term loans from us.
110
Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable from related parties increased 22.8% from U.S.$8,681.1 million on December
31, 2005 to U.S.$10,658.9 million on December 31, 2006, primarily as a result of an increase of
19.8% in the average price of Brent crude oil and due to a 15.3% increase in the volume of trading
sales of crude oil and oil products.
PifCos Short-Term Borrowings
PifCos short-term borrowings are denominated in U.S. dollars and consist of lines of credit
and loans payable. PifCos outstanding position at December 31, 2006 in irrevocable letters of
credit was U.S.$552.1 million, as compared to U.S.$369.5 million at December 31, 2005. Considering
only the issuance of irrevocable letters of credit supporting oil imports, PifCos outstanding
position at December 31, 2006 was U.S.365.0 million, as compared to U.S.$300.6 million at December
31, 2005. At December 31, 2006, PifCo had accessed U.S.$329.2 million in lines of credit,
including the current portion of long-term lines of credit, as compared to U.S.$493.6 million
accessed at December 31, 2005. The weighted average annual interest rate on these short-term
borrowings was 6.76% at December 31, 2006, as compared to 5.0% at December 31, 2005. At December
31, 2006, PifCo had utilized all the proceeds from lines of credit for the purchase of imports.
The short-term portion of PifCos notes payable to related parties, which are principally
composed of notes payable to us, increased 23.9% from U.S.$4,346.1 million at December 31, 2005 to
U.S.$5,386.8 million at December 31, 2006, primarily as a result of PifCos short-term financing
needs.
PifCos Long-Term Borrowings
PifCos long-term loans from us increased from U.S.$3,734.1 million on December 31, 2005 to
U.S.$7,441.7 million on December 31, 2006, with interest rates ranging from 8.3% to 8.6% and due
between 2010 and 2021.
On December 31, 2006, PifCo had outstanding U.S.$1,041.3 million in long-term lines of credit
due between 2008 and 2017, as compared to U.S.$1,194.7 million on December 31, 2005.
On July 24, 2006, PifCo concluded its debt repurchase offer (Tender) announced on July 18,
2006. The amount of notes tendered for five series of notes listed below was U.S.$888.3 million.
Including the notes previously repurchased by us and our affiliates, also included in the tender,
the total value reached U.S.$1,215.7 million. The purpose of this initiative was to reduce total
debt outstanding and simplify the debt profile, thus benefiting from PifCos current strong cash
generation. The transaction was settled on July 27, 2006 and all the notes tendered were canceled
from this date. Upon conclusion of the Tender, PifCo incurred in expenses in the total amount of
U.S.$160.0 million.
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Principal Amount |
|
Securities Repurchased |
|
Rate |
|
|
Date |
|
|
(in millions of U.S.dollars) |
|
Global step-up notes |
|
|
12.375 |
% |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
U.S.$265.4 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
9.875 |
% |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
211.8 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
9.750 |
% |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
313.6 |
|
Global notes |
|
|
9.125 |
% |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
251.7 |
|
Global notes |
|
|
8.375 |
% |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
173.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$1,215.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After the Tender, the outstanding amount of the other long-term borrowings are:
|
|
|
U.S.$524.6 million (U.S.$500 million current portion) in two series of long-term
Senior Notes due to 2008 and 2011. On July 24, 2006 these notes were tendered in the
amount of U.S.$525.4 million. The notes bear interest of 9.875% and 9.75%,
respectively. |
|
|
|
|
U.S.$329.9 million (current portion) in 4.75% Senior Exchangeable Notes due 2007,
issued on October 17, 2002, in connection with our purchase of Perez Companc S.A.
(currently known as Petrobras Energia ParticipacionesPEPSA). In exchange, PifCo
received notes issued by Petrobras International Braspetro BV (PIB BV), a related
party, in the same amount, terms and conditions as the Senior Exchangeable Notes. In
connection with the acquisition of Perez Companc, PifCo also provided PIB BV with a
loan for U.S.$724.5 million, with an interest rate of 4.79%. |
|
|
|
|
U.S.$134.6 million in Global Step-up Notes due April 2008. The notes bear interest
from March 31, 2003 at a rate of 12.375% per year until April 1, 2006 and at a rate of
12.375% per year thereafter, with interest payable semiannually. On April 1, 2006, the
noteholders had the right to exercise a put option and require PifCo to repurchase the
notes, in whole or in part, at par value. Noteholders have not exercised this put
option. PifCo used the proceeds from this issuance principally to repay trade-related
debt and inter-company loans. On July 24, 2006 these notes were tendered in the amount
of U.S.$265.4 million. |
|
|
|
|
U.S.$464.4 million (U.S.$65.0 million current portion) in connection with our
exports prepayment program. On December 21, 2001, the Trust (PF Export) issued to PFL,
PifCos subsidiary, U.S.$750 million of Senior Trust Certificates in four series and
U.S.$150 million of Junior Trust Certificates. In addition, on May 13, 2003, the Trust
issued U.S.$550 million in 6.436% Senior Trust Certificates due 2015, and on May 14,
2003, the Trust issued U.S.$200 million in 3.748% Senior Trust Certificates due 2013
and an additional U.S.$150 million of Junior Trust Certificates. In May 2004, PFL and
the PF Export Trust executed an amendment to the Trust Agreement allowing the Junior
Trust Certificates to be set-off against the related Notes, rather than paid in full,
after fulfillment of all obligations pursuant to the Senior Trust Certificates. The
effect of this amendment is that amounts related to the Junior Trust Certificates are
now presented net, rather than gross in PifCos consolidated financial statements, and
thus U.S.$150 million has been reduced from the current portion of long term debt and
from the long-term debt liability caption with respect to sales of rights to future
receivables, with a similar reduction to the asset line item assets related to export
prepayments. |
On September 1, 2005, PFL prepaid the floating rate Senior Trust Certificates (Series A2 and
C) in accordance with the applicable provisions of the governing agreements. In order to
facilitate this advance payment, we prepaid to PFL an amount of U.S.$330.3 million related to the
export prepayment program.
On March 1, 2006, PFL prepaid the fixed rate Senior Trust Certificates (Series A1 and B), in
accordance with the applicable provisions of the governing agreements, in the amount of U.S.$333.9
million.
On May 26, 2006, PFL successfully completed a solicitation of consents from holders of the
Series 2003-A 6.436% Senior Trust Certificates due 2015 issued by PF Export Receivables Master
Trust. The amendments sought
112
to eliminate exports of bunker fuel from the transaction so that the securities have been
collateralized only by receivables from sales of fuel oil exported by us and to reduce the minimum
average daily gross exports of fuel oil for any rolling twelve-month period. PFL also obtained the
consent from the holders of Series 2003-B 3.748% due 2013. The amendments became effective on June
1, 2006.
As a result of these amendments, the premium rate of the guarantee of the Series 2003-B was
reduced from 1.8% to 1.1%.
|
|
|
U. S.$2,181.4 million in Global Notes, of which U.S.$500 million were issued on July
2, 2003 and are due July 2013. The notes bear interest at the rate of 9.125% per year,
payable semi-annually. In September 2003, PifCo issued an additional U.S.$250 million
in Global Notes, which form a single fungible series with PifCos U.S.$500 million
Global Notes due July 2013. The proceeds from these issuances were used principally to
repay trade-related debt and inter-company loans. On July 24, 2006 these notes were
tendered in the amount of U.S.$251.7 million. On December 10, 2003, PifCo issued an
additional U.S.$750 million of Global Notes due December 2018. The notes bear interest
at the rate of 8.375% per year, payable semiannually. On July 24, 2006 these notes were
tendered in the amount of U.S.$173.2 million. In September 2004, PifCo issued an
additional U.S.$600 million of Global Notes due 2014. The notes bear interest at the
rate of 7.75% per year, payable semiannually. The proceeds from the issuance of these
notes were used principally for general corporate purposes, including the financing of
the purchase of oil product imports and the repayment of existing trade-related debt
and inter-company loans. On October 6, 2006, PifCo issued Global Notes of U.S.$500,000
due October 2016. The notes bear interest at the rate of 6.125% per year, payable
semiannually. PifCo used the proceeds from this issuance principally to repay
trade-related debt and inter-company loans. |
|
|
|
|
U.S.$293.9 million (¥35 billion) in Japanese Yen Bonds issued on September 2006 and
due to September 2016. The issue was a private placement in the Japanese market with a
partial guarantee by the Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) and its main
purposes were to retap the Japanese market, access a new investors base and reduce the
financial cost. The bonds bear interest at the rate of 2.15% per year, payable
semiannually. On the same date, PifCo entered into a swap agreement with Citibank,
swapping the total amount of this debt to a U.S. dollar denominate debt. |
On December 31, 2006, PifCo had available standby committed facilities in the amount of
U.S.$675 million, which are not specific as to use requirements. PifCo has no drawdown
amounts related to these facilities and, as of the date of this filing, has not scheduled a date
for the drawdown.
113
The following table sets forth the sources of PifCos current and long-term debt at December
31, 2006 and December 31, 2005:
CURRENT AND LONG-TERM DEBT
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars) |
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
Current |
|
|
Long-term |
|
Financing institutions |
|
|
U.S.$329.2 |
|
|
|
U.S.$1,041.2 |
|
|
|
U.S.$493.6 |
|
|
|
U.S.$1,194.7 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
533.9 |
|
|
|
524.6 |
|
|
|
53.5 |
|
|
|
1,550.0 |
|
Global step-up notes |
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
134.6 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
400.0 |
|
Global notes |
|
|
32.7 |
|
|
|
2,181.4 |
|
|
|
26.3 |
|
|
|
2,115.3 |
|
Sale of right to future
receivables |
|
|
68.4 |
|
|
|
614.4 |
|
|
|
567.4 |
|
|
|
679.4 |
|
Senior exchangeable notes |
|
|
333.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
329.9 |
|
Japanese yen bonds |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
293.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets related to export
prepayment to be offset
against sales of rights to
future receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150.0 |
) |
|
|
(150.0 |
) |
|
|
(150.0 |
) |
Repurchased securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(210.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$1,303.8 |
|
|
|
U.S.$4,640.1 |
|
|
|
U.S.$998.8 |
|
|
|
U.S.$5,908.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extinguished securities
On December 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we had amounts invested abroad in an exclusive
investment fund that held debt securities of some of our group companies in the amount of U.S.$245
million and U.S.$2,078 million, respectively. Once these securities are purchased by the fund, the
related amounts, together with applicable interest, are removed from the presentation of marketable
securities and long-term debt. See Note 12 to our consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2006.
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements
As noted above, all of our project financings are on-balance sheet. As of December 31, 2006,
neither we nor PifCo had off-balance sheet arrangements that have, or are reasonably likely to
have, a material effect on our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations,
liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.
Uses of Funds
Capital Expenditures
In the pursuit of the goals outlined in our strategic plan we continue to prioritize capital
expenditures for the development of crude oil and natural gas production projects through internal
investments and through structured undertakings with partners. We invested a total of U.S.$14,643
million in 2006, a 41.3% increase as compared to our investments in 2005. Our increased capital
expenditures in 2006 were primarily directed towards increasing our production capabilities in the
Campos basin, modernizing our refineries and expanding our pipeline transportation and distribution
systems. Of the total amount of capital expenditures in 2006, U.S.$7,329 million was made in
connection with exploration and development projects mainly in the Campos basin (50.1%), which
includes investments financed through project financing structures. PifCo primarily utilizes funds
to finance its oil trading activities.
114
The following table sets forth our consolidated capital expenditures (including project
financings and investments in gas-fired power plants) for each of our business segments for 2006,
2005 and 2004:
CONSOLIDATED CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars) |
|
Exploration and Production |
|
$ |
7,329 |
|
|
$ |
6,127 |
|
|
$ |
4,574 |
|
Supply |
|
|
1,936 |
|
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
|
1,367 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Gas and Power |
|
|
1,664 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and Production |
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
Supply |
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Gas and Power |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
14,643 |
|
|
$ |
10,365 |
|
|
$ |
7,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On June 30, 2006, we announced our Business Plan, which contemplates total budgeted capital
expenditures of U.S.$87.1 billion from 2007 to 2011, approximately U.S.$74.9 billion of which will
be directed towards our activities in Brazil, while U.S.$12.2 billion will be directed to our
activities abroad. We expect that the majority of our capital expenditures from 2007 to 2011,
approximately U.S.$49.2 billion, will be directed towards exploration and production, of which
U.S.$40.7 billion is slated for our activities in Brazil.
Our Business Plan through 2011 contemplates greater domestic expenditures in our construction
activities and other projects. We estimate that of the U.S.$74.9 billion in domestic capital
expenditures through 2011, at least U.S.$49.8 billion (66%) will be utilized to pay for equipment
and services provided by Brazilian contractors, suppliers and other service providers.
Our capital expenditures budget for the year 2007, including our project financings, is
U.S.$23.7 billion, allocated among each of our business segments as follows: (i) Exploration and
Production: U.S.$11.2 billion; (ii) Supply: U.S.$4.4 billion; (iii) International: U.S.$3.0
billion; (iv) Gas and Power: U.S.$4.1 billion; (v) Distribution: U.S.$0.4 billion; and (vi)
Corporate: U.S.$0.6 billion.
We plan to meet our budgeted capital expenditures primarily through internally generated cash
and issuances in the international capital markets. Our actual capital expenditures may vary
substantially from the projected numbers set forth above as a result of market conditions and the
cost and availability of the necessary funds.
Dividends
In
2006 we paid dividends of approximately U.S.$3,213 million (U.S.$0.73 per share).
Approximately 76% of such amount was paid in the form of interest on capital.
On April 2, 2007, the Ordinary General Meeting approved dividends referring to the year-end
2006, amounting to U.S.$3,693, corresponding to U.S.$0.84 per common and preferred share, including
interest on shareholders equity, for which U.S.$2,052 was made available to the shareholders on
January 4, 2007. This amount corresponds to U.S.$0.47 per share, based on the share position as of
October 31, 2006. U.S.$923 was provided on March 30, 2007, based on the share position as of
December 28, 2006, corresponding to U.S.$0.21 per share. The remaining balance of U.S.$718,
corresponding to U.S.$0.16 per share, was provided within the legal term, on May 17, 2007, based on
the share position as of April 2, 2007.
115
The dividends are restated according to the Selic interest rate from December 31, 2006 to May
17, 2007, the date payment of each portion commenced.
Contractual obligations
Petrobras
The following table summarizes our outstanding contractual obligations at December 31, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period (in millions of U.S. dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than |
|
|
Total |
|
year |
|
1-3 years |
|
3-5 years |
|
5
years |
Contractual Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long Term Debt Obligations |
|
|
12,616 |
|
|
|
2,106 |
|
|
|
2,265 |
|
|
|
2,353 |
|
|
|
5,892 |
|
Pension Fund Obligations (1) |
|
|
17,238 |
|
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
1,887 |
|
|
|
2,274 |
|
|
|
12,247 |
|
Project Financings Obligations |
|
|
6,374 |
|
|
|
2,182 |
|
|
|
2,245 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
Capital (Finance) Lease obligations |
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Balance Sheet Items |
|
|
37,283 |
|
|
|
5,349 |
|
|
|
6,857 |
|
|
|
5,979 |
|
|
|
19,098 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Long-Term Contractual Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural Gas Ship-or-Pay |
|
|
6,467 |
|
|
|
491 |
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
3,992 |
|
Contract Service Obligations |
|
|
8,444 |
|
|
|
3,432 |
|
|
|
3,726 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
Natural Gas Supply Agreements |
|
|
7,577 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
1,227 |
|
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
4,422 |
|
Operating Lease Obligations |
|
|
8,261 |
|
|
|
2,590 |
|
|
|
3,800 |
|
|
|
1,164 |
|
|
|
707 |
|
Purchase Obligations |
|
|
2,736 |
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
964 |
|
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
434 |
|
International Purchase Obligations |
|
|
3,262 |
|
|
|
895 |
|
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
535 |
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Other Long-Term Obligations |
|
|
36,747 |
|
|
|
9,334 |
|
|
|
11,198 |
|
|
|
4,860 |
|
|
|
11,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
74,030 |
|
|
|
14,683 |
|
|
|
18,055 |
|
|
|
10,839 |
|
|
|
30,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
There are plan assets in the amount of U.S.$12,395 million that guarantee the pension plan
obligations. These assets are presented as a reduction to the net actuarial liabilities. See
Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006. |
PifCo
The following table sets forth PifCos contractual obligations as of December 31, 2006, and
the period in which the contractual obligations come due.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by period |
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
less than 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
more than 5 |
|
|
TOTAL |
|
year |
|
1-3 years |
|
3-5 years |
|
years |
Contractual Obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
5,697.6 |
|
|
|
1,057.5 |
|
|
|
988.4 |
|
|
|
704.9 |
|
|
|
2,946.8 |
|
Notes Payable Long-term |
|
|
7,441.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,927.1 |
|
|
|
3,514.6 |
|
Purchase obligations Long-term |
|
|
3,272.8 |
|
|
|
954.6 |
|
|
|
1,129.7 |
|
|
|
528.7 |
|
|
|
659.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
16,412.1 |
|
|
|
2,012.1 |
|
|
|
2,118.1 |
|
|
|
5,160.7 |
|
|
|
7,121.2 |
|
116
Stockholders Equity
Capital Increase
In September 2006, we, following the Board of Directors recommendation, changed the
designation of U.S.$120 million in advances for future capital and U.S.$180 million in notes
receivable from PifCo into a capital increase.
Exchange Offering
On January 4, 2007, PifCo announced an offer for the exchange of securities (Exchange
Offering) totaling up to U.S.$500 million for five series of Notes.
The objective of the Exchange was offer to the investors the opportunity to substitute the
five old notes listed below with PifCos new benchmark, issued on October 6, 2006 with a 6.125% per
year coupon and maturity in 2016.
The settlement of the Exchange Offer occurred on February 7, 2007 and as result, PifCo
received and accepted a tender amount of U.S.$399.1 million (face value of the Notes). All the
Notes received were cancelled in the same day and as consequence, PifCo issue U.S.$399.1 million of
Global Notes due 2016 that bear interest at the rate of 6.125% per year, payable semiannually. The
new Notes constitute a single fungible series with the U.S.$500 million Global Notes due 2016
issued in October 2006. In total, there will be U.S.$899.1 in outstanding bonds due 2016. PifCo
also paid to the investors a cash amount equivalent to U.S.$56 million as a result of the Exchange.
The table below presents the result of the Exchange.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
PifCo Old Notes |
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
after Exchange |
|
|
Total Amount Tendered |
|
Global Step-Up Notes |
|
|
12.375 |
% |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
U.S.$126.9 |
|
|
|
U.S.$7.8 |
|
Senior Notes |
|
|
9.875 |
% |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
224.2 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
Senior Notes |
|
|
9.750 |
% |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
235.4 |
|
|
|
51.0 |
|
Global Notes |
|
|
9.125 |
% |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
374.2 |
|
|
|
124.1 |
|
Global Notes |
|
|
7.750 |
% |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
397.9 |
|
|
|
202.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$1,358.6 |
|
|
|
U.S.$399.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
PifCo New Notes |
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
after Exchange |
|
|
Total Reopened |
|
Global Notes |
|
|
6.125 |
% |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
U.S.$899.1 |
|
|
|
U.S.$399.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$899.1 |
|
|
|
U.S.$399.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The following discussion describes those areas that require the most judgment or involve a
higher degree of complexity in the application of the accounting policies that currently affect our
financial condition and results of operations. The accounting estimates we make in these contexts
require us to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain. In each case, if we had
made other estimates, or if changes in the estimates occur from period to period, our financial
condition and results of operations could be materially affected.
The discussion addresses only those estimates that we consider most important based on the
degree of uncertainty and the likelihood of a material impact if we used a different estimate.
There are many other areas in which we use estimates about uncertain matters, but the reasonably
likely effect of changed or different estimates is not material to our financial presentation.
Oil and Gas Reserves
Evaluations of oil and gas reserves are important for the effective management of upstream
assets. They are used to make investment decisions about oil and gas properties. Oil and gas
reserve quantities are also used as the basis for calculation of unit-of-production rates for
depreciation and evaluation for impairment. Oil and gas reserves are divided between proved and
unproved reserves. Proved reserves are estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas and natural
gas liquids that geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be
recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating conditions,
i.e., prices and costs as of the date the estimate is made. Unproved reserves are those with less
than reasonable certainty of recoverability and are classified as either probable or possible.
Probable reserves are reserves that are more likely to be recovered than not and possible reserves
are less likely to be recovered than not.
The estimation of proved reserves is an ongoing process that takes into account engineering
and geological information such as well logs, pressure data and fluid sample core data. Proved
reserves can also be divided in two categories: developed and undeveloped. Developed proved
reserves are expected to be recovered from existing wells including line pack, or when the costs
necessary to put them in production are relatively low. For undeveloped proved reserves,
significant investments are necessary, including drilling new wells and installing production or
transportation facilities.
We use the successful efforts method to account for our exploration and production
activities. Under this method, costs are accumulated on a field-by-field basis with certain
exploratory expenditures and exploratory dry holes being expensed as incurred. Exploratory wells
that find oil and gas in an area requiring major capital expenditure before production can begin
are evaluated annually to ensure that commercial quantities of reserves have been found or that
additional exploration work is under way or planned in a timeframe reasonable for the Petrobras
development cycle and with consideration to ANP timing requirements. Exploratory well costs not
meeting either of these criteria are charged to expense. Costs of productive wells and development
dry holes are capitalized and amortized on the unit-of-production method because it provides a more
timely accounting of the success or failure of our exploration and production activities.
Impact of Oil and Gas Reserves on Depreciation and Depletion
The calculation of unit-of-production depreciation and depletion is a critical accounting
estimate that measures the depreciation and depletion of upstream assets. It is the ratio of (1)
actual volumes produced to (2) total proved developed reserves (those proved reserves recoverable
through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods) applied to (3) asset cost.
Proved undeveloped reserves are considered in the amortization of leasehold acquisition costs. The
volumes produced and asset cost are known and while proved developed reserves have a high
probability of recoverability they are based on estimates that are subject to some variability.
This variability may result in net upward or downward revisions of proved reserves in existing
fields, as more information becomes available through research and production. We revised our
proved reserves in the last three years, increasing our proved reserves by 425.5 million barrels of
oil equivalent in 2006, increasing our proved reserves by 258.4 million barrels of oil equivalent
in 2005 and decreasing our proved reserves by 431.3 million barrels of oil equivalent in 2004.
118
Impact of Oil and Gas Reserves and Prices on Testing for Impairment
At December 31, 2006, our property, plant, and equipment, net of accumulated depletion,
amounted to U.S.$59 billion. A substantial part of this amount consisted of oil and gas producing
properties. These properties are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may not be recoverable. We estimate the future and
discounted cash flows of the affected properties to judge the recoverability of carrying amounts.
In general, analyses are based on proved reserves, except in circumstances where it is probable
that additional non-proved reserves will be developed and contribute to cash flows in the future;
the percentage of probables that we include in cash flows does not exceed our past success ratios
in developing probable reserves.
We perform asset valuation analyses on an ongoing basis as a part of our management program.
These analyses monitor the performance of assets against corporate objectives. They also assist us
in reviewing whether the carrying amounts of any of our assets may not be recoverable. In addition
to estimating oil and gas reserve volumes in conducting these analyses, it is also necessary to
estimate future oil and gas prices.
In general, we do not view temporarily low oil prices as a trigger event for conducting
impairment tests. The markets for crude oil and natural gas have a history of significant price
volatility. Although prices will occasionally drop precipitously, industry prices over the long
term will continue to be driven by market supply and demand fundamentals. Accordingly, any
impairment tests that we perform make use of our long-term price assumptions for the crude oil and
natural gas markets. These are the same price assumptions that are used in our planning and
budgeting processes and our capital investment decisions, and they are considered to be reasonable,
conservative estimates given market indicators and past experience. Significantly lower future oil
and gas prices could lead to impairments in the future, if such decreases were considered to be
indicative of long-term trends. In addition, significant changes in production curve expectation,
discount and/or required production and lifting costs, could affect impairment analysis. While such
uncertainties are inherent to this estimation process, the amount of impairment charges in past
years has been small relative to the total value of oil and gas producing properties: U.S.$21
million in 2006, U.S.$156 million in 2005 and U.S.$65 million in 2004. Based on our experience, we
believe that future variability in estimates will have a small impact on both assets and expense.
Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefits
The determination of the expense and liability relating to our pension and other
post-retirement benefits involves the use of judgment in the determination of actuarial
assumptions. These include estimates of future mortality, withdrawal, changes in compensation and
discount rate to reflect the time value of money as well as the rate of return on plan assets.
These assumptions are reviewed at least annually and may differ materially from actual results due
to changing market and economic conditions, regulatory events, judicial rulings, higher or lower
withdrawal rates or longer or shorter life spans of participants.
According to the requirements of SFAS 87, and subsequent interpretations, the discount rate
should be based on present value for settling the pension obligation. The use of the precepts of
SFAS 87 in Brazil, which has been subject to inflation from time to time, creates certain issues to
the extent that the ability for a company to settle a pension obligation at a future point in time
may not exist because long-term financial instruments of suitable grade may not exist locally.
Although the Brazilian market has been demonstrating signs of stabilization as reflected in
market interest rates, interest rates may be unstable.
In 2004, our Executive Board approved a change to the mortality table relating to actuarial
assumptions of our pension and healthcare plans in Brazil. This new mortality table reflects
changes with respect to the profile of employees, retirees and pensioners, based on longevity, age
of invalidity and invalid mortality tables. The main purpose of the change was to strengthen our
benefit plans in light of a more accurate evaluation of the greater life expectancy of the plan
beneficiaries.
The progressive increase in longevity has direct impact on the plans estimated and
provisioned volume of commitments and obligations and in our liabilities under the line Employees
post-retirement benefits obligation
119
Pension and our shareholders equity under the line Postretirement benefit reserves
adjustments net of tax pension cost.
The change of the mortality table has been affecting the results for the years subsequent to
2004 due to an increase of expenses related to the interest costs and amortization of
Postretirement benefit reserves adjustments net of tax pension.
Postretirement benefit reserves adjustments net of tax pension cost are values calculated
as the difference between the forecasted restatement of the net value of the obligations according
to the actuarial assumptions and the variations effectively occurring over time. These amounts are
to be amortized and posted to the results of subsequent fiscal years over the average life
expectancy of the pension plans members.
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158 Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Post-retirement Plans an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and
132(R), which became effective for us on December 31, 2006. This standard requires that we
recognize the over funded or under funded status of each of our defined benefit pension and other
post-retirement benefit plans as an asset or liability and to reflect changes in the funded status
through Accumulated other comprehensive income, as a separate component of stockholders equity.
Upon adoption of SFAS 158, as of December 31, 2006 the liabilities related to pension plan
increased by U.S.$131 million and the liabilities related to health care increased by U.S.$1,495
million. The stockholders equity reduced by U.S.$1,083 million, net of income taxes (See Note 16
(d) to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006).
Litigation, Tax Assessments and Other Contingencies
Claims for substantial amounts have been made against us arising in the normal course of
business. We are sometimes held liable for spills and releases of oil products and chemicals from
our operating assets. In accordance with the guidance provided by U.S. GAAP, we accrued for these
costs when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and reasonable estimates of the
liability can be made. At December 31, 2006, we had accrued U.S.$233 million for litigation
contingencies. Significant management judgment is required to comply with this guidance and it
includes managements discussion with our attorneys, taking into account all of the relevant facts
and circumstances. We believe that payments required to settle the amounts related to these claims,
in case of loss, will not vary significantly from our estimated costs, and thus will not have a
material adverse effect on our operations or cash flows. In past periods, the difference between
the actual payout and the amount of the provision liability, with respect to contingency
estimation, has been insignificant, with no material income statement impact in the period of the
payout. In the last five years, our annual cash payouts for contingencies relating to claims
against us, the parent company, reached an average of U.S.$68 million per year.
Asset Retirement Obligations and Environmental Remediation
Under various contracts, permits and regulations, we have material legal obligations to remove
equipment and restore the land or seabed at the end of operations at production sites. Our most
significant asset removal obligations involve removal and disposal of offshore oil and gas
production facilities worldwide. We accrue the estimated discounted costs of dismantling and
removing these facilities at the time of installation of the assets. We also estimate costs for
future environmental clean-up and remediation activities based on current information on costs and
expected plans for remediation. The aggregate amount of estimated costs on a discounted basis for
asset retirement and environmental remediation provision at December 31, 2006 was U.S.$1,473
million. Estimating asset retirement, removal and environmental remediation costs requires
performing complex calculations that necessarily involve significant judgment because our
obligations are many years in the future, the contracts and regulation have vague descriptions of
what removal and remediation practices and criteria will have to be met when the removal and
remediation events actually occur and asset removal technologies and costs are constantly changing,
along with political, environmental, safety and public relations considerations. Consequently, the
timing and amounts of future cash flows are subject to significant uncertainty. However, given the
significant amount of time to the ultimate retirement date, any modifications in technological
specifications, legal requirement, or other matters, would not have a materially adverse effect on
any one reporting period.
120
In 2006, we reviewed and revised our estimated costs associated with well abandonment and the
demobilization of oil and gas production areas, considering new information about date of expected
abandonment and revised cost estimates to abandon. The changes to estimated asset retirement
obligation were principally related to changing expectations about Brent prices, which led the
correlated fields to have longer economic lives. This review resulted in a decrease in the related
provision of U.S.$112 million with a gain recognized in net income, and recorded in the line titled
exploratory costs for oil and gas exploration. See note 9(d) to our audited consolidated financial
statements, as of December 31, 2006.
Derivative transactions
SFAS 133 requires that we recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the
balance sheet and measure those instruments at fair value. Accounting for derivative transactions
requires us to employ judgment to arrive at assumptions to compute fair market values, which are
used as the basis for recognition of the derivative instruments in the financial statements. Such
measurement may depend on the use of estimates such as estimated future prices, long term interest
rates and inflation indexes, and becomes increasingly complex when the instrument being valued does
not have counterparts with similar characteristics traded in an active market.
In the course of our business we have entered into contracts that meet the definition of
derivatives under SFAS 133, certain of which have not qualified to receive hedge accounting. For
the majority of these contracts, the estimates involved in the calculations for the fair value of
such derivative instruments have not been considered likely to have a material impact in our
financial position had we used different estimates, due to the majority of our derivative
instruments being traditional over the counter instruments with short term maturities.
Impact of New Accounting Standards
SFAS No. 157
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS
157), which will become effective for us on January 1, 2008. This standard defines fair value,
establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value
measurements. SFAS 157 does not require any new fair value measurements but would apply to assets
and liabilities that are required to be recorded at fair value under other accounting standards.
The impact, if any, to us from the adoption of SFAS 157 in 2008 will depend on our assets and
liabilities at that time that are required to be measured at fair value.
SFAS No. 158
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158 Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Post-retirement Plans an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and
132(R), (SFAS 158), which became effective for us on December 31, 2006. This standard requires
that we recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of each of our defined benefit pension and
other post-retirement benefit plans as an asset or liability and to reflect changes in the funded
status through Accumulated other comprehensive income, as a separate component of stockholders
equity.
Upon adoption of SFAS 158, as of December 31, 2006 the liabilities related to pension plan
increased by U.S.$131 million and the liabilities related to health care increased by U.S.$1,495
million. The stockholders equity reduced by U.S.$1,083 million, net of income taxes (See Note
16(d) to our consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2006).
SFAS No. 159
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159 The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities. (SFAS 159). SFAS 159 permits the measurement of certain financial
instruments at fair value. Entities may choose to measure eligible items at fair value at specified
election dates, reporting unrealized gains and losses on such items at each subsequent reporting
period. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We are currently
evaluating the potential impact of the fair value option but it is not expected to have a
significant effect on our reported financial position or statements of income.
121
FIN 48
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes, An Interpretation of FASB Statement 109 (FIN 48), that clarifies the accounting for
uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements and prescribes a
threshold of more-likely-than-not for recognition of tax benefits of uncertain tax positions taken
or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides related guidance on measurement,
derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, and disclosure. The provisions of FIN 48
will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2007, with any cumulative effect of the change in
accounting principle recorded as an adjustment to opening retained earnings. We are in the process
of assessing the impact of adopting FIN 48 on our results of operations and financial position. We
do not expect that the adoption of FIN 48 will have a material effect on our financial position or
results from operations.
Research and Development
Since 1966, we have maintained a dedicated research and development facility in Rio de
Janeiro, Brazil. As of December 31, 2006, we had 1,811 employees working in this facility. We
engage in joint research projects with universities and other research centers in Brazil and
abroad. We spent U.S.$179.7 million in 2006 on joint projects with Brazilian universities and
technological institutions, as compared to U.S.$54 million in 2005 and U.S.$32 million in 2004. In
addition, we participate in technology exchange and assistance projects with other oil and gas and
oil field service companies for other areas of our business. These transfers of technology are
based on partnership agreements focusing on the exchange of information with respect to offshore
systems and development of deepwater technologies and involve no material cost to us.
Our research and development facility researches various aspects of our oil and gas
operations, including exploration, drilling, production, reservoir engineering and geology, fluid
separation, well completion and refining process technology. This facility also engages in research
on industrial catalysts, lubricants, fine chemicals, fuels, additives, petrochemicals and polymers
for other areas of our business. Our research facility is also responsible for the basic design of
new offshore fixed and semi-submersible platforms and sub-sea production systems, as well as new
and reconstructed refining units, and has facilitated the development of important technologies,
including semi-submersible production platforms capable of operating in water depths of up to 3,000
meters (9,843 feet).
As of December 31, 2006, we had 30 floating production systems in operation (13
semi-submersibles, 16 FPSO and 1 FSO). We have obtained 48 patents in Brazil and 179 abroad for a
significant number of the technologies produced through research and development activities during
the three-year period ended December 31, 2006.
Of the projects in which we are currently involved, three programs are key to our
technological development activities. The first program, originally named PROCAP, is devoted to
deepwater offshore activities and has been implemented in phases. The first phase, named simply
PROCAP, started in 1986, to research deepwater technology to enable us to develop fields discovered
in water depths up to 1,000m (3,281ft), aiming at development in the recently discovered fields of
Albacora and Marlim, at the Campos basin. In 1992, after successful conclusion and implementation
of the first phase, we launched the second phase, PROCAP 2000, which pursued the same objectives of
PROCAP but for depths up to 2,000m (6,562ft), by the year 2000. Following the discovery of the
Roncador field, the third phase, PROCAP 3000, was started in 2000, with a budget of U.S.$128
million over five years to provide technological solutions to produce and support the development
of ultra-deep water fields, in water as deep as 3,000m (9,843ft). The targets were the next phases
of development of Marlim Sul, Roncador, Marlim Leste, Albacora Leste, Jubarte, the deep and
ultra-deep blocks of the Santos and Espírito Santo basins, the Gulf of Mexico and West Africa, in
order to achieve production and extraction in water depths up to 3,000 meters (9,843 feet).
The second program, the Renewable Energy Technology Program PROGER was created in 2004 to
promote the research and development of technologies to enable and optimize the use of renewable
energy sources. Such sources provide light, heating, air conditioning, mechanical force,
transportation, telecommunications and fuel with minimum impact to the environment, reducing the
effects of world climate changes caused by the use of hydrocarbons. The challenge we face with this
program is to make the use of such energy sources more economical and to enable their widespread
use. This program focuses on the research and development of wind energy, solar
122
energy, biomass energy, bio-fuels (including bio-diesel), and energy from the sea and
geo-thermal energy, among other sources.
The third program, the Strategic Refining Technological ProgramPROTER, was created in 1994 to
develop heavy crude oil refining technologies to optimize the capacity of existing facilities and
to increase the bottom of the barrel conversion. This program has a portfolio of projects targeting
the development of new technologies and the optimization of existing ones for our domestic heavy
oil refining in a cost-effective way. We have been making substantial investments to accomplish
this goal to provide the market with premium fuels and high added value products. These
developments are carried out in our modern labs and pilot plants and sometimes a prototype
technology evaluation is also needed before availability for industrial use. Many innovations
developed under this program have been implemented in our refineries. In addition to these
programs, we have developed several other programs designed to:
|
|
|
decrease and control the environmental impact caused by our activities; |
|
|
|
|
increase our oil reserves and production through the improvement of our oil recovery levels; |
|
|
|
|
reduce the geological risk and the exploration costs associated with the exploration
of hydrocarbons; |
|
|
|
|
create oil products meeting new market demands and stricter environmental controls; |
|
|
|
|
improve the reliability, performance and duration of pipelines and reduce the
operational costs, investments and risks associated with pipelines; |
|
|
|
|
improve refining systems and procedures to reduce the costs associated with refining; |
|
|
|
|
develop technologies for the exploration and production of heavy oils in offshore fields; |
|
|
|
|
promote the use of natural gas; and |
|
|
|
|
provide and anticipate technological solutions and knowledge in physical and
numerical simulations of geological processes, and in data base management of
parameters for basin modeling. |
Among PROTER projects, we highlight the research on the HBIO process, which were successfully
concluded in laboratory and pilot studies during 2006. This technology introduces a renewable oil
source in diesel fuel production, taking advantage of existing plants. The HBIO process involves a
hydroconversion of the mixture of diesel fractions and vegetable oil. The converted product
contributes to improve the diesel pool quality in the refinery, mainly increasing the cetane
number, and reducing the sulphur content and density. The diesel pool quality upgrade will be a
consequence of the percentage of vegetable oil used in the HBIO process. Our HBIO technology
introduces a new way to include renewable feedstocks for bio-fuels production in addition to the
Brazilian Biodiesel Program, which is progressing, due to a fast track development plan. In 2007,
the HBIO process will be tested on an industrial scale in several of our refineries.
PifCo does not engage in research and development.
Market Trend
Crude oil prices
International oil prices increased at a record rate in 2006. The main factors driving this
price increase include:
|
|
|
the substantial growth in demand for oil products, with little impact resulting from
the oil price increase; |
|
|
|
|
increased pressure on oil production and refining facilities; and |
123
|
|
|
conflicts in the Middle East. |
Although our oil prices are influenced by international oil prices, the price we charge for
oil is generally lower than Brent prices. The main reasons for such spread relate to the fact that
the oil we produce is heavier, which requires more refining expenses, and there is less refining
capacity available capable of processing our heavy oil.
Oil products prices
The prices for fuel oil did not grow as much as other oil products. With the increase in
demand for oil products, refineries used more heavy oil that produces more residues, including fuel
oil, than light oil. Because the demand was concentrated on light and medium oil products, there
was an excess supply of fuel oil. This generated an increase in the price difference between heavy
and light oil products, and consequently, in heavy and light crudes.
Refining
The use of substantially all available refining capacity in 2006 resulted in a year of record
profit margins for the refining industry, despite new specifications for oil products and the
substitution of MTBE (methyl tertiary-butyl ether) in the U.S. refining industry.
We expect that several of the structural factors contributing to growth in demand in 2006 will
continue to influence the market. As a result, we believe that the trends described above will
continue over the next few years.
For a description of other trends that might affect our financial condition and results of
operation, see Item 4. Information on the CompanyCompetition.
ITEM 6. DIRECTORS, SENIOR MANAGEMENT AND EMPLOYEES
Directors and Senior Management
Directors of Petrobras
Our board of directors is composed of a minimum of five and a maximum of nine members and is
responsible for, among other things, establishing our general business policies. The members of the
board of directors are elected at the annual general meeting of shareholders.
Under Brazilian Corporate Law, shareholders representing at least 10% of the companys voting
capital have the right to demand that a cumulative voting procedure be adopted to entitle each
common share to as many votes as there are board members and to give each common share the right to
vote cumulatively for only one candidate or to distribute its votes among several candidates.
Furthermore, our bylaws enable (i) minority preferred shareholders that together hold at least
10% of the total capital stock (excluding the controlling shareholders) to elect and remove one
member to our board of directors; and (ii) minority common shareholders to elect one member to our
board of directors, if a greater number of directors is not elected by such minority shareholders
by means of the cumulative voting procedure. Our bylaws provide that, regardless of the rights
above granted to minority shareholders, the Brazilian government always has the right to elect the
majority of our directors, independently of their number. In addition, as per Law 10,683, dated May
28, 2003, one of the Board members elected by the Brazilian government must be indicated by the
Minister of Planning Budget and Management. The maximum term for a director is one year,
but re-election is permitted. In accordance with the Brazilian Corporate Law, the shareholders may
remove any director from office at any time with or without cause at an extraordinary meeting of
shareholders. Following an election of board members under the cumulative vote procedure, the
removal of any board member by an extraordinary meeting of shareholders will result in the removal
of all the other members, after which new elections must be held.
124
We currently have nine directors. The following table sets forth certain information with
respect to these directors:
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PETROBRAS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Date of Birth |
|
Position |
|
Current Term |
|
Business Address |
Dilma Vana Rousseff (1)
|
|
Dec. 14, 1947
|
|
Chair
|
|
March 2008
|
|
Casa Civil Praça dos Três Poderes Palácio do
Planalto 4º andar
Salas 57 e 58
Brasília DF
Cep 70.150-900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Silas Rondeau Cavalcanti
Silva (1)
|
|
Dec. 15, 1952
|
|
Member
|
|
March 2008
|
|
Esplanada dos Ministérios Bloco U 8º andar Sala 809
Brasília DF
Cep 70.065-900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guido Mantega (1)
|
|
Apr. 7, 1949
|
|
Member
|
|
March 2008
|
|
Esplanada dos Ministérios Bloco P 5o andar
Brasília DF
Cep 70.048-900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.S. Gabrielli de Azevedo (1)
|
|
Oct. 3, 1949
|
|
Member
|
|
March 2008
|
|
Avenida República do Chile, nº 65 23º andar
Rio de Janeiro RJ
Cep 20.031-912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Francisco Roberto de
Albuquerque
|
|
May, 17, 1937
|
|
Member
|
|
March 2008
|
|
Alameda Carolina, 594
Itú São Paulo
Cep 13.306-410 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arthur Antonio Sendas (1)
|
|
Jun. 16, 1935
|
|
Member
|
|
March 2008
|
|
Rodovia Presidente Dutra, 4.674
São João de Meriti RJ
Cep 25.565-350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Roger Agnelli (1)
|
|
May 3, 1959
|
|
Member
|
|
March 2008
|
|
Rua Graça Aranha, 26 18º andar
Rio de Janeiro RJ
Cep 20.030-900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fabio Colletti Barbosa (2)
|
|
Oct. 3, 1954
|
|
Member
|
|
March 2008
|
|
Av. Paulista, 1.374 3º andar Cerqueira César
São Paulo SP
Cep 01310-916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jorge Gerdau Johannpeter (3)
|
|
Dec. 8, 1936
|
|
Member
|
|
March 2008
|
|
Av. Farrapos, 1.811
Porto Alegre RS
Cep 90.220-005 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Appointed by the controlling shareholder. |
|
(2) |
|
Appointed by the minority common shareholders. |
|
(3) |
|
Appointed by the minority preferred shareholders. |
Dilma Vana Rousseff Ms. Rousseff has been the Chair of the Board of Directors of
Petrobras and Petrobras Distribuidora S.A. BR since January 3, 2003. She has been the Chief State
Minister of the Civil Cabinet of the Presidency of the Republic of Brazil since June 14, 2005. She
is a member of the Conselho de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social CDES (Economic and Social
Development Council), an advisory body to the Brazilian Government. She served as: Minister of
Mines and Energy of Brazil (2003-2005); State Secretary of Energy, Mines and Communications of the
State of Rio Grande do Sul (1993-1994 and 1999-2002); President of the Fundação de Economia e
Estatística do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (Economy and Statistics Foundation of the State of Rio
Grande do Sul, 1991-1993); and Secretary of Finance of Porto Alegre (1986-1988). Ms. Rousseff has
participated, as Coordinator of the Infrastructure Group, in the previous Governmental Transition
Team, which was created to facilitate the transition of power to the current government. Ms.
Rousseff has a Bachelors Degree in Economics from the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
(1977), a Masters Degree in Economic Theory from the University of Campinas, São Paulo (1979) and
is currently pursuing a Doctorate Degree in Monetary and Financial Economy at the University of
Campinas.
125
Silas Rondeau Cavalcante Silva Mr. Silva has been a member of our Board of Directors since
April 3, 2006 and is also a member of the Board of Directors of Petrobras Distribuidora S.A. BR.
He has been the Minister of Mines and Energy of Brazil since July 8, 2005. In addition, he is the
Chairman of the Boards of Directors of Centrais Elétricas Brasileiras S.A. ELETROBRÁS and Empresa
de Pesquisas Energética EPE (Energy Research Enterprise), companies linked to the Brazilian
Ministry of Mines and Energy, and a member of the Board of Directors of Itaipu Binacional. Mr.
Silva has a degree in Electrical Engineering from the Federal University of Pernambuco (UFPE) and a
specialized degree in Transmission Lines Engineering from the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro
(UFRJ). Mr. Silva served as the President of Eletrobras (2004-2005), Eletronorte (2003-2004),
Manaus Energia (2000-2002), Energy Company of Amazonas (2000-2002) and Boa Vista Energia
(2002-2003).
Guido Mantega Mr. Mantega has been a member of our Board of Directors since April 3, 2006
and is also a member of the Board of Directors of Petrobras Distribuidora S.A. BR. He has been
the Minister of Finance of Brazil since March 28, 2006. He is a member of the Conselho de
Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social CDES (Economic and Social Development Council), an advisory
body to the Brazilian Government. Mr. Mantega received a Bachelors Degree in Economics from the
School of Economics and Administration of the University of São Paulo in 1971 and a PhD in
Development Sociology from the Philosophy, Sciences and Liberal Arts School at the University of
São Paulo, and completed specialized studies at the Institute of Development Studies (IDS) at the
University of Sussex, England in 1977. He was a Professor of Economics at the Catholic University
of São Paulos (PUC-SP) Master and PhD programs from 1982 to 1987 and Deputy Dean of the Catholic
University of São Paulo (PUC-SP) from 1984 to 1987. He was the Budget Director and Chief of Staff
of the São Paulo Municipal Planning Secretariat from 1989 to 1992, a member of the Workers Party
(PT) Economic Program Coordinating Group in the 1984, 1989 and 1998 Presidential elections,
Economic Advisor to President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva from 1993 to 2002, and one of the Workers
Party (PT) Economic Program coordinators in the 2002 Presidential Campaign. Mr. Mantega was also a
State Minister of Planning, Budget and Management (named in January 2003, post held until November
2004) and President of the Banco Nacional de Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social BNDES (The
Brazilian Development Bank) (named in November 2004, post held until March 2006.)
J.S. Gabrielli de Azevedo Mr. Gabrielli has been our President and CEO since July 22, 2005.
He previously served as our Chief Financial Officer and Investor Relations Officer (2003-2005).
Presently, he is a member of the Boards of Directors of Petrobras and Petrobras Distribuidora S.A.
- BR. He is also Chairman of the Boards of Directors of other Petrobras subsidiaries in Brazil.
Mr. Gabrielli holds a Ph.D. in Economics from Boston University (1987). He was a Visiting
Researcher at the London School of Economics and Political Science in 2000 and 2001. He is a full
Professor of Economics on leave from the Universidade Federal da Bahia.
Francisco Roberto de Albuquerque Mr. de Albuquerque has been a member of our Board of
Directors since April 2, 2007. He earned a Bachelors degree in Military Sciences from the
Academia Militar das Agulhas Negras (AMAN) in Resende, Rio de Janeiro (1958) and in Economics from
the University of São Paulo (1968), a Masters in Military Sciences from the Escola de
Aperfeiçoamento de Oficiais (1969), and a Phd in Military Sciences from the Escola de Comando e
Estado-Maior do Exército in Rio de Janeiro (1977). Throughout his military career, Mr. de
Albuquerque was awarded 22 national and 16 international medals. As a General Officer, he served in
the following missions, among others: Military Mediator of the peace process between Ecuador and
Peru from 1995 to 1996; Undersecretary of the Brazilian Army in Brasília, Distrito Federal from
1996 to 1997; Secretary General of the Brazilian Army in Brasília, Distrito Federal from 1997 to
2000; Head of the former Services (Logistics) Department in Brasília, Distrito Federal from 2000 to
2001; Information and Technology Secretary in Brasília, Distrito Federal in 2001; Military
Commander of the Southeast region, São Paulo, SP from 2001 to 2002; and Commander of the Brazilian
Army in Brasília, Distrito Federal from 2003 to 2007.
Arthur Antonio Sendas Mr. Sendas has been a member of our Board of Directors since March 29,
2004 and is also a member of the Board of Directors Petrobras Distribuidora S.A. BR. Mr. Sendas
is President of the Grupo Sendas (Sendas S.A.; Sendas Empreendimentos e Participações Ltda.; Sendas
Agropecuária S.A.; Sendas Comércio Exterior S.A.; Casa Show S.A.) and the Board of Directors of
Sendas Distribuidora S.A., which ranks as the leader in the retail sector in the state of Rio de
Janeiro. Sendas Distribuidora S.A., through its various subsidiaries, owns approximately one-half
of the supermarket chain under the following four brand names in the State of Rio de Janeiro:
Sendas, Pão de Açúcar, Extra and ABC Barateiro Comprebem. Mr. Sendas is Vice-President of the
Advisory Council of the Associação Brasileira de Supermercados Abras (Brazilian Supermarkets
Association) and for five years represented the private sector on the Conselho Monetário Nacional -
CMN (National
126
Monetary Council). Mr. Sendas owns significant equity stakes in large shopping centers,
engages in residential and commercial construction projects and organizes coffee exports to the
United States, Europe, Asia and the rest of Latin America, among other activities. Mr. Sendas also
sits on the Advisory Council of Companhia Brasileira de Distribuição Pão de Açúcar, a group that
coordinates the supervision of supermarket chains across 12 Brazilian states, and is a member of
the Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro Development Council.
Roger Agnelli - Mr. Agnelli has been a member of our Board of Directors since April 3, 2006
and is also a member of the Board of Directors of Petrobras Distribuidora S.A. BR. He has been
the CEO and President of Companhia Vale do Rio Doce (CVRD) since July 2001. He was the Chairman of
the Board of Directors of CVRD from May 2000 until July 2001. He joined Bradesco Financial Group in
1981 and stayed until 2001, serving as the Executive Director of Banco Bradesco from 1998 to 2000
and as the CEO and President of Bradespar S.A. from 2000 to 2001. He is a former member of the
Board of Directors of several major companies in Brazil, such as Companhia Paulista de Força e Luz,
Companhia Siderúrgica Nacional, Latas de Alumínio Latasa, VBC Energia, Brasmotor, Mahle Metal
Leve, Rio Grande Energia and Serra da Mesa Energia, and was also a Director of UGB Participações
and Vice-President of the Associação Nacional dos Bancos de Investimento ANBID (Brazils National
Association of Investment Banks). He is a member of the Boards of Directors of ABB (Asea Brown
Boveri), Spectra Energy Corporation, and Suzano Petroquímica. He is a member of the Conselho de
Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social CDES (Economic and Social Development Council), an advisory
body to the Brazilian Government, and a member of the International Investments Council, formed to
advise the President of South Africa, Dr.Thabo Mbeki. He recently became a member of the
International Advisory Committee of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). Mr. Agnelli earned a
Bachelors Degree in Economics from Fundação Armando Álvares Penteado (Armando Álvares Penteado
Foundation), in São Paulo, Brazil, in 1981.
Fabio Colletti Barbosa Mr. Barbosa has been a member of our Board of Directors since January
3, 2003 and is also a member of the Board of Directors of Petrobras Distribuidora S.A. BR. He is
the Chief Executive Officer of the ABN AMRO Bank Latin America and Chief Executive Officer of the
Banco ABN Amro Real S.A. He served as: Chief Executive Officer of ABN Amro Bank/São Paulo
(1996-1998); Director of Corporate Banking & Finance of ABN Amro Bank/São Paulo (1995-1996);
President of LTCB Latin America Ltda. (1992-1995), the Latin American affiliate of the Long Term
Credit Bank of Japan; Corporate Finance Executive Director of Citibank (1986-1992); and member of
the Treasury Department of Nestlé (1974-1986). Mr. Barbosa is also the Chairman of the Board of
Directors and the Executive Board of the Federação Brasileira das Associações de Bancos (Brazilian
Bank Associations Federation-FEBRABAN). Mr. Barbosa has a Bachelors Degree in Management from
Fundação Getúlio Vargas São Paulo (1976) and an MBA from the Institute for Management and
Development Lausanne / Switzerland (1979).
Jorge Gerdau Johannpeter Mr. Johannpeter has been a member of our Board of Directors since
October 19, 2001 and is also a member of the Board of Directors of Petrobras Distribuidora S.A. -
BR. Since 1983, he has been the President of the Gerdau Group, the largest long steel producer of
the Americas. From January 2007 he has no longer served on the Executive Committee, but will retain
his position as President of the Board of Directors of Gerdau Group. Under his leadership, Gerdau
Group became an international company and currently occupies 14th place in the Metal
Bulletin ranking of the largest global steelmakers. Mr. Johannpeter actively participates in
efforts to improve the quality of life in the Americas, and especially in Brazil, the country where
he lives. He coordinates Ação Empresarial (Business Action), one of the most active movements in
Brazil for the implementation of the structural reforms necessary for the countrys growth. He is
the leader of the Programa Gaúcho da Qualidade e Produtividade (Rio Grande do Sul Quality and
Productivity Program), a movement in the area of Total Quality focused on increasing the efficiency
of companies and government entities in Rio Grande do Sul. He is also a member of the Fundação
Nacional da Qualidade FNQ (National Foundation of Quality). Mr. Johannpeter heads the Movimento
Brasil Competitivo (Competitive Brazil Movement), the result of a nation-wide joint effort between
companies and the government that seeks to improve competitiveness in the countrys public and
private sectors. He is the Brazilian representative for the American Society for Quality (ASQ), an
entity that aims to improve business results through the exchange of knowledge. He is a member of
the Board of Directors and Executive Committee of the International Iron and Steel Institute
(IISI), of the Board of the Instituto Brasileiro de Siderurgia IBS (Brazilian Steel Institute),
an entity for which he served as president for two terms, as well as of the Conselho de
Desenvolvimento Econômico e Social CDES (Economic and Social Development Council), an advisory
body to the Brazilian Government. Mr. Johannpeter received a Bachelors degree in Law and Social
Sciences from
127
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (Rio Grande do Sul Federal University), in Porto
Alegre, State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, in 1961.
Directors of PifCo
PifCo is managed by a board of directors, consisting of three members, and by its executive
officers. The board of directors is responsible for preparing PifCos year-end accounts, convening
shareholders meetings and reviewing and monitoring its financial performance and strategy.
Although not required by PifCos memorandum and articles of association, it is PifCos policy that
the Chairman and all of its executive officers be Petrobras employees.
PifCos directors serve indefinite terms and can be removed with or without cause. The
following table sets forth certain information about PifCos board of directors.
BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF PifCo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Date of Birth |
|
Position |
|
Year of Appointment |
Daniel Lima de Oliveira |
|
December 29, 1951 |
|
Chairman |
|
2005 |
Marcos Antonio Silva
Menezes |
|
March 24, 1952 |
|
Director |
|
2003 |
Nilo Carvalho Vieira Filho |
|
October 26, 1954 |
|
Director |
|
2003 |
Daniel Lima de Oliveira. Mr. Lima de Oliveira has been PifCos Chairman and Chief Executive
Officer and Petrobras Executive Manager of Corporate Finance since September 1, 2005. Before this
position, he served as executive officer of PifCo, appointed on April 19, 2000. He joined
Petrobras in 1976 as a supply engineer in the Commercial Department. In 1982 he moved to the
Financial Department where he worked in the short-term credit division and served as Assistant to
the General Manager. From 1984 until 1988, he served as Financial Manager of Petrobras London
office. From 1988 to 1992, Mr. Lima de Oliveira served as manager at Braspetro. From 1992 to 1995,
he served as Long-Term Credit Division Manager at Petrobras Financial Department. From 1995 to
1999, he served as a financial manager of Petrobras New York office. Since January 2002, he has
been a director of Petrobras International Braspetro BV (PIB BV) and Braspetro Oil Services
CompanyBRASOIL and since March 2004 he has been a member of the Board of Directors of REFAP S/A.
Mr. Lima de Oliveira graduated in Mechanical Engineering at São José dos Camposs Industrial
Engineering School in 1975.
Marcos Antonio Silva Menezes. Mr. Menezes has been PifCos Director and Chief Accountant
Officer of Petrobras since 1998. He joined Petrobras in 1976 and served as Deputy Superintendent of
the former SEFIN Financial Services (1995-1998). He currently serves as a member of the Fiscal
Council and of the Audit Committee of BRASKEM S.A. (since 2005), as well as the chairman of the
Fiscal Council of Instituto Brasileiro de Petróleo e Gás (since 1998) and Organização Nacional das
Indústrias de PetróleoONIP (since 1999). He also served as President of the Fiscal Council of
Fundação Petrobras de Seguridade Social PETROS and as a member of the Fiscal Council of Companhia
de Gás de Minas Gerais GASMIG and Bahiagás. Mr. Menezes is currently a Director of the American
Chamber of Commerce AMCHAM/RJ and is a member of Associação Brasileira das Companhias Abertas -
ABRASCA and its Auditing and Accounting Rules Commission CANC. Mr. Menezes graduated in
Accounting (1975) and in Business Management (1977) at Faculdade Moraes Júnior. He has a
specialization from Fundação Dom Cabral INSEAD and a post-graduate degree in Financial Management
from Fundação Getúlio Vargas.
Nilo Carvalho Vieira Filho. Mr. Vieira has been PifCos Executive Manager of Marketing and
Trading since June 25, 2004. He joined Petrobras in March 1985 as a Commercialization and Supply
Analyst. Since then, he has occupied the positions of supply manager at Petrobras (1990-1994), head
of external trading (1995-1998), superintendent of Supply Marketing (1998-1999), Director of
Braspetro (2000-2001) and Director of Eg3 in Argentina (2002-2004). Mr. Vieira graduated in
Mechanical Engineering from the Federal Fluminense University in Rio de Janeiro in 1978.
128
Executive Officers of Petrobras
Our board of executive officers, composed of one president and up to six executive officers,
is responsible for our day-to-day management. Under our bylaws, the board of directors elects the
executive officers, including the president. The president is chosen from among the members of the
board of directors. All of the executive officers are Brazilian nationals and reside in Brazil.
According to our by-laws the election of officers by the Board of Directors must consider their
personal qualification, notorious knowledge and specialization in their respective areas.
The maximum term for executive officers is three years, but re-election is permitted. The
board of directors may remove any executive officer from office at any time with or without cause.
Five of the current executive officers are experienced Petrobras career managers, engineers or
technicians.
The following table sets forth certain information with respect to our executive officers:
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF PETROBRAS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Date of Birth |
|
Position |
|
Current Term |
José Sérgio Gabrielli de Azevedo
|
|
October 3, 1949
|
|
President
|
|
April 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Almir Guilherme Barbassa
|
|
May 19, 1947
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and
Investor Relations Officer
|
|
April 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Renato de Souza Duque
|
|
September 29, 1955
|
|
Manager of Corporate Services
|
|
April 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Guilherme de Oliveira Estrella
|
|
April 18, 1942
|
|
Manager of Exploration and
Production
|
|
April 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paulo Roberto Costa
|
|
January 1, 1954
|
|
Manager of Refining,
Transportation and Marketing
|
|
April 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ildo Luís Sauer
|
|
September 3, 1954
|
|
Manager of Gas and Power
|
|
April 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nestor Cuñat Cerveró
|
|
August 15, 1951
|
|
Manager of International
Activities
|
|
April 2008 |
J. S. Gabrielli de Azevedo. Mr. Gabrielli has been our President since July 2005 and a
member of our board of directors since July 2005. For biographical information regarding Mr.
Gabrielli see Directors and Senior Management of PetrobrasOur Board of Directors.
Almir Guilherme Barbassa. Mr. Barbassa has been our Chief Financial Officer and Investor
Relations Officer since July 22, 2005. He joined Petrobras in 1974 and worked in several financial
and planning capacities, both in Brazil and abroad (Middle East and North Africa) . From
August 1989 to September 1992 he was the Financial Manager of the American subsidiary in Houston,
Texas, oversaw the establishment and consolidation of the company, which explores and produces oil
and gas, trades oil products and does procurement worldwide. From April 1993 he was the Finance
Director of BRASPETRO, the international arm of Petrobras. From July 1999 to July 22, 2005 he was
Petrobras corporate finance and treasury manager of Petrobras. He is former Chairman of Petrobras
International Finance Co., Petrobras Finance Ltd, and Petrobras Netherlands BV, the companies that
carry out Petrobras international financial activities. In addition, he was a professor in the
economics department of the Petrópolis Catholic University and of the Faculdades Integradas Bennett
from 1973 to 1979 and holds a Masters degree in Economics from Getulio Vargas Foundation of Rio de
Janeiro.
Renato de Souza Duque. Mr. Duque has been our Executive Director of Services since January 31,
2003. Currently, Mr. Duque was a member of the boards of directors of Petrobras Energía
Participaciones S.A., Petrobras Energía S.A. until April, 2006 and he is a member of the board of
directors of Petrobras Gás S.A.GASPETRO and Chief Executive Officer of Petrobras Negócios
Eletrônicos S.A. With a degree in Electrical Engineering of the Universidade Federal Fluminense and
an MBA from the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, he has been at our company since 1978 as a
Petroleum Engineer. He has held several positions including: Manager of E&P Human Resources,
Manager of Drilling Operations in the Campos Basin, and Manager of Petrobras Owned Marine Drilling
Rigs.
129
Guilherme de Oliveira Estrella. Mr. Guilherme Estrella graduated in 1966 from the School of
Geology of the Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. At Petrobras, he has been the Managing
Director of Exploration and Production since January 31, 2003. He worked at the company from 1965
to 1994, when he retired as a geologist of the Exploration Department. Before his retirement, he
held several other positions, including: General Superintendent (1989-1993); Superintendent of
Research and Development for Exploration, Drilling and Production (1985-1989); Head of the
Exploration Division (1981-1985); Head of the Organic Geochemistry Sector (1981); Head of the
Brazilian East Coast Basin Interpretation Sector of the Exploration Department DEPEX/RJ
(1978-1981); and Exploration Manager of Petrobras Internacional S.A. BRASPETRO for Iraq
(1976-1978). Mr. Estrella was also a member of the Board of Directors of the controlled companies
in Argentina, Petrobras Energía Participaciones S.A. and Petrobras Energía S.A. until April 28,
2006. He was Director of the Instituto Brasileiro de Petróleo e Gás (Brazilian Oil and Gas
Institute), from 1993 1994, and since 2003, he has been the Chairman of the Board.
Paulo Roberto Costa. Mr. Paulo Roberto has been our Executive Director of Refining,
Transportation and Marketing since May 14, 2004. From 1979 to 1994 he worked on platform
installation and production development at the Campos basin in the areas of Engineering, Support
Management and as Superintendent of the Southeastern Production Region. In 1995 he was promoted to
General Manager of the Southern Brazil Exploration and Production, or E&P, with responsibility for
the Santos and Pelotas basins. In 1996 he became general manager for Logistics in the E&P area.
From May 1997 to 1999 he headed up the Gas Segment, responsible for commercialization of natural
gas. He was Director of Petrobras Gas S.A.-Gaspetro from May 1999 to December 2000. From January
2001 to April 2003, he was General Manager for Logistics at Petrobras of Natural Gas Segment. He
was Managing Director of TBG-Transportadora Brasileira Gasoduto Bolívia-Brasil from April 2003 to
May 2004. In May 14, 2004 he was appointed Downstream Director of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.
Petrobras. Mr. Paulo Roberto graduated in Mechanical Engineering from the Federal University of
Paraná in 1976.
Ildo Luis Sauer. Since January 2003, Dr. Ildo Luís Sauer has been the Gas and Power Director
for Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. PETROBRAS. He graduated in Civil Engineering from Federal University
of Rio Grande do Sul UFRGS (1977). He also holds a Masters degree in Science in Nuclear
Engineering & Energy Planning from COPPE/UFRJ Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (1981). He
obtained a Ph.D. degree in Nuclear Engineering from MIT Massachusetts Institute of Technology
(USA) (1985). He is a full Professor of Energy at USP/IEE, São Paulo University Institute of
Electrotechnical and Energy, where he has taught since 1991. He has supervised more than 40 Master
and Ph.D. degree theses and dissertations and published upwards of 100 scientific papers, articles
and books. Dr. Sauer has rendered consultancy services to private Companies such as Microlab S.A.
He was the Project Manager for the primary nuclear reactor circuit design for the Brazilian Navy
Nuclear Submarine development (1986 to 1989). He served as the President of the University of Sao
Paulo Pos-Graduation Commission and also the Coordinator of USPs Graduation courses in Energy
(1999 to 2003). Dr. Sauer was granted the Energy Personality Award by the São Paulo Engineers
Association and later, received the 2003 Gas Professional of the Year Award during the Fifth
Natural Gas Market Professional Gathering. Over the last fifteen years, he has performed as an
analyst and policy formulator for the Brazilian energy sector, mainly in the electrical energy
industry.
Nestor Cuñat Cerveró. Mr. Cerveró has been our Executive Director of International Business
since January 31, 2003 and was a member of the boards of directors of Petrobras Energía
Participaciones S.A. and Petrobras Energía S.A until April, 2006. He has been with Petrobras since
1975, holding several positions including: Energy Manager, Programa de Termelétricas (gas-fired
power plants program); gas-fired power plants Manager of the Participations Superintendency;
assistant to the CEO for the development of new ventures and partnerships; and Head of the Energy
Sector of our industrial area. He has also represented our company at the boards of directors of
several gas-fired energy companies and acted as assistant to the Presidência da Comercializadora
Brasileira de Energía Emergencial (Presidency of the Brazilian Supplier of Emergencial EnergyCBEE)
of the Ministry of Mines and Energy. Mr. Cerveró received a degree in Chemical Engineering from
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, and graduate education in Processing Engineering at
Petrobras. He also holds an MBA (Executive Management) from Fundação Getúlio Vargas FGV.
130
Executive Officers of PifCo
All of the current executive officers are experienced managers from Petrobras, some of whom
have served on the boards of directors of Petrobras subsidiaries and in representative offices
abroad. The executive officers work as a board and are responsible for PifCos day-to-day
management. PifCos executive officers serve indefinite terms and can be removed with or without
cause.
The following table sets forth certain information about PifCos executive officers.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF PifCo
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name |
|
Date of Birth |
|
Position |
|
Year of Appointment |
Daniel Lima de Oliveira |
|
December 29, 1951 |
|
Chairman |
|
2005 |
Guilherme Pontes Galvão França |
|
January 18, 1959 |
|
Commercial Manager |
|
2005 |
Sérvio Túlio da Rosa Tinoco |
|
June 21, 1955 |
|
Financial Manager |
|
2005 |
Mariângela Monteiro Tizatto |
|
August 9, 1960 |
|
Accounting Manager |
|
1998 |
Nilton Antônio de Almeida Maia |
|
June 21, 1957 |
|
Legal Manager |
|
2000 |
Gérson Luiz Gonçalves |
|
September 29, 1953 |
|
Auditor Manager |
|
2000 |
Ana Claudia Medeiros Borges |
|
December 27, 1967 |
|
Secretary |
|
2006 |
Daniel Lima de Oliveira Mr. Lima de Oliveira has been PifCos Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer and Petrobras Executive Manager of Corporate Finance since September 1, 2005.
For biographical information regarding Mr. Lima de Oliveira see Directors and Senior Management
of PetrobrasBoard of Directors of PifCo.
Guilherme Pontes Galvão França. Mr. França became an executive officer of PifCo on March 7,
2005. He has been General Manager of Petroleum and Industrial Products Supply and Trading since
October 1, 2005. He joined Petrobras in 1982 and worked as a Commercialization and Supply Analyst
in our logistics area from 1982 to 1990. In 1990 he moved to the trading area specializing in
Lubricants and fuel oil. From 1993 to 2000, Mr. França served as Manager of Special Products
Domestic Sales. From 2001 to 2004, he served as Manager of LPG Trading and Domestic Sales and
Manager of Clean Products Supply and Trading in 2005. Mr. França graduated in Chemical Engineering
from the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro in 1981.
Sérvio Túlio da Rosa Tinoco. Mr. Tinoco
became an executive officer of PifCo on September 1, 2005. Mr. Tinoco is the financial manager of
PifCo. He joined Petrobras in 1993 as an Economist in the Financial Department. Since 2000, he has
served as Manager of Corporate Financing Division. From 1996 to 1999 he served as Manager of Trade
Finance, Guarantees and Foreign Exchange Transactions. From 1995 to 1996 he served as Manager of
Credit and Collection. From 1999 to 2000, he served as a financial manager of Petrobras New York
office. Mr. Tinoco holds a Bachelors degree in Economics from Universidade Oswaldo Cruz, São
Paulo in 1978 and had a MBA from Fundação Getúlio Vargas, São Paulo in 1983 partially completed
with a one year in Institut Supérieur des Affaires ISA/HEC France.
Mariângela Monteiro Tizatto. Ms. Tizatto has served as PifCos Accounting Manager since April
4, 1998. She joined Petrobras in 1989 as an accountant in the Accounting Department. Since 1999,
she has served as Petrobras General Manager for Accounting Operations. From 1990 to 1995, she was
Manager of Petrobras Consolidated Accounting System, and from 1995 to 1999, she served as Manager
of Petrobras Division of Corporate Accounting. Before joining Petrobras, Ms. Tizatto was Manager
of Auditing for Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, where she worked for seven years. Ms. Tizatto has a
Bachelors degree in Accounting from the Cândido Mendes University and an Executive MBA from COPPEAD
Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. She was also a professor of Advanced Accounting at the
Moraes Junior University in Rio de Janeiro (1990). Ms. Tizatto was a Fiscal Council member of
Companhia Potiguar de Gás POTIGAS, during 2003 and 2004; Petrobras Gás S/A GASPETRO during
2005; and a Fiscal Counsel alternate for Fundação Petrobras de Seguridade Social PETROS
(Petrobras Pension Fund) during 2003 and 2004. She is a Fiscal Council member of Petrobras
Distribuidora S.A. BR and since 1995 she has been member of the Comissão de Auditoria e Normas
Contábeis da ABRASCA Associação Brasileira das Companhias Abertas.
Nilton Antônio de Almeida Maia. Mr. Maia has served as PifCos Legal Manager since April 19,
2000. He joined Petrobras in 1984 as an internal auditor. He has served as a tax consultant to
Petrobras Legal Department,
131
and since early 2000, has served as General Manager for the Finance and Tax Division. Mr. Maia
also currently serves as General Counsel for Petrobras. He has completed post-graduate degrees in
law, with specializations in energy and tax law, from the Universidade Cândido Mendes and the
Universidade Estácio de Sá.
Gerson Luiz Gonçalves. Mr. Gonçalves has served as PifCos Auditor Manager since April 19,
2000. He joined the Internal Audit Department of Petrobras in 1976 and has been Petrobras
Executive Manager for Internal Auditing for the last six years. He is responsible for all of
Petrobras internal accounting control activities. Mr. Gonçalves is a member of the Brazilian
Institute of Internal Auditors (AUDIBRA) and of the United States Institute of Internal Auditors
(IIA). He received a Bachelors degree in Accounting from Universidade de São Paulo USP in 1975.
Ana Claudia Medeiros Borges. Ms. Borges holds a Bachelors degree in Economics from
Universidade Gama Filho, Brazil and Postgraduate degree in Strategic Management from Candido Mendes
University. Ms. Borges has served as PifCos Secretary since March 2006. She joined us in 1998 as
Economist at Petrobras Internacional S.A. BRASPETRO. In 2000 she moved to our Financial
Department and joined the Platforms Financing Control Section, where she worked until 2002. Ms.
Borges served as Accounting Information Coordinator from 2002 to 2006. She has been PifCos
Businesses Coordinator since April 2006. Since March 2006 she has also been a member of the
Petrobras Química S.A. PETROQUISA Fiscal Council.
Compensation
Petrobras
For 2006, the aggregate amount of compensation we paid to all members of the board of
directors and executive officers was approximately U.S.$3 million.
In addition, the members of the board and the executive officers receive certain additional
benefits generally provided to our employees and their families, such as medical assistance,
payment of educational expenses and supplementary social security benefits.
We have no service contracts with our directors providing for benefits upon termination of
employment. We have a compensation and succession committee in the form of an advisory committee.
See Advisory CommitteesPetrobras.
PifCo
PifCos directors and executive officers are paid by Petrobras in respect of their function as
Petrobras employees, but they do not receive any additional compensation, pension or other
benefits from PifCo or Petrobras in respect of their functions as PifCos directors or officers, as
the case may be.
Share Ownership
Petrobras
As of May 31, 2007, the members of our board of directors, our executive officers, the members
of our Fiscal Council, and close members of their families, as a group, beneficially held a total
of 9,904 common shares and 27,792 preferred shares of our company. Accordingly, on an individual
basis, and as a group, our directors, executive officers, Fiscal Council members, and close members
of their families beneficially owned less than one percent of any class of our shares. The shares
held by our directors, executive officers, Fiscal Council members, and close members of their
families have the same voting rights as the shares of the same type and class that are held by our
other shareholders. None of our directors, executive officers, Fiscal Council members, or close
members of their families holds any options to purchase common shares or preferred shares.
Petrobras does not have a stock option plan for its directors, officers or employees.
132
PifCo
As of December 31, 2006, PifCos share capital was composed of 300,050,000 shares of common
stock. All of PifCos issued and outstanding shares of common stock are owned by us.
Fiscal Council
We have established a permanent Fiscal Council (conselho fiscal) in accordance with applicable
provisions of the Brazilian Corporate Law, composed of up to five members. As required by the
Brazilian Corporate Law our Fiscal Council is independent of our management and external auditors.
The Fiscal Councils responsibilities include, among others: (i) monitoring managements activities
and (ii) reviewing our annual report and financial statements. The members and their respective
alternates are elected by the shareholders at the annual general shareholders meeting. Holders of
preferred shares without voting rights and minority common shareholders are each entitled, as a
class, to elect one member and his respective alternate to the Fiscal Council. The Brazilian
government has the right to appoint the majority of the members of the Fiscal Council and their
alternates. One of these members and his respective alternate are appointed by the Minister of
Finance representing the Brazilian Treasury. The members of the Fiscal Council are elected at our
annual general shareholders meeting for a one-year term and reelection is permitted.
The following table lists the current members of the Fiscal Council:
FISCAL COUNCIL
|
|
|
|
|
Year of First |
Name |
|
Appointment |
Marcus Pereira Aucélio |
|
2005 |
Erenice Alves Guerra |
|
2006 |
Túlio Luiz Zamin |
|
2003 |
Nelson Rocha Augusto |
|
2003 |
Maria Lúcia de Oliveira Falcón |
|
2003 |
The following table lists the alternate members of the Fiscal Council:
|
|
|
|
|
Year of First |
Name |
|
Appointment |
Eduardo Coutinho Guerra |
|
2005 |
Marcelo Cruz |
|
2006 |
Edison Freitas de Oliveira |
|
2002 |
Maria Auxiliadora Alves da Silva |
|
2003 |
Celso Barreto Neto |
|
2002 |
Audit Committee Petrobras
We have an Audit Committee that advises our Board of Directors, composed exclusively of
members of our Board of Directors.
On June 17, 2005, our Board of Directors approved the appointment of our Audit Committee to
satisfy the audit committee requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and Rule 10A-3 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
The Audit Committee is responsible for, among other things: (1) making recommendations to our
Board of Directors with respect to the appointment, compensation and retention of our independent
auditor; (2) assisting in the resolution of conflicts between management and the independent
auditor with respect to our financial statements; and (3) establishing procedures for the receipt,
retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal control and auditing matters,
including procedures for the confidential, anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding
questionable accounting or auditing matters. On December 16, 2005, our Audit Committees
133
charter was amended to meet the audit committee requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
and Rule 10A-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including the incorporation of the powers
mentioned above.
The current members of our Audit Committee are Directors Fabio Colletti Barbosa, Francisco
Roberto de Albuquerque and Arthur Antonio Sendas. All our Audit Committee members are independent
as defined in 17 CRF 240.10A-3.
Other Advisory Committees
The bylaws of Petrobras also provide for the creation of a Comitê de Remuneração e Sucessão
(Compensation and Succession Committee), and a Comitê de Meio Ambiente (Environmental Committee).
PifCo
PifCo does not have any committees of its board of directors.
Employees and Labor Relations
Petrobras
We had 62,266 employees on December 31, 2006, compared to 53,904 employees on December 31,
2005 and 52,037 on December 31, 2004. The increase in the number of our employees in 2006 is
primarily a result of the implementation of a hiring policy designed to meet our demand for more
employees. This increased demand has resulted from the growth of our business and our desire to
reduce the number of outsourced personnel.
Of the 62,266 employees of Petrobras on December 31, 2006, the parent company employed 47,955.
Of these 47,955 employees, 32,265 occupied mid-level positions related to operations and
administrative support, and 14,809 worked as upper-level employees in engineering and
administration. The remaining 881 employees of the parent company were maritime employees. 69% of
the parent companys workforce was located in the Southeast region of Brazil, 25% was located in
the Northeast region, and the remaining 6% was elsewhere.
Expenses relating to employees of the parent company amounted to approximately R$4,776 million
(U.S.$2,234 million) in 2006, R$4,166 million (U.S.$1,711 million) in 2005 and R$3,546 million
(U.S.$1,212 million) in 2004. During 2006, these expenses represented 67% of our consolidated
employee expenses.
We negotiate annually collective bargaining agreements with the Oil Workers Unified
Federation, the union to which our onshore employees are affiliated, and the Maritime Employees
Union, the union to which our maritime employees are affiliated. On December 8, 2006, we executed
an amendment to the Collective Bargaining Agreement of 2005 for our onshore employees to amend
certain economic clauses of the agreement. These new economic clauses are retroactive to September
1, 2006, and are valid until August 31, 2007. The social clauses of the Agreement, negotiated in
2005, are also valid until August 31, 2007. The collective bargaining agreement with the maritime
employees union was signed on May 9, 2007. This agreement is retroactive to November 1, 2006, and
is valid until October 31, 2007.
Under the new terms of the collective bargaining agreement for our onshore employees, we
agreed to increase the salary of oil workers by 2.80%, which reflects an increase in inflation in
that period, as measured by the Índice do Custo de Vida (ICV DIEESE), or Cost of Living Index,
and we granted a single level pay scale raise to all employees. We also gave an extra payment to
all our employees in the amount of 80% of their monthly salary. We consider our relations with our
employees and with the Oil Workers Unified Federation and maritime employees union to be good and
respectable.
We have had no major labor strikes since 1995. We spent approximately R$328.7 million
(U.S.$151.1 million) on employee training in 2006 at our training centers, as compared to R$311.9
million (U.S.$128.1 million) in 2005.
With the enactment of the Oil Law and the emergence of competitors in the Brazilian oil
sector, we have developed a strategic plan to provide incentives to attract new employees and to
retain existing ones. As part of our
134
employee incentives, we have merit-based promotions and, as permitted by Brazilian law, a
profit sharing plan with predetermined criteria. Pursuant to this plan, the amount of the profit
sharing is determined by our Board of Directors and the manner of distribution is determined by
negotiation with the labor unions representing our employees. However, under Brazilian law, the
profit sharing plan will be subject to an annual limit equal to 25% of total proposed dividends for
the year.
Our profit sharing distributions to our employees within the entire Petrobras Group were
R$1,197 million (U.S$560 million) for 2006, R$1,006 million (U.S.$430 million) for 2005 and R$783
million (U.S.$295 million) for 2004. At our annual general shareholders meeting held on April 2,
2007, our shareholders approved a profit sharing distribution to Petrobras employees (excluding
subsidiaries) of R$993 million (U.S.$465 million) for 2006. Our subsidiaries approved a total
profit sharing distribution to their employees of R$204 million (U.S.$95 million) at their annual
general shareholders meetings in April of 2007.
Pension and Health Care Plans
We sponsor a contributory defined benefit pension plan known as PETROS, which covers
approximately 60.4% of our employees. The principal objective of PETROS has been to supplement the
social security pension benefits of our employees, as well as employees of our Brazilian
subsidiaries and affiliates, certain other companies and PETROS itself. Employees that participate
make mandatory monthly contributions. Our historical funding policy has been to make annual
contributions to the plan in the amount determined by actuarial appraisals. Contributions are
intended to provide not only for benefits attributed to service to date but also for those expected
to be earned in the future. We paid benefits of U.S.$713 million in 2006, as compared to U.S.$570
million in 2005. We made contributions totaling U.S.$187 million in 2006, as compared to U.S.$155
million in 2005. We recorded a liability of U.S.$4,843 million in 2006, U.S.$3,833 million in 2005
and U.S.$3,081 million in 2004 for the excess of the actuarial value of our obligation to provide
future benefits over the fair value of the plan assets used to satisfy that obligation. See Note 16
to our audited consolidated financial statements.
In addition, some of our consolidated subsidiaries, including PEPSA and Liquigás, have their
own defined benefit plans.
Because the PETROS plan is not admitting new participants since August 9, 2002, employees
hired since that date are covered by specific insurance policies, and will continue to be covered
by such policies until we are able to offer them a supplemental pension plan.
In 2003, we formed a task force with representatives of the National Union of Oil Workers
(FUP) and with PETROS, among others, in order to evaluate alternatives to a new model for the our
supplementary pension plan, including analyses of negotiated arrangements for the settlement of
actuarial deficits.
We have worked to develop proposals with the petroleum union and others representatives, in
order to evaluate alternatives for a new model for our supplementary pension plan. One of the
principal objectives was to define a solution to the technical deficit of the PETROS Plan and also
to solve problems of structural issues while always complying with the limits imposed by Brazilian
law.
On April 19, 2006, the Company, aiming to achieve an agreement regarding its Supplementary
Pension Plan, presented to employee participants and retirees a proposal to bring equilibrium to
the current PETROS Plan.
Execution of the proposal presented by the Companys Executive Board was subject to a number
of conditions, including the renegotiation of the PETROS Plan Regulations, in relation to the means
of readjusting the benefits and pensions, considering a significant rate of individual accession of
employees and dependants.
On February 28, 2007, the renegotiation target was met and the proposal submitted by the
Company became effective, and PETROS is calculating the amounts to be funded by the sponsors, that
will reduce the deficit of the PETROS Plan, as established by Brazilian pension law.
As the target was met, the proposal submitted by the Company became effective, which changed
two conditions of the plan: i) salary increases of active employees will no longer be passed on to
retired employees, who will be entitled to inflation indexation (IPCA); and ii) eventual decreases
in pensions provided by the governmental
135
plan will no longer be absorbed by PETROS. These changes will not materially affect the
projected benefit obligation.
In return for accepting the renegotiation, in March 2007, the participants, retired members
and pensioners received the aggregate financial incentive of U.S.$498.
Two main judicial proceedings have been taken by some pensioners against PETROS because of: i)
the lowering of the minimum age to receive benefits for employees who joined Petrobras in 1978/1979
and; ii) the lack of same coverage of governmental pension for widows. Petrobras is waiting for the
final settlement of those proceedings to determine whether the requests taken to court should be
included in the actuarial premises calculation and whether to consider alternatives to fund the
pension plan in case of loss.
On October 20, 2006, our Board of Directors approved the introduction of the PETROS 2 Plan for
employees who currently have no pension plan. The New Supplementary Pension Plan was formulated
according to the Variable Contribution Model. In this model, the contributions are capitalized in
the individuals account, and the pension benefits are established according to the account
balances. This plan also includes risk benefits with coverage for illness, incapacity and death,
and a lifetime income. The PETROS 2 Plan also includes a minimum benefit for payment of annuities,
which guarantees coverage of the benefit to ensure that it does not have a monetary value of under
30% of the average contribution salary. On December 20, 2006 the Department for Coordinating and
Controlling State Companies (DEST) decided to approve the proposed PETROS 2 Plan, which was also
approved on January 5, 2007 by the Ministry of Mines and Energy.
On January 19, 2007, the PETROS Board of Directors approved the PETROS 2 Plan, which will be
referred for assessment and statement by the Supplementary Pensions Office SPC, for the proper
final approval, whereupon it may be offered to the employees who are not presently covered by a
supplementary pension plan sponsored by the Company. According to SFAS No. 87 Employers
Accounting for Pensions (SFAS 87) the new plan is considered a defined-benefit pension plan and
the liability related to future benefits will be calculated on an annual basis by an independent
actuary and will be recorded as component of the sponsor companies liabilities.
We maintain a health care benefit plan (AMS), which offers defined benefits and covers all
employees (active and inactive) together with their dependents. We manage the plan, with the
employees contributing fixed amounts to cover principal risks and a portion of the costs relating
to other types of coverage in accordance with participation tables defined by certain parameters,
including salary levels.
Our commitment related to future benefits to plan participants is calculated on an annual
basis by an independent actuary, based on the Projected Unit Credit method. The health care plan is
not funded or otherwise collateralized by assets. Instead, we make benefit payments based on annual
costs incurred by plan participants.
Until 2006, the actuarial gains and losses, related to the health care benefit plan, generated
by the differences between the values of the obligation determined based on projections and the
actual figures, were respectively included or excluded when defining the net actuarial obligation.
As of December 31, 2006, according to SFAS 158 (See Note 16(d) to our financial statements),
the actuarial gains and losses generated by the differences between the values of the obligation
determined based on projections and the actual figures, are respectively included or excluded from
the calculation of the actuarial obligation and recorded as Post-retirement benefit reserves
adjustments net of tax- health care cost, as Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, in
shareholders equity. The gains and losses recorded as Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income are
amortized over the average remaining service period of the active employees.
Upon adoption of SFAS 158, as of December 31, 2006 the liabilities related to health care
increased by U.S.$1,495 and stockholders equity reduced by U.S.$987, net of income taxes.
On December 15, 2006, we implemented the Medical Benefit, which provides special terms on the
acquisition of certain medication by members of the AMS from participating drugstores, located
throughout Brazil. See Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and ProspectsCritical Accounting
Policies and EstimatesPension and Other Post-Retirement Benefits
136
PifCo
With the exception of twenty-five employees of Petrobras Europe Limited, or PEL, PifCos
personnel consist solely of our employees, and PifCo relies on us to provide all administrative
functions.
ITEM 7. MAJOR SHAREHOLDERS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Major Shareholders
Petrobras
Our capital stock is composed of common shares and preferred shares, all without par value. On
May 31, 2007, there were 2,536,673,672 outstanding common shares and
1,850,364,698 outstanding preferred shares.
On July 22, 2005, our shareholders approved a resolution to split each share of our capital
stock into four shares. As a result of the stock split, the ratio of our common and preferred
shares ADRs changed to four shares to one ADR. The stock split and change of ADR ratio became
effective on September 1, 2005.
Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, as amended, the number of non-voting shares of our company
may not exceed two-thirds of the total number of shares. The Brazilian government is required by
law to own at least a majority of our voting stock and currently owns 55.7% of our common shares,
which are our only voting shares. The Brazilian government does not have any special voting rights,
other than the right to always elect a majority of our directors, irrespective of the rights our
minority shareholders may have to elect directors, set forth in our by-laws.
The following table sets forth information concerning the ownership of our common shares and
preferred shares as of May 31, 2007 by the Brazilian government, certain public sector entities and
our officers and directors as a group. We are not aware of any other shareholder owning more than
5% of our common shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholder |
|
Common
Shares |
|
% |
|
Preferred
Shares |
|
% |
|
Total
Shares |
|
% |
Brazilian government |
|
|
1,413,258,228 |
|
|
|
55.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,413,258,228 |
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
BNDES Participações S.A.-BNDESPAR |
|
|
47,246,164 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
287,023,667 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
334,269,831 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
Other Brazilian public sector entities |
|
|
1,779,280 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
775,072 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
|
|
2,554,352 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
All directors and executive officers
as a Group (15 persons) |
|
|
9,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,792 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
1,074,380,096 |
|
|
|
42.3 |
|
|
|
1,562,538,167 |
|
|
|
84.5 |
|
|
|
2,636,918,263 |
|
|
|
60.1 |
|
Total |
|
|
2,536,673,672 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
1,850,364,698 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
4,387,038,370 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
As of May 31, 2007, approximately 37.2% of our preferred shares and approximately 27.6%
of our common shares were held of record in the United States directly or in the form of American
Depositary Shares. As of May 31, 2007, we had approximately 171,938,924 record holders of preferred
shares, or American Depositary Shares representing preferred shares, and approximately 175,050,997
record holders of common shares, or American Depositary Shares representing common shares, in the
United States. The ratio of our common and preferred share ADRs is four shares to one ADR. This
ratio was changed by the stock split effective September 1, 2005.
PifCo
As of December 31, 2006, PifCos capital stock was composed of 300,050,000 shares of common
stock. All of PifCos issued and outstanding shares are owned by us.
Petrobras Related Party Transactions
Board of Directors
Direct transactions with interested members of our board of directors or our executive
officers require the approval of our board of directors, and must follow the conditions of an
arms-length transaction and market
137
practices guiding transactions with third parties. None of the members of our board of
directors, our executive officers or close members of their families has had any direct interest in
any transaction we effected which is or was unusual in its nature or conditions or material to our
business during the current or the three immediately preceding financial years or during any
earlier financial year, which transaction remains in any way outstanding or unperformed. In
addition, we have not entered into any transaction with related parties which is or was unusual in
its nature or conditions during the current or the three immediately preceding financial years, nor
is any such transaction proposed, that is or would be material to our business.
We have no outstanding loans or guarantees to the members of our board of directors, our
executive officers or any close member of their families.
For a description of the shares beneficially held by the members of our board of directors and
close members of their families, see Item 6. Directors, Senior Management and EmployeesShare
Ownership.
Brazilian Government and PETROS
We engage in numerous transactions in the ordinary course of business with our controlling
shareholder, the Brazilian government, and with other companies controlled by it, including
financings from BNDES and banking, asset management and other transactions with Banco do Brasil
S.A. The above-mentioned transactions with Banco do Brasil had a net amount of U.S.$4,497 million
as of December 31, 2006. (See Note 24 to our audited consolidated financial statements.) As of
December 31, 2006, we had a receivable (the Petroleum and Alcohol Account) from the Brazilian
government, our controlling shareholder, of U.S.$368 million secured by a U.S.$53 million blocked
deposit account. See Item 4. Regulation of the Oil and Gas Industry in BrazilThe Petroleum and
Alcohol Account. (See Note 24 to our audited consolidated financial statements.)
We also have restricted deposits made by us, which serve as collateral for legal proceedings
involving the Brazilian government. As of December 31, 2006, these deposits amounted to U.S.$676
million. (See Note 24 to our audited consolidated financial statements.)
In addition, according to Brazilian law, we are only permitted to invest in securities issued
by the Brazilian Government in Brazil. This restriction does not apply to investment outside of
Brazil. As of December 31, 2006, the value of these government securities that has been directly
acquired and held by us amounted to U.S.$67 million. (See Note 24 to our audited consolidated
financial statements.)
We also have accounted for related party transactions with PETROS, basically composed of
government securities advanced by us to compose the plans assets. As of December 31, 2006, the
value of these securities amounted to U.S.$479 million. In addition, PETROS also makes direct
investments in government securities. (See Note 24 to our audited consolidated financial
statements.)
For additional information regarding our principal transactions with related parties, see Note
24 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
PifCo Related Party Transactions
As a result of being our wholly-owned subsidiary, PifCo has numerous transactions with us and
other affiliated companies in the ordinary course of business. PifCos primary business is to serve
as an intermediary between third-party oil suppliers and us by engaging in crude oil and oil
product purchases from international suppliers and reselling crude oil and oil products in U.S.
dollars to us on a deferred payment basis, at a price which represents a premium to compensate
PifCo for its financing costs. Substantially all of PifCos revenues are generated by transactions
with us.
Since PifCos inception there have been no, and there are no proposed, material transactions
with any of PifCos officers and directors. PifCo does not extend any loans to its officers and
directors.
138
PifCos transactions with related parties resulted in the following balances in 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006 |
|
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
10,658.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,681.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable(1) |
|
|
6,114.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,329.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable Securities |
|
|
627.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exports Prepayment |
|
|
67.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other non current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
1,151.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,165.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
239.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exports prepayment |
|
|
464.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts Payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,142.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
950.7 |
|
Notes payable(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,386.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,346.1 |
|
Unearned income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
248.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
176.5 |
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,441.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,734.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
19,325.9 |
|
|
|
14,220.1 |
|
|
|
15,701.5 |
|
|
|
9,207.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
17,470.2 |
|
|
|
6,778.4 |
|
|
|
12,426.4 |
|
|
|
5,473.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
1,855.7 |
|
|
|
7,441.7 |
|
|
|
3,275.1 |
|
|
|
3,734.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
PifCos notes receivable from and payable to us for the majority of the loans bear interest
at LIBOR plus 3.0% per year. |
139
PifCos principal transactions with related parties are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars) |
|
|
|
Income |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Expense |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Expense |
|
Sales of crude oil and oil
products and services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PETROBRAS |
|
|
9,729.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,025.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,374.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
REFAP S.A. |
|
|
1,484.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,405.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
972.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Petrobras America, Inc.PAI |
|
|
2,967.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,487.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,734.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
BR Distribuidora |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
EG3 S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
PESA |
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Petrobras Bolívia |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petrobras Paraguay
Distribución |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PETROBRAS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,044.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,931.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,236.7 |
) |
Petrobras America, Inc.PAI |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(227.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(459.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(375.3 |
) |
Braspetro Oil Services
CompanyBRASOIL |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74.7 |
) |
Companhia MEGA S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(505.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(367.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(299.4 |
) |
Eg3 S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60.4 |
) |
PESA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(257.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(187.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(72.1 |
) |
PIB B.V |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(152.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158.3 |
) |
PEBIS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(226.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(164.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(110.3 |
) |
REFAP |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(206.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.1 |
) |
Ecuadortlc S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(252.6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(211.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petrobras Colombia |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(271.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(196.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and
administrative expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PETROBRAS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(176.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(158.0 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97.0 |
) |
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1.7 |
) |
Financial income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PETROBRAS |
|
|
623.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
580.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
466.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
REFAP S.A. |
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Braspetro Oil
CompanyBOC |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Braspetro Oil Services
CompanyBRASOIL |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
PIB B.V |
|
|
161.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
PNBV |
|
|
118.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
AGRI BV |
|
|
56.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PETROBRAS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(722.4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(409.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(168.4 |
) |
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
Other Income and Expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PNBV |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
15,235.7 |
|
|
|
(9,034.1 |
) |
|
|
14,739.9 |
|
|
|
(8,348.2 |
) |
|
|
10,687.0 |
|
|
|
(4,659.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 8. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Petrobras Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
See Item 18. Financial Statements and Index to Financial Statements.
PifCo Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information
See Item 18. Financial Statements and Index to Financial Statements.
140
Legal Proceedings
Petrobras
We are currently subject to numerous proceedings relating to civil, criminal, administrative,
environmental, labor and tax claims. Several individual disputes account for a significant part of
the total amount of claims against us. Our audited consolidated financial statements only include
provisions for probable and reasonably estimable losses and expenses we may incur in connection
with pending litigation, including the proceedings described below under Environmental Claims.
See Note 19 to our audited consolidated financial statements. The table below sets forth our
recorded financial provisions by type of claim: PROVISIONS BY TYPE OF CLAIM(1).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars) |
|
Labor claims |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Tax claims |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Civil claims |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
Commercial claims and other contingencies |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Excludes provisions for contractual contingencies and tax assessments by the INSS. |
Claims against Petrobras, the parent company, as of December 31, 2006, corresponded to
approximately 49.0% of the total amount of claims against us and the amounts paid by us in respect
of legal claims against Petrobras in the last five years averaged U.S.$68 million per year. As of
December 31, 2006, we estimated that the total amount of claims against us, excluding disputes
involving non-monetary claims or claims not easily evaluated in the current stage of the
proceedings, was approximately U.S.$13.5 billion.
The most significant claims are described below:
Civil claims
On November 23, 1992, Porto Seguro Imóveis Ltda., a minority shareholder of Petroquisa, filed
a lawsuit against us for alleged losses suffered as a result of the sale of the share participation
held by Petroquisa in various petrochemical companies included in the National Privatization
Program (Programa Nacional de Desestatização). The plaintiff in the lawsuit requests that we, as
controlling shareholder of Petroquisa, be compelled to reinstate the damages made to Petroquisas
equity, as a consequence of the corporate acts that approved the minimum sales price attributed to
its share participation in the capital of the privatized companies. An initial decision on January
14, 1997 held us liable to Petroquisa for damages in an amount equivalent to U.S.$3,406 million. In
addition, we were required to pay the plaintiff 5% of the indemnification amount as a premium as
well as lawyers fees of 20% over that amount. However, since the amount due is payable to
Petroquisa, not the plaintiff, and we own 100.0% of Petroquisas share capital, the actual
disbursement, in the case that the decision is not dismissed, will be limited to 25% of the damages
amount, or U.S.$851 million. We appealed and prevailed in canceling the judgment, but a subsequent
appellate decision on March 30, 2004 found us liable for U.S.$2,359 million, plus a 5% premium and
20% of attorneys fees, the latter in favor of Porto Seguro. Further, we filed appeals to both the
Superior Justice Tribunal and to the Federal Supreme Court, and we are waiting for a final decision
on these appeals.
On May 28, 1981, Kallium Mineração S.A. brought an action against Companhia de Pesquisa de
Recursos Minerais CPRM seeking an indemnification of approximately U.S.$450 million for the early
termination of a contract for the exploration of a potassium salt mine in Sergipe. The Brazilian
Government, which had previously granted CPRM the right to develop a exploration project for the
potassium salt mine, cancelled the concession to
CPRM and transferred it to our former subsidiary, Petromisa. CPRM, on its turn, terminated its
contract for the exploration of the mine with Kallium Mineração S.A. As a result, CPRM brought us
and the Brazilian Government into the proceedings as co-defendants. On August 10, 1999, the court
denied most of Kalliums claims, but required us to indemnify all expenses incurred by Kallium for
research conducted in connection with the exploration of the mine, which correspond to
approximately U.S.$1 million. In September 1999, Kallium and we appealed the decision
141
and both
appeals were denied. We have filed additional appeals and are awaiting a judgment. The total
damages amount that may be payable will be subject to monetary adjustment and to interest at 6%
calculated as of the date of the filing of the lawsuit.
Several individuals have filed a collective lawsuit (an ação popular) against us, Repsol-YPF
and the Brazilian government seeking to unwind the 2001 exchange of certain of our operating assets
in Brazil for some of YPFs operating assets in Argentina. The plaintiffs maintain that the assets
exchanged were not properly valued and that, therefore, the transaction was not in our best
interests. On September 5, 2002, the court granted an injunction to the plaintiffs. The Superior
Court of Justice of Brazil suspended the injunction, stressing that the transaction had been
approved by the Brazilian antitrust authorities, the ANP and the Brazilian Federal Audit Court. On
May 15, 2005, the lawsuit was judged on the merits in our favor and the other parties appealed. We
are awaiting a final disposition on the merits.
On March 9, 2006, Barracuda Caratinga Leasing Company B.V. (BCLC), the special purpose company
that currently owns the assets of the project, represented by Petrobras (as Construction and
Operations Manager), commenced an arbitration against KBR pursuant to the provisions of the EPC
Contract as amended between BCLC and KBR. BCLC is seeking damages in the amount of approximately
U.S.$220 million plus interest for the costs of monitoring and replacing defective stud bolts, plus
the costs and expenses of the arbitration. On March 17, 2006, KBR responded with its
counter-notice seeking dismissal of BCLCs claim and approximately U.S.$22 million in damages for
replacement costs of stud bolts that were replaced by KBR. The arbitration panel has been formed
and the arbitration is currently in the submissions phase.
On January 18, 2000, a pipeline connecting one of our terminals to a refinery in Guanabara Bay
ruptured, causing a release of approximately 341,000 gallons of crude oil into the bay. We
undertook action to control the spill in an effort to prevent the oil from threatening additional
areas. As a result of this spill, several individual damage lawsuits were filed by fishermen of the
State of Rio de Janeiro. The lawsuits currently in course correspond to an aggregate amount of
approximately R$52 million. In addition, the Federation of Fishermen of the State of Rio de Janeiro
filed a lawsuit against us claiming damages of approximately R$537 million. On February 7, 2002,
the judge hearing this matter found that damages were due, but not in the amount claimed. Both
parties appealed this decision. On October 8, 2002, the Court of Appeals of the State of Rio de
Janeiro denied the appeal filed by the plaintiff and dismissed the claim with respect to all
fishermen who had already settled their claims against us or who had already filed individual
lawsuits against us, and also with respect to certain other fishermen. These dismissals
dramatically reduced the number of plaintiffs who could be entitled to damages. Further appeals
(agravos de instrumento) by both sides presented on June 26, 2003, to the STJ and the STF,
respectively, were denied. On February 2, 2007, the judge who heard the case in the first instance
published a decision accepting in part the court expert report that defined the period in which
Guanabara Bays fish would be affected by the spill. This decision, which overturned the appellate
courts decision, established the parameters for calculating the indemnity due, given that the
decision was based upon the same value for each fisherman affected, which represent R$1,102 million
through December 2005 (without interests and monetary indexation after that date). We will appeal
this decision
In November 2005, two employees from Finarge Armamento Genoveses S.r.I., an Italian company
that renders transportation services to our Company, filed a lawsuit against us in the Genova
courts, requesting indemnification for rescuing an adrift platform. This lawsuit is based on
Sections 2, 3 and 10 of the Brussels Convention, which provide that those who assist adrift vessels
are entitled to an indemnification. The amount of the indemnification will be established by the
Italian judge, but it shall not exceed the value of the transported platform. The plaintiffs
estimated the value of the platform at U.S.$130 million. We have not yet presented an answer and,
according to our insurance policy for this platform, we believe the value of the platform does not
exceed U.S.$20 million.
Labor Claims
We are a defendant in five labor lawsuits filed by oil workers unions with labor courts in Rio
de Janeiro, Sergipe and São Paulo related to our alleged failure to index salaries in accordance
with the official inflation rates published by the Brazilian government in 1989. In Rio de Janeiro
and Sergipe, we lost two lawsuits and the decisions are currently being enforced. We appealed one
of such lawsuits and the decision is currently under examination by the court. The allegations in
Rio de Janeiro and Sergipe refer to the months of February and August
142
of 1989. In Rio de Janeiro
(relating to a suit in Macaé), we were successful in definitively revoking one decision, while in
São Paulo we are awaiting the judgment of one appeal before the Federal Supreme Court.
Tax Claims
We received several tax assessments from the INSS alleging irregular presentation of
documentation by construction companies and other service providers under contract with us with
regard to their INSS contributions. The INSS seeks to hold us jointly and severally liable for
contributions not made by these providers, as set forth by applicable law. We are analyzing each of
the INSS assessments in order to attempt to recover payments that we made to the INSS with respect
to these tax assessments. In addition, we intend to take action against service providers in order
to recover any amounts paid and not recovered from the INSS, based on our right to contribution.
Because it is unlikely that we will successfully obtain a reversal of the INSS decision through
the agencys administrative procedures, at December 31, 2006, we had a balance of U.S.$25 million
in our provision to cover future payments to the INSS.
Federal tax authorities (Delegacia da Receita Federal) have served us with a tax assessment of
approximately R$566 million related to a withholding tax (IRRF) that they believe should have been
paid in connection with remittances we made abroad between 1998 and 2002. On December 31, 2006,
this amount corresponded to approximately R$666 million (approximately U.S.$311 million). The
remittances were related to the purchase of imported oil by us. According to the federal tax
authorities, such remittances corresponded to interest payments, which they believe would give rise
to the tax levy they claim. However, the importation documents do not make reference to the alleged
interest payments. In May 2006, we were notified that the Delegacia da Receita Federal denied the
tax assessment. An appeal (recurso de ofício) to a higher administrative body (conselho de
contribuintes) is pending that seeks to modify the decision favorable to us.
The Brazilian Revenue Service has filed two tax assessments against us in connection with the
withholding tax, or IRRF on foreign remittances of payments related to the charter of vessels of
movable platforms. On February 17, 2003, the Brazilian Revenue Service served us with a tax
assessment notice for R$93 million (approximately U.S.$32 million) covering disputed taxes for
1998. On December 31, 2006, this amount corresponded to approximately R$117 million (approximately
U.S.$55 million). On June 27, 2003, the Brazilian Revenue Service served us with a tax assessment
notice for R$3,064 million (approximately U.S.$1,066 million) covering disputed taxes for the
period from 1999 to 2002. On December 31, 2006, this amount corresponded to R$3,914 million
(approximately U.S.$1,832 million). We appealed the two unfavorable rulings from the Brazilian
Revenue Service with respect to these tax assessments to a higher administrative court. The
administrative court denied both of our appeals, upholding the tax assessments imposed by the
Federal Revenue Office in Rio de Janeiro and declaring that the tax in question is not applicable
to us. We still have two pending appeals to the highest administrative level (câmara superior de
recursos fiscais). If necessary, we will bring suit at the federal judicial level.
Certain independent fuel distributors located throughout Brazil have brought claims against
us. Collectively, these claims total approximately R$821.48 million (U.S.$394 million) and aim at
the restitution of the Sales Taxes (ICMS) retained from such distributors and collected by us in
favor of many states, plus damages. We believe these taxes were properly collected and represent
valid state tax credits. However, in connection with these claims, approximately R$76 million
(U.S.$32 million) in injunctive relief was declared against us in various local courts and seized
from our accounts in several jurisdictions in anticipation of favorable judgments for the
distributors. Upon appeal, these rulings were subsequently overruled.
We have sold imported naphtha, to a company named Braskem, provided that the naphtha would be
applied in the production of petrochemical raw materials, instead of the production of gasoline or
diesel. On December 12, 2006, the Brazilian Revenue Service filed a tax assessment (auto de
infração) against us, in the
amount of R$1,288 million (U.S.$600 million) (including interest and penalties), in connection
with CIDE (Contribuição de Intervenção no Domínio Econômico or Contribution for Intervention in the
Economic Sector, an excise tax applied to the sale and import of crude oil, oil products and
natural gas products), on the importation of naphtha, on the grounds that we did not prove that the
naphtha was not used to produce gasoline or diesel. As we have issued the relevant invoices that
contain a clarification that the naphtha will not be applied to the production of gasoline or
diesel, and considering that Braskem has confirmed that the naphtha was used solely in
143
petrochemical activities, as agreed in our contract, we believe these imports are not taxable. We
asked for a review of the assessment and will continue to appeal at the federal administrative
level and later at the federal judicial level, if necessary.
Environmental Claims
In the period between 2001 to 2006, we experienced several accidents, some of which led to
significant oil spills: 77,402 gallons in 2006, 71,141 gallons in 2005, 140,000 gallons in 2004,
73,000 gallons in 2003 and 52,000 gallons in 2002. In connection with these accidents, several
administrative, civil and criminal investigations and proceedings have not yet been concluded, the
most significant of which are specified below. We cannot predict whether additional litigation will
result from those accidents or whether any such additional proceedings would have a material
adverse effect on us. See Note 19(d) to our audited consolidated financial statements.
January 2000 spillGuanabara Bay
On January 18, 2000, a pipeline connecting one of our terminals to a refinery in Guanabara Bay
ruptured, causing a release of approximately 341,000 gallons of fuel into the bay. We undertook
action to control the spill in an effort to prevent the oil from threatening additional areas. We
have spent approximately R$104 million in connection with the clean-up efforts and fines imposed by
IBAMA in connection with this spill, and are subject to several legal proceedings that remain
pending as a result of this spill, including a criminal proceeding instituted on January 24, 2001
by the Public Ministry of the State of Rio de Janeiro. The ruling declared the proceeding invalid
by virtue of the Federal Constitution of Brazil, which permits only individuals, not legal
entities, to be held criminally liable. This ruling is not subject to appeal. In addition, on April
30, 2002, a decision from the court determined the conclusion of the criminal proceeding. Although
this decision is favorable to us and is not subject to appeal by the plaintiff, we nevertheless
appealed to the Brazilian Court of Justice (Superior Tribunal de Justiça, or STJ) to seek an
additional ruling in our favor based on constitutional grounds, in order to set a favorable
precedent.
July 2000 SpillCuritiba
On July 16, 2000, an oil spill occurred at our President Getúlio Vargas refinery, located
approximately 15 miles (24 kilometers) from Curitiba, capital of the State of Paraná, releasing
approximately 1.06 million gallons of crude oil into the surrounding area. We spent approximately
R$74 million on the clean-up effort and fines imposed by the State of Paraná authorities. In
addition, in relation to this spill:
|
|
|
on August 1, 2000, IBAMA imposed fines in the amount of R$168 million. We contested
these fines, but IBAMA subsequently upheld them. On February 3, 2003, we filed a
lawsuit in order to challenge these fines and obtained an injunction that allows us to
pursue a decision to this claim without posting a bond in the amount of the fines. The
judge decided in favor of the joinder of this proceeding with other civil petitions,
and we asked to the Regional Federal Court of Appeals (TRF) to reverse this decision.
We are currently awaiting a final disposition of this case; |
|
|
|
|
several civil actions have been filed against us, the most important of which is a
civil action filed on January 1, 2001 by the Federal Public Ministry and the Paraná
State Public Ministry seeking damages of approximately R$2,300 million. On April 4,
2001, we filed our response and are still awaiting a decision. At present, the
proceedings have been suspended, while awaiting the results of the technical survey;
and |
|
|
|
|
the Federal Public Ministry instituted a criminal action against us, our former
president and our former superintendent of the REPAR refinery. A habeas corpus petition
has currently suspended the action in favor of us, our former president and the former
superintendent of the REPAR refinery. In addition, with respect to our former president
and REPAR refinerys former superintendent, the STF and STJ
have each concluded their criminal proceedings. The habeas corpus petition was judged
by the STJ on September 2, 2006, and the court granted habeas corpus to Luiz Eduardo
Valente Moreira, the former superintendent of REPAR. In the same decision, the STJ
suspended the penal action against us and our former President (Henri Philippe
Reichstul). |
144
February 2001 spillRivers in the State of Paraná
On February 16, 2001, our Araucária-Paranaguá pipeline ruptured as a result of an unusual
movement of the soil and spilled approximately 15,059 gallons of fuel oil into several rivers
located in the State of Paraná. On February 20, 2001, we finalized the cleaning of the river
surfaces, recovering approximately 13,738 gallons of fuel oil. As a result of the accident:
|
|
|
the Instituto Ambiental do Paraná, or IAP fined us approximately R$150 million. We
contested this fine, and IAP reduced the fine to R$90 million. We contested the reduced
fine, but the legal proceeding was suspended by decision of the court; |
|
|
|
|
the Federal Public Ministry and the Paraná State Public Ministry filed a public
civil action against us seeking damages of approximately R$3.7 billion and to oblige us
to take certain remedial steps to prevent future accidents. On July 19, 2002, we filed
our response, but the legal proceeding was suspended by decision of the court; |
|
|
|
|
in the civil action presented by the Federal Public Ministry, the judge determined
that the action must be sent to the State Court, which has authority over this case.
The Federal Public Ministry appealed to the Federal Regional Court. The proceeding has
been handled by the attorney for the Federal Public Ministry since October 21, 2005.
Although the Federal Regional Court has not yet decided if the authority to make a
determination belongs to the Federal Court or to the State Court, the State Court of
Morretes judge has decided to suspend the lawsuit; |
|
|
|
|
the Instituto Ambiental do Paraná (IAP) presented a civil action requiring the
recovery of the damages and the indemnity of those for whom damages could not be
recovered, in the value of R$150 million. On October 5, 2006, the judge decided to
suspend the lawsuit and the upcoming hearing, in which the terms of the planned survey
were to be discussed. That hearing will instead be held after the judgment by the
Federal Regional Court as to the proper jurisdiction of the Federal and State Courts;
and |
|
|
|
|
the Federal Police office in the State of Paraná conducted a criminal
investigation, which has been concluded. |
March 2001 gas explosion and spillRoncador field
On March 15, 2001, a gas explosion inside one of the columns of the P-36 production platform,
located in the Roncador field (75 miles off the Brazilian coast) led to the death of 11 employees
and eventual sinking of the platform. The accident also caused 396,300 gallons of oil to spill into
the ocean. As a result of the accident:
|
|
|
the Federal Public Ministry filed a lawsuit on January 23, 2002 seeking the payment
of R$100 million as environmental damages, among other demands. We have presented our
defense to these claims and are awaiting a decision; and |
|
|
|
|
IBAMA fined us approximately R$7 million. We are contesting these fines through
administrative proceedings. One of these proceedings has ended and the fine (in the
amount of R$2 million) has been upheld by IBAMA. We shall, in the near future, file a
lawsuit seeking the cancellation of this fine. |
October 2002 FPSO accident
On October 13, 2002, a power blackout in FPSO P-34, which is located in the
Barracuda-Caratinga fields, affected the ships water balance system and caused water to move from
storage tanks located in one side of the ship to the tanks located in the opposite side, causing
the FPSO to roll up to an angle of 40 degrees. Four days later, the stability of the ship had been
restored, without casualties or spill of oil into the sea. As a result of the investigation of
this accident, several measures to prevent similar accidents were incorporated into our
Programa de Excelência Operacional, or PEO (Operational Excellence Program). In connection with the
accident:
|
|
|
we executed a Termo de Ajustamento de Conduta (Agreement for Regularization of
Conduct), or TAC, with IBAMA, relating to our production activities in the Campos
Basin, pursuant to a Presidential |
145
|
|
|
Decree enacted on December 12, 2002. Under the TAC,
we agreed to conduct certain actions in the Campos Basin to reduce the risk of
environmental damage; |
|
|
|
|
following the FPSO P-34 accident, the Comissão Estadual de Controle Ambiental (State
Commission for Environment Control, or CECA) fined us in R$1 million because our
exploration license in Campos Basin had allegedly expired. We are contesting this fine
through administrative proceedings; and |
|
|
|
|
on January 16, 2003, the Federal Public Ministry filed a motion for a protective
order with a request for an injunction against us, IBAMA and Agência Nacional do
Petróleo (National Petroleum Agency, or ANP), in order to challenge the validity of the
letter of intent and of the TAC and prevent us from obtaining from IBAMA new licenses
for our platforms located in the Campos Basin. The trial judge partially accepted the
plaintiffs request for an injunction. The court suspended the injunction, upholding
the validity of the TAC, which is not subject to appeal. The proceedings at the trial
court will continue until the trial judge makes a final decision on the merits of the
complaint, a decision that would be subject to further appeals. |
Campos Basin Drilling Operations
On February 3, 2006 IBAMA imposed a fine on us in the amount of R$213.2 million for the
performance of some drilling operations in the Campos basin in alleged breach of the agreement
(termo de ajustamento de conduta) executed between Petrobras and IBAMA on August 11, 2004. On
February 16, 2006, we contested the fine through an administrative proceeding with IBAMA, but no
decision has been issued yet. We believe the drilling performed by us along the Brazilian coast,
including the drilling performed on the Campos Basin, is legitimate based on IBAMAs Previous
Drilling License, Federal Government Decree of December 9, 2002, and the agreement (termo de
ajustamento de conduta) executed between Petrobras and IBAMA, which has been modified and is valid
through June 30, 2007.
Pollution
On January 15, 1986, the Public Ministry of the State of São Paulo and the União dos
Defensores da Terra (Union for Defense of the Earth), filed a public civil action against us and 23
other companies in the State Court of São Paulo for alleged damages caused by pollution. This
lawsuit is entering the discovery phase. Although the plaintiffs alleged damages of U.S.$89,500 in
an initial pleading filed with the Court, the Public Ministry of the State of São Paulo has
publicly stated that U.S.$800 million ultimately will be required to remedy the alleged
environmental damage. The Court refused to assert joint and several liability of the defendants,
and we believe that it will be difficult to determine the environmental damage attributable to each
defendant.
PifCo
There is no litigation or governmental proceeding pending or, to PifCos knowledge, threatened
against PifCos or any of its subsidiaries that, if adversely determined, would have a significant
effect on its financial position or profitability.
146
Dividend Distribution
Petrobras
The tables below describe our dividend payments for the last five fiscal years, including
amounts paid in the form of interest on shareholders equity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2003 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions of U.S. dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid to shareholders |
|
|
3,144 |
|
|
|
2,104 |
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
941 |
|
|
|
999 |
|
Dividends paid to minority interests |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,213 |
|
|
|
2,110 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
1,018 |
|
For Brazilian Corporate Laws on minimum dividend distribution requirements, see Item 10.
Additional InformationMemorandum and Articles of Incorporation of PetrobrasPayment of Dividends
and Interest on Shareholders Equity and Item 10. Additional InformationMemorandum and Articles
of Incorporation of PetrobrasMandatory Distribution. We may change our dividend policy at any
time within the limits set forth by Brazilian law.
PifCo
For a description of PifCos dividend distribution policy, see Items 111 through 118Amended
and Restated Memorandum and Articles of Association of PifCoDividends.
ITEM 9. THE OFFER AND LISTING
Petrobras
Trading Markets
Our shares and ADSs are listed or quoted on the following markets:
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
São Paulo Stock Exchange (BOVESPA) São Paulo (ticker symbol
PETR3); Mercado de Valores Latinoamericanos en Euros
(LATIBEX) Madrid, Spain (ticker symbol XPBR) |
|
|
|
Preferred Shares
|
|
São Paulo Stock Exchange (BOVESPA) São Paulo (ticker symbol
PETR4); Mercado de Valores Latinoamericanos en Euros
(LATIBEX) Madrid, Spain (ticker symbol XPBRA) |
|
|
|
Common ADSs
|
|
New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) New York (ticker symbol PBR) |
|
|
|
Preferred ADSs
|
|
New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) New York (ticker symbol PBRA) |
|
|
|
Common Shares
|
|
Bolsa de Comercio de Buenos Aires (BCBA) Buenos Aires,
Argentina (ticker symbol APBR) |
|
|
|
Preferred Shares
|
|
Bolsa de Comercio de Buenos Aires (BCBA) Buenos Aires, Argentina (ticker symbol APBRA) |
Our common and preferred shares are traded on the São Paulo Stock Exchange since 1968. Our
ADSs representing four common shares and our ADSs representing four preferred shares have been
traded on the New York Stock Exchange since 2000 and 2001, respectively. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
serves as the depositary for both the common and preferred ADSs. Our common and preferred shares
have been traded on the LATIBEX since 2002. The LATIBEX is an electronic market created in 1999 by
the Madrid Stock Exchange in order to enable trading of Latin American equity securities in euro
denominations.
Our common and preferred shares have been traded on the Bolsa de Comercio de Buenos Aires
(Buenos Aires Stock Exchange) since April 27, 2006.
147
Price Information
São Paulo Stock Exchange
The tables below set forth reported high and low closing sale prices in reais per common and
preferred share and the reported average daily trading volume in common and preferred shares on the
São Paulo Stock Exchange for the periods indicated. The table also sets forth prices in U.S.
dollars per common and preferred share at the selling market rate for the purchase of U.S. dollars,
as reported by the Central Bank of Brazil, for each of the dates of such quotations. See Item 3.
Key InformationExchange Rates for information with respect to exchange rates applicable during
the periods set forth below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMON SHARES TRADED ON BOVESPA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars |
|
Average Number of |
|
|
reais per Common Share |
|
per Common Share |
|
Common Shares |
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Traded per Day |
2002 |
|
|
15.78 |
|
|
|
9.47 |
|
|
|
6.73 |
|
|
|
2.45 |
|
|
|
1,630,562 |
|
2003 |
|
|
21.13 |
|
|
|
11.50 |
|
|
|
7.26 |
|
|
|
3.22 |
|
|
|
1,290,235 |
|
2004 |
|
|
26.93 |
|
|
|
19.14 |
|
|
|
10.09 |
|
|
|
5.99 |
|
|
|
1,330,191 |
|
2005 |
|
|
41.80 |
|
|
|
25.40 |
|
|
|
18.37 |
|
|
|
9.39 |
|
|
|
973,131 |
|
2006 |
|
|
55.40 |
|
|
|
40.65 |
|
|
|
26.85 |
|
|
|
17.69 |
|
|
|
1,127,049 |
|
|
2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
33.08 |
|
|
|
25.40 |
|
|
|
12.40 |
|
|
|
9.39 |
|
|
|
1,224,093 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
31.50 |
|
|
|
26.08 |
|
|
|
13.21 |
|
|
|
10.16 |
|
|
|
894,337 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
41.80 |
|
|
|
29.58 |
|
|
|
18.33 |
|
|
|
12.49 |
|
|
|
996,648 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
41.30 |
|
|
|
33.31 |
|
|
|
18.37 |
|
|
|
14.82 |
|
|
|
782,600 |
|
2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
51.69 |
|
|
|
42.30 |
|
|
|
23.34 |
|
|
|
18.09 |
|
|
|
1,092,195 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
55.40 |
|
|
|
40.65 |
|
|
|
26.85 |
|
|
|
17.69 |
|
|
|
1,212,664 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
51.79 |
|
|
|
42.15 |
|
|
|
23.74 |
|
|
|
19.09 |
|
|
|
973,913 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
54.49 |
|
|
|
42.69 |
|
|
|
25.51 |
|
|
|
19.72 |
|
|
|
1,241,273 |
|
2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
55.75 |
|
|
|
44.85 |
|
|
|
26.16 |
|
|
|
21.02 |
|
|
|
1,576,872 |
|
2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November |
|
|
51.00 |
|
|
|
46.75 |
|
|
|
23.56 |
|
|
|
21.82 |
|
|
|
1,200,516 |
|
December |
|
|
54.49 |
|
|
|
50.50 |
|
|
|
25.51 |
|
|
|
23.31 |
|
|
|
1,103,042 |
|
2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January |
|
|
55.75 |
|
|
|
48.25 |
|
|
|
26.16 |
|
|
|
22.60 |
|
|
|
1,705,886 |
|
February |
|
|
52.45 |
|
|
|
47.85 |
|
|
|
24.91 |
|
|
|
22.58 |
|
|
|
1,622,411 |
|
March |
|
|
51.74 |
|
|
|
44.85 |
|
|
|
25.14 |
|
|
|
21.02 |
|
|
|
1,416,464 |
|
April |
|
|
54.49 |
|
|
|
50.75 |
|
|
|
26.80 |
|
|
|
24.89 |
|
|
|
1,154,640 |
|
May |
|
|
53.40 |
|
|
|
50.30 |
|
|
|
27.45 |
|
|
|
24.91 |
|
|
|
1,312,968 |
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PREFERRED SHARES TRADED ON BOVESPA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars |
|
Average Number of |
|
|
reais per Preferred Share |
|
per Preferred Share |
|
Preferred Shares |
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Traded per Day |
2002 |
|
|
15.08 |
|
|
|
8.79 |
|
|
|
6.43 |
|
|
|
2.27 |
|
|
|
4,269,481 |
|
2003 |
|
|
19.37 |
|
|
|
10.40 |
|
|
|
6.67 |
|
|
|
2.90 |
|
|
|
4,584,203 |
|
2004 |
|
|
24.47 |
|
|
|
16.80 |
|
|
|
9.17 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
|
|
|
4,825,476 |
|
2005 |
|
|
37.21 |
|
|
|
22.74 |
|
|
|
16.50 |
|
|
|
8.37 |
|
|
|
4,578,877 |
|
2006 |
|
|
49.80 |
|
|
|
36.50 |
|
|
|
23.33 |
|
|
|
15.89 |
|
|
|
6,559,601 |
|
2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
28.94 |
|
|
|
22.74 |
|
|
|
10.86 |
|
|
|
8.37 |
|
|
|
4,957,720 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
27.70 |
|
|
|
22.98 |
|
|
|
11.62 |
|
|
|
8.87 |
|
|
|
3,952,243 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
37.01 |
|
|
|
26.03 |
|
|
|
16.25 |
|
|
|
10.84 |
|
|
|
4,638,194 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
37.21 |
|
|
|
29.46 |
|
|
|
16.50 |
|
|
|
13.11 |
|
|
|
4,790,216 |
|
2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
47.00 |
|
|
|
38.09 |
|
|
|
21.50 |
|
|
|
16.29 |
|
|
|
6,257,082 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
48.15 |
|
|
|
36.50 |
|
|
|
23.33 |
|
|
|
15.89 |
|
|
|
6,735,861 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
46.25 |
|
|
|
38.14 |
|
|
|
21.26 |
|
|
|
17.20 |
|
|
|
6,058,653 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
49.80 |
|
|
|
38.80 |
|
|
|
23.31 |
|
|
|
17.92 |
|
|
|
7,238,668 |
|
2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
50.45 |
|
|
|
40.17 |
|
|
|
23.67 |
|
|
|
18.76 |
|
|
|
9,664,942 |
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November |
|
|
45.83 |
|
|
|
42.45 |
|
|
|
21.17 |
|
|
|
19.82 |
|
|
|
7,452,290 |
|
December |
|
|
49.80 |
|
|
|
45.30 |
|
|
|
23.31 |
|
|
|
20.91 |
|
|
|
6,584,957 |
|
2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January |
|
|
50.45 |
|
|
|
43.35 |
|
|
|
23.67 |
|
|
|
20.31 |
|
|
|
9,388,510 |
|
February |
|
|
47.30 |
|
|
|
42.60 |
|
|
|
22.46 |
|
|
|
20.18 |
|
|
|
9,860,462 |
|
March |
|
|
46.14 |
|
|
|
40.17 |
|
|
|
22.46 |
|
|
|
18.76 |
|
|
|
9,768,836 |
|
April |
|
|
48.65 |
|
|
|
45.20 |
|
|
|
23.93 |
|
|
|
22.24 |
|
|
|
8,920,665 |
|
May |
|
|
47.20 |
|
|
|
44.36 |
|
|
|
24.26 |
|
|
|
21.97 |
|
|
|
9,239,191 |
|
149
New York Stock Exchange
The tables below set forth the reported high and low closing sale prices per ADSs representing
four common shares and ADSs representing four preferred shares and their reported average daily
trading volume on the New York Stock Exchange for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMON SHARE ADS TRADED ON THE NYSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars per |
|
Average Number |
|
|
reais per ADS representing |
|
ADS representing |
|
of ADS representing |
|
|
Four Common Shares |
|
Four Common Shares |
|
Four Common |
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Shares Traded per Day |
2002 |
|
|
63.58 |
|
|
|
36.91 |
|
|
|
27.30 |
|
|
|
9.55 |
|
|
|
1,223,509 |
|
2003 |
|
|
84.77 |
|
|
|
46.22 |
|
|
|
29.27 |
|
|
|
12.94 |
|
|
|
1,044,189 |
|
2004 |
|
|
107.74 |
|
|
|
77.77 |
|
|
|
40.37 |
|
|
|
24.35 |
|
|
|
1,371,604 |
|
2005 |
|
|
167.06 |
|
|
|
101.24 |
|
|
|
73.40 |
|
|
|
37.41 |
|
|
|
1,754,301 |
|
2006 |
|
|
220.63 |
|
|
|
161.25 |
|
|
|
106.92 |
|
|
|
70.18 |
|
|
|
2,594,727 |
|
|
2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
131.47 |
|
|
|
101.24 |
|
|
|
49.81 |
|
|
|
37.41 |
|
|
|
1,967,233 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
126.29 |
|
|
|
104.29 |
|
|
|
52.97 |
|
|
|
41.00 |
|
|
|
1,313,044 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
167.06 |
|
|
|
118.03 |
|
|
|
73.37 |
|
|
|
49.54 |
|
|
|
1,808,566 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
166.45 |
|
|
|
132.48 |
|
|
|
73.40 |
|
|
|
58.95 |
|
|
|
1,941,263 |
|
2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
209.26 |
|
|
|
173.71 |
|
|
|
94.50 |
|
|
|
74.72 |
|
|
|
2,267,705 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
220.63 |
|
|
|
161.25 |
|
|
|
106.92 |
|
|
|
70.18 |
|
|
|
3,320,289 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
206.76 |
|
|
|
165.57 |
|
|
|
94.94 |
|
|
|
76.67 |
|
|
|
2,486,914 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
219.96 |
|
|
|
169.98 |
|
|
|
102.99 |
|
|
|
78.51 |
|
|
|
2,298,808 |
|
2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
213.22 |
|
|
|
180.16 |
|
|
|
101.32 |
|
|
|
84.52 |
|
|
|
3,099,114 |
|
2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November |
|
|
203.79 |
|
|
|
186.40 |
|
|
|
94.15 |
|
|
|
86.98 |
|
|
|
2,131,052 |
|
December |
|
|
219.96 |
|
|
|
203.46 |
|
|
|
102.99 |
|
|
|
93.90 |
|
|
|
1,834,865 |
|
2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January |
|
|
213.22 |
|
|
|
194.09 |
|
|
|
99.66 |
|
|
|
90.93 |
|
|
|
3,082,485 |
|
February |
|
|
209.41 |
|
|
|
189.34 |
|
|
|
99.46 |
|
|
|
89.68 |
|
|
|
2,800,289 |
|
March |
|
|
207.96 |
|
|
|
180.16 |
|
|
|
101.32 |
|
|
|
84.52 |
|
|
|
3,372,308 |
|
April |
|
|
218.69 |
|
|
|
203.63 |
|
|
|
107.58 |
|
|
|
99.87 |
|
|
|
2,467,030 |
|
May |
|
|
212.50 |
|
|
|
200.53 |
|
|
|
109.22 |
|
|
|
99.30 |
|
|
|
2,832,331 |
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PREFERRED SHARE ADS TRADED ON THE NYSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. dollars per |
|
Average Number |
|
|
reais per ADS representing |
|
ADS representing |
|
of ADS representing |
|
|
Four Preferred Shares |
|
Four Preferred Shares |
|
Four Preferred Shares |
|
|
High |
|
Low |
|
High |
|
Low |
|
Traded per Day |
2002 |
|
|
60.81 |
|
|
|
34.40 |
|
|
|
25.95 |
|
|
|
8.90 |
|
|
|
683,403 |
|
2003 |
|
|
77.50 |
|
|
|
41.57 |
|
|
|
26.79 |
|
|
|
11.63 |
|
|
|
671,236 |
|
2004 |
|
|
97.94 |
|
|
|
66.59 |
|
|
|
36.70 |
|
|
|
20.85 |
|
|
|
818,145 |
|
2005 |
|
|
150.34 |
|
|
|
89.91 |
|
|
|
66.20 |
|
|
|
33.43 |
|
|
|
1,184,789 |
|
2006 |
|
|
199.84 |
|
|
|
144.98 |
|
|
|
93.55 |
|
|
|
63.10 |
|
|
|
1,252,695 |
|
|
2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
115.73 |
|
|
|
90.84 |
|
|
|
43.62 |
|
|
|
33.43 |
|
|
|
1,567,575 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
110.87 |
|
|
|
89.91 |
|
|
|
46.50 |
|
|
|
35.60 |
|
|
|
904,878 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
147.74 |
|
|
|
103.74 |
|
|
|
64.93 |
|
|
|
42.78 |
|
|
|
1,161,931 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
150.34 |
|
|
|
118.14 |
|
|
|
66.20 |
|
|
|
52.57 |
|
|
|
1,121,729 |
|
2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
190.88 |
|
|
|
157.93 |
|
|
|
86.20 |
|
|
|
67.75 |
|
|
|
1,317,177 |
|
Second Quarter |
|
|
193.04 |
|
|
|
144.98 |
|
|
|
93.55 |
|
|
|
63.10 |
|
|
|
1,612,795 |
|
Third Quarter |
|
|
185.66 |
|
|
|
153.18 |
|
|
|
85.09 |
|
|
|
69.16 |
|
|
|
1,101,849 |
|
Fourth Quarter |
|
|
199.84 |
|
|
|
154.80 |
|
|
|
93.28 |
|
|
|
71.50 |
|
|
|
979,983 |
|
2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter |
|
|
194.44 |
|
|
|
161.62 |
|
|
|
90.88 |
|
|
|
75.51 |
|
|
|
1,619,225 |
|
2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November |
|
|
183.77 |
|
|
|
168.87 |
|
|
|
84.90 |
|
|
|
78.80 |
|
|
|
984,610 |
|
December |
|
|
199.84 |
|
|
|
183.05 |
|
|
|
93.28 |
|
|
|
84.48 |
|
|
|
788,195 |
|
2007: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January |
|
|
194.44 |
|
|
|
173.33 |
|
|
|
90.88 |
|
|
|
81.20 |
|
|
|
1,512,015 |
|
February |
|
|
189.39 |
|
|
|
169.77 |
|
|
|
90.11 |
|
|
|
80.41 |
|
|
|
1,627,249 |
|
March |
|
|
186.26 |
|
|
|
161.62 |
|
|
|
90.75 |
|
|
|
75.51 |
|
|
|
1,709,760 |
|
April |
|
|
194.36 |
|
|
|
181.36 |
|
|
|
95.61 |
|
|
|
89.22 |
|
|
|
1,438,028 |
|
May |
|
|
187.73 |
|
|
|
177.15 |
|
|
|
96.49 |
|
|
|
87.72 |
|
|
|
1,530,198 |
|
Markets
The São Paulo Stock Exchange
In Brazil, securities are traded only on the São Paulo Stock Exchange, with the exception of
electronically traded public debt securities. If you were to trade in our common or preferred
shares on the São Paulo Stock Exchange, your trade would settle in three business days after the
trade without adjustment of the purchase price for inflation. The seller is ordinarily required to
deliver the shares to the exchange on the third business day following the trade date. Delivery of
and payment for shares are made through the facilities of the clearinghouse, or Companhia
Brasileira de Liquidação e Custódia, known as CBLC.
The São Paulo Stock Exchange is a non-profit entity owned by its member brokerage firms.
Trading on each exchange is limited to member brokerage firms and a number of authorized
non-members. The São Paulo Stock Exchange opens electronic trading sessions each day from 11:00
a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Brazil local time, except during daylight savings time in the United States.
During daylight savings time in the United States, the sessions are from 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
Brazil local time, to closely mirror New York Stock Exchange trading hours. Trading is also
conducted between 11:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m., or between 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. during daylight
savings time in the United States, on an automated system known as the Sistema de Negociação
Assistida por Computador (Computer Assisted Trading System) on the São Paulo Stock Exchange. The
São Paulo Stock Exchange also permits trading from 6:45 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. (or from 5:45 p.m. to
7:00 p.m. during daylight savings time in the United States) on an online system connected to
traditional and internet brokers called the After Market. Trading on the After Market is subject
to regulatory limits on price volatility and on the volume of shares transacted through internet
brokers. There are no specialists or officially recognized market makers for our shares.
In order to better control volatility, the São Paulo Stock Exchange adopted a circuit
breaker system pursuant to which trading sessions may be suspended for a period of thirty minutes
or one hour whenever the indices
151
of these stock exchanges fall below the limits of 10% or 15%, respectively, in relation to the
index registered in the previous trading session.
The São Paulo Stock Exchange is less liquid than the New York Stock Exchange. At December 31,
2006, the aggregate market capitalization of the 352 companies listed on the São Paulo
Stock Exchange was approximately U.S$ 722.6 billion and the ten largest companies
represented approximately 51.3 % of the total market capitalization of all listed
companies. All the outstanding shares of an exchange-listed company may trade on the São Paulo
Stock Exchange, but in most cases, less than half of the listed shares are actually available for
trading by the public. The remainder is held by small groups of controlling persons, by
governmental entities or by one principal shareholder.
Trading on the São Paulo Stock Exchange by a holder not deemed to be a resident of Brazil for
Brazilian tax and regulatory purposes (a non-Brazilian holder) is subject to certain limitations
under Brazilian foreign investment legislation. With limited exceptions, non-Brazilian holders may
only trade on the São Paulo Stock Exchange in accordance with the requirements of Resolution No.
2,689 of January 26, 2000 of the National Monetary Council. Resolution No. 2,689 requires that
securities held by non-Brazilian holders be maintained in the custody of, or in deposit accounts
with, financial institutions duly authorized by the Central Bank of Brazil and the CVM. In
addition, Resolution No. 2,689 requires non-Brazilian holders to restrict their securities trading
to transactions on Brazilian stock exchanges or qualified over-the-counter markets. With limited
exceptions, non-Brazilian holders may not transfer the ownership of investments made under
Resolution No. 2,689 to other non-Brazilian holders through a private transaction.
The Brazilian custodian for the common and preferred shares underlying the ADSs must, on
behalf of the depositary for the ADSs, register with the Central Bank of Brazil to remit U.S.
dollars abroad for payments of dividends, any other cash distributions or sales proceeds upon the
disposition in Brazil of the shares. In the event that a holder of ADSs exchanges ADSs for common
or preferred shares, the holder will be entitled to continue to rely on the custodians
registration for five business days after the exchange. Thereafter, the holder may not be able to
obtain and remit U.S. dollars abroad upon the disposition of the common or preferred shares or
distributions relating to the common shares, unless the holder obtains a new registration. See Item
10. Additional InformationExchange Controls and Additional InformationBrazilian Tax
ConsiderationsTaxation of Gains for a description of exchange controls and certain tax benefits
extended to non-Brazilian holders who qualify under Resolution No. 2,689.
Regulation of the Brazilian Securities Markets
The Brazilian securities markets are principally governed by Law No. 6,385 of December 7,
1976, and the Brazilian Corporate Law, each as amended and supplemented, and by regulations issued
by the CVM, which has regulatory authority over the stock exchanges and securities markets
generally, the National Monetary Council, and the Central Bank of Brazil, which has licensing
authority over brokerage firms and regulates foreign investment and foreign exchange transactions.
These laws and regulations, among others, provide for disclosure requirements applicable to issuers
of traded securities, restrictions on insider trading and price manipulation and protection of
minority shareholders. They also provide for licensing and oversight of brokerage firms and
governance of the Brazilian stock exchanges. However, the Brazilian securities markets are not as
highly regulated and supervised as the U.S. securities markets.
Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, a company is either public (companhia aberta), such as we
are, or privately held (companhia fechada). All public companies, including us, are registered with
the CVM and are subject to reporting requirements. A company registered with the CVM may have its
securities traded on the Brazilian stock exchanges or in the Brazilian over-the-counter market. Our
common and preferred shares are listed and traded on the São Paulo Stock Exchange and may also be
traded privately, subject to some limitations.
In order to be listed on the São Paulo Stock Exchange, a company must apply for registration
with the CVM and the São Paulo Stock Exchange.
We have the option to ask that trading in our securities on the São Paulo Stock Exchange be
suspended in anticipation of a material announcement. Trading may also be suspended on the
initiative of the São Paulo Stock Exchange or the CVM, among other reasons, based on or due to a
belief that a company has provided inadequate
152
information regarding a material event or has provided inadequate responses to the inquiries
by the CVM or the São Paulo Stock Exchange.
The Brazilian over-the-counter market consists of direct trades between individuals in which a
financial institution registered with the CVM serves as intermediary. No special application, other
than registration with the CVM, is necessary for securities of a public company to be traded in
this market. The CVM requires that it be given notice of all trades carried out in the Brazilian
over-the-counter market by the intermediaries.
PifCo
PifCos common stock is not registered and there is no trading market for it. PifCos Senior
Notes are listed in the Luxembourg Stock Exchange. PifCos Global Notes due 2016 are registered on
the New York Stock Exchange. PifCos other debt securities have not been listed on any securities
exchange.
ITEM 10. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Memorandum and Articles of Incorporation of Petrobras
General
We are a publicly traded company duly registered with the CVM under No. 951-2. Article 3 of
our bylaws establishes our corporate purposes as research, prospecting, extraction, processing,
trade and transportation of crude oil from wells, shale and other rocks, of its derivatives,
natural gas and other fluid hydrocarbons, as well as other related or similar activities, such as
activities connected with energy, including research, development, production, transportation,
distribution, sale and trade of all forms of energy, as well as other related or similar
activities. We may conduct outside Brazil, directly or through our subsidiaries, any of the
activities within our corporate purpose.
Qualification of Directors
Brazilian law provides that only shareholders of a company may be appointed to its board of
directors, but there is no minimum share ownership or residency requirement for qualification as a
director. Members of our board of executive officers must be Brazilian nationals and reside in
Brazil. Our directors and executive officers are prevented from voting on any transaction involving
companies in which they hold more than 10% of the total capital stock or of which they have held a
management position in the period immediately prior to their taking office. Under our bylaws,
shareholders set the aggregate compensation payable to directors and executive officers. The Board
of Directors allocates the compensation among its members and the executive officers.
Allocation of Net Income
At each annual general shareholders meeting, our board of directors is required to recommend
how net profits for the preceding fiscal year are to be allocated. The Brazilian Corporate Law
defines net profits as net income after income taxes and social contribution taxes for such fiscal
year, net of any accumulated losses from prior fiscal years and any amounts allocated to employees
and managements participation in our profits. In accordance with the Brazilian Corporate Law, the
amounts available for dividend distribution or payment of interest on shareholders equity equals
net profits less any amounts allocated from such net profits to the legal reserve.
We are required to maintain a legal reserve, to which we must allocate 5% of net profits for
each fiscal year until the amount for such reserve equals 20% of our paid-in capital. However, we
are not required to make any allocations to our legal reserve in a fiscal year in which the legal
reserve, when added to our other established capital reserves, exceeds 30% of our capital. The
legal reserve can only be used to offset losses or to increase our capital.
As long as we are able to make the minimum mandatory distribution described below, we must
allocate an amount equivalent to 0.5% of subscribed and fully paid-in capital at year-end to a
statutory reserve. The reserve is
used to fund the costs of research and technological development programs. The accumulated
balance of this reserve cannot exceed 5% of the subscribed and fully paid-in capital stock.
153
Brazilian law also provides for three discretionary allocations of net profits that are
subject to approval by the shareholders at the annual general shareholders meeting, as follows:
|
|
|
first, a percentage of net profits may be allocated to a contingency reserve for
anticipated losses that are deemed probable in future years. Any amount so allocated in
a prior year must be either reversed in the fiscal year in which the reasons justifying
the reserve cease to exist, or written off in the event that the anticipated loss
occurs; |
|
|
|
|
second, if the mandatory distributable amount exceeds the sum of realized net
profits in a given year, this excess may be allocated to an unrealized revenue reserve.
The Brazilian Corporate Law defines realized net profits as the amount of net profits
that exceeds the sum of the net positive result of equity adjustments and profits or
revenues from operations whose financial results take place after the end of the next
succeeding fiscal year; and |
|
|
|
|
third, a portion of our net profits that exceeds the minimum mandatory distribution
may be allocated to fund working capital needs and investment projects, as long as such
allocation is based on a capital budget previously approved by our shareholders.
Capital budgets for more than one year must be reviewed at each annual shareholders
meeting. |
Mandatory Distribution
Under Brazilian Corporate Law, the bylaws of a Brazilian corporation may specify a minimum
percentage of the amounts available for distribution by such corporation for each fiscal year that
must be distributed to shareholders as dividends or interest on shareholders equity, also known as
the mandatory distributable amount, which cannot be lower than 25% of the adjusted net profit for
the fiscal year. Under our bylaws, the mandatory distributable amount has been fixed at an amount
equal to not less than 25% of our net profits, after the allocations to the legal reserve,
contingency reserve and unrealized revenue reserve. Furthermore, the net profits that are not
allocated to the reserves above to fund working capital needs and investment projects as described
above or to the statutory reserve must be distributed to our shareholders as dividends or interest
on shareholders equity.
The Brazilian Corporate Law, however, permits a publicly held company, such as ours, to
suspend the mandatory distribution if the board of directors and the Fiscal Council report to the
annual general shareholders meeting that the distribution would be inadvisable in view of the
companys financial condition. The suspension is subject to approval of holders of common shares.
In this case, the board of directors must file a justification for such suspension with the CVM.
Profits not distributed by virtue of the suspension mentioned above shall be allocated to a special
reserve and, if not absorbed by subsequent losses, shall be distributed as soon as the financial
condition of the company permits such payments.
Payment of Dividends and Interest on Shareholders Equity
We are required by the Brazilian Corporate Law and by our bylaws to hold an annual general
shareholders meeting by the fourth month after the end of each fiscal year at which, among other
things, the shareholders have to decide on the payment of an annual dividend. The payment of annual
dividends is based on the financial statements prepared for the relevant fiscal year.
Law No. 9,249 of December 26, 1995, as amended, provides for distribution of interest
attributed to shareholders equity to shareholders as an alternative form of distribution. Such
interest is limited to the daily pro rata variation of the TJLP interest rate, the Brazilian
governments long-term interest rate.
We may treat these payments as a deductible expense for corporate income tax and social
contribution purposes, but the deduction cannot exceed the greater of:
|
|
|
50% of net income (before taking into account such distribution and any deductions
for income taxes and after taking into account any deductions for social contributions
on net profits) for the period in respect of which the payment is made; or |
|
|
|
|
50% of retained earnings. |
154
Any payment of interest on shareholders equity to holders of ADSs or common shares, whether
or not they are Brazilian residents, is subject to Brazilian withholding tax at the rate of 15% or
25%. The 25% rate applies if the beneficiary is resident in a tax haven. See Brazilian Tax
Considerations. The amount paid to shareholders as interest attributed to shareholders equity,
net of any withholding tax, may be included as part of any mandatory distribution of dividends.
Under the Brazilian Corporate Law, we are required to distribute to shareholders an amount
sufficient to ensure that the net amount received, after payment by us of applicable Brazilian
withholding taxes in respect of the distribution of interest on shareholders equity, is at least
equal to the mandatory dividend.
Under the Brazilian Corporate Law and our bylaws, dividends generally are required to be paid
within 60 days following the date the dividend was declared, unless a shareholders resolution sets
forth another date of payment, which, in either case, must occur prior to the end of the fiscal
year in which the dividend was declared. The amounts of dividends due to our shareholders are
subject to financial charges at the SELIC rate (an interest rate applicable to certain Brazilian
government securities) from the end of each fiscal year through the date we actually pay such
dividends. Shareholders have a three-year period from the dividend payment date to claim dividends
or interest payments with respect to their shares, after which the amount of the unclaimed
dividends reverts to us.
Holders of preferred shares are entitled to priority in the distribution equal to the greater
of a 5% of their pro rata share of our paid-in capital, or 3% of their shares book value with a
participation equal to the common shares in corporate capital increases obtained from the
incorporation of reserves and profits.
Our board of directors may distribute dividends or pay interest based on the profits reported
in interim financial statements. The amount of interim dividends distributed cannot exceed the
amount of our capital reserves.
Shareholders Meetings
Our shareholders have the power to decide on any matters related to our corporate purposes and
to pass any resolutions they deem necessary for our protection and development, through voting at a
general shareholders meeting.
We convene our shareholders meetings by publishing a notice in the Diário Oficial da União
(Official Gazette), Jornal do Commercio, Gazeta Mercantil and Valor Econômico. The notice must be
published no fewer than three times, beginning at least 15 calendar days prior to the scheduled
meeting date. The notice must contain the meetings agenda and, in the case of a proposed amendment
to the bylaws, an indication of the subject matter. For ADS holders, we are required to provide
notice to the ADS depositary at least 30 calendar days prior to a shareholders meeting.
The board of directors or, in some specific situations set forth in the Brazilian Corporate
Law, the shareholders, call our general shareholders meetings. A shareholder may be represented at
a general shareholders meeting by an attorney-in-fact, so long as the attorney-in-fact was
appointed within a year of the meeting. The attorney-in-fact must be a shareholder, a member of our
management, a lawyer or a financial institution. The attorney-in-facts power of attorney must
comply with certain formalities set forth by Brazilian law.
In order for a valid action to be taken at a shareholders meeting, shareholders representing
at least one quarter of our issued and outstanding common shares must be present at the meeting.
However, in the case of a general meeting to amend our bylaws, shareholders representing at least
two-thirds of our issued and outstanding common shares must be present. If no such quorum is
present, the board may call a second meeting giving at least eight calendar days notice prior to
the scheduled meeting in accordance with the rules of publication described above. The quorum
requirements will not apply to the second meeting, subject to the voting requirements for certain
matters described below.
Voting Rights
Pursuant to the Brazilian Corporate Law and our bylaws, each of our common shares carries the
right to vote at a general meeting of shareholders. The Brazilian government is required by law to
own at least a majority of our voting stock. Pursuant to our bylaws, our preferred shares generally
do not confer voting rights.
Holders of common shares, voting at a general shareholders meeting, have the exclusive power to:
155
|
|
|
amend our bylaws; |
|
|
|
|
approve any capital increase beyond the amount of the authorized capital; |
|
|
|
|
approve any capital reduction; |
|
|
|
|
approve the appraisal of any assets used by a shareholder to subscribe for our shares; |
|
|
|
|
elect or dismiss members of our board of directors and Fiscal Council, subject to
the right of our preferred shareholders to elect or dismiss one member of our board of
directors and to elect one member of our Fiscal Council; |
|
|
|
|
receive the yearly financial statements prepared by our management and accept or
reject managements financial statements, including the allocation of net profits for
payment of the mandatory dividend and allocation to the various reserve accounts; |
|
|
|
|
authorize the issuance of debentures, except for the issuance of non-convertible
unsecured debentures, which may be approved by our board of directors; |
|
|
|
|
suspend the rights of a shareholder who has not fulfilled the obligations imposed by
law or by our bylaws; |
|
|
|
|
accept or reject the valuation of assets contributed by a shareholder in
consideration for issuance of capital stock; |
|
|
|
|
pass resolutions to approve corporate restructurings, such as mergers, spin-offs and
transformation into another type of company; |
|
|
|
|
participate in a centralized group of companies; |
|
|
|
|
approve the disposal of the control of our subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
|
approve the disposal of convertible debentures issued by our subsidiaries and held by us; |
|
|
|
|
establish the compensation of our senior management; |
|
|
|
|
approve the cancellation of our registration as a publicly-traded company; |
|
|
|
|
decide on our dissolution or liquidation; |
|
|
|
|
waive the right to subscribe to shares or convertible debentures issued by our
subsidiaries or affiliates; and |
|
|
|
|
choose a specialized company to work out the appraisal of our shares by economic
value, in cases of the canceling of our registry as a publicly-traded company or
deviation from the standard rules of corporate governance defined by a stock exchange
or an entity in charge of maintaining an organized over-the-counter market registered
with the CVM, in order to comply with such corporate governance rules and with
contracts that may be executed by us and such entities. |
Except as otherwise provided by law, resolutions of a general shareholders meeting are passed
by the majority of the outstanding common shares. Abstentions are not taken into account.
The approval of holders of at least one-half of the issued and outstanding common shares is
required for the following actions involving our company:
|
|
|
reduction of the mandatory dividend distribution; |
156
|
|
|
merger into another company or consolidation with another company, subject to the
conditions set forth in the Brazilian Corporate Law; |
|
|
|
|
participation in a group of companies subject to the conditions set forth in the
Brazilian Corporate Law; |
|
|
|
|
change of our corporate purpose, which must be preceded by an amendment in our
bylaws by federal law as we are controlled by the government and our corporate purpose
is established by law; |
|
|
|
|
cessation of the state of liquidation; |
|
|
|
|
spin-off of a portion of our company, subject to the conditions set forth in the
Brazilian Corporate Law; |
|
|
|
|
transfer of all our shares to another company or receipt of shares of another
company in order to make the company whose shares are transferred a wholly-owned
subsidiary of such company, known as incorporação de ações; and |
|
|
|
|
approval of our liquidation. |
According to the Brazilian Corporate Law, the following actions shall be submitted for
approval by the outstanding adversely affected preferred shares before they are submitted for
approval of at least half of the issued and outstanding common shares:
|
|
|
creation of preferred shares or increase in the existing classes of preferred
shares, without preserving the proportions to any other class of preferred shares,
except as set forth in or authorized by the companys bylaws; |
|
|
|
|
change in the preferences, privileges or redemption or amortization conditions of
any class of preferred shares; and |
|
|
|
|
creation of a new class of preferred shares entitled to more favorable conditions
than the existing classes. |
Decisions on our transformation into another type of company require the unanimous approval of
our shareholders, including the preferred shareholders, and an amendment of our bylaws by the
federal law.
Our preferred shares will acquire voting rights if we fail to pay the minimum dividend to
which such shares are entitled for three consecutive fiscal years. The voting right shall continue
until payment has been made. Preferred shareholders also obtain the right to vote if we enter into
a liquidation process.
Under Brazilian Corporate Law, shareholders representing at least 10% of the companys voting
capital have the right to demand that a cumulative voting procedure be adopted to entitle each
common share to as many votes as there are board members and to give each common share the right to
vote cumulatively for only one candidate or to distribute its votes among several candidates.
Furthermore, minority common shareholders holding at least 10% of our voting capital also have the
right to appoint or dismiss one member to or from our Fiscal Council.
Preferred shareholders holding, individually or as a group, 10% of our total capital have the
right to appoint and/or dismiss one member to or from our board of directors. Preferred
shareholders have the right to separately appoint one member to our Fiscal Council.
Our bylaws provide that, independently from the exercise of the rights above granted to
minority shareholders, through cumulative voting process, the Brazilian government always has the
right to appoint the majority of our directors.
157
Preemptive Rights
Pursuant to the Brazilian Corporate Law, each of our shareholders has a general preemptive
right to subscribe for shares or securities convertible into shares in any capital increase, in
proportion to the number of shares held by them. In the event of a capital increase that would
maintain or increase the proportion of capital represented by the preferred shares, holders of
preferred shares would have preemptive rights to subscribe to newly issued preferred shares only.
In the event of a capital increase that would reduce the proportion of capital represented by the
preferred shares, holders of preferred shares would have preemptive rights to subscribe to any new
preferred shares in proportion to the number of shares held by them, and to common shares only to
the extent necessary to prevent dilution of their interests in our total capital.
A period of at least 30 days following the publication of notice of the issuance of new shares
or securities convertible into shares is allowed for exercise of the right, and the right is
negotiable. According to our bylaws, our board of directors may eliminate preemptive rights or
reduce the exercise period in connection with a public exchange made to acquire control of another
company or in connection with a public offering of shares or securities convertible into shares.
In the event of a capital increase by means of the issuance of new shares, holders of ADSs, of
common or preferred shares, would have, except under circumstances described above, preemptive
rights to subscribe for any class of our newly issued shares. However, you may not be able to
exercise the preemptive rights relating to the preferred shares underlying your ADSs unless a
registration statement under the Securities Act is effective with respect to those rights or an
exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act is available. See Item 3. Key
InformationRisk FactorsRisks Relating to our Equity and Debt Securities.
Redemption and Rights of Withdrawal
Brazilian law provides that, under limited circumstances, a shareholder has the right to
withdraw his or her equity interest from the company and to receive payment for the portion of
shareholders equity attributable to his or her equity interest.
This right of withdrawal may be exercised by the holders of the adversely affected common or
preferred shares in the event that we decide:
|
|
|
to create preferred shares or to increase the existing classes of preferred shares,
without preserving the proportions to any other class of preferred shares, except as
set forth in or authorized by our bylaws; or |
|
|
|
|
to change the preferences, privileges or redemption or amortization conditions of
any class of preferred shares or to create a new class of preferred shares entitled to
more favorable conditions than the existing classes. |
Holders of our common shares may exercise their right of withdrawal in the event we decide:
|
|
|
to merge into another company or to consolidate with another company, subject to the
conditions set forth in the Brazilian Corporate Law; or |
|
|
|
|
to participate in a centralized group of companies as defined under the Brazilian
Corporate Law and subject to the conditions set forth therein. |
The right of withdrawal may also be exercised by our dissenting shareholders in the event we
decide:
|
|
|
to reduce the mandatory distribution of dividends; |
|
|
|
|
to change our corporate purposes; |
|
|
|
|
to spin-off a portion of our company, subject to the conditions set forth in the
Brazilian Corporate Law; |
158
|
|
|
to transfer all of our shares to another company or to receive shares of another
company in order to make the company whose shares are transferred a wholly-owned
subsidiary of our company, known as incorporação de ações; or |
|
|
|
|
to acquire control of another company at a price, which exceeds the limits set forth
in the Brazilian Corporate Law, subject to, the conditions set forth in the Brazilian
Corporate Law. |
This right of withdrawal may also be exercised in the event that the entity resulting from a
merger, incorporação de ações, as described above, or consolidation or spin-off of a listed company
fails to become a listed company within 120 days of the shareholders meeting at which such
decision was taken.
Any redemption of shares arising out of the exercise of such withdrawal rights would be made
based on the book value per share, determined on the basis of the last balance sheet approved by
our shareholders. However, if a shareholders meeting giving rise to redemption rights occurred
more than 60 days after the date of the last approved balance sheet, a shareholder would be
entitled to demand that his or her shares be valued on the basis of a new balance sheet dated
within 60 days of such shareholders meeting. The right of withdrawal lapses 30 days after
publication of the minutes of the shareholders meeting that approved the corporate actions
described above. We would be entitled to reconsider any action giving rise to withdrawal rights
within 10 days following the expiration of such rights if the withdrawal of shares of dissenting
shareholders would jeopardize our financial stability.
Other Shareholders Rights
According to the Brazilian Corporate Law, neither a companys bylaws nor actions taken at a
general meeting of shareholders may deprive a shareholder of some specific rights, such as:
|
|
|
the right to participate in the distribution of profits; |
|
|
|
|
the right to participate equally and ratably in any remaining residual assets in the
event of liquidation of the company; |
|
|
|
|
the right to supervise the management of the corporate business as specified in the
Brazilian Corporate Law; |
|
|
|
|
the right to preemptive rights in the event of a subscription of shares, debentures
convertible into shares or subscription bonuses (other than with respect to a public
offering of such securities, as may be set out in the bylaws); and |
|
|
|
|
the right to withdraw from the company in the cases specified in the Brazilian
Corporate Law. |
Liquidation
In the event of a liquidation, holders of preferred shares are entitled to receive, prior to
any distribution to holders of common shares, an amount equal to the paid-in capital with respect
to the preferred shares.
Conversion Rights
According to our bylaws, our common shares are not convertible into preferred shares, nor are
preferred shares convertible into common shares.
Liability of Our Shareholders for Further Capital Calls
Neither Brazilian law nor our bylaws provide for capital calls. Our shareholders liability
for capital calls is limited to the payment of the issue price of the shares subscribed or
acquired.
159
Form and Transfer
Our shares are registered in book-entry form and we have hired Banco do Brasil to perform all
the services of safe-keeping and transfer of shares. To make the transfer, Banco do Brasil makes an
entry in the register, debits the share account of the transferor and credits the share account of
the transferee.
Our shareholders may choose, at their individual discretion, to hold their shares through
CBLC. Shares are added to the CBLC system through Brazilian institutions, which have clearing
accounts with the CBLC. Our shareholder registry indicates which shares are listed on the CBLC
system. Each participating shareholder is in turn registered in a registry of beneficial
shareholders maintained by the CBLC and is treated in the same manner as our registered
shareholders.
Dispute Resolution
Our bylaws provide for mandatory dispute resolution through arbitration, in accordance with
the rules of the Câmara de Arbitragem do Mercado (Market Arbitration Chamber), with respect to any
dispute regarding us, our shareholders, the officers, directors and Fiscal Council members and
involving the provisions of the Brazilian Corporate Law, our bylaws, the rules of the National
Monetary Council, the Central Bank of Brazil and the CVM or any other capital markets legislation,
including the provisions of any agreement entered into by us with any stock exchange or
over-the-counter entity registered with the CVM, relating to adoption of differentiated corporate
governance practices.
However, decisions of the Brazilian government, as exercised through voting in any general
shareholders meeting, are not subject to this arbitration proceeding, in accordance with Article
238 of the Brazilian Corporate Law.
Self-dealing Restrictions
Our controlling shareholder, the Brazilian government, and the members of our board of
directors, board of executive officers and Fiscal Council are required, in accordance with our
bylaws, to:
|
|
|
refrain from dealing with our securities either in the one-month period prior to any
fiscal year-end, up to the date when our financials are published, or in the period
between any corporate decision to raise or reduce our stock capital, to distribute
dividends or stock, and to issue any security, up to the date when the respective
public releases are published; and |
|
|
|
|
communicate to us and to the stock exchange their periodical dealing plans with
respect to our securities, if any, including any change or default in these plans. If
the communication is an investment or divestment plan, the frequency and planned
quantities must be included. |
Restrictions on Non-Brazilian Holders
Non-Brazilian holders face no legal restrictions on the ownership of our common or preferred
shares or of ADSs based on our common or preferred shares, and are entitled to all the rights and
preferences of such common or preferred shares, as the case may be.
However, the ability to convert dividend payments and proceeds from the sale of common or
preferred shares or preemptive rights into foreign currency and to remit such amounts outside
Brazil is subject to restrictions under foreign investment legislation which generally requires,
among other things, the registration of the relevant investment with the Central Bank of Brazil.
Nonetheless, any non-Brazilian holder who registers with the CVM in accordance with Resolution No.
2,689 may buy and sell securities on the São Paulo Stock Exchange without obtaining a separate
certificate of registration for each transaction.
In addition, Annex III to Resolution No. 1,289 of the National Monetary Council, as amended,
known as Annex III Regulations, allows Brazilian companies to issue depositary receipts in foreign
exchange markets. We currently have an ADR program for our common and preferred shares duly
registered with the CVM and the Central
160
Bank of Brazil. The proceeds from the sale of ADSs by
holders outside Brazil are free of Brazilian foreign investment controls.
Transfer of Control
According to Brazilian law and our bylaws, the Brazilian government is required to own at
least the majority of our voting shares. Therefore, any change in our control would require a
change in the applicable legislation.
Disclosure of Shareholder Ownership
Brazilian regulations require that any person or group of persons representing the same
interest that has directly or indirectly acquired or sold an interest corresponding to 5% of the
total number of shares of any type or class must disclose its share ownership or divestment to the
CVM and the São Paulo Stock Exchange. In addition, a statement containing the required information
must be published in the newspapers. Any subsequent increase or decrease by 5% or more in ownership
of shares of any type or class must be similarly disclosed.
Memorandum and Articles of Association of PifCo
Register
PifCo is an exempted company incorporated with limited liability in the Cayman Islands under
the Companies Law, as amended, with company registration number 76600. PifCo registered and filed
its Memorandum and Articles of Association with the Registrar of Companies on September 24, 1997.
The company adopted a revised amended and restated memorandum and articles of association by sole
shareholder special resolution on May 7, 2007. PifCo was initially incorporated with the name
Brasoil Finance Company, which name was changed by special resolution of PifCos shareholders to
Petrobras International Finance Company on September 25, 1997.
The last amendment to PifCos Memorandum & Articles of
Association occurred on May 7th, 2007, to increase
the capital stock and to amend the stated purpose of PifCo.
Objects and Purposes
PifCos Memorandum and Articles of Association grants PifCo full power and authority to
conduct marketing, sales, financing, purchase, storage and transportation of petroleum, natural gas
and all other hydrocarbons and by-products thereof and any business incidental thereto.
As a matter of Cayman Islands law, PifCo cannot trade in the Cayman Islands except in
furtherance of the business carried on outside the Cayman Islands.
Directors
Directors may vote on a proposal, arrangement or contract in which they are interested.
However, interested directors must declare the nature of their interest at a directors meeting. If
the interested directors declare their interest, their votes are counted and they are counted in
the quorum of such meeting.
The directors may, in PifCos name, exercise their powers to borrow money, issue debt
securities and to mortgage or charge any of the undertaking or property of PifCo and are generally
responsible for its day-to-day management and administration.
Directors are not required to own shares.
Rights and Obligations of Shareholders
Dividends
Shareholders may declare dividends in a general meeting but the dividends cannot exceed the
amount recommended by the directors. The directors may pay the shareholders interim dividends and
may, before
161
recommending any dividend, set aside reserves out of profits. The directors can invest
these reserves in their discretion or employ them in PifCos business.
Dividends may be paid in cash or in kind but may only be paid out of profits or, subject to
certain restrictions of Cayman Islands law, a share premium account.
Voting Rights
Votes may be cast at a general meeting by a show of hands or by a poll. On a vote by a show of
hands, each shareholder or shareholder represented by proxy has one vote. On a vote by a poll, each
shareholder or shareholder represented by proxy has one vote for each share owned.
Directors are elected by ordinary resolution by the shareholders at general meetings or by a
board resolution of the directors. Shareholders are not entitled to vote at a general meeting
unless calls or other amounts payable on their shares have been paid. In lieu of voting on a matter
at a general meeting, the shareholders entitled to vote on that matter may adopt the matter by
signing a written resolution.
Redemption
PifCo may issue shares, which are redeemable by PifCo or by its shareholders, on such
terms and in such manner as the Directors may determine before the issuance of such shares. PifCo
may repurchase its own shares on such terms and in such manner as the Directors may determine and
agree with the relevant shareholder.
Shareholder Rights Upon Liquidation
If PifCo is liquidated, the liquidator may (in accordance with an ordinary shareholder
resolution):
|
|
|
set a fair value on PifCos assets, divide all or part of PifCos assets among the
shareholders and determine how the assets will be divided among shareholders or classes
of shareholders; and |
|
|
|
|
vest all or part of PifCos assets in trustees. |
Shareholders will not be compelled to accept any securities on which there is a liability.
Calls on Shares
Directors may make calls on the shareholders to the extent any amounts remain unpaid on their
shares. Each shareholder shall pay to the company the amounts called on such shares.
Change to Rights of Shareholders
Shareholders may change the rights of their class of shares by:
|
|
|
getting the written consent of two-thirds of the shareholders of that class; or |
|
|
|
|
passing a special resolution at a meeting of the shareholders of that class. |
There are no general limitations on the rights to own shares specified by the articles.
General Meetings
A general meeting may be convened:
|
|
|
by the directors at any time; or |
|
|
|
|
by any two shareholders holding not less than 10% of the paid-up voting share
capital of PifCo, by written request. |
Notice of a general meeting is given to all shareholders.
162
All business carried out at a general meeting is considered special business except:
|
|
|
sanctioning a dividend; |
|
|
|
|
consideration of the accounts, balance sheets, and ordinary report of the directors and auditors; |
|
|
|
|
appointment and removal of directors; and |
|
|
|
|
fixing of remuneration of the auditors. |
Unanimous shareholder consent is required to carry out special business at a meeting unless
notice of the special business is given in the notice of the meeting. A quorum of shareholders is
required to be present at any meeting in order to carry out business. One or more shareholders
holding at least a majority of the shares of PifCo that are present in person or represented by
proxy is a quorum.
There is no requirement under Cayman Islands law to convene an annual meeting or to convene
any general meeting of the shareholders. The directors are permitted to designate any general
meeting of shareholders as an annual general meeting.
Liability of Shareholders
In normal circumstances, the liability of any shareholder to PifCo is limited to the amount,
which such shareholder has agreed to pay in respect of the subscription of his shares.
Changes in Capital
PifCo may increase its authorized share capital by ordinary resolution. The new shares will be
subject to all of the provisions to which the original shares are subject.
PifCo may also by ordinary resolution:
|
|
|
consolidate and divide all or any of its share capital into shares of a larger
amount than its existing shares; |
|
|
|
|
convert all or any part of its paid-up shares into stock and reconvert that stock
into paid-up shares of any denomination; |
|
|
|
|
split existing shares into shares of a smaller amount, subject to the provisions of
Section 13 of the Companies Law; and |
|
|
|
|
cancel any shares, which, at the date of the resolution, are not held or agreed to
be held by any person and diminish the amount of its share capital by
the amount of the shares so cancelled. |
PifCo may reduce its share capital and any capital redemption reserve by special resolution in
accordance with relevant provision of Cayman Islands law.
Indemnity
PifCos directors and officers are indemnified out of its assets and funds against all
actions, proceedings, costs, charges, expenses, losses, damages or liabilities which they incur or
sustain in or regarding the conduct of PifCos business or affairs in the execution or discharge of
their respective duties, powers, authorities or discretions.
Under PifCos Memorandum of Association, directors and officers are excused from all liability
to PifCo, except for any losses, which arise as a result of such partys own dishonesty.
163
Accounts
Accounts relating to PifCos affairs are kept in such manner as may be determined from time to
time by the directors and may be audited in such manner as may be determined from time to time by
the directors. There is, however, no requirement as a matter of Cayman Islands law to have PifCos
accounts audited.
Amendment of the Articles
PifCo may, by special resolution of the shareholders, amend its memorandum and articles of
association.
Transfer out of Jurisdiction
PifCo may, by special resolution of the shareholders, transfer out of the Cayman Islands into
any jurisdiction permitting such transfer.
Material Contracts
Petrobras
Concession Agreements with the ANP
As provided in the Oil Law, we were granted the exclusive right, for a period of 27 years from
the declaration of commercial feasibility, to exploit the crude oil reserves in all fields where we
had previously commenced production. In addition, the Oil Law established a procedural framework
for us to claim exclusive exploratory rights for a period of up to three years, which was later
extended to five years, with respect to areas where we could demonstrate that we had established
prospects. In case of drilling success in this exploration period we could claim development
rights. To perfect our claim to explore and develop these areas, we had to demonstrate that we had
the required financial capacity to carry out these activities, either alone or through cooperative
arrangements.
On August 6, 1998, we signed concession contracts with the ANP relating to 397 areas,
consisting of 231 production areas, 115 exploration areas and 51 development areas. In May 1999, we
relinquished 26 exploratory areas out of the 115 initially granted to us by the ANP, and obtained
an extension of our exclusive exploration period from three to five years with respect to 34
exploration areas aggregating 44.0 million acres (178,033 square kilometers) and from three to six
years with respect to two exploration areas aggregating 7.3 million acres (29,415 square
kilometers).
The areas of the concessions not awarded to us by the ANP have been, and will continue to be,
awarded through public auctions conducted by the ANP. Regarding the eight auctions conducted thus
far, we have executed several concession contracts and currently retain concessionaire rights under
459 of these contracts. It should also be clarified that 305 of these contracts refer to areas
where we are already conducting exploitation activities and 154 refer to areas where we have
exploration rights.
Although we have also acquired rights to execute contracts for 21 new concession areas in Bid
Round 8, the concession contracts related thereto have not been signed yet due to an injunction
granted in November 2006 by Brazilian Courts in order to suspend the auction. See Item 4.
Information on the CompanyExploration, Development and ProductionExploration
ActivitiesExploration Bidding Rounds.
According to the Oil Law and under our concession agreements with the ANP we are required to
pay the following:
|
|
|
signature bonuses; |
|
|
|
|
royalties; |
|
|
|
|
special participation charge; and |
164
|
|
|
rentals for the occupation or retention of areas. |
The minimum signature bonuses are published in the bidding rules for the concessions being
auctioned, but the actual amount is based on the amount of the winning bid and has to be paid upon
the execution of the concession agreement. The rentals for the occupation and retention of the
concession areas are also provided for in the related bidding rules and are payable annually. For a
discussion of royalties, special participation fees and rentals, see Item 5. Operating and
Financial Review and ProspectsEffect of Taxes on Our Income.
With respect to onshore fields, the Oil Law also requires us to pay the owner of the land a
special participation fee that varies between 0.5% and 1.0% of the net operating revenues derived
from the production of the field.
For information concerning our other material contracts, see Item 4. Information on the
Company and Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and Prospects.
PifCo
For a description of PifCos material agreements, see PifCo Senior Notes, PifCo Global
Notes and Sale of Future Receivables.
Statements contained in this annual report regarding the contents of any contract or other
document are not necessarily complete, and, where the contract or other document is an exhibit to
the annual report, each of these statements is qualified in all aspects by the provisions of the
actual contract or other documents.
Exchange Controls Petrobras
There are no restrictions on ownership of the common or preferred shares by individuals or legal
entities domiciled outside Brazil.
The right to convert dividend payments and proceeds from the sale of shares into foreign
currency and to remit such amounts outside Brazil may be subject to restrictions under foreign
investment legislation, which generally requires, among other things, that the relevant investments
be registered with the Central Bank of Brazil. If any restrictions are imposed on the remittance of
foreign capital abroad, they could hinder or prevent Companhia Brasileira de liquidação e Custódia,
or CBLC, as custodian for the common and preferred shares represented by the American Depositary
Shares, or registered holders who have exchanged American Depositary Shares for common shares or
preferred shares, from converting dividends, distributions or the proceeds from any sale of such
common shares or preferred shares, as the case may be, into U.S. dollars and remitting the U.S.
dollars abroad.
Foreign investors may register their investment under Law No. 4,131 of September 3, 1962 or
Resolution No. 2,689. Registration under Resolution No. 2,689 affords favorable tax treatment to
foreign investors who are not resident in a tax haven, as defined by Brazilian tax laws. See
Brazilian Tax Considerations.
Under Resolution No. 2,689, foreign investors may invest in almost all financial assets and
engage in almost all transactions available in the Brazilian financial and capital markets,
provided that certain requirements are fulfilled. In accordance with Resolution No. 2,689, the
definition of foreign investor includes individuals, legal entities, mutual funds and other
collective investment entities, domiciled or headquartered abroad.
Under Resolution No. 2,689, a foreign investor must:
|
|
|
appoint at least one representative in Brazil, with powers to perform actions
relating to its investment; |
|
|
|
|
appoint an authorized custodian in Brazil for its investments; |
|
|
|
|
register as a foreign investor with the CVM; and |
|
|
|
|
register its foreign investment with the Central Bank of Brazil. |
165
Securities and other financial assets held by a Resolution No. 2,689 investor must be
registered or maintained in deposit accounts or under the custody of an entity duly licensed by the
Central Bank of Brazil or the CVM. In addition, any transfer of securities held under Resolution
No. 2,689 must be carried out in the stock exchanges or through organized over-the-counter markets
licensed by the CVM, except for transfers resulting from a corporate reorganization or occurring
upon the death of an investor by operation of law or will.
Holders of American Depositary Shares who have not registered their investment with the
Central Bank of Brazil could be adversely affected by delays in, or refusals to grant, any required
government approval for conversions of payments made in reais and remittances abroad of these
converted amounts.
Annex III Regulations provide for the issuance of depositary receipts in foreign markets with
respect to shares of Brazilian issuers. The depositary of the ADSs has obtained from the Central
Bank of Brazil an electronic certificate of registration with respect to our existing ADR program.
Pursuant to the registration, the custodian and the depositary will be able to convert dividends
and other distributions with respect to the relevant shares represented by ADSs into foreign
currency and to remit the proceeds outside Brazil. Following the closing of an international
offering, the electronic certificate of registration will be amended by the depositary with respect
to the ADSs sold in the international offering and will be maintained by the Brazilian custodian
for the relevant shares on behalf of the depositary.
In the event that a holder of ADSs exchanges such ADSs for the underlying shares, the holder
will be entitled to continue to rely on such electronic registration for five business days after
the exchange. Thereafter, unless the relevant shares are held pursuant to Resolution No. 2,689 by a
duly registered investor, or a holder of the relevant shares applies for and obtains a new
certificate of registration from the Central Bank of Brazil, the holder may not be able to convert
into foreign currency and to remit outside Brazil the proceeds from the disposition of, or
distributions with respect to, the relevant shares, and the holder, if not registered under
Resolution No. 2,689, will be subject to less favorable Brazilian tax treatment than a holder of
ADSs. In addition, if the foreign investor resides in a tax haven jurisdiction, the investor will
be also subject to less favorable tax treatment. See Item 3. Key InformationRisk FactorsRisks
Relating to Our Equity and Debt Securities and Brazilian Tax Considerations.
PifCo
There are:
|
|
|
no governmental laws, decrees or regulations in Cayman Islands that restrict the
export or import of capital, including dividend and other payments to holders of notes
who are not residents of the Cayman Islands, provided that such holders are not
resident in countries subject to certain sanctions by the United Nations or the
European Union, and |
|
|
|
|
no limitations on the right of nonresident or foreign owners imposed by Cayman
Island law or PifCos Memorandum of Association to hold or vote PifCos shares. |
Taxation relating to our ADSs and common and preferred shares
The following summary contains a description of material Brazilian and U.S. federal income tax
considerations that may be relevant to the purchase, ownership and disposition of preferred or
common shares or ADSs by a holder. This summary does not describe any tax consequences arising
under the laws of any state, locality or taxing jurisdiction other than Brazil and the United
States.
This summary is based upon the tax laws of Brazil and the United States as in effect on the
date of this annual report, which are subject to change (possibly with retroactive effect). This
summary is also based upon the representations of the depositary and on the assumption that the
obligations in the deposit agreement and any related documents will be performed in accordance with
their respective terms.
This description is not a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that may
be relevant to any particular investor, including tax considerations that arise from rules of
general application to all taxpayers or to certain classes of investors or that are generally
assumed to be known by investors. Prospective purchasers of
166
common or preferred shares or ADSs
should consult their own tax advisors as to the tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and
disposition of common or preferred shares or ADSs.
There is no income tax treaty between the United States and Brazil. In recent years, the tax
authorities of Brazil and the United States have held discussions that may culminate in such a
treaty. We cannot predict, however, whether or when a treaty will enter into force or how it will
affect the U.S. holders of common or preferred shares or ADSs.
Brazilian Tax Considerations
General
The following discussion summarizes the material Brazilian tax consequences of the
acquisition, ownership and disposition of preferred or common shares or ADSs, as the case may be,
by a holder that is not domiciled in Brazil, also called a non-Brazilian holder, for purposes of
Brazilian taxation and, in the case of a holder of preferred or common shares, which has registered
its investment in preferred or common shares at the Central Bank of Brazil as a U.S. dollar
investment.
Under Brazilian law, investors may invest in the preferred or common shares under Resolution
No. 2,689 or under Law No. 4,131 of September 3, 1962. Investments under Resolution No. 2,689
afford favorable tax treatment to foreign investors who are not resident in a tax haven
jurisdiction. The rules of Resolution No. 2,689 allow foreign investors to invest in almost all
instruments and to engage in almost all transactions available in the Brazilian financial and
capital markets, provided that certain requirements are met. In accordance with Resolution No.
2,689, the definition of foreign investor includes individuals, legal entities, mutual funds and
other collective investment entities, domiciled or headquartered abroad.
Pursuant to this rule, foreign investors must: (1) appoint at least one representative in
Brazil with powers to perform actions relating to the foreign investment; (2) complete the
appropriate foreign investor registration form; (3) register as a foreign investor with the CVM;
and (4) register the foreign investment with the Central Bank of Brazil.
Securities and other financial assets held by foreign investors pursuant to Resolution No.
2,689 must be registered or maintained in deposit accounts or under the custody of an entity duly
licensed by the Central Bank of Brazil or the CVM. In addition, securities trading is restricted to
transactions carried out in the stock exchanges or organized over-the-counter markets licensed by
the CVM.
Taxation of Dividends
Dividends paid by us, including stock dividends and other dividends paid in property to the
depositary in respect of the ADSs, or to a non-Brazilian holder in respect of the preferred or
common shares, are currently not subject to withholding tax in Brazil.
We must pay to our shareholders (including holders of common or preferred shares or ADSs)
interest on the amount of dividends payable to them, at the SELIC rate (the interest rate
applicable to certain Brazilian government securities), from the end of each fiscal year through
the date of effective payment of those dividends. These interest payments are considered as
fixed-yield income and are subject to withholding income tax at varying rates depending on the
length of period of interest accrual. The tax rate ranges from 15%, in case of interest accrued for
a period greater than 720 days, to 22.5%, in case of interest accrued for a period up to 180 days.
However, holders of ADSs and holders of common or preferred shares not resident or domiciled in tax
haven jurisdictions (see Beneficiaries Residing or Domiciled in Tax Havens or Low Tax
Jurisdictions) investing under Resolution No. 2,689 are subject to such withholding tax at a
reduced rate, currently at 15%.
Taxation on Interest on Shareholders Equity
Any payment of interest on shareholders equity (see Memorandum and Articles of
Incorporation of PetrobrasPayment of Dividends and Interest on Shareholders Equity) to holders
of ADSs or preferred or common shares, whether or not they are Brazilian residents, is subject to
Brazilian withholding income tax at the
167
rate of 15% at the time we record such liability, whether
or not the effective payment is made at that time. In the case of non-Brazilian residents that are
resident in a tax haven jurisdiction, the applicable withholding income tax rate is 25% (see
Beneficiaries Residing or Domiciled in Tax Havens or Low Tax Jurisdictions). The payment of
interest at the SELIC rate that is applicable to payments of dividends applies equally to payments
of interest on shareholders equity. The determination of whether or not we will make distributions
in the form of interest on shareholders equity or in the form of dividends is made by our board of
directors at the time distributions are to be made. We cannot determine how our board of directors
will make these determinations in connection with future distributions.
Taxation of Gains
For purposes of Brazilian taxation, there are two types of non-Brazilian holders of ADSs or
preferred or common shares: (1) non-Brazilian holders that are not resident or domiciled in a tax
haven jurisdiction (see Beneficiaries Residing or Domiciled in Tax Havens or Low Tax
Jurisdictions), and that, in the case of holders of preferred or common shares, are registered
before the Central Bank of Brazil and the CVM to invest in Brazil in accordance with Resolution No.
2,689; and (2) other non-Brazilian holders, which include any and all non-residents of Brazil who
invest in equity securities of Brazilian companies through any other means (including under Law No.
4,131 of 1962) and all types of investors that are located in tax haven jurisdictions. The
investors identified in clause (1) above are subject to favorable tax treatment in Brazil, as
described below.
According to Law nº 10,833, dated December 29, 2003, capital gains realized on the disposition
of tangible assets located in Brazil, by non-Brazilian residents, whether or not to other
non-residents and whether made outside or within Brazil, are subject to taxation in Brazil at a
rate of 15% (a rate of 25% is applicable if realized by investors resident in a tax haven
jurisdiction, i.e. a country that does not impose any income tax or that imposes tax at a maximum
rate of less than 20%). We understand the ADSs do not fall within the definition of tangible assets
located in Brazil for the purposes of this law, but there is still no pronunciation from tax
authorities nor judicial court rulings in this respect. Therefore, we are unable to predict whether
such understanding will prevail in the courts of Brazil.
The deposit of preferred or common shares in exchange for ADSs may be subject to Brazilian
capital gains at the rate of 15% if the amount previously registered with the Central Bank of
Brazil as a foreign investment in the preferred or common shares is lower than:
(1) the average price per preferred or common share on a Brazilian stock exchange on which the
greatest number of such shares were sold on the day of deposit; or
(2) if no preferred or common shares were sold on that day, the average price on the Brazilian
stock exchange on which the greatest number of preferred or common shares were sold in the 15
trading sessions immediately preceding such deposit. In such a case, the difference between the
amount previously registered and the average price of the preferred or common shares calculated as
above, will be considered a capital gain. Investors registered under Resolution No. 2,689 and not
located in a tax haven jurisdiction are exempt from this type of taxation. The withdrawal of ADSs
in exchange for preferred or common shares is not subject to Brazilian tax. On receipt of the
underlying preferred or common shares, the non-Brazilian holder registered under Resolution No.
2,689 will be entitled to register the U.S. dollar value of such shares with the Central Bank of
Brazil as described below in Registered Capital.
Non-Brazilian holders are not subject to tax in Brazil on gains realized on sales of preferred
or common shares that occur abroad to non-Brazilian holders.
Non-Brazilian holders which are not located in a tax haven jurisdiction are subject to income
tax imposed at a rate of 15% on gains realized on sales or exchanges of the preferred or common
shares that occur in Brazil or with a resident of Brazil, other than in connection with
transactions on the Brazilian stock, future or commodities
exchanges. With respect to proceeds of a redemption or of a liquidating distribution with
respect to the preferred or common shares, the difference between the amount effectively received
by the shareholder and the amount of foreign currency registered with the Central Bank of Brazil,
accounted for in reais at the commercial market rate on the date of the redemption or liquidating
distribution, will be also subject to income tax at a rate of 15% given that such transactions are
treated as a sale or exchange not carried out on the Brazilian stock, future and commodities
exchanges.
168
Gains realized arising from transactions on the Brazilian stock, future or commodities
exchanges by an investor registered under Resolution No. 2,689 who is not located in a tax haven
jurisdiction are exempt from Brazilian income tax. Otherwise, gains realized on transactions
related to the Brazilian stock, future or commodities exchanges are subject to income tax at a rate
of 20%.
Therefore, non-Brazilian holders are subject to income tax imposed at a rate of 20% on gains
realized on sales or exchanges of preferred or common shares that occur on the stock exchange
unless such a sale is made by a non-Brazilian holder who is not resident in a tax haven
jurisdiction and:
(1) such sale is made within five business days of the withdrawal of such preferred or common
shares in exchange for ADSs and the proceeds thereof are remitted abroad within such five-day
period; or
(2) such sale is made under Resolution No. 2,689 by registered non-Brazilian holders who
obtain registration with the CVM.
In these two cases, the transaction will not be subject to taxation in Brazil. The gain
realized is for tax purposes the difference between the amount in reais realized on the sale or
exchange and the acquisition cost measured in reais, without any adjustment to account for
inflation of the shares sold. The gain realized as a result of a transaction that occurs other
than on the stock exchange will be the positive difference between the amount realized on the sale
or exchange and the acquisition cost of the preferred or common shares, both such values to be
taken into account in reais. There are reasonable grounds, however, to hold that the gain
realized should be calculated based on the foreign currency amount registered with the Central
Bank of Brazil, such foreign currency amount to be translated into reais at the commercial market
rate on the date of such sale or exchange.
Any exercise of preemptive rights relating to the preferred or common shares will not be
subject to Brazilian taxation. Any gain on the sale or assignment of preemptive rights relating to
the preferred or common shares by the depositary on behalf of holders of the ADSs will be subject
to Brazilian income taxation according to the same rules applicable to the sale or disposition of
preferred or common shares, unless such sale or assignment is performed on the stock exchange by an
investor under Resolution No. 2,689 who is not resident in a tax haven jurisdiction, in which case
the gains are exempt from income tax.
There is no assurance that the current preferential treatment for holders of the ADSs and some
non-Brazilian holders of the preferred or common shares under Resolution No. 2,689 will continue in
the future.
Taxation of Foreign Exchange Transactions (IOF/Câmbio)
Under Decree No. 4,494 of December 3, 2002, the conversion into Brazilian currency of proceeds
received by a Brazilian entity from a foreign investment in the Brazilian securities market
(including those in connection with an investment in preferred or common shares or the ADSs and
those under Resolution No. 2, 689) and the conversion into foreign currency of proceeds received by
a non-Brazilian holder is subject to a tax on exchange transactions known as IOF/Câmbio, which is
currently applicable at a zero percent rate in most transactions. However, according to Law No.
8,894 of June 21, 1994, the IOF/Câmbio rate may be increased at any time to a maximum of 25% by a
decision of the Minister of Finance, but only in relation to exchange transactions carried out
after the increase of the applicable rate.
Taxation on Bonds and Securities Transactions (IOF/Títulos)
Law No. 8,894 created the Tax on Bonds and Securities Transactions, or IOF/Títulos, which may
be imposed on any transactions involving bonds and securities carried out in Brazil, even if these
transactions are performed on the Brazilian stock, futures or commodities exchange. As a general
rule, the rate of this tax is currently
zero but the Brazilian government may increase such rate up to 1.5% per day, but only in
relation to transactions carried out after the increase of the applicable rate.
Other Brazilian Taxes
There are no Brazilian inheritance, gift or succession taxes applicable to the ownership,
transfer or disposition of preferred or common shares or ADSs by a non-Brazilian holder, except for
gift and inheritance taxes
169
which are levied by some states of Brazil on gifts made or inheritances
bestowed by individuals or entities not resident or domiciled in Brazil to individuals or entities
resident or domiciled within such states in Brazil. There are no Brazilian stamp, issue,
registration, or similar taxes or duties payable by holders of preferred or common shares or ADSs.
Tax on Bank Account Transactions (CPMF)
The Contribuição Provisória sobre Movimentação Financeira (Tax on Bank Account Transactions,
or CPMF), is imposed on any debit to bank accounts. As a result, transactions by the depositary or
by holders of preferred or common shares, which involve the transfer of Brazilian currency through
Brazilian financial institutions, are subject to the CPMF tax at a rate of 0.38%. These
transactions include situations where a non-Brazilian holder transfers the proceeds from the sale
or assignment of preferred or common shares by an exchange transaction, in which case the CPMF tax
will be levied on the amount to be remitted abroad in reais. If we have to perform any exchange
transaction in connection with ADSs or preferred or common shares, we will also be subject to the
CPMF tax. The financial institution that carries out the relevant financial transaction will be
responsible for collecting the applicable CPMF tax.
Withdrawals from deposit accounts of Brazilian or non-Brazilian residents, for the acquisition
of shares in public offerings registered with CVM, but not in stock exchange, are subject to a zero
percent CPMF tax rate, provided that the issuer is registered for negotiation of the shares in a
stock exchange.
The CPMF will not be levied in the liquidation of stock acquisitions in public offers
registered with the Comissão de Valores Mobiliários (Securities and Exchange Commission, or CVM),
provided that the issuing company is listed in a stock exchange.
Beneficiaries Resident or Domiciled in Tax Havens or Low Tax Jurisdictions
Law No. 9,779 of January 1, 1999 states that, except for limited prescribed circumstances,
income derived from transactions by a beneficiary, resident or domiciliary of a country considered
a tax haven is subject to withholding income tax at the rate of 25%. Tax havens are considered to
be countries which do not impose any income tax or which impose such tax at a maximum rate of less
than 20%. Accordingly, if the distribution of interest attributed to shareholders equity is made
to a beneficiary resident or domiciled in a tax haven jurisdiction, the applicable income tax rate
will be 25% instead of 15%. Capital gains are not subject to this 25% tax, even if the beneficiary
is resident in a tax haven jurisdiction. See Taxation of Gains.
Registered Capital
The amount of an investment in preferred or common shares held by a non-Brazilian holder who
obtains registration under Resolution No. 2,689, or by the depositary representing such holder, is
eligible for registration with the Central Bank of Brazil; such registration (the amount so
registered being called registered capital) allows the remittance outside Brazil of foreign
currency, converted at the commercial market rate, acquired with the proceeds of distributions on,
and amounts realized with respect to dispositions of, such preferred or common shares. The
registered capital for each preferred or common share purchased as part of the international
offering or purchased in Brazil after the date hereof, and deposited with the depositary will be
equal to its purchase price (in U.S. dollars). The registered capital for a preferred or common
share that is withdrawn upon surrender of an ADS will be the U.S. dollar equivalent of:
|
|
|
the average price of a preferred or common share on the Brazilian stock exchange on
which the greatest number of such shares were sold on the day of withdrawal; or |
|
|
|
|
if no preferred or common shares were sold on that day, the average price on the
Brazilian stock exchange on which the greatest number of preferred or common shares
were sold in the 15 trading sessions immediately preceding such withdrawal. |
The U.S. dollar value of the average price of preferred or common shares is determined on the
basis of the average of the U.S. dollar/real commercial market rates quoted by the Central Bank of
Brazil information system on that date (or, if the average price of preferred or common shares is
determined under the second option above, the
170
average of such average quoted rates on the same 15
dates used to determine the average price of preferred or common shares).
A non-Brazilian holder of preferred or common shares may experience delays in effecting such
registration, which may delay remittances abroad. Such a delay may adversely affect the amount, in
U.S. dollars, received by the non-Brazilian holder. See Item 3. Key InformationRisk FactorsRisks
Relating to Our Equity and Debt Securities.
U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations
The statements regarding U.S. tax law set forth below are based on U.S. law as in force on the
date of this annual report, and changes to such law subsequent to the date of this annual report
may affect the tax consequences described herein. This summary describes the principal tax
consequences of the ownership and disposition of common or preferred shares or ADSs, but it does
not purport to be a comprehensive description of all of the tax consequences that may be relevant
to a decision to hold or dispose of common or preferred shares or ADSs. This summary applies only
to purchasers of common or preferred shares or ADSs who will hold the common or preferred shares or
ADSs as capital assets and does not apply to special classes of holders such as dealers in
securities or currencies, holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar, holders of 10%
or more of our shares (taking into account shares held directly or through depositary
arrangements), tax-exempt organizations, financial institutions, holders liable for the alternative
minimum tax, securities traders who elect to account for their investment in common or preferred
shares or ADSs on a mark-to-market basis, and persons holding common or preferred shares or ADSs in
a hedging transaction or as part of a straddle or conversion transaction.
EACH HOLDER SHOULD CONSULT SUCH HOLDERS OWN TAX ADVISOR CONCERNING THE OVERALL TAX CONSEQUENCES TO
IT, INCLUDING THE CONSEQUENCES UNDER LAWS OTHER THAN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX LAWS, OF AN INVESTMENT
IN COMMON OR PREFERRED SHARES OR ADSs.
Shares of our preferred stock will be treated as equity for U.S. federal income tax purposes.
In general, for purposes of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the Code), a holder of an ADS
will be treated as the holder of the shares of common or preferred stock represented by those ADSs,
and no gain or loss will be recognized if you exchange an ADS for the shares of common or preferred
stock represented by that ADS.
In this discussion, references to ADSs refer to ADSs with respect to both common and preferred
shares, and references to a U.S. holder are to a holder of an ADS that:
|
|
|
is a citizen or resident of the United States of America, |
|
|
|
|
is a corporation organized under the laws of the United States of America or any state thereof; or |
|
|
|
|
is otherwise subject to U.S. federal income taxation on a net basis with respect to
the shares or the ADS. |
Taxation of Distributions
A U.S. holder will recognize ordinary dividend income for U.S. federal income tax purposes in
an amount equal to the amount of any cash and the value of any property we distribute as a dividend
to the extent that such distribution is paid out of our current or accumulated earnings and
profits, as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes, when such distribution is received by
the custodian, or by the U.S. holder in the case of a holder of common or preferred shares. The
amount of any distribution will include the amount of Brazilian tax withheld on
the amount distributed, and the amount of a distribution paid in reais will be measured by
reference to the exchange rate for converting reais into U.S. dollars in effect on the date the
distribution is received by the custodian, or by a U.S. holder in the case of a holder of common or
preferred shares. If the custodian, or U.S. holder in the case of a holder of common or preferred
shares, does not convert such reais into U.S. dollars on the date it receives them, it is possible
that the U.S. holder will recognize foreign currency loss or gain, which would be ordinary loss or
gain, when the reais are converted into U.S. dollars. Dividends paid by us will not be eligible
for the dividends received deduction allowed to corporations under the Code.
171
Subject to certain exceptions for short-term and hedged positions, the U.S. dollar amount of
dividends received by an individual prior to January 1, 2011 with respect to the ADSs will be
subject to taxation at a maximum rate of 15% if the dividends are qualified dividends. Dividends
paid on the ADSs will be treated as qualified dividends if (i) the ADSs are readily tradable on an
established securities market in the United States and (ii) the Company was not, in the year prior
to the year in which the dividend was paid, and is not, in the year in which the dividend is paid,
a passive foreign investment company (PFIC). The ADSs are listed on the New York Stock Exchange,
and will qualify as readily tradable on an established securities market in the United States so
long as they are so listed. Based on the Companys audited financial statements and relevant market
and shareholder data, the Company believes that it was not treated as a PFIC for U.S. federal
income tax purposes with respect to its 2005 or 2006 taxable year. In addition, based on the
Companys audited financial statements and its current expectations regarding the value and nature
of its assets, the sources and nature of its income, and relevant market and shareholder data, the
Company does not anticipate becoming a PFIC for its 2007 taxable year. Based on existing guidance,
it is not clear whether dividends received with respect to the shares will be treated as qualified
dividends, because the shares are not themselves listed on a U.S. exchange. In addition, the U.S.
Treasury has announced its intention to promulgate rules pursuant to which holders of ADSs and
intermediaries through whom such securities are held will be permitted to rely on certifications
from issuers to treat dividends as qualified for tax reporting purposes. Because such procedures
have not yet been issued, it is not clear whether the Company will be able to comply with the
procedures.
Distributions out of earnings and profits with respect to the shares or ADSs generally will be
treated as dividend income from sources outside of the United States and generally will be treated
as passive income (or, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2006, as passive category
income) for foreign tax credit purposes. Subject to certain limitations, Brazilian income tax
withheld in connection with any distribution with respect to the shares or ADSs may be claimed as a
credit against the U.S. federal income tax liability of a U.S. holder if such U.S. holder elects
for that year to credit all foreign income taxes. Alternatively, such Brazilian withholding tax may
be taken as a deduction against taxable income. Foreign tax credits may not be allowed for
withholding taxes imposed in respect of certain short-term or hedged positions in securities or in
respect of arrangements in which a U.S. holders expected economic profit is insubstantial. U.S.
holders should consult their own tax advisors concerning the implications of these rules in light
of their particular circumstances.
Holders of ADSs that are foreign corporations or nonresident alien individuals (non-U.S.
holders) generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or withholding tax on
distributions with respect to shares or ADSs that are treated as dividend income for U.S. federal
income tax purposes unless such dividends are effectively connected with the conduct by the holder
of a trade or business in the United States.
Holders of shares and ADSs should consult their own tax advisers regarding the availability of
the reduced dividend tax rate in the light of the considerations discussed above and their own
particular circumstances.
Taxation of Capital Gains
Upon the sale or other disposition of a share or an ADS, a U.S. holder will generally
recognize gain or loss for U.S. federal income tax purposes. The amount of the gain or loss will be
equal to the difference between the amount realized in consideration for the disposition of the
share or the ADS and the U.S. holders tax basis in the share or the ADS. Such gain or loss
generally will be subject to U.S. federal income tax and will be treated as capital gain or loss.
The net amount of long-term capital gain recognized by an individual holder before January 1, 2011
generally is subject to taxation at a maximum rate of 15%. Capital losses may be deducted from
taxable income, subject to certain limitations.
A non-U.S. holder will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax or withholding tax on gain
realized on the sale or other disposition of a share or an ADS unless:
|
|
|
such gain is effectively connected with the conduct by the holder of a trade or
business in the United States; or |
|
|
|
|
such holder is an individual who is present in the United States of America for 183
days or more in the taxable year of the sale and certain other conditions are met. |
172
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
Dividends paid on, and proceeds from the sale or other disposition of, the ADSs or common or
preferred shares to a U.S. holder generally may be subject to the information reporting
requirements of the Code and may be subject to backup withholding unless the U.S. holder provides
an accurate taxpayer identification number or otherwise establishes an exemption. The amount of
any backup withholding collected from a payment to a U.S. holder will be allowed as a credit
against the U.S. holders U.S. federal income tax liability and may entitle the U.S. holder to a
refund, provided that certain required information is furnished to the Internal Revenue Service.
A non-U.S. holder generally will be exempt from these information reporting requirements and
backup withholding tax, but may be required to comply with certain certification and identification
procedures in order to establish its eligibility for such exemption.
Taxation relating to PifCos notes
The following summary contains a description of material Cayman Islands, Brazilian and U.S.
federal income tax considerations that may be relevant to the purchase, ownership, and disposition
of PifCos debt securities. This summary does not describe any tax consequences arising under the
laws of any state, locality or taxing jurisdiction other than the Cayman Islands, Brazil and the
United States.
This summary is based on the tax laws of the Cayman Islands, Brazil and the United States as
in effect on the date of this annual report, which are subject to change (possibly with retroactive
effect). This description is not a comprehensive description of all of the tax considerations that
may be relevant to any particular investor, including tax considerations that arise from rules of
general application to all taxpayers or to certain classes of investors or that are generally
assumed to be known by investors. Prospective purchasers of notes should consult their own tax
advisors as to the tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of notes.
There is no tax treaty to avoid double taxation between the Cayman Islands and the United
States, the Cayman Islands and Brazil or Brazil and the United States. In recent years, the tax
authorities of Brazil and the United States have held discussions that may culminate in such a
treaty. We cannot predict, however, whether or when a treaty will enter into force or how it will
affect the U.S. holders of notes.
Cayman Islands Taxation
Under current law, PifCo is not subject to income, capital, transfer, sales or other taxes in
the Cayman Islands.
PifCo was incorporated as an exempted company under the laws of the Cayman Islands on
September 24, 1997. PifCo has received an Undertaking as to Tax Concessions pursuant to Section 6
of the Tax Concessions Law (1999 Revision) which provides that, for a period of twenty years from
the date thereof no law hereafter enacted in the Cayman Islands imposing any tax or duty to be
levied on income or on capital assets, gains or appreciation will apply to any of PifCos income or
property and which is deemed to provide that no tax is to be levied on profits, income, gains or
appreciations or which is in the nature of estate duty or inheritance tax shall be payable or in
respect of shares, debentures or other of PifCos obligations, or by way of withholding of any part
of a payment of principal due under a debenture or other of PifCos obligations.
No Cayman Islands withholding tax applies to distributions by PifCo in respect of the notes.
Noteholders are not subject to any income, capital, transfer, sales or other taxes in the Cayman
Islands in respect of their purchase, holding or disposition of the notes.
Noteholders whose notes are brought into or issued in the Cayman Islands will be liable to pay
stamp duty of up to C.I.$.250 on each note.
173
Brazil Taxation
The following discussion is a summary of the Brazilian tax considerations relating to an
investment in the notes by a non-resident of Brazil. The discussion is based on the tax laws of
Brazil as in effect on the date hereof and is subject to any change in Brazilian law that may come
into effect after such date. The information set forth below is intended to be a general discussion
only and does not address all possible consequences relating to an investment in the notes.
INVESTORS SHOULD CONSULT THEIR OWN TAX ADVISERS AS TO THE CONSEQUENCES OF PURCHASING THE NOTES,
INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, THE CONSEQUENCES OF THE RECEIPT OF INTEREST AND THE SALE, REDEMPTION
OR REPAYMENT OF THE NOTES OR COUPONS.
Generally, an individual, entity, trust or organization domiciled for tax purposes outside
Brazil (a Non-resident) is taxed in Brazil only when income is derived from Brazilian sources.
Therefore, any gains or income paid by PifCo in respect of the notes issued by it in favor of
Non-resident noteholders are not subject to Brazilian taxes.
Interest (including original issuer discount, or OID, fees, commissions, expenses and any
other income payable by a Brazilian resident to a non-resident) is generally subject to income tax
withheld at source. Currently, the rate of withholding tax is 15% or such other lower rate as
provided for in an applicable tax treaty between Brazil and another country. If the recipient of
the payment is domiciled in a tax haven jurisdiction, as defined by Brazilian tax regulations, the
rate will be 25%.
If the payments with respect to the notes are made by a Brazilian source, the noteholders will
be indemnified so that, after payment of all applicable Brazilian taxes collectable by withholding,
deduction or otherwise, with respect to principal, interest (including the OID) and additional
amounts payable with respect to the notes (plus any interest and penalties thereon), a noteholder
will retain an amount equal to the amounts that such noteholder would have retained had no such
Brazilian taxes (plus interest and penalties thereon) been payable. The Brazilian obligor will,
subject to certain exceptions, pay additional amounts in respect of such withholding or deduction
so that the holder receives the net amount due.
According to Law nº 10,833, dated December 29, 2003, capital gains realized on the disposition
of tangible assets located in Brazil, by non-Brazilian residents, whether or not to other
non-residents and whether made outside or within Brazil, are subject to taxation in Brazil at a
rate of 15% (a rate of 25% is applicable if realized by investors resident in a tax haven
jurisdiction, i.e. a country that does not impose any income tax or that imposes tax at a maximum
rate of less than 20%). We understand the notes do not fall within the definition of tangible
assets located in Brazil for the purposes of this law, but there is still no pronunciation from tax
authorities nor judicial court rulings in this respect. Therefore, we are unable to predict whether
such understanding will prevail in the courts of Brazil.
Generally, there are no inheritance, gift, succession, stamp, or other similar taxes in Brazil
with respect to the ownership, transfer, assignment or any other disposition of the notes by a
Non-resident, except for gift and inheritance taxes imposed by some Brazilian states on gifts or
bequests by individuals or entities not domiciled or residing in Brazil to individuals or entities
not domiciled or residing within such states.
U.S. Federal Income Taxation
The following summary sets forth certain United States federal income tax considerations that
may be relevant to a holder of a note that is, for U.S. federal income purposes, a citizen or
resident of the United States or a domestic corporation or that otherwise is subject to the United
States federal income tax on a net income basis in respect of the notes (a U.S. holder). This
summary is based upon the Code, its legislative history, existing and proposed U.S. Treasury
regulations promulgated thereunder, published rulings by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service, or the
IRS, and court decisions, all in effect as of the date hereof, all of which authorities are subject
to change or differing interpretations, which changes or differing interpretations could apply
retroactively. This summary does not purport to discuss all aspects of the United States federal
income taxation which may be relevant to particular investors, such as financial institutions,
insurance companies, dealers or traders in securities or currencies, regulated investment
companies, tax-exempt organizations, certain short-term holders of notes, persons that hedge their
174
exposure in the notes or hold notes as part of a position in a straddle or as part of a hedging
transaction or conversion transaction for U.S. federal tax purposes, persons that enter into a
constructive sale transaction with respect to the notes or U.S. Holder whose functional currency
as defined in Section 985 of the code is not the U.S. dollar. U.S. holders should be aware that
the U.S. federal income tax consequences of holding the notes may be materially different for
investors described in the prior sentence.
In addition, this summary does not discuss any foreign, state or local tax considerations.
This summary only applies to original purchasers of notes who purchase notes at the original issue
price and hold the notes as capital assets (generally, property held for investment) within the
meaning of Section 1221 of the Code.
EACH HOLDER SHOULD CONSULT SUCH HOLDERS OWN TAX ADVISOR CONCERNING THE OVERALL TAX CONSEQUENCES TO
IT, INCLUDING THE CONSEQUENCES UNDER LAWS OTHER THAN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX LAWS, OF AN INVESTMENT
IN THE NOTES.
Payments of interest
Payments of qualified stated interest (as defined below) on a note (including additional
amounts, if any) generally will be taxable to a U.S. holder as ordinary interest income when such
interest is accrued or received, in accordance with the U.S. holders regular method of tax
accounting. In general, if the issue price of a note is less than the stated redemption price at
maturity by more than a de minimis amount, such note will be considered to have OID. The issue
price of a note is the first price at which a substantial amount of such notes are sold to
investors. The stated redemption price at maturity of a note generally includes all payments other
than payments of qualified stated interest (as defined below).
In general, each U.S. holder of a note, whether such holder uses the cash or the accrual
method of tax accounting, will be required to include in gross income as ordinary interest income
the sum of the daily portions of OID on the note for all days during the taxable year that the
U.S. holder owns the note. The daily portions of OID on a note are determined by allocating to each
day in any accrual period a ratable portion of the OID allocable to that accrual period. In
general, in the case of an initial holder, the amount of OID on a note allocable to each accrual
period is determined by (a) multiplying the adjusted issue price, as defined below, of the note
at the beginning of the accrual period by the yield to maturity of the note, and (b) subtracting
from that product the amount of qualified stated interest allocable to that accrual period. U.S.
holders should be aware that they generally must include OID in gross income as ordinary interest
income for U.S. federal income tax purposes as it accrues, in advance of the receipt of cash
attributable to that income. The adjusted issue price of a note at the beginning of any accrual
period will generally be the sum of its issue price (generally including accrued interest, if any)
and the amount of OID allocable to all prior accrual periods, reduced by the amount of all payments
other than payments of qualified stated interest (if any) made with respect to such note in all
prior accrual periods. The term qualified stated interest generally means stated interest that is
unconditionally payable in cash or property (other than debt instruments of the issuer) at least
annually during the entire term of a note at a single fixed rate of interest, or subject to certain
conditions, based on one or more interest indices.
Interest income, including OID, in respect of the notes will constitute foreign source income
for United sates federal income tax purposes and, with certain exceptions, will be treated
separately, together with other items of passive income (or, for taxable years beginning after
December 31, 2006, of passive category income), for
purposes of computing the foreign tax credit allowable under the United states federal income
tax laws. The calculation of foreign tax credits, involves the application complex of rules that
depend on a U.S. holders particular circumstances. U.S. holders should consult their own tax
advisors regarding the availability of foreign tax credits and the treatment of additional amounts.
Sale or disposition of notes
A U.S. holder generally will recognize capital gain or loss upon the sale, exchange,
retirement or other disposition of a note in an amount equal to the difference between the amount
realized upon such sale, exchange, retirement or other disposition (other than amounts attributable
to accrued qualified stated interest, which will be taxed as such) and such U.S. holders adjusted
tax basis in the note. A U.S. Holders adjusted tax basis in the note generally will equal the U.S.
holders cost for the note increased by any amounts included in gross income by such
175
U.S. holder as
OID and reduced by any payments other than payments of qualified stated interest on that note. Gain
or loss realized by a U.S. Holder on the sale, exchange, retirement or other disposition of a note
generally will be the United States source gain or loss for the United States federal income tax
purposes unless it is attributable to an office or other fixed place of business outside the United
States and certain other conditions are met. The gain or loss realized by a U.S. holder will be
capital gain or loss, and will be long-term capital gain or loss if the notes were held for more
than one year. The net amount of long-term capital gain recognized by an individual holder before
January 1, 2011 generally is subject to taxation at a maximum rate of 15%.
Backup Withholding and Information Reporting
A U.S. holder may, under certain circumstances, be subject to backup withholding with
respect to certain payments to that U.S. holder, unless the holder (i) is a corporation or comes
within certain other exempt categories, and demonstrates this fact when so required, or (ii)
provides a correct taxpayer identification number, certifies that it is not subject to backup
withholding and otherwise complies with applicable requirements of the backup withholding rules.
Any amount withheld under these rules generally will be creditable against the U.S. holders U.S.
federal income tax liability. While Non-U.S. holders generally are except from backup withholding,
a Non-U.S. holder may, in certain circumstances, be required to comply with certain information and
identification procedures in order to prove entitlement to this exemption.
Non-U.S. Holder
A holder or beneficial owner of a note that is not a U.S. holder (a non-U.S. holder)
generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax on interest received on the
notes. In addition, a non-U.S. holder will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax
on gain realized on the sale of notes unless, in the case of gain realized by an individual
non-U.S. holder, the non-U.S. holder is present in the United States for 183 days or more in the
taxable year of the sale and certain other conditions are met.
Documents on Display
Statements contained in this annual report regarding the contents of any contract or other
document are not necessarily complete, and, where the contract or other document is an exhibit to
the annual report, each of these statements is qualified in all respects by the provisions of the
actual contract or other documents.
We are subject to the information requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, applicable to a foreign private issuer, and accordingly, we file or furnish reports,
information statements and other information with the SEC. These reports and other information
filed by us can be inspected at, and subject to the payment of any required fees, copies may be
obtained from, the Public Reference Room of the SEC, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. As
a foreign private issuer, we were not required to make filings with the SEC by electronic means
prior to November 4, 2002, although we were permitted to do so. Any filings we make electronically
will be available to the public over the internet at the SECs website at http://www.sec.gov.
Reports and other information may also be inspected and copied at the offices of the New York
Stock Exchange, 20 Broad Street, New York, New York 10005. As a foreign private issuer, however, we
are exempt from the proxy requirements of Section 14 of the Exchange Act and from the short-swing
profit recovery rules of Section
16 of the Exchange Act, although the rules of the New York Stock Exchange may require us to
solicit proxies from our shareholders under some circumstances. Our website is located at
http://www.petrobras.com.br. The information on our website is not part of this annual report.
The Prepayment Agreement.
Pursuant to a prepayment agreement entered into by us and PFL, we
undertook to deliver, for as long as any Senior and Junior Trust Certificates remain outstanding,
in each quarterly period, a quantity of Eligible Products having a market value equal to any
scheduled payments of interest on and principal of the Senior and Junior Trust Certificates.
The Master Export Contract
As long as any Senior Trust Certificates or any amounts payable to the insurers remain
outstanding, we will deliver, in each quarterly period, a quantity of Eligible Products having a
value equal to any scheduled payments of
176
interest, principal or other amounts due under the Senior
Trust Certificates. Under the Master Export Contract, we export and sell Eligible Products to PFL
during each quarterly period:
|
|
|
in an amount equal to at least 80% of the total volume of all fuel oil (Heavy Fuel
Oil) exported by us during that quarterly period; and |
|
|
|
|
with a value (based upon the net invoice price at which such Eligible Products are
actually sold by PFL) equal to at least: |
|
|
|
|
(a) the highest aggregate amount scheduled to be paid by the Trustee in any
quarterly period during the remaining term of any series of Senior Trust Certificates at
the time outstanding, with respect to interest, principal and other amounts due under
the Senior Trust Certificates multiplied by |
|
|
|
|
(b) a factor that fluctuates between 2.0 and 3.0, depending upon the level of
sales of Eligible Products by PFL that are contracted to be made under arrangements that
provide for a minimum price per barrel or other hedging arrangements and the relevant
minimum price or price established by such hedging arrangements. |
We also agree that our average daily gross exports of fuel oil for any rolling twelve-month
period will be equal to at least 50,000 barrels of fuel oil. We are not relieved of our obligations
to deliver Eligible Products under the Master Export Contract or the Prepayment Agreement, for any
reason, including, without limitation, as a result of force majeure or on non-payment by PFL.
The summary of the Master Export Contract that is presented above reflects the amendments
executed after the consent. The amendments became effective June 1, 2006.
ITEM 11. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Petrobras
General
We are exposed to a number of market risks arising from our normal business activities. Such
market risks principally involve the possibility that changes in commodity prices, currency
exchange rates or interest rates will adversely affect the value of our financial assets and
liabilities or future cash flows and earnings.
Although we currently produce approximately 80% of our crude oil requirements for Petrobras
refineries in Brazil, we import a substantial amount of crude oil, as well as smaller quantities of
diesel, liquefied petroleum gas, naphtha and other oil products. We also export crude oil, bunker
fuel, fuel oil and gasoline. Virtually all of the prices for these imports and exports are payable
in U.S. dollars even though substantially all our revenues are collected in reais (despite the fact
these prices are partly based on international prices). In addition, a substantial portion of our
indebtedness and some of our operating expenses are, and we expect them to continue to be,
denominated in or indexed to U.S. dollars or other foreign currencies. See Item 4. Information on
the CompanyRegulation of the
Oil and Gas Industry in Brazil for the manner in which the Brazilian government has
controlled the prices we charge.
The principal market for our products is Brazil and substantially all of our revenues are
denominated in reais. We have described above under Item 4. Information on the CompanyRegulation
of the Oil and Gas Industry in BrazilPrice Regulation the manner in which the Brazilian
government has regulated the prices we charge.
Risk Management
The market risks we face consist principally of commodity price risk, and to a lesser extent,
interest rate risk and exchange rate risk.
177
Our management of risk exposures is evolving under the policies of our executive officers,
acting as a group, most of whom have been in office since February 2003. In 2004, we created a Risk
Management Committee comprised of members of all our business areas to promote an integrated
management of our risk exposures and to establish the main guidelines to be adopted by us to handle
risks related to our activities. As described below, we enter into contracts, such as energy
futures, forwards, swaps and options, designed to hedge against the risk of price changes relating
to our imports and exports. Such derivative commodity instruments are used only to offset market
exposures resulting from these imports and exports, and are not used for trading purposes. The
results of our derivative activities are reviewed by senior management from time to time to permit
the goals and strategies of the program to be periodically adjusted in response to market
conditions.
By using derivative instruments, we expose ourselves to credit and market risk. Credit risk is
the failure of a counter party to perform under the terms of the derivative contract. Market risk
is the adverse effect on the value of a financial instrument that results from a favorable change
in interest rates, currency exchange rates or commodity prices. We address credit risk by
restricting the counterparties to such derivative financial instrument to major financial
institutions. Our executive officers manage market risk.
Commodity Price Risk
Our sales of crude oil and oil products are based on international prices, thus exposing us to
price fluctuations in the international markets.
In order to mitigate the impact of such fluctuations, we have entered into derivative
transactions, primarily futures contracts, options and swaps. Our futures contracts provide
economic hedges for anticipated crude oil purchases and sales, generally forecast to occur within a
30- to 360-day period. Our exposure on these contracts is limited to the difference between
contract value and market value on the volumes hedged.
For 2006, we carried out derivative transactions on 26.4% of our total trade volume, as
compared to 26.8% of our total trade volume for 2005 and 33.1% of our total trade volume for 2004.
This decrease in our derivative transactions is a result of normal fluctuations in our operations.
The open positions on the futures market, compared to spot market value, resulted in recognized
losses of U.S.$1.6 million in 2006, U.S.$0.6 million in 2005 and U.S.$2 million in 2004.
In January of 2001, we sold put options for 52 million barrels of West Texas Intermediate oil
over a period from 2004 to 2007. We executed the transaction in order to protect the quantity of
oil from price fluctuations and provide the institutions financing the Barracuda/Caratinga project
with a minimum guaranteed margin to cover debt servicing. The puts were structured to guarantee a
minimum return on investment for the institutions financing the project. The value of our position
with respect to this put option resulted in no gain or loss at December 31, 2006.
In connection with the long-term contract to buy gas (The Gas Supply Agreement or GSA) to
supply gas-fired power plants and for other uses in Brazil, we entered into a contract, with the
company Empresa Petrolera ANDINA, a gas producer in Bolivia, that constituted a derivative
financial instrument under SFAS 133. This contract, the Natural Gas Price Volatility Reduction
Contract (the PVRC), was executed with the purpose of reducing the effects of price volatility
under the GSA.
The terms of the PVRC included a straight fixed for floating price swap for the period between
inception and 2004, and for the period from 2005 to 2019, a collar with us receiving cash payments
when the calculated price is over the established ceiling and we making cash payments when the
price is below the established floor, with no cash payments being made when the price is between
the ceiling and the floor.
The PVRC was being accounted for under SFAS No. 133 as a derivative instrument, since we did
not satisfy the documentation required for hedge accounting, and was being marked to its calculated
fair value with changes in such value recognized in income. At inception, the PVRC had a positive
value to us of U.S.$169 million, which is deemed a deferred purchase incentive and is being
amortized into income on the basis of the volumes anticipated under the PVRC.
178
As of December 31, 2005, we recorded a derivative asset based on the fair value calculation in
the amount of U.S.$547 million and a liability in the amount of U.S.$144 million, which was deemed
a deferred purchase incentive, which was being amortized into cost of sales on the basis of the
volumes anticipated under the PVRC.
Due to the new Hydrocarbons Law of Bolivia, the other party involved in the PVRC challenged
the contract, alleging among others factors, force majeure and excessive onus. On August 12, 2006,
the parties agreed to cancel the PVRC. As a result, we received the amount of U.S.$41 million from
Andina and wrote off certain account receivables related to the PVRC in the amount of U.S.$77
million.
We also recorded a financial expense related to fair value asset adjustments in the amount of
U.S.$328 million during the first quarter of 2006, due to the effect of recent tax increases in
Bolivia, and U.S.$94 million during the second quarter of 2006 as a consequence of the cancellation
of the contract.
As of May 1, 2006, Supreme Decree 28,701 came into force in Bolivia, through which the natural
hydrocarbon resources in that country were nationalized. As a result, all the petroleum companies
are obliged to deliver all their production to YPFB, which in representation of the State, is the
sole economic agent enabled to commercialize the hydrocarbon products, defining the conditions,
volumes and prices for the domestic market, exports and industrialization. The Decree establishes
that during a 180-day period known as the Transition Period, or until the new operation contracts
come into force, operators of fields with a certified average natural gas production of over 100
million cubic feet per day (as of 2005), as is the case with the San Alberto and San Antonio fields
where we operate, would be required to pay an additional amount to YPFB of 32% over of the
production value, increasing the Bolivian governments interest to a total of 82%. On October 28,
2006, the end of the Transition Period, new operation contracts were executed with YPFB. These new
operation contracts provide or ratify that (i) all hydrocarbon resources are property of YPFB, (ii)
we maintain our status as operator of the oil and gas fields, but sales must be made through YPFB,
and (iii) we have the right to recover our costs and to have a share of the profit generated by the
production. The new operation contracts came in to force in May 2007. As a result of these
requirements, we paid the additional fee to YPFB of 32% on our hydrocarbon production, an amount of
U.S.$144.9 million, between May 2006 and April 2007.
International hedging activities in 2006 represented an average of 284,880 barrels of oil
equivalent per day of physical movements, of which 24.7% was related to fuel oil, 14.9% was related
to diesel, 26.1% was related to gasoline and 31.2% was related to crude oil, as compared to our
international hedging activities in 2005 that represented an average of 255,700 barrels of oil
equivalent per day of physical movements, of which 20.8% was related to fuel oil, 36.8% was related
to gasoline, 15.3% was related to diesel, and 19.8% was related to crude oil. This increase in our
international derivative transactions was a result of normal fluctuations in our operations. Of our
total hedging activities in 2006, 69.4% were carried out by Petrobras, 18.9% by PifCo and 11.7% by
PAI.
The following table sets forth a sensitivity analysis demonstrating the net change in fair
value of a 10% adverse change in the price of the underlying commodity as of December 31, 2006,
which is a 10% increase in the price of the underlying commodity for Options, Futures and Swaps and
a 10% decrease for Options maturing 2007-2008.
179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petrobras |
|
Petrobras America Inc. |
|
PifCo |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
|
|
Fair |
|
+10% |
|
|
Quantity |
|
Value(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Value(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Value (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
Value(1) |
|
Sensitivity |
|
|
(1,000 |
|
(U.S.$ |
|
Quantity |
|
(U.S.$ |
|
Quantity |
|
(U.S.$ |
|
Quantity |
|
(U.S.$ |
|
(U.S.$ |
Maturing in 2006 |
|
bbl) |
|
millions) |
|
(1,000 bbl) |
|
millions) |
|
(1,000 bbl) |
|
millions) |
|
(1,000 bbl) |
|
millions |
|
millions) |
Options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buy contracts |
|
|
0,000 |
|
|
|
0,000 |
|
|
|
0,000 |
|
|
|
0,000 |
|
|
|
0,000 |
|
|
|
0,000 |
|
|
|
0,000 |
|
|
|
0,000 |
|
|
|
0,000 |
|
Sell contracts |
|
|
0,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buy contracts |
|
|
7,464 |
|
|
|
(5,902 |
) |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
0,692 |
|
|
|
4,565 |
|
|
|
0,001 |
|
|
|
12,201 |
|
|
|
(5,209 |
) |
|
|
(4,688 |
) |
Sell contracts |
|
|
4,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receive
variable/ pay
fixed |
|
|
2,754 |
|
|
|
3,340 |
|
|
|
0,000 |
|
|
|
0,000 |
|
|
|
2,164 |
|
|
|
0,246 |
|
|
|
4,918 |
|
|
|
3,586 |
|
|
|
3,227 |
|
Receive fixed/
pay variable |
|
|
5,458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options
maturing
2007-2008(2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sell contracts |
|
|
13000 |
|
|
|
0,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0,000 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Fair value represents an estimate of gain or loss that would be realized if contracts were
settled at the balance sheet date. |
|
(2) |
|
13 million barrels per year. |
Interest Rate and Exchange Rate Risk
The interest rate risk to which we are exposed is a function of our long-term debt and, to a
lesser extent, our short-term debt. Our long-term debt consists principally of notes and borrowings
incurred primarily in connection with capital expenditures and investments in exploration and
development projects and loans to affiliated companies. Approximately 78% of our long-term debt is
denominated in currencies other than reais, principally U.S. dollars, and to a lesser extent,
Japanese Yen and euro-linked European currencies. Our short-term debt consists principally of U.S.
dollar denominated import and export financing and working capital borrowings from commercial
banks. In general, our foreign currency floating rate debt is principally subject to fluctuations
in LIBOR. Our floating rate debt denominated in reais is principally subject to fluctuations in the
Taxa de Juros de Longo Prazo (Brazilian long-term interest rate, or TJLP), as fixed by the National
Monetary Council. See Note 12 to our audited consolidated financial statements.
We currently do not utilize derivative instruments to manage our exposure to interest rate
fluctuation. We have been considering various forms of derivatives to reduce our exposure to
interest rate fluctuations and may utilize these financial instruments in the future.
The exchange rate risk to which we are exposed is limited to the balance sheet and derives
principally from the incidence of non-real denominated obligations in our debt portfolio. In the
event of a depreciation of the real against the foreign currency in which our debt is denominated,
we will incur a monetary loss with respect to such debt. However, a considerable part of our
operating revenue is linked to the U.S. dollar since our oil product prices are based on
international prices, while some expenses are not. See Item 5. Operating and Financial Review and
ProspectsGeneral.
180
The table below provides summary information regarding our exposure to interest rate and
exchange rate risk in our total debt portfolio for 2006 and 2005. Total debt portfolio includes
long-term debt, capital leases, project financings, and current portions thereof, and short-term
debt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt Portfolio |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Real denominated |
|
|
17.9 |
% |
|
|
9.6 |
% |
o/w* fixed rate |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
o/w floating rate |
|
|
17.9 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
Dollar denominated |
|
|
78.1 |
|
|
|
87.3 |
|
o/w fixed rate |
|
|
37.4 |
|
|
|
44.7 |
|
o/w floating rate (includes short-term debt) |
|
|
40.7 |
|
|
|
42.6 |
|
Other currencies (primarily Yen) |
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
o/w fixed rate |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
o/w floating rate |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt Portfolio |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Floating Rate Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real denominated |
|
|
17.8 |
% |
|
|
9.6 |
% |
Foreign Currency Denominated |
|
|
41.2 |
|
|
|
42.9 |
|
Fixed Rated Debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real denominated |
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
Foreign Currency Denominated |
|
|
41.0 |
|
|
|
47.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Debt Portfolio |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
U.S. dollars |
|
|
78.12 |
% |
|
|
87.32 |
% |
Euro |
|
|
1.08 |
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
Japanese Yen |
|
|
2.93 |
|
|
|
2.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazilian reais |
|
|
17.87 |
|
|
|
9.62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
o/w signifies of which |
181
The table below provides information about our total debt obligations as of December 31, 2006,
which are sensitive to changes in interest rates and exchange rates. This table presents, by
expected maturity dates and currency, the principal cash flows and related average interest rates
of these obligations. Variable interest rates are based on the applicable reference rate, LIBOR,
TJLP, IGP-M, CDI (Certificado de Depósito Interbancário, or Interbank Deposit Certificate) as of
December 31, 2006:
(in million of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012-2023 |
|
Total |
|
2006 |
Debt in EURO: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate debt |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
Average
interest rate |
|
|
6.6 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
5.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate
debt |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Average
interest rate |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt in Japanese Yen: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate debt |
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
Average
interest rate |
|
|
2.6 |
% |
|
|
2.4 |
% |
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
2.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate
debt |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Average
interest rate |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt in U.S. dollars: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate debt |
|
|
2,004 |
|
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
606 |
|
|
|
3,455 |
|
|
|
7,978 |
|
|
|
8,751 |
|
Average
interest rate |
|
|
7.5 |
% |
|
|
9.6 |
% |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
7.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate
debt |
|
|
2,146 |
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
1,207 |
|
|
|
988 |
|
|
|
523 |
|
|
|
2,042 |
|
|
|
8,690 |
|
|
|
8,778 |
|
Average
interest rate |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
6.5 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
6.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt in Brazilian |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
reais: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate
debt |
|
|
1,424 |
|
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
983 |
|
|
|
3,813 |
|
|
|
4,134 |
|
Average
interest rate |
|
|
11.4 |
% |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
10.8 |
% |
|
|
13.8 |
% |
|
|
11.7 |
% |
|
|
12.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
obligations |
|
|
5,812 |
|
|
|
2,967 |
|
|
|
2,018 |
|
|
|
2,392 |
|
|
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
6,850 |
|
|
|
21,338 |
|
|
|
22,534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We remain in one of the three zero-cost foreign exchange collar (combined put and call
options) transactions that we entered into in 2000. The purpose of this outstanding transaction is
to reduce our exposure to variations between the U.S. dollar and Euro exchange rate. This collar
establishes a ceiling and a floor for the associated exchange rate. If the exchange rate falls
below the defined floor, we will pay the counterparty the difference between the actual rate and
the floor rate on the notional amount. Conversely, if the exchange rate increases above the defined
ceiling, the counterparty will pay us the difference between the actual rate and the ceiling rate
on the notional amount. We do not account for these derivative contracts as hedge derivative
instruments.
182
The table below provides information about our remaining zero-cost foreign exchange collar.
The table presents the notional amount of the related debt obligation, the floor and ceiling rates,
the fair values of the put and call options and the expiration date of the contract.
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount of debt (U.S.$ in millions) |
|
|
177.2 |
|
Contractual rates(EUR/USD) |
|
|
|
|
Interest payments |
|
|
|
|
Floor |
|
|
0.94 |
|
Ceiling |
|
|
1.18 |
|
Final principal payments |
|
|
|
|
Floor |
|
|
1.0725 |
|
Ceiling |
|
|
1.1800 |
|
Fair value as of December 31, 2006 (U.S.$ in millions) |
|
|
|
|
Put Option |
|
|
(0.001 |
) |
Call Option |
|
|
21.29 |
|
Expiration date |
|
|
2007 |
|
PifCo
PifCo makes limited use of derivatives, which are contracted by Petrobras on behalf of PifCo.
PifCo does not hold derivative instruments for trading purposes or for leverage.
At September 12, 2006, PifCo entered into cross currency swap in which it swaps principal and
interest payments on Yen-denominated bonds for U.S. dollar amounts. Under U.S. GAAP, foreign
currency cash flow hedges can only be designated as such when hedging the risk to the entitys
functional currency, and therefore, this cross currency swaps is qualified for a hedge accounting
designation, taking into account that PifCos functional currency is the U.S. dollar, and the
assessment of hedge effectiveness indicates that the change in fair value of the designated hedging
instrument is highly effective.
The hedge item is a ¥ 35 billion bond, with a ten-year maturity, carrying a semi-annual coupon
of 2.15% per year. The hedge instrument is a cross-currency swap, with a ten year maturity, under
which U.S. dollars are paid and Japanese Yen are received according to the obligations of the bond.
The effectiveness test was made at the inception of the hedge based on the hypothetical derivative
method. The effectiveness test will be made on an ongoing basis every three months.
The transaction gain or loss arising from the remeasurement of Yen-denominated bonds would be
offset by a related amount reclassified each period from other comprehensive income to earnings.
The cross currency swap at December 31, 2006 has a negative fair value of U.S.$9 million due to the
devaluation of the Japanese Yen as compared to the U.S. dollar since the inception of the
instrument. In the normal course of business, PifCo faces market risks, including interest rate
risk and oil and oil products price risk. Neither we nor PifCo have entered into derivative
contracts or made other arrangements to hedge against interest rate risk. PifCo has historically
passed on its financing costs to us by selling crude oil and oil products to us at a premium to
compensate for its financing costs. Although we are considering methods of continuing this practice
in the future, we cannot assure you that this practice will continue.
PifCos short-term debt borrowings are derived mainly from commercial banks and include trade
lines of credit and commercial paper, which are primarily intended for the purchase of crude oil
and oil products, and with interest rates ranging from 5.52% to 8.06%. The weighted average annual
interest rate for PifCos short-term debt at December 31, 2006 was 6.76%, compared to 5.02% at
December 31, 2005.
The table below sets forth the amounts and related weighted average annual interest rates by
expected maturity dates for PifCos long-term debt obligations at December 31, 2006:
183
CALENDAR YEAR OF EXPECTED MATURITY DATE FOR DEBT
(in thousands of U.S. dollars, except for percentages)
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 31, |
Debt Obligations |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2013-2018 |
|
Total |
|
2006 |
Debt in U.S. Dollars: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate debt |
|
|
441,698 |
|
|
|
67,718 |
|
|
|
68,738 |
|
|
|
356,164 |
|
|
|
70,928 |
|
|
|
2,299,669 |
|
|
|
3,304,915 |
|
|
|
3,679,951 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Variable rate debt |
|
|
329,500 |
|
|
|
149,500 |
|
|
|
259,500 |
|
|
|
20,500 |
|
|
|
22,250 |
|
|
|
260,000 |
|
|
|
1,041,250 |
|
|
|
1,074,014 |
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
6.9 |
% |
|
|
7.3 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
7.8 |
% |
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt in Japanese Yen: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293,969 |
|
|
|
293,969 |
|
|
|
293,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average interest rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt obligations |
|
|
771,198 |
|
|
|
217,218 |
|
|
|
328,238 |
|
|
|
376,664 |
|
|
|
93,178 |
|
|
|
2,853,638 |
|
|
|
4,640,134 |
|
|
|
5,047,634 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
December 31, |
Total Debt Portfolio |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
U.S. Dollars: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate debt |
|
|
74.5 |
% |
|
|
79.8 |
% |
Floating rate debt |
|
|
20.5 |
% |
|
|
20.2 |
% |
Japanese Yen: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate debt |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Floating rate debt |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Total debt portfolio |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006, 20% of PifCos debt was dollar-denominated floating rate debt and 75% of
PifCos debt was dollar-denominated fixed rate debt. Since 95% of PifCos debt is dollar
denominated, it is not subject to material foreign exchange rate risk.
ITEM 12. DESCRIPTION OF SECURITIES OTHER THAN EQUITY SECURITIES
Not Applicable.
ITEM 13. DEFAULTS, DIVIDEND ARREARAGES AND DELINQUENCIES
None.
ITEM 14. MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS TO THE RIGHTS OF SECURITY HOLDERS AND USE
OF PROCEEDS
None.
ITEM 15. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Both PifCo and we have evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December
31, 2006. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls
and procedures, including the
possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures.
Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable
assurance of achieving their control objectives. Based upon our evaluation, our chief executive
officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of
December 31, 2006 were effective to provide reasonable assurance that
184
information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the applicable rules and
forms, and that it is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive
officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Managements Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The managements of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. PETROBRAS and subsidiaries and Petrobras
International Finance Company PifCo and subsidiaries (each, a Company) are responsible for
establishing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for their
assessments of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
Each Companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under
the supervision of, each Companys Audit Committee, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial
Officer and effected by each Companys board of directors, management, and other personnel to
provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation
of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States. Each Companys internal control over financial reporting
includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in
reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of
the Company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made
only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or
disposition of the Companys assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial
statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent
or detect misstatements on a timely basis. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective
can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to consolidated financial statements preparation
and presentation. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management assessed the effectiveness of each Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on the criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations COSO of the Treadway
Commission. Based on that assessment, management has concluded that as of December 31, 2006 each
Companys internal control over financial reporting is effective.
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of each Companys internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006 has been audited by KPMG Auditores Independentes, the Companies
independent registered public accounting firm, which opinion is stated in their report, dated April
5, 2007, included in the financial statements to this Annual Report.
There were no significant changes in our internal controls or the internal controls of PifCo
or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls during the entire year of 2006
and subsequent to the date of managements evaluations.
185
Integrated Internal Control Systems and Methods ProgramPrisma
The Integrated Internal Control Systems and Methods Program, Prisma, part of our strategic
agenda and currently overseen by the Companys General Internal Control Management Office, has
concluded its work to meet the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.
Prismas activities in 2006 were carried out with the guidance of the Internal Control
Management Committee and monitored by the Audit Committee. These activities included the mapping,
documentation, and maintenance of the internal control structure in order to mitigate any risks
associated with our system of consolidated financial reports. Our General Internal Control
Management Office continued to implement the best corporate governance and control practices with
respect to all aspects of our business, services, financial and information technology sectors,
according to the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), as well as the Control Objectives for Information
and Related Technology (COBIT).
We have approved the design of the processes and controls that would impact the consolidated
financial statements. Any weaknesses that could potentially undermine the certification of our
internal controls were eliminated. The systems internal audits, organized by the Board of
Directors, applied new control effectiveness tests. The tests indicated no deficiencies or
weaknesses that could compromise our judgment regarding our control structure, either at particular
entities or relating to our processes and information technology, more broadly.
The background documentation of our designs of the processes, controls, and effectiveness
tests is saved regularly in an integrated internal control management system which automatically
monitors the flow of paper and responsibility, and enables all levels of management to sign off on
the internal control structure, including the Financial Director and President. Any managers, the
General Internal Control Management Office, Internal Audits, Senior Management, and the Audit
Committee, can view the updated status of our systems internal controls at any time.
ITEM 16A. AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
On June 17, 2005 our Board of Directors approved the appointment of an audit committee for
purposes of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Our Board of Directors has determined that Fabio
Colletti Barbosa is the audit committee financial expert, and he is independent, as defined in 17
CRF 240.10A-3. PifCos board of directors currently serves as its audit committee for purposes of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. PifCos board of directors has determined that Marcos Antonio Silva
Menezes is an audit committee financial expert within the meaning of this Item 16A. Mr. Menezes
is not independent as defined in 17 CRF 240.10A-3.
ITEM 16B. CODE OF ETHICS
We have adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to our employees and executive officers and a Code
of Good Practices applicable to our directors and executive officers, both of which are also
applicable to PifCo. In 2006, we revised and updated our Code of Ethics. No waivers of the
provisions of the Code of Ethics or Code of Good Practices are permitted. Both documents are
available on our website: www.petrobras.com.br/investor relations/corporategovernance.
186
ITEM 16C. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Principal Accountant Fees
Audit and Non-Audit Fees
Petrobras
The following table sets forth the fees billed to us by our independent auditors, KPMG
Auditores Independentes, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and Ernst & Young
Auditores Independentes S/S, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(in thousand of reais) |
Audit fees |
|
|
17,254 |
|
|
|
10,876 |
|
|
Audit-related fees |
|
|
3,939 |
|
|
|
3,441 |
|
Tax fees |
|
|
1,467 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fees |
|
|
22,660 |
|
|
|
14,901 |
|
Audit fees in the above table are the aggregate fees billed by KPMG Auditores
Independentes and Ernst & Young Auditores Independentes S/S in connection with the audit of our
annual financial statements (U.S. GAAP and Brazilian GAAP), interim reviews (U.S. GAAP and
Brazilian GAAP), subsidiary audits (U.S. GAAP and Brazilian GAAP, among others) and review of
periodic documents filed with the SEC. In 2006, Audit fees include the aggregate fees billed by
KPMG Auditores Independentes, in the amount of R$2,063 thousand, related to the audit of the
internal controls. Audit-related fees in the above table are the aggregate fees billed by KPMG
Auditores Independentes and Ernst & Young Auditores Independentes S/S for assurance and related
services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or reviews of our financial
statements and are not reported under Audit fees nor under Audit fees related to SOX.
Tax fees in the above table are fees billed by KPMG Auditores Independentes and Ernst & Young
Auditores Independentes S/S for services related to tax compliance reviews of the annual federal
tax return and procedures with respect to income and sales taxes.
PifCo
The following table sets forth the fees billed to PifCo by its independent auditors KPMG
Auditores Independentes, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, and Ernst & Young
Auditores Independentes S/S, during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(in thousand of reais) |
Audit fees |
|
|
252.8 |
|
|
|
318.3 |
|
Audit-related fees |
|
|
39.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fees |
|
|
292.6 |
|
|
|
318.3 |
|
Audit Fees are the aggregate fees billed by KPMG Auditores Independentes and Ernst &
Young Auditores Independentes S/S for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to
the performance of the audit or reviews of PifCo financial statements and are not reported under
Audit fees. Fees disclosed under the category Audit-Related Fees are mainly related to services
provided in connection with the issuance of PifCos notes in the international capital markets and
its exports prepayment program.
187
Audit Committee Approval Policies and Procedures
Our audit committee has the authority to recommend pre-approval policies and procedures to our
Board of Directors for the engagement of our or PifCos independent auditor for services. At
present, our Board of Directors has not established such pre-approval policies and procedures. Our
Board of Directors expressly approves on a case-by-case basis any engagement of our independent
auditors for all services provided to our subsidiaries or to us. Our bylaws prohibit our
independent auditor from providing any consulting services to our subsidiaries or to us during the
term of such auditors contract.
ITEM 16D. EXEMPTIONS FROM THE LISTING STANDARDS FOR AUDIT COMMITTEES
Under the listed company audit committee rules of the NYSE and the SEC, we must comply with
Exchange Act Rule 10A-3, which requires that we establish an audit committee composed of members of
the Board of Directors that meets specified requirements. In reliance on the exemption in Rule
10A-3(b)(iv)(E), we have designated two members to our audit committee, Francisco Roberto de
Albuquerque and Arthur Antônio Sendas, who are designees of the Brazilian government, which is one
of our affiliates. In our assessment, these members acts independently in performing the
responsibilities of an audit committee member under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and satisfy the other
requirements of Exchange Act Rule 10A-3.
ITEM 16E. PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS
Petrobras
During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, neither any affiliated purchaser, as defined
in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Securities Exchange Act, nor we have purchased any of our equity
securities. On December 15, 2006, we approved a share repurchase program and we may repurchase
shares during 2007.
ITEM 17. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Not applicable.
ITEM 18. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
See pages F-1 through F-170, incorporated herein by reference.
188
ITEM 19. EXHIBITS
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
Amended By-Laws of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.-Petrobras (together with an English
version) (incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Petróleo
Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 30, 2004 (File No. 1-15106)). |
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
Memorandum and Articles of Association of Petrobras International Finance Company
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of
Petrobras International Finance Company, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on July 1, 2002, and amendments to which were filed on December 13, 2002
and March 20, 2003 (File No. 333-14168)). PifCos Memorandum and Articles of
Association were last amended on May 7, 2007. PifCos Registered Office is
currently working with the Companys Registrar in the Cayman Islands to file
PifCos new Amended Memorandum and Articles of Association that reflect the
following changes: a) a total capital contribution in the amount of
U.S.$300,050,000.00; b) the resulting new number of 300,050,000 shares, with the
par value of U.S.$1.00; and c) wider objects through which the company plans to
carry out its business in the near future. |
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
Deposit Agreement dated as of July 14, 2000, among Petrobras and Citibank, N.A., as
depositary, and registered holders and beneficial owners from time to time of the
American Depositary Shares, representing the common shares of Petrobras
(incorporated by reference to exhibit of Petrobras Registration Statement on Form
F-6 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 17, 2000 (File No.
333-123000)). |
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
Amended and Restated Deposit Agreement dated as of February 21, 2001, among
Petrobras and Citibank, N.A., as depositary, and the registered holders and
beneficial owners from time to time of the American Depositary Shares, representing
the preferred shares of Petrobras (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.1 of
Amendment No. 1 to Petrobras Registration Statement on Form F-1 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on July 3, 2001 (File No. 333-13660)). |
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated as of March 23, 2001, to the Amended and Restated Deposit
Agreement, dated as of February 21, 2001, among Petrobras, Citibank N.A., as
depositary, and the registered holders and beneficial owners from time to time of
the American Depositary Shares representing the preferred shares of Petrobras
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Amendment No. 1 to Petrobras
Registration Statement on Form F-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on July 3, 2001 (File No. 333-13660)). |
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
Indenture, dated as of July 19, 2002, between Petrobras and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as
Trustee (incorporated by reference to exhibit 4.4 of the Registration Statement of
Petrobras International Finance Company and Petrobras on Form F-3, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on July 5, 2002, and amendments to which were
filed on July 19, 2002 and August 14, 2002 (File No. 333-92044-01)). |
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
Indenture, dated as of July 19, 2002, between Petrobras International Finance
Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to exhibit
4.5 of the Registration Statement of Petrobras International Finance Company and
Petrobras on Form F-3, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 5,
2002, and amendments to which were filed on July 19, 2002 and August 14, 2002 (File
No. 333-92044-01)). |
|
|
|
2.6
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 31, 2003, between Petrobras
International Finance Company (PifCo) and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee, relating
to the 9.00% Global Step-Up Notes due 2008 (incorporated by reference to exhibit
2.6 of Petrobras annual report on Form 20-F for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2002, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 19, 2002 (File No.
1-15106)). |
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 2, 2003, between Petrobras
International Finance Company (PifCo) and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee, relating
to the 9.125% Global Notes due 2013 (incorporated by reference to the Annual Report
on Form 20-F of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on June 30, 2004 (File No. 1-15106)). |
|
|
|
2.8
|
|
Amended and Restated Second Supplemental Indenture, initially dated as of July 2,
2003, as amended and restated as of September 18, 2003, between Petrobras
International Finance Company (PifCo) and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee, relating
to the 9.125% Global Notes due 2013 (incorporated by reference to the Annual Report
on Form 20-F of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on June 30, 2004 (File No. 1-15106)). |
189
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of December 10, 2003, between Petrobras
International Finance Company (PifCo) and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee, relating
to the 8.375% Global Notes due 2018 (incorporated by reference to the Annual Report
on Form 20-F of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on June 30, 2004 (File No. 1-15106)). |
|
|
|
2.10
|
|
2.10-Indenture, dated as of May 9, 2001, between Petrobras International Finance
Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, relating to the 9 7/8%
Senior Notes due 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration
Statement of Petrobras International Finance Company and Petróleo Brasileiro
S.A.Petrobras on Form F-4, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 6, 2001 (File No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.11
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 26, 2001, between Petrobras
International Finance Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, relating to the
9 7/8% Senior Notes due 2008 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2
to the Registration Statement of Petrobras International Finance Company and
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras on Form F-4, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 6, 2001 (File No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.12
|
|
Indenture, dated as of July 6, 2001, between Petrobras International Finance
Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, relating to the 9 3/4% Senior Notes due
2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registration Statement of
Petrobras International Finance Company and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras on
Form F-4, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 6, 2001
(File No. 333-14170)). |
|
|
|
2.13
|
|
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 26, 2001, between Petrobras
International Finance Company and The Bank of New York, as Trustee, relating to the
9 3/4% Senior Notes due 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the
Registration Statement of Petrobras International Finance Company and Petróleo
Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras on Form F-4, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 6, 2001 (File No. 333-14170)). |
|
|
|
2.14
|
|
Indenture, initially dated as of February 4, 2002, as amended and restated as of
February 28, 2002, between Petrobras International Finance Company and The Bank of
New York, as Trustee, relating to the 9 1/8% Senior Notes due 2007
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.19 to the amended Annual Report on Form
20-F of Petrobras International Finance Company, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 13, 2002 (File No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.15
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of May 9, 2001, among Petrobras
International Finance Company, Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras, and USB Warburg
LLC, Banc of America Securities LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., RBC Dominion
Securities Corporation and Santander Central Hispano Investment Securities Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registration Statement of
Petrobras International Finance Company and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras on
Form F-4 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 6, 2001
(File No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.16
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, dated as of July 6, 2001, among Petrobras
International Finance Company, Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras, and USB Warburg
LLC, Banc of America Securities LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., RBC Dominion
Securities Corporation and Santander Central Hispano Investment Securities Inc.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to the Registration Statement of
Petrobras International Finance Company and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras on
Form F-4, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 6, 2001
(File No. 333-14170)). |
|
|
|
2.17
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement, initially dated as of February 4, 2002, as amended
and restated as of February 28, 2002, among Petrobras International Finance
Company, Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras, UBS Warburg LLC and Morgan Stanley &
Co. Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.20 to the amended Annual
Report on Form 20-F of Petrobras International Finance Company, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on December 13, 2002 (File No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.18
|
|
Standby Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 9, 2001, between Petróleo Brasileiro
S.A.Petrobras and The Bank of New York (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5
to the Registration Statement of Petrobras International Finance Company and
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras on Form F-4, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 6, 2001 (File No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.19
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to the Standby Purchase Agreement, dated as of November 26, 2001,
between Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras and The Bank of New York, as Trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to the Registration Statement of
Petrobras International Finance Company and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras on
Form F-4, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 6, 2001
(File No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.20
|
|
Standby Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 6, 2001, between Petróleo Brasileiro
S.A.Petrobras and The Bank of New York (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.5
to the Registration Statement of Petrobras International Finance |
190
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
Company and
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras on Form F-4, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on December 6, 2001 (File No. 333-14170)). |
|
|
|
2.21
|
|
Standby Purchase Agreement, initially dated as of February 4, 2002, as amended and
restated as of February 28, 2002, between Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras and
The Bank of New York, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.21 to the
amended Annual Report on Form 20-F of Petrobras International Finance Company,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 13, 2002 (File No.
333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.22
|
|
Standby Purchase Agreement dated as of March 31, 2003, between Petróleo Brasileiro
S.A.Petrobras and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.15 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Petrobras International Finance
Company, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 19, 2003 (File
No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.23
|
|
Standby Purchase Agreement dated as of July 2, 2003, between Petróleo Brasileiro
S.A.Petrobras and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to
the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Petrobras International Finance Company, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2004 and amendment filed on
July 26, 2004 (File No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.24
|
|
Amended and Restated Standby Purchase Agreement initially dated as of July 2, 2003,
as amended and restated as of September 18, 2003, between Petróleo Brasileiro
S.A.Petrobras and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to
the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Petrobras International Finance Company, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2004 and amendment filed on
July 26, 2004 (File No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.25
|
|
Standby Purchase Agreement dated as of December 10, 2003, between Petróleo
Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Petrobras International Finance
Company, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2004 and
amendment filed on July 26, 2004 (File No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.26
|
|
Notes Purchase Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2002, between Petrobras
International Finance Company and UBS Warburg LLC and Morgan Stanley & Co.
Incorporated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.13 to the Annual Report on
Form 20-F of Petrobras International Finance Company, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on July 1, 2002, and amendments to which were filed on December
13, 2002 and March 20, 2003 (File No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.27
|
|
Master Export Contract, dated as of December 21, 2001, between Petróleo Brasileiro
S.A.Petrobras and Petrobras Finance Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
2.14 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Petrobras International Finance Company,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 1, 2002, and amendments
to which were filed on December 13, 2002 and March 20, 2003 (File No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.28
|
|
Amendment to the Master Export Contract, dated as of May 21, 2003, among Petróleo
Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras and Petrobras Finance Ltd. (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.18 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Petrobras International Finance
Company, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 19, 2003 (File
No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.29
|
|
Depositary Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2001, among U.S. Bank, National
Association, Cayman Islands Branch, in capacity as Trustee of the PF Export
Receivables Master Trust, Citibank, N.A., in capacity as Securities Intermediary,
and Petrobras Finance Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.15 to the Annual
Report on Form 20-F of Petrobras International Finance Company, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on July 1, 2002, and amendments to which were
filed on December 13, 2002 and March 20, 2003 (File No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.30
|
|
Letter Agreement relating to the Depositary Agreement, dated as of May 16, 2003
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.20 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of
Petrobras International Finance Company, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on June 19, 2003 (File No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.31
|
|
Administrative Services Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2001, between Petróleo
Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras, as Delivery and Sales Agent, and Petrobras Finance Ltd.
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.16 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of
Petrobras International Finance Company, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on July 1, 2002, and amendments to which were filed on December 13, 2002
and March 20, 2003 (File No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.32
|
|
Letter Agreement relating to the Administrative Services Agreement, dated as of May
16, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.22 to the Annual Report on Form
20-F of Petrobras International Finance Company, filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on June 19, 2003 (File No. 333-14168)). |
191
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
2.33
|
|
Amended and Restated Trust Deed, dated as of December 21, 2001, among U.S. Bank,
National Association, Cayman Islands Branch, in capacity as Trustee of the PF
Export Receivables Master Trust, Citibank, N.A., in capacity as Paying Agent,
Transfer Agent, Registrar and Depositary Bank, and Petrobras International Finance
Company, as Servicer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.17 to the Annual
Report on Form 20-F of Petrobras International Finance Company, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on July 1, 2002, and amendments to which were
filed on December 13, 2002 and March 20, 2003 (File No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.34
|
|
Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2001, among Petrobras
Finance Ltd., Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras and U.S. Bank, National
Association, Cayman Islands Branch, solely in capacity as Trustee of the PF Export
Receivables Master Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.18 to the Annual
Report on Form 20-F of Petrobras International Finance Company, filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on July 1, 2002, and amendments to which were
filed on December 13, 2002 and March 20, 2003 (File No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.35
|
|
Amended and Restated Receivables Purchase Agreement, dated as of May 21, 2003,
among Petrobras Finance Ltd., Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras and U.S. Bank,
National Association, Cayman Islands Branch, solely in capacity as Trustee of the
PF Export Receivables Master Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.25 to
the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Petrobras International Finance Company, filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 19, 2003 (File No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.36
|
|
Prepayment Agreement, dated as of December 21, 2001, between Petróleo Brasileiro
S.A.Petrobras and Petrobras Finance Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
2.26 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Petrobras International Finance Company,
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 19, 2003 (File No.
333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.37
|
|
Amended and Restated Prepayment Agreement, dated as of May 2, 2003, between
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras and Petrobras Finance Ltd. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.27 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Petrobras
International Finance Company, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
June 19, 2003 (File No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.38
|
|
Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 15, 2004, between Petrobras
International Finance Company (PifCo) and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee, and
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras relating to the 7.75% Global Notes due 2014
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.38 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of
Petrobras and Petrobras International Finance Company, filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2005 (File No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
Standby Purchase Agreement dated as of September 15, 2004, between Petróleo
Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.39 to the Annual Report on Form 20-F of Petrobras and
Petrobras International Finance Company, filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on June 30, 2005 (File No. 333-14168)). |
|
|
|
2.40
|
|
Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of October 6, 2006, between Petrobras
International Finance Company (PifCo) and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee, and
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras relating to the 6.125% Global Notes due 2016. |
|
|
|
2.41
|
|
Standby Purchase Agreement dated as of October 6, 2006, between Petróleo Brasileiro
S.A.Petrobras and JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee. |
|
|
|
2.42
|
|
Amended and Restated Fifth Supplemental Indenture, initially dated as of October 6,
2006, as amended and restated as of February 7, 2007, between Petrobras
International Finance Company (PifCo) and the Bank of New York, as successor to
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Trustee, and Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras
relating to the 6.125% Global Notes due 2016. |
|
|
|
2.43
|
|
Standby Purchase Agreement, initially dated as of October 6, 2006, as amended and
restated as of February 7, 2007, between Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.Petrobras and the
Bank of New York, as successor to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Trustee. |
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of long-term debt securities of Petrobras authorized under any given
instrument does not exceed 10% of its total assets on a consolidated basis.
Petrobras hereby agrees to furnish to the SEC, upon its request, a copy of any
instrument defining the rights of holders of its long-term debt or of its
subsidiaries for which consolidated or unconsolidated financial statements are
required to be filed. |
|
|
|
4.1
|
|
Form of Concession Agreement for Exploration, Development and Production of crude
oil and natural gas executed |
192
|
|
|
No. |
|
Description |
|
|
|
|
|
between Petrobras and ANP (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10.1 of Petrobras Registration Statement on Form F-1 filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on July 14, 2000 (File No. 333-12298)). |
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement of natural gas, executed between Petrobras and
Yacimientos Petroliferos Fiscales Bolivianos-YPFB (together with and English
version) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Petrobras Registration
Statement on Form F-1 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 14,
2000 (File No. 333-12298)). |
|
|
|
8.1
|
|
List of subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Consent letter of DeGolyer and MacNaughton. |
|
|
|
12.1
|
|
Petrobras Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
PifCos Certifications Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
13.1
|
|
Petrobras Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
13.2
|
|
PifCos Certifications Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
193
GLOSSARY OF PETROLEUM INDUSTRY TERMS
Unless the context indicates otherwise, the following terms have the meanings shown below:
|
|
|
barrels or bbls
|
|
Barrels of crude oil. |
|
|
|
catalytic cracking
|
|
A process by which hydrocarbon molecules are broken
down (cracked) into lighter fractions by the action
of a catalyst. |
|
|
|
cmpd
|
|
Cubic meters per day |
|
|
|
condensate
|
|
Light hydrocarbon substances produced with natural
gas, which condense into liquid at normal
temperatures and pressures, associated with surface
production equipment. |
|
|
|
crude oil
|
|
Crude oil, including NGLs. |
|
|
|
distillation
|
|
A process by which liquids are separated or refined
by vaporization followed by condensation. |
|
|
|
heavy crude oil
|
|
Crude oil with API density less than or equal to 27°. |
|
|
|
light crude oil
|
|
Crude oil with API density higher than 27°. |
|
|
|
LPG
|
|
Liquefied petroleum gas, which is a mixture of
saturated and unsaturated hydrocarbons, with up to
five carbon atoms, used as domestic fuel. |
|
|
|
NGLs
|
|
Natural gas liquids, which are light hydrocarbon
substances produced with natural gas, which condense
into liquid at normal temperatures and pressures. |
|
|
|
Proved reserves
|
|
Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated
quantities of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas
liquids which geological and engineering data
demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be
recoverable in future years from known reservoirs
under existing economic and operating conditions,
i.e., prices and costs as of the date the estimate
is made. Prices include consideration of changes in
existing prices provided only by contractual
arrangements, but not on escalations based upon
future conditions. |
|
|
|
Proved developed
reserves
|
|
Proved developed reserves are reserves that can be
expected to be recovered through existing wells with
existing equipment and operating methods. Additional
oil and gas expected to be obtained through the
application of fluid injection or other improved
recovery techniques for supplementing the natural
forces and mechanisms of primary recovery are
included as proved developed reserves only after
testing by a pilot project or after the operation of
an installed program has confirmed through
production response that increased recovery will be
achieved. |
|
|
|
Proved undeveloped
reserves
|
|
Proved undeveloped reserves are reserves that are
expected to be recovered from new wells on undrilled
acreage, or from existing wells where a relatively
major expenditure is required for recompletion, but
does not include reserves attributable to any
acreage for which an application of fluid injection
or other improved recovery technique is
contemplated, unless such techniques have been
proved effective by actual tests in the area and in
the same reservoir. Reserves on undrilled acreage
are limited to those drilling units offsetting
productive units that are reasonably certain of
production when drilled. Proved reserves for other
undrilled units are claimed only where it is
demonstrated with certainty that there is continuity
of production from the existing productive
formation. |
194
ABBREVIATIONS
|
|
|
Bbl
|
|
Barrel |
Bcf
|
|
Billion cubic feet |
Boe
|
|
Barrels of oil equivalent |
Bpd
|
|
Barrels per day |
Cf
|
|
Cubic feet |
Km
|
|
Kilometer |
Km2
|
|
Square kilometers |
Mbbl
|
|
Thousand barrels |
Mboe
|
|
Thousand barrels of oil equivalent |
Mbpd
|
|
Thousand barrels per day |
Mcf
|
|
Thousand cubic feet |
MMbbl
|
|
Million barrels |
MMboe
|
|
Million barrels of oil equivalent |
MMbtu
|
|
Million British thermal units |
MMcf
|
|
Million cubic feet |
MMcmd
|
|
Million cubic meters per day |
MMcfpd
|
|
Million cubic feet per day |
MMscfd
|
|
Million standard cubic feet per day |
MW
|
|
Megawatts |
m3
|
|
Cubic meters |
P$
|
|
Argentine pesos |
R$
|
|
Brazilian reais |
U.S.$
|
|
the United States dollars |
CONVERSION TABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 barrel
|
|
=
|
|
42 U.S. gallons |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 domestic barrel of oil equivalent
|
|
=
|
|
1 barrel of crude oil
|
|
=
|
|
5,614.4 cubic feet of natural
gas through December 31, 1999
and 6,000 cubic feet of natural
gas as of December 31, 2000. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 international barrel of oil equivalent
|
|
=
|
|
1 barrel of crude oil
|
|
=
|
|
6,000.0 cubic feet of natural gas |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 cubic meter of natural gas
|
|
=
|
|
35.314 cubic feet
|
|
=
|
|
0.0063 barrels of oil equivalent |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Km
|
|
=
|
|
0.625 miles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 acre
|
|
=
|
|
0.004047 km 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Km2
|
|
=
|
|
247.1 acres |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 ton of crude oil
|
|
=
|
|
1 metric ton (1,000
kilograms of crude
oil)
|
|
=
|
|
Approximately 7.5 barrels of
crude oil (assuming an
atmospheric pressure index
gravity of 37° API) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 meter
|
|
=
|
|
3.2808 feet |
|
|
|
|
195
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant hereby certifies that it meets all the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly
caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized,
in the City of Rio de Janeiro, on June 25, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. PETROBRAS
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ JOSÉ SÉRGIO GABRIELLI DE AZEVEDO
|
|
|
|
Name: |
José Sérgio Gabrielli de Azevedo |
|
|
|
Title: |
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ ALMIR GUILHERME BARBASSA
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Almir Guilherme Barbassa |
|
|
|
Title: |
Chief Financial Officer |
|
196
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant hereby certifies that it meets all the requirements for filing on Form 20-F and has duly
caused this annual report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized,
in the City of Rio de Janeiro, on June 25, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petrobras International Finance Company PifCo
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ DANIEL LIMA DE OLIVEIRA
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Daniel Lima de Oliveira |
|
|
|
Title: |
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
/s/ SÉRVIO TÚLIO DA ROSA TINOCO
|
|
|
|
Name: |
Sérvio Túlio da Rosa Tinoco |
|
|
|
Title: |
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
197
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. Petrobras and subsidiaries
Consolidated Financial Statements
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
with Report of Independent
Registered Public Accounting Firm
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-1 |
|
|
|
|
F-3 |
|
|
|
|
F-5 |
|
|
|
|
F-7 |
|
|
|
|
F-9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-11 |
|
|
|
|
F-12 |
|
|
|
|
F-25 |
|
|
|
|
F-29 |
|
|
|
|
F-30 |
|
|
|
|
F-31 |
|
|
|
|
F-32 |
|
|
|
|
F-33 |
|
|
|
|
F-34 |
|
|
|
|
F-41 |
|
|
|
|
F-43 |
|
|
|
|
F-44 |
|
|
|
|
F-53 |
|
|
|
|
F-54 |
|
|
|
|
F-59 |
|
|
|
|
F-60 |
|
|
|
|
F-75 |
|
|
|
|
F-83 |
|
|
|
|
F-91 |
|
|
|
|
F-107 |
|
|
|
|
F-112 |
|
|
|
|
F-113 |
|
|
|
|
F-114 |
|
|
|
|
F-126 |
|
|
|
|
F-128 |
|
|
|
|
F-132 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-138 |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Executive Board and Shareholder of
Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. Petrobras
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A.
Petrobras (and subsidiaries) as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements
of income, shareholders equity and comprehensive income, and cash flows for the year then
ended. We also have audited managements assessment, included in the accompanying
Managements Report on the Internal Control over Financial Reporting, that Petróleo Brasileiro
S.A. Petrobras (and subsidiaries) maintained effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal Control -
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. Petrobras management is responsible for these
consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements, an opinion on managements assessment, and an opinion on the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. The accompanying
consolidated balance sheet of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. Petrobras as of December 31, 2005 and
the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders equity and cash flows for each of
the years ended December 31, 2005 and 2004, were audited by other auditors whose report
thereon dated February 17, 2006, expressed an unqualified opinion on those statements.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit of financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining
an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment,
testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
F-1
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. Petrobras as of December
31, 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, managements
assessment that Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. Petrobras maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on
criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Furthermore, in our opinion, Petróleo Brasileiro
S.A. Petrobras maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal ControlIntegrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
As discussed in the Note 2(k) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted the
recognition and disclosure provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, as of December
31, 2006.
KPMG Auditores Independentes
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
April 5, 2007
F-2
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, 2006 and 2005
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 4) |
|
|
12,688 |
|
|
|
9,871 |
|
Marketable securities (Note 5) |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
Accounts receivable, net (Note 6) |
|
|
6,311 |
|
|
|
6,184 |
|
Inventories (Note 7) |
|
|
6,573 |
|
|
|
5,305 |
|
Deferred income taxes (Note 3) |
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
Recoverable taxes (Note 8) |
|
|
2,593 |
|
|
|
2,087 |
|
Advances to suppliers |
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
652 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
843 |
|
|
|
750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,955 |
|
|
|
25,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net (Note 9) |
|
|
58,897 |
|
|
|
45,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in non-consolidated companies and other investments (Note 10) |
|
|
3,262 |
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net (Note 6) |
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
642 |
|
Advances to suppliers |
|
|
852 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
Petroleum and alcohol account receivable
from Federal Government (Note 11) |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
Government securities |
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
364 |
|
Marketable securities (Note 5) |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
Restricted deposits for legal proceedings and guarantees (Note 19 (a)) |
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
Recoverable taxes (Note 8) |
|
|
1,292 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
Deferred income taxes (Note 3) |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Goodwill (Note 18) |
|
|
243 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
Inventories (Note 7) |
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
Fair value asset of gas hedge (Note 20) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
547 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,566 |
|
|
|
5,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
98,680 |
|
|
|
78,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-3
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)
December 31, 2006 and 2005
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
|
5,418 |
|
|
|
3,838 |
|
Short-term debt (Note 12) |
|
|
1,293 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 12) |
|
|
2,106 |
|
|
|
1,428 |
|
Current portion of project financings (Note 14) |
|
|
2,182 |
|
|
|
2,413 |
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations (Note 15) |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
Taxes payable, other than income taxes |
|
|
3,122 |
|
|
|
3,014 |
|
Deferred income taxes (Note 3) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Payroll and related charges |
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
918 |
|
Dividends and interest on capital payable (Note 17) |
|
|
3,693 |
|
|
|
3,068 |
|
Contingencies (Note 19) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
Advances from customers |
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
Employees post-retirement benefits obligation Pension (Note 16) |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
Other payables and accruals |
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,786 |
|
|
|
18,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (Note 12) |
|
|
10,510 |
|
|
|
11,503 |
|
Project financings (Note 14) |
|
|
4,192 |
|
|
|
3,629 |
|
Capital lease obligations (Note 15) |
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
Employees post-retirement benefits obligation Pension (Note 16) |
|
|
4,645 |
|
|
|
3,627 |
|
Employees post-retirement benefits obligation Health care (Note 16) |
|
|
5,433 |
|
|
|
3,004 |
|
Deferred income taxes (Note 3) |
|
|
2,916 |
|
|
|
2,166 |
|
Provision for abandonment (Note 9 (d)) |
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
842 |
|
Contingencies (Note 19) |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
Deferred purchase incentive (Note 21) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
144 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
428 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,629 |
|
|
|
26,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
1,966 |
|
|
|
1,074 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares authorized and issued (Note 17) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred share 2006 1,850,394,698 shares and 2005 1,849,478,028 shares |
|
|
7,718 |
|
|
|
4,772 |
|
Common share 2006 and 2005 2,536,673,672 shares |
|
|
10,959 |
|
|
|
6,929 |
|
Capital reserve fiscal incentive (Note 17) |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appropriated (Note 17) |
|
|
23,704 |
|
|
|
20,095 |
|
Unappropriated |
|
|
10,541 |
|
|
|
11,968 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments |
|
|
(6,202 |
) |
|
|
(9,432 |
) |
Postretirement benefit reserves adjustments net of tax pension cost |
|
|
(2,052 |
) |
|
|
(1,930 |
) |
Postretirement benefit reserves adjustments net of tax- health care cost |
|
|
(987 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities, net of tax |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
Unrecognized loss on cash flow hedge, net of tax |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,299 |
|
|
|
32,917 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
98,680 |
|
|
|
78,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-4
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except number of shares and earnings per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Sales of products and services |
|
|
93,893 |
|
|
|
74,065 |
|
|
|
51,954 |
|
Less: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Value-added and other taxes on sales and services |
|
|
(17,906 |
) |
|
|
(14,694 |
) |
|
|
(10,906 |
) |
Contribution of intervention in the economic domain
charge CIDE |
|
|
(3,640 |
) |
|
|
(3,047 |
) |
|
|
(2,620 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenues |
|
|
72,347 |
|
|
|
56,324 |
|
|
|
38,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
40,061 |
|
|
|
29,828 |
|
|
|
21,279 |
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
3,673 |
|
|
|
2,926 |
|
|
|
2,481 |
|
Exploration, including exploratory dry holes |
|
|
934 |
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
4,989 |
|
|
|
4,474 |
|
|
|
2,901 |
|
Impairment (Note 9 (e)) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
Research and development expenses |
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
51,486 |
|
|
|
40,245 |
|
|
|
28,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in results of non-consolidated companies (Note 10) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
Financial income (Note 13) |
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
Financial expenses (Note 13) |
|
|
(1,340 |
) |
|
|
(1,189 |
) |
|
|
(1,733 |
) |
Monetary and exchange variation on monetary assets and
liabilities, net (Note 13) |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
Employee benefit expense for non-active participants (Note 16) |
|
|
(1,017 |
) |
|
|
(994 |
) |
|
|
(650 |
) |
Other taxes |
|
|
(594 |
) |
|
|
(373 |
) |
|
|
(440 |
) |
Other expenses, net |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,700 |
) |
|
|
(1,487 |
) |
|
|
(1,426 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes, minority interest and extraordinary
item |
|
|
19,161 |
|
|
|
14,592 |
|
|
|
8,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-5
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Continued)
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except number of shares and earnings per share)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Income tax expense (Note 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
(5,011 |
) |
|
|
(4,223 |
) |
|
|
(2,114 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
(680 |
) |
|
|
(218 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,691 |
) |
|
|
(4,441 |
) |
|
|
(2,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in results of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(514 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before extraordinary item |
|
|
12,826 |
|
|
|
10,186 |
|
|
|
6,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary gain net of tax (Note 10 (b)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the year |
|
|
12,826 |
|
|
|
10,344 |
|
|
|
6,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to each class of shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
7,417 |
|
|
|
5,982 |
|
|
|
3,580 |
|
Preferred |
|
|
5,409 |
|
|
|
4,362 |
|
|
|
2,610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the year |
|
|
12,826 |
|
|
|
10,344 |
|
|
|
6,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share (Note 17 (c)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common and preferred |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before effect of extraordinary item |
|
|
2.92 |
|
|
|
2.32 |
|
|
|
1.41 |
* |
After effect of extraordinary item |
|
|
2.92 |
|
|
|
2.36 |
|
|
|
1.41 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per ADS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before effect of extraordinary item |
|
|
11.68 |
|
|
|
9.28 |
|
|
|
5.64 |
* |
After effect of extraordinary item |
|
|
11.68 |
|
|
|
9.44 |
|
|
|
5.64 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
2,536,673,672 |
|
|
|
2,536,673,672 |
|
|
|
2,536,673,672 |
* |
Preferred |
|
|
1,849,903,144 |
|
|
|
1,849,478,028 |
|
|
|
1,849,478,028 |
* |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Restated for the effect of the 4-1 stock split on September 1, 2005 (see Note 17). |
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-6
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the year |
|
|
12,826 |
|
|
|
10,344 |
|
|
|
6,190 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
3,673 |
|
|
|
2,926 |
|
|
|
2,481 |
|
Dry hole costs |
|
|
493 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
520 |
|
Loss on property, plant and equipment |
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
231 |
|
Minority interest in results of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
644 |
|
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
514 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
218 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
Foreign exchange and monetary loss (gain) |
|
|
465 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Accretion expense asset retirement obligation |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
Provision for uncollectible accounts |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
Equity in the results of non-consolidated companies |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(172 |
) |
Financial income (loss) on hedge operations |
|
|
434 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
(466 |
) |
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in operating assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
(1,510 |
) |
|
|
(1,027 |
) |
Petroleum and alcohol account |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
Interest receivable on government securities |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(533 |
) |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(1,527 |
) |
Advances to suppliers |
|
|
(552 |
) |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
Recoverable taxes |
|
|
(552 |
) |
|
|
(540 |
) |
|
|
(578 |
) |
Others |
|
|
261 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
838 |
|
Payroll and related charges |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
Taxes payable, other than income taxes |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
Income taxes payable |
|
|
(190 |
) |
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
120 |
|
Employees post-retirement benefits obligation Pension |
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
Employees post-retirement benefits obligation Health care |
|
|
656 |
|
|
|
557 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Contingencies |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
81 |
|
Provision for abandonment |
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
(171 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
(122 |
) |
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
21,077 |
|
|
|
15,115 |
|
|
|
8,155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-7
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(14,643 |
) |
|
|
(10,365 |
) |
|
|
(7,718 |
) |
Investment in non-consolidated companies |
|
|
(187 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
(142 |
) |
Investment in marketable securities |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
678 |
|
Acquisition of Liquigás Distribuidora S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(511 |
) |
Acquisition of USA trading and refining companies |
|
|
(416 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Received cash related to investment in Nigeria |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends received from non-consolidated companies |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
Restricted deposits for legal proceedings |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(14,681 |
) |
|
|
(10,207 |
) |
|
|
(7,743 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt, net issuances and repayments |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
(1,058 |
) |
|
|
(680 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance and draw-down of long-term debt |
|
|
2,251 |
|
|
|
1,697 |
|
|
|
1,457 |
|
Principal payments of long-term debt |
|
|
(2,555 |
) |
|
|
(1,120 |
) |
|
|
(1,160 |
) |
Repurchase of securities Notes (see Note 12(c)) |
|
|
(1,046 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from project financings |
|
|
1,524 |
|
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
971 |
|
Payments of project financings |
|
|
(1,209 |
) |
|
|
(1,392 |
) |
|
|
(652 |
) |
Payment of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(331 |
) |
Dividends paid to shareholders |
|
|
(3,144 |
) |
|
|
(2,104 |
) |
|
|
(1,785 |
) |
Dividends paid to minority interests |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used) in financing activities |
|
|
(4,354 |
) |
|
|
(2,625 |
) |
|
|
(2,204 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
2,042 |
|
|
|
2,283 |
|
|
|
(1,792 |
) |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
732 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
9,871 |
|
|
|
6,856 |
|
|
|
8,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
|
12,688 |
|
|
|
9,871 |
|
|
|
6,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest, net of amount capitalized |
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
1,083 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
4,686 |
|
|
|
3,843 |
|
|
|
2,054 |
|
Withholding income tax on financial investments |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing transactions during the year |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognition of asset retirement obligation SFAS 143 |
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
Consummation of gas hedge asset with deferred purchase incentive
liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-8
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars (except per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Preferred shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, |
|
|
4,772 |
|
|
|
4,772 |
|
|
|
2,973 |
|
Capital increase from undistributed earnings reserve (Note 17(a)) |
|
|
2,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,799 |
|
Capital increase from issue of preferred shares (Note 17(b)) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, |
|
|
7,718 |
|
|
|
4,772 |
|
|
|
4,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, |
|
|
6,929 |
|
|
|
6,929 |
|
|
|
4,289 |
|
Capital increase from undistributed earnings reserve (Note 17( c )) |
|
|
4,030 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, |
|
|
10,959 |
|
|
|
6,929 |
|
|
|
6,929 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital reserve fiscal incentive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
Transfer from unappropriated retained earnings |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative translation adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, |
|
|
(9,432 |
) |
|
|
(12,539 |
) |
|
|
(14,450 |
) |
Change in the year |
|
|
3,230 |
|
|
|
3,107 |
|
|
|
1,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, |
|
|
(6,202 |
) |
|
|
(9,432 |
) |
|
|
(12,539 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirements benefit reserves adjustments net of taxs pension cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, |
|
|
(1,930 |
) |
|
|
(1,975 |
) |
|
|
(1,588 |
) |
Accounting change SFAS 158 |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other decreases (increases) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(586 |
) |
Tax effect on above |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, |
|
|
(2,052 |
) |
|
|
(1,930 |
) |
|
|
(1,975 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirements benefit reserves adjustments net of tax health care cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting change SFAS 158 |
|
|
(987 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, |
|
|
(987 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, |
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) |
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
459 |
|
Tax effect on above |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
(156 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, |
|
|
446 |
|
|
|
356 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-9
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY (Continued)
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars (except per-share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Unrecognized loss on cash flow hedge, net of tax (Note 20 (e)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized losses |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect on above |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appropriated retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legal reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, |
|
|
2,225 |
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
1,089 |
|
Transfer from unappropriated
retained earnings, net of gain or
loss on translation |
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, |
|
|
3,045 |
|
|
|
2,225 |
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, |
|
|
17,439 |
|
|
|
9,688 |
|
|
|
9,372 |
|
Capital increase |
|
|
(6,969 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,439 |
) |
Transfer from unappropriated
retained earnings, net of gain or
loss on translation |
|
|
9,604 |
|
|
|
7,751 |
|
|
|
4,755 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, |
|
|
20,074 |
|
|
|
17,439 |
|
|
|
9,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory reserve |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, |
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
Transfer from unappropriated retained earnings, net of gain or loss
on translation |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, |
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total appropriated retained earnings |
|
|
23,704 |
|
|
|
20,095 |
|
|
|
11,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unappropriated retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, |
|
|
11,968 |
|
|
|
13,199 |
|
|
|
14,141 |
|
Net income for the year |
|
|
12,826 |
|
|
|
10,344 |
|
|
|
6,190 |
|
Dividends (per share: 2006 US$0.83 to common and preferred share;
2005 US$0.68 to common and preferred shares; 2004 US$0.42 to
common and preferred shares) |
|
|
(3,660 |
) |
|
|
(2,982 |
) |
|
|
(1,847 |
) |
Appropriation to fiscal incentive reserve |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
Appropriation to reserves |
|
|
(10,578 |
) |
|
|
(8,569 |
) |
|
|
(5,269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, |
|
|
10,541 |
|
|
|
11,968 |
|
|
|
13,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
44,299 |
|
|
|
32,917 |
|
|
|
22,506 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss) is comprised as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the year |
|
|
12,826 |
|
|
|
10,344 |
|
|
|
6,190 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustments |
|
|
3,230 |
|
|
|
3,107 |
|
|
|
1,911 |
|
Postretirements benefit reserves adjustments net of tax pension cost |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
(387 |
) |
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities |
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
303 |
|
Unrecognized loss on cash flow hedge |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
|
16,119 |
|
|
|
13,392 |
|
|
|
8,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
F-10
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
1. |
|
The Company and its Operations |
|
|
|
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS is Brazils national oil company and, directly or through
its subsidiaries (collectively, Petrobras or the Company), is engaged in the exploration,
exploitation and production of oil from reservoir wells, shale and other rocks, and in the
refining, processing, trade and transport of oil and oil products, natural gas and other fluid
hydrocarbons, in addition to other energy related activities. Additionally, Petrobras may
promote the research, development, production, transport, distribution and marketing of all
sectors of energy, as well as other related or similar activities. |
|
|
|
Petrobras was incorporated under Law No. 2,004 on October 3, 1953. Until November of 1995,
Petrobras was the exclusive agent of the Brazilian Federal Government (the Federal
Government) for purposes of exploiting the Federal Governments constitutional and statutory
control over activities involving exploration, production, refining, distribution, import,
export, marketing and transportation of hydrocarbons and oil products in Brazil and its
continental waters. When adopted in 1953, the relevant provisions of the Brazilian
constitution and statutory law gave the Federal Government a monopoly in these areas subject
only to the right of companies then engaged in oil refining and the distribution of oil and
oil products to continue those activities in Brazil. Therefore, except for limited competition
from those companies in their grandfathered activities, Petrobras had a monopoly over its
businesses for approximately 42 years. As a result of a change in the Brazilian constitution
in November of 1995, and the subsequent and ongoing implementation of that change, Petrobras
has ceased to be the Federal Governments exclusive agent in Brazils hydrocarbons sector and
up to 2001 had been operating in an environment of gradual deregulation and increasing
competition. |
|
|
|
In accordance with Law No. 9,478 (Petroleum Law) and Law No. 9,990, dated August 6, 1997 and
July 21, 2000, respectively, the fuel market in Brazil was totally liberalized beginning
January 1, 2002 permitting other companies to produce and sell on the domestic market, and
also to import and export oil products. |
|
|
|
The Company also has oil and gas operations in international locations, with the most
significant international operations being in other Latin American countries. |
F-11
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies |
|
|
|
In preparing these consolidated financial statements, the Company has followed accounting
policies that are in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America (U.S. GAAP). The preparation of these financial statements requires the
use of estimates and assumptions that affect the assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses
reported in the financial statements, as well as amounts included in the notes thereto. |
|
|
|
Estimates adopted by management include: oil and gas reserves, pension and health care
liabilities, environmental obligations, depreciation, depletion and amortization, abandonment
costs, contingencies and income taxes. While the Company uses its best estimates and
judgments, actual results could differ from those estimates as future confirming events occur. |
|
|
|
Certain prior years amounts have been reclassified to conform to current year presentation
standards. These reclassifications had no impact on the Companys net income. |
|
(a) |
|
Basis of financial statements preparation |
|
|
|
|
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. -
PETROBRAS (the Company) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) and the rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). U.S. GAAP differs in certain
respects from Brazilian accounting practice as applied by Petrobras in its statutory
financial statements prepared in accordance with Brazilian Corporate Law and regulations
promulgated by the Brazilian Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM). |
F-12
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
(a) |
|
Basis of financial statements preparation (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The U.S. dollar amounts for the years presented have been translated from the Brazilian
Real amounts in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards SFAS No. 52 -
Foreign Currency Translation (SFAS 52) as applicable to entities operating in
non-hyperinflationary economies. Transactions occurring in foreign currencies are first
remeasured to the Brazilian Real and then translated to the U.S. dollar, with
remeasurement gains and losses being recognized in the statements of income. While
Petrobras has selected the U.S. Dollar as its reporting currency, the functional currency
of Petrobras and all Brazilian subsidiaries is the Brazilian Real. The functional
currency of PIFCo and certain of the special purpose companies is the U.S. dollar, and
the functional currency of Petrobras Energia Participaciones S.A. PEPSA is the
Argentine Peso. |
|
|
|
|
The Company has translated all assets and liabilities into U.S. dollars at the current
exchange rate (R$2.138 and R$2.3407 to US$1.00 at December 31, 2006 and 2005,
respectively), and all accounts in the statements of income and cash flows (including
amounts relative to local currency indexation and exchange variances on assets and
liabilities denominated in foreign currency) at the average rates prevailing during the
year. The net translation gain in the amount of US$3,230 in 2006 (2005 US$3,107 and
2004 US$1,911) resulting from this remeasurement process was excluded from income and
presented as a cumulative translation adjustment (CTA) within Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income in the consolidated statements of changes in shareholders equity. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Basis of consolidation |
|
|
|
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all
majority-owned subsidiaries in which (a) the Company directly or indirectly has either a
majority of the equity of the subsidiary or otherwise has management control, or (b) the
Company has determined itself to be the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity
in accordance with FIN 46(R). |
F-13
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Basis of consolidation (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The following majority-owned subsidiaries and variable interest entities are
consolidated: |
|
|
|
Subsidiary companies |
|
Activity |
Petrobras Química S.A. PETROQUISA and subsidiaries
|
|
Petrochemical |
Petrobras Distribuidora S.A. BR and subsidiaries
|
|
Distribution |
BRASPETRO Oil Services Company BRASOIL and subsidiaries
|
|
International operations |
BRASPETRO Oil Company BOC and subsidiaries
|
|
International operations |
Petrobras International BRASPETRO B.V. PIB and subsidiaries (1)
|
|
International operations |
Petrobras Gás S.A. GASPETRO and subsidiaries
|
|
Gas transportation |
Petrobras International Finance Company PIFCo and subsidiaries
|
|
Financing |
Petrobras Transporte S.A. TRANSPETRO and subsidiaries
|
|
Transportation |
Downstream Participações Ltda. and subsidiaries
|
|
Refining and distribution |
Petrobras Netherlands BV PNBV and subsidiaries
|
|
Exploration and Production |
Petrobras Comercializadora de Energia Ltda. PCEL
|
|
Energy |
Petrobras Negócios Eletrônicos S.A. E-PETRO and subsidiaries
|
|
Corporate |
5283 Participações Ltda.
|
|
Corporate |
Fundo de Investimento Imobiliário RB Logística FII
|
|
Corporate |
UTE Nova Piratininga Ltda.
|
|
Energy |
FAFEN Energia S.A.
|
|
Energy |
Baixada Santista Energia Ltda.
|
|
Energy |
Sociedade Fluminense de Energia Ltda. SFE (2)
|
|
Energy |
TERMOAÇU S.A.
|
|
Energy |
TERMOBAHIA Ltda. (3)
|
|
Energy |
TERMOCEARÁ Ltda.
|
|
Energy |
TERMORIO S.A. (3)
|
|
Energy |
TERMOMACAÉ Ltda. (4)
|
|
Energy |
TERMOMACAÉ Comerc. de Energia Ltda. (4)
|
|
Energy |
Ibiritermo S.A.
|
|
Energy |
|
|
|
Special purpose entities consolidated according to FIN 46(R) |
|
Activity |
Albacora Japão Petróleo Ltda.
|
|
Exploration and Production |
Barracuda & Caratinga Holding Company B.V.
|
|
Exploration and Production |
Companhia Petrolífera Marlim
|
|
Exploration and Production |
NovaMarlim Petróleo S.A.
|
|
Exploration and Production |
Cayman Cabiunas Investments Co.
|
|
Exploration and Production |
Cia. de Desenv. e Modernização de Plantas Industriais CDMPI
|
|
Exploration and Production |
Companhia Locadora de Equipamentos Petrolíferos S.A. CLEP
|
|
Exploration and Production |
PDET Off-shore S.A.
|
|
Exploration and Production |
Companhia de Recuperação Secundária S.A.
|
|
Exploration and Production |
EVM Leasing Corporation
|
|
Exploration and Production |
Nova Transportadora do Nordeste S.A.
|
|
Transportation |
Nova Transportadora do Sudeste S.A.
|
|
Transportation |
Gasene Participações Ltda.
|
|
Transportation |
Manaus Geração Termelétrica Participações Ltda.
|
|
Energy |
Blade Securities Limited.
|
|
Corporate |
Codajás Coari Participações Ltda.
|
|
Transportation |
Charter Development CDC (5)
|
|
Exploration and Production |
Companhia Mexilhão do Brasil (6)
|
|
Exploration and Production |
F-14
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Basis of consolidation (Continued) |
|
(1) |
|
Parent Company of Petrobras Energia S.A. PEPSA others international
companies. |
|
|
(2) |
|
Consolidated according to ARB 51, commencing December 31, 2005.
Consolidated according to FIN 46(R), commencing December 31, 2003 until September
30, 2005. Formerly were not consolidated in Petrobras financial statements. |
|
|
(3) |
|
Consolidated according to ARB 51, commencing December 31, 2005.
Consolidated according to FIN 46(R), commencing December 31, 2003 until September
30, 2005. Formerly were accounted for as capital leases pursuant to SFAS 13. |
|
|
(4) |
|
Former Macaé Merchant. Consolidated according to ARB 51, commencing
December 31, 2005. Macaé Merchant formerly was consolidated according to FIN 46(R).
(see Note 18(l)). |
|
|
(5) |
|
Consolidated according to FIN 46(R). Company is a new SPE formed in 2005
to support project finance. |
|
|
(6) |
|
Consolidated according to FIN 46(R). Company is a new SPE formed in 2006
to support project finance. |
|
(c) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments that are readily
convertible into cash and have an original maturity of three months or less at date of
acquisition. |
|
|
(d) |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities are accounted for under SFAS No. 115 Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (SFAS 115) and have been classified by the
Company as available-for-sale, held-to-maturity or trading based upon intended strategies
with respect to such securities. The marketable securities classified as trading are
short term in nature as the investments are expected to be liquidated, sold, or used for
current cash requirements. The marketable securities classified as available-for-sale
are long term in nature as the investments are not expected to be sold or otherwise
liquidated in the next twelve months. Debt securities that management has the intent and
the ability to hold to maturity are classified as held-to-maturity. |
|
|
|
|
Trading securities are marked-to-market through current period earnings,
available-for-sale securities are marked-to-market through other comprehensive income,
and held-to-maturity securities are recorded at amortized cost. |
F-15
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
(d) |
|
Marketable securities (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The Company has certain available-for-sale investments in
companies with publicly traded shares. The Company also has available-for-sale and trading securities arising from its
consolidation of investments in an exclusive fund. There were no transfers between
categories of investments. |
|
|
(e) |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable is stated at estimated realizable values. An allowance for doubtful
accounts is provided in an amount considered by management to be sufficient to meet
probable future losses related to uncollectible accounts. |
|
|
(f) |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
Inventories are stated as follows: |
|
|
|
Raw materials are comprised principally of crude oil inventories, which
are stated at the lower of average cost or market value. |
|
|
|
|
Oil products and fuel alcohol are stated, respectively, at average
refining and purchase cost, adjusted when applicable to their realizable value. |
|
|
|
|
Materials and supplies are stated at average purchase cost, not
exceeding replacement value and imports in transit are stated at identified cost. |
|
(g) |
|
Investments in non-consolidated companies |
|
|
|
|
The Company uses the equity method of accounting for all long-term investments for which
it owns between 20% and 50% of the investees outstanding voting stock or has the ability
to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies of the investee.
The equity method requires periodic adjustments to the investment account to recognize
the Companys proportionate share in the investees results, reduced by receipt of
investees dividends. |
F-16
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
(h) |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
|
Costs incurred in oil and gas producing activities |
|
|
|
|
The costs incurred in connection with the exploration, development and production of
oil and gas are recorded in accordance with the successful efforts method. This
method requires that costs the Company incurs in connection with the drilling of
developmental wells and facilities in proved reserve production areas and successful
exploratory wells be capitalized. In addition, costs the Company incurs in connection
with geological and geophysical activities are charged to the statements of income in
the year incurred, and the costs relating to exploratory dry wells on unproven reserve
properties are charged to the statements of income when determined as dry or
uneconomical. |
|
|
|
|
Capitalized costs |
|
|
|
|
The capitalized costs are depreciated based on the unit-of-production method using
proved developed reserves. These reserves are estimated by the Companys geologists
and petroleum engineers in accordance with SEC standards and are reviewed annually, or
more frequently when there are indications of significant changes in the Companys
reserves. |
|
|
|
|
Property acquisition costs |
|
|
|
|
Costs of acquiring developed or undeveloped leaseholds including lease bonus,
brokerage, and other fees are capitalized. The costs of undeveloped properties that
become productive are transferred to a producing property account. |
|
|
|
|
Exploratory costs |
|
|
|
|
Exploratory wells that find oil and gas in an area requiring a major capital
expenditure before production begins are evaluated annually to assure that commercial
quantities of reserves have been found or that additional exploration work is underway
or planned. Exploratory costs related to areas where commercial quantities have been
found are capitalized, and exploratory costs where additional work is underway or
planned continue to be capitalized pending final evaluation. Exploratory well costs
not meeting either of these tests are charged to expense. All other exploratory costs
(including geological and geophysical costs) are expensed as incurred. Exploratory dry
holes are expensed. |
F-17
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
(h) |
|
Property, plant and equipment (Continued) |
|
|
|
Development costs |
|
|
|
|
Costs of development wells including dry holes, platforms, well equipment and
attendant production facilities are capitalized. |
|
|
|
|
Production costs |
|
|
|
|
Costs incurred with producing wells are recorded as inventories and are expensed when
the products are sold. |
|
|
|
|
Abandonment costs |
|
|
|
|
The Company makes its annual reviews and revision of its estimated costs associated
with well abandonment and the demobilization of oil and gas production areas,
considering new information about date of expected abandonment and revised cost
estimates to abandon. The changes in estimated asset retirement obligation are
principally related to the commercial declaration of new fields, certain changes in
cost estimates, and revisions to abandonment information provided for non-operated
joint ventures. |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization of leasehold costs of producing properties
are recorded using the unit-of-production method applied on a field by field basis as
a ratio of proved developed reserves. Production platform under capital lease are
depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the platforms.
Depreciation, depletion and amortization of all other capitalized costs (both tangible
and intangible) of proved oil and gas producing properties is recorded using the
unit-of-production method applied on a field by field basis as a ratio of proved
developed reserves produced. The straight-line method is used for assets with a useful
life shorted than the life of the field. |
F-18
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
(h) |
|
Property, plant and equipment (Continued) |
|
|
|
Depreciation, depletion and amortization (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Other plant and equipment are depreciated on a straight-line basis over the following
estimated useful lives: |
|
|
|
Building and improvements
|
|
25-40 years |
Equipment and other assets
|
|
3-30 years |
Platforms (1)
|
|
15-25 years |
Pipelines
|
|
30 years |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In 2006 the Company reviewed prospectively the estimation of
depreciation and changed the rate from 10-25 to years to 15-25 years and the
effect in the result was US$67. |
|
|
|
Impairment |
|
|
|
|
In accordance with SFAS No. 144 Impairment of Long-Lived Assets (SFAS 144),
management reviews long-lived assets, primarily property, plant and equipment to be
used in the business and capitalized costs relating to oil and gas producing
activities, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
value of an asset or group of assets may not be recoverable on the bases of
undiscounted future cash flows. The reviews are carried out at the lowest level of
assets to which the Company is able to attribute identifiable future cash flows. The
net book value of the underlying assets is adjusted to their fair value using a
discounted future cash flows model, if the sum of the expected undiscounted future
cash flows is less than the book value. |
|
|
|
|
Maintenance and repairs |
|
|
|
|
The actual costs of major maintenance, including turnarounds at refineries and
vessels, as well as other expenditures for maintenance and repairs, are expensed as
incurred. |
F-19
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
(h) |
|
Property, plant and equipment (Continued) |
|
|
|
Capitalized interest |
|
|
|
|
Interest is capitalized in accordance with SFAS No. 34 Capitalization of Interest
Cost (SFAS 34). Interest is capitalized on specific projects when a construction
process involves considerable time and involves major capital expenditures.
Capitalized interest is allocated to property, plant and equipment and amortized over
the estimated useful lives or unit-of-production method of the related assets.
Interest is capitalized at the Companys weighted average cost of borrowings. |
|
(i) |
|
Revenues, costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
Revenues from sales of crude oil and oil products, petrochemical products and others are
recognized on an accrual basis when the title is transferred to the customer. Revenues
from sales of natural gas are accounted for when the natural gas is transferred to the
customer. Subsequent adjustments to revenues based on production sharing agreements or
volumetric delivery differences are not significant. Costs and expenses are accounted for
on an accrual basis. |
|
|
(j) |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with SFAS No. 109 Accounting for
Income Taxes (SFAS 109), which requires an asset and liability approach to recording
current and deferred taxes. The effects of differences between the tax bases of assets
and liabilities and the amounts recognized in the financial statements have been treated
as temporary differences for the purpose of recording deferred income taxes. |
|
|
|
|
The Company records the tax benefit of all net operating losses as a deferred tax asset
and recognizes a valuation allowance for any part of this benefit which management
believes will not be recovered against future taxable income using a more likely than
not criterion. |
F-20
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
(k) |
|
Employees post-retirement benefits |
|
|
|
|
The Company sponsors a contributory defined-benefit pension plan covering substantially
all of its employees, which is accounted for by the Company in accordance with SFAS No.
87 Employers Accounting for Pensions (SFAS 87) and SFAS 158 Employers Accounting
for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans an Amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R) (SFAS 158). Disclosures related to the plan are
according to FASB Statement No. 132-R, Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Post-retirement Benefits (SFAS No. 132-R) (see Note 2 (r)). |
|
|
|
|
In addition, the Company provides certain health care benefits for retired employees and
their dependents. The cost of such benefits is recognized in accordance with SFAS No. 106
Post-retirement Benefits Other Than Pensions (SFAS 106) and SFAS 158. |
|
|
|
|
The Company also contributes to the Brazilian pension and government sponsored pensions
of international subsidiaries, social security and redundancy plans at rates based on
payroll, and such contributions are expensed as incurred. Further indemnities may be
payable upon involuntary severance of employees but, based on current operating plans,
management does not believe that any amounts payable under this plan will be significant. |
|
|
(l) |
|
Environmental and remediation costs |
|
|
|
|
Environmental and remediation costs relating to current operations are expensed or
capitalized, as appropriate, depending on whether such costs are expected to provide
future economic benefits. Liabilities are recognized when the costs are considered
probable and can be reasonably estimated. |
|
|
(m) |
|
Compensated absences |
|
|
|
|
The liability for future compensation of employees for vacations is accrued as earned. |
F-21
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
(n) |
|
Earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share are computed using the two-class method, which is an earnings
allocation formula that determines earnings per share for both preferred shares, which
are participating securities and common shares. The preferred shares participate in
dividends and undistributed earnings with the common shares at a predetermined formula.
Such formula allocates the net income, as if all of the net income for each year had been
distributed, first to the preferred shares in an amount equal to the preferred shares
priority minimum annual dividend of the higher of 3% of their shareholders equity or 5%
of their paid-in capital as stated in the statutory accounting records, then to common
shares in an amount equal to the preferred shares priority dividend on a per share basis
and any remaining net income is allocated equally to the common and preferred shares. As
a result of a 2005 stock split, each American Depositary Share (ADS) for common shares
represents four shares of the Companys common shares or four shares of the Companys
preferred shares. |
|
|
(o) |
|
Research and development costs |
|
|
|
|
Research and development costs are charged to expense when incurred. |
|
|
(p) |
|
Accounting for derivatives and hedging activities |
|
|
|
|
The Company applies SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities, together with its amendments and interpretations, referred to collectively
herein as SFAS 133. SFAS 133 requires that all derivative instruments be recorded in
the balance sheet of the Company as either an asset or a liability and measured at fair
value. SFAS 133 requires that changes in the derivatives fair value be recognized in the
income statement unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met; and the Company
designates. For derivatives designated as accounting hedges, fair value adjustments are
recorded either in the income statements or Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, a
component of shareholders equity, depending upon the type of accounting hedge and the
degree of hedge effectiveness. |
F-22
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
(p) |
|
Accounting for derivatives and hedging activities (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The Company uses derivative financial instruments for economic hedging purposes to
mitigate the risk of unfavorable price movements for crude oil purchases. These
instruments are marked-to-market with the associated gains or losses recognized as
Financial Income or Financial Expense. |
|
|
|
|
The Company may also use derivative financial instruments for economic hedging purposes
to mitigate the risk of unfavorable exchange-rate movements on its foreign
currency-denominated funding. Gains and losses from changes in the fair value of these
contracts are recognized as Financial Income or Financial Expense. |
|
|
|
|
For cash flow hedges, the gains and losses associated with the derivative instruments are
deferred and recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income until such time as the
hedged transaction impacts earnings, with the exception of any hedge ineffectiveness;
which is recorded directly in earnings. |
|
|
(q) |
|
Recently issued accounting pronouncements |
|
|
|
FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,
An Interpretation of FASB Statement 109 (FIN 48) |
|
|
|
In July 2006, the FASB issued FIN 48, that clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in
income taxes recognized in an enterprises financial statements and prescribes a
threshold of more-likely-than-not for recognition of tax benefits of uncertain tax
positions taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides related
guidance on measurement, derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, and
disclosure. The provisions of FIN 48 will be effective for the Company on January 1,
2007, with any cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle recorded as an
adjustment to opening retained earnings. The Company is in the process of assessing the
impact of adopting FIN 48 on its results of operations and financial position. The
Company does not expect that the adoption of FIN 48 will have a material effect on the
Companys financial position or results from operations. |
F-23
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
2. |
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) |
|
(q) |
|
Recently issued accounting pronouncements (Continued) |
|
|
|
FASB Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157) |
|
|
|
|
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 157, which will become effective for the
Company on January 1, 2008. This standard defines fair value, establishes a framework
for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS
157 does not require any new fair value measurements but would apply to assets and
liabilities that are required to be recorded at fair value under other accounting
standards. The impact, if any, to the Company from the adoption of SFAS 157 in 2008
will depend on the Companys assets and liabilities at that time that are required to
be measured at fair value. |
|
|
|
|
FASB Statement 159 The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and
Financial Liabilities. SFAS 159 |
|
|
|
|
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS 159 The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets
and Financial Liabilities. SFAS 159, that permits the measurement of certain
financial instruments at fair value. Entities may choose to measure eligible items at
fair value at specified election dates, reporting unrealized gains and losses on such
items at each subsequent reporting period. SFAS 159 is effective for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently evaluating the potential
impact of the fair value option but it is not expected to have a significant effect on
reported financial position or statements of income. |
|
(r) |
|
Recently adopted accounting pronouncements |
|
|
|
FASB Statement 158 Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension
and Other Postretirement Plans an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and
132(R) (SFAS 158) |
|
|
|
|
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 158, which became effective for the Company on
December 31, 2006. See Note 16(d). |
F-24
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
3. |
|
Income Taxes |
|
|
|
Income taxes in Brazil comprise federal income tax and social contribution, which is an
additional federal income tax. The statutory enacted tax rates for income tax and social
contribution have been 25% and 9%, respectively for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004. |
|
|
|
The Companys taxable income is substantially generated in Brazil and is therefore subject to
the Brazilian statutory tax rate. The following table reconciles the tax calculated based upon
statutory tax rates to the income tax expense recorded in these consolidated financial
statements. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Income before income taxes, minority interest and
extraordinary item: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
18,589 |
|
|
|
13,739 |
|
|
|
8,168 |
|
International |
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,161 |
|
|
|
14,592 |
|
|
|
8,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax expense at statutory rates |
|
|
(6,515 |
) |
|
|
(4,961 |
) |
|
|
(3,038 |
) |
Adjustments to derive effective tax rate: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-deductible post-retirement health-benefits |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(244 |
) |
|
|
(157 |
) |
Change in valuation allowance |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Tax benefit on interest on shareholders equity |
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
|
|
650 |
|
Others |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense per consolidated statement of income |
|
|
(5,691 |
) |
|
|
(4,441 |
) |
|
|
(2,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-25
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
3. |
|
Income Taxes (Continued) |
|
|
|
The following table shows a breakdown between domestic and international income tax and social
contribution expense (benefit) recorded in these consolidated financial statements: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Income tax expense per consolidated statement of income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
(4,750 |
) |
|
|
(3,973 |
) |
|
|
(1,922 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
(686 |
) |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
(258 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,436 |
) |
|
|
(4,152 |
) |
|
|
(2,180 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
(261 |
) |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(192 |
) |
Deferred |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,691 |
) |
|
|
(4,441 |
) |
|
|
(2,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TRANSPORTADORA BRASILEIRA GASODUTO BOLÍVIA-BRASIL S.A. TBG, a subsidiary of GASPETRO,
has accumulated tax losses which have resulted in income tax and social contribution
carryforwards amounting to US$345 as of December 31, 2006 (US$377 in 2005). These credits are
being carried forward on a monthly basis against the taxes payable, in accordance with the
existing legislation. These credits were accumulated between 1999 and 2002, based on a
technical study approved by the Board of Directors on the expected generation of future taxable
income and profitability in the past three years which allows realization thereof in ten years
at the maximum.
PEPSA also has tax credits amounting to US$366 as of December 31, 2006 (US$443 in 2005), which
could be offset against future taxable income and, for which a valuation allowance is
recognized in the consolidated financial statements for December 31, 2006 and 2005. As of
December 31, 2006, PEPSA has booked a US$335 allowance for tax loss carryforwards (US$352 in
2005) because, as of such dates, management believes that it is more likely than not that
future taxable income will not be sufficient to absorb the net deductible temporary differences
and accumulated tax loss carryforwards. These tax loss carryforwards have been generated mainly
due to operating losses occurred during the Argentinean crisis in 2001 and 2002.
F-26
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
3. |
|
Income Taxes (Continued) |
|
|
|
Annually PEPSAs management evaluates the recovery of tax loss carryforwards taking into
consideration, among other elements, the projected business profits, tax planning strategies,
temporariness of future taxable income, considering the term of expiration of the loss
carryforwards, the future reversions of the existing temporary differences and the recent-year
tax history. All the evidence available both positive and negative is duly weighted and
considered in the analysis. |
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the PEPSAs management partially reversed the tax loss
carryforward allowance booked in prior years recognizing a tax benefit of US$17 and US$63,
respectively. PEPSAs management will continue analyzing the feasibility of recovering the tax
loss carryforwards for which the allowance was recognized. |
|
|
|
The deferred tax amounts recorded are principally generated through transactions occurring in
Brazil and there are no significant deferred tax amounts from international locations. There
is no netting of taxes between international jurisdictions. |
|
|
|
The major components of the deferred income tax accounts in the consolidated balance sheet are
as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Lease obligations |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Provision for profit sharing |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
Employees post-retirement benefits |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
Other temporary differences |
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
673 |
|
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other temporary differences |
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net current deferred tax assets |
|
|
645 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current deferred tax assets |
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-27
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
3. |
|
Income Taxes (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees post-retirement benefits, net of Accumulated
postretirements benefit reserves adjustments |
|
|
2,101 |
|
|
|
1,291 |
|
Interest on shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
159 |
|
Deferred charges |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
Tax loss carryforwards |
|
|
514 |
|
|
|
592 |
|
Investments |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
Lease obligations |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Inventories revaluation |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Derivatives |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Provision for contingencies |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Project financings |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Other temporary differences, not significant individually |
|
|
328 |
|
|
|
110 |
|
Valuation allowance |
|
|
(426 |
) |
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,037 |
|
|
|
2,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized exploration and development costs |
|
|
(4,041 |
) |
|
|
(2,995 |
) |
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(1,140 |
) |
|
|
(584 |
) |
Hedge |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(199 |
) |
Investments |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
Tax effect on unrealized loss on investments available-for-sale |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
(168 |
) |
Other temporary differences, not significant individually |
|
|
(416 |
) |
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,892 |
) |
|
|
(4,310 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net non-current deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(2,855 |
) |
|
|
(2,159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred tax assets |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(2,916 |
) |
|
|
(2,166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
(2,210 |
) |
|
|
(1,686 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-28
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
3. |
|
Income Taxes (Continued) |
|
|
|
Although realization of net deferred tax assets is not assured, management believes that,
except where a valuation allowance has been provided, such realization is more likely than not
to occur. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable could, however, be reduced
if estimates of future taxable income are reduced. Tax loss carryforwards generated in Brazil
do not expire and are available for offset against future taxable income, limited to 30% of
taxable income in any individual year. PEPSA tax loss carryfoward principally expire in years
beyond 2007, and may be offset against future taxable income without limitation. The following
presents the changes in the valuation allowance for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and
2004: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Balance at January 1, |
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
|
(596 |
) |
|
|
(749 |
) |
Reductions |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustments |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, |
|
|
(426 |
) |
|
|
(524 |
) |
|
|
(596 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company has not recognized a deferred tax liability of approximately US$190 for the
undistributed earnings of its foreign operations that arose in 2006 and prior years as the
Company considers these earnings to be indefinitely reinvested. A deferred tax liability will
be recognized when the Company no longer demonstrates that it plans to permanently reinvest
the undistributed earnings. As of December 31, 2006 the undistributed earnings of these
subsidiaries were approximately US$560. |
4. |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Cash |
|
|
1,692 |
|
|
|
1,539 |
|
Investments Brazilian reais(1) |
|
|
4,072 |
|
|
|
6,280 |
|
Investments U.S. dollars (2) |
|
|
6,924 |
|
|
|
2,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,688 |
|
|
|
9,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Comprised primarily federal public bonds with immediate liquidity and the securities are
tied to the American dollar quotation or to the remuneration of the Interbank Deposits DI. |
|
(2) |
|
Comprised primarily by Time Deposit and securities with fixed income. |
F-29
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
5. Marketable Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Marketable securities classification: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale |
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
163 |
|
Trading |
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
Held-to-maturity |
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Current portion of marketable securities |
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
(456 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of marketable securities |
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities are comprised primarily of amounts the Company has invested in an
exclusive fund, excluding the Companys own securities, which are considered repurchased. The
exclusive fund is consolidated, and the equity and debt securities within the portfolio are
classified as trading or available-for-sale under SFAS 115 based on managements intent.
Trading securities are principally Brazilian bonds, which are bought and sold frequently with
the objective of making short-term-profits on market price changes. Available-for-sale
securities are principally, LCN (Credit Liquid Note) agreements and certain other bonds for
which the Company does not have current expectations to trade actively. Trading securities are
presented as current assets, as they are expected to be used in the near term for cash funding
requirements. Available-for-sale securities are presented as other assets, as they are not
expected to be sold or liquidated within the next twelve months. |
|
|
|
The Company holds National Treasury Bonds Series P (NTN-P) issued by the Federal Government
which are accounted for as available-for-sale securities in accordance with SFAS 115. |
F-30
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
6. |
|
Accounts Receivable, Net |
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net consisted of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Trade |
|
|
7,944 |
|
|
|
7,889 |
|
Less: Allowance for uncollectible accounts |
|
|
(1,120 |
) |
|
|
(1,063 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,824 |
|
|
|
6,826 |
|
Less: Long-term accounts receivable, net |
|
|
(513 |
) |
|
|
(642 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current accounts receivable, net |
|
|
6,311 |
|
|
|
6,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Allowance for uncollectible accounts
Balance at January 1, |
|
|
(1,063 |
) |
|
|
(904 |
) |
|
|
(780 |
) |
Additions |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
(164 |
) |
Write-offs |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Cumulative translation adjustments |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, |
|
|
(1,120 |
) |
|
|
(1,063 |
) |
|
|
(904 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance on short-term receivables |
|
|
(584 |
) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance on long-term receivables |
|
|
(536 |
) |
|
|
(867 |
) |
|
|
(754 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-31
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
6. |
|
Accounts Receivable, Net (Continued) |
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, long-term receivables include US$608 and US$599 respectively
relating to payments made by the Company to suppliers and subcontractors on behalf of certain
contractors. These contractors had been hired by the subsidiary BRASOIL for the
construction/conversion of vessels into FPSO (Floating Production, Storage and Offloading)
and FSO (Floating, Storage and Offloading) and failed to make the payments to their suppliers
and subcontractors. The Company made the payments to avoid further delays in the
construction/conversion of the vessels and consequent losses to BRASOIL. |
|
|
|
Based on consultations with legal advisers, the Companys management has determined that these
payments can be reimbursed, since they represent BRASOILs rights with respect to the
contractors, for which reason judicial action was filed with international courts to seek
reimbursement. However, as a result of the uncertainties related to the realization of such
receivables, the Company recorded an allowance for all credits not backed by collateral. Such
allowance amounted to US$536 and US$527 as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Products |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil products |
|
|
2,220 |
|
|
|
2,020 |
|
Fuel alcohol |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,380 |
|
|
|
2,086 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials, mainly crude oil |
|
|
2,989 |
|
|
|
2,266 |
|
Materials and supplies |
|
|
1,274 |
|
|
|
1,047 |
|
Others |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,783 |
|
|
|
5,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current inventories |
|
|
6,573 |
|
|
|
5,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term inventories |
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-32
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
8. |
|
Recoverable Taxes |
|
|
|
Recoverable taxes consisted of the following: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Local: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic value-added tax (ICMS) (1) |
|
|
2,829 |
|
|
|
1,830 |
|
Income tax and social contribution |
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
PASEP/COFINS (2) |
|
|
291 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
Foreign value-added tax (IVA) |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
Other recoverable taxes |
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,885 |
|
|
|
2,726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Long-term recoverable taxes |
|
|
(1,292 |
) |
|
|
(639 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current recoverable taxes |
|
|
2,593 |
|
|
|
2,087 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Domestic value-added sales tax are composed of credits generated by commercial
operations and by the acquisition of property, plant and equipment and can be offset with
taxes of the same nature. |
|
(2) |
|
PASEP and COFINS are social security contributions payable in respect of sales of
products and services and financial revenues. |
|
|
|
These contributions and the domestic value-added tax (ICMS) are not cumulative and
amounts paid related to these taxes in the acquisition of products and/or services can
be offset when these products and services are sold, which means a tax credit is
generated when the purchase is made and such credit is then offset upon sale to final
customer. |
|
|
|
The income tax and social contribution recoverable will be offset against future taxable
income. |
|
|
|
Petrobras plans to fully recover these taxes, and as such, no allowance has been
provided. |
F-33
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
9. |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net |
|
(a) |
|
Composition of balance |
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost, are summarized as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
Cost |
|
depreciation |
|
Net |
|
Cost |
|
depreciation |
|
Net |
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
2,422 |
|
|
|
(935 |
) |
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
1,696 |
|
|
|
(755 |
) |
|
|
941 |
|
Oil and gas assets |
|
|
26,274 |
|
|
|
(10,605 |
) |
|
|
15,669 |
|
|
|
21,500 |
|
|
|
(9,589 |
) |
|
|
11,911 |
|
Equipment and other assets |
|
|
34,654 |
|
|
|
(16,996 |
) |
|
|
17,658 |
|
|
|
28,359 |
|
|
|
(14,902 |
) |
|
|
13,457 |
|
Capital lease platforms and vessels |
|
|
2,660 |
|
|
|
(1,322 |
) |
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
2,651 |
|
|
|
(1,233 |
) |
|
|
1,418 |
|
Rights and concessions |
|
|
1,828 |
|
|
|
(336 |
) |
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
1,492 |
|
|
|
(210 |
) |
|
|
1,282 |
|
Land |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226 |
|
Materials |
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
|
820 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
820 |
|
Expansion projects - |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and installations in progress: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and production |
|
|
10,731 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,731 |
|
|
|
9,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,553 |
|
Supply |
|
|
5,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,152 |
|
|
|
4,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,546 |
|
Gas and energy |
|
|
3,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,231 |
|
|
|
1,356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,356 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
185 |
|
International |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,091 |
|
|
|
(30,194 |
) |
|
|
58,897 |
|
|
|
72,609 |
|
|
|
(26,689 |
) |
|
|
45,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-34
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
9. |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
New Hydrocarbons Law of Bolivia |
|
|
|
|
The new Bolivian Hydrocarbons Law 3,058 has been in force since May 19, 2005. This law revokes
the former Hydrocarbons Law 1,689 dated April 30, 1996. |
|
|
|
|
The new law establishes, among other matters, a higher tax burden for companies of the sector,
through royalties of 18% and a direct tax on hydrocarbons (IDH) of 32%, to be applied directly
on 100% of the production, on top of taxes in force by operation of Law No. 843. In addition,
the new legislation determines substitution of shared risk contracts for new contracts
observing the models established in the Law, and introduces changes in the oil products
distribution activity. |
|
|
|
|
On May 20, 2005, contracts were entered into for association among Yacimientos Petrolíferos
Fiscales Bolivianos YPFB (Bolivian state-owned company) and fuel distribution companies to
extend the term of Distributors operations up until YPFB accumulates sufficient funds to
develop this segment all over the Bolivian territory. On June 30, 2006 the contracts term
expired through which the major distribution companies distributed hydrocarbons in Bolivia.
YPFB took over national distribution as from that date. The company Petrobras Bolívia
Distribución, which allowed the ownership of a major part of this business, is still operating
in the sector through the service stations it owns. |
|
|
|
|
As of May 1, 2006, Supreme Decree 28,701 was enacted in Bolivia, through which, the natural
hydrocarbon resources were nationalized. As a consequence, the companies that are currently
engaged in gas and petroleum production activities, will have to transfer the ownership of all
hydrocarbon production to Yacimientos Petrolíferos Fiscales Bolivianos (YPFB). A transition
period has also been established of 180 days as from the date the aforementioned decree is
enacted, in which companies that are currently operating should execute the new contracts
established by YPFB. Companies which have not executed these contracts by the end of this term
may be unable to continue operating in the country. |
F-35
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
9. |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
New Hydrocarbons Law of Bolivia (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The aforementioned Decree establishes that fields with a certified average natural gas
production of over 100 million cubic feet per day in 2005, as is the case with the San Alberto
and San Antonio fields where the Company operates, an additional amount will be paid to YPFB of
32% over of the production value, rising to a total of 82% of the Bolivian governments
interest. The Bolivian Ministry of Hydrocarbons and Energy shall determine on a case-by-case
basis via auditing the final share to be paid to the Companies in the contract to be executed.
Up to December 31, 2006 the Company had recorded a provision to pay the additional share to
YPFB of 32% on the hydrocarbon production, to an amount equal to US$99. The regulatory decrees
which among other matters shall establish the means for paying this share have not yet been
issued. |
|
|
|
|
Furthermore, according to this decree the State is nationalizing the shares required for YPFB
to control, with a minimum of 50% plus one share, Petrobras Bolívia Refinación S.A. PBR, in
which Petrobras has an indirect interest of 100% (Petrobras International Braspetro B.V. 51%
and Petrobras Energia S.A. 49%). The equity interest will be transferred to YPFB when the
parties reach an agreement about the amount of economic compensation to be paid by YPFB to
Petrobras, besides the former compliance of some legal and statutory assumptions. The parties
have not yet commenced the assessment process. |
|
|
|
|
On October 28, 2006 Petrobras Bolívia and its partners executed operating contracts with YPFB
for San Alberto and San Antonio fields. These contracts establish that the revenues,
royalties, profit shares, IDH, shipment and compression will be absorbed by YPFB, and the cost
of production and investments made by the companies should be reimbursed as remuneration to the
owner. Any difference which may exist will be distributed between the Bolivian state company
and the companies, at percentages varying according to production and the investment recovery
factor. These contracts will come into force as from approval by the Bolivian National Congress
and their official registration. |
|
|
|
|
In a document attached to contracts entitled Investments made, Petrobras and its partners
state the investment amounts net of amortization, which will be reviewed taking into account
the results of the audits contracted by the Hydrocarbons Ministry, that are currently in
progress. To date, the Company is not aware of the result of these audits and the possible
effects on its investments. |
F-36
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
9. |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
New Hydrocarbons Law of Bolivia (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Supreme Decree 28,900-A issued October 28, 2006 established that the companies will continue
operating in Bolivia in accordance with Supreme Decree 28,701, including article 3, paragraph 1
which establishes the additional payment of 32% for the San Alberto and San Antonio fields
until the aforementioned contracts have been registered. |
|
|
|
|
On November 28, 2006 the National Congress approved the 44 oil contracts (exploration and
production), which include the contracts that Petrobras participates in/or operates, which
mainly include the San Alberto and San Antonio fields. On January 11, 2007 Laws were published
by which the Bolivian Legislative Branch approved these contracts, including those referring to
the San Alberto and San Antonio fields. To date the contracts have not been registered at a
registry office, despite the fact there is no justifiable reason for the delay. The contracts
will come into force after they have been effectively registered. |
|
|
|
|
PBR and PEBIS continue their normal operations under the control and management of the Company,
and hence their consolidated financial statements are still being included in the Companys
consolidated financial statements. The consolidated total assets balance of PEBIS as of
December 31, 2006 amounted to US$1,173. |
|
|
(c) |
|
Review of operating agreements in Venezuela |
|
|
|
|
In March of 2006, PESA, through its controlled and associated companies in Venezuela, entered
into Memoranda of Understanding (MOU) with PDVSA and Corporación Venezolana del Petróleo S.A.
(CVP) in order to finalize the migration of operational agreements to mixed-capital companies.
The MOUs establish that the interest of private partners in mixed-capital corporate companies
should be limited to 40%, while the Venezuelan government participates with the remaining 60%.
Thus, PESAs indirect interest in the fields of Oritupano Leona, La Concepción, Acema and Mata
Areas was defined as being of 22%, 36%, 34.5% and 34.5%, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
Pursuant to the terms of the MOU, CVP shall acknowledge dividable and transferable credits in
favor of the private companies with interest in the mixed-capital companies, which shall not be
subject to interest and may be used in payment of the acquisition bonus of new areas for
petroleum exploration and production activities or for a license to engage in gas exploration
and production. |
F-37
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
9. |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net (Continued) |
|
(c) |
|
Review of operating agreements in Venezuela (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
During the transition period and until the mixed capital companies are in operation, the
consortias operations have been conducted and supported by Petrobras Energia Venezuela under
the supervision of an integrated operating committee, on which PDVSA representatives shall form
the majority. |
|
|
|
|
Due to the change in structure of shareholding interest in the mixed capital companies, from
April 1, 2006 the Company no longer consolidates the assets, liabilities and results of the
aforesaid operations in its consolidated statements, but presents them as equity investments in
non-consolidated companies and other investments, which increased the balance of such account
by US$878. |
|
|
(d) |
|
New Hydrocarbons Law in Ecuador |
|
|
|
|
In April 2006, the Law which amended the Hydrocarbons Law (Ley de Hidrocarburos) was enacted in
Ecuador, which establishes the Government shall hold a minimum share of 50% in the
extraordinary revenues, generated by increases to the sale price of Ecuadorian oil (average
monthly effective FOB sale price) as compared to the monthly average oil sale price established
in the contract, stated in the currency of the month of settlement. In July, 2006 the
regulations of said Law were published which Ecuadortlc S.A., a subsidiary of PESA, and
Petroecuador interpreted differently. The application of this law is being disputed by
Ecuadortlc and Petroecuador. |
|
|
(e) |
|
SFAS No. 143 Accounting for asset retirement obligations |
|
|
|
|
Since January 1, 2003, Petrobras adopted SFAS No. 143 Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations (SFAS 143). Under SFAS 143, the fair value of asset retirement obligations are
recorded as liabilities on a discounted basis when they are incurred, which is typically at the
time the related assets are installed. Amounts recorded for the related assets will be
increased by the amount of these obligations and depreciated over the related useful lives of
such assets. Over time, the amounts recognized as liabilities will be accreted for the change
in their present value until the related assets are retired or sold. |
|
|
|
|
Measurement of asset retirement obligations is based on currently enacted laws and regulations,
existing technology and site-specific costs. There are no assets legally restricted to be used
in the settlement of asset retirement obligations. |
F-38
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
9. |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net (Continued) |
|
(e) |
|
SFAS No. 143 Accounting for asset retirement obligations (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
A summary of the annual changes in the abandonment provision is presented as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
Balance as of December 31, 2004 |
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and impairment |
|
|
|
|
Accretion expenses |
|
|
51 |
|
Liabilities incurred |
|
|
356 |
|
Liabilities settled |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Revision of provision |
|
|
(21 |
) |
Cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2005 |
|
|
842 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and impairment |
|
|
|
|
Accretion expenses |
|
|
32 |
|
Liabilities incurred |
|
|
632 |
|
Liabilities settled |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Revision of provision |
|
|
(112 |
) |
Cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f) |
|
Impairment |
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, the Company recorded impairment charges
of US$21, US$156 and US$65, respectively. During 2006, the impairment charge was primarily
related to producing properties in Brazil and principle amounts were related to Petrobras
Córrego de Pedras on-shore field. During 2005, the impairment charge was primarily related to
investments in Venezuela (US$134), due to the tax and legal changes implemented by the Ministry
of Energy and Petroleum of Venezuela (MEP), previously mentioned. During 2004, the impairment
charge was related to producing properties in Brazil, principle amounts were related to the
Companys Ciobas off-shore field (US$30). The impairment expenses recorded in 2004 were
primarily due to capital expenditures made in 2004 to producing fields with only marginal
reserves. |
F-39
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
9. |
|
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net (Continued) |
|
(g) |
|
Return of exploration areas to the ANP |
|
|
|
|
In the 2006 financial year, Petrobras returned to the National Petroleum Agency ANP the rights
over: |
- The BCE-5 exploratory concession total return of the retained area for assessment;
- The BT-POT- 26 exploratory concession, blocks POT-T-210, POT-T-211 and POT-T-257
total early return of the three blocks;
- The.BT-POT-35.exploratory.concession,.block..POT-T-563 total early return of the
block;
- The REC-T-41 exploratory concession, block BT-REC-11 total return of the retained area for
assessment; and
- The exploratory concessions BC-60, BES-100, BC-20, BC-30, BS-400, BS-500 and BC-50 total
returns of the blocks, not including the areas retained by Commercial Declaration or annexing.
|
(h) |
|
Return to ANP of fields at the Production Stage operated by Petrobras |
|
|
|
|
In the 2006 financial year, Petrobras returned to the National Petroleum Agency ANP the rights
over the fields Beija-Flor, Dias DÁvila, Fazenda Gameleira, Miranga Leste and Vale do Quiricó,
all located in the state of Bahia. |
|
|
(i) |
|
8th bidding for exploratory blocks of ANP |
|
|
|
|
In November of 2006, Petrobras acquired twenty-one new exploratory blocks of the twenty-two
areas it competed for in the 8th Round of Bidding conducted by the National Petroleum Agency -
ANP. |
|
|
|
|
Petrobras acquired exclusive rights for seven blocks and a further fourteen blocks in
consortium with other companies, two of which the Company will operate. |
|
|
|
|
The bonuses offered by Petrobras and its partners amounted to US$130, with the Company
accounting for US$116. This Bid has been suspended in full, because of the injunction awarded
by the Federal Courts of the Federal District. The bonuses will be paid when this issue is
resolved. |
F-40
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
10. |
|
Investments in Non-Consolidated Companies and Other Investments |
|
|
|
Petrobras conducts portions of its business through investments in companies accounted for using
the equity and cost methods. These non-consolidated companies are primarily engaged in the
petrochemicals and product transportation businesses. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
Total ownership |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Equity method |
|
|
20 % - 50 |
%(1) |
|
|
1,883 |
(2) |
|
|
974 |
|
Investments available-for-sale |
|
|
8% - 17 |
% |
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
Investments at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,262 |
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As described further in this Note, certain thermoelectrics with ownership of 10% to 50%
are also accounted as equity investments due to particularities of significant influence. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes US$878 related to investments in Venezuela, excluded from consolidation in
2006. (See Note 9 (c)). |
|
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had investments in companies with publicly traded shares: BRASKEM S.A., Petroquímica União S.A. PQU and Companhia Petroquímica do Sul S.A. -
COPESUL. The Companys investments in these companies with publicly traded shares amounts to less
than 20% of the investees total voting shares, are classified as available-for-sale and have
been recorded at market value. The Company has recorded unrealized gains (losses) for the
difference between the fair value and the cost of the investment on these investments of US$548
and US$494 as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. These holding gains are reflected as a
component of shareholders equity, net of tax, with changes in the unrealized balance recorded as
a component of comprehensive income. |
|
|
|
The Company also has investments in companies for the purpose of developing, constructing,
operating, maintaining and exploring thermoelectric plants included in the federal governments
Priority Thermoelectric Energy Program, with equity interests of between 10% and 50%. The balance
of these investments as of December 31, 2006 and 2005 includes US$20 and US$179 respectively, and
are included as equity method investments due to the Companys ability to exercise significant
influence over such operations. |
|
|
|
The Companys investments in equity of non-consolidated companies generated equity earnings
(losses) in results of non-consolidated companies of US$28 for the year ended December 31, 2006
(2005 US$139; 2004 US$172). |
|
(a) |
|
Acquisition of interest of CEG RIO |
|
|
|
|
Petrobras, through its subsidiary Petrobras Gás S.A. GASPETRO, concluded on July 11, 2005 the
acquisition of 12.41% of the shares (common and preferred) of Distribuidora de Gás Natural
Canalizado CEG-RIO, for US$17. With this acquisition, the shareholdings of GASPETRO in said
company were increased to 37.41%. The Company has accounted for its investment using the equity
method, retrospectively from the date of the initial investment. Due to the immateriality of
the involved amounts the Company has not retrospectively applied the equity method to the 2004
Financial Statements.The acquisition of the additional interest in CEG RIO was recorded using
the purchase method of accounting. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Exchange of assets Petrobras and REPSOL YPF |
|
|
|
|
On December 28, 2000, Petrobras and Repsol YPF entered into a Contract for the Exchange of
Assets, under which Petrobras, in exchange of shares of EG3 in Argentina, assigned to Repsol
YPF a 30% shareholding in Refinaria Alberto Pasqualini REFAP, the right to sell fuels in
approximately 230 gas stations of BR Distribuidora and a 10% interest in the Albacora Leste
field. |
F-41
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
|
10. |
|
Investments in Non-Consolidated Companies and Other Investments (Continued) |
|
|
The contract established in its 4th clause that the parties receiving the shares of EG3 and
REFAP should, in the course of eight years after January 1, 2001, review every year the
reference values of EG3 Group and REFAP S.A. (denominated escalators) to adjust them
observing the conditions of said clause and to allow determining at the end of the period the
definitive value of the shares of EG3 and REFAP, as well as definitive assets position and
payment thereof to the creditor, under common agreement between the parties. Under the
Escalators Liquidation Agreement entered into on December 29, 2005, and effective as from
January 1, 2006, the companies performed early and definitive liquidation of the escalators. |
|
|
|
The final value, including monetary restatement, due by Repsol YPF to Petrobras, related to EG3
share, for the full period of 8 (eight) years, including the projections for 2006, 2007 and
2008 amounted to US$335. Of this amount US$95 was applied to reduce property, plant and
equipment and US$158 was recorded as extraordinary gain, net of US$82 of income tax on December
31, 2005. |
F-42
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
10. |
|
Investments in Non-Consolidated Companies and Other Investments (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Exchange of assets Petrobras and REPSOL YPF (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The final value, including monetary restatement, due by Petrobras to Repsol YPF, related to the
30% shareholding in REFAP, for the full period of 8 (eight) years, including the projections
for 2006, 2007 and 2008 amounted to US$255. This amount was recorded as component of other
expenses, net. |
|
|
|
|
Those amounts are definitive, and not subject to review or verification by any of the parties,
thus liquidating application and quantification of escalators, as provided for in the
Escalators Liquidation Agreement. |
11. |
|
Petroleum and Alcohol Account Receivable from Federal Government |
|
(a) |
|
Changes in the Petroleum and Alcohol account |
|
|
|
|
The following summarizes the changes in the Petroleum and Alcohol account for the years ended
December 31, 2006 and 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Opening balance |
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
Financial income (Note 24) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Translation gain |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Petroleum and Alcohol account arose in periods previous to December 31, 2002 as a
result of regulation in the fuels market. The Federal Government has certified the balance and
placed a portion of the amount (US$53) in a restricted use account. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Settlement of the Petroleum and Alcohol Accounts with the Federal Government |
|
|
|
|
As defined in Law No. 10,742 dated October 06, 2003, the settlement of the Petroleum and
Alcohol account with the Federal Government should have been completed by June 30, 2004.
Petrobras has been working with the Ministry of Mines and Energy MME and Secretary of the
National Treasury STN in order to resolve remaining issues necessary to conclude the
settlement process. |
F-43
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
11. |
|
Petroleum and Alcohol Account Receivable from Federal Government (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Settlement of the Petroleum and Alcohol Accounts with the Federal Government (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The remaining balance of the Petroleum and Alcohol account may be paid as follows: (1)
National Treasury Bonds issued at the same amount as the final balance of the Petroleum and
Alcohol account; (2) offset of the balance of the Petroleum and Alcohol account, with any
other amount owed by Petrobras to the Federal Government, including taxes; or (3) by a
combination of the above options. |
|
(a) |
|
Short-term debt |
|
|
|
|
The Companys short-term borrowings are principally sourced from commercial banks and include
import and export financing denominated in United States dollars, as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Import oil and equipment |
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
Working capital |
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
610 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,293 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted average annual interest rates on outstanding short-term borrowings were
4.68% and 4.09% at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
F-44
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
12. |
|
Financings (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes |
|
|
4,217 |
|
|
|
5,871 |
|
Financial institutions |
|
|
3,550 |
|
|
|
3,215 |
|
Sale of future receivables |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
1,241 |
|
Suppliers credits |
|
|
1,215 |
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
Senior exchangeable notes |
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
Assets related to export program to be offset against
sales of future receivables |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(300 |
) |
Repurchased securities (1) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(356 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,823 |
|
|
|
11,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
National Economic and Social Development
Bank BNDES (state-owned company, see Note 24) |
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
Debêntures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BNDES (state-owned company, see Note 24) |
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
Other banks |
|
|
1,093 |
|
|
|
935 |
|
Others |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,793 |
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
12,616 |
|
|
|
12,931 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
(2,106 |
) |
|
|
(1,428 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,510 |
|
|
|
11,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had amounts invested abroad in an
exclusive investment fund that held debt securities of some of the Petrobras group
companies and some of the SPEs that the Company consolidates according to FIN 46(R), in
the total amount of US$245 (US$2,078 in 2005). These securities are considered to be
extinguished, and thus the related amounts, together with applicable interest have been
removed from the presentation of marketable securities and long-term debt, of US$19
(US$356 in 2005), and project financings, of US$226 (US$1,722 in 2005), respectively. (see
also Note 14). Gains and losses on the extinguishment are recognized as incurred.
Subsequent reissuances of notes at amounts greater or lower than are recorded as premium
or discounts and are amortized over the life of the notes. Petrobras incurred in expenses
in the total amount of US$160 on the extinguishment of debt during 2006 and US$17 during
2005. As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had an outstanding balance of net
premiums on reissuance that amounted to US$45 and US$56, respectively. |
F-45
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
12. |
|
Financings (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Long-term debt (Continued) |
|
|
|
Composition of foreign currency denominated debt by currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Currencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States dollars |
|
|
8,928 |
|
|
|
10,679 |
|
Japanese Yen |
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
Euro |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
Others |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,823 |
|
|
|
11,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities of the principal of long-term debt |
The long-term portion at December 31, 2006 becomes due in the following years:
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
1,466 |
|
2009 |
|
|
799 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,543 |
|
2011 |
|
|
810 |
|
2012 |
|
|
1,788 |
|
2013 and thereafter |
|
|
4,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Composition of long-term debt by annual interest rate |
|
|
|
|
Interest rates on long-term debt were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Foreign currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6% or less |
|
|
2,373 |
|
|
|
3,686 |
|
Over 6% to 8% |
|
|
3,805 |
|
|
|
2,603 |
|
Over 8% to 10% |
|
|
3,321 |
|
|
|
4,491 |
|
Over 10% to 15% |
|
|
324 |
|
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,823 |
|
|
|
11,350 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local currency |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6% or less |
|
|
470 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Over 6% to 8% |
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
266 |
|
Over 8% to 10% |
|
|
858 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
Over 10% to 15% |
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,793 |
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,616 |
|
|
|
12,931 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-46
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
12. |
|
Financings (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Long-term debt (Continued) |
|
|
|
Structured finance of exports |
|
|
|
|
Petrobras and Petrobras Finance Ltd. PFL have certain contracts (Master Export Contract and
Prepayment Agreement) between themselves and a special purpose entity not related to
Petrobras, PF Export Receivables Master Trust (PF Export), relating to the prepayment of
export receivables to be generated by PFL by means of sales on the international market of
fuel oil and other products acquired from Petrobras. |
|
|
|
|
As stipulated in the contracts, PFL assigned the rights to future receivables in the amount
of US$1,800 (1st and 2nd tranches) to PF Export, which, in turn, issued
and delivered to PFL the following securities, also in the amount of US$1,800: |
|
|
|
US$1,500 in Senior Trust Certificates, which were negotiated by PFL on the
international market at face value. The amount was transferred to Petrobras as
prepayment for exports to be made to PFL, according to the prepayment agreement. |
|
|
|
|
US$300 in Junior Trust Certificates, which are held in the portfolio of PFL. If PF
Export incurs any losses on the receipt of the value of the exports transferred by PFL,
these losses will be compensated by the Junior Trust Certificates. |
|
|
|
The assignment of rights to future export receivables represents a liability of PFL, which
will be settled by the transfer of the receivables to PF Export as and when they are
generated. This liability will bear interest on the same basis as the Senior and Junior Trust
Certificates, as described above. The Junior Trust Certificates form a 20% guarantee to the
Senior Trust Certificates. |
|
|
|
|
On September, 2005 Petrobras prepaid an amount of US$330 to PETROBRAS FINANCE LTD. PFL
respective to the export prepayments. Subsequent, PETROBRAS FINANCE LTD. PFL paid on
September 1, 2005 an equal amount related to the Senior Trust Certificates series A2 and C
with floating rates, issued by PF Export, maturing on 2010 and 2013, respectively. |
F-47
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
12. |
|
Financings (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Long-term debt (Continued) |
|
|
|
Structured finance of exports (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
On March 1, 2006 Petrobras prepaid US$334 to PETROBRAS FINANCE LTD. PFL respective to the
export prepayments. Subsequent, PETROBRAS FINANCE LTD. PFL paid on March 1, 2006 an equal
amount related to the Senior Trust Certificates series A1 and B with fixed rates, issued by
PF Export, maturing in 2010 and 2011, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
On May 26, 2006, PFL has successfully completed a solicitation of consents from holders of
the Series 2003-A 6.4% Senior Trust Certificates due 2015 issued by PF Export Receivables
Master Trust. The amendments sought to eliminate exports of bunker fuel from the transaction
so that the securities have been collateralized only by receivables from sales of fuel oil
exported by Petrobras and to reduce the minimum average daily gross exports of fuel oil for
any rolling twelve-month period. PFL also obtained the consent from the holders of Series
2003-B 3.75% due 2013. The amendments became effective on June 1, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
As a result of these amendments, the premium rate of the guarantee of the Series 2003-B was
reduced from 1.8% to 1.1%. |
|
|
|
GASENE Project, Urucu-Coari-Manaus gas pipeline project and Urucu-Coari liquefied
petroleum gas line project |
|
|
|
|
On December 5, 2005, Petrobras obtained a bridge loan from the National Bank for Economic and
Social Development (BNDES), in the amount of US$342, for the special purpose company
Transportadora GASENE S.A., responsible for the project aimed at interconnecting the
Southeastern and Northeastern gas pipeline networksGASENE, and US$342 for the special purpose
company Transportadora Urucu Manaus S.A. proceeding with the financial structuring of the
projects Urucu-Coari-Manaus gas pipeline and the Urucu-Coari liquefied petroleum gas (LPG)
line. |
F-48
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
12. |
|
Financings (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Long-term debt (Continued) |
|
|
|
Financing for P-51 and P-52 platforms |
|
|
|
|
On November 25, 2004, the Board of Directors of Petrobras approved the execution of a contract
in the amount of up to US$379 between the National Bank for Economic and Social Development
(BNDES) and the wholly-owned subsidiary PETROBRAS NETHERLANDS B.V. PNBV for the financing of
Brazilian assets and services to be used in the construction of the P-52 production platform. |
|
|
|
|
The amount is provided by BNDES within the BNDES-Exim post-shipment program, under the buyer
credit standards, which includes financing no other than Brazilian national goods and services
within the investment. The financing will be amortized over a 10-year period after conclusion
of the platform construction work, expected for May 2007. The interest rate is 36-month LIBOR
plus 2% during the grace period and the 60-month LIBOR plus 2% thereafter. |
|
|
|
|
On December 17, 2004, PETROBRAS NETHERLANDS B.V. PNBV, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Petrobras, entered into a credit facility of US$280 for financing of the construction of
platforms P-51 and P-52. This loan is guaranted by export credit agencies of Norway, United
Kingdon and Italy. The Agreement states either a floating rate (Libor plus 0.6%) or a fixed
interest rate (4.86%). |
|
|
|
|
On November 17, 2004, PETROBRAS NETHERLANDS B.V. PNBV, a wholly-owned subsidiary of
Petrobras, entered into a additional Commercial Loan Facility Agreement with BNP Paribas to
grant to PETROBRAS NETHERLANDS B.V. PNBV a credit facility of US$100 for financing of the
construction of platforms P-51 and P-52. The agreement states a floating interest rate of
Libor plus 1.4%. |
F-49
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
12. |
|
Financings (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Long-term debt (Continued) |
|
|
|
Global Notes |
|
|
|
|
On October 06, 2006, PIFCo issued Global Notes to the amount of US$500. The notes have an
effective rate of 6.185% per annum and a ten-year term. This is the lowest borrowing cost for
PIFCo over this term and represented a rate of 1.55% over and above the US T-bond for a
similar term. The Global Notes were offered at 99.557% of the face value with a stated of
6.125% per annum. PIFCo used the proceeds from this issuance principally to repay
trade-related debt. |
|
(c) |
|
Debt repurchase offer (Tender) of notes |
|
|
|
|
On July 24, 2006, (PIFCo), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, concluded its debt
repurchase offer (Tender) announced on July 18, 2006. The amount of notes tendered for five
series of notes was US$888. The repurchased securities related to 2006 amount to US$1,046.
Including the notes previously repurchased by the Company and its affiliates, also included in
the tender, the total value reached US$1,215. The purpose of this initiative was to reduce
total debt outstanding and simplify the debt profile, thus benefiting from the Companys
current strong cash generation. The transaction was settled on July 27, 2006 and all the notes
tendered were canceled from this date. Upon conclusion of the Tender PIFCo incurred expenses in
the total amount of US$160. |
|
|
(d) |
|
Debentures issue |
|
|
|
|
On August 02, 2006 the Extraordinary General Meeting held by ALBERTO PASQUALINI REFAP S.A., a
subsidiary of the Company, approved the value of the private issue of simple, nominative and
book-entered debentures in the amount of US$391. The debentures are being issued in order to
expand and modernize REFAPs industrial facilities and to raise its oil processing capacity
from 20,000 m3/day to 30,000 m3/day, in addition to increasing the portion of national oils
being processed. |
F-50
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
12. |
|
Financings (Continued) |
|
(d) |
|
Debentures issue (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The issue was be made under the following terms up to December 30, 2006 and amortization over
96 months plus a 6-month grace period; 90% of the debentures shall be subscribed by the BNDES
yielding interest at the Long-term Interest Rate +3.8% p.a.; 10% of the debentures shall be
subscribed by BNDES Participações S.A. (BNDESPAR) at the interest rate of the BNDES basket of
currencies + 2.3% p.a.. |
|
|
|
|
On September 08, 2006, the Financing Contract was executed and the first installment was made
available in the amount of US$278. On December 19, 2006 was made available the remaining amount
of US$113. |
|
|
(e) |
|
Japanese Yen Bonds |
|
|
|
|
On September 27, 2006, PIFCo concluded a private placement of securities in the Japanese
capital market (Shibosai) for a total of ¥ 35 billion (US$298) due September 2016. The issue
was a private placement in Japanese market with a partial guarantee of Japan Bank for
International Cooperation (JBIC) and bears interest at the rate of 2.15% per annum, payable
semiannually. In the same date, PIFCo entered into a swap agreement with Citibank, swapping
the total amount of this debt to a U.S. dollar denominated debt. PIFCo used the proceeds
principally to finance PNBV, an affiliate, for construction of lines interconnecting the P-51,
P-52 and P-53 production platforms to the PRA-1 autonomous repumping unit. See note 20(e). |
|
|
(f) |
|
Guarantees and covenants |
|
|
|
|
Financial institutions abroad do not require guarantees from the Company. The financing
granted by BNDES National Bank for Social and Economic Development is guaranteed by a lien
on the assets being financed. |
F-51
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
12. |
|
Financings (Continued) |
|
(f) |
|
Guarantees and covenants (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The Companys debt agreements contain affirmative covenants regarding, among other things,
provision of information; financial reporting; conduct of business; maintenance of corporate
existence; maintenance of government approvals; compliance with applicable laws; maintenance of
books and records; maintenance of insurance; payment of taxes and claims; and notice of certain
events. The Companys debt agreements also contain negative covenants, including, without
limitation, limitations on the incurrence of indebtedness; limitations on the incurrence of
liens; limitations on transactions with affiliates; limitations on the disposition of assets;
limitation on consolidations, mergers, sales and/or conveyances; negative pledge restrictions;
change in ownership limitations; ranking; use of proceeds limitations; and required receivables
coverages. Petrobras management affirms that the Company is in compliance with the covenants
within debt agreements. |
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, GASPETRO had secured certain debentures issued to finance the
purchase of the transportation rights in the Bolivia/Brazil pipeline with 3,000 shares of its
interest in TBG, a subsidiary of GASPETRO responsible for the operation of the pipeline. |
|
|
|
|
The Federal Government guarantees TBGs Multilateral Credit Agency debt, which had an
outstanding balance of US$367 and US$402 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. During
2000, the Federal Government, the Company, TBG, PETROQUISA and Banco do Brasil S.A. entered
into an agreement whereby the revenues of TBG will serve as a counter-guarantee to this debt
until the debt has been extinguished. |
|
|
|
|
Petrobras entered into standby purchase agreements in support of the obligations of its
wholly-owned subsidiary, PIFCo, under the note issuances in 2001, 2002 and 2003 and their
respective indentures. Petrobras has the obligation to purchase from the noteholders any
unpaid amounts of principal, interest or other amounts due under the notes and the indenture
applies, subject to certain limitations, irrespective of whether any such amounts are due at
maturity of the notes or otherwise. |
F-52
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
12. |
|
Financings (Continued) |
|
(g) |
|
Lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had fully utilized all available lines of credit
for the purchase of imports. Outstanding lines of credit at December 31, 2006 and 2005 were
US$1,370 and US$1,688, respectively. Lines of credit are included in short-term debt and
long-term debt. |
13. |
|
Financial Income (Expenses), Net |
|
|
|
Financial expenses, financial income and monetary and exchange variation on monetary assets and
liabilities, net, allocated to income for the years ended at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
are shown as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Financial expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and financings |
|
|
(1,076 |
) |
|
|
(1,135 |
) |
|
|
(1,055 |
) |
Capitalized interest |
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
612 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
Leasing |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
Project financings |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(316 |
) |
Losses on derivative instruments |
|
|
(481 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
) |
|
|
(233 |
) |
Repurchased securities losses |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(137 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
(165 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,340 |
) |
|
|
(1,189 |
) |
|
|
(1,733 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
566 |
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
199 |
|
Customers |
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Government securities |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Advances to suppliers |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
Gain on fair value hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
553 |
|
Other |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,165 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Monetary and exchange variation on
monetary assets and liabilities,
net |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-53
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
14. |
|
Project Financings |
|
|
|
Since 1997, the Company has utilized project financings to provide capital for the continued
development of the Companys exploration and production and related projects. |
|
|
|
The special purpose entities associated with the project finance projects are consolidated based
on FIN 46(R) and the project financing obligation represents the debt of the consolidated SPEs
with the third-party lender. |
|
|
|
The Companys responsibility under these contracts is to complete the development of the oil and
gas fields, operate the fields, pay for all operating expenses related to the projects and remit
a portion of the net proceeds generated from the fields to fund the special purpose companies
debt and return on equity payments. At the conclusion of the term of each financing project, the
Company will have the option to purchase the leased or transferred assets from the consolidated
special purpose company. |
|
|
|
The following summarizes the liabilities related to the projects that were in progress at
December 31, 2006 and 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Barracuda/Caratinga |
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
2,435 |
|
Charter Development CDC (1) |
|
|
876 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
Cabiúnas |
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
799 |
|
PDET Offshore S.A. |
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
188 |
|
Transportadora Gasene |
|
|
617 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
Nova Transportadora do Sudeste NTS (2) |
|
|
543 |
|
|
|
461 |
|
Nova Transportadora do Nordeste NTN (2) |
|
|
449 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
Codajás (3) |
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
215 |
|
Espadarte/Voador/Marimbá (EVM) |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
Companhia Locadora de Equipamentos Petrolíferos CLEP |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
1,700 |
|
Cia. de Desenvolvimento e Modernização de Plantas Industriais CDMPI |
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nova Marlim |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
286 |
|
Cia Petrolífera Marlim |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Albacora |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Pargo, Carapeba, Garoupa and Cherne (PCGC) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Fundo de Investimemento Imobiliário FII (4) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
85 |
|
Repurchased securities (5) |
|
|
(226 |
) |
|
|
(1,722 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,374 |
|
|
|
6,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of project financings |
|
|
(2,182 |
) |
|
|
(2,413 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,192 |
|
|
|
3,629 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-54
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
14. |
|
Project Financings (Continued) |
|
(1) |
|
Charter Development CDC is responsible for Marlim Leste (P-53 project). |
|
|
(2) |
|
Nova Transportadora do Sudeste NTS and Nova Transportadora do Nordeste NTN take part
in the consortium responsible for Malhas Project. |
|
|
(3) |
|
Codajás consolidates Transportadora Urucu Manaus S.A. which is responsible for the
Amazonia Project. |
|
|
(4) |
|
Investment Fund for Fixed Assets FII is responsible for Certified Receipts of
Acceptance of Fixed Assets CRI Macaé Project. |
|
|
(5) |
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had amounts invested abroad in an exclusive
investment fund. These securities are considered to be extinguished, and thus the related
amounts, together with applicable interest have been removed from the presentation of
marketable securities and project financings (see also Note 5). |
|
|
The Company has received certain advances amounting to US$376 which are recorded as project
financings obligations and are related to assets under agreements with investors, which are
included to the property, plant and equipment balance. Such asset and obligation amounts are
presented gross as the obligation can only be settled through delivery of the fully constructed
asset. |
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006, the long-term portion of project financings becomes due in the
following years: |
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
1,252 |
2009 |
|
|
993 |
2010 |
|
|
666 |
2011 |
|
|
401 |
2012 |
|
|
158 |
2013 and thereafter |
|
|
722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, the amounts of cash outlay commitments assumed related to consolidated
structured project financings are presented as follows: |
|
|
|
|
Cia. de Desenvolvimento e Modernização de Plantas Industriais CDMPI |
|
|
733 |
Transportadora Gasene |
|
|
601 |
PDET Offshore S.A. |
|
|
378 |
Charter Development CDC |
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,936 |
|
|
|
|
F-55
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
14. |
|
Project Financings (Continued) |
|
|
|
The following summarizes the projects, their purposes, the guarantees and estimated investments
of each project: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated |
Project |
|
Purpose |
|
Main guarantees |
|
investments |
Barracuda/ Caratinga
|
|
To allow
development of
production in the
fields of Barracuda
and Caratinga in
the Campos Basin
the SPC Barracuda
and Caratinga
Leasing Company
B.V. (BCLC), is in
charge of building
all of the assets
(wells, submarine
equipment and
production units)
required by the
project and is also
the owner of them.
|
|
Guarantee provided by
Brasoil to cover BCLCs
financial requirements.
|
|
US$3,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CLEP
|
|
Companhia Locadora
de Equipamentos
Petrolíferos CLEP
furnishes assets
related to oil
production located
in the Campos Basin
through a lease
agreement for the
period of 10 years,
and at the end of
which period
Petrobras will have
the right to buy
shares of the SPC
or project assets.
|
|
Lease prepayments in case
revenue is not sufficient
to cover payables to the
lenders.
|
|
US$1,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cabiúnas
|
|
Project with the
objective of
increasing gas
production
transportation from
the Campos Basin.
Cayman Cabiunas
Investment Co. Ltd.
(CCIC), supplies
assets to Petrobras
under an
international lease
agreement.
|
|
Pledge of 10.4 billion
m3 of gas.
|
|
US$850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Malhas Project (NTN / NTS)
|
|
Consortium between
TRANSPETRO,
Transportadora
Nordeste Sudeste
(TNS), Nova
Transportadora do
Sudeste (NTS) and
Nova Transportadora
do Nordeste (NTN).
NTS and NTN supply
assets related to
natural gas
transportation. TNS
(a 100% GASPETRO
company) supplies
assets that have
already been
previously set up.
TRANSPETRO is the
gas pipes operator.
|
|
Prepayments based on
transportation capacity
to cover any consortium
cash insufficiencies
|
|
US$1,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EVM
|
|
Project with the
objective of
allowing set up of
submarine oil
production
equipment in the
fields Espadarte,
Voador, Marimbá and
other seven smaller
fields in the
Campos Basin. EVM
Leasing Co.
(EVMLC), supplies
assets to Petrobras
under an
international lease
agreement.
|
|
Pledge of certain oil
volumes.
|
|
US$1,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NovaMarlim
|
|
Consortium with
NovaMarlim Petróleo
S.A. (NovaMarlim)
which supplies
submarine oil
production
equipment and
refunds Petrobras
for operating costs
resulting from the
operation and
maintenance of
field assets.
|
|
30% of the field
production limited to 720
days.
|
|
US$933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PDET
|
|
PDET Offshore S.A. is the future
owner of the Project assets whose objective is that of improving the
infrastructure to transfer oil produced in the Campos Basin to the
oil refineries in the Southeast Region and export. The assets will be
later leased to Petrobras for 12 years.
|
|
All of the projects assets
will be pledged as collateral.
|
|
US$1,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marlim
|
|
Consortium between Companhia
Petrolífera Marlim (CPM), which furnishes to Petrobras submarine
equipment for oil production of the Marlim
field.
|
|
70% of the field
production limited to 720
days.
|
|
US$1,500 |
F-56
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
14. |
|
Project Financings (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated |
Project |
|
Purpose |
|
Main guarantees |
|
investments |
Albacora
|
|
Consortium between
Petrobras and
Albacora Japão
Petróleo Ltda.
(AJPL), which
furnishes to
Petrobras oil
production assets
of the Albacora
field in the Campos
Basin.
|
|
Pledge of assets
|
|
US$170 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Albacora/ PETROS
|
|
Consortium between
Petrobras and
Fundação PETROS de
Seguridade Social,
which furnishes to
Petrobras oil
production assets
of the Albacora
field in the Campos
Basin.
|
|
Pledge of assets
|
|
US$240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PCGC
|
|
Companhia de
Recuperação
Secundária (CRSec)
supplies assets to
be used by
Petrobras in the
fields Pargo,
Carapeba, Garoupa,
Cherne and others
through a lease
agreement with
monthly payments.
|
|
Additional lease
payment if revenue
is not sufficient
to cover payables
to lenders.
|
|
US$134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marlim Leste (P-53) Project (CDC)
|
|
To develop
production in the
Marlim Leste field,
Petrobras will use
Floating Production
Unit P-53, to be
chartered from
Charter Development
LLC, a company
incorporated in the
state of Delaware,
U.S.A. The Bare
Boat Charter
agreement will be
effective for a
15-year period
counted from the
date of signature.
|
|
Completion: the flow of charter
payments to be made by Petrobras
will begin at a certain date.
Cost Overrun: Any increase in P-53
construction costs will represent
an increase in charter amounts
payable by Petrobras.
|
|
US$1,180 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amazônia (Codajás)
|
|
Construction of a
gas pipeline with
length of 385 km,
between Coari and
Manaus, and a GLP
pipeline with
length of 285 Km
between Urucu and
Coari, both under
the responsibility
of Transportadora
Urucu Manaus S.A.
and the
construction of a
thermoelectric
plant, in Manaus,
with capacity of
488 MW through
Companhia de
Geração
Termelétrica
Manauara S.A.
|
|
Being negotiated
|
|
US$1,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GASENE
|
|
Transportadora
Gasene S.A. is
responsible for the
construction and
future ownership of
pipelines to
transport natural
gas with a total
length of 1.4
thousand km and
transportation
capacity of 20
million cubic
meters per day,
connecting the
Cabiúnas Terminal
in Rio de Janeiro
to the city of
Catu, in Bahia
state.
|
|
To be defined.
|
|
US$2,000 |
F-57
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
14. |
|
Project Financings (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total estimated |
Project |
|
Purpose |
|
Main guarantees |
|
investments |
CDMPI
(modernization of
REVAP)
|
|
This project has
the objective of
raising the
Henrique Lage
(REVAP) refinerys
national heavy oil
processing
capacity, bringing
the diesel it
produces into line
with the new
national
specifications and
reducing pollution
levels. To achieve
this, the SPE Cia.
de Desenvolvimento
e Modernização de
Plantas Industriais
- CDMPI was
founded, which
shall construct and
lease to Petrobras
a Retarded Coking
plant, a Coke
Naphtha
Hydrotreatment
plant and related
plants to be
installed at this
refinery.
|
|
Prepaid rental to
cover any cash
deficiencies of
CDMPI.
|
|
US$900 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexilhão
|
|
Construction of a
platform (PMXL-1)
to produce natural
gas at Campos de
Mexilhão and Cedro,
located in the
Bacia de Santos,
State of São Paulo,
which shall be held
by Companhia
Mexilhão do Brasil
(CMB), responsible
for obtaining the
funds necessary to
build such
platform. After
building the PMXL-1
shall be leased to
Petrobras, holder
of the exploration
and production
concession in the
aforementioned
fields
|
|
To be defined
|
|
US$595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
P-55 and P-57
|
|
To develop
production at
Module 3 in the
Roncador field
(P-55) and Phase 2
of Jubarte field
(P-57). A Deepwater
charter LLC and a
Deepblue Charter
LLC are responsible
for jointly
contracting four
SPCs to build the
UEP: one for the
P-55 hull, another
for the P-57 hull,
as well as two
other for
Generation and
Compression Modules
for both UEPs. At
the end, PNBV shall
charter the P-55
from Deepwater and
the P-57 from
Deepblue and will
sub-charter them to
Petrobras.
Undergoing
selection process
for the SPCs (IDB
with interaction).
|
|
Future chartering
commitment of
Petrobras with PNBV
and PNBV with the
owner of UEP
(Deepwater and
Deepblue).
|
|
US$1,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Termobahia
|
|
Acquisition of 49%
of the interest
held by
ABB-EV-Equity
Venture (ABB-EV) in
TERMOBAHIA,
comprised of shares
and credits via the
financial
structuring agreed
with the
Interamerican
Development Bank.
An SPE was
structured called
BLADE Securities
Ltd (BLADE),
headquartered in
Ireland, which
shall be the
successor of the
rights held by
ABB-EV until
Petrobras presents
a strategic
partner.
|
|
None given.
|
|
US$39.6 |
F-58
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
14. |
|
Project Financings (Continued) |
|
|
|
Blade Securities Limited |
|
|
|
The Special Purpose Company (SPC) BLADE Securities Ltd (BLADE), was created by the Deutsche
Bank (DB), in order to support Petrobras in its transactions related to the acquisition of a 49%
interest held by ABB-EV in TERMOBAHIA power plant. (See Note 18 (h)). The financial structuring
involves two simultaneous operations: the acquisition of ABB-EVs rights and the sale of such
rights to a private institution, DB, until a strategic partner is introduced by Petrobras within
a maximum period of one year. |
|
|
|
Under the agreements, PIFCo paid to Blade US$1, and in return, Blade transferred to PIFCo the
right to any dividends to be received from TERMOBAHIA and the rights to the shares of TERMOBAHIA
either for PIFCo or a Petrobras subsidiary. Additionally, PIFCo paid to Blade US$38, and in
return, Blade transferred to PIFCo any amounts received from TERMOBAHIA related to the
subordinated loan recorded as notes receivable, which has an interest rate of 8% p.a. and an
expiry date of 2023, and the right to the loans receivable for PIFCo or a Petrobras subsidiary.
(See Note 18(h)). |
|
|
|
As a result of the trasaction series, Petrobras recognized a US$4 gain on debt extinguishment on
December 31, 2005, related to the fact it will no longer be paying 18.79% interest to a third
party lender. Due to immateriality, the Company has not applied step acquisition accounting to
the purchase of the interest in TERMOBAHIA. |
15. |
|
Capital Lease Obligations |
|
|
|
The Company leases certain offshore platforms and vessels, which are accounted for as capital leases. At December 31, 2006, assets under capital leases had a net book value of US$1,338 (US$1,419 at December 31, 2005). |
F-59
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
15. |
|
Capital Lease Obligations (Continued) |
|
|
|
The following is a schedule by year of the future minimum lease payments at December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
300 |
|
2008 |
|
|
313 |
|
2009 |
|
|
284 |
|
2010 |
|
|
230 |
|
2011 |
|
|
112 |
|
2012 |
|
|
62 |
|
2013 and thereafter |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated future lease payments |
|
|
1,337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less amount representing interest at 6.2% to 12.0% annual |
|
|
(282 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of minimum lease payments |
|
|
1,055 |
|
Less current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term portion of capital lease obligations |
|
|
824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16. |
|
Employees Post-retirement Benefits and Other Benefits |
|
(a) |
|
Employees post-retirement benefits balances |
|
|
|
|
The balances related to Employees Post-retirement Benefits are represented as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health |
|
|
|
|
|
Health |
|
|
Pension |
|
care |
|
Pension |
|
care |
|
|
benefits |
|
benefits |
|
benefits |
|
benefits |
Current liabilities |
|
|
198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
4,645 |
|
|
|
5,433 |
|
|
|
3,627 |
|
|
|
3,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees post-retirement projected
benefit obligation |
|
|
4,843 |
|
|
|
5,433 |
|
|
|
3,833 |
|
|
|
3,004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income |
|
|
3,110 |
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
2,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax effect |
|
|
(1,058 |
) |
|
|
(508 |
) |
|
|
(1,011 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net balance recorded in shareholders equity |
|
|
2,052 |
|
|
|
987 |
|
|
|
1,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
F-60
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
16. |
|
Employees Post-retirement Benefits and Other Benefits (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Pension plan Fundação Petrobras de Seguridade Social PETROS |
|
|
|
|
The Fundação Petrobras de Seguridade Social (PETROS) was established by Petrobras as a
private, legally separate nonprofit pension entity with administrative and financial autonomy.
As such, PETROS has the following principle objectives: |
|
(i) |
|
institute, manage and execute benefit plans for the companies or entities with which
it has signed agreements; |
|
|
(ii) |
|
provide administration and execution services for benefit plans focused on
post-retirement payments; and |
|
|
(iii) |
|
promote the well-being of its members, especially with respect to post-retirement
payments. |
|
|
|
The PETROS plan is a contributory defined-benefit pension plan introduced by Petrobras in July
of 1970, to supplement the social security pension benefits of employees of Petrobras and its
Brazilian subsidiaries and affiliated companies. In order to fund its objectives, PETROS
receives monthly contributions from the sponsoring companies of the PETROS Plan amounting to
12.93% of the salaries of participants in the plan. Additionally PETROS is funded by income
resulting from the investment of these contributions. The Companys funding policy is to
contribute to the plan annually the amount determined by actuarial calculations. In the
calendar 2006 year, benefits paid totaled US$713 (US$570 in 2005). |
|
|
|
|
The Companys liability related to future benefits to plan participants is calculated on an
annual basis by an independent actuary, based on the Projected Unit Credit method. The assets
that guarantee the pension plan are presented as a reduction to the net actuarial liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
The actuarial gains and losses generated by the differences between the values of the
obligation and assets determined based on projections and the actual figures, are respectively
included or excluded from the calculation of the net actuarial liability and recorded as
Postretirements benefit reserves adjustments net of tax pension cost, in shareholders
equity. Actuarial gains and losses are amortized during the average remaining service period
of the active employees of approximately 10 years at December 31, 2006, in accordance with the
procedure established by SFAS 87. |
|
|
|
The relation between contributions by the sponsors and participants of the PETROS Plan,
considering only those attributable to the Company and subsidiaries in the 2006 and 2005
financial years, was 1.00 to 1.00. The Companys best estimate of contributions expected to be
paid in 2007 respective to the pension plan approximates US$194, with total pension benefit
payments in 2007 expected to be US$830. |
|
|
|
|
According to Constitutional Amendment No. 20, the computation of any deficit in the
defined-benefit plan in accordance with the actuarial method of the current plan (which
differs from the method defined in SFAS 87), must be equally shared between the sponsor and
the participants, by an adjustment to the normal contributions. |
|
|
|
|
The PETROS Plan is closed to new employees of the Petrobras system joining from September 2002
and the Company contracted a group life insurance policy to cover employees commencing
employment with the Company subsequent to closure of the of the PETROS plan; this policy will
remain in effect until a new private pension plan is implemented. |
|
|
|
|
Plan assets |
|
|
|
|
Plan assets are invested primarily in government securities, investment funds, equity
instruments and properties. |
F-61
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
16. |
|
Employees Post-retirement Benefits and Other Benefits (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Pension plan Fundação Petrobras de Seguridade Social PETROS (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The table below describes the types of plan assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Government securities |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
Investments funds |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
Equity instruments |
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
Other |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan assets include the following securities of related parties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Petrobras common shares |
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
Petrobras preferred shares |
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
Government controlled companies |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Government securities |
|
|
4,952 |
|
|
|
3,899 |
|
Securities of other related parties |
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,910 |
|
|
|
4,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PETROS provided certain financing for the continued development of the Albacora oil and gas
field located in the Campos basin, that is classified as securities of other related parties
(see Note 14). |
F-62
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
16. |
|
Employees Post-retirement Benefits and Other Benefits (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Pension plan Fundação Petrobras de Seguridade Social PETROS (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Plan assets (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The Company uses 6.19% as the expected long-term rate of return over inflation on PETROS
assets. The PETROS portfolio of investments as of December 31, 2006 was comprised of 71%
securities, 44% of which were held-to-maturity government securities that earn interest at 6%
annually plus the IPCA (Consumer Price Index) variation and 27% of which were Investments Funds
that earn interest approximate to the CDI (Certificado de Depósito Interbancário, or Interbank
Deposit Certificate), which has been yielding more than 6% annually. Thus, the Company
considers a 6.19% long term interest rate appropriate to calculate the expected return on
assets, as such aligns with the composition of the PETROS asset portfolio. |
|
|
|
|
PETROS has a significant volume of investments in government securities, mainly NTN-B bonds,
which by an agreement with the Supplementary Social Security Department will be
held-to-maturity being recorded at fair value, for which a net present adjustment was required.
Thus, the percentage of assets allocated in this investment will remain the same over the short
term. |
|
|
|
|
New benefits plan |
|
|
|
|
In May of 2001, the Board of Directors of Petrobras approved the creation of a mixed social
security plan, for current and new employees, based on defined contribution formula for
programmable benefits and a defined benefit formula for risk benefits. However, the migration
of participants and beneficiaries of the previous plan (PETROS) to the new plan was suspended,
pursuant to a Federal Judicial ruling arising from an injunction filed by the employee union. A
court order in 2004 granted the injunction ruling against the new plan and invalidating any
changes to the PETROS plan premised upon intended migration to a new plan. This court decision
is under appeal. |
|
|
|
|
In 2003, the Company formed a task force with representatives of the National Union of Oil
Workers (FUP), unions and PETROS, among others, in order to evaluate alternatives to a new
model for the Companys supplementary pension plan, including analyses of negotiated
arrangements for the settlement of actuarial deficits. |
F-63
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
16. |
|
Employees Post-retirement Benefits and Other Benefits (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Pension plan Fundação Petrobras de Seguridade Social PETROS (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
New benefits plan (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
On April 19, 2006, the Company, aiming to achieve an agreement regarding its Supplementary
Pension Plan, presented to employee participants and retirees a proposal to bring equilibrium
to the actual PETROS Plan and the implementation of a new plan, denominated PETROS Plan 2. |
|
|
|
|
Execution of the proposal presented by the Companys Executive Board was subject to a number of
conditions, including the renegotiation of the PETROS Plan Regulations, in relation to the
means of readjusting the benefits and pensions, considering a significant rate of individual
accession of employees and dependants. |
|
|
|
|
The overall renegotiation target previously set by the Company had not been achieved. As a
result the proposal presented by Petrobras became null and void. |
|
|
|
|
On January 08, 2007, the Petrobras Board of Directors approved the reopening of the PETROS Plan
renegotiation process, in order to meet the claims of the trade unions, as most participants
were in favor of the renegotiation. |
|
|
|
|
The new target for the minimum accession number to the renegotiation was set at 2/3
(two-thirds) of the members and the final deadline for them to make their choice was February
28, 2007. The renegotiation target was met and the proposal submitted by the Company became
effective, and PETROS is calculating the amounts to be funded by the sponsors, that will reduce
the deficit of the PETROS Plan, as established by Brazilian pension law. |
|
|
|
|
On October 20, 2006, the Board of Directors of Petrobras approved the introduction of PETROS
Plan 2 for employees currently with no pension plan. |
|
|
|
|
The New Supplementary pension plan was formulated according to the Variable Contribution model.
In this model, the contributions are capitalized in individuals accounts, and the pension
benefits are established according to the account balances. This plan also includes risk
benefits with coverage for illness, incapacity and death, and a lifetime income. |
F-64
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
16. |
|
Employees Post-retirement Benefits and Other Benefits (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Pension plan Fundação Petrobras de Seguridade Social PETROS (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
New benefits plan (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The PETROS Plan 2 also includes a minimum benefit for payment of annuities which guarantees
coverage of the benefit to ensure it does not have a monetary value of under 30% of the average
contribution salary. |
|
|
|
|
On December 20, 2006 the Department for Coordinating and Controlling State Companies (DEST)
decided to approve the proposed PETROS Plan 2, which was also approved on January 05, 2007 by
the Ministry of Mines and Energy. |
|
|
|
|
On January 19, 2007, the PETROS Decision-making Board approved the PETROS Plan 2, which will be
referred for assessment and statement by the Supplementary Pensions Office SPC, for the proper
final approval, whereupon it may be offered to the employees who are not presently covered by a
supplementary pension plan sponsored by the Company. |
|
|
|
|
Petrobras and the other sponsors will fully assume the contributions corresponding to the period
in which the new participants had no plan. This past service shall consider the period from the
date of admission to the date enrolment commenced in the PETROS Plan 2. The disbursements will
be conducted over the first months for contributions up to the total months the participant had
no plan, and shall cover the portion relating to the participants and sponsor. The maximum
estimated value of this actuarial commitment as of December 31, 2006 if the plan is approved by
SPC and accepted by all new employees was US$109. |
|
|
|
|
This New Plan also allows the Company to maintain the pension coverage it offers, mitigates the
risks presented by the defined benefit model adopted and considerably reduces the possibility of
future deficits. The impact of joining the new plan and its related benefit costs will be valued
according to the standards established in SFAS 87, 132 and 158 and will only be computed and
recognized in the accounts when the plan is implemented. |
F-65
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
16. |
|
Employees Post-retirement Benefits and Other Benefits (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Pension plan Fundação Petrobras de Seguridade Social PETROS (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
TRANSPETRO |
|
|
|
|
TRANSPETRO maintains a defined-contribution private pension scheme with PETROS called Plano
TRANSPETRO, which receives monthly contributions equivalent to 5.32% of the payroll of the
members and is equal to the contributions made by the participants. |
|
(c) |
|
PETROBRAS ENERGIA PEPSA (including PESA) |
|
|
|
|
Defined contribution plan |
|
|
|
|
Supplementary Pension Plan for Personnel |
|
|
|
|
In November 2005, the Board of Directors of Petrobras Energía approved the implementation of a
defined voluntary contributions plan which all of the Companys employees may elect to join
Petrobras Energia. Through this plan, Petrobras Energía will make contributions to a trust
equivalent to the contributions made by the employees that will subscript to the plan to a
mutual fund or AFJP, at their choice, in conformity with a scheme defined for each salary
level. The participating employees may make voluntary contributions exceeding those established
in the mentioned scheme, which will not be considered for purposes of the contributions to be
made by Petrobras Energia. |
|
|
|
|
In the fiscal years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005, Petrobras Energía recorded an expense of
US$1 and US$2, respectively, attributable to such benefits. |
F-66
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
16. |
|
Employees Post-retirement Benefits and Other Benefits (Continued) |
|
(c) |
|
PETROBRAS ENERGIA PEPSA (including PESA) (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plan |
|
|
|
|
Indemnity Plan |
|
|
|
|
This is a defined benefit plan for all the employees who fulfill certain conditions, and
consists of granting, upon retirement, a one-month salary per years of service at the Company,
in conformity with a decreasing scale considering the years of effectiveness of the plan. |
|
|
|
|
Compensating Fund |
|
|
|
|
This is a defined benefit plan for all employees of Petrobras Energía who have joined the
Company prior to May 31, 1995, and have reached a certain number of years of service. The
employee benefit is based on the last computable salary and years of service of each employee
included in the fund. |
|
|
|
|
The plan is of a supplemental nature, that is to say the benefit to the employee is represented
by the amount determined under the provisions of this plan, after deducting benefits payable to
the employee under the contribution plan and the public retirement system, in order that the
aggregate benefit to each employee equals the one stipulated in this plan. |
F-67
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
16. |
|
Employees Post-retirement Benefits and Other Benefits (Continued) |
|
(c) |
|
PETROBRAS ENERGIA PEPSA (including PESA) (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit plan (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The plan calls for a contribution to a fund exclusively by Petrobras Energía and without any
contribution by the employees, provided that they should make contributions to the retirement
system for their whole salary. As provided in Petrobras Energías By-laws, the Company makes
contributions to the fund on the basis of a Board of Directors proposal to the Shareholders
Meeting up to 1.5% of net income for each year. The assets of the fund were contributed to a
trust. The goals with respect to asset investment are: (i) the preservation of capital in US
dollars, (ii) the maintenance of high levels of liquidity, and (iii) the attainment of the
highest yields possible on a 30-days basis. For this reason, the assets are invested mainly in
bonds, corporate bonds, mutual funds, and certificates of deposits. The Bank of New York is the
trustee and Watson Wyatt is the managing agent. Should there be an excess (duly certified by an
independent actuary) of the funds under the trust agreement to be used to settle the benefits
granted by the plan, Petrobras Energía will be entitled to make a choice and use it, in which
case it would have to notify the trustee thereof. |
|
|
(d) |
|
SFAS 158 Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans |
|
|
|
|
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS 158 Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans an Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and
132(R) (SFAS 158), which became effective for the Company on December 31, 2006. This
standard requires the Company to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of each of its
defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans as an asset or liability and to
reflect changes in the funded status through Accumulated other comprehensive income, as a
separate component of shareholders equity. |
F-68
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
16. |
|
Employees Post-retirement Benefits and Other Benefits (Continued) |
|
(d) |
|
SFAS 158 Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The incremental effect of applying SFAS 158 on individual line items of the balance sheet as
of December 31, 2006 were as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-FAS 158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
with Minimum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
FAS 158 Adoption |
|
|
|
|
Adjustments |
|
Adjustments |
|
Post-FAS 158 |
Deferred taxes |
|
|
3,459 |
|
|
|
(543 |
) |
|
|
2,916 |
|
Employees post-retirement projected
benefits obligation Pension |
|
|
4,712 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
4,843 |
|
Employees post-retirement projected
benefits obligation Health care |
|
|
3,938 |
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
5,433 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive
income pension adjustments |
|
|
(1,956 |
) |
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
(2,052 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive
income health care adjustments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(987 |
) |
|
|
(987 |
) |
Total Liabilities and shareholders
equity |
|
|
98,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,680 |
|
Total shareholders equity |
|
|
45,382 |
|
|
|
(1,083 |
) |
|
|
44,299 |
|
|
(e) |
|
Health care benefits Assistência Multidisciplinar de Saúde (AMS) |
|
|
|
|
Petrobras and its Brazilian subsidiaries maintain a health care benefit plan (AMS), which
offers defined benefits and covers all employees (active and inactive) together with their
dependents. The plan is managed by the Company, with the employees contributing fixed amounts
to cover principal risks and a portion of the costs relating to other types of coverage in
accordance with participation tables defined by certain parameters including salary levels. |
|
|
|
|
The Companys commitment related to future benefits to plan participants is calculated on an
annual basis by an independent actuary, based on the Projected Unit Credit method. The health
care plan is not funded or otherwise collateralized by assets. Instead, the Company makes
benefit payments based on annual costs incurred by plan participants. |
F-69
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
16. |
|
Employees Post-retirement Benefits and Other Benefits (Continued) |
|
(e) |
|
Health care benefits Assistência Multidisciplinar de Saúde (AMS) (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Until 2006, the actuarial gains and losses generated by the differences between the values of
the obligation determined based on projections and the actual figures, were respectively
included or excluded when defining the net actuarial obligation. |
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, according to SFAS 158 (See Note 16(d)), the actuarial gains and losses
generated by the differences between the values of the obligation determined based on
projections and the actual figures, are respectively included or excluded from the calculation
of the actuarial obligation and recorded as Postretirements benefit reserves adjustments net
of tax- health care cost, as Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,in shareholders equity. |
|
|
|
|
The gains and losses recorded as Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income are amortized over the
average remaining service period of the active employees. |
|
|
|
|
Upon adoption of SFAS 158, as of December 31, 2006 the liabilities related to health care
increased by US$1,495 and shareholders equity reduced by US$987, net of income taxes. |
|
|
|
|
On December 15, 2006, Petrobras implemented the Medicine Benefit, which provides special terms
on the acquisition of certain medicines by members of the AMS from participating drugstores,
located throughout Brazil. |
|
|
|
|
Following the introduction of this benefit, the unrecognized prior service cost estimated by
independent actuary, as of December 31, 2006 was US$86, and wil be amortized over the average
remaining service period of the active employees. The unrecognized prior service cost was
included in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income and presented in Change in Benefit
Obligations, as Plan Amendments. |
|
|
|
|
For measurement purposes, a 10% annual rate of increase in the per capita cost of covered
health care benefits was assumed upon adoption of SFAS 106. The annual rate was assumed to
decrease to 4.5% from 2007 to 2036. |
F-70
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
16. |
|
Employees Post-retirement Benefits and Other Benefits (Continued) |
|
(e) |
|
Health care benefits Assistência Multidisciplinar de Saúde (AMS) (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the
post-retirement health care plans. A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost
trend rates would have the following effects: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One percentage |
|
One percentage |
|
|
point-increase |
|
point-decrease |
Effect on total of services and interest cost
component |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation |
|
|
832 |
|
|
|
(679 |
) |
LIQUIGÁS DISTRIBUIDORA S.A.
Liquigás maintains a health care benefit plan, which offers defined benefits and covers LPG
employees. At December 31, 2006, Liquigás recorded liabilities in connection with future
post-retirement health care benefit costs, in the amount of US$18 (US$16 in 2005). The plan is
managed by Liquigás and the liability related to future benefits to plan participants is
calculated on an annual basis by an independent actuary, based on the Projected Unit Credit
method, according to SFAS 106, SFAS 132 Employers Disclosures about Pensions and Other
Post-retirement Benefits an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, and 106 (SFAS 132) and
SFAS 158.
F-71
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
16. |
|
Employees Post-retirement Benefits and Other Benefits (Continued) |
|
(f) |
|
Funded status of the plans |
|
|
|
|
The funded status of the plans at December 31, 2006 and 2005, based on the report of the
independent actuary, and amounts recognized in the Companys balance sheets at those dates, are
as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health |
|
|
|
|
|
Health |
|
|
Pension |
|
Care |
|
Pension |
|
care |
|
|
Benefits |
|
Benefits |
|
Benefits |
|
Benefits |
|
|
(2) |
|
(3) |
|
(2) |
|
(3) |
Change in benefit obligation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at beginning of year |
|
|
14,422 |
|
|
|
4,974 |
|
|
|
11,509 |
|
|
|
4,025 |
|
Service cost |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
1,712 |
|
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
Actuarial loss (gain) |
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
(599 |
) |
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
Benefits paid |
|
|
(713 |
) |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
(141 |
) |
Plan amendments Medicine benefit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on translation |
|
|
1,392 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
1,595 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation at end of year (1) |
|
|
17,238 |
|
|
|
5,433 |
|
|
|
14,422 |
|
|
|
4,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year |
|
|
9,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
|
2,447 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
Companys contributions |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Employees contributions |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid |
|
|
(713 |
) |
|
|
(175 |
) |
|
|
(570 |
) |
|
|
(141 |
) |
Others |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on translation |
|
|
927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at end of year |
|
|
12,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reconciliation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status |
|
|
(4,843 |
) |
|
|
(5,433 |
) |
|
|
(5,009 |
) |
|
|
(4,974 |
) |
Unrecognized actuarial loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,117 |
|
|
|
1,970 |
|
Net amount recognized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(892 |
) |
|
|
(3,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the balance sheet consist of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees post-retirement benefits obligation |
|
|
(4,843 |
) |
|
|
(5,433 |
) |
|
|
(3,833 |
) |
|
|
(3,004 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
3,110 |
|
|
|
1,495 |
|
|
|
2,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amount recognized |
|
|
(1,733 |
) |
|
|
(3,938 |
) |
|
|
(892 |
) |
|
|
(3,004 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Projected benefit obligation, measured at December 31, 2006 and 2005. The TRANSPETRO
plan has no participants to date and the PEPSA plan is defined contribution for employees
above a specified salary level, and thus such plans have no effect on projected benefit
obligation. Thus, the projected benefit obligation disclosed above is aggregated to all
Petrobras group companies. |
|
(2) |
|
Includes PETROS (Petrobras group companies), PEPSA and PELSA pension benefits
obligations. |
|
(3) |
|
Includes AMS (Petrobras group companies) and Liquigás health care benefits
obligations. |
F-72
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
16. |
|
Employees Post-retirement Benefits and Other Benefits (Continued) |
|
(f) |
|
Funded status of the plans (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost includes the following components: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Health |
|
|
|
|
|
Health |
|
|
Pension |
|
Care |
|
Pension |
|
Care |
|
|
benefits |
|
benefits |
|
benefits |
|
benefits |
Service cost-benefits earned during the year |
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation |
|
|
1,712 |
|
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
1,381 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(1,157 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(887 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Gain on translation |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Recognized actuarial loss |
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,081 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
Employees contributions |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
948 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
960 |
|
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The main assumptions adopted in 2006 and 2005 for the actuarial calculation are summarized
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
Pension benefits |
|
Health care benefits |
|
Pension benefits |
|
Health care benefits |
Discount rates |
|
Inflation: 4.5% + 6% |
|
Inflation: 4.5% + 6% |
|
Inflation: 5% + 6% |
|
Inflation: 5% + 6% |
Rates of increase in
compensation levels |
|
Inflation: 4.5% + 2.02% |
|
Inflation: 4.5% + 2.02% |
|
Inflation: 5% + 2.08% |
|
Inflation: 5% + 2.08% |
Expected long-term rate of
return on assets |
|
Inflation: 4.5% + 6.19% |
|
Not applicable |
|
Inflation: 5% + 6.19% |
|
Not applicable |
Mortality table |
|
AT 2000* |
|
AT 2000* |
|
AT 2000 |
|
AT 2000 |
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Segregated by sex (male and female). |
Petrobras has aggregated information for all defined benefit pension plans. The domestic
benefit plans of Petrobras, BR Distribuidora, PETROQUISA, and REFAP contain similar assumptions
and the benefit obligation related to PEPSA, the international plan, is not significant to the
total obligation and thus has also been aggregated. All Petrobras group pension plans have
accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets.
F-73
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
16. |
|
Employees Post-retirement Benefits and Other Benefits (Continued) |
|
(f) |
|
Funded status of the plans (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The determination of the expense and liability relating to the Companys pension plan involves
the use of judgment in the determination of actuarial assumptions. These include estimates of
future mortality, withdrawal, changes in compensation and discount rate to reflect the time
value of money as well as the rate of return on plan assets. These assumptions are reviewed at
least annually and may differ materially from actual results due to changing market and
economic conditions, regulatory events, judicial rulings, higher or lower withdrawal rates or
longer or shorter life spans of participants. |
|
|
|
|
According to the requirements of SFAS 87, and subsequent interpretations, the discount rate
should be based on current prices for settling the pension obligation. Applying the precepts of
SFAS 87 in historically inflationary environments such as Brazil creates certain issues as the
ability for a company to settle a pension obligation at a future point in time may not exist as
long-term financial instruments of suitable grade may not exist locally as they do in the
United States. |
|
|
|
|
Although the Brazilian market has been demonstrating signs of stabilization under the present
economic model, as reflected in market interest rates, it is not yet prudent to conclude that
market interest rates will be stable. |
|
|
|
|
In 2004, Petrobras approved a change to a new mortality table of the actuarial assumptions of
the pension and healthcare plans in Brazil; this new mortality table reflects updated
assumptions and changes relative to the profile of employees, retirees and pensioners, based on
longevity, age of invalidity and invalid mortality tables. |
|
|
(g) |
|
Cash contributions and benefit payments |
|
|
|
|
In 2006, the Company contributed US$187 to its pension plans. In 2007, the Company expects
contributions to be approximately US$194. Actual contribution amounts are dependent upon
investment returns, changes in pension obligations and other economic factors. Additional
funding may ultimately be required if investment returns are insufficient to offset increases
in plan obligations. |
F-74
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
16. |
|
Employees Post-retirement Benefits and Other Benefits (Continued) |
|
(g) |
|
Cash contributions and benefit payments (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The following benefit payments, which include estimated future service, are expected to be paid
by the pension fund in the next 10 years: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension benefits |
|
Health care benefits |
2007 |
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
2008 |
|
|
902 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
2009 |
|
|
985 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
2010 |
|
|
1,082 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
2011 |
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
Subsequent five years |
|
|
7,949 |
|
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
(a) |
|
Capital |
|
|
|
|
The Companys subscribed and fully paid-in capital at December 31, 2006 consisted of
2,536,673,672 common shares and 1,850,364,698 preferred shares, and at December 31, 2005
consisted of 2,536,673,672 common shares and 1,849,478,028 preferred shares, as retroactively
restated for stock split, mentioned below. The preferred shares do not have any voting rights
and are not convertible into common shares and vice-versa. Preferred shares have priority in
the receipt of dividends and return of capital. |
|
|
|
|
On May 13, 2005, Petrobras management approved the proposed share split and the related
amendment to article 4 of the Companys by-laws. These issues were discussed by the
shareholders at the Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM) held on June 15, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
The Extraordinary General Meeting held on July 22, 2005 decided to effect a split of each
Companys share into four, resulting in a free distribution of 3 (three) new shares of the same
type for each original share, based on the shareholding structure at August 31, 2005. At the
same date, an amendment to article 4 of the Companys by-laws to cause capital be divided into
4,386,151,700 shares, of which 2,536,673,672 are common shares and
1,849,478,028 are preferred shares, with no nominal value, was approved. This amendment to the Companys bylaws is
effective from September 1, 2005. |
F-75
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
17. |
|
Shareholders Equity (Continued) |
|
(a) |
|
Capital (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The relation between the American Depository Receipt (ADS) and shares of each class was changed
from one to four shares for one ADS. All share and per share information in the accompanying
financial statements and notes has been adjusted to reflect the result of the share split. |
|
|
|
|
Current Brazilian law requires that the Federal Government retain ownership of 50% plus one
share of the Companys voting shares. |
|
|
|
|
Shareholders at the Extraordinary General Meeting held June 01, 2006 approved the incorporation
of shares in PETROQUISA by Petrobras, pursuant to the re-ratification of the Protocol of Merger
and Incorporation on the share incorporation transaction executed by the two companies. The
Board of Directors of the Company approved the issue of 886,670 preferred shares of the Company
in connection with the incorporation of shares in PETROQUISA by Petrobras. |
|
|
|
|
To implement the transaction, the exchange ratio for the shares to be used was based on the net
equity value of both companies at the base date of December 31,
2005, when 4.496 preferred shares issued by Petrobras were attributed to each batch of 1,000 common or preferred shares
issued by PETROQUISA. |
|
|
|
|
No Petrobras shareholders had stated their intention to exercise the right withdraw by the
legal deadline of July 07, 2006. Five PETROQUISAs shareholders with a total interest of
1,015,910 shares exercised the right to withdraw by the established deadline (by July 05, 2006)
and were reimbursed at the rate of R$153.47 (US$71) per batch of 1,000 shares, using funds
provided by PETROQUISA, on July 10, 2006. Petrobras then acquired the shares for the same
price, thereby transferring ownership. |
F-76
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
17. |
|
Shareholders Equity (Continued) |
|
(a) |
|
Capital (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
On December 15, 2006, pursuant to article 29, section II of the Company By-laws, the Board of
Directors authorized the buyback of part of the preferred shares in circulation for future
cancellation, using funds from the profit reserves subject to the following terms: |
|
|
|
Objective: reduce the excess of cash and enhance the capital structure, helping to reduce the cost of Petrobras capital. |
|
|
|
|
Amount: up to 91,500,000 preferred shares, corresponding to 4.9% of the total of this class of share in circulation, which is 1,850,364,700 shares. |
|
|
|
|
Price: the acquisition will occur on the Stock Exchange, at market values on the acquisition dates throughout the buyback term. |
|
|
|
|
Term: up to 365 (three hundred and sixty-five) days as from December 15, 2006. |
In line with its share buyback policy, the Board of Directors concluded the current cash
situation enables this project to be implemented without compromising the dividend payment and
the investment program, while maintaining the operating and financial targets established in
the Strategic Plan.
At an Extraordinary General Meeting held together with the General Ordinary Meeting, on April
2, 2007, the shareholders of Petrobras approved an increase in the Companys capital to
US$24,623 (R$52,644) through the capitalization of revenue reserves accrued during previous
financial years, in the amount of US$1,577 (R$3,372), and of statutory reserve, in the amount
of US$471 (R$1,008), and without the issuance of new shares, in accordance with article 169,
paragraph 1, Law No. 6.404/76. This capitalization aimed to bring the Companys capital in line
with the investments of an oil company given intensive use of capital and extended operating
cycles.
F-77
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
17. |
|
Shareholders Equity (Continued) |
|
(a) |
|
Capital (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
At an Extraordinary General Meeting held together with the General Ordinary Meeting, on April
3, 2006, the shareholders of the Company approved an increase in the Companys capital to
US$22,397 (R$48,248) through the capitalization of retained earnings accrued during previous
financial years, in the amount of US$6,969 (R$15,012), and without the issuance of new shares,
in accordance with article 169, paragraph 1, Law no. 6,404/76. This capitalization aimed to
bring the Companys capital in line with the investments of an oil company given intensive use
of capital and extended operating cycles. |
|
|
|
|
The General Extraordinary Meeting, held together with the General Ordinary meeting on March 29,
2004, increased the Companys capital to US$11,701, through the capitalization of revenue
reserves accrued during previous financial years, in the amount of US$4,439, and without the
issuance of new shares, in accordance with article 169, paragraph 1, Law No. 6,404/76. This
capitalization was made in order to bring the Companys capital in line with the investment
requirements of an oil company given intensive use of capital and extended operating cycles. |
|
|
|
|
The Extraordinary General Meeting held on March 29, 2004 also approved an increase in the
Companys authorized capital (paragraph 1, article 4, of the Companys by-laws) from R$30.000
million to R$60.000 million, through the issuance of up to 200,000,000 (two hundred million)
preferred shares for payment in cash, assets and credit capitalization. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Dividends and interest on shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
In accordance with the Companys by-laws, holders of preferred and common shares are entitled
to a minimum dividend of 25% of annual net income as adjusted under Brazilian Corporate Law. In
addition, the preferred shareholders have priority in the receipt of an annual dividend of at
least 3% of the book value of the shares or 5% of the paid-in capital in respect of the
preferred shares as stated in the statutory accounting records. As of January 1, 1996 amounts
attributed to shareholders as interest (see below) can be deducted from the minimum dividend
computation. Dividends are paid in Brazilian reais. The Company paid US$760 in dividends during
the year ended December 31, 2006 (2005 US$275 2004 US$366). No withholding tax is payable
on distributions of dividends made since January 1, 1996. |
F-78
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
17. |
|
Shareholders Equity (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Dividends and interest on shareholders equity (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Brazilian corporations are permitted to attribute interest on shareholders equity, which may
either be paid in cash or be used to increase capital stock. The calculation is based on
shareholders equity amounts as stated in the statutory accounting records and the interest
rate applied may not exceed the Taxa de Juros de Longo Prazo (long-term interest rate or the
TJLP) as determined by the Brazilian Central Bank. Such interest may not exceed the greatest
of 50% of net income or 50% of retained earnings plus revenue reserves. Interest on
shareholders equity, is subject to withholding tax at the rate of 15%, except for untaxed or
exempt shareholders, as established by Law No. 9,249/95. The Company paid US$2,453 in interest
on shareholders equity during the year ended December 31, 2006 (2005 US$1,835 2004 -
US$1,443). |
|
|
|
|
The dividends related to the fiscal year ended December 31,2006 approved at the Ordinary
General Meeting held on April 2, 2007, in the amount of US$3,693, corresponding to US$0.84 per
common and preferred share and US$3.36 per ADS conforms to the by-laws in regard to guaranteed
rights of preferred shares (article 5), and distributes dividends calculated on the adjusted
net income to common and preferred shareholders. This dividend includes interest on capital
approved by the Board of Directors on October 20, 2006, in the amount of US$2,052, which was
made available to shareholders on January 4, 2007, based on the shareholding position of
October 31, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
The second portion of interest on capital, approved by the Board of Directors on December 15,
2006, was made available to shareholders on March 30, 2007, based on the shareholding position
of December 28, 2006, amounting to US$923. The final portion of dividends in the amount of
US$718, approved by the Board of Directors on February 12, 2007, which will be made available
based on the shareholding position of April 2, 2007, when occured the Ordinary General Meeting
which resolved the matter. |
|
|
|
|
Interest on capital amounts are subject to withholding tax at the rate of 15%, except for
untaxed or exempt shareholders, as established by Law No. 9,249/95. The dividends and the final
portion of the interest on shareholders equity will be paid until June 1, 2007 as established
by the General Shareholders Meeting. These amounts will be monetarily restated from December
31, 2006 to the initial date of payment, according to the variation in the SELIC rate. |
F-79
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
17. |
|
Shareholders Equity (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Dividends and interest on shareholders equity (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Interest on shareholders equity was included with the proposed dividend for the year, as
established in the Companys by-laws, generated an income tax and social contribution credits
of US$1,012 (US$791 in 2005, and US$650 in 2004). |
|
|
|
|
The dividends related to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005, approved at the General
Shareholders Meeting held April 3, 2006, in the amount of US$2,998, (including the portions of
interest on shareholders equity, in the amount of US$933, paid to the shareholders on January
5, 2006, and in the amount of US$939, paid to the shareholders on March 22, 2006) were made
available to shareholders on May 23, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
The dividends related to the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004, approved at the General
Shareholders Meeting held March 31, 2005, in the amount of US$1,900, (including the portion of
interest on shareholders equity, in the amount of US$1,239, paid to the shareholders on
February 15, 2005) were made available to shareholders on May 17, 2005. |
|
|
|
|
Brazilian law permits the payment of dividends only from retained earnings as stated in the
statutory accounting records. At December 31, 2006, the Company had appropriated all such
retained earnings. |
|
|
|
|
In addition, at December 31, 2006, the undistributed reserve in appropriated retained earnings,
amounting to US$20,074, may be used for dividend distribution purposes, if so approved by the
shareholders, however, the Companys stated intent is to use such reserve to fund working
capital and capital expenditures. |
F-80
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
17. |
|
Shareholders Equity (Continued) |
|
(c) |
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share amounts have been calculated as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Income before extraordinary item |
|
|
12,826 |
|
|
|
10,186 |
|
|
|
6,190 |
|
Extraordinary gain, net of taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the period |
|
|
12,826 |
|
|
|
10,344 |
|
|
|
6,190 |
|
Less priority preferred share dividends |
|
|
(577 |
) |
|
|
(426 |
) |
|
|
(297 |
) |
Less common shares dividends, up to the
priority preferred
Shares dividends on a per-share basis |
|
|
(791 |
) |
|
|
(584 |
) |
|
|
(407 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining net income to be equally allocated to
common and preferred shares |
|
|
11,458 |
|
|
|
9,334 |
|
|
|
5,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common/ADS |
|
|
2,536,673,672 |
|
|
|
2,536,673,672 |
|
|
|
2,536,673,672 |
|
Preferred/ADS |
|
|
1,849,903,144 |
|
|
|
1,849,478,028 |
|
|
|
1,849,478,028 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per share
Common and preferred (*) (**) |
|
|
2.92 |
|
|
|
2.32 |
|
|
|
1.41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per ADS (*) (**) |
|
|
11.68 |
|
|
|
9.28 |
|
|
|
5.64 |
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Per share data is presented after extraordinary item . |
|
(**) |
|
Considers effect of 4 for 1 stock split that occurred on September 1, 2005. |
|
|
|
AFRMM |
|
|
|
|
Relates to the Merchant Marine (AFRMM) freight surcharges levied in accordance with relevant
legislation. These funds are used to purchase, enlarge or repair vessels of the Companys
transport fleet. |
|
|
|
|
Fiscal incentive reserve |
|
|
|
|
This reserve consists of investments in tax incentives in the Northeast Investment Fund
(FINOR), arising from allocations of part of the Companys income tax. |
F-81
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
17. |
|
Shareholders Equity (Continued) |
|
(e) |
|
Appropriated retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
Brazilian Law and the Companys by-laws require that certain appropriations be made from
retained earnings to reserve accounts annually. The purpose and basis of appropriation to such
reserves are as follows: |
|
|
|
Legal reserve |
|
|
|
|
This reserve is a requirement for all Brazilian corporations and represents the annual
appropriation of 5% of net income as stated in the statutory accounting records up to a limit
of 20% of capital stock. The reserve may be used to increase capital or to compensate for
losses, but may not be distributed as cash dividends. |
|
|
|
|
Undistributed earnings reserve |
|
|
|
|
This reserve is established in accordance with Article 196 of Law No. 6,404/76 to fund the
Companys annual investment program. The appropriation of income for the year ended December
31, 2004 included a retention of earnings in the amount of US$4,396, of which US$4,392 related
to net income for the year and US$4 to the remaining balance of retained earnings, approved by
the General Shareholders Meeting held on March 31, 2005. This proposal was intended to cover
partially the annual investment program established in the capital budget for 2005. |
|
|
|
|
The destination of net income for the year ended December 31, 2005 included retention of
profits of US$6,453, with a US$6,449 amount, arising from net income for the year, and the
US$4 retaining earnings remaining balance. This retention was intended to cover partially the
annual investment program established in the 2006 capital budget, ad referendum of the General
Shareholders Meeting of April 3, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
The destination of net income for the year ended December 31, 2006 includes retention of
profits of US$8,004 with a US$7,775 amount, arising from net income for the year, and the
US$229 retaining earnings remaining balance. This proposal is intended cover to partially meet
the annual investment program established in the 2007 capital budget, ad referendum of the
General Shareholders Meeting of April 2, 2007. |
F-82
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
17. |
|
Shareholders Equity (Continued) |
|
(e) |
|
Appropriated retained earnings (Continued) |
|
|
|
Statutory reserve |
|
|
|
|
This reserve is provided through an amount equivalent to a minimum of 0.5% of subscribed and
fully paid in capital at year-end. The reserve is used to fund the costs incurred with
research and technological development programs. The accumulated balance of this reserve
cannot exceed 5% of the capital stock, according to Article 55 of the Companys by-laws. |
18. |
|
Domestic and International Acquisitions |
|
(a) |
|
Acquisition of Pasadena Refinery |
|
|
|
|
On September 1, 2006, the Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary Petrobras America Inc.,
concluded the acquisition of 50% of the shares of Pasadena Refinery System, Inc., a US based
refining and trading company owned by the Belgian group Compagnie Nationale a Portefeuille SA -
CNP. The purchase price was of approximately US$416 and was based on economic valuation model
of expected future earnings of the refinery. Due to immateriality, proforma information has
not been presented. |
|
|
|
|
The acquisition was consumated principally to expand Petrobras international activities
according to the Strategic Plan. |
|
|
|
|
The current capacity of the Pasadena Refinery is of about 100,000 bpd. The Company and the
other partner are already conducting studies to expand its capacity and install units that will
enable it to process heavy oils, including Petrobras Marlim production, and deliver high
quality products. |
|
|
|
|
With Petrobras entering as a partner in the enterprise, the refinery will be modified in order
to process approximately additional 70,000 bbl/day of heavy oil and other batches, including
production in the Marlim field. The refinerys operational modernization process should be
completed in four years and all of the by-products to be produced will comply with the highest
standards of quality adopted in the United States. |
F-83
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
18. |
|
Domestic and International Acquisitions (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Acquisition of Liquigás Distribuidora S.A. |
|
|
|
|
On August 9, 2004, the Companys subsidiary, Petrobras Distribuidora S.A. BR, acquired from
ENI B.V. 100% of the capital of its Brazilian subsidiary Liquigás Distribuidora S.A. (former
Sophia do Brasil S.A. and Agip do Brasil S.A.), assuming its control from that date. |
|
|
|
|
The purchase price paid for Liquigás Distribuidora S.A. was based on an economic valuation
model of expected future earnings of Liquigás Distribuidora S.A., which considered relevant
factors, including the potential effects of the economic situation of Brazil. The acquisition
of Liquigás Distribuidora S.A. totaled US$511. The Company paid US$225 in cash, and settled a
debt of US$225 that the former Agip do Brasil had with ENI BV. An additional amount of US$61
related to subsequent purchase price adjustments was paid on December 10, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
The acquisition of Liquigás Distribuidora S.A. was recorded using the purchase method of
accounting and the financial statements of Liquigás Distribuidora S.A. were included in the
consolidated Petrobras financial statements, beginning in August of 2004. The purchase price
allocation was based on the fair market value. |
|
|
|
|
Liquigás Distribuidora S.A. is a liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), fuel and lubricant distributor,
and has 21.5% share in the LPG market in Brazil, 3.8% of total fuel distribution domestic
market with a network of more than 1,500 service stations and 3% share in the Brazilian
lubricant distribution market. |
|
|
|
|
The acquisition of Liquigás Distribuidora S.A. contributes toward achieving the objectives
established in Petrobras Strategic Planning for its subsidiary BR of expanding its share in
the LPG distribution segment, and also of consolidating its penetration in the automotive fuel
distribution market in certain regions of the country. |
F-84
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
18. |
|
Domestic and International Acquisitions (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Acquisition of Liquigás Distribuidora S.A. (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The following unaudited pro forma summary financial information presents the consolidated
results of operations as if the acquisition of Liquigás Distribuidora S.A. had occurred at the
beginning of the years presented. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro-forma |
|
|
As reported |
|
(unaudited) |
Net operating revenues |
|
|
38,428 |
|
|
|
39,529 |
|
Cost of Sales |
|
|
(21,279 |
) |
|
|
(22,222 |
) |
Net income for the period |
|
|
6,190 |
|
|
|
6,182 |
|
Basic and diluted earnings per common and
preferred share (*) |
|
|
1.41 |
|
|
|
1.41 |
|
Basic and diluted earnings per ADS (*) |
|
|
5.64 |
|
|
|
5.64 |
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Considers effect of 4 for 1 stock split that occurred on September 1, 2005. |
|
(c) |
|
Acquisition of Triunfos shares by PETROQUISA |
|
|
|
|
The Companys subsidiary, Petrobras Química S.A. PETROQUISA decided to exercise its
preemptive right in the acquisition of shares held by PRIMERA Indústria e Comércio Ltda. in the
capital of Petroquímica Triunfo S.A. (Triunfo) in response to the put option. |
|
|
|
|
After exercise of its preemptive right on May 14, 2004, PETROQUISA, which had previously held
45.22% of voting capital and 59.92% of capital stock of Petroquímica Triunfo increased its
interest to 70.45% of voting capital and 85.04% of its capital stock. The results of Triunfo
have been included to the Petrobras Consolidated Financial Statements since May of 2004. Due to
immateriality, the Company has not prepared pro forma information respective to this business
combination. |
|
|
|
|
The acquisition was consummated principally to expand Petrobras petrochemical activities
according to the Strategic Plan approved in May 14, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
The Company paid US$32 (R$101 million) in cash and this purchase price was based on an economic
valuation model of expected future earnings of Petroquímica Triunfo S.A. |
|
|
|
|
Petroquímica Triunfo S.A. produces low-density polyethylene and has an installed capacity of
160,000 tons per year. Triunfos activities are exclusively in Brazil. |
F-85
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
18. |
|
Domestic and International Acquisitions (Continued) |
|
(d) |
|
Acquisition of FAFEN Energia S.A. |
|
|
|
|
On December 27, 2004, Petrobras approved the acquisition of the remaining 80% interest in the
FAFEN Energia S.A. thermoelectric power plant, thus bringing its ownership interest to 100%.
Petrobras will pay EDP Brasil S.A. US$36 for the acquisition, payable as follows: 50% 30 days
after the closing of the operation, 25% one year thereafter and the remaining 25% two years
thereafter. This thermoelectric power plant has an installed capacity of 133 MW for electricity
generation and 42 ton/hour for steam generation and is located in the State of Bahia. |
|
|
|
|
The acquisition of FAFEN was recorded using the purchase method of accounting and the assets
and liabilities were included in the consolidated Petrobras financial statements as of December
31, 2004. Results of operations were included in the consolidated Petrobras financial
statements beginning on January 2005. |
|
|
|
|
The purchase price for FAFEN was allocated based on the fair market value of the assets
acquired and the liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date as determined by independent
appraisers. Due to immateriality, the Company has not prepared pro-forma information respective
to this business combination. |
|
|
(e) |
|
Acquisition of Baixada Santista Energia Ltda. BSE |
|
|
|
|
On March 9, 2005, Petrobras approved the conditions agreed with Marubeni Corporation, for the
purchase of quotas held by Marubeni Corporation in Baixada Santista Energia Ltda. BSE, a
special purpose company incorporated within the UTE Cubatão Project. This operation involves
approximately US$90, and project resumption will meet the present requirements for the energy
and steam power generation system renewal for the Cubatão Refinery (RPBC). Upon conclusion,
this plant will have an installed capacity of 200 MW for electricity generation and 400
ton/hours for steam generation. |
|
|
|
|
The Thermoelectric Plant of Cubatão is expected to start operating in October 2007 and will
supply 47 MW and 415 t/h of steam to Refinaria Presidente Bernardes in Cubatão (RPBC),
belonging to Petrobras. Electricity surplus will be made available to the market. Due to
immateriality, the Company has not prepared pro forma information respective to this business
combination. |
F-86
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
18. |
|
Domestic and International Acquisitions (Continued) |
|
(f) |
|
Acquisition of new businesses in Colombia, Paraguay and Uruguay |
|
|
|
|
In December 2005, Petrobras signed three Share Purchase Agreements for the acquisition of fuel
businesses (retail and trade markets) in Colombia and of total operations conducted by Shell in
Paraguay and Uruguay. |
|
|
|
|
In March 2006, Petrobras, through its controlled company Petrobras International Braspetro
B.V., acquired the business of commercialization and distribution of Shell in Paraguay, related
to fuel operations (retail and commercial market), including gas stations with convenience
stores in all Paraguayan territory; LPG commercialization assets; installations for
commercialization of aviation products for the airports in Asunción and Cidade Del Este. |
|
|
|
|
On April 28, 2006 Petrobras concluded the purchase of the assets of Shell in Colombia, relating
to the fuel distribution and commercialization. The acquisition comprises 39 service stations
and convenience shops in Bogotá and surrounding areas, storage base and lubricant mixing plant
in Puente Aranda, and one terminal in Santa Marta. |
|
|
|
|
In June 2006, Petrobras acquired, via its subsidiary Petrobras International Braspetro B.V. -
PIB BV, Shells assets in Uruguay relating to the distribution and sale of fuel throughout
Uruguay. |
|
|
|
|
The Company paid US$116 for these acquisitions that are part of a package involving the assets
of Shell in Colombia, in Paraguay and in Uruguay. |
|
|
|
|
Due to immateriality, the Company has not prepared pro-forma information respective to this
business combination. |
|
|
(g) |
|
Acquisition of a 49% interest in TERMOBAHIA |
|
|
|
|
The Special Purpose Company (SPC) BLADE Securities Ltd (BLADE), was created by the Deutsche
Bank (DB), in order to support Petrobras in its transactions related to the acquisition of a
49% interest held by ABB-EV in TERMOBAHIA power plant. (See note 14). |
F-87
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
18. |
|
Domestic and International Acquisitions (Continued) |
|
(g) |
|
Acquisition of a 49% interest in TERMOBAHIA (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
On December 28, 2005, Petrobras exercised its preemptive right and concluded the acquisition
of a 49% interest held by ABB-EV in TERMOBAHIA, comprising shares and amounts receivable in
the total amount of US$45, under a financial structuring agreed upon with the IDB. |
|
|
|
|
This financial structuring involves two simultaneous operations: the acquisition of ABB-EVs
rights and the sale of such rights to a private institution until a strategic partner is
introduced by Petrobras within a maximum period of one year. The Companys previous investment
on TERMOBAHIA was being accounted for in accordance to FIN 46 ( R ) |
|
|
|
|
On August 10, 2006, Petrobras concluded the acquisition of the equity interest and the credits
relating to the Subordinated Loan of EIC Electricity S.A. in TERMOBAHIA for the amount of
US$2, raising its interest to 31%. |
|
|
|
|
At the conclusion of this operation, the equity interests in TERMOBAHIAs were held as
follows: Petrobras 31%, PETROS 20% and BLADE 49%. |
|
|
|
|
Due to the immateriality, proforma information has not been presented (see Note 14 discussion
regarding Blade). |
|
|
(h) |
|
Agreement for sale and association with Teikoku Oil Co. Ltd. in operations in Ecuador |
|
|
|
|
On January 11, 2007 the Ministry of Energy and Mines of Ecuador approved the agreement between
Petrobras Energia S.A. PESA and Teikoku for sale of 40% of the rights and obligations in
the participation contracts in Blocks 18 and 31 in Ecuador. The Company does not expect to
have a material impact on its Financial Statements as a result of this agreement. |
F-88
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
18. |
|
Domestic and International Acquisitions (Continued) |
|
(i) |
|
Eletrobolt |
|
|
|
|
On August 13, 2004, the Board of Directors of Petrobras approved the financial conditions for
the acquisition of 100% interest of Eletrobolt Thermoelectric plant from Sociedade Fluminense
de Energia, with a share purchase price of US$65. The Companys previous variable interest in
Eletrobolt was being accounted for in accordance with FIN 46(R) and the 2004 share acquisition
was accounted for as a business combination but had no material impact on Petrobras
consolidated accounting records. Due to immateriality, proforma information has not been
presented. |
|
|
(j) |
|
Termorio |
|
|
|
|
In February, 2005, in order to facilitate the financial restructuring process of Termorio,
Petrobras acquired the remaining 50% interest of Termorio ´s voting capital from NRG for US$83
bringing its ownership to 100% of total and voting capital. The Companys previous variable
interest in Termorio was being accounted for in accordance with FIN 46(R) and the 2005 share
acquisition was accounted for as a business combination but had no material impact on
Petrobras consolidated accounting records. Due to immateriality, proforma information has not
been presented. |
|
|
(k) |
|
Termoceará |
|
|
|
|
On June 24, 2005, Petrobras acquired Termoceará Ltda., a plant with net generation capacity of
220 MW/h. The acquisition price was equal to US$137, of which US$81 related to the purchase of
tangible assets of the thermoelectric plant and US$56 was designated to settle payables to the
lenders of the project (BNDES and Eximbank). The excess of amounts paid over fair value of
assets acquired is attributable to intangible assets and goodwill. |
|
|
|
|
The Companys previous variable interest in Termoceará was being accounted for in accordance
with FIN 46(R) and the 2005 share acquisition was accounted for as a business combination but
had no material impact on Petrobras consolidated accounting records. Due to immateriality,
proforma information has not been presented. |
F-89
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
18. |
|
Domestic and International Acquisitions (Continued) |
|
(l) |
|
TermoMacaé Ltda. and TermoMacaé Comercializadora de Energia Ltda. (former Macaé
Merchant) |
|
|
|
|
In February 2005, the arbitration proceedings began related to the dispute between Petrobras
and El Paso arising from the economic and financial imbalance deemed to exist relative to the
construction and operation of the Macaé Merchant Thermoelectric Plant. Petrobras claims such
contract to be invalid and require re-negotiation as a result of changed economics. Related to
the disputes, Petrobras made a court ordered bank deposit related to unpaid contingency the
amounts, while awaiting final decision of the Arbitration proceedings. |
|
|
|
|
In March 2006 Petrobras and El Paso agreed to settle certain disputes involving the Macaé
Merchant Consortium. Under this settlement, the capital participation contract was terminated
and El Paso finalized the sale of the plant to Petrobras, which in April 2006 paid US$357 to
acquire the companies TermoMacaé Ltda (f.k.a. El Paso Rio Claro Ltda.) and TermoMacaé
Comercializadora de Energia Ltda. (f.k.a. El Paso Rio Grande Ltda.), terminating the Macaé
Merchant Consortium Contract and thereby settling the controversies. |
|
|
|
|
Under the acquisition process, El Paso gave guarantees to Petrobras relating to certain
liabilities, limited to US$120, including approximately US$78, referring to a federal tax
assessment, which El Paso believes it has excellent chances of successfully contesting, and for
which it has presented its defense to the Brazilian tax authorities. In respect of the
acquisition of the assets, any successes involving given tax benefits, tax receivables and
potential recoveries on financial revenues shall be prorated between Petrobras and El Paso as
mutually agreed. |
|
|
|
|
On July 05, 2006 Petrobras was reimbursed for the amounts deposited by virtue of the preliminary
decision pronounced by the Arbitral Tribunal, to the amount of US$259, including financial
yields, given the dismissal of the Arbitration Proceeding. |
|
|
|
|
The Companys previous variable interest in TermoMacaé was being accounted for in accordance
with FIN 46(R) and the 2006 share acquisition was accounted for as a business combination but
had no material impact on Petrobras consolidated accounting records. Due to immateriality,
proforma information has not been presented. |
F-90
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
18. |
|
Domestic and International Acquisitions (Continued) |
|
(m) |
|
Acquisition of shares in Gaseba Uruguai S.A. |
|
|
|
|
In November 2005, the Board of Directors of Petrobras approved the acquisition of 51% of the
capital of Gaseba Uruguay Grupo Gaz de France S.A. (Gaseba), a natural gas distribution
concession company in Montevideo, Uruguay from GDF International. |
|
|
|
|
In June 2006, Petrobras acquired 66% of the shares in Gaseba. The share acquisition took place
over two stages: 51% of the shares held by Grupo Gaz de France were acquired on June 2, 2006
and 15% of the shares held by Acodike Supergas S.A. were acquired on June 29, 2006. The
acquisition price was equal to US$14 and due to immateriality, proforma information has not
been presented. |
19. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
|
|
Petrobras is subject to a number of commitments and contingencies arising in the normal course of
its business. Additionally, the operations and earnings of the Company have been, and may be in
the future, affected from time to time in varying degrees by political developments and laws and
regulations, such as the Federal Governments continuing role as the controlling shareholder of
the Company, the status of the Brazilian economy, forced divestiture of assets, tax increases and
retroactive tax claims, and environmental regulations. The likelihood of such occurrences and
their overall effect upon the Company are not predictable. |
|
|
|
The Company currently has several contracts to purchase crude oil, diesel fuel and other oil
products, which require the Company to purchase a minimum of approximately 129,925 barrels per
day at respective current market prices. |
|
|
|
Petrobras provided guarantees to the ANP for the minimum exploration program defined in the
concession contracts for exploration areas, totaling US$2,425 (US$2,244 in 2005). Out of this
total, US$1,137(US$1,875 in 2005) represents a pledge on the oil to be extracted from previously
identified fields already in production, for areas in which the Company had already made
commercial discoveries or investments. For areas whose concessions were obtained by bidding from
the ANP, Petrobras has given bank guarantees totaling US$372 through December 31, 2006 (US$369 in
2005). |
F-91
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
19. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Continued) |
|
|
|
In 1993, the Company signed a long-term contract to buy gas (The Gas Supply Agreement or GSA)
with Yacimientos Petrolíferos Fiscales Bolivianos, the Bolivian state oil company for the
purchase of natural gas. Under this contract, with maturity in 2019, the Company is required to
purchase 80% of the natural gas transported through the Bolivia/Brazil natural gas pipeline over
a 20 year term at contract prices ranging from US$1.07 per MMBTU to US$1.17 MMBTU, based upon
throughput. The pipeline achieved an average throughput of 24.4 million cubic meters per day
during 2006. |
|
|
|
The Company has exclusive supply contracts with certain service stations. These contracts are
typically for seven years and require the Company to sell product at market prices. |
|
(a) |
|
Litigation |
|
|
|
|
The Company is a defendant in numerous legal actions involving civil, tax, labor, corporate and
environment issues arising in the normal course of its business. Based on the advice of its
internal legal counsel and managements best judgment, the Company has recorded accruals in
amounts sufficient to provide for losses that are considered probable and reasonably estimable.
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the respective amounts accrued by type of claims are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Labor claims |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Tax claims |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
Civil claims |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
Commercials claims and other contingencies |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contingencies for joint liability |
|
|
|
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
310 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current contingencies |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term contingencies |
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-92
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
19. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Continued) |
|
(a) |
|
Litigation (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005, in accordance with Brazilian law, the Company had paid US$816
and US$775, respectively, into federal depositories to provide collateral for these and other
claims until they are settled. These amounts are reflected in the balance sheet as restricted
deposits for legal proceedings and guarantees. |
|
|
|
|
The Company is a party to several contracts related to the acquisition and upgrade of
production Platform P-36, which was lost in its entirety in 2001. Pursuant to those contracts,
the Company had an obligation to pay the insurance proceeds to a Security Agent for
distribution according to specified clauses established in the contracts. The Company contends
that it is entitled to the insurance proceeds under the contractual arrangements, and other
parties contend that they are also entitled to such proceeds. The issue is subject to
international proceedings in a British court. Pending determination of the issue by the
international court, the Company committed to deposit cash collateral in the amount of US$175,
in order to facilitate the issuance of a guarantee by a Security Agent, for the payment of
creditors. At December 31, 2006, this amount was included in the balance sheet as restricted
deposits for legal proceedings and guarantees. |
|
|
|
|
Plaintiff: Kallium Mineração S.A. |
|
|
|
|
On May 28, 1981, Kallium Mineração S.A. brought an action against Petromisa, a former
subsidiary of Petrobras, in the Federal Court of the State of Rio de Janeiro alleging damages
of approximately US$450 relating to the rescission of a contract to develop a potassium salt
mine. On August 10,1999, a decision was handed down that considered most of the plaintiffs
petitions to be without grounds (losses, damages and loss of profit), requiring only the
Company to reimburse all expenses incurred as a result of the prospecting research carried
out, in accordance with amounts to be calculated in the final award. No award for loss of
profit was established in the decision. In September of 1999 both parties filed appeals with
the appeals court in the state of Rio de Janeiro. Granted by the lower court, both parties
filed appeals, which were rejected. Petrobras is awaiting judgment of the Extraordinary Appeal
filed before the STF and the special appeal on December 18, 2003. A special appeal brought by
Kallium is also pending judgment. Based on the opinion of its legal advisers, management does
not expect an unfavorable outcome in this case and considers the risk of loss with respect to
this lawsuit to be possible. |
F-93
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
19. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Continued) |
|
(a) |
|
Litigation (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Plaintiff: PORTO SEGURO IMÓVEIS LTDA. |
|
|
|
|
On November 23, 1992, PORTO SEGURO IMÓVEIS LTDA., a minority shareholder of PETROQUISA, filed a
suit against Petrobras in the State Court of Rio de Janeiro related to alleged losses resulting
from the sale of a minority holding by PETROQUISA in various petrochemical companies included
in the National Privatization Program introduced by Law No. 8,031/90. |
|
|
|
|
In this suit, the plaintiff claims that Petrobras, as the majority shareholder in PETROQUISA,
should be obliged to reinstate the loss caused to the net worth of PETROQUISA, as a result of
the acts that approved the minimum sale price of its holding in the capital of privatized
companies. A decision was handed down on January 14, 1997 that considered Petrobras liable with
respect to PETROQUISA for losses and damages in an amount equivalent to US$3,406. |
|
|
|
|
In addition to this amount, Petrobras was required to pay the plaintiff 5% of the value of the
compensation as a premium (see art. 246, paragraph 2 of Law No. 6,404/76), in addition to
attorneys fees of approximately 20% of the same amount. However, since the award would be
payable to PETROQUISA and Petrobras holds 99.0% of its capital, the effective disbursement if
the ruling is not reversed will be restricted to 25% of the total award. Petrobras filed an
appeal with the State Court of Rio de Janeiro, and received a favorable decision from the Third
Civil Court on February 11, 2003, which, by a majority vote, accepted Petrobras appeal to
reverse the judgment and ruled the plaintiffs case to be without grounds, the revising judges
decision that held the case to be partially with grounds to reduce the amount of compensation
to US$1,538 being overruled. Against this decision, Porto Seguro filed another appeal (motion
to reverse or annul) with the State Court of Rio de Janeiro, and the Fourth Civil Court handed
down a unanimous decision on March 30, 2004 requiring Petrobras to indemnify PETROQUISA and
Porto Seguro the amounts of US$2,359 and US$590 respectively (the latter representing 5% in
premium and 20% in attorneys fees). Due to this result, Petrobras lodged appeal with high and
supreme courts, which was dismissed. In view of this decision, interlocutory appeal was filed
with High Court STJ and Supreme Court STF, which was converted into Special Appeal by STJ. |
F-94
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
19. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Continued) |
|
(a) |
|
Litigation (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Plaintiff: PORTO SEGURO IMÓVEIS LTDA. (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
On May 6, 2005, the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) accepted the interlocutory appeal and
determined that the special appeal was to be proceeded with. Porto Seguro lodged an appeal
against the interlocutory decision, which was accepted by a majority vote on December 15, 2005,
and suspension of the special appeal filed by Petrobras was reinstated. The Company filed an
Interlocutory appeal against this latest decision, which was ruled on April 4, 2006 and which
unanimously overturned a decision which restored the impediment on the Special Appeal brought
by Petrobras, due to an impediment on one of the justices, determining another decision be
pronounced. Special Appeal by PORTO SEGURO rejected under a judgment delivered on September 05,
2006. In performance of the decision published on June 05, 2006, we are now awaiting assignment
of the agenda to re-examine the matter relating to the blocking of Petrobras Special Appeal.
If the award is not reversed, the indemnity estimated to PETROQUISA, including monetary
correction and interest, would be US$4,612. As Petrobras owns 100% of PETROQUISAs share
capital, a portion of the indemnity estimated at US$3,044, will not represent a disbursement
from Petrobras Group. In case of loss, Petrobras would have to pay US$201 to Porto Seguro and
US$922 to Lobo & Ideas by means of attorneys fees, however based on the opinion of its legal
advisers, the Company does not expect to obtain an unfavorable ruling in this case and
considers the risk of loss with respect to this lawsuit to be possible. |
F-95
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
19. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Continued) |
|
(a) |
|
Litigation (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Plaintiff: The Fishermans Federation of the State of Rio de Janeiro (FEPERJ) |
|
|
|
|
The Fishermans Federation of the State of Rio de Janeiro (FEPERJ) filed a civil suit against
the Company with the Rio de Janeiro State Court for compensation of miscellaneous damages
amounting to US$224, which it is claiming in the name of its members, as a result of the oil
spill in Guanabara Bay on January 18, 2000. At that time, Petrobras paid out extrajudicial
indemnification to everyone who proved to be fishermen when the accident occurred. According
to the records of the national fishermens register, only 3.339 could claim indemnification. A
decision was handed down on February 7, 2002 which ruled the claim partially without grounds,
rejecting pain and suffering, and requiring the Company to pay compensation for material
damages and loss of profit to be calculated at the award phase. The ruling expressly declares
that it is not reasonable to consider an award based on the amount claimed, since it was
without economic base. On February 02, 2007 a decision, partly accepting the expert report, was
published. That expert report was prepared to stablish the parameters for calculating the
award, which amounts to US$516 at that date. Petrobras will appeal before Rio de Janeiros
Supreme Court, because the parameters set in the decision differs from those already defined by
that same court. In accordance with the Companys expert assistant calculation, the recorded
amount of US$12 represents the award that will be set by the court at the end of the process.
Based on its legal counsels opinion, the Company ´s Administration believes it is possible that
the Company will not prevail in this case. |
|
|
|
|
Plaintiff: São Paulo State tax authorities |
|
|
|
|
The São Paulo tax authorities filed a tax suit against the Company, to demand payment of ICMS
on naphta-petrochemical operations carried out in the state for the period from September 1984
to February 1989. The suit was tried at all levels and the legal system eventually opposed the
argument defended by the Company, having understood that, in the specific case of these
operations, ICMS would apply. |
|
|
|
|
The case was settled and the Company entered into an agreement to pay US$122 plus interest,
totaling US$151, in 60 equal successive installments beginning April 2005. |
F-96
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
19. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Continued) |
|
(a) |
|
Litigation (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Plaintiff: São Paulo State tax authorities (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Taking advantage of the tax benefits awarded by Law 12.399/06, in November 2006 the Company
settled the debt in advance by paying the amount of US$53, reducing the fine amount by 80% and
the interest amount by 50%, generating a real saving of US$101. |
|
|
|
|
Plaintiff: Unions of Petroleum Workers |
|
|
|
|
Petrobras is a defendant in three labor claims filed by the UNIONS OF PETROLEUM WORKERS of
three federal states (Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo and Sergipe), alleging that official inflation
rates for 1987, 1989 and 1990 (understatement of the official inflation rate Bresser, Summer
and Collor Plans) were not fully included in the workers salaries. |
|
|
|
|
The suits are in different procedural phases, as described below: |
|
|
|
|
UNIONS OF PETROLEUM WORKERS of federal state of Sergipe (SINDIPETRO/SE): Case ruled to have
grounds. Process on enforcement phase. The judge granted decision determining SINDIPETRO/SE to
present new calculations, which is pending. This is awaited. The maximum exposure including
monetary restatement for Petrobras as of December 31, 2006 is US$47 calculations, which is
pending. Based on the opinion of its legal advisers, the Company considers the risk of loss
with respect to this lawsuit to be possible. |
|
|
|
|
UNIONS OF PETROLEUM WORKERS of federal state of Rio de Janeiro (SINDIPETRO/RJ): Petrobras
understands there is no debt, since corresponding amounts were paid by the clause of the
collective bargain in 1993. The maximum exposure including monetary restatement for Petrobras
as of December 31, 2006 is US$86. Based on the opinion of its legal advisers, the Company
considers the risk of loss with respect to this lawsuit to be remote. |
F-97
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
19. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Continued) |
|
(a) |
|
Litigation (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Plaintiff: Unions of Petroleum Workers (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
UNIONS OF PETROLEUM WORKERS of federal state of São Paulo (SINDIPETRO/SP): Case ruled to have
grounds, with final and unappealable decision delivered. Petrobras filed Termination Action -
denied. Appeal by Petrobras was accepted and decision granted suspending agreement and issuing
new decision to deny plaintiffs request on Labor Claim. Extraordinary Appeal filed by
SINDIPETRO, which was denied entertainment, and is now pending judgment on the Interlocutory
Appeal subsequently filed. |
|
|
|
|
The maximum exposure including monetary restatement for Petrobras as of December 31, 2006 is
US$45. Based on the opinion of its legal advisers, the Company considers the risk of loss with
respect to this lawsuit to be remote. |
|
|
|
|
Based on previous favorable ruling on similar cases and TST abridgment of law, Company
management does not expect an unfavorable outcome on the cases. Petrobras contested the expert
report determining the amount of indemnification, which is pending judgment. Management
assesses risk of loss to be possible. |
|
|
|
|
Plaintiff: Adailton de Oliveira Bittencourt and Others |
|
|
|
|
Adailton de Oliveira Bittencourt and Others, filed Labor claims for payment of break and lunch
hour, after introduction of 6 working hours per day by 1988 Brazilian Constitution. Period
claimed: September 28, 1989 to November 30, 1992 due to the introduction of a six-hour working
day by the 1988 Federal Constitution. Denied in first instance. Appeal granted by the Regional
Labor Tribunal (TRT). Petrobras filed appeal for clarification of decision, denied on
September 25, 2002 and October 24, 2002 respectively. A Motion for Clarification was lastly
filed on October 15, 2004 to obtain further clarification without changing the ruling. Final
and unappealable decision pronounced. The case is currently at the award calculation stage, at
which the amounts due to the plaintiffs are determined. The maximum exposure including
monetary restatement for Petrobras as of December 31, 2006 is US$3. Based on the opinion of its
legal advisers, the Company considers the risk of loss with respect to this lawsuit to be
possible. |
F-98
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
19. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Continued) |
|
(a) |
|
Litigation (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Plaintiff: Distribution Companies |
|
|
|
|
The Company was sued in court by certain small oil distribution companies under the allegation
that it does not pass on to state governments the State Value-Added Tax (ICMS) collected
according to the legislation upon fuel sales. These suits were filed in the states of Goiás,
Tocantins, Bahia, Pará, Maranhão and in the Federal District. |
|
|
|
|
Of the total amount related to legal actions of approximately US$419, up to December 31, 2006
some US$38 (US$34 in 2005) had been withdrawn from the Companys accounts as a result of
judicial rulings of advance relief, which were annulled as a result of an appeal filed by the
Company. |
|
|
|
|
The Company, with the support of the state and federal authorities, has succeeded in stopping
the execution of other withdrawals, and is making all possible efforts to obtain reimbursement
of the amounts that were previously withdrawn from its accounts. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Notification from the INSS joint liability |
|
|
|
|
The Company received various tax assessments related to social security amounts payable as a
result of irregularities in presentation of documentation required by the INSS, to eliminate
its joint liability in contracting civil construction and other services, stipulated in
paragraphs 5 and 6 of article 219 and paragraphs 2 and 3 of article 220 of Decree No. 3,048/99. |
|
|
|
|
In order to guarantee the appeals filing and/or the obtainment from INSS of Debt Clearance
Certificate, US$55 from the amounts disbursed by the Company is recorded as sheet as restricted
deposits for legal proceedings and guarantees and may be recovered under the respective
proceedings in progress, which are related to 343 assessments amounting to US$178. Petrobras
legal department expects a possible defeat regarding these assessments, as it considers the
risk of future disbursement to be possible. |
|
|
|
|
Petrobras had disbursed during 2006 US$35 (US$85 in 2005), referring to administrative suits
filed by the INSS claiming the Companys joint liability. |
F-99
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
19. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Notification from the INSS joint liability (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Internally, procedures were revised to improve the inspection of contracts and require the
presentation of documents, as stipulated in the legislation, to substantiate the payment of
INSS amounts due by contractors. Petrobras continues to analyze each tax assessment received in
order to recover amounts, as permitted through administrative processes of the INSS. |
|
|
(c) |
|
Tax assessments |
|
|
|
|
Plaintiff: Internal Revenue Service of Rio de Janeiro Withholding Tax related to charter of
vessels |
|
|
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service of Rio de Janeiro filed two Tax Assessments against the Company in
connection with Withholding Tax (IRRF) on foreign remittances of payments related to charter of
vessels of movable platform types for the years 1998 through 2002. |
|
|
|
|
The Internal Revenue Service, based on Law No. 9,537/97, Article 2, considers that drilling and
production platforms cannot be classified as sea-going vessels and therefore should not be
chartered but leased. Based on this interpretation, overseas remittances for servicing
chartering agreements would be subject to withholding tax at the rate of 15% or 25%. |
|
|
|
|
The Company disagrees with the Internal Revenue Services interpretation as to charter
contracts, given that the Federal Supreme Court has already ruled that, in the context of its
judgment with respect to the IPI (Federal VAT) tax, offshore platforms are to be classified as
sea-going vessels. Additionally, the 1994 and 1999 Income Tax Regulations support the
non-taxation (RIR/1994) and the zero tax rate (RIR/1999) for the remittances in question. |
|
|
|
|
On June 27, 2003, the Internal Revenue Service served a tax assessment notice on the Company
amounting to R$3,064 million (US$1,066) covering the period from 1999 to 2002. Using the same
arguments, on February 17, 2003, another tax assessment notice had already been issued for R$93
million (US$32) with respect to 1998, against which, on March 20, 2003, the Company filed an
appeal. According to the fiscal authorities, the Company should have withheld that tax,
incident on remittances made to abroad for payment of the hiring of vessels of the mobile
platform type, used in oil exploration and production. |
F-100
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
19. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Continued) |
|
(c) |
|
Tax assessments (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Plaintiff: Internal Revenue Service of Rio de Janeiro Withholding Tax related to charter of
vessels (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Petrobras has defended itself against these tax assessments. Administrative appeals were lodged
with High Court of Appeals for Fiscal Matters, last administrative level, which still await
trial. The maximum exposure including monetary restatement for Petrobras as of December 31,
2006 for the period 1998 is US$55 and for the period 1999 to 2002 is US$1,831. Based on its
legal counsels advice, the Company has assessed risk of loss to be possible. |
|
|
|
|
Plaintiff: Federal finance authorities State Value-Added Tax related to the Sinking of P-36
Platform |
|
|
|
|
Rio de Janeiro state finance authorities filed a Tax Assessment against the Company in
connection with State Value-Added Tax (ICMS) related to the Sinking of P-36 Platform. The
maximum exposure including monetary restatement for Petrobras as of December 31, 2006 is US$253
Petrobras filed a Voluntary Appeal, pending examination. To allow the appeal to proceed an
amount of US$20 was deposited and a bank guarantee to the amount of US$31 taken out, which
corresponds to 30% of the total amount. The voluntary appeal was accepted. However, the
assessment was upheld under the Special Appeal brought by the State Treasury. On October 02,
2006, the appeal deposit and bank guarantee were converted into income for the state. The
matter was then referred to the courts. The remaining amount deriving from the tax credit, duly
restated, relating to the final quarter of 2006 is around US$149, which corresponds to 70% of
the total claim. As the administrative proceedings have reached a conclusion and the amount
will be recorded as an overdue federal reliability, 20% will be added as attorneys fees. Based
on its legal counsels advice, the Company has assessed risk of loss to be possible. |
F-101
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
19. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Continued) |
|
(c) |
|
Tax assessments (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Plaintiff: Rio de Janeiro state finance authorities II and IPI Tax related to the Sinking of
P-36 Platform |
|
|
|
|
Rio de Janeiro state finance authorities filed a Tax Assessment against the Company in
connection with II (Import Tax) and IPI (Federal VAT) related to the Sinking of P-36 Platform.
Trial court ruling against Petrobras. An appeal was lodged, which is pending judgment.
Petrobras filed for a writ of mandamus and obtained an injunction that barred tax collection.
Pending special appeal filed by the Federal Reserve/National Finance Secretary. The maximum
exposure including monetary restatement for Petrobras as of December 31, 2006 is US$203. Due to
the favorable decision the Company obtained under the Writ of Mandamus, the administrative
proceeding has been stayed, meaning the parties have not had the chance to submit the Voluntary
Appeal. Based on its legal counsels advice, the Company has assessed risk of loss to be
possible. |
|
|
|
|
Plaintiff: Rio de Janeiro state finance authorities II and IPI Tax related to TERMORIO
equipments |
|
|
|
|
Rio de Janeiro state finance authorities filed a Tax Assessment against the Company in
connection with II (Import Tax) and IPI (Federal VAT) contesting the tax classification as
Other Electricity Generation Groups for the import of the equipment belonging to the
thermoelectric power station TERMORIO S.A. On August 15, 2006, TERMORIO submitted a
contestation of the tax assessment to the Federal Revenue Department. |
|
|
|
|
On September 15, 2006, the case was referred to the Federal Revenue Service in Florianópolis,
where it is still being examined under administrative proceedings. The maximum exposure
including monetary restatement for Petrobras as of December 31, 2006 is US$227. Based on its
legal counsels advice, the Company has assessed risk of loss to be possible. |
F-102
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
19. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Continued) |
|
(c) |
|
Tax assessments (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Plaintiff: Internal Revenue Services |
|
|
|
|
Internal Revenue Services denied PASEP base reduction. Internal Revenue Services Appeal denied
in 2nd instance and voluntary appeal of Petrobras accepted. Pending special appeal filed by the
Internal Revenue Services. The maximum exposure including monetary restatement for Petrobras as
of December 31, 2006 is US$13. Based on its legal counsels advice, the Company has assessed
risk of loss to be possible. |
|
|
|
|
Plaintiff Alagoas state finance authorities |
|
|
|
|
Alagoas state finance authorities filed a Tax Assessment against the Company in connection with
reversal of ICMS Credit. Petrobras is awaiting judgment of the appeal by the second
administrative level. The maximum exposure including monetary restatement for Petrobras as of
December 31, 2006 is US$32. Based on its legal counsels advice, the Company has assessed risk
of loss to be possible. |
|
|
(d) |
|
Environmental matters |
|
|
|
|
The Company is subject to various environmental laws and regulations. These laws regulate the
discharge of oil, gas or other materials into the environment and may require the Company to
remove or mitigate the environmental effects of the disposal or release of such materials at
various sites. |
|
|
|
|
The Companys management considers that any expenses incurred to correct or mitigate possible
environmental impacts should not have a significant effect on operations or cash flows. |
|
|
|
|
PEGASO (Programa de Excelência em Gestão Ambiental e Segurança Operacional). |
|
|
|
|
During 2000 the Company implemented an environmental excellence and operational safety program
PEGASO (Programa de Excelência em Gestão Ambiental e Segurança Operacional). The Company
made expenditures of approximately US$4,081 from 2000 to December 31, 2006 under this program.
During the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005 the Company made expenditures of
approximately US$562 and US$545 respectively. The Company believes that future payments related
to environmental clean-up activities resulting from these incidents, if any, will not be
material. |
F-103
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
19. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Continued) |
|
(d) |
|
Environmental matters (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Guanabara Bay pipeline rupture |
|
|
|
|
On January 18, 2000, a pipeline from one of the Companys terminals to a refinery in the
Guanabara Bay ruptured, causing a release of crude oil into the bay. On January 19, 2001, the
Rio de Janeiro State Prosecutor filed a criminal lawsuit against the Company. The Company is
contesting the legal basis for the criminal lawsuit. Additionally, the Federal Prosecutor has
filed criminal lawsuits against the former president of the Company (that finished) and 9 other
employees. The Company cannot predict if the outcome of these proceedings will have a material
adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or cash flows of the Company. |
|
|
|
|
The local federal tribunal dismissed the complaint against the Companys former president, and
this dismissal is not subject to appeal. |
|
|
|
|
On April 30, 2002, the judge determined that the Company could not appear as a defendant in
this criminal proceeding as a result of an injunction the Company obtained from the court,
although the decision is still subject to appeal. |
|
|
|
|
On October of 2003 the judge determined that in regard to one of the employees the suit will be
suspended for the period of 2 years, under certain conditions that defendant will have to
observe. |
|
|
|
|
In addition, as a result of the spill, on January 27, 2000, the National Council for the
Environment enacted a resolution that obligated the IBAMA (Brazilian Institute for the
Environment and Renewable Resources), state environmental agencies and local environmental
agencies and non-governmental agencies to evaluate the control and prevention measures and
environmental licensing status of all industrial facilities for the production of oil and oil
products in Brazil. This resolution also mandated that the Company perform an independent
environmental audit of all of its industrial installations located in the State of Rio de
Janeiro. |
|
|
|
|
Since 2000, the Company implemented independent environmental audits in all of the Companys
plants located in Brazil that was concluded during December of 2003. The Company implemented
almost all of the auditors recommendations. |
F-104
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
19. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Continued) |
|
(d) |
|
Environmental matters (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Presidente Getúlio Vargas refinery oil spill |
|
|
|
|
On July 16, 2000, an oil spill occurred at the Presidente Getúlio Vargas refinery releasing
crude oil in the surrounding area. The Federal and State of Paraná Prosecutors have filed a
civil lawsuit against the Company seeking US$1,176 in damages, which have already been
contested by the Company. Additionally, there are two other actions pending, one by the
Instituto Ambiental do Paraná (Paraná Environmental Institute) and by another civil association
called AMAR that have already been contested by the Company. Awaiting initiation of the expert
investigation to quantify the amount. The maximum exposure including monetary restatement for
Petrobras as of December 31, 2006 is US$39. The court determined that the suits brought by
AMAR and the Federal and State Prosecutors be tried as one. Based on its legal counsels advice,
the Companys Administration has assessed risk of loss to be possible. |
|
|
|
|
Cypriot flag vessel Vergina II collision |
|
|
|
|
On November 4, 2000, the Cypriot flag vessel Vergina II chartered by Petrobras collided with
the south pier at the Companys Almirante Barroso terminal in São Sebastião and spilled oil in
the São Sebastião canal. As a result of the accident, the Company was fined approximately US$30
by various local environmental agencies. The Company is currently contesting these fines. |
|
|
|
|
Araucária-Paranaguá pipeline rupture |
|
|
|
|
On February 16, 2001, the Companys Araucária-Paranaguá pipeline ruptured and as a result fuel
oil was spilled into the Sagrado, Meio, Neves and Nhundiaquara Rivers located in the state of
Paraná. As a result of the accident, the Company was fined approximately US$80 by the Instituto
Ambiental do Paraná (Paraná Environmental Institute), which was contested by the Company
through administrative proceeding but the appeal was rejected. The court determined that the
suits brought by AMAR and the Federal and State Prosecutors be tried as one. Based on its
legal counsels advice, the Companys Administration has assessed risk of loss to be possible. |
F-105
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
19. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Continued) |
|
(d) |
|
Environmental matters (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Oil spill related to the sinking of P-36 Platform |
|
|
|
|
On March 15, 2001, a spill resulting from the accident involving the P-36 platform occurred,
causing a release of diesel fuel and crude oil. The Company was fined by the IBAMA US$3 in
April of 2001 for the spill and improper use of chemicals to disperse the oil. The Company is
currently contesting these fines. |
|
|
|
|
Rupture of production line at well on the Belém Farm field |
|
|
|
|
On May 12, 2003, the rupture of a connection socket on a production line at well FZB-71, on the
Belém Farm field, in the city of Aracati-CE, resulted in the spill of approximately 7 (seven)
thousand liters of oil at an area located far from any communities or water sources. The
Companys Contingency Plan was immediately activated and cleaning work for the area was carried
out. Petrobras was charged with a penalty of US$0.04 by the Environment Superintendence of the
State of Ceará (Semace) and up to 90% of this amount can be reduced by compliance with a
Commitment Term entered into with the referred environmental entity. |
|
|
|
|
Fault in the connection of arms of vessel Nordic Marita, anchored at the Maritime Terminal
Almirante Barroso (Tebar), in São Sebastião, on the North coast of São Paulo |
|
|
|
|
On June 3, 2003, a fault in the connection of one of the unloading arms of vessel Nordic
Marita, anchored at the Maritime Terminal Almirante Barroso (Tebar), in São Sebastião, on the
North coast of São Paulo, caused a spill of approximately 27 thousand liters of oil from Campos
basin. As a result of this accident, Petrobras was charged with a penalty of US$0.17 by the
IBAMA and of US$0.12 by Basic Sanitation, Technology and Environment Protection Agency of the
State of São Paulo (CETESB). An appeal was filed against both charges based on the
understanding that the Company acted in the most efficient possible manner in order to minimize
possible impacts on the environment. |
F-106
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
19. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies (Continued) |
|
(d) |
|
Environmental matters (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
Rupture of a pipeline between Cabiúnas and Duque de Caxias Refinery |
|
|
|
|
On August 26, 2003, the rupture of a pipeline between TRANSPETROs terminal in Cabiúnas (Macaé)
and Duque de Caxias Refinery caused the spill of 20 (twenty) liters of oil in an area of the
city of Cachoeiras de Macacu. The Company immediately determined that the oil located in the
service area of the pipeline should be removed, and took preventive measures to protect a
creek, near to the Soarinhos River, with checks and oil-absorbing materials. In spite of the
effective procedures adopted by Petrobras and the non-existence of environmental damages, the
Company received a fine from IBAMA in the amount of US$0.69, but filed an administrative
proceeding with this entity. |
|
|
(e) |
|
Minimum operating lease payments |
|
|
|
|
The Company is committed to make the following minimum payments related to operating leases as
of December 31, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2,273 |
|
2009 |
|
|
1,527 |
|
2010 |
|
|
762 |
|
2011 |
|
|
402 |
|
2012 |
|
|
317 |
|
2013 and thereafter |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum operating lease payment commitments |
|
|
5,671 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company incurred US$2,016, US$1,417 and US$1,247, in rental expense on operating
leases at December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004, respectively. |
20. |
|
Derivative Instruments, Hedging and Risk Management Activities |
|
|
|
The Company is exposed to a number of market risks arising from its normal course of business.
Such market risks principally involve the possibility that changes in interest rates, foreign
currency exchange rates or commodity prices will adversely affect the value of the Companys
financial assets and liabilities or future cash flows and earnings. The Company maintains a
corporate risk management policy that is executed under the direction of the Companys executive
officers. |
F-107
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
20. |
|
Derivative Instruments, Hedging and Risk Management Activities (Continued) |
|
|
|
The Company may use derivative and non-derivative instruments to implement its corporate risk
management strategy. However, by using derivative instruments, the Company exposes itself to
credit and market risk. Credit risk is the failure of a counterparty to perform under the terms
of the derivative contract. Market risk is the possible adverse effect on the value of an assets
or liability, including financial instruments that results from changes in interest rates,
currency exchange rates, or commodity prices. The Company addresses credit risk by restricting
the counterparties to such derivative financial instruments to major financial institutions.
Market risk is managed by the Companys executive officers. The Company does not hold or issue
financial instruments for trading purposes. |
|
|
|
In 2004, the Petrobras Executive Board organized a Risk Management Committee comprising executive
managers of all business areas and of several corporate areas for the purpose of ensuring
integrated management of risk exposures and formalization of the main guidelines adopted by the
Company to manage significant risks and uncertainties associated with its activities. The Risk
Management Committee was created with a view towards concentrating risk management information
and discussions and facilitating communications with the Board of Directors and the Executive
Board. |
|
(a) |
|
Foreign currency risk management |
|
|
|
|
The Companys foreign currency risk management strategy may involve the use of derivative
instruments to protect against foreign exchange rate volatility which may impact the value of
certain of the Companys obligations. |
|
|
|
|
During 2000, the Company entered into three zero cost foreign exchange rate collars to reduce
its exposure to variations between the U.S. Dollar and the Japanese Yen, and between the U.S.
Dollar and the EURO, relative to long-term debt denominated in foreign currencies with a face
value of approximately US$470. The Company did not apply hedge accounting for these
relationships. The collars were constructed by the simultaneous purchase of a call option and
sale of a put option with the same counterparty and with equal premiums. |
F-108
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
20. |
|
Derivative Instruments, Hedging and Risk Management Activities (Continued) |
|
(a) |
|
Foreign currency risk management (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
These collars establish a price ceiling and a price floor for the associated exchange rates. If
the exchange rate falls below the floor, the counterparties will pay the Company the difference
between the spot rate at the maturity date and the floor, calculated based on the notional
amount of the contracts. Conversely, if the exchange rate increases above the ceiling, the
Company will pay the counterparties the difference between the spot rate at the maturity date
and the ceiling, calculated based on the notional amount of the contracts on the notional
amount. The maturity dates of the derivatives contracts coincide with the maturity dates of
each of the notes. |
|
|
|
|
The Yen zero cost collar contracts were settled on September 8, 2003, with a cash payment of
US$68. One of the Euro zero cost collars was settled on December 31, 2004, with a cash receipt
of US$18. |
|
|
|
|
The call option component of the Companys zero cost foreign exchange collars at December 31,
2006 had a fair value of US$21 (US$12 at December 31, 2005) and the put option components a
fair value of zero at December 31, 2006 (US$(1) at December 31, 2005). |
|
|
(b) |
|
Commodity price risk management |
|
|
|
|
Petroleum and oil products |
|
|
|
|
The Company is exposed to commodity price risks as a result of the fluctuation of crude oil and
oil product prices. The Companys commodity risk management activities are primarily
undertaking through the uses of future contracts traded on stock exchanges; and options and
swaps entered into with major financial institutions. The futures contracts provide economic
hedges for anticipated crude oil purchases and sales, generally forecasted to occur within a 30
to 360 day period, and reduce the Companys exposure to volatility of such prices. |
|
|
|
|
The Companys exposure from these contracts is limited to the difference between the contract
value and market value on the volumes contracted. Crude oil future contracts are
marked-to-market and related gains and losses are recognized in currently period earnings,
irrespective of when the physical crude sales occur. For the years ended December 31, 2006,
2005 and 2004, the Company entered into commodity derivative transactions for 26.42%, 26.79%
and 33.06%, respectively, of its total import and export trade volumes. |
F-109
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
20. |
|
Derivative Instruments, Hedging and Risk Management Activities (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Commodity price risk management (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The open positions in the futures market, compared to spot market values, resulted in
recognized losses of US$2, US$1 and US$2 for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004,
respectively. |
|
|
|
|
A long-term position was opened in January 2001 via the sale of put options for 52 million
barrels of West Texas Intermediate (WTI) oil, over a period extending from 2004 to 2007, with
the objective of obtaining price protection for this quantity of oil and to provide the funding
institutions of the Barracuda/Caratinga project with a minimum guaranteed margin to cover the
debt servicing. The put options were structured to ensure that the financial institutions
participating in the financing of the development of the fields receive the price required to
generate the minimum required return on investment. The Company accounts for the put options on
a mark to market basis. During 2006, 2005 and 2004 the Company realized no gain or loss. |
|
|
(c) |
|
Interest rate risk management |
|
|
|
|
The Companys interest rate risk is a function of the Companys long-term debt and to a lesser
extent, its short-term debt. The Companys foreign currency floating rate debt is principally
subject to fluctuations in LIBOR and the Companys floating rate debt denominated in Reais is
principally subject to fluctuations in the Brazilian long-term interest rate (TJLP) as fixed by
the National Monetary Counsel. The Company currently does not utilize derivative financial
instruments to manage its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates. However, the Company will
consider assessing the use of various types of derivatives to reduce its exposure to interest
rate fluctuations and may use such financial instruments in the future. |
F-110
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
20. |
|
Derivative Instruments, Hedging and Risk Management Activities (Continued) |
|
(d) |
|
Risk Management activity at PEPSA |
|
|
|
|
PEPSA uses derivative instruments such as options, swaps and others, mainly to mitigate the
risk of changes in crude oil prices, interest rates and foreign exchange rates. Such derivative
instruments are designed to mitigate specific exposures, and when designated as accounting
hedges are assessed periodically to assure high correlation of the derivative instrument to the
hedged risk exposure identified and to ensure that the derivative is highly effective in
achieving offsetting changes in the cash flows of the hedged risk. PEPSA in the past designated
certain relationships as accounting hedges for its crude oil derivative instruments and its
interest rate swaps derivative instruments, but holds no such instruments at December 31, 2006;
nor are any implemented accounting hedges outstanding. |
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, PEPSA did not have commodity derivative transactions that qualify for
hedge accounting purposes in accordance with SFAS No. 133 Accounting for Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133). PEPSA accounted for a loss of US$103 for the
year ended December 31, 2005 due to derivative financial instruments that did not qualify for
hedge accounting. |
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006, PEPSA had forward sales of US dollars in exchange for Argentine pesos.
During the current fiscal year, the Company recognized a US$2 gain. As of December 31, 2006 and
2005 the face value of effective contracts amounts to US$18 and US$52, respectively, at the
average exchange rate of 3.26 and 3 Argentine pesos per US dollar, respectively. Without
considering the above-mentioned operations, as of December 31, 2006, the Company did not have
any other positions in derivatives instruments. |
|
|
(e) |
|
Cash flow hedge |
|
|
|
|
In September, 2006 PIFCo entered into cross currency swap under which it swaps principal and
interest payments on Yen denominated bonds for U.S. dollar amounts. Under U.S. GAAP, foreign
currency cash flow hedges can only be designated as such when hedging the risk to the entitys
functional currency, and therefore, this cross currency swaps is qualified for hedge accounting
designation take into account that PIFCos functional currency is the US dollar, and the
assessment of hedge effectiveness indicates that the change in fair value of the designated
hedging instrument is highly effective. |
F-111
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
20. |
|
Derivative Instruments, Hedging and Risk Management Activities (Continued) |
|
(e) |
|
Cash flow hedge (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The hedged item is ¥ 35 billion bond, ten-year maturity, carrying a semi-annual coupon of 2.15%
p.a. The hedge instrument is a cross currency swap, ten year maturity, under which US dollars is
paid and Japanese Yen is received mirroring the Yen bond conditions. The effectiveness test was
made at the inception at the hedge based on the hypothetical derivative method. The
effectiveness test will be made on an ongoing basis on a quarterly basis. |
|
|
|
|
The transaction gain or loss arising from the remeasurement of Yen denominated bonds is offset
by the reclassification relating to the remeasurement of the hedged item at spot rates from
other comprehensive income to earnings. The cross currency swap at December 31, 2006 had a fair
value of (US$9) due to the devaluation of the Japanese Yen when compared to US dollar since the
inception of the instrument. |
21. |
|
Natural Gas Derivative Contract |
|
|
|
In connection with the long-term contract to buy gas (The Gas Supply Agreement or GSA) to
supply thermoelectric plants and for other uses in Brazil, the Company entered into a contract,
with the company Empresa Petrolera ANDINA, a gas producer in Bolivia, that constituted a
derivative financial instrument under SFAS 133. This contract, the Natural Gas Price Volatility
Reduction Contract (the PVRC), was executed with the purpose of reducing the effects of price
volatility under the GSA. |
|
|
|
The terms of the PVRC provided for a price collar for the period from 2005 to 2019, with the
Company receiving cash payments when the calculated price is above the established ceiling, and
the Company making cash payments when the price is below the established floor, with no cash
payments being made when the price is between the ceiling and the floor. |
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005, the Company recorded an asset based on the fair value of the derivative
in the amount of US$547 and a liability of US$144, which was deemed a deferred purchase
incentive. |
F-112
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
21. |
|
Natural Gas Derivative Contract (Continued) |
|
|
|
Due to the new Hydrocarbons Law of Bolivia (see Note 9(b)), the other party to the PVRC contested
the contract, alleging among others, force majeure and excessive onus. On August 12, 2006, the
parties agreed to cancel the PVRC. As a result, on August 14, 2006 the Company received US$41 and
wrote-off accounts receivable related to the PVRC amounting to US$77. |
|
|
|
The Company adjusted the fair value asset and liabilities related to the PVRC by recording a
financial expense of US$328 during the first quarter of 2006 as a result of the tax increases in
Bolivia. In the second quarter of 2006, the Company wrote-off the remaining fair value asset of
US$94 as a consequence of the cancellation of contract. |
22. |
|
Financial Instruments |
|
|
|
In the normal course of its business activities, the Company acquires various types of financial
instruments. |
|
(a) |
|
Concentrations of credit risk |
|
|
|
|
Substantial portions of the Companys assets including financial instruments are located in
Brazil while substantially all of the Companys revenues and net income are generated in
Brazil. The Companys financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk
consist primarily of its cash and cash equivalents, government securities, the Petroleum and
Alcohol account, trade receivables and futures contracts. |
|
|
|
|
The Company takes several measures to reduce its credit risk to acceptable levels. All cash and
cash equivalents in Brazil are maintained with major banks. Time deposits in U.S. dollars are
placed with creditworthy institutions in the United States. Additionally, all of the Companys
available-for-sale securities and derivative contracts are either exchange traded or maintained
with creditworthy financial institutions. The Company monitors its credit risk associated with
trade receivables by routinely assessing the creditworthiness of its customers. At December 31,
2006 and December 31, 2005, the Companys trade receivables were primarily maintained with
large distributors. |
F-113
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
22. |
|
Financial Instruments (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
Fair values are derived either from quoted market prices where available, or, in their absence,
the present value of expected cash flows. Fair values reflect the cash that would have been
either received or paid if the instruments were settled at year end in an arms length
transaction between willing parties. Fair values of cash and cash equivalents, trade
receivables, the Petroleum and Alcohol account, short-term debt and trade payables approximate
their carrying values. The fair value for the Companys available-for-sale government
securities equals their carrying value. |
|
|
|
|
The fair values of other long-term receivables and payables do not differ materially from their
carrying values. |
|
|
|
|
The Companys debt including project financing obligations, resulting from FIN 46(R)
consolidation amounted to US$14,702 at December 31, 2006 and US$15,132 at December 31, 2005 and
had estimated fair values of US$13,984 and U$15,239, respectively. |
23. |
|
Segment Information |
|
|
|
The following segment information has been prepared in accordance with SFAS No. 131 Disclosure
about Segments of an Enterprise and Related information (SFAS 131). The Company operates under
the following segments, which are described as follows: |
|
|
|
Exploration and Production This segment includes the Companys exploration, production
development and production activities of oil, liquefied natural gas and natural gas in
Brazil, for the purpose of supplying refineries in Brazil as well as selling surplus
Brazilian production in domestic and foreign markets and limited oil trading activities and
transfers of natural gas to the Companys Gas and Energy segment. |
|
|
|
|
Supply This segment includes the Companys refining, logistic, transportation,
exportation and the purchase of crude oil, as well as the purchase and commercialization
activities for oil, oil products and fuel alcohol. Additionally, this segment includes
petrochemical and fertilizers division, which includes investments in domestic petrochemical
companies and the Companys two domestic fertilizer plants. |
|
|
|
Distribution This segment represents the oil product and fuel alcohol distribution
activities conducted by the Companys majority owned subsidiary, Petrobras Distribuidora
S.A. BR in Brazil. In accordance with the Companys strategic objectives to increase
market share in the LPG distribution segment and consolidate the automotive fuels
distribution market in certain regions of Brazil, its distribution business includes the
operations of Liquigás Distribuidora S.A (formerly known as Sophia do Brasil S.A. and Agip
do Brasil S.A.), which was acquired on August 9, 2004. |
|
|
|
|
Gas and Energy This segment currently encompasses the purchase, sale, transportation
and distribution of natural gas produced in or imported into Brazil. Additionally, this
segment includes the Companys participation in domestic electricity production, including
investments in domestic natural gas transportation companies, state owned natural gas
distributors and thermoelectric companies. |
|
|
|
|
International This segment represents the Companys international Exploration and
Production, Supply, Distribution and Gas and Energy activities conducted in 15 countries
outside Brazil . |
|
|
The items that cannot be attributed to the other areas are allocated to the group of corporate
entities, especially those linked with corporate financial management, overhead related with
central administration and other expenses, including actuarial expenses related with the pension
and health-care plans for non-active participants. |
|
|
|
The accounting information by business area was prepared based on the assumption of
controllability, for the purpose of attribution to the business areas only items over which these
areas have effective control. |
|
|
|
The main criteria used to record the results and assets by business segments are summarized as
follows: |
F-114
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
23. |
|
Segment Information (Continued) |
|
|
|
Net operating revenues: these were considered to be the revenues from sales to third
parties, plus revenues between the business segments, based on the internal transfer prices
established by the areas; |
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses includes the costs of products and services sold, calculated per
business segment, based on the internal transfer price and the other operating costs of each
segment, as well as operating expenses, based on the expenses actually incurred in each
segment; |
|
|
|
|
Assets: covers the assets relating to each segment. |
|
|
The following presents the Companys assets by segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas and |
|
|
(see separate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
|
Supply |
|
|
Energy |
|
|
disclosure) |
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
Current assets (1) |
|
|
2,966 |
|
|
|
9,668 |
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
|
1,978 |
|
|
|
15,413 |
|
|
|
(2,697 |
) |
|
|
30,955 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,688 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
2,966 |
|
|
|
9,668 |
|
|
|
1,256 |
|
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
|
1,978 |
|
|
|
2,725 |
|
|
|
(2,697 |
) |
|
|
18,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in non-consolidated companies
and other investments |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
33,979 |
|
|
|
9,828 |
|
|
|
6,828 |
|
|
|
5,722 |
|
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
1,072 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,897 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non current assets |
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
1,119 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
2,523 |
|
|
|
(487 |
) |
|
|
5,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petroleum and Alcohol account |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
368 |
|
Government securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
479 |
|
Other assets (1) |
|
|
1,388 |
|
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
1,119 |
|
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
1,676 |
|
|
|
(487 |
) |
|
|
4,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
38,366 |
|
|
|
20,820 |
|
|
|
9,597 |
|
|
|
10,274 |
|
|
|
3,675 |
|
|
|
19,132 |
|
|
|
(3,184 |
) |
|
|
98,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In order to align the financial statements of each business segment with the best practices
of companies in the Oil & Gas sector and to improve the understanding of Petrobras management, the
Company, since the first quarter of 2006, switched to allocating all financial results and items of
financial nature to the corporate level. |
F-115
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
23. Segment Information (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
|
Supply |
|
|
Energy |
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
Current assets (1) |
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
(1,441 |
) |
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
1,019 |
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
219 |
|
|
|
(1,441 |
) |
|
|
2,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in non-consolidated companies
and other investments |
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
280 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
4,436 |
|
|
|
834 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
5,722 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non current assets |
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
(853 |
) |
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets (1) |
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
669 |
|
|
|
(853 |
) |
|
|
460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
7,458 |
|
|
|
2,249 |
|
|
|
1,499 |
|
|
|
375 |
|
|
|
1,007 |
|
|
|
(2,314 |
) |
|
|
10,274 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In order to align the financial statements of each business segment with the best practices
of companies in the Oil & Gas sector and to improve the understanding of Petrobras management, the
Company, since the first quarter of 2006, switched to allocating all financial results and items of
financial nature to the corporate level. |
F-116
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
23. |
|
Segment Information(Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas and |
|
|
(see separate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
|
Supply |
|
|
Energy |
|
|
disclosure) |
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
Current assets (1) |
|
|
2,770 |
|
|
|
8,116 |
|
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
1,918 |
|
|
|
12,644 |
|
|
|
(2,531 |
) |
|
|
25,784 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,871 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,871 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
2,770 |
|
|
|
8,116 |
|
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
1,918 |
|
|
|
2,773 |
|
|
|
(2,531 |
) |
|
|
15,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in non-consolidated companies
and other investments |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
822 |
|
|
|
438 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
25,876 |
|
|
|
8,098 |
|
|
|
5,328 |
|
|
|
4,655 |
|
|
|
1,238 |
|
|
|
768 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
45,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non current assets |
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
5,124 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petroleum and Alcohol account |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329 |
|
Government securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
364 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
364 |
|
Other assets (1) |
|
|
971 |
|
|
|
396 |
|
|
|
1,349 |
|
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
(223 |
) |
|
|
4,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
29,626 |
|
|
|
17,432 |
|
|
|
8,167 |
|
|
|
7,347 |
|
|
|
3,568 |
|
|
|
15,295 |
|
|
|
(2,797 |
) |
|
|
78,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In order to align the financial statements of each business segment with the best
practices of companies in the Oil & Gas sector and to improve the understanding of Petrobras
management, the Company, since the first quarter of 2006, switched to allocating all financial
results and items of financial nature to the corporate level. |
F-117
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
23. |
|
Segment Information (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gas and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
|
Supply |
|
|
Energy |
|
|
Distribution |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Eliminations |
|
|
Total |
|
Current assets (1) |
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
(1,182 |
) |
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
1,486 |
|
|
|
660 |
|
|
|
552 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
(1,182 |
) |
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in non-consolidated companies
and other investments |
|
|
141 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
3,801 |
|
|
|
530 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
4,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non current assets |
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
2,173 |
|
|
|
(2,310 |
) |
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets (1) |
|
|
483 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
2,173 |
|
|
|
(2,310 |
) |
|
|
459 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
5,911 |
|
|
|
1,275 |
|
|
|
1,005 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
2,481 |
|
|
|
(3,497 |
) |
|
|
7,347 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In order to align the financial statements of each business segment with the best practices of
companies in the Oil & Gas sector and to improve the understanding of Petrobras management, the
Company, since the first quarter of 2006, switched to allocating all financial results and items of
financial nature to the corporate level. |
F-118
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
23. |
|
Segment Information (Continued) |
|
|
|
Revenues and net income by segment are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
Gas and |
|
(see separate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
Supply |
|
Energy |
|
disclosure) |
|
Distribution |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
Net operating revenues to third parties |
|
|
3,351 |
|
|
|
42,831 |
|
|
|
2,833 |
|
|
|
4,938 |
|
|
|
18,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72,347 |
|
Inter-segment net operating revenues |
|
|
32,387 |
|
|
|
15,128 |
|
|
|
1,257 |
|
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,192 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenues |
|
|
35,738 |
|
|
|
57,959 |
|
|
|
4,090 |
|
|
|
6,071 |
|
|
|
18,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(50,192 |
) |
|
|
72,347 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(13,635 |
) |
|
|
(51,802 |
) |
|
|
(3,531 |
) |
|
|
(4,088 |
) |
|
|
(16,967 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
49,962 |
|
|
|
(40,061 |
) |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
(2,166 |
) |
|
|
(669 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
(417 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,673 |
) |
Exploration, including exploratory dry holes |
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(934 |
) |
Impairment |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(465 |
) |
|
|
(1,357 |
) |
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
(540 |
) |
|
|
(982 |
) |
|
|
(1,306 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(4,989 |
) |
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(346 |
) |
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(155 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(727 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
(662 |
) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(1,081 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
(17,155 |
) |
|
|
(54,009 |
) |
|
|
(4,436 |
) |
|
|
(5,503 |
) |
|
|
(18,174 |
) |
|
|
(2,204 |
) |
|
|
49,995 |
|
|
|
(51,486 |
) |
Equity in results of non-consolidated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
|
Financial income (expenses), net (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
Employee benefit expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,017 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,017 |
) |
Other taxes |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
(285 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(594 |
) |
Other expenses, net |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes, minority interest,
extraordinary item and accounting change |
|
|
18,465 |
|
|
|
3,862 |
|
|
|
(411 |
) |
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
|
|
(3,581 |
) |
|
|
(197 |
) |
|
|
19,161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefits (expense) |
|
|
(6,278 |
) |
|
|
(1,312 |
) |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
2,100 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
(5,691 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in results of consolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
(229 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the year |
|
|
11,958 |
|
|
|
2,540 |
|
|
|
(502 |
) |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
(1,461 |
) |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
12,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In order to align the financial statements of each business segment with the best practices
of companies in the Oil & Gas sector and to improve the understanding of Petrobras
management, the Company, since the first quarter of 2006, switched to allocating all financial
results and items of financial nature to the corporate level. |
F-119
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
23. |
|
Segment Information (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
International |
|
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
Gas and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
Supply |
|
Energy |
|
Distribution |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
Net operating revenues to third parties |
|
|
685 |
|
|
|
2,068 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
1,440 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,938 |
|
Inter-segment net operating revenues |
|
|
1,831 |
|
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,195 |
) |
|
|
1,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenues |
|
|
2,516 |
|
|
|
3,518 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
1,446 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(2,195 |
) |
|
|
6,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(948 |
) |
|
|
(3,307 |
) |
|
|
(577 |
) |
|
|
(1,433 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
2,203 |
|
|
|
(4,088 |
) |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(417 |
) |
Exploration, including exploratory dry holes |
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(433 |
) |
Impairment |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
(85 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(540 |
) |
Research and development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
(1,849 |
) |
|
|
(3,453 |
) |
|
|
(595 |
) |
|
|
(1,539 |
) |
|
|
(270 |
) |
|
|
2,203 |
|
|
|
(5,503 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in results of non-consolidated companies |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
Other expenses, net |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes, minority interest,
and accounting change |
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
(324 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefits (expense) |
|
|
(305 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(255 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in results of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
(172 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for the year |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(205 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-120
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
23. |
|
Segment Information (Continued) |
|
|
|
Revenues and net income by segment are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
Gas and |
|
(see separate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production (1) |
|
Supply (1) |
|
Energy |
|
disclosure) |
|
Distribution |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
Net operating revenues to third parties |
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
33,229 |
|
|
|
1,932 |
|
|
|
3,647 |
|
|
|
15,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56,324 |
|
Inter-segment net operating revenues |
|
|
26,950 |
|
|
|
12,286 |
|
|
|
1,232 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,573 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenues |
|
|
28,824 |
|
|
|
45,515 |
|
|
|
3,164 |
|
|
|
4,527 |
|
|
|
15,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(41,573 |
) |
|
|
56,324 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(11,327 |
) |
|
|
(40,033 |
) |
|
|
(2,484 |
) |
|
|
(2,425 |
) |
|
|
(14,357 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,798 |
|
|
|
(29,828 |
) |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
(1,571 |
) |
|
|
(644 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(461 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,926 |
) |
Exploration, including exploratory dry holes |
|
|
(860 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,009 |
) |
Impairment |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(156 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
(1,195 |
) |
|
|
(612 |
) |
|
|
(424 |
) |
|
|
(914 |
) |
|
|
(1,026 |
) |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(4,474 |
) |
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(153 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(399 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(45 |
) |
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
(475 |
) |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
(739 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,453 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
(14,336 |
) |
|
|
(42,057 |
) |
|
|
(3,698 |
) |
|
|
(3,718 |
) |
|
|
(15,313 |
) |
|
|
(1,976 |
) |
|
|
40,853 |
|
|
|
(40,245 |
) |
Equity in results of non-consolidated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139 |
|
Financial income (expenses), net (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(231 |
) |
Employee benefit expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(994 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(994 |
) |
Other taxes |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(373 |
) |
Other expenses, net |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes, minority interest
extraordinary item and accounting change |
|
|
14,453 |
|
|
|
3,429 |
|
|
|
(512 |
) |
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
(3,382 |
) |
|
|
(720 |
) |
|
|
14,592 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefits (expense) |
|
|
(4,914 |
) |
|
|
(1,163 |
) |
|
|
193 |
|
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
1,647 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
(4,441 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in results of consolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
(70 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before effect of change in accounting
principle |
|
|
9,469 |
|
|
|
2,245 |
|
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
(1,548 |
) |
|
|
(475 |
) |
|
|
10,186 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extraordinary gain net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income for the year |
|
|
9,469 |
|
|
|
2,245 |
|
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
311 |
|
|
|
(1,390 |
) |
|
|
(475 |
) |
|
|
10,344 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In 2005 revenues from commercialization of oil to third parties are being classified in
accordance with the points of sale, which could be Exploration & Production or Supply
segments. Until 2004, revenues from commercialization of oil were completely allocated to
Exploration & Production. This classification generated no significant impact on the
results reported for these segments and segments information has not been restated as it is
impractical to gather and collect data for prior periods as to point of sale. |
|
(2) |
|
In order to align the financial statements of each business segment with the best
practices of companies in the Oil & Gas sector and to improve the understanding of
Petrobras management, the Company, since the first quarter of 2006, switched to allocating
all financial results and items of financial nature to the corporate level. |
F-121
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
23. |
|
Segment Information (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
International |
|
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
Gas and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
Supply |
|
Energy |
|
Distribution |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
Net operating revenues to third parties |
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
1,079 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
1,090 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,647 |
|
Inter-segment net operating revenues |
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
1,279 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,910 |
) |
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenues |
|
|
2,396 |
|
|
|
2,358 |
|
|
|
567 |
|
|
|
1,094 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
(1,910 |
) |
|
|
4,527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(665 |
) |
|
|
(2,151 |
) |
|
|
(452 |
) |
|
|
(1,020 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
1,885 |
|
|
|
(2,425 |
) |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(461 |
) |
Exploration, including exploratory dry holes |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
Impairment |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(134 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(166 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(424 |
) |
Research and development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
(1,568 |
) |
|
|
(2,265 |
) |
|
|
(464 |
) |
|
|
(1,105 |
) |
|
|
(249 |
) |
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
(3,718 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in results of non-consolidated companies |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
Other expenses, net |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes, minority interest,
extraordinary item and accounting change |
|
|
813 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefits (expense) |
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(289 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in results of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for the year |
|
|
553 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In order to align the financial statements of each business segment with the best
practices of companies in the Oil & Gas sector and to improve the understanding of
Petrobras management, the Company, since the first quarter of 2006, switched to allocating
all financial results and items of financial nature to the corporate level. |
F-122
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
23. |
|
Segment Information (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004 |
|
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And |
|
|
|
|
|
Gas and |
|
(see separate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
Supply |
|
Energy |
|
Disclosure) |
|
Distribution |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
Net operating revenues to third parties |
|
|
2,487 |
|
|
|
20,981 |
|
|
|
1,547 |
|
|
|
3,085 |
|
|
|
10,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,428 |
|
Inter-segment net operating revenues |
|
|
16,384 |
|
|
|
7,786 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenues |
|
|
18,871 |
|
|
|
28,767 |
|
|
|
2,021 |
|
|
|
3,604 |
|
|
|
10,486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25,321 |
) |
|
|
38,428 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(7,093 |
) |
|
|
(25,915 |
) |
|
|
(1,995 |
) |
|
|
(1,871 |
) |
|
|
(9,470 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,065 |
|
|
|
(21,279 |
) |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
(1,322 |
) |
|
|
(548 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
(423 |
) |
|
|
(59 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,481 |
) |
Exploration, including exploratory dry holes |
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(613 |
) |
Impairment |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
(960 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(334 |
) |
|
|
(567 |
) |
|
|
(627 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,901 |
) |
Research and development expenses |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(248 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(480 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
(9,200 |
) |
|
|
(27,533 |
) |
|
|
(2,484 |
) |
|
|
(2,872 |
) |
|
|
(10,176 |
) |
|
|
(867 |
) |
|
|
25,065 |
|
|
|
(28,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in results of non-consolidated companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172 |
|
Financial income (expenses), net (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(327 |
) |
Employee benefit expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(650 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(650 |
) |
Other taxes |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(440 |
) |
Other expenses, net |
|
|
(117 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(181 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes, minority interest,
extraordinary item and accounting change |
|
|
9,542 |
|
|
|
1,245 |
|
|
|
(433 |
) |
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
(2,184 |
) |
|
|
(256 |
) |
|
|
8,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefits (expense) |
|
|
(3,244 |
) |
|
|
(419 |
) |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
1,312 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
(2,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in results of consolidated
subsidiaries |
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(514 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for the year |
|
|
5,949 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
(347 |
) |
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
(804 |
) |
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
6,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In order to align the financial statements of each business segment with the best
practices of companies in the Oil & Gas sector and to improve the understanding of
Petrobras management, the Company, since the first quarter of 2006, switched to allocating
all financial results and items of financial nature to the corporate level. |
F-123
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
23. |
|
Segment Information (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004 |
|
|
International |
|
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
Gas and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
Supply |
|
Energy |
|
Distribution |
|
Corporate |
|
Eliminations |
|
Total |
Net operating revenues to third parties |
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,085 |
|
Inter-segment net operating revenues |
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,685 |
) |
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating revenues |
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
2,160 |
|
|
|
431 |
|
|
|
880 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
(1,685 |
) |
|
|
3,604 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
(461 |
) |
|
|
(1,797 |
) |
|
|
(337 |
) |
|
|
(940 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
|
(1,871 |
) |
Depreciation, depletion and amortization |
|
|
(326 |
) |
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(423 |
) |
Exploration, including exploratory dry holes
and impairment |
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(194 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(111 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(99 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(334 |
) |
Research and development expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
(1,167 |
) |
|
|
(1,904 |
) |
|
|
(349 |
) |
|
|
(1,012 |
) |
|
|
(121 |
) |
|
|
1,681 |
|
|
|
(2,872 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in results of non-consolidated companies |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92 |
|
Other taxes |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
Other expenses, net |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes, minority interest,
extraordinary item and accounting change |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
(139 |
) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefits (expense) |
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest in results of consolidated subsidiaries |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for the year |
|
|
504 |
|
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In order to align the financial statements of each business segment with the best
practices of companies in the Oil & Gas sector and to improve the understanding of
Petrobras management, the Company, since the first quarter of 2006, switched to allocating
all financial results and items of financial nature to the corporate level. |
F-124
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
23. |
|
Segment Information (Continued) |
|
|
|
Capital expenditures incurred by segment for the years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
are as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Exploration and Production |
|
|
7,329 |
|
|
|
6,127 |
|
|
|
4,574 |
|
Supply |
|
|
1,936 |
|
|
|
1,749 |
|
|
|
1,367 |
|
Gas and Energy |
|
|
1,664 |
|
|
|
694 |
|
|
|
782 |
|
International |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration and Production |
|
|
2,304 |
|
|
|
1,067 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
Supply |
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Gas and Energy |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Distribution |
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
726 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,643 |
|
|
|
10,365 |
|
|
|
7,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys gross sales, classified by geographic destination, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Brazil |
|
|
70,733 |
|
|
|
57,669 |
|
|
|
40,905 |
|
International |
|
|
23,160 |
|
|
|
16,396 |
|
|
|
11,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,893 |
|
|
|
74,065 |
|
|
|
51,954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total amounts sold of products and services to the two major customers in 2006 were
US$7,978 and US$5,689 (US$6,258 and US$4,594 in 2005; and US$4,269 and US$3,108 in 2004).
F-125
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
24. |
|
Related Party Transactions |
The Company is controlled by the Federal Government and has numerous transactions with other
state-owned companies in the ordinary course of its business.
Transactions with major related parties resulted in the following balances:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
PETROS (pension fund) |
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Banco do Brasil S.A. |
|
|
5,014 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
5,944 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
BNDES (Note 12 (b)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
589 |
|
BNDES (Project financing) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,336 |
|
Federal Government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
966 |
|
Restricted deposits for legal
Proceedings |
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government securities |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
|
|
Petroleum and Alcohol account receivable
from Federal Government (Note 11) |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
1,926 |
|
|
|
776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,390 |
|
|
|
5,241 |
|
|
|
9,467 |
|
|
|
3,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
5,382 |
|
|
|
2,957 |
|
|
|
7,458 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
2,284 |
|
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-126
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
24. |
|
Related Party Transactions (Continued) |
|
|
|
These balances are included in the following balance sheet classifications: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
|
Assets |
|
Liabilities |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
4,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,908 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable (Note 6) |
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current assets |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable (Note 6) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government securities |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
|
|
Petroleum and Alcohol account -
receivable
from Federal Government (Note 11) |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted deposits for legal
proceedings |
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
637 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pension fund |
|
|
479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
362 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
723 |
|
Dividends and interest on capital payable
to Federal Government |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,743 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
966 |
|
Current portion of project financings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,342 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
545 |
|
Project financings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
825 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
696 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,390 |
|
|
|
5,241 |
|
|
|
9,467 |
|
|
|
3,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-127
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
24. |
|
Related Party Transactions (Continued) |
|
|
|
The principal amounts of business and financial operations carried out with related parties are
as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
|
|
Income |
|
Expense |
|
Income |
|
Expense |
|
Income |
|
Expense |
Sales of products and services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRASKEM S.A. |
|
|
1,788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,049 |
|
|
|
|
|
COPESUL S.A. |
|
|
1,132 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
|
|
Manaus Energia S.A. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petroquímica União S.A. |
|
|
588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
Others |
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
954 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Petroleum and Alcohol
account receivable from
Federal
Government (Note 11) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Government securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Financial expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Other expenses, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(262 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,905 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
3,756 |
|
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
2,856 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25. |
|
Accounting for Suspended Exploratory Wells |
The Companys accounting for exploratory drilling costs is governed by Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 19, Financial Accounting and Reporting by Oil and Gas Producing
Companies (SFAS No. 19). On April 4, 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
issued FASB Staff Position (FSP FAS 19-1) that amended SFAS No. 19 with respect to the deferral
of exploratory drilling costs. The Company adopted FASB Staff Position FAS 19-1) Accounting
for Suspended Wells Costs effective from January 1, 2005. There was no material impact at
adoption.
F-128
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
25. |
|
Accounting for Suspended Exploratory Wells (Continued) |
|
|
|
Costs the Company has incurred to drill exploratory wells that find commercial quantities of
oil and gas are carried as assets on its balance sheet under the classification Property,
plant and equipment as unproved oil and gas properties. Each year, the Company writes off the
costs of these wells that have not found sufficient proved reserves to justify completion as a
producing well, unless (1) the well is in an area requiring major capital expenditure before
production can begin and (2) additional exploratory drilling is under way or firmly planned to
determine whether the capital expenditure is justified. |
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, the total amount of unproved oil and gas properties was US$2,054, and
of that amount US$321 (US$195 of which related to projects in Brazil) represented costs that
had been capitalized for more than one year, which generally are a result of (1) extended
exploratory activities associated with offshore production and (2) the transitory effects of
deregulation in the Brazilian oil and gas industry, as described below. |
|
|
|
In 1998, the Companys government-granted monopoly ended and the Company signed concession
contracts with the Agência Nacional de Petróleo (National Petroleum Agency, or ANP) for all of
the areas the Company had been exploring and developing prior to 1998, which consisted of 397
concession blocks. Since 1998, the ANP has conducted competitive bidding rounds for
exploration rights, which has allowed the Company to acquire additional concession blocks.
After a concession block is found to contain a successful exploratory well, we must submit an
Evaluation Plan to the ANP for approval. This Evaluation Plan details the drilling plans for
additional exploratory wells. An Evaluation Plan is only submitted for those concession areas
where technical and economic feasibility analyses on existing exploration wells evidence
justification for completion of such wells. Until the ANP approves the Evaluation Plan, the
drilling of additional exploratory wells cannot commence. If companies do not find commercial
quantities of oil and gas within a specific time period, generally 4-6 years depending on the
characteristics of the exploration area, then the concession block must be relinquished and
returned to the ANP. Because the Company was required to assess a large volume of concession
blocks in a limited time frame even when an exploratory well has found sufficient reserves to
justify completion and additional wells are firmly planned, finite resources
|
F-129
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
25. |
|
Accounting for Suspended Exploratory Wells (Continued) |
|
|
|
and expiring time frames in other concession blocks have dictated the timing of the planned
additional drilling. |
|
|
|
The following table shows the net changes in capitalized exploratory drilling costs during the
years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unproved oil and gas properties (*) |
|
|
Year ended December,31 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Beginning balance at January 1 |
|
|
2,061 |
|
|
|
1,684 |
|
Additions to capitalized costs pending determination
of proved reserves |
|
|
2,186 |
|
|
|
1,247 |
|
Capitalized exploratory costs charged to expense |
|
|
(493 |
) |
|
|
(597 |
) |
Sales of reserves |
|
|
(199 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Transfers to property, plant and equipment based
on the determination of the proved reserves |
|
|
(1,614 |
) |
|
|
(423 |
) |
Cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance at December 31, |
|
|
2,054 |
|
|
|
2,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Amounts capitalized and subsequently expensed in the same period have been
excluded from the above table. |
The following table provides an aging of capitalized exploratory well costs based on the date
the drilling was completed and the number of projects for which exploratory well costs have
been capitalized for a period greater than one year since the completion of the drilling:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aging of capitalized exploratory well costs |
|
|
Year ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Capitalized exploratory well costs
that have been capitalized for a
period of one year or less |
|
|
1,733 |
|
|
|
1,155 |
|
Capitalized exploratory well costs
that have been capitalized for a
period greater than one year |
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
|
2,054 |
|
|
|
2,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of projects that have
exploratory well costs that have
been capitalized for a period
greater than one year |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-130
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
25. |
|
Accounting for Suspended Exploratory Wells (Continued) |
|
|
|
Of the US$321 for 50 projects that include wells suspended for more than one year since the
completion of drilling, approximately US$103 are related to wells in areas for which drilling
was under way or firmly planed for the near future and that we have submitted an Evaluation
Plan to the ANP for approval and approximately US$54 incurred in costs for activities
necessary to assess the reserves and their potential development. |
|
|
|
The US321 of suspended well cost capitalized for a period greater than one year as of December
31, 2006 represents 66 exploratory wells and the table below contains the aging of these costs
on a well basis: |
|
|
|
Aging based on drilling completion date of individual wells: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Million of |
|
Number of |
|
|
dollars |
|
wells |
2005 |
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
2004 |
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
2003 |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2001 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-131
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
|
(a) |
|
Global Notes |
|
|
|
|
On January 4, 2007, PIFCo, a wholly owned subsidiary of Petrobras, announced an offer for
the exchange of securities (Exchange Offering) totaling up US$500 (face value) for the
five series of notes. |
|
|
|
|
The objective of the Exchange was offer to the investors the opportunity to substitute the
five old notes listed below, with PIFCos new benchmark issued on October 06, 2006, with a
coupon of 6.125% per annum and maturity in 2016. |
|
|
|
|
The settlement of the Exchange Offering occurred on February 7, 2007 and as a result, PIFCo
received and accepted a tender amount of US$399 (face value of the Notes). All the notes
received were cancelled in the same day and as a consequence, PIFCo issued US$399 of Global
Notes due 2016 that bear interest at the rate of 6.125% per annun, payable semi-annually.
The new Notes constitute a single, fungible series with the US$500 Global Notes due 2016
and issued on October 06, 2006, amounting to US$899 in securities issued with maturity in
2016. PIFCo also paid to the investors a cash amount equivalent to US$56 as a result of the
Exchange. The table below presents the result of the Exchange. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ Million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal after |
|
|
Accepted for |
|
Old notes |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Settlement |
|
|
Exchange |
|
Global Step-Up Notes |
|
|
12.375 |
% |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Senior Notes |
|
|
9.875 |
% |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Senior Notes |
|
|
9.750 |
% |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Global Notes |
|
|
9.125 |
% |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
374 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
Global Notes |
|
|
7.750 |
% |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,359 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ Million |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal after |
|
|
Total |
|
New notes |
|
Interest rate |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Exchange |
|
|
Reopened |
|
Global Notes |
|
|
6.125 |
% |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
899 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-132
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
26. |
|
Subsequent Events (Continued) |
|
(b) |
|
Leasing of the Araucária Gas Thermoelectric Power Station |
|
|
|
|
Petrobras announced on January 3, 2007 that it had executed two service provision and
leasing contracts with UEG Araucária and COPEL. The first contract refers to the leasing
of the Araucária Gas Thermoelectric Power Station executed by Petrobras and UEG, in force
until December 31, 2007 which may be extended for a period of up to 12 months. The second
contract involves the provision of maintenance and operating services regarding the UEG
Araucária, executed by Petrobras and COPEL Geração, in force until December 31, 2008 or
the end of the leasing agreement, whichever occurs first. |
|
|
|
|
Under the two contracts, a fixed monthly payment will be due of US$8.89 per MWh multiplied
by the reference voltage (428,35 MW) plus a variable monthly payment of US$15.54 per MWh,
on the effective energy generated. These proceeds are used to cover all costs and taxes
incurred by UEG. |
|
|
|
|
Executing these contracts will enable better allocation of the gas produced to meet the
fundamental commitments referring to the energy sold by the Company. |
|
|
(c) |
|
Repactuation of PETROS Plan |
|
|
|
|
During 2006 Petrobras presented to employee participants and retirees a proposal to bring
equilibrium to the actual PETROS Plan. On February 28, 2007 the target for the minimum
accession number to the renegotiation set at 2/3 (two-thirds) of the members and was met
(see Note 16 (b)). |
|
|
|
|
The renegotiation process consists of changing the plans regulation, particularly the
articles related to how the benefits are readjusted, disentailing the readjustment of the
benefits paid to retirees and pensioners from wage increases granted to active employees
and INSS retirees. Petros Plan benefits, disentailed from the active employees wage and
INSS retirement and pension plan readjustments, will be adjusted based on the IPCA (cost
of living index). |
F-133
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
26. |
|
Subsequent Events (Continued) |
|
(c) |
|
Repactuation of PETROS Plan (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The financial incentive to be granted to the participants, whether employees or retirees,
as negotiated by the labor union representatives as a counterpart for the Plans
repactuation, amounted to US$425 and was paid on March 2007. |
|
|
|
|
The proposals approval also opens the way to reach agreements with Labor Union
Representations in order to liquidate and extinguish legal suits, particularly the Public
Civil Suit regarding Petrobras Systems complementary retirement issues. The demands that
refer to the items to be removed from the lawsuits will be attended to through the
calculation of their actuarial value and paid for by Petrobras, in 20 years, respecting
the Plans liquidity conditions. |
|
|
(d) |
|
Ipiranga Group Acquisition |
|
|
|
|
On March 19, 2007, Ultrapar Participações S.A. (Ultrapar) has celebrated, with the
acknowledgement of Petróleo Brasileiro S.A. (Petrobras) and Braskem S.A.(Braskem) a
contract with the controlling shareholders of Refinaria de Petróleo Ipiranga S.A,
Distribuidora de Produtos de Petróleo Ipiranga S.A. and Companhia Brasileira de Petróleo
Ipiranga for the acquisition of their total interest in those companies, including
petrochemical and distribution assets. |
|
|
|
|
After the completion of the acquisition, the businesses of the Ipiranga Group will be
managed by Ultrapar, Petrobras and Braskem. Ultrapar will hold 100% interest of the oil
products and lubricant distribution businesses located in the South and Southeast regions
of Brazil, Petrobras will hold 100% interest of the oil products and lubricant
distribution businesses located in the North, Northeast and Central West regions of
Brazil. Petrobras and Braskem will hold the petrochemical assets in the proportion of 40%
and 60% respectively. The assets related to refining operations will be equally shared
between Petrobras, Ultrapar and Braskem. |
F-134
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
26. |
|
Subsequent Events (Continued) |
|
(d) |
|
Ipiranga Group Acquisition (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
The conclusion of operation is estimated to occur during the fourth quarter of 2007. The
transaction will occur in some fases including acquisitions and incorporation of shares,
delisting of public companies in Brazilian Stock Exchange and segregation of the
distribution and petrochemical assets. |
|
|
|
|
The total value estimated for the operation is US$4.0 billion and Petrobras will pay
approximately US$1.3 billion for its interest. The transaction will be presented for
appreciation of the Brazilian Anti-trust Authorities (CADE Administrative Board for
Economic Defense), the Secretary for Economic Rights and the Secretary for Economic
Monitoring. |
F-135
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND
PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
In accordance with SFAS 69 Disclosures About Oil and Gas Producing Activities (SFAS 69),
this section provides supplemental information on oil and gas exploration and producing activities
of the Company. The information included in items (i) through (iii) provides historical cost
information pertaining to costs incurred in exploration, property acquisitions and development,
capitalized costs and results of operations. The information included in items (iv) and (v)
present information on Petrobras estimated net proved reserve quantities, standardized measure of
estimated discounted future net cash flows related to proved reserves, and changes in estimated
discounted future net cash flows.
Beginning in 1995, the Federal Government of Brazil undertook a comprehensive reform of the
countrys oil and gas regulatory system. On November 9, 1995, the Brazilian Constitution was
amended to authorize the Federal Government to contract with any state or privately-owned company
to carry out the activities related to the upstream and downstream segments of the Brazilian oil
and gas sector. This amendment eliminated Petrobras effective monopoly. The amendment was
implemented by the Petroleum Law, which liberated the fuel market in Brazil beginning January 1,
2002.
The Petroleum Law established a new regulatory framework ending Petrobras exclusive agency and
enabling competition in all aspects of the oil and gas industry in Brazil. As provided in the
Petroleum Law, Petrobras was granted the exclusive right for a period of 27 years to exploit the
petroleum reserves in all fields where the Company had previously commenced production. However,
the Petroleum Law established a procedural framework for
Petrobras to claim exclusive exploratory (and, in case of success, development) rights for a
period of up to three years with respect to areas where the Company could demonstrate that it had
established prospects. To perfect its claim to explore and develop these areas, the Company had
to demonstrate that it had the requisite financial capacity to carry out these activities, alone
or through financing or partnering arrangements.
The International geographic includes activities in Angola, Argentina, Bolivia, Colombia,
Ecuador, Mexico, Nigeria, Peru, the United States of America, Venezuela, Iran, Lybia and Tanzania.
The Company has immaterial non-consolidated companies involved in exploration and production
activities; the amounts related to such are in the line item titled Companys share of
unconsolidated affiliates.
F-136
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
(i) |
|
Capitalized costs relating to oil and gas producing activities |
|
|
|
The following table summarizes capitalized costs for oil and gas exploration and production
activities with the related accumulated depreciation, depletion and amortization, and asset
retirement obligation assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006 |
|
|
Brazil |
|
International |
|
Worldwide |
Unproved oil and gas properties |
|
|
683 |
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
2,054 |
|
Proved oil and gas properties |
|
|
23,967 |
|
|
|
4,240 |
|
|
|
28,207 |
|
Support equipment |
|
|
13,851 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
14,305 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross capitalized costs |
|
|
38,501 |
|
|
|
6,065 |
|
|
|
44,566 |
|
Depreciation and depletion |
|
|
(14,979 |
) |
|
|
(1,902 |
) |
|
|
(16,881 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,522 |
|
|
|
4,163 |
|
|
|
27,685 |
|
Construction and installations in progress |
|
|
10,457 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
10,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,979 |
|
|
|
4,436 |
|
|
|
38,415 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proportional interest of net capitalized
costs of equity companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net capitalized costs |
|
|
33,979 |
|
|
|
4,660 |
|
|
|
38,639 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005 |
|
|
Brazil |
|
International |
|
Worldwide |
Unproved oil and gas properties |
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
721 |
|
|
|
2,061 |
|
Proved oil and gas properties |
|
|
18,734 |
|
|
|
4,374 |
|
|
|
23,108 |
|
Support equipment |
|
|
10,755 |
|
|
|
1,034 |
|
|
|
11,789 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross capitalized costs |
|
|
30,829 |
|
|
|
6,129 |
|
|
|
36,958 |
|
Depreciation and depletion |
|
|
(14,378 |
) |
|
|
(2,463 |
) |
|
|
(16,841 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,451 |
|
|
|
3,666 |
|
|
|
20,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and installations in progress |
|
|
9,418 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
9,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net capitalized costs |
|
|
25,869 |
|
|
|
3,801 |
|
|
|
29,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-137
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND
PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
(ii) |
|
Costs incurred in oil and gas property acquisition, exploration and development
activities |
|
|
|
Costs incurred are summarized below and include both amounts expensed and capitalized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
Brazil |
|
International |
|
Worldwide |
Property acquisitions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proved |
|
|
|
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
Unproved |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
Exploration costs |
|
|
1,752 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
2,182 |
|
Development costs |
|
|
6,022 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
6,839 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,812 |
|
|
|
1,963 |
|
|
|
9,775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proportional interest of
costs incurred of equity
companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,812 |
|
|
|
1,987 |
|
|
|
9,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
Brazil |
|
International |
|
Worldwide |
Property acquisitions
Unproved |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
346 |
|
Exploration costs |
|
|
1,741 |
|
|
|
420 |
|
|
|
2,161 |
|
Development costs |
|
|
4,687 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
5,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,648 |
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
7,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004 |
|
|
Brazil |
|
International |
|
Worldwide |
Property acquisitions
Unproved |
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
173 |
|
Exploration costs |
|
|
1,003 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
1,253 |
|
Development costs |
|
|
3,591 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
3,995 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,750 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
5,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-138
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND
PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
(iii) |
|
Results of operations for oil and gas producing activities |
|
|
|
The Companys results of operations from oil and gas producing activities for the years ending
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004 are shown in the following table. The Company transfers
substantially all of its Brazilian crude oil and gas production to the supply segment in
Brazil. The prices calculated by the Companys model may not be indicative of the price the
Company would have realized had this production been sold in an unregulated spot market.
Additionally, the prices calculated by the Companys model may not be indicative of the future
prices to be realized by the Company after January 1, 2002, when full price deregulation began.
Gas prices used are contracted prices to third parties. |
|
|
|
Production costs are lifting costs incurred to operate and maintain productive wells and
related equipment and facilities, including such costs as operating labor, materials, supplies,
fuel consumed in operations and the costs of operating natural liquid gas plants. Production
costs also include administrative expenses and depreciation and amortization of equipment
associated with production activities. |
|
|
|
Exploration expenses include the costs of geological and geophysical activities and
non-productive exploratory wells. Depreciation and amortization expenses relate to assets
employed in exploration and development activities. In accordance with SFAS 69, income taxes
are based on statutory tax rates, reflecting allowable deductions. Interest income and expense
are excluded from the results reported in this table. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2006 |
|
|
Brazil |
|
International |
|
Worldwide |
Net operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to third parties |
|
|
3,351 |
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
4,035 |
|
Intersegment (1) |
|
|
31,171 |
|
|
|
1,830 |
|
|
|
33,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34,522 |
|
|
|
2,514 |
|
|
|
37,036 |
|
Production costs (2) |
|
|
(11,761 |
) |
|
|
(949 |
) |
|
|
(12,710 |
) |
Exploration expenses |
|
|
(501 |
) |
|
|
(434 |
) |
|
|
(935 |
) |
Depreciation, depletion, amortization |
|
|
(2,166 |
) |
|
|
(309 |
) |
|
|
(2,475 |
) |
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results before income taxes |
|
|
20,052 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
20,870 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(6,818 |
) |
|
|
(279 |
) |
|
|
(7,097 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,234 |
|
|
|
539 |
|
|
|
13,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proportional interest in results of producing
activities of equity companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of operations (excluding corporate overhead and
interest cost) |
|
|
13,234 |
|
|
|
559 |
|
|
|
13,793 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-139
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND
PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
(iii) |
|
Results of operations for oil and gas producing activities (Continued) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2005 |
|
|
Brazil |
|
International |
|
Worldwide |
Net operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to third parties |
|
|
1,874 |
|
|
|
920 |
|
|
|
2,794 |
|
Intersegment (1) |
|
|
25,997 |
|
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
27,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,871 |
|
|
|
2,396 |
|
|
|
30,267 |
|
Production costs (2) |
|
|
(10,342 |
) |
|
|
(665 |
) |
|
|
(11,007 |
) |
Exploration expenses |
|
|
(871 |
) |
|
|
(142 |
) |
|
|
(1,013 |
) |
Depreciation, depletion, amortization |
|
|
(1,571 |
) |
|
|
(360 |
) |
|
|
(1,931 |
) |
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(145 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results before income taxes |
|
|
15,047 |
|
|
|
1,095 |
|
|
|
16,142 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(5,116 |
) |
|
|
(372 |
) |
|
|
(5,488 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of operations (excluding corporate overhead and
interest cost) |
|
|
9,931 |
|
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
10,654 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2004 |
|
|
Brazil |
|
International |
|
Worldwide |
Net operating revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to third parties |
|
|
2,308 |
|
|
|
713 |
|
|
|
3,021 |
|
Intersegment (1) |
|
|
16,001 |
|
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
17,088 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,309 |
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
20,109 |
|
Production costs (2) |
|
|
(6,771 |
) |
|
|
(461 |
) |
|
|
(7,232 |
) |
Exploration expenses |
|
|
(418 |
) |
|
|
(195 |
) |
|
|
(613 |
) |
Depreciation, depletion, amortization |
|
|
(1,322 |
) |
|
|
(327 |
) |
|
|
(1,649 |
) |
Impairment of oil and gas properties |
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
Other operating expenses |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results before income taxes |
|
|
9,706 |
|
|
|
753 |
|
|
|
10,459 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(3,396 |
) |
|
|
(278 |
) |
|
|
(3,674 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results of operations (excluding corporate overhead and
interest cost) |
|
|
6,310 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
6,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Does not consider US$1,216 (US$953 for 2005) related to field processing activities,
for which Petrobras has no attributable quantity of reserve. The amount, which relates
principally to dry gas volumes, is considered in Petrobras net operating revenues of
US$35,738 (US$28,824 for 2005) for the segment of E&P Brazil (Note 23). |
|
(2) |
|
Does not consider US$1,873 (US$985 for 2005) related to field processing activities,
for which Petrobras has no attributable quantity of reserve. The amount, which relates
principally to dry gas volumes, is considered in Petrobras cost of sales of US$13,634
(US$11,327 for 2005) for the segment of E&P Brazil (Note 23). |
F-140
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND
PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
(iv) |
|
Reserve quantities information |
|
|
|
The Companys estimated net proved oil and gas reserves and changes thereto for the years 2006,
2005 and 2004 are shown in the following table. Proved reserves are estimated by the Companys
reservoir engineers in accordance with the reserve definitions prescribed by the Securities and
Exchange Commission. |
|
|
|
Proved oil and gas reserves are the estimated quantities of crude oil, natural gas and natural
gas liquids which geological and engineering data demonstrate with reasonable certainty to be
recoverable in future years from known reservoirs under existing economic and operating
conditions. Proved reserves do not include additional quantities recoverable beyond the term of
the concession or contract, or that may result from extensions of currently proved areas, or
from application of secondary or tertiary recovery processes not yet tested and determined to
be economic. |
|
|
|
Proved developed reserves are the quantities expected to be recovered from existing wells with
existing equipment and operating methods. Proved undeveloped reserves are those volumes which
are expected to be recovered as a result of future investments in drilling, re-equipping
existing wells and installing facilities necessary to deliver the production from these
reserves. |
|
|
|
In some cases, substantial new investments in additional wells and related facilities will be
required to recover these proved reserves. Due to the inherent uncertainties and the limited
nature of reservoir data, estimates of reserves are subject to change as additional information
becomes available. |
F-141
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND
PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
(iv) |
|
Reserve quantities information (Continued) |
|
|
|
A summary of the annual changes in the proved reserves of crude oil and natural gas follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oil (millions of barrels) |
|
Gas (billions of cubic feet) |
|
|
Brazil |
|
International |
|
Worldwide |
|
Brazil |
|
International |
|
Worldwide |
Worldwide net proved developed
and undeveloped reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves at December 31, 2003 |
|
|
9,051.4 |
|
|
|
720.7 |
(1) |
|
|
9,772.1 |
|
|
|
8,111.4 |
|
|
|
3,090.9 |
(1) |
|
|
11,202.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revisions of previous estimates |
|
|
(414.9 |
) |
|
|
(18.8 |
) |
|
|
(433.7 |
) |
|
|
(262.1 |
) |
|
|
276,4 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
Improved recovery |
|
|
50.2 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
63,4 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
26.8 |
|
|
|
40.0 |
|
Extensions and discoveries |
|
|
1,079.1 |
|
|
|
47.4 |
|
|
|
1,126.5 |
|
|
|
569.4 |
|
|
|
89.7 |
|
|
|
659.1 |
|
Purchase of reserves in place PEPSA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
Production for the year |
|
|
(522.4 |
) |
|
|
(61.1 |
) |
|
|
(583.5 |
) |
|
|
(477.6 |
) |
|
|
(209.5 |
) |
|
|
(687.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves at December 31, 2004 |
|
|
9,243.4 |
|
|
|
702.0 |
(1) |
|
|
9,945.4 |
|
|
|
7,954.3 |
|
|
|
3,292.8 |
(1) |
|
|
11,247.1 |
|
Revisions of previous estimates |
|
|
123.0 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
123.5 |
|
|
|
842.4 |
|
|
|
(32.6 |
) |
|
|
809.8 |
|
Improved recovery |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(9.4 |
) |
|
|
(8.3 |
) |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
Extensions and discoveries |
|
|
250.9 |
|
|
|
47.8 |
|
|
|
298.7 |
|
|
|
990.0 |
|
|
|
38.6 |
|
|
|
1,028.6 |
|
Production for the year |
|
|
(584.5 |
) |
|
|
(58.8 |
) |
|
|
(643.3 |
) |
|
|
(529.8 |
) |
|
|
(210.9 |
) |
|
|
(740.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
9,033.9 |
|
|
|
682.1 |
(1) |
|
|
9,716.0 |
|
|
|
9,263.8 |
|
|
|
3,088.1 |
(1) |
|
|
12,351.9 |
|
Interest loss in Venezuela |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(240.5 |
) |
|
|
(240.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(171.2 |
) |
|
|
(171.2 |
) |
Revisions of previous estimates |
|
|
463.4 |
|
|
|
(15.3 |
) |
|
|
448.1 |
|
|
|
322.1 |
|
|
|
(459.2 |
) |
|
|
(137.1 |
) |
Improved recovery |
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
7.6 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
Acquisition of reserves |
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
45.7 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
|
|
61.7 |
|
Sale of reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extensions and discoveries |
|
|
112.8 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
134.2 |
|
|
|
320.6 |
|
|
|
65.2 |
|
|
|
385.8 |
|
Production for the year |
|
|
(616.0 |
) |
|
|
(42.6 |
) |
|
|
(658.6 |
) |
|
|
(532.9 |
) |
|
|
(209.8 |
) |
|
|
(742.7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserves at December 31, 2006 |
|
|
9,001.9 |
|
|
|
416.2 |
(1) |
|
|
9,418.1 |
|
|
|
9,426.9 |
|
|
|
2,339.0 |
(1) |
|
|
11,765.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proportional interest in net
proved developed and undeveloped
reserves of equity companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65.7 |
|
|
|
65.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77.3 |
|
|
|
77.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proved Developed Reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 1, 2003 |
|
|
3,912.9 |
|
|
|
94.7 |
|
|
|
4,007.6 |
|
|
|
3,892.5 |
|
|
|
2,043.9 |
|
|
|
5,936.4 |
|
At December 31, 2003 |
|
|
3,629.5 |
|
|
|
404.1 |
|
|
|
4,033.6 |
|
|
|
4,398.1 |
|
|
|
2,548.4 |
|
|
|
6,946.5 |
|
At December 31, 2004 |
|
|
4,129.8 |
|
|
|
383.1 |
|
|
|
4,512.9 |
|
|
|
4,427.6 |
|
|
|
2,495.2 |
|
|
|
6,922.8 |
|
At December 31, 2005 |
|
|
4.071.7 |
|
|
|
365.9 |
|
|
|
4,437.6 |
|
|
|
4,088.8 |
|
|
|
2,333.7 |
|
|
|
6,422.5 |
|
At December 31, 2006 |
|
|
3,987.7 |
|
|
|
232.9 |
|
|
|
4,220.6 |
|
|
|
4,115.4 |
|
|
|
1,758.0 |
|
|
|
5,873.4 |
|
Proportional interest in proved
reserves of equity companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43.1 |
|
|
|
43.1 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes reserves of 134.0 million barrels of oil and 504.8 billions of cubic feet of
gas in 2006 (222.8 million barrels of oil and 550.6 billions of cubic feet of gas in 2005;
and 228.6 million barrels of oil and 445.6 billions of cubic feet of gas in 2004)
attributable to 41.38% minority interest in PEPSA, which is consolidated by Petrobras. |
F-142
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND
PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
(iv) |
|
Reserve quantities information (Continued) |
|
|
|
The decrease in reserves is related to revisions of previous estimates due to Bolivia
and Venezuela new nationalization measures during 2006. The new regulation in Venezuela
reduced our reserves as PDVSA became the main controller of the companies created to
operate the fields with private companies. In Bolivia, due to new government regulations,
occurred a decrease in the reserves. In Nigeria, the consortium in charge of Akpo field was
constituted by Total, Petrobras and a Nigerian private company called SAPETRO. The
agreement underwritten by these companies established that TOTAL and Petrobras carried the
investment cost of the third part and it would be compensated in the future with SAPETROs
production/reserves. |
|
|
|
Along 2006, SAPETRO sold its participation to a Chinese oil company and, as part of this
agreement, Petrobras and TOTAL were reimbursed for their past carrying investments |
|
(v) |
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas
quantities and changes therein |
|
|
|
The standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, related to the above proved oil
and gas reserves, is calculated in accordance with the requirements of SFAS 69. Estimated
future cash inflows from production in Brazil are computed by applying year-end prices based
upon the Companys internal pricing methodology for oil and gas to year-end quantities of
estimated net proved reserves. Estimated future cash inflows from production related to the
Companys International segment are computed by applying year-end prices for oil and gas to
year-end quantities of estimated net proved reserves. Future price changes are limited to those
provided by contractual arrangements in existence at the end of each reporting year. Future
development and production costs are those estimated future expenditures necessary to develop
and produce year-end estimated proved reserves based on year-end cost indicators, assuming
continuation of year-end economic conditions. Estimated future income taxes are calculated by
applying appropriate year-end statutory tax rates. These rates reflect allowable deductions and
are applied to estimated future pre-tax net cash flows, less the tax basis of related assets.
Discounted future net cash flows are calculated using 10% midperiod discount factors. This
discounting requires a year-by-year estimate of when the future expenditures will be incurred
and when the reserves will be produced. |
|
|
|
The information provided does not represent managements estimate of Petrobras expected future
cash flows or value of proved oil and gas reserves. Estimates of proved reserve quantities
involves uncertainty and change over time as new information becomes available. Moreover,
probable and possible reserves, which may become proved in the future, are excluded from the
calculations. |
F-143
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND
PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
(v) |
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas
quantities and changes therein (Continued) |
|
|
|
The arbitrary valuation prescribed under SFAS 69 requires assumptions as to the timing and
amount of future development and production costs. The calculations are made as of December 31
each year and should not be relied upon as an indication of Petrobras future cash flows or the
value of its oil and gas reserves. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
International |
|
Worldwide |
At December 31, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future cash inflows |
|
|
477,051 |
|
|
|
24,691 |
|
|
|
501,742 |
|
Future production costs |
|
|
(175,483 |
) |
|
|
(5,726 |
) |
|
|
(181,209 |
) |
Future development costs |
|
|
(30,185 |
) |
|
|
(2,679 |
) |
|
|
(32,864 |
) |
Future income tax expenses |
|
|
(93,914 |
) |
|
|
(7,051 |
) |
|
|
(100,965 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undiscounted future net cash flows |
|
|
177,469 |
|
|
|
9,235 |
|
|
|
186,704 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 percent midyear annual discount for
timing of estimated cash flows |
|
|
(83,582 |
) |
|
|
(3,566 |
) |
|
|
(87,148 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows |
|
|
93,887 |
|
|
|
5,669 |
|
|
|
99,556 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proportional interest in standardized measure of
discounted future net cash flows related to proved
reserves of equity companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future cash inflows |
|
|
496,355 |
|
|
|
36,014 |
|
|
|
532,369 |
|
Future production costs |
|
|
(170,638 |
) |
|
|
(7,339 |
) |
|
|
(177,977 |
) |
Future development costs |
|
|
(25,934 |
) |
|
|
(2,946 |
) |
|
|
(28,880 |
) |
Future income tax expenses |
|
|
(103,726 |
) |
|
|
(10,929 |
) |
|
|
(114,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undiscounted future net cash flows |
|
|
196,057 |
|
|
|
14,800 |
|
|
|
210,857 |
|
10 percent midyear annual discount for
timing of estimated cash flows |
|
|
(95,580 |
) |
|
|
(5,962 |
) |
|
|
(101,542 |
) |
Companys share by unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows |
|
|
100,477 |
|
|
|
8,899 |
* |
|
|
109,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future cash inflows |
|
|
366,045 |
|
|
|
24,222 |
|
|
|
390,267 |
|
Future production costs |
|
|
(131,090 |
) |
|
|
(4,003 |
) |
|
|
(135,093 |
) |
Future development costs |
|
|
(19,315 |
) |
|
|
(2,224 |
) |
|
|
(21,539 |
) |
Future income tax expenses |
|
|
(74,758 |
) |
|
|
(5,889 |
) |
|
|
(80,647 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Undiscounted future net cash flows |
|
|
140,882 |
|
|
|
12,106 |
|
|
|
152,988 |
|
10 percent midyear annual discount for
timing of estimated cash flows |
|
|
(69,397 |
) |
|
|
(5,423 |
) |
|
|
(74,820 |
) |
Companys share by unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows |
|
|
71,485 |
|
|
|
6,804 |
* |
|
|
78,289 |
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
Includes US$1,338 in 2006 (US$2,379 in 2005 and U.S.$1,774 in 2004) attributable to
41.38% minority interest in PEPSA, which is consolidated by Petrobras. |
F-144
PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS
AND SUBSIDIARIES
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION ON OIL AND GAS EXPLORATION AND
PRODUCTION ACTIVITIES (UNAUDITED)
Expressed in Millions of United States Dollars
(except when specifically indicated)
(v) |
|
Standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows relating to proved oil and gas
quantities and changes therein (Continued) |
|
|
|
The following are the principal sources of change in the standardized measure of discounted net
cash flows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brazil |
|
|
International |
|
|
Worldwide |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
|
100,477 |
|
|
|
71,485 |
|
|
|
35,522 |
|
|
|
8,899 |
|
|
|
6,804 |
|
|
|
5,297 |
|
|
|
109,376 |
|
|
|
78,289 |
|
|
|
40,819 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales and transfers of oil and gas, net of
production costs |
|
|
(22,761 |
) |
|
|
(17,529 |
) |
|
|
(11,538 |
) |
|
|
(1,505 |
) |
|
|
(1,731 |
) |
|
|
(1,339 |
) |
|
|
(24,266 |
) |
|
|
(19,260 |
) |
|
|
(12,877 |
) |
Development costs incurred |
|
|
6,022 |
|
|
|
4,686 |
|
|
|
3,591 |
|
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
647 |
|
|
|
404 |
|
|
|
6,839 |
|
|
|
5,333 |
|
|
|
3,995 |
|
Purchases of reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73 |
|
Sales of reserves |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Extensions, discoveries and improved less
related costs |
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
|
6,599 |
|
|
|
12,881 |
|
|
|
494 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
3,003 |
|
|
|
7,153 |
|
|
|
13,896 |
|
Interest loss in Venezuela |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,305 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revisions of previous quantity estimates |
|
|
10,373 |
|
|
|
4,156 |
|
|
|
(4,892 |
) |
|
|
(1,825 |
) |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
8,548 |
|
|
|
4,248 |
|
|
|
(4,950 |
) |
Net changes in prices and production costs |
|
|
(12,698 |
) |
|
|
48,525 |
|
|
|
51,115 |
|
|
|
(976 |
) |
|
|
4,981 |
|
|
|
2,042 |
|
|
|
(13,674 |
) |
|
|
53,506 |
|
|
|
53,157 |
|
Changes in future development costs |
|
|
(5,274 |
) |
|
|
(9,405 |
) |
|
|
(292 |
) |
|
|
(749 |
) |
|
|
(658 |
) |
|
|
(504 |
) |
|
|
(6,023 |
) |
|
|
(10,063 |
) |
|
|
(796 |
) |
Accretion of discount |
|
|
10,048 |
|
|
|
7,148 |
|
|
|
3,552 |
|
|
|
1,006 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
739 |
|
|
|
11,054 |
|
|
|
8,142 |
|
|
|
4,291 |
|
Net change in income taxes |
|
|
5,191 |
|
|
|
(15,188 |
) |
|
|
(18,454 |
) |
|
|
817 |
|
|
|
(2,784 |
) |
|
|
(865 |
) |
|
|
6,008 |
|
|
|
(17,972 |
) |
|
|
(19,319 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31 |
|
|
93,887 |
|
|
|
100,477 |
|
|
|
71,485 |
|
|
|
5,669 |
|
|
|
8,899 |
|
|
|
6,804 |
|
|
|
99,556 |
|
|
|
109,376 |
|
|
|
78,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proportional interest in standardized
measure of discounted future net cash
flows related to proved reserves of
equity companies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-145
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL
FINANCE COMPANY (A wholly-owned
subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO
S.A. PETROBRAS)
Consolidated financial statements
Years ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
together with Report of Independent Registered
Public Accounting Firm
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
Contents
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-146 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Audited Financial Statements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-148 |
|
|
|
|
F-150 |
|
|
|
|
F-151 |
|
|
|
|
F-152 |
|
|
|
|
F-154 |
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Executive Board and Stockholder of
Petrobras International Finance Company
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Petrobras International Finance
Company (and subsidiaries) as of December 31, 2006, and the related consolidated statements of
operations, stockholders deficit, and cash flows for the year then ended. We also have audited
managements assessment, included in the accompanying Managements Report on the Internal Control
over Financial Reporting, that Petrobras International Finance Company (and subsidiaries)
maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on
criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Petrobras International Finance Companys
management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated
financial statements, an opinion on managements assessment, and an opinion on the effectiveness of
the Companys internal control over financial reporting based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit of financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining
an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating managements assessment,
testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
F-146
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable
assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1)
pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the
transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company;
and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or
detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are
subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all
material respects, the financial position of Petrobras International Finance Company as of December
31, 2006, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year then ended, in
conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, managements
assessment that Petrobras International Finance Company maintained effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, is fairly stated, in all material respects, based on
criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Furthermore, in our opinion, Petrobras
International Finance Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2006, based on criteria established in Internal
Contro-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO).
April 2, 2007
KPMG Auditores Independentes
F-147
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005
(In thousands of US dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
510,812 |
|
|
|
230,745 |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
645,278 |
|
|
|
82,923 |
|
Trade accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties |
|
|
10,658,905 |
|
|
|
8,681,075 |
|
Other |
|
|
835,437 |
|
|
|
212,703 |
|
Notes receivable related parties |
|
|
6,114,651 |
|
|
|
3,329,336 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
262,720 |
|
|
|
195,935 |
|
Export prepayments related parties |
|
|
67,785 |
|
|
|
414,505 |
|
Restricted deposits for guarantees and other |
|
|
145,732 |
|
|
|
94,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,241,320 |
|
|
|
13,241,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
1,151,588 |
|
|
|
2,165,718 |
|
Notes receivable related parties |
|
|
239,709 |
|
|
|
579,960 |
|
Export prepayment related parties |
|
|
464,380 |
|
|
|
529,420 |
|
Restricted deposits for guarantees and prepaid expenses |
|
|
223,618 |
|
|
|
231,544 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,079,295 |
|
|
|
3,506,642 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
21,321,315 |
|
|
|
16,748,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the financial statements.
F-148
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
As of December 31, 2006 and 2005
(In thousands of US dollars, except for number of shares and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Liabilities and stockholders (deficit)/equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties |
|
|
1,142,848 |
|
|
|
950,732 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,121,986 |
|
|
|
616,076 |
|
Notes payable related parties |
|
|
5,386,759 |
|
|
|
4,346,139 |
|
Short-term financing |
|
|
148,447 |
|
|
|
339,503 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
1,057,438 |
|
|
|
551,628 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
97,865 |
|
|
|
107,710 |
|
Unearned income related parties |
|
|
248,688 |
|
|
|
176,481 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
60,199 |
|
|
|
10,169 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,264,230 |
|
|
|
7,098,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
4,640,134 |
|
|
|
5,908,416 |
|
Notes payable related parties |
|
|
7,441,701 |
|
|
|
3,734,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,081,835 |
|
|
|
9,642,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders (deficit)/equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares authorized and issued |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock 2006 300,050,000 shares and
2005 - 50,000 shares par value US$1 |
|
|
300,050 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
53,926 |
|
|
|
173,926 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(376,519 |
) |
|
|
(165,994 |
) |
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on cash flow hedge |
|
|
(2,207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24,750 |
) |
|
|
7,982 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders (deficit)/equity |
|
|
21,321,315 |
|
|
|
16,748,948 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the financial statements.
F-149
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
(In thousands of US dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Sales of crude oil, oil products and services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties |
|
|
14,236,511 |
|
|
|
13,974,381 |
|
|
|
10,118,356 |
|
Other |
|
|
7,833,263 |
|
|
|
3,161,764 |
|
|
|
2,237,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,069,774 |
|
|
|
17,136,145 |
|
|
|
12,355,572 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties |
|
|
(8,121,994 |
) |
|
|
(7,780,293 |
) |
|
|
(4,391,285 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(13,778,560 |
) |
|
|
(9,203,008 |
) |
|
|
(7,844,699 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties |
|
|
(189,667 |
) |
|
|
(158,075 |
) |
|
|
(98,700 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(17,678 |
) |
|
|
(7,647 |
) |
|
|
(1,129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,107,899 |
) |
|
|
(17,149,023 |
) |
|
|
(12,335,813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
(38,125 |
) |
|
|
(12,878 |
) |
|
|
19,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties |
|
|
999,204 |
|
|
|
765,507 |
|
|
|
568,566 |
|
Other |
|
|
285,994 |
|
|
|
218,479 |
|
|
|
110,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,285,198 |
|
|
|
983,986 |
|
|
|
678,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties |
|
|
(722,434 |
) |
|
|
(409,822 |
) |
|
|
(169,039 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(735,332 |
) |
|
|
(589,088 |
) |
|
|
(592,207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,457,766 |
) |
|
|
(998,910 |
) |
|
|
(761,246 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(525 |
) |
Other |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
4,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
3,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss for the year |
|
|
(210,525 |
) |
|
|
(27,756 |
) |
|
|
(59,103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the financial statements.
F-150
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS (DEFICIT)/EQUITY
Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
(In thousands of US dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Capital increase |
|
|
300,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
300,050 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
|
173,926 |
|
|
|
173,926 |
|
|
|
173,926 |
|
Transfer to capital |
|
|
(120,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
53,926 |
|
|
|
173,926 |
|
|
|
173,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
|
(165,994 |
) |
|
|
(138,238 |
) |
|
|
(79,135 |
) |
Loss for the year |
|
|
(210,525 |
) |
|
|
(27,756 |
) |
|
|
(59,103 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
(376,519 |
) |
|
|
(165,994 |
) |
|
|
(138,238 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on cash flow hedge |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in the year |
|
|
(2,207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year |
|
|
(2,207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders (deficit)/equity |
|
|
(24,750 |
) |
|
|
7,982 |
|
|
|
35,738 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the financial statements.
F-151
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
(In thousands of US dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2004 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss for the year |
|
|
(210,525 |
) |
|
|
(27,756 |
) |
|
|
(59,103 |
) |
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to net cash
used in operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization of prepaid expenses and debt amortization |
|
|
20,725 |
|
|
|
10,150 |
|
|
|
5,198 |
|
Decrease (increase) in assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties |
|
|
(1,977,830 |
) |
|
|
(893,006 |
) |
|
|
(2,723,597 |
) |
Other |
|
|
(622,734 |
) |
|
|
(59,079 |
) |
|
|
(44,209 |
) |
Export prepayments related parties |
|
|
411,760 |
|
|
|
470,754 |
|
|
|
64,652 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
(242,283 |
) |
|
|
(221,863 |
) |
|
|
(232,637 |
) |
Increase (decrease) in liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related parties |
|
|
192,116 |
|
|
|
388,593 |
|
|
|
291,189 |
|
Other |
|
|
505,910 |
|
|
|
48,999 |
|
|
|
218,048 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(44,551 |
) |
|
|
277,318 |
|
|
|
158,501 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities |
|
|
(1,967,412 |
) |
|
|
(5,890 |
) |
|
|
(2,321,958 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities, net |
|
|
451,775 |
|
|
|
(383,826 |
) |
|
|
(1,248,984 |
) |
Issuance of notes receivable related parties |
|
|
(8,858,270 |
) |
|
|
(5,114,060 |
) |
|
|
(2,042,177 |
) |
Collection of principal on notes receivable related parties |
|
|
6,515,911 |
|
|
|
3,226,935 |
|
|
|
1,885,407 |
|
Property and equipment |
|
|
(460 |
) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(488 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(1,891,044 |
) |
|
|
(2,270,970 |
) |
|
|
(1,406,242 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term financing, net issuance and repayments |
|
|
(191,056 |
) |
|
|
(116,654 |
) |
|
|
(396,233 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt |
|
|
982,280 |
|
|
|
695,000 |
|
|
|
1,106,887 |
|
Principal payments of long-term debt |
|
|
(1,731,726 |
) |
|
|
(602,410 |
) |
|
|
(465,208 |
) |
Proceeds from short-term loans related parties |
|
|
15,695,993 |
|
|
|
8,757,712 |
|
|
|
6,618,032 |
|
Principal payments of short-term loans related parties |
|
|
(17,964,891 |
) |
|
|
(7,333,327 |
) |
|
|
(6,245,614 |
) |
Proceeds from long-term loans related parties |
|
|
7,347,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,553,452 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
4,138,523 |
|
|
|
1,400,321 |
|
|
|
4,171,316 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
280,067 |
|
|
|
(876,539 |
) |
|
|
443,116 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
|
|
230,745 |
|
|
|
1,107,284 |
|
|
|
664,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year |
|
|
510,812 |
|
|
|
230,745 |
|
|
|
1,107,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See the accompanying notes to the financial statements.
F-152
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, 2006, 2005 and 2004
(In thousands of US dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years ended December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2004 |
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the year for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
1,371,169 |
|
|
|
727,739 |
|
|
|
583,769 |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase of capital through conversion of loan payable |
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of Senior Exchangeable Notes issued in
exchange for PETROBRAS loans (Note 8) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,476 |
|
See the accompanying notes to the financial statements.
F-153
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(In thousands of US dollars)
1. |
|
The Company and its Operations |
|
|
|
Petrobras International Finance Company PIFCo was incorporated in the Cayman Islands on
September 24, 1997 and operates as a wholly-owned subsidiary of PETROBRAS. |
|
|
|
The primary objective of Petrobras International Finance Company and its subsidiaries
(collectively, PIFCo or the Company) is to purchase crude oil and oil products from third
parties and sell them at a premium to PETROBRAS on a deferred payment basis. Accordingly,
intercompany activities and transactions, and therefore the Companys financial position and
results of operations, are affected by decisions made by PETROBRAS. Additionally, to a more
limited extent, the Company sells oil and oil products to third parties. PIFCo also engages in
international capital market borrowings as a part of the PETROBRAS financial and operating
strategy. |
|
|
|
The following is a brief description of each of the Companys wholly-owned subsidiaries: |
|
|
|
PETROBRAS FINANCE LIMITED |
|
|
|
PETROBRAS FINANCE LIMITED (PFL), based in the Cayman Islands, in connection with the Companys
structured finance export prepayment program, whereby PFL purchases fuel oil from PETROBRAS and
sells this product in the international market, including sales to designated customers, in
order to generate receivables to cover the sale of future receivables debt. Until June 1, 2006,
PFL also purchased bunker fuel from PETROBRAS. Certain sales were through subsidiaries of
PETROBRAS. |
|
|
|
PETROBRAS EUROPE LIMITED |
|
|
|
PETROBRAS EUROPE LIMITED (PEL), based in the United Kingdom, consolidates PETROBRAS European
trade and finance activities. These activities consist of advising on and negotiating the terms
and conditions for crude oil and oil products supplied to PIFCo and PETROBRAS, as well as
marketing Brazilian crude oil and other derivative products exported to the geographic areas in
which the Company operates. PEL plays an advisory role in connection with these activities and
undertakes no commercial or financial risk. |
F-154
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In thousands of US dollars)
1. |
|
The Company and its Operations (Continued) |
|
|
|
BEAR INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED |
|
|
|
BEAR INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED (BEAR), based in Bermuda, contracts insurance for PETROBRAS and
its subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
PETROBRAS SINGAPORE PRIVATE LIMITED (PSPL) |
|
|
|
In April 2006, PIFCo incorporated a new wholly-owned subsidiary: PETROBRAS SINGAPORE PRIVATE
LIMITED (PSPL), a company incorporated in Singapore to trade crude oil and oil products in
connection with the trading activities in Asia. This company initiated its operations in July,
2006. |
|
2. |
|
Basis of Financial Statement Presentation |
|
|
|
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP). The preparation of
these financial statements requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the
assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses reported in the financial statements, as well as
amounts included in the notes thereto. |
|
(a) |
|
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
|
|
The Companys functional currency is the US dollar. All monetary assets and liabilities
denominated in a currency other than the US dollar are remeasured into the US dollar using
the current exchange rates. The effect of variations in the foreign currencies is recorded
in the statement of operations as financial expense or income. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents consist of highly liquid investments that are readily convertible into
cash and have an original maturity of three months or less at their date of acquisition. |
F-155
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In thousands of US dollars)
2. |
|
Basis of Financial Statement Presentation (Continued) |
|
(c) |
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities are accounted for under SFAS No. 115 Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities (SFAS 115) and have been classified by the
Company as available for sale or trading based upon intended strategies with respect to
such securities. The marketable securities classified as trading are short-term in nature
as the investments are expected to be liquidated, sold, or used for current cash
requirements. The marketable securities classified as available for sale are long-term in
nature as the investments are not expected to be sold or otherwise liquidated in the next
twelve months. |
|
|
|
|
Trading securities are marked to market through current period earnings, available for
sale securities are marked to market through other comprehensive income, and held to
maturity securities are recorded at historical cost. There are no transfers between
categories of investments. |
|
|
(d) |
|
Inventories |
|
|
|
|
Inventories are stated at the lower of weighted average cost or market value. |
|
|
(e) |
|
Restricted Deposit and Guarantees |
|
|
|
|
Restricted Deposit and guarantees represent amounts placed in escrow as required by
contractual commitments of the Company. Deposits are made in cash and recorded at funded
amount. |
|
|
(f) |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses are exclusively comprised of deferred financing costs associated with the
Companys debt issuance and are being amortized over the terms of the related debt. The
unamortized balance of deferred financing costs was US$ 55,192 and US$ 66,025 as of
December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. |
|
|
(g) |
|
Current and long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
These are stated at known or estimated amounts including, when applicable, accrued
interest. |
F-156
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In thousands of US dollars)
2. |
|
Basis of Financial Statement Presentation (Continued) |
|
(h) |
|
Unearned income |
|
|
|
|
Unearned income represents the unearned premium charged by the Company to PETROBRAS and
ALBERTO PASQUALINI REFAP S.A. (REFAP) to compensate for its financing costs. The premium
is billed to PETROBRAS and REFAP at the same time the related product is sold, and is
deferred and recognized into earnings as a component of financial income on a
straight-line basis over the collection period, which ranges from 120 to 330 days, in
order to match the premium billed with the Companys financial expense. |
|
|
(i) |
|
Revenues, costs, income and expenses |
|
|
|
|
For all third party and related party transactions, revenues are recognized in accordance
with the U.S. SECs Staff Accounting Bulletion 104 Revenue Recognition. Crude oil and
oil products revenues are recognized on an accrual basis when persuasive evidence of an
arrangement exists in the form of a valid contract, delivery has occurred or title has
transferred, the price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured.
Costs are recognized when incurred. Income and expenses include financial interest and
charges, at official rates or indexes, relating to current and non-current assets and
liabilities and, when applicable, the effects arising from the adjustment of assets to
market or realizable value. |
|
|
|
|
The principle commercial transactions of the Company consist of: |
|
|
|
|
Imports the company buys from suppliers outside Brazil (mainly from third-parties) and
sells to PETROBRAS and its Brazilian subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
|
Exports the Company buys from PETROBRAS and sells to customers outside Brazil. |
|
|
|
|
Off-shore the Company buys and sells mainly outside of Brazil, in transactions with
third-parties and related parties. |
F-157
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In thousands of US dollars)
|
2. |
|
Basis of Financial Statement Presentation (Continued) |
|
(j) |
|
Financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
All of the Companys derivative instruments are recorded in the consolidated balance sheet
at their fair value. For exchange-traded contracts, fair value is based on quoted market
prices. For non-exchange traded contracts, fair value is based on dealer quotes, pricing
models or quoted prices for instruments with similar characteristics. The transaction
price is used as the initial fair value of the contracts. |
|
|
|
|
PIFCo designates at inception whether the derivative contact will be considered hedging or
non-hedging for SFAS 133 accounting purposes. Non-hedging derivatives that are considered
economic hedges, but not designated in a hedging relationship for accounting purposes, are
recorded as other current assets or liabilities, with changes in fair value recorded as
financial income or financial expense. |
|
|
|
|
For SFAS 133 hedges, PIFCo formally documents at inception all relationships; identifying
the hedging instrument and hedged item, as well as its risk management objectives and
strategies for undertaking the hedge. The Company assesses at the hedges inception and
for each reporting date thereafter whether the derivative used in the hedging transaction
is expected to be and has been highly effective. |
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2006, PIFCo has designated one hedging relationship for accounting
purposes as a cash flow hedge in order to manage foreign currency exchange rate risk.
Changes in the fair value of the derivative hedging instrument are recorded in Accumulated
OCI. Any hedge ineffectiveness, as well as the excluded component of the derivative from
the effectiveness assessments, are recorded directly in earnings (note 8(iv)). |
|
|
|
|
PIFCo had written put options in the past that allows the holder of the options to sell a
floating number of heavy fuel oil volumes at a minimum price of US$14/barrel. Such option
had served as an economic hedge on related future sales of receivables under the
structured finance export prepayment program; the intent of which was to ensure that
physical barrels delivered under the project finance agreement generate sufficient cash
proceeds to repay related financial obligations. Given the low strike price relative to
the market the fair value of these options is immaterial at December 31, 2006. |
F-158
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In thousands of US dollars)
2. |
|
Basis of Financial Statement Presentation (Continued) |
|
(k) |
|
Income taxes |
|
|
|
|
The Company accounts for income taxes using an asset and liability approach, which
requires the recognition of taxes payable or refundable for the current year and deferred
tax liabilities and assets representing the future tax consequences of events that have
been recognized in the Companys financial statements or tax return. The measurement of
current and deferred tax liabilities and assets is based on the provisions of the tax laws
in the countries in which the Company and its subsidiaries operate (the United Kingdom,
Bermuda, Singapore and the Cayman Islands in 2006 and the United Kingdom, Bermuda and the
Cayman Islands in 2005 and 2004). Deferred tax assets are reduced by the amount of any tax
benefits when, based on the available evidence, such benefit may not be realized. The
Cayman Islands and Bermuda have no corporate tax requirements, therefore the Company has
no tax provision from these locations and no significant operations in the United Kingdom
or Singapore. |
3. |
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Cash and banks |
|
|
461 |
|
|
|
6,242 |
|
Time deposits and short-term investment |
|
|
510,351 |
|
|
|
224,503 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
510,812 |
|
|
|
230,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-159
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In thousands of US dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
Total |
|
|
Security |
|
Maturity |
|
rate |
|
2006(*) |
|
2005(*) |
Available for Sale (***) |
|
CLEP (**) |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
975,840 |
|
|
|
1,888,498 |
|
Available for Sale (***) |
|
MARLIM (**) |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
12.25 |
% |
|
|
295,588 |
|
|
|
277,220 |
|
Available for Sale (***) |
|
GASENE (**) |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
5.67 |
% |
|
|
212,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
Held to Maturity |
|
PDET (**) |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
5.74 |
% |
|
|
207,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
Held to Maturity |
|
MEXILHÃO (**) |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
% |
|
|
87,589 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trading |
|
Various third parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,944 |
|
|
|
57,734 |
|
Available for Sale (***) |
|
Various third parties |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,189 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,796,866 |
|
|
|
2,248,641 |
|
Less: Current balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(645,278 |
) |
|
|
(82,923 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,151,588 |
|
|
|
2,165,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(*) |
|
The balances include interest and principal. |
|
(**) |
|
Securities held by the fund respective to the consolidated special purposes
companies, established to support PETROBRAS infrastructure projects, are not US exchange
traded securities. |
|
(***) |
|
Changes in fair value related to the securities classified as available for sale in
accordance with FAS 115 are diminimus and were included in the Statement of Operations as
financial income or expense. |
|
|
Marketable securities are comprised of amounts the Company has invested in the exclusive
portfolio of an investment fund, operated exclusively for PIFCo, which holds certain PIFCo and
PETROBRAS group securities among its other investments which are classified as held to
maturity, trading or available for sale under SFAS 115 based on managements intent. The
trading securities are presented as current assets, as they are expected to be used in the near
term for cash funding requirements; available for sale securities are presented as other
long-term assets, as they are not expected to be sold or liquidated in the next twelve months. |
|
|
|
At December 31, 2005, PIFCo had amounts invested in an exclusive portfolio of an investment
fund that held its own debt securities in the total amount of US$ 215,638. This amount was
recognized as an extinguishment of debt and offset against the balance of financing classified
under current and non-current liabilities. There were no repurchased securities of PIFCo debt
at December 31, 2006. |
F-160
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In thousands of US dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PETROBRAS |
|
DOWNSTREAM |
|
BRASPETRO |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PETRÓLEO |
|
INTERNATIONAL |
|
PARTICIPAÇÕES |
|
OIL SERVICES - |
|
|
|
|
|
PETROBRAS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BRASILEIRO |
|
BRASPETRO B.V. - |
|
S.A. |
|
BRASOIL |
|
|
|
|
|
NETHERLANDS B.V. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S.A. - |
|
PIB.B.V. and its |
|
and its |
|
and its |
|
|
|
|
|
and its |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PETROBRAS |
|
subsidiaries |
|
subsidiaries |
|
subsidiaries |
|
CLEP |
|
subsidiaries |
|
TERMOBAHIA (iv) |
|
MARLIM |
|
Other |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
507,495 |
|
|
|
627,335 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, principally for sales (i) |
|
|
10,246,875 |
|
|
|
160,033 |
|
|
|
251,997 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,658,905 |
|
|
|
8,681,075 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,721,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,360,912 |
|
|
|
560 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,114,651 |
|
|
|
3,329,336 |
|
|
|
|
|
Export prepayment |
|
|
67,785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,785 |
|
|
|
414,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
856,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
295,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,151,588 |
|
|
|
2,165,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
198,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,774 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
239,709 |
|
|
|
579,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
Export prepayment |
|
|
464,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
464,380 |
|
|
|
529,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts payable |
|
|
969,299 |
|
|
|
156,498 |
|
|
|
17,051 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,142,848 |
|
|
|
950,732 |
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable |
|
|
5,386,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,386,759 |
|
|
|
4,346,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unearned income |
|
|
247,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,528 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
248,688 |
|
|
|
176,481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes payable (ii) |
|
|
7,441,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,441,701 |
|
|
|
3,734,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of crude oil and oil products and
services |
|
|
9,729,919 |
|
|
|
3,022,525 |
|
|
|
1,484,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,236,511 |
|
|
|
13,974,381 |
|
|
|
10,118,356 |
|
Purchases (iii) |
|
|
(6,044,308 |
) |
|
|
(1,871,579 |
) |
|
|
(206,107 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,121,994 |
) |
|
|
(7,780,293 |
) |
|
|
(4,391,285 |
) |
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
(176,368 |
) |
|
|
(13,299 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(189,667 |
) |
|
|
(158,075 |
) |
|
|
(98,700 |
) |
Financial income |
|
|
623,767 |
|
|
|
162,470 |
|
|
|
28,268 |
|
|
|
2,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,454 |
|
|
|
3,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,912 |
|
|
|
999,204 |
|
|
|
765,507 |
|
|
|
568,566 |
|
Financial expense |
|
|
(722,434 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(722,434 |
) |
|
|
(409,822 |
) |
|
|
(169,039 |
) |
Other expense, net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(525 |
) |
|
|
Commercial operations between PIFCo and its subsidiaries and affiliated companies are carried out
under normal market conditions and at commercial prices, except for the sales of oil and oil
products to PETROBRAS, which have an extended settlement period consistent with PIFCos formation
as a financing entity, and include finance charges accrued during the extended payment period. |
|
|
|
Certain affiliates of PIFCo and PFL, which are subsidiaries of Petrobras, serve as agents in
connection with export sales to certain customers under the export prepayment program. Those
transactions have been classified as related party transactions for purposes of these financial
statements. |
|
|
|
The transactions were realized to support the financial and operational strategy of the Companys
Parent Company, PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS. |
|
(i) |
|
Accounts receivable from related parties relate principally to crude oil sales made by the
Company to PETROBRAS, with extended payment terms of up to 330 days. Extended payment terms for
accounts receivable from related parties were up to 270 days in 2004. |
|
|
(ii) |
|
Long-Term Liabilities Notes payable relate to loans executed between the Company and
PETROBRAS due in 2021, with annual interest rates ranging from 8.3% to 8.6%. |
|
|
(iii) |
|
Purchases from related parties are presented in the cost of sales section of the
statement of operations. |
|
|
(iv) |
|
On December 28, 2005, in order to lend support to Petrobras in its transactions related
to the Termobahia power plant, PIFCo entered into a series of agreements with Blade
Securities Ltd , a special purpose company holding 49% of the equity shares of Termobahia
(consolidated by Petrobras). Under the agreements, PIFCo paid to Blade US$ 1,453, and in
return, Blade transfers to PIFCo the right of any dividends to be received from Termobahia
and the rights to the shares of Termobahia either for PIFCo or a Petrobras subsidiary.
Additionally, PIFCo paid to Blade US$ 38,185, and in return, Blade transfers to PIFCo any
amounts received from Termobahia related to the subordinated loan recorded as notes
receivable, which has an interest rate of 8% p.a. and an expiry date of 2023, and the right
to the loans receivable for PIFCo or a Petrobras subsidiary. Petrobras has the intention of
finding a strategic partner within one year time frame to purchase the Termobahia equity
interest and related loan. |
F-161
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In thousands of US dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Crude oil |
|
|
60,097 |
|
|
|
51,701 |
|
Oil products |
|
|
202,623 |
|
|
|
144,234 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262,720 |
|
|
|
195,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. |
|
Restricted Deposits and Guarantees |
|
|
|
PIFCo has restricted deposits with financial institutions that are required as a result of
contractual obligations in financing arrangements. The amount of US$ 76,389 classified in
current assets, relates to a deposit made in connection with the issuance of global notes in
the amount of US$ 500,000 (described in Note 8) and is renewed annually. The amount classified
in other assets is comprised of deposits: (i) US$ 31,585 related to issuances of senior notes
in the total amount of US$ 450,000; (ii) US$ 41,051 related to issuances of senior notes in the
total amount of US$ 600,000. The guarantees related to the financings will be maintained
through maturity of such financings (described in Note 8), and are required per the related
debt agreement; and (iii) in accordance with the Deposit, Pledge and Indemnity Agreement of
April 29, 2005, PIFCo has guaranteed the debt of Eletrobolt, a subsidiary of its parent. In
accordance with the terms of this guarantee, PIFCo has deposited US$ 95,949 in an escrow
account, such amount to be used to satisfy Eletrobolt debts in the event of default. |
F-162
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In thousands of US dollars)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current |
|
Long-term |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial institutions (i) |
|
|
329,180 |
|
|
|
493,550 |
|
|
|
1,041,250 |
|
|
|
1,194,750 |
|
Senior notes (iii) |
|
|
533,945 |
|
|
|
53,525 |
|
|
|
524,602 |
|
|
|
1,550,000 |
|
Global notes (iii) and (viii) |
|
|
32,725 |
|
|
|
26,326 |
|
|
|
2,181,420 |
|
|
|
2,115,263 |
|
Senior exchangeable notes (vii) |
|
|
333,684 |
|
|
|
3,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
329,940 |
|
Global step-up notes (iii) |
|
|
4,165 |
|
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
134,622 |
|
|
|
400,000 |
|
Japanese yen bonds (iv) |
|
|
1,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of right to future receivables (v) |
|
|
68,393 |
|
|
|
567,377 |
|
|
|
614,380 |
|
|
|
679,420 |
|
Assets related to export prepayment to
be offset against sale of right to
future receivables (vi) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150,000 |
) |
|
|
(150,000 |
) |
|
|
(150,000 |
) |
Repurchased securities (ii) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,681 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(210,957 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,303,750 |
|
|
|
998,841 |
|
|
|
4,640,134 |
|
|
|
5,908,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing |
|
|
148,447 |
|
|
|
339,503 |
|
|
|
4,640,134 |
|
|
|
5,908,416 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
1,057,438 |
|
|
|
551,628 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
97,865 |
|
|
|
107,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,303,750 |
|
|
|
998,841 |
|
|
|
4,640,134 |
|
|
|
5,908,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(i) |
|
The Companys borrowings in US dollars are derived mainly from commercial banks and
include trade lines of credit and commercial paper, which are primarily intended for the
purchase of crude oil and oil products, and with interest rates ranging from 5.14% to
9.42% at December 31, 2006. The weighted average borrowing rate for short-term debt at
December 31, 2006 and 2005 was 6.76% and 5.02%, respectively. |
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the Company had fully utilized all available lines of
credit specifically designated for purchase of imported crude oil and oil products. |
|
|
|
Additionally, the Company had available standby committed facilities in the amount of US$
675,000, which are not specified as to use requirements. PIFCo has no drawn down amounts
related to these facilities and does not have a scheduled date for the drawdown. |
F-163
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In thousands of US dollars)
(ii) |
|
On December 31, 2005, the Company had amounts invested in an exclusive portfolio of
an investment fund that held its own debt securities in the total amount of US$ 215,638.
These securities were considered to be extinguished, and thus the related amounts,
together with applicable interest, which comprise the current portion at the respective
date, have been removed from the presentation of marketable securities and short and
long-term debt. Gain and losses on extinguishment are recognized as incurred. Subsequent
reissuances of notes at amounts greater or lesser than par are recorded as premiums or
discounts and are amortized over the life of the notes. As of December 31, 2006 and
December 31, 2005, the outstanding balance of net premiums on reissuances amounted to
US$ 10,273 and US$ 18,464, respectively. PIFCo incurred in expenses in the total amount of
US$ 11,738 on extinguishment of debt during 2005 and US$ 160,048 during 2006. |
|
(iii) |
|
On July 24, 2006, PIFCo concluded its debt repurchase offer (Tender) announced on
July 18, 2006. The amount of notes tendered for five series of notes listed below was US$
888,260. Including the notes previously repurchased by Petrobras and its affiliates, also
included in the tender, the total value reached US$ 1,215,661. The purpose of this
initiative was to reduce total debt outstanding and simplify the debt profile, thus
benefiting from the Companys current strong cash generation. The transaction was settled
on July 27, 2006 and all the notes tendered were canceled from this date. Upon conclusion
of the debt repurchase offer (Tender), PIFCo incurred in expenses in the total amount of
US$ 160,048. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Repurchased |
|
Rate |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
US$ |
|
Global Step-Up Notes |
|
|
12.375 |
% |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
265,378 |
|
Senior Notes |
|
|
9.875 |
% |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
211,754 |
|
Senior Notes |
|
|
9.750 |
% |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
313,644 |
|
Global Notes |
|
|
9.125 |
% |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
251,665 |
|
Global Notes |
|
|
8.375 |
% |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
173,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,215,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-164
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In thousands of US dollars)
(iv) |
|
On September 27, 2006, the Company concluded a private placement of securities in the
Japanese capital market (Shibosai) for a total of ¥ 35 billion (US$ 297,780) due
September 2016. The issue was a private placement in Japanese market with a partial
guarantee of Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC) and bears interest at the
rate of 2.15% per annum, payable semiannually. PIFCo used the proceeds principally to
finance PNBV, an affiliate, for construction of lines interconnecting the P-51, P-52 and
P-53 production platforms to the PRA-1 autonomous repumping unit. |
|
|
|
In the same date, PIFCo entered into cross currency swaps under which it swaps the
principal and interest payments on Yen denominated funding into U.S. dollars; and
designated the hedging relationship as a qualifying cash flow hedge under SFAS 133. The
hedged item is a ¥ 35 billion 10 year issued bond, with a semi-annual coupon of 2.15% p.a.
The hedging instrument is a series of cross currency swaps, whose notional amounts,
underlyings and maturities match the terms of the funding; in which U.S. dollars are paid
and Japanese Yen are received. |
|
|
|
The transaction gain or loss arising from the remeasurement of Yen denominated bonds is
offset by the reclassification relating to the remeasurement of the hedged item at spot
rates from other comprehensive income to earnings. The cross currency swap at December 31,
2006 had a fair value of US$ 8,754 due to the devaluation of the Japanese Yen when
compared to U.S. dollar since the inception of the instrument. No amounts were recognized
in earnings during the year as hedge ineffectivenesses. Accumulated other comprehensive
income were reclassified at the reporting date in order to offset the foreign currency
exchange gain or losses on the hedged item. |
|
(v) |
|
On September 1, 2005, PFL prepaid the floating rate Senior Trust Certificates
(Series A2 and C) in accordance with the applicable provisions of the governing
agreements. In order to facilitate this advance payment, Petrobras prepaid to PFL an
amount of US$ 330,290 related to the export prepayment program. |
|
|
|
On March 1, 2006, PFL prepaid the fixed rate Senior Trust Certificates (Series A1 and B) in
accordance with the applicable provisions of the governing agreements in the amount of US$ 333,860.
On prepayment the fixed rate Senior Trust |
F-165
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In thousands of US dollars)
|
|
Certificates (Series A1 and B) PFL paid premium in the total amount of US$ 13,650. |
|
|
|
On May 26, 2006, PFL has successfully completed a solicitation of consents from holders
of the Series 2003-A 6.436% Senior Trust Certificates due 2015 issued by PF Export
Receivables Master Trust. The amendments sought to eliminate exports of bunker fuel from
the transaction so that the securities have been collateralized only by receivables from
sales of fuel oil exported by Petrobras and to reduce the minimum average daily gross
exports of fuel oil for any rolling twelve-month period. PFL also obtained the consent
from the holders of Series 2003-B 3.748% due 2013. The amendments became effective on
June 1, 2006. |
|
|
|
As a result of these amendments, the premium rate of the guarantee of the Series 2003-B
was reduced from 1.8% to 1.1%. |
|
(vi) |
|
In May 2004, PFL and the PF Export Trust (the Trust) executed an amendment to the
Trust Agreement allowing the Junior Trust Certificates to be set-off against the related
Notes, rather than paid in full, after fulfillment of all obligations pursuant to the
Senior Trust Certificates. The effect of this amendment is that amounts related to the
Junior Trust Certificates have been presented net, rather than gross in these
consolidated financial statements, and thus US$ 150,000 has been reduced from the long
term debt financing respective to sales of right to future receivables. |
|
(vii) |
|
On October 06, 2006, the Company issued Global Notes of US$ 500,000 due October,
2016. The notes bear interest at the rate of 6.125% per annum, payable semiannually. The
Company used the proceeds from this issuance principally to repay trade-related debt and
inter-company loans. |
F-166
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY
AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In thousands of US dollars)
|
|
|
Long-term financing additional information |
|
|
a) |
|
Long-term debt interest rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payment period |
|
|
|
Date of issuance |
|
|
Maturity |
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Principal |
|
Senior Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Notes |
|
May, 2001 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
9.875 |
% |
|
|
238,246 |
|
|
semiannually |
|
bullet |
Senior Notes |
|
January, 2002 |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
9.750 |
% |
|
|
286,356 |
|
|
semiannually |
|
bullet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
524,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sale of Right to Future
Receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Trust Certificates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Serie 2003-B |
|
May, 2003 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
3.748 |
% |
|
|
40,000 |
|
|
quarterly |
|
bullet |
Serie 2003-A |
|
May, 2003 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
6.436 |
% |
|
|
110,000 |
|
|
quarterly |
|
bullet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets related to export
prepayment to be offset
against sale of right to
future receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(150,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Trust Certificates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Serie 2003-B |
|
May, 2003 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
4.848 |
% |
|
|
131,520 |
|
|
quarterly |
|
quarterly |
Serie 2003-A |
|
May, 2003 |
|
|
2015 |
|
|
|
6.436 |
% |
|
|
332,860 |
|
|
quarterly |
|
quarterly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
464,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japanese yen bonds |
|
September, 2006 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
2.150 |
% |
|
|
293,860 |
|
|
semiannually |
|
bullet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
293,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Step-up Notes |
|
March, 2003 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
12.375 |
% |
|
|
134,622 |
|
|
semiannually |
|
bullet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
134,622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Notes |
|
July, 2003 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
9.125 |
% |
|
|
504,640 |
|
|
semiannually |
|
bullet |
Global Notes |
|
December, 2003 |
|
|
2018 |
|
|
|
8.375 |
% |
|
|
576,780 |
|
|
semiannually |
|
bullet |
Global Notes |
|
September, 2004 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
7.750 |
% |
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
semiannually |
|
bullet |
Global Notes |
|
October, 2006 |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
6.125 |
% |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
semiannually |
|
bullet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,181,420 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Institutions |
|
from 2005 |
|
up to 2017 |
|
from 6.46% to 9.42% |
|
|
1,041,250 |
|
|
various |
|
various |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,041,250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,640,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-167
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In thousands of US dollars)
|
|
|
Long-term financing additional information |
|
|
b) |
|
Long-term debt maturity date |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
2008 |
|
|
771,198 |
|
2009 |
|
|
217,218 |
|
2010 |
|
|
328,238 |
|
2011 |
|
|
376,664 |
|
2012 |
|
|
93,178 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
2,853,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,640,134 |
|
|
|
|
|
9. |
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
Fair values are derived either from quoted market prices available, or, in their absence, the
present value of expected cash flows. The fair values reflect the cash that would have been
received or paid if the instruments were settled at year end. Fair values of cash and cash
equivalents, trade receivables, short-term debt and trade payables approximate their carrying
values. |
|
|
|
At December 31, 2006 the Companys long-term debt was US$ 4,640,134 (US$ 5,908,416 at December
31, 2005) and had an estimated fair value of approximately US$ 5,050,000 (US$ 6,397,000 at
December 31, 2005). |
|
|
|
The Companys long-term asset related to the export prepayment program was US$ 464,380 and US$
529,420 at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and had fair values of US$ 466,000 and US$ 523,000,
respectively. |
F-168
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In thousands of US dollars)
10. |
|
Commitments and Contingencies |
|
(a) |
|
Commitments Purchases |
|
|
|
|
In an effort to ensure procurement of oil products for the Companys customers, the
Company currently has several short and long-term normal purchase contracts with maturity
date up to 2017, which collectively obligate it to purchase a minimum of approximately
129,925 barrels of crude oil and oil products per day at market prices. |
|
|
(b) |
|
Purchase Option Platforms |
|
|
|
|
The Company has maintained the right to exercise the call option on the existing
Subchartered Asset Option Agreement granted by PNBV and has maintained the obligation to
purchase the vessels in case the Owners exercise the Put Option, on condition of an event
of default, under the same Option Agreement, for the Platforms P-8, P-15, P-32. PIFCo also
has an obligation to purchase the platforms after the expiration of the Charter terms. |
|
|
|
|
In relation to Platform P-47, PIFCo has maintained the right to exercise the call option
on the existing Subchartered Asset Option Agreement granted by PNBV and has maintained the
obligation to purchase the vessel in case the Owner exercise the Put Option, on condition
of an event of default or of the expiration of the Charter. |
|
|
|
|
PIFCo may designate any affiliate or subsidiary to perform its obligations under this
agreement. |
Capital Increase
|
|
In September 2006, PETROBRAS changed the designation of US$ 120,000 in advances for future
capital and US$ 180,000 in notes receivable from PIFCo into a capital increase. |
F-169
PETROBRAS INTERNATIONAL FINANCE COMPANY AND SUBSIDIARIES
(A wholly-owned subsidiary of PETRÓLEO BRASILEIRO S.A. PETROBRAS)
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
(In thousands of US dollars)
12. |
|
Subsequent Events |
|
|
|
On January 4, 2007, PIFCo announced an offer for the exchange of securities (Exchange Offering)
totaling up to US$ 500,000 for five series of Notes. |
|
|
|
The objective of the Exchange was offer to the investors the opportunity to substitute the five
old notes listed bellow with PIFCos new benchmark, issued on October 6, 2006 with a 6.125% per
annum coupon and maturity in 2016. |
|
|
|
The settlement of the Exchange Offer occurred on February 7, 2007 and as result, PIFCo received
and accepted a tender amount of US$ 399,053 (face value of the Notes). All the Notes received
were cancelled in the same day and as consequence, PIFCo issue US$ 399,053 of Global Notes due
2016 that bear interest at the rate of 6.125% per annun, payable semi annually. The new Notes
constitute a single fungible series with the US$ 500,000 Global Notes due 2016 issued in
October 2006. In total, there will be US$ 899,053 in outstanding bonds due 2016. PIFCo also
paid to the investors a cash amount equivalent to US$ 56,056 as a result of the Exchange. The
table below presents the result of the Exchange. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Outstanding |
|
Total Amount |
PIFCo Old Notes |
|
Interest Rate |
|
Maturity |
|
after Exchange |
Tendered |
Global Step-Up Notes |
|
|
12.375 |
% |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
126,868 |
|
|
|
7,754 |
|
Senior Notes |
|
|
9.875 |
% |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
224,212 |
|
|
|
14,034 |
|
Senior Notes |
|
|
9.750 |
% |
|
|
2011 |
|
|
|
235,350 |
|
|
|
51,006 |
|
Global Notes |
|
|
9.125 |
% |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
374,211 |
|
|
|
124,124 |
|
Global Notes |
|
|
7.750 |
% |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
|
397,865 |
|
|
|
202,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,358,506 |
|
|
|
399,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal Outstanding |
|
|
PIFCo New Notes |
|
Interest Rate |
|
Maturity |
|
after Exchange |
|
Total Reopened |
Global Notes |
|
|
6.125 |
% |
|
|
2016 |
|
|
|
899,053 |
|
|
|
399,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
899,053 |
|
|
|
399,053 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * *
F-170