e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
(MARK ONE)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2006
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM TO .
Commission File No. 1-32058
Complete Production Services, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
72-1503959
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
11700 Old Katy Road,
Suite 300
Houston, Texas
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
77079
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (281) 372-2300
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filero Non-accelerated filer þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Number of shares of the Common Stock of the registrant outstanding as of August 1, 2006:
70,571,981
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Complete Production Services, Inc.
2
PART IFINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements.
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
June 30, 2006 (unaudited) and December 31, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except |
|
|
|
share data) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
10,373 |
|
|
$ |
11,405 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
112,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable, net |
|
|
202,158 |
|
|
|
167,395 |
|
Inventory, net |
|
|
51,501 |
|
|
|
41,290 |
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
|
18,603 |
|
|
|
25,404 |
|
Other current assets |
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
1,992 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
395,610 |
|
|
|
247,486 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
500,864 |
|
|
|
384,580 |
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization
of $3,329 and $2,487, respectively |
|
|
4,783 |
|
|
|
4,967 |
|
Deferred financing costs, net of accumulated
amortization of $255 and $96, respectively |
|
|
2,161 |
|
|
|
2,048 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
346,684 |
|
|
|
298,297 |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
|
419 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,250,521 |
|
|
$ |
937,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current maturities of long-term debt |
|
$ |
6,051 |
|
|
$ |
5,953 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
65,387 |
|
|
|
50,693 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
35,486 |
|
|
|
40,972 |
|
Unearned revenue |
|
|
2,702 |
|
|
|
6,407 |
|
Notes payable |
|
|
3,312 |
|
|
|
14,985 |
|
Taxes payable |
|
|
13,101 |
|
|
|
1,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
126,039 |
|
|
|
120,203 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
434,794 |
|
|
|
509,990 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
59,682 |
|
|
|
54,334 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
2,614 |
|
|
|
2,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
623,129 |
|
|
|
686,892 |
|
Commitments and contingencies
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value per share,
200,000,000 shares authorized, 69,782,732 (2005
55,531,510) issued |
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
555 |
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value per share,
5,000,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
535,242 |
|
|
|
220,786 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
72,152 |
|
|
|
16,885 |
|
Treasury stock, 35,570 shares at cost |
|
|
(202 |
) |
|
|
(202 |
) |
Deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,803 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
19,502 |
|
|
|
16,540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
627,392 |
|
|
|
250,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,250,521 |
|
|
$ |
937,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service |
|
$ |
234,420 |
|
|
$ |
141,628 |
|
|
$ |
469,539 |
|
|
$ |
273,615 |
|
Product |
|
|
41,006 |
|
|
|
27,011 |
|
|
|
81,623 |
|
|
|
56,275 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275,426 |
|
|
|
168,639 |
|
|
|
551,162 |
|
|
|
329,890 |
|
Service expenses |
|
|
139,323 |
|
|
|
87,440 |
|
|
|
274,834 |
|
|
|
167,110 |
|
Product expenses |
|
|
30,949 |
|
|
|
20,294 |
|
|
|
61,322 |
|
|
|
42,877 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
36,627 |
|
|
|
26,130 |
|
|
|
74,242 |
|
|
|
48,016 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
17,125 |
|
|
|
10,804 |
|
|
|
32,852 |
|
|
|
20,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before interest, taxes and minority
interest |
|
|
51,402 |
|
|
|
23,971 |
|
|
|
107,912 |
|
|
|
51,309 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
9,488 |
|
|
|
5,634 |
|
|
|
20,170 |
|
|
|
9,649 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
1,015 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,022 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before taxes and minority interest |
|
|
42,929 |
|
|
|
18,337 |
|
|
|
88,764 |
|
|
|
41,660 |
|
Taxes |
|
|
15,936 |
|
|
|
6,607 |
|
|
|
33,353 |
|
|
|
14,963 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before minority interest |
|
|
26,993 |
|
|
|
11,730 |
|
|
|
55,411 |
|
|
|
26,697 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(161 |
) |
|
|
3,354 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
6,566 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
27,154 |
|
|
$ |
8,376 |
|
|
$ |
55,267 |
|
|
$ |
20,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
67,067 |
|
|
|
43,471 |
|
|
|
61,366 |
|
|
|
42,477 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
69,065 |
|
|
|
48,378 |
|
|
|
63,953 |
|
|
|
47,126 |
|
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Three Months and Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
27,154 |
|
|
$ |
8,376 |
|
|
$ |
55,267 |
|
|
$ |
20,131 |
|
Change in cumulative translation adjustment |
|
|
3,080 |
|
|
|
(1,061 |
) |
|
|
2,962 |
|
|
|
(1,325 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
30,234 |
|
|
$ |
7,315 |
|
|
$ |
58,229 |
|
|
$ |
18,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
4
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders Equity
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Deferred |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Compensation |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share data) |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
55,531,510 |
|
|
$ |
555 |
|
|
$ |
220,786 |
|
|
$ |
(202 |
) |
|
$ |
16,885 |
|
|
$ |
(3,803 |
) |
|
$ |
16,540 |
|
|
$ |
250,761 |
|
Adoption of SFAS No. 123R |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,803 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,803 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,267 |
|
Cumulative translation
adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,962 |
|
|
|
2,962 |
|
Issuance of common stock: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from initial
public offering |
|
|
13,000,000 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
289,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
289,159 |
|
Acquisition of Parchman |
|
|
1,000,000 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
23,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,500 |
|
Acquisition of MGM |
|
|
164,210 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3,857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,859 |
|
Exercise of stock options |
|
|
15,474 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
Expense related to employee
stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
488 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
488 |
|
Excess tax benefit from
share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
109 |
|
Vested restricted stock |
|
|
71,538 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of non-vested
restricted stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,218 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
69,782,732 |
|
|
$ |
698 |
|
|
$ |
535,242 |
|
|
$ |
(202 |
) |
|
$ |
72,152 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,502 |
|
|
$ |
627,392 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
55,267 |
|
|
$ |
20,131 |
|
Items not affecting cash: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
32,852 |
|
|
|
20,578 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,853 |
|
|
|
8,968 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
6,566 |
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation |
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Non-cash compensation expense |
|
|
1,706 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
634 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(29,909 |
) |
|
|
(24,019 |
) |
Inventory |
|
|
(9,609 |
) |
|
|
(11,420 |
) |
Prepaid expense and other current assets |
|
|
5,451 |
|
|
|
(9,051 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
13,161 |
|
|
|
10,278 |
|
Accrued liabilities and other |
|
|
(1,517 |
) |
|
|
11,446 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73,440 |
|
|
|
34,365 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(36,163 |
) |
|
|
(9,833 |
) |
Additions to property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(132,423 |
) |
|
|
(42,684 |
) |
Purchase of short-term securities |
|
|
(165,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sale of short-term securities |
|
|
52,841 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from disposal of capital assets/other |
|
|
3,232 |
|
|
|
(160 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(277,513 |
) |
|
|
(52,677 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances of long-term debt |
|
|
180,646 |
|
|
|
220,681 |
|
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
|
(256,278 |
) |
|
|
(182,977 |
) |
Net repayments under lines of credit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,235 |
) |
Repayment of convertible debentures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,069 |
) |
Repayment of notes payable |
|
|
(11,272 |
) |
|
|
(732 |
) |
Proceeds from issuances of common stock |
|
|
290,407 |
|
|
|
10,452 |
|
Repurchase of common stock/warrants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(458 |
) |
Deferred financing fees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,543 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,612 |
|
|
|
22,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
(571 |
) |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(1,032 |
) |
|
|
3,839 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
|
11,405 |
|
|
|
11,547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
|
$ |
10,373 |
|
|
$ |
15,386 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
19,809 |
|
|
$ |
6,929 |
|
Cash paid for taxes |
|
$ |
16,385 |
|
|
$ |
2,348 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued for acquisitions |
|
$ |
27,359 |
|
|
$ |
19,065 |
|
Non-cash assets as acquisition consideration |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,899 |
|
Notes issued for acquisition |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
Debt acquired in acquisition |
|
$ |
534 |
|
|
$ |
750 |
|
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
1. General:
(a) Nature of operations:
Complete Production Services, Inc. is a provider of specialized services and products focused
on developing hydrocarbon reserves, reducing operating costs and enhancing production for oil and
gas companies. Complete Production Services, Inc. focuses its operations on basins within North
America and manages its operations from regional field service facilities located throughout the
U.S. Rocky Mountain region, Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Arkansas, Kansas, western Canada, Mexico
and Southeast Asia.
References to Complete, the Company, we, our and similar phrases are used throughout
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and relate collectively to Complete Production Services, Inc.
and its consolidated affiliates.
On September 12, 2005, we completed the combination (Combination) of Complete Energy
Services, Inc. (CES), Integrated Production Services, Inc. (IPS) and I.E. Miller Services, Inc.
(IEM) pursuant to which the CES and IEM shareholders exchanged all of their common stock for
common stock of IPS. The Combination was accounted for using the continuity of interests method of
accounting, which yields results similar to the pooling of interest method. Subsequent to the
Combination, IPS changed its name to Complete Production Services, Inc.
On April 20, 2006, we entered into an underwriting agreement in connection with our initial
public offering and became subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934. On April 21, 2006, our common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the
symbol CPX. On April 26, 2006, we completed our initial public offering. See Note 8,
Stockholders Equity.
(b) Basis of presentation:
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements reflect all normal recurring
adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the financial
position of Complete as of June 30, 2006 and the statements of operations and the statements of
comprehensive income for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006, as well as the
statement of stockholders equity at June 30, 2006 and the statements of cash flows for the six
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005. Certain information and disclosures normally included in
annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted.
These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our
audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2005. We believe that
these financial statements contain all adjustments necessary so that they are not misleading.
In preparing financial statements, we make informed judgments and estimates that affect the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and affect
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, we
review our estimates, including those related to impairment of long-lived assets and goodwill,
contingencies and income taxes. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates
and actual results may differ from these estimates.
The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results of
operations that could be expected for the full year. Certain reclassifications have been made to
2005 amounts in order to present these results on a comparable basis with amounts for 2006. These
reclassifications had no impact on reported net income.
7
2. Business combinations:
(a) Acquisitions During the Six Months Ended June 30, 2006:
|
(i) |
|
Outpost Office Inc. (Outpost): |
On January 3, 2006, we acquired all of the operating assets of Outpost Office
Inc., an oilfield equipment rental company based in Grand Junction, Colorado, for
$6,542 in cash, and recorded goodwill of $2,348, which has been allocated entirely to
the completion and production services business segment. We believe this acquisition
supplemented our completion and production services business in the Rocky Mountain
Region.
|
(ii) |
|
The Rosel Company (Rosel): |
On January 25, 2006, we acquired all the equity interests of The Rosel Company,
a cased-hole and open-hole electric-line business based in Liberal, Kansas, for
approximately $11,953, net of cash acquired and debt assumed, and recorded goodwill
of $7,997 resulting from this acquisition, which has been allocated entirely to the
completion and production services business segment. We believe this acquisition
expanded our presence in the Mid-continent region and enhanced our completion and
production services business.
|
(iii) |
|
The Arkoma Group of Companies (Arkoma): |
On June 30, 2006, we acquired certain operating assets of J&M Rental Tool, Inc.
dba Arkoma Machine & Fishing Tools, Arkoma Machine Shop, Inc. and N&M Supply, LLC,
collectively referred to as The Arkoma Group of Companies, a provider of rental
tools, machining and fishing services in the Fayetteville Shale and Arkoma Basin,
located in Ft. Smith, Arkansas. We paid $18,002 to acquire Arkoma, subject to a
final working capital adjustment, and recorded goodwill totaling $9,257, which has
been allocated entirely to the completion and production services business segment.
We believe this acquisition provides a platform to further expand our presence in the
Fayetteville Shale and Arkoma Basin and supplement our completion and production
services business in that region.
Results for each of these acquisitions have been included in our accounts and results of
operations since the date of acquisition. We have not finalized the purchase price allocation for
these acquisitions. The following table summarizes the preliminary purchase price allocations as
of June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outpost |
|
|
Rosel |
|
|
Arkoma |
|
|
Totals |
|
Net assets acquired: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
$ |
4,297 |
|
|
$ |
5,615 |
|
|
$ |
6,587 |
|
|
$ |
16,499 |
|
Non-cash working capital |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
2,008 |
|
|
|
2,162 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
613 |
|
Deferred tax liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,845 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,845 |
) |
Goodwill |
|
|
2,348 |
|
|
|
7,997 |
|
|
|
9,257 |
|
|
|
19,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
$ |
6,542 |
|
|
$ |
12,487 |
|
|
$ |
18,002 |
|
|
$ |
37,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, net of cash and cash equivalents acquired |
|
$ |
6,542 |
|
|
$ |
11,953 |
|
|
$ |
18,002 |
|
|
$ |
36,497 |
|
Debt assumed in acquisition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
534 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration |
|
$ |
6,542 |
|
|
$ |
12,487 |
|
|
$ |
18,002 |
|
|
$ |
37,031 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
3. Inventory:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Finished goods |
|
$ |
39,145 |
|
|
$ |
30,306 |
|
Manufacturing parts and materials |
|
|
14,716 |
|
|
|
12,966 |
|
Bulk fuel |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,910 |
|
|
|
43,360 |
|
Inventory reserves |
|
|
2,409 |
|
|
|
2,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
51,501 |
|
|
$ |
41,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Accounts receivable:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade accounts receivable |
|
$ |
186,732 |
|
|
$ |
158,585 |
|
Unbilled revenue |
|
|
15,125 |
|
|
|
9,636 |
|
Notes receivable |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
193 |
|
Other receivables |
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,973 |
|
|
|
169,297 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
1,902 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
202,158 |
|
|
$ |
167,395 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Property, plant and equipment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
Cost |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Value |
|
Land |
|
$ |
5,301 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,301 |
|
Building |
|
|
7,378 |
|
|
|
745 |
|
|
|
6,633 |
|
Field equipment |
|
|
476,821 |
|
|
|
92,331 |
|
|
|
384,490 |
|
Vehicles |
|
|
39,552 |
|
|
|
10,473 |
|
|
|
29,079 |
|
Office furniture and computers |
|
|
8,676 |
|
|
|
2,029 |
|
|
|
6,647 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
7,371 |
|
|
|
531 |
|
|
|
6,840 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
61,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,874 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
606,973 |
|
|
$ |
106,109 |
|
|
$ |
500,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Net Book |
|
December 31, 2005 |
|
Cost |
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
Value |
|
Land |
|
$ |
4,906 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,906 |
|
Building |
|
|
6,798 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
6,189 |
|
Field equipment |
|
|
376,979 |
|
|
|
64,272 |
|
|
|
312,707 |
|
Vehicles |
|
|
37,848 |
|
|
|
8,692 |
|
|
|
29,156 |
|
Office furniture and computers |
|
|
5,667 |
|
|
|
1,374 |
|
|
|
4,293 |
|
Leasehold improvements |
|
|
4,083 |
|
|
|
507 |
|
|
|
3,576 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
23,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
460,034 |
|
|
$ |
75,454 |
|
|
$ |
384,580 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction in progress at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005 primarily included progress
payments to vendors for equipment to be delivered in future periods and component parts to be used
in final assembly of operating equipment, which in all cases were not yet placed into service at
the time. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, we recorded capitalized interest of $157 related
to assets that we are constructing for internal use and amounts paid to vendors under progress
payments for assets that are being constructed on our behalf.
6. Notes Payable:
On January 5, 2006, we entered into a note agreement with our insurance broker to finance our
annual insurance premiums for the policy year beginning December 1, 2005 through November 30, 2006.
As of December 31, 2005, we recorded a note payable totaling $14,584 and an offsetting prepaid
asset which included a brokers fee of $600. We are amortizing the prepaid asset to expense over
the policy term, and expect to incur finance charges totaling $268 as interest expense related to
this arrangement over the policy term. Of the total amount financed, $3,312 remains outstanding at
June 30, 2006.
7. Long-term debt:
The following table summarizes long-term debt as of June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
U.S. term loan facility (a) |
|
$ |
416,850 |
|
|
$ |
418,950 |
|
U.S. revolving credit facility (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,096 |
|
Canadian revolving credit facility (a) |
|
|
17,409 |
|
|
|
27,016 |
|
Subordinated seller notes (b) |
|
|
3,450 |
|
|
|
8,450 |
|
Capital leases and other |
|
|
3,136 |
|
|
|
3,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440,845 |
|
|
|
515,943 |
|
Less: current maturities of long-term debt and capital leases |
|
|
6,051 |
|
|
|
5,953 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
434,794 |
|
|
$ |
509,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Concurrent with the consummation of the Combination on September 12, 2005, we entered
into a syndicated senior secured credit facility (the Credit Facility) pursuant to which
all bank debt held by IPS, CES and IEM was repaid and replaced with the proceeds from the
Credit Facility. The Credit Facility was comprised of a $420,000 term loan credit
facility that will mature in September 2012, a U.S. revolving credit facility of $130,000
that will mature in September 2010, and a Canadian revolving credit facility of $30,000
that will mature in September 2010. Interest on the Credit Facility was to be determined
by reference to the London Inter-bank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a margin of 1.25% to
2.75% (depending on the ratio of total debt to EBITDA, as defined in the agreement) for
revolving advances and a margin of 2.75% for term loan advances. Interest on advances
under the Canadian revolving facility was to be calculated at the Canadian Prime Rate plus
a margin of 0.25% to 1.75%. Quarterly principal repayments of 0.25% of the original
principal amount are required for the term loans, which commenced in December 2005. The
Credit Facility contains covenants restricting the levels of certain transactions
including: entering into certain loans, the granting of certain liens, capital
expenditures, acquisitions, distributions to stockholders, certain asset dispositions and
operating leases. The Credit Facility is secured by substantially all of our assets. |
10
|
|
|
On March 29, 2006, our lenders amended and restated the Credit Facility to provide for,
among other things: (1) an increase in the amount of the U.S. revolving credit facility to
$170,000 from $130,000; (2) an increase in the level of capital expenditures permitted
under the agreement for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2007; (3) a waiver of the
requirement to prepay up to $50,000 of term debt using the first $100,000 of proceeds from
an equity offering in 2006; and (4) a reduction in the Eurocurrency margin on the term loan
to LIBOR plus 2.50%. In addition, at any time prior to the maturity of the facility, and
as long as no default or event of default has occurred (and is continuing), we have the
right to increase the aggregate commitments under the amended Credit Facility by a total of
up to $150,000, subject to receiving commitments from one or more lenders totaling this
amount. |
|
|
|
|
On April 28, 2006, we repaid all outstanding borrowings under our U.S. revolving credit
facility using a portion of the proceeds from our initial public offering totaling
$127,500. See Note 8, Stockholders Equity. Subsequent borrowings under the swingline
portion of this U.S. revolving facility were repaid with funds from current operations. |
|
|
|
|
We were in compliance with all debt covenants under the amended Credit Facility as of June
30, 2006. Borrowings outstanding under the term loan portion of the amended Credit
Facility bore interest at 7.66% as of June 30, 2006, while borrowings under the Canadian
revolving portion of the facility bore interest at 7.25%. For the three months and six
months ended June 30, 2006, the weighted average interest rate on average borrowings under
the amended Credit Facility was approximately 7.62% and 7.63%, respectively. There were
letters of credit outstanding under the U.S. revolving portion of the facility totaling
$10,238 which reduced the available borrowing capacity as of June 30, 2006. We incurred
fees of 2.25% of the total amount outstanding under letter of credit arrangements through
June 30, 2006. |
|
|
(b) |
|
On February 11, 2005, we issued subordinated notes totaling $5,000 to certain sellers
of Parchman common shares in connection with the acquisition of Parchman. These notes
were unsecured, subordinated to all present and future senior debt and bore interest at
6.0% during the first three years of the note, 8.0% during year four and 10.0% thereafter.
The notes matured in early May 2006 due to acceleration as a
result of our initial public offering. On May 3, 2006, we repaid all principal and accrued
interest outstanding pursuant to these note agreements totaling $5,029. |
|
|
|
|
We issued subordinated seller notes totaling $3,450 in 2004 related to certain business
acquisitions. These notes bear interest at 6% and mature in March 2009. |
8. Stockholders equity:
(a) Initial Public Offering:
On April 26, 2006, we sold 13,000,000 shares of our $.01 par value common stock in our initial
public offering. These shares were offered to the public at $24.00 per share, and we recorded
proceeds of approximately $292,500 after underwriter fees. In addition, we incurred transaction
costs of $3,341 associated with the issuance that were netted against the proceeds of the offering.
Our stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on April 21, 2006. We used approximately
$127,500 of the proceeds from this offering to retire principal and interest outstanding under the
U.S. revolving credit facility as of April 28, 2006. Of the remaining funds, approximately
$165,000 was invested in tax-free or tax-advantaged municipal bond funds and similar financial
instruments with a term of less than one year. We liquidated a portion of these short-term
investments to purchase capital assets, acquire Arkoma and for other general corporate purposes.
At June 30, 2006, our remaining investment in these municipal bond funds totaled $112,159, and was
included in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet under the caption Short-term Investments.
We consider these short-term investments to be held for sale in accordance with SFAS No. 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities. These investments do not
appreciate or depreciate with changes in market value but rather provide only investment income.
These investments are expected to be liquidated within the next twelve months to fund future
acquisitions, capital expenditures and for other general corporate purposes. See Note 13,
Subsequent Events.
11
The following table summarizes the pro forma impact of our initial public offering on earnings
per share for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, assuming the 13,000,000
shares had been issued on January 1, 2005. No pro forma adjustments have been made to net income
as reported.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
Net income as reported |
|
$ |
27,154 |
|
|
$ |
8,376 |
|
|
$ |
55,267 |
|
|
$ |
20,131 |
|
Basic earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.19 |
|
|
$ |
0.90 |
|
|
$ |
0.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.80 |
|
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As reported |
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pro forma |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) Stock-based Compensation:
We maintain each of the option plans previously maintained by IPS, CES and IEM. Under the
three option plans, stock-based compensation could be granted to employees, officers and directors
to purchase up to 2,540,485 common shares, 3,003,463 common shares and 986,216 common shares,
respectively. The exercise price of each option is based on the fair value of the individual
companys stock at the date of grant. Options may be exercised over a five or ten-year period and
generally a third of the options vest on each of the first three anniversaries from the grant date.
We adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R on January 1, 2006.
This pronouncement requires that we measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for
an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award, with limited
exceptions, by using an option pricing model to determine fair value.
|
(i) |
|
Employee Stock Options Granted Prior to September 30, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
As required by SFAS No. 123R, we continue to account for stock-based compensation for
grants made prior to September 30, 2005, the date of our initial filing with the Securities
and Exchange Commission, using the intrinsic value method prescribed by Accounting
Principles Board (APB) No. 25, whereby no compensation expense is recognized for
stock-based compensation grants that have an exercise price equal to the fair value of the
stock on the date of grant. |
|
|
(ii) |
|
Employee Stock Options Granted Between October 1, 2005 and December 31, 2005: |
|
|
|
|
For grants of stock-based compensation between October 1, 2005 and December 31, 2005 (prior
to adoption of SFAS No. 123R), we have utilized the modified prospective transition method
to record expense associated with these stock-based compensation instruments. Under this
transition method, we did not record compensation expense associated with these stock
option grants during the period October 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005, but will provide
pro forma disclosure, as appropriate. Beginning January 1, 2006, upon adoption of SFAS No.
123R, we began to recognize expense related to these option grants over the applicable
vesting period. For the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006, we recognized
expense totaling $77 and $154, respectively, resulting in a reduction of net income of $48
and $96, respectively. There was no impact on basic and diluted earnings per share as
reported for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006. The unrecognized
compensation costs related to the non-vested portion of these awards was $703 as of June
30, 2006 and will be recognized over a three-year vesting period. |
|
|
|
|
During the period October 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005, we estimated the fair value of
stock-based compensation using a risk free interest rate ranging from 4.23% to 4.47% and an
expected life of 4.5 years. The weighted average fair value of options granted during this
period was $2.05 per share. |
12
|
(iii) |
|
Employee Stock Options Granted On or After January 1, 2006: |
|
|
|
|
For grants of stock-based compensation on or after January 1, 2006, we apply the
prospective transition method under SFAS No. 123R, whereby we recognize expense associated
with new awards of stock-based compensation ratably, as determined using a Black-Scholes
pricing model, over the expected term of the award. |
|
|
|
|
During the quarter ended June 30, 2006, the Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors authorized the
grant of 835,200 employee stock options and 64,800 non-vested restricted shares to our
officers and employees. Of the stock options authorized, options to purchase 761,400
shares of our common stock were granted on April 20, 2006 and options to purchase 7,500
shares of our common stock were granted on May 25, 2006. These stock option grants have an
exercise price of $24.00 and $23.15, respectively, representing the fair market value on the date of grant,
and vest over a three-year term at 33 1/3% per year. Additionally, the directors annual grant of 35,000 options (5,000 per
director) and director Matthew Ralls initial grant of 5,000 stock options were granted,
each with a date of grant of April 20, 2006, at an exercise price of $24.00, and which will
vest ratably over a four-year term. The directors also received an aggregate of 16,672
shares of non-vested restricted stock on April 20, 2006, representing the same initial and
annual grants of restricted stock as for the above options, which will vest over a period of
twelve months. The fair value of this stock-based compensation was determined by applying
a Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option Grant Date |
Assumptions: |
|
April 20, 2006 |
|
May 25, 2006 |
Risk-free rate |
|
4.99% to 5.02% |
|
|
4.97 |
% |
Expected term (in years) |
|
2.2 to 5.1 |
|
|
3.7 |
|
Volatility |
|
37% |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculated fair value per option |
|
$6.26 to $9.81 |
|
$ |
7.91 |
|
|
|
|
We completed our initial public offering in April 2006. Therefore, we did not have
sufficient historical market data in order to determine the volatility of our common stock.
In accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123R, we analyzed the market data of peer
companies and calculated an average volatility factor based upon changes in the closing
price of these companies common stock for a three-year period. This volatility factor was
then applied as a variable to determine the fair value of our stock options granted during
the six months ended June 30, 2006. |
|
|
|
|
We projected a rate of stock option forfeitures based upon historical experience and
management assumptions related to the expected term of the options. After adjusting for
these forfeitures, we expect to recognize expense totaling $6,045 over the three-year
vesting period of these stock options. For the period from the date of grant until June
30, 2006, we have recognized expense totaling $334, which represents a reduction of net
income before taxes and minority interest. The impact on net income was a reduction of
$208 for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006, or a reduction of $0.01 per
diluted share for the respective periods. The unrecognized compensation costs related to
the non-vested portion of these awards was $5,711 as of June 30, 2006 and will be
recognized over the remaining vesting period. |
|
|
|
|
The non-vested restricted shares were granted at fair value on the date of grant, or $24.00
per share, for which we may recognize compensation expense related to grants to officers
and employees totaling $1,555 over the three-year vesting period and compensation expense
related to grants to directors totaling $400 over a twelve-month vesting period. For the
period from the date of grant until June 30, 2006, we have recognized expense totaling $86
related to these non-vested restricted shares. |
The following tables provide a roll forward of stock options from December 31, 2005 to
June 30, 2006 and a summary of stock options outstanding by exercise price range at June
30, 2006:
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Price |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
3,512,444 |
|
|
$ |
5.42 |
|
Granted |
|
|
808,900 |
|
|
$ |
23.99 |
|
Exercised |
|
|
(15,474 |
) |
|
$ |
4.48 |
|
Cancelled |
|
|
(106,462 |
) |
|
$ |
4.87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
4,199,408 |
|
|
$ |
9.02 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
Options Exercisable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Outstanding at |
|
Average |
|
Average |
|
Exercisable at |
|
Average |
|
|
June 30, |
|
Remaining |
|
Exercise |
|
June 30, |
|
Exercise |
Range of Exercise Price |
|
2006 |
|
Life (months) |
|
Price |
|
2006 |
|
Price |
$2.00 2.20 |
|
|
763,154 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
|
|
503,839 |
|
|
$ |
2.04 |
|
$3.94 |
|
|
71,797 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
3.94 |
|
|
|
71,797 |
|
|
$ |
3.94 |
|
$4.48 4.80 |
|
|
1,239,433 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
$ |
4.68 |
|
|
|
639,704 |
|
|
$ |
4.61 |
|
$5.00 |
|
|
206,160 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
|
|
68,720 |
|
|
$ |
5.00 |
|
$6.69 |
|
|
630,196 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
$ |
6.69 |
|
|
|
181,526 |
|
|
$ |
6.69 |
|
$11.66 |
|
|
481,268 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
$ |
11.66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$23.15 24.00 |
|
|
807,400 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
$ |
23.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,199,408 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
$ |
9.02 |
|
|
|
1,465,586 |
|
|
$ |
3.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the six months ended June 30,
2006 was $294. The total intrinsic value of all vested outstanding stock options at June
30, 2006 was $28,829.
(b) Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Incentive Plan:
On March 28, 2006, our Board of Directors approved an amendment to the 2001 Stock Incentive
Plan which increased the maximum number of shares issuable under the plan to 4,500,000 from
2,540,485, pursuant to which we could grant up to 1,959,515 additional shares of stock-based
compensation, as of that date, to our directors, officers and employees. On April 12, 2006, stockholders owning more
than a majority of the shares of our common stock adopted the amendment to the 2001 Stock Incentive
Plan.
(c) Non-vested Restricted Stock:
At June 30, 2006, in accordance with SFAS No. 123R, we no longer present deferred compensation
as a contra-equity account, but rather have presented the amortization of non-vested restricted
stock as an increase in additional paid-in capital. At June 30, 2006, amounts not yet recognized
related to non-vested stock totaled $5,022, which represents the unamortized expense associated
with awards of non-vested stock granted to employees, officers and directors under our compensation
plans, including $1,955 and $2,564 related to grants made during the quarter and six months ended
June 30, 2006. Compensation expense associated with these grants of non-vested stock is determined
as the fair value of the shares on the date of grant, and recognized ratably over the applicable
vesting period. We recognized compensation expense associated with non-vested restricted stock
totaling $596 and $1,218 for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006. At December 31, 2005,
we presented unrecognized amortization as a contra-equity account called Deferred Compensation
totaling $3,803.
The following table summarizes the change in non-vested restricted stock from December 31,
2005 to June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested Restricted Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Number |
|
Grant Price |
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
786,170 |
|
|
$ |
5.74 |
|
Granted |
|
|
107,375 |
|
|
$ |
23.89 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(79,752 |
) |
|
$ |
6.04 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(24,544 |
) |
|
$ |
6.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
|
|
789,249 |
|
|
$ |
8.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
(d) Common Shares Issued for Acquisitions:
In accordance with the agreements relating to the acquisitions of Parchman Energy Group, Inc.
and MGM Well Services, Inc., entered into in February 2005 and December 2004, respectively, we
issued 1,000,000 shares and 164,210 shares, respectively, to the former owners of these companies
during the first quarter of 2006, based upon our operating results. As a result of these
issuances, we recorded common stock and additional paid-in capital totaling $27,359 with a
corresponding increase in goodwill.
9. Earnings per Share:
We compute basic earnings per share by dividing net income by the weighted average number of
common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common and potential common
share includes the weighted average of additional shares associated with the incremental effect of
dilutive employee stock options, non-vested restricted stock, contingent shares, stock warrants
and convertible debentures, as determined using the treasury stock method prescribed by SFAS No.
128, Earnings Per Share. The following table reconciles basic and diluted weighted average
shares used in the computation of earnings per share for the three months and six months ended June
30, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, 2006 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
(unaudited, in thousands) |
Weighted average basic common
shares outstanding |
|
|
67,067 |
|
|
|
43,471 |
|
|
|
61,366 |
|
|
|
42,477 |
|
Effect of dilutive securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock options |
|
|
1,715 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
Non-vested restricted stock |
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
430 |
|
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
Contingent shares (a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
608 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock warrants (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,021 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,848 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average diluted
common and potential common
shares outstanding |
|
|
69,065 |
|
|
|
48,378 |
|
|
|
63,953 |
|
|
|
47,126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Contingent shares represent potential common stock issuable to the former owners of
Parchman and MGM pursuant to the respective purchase agreements based upon 2005 operating
results. On March 31, 2006, we calculated and issued the actual shares earned totaling
1,214 shares. |
|
(b) |
|
All outstanding stock warrants were exercised or cancelled as of September 12, 2005,
the date of the Combination. |
We excluded the impact of anti-dilutive potential common shares from the calculation of
diluted weighted average shares for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
If these potential common shares were included, the impact would have been a decrease in weighted
average shares outstanding of 5,758 shares and 2,895 shares for the three months and six months
ended June 30, 2006, respectively, resulting in diluted weighted average shares of 69,059,398
shares and 63,949,771 shares, respectively. The impact for the three months and six months ended
June 30, 2005 would have been a decrease in weighted average shares of 150,067 shares and 193,532
shares, respectively, resulting in diluted weighted average shares of 48,227,967 shares and
46,932,588 shares, respectively. If these anti-dilutive potential common shares had been included
in the calculation of diluted weighted average shares, there would have been no impact on diluted
earnings per share as disclosed for all periods presented in the accompanying income statements.
10. Segment information:
SFAS No. 131, Disclosure About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, establishes
standards for the reporting of information about operating segments, products and services,
geographic areas, and major customers. The method of determining what information to report is
based on the way our management organizes the operating segments for making operational decisions
and assessing financial performance. We evaluate performance and allocate resources based on net
income before interest expense,
15
taxes, depreciation and amortization and minority interest
(EBITDA). The calculation of EBITDA should
not be viewed as a substitute for calculations under U.S. GAAP, in particular net income.
EBITDA calculated by us may not be comparable to the EBITDA calculation of another company.
We have three reportable operating segments: completion and production services (C&PS),
drilling services and product sales. The accounting policies of our reporting segments are the same
as those used to prepare our unaudited consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2006.
Inter-segment transactions are accounted for on a cost recovery basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling |
|
|
Product |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C&PS |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
$ |
183,270 |
|
|
$ |
51,150 |
|
|
$ |
41,006 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
275,426 |
|
EBITDA, as defined |
|
$ |
49,091 |
|
|
$ |
18,236 |
|
|
$ |
5,188 |
|
|
$ |
(3,988 |
) |
|
$ |
68,527 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
14,001 |
|
|
$ |
2,284 |
|
|
$ |
575 |
|
|
$ |
265 |
|
|
$ |
17,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
35,090 |
|
|
$ |
15,952 |
|
|
$ |
4,613 |
|
|
$ |
(4,253 |
) |
|
$ |
51,402 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
57,483 |
|
|
$ |
12,990 |
|
|
$ |
2,575 |
|
|
$ |
379 |
|
|
$ |
73,427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets |
|
$ |
867,351 |
|
|
$ |
168,398 |
|
|
$ |
93,577 |
|
|
$ |
121,195 |
|
|
$ |
1,250,521 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
$ |
112,866 |
|
|
$ |
28,762 |
|
|
$ |
27,011 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
168,639 |
|
EBITDA, as defined |
|
$ |
23,739 |
|
|
$ |
8,647 |
|
|
$ |
3,516 |
|
|
$ |
(1,127 |
) |
|
$ |
34,775 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
8,634 |
|
|
$ |
1,322 |
|
|
$ |
369 |
|
|
$ |
479 |
|
|
$ |
10,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
15,105 |
|
|
$ |
7,325 |
|
|
$ |
3,147 |
|
|
$ |
(1,606 |
) |
|
$ |
23,971 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
15,923 |
|
|
$ |
5,938 |
|
|
$ |
614 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
22,567 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets |
|
$ |
706,135 |
|
|
$ |
137,556 |
|
|
$ |
74,344 |
|
|
$ |
19,618 |
|
|
$ |
937,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling |
|
|
Product |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
C&PS |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
$ |
374,359 |
|
|
$ |
95,180 |
|
|
$ |
81,623 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
551,162 |
|
EBITDA, as defined |
|
$ |
103,701 |
|
|
$ |
34,256 |
|
|
$ |
10,734 |
|
|
$ |
(7,927 |
) |
|
$ |
140,764 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
26,835 |
|
|
$ |
4,302 |
|
|
$ |
1,078 |
|
|
$ |
637 |
|
|
$ |
32,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
76,866 |
|
|
$ |
29,954 |
|
|
$ |
9,656 |
|
|
$ |
(8,564 |
) |
|
$ |
107,912 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
97,832 |
|
|
$ |
25,706 |
|
|
$ |
6,138 |
|
|
$ |
2,747 |
|
|
$ |
132,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from external customers |
|
$ |
218,259 |
|
|
$ |
55,356 |
|
|
$ |
56,275 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
329,890 |
|
EBITDA, as defined |
|
$ |
49,848 |
|
|
$ |
16,519 |
|
|
$ |
7,453 |
|
|
$ |
(1,933 |
) |
|
$ |
71,887 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
16,750 |
|
|
$ |
2,537 |
|
|
$ |
745 |
|
|
$ |
546 |
|
|
$ |
20,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
33,098 |
|
|
$ |
13,982 |
|
|
$ |
6,708 |
|
|
$ |
(2,479 |
) |
|
$ |
51,309 |
|
Capital expenditures |
|
$ |
31,560 |
|
|
$ |
9,821 |
|
|
$ |
925 |
|
|
$ |
378 |
|
|
$ |
42,684 |
|
The following table summarizes the changes in the carrying amount of goodwill by segment
for the six months ended June 30, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drilling |
|
|
Product |
|
|
|
|
|
|
C&PS |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance at December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
247,792 |
|
|
$ |
33,827 |
|
|
$ |
16,678 |
|
|
$ |
298,297 |
|
Acquisitions |
|
|
19,602 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,602 |
|
Stock issued in accordance with
earn-out provisions of purchase
agreements |
|
|
27,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,359 |
|
Contingency adjustment and other |
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(251 |
) |
Foreign currency translation |
|
|
1,514 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163 |
|
|
|
1,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2006 |
|
$ |
296,016 |
|
|
$ |
33.827 |
|
|
$ |
16,841 |
|
|
$ |
346,684 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11. Legal Matters and Contingencies:
We operate in a dangerous environment. In the normal course of our business, we are party to
various pending or threatened claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings seeking damages or
other remedies concerning our commercial operations, products, employees and other matters,
including warranty and product liability claims and occasional claims by individuals alleging
exposure to hazardous materials, on
16
the job injuries and fatalities as a result of our products or
operations. Many of the claims filed against us relate to motor vehicle accidents which can result
in the loss of life or serious bodily injury. Some of these
claims relate to matters occurring prior to our acquisition of businesses. In certain cases,
we are entitled to indemnification from the sellers of businesses.
Although we cannot know the outcome of pending legal proceedings and the effect such outcomes
may have on us, we believe that any ultimate liability resulting from the outcome of such
proceedings, to the extent not otherwise provided for or covered by insurance, will not have a
material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
12. Recent accounting pronouncements:
In June 2006, the FASB issued an interpretation entitled Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxesan interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, referred to as FIN 48. FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertain tax positions that may have been taken by an entity. Specifically, FIN 48
prescribes a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold to measure a tax position taken or expected
to be taken in a tax return through a two-step process: (1) determining whether it is more likely
than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities, after all
appeals, based upon the technical merits of the position; and (2) measuring to determine the amount
of benefit/expense to recognize in the financial statements, assuming taxing authorities have all
relevant information concerning the issue. The tax position is measured at the largest amount of
benefit/expense that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
This pronouncement also specifies how to present a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in a
classified balance sheet, but does not change the classification requirements for deferred taxes.
Under FIN 48, if a tax position previously failed the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold,
it should be recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which the threshold
is met. Similarly, a position that no longer meets this recognition threshold, should be
derecognized in the first financial reporting period that the threshold is no longer met. FIN 48
becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with earlier adoption
encouraged. We are currently evaluating the effect this pronouncement may have on our financial
position, results of operations and cash flows.
13. Subsequent events:
On July 17, 2006, we acquired all the assets of CHB Holdings Partnership, Ltd. (CHB), a
fluid handling and disposal services business located in Henderson, Texas, for $12,738 in cash.
The purchase price allocation related to this acquisition has not yet been finalized. We will
include the accounts of CHB in our completion and production services business segment from the
date of acquisition. We believe this acquisition is complementary to our fluid handling business
in the Bossier Trend region of east Texas. We acquired CHB with a portion of the proceeds from our
initial public offering, which had been invested in short-term investments as of June 30, 2006.
On July 28, 2006, we acquired all of the outstanding equity interests of the Turner group of
companies (Turner Energy Services, LLC, Turner Energy SWD, LLC, T. & J. Energy, LLC, T. & J. SWD,
LLC and Loyd Jones Well Service, LLC) for $53,778 in cash, subject to a final working capital adjustment. The Turner group of companies
(Turner) is based in the Texas panhandle in Canadian, Texas, and owns a fleet of well service
rigs, and provides other wellsite services such as fishing, equipment rental, fluid handling and
salt water disposal services. The purchase price allocation related to this acquisition has not
yet been finalized. We will include the accounts of Turner in our completion and production
services business segment from the date of acquisition. We believe this acquisition will
supplement our completion and production services business in the Mid-continent region. We
acquired Turner with a portion of the proceeds from our initial public offering, which had been
invested in short-term investments as of June 30, 2006.
On July 31, 2006, we acquired certain assets of Quinn Well Control Ltd. (Quinn), a slickline
business located in Grande Prairie, Alberta, Canada, for $8,876 in cash. The purchase price
allocation related to this acquisition has not yet been finalized. We will include the accounts of
Quinn in our completion and production services business segment from the date of acquisition. We
believe this acquisition will enhance our Canadian slick-line business and expand our geographic
reach in northern Alberta and northeast British Columbia. We acquired Quinn with funds from
current operations.
17
On August 1, 2006, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Pinnacle Drilling Co.,
L.L.C. (Pinnacle), a drilling company located in Tolar, Texas, for $31,633 in cash. Pinnacle
operates three
drilling rigs, two in the Barnett Shale region in north Texas and one in east Texas. The
purchase price allocation for Pinnacle has not yet been finalized. We will include the accounts of
Pinnacle in our drilling services business segment from the date of acquisition. We believe this
acquisition will increase our presence in the Barnett Shale of north Texas and the Bossier Trend of
east Texas and expand our capacity to drill deep and horizontal wells, which are sought by our
customers in this region. We acquired Pinnacle with a portion of the proceeds from our initial
public offering, which had been invested in short-term investments as of June 30, 2006.
18
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying
unaudited consolidated financial statements and related notes as of June 30, 2006 and for the three
months and six month ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, included elsewhere herein. This discussion
contains forward-looking statements based on our current expectations, assumptions, estimates and
projections about us and the oil and gas industry. These forward-looking statements involve risks
and uncertainties that may be outside of our control. Our actual results could differ materially
from those indicated in these forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to
such differences include, but are not limited to: market prices for oil and gas, the level of oil
and gas drilling, economic and competitive conditions, capital expenditures, regulatory changes and
other uncertainties, as well as those factors discussed in Item 1A of Part II of this quarterly
report. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events
discussed below may not occur. Except to the extent required by law, we undertake no obligation to
update publicly any forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available or other
events occur in the future.
References to Complete, the Company, we, our and similar phrases are used throughout
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and relate collectively to Complete Production Services, Inc.
and its consolidated affiliates.
Overview
We are a leading provider of specialized services and products focused on helping oil and gas
companies develop hydrocarbon reserves, reduce operating costs and enhance production. We focus on
basins within North America that we believe have attractive long-term potential for growth, and we
deliver targeted, value-added services and products required by our customers within each specific
basin. We believe our range of services and products positions us to meet the many needs of our
customers at the wellsite, from drilling and completion through production and eventual
abandonment. We manage our operations from regional field service facilities located throughout the
U.S. Rocky Mountain region, Texas, Oklahoma, Louisiana, Arkansas, Kansas, western Canada, Mexico and Southeast Asia.
On September 12, 2005, we completed the combination (Combination) of Complete Energy
Services, Inc. (CES), Integrated Production Services, Inc. (IPS) and I.E. Miller Services, Inc.
(IEM) pursuant to which the CES and IEM shareholders exchanged all of their common stock for
common stock of IPS. The Combination was accounted for using the continuity of interests method of
accounting, which yields results similar to the pooling of interest method. Subsequent to the
Combination, IPS changed its name to Complete Production Services, Inc.
On April 26, 2006, we completed our initial public offering and our common stock is currently
trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol CPX.
We operate in three business segments:
|
|
|
Completion and Production Services. Our completion and production services segment
includes: (1) intervention services, which require the use of specialized equipment, such
as coiled tubing units, pressure pumping units, nitrogen units, well service rigs and
snubbing units, to perform various wellbore services, (2) downhole and wellsite services,
such as wireline, production optimization, production testing and rental and fishing
services, and (3) fluid handling services that are used to move, store and dispose of
fluids that are involved in the development and production of oil and gas reservoirs. |
|
|
|
|
Drilling Services. Through our drilling services segment, we provide land drilling,
specialized rig logistics and site preparation for oil and gas exploration and production
companies. |
|
|
|
|
Product Sales. Through our product sales segment, we sell oil and gas field equipment,
including completion, flow control and artificial lift equipment, as well as tubular goods. |
19
Substantially all service and rental revenue we earn is based upon a charge for a period of
time (an hour, a day, a week) for the actual period of time the service or rental is provided to
our customer. Product sales are recorded when the actual sale occurs and title or ownership passes
to the customer.
General
The primary factor influencing demand for our services and products is the level of drilling,
completion and maintenance activity of our customers, which in turn, depends on current and
anticipated future oil and gas prices, production depletion rates and the resultant levels of cash
flows generated and allocated by our customers to their drilling, completion and maintenance
budgets. As a result, demand for our services and products is cyclical, substantially depends on
activity levels in the North American oil and gas industry and is highly sensitive to current and
expected oil and natural gas prices. During the first six months of 2006, oil commodity prices
increased due to worldwide demand for energy and other global and domestic economic factors, while
natural gas prices decreased from recent record levels due to short-term oversupply in the market,
but still remained high compared to historical averages. The price of a barrel of crude oil
reached an all-time high in recent months and continues to remain higher in 2006 than for the
comparable period in 2005.
We believe there is a correlation between the number of active drilling rigs and the level of
spending for exploration and development of new and existing hydrocarbon reserves by our customers
in the oil and gas industry. These spending levels are a primary driver of our business, and we
believe that our customers tend to invest more in these activities when oil and gas prices are at
higher levels or are increasing. The average North American rotary rig count, as published by Baker
Hughes Incorporated, is summarized in the following table for the quarter and six months ended June
30, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Operating rig counts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States |
|
|
1,635 |
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
1,578 |
|
|
|
1,311 |
|
Canada |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
Gulf of Mexico |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
90 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total North America |
|
|
2,018 |
|
|
|
1,675 |
|
|
|
2,139 |
|
|
|
1,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We continue to evaluate demand for our services and are currently investing in equipment in
order to place more equipment into service to meet customer demand.
Outlook
Our growth strategy includes a focus on internal growth in our current basins by increasing
current equipment utilization, adding additional like kind equipment and expanding service and
product offerings. In addition, we identify new basins in which to replicate this approach. We also
augment our internal growth through strategic acquisitions.
We use strategic acquisitions as an integral part of our growth strategy. We consider
acquisitions that will add to our service offerings in a current operating area or that will expand
our geographical footprint into a targeted basin. We invested $36.5 million to acquire three
companies during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and an additional $107.0 million to acquire
four other companies in July 2006 (see Acquisitions).
During the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006, we invested $73.5 million and $132.4
million, respectively, in equipment additions and other capital expenditures. We increased our
capital expenditures budget for 2006 by $30.0 million to a total of approximately $230.0 million to
purchase additional equipment in an effort to meet customer demand for our services and products.
For the twelve months ended June 30, 2006, our capital expenditures have exceeded $217.0 million,
the majority of which related to growth capital. Due to the timing of project completion and the
logistics associated with placing equipment into service, we do not believe our operating results
as of June 30, 2006 reflect the full benefit of this growth capital investment. We do expect to
see this benefit in future quarters, reflected as revenue growth throughout 2006 and beyond
associated with this and future capital investments. Our future results remain subject, however,
to the risks described in our 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2006.
20
We expect to continue to invest in equipment and to evaluate complementary acquisition
targets. We believe North American oilfield activity levels will remain high, especially in the
Rocky Mountain region, Barnett Shale of north Texas, Anadarko basin in the Mid-continent region,
and Fayetteville Shale in Arkansas (a new basin we entered in late 2005 with the strategic
acquisition of Big Mac). The outlook for 2006 remains positive from an activity and pricing
perspective. Consistent with the prior year, we experienced a slight decline in sales in Canada,
and, to a lesser extent, in the Rocky Mountain region during the second quarter of 2006, when
compared to the first quarter of the year, due to seasonality as weather conditions make it
difficult to conduct oil and gas field service operations in these regions during this time of the
year.
Acquisitions
During the first quarter of 2006, we acquired the operating assets of Outpost Office Inc., an
oilfield equipment rental company in Grand Junction, Colorado (Outpost), for $6.5 million in
cash, as well as the equity interests of The Rosel Company, a cased-hole and open-hole
electric-line business based in Liberal, Kansas (Rosel), for approximately $12.0 million in cash,
net of cash acquired and debt assumed. Since March 31, 2006, we acquired several complementary
businesses, which are described below.
On June 30, 2006, we acquired certain operating assets of J&M Rental Tool, Inc dba Arkoma
Machine & Fishing Tools, Arkoma Machine Shop, Inc. and N&M Supply, LLC, collectively referred to as
Arkoma, a provider of rental tools, machining and fishing services in the Fayetteville Shale and
Arkoma Basin, located in Ft. Smith, Arkansas. We paid $18.0 million to acquire Arkoma, subject to
a final working capital adjustment, and recorded goodwill totaling $9.3 million, which has been
allocated entirely to the completion and production services business segment. We believe this
acquisition provides a platform to further expand our presence in the Fayetteville Shale and Arkoma
Basin and supplement our completion and production services business in that region.
On July 17, 2006, we acquired all the assets of CHB Holdings Partnership, Ltd. (CHB), a
fluid handling and disposal services business located in Henderson, Texas, for $12.7 million in
cash. The purchase price allocation related to this acquisition has not yet been finalized. We
will include the accounts of CHB in our completion and production services business segment from
the date of acquisition. We believe this acquisition is complementary to our fluid handling
business in the Bossier Trend region of east Texas. We acquired CHB with a portion of the proceeds
from our initial public offering, which had been invested in short-term investments as of June 30,
2006.
On July 28, 2006, we acquired all of the outstanding equity interests of the Turner group of
companies (Turner Energy Services, LLC, Turner Energy SWD, LLC, T. & J. Energy, LLC, T. & J. SWD,
LLC and Loyd Jones Well Service, LLC) for $53.8 million in cash subject to a final working capital adjustment.
The Turner group of companies
(Turner) is based in the Texas panhandle in Canadian, Texas, and owns a fleet of well service
rigs, and provides other wellsite services such as fishing, equipment rental, fluid handling and
salt water disposal services. The purchase price allocation related to this acquisition has not
yet been finalized. We will include the accounts of Turner in our completion and production
services business segment from the date of acquisition. We believe this acquisition will
supplement our completion and production services business in the Mid-continent region. We
acquired Turner with a portion of the proceeds from our initial public offering, which had been
invested in short-term investments as of June 30, 2006.
On July 31, 2006, we acquired certain assets of Quinn Well Control Ltd. (Quinn), a slickline
business located in Grande Prairie, Alberta, Canada, for $8.9 million in cash. The purchase price
allocation related to this acquisition has not yet been finalized. We will include the accounts of
Quinn in our completion and production services business segment from the date of acquisition. We
believe this acquisition will enhance our Canadian slick-line business and expand our geographic
reach in northern Alberta and northeast British Columbia. We acquired Quinn with a portion of the
proceeds from our initial public offering, which had been invested in short-term investments as of
June 30, 2006.
On August 1, 2006, we acquired substantially all of the assets of Pinnacle Drilling Co.,
L.L.C. (Pinnacle), a drilling company located in Tolar, Texas, for $31.6 million in cash.
Pinnacle operates three drilling rigs, two in the Barnett Shale region of north Texas and one in
east Texas. The purchase price allocation for Pinnacle has not yet been finalized. We will
include the accounts of Pinnacle in our drilling services business segment from the date of
acquisition. We believe this acquisition will increase our
21
presence in the Barnett Shale of north Texas and the Bossier Trend of east Texas and expand
our capacity to drill deep and horizontal wells, which are sought by our customers in this region.
We acquired Pinnacle with a portion of the proceeds from our initial public offering, which had
been invested in short-term investments as of June 30, 2006.
We account for these acquisitions using the purchase method of accounting, whereby the
purchase price is allocated to the fair value of net assets acquired, including intangibles and
property, plant and equipment at depreciated replacement costs with the excess to goodwill.
Results of operations related to each acquired company will be included in our combined operations
and accounts as of the date of acquisition.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our combined financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the use
of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amount of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on
historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the
circumstances, and provide a basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and
liabilities that are not readily available through open market quotes. Estimates and assumptions
are reviewed periodically, and actual results may differ from those estimates under different
assumptions or conditions. We must use our judgment related to uncertainties in order to make these
estimates and assumptions.
For a description of our critical accounting policies and estimates as well as certain
sensitivity disclosures related to those estimates, see our prospectus filed on April 20, 2006
pursuant to Rule 424(b) of the Securities Act of 1933. Our critical accounting policies and
estimates have not changed materially during the six months ended June 30, 2006, except that we
adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123R on January 1, 2006, which
impacted our accounting treatment of employee stock options. See further discussion in our
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as of March 31, 2006.
Results of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Quarter |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
2006/ |
|
|
2006/ |
|
|
|
6/30/06 |
|
|
6/30/05 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion and production services |
|
$ |
183,270 |
|
|
$ |
112,866 |
|
|
$ |
70,404 |
|
|
|
62 |
% |
Drilling services |
|
|
51,150 |
|
|
|
28,762 |
|
|
|
22,388 |
|
|
|
78 |
% |
Product sales |
|
|
41,006 |
|
|
|
27,011 |
|
|
|
13,995 |
|
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
275,426 |
|
|
$ |
168,639 |
|
|
$ |
106,787 |
|
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion and production services |
|
$ |
49,091 |
|
|
$ |
23,739 |
|
|
$ |
25,352 |
|
|
|
107 |
% |
Drilling services |
|
|
18,236 |
|
|
|
8,647 |
|
|
|
9,589 |
|
|
|
111 |
% |
Product sales |
|
|
5,188 |
|
|
|
3,516 |
|
|
|
1,672 |
|
|
|
48 |
% |
Corporate |
|
|
(3,988 |
) |
|
|
(1,127 |
) |
|
|
(2,861 |
) |
|
|
254 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
68,527 |
|
|
$ |
34,775 |
|
|
$ |
33,752 |
|
|
|
97 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent |
|
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
2006/ |
|
|
2006/ |
|
|
|
6/30/06 |
|
|
6/30/05 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion and production services |
|
$ |
374,359 |
|
|
$ |
218,259 |
|
|
$ |
156,100 |
|
|
|
72 |
% |
Drilling services |
|
|
95,180 |
|
|
|
55,356 |
|
|
|
39,824 |
|
|
|
72 |
% |
Product sales |
|
|
81,623 |
|
|
|
56,275 |
|
|
|
25,348 |
|
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
551,162 |
|
|
$ |
329,890 |
|
|
$ |
221,272 |
|
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion and production services |
|
$ |
103,701 |
|
|
$ |
49,848 |
|
|
$ |
53,853 |
|
|
|
108 |
% |
Drilling services |
|
|
34,256 |
|
|
|
16,519 |
|
|
|
17,737 |
|
|
|
107 |
% |
Product sales |
|
|
10,734 |
|
|
|
7,453 |
|
|
|
3,281 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
Corporate |
|
|
(7,927 |
) |
|
|
(1,933 |
) |
|
|
(5,994 |
) |
|
|
310 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
140,764 |
|
|
$ |
71,887 |
|
|
$ |
68,877 |
|
|
|
96 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
Corporate includes amounts related to corporate personnel costs and other general expenses.
EBITDA consists of net income (loss) before interest expense, taxes, depreciation and
amortization and minority interest. EBITDA is a non-cash measure of performance. We use EBITDA as
the primary internal management measure for evaluating performance and allocating additional
resources. The following table reconciles EBITDA for the quarters and six months ended June 30,
2006 and 2005 to the most comparable GAAP measure, operating income (loss).
Reconciliation of EBITDA to Most Comparable GAAP MeasureOperating Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
|
Drilling |
|
|
Product |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
Quarter Ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA, as defined |
|
$ |
49,091 |
|
|
$ |
18,236 |
|
|
$ |
5,188 |
|
|
$ |
(3,988 |
) |
|
$ |
68,527 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
14,001 |
|
|
$ |
2,284 |
|
|
$ |
575 |
|
|
$ |
265 |
|
|
$ |
17,125 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
35,090 |
|
|
$ |
15,952 |
|
|
$ |
4,613 |
|
|
$ |
(4,253 |
) |
|
$ |
51,402 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA, as defined |
|
$ |
23,739 |
|
|
$ |
8,647 |
|
|
$ |
3,516 |
|
|
$ |
(1,127 |
) |
|
$ |
34,775 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
8,634 |
|
|
$ |
1,322 |
|
|
$ |
369 |
|
|
$ |
479 |
|
|
$ |
10,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
15,105 |
|
|
$ |
7,325 |
|
|
$ |
3,147 |
|
|
$ |
(1,606 |
) |
|
$ |
23,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production |
|
|
Drilling |
|
|
Product |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Services |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Sales |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA, as defined |
|
$ |
103,701 |
|
|
$ |
34,256 |
|
|
$ |
10,734 |
|
|
$ |
(7,927 |
) |
|
$ |
140,764 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
26,835 |
|
|
$ |
4,302 |
|
|
$ |
1,078 |
|
|
$ |
637 |
|
|
$ |
32,852 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
76,866 |
|
|
$ |
29,954 |
|
|
$ |
9,656 |
|
|
$ |
(8,564 |
) |
|
$ |
107,912 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EBITDA, as defined |
|
$ |
49,848 |
|
|
$ |
16,519 |
|
|
$ |
7,453 |
|
|
$ |
(1,933 |
) |
|
$ |
71,887 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
$ |
16,750 |
|
|
$ |
2,537 |
|
|
$ |
745 |
|
|
$ |
546 |
|
|
$ |
20,578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
$ |
33,098 |
|
|
$ |
13,982 |
|
|
$ |
6,708 |
|
|
$ |
(2,479 |
) |
|
$ |
51,309 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our revenue and EBITDA results for the indicated periods generally increased due to the
contribution of companies acquired and an increase in oilfield activity in North America as a
result of higher commodity prices throughout the applicable periods.
Below is a more detailed discussion of our operating results by segment for these periods.
Quarter and Six Months Ended June 30, 2006 Compared to the Quarter and Six Months Ended June 30, 2005 (Unaudited)
Revenue
Revenue for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 increased by 63%, or $106.8 million, to $275.4
million from $168.6 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. For the six months ended June 30,
2006 compared to the respective period in 2005, revenue increased by 67%, or $221.3 million, to
$551.2 million from $329.9 million. These increases by segment were as follows:
|
|
|
Completion and Production Services. Segment revenue increased $70.4 million for the
quarter and $156.1 million for the six months resulting primarily from: (1) strong activity
levels; (2) investment in acquisitions during the second half of 2005 including the
acquisitions of the equity interests of Roustabout Specialties, Inc. and the Big Mac group
of companies (Big Mac Transports, LLC, Big Mac Tank Trucks, LLC and Fugo Service, LLC)
(Big Mac) and the acquisition of the assets of Wolsey Well Services, Inc., and the
acquisitions of the assets of Outpost and the equity interests of Rosel during January
2006, each of which provided incremental revenues for 2006 compared to |
23
|
|
|
2005; (3) an increase in revenues earned as a result of additional capital investment in the
coiled tubing, well servicing, rental and fluid-handling businesses; and (4) an improved
pricing environment for our services and products. |
|
|
|
|
Drilling Services. Segment revenue increased $22.4 million for the quarter and $39.8
million for the six months, primarily due to: (1) higher utilization of our drilling
equipment; (2) more favorable pricing; (3) continued capital investment in our Barnett
Shale-focused drilling business during the first half of 2006; and (4) investment in
drilling logistics equipment used throughout our service areas. |
|
|
|
|
Product Sales. Segment revenue increased $14.0 million for the quarter and $25.3
million for the six months, fueled by an incremental increase in supply store sales as a
result of the acquisition of two new supply stores in late 2005, and the opening of several
other supply stores during 2005, as well as increased product sales in Southeast Asia.
During the second quarter of 2006, we introduced tubular equipment, a new product line
offered by our supply stores, which has contributed to increased sales in 2006 compared to
2005. |
Our operating results also reflect seasonality in Canada and, to a lesser extent, in the Rocky
Mountain region of the United States, associated with weather conditions that typically make oil
and gas operations in these areas difficult during the second quarter of the year.
Service and Product Expenses
Service and product expenses include labor costs associated with the execution and support of
our services, materials used in the performance of those services and other costs directly related
to the support and maintenance of equipment. These expenses increased 58%, or $62.5 million, to
$170.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 from $107.7 million for the quarter ended June
30, 2005. For the six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, the increase was 60%, or $126.2
million. The following table summarizes service and product expenses as a percentage of revenues
for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service and Product Expense as a Percentage of Revenue |
|
|
Quarter Ended |
|
Six Months Ended |
|
Change |
|
|
6/30/06 |
|
6/30/05 |
|
6/30/06 |
|
6/30/05 |
|
Quarter |
|
Six Months |
Segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion and
Production services |
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
60 |
% |
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
|
(2 |
%) |
Drilling services |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
(3 |
%) |
|
|
(3 |
%) |
Product sales |
|
|
76 |
% |
|
|
75 |
% |
|
|
76 |
% |
|
|
76 |
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
61 |
% |
|
|
64 |
% |
|
|
(2 |
%) |
|
|
(3 |
%) |
The decline in service and product expenses as a percentage of revenue reflects improved
margins as a result of: (1) a favorable mix of services and products, (2) improved pricing for our
services, as more revenue was earned in 2006 from higher margin services in the United States and
(3) a general increase in customer demand for oil and gas services and products throughout 2005 and
the first half of 2006. We were able to obtain more favorable pricing for our drilling services
business segment compared to the other two segments for these periods as a result of higher
customer demand for drilling services primarily in the Barnett Shale region of north Texas.
Margins associated with our products business declined slightly during the second quarter of 2006
compared to the respective period in 2005, due primarily to the product mix and costs associated
with opening new supply stores.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses include salaries and other related expenses for
our selling, administrative, finance, information technology and human resource functions. Selling,
general and administrative expenses increased 40%, or $10.5 million, for the quarter ended June 30,
2006 to $36.6 million from $26.1 million during the quarter ended June 30, 2005. For the six months
ended June 30, 2006, selling, general and administrative expenses increased 55%, or $26.2 million
compared to the same period in 2005. These expense increases were primarily due to acquisitions,
which provided additional
24
headcount, property rental expense, insurance expense and other administrative costs. In
addition, as a result of the Combination, we employed additional senior officers and key members of
management at our corporate office, incurred consulting costs associated with information
technology and Sarbanes-Oxley projects, incurred additional outside accounting and tax consulting
fees associated with audits of subsidiaries and tax compliance, recorded incremental costs of
approximately $1.0 million related to amortization of non-vested restricted stock and incurred
approximately $0.5 million of expense associated with employee stock options as a result of the
adoption of SFAS No. 123R on January 1, 2006. As a percentage of revenues, selling, general and
administrative expense declined to 13% for the six months ended June 30, 2006 compared to 15% for
the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expense increased 59%, or $6.3 million to $17.1 million for the
quarter ended June 30, 2006 from $10.8 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2005. For the six
months ended June 30, 2006, depreciation and amortization expense increased 60%, or $12.3 million
compared to the same period in 2005. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense was the
result of placing into service equipment that was purchased after July 1, 2005 and prior to June
30, 2006. During this twelve-month period, we purchased assets totaling approximately $217.0
million. In addition, we recorded depreciation and amortization expense totaling $3.5 million
during the six months ended June 30, 2006 associated with business acquired after June 30, 2005.
As a percentage of revenue, depreciation and amortization expense was 6% for the quarters and
six-month periods ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $9.5 million and $5.6 million for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and
2005, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, interest expense was $20.2 million
compared to $9.6 million for the same period in 2005. The increase in interest expense was
attributable to an increase in the average amount of debt outstanding, as we entered into a credit
facility in association with the Combination, which included borrowings of approximately $146.9
million to fund a dividend to stockholders of record after the closing of the Combination on
September 12, 2005. Additional borrowings under our debt facilities were used to fund acquisitions
and for investment in capital expenditures. The weighted-average interest rate of borrowings
outstanding at June 30, 2006 and 2005 was approximately 7.6% and 6.5%, respectively. The increase
in the borrowing rate was due to higher borrowings under variable interest rate facilities and a
general increase in LIBOR and the U.S. prime interest rate throughout 2005 and into 2006.
Interest Income
Interest income was $1.0 million for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006. This
interest income was earned on cash invested in short-term municipal bond funds and similar
investments. The cash was received as a portion of the net proceeds from our initial public
offering in April 2006. The balance of these short-term investments at June 30, 2006 was
approximately $112.2 million.
Taxes
Tax expense is comprised of current income taxes and deferred income taxes. The current and
deferred taxes added together provide an indication of an effective rate of income tax.
Tax expense was 37.1% and 36.0% of pretax income for the quarters ended June 30, 2006 and
2005, respectively, and 37.6% and 35.9% of pretax income for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and
2005, respectively. The increase in the effective tax rate in 2006 reflects the composition of
earnings in domestic versus foreign tax jurisdictions, the effect of state and provincial income
taxes and the timing of the use of net operating loss carry forwards, primarily in 2005. The
effective rates for 2006 also reflect the benefit derived from tax-free and tax-advantaged interest
income received during the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006.
Minority Interest
The results of operations for the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2005 reflect the
minority
25
ownership interest in CES and IEM held by parties other than the majority stockholder of the
pre-Combination entities. See discussion of the Combination at Overview. This minority interest
was acquired by us during the Combination on September 12, 2005.
For the quarter and six months ended June 30, 2006, minority interest represents an ownership
interest by an unrelated third party in the assets of Premier Integrated Technologies, Inc.
(Premier), a company that we acquired on January 1, 2005. We have consolidated Premier in our
accounts since the date of acquisition and record minority interest to reflect the ownership held
by this third party.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary liquidity needs are to fund capital expenditures, such as expanding our coiled
tubing, wireline and production testing fleets, building new drilling rigs, increasing and
replacing rental tool and well service rigs and snubbing units, and funding general working capital
needs. In addition, we need capital to fund strategic business acquisitions. Our primary sources of
funds have historically been cash flow from operations, proceeds from borrowings under bank credit
facilities and the issuance of equity securities, primarily associated with acquisitions.
On April 26, 2006, we sold 13,000,000 shares of our $.01 par value common stock in an initial
public offering at an initial offering price to the public of $24.00 per share, which provided
proceeds of approximately $292.5 million less underwriters fees. We used these funds to retire
principal and interest outstanding under our U.S. revolving credit facility on April 28, 2006
totaling approximately $127.5 million, to pay transaction costs of approximately $3.4 million and
invested the remaining funds in tax-free and tax-advantaged municipal bonds and similar financial
instruments. Of this amount, we utilized $116.3 million to acquire Arkoma, CHB, Turner and
Pinnacle. The remaining proceeds from our initial public offering were $13.9 million as of August
2, 2006.
We anticipate that we will rely on cash generated from operations, proceeds from our initial
public offering, borrowings under our revolving credit facility, future debt offerings and/or
future public equity offerings to satisfy our liquidity needs. We believe that funds from these
sources should be sufficient to meet both our short-term working capital requirements and our
long-term capital requirements. We believe that our operating cash flows, remaining proceeds from
our initial public offering and availability under our revolving credit facility will be sufficient
to fund our operations for the next twelve months. Our ability to fund planned capital
expenditures and to make acquisitions will depend upon our future operating performance, and more
broadly, on the availability of equity and debt financing, which will be affected by prevailing
economic conditions in our industry, and general financial, business and other factors, some of
which are beyond our control.
The following table summarizes cash flows by type for the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Cash flows provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
73,440 |
|
|
$ |
34,365 |
|
Financing activities |
|
|
203,612 |
|
|
|
22,119 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(277,513 |
) |
|
|
(52,677 |
) |
Net cash provided by operating activities increased $39.1 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005. This increase was primarily due to an
increase in gross receipts as a result of increased revenues. Our gross receipts increased
throughout 2005 and into the first half of 2006 as demand for our services grew, resulting in more
billable hours and more favorable billing rates, while we continued to expand our current business
and enter new markets through acquisitions (Fayetteville Shale entry in late 2005 and supplemented
by the acquisition of Arkoma on June 30, 2006) and capital investment. We expect to continue to
evaluate acquisition opportunities for the foreseeable future, and expect that new acquisitions
will provide incremental operating cash flows.
Net cash provided by financing activities increased $181.5 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005. The primary source of funds from
financing activities was the receipt of net proceeds from our initial public offering in April
2006, which provided
26
approximately $289.2 million. In addition, we borrowed approximately $18.4 million to fund
the acquisitions of Outpost and Rosel in January 2006. The primary use of funds from financing
activities was to repay $127.5 million outstanding under our U.S. revolving credit facility as of
April 2006. For the first half of 2005, we refinanced our term loan and revolving credit
facilities, borrowed $9.8 million to acquire Parchman and borrowed additional funds for general
corporate purposes. In addition, we received $10.5 million from our primary stockholder. Our
long-term debt balances, including current maturities, were $440.8 million and $270.5 million at
June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Net cash used in investing activities increased by $224.8 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2006 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2005, reflecting an incremental increase in
funds used for acquisitions and capital expenditures in 2006 of $26.3 million and $89.7 million,
respectively. In addition, we invested $165.0 million in short-term investments, of which we sold
$52.8 million and used the proceeds to acquire Arkoma for $18.0 million, to make scheduled
principal and interest payments on our Credit Facility, to pay estimated federal income taxes and
for other general corporate purposes. Significant capital equipment expenditures in 2006 included
drilling rigs, well services rigs, fluid-handling equipment, rental equipment and coiled tubing
equipment.
Dividends
We do not intend to pay dividends in the foreseeable future, but rather plan to reinvest such
funds in our business. Furthermore, our current term loan and revolving debt facility, as amended
on March 29, 2006, contains restrictive debt covenants which preclude us from paying future
dividends on our common stock.
Description of Our Indebtedness
On March 29, 2006, we amended and restated our existing senior secured credit facility (the
Credit Agreement) with Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as U.S. Administrative Agent, and
certain other financial institutions. The Credit Agreement provides for a $170.0 million U.S.
revolving credit facility that will mature in 2010, a $30.0 million Canadian revolving credit
facility (with Integrated Production Services, Ltd., one of our subsidiaries, as the borrower
thereunder) that will mature in 2010 and a $419.0 million term loan credit facility that will
mature in 2012. Subject to certain limitations, we have the ability to increase the aggregate
commitment under the amended Credit Agreement by a total of up to $150.0 million upon receiving
commitments from one or more of our lenders totaling the amount of the increase, and/or decrease or
reallocate the commitments under the various aforementioned credit facilities. In addition,
certain portions of the credit facilities are available to be borrowed in U.S. Dollars, Canadian
Dollars, Pounds Sterling, Euros and other currencies approved by the lenders.
Subject to certain limitations, we have the ability to elect how interest under the Credit
Agreement will be computed. Interest under the Credit Agreement may be determined by reference to
(1) the London Inter-bank Offered Rate, or LIBOR, plus an applicable margin between 1.25% and 2.75%
per annum (with the applicable margin depending upon our ratio of total debt to EBITDA (as defined
in the agreement)) for revolving advances and 2.5% for term advances, or (2) the Canadian Base Rate
(i.e., the higher of the Canadian banks prime rate or the CDOR rate plus 1.0%), in the case of
Canadian loans or the greater of the prime rate and the federal funds rate plus 0.5%, in the case
of U.S. loans, plus an applicable margin between 0.25% and 1.75% per annum for revolving advances
and 1.5% for term advances. If an event of default exists under the Credit Agreement, advances will
bear interest at the then-applicable rate plus 2%. Interest is payable quarterly for base rate
loans and at the end of applicable interest periods for LIBOR loans, except that if the interest
period for a LIBOR loan is six months, interest will be paid at the end of each three-month period.
The Credit Agreement also contains various covenants that limit our and our subsidiaries
ability to: (1) grant certain liens; (2) make certain loans and investments; (3) make capital
expenditures; (4) make distributions; (5) make acquisitions; (6) enter into hedging transactions;
(7) merge or consolidate; or (8) engage in certain asset dispositions. These covenants require us
and our subsidiaries, on a consolidated basis, to maintain specified ratios or conditions including
requirements of: (a) total debt to EBITDA, as defined, (b) total senior secured debt to EBITDA, as
defined; (c) EBITDA, as defined, to total interest expense; and (d) other conditions as specified
in the agreement. We were in compliance with all debt covenants under the amended Credit Facility
as of June 30, 2006.
27
Concurrently with the completion of the Combination, we borrowed approximately $450.0 million
under the Credit Agreement as of the closing of the Combination to: (i) finance the Combination
(including the payment of the Dividend) and (ii) repay in full indebtedness outstanding under our
previous credit agreements. Future borrowings under the revolving credit facilities under the
Credit Agreement are available for working capital and general corporate purposes. The revolving
facilities under the Credit Agreement may be drawn on and repaid without restriction so long as we
are in compliance with the terms of the Credit Agreement, including certain financial covenants,
but the term credit facility under the Credit Agreement may not be reborrowed once repaid. The
Credit Agreement provides for repayment of the principal of the term facility in quarterly
installments of $1.1 million and payable on each March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31,
commencing March 31, 2006. The required principal payment of $1.1 million was made as of June 30,
2006.
All of the obligations under the U.S. portion of the Credit Agreement are secured by first
priority liens on substantially all of the assets of our U.S. subsidiaries as well as a pledge of
approximately 66% of the stock of our first-tier foreign subsidiaries. Additionally, all of the
obligations under the U.S. portion of the Credit Agreement are guaranteed by substantially all of
our U.S. subsidiaries. All of the obligations under the Canadian portions of the Credit Agreement
are secured by first priority liens on substantially all of the assets of our subsidiaries.
Additionally, all of the obligations under the Canadian portions of the Credit Agreement are
guaranteed by us as well as certain of our subsidiaries.
If an event of default exists under the Credit Agreement, the lenders may accelerate the
maturity of the obligations outstanding under the Credit Agreement and exercise other rights and
remedies. While an event of default is continuing, advances will bear interest at the
then-applicable rate plus 2%.
Borrowings outstanding under the term loan portion of the amended Credit Facility bore
interest at 7.66% at June 30, 2006, while borrowings under the Canadian revolving credit facility
bore interest at a rate of 7.25%. No borrowings were outstanding under the U.S. revolving credit
portion of this facility at June 30, 2006. For the six months ended June 30, 2006, the weighted
average interest rate on borrowings under the amended Credit Facility was approximately 7.63%. In
addition, there were letters of credit outstanding which totaled $10.3 million under the U.S.
revolving portion of the facility that reduced the available borrowing capacity at June 30, 2006,
and we incurred fees of 2.25% of the total amount outstanding under these letter of credit
arrangements.
In accordance with the subordinated notes issued in conjunction with the acquisition of
Parchman Energy Group Inc. (Parchman) in February 2005, all principal and interest under these
note arrangements totaling $5.0 million was repaid as of May 2, 2006.
Other Arrangements
We received $7.4 million from customers in 2005 as advance payments on the construction and
operation of two drilling rigs for our contract drilling operations in north Texas. The drilling
rigs were completed and placed into service in October 2005 and January 2006. Revenue is being
recognized over the agreed service contract. The unearned revenue related to these contracts at
June 30, 2006 totaled $2.7 million and has been recorded as a liability on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet. We expect to recognize all revenues under these contracts prior to
December 31, 2006. Revenue will only be recorded as it is earned.
We paid $5.8 million in May 2006 related to certain earn-out commitments associated with
acquisitions completed in 2004 and 2005. This amount was accrued as of December 31, 2005, with an
offsetting increase in goodwill at that time. In the second quarter of 2006, we paid an additional
$0.3 million related to an earn-out agreement for a 2004 acquisition, and recorded this payment as
an increase in goodwill as of June 30, 2006. These payments represent final settlement of our
commitments under these earn-out arrangements.
Outstanding Debt and Commitments
Our contractual commitments have not changed materially since December 31, 2005, except for
additional borrowings under our U.S. revolving credit facility to fund acquisitions and capital
expenditures prior to April 28, 2006, at which time all amounts outstanding under the U.S.
revolving credit portion of the facility was repaid with proceeds from our initial public offering.
28
We have entered into agreements to purchase certain oil and gas equipment for use in our
business. The manufacture of this equipment requires lead-time and we generally are committed to
accept this equipment at the time of delivery, unless arrangements have been made to cancel
delivery in accordance with the purchase agreement terms. We expect to spend approximately $230.0
million for capital expenditures in 2006, of which $132.4 million has been incurred during the six
months ended June 30, 2006.
We expect to continue to acquire complementary companies and evaluate potential acquisition
targets. We may use cash from operations, the remaining proceeds from our initial public offering
and borrowings under our revolving credit facility for this purpose.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2006, the FASB issued an interpretation entitled Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxesan interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, referred to as FIN 48. FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertain tax positions that may have been taken by an entity. Specifically, FIN 48
prescribes a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold to measure a tax position taken or expected
to be taken in a tax return through a two-step process: (1) determining whether it is more likely
than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination by taxing authorities, after all
appeals, based upon the technical merits of the position; and (2) measuring to determine the amount
of benefit/expense to recognize in the financial statements, assuming taxing authorities have all
relevant information concerning the issue. The tax position is measured at the largest amount of
benefit/expense that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
This pronouncement also specifies how to present a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in a
classified balance sheet, but does not change the classification requirements for deferred taxes.
Under FIN 48, if a tax position previously failed the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold,
it should be recognized in the first subsequent financial reporting period in which the threshold
is met. Similarly, a position that no longer meets this recognition threshold, should be
derecognized in the first financial reporting period that the threshold is no longer met. FIN 48
becomes effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006, with earlier adoption
encouraged. We are currently evaluating the effect this pronouncement may have on our financial
position, results of operations and cash flows.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
The demand, pricing and terms for oil and gas services provided by us are largely dependent
upon the level of activity for the U.S. and Canadian gas industry. Industry conditions are
influenced by numerous factors over which we have no control, including, but not limited to: the
supply of and demand for oil and gas; the level of prices, and expectations about future prices, of
oil and gas; the cost of exploring for, developing, producing and delivering oil and gas; the
expected rates of declining current production; the discovery rates of new oil and gas reserves;
available pipeline and other transportation capacity; weather conditions; domestic and worldwide
economic conditions; political instability in oil-producing countries; technical advances affecting
energy consumption; the price and availability of alternative fuels; the ability of oil and gas
producers to raise equity capital and debt financing; and merger and divestiture activity among oil
and gas producers.
The level of activity in the U.S. and Canadian oil and gas exploration and production industry
is volatile. No assurance can be given that expected trends in oil and gas production activities
will continue or that demand for our services will reflect the level of activity in the industry.
Any prolonged substantial reduction in oil and gas prices would likely affect oil and gas
production levels and therefore affect demand for our services. A material decline in oil and gas
prices or U.S. and Canadian activity levels could have a material adverse effect on our business,
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006, approximately 10% of our revenues and 11% of our total
assets were denominated in Canadian dollars, our functional currency in Canada. As a result, a
material decrease in the value of the Canadian dollar relative to the U.S. dollar may negatively
impact our revenues, cash flows and net income. Each one percentage point change in the value of
the Canadian dollar would have impacted our revenues for the quarter and six months ended June 30,
2006 by approximately $0.3 million and $0.7 million, respectively. We do not currently use hedges
or forward contracts to offset this risk.
29
Our Mexican operation uses the U.S. dollar as its functional currency, and as a result, all
transactions and translation gains and losses are recorded currently in the financial statements.
The balance sheet amounts are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate at the end of the
month and the income statement amounts are translated at the average exchange rate for the month.
We estimate that a hypothetical one percentage point change in the value of the Mexican peso
relative to the U.S. dollar would have impacted our revenues for the quarter and six months ended
June 30, 2006 by approximately $0.1 million. Currently, we conduct a portion of our business in
Mexico in the local currency, the Mexican peso.
All of our bank debt is structured under floating rate terms and, as such, our interest
expense is sensitive to fluctuations in the prime rates in the U.S. and Canada. Based on the debt
structure in place as of June 30, 2006, a 100 basis point increase in interest rates would increase
interest expense by approximately $4.4 million per year and reduce operating cash flows by
approximately $2.8 million.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and President and our Chief Financial Officer, of
the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a 15 under the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report.
Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and President and our Chief Financial
Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2006, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective,
in all material respects, with respect to the recording, processing, summarizing and reporting,
within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, for information required to be
disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act.
We have been taking steps to comply with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 prior to its applicability to us. In that connection, we have made and expect to
continue to make changes to our internal controls and control environment. Although these changes
have improved and may continue to improve our internal controls and control environment, there were
no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent
fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
PART IIOTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
We operate in a dangerous environment. In the normal course of our business, we are party to
various pending or threatened claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings seeking damages or
other remedies concerning our commercial operations, products, employees and other matters,
including warranty and product liability claims and occasional claims by individuals alleging
exposure to hazardous materials, on the job injuries and fatalities as a result of our products or
operations. Many of the claims filed against us relate to motor vehicle accidents which can result
in the loss of life or serious bodily injury. Some of these claims relate to matters occurring
prior to our acquisition of businesses. In certain cases, we are entitled to indemnification from
the sellers of businesses.
Although we cannot know the outcome of pending legal proceedings and the effect such outcomes
may have on us, we believe that any ultimate liability resulting from the outcome of such
proceedings, to the extent not otherwise provided for or covered by insurance, will not have a
material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
There have been no material changes to our risk factors disclosed in our Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q as of March 31, 2006.
30
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
During April 2006, we issued 3,272 shares of our common stock to a former employee of Parchman
related to unvested restricted stock upon termination.
The Compensation
Committee of our Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 64,800 non-vested restricted shares to our officers and employees
on April 20, 2006. We granted 64,800 non-vested
restricted shares on April 20, 2006 to officers and employees at fair value on the date of grant,
or $24.00 per share. We also issued an aggregate of 16,672 non-vested restricted shares on
April 20, 2006 to directors at $24.00 per share. These non-vested restricted share grants are subject to forfeiture restrictions over the
related vesting terms.
The issuances of these shares to the former Parchman employee and the option and non-vested
restricted stock grants under our long-term incentive plan were made pursuant to the exemption
available under Regulation D, or Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933.
On April 26, 2006, we completed our initial public offering of our common stock pursuant to
our registration statement on Form S-1 (File 333-128750) declared effective by the Securities and
Exchange Commission on April 20, 2006 and our registration statement on Form S-1 (File 333-133446)
which also became effective on April 20, 2006. The underwriters for the offering were Credit
Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, UBS Securities LLC, Banc of America Securities LLC, Jefferies and
Company, Inc., Johnson Rice & Company, L.L.C., Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Simmons & Company
International and Pickering Energy Partners, Inc. Pursuant to the registration statements, we
registered the offer and sale of 29,900,000 shares of our $.01 par value common stock which
included 13,000,000 shares sold by certain selling stockholders and an additional 3,900,000 shares
subject to an option granted to the underwriters to purchase additional shares from such selling
stockholders to cover over-allotments. The underwriters exercised their over-allotment option on
April 24, 2006. The sale of the shares in our initial public offering, including the sale of
shares by the selling stockholders as well as the exercise of the over-allotment option, closed on
April 26, 2006. Our initial public offering terminated upon completion of the closing.
The gross proceeds of our initial public offering based on the public offering price of $24.00
per share were approximately $312.0 million. The net proceeds to us were $289.1 million after
deducting underwriter discounts and commissions of approximately $19.5 million and other expenses
related to the offering of approximately $3.4 million. We also paid for legal fees incurred by the
selling stockholders. Other than for such fees, no fees or expenses have been paid, directly or
indirectly, to any officer, director or 10% stockholder or other affiliate. The proceeds received
from our initial public offering were used to retire outstanding borrowings and accrued interest
under our U.S. revolving credit facility on April 28, 2006 totaling $127.5 million. The remaining
proceeds, totaling approximately $165.0 million, were invested in tax-free municipal bonds and
financial instruments. Of these funds, we used $52.8 million during the second quarter of 2006 to
fund: (1) scheduled principal and interest payments under the Credit Facility, (2) $18.0 million to
acquire Arkoma on June 30, 2006, (3) a quarterly estimated federal income tax payment, and (4)
general corporate purposes. Through August 2, 2006, we utilized an additional $98.3 million of
these funds to acquire CHB, Turner and Pinnacle. Remaining proceeds from our initial public
offering at August 2, 2006 was $13.9 million.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
31
Item 5. Other Information.
Increase in Executive Salaries.
The Compensation Committee of our Board of Directors reviewed a market study of compensation
practices of peer positions in the oilfield services and general industry prepared by its external
executive compensation consultant. Based on the consultants analysis and recommendations, the
Compensation Committee approved the following base salary increases, effective April 22, 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Former Base |
|
New Base |
Employee |
|
Title |
|
Salary |
|
Salary |
Joseph C. Winkler
|
|
President and Chief
Executive Officer
|
|
$ |
400,000 |
|
|
$ |
520,000 |
|
J. Michael Mayer
|
|
Senior Vice President
and Chief Financial
Officer
|
|
$ |
250,000 |
|
|
$ |
290,000 |
|
James F. Maroney, III
|
|
Vice President,
Secretary and General
Counsel
|
|
$ |
225,000 |
|
|
$ |
240,000 |
|
Kenneth L. Nibling
|
|
Vice PresidentHuman
Resources and
Administration
|
|
$ |
205,000 |
|
|
$ |
225,000 |
|
Robert L. Weisgarber
|
|
Vice
PresidentAccounting
and Controller
|
|
$ |
175,000 |
|
|
$ |
185,000 |
|
32
Item 6. Exhibits.
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
|
|
Exhibit Title |
31.1*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a 14 of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 303 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a 14 of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 303 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
33
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMPLETE PRODUCTION SERVICES, INC. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: August 4, 2006
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ J. Michael Mayer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Michael Mayer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
34
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
No. |
|
|
|
Exhibit Title |
31.1*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a 14 of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 303 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a 14 of the Securities and Exchange Act of
1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 303 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
32.1*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
32.2*
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18
U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |