As filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 24, 2009

Registration No. 333-157208

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

Amendment No. 2

to

Form S-4

REGISTRATION STATEMENT

UNDER

THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933

 

 

TD AMERITRADE HOLDING CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

4211 South 102^nd Street

Omaha, Nebraska 68127

(402) 331-7856

 

(Address, including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, including Area Code, of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices)

 

 

David L. Lambert, Esq.

Deputy General Counsel — Finance/Securities

6940 Columbia Gateway Dr.

Columbia, Maryland 21046

(443) 539-2124

(Name, Address, including Zip Code, and Telephone Number, including Area Code, of Agent for Service)

 

 

 

 

With copies to:

 

 

 

 

 

Approximate date of commencement of the proposed sale of the securities to the public:  As soon as practicable after this Registration Statement becomes effective and upon completion of the merger described in the enclosed document.

 

If the securities being registered on this Form are being offered in connection with the formation of a holding company and there is compliance with General Instruction G, check the following box.  o

 

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  o

 

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering.  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

If applicable, place an X in the box to designate the appropriate rule provision relied upon in conducting this transaction:

 

Exchange Act Rule 13e-4(i) (Cross-Border Issuer Tender Offer)  o

 

Exchange Act Rule 14d-1(d) (Cross-Border Third-Party Tender Offer)  o

 

 

CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE

 

 

 

 

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such dates as the Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

 

 

 

PRELIMINARY — SUBJECT TO COMPLETION — DATED APRIL 24, 2009

 

 

MERGER PROPOSAL, OPTION EXCHANGE PROPOSAL AND PLAN AMENDMENT PROPOSAL

 

YOUR VOTE IS VERY IMPORTANT

 

Dear stockholder:

 

On January 8, 2009, thinkorswim Group Inc., referred to as thinkorswim, and TD AMERITRADE Holding Corporation, referred to as TD AMERITRADE, announced a business combination in which thinkorswim would merge with a subsidiary of TD AMERITRADE. If this merger is completed, you will have the right to receive $3.34 in cash, without interest and less any applicable withholding, referred to as the cash consideration, and 0.3980 of a share of TD AMERITRADE common stock, referred to as the stock consideration, and together with the cash consideration, referred to as the merger consideration, for each outstanding share of common stock of thinkorswim that you hold immediately prior to the merger.

 

The value of the merger consideration will fluctuate with the market price of TD AMERITRADE common stock. The following table shows the closing sale prices of TD AMERITRADE common stock and thinkorswim common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and the NASDAQ Global Market, respectively, on January 7, 2009, the last trading day before the announcement of the potential merger, and on [          ], 2009, the last practicable trading day before the distribution of this document. This table also shows the implied value of the merger consideration proposed for each share of thinkorswim common stock, which we calculated by adding to the cash consideration the product obtained by multiplying the closing price of TD AMERITRADE common stock on those dates by 0.3980, the exchange ratio for the stock consideration.

 

 

The market prices of both TD AMERITRADE common stock and thinkorswim common stock will fluctuate before the merger. You should obtain current stock price quotations for TD AMERITRADE common stock and thinkorswim common stock. TD AMERITRADE common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “AMTD.” thinkorswim common stock is quoted on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “SWIM.”

 

We cannot complete the merger unless thinkorswim’s stockholders approve and adopt the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby, referred to as the merger proposal. thinkorswim will hold a special meeting of its stockholders to vote on the merger proposal at [          ] located at [          ] at [          ], local time, on [          ], 2009. Your vote is important. The market price of TD AMERITRADE common stock will continue to fluctuate following the date of the stockholder vote on the approval and adoption of the merger agreement at the special meeting. Consequently, at the time of the stockholder vote, the value of the merger consideration will not yet be determined. Regardless of whether you plan to attend the special meeting, please take the time to vote your shares in accordance with the instructions contained in this proxy statement/prospectus. Failing to vote will have the same effect as voting against the merger proposal. You will also have an opportunity to vote to approve the adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies in favor of the approval of the merger proposal, referred to as the adjournment proposal.

 

In connection with the proposed transaction, thinkorswim has agreed to implement, subject to stockholder approval, a stock option exchange program, referred to as the exchange program, that will permit thinkorswim’s eligible employees and independent contractors, referred to as eligible individuals, to exchange certain thinkorswim options, which were issued under the thinkorswim Second Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Option Plan, the Telescan, Inc. Amended and Restated 1995 Stock Option Plan, the Telescan, Inc. 2000 Stock Option Plan and the Telescan, Inc. Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan, for thinkorswim restricted stock units, which will be assumed by TD AMERITRADE if the merger is completed. At the special meeting, thinkorswim stockholders will have an opportunity to vote to approve the exchange program and an amendment to thinkorswim’s Second Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Option Plan to permit the grant of thinkorswim restricted stock units. The proposal relating to the option exchange program is referred to as the option exchange proposal. The proposal relating to the amendment of the Stock Option Plan is referred to as the plan amendment proposal. Approval of the option exchange proposal and the plan amendment proposal is not a condition to completion of the merger but the exchange of thinkorswim options for thinkorswim restricted stock units will occur only if the option exchange proposal and the plan amendment proposal are both approved and the merger is completed.

 

The thinkorswim board of directors unanimously recommends that thinkorswim stockholders vote FOR approval of the merger proposal, the option exchange proposal, the plan amendment proposal and the adjournment proposal.

 

This proxy statement/prospectus describes the special meeting, the merger proposal, the option exchange proposal, the plan amendment proposal and the adjournment proposal, the documents related to each proposal, and other related matters. Please carefully read this entire proxy statement/prospectus, including “Risk Factors” beginning on page 12, for a discussion of the risks relating to the merger proposal. You also can obtain information about our companies from documents that each of us has filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors

 

LEE K. BARBA

Chairman of the Board

 

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved the TD AMERITRADE common stock to be issued under this proxy statement/prospectus or determined if this proxy statement/prospectus is accurate or adequate. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

The date of this proxy statement/prospectus is [          ], 2009, and it is first being mailed or otherwise delivered to thinkorswim stockholders on or about [          ], 2009.

 

THINKORSWIM GROUP INC.

45 Rockefeller Plaza, Suite 2012

New York, NY 10111

 

NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

 

[Date]

 

To the stockholders of thinkorswim Group Inc.:

 

thinkorswim Group Inc. (“thinkorswim”) will hold a special meeting of stockholders at [          ] located at [          ] at [          ], local time, on [          ], 2009 to consider and vote upon the following proposals to:

 

 

 

 

 

The thinkorswim board of directors has fixed the close of business on [          ], 2009 as the record date for the special meeting. Only thinkorswim stockholders of record at that time are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the special meeting, or any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting. In order for the Merger Proposal to be approved, the holders of at least a majority of the thinkorswim shares outstanding and entitled to vote thereon must vote in favor of approval of the Merger Proposal. In order for the Option Exchange Proposal, the Plan Amendment Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal to be approved, the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote and present in person or by proxy must vote in favor of approval of each of the Option Exchange Proposal, the Plan Amendment Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal.

 

Regardless of whether you plan to attend the special meeting, please submit your proxy with voting instructions. Please vote as soon as possible. If you hold stock in your name as a stockholder of record, please vote your shares by (i) completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card, (ii) using the telephone number on your proxy card, or (iii) using the Internet voting instructions on your proxy card. If you hold your stock in “street name” through a bank or broker, please direct your bank or broker to vote in accordance with the instructions you have received from your bank or broker. This will not prevent you from voting in person, but it will help to secure a quorum and avoid added solicitation costs. Any holder of thinkorswim common stock who is present at the special meeting may vote in person instead of by proxy, thereby canceling any previous proxy. In any event, a proxy may be revoked in writing at any time before the special meeting in the manner described in the accompanying document.

 

The thinkorswim board of directors has unanimously approved the Merger Proposal, the Option Exchange Proposal, and the Plan Amendment Proposal and unanimously recommends that thinkorswim stockholders vote “FOR” approval of the Merger Proposal, the Option Exchange Proposal, the Plan Amendment Proposal and the Adjournment Proposal.

 

BY ORDER OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS,

 

Paul A. Helbling

Secretary

 

[          ], 2009

 

 

 

 

REFERENCES TO ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

 

This proxy statement/prospectus incorporates important business and financial information about TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim from documents that are not included in or delivered with this document. You can obtain documents incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus, other than certain exhibits to those documents, by requesting them in writing or by telephone from the appropriate company at the following addresses:

 

 

You will not be charged for any of these documents that you request. thinkorswim stockholders requesting documents should do so by [          ], 2009 (which is five business days prior to the date of the special meeting) in order ensure that you to receive them before the special meeting.

 

See “Where You Can Find More Information” on page 88.

 

ABOUT THIS PROXY STATEMENT/PROSPECTUS

 

This proxy statement/prospectus, which forms a part of a registration statement on Form S-4 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, referred to as the SEC, by TD AMERITRADE, constitutes a prospectus of TD AMERITRADE under Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, referred to as the Securities Act, with respect to the shares of TD AMERITRADE common stock to be issued to thinkorswim stockholders in connection with the merger. This document also constitutes a proxy statement under Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, referred to as the Exchange Act, and the rules thereunder, and a notice of meeting with respect to the special meeting of thinkorswim stockholders to consider and vote upon the merger proposal, the adjournment proposal, the option exchange proposal and the plan amendment proposal.

 

Except as otherwise provided herein, all descriptions of and calculations made under the terms of the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, assume that no thinkorswim stockholders exercise appraisal rights under Delaware law.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SUMMARY

										Implied Value of
						thinkorswim				One Share of
		TD AMERITRADE				Common				thinkorswim
		Common Stock				Stock				Common Stock
At January 7, 2009		$	13.48			$	5.65			$	8.705
At [          ], 2009		$				$				$

	•	approve and adopt the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby;

	•	approve a stock option exchange program that will permit thinkorswim’s eligible individuals to exchange underwater thinkorswim options for thinkorswim restricted stock units;

	•	approve an amendment to thinkorswim’s Second Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Option Plan to permit the grant of thinkorswim restricted stock units, which will be assumed by TD AMERITRADE if the merger is completed; and

	•	approve the adjournment of the special meeting, if necessary, to solicit additional proxies, in the event that there are not sufficient votes at the time of the special meeting to approve and adopt the merger agreement.

 

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF TD AMERITRADE

										Fiscal Year Ended
		Three Months Ended December 31,								Sept. 30,				Sept. 30,				Sept. 29,				Sept. 30,				Sept. 24,
		2008				2007				2008				2007				2006*				2005				2004
		(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Consolidated Statements of Income Data:
Net revenues		$	610,729			$	641,616			$	2,537,356			$	2,176,946			$	1,803,531			$	1,003,153			$	880,113
Total expenses			310,167				285,629				1,274,782				1,148,124				1,027,648				449,661				421,026
Other income			—				644				928				5,881				81,422				—				—
Net income			184,398				240,839				803,917				645,900				526,759				339,753				282,818
Earnings per share — basic		$	0.31			$	0.40			$	1.35			$	1.08			$	0.97			$	0.84			$	0.68
Earnings per share — diluted		$	0.31			$	0.40			$	1.33			$	1.06			$	0.95			$	0.82			$	0.66
Weighted average shares outstanding — basic			591,748				594,915				593,746				598,503				544,307				404,215				417,629
Weighted average shares outstanding — diluted			600,601				604,388				603,133				608,263				555,465				413,167				426,972
Dividends declared per share		$	—			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	6.00			$	—			$	—

		As of								As of
		December 31,								Sept. 30,				Sept. 30,				Sept. 29,				Sept. 30,				Sept. 24,
		2008				2007				2008				2007				2006*				2005				2004
		(In thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash and cash equivalents		$	1,154,155			$	494,317			$	674,135			$	413,787			$	363,650			$	171,064			$	137,392
Short-term investments			118,148				—				369,133				76,800				65,275				229,819				17,950
Total assets			12,495,222				18,859,233				15,951,522				18,092,327				16,558,469				16,417,110				15,277,021
Long-term obligations			1,434,860				1,474,907				1,444,544				1,481,948				1,710,712				45,736				37,803
Stockholders’ equity			3,078,090				2,386,659				2,925,038				2,154,921				1,730,234				1,518,867				1,210,908

*		The growth in TD AMERITRADE’s results of operations and increase in long-term obligations during fiscal 2006 was primarily due to the acquisition of TD Waterhouse Group, Inc. on January 24, 2006. TD AMERITRADE declared and paid a special cash dividend of $6.00 per share during fiscal 2006 in connection with the TD Waterhouse acquisition.

 

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED HISTORICAL FINANCIAL DATA OF THINKORSWIM

		Fiscal Year Ended
		Dec. 31,				Dec. 31,				Dec. 31,				Dec. 31,				Dec. 31,
		2008				2007*				2006				2005				2004
		(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Consolidated Statements of Income Data:
Revenues		$	371,805			$	318,009			$	170,330			$	138,621			$	97,169
Operating expenses			287,921				285,240				214,471				154,845				109,079
Net income (loss)			56,117				22,435				(40,732	)			(15,742	)			(11,727	)
Earnings per share — basic		$	0.85			$	0.36			$	(0.90	)		$	(0.35	)		$	(0.26	)
Earnings per share — diluted		$	0.82			$	0.34			$	(0.90	)		$	(0.35	)		$	(0.26	)
Weighted average shares outstanding — basic			66,201				62,942				45,042				44,933				45,045
Weighted average shares outstanding — diluted			68,485				65,790				45,042				44,933				45,045

		As of
		Dec. 31,				Dec. 31,				Dec. 31,				Dec. 31,				Dec. 31,
		2008				2007*				2006				2005				2004
		(In thousands)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
Cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities		$	82,560			$	63,080			$	75,064			$	28,337			$	24,576
Total assets			510,342				509,330				131,637				72,699				49,778
Deferred revenues			110,783				161,870				159,575				77,516				40,378
Total liabilities			285,689				347,435				195,288				96,438				57,010
Stockholders’ equity (deficit)			224,653				161,895				(63,651	)			(23,739	)			(7,232	)

*		The growth in thinkorswim Group Inc.’s results of operations and changes in the total assets and liabilities during fiscal 2007 was primarily due to the acquisition of thinkorswim Holdings, Inc. on February 15, 2007.

 

COMPARATIVE PER SHARE DATA

		TD AMERITRADE								thinkorswim
						Year Ended
		Year Ended				Sept. 30, 2008				Year Ended
		Sept. 30, 2008				Pro Forma				December 31, 2008				Pro Forma
		Historical				Combined				Historical				Equivalent(1)
Earnings per share:
Basic		$	1.35			$	1.33			$	0.85			$	0.86
Diluted		$	1.33			$	1.31			$	0.82			$	0.85
Book value per share at period end		$	4.93			$	5.43			$	3.38			$	3.53

		TD AMERITRADE								thinkorswim
		Three Months Ended December 31, 2008								Three Months Ended
						Pro Forma				December 31, 2008				Pro Forma
		Historical				Combined				Historical				Equivalent(1)
Earnings per share:
Basic		$	0.31			$	0.30			$	0.09			$	0.20
Diluted		$	0.31			$	0.29			$	0.09			$	0.19
Book value per share at period end		$	5.22			$	5.72			$	3.38			$	3.72

(1)		The pro forma thinkorswim equivalent per share amounts were calculated by applying an exchange ratio of 0.65 to the pro forma combined earnings and book value per share. The exchange ratio used in this pro forma table reflects the value of the per share merger consideration of $8.67 divided by the value of a share of TD AMERITRADE common stock of $13.40, with each of the numerator and denominator calculated based on the average of the closing price for TD AMERITRADE common stock for the five trading day period ended January 12, 2009. The final ratio of the per share merger consideration to the value of a share of TD AMERITRADE common stock will vary based on the trading price of TD AMERITRADE common stock.

 

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

	•	factors discussed and identified in public filings with the SEC made by TD AMERITRADE or thinkorswim;
	•	the effect of changes in domestic and global economic conditions in general;
	•	the completion of the merger is dependent on, among other things, receipt of stockholder and regulatory approvals, the timing of which cannot be predicted with precision and which may not be received at all;
	•	the merger may be more expensive to complete than anticipated, including as a result of unexpected factors or events and unanticipated tax consequences of the merger;
	•	the exposure to litigation, including the possibility that litigation relating to the merger agreement and related transactions could delay or impede the completion of the merger;
	•	the integration of thinkorswim’s business and operations with those of TD AMERITRADE may take longer than anticipated, may be more costly than anticipated and may have unanticipated adverse results relating to thinkorswim’s or TD AMERITRADE’s existing businesses; and
	•	the anticipated cost savings and other synergies of the merger may take longer to be realized or may not be achieved in their entirety, and attrition in key client, partner and other relationships relating to the merger may be greater than expected.

 

In addition to the other information included in and incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus, including the matters addressed in the section entitled “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” beginning on page 11, you should carefully consider the following risk factors before deciding whether to vote for approval of the merger proposal, the option exchange proposal, the plan amendment proposal and the adjournment proposal. In addition, you should read and consider the risks associated with the business of TD AMERITRADE because these risks will also affect the combined company. These risks can be found in TD AMERITRADE’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2008 and its Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2008, which are filed with the SEC and incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. You should also read and consider the other information in this proxy statement/prospectus and the other documents incorporated by reference into this proxy statement/prospectus. See the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 88.

 

Because thinkorswim stockholders will receive in the merger (in addition to cash) a fixed number of shares of TD AMERITRADE common stock rather than a fixed value, if the market price of TD AMERITRADE common stock declines, the value of the TD AMERITRADE common stock to be received by thinkorswim stockholders will also decline.

 

Upon completion of the merger, each share of thinkorswim common stock will be converted into merger consideration consisting of an amount of cash of $3.34, without interest and less any required withholding under United States federal, state, local or foreign law, and 0.3980 of a share of TD AMERITRADE common stock. The market value of the merger consideration may vary from the closing price of TD AMERITRADE common stock on the date the merger was announced, on the date that this document was mailed to thinkorswim stockholders, on the date of the special meeting of the thinkorswim stockholders and on the date of completion of the merger and thereafter. Any change in the market price of TD AMERITRADE common stock prior to completion of the merger will affect the market value of the merger consideration that thinkorswim stockholders will receive upon completion of the merger. Accordingly, at the time of the special meeting, thinkorswim stockholders will not know or be able to calculate the market value of the merger consideration they would receive upon completion of the merger. Neither company is permitted to terminate the merger agreement or resolicit the vote of thinkorswim stockholders solely because of changes in the market prices of either company’s stock. There will be no adjustment to the merger consideration for changes in the market price of either shares of TD AMERITRADE common stock or shares of thinkorswim common stock. Stock price changes may result from a variety of factors, including general market and economic conditions, changes in the respective businesses, operations and prospects of TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim, or regulatory considerations. Many of these factors are beyond the control of TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim. You should obtain current market quotations for shares of TD AMERITRADE common stock and for shares of thinkorswim common stock.

 

The market price of TD AMERITRADE’s common stock may decline as a result of the merger.

 

The market price of TD AMERITRADE’s common stock may decline as a result of the merger for a number of reasons, including:

 

 

These factors are, to some extent, beyond TD AMERITRADE’s control. In addition, for thinkorswim stockholders who hold their shares in certificated form, there will be a time period between the effective time of the merger and the time when thinkorswim stockholders actually receive book-entry shares evidencing TD AMERITRADE common stock. Until book-entry shares are received, thinkorswim stockholders will not be able to sell their shares of TD AMERITRADE common stock in the open market and, thus, will not be

able to avoid losses resulting from any decline in the market price of TD AMERITRADE common stock during this period.

 

The failure of TD AMERITRADE to operate and manage the combined company effectively could have a material adverse effect on TD AMERITRADE’s business, financial condition and operating results.

 

TD AMERITRADE will need to meet significant challenges to realize the expected benefits and synergies of the merger. These challenges include:

 

 

The accomplishment of these post-merger objectives will involve considerable risk, including:

 

 

TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim have operated and, until the completion of the merger, will continue to operate, independently. It is possible that the integration process could result in the loss of the technical skills and management expertise of key employees, the disruption of each company’s ongoing businesses or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies due to possible cultural conflicts or differences of opinions on technical decisions and product road maps that adversely affect TD AMERITRADE’s ability to maintain relationships with clients, software developers, customers and employees or to achieve the anticipated benefits of the merger.

 

Even if TD AMERITRADE is able to integrate the thinkorswim business operations successfully, this integration may not result in the realization of the full benefits of synergies, cost savings, innovation and operational efficiencies that may be possible from this integration and these benefits may not be achieved within a reasonable period of time.

 

Failure to retain key employees could diminish the anticipated benefits of the merger.

 

The success of the merger will depend in part on the retention of personnel critical to the business and operations of the combined company due to, for example, their technical skills or management expertise. Employees may experience uncertainty about their future role with thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE until strategies with regard to these employees are announced or executed. If thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE are unable to retain personnel, including thinkorswim’s key management, trading group, sales and client-facing personnel and brokerage and education product and technical development staff, that are critical to the successful integration and future operations of the companies, thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE could face disruptions in their operations, loss of existing customers, loss of key information, expertise or know-how, and unanticipated additional recruitment and training costs. In addition, the loss of key personnel could diminish the anticipated benefits of the merger.

Uncertainty regarding the merger may cause clients to delay or defer decisions concerning TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim and adversely affect each company’s ability to attract and retain key employees.

 

The merger will happen only if stated conditions are met, including the approval of the merger proposal by thinkorswim’s stockholders, the receipt of regulatory approvals, and the absence of any material adverse effect in the business of thinkorswim or TD AMERITRADE. Many of the conditions are outside the control of thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE, and both parties also have stated rights to terminate the merger agreement. Accordingly, there may be uncertainty regarding the completion of the merger. This uncertainty may cause clients to delay or defer decisions concerning thinkorswim or TD AMERITRADE, which could negatively affect their respective businesses. Any delay or deferral of those decisions or changes in existing agreements could have a material adverse effect on the respective businesses of thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE, regardless of whether the merger is ultimately completed. Moreover, diversion of management focus and resources from the day-to-day operation of the business to matters relating to the merger could have a material adverse effect on each company’s business, regardless of whether the merger is completed. Current and prospective employees of each company may experience uncertainty about their future roles with the combined company. This may adversely affect each company’s ability to attract and retain key management, sales, marketing and technical personnel.

 

The market price of TD AMERITRADE common stock after the merger may be affected by factors different from those affecting the shares of thinkorswim or TD AMERITRADE currently.

 

The businesses of TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim differ in important respects and, accordingly, the results of operations of the combined company and the market price of the combined company’s shares of common stock may be affected by factors different from those currently affecting the independent results of operations of TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim. For a discussion of the businesses of TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim and of certain factors to consider in connection with those businesses, see the documents incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus and referred to under “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 88.

 

The merger may go forward in certain circumstances even if TD AMERITRADE or thinkorswim suffers a material adverse effect.

 

In general, either party can refuse to complete the merger if a material adverse effect occurs with regard to the other party before the closing. However, neither party may refuse to complete the merger on that basis as a result of any fact, circumstance, change or effect resulting from:

 

 

 

If adverse changes occur but TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim must still complete the merger, TD AMERITRADE’s stock price may suffer. This in turn may reduce the value of the merger to thinkorswim stockholders.

 

thinkorswim stockholders will have a reduced ownership and voting interest after the merger and will exercise less influence over management. In addition, The Toronto-Dominion Bank and the Ricketts holders exercise significant influence over TD AMERITRADE.

 

thinkorswim stockholders currently have the right to vote in the election of the board of directors of thinkorswim and on other matters affecting thinkorswim. When the merger occurs, each thinkorswim stockholder that receives shares of TD AMERITRADE common stock will become a stockholder of TD AMERITRADE with a percentage ownership of the combined company that is much smaller than the stockholder’s percentage ownership of thinkorswim. It is expected that the former stockholders of thinkorswim as a group will own less than 5% of the outstanding shares of TD AMERITRADE immediately after the merger. Because of this, thinkorswim’s stockholders will have less influence on the management and policies of TD AMERITRADE than they now have on the management and policies of thinkorswim. Furthermore, as of December 22, 2008, The Toronto-Dominion Bank and J. Joe Ricketts, TD AMERITRADE’s founder, members of his family and trusts held for their benefit, referred to as the Ricketts holders, owned approximately 40.3% and 22.2%, respectively, of the outstanding voting securities of TD AMERITRADE. TD AMERITRADE is party to a stockholders agreement with these stockholders that contains certain governance arrangements and various provisions relating to board composition, stock ownership and transfers, voting and other matters. Beginning January 26, 2009, The Toronto-Dominion Bank is permitted to own up to 45% of the outstanding common stock of TD AMERITRADE under the terms of the stockholders agreement. Please see “Comparison of Stockholders’ Rights” beginning on page 70 for a description of certain provisions of the stockholders agreement. As a result of their significant share ownership in TD AMERITRADE, The Toronto-Dominion Bank or the Ricketts holders may have the power, subject to applicable law, to significantly influence actions that might be favorable to The Toronto-Dominion Bank or the Ricketts holders, but not necessarily favorable to other TD AMERITRADE stockholders. In addition, the ownership position and governance rights of The Toronto-Dominion Bank and the Ricketts holders could discourage a third party from proposing a change in control or other strategic transaction concerning TD AMERITRADE. As a result, the common stock of TD AMERITRADE could trade at prices that do not reflect a “takeover premium” to the same extent as do the stocks of similarly situated companies that do not have a stockholder with an ownership interest as large as The Toronto-Dominion Bank’s and the Ricketts holders’ combined ownership interest.

 

The merger agreement limits thinkorswim’s ability to pursue alternatives to the merger.

 

The merger agreement contains “no shop” provisions that, subject to limited exceptions, limit thinkorswim’s ability to discuss, facilitate or commit to competing third-party proposals to acquire all or a significant part of thinkorswim, as well as a termination fee that is payable by thinkorswim under certain circumstances. These provisions might discourage a potential competing acquiror that might have an interest in acquiring all or a significant part of thinkorswim from considering or proposing that acquisition even if it were prepared to pay consideration with a higher per share market price than that proposed in the merger or might result in a potential competing acquiror proposing to pay a lower per share price to acquire thinkorswim than it might otherwise have proposed to pay.

The merger is subject to the receipt of consents and approvals from regulatory authorities that may impose conditions that could have an adverse effect on TD AMERITRADE or, if not obtained, could prevent completion of the merger.

 

Before the merger may be completed, various approvals or consents must be obtained from various domestic and foreign securities regulatory and other authorities. While TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim believe that they will receive the requisite regulatory approvals from these governmental authorities, there can be no assurance of this. In addition, these governmental authorities may impose conditions on the completion of the merger or require changes to the terms of the merger. Although TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim do not currently expect that any such conditions or changes would be imposed, there can be no assurance that they will not be, and such conditions or changes could have the effect of delaying completion of the merger or imposing additional costs on or limiting the revenues of TD AMERITRADE following the merger, any of which might have a material adverse effect on TD AMERITRADE following the merger. For a full description of the regulatory clearances, consents and approvals required for the merger, please see “The Merger — Regulatory Approvals Required for the Merger” beginning on page 46.

 

Failure to complete the merger could negatively affect thinkorswim’s stock price and its future business and operations.

 

If the merger is not completed for any reason, including as a result of an injunction granted in connection with the ongoing thinkorswim stockholder litigation relating to the merger (described on page 47), thinkorswim may be subject to a number of material risks, including the following:

 

 

If the merger agreement is terminated, thinkorswim may be unable to pursue another business combination transaction on terms as favorable as those set forth in the merger agreement, or at all. This could limit thinkorswim’s ability to pursue its strategic goals.

 

TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim may waive one or more of the conditions of the merger without re-soliciting stockholder approval for the merger.

 

Each of the conditions to TD AMERITRADE’s and thinkorswim’s obligations to complete the merger may be waived, in whole or in part, to the extent permitted by applicable law, by agreement of TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim, if the condition is a condition to both TD AMERITRADE’s and thinkorswim’s obligation to complete the merger, or by the party for which such condition is a condition of its obligation to complete the merger. The boards of directors of TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim may evaluate the materiality of any such waiver to determine whether amendment of this proxy statement/prospectus and re-solicitation of proxies are necessary. TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim, however, generally do not expect any such waiver to be significant enough to require re-solicitation of stockholders. In the event that any such waiver is not determined to be significant enough to require re-solicitation of stockholders, the companies will have the discretion to complete the merger without seeking further stockholder approval. If the closing condition requiring receipt by TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim of the opinions of their respective tax counsel were waived, the merger would not be completed before further approval of the thinkorswim stockholders was obtained following delivery of relevant additional disclosure to the stockholders.

 

This section contains information about the special meeting of thinkorswim stockholders that has been called to consider and approve the merger proposal, the option exchange proposal, the plan amendment proposal and the adjournment proposal.

 

Together with this proxy statement/prospectus, thinkorswim is also sending you a notice of the special meeting and a form of proxy that is solicited by the thinkorswim board of directors.

 

The special meeting will be held on [          ], 2009 at [          ], local time, at [          ] located at [          ].

 

The purpose of the special meeting is to vote for approval of the merger proposal, the option exchange proposal, the plan amendment proposal and the adjournment proposal.

 

Each copy of this proxy statement/prospectus mailed to holders of thinkorswim common stock is accompanied by a form of proxy with instructions for voting. If you hold stock in your name as a stockholder of record, you should vote your shares by (i) completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card, (ii) using the telephone number on your proxy card or (iii) using the Internet voting instructions on your proxy card to ensure that your vote is counted at the special meeting, or at any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting, regardless of whether you plan to attend the special meeting.

 

If you hold your stock in “street name” through a bank or broker, you must direct your bank or broker to vote in accordance with the instructions you have received from your bank or broker.

 

If you hold stock in your name as a stockholder of record, you may revoke any proxy at any time before it is voted by signing and returning a proxy card with a later date, delivering a written revocation letter to thinkorswim’s Secretary, or by attending the special meeting in person, notifying the Secretary, and voting by ballot at the special meeting.

 

Any stockholder entitled to vote in person at the special meeting may vote in person regardless of whether a proxy has been previously given, but the mere presence (without notifying the Secretary) of a stockholder at the special meeting will not constitute revocation of a previously given proxy.

 

Written notices of revocation and other communications about revoking your proxy should be addressed to:

 

thinkorswim Group Inc.
13947 South Minuteman Drive
Draper, Utah 84020
Attention: Paul A. Helbling
                 Secretary

 

If your shares are held in “street name” by a bank or broker, you should follow the instructions of your bank or broker regarding the revocation of proxies.

 

All shares represented by valid proxies that are received through this solicitation, and that are not revoked, will be voted in accordance with your instructions on the proxy card. If you make no specification on your proxy card as to how you want your shares voted before signing and returning it, your proxy will be voted “FOR” approval of the merger proposal, “FOR” approval of the option exchange proposal, “FOR” approval of the plan amendment proposal and “FOR” approval of the adjournment proposal. According to the thinkorswim amended and restated bylaws, as amended, business to be conducted at a special meeting of stockholders may only be brought before the meeting by or at the direction of the thinkorswim board of directors, or by any thinkorswim stockholder who is entitled to vote at the meeting and who complies with the

notice provisions set forth in the thinkorswim amended and restated bylaws, as amended. No matters other than the matters described in this document are anticipated to be presented for action at the special meeting or at any adjournment or postponement of the special meeting.

 

thinkorswim stockholders should not send thinkorswim stock certificates with their proxy cards. After the merger is completed, holders of thinkorswim common stock will be mailed a transmittal form with instructions on how to exchange their thinkorswim stock certificates for the merger consideration.

 

Since many thinkorswim stockholders are unable to attend the special meeting, thinkorswim’s board of directors is soliciting proxies to be voted at the special meeting to give each stockholder an opportunity to vote on all matters scheduled to come before the meeting and set forth in this proxy statement/prospectus. thinkorswim’s board of directors is asking stockholders to designate Mr. Lee Barba, Ms. Ida Kane and Mr. Paul Helbling, or any one of them, as their proxies.

 

TD AMERITRADE will pay the costs of printing and mailing this proxy statement/prospectus to thinkorswim’s stockholders, and thinkorswim will pay all other costs incurred by it in connection with the solicitation of proxies from its stockholders on behalf of its board of directors, including the entire cost of soliciting proxies from you. In addition to solicitation of proxies by mail, thinkorswim will request that banks, brokers, and other record holders send proxies and proxy material to the beneficial owners of thinkorswim common stock and secure their voting instructions. thinkorswim will reimburse the record holders for their reasonable expenses in taking those actions. thinkorswim has also made arrangements with Georgeson Inc. to assist it in soliciting proxies and has agreed to pay them $25,000 plus reasonable expenses for these services. Representatives of thinkorswim’s investor relations consultant, ICR Inc., may also solicit proxies. ICR will not be specially compensated for these services. thinkorswim has agreed to indemnify Georgeson and ICR for claims related to these services. If necessary, thinkorswim may use several of its regular employees, who will not be specially compensated, to solicit proxies from thinkorswim stockholders, either personally or by telephone, facsimile, letter or other electronic means.

 

The close of business on [          ], 2009 has been fixed as the record date for determining the thinkorswim stockholders entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the special meeting. At that time, [          ] shares of thinkorswim common stock were outstanding, held by approximately [          ] holders of record.

 

The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of one-third of the outstanding shares of thinkorswim common stock entitled to vote is necessary to constitute a quorum at the special meeting. Abstentions will be counted for the purpose of determining whether a quorum is present.

 

Approval of the merger proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of thinkorswim common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting. You are entitled to one vote for each share of thinkorswim common stock you held as of the record date.

 

Because the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of thinkorswim common stock entitled to vote at the special meeting is needed for us to proceed with the merger contemplated by the merger agreement, the failure to vote by proxy or in person will have the same effect as a vote against the approval of the merger proposal. Abstentions and the failure to instruct your broker also will have the same effect as a vote against the approval of the merger proposal. Accordingly, the thinkorswim board of directors urges thinkorswim stockholders to promptly vote by (i) completing, signing, dating and returning the enclosed proxy card, (ii) using the telephone number on your proxy card, or (iii) using the Internet voting instructions on your proxy card, or, if you hold your stock in “street name” through a bank or broker, by following the voting instructions of your bank or broker.

 

Approval of each of the option exchange proposal, the plan amendment proposal and the adjournment proposal requires the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote and present in person or by proxy, and in the case of the adjournment proposal, even if less than a quorum is present. Because approval of each of these proposals requires the affirmative vote of a majority of shares present in person or by proxy, abstentions will have the same effect as a vote against these proposals. However, the failure to vote, either by proxy or in person, and failure to instruct your broker, will have no effect on the option exchange proposal, the plan amendment proposal or the adjournment proposal. Approval of the option exchange proposal and the plan amendment proposal is not a condition to completion of the merger, and thus the failure to approve the option exchange proposal or the plan amendment proposal will have no impact on whether the merger is completed.

 

Stockholders will vote at the meeting by ballot. Votes cast at the meeting, in person or by proxy, will be tallied by Georgeson Inc., thinkorswim’s proxy solicitor.

 

As of the record date, directors and executive officers of thinkorswim, and their affiliates, had the right to vote [          ] shares of thinkorswim common stock, or [     ]% of the outstanding thinkorswim common stock at that date. thinkorswim currently expects that each of these individuals will vote their shares of thinkorswim common stock in favor of the proposals to be presented at the special meeting. Certain executive officers of thinkorswim and their affiliates, collectively holding [          ] shares of thinkorswim common stock, or [     ]% of the outstanding thinkorswim common stock as of the record date have entered voting agreements with TD AMERITRADE. Pursuant to the voting agreements, these officers have agreed to vote such shares of thinkorswim common stock in favor of the approval of the merger proposal, and have granted a proxy to TD AMERITRADE to vote the shares in such manner.

 

 

The thinkorswim board of directors has unanimously approved and adopted the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby and have unanimously approved the exchange program. The thinkorswim board of directors determined that the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby are advisable and in the best interests of thinkorswim and its stockholders and unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” approval of the merger proposal, “FOR” approval of the option exchange proposal, “FOR” approval of the plan amendment proposal and “FOR” approval of the adjournment proposal. See “thinkorswim Proposal 1 — The Merger — thinkorswim’s Reasons for the Merger; Recommendation of the thinkorswim Board of Directors” on page 28 for a more detailed discussion of the thinkorswim board of directors’ recommendation.

 

 

All holders of thinkorswim common stock, including stockholders of record and stockholders who hold their shares through banks, brokers, nominees or any other holder of record, are invited to attend the special meeting. Stockholders of record can vote in person at the special meeting. If you are not a stockholder of record, you must obtain a proxy executed in your favor, from the record holder of your shares, such as a broker, bank or other nominee, to be able to vote in person at the special meeting. If you plan to attend the special meeting, you must hold your shares in your own name or have a letter from the record holder of your shares confirming your ownership and you must bring a form of personal photo identification with you in order to be admitted. thinkorswim reserves the right to refuse admittance to anyone without proper proof of share ownership and without proper photo identification.

 

 

In addition to voting by proxy or in person at the special meeting, thinkorswim stockholders that hold their shares as the stockholder of record also may vote their shares by using the telephone number on the proxy card or using the Internet voting instructions on the proxy card. thinkorswim stockholders that hold their shares in “street name” through a bank or broker may also vote their shares by following the telephone or Internet voting instructions provided by the bank or broker. If you have internet access, we encourage you to vote via the Internet.

 

 

Although it is not currently expected, the special meeting may be adjourned for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies if thinkorswim has not received sufficient votes to approve the merger proposal at the

special meeting of stockholders. Any adjournments may be made without notice, other than an announcement at the special meeting, by approval of the affirmative vote of holders of at least a majority of shares of thinkorswim common stock who are present in person or represented by proxy at the special meeting. Any adjournment of the special meeting for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies will allow stockholders who have already sent in their proxies to revoke them at any time prior to their use.

 

At any time prior to convening the special meeting, thinkorswim’s board of directors may postpone the special meeting for any reason without the approval of thinkorswim stockholders. If postponed, thinkorswim will provide notice of the new meeting date as required by law. Although it is not currently expected, thinkorswim’s board of directors may postpone the special meeting for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies if thinkorswim has not received sufficient proxies to constitute a quorum or sufficient votes for adoption of the merger agreement. Similar to adjournments, any postponement of the special meeting for the purpose of soliciting additional proxies will allow stockholders who have already sent in their proxies to revoke them at any time prior to their use.

 

To reduce the expenses of delivering duplicate proxy materials to thinkorswim stockholders, thinkorswim is relying upon SEC rules that permit it to deliver only one proxy statement/prospectus to multiple stockholders who share an address unless thinkorswim received contrary instructions from any stockholder at that address. If you share an address with another stockholder and have received only one proxy statement/prospectus, you may write or call thinkorswim as specified below to request a separate copy of this document and thinkorswim will promptly send it to you at no cost to you.

 

Under Delaware law, thinkorswim stockholders are entitled to appraisal rights in connection with the merger. Failure to take any of the steps required under Delaware law on a timely basis may result in the loss of these appraisal rights, as more fully described in “thinkorswim Proposal 1 — The Merger — Appraisal Rights” beginning on page 43.

 

Other Matters

 

As of the date of this proxy statement/prospectus, the thinkorswim board of directors does not know of any other business to be presented for consideration at the special meeting. If other matters properly come before the special meeting, the persons named in the accompanying form of proxy intend to vote on such matters based on their best judgment and they intend to vote the shares as the thinkorswim board of directors may recommend.

 

thinkorswim stockholders who would like additional copies, without charge, of this proxy statement/prospectus or have additional questions about the merger, including the procedures for voting their shares of thinkorswim common stock, should contact:

 

thinkorswim Group Inc.
13947 South Minuteman Drive
Draper, Utah 84020
Attention: Investor Relations
Telephone: (801) 816-6918

 

or thinkorswim’s solicitation agent:

 

Georgeson Inc.
199 Water Street
New York, New York 10038
Toll free: (866) 741-9560

 

TD AMERITRADE Holding Corporation

 

TD AMERITRADE, a Delaware corporation, was established in 1971 as a local investment banking firm and began operations as a retail discount securities brokerage firm in 1975. TD AMERITRADE is a leading provider of securities brokerage services and technology-based financial services to retail investors and business partners, predominantly through the Internet, a national branch network and relationships with one of the largest groups of independent registered investment advisors. TD AMERITRADE common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “AMTD.” The principal executive offices of TD AMERITRADE are located at 4211 South 102nd Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68127, and its telephone number is (402) 331-7856.

 

Additional information about TD AMERITRADE and its subsidiaries is included in documents incorporated by reference in this document. See “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 88.

 

Tango Acquisition Corporation One

 

Tango Acquisition Corporation One, a wholly-owned subsidiary of TD AMERITRADE, was formed solely for the purpose of consummating the merger. Tango Acquisition Corporation One has not carried on any activities to date, except for activities incidental to its formation and activities undertaken in connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. The principal executive offices of Tango Acquisition Corporation One are located at 4211 South 102nd Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68127, and its telephone number is (402) 331-7856.

 

Tango Acquisition Corporation Two

 

Tango Acquisition Corporation Two, a wholly-owned subsidiary of TD AMERITRADE, was formed solely for the purpose of consummating the merger. Tango Acquisition Corporation Two has not carried on any activities to date, except for activities incidental to its formation and activities undertaken in connection with the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. The principal executive offices of Tango Acquisition Corporation Two are located at 4211 South 102nd Street, Omaha, Nebraska 68127, and its telephone number is (402) 331-7856.

 

thinkorswim Group Inc.

 

thinkorswim, a Delaware corporation, offers market-leading investor education and brokerage and related financial products and services for self-directed investors. The investor education segment offers a full range of investor education products and services that provide lifelong learning covering a broad range of financial products, including equity securities, options, fixed income, index products, futures, other derivatives and foreign exchange.

 

The brokerage segment is a leading online brokerage and provider of related technology-based financial services to self-directed options traders and retail investors. The online brokerage segment offers a broad range of products including equity securities, index products, exchange traded options, futures, mutual funds, bonds and foreign exchange. thinkorswim also provides unique scalable software, desktop, mobile and wireless front-end trading platforms that allow its customers to trade electronically and to implement complex multi-leg options strategies with single clicks.

 

thinkorswim common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “SWIM.” The principal executive offices of thinkorswim are located at 45 Rockefeller Plaza, Suite 2012, New York, New York and its telephone number is (801) 816-6918.

 

Additional information about thinkorswim and its subsidiaries is included in documents incorporated by reference in this proxy statement/prospectus. See “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 88.

 

On September 18, 2006, thinkorswim (then known as Investools Inc.) entered into a definitive agreement to acquire thinkorswim Holdings, Inc. (then known as thinkorswim Group, Inc.). On February 15, 2007, this acquisition was completed.

 

In 2006, prior to the execution of the agreement between Investools Inc. and thinkorswim Group, Inc., senior executives of thinkorswim Group, Inc. had met with senior executives of TD AMERITRADE to discuss the nature of their respective businesses and the possibility of exploring strategic initiatives the two companies could jointly pursue. However, no specific proposals were discussed or made at the time.

 

In August 2007, senior representatives of thinkorswim and a publicly traded company in the brokerage sector, referred to as Party A, engaged in preliminary discussions of potential strategic transactions, including a possible combination of the two companies. On September 20, 2007, at a meeting of executives from Party A and thinkorswim and a representative from thinkorswim’s financial advisor, Paragon Capital Partners, LLC, referred to as Paragon, the parties discussed preliminary transaction structures for a possible combination of the businesses. The parties did not discuss a valuation for thinkorswim. The parties ceased discussions following this meeting because there was little agreement as to the potential terms of a transaction.

 

Also in September 2007, senior executives of TD AMERITRADE contacted Lee Barba, the Chairman and CEO of thinkorswim, to express interest in a possible strategic transaction with thinkorswim. Senior executives of both companies as well as representatives of Paragon spoke over the phone and met in person on several occasions during September 2007 to explore the possibility of a strategic transaction. On September 17, 2007, the two companies signed a reciprocal confidentiality agreement. In October 2007, an executive from TD AMERITRADE informed a representative of Paragon that TD AMERITRADE would not proceed with discussions at that time because TD AMERITRADE was considering other strategic transactions. The executive from TD AMERITRADE indicated that TD AMERITRADE might re-engage with thinkorswim at another time.

 

In May 2008, a senior executive of TD AMERITRADE contacted Mr. Barba to reinitiate discussions about the possibility of exploring a strategic transaction. In consultation with Paragon, thinkorswim resumed exploratory discussions with TD AMERITRADE. Also in May 2008, the senior executive of a private company engaged in the broker-dealer sector, referred to as Party B, contacted a senior executive of thinkorswim to discuss a possible business combination of Party B and thinkorswim. On May 16, 2008, thinkorswim and Party B executed a reciprocal confidentiality agreement. thinkorswim and Party B then engaged in discussions exploring possibilities for a strategic transaction, including a business combination.

 

On May 23, 2008, a senior executive of thinkorswim called a senior executive of TD AMERITRADE to inform him that thinkorswim was in negotiations with a potential partner for a strategic transaction that would be an alternative to a combination of TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim. The senior executive from TD AMERITRADE expressed continued interest in pursuing a transaction with thinkorswim in view of the logical fit between thinkorswim and the strategic interests of TD AMERITRADE. That same day, Fredric Tomczyk, the then current chief operating officer and incoming CEO of TD AMERITRADE, called Mr. Barba and reiterated TD AMERITRADE’s interest in thinkorswim. The two parties, together with representatives of Paragon and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, referred to as Merrill Lynch, TD AMERITRADE’s financial advisor, proceeded with initial management discussions and due diligence over the next few days.

 

On May 27, 2008, senior management of thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE and representatives of Paragon and Merrill Lynch, held a meeting to discuss each company’s businesses and the possibility of a business combination. During this meeting, representatives of TD AMERITRADE indicated that the retention of certain members of thinkorswim’s management team was critical to TD AMERITRADE’s interest in acquiring thinkorswim.

On June 4, 2008, TD AMERITRADE presented thinkorswim with a preliminary, non-binding written proposal to acquire thinkorswim for consideration with a value of $11 to $13 per share (based on the market value per share of TD AMERITRADE common stock of $18.19 as of the market close on June 3, 2008) to be paid in a combination of cash and TD AMERITRADE common stock. TD AMERITRADE indicated that its proposal would not be subject to any financing contingency. TD AMERITRADE also requested a period of exclusive negotiations.

 

On or about June 4, 2008, a representative of Party B communicated to a senior executive of thinkorswim and a representative of Paragon the interest of Party B in a stock-for-stock merger with thinkorswim. Party B did not propose a specific valuation range or exchange ratio at that time.

 

On June 5, 2008, Mr. Tom Sosnoff, a director and executive officer of thinkorswim and Joseph H. Moglia, the then current CEO and current chairman of TD AMERITRADE, met and discussed TD AMERITRADE’s proposal.

 

On June 6, 2008, the thinkorswim board of directors held a special meeting with thinkorswim’s senior management and representatives of Paragon to consider the proposals of TD AMERITRADE and Party B. Representatives of Paragon and senior management reviewed with the board of directors their discussions with TD AMERITRADE and Party B and the proposals received from each. The board members discussed the relative merits of each proposal and the other alternatives available to thinkorswim, including continuing as a stand-alone business and pursuing other combinations, acquisitions or divestitures. At this meeting, the board of directors also received an update on the ongoing investigation by the SEC relating to thinkorswim’s investor education seminars and related risks, referred to as the SEC Investigation.

 

The thinkorswim board of directors considered the TD AMERITRADE proposal to be more favorable to thinkorswim’s stockholders because the proposed mixture of cash and TD AMERITRADE stock as consideration would provide thinkorswim’s stockholders with reasonably certain value and the ability to participate in the synergies created by the transaction. Furthermore, because TD AMERITRADE was a large, well-established business entity and Party B was a smaller, non-public entity, the board believed there would be less execution risk in a transaction with TD AMERITRADE than a transaction with Party B and that there would be significant uncertainty as to the trading price of a share of the combined company resulting from a merger with Party B. The board of directors authorized the senior management of thinkorswim to proceed with discussions with both TD AMERITRADE and Party B and to make counterproposals to or invite revised proposals from each party.

 

After the board of directors meeting, Mr. Barba called Mr. Tomczyk to suggest a counterproposal for a merger involving consideration valued at $13 to $14 per share of thinkorswim common stock (based on the market value per share of TD AMERITRADE common stock at that time). Mr. Barba also sent a letter to TD AMERITRADE dated June 6, 2008, indicating that thinkorswim would consider an offer of consideration valued at $13 to $14 per share of thinkorswim common stock.

 

On June 7, 2008, Party B delivered a non-binding proposal contemplating a merger between Party B and thinkorswim in a stock-for-stock merger in which thinkorswim stockholders would be diluted by the exchange of newly issued shares of thinkorswim common stock for the outstanding shares of Party B, with the result being that thinkorswim’s pre-merger stockholders would own approximately 40% of the combined company’s common stock, with the projected per share trading value being approximately $11.15 per share.

 

Also on June 7, 2008, Mr. Tomczyk phoned Mr. Barba and indicated that TD AMERITRADE was willing to consider increasing the range of its proposal to $12 to $13 per share of thinkorswim stock to be paid with a combination of cash and TD AMERITRADE common stock. In a subsequent conversation, Mr. Barba proposed $13 per share, and following an internal discussion at TD AMERITRADE, Mr. Tomczyk indicated, subject to completion of due diligence, negotiation of definitive documentation and approval by the TD AMERITRADE board of directors, he would be willing to seek support from his senior management team and board of directors for a merger transaction in which the merger consideration would consist of a fixed combination of TD AMERITRADE common stock and cash with a value of $13 per share (based on the market value per share of TD AMERITRADE common stock at that time).

On June 9, 2008, the thinkorswim board of directors held a special board meeting to discuss, in consultation with thinkorswim’s management and representatives of Paragon, the ongoing discussions with TD AMERITRADE and Party B.

 

At the meeting a representative of Paragon described Party B’s proposal and reported that, based on discussions with Party B’s financial advisor, Paragon believed the proposal represented Party B’s best and final offer. The members of the board discussed Party B’s proposal, including the risks and uncertainties to thinkorswim’s stockholders of engaging in an all-stock merger with a company that had not yet gone through the SEC registration process and would be valued at 60% of the combined company.

 

A representative of Paragon then described TD AMERITRADE’S proposal and reported that, after several discussions with representatives of TD AMERITRADE and Merrill Lynch concerning the consideration to be paid, a representative of TD AMERITRADE had orally confirmed that TD AMERITRADE was willing to consider a value of $13 per share (based on the market value per share of TD AMERITRADE common stock at that time), consisting of a fixed combination of cash and TD AMERITRADE common stock. The members of the board discussed TD AMERITRADE’s proposal, including the advantages to stockholders in terms of certainty and value and TD AMERITRADE’s request to enter into an exclusivity agreement as a condition to continuing discussions. Members of the board expressed the belief that a transaction with Party B would involve considerably greater execution risk and less certain value for stockholders than a transaction with TD AMERITRADE.

 

The members of the thinkorswim board of directors expressed concern that, given the recent drop in thinkorswim’s trading price following the public announcement of the SEC Investigation, if word leaked that thinkorswim was considering offers to sell itself, there were risks that thinkorswim would be forced into a disorderly public auction process that would be detrimental to the business operations of thinkorswim and not obtain the best price for thinkorswim’s stockholders. The thinkorswim board of directors deliberated about the existence of other opportunities worth pursuing in lieu of the outstanding offers of TD AMERITRADE and Party B. After discussion, including consideration of thinkorswim’s stand-alone prospects, the board determined that management should continue to pursue discussions with TD AMERITRADE on an exclusive basis.

 

On June 12, 2008, thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE agreed to a period of exclusive negotiations continuing until June 30, 2008 and an extension of their reciprocal confidentiality agreement originally signed in September 2007. Following execution of the exclusivity agreement, TD AMERITRADE received access to confidential financial and operational information regarding thinkorswim and both companies engaged in due diligence review of each other’s business.

 

On June 13, 2008, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton LLP, referred to as Cleary Gottlieb, legal counsel to thinkorswim, received a draft merger agreement from Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, Professional Corporation, referred to as Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, legal counsel to TD AMERITRADE. Thereafter, until the termination of negotiations by TD AMERITRADE, both companies worked to negotiate and finalize draft documentation for the proposed transaction.

 

On June 20, 2008, the thinkorswim board of directors held a special board meeting to discuss and analyze, in consultation with representatives of Paragon, Cleary Gottlieb and management, updates on the status of the potential transaction, including progress on due diligence, negotiation of transaction agreements and further discussions with TD AMERITRADE. At this meeting, representatives of Cleary Gottlieb reviewed the fiduciary duties of the directors associated with their evaluation of different strategic alternatives. Also at this meeting, the board discussed, including in executive session without management, the terms of the proposed merger agreement and voting agreement and the insistence by TD AMERITRADE, as a condition to entering into the merger agreement, that certain management stockholders enter into voting agreements and employment agreements with TD AMERITRADE.

 

Thereafter, due diligence and negotiation of definitive documentation by the parties, Paragon, Merrill Lynch and the parties’ respective legal advisors continued. On or about June 23, 2008, TD AMERITRADE contacted representatives of thinkorswim to indicate that, due to various concerns, including concerns with the

potential exposure relating to the SEC Investigation, TD AMERITRADE no longer wished to proceed with negotiations regarding a potential transaction and was releasing thinkorswim from its exclusivity obligations.

 

Following the termination of exclusive discussions with TD AMERITRADE, thinkorswim resumed discussions with Party B regarding a potential transaction, including a proposal involving preferred equity of Party B that would have allocated more voting power to the pre-merger thinkorswim stockholders, but would not have meaningfully altered the overall economic allocation of equity in the combined company as proposed on June 7, 2008, and continued from time to time to engage in discussions with TD AMERITRADE. On July 10, 2008, representatives of TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim briefly discussed the possibility of a sale of only the brokerage division of thinkorswim. On July 29, 2008, representatives of thinkorswim and Party B met to discuss a potential transaction. In August 2008, Party B indicated it was no longer interested in proceeding with a transaction and thinkorswim’s discussions with Party B terminated.

 

Throughout the fall of 2008, senior executives of TD AMERITRADE continued to contact Mr. Barba to inquire about the status of the SEC Investigation and the state of thinkorswim’s business.

 

In November 2008, a senior executive from Party A contacted a senior executive of thinkorswim to express interest in a potential business combination of Party A and thinkorswim. On November 24, 2008, senior executives of both companies met and discussed a potential transaction.

 

On or about December 3, 2008, Mr. Barba and Mr. Tomczyk met to discuss a potential transaction. During this meeting, Mr. Tomczyk indicated that TD AMERITRADE was considering making a proposal to acquire thinkorswim in a transaction in which each outstanding share of thinkorswim common stock would be converted into 0.58 to 0.61 of a share of TD AMERITRADE common stock.

 

On December 4 and 5, 2008, Party A’s financial advisor contacted a representative of Paragon to discuss the details of a proposal for Party A to merge with thinkorswim. On December 5, 2008, senior executives of Party A and thinkorswim met again for discussions.

 

On or about December 9, 2008, Mr. Tomczyk contacted Mr. Barba to inquire about thinkorswim’s reaction to the terms discussed on December 3. Mr. Barba indicated that thinkorswim’s senior management believed the proposal would need to be increased to be of interest, but that it would be discussed at the next meeting of the thinkorswim board of directors. During this discussion, Mr. Tomczyk asked whether a proposal that involved all-cash consideration would be more attractive to thinkorswim. Mr. Barba indicated that he believed that a mixture of stock and cash would be more attractive than an all-cash proposal because it would allow thinkorswim’s stockholders to benefit from the potential future growth of the companies and share in the potential synergies created by the merger.

 

On December 11, 2008, thinkorswim received a written non-binding proposal from Party A for a merger in which each outstanding share of thinkorswim common stock would be exchanged for a portion of a share of Party A’s common stock with a value of approximately $6.18, based on the closing price of Party A’s common stock as of December 11, 2008. This value excluded future value creation that would accrue to the benefit of thinkorswim stockholders as a result of realizing the anticipated synergies attributable to this potential transaction. In connection with considering Party A’s proposal, thinkorswim’s management and board of directors took into account not only the current and historical market value of Party A’s common stock, but also the potential for this business combination to generate synergies and the benefits of these synergies to thinkorswim’s stockholders as a result of their retaining a significantly larger equity ownership percentage in a Party A/thinkorswim combination than in a TD AMERITRADE/thinkorswim combination. Party A also indicated that it was willing to discuss replacing some of the stock consideration with cash. Party A requested that thinkorswim agree to exclusive negotiations for a period of two weeks.

 

Also on December 11, 2008, thinkorswim received a written non-binding proposal from TD AMERITRADE. The proposal provided that, subject to the completion of confirmatory due diligence and negotiation of definitive transaction documents, TD AMERITRADE would propose to acquire all of thinkorswim’s outstanding capital stock for a combination of cash and stock, using approximately $145 million in cash and the remainder paid in shares of TD AMERITRADE common stock, such that the total consideration would imply an exchange ratio of 0.625 to 0.650. Based on the closing price of TD AMERITRADE’s common stock as of December 11, 2008, this implied a

value per fully diluted thinkorswim share of $8.08 to $8.40, and represented a premium of 41% to 47% to the trading price of thinkorswim common stock at the time. TD AMERITRADE’s letter also noted the significant work it had previously conducted in connection with a proposed transaction and indicated that, if thinkorswim agreed to exclusive negotiations, TD AMERITRADE could complete its due diligence in two to three weeks and negotiate definitive transaction documents expeditiously. Later that day, Mr. Tomczyk called Mr. Barba to discuss the terms of TD AMERITRADE’s proposal.

 

On December 12, 2008, the thinkorswim board of directors held a special meeting to discuss the proposals from Party A and TD AMERITRADE, as well as thinkorswim’s stand-alone prospects and strategic alternatives. Representatives of Cleary Gottlieb and Paragon participated in the meeting. Representatives of Cleary Gottlieb reviewed the fiduciary duties of the directors associated with their evaluation of different strategic alternatives. Representatives of Paragon and management then provided an overview of thinkorswim’s stand-alone prospects and various strategic alternatives. Representatives of Paragon also provided analysis of the indicative proposals from TD AMERITRADE and Party A.

 

In consultation with the representatives of Cleary Gottlieb and Paragon, members of senior management and the board of directors engaged in a detailed discussion regarding TD AMERITRADE’s and Party A’s proposals. The board of directors analyzed the relative premiums afforded by each of the proposals and, based on current and historical trading prices, noted that TD AMERITRADE’s proposal would provide thinkorswim’s stockholders with a significantly greater premium than Party A’s proposal. The board of directors also noted that TD AMERITRADE had already conducted significant due diligence and thus was better prepared to enter into a definitive agreement within a short timeframe, while Party A had not yet conducted any significant due diligence. The board of directors discussed TD AMERITRADE’s and Party A’s future business prospects.

 

The board of directors also considered thinkorswim’s prospects if it remained independent, noting that thinkorswim continued to face risks from the ongoing SEC Investigation, the decline in economic conditions and the impact of those conditions on the online brokerage industry, and the continuing challenges of integration of the investor education and brokerage sides of the thinkorswim business.

 

The board of directors also considered whether to approach other potential acquirors of thinkorswim. After considering the universe of other potential acquirors (including the withdrawn proposal by Party B), the general financial situation of those potential acquirors and their strategic fit with thinkorswim, the board of directors, in consultation with Paragon and Cleary Gottlieb, concluded that no other parties would be expected to be interested in pursuing a strategic transaction on terms superior to those proposed by TD AMERITRADE. The board of directors also considered that both TD AMERITRADE and Party A had insisted on a period of exclusivity before continuing with further negotiations. The board discussed whether it would be possible to continue engaging in discussions with both TD AMERITRADE and Party A, but concluded that there was a significant risk that one or both of the potential acquirors would abandon negotiations if not granted a period of exclusive negotiations. Following these discussions, the board of directors unanimously agreed that management should pursue exclusive negotiations with TD AMERITRADE, but should ensure that TD AMERITRADE would assume the risks relating to the SEC Investigation.

 

Following the December 12, 2008 board meeting, Mr. Tomczyk met with Mr. Sheridan, a director and executive officer of thinkorswim, and Mr. Sosnoff, to discuss their interest in remaining with TD AMERITRADE following a transaction and to answer questions from Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Sosnoff about TD AMERITRADE.

 

On December 13, 2008, Mr. Barba communicated to Mr. Tomczyk a counterproposal for a sale of thinkorswim for a total of 35 million shares of TD AMERITRADE common stock and $150 million in cash, implying consideration per fully diluted share of thinkorswim common stock of approximately $2.15 in cash and 0.50 of a share of TD AMERITRADE common stock. Based on the closing price of TD AMERITRADE’s common stock as of December 11, 2008, this implied a value per fully diluted share of thinkorswim common stock of $8.61. Mr. Barba also offered to enter into exclusive negotiations with TD AMERITRADE.

On December 14, 2008, Mr. Tomczyk agreed to consider Mr. Barba’s counterproposal subject to completion of due diligence and requested to commence immediately due diligence and the negotiation of definitive documentation.

 

On December 16, 2008, Mr. Tomczyk phoned Mr. Barba and said that the M&A committee of TD AMERITRADE’s board of directors, which had met earlier that day, had agreed to move forward with negotiations and would consider a final offer price, subject to further analysis and due diligence, in the range between the low end of TD AMERITRADE’s December 11, 2008 proposal and thinkorswim’s counterproposal. That same day, thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE entered into a letter agreement for exclusive negotiations until January 8, 2009.

 

Following execution of the exclusivity agreement, thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE each engaged in due diligence investigations, including the exchange and review of draft disclosure schedules to the merger agreement for thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE.

 

On December 17 and December 18, 2008, senior management of thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE met for business and due diligence discussions.

 

On December 19, 2008, the board of directors of thinkorswim held a special meeting to review the progress of the negotiations. Mr. Barba reported on his discussions with TD AMERITRADE following the last board meeting, and representatives of Paragon presented an overview of the progress on due diligence and reverse due diligence. The board of directors also received an update on the status of the SEC Investigation.

 

On December 21, 2008, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati delivered to Cleary Gottlieb a draft merger agreement based on the draft merger agreement the parties had discussed in June 2008, and then the parties began to negotiate the terms of the merger agreement. On December 30, 2008, Mr. Tomczyk met with Mr. Sosnoff and Mr. Barba to discuss further the transaction. On December 31, 2008, the board of directors of thinkorswim held a special meeting with representatives of senior management, Paragon and Cleary Gottlieb to review progress in the negotiation of the transaction. The board discussed the proposed terms of the merger agreement and the results of reverse due diligence. In particular, the board revisited the issue of whether TD AMERITRADE had agreed that the SEC Investigation would not constitute a basis for not closing the transaction. Management, in consultation with Paragon and Cleary Gottlieb, explained that TD AMERITRADE had agreed to the inclusion of the SEC Investigation, among other matters, in the disclosure schedule to the merger agreement and that the merger agreement would provide that the items in the disclosure schedule would qualify the representations and warranties and the closing condition that no material adverse effect had occurred.

 

On January 4, 2009, Mr. Tomczyk contacted Mr. Barba by telephone and indicated that, as a result of its review of thinkorswim’s business, risks and prospects, TD AMERITRADE was now proposing to acquire thinkorswim’s outstanding capital stock for approximately $145 million in cash and 31.5 million shares of TD AMERITRADE common stock. This proposal implied a total value of approximately $8.52 per fully diluted share of thinkorswim common stock, based on the closing price of TD AMERITRADE common stock on January 2, 2009, of $14.25. Mr. Barba indicated that he did not believe the thinkorswim board of directors would approve a transaction at that level. Following continued negotiations, Mr. Tomczyk proposed a transaction consisting of approximately $225 million in cash and 28.3 million shares of TD AMERITRADE common stock, representing the final per fully diluted share price of $3.34 in cash and 0.3980 of a share of TD AMERITRADE common stock. Based on the trading price of TD AMERITRADE common stock at the close of business on January 2, 2009, this proposal had an implied value of $9.01 per fully diluted share of thinkorswim common stock.

 

Also on January 4, 2009, TD AMERITRADE delivered draft employment agreements for Mr. Barba, Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Sosnoff. TD AMERITRADE reiterated that its willingness to enter into the merger agreement was conditioned on these officers of thinkorswim entering into employment agreements with TD AMERITRADE.

 

On the evening of January 6, 2009, the board of directors of TD AMERITRADE met and approved the proposed transaction.

On the evening of January 7, 2009, the thinkorswim board of directors held a meeting to consider the potential transaction with TD AMERITRADE. Representatives of Cleary Gottlieb, Paragon and UBS, which had been retained to render an opinion to the thinkorswim board of directors as to the fairness, from a financial point of view, of the proposed merger consideration, participated in the meeting. A representative of Paragon reviewed the history of negotiations between thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE, the terms of the proposed transaction and the results of the reverse due diligence on TD AMERITRADE. The board also discussed, in consultation with management and Paragon, thinkorswim’s stand-alone prospects and alternatives. Representatives of Cleary Gottlieb reviewed the proposed merger agreement and voting agreement. Also at this meeting, UBS reviewed with thinkorswim’s board of directors UBS’ financial analysis of the per share merger consideration and delivered to thinkorswim’s board of directors an oral opinion, which was confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated January 7, 2009, to the effect that, as of that date and based on and subject to various assumptions, matters considered and limitations described in its opinion, the per share consideration to be received in the transaction by holders of thinkorswim common stock (other than excluded holders) was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders.

 

The board of directors then considered the proposed terms of the employment agreements that TD AMERITRADE was requiring Mr. Barba, Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Sosnoff to enter into as a condition to its execution of the merger agreement.

 

Following discussion of the proposed transaction, the stand-alone prospects and alternatives for thinkorswim and review of the merger agreement and the disclosure schedules, voting agreements, employment agreements and related documents, the thinkorswim board of directors unanimously approved the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement, including the merger, and resolved to recommend that the stockholders of thinkorswim vote to adopt the merger agreement and approve the merger.

 

The merger agreement and the voting agreements were entered into on January 8, 2009, and the transaction was publicly announced that same day.

 

thinkorswim’s board of directors consulted with thinkorswim’s management, as well as thinkorswim’s outside legal counsel and its financial advisor, Paragon, in its evaluation of the merger. In reaching its conclusion to approve and adopt the merger agreement and in determining that the merger was advisable and in the best interests of thinkorswim and its stockholders, the thinkorswim board considered a number of factors and the potential benefits of the merger and the risks of thinkorswim remaining as a stand-alone company, including the following material factors, each of which the board of directors believed supported its decision:

 

 

 

The thinkorswim board of directors also considered a variety of risks and other potentially negative factors concerning the merger and the merger agreement, including the following:

 

 

 

The foregoing discussion of the information and factors considered by the thinkorswim board of directors is not exhaustive, but includes the material factors considered by the thinkorswim board of directors. In view of the wide variety of factors considered by the thinkorswim board of directors in connection with its evaluation of the merger and the complexity of these matters, the thinkorswim board of directors did not consider it practical to, nor did it attempt to, quantify, rank or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors that it considered in reaching its decision. The thinkorswim board of directors evaluated the factors described above and reached consensus that the merger was advisable and in the best interests of thinkorswim and thinkorswim’s stockholders. In considering the factors described above, individual members of the thinkorswim board of directors may have given different weights to different factors.

 

The thinkorswim board of directors determined that the merger, the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement are advisable and in the best interests of thinkorswim and its stockholders. Accordingly, the thinkorswim board of directors unanimously approved the merger and approved and adopted the merger agreement and unanimously recommends that thinkorswim stockholders vote “FOR” approval of the merger proposal.

 

On January 7, 2009, at a meeting of thinkorswim’s board of directors held to evaluate the proposed transaction, UBS delivered to thinkorswim’s board of directors an oral opinion, which opinion was confirmed by delivery of a written opinion dated January 7, 2009, to the effect that, as of that date and based on and subject to various assumptions, matters considered and limitations described in its opinion, the per share consideration to be received in the transaction by holders of thinkorswim common stock (other than excluded holders) was fair, from a financial point of view, to such holders.

 

The full text of UBS’ opinion describes the assumptions made, procedures followed, matters considered and limitations on the review undertaken by UBS. This opinion is attached as Appendix C and is incorporated into this proxy statement/prospectus by reference. Holders of thinkorswim common stock are encouraged to read UBS’ opinion carefully in its entirety. UBS’ opinion was provided for the benefit of thinkorswim’s board of directors in connection with, and for the purpose of, its evaluation of the per share merger consideration from a financial point of view and does not address any other aspect of the transaction. The opinion does not address the relative merits of the transaction as compared to other business strategies or transactions that might be available with respect to thinkorswim or thinkorswim’s underlying business decision to effect the transaction. The opinion does not constitute a recommendation to any stockholder as to how such stockholder should vote or act with respect to the transaction. Although subsequent developments may affect its opinion, UBS does not have any obligation to update, revise or reaffirm its opinion. The following summary of UBS’ opinion is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of UBS’ opinion.

 

In arriving at its opinion, UBS, among other things:

 

 

 

In connection with its review, with the consent of thinkorswim’s board of directors, UBS assumed and relied upon, without independent verification, the accuracy and completeness in all material respects of the information provided to or reviewed by UBS for the purpose of its opinion. In addition, with the consent of thinkorswim’s board of directors, UBS did not make any independent evaluation or appraisal of any of the assets or liabilities, contingent or otherwise, of thinkorswim or TD AMERITRADE, and was not furnished with any such evaluation or appraisal. With respect to the financial forecasts and estimates referred to above, UBS assumed, at the direction of thinkorswim’s board of directors, that such forecasts and estimates had been reasonably prepared on a basis reflecting the best currently available estimates and judgments of the managements of thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE as to the future financial performance of thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE. UBS assumed, with the consent of thinkorswim’s board of directors, that the transaction would qualify for United States federal income tax purposes as a reorganization within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. UBS’ opinion was necessarily based on economic, monetary, market and other conditions as in effect on, and the information available to UBS as of, the date of its opinion.

 

In connection with its engagement, UBS was not requested to, and it did not, participate in the negotiation or structuring of the transaction. While UBS was not authorized to solicit and did not solicit indications of interest in a transaction with thinkorswim from any party, representatives of thinkorswim advised UBS that indications of interests in a transaction with thinkorswim were solicited from third parties on behalf of thinkorswim and that discussions with certain of these parties were held prior to the date of UBS’ opinion. At the direction of thinkorswim’s board of directors, UBS was not asked to, and it did not, offer any opinion as to the terms, other than the per share merger consideration to the extent expressly specified in UBS’ opinion, of the merger agreement or the form of the transaction. In addition, UBS expressed no opinion as to the fairness of the amount or nature of any compensation to be received by any officers, directors or employees of any parties to the transaction, or any class of such persons, relative to the per share merger consideration. UBS expressed no opinion as to what the value of TD AMERITRADE common stock would be when issued pursuant to the transaction or the prices at which TD AMERITRADE common stock or thinkorswim common stock would trade at any time. In rendering its opinion, UBS assumed, with the consent of thinkorswim’s board of directors, that (i) the final executed form of the merger agreement would not differ in any material respect from the draft that UBS reviewed, (ii) the parties to the merger agreement would comply with all material terms of the merger agreement, and (iii) the transaction would be consummated in accordance with the terms of the merger agreement without any adverse waiver or amendment of any material term or condition of the merger agreement. UBS also assumed that all governmental, regulatory or other consents and approvals necessary for the consummation of the transaction would be obtained without any material adverse effect on thinkorswim, TD AMERITRADE or the transaction. Except as described above, thinkorswim imposed no other instructions or limitations on UBS with respect to the investigations made or

the procedures followed by UBS in rendering its opinion. The issuance of UBS’ opinion was approved by an authorized committee of UBS.

 

In connection with rendering its opinion to thinkorswim’s board of directors, UBS performed a variety of financial and comparative analyses which are summarized below. The following summary is not a complete description of all analyses performed and factors considered by UBS in connection with its opinion. The preparation of a financial opinion is a complex process involving subjective judgments and is not necessarily susceptible to partial analysis or summary description. With respect to the selected companies analyses of thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE and the selected transactions analysis summarized below, no company or transaction used as a comparison was identical to thinkorswim, TD AMERITRADE or the transaction. These analyses necessarily involve complex considerations and judgments concerning financial and operating characteristics and other factors that could affect the public trading or acquisition values of the companies concerned.

 

UBS believes that its analyses and the summary below must be considered as a whole and that selecting portions of its analyses and factors or focusing on information presented in tabular format, without considering all analyses and factors or the narrative description of the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of the processes underlying UBS’ analyses and opinion. UBS did not draw, in isolation, conclusions from or with regard to any one factor or method of analysis for purposes of its opinion, but rather arrived at its ultimate opinion based on the results of all analyses undertaken by it and assessed as a whole.

 

The estimates of the future performance of thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE provided by the managements of thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE or derived from public sources in or underlying UBS’ analyses are not necessarily indicative of future results or values, which may be significantly more or less favorable than those estimates. In performing its analyses, UBS considered industry performance, general business and economic conditions and other matters, many of which were beyond the control of thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE. Estimates of the financial value of companies do not purport to be appraisals or necessarily reflect the prices at which companies actually may be sold.

 

The merger consideration was determined through negotiation between thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE and the decision by thinkorswim to enter into the transaction was solely that of thinkorswim’s board of directors. UBS’ opinion and financial analyses were only one of many factors considered by thinkorswim’s board of directors in its evaluation of the transaction and should not be viewed as determinative of the views of thinkorswim’s board of directors or management with respect to the transaction or the merger consideration. UBS was not asked to, and it did not, perform a financial analysis of the stock option exchange program provided for in the merger agreement and expressed no opinion as to such program.

 

The following is a brief summary of the material financial analyses performed by UBS and reviewed with thinkorswim’s board of directors on January 7, 2009, in connection with UBS’ opinion relating to the proposed transaction. The financial analyses summarized below include information presented in tabular format. In order to fully understand UBS’ financial analyses, the tables must be read together with the text of each summary. The tables alone do not constitute a complete description of the financial analyses. Considering the data below without considering the full narrative description of the financial analyses, including the methodologies and assumptions underlying the analyses, could create a misleading or incomplete view of UBS’ financial analyses. For purposes of the “thinkorswim Financial Analyses” described below, the term “implied value of the per share merger consideration” refers to the $8.98 implied value of the per share merger consideration based on the per share cash portion of the merger consideration of $3.34 and the implied value, utilizing the closing price of TD AMERITRADE common stock on January 6, 2009, of the per share stock portion of the merger consideration of 0.3980 of a share of TD AMERITRADE common stock.

 

thinkorswim Financial Analyses

 

thinkorswim Selected Companies Analysis.  UBS compared selected financial and stock market data of thinkorswim with corresponding data of TD AMERITRADE and the following five publicly traded companies in the online brokerage industry, which is the industry in which thinkorswim operates. Two of these

companies, referred to as the selected eBrokers, were selected because they are primarily focused, as is thinkorswim, on the execution of online trading transactions for retail customers and three of these companies, referred to as the other selected companies, were selected because they provide online brokerage services even though they provide more diversified services than thinkorswim:

 

 

UBS reviewed, among other things, closing stock prices of the selected companies and TD AMERITRADE on January 6, 2009 as a multiple of latest 12 months earnings per share, or EPS, and calendar years 2008 and 2009 estimated EPS. UBS then compared these multiples derived for the selected companies and TD AMERITRADE with corresponding multiples implied for thinkorswim based both on the closing price of thinkorswim common stock on January 6, 2009 and the implied value of the per share merger consideration. Financial data for the selected companies and TD AMERITRADE were based on publicly available research analysts’ consensus estimates, public filings and other publicly available information. Estimated financial data for thinkorswim were based both on internal estimates of thinkorswim’s management, referred to as “thinkorswim Management Estimates,” and publicly available research analysts’ consensus estimates, referred to as “thinkorswim Wall Street Consensus Estimates.” This analysis indicated the following implied multiples for each of the selected eBrokers, as compared to corresponding multiples implied for thinkorswim, and also indicated the following implied mean multiples for the other selected companies referred to above (implied multiples for E*TRADE Financial Corporation were excluded from the calculation of implied mean multiples for the other selected companies reflected in the table below since multiples for E*TRADE Financial Corporation were negative for two of the three periods observed) as well as the following implied multiples for TD AMERITRADE:

 

 

thinkorswim Selected Transactions Analysis.  UBS reviewed transaction values in the following 15 selected transactions. These transactions were selected because they involved acquired companies or businesses in the online brokerage industry, which is the industry in which thinkorswim operates:

 

 

UBS reviewed transaction values in the selected transactions, calculated as purchase price paid for the target company’s equity, plus debt at book value, preferred stock at liquidation value and minority interests at book value, less cash and cash equivalents, as a multiple of number of core accounts as of the most recent completed accounting period prior to public announcement of the relevant transaction. UBS also reviewed purchase prices paid in the selected transactions for the target company’s equity as a multiple of, to the extent publicly available, latest twelve months net income and forward twelve months estimated net income. UBS then compared these multiples derived for the selected transactions with corresponding multiples implied for thinkorswim based on the implied value of the per share merger consideration. Multiples for the selected transactions were based on publicly available information at the time of announcement of the relevant transaction. Estimated financial data for thinkorswim were based both on thinkorswim Management Estimates and thinkorswim Wall Street Consensus Estimates. This analysis indicated the following implied high, mean, median and low multiples for the selected transactions, as compared to corresponding multiples implied for thinkorswim (net income multiples for the E*TRADE Group, Inc./Web Street, Inc. transaction were negative and therefore excluded from the calculation of high, mean, median and low multiples reflected in the table below):

 

 

thinkorswim Discounted Cash Flow Analysis.  UBS performed a discounted cash flow analysis of thinkorswim using financial forecasts and estimates relating to thinkorswim prepared by thinkorswim’s management. UBS calculated a range of implied present values (as of December 31, 2008) of the standalone after-tax levered free cash flows that thinkorswim was forecasted to generate from January 1, 2009 until December 31, 2013 and of terminal values for thinkorswim based on thinkorswim’s calendar year 2013 estimated normalized net income (normalized for the purpose of calculating terminal value by reducing thinkorswim’s estimated depreciation and amortization expense for calendar year 2013 to an amount equal to thinkorswim’s estimated capital expenditures for that period). Implied terminal values were derived by applying a range of net income multiples of 8.0x to 11.0x. Present values of cash flows and terminal values were calculated using discount rates ranging from 14.0% to 18.0%. The discounted cash flow analysis resulted in a range of implied present values of approximately $5.92 to $8.33 per share of thinkorswim common stock, as compared to the implied value of the per share merger consideration of $8.98.

 

TD AMERITRADE Financial Analyses

 

TD AMERITRADE Selected Companies Analysis.  UBS compared selected financial and stock market data of TD AMERITRADE with corresponding data of the following five publicly traded companies in the online brokerage industry, which is the industry in which TD AMERITRADE operates. Two of these companies, referred to as the selected diversified eBrokers, were selected because they are financial services companies engaged, as is TD AMERITRADE, in multiple businesses, including online brokerage services, and three of these companies, referred to as the other selected companies, were selected because they provide online brokerage services even though they provide less diversified services than TD AMERITRADE:

 

 

UBS reviewed, among other things, closing stock prices of the selected companies on January 6, 2009 as a multiple of latest twelve months EPS and calendar years 2008 and 2009 estimated EPS. UBS then compared these multiples derived for the selected companies with corresponding multiples implied for TD AMERITRADE based on the closing price of TD AMERITRADE common stock on January 6, 2009. Financial data for the selected companies and TD AMERITRADE were based on publicly available research analysts’ consensus estimates, public filings and other publicly available information. This analysis indicated the following implied multiples for each of the selected diversified eBrokers (calendar years 2008 and 2009 estimated EPS multiples for E*TRADE Financial Corporation were negative and therefore considered not meaningful, or “nm”), as compared to corresponding multiples implied for TD AMERITRADE, and also indicated the following implied mean and median multiples for the other selected companies referred to above:

 

 

 

TD AMERITRADE Discounted Cash Flow Analysis.  UBS performed a discounted cash flow analysis of TD AMERITRADE using financial forecasts and estimates relating to TD AMERITRADE prepared by TD AMERITRADE’s management. UBS calculated a range of implied present values (as of December 31, 2008) of the standalone after-tax levered free cash flows that TD AMERITRADE was forecasted to generate from January 1, 2009 until September 30, 2013 and of terminal values for TD AMERITRADE based on TD AMERITRADE’s fiscal year 2013 estimated normalized net income (normalized for the purpose of calculating terminal value by reducing TD AMERITRADE’s estimated depreciation and amortization expense for fiscal year 2013 to an amount equal to TD AMERITRADE’s estimated capital expenditures for that period). Implied terminal values were derived by applying a range of net income multiples of 11.0x to 14.0x. Present values of cash flows and terminal values were calculated using discount rates ranging from 13.0% to 17.0%. The discounted cash flow analysis resulted in a range of implied present values of approximately $13.19 to $17.83 per share of TD AMERITRADE common stock, as compared to the closing price of TD AMERITRADE common stock on January 6, 2009 of $14.16.

 

Miscellaneous

 

UBS was engaged by thinkorswim in connection with the transaction for purposes of rendering an opinion and thinkorswim agreed to pay UBS an aggregate fee of $1.5 million in connection with its opinion. No portion of UBS’ fee is contingent upon completion of the merger. In addition, thinkorswim agreed to reimburse UBS for its reasonable expenses, including fees, disbursements and other charges of counsel, and to indemnify UBS and related parties against liabilities, including liabilities under federal securities laws, relating to, or arising out of, its engagement.

 

As of the date of UBS’ opinion, UBS or an affiliate was a participant in credit facilities of TD AMERITRADE for which it received and, as of the date of UBS’ opinion, continued to receive fees and interest payments. In the ordinary course of business, UBS and its affiliates may hold or trade, for their own accounts and the accounts of their customers, securities of thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE and, accordingly, may at any time hold a long or short position in such securities. thinkorswim selected UBS in connection with the transaction because UBS is an internationally recognized investment banking firm with substantial experience in similar transactions. UBS is regularly engaged in the valuation of businesses and their securities in connection with mergers and acquisitions, leveraged buyouts, negotiated underwritings, competitive bids, secondary distributions of listed and unlisted securities and private placements.

 

In considering the recommendation of the thinkorswim board of directors that you vote to approve the merger proposal, you should be aware that some of thinkorswim’s executive officers and directors have financial interests in the merger that are different from, or in addition to, those of thinkorswim’s stockholders generally. The members of thinkorswim’s board of directors were aware of and considered these interests, among other matters, in evaluating and negotiating the merger agreement, and in recommending to the stockholders that the merger agreement be approved and adopted. For purposes of all of the thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE agreements and plans described below, the completion of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement will constitute a change in control.

Equity Compensation Awards

 

The merger agreement provides that, upon completion of the merger, each thinkorswim option, thinkorswim restricted stock unit and unvested share of thinkorswim restricted stock will be converted, based on the option exchange ratio, on the same terms into an option, restricted stock unit or share of restricted stock of TD AMERITRADE common stock and each then-issued and outstanding share of restricted stock that, as of or resulting from the completion of the merger, is or becomes vested will represent the right to receive the merger consideration. Please see “thinkorswim Proposal 1 — The Merger — The Merger Agreement — Treatment of thinkorswim Stock Options and Other Equity-Based Awards” beginning on page 48 for a detailed discussion of the option exchange ratio.

 

Pursuant to agreements with Mr. Barba, Ms. Ida Kane and Mr. Paul Helbling, upon a change in control of thinkorswim, their unvested thinkorswim options will become fully vested and exercisable. Pursuant to agreements with Mr. Sosnoff and Mr. Scott Sheridan, upon a change in control of thinkorswim, certain of their unvested thinkorswim options would have become vested in full, but for the waiver described below. Pursuant to agreements with Mr. Barba, Ms. Kane and Mr. Helbling, upon a change in control of thinkorswim, their unvested shares of thinkorswim restricted stock will vest in full, except as otherwise described below. The following table identifies, for each of Mr. Barba, Ms. Kane and Mr. Helbling (A) the number of unvested options to acquire shares of thinkorswim common stock (at exercise prices ranging from $5.18 to $13.79) that would vest upon completion of the merger as a result of the transactions contemplated and (B) the number of shares of unvested thinkorswim restricted stock (not including the shares of thinkorswim restricted stock described below) that would vest upon completion of the merger as a result of the transactions contemplated, in each case based on thinkorswim equity compensation holdings as of January 8, 2009, and assuming a closing date of June 30, 2009:

 

 

Pursuant to an agreement with Peter Santori, upon a voluntary resignation within 180 days of a change in control of thinkorswim or in the event his employment is terminated without cause, unvested stock options and shares of restricted stock held by Mr. Santori will vest in full. Based on thinkorswim equity compensation holdings as of January 8, 2009, and assuming a closing date of June 30, 2009, upon completion of the merger, (A) the number of unvested options to acquire shares of thinkorswim common stock (at an exercise price of $8.11) held by Mr. Santori that would vest is 15,000 and (B) the number of unvested shares of restricted stock in respect of thinkorswim common stock held by Mr. Santori that would vest is 15,000. Mr. Santori also received, as part of his 2008 compensation, a grant of 3,850 shares of restricted stock that will vest as a result of the change in control only if his employment is terminated without cause following the change in control (and not if he voluntarily resigns).

 

As part of their 2008 compensation, Mr. Barba, Ms. Kane and Mr. Helbling received grants of 115,000, 35,000 and 15,500 shares of thinkorswim restricted stock respectively on January 14, 2009. In each case, 50% of the grant vests on the first anniversary of the date of grant and the remaining 50% vests on the second anniversary of the date of grant. However, for Mr. Barba, this grant of shares of thinkorswim restricted stock will vest 100% on the six-month anniversary of a change in control so long as he remains employed until such date, or upon termination by thinkorswim (or, following completion of the merger, by TD AMERITRADE) without cause, due to his death or disability or by constructive termination (as defined in his employment agreement). For Ms. Kane and Mr. Helbling, this grant of shares of restricted stock will vest 100% on the two-month anniversary of a change in control unless, in each case, they are terminated without cause, die or become disabled prior thereto (in which case the awards will vest as of such termination, death or disability).

thinkorswim also maintains agreements with Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Sosnoff pursuant to which their respective unvested shares of thinkorswim restricted stock (including the grant made to each of them in January 2009 as part of their 2008 compensation) would vest in full upon a termination of employment with thinkorswim in connection with a change in control of thinkorswim. However, Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Sosnoff have entered into employment agreements with TD AMERITRADE which will become effective as of the completion of the merger. Pursuant to these agreements with TD AMERITRADE, which will supersede and replace all other agreements, including the employment agreements with thinkorswim, Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Sosnoff have agreed to waive their right to receive any payments or benefits, including but not limited to any vesting acceleration of outstanding thinkorswim options or thinkorswim restricted stock awards granted under the thinkorswim equity plans. The employment agreements with TD AMERITRADE, which are described in further detail below, generally provide for certain vesting acceleration of certain equity awards granted by TD AMERITRADE under the TD AMERITRADE equity plans in connection with a termination of employment without cause or for good reason (as such terms are defined in the employment agreements). These agreements do not provide for vesting acceleration of any thinkorswim options or thinkorswim restricted stock awards held by Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Sosnoff.

 

Pursuant to agreements with the non-employee directors of thinkorswim, namely Hans von Meiss, Douglas T. Tansill, F. Warren McFarlan and Lisa Polsky, their awards of thinkorswim restricted stock will vest as a result of the consummation of the transaction. Upon consummation of the merger, by operation of the merger agreement, the non-employee directors of thinkorswim will cease to be directors and their unvested shares of thinkorswim restricted stock will vest in full. The following table identifies, for each of Mr. von Meiss, Mr. Tansill, Mr. McFarlan and Ms. Polsky, the number of shares of unvested thinkorswim restricted stock that would vest upon completion of the merger as a result of the transactions contemplated, based on thinkorswim equity compensation holdings as of January 8, 2009, and assuming a closing date of June 30, 2009:

 

 

In addition, Mr. von Meiss, Mr. Tansill, Mr. McFarlan and Ms. Polsky each received a grant of 7,000 shares of thinkorswim restricted stock on January 14, 2009. These shares of thinkorswim restricted stock will fully vest upon completion of the merger as a result of their resignation from the board pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement.

 

Option Exchange

 

Under the terms of the merger agreement, thinkorswim has commenced offer to certain holders of underwater options outstanding under thinkorswim option plans, to be completed immediately prior to the completion of the merger, whereby the holder may agree to the cancellation of all such holder’s underwater options in exchange for the grant by thinkorswim of an award of restricted stock units. Certain thinkorswim executive offices holding underwater options are eligible to participate in the exchange program. The terms of the exchange program are described in further detail in “thinkorswim Proposal 3 — Option Exchange” beginning on page 77 and “thinkorswim Proposal 4 — Amendment of the Second Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Plan” beginning on page 83. The acceptance of thinkorswim options tendered in, and completion by thinkorswim of, this offer will only occur if the merger is consummated. At the consummation of the merger, each thinkorswim restricted stock unit granted pursuant to the exchange program described above that is outstanding immediately prior to such consummation will be assumed by TD AMERITRADE and converted into a right to receive TD AMERITRADE common stock upon the vesting of such unit. Each assumed restricted stock unit will otherwise be subject to the same terms and conditions (including as to vesting) as

were applicable under the respective thinkorswim restricted stock unit immediately prior to the consummation of the merger.

 

Protection of thinkorswim Directors and Officers Against Claims

 

TD AMERITRADE has agreed to cause the surviving corporation in the merger to indemnify and hold harmless each present and former director and officer of thinkorswim from liability for matters arising at or prior to the completion of the merger to the fullest extent provided by applicable law. TD AMERITRADE also has agreed that it will maintain in place existing indemnification and exculpation rights in favor of thinkorswim directors, officers and employees for six years after the merger and that it will enter into a policy of directors’ and officers’ liability insurance coverage providing at least equivalent insurance coverage of thinkorswim directors and officers, for six years following completion of the merger, except that TD AMERITRADE is not required to incur premium expense in excess of $1,500,000.

 

Certain Employment Agreements

 

Each of Ms. Kane and Mr. Santori are party to an employment agreement that provides that, in the event that their employment is terminated by thinkorswim or its successor without cause, or upon a voluntary resignation by Ms. Kane (provided she no longer reports to the then current chief executive officer of thinkorswim) or Mr. Santori within one hundred eighty days, following a change in control of thinkorswim, they would be entitled to receive cash severance in an amount equal to twelve months base salary. In addition, Ms. Kane would be entitled to receive up to twelve months continued health coverage. In the event that Ms. Kane’s employment is terminated without cause (not within one hundred eighty days following a change in control), she would receive cash severance in an amount equal to six months base salary and up to six months of company-paid continued health care coverage. In the event that Mr. Santori’s employment is terminated without cause (not within one hundred eighty days following a change in control), he would receive cash severance in an amount equal to six months base salary and full vesting of his stock options and restricted stock.

 

In addition, Mr. Helbling is party to a letter agreement that provides that, in the event his employment is terminated without cause within one hundred eighty days of a change in control of thinkorswim, he would receive cash severance in an amount equal to twelve months base salary and up to twelve months of company-paid continued health coverage.

 

Employment Arrangements with TD AMERITRADE

 

In connection with the merger, TD AMERITRADE has entered into employment agreements with Mr. Sosnoff and Mr. Sheridan and has entered into an employment agreement amendment with Mr. Barba, each of which is conditioned and becomes effective upon completion of the merger. It is possible that other members of thinkorswim’s current management team will enter into arrangements with TD AMERITRADE or its affiliates, after the date of this proxy statement/prospectus. Any new arrangements are currently expected to be entered into at or prior to completion of the merger and would not become effective until after the merger is completed.

 

Barba Employment Agreement Amendment.  Mr. Barba has entered into an employment agreement amendment with TD AMERITRADE pursuant to which TD AMERITRADE will assume his existing employment agreement with thinkorswim and change his role to that of Integration Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer, reporting to the Chief Executive Officer of TD AMERITRADE, for the purpose of assisting in the integration of thinkorswim’s operations into those of TD AMERITRADE. The term of Mr. Barba’s employment in this capacity under the agreement is six months from the date of consummation of the merger. At that time, Mr. Barba will cease to be employed with TD AMERITRADE or its subsidiaries, and will be entitled to severance as provided in his employment agreement. Specifically, Mr. Barba would be entitled to receive, in addition to accrued but unpaid base salary and benefits as provided in his employment agreement, (A) a lump sum payment, within thirty days of termination, of cash severance in an amount equal to two years of (i) his base salary and (ii) the greater of his target bonus (equal to 100% of his base salary) for the year of termination or the actual bonus earned by him in the year immediately preceding such termination, (B) an additional cash

severance payment in an amount equal to a pro rata portion of his target bonus for the year of termination, (C) two years of continued coverage under certain health and welfare plans, unless such continued coverage is not permissible (in which case Mr. Barba will be entitled to alternative coverage for such period), and (D) full vesting acceleration of all outstanding stock options and shares of restricted stock then held by him. In addition, pursuant to Mr. Barba’s employment agreement amendment, upon termination without cause or constructive termination (as defined in his employment agreement), Mr. Barba’s vested, exercisable options will remain exercisable until the earlier of one year after his termination or the expiration of the original option term.

 

The provisions of Mr. Barba’s employment agreement with thinkorswim regarding severance or other payments or benefits continue to govern in all other material respects. In particular, in the event that Mr. Barba would become subject to the excise tax under Section 4999 of the Code, his employment agreement provides that Mr. Barba will be entitled to receive an amount such that, after payment by Mr. Barba of all taxes imposed upon the amounts payable in accordance with the employment agreement’s severance provisions, including but not limited to income tax and the Section 4999 excise tax, Mr. Barba will retain an amount equal to the amount of such excise tax on the payments or benefits.

 

Pursuant to the employment agreement amendment, Mr. Barba is bound by a lock-up arrangement pursuant to which he is prohibited from directly or indirectly selling, offering, contracting for or granting any option to sell, pledge, swap, hedge, transfer or otherwise dispose of any shares issued to him as consideration in the merger (totaling 1,366,065 shares, assuming the exercise by Mr. Barba of all outstanding options prior to the consummation of the merger) or from publicly announcing an intention to do so for a period commencing on the consummation of the merger and ending, for 50% of the shares he receives as merger consideration, after the six-month anniversary of the consummation of the merger and, for the remaining 50% of the shares he receives as merger consideration, after the first anniversary of the consummation of the merger. This lock-up will cease to apply in the event of Mr. Barba’s death.

 

Mr. Barba will not be entitled to any additional compensation or perquisites while he serves in the position of Integration Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer.

 

Sheridan and Sosnoff Employment Agreement.  The employment agreements between each of Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Sosnoff and TD AMERITRADE provide that, in the event of a termination of employment (A) by TD AMERITRADE without cause or by Mr. Sheridan or Mr. Sosnoff for good reason (as each term is defined in the agreement) or (B) upon the expiration of the initial term of these agreements because TD AMERITRADE provided written notice of non-renewal, the employee will become entitled to certain payments and benefits under the agreement, including a severance payment of $600,000, as well as an additional severance payment determined by pro-rating the then-current year’s annual incentive target to the date of termination. In addition, Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Sosnoff would be entitled to receive (A) full vesting of all time-based restricted share units granted under TD AMERITRADE’s long term incentive plan that would have become vested within twelve months of the end of the calendar year of such termination, (B) vesting of that portion of the performance-based restricted share units granted under TD AMERITRADE’s long-term incentive plan that would vest during the twelve-month period following the end of the calendar year in which such termination occurs, depending upon the achievement of the applicable performance criteria, and (C) company-paid COBRA coverage under TD AMERITRADE’s group medical and dental plans for a period of up to twelve months following the date of termination. The receipt of severance is subject to each employee executing and not revoking a separation and release of claims agreement and complying with the non-solicitation, non-competition and non-disparagement provisions of the employment agreement during employment with TD AMERITRADE and for a certain period of time following termination. The initial term of these agreements is three years following completion of the merger, subject to an automatic one-year renewal unless either party delivers written notice of non-renewal prior to the expiration of the initial term.

 

Subject to obtaining approval by the compensation committee of TD AMERITRADE’s board of directors, each of Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Sosnoff will receive a special award upon the consummation of the merger of a stock option to purchase 600,000 shares of common stock of TD AMERITRADE. Additionally, each of Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Sosnoff will be eligible to receive, pursuant to the terms of TD AMERITRADE’s long term incentive program, an annual equity award with a grant-date value of approximately $400,000, and an

annual cash bonus with a target of $400,000, for each full fiscal year of employment with TD AMERITRADE. The employment agreements entitle each of Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Sosnoff to an annual base salary of $200,000. While it is not anticipated that any of the current thinkorswim directors will serve on the thinkorswim board following completion of the merger, Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Sosnoff are obligated, under the employment agreements that will become effective upon completion of the merger, to serve, without additional compensation, as a director of a TD AMERITRADE subsidiary, if requested by TD AMERITRADE.

 

Pursuant to the employment agreement, each of Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Sosnoff is bound by a lock-up arrangement pursuant to which he is prohibited from directly or indirectly selling, offering, contracting for or granting any option to sell, pledge, swap, hedge, transfer or otherwise disposing of 1,000,000 of the shares issued to him as consideration in the merger or from publicly announcing an intention to do so for a period commencing on the consummation of the merger and ending on the second anniversary of the consummation of the merger. This lock-up will cease to apply in the event that Mr. Sheridan’s or Mr. Sosnoff’s employment with TD AMERITRADE is terminated by TD AMERITRADE without cause or by Mr. Sheridan or Mr. Sosnoff with good reason during the stock lock-up period.

 

The following table identifies, for each of Mr. Barba, Ms. Kane, Mr. Helbling, Mr. Santori, Mr. Sheridan and Mr. Sosnoff, the estimated values of the (A) cash severance payments and (B) continued benefit coverage to which such executive will be entitled pursuant to the agreement described above, assuming that the executive’s employment is terminated by TD AMERITRADE for reasons other than cause, death or disability, or where applicable, the executive resigns voluntarily, for good reason, due to constructive termination or upon providing services for a specified period after consummation of the merger, based on the terms of the employment agreements as described above.

 

 

 

 

The TD AMERITRADE board of directors unanimously approved the merger agreement at a special meeting held on January 6, 2009, and determined that the merger agreement and the merger are in the best interests of TD AMERITRADE and its stockholders. In reaching this decision, the TD AMERITRADE board considered the financial performance and condition, business operations and prospects of each of TD AMERITRADE, thinkorswim and the combined company, the terms and conditions of the merger agreement and the ancillary documents, including the implied thirty and ninety day premiums based on the agreed merger consideration, the results of the due diligence investigation conducted by TD AMERITRADE’s management, accountants and legal counsel, and the analysis of TD AMERITRADE’s legal and financial advisors.

The TD AMERITRADE board of directors also considered a number of potential benefits of the merger, including those listed below:

 

 

The TD AMERITRADE board of directors also considered a number of potentially negative factors, including those listed below:

 

 

The foregoing list comprises the material factors considered by the TD AMERITRADE board of directors in its consideration of the merger. In view of the variety of factors and information considered, the TD AMERITRADE board of directors did not find it practicable to, and did not, make specific assessments of, quantify or otherwise assign relative weights to the specific factors considered in reaching its decision. Rather,

the decision was made after consideration of all of the factors as a whole. In addition, individual members of the TD AMERITRADE board of directors may have given different weight to different factors.

 

Upon completion of the merger, the current directors and officers of TD AMERITRADE are expected to continue in their current positions. Information about the current TD AMERITRADE directors and executive officers can be found in the documents listed under the heading “TD AMERITRADE SEC Filings” in the section entitled “Where You Can Find More Information” beginning on page 88.

 

TD AMERITRADE’s common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “AMTD.” thinkorswim’s common stock trades on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “SWIM.” Upon completion of the merger, thinkorswim common stock will be delisted from the NASDAQ Global Market and deregistered under the Exchange Act. The newly issued TD AMERITRADE common stock issuable pursuant to the merger agreement will be listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market. The shares of TD AMERITRADE common stock to be issued in connection with the merger will be freely transferable under the Securities Act.

 

TD AMERITRADE has not declared or paid regular cash dividends on its common stock. TD AMERITRADE’s credit agreement prohibits the payment of cash dividends to its stockholders. The payment of any future dividends will be at the discretion of TD AMERITRADE’s board of directors, subject to the provisions of its credit agreement, and will depend upon a number of factors, including future earnings, the success of TD AMERITRADE’s business activities, capital requirements, the general financial condition and future prospects of TD AMERITRADE’s business, general business conditions and such other factors as TD AMERITRADE’s board of directors may deem relevant.

 

Under Section 262 of the DGCL, any holder of thinkorswim common stock who does not wish to accept the merger consideration may elect to exercise appraisal rights in lieu of receiving the merger consideration. A stockholder who exercises appraisal rights may petition the Delaware Court of Chancery to determine the “fair value” of his, her or its shares, exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the first-step merger, and receive payment of fair value in cash, together with interest, if any. However, the stockholder must comply with the provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL.

 

The following discussion is a summary of the law pertaining to appraisal rights under the DGCL. The full text of Section 262 of the DGCL is attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix D. All references in Section 262 of the DGCL and in this summary to a “stockholder” are to the record holder of the shares of thinkorswim common stock who exercises appraisal rights.

 

Under Section 262 of the DGCL, when a merger is submitted for approval at a meeting of stockholders, as in the case of the merger agreement, the corporation, not less than twenty days prior to the meeting, must notify each of its stockholders entitled to appraisal rights that appraisal rights are available and include in the notice a copy of Section 262 of the DGCL. This proxy statement/prospectus constitutes such notice, and the applicable statutory provisions are attached to this proxy statement/prospectus as Appendix D. This summary of appraisal rights is not a complete summary of the law pertaining to appraisal rights under the DGCL and is qualified in its entirety by the text of Section 262 of the DGCL attached as Appendix D. Any holder of thinkorswim common stock, who wishes to exercise appraisal rights or who wishes to preserve the right to do so, should review the following discussion and Appendix D carefully. Failure to comply with the procedures of Section 262 of the DGCL in a timely and proper manner will result in the loss of appraisal rights. If you lose your appraisal rights, you will be entitled to receive the merger consideration described in the merger agreement.

Stockholders wishing to exercise the right to seek an appraisal of their shares must do ALL of the following:

 

 

Voting, in person or by proxy, against, abstaining from voting on or failing to vote on the proposal to adopt and approve the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby will not constitute a written demand for appraisal as required by Section 262 of the DGCL. The written demand for appraisal must be in addition to and separate from any proxy or vote.

 

Only a holder of record of shares of thinkorswim common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the merger may assert appraisal rights for the shares of stock registered in that holder’s name. A demand for appraisal must be executed by or on behalf of the stockholder of record, fully and correctly, as the stockholder’s name appears on the stock certificates. The demand must reasonably inform thinkorswim of the identity of the stockholder and that the stockholder intends to demand appraisal of his, her or its common stock. STOCKHOLDERS WHO HOLD THEIR SHARES IN BROKERAGE ACCOUNTS OR OTHER NOMINEE FORMS, AND WHO WISH TO EXERCISE APPRAISAL RIGHTS, SHOULD CONSULT WITH THEIR BROKERS TO DETERMINE THE APPROPRIATE PROCEDURES FOR THE NOMINEE HOLDER TO MAKE A DEMAND FOR APPRAISAL OF THOSE SHARES. A PERSON HAVING A BENEFICIAL INTEREST IN SHARES HELD OF RECORD IN THE NAME OF ANOTHER PERSON, SUCH AS A BROKER OR NOMINEE, MUST ACT PROMPTLY TO CAUSE THE RECORD HOLDER TO FOLLOW PROPERLY AND IN A TIMELY MANNER THE STEPS NECESSARY TO PERFECT APPRAISAL RIGHTS.

 

A stockholder who elects to exercise appraisal rights under Section 262 of the DGCL should mail or deliver a written demand to:

 

thinkorswim Group Inc.
13947 South Minuteman Drive
Draper, Utah 84020
Attention: Corporate Secretary

 

If the merger is completed, thinkorswim will give written notice of the effective time of the merger within ten days after such effective time to each former thinkorswim stockholder who did not vote in favor of the merger agreement and who made a written demand for appraisal in accordance with Section 262 of the DGCL. Within one hundred twenty days after the effective time of the merger, but not later, either the surviving company or any dissenting stockholder who has complied with the requirements of Section 262 of the DGCL may file a petition in the Delaware Court of Chancery demanding a determination of the value of the shares of thinkorswim common stock held by all dissenting stockholders. The surviving company is under no obligation to file any petition and has no intention of doing so. Stockholders who desire to have their shares appraised should initiate any petitions necessary for the perfection of their appraisal rights within the time periods and in the manner prescribed in Section 262 of the DGCL.

Within one hundred twenty days after the effective time of the first-step merger, any stockholder who, to that point in time, has complied with the provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL, may receive from the surviving company, upon written request, a statement setting forth the aggregate number of shares not voted in favor of the merger agreement and with respect to which thinkorswim has received demands for appraisal, and the aggregate number of holders of those shares. The surviving company must mail this statement to the stockholder within the later of ten days of receipt of the request or ten days after expiration of the period for delivery of demands for appraisal.

 

If any party files a petition for appraisal in a timely manner, the Delaware Court of Chancery will determine which stockholders are entitled to appraisal rights and may require the stockholders demanding appraisal who hold certificated shares to submit their stock certificates to the court for notation of the pendency of the appraisal proceedings and any stockholder who fails to comply with such direction may be dismissed from such proceedings. The Delaware Court of Chancery will thereafter determine the fair value of the shares of thinkorswim common stock held by dissenting stockholders, exclusive of any element of value arising from the accomplishment or expectation of the merger, but together with interest, if any, to be paid on the amount determined to be fair value.

 

In determining the fair value, the Delaware Court of Chancery will take into account all relevant factors. The Delaware Supreme Court has stated that “proof of value by any techniques or methods that are generally considered acceptable in the financial community and otherwise admissible in court” should be considered in the appraisal proceedings. In addition, Delaware courts have decided that the statutory appraisal remedy, in cases of unfair dealing, may or may not be a dissenter’s exclusive remedy. If no party files a petition for appraisal in a timely manner, then stockholders will lose the right to an appraisal, and will instead receive the merger consideration described in the merger agreement. The fair value of their shares as determined under Section 262 of the DGCL could be greater than, the same as, or less than the merger consideration. An opinion of an investment banking firm as to the fairness from a financial point of view of the consideration payable in a merger is not an opinion as to, and does not in any manner address, fair value under Section 262 of the DGCL.

 

The Delaware Court of Chancery will determine the costs of the appraisal proceeding and will allocate those costs to the parties as the Delaware Court of Chancery determines to be equitable under the circumstances. Upon application of a stockholder, the Delaware Court of Chancery may order all or a portion of the expenses incurred by any stockholder in connection with the appraisal proceeding, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and the fees and expenses of experts, to be charged pro rata against the value of all shares entitled to appraisal.

 

Any stockholder who has duly demanded an appraisal in compliance with Section 262 of the DGCL may not, after the effective time of the merger, vote the shares subject to the demand for any purpose or receive any dividends or other distributions on those shares, except dividends or other distributions payable to holders of record of shares as of a record date prior to the effective time of the merger.

 

Any stockholder may withdraw a demand for appraisal and accept the merger consideration by delivering a written withdrawal of the demand for appraisal to the surviving company, except that any attempt to withdraw made more than sixty days after the effective time of the merger will require written approval of the surviving company, and no appraisal proceeding in the Delaware Court of Chancery will be dismissed as to any stockholder without the approval of the Delaware Court of Chancery, and may be conditioned on such terms as the Delaware Court of Chancery deems just. If the stockholder fails to perfect, successfully withdraws or loses the appraisal right, the stockholder’s shares will be converted into the right to receive the merger consideration.

 

Failure to follow the steps required by Section 262 of the DGCL for perfecting appraisal rights may result in the loss of appraisal rights. In that event, you will be entitled to receive the consideration for your dissenting shares in accordance with the merger agreement. In view of the complexity of the provisions of Section 262 of the DGCL, if you are a thinkorswim stockholder and are considering exercising your appraisal rights under the DGCL, you should consult your own legal advisor.

 

TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim have agreed to use reasonable best efforts to obtain as promptly as practicable all regulatory approvals required to complete the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. These approvals include approval from or notices to foreign and state securities authorities, various other federal, state and foreign antitrust and regulatory authorities and self-regulatory organizations. TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim have completed, or will complete, the filing of applications and notifications to obtain the required regulatory approvals.

 

Department of Justice/Federal Trade Commission.  The merger is subject to review by the Department of Justice, referred to as the DOJ, and the Federal Trade Commission, referred to as the FTC. The Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, referred to as the HSR Act, and the related rules prohibit the completion of transactions such as the merger unless the parties notify the FTC and the DOJ in advance. TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim filed the requisite HSR Act notification forms on January 26, 2009 and January 14, 2009, respectively. The HSR Act further provides that a transaction or portion of a transaction that is notifiable under the HSR Act, such as the merger, may not be consummated until the expiration of a thirty calendar-day waiting period, or the early termination of that waiting period, following the later of the parties’ filing of their respective HSR Act notification forms. The waiting period under the HSR Act expired on February 25, 2009.

 

At any time before or after the acquisition is completed, either the DOJ or FTC could take action under the antitrust laws in opposition to the merger, including seeking to enjoin the acquisition or seeking divestiture of substantial assets of TD AMERITRADE or thinkorswim or their subsidiaries. Private parties also may seek to take legal action under the antitrust laws under some circumstances. Based upon an examination of information available relating to the businesses in which the companies are engaged, TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim believe that the completion of the merger will not violate U.S. antitrust laws. However, TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim can give no assurance that a challenge to the merger on antitrust grounds will not be made, or, if such a challenge is made, that TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim will prevail.

 

In addition, the merger may be reviewed by the state attorneys general in the various states in which TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim operate. While TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim believe there are substantial arguments to the contrary, these authorities may claim that there is authority, under the applicable state and federal antitrust laws and regulations, to investigate and/or disapprove the merger under the circumstances and based upon the review set forth in applicable state laws and regulations. There can be no assurance that one or more state attorneys general will not attempt to file an antitrust action to challenge the merger or that, if a challenge is made, TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim will prevail.

 

Other Requisite Approvals, Notices, and Consents.  Applications and notices are being filed with various regulatory authorities and self-regulatory organizations in connection with the merger, including applications and notices in connection with the indirect change in control, as a result of the merger, of certain subsidiaries directly or indirectly owned by thinkorswim. The indirect change in control of thinkorswim’s broker-dealer subsidiary resulting from the merger is subject to approval by FINRA. TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim have filed and submitted, or will shortly file and submit, all applications and notices required to be submitted to obtain these approvals and provide these notices.

 

Certain Foreign Approvals.  Applications and notices are being filed with various Canadian securities regulators. The Canadian broker-dealer subsidiary of thinkorswim is a member of the Investment Industry Regulatory Organization of Canada, referred to as IIROC. Pursuant to IIROC rules, thinkorswim’s Canadian broker-dealer subsidiary is required to provide notice to IIROC and file for IIROC District Council approval regarding the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement. In addition, thinkorswim’s Canadian broker-dealer subsidiary is registered in all Canadian provinces as an investment dealer (or equivalent). Under provincial securities laws and regulations, thinkorswim’s Canadian broker-dealer subsidiary and TD AMERITRADE are required to provide notice to, or obtain approval from, a number of the provincial securities commissions, including the Ontario Securities Commission.

Timing.  TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim cannot assure you that all of the regulatory approvals described above will be obtained and, if obtained, TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim cannot assure you as to the timing of any approvals, the ability to obtain the approvals on satisfactory terms or the absence of any litigation challenging such approvals. TD AMERITRADE also cannot assure you that the DOJ, the FTC or any state attorney general will not attempt to challenge the merger on antitrust grounds, and, if such a challenge is made, TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim cannot assure you as to its result.

 

TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim believe that the merger does not raise substantial antitrust or other significant regulatory concerns and that they will be able to obtain all requisite regulatory approvals on a timely basis without the imposition of any condition that would have a material adverse effect on TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim. The parties’ obligation to complete the merger is conditioned upon the expiration or termination of all applicable waiting periods under the HSR Act, and, subject to certain exceptions, the receipt of all clearances, approvals and consents required to be obtained in connection with the merger under all applicable foreign laws governing antitrust or unfair competition, and approval by FINRA, IIROC and certain Canadian provincial securities regulators of the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement.

 

TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim are not aware of any material governmental approvals or actions that are required for completion of the merger other than those described above. It is presently contemplated that if any such additional governmental approvals or actions are required, those approvals or actions will be sought. There can be no assurance, however, that any additional approvals or actions will be obtained.

 

On January 26 and 27, 2009, two purported class actions lawsuits were filed on behalf of thinkorswim stockholders in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois docketed as Jonathan Simons v. Tom Sosnoff, et al., Case No. 09CH02970, and Jim Burns v. thinkorswim Group Inc., et al., Case No. 09CH03435, referred to as the Illinois complaints, which are filed as exhibits 99.4 and 99.5 of the registration statement of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part. On February 11, 2009, a purported class action lawsuit was filed on behalf of thinkorswim stockholders in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, docketed as James A. Bordeleau v. thinkorswim Group, Inc., et al., referred to herein as the New York complaint. The Illinois complaints name each of the members of the thinkorswim board of directors, thinkorswim, TD AMERITRADE and Merger Sub One as defendants. The New York complaint names each of the members of the thinkorswim board of directors and thinkorswim as defendants. The lawsuits allege, among other things, that the members of the thinkorswim board of directors breached their fiduciary duties to thinkorswim’s stockholders by entering into a merger agreement with TD AMERITRADE for an unfair price and failing to engage in a fair sale process with respect to the merger. They also allege that the thinkorswim directors are attempting to obtain personal financial benefits at the expense of the thinkorswim stockholders. The Illinois complaints further allege that TD AMERITRADE and Merger Sub One aided and abetted the directors of thinkorswim in the alleged breaches of their fiduciary duties. The plaintiffs are seeking relief that includes, among other things, preliminary and permanent injunctions prohibiting consummation of the merger, rescission or damages if the merger is consummated prior to entry of the court’s final judgment and payment of the plaintiff’s costs and expenses.

 

The Illinois complaints were consolidated by court order dated February 25, 2009. On March 5, 2009, plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended complaint, which is filed as exhibit 99.6 of this registration statement of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part. The consolidated amended complaint includes additional allegations that this proxy statement/prospectus does not disclose certain information. The plaintiff in the New York complaint filed an amended complaint on March 5, 2009, which is filed as exhibit 99.7 of the registration statement of which this proxy statement/prospectus forms a part. The amended complaint includes additional allegations that this proxy statement/prospectus does not disclose certain information. The defendants have filed a motion to dismiss or stay the New York complaint on the ground that the claims asserted are the subject of the prior, consolidated class action filed in the Illinois court. thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE believe the lawsuits to be without merit, and thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE intend to

vigorously contest the plaintiffs’ claims. There can be no assurance, however, with regard to the outcome of the lawsuits.

 

The following description describes the material terms of the merger agreement. This description of the merger agreement is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the merger agreement which is attached as Appendix A to this proxy statement/prospectus and is incorporated herein by reference. The merger agreement has been included to provide you with information regarding its terms. TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim encourage you to read the entire merger agreement. The merger agreement is not intended to provide any other factual information about TD AMERITRADE or thinkorswim. Such information can be found elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus and in the other public filings each of TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim makes with the Securities and Exchange Commission, which are available without charge at www.sec.gov.

 

The Merger

 

Each of the thinkorswim board of directors and TD AMERITRADE board of directors has approved the merger agreement, which provides for the merger of Merger Sub One with and into thinkorswim, with thinkorswim, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of TD AMERITRADE, remaining as the “interim” surviving corporation, immediately followed by the merger of the “interim” surviving corporation with and into Merger Sub Two, with Merger Sub Two remaining as the surviving corporation. The first-step merger and the second-step merger are referred to collectively as the merger.

 

Per Share Merger Consideration

 

Each share of thinkorswim common stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the first-step merger will be converted into the right to receive a cash amount of $3.34, without interest and less any required withholding under United States federal, state, local or foreign law, referred to as the per share cash amount, plus 0.3980 of a share of TD AMERITRADE common stock, which, together with the per share cash amount, is referred to as the per share merger consideration. The per share merger consideration is subject to future adjustment for stock splits, recapitalizations, reclassifications or other similar changes, as well as for dividends or distributions in cash by TD AMERITRADE, in each case occurring prior to the completion of the first-step merger.

 

No fractional shares of TD AMERITRADE common stock will be issued in the first-step merger. Instead, each thinkorswim stockholder otherwise entitled to a fraction of a share of TD AMERITRADE common stock (after aggregating all fractional shares of TD AMERITRADE common stock issuable to such stockholder) will be entitled to receive in cash the dollar amount (rounded to the nearest whole cent), determined by multiplying such fraction by the volume-weighted average price (rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a cent) of a share of TD AMERITRADE common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market over the five trading days immediately prior to the date the first-step merger is completed.

 

As a result of the first-step merger, the common stock of Merger Sub One will be converted into common stock of the “interim” surviving corporation. Each share of common stock of the “interim” surviving corporation issued and outstanding immediately prior to the effective time of the second-step merger will be converted into common stock of Merger Sub Two.

 

thinkorswim Stock Options

 

Each outstanding option to acquire thinkorswim common stock granted under thinkorswim’s stock incentive plans that is not cancelled pursuant to the exchange program will be converted automatically at the effective time

of the merger into an option to purchase TD AMERITRADE common stock and will continue to be governed by the terms of the thinkorswim stock plan and related grant agreements under which it was granted, except that:

 

 

Example

 

If the volume-weighted average price for a share of TD AMERITRADE common stock (rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a cent) on the NASDAQ Global Select Market for the trading day immediately prior to the effective time of the merger is $12.79, then the option exchange ratio will be 0.6591 (.3980 + (3.34/12.79)).

 

If a thinkorswim option holder holds an option covering 1,000 shares with an exercise price of $5.00, and such option is assumed by TD AMERITRADE pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement, the option would convert into an option to acquire 659 TD AMERITRADE shares (1,000 x .6591) and have an exercise price of $7.59 per share ($5.00/.6591).

 

thinkorswim Restricted Stock

 

Shares of thinkorswim common stock that remain, as of the effective time of the merger, unvested or subject to a repurchase option, risk of forfeiture or other conditions under any restricted stock purchase agreement or other agreement or arrangement with thinkorswim (taking into account any accelerated vesting or lapse of a repurchase option or risk of forfeiture as a result of the consummation of the merger pursuant to the terms applicable to such award of restricted stock), referred to as restricted stock, will be converted automatically at the effective time of the merger into shares of restricted stock of TD AMERITRADE. The number of shares of restricted stock of TD AMERITRADE to be issued upon conversion of the shares of thinkorswim restricted stock will be equal to the product of (A) the number of shares of thinkorswim restricted common stock, times (B) the option exchange ratio, rounded down to the nearest whole share. The shares of TD AMERITRADE restricted stock will be payable or distributable in accordance with the terms of the agreement, plan or arrangement relating to the restricted stock.

 

thinkorswim Restricted Stock Units

 

Restricted stock units in respect of thinkorswim common stock outstanding immediately prior to the merger will be converted automatically at the effective time of the merger into restricted stock units in respect of shares of TD AMERITRADE common stock. The number of shares of TD AMERITRADE common stock subject to each converted restricted stock unit will be equal to the product of (A) the number of shares of thinkorswim common stock previously subject to the thinkorswim restricted stock unit, times (B) the option exchange ratio, rounded down to the nearest whole share. The TD AMERITRADE restricted stock units will be payable or distributable in accordance with the terms of the agreement, plan or arrangement relating to the restricted share units.

 

Option Exchange for Underwater thinkorswim Stock Options

 

In accordance with the terms of the merger agreement, thinkorswim has proposed an exchange program to all holders of outstanding options to acquire thinkorswim common stock that have an exercise price equal to or

greater than the total value of the per share merger consideration (based on the volume-weighted average price for a share of TD AMERITRADE common stock (rounded to the nearest one-tenth of a cent) on the NASDAQ Global Select Market for the trading day immediately prior to the date the merger is completed), referred to as underwater options. The terms of the exchange program are described in more detail elsewhere in this proxy statement/prospectus. See “thinkorswim’s Proposal 3 — Option Exchange” beginning on page 77 and “thinkorswim Proposal 4 — Amendment to the Second Amended and Restated 2001 Stock Plan” beginning on page 83. Underwater options that are not exchanged for restricted stock units of TD AMERITRADE pursuant to the terms of the exchange program will be assumed by TD AMERITRADE.

 

TD AMERITRADE has agreed to file a registration statement with the SEC on an appropriate form to the extent necessary to register TD AMERITRADE common stock subject to the converted stock options and other equity or equity-based awards.

 

The merger agreement requires the parties to complete the merger after all of the conditions to the completion of the merger contained in the merger agreement are satisfied or waived, including the adoption of the merger agreement by the stockholders of thinkorswim. The first-step merger will become effective upon the filing of a certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, or at such later time as is agreed by TD AMERITRADE, Merger Sub One and thinkorswim and specified in the certificate of merger. The second-step merger will become effective at the time of filing of the certificate of merger with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware. Because the completion of the merger is subject to the receipt of governmental and regulatory approvals and the satisfaction of other conditions, the exact timing of the completion of the merger cannot be predicted.

 

The merger agreement provides that TD AMERITRADE will select a reputable bank or trust company, reasonably acceptable to thinkorswim, to act as the payment and exchange agent. The merger agreement provides that on or prior to the date of completion of the first-step merger, TD AMERITRADE will deposit with the exchange agent a sufficient amount of cash to make payments of the cash amount payable and stock certificates representing the shares of TD AMERITRADE common stock issuable in exchange for shares of thinkorswim common stock and a sufficient amount of cash to make payments in lieu of fractional shares and in respect of dividends or distributions to which holders of thinkorswim common stock are entitled pursuant to the terms of the merger agreement. The exchange agent will be entitled to deduct and withhold from the cash amounts payable to any thinkorswim stockholder the amounts it is required to deduct and withhold under any federal, state, local or foreign tax law. If the exchange agent withholds any amounts, these amounts will be treated for all purposes of the merger as having been paid to the stockholders from whom they were withheld.

 

The merger agreement contemplates that, as promptly as practicable following the completion of the merger, the exchange agent for the merger will mail to each record holder of thinkorswim common stock immediately prior to the completion of the merger a letter of transmittal and instructions for surrendering and exchanging the record holder’s thinkorswim stock certificates. The merger agreement provides that, upon surrender of a thinkorswim common stock certificate for exchange to the exchange agent (or upon receipt of an appropriate agent’s message in the case of book-entry shares), together with a duly signed letter of transmittal, and such other documents as the exchange agent or TD AMERITRADE may reasonably require, the holder of the thinkorswim stock certificate will be entitled to receive the following:

 

 

After the completion of the first-step merger, all holders of certificates representing shares of thinkorswim common stock that were outstanding immediately prior to the completion of the first-step merger will cease to have any rights as stockholders of thinkorswim, other than the right to receive the merger consideration and subject to the rights described under “thinkorswim Proposal 1 — Appraisal Rights.” In addition, no transfer of thinkorswim common stock after the completion of the first-step merger will be registered on the stock transfer books of thinkorswim.

 

If any thinkorswim stock certificate has been lost, stolen or destroyed, TD AMERITRADE may, in its discretion and as a condition to the payment of cash or the issuance of any certificate representing TD AMERITRADE common stock in exchange therefor, require the owner of such certificate to deliver an affidavit claiming such certificate has been lost, stolen or destroyed and deliver a bond as indemnity against any claim that may be made with respect to that certificate against TD AMERITRADE, the surviving corporation or the exchange agent.

 

Stock certificates should not be surrendered for exchange by thinkorswim stockholders before the completion of the first-step merger and should be sent only pursuant to instructions set forth in the letters of transmittal which the merger agreement provides will be mailed to thinkorswim stockholders as promptly as practicable following the completion of the merger. In all cases, the cash payments, certificates representing shares of TD AMERITRADE common stock and cash in lieu of fractional shares will be delivered only in accordance with the procedures set forth in the letter of transmittal.

 

The merger agreement contains customary representations and warranties that TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim made to, and solely for the benefit of, each other. None of the representations and warranties in the merger agreement will survive the completion of the merger. The assertions embodied in those representations and warranties are qualified by information in confidential disclosure schedules that TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim have exchanged in connection with signing the merger agreement. While TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim do not believe that these disclosure schedules contain information securities laws require the parties to publicly disclose other than information that has already been so disclosed, they do contain information that modifies, qualifies and creates exceptions to the representations and warranties set forth in the merger agreement. Accordingly, you should not rely on the representations and warranties as characterizations of the actual state of facts, since they were only made as of the date of the merger agreement and are modified in important part by the underlying disclosure schedules. These disclosure schedules contain information that has been included in the companies’ general prior public disclosures, as well as additional non-public information. Moreover, information concerning the subject matter of the representations and warranties may have changed since the date of the merger agreement, which subsequent information may or may not be fully reflected in the companies’ public disclosures.

 

In the merger agreement, thinkorswim, TD AMERITRADE, Merger Sub One and Merger Sub Two each made representations and warranties relating to, among other things:

 

 

 

In the merger agreement, TD AMERITRADE, Merger Sub One and Merger Sub Two also each made representations and warranties relating to:

 

 

In the merger agreement, thinkorswim also made representations and warranties relating to:

 

 

Several of the representations, warranties, covenants, closing conditions and termination provisions of TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim in the merger agreement use the phrase “material adverse effect.” The merger agreement provides that “material adverse effect” means, with respect to either TD AMERITRADE or thinkorswim, as the case may be, any fact, circumstance, change or effect that, individually or when taken together with all other such facts, circumstances, changes or effects that:

 

 

The merger agreement provides, however, that none of the following will be deemed to constitute, or be taken into account in determining whether there has occurred, a material adverse effect on TD AMERITRADE or thinkorswim, as applicable:

 

 

Interim Conduct of the Business

 

thinkorswim has undertaken customary covenants that place restrictions on it and its subsidiaries until the effective time of the merger. In general, thinkorswim agreed to (1) carry on its business in the ordinary course and in compliance with all applicable laws, (2) take all steps necessary to cause its subsidiary, thinkorswim, Inc., to maintain specified minimum levels of net capital and (3) use commercially reasonable efforts to preserve intact its present business organization, keep available the services of its present officers and employees and preserve its relationships with persons and entities with which it has significant business dealings. thinkorswim further agreed that, except (a) as expressly contemplated or permitted by the merger agreement, (b) as specifically set forth in thinkorswim’s disclosure schedule, (c) as required by applicable law, or (d) with TD AMERITRADE’s prior written consent, thinkorswim will not, and will not permit any of its subsidiaries to, among other things, undertake the following actions:

 

 

 

 

Other Covenants

 

The merger agreement also contains covenants relating to the preparation of this proxy statement/prospectus and the holding of the special meeting of thinkorswim stockholders, access to information of the other company and public announcements with respect to the transactions contemplated by the merger agreement and efforts to coordinate the repayment of thinkorswim indebtedness concurrently with the completion of the merger.

 

thinkorswim has agreed to hold a meeting of its stockholders as promptly as practicable following the date of this proxy statement/prospectus (and, if reasonably practicable, within forty five days following the date of this proxy statement/prospectus) for the purpose of obtaining stockholder approval of the merger proposal, the option exchange proposal and the plan amendment proposal. thinkorswim will use its reasonable best efforts to obtain such approvals. Unless the merger agreement is terminated, thinkorswim has agreed to submit the merger agreement to a stockholder vote even if its board of directors no longer recommends approval of the merger proposal.

 

thinkorswim also has agreed that neither it nor its subsidiaries will, and that they will not authorize or permit their respective directors, officers, or other employees, controlled affiliates or advisors to, directly or indirectly:

 

 

As used in the merger agreement, an “acquisition proposal” means any indication of interest, offer or proposal relating to an acquisition transaction.

 

As used in the merger agreement, “acquisition transaction” means any transaction or series of related transactions (other than a transaction with TD AMERITRADE or its affiliates) involving:

 

 

thinkorswim has also agreed:

 

 

 

Exception to the Limitation on the Negotiation and Discussion by thinkorswim of Other Acquisition Proposals

 

However, prior to obtaining approval of the merger from its stockholders, thinkorswim may engage and participate in discussions and negotiations with respect to an unsolicited, written acquisition proposal, and furnish non-public information regarding thinkorswim to the party making such acquisition proposal if:

 

 

The thinkorswim board of directors has adopted a resolution recommending that the thinkorswim stockholders approve and adopt the merger agreement and the transactions contemplated thereby. Under the merger agreement, the thinkorswim board of directors may not (1) withhold, withdraw, amend or modify, or publicly propose to withhold, withdraw, amend or modify, in a manner adverse to TD AMERITRADE or approval of the merger, its recommendation, or (2) approve, endorse or recommend, or publicly propose to approve, endorse or recommend, any acquisition proposal or acquisition transaction. Any of these actions is referred to as a board recommendation change.

 

Board Recommendation Change for Superior Proposal

 

However, prior to obtaining approval of the merger from the thinkorswim stockholders, the thinkorswim board of directors may make a board recommendation change and terminate the merger agreement (as described in “The Merger Agreement — Termination of the Merger Agreement — thinkorswim’s Termination Rights”) if it receives an unsolicited, written acquisition proposal and, prior to making such board recommendation change:

 

 

 

As used in the merger agreement, “superior proposal” means any unsolicited, bona fide written offer or proposal to acquire 100% of thinkorswim’s outstanding voting securities that thinkorswim’s board of directors determines in good faith, after consultation with its financial advisors and outside legal counsel, is:

 

 

The merger agreement requires the board to take the following factors, in addition to any factors the thinkorswim board of directors determines to be relevant, into account as part of its determination process: (A) all relevant financial considerations, (B) the identity and prior history of the person making such offer or proposal and of its sources of financing, (C) the anticipated timing, conditions and prospects for completion of the transaction contemplated by such offer or proposal, (D) the other terms and conditions of such offer or proposal and their implications on thinkorswim, and (E) any offer capable of acceptance made by TD AMERITRADE in response to such offer or proposal.

 

Board Recommendation Change for Intervening Event

 

Prior to obtaining approval of the merger from thinkorswim stockholders, the thinkorswim board of directors also may make a board recommendation change if a material fact, event, change, development or set of circumstances (other than an acquisition proposal) that was not known by thinkorswim’s board of directors on or prior to January 8, 2009, referred to as an intervening event, occurs and:

 

 

 

TD AMERITRADE has agreed to maintain, for a period of two years after completion of the merger, employee benefit plans and compensation opportunities for employees of thinkorswim and its subsidiaries that are at least as favorable, in the aggregate, as those made available to similarly situated employees of TD AMERITRADE and its subsidiaries, or no less favorable, in the aggregate, than those made available to employees of thinkorswim and its subsidiaries immediately prior to the completion of the merger, or a combination of the foregoing.

 

In addition, TD AMERITRADE has agreed, to the extent any thinkorswim employee becomes eligible to participate in TD AMERITRADE employee benefit plans following the merger:

 

 

TD AMERITRADE has also agreed to honor all existing thinkorswim employment, change in control and severance agreements in accordance with the terms thereof. TD AMERITRADE has the right to amend or terminate thinkorswim employee benefit plans to the extent permitted under the terms of such plans, and has no obligation to continue the employment of any thinkorswim employee for any period following the merger.

 

The merger agreement requires the current rights of the directors and officers of thinkorswim and its subsidiaries to indemnification under these entities’ organizational documents and other disclosed agreements to continue in effect for six years after completion of the merger. The merger agreement also provides that, upon completion of the merger, TD AMERITRADE will cause the surviving corporation to indemnify and hold harmless, and provide advancement of expenses to, all past and present officers and directors of thinkorswim and its subsidiaries against all losses or liabilities incurred in their capacities as such to the fullest extent permitted by applicable laws.

 

The merger agreement requires TD AMERITRADE to obtain a “tail” prepaid directors’ and officers’ liability insurance policy with a claims period of six years after completion of the merger with at least the same coverage and amount and containing terms and conditions that are not less favorable than thinkorswim’s

current policy, with respect to acts or omissions occurring prior to the effective time of the merger, except that TD AMERITRADE is not required to incur premium expense greater than $1,500,000.

 

Conditions to the Obligations of TD AMERITRADE and thinkorswim

 

The respective obligations of thinkorswim and TD AMERITRADE to complete the merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of certain conditions, including:

 

 

Conditions to the Obligations of TD AMERITRADE

 

The merger agreement provides that the obligations of TD AMERITRADE, Merger Sub One and Merger Sub Two to complete the merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of each of the following conditions:

 

 

 

Conditions to the Obligations of thinkorswim

 

The merger agreement provides that the obligations of thinkorswim to complete the merger are subject to the satisfaction or waiver of each of the following conditions: