UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

Commission file number 000-30401

CYPRESS COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING CO., INC.

15 PIEDMONT CENTER, SUITE 100, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30305

(404) 869-2500

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b)
of the Act :

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g)
of the Act :

COMMON STOCK, $0.001 PAR VALUE

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s outstanding shares of common stock held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2004 was $2,131,595.59, computed by reference to the closing sale price of the common stock of $0.61 per share on such date. Aggregate market value has been estimated solely for the purposes of this report. For purposes of this calculation, all executive officers, directors and 10% stockholders are classified as affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 6,723,395 shares of common stock as of March 1, 2005.

CYPRESS COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING CO., INC.

FISCAL YEAR 2004 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

SPECIAL CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

(All dollar amounts are presented in thousands, except per share amounts)

     Certain statements contained in this report constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases, forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “estimate,” “intend,” “continue,” “believe,” “expect,” or “plan” or the negatives thereof, variations thereon or similar terminology. These forward-looking statements are found at various places throughout this report. These forward-looking statements generally relate to estimates, plans and objectives related to future operations as well as the markets for our services and products and are based upon management’s estimates of future results or trends. Although we believe that the plans and objectives reflected in or suggested by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, such plans or objectives may not be achieved. Actual results may differ from projected results due, but not limited, to assumptions which do not materialize, unforeseen developments, and/or matters beyond our control, including developments relating to the following:

     You should read this report completely and with the understanding that actual future results may be materially different from what we expect. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing

1

factors and the factors discussed in Item 1 and elsewhere in this report. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of the document in which they are made. We disclaim any obligation or undertaking to provide any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statement to reflect any change in our expectations or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which the forward-looking statement is based, in any future statement, report, press release or other communication.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

INTRODUCTION

     Cypress Communications Holding Co., Inc. (together with its subsidiaries, “Cypress Holding,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) (formerly U.S. RealTel, Inc.) operates in one business segment, namely, the provision of telecommunications services. Since Cypress Holding’s acquisition of Cypress Communications, Inc. (“Cypress Communications”) in February 2002, it has provided a full range of telecommunications services to small to medium sized businesses in commercial office buildings located in select major metropolitan markets in the United States. During 2001 and through the first quarter of 2002, Cypress Holding also operated in the telecommunications business rights segment, all of which operations were conducted in Latin America, namely in Argentina and Brazil. In March 2002, Cypress Holding liquidated its Latin American telecommunications rights operations. See “Description of Business — Discontinuance of Telecommunications Rights Business.”

TELECOMMUNICATIONS SERVICES

Overview

     Cypress Holding, through Cypress Communications, is an on-demand communication solution provider in 25 major metropolitan U.S. markets. Each day, Cypress connects more than 100,000 employees for over 8,000 small and medium-sized businesses in commercial office buildings. As the nation’s largest provider of in-building, managed communication solutions, Cypress supplies fully managed voice, data and Internet communications, including advanced digital and IP phones, unlimited local and long distance calling, business-class and dedicated Internet connectivity, firewalls, security and VPN solutions, audio/web conferencing, business television and IP communication solutions. We deliver these services over fiber optic, digital and broadband networks that we design, construct, own or lease and operate inside large and medium-sized office buildings.

     We target large and medium sized commercial office buildings in central business districts and suburban office markets within select major metropolitan markets in the United States where small and medium-sized businesses are typically located. We believe that our target businesses generally are under-served by incumbent telecommunication service providers. Properties that house many tenants with heavy demand for telecommunications services are the most desirable properties and offer us the opportunity to generate the highest revenue. Our current operations are in the following 25 markets: Atlanta, Birmingham, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Denver, Hartford, Houston, Indianapolis, Miami, Minneapolis, Nashville, New Orleans, New Jersey, New York, Orlando, Philadelphia, Phoenix, Pittsburgh, Portland, San Francisco, Seattle, Southern California (Los Angeles and Orange County), Tampa and Washington, DC.

     In all of our markets we bundle voice and internet data services to provide “one-stop shopping” communications solutions under the service brand “EZ Office Communications” to building tenants at competitive prices. In 68 buildings, we also provide business class cable television services as part of our comprehensive communications package. Because we currently own or lease and operate our in-building networks, we are typically able to deploy services to a new customer within a few days of receiving an order. In addition, we are often able to provide same day service for existing customers requesting new services or features, such as increased internet bandwidth or additional telephone lines.

     Our current telecommunications services include:

2

     Data Services. We utilize our in-building fiber optic networks to deliver high-speed Internet access directly to our customers in approximately 20 percent of our in-service buildings. The remaining buildings are served by leased facilities with the incumbent local exchange carriers and other competitive local exchange carriers (“CLEC”). We also utilize in-building CATV (Category 5 Cable) to deliver high-speed Internet access directly to our customers under the service name “SmartNet” in approximately another 20 percent of our in-service buildings. The buildings which utilize fiber optic networks and CATV deliver the high-speed Internet access using a Cisco Systems™ router and switch deployed in the building. The remaining buildings employ high speed Internet access delivered through a Digital Subscriber Line Access Multiplexer (“DSLAM”) deployed in the building over twisted pair copper infrastructure. Our Internet service provides full Internet protocol routing, symmetric upstream and downstream bandwidth, and plug-and-play installation. Our customers do not need to purchase or maintain any specialized hardware to use our Internet service. Moreover, because our service is capable of delivering up to 10/100 Mbps Ethernet connectivity, we are poised to meet our customer’s growing bandwidth needs. The key features of our Internet services are:

     In addition to our standard Internet access service, we offer other enhanced data services, including:

3

     Voice Services. Substantially all of our voice services customers rent their telephone devices from us. This ensures a compatible interface with our in-building communications equipment and provides customers with a number of key benefits, including access to an advanced, multi-function digital telephone system; significant reductions in up-front capital costs; and reduced risk of technological obsolescence. Our voice offerings include both traditional telephone services, such as local and long distance services, as well as value-added services, such as integrated voicemail, audio conferencing, webconferencing, calling cards and customizable toll-free number services. Additional enhanced features include call waiting, call forwarding, dial-back and caller identification.

     Bundled Voice and Data Services. Our customers tell us that assessing needs and selecting and managing vendors for voice, data and video communications services is becoming increasingly complex. The historical approach to selling communications services has been “a la carte” packaging from numerous vendors. In the fall of 2003, we introduced our EZ Office Communications suite which provides complete solutions for a simplified seat price. This bundling approach has been popular with both new and existing customers and has the potential to substantially optimize the customer buying process. We have also seen a significant trend toward flat rate or unlimited long distance packaging. We began packaging EZ Office Flat Rate solutions in the fall of 2003 and expect a majority of future customers to purchase these types of solutions.

     Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Services. In late 2003, we began offering our bundled VoIP service offering both inside and outside our 1,300 on-net office buildings. EZ Office IP Communications is a fully managed voice, data and Internet solution that combines the durability of traditional telecom with the advanced functionality of a Web-enabled user interface and innovative user features, such as:

     We launched the EZ Office IP Communications service offerings in mid-2004 to all of our 25 markets, which enables our VoIP solutions over our high speed Internet service. The specific application for delivering voice communications features to end-users is known as IP Centrex. IP Centrex can enable significant new functionality for our customers and is expected to be the next wave of communications solutions for business customers. IP Centrex can also be provided over “managed local loops” which

4

allows us to provide services to customers in off-net buildings. The benefits of IP Centrex for us include opportunities to:

     Our VoIP solution consists of our EZ Office Web Dashboard, unlimited local calling, bundled minutes or unlimited long distance, high speed Internet and Cisco IP telephones. Functionality includes:

     Video and Other Services. In 68 buildings, we offer our customers a comprehensive package of business class television services consisting of news, business, sports and network programming. We deliver these services directly to our customers over our in-building networks using a combination of direct broadcast satellite programming and off-air local channels. Our customers can elect to receive more or less programming depending on their needs.

     We continue to investigate, test and add, where appropriate, complementary communications products and services to enhance our “one-stop shopping” strategy.

5

Employees

     As of March 1, 2005 we employed 331 active, full-time employees, all in the United States. All of these employees are employed by Cypress Holding’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Cypress Communications. We believe our employee relationships are good.

Competition

     We face significant competition. Both existing competitors and numerous other companies that may seek to enter one or more aspects of our businesses may expose us to severe price competition for our services and for building access rights. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial resources and may also be able to respond more quickly to technological developments and changes in customers’ needs.

     We face competition in providing telecommunications services from:

6

Sales and Marketing

     We market our on-net telecommunications services directly to the tenants in our licensed buildings. Our typical license agreement enables us to display and disseminate our marketing materials in the leasing office and other locations within a building. Many of our license agreements also require building owners, along with management and leasing representatives to advise tenants of the availability of our services and notify us as new tenants enter the building. In addition to these rights, we use landlord, property manager and tenant testimonials and references as marketing tools. We currently provide data and/or voice communications services to many of the landlords and property managers within our licensed buildings, due in part to the requirement under some of our license agreements that we provide free basic Internet access to such parties.

     Our VoIP based EZ Office Communications Suite allows us to utilize leased, high speed data facilities to connect to any commercial customers’ premises in our 25 major metropolitan markets. This bundled EZ Office IP Communications offering effectively expands our addressable market for deploying bundles services outside of our traditional 1,000 on-net buildings.

     Our sales approach is highly consultative. In our initial sales meetings, we work closely with prospective customers to assess their particular communications needs. We then present potential customers with customized proposals which we believe are often less expensive, more comprehensive and easier to administer than their current communications solutions.

Real Estate Selection and Marketing

     Overall, as of December 31, 2004, we had license agreements giving us the right to operate our networks in more than 1,500 buildings, representing more than 500 million rentable square feet of office space in the United States and we were actually operating in approximately 1,000 of those buildings, representing more than 300 million rentable square feet of office space. Under the terms of our license agreements, we pay property owners a fixed rental fee and/or a percentage of the revenue we receive from providing communications services to the tenants in a building.

7

Suppliers

     We connect our in-building networks to local, long distance and Internet service providers in order to serve our customers. In most of our markets, we connect our networks to, and lease facilities from, CLECs, collocation service providers and local telephone companies.

     We purchase long-distance transmission capacity from several long-distance carriers, such as MCI, XO Communications and AT&T. Under some of these agreements, we are required to undertake material minimum revenue and/or volume commitments. For a description of our aggregate commitments see Note 9(c) to the Notes to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

     To provide Internet services to our customers, we purchase intraLATA data transmission connectivity between our licensed buildings and local points of presence from CLECs, including MCI, XO Communications, Time Warner Telecom and local exchange carriers. We obtain our local points of presence from collocation service providers, such as C3 Communications, IX2, Semaphore and Switch & Data. We use broadband service providers, such as MCI, XO Communications, Level 3 and Sprint, to procure connectivity between our collocation facilities and the Internet backbone.

     Our in-building networks contain equipment such as data switches and routers, voice switches and other communications and video equipment that we purchase from Nortel Networks, Cisco Systems, Viadux and other manufacturers. As of March 1, 2005, we do not have minimum purchase commitments with any of our equipment manufacturers. There are alternative vendors available to us for all the types of equipment that we purchase.

Regulation

     Overview. Our telecommunications services are subject to regulation at the federal, state and local levels. The regulations that apply to our operations are susceptible to change as a result of ongoing administrative proceedings, litigation and new legislation. For example, the FCC has had a pending proceeding for several years that could result in new rules affecting our competitive position in multiple tenant environments (“MTEs”), such as limiting the preferences that landlords may allow to an in-building provider. In addition, our costs are affected by regulations governing the dominant local telephone companies, on which we rely for transmission facilities and network access in many cases. The outcome of these various proceedings, as well as any other regulatory initiatives, cannot be predicted. Future regulatory changes may have a material adverse affect on our business and operations.

     Local Voice Telephone Service. Cypress Communications Operating Company, LLC (formerly Cypress Communications Operating Company, Inc., “Cypress Operating Company”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Cypress Communications, is authorized to provide local exchange service as a CLEC in Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington and Washington, D.C. Another subsidiary of Cypress Communications, Cypress Communications Holding Company of Virginia, LLC (formerly Cypress Communications Holding Company of Virginia, Inc., “Cypress Virginia”), is authorized to provide local exchange service in Virginia. As a CLEC, Cypress (including both Cypress Operating Company and Cypress Virginia) is authorized to resell other carriers’ local voice services. If Cypress obtains such services from ILECs, the tariff rates under which it obtains services may be subject to change as the result of regulatory proceedings over which Cypress does not have control. Depending on state regulations, Cypress may also construct its own facilities or purchase network elements from ILECs in order to provide telecommunications services. To provide local voice services as a CLEC, Cypress obtains interconnection services from an ILEC under the ILEC’s existing tariff or by separate interconnection agreement. Cypress has entered into interconnection agreements with the dominant ILECs in each of the markets in which it operates.

     Regulations promulgated by the FCC under the Telecommunications Act of 1996 Act (the “1996 Act”) require ILECs to provide interconnection, including access to unbundled network elements and retail

8

services, at wholesale rates to CLEC competitors. Cypress has exercised its rights under the 1996 Act to obtain access to unbundled elements of the ILECs’ networks in several of its markets. By doing this, as well as by migrating circuits to other CLECs, we have been able to reduce our network operating costs. These cost savings, however, depend on the regulatory duties of ILECs to provide us with unbundled elements at regulated rates. Because the regulatory duties of ILECs are subject to change, we cannot assure you that we can continue to benefit from cost savings in the future.

     The FCC has revised its interconnection regulations several times since 1996 and many of the FCC’s decisions have been subject to court appeals. During 2004 and early 2005, the FCC released significant changes to its rules governing access to unbundled network elements, and proposed additional changes (which have not yet been adopted) to its rules governing the prices for these elements. The FCC rules are currently the subject of appeals before the U.S. Court of Appeals in several circuits. The uncertainty from this and other pending judicial and regulatory proceedings makes it difficult to predict whether we will be able to rely on existing interconnection rights and obligations or have the ability to negotiate acceptable interconnection agreements in the future.

     CLECs’ local and in-state telecommunications services are typically subject to some degree of state regulation. Most states require that CLECs receive approval to operate from the state’s public service commission. CLECs are generally required to file tariffs setting forth the terms, conditions and prices for voice services. In addition, under federal law, including the 1996 Act, CLECs are subject to additional obligations, including requirements to interconnect with other carriers, to provide other carriers access to their networks, to comply with number portability and dialing parity obligations, and to make the terms of their agreements available to other carriers on a non-discriminatory basis. On the other hand, CLECs have the right, among other things, to obtain interconnection with ILECs, to receive reciprocal compensation for terminating the calls of other local carriers and access charges for originating and terminating long distance calls for other long distance providers, and to purchase unbundled network elements and wholesale services of the ILEC’s network at prices not available to other ILEC customers.

     As a CLEC, we are required to comply with a variety of state laws and regulations concerning billing format, notices to customers, restrictions on disconnection for non-payment and other causes, filing of tariffs and reports, and payment of taxes, fees, and surcharges, including the federally-mandated universal service fund contribution. Compliance with these legal requirements increases the cost of our operations. In addition, complaints by customers or by state regulatory agencies alleging violations of any of these requirements could cause us to incur substantial legal and administrative expenses and adversely affect our business, even if the allegations are not ultimately proven.

     If we construct facilities that cross public rights-of-way, for example to connect customers in two or more buildings, or to connect to the facilities of an ILEC, we may also be subject to local government land use and franchise regulations. If local governments impose conditions on granting permits or other authorizations or if they fail to grant such permits or other authorizations in a timely manner, it may negatively impact our ability to expand our network on a timely basis and adversely affect our business.

     Long Distance Voice Services. Under current regulations, we are not required to file tariffs with the FCC in order to provide domestic interstate and international long distance services; but we are required to adhere to certain basic rules and regulations regarding such services that are promulgated by the FCC, including the payment of certain regulatory fees. Cypress Operating Company is authorized by the FCC to provide international switched resale services. In some states, we must obtain authorization to provide intrastate long distance voice services. Cypress Operating Company is currently authorized to provide intrastate long distance services in Alabama, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington, Washington, D.C. and Wisconsin. Cypress Virginia is authorized to provide intrastate long distance services in Virginia.

     Data Services. Our Internet and data services generally are not subject to federal, state or local regulation. Congress and some state legislatures have considered imposing taxes and other burdens on

9

Internet service providers and regulating content provided over the Internet. In addition, we may be affected by certain statutes, regulations and court cases that assess liability against Internet service providers and other on-line service providers for providing information or content across their services or equipment that violates copyright, indecency, obscenity and other laws, or is defamatory, fraudulent or tortious in nature. The FCC is now considering a variety of proposals that could impose additional burdens on some services offered over the Internet, including obligations on some or all providers of Internet access services to contribute to the cost of federal universal service programs, and additional regulation of services that transmit voice communications over the Internet. Future regulation may have a negative impact on our ability to offer Internet services at competitive and profitable rates.

     Video and Other Services. Our video services are regulated to a far lesser extent than the video services of traditional cable operators, which receive franchises from the municipalities they serve and typically construct facilities across public rights of way. For example, our video programming rates are not regulated and we are not subject to “must carry” obligations, which require cable license franchisees to provide certain programming to customers. We are subject to some technical requirements with regard to our provision of video services, such as requirements that our facilities not cause harmful interference with certain other communications systems.

     We do not own or operate any direct broadcast satellites (“DBS”) or hold any similar types of licenses. Rather, we resell the programming services of DBS providers, such as DirecTV, Inc. Thus, our video services are regulated to a far lesser extent than the video services of traditional DBS operators.

     Recent rulings of the FCC may help facilitate the provision of our video services. For example, the FCC has ruled that under certain circumstances, a roof may be considered an area controlled by a tenant upon which the owners of multiple unit premises cannot forbid the installation of some communication devices, such as satellite dishes.

     We do not hold any cellular or similar types of radio licenses. To the extent that we provide cellular or paging services, we rent or sell pagers and wireless phones and resell the services of third party wireless providers. Consequently, while we do pay some regulatory fees, we generally are not subject to federal regulation with respect to these services.

     911 and Enhanced 911. The FCC requires telecommunications carriers to establish 911 service, i.e., three digit dialing access to public safety call centers for emergency services. Enhanced 911, or E911, service permits the public safety call center to identify a caller’s telephone number and calling location for the dispatch of emergency personnel. 911 and E911 services are regulated at the federal, state and local level. Some states have enacted, or are likely to enact, legislation that will impose a penalty or surcharge on service providers whose telecommunications equipment does not meet or exceed the E911 requirements for the applicable jurisdiction. We currently offer, or are preparing to offer, 911 or E911 services in locations where the service is technically feasible; however, our ability to provide emergency service may be impeded by failed systems, systems that were not properly configured, systems that were not updated to reflect changes in technology or public networks, and certain other technical problems. We may incur penalties, surcharges, damages or other liabilities where, and to the extent that, we cannot provide 911 or E911 service.

Intellectual Property

     We regard certain aspects of our products, services and technology as proprietary; however, because we are not currently prosecuting any patent, trademark or copyright applications before the United States Patent and Trademark or Copyright Office, it may be possible for third parties to copy or use some of our intellectual property without authorization. Notwithstanding the foregoing, we regularly execute confidentiality, non-disclosure and non-competition agreements with our carriers, vendors, employees and representatives, in addition to other precautions, to protect our intellectual property.

10

DISCONTINUANCE OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS RIGHTS BUSINESS

Overview

     In our former telecommunications rights operations, we provided site access and usage rights, which we call “telecommunications rights,” to telecommunications companies in Latin America. We obtained telecommunications rights from property owners under long-term, “master lease” agreements. Under the master leases, we received the rights to install communications infrastructure in a property and/or to provide communications services to the property’s tenants. In exchange, we paid the property owner a percentage of the revenues that we received from subleasing the telecommunications rights to telecommunications companies. We conducted these operations only in Argentina and Brazil. In March 2002, we liquidated our Latin American operations.

HISTORY

     Cypress Holding was organized in January 1997 under the name “AGILE, LLC.” Cypress Holding was incorporated in the State of Illinois under the name “U.S. RealTel, Inc.” in August 1997. In November 1997, U.S. RealTel merged with and into Admiral Two Capital Corporation and the surviving company’s name was changed to “U.S. RealTel, Inc.” On May 8, 2000, U.S. RealTel reincorporated in the State of Delaware. U.S. RealTel, Inc. established operations in Buenos Aires, Argentina in December 1998 and in Sao Paolo, Brazil in February 2000. U.S. RealTel, Inc. conducted its Latin American operations in Argentina through RealTel de Argentina, S.A., a majority owned Argentine corporation, and in Brazil through RealTel do Brasil, S.A., a majority owned Brazilian corporation. Both Latin American operations have been liquidated. On June 16, 2004, U.S. RealTel, Inc. amended its certificate of incorporation to change its name to Cypress Communications Holding Co., Inc.

     In March 2002, Cypress Holding acquired Cypress Communications, a U.S. based operation that provides a full range of telecommunications services to businesses in commercial office buildings located in select major metropolitan markets within the United States. The acquisition of Cypress Communications allowed Cypress Holding to concentrate its resources and expertise on providing premium communications services to over 2,500 small and medium sized business customers in seven major metropolitan U.S. markets: Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Dallas, Houston, Los Angeles and Seattle.

     In July 2002, through Cypress Communications, Cypress Holding completed the purchase of certain assets of Intermedia Advanced Building Networks, the shared tenant telecommunications services business of WorldCom, Inc. (“ABN/STS”). The acquired assets included all customer contracts, in-building networks and the associated building access rights, as well as the necessary employees to support such assets. The acquisition of ABN/STS allowed Cypress Communications to extend its telecommunications services operations to over 5,700 small and medium sized business customers in 25 major metropolitan U.S. markets.

     In March 2003, Cypress Holding, through Cypress Communications, acquired the Southern California building-centric voice and data services business of Eureka Broadband Corporation (“Eureka”). These assets included customer contracts, as well as Eureka’s in-building networks and associated building access rights. The acquisition of the Eureka assets has allowed Cypress Holding to expand its telecommunications services operations to include over 750 small and medium sized business customers in the California market.

     In July 2003, Cypress Holding, through Cypress Communications, negotiated the surrender of certain assets from E-Building Solutions, Inc. (“E-Building”) in California, a building-centric data services business, to mitigate the loss resulting from E-Building’s default on a $450 note receivable due to Cypress Communications. These assets included customer contracts, as well as E-Building’s in-building networks and associated building access rights.

11

Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results

     An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the factors described below, in addition to those discussed elsewhere in this report, in analyzing an investment in our common stock. If any of the events described below occurs, or if any risk not identified below negatively impacts us, our business, financial condition and results of operations would likely suffer, the trading price of our common stock could fall and you could lose all or part of the money you paid for our common stock.

     In addition, the following factors could cause our actual results to differ materially from those projected in our forward-looking statements, whether made in this Form 10-K, our annual or quarterly reports to shareholders, future press releases, SEC filings or orally, whether in presentations, responses to questions or otherwise. See “Special Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

The pending acquisition of the Company might not be consummated.

     As mentioned elsewhere in this report, the Company has entered into, and the stockholders have approved, an Agreement and Plan of Merger pursuant to which the Company will merge with and into a wholly-owned subsidiary of TechInvest Holding Company, Inc., an affiliate of Arcapita, Inc., and become a wholly-owned subsidiary of TechInvest Holding Company, Inc. The consummation of the merger is subject to customary closing conditions and certain regulatory approvals, all of which have not yet been completed. The failure to consummate the merger could have a material adverse impact on our business.

We may not be able to recover any of the telecommunications taxes and surcharges that were overpaid.

     In September 2004, management determined that the Company made payments to telecommunications service providers for federal, state and local taxes and surcharges on telecommunications services for which it might be exempt. The Company is attempting to recover these taxes and surcharges directly from the telecommunications service providers involved. Although management believes that the amount of taxes and surcharges which the Company is entitled to recover is in the range of $1,000 to $2,500, there is no assurance that any of the amounts will be recovered or when the amounts will be recovered, if ever.

Our short operating history makes it difficult to predict future operating results.

     Our business was founded in January 1997. We have only operated in the telecommunications services business since February 2002. As such, we have a short operating history and limited historical financial and operating data with respect to our business. We have incurred significant cumulative operating losses and negative cash flows from operations since inception.

We may incur operating losses in the foreseeable future.

     Although we have recently achieved profitability in our operations, there is no guarantee that we can sustain this level of profitability. Since we entered into the telecommunications services business, we have only recently reported our first operating profits from continuing operations. As a result, we will need to continue to generate significant revenue to maintain profitability, which may not occur.

Our business model may not succeed.

     We are attempting to implement our business model in a highly competitive and fast-changing telecommunications market which makes it impossible to predict the extent to which our business model will succeed. We may continue to make substantial capital expenditures in deploying our networks without knowing whether our business plan can be successfully executed. As a result, there is a risk that our business will fail. Additionally, our limited operating history makes it difficult to evaluate the execution of our business model thus far.

12

     To be successful, we must develope, market and implement the various components of our business strategy at widely accepted prices that exceed our operating expenses. Even if we execute our business model as we plan, we cannot be certain that we will ever achieve favorable operating results, profitability or generate revenues sufficient to cover our capital and operating costs.

We have substantial debt.

     We have incurred substantial debt to date for purposes of funding our acquisitions and operations. We may use a substantial portion of our cash flow to pay principal and interest on our debt, thereby reducing the funds available for working capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes, including executing our business strategy. In addition, a substantial portion of this debt will become due in the next 12 months. We may not be able to generate adequate cash flows from operations to repay this debt, or we may not be able to refinance this debt with a long term debt facility. Our inability to repay or refinance this debt could have a material negative impact on our operations.

We must attract and retain key personnel in order to implement our business plan.

     The loss of the services of key personnel or the failure to attract additional qualified personnel as required could have a material adverse effect on our ability to sustain our business or grow. We believe that our future success will depend in large part on our ability to attract and retain qualified managerial, technical and sales personnel.

We may not be able to grow sufficiently and manage that growth in order to be successful.

     If we are successful in implementing our business plan, our operations may expand rapidly. We believe we must grow our business in order to achieve sufficient economies of scale to operate profitably. Because the communications industry is capital intensive, rapidly evolving and subject to significant economies of scale, as a relatively small organization we are at a competitive disadvantage. The growth we must achieve to reduce that disadvantage will put a significant strain on all of our resources. We will require substantial additional capital beyond that which is currently available to us in order to finance our growth according to our current business plan. If we fail to grow rapidly or obtain additional capital, we may not be able to compete with larger, more established companies

     Furthermore, rapid expansion could place a significant strain on our management, financial and other resources. Our ability to manage future growth, if it occurs, will depend on, among other things, our ability to: (1) control expenses related to our business plan; (2) maintain responsive customer service; (3) improve existing, and implement new, billing and collections, operational support and administrative systems; and (4) expand, train and manage our employee base, in particular qualified sales, technical and managerial personnel. The failure to manage our growth effectively would impair our business and operational performance. We may not be able to maintain the quality of our operations, to control our costs, and to expand our internal management, technical, information and accounting systems in order to support our desired growth.

We rely upon information processing systems provided by others.

     Sophisticated information processing systems are vital to our growth and our ability to achieve operating efficiencies. A failure of any of these systems would have a material adverse effect on our operations and business. In addition, there may be other systems we have not identified that are required or in need of improvement. We may also be unable to maintain and upgrade these systems as necessary.

We must purchase voice and data transmission capacity from third parties who may be unable or unwilling to meet our requirements.

     We rely upon other communications carriers, such as local telephone companies, long distance companies and Internet service providers, to provide transmission capacity from the buildings we serve.

13

Our failure to obtain adequate connections from other carriers on a timely and efficient basis could delay or impede our ability to provide services and generate revenue. Sufficient capacity or redundant capacity may not be readily available from third parties at commercially reasonable rates, if at all. Our failure to obtain sufficient redundant connectivity could result in an inability to provide service in certain buildings and service interruptions, which could in time lead to loss of customers and damage to our reputation. Additionally, many of the communications carriers we rely on for transmission capacity are also our direct competitors.

The sector in which we operate is highly competitive, and we may not be able to compete effectively.

     The numerous companies that may seek to enter our niche may expose us to greater price competition for our services. Competition could also result in a diminution of our net revenue margins. We face competition from many communications providers with significantly greater financial resources, well-established brand names, larger customer bases and diverse strategic plans and technologies. For example, we face competition from traditional and new communications companies, including local, long distance, cable modem, Internet, digital subscriber line, fixed and mobile wireless and satellite data service providers. Intense competition has led to declining prices and margins for many communications services. We expect this trend to continue as competition intensifies in the future.

     If our competitors successfully focus on our market, the intense competition could materially harm our business. To the extent these competitors are successful, we may face difficulties in building our networks and marketing our services within some of our target buildings. Because our agreements to use utility shaft space within buildings are generally not exclusive, owners of such buildings may give similar rights to our competitors. If a competitor installs a network in a building in which we operate, there will likely be substantial price competition preventing us from operating in that building profitably. In addition, we may also face severe price competition for building access rights, which could result in higher sales and marketing expenses and lower profit margins.

We must continue to obtain license agreements with building owners and managers in order to be successful.

     Our business depends upon our ability to continue to operate our in-building networks. The failure of building owners or managers to grant or renew access rights on acceptable terms, or any deterioration in our existing relationships with building owners or managers, could harm our marketing efforts and could substantially reduce our potential customer base. Current federal and state regulations do not require building owners to make space available to us, or to do so on terms that are reasonable or nondiscriminatory. Building owners or managers may decide not to permit us to install our networks in their buildings or may elect not to renew our license agreements. Non-renewal of these agreements would reduce our revenues and we might not recover our infrastructure costs.

Alternative technologies pose competitive threats.

     The communications industry is subject to rapid and significant technological change, such as continuing developments in digital subscriber line technology and alternative technologies for providing high-speed data communications. In addition to fiber-optic technology, there are other technologies, such as VoIP, DSL and wireless technology that provide more capacity and speed than traditional copper wire transmission technology. Our success in improving and expanding our operations and services will depend on our ability to anticipate or adapt to new technology on a timely basis. The development of new technologies or the significant penetration of alternative technologies into our target market may either reduce the demand for our services, require us to devote important capital, and human and technical resources to upgrade, reconfigure or replace our current or future technology or some combination of each of these, and consequently could have a material adverse effect on our business.

14

Retained control by our principal stockholders may create conflicts of interest.

     The concentration of ownership of our stock may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control, merger, consolidation, or a tender offer which could involve a premium over the price of our common stock. Currently, our executive officers, directors and greater-than-five-percent stockholders and their affiliates, in the aggregate, beneficially own a substantial percentage of the outstanding common stock (not including shares issuable upon the conversion or exercise of warrants or options). If all of these stockholders were to vote together as a group, they would have the ability to exert significant influence over our board of directors and its policies as well as other significant corporate matters such as charter and bylaw amendments and possible mergers or corporate control contests.

Legislation and government regulation could adversely affect us.

     Many of our services are subject to federal, state and/or local regulation. If we fail to comply with all applicable regulations or experience delays in obtaining required approvals, our business could be harmed. For example, we must make regular filings in some of the states in which we operate and could be fined if we do not timely make these filings. Additionally, compliance with these regulatory requirements may be costly. We may experience delays in closing future corporate transactions, including debt and equity financings and sales of any portion of our regulated business, due to requirements to obtain regulatory approval of these transactions. Regulations governing communications services also change from time to time in ways that are difficult to predict. Such changes may harm our business by increasing competition, decreasing revenue, increasing costs, impairing our ability to offer services or otherwise. For example, the FCC could mandate that building owners give access to competitive providers of communications services.

     If our interpretation of regulations applicable to our operations is incorrect, we may incur additional expenses or become subject to more stringent regulation. If our interpretations of these regulations and guidelines are incorrect, we may incur additional expenses to comply with additional regulations applicable to our operations. We also may incur significant expenses to defend ourselves against complaints by customers or other persons who claim we have violated applicable regulations, even if our interpretation of the rules is ultimately upheld by the regulatory agency.

We have significant fixed costs.

     As of December 31, 2004, we have committed to pay approximately $10,449 for services from other communications carriers through 2007. We will have to pay those carriers even if we do not use their services. We operate in a market that requires high fixed costs to build out our in-building networks and we therefore must have high utilization of our products and services with each building in which we operate in order to be successful. We expect that the communications needs will be in excess of the purchase requirements for the years ending December 31, 2005, 2006 and 2007.

Our business could suffer from a reduction or interruption from our equipment suppliers.

     We purchase our equipment from various vendors. Any reduction in or interruption of deliveries from our major equipment suppliers, such as Cisco Systems and Nortel Networks, could delay our plans to install in-building networks, impair our ability to acquire or retain customers and harm our business generally. In addition, the price of the equipment we purchase may substantially increase over time, increasing the costs we pay in the future. It could take a significant period of time to establish relationships with alternative suppliers for each of our technologies and substitute their technologies into our networks.

We must make capital expenditures before generating revenues, which may prove insufficient to justify those expenditures.

     We typically install an in-building network before we have any customers in that building. Since we generally do not solicit customers within a building until our network is in place we may not be able to

15

recoup all of our expenditures within any building. Prior to generating revenues in a building, we must incur initial capital expenditures. Our expenditures will vary depending on the size of the building and whether we encounter any construction-related difficulties. After initial installation of our network, our capital expenditures continue to grow based on the extent to which we add customers within a building.

Any acquisitions or investments we make could disrupt our business and be dilutive to our existing stockholders.

     We may consider acquisitions of, or investments in, complementary businesses, technologies, services or products from time to time. Acquisitions and investments involve numerous risks, including:

In addition, these acquisitions or investments may result in:

Any of these factors could materially harm our business or our operating results.

Our networks may be vulnerable to unauthorized access which could interfere with the provision of our services.

     Our networks may be vulnerable to unauthorized access, computer viruses and other disruptive problems. Remediating the effects of computer viruses and alleviating other security problems may require interruptions, incurrence of costs and delays or cessation of service to our customers. Unauthorized access could jeopardize the security of confidential information stored in our computer systems or those of our customers, for which we could possibly be held liable. Any unauthorized access could further damage our reputation and ultimately our ability to successfully compete in our market.

Impairment of our intellectual property rights could harm our business.

     We regard certain aspects of our products, services and technology as proprietary and attempt to protect them with legal rights, contractual rights and other methods. Despite these precautions, it may be possible for a third party to copy or otherwise obtain and use our proprietary products, services or technology without authorization, or to develop similar proprietary matter independently. If a third party were to obtain our proprietary information and we were unable to prevent them from disseminating that information or using it to our disadvantage, our business could be harmed.

The exercise of outstanding securities my have a dilutive effect.

     We have outstanding warrants and options with exercise prices ranging from $0.01 per share to $10.00 per share. The exercise of these securities could have a dilutive effect with respect to holders of our

16

common stock. As of March 1, 2005, the total number of shares issuable by us under outstanding warrants and options was approximately 15,103.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

     Cypress Holding has subleased all or part of the above offices with the exception of: 160 Federal Street, 1555 Oakbrook, 1650 Market Street, 222 W. Los Colinas and One Riverway, which Cypress Holding leases directly from the landlord.

     We lease space in 30 additional commercial properties in the United States for general office purposes, network facilities, storage and warehouses, in each instance under leases that do not contain material financial obligations.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

     We are a party to various legal proceedings that are ordinary and incidental to our business. Except as set forth below, management does not expect that any currently pending legal proceedings will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations or financial position.

     With respect to our ABN/STS acquisition, on or about January 23, 2003, we filed proofs of claim in the bankruptcy cases of WorldCom, Inc. and certain of its debtor affiliates as a result of such parties’ defaults under that certain Asset Purchase Agreement dated May 31, 2002 by and among Intermedia Communications, Inc., Shared Technologies Fairchild, Inc., Shared Technologies Fairfield Telecom, Inc., MCI Worldcom Communications, Inc., Worldcom, Inc., MCI-WORLDCOM Network Services, Inc. and Cypress Communications, that certain Omnibus Post-Closing Agreement dated July 16, 2002, by and among Intermedia Communications, Shared Technologies Fairchild, Shared Technologies Fairfield Telecom, MCI Worldcom Communications, Worldcom, Inc., MCI-WORLDCOM Network Services and

17

Cypress Communications and certain other related ancillary documents. We filed amendments to these proofs of claim on January 29, 2004 to increase our claim to approximately $13,900 , which amended proofs of claim to include damages caused to us as a result of certain fraudulent accounting practices of the debtors (not, so far as we are aware, specific to Cypress Communications) and failure to perform required actions and other breaches of the Transaction Documents by the Debtors.

     On or about October 18, 2004, the Debtors objected to the Company’s proofs of claim and a hearing has been set for April 22, 2005. The Company expects that WorldCom will bring counterclaims alleging breaches by Cypress of the agreements and related ancillary documents. The Company expects such counterclaims may seek damages of approximately $2,300, of which the Company has approximately $1,500 currently recorded in accrued expenses. The Company cannot express an opinion as to whether a favorable or unfavorable outcome is either probable or remote or to estimate the range of any possible loss or gain that may result from the settlement of these claims. An unfavorable outcome could, under certain circumstances, result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

     No matters were submitted during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2004 to a vote of the security holders.

PART II

(All dollar and share amounts are presented in thousands, except per share amounts)

     Our common stock is quoted on the Nasdaq OTC Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”) under the symbol “CYHI.” The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low bid quotations for the common stock, as reflected on the OTCBB. The following quotations represent inter-dealer prices without adjustment for retail markups, markdowns or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

     As of March 1, 2005, there were 109 holders of record of our common stock. We believe that there are in excess of 300 beneficial owners of our common stock.

     To date, we have not declared or paid any dividends on our common stock. The payment of dividends, if any, is within the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon our earnings,

18

capital requirements and financial condition and other relevant factors. We do not intend to declare any dividends in the foreseeable future, but instead intend to retain future earnings, if any, for use in our business operations.

     The following table describes the equity securities issuable as of December 31, 2004 pursuant to our equity compensation plans. For a description of our equity compensation plans see Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

     The selected consolidated financial data presented below as of and for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000 is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. In late 2001, we discontinued the business of our predecessor company, U.S. RealTel, Inc. In March 2002, we liquidated the Latin America operations of U.S. RealTel, Inc. In February 2002, we completed the acquisition of Cypress Communications, and the results of our operations from that time are reflective of that business that was acquired, along with subsequent acquisitions in the same line of business. Certain expense items presented for 2000 and 2001 have been reclassified to comply with the current presentation format.

19

(All dollar amounts are presented in thousands, except per share amounts)

20

December 31,
(In thousands)

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

(All dollar and share amounts are presented in thousands, except per share amounts)

     The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain risk factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors That May Affect Future Results” below and elsewhere in this report. The following discussion also should be read in conjunction with the information set forth in our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in “Item 8. Financial Statements” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

     Beginning in February 2002 with Cypress Holding’s acquisition of Cypress Communications, we have provided a full range of reliable, feature rich, integrated telecommunications services to businesses located in select major metropolitan markets within the United States. We are the preferred communications provider in over 1,000 Class A commercial office buildings in such select markets. Our telecommunications services include high speed Internet access and data services, local and long-distance voice services, digital telephone systems, digital satellite business television, voicemail, e-mail, web site hosting, security/monitoring services, and other advanced communications services. We deliver these services over fiber optic, digital and broadband networks that we design, construct, own or lease and operate inside large and medium-sized office buildings. Additionally, during the three month period ended March 31, 2002, we provided, or sought to provide, site access and usage rights to telecommunications companies in Latin America through our 71%-owned Argentinean subsidiary and our 89%-owned Brazilian subsidiary. In March 2002, we liquidated our Latin American telecommunications rights operations.

     The year ended December 31, 2004 was the first year in which we reported net income from continuing operations exclusive of one time gains. Otherwise, except for a net gain of approximately $15,500 on the sale of our old North American telecommunications rights operations in December 2000 and an extraordinary gain of approximately $7,900 on the acquisition of Cypress Communications, under purchase accounting, we have incurred significant operating losses and experienced negative cash flows from operations since inception. Net income for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004 was $423, compared with a net loss for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2003 of $4,163 and a net loss of $1,729 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002. As of December 31, 2004, we had cash and cash equivalents of $215.

21

     The Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 include operations of Cypress Communications from February 1, 2002, the date of its acquisition for accounting purposes.

Executive Summary

     In evaluating our financial condition, management focuses on several key themes and indicators of both revenues and expense as described below:

     Revenue

     The key areas of management focus relative to our revenues revolve around the status of our customer base. We provide our services generally to tenants resident within the approximately 1,300 office buildings in which we maintain access agreements. These tenants are generally operating under the terms of multi-year lease agreements with the building landlord. To the extent tenants who are our customers leave these buildings either during the term of or at the termination of their lease agreements, they may cease to be our customer. We endeavor to replace these lost customers with new tenants entering the buildings. We expend significant effort in determining the status and intentions of our existing customers relative to their current lease agreements within buildings we serve, as well as the status of prospective tenants who may be moving into these buildings.

     In addition to “move in – move out” activity, the other key revenue focus area within our customer base is the average number of users per customer. This factor is significant in determining and forecasting the average revenue per customer, and is directly tied to overall employment factors within the general economy. To the extent an existing customer hires additional employees, our revenue from that customer should generally increase. Conversely, reductions in employment totals of a customer would result in a reduction in revenue from the customer.

     During 2002, 2003 and 2004, we determined that, within our retained customer base, there was an overall reduction in the number of contracted users of our services in excess of new customers added, resulting in a reduction in the average revenue per customer for our services. The rate of decline within the customer base appears to have decreased starting in the second half of 2004 with the overall improvements in the general economy.

     Based on discussions with building owners in the markets we service and overall industry reports, we expect an improvement in the occupancy rates for the types of buildings that we serve in 2005. Improvement in occupancy rates in these buildings increases the number of potential sales opportunities for our services. Management believes that recent stabilization in the general employment picture in the United States will result in a stabilization or improvement in the average revenue per customer over what we are now experiencing. Additionally, the addition during 2004 of our EZ Office IP Communications service offering allows us to expand our reach to customers outside of our serviced buildings. We expect that offering to begin generating significant new customer activity starting in 2005.

     Costs

     One of the most significant cost elements for us is the amounts paid to telecommunications carriers for the provision of our voice and data network elements. These costs have both fixed and variable components. A key focus of management’s attention is the proper management of these cost elements.

     Management’s objectives in managing the voice and data network elements is to provide a cost effective and highly reliable solution for our business. Achieving this objective involves determining both the correct number of circuit elements necessary to provide an appropriate level of customer service, along with determining the best cost provider for those circuit elements.

22

     Starting in late 2002 and throughout 2003 and 2004, management expended considerable effort in analyzing our network on a building by building basis to optimize the combination of service and cost. We were successful in reducing our overall network costs as a percentage of revenues from year to year, while continuing to provide an appropriate level of service to our customers.

     During 2003, we substantially completed a process of obtaining certification to be a CLEC in most of the markets where we operate. CLEC certification allows us to enter into agreements with the incumbent local exchange carriers (“ILECs”) to obtain network services at rates generally lower than those we previously paid. Starting in late 2003, we began the process of converting our network to the lower rate platforms with the various ILEC providers. This process was completed in early 2004 and was a significant contributor to the overall reduction in the cost of network elements during the year.

     The process of network analysis and re-grooming is ongoing. Management believes that there are additional opportunities for reduction in network costs through either reduction in network elements or transfer of elements to lower cost providers.

     Liquidity and Capital Resources

     Our primary sources of liquidity have been proceeds from the issuance of our common stock, convertible debentures, lines of credit and bridge loans, as well as proceeds from the sale of our former North American telecommunications rights operations in December 2000 and cash acquired through our acquisition of Cypress Communications. The terms of certain of our indebtedness limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends or undertake certain other transactions. We have also pledged certain assets as security under our senior credit facility. We must devote a substantial portion of our cash flow to service our indebtedness and cannot utilize that cash flow for operations.

     Beginning in the first quarter of 2002 and continuing throughout 2003 and 2004, we initiated certain actions intended to improve liquidity and operating results. As a result, we began to realize improvement to our overall liquidity. As a result, our management believes that our cash position, net of short term borrowings, should improve during the following quarters, however, there is no assurance this will be the case.

     As noted in the accompanying financial statements, we have Bridge Loan debt and fees totaling $8,480 which will come due in July 2005. At present, we have not initiated a process to refinance this debt, pending the proposed acquisition of the Company as discussed below. If the acquisition is not consummated prior to July 2005, we would be required to either renegotiate the terms of the Bridge Loan with the current debt holders, or seek replacement financing. Our inability to renegotiate the terms of the bridge loan, or find replacement financing would have a serious negative financial impact on the Company’s liquidity and ability to finance its operations. As a result of the aforementioned factors and related uncertainties, there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

     Our liquidity and capital resources remain a focal point of our management’s attention.

Asset Acquisitions

     As part of our business strategy, we have acquired certain assets of other companies which have had and are expected to continue to have an impact on our results of operations.

     In July 2002, through Cypress Communications, we acquired certain assets of Intermedia Advanced Building Networks, the shared tenant telecommunications services business of WorldCom, Inc (“ABN/STS”). The acquisition of ABN/STS has allowed us to extend our telecommunication services operations to over 5,700 small and medium sized business customers in 25 major metropolitan U.S. markets.

23

     In March 2003, Cypress Holding, through Cypress Communications, acquired the Southern California building-centric voice and data services business of Eureka Broadband Corporation (“Eureka”). These assets included customer contracts, as well as Eureka’s in-building networks and associated building access rights. The acquisition of the Eureka assets has allowed Cypress Holding to expand its telecommunications services operations to include over 750 small and medium sized business customers in the California market.

     In July 2003, Cypress Holding, through Cypress Communications, negotiated the surrender of certain assets from E-Building Solutions, Inc. (“E-Building”) in California, a building-centric data services business, to mitigate the loss resulting from E-Building’s default on a $450 note receivable due to Cypress Communications. These assets included customer contracts, as well as E-Building’s in-building networks and associated building access rights.

Recent Developments

     During the quarter ended September 30, 2004, management determined that we had made payments to telecommunication service providers for federal, state and local taxes and surcharges on telecommunications services for which we might be exempt. We have quantified the amount of taxes we believe were erroneously billed and paid, and are attempting to recover these taxes and surcharges directly from the telecommunications service providers involved. Although management believes that the amount of taxes and surcharges which we are entitled to recover is in the range of $1,000 to $2,500, there is no assurance that any amounts will be recovered or when any amounts will be recovered, if ever. The recovery of these taxes and surcharges will be recorded in the financial statements when the taxes and surcharges are actually recovered.

     On November 5, 2004, we entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with TechInvest Holding Company, Inc., an affiliate of Arcapita, Inc. (“Parent”), and TechInvest Acquisition, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent (“Purchaser”), pursuant to which Parent will acquire our company by the merger of Purchaser with and into us, with our company surviving the merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Parent. The total value of the transaction, at the time of the execution of the Merger Agreement, was $39,350. The Merger Agreement contains provisions for final merger consideration adjustments, upwards or downwards, based on the achievement of certain conditions pertaining to changes in certain current assets and liabilities between the execution of the Merger Agreement and closing of the transaction.

     On February 3, 2005, in recognition of the potential increase in working capital relating to the telecommunications tax recovery, we agreed with Parent to amend the Merger Agreement (the “Amendment”) to increase the merger consideration by $935, making the total value of the transaction $40,285. The parties also agreed in the Amendment, among other things, that accounts receivable attributable to the telecommunications tax recovery will be capped in light of the increase in the merger consideration for purposes of calculating the final merger consideration adjustment.

     The Merger Agreement provides that the merger consideration will first be used to repay outstanding indebtedness. The remaining consideration, after transaction expenses, will be distributed to stockholders, with an estimated price per share of $1.71, subject to final merger consideration adjustments (The $1.71 per share cash consideration is estimated by us as of December 31, 2004 and is subject to adjustment upwards or downwards pursuant to the Merger Agreement).

     The closing of the transaction is subject to certain terms and conditions customary for transactions of this type, including receipt of stockholder and regulatory approvals and other conditions.

     We incurred $597 in expenses during 2004 related to the solicitation, negotiation and completion of the sale transaction, which are recorded in general and administrative expense in the consolidated statement of operations.

24

Results of Operations

CYPRESS COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING CO., INC. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2004 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003

     The following table sets forth consolidated financial and operating data as well as the percentage of total revenues represented by certain items in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods indicated:

     REVENUES. For the year ended December 31, 2004, revenues from our telecommunications services business represented substantially all of our consolidated revenues. Revenues from this business decreased to $78,982 for the year ended December 31, 2004 from $84,626 for the year ended December 31, 2003. The decrease in revenues was the result of several factors which began in late 2002 and into 2003 as outlined below:

25

     Management believes that the rate of decline in revenues has stabilized, and that projected improvements in real estate occupancy rates in 2005, combined with stabilized employment in the general U.S. economy and the introduction of our EZ Office IP Communications offering should have a positive impact on revenue results going forward.

     REVENUES-NET. Revenues-net (after direct costs) increased to approximately $41,055 for the year ended December 31, 2004 from approximately $40,179 for the year ended December 31, 2003. Margins increased to approximately 52.0% of revenues in 2004 from approximately 47.5% in 2003, primarily due to reduced network and real estate access related costs as a percentage of revenue.

     Management believes that further improvements in margins can be achieved in the future as a result of the efforts expended to date relative to overall reduction in the cost of telecommunications network elements.

     OPERATING EXPENSES. Operating expenses decreased to approximately $37,963 for the year ended December 31, 2004 from approximately $41,479 for the year ended December 31, 2003. The decrease in operating expenses is primarily due to cost and headcount reduction initiatives implemented starting in late 2002 and into 2003. Included in operating expenses for 2004 is $597 of costs for investment banking and other costs related to the pending sale of the Company, as described above. Operating expenses decreased as a percentage of revenues to approximately 48% for the year ended December 31, 2004 from approximately 49% for the year ended December 31, 2003 as a result of operating efficiencies achieved through focused cost reduction efforts in all areas of our business. Sales and marketing expenses decreased to $2,869 for the year ended December 31, 2004 from $5,342 for the year ended December 31, 2003 due to reductions in the level of bad debt expense in 2004 as compared to 2003, and changes made to the makeup and compensation levels of our sales organization initiated in early 2004. Sales and marketing expense declined as a percentage of revenue to 4% for the year ended December 31, 2004 from approximately 6% for the year ended December 31, 2003 for the reasons noted above. General and administrative expenses decreased to $35,561 for the year ended December 31, 2004 from $37,694 for the year ended December 31, 2003 primarily due to the full year impact of cost and headcount reduction measures implemented during 2003. General and administrative expenses as a percentage of revenues was approximately 45% for both years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2004 included depreciation and amortization expense of $774 and expenses in connection with the evaluation, negotiation and closing of the pending sale of the Company of $597 as mentioned above. Depreciation and amortization expense included in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $712.

     EXTINGUISHMENT OF LIABILITIES AND OTHER CREDITS. The extinguishment of liabilities and other credits for the year ended December 31, 2004 reflects credits of $545 from settlement and extinguishment of certain liabilities assumed through our acquisition of Cypress Communications. For the year ended December 31, 2003 the extinguishment of liabilities and other credits totaled $1,995 and was comprised of credits of $1,019 resulting from negotiated settlements of certain liabilities assumed through our acquisition of Cypress Communications, the recovery of certain assets, originally valued at $0 for approximately $378, also acquired through our acquisition of Cypress Communications and the reversal of a previously recorded charge for approximately $598 resulting from the reactivation of an office facility that had been previously shut-down by our predecessor.

     OTHER INCOME AND (EXPENSE). Other income and (expense) was ($2,669) for the year ended December 31, 2004 as compared with ($2,863) during year ended December 31, 2003. Interest expense and financing costs were ($3,022) and ($2,684) for the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003

26

respectively, and consisted primarily of interest expense on debt incurred in 2002 and used in connection with the acquisition of certain assets of ABN/STS, and interest expense incurred on our revolving credit facility.

     INCOME TAXES. For the years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003, no income tax benefit from our consolidated net operating losses was recognized because of uncertainty as to whether the benefit from such net operating losses will be realized.

     NET INCOME (LOSS). Our net income for the year ended December 31, 2004 was $423. For the year ended December 31, 2003, we reported a net loss of $4,163. The improvement in net income is a direct result of the full year benefit of the cost reductions realized in both our telecommunications and real estate network cost structures, along with reductions in total operating expenses, which exceeded the net decrease in revenues realized.

CYPRESS COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING CO., INC. YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2003 COMPARED TO YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2002

     The following table sets forth consolidated financial and operating data as well as the percentage of total revenues represented by certain items in our Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods indicated:

     REVENUES. For the year ended December 31, 2003, revenues from our telecommunications services business represented substantially all of our consolidated revenues. Revenues from this business increased to approximately $84,626 for the year ended December 31, 2003 from $51,717 for the year ended December 31, 2002. The increase in revenues resulted from the full year of operations related to the customer base we acquired in July 2002 from ABN/STS, as well as the acquisitions during 2003 of the Eureka and E-Building customer base.

27

     While overall revenues increased for the year ended December 31, 2003, as indicated above, our quarterly revenues provided a downward trend. This trend was the result of several factors:

     REVENUES-NET. Revenues-net (after direct costs) increased to $40,179 for the year ended December 31, 2003 from $23,013 for the year ended December 31, 2002. Margins increased to approximately 47.5% of revenues in 2003 from approximately 44.5% in 2002, due to the increased revenue volumes acquired since July 2002, and reduced network costs as a percentage of revenue. Additionally, revenue from the customer bases acquired from Eureka and E-Buildings were substantially for internet services, which results in a lower average margin than our overall business.

     OPERATING EXPENSES. Operating expenses increased to $41,479 for the year ended December 31, 2003 from $29,766 for the year ended December 31, 2002. The increase in operating expenses is primarily due to the full year of operations in 2003 of the ABN/STS business acquired in July 2002, along with additional operating expenses related to the 2003 acquisitions of assets from Eureka and E-Building. Operating expenses decreased as a percentage of revenues to approximately 49% for the year ended December 31, 2003 from approximately 58% for the year ended December 31, 2002 as a result of operating efficiencies achieved through focused cost reduction efforts in all areas of our business. Sales and marketing expenses increased to $5,342 for the year ended December 31, 2003 from $3,977 for the year ended December 31, 2002 primarily due to the full year employment in 2003 of sales and marketing personnel we hired during 2002. Sales and marketing expense declined as a percentage of revenue to 6% for the year ended December 31, 2003 from approximately 8% for the year ended December 31, 2002 as a result of restructuring of the sales and marketing functions during 2003 and the efficiencies achieved. General and administrative expenses increased to $37,694 for the year ended December 31, 2003 from approximately $25,789 for the year ended December 31, 2002 primarily due to the full year operation of the ABN/STS business acquired in 2002. General and administrative expenses decreased as a percentage of revenues to approximately 45% for the year ended December 31, 2003 from approximately 50% for the year ended December 31, 2002 as a result of efficiencies achieved through the acquisition consolidation. General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2003 included depreciation and amortization expense of approximately $712. Depreciation and amortization expense included in general and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2002 was approximately $146.

     EXTINGUISHMENT OF LIABILITIES AND OTHER CREDITS. The extinguishment of liabilities and other charges for the year ended December 31, 2003 reflects credits for $1,019 resulting from negotiated settlements of certain liabilities assumed through our acquisition of Cypress Communications, and the recovery of certain assets, originally valued at $0 for approximately $378, also acquired through our acquisition of Cypress Communications and the reversal of a previously recorded charge for approximately $598 resulting from the reactivation of an office facility that had been previously shut-down.

     OTHER INCOME AND (EXPENSE). Other income and (expense) was ($2,863) for the year ended December 31, 2003 as compared with ($4,791) during year ended December 31, 2002. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2003 was ($2,684) and consisted primarily of interest expense on

28

debt incurred in 2002 and used in connection with acquisition of certain assets of ABN/STS. Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2002 was ($4,914) and consisted primarily of interest and finance charges incurred by Cypress Holding in connection with the acquisition of Cypress Communications in February 2002, and the acquisition of certain assets of ABN/STS in July 2002.

     DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS. There was no income or loss from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2003. Net results from our Latin American operations are included under loss from discontinued operations for the year ended December 31, 2002. Income from discontinued operations was $2,032 for the year ended December 31, 2002. The income resulted from the recognition of currency exchange gains due to the devaluation of the Argentinean peso after the Argentinean currency crashed in January 2002 and the liquidation of our Latin-American operations in March 2002.

     EXTRAORDINARY GAIN. The year ended December 31, 2002 includes an extraordinary gain of $7,783 which resulted from the elimination of all of our long-term assets in an aggregate amount of $26,840 (Note 4 to Consolidated Financial Statements).

     INCOME TAXES. For the years ended December 31, 2003 and 2002, no income tax benefit from our consolidated net operating losses was recognized because of uncertainty as to whether the benefit from such net operating losses will be realized.

     NET LOSS. Our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2003 was $4,163. For the year ended December 31, 2002, the net loss was $1,729. The increase in net loss is a direct result of the extraordinary gain of $7,783 million and income from discontinued operations of $2,032, both realized in 2002. Without the benefit of the aforementioned gains, the net loss for the year ended December 31, 2002 would have been $11,544. The network cost reductions and other cost control initiatives implemented during 2002 and 2003 combined with the full year operation of ABN/STS business acquired in 2002, resulted in a significant reduction in the operating loss from continuing operations in 2003 as compared to 2002.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

     Beginning in the first quarter of 2002 and continuing throughout 2003 and into early 2004, we initiated certain actions intended to improve liquidity and operating results. Such actions included, among other things, (i) completing the acquisition of Cypress Communications and making certain adjustments to Cypress Communications’ staffing levels and cost structure, (ii) liquidation of the operations in Argentina and Brazil, (iii) completing the purchase of certain assets of ABN/STS, (iv) raising $28 million in connection with such asset acquisition and (v) implementing an analysis and optimization project of our telecommunications network and real estate access costs which have resulted in substantial reductions in these cost elements in both absolute terms and as a percentage of revenue.

     Our primary sources of liquidity have been proceeds from the issuance of our common stock, convertible debentures, lines of credit and bridge loans, as well as proceeds from the sale of our former North American telecommunications rights operations in December 2000 and cash acquired through our acquisition of Cypress Communications in February 2002.

29

     The following table shows information about our cash flows and liquidity positions as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2004 and 2003. You should read this table and the discussion that follows in conjunction with our consolidated statements of cash flows contained in Item 8 of this report.

     For the year ended December 31, 2004, the increase in cash provided by operating activities is primarily attributable to the fact that we recorded net income in 2004 versus a net loss in 2003. The decrease in net cash used in investing activities is reflective of the fact that we acquired business assets of both Eureka and E-Building during 2003, and had no comparable acquisition activity during 2004 outside of capital expenditures to support our current business. Net cash provided by financing activities increased slightly in 2004 as we financed some of our capital expenditures with debt borrowings.

     Management believes that our cash position should stabilize during the following quarters as actions initiated starting in 2002 and continuing through early 2004 to reduce our costs have resulted in profitability which we believe is sustainable in the near term. We cannot, however, give any assurance that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flows from operations or financing activities to cover our future costs of operations or to operate on a profitable basis. Likewise, no assurance can be given that we can generate sufficient cash flow from operations or financing activities to support our debt service obligations, including debt raised in connection with our acquisition of certain assets from ABN/STS. Moreover, the terms of the indebtedness we incurred in connection with the acquisition of certain assets from ABN/STS contain restrictive covenants that limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends or undertake certain other transactions. We have also pledged certain assets as security under our Senior Credit Facility. Therefore, we must devote a substantial portion of our cash flow to service our indebtedness and cannot utilize that cash flow for operations. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that we will have sufficient liquidity to implement our business plan. Likewise, there can also be no assurance that we will be able to obtain cash through future financing activities on acceptable terms, or at all, or that we will ever become profitable.

     As noted in the accompanying financial statements, we have Bridge Loan debt and fees totaling $8,480 which will come due in July 2005. At present, we have not initiated a process to refinance this debt, pending the proposed acquisition of the Company as discussed elsewhere in this report. Should that acquisition fail to be completed as currently contemplated, we would be required to either renegotiate the terms of the Bridge Loan with the current debt holders, or seek replacement financing. Our inability to renegotiate the terms of the Bridge Loan, or find replacement financing would have a serious negative financial impact on the Company’s liquidity and ability to finance its operations.

     As of December 31, 2004, we had cash and cash equivalents of $215 as compared to $1,900 at December 31, 2003. In addition, at December 31, 2004 we had approximately $5,000 of borrowing availability under the terms of our senior credit facility. Management attempts to balance cash balances on-hand, and anticipated cash needs with the availability under the Senior Credit Facility so as to minimize interest and finance charges incurred. Our business has some seasonality primarily attributable to usage charges for voice services, which generally decline during holiday periods such as Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Years and during the summer months; however, the effects of such seasonality have not had, and are not expected to have, a material impact on our liquidity. Assuming that we are able to either renegotiate the terms of the Bridge Loan, or find replacement financing, cash generated from operations,

30

along with the availability under our line of credit, is expected to be sufficient to fund our operations for at least the next twelve months.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

     The following table contains information relating to our contractual obligations and commitments for the five years subsequent to December 31, 2004 and thereafter. The amounts represent the maximum future contractual obligations and are reported without giving effect to any related discounts, premiums and other adjustments necessary to comply with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. In addition, we have an unused line of credit outstanding totaling approximately $7,400 at December 31, 2004 subject to certain borrowing base limitations.

     (2) The Convertible Notes accrue interest at the rate of 7.5% per annum, compounded quarterly, and payable at maturity of the notes, whether upon their stated maturity of July 1, 2009, or earlier as a result of acceleration in the event of a default or upon redemption of the Convertible Notes. The principal of and accrued interest on the Convertible Notes is convertible into our common stock at $1.13 per share. The Convertible Notes are redeemable by us at any time by payment of the outstanding principal balance and accrued interest. In the event that the Convertible Notes are redeemed, the Purchasers have been issued warrants which will then be eligible for exercise to purchase the number of shares of our common stock that the Convertible Notes were convertible into on the redemption date at a conversion price of $1.13 per share.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

     We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that are material to investors.

Critical Accounting Policies

     “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” are based upon our Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. We are required to make, in the preparation of

31

the Consolidated Financial Statements, estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We have reviewed the accounting policies used in reporting our financial results on a regular basis. Management has reviewed the accounting policies and related disclosures with our Audit Committee.

     The following is not intended to be a comprehensive list of all of our accounting policies. Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In many cases, the accounting treatment of a particular transaction is specifically dictated by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, with no need for management’s judgment in their application. There are also areas in which management’s judgment in selecting an available alternative would not produce a materially different result.

     We have identified the following as accounting policies critical to us:

ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

     The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect that reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

     Cash equivalents consist of short-term, highly liquid investments that mature in three months or less, which are readily convertible into cash.

PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND DEPRECIATION

     Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives of the assets (three to seven years) by straight-line methods for financial reporting purposes. Depreciation of leasehold improvements is computed over the lesser of the estimated useful lives of the assets or the term of the lease by the straight-line method for financial reporting purposes.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

     The Company’s revenues include recurring charges for local access, long-distance, equipment rental, Internet access, digital satellite business television, voicemail, inbound 800, and other enhanced voice and data services, which are recognized as services provided. Revenues also include nonrecurring charges for installations and moves, adds, and changes. Installation fees represent the initial cost charged by Cypress Communications for installing voice phone lines, data lines, and business class cable television in the tenant’s premises. Move, add, and change (“MAC”) charges are for the Company’s labor and materials related to moving, adding, or changing a customer’s services. Installation and MAC charges are recognized when the services are provided as they represent a separate earnings process. Revenues are net of certain credits and discounts. Deferred revenue represents monthly recurring charges received in advance.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

     The Company follows The Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (“SFAS No. 123”), amended by SFAS No. 148, ”Accounting for Stock Based compensation – Transition and Disclosure”. SFAS No. 123 encourages companies to recognize expense for stock options and other stock-based employee compensation plans based on their fair value at the date of grant. As permitted by SFAS No. 123, the Company has and will retain its prior accounting policy under APB Opinion Number 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and, accordingly, compensation expense for stock options is measured as the excess, if any, of the fair value of the Company’s stock at the date of grant over the exercise price.

     FASB Statement 123, Accounting for Stock Based Compensation, requires the Company to provide pro forma information regarding net income and earnings per share as if compensation cost for the Company’s stock option plan has been determined in accordance with the fair value based method prescribed in FASB Statement 123. The Company estimates the fair value of each stock option at the grant date by using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions used for grants in both 2004, 2003 and 2002: no dividends yield for all years; expected volatility of 100%, 100% and 74%, respectively; risk-free interest rate of 4.26%, 3.0% and 4.42%, respectively and expected life of 7 years for all periods.

FAIR VALUES OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

     The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and notes. The carrying amounts of such financial instruments as reflected in the balance sheet approximate their estimated fair value as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 due to their short-term nature. The estimated fair value is not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Company could realize in a current market exchange or of future earnings or cash flows.

VALUATION OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS

     On January 1, 2002, the Company adopted FASB Statement No. 144 “Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“FAS No. 144”). Under FAS 144, the Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment when circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable based on the undiscounted future cash flows of the asset. If the carrying amount of the asset is determined not to be recoverable, a write-down to fair value is recorded.

INCOME TAXES

     Income taxes are accounted for under FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes” (“FAS 109”). FAS 109 is an asset and liability approach that requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been recognized in our financial statements or tax returns. In estimating future tax consequences, FAS 109 generally considers all expected future events other than proposed changes in the tax laws or rates. Valuation allowances are provided if it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized.

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE — BASIC AND DILUTED

     Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is calculated by dividing the income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, without consideration for common stock equivalents. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding for the period. Shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options (3,462, 3,897 and 3,770 shares in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively) and warrants (1,742, 2,346 and 3,143 shares

32

in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively) and shares issued upon conversion of convertible notes (10,619, 9,859 and 9,153 in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively) are antidilutive and are not included in the computation of shares outstanding.

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

     The Company follows SFAS No. 130, “Reporting Comprehensive Income” (“SFAS 130”). SFAS 130 establishes standards for reporting comprehensive income or loss and its components in the consolidated financial statements. Comprehensive income (loss), as defined, includes all changes in equity (net assets) during a period from non-owner sources. To date, the Company has reported other comprehensive income from the cumulative effect on exchange rates for the amount of $0 in 2004, $0 in 2003 and $(2,170) in 2002. The Company had no other material transactions that are required to be reported in comprehensive income or loss.

SEGMENT REPORTING

     The Company operates in one business segment — the provision of telecommunication services to small and medium sized businesses on an integrated basis.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

     On December 16, 2004, the FASB issued Statement 123 (revised 2004) that will require compensation costs related to share-based payment transactions to be recognized in the financial statements. With limited exceptions, the amount of compensation cost will be measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. In addition, liability awards will be re measured each reporting period. Compensation cost will be recognized over the period that an employee provides service in exchange for the award. Statement 123(R) replaces FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees. The effective date for this requirement is as of the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. The company has not estimated the impact of adopting this revised standard on the financial statements.

     In November 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 151, “Inventory Costs an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.” SFAS No. 151 clarifies that abnormal amounts of idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and wasted materials (or spoilage) should be recognized as current-period charges and requires the allocation of fixed production overheads to inventory based on the normal capacity of the production facilities. SFAS No. 151 is effective for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. It is not expected that the adoption of SFAS No. 151 to have any effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

     In December 2003, the FASB issued a revision to FASB Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities” (FIN 46-R). FIN 46 is an Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin 51, “Consolidated Financial Statements” and addresses consolidation by business enterprises of variable interest entities (VIEs) that possess certain characteristics. The revision clarifies the definition in the original release that potentially could have classified any business as a VIE. The revision also delays the effective date of the Interpretation from the first reporting following December 15, 2003 to the first reporting period ending after March 15, 2004. The revision was effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2004. NoVIEs have been identified and, accordingly, the application of the Interpretation did not have an effect on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

     We are exposed to interest rate changes, primarily as a result any borrowing under our line of credit facility which has a variable interest rate equal to the prime rate, as announced from time to time by Silicon Valley Bank, plus 2.0%. No action has been taken to cover our interest rate market risk, and we are not a party to any interest rate market risk management activities.

     Our long term debt at December 31, 2004, carries interest rates, which are fixed. Our line of credit pursuant to our senior credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank carries interest rates, which vary with the prime rate. Accordingly, any increases in the prime rate will reduce our earnings. A 1% increase in the prime rate on the $2,576 million outstanding under our line of credit at December 31, 2004 would result in an annual interest expense increase of $26.

33

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

TABLE

34

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Cypress Communications Holding Company, Inc.:

     We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cypress Communications Holding Company, Inc. and subsidiaries (“the Company” formerly U.S. RealTel, Inc.) as of December 31, 2004 and 2003 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

     We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

     In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

     The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses from operations and is in an unfavorable working capital and uncertain liquidity position that raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 2. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of asset carrying amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might result should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Atlanta, GA
April 15, 2005

35

CYPRESS COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING CO., INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET

December 31, 2004 and 2003

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

36

CYPRESS COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING CO., INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

Years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

37

CYPRESS COMMUNICATIONS HOLDING CO., INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(All dollar and share amounts are presented in thousands, except per share amounts)

38