Rose Explorations 10KSB 9-30-07
 
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
 

 
FORM 10-KSB
 

 
x
ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007

¨
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
 
For the transition period from                      to                      
 
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 333-140299 

 
ROSE EXPLORATIONS INC.
(Exact Name of Small Business as Specified in its Charter)
 

 
 
Nevada                                                                                                     98-0425627
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)                  (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
 
  33158 Myrtle Avenue
Mission, BC, Canada V2V  5W1
                        (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

                             Issuer's telephone number, including area code: (604) 783-5176

 
                             Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None.
 
                         Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share.
 

 
Check whether the issuer is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act:  ¨ 
 
Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  YES  x    NO  ¨ 
 
Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-KSB or any amendment to this Form 10-KSB:  ¨
 
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  YES x  NO   ¨
 
Issuer is a development stage company and has had no revenues since inception.
 
Issuer is a non-accelerated Filer.
 
The Issuer's securities are listed on the OTCBB under the trading symbol ROEX; however, trading has not yet commenced. The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates
has been computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold: $100,000. As of September 30, 2007, the Issuer had a total of 18, 500,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share, issued and
outstanding.
 
    Documents incorporated by reference: Please see Part III, Item 2. Description of Exhibits for certain exhibits required to be filed hereunder, which are incorporated herein by this reference, and included in their entirety, in
    our Form SB-2 registration statement, filed with the SEC on January 30, 2007, under SEC File No. 333-140299.
 
    Transitional Small Business Disclosure Format (check one):  Yes  ¨    No  x 

 
1


TABLE OF CONTENTS
 
         
PART I
  
3
 
  
Item 1. Description of Business
  
3
 
  
Item 2. Description of Property
  
5
 
  
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
  
5
 
  
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
  
5
PART II
  
5
 
  
Item 5. Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Small Business Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
  
5
 
  
Item 6. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation
  
6
 
  
Item 7. Financial Statements
  
10
 
  
Item 8. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
  
23
 
  
Item 8A. Controls and Procedures
  
23
 
  
Item 8B. Other Information
  
23
PART III
  
23
 
  
Item 9. Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance With Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
  
23
 
  
Item 10. Executive Compensation
  
25
 
  
Item 11. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
  
26
 
  
Item 12. Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence
  
26
 
  
Item 13. Exhibits
  
27
 
  
Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services
  
27
SIGNATURES
  
28
 
 

 
2


PART I
 
Description of Business 
 
General
 
Rose Explorations Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on December 5, 2003 under the name Computer Maid, Inc. In February 2006, we changed our name to Rose Explorations Inc. and commenced business operations. We were incorporated for the purpose to promote and carry on any lawful business for which a corporation may be incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada. Our primary goal is to engage in the acquisition, exploration and development of natural resource properties, beginning with our current mining claims in the State of Nevada.
 
In February 2006, we acquired the Rose Prospect Lode Mining Claim in Clark County Nevada and in June 2006, we staked the Rose Prospect II Lode Mining Claim adjacent to the west of the Rose Lode Claim to cover other indicated mineralized zones observed in that area.
 
We are a relatively new company and, as such, are considered to be a junior mining company. It is common practice in the mining industry for a junior mining company to complete exploration activities on a property to determine if any minerals exist. At such time as mineralization is located, a junior mining company then attempts to recruit a major mining company, with ample cash reserves and equipment, to assist in the development of a property. As a junior mining company, we intend to conduct exploration activities on our properties and, if warranted, will seek a major mining company to joint venture in any development and/or production. However, since we are in the early stages of exploration activities, there is no guarantee we will locate any mineralization on our properties or, if mineralization is located in a quantity sufficient to warrant development, there is no guarantee we will be able to recruit a major mining company to join us as a joint venture partner. In the event we are unable to enter into a joint venture agreement with a major mining company to assist in the development of our properties, as a junior mining company with limited cash reserves, we will likely be required to raise additional monies, either through sales of our equity securities or through loans from financial institutions or third parties, prior to commencement of any development activities on our properties.
 
Description of our Properties and Mining Claims
 
On February 21, 2006 we acquired the Rose Prospect Lode Mining Claim (“Rose Lode Claim”) in the Yellow Pine Mining District in Clark County, Nevada. In May 2006, we commissioned a geological evaluation report of the claim and in June 2006, we commissioned the Phase I work program recommended by the evaluation report. During the Phase I work program, we staked a claim "Rose Prospect II Lode Mining Claim" adjacent to the west of the Rose Lode Claim to cover other indicated mineralized zones observed in that area.

The Rose Lode Claim is comprised of one located claim with an area of 20 acres located in the Goodsprings (Yellow Pine) Mining District situated within the southwestern comer of the State of Nevada, U.S.A. The Rose Lode Claim covers some former exploratory workings on a mineral showing.

The Yellow Pine Mining District is located in the area of the Spring Mountains of southern Nevada. Although less famous than many of the other mining districts of the Great Basin it nevertheless ranks second only to Tonopah in total Nevada lead and zinc production. During World War I this district was one of the most productive in the West, but by the end of World War II only a few mines remained in operation. The region is known for its historic production of lead, zinc, silver and gold.

The Rose Lode Claim is underlain by the Mississippian Monte Cristo Limestone Formation with the mineralization possibly comprised of copper minerals hosted by a breccia zone which may be up to 200 feet wide within the Anchor Limestone Member.

A program of trenching, sampling, geophysical and geochemical surveys, and diamond drilling is recommended to explore for, and delineate potentially economic copper bearing mineral zones on the Rose Lode claim.

Our Proposed Exploration Program 

The results of the Phase I exploration program on the Rose Claim Group in that the mineralization and the sampling results from the Rose workings and from the Trenches I and II on the Rose Lode Claim indicate potential economic zones of mineralization. The sample from Trench III returned barely anomalous zinc assay, however, the site will be further examined in the second phase of exploration. The fracture trend is northeasterly correlating with the trend of the heavily mineralized breccia zones in the immediate area; as at the Whale Mine. Thus the control to the mineralization on the Rose Lode Claim is structural. Based on our evaluations to date, we have concluded that Phase II of the exploration program on the Rose Lode Claim should be initiated and completed. This program of localized VLF-EM surveys, soil sampling and geological mapping should define the structural trend to the extensions of the known mineral zones and provide more geological information as to the location of heavily mineralized surficial or near sub-surface zones.

Exploration work on our properties has indicated that mineral occurrences exist in the area of our properties; however, further exploration is needed to determine what amount of minerals, if any, exist and if any minerals which are found can be economically extracted and profitably processed.
 
 
3


 
The exploration program on our Rose Lode Claim has been designed to economically explore and evaluate this claim which, in our opinion, may merit development.

We do not claim to have any mineralization or reserves whatsoever at this time on any of our properties; however, based on preliminary research and geological reports on our properties and the surrounding area, we believe there is a sufficient basis to engage in exploration activities.

The following table summarizes the recommended exploration program and estimated costs:

Phase II
VLF-EM and soil geochemical surveys, sampling and
geological mapping of the veins within anomalous zones                                                $  7,500

Phase III
            Test diamond drilling of the prime target                                                                             $30,000

            Total Estimated Exploration Costs                                                                                        $37,500
 
Environmental Regulations 
 
Environmental laws and regulations relating to public lands are expected to be tightly enforced. We intend to explore and, when required, develop all of our properties in strict compliance with all environmental requirements applicable to the mineral processing and mining industry. We will secure all the necessary permits for exploration and, if development is warranted, will file final Plans of Operation prior to the commencement of any mining operations. We anticipate no discharge of water into any active stream, creek, river, lake or any other body of water regulated by environmental law or regulation. No significant endangered species will be disturbed. Re-contouring and re-vegetation of disturbed surface areas will be completed pursuant to all legal requirements. Any portals, adits or shafts will be sealed should the property be abandoned.

It is difficult to estimate the cost of compliance with environmental laws at this time, since the full nature and extent of our proposed activities cannot be determined until we receive the proceeds of this Offering and commence our operations. At that time, we will determine what that will involve from an environmental standpoint and will begin our compliance efforts.
 
Government Regulations
 
We will be subject to all the laws, rules and regulations which govern the mineral processing and mining industry in the State of Nevada and intend to fully comply with all environmental, health and safety laws, rules, regulations and statutes.

Specifically, the proposed exploration of the property will be governed by the State of Nevada Mining laws, rules and regulations. We will determine and comply with all rules and regulations governing operations prior to commencement of any exploration activities subject to permitting and/or licensing.
 
Competition
 
The mining industry is highly fragmented and competitive. We are competing with many other exploration companies looking for gold and other minerals. Our Company is among the smallest exploration companies in existence and is an infinitely small participant in the exploration business, which is the foundation of the mining industry. While we generally compete with other exploration companies, there is no competition for the exploration or removal of minerals from its current claims or properties. Readily available commodities markets exist around the world for the sale of minerals. Therefore, if we discover mineralization on our properties, we would likely be able to sell the minerals in the market.
 
Employees and Employment Agreements
 
At present, we have no employees. Our President is also the Secretary and Treasurer and Director. Our Company also has a Vice President of Exploration, who is also a Director. Both our officers and directors devote their time as required to our business operations. The President and our Vice President Exploration are not presently compensated for their services and do not have an employment agreements with us. Once the Exploration Program begins, we expect to hire independent contractors to fulfill the roles of Project Geologist and Field Assistant; however, we have not yet placed any ads or interviewed for these positions. We presently do not have pension, health, annuity, insurance, stock options, profit sharing or similar benefit plans; however, may adopt such plans in the future. There are presently no personal benefits available to any officers, directors or employees.
 
 
4

 
 
Description of Property 
 
We do not own any property, other than the mineral claims described above.
 
 
Legal Proceedings 

We are currently unaware of any legal matters pending or threatened against us.
 
 
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 

None.

PART II
 
Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Small Business Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities 
 
Market Information
 
Our shares of common stock are listed on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board (symbol ROEX; however, trading has not yet commenced. Therefore, no table of high/low bid prices is presented in this report.
 
Number of Holders
 
As of September 30, 2007, the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock was held by a total of thirty (30) shareholders of record.
 
Dividends
 
We have not paid any cash dividends since our inception and do not foresee declaring any dividend on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
 
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
 
None.
 
Purchase of our Equity Securities by Officers and Directors
 
None.
 
Other Stockholder Matters
 
None.
 
 
 
5


Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation 
 
You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with (1) our financial statements, including the notes thereto, included in this Report, and (2) the “Risk Factors” section of our Registration Statement on Form SB2, filed in January, 2007 and this Form 10K-SB. Some of the information contained in this Report may contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). This information may involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by any forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements which involve assumptions and describe our future plans, strategies and expectations, are generally identifiable by the use of the words “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “believe,” “intend” or “project” or the negative of these words or other variations on these words or comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements are based on assumptions that may be incorrect, and there can be no assurance that the projections included in these forward-looking statements will come to pass. Our actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. We undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any reason, even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future.
 
Summary Financial Data
 
 
  
For year ended
September 30,
2007
 
 
For year ended
September 30,
2006
 
 
Statements of Operations Data:
 
  
   
 
   
Revenues
 
  
0
 
 
0
 
Acquisition of mineral property
 
 
0
   
6,375
 
General and administrative expenses
 
  
64,567
 
 
27,690
 
Exploration costs and expenses
 
 
0
   
6,125
 
Net loss
 
  
(64,567
)
 
(40,190
)
Net loss per common share—basic and diluted
 
  
(0.005
)
 
(0.006
)
Weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding
 
  
13,506,831
 
 
6,273,973
 
 
Balance Sheet Data:
 
  
   
 
   
Cash and cash equivalents
 
  
42,170
 
 
3,000
 
Working capital surplus (deficit)
 
  
37,493
 
 
(6,940
)
Total assets
 
  
42,170
 
 
3,000
 
Accumulated deficit
 
  
(105,507
)
 
(40,940
)
 
 
6

 
Overview
 
We have incurred net losses since our inception and expect to incur substantial and increasing losses for the next several years as we expand our exploration activities and move into later stages of development. Since inception, we have incurred an accumulated deficit of $105,507. We have funded our losses to date through the sale of equity securities and advances from stockholders.
 
Results of Operations — 2007 compared to 2006
 
We are a start-up company currently in the exploration and development stage and have not generated any revenues since inception.
 
General and administrative expense consists mainly of consulting fees, legal and accounting fees, management fees, rent, licenses and permits and miscellaneous filing fees and expenses incurred in the day-to-day operation of our business. General and administrative expenses increased to $64,567 for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2007, compared to $27,690 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006. The majority of the increase was mainly due to legal and accounting fees in the amount of $28,524, as compared to $3,040 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 and consulting fees of $7,500, compared to $0 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006. The increase in legal, accounting and consulting fees were incurred in the current year in connection with the preparation and filing of our Form SB-2 registration statement with the SEC and continuing period reports.
 
We did not have any cash interest income or expense.
 
Liquidity and Capital Resources — 2007 compared to 2006
 
At September 30, 2007, we had available cash in the bank of $42,170, compared to $3,000 at September 30, 2006.
 
Cash used in operations was $45,830 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007, compared with $7,000 for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007. This increase in negative cash flow from operations was primarily caused by a significant increase in legal and accounting fees, as described above.
 
Financing activities in 2007 consisted of the issuance of 8,500,000 shares of common stock for proceeds of $85,000 pursuant to a public offering of our securities, filed with the SEC and made effective on February 20, 2007.
 
The Company continues to search for additional sources of capital, as and when needed; however, there can be no assurance funding will be successfully obtained. Even if it is obtained, there is no assurance that it will not be secured on terms that are highly dilutive to existing shareholders.
 
Debt
 
At September 30, 2007, we owed $14,700 to an officer and director of the company for management fees resulting from services rendered and accrued rent. Please see Notes 5 and 8 to our audited financial statements in Item 7, for a more detailed description of these transactions.
 
Our actual cash needs might vary materially from those now planned because of a number of factors, including:
 
 
 
The scope, rate of progress and costs of our exploration and development activities;
 
 
 
Changes in our research, exploration and/or development plans;
 
 
 
The terms and timing of any collaborative, licensing and/or other arrangements that we may establish;
 
 
 
The cost and timing of regulatory approvals; and
 
  
 
 
The cost of filing, prosecuting, defending and enforcing any claims against our property rights.
 
We currently believe our cash in the bank will allow us to complete our initial Phase I exploration activities, after which we intend to raise substantial additional capital to fund our development and operations activities. We expect to finance our future cash needs through the sale of equity securities and possibly strategic collaborations or debt financing or through other sources that may be dilutive to existing stockholders.

If and when we seek to raise additional money to fund our operations, funding may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to raise additional funds when needed, we may not be able to continue our planned exploration and development activities, or we could be required to delay, scale back or eliminate some or all of our research, exploration and development programs. If we raise additional funds through equity sales, these sales may be highly dilutive to existing investors.
 
 
7


 
Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates
 
Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and reflect the application of certain significant accounting policies as described in Note 2 to our audited financial statements and critical accounting policies as described below. A “critical accounting policy” is one which is both important to the portrayal of our financial condition and results and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.
 
Use of Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
 
Net Loss per Share
 
We compute net income (loss) per share in accordance with SFAS No.128, “Earnings per Share”. SFAS No. 128 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.
 
Mineral Property Costs
 
We have been in the exploration stage since inception and have not yet realized any revenues from planned operations. We are engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mining properties. Mineral property acquisition and exploration costs are charged to operations as incurred. When it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven and probable reserves, the costs incurred to develop such property, are capitalized. Such costs will be amortized using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the probable reserve. Although we have taken steps to verify title to mineral properties in which we have an interest, according to the usual industry standards for the stage of exploration of such properties, these procedures do not guarantee title. Such properties may be subject to prior agreements or transfers and title may be affected by undetected defects.
 
Reclamation Costs
 
Our policy for recording reclamation costs is to record a liability for the estimated costs to reclaim mined land by recording charges to production costs for each tonne of ore mined over the life of the mine. The amount charged is based on management’s estimation of reclamation costs to be incurred. The accrued liability will be reduced as reclamation expenditures are made. Certain reclamation work will be performed concurrently with mining and these expenditures will be charged to operations at that time.
 
Material Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
We have no material commitments for capital expenditures and no off-balance sheet arrangements.
 
Risk Factors
 
The material risks affecting our company and our common stock are set forth in detail in our initial Form SB-2 Registration Statement, which can be found in its entirety on the SEC website at www.sec.gov under our SEC File No. 333-140299. Those risk factors are incorporated herein by this reference and are not being restated; however, we have updated or added the following additional material risk factors:
 
Risks Related to Our Financial Results and Need for Additional Financing
 
Our auditors’ reports contain a statement that our net loss and limited working capital raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.
 
Our independent registered public accountants have stated in their report, included in Item 7. Financial Statements, that our significant operating losses and working capital deficit raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We had net losses of $64,567 and $40,190, respectively, for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. Our accumulated deficit from inception to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 was $105,507. We will be required to raise substantial capital to fund our capital expenditures, working capital, and other cash requirements since our current cash assets are expected to last only through December 31, 2008. We continue to search for sources of additional funding, including seeking potential joint venture partners, while we continue the initial exploration phase on our mining claims. The successful outcome of future financing activities cannot be determined at this time and there are no assurances that, if achieved, we will have sufficient funds to execute our intended business plan or generate positive operational results.
 
 
 
8

 
 
We will likely need additional capital to achieve our current business strategy and our inability to obtain additional financing will inhibit our ability to expand or even maintain our research, exploration and development efforts.
 
In addition to our current accumulated deficit, we expect to incur additional losses during the foreseeable future. Until we are able to determine if there are mineral deposits available for extraction on our properties, we are unlikely to be profitable. Consequently, we will require substantial additional capital to continue our exploration and development activities. We believe our current cash in the bank will allow us to complete our planned exploration activities for the calendar year 2008; however, there is no assurance we will not incur additional and unplanned expenses. When additional funding is required, we intend to raise funds either through private placements or public offerings of our equity securities. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional financing through private placements and/or public offerings necessary to support our working capital requirements. To the extent that funds generated from any private placements and/or public offerings are insufficient, we will have to raise additional working capital through other sources, such as bank loans and/or financings. No assurance can be given that additional financing will be available, or if available, will be on acceptable terms.
 
If we are unable to secure adequate sources of funds, we may be forced to delay or postpone the exploration, development and research of our properties, and as a result, we might be required to diminish or suspend our business plans. These delays in development would have an adverse effect on our ability to generate revenues and could require us to possibly cease operations. In addition, such inability to obtain financing on reasonable terms could have a negative effect on our business, operating results or financial condition to such extent that we are forced to restructure, file for bankruptcy protection, sell assets or cease operations, any of which could put your investment dollars at significant risk.
 
We incur increased costs as a result of being a publicly company.
 
As a publicly listed and trading company, we are incurring significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as well as new rules subsequently implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission, have required changes in corporate governance practices of public companies. These new rules and regulations have increased our legal and financial compliance costs and have made some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, as a result of becoming a public company, we adopted policies regarding internal controls and disclosure controls and procedures. In addition, these new rules and regulations have made it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, which we currently cannot afford to do. As a result of the new rules, it may become more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our Board of Directors or as executive officers. We cannot predict or estimate the amount of additional costs we may incur as a result of being a public company or the timing of such costs.

 
 
 
 
9

 
 

 

Financial Statements 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 


Rose Explorations Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)

Financial Statements
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
30 September 2007

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
10


 
 

James Stafford 
 
   
 

James Stafford
Chartered Accountants
Suite 350 - 1111 Melville Street
Vancouver, British Columbia
Canada V6E 3V6
Telephone +1 604 669 0711
Facsimile +1 604 669 0754
 
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of  
Rose Explorations Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)

We have audited the balance sheets of Rose Explorations Inc. (the “Company”) as at 30 September 2007 and 2006, and the related statements of operations, cash flows and changes in stockholders’ equity for the years then ended and for the period from the date of inception on 5 December 2003 to 30 September 2007. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
 
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States of America). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
 
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of 30 September 2007 and 2006 and the results of its operations, cash flows and changes in stockholders’ equity for the years then ended and for the period from the date of inception on 5 December 2003 to 30 September 2007 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, conditions exist which raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern unless it is able to generate sufficient cash flows to meet its obligations and sustain its operations. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

 

                                                                                                                                                                                 /s/ James Stafford
Vancouver, Canada                                                                                                                                           Chartered Accountants

29 November 2007
 
 
11

 
Rose Explorations Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Balance Sheets
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

   
As at 30 September 2007
 
As at 30 September 2006
   
$
 
$
         
Assets
       
         
Current
       
Cash and cash equivalents
 
42,170
 
3,000
         
   
42,170
 
3,000 
         
Liabilities
       
         
Current
       
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (Note 4)
 
4,677
 
9,940
         
Stockholders’ equity
       
Capital stock (Note 6)
       
Authorized
       
75,000,000 of common shares, par value $0.001
       
Issued and outstanding
       
2007 - 18,500,000 common shares, par value $0.001
       
2006 - 10,000,000 common shares, par value $0.001
 
18,500
 
10,000
Additional paid-in capital
 
124,500
 
24,000
Deficit, accumulated during the development stage
 
(105,507)
 
(40,940)
         
   
37,493
 
(6,940) 
         
   
42,170
 
3,000

Nature and Continuance of Operations (Note 1)

On behalf of the Board:

/s/ Greg Cowan  Director  
12


Rose Exploratisons Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Statements of Operation
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 
For the period from the date of inception on 5 December 2003 to 30 September 2007
 
For the year ended 30 September 2007
 
For the year ended 30 September 2006
 
For the year ended 30 September 2005
 
$
 
$
 
$
 
$
               
Expenses
             
Acquisition of mineral property (Note 3)
6,375
 
-
 
6,375
 
-
Bank charges
379
 
379
 
-
 
-
Consulting (Note 5)
7,500
 
7,500
 
-
 
-
Exploration and development (Note 3)
6,125
 
-
 
6,125
 
-
Filing fees
1,534
 
1,534
 
-
 
-
Legal and accounting
31,564
 
28,524
 
3,040
 
-
Licences and permits
1,100
 
-
 
550
 
200
Management fees (Notes 5 and 8)
36,000
 
18,000
 
18,000
 
-
Registered agent
400
 
100
 
100
 
100
Rent (Notes 5 and 8)
12,000
 
6,000
 
6,000
 
-
Transfer agent
2,530
 
2,530
 
-
 
-
               
Net loss for the period
(105,507)
 
(64,567)
 
(40,190) 
 
(300) 
               
Basic and diluted loss per common share
   
(0.005)
 
(0.006)
 
(300)
               
Weighted average number of common shares used in per share calculations
   
13,506,831
 
6,273,973
 
1


 
 
 
 
 
 
 
13


Rose Explorations Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Statements of Cash Flows
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

   
For the period from the date of inception on 5 December 2003 to 30 September 2007
 
For the year ended 30 September 2007
 
For the year ended 30 September 2006
 
For the year ended 30 September 2005
   
$
 
$
 
$
 
$
                 
Cash flows from operating activities
               
Net loss for the period
 
(105,507)
 
(64,567)
 
(40,190)
 
(300)
Adjustments to reconcile loss to net cash used by operating activities
               
Contributions to capital by related
parties (Notes 5 and 8)
 
48,000
 
24,000
 
24,000
 
-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
               
(Decrease) Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities
 
4,677
 
(5,263)
 
9,190
 
300
                 
   
(52,830)
 
(45,830)
 
(7,000)
 
-
                 
Cash flows from financing activities
               
Common shares issued for cash
 
95,000
 
85,000
 
10,000
 
-
Common shares redeemed
 
-
 
-
 
(1)
 
-
                 
   
95,000
 
85,000
 
9,999
 
-
                 
Increase in cash and cash equivalents
 
42,170
 
39,170
 
2,999
 
-
                 
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period
 
-
 
3,000
 
1
 
1
                 
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period
 
42,170
 
42,170
 
3,000
 
1

Supplemental Disclosures with Respect to Cash Flows (Note 8)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
14

Rose Explorations Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 
Number of shares issued
Share capital
Additional paid in capital
Deficit, accumulated during the development stage
Stockholders’ equity
       
$
 
$
 
$
 
$
                     
Balance at 5 December 2003 (inception)
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
-
Common share issued for cash ($1 per share) (Note 6)
 
1
 
-
 
1
 
-
 
1
Net loss for the period
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
(450)
 
(450)
                     
Balance at 30 September 2004
 
1
 
-
 
1
 
(450)
 
(449)
Net loss for the year
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
(300)
 
(300)
                     
Balance at 30 September 2005
 
1
 
-
 
1
 
(750)
 
(749)
Common shares issued for cash ($0.001 per share) (Note 6)
 
10,000,000
 
10,000
 
-
 
-
 
10,000
Common shares redeemed - cash ($1 per share) (Note 6)
 
(1)
 
-
 
(1)
 
-
 
(1)
Contributions to capital by related
parties - expenses (Notes 5 and 8)
 
-
 
-
 
24,000
 
-
 
24,000
Net loss for the year
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
(40,190)
 
(40,190)
                     
Balance at 30 September 2006
 
10,000,000
 
10,000
 
24,000
 
(40,940)
 
(6,940)

Common shares issued for cash ($0.001 per share) (Note 6)
 
8,500,000
 
8,500
 
76,500
 
-
 
85,000
Contributions to capital by related
parties - expenses (Notes 5 and 8)
 
-
 
-
 
24,000
 
-
 
24,000
Net loss for the year
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
(64,567)
 
(64,567)
                     
Balance at 30 September 2007
 
18,500,000
 
18,500
 
124,500
 
(105,507)
 
37,493







15


 
Rose Explorations Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
September 30,  2007
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________


Nature and Continuance of Operations
 
               
       Rose Explorations Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on 5 December 2003. The Company changed its name to Rose Explorations Inc.
       from Computer Maid, Inc. on 13 February 2006. The Company was incorporated for the purpose to promote and carry on any lawful business for which a corporation may be
       incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada.
 
  The Company is a development stage enterprise, as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board No. 7. The Company is devoting all of its present efforts in securing and   
   establishing a new business, and its planned principle operations have not commenced, and, accordingly, no revenue has been derived during the organization period.
 
   The Company’s financial statements as at 30 September 2007 and for the year then ended have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of
   assets and the settlement of liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The Company has a loss of $64,567 for the year ended 30 September 2007 (2006 -
   $40,190, 2005 - $300) and has working capital of $37,493 at 30 September 2007 (and a working capital deficit at 30 September 2006 - $6,940).
 
   Management cannot provide assurance that the Company will ultimately achieve profitable operations or become cash flow positive, or raise additional debt and/or equity
   capital. Management believes that the Company’s capital resources should be adequate to continue operating and maintaining its business strategy during the fiscal year
   ending 30 September 2008. However, if the Company is unable to raise additional capital in the near  future, due to the Company’s liquidity problems, management expects that
   the Company will need to curtail operations, liquidate assets, seek additional capital on less favourable terms and/or pursue other remedial measures.
 
   These financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be
   necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.
 
   At 30 September 2007, the Company had suffered losses from development stage activities to date. Although management is currently attempting to implement its business
   plan, and is seeking additional sources of equity or debt financing, there is no assurance these activities will be successful. Accordingly, the Company must rely on its
   president to perform essential functions without compensation until a business operation can be  commenced. These factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of the
   Company to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
 
2.
Significant Accounting Policies
 
The following is a summary of significant accounting policies used in the preparation of these financial statements.
 
Basis of presentation
 
   The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to
   development stage enterprises, and are expressed in U.S. dollars. The Company’s fiscal year end is 30 September.
 
Cash and cash equivalents
 
Cash and cash equivalents include highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less.
 
 
 
16

 
Rose Explorations Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
September 30,  2007
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
Mineral property costs
 
The Company has been in the exploration stage since its formation on 5 December 2003 and has not yet realized any revenues from its planned operations. It is primarily engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mining properties. Mineral property acquisition and exploration costs are charged to operations as incurred. When it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven and probable reserves, the costs incurred to develop such property, are capitalized. Such costs will be amortized using the units-of-production method over the estimated life of the probable reserve.
 
   Although the Company has taken steps to verify title to mineral properties in which it has an interest, according to the usual industry standards for the stage of exploration of
   such properties, these procedures do not  guarantee the Company’s title. Such properties may be subject to prior agreements or transfers and title may be affected by
   undetected defects.
 
Reclamation costs
 
The Company’s policy for recording reclamation costs is to record a liability for the estimated costs to reclaim mined land by recording charges to production costs for each tonne of ore mined over the life of the mine. The amount charged is based on management’s estimation of reclamation costs to be incurred. The accrued liability is reduced as reclamation expenditures are made. Certain reclamation work is performed concurrently with mining and these expenditures are charged to operations at that time.
 
Long-lived assets
 
In accordance with SFAS No. 144, Accounting for Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, the carrying value of long-lived assets is reviewed on a regular basis for the existence of facts or circumstance that may suggest impairment. The Company recognized an impairment when the sum if the expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. Impairment losses, if any, are measured as the excess of the carrying amount of the asset over its estimated fair value.
 
Financial instruments
 
The carrying value of cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and due to related parties approximates their fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. The Company’s operations are in Canada and virtually all of its assets and liabilities are giving rise to significant exposure to market risks from changes in foreign currency rates. The Company’s financial risk is the risk that arises from fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and the degree of volatility of these rates. Currently, the Company does not use derivative instruments to reduce its exposure to foreign currency risk.
 
   Derivative financial instruments
 
   The Company has not, to the date of these financial statements, entered into derivative instruments to offset the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.
 
Income taxes
 
   Deferred income taxes are reported for timing differences between items of income or expense reported in the financial statements and those reported for income tax purposes in
   accordance with SFAS No. 109, Accounting for  Income Taxes, which requires the use of the asset/liability method of accounting for income taxes. Deferred income taxes and
   tax benefits are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and
   their respective tax bases, and for tax loss and credit carry-forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income
   in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The Company provides for deferred taxes for the estimated future tax effects
   attributable to temporary differences and carry-forwards when realization is more likely than not.
 
17


 
 
Rose Explorations Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
September 30,  2007
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

 
Basic and diluted net loss per share
 
The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share. SFAS No. 128 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all potentially dilutive shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.
 
Comprehensive loss
 
SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive loss and its components in the financial statements. As at 30 September 2007, the Company has no items that represent a comprehensive loss and, therefore, has not included a schedule of comprehensive loss in the financial statements.
 
Segments of an enterprise and related information
 
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information, supersedes SFAS No. 14, Financial Reporting for Segments of a Business Enterprise. SFAS 131 establishes standards for the way that public companies report information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires reporting of selected information about operating segments in interim financial statements issued to the public. It also establishes standards for disclosures regarding products and services, geographic areas and major customers. SFAS 131 defines operating segments as components of a company about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company has evaluated this SFAS and does not believe it is applicable at this time.
 
Start-up expenses
 
The Company has adopted Statement of Position No. 98-5, Reporting the Costs of Start-up Activities, which requires that costs associated with start-up activities be expensed as incurred.  Accordingly, start-up costs associated with the Company's formation have been included in the Company's general and administrative expenses for the period from the date of inception on 14 August 2003 to 30 September 2007.
 
Foreign currency translation
 
The Company’s functional and reporting currency is in U.S. dollar. The financial statements of the Company are translated to U.S. dollars in accordance with SFAS No. 52, Foreign Currency Translation. Monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated using the exchange rate prevailing at the balance sheet date. Gains and losses arising on translation or settlement of foreign currency denominated transactions or balances are included in the determination of income. The Company has not, to the date of these financial statements, entered into derivative instruments to offset the impact of foreign currency fluctuations.
 

18

 
 
Rose Explorations Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
September 30,  2007
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
 
 
    Use of estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenditures during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.
 
Recent accounting pronouncements
 
In May 2005, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued SFAS No. 154, Accounting Changes and Error Corrections - A Replacement of APB Opinion No. 20 and SFAS No. 3. SFAS No. 154 changes the requirements for the accounting for and reporting of a change in accounting principle and applies to all voluntary changes in accounting principle. It also applies to changes required by an accounting pronouncement in the unusual instance that the pronouncement does not include specific transition provisions. SFAS No. 154 requires retrospective application to prior periods' financial statements of changes in accounting principle, unless it is impracticable to determine either the period-specific effects or the cumulative effect of the change. The provisions of SFAS No. 154 are effective for accounting changes and correction of errors made in fiscal years beginning after 15 December 2005. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's results of operations or financial position.
 
In March 2005, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 107 to give guidance on the implementation of SFAS No. 123R. The Company will consider SAB No. 107 during implementation of SFAS No. 123R.
 
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 153, Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets - An Amendment of APB Opinion No. 29. The guidance in APB Opinion No. 29, Accounting for Nonmonetary Transactions, is based on the principle that exchanges of nonmonetary assets should be measured based on the fair value of the assets exchanged. The guidance in that Opinion, however, included certain exceptions to that principle. SFAS No. 153 amends Opinion No. 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The provisions of SFAS No. 153 are effective for nonmonetary asset exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after 15 June 2005. Early application is permitted and companies must apply the standard prospectively. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's results of operations or its financial position.
 
In December 2004, the FASB issued SFAS No. 123R, Share Based Payment. SFAS No. 123R is a revision of SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, and supersedes APB Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees and its related implementation guidance. SFAS No. 123R establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity's equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. SFAS No. 123R focuses primarily on accounting for transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. SFAS No. 123R requires a public entity to measure the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant-date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). That cost will be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award - the requisite service period (usually the vesting period). SFAS No. 123R requires that the compensation cost relating to share-based payment transactions be recognized in the financial statements.
 

 

19

 
 
Rose Explorations Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
September 30,  2007
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

   That cost will be measured based on the fair value of the equity or liability instruments issued. Public entities that file as small business issuers will be required to apply SFAS
   No. 123R in the first interim or annual reporting period that begins after 15 December 2005. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect on the
   Company's results of operations or its financial position.
 
   The FASB has also issued SFAS No. 151 and 152, but they will not have an effect of the financial reporting of the Company.
 
Mineral Properties
 
   On 21 February 2006 the Company acquired an interest in a mineral claim located in Clark County, Nevada (the “Rose Prospect Lode Mining Claim”) for $6,375. In May 2006 the
   Company commissioned a geological evaluation report of the Rose Prospect Lode Mining Claim and in June 2006 commissioned a Phase I work program as recommended by an
   evaluation report. During the Phase I work program the Company staked a second claim adjacent to the west of the Rose Lode Claim to cover other indicated mineralized zones
   observed in that area (the “Rose Prospect II Lode Mining Claim”).
 
   The Company incurred no exploration and development expenditures on the Rose Prospect Lode Mining Claim property for the year ended 30 September 2007 (2006 - $6,125,
   2005 - $Nil, cumulative - $6,125).
 
4.
Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities 
 
   Accounts payable and accrued liabilities are non-interest bearing, unsecured and have settlement dates within one year.
 
Related Party Transactions
 
During the year ended 30 September 2007, an officer and director of the Company made contributions to capital for management fees in the amount of $18,000 (2006 - $18,000, 2005 - $Nil, cumulative - $36,000) and rent in the amount of $6,000 (2006 - $6,000, 2005 - $Nil, cumulative - $12,000) (Note 8).
 
During the year ended 30 September 2007, the Company paid consulting fees of $2,500 (2006 - $Nil, 2005 - $Nil) to a company controlled by a director of the Company (Note 8).
 
6.            Capital Stock
 
   Authorized capital stock consists of 75,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per common share. The total issued and outstanding capital stock is 18,500,000
   common shares with a par value of $0.001 per  common share.
 

 
i.
On 3 December 2003, 1 common share of the Company was issued for cash proceeds of $1.

 
ii.
On 1 January 2006, 10,000,000 common shares were issued to an officer and director of the Company for cash proceeds of $10,000.

 
iii.
On 1 January 2006, 1 common share of the Company was redeemed for proceeds of $1. This common share was cancelled on the same date.

 
iv.
On 3 May 2007, the Company completed a public offering of securities pursuant to an exemption provided by Rule 504 of Regulation D, registered in the State of Nevada, and issued 8,500,000 common shares for total cash proceeds of $85,000.



20


 
Rose Explorations Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
September 30,  2007
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

7.         Income Taxes
 
The Company has losses carried forward for income tax purposes to 30 September 2007. There are no current or deferred tax expenses for the year ended 30 September 2007 due to the Company’s loss position. The Company has fully reserved for any benefits of these losses. The deferred tax consequences of temporary differences in reporting items for financial statement and income tax purposes are recognized, as appropriate. Realization of the future tax benefits related to the deferred tax assets is dependent on many factors, including the Company’s ability to generate taxable income within the net operating loss carryforward period. Management has considered these factors in reaching its conclusion as to the valuation allowance for financial reporting purposes.
 
The provision for refundable federal income tax consists of the following:
 

   
For the year ended September 2007
 
For the year ended September 2006
 
For the year ended September 2005
   
$
 
$
 
$
             
Deferred tax asset attributable to:
           
Current operations
 
21,953
 
13,920
 
102
Contributions to capital by related parties
 
(8,160)
 
(8,160)
 
-
Less: Change in valuation allowance
 
(13,793)
 
(5,760)
 
(102)
             
Net refundable amount
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
 
The composition of the Company’s deferred tax assets as at 30 September 2007, 2006 and 2005
are as follows:

   
As at 30 September 2007
 
As at 30 September 2006
 
As at 30 September 2005
   
$
 
$
 
$
             
Net income tax operating loss carryforward
 
105,507
 
40,940
 
300
             
Statutory federal income tax rate
 
34%
 
34%
 
34%
Contributed rent and services
 
-15.47%
 
-19.93%
 
0%
Effective income tax rate
 
0%
 
0%
 
0%
             
Deferred tax assets
 
19,552
 
5,760
 
102
Less: Valuation allowance
 
(19,552)
 
(5,760)
 
(102)
             
Net deferred tax asset
 
-
 
-
 
-
 
The potential income tax benefit of these losses has been offset by a full valuation allowance.


21

 
 
Rose Explorations Inc.
(A Development Stage Company)
Notes to Financial Statements
(Expressed in U.S. Dollars)
September 30,  2007
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

As at 30 September 2007, the Company has an unused net operating loss carry-forward balance of approximately $57,507 that is available to offset future taxable income. This unused net operating loss carry-forward balance expires between 2024 and 2027.
 
8.        Supplemental Disclosures with Respect to Cash Flows
 
   
2007
 
2006
 
2005
   
$
 
$
 
$
             
Cash paid during the year for interest
 
-
 
-
 
-
Cash paid during the year for income taxes
 
-
 
-
 
-

 
During the year ended 30 September 2007, an officer and director of the Company made contributions to capital for management fees in the amount of $18,000 (2006 - $18,000,
2005 - $Nil, cumulative - $36,000) and rent in the amount of $6,000 (2006 - $6,000, 2005 - $Nil, cumulative - $12,000) (Note 5).
 
During the year ended 30 September 2007, the Company paid consulting fees of $2,500 (2006 - $Nil, 2005 - $Nil) to a company controlled by a director of the Company (Note 5).


 
 
 

 
22


Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures
 
None.
 
Controls and Procedures 
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
Our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, have evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-KSB. Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that the information we are required to disclose in reports we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures, including cost limitations, the possibility of human error, judgments and assumptions regarding the likelihood of future events, and the circumvention or overriding of the controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.
 
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting
 
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 or 15d-15 promulgated under the Exchange Act that occurred during the last fiscal quarter of the fiscal year ended February 28, 2007 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. Management is aware that there is a lack of segregation of duties at our company due to the limited number of employees dealing with general administrative and financial matters. At this time management believes that, given the individuals involved and the control procedures in place, the risks associated with such lack of segregation are insignificant, and that the potential benefits of adding additional employees to segregate duties more clearly do not justify the associated added expense. Management will continue to evaluate this segregation of duties. In addition, management is aware that many of our currently existing internal controls are undocumented. Our management will be working to document such internal controls over the coming year.

 
Other Information.
 
None.
 
PART III
 
Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons; Compliance With Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act
 
Directors, Executive Officers and Key Employees
 
 
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our directors, executive officers and key employees as of September 30, 2007 and the date of the filing of this annual report:
 
 
                    Name
  
                           
Age
 
 
Position(s)
               Greg Cowan
  
40
  
                                               President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, Principal Accounting
                                               Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors
     
                Rex Pegg
  
54
  
                                               Vice President of Exploration and Director
 
 
 
23

 
Greg Cowan has been the President, Secretary, Treasurer and a Director of our Company since inception. Since 2005, Mr. Cowan has also been General Manager of Unicity International in Langley, British Columbia, Canada, where he is responsible for all aspects of operation including budgets, projections and overall profitability. Greg was also involved in the opening Unicity’s offices in China and Belgium in 2005. Prior to Joining Unicity, Mr. Cowan was Vice President of Sales and Marketing at Larrea BioScience Inc. in Vancouver, British Columbia, where he designed concepts for product labels, packaging, literature, handled trademark registration of items internationally, directed regulatory matters with Health Canada and US FDA, Australia, EU, Korea, hired and trained sales brokers and distributors across USA, Canada, Asia, EU and administered budgets. While with Larrea, he was involved in taking company public on NASDAQ and raising capital. He has also held the following positions: Director Sales and Marketing - Royal Numico; President and CEO - Natures Essence Inc.; and President and CEO Puresource Inc. Mr. Cowan is currently enrolled in the Ivey School of Business Executive MBA program and will graduate in the fall of 2008. Mr. Cowan is an enthusiastic team player with good leadership ability, is self motivated , is an analytical problem solver able to work independently and has excellent negotiation and sales skills. Mr. Cowan will devote his time as required to the business of our Company.

Rex S. Pegg, BASc., P.Eng. joined our Company in September 2006 as a Director and Vice President Exploration. Mr. Pegg graduated from the University of Toronto in 1976 with a Bachelor of Applied Science in Geological Engineering (exploration option). Prior to graduation, Mr. Pegg gained nine summers of mineral exploration experience in Canada. Subsequently he has continuously worked throughout Canada, as well as in Zimbabwe, China, Mexico, Kyrghyzstan, Philippines, the United States and Venezuela on mineral exploration and underground operations for Keewatin Engineering Inc., BP Resources Canada Ltd., Selco Inc., Kennco Explorations Limited, Lac Minerals Ltd. and various private and public junior mining companies. Mr. Pegg's experience encompasses exploration for epithermal/mesothermal/shear-related gold, volcanogenic massive sulphide, sedex, PGM, alkaline Cu-Au, placer diamond-gold and industrial mineral deposits. This work included the organization and management of projects ranging from small to large scale surface and underground programs and property evaluations, ore reserve estimations and due diligence. Mr. Pegg will devote his time as required to the business of our Company.

Term of Office of Directors
 
Our directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of our stockholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. Our officers are appointed by our Board of Directors and hold office until the officer dies or resigns or the Board elects a successor or removes the officer.
 
Key Employees
 
None.
 
Family Relationships
 
None.
 
Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings
 
None.  
 
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
 
Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file reports of beneficial ownership and changes in the beneficial ownership of our securities with the SEC of Forms 3 (Initial Statement of Beneficial Ownership), 4 (Statement of Changes of Beneficial Ownership of Securities) and 5 (Annual Statement of Beneficial Ownership of Securities). Directors, executive officers and beneficial owners of more than 10% of our Common Stock are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file. Based on a review of the SEC’s website, we believe that, with respect to our most recent fiscal year, all directors, executive officers and greater than 10% beneficial owners complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to them.
 
Code of Ethics
 
We have adopted an informal Code of Ethics that applies to our officers, directors and employees, which we feel is sufficient at this time, given we are still in the start-up, development stage and have limited employees, officers and directors.
 
 
24

 
 
Executive Compensation 
 
We currently have two executive officers, neither of which draws a salary. Greg Cowan serves as our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer and Rex Pegg serves as our Vice President of Exploration. The following summary compensation table sets forth information concerning compensation for services rendered in all capacities during 2007 awarded to, earned by or paid to our executive officers.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
                                         
Name and
 
Principal
 
Position
 
(a)
 
  
Year
(b)
 
  
Salary
($)
(c)
 
  
Bonus
($)
(d)
 
  
Stock
Awards
($)
(e)
 
  
Option
Awards
($)
(f)
 
  
Non-Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compensation
($)
(g)
 
  
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
($)
(h)
 
  
All Other
Compensation
($)
(i)
 
  
Total
($)
(j)
 
 
Greg Cowan, Chief Executive Officer and Principal Accounting Officer
 
  
 
2007
2006
  
$
$
0
0
  
0
0
 
  
0
0
  
0
0
  
0
0
  
 
0
0
  
0
0
  
$
$
0
0
 
Rex Pegg, V.P. Exploration
 
  
2007
2006
  
$
$
2,500
0
  
0
0
  
0
0
  
0
0
  
0
0
  
0
0
  
0
0
  
$
$
2,500
0


OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END TABLE

  
  
Option Awards
  
Stock Awards
Name
(a)
 
  
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
(Exercisable)
(b)
 
  
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
(Unexercisable)
(c)
 
  
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
(d)
 
  
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
(e)
 
  
Option
Expiration
Date
(f)
 
  
Number
of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
(#)
(g)
 
  
Market
Value of
Shares or
Units
of Stock
That Have
Not
Vested
($)
(h)
 
  
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number
of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
(#)
(i)
 
  
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market
or Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested
($)
(j)
 
 
GregCowan
 
  
0
  
0
  
0
  
0
  
N/A
  
0
  
$
0
  
0
  
0
 
Rex Pegg
 
  
0
  
0
  
0
  
0
  
N/A
  
0
  
 
0
  
0
  
0
 
 
Option Grants in 2007
 
No options were granted during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007. We have no outstanding warrants or stock options.
 
 
Director Compensation
 
On January 1, 2006, 10,000,000 shares of our common stock, valued at $0.01 per share, were issued to Greg Cowan, an officer and director of the Company in exchange for $10,000 in cash.
 
 
25

 
Employment Agreements
 
We have no employment or other agreements with any of our officers and directors.
 
Report on Repricing of Options
 
None.
 
 
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
 
The following table provides certain information regarding the ownership of our common stock, as of September 30, 2007, by:
 
 
 
each of our executive officers;
 
 
 
each director;
 
 
 
each person known to us to own more than 5% of our outstanding common stock; and
 
 
 
all of our executive officers and directors and as a group.
 
As of September 30, 2007 and the date of the filing of this annual report, we had a total of 18,500,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Greg Cowan, our principal Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, who holds approximately 9.6% of our shares, may be able to exert control over the Company and its management. Except as indicated in footnotes to this table, the persons named in this table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock indicated below.
 
       
Name of Beneficial Owner
 
  
Number of
Shares
Beneficially
Owned
 
  
Percent(%)
 
Greg Cowan
 
  
10,000,000
  
54%
________________________________________________________  
All directors and executive officers as a group (6 persons)
 
  
10,000,000
  
54%
 
Changes in Control
 
None.
 
 
Certain Relationships, Related Transactions and Director Independence 
 
During the year ended September 30, 2007, an officer and director made contributions to capital for management fees in the amount of $18,000 (2006 - $18,000) and for rent in the amount of $6,000 (2006 - $Nil).
 
Director Independence
 
The OTC Bulletin Board does not have a requirement that a majority of our Board of Directors be independent. However, with respect to the definition of independence utilized by NASDAQ, our officers and directors would be deemed to be independent.
 
 
26

The NASDAQ rules have both objective tests and a subjective test for determining who is an “independent director.” The objective tests state, for example, that a director is not considered independent if he or she is an employee of the Company or is a partner, executive officer or controlling stockholder of an entity to which the Company made, or from which the Company received, payments in the current or any of the past three fiscal years that exceed the greater of $200,000 or 5% of the recipient’s consolidated gross revenue for that year or a family member serves in the current fiscal year or has served at any time during the last three fiscal years as an executive officer of the Company. The subjective test states that an independent director must be a person who lacks a relationship that, in the opinion of the Board, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.
 
Exhibits 
 
The following exhibits marked with an asterisk are incorporated herein by reference to our original Form SB-2 registration statement and can be found in their entirety on the SEC website at www.sec.gov; all other exhibits are being filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-KSB:
 
Exhibit #
  
Description
   
  3.1*
  
Articles of Incorporation. (1)
   
  32*
 
23
  
By-Laws (2)
 
Consent of Auditors
     
31
 
Sec. 302 Certification
     
32
 
Sec. 906 Certification
   
 
Principal Accountant Fees and Services 
 
Audit Fees
 
The audit fees of James Stafford Chartered Accountants for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 were approximately $4,000 and $3,270, respectively.
 
Audit-Related Fees
 
The fees of James Stafford Chartered Accountants for providing audit-related services such as reviewing our quarterly reports on Form 10-QSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2007 was approximately $4,779.
 
Tax Fees
 
James Stafford Chartered Accountants does not provide us with tax compliance, tax advice or tax planning services.
 
All Other Fees
 
None.
 
 
27

SIGNATURES
 
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on our behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
ROSE EXPLORATIONS, INC.
 
/s/ Greg Cowan                                                                  
By: Greg Cowan, President and Chief Executive Officer
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
         
Signature
 
  
Title
 
  
Date
     
 
/s/ Greg Cowan
By: Greg Cowan
 
  
President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), Secretary, Treasurer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director
 
  
November 28, 2007
     
 
/s/ Rex S. Pegg
By: Rex S. Pegg
 
  
Vice President - Explorations and Director
 
  
November 28, 2007
     
 
28