UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Filed by the Registrant ☒
Filed by a Party other than the Registrant ☐
Check the appropriate box:
☐ |
Preliminary Proxy Statement | ☐ | Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) | |||
☒ |
Definitive Proxy Statement | |||||
☐ |
Definitive Additional Materials | |||||
☐ |
Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12 |
Horace Mann Educators Corporation
(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
☒ | No fee required. |
☐ | Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. |
(1) | Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: |
(2) | Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: |
(3) | Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): |
(4) | Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: |
(5) | Total fee paid: |
☐ | Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. |
☐ | Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. |
(1) | Amount Previously Paid: |
(2) | Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: |
(3) | Filing Party: |
(4) | Date Filed: |
2018 Horace Mann Educators Corporation Annual Meeting of Shareholders Meeting Notice & Proxy Statement AUTO HOME LIFE RETIREMENT
Dear Shareholder:
|
Springfield, Illinois
April 5, 2019 |
You are cordially invited to attend the Annual Meeting of Horace Mann Educators Corporation to be held at 9:00 a.m. Central Daylight Saving Time on Wednesday, May 22, 2019, at the Horace Mann Lincoln Auditorium, 1 Horace Mann Plaza, Springfield, Illinois 62715.
We will present a report on Horace Manns current affairs, and Shareholders will have an opportunity for questions and comments.
We encourage you to read the Proxy Statement and vote your shares as soon as possible. You may vote online, by telephone or by completing and returning a proxy card. Specific voting instructions are set forth in the Proxy Statement, the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and the proxy card. You may revoke your voted proxy at any time prior to the meeting or vote in person if you attend the meeting.
We look forward to seeing you. If you vote by proxy and do not plan to attend, let us know your thoughts about Horace Mann either by letter or by comment on the proxy card.
Sincerely,
H. Wade Reece | Marita Zuraitis | |
Chairman of the Board |
President & Chief Executive Officer |
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Meeting Notice
Horace Mann Educators Corporation
1 Horace Mann Plaza
Springfield, Illinois 62715-0001
When Wednesday, May 22, 2019 9:00 a.m. Central Daylight Saving Time
Where Horace Mann Lincoln Auditorium 1 Horace Mann Plaza Springfield, Illinois 62715
Why Elect 10 Directors named in the Proxy Statement. Approve the advisory resolution to approve Named Executive Officers compensation. Ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as the Companys auditors for the year ending December 31, 2019. Conduct other business, if properly raised.
Record Date March 26, 2019 - Shareholders registered in the records of the Company or its agents as of the close of business on that date are entitled to receive notice of and to vote at the meeting. |
The approximate availability date of the Proxy Statement and the proxy card is April 5, 2019. Your vote is important. Even if you do not plan to attend the Annual Meeting, the Board of Directors urges you to vote via the Internet, by telephone or by returning a proxy card. If you vote via the Internet or by telephone, do not return your proxy card. You may revoke your proxy at any time before the vote is taken at the Annual Meeting, provided that you comply with the procedures set forth in the Proxy Statement which accompanies this Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. If you attend the Annual Meeting, you may either vote by proxy or vote in person.
A broker is not permitted to vote on the election of directors or the advisory resolution to approve Named Executive Officers compensation without instructions from the beneficial owner. Therefore, if your shares are held in the name of your broker, bank or other nominee, unless you provide your broker, bank or other nominee with voting instructions, your shares will not be voted regarding these proposals.
We encourage you to read the Proxy Statement and vote your shares as soon as possible.
By order of the Board of Directors,
Donald M. Carley Corporate Secretary
Springfield, Illinois April 5, 2019 |
HORACE MANN EDUCATORS CORPORATION
2019 Proxy Statement Summary
This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. This summary does not contain all of the information you should consider. You should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.
Voting Matters and Board Vote Recommendation
|
| |||
Proposal |
Board vote | |||
Elect directors (page 4) |
FOR each director nominee | |||
Advisory Resolution to Approve Named Executive Officers Compensation (page 19) |
FOR | |||
Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (page 46) |
FOR |
Fiscal Year 2018 Business Highlights
We made important progress on strategic initiatives that will drive long-term improvement in our return on equity. This progress included a 2.6 point improvement in the underlying 2018 auto loss ratio and a 1.0 point improvement in the underlying 2018 property loss ratio.
The Companys 2018 financial results were significantly impacted by an unprecedented level of catastrophe costs and a challenging investment environment. Our unadjusted core earnings were $28.4 million. When the Compensation Committee adjusts for Property and Casualty catastrophes above plan, costs related to the recently announced acquisitions, Retirement and Life DAC unlocking and change in GMDB due to capital gains and losses, and market performance different from Plan, core earnings increased to $95.6 million. The committee makes these adjustments when calculating the Companys annual incentives as in any single year they can be highly volatile and outside the control of management. The committee does not make adjustments for these items in our long-term incentives, as over the long-term management should be held accountable for these outcomes and has more ability to manage through some of the one-time items over a longer period of time. Book value per share* decreased 1.3% in 2018 driven by the decline in operating results as well as a decrease in the unrealized gain from the investment portfolio resulting from wider credit spreads across most asset classes, with the 10-year U.S. Treasury rate rising 31 basis points to 2.71%. Total
Shareholder Return was -12.8% in 2018, outperforming life insurance indices and underperforming property and casualty insurance and general market indices.
*Excluding the fair value adjustment for investments
In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company announced plans to acquire NTA Life Enterprises, LLC (NTA) and Benefit Consultants Group, Inc. (BCG). These acquisitions bring exciting capabilities to expand our product set, enhance our distribution channels, and further improve our infrastructure, enhancing our long-term view.
While uncontrollable and one-time events impacted our core earnings, we do believe we had a strong overall year and positioned ourselves for future success. We made significant progress on numerous strategic initiatives, including:
| 6% growth in retirement sales deposits, with strong market response to fee-based product offerings |
| Double digit growth in Life sales (19.8%) |
| Continued solid earnings contributed from Life and Retirement |
| P&C earnings impacted by significant adverse weather/catastrophes |
- | Achieved 2.6 points of underlying auto loss ratio improvement |
- | Achieved 1 point of underlying property loss ratio improvement |
Please see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in HMECs 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more detailed description of these financial results.
Corporate and Compensation Governance Highlights
Director Term: One year
Director Election Standard: Majority vote
Board Meetings in 2018: 6
Board Committees (Meetings in 2018):
Audit (12), Compensation (6), Executive (2), Investment & Finance (4), Nominating & Governance (4), Customer Experience & Technology (4)
Corporate Governance Materials: investors.horacemann.com - Corporate Overview - Governance Documents
Board Communication: By mail to: Board of Directors, c/o Corporate Secretary, 1 Horace Mann Plaza, Springfield, Illinois 62715. By email to: hmecbofd@horacemann.com
Compensation Governance:
| Hedging transactions and pledging shares are prohibited for all Directors and Executive Officers |
| Clawback provisions are applicable to all Executive Officers for both cash and equity awards |
| Stock ownership requirements for all Directors and Executive Officers |
| Stock option holding requirement post-exercise |
ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS
Proxy Statement
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to Be Held on Wednesday, May 22, 2019. The Proxy Statement and Annual Report and Form 10-K (the Proxy Materials) are available at proxyvote.com.
|
2019 Proxy Statement General Information | 1 |
2 | 2019 Proxy Statement Your Proxy Vote |
2019 Proxy Statement Your Proxy Vote | 3 |
Proposals and Company Information
PROPOSAL NO. 1 - ELECTION OF 10 DIRECTORS
The Bylaws of the Company provide for the Company to have not less than five or more than 15 Directors. The following nine persons currently are serving as Directors of the Company (Directors): Daniel A. Domenech, Stephen J. Hasenmiller, Ronald J. Helow, Perry G. Hines, Beverley J. McClure, H. Wade Reece, Robert Stricker, Steven O. Swyers and Marita Zuraitis. The terms of these Directors expire at the Annual Meeting.
Board Qualifications
The Board of Directors believes it is necessary for each of the Directors to possess a variety of qualities and skills. The Nominating & Governance Committee conducts all necessary and appropriate inquiries into the background and qualifications of Board candidates, including the determination of their independence. In addition, the Nominating & Governance Committee has identified areas of expertise that it believes support the Companys business strategy in the short and long-term, enable the Board to exercise its oversight function and contribute to a well-rounded Board.
The list below highlights certain key qualifications and experience of our current Board.
✓ Education |
✓ Technology |
✓ Leadership | ||
✓ Niche Market |
✓ Financial Services |
✓ Financial Expert | ||
✓ Insurance Operations |
✓ Customer Experience |
✓ Investments | ||
✓ Agency Management |
✓ Insurance Brokerage |
✓ Brand & Marketing |
Board Diversity, Age and Tenure
The Nominating & Governance Committee believes that it is important that the Board be comprised of individuals with expertise in fields relevant to the Companys business, experience from different professions, a diversity of age, ethnicity and gender, and a range of tenures.
The Nominating & Governance Committee is responsible for reviewing with the Board, on an annual basis, the requisite skills and characteristics of new Board members as well as the composition of the Board as a whole. This assessment includes consideration of experience, perspective, background, skill sets, age, ethnicity, and gender makeup of the current Board as well as the candidates individual qualities in leadership, character judgment and ethical standards. It also assesses the effectiveness of our interest in diverse candidates.
4 | 2019 Proxy Statement Proposals and Company Information |
The Nominating & Governance Committee believes our Board Nominees (as identified below) represent a diverse base of perspectives and reflect the diversity of the Companys employees, customers and Shareholders, as well as an appropriate level of age and tenure, as further illustrated below.
Board Refreshment
The Board and Nominating & Governance Committee regularly consider the long-term makeup of the Board and how the members of the Board change over time. The Board and Nominating & Governance Committee understand the importance of Board refreshment and strive to balance the knowledge that comes from longer-term service on the Board with the new experience, ideas and energy that can come from adding directors to the Board. Directors who are 75 years of age or older may not stand for election in the absence of a specific finding by the Board that there are special circumstances to justify an exception, which supports Board refreshment. Mr. Helow has reached 75 years of age and is, therefore, not standing for election.
As Horace Mann continues to focus on profitable growth across all lines of business, the integration of Benefit Consultants Group, Inc. (BCG), which closed in January, and NTA Life Enterprises, LLC (NTA), which we anticipate will close in the middle of this year following required regulatory approvals, and the ongoing transformation of its technology and operations, we continue to consider Board refreshment opportunities. Indeed, in light of Ron Helows retirement from the Board and in order to ensure the Board has the background skills necessary to support Horace Manns continued growth, the Nominating & Governance Committee recommended, and the Board approved, the addition of two new Board members, Mark Konen and Mark Casady. Mr. Konen has extensive experience in the insurance industry, specifically in the life and annuity business. Most recently, Mr. Konen served as President of the Insurance and Retirement Solutions division of Lincoln Financial Group. Mr. Casady is a general partner with Vestigo Ventures, a FinTech venture capital fund. He has significant experience with technology and innovation. He served as the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of LPL Financial, one of the nations leading independent broker dealers.
2019 Proxy Statement Proposals and Company Information | 5 |
Board Nominees
Upon the recommendation of the Nominating & Governance Committee, the Board nominated Mr. Casady, Dr. Domenech, Mr. Hasenmiller, Mr. Hines, Mr. Konen, Ms. McClure, Mr. Reece, Mr. Stricker, Mr. Swyers and Ms. Zuraitis (the Board Nominees) to hold office as Directors. The proxies solicited by and on behalf of the Board will be voted FOR the election of the Board Nominees unless you specify otherwise. The Company has no reason to believe that any of the foregoing Board Nominees is not available to serve or will not serve if elected, although in the unexpected event that any such Board Nominee should become unavailable to serve as a Director, full discretion is reserved to the persons named as proxies to vote for such other persons as may be nominated, or the Board may reduce the size of the Board. Each Director will serve until the next Annual Meeting of Shareholders and until his or her respective successor is duly elected and qualified.
The following information, as of March 15, 2019, is provided with respect to each Board Nominee:
|
Mark S. Casady
Age: 58 Board Nominee
|
Mr. Casady was Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of LPL Financial Holdings, Inc. (LPL Financial), an independent broker dealer, until his retirement in 2017. He joined LPL Financial as Chief Operating Officer in 2002, became President in 2003 and Chairman and Chief Executive Officer at the end of 2005. Before joining LPL Financial, Mr. Casady was managing director of the mutual fund group for Deutsche Asset Management, Americas - formerly Scudder Investments, which he joined in 1994. In 2016, he co-founded Vestigo Ventures, a venture capital firm, which focuses on financing FinTech start-ups. He is General Partner and Chairman of the Advisory Board of Vestigo Ventures. Mr. Casady currently serves on the Board of Directors of Citizens Financial Group, Inc. He previously served on the Board of Directors of Eze Software Group and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) Board of Governors. Mr. Casady also served as the former Chairman of the Insured Retirement Institute.
Mr. Casadys in-depth knowledge of data management and technology, including cybersecurity, will bring a unique perspective and assist the Board with its oversight responsibilities.
|
6 | 2019 Proxy Statement Proposals and Company Information |
|
Daniel A. Domenech
Age: 73 Director Since: 2015
Horace Mann Committees: Customer Experience & Technology Nominating & Governance |
Dr. Domenech has served as the Executive Director of American Association of School Administrators, The School Superintendents Association, a professional organization for educational leaders, since July 2008. He is currently Chairman of the Board of the Communities in Schools of Virginia and is a member of the Board of Directors of Learning First Alliance, the Center for Naval Analyses, ACT and Universal Service Administrative Company where he Chairs the Schools and Libraries Committee. Dr. Domenech is also a past President of the New York State Council of School Superintendents, the Suffolk County Superintendents Association and the Suffolk County Organization for Promotion of Education, and was the first President and co-founder of the New York State Association for Bilingual Education. In addition, he has previously served on the U.S. Department of Educations National Assessment Governing Board, on the Advisory Board for the Department of Defense schools, on the Board of Directors for the Baldrige Award and on the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. Dr. Domenech has more than 40 years of experience in public education.
Dr. Domenechs experience in public education provides the Board with valuable insight into the Companys niche market and the challenges and opportunities within that market.
| ||
|
Stephen J. Hasenmiller
Age: 69 Director Since: 2004
Horace Mann Committees: Compensation (Chair) Audit Executive |
Mr. Hasenmiller retired in March 2001 after 24 years of service at The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc., an investment and insurance company, as Senior Vice President - Personal Lines. Mr. Hasenmillers prior affiliations include his tenure as Chairman of the Personal Lines Committee of the American Insurance Association (1999-2001) and membership on the Boards of Directors of the Institute for Business & Home Safety (1996-2001) and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (1995-2001).
Mr. Hasenmillers seasoned insurance background in the personal lines business, including both direct sales and agency distribution, as well as his understanding and experience in dealing with complex insurance issues, provides the Board with a valuable perspective.
|
2019 Proxy Statement Proposals and Company Information | 7 |
|
Perry G. Hines
Age: 56 Director Since: 2018
Horace Mann Committees: Customer Experience & Technology Investment & Finance |
Mr. Hines is a retired corporate marketing executive and is the principal and owner of The Hines Group, LLC, a firm he formed in 2006 specializing in marketing, communications and strategic planning. He has over 27 years of cross-sector experience in general management, brand, communications and marketing. Mr. Hines previously served as Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing and Communications Officer for Irwin Mortgage Corporation, a position he held from 2002 to 2007, Senior Vice President, Chief Marketing and Sales Officer of Lincoln Reinsurance Corporation from 1998 to 2002 and Vice President of Marketing & Communications of Safeco from 1995 to 1998. He has held numerous management roles and stewarded well-known household brands. In addition to his consulting practice, he currently serves as the Director of Advancement for Covenant Christian High School.
Mr. Hines cross-sector expertise in general management, brand building and strategic marketing brings unique perspective and insight to the Board.
| ||
|
Mark E. Konen
Age: 60 Board Nominee
|
Mr. Konen retired from Lincoln Financial Group, a financial services company, in February 2017 as President of the Insurance and Retirement Solutions division, a position he had held since 2008. He was responsible for all aspects of strategic leadership, product development, and client services as well as profitability management of the individual life insurance, group protection and retirement plan services businesses. He oversaw Lincoln Financial Groups individual life and annuity business as President, Individual Markets, from 2006 to 2008. Prior to its merger with Lincoln Financial Group in 2006, he served in various senior management positions with Jefferson Pilot Financial. Mr. Konen is currently a member of the Board of Directors of Lincoln Life & Annuity Company of New York.
Mr. Konens 35-year insurance career, extensive background and proven leadership in the life and retirement business will provide the Board with a valuable perspective.
|
8 | 2019 Proxy Statement Proposals and Company Information |
|
Beverley J. McClure
Age: 64 Director Since: 2013
Horace Mann Committees: Nominating & Governance (Chair) Audit Compensation Customer Experience & Technology |
Ms. McClure retired in 2007 after a 35-year career with United Services Automobile Association, a diversified financial services group, as Senior Vice President, Enterprise Operations. She is the owner of Fresh Perspectives LLC, a firm she founded in 2007 which specializes in executive coaching and small business consulting. Ms. McClure previously served as Senior Advisor of Endeavor Management, a consulting firm specializing in service culture creation, leadership coaching, business transformation, operational execution, and customer experience management, a position she held from 2010 to 2013. She holds the Chartered Life Underwriter and Fellow and Life Management Institute designations.
Ms. McClures broad experience in the areas of service excellence, customer experience, culture creation, employee engagement and quality management provides the Board with a valuable perspective.
| ||
|
H. Wade Reece
Age: 62 Director Since: 2016
Horace Mann Committees: Executive (Chair) Compensation Nominating & Governance |
Mr. H. Wade Reece retired in 2015 after a 37-year career with BB&T Corporation where he served as the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of BB&T Insurance Services, Inc. and BB&T Insurance Holdings, Inc., the sixth largest insurance broker globally. Until his retirement in 2015, Mr. Reece served as Vice Chairman of the Foundation of Agency Management Excellence Board of Directors and a member of the Executive Committee of The Institutes (American Institute for Chartered Property Casualty Underwriters and Insurance Institute of America). He was also a Chairman of the Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers and Chairman of the Board of Trustees of The Institutes. Mr. Reece currently is a member of the Board of Directors of the North Carolina State University Foundation and the Blue Ridge Conservancy.
Mr. Reeces in-depth knowledge of the insurance industry, leadership skills and broad experience with agency management provides the Board with industry insight and perspective.
|
2019 Proxy Statement Proposals and Company Information | 9 |
|
Robert Stricker
Age: 72 Director Since: 2009
Horace Mann Committees: Investment & Finance (Chair) Customer Experience & Technology |
Mr. Stricker retired from Shenkman Capital Management, Inc., an investment management firm, in March 2009 as Senior Vice President and Principal. Prior to joining Shenkman, he served as Managing Director, Head of U.S. Fixed Income, Citigroup Asset Management at Citigroup, Inc. from 1994 to 2001. Mr. Stricker has over 40 years of experience in the financial services industry. He currently serves as a Director of the CQS Directional Opportunities Feeder Fund Ltd. and on the OPEB Trust Board of the town of Greenwich, Connecticut. Mr. Stricker holds the Chartered Financial Analyst designation.
Mr. Strickers investment knowledge and financial services industry experience provide the Board with financial insights and assist the Board in its oversight responsibilities.
| ||
|
Steven O. Swyers
Age: 68 Director Since: 2014
Horace Mann Committees: Audit (Chair) Executive Investment & Finance |
Mr. Swyers retired in 2013 after a 40-year career with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC), a public accounting firm. During this time with PwC, he served as the lead engagement partner on many national and international companies, including those in the financial services industry. He has also held various leadership positions at PwC, including leader of the Central Regions consumer and industrial products business segment and managing partner of its St. Louis practice. He is currently a member of the Board of Directors of Mercy Health East Communities. Mr. Swyers holds the Certified Public Accountant designation.
Mr. Swyers has an extensive audit and accounting background and is recognized as a financial expert. His knowledge in these areas assists the Board in its oversight responsibilities.
|
10 | 2019 Proxy Statement Proposals and Company Information |
|
Marita Zuraitis
Age: 58 Director Since: 2013
Horace Mann Committees: Customer Experience & Technology Executive Investment & Finance |
Ms. Zuraitis was appointed to her present position as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company in September 2013 after joining the Company in May 2013 as President and Chief Executive Officer-Elect. Ms. Zuraitis came to Horace Mann from The Hanover Insurance Group where she was an Executive Vice President and a member of The Hanovers Executive Leadership Team. From 2004 to 2013, she served as President, Property and Casualty Companies, of The Hanover Insurance Group. Prior to 2004, Ms. Zuraitis was with The St. Paul/Travelers Companies for six years, where she achieved the position of President and Chief Executive Officer, Commercial Lines. She also held a number of increasingly responsible underwriting and field management positions with United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company and Aetna Life and Casualty. She is a member of the Board of Trustees of The Institutes, the leading provider of risk management and property-casualty insurance education, whose offerings include the premier CPCU® designation, and a past member of the Board of Directors of LL Global, Inc., a trade association with operating divisions LIMRA and LOMA. She is also a member of the Board of Directors of Citizens Financial Group, Inc. Ms. Zuraitis has over 30 years of experience in the insurance industry.
Ms. Zuraitiss knowledge of and extensive background in the insurance industry contribute to Board discussion and understanding of issues impacting the Company.
|
All of the Board Nominees were elected Directors at the last Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company held on May 23, 2018, with the exception of Mr. Casady and Mr. Konen, who were recommended for nomination as Directors by the Companys Nominating and Governance Committee.
The Board recommends that Shareholders vote FOR the election of these 10 nominees as Directors.
2019 Proxy Statement Proposals and Company Information | 11 |
12 | 2019 Proxy Statement Proposals and Company Information |
2019 Proxy Statement Proposals and Company Information | 13 |
The following table identifies membership and the Chairman of each of the current committees of the Board, as well as the number of times each committee met during 2018.
Director | Executive Committee |
Compensation Committee |
Nominating & Governance |
Investment & Finance |
Audit Committee |
Customer Technology | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Daniel A. Domenech |
X | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stephen J. Hasenmiller |
X | Chair | X | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Perry G. Hines |
X | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beverley J. McClure | X | Chair | X | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
H. Wade Reece |
Chair | X | X | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Robert Stricker | Chair | X | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Steven O. Swyers |
X | X | Chair | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marita Zuraitis | X | X | X | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Meetings in 2018 | 2 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 12 | 4 |
Chair - Committee Chair
X - Committee member
(1) | The Customer Experience & Technology Committee is an ad hoc committee. |
14 | 2019 Proxy Statement Proposals and Company Information |
The Compensation Committee (the Committee) reviews compensation to be paid to the Companys non-employee Directors. The Committee retained Compensation Advisory Partners LLC (CAP) as independent compensation consultants to provide information and advice to the Committee regarding non-employee Director compensation. CAP analyzes each element of director compensation for the same peer group of companies that is used to evaluate executive compensation. See Compensation levels should be market competitive in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis for a list of these peer companies. CAP also considers non-employee Director compensation in the insurance industry and the broader general industry, as appropriate. The Committee reviews CAPs report of competitive Director compensation and determines whether to recommend to the Board a change in the Companys non-employee Director compensation. If such a change is recommended by the Committee, the full Board would then determine whether to ratify the change. The Compensation Committees current practice is to review non-employee Director compensation every other year. In 2018, the Compensation Committee did not recommended any changes to non-employee Director compensation.
The compensation program for non-employee Directors is shown in the following table:
Compensation Element
|
Non-Employee Director Compensation (1)(2)
| |
Board Chairman Annual Retainer |
$115,000 | |
Board Member
Annual Retainer |
$60,000 | |
Committee Chairman Annual Retainer |
$25,000 Audit Committee $15,000 Compensation Committee $15,000 Customer Experience & Technology Committee $15,000 Investment & Finance Committee $12,000 Nominating & Governance Committee | |
Committee Member
Annual Retainer |
$10,000 Audit Committee $ 7,500 all other Committees (3) | |
Share-based Compensation |
Fair value on the date of the respective awards is used to determine the number of Restricted Stock Units (RSUs) awarded. An annual award of $95,000 in RSUs following the Annual Shareholder Meeting. $95,000 in RSUs if joining the Board within six months after the prior Annual Shareholder Meeting, $47,500 in RSUs if joining more than six months after the prior Annual Shareholder Meeting but before the next Annual Shareholder Meeting. All awards have a 1-year vesting period. | |
Basic Group Term Life Insurance |
Premium for $10,000 face amount | |
Business Travel Accident Insurance |
Premium for $100,000 coverage |
(1) | Annual retainer fees are paid following the Annual Shareholder Meeting each year. The annual retainer fees are prorated to the extent that a non-employee Director joins the Board after the Annual Shareholder Meeting. |
(2) | Non-employee Directors may elect to defer cash compensation into RSUs. |
(3) | All other Committees except for the Executive Committee, which is not paid an Annual Retainer. |
2019 Proxy Statement Proposals and Company Information | 15 |
The following table sets forth information regarding compensation earned by, or paid to, the non-employee Directors during 2018:
Director |
Fees Earned in Cash ($) |
Stock Awards ($) (1) |
All Other Compensation ($) (2) |
Total ($) |
||||||||||||
Daniel A. Domenech |
75,000 | 95,000 | 204 | 170,204 | ||||||||||||
Stephen J. Hasenmiller |
85,000 | 95,000 | 204 | 180,204 | ||||||||||||
Ronald J. Helow |
82,500 | 95,000 | 204 | 177,704 | ||||||||||||
Perry G. Hines |
75,000 | 95,000 | 51 | 170,051 | ||||||||||||
Beverley J. McClure |
97,000 | 95,000 | 51 | 192,051 | ||||||||||||
H. Wade Reece |
130,000 | 95,000 | 51 | 225,051 | ||||||||||||
Robert Stricker |
82,500 | 95,000 | 204 | 177,704 | ||||||||||||
Steven O. Swyers |
92,500 | 95,000 | 204 | 187,704 |
(1) | Represents fees deferred in 2018 pursuant to the HMEC 2010 Comprehensive Executive Compensation Plan, as well as $95,000 in RSUs (awarded May 23, 2018). As of December 31, 2018, each Director had 2,169 unvested RSUs. |
(2) | Represents insurance premiums provided by the Company for group term life insurance and business travel accident insurance for each Director. The group term life insurance premiums are age-banded and this is reflected in the lower premiums for Mr. Hines, Ms. McClure and Mr. Reece. |
16 | 2019 Proxy Statement Proposals and Company Information |
2019 Proxy Statement Proposals and Company Information | 17 |
18 | 2019 Proxy Statement Proposals and Company Information |
2019 Proxy Statement Proposals and Company Information | 19 |
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
In this section, we describe the material components of our executive compensation program for our Named Executive Officers (NEOs), whose compensation is displayed in the 2018 Summary Compensation Table and the other compensation tables contained in this Proxy Statement. We also provide an overview of our executive compensation philosophy and we explain how and why the Compensation Committee of our Board (the Committee) arrives at specific compensation policies and decisions.
Our 2018 NEOs are our Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and the three other most highly compensated Executive Officers employed at the end of 2018:
Marita Zuraitis, President and CEO; Bret A. Conklin, Executive Vice President and CFO; Matthew P. Sharpe, Executive Vice President, Strategy and Business Development; William J. Caldwell, Executive Vice President, Property & Casualty and Customer Engagement; and Bret L. Benham, Executive Vice President, Life & Retirement
|
Executive Summary
This summary highlights information from this Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and may not contain all the information that is necessary to gain a full understanding of our policies and decisions. Please read the entire Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and compensation tables for a more complete understanding of our compensation program.
Our Business
We are a personal insurance and financial services business with approximately $11.0 billion of assets and approximately $1.2 billion in total revenue as of December 31, 2018. Founded by Educators for Educators®, we offer our products and services primarily to K-12 teachers, administrators, and other public school employees and their families. We underwrite personal lines of auto, property and life insurance, as well as retirement products in the United States.
2018 Business Highlights
We made important progress on strategic initiatives that will drive long-term improvement in our return on equity. This progress included a 2.6 point improvement in the underlying 2018 auto loss ratio and a 1.0 point improvement in the underlying 2018 property loss ratio.
The Companys 2018 financial results were significantly impacted by an unprecedented level of catastrophe costs and a challenging investment environment. Our unadjusted core earnings were $28.4 million. When we adjust for Property and Casualty catastrophes greater than plan, costs related to the recently announced acquisitions, Retirement and Life deferred acquisition costs (DAC) unlocking and change in guaranteed minimum death benefit (GMDB) due to capital gains and losses and market performance different from Plan, core earnings increased to $95.6 million. We make these adjustments when calculating our annual incentive as in any single year they can be highly volatile and outside the control of management. We do not make adjustments for these items in our long-term incentives, as over the long-term management should be held accountable for these outcomes and has more ability to manage through some of the one-time items over a longer period of time. Book value per share* decreased 1.3% in 2018 driven by a decline in the unrealized gain from the
20 | 2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
investment portfolio resulting from wider credit spreads across most asset classes, with the 10-year U.S. Treasury rate rising 31 basis points to 2.71%. Total Shareholder Return was -12.8% in 2018, outperforming life insurance indices and underperforming property and casualty insurance and general market indices.
*Excluding the fair value adjustment for investments
In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company announced plans to acquire NTA Life Enterprises, LLC (NTA) and Benefit Consultants Group, Inc. (BCG). These acquisitions bring exciting capabilities to expand our product set, enhance our distribution channels, and further improve our infrastructure, enhancing our long-term view.
While uncontrollable and one-time events impacted our core earnings, we do believe we had a strong overall year and are well positioned for future success. We made significant progress on numerous strategic initiatives, including:
| 6% growth in retirement sales deposits, with strong market response to fee-based product offerings |
| Double digit growth in Life sales (19.8%) |
| Continued solid earnings contributed from Life and Retirement |
| P&C earnings impacted by significant adverse weather/catastrophes |
- Achieved 2.6 points of underlying auto loss ratio improvement
- Achieved 1 point of underlying property loss ratio improvement
Please see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in HMECs 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a more detailed description of these financial results.
2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 21 |
2018 Executive Compensation Highlights
These elements of the executive compensation program are described more fully below.
Pay mix comprised of base salary, cash annual incentives under the Annual Incentive Plan (AIP), and equity-based long-term incentives under the Long-term Incentive Plan (LTIP) Over 70% of the CEOs target compensation and over 60% of all other NEOs target compensation linked to performance-based or service-vested incentives Balanced performance measures designed with a focus on Shareholder return, both absolute and relative, and incenting operating growth while managing risk Performance incentives tied to multiple overlapping performance periods Annual cash incentives tied to Company and business line performance measures Long-term incentives entirely equity based: ➣ Performance-based RSUs vest following a 3-year period, based on relative measures (relative total shareholder return and relative operating return on equity) and an absolute total written premium growth measure ➣ Service-vested stock options with a 4-year vesting period ➣ Service-vested RSUs with a 3-year vesting period Stock ownership guidelines for NEOs ➣ Twelve-month post-exercise holding requirement for stock options ➣ Minimum 12-month vesting for all equity awards Clawback policy applicable to both cash and equity awards Executive change in control plan excludes tax gross-up provision Limited perks and executive benefits
|
Pay Governance
Oversight
The Committee oversees our executive compensation program. The current members of the Committee are Mr. Hasenmiller, Ms. McClure, and Mr. Reece. Mr. Hasenmiller serves as the Committee Chair. Consistent with the listing standards of the NYSE, the Committee is composed entirely of independent Directors.
The Committee retained Compensation Advisory Partners LLC (CAP) as independent compensation consultants. CAP provides information and advice on the competitive market for executive talent, evolving market practices in our industry and the general employment market, regulatory and other external developments, and our executive compensation philosophy and incentive program design. In this way, CAP assists the Committee with ongoing education. Also, Committee members comply with Directors education requirements to help ensure each remains up to date on current issues relevant to the Company and its business.
The CAP consultants report directly to the Committee, attend the Committee meetings and portions of executive sessions of the Committee at the Chairs request (generally with the Boards outside legal counsel, but without management present). CAP serves at the pleasure of the Committee, and performs no services for management. CAP works with management to obtain necessary data and perspectives on the Companys strategic objectives, business environment, corporate culture, performance, and other relevant factors. This information is used by CAP to formulate its recommendations related to competitive compensation performance targets and overall design. CAPs findings and recommendations are reported directly to the Committee. The services provided by CAP during 2018 are described in more detail throughout this analysis. Pursuant to regulatory requirements,
22 | 2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
the Committee assessed CAPs independence (along with that of its other direct and indirect consultants and advisors) in 2018 and concluded that CAPs work did not raise any conflict of interest. In addition, the Committee has the authority to hire other experts and advisors as it deems necessary.
Management also supports the Committee by providing analysis and recommendations. When setting levels of executive compensation, the Committee requests, receives, and considers the recommendations of the CEO regarding the performance of her direct reports and other Executive Officers. Members of management also attend and contribute to Committee meetings as relevant to the Committee agenda.
The Committee discusses its fundamental views on compensation and guiding principles, as well as its expectations of the CEOs performance and annual goals, with the CEO and subsequently proposes the CEOs goals to the Board for approval. The Committee does not include the CEO or other members of management in its discussions with CAP on the CEOs compensation, nor does the CEO or management participate in the Committees recommendation to the Board on the CEOs compensation.
Say on Pay
At the 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, 98.2% of Shareholders voted, on an advisory basis, to ratify the NEO compensation. This Say on Pay vote reflected a significant increase over the 70.3% Shareholder vote from the 2017 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
In response to the 2017 Say on Pay advisory vote and at the direction of the Committee, Company management solicited, and received, feedback from certain proxy advisory firms and our Shareholders regarding the 2017 NEO compensation. Based on the feedback received, we made several changes to our executive compensation disclosure, including disclosing the peer group we use when making executive compensation decisions, and disclosing the threshold, target, and maximum performance levels for our AIP and LTIP programs.
The Committee welcomes the opportunity to provide additional insight into our executive compensation practices and appreciates the positive support from our Shareholders. We continue to believe that the overall structure of our compensation plans, the absence of excessive perquisites, and our demonstrated pay-for-performance practices reflect the strength of the Companys executive compensation programs.
Executive Compensation Program
Guiding Principles
The Committee has established a set of core principles that underlie our executive compensation program. These core principles provide guidance to the Committee and management in making decisions while administering the program or when considering changes. These core principles include strong alignment between pay and performance, incentive to drive Shareholder value, and market competitiveness.
Strong pay for performance alignment
We target compensation around the median of the competitive market, with executives earning more or less than median, generally based on the performance of the Company and value delivered to Shareholders. Our core executive compensation program includes base salary, an annual cash incentive plan (AIP), and long-term equity awards (LTIP). Both AIP and LTIP are administered under the Shareholder-approved 2010 Comprehensive Executive Compensation Plan, as amended (CECP). Incentive awards are earned upon the achievement of short-term and long-term business goals that are reviewed and approved by the Committee at the beginning of each performance period. Performance goals are structured to reward business growth, profitability, relative total shareholder return, balanced with productivity and risk and capital management.
2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 23 |
Incentive compensation should drive long-term value creation and reward strong performance
The AIP performance goals are based on premiums and adjusted operating income which drive long-term value and are metrics management can control. The LTIP performance goals are directly linked to multi-year growth and return measures to keep executives focused on value creation, with multiple metrics based on performance versus peers to focus on outperforming our peers.
Significant portion of compensation should be at risk based on the Companys performance and aligned with Shareholders interests
For 2018, over 70% of the CEOs target total pay (base salary, target annual incentive, and target long-term incentive) and over 60% of target total pay for all other NEOs is at risk, and is variable from year to year, and for the majority of it, the level of payout is dependent on the Companys performance. To encourage executive performance on a long-term basis, and to align executive interests with Shareholders, the Committee grants equity awards with multi-year performance periods and multi-year vesting. In 2018, Ms. Zuraitis received approximately 49% of her target compensation in equity. With respect to the other NEOs, approximately 32% to 45% of their compensation was equity-based.
Compensation levels should be market competitive
The Committee sets total direct compensation for the NEOs salary and target annual and long-term incentive opportunities within a reasonable range of the median of the competitive market, while providing the ability to decrease or increase compensation if warranted by performance and experience. To determine competitive pay levels, we use an established peer group of similarly sized insurance companies in the Russell 3000® Index. The Committee worked with CAP to select our peer insurance companies for 2018 (charted below), based upon assets under management and revenue. The peer group does not include reinsurance or insurance brokers. We supplement this information with survey market data from published sources including Equilar, Towers Watson, and Korn Ferry. The data from these surveys is scaled to our size by CAP based on revenues or asset ranges. Annually, CAP provides the Committee with a comparison of the base salary, annual incentives and long-term incentives of the CEO with those of other Chief Executive Officers based on the peer group and survey data obtained.
The Committee does not seek to benchmark or set executive compensation at any specific level relative to the peer group. Instead, the Committee uses this information primarily as a general reference point for seeking to determine pay levels and forms of plan design that effectively recognize favorable executive performance and experience, and ensure executive retention. For 2018, CAPs analysis demonstrated that overall core total direct compensation for Ms. Zuraitis was consistent with target pay positioning at the median of the market. The other NEOs are assessed against comparable functional matches in the insurance industry and the broader general industry, as appropriate. Based on the data received, and CAPs analysis, the Committee deliberates in executive session to determine its recommendation for approval by the Board.
2018 Peer Group
| ||||
Ambac Financial Group, Inc.
|
Kemper Corporation
|
Primerica, Inc.
| ||
American Equity Investment Life Holding Co
|
MBIA, Inc.
|
RLI Corporation
| ||
Argo Group International Holdings, Ltd.
|
National General Holdings Corporation
|
Selective Insurance Group, Inc.
| ||
CNO Financial Group, Inc.
|
National Western Life Group, Inc.
|
State Auto Financial Corporation
| ||
Employers Holdings, Inc.
|
Navigators Group, Inc.
|
United Fire Group, Inc.
| ||
FBL Financial Group, Inc.
|
24 | 2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Compensation Mix
Our NEOs annual compensation consists of base salary, annual and long-term incentives. The targeted compensation mix of total direct compensation for the NEOs for 2018 is illustrated below. The mix of 2018 actual compensation varied as a result of actual incentives earned.
Base Salary
Competitive base salaries are critical to attracting and retaining high performing executive talent. The Committee seeks to pay salaries that approximate median for executives of similar companies in like positions. However, in recruiting new executives, we vary from these guidelines to attract desired talent. Additionally, an existing executives compensation may deviate from median due to experience, performance, responsibilities, compensation history, internal equity, or retention risk.
Salaries for the NEOs and other executive officers are reviewed every 12 months in connection with the review of financial results for the prior fiscal year and the annual performance review discussed under Annual Performance and Pay Review below. In 2018, Ms. Zuraitis, Mr. Conklin, Mr. Sharpe, and Mr. Caldwell received base salary increases to move overall compensation closer to the market median. Mr. Benham was hired in late-November 2017 and did not receive a base salary increase in 2018. Base salary adjustments for 2018 are shown in the chart below.
Named Individual | 2017 Annualized Salary |
2018 |
Percent Increase |
|||||||
Marita Zuraitis
|
|
$850,000
|
|
|
$900,000
|
|
5.9%
| |||
Bret A. Conklin
|
|
$320,000
|
|
|
$350,000
|
|
9.4%
| |||
Matthew P. Sharpe
|
|
$415,000
|
|
|
$425,000
|
|
2.4%
| |||
William J. Caldwell
|
|
$375,000
|
|
|
$385,000
|
|
2.7%
| |||
Bret L. Benham
|
|
$350,000
|
|
|
$350,000
|
|
0.0%
|
Annual Incentive Plan
Our AIP is a cash incentive plan, administered under the CECP, and designed to drive and reward strong performance over a one-year period. Annually, the Committee establishes the performance
2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 25 |
objectives, threshold, target and maximum performance levels, and the related threshold, target and maximum AIP opportunities for each NEO, expressed as a percentage of base salary. Target incentive opportunity levels for the NEOs are intended to approximate the median of the target bonus potential for similarly situated executives in comparable companies. Maximum incentive opportunities are set at 200% of target.
For 2018, there were four performance measures, with 50% of the award based on Company-wide adjusted core earnings, and the remaining 50% divided among specific sales and premiums metrics of the different business lines: P&C net written premium (20%), retirement sales (20%), and life sales (10%), as shown in the chart below. This provides a balance between shareholder return and growth, while complementing the longer-term LTIP metrics, which focus on long-term shareholder value creation.
2018 Annual Incentive Plan Performance Measures
Adjusted Core Earnings - Operating income (GAAP net income before tax, excluding realized investment gains and losses other than those for Fixed Indexed Annuity related options and embedded derivatives) adjusted for P&C catastrophe costs different than the annual Plan, Annuity & Life DAC unlocking and GMDB reserve due to capital gains and losses and market performance different than Plan, the impact on investment income of share repurchases different than Plan, and debt structure/costs including debt retirement different than Plan
P&C Net Premium Written (GAAP) - Amount charged for property and casualty policies issued during the year (portions of such amounts may be earned and included in financial reports over future periods)
Retirement Sales - The amount of new business from the sales of Horace Mann retirement products, from Horace Mann and independent agents, as measured by premiums and deposits to be collected over the 12 months following the sale
Life Sales - The amount of new Horace Mann individual life insurance products sold during the year, as measured by premiums and deposits to be collected over the 12 months following the sale |
All the NEOs 2018 annual incentive amounts are based on the same corporate and business line objectives to promote cooperation. The targets for the operating income and sales or premium measures were based on a review of market conditions and expectations of other companies in the industry as well as our financial plan for 2018 (2018 Plan). The 2018 Plan was the basis of our 2018 earnings guidance, which was publicly disclosed in February 2018 in connection with the announcement of results for the year ended December 31, 2017. The Committee believes that tying the AIP to overall Company performance provides appropriate alignment for an executives compensation as it recognizes that the Company as a whole must perform well in order to deliver value
26 | 2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
to our Shareholders. Further, tying all the NEOs AIP awards to the performance of all business lines incentivizes cooperation among the business line leaders. It is the goal of the Committee to establish measurements and targets that are reasonable, but not easily achieved. The measures and targets are discussed with the CEO, other NEOs, other members of the Board and CAP before they are set.
Each March, the Committee certifies performance and determines AIP payouts for the prior year. Based on the 2018 results of 108.4% of target for Ms. Zuraitis and the other NEOs, the 2018 AIP payouts (paid in March 2019) were as follows:
2018 AIP Measures (in $M) |
Threshold | Target | Maximum | Actual | Results | Weighting | Payout | |||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted Core Earnings
|
|
85.3
|
|
|
91.7
|
|
|
101.4
|
|
|
95.6
|
|
|
140.2%
|
|
|
50%
|
|
|
70.1%
|
| |||||||
P&C Net Premium Written
|
|
689.3
|
|
|
699.8
|
|
|
713.8
|
|
|
688.3
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
0.0%
|
| |||||||
Retirement Sales |
|
524.5
|
|
|
535.2
|
|
|
556.6
|
|
|
533.4
|
|
|
91.7%
|
|
|
20%
|
|
|
18.3%
|
| |||||||
Horace Mann Life Sales
|
|
19.3
|
|
|
19.5
|
|
|
19.8
|
|
|
21.1
|
|
|
200.0%
|
|
|
10%
|
|
|
20.0%
|
| |||||||
Total
|
|
100%
|
|
|
108.4%
|
|
Named Individual |
2018 Target |
2018 Actual AIP Payout |
2018 Actual AIP
Payout as a % of Base Salary | |||
Marita Zuraitis
|
100%
|
$966,746
|
107.4%
| |||
Bret A. Conklin
|
60%
|
$224,430
|
64.1%
| |||
Matthew P. Sharpe
|
60%
|
$375,3871
|
88.3%
| |||
William J. Caldwell
|
60%
|
$249,366
|
64.8%
| |||
Bret L. Benham
|
50%
|
$189,735
|
54.2%
|
(1) Includes additional $100,000 related to NTA acquisition
2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 27 |
Long-term Incentive Plan
The intent of our LTIP is to focus executives on Shareholder value and key strategic objectives, while promoting retention.
2018 LTIP Aggregate Target Opportunity
In setting the dollar values of the 2018 opportunities under LTIP for each NEO, the Committee targeted amounts that would achieve the Companys overall objective of positioning total compensation at approximately the market median. The 2018 target grant values for the NEOs were as follows:
Named Individual
|
2018 LTIP
|
|||
Marita Zuraitis
|
|
$1,700,000
|
| |
Bret A. Conklin
|
|
$325,000
|
| |
Matthew P. Sharpe
|
|
$550,000
|
| |
William J. Caldwell
|
|
$400,000
|
| |
Bret L. Benham
|
|
$250,000
|
|
2018 LTIP Award Vehicles
For 2018, the LTIP is comprised of three vehicles, as illustrated in the chart below: (1) performance-based RSUs; (2) service-vested RSUs; and (3) service-vested stock options.
Performance-based RSUs - Earned over a three-year period, based upon Relative (80%) and Absolute Measures (20%). If any shares are earned at the end of the three-year performance period, the executive fully vests in the award | ||
Service-vested RSUs - Vest ratably over three years | ||
Stock options - Granted at fair market value with a 10 year life; options vest ratably over four years |
Performance-Based RSUs (PBRSUs)
The Committee believes that PBRSUs provide an effective vehicle for rewarding executives based on a three-year performance period. Each year, a new three-year period starts, partially overlapping the periods that started the prior two years. PBRSUs were granted on March 6, 2018 for the 2018-2020 performance period and comprise 50% of the 2018 LTIP opportunity. These RSUs will be earned and vested on December 31, 2020, if at all, based on the level of achievement. From the date of grant, PBRSUs accrue dividend equivalents at the same rate as dividends paid to our Shareholders, but the dividend equivalents are only paid on the corresponding shares that are earned. If no shares are earned, the dividend equivalents are forfeited. Earned dividend equivalents are converted into additional RSUs.
Service-vested RSUs
The Committee believes that service-vested RSUs assist in the retention of key executive talent. Service-vested RSUs were granted on March 6, 2018 and comprise 20% of the 2018 LTIP opportunity. Service-vested RSUs vest 33% after the first year, vest an additional 33% after the second year and vest the final 34% after the third year from the grant date, and are subject to continued employment through the vesting date. From the date of the grant, the RSUs accrue dividend equivalents at the same rate as dividends paid to our Shareholders. These dividend equivalents are converted into additional RSUs and vest when the underlying RSUs vest.
28 | 2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Stock Options
The Committee believes that non-qualified stock options (NQSO) provide strong alignment with Shareholder interests, as participants do not realize any value unless our stock price appreciates. They also promote retention. Stock options granted under the LTIP have an exercise price equal to the closing price of our Common Stock on the date of grant, vest ratably over a four-year period subject to continued employment on each vesting date and have a ten-year term. Stock options were granted on March 6, 2018 and comprise 30% of the 2018 LTIP opportunity. The number of options granted was determined using the Black-Scholes valuation method. For additional information regarding assumptions used for these valuations, see the Companys 2018 Annual Report on Form 10-K Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Note 1 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Share-Based Compensation. Upon exercise, Executive Officers are required to hold shares equivalent to any proceeds (net of exercise price and related taxes and the costs of the exercise) for a minimum of twelve months.
Timing of Equity Grants
The Committee has granted long-term incentives only at its regularly scheduled Board meetings. The grant date is the applicable resolution as approved or a future date as otherwise specified in the resolution.
2018-2020 Performance-based RSUs
The Performance-based RSUs granted in 2018 have three performance measures as shown below:
Relative Total Shareholder Return - Relative Total Shareholder Return for the three-year period measured against a peer group of companies.
Relative Operating Return on Equity - Average annual relative Operating Income return on average equity for the three-year period measured against a peer group of companies.
Total Revenue Growth - Measured as the CAGR over the period 12/31/2017 to 12/31/2020 for Written Premium Growth for HMN auto, property, and life and total retirement sales for annuity (HMN, RIA and institutional platform) and Horace Mann General Agency (HMGA). |
Prior Years PBRSU Grants
2017-2019 PBRSUs
The PBRSUs granted in 2017 will not mature until December 31, 2019. Since the applicable three-year performance period has not yet ended, actual performance against targets is not yet known. Additional information on these targets and actual performance will be provided at the end of the performance period.
2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 29 |
2016-2018 PBRSUs
The performance-based RSUs granted in 2016 matured and vested as of December 31, 2018. The performance measures, targets and payout levels for the PBRSUs granted in 2016 are as follows:
2016-2018 Performance Measures |
Threshold (2) | Target (2) | Maximum (2) | Weighting | Result | |||||||||
Relative (1) Measures |
||||||||||||||
TSR (3) |
25th Percentile Ranking vs Peer Companies |
50th Percentile Ranking vs Peer Companies | 90th Percentile Ranking vs Peer Companies | 40% | 43 | % | ||||||||
Operating ROE (4) |
40% | 39 | % | |||||||||||
Absolute Measure |
||||||||||||||
Total Written Premium Growth (5) |
2% | 3% | 4% | 20% | 13 | % | ||||||||
Total | 95 | % |
Notes:
(1) | Peer group comprised of Russell 2000® Index insurance companies excluding brokerage, reinsurance, financial guarantee, and health companies. |
(2) | Threshold award (25th percentile) is 50% of target LTIP opportunity; Target award (50th percentile) is 100% of target; Maximum (90th percentile) is 200% of target. Awards for results between Threshold-Target and Target-Maximum are interpolated. |
(3) | Total Shareholder Return for the three-year period. Measured from the average price five trading days before and five trading days after the beginning of the measurement period (1/1/16) to the average price five trading days before and five trading days after the end of the measurement period (12/31/18). Source: Bloomberg |
(4) | Average annual Operating Income Return on Average Equity (excluding the fair value adjustment for investments) for the three-year performance period. Source: SNL. |
(5) | Total Written Premium Growth is measured as the CAGR over the period from 12/31/2015 to 12/31/2018. |
Strategic Incentive Grants
As disclosed in our 2016, 2017, and 2018 Proxy Statements, in March 2016, we made strategic equity grants to key executives, including four of the 2018 NEOs, under our CECP. Each executive received a provisional equity grant of PBRSUs contingent on a corporate financial performance goal (50%) and individual strategic goals (50%).
These awards were specifically designed to address key priorities during the Companys strategic evolution and are not an ongoing component of our executive compensation program. The Committee believes that successful achievement of these strategic objectives drives incremental value for Shareholders.
Each executives entire award was subject to satisfaction of an objective threshold Company-wide performance goal, Earnings per Share (EPS), for any portion of the award to vest. During the period beginning on January 1, 2016, and ending on December 31, 2018, the Company must have achieved an aggregate of at least $4.00 of core earnings per diluted share. The Company exceeded this goal, and 50% of each award vested as of January 1, 2019.
The remaining 50% of the award was based on achievement of individual strategic goals, which were disclosed in the 2017 Proxy Statement for Ms. Zuraitis, Mr. Sharpe and Mr. Caldwell. Upon his promotion to CFO, Mr. Conklin assumed the goals of our prior CFO, Dwayne Hallman. Mr. Hallmans goals were also disclosed in the 2017 Proxy Statement. In addition, Mr. Conklin had individual goals based on his prior role of Senior Vice President & Controller, including improvements to our internal controls over financial reporting, the financial close process, and external audit processes.
30 | 2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
The individual goal-based PBRSUs:
| Do not vest unless the established individual strategic goals are achieved during the performance period beginning on January 1, 2016, and ending on December 31, 2018; |
| Are reduced to zero, if the $4 EPS goal is not achieved; |
| Cannot exceed the number of shares granted (except through accrued dividend equivalents); and |
| Will be reduced if all individual strategic goals and their components are partially met. |
The Committee reviewed progress toward these goals throughout the performance period. Following a thorough review at the conclusion of the performance period, the Committee, and the full Board in the case of the CEOs award, agreed with the CEOs assessment that each of the executives met or exceeded their individual goals. Therefore, the entire award vested as of January 1, 2019.
Additional Pay Practices
Stock Ownership & Holding Guidelines
Our Executive Officers are required to accumulate and maintain beneficial stock ownership calculated as a percentage of base salary - as displayed in the table below:
Position |
Stock
| |
CEO |
500% | |
Executive Vice President |
350% | |
Senior Vice President |
300% | |
Controller |
200% |
We use book value to measure the value of the shares we require the NEOs to own because book value is less volatile than stock price. For this purpose, the Companys book value per share is determined by dividing total Shareholders equity, less the fair value adjustment for investments, by the number of outstanding shares of common stock.
The NEOs must satisfy stock ownership guidelines within five years of attaining their position. Stock ownership may be achieved by direct ownership or beneficial ownership through a spouse, child, or trust. The following types of beneficial ownership are considered in determining stock ownership: direct ownership, shares held through our Horace Mann 401(k) Plan, and RSUs (vested and unvested). Outstanding stock options are not used in determining stock ownership.
Beginning with stock option grants made in 2011, NEOs are required to hold shares equivalent to any proceeds from a long-term incentive stock option exercise, net of exercise price and related taxes and the costs of the exercise, for a minimum of 12 months after the date of exercise. As part of its 2017 overall review of the executive compensation program, the Committee reviewed the stock ownership guidelines for the Executive Officers, and determined they were appropriate and will be continued in 2018.
2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 31 |
As indicated in the following chart, all NEOs have met or exceeded their stock ownership guidelines except for Mr. Benham. Mr. Benham joined the Company in November 2017 and is on target to meet the requirement by the deadline.
Named Individual |
Stock Ownership Target % |
Stock Ownership Actual % |
Stock Ownership (1) |
Book Value (2) |
||||||||||
Marita Zuraitis
|
500%
|
|
1142%
|
|
|
352,771
|
|
|
$10,276,225
|
| ||||
Bret A. Conklin
|
350%
|
|
586%
|
|
|
70,433
|
|
|
$ 2,051,722
|
| ||||
Matthew P. Sharpe
|
350%
|
|
916%
|
|
|
133,648
|
|
|
$ 3,893,172
|
| ||||
William J. Caldwell
|
350%
|
|
456%
|
|
|
60,296
|
|
|
$ 1,756,412
|
| ||||
Bret L. Benham
|
350%
|
|
83%
|
|
|
9,981
|
|
|
$ 290,760
|
| ||||
HMN Stock Price @ 12/31/2018 = |
$37.45 |
| ||||||||||||
HM Book Value @ 12/31/2018 = |
$29.13 |
(1) | Represents share ownership as of 12/31/2018 |
(2) | Represents book value per share excluding the fair value adjustment for investments |
Minimum Vesting Period
In 2017, through an amendment approved by the Board, the Company updated the CECP to reflect a minimum vesting period of one year for all equity grants. No portion of any equity grant, including Stock Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units, will become vested before the first anniversary of the grant date except in the cases of death or disability.
Annual Performance and Pay Review
To further reinforce a performance-based culture and the tie between Company results and compensation, the Committee reviews each Executive Officers performance annually, coinciding with the review of corporate performance results. Each Executive Officer is reviewed not only on prior year business results but also on the individuals demonstration of leadership skills and progress on specific strategic initiatives and other key priorities. The Committee also considers any adjustments to base salary, annual incentive opportunity, and long-term incentive opportunity at this review. The Committee recognizes the need to have market-competitive compensation opportunities to attract, retain, and reward high performing executive talent.
32 | 2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Risk Assessment
Our programs are structured to discourage excessive risk-taking through a balanced use of compensation vehicles and metrics with an overall goal of delivering sustained long-term Shareholder value while aligning our executives interests with those of our Shareholders. To this end, management and CAP conduct, and the Committee and the Boards outside legal counsel reviews, an annual risk analysis of the compensation plans and incentive metrics. Our executive compensation program requires that a substantial portion of each Executive Officers compensation be contingent on delivering performance results. In addition, a significant portion of our NEOs compensation is delivered in equity over a multi-year timeframe. The Committee has been advised by the Boards outside legal counsel and agrees that no unreasonable risk exists that a compensation policy or incentive plan would have a material adverse impact on the Company.
Succession Planning Process
To mitigate enterprise risk and leadership gaps, the Committee oversees and monitors the Companys succession planning process on a regular basis. This process identifies candidates that have the skill sets, background, training, and industry knowledge to assume critical positions on an emergency basis and also for the long-term, if necessary. The Companys succession plan is also reviewed by the full Board annually.
Minimal Use of Employment Agreements
The Company does not have any individual employment agreements with any Executive Officer and intends to continue to minimize their use, while recognizing that in isolated situations an agreement may be needed for attraction and retention of key executive talent.
Executive Severance and Change in Control Plans
To maintain market competitiveness and allow for the successful recruitment of key executives, the Company maintains the Horace Mann Service Corporation Executive Severance Plan (Executive Severance Plan) and the Horace Mann Service Corporation Executive Change in Control Plan (CIC Plan). The Executive Severance Plan provides benefits due to loss of position with or without a change in control. The CIC Plan is intended to provide a level of security consistent with market practices, mitigate some of the conflicts an executive may be exposed to in a potential acquisition or merger situation, and serve to ensure a more stable transition if a corporate transaction were to occur. The CIC Plan provides for benefits only in the event of the loss of position following a change in control, as defined in the CIC Plan. Participants in the CIC Plan are designated by position. This plan does not have tax gross-up provisions. Currently, all of the NEOs participate in the Executive Severance and CIC Plans. The CIC Plan does not permit duplicate benefits under the Executive Severance Plan.
The multiple is based on the sum of salary plus target annual incentive, payable in the form of salary continuation (for the Executive Severance Plan), and payable in a lump sum (for the CIC Plan), based on the following table:
Multiple | ||||||
Named Individual | Executive Severance |
Change In Control | ||||
Marita Zuraitis
|
2.0
|
2.5
| ||||
Bret A. Conklin
|
1.5
|
2.0
| ||||
Matthew P. Sharpe
|
1.5
|
2.0
| ||||
William J. Caldwell
|
1.5
|
2.0
| ||||
Bret L. Benham
|
1.5
|
2.0
|
2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 33 |
Retirement Plans
The NEOs participate in our Horace Mann 401(k) Plan and a nonqualified supplemental defined contribution plan designed to provide benefits that cannot be provided under our tax-qualified defined
contribution plan because of certain limitations imposed by the Internal Revenue Code (IRC). Each of these two plans includes a Company contribution. The amounts contributed for each NEO are included in the Summary Compensation Table. These types of plans are customarily offered within our industry. No NEO participates in the Companys defined benefit plan or supplemental defined benefit retirement plan because participation in those plans was limited to individuals hired prior to January 1, 1999 and all of our NEOs were hired after that date.
Deferred Compensation
Prior to 2009, the LTIP permitted certain elective deferrals. Pre-2009 account balances are maintained in notional deferred Common Stock equivalent units, which accrue dividend equivalents at the same rate as dividends paid to our Shareholders. These dividend equivalents are converted into additional deferred Common Stock equivalent units. Mr. Conklin is the only NEO with an account balance under this arrangement.
Nonqualified Supplemental Defined Contribution and Other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans
The Company sponsors an unfunded nonqualified supplemental defined contribution plan, the Nonqualified Supplemental Defined Contribution Plan (NQDCP), which covers only the base salary compensation in excess of the IRC Section 401(a)(17) limit, which in 2018 was $275,000. The NQDCP accounts are established for the executives at the time their compensation exceeds the IRC Section 401(a)(17) limit and the NEOs are credited with an amount equal to 5% of the excess. In addition, the NQDCP accounts are credited with the same rate of return as the stable value fund available as an investment option under the qualified plan sponsored by the Company for all employees.
The Company offered a nonqualified deferred compensation plan to executives, which allowed them to defer receipt of long-term incentive cash compensation prior to 2009 when cash was a component of the LTIP. Executives were allowed to defer up to 100% of their earned long-term cash incentive into HMECs deferred Common Stock equivalent units. All the NEOs except Mr. Conklin were hired after 2009 and do not have an account in the plan.
Clawbacks
The Committee believes that our compensation program should reward performance that supports the Companys culture of integrity through compliance with applicable laws and regulations and our codes of ethics and conduct. As a further step to support that belief, the Committee has determined that all Executive Officers are subject to the same standards as the CEO and CFO regarding cash compensation clawbacks as defined under Section 304 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. In addition, under the CECP, the Company is entitled to recover any cash or equity award if it is determined that an executives own misconduct contributed materially to the executives receipt of an award. If changes are made in future applicable legislative or regulatory guidance, the Company will modify the current clawback provisions to comply.
Hedging, Pledging Prohibitions
NEOs and other Executive Officers are prohibited from engaging in hedging transactions in our common stock. They are also prohibited from pledging their shares of our Common Stock.
Perquisites and Personal Benefits
The only perquisites we provide are financial planning services and an executive physical program, both of which are commonly provided among our peer companies. Please see the Summary Compensation Table for further details. Our NEOs do not receive other personal benefits.
34 | 2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Tax Implications
Favorable tax treatment of the various elements of the Companys total compensation program is an important, but not the sole, consideration in the design of the compensation program. On December 22, 2017, legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (Tax Act) was enacted that significantly impacts the tax treatment of executive compensation.
Historically, Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code provided an exemption from taxation for compensation in excess of $1,000,000 paid to certain Executive Officers pursuant to a plan that was approved by our Shareholders, and is performance-related and non-discretionary. The Tax Act eliminated the exception for performance-based compensation, and provides that any individual identified as a Covered Employee (CEO, CFO and the three other most highly compensated Executive Officers) beginning after December 31, 2016 remains a Covered Employee for all future years, and applies the $1,000,000 limitation to any compensation paid to such Covered Employees after employment ends or death. The Tax Act also included a transition rule according to which the deduction limitation as described above, does not apply to compensation arrangements in place pursuant to a written binding contract that was in effect on November 2, 2017 as long as it is not materially modified after that date. To the extent applicable to our existing contracts and awards, the Committee may avail itself of this transition rule. However, due to uncertainties as to the application and interpretation of Section 162(m), including the scope of the transition relief, we expect that compensation paid to our Executive Officers in excess of $1,000,000 generally will not be deductible.
The Committee believes that Shareholder interests are best served by not restricting the Committees discretion and flexibility in developing compensation programs, even though such programs may result in certain non-deductible compensation expenses as a result of the Tax Act, and still intends to utilize performance-based compensation programs.
2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 35 |
Compensation Tables
Summary Compensation Table
The following table sets forth information regarding compensation of the Companys CEO, CFO, and the three other most highly compensated executive officers during 2018, 2017, and 2016.
Name & Principal Position |
Year | Salary ($) (1) |
Bonus ($) (2) |
Stock Awards ($) (3) |
Option Awards ($) (4) |
Non-Equity ($) (5) |
All Other Compensation ($) |
Total ($) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marita Zuraitis President & Chief Executive Officer
|
|
2018 |
|
|
891,667 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
1,190,000 |
|
|
510,000 |
|
|
966,745 |
|
|
68,578 |
|
|
3,626,990 |
| ||||||||
2017 | 841,667 | 0 | 1,085,000 | 465,000 | 803,455 | 60,261 | 3,255,383 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
|
800,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
2,580,000
|
|
|
420,000
|
|
|
898,240
|
|
|
57,593
|
|
|
4,755,833
|
| |||||||||
Bret A. Conklin Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer |
|
2018 |
|
|
345,000 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
227,500 |
|
|
97,500 |
|
|
224,429 |
|
|
25,354 |
|
|
919,783 |
| ||||||||
2017 | 308,126 | 0 | 226,000 | 54,000 | 134,200 | 18,079 | 740,405 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
|
270,842
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
372,500
|
|
|
52,500
|
|
|
106,436
|
|
|
17,201
|
|
|
819,479
|
| |||||||||
Matthew P. Sharpe Executive Vice President, Strategy & Business Development |
|
2018 |
|
|
423,333 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
385,000 |
|
|
165,000 |
|
|
375,387 |
|
|
43,724 |
|
|
1,392,444 |
| ||||||||
2017 | 412,500 | 0 | 395,500 | 169,500 | 236,264 | 41,696 | 1,255,460 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
|
400,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
950,000
|
|
|
150,000
|
|
|
269,472
|
|
|
40,927
|
|
|
1,810,399
|
| |||||||||
William J. Caldwell Executive Vice President, Property & Casualty |
|
2018 |
|
|
383,333 |
|
|
0 |
|
|
280,000 |
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
249,366 |
|
|
42,162 |
|
|
1,074,861 |
| ||||||||
2017 | 370,833 | 0 | 252,000 | 108,000 | 212,398 | 41,080 | 984,311 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
|
350,000
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
770,000
|
|
|
105,000
|
|
|
196,490
|
|
|
39,885
|
|
|
1,461,375
|
| |||||||||
Bret L. Benham Executive Vice President, Life & Retirement |
|
2018 |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
100,000 |
|
|
175,000 |
|
|
75,000 |
|
|
189,735 |
|
|
81,085 |
|
|
970,820 |
| ||||||||
2017 | 34,551 | 0 | 250,000 | 0 | 16,491 | 0 | 301,042 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2016
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
n/a
|
|
|
n/a
|
| |||||||||
(1) | Represents each NEOs actual base salary earnings as of December 31, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Mr. Benham was hired in 2017. |
(2) | For 2018 this represents a signing bonus for Mr. Benham. |
(3) | Represents the grant date fair value of service-based and performance-based RSUs granted in 2016, 2017, and 2018. Performance-based RSUs are valued based on the probable performance of Target with the potential of 50% to 200% being earned based on performance results. In 2016, it represents the grant date fair value of service based and performance based RSUs, and performance based RSUs based on strategic initiatives. In 2017, it represents the grant date fair value of service based and performance based RSUs. In 2018, it represents the grant date fair value of service based and performance based RSUs. |
(4) | Represents the grant date fair value of $7.13 per share for stock options granted on March 6, 2018, the grant date fair value of $6.60 per share for stock options granted on March 7, 2017, and the grant date fair value of $5.01 per share for stock options granted on March 9, 2016. |
(5) | Represents the cash payout for the AIP earned in each year. Mr. Sharpes AIP includes an additional $100,000 related to NTA acquisition. |
36 | 2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Detail of All Other Compensation
The following table sets forth information regarding all other compensation paid to, or earned by, the NEOs in 2018.
Name & Principal Position
|
Perquisites &
|
Relocation
|
Company to Defined Contribution
|
Total
|
||||||||||||
Marita Zuraitis
|
15,745 | 0 | 52,833 | 68,578 | ||||||||||||
Bret A. Conklin
|
0 | 0 | 25,354 | 25,354 | ||||||||||||
Matthew P. Sharpe
|
15,745 | 0 | 27,979 | 43,724 | ||||||||||||
William J. Caldwell
|
15,745 | 0 | 26,417 | 42,162 | ||||||||||||
Bret L. Benham Executive Vice President, Life & Retirement
|
13,760 | 44,388 | 22,938 | 81,085 |
(1) | Includes the use of a financial planning service to help minimize distractions and help ensure appropriate focus on his or her Company responsibilities. |
CEO Pay Ratio
Pursuant to Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, we calculate a ratio of total pay for our CEO compared to total pay for our median employee (CEO Pay Ratio). To identify our median employee, we use total cash at target (annualized base salary as of 12/31/2018 plus annual bonus target), as we believe this is the most representative measure of annual compensation for our broader employee population.
Once the median employee is identified, we compile the same pay elements for the median employee that we do for the NEOs as displayed in the Summary Compensation Table. We then compare total pay of our CEO (as displayed in the Total $ column of the Summary Compensation Table) to total pay of our median employee.
The following table sets forth information regarding CEO Pay Ratio.
Total Pay |
Pay Ratio |
|||||||
Chief Executive Officer |
$ | 3,626,990 | 56:1 | |||||
Median Employee |
$ | 64,357 |
2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 37 |
Grants of Plan Based Awards
The following table sets forth information concerning the grant of the 2018 Annual Incentive and the grant of the 2018 Long-term Incentive for the 2018 2020 performance period. Actual payouts under the 2018 AIP are included in the Summary Compensation Table. Payouts for the 2018 Long-term incentive grant and the determination of the actual RSUs earned will not occur until after the completion of the 2018 2020 performance period.
Named Individual | Grant Date |
Estimated Future Payouts |
Estimated Future Payouts Under Equity Incentive Plan Awards (2) |
All |
All Other Option Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Options (#) (4) |
Exercise or Base Price of Option Awards ($/Sh) |
Grant Date Fair Value of Stock Option Awards ($) (5) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Incentive Plan |
Threshold ($) |
Target ($) |
Maximum ($) |
Threshold (#) |
Target (#) |
Maximum (#) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marita Zuraitis |
AIP | 445,834 | 891,667 | 1,783,334 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/6/2018 | LTI | N/A | N/A | N/A | 9,896 | 19,791 | 39,582 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/6/2018 | LTI | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 7,917 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/6/2018 | LTI | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 71,532 | $ | 42.95 | 510,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bret A. Conklin |
AIP | 103,500 | 207,000 | 414,000 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/6/2018 | LTI | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1,892 | 3,784 | 7,568 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/6/2018 | LTI | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1,515 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/6/2018 | LTI | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 13,676 | $ | 42.95 | 97,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Matthew P. Sharpe |
AIP | 127,000 | 254,000 | 508,000 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/6/2018 | LTI | N/A | N/A | N/A | 3,202 | 6,403 | 12,806 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/6/2018 | LTI | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2,562 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/6/2018 | LTI | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 23,144 | $ | 42.95 | 165,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
William J. Caldwell |
AIP | 115,000 | 230,000 | 460,000 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/6/2018 | LTI | N/A | N/A | N/A | 2,329 | 4,657 | 9,314 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/6/2018 | LTI | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1,863 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/6/2018 | LTI | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 16,832 | $ | 42.95 | 120,000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bret L. Benham |
AIP | 87,500 | 175,000 | 350,000 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/6/2018 | LTI | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1,456 | 2,911 | 5,822 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/6/2018 | LTI | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 1,167 | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3/6/2018 | LTI | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 10,520 | $ | 42.95 | 75,000 |
N/A | = Not applicable |
(1) | Represents performance-based 2018 Annual Incentive. |
(2) | Represents the performance-based portion of the 2018 Long-term Incentive grant. |
(3) | Represents the service-based RSU portion of the 2018 Long-term Incentive grant. |
(4) | Represents the stock option portion of the 2018 Long-term Incentive grant. |
(5) | Totals equate to each NEOs 2018 Long-term Incentive amount. The fair value of stock options was determined using the Black-Scholes model. |
38 | 2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End
The following table sets forth information regarding the exercisable and unexercisable stock options, as well as the unvested RSUs held by each NEO at December 31, 2018.
Option Awards |
Stock Awards (Restricted Stock Units) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Named Individual | Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Exercisable (#) |
Number
of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable (#) (1) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) |
Option Exercise Price ($) |
Grant Date |
Option Expiration Date |
Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested (#) (2) |
Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested ($) (3) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights that Have Not Vested (#) (4) |
Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units, or Other Rights that Have Not Vested ($) (3) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Marita Zuraitis |
9,248 | 0 | 0 | $ | 22.69 | 05/22/13 | 05/22/20 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
33,296 | 0 | 0 | $ | 28.88 | 03/05/14 | 03/05/24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
22,197 | 7,399 | 0 | $ | 32.35 | 03/04/15 | 03/04/25 | 19,344 | $ | 724,433 | 120,466 | $ | 4,511,452 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
41,958 | 41,958 | 0 | $ | 31.01 | 03/09/16 | 03/09/26 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
17,606 | 52,818 | 0 | $ | 41.95 | 03/07/17 | 03/07/27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 71,532 | 0 | $ | 42.95 | 03/06/18 | 03/06/28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bret A. Conklin |
7,488 | 0 | 0 | $ | 17.32 | 03/07/12 | 03/07/19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5,552 | 0 | 0 | $ | 20.60 | 03/05/13 | 03/05/20 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5,828 | 0 | 0 | $ | 28.88 | 03/05/14 | 03/05/24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
3,534 | 1,178 | 0 | $ | 32.35 | 03/04/15 | 03/04/25 | 3,892 | $ | 145,755 | 19,243 | $ | 720,650 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
5,246 | 5,246 | 0 | $ | 31.01 | 03/09/16 | 03/09/26 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2,045 | 6,135 | 0 | $ | 41.95 | 03/07/17 | 03/07/27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 13,676 | 0 | $ | 42.95 | 03/06/18 | 03/06/28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Matthew P. Sharpe |
4,813 | 0 | 0 | $ | 28.88 | 03/05/14 | 03/05/24 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
10,089 | 3,363 | 0 | $ | 32.35 | 03/04/15 | 03/04/25 | 6,788 | $ | 254,211 | 43,486 | $ | 1,628,551 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
14,986 | 14,986 | 0 | $ | 31.01 | 03/09/16 | 03/09/26 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
6,418 | 19,254 | 0 | $ | 41.95 | 03/07/17 | 03/07/27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 23,144 | 0 | $ | 42.95 | 03/06/18 | 03/06/28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
William J. Caldwell |
3,880 | 2,018 | 0 | $ | 32.35 | 03/04/15 | 03/04/25 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 10,490 | 0 | $ | 31.01 | 03/09/16 | 03/09/26 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
4,090 | 12,270 | 0 | $ | 41.95 | 03/07/17 | 03/07/27 | 4,411 | $ | 165,192 | 33,855 | $ | 1,267,870 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
0 | 16,832 | 0 | $ | 42.95 | 03/06/18 | 03/06/28 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bret L. Benham |
0 | 10,520 | 0 | $ | 42.95 | 03/06/18 | 03/06/28 | 3,990 | $ | 149,426 | 5,781 | $ | 216,498 |
(1) | Long-term Incentive stock option grants are service-based and all exercisable options vest on each anniversary of the grant date at a rate of 25% of the original grant. |
(2) | Represents the unvested service-based RSUs granted in 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018. |
(3) | Represents the value of the RSUs based on the closing price of our Common Stock ($37.45) at December 31, 2018. |
(4) | The performance-based RSUs granted in 2016 will not be earned until the end of the 2016-2018 performance period. RSUs earned at the end of the performance period will vest 100% in 2019. The performance-based RSUs granted in 2017 will not be earned until the end of the 2017-2019 performance period. RSUs earned at the end of the performance period will vest 100% in 2020. The performance-based RSUs granted in 2018 will not be earned until the end of the 2018-2020 performance period. RSUs earned at the end of the performance period will vest 100% in 2021. |
2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 39 |
Option Exercises and Stock Vesting
The following table sets forth information regarding options exercised and stock awards acquired on vesting by the NEOs in 2018.
Named Individual
|
Option Awards |
Stock Awards |
||||||||||||||||
Number of Shares
|
Value Realized
|
Number of
|
Value on ($) (1)
|
|||||||||||||||
Marita Zuraitis
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
32,827
|
|
|
1,411,913
|
| ||||||
Bret A. Conklin
|
|
7,100
|
|
|
183,131
|
|
|
6,029
|
|
|
258,960
|
| ||||||
Matthew P. Sharpe
|
|
16,400
|
|
|
324,281
|
|
|
14,236
|
|
|
612,088
|
| ||||||
William J. Caldwell
|
|
19,289
|
|
|
267,367
|
|
|
7,928
|
|
|
341,218
|
| ||||||
Bret L. Benham
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
(1) | The value realized on vesting of stock awards is determined by multiplying the number of shares vested by the closing stock price on the date of vesting. The actual amounts realized from vested stock awards will depend upon the sale price of the shares when they are actually sold. |
Nonqualified Supplemental Defined Contribution and Other Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plans
The following table sets forth information regarding participation by the NEOs in the Companys NQDCP and the nonqualified deferred compensation plan as of December 31, 2018.
Named Individual
|
Account Name
|
Executive
|
Registrant
|
Aggregate
|
Aggregate
|
|||||||||||||
Marita Zuraitis | NQDCP Account | 0 | 30,833 | 1,817 | 124,684 | |||||||||||||
Deferred Compensation Account
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
| ||||||
Bret A. Conklin | NQDCP Account |
|
0
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
14,449
|
| |||||
Deferred Compensation Account
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
-51,224
|
|
|
350,156
|
| ||||||
Matthew P. Sharpe | NQDCP Account |
|
0
|
|
|
7,417
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
37,270
|
| |||||
Deferred Compensation Account
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
| ||||||
William J. Caldwell | NQDCP Account |
|
0
|
|
|
5,417
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
18,105
|
| |||||
Deferred Compensation Account
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
| ||||||
Bret L. Benham | NQDCP Account |
|
0
|
|
|
3,750
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
3,757
|
| |||||
Deferred Compensation Account
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
(1) | Represents the 2018 NQDCP registrant Company contributions. These contributions are included in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2018. |
(2) | Represents (a) the gains/losses in the NQDCP in 2018 and (b) the change in the deferred compensation account balance reflecting changes in the closing stock price of HMEC Common Stock from December 31, 2017 to December 31, 2018, each excluding contributions reflected in the first two columns. |
40 | 2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Illustration of Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
The following table presents the estimated payments and benefits that would have been payable as of the end of 2018 in the event of separation due to disability or death, cause, voluntary termination of employment, retirement, involuntary termination of employment without cause, and a change of control of the Company.
Consistent with SEC requirements, these estimated amounts have been calculated as if the NEOs employment had been terminated as of December 31, 2018, the last business day of 2018, using the closing price of our Common Stock on that date ($37.45). The amounts reported in the following table are hypothetical amounts based on the disclosure of compensation information about the NEOs. Actual payments will depend on the circumstances and timing of any termination of employment or other triggering event.
Estimated Payments ($) Assuming Termination as of December 31, 2018 (1)(2) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Name & Benefits |
Disability or Death |
For Cause |
Voluntary |
Involuntary Termination w/o Cause |
Change in Control |
|||||||||||||||
Marita Zuraitis |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Severance |
0 | 0 | 0 | 3,600,000 | 4,500,000 | |||||||||||||||
AIP |
900,000 | 0 | 0 | 900,000 | 900,000 | |||||||||||||||
Acceleration of Stock Options |
307,944 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 307,944 | |||||||||||||||
Acceleration of RSUs |
4,130,425 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4,856,479 | |||||||||||||||
Health and Welfare |
0 | 0 | 0 | 23,175 | 23,175 | |||||||||||||||
Modified Cap Adjustment (3) |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||
TOTAL |
|
5,338,369
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
4,523,175
|
|
|
10,587,598
|
| |||||
Bret A. Conklin |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Severance |
0 | 0 | 0 | 840,000 | 1,120,000 | |||||||||||||||
AIP |
210,000 | 0 | 0 | 210,000 | 210,000 | |||||||||||||||
Acceleration of Stock Options |
39,792 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39,792 | |||||||||||||||
Acceleration of RSUs |
669,238 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 805,625 | |||||||||||||||
Health and Welfare |
0 | 0 | 0 | 34,032 | 34,032 | |||||||||||||||
Modified Cap Adjustment (3) |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | -346,094 | |||||||||||||||
TOTAL |
|
919,030
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,084,032
|
|
|
1,863,355
|
| |||||
Matthew P. Sharpe |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Severance |
0 | 0 | 0 | 1,020,000 | 1,360,000 | |||||||||||||||
AIP |
255,000 | 0 | 0 | 255,000 | 255,000 | |||||||||||||||
Acceleration of Stock Options |
113,661 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 113,661 | |||||||||||||||
Acceleration of RSUs |
1,498,462 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,742,848 | |||||||||||||||
Health and Welfare |
0 | 0 | 0 | 31,630 | 31,630 | |||||||||||||||
Modified Cap Adjustment (3) |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||
TOTAL |
|
1,867,123
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,306,630
|
|
|
3,503,139
|
| |||||
William J. Caldwell |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Severance |
0 | 0 | 0 | 924,000 | 1,232,000 | |||||||||||||||
AIP |
231,000 | 0 | 0 | 231,000 | 231,000 | |||||||||||||||
Acceleration of Stock Options |
77,847 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 77,847 | |||||||||||||||
Acceleration of RSUs |
1,160,420 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1,330,561 | |||||||||||||||
Health and Welfare |
0 | 0 | 0 | 21,674 | 21,674 | |||||||||||||||
Modified Cap Adjustment (3) |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
|
1,469,267
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
1,176,674
|
|
|
2,893,082
|
| |||||
Bret L. Benham |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Severance |
0 | 0 | 0 | 787,500 | 1,050,000 | |||||||||||||||
AIP |
175,000 | 0 | 0 | 175,000 | 175,000 | |||||||||||||||
Acceleration of Stock Options |
0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||||||||||||||
Acceleration of RSUs |
248,376 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 354,951 | |||||||||||||||
Health and Welfare |
0 | 0 | 0 | 23,151 | 23,151 | |||||||||||||||
Modified Cap Adjustment (3) |
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||||||
TOTAL
|
|
423,376
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
985,651
|
|
|
1,603,102
|
|
N/A Not applicable
(1) | All AIP and LTI earned payouts are assumed to be at target. |
(2) | None of the NEOs were retirement eligible at December 31, 2018. |
(3) | Benefit reduction to avoid the imposition of a golden parachute tax. |
2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 41 |
The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this Proxy Statement with management. Based on our review of, and the discussions with management with respect to, the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE
STEPHEN J. HASENMILLER, Chairman
BEVERLEY J. MCCLURE and H. WADE REECE, Members
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2018 regarding outstanding awards and shares remaining available for future issuance under the Companys equity compensation plans (excluding the Horace Mann 401(k) plan):
Equity Compensation Plans |
Securities to be |
Weighted Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options, Warrants and Rights |
Securities Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (4) |
|||||||||||
Plans Approved by Shareholders |
||||||||||||||
Stock Incentive Plans (1) |
||||||||||||||
Stock Options |
774,821 | $ | 36.65 | N/A | ||||||||||
Restricted Stock Units (2) |
1,008,249 | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||
Subtotal |
1,783,070 | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||
Deferred Compensation (2)(3) |
56,786 | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||
Subtotal |
1,839,856 | N/A | 1,826,449 | |||||||||||
Plans Not Approved by Shareholders |
N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||||
Total |
1,839,856 | N/A | 1,826,449 |
N/A Not applicable
(1) | Includes grants under the CECP. |
(2) | No exercise price is associated with the shares of Common Stock issuable under these rights. |
(3) | The CECP permits Directors and participants in certain cash incentive programs to defer compensation in the form of deferred cash RSUs, which can be settled in cash at the end of the specified deferral period. For purposes of the CECP, deferred cash RSUs are valued at 100% of the fair market value of Common Stock on the date of crediting to the participants deferral account. There are 44 senior executives of the Company currently eligible to participate in the CECP. The CECP does not reserve a specific number of shares for delivery in settlement of deferred cash RSUs but instead provides that shares will be available to the extent needed for such settlements. Further information on the CECP appears in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis. |
(4) | Excludes securities reflected in the Securities to be Issued column and represents shares remaining as part of a fungible share pool. The pool of shares is reduced by 2.5 shares for every full-value award that is granted. |
42 | 2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
The following provides biographical information, as of March 15, 2019, with respect to the Executive Officers of the Company and its subsidiaries who are not Directors of the Company (Marita Zuraitis, President and Chief Executive Officer, is a Director and is discussed above under Board Nominees).
2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 43 |
44 | 2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership of shares of Common Stock by each person who is known by the Company to own beneficially more than 5% of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock, and by each of the Companys Directors, Board Nominees and NEOs, and by all Directors and Executive Officers of the Company as a group. Information in the table is as of March 15, 2019, except that the ownership information for the 5% beneficial owners is as of December 31, 2018 based on information reported by such persons to the SEC. Except as otherwise indicated, to the Companys knowledge all shares of Common Stock are beneficially owned, and investment and voting power is held solely by the persons named as owners.
Common Stock Ownership |
Beneficial Ownership Amount |
Percent of Class | ||||||
5% Beneficial Owners |
||||||||
BlackRock, Inc. (1) |
5,962,193 | 14.6 | % | |||||
The Vanguard Group, Inc. (2) |
4,253,013 | 10.4 | % | |||||
Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (3) |
3,429,725 | 8.4 | % | |||||
Victory Capital Management Inc. (4) |
2,125,555 | 5.2 | % | |||||
Franklin Mutual Advisers, LLC (5) |
2,056,363 | 5.0 | % | |||||
Silvercrest Asset Management Group, LLC (6) |
2,049,073 | 5.0 | % | |||||
Directors, Board Nominees and Executive Officers |
||||||||
Mark S. Casady |
0 | 0.0 | % | |||||
Daniel A. Domenech (7) |
15,082 | * | ||||||
Stephen J. Hasenmiller |
24,664 | * | ||||||
Ronald J. Helow (8) |
39,242 | * | ||||||
Perry G. Hines |
0 | 0.0 | % | |||||
Mark Konen |
0 | 0.0 | % | |||||
Beverley J. McClure (9) |
15,961 | * | ||||||
H. Wade Reece (10) |
5,663 | * | ||||||
Robert Stricker (11) |
34,828 | * | ||||||
Steven O. Swyers (12) |
12,056 | * | ||||||
Marita Zuraitis (13) |
491,969 | 1.2 | % | |||||
Bret A. Conklin (14) |
96,671 | * | ||||||
Matthew P. Sharpe (15) |
168,733 | * | ||||||
William J. Caldwell (16) |
72,263 | * | ||||||
Bret L. Benham (17) |
3,283 | * | ||||||
All Directors and Executive Officers as a group (17 persons) (18) |
1,059,067 | 2.5 | % |
* Less than 1%
(1) | BlackRock has a principal place of business at 55 East 52nd Street, New York, New York 10055. BlackRock has sole voting power with respect to 5,850,577 shares and sole investment power with respect to 5,962,193 shares. The foregoing is based on Amendment No. 10 to Schedule 13G filed by BlackRock on January 28, 2019. |
(2) | The Vanguard Group, Inc. (Vanguard) has a principal place of business at 100 Vanguard Boulevard, Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355. Vanguard has sole voting power with respect to 40,068 shares, sole investment power with respect to 4,210,859 shares, shared voting power with respect to 5,830 shares and shared investment power with respect to 42,154 shares. The foregoing is based on Amendment No. 8 to Schedule 13G filed by Vanguard on February 12, 2019. |
(3) | Dimensional Fund Advisors LP (Dimensional) has a principal place of business at Building One, 6300 Bee Cave Road, Austin, Texas 78746. Dimensional has sole voting power with respect to 3,315,312 shares and sole investment power with respect to 3,429,725 shares. Dimensional disclaims beneficial ownership of such securities. The foregoing is based on Amendment No. 13 to Schedule 13G filed by Dimensional on February 8, 2019. |
(4) | Victory Capital Management Inc. (Victory) has a principal place of business at 4900 Tiedeman Road, 4th Floor, Brooklyn, Ohio 44144. Victory has sole voting power with respect to 2,084,655 shares and sole investment power with respect to 2,125,555 shares. The foregoing is based on the Schedule 13G filed by Victory on February 1, 2019. |
(5) | Franklin Mutual Advisers, LLC (Franklin) has a principal place of business at 101 John F. Kennedy Parkway, Short Hills, New Jersey 07078. Franklin has sole voting power with respect to 1,894,512 shares and sole investment power with respect to 2,056,363 shares. The foregoing is based on the Schedule 13G filed by Franklin on January 30, 2019. |
(6) | Silvercrest Asset Management Group, LLC (Silvercrest) has a principal place of business at 1330 Avenue of the Americas, 38th Floor, New York, New York 10019. Silvercrest has shared voting and investment power with respect to 2,049,073 shares. The foregoing is based on Amendment No. 5 to Schedule 13G filed by Silvercrest on February 14, 2019. |
2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 45 |
(7) | Consists entirely of 6,671 deferred cash RSUs and 8,411 vested share-based RSUs pursuant to the CECP. |
(8) | Consists entirely of 39,242 vested share-based RSUs pursuant to the CECP. |
(9) | Includes 12,056 vested share-based RSUs pursuant to the CECP. |
(10) | Consists entirely of 5,663 vested share-based RSUs pursuant to the CECP. |
(11) | Includes 10,446 deferred cash RSUs and 12,719 vested share-based RSUs pursuant to the CECP. |
(12) | Consists entirely of 12,056 vested share-based RSUs pursuant to the CECP. |
(13) | Includes 188,172 vested stock options and 259,845 vested share-based RSUs pursuant to the CECP. |
(14) | Includes 31,470 vested stock options, 9,350 deferred cash RSUs and 43,382 vested share-based RSUs pursuant to the CECP. |
(15) | Includes 51,873 vested stock options and 81,398 vested share-based RSUs pursuant to the CECP. |
(16) | Includes 23,531 vested stock options and 27,383 vested share-based RSUs pursuant to the CECP. |
(17) | Includes 2,630 vested stock options and 396 vested share-based RSUs pursuant to the CECP. |
(18) | Includes 345,845 vested stock options, 26,468 deferred cash RSUs and 532,724 vested share-based RSUs pursuant to the CECP. |
46 | 2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis | 47 |
The Companys Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The independent registered public accounting firm selected by the Audit Committee to serve as the Companys auditors for the year ending December 31, 2019 is KPMG LLP. KPMG LLP served in that capacity for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Fees of KPMG LLP
The following were the fees of KPMG LLP for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
Fees | 2018 | 2017 | ||||||
Audit (1) |
$ | 3,405,200 | $ | 3,405,100 | ||||
Audit-Related (2) |
$ | 110,400 | $ | 277,500 | ||||
Tax (3) |
0 | 0 | ||||||
All Other (4) |
$ | 939,800 | 0 |
(1) | Represents the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered by KPMG LLP for the audit of the Companys annual financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, the audit of the Companys internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018 and 2017, the reviews of the financial statements included in the Companys quarterly reports on Forms 10-Q for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 and services in connection with the Companys statutory and regulatory filings for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. |
(2) | Represents the aggregate fees billed for assurance and related services rendered by KPMG LLP that are reasonably related to the audit and review of the Companys financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, exclusive of the fees disclosed under Audit Fees. In 2018 and 2017, KPMG LLP audited the Companys employee benefits plans. Also in 2017, KPMG LLP reported on the Companys SOC1 reports over annuity operations. |
(3) | Represents the aggregate fees billed for tax compliance, consulting and planning services rendered by KPMG LLP during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017. |
(4) | Represents the aggregate fees billed for merger and acquisition due diligence services rendered by KPMG LLP during the year ended December 31, 2018. |
Pre-Approval of Services Provided by the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Audit Committee approves in advance any significant audit and all non-audit engagements or services between the Company and the independent registered public accounting firm. As a practice, the Audit Committee does not allow prohibited non-auditing services as defined by regulatory authorities to be performed by the same firm that audits the Companys annual financial statements. The Audit Committee may delegate to one or more of its members the authority to approve in advance all significant audit and all non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm so long as it is presented to the full Audit Committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting. Pre-approval is not necessary for de minimis audit services as long as such services are presented to the full Audit Committee at the next regularly scheduled meeting. The Audit Committee approved all of the above listed expenses. KPMG LLP did not provide any non-audit related services during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.
48 | 2019 Proxy Statement Compensation Discussion and Analysis |
2019 Proxy Statement Other Matters | 49 |
50 | 2019 Proxy Statement Other Matters |
horacemann.com |
HA-C00385 (Mar. 19)
|
VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information. Vote by 11:59 P.M. ET on 05/21/2019 for shares held directly and by 11:59 P.M. ET on 05/19/2019 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. | |||
HORACE MANN EDUCATORS CORPORATION 1 HORACE MANN PLAZA SPRINGFIELD, IL 62715-0001
|
ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years. | |||
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions. Vote by 11:59 P.M. ET on 05/21/2019 for shares held directly and by 11:59 P.M. ET on 05/19/2019 for shares held in a Plan. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. |
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY
THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR the following: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. | Election of Directors | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nominees
|
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
|
|
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 2 and 3. |
For
|
Against
|
Abstain
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1a |
Mark S. Casady | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1b |
Daniel A. Domenech |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ |
|
2 |
|
Approval of the advisory resolution to approve Named Executive Officers' compensation. |
☐ |
☐ |
☐ | |||||||||||||||||||||||
1c |
Stephen J. Hasenmiller |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1d |
Perry G. Hines |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ | 3 | Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as the company's auditors for the year ending December 31, 2019. | ☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
1e |
Mark E. Konen |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1f |
Beverley J. McClure |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1g |
H. Wade Reece |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |
NOTE: Such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment thereof. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1h |
Robert Stricker |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
1i |
Steven O. Swyers |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1j |
Marita Zuraitis |
☐ | ☐ | ☐ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary,
please give full
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] |
Date | Signature (Joint Owners) | Date |
Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Notice & Proxy Statement, Form 10-K/Annual Report is/are available at www.proxyvote.com
HORACE MANN EDUCATORS CORPORATION | ||||||||
PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS | ||||||||
FOR THE ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS MAY 22, 2019 | ||||||||
The undersigned Shareholder of Horace Mann Educators Corporation (the Company) hereby appoints H. Wade Reece and Marita Zuraitis, or any of them, with full power of substitution, proxies to vote at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company (the Meeting), to be held on May 22, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. Central Daylight Saving Time, at the Horace Mann Lincoln Auditorium, 1 Horace Mann Plaza, Springfield, Illinois, and at any adjournment thereof and to vote all shares of Common Stock of the Company held or owned by the Undersigned as directed on the reverse side and in their discretion upon such other matters as may come before the Meeting. | ||||||||
|
THIS PROXY CARD, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE BUT THE CARD IS SIGNED, THIS PROXY CARD WILL BE VOTED FOR THE ELECTION OF ALL NOMINEES UNDER PROPOSAL 1, FOR PROPOSALS 2 AND 3, AND IN THE DISCRETION OF THE PROXIES WITH RESPECT TO SUCH OTHER BUSINESS AS MAY PROPERLY COME BEFORE THE MEETING. | |||||||
Continued and to be signed on reverse side
|