Filed by Bowne Pure Compliance
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 2008
or
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the Transition Period from to
Commission File Number 000-51446
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
02-0636095 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
Organization) |
|
|
121 South 17th Street
Mattoon, Illinois 61938-3987
(Address of principal executive offices and zip code)
Registrants telephone number, including area code: (217) 235-3311
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer o
|
|
Accelerated filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares of the registrants common stock, $.01 par value, outstanding as of
August 1, 2008 was 29,511,519.
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
106,444 |
|
|
$ |
80,944 |
|
|
$ |
211,858 |
|
|
$ |
163,924 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of services and products
(exclusive of depreciation and
amortization shown separately below) |
|
|
36,108 |
|
|
|
25,788 |
|
|
|
69,971 |
|
|
|
51,417 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
26,911 |
|
|
|
22,296 |
|
|
|
55,055 |
|
|
|
44,595 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
22,350 |
|
|
|
16,606 |
|
|
|
45,221 |
|
|
|
33,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
21,075 |
|
|
|
16,254 |
|
|
|
41,611 |
|
|
|
34,677 |
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
441 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(16,048 |
) |
|
|
(11,688 |
) |
|
|
(34,326 |
) |
|
|
(23,302 |
) |
Investment income |
|
|
4,845 |
|
|
|
1,611 |
|
|
|
9,207 |
|
|
|
3,054 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
(405 |
) |
|
|
(290 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
(9,224 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,224 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
450 |
|
|
|
6,550 |
|
|
|
7,037 |
|
|
|
14,856 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
270 |
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
3,148 |
|
|
|
4,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
5,493 |
|
|
$ |
3,889 |
|
|
$ |
10,112 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share Basic and Diluted |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends declared per common share |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
3
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Amounts in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
10,433 |
|
|
$ |
34,341 |
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $2,127
and $2,440, respectively |
|
|
44,777 |
|
|
|
44,001 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
7,235 |
|
|
|
6,364 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,551 |
|
|
|
4,551 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
13,182 |
|
|
|
10,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
80,178 |
|
|
|
99,615 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
403,780 |
|
|
|
411,647 |
|
Intangibles and other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments |
|
|
94,921 |
|
|
|
94,142 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
526,630 |
|
|
|
526,439 |
|
Customer lists, net |
|
|
135,329 |
|
|
|
146,411 |
|
Tradenames |
|
|
14,291 |
|
|
|
14,291 |
|
Deferred financing costs and other assets |
|
|
8,712 |
|
|
|
12,046 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,263,841 |
|
|
$ |
1,304,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of capital lease obligations |
|
$ |
1,048 |
|
|
$ |
1,010 |
|
Current portion of pension and postretirement benefit obligations |
|
|
7,919 |
|
|
|
8,765 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
12,798 |
|
|
|
17,386 |
|
Advance billings and customer deposits |
|
|
18,970 |
|
|
|
18,167 |
|
Dividends payable |
|
|
11,363 |
|
|
|
11,361 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
20,763 |
|
|
|
28,254 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
72,861 |
|
|
|
84,943 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital lease obligations less current portion |
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
|
1,636 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
880,000 |
|
|
|
890,000 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
97,169 |
|
|
|
97,289 |
|
Pension and postretirement benefit obligations |
|
|
57,200 |
|
|
|
56,729 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
13,610 |
|
|
|
14,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,121,942 |
|
|
|
1,144,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest |
|
|
4,727 |
|
|
|
4,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares,
authorized, 29,511,519 and 29,440,587 issued and
outstanding, respectively |
|
|
295 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
Additional paid in capital |
|
|
279,026 |
|
|
|
278,175 |
|
Accumulated deficit |
|
|
(136,455 |
) |
|
|
(117,452 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
|
(5,694 |
) |
|
|
(5,651 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
137,172 |
|
|
|
155,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,263,841 |
|
|
$ |
1,304,591 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
4
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Amounts in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,889 |
|
|
$ |
10,112 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash
provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
45,221 |
|
|
|
33,235 |
|
Provision for bad debt losses |
|
|
2,322 |
|
|
|
1,858 |
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
|
|
9,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax |
|
|
(3,148 |
) |
|
|
1,103 |
|
Partnership income |
|
|
(4,729 |
) |
|
|
(882 |
) |
Non-cash stock compensation |
|
|
860 |
|
|
|
1,706 |
|
Minority interest in net income of subsidiary |
|
|
405 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing costs |
|
|
806 |
|
|
|
1,668 |
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(3,098 |
) |
|
|
(1,738 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(871 |
) |
|
|
156 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
830 |
|
|
|
(2,538 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
(4,588 |
) |
|
|
(794 |
) |
Accrued expenses and other liabilities |
|
|
(4,943 |
) |
|
|
(7,067 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
42,180 |
|
|
|
37,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities purchased |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,625 |
) |
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(26,286 |
) |
|
|
(16,673 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(26,286 |
) |
|
|
(27,298 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
Proceeds from long-term obligations |
|
|
120,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments made on long-term obligations |
|
|
(136,337 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payment of deferred financing costs |
|
|
(240 |
) |
|
|
(320 |
) |
Payment of capital lease obligation |
|
|
(496 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Purchase and retirement of common stock |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
(22,721 |
) |
|
|
(20,093 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(39,802 |
) |
|
|
(20,401 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(23,908 |
) |
|
|
(10,590 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
34,341 |
|
|
|
26,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
10,433 |
|
|
$ |
16,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
5
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders Equity
Six Months Ended June 30, 2008
(Amounts in thousands, except share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Paid in Capital |
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
Loss |
|
|
Total |
|
Balance, January 1, 2008 |
|
|
29,440,587 |
|
|
$ |
294 |
|
|
$ |
278,175 |
|
|
$ |
(117,452 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,651 |
) |
|
$ |
155,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effects of accounting change regarding
postretirement plan measurement dates
pursuant to SFAS No. 158: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost, interest cost, and expected
return on plan assets for October 1, 2007
through Dececmber 31, 2007, net of ($88)
of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(154 |
) |
Amortization of prior service cost and
net loss for October 1, 2007 through
December 31, 2007, net of ($9) of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(169 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(154 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2008 as adjusted |
|
|
29,440,587 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
|
|
278,175 |
|
|
|
(117,621 |
) |
|
|
(5,636 |
) |
|
|
155,212 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,889 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,889 |
|
Dividends on common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,723 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(22,723 |
) |
Shares issued under employee
plan, net of forfeitures |
|
|
71,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash stock compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
859 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
860 |
|
Purchase and retirement of common stock |
|
|
(535 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
Prior service cost and net loss, net of ($104) of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
(180 |
) |
Change in fair value of cash flow
hedges, net of $72 of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2008 |
|
|
29,511,519 |
|
|
$ |
295 |
|
|
$ |
279,026 |
|
|
$ |
(136,455 |
) |
|
$ |
(5,694 |
) |
|
$ |
137,172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes
6
CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, INC.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007
(Dollars in thousands, except share and per share amounts)
1. Description of Business
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (the
Company) operate under the name Consolidated Communications. The Company is an established rural
local exchange company (RLEC) providing communications services to residential and business
customers in Illinois, Texas and Pennsylvania. With approximately 276,793 local access lines,
73,713 Competitive Local Exchange Carrier (CLEC) access line equivalents, 86,575 digital
subscriber lines (DSL) and 14,112 digital television subscribers, the Company offers a wide range
of telecommunications services, including local and long distance service, Voice Over Internet
Protocol (VOIP) calling, custom calling features, private line services, dial-up and high-speed
Internet access, digital TV, carrier access services, network capacity services over our regional
fiber optic network, directory publishing and CLEC calling services. The Company also operates a
number of complementary businesses, including telemarketing and order fulfillment; telephone
services to county jails and state prisons; equipment sales; operator services; and mobile
services.
2. Presentation of Interim Financial Statements
These unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries and subsidiaries in
which it has a controlling financial interest. All material intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation. These interim statements have been prepared in accordance
with Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) guidelines and do not include all of the
information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for
complete financial statements. These interim financial statements reflect all adjustments that
are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of its financial position and
results of operations for the interim periods. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring
nature. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the
entire year. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial
statements and related notes for the year ended December 31, 2007, which were included in our
annual report on Form 10-K previously filed with the SEC.
3. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or the FASB, issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (SFAS No. 161), Disclosure about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 requires entities
that utilize derivative instruments to provide qualitative disclosures about their objectives and
strategies for using such instruments, as well as any details of credit-risk-related contingent
features contained within derivatives. SFAS No. 161 also requires entities to disclose additional
information about the amounts and location of derivatives located within the financial statements,
how the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, have been applied, and the impact that hedges have
on an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective
for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption
encouraged. The Company currently provides information about its hedging activities and use of
derivatives in its quarterly and annual filings with the SEC, including many of the disclosure
requirements contained within SFAS No. 161. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if
any, of adopting SFAS No. 161 on the Companys disclosures. SFAS No. 161 will have no impact on
the Companys future results of operations and financial condition.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160 (SFAS
No. 160), Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an Amendment of ARB No.
51. SFAS No. 160 clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a consolidated subsidiary should be
reported
as equity in the consolidated financial statements. It also requires consolidated net income
to include the amounts attributable to both the parent and the noncontrolling interest. The
Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 160 on January 1, 2009 and is currently evaluating the impact
of adopting SFAS No. 160 on its future results of operations and financial condition.
7
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised
2007) (SFAS No. 141 (R)), Business
Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) retains the fundamental
requirements of the original pronouncement requiring that the purchase method be used for all
business combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of
one or more businesses in the business combination, establishes the acquisition date as the date
that the acquirer achieves control and requires the acquirer to recognize the assets acquired,
liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interest at their fair values as of the acquisition
date. SFAS No. 141(R) also requires, among other things, that acquisition-related costs be
recognized separately from the acquisition. The Company is required to adopt SFAS No. 141(R)
effective January 1, 2009. SFAS No. 141(R) will generally impact acquisitions made after the date
of adoption.
4. Marketable Securities
In the second quarter of 2007, the Company acquired $10,625 of investments in auction rate
securities which were considered available-for-sale under SFAS No. 115. These securities were
sold in the third quarter of 2007 with no gain or loss to the Company.
5. Acquisition
On December 31, 2007, the Company acquired all of the capital stock of North Pittsburgh
Systems, Inc. (North Pittsburgh). By acquiring all of the capital stock of North Pittsburgh, the
Company acquired an RLEC that serves portions of Allegheny, Armstrong, Butler and Westmoreland
Counties in western Pennsylvania; a CLEC company that serves small to mid-sized business customers
in Pittsburgh and its surrounding suburbs as well as in Butler County; an Internet Service Provider
that furnishes broadband services in western Pennsylvania; and minority interests in three cellular
partnerships and one competitive access provider. The results of operations for North Pittsburgh
are included in the Companys telephone operations segment for December 31, 2007 and thereafter.
The Company accounted for the North Pittsburgh acquisition using the purchase method of
accounting. Accordingly, the financial statements reflect the allocation of the total purchase
price to the net tangible and intangible assets acquired based on their respective fair values. At
the time of the acquisition, 80% of the shares of North Pittsburgh converted into the right to
receive $25.00 per share in cash and each of the remaining shares of North Pittsburgh common stock
converted into the right to receive 1.1061947 shares of common stock of the Company, or 3,318,480
shares of stock valued at $74,398, net of issuance fees. The total purchase price, including
acquisition costs and net of $32,902 of cash acquired, is being allocated according to the
following table which summarizes the preliminary, estimated fair values of the North Pittsburgh
assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
17,729 |
|
Property, plant and equipment |
|
|
117,134 |
|
Customer list |
|
|
49,000 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
214,580 |
|
Investments and other assets |
|
|
53,360 |
|
Liabilities assumed |
|
|
(105,034 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net purchase price |
|
$ |
346,769 |
|
|
|
|
|
8
Because of the proximity of this transaction to year-end, the values of certain assets and
liabilities are based on preliminary valuations and are subject to adjustment as additional
information is obtained. Adjustments of $191 were made to goodwill during the period ended June
30, 2008.
The aggregate purchase price was determined through a negotiated bid and was influenced by the
Companys assessment of the value of the overall North Pittsburgh business. The significant
goodwill value reflects the Companys view that the North Pittsburgh business can generate strong
cash flow, sales and earnings following the acquisition. All of the goodwill recorded as part
of this acquisition was allocated to the telephone operations segment. In accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142,
Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, the
$214,580 in goodwill recorded as part of the North Pittsburgh acquisition is not being amortized,
but will be tested for impairment at least annually. The customer list is being amortized over its
estimated useful life of 5 years. The goodwill and other intangibles associated with this
acquisition did not qualify under the Internal Revenue Code as deductible for tax purposes.
Because the acquisition occurred on December 31, 2007, the Companys results of operations for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 do not include North Pittsburgh. Unaudited pro forma
results of operations data for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 as if the acquisition
had occurred at the beginning of the period presented are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
105,258 |
|
|
$ |
212,661 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
17,399 |
|
|
$ |
31,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,804 |
|
|
$ |
5,143 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share basic |
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
$ |
0.18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income per share diluted |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Goodwill and Customer Lists
The following table summarizes the carrying value of goodwill by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Telephone Operations |
|
$ |
519,446 |
|
|
$ |
519,255 |
|
Other Operations |
|
|
7,184 |
|
|
|
7,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
526,630 |
|
|
$ |
526,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Companys customer lists consist of an established core base of customers that
subscribe to its services. The carrying amount of customer lists is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
$ |
205,648 |
|
|
$ |
205,648 |
|
Less: accumulated amortization |
|
|
(70,319 |
) |
|
|
(59,237 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount |
|
$ |
135,329 |
|
|
$ |
146,411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
The aggregate amortization expense associated with customer lists was $5,541 and $3,209
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively and was $11,082 and $6,443 for the
six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Customer lists are being amortized on a
straight-line basis using a weighted average life of approximately 10 years.
7. Summarized Financial Information for Significant Investments
In connection with the North Pittsburgh Acquisition, the Company acquired a 23.67% ownership
of Pennsylvania
RSA 6(II) wireless limited partnership (the RSA 6(II)). The principal activity
of the RSA 6(II) is providing cellular service to territories that overlap the majority of the
markets served by the Companys North Pittsburgh wireline operations. The Company accounts for
this investment on the equity basis. Unaudited summarized income statement information for the RSA
6(II) was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
26,768 |
|
|
$ |
51,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
5,742 |
|
|
$ |
11,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
5,767 |
|
|
$ |
11,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
5,767 |
|
|
$ |
11,339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Pension Costs and Other Postretirement Benefits
The Company has several defined benefit pension plans covering substantially all of its
hourly employees and certain salaried employees. The plans provide retirement benefits based on
years of service and earnings. The pension plans are generally noncontributory. The Companys
funding policy is to
contribute amounts sufficient to meet the minimum funding requirements as set forth in employee
benefit and tax laws. The Company also has a qualified supplemental pension plan (Restoration
Plan) covering certain former North Pittsburgh employees. The Restoration Plan restores benefits
that are precluded under the pension plan by Internal Revenue Service limits on compensation and
benefits applicable to qualified pension plans and by the exclusion of bonus compensation from the
pension plans definition of earnings.
The Company currently provides other postretirement benefits (Other Benefits)
consisting of health care and life insurance benefits for certain groups of retired employees.
Retirees share in the cost of health care benefits. Retiree contributions for health care benefits
are adjusted periodically based upon either collective bargaining agreements for former hourly
employees or as total costs of the program change for former salaried employees. The Companys
funding policy for retiree health benefits is generally to pay covered expenses as they are
incurred. Postretirement life insurance benefits are fully insured.
10
The following tables present the components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits |
|
|
Other Benefits |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Three months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
546 |
|
|
$ |
345 |
|
|
$ |
252 |
|
|
$ |
219 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
2,806 |
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
385 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(3,255 |
) |
|
|
(1,231 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(147 |
) |
|
|
(248 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
322 |
|
|
$ |
737 |
|
|
$ |
356 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six months ended June 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost |
|
$ |
1,092 |
|
|
$ |
690 |
|
|
$ |
505 |
|
|
$ |
439 |
|
Interest cost |
|
|
5,611 |
|
|
|
2,340 |
|
|
|
1,263 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(6,510 |
) |
|
|
(2,467 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
(293 |
) |
|
|
(495 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
$ |
644 |
|
|
$ |
1,475 |
|
|
$ |
714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 158 (SFAS
No. 158), Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans.
SFAS No. 158 requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined
benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to
recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through
comprehensive income. SFAS No. 158 also requires an employer to measure the funded status of a
plan as of the date of its year-end statement of financial position. The Company was required to
adopt the recognition provisions of SFAS No. 158 effective December 31, 2006; however, the
requirement to measure plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the Companys fiscal
year end is required to be effective as of December 31, 2008. Upon combining the Texas and
Illinois pension plans on December 31, 2007, the Company adopted the measurement date provisions of
SFAS No. 158 effective January 1, 2008 for pension and postretirement plans with measurement dates
other than December 31. The impact of the adoption of the measurement date provisions resulted in
an increase to opening accumulated deficit on January 1, 2008 of $169.
9. Long-Term Debt
Long-term debt consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Senior Secured Credit Facility |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving loan |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Term loan |
|
|
880,000 |
|
|
|
760,000 |
|
Obligations under capital lease |
|
|
2,150 |
|
|
|
2,646 |
|
Senior notes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
130,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
882,150 |
|
|
|
892,646 |
|
Less: current portion |
|
|
(1,048 |
) |
|
|
(1,010 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
881,102 |
|
|
$ |
891,636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
In connection with the acquisition of North Pittsburgh on December 31, 2007, the Company,
through its wholly-owned subsidiaries, entered into a credit agreement with various financial
institutions, which provides for borrowings of up to $950,000 consisting of a $760,000 term loan
facility, a $50,000 revolving credit facility, which was fully available as of June 30, 2008, and a
$140,000 delayed draw term loan facility (DDTL). The DDTLs sole purpose was for the funding of
the redemption of the Companys outstanding senior notes plus any associated fees or redemption
premium. As described below, the Company borrowed $120,000 under the DDTL on April 1, 2008, at
which time the commitment for the remaining $20,000 that was originally available under the DDTL
expired. Other borrowings under the
credit facility were used to retire the Companys previous $464,000 credit facility and to
fund the acquisition of North Pittsburgh. Borrowings under the credit facility are the Companys
senior, secured obligations that are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company and
its subsidiaries with the exception of Illinois Consolidated Telephone Company. The term loan and
DDTL have no interim principal maturities and thus mature in full on December 31, 2014. The
revolving credit facility matures on December 31, 2013.
At the Companys election, all borrowings under the credit facilities bear interest at a rate
equal to an applicable margin plus either a base rate or LIBOR. The applicable margin is based
upon the Companys total leverage ratio. As of June 30, 2008, the applicable margin for interest
rates was 2.50% on LIBOR based term loan and revolving credit facility borrowings. The applicable
margin for alternative base rate loans was 1.50% per year for the term loan facility and for the
revolving credit facility. At June 30, 2008 and 2007, the weighted average rate of interest on the
Companys credit facilities, including the effect of interest rate swaps, was 6.86% and 6.33% per
annum, respectively. Interest is payable at least quarterly.
The credit agreement contains various provisions and covenants, which include, among other
items, restrictions on the ability to pay dividends, incur additional indebtedness, and issue
capital stock, as well as limitations on future capital expenditures. The Company has also agreed
to maintain certain financial ratios, including interest coverage and total net leverage ratios,
all as defined in the credit agreement. As of June 30, 2008, the Company was in compliance with
the credit agreement covenants.
On April 1, 2008, the Company redeemed all of the outstanding senior notes. The total amount
of the redemption was $136,337 including a call premium of $6,337. The senior note redemption and
payment of accrued interest through the redemption date was funded using $120,000 of borrowings on
the DDTL together with cash on hand. The Company recognized a loss on extinguishment of debt of
$9,224 related to the redemption premium and the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs.
This loss has been included as a component of Other income (expense) in the accompanying
statements of income.
10. Derivative Instruments
The Company maintains interest rate swap agreements that are accounted for as cash flow
hedges and effectively convert a portion of its floating-rate debt to a fixed-rate basis, thus
reducing the impact of interest rate changes on future interest expense. At June 30, 2008, the
Company had interest rate swap agreements covering $790,000 in aggregate principal amount of its
variable rate debt at fixed LIBOR rates ranging from 3.8% to 5.5%. The swap agreements expire in
various amounts and on various dates from December 31, 2008 to March 31, 2013.
The fair value of the Companys derivative instruments, comprised solely of its interest rate
swaps, amounted to liabilities of $12,575 and $12,769 at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively. The fair value is included in Other Assets and Other Liabilities in the accompanying
Balance Sheets. The change in the fair value of derivative instruments, net of related tax effect,
is recorded in Other Comprehensive Income. The Company recognized comprehensive income of $13,342
and $3,335 during the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively and $122 and $1,853
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
12
11. Fair Value Measurements
In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. SFAS No. 157
defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Company has
adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 157 as of January 1, 2008, for financial instruments that are
required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. Although the adoption of SFAS No. 157
did not materially impact the results of operations or financial condition, the Company is now
required to provide additional disclosures as part of its financial statements.
SFAS No. 157 establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used
in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted
prices in active markets; Level 2, defined as inputs other than quoted prices in active markets
that are either directly or indirectly observable; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs in
which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own
assumptions.
As of June 30, 2008, the Companys derivative instruments related to interest rate swap
agreements are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The fair values of the
interest rate swaps are determined using an internal valuation model which relies on the expected
LIBOR based yield curve and estimates of counterparty and the Companys non performance risk as the
most significant inputs. Certain material inputs to the valuations are not directly observable and
cannot be corroborated by observable market data. The Company has categorized these interest rate
derivatives as Level 3.
The Companys net liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis subject to
disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 157 at June 30, 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Active |
|
|
Other |
|
|
Significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Markets for |
|
|
Observable |
|
|
Unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Identical Assets |
|
|
Inputs |
|
|
Inputs |
|
Description |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Derivatives |
|
$ |
12,575 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the Companys net liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring
basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as defined in SFAS No. 157 at June 30, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
Using Significant |
|
|
|
Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3) |
|
|
|
Interest Rate |
|
|
|
Derivatives |
|
Balance at December 31, 2007 |
|
$ |
12,769 |
|
Total unrealized gains included in other
comprehensive income |
|
|
(194 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
12,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of total gains or (losses) for
the period included in earnings for
the period |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
12. Restricted Share Plan
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity:
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted shares outstanding, December 31, 2007 |
|
|
129,302 |
|
Shares granted |
|
|
71,467 |
|
Shares vested |
|
|
(4,500 |
) |
Shares forfeited or retired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted shares outstanding, June 30, 2008 |
|
|
196,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recognized non-cash compensation expense associated with the restricted
shares totaling $476 and $972 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively and
$860 and $1,706 for
the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The shares granted in the six months
ended June 30, 2008 includes 14,750 restricted shares granted to certain key employees and
directors as well as 56,717 performance based restricted shares. The performance based restricted
shares were granted to key employees based upon the Company achieving certain financial and
operating targets for 2007 based on a sliding scale. In March 2008, a target of 64,447 performance
based restricted shares was approved for issuance in the first quarter of 2009 based upon meeting
operational and financial goals in 2008. The non-cash compensation expense is included in
Selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying statements of income.
13. Income Taxes
The Company adopted
Financial Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes, an Interpretation of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement
No. 109 (FIN
48), effective January 1, 2007, with no impact on its results of operations or financial
condition. During the six months ended June 30, 2008, there was a decrease of $42 to the balance
of unrecognized tax benefits reported at December 31, 2007 due to the expiration of state statute
of limitations. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the amount of unrecognized tax benefits
was $5,988 and $6,030, respectively. The total amount of unrecognized benefits that, if
recognized, would affect the effective tax rate is $236. An additional decrease in unrecognized
tax benefits of $520 and $238 of related accrued interest and penalties is expected in the
remainder of 2008 due to the expiration of federal and state statutes of limitations. The tax
benefit attributable to $236 of the decrease in unrecognizable tax benefits will result in a
reduction to the Companys effective tax rate and $284 will have no effect on the effective tax
rate. The Company is continuing its practice of recognizing interest and penalties related to
income tax matters in interest expense and general and administrative expense, respectively. Upon
adoption of FIN 48 the Company had no accrual balance for interest and penalties. For the quarter
ended June 30, 2008, the Company had accrued $658 of interest and penalties of which $272 was
recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and $65 was recorded during the six months ended
June 30, 2007. The only periods subject to examination for the Companys federal return are the
2003 through 2006 tax years. The periods subject to examination for the Companys state returns
are years 2003 through 2006. The Company is currently under examination by both federal and state
tax authorities. The Company does not expect that any settlement or payment that may result from
the audits will have a material effect on the Companys results of operations or cash flows. The
Company does not anticipate that the total unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change due
to the settlement of audits and the expiration of statute of limitations in the next twelve months.
There were no material changes to any of these amounts during the second quarter of 2008.
The Companys effective tax rate was 44.7% and 31.9%, for the six months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007, respectively. The effective tax rate differs from the federal and state statutory rates
primarily due to non-deductible expenses.
The Companys effective tax rate was 60.0% and 16.1%, for the three months ended June 30, 2008
and 2007, respectively. The effective tax rate differs from the federal and state statutory rates
primarily due to non-deductible expenses. The higher rate for the three months ended June 30, 2008
was due to the impact of applying a higher effective rate to the six months ended June 30, 2008.
The adjustment for the increased annual effective rate was recorded in the three months ended June 30,
2008, resulting in a higher effective tax rate for the quarter.
During the second quarter of 2007, the State of Texas amended the tax legislation enacted
during the second quarter of 2006. The most significant impact of this amendment on the Company
was the revision to the temporary credit on taxable margin. This new legislation resulted in a
reduction of our net deferred tax liabilities and corresponding credit to our tax provision of
approximately $1.7 million. Exclusive of this adjustment, the effective tax rate would have been
approximately 42.5% and 43.6% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007, respectively.
14
14. Net Income per Common Share
The following table sets forth the computation of net income per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Basic: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
5,493 |
|
|
$ |
3,889 |
|
|
$ |
10,112 |
|
Weighted average number of
common
shares outstanding |
|
|
29,315,250 |
|
|
|
25,758,289 |
|
|
|
29,314,881 |
|
|
|
25,757,471 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
5,493 |
|
|
$ |
3,889 |
|
|
$ |
10,112 |
|
Weighted average number of
common
shares outstanding |
|
|
29,529,290 |
|
|
|
26,130,618 |
|
|
|
29,514,570 |
|
|
|
26,080,203 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share |
|
$ |
0.01 |
|
|
$ |
0.21 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested shares issued pursuant to the Restricted Share Plan (see Note 12) were considered
outstanding for the computation of diluted net income per share as the recipients are entitled to
dividends and voting rights.
In accordance with SFAS No. 128, Earnings per Share, 17,968 contingent performance based
shares were included in the weighted average diluted shares based on the Companys results through
the six months ended June 30, 2008.
15. Comprehensive Income
The following table presents the components of comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
180 |
|
|
$ |
5,493 |
|
|
$ |
3,889 |
|
|
$ |
10,112 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost and net loss, net of tax |
|
|
(90 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(180 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value of cash flow hedges,
net of tax |
|
|
13,342 |
|
|
|
3,335 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
1,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income |
|
$ |
13,432 |
|
|
$ |
8,828 |
|
|
$ |
3,831 |
|
|
$ |
11,965 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
16. Business Segments
The Company is viewed and managed as two separate, but highly integrated, reportable business
segments, Telephone Operations and Other Operations. Telephone Operations consists of a wide
range of telecommunications services, including local and long distance service, VOIP service,
custom calling features, private line services, dial-up and high speed Internet access, digital TV,
carrier access services, network capacity services over our regional fiber optic network, and
directory publishing. The Company also operates a number of complementary businesses that comprise
Other Operations, including telemarketing and order fulfillment, telephone services to county
jails and state prisons, equipment sales, operator services, and mobile services. Management
evaluates the performance of these business segments based upon revenue, gross margins, and net
operating income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Operating revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone Operations |
|
$ |
95,637 |
|
|
$ |
71,006 |
|
|
$ |
190,611 |
|
|
$ |
143,518 |
|
Other Operations |
|
|
10,807 |
|
|
|
9,938 |
|
|
|
21,247 |
|
|
|
20,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
106,444 |
|
|
$ |
80,944 |
|
|
$ |
211,858 |
|
|
$ |
163,924 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone Operations |
|
$ |
20,746 |
|
|
$ |
17,020 |
|
|
$ |
41,600 |
|
|
$ |
36,238 |
|
Other Operations |
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(1,561 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
21,075 |
|
|
|
16,254 |
|
|
|
41,611 |
|
|
|
34,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
441 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(16,048 |
) |
|
|
(11,688 |
) |
|
|
(34,326 |
) |
|
|
(23,302 |
) |
Investment income |
|
|
4,845 |
|
|
|
1,611 |
|
|
|
9,207 |
|
|
|
3,054 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
(405 |
) |
|
|
(290 |
) |
Loss on extinguishment of
debt |
|
|
(9,224 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,224 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other, net |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
(114 |
) |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
$ |
450 |
|
|
$ |
6,550 |
|
|
$ |
7,037 |
|
|
$ |
14,856 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
We present below Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations (MD&A) of Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc. and its subsidiaries on a
consolidated basis. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our historical
financial statements and related notes contained elsewhere in this Report.
Consolidated Communications or the Company refers to Consolidated Communications Holdings,
Inc. alone or with its wholly owned subsidiaries, as the context requires. When this report uses
the words we, our, or us, they refer to the Company and its subsidiaries.
Forward-Looking Statements
Any statements
contained in this Report that are not statements of historical fact, including
statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements and should be
evaluated as such. The words anticipates, believes, expects,
intends, plans, estimates,
targets, projects, should, may, will
and similar words and expressions are intended to
identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are contained throughout
this Report, including, but not limited to, statements found in this Part I
Item 2
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, Part I
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk and Part II Item 1 Legal
Proceedings. Such forward-looking statements reflect, among other things, our current
expectations, plans, strategies, and anticipated financial results and involve a number of known
and unknown risks, uncertainties, and factors that may cause our actual results to differ
materially from those expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements, including but not
limited to:
|
|
|
various risks to stockholders of not receiving dividends and risks to our ability to
pursue growth opportunities if we continue to pay dividends according to our current
dividend policy; |
|
|
|
various risks to the price and volatility of our common stock; |
|
|
|
our substantial amount of debt and our ability to incur additional debt in the future; |
|
|
|
our need for a significant amount of cash to service and repay our debt and to pay
dividends on our common stock; |
|
|
|
restrictions contained in our debt agreements that limit the discretion of our
management in operating our business; |
|
|
|
the ability to refinance our existing debt as necessary; |
|
|
|
rapid development and introduction of new technologies and intense competition in the
telecommunications industry; |
|
|
|
risks associated with our possible pursuit of future acquisitions; |
|
|
|
the integration of the Company and North Pittsburgh; |
|
|
|
economic conditions in our service areas in Illinois, Texas and Pennsylvania; |
|
|
|
loss of large customers or government contracts; |
|
|
|
risks associated with the rights-of-way for our network; |
|
|
|
disruptions in our relationship with third party vendors; |
|
|
|
loss of key management personnel and the inability to attract and retain highly
qualified management and personnel in the future; |
17
|
|
|
changes in the extensive governmental legislation and regulations governing
telecommunications providers and the provision of telecommunications services and
subsidies; |
|
|
|
telecommunications carriers disputing and/or avoiding their obligations to pay network
access charges for use of our network; |
|
|
|
high costs of regulatory compliance; |
|
|
|
the competitive impact of legislation and regulatory changes in the telecommunications
industry; |
|
|
|
liability and compliance costs regarding environmental regulations; and |
|
|
|
the additional risk factors outlined in Part I Item 1A Risk Factors incorporated
by reference from our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2007, and the other documents that we file with the SEC from time to time that could cause
our actual results to differ from our current expectations and from the forward-looking
statements discussed in this Report. |
Many of these risks are beyond our ability to control or predict. All forward-looking
statements attributable to us or persons acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their
entirety by the cautionary statements contained throughout this Report. Because of these risks,
uncertainties, and assumptions, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements. Furthermore, forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made.
Except as required under the federal securities laws or the rules and regulations of the SEC, we do
not undertake any obligation to update or review any forward-looking information, whether as a
result of new information, future events or otherwise.
Overview
We are an established rural local exchange company that provides communications services to
residential and business customers in Illinois, Texas and Pennsylvania. Our main sources of
revenues are our local telephone businesses which offer an array of services, including local dial
tone, Voice Over Internet Protocol (VOIP) service, custom calling features, private line
services, long distance, dial-up and high-speed Internet access, which we refer to as Digital
Subscriber Line or DSL, inside wiring service and maintenance, carrier access, billing and
collection services, telephone directory publishing, Internet Protocol digital video service, which
we refer to as IPTV, wholesale transport services on a fiber optic network in Texas and edge out
Competitive Local Exchange Carrier (CLEC) services in Pennsylvania. We also operate a number of
complementary businesses, which offer telephone services to county jails and state prisons,
operator services, equipment sales and telemarketing and order fulfillment services.
Acquisition of North Pittsburgh and New Credit Facility
On December 31, 2007, we completed our acquisition of North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc., pursuant
to an Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 1, 2007. At the effective time of the Merger,
80% of the shares of North Pittsburgh common stock converted into the right to receive $25.00 in
cash, without interest, per share, for an approximate total of $300.1 million in cash, and each of
the remaining shares of North Pittsburgh common stock converted into the right to receive 1.1061947
shares of our common stock or an approximate total of 3.32 million shares of our common stock. The
total purchase price, including fees, was $346.8 million, net of cash acquired.
In connection with the acquisition, we entered into a new credit facility that provides for:
|
|
|
a $50.0 million revolving credit facility that is currently undrawn; |
|
|
|
a $760.0 million term loan, the proceeds of which were drawn at closing of the
acquisition; and |
|
|
|
a delayed draw term loan (DDTL) in the amount of up to $140.0 million which was
available to us until May 1, 2008, a portion of the proceeds of which were used for the
purpose of redeeming
our $130.0 million of outstanding senior notes along with the payment of any accrued
interest and fees, as described below under Redemption of Senior Notes. |
18
Proceeds from the term loan along with cash on hand were used to:
|
|
|
pay off our previous credit facility of $464.0 million plus accrued interest; |
|
|
|
fund the cash portion of the acquisition; and |
|
|
|
pay fees and expenses related to the acquisition and new financing. |
Redemption of Senior Notes
On April 1, 2008, we redeemed all of our outstanding senior notes. The total amount of the
redemption was $136.3 million including a call premium of $6.3 million. The senior note redemption
and the payment of accrued interest through the redemption date was funded using $120.0 million of
borrowings on the DDTL together with cash on hand. In the second quarter of 2008, we recognized a
charge of $9.2 million related to the redemption premium and the write-off of unamortized deferred
financing costs in connection with the redemption.
Factors Affecting Results of Operations
Revenues
Telephone Operations and Other Operations. To date, our revenues have been derived primarily
from the sale of voice and data communications services to residential and business customers in
our rural telephone companies service areas. We do not anticipate significant growth in revenues
in our Telephone Operations segment due to its primarily rural service area, except through
acquisitions such as that of North Pittsburgh, but we do expect relatively consistent cash flow
from year-to-year due to stable customer demand, limited competition in the majority of our
territories and a generally supportive regulatory environment.
Local Access Lines and Bundled Services. Local access lines are an important element of our
business. An access line is the telephone line connecting a persons home or business to the
public switched telephone network. The monthly recurring revenue we generate from end users, the
amount of traffic on our network and related access charges generated from other carriers, the
amount of federal and state subsidies we receive and most other revenue streams are directly
related to the number of local access lines in service. We had 276,793 and 286,186 local access
lines in service as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, and 229,007 at June 30, 2007, prior to
our acquisition of North Pittsburgh.
Many rural telephone companies have experienced a loss of local access lines due to
challenging economic conditions, increased competition from wireless providers, competitive local
exchange carriers and, in some cases, cable television operators. We have not been immune to these
conditions. Both Suddenlink and Comcast, cable competitors in Texas, have launched a competing
voice product in the second quarter, which caused a spike in our line loss for the quarter. In our
estimation, cable companies are now virtually 100% launched covering 85% of our territory.
We also lost local access lines due both to the disconnection of second telephone lines by our
residential customers in connection with their substituting DSL or cable modem service for dial-up
Internet access and to substituting wireless service for wireline service. As of June 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007 we had 9,847 and 10,685 second lines, respectively, and we had 7,357 second lines
prior to our acquisition of North Pittsburgh. The disconnection of second lines represented 9.9%
and 10.8% of our residential line loss in the periods ending June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007,
respectively. We expect to continue to experience modest erosion in access lines.
19
We have mitigated the decline in local access lines with increased average revenue per access
line by focusing on the following:
|
|
|
aggressively promoting DSL service, including selling DSL as a stand-alone service; |
|
|
|
bundling value-adding services, such as DSL or IPTV, with a combination of local
service, custom calling features, voicemail and Internet access; |
|
|
|
maintaining excellent customer service standards, particularly as we introduce new
services to existing customers; and |
|
|
|
keeping a strong local presence in the communities we serve. |
We have implemented a number of initiatives to gain new local access lines and retain existing
local access lines by enhancing the attractiveness of the bundle with new service offerings,
including unlimited long distance, and promotional offers like discounted second lines. With the
launch of IPTV, we are marketing our triple play bundle, which includes local telephone service,
DSL and IPTV. As of June 30, 2008, IPTV was available to approximately 130,000 homes in our
markets. Our IPTV subscriber base has grown from 9,577 as of June 30, 2007 to 14,112 as of June
30, 2008. We launched IPTV in our Pennsylvania markets in April 2008. In addition to our access
line and video initiatives, we intend to continue to integrate best practices across our Illinois,
Texas and Pennsylvania regions.
Additionally, we continue to look for ways to enhance current products and introduce new
services to ensure that we remain competitive and continue to meet our customers needs. These
initiatives include offering:
|
|
|
hosted VOIP, which was launched in certain Texas markets in 2005 to meet the
needs of small to medium sized business customers who want robust function without
having to purchase a traditional key or PBX phone system; |
|
|
|
VOIP service for residential customers, which is being offered both as a growth
opportunity and as an alternative to the traditional phone line for customers who
are considering a switch to a cable competitor; |
|
|
|
DSL service which has been made available to users who do not have our access
line. This expands our customer base and creates additional revenue generating
opportunities; |
|
|
|
a DSL tier with speeds up to 10 Mbps is now being offered for those customers
desiring greater Internet speed; and |
|
|
|
High definition video service and digital video recorders in
all of our IPTV markets. |
These efforts may act to mitigate the financial impact of any access line loss we may
experience.
Because of our promotional efforts and through the acquisition of North Pittsburgh, the number
of DSL subscribers we serve grew substantially. We had 86,575, 81,337 and 58,225 DSL lines in
service as of June 30, 2008, December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2007, respectively. Currently over 95%
of our rural telephone companies local access lines are DSL capable.
We have also utilized service bundles, which included combinations of local service, custom
calling features, voicemail and Internet access as a revenue generation tool and a customer
retention tool in our Illinois and Texas markets. Our service bundles totaled 45,272, 45,971 and
45,209 at June 30, 2008, December 31, 2007 and June 30, 2007, respectively. We intend to implement
a similar bundling strategy in the North Pittsburgh market as well.
20
Our plan is to continue to execute our customer retention program by delivering excellent
customer service and improving the value of our bundle with DSL and IPTV. However, if these
actions fail to mitigate access line loss, or we experience a higher degree of access line loss
than we currently expect, it could have an adverse impact on our revenues and earnings.
The following sets forth several key metrics as of the end of the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 (1) |
|
|
2007 |
|
Local access lines in service: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential |
|
|
174,641 |
|
|
|
183,070 |
|
|
|
151,645 |
|
Business |
|
|
102,152 |
|
|
|
103,116 |
|
|
|
77,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total local access lines |
|
|
276,793 |
|
|
|
286,186 |
|
|
|
229,007 |
|
|
IPTV subscribers |
|
|
14,112 |
|
|
|
12,241 |
|
|
|
9,577 |
|
ILEC DSL subscribers |
|
|
86,575 |
|
|
|
81,337 |
|
|
|
58,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,687 |
|
|
|
93,578 |
|
|
|
67,802 |
|
VOIP subscribers |
|
|
4,088 |
|
|
|
2,465 |
|
|
|
1,822 |
|
CLEC Access Line Equivalents (2) |
|
|
73,713 |
|
|
|
70,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total connections |
|
|
455,281 |
|
|
|
452,292 |
|
|
|
298,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long distance lines (3) |
|
|
167,767 |
|
|
|
166,599 |
|
|
|
150,863 |
|
Dial-up subscribers |
|
|
5,687 |
|
|
|
6,783 |
|
|
|
10,223 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
In connection with the acquisition of North Pittsburgh, we acquired 36,411 residential access
lines, 25,988 business access lines, 14,713 DSL subscribers, 87 VOIP subscribers, 70,063 CLEC
access line equivalents and 18,223 long distance lines. |
|
(2) |
|
CLEC access line equivalents represent a combination of voice services and data circuits. The
calculations represent a conversion of data circuits to an access line basis.
Equivalents are calculated by converting data circuits (basic rate interface, primary rate
interface, DSL, DS-1, DS-3 and Ethernet) and SONET-based (optical) services (OC-3 and OC-48) to
the equivalent of an access line. |
|
(3) |
|
Reflects the inclusion of long distance service provided as part of our VOIP offering while
excluding CLEC long distance subscribers. |
As of December 31, 2007 and for the period ended June 30, 2008, our operating statistics
include metrics and results associated with our acquisition of North Pittsburgh. In addition, we
are now including VOIP lines and CLEC access line equivalents in its total connection count and
reflecting T-1 voice grade equivalents in its access line count for the Pennsylvania RLEC, which is
consistent with our methodology in Illinois and Texas and with industry norms.
Expenses
Our primary operating expenses consist of cost of services, selling, general and
administrative expenses and depreciation and amortization expenses.
Cost of Services and Products
Our cost of services includes the following:
|
|
|
operating expenses relating to plant costs, including those related to the network
and general support costs, central office switching and transmission costs and cable
and wire facilities; |
|
|
|
general plant costs, such as testing, provisioning, network, administration, power
and engineering; and |
|
|
|
the cost of transport and termination of long distance and private lines outside
our rural telephone companies service area. |
21
We have agreements with carriers to provide long distance transport and termination services.
These agreements contain various commitments and expire at various times. We believe we will meet
all of our commitments in these agreements and believe we will be able to procure services for
future periods. We are currently procuring services for future periods, and at this time, the
costs and related terms under which we will purchase long distance transport and termination
services have not been determined. We do not expect, however, any material adverse affects from
any changes in any new service contract.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Selling, general and administrative expenses include the following:
|
|
|
selling and marketing expenses; |
|
|
|
expenses associated with customer care; |
|
|
|
billing and other operating support systems; and |
|
|
|
corporate expenses, including professional service fees, and non-cash stock
compensation. |
Our Telephone Operations segment incurs selling, marketing and customer care expenses from its
customer service centers and commissioned sales representatives. Our customer service centers are
the primary sales channels for residential and business customers with one or two phone lines,
whereas commissioned sales representatives provide customized solutions to larger business
customers. In addition, we use customer retail centers for various communication needs, including
new telephone, Internet and IPTV purchases in Illinois and Texas.
Each of our Other Operations businesses primarily use an independent sales and marketing team
comprised of dedicated field sales account managers, management teams and service representatives
to execute our sales and marketing strategy.
We have operating support and back office systems that are used to enter, schedule, provision
and track customer orders, test services and interface with trouble management, inventory, billing,
collections and customer care service systems for the local access lines in our operations. We
have migrated most key business processes of our Illinois and Texas operations onto single,
company-wide systems and platforms. Our objective is to improve profitability by reducing
individual company costs through centralization, standardization and sharing of best practices. We
successfully completed the integration of our Illinois and Texas billing systems in the third
quarter of 2007. Upon closing of the acquisition we were able to immediately convert the North
Pittsburgh accounting and payroll functions to our existing systems and began integrating many
other functions to our systems. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007 we spent
$2.1 million and $0.5 million, respectively, on integration and restructuring expenses (which
included projects to integrate our support and back office systems).
Depreciation and Amortization Expenses
We recognize depreciation expenses for our regulated telephone plant using rates and lives
approved by the Illinois Commerce Commission, the Public Utility Commission of Texas and the
Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission. The provision for depreciation on nonregulated property
and equipment is recorded using the straight-line method based upon the following useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years |
|
Buildings |
|
|
15-35 |
|
Network and outside plant facilities |
|
|
5-30 |
|
Furniture, fixtures and equipment |
|
|
3-17 |
|
Capital leases |
|
|
11 |
|
22
Amortization expenses are recognized primarily for our intangible assets considered to have
finite useful lives on a straight-line basis based on the pattern over which we believe we will
derive value from our customer lists. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards, or SFAS, No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill and intangible assets
that have indefinite useful lives are not amortized but rather are tested at least annually for
impairment. Because trade names have been determined to have indefinite lives, they are not
amortized. Customer relationships are amortized over their useful life, at a weighted average life
of approximately 10 years.
The following summarizes our revenues and operating expenses on a consolidated basis for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
$ (millions) |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
$ (millions) |
|
|
Revenues |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local calling services |
|
$ |
26.5 |
|
|
|
24.9 |
% |
|
$ |
21.0 |
|
|
|
26.0 |
% |
Network access services |
|
|
24.6 |
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
|
|
17.5 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
Subsidies |
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
Long distance services |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Data and internet services |
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
Other services |
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Telephone Operations |
|
|
95.6 |
|
|
|
89.8 |
|
|
|
71.0 |
|
|
|
87.8 |
|
Other Operations |
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
12.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
106.5 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
80.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone Operations |
|
|
52.9 |
|
|
|
49.7 |
|
|
|
37.9 |
|
|
|
46.9 |
|
Other Operations |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
9.6 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
22.3 |
|
|
|
20.9 |
|
|
|
16.6 |
|
|
|
20.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
85.4 |
|
|
|
80.2 |
|
|
|
64.6 |
|
|
|
79.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
19.8 |
|
|
|
16.3 |
|
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(16.0 |
) |
|
|
(15.0 |
) |
|
|
(11.5 |
) |
|
|
(14.2 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(4.4 |
) |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(0.2 |
) |
|
|
(1.0 |
) |
|
|
(1.2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
|
$ |
5.5 |
|
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segments
In accordance with the reporting requirement of SFAS No. 131, Disclosure about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information, we have two reportable business segments, Telephone Operations
and Other Operations. The results of operations for North Pittsburgh are included in the Telephone
Operations segment for the periods following its acquisition on December 31, 2007. The results of
operations discussed below reflect our consolidated results.
23
Results of Operations
For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to June 30, 2007
Revenues
Our revenues increased by 31.6% or $25.6 million, to $106.5 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2008, from $80.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. Our discussion and
analysis of the components of the variance follows:
Telephone Operations Revenues
Local calling services revenues increased by 26.2% or $5.5 million, to $26.5 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $21.0 million for the same period in 2007. The
increase is primarily due to $6.8 million of incremental local calling revenue as a result of the
acquisition of North Pittsburgh. Without the effect of North Pittsburgh, local calling revenue
decreased by $1.3 million primarily due to a decline in local access lines as previously discussed
under Factors Affecting Results of Operations.
Network access services revenues increased by 40.6%, or $7.1 million, to $24.6 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $17.5 million for the same period in 2007. The
increase is primarily due to $7.6 million of incremental network access revenue as a result of the
acquisition of North Pittsburgh. Without the effect of North Pittsburgh, network access revenue
decreased by $0.5 million. The decrease in revenue is primarily the result of decreasing minutes
of use.
Subsidies revenues increased by 20.7%, or $2.3 million, to $13.4 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to $11.1 million for the same period in 2007. The increase is
primarily due to $1.9 million of incremental subsidy revenue as a result of the acquisition of
North Pittsburgh. Without the effect of North Pittsburgh, subsidy revenue increased by $0.4
million. The increase is primarily due to the impact of out of period settlements in our
interstate common line support fund.
Long distance services revenues increased by 75.0% or $2.7 million, to $6.3 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $3.6 million for the same period in 2007. The
increase is primarily due to $3.0 million of incremental long distance revenue as a result of the
acquisition of North Pittsburgh. Without the effect of North Pittsburgh, long distance revenue
decreased by $0.3 million as a result of a decline in billable minutes.
Data and Internet revenues increased by 67.0%, or $6.1 million, to $15.2 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $9.1 million for the same period in 2007. The increase is
primarily due to $4.0 million of incremental Data and Internet revenue as a result of the
acquisition of North Pittsburgh. Without the effect of North Pittsburgh, Data and Internet
revenues increased by $2.1 million due to an increase in DSL and IPTV subscribers.
Other Services revenues increased by 10.3%, or $0.9 million to $9.6 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $8.7 million during the same period in 2007. The
acquisition of North Pittsburgh resulted in $0.7 million of incremental other services revenue.
Without the effect of North Pittsburgh, other service revenues increased by $0.2 million due to
increased revenue from our directory publishing and transport operations.
Other Operations Revenue
Other Operations revenues increased by 10.1%, or $1.0 million, to $10.9 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $9.9 million for the same period in 2007. In 2007 our
telemarketing business expanded its call volume capacity. As a result of the expansion, revenue
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 increased by $0.8 million compared to the same period in
2007. In addition, revenues from equipment sales and installations increased by $0.4 million.
Offsetting this increase was a decline of $0.2 million in our operator services business as a
result of decreased call attempts.
24
Operating Expenses
Our operating expenses increased by 32.2% or $20.8 million, to $85.4 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $64.6 million for the same period 2007. Our discussion and
analysis of the components of the variance follows:
Telephone Operations Operating Expense
Operating expenses for Telephone Operations increased by 39.6%, or $15.0 million, to $52.9
million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $37.9 million for the same period in
2007. The increase is primarily due to an additional $14.6 million of incremental telephone
operations operating expenses as a result of the acquisition of North Pittsburgh. Without the
effect of North Pittsburgh, telephone operations operating expenses increased by $0.4 million
primarily due to increased salary and benefit costs.
Other Operations Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for Other Operations increased by 1.0% or $0.1 million, to $10.2 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $10.1 million for the same period in 2007. As
a result of the added call volume for our telemarketing business, operating expense increased by
$0.4 million. This was offset by a decline of $0.3 million primarily related to reductions in
salaries and benefits in our operator services business.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased by 34.3% or $5.7 million, to $22.3 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $16.6 million for the same period in 2007.
The increase is primarily the result of the acquisition of North Pittsburgh. In connection with
the acquisition, we acquired property, plant and equipment valued at $117.1 million which caused an
increase in depreciation expense. In addition, we allocated $49.0 million of the purchase price to
customer lists which are being amortized over five years.
Non-Operating Income (Expense)
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net of interest income, increased by 39.1% or $4.5 million, to $16.0 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $11.5 million for the same period in 2007.
The increase is primarily due to an increase of $296.0 million in our long-term debt as a result of
the acquisition of North Pittsburgh.
Other Income (Expense)
Other income (expense), net decreased by 376.5% or $6.4 million, to a net expense of $4.7
million for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to income of $1.7 million for the same
period in 2007. In connection with the redemption of our senior notes, we recognized a loss on
extinguishment of debt of $9.2 million, which included a redemption premium of $6.3 million and the
write off of unamortized deferred financing costs of $2.9 million. As part of the acquisition of
North Pittsburgh, we acquired interests in three additional cellular partnerships, which
contributed $2.9 million of income during the period, partially offsetting the loss.
25
Income Taxes
Our provision for income taxes was $0.2 million in 2008 compared to $1.0 million in 2007. Our
effective tax rate was 60.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to 16.1% for the
three months
ended June 30, 2007. During the second quarter of 2007, the State of Texas amended the tax
legislation enacted during the second quarter of 2006. The most significant impact of this
amendment on the Company was the revision to the temporary credit on taxable margin. This new
legislation resulted in a reduction of our net deferred tax liabilities and corresponding credit to
our tax provision of approximately $1.7 million. Exclusive of these adjustments, our effective tax
rate would have been approximately 42.5% for the three months ended June 30, 2007. The higher rate
for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was due to the impact of applying a higher effective rate
to the six months ended June 30, 2008. The adjustment for the
increased annual effective rate was
recorded in the three months ended June 30, 2008, resulting in a higher effective tax rate for the
quarter. Our effective tax rate differs from the federal and state statutory rates primarily due
to non-deductible expenses.
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 Compared to June 30, 2007
The following summarizes our revenues and operating expenses on a consolidated basis for the
six months ended June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of Total |
|
|
|
$ (millions) |
|
|
Revenues |
|
|
$ (millions) |
|
|
Revenues |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local calling services |
|
$ |
53.5 |
|
|
|
25.2 |
% |
|
$ |
42.3 |
|
|
|
25.8 |
% |
Network access services |
|
|
49.1 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
|
|
35.8 |
|
|
|
21.9 |
|
Subsidies |
|
|
27.2 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
|
|
13.8 |
|
Long distance services |
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Data and internet services |
|
|
29.6 |
|
|
|
14.0 |
|
|
|
17.7 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
Other services |
|
|
18.7 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Telephone Operations |
|
|
190.6 |
|
|
|
89.9 |
|
|
|
143.5 |
|
|
|
87.6 |
|
Other Operations |
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating revenues |
|
|
211.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
163.9 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Telephone Operations |
|
|
104.5 |
|
|
|
49.3 |
|
|
|
75.3 |
|
|
|
45.9 |
|
Other Operations |
|
|
20.6 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
|
|
20.7 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
21.4 |
|
|
|
33.2 |
|
|
|
20.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
170.3 |
|
|
|
80.4 |
|
|
|
129.2 |
|
|
|
78.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
41.6 |
|
|
|
19.6 |
|
|
|
34.7 |
|
|
|
21.2 |
|
|
Interest expense, net |
|
|
(34.0 |
) |
|
|
(16.0 |
) |
|
|
(22.9 |
) |
|
|
(14.0 |
) |
Other income (expense), net |
|
|
(0.6 |
) |
|
|
(0.3 |
) |
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
(1.5 |
) |
|
|
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
% |
|
$ |
10.1 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26
Revenues
Our revenues increased by 29.3% or $48.0 million, to $211.9 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2008, from $163.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. Our discussion and
analysis of the components of the variance follows:
Telephone Operations Revenues
Local calling services revenues increased by 26.5% or $11.2 million, to $53.5 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $42.3 million for the same period in 2007. The increase
is primarily due to $13.9 million of incremental local calling revenue as a result of the
acquisition of North Pittsburgh. Without the effect of North Pittsburgh, local calling revenue
decreased by $2.7 million primarily due to a decline in local access lines as previously discussed
under Factors Affecting Results of Operations.
Network access services revenues increased by 37.2%, or $13.3 million, to $49.1 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $35.8 million for the same period in 2007. The
increase is primarily due to $15.2 million of incremental network access revenue as a result of the
acquisition of North Pittsburgh. Without the effect of North Pittsburgh, network access revenue
decreased by $1.9 million. In 2007 we recognized $0.7 million of non-recurring revenue as a result
of the favorable settlement of an outstanding billing claim. The remainder of the decrease in
revenue is a result of decreasing minutes of use.
Subsidies revenues increased by 19.8% or $4.5 million, to $27.2 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2008 compared to $22.7 million for the same period in 2007. The increase is
primarily due to $3.8 million of incremental subsidy revenue as a result of the acquisition of
North Pittsburgh. Without the effect of North Pittsburgh, subsidy revenue increased by $0.7
million due to an increase in the interstate common line revenue requirement as well as the impact
of out of period settlements in our interstate common line support fund in the second quarter of
2008 as described above.
Long distance services revenues increased by 73.6% or $5.3 million, to $12.5 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $7.2 million for the same period in 2007. The increase
is primarily due to $5.9 million of incremental long distance revenue as a result of the
acquisition of North Pittsburgh. Without the effect of North Pittsburgh, long distance revenue
decreased by $0.6 million as a result of a decline in billable minutes.
Data and Internet revenues increased by 67.2%, or $11.9 million, to $29.6 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $17.7 million for the same period in 2007. The increase is
primarily due to $8.0 million of incremental Data and Internet revenue as a result of the
acquisition of North Pittsburgh. Without the effect of North Pittsburgh, Data and Internet
revenues increased by $3.9 million due to an increase in DSL and IPTV subscribers.
Other Services revenues increased by 5.1%, or $0.9 million, to $18.7 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $17.8 million for the same period in 2007. The acquisition
of North Pittsburgh resulted in $1.1 million of incremental other services revenue. Without the
effect of North Pittsburgh, other service revenues decreased by $0.2 million due in part to the
recognition of $0.1 million of revenue from the settlement of a billing dispute in 2007 and a
decrease of $0.4 million in inside wiring revenue in 2008. These decreases were partially offset
by increased revenue from our directory publishing and transport businesses.
Other Operations Revenue
Other Operations revenues increased by 4.4%, or $0.9 million, to $21.3 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $20.4 million for the same period in 2007. In 2007 our
telemarketing business expanded its call volume capacity. As a result of the expansion, revenue
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 increased by $1.3 million compared to the same period in
2007. In addition, revenue from equipment sales and installation has increased by $0.4 million for
the period. Offsetting the increases was a decline of $0.5 million in our operator services
business as a result of decreased call attempts and lower revenues from mobile and paging services.
27
Operating Expenses
Our operating expenses increased by 31.8%, or $41.1 million, to $170.3 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $129.2 million for the same period in 2007. Our discussion
and analysis of the components of the variance follows:
Telephone Operations Operating Expense
Operating expenses for Telephone Operations increased by 38.8% or $29.2 million, to $104.5
million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $75.3 million for the same period in
2007. The increase is primarily due to an additional $28.9 million of incremental telephone
operations operating expenses as a result of the acquisition of North Pittsburgh.
Other Operations Operating Expenses
Operating expenses for Other Operations decreased by 0.5% or $0.1 million, to $20.6 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $20.7 million for the same period in 2007. As a
result of the added call volume for our telemarketing business, operating expense increased by $0.9
million. In addition, higher cost of sales and increased general and administrative expenses
caused an increase of $0.3 million in expenses for our prison system business. A decrease of $1.1
million primarily related to salaries and benefits reductions in our operator services business
offset these expenses.
Depreciation and Amortization
Depreciation and amortization expenses increased by 36.1%, or $12.0 million, to $45.2 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $33.2 million for the same period in 2007. The
increase is primarily the result of the acquisition of North Pittsburgh. In connection with the
acquisition, we acquired property, plant and equipment valued at $117.1 million which caused an
increase in depreciation expense. In addition, we allocated $49.0 million of the purchase price to
customer lists which are being amortized over five years.
Non-Operating Income (Expense)
Interest Expense, Net
Interest expense, net of interest income, increased by 48.5%, or $11.1 million, to $34.0
million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to $22.9 million for the same period in
2007. The increase is primarily due to an increase of $296.0 million in our long-term debt as a
result of the acquisition of North Pittsburgh.
Other Income (Expense)
Other income (expense), net decreased by 120.0%, or $3.6 million, to an expense of $0.6
million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to income of $3.0 million for the same
period in 2007. In connection with the redemption of our senior notes, we recognized a loss on
extinguishment of debt of $9.2 million, which included a redemption premium of $6.3 million and the
write off of unamortized deferred financing costs of $2.9 million. Partially offsetting this loss
was $5.8 million of income recognized from three additional cellular partnerships acquired as part
of the acquisition of North Pittsburgh.
Income Taxes
Our provision for income taxes was $3.1 million in 2008 compared to $4.7 million in 2007. Our
effective tax rate was 44.7% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to 31.9% for the six
months ended June 30, 2007. During the second quarter of 2007, the State of Texas amended the tax
legislation enacted during the second quarter of 2006. The most significant impact of this
amendment on the
Company was the revision to the temporary credit on taxable margin. This new legislation
resulted in a reduction of our net deferred tax liabilities and corresponding credit to our tax
provision of approximately $1.7 million. Exclusive of these adjustments, our effective tax rate
would have been approximately 43.6% for the six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to 44.7% for
the six months ended June 30, 2008. Our effective tax rate differs from the federal and state
statutory rates primarily due to non-deductible expenses.
28
Liquidity and Capital Resources
General
Historically, our operating requirements have been funded from cash flow generated from our
business and borrowings under our credit facilities. As of June 30, 2008, we had $882.2 million of
debt, including capital leases. Our $50.0 million revolving line of credit, however, remains
unused. On April 1, 2008 we redeemed our $130.0 million of outstanding senior notes. The
redemption, including the payment of the redemption premium of $6.3 million, accrued interest
through the redemption date and the associated fees, was funded using $120.0 million of proceeds
from our DDTL facility and cash on hand. In the second quarter of 2008, we recognized a loss on
redemption of the senior notes of $9.2 million, which included the redemption premium and the write
off of unamortized deferred financing costs associated with the senior notes.
We expect that our future operating requirements will continue to be funded from cash flow
generated from our business and borrowings under our revolving credit facility. As a general
matter, we expect that our liquidity needs in 2008 will arise primarily from: (i) expected
dividend payments of $45.6 million, reflecting quarterly dividends at an annual rate of $1.5495 per
share; (ii) interest payments on our indebtedness of $64.0 million to $67.0 million; (iii) capital
expenditures of approximately $46.5 million to $48.0 million; (iv) cash income tax payments of
$12.0 million to $15.0 million; and (v) certain other costs. These expected liquidity needs are
presented in a format which is consistent with our prior disclosures and are a component of our
total expenses as summarized above under Factors Affecting Results of OperationsExpenses. In
addition, we may use cash and incur additional debt to fund selective acquisitions. However, our
ability to use cash may be limited by our other expected uses of cash, including our dividend
policy, and our ability to incur additional debt will be limited by our existing and future debt
agreements.
We believe that cash flow from operating activities, together with our existing cash and
borrowings available under our revolving credit facility, will be sufficient for approximately the
next twelve months to fund our currently anticipated uses of cash. After that, our ability to fund
these expected uses of cash and to comply with the financial covenants under our debt agreements
will depend on the results of future operations, performance and cash flow. Our ability to do so
will be subject to prevailing economic conditions and to financial, business, regulatory,
legislative and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.
We may be unable to access the cash flow of our subsidiaries since certain of our subsidiaries
are parties to credit or other borrowing agreements that restrict the payment of dividends or
making intercompany loans and investments, and those subsidiaries are likely to continue to be
subject to such restrictions and prohibitions for the foreseeable future. In addition, future
agreements that our subsidiaries may enter into governing the terms of indebtedness may restrict
our subsidiaries ability to pay dividends or advance cash in any other manner to us.
To the extent that our business plans or projections change or prove to be inaccurate, we may
require additional financing or require financing sooner than we currently anticipate. Sources of
additional financing may include commercial bank borrowings, other strategic debt financing, sales
of nonstrategic assets, vendor financing or the private or public sales of equity and debt
securities. We cannot assure you that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flow from
operations in the future, that anticipated revenue growth will be realized, or that future
borrowings or equity issuances will be available in amounts sufficient to provide adequate sources
of cash to fund our expected uses of cash. Failure to obtain adequate
financing, if necessary, could require us to significantly reduce our operations or level of
capital expenditures which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and the
results of operations.
29
The following table summarizes our sources and uses of cash for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Net Cash Provided by (Used for): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
42.2 |
|
|
$ |
37.1 |
|
Investing activities |
|
|
(26.3 |
) |
|
|
(27.3 |
) |
Financing activities |
|
|
(39.8 |
) |
|
|
(20.4 |
) |
Operating Activities
Net income adjusted for non-cash charges is our primary source of operating cash. For the six
months ended June 30, 2008, net income adjusted for non-cash charges generated $54.9 million of
operating cash. Many of our annual cash expenditures for accruals and prepayments were paid in the
first six months, including incentive bonus payments of $3.5 million, insurance payments of $2.4
million and property tax payments of $4.8 million. In addition, we paid $5.6 million for federal and
state income taxes. Changes in components of working capital, primarily accrued expenses, accounts
receivable and accounts payable, in the ordinary course of business accounted for the remainder of
the cash flow from operations.
For the six months ended June 30, 2007, net income adjusted for non-cash charges generated
$49.1 million of operating cash. Partially offsetting the cash generated was a decrease of $7.1
million in certain accruals such as property tax, income tax and incentive bonuses, which are
recognized throughout the year but were paid in the first six months of 2007. Similarly, the
timing of prepayments for insurance and certain directory costs used $1.9 million of cash, while
the timing of other miscellaneous working capital components resulted in a $3.0 million use of
cash.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities has traditionally been for capital expenditures and
acquisitions. For the six months ending June 30, 2008, we used $26.3 million for capital
expenditures, which is an increase of $9.6 million for the same period in 2007. The increase is
due to the acquisition of North Pittsburgh. Because our networks, including the North Pittsburgh
network, are modern and have been well maintained, we do not believe we will substantially increase
capital spending beyond current levels in the future. Any such increase would likely occur as a
result of a planned growth or expansion, if at all. We expect our capital expenditures for 2008
will be approximately $46.5 million to $48.0 million, which will be used primarily to maintain and
upgrade our network, central offices and other facilities and information technology for operating
support and other systems. In addition to our capital investments made in the first six months of
2007, we also invested $10.6 million in marketable securities in order to maximize the returns on
our excess cash. These securities were subsequently sold in the third quarter of 2007.
Financing Activities
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we borrowed $120.0 million under our Delayed Draw
Term Loan and used the proceeds along with cash on hand to retire $130.0 million of our outstanding
senior notes and to pay a redemption premium of $6.3 million. In addition we paid $22.7 million of
cash to our common stockholders in accordance with the dividend policy adopted by our board of
directors. For the same period in 2007 we paid $20.1 million in dividends. The increase is due to
the issuance of approximately 3.32 million shares of stock in connection with the North Pittsburgh
acquisition. For the year we expect to pay approximately $45.6 million of dividends. We also paid
$0.2 million of deferred financing fees in connection with finalizing our new credit facility,
while $0.5 million was used to pay obligations under capital leases for the six months ended June
30, 2008. In the same period during 2007 we paid $0.3 million in deferred financing costs to amend
our previous credit facility.
30
Debt
The following table summarizes our indebtedness as of June 30, 2008:
Debt and Capital Leases as of June 30, 2008
(In Millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Maturity Date |
|
|
Rate (1) |
|
Capital lease |
|
$ |
2.2 |
|
|
July 1, 2011 |
|
|
7.40 |
% |
Revolving credit
facility |
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2013 |
|
LIBOR + 2.50% |
Term loan |
|
|
880.0 |
|
|
December 31, 2014 |
|
LIBOR + 2.50% |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of June 30, 2008, the 90-day LIBOR rate in effect on our borrowings was 2.80%. |
Credit Facilities
Borrowings under our credit facilities are our senior, secured obligations that are secured by
substantially all of the assets of the borrowers (Consolidated Communications, Inc., Consolidated
Communications Acquisition Texas, Inc. and North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc.) and the guarantors (the
Company and each of the existing subsidiaries of Consolidated Communications, Inc., Consolidated
Communications Ventures, and North Pittsburgh Systems, Inc. other than ICTC, and certain future
subsidiaries). The credit agreement contains customary affirmative covenants, which require us and
our subsidiaries to furnish specified financial information to the lenders, comply with applicable
laws, maintain our properties and assets and maintain insurance on our properties, among others,
and contains customary negative covenants which restrict our and our subsidiaries ability to incur
additional debt and issue capital stock, create liens, repay other debt, sell assets, make
investments, loans, guarantees or advances, pay dividends, repurchase equity interests or make
other restricted payments, engage in affiliate transactions, make capital expenditures, engage in
mergers, acquisitions or consolidations, enter into sale-leaseback transactions, amend specified
documents, enter into agreements that restrict dividends from subsidiaries and change the business
we conduct. In addition, the credit agreement requires us to comply with specified financial
ratios that are summarized below under Covenant Compliance.
As of June 30, 2008, we had no borrowings under the revolving credit facility. Borrowings
under our credit facilities bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin plus, at the
borrowers election, either a base rate or LIBOR. As of June 30, 2008, the applicable margin for
interest rates was 2.50% per year for the LIBOR based term loan and the revolving credit facility.
The applicable margin for alternative base rate loans was 1.50% per year for the term loan and the
revolving credit facility. At June 30, 2008, the weighted average interest rate, including swaps,
on our credit facilities was 6.86% per annum.
On April 1, 2008 we redeemed all of our outstanding senior notes in part utilizing $120.0
million of borrowings under the DDTL. The ability to utilize the delayed draw term loan for
additional borrowings expired on May 1, 2008. The relevant terms of the DDTL are the same as our
term loan.
Derivative Instruments
As of June 30, 2008 we had $790.0 million of notional amount floating to fixed interest rate
swap agreements, including $130.0 million of notional amount floating to fixed rate swap agreements
that were effective on April 1, 2008, commensurate with the advance of our delayed draw term loan.
Approximately 89.8% of our floating rate term loans were fixed as of June 30, 2008. The swaps
expire at various times from December 31, 2008 through March 31, 2013 and have a weighted average
fixed rate of approximately 4.56%. The swaps are designated as cash flow hedges of our expected
future interest payments.
31
Covenant Compliance
In general our credit agreement restricts our ability to pay dividends to the amount of our
Available Cash accumulated after October 1, 2005, plus $23.7 million and minus the aggregate amount
of dividends paid after July 27, 2005. Available Cash for any period is defined in our credit
facility as Consolidated EBITDA (a) minus, to the extent not deducted in the determination of
Consolidated EBITDA, (i) non-cash dividend income for such period; (ii) consolidated interest
expense for such period net of amortization of debt issuance costs incurred (A) in connection with
or prior to the consummation of the acquisition of North Pittsburgh or (B) in connection with the
redemption of our senior notes; (iii) capital expenditures from internally generated funds; (iv)
cash income taxes for such period; (v) scheduled principal payments of Indebtedness, if any; (vi)
voluntary repayments of indebtedness, mandatory prepayments of term loans and net increases in
outstanding revolving loans during such period; (vii) the cash costs of any extraordinary or
unusual losses or charges; and (viii) all cash payments made on account of losses or charges
expensed prior to such period (b) plus, to the extent not included in Consolidated EBITDA, (i) cash
interest income; (ii) the cash amount realized in respect of extraordinary or unusual gains; and
(iii) net decreases in revolving loans. Based on the results of operations from October 1, 2005
through June 30, 2008, we would have been able to pay a dividend of $70.2 million under the credit
facility covenant. After giving effect to the dividend of $11.4 million which was declared in May
2008 but paid on August 1, 2008, we could pay a dividend of $58.8 million under the credit facility
covenant.
Under our credit agreement, if our total net leverage ratio (as such term is defined in the
credit agreement), as of the end of any fiscal quarter, is greater than 5.25:1.00, until December
31, 2008 and 5.10:1.00 thereafter, we will be required to suspend dividends on our common stock
unless otherwise permitted by an exception for dividends that may be paid from the portion of
proceeds of any sale of equity not used to make mandatory prepayments of loans and not used to fund
acquisitions, capital expenditures or make other investments. During any dividend suspension
period, we will be required to repay debt in an amount equal to 50.0% of any increase in available
cash (as such term is defined in our credit agreement) during such dividend suspension period,
among other things. In addition, we will not be permitted to pay dividends if an event of default
under the credit agreement has occurred and is continuing. Among other things, it will be an event
of default if our interest coverage ratio as of the end of any fiscal quarter is below 2.25:1.00.
As of June 30, 2008, we were in compliance with our debt covenants.
The description of the covenants above and of our credit agreement generally in this Report
are summaries only. They do not contain a full description, including definitions, of the
provisions summarized. As such, these summaries are qualified in their entirety by these
documents, which are filed as exhibits to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form
10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K.
Dividends
The cash required to fund dividend payments is in addition to our other expected cash needs,
both of which we expect to be funded with cash flow from operations. In addition, we expect we
will have sufficient availability under our revolving credit facility to fund dividend payments in
addition to any expected fluctuations in working capital and other cash needs, although we do not
intend to borrow under this facility to pay dividends.
We believe that our dividend policy will limit, but not preclude, our ability to grow. If we
continue paying dividends at the level currently anticipated under our dividend policy, we may not
retain a sufficient amount of cash, and may need to seek refinancing, to fund a material expansion
of our business,
including any significant acquisitions or to pursue growth opportunities requiring capital
expenditures significantly beyond our current expectations. In addition, because we expect a
significant portion of cash available will be distributed to holders of common stock under our
dividend policy, our ability to pursue any material expansion of our business will depend more than
it otherwise would on our ability to obtain third-party financing.
Surety Bonds
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into surety, performance, and similar bonds. As
of June 30, 2008, we had approximately $2.0 million of these bonds outstanding.
32
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, (FASB) issued Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 161 (SFAS No. 161), Disclosure about Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. SFAS No. 161 requires entities
that utilize derivative instruments to provide qualitative disclosures about their objectives and
strategies for using such instruments, as well as any details of credit-risk-related contingent
features contained within derivatives. SFAS No. 161 also requires entities to disclose additional
information about the amounts and location of derivatives located within the financial statements,
how the provisions of SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, have been applied, and the impact that hedges have on an
entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for
fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption encouraged.
We currently provide information about our hedging activities and use of derivatives in our
quarterly and annual filings with the SEC, including many of the disclosure requirements contained
within SFAS No. 161. We are currently evaluating the impact, if any, of adopting SFAS No. 161 on
our disclosures. SFAS No. 161 will have no impact on our future results of operations and
financial condition.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160 (SFAS
No. 160), Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an Amendment of ARB No.
51. SFAS No. 160 clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest
in a consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial
statements. It also requires consolidated net income to include the amounts attributable to both
the parent and the noncontrolling interest. We are required to adopt SFAS No. 160 on January 1,
2009 and are currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 160 on our future results of
operations and financial condition.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised
2007) (SFAS No. 141 (R)), Business Combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) retains the fundamental
requirements of the original pronouncement requiring that the purchase method be used for all
business combinations. SFAS No. 141(R) defines the acquirer as the entity that obtains control of
one or more businesses in the business combination, establishes the acquisition date as the date
that the acquirer achieves control and requires the acquirer to recognize the assets acquired,
liabilities assumed and any non-controlling interest at their fair values as of the acquisition
date. SFAS No. 141(R) also requires, among other things, that acquisition-related costs be
recognized separately from the acquisition. We are required to adopt SFAS No. 141(R) effective
January 1, 2009. SFAS No. 141 (R) will generally impact acquisitions made after the date of
adoption.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates on our long-term debt
obligations. We estimate our market risk using sensitivity analysis. Market risk is defined as
the potential change in the fair market value of a fixed-rate long-term debt obligation due to
hypothetical adverse change in interest rates and the potential change in interest expense on
variable rate long-term debt obligations due to a change in market interest rates. The fair value
on long-term debt obligations is determined based on discounted cash flow analysis, using the rates
and the maturities of these obligations compared to terms and
rates currently available in long-term debt markets. The potential change in interest expense is
determined by calculating the effect of the hypothetical rate increase on the portion of variable
rate debt that is not hedged through the interest rate swap agreements described below and assumes
no changes in our capital structure. As of June 30, 2008, approximately 89.8% of our long-term
debt obligations were variable rate obligations subject to interest rate swap agreements and
approximately 10.2% were variable rate obligations not subject to interest rate swap agreements.
As of June 30, 2008, we had $880.0 million of debt outstanding under our credit facilities.
Our exposure to fluctuations in interest rates was limited by interest rate swap agreements that
effectively converted a portion of our variable rate debt to a fixed-rate basis, thus reducing the
impact of interest rate changes on future interest expenses. On June 30, 2008, we had interest
rate swap agreements covering $790.0 million of aggregate principal amount of our variable rate
debt at fixed LIBOR rates ranging from 3.87% to 5.51% and expiring on various dates from December
31, 2008 through March 31, 2013. As of June 30, 2008, we had $90.0 million of variable rate debt
not covered by interest rate swap agreements. If market interest rates averaged 1.0% higher than
the average rates that prevailed from January 1, 2008 through June 30, 2008, interest expense would
have increased by approximately $0.5 million for the period. As of June 30, 2008, the fair value
of interest rate swap agreements amounted to a liability of $8.0 million, net of taxes.
33
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in our reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as
amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Any controls and
procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of
achieving the desired control objectives. Our management, with the participation of our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and
operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2008. Based upon that
evaluation and subject to the foregoing, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
concluded that the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures provided
reasonable assurance that the disclosure controls and procedures are effective to accomplish their
objectives. No change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) occurred during our fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2008 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
34
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On April 15, 2008, Salsgiver Inc., a Pennsylvania-based telecommunications company, and
certain of its affiliates filed a lawsuit against us and our subsidiaries North Pittsburgh
Telephone Company and North Pittsburgh Systems Inc. in the Court of Common Pleas of Allegheny
County, Pennsylvania, alleging that we have prevented Salsgiver from connecting its fiber optic
cables to North Pittsburghs utility poles. Salsgiver seeks compensatory and punitive damages as
the result of alleged lost projected profits, damage to its business reputation, and other costs.
It claims to have sustained losses of approximately $125 million, but does not request a specific
dollar amount in damages. We believe that these claims are without merit and, regardless of the
merit of the claims, the damages are completely unfounded. We intend to defend against these
claims vigorously.
In addition, we currently are, and from time to time may be, subject to additional claims
arising in the ordinary course of business. We are not currently subject to any such claims that
we believe could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on our results of
operations or financial condition.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
We held our Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 6, 2008, for the purpose of electing two
directors to hold office until our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and to ratify the
appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2008.
Proxies for the Annual Meeting were solicited pursuant to Regulation 14A; there was no solicitation
in opposition to our submissions as listed in the Proxy Statement. Robert J. Currey, nominee, was
elected Class III director with 27,135,561 votes for and 327,631 votes withheld. Maribeth S. Rahe,
nominee, was elected Class III director with 26,893,190 votes for and 570,002 votes withheld. The
other directors whose terms of office continued after the meeting are Roger H. Moore, Jack W.
Blumenstein, and Richard A. Lumpkin. Our stockholders also ratified the appointment of Ernst &
Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2008 with 27,359,503 votes for,
59,345 votes against, and 44,343 votes abstaining.
Item 5. Other Information
On April 1, 2008, the Company completed a redemption of all of its 9-3/4% Senior Notes due
2012, of which $130,000,000 in aggregate principal amount were outstanding. The redemption price
included the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the date of redemption and a
redemption premium equal to $6,337,500 (the Redemption Premium).
On
August 6, 2008, the Company, Consolidated Communications, Inc. (CCI),
Consolidated Communications Acquisition Texas, Inc. (CCI Texas) and North Pittsburgh
Systems, Inc. (formerly known as Fort Pitt Acquisition Sub Inc.) (together with CCI and CCI Texas,
the Borrowers) and Wachovia Bank, National Association (Wachovia), as
administrative agent, issuing bank and swingline lender under the Credit Agreement dated as of
December 31, 2007 (the Credit Agreement) by and among the Company, the Borrowers,
Wachovia, and the other parties thereto, entered into a letter agreement (the Letter
Agreement) whereby Wachovia, at the request of the other lenders under the Credit Agreement,
agreed that, to the extent deducted from Consolidated Net Income (as such term is defined in the
Credit Agreement), the Company and the Borrowers shall be permitted to add back the actual amount
of the Redemption Premium (not to exceed $6.4 million) to Consolidated EBITDA (as such term is
defined in the Credit Agreement) for the applicable fiscal period.
This description of the Letter Agreement is qualified in its entirety by the terms of the
Letter Agreement, which is filed as Exhibit 10.1 to this Form 10-Q and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Item 6. Exhibits
See the Exhibit Index following the signature page of this Report.
35
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: August 7, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ Robert J. Currey
|
|
|
|
Robert J. Currey |
|
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
Date: August 7, 2008 |
By: |
/s/ Steven L. Childers
|
|
|
|
Steven L. Childers |
|
|
|
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer and
Chief Accounting Officer) |
|
36
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Description |
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated
August 6, 2008, by Wachovia Bank, National Association, and agreed
to and acknowledged by Consolidated Communications Holdings, Inc., Consolidated
Communications, Inc., Consolidated Communications Acquisition Texas, Inc. and North Pittsburgh
Systems, Inc. (formerly known as Fort Pitt Acquisition Sub Inc.). |
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002. |
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
37