10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2008
|
|
Commission file number 1-5805 |
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
13-2624428 |
(State or other jurisdiction of
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization)
|
|
Identification No.) |
|
|
|
270 Park Avenue, New York, New York
|
|
10017 |
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code (212) 270-6000
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
þ Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
o Yes þ No
Number
of shares of common stock outstanding as of October 31, 2008:
3,732,357,534
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
(in millions, except per share, headcount and ratio data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
As of or for the period ended, |
|
3Q08 |
|
|
2Q08 |
|
|
1Q08 |
|
|
4Q07 |
|
|
3Q07 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
$ |
5,743 |
|
|
$ |
10,105 |
|
|
$ |
9,231 |
|
|
$ |
10,161 |
|
|
$ |
9,199 |
|
|
$ |
25,079 |
|
|
$ |
34,805 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
8,994 |
|
|
|
8,294 |
|
|
|
7,659 |
|
|
|
7,223 |
|
|
|
6,913 |
|
|
|
24,947 |
|
|
|
19,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
14,737 |
|
|
|
18,399 |
|
|
|
16,890 |
|
|
|
17,384 |
|
|
|
16,112 |
|
|
|
50,026 |
|
|
|
53,988 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
3,811 |
|
|
|
3,455 |
|
|
|
4,424 |
|
|
|
2,542 |
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
11,690 |
|
|
|
4,322 |
|
Provision for credit losses accounting
conformity(a) |
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
11,137 |
|
|
|
12,177 |
|
|
|
8,931 |
|
|
|
10,720 |
|
|
|
9,327 |
|
|
|
32,245 |
|
|
|
30,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax
expense and extraordinary gain |
|
|
(2,187 |
) |
|
|
2,767 |
|
|
|
3,535 |
|
|
|
4,122 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
4,115 |
|
|
|
18,683 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit)(b) |
|
|
(2,133 |
) |
|
|
764 |
|
|
|
1,162 |
|
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
6,289 |
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary
gain |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
2,003 |
|
|
|
2,373 |
|
|
|
2,971 |
|
|
|
3,373 |
|
|
|
4,322 |
|
|
|
12,394 |
|
Extraordinary gain(c) |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
527 |
|
|
$ |
2,003 |
|
|
$ |
2,373 |
|
|
$ |
2,971 |
|
|
$ |
3,373 |
|
|
$ |
4,903 |
|
|
$ |
12,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per common share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.56 |
|
|
$ |
0.70 |
|
|
$ |
0.88 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
$ |
3.63 |
|
Net income |
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
1.36 |
|
|
|
3.63 |
|
Diluted earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.54 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.86 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
|
$ |
3.52 |
|
Net income |
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.54 |
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
0.86 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
|
Cash dividends declared per share |
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
0.38 |
|
|
|
1.14 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
Book value per share |
|
|
36.95 |
|
|
|
37.02 |
|
|
|
36.94 |
|
|
|
36.59 |
|
|
|
35.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average: Basic |
|
|
3,445 |
|
|
|
3,426 |
|
|
|
3,396 |
|
|
|
3,367 |
|
|
|
3,376 |
|
|
|
3,422 |
|
|
|
3,416 |
|
Diluted |
|
|
3,445 |
(h) |
|
|
3,531 |
|
|
|
3,495 |
|
|
|
3,472 |
|
|
|
3,478 |
|
|
|
3,525 |
|
|
|
3,520 |
|
Common shares at period end |
|
|
3,727 |
|
|
|
3,436 |
|
|
|
3,401 |
|
|
|
3,367 |
|
|
|
3,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share price(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High |
|
$ |
49.00 |
|
|
$ |
49.95 |
|
|
$ |
49.29 |
|
|
$ |
48.02 |
|
|
$ |
50.48 |
|
|
$ |
49.95 |
|
|
$ |
53.25 |
|
Low |
|
|
29.24 |
|
|
|
33.96 |
|
|
|
36.01 |
|
|
|
40.15 |
|
|
|
42.16 |
|
|
|
29.24 |
|
|
|
42.16 |
|
Close |
|
|
46.70 |
|
|
|
34.31 |
|
|
|
42.95 |
|
|
|
43.65 |
|
|
|
45.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Market capitalization |
|
|
174,048 |
|
|
|
117,881 |
|
|
|
146,066 |
|
|
|
146,986 |
|
|
|
153,901 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on common equity (ROE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
Net income |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Return on assets (ROA) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
|
0.61 |
|
|
|
0.77 |
|
|
|
0.91 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
1.16 |
|
Net income |
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.48 |
|
|
|
0.61 |
|
|
|
0.77 |
|
|
|
0.91 |
|
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
1.16 |
|
Overhead ratio |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Tier 1 capital ratio |
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total capital ratio |
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
13.4 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tier 1 leverage ratio |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected balance sheet data
(period-end) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets |
|
$ |
520,257 |
|
|
|
$531,997 |
|
|
$ |
485,280 |
|
|
$ |
491,409 |
|
|
$ |
453,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
150,779 |
|
|
|
119,173 |
|
|
|
101,647 |
|
|
|
85,450 |
|
|
|
97,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
761,381 |
|
|
|
538,029 |
|
|
|
537,056 |
|
|
|
519,374 |
|
|
|
486,320 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
|
2,251,469 |
|
|
|
1,775,670 |
|
|
|
1,642,862 |
|
|
|
1,562,147 |
|
|
|
1,479,575 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
969,783 |
|
|
|
722,905 |
|
|
|
761,626 |
|
|
|
740,728 |
|
|
|
678,091 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
238,034 |
|
|
|
260,192 |
|
|
|
189,995 |
|
|
|
183,862 |
|
|
|
173,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stockholders equity |
|
|
137,691 |
|
|
|
127,176 |
|
|
|
125,627 |
|
|
|
123,221 |
|
|
|
119,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
145,843 |
|
|
|
133,176 |
|
|
|
125,627 |
|
|
|
123,221 |
|
|
|
119,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headcount |
|
|
228,452 |
|
|
|
195,594 |
|
|
|
182,166 |
|
|
|
180,667 |
|
|
|
179,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
(in millions, except per share, headcount and ratio data) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
As of or for the period ended, |
|
3Q08 |
|
|
2Q08 |
|
|
1Q08 |
|
|
4Q07 |
|
|
3Q07 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit quality metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for credit losses |
|
$ |
19,765 |
|
|
$ |
13,932 |
|
|
$ |
12,601 |
|
|
$ |
10,084 |
|
|
$ |
8,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets(e) |
|
|
9,520 |
|
|
|
6,233 |
|
|
|
5,143 |
|
|
|
3,933 |
|
|
|
3,009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to loans(f) |
|
|
2.86 |
% |
|
|
2.57 |
% |
|
|
2.29 |
% |
|
|
1.88 |
% |
|
|
1.76 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
charge-offs |
|
$ |
2,484 |
|
|
$ |
2,130 |
|
|
$ |
1,906 |
|
|
$ |
1,429 |
|
|
$ |
1,221 |
|
|
$ |
6,520 |
|
|
$ |
3,109 |
|
Net charge-off rate(g) |
|
|
1.91 |
% |
|
|
1.67 |
% |
|
|
1.53 |
% |
|
|
1.19 |
% |
|
|
1.07 |
% |
|
|
1.70 |
% |
|
|
0.94 |
% |
Wholesale net charge-off rate(g) |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
0.08 |
|
|
|
0.18 |
|
|
|
0.05 |
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
0.12 |
|
|
|
0.04 |
|
Consumer net charge-off rate(g) |
|
|
3.13 |
|
|
|
2.77 |
|
|
|
2.43 |
|
|
|
1.93 |
|
|
|
1.62 |
|
|
|
2.78 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
Managed Card net charge-off rate |
|
|
5.00 |
|
|
|
4.98 |
|
|
|
4.37 |
|
|
|
3.89 |
|
|
|
3.64 |
|
|
|
4.79 |
|
|
|
3.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The third quarter of 2008 included an accounting conformity loan loss reserve provision
related to the acquisition of Washington Mutual Banks banking operations. |
(b) |
|
The income tax benefit in the third quarter and year-to-date 2008 is predominantly the result
of reduced deferred tax liabilities on overseas earnings, as well as the tax benefit
associated with the conforming loan loss reserve provision related to the acquisition of
Washington Mutual Banks banking operations. |
(c) |
|
JPMorgan Chase acquired
the banking operations of Washington Mutual Bank for
$1.9 billion. The fair value of the net assets acquired exceeded the purchase price which resulted in negative goodwill. In accordance
with SFAS 141, nonfinancial assets that are not held-for-sale were written down against that
negative goodwill. The negative goodwill that remained after writing down nonfinancial assets
was recognized as an extraordinary gain. |
(d) |
|
JPMorgan Chases common stock is listed and traded on the New York Stock Exchange, the London
Stock Exchange and the Tokyo Stock Exchange. The high, low and closing prices of JPMorgan
Chases common stock are from the New York Stock Exchange Composite Transaction Tape. |
(e) |
|
Excludes purchased
held-for-sale loans and approximately $6.4 billion of consumer loans acquired
as part of the Washington Mutual Bank transaction that were nonperforming
prior to the transaction closing. The loans acquired
from Washington Mutual Bank are considered to be credit impaired and, therefore, are accounted for under SOP 03-3. For
additional information, see Note 13 on pages 120122 of this
Form 10-Q. |
(f) |
|
Loans accounted for at fair value, purchased credit impaired loans accounted for under SOP
03-3 and loans held-for-sale were excluded when calculating this metric. |
(g) |
|
Loans accounted for at
fair value and loans held-for-sale were excluded when calculating
these metrics. |
(h) |
|
Common equivalent shares have been excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per
share for the third quarter of 2008, as the effect on income (loss) before extraordinary gain
would be antidilutive. |
4
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This section of the Form 10-Q provides managements discussion and analysis (MD&A) of the
financial condition and results of operations for JPMorgan Chase. See the Glossary of Terms on
pages 156159 for definitions of terms used throughout this Form 10-Q. The MD&A included in this
Form 10-Q contains statements that are forward-looking within the meaning of the Private Securities
Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations
of JPMorgan Chases management and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. These risks
and uncertainties could cause JPMorgan Chases actual results to differ materially from those set
forth in such forward-looking statements. Certain of such risks and uncertainties are described
herein (see Forward-looking Statements on page 162 and Item 1A: Risk Factors on page 165 of this
Form 10-Q), as well as in the JPMorgan Chase Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2007 (2007 Annual Report or 2007 Form 10-K), including Part I, Item 1A: Risk factors, and
the JPMorgan Chase quarterly reports, on Forms 10-Q for the quarters ended June 30, 2008, and March
31, 2008, including Part II, Item 1A thereof, to which reference is hereby made.
INTRODUCTION
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPMorgan Chase or the Firm), a financial holding company incorporated
under Delaware law in 1968, is a leading global financial services firm and one of the largest
banking institutions in the United States of America (U.S.), with $2.3 trillion in assets, $145.8
billion in total stockholders equity and operations in more than 60 countries as of September 30,
2008. The Firm is a leader in investment banking, financial services for consumers and businesses,
financial transaction processing and asset management. Under the JPMorgan and Chase brands, the
Firm serves millions of customers in the U.S. and many of the worlds most prominent corporate,
institutional and government clients.
JPMorgan Chases principal bank subsidiaries are JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association
(JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.), a national banking association with branches in 24 states; and Chase
Bank USA, National Association (Chase Bank USA, N.A.), a national bank that is the Firms credit
card issuing bank. JPMorgan Chases principal nonbank subsidiaries are J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
and Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc. (Bear Stearns &
Co.), the Firms U.S. investment banking firms. The Firm merged J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. with and into Bear Stearns & Co. and changed the name
of the surviving corporation to J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
JPMorgan Chases activities are organized, for management reporting purposes, into six business
segments, as well as Corporate/Private Equity. The Firms wholesale businesses comprise the
Investment Bank, Commercial Banking, Treasury & Securities Services and Asset Management segments.
The Firms consumer businesses comprise the Retail Financial Services and Card Services segments. A
description of the Firms business segments, and the products and services they provide to their
respective client bases, follows. The description of the Firms
business segments below does not give effect to the acquisition of
the banking operations of Washington Mutual Bank (Washington Mutual), which was consummated on September 25, 2008. For a
discussion of the Washington Mutual transaction, see pages 6 and 4950 of this Form 10-Q.
Investment Bank
JPMorgan is one of the worlds leading investment banks, with deep client relationships and broad
product capabilities. The Investment Banks clients are corporations, financial institutions,
governments and institutional investors. The Firm offers a full range of investment banking
products and services in all major capital markets, including advising on corporate strategy and
structure, capital raising in equity and debt markets, sophisticated risk management, market-making
in cash securities and derivative instruments, prime brokerage and research. The Investment Bank
(IB) also commits the Firms own capital to proprietary investing and trading activities.
Retail Financial Services
Retail Financial Services (RFS), which includes the Regional Banking,
Mortgage Banking and Auto Finance reporting segments serves consumers and businesses through bank
branches, ATMs, online banking and telephone banking. Customers can use more than 3,100 bank
branches, 9,300 ATMs and 300 mortgage offices. More than 14,100 branch salespeople assist customers
with checking and savings accounts, mortgages, home equity and business loans and investments
across the 17-state footprint from New York to Arizona. Consumers also can obtain loans through
more than 14,200 auto dealerships and 3,500 schools and universities nationwide.
Card Services
With more than 156 million cards in circulation and more than $159 billion in managed
loans, Card Services (CS) is one of the nations largest credit card issuers. Customers used
Chase cards to meet more than $272 billion worth of their spending needs in the nine months ended
September 30, 2008.
5
With hundreds of partnerships, Chase has a market leadership position in building loyalty programs
with many of the worlds most respected brands.
Chase Paymentech Solutions, LLC, a joint venture between JPMorgan Chase and First Data Corporation,
is a processor of MasterCard and Visa payments and handled more than 16 billion transactions in the
nine months ended September 30, 2008. On May 27, 2008, the Firm announced the termination of Chase
Paymentech Solutions. For further information, see Other Business
Events on page 7 of this Form
10-Q.
Commercial Banking
Commercial Banking (CB) serves more than 30,000 clients nationally, including
corporations, municipalities, financial institutions and not-for-profit entities with annual
revenue generally ranging from approximately $10 million to approximately $2 billion. Commercial
Banking delivers extensive industry knowledge, local expertise and a dedicated service model. In
partnership with the Firms other businesses, it provides comprehensive solutions including
lending, treasury services, investment banking and asset management to meet its clients domestic
and international financial needs.
Treasury & Securities Services
Treasury & Securities Services (TSS) is a global leader in
transaction, investment and information services. TSS is one of the worlds largest cash management
providers and a leading global custodian. Treasury Services (TS) provides cash management, trade,
wholesale card and liquidity products and services to small and mid-sized companies, multinational
corporations, financial institutions and government entities. TS partners with the Commercial
Banking, Retail Financial Services and Asset Management businesses to serve clients firmwide. As a
result, certain TS revenue is included in other segments results. Worldwide Securities Services
(WSS) holds, values, clears and services securities, cash and alternative investments for
investors and broker-dealers, and manages depositary receipt programs globally.
Asset Management
With assets under supervision of $1.6 trillion as of September 30, 2008, Asset
Management (AM) is a global leader in investment and wealth management. AM clients include
institutions, retail investors and high-net-worth individuals in every major market throughout the
world. AM offers global investment management in equities, fixed income, real estate, hedge funds,
private equity and liquidity, including both money market instruments and bank deposits. AM also
provides trust and estate, banking and brokerage services to high-net-worth clients, and retirement
services for corporations and individuals. The majority of AMs client assets are in actively
managed portfolios.
OTHER BUSINESS EVENTS
Acquisition
of the banking operations of Washington Mutual Bank
On September 25, 2008, JPMorgan Chase acquired the banking
operations of Washington Mutual from the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (FDIC) for $1.9 billion through a
purchase of substantially all of the assets and assumption of
specified liabilities of Washington Mutual.
Washington Mutuals banking operations consisted of a retail bank network of 2,244 branches, a
nationwide credit card lending business, a multi-family and commercial real estate lending
business, and nationwide mortgage banking activities. The transaction
expands the Firms consumer branch network into California, Florida, Washington, Georgia, Idaho, Nevada and Oregon. The
transaction created the nations second-largest branch network. The transaction also extends the
reach of the Firms business banking, commercial banking, credit card, consumer lending and wealth
management businesses. The transaction was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in
accordance with SFAS 141. The results of operations of Washington Mutuals banking operations for
the period September 26, 2008, through September 30, 2008, did not have a material effect on the
results of the quarter ended September 30, 2008, except with
respect to the charge to conform Washington Mutuals
loan loss reserves and the extraordinary gain related to the
transaction, both of which are reflected for
JPMorgan Chase in the Corporate/Private Equity segment. Beginning October 1, 2008, the results of
operations of Washington Mutuals banking operations will be included in the Firms business
segments. For further discussion of the transaction, see Note 2 on pages 9398 of this Form 10-Q.
Merger with The Bear Stearns Companies Inc.
Effective May 30, 2008, BSC Merger Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase, merged
with The Bear Stearns Companies Inc. (Bear Stearns) pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of March 16, 2008, as amended March 24, 2008, with Bear Stearns becoming a wholly-owned
subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase (the Merger). The Merger provides the Firm with a leading global
prime brokerage platform; strengthens the Firms equities and asset management businesses; enhances
capabilities in mortgage origination, securitization and servicing; and expands the platform of the
Firms energy business. The Merger was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, which
requires that the assets and liabilities of Bear Stearns be fair valued. The total purchase price
to complete the Merger was $1.5 billion.
6
The Merger was accomplished through a series of transactions that were reflected as step
acquisitions in accordance with SFAS 141. On April 8, 2008, pursuant to the share exchange
agreement, JPMorgan Chase acquired 95 million newly issued shares of Bear Stearns common stock (or
39.5% of Bear Stearns common stock after giving effect to the issuance) for 21 million shares of
JPMorgan Chase common stock. Further, between March 24, 2008, and May 12, 2008, JPMorgan Chase
acquired approximately 24 million shares of Bear Stearns common stock in the open market at an
average purchase price of $12.37 per share. The share exchange and cash purchase transactions
resulted in JPMorgan Chase owning approximately 49.4% of Bear Stearns common stock immediately
prior to consummation of the Merger. Finally, on May 30, 2008, JPMorgan Chase completed the Merger,
and as a result of the Merger, each outstanding share of Bear Stearns common stock (other than
shares then held by JPMorgan Chase) was converted into the right to receive 0.21753 shares of
common stock of JPMorgan Chase. On May 30, 2008, the shares of common stock that JPMorgan Chase and
Bear Stearns acquired from each other in the share exchange transaction were cancelled. From April
8, 2008, through May 30, 2008, JPMorgan Chase accounted for its investment in Bear Stearns under
the equity method of accounting in accordance with APB 18. During this period, JPMorgan Chase
recorded reductions to its investment in Bear Stearns representing its share of Bear Stearns net
losses, which were recorded in other income and accumulated other comprehensive income. Commencing
May 31, 2008, Bear Stearns was reflected in JPMorgan Chases consolidated results of operations.
In conjunction with the Merger, in June 2008, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the FRBNY)
took control, through a limited liability company (LLC) formed for this purpose, of a portfolio
of $30 billion in assets acquired from Bear Stearns, based upon the value of the portfolio as of
March 14, 2008. The assets of the LLC were funded by a $28.85 billion term loan from the FRBNY, and
a $1.15 billion subordinated loan from JPMorgan Chase. The JPMorgan Chase loan is subordinated to
the FRBNY loan and will bear the first $1.15 billion of any losses of the portfolio. Any remaining
assets in the portfolio after repayment of the FRBNY loan, the
JPMorgan Chase loan and the expense of the LLC, will be for the account of the FRBNY.
For further discussion of the Merger, see Note 2 on pages 9398 of this Form 10-Q.
Termination of Chase Paymentech Solutions joint venture
The dissolution of Chase Paymentech Solutions, a global payments and merchant acquiring joint
venture between JPMorgan Chase and First Data Corporation, was completed on November 1, 2008 and
JPMorgan Chase retained approximately 51% of the business under the Chase Paymentech name.
The dissolution of Chase Paymentech Solutions is being accounted for as a step acquisition in
accordance with SFAS 141, and the Firm anticipates recognizing an after-tax gain of approximately $600
million in the fourth quarter of 2008 as a result of the dissolution. The gain will represent the amount by which the fair value of the net assets acquired (predominantly intangible
assets and goodwill) exceeded JPMorgan Chases book basis in the net assets transferred to First
Data Corporation.
Purchase of additional interest in Highbridge Capital Management
In January 2008, JPMorgan Chase purchased an additional equity interest in Highbridge Capital
Management, LLC (Highbridge). As a result, the Firm currently owns 77.5% of Highbridge. The Firm
acquired a majority interest in Highbridge in 2004.
RECENT MARKET DEVELOPMENTS
The liquidity crisis has evolved into a global credit and liquidity issue involving a number of
financial institutions, including the failures of some, in the U.S. and Europe. In response to
these circumstances, the United States government, particularly the U.S. Department of the Treasury
(the U.S. Treasury), the Board of Governors of the
Federal Reserve System (the Federal Reserve)
and the FDIC, working in cooperation with foreign governments and
other central banks, including the Bank of England, the European Central Bank and the Swiss
National Bank, have taken a variety of extraordinary measures designed to restore confidence in the
financial markets and to strengthen financial institutions, including capital injections,
guarantees of bank liabilities and the acquisition of illiquid assets from banks.
In particular, on October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the EESA)
was signed into law. Pursuant to the EESA, the U.S. Treasury has the authority to take a range of
actions for the purpose of stabilizing and providing liquidity to the U.S. financial markets and
has proposed several programs, including the purchase by the U.S. Treasury of certain troubled
assets from financial institutions (the Troubled Asset Relief Program) and the direct purchase
by the U.S. Treasury of equity of financial institutions (the Capital Purchase Program).
Other programs and actions taken by U.S. regulatory agencies include (i) the U.S. Treasurys
Temporary Guarantee Program for Money Market Funds, (ii) the FRBNYs Money Market Investor Funding
Facility (the MMIF Facility), which is designed to provide liquidity to U.S. money market
investors, (iii) the Federal Reserves Commercial Paper
7
Funding Facility, which is designed to provide liquidity to term funding markets by providing a
liquidity backstop to U.S. issuers of commercial paper, (iv) the
Federal Reserves Asset Backed
Commercial Paper Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility (the AML Facility), which is
designed to provide liquidity to money market mutual funds under
certain conditions by providing funding to U.S. depository institutions and bank
holding companies secured by high-quality asset-backed commercial
paper they purchased from those money market mutual funds, (v) the FDICs
Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program, which enables the FDIC to temporarily provide a 100%
guarantee of the senior debt of all FDIC-insured institutions and their holding companies, as well
as deposits in noninterest-bearing transaction deposit accounts, (vi) the Federal Reserves Primary Dealer Credit Facility,
which is designed to foster the financial markets generally, was
modified to expand the eligible collateral to include any collateral
eligible for tri-party repurchase agreements, (vii) the Federal
Reserves Term Securities Lending Facility, which is designed to
promote liquidity in the financial markets for
treasuries and other
collateral, was expanded to (a) include all investment-grade debt
securities as eligible collateral for schedule 2 auctions and (b) increase the frequency of schedule 2 auctions,
(viii) the Federal
Reserves adoption of an interim rule that provides an
exemption, until January 30, 2009, to the Federal Reserve Act to allow
insured depository institutions to provide liquidity to their
affiliates for assets typically funded in the tri-party repurchase
agreement market,
and (ix) the Federal Reserves Term Auction Facility, which is designed to allow financial institutions
to borrow funds at a rate that is below the discount rate.
Capital Purchase Program
Under the Capital Purchase Program, the U.S. Treasury will make $250 billion of capital available
to U.S. financial institutions in the form of preferred stock and a warrant to acquire common stock.
Pursuant to the Capital Purchase Program, on October 28, 2008, the Firm issued to the U.S.
Treasury, in exchange for aggregate consideration of
$25.0 billion, (i) 2.5 million shares of the
Firms Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series K, par value $1 and liquidation
preference $10,000 per share (and $25.0 billion liquidation preference in the aggregate) (the Series
K Preferred Stock), and (ii) a warrant (the Warrant) to purchase up to 88,401,697 shares of the
Firms common stock, at an exercise price of $42.42 per share.
The number of shares of common stock to be issued pursuant to the
Warrant and the exercise price of the Warrant is subject to
adjustment from time to time following, among other things, stock
splits, subdivisions or combinations, certain issuances of common
stock or convertible securities and certain repurchases of common
stock. The Series K Preferred Stock is nonvoting, qualifies as Tier 1 capital and ranks on parity
with the Firms other series of preferred stock. For a discussion of the Firms preferred stock,
see page 56 of this Form 10-Q and Note 22 on pages 141142 of this Form 10-Q.
The letter agreement between the U.S. Treasury and the Firm, dated October 26, 2008, including the
securities purchase agreement (the Purchase Agreement) concerning the issuance and sale of the
Series K Preferred Stock to the U.S. Treasury grants the holders of the Series K Preferred Stock,
the Warrant and JPMorgan Chase common stock to be issued under the Warrant certain registration
rights and imposes restrictions on dividend and stock repurchases. For a discussion of the dividend
and stock repurchase restrictions, see Capital Purchase Program
on page 55 and Note 22 on pages 141-142 of this Form 10-Q. In addition, the Purchase
Agreement subjects the Firm to the executive compensation limitations as set forth in Section
111(b) of the EESA.
MMIF Facility
The MMIF, authorized by the FRBNY, will support a private-sector initiative designed to
provide liquidity to U.S. money market investors. Under the MMIF Facility, the FRBNY will provide
senior secured funding to a series of special purpose vehicles to finance the purchase of eligible
assets such as commercial paper, bank note and certificates of
deposit from eligible investors. The Firm has been selected by the FRBNY to advise the
U.S. Treasury regarding the MMIF Facility.
AML Facility
On September 19, 2008, the Federal Reserve established a special lending facility, the AML
Facility, to provide liquidity to eligible U.S. money market mutual funds (MMMFs). Under the AML
Facility, participating banking
organizations purchase eligible high-quality asset-backed commercial
paper (ABCP) investments from MMMFs, which are then pledged
to secure nonrecourse advances from the Federal Reserve Bank of
Boston (FRBB); participating banking organizations do not bear any credit or
market risk related to the ABCP investments they hold under this facility and, therefore, the ABCP
investments held are not assessed any regulatory risk-based capital.
The AML Facility will be in effect
until January 30, 2009. The Firm is currently participating in the AML Facility.
8
EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW
This overview of managements discussion and analysis highlights selected information and may not
contain all of the information that is important to readers of this Form 10-Q. For a complete
description of events, trends and uncertainties, as well as the capital, liquidity, credit and
market risks, and the critical accounting estimates affecting the Firm and its various lines of
business, this Form 10-Q should be read in its entirety.
Financial performance of JPMorgan Chase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except per share and ratio data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Selected income statement data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
14,737 |
|
|
$ |
16,112 |
|
|
|
(9 |
)% |
|
$ |
50,026 |
|
|
$ |
53,988 |
|
|
|
(7 |
)% |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
3,811 |
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
11,690 |
|
|
|
4,322 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
Provision for credit losses accounting
conformity(a) |
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM |
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
11,137 |
|
|
|
9,327 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
32,245 |
|
|
|
30,983 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
3,373 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
4,322 |
|
|
|
12,394 |
|
|
|
(65 |
) |
Extraordinary gain(b) |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM |
|
Net income |
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
3,373 |
|
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
4,903 |
|
|
|
12,394 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
NM% |
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
|
$ |
3.52 |
|
|
|
(67 |
)% |
Net income |
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
(89 |
) |
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
Return on common equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The third quarter of 2008 included an accounting conformity loan loss reserve provision
related to the acquisition of Washington Mutuals banking operations. |
(b) |
|
JPMorgan Chase acquired Washington Mutuals banking operations from the FDIC for $1.9
billion. The fair value of Washington Mutual net assets acquired exceeded the purchase price
which resulted in negative goodwill. In accordance with SFAS 141, nonfinancial assets that are
not held-for-sale were written down against that negative goodwill. The negative goodwill that
remained after writing down nonfinancial assets was recognized as an extraordinary gain. |
Business overview
JPMorgan Chase reported 2008 third-quarter net income of $527 million, or $0.11 per share, compared
with net income of $3.4 billion, or $0.97 per share, for the third quarter of 2007. Return on
common equity for the quarter was 1%, compared with 11% in the prior year. On September 25, 2008,
JPMorgan Chase acquired Washington Mutuals banking operations, significantly strengthening its
consumer franchise, with the addition of more than 2,200 branches. Results in the third quarter
included an after-tax charge of $1.2 billion to conform loan loss reserves and an extraordinary
gain of $581 million related to this transaction. Excluding the conforming adjustment
for the Washington Mutual transaction, the decline in net income from the third quarter of 2007 was
driven by a significant increase in the provision for credit losses, higher noninterest expense and
lower net revenue. Lower net revenue reflected markdowns related to mortgage-related positions and
leveraged lending exposures in the Investment Bank, partially offset by increased net interest
income. The provision for credit losses rose predominantly due to increases in the allowance for
loan losses related to home equity, subprime and prime mortgage and credit card loans, as well as
higher net charge-offs. The increase in noninterest expense was driven by higher compensation
expense and additional operating costs relating to the Bear Stearns merger.
Net income for the first nine months of 2008 was $4.9 billion, or $1.32 per share, compared with
net income of $12.4 billion, or $3.52 per share, for the first nine months of 2007. Return on
common equity for the period was 5%, compared with 14% in the prior year. The lower results in the
first nine months of 2008 were due to the same drivers highlighted for the third quarter a
significantly higher provision for credit losses, markdowns related to mortgage-related positions
and leveraged lending exposures, and higher total noninterest expense, partially offset by
increased net interest income.
The financial crisis that has plagued the U.S. markets and economy for over a year intensified in
the third quarter of 2008, as did the global economic slowdown, resulting in sharp declines across
most equity markets that are expected to continue into the fourth quarter of 2008. Credit
volatility and the stress in financial markets resulted in
the occurrence of significant events during
the quarter: the U.S. federal government placed the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
(Freddie Mac) and Federal National Mortgage Association (Fannie Mae) under its direct control;
Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. declared bankruptcy; the Bank of America Corporation agreed to
acquire Merrill Lynch & Co., Inc.; the government provided a loan to American International Group,
Inc. (AIG) in exchange for an equity interest in AIG to prevent the insurers failure; and
Morgan Stanley and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. received approval from the Federal Reserve to become federal bank holding companies. The crisis of confidence was most
9
visible in the
liquidity pressures affecting the short-term funding markets, as evidenced by the LIBOR-Fed Funds rate disparity (i.e., 3-month
LIBOR rates surged over the expected Fed Funds rate). The rate disparity placed additional stress
on global banking systems and economies, as LIBOR represents a key benchmark that is used to set
other borrowing costs, including short-term business funding costs and rates on many types of mortgage
contracts. The Federal Reserve and other global central banking authorities have responded
with a series of initiatives to deal with the financial crisis and to make liquidity available to
the markets, as discussed on pages 7-8 of this Form 10-Q. Labor markets continued to struggle, with
the unemployment rate rising to 6.1% in September, reaching the highest level in the last five
years. Economic growth contracted in the third quarter due to a decline in real consumer spending,
as economic uncertainty weighed on the minds of consumers, as did high energy bills which continued to
squeeze budgets, and the benefits from the tax rebates provided by the Economic Stimulus Act of
2008 came to an end.
During the third quarter of 2008, the Firms performance was negatively affected by the weak
economic conditions and volatile financial markets. Markdowns on mortgage-related positions and
leveraged lending exposures reduced net revenue in the Investment Bank. Unprecedented challenges
facing the housing market resulted in a higher provision for credit losses and lower income in
Retail Financial Services. A higher provision for credit losses also lowered income in Card
Services. Asset Managements net income decreased due to lower performance fees and the effect of
lower markets. However, the Firm continued to show underlying business momentum, with four of its
six principal lines of business delivering double-digit revenue growth. The IB maintained its #1
rankings for Global Investment Banking Fees and Global Debt, Equity and Equity-related volumes for
the third quarter and first nine months of 2008; RFS increased branch production; and Commercial
Banking and Treasury & Securities Services delivered double-digit net income growth.
The discussion that follows highlights the current-quarter performance of each business segment,
compared with the prior-year quarter, and discusses results on a managed basis unless otherwise
noted. For more information about the Washington Mutual transaction, and its effects on current
quarter performance, see pages 9398 of this Form 10-Q. For more information about managed basis,
see Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firms Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on pages 1720
of this Form 10-Q .
Investment
Bank net income increased compared with the third quarter of 2007, reflecting an
increase in net revenue and the benefit of reduced deferred tax liabilities offset largely by
increased noninterest expense. Higher net revenue was driven by record Equity Markets revenue,
higher investment banking fees and increased Fixed Income Markets revenue. Fixed Income Markets
revenue reflected record results in rates and currencies, and strong performance in credit trading,
emerging markets, and commodities, largely offset by markdowns on mortgage-related positions and
leveraged lending funded and unfunded commitments. The provision for credit losses increased
slightly compared with the prior year, reflecting a weakening credit environment. The increase in
noninterest expense was largely driven by higher compensation expense and additional operating
costs relating to the Bear Stearns merger.
Retail
Financial Services net income declined, reflecting a significant increase in the provision
for credit losses in Regional Banking and higher noninterest expense in Mortgage Banking, offset
partially by revenue growth in all businesses. Net revenue benefited from increased net interest
income as a result of increased loan and deposit balances combined with wider deposit spreads, as
well as higher net mortgage servicing revenue and higher deposit-related fees. The provision for
credit losses increased as housing price declines have continued to result in significant increases
in estimated losses, particularly for high loan-to-value home equity and mortgage loans, and loans
in specific geographic areas that have been most heavily impacted by housing price declines.
Noninterest expense rose from the prior year, reflecting higher mortgage reinsurance losses and
increased servicing expense.
Card
Services net income declined, driven by a higher provision for credit losses partially offset
by lower noninterest expense. Managed net revenue increased slightly, as higher average managed
loan balances, wider loan spreads and increased interchange income were offset predominantly by the
effect of higher revenue reversals associated with higher charge-offs, increased rewards expense
and higher volume-driven payments to partners. The managed provision for credit losses increased
from the prior year due to a higher level of charge-offs and an increase in the allowance for loan
losses. Noninterest expense declined due to lower marketing expense.
Commercial
Banking net income increased, driven by record net revenue, partially offset by an
increase in the provision for credit losses and higher noninterest expense. The increase in revenue
resulted from double-digit growth in loan and liability balances and higher deposit-related and
investment banking fees, predominantly offset by spread compression in the liability and loan
portfolios. The increase in the provision for credit losses reflected a weakening credit
environment and growth in loan balances. Noninterest expense increased due to higher
performance-based compensation expense.
10
Treasury & Securities Services net income rose, driven by higher net revenue and the benefit of
reduced deferred tax liabilities, predominantly offset by higher noninterest expense. Worldwide
Securities Services revenue increased, driven by wider spreads on liability products and in
securities lending and foreign exchange, combined with increased product usage by new and existing
clients. Market depreciation partially offset these benefits. Treasury Services posted record
revenue, reflecting higher liability balances as well as volume growth in electronic funds transfer
products and trade loans. Noninterest expense increased, reflecting higher expense related to
business and volume growth as well as continued investment in new product platforms.
Asset
Management net income decreased, driven largely by lower net revenue. The decline in net
revenue was due to lower performance fees and the effect of lower markets, including the impact of
lower market valuations of seed capital investments. Partially offsetting these net revenue
declines were the benefit of the Bear Stearns merger, higher loan and deposit balances, and wider
deposit spreads. The provision for credit losses rose from the prior year, reflecting an increase
in loan balances and a lower level of recoveries. Noninterest expense was flat compared with the
prior year due to the effect of the Bear Stearns merger and increased headcount, offset by lower
performance-based compensation.
Corporate/Private Equity reported a net loss for the quarter. The net loss included a conforming
loan loss reserve provision and an extraordinary gain related to the acquisition of Washington
Mutuals banking operations. Excluding these items, the balance of the net loss resulted from
significantly lower net revenue and an increase in the provision for credit losses, offset
partially by a decrease in noninterest expense. The decline in net revenue was driven by a higher
level of trading losses, predominantly on preferred securities of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac;
private equity losses in the current quarter compared with gains in the prior-year quarter; and a
charge related to the offer to repurchase auction-rate securities
from certain customers. These declines were partially
offset by higher securities gains. The increase in the provision for credit losses was
predominantly related to an increase in the allowance for loan losses for prime mortgage. The
decrease in noninterest expense was driven by lower litigation expense.
The Firms managed provision for credit losses was $6.7 billion in the third quarter, including the
$2.0 billion charge to conform Washington Mutuals loan loss allowance. For the purposes of the
following analysis, this charge is excluded. The managed provision for credit losses was $4.7
billion, up $2.3 billion, or 98%, from the prior year. The total consumer-managed provision for
credit losses was $4.3 billion, compared with $2.0 billion in the prior year, reflecting increases
in the allowance for credit losses related to home equity, subprime and prime mortgage and credit
card loans, as well as higher net charge-offs. Consumer-managed net charge-offs were $3.3 billion,
compared with $1.7 billion in the prior year, resulting in managed net charge-off rates of 3.39%
and 1.96%, respectively. The wholesale provision for credit losses was $398 million, compared with
$351 million in the prior year, due to an increase in the allowance for credit losses reflecting
the effect of a weakening credit environment and loan growth. Wholesale net charge-offs were $52
million, compared with net charge-offs of $82 million, resulting in net charge-off rates of 0.10%
and 0.19%, respectively. The Firm had total nonperforming assets of $9.5 billion at September 30,
2008, up from the prior-year level of $3.0 billion. Substantially all of the loans acquired from
Washington Mutual that were nonperforming prior to the transaction closing are now considered to be
performing based upon the provisions of SOP 03-3. For additional information, see Note 13 on pages
120122 of this Form 10-Q.
Total stockholders equity at September 30, 2008, was $145.8 billion, and the Tier 1 capital ratio
was 8.9%, compared with 8.4% at September 30, 2007. During the quarter, the Firm raised $11.5
billion of common equity and $1.8 billion of preferred equity.
Business outlook
The following forward-looking statements are based upon the current beliefs and expectations of
JPMorgan Chases management and are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. These risks and
uncertainties could cause JPMorgan Chases actual results to differ materially from those set forth
in such forward-looking statements.
JPMorgan Chases outlook for the fourth quarter of 2008 should be viewed against the backdrop of
the global and U.S. economies, financial markets activity, the geopolitical environment, the
competitive environment and client activity levels. Each of these linked factors will affect the
performance of the Firm and its lines of business. The Firms current expectations are for the
global and U.S. economic environments to weaken further and potentially faster, for capital markets
to remain under stress and for a continued decline in U.S. housing prices. These factors have
affected, and are likely to continue to adversely impact, the
Firms credit costs, overall
business volumes and earnings.
11
The consumer provision for credit losses could increase substantially as a result of a higher level
of losses. Given the potential stress on the consumer from rising unemployment, the continued
downward pressure on housing prices and the elevated national inventory of unsold homes, management
remains extremely cautious with respect to the credit outlook for home equity, mortgage and credit
card portfolios. As described below, management expects continued deterioration in credit trends
for the consumer portfolios, which will likely require additions to the consumer loan loss
allowance in the fourth quarter of 2008. Housing price declines in specific geographic regions and
slowing economic growth could continue to drive higher estimated losses and nonperforming
assets for the home equity and subprime mortgage portfolios and to increasingly affect the prime
mortgage segment, due in part to the high concentration of more recent (2006 and later)
originations in this portfolio. Based on managements current economic outlook, quarterly net
charge-offs in the home lending portfolio, including home equity, prime, and subprime mortgages,
are expected to increase in the fourth quarter of 2008 and into 2009. Management expects the managed
net charge-off rate for Card Services to be 5% or above in the fourth quarter of 2008, and to
increase further in 2009; potentially, the Card Services net charge-off rate could be 6% in the
early part of 2009 and possibly reach 7% by the end of the year
(excluding the impact resulting from the acquisition of Washington
Mutuals banking operations). These charge-off rates could
increase even further if the economic environment continues to deteriorate more than current
management expectations. The wholesale provision for credit losses, nonperforming assets, and
charge-offs are expected to increase over time as a result of the deterioration in underlying
credit conditions. The wholesale provision may also increase due to loan growth.
The Investment Bank continues to be negatively affected by the disruption in the credit and
mortgage markets, as well as by overall lower levels of liquidity and wider credit spreads. The
continuation of these factors could potentially lead to reduced levels of client activity, lower
investment banking fees and lower trading revenue. In addition, if the Firms own credit spreads
tighten, the change in the fair value of certain trading liabilities would also negatively affect
trading results. The Firm held $12.9 billion (gross notional) of legacy leveraged loans and
unfunded commitments as held-for-sale as of September 30, 2008. Markdowns averaging 29% of the
gross notional value have been taken on these legacy positions as of September 30, 2008. Leveraged
loans and unfunded commitments are difficult to hedge effectively, and if market conditions further
deteriorate, additional markdowns may be necessary on this asset class. The Investment Bank also
held, at September 30, 2008, an aggregate $8.1 billion of prime and Alt-A mortgage exposure, which
is also difficult to hedge effectively, and $1.2 billion of
subprime mortgage exposure. In addition, the Investment Bank had $9.3 billion of commercial
mortgage-backed securities (CMBS) exposure. During the quarter,
mortgage exposure of $4.3 billion,
primarily consisting of prime loans and securities, was transferred to the Firms corporate investment portfolio. Even with respect to mortgage exposure that is
being actively hedged, such mortgage exposures could be adversely affected by worsening market
conditions, further deterioration in the housing market and market activity.
Funding markets have remained challenging, with a wide differential between prime and LIBOR rates.
Management expects that if there is a continuation of this rate dislocation, Card Services net
income could be significantly reduced in the fourth quarter of 2008. Earnings in Treasury &
Securities Services and Asset Management will likely deteriorate if business volumes or assets
under custody, management or supervision decline, volatility in certain products decreases, or
spreads narrow. Given recent equity market declines, management expects that fourth quarter
earnings for these market-sensitive businesses will be lower. Management also continues to believe
that the net quarterly loss in Corporate could average approximately $50 million to $100 million,
excluding trading results related to the Firms investment portfolio (which could be volatile) and
credit costs related to prime mortgage exposures (which are expected to increase from third quarter
levels, as discussed within the consumer outlook section above). Private Equity results, which are
dependent upon the capital markets, are likely to remain depressed and continue to be negative in
the fourth quarter.
Management believes the net income impact of the acquisition of Washington Mutuals banking
operations could be approximately $0.50 per share in 2009, with a pro rata portion expected in the
fourth quarter of 2008. Management also believes the Firm will incur merger costs related to this
transaction of approximately $500 million (after tax), with approximately $100 million (after tax)
of expense recognized in the fourth quarter and the remainder incurred through 2011. Also, the Firm
anticipates recognizing an after-tax gain of approximately $600 million in the fourth quarter of
2008, related to the dissolution of the Chase Paymentech Solutions, LLC joint venture on November 1,
2008.
12
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
This section provides a comparative discussion of JPMorgan Chases Consolidated Results of
Operations on a reported basis. Factors that related primarily to a single business segment are
discussed in more detail within that business segment. For a discussion of the Critical Accounting
Estimates Used by the Firm that affect the Consolidated Results of Operations, see pages 8587 of
this Form 10-Q and pages 9698 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
Total net revenue
The following table presents the components of total net revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking fees |
|
$ |
1,316 |
|
|
$ |
1,336 |
|
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
$ |
4,144 |
|
|
$ |
4,973 |
|
|
|
(17 |
)% |
Principal transactions |
|
|
(2,763 |
) |
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(2,814 |
) |
|
|
8,850 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
Lending & deposit-related fees |
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
3,312 |
|
|
|
2,872 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Asset management,
administration and commissions |
|
|
3,485 |
|
|
|
3,663 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
10,709 |
|
|
|
10,460 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Securities gains |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
Mortgage fees and related income |
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Credit card income |
|
|
1,771 |
|
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,370 |
|
|
|
5,054 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Other income |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
5,743 |
|
|
|
9,199 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
25,079 |
|
|
|
34,805 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
Net interest income |
|
|
8,994 |
|
|
|
6,913 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
24,947 |
|
|
|
19,183 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
14,737 |
|
|
$ |
16,112 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
50,026 |
|
|
$ |
53,988 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue for the third quarter of 2008 was $14.7 billion, down $1.4 billion, or 9%,
from the prior year. The decrease was due to a significant decline in principal transactions
revenue, which included net markdowns on mortgage-related positions and leveraged lending funded
and unfunded commitments, losses on preferred securities of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and losses
on private equity investments; higher net interest income predominantly offset the decline. For the
first nine months of 2008, total net revenue was $50.0 billion, down $4.0 billion, or 7%, from the
prior year, largely reflecting the same drivers as the quarter, although the Firm had private
equity gains in the first nine months of 2008 versus losses in the third quarter of 2008. However,
these gains were lower than the gains in the first nine months of 2007. Also contributing to the
decline in total net revenue were lower investment banking fees and the Firms share of Bear
Stearns losses from April 8 to May 30, 2008. These were largely offset by the proceeds from the
sale of Visa shares in its initial public offering and higher securities gains from the sale of
MasterCard shares.
Investment banking fees were down slightly in the third quarter of 2008 compared with the third
quarter of 2007. For the first nine months of 2008, fees declined from the record level of the
comparable period last year due to lower debt underwriting fees and advisory fees, which were both
at record levels in the first nine months of 2007. For a further discussion of investment banking
fees, which are primarily recorded in IB, see the IB segment results on pages 2225 of this Form
10-Q.
Principal transactions revenue consists of trading revenue and private equity gains. The Firms
trading activities in the third quarter and first nine months of 2008 decreased significantly from
the comparable periods of 2007. The decrease in the third quarter was largely driven by
mortgage-related net markdowns of $2.6 billion and net markdowns on leveraged lending funded and
unfunded commitments of $1.0 billion, as well as losses of $1.0 billion on preferred securities of
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Partially offsetting the decline in trading revenue were record results
in rates and currencies, strong performance in credit trading, emerging markets and commodities,
strong equity trading and client revenue, and total gains of
$956 million from the widening of
the Firms credit spread on certain structured liabilities and
derivatives compared with $582
million for the third quarter of 2007. The decline in trading revenue for the first nine months of
2008 was due to the aforementioned significant markdowns, including
$4.7 billion on
mortgage-related positions as well as $2.8 billion on leveraged lending funded and unfunded
commitments. These markdowns were offset partially by strong performances in the aforementioned
trading products, as well as total gains of $2.8 billion from the widening of the Firms
credit spread on certain structured liabilities and derivatives
compared with $955 million for the
first nine months of 2007. Private equity gains also declined compared with the third quarter and
first nine months of 2007, driven by a net loss in the third quarter of 2008, and lower net gains
for the first nine months. In addition, the first quarter of 2007 included a fair value adjustment
related to the adoption of SFAS 157. For a further discussion of principal transactions revenue,
see the IB and Corporate/Private Equity segment results on pages
2225 and 4749, respectively,
and Note 5 on pages 111113 of this Form 10-Q.
13
Lending & deposit-related fees rose from the third quarter and first nine months of 2007,
predominantly resulting from higher deposit-related fees. For a
further discussion of lending & deposit-related fees, which are mostly recorded in RFS, TSS and CB, see the RFS segment results on
pages 2632 the TSS segment results on pages 4042, and the CB segment results on pages 3739 of
this Form 10-Q.
The decrease in asset management, administration and commissions revenue compared with the third
quarter of 2007 was largely due to lower asset management fees in AM as a result of lower
performance fees and the effect of lower markets. This decline was partially offset by higher
commissions revenue driven by higher brokerage transaction volume (primarily included within equity
markets revenue of IB). For the first nine months of 2008, asset management, administration and
commissions revenue increased due predominantly to higher commissions revenue and the absence of a
charge in RFS in the first quarter of 2007 associated with the accelerated surrenders of customer
annuity contracts. TSS also contributed to the increase in asset management, administration and
commissions, driven by the benefit of short-term interest rates in securities lending and increased
product usage by new and existing clients (largely in custody, funds services and depositary
receipts). These results were partially offset by lower asset management fees in AM as a result of
lower performance fees and the effect of lower markets. For additional information on these fees
and commissions, see the segment discussions for IB on pages 2225, RFS on pages 2632, TSS on
pages 4042, and AM on pages 4346, of this Form 10-Q.
The increase in securities gains for the third quarter of 2008, compared with the same period in
2007, was due to the repositioning of the Corporate investment securities portfolio, partially
offset by gains of $115 million recognized in 2007 from the sale of MasterCard shares and
marketable securities received from loan workouts in IB. In the first nine months of 2008,
securities gains increased due to the repositioning of the Corporate investment securities
portfolio and higher gains from the sale of MasterCard shares. For a further discussion of
securities gains, which are mostly recorded in the Firms Corporate business, see the
Corporate/Private Equity segment discussion on pages 4749 of this Form 10-Q.
Mortgage fees and related income increased from the third quarter and first nine months of 2007,
driven by higher net mortgage servicing revenue, which benefited from increased loan servicing
revenue and an improvement in mortgage servicing rights (MSR) risk management results, and higher
production revenue, which reflected lower markdowns on the mortgage warehouse and pipeline. These
increases were offset partially by increased reserves related to the repurchase of previously sold
loans. For the first nine months of 2008, production revenue was also positively impacted by higher
loan originations. For a discussion of mortgage fees and related income, which is recorded
primarily in RFS Mortgage Banking business, see the Mortgage Banking discussion on pages 3031 of
this Form 10-Q.
Credit card income decreased slightly from the third quarter of 2007, driven primarily by lower
servicing fees earned in connection with CS securitization activities, which were negatively
affected by higher credit losses on securitized credit card loans. Also contributing to the
decrease in credit card income were increased expense related to rewards programs and higher
volume-driven payments to partners. Partially offsetting the declines was higher interchange income
as a result of an increase in customer charge volume. Credit card income rose in the first nine
months of 2008 due to increased servicing fees, which reflected the impact of a higher level of
securitized receivables, and an increase in interchange income. Higher customer charge volume in CS
and higher debit card transaction volume in RFS drove the increase in interchange income. These
results were partially offset by the increases in volume-driven payments to partners and expense
related to rewards programs. For a further discussion of credit card income, see CS segment
results on pages 3336 of this Form 10-Q.
The decline in other income from the third quarter of 2007 was predominantly due to a $375 million
charge related to the offer to repurchase auction-rate securities at par, markdowns on certain
investments, including seed capital in AM, lower gains on education loan sales and higher losses on
other real estate owned, partially offset by higher gains on sales of certain assets. For the first
nine months of 2008, other income increased due predominantly to the proceeds from the sale of Visa
shares in its initial public offering ($1.5 billion pretax), higher automobile operating lease
revenue and credit card net securitization gains. The increase in other income was partially offset
by losses of $423 million (after-tax) reflecting the Firms 49.4% ownership in Bear Stearns losses
from April 8 to May 30, 2008, and the net negative impact of the aforementioned drivers of the
decline in other income in the third quarter of 2008.
Net interest income rose from the third quarter and first nine months of 2007, due predominantly to
the following: higher trading-related net interest income, higher wholesale and consumer loan
balances, growth in liability and deposit balances in the wholesale and consumer businesses, wider
spreads on credit card balances and deposit balances in RFS and AM, and a wider net interest spread
in the Corporate business. These benefits were offset partially by spread compression on deposit
and liability products in CB. The Firms total average interest-earning assets for the third
quarter of 2008 were $1.3 trillion, up 16% from the third quarter of 2007. The increase was
predominantly driven by higher loans, securities borrowed, other assets, federal funds sold and
securities purchased under resale agreements and available-for-sale (AFS) securities,
14
predominantly offset by lower trading assets debt instruments. The net interest yield on these
assets, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, was 2.73%, an increase of 30 basis points from the
third quarter of 2007. The Firms total average interest earning assets for the first nine months
of 2008 were $1.3 trillion, up 15% from the first nine months of
2007, driven by the same factors as drove the 2008 third quarter
results, as well as by higher trading assets debt instruments
and higher deposits with banks.
The net interest yield on these assets, on a fully taxable equivalent basis, was 2.68%, an increase
of 31 basis points from the first nine months of 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Wholesale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
$ |
398 |
|
|
$ |
351 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
$ |
1,650 |
|
|
$ |
626 |
|
|
|
164 |
% |
Provision for credit losses
accounting conformity(a) |
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Total wholesale provision for
credit losses |
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
2,214 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
3,413 |
|
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
10,040 |
|
|
|
3,696 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
Provision for credit losses
accounting conformity(a) |
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer provision for
credit losses |
|
|
4,825 |
|
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
11,452 |
|
|
|
3,696 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for credit losses |
|
$ |
5,787 |
|
|
$ |
1,785 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
$ |
13,666 |
|
|
$ |
4,322 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The third quarter of 2008 included an accounting conformity loan loss reserve provision
related to the acquisition of Washington Mutuals banking operations. |
Provision for credit losses
The provision for credit losses in the third quarter and first nine months of 2008 rose
significantly when compared with the prior-year periods due to increases in both the consumer and
wholesale provisions. Affecting both the consumer and wholesale provisions was a $2.0 billion
charge to conform Washington Mutuals loan loss allowance. In addition, the consumer provision
reflected higher estimated losses for the home equity, subprime mortgage, prime mortgage and credit
card loan portfolios. The additional increase in the wholesale provision was driven by the effect
of a weakening credit environment and loan growth. The wholesale provision for the first nine
months of 2008 also included the effect of the transfer of funded and unfunded leverage lending
commitments to retained loans from held-for-sale. For a more detailed discussion of the loan
portfolio and the allowance for loan losses, see the segment discussions for RFS on pages 2632,
CS on pages 3336, IB on pages 2225, CB on pages 3739 and Credit Risk Management on pages
6480 of this Form 10-Q.
Noninterest expense
The following table presents the components of noninterest expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Compensation expense |
|
$ |
5,858 |
|
|
$ |
4,677 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
$ |
17,722 |
|
|
$ |
17,220 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
Occupancy expense |
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
2,083 |
|
|
|
1,949 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Technology, communications and equipment
expense |
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
|
2,793 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Professional & outside services |
|
|
1,451 |
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
4,234 |
|
|
|
3,719 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Other expense |
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
2,498 |
|
|
|
2,560 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
Merger costs |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
$ |
11,137 |
|
|
$ |
9,327 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
$ |
32,245 |
|
|
$ |
30,983 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
15
Total noninterest expense for the third quarter of 2008 was $11.1 billion, up $1.8 billion, or
19%, from the third quarter of 2007. For the first nine months of 2008, total noninterest expense
was $32.2 billion, up $1.3 billion, or 4%, from the prior year. The increase in both periods was
driven by higher compensation expense and additional operating costs relating to the Bear Stearns
merger, partially offset in the first nine months of 2008 by lower performance-based incentives.
The increase in Compensation expense for the third quarter and first nine months of 2008 was
predominantly driven by the merger with Bear Stearns and additional headcount due to investments in
the businesses. The increase in compensation expense for the first nine months of 2008 was
partially offset by lower performance-based incentives.
The increase in occupancy expense from the third quarter and first nine months of 2007 was driven
by the merger with Bear Stearns.
Technology, communications and equipment expense increased compared with the third quarter and
first nine months of 2007, due to additional operating costs related to the Bear Stearns merger,
the impact of business and volume growth and increased depreciation expense on owned automobiles
subject to operating leases in the Auto Finance business.
Professional & outside services rose from the third quarter and first nine months of 2007,
reflecting higher expense related to business and volume growth, including higher brokerage
expense in IB, partly from the Bear Stearns merger, and continued investment
in new product platforms in TSS.
Marketing expense declined compared with the third quarter and first nine months of 2007,
reflecting lower credit card and retail marketing expense.
The increase in other expense from the third quarter of 2007 was due to higher mortgage reinsurance
losses, increased mortgage servicing expense and the effect of the Bear Stearns merger, partially
offset by a net reduction in litigation expense. For the first nine months of 2008, other expense
declined due largely to a net reduction of litigation expense, offset partially by the
aforementioned items.
For a discussion of amortization of intangibles and merger costs, refer to Note 18 and Note 10 on
pages 135137 and 117, respectively, of this Form 10-Q.
Income tax expense
The Firms income (loss) before income tax expense and extraordinary gain, income tax expense
(benefit) and effective tax rate were as follows for each of the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except rate) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense and
extraordinary gain |
|
$ |
(2,187 |
) |
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,115 |
|
|
$ |
18,683 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(2,133 |
) |
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
6,289 |
|
Effective tax rate |
|
|
97.5 |
% |
|
|
32.5 |
% |
|
|
(5.0 |
) |
|
|
33.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in the effective tax rate for the third quarter and first nine months of 2008,
compared with the same periods for 2007, was the result of lower reported pretax income combined
with an increased proportion of income that was not subject to U.S. federal income taxes, increased
tax credits, and the realization of a $927 million benefit from the release of deferred tax
liabilities associated with the undistributed earnings of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries that were
deemed to be reinvested indefinitely, which is discussed further in Note 26 on page 144 of this
Form 10-Q.
Extraordinary gain
The Firm recorded an extraordinary gain of $581 million in the third quarter of 2008
associated with the acquisition of the banking operations of
Washington Mutual. The transaction is
being accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with SFAS 141. The
adjusted net asset value of the banking operations after purchase accounting adjustments was higher
than the consideration paid by JPMorgan Chase, resulting in an extraordinary gain. There were no
extraordinary gains recorded in any other period in 2007 or 2008.
16
EXPLANATION AND RECONCILIATION OF THE FIRMS USE OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURES
The Firm prepares its consolidated financial statements using accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP); these financial statements appear on pages
8992 of this Form 10-Q. That presentation, which is referred to as reported basis, provides the
reader with an understanding of the Firms results that can be tracked consistently from year to
year and enables a comparison of the Firms performance with other companies U.S. GAAP financial
statements.
In addition to analyzing the Firms results on a reported basis, management reviews the Firms and
the lines of business results on a managed basis, which is a non-GAAP financial measure. The
Firms definition of managed basis starts with the reported U.S. GAAP results and includes certain
reclassifications that assume credit card loans securitized by CS remain on the balance sheet and
presents revenue on a fully taxable-equivalent (FTE) basis. These adjustments do not have any
impact on net income as reported by the lines of business or by the Firm as a whole.
The presentation of CS results on a managed basis assumes that credit card loans that have been
securitized and sold in accordance with SFAS 140 remain on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and that
the earnings on the securitized loans are classified in the same manner as the earnings on retained
loans recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. JPMorgan Chase uses the concept of managed basis
to evaluate the credit performance and overall financial performance of the entire managed credit
card portfolio. Operations are funded and decisions are made about allocating resources, such as
employees and capital, based upon managed financial information. In addition, the same underwriting
standards and ongoing risk monitoring are used for both loans on the Consolidated Balance Sheets
and securitized loans. Although securitizations result in the sale of credit card receivables to a
trust, JPMorgan Chase retains the ongoing customer relationships, as the customers may continue to
use their credit cards; accordingly, the customers credit performance will affect both the
securitized loans and the loans retained on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. JPMorgan Chase
believes managed basis information is useful to investors, enabling them to understand both the
credit risks associated with the loans reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and the Firms
retained interests in securitized loans. For a reconciliation of reported to managed basis results
for CS, see CS segment results on pages 3336 of this Form 10-Q. For information regarding the
securitization process, and loans and residual interests sold and securitized, see Note 16 on pages
124130 of this Form 10-Q.
Total net revenue for each of the business segments and the Firm is presented on a FTE basis.
Accordingly, revenue from tax-exempt securities and investments that receive tax credits is
presented in the managed results on a basis comparable to taxable securities and investments. This
non-GAAP financial measure allows management to assess the comparability of revenue arising from
both taxable and tax-exempt sources. The corresponding income tax impact related to these items is
recorded within income tax expense.
Management also uses certain non-GAAP financial measures at the business segment level because it
believes these other non-GAAP financial measures provide information to investors about the
underlying operational performance and trends of the particular business segment and therefore
facilitate a comparison of the business segment with the performance of its competitors.
17
The following summary table provides a reconciliation from the Firms reported U.S. GAAP results to
managed basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully |
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
Credit |
|
tax-equivalent |
|
Managed |
(in millions, except per share and ratio data) |
|
results |
|
card(c) |
|
adjustments |
|
basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking fees |
|
$ |
1,316 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,316 |
|
Principal transactions |
|
|
(2,763 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,763 |
) |
Lending & deposit-related fees |
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,168 |
|
Asset management, administration and commissions |
|
|
3,485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,485 |
|
Securities gains |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
424 |
|
Mortgage fees and related income |
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
457 |
|
Credit card income |
|
|
1,771 |
|
|
|
(843 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
928 |
|
Other income |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
208 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
5,743 |
|
|
|
(843 |
) |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
5,223 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
8,994 |
|
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
10,865 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
14,737 |
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
16,088 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
3,811 |
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,684 |
|
Provision for credit losses accounting conformity(a) |
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,976 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
11,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income
(loss) before income tax expense (benefit) and extraordinary gain |
|
|
(2,187 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
(1,709 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(2,133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
(1,655 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
Extraordinary gain |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
527 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share(b) |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on common equity(b) |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(1 |
)% |
Return on equity less goodwill(b) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Return on assets(b) |
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(0.01 |
) |
Overhead ratio |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully |
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
Credit |
|
tax-equivalent |
|
Managed |
(in millions, except per share and ratio data) |
|
results |
|
card(c) |
|
adjustments |
|
basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking fees |
|
$ |
1,336 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,336 |
|
Principal transactions |
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
650 |
|
Lending & deposit-related fees |
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,026 |
|
Asset management, administration and commissions |
|
|
3,663 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,663 |
|
Securities gains |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
237 |
|
Mortgage fees and related income |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221 |
|
Credit card income |
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
|
(836 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
941 |
|
Other income |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
9,199 |
|
|
|
(836 |
) |
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
8,555 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
6,913 |
|
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
8,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
16,112 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
16,977 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,363 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
9,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,327 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense and extraordinary gain |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
5,287 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
1,914 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before extraordinary gain |
|
|
3,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,373 |
|
Extraordinary gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,373 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,373 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share(b) |
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on common equity(b) |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
Return on equity less goodwill(b) |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
Return on assets(b) |
|
|
0.91 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
0.87 |
|
Overhead ratio |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully |
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
Credit |
|
tax-equivalent |
|
Managed |
(in millions, except per share and ratio data) |
|
results |
|
card(c) |
|
adjustments |
|
basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking fees |
|
$ |
4,144 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,144 |
|
Principal transactions |
|
|
(2,814 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,814 |
) |
Lending & deposit-related fees |
|
|
3,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,312 |
|
Asset management, administration and commissions |
|
|
10,709 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,709 |
|
Securities gains |
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
Mortgage fees and related income |
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
Credit card income |
|
|
5,370 |
|
|
|
(2,623 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,747 |
|
Other income |
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
2,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
25,079 |
|
|
|
(2,623 |
) |
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
23,229 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
24,947 |
|
|
|
5,007 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
30,435 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
50,026 |
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
53,664 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
11,690 |
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,074 |
|
Provision for credit losses accounting conformity(a) |
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,976 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
32,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense (benefit) and
extraordinary gain |
|
|
4,115 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
5,369 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
1,047 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before extraordinary gain |
|
|
4,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,322 |
|
Extraordinary gain |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,903 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share(b) |
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on common equity(b) |
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
Return on equity less goodwill(b) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Return on assets(b) |
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
Overhead ratio |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fully |
|
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
Credit |
|
tax-equivalent |
|
Managed |
(in millions, except per share and ratio data) |
|
results |
|
card(c) |
|
adjustments |
|
basis |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking fees |
|
$ |
4,973 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,973 |
|
Principal transactions |
|
|
8,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,850 |
|
Lending & deposit-related fees |
|
|
2,872 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,872 |
|
Asset management, administration and commissions |
|
|
10,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,460 |
|
Securities gains |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
|
Mortgage fees and related income |
|
|
1,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
Credit card income |
|
|
5,054 |
|
|
|
(2,370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,684 |
|
Other income |
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
1,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
34,805 |
|
|
|
(2,370 |
) |
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
32,936 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
19,183 |
|
|
|
4,131 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
23,601 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
53,988 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
56,537 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
4,322 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,083 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
30,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense and extraordinary gain |
|
|
18,683 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
19,471 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
6,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
7,077 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before extraordinary gain |
|
|
12,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,394 |
|
Extraordinary gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
12,394 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share(b) |
|
$ |
3.52 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return on common equity(b) |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
Return on equity less goodwill(b) |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
Return on assets(b) |
|
|
1.16 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
1.11 |
|
Overhead ratio |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
(in millions) |
|
Reported |
|
|
Securitized |
|
|
Managed |
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Securitized |
|
|
Managed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Period-end |
|
$ |
761,381 |
|
|
$ |
93,664 |
(d) |
|
$ |
855,045 |
|
|
$ |
486,320 |
|
|
$ |
69,643 |
|
|
$ |
555,963 |
|
Total assets average |
|
|
1,756,359 |
|
|
|
75,712 |
|
|
|
1,832,071 |
|
|
|
1,477,334 |
|
|
|
66,100 |
|
|
|
1,543,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
(in millions) |
|
Reported |
|
|
Securitized |
|
|
Managed |
|
|
Reported |
|
|
Securitized |
|
|
Managed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Period-end |
|
$ |
761,381 |
|
|
$ |
93,664 |
(d) |
|
$ |
855,045 |
|
|
$ |
486,320 |
|
|
$ |
69,643 |
|
|
$ |
555,963 |
|
Total assets average |
|
|
1,665,285 |
|
|
|
73,966 |
|
|
|
1,739,251 |
|
|
|
1,429,772 |
|
|
|
65,715 |
|
|
|
1,495,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The third quarter of 2008 included an accounting conformity loan loss reserve provision
related to the acquisition of Washington Mutuals banking operations. |
(b) |
|
Based upon income (loss) before extraordinary gain. |
(c) |
|
Credit card securitizations affect CS. See pages 3336 of this Form 10-Q for further
information. |
(d) |
|
Included securitized loans acquired in the Washington Mutual transaction of $11.9 billion at
September 30, 2008. |
BUSINESS SEGMENT RESULTS
The Firm is managed on a line-of-business basis. The business segment financial results
presented reflect the current organization of JPMorgan Chase. There are six major reportable
business segments: the Investment Bank, Retail Financial Services, Card Services, Commercial
Banking, Treasury & Securities Services and Asset Management, as well as a Corporate/Private Equity
segment. The business segments are determined based upon the products and services provided, or the
type of customer served, and they reflect the manner in which financial information is currently
evaluated by management. Results of these lines of business are presented on a managed basis. For
further discussion of Business Segment Results, see pages 3839 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual
Report.
As part of the Bear Stearns merger integration, the businesses of Bear Stearns were reviewed and
aligned with the business segments of JPMorgan Chase. The Merger predominantly affected the IB and
AM lines of business. The impact of the Merger on the JPMorgan Chase business segments is discussed
in the segment results of the applicable line of business.
Description of business segment reporting methodology
Results of the business segments are intended to reflect each segment as if it were essentially a
stand-alone business. The management reporting process that derives business segment results
allocates income and expense using market-based methodologies. For a further discussion of those
methodologies, see Business Segment Results Description of business segment reporting
methodology on page 38 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report. The Firm continues to assess the
assumptions, methodologies and reporting classifications used for segment reporting, and further
refinements may be implemented in future periods.
Capital allocation
Line of business equity increased during the second quarter of 2008 in IB and AM due to the Bear
Stearns merger, and for AM, the purchase of the additional equity
interest in Highbridge. At the end of the third quarter of 2008, equity was increased for each line of
business with a view toward the future implementation of the new
Basel II capital rules. For further details
on these rules, see Basel II on page 57 of this Form 10-Q. In addition, capital allocated to RFS, CS,
and CB was increased as a result of the acquisition of Washington Mutuals banking operations.
20
Effect of Washington Mutual on business segment presentation
The effects of Washington Mutuals banking operations are not included in the following business
segment results as such operations did not have a material effect on the results of the quarter
ended September 30, 2008, except with respect to the charge to conform Washington Mutuals loan loss reserves and
the extraordinary gain related to the transaction, both of which are reflected for JPMorgan Chase in the
Corporate/Private Equity segment. Information regarding Washington Mutuals banking operations is
presented in this section on pages 4950 of this Form 10-Q.
Segment Results Managed Basis(a)
The following table summarizes the business segment results for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return |
September 30, |
|
Total net revenue |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
on equity |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Bank |
|
$ |
4,035 |
|
|
$ |
2,946 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
|
$ |
3,816 |
|
|
$ |
2,378 |
|
|
|
60 |
% |
|
$ |
882 |
|
|
$ |
296 |
|
|
|
198 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
Retail Financial Services |
|
|
4,875 |
|
|
|
4,201 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
2,772 |
|
|
|
2,469 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Card Services |
|
|
3,887 |
|
|
|
3,867 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
786 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Commercial Banking |
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Treasury & Securities Services |
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
1,748 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Asset Management |
|
|
1,961 |
|
|
|
2,205 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
521 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Corporate/Private Equity(b) |
|
|
(1,748 |
) |
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(1,963 |
) |
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
16,088 |
|
|
$ |
16,977 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
$ |
11,137 |
|
|
$ |
9,327 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
$ |
527 |
|
|
$ |
3,373 |
|
|
|
(84 |
)% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Return |
September 30, |
|
Total net revenue |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
on equity |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Bank |
|
$ |
12,516 |
|
|
$ |
14,998 |
|
|
|
(17 |
)% |
|
$ |
11,103 |
|
|
$ |
10,063 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
$ |
1,189 |
|
|
$ |
3,015 |
|
|
|
(61 |
)% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
Retail Financial Services |
|
|
14,592 |
|
|
|
12,664 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
8,012 |
|
|
|
7,360 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
2,283 |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Card Services |
|
|
11,566 |
|
|
|
11,264 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3,651 |
|
|
|
3,691 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
2,310 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Commercial Banking |
|
|
3,298 |
|
|
|
3,019 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Treasury & Securities Services |
|
|
5,885 |
|
|
|
5,015 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
3,884 |
|
|
|
3,358 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
975 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Asset Management |
|
|
5,926 |
|
|
|
6,246 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
4,085 |
|
|
|
3,956 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Corporate/Private Equity(b) |
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
3,331 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
(1,358 |
) |
|
|
1,526 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
53,664 |
|
|
$ |
56,537 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)% |
|
$ |
32,245 |
|
|
$ |
30,983 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
4,903 |
|
|
$ |
12,394 |
|
|
|
(60 |
)% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents reported results on a tax-equivalent basis and excludes the impact of credit
card securitizations. |
(b) |
|
The third quarter of 2008 included an accounting conformity loan loss reserve provision of
$1.2 billion (after-tax) and an extraordinary gain of $581 million related to the
Washington Mutual transaction, as well as losses on preferred equity interests in Fannie Mae
and Freddie Mac. |
21
INVESTMENT BANK
For a discussion of the business profile of the IB, see pages 4042 of JPMorgan Chases 2007
Annual Report and page 5 of this Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement data |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking fees |
|
$ |
1,593 |
|
|
$ |
1,330 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
$ |
4,534 |
|
|
$ |
4,959 |
|
|
|
(9 |
)% |
Principal transactions |
|
|
(922 |
) |
|
|
(435 |
) |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(882 |
) |
|
|
5,032 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
Lending & deposit-related fees |
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
118 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Asset management, administration
and commissions |
|
|
847 |
|
|
|
712 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
|
|
1,996 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
All other income |
|
|
(279 |
) |
|
|
(76 |
) |
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
(571 |
) |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
1,357 |
|
|
|
1,649 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
5,706 |
|
|
|
12,379 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
Net interest income |
|
|
2,678 |
|
|
|
1,297 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
6,810 |
|
|
|
2,619 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue(a) |
|
|
4,035 |
|
|
|
2,946 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
12,516 |
|
|
|
14,998 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
175 |
|
Credit reimbursement from TSS(b) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
2,162 |
|
|
|
1,178 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
6,535 |
|
|
|
6,404 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Noncompensation expense |
|
|
1,654 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
4,568 |
|
|
|
3,659 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
3,816 |
|
|
|
2,378 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
11,103 |
|
|
|
10,063 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax
expense |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
4,572 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit)(c) |
|
|
(866 |
) |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(935 |
) |
|
|
1,557 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
882 |
|
|
$ |
296 |
|
|
|
198 |
|
|
$ |
1,189 |
|
|
$ |
3,015 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
ROA |
|
|
0.39 |
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
|
0.59 |
|
|
|
|
|
Overhead ratio |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense as a % of total
net revenue |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue by business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advisory |
|
$ |
576 |
|
|
$ |
595 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
1,429 |
|
|
$ |
1,627 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Equity underwriting |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
1,419 |
|
|
|
1,169 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Debt underwriting |
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
1,686 |
|
|
|
2,163 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total investment banking fees |
|
|
1,593 |
|
|
|
1,330 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
4,534 |
|
|
|
4,959 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
Fixed income markets |
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
3,628 |
|
|
|
5,724 |
|
|
|
(37 |
) |
Equity markets |
|
|
1,650 |
|
|
|
537 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
|
|
3,705 |
|
|
|
3,325 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Credit portfolio |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
392 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
990 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
4,035 |
|
|
$ |
2,946 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
$ |
12,516 |
|
|
$ |
14,998 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue by region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americas |
|
$ |
1,052 |
|
|
$ |
1,016 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
4,753 |
|
|
$ |
7,037 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
Europe/Middle East/Africa |
|
|
2,509 |
|
|
|
1,389 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
5,662 |
|
|
|
5,967 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Asia/Pacific |
|
|
474 |
|
|
|
541 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
2,101 |
|
|
|
1,994 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
4,035 |
|
|
$ |
2,946 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
$ |
12,516 |
|
|
$ |
14,998 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Total net revenue included tax-equivalent adjustments, predominantly due to income tax
credits related to affordable housing investments and tax-exempt income from municipal bond
investments of $427 million and $255 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and
2007, respectively, and $1.1 billion and $697 million for year-to-date 2008 and 2007,
respectively. |
(b) |
|
TSS is charged a credit reimbursement related to certain exposures managed within the IB
credit portfolio on behalf of clients shared with TSS. |
(c) |
|
The income tax benefit in the third quarter and year-to-date 2008 is predominantly the
result of reduced deferred tax liabilities on overseas earnings. |
22
Quarterly results
Net income was $882 million, an increase of $586 million from the prior year. The improved results
reflected an increase in net revenue and the benefit of reduced deferred tax liabilities offset
largely by increased noninterest expense.
Net revenue was $4.0 billion, an increase of $1.1 billion, or 37%, from the prior year. Investment
banking fees were $1.6 billion, up 20% from the prior year. Advisory fees were $576 million, down
3% from the prior year, reflecting decreased levels of activity. Debt underwriting fees were $499
million, up 7%. Equity underwriting fees were $518 million, up 94% from the prior year. Fixed
Income Markets revenue was $815 million, up 19% from the prior year. The increase was driven by
record results in rates and currencies, and strong performance in credit trading, emerging markets,
and commodities, as well as gains of $343 million from the widening of the Firms credit spread on
certain structured liabilities. Largely offsetting these results were mortgage-related net
markdowns of $2.6 billion, as well as $1.0 billion of net markdowns on leveraged lending funded and
unfunded commitments. Equity Markets revenue was a record $1.7 billion, up $1.1 billion from the
prior year, driven by strong trading results and client revenue, as well as a gain of $429 million
from the widening of the Firms credit spread on certain structured liabilities. Credit Portfolio
revenue was a loss of $23 million, down $415 million from the prior year, reflecting net markdowns
due to wider counterparty credit spreads and fewer gains from loan workouts, largely offset by
higher net interest income and increased revenue from risk management activities.
The provision for credit losses was $234 million, compared with $227 million in the prior year,
reflecting a weakening credit environment. Net charge-offs were $13 million, compared with $67
million in the prior year. The allowance for loan losses to total average loans retained was 3.85%
for the current quarter, an increase from 1.80% in the prior year.
Average loans retained were $69.0 billion, an increase of $7.1 billion, or 11%, from the prior
year, largely driven by growth in acquisition finance activity, including leveraged lending.
Average fair value and held-for-sale loans were $17.6 billion, up $297 million, or 2%, from the
prior year.
Noninterest expense was $3.8 billion, an increase of $1.4 billion, or 60%, from the prior year,
largely driven by higher compensation expense and additional operating costs relating to the Bear
Stearns merger.
Year-to-date results
Net income was $1.2 billion, down 61%, or $1.8 billion, from the prior year. The lower results
reflected a decline in total net revenue and higher noninterest expense and provision for credit
losses, partially offset by the benefit of reduced deferred tax liabilities.
Total net revenue was $12.5 billion, a decrease of $2.5 billion, or 17%, from the prior year.
Investment banking fees were $4.5 billion, down 9% from the prior year, predominantly reflecting
lower debt underwriting and advisory fees. Debt underwriting fees of $1.7 billion were down 22%,
driven by lower loan syndication and bond underwriting fees, reflecting market conditions. Advisory
fees of $1.4 billion were down 12% from the prior year reflecting decreased levels of activity.
Equity underwriting fees were $1.4 billion, an increase of 21% from the prior year. Fixed Income
Markets revenue was $3.6 billion, down $2.1 billion, or 37%, from the prior year driven largely by
mortgage-related net markdowns of approximately $4.7 billion and net markdowns of $2.8 billion on
leveraged lending funded and unfunded commitments. These markdowns were partially offset by strong
performance in credit trading, commodities, rates, and emerging markets as well as gains of $1.2
billion from the widening of the Firms credit spread on certain structured liabilities. Equity
Markets revenue was $3.7 billion, up $380 million, or 11% from the prior year, driven by strong
trading results and client revenue, as well as a gain of $865 million from the widening of the
Firms credit spread on certain structured liabilities. Credit Portfolio revenue was $649 million,
down $341 million, or 34% from the prior year, reflecting net markdowns due to wider counterparty
credit spreads and fewer gains from loan workouts, largely offset by higher net interest income and
increased revenue from risk management activities.
The provision for credit losses was $1.3 billion, compared with $454 million in the prior year,
primarily reflecting an increase in the allowance for credit losses due to the effect of a
weakening credit environment as well as the effect of the transfer of funded and unfunded leverage
lending commitments to retained loans from held-for-sale. The allowance for loan losses to total
average loans retained was 3.63% compared with 1.85% in the prior year.
Total average loans retained were $73.1 billion, an increase of $13.1 billion, or 22%, from the
prior year, principally driven by growth in acquisition finance activity, including leveraged
lending, as well as liquidity financing. Average fair value and held-for-sale loans were $19.2
billion, up $3.9 billion, or 26%, from the prior year.
Noninterest expense was $11.1 billion, an increase of $1.0 billion, or 10%, from the prior year,
driven by higher noncompensation expense and the Bear Stearns merger.
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected metrics |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except headcount and ratio data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Selected ending balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
$ |
33,000 |
|
|
$ |
21,000 |
|
|
|
57 |
% |
|
$ |
33,000 |
|
|
$ |
21,000 |
|
|
|
57 |
% |
Selected average balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
890,040 |
|
|
$ |
710,665 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
$ |
820,497 |
|
|
$ |
688,730 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Trading assetsdebt and equity instruments |
|
|
360,821 |
|
|
|
372,212 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
365,802 |
|
|
|
355,708 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Trading assetsderivatives receivables |
|
|
105,462 |
|
|
|
63,017 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
98,390 |
|
|
|
59,336 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans retained(a) |
|
|
69,022 |
|
|
|
61,919 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
73,107 |
|
|
|
59,996 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value |
|
|
17,612 |
|
|
|
17,315 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
19,215 |
|
|
|
15,278 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
86,634 |
|
|
|
79,234 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
92,322 |
|
|
|
75,274 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Adjusted assets(b) |
|
|
694,459 |
|
|
|
625,619 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
677,945 |
|
|
|
600,688 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Equity |
|
|
26,000 |
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
23,781 |
|
|
|
21,000 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headcount |
|
|
30,989 |
|
|
|
25,691 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
30,989 |
|
|
|
25,691 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit data and quality statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs (recoveries) |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
Nonperforming assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans(c) |
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
436 |
|
|
|
265 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
Other nonperforming assets |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
Allowance for credit losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
2,654 |
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
2,654 |
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
139 |
|
Allowance for lending-related
commitments |
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
463 |
|
|
|
568 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for credit losses |
|
|
3,117 |
|
|
|
1,680 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
3,117 |
|
|
|
1,680 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-off (recovery) rate(c)(d) |
|
|
0.07 |
% |
|
|
0.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.03 |
% |
|
|
0.10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to average
loans(c)(d) |
|
|
3.85 |
|
|
|
1.80 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.63 |
(i) |
|
|
1.85 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming
loans(c) |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
585 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans to average loans |
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
|
0.33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.47 |
|
|
|
0.35 |
|
|
|
|
|
Market riskaverage trading
and credit portfolio VaR(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By risk type: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income |
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
|
87 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Equities |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Commodities and other |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Diversification(f) |
|
|
(104 |
) |
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
(95 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total trading VaR(g) |
|
|
220 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
162 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
Credit portfolio VaR(h) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
Diversification(f) |
|
|
(49 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(123 |
) |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(144 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total trading and credit portfolio VaR |
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Loans retained included credit portfolio loans, leveraged leases and other accrual loans,
and excluded loans at fair value. |
(b) |
|
Adjusted assets, a non-GAAP financial measure, equals total assets minus (1) securities
purchased under resale agreements and securities borrowed less securities sold, not yet
purchased; (2) assets of variable interest entities (VIEs) consolidated under FIN 46R; (3)
cash and securities segregated and on deposit for regulatory and other purposes; and (4)
goodwill and intangibles. The amount of adjusted assets is presented to assist the reader in
comparing IBs asset and capital levels to other investment banks in the securities industry.
Asset-to-equity leverage ratios are commonly used as one measure to assess a companys capital
adequacy. The IB believes an adjusted asset amount that excludes the assets discussed above,
which were considered to have a low risk profile, provides a more meaningful measure of
balance sheet leverage in the securities industry. |
(c) |
|
Nonperforming loans included loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value of $32 million and
$75 million at September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, which were excluded from the
allowance coverage ratios. Nonperforming loans excluded distressed loans held-for-sale that
were purchased as part of IBs proprietary activities. |
(d) |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value were excluded when calculating the allowance
coverage ratio and net charge-off (recovery) rate. |
(e) |
|
Results for year-to-date 2008 include four months of the combined Firms (JPMorgan Chases
and Bear Stearns) results and five months of heritage JPMorgan Chase results. All prior
periods reflect heritage JPMorgan Chase results. For a more complete description of
value-at-risk (VaR), see pages 8084 of this Form 10-Q. |
24
|
|
|
(f) |
|
Average VaRs were less than the sum of the VaRs of their market risk components, which was
due to risk offsets resulting from portfolio diversification. The diversification effect
reflected the fact that the risks were not perfectly correlated. The risk of a portfolio of
positions is usually less than the sum of the risks of the positions themselves. |
(g) |
|
Trading VaR includes predominantly all trading activities in IB; however, particular risk
parameters of certain products are not fully captured, for example, correlation risk or the
credit spread sensitivity of certain mortgage products. Trading VaR does not include VaR
related to held-for-sale funded loans and unfunded commitments, nor the debit valuation
adjustments (DVA) taken on derivative and structured liabilities to reflect the credit
quality of the Firm. See the DVA Sensitivity table on page 83 of this Form 10-Q for further
details. Trading VaR also does not include the MSR portfolio or VaR related to other corporate
functions, such as Corporate/Private Equity. |
(h) |
|
Included VaR on derivative credit valuation adjustments, hedges of the credit
valuation adjustment and mark-to-market hedges of the retained loan portfolio, which were all
reported in principal transactions revenue. This VaR does not include the retained loan
portfolio. |
(i) |
|
Excluding the impact of a loan originated in March 2008 to Bear Stearns, the adjusted ratio
would be 3.76% for year-to-date 2008. The average balance of the loan extended to Bear Stearns
was $2.6 billion for year-to-date 2008. The allowance for loan losses to period-end loans was
3.70% at September 30, 2008. |
According to Thomson Reuters, for the first nine months of 2008, the Firm was ranked #1 in
Global Debt, Equity and Equity-Related; #1 in Global Equity and Equity-Related; #1 in Global
Syndicated Loans; #1 in Global Long-Term Debt and #3 in Global Announced M&A based upon volume.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
Full Year 2007 |
Market shares and rankings(a) |
|
Market Share |
|
Rankings |
|
Market Share |
|
Rankings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global debt, equity and equity-related |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
#1 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
#2 |
|
Global syndicated loans |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
Global long-term debt(b) |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Global equity and equity-related(c) |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Global announced M&A(d) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
#4 |
|
U.S. debt, equity and equity-related |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
U.S. syndicated loans |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
U.S. long-term debt(b) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
#2 |
|
U.S. equity and equity-related(c) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
#1 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
#5 |
|
U.S. announced M&A(d) |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
#3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Source: Thomson Reuters. The results for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, are
pro forma for the merger with Bear Stearns. Full-year 2007 results represent heritage JPMorgan
Chase only. |
(b) |
|
Includes asset-backed securities, mortgage-backed securities and municipal securities. |
(c) |
|
Includes rights offerings; U.S. domiciled equity and equity-related transactions. |
(d) |
|
Global announced M&A is based upon rank value; all other rankings are based upon proceeds,
with full credit to each book manager/equal if joint. Because of joint assignments, market
share of all participants will add up to more than 100%. Global and U.S. announced M&A market
share and rankings for 2007 included transactions withdrawn since December 31, 2007. U.S.
announced M&A represents any U.S. involvement ranking. |
25
RETAIL FINANCIAL SERVICES
For a discussion of the business profile of RFS, see pages 4348 of JPMorgan Chases 2007
Annual Report and page 5 of this Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement data |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lending & deposit-related fees |
|
$ |
538 |
|
|
$ |
492 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
$ |
1,496 |
|
|
$ |
1,385 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Asset management, administration and
commissions |
|
|
346 |
|
|
|
336 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,098 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Mortgage fees and related income |
|
|
437 |
|
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
1,658 |
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Credit card income |
|
|
204 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Other income |
|
|
206 |
|
|
|
296 |
|
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
558 |
|
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
1,731 |
|
|
|
1,520 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
5,382 |
|
|
|
4,693 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
3,144 |
|
|
|
2,681 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
9,210 |
|
|
|
7,971 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
4,875 |
|
|
|
4,201 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
14,592 |
|
|
|
12,664 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
5,502 |
|
|
|
1,559 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
1,120 |
|
|
|
1,087 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3,464 |
|
|
|
3,256 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Noncompensation expense |
|
|
1,552 |
|
|
|
1,265 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
4,248 |
|
|
|
3,753 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
2,772 |
|
|
|
2,469 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
8,012 |
|
|
|
7,360 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
3,745 |
|
|
|
(71 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
247 |
|
|
$ |
639 |
|
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
$ |
626 |
|
|
$ |
2,283 |
|
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Overhead ratio |
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
Overhead ratio excluding core deposit
intangibles(a) |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Retail Financial Services uses the overhead ratio (excluding the amortization of core
deposit intangibles (CDI)), a non-GAAP financial measure, to evaluate the underlying expense
trends of the business. Including CDI amortization expense in the overhead ratio calculation
results in a higher overhead ratio in the earlier years and a lower overhead ratio in later
years; this method would result in an improving overhead ratio over time, all things remaining
equal. This ratio excludes Regional Bankings core deposit intangible amortization expense
related to The Bank of New York transaction and the Bank One merger of $99 million and $116
million for the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $297 million and
$347 million for year-to-date September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
Quarterly results
Net income was $247 million, a decrease of $392 million, or 61%, reflecting a significant increase
in the provision for credit losses in Regional Banking and higher noninterest expense in Mortgage
Banking. These factors were offset partially by revenue growth in all businesses.
Net revenue was $4.9 billion, an increase of $674 million, or 16%, from the prior year. Net
interest income was $3.1 billion, up $463 million, or 17%, due to higher loan and deposit balances
and wider deposit spreads. Noninterest revenue was $1.7 billion, up $211 million, or 14%, as higher
net mortgage servicing revenue and increased deposit-related fees were offset partially by declines
in education loan sales.
The provision for credit losses was $1.7 billion, as housing price declines have continued to
result in significant increases in estimated losses, particularly for high loan-to-value home
equity and mortgage loans. Home equity net charge-offs were $663 million (2.78% net charge-off
rate), compared with $150 million (0.65% net charge-off rate) in the prior year. Subprime mortgage
net charge-offs were $273 million (7.65% net charge-off rate), compared with $40 million (1.62% net
charge-off rate) in the prior year. Prime mortgage net charge-offs (including net charge-offs
reflected in the Corporate segment) were $177 million (1.51% net charge-off rate), compared with $9
million (0.11% net charge-off rate) in the prior year. The current-quarter provision includes an
increase in the allowance for loan losses of $450 million due to increases in estimated losses in
the subprime and home equity mortgage portfolios. An additional $250 million increase in the
allowance for loan losses for prime mortgage loans has been reflected in the Corporate segment.
26
Noninterest expense was $2.8 billion, an increase of $303 million, or 12%, from the prior year,
reflecting higher mortgage reinsurance losses and increased servicing expense.
Year-to-date results
Net income was $626 million, a decrease of $1.7 billion, or 73%, reflecting a significant increase
in the provision for credit losses in Regional Banking and higher noninterest expense in Mortgage
Banking. These factors were offset partially by revenue growth in all businesses.
Net revenue was $14.6 billion, an increase of $1.9 billion, or 15%, from the prior year. Net
interest income was $9.2 billion, up $1.2 billion, or 16%, due to higher loan and deposit balances
and wider loan and deposit spreads. Noninterest revenue was $5.4 billion, up $689 million, or 15%,
as higher mortgage banking revenue and increased deposit-related fees were offset partially by
declines in education loan sales.
The provision for credit losses was $5.5 billion, as housing price declines have continued to
result in significant increases in estimated losses, particularly for high loan-to-value home
equity and mortgage loans. Home equity net charge-offs were $1.6 billion (2.28% net charge-off
rate), compared with $316 million (0.47% net charge-off rate) in the prior year. Subprime mortgage
net charge-offs were $614 million (5.43% net charge-off rate), compared with $86 million (1.28% net
charge-off rate) in the prior year. Prime mortgage net charge-offs (including net charge-offs
reflected in the Corporate segment) were $331 million (0.98% net charge-off rate), compared with
$16 million (0.07% net charge-off rate) in the prior year. The year-to-date provision includes
increases in the allowance for loan losses of $1.2 billion for home equity loans and $1.3 billion
for prime and subprime mortgage loans due to increases in estimated losses for these portfolios. An
additional $580 million increase in the allowance for loan losses for prime mortgage loans has been
reflected in the Corporate segment.
Noninterest expense was $8.0 billion, an increase of $652 million, or 9%, from the prior year,
reflecting higher mortgage reinsurance losses, increased servicing expense and investment in the
retail distribution network.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected metrics |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except headcount and ratios) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Selected ending balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
$ |
228,982 |
|
|
$ |
216,754 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
$ |
228,982 |
|
|
$ |
216,754 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans retained |
|
|
187,548 |
|
|
|
172,498 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
187,548 |
|
|
|
172,498 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at
fair value(a) |
|
|
9,655 |
|
|
|
18,274 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
9,655 |
|
|
|
18,274 |
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
197,203 |
|
|
|
190,772 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
197,203 |
|
|
|
190,772 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
222,574 |
|
|
|
216,135 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
222,574 |
|
|
|
216,135 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Equity |
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
25,000 |
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected average balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
$ |
230,428 |
|
|
$ |
214,852 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
230,239 |
|
|
$ |
216,218 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans retained |
|
|
187,429 |
|
|
|
168,495 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
185,222 |
|
|
|
165,479 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at
fair value(a) |
|
|
16,037 |
|
|
|
19,560 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
18,116 |
|
|
|
24,289 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
203,466 |
|
|
|
188,055 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
203,338 |
|
|
|
189,768 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
222,180 |
|
|
|
216,904 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
224,731 |
|
|
|
217,669 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Equity |
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
16,000 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headcount |
|
|
67,265 |
|
|
|
68,528 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
67,265 |
|
|
|
68,528 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit data and quality statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
$ |
1,196 |
|
|
$ |
350 |
|
|
|
242 |
|
|
$ |
2,926 |
|
|
$ |
805 |
|
|
|
263 |
|
Nonperforming loans(b)(c)(d) |
|
|
4,443 |
|
|
|
1,820 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
4,443 |
|
|
|
1,820 |
|
|
|
144 |
|
Nonperforming assets(b)(c)(d) |
|
|
5,131 |
|
|
|
2,232 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
5,131 |
|
|
|
2,232 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
4,957 |
|
|
|
2,105 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
4,957 |
|
|
|
2,105 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-off rate(e)(f) |
|
|
2.44 |
% |
|
|
0.82 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.05 |
% |
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to ending
loans(e) |
|
|
2.64 |
|
|
|
1.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.64 |
|
|
|
1.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to
nonperforming loans(e) |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans to total loans |
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.25 |
|
|
|
0.95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value included prime mortgage loans originated
with the intent to sell, which were accounted for at fair value. These loans, classified as
trading assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, totaled $8.1 billion and $14.4 billion at
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Average loans included prime mortgage loans,
classified as trading assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, of $14.5 billion and $14.1
billion for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $14.9
billion and $11.4 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. |
(b) |
|
Nonperforming loans and assets included loans held-for-sale and loans accounted for at fair
value of $207 million and $17 million at September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Certain
of these loans are classified as trading assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
(c) |
|
Nonperforming loans and assets excluded (1) loans eligible for repurchase as well as loans
repurchased from Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA) pools that are insured by
U.S. government agencies of $1.8 billion and $1.3 billion at September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, and (2) education loans that are 90 days past due and still accruing, which
are insured by U.S. government agencies under the Federal Family Education Loan Program of
$405 million and $241 million at September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These amounts
were excluded, as reimbursement is proceeding normally. |
(d) |
|
During the second quarter of 2008, the policy for classifying subprime mortgage and home
equity loans as nonperforming was changed to conform to all other home lending products.
Prior period nonperforming assets have been revised to conform to this change. |
(e) |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans accounted for at fair value were excluded when calculating
the allowance coverage ratio and net charge-off rate. |
(f) |
|
The net charge-off rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, excluded
$45 million and $78 million, respectively, of charge-offs related to prime mortgage loans
held by the Corporate/Private Equity segment. |
REGIONAL BANKING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement data |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
$ |
1,049 |
|
|
$ |
1,013 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
$ |
2,949 |
|
|
$ |
2,783 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Net interest income |
|
|
2,652 |
|
|
|
2,325 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
7,766 |
|
|
|
6,920 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
3,701 |
|
|
|
3,338 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
10,715 |
|
|
|
9,703 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
1,552 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
5,089 |
|
|
|
1,301 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
1,773 |
|
|
|
1,760 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
5,345 |
|
|
|
5,238 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
1,004 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
281 |
|
|
|
3,164 |
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
Net income |
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
611 |
|
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
$ |
1,930 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Overhead ratio |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
|
|
Overhead ratio excluding core deposit
intangibles(a) |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Regional Banking uses the overhead ratio (excluding the amortization of core deposit
intangibles (CDI)), a non-GAAP financial measure, to evaluate the underlying expense trends
of the business. Including CDI amortization expense in the overhead ratio calculation results
in a higher overhead ratio in the earlier years and a lower overhead ratio in later years;
this inclusion would result in an improving overhead ratio over time, all things remaining
equal. This ratio excludes Regional Bankings core deposit intangible amortization expense
related to The Bank of New York transaction and the Bank One merger of $99 million and $116
million for the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $297 million and
$347 million for year-to-date 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
Quarterly results
Regional Banking net income was $218 million, down $393 million, or 64%, from the prior year. Net
revenue was $3.7 billion, up $363 million, or 11%, as the benefits of higher loan and deposit
balances, wider deposit spreads and higher deposit-related fees were offset partially by declines
in education loan sales. The provision for credit losses was $1.6 billion, compared with $574
million in the prior year. The provision reflected weakness in the home equity and mortgage
portfolios (see Retail Financial Services discussion of the provision for credit losses for further
detail). Noninterest expense was $1.8 billion, up $13 million, or 1%, from the prior year.
Year-to-date results
Regional Banking net income was $139 million, down $1.8 billion, or 93%, from the prior year. Net
revenue was $10.7 billion, up $1.0 billion, or 10%, as the benefits of higher loan and deposit
balances, wider loan and deposit spreads and higher deposit-related fees were offset partially by
declines in education loan sales. The provision for credit losses was $5.1 billion, compared with
$1.3 billion in the prior year. The provision reflected weakness in the home equity and mortgage
portfolios (see Retail Financial Services discussion of the provision for credit losses for further
detail). Noninterest expense was $5.3 billion, up $107 million, or 2%, from the prior year, due to
investment in the retail distribution network.
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected metrics |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in billions, except ratios and where otherwise noted) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Business metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity origination volume |
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
11.2 |
|
|
|
(77 |
)% |
|
$ |
14.6 |
|
|
$ |
38.5 |
|
|
|
(62 |
)% |
End-of-period loans owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
$ |
94.6 |
|
|
$ |
93.0 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
$ |
94.6 |
|
|
$ |
93.0 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Mortgage(a) |
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
13.6 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Business banking |
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Education |
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Other loans(b) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total end of period loans |
|
|
141.0 |
|
|
|
132.8 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
141.0 |
|
|
|
132.8 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
End-of-period deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Checking |
|
$ |
69.0 |
|
|
$ |
64.5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
69.0 |
|
|
$ |
64.5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Savings |
|
|
105.0 |
|
|
|
95.7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
105.0 |
|
|
|
95.7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Time and other |
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
|
46.5 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
37.5 |
|
|
|
46.5 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total end of period deposits |
|
|
211.5 |
|
|
|
206.7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
211.5 |
|
|
|
206.7 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Average loans owned |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
$ |
94.8 |
|
|
$ |
91.8 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
$ |
95.0 |
|
|
$ |
89.1 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Mortgage(a) |
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
9.9 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
Business banking |
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
16.1 |
|
|
|
14.5 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Education |
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Other loans(b) |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total average loans(c) |
|
|
140.6 |
|
|
|
128.7 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
140.4 |
|
|
|
125.8 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Average deposits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Checking |
|
$ |
68.0 |
|
|
$ |
64.9 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
63.4 |
|
|
$ |
66.5 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Savings |
|
|
105.5 |
|
|
|
97.1 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
103.9 |
|
|
|
97.4 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Time and other |
|
|
36.7 |
|
|
|
43.3 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
45.5 |
|
|
|
42.5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total average deposits |
|
|
210.2 |
|
|
|
205.3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
212.8 |
|
|
|
206.4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Average assets |
|
|
148.7 |
|
|
|
140.6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
149.3 |
|
|
|
138.1 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Average equity |
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
12.4 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit
data and quality statistics (in millions,
except ratios) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30+ day delinquency rate(d)(e) |
|
|
4.18 |
% |
|
|
2.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.18 |
% |
|
|
2.39 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
$ |
663 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
$ |
1,621 |
|
|
$ |
316 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
Mortgage |
|
|
318 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
692 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
Business banking |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net charge-offs |
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
335 |
|
|
|
2,562 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
343 |
|
Net charge-off rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
2.78 |
% |
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.28 |
% |
|
|
0.47 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Mortgage(f) |
|
|
7.59 |
|
|
|
1.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.40 |
|
|
|
1.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Business banking |
|
|
1.33 |
|
|
|
0.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other loans |
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
1.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net charge-off rate(c)(f) |
|
|
2.92 |
|
|
|
0.78 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.41 |
|
|
|
0.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets(g)(h) |
|
$ |
4,310 |
|
|
$ |
2,034 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
$ |
4,310 |
|
|
$ |
2,034 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Balance reported predominantly reflected subprime mortgage loans owned. |
(b) |
|
Included commercial loans derived from community development activities prior to March 31,
2008. |
(c) |
|
Average loans include loans held-for-sale of $1.2 billion and $3.2 billion for the quarters
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $2.8 billion and $3.8 billion for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These amounts were excluded when
calculating the net charge-off rate. |
(d) |
|
Excluded loans eligible for repurchase as well as loans repurchased from GNMA pools that are
insured by U.S. government agencies of $2.0 billion and $979 million at September 30, 2008 and
2007, respectively. These amounts are excluded as reimbursement is proceeding normally. |
(e) |
|
Excluded loans that are 30 days past due and still accruing, which are insured by U.S.
government agencies under the Federal Family Education Loan Program of $787 million and $590
million at September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These amounts are excluded as
reimbursement is proceeding normally. |
(f) |
|
The mortgage and total net charge-off rate for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, excluded $45 million and $78 million, respectively, of charge-offs related to prime
mortgage loans held by the Corporate/Private Equity segment. |
29
|
|
|
(g) |
|
Excluded (1) loans eligible for repurchase as well as loans repurchased from GNMA pools that
are insured by U.S. government agencies of $1.8 billion and $1.3 billion at September 30, 2008
and 2007, respectively, and (2) education loans that are 90 days past due and still accruing,
which are insured by U.S. government agencies under the Federal Family Education Loan Program
of $405 million and $241 million at September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These amounts
for GNMA and education loans are excluded, as reimbursement is proceeding normally. |
(h) |
|
During the second quarter of 2008, the policy for classifying subprime mortgage and home
equity loans as nonperforming was changed to conform to all other home lending products. Prior
period nonperforming assets have been revised to conform to this change. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail branch business metrics |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except where otherwise noted) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Investment sales volume |
|
$ |
4,389 |
|
|
$ |
4,346 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
$ |
13,684 |
|
|
$ |
14,246 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Branches |
|
|
3,179 |
|
|
|
3,096 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3,179 |
|
|
|
3,096 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
ATMs |
|
|
9,308 |
|
|
|
8,943 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
9,308 |
|
|
|
8,943 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Personal bankers |
|
|
10,201 |
|
|
|
9,503 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
10,201 |
|
|
|
9,503 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Sales specialists |
|
|
3,959 |
|
|
|
4,025 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
3,959 |
|
|
|
4,025 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Active online customers (in thousands) |
|
|
7,315 |
|
|
|
5,706 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
7,315 |
|
|
|
5,706 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Checking accounts (in thousands) |
|
|
11,672 |
|
|
|
10,644 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
11,672 |
|
|
|
10,644 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
MORTGAGE BANKING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except ratios and where |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
otherwise noted) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Production revenue |
|
$ |
254 |
|
|
$ |
176 |
|
|
|
44 |
% |
|
$ |
1,427 |
|
|
$ |
1,039 |
|
|
|
37 |
% |
Net mortgage servicing revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servicing revenue |
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
2,007 |
|
|
|
1,845 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Changes in MSR asset fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due to inputs or assumptions in model |
|
|
(786 |
) |
|
|
(810 |
) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
Other changes in fair value |
|
|
(390 |
) |
|
|
(377 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(1,209 |
) |
|
|
(1,138 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total changes in MSR asset fair value |
|
|
(1,176 |
) |
|
|
(1,187 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(1,108 |
) |
|
|
(888 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
Derivative valuation adjustments and other |
|
|
893 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(353 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net mortgage servicing revenue |
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
230 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
912 |
|
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
2,339 |
|
|
|
1,643 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
747 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
1,932 |
|
|
|
1,469 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense |
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(50 |
) |
|
$ |
(48 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE |
|
|
(8 |
)% |
|
|
(10 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business metrics (in billions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third-party mortgage loans serviced
(ending) |
|
$ |
681.8 |
|
|
$ |
600.0 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
$ |
681.8 |
|
|
$ |
600.0 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
MSR net carrying value (ending) |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Average mortgage loans held-for-sale(a) |
|
|
14.9 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
20.4 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
Average assets |
|
|
35.4 |
|
|
|
31.4 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
35.0 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Average equity |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage origination volume by channel
(in billions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retail |
|
$ |
8.4 |
|
|
$ |
11.1 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
$ |
33.5 |
|
|
$ |
35.6 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
Wholesale |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
25.6 |
|
|
|
32.5 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
Correspondent |
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
42.2 |
|
|
|
18.4 |
|
|
|
129 |
|
CNT (Negotiated transactions) |
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
39.6 |
|
|
|
32.9 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
37.7 |
|
|
$ |
39.2 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
140.9 |
|
|
$ |
119.4 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included $14.5 billion and $14.1 billion of prime mortgage loans at fair value for the
three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $14.9 billion and
$11.4 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. These loans are
classified as trading assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
30
Quarterly results
Mortgage Banking reported a net loss of $50 million, compared with a net loss of $48 million in the
prior year. Net revenue was $666 million, up $260 million, or 64%. Net revenue comprises production
revenue and net mortgage servicing revenue. Production revenue was $254 million, up $78 million,
reflecting lower markdowns of $91 million on the mortgage warehouse and pipeline as compared with
markdowns of $186 million in the prior year. The current-year result was also affected by an
increase in reserves related to the repurchase of previously sold loans. Net mortgage servicing
revenue which includes loan servicing revenue, MSR risk management results and other changes in
fair value was $412 million, an increase of $182 million, or 79%, from the prior year. Loan
servicing revenue was $695 million, an increase of $66 million on growth of 14% in third-party
loans serviced. MSR risk management results were $107 million, compared with negative $22 million
in the prior year. Other changes in fair value of the MSR asset were negative $390 million compared
with negative $377 million in the prior year. Noninterest expense was $747 million, an increase of
$262 million, or 54%. The increase reflected higher mortgage reinsurance losses and higher
servicing costs due to increased delinquencies and defaults.
Year-to-date results
Mortgage Banking net income was $251 million, compared with $107 million in the prior year. Net
revenue was $2.3 billion, up $696 million, or 42%. Net revenue comprises production revenue and net
mortgage servicing revenue. Production revenue was $1.4 billion, up $388 million, benefiting from
higher loan originations and lower markdowns on the mortgage warehouse and pipeline as compared
with the prior year. The current-year result was also affected by an increase in reserves related
to the repurchase of previously sold loans. Net mortgage servicing revenue which includes loan
servicing revenue, MSR risk management results and other changes in fair value was $912 million,
an increase of $308 million, or 51%, from the prior year. Loan servicing revenue was $2.0 billion,
an increase of $162 million on growth of 14% in third-party loans serviced. MSR risk management
results were $114 million, compared with negative $103 million in the prior year. Other changes in
fair value of the MSR asset were negative $1.2 billion compared with negative $1.1 billion in the
prior year. Noninterest expense was $1.9 billion, an increase of $463 million, or 32%. The increase
reflected higher mortgage reinsurance losses and higher servicing costs due to increased
delinquencies and defaults.
31
AUTO FINANCE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except ratios and where |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
otherwise noted) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
$ |
463 |
|
|
$ |
409 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
Net interest income |
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1,071 |
|
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
506 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
1,534 |
|
|
|
1,307 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
252 |
|
|
|
224 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
735 |
|
|
|
653 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
407 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Net income |
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
236 |
|
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
ROA |
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.68 |
|
|
|
0.76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business metrics (in billions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto origination volume |
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
$ |
16.6 |
|
|
$ |
15.7 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
End-of-period loans and lease-related
assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans outstanding |
|
$ |
43.2 |
|
|
$ |
40.3 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
43.2 |
|
|
$ |
40.3 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Lease financing receivables |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
(83 |
) |
Operating lease assets |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total end-of-period loans and
lease-related assets |
|
|
45.5 |
|
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
45.5 |
|
|
|
42.7 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Average loans and lease-related assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans outstanding |
|
$ |
43.8 |
|
|
$ |
39.9 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
43.8 |
|
|
$ |
39.8 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Lease financing receivables |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
(86 |
) |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(82 |
) |
Operating lease assets |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total average loans and
lease-related assets |
|
|
46.1 |
|
|
|
42.4 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
46.1 |
|
|
|
42.6 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Average assets |
|
|
46.4 |
|
|
|
42.9 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
46.4 |
|
|
|
43.1 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Average equity |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit quality statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30+ day delinquency rate |
|
|
1.82 |
% |
|
|
1.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.82 |
% |
|
|
1.65 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
$ |
358 |
|
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Lease receivables |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net charge-offs |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
Net charge-off rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
1.12 |
% |
|
|
0.97 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.09 |
% |
|
|
0.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Lease receivables |
|
|
3.98 |
|
|
|
0.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.00 |
|
|
|
0.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net charge-off rate |
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
0.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming assets |
|
$ |
239 |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
$ |
239 |
|
|
$ |
156 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
Quarterly results
Auto Finance net income was $79 million, an increase of $3 million, or 4%, from the prior year. Net
revenue was $506 million, up $59 million, or 13%, driven by higher loan balances and increased
automobile operating lease revenue. The provision for credit losses was $124 million, up $28
million, reflecting higher estimated losses. The net charge-off rate was 1.12%, compared with 0.97%
in the prior year. Noninterest expense was $252 million, an increase of $28 million, or 13%, driven
by increased depreciation expense on owned automobiles subject to operating leases.
Year-to-date results
Auto Finance net income was $236 million, a decrease of $10 million, or 4%, from the prior year.
Net revenue was $1.5 billion, up $227 million, or 17%, driven by increased automobile operating
lease revenue, higher loan balances, and a reduction in residual value reserves for direct finance
leases. The provision for credit losses was $409 million, up $162 million, reflecting higher
estimated losses. The net charge-off rate was 1.10%, compared with 0.72% in the prior year.
Noninterest expense was $735 million, an increase of $82 million, or 13%, driven by increased
depreciation expense on owned automobiles subject to operating leases.
32
CARD SERVICES
For a discussion of the business profile of CS, see pages 4951 of JPMorgan Chases 2007
Annual Report and pages 56 of this Form 10-Q.
JPMorgan Chase uses the concept of managed basis to evaluate the credit performance of its credit
card loans, both loans on the balance sheet and loans that have been securitized. For further
information, see Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firms Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on
pages 1720 of this Form 10-Q. Managed results exclude the impact of credit card securitizations
on total net revenue, the provision for credit losses, net charge-offs and loan receivables.
Securitization does not change reported net income; however, it does affect the classification of
items on the Consolidated Statements of Income and Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement data managed-basis |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card income |
|
$ |
633 |
|
|
$ |
692 |
|
|
|
(9 |
)% |
|
$ |
1,906 |
|
|
$ |
1,973 |
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
All other income |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
(81 |
) |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
759 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
2,129 |
|
|
|
2,212 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
Net interest income |
|
|
3,241 |
|
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
9,437 |
|
|
|
9,052 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
3,887 |
|
|
|
3,867 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
11,566 |
|
|
|
11,264 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
2,229 |
|
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
6,093 |
|
|
|
3,923 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
792 |
|
|
|
761 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Noncompensation expense |
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
827 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
2,377 |
|
|
|
2,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
482 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
3,651 |
|
|
|
3,691 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
|
1,822 |
|
|
|
3,650 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
(62 |
) |
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
292 |
|
|
$ |
786 |
|
|
|
(63 |
) |
|
$ |
1,151 |
|
|
$ |
2,310 |
|
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memo: Net securitization gains
(amortization) |
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Overhead ratio |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterly results
Net income was $292 million, a decline of $494 million, or 63%, from the prior year. The decrease
was driven by a higher provision for credit losses, partially offset by lower noninterest expense.
End-of-period managed loans were $159.3 billion, an increase of $10.3 billion, or 7%, from the
prior year. Average managed loans were $157.6 billion, an increase of $8.9 billion, or 6%, from the
prior year. The increase in both end-of-period and average managed loans reflects organic portfolio
growth.
Managed total net revenue was $3.9 billion, an increase of $20 million, or 1%, from the prior year.
Net interest income was $3.2 billion, up $133 million, or 4%, from the prior year, driven by higher
average managed loan balances and wider loan spreads. These benefits were offset partially by the
effect of higher revenue reversals associated with higher charge-offs. Noninterest revenue was $646
million, a decrease of $113 million, or 15%, from the prior year. Interchange income increased,
benefiting from a 5% increase in charge volume, but was more than offset by increased rewards
expense and higher volume-driven payments to partners (both of which are netted against interchange
income), as well as a decrease in securitization income.
The managed provision for credit losses was $2.2 billion, an increase of $866 million, or 64%, from
the prior year, due to a higher level of charge-offs and an increase of $250 million in the
allowance for loan losses, reflecting higher estimated losses. The managed net charge-off rate for
the quarter was 5.00%, up from 3.64% in the prior year. The 30-day managed delinquency rate was
3.69%, up from 3.25% in the prior year.
Noninterest expense was $1.2 billion, a decrease of $68 million, or 5%, from the prior year due to
lower marketing expense.
33
Year-to-date results
Net income was $1.2 billion, a decline of $1.2 billion, or 50%, from the prior year. The decrease
was driven by a higher provision for credit losses, partially offset by higher net revenue.
Average managed loans were $154.7 billion, an increase of $6.2 billion, or 4%, from the prior year,
reflecting organic portfolio growth.
Managed total net revenue was $11.6 billion, an increase of $302 million, or 3%, from the prior
year. Net interest income was $9.4 billion, up $385 million, or 4%, from the prior year, driven by
higher average managed loan balances, wider loan spreads and an increased level of fees. These
benefits were offset partially by the effect of higher revenue reversals associated with higher
charge-offs. Noninterest revenue was $2.1 billion, a decrease of $83 million, or 4%, from the prior
year. Interchange income increased, benefiting from a 5% increase in charge volume, but was more
than offset by increased rewards expense and higher volume-driven payments to partners (both of
which are netted against interchange income).
The managed provision for credit losses was $6.1 billion, an increase of $2.2 billion, or 55%, from
the prior year, due to a higher level of charge-offs and an increase in the allowance for loan
losses (an increase of $550 million compared with a prior year release of $85 million), reflecting
higher estimated losses. The managed net charge-off rate increased to 4.79%, up from 3.61% in the
prior year.
Noninterest expense was $3.7 billion, a decrease of $40 million, or 1%, from the prior year.
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except headcount, ratios |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
and where otherwise noted) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Financial metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of average managed outstandings: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
8.18 |
% |
|
|
8.29 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.15 |
% |
|
|
8.15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
5.63 |
|
|
|
3.64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.26 |
|
|
|
3.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
1.63 |
|
|
|
2.03 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.84 |
|
|
|
1.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
Risk adjusted margin(a) |
|
|
4.19 |
|
|
|
6.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.73 |
|
|
|
6.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
3.01 |
|
|
|
3.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.15 |
|
|
|
3.32 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax income (ROO)(b) |
|
|
1.17 |
|
|
|
3.31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.57 |
|
|
|
3.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
0.74 |
|
|
|
2.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
2.08 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge volume (in billions) |
|
$ |
93.9 |
|
|
$ |
89.8 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
$ |
272.9 |
|
|
$ |
259.1 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Net accounts opened (in millions) |
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
Credit cards issued (in millions) |
|
|
156.9 |
|
|
|
153.6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
156.9 |
|
|
|
153.6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Number of registered internet customers
(in millions) |
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
27.5 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Merchant acquiring business(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank card volume (in billions) |
|
$ |
197.1 |
|
|
$ |
181.4 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
$ |
578.8 |
|
|
$ |
524.7 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Total transactions (in billions) |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Selected ending balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans on balance sheets |
|
$ |
77,565 |
|
|
$ |
79,409 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
77,565 |
|
|
$ |
79,409 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Securitized loans |
|
|
81,745 |
|
|
|
69,643 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
81,745 |
|
|
|
69,643 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Managed loans |
|
$ |
159,310 |
|
|
$ |
149,052 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
159,310 |
|
|
$ |
149,052 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
14,100 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
$ |
15,000 |
|
|
$ |
14,100 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Selected average balances |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managed assets |
|
$ |
169,413 |
|
|
$ |
154,956 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
$ |
163,560 |
|
|
$ |
155,206 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans on balance sheets |
|
$ |
79,183 |
|
|
$ |
79,993 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
78,090 |
|
|
$ |
80,301 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Securitized loans |
|
|
78,371 |
|
|
|
68,673 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
76,564 |
|
|
|
68,200 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
Managed average loans |
|
$ |
157,554 |
|
|
$ |
148,666 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
$ |
154,654 |
|
|
$ |
148,501 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
$ |
14,100 |
|
|
$ |
14,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
14,100 |
|
|
$ |
14,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headcount |
|
|
19,722 |
|
|
|
18,887 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
19,722 |
|
|
|
18,887 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Managed credit quality statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
$ |
1,979 |
|
|
$ |
1,363 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
$ |
5,543 |
|
|
$ |
4,008 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
Net charge-off rate |
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
3.64 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.79 |
% |
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Managed delinquency ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30+ days |
|
|
3.69 |
% |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.69 |
% |
|
|
3.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
90+ days |
|
|
1.74 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.74 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses(d) |
|
$ |
3,951 |
|
|
$ |
3,107 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
$ |
3,951 |
|
|
$ |
3,107 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to period-end
loans(d) |
|
|
5.09 |
% |
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.09 |
% |
|
|
3.91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents total net revenue less provision for credit losses. |
(b) |
|
Pretax return on average managed outstandings. |
(c) |
|
Represents 100% of the merchant acquiring business. |
(d) |
|
Loans on a reported basis. |
35
Reconciliation from reported basis to managed basis
The financial information presented below reconciles reported basis and managed basis to
disclose the effect of securitizations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Income statement data(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
$ |
1,476 |
|
|
$ |
1,528 |
|
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
$ |
4,529 |
|
|
$ |
4,343 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
Securitization adjustments |
|
|
(843 |
) |
|
|
(836 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2,623 |
) |
|
|
(2,370 |
) |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Managed credit card income |
|
$ |
633 |
|
|
$ |
692 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
1,906 |
|
|
$ |
1,973 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
$ |
1,525 |
|
|
$ |
1,694 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
$ |
4,430 |
|
|
$ |
4,921 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Securitization adjustments |
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
5,007 |
|
|
|
4,131 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
Managed net interest income |
|
$ |
3,241 |
|
|
$ |
3,108 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
9,437 |
|
|
$ |
9,052 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
$ |
3,014 |
|
|
$ |
3,289 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
9,182 |
|
|
$ |
9,503 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
Securitization adjustments |
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
Managed total net revenue |
|
$ |
3,887 |
|
|
$ |
3,867 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
11,566 |
|
|
$ |
11,264 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
$ |
1,356 |
|
|
$ |
785 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
$ |
3,709 |
|
|
$ |
2,162 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
Securitization adjustments |
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
Managed provision for credit losses |
|
$ |
2,229 |
|
|
$ |
1,363 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
$ |
6,093 |
|
|
$ |
3,923 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet average balances(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total average assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
$ |
93,701 |
|
|
$ |
88,856 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
$ |
89,594 |
|
|
$ |
89,491 |
|
|
|
|
|
Securitization adjustments |
|
|
75,712 |
|
|
|
66,100 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
73,966 |
|
|
|
65,715 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Managed average assets |
|
$ |
169,413 |
|
|
$ |
154,956 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
$ |
163,560 |
|
|
$ |
155,206 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Credit quality statistics(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported |
|
$ |
1,106 |
|
|
$ |
785 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
$ |
3,159 |
|
|
$ |
2,247 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
Securitization adjustments |
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
Managed net charge-offs |
|
$ |
1,979 |
|
|
$ |
1,363 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
$ |
5,543 |
|
|
$ |
4,008 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
JPMorgan Chase uses the concept of managed basis to evaluate the credit performance
and overall performance of the underlying credit card loans, both sold and not sold; as the
same borrower is continuing to use the credit card for ongoing charges, a borrowers credit
performance will affect both the receivables sold under SFAS 140 and those not sold. Thus, in
its disclosures regarding managed receivables, JPMorgan Chase treats the sold receivables as
if they were still on the balance sheet in order to disclose the credit performance (such as
net charge-off rates) of the entire managed credit card portfolio. Managed results exclude
the impact of credit card securitizations on total net revenue, the provision for credit
losses, net charge-offs and loan receivables. Securitization does not change reported net
income versus managed earnings; however, it does affect the classification of items on the
Consolidated Statements of Income and Consolidated Balance Sheets. For further information,
see Explanation and Reconciliation of the Firms Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures on pages
1720 of this Form 10-Q. |
36
COMMERCIAL BANKING
For a discussion of the business profile of CB, see pages 5253 of JPMorgan Chases 2007
Annual Report and page 6 of this Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement data |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lending & deposit-related fees |
|
$ |
212 |
|
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
$ |
612 |
|
|
$ |
475 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
Asset management, administration
and
commissions |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
All other income(a) |
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
394 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
388 |
|
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
1,105 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2,193 |
|
|
|
2,082 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
1,125 |
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
3,298 |
|
|
|
3,019 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
522 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Noncompensation expense |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
890 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
1,577 |
|
|
|
1,391 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
312 |
|
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
$ |
959 |
|
|
$ |
846 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue by product: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lending |
|
$ |
377 |
|
|
$ |
343 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
$ |
1,132 |
|
|
$ |
1,039 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Treasury services |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1,889 |
|
|
|
1,719 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Investment banking |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Other |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial Banking revenue |
|
$ |
1,125 |
|
|
$ |
1,009 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
3,298 |
|
|
$ |
3,019 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
IB revenue, gross(b) |
|
$ |
252 |
|
|
$ |
194 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
$ |
725 |
|
|
$ |
661 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue by business: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle Market Banking |
|
$ |
729 |
|
|
$ |
680 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
$ |
2,143 |
|
|
$ |
1,994 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Mid-Corporate Banking |
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
167 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
678 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Real Estate Banking |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
319 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Other |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
130 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial Banking revenue |
|
$ |
1,125 |
|
|
$ |
1,009 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
3,298 |
|
|
$ |
3,019 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Overhead ratio |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
IB-related and commercial card revenue is included in all other income. |
(b) |
|
Represents the total revenue related to investment banking products sold to CB clients. |
37
Quarterly results
Net income was $312 million, an increase of $54 million, or 21%, from the prior year, driven by
record net revenue, partially offset by an increase in the provision for credit losses and higher
noninterest expense.
Net revenue was $1.1 billion, an increase of $116 million, or 11%, from the prior year. Net
interest income was $737 million, up $18 million, or 3%, driven by double-digit growth in loan and
liability balances, predominantly offset by spread compression in the liability and loan
portfolios. Noninterest revenue was $388 million, an increase of $98 million, or 34%, from the
prior year, reflecting higher deposit-related fees, investment banking fees, and other income.
Middle Market Banking revenue was $729 million, an increase of $49 million, or 7%, from the prior
year. Mid-Corporate Banking revenue was $236 million, an increase of $69 million, or 41%. Real
Estate Banking revenue was $91 million, a decline of $17 million, or 16%.
The provision for credit losses was $126 million, an increase of $14 million, or 13%, compared with
the prior year. The current-quarter provision reflects a weakening credit environment and growth in
loan balances. The allowance for loan losses to average loans retained was 2.65% for the current
quarter, in line with the prior year. Nonperforming loans were $572 million, up $438 million from
the prior year, reflecting increases across all businesses and the effect of a weakening credit
environment. Net charge-offs were $40 million (0.22% net charge-off rate), compared with $20
million (0.13% net charge-off rate) in the prior year.
Noninterest expense was $486 million, an increase of $13 million, or 3%, from the prior year, due
to higher performance-based compensation expense.
Year-to-date results
Net income was $959 million, an increase of $113 million, or 13%, from the prior year driven by
growth in total net revenue partially offset by a higher provision for credit losses.
Total net revenue was $3.3 billion, an increase of $279 million, or 9%, from the prior year. Net
interest income was $2.2 billion, an increase of $111 million, or 5%, driven by double-digit growth
in liability balances and loans, largely offset by spread compression in the liability and loan
portfolios and a shift to narrower-spread liability products. Noninterest revenue was $1.1 billion,
up $168 million, or 18%, due to higher deposit-related fees as well as increases in other fee
income, partially offset by lower gains related to the sale of securities acquired in the
satisfaction of debt.
Middle Market Banking revenue was $2.1 billion, an increase of $149 million, or 7%. Mid-Corporate
Banking revenue was $678 million, an increase of $102 million, or 18%. Real Estate Banking revenue
was $282 million, a decline of $37 million, or 12%.
The provision for credit losses was $274 million, compared with $174 million in the prior year,
reflecting growth in loan balances and a weakening credit environment. The allowance for loan
losses to average loans retained was 2.72%, down from 2.75% in the prior year. Net charge-offs were
$170 million (0.32% net charge-off rate), compared with net charge-offs of $11 million (0.02% net
charge-off rate) in the prior year.
Noninterest expense was $1.4 billion, in line with the prior year.
38
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected metrics |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except ratio and headcount data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Selected balance sheet data
(period-end) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,700 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
$ |
8,000 |
|
|
$ |
6,700 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
Selected balance sheet data
(average) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
101,681 |
|
|
$ |
86,652 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
$ |
102,374 |
|
|
$ |
84,643 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans retained |
|
|
71,901 |
|
|
|
60,839 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
70,038 |
|
|
|
59,045 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at
fair value |
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
433 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
432 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
72,298 |
|
|
|
61,272 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
70,470 |
|
|
|
59,595 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Liability balances(a) |
|
|
99,410 |
|
|
|
88,081 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
99,430 |
|
|
|
84,697 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Equity |
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
6,700 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
7,000 |
|
|
|
6,435 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average loans by business: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Middle Market Banking |
|
$ |
43,155 |
|
|
$ |
37,617 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
$ |
42,052 |
|
|
$ |
37,016 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Mid-Corporate Banking |
|
|
16,491 |
|
|
|
12,076 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
15,669 |
|
|
|
11,484 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Real Estate Banking |
|
|
7,513 |
|
|
|
7,144 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
7,490 |
|
|
|
7,038 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Other |
|
|
5,139 |
|
|
|
4,435 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
5,259 |
|
|
|
4,057 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total Commercial Banking loans |
|
$ |
72,298 |
|
|
$ |
61,272 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
$ |
70,470 |
|
|
$ |
59,595 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headcount |
|
|
3,965 |
|
|
|
4,158 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
3,965 |
|
|
|
4,158 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit data and quality statistics: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans |
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
Allowance for credit losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
1,623 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
1,905 |
|
|
|
1,623 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Allowance for lending-related
commitments |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
236 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for credit losses |
|
|
2,096 |
|
|
|
1,859 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
2,096 |
|
|
|
1,859 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-off rate(b) |
|
|
0.22 |
% |
|
|
0.13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.32 |
% |
|
|
0.02 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to average
loans(b) |
|
|
2.65 |
|
|
|
2.67 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.72 |
|
|
|
2.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to
nonperforming loans |
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
1,211 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans to average loans |
|
|
0.79 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
|
0.22 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Liability balances include deposits and deposits swept to onbalance sheet liabilities
such as commercial paper, federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under
repurchase agreements. |
(b) |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans accounted for at fair value were excluded when calculating the
allowance coverage ratio and net charge-off rate. |
39
TREASURY & SECURITIES SERVICES
For a discussion of the business profile of TSS, see pages 5455 of JPMorgan Chases 2007
Annual Report and page 6 of this Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement data |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except headcount and ratio data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lending & deposit-related fees |
|
$ |
290 |
|
|
$ |
244 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
$ |
842 |
|
|
$ |
676 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
Asset management, administration and
commissions |
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
730 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
2,385 |
|
|
|
2,244 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
All other income |
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
649 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
1,230 |
|
|
|
1,145 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3,876 |
|
|
|
3,400 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
1,748 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
5,885 |
|
|
|
5,015 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
Credit reimbursement to IB(a) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
664 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
|
|
1,746 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Noncompensation expense |
|
|
661 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
1,864 |
|
|
|
1,563 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
3,884 |
|
|
|
3,358 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1,873 |
|
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
406 |
|
|
$ |
360 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
$ |
1,234 |
|
|
$ |
975 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue by business |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Services |
|
$ |
897 |
|
|
$ |
780 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
$ |
2,562 |
|
|
$ |
2,189 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Worldwide Securities Services |
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3,323 |
|
|
|
2,826 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
1,953 |
|
|
$ |
1,748 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
$ |
5,885 |
|
|
$ |
5,015 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Financial ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Overhead ratio |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax margin ratio(b) |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected balance sheet data
(period-end) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
$ |
4,500 |
|
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
$ |
4,500 |
|
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
Selected balance sheet data (average) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
49,386 |
|
|
$ |
55,688 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
54,243 |
|
|
$ |
50,829 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Loans(c) |
|
|
26,650 |
|
|
|
20,602 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
24,527 |
|
|
|
19,921 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Liability balances(d) |
|
|
259,992 |
|
|
|
236,381 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
260,882 |
|
|
|
221,606 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Equity |
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
3,500 |
|
|
|
3,000 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Headcount |
|
|
27,592 |
|
|
|
25,209 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
27,592 |
|
|
|
25,209 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
TSS is charged a credit reimbursement related to certain exposures managed within the IB
credit portfolio on behalf of clients shared with TSS. |
(b) |
|
Pretax margin represents income before income tax expense divided by total net revenue, which
is a measure of pretax performance and another basis by which management evaluates its
performance and that of its competitors. |
(c) |
|
Loan balances include wholesale overdrafts, commercial card and trade finance loans. |
(d) |
|
Liability balances include deposits and deposits swept to onbalance sheet liabilities such
as commercial paper, federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase
agreements. |
40
Quarterly results
Net income was $406 million, an increase of $46 million, or 13%, from the prior year, driven by
higher net revenue and the benefit of reduced deferred tax liabilities. This increase was
predominantly offset by higher noninterest expense.
Net revenue was $2.0 billion, an increase of $205 million, or 12%, from the prior year. Worldwide
Securities Services net revenue was $1.1 billion, an increase of $88 million, or 9%, from the prior
year. The growth was driven by wider spreads on liability products and in securities lending and
foreign exchange, combined with increased product usage by new and existing clients (largely in
custody, fund services and alternative investment services). These benefits were offset partially
by market depreciation. Treasury Services net revenue was a record $897 million, an increase of
$117 million, or 15%, reflecting higher liability balances as well as volume growth in electronic
funds transfer products and trade loans. TSS firmwide net revenue, which includes Treasury Services
net revenue recorded in other lines of business, grew to $2.7 billion, an increase of $260 million,
or 11%. Treasury Services firmwide net revenue grew to $1.6 billion, an increase of $172 million,
or 12%.
Noninterest expense was $1.3 billion, an increase of $205 million, or 18%, from the prior year,
reflecting higher expense related to business and volume growth as well as continued investment in
new product platforms.
Year-to-date results
Net income was $1.2 billion, an increase of $259 million, or 27%, from the prior year, driven by
higher net revenue. This increase was predominantly offset by higher noninterest expense.
Net revenue was $5.9 billion, an increase of $870 million, or 17%, from the prior year. Worldwide
Securities Services net revenue was $3.3 billion, an increase of $497 million, or 18%, from the
prior year. The growth was driven by wider spreads in securities lending, foreign exchange and
liability products, combined with increased product usage by new and existing clients (largely in
custody, fund services, alternative investment services and depositary receipts). These benefits
were offset partially by market depreciation. Treasury Services net revenue was $2.6 billion, an
increase of $373 million, or 17%, reflecting higher liability balances and volume growth in
electronic funds transfer products and trade loans as well as market-driven spreads. TSS firmwide
net revenue, which includes Treasury Services net revenue recorded in other lines of business, grew
to $8.0 billion, an increase of $1.1 billion, or 15%. Treasury Services firmwide net revenue grew
to $4.7 billion, an increase of $565 million, or 14%.
Noninterest expense was $3.9 billion, an increase of $526 million, or 16%, from the prior year,
reflecting higher expense related to business and volume growth as well as continued investment in
new product platforms.
41
TSS firmwide metrics
TSS firmwide metrics include revenue recorded in the CB, Regional Banking and AM lines of business
and excludes foreign exchange (FX) revenue recorded in the IB for TSS-related FX activity. In
order to capture the firmwide impact of TS and TSS products and revenue, management reviews
firmwide metrics such as liability balances, revenue and overhead ratios in assessing financial
performance for TSS. Firmwide metrics are necessary in order to understand the aggregate TSS
business.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except ratio data and |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
where otherwise noted) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
TSS firmwide disclosures |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Services revenue reported |
|
$ |
897 |
|
|
$ |
780 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
$ |
2,562 |
|
|
$ |
2,189 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
Treasury Services revenue reported in
Commercial Banking |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1,889 |
|
|
|
1,719 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Treasury Services revenue reported in
other lines of business |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Services firmwide
revenue(a) |
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
|
1,444 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
4,668 |
|
|
|
4,103 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Worldwide Securities Services revenue |
|
|
1,056 |
|
|
|
968 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3,323 |
|
|
|
2,826 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury & Securities Services
firmwide revenue(a) |
|
$ |
2,672 |
|
|
$ |
2,412 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
$ |
7,991 |
|
|
$ |
6,929 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Services firmwide liability
balances (average)(b) |
|
$ |
227,760 |
|
|
$ |
201,671 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
$ |
226,725 |
|
|
$ |
192,560 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Treasury & Securities Services firmwide
liability balances (average)(b) |
|
|
359,401 |
|
|
|
324,462 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
360,302 |
|
|
|
306,302 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
|
|
TSS firmwide financial ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury Services firmwide overhead
ratio(c) |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
54 |
% |
|
|
57 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Treasury & Securities Services overhead
ratio(c) |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Firmwide business metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under custody (in billions) |
|
$ |
14,417 |
|
|
$ |
15,614 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
14,417 |
|
|
$ |
15,614 |
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Number of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.$ ACH transactions originated
(in millions) |
|
|
997 |
|
|
|
943 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2,994 |
|
|
|
2,886 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Total U.S.$ clearing volume
(in thousands) |
|
|
29,277 |
|
|
|
28,031 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
86,396 |
|
|
|
82,650 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
International electronic funds transfer
volume (in thousands)(d) |
|
|
41,831 |
|
|
|
41,415 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
123,302 |
|
|
|
125,882 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Wholesale check volume (in millions) |
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
1,836 |
|
|
|
2,269 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
Wholesale cards issued
(in thousands)(e) |
|
|
21,858 |
|
|
|
18,108 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
21,858 |
|
|
|
18,108 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
TSS firmwide FX revenue, which includes FX revenue recorded in TSS and FX revenue
associated with TSS customers who are FX customers of the IB, was $196 million and $144
million for the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $609 million
and $395 million for year-to-date 2008 and 2007, respectively. This is not included in the
TS and TSS firmwide revenue. |
(b) |
|
Firmwide liability balances include TSs liability balances recorded in the CB line of
business. |
(c) |
|
Overhead ratios have been calculated based upon firmwide revenue and TSS and TS expense,
respectively, including those allocated to certain other lines of business. FX revenue and
expense recorded in the IB for TSS-related FX activity are not included in this ratio. |
(d) |
|
International electronic funds transfer includes non-U.S. dollar ACH and clearing volume. |
(e) |
|
Wholesale cards issued include domestic commercial card, stored value card, prepaid card and
government electronic benefit card products. |
42
ASSET MANAGEMENT
For a discussion of the business profile of AM, see pages 5658 of JPMorgan Chases 2007
Annual Report and on page 6 of this Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement data |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset management, administration
and commissions |
|
$ |
1,538 |
|
|
$ |
1,760 |
|
|
|
(13 |
)% |
|
$ |
4,642 |
|
|
$ |
4,920 |
|
|
|
(6 |
)% |
All other income |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
(72 |
) |
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
1,581 |
|
|
|
1,912 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
4,874 |
|
|
|
5,415 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Net interest income |
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
1,961 |
|
|
|
2,205 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
5,926 |
|
|
|
6,246 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
848 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
2,527 |
|
|
|
2,491 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Noncompensation expense |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,085 |
|
|
|
3,956 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Income
before income tax expense |
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
1,788 |
|
|
|
2,307 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
Income tax expense |
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
(28 |
) |
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
351 |
|
|
$ |
521 |
|
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
$ |
1,102 |
|
|
$ |
1,439 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue by client segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private Bank(a) |
|
$ |
631 |
|
|
$ |
624 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
$ |
1,935 |
|
|
$ |
1,712 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Institutional |
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
|
1,771 |
|
|
|
(18 |
) |
Retail |
|
|
399 |
|
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
1,355 |
|
|
|
1,768 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
Private Wealth Management(a) |
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,057 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Bear Stearns Brokerage |
|
|
93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
1,961 |
|
|
$ |
2,205 |
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
5,926 |
|
|
$ |
6,246 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Financial ratios |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROE |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Overhead ratio |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax margin ratio(b) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In the third quarter of 2008, certain clients were transferred from Private Bank to
Private Wealth Management. Prior periods have been revised to conform to this change. |
(b) |
|
Pretax margin represents income before income tax expense divided by total net revenue, which
is a measure of pretax performance and another basis by which management evaluates its
performance and that of its competitors. |
Quarterly results
Net income was $351 million, a decline of $170 million, or 33%, from the prior year, driven largely
by lower net revenue.
Net revenue was $2.0 billion, a decrease of $244 million, or 11%, from the prior year. Noninterest
revenue was $1.6 billion, a decline of $331 million, or 17%, due to lower performance fees and the
effect of lower markets, including the impact of lower market valuations of seed capital
investments; these effects were offset partially by the benefit of the Bear Stearns merger and
increased revenue from net asset inflows. Net interest income was $380 million, up $87 million, or
30%, from the prior year, predominantly due to higher loan and deposit balances and wider deposit
spreads.
Private Bank revenue was $631 million, relatively flat compared with the prior year, as increased
loan and deposit balances and higher assets under management largely offset the effect of lower
markets and lower performance fees. Institutional revenue declined 19% to $486 million due to lower
performance fees, partially offset by growth in assets under management. Retail revenue decreased
38% to $399 million due to the effect of lower markets, including the impact of lower market
valuations of seed capital investments and net equity outflows. Private Wealth Management revenue
grew 4% to $352 million due to higher loan and deposit balances and growth in assets under
management from net asset inflows. Bear Stearns Brokerage contributed $93 million to revenue.
The provision for credit losses was $20 million, compared with $3 million in the prior year,
reflecting an increase in loan balances and a lower level of recoveries.
43
Noninterest expense of $1.4 billion was flat compared with the prior year as the effect of the Bear
Stearns merger and increased headcount were offset by lower performance-based compensation.
Year-to-date results
Net income was $1.1 billion, a decline of $337 million, or 23%, from the prior year, driven by
lower net revenue and higher noninterest expense.
Net revenue was $5.9 billion, a decrease of $320 million, or 5%, from the prior year. Noninterest
revenue was $4.9 billion, a decline of $541 million, or 10%, from the prior year due to lower
performance fees and the effect of lower markets, including the impact of lower market valuations
of seed capital investments. The lower results were offset partially by the benefit of the Bear
Stearns merger and increased revenue from net asset inflows. Net interest income was $1.1 billion,
up $221 million, or 27%, from the prior year, predominantly due to higher deposit and loan balances
and wider deposit spreads.
Private Bank revenue grew 13% to $1.9 billion, due to higher assets under management and increased
loan and deposit balances, partially offset by the effect of lower markets and lower performance
fees. Institutional revenue declined 18% to $1.4 billion due to lower performance fees, partially
offset by growth in assets under management. Retail revenue declined 23% to $1.4 billion due to the
effect of lower markets, including the impact of lower market valuations of seed capital
investments and net equity outflows. Private Wealth Management revenue grew 6% to $1.1 billion due
to higher deposit and loan balances and growth in assets under management from net asset inflows.
Bear Stearns Brokerage contributed $131 million to revenue.
The provision for credit losses was $53 million, compared with a benefit of $17 million in the
prior year, reflecting an increase in loan balances and a lower level of recoveries.
Noninterest expense was $4.1 billion, up $129 million, or 3%, compared with the prior year as the
effect of the Bear Stearns merger and increased headcount were offset by lower performance-based
compensation.
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Business metrics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except headcount, ratios
and ranking data, |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
and where otherwise noted) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Number of: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client advisors |
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
|
1,680 |
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
1,684 |
|
|
|
1,680 |
|
|
|
|
% |
Retirement planning services participants |
|
|
1,492,000 |
|
|
|
1,495,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,492,000 |
|
|
|
1,495,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Bear Stearns brokers |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of customer assets in 4 & 5 Star Funds(a) |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of AUM in 1st and 2nd quartiles:(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 year |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
4 |
|
3 years |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
67 |
% |
|
|
73 |
% |
|
|
(8 |
) |
5 years |
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
76 |
% |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
77 |
% |
|
|
76 |
% |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected balance sheet data (period-end) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
$ |
7,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
$ |
7,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected balance sheet data (average) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
71,189 |
|
|
$ |
53,879 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
$ |
65,518 |
|
|
$ |
50,498 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Loans(c) |
|
|
39,750 |
|
|
|
30,928 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
38,552 |
|
|
|
28,440 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Deposits |
|
|
65,621 |
|
|
|
59,907 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
67,918 |
|
|
|
56,920 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
Equity |
|
|
5,500 |
|
|
|
4,000 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
5,190 |
|
|
|
3,834 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Headcount |
|
|
15,493 |
|
|
|
14,510 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
15,493 |
|
|
|
14,510 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit data and quality
statistics |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs (recoveries) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
|
80 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
|
90 |
|
Nonperforming loans |
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
|
|
121 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
332 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Allowance for lending-related commitments |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-off (recovery) rate |
|
|
(0.01 |
)% |
|
|
(0.06 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% |
|
|
(0.05 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses to average loans |
|
|
0.43 |
|
|
|
0.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.44 |
|
|
|
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses to nonperforming loans |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonperforming loans to average loans |
|
|
0.30 |
|
|
|
0.09 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.31 |
|
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Derived from following rating services: Morningstar for the United States; Micropal for
the United Kingdom, Luxembourg, Hong Kong and Taiwan; and Nomura for Japan. |
(b) |
|
Derived from following rating services: Lipper for the United States and Taiwan; Micropal
for the United Kingdom, Luxembourg and Hong Kong; and Nomura for Japan. |
(c) |
|
Reflects the transfer in 2007 of held-for-investment prime mortgage loans transferred from
AM to Corporate within the Corporate/Private Equity segment. |
Assets under supervision
Assets under supervision were $1.6 trillion, an increase of $23 billion, or 1%, from the prior
year. Assets under management were $1.2 trillion, down $10 billion, or 1%, from the prior year. The
decrease in assets under management was predominantly due to lower equity markets and equity
product outflows, partially offset by liquidity product inflows across all segments and the
addition of Bear Stearns assets under management. Custody, brokerage, administration and deposit
balances were $409 billion, up $33 billion, driven by the addition of Bear Stearns Brokerage.
45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS UNDER SUPERVISION(a) (in billions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of September 30, |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets by asset class |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity |
|
$ |
524 |
|
|
$ |
368 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
195 |
|
Equities & balanced |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
Alternatives |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under management |
|
|
1,153 |
|
|
|
1,163 |
|
Custody/brokerage/administration/deposits |
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under supervision |
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
|
$ |
1,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets by client segment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional |
|
$ |
653 |
|
|
$ |
603 |
|
Private Bank(b) |
|
|
194 |
|
|
|
179 |
|
Retail |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
304 |
|
Private Wealth Management(b) |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
Bear Stearns Brokerage |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under management |
|
$ |
1,153 |
|
|
$ |
1,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Institutional |
|
$ |
653 |
|
|
$ |
604 |
|
Private Bank(b) |
|
|
417 |
|
|
|
395 |
|
Retail |
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
399 |
|
Private Wealth Management(b) |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Bear Stearns Brokerage |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under supervision |
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
|
$ |
1,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets by geographic region |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S./Canada |
|
$ |
785 |
|
|
$ |
745 |
|
International |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under management |
|
$ |
1,153 |
|
|
$ |
1,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S./Canada |
|
$ |
1,100 |
|
|
$ |
1,022 |
|
International |
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under supervision |
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
|
$ |
1,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual fund assets by asset class |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity |
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
$ |
308 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Equity |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mutual fund assets |
|
$ |
648 |
|
|
$ |
589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes assets under management of American Century Companies, Inc., in which the Firm
has 43% ownership. |
(b) |
|
In the third quarter of 2008, certain clients were transferred from Private Bank to Private
Wealth Management. Prior periods have been revised to conform to this change. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
Assets under management rollforward |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
1,185 |
|
|
$ |
1,109 |
|
|
$ |
1,193 |
|
|
$ |
1,013 |
|
Net asset flows: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
Fixed income |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
6 |
|
Equities, balanced and alternative |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
Market/performance/other impacts(a) |
|
|
(78 |
) |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(130 |
) |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under management |
|
$ |
1,153 |
|
|
$ |
1,163 |
|
|
$ |
1,153 |
|
|
$ |
1,163 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets under supervision rollforward |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
1,611 |
|
|
$ |
1,472 |
|
|
$ |
1,572 |
|
|
$ |
1,347 |
|
Net asset flows |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
Market/performance/other impacts(a) |
|
|
(110 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets under supervision |
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
|
$ |
1,539 |
|
|
$ |
1,562 |
|
|
$ |
1,539 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes $15 billion for assets under management and $68 billion for assets under
supervision from the Bear Stearns merger in the second quarter of 2008. |
46
CORPORATE / PRIVATE EQUITY
For a discussion of the business profile of Corporate/Private Equity, see pages 5960 of
JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement data |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except headcount) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal transactions(a) |
|
$ |
(1,876 |
) |
|
$ |
1,082 |
|
|
NM% |
|
$ |
(1,968 |
) |
|
$ |
3,779 |
|
|
NM% |
Securities gains (losses)(b) |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
244 |
|
|
|
1,138 |
|
|
|
(107 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
All other income(c) |
|
|
(274 |
) |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
987 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
333 |
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
(1,710 |
) |
|
|
1,280 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
3,900 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
Net interest income (expense) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(279 |
) |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
(569 |
) |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
(1,748 |
) |
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
3,331 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses(d) |
|
|
2,355 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
2,841 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
652 |
|
|
|
569 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
1,902 |
|
|
|
2,040 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
Noncompensation expense(e) |
|
|
570 |
|
|
|
674 |
|
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
1,187 |
|
|
|
2,048 |
|
|
|
(42 |
) |
Merger costs |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
1,318 |
|
|
|
1,304 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
3,340 |
|
|
|
4,275 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
Net expense allocated to other
businesses |
|
|
(1,150 |
) |
|
|
(1,059 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(3,277 |
) |
|
|
(3,174 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax
expense and extraordinary gain |
|
|
(4,271 |
) |
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(3,023 |
) |
|
|
2,255 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(1,727 |
) |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(1,084 |
) |
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary
gain |
|
|
(2,544 |
) |
|
|
513 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(1,939 |
) |
|
|
1,526 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
Extraordinary gain(f) |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,963 |
) |
|
$ |
513 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
$ |
(1,358 |
) |
|
$ |
1,526 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity |
|
$ |
(216 |
) |
|
$ |
733 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
3,279 |
|
|
|
(96 |
) |
Corporate |
|
|
(1,532 |
) |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(263 |
) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
(1,748 |
) |
|
$ |
1,001 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
$ |
(119 |
) |
|
$ |
3,331 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity |
|
$ |
(164 |
) |
|
$ |
409 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
1,809 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(1,064 |
) |
|
|
142 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(75 |
) |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
55 |
|
Merger-related items(g) |
|
|
(735 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(1,275 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net income (loss) |
|
$ |
(1,963 |
) |
|
$ |
513 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
$ |
(1,358 |
) |
|
$ |
1,526 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Headcount |
|
|
21,641 |
|
|
|
22,864 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
21,641 |
|
|
|
22,864 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included losses on preferred equity interest in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in the third
quarter of 2008. |
(b) |
|
Included gains on the sale of MasterCard shares in the second quarter of 2008. |
(c) |
|
Included proceeds from the sale of Visa shares in its initial public offering in the first
quarter of 2008. |
(d) |
|
Included a $2.0 billion charge to conform Washington Mutuals loan loss reserves to JPMorgan
Chases accounting policy in the third quarter of 2008. |
(e) |
|
Included a release of credit card litigation reserves in the first quarter of 2008. |
(f) |
|
Effective September 25, 2008, JPMorgan Chase acquired Washington Mutuals banking operations
from the FDIC for $1.9 billion. The fair value of the Washington Mutual net assets acquired
exceeded the purchase price, which resulted in negative goodwill. In accordance with SFAS 141,
nonfinancial assets that are not held-for-sale were written down against that negative
goodwill. The negative goodwill that remained after writing down nonfinancial assets was
recognized as an extraordinary gain. |
(g) |
|
Included an accounting conformity loan loss reserve provision and an extraordinary gain
related to the Washington Mutual transaction in the third quarter of 2008. The three and nine
month periods of 2008 reflect items related to the Bear Stearns merger, which included Bear
Stearns equity earnings, merger costs, Bear Stearns asset management liquidation costs and
Bear Stearns private client services broker retention expense. Prior periods represent costs
related to the 2004 Bank One and 2006 Bank of New York transactions. |
47
Quarterly results
Net loss for Corporate/Private Equity was $2.0 billion, compared with net income of $513 million in
the prior year.
Net loss included a charge of $1.2 billion (after-tax) to conform loan loss reserves and an
extraordinary gain of $581 million related to the acquisition of Washington Mutuals
banking operations, which closed on September 25, 2008. Net loss also included $95 million
(after-tax) of continuing Bear Stearns merger-related items.
Net loss for Private Equity was $164 million, compared with net income of $409 million in the prior
year. Net revenue was negative $216 million, a decrease of $949 million, reflecting Private Equity
losses of $206 million, compared with gains of $766 million in the prior year. Noninterest expense
was $41 million, a decline of $54 million from the prior year, reflecting lower compensation
expense.
Excluding the above merger-related items, the net loss for Corporate was $1.1 billion, compared
with net income of $142 million in the prior year. Net revenue was negative $1.5 billion, compared
with revenue of $268 million in the prior year. This decrease reflects a higher level of trading
losses, including losses of $1.0 billion on preferred securities of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, a
$375 million charge related to the offer to repurchase the Firm and its affiliates auction-rate
securities at par for certain customers, and the absence of a $115 million gain from the sale of MasterCard shares in the
prior year. These losses were offset partially by securities gains of $440 million. Excluding the
provision related to Washington Mutual, the current-quarter provision for credit losses of $378
million includes an increase in the allowance for loan losses of $250 million for prime mortgage
(see Retail Financial Services discussion of the provision for loan losses for further detail).
Noninterest expense was $127 million, a decrease of $23 million from the prior year, driven by
lower litigation expense.
Year-to-date results
Net loss for Corporate/Private Equity was $1.4 billion, compared with net income of $1.5 billion in
the prior year.
Results included a $1.2 billion (after-tax) conforming loan loss reserve provision and an
extraordinary gain of $581 million related to the acquisition of Washington Mutuals
banking operations, the after-tax effect from the sale of Visa shares in its initial public
offering ($1.5 billion pretax and $955 million after-tax) and the impact of Bear Stearns
merger-related items, netting to a loss of $635 million.
Net loss for Private Equity was $8 million, compared with net income of $1.8 billion in the prior
year. Net revenue was $144 million, a decrease of $3.1 billion, reflecting Private Equity gains of
$203 million, compared with gains of $3.4 billion in the prior year. Noninterest expense was $161
million, a decline of $296 million from the prior year, reflecting lower compensation expense.
Excluding the above merger-related items and the impact of the Visa initial public offering, the net loss for Corporate
was $1.0 billion, compared with a net loss of $167 million in the prior year. Net revenue was
negative $1.4 billion, compared with revenue of $52 million in the prior year. This decrease was
due to a higher level of trading losses, including losses of $1.0 billion on preferred securities
of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, a $375 million charge related to the offer to repurchase
auction-rate securities at par, and the absence of a $115 million gain from the sale of MasterCard
shares in the prior year. Trading losses were offset partially by securities gains of $1.1 billion,
which included a pretax gain of $668 million from the sale of MasterCard shares. Excluding the
provision related to the Washington Mutual transaction, there were credit losses of $865 million
compared with a benefit of $25 million in the prior year, predominantly reflecting an increase in
the allowance for loan losses and higher net charge-offs for prime mortgages. Excluding the above
merger-related items, noninterest expense was negative $435 million compared with $645 million in
the prior year, reflecting a reduction of credit card-related litigation expense and the absence of
prior-year Bank One merger expense.
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected income statement and balance
sheet data |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
Treasury |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities gains (losses)(a) |
|
$ |
442 |
|
|
$ |
126 |
|
|
|
251 |
% |
|
$ |
1,140 |
|
|
$ |
(109 |
) |
|
|
NM |
% |
Investment securities portfolio (average) |
|
|
105,984 |
|
|
|
85,470 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
94,592 |
|
|
|
86,552 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Investment securities portfolio (ending) |
|
|
115,703 |
|
|
|
86,495 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
115,703 |
|
|
|
86,495 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Mortgage loans (average)(b) |
|
|
42,432 |
|
|
|
29,854 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
41,228 |
|
|
|
27,326 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
Mortgage loans (ending)(b) |
|
|
41,976 |
|
|
|
32,804 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
41,976 |
|
|
|
32,804 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains |
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
$ |
504 |
|
|
|
(92 |
) |
|
$ |
1,693 |
|
|
$ |
2,212 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
Unrealized gains (losses)(c) |
|
|
(273 |
) |
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(1,480 |
) |
|
|
1,038 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Total direct investments |
|
|
(233 |
) |
|
|
731 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
3,250 |
|
|
|
(93 |
) |
Third-party fund investments |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
|
|
Total private equity gains (losses)(d) |
|
$ |
(206 |
) |
|
$ |
766 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
$ |
3,372 |
|
|
|
(94 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity portfolio information(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct investments |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Publicly held securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value |
|
$ |
600 |
|
|
$ |
390 |
|
|
|
54 |
% |
Cost |
|
|
705 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
145 |
|
Quoted public value |
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
536 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Privately held direct securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value |
|
|
6,038 |
|
|
|
5,914 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Cost |
|
|
6,058 |
|
|
|
4,867 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third-party fund investments(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Carrying value |
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Cost |
|
|
1,121 |
|
|
|
1,076 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total private equity portfolio Carrying value |
|
$ |
7,527 |
|
|
$ |
7,153 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Total private equity portfolio Cost |
|
$ |
7,884 |
|
|
$ |
6,231 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Year-to-date 2008 included a gain on the sale of MasterCard shares. All periods reflect
repositioning of the Corporate investment securities portfolio and exclude gains/losses on
securities used to manage risk associated with MSRs. |
(b) |
|
Held-for-investment prime mortgage loans were transferred from RFS and AM to the
Corporate/Private Equity segment for risk management and reporting purposes. The initial
transfers had no material impact on the financial results of Corporate/Private Equity. |
(c) |
|
Unrealized gains (losses) contain reversals of unrealized gains and losses that were
recognized in prior periods and have now been realized. |
(d) |
|
Included in principal transactions revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income. |
(e) |
|
For more information on the Firms policies regarding the valuation of the private equity
portfolio, see Note 5 on pages 98102 of this Form 10-Q. |
(f) |
|
Unfunded commitments to third-party private equity funds were $931 million and $881 million
at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
The carrying value of the private equity portfolio at September 30, 2008, was $7.5 billion, up
from $7.2 billion at December 31, 2007. The portfolio represented 7.5% of the Firms stockholders
equity less goodwill at September 30, 2008, down from 9.2% at December 31, 2007.
WASHINGTON MUTUAL
The effects of the acquisition of Washington Mutuals banking operations on September 25,
2008, were not included in the preceding business segment results as such operations did not have a
material effect on the results of the quarter ended September 30, 2008, except the charge to
conform Washington Mutuals loan loss reserves and the extraordinary gain related to the
transaction which are reflected for JPMorgan Chase in the Corporate/Private Equity segment. The
following table presents the September 30, 2008 allocated value of assets and liabilities, and
other selected metrics related to the Washington Mutual transaction.
49
|
|
|
|
|
Selected balance sheet data (in millions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
3,680 |
|
Deposits with banks |
|
|
3,517 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
|
1,700 |
|
Trading assets |
|
|
5,691 |
|
Securities |
|
|
17,240 |
|
Loans (net of allowance for loan losses) (a) |
|
|
204,213 |
|
Accrued interest and accounts receivable |
|
|
3,332 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
5,845 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
15,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
260,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
159,824 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
4,549 |
|
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
81,759 |
|
Trading liabilities derivative payables |
|
|
585 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expense and other liabilities |
|
|
6,092 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
6,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
$ |
259,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan balances |
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans excluding purchased credit impaired: |
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
$ |
22,217 |
|
Prime mortgage |
|
|
23,442 |
|
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
4,725 |
|
Option ARMs |
|
|
18,989 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
15,158 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
1,858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans excluding purchased credit impaired |
|
|
86,389 |
|
Consumer loans purchased credit impaired |
|
|
77,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
164,242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale loans(b) |
|
|
44,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
|
208,724 |
|
Allowance for loan losses(a) (c) |
|
|
(4,511 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
Total net loans |
|
$ |
204,213 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total managed loans |
|
$ |
220,643 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit data and credit quality statistics |
|
|
|
|
30+ day delinquency rate |
|
|
8.18 |
% |
Allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
4,511 |
|
Allowance for loan losses to ending loans(c) |
|
|
3.45 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
|
|
Checking |
|
$ |
45,494 |
|
Savings |
|
|
19,580 |
|
Time and other |
|
|
94,750 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deposits |
|
$ |
159,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage banking metrics (in billions) |
|
|
|
|
Third-party mortgage loans serviced (ending) |
|
$ |
433.0 |
|
MSR net carrying value (ending) |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other metrics |
|
|
|
|
Branches |
|
|
2,244 |
|
ATMs |
|
|
5,081 |
|
Headcount |
|
|
41,798 |
|
Checking accounts (in thousands) |
|
|
12,818 |
|
Net accounts
opened (in millions)(d) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes an adjustment of $2.0 billion to conform Washington Mutuals loan loss allowance to
JPMorgan Chases policy. |
(b) |
|
Included $272 million of purchased credit impaired loans. |
(c) |
|
Purchased credit impaired
loans of $78.1 billion were excluded when calculating the ratio
of the allowance for loan losses to ending loans. These loans were recorded at fair value on
the transaction date, including an adjustment for credit impairment. Accordingly, no allowance
for loan losses has been recorded for these assets as of September 30, 2008. |
(d) |
|
Represents credit card
accounts acquired by JPMorgan Chase in the Washington Mutual
transaction. |
50
BALANCE SHEET ANALYSIS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selected balance sheet data (in millions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
54,350 |
|
|
$ |
40,144 |
|
Deposits with banks |
|
|
34,372 |
|
|
|
11,466 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
|
233,668 |
|
|
|
170,897 |
|
Securities borrowed |
|
|
152,050 |
|
|
|
84,184 |
|
Trading assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments |
|
|
401,609 |
|
|
|
414,273 |
|
Derivative receivables |
|
|
118,648 |
|
|
|
77,136 |
|
Securities |
|
|
150,779 |
|
|
|
85,450 |
|
Loans |
|
|
761,381 |
|
|
|
519,374 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(19,052 |
) |
|
|
(9,234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses |
|
|
742,329 |
|
|
|
510,140 |
|
Accrued interest and accounts receivable |
|
|
104,232 |
|
|
|
24,823 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
46,121 |
|
|
|
45,270 |
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
22,528 |
|
|
|
14,731 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
190,783 |
|
|
|
83,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,251,469 |
|
|
$ |
1,562,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
969,783 |
|
|
$ |
740,728 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
224,075 |
|
|
|
154,398 |
|
Commercial paper and other borrowed funds |
|
|
222,307 |
|
|
|
78,431 |
|
Trading liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments |
|
|
76,213 |
|
|
|
89,162 |
|
Derivative payables |
|
|
85,816 |
|
|
|
68,705 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expense and other liabilities |
|
|
260,563 |
|
|
|
94,476 |
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs |
|
|
11,437 |
|
|
|
14,016 |
|
Long-term debt and trust preferred capital debt securities |
|
|
255,432 |
|
|
|
199,010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,105,626 |
|
|
|
1,438,926 |
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
145,843 |
|
|
|
123,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,251,469 |
|
|
$ |
1,562,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets overview
The following is a discussion of the significant changes in the
Consolidated Balance Sheets from
December 31, 2007.
Deposits with banks; federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements;
securities borrowed; federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase
agreements
The Firm utilizes deposits with banks, federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale
agreements, securities borrowed, and federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under
repurchase agreements as part of its liquidity management activities to manage the Firms cash
positions and risk-based capital requirements and to support the Firms trading and risk management
activities. In particular, the Firm uses securities purchased under resale agreements and
securities borrowed to provide funding or liquidity to clients by purchasing and borrowing clients
securities for the short-term. Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under
repurchase agreements are used as short-term funding sources for the Firm and to make securities
available to clients for their short-term purposes. The increases from December 31, 2007, in
securities borrowed, securities purchased under resale agreements and deposits with banks was
related to the assets acquired as a result of the Bear Stearns merger, growth in demand from
clients for liquidity, and a higher level of funds available for short-term investment
opportunities. The increase in securities sold under repurchase agreements reflected higher
short-term funding requirements to fulfill clients demand for liquidity and to finance the Firms
AFS securities inventory, and the effect of the liabilities assumed in connection with the Bear
Stearns merger. For additional information on the Firms Liquidity Risk Management, see pages
6164 of this Form 10-Q.
Trading assets and liabilities debt and equity instruments
The Firm uses debt and equity trading instruments for both market-making and proprietary
risk-taking activities. These instruments consist predominantly of fixed income securities,
including government and corporate debt; equity, including convertible securities; loans, including
certain prime mortgage and other loans warehoused by RFS and IB for sale or securitization purposes
and accounted for at fair value under SFAS 159; and physical commodities inventories. The decreases
in trading assets and liabilities debt and equity from December 31, 2007, reflected the effect
of the
51
challenging capital markets environment, particularly for debt securities, partially offset by
positions acquired as a result of the Bear Stearns merger. For additional information, refer to
Note 3 and Note 5 on pages 98 109 and 111 113 respectively, of this Form 10-Q.
Trading assets and liabilities derivative receivables and payables
The Firm utilizes various interest rate, foreign exchange, equity, credit and commodity derivatives
for market-making, proprietary risk-taking and risk-management purposes. The increase in derivative
receivables and payables from December 31, 2007, was largely the result of positions acquired in
the Bear Stearns merger as well as the effect of currency and equity market volatility on foreign
exchange and equity derivative receivables, respectively. For additional information, refer to
derivative contracts, Note 3, Note 5 and Note 28 on
pages 69 71, 98 109, 111 113 and 145 146 respectively, of this Form 10-Q.
Securities
Almost all of the Firms securities portfolio is classified as AFS and is used predominantly to
manage the Firms exposure to interest rate movements. The AFS portfolio increased from December
31, 2007, predominantly as a result of purchases and securities acquired in the Washington
Mutual transaction, partially offset by sales and maturities. For additional information related to
securities, refer to the Corporate/Private Equity segment discussion,
Note 3 and Note 11 on pages 47 49, 98 109
and 117 119, respectively, of this Form 10-Q.
Loans and allowance for loan losses
The Firm provides loans to a variety of customers, from large corporate and institutional clients
to individual consumers. Loans increased from December 31, 2007, largely due to loans acquired
in the acquisition of Washington Mutuals banking operations, organic growth in lending across all
wholesale businesses, and growth in the consumer prime mortgage portfolio driven by the
decision to retain, rather than sell, new originations of nonconforming mortgage loans. These
increases were partially offset by a decline in heritage JPMorgan Chases credit card receivables
as a result of a higher level of securitizations. Both the consumer and wholesale components of the
allowance for loan losses increased from December 31, 2007. The increase in the allowance for loan
losses includes the addition from noncredit impaired loans acquired in the Washington Mutual
transaction. The consumer allowance also rose due to an increase in estimated losses for home
equity, subprime mortgage, prime mortgage and credit card loans due to the effects of continued
housing price declines and slowing economic growth. Excluding the transaction with Washington
Mutual, the increase in the wholesale allowance was due to the effect of a weakening credit
environment and the impact of the transfer of leveraged lending loans in the IB to retained loans
from held-for-sale loans and, to a lesser extent, loan growth. For a more detailed discussion of
the loan portfolio and the allowance for loan losses, refer to Credit Risk Management on pages
64 80, and Notes 3, 4, 13 and 14 on pages 98 109,
109 111, 120 122 and 123, respectively, of this Form 10-Q.
Accrued interest and accounts receivable; accounts payable, accrued expense and other liabilities
The Firms accrued interest and accounts receivable consist of accrued interest receivable from
interest-earning assets; receivables from customers (primarily from
activities related to IBs prime services business); receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing
organizations; and receivables from failed
securities sales. The Firms accounts payable, accrued expense, and other liabilities consist of
accounts payable to customers (primarily from activities related to
IBs prime services business), payables to brokers, dealers and
clearing organizations; payables from failed securities purchases; accrued expense, including
for interest-bearing liabilities; and all other liabilities, including obligations to return
securities received as collateral. The increase in accrued interest and accounts receivable from
December 31, 2007, was due largely to the merger with Bear Stearns, reflecting higher customer
receivables in IBs prime services business and higher levels of fails as a result of the tight
market for U.S. Treasury securities. The increase in accounts payable, accrued expense and other
liabilities was predominantly due to the Bear Stearns merger, reflecting higher customer payables,
primarily related to IBs prime services business; as well as higher obligations to return securities
received as collateral. For additional information, see Note 15 on page 124 of this Form 10-Q.
Goodwill
Goodwill arises from business combinations and represents the excess of the cost of an acquired
entity over the net fair value amounts assigned to assets acquired and liabilities assumed. The
increase in goodwill was due to the purchase of an additional equity interest in Highbridge,
tax-related purchase accounting adjustments associated with the 2004 Bank One merger and the merger with
Bear Stearns. For additional information, see Note 18 on pages 135 137 of this Form 10-Q.
Other intangible assets
The Firms other intangible assets consist of MSRs, purchased credit card relationships, other
credit card-related intangibles, core deposit intangibles, and all other intangibles. MSRs
increased due to the Washington Mutual transaction, sales and securitizations in RFS of originated
loans and purchases of MSRs, partially offset by servicing
52
portfolio runoff. The decrease in other intangible assets reflects amortization expense associated
with credit card-related and core deposit intangibles, partially offset by an increase resulting
from the purchase of an additional equity interest in Highbridge, as well as the acquisition of an
institutional global custody portfolio. For additional information on MSRs and other intangible
assets, see Note 18 on pages 135137 of this Form 10-Q.
Other assets
The Firms other assets consist of private equity and other investments, collateral received,
corporate and bank-owned life insurance policies, premises and equipment, and all other assets. The
increase in other assets from December 31, 2007, was due largely to the purchase of asset-backed commercial
paper from money market mutual funds in connection with the AML Facility, which was established by
the Federal Reserve on September 19, 2008, as a special lending facility to provide liquidity
to eligible MMMFs. Also contributing to the increase was the merger
with Bear Stearns, which resulted in a
higher volume of collateral received. For additional information regarding the AML Facility, see
the Recent Market Developments AML Facility and Note 15
on pages 78 and 124, respectively, of this Form 10-Q.
Deposits
The Firms deposits represent a liability to customers, both
retail and wholesale, related to non-brokerage funds
held on their behalf. Deposits are generally classified by location (U.S. and non-U.S.), whether
they are interest or noninterest-bearing, and by type (i.e., demand, money market deposit accounts,
savings, time or negotiable order of withdrawal accounts). Deposits help provide a stable and
consistent source of funding for the Firm. Deposits were at a higher level compared with the level
at December 31, 2007, predominantly from the deposits assumed in the acquisition of Washington
Mutuals banking operations, and net increases in wholesale interest- and noninterest-bearing
deposits in TSS. The increase in TSS was driven by both new and
existing clients, and due to
the heightened volatility and credit concerns in the global markets. For more information on
deposits, refer to the TSS and RFS segment discussions on pages 4042 and 2632, respectively,
and the Liquidity Risk Management discussion on pages 6164 of this Form 10-Q. For more
information on wholesale liability balances, including deposits, refer to the CB and TSS segment
discussions on pages 3739 and 4042 of this Form 10-Q.
Commercial paper and other borrowed funds
The Firm utilizes commercial paper and other borrowed funds as part of its liquidity management
activities to meet short-term funding needs, and in connection with a TSS liquidity management
product whereby excess client funds, predominantly in TSS, CB and RFS, are transferred into
commercial paper overnight sweep accounts. The increases in commercial paper and other borrowed
funds was predominantly due to advances from Federal Home Loan Banks of $80.6 billion that were
assumed in the Washington Mutual transaction and nonrecourse advances
from the FRBB to fund purchases of asset-backed commercial paper from money market mutual funds, and
growth in the volume of liability balances in sweep accounts. For additional information on the
Firms Liquidity Risk Management and other borrowed funds, see pages 6164 and
Note 20 on page 138 of this Form 10-Q.
Long-term debt and trust preferred capital debt securities
The Firm utilizes long-term debt and trust preferred capital debt securities to provide
cost-effective and diversified sources of funds and as critical components of the Firms liquidity
and capital management. Long-term debt and trust preferred capital debt securities increased from
December 31, 2007, predominantly due to the debt assumed in both the merger with Bear Stearns and
the Washington Mutual transaction, partially offset by net maturities and redemptions including IB
structured notes, the issuances of which are generally client-driven. For additional information on
the Firms long-term debt activities, see the Liquidity Risk Management discussion on pages 6164
and Note 21 on pages 139140 of this Form 10-Q.
Stockholders equity
The increase in total stockholders equity from December 31, 2007, was due to the issuance of
common stock, the merger with Bear Stearns and issuances under the Firms employee stock-based
compensation plans; the issuance of preferred stock in the second and third quarters of 2008; and
net income for the first nine months of 2008. These additions were partially offset by the
declaration of cash dividends and net losses recorded within accumulated other comprehensive
income. For a further discussion, see the Capital Management section that follows, and Note 22 and
Note 25 on pages 141142 and 143144, respectively, of this Form 10-Q.
53
CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
The following discussion of JPMorgan Chases capital management highlights developments since
December 31, 2007, and should be read in conjunction with Capital Management on pages 6365 of
JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
The Firms capital management framework is intended to ensure that there is capital sufficient to
support the underlying risks of the Firms business activities and to maintain well-capitalized
status under regulatory requirements. In addition, the Firm holds capital above these requirements
in amounts deemed appropriate to achieve managements regulatory and debt rating objectives. The
process of assigning equity to the lines of business is integrated into the Firms capital
framework and is overseen by the Asset-Liability Committee (ALCO).
Line of business equity
Equity for a line of business represents the amount the Firm believes the business would require if
it were operating independently, incorporating sufficient capital to address economic risk
measures, regulatory capital requirements and capital levels for similarly rated peers. Return on
equity is measured and internal targets for expected returns are established as a key measure of a
business segments performance.
Relative to the third quarter of 2007, line of business equity
increased during the second quarter of 2008 in IB and AM due to the Bear Stearns merger, business growth across the businesses and, for AM, the
purchase of the additional equity interest in Highbridge. At the end of the third quarter of 2008, equity was increased for each line of business with a view
toward the future implementation of the new Basel II capital rules.
For further details on these rules, see Basel II on page 57 of this Form 10-Q. In addition, capital allocated to RFS, CS, and CB was increased as
a result of the acquisition of Washington Mutuals banking operations. The Firm may revise its
equity capital-allocation methodology in the future.
In accordance with SFAS 142, the lines of business perform the required goodwill impairment
testing. For a further discussion of goodwill and impairment testing, see Critical Accounting
Estimates Used by the Firm and Note 18 on pages 98 and 154, respectively, of JPMorgan Chases 2007
Annual Report, and Note 18 on pages 135136 of this Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of business equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in billions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Bank |
|
$ |
33.0 |
|
|
$ |
21.0 |
|
Retail Financial Services |
|
|
25.0 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
Card Services |
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
Commercial Banking |
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Treasury & Securities Services |
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Asset Management |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Corporate/Private Equity |
|
|
45.2 |
|
|
|
58.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stockholders equity |
|
$ |
137.7 |
|
|
$ |
123.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of business equity |
|
Average for the period |
(in billions) |
|
3Q08 |
|
|
2Q08 |
|
|
3Q07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Bank |
|
$ |
26.0 |
|
|
$ |
23.3 |
|
|
$ |
21.0 |
|
Retail Financial Services |
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
Card Services |
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
Commercial Banking |
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Treasury & Securities Services |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
Asset Management |
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Corporate/Private Equity |
|
|
53.5 |
|
|
|
56.4 |
|
|
|
54.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stockholders equity |
|
$ |
126.6 |
|
|
$ |
126.4 |
|
|
$ |
119.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic risk capital
JPMorgan Chase assesses its capital adequacy relative to the risks underlying the Firms business
activities, utilizing internal risk-assessment methodologies. The Firm assigns economic capital
primarily based upon four risk factors: credit risk, market risk, operational risk and private
equity risk, principally for the Firms private equity business.
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic risk capital |
|
Quarterly Averages |
(in billions) |
|
3Q08 |
|
|
2Q08 |
|
|
3Q07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit risk |
|
$ |
37.1 |
|
|
$ |
34.8 |
|
|
$ |
30.5 |
|
Market risk |
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
8.5 |
|
|
|
9.7 |
|
Operational risk |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
Private equity risk |
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic risk capital |
|
|
60.6 |
|
|
|
54.1 |
|
|
|
49.5 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
45.9 |
|
|
|
45.8 |
|
|
|
45.3 |
|
Other |
|
|
20.1 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stockholders equity |
|
$ |
126.6 |
|
|
$ |
126.4 |
|
|
$ |
119.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Regulatory capital
The Federal Reserve establishes
capital requirements, including well-capitalized standards for the bank holding company. The
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) establishes similar capital requirements and
standards for the Firms national banks, including JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., and Chase Bank USA,
N.A.
The Federal Reserve granted the Firm, for a period of 18 months following the merger with
Bear Stearns, relief up to a certain specified amount and subject to certain conditions from the
Federal Reserves risk-based capital and leverage requirements with respect to Bear Stearns
risk-weighted assets and other exposures acquired. The amount of such relief is subject to
reduction by one-sixth each quarter subsequent to the Merger and expires on October 1, 2009. The
OCC granted JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. similar relief from its risk-based capital and leverage
requirements.
At September 30,
2008, the Firm has purchased and pledged $61.3 billion of ABCP under the AML Facility and recorded
a nonrecourse liability to the FRBB for the same amount. For additional information regarding this
facility, see Recent Market Developments AML Facility discussion on page 8 of this Form
10-Q and Note 15 on page 124 of this Form 10-Q.
The following table presents the risk-based capital ratios for JPMorgan Chase and its significant
banking subsidiaries at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007. The table indicates that the
Firm and its significant banking subsidiaries were well-capitalized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted |
|
|
Tier 1 |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Tier 1 |
|
|
|
Tier 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-weighted |
|
|
average |
|
|
capital |
|
|
capital |
|
|
leverage |
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
capital |
|
|
Total capital |
|
|
assets(c) |
|
|
assets(d) |
|
|
ratio |
|
|
ratio |
|
|
ratio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
|
$ |
111,630 |
|
|
$ |
159,175 |
|
|
$ |
1,261,034 |
|
|
$ |
1,555,297 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
7.2 |
% |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
|
|
97,103 |
|
|
|
140,509 |
|
|
|
1,227,798 |
|
|
|
1,335,007 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
Chase Bank USA, N.A. |
|
|
9,912 |
|
|
|
11,299 |
|
|
|
78,853 |
|
|
|
64,312 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
|
|
15.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
|
$ |
88,746 |
|
|
$ |
132,242 |
|
|
$ |
1,051,879 |
|
|
$ |
1,473,541 |
|
|
|
8.4 |
% |
|
|
12.6 |
% |
|
|
6.0 |
% |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
|
|
78,453 |
|
|
|
112,253 |
|
|
|
950,001 |
|
|
|
1,268,304 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
Chase Bank USA, N.A. |
|
|
9,407 |
|
|
|
10,720 |
|
|
|
73,169 |
|
|
|
60,905 |
|
|
|
12.9 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well-capitalized ratios(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.0 |
% |
|
|
10.0 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
%(e) |
Minimum capital ratios(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Asset and capital amounts for JPMorgan Chases banking subsidiaries reflect intercompany
transactions, whereas the respective amounts for JPMorgan Chase reflect the elimination of
intercompany transactions. |
(b) |
|
As defined by the
regulations issued by the Federal Reserve, OCC and FDIC. |
(c) |
|
Includes off-balance
sheet risk-weighted assets of $391.3 billion, $363.4 billion and $14.0
billion, respectively, at September 30, 2008, and of $352.7 billion, $336.8 billion and $13.4
billion, respectively, at December 31, 2007, for JPMorgan Chase and its significant banking
subsidiaries. |
55
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Adjusted average assets, for purposes of calculating the leverage ratio, include total
average assets adjusted for unrealized gains/losses on securities, less deductions for
disallowed goodwill and other intangible assets, investments in certain subsidiaries and the
total adjusted carrying value of nonfinancial equity investments that are subject to
deductions from Tier 1 capital. |
(e) |
|
Represents requirements for banking subsidiaries pursuant to regulations issued under the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act. There is no Tier 1 leverage component
in the definition of a well-capitalized bank holding company. |
(f) |
|
The minimum Tier 1 leverage ratio for bank holding companies and banks is 3% or 4% depending
on factors specified in regulations issued by the Federal Reserve and OCC. |
Note: |
|
Rating agencies allow measures of capital to be adjusted upward for deferred tax liabilities
which have resulted from both nontaxable business combinations and from tax deductible
goodwill. The Firm had deferred tax liabilities resulting from nontaxable business
combinations totaling $1.8 billion at September 30, 2008, and $2.0 billion at December 31,
2007. Additionally, the Firm had deferred tax liabilities resulting from tax deductible
goodwill of $1.3 billion at September 30, 2008, and $939 million at December 31, 2007.
|
The
Firms Tier 1 capital was $111.6 billion at September 30, 2008, compared with $88.7
billion at December 31, 2007, an increase of $22.9 billion. The increase was due primarily to an
issuance of common stock of $11.5 billion, issuances of preferred stock of
$8.2 billion, net issuances of common stock under the Firms employee stock-based compensation
plans of $2.7 billion, net issuances of common stock in connection with the Bear Stearns merger of
$1.2 billion, net income of $4.9 billion and net issuances of qualifying trust preferred capital
debt securities of $2.6 billion. These increases were partially offset by decreases in
stockholders equity net of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), primarily due to
dividends declared of $4.4 billion, a $783 million increase in the deduction for goodwill and
other nonqualifying intangibles, a $548 million increase in the deduction for disallowed servicing
assets and purchased credit card relationships and a $2.0 billion (after-tax) increase in the
valuation adjustment to certain liabilities to reflect the credit quality of the Firm. Additional
information regarding the Firms capital ratios and the federal regulatory capital standards to
which it is subject is presented in Note 28 on pages 166167 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual
Report.
Capital Purchase Program
Pursuant to the Capital Purchase Program, on October 28, 2008, the Firm issued to the U.S.
Treasury, in exchange for aggregate consideration of $25.0 billion, (i) 2.5 million shares of Series
K Preferred Stock, and (ii) a Warrant to purchase up to 88,401,697 shares of the Firms common
stock, at an exercise price of $42.42 per share, subject to certain anti-dilution and other
adjustments. The Series K Preferred Stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital.
The Series K Preferred Stock bears cumulative dividends at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years and 9% per annum thereafter, in each case, applied to the
liquidation preference thereof, but will only be paid when, as and if declared by the Firms Board
of Directors out of funds legally available therefor. The
Series K Preferred Stock ranks pari
passu with the Firms existing 6.15% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series E, 5.72% Cumulative
Preferred Stock, Series F, 5.49% Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series G, Fixed-to-Floating Rate
Non-cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series I and 8.63% Non-cumulative Perpetual Preferred
Stock, Series J, in terms of dividend payments and distributions upon liquidation, dissolution and
winding up of the Firm.
For as long as any shares of Series K Preferred Stock are outstanding, no dividends may be declared
or paid on junior preferred shares, preferred shares ranking pari passu with the Series K Preferred
Stock, or common stock (other than in the case of pari passu preferred shares, dividends on a pro
rata basis with the Series K Preferred Stock), unless all accrued and unpaid dividends for all past
dividend periods on the Series K Preferred Stock are fully paid. The U.S. Treasurys consent is
required for any increase in dividends on common stock from the amount of the Firms quarterly
stock dividend of $0.38 per share, payable on October 31, 2008 until the third anniversary of the
purchase agreement with the U.S. Treasury unless prior to such third anniversary the
Series K Preferred Stock is redeemed in whole or the U.S. Treasury has transferred all of the
Series K Preferred Stock to third parties.
The Firm may not repurchase or redeem any junior preferred shares, preferred shares ranking pari
passu with the Series K Preferred Stock or common stock without the prior consent of the U.S.
Treasury (other than (i) repurchases of the Series K Preferred Stock and (ii) repurchases of junior
preferred shares or common stock in connection with any employee benefit plan in the ordinary course of
business consistent with past practice) until the third anniversary
of the purchase agreement with the U.S. Treasury unless prior to such third anniversary the Series K Preferred
Stock is redeemed in whole or the U.S. Treasury has transferred all of the Series K Preferred Stock
to third parties.
56
Basel II
The minimum risk-based capital requirements adopted by the U.S. federal banking agencies follow the
Capital Accord of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. In 2004, the Basel Committee
published a revision to the Accord (Basel II), and in December 2007, U.S. banking regulators
published a final Basel II rule. The final U.S. rule will require JPMorgan Chase to implement Basel
II at the holding company level, as well as at certain key U.S. bank subsidiaries. The U.S.
implementation timetable consists of a qualification period, starting any time between April 1,
2008, and April 1, 2010, followed by a minimum transition period of three years. During the
transition period, Basel II risk-based capital requirements cannot fall below certain floors based
upon current (Basel I) regulations. JPMorgan Chase expects to be in compliance with all relevant
Basel II rules within the established timelines. In addition, the Firm has adopted, and will
continue to adopt, based upon various established timelines, Basel II rules in certain non-U.S.
jurisdictions, as required. Equity requirements calculated in
accordance with Basel II are expected to be dynamic over time because the
drivers of such equity requirements are a reflection of the Firms risk profile and balance sheet composition. For additional
information, see Basel II, on page 65 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
Broker-dealer regulatory capital
JPMorgan Chases principal U.S. broker-dealer subsidiaries are J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
(JPMorgan Securities) and Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc.
(Bear Stearns & Co.). JPMorgan Securities and
Bear Stearns & Co. are each subject to Rule 15c3-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Net
Capital Rule). Bear Stearns & Co. is also registered as futures commissions merchants and subject
to Rule 1.17 under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
JPMorgan Securities and Bear Stearns & Co. have elected to compute their minimum net capital
requirements in accordance with the minimum net capital requirements of the Net Capital Rule. At
September 30, 2008, JPMorgan Securities net capital, as defined by the Net Capital Rule, of $5
billion exceeded the minimum requirement by $4.1 billion and Bear Stearns & Co.s net capital of
$5.1 billion exceeded the minimum requirement by $4.5 billion. In addition to its net capital
requirements, JPMorgan Securities and Bear Stearns & Co. are required to hold tentative net capital
in excess of $1 billion and are also required to notify the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in the event that tentative net
capital is less than $5 billion in accordance with the market and credit risk standards of Appendix
E of the Net Capital Rule. As of September 30, 2008, JPMorgan Securities and Bear Stearns & Co. had
tentative net capital in excess of the minimum and the notification requirements. The Firm merged
JPMorgan Securities Inc. and Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. on October 1, 2008, and the surviving entity
is named J.P. Morgan Securities Inc.
Dividends
The Firms common stock dividend policy reflects JPMorgan Chases earnings outlook, desired
dividend payout ratios, need to maintain an adequate capital level and alternative investment
opportunities. The Firm continues to target a dividend payout ratio of approximately 30-40% of net
income over time. On September 16, 2008, the Firm declared a quarterly common stock dividend of
$0.38 per share, payable on October 31, 2008, to shareholders of record at the close of business on
October 6, 2008. The Purchase Agreement concerning the issuance and sale of the Series K Preferred
Stock to the U.S. Treasury contains limitations on the payment of dividends on the Firms capital
stock. See the dividend restrictions discussion on page 56 of this Form 10-Q.
57
Issuance
The Firm issued $6.0 billion and $1.8 billion of noncumulative perpetual preferred stock on April
23, 2008 and August 21, 2008, respectively. The proceeds were used for general corporate purposes.
For additional information regarding preferred stock, see Note 22 on pages 141142 of this Form
10-Q.
On September 30, 2008, the Firm issued $11.5 billion, or 284 million shares, of common stock at
$40.50 per share. The proceeds from this issuance were used for general corporate purposes.
Stock repurchases
For a discussion of the Firms current stock repurchase program, see Stock repurchases on page 65
of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008, the Firm
did not repurchase any shares. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2007, under the
respective stock repurchase programs then in effect, the Firm repurchased a total of 47 million and
165 million shares for $2.1 billion and $8.0 billion, respectively, at an average price per share
of $45.42 and $48.67, respectively. As of September 30, 2008, $6.2 billion of authorized repurchase
capacity remained under the current $10.0 billion stock repurchase program. For additional
information regarding repurchases of the Firms equity securities, see Part II, Item 2,
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds, on pages 167168 of this Form 10-Q.
The current $10.0 billion authorization to repurchase stock will be utilized at managements
discretion, and the timing of purchases and the exact number of shares purchased will depend on
market conditions and alternative investment opportunities. The repurchase program does not include
specific price targets or timetables; may be executed through open market purchases, privately
negotiated transactions or utilizing Rule 10b5-1 programs; and may be suspended at any time. The
Purchase Agreement concerning the issuance and sale of the
Series K Preferred Stock to the U.S. Treasury contains limitations on the Firms ability to repurchase its capital stock. See the stock
repurchase restrictions discussion on page 56 of this Form 10-Q.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL CASH OBLIGATIONS
JPMorgan Chase has several types of off-balance sheet arrangements, including arrangements
with special purpose entities (SPEs) and issuance of lending-related financial instruments (e.g.,
commitments and guarantees). For further discussion of contractual cash obligations, see
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Cash Obligations on page 67 of JPMorgan Chases 2007
Annual Report.
Special-purpose
entities
The basic SPE structure involves a company selling assets to the SPE. The
SPE funds the purchase of those assets by issuing securities to investors in the form of commercial
paper, short-term asset-backed notes, medium-term notes and other forms of interest. SPEs are
generally structured to insulate investors from claims on the SPEs assets by creditors of other
entities, including the creditors of the seller of the assets.
JPMorgan Chase uses SPEs as a source of liquidity for itself and its clients by securitizing
financial assets, and by creating investment products for clients. The Firm is involved with SPEs
through multi-seller conduits and investor intermediation activities, and as a result of its loan
securitizations through qualifying special purpose entities (QSPEs). For a detailed discussion of
all SPEs with which the Firm is involved, and the related accounting, see Note 1 on page 108, Note
16 on pages 139145 and Note 17 on pages 146154 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
The Firm holds capital, as deemed appropriate, against all SPE-related transactions and related
exposures, such as derivative transactions and lending-related commitments and guarantees.
Implications of a credit rating downgrade to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
For certain liquidity commitments to SPEs, the Firm could be required to provide funding if the
short-term credit rating of JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., was downgraded below specific levels,
primarily P-1, A-1 and F1 for Moodys, Standard & Poors and Fitch, respectively. The amount
of these liquidity commitments was $65.0 billion and $94.0 billion at September 30, 2008, and
December 31, 2007, respectively. Alternatively, if JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., were downgraded, the
Firm could be replaced by another liquidity provider in lieu of providing funding under the
liquidity commitments, or in certain circumstances, the Firm could facilitate the sale or
refinancing of the assets in the SPE in order to provide liquidity. These commitments are included
in other unfunded commitments to extend credit and asset purchase agreements, as shown in the
Off-balance sheet lending-related financial instruments and guarantees table on page 60 of this
Form 10-Q.
58
Special-purpose
entities revenue
The following table summarizes certain revenue information related
to consolidated and nonconsolidated VIEs and QSPEs with which the Firm has significant involvement.
The revenue reported in the table below predominantly represents contractual servicing and credit
fee income (i.e., income from acting as administrator, structurer, or liquidity provider). It does
not include mark-to-market gains and losses from changes in the fair value of trading positions
(such as derivative transactions) entered into with VIEs. Those gains and losses are recorded in
principal transactions revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from VIEs and QSPEs |
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VIEs:(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-seller conduits |
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
205 |
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
Investor intermediation |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total VIEs |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
QSPEs |
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
865 |
|
|
|
3,031 |
|
|
|
2,552 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,137 |
|
|
$ |
921 |
|
|
$ |
3,247 |
|
|
$ |
2,710 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes revenue associated with consolidated VIEs and significant nonconsolidated VIEs. |
American
Securitization Forum subprime adjustable rate mortgage loans
modifications
In December
2007, the American Securitization Forum (ASF) issued the Streamlined Foreclosure and Loss
Avoidance Framework for Securitized Subprime Adjustable Rate Mortgage Loans (the Framework). The
Framework provides guidance for servicers to streamline evaluation procedures of borrowers with
certain subprime adjustable rate mortgage (ARM) loans in order to more quickly and efficiently
provide modification of such loans with terms that are more appropriate for the individual needs of
such borrowers. The Framework applies to all first-lien subprime ARM loans that have a fixed rate
of interest for an initial period of 36 months or less; are included in securitized pools; were
originated between January 1, 2005, and July 31, 2007; and have an initial interest rate reset date
between January 1, 2008, and July 31, 2010. JPMorgan Chase has adopted the Framework, and during
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, had modified $155 million and $991 million,
respectively, of Segment 2 subprime mortgage loans. The table below presents selected information
relating to Segment 3 loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
(in millions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan modifications |
|
$ |
719 |
|
|
$ |
1,243 |
|
Other loss mitigation activities |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
Prepayments |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For additional discussion of the Framework, see Note 16 on pages 124130 of this Form 10-Q
and Note 16 on page 145 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
Off-balance sheet lending-related financial instruments and guarantees
JPMorgan Chase utilizes lending-related financial instruments (e.g., commitments and guarantees) to
meet the financing needs of its customers. The contractual amount of these financial instruments
represents the maximum possible credit risk should the counterparty draw down the commitment or the
Firm be required to fulfill its obligation under the guarantee, and the counterparty subsequently
fail to perform according to the terms of the contract. These commitments and guarantees
historically expire without being drawn and even higher proportions expire without a default. As a
result, the total contractual amount of these instruments is not, in the Firms view,
representative of its actual future credit exposure or funding requirements. Further, certain
commitments, primarily related to consumer financings, are cancelable, upon notice, at the Firms
option. For further discussion of lending-related commitments and guarantees and the Firms
accounting for them, see Note 29 on pages 146148 of this Form 10-Q, Credit Risk Management on
pages 7389 and Note 31 on pages 170173 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
59
The
following table presents off-balance sheet lending-related financial
instruments and guarantees
for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
Dec. 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after |
|
|
Due after |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 year |
|
|
3 years |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By remaining maturity |
|
Due in 1 |
|
|
through |
|
|
through |
|
|
Due after |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
year or less |
|
|
3 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lending-related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer(a) |
|
$ |
808,859 |
|
|
$ |
4,291 |
|
|
$ |
8,300 |
|
|
$ |
89,458 |
|
|
$ |
910,908 |
|
|
$ |
815,936 |
|
Wholesale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfunded commitments to extend credit(b)(c)(d)(e) |
|
|
97,810 |
|
|
|
73,373 |
|
|
|
64,327 |
|
|
|
12,568 |
|
|
|
248,078 |
|
|
|
250,954 |
|
Asset purchase agreements(f) |
|
|
19,838 |
|
|
|
26,370 |
|
|
|
12,380 |
|
|
|
885 |
|
|
|
59,473 |
|
|
|
90,105 |
|
Standby
letters of credit and guarantees(c)(g)(h) |
|
|
27,201 |
|
|
|
28,089 |
|
|
|
33,467 |
|
|
|
5,248 |
|
|
|
94,005 |
|
|
|
100,222 |
|
Other letters of credit(c) |
|
|
5,102 |
|
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
6,267 |
|
|
|
5,371 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total wholesale |
|
|
149,951 |
|
|
|
128,788 |
|
|
|
110,365 |
|
|
|
18,719 |
|
|
|
407,823 |
|
|
|
446,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total lending-related |
|
$ |
958,810 |
|
|
$ |
133,079 |
|
|
$ |
118,665 |
|
|
$ |
108,177 |
|
|
$ |
1,318,731 |
|
|
$ |
1,262,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other guarantees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities lending guarantees(i) |
|
$ |
270,182 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
270,182 |
|
|
$ |
385,758 |
|
Derivatives qualifying as guarantees(j) |
|
|
27,037 |
|
|
|
28,975 |
|
|
|
13,166 |
|
|
|
33,632 |
|
|
|
102,810 |
|
|
|
85,262 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included credit card and
home equity lending-related commitments of $784.9 billion and
$97.1 billion, respectively, at September 30, 2008, and $714.8 billion and $74.2 billion,
respectively, at December 31, 2007. These amounts for credit card and home equity
lending-related commitments represent the total available credit for these products. The Firm
has not experienced, and does not anticipate, that all available lines of credit for these
products will be utilized at the same time. For credit card commitments and if certain
conditions are met for home equity commitments, the Firm can reduce or cancel these lines of
credit by providing the borrower prior notice or, in some cases, without notice as permitted
by law. |
(b) |
|
Included unused advised lines of credit totaling $34.2 billion at September 30, 2008, and
$38.4 billion at December 31, 2007, which are not legally binding. In regulatory filings with
the Federal Reserve, unused advised lines are not reportable. See the Glossary of Terms
on page 130 of this Form 10-Q for the Firms definition of advised lines of credit. |
(c) |
|
Represents contractual amount net of risk participations totaling $29.2 billion and $28.3
billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(d) |
|
Excluded unfunded commitments to third-party private equity funds of $931 million and $881
million at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. Also excluded unfunded
commitments for other equity investments of $865 million and $903 million at September 30,
2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(e) |
|
Included in unfunded commitments to extend credit are commitments to investment and
noninvestment grade counterparties in connection with leveraged acquisitions of $5.9 billion
and $8.2 billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(f) |
|
Largely represents asset purchase agreements to the Firms administered multi-seller,
asset-backed commercial paper conduits. The maturity is based upon the weighted-average
expected life of the underlying assets in the SPE, which are based upon the remainder of each
conduit transactions committed liquidity plus either the expected weighted average life of
the assets should the committed liquidity expire without renewal, or the expected time to sell
the underlying assets in the securitization market. It also includes $221 million and $1.1
billion of asset purchase agreements to other third-party entities at September 30, 2008, and
December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(g) |
|
JPMorgan Chase held collateral relating to $19.0 billion and $15.8 billion of these
arrangements at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(h) |
|
Included unused commitments to issue standby letters of credit of $40.9 billion and $50.7
billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(i) |
|
Collateral held by the Firm in support of securities lending indemnification agreements was
$275.0 billion at September 30, 2008, and $390.5 billion at December 31, 2007, respectively.
Securities lending collateral is comprised primarily of cash, Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and Development (OECD) government securities and U.S. agency securities. |
(j) |
|
Represents notional amounts of derivatives qualifying as guarantees. For further discussion
of guarantees, see Note 31 on pages 170173 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report. |
RISK MANAGEMENT
Risk is an inherent part of JPMorgan Chases business activities. The Firms risk management
framework and governance structure are intended to provide comprehensive controls and ongoing
management of the major risks inherent in its business activities. In addition, this framework
recognizes the diversity among the Firms core businesses, which helps reduce the impact of
volatility in any particular area on the Firms operating results as a whole. There are eight major
risk types identified in the business activities of the Firm: liquidity risk, credit risk, market
risk, interest rate risk, operational risk, legal and reputation risk, fiduciary risk and private
equity risk.
For further discussion of these risks, see pages 6995 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report and
the information below.
60
LIQUIDITY RISK MANAGEMENT
The following discussion of JPMorgan Chases liquidity management framework highlights
developments since December 31, 2007, and should be read in conjunction with pages 7073 of
JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
Liquidity risk arises from the general funding needs of the Firms activities and in the management
of its assets and liabilities. JPMorgan Chases liquidity management framework is intended to
maximize liquidity access and minimize funding costs. Management uses a variety of tools, which
together provide an overall liquidity perspective, to monitor and manage liquidity risk. Through
active liquidity management, the Firm seeks to preserve stable, reliable and cost-effective sources
of funding to meet actual and contingent liquidity needs over time. This access enables the Firm to
replace maturing obligations when due and fund assets at appropriate maturities and rates.
The diversity of the Firms funding sources enhances financial flexibility and limits dependence on
any one source. Funding flexibility results from the Firms ability to access both unsecured and
secured funding markets globally. Decisions concerning the timing and tenor of accessing these
markets are based upon relative costs, general market conditions, prevailing interest rates,
prospective views of balance sheet growth and the desired maturity profile of liabilities. The
Firms funding is managed centrally, using regional expertise and local market access as
appropriate. Markets are evaluated on an ongoing basis to achieve an appropriate global balance of
unsecured and secured funding at favorable rates. Diversification of funding is a critical
component of the Firms liquidity risk management strategy.
Recent events
During the third quarter and continuing into the fourth quarter to date, global markets have
exhibited extraordinary levels of volatility and increasing signs of stress. During the period, the
Firm has experienced constrained or inconsistent access to wholesale
long-term funding
markets (e.g., term securities financings, long-term debt and consumer loan securitizations). At
the same time, the Firms deposits (excluding those assumed in connection with the acquisition of
Washington Mutuals banking operations) have increased substantially, predominantly due to net
increases in wholesale interest- and noninterest-bearing deposits in
Treasury & Securities Services. The increase in TSS was driven by both new and existing
clients, and due to the heightened volatility and credit
concerns in the global markets.
In response to these circumstances, the United States government, particularly the U.S. Treasury,
the Federal Reserve and the FDIC, working in cooperation with foreign
governments and other central banks, including the Bank of England, the European Central Bank and
the Swiss National Bank, have taken a variety of extraordinary measures designed to restore
confidence in the financial markets and to strengthen financial institutions, including capital
injections, guarantees of bank liabilities and the acquisition of
illiquid assets from banks. For a further discussion of these
responses, see Recent Market Developments on pages
78 of this Form 10-Q.
As part of the acquisition of Washington Mutuals banking operations, JPMorgan Chase assumed
Washington Mutuals deposits as well as its covered bond and
liabilities to certain Federal Home Loan Banks. The acquisition of Washington Mutuals banking operations had an insignificant impact on the Firms
overall liquidity position. For the immediate future, the Firm does not intend to issue new covered
bonds via the heritage Washington Mutual covered bond program, under which a statutory trust,
established by Washington Mutual, issued floating-rate mortgage bonds secured by loans in its
mortgage portfolio. Following the Washington Mutual transaction, JPMorgan Bank and Trust
Company, National Association, a recently formed, wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of JPMorgan
Chase became a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. In addition to its current
access to Federal Home Loan Bank funding through its memberships in the Federal Home Loan Bank of
Chicago and the Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh, the Firm will have the ability to borrow from
the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco via this newly formed subsidiary.
61
As of September 30, 2008, the Firms liquidity position remained strong based upon its liquidity
metrics. JPMorgan Chases long-dated funding, including core liabilities, exceeded illiquid assets
and the Firm believes its obligations can be met even if access to funding is impaired. Consistent
with its liquidity management policy, the Firm has raised funds at the parent holding company in
excess of its target to cover its obligations and those of its nonbank subsidiaries that mature
over the next 12 months. For bank subsidiaries, the focus of liquidity risk management is on
maintaining unsecured and secured funding capacity sufficient to meet on- and off- balance sheet
obligations.
Funding
Sources of funds
The deposits held by the RFS, CB, TSS and AM lines of business are generally a consistent source of
funding for JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. As of September 30, 2008, total deposits for the Firm were
$969.8 billion. A significant portion of the Firms deposits are retail deposits, which are less
sensitive to interest rate changes or market volatility and therefore are considered more stable
than market-based (i.e., wholesale) liability balances. Through the normal course of business and
independent from the recent deposit inflows which resulted from heightened volatility and credit
concerns, the Firm benefits from substantial liability balances originated by RFS, CB, TSS and AM.
Liability balances include deposits and deposits that are swept to on-balance sheet liabilities
(e.g., commercial paper, federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase
agreements). These franchise-generated liability balances are also a stable and consistent source
of funding due to the nature of the businesses from which they are generated. For further
discussions of deposit and liability balance trends, see the discussion of the results for the
Firms business segments and the Balance Sheet Analysis on pages 2246 and 5153, respectively,
of this Form 10-Q.
Additional sources of funding include a variety of unsecured short- and long-term instruments,
including federal funds purchased, commercial paper, bank notes, long-term debt, trust preferred
capital debt securities, preferred stock and common stock. Secured sources of funding include
securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements, asset securitizations, covered bonds and
borrowings from Federal Home Loan Banks. The ability to securitize loans, and the associated gains
on those securitizations, are principally dependent upon the credit quality and yields of the assets
securitized (and not on the credit ratings of the issuing entity) as well as upon prevailing market
conditions. Given the volatility and stress in the financial markets in the third quarter of 2008,
issuances of debt and securitized notes by the Firm have been more constrained than in prior
periods. Transactions between the Firm and its securitization structures are reflected in JPMorgan
Chases consolidated financial statements and notes to the consolidated financial statements; these
relationships include retained interests in securitization trusts, liquidity facilities and
derivative transactions. For further details, see Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual
Cash Obligations and Notes 16 and 29 on pages 5860, 124130 and 146148, respectively, of this
Form 10-Q.
Issuance
During the third quarter of 2008, JPMorgan Chase issued approximately $9.4 billion, $1.8 billion
and $11.5 billion, respectively, of long-term debt and trust preferred capital debt securities,
preferred stock and common stock. The long-term debt issuances included $7.0 billion of IB
structured notes, the issuances of which are generally client-driven and not for funding or capital
management purposes as the proceeds from such transactions are generally used to purchase
securities to mitigate the risk associated with structured note exposure. The issuances of
long-term debt and trust preferred capital debt securities were more than offset by $20.3 billion
of such securities that matured or were redeemed during the third quarter of 2008, including $8.3
billion of IB structured notes. In addition, during the third quarter of 2008, the Firm securitized
$6.1 billion of credit card loans.
During the first nine months of 2008, the Firm issued approximately $47.6 billion, $7.8 billion and
$11.5 billion, respectively, of long-term debt and trust preferred capital debt securities,
preferred stock and common stock. The long-term debt issuances included $23.9 billion of IB
structured notes. The issuances of long-term debt and trust preferred capital debt securities were
more than offset by $50.3 billion of such securities that matured or were redeemed during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, including $27.1 billion of IB structured notes. During the first
nine months of 2008, the Firm securitized $21.4 billion of credit card loans. For further
discussion of loan securitizations, see Note 16 on pages 124130 of this Form 10-Q.
In connection with the issuance of certain of its trust preferred capital debt securities and its
noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, the Firm has entered into Replacement Capital Covenants
(RCCs) granting certain rights to the holder of covered debt, as defined in the RCCs, that
prohibit the repayment, redemption or purchase of such trust preferred capital debt securities and
noncumulative perpetual preferred stock except, with limited exceptions, to the extent that
JPMorgan Chase has received, in each such case, specified amounts of proceeds from the sale of
certain qualifying securities. Currently the Firms covered debt is its 5.875% Junior Subordinated
Deferrable Interest Debentures, Series O, due in 2035. For more information regarding these
covenants, reference is made to the respective RCCs entered into by
62
the Firm in connection with the issuances of such trust preferred capital debt securities and
noncumulative perpetual preferred stock, which are filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange
Commission under cover of Forms 8-K.
Cash Flows
Cash and due from banks was $54.4 billion and $32.8 billion at September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. These balances increased $14.2 billion and declined $7.6 billion, respectively, from
December 31, 2007 and 2006. The following discussion highlights the major activities and
transactions that affected JPMorgan Chases cash flows during the first nine months of 2008 and
2007.
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
JPMorgan Chases operating assets and liabilities vary significantly in the normal course of
business due to the amount and timing of cash flows. Management believes cash flows from
operations, available cash balances and the Firms ability to generate cash through short- and
long-term borrowings and issuances of preferred and common stock will be sufficient to fund the
Firms operating liquidity needs.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, net cash provided by operating activities was $32.4
billion, largely reflecting higher net payables in IBs prime
services business due to the Bear
Stearns merger. In addition, net cash generated from operating activities was higher than net
income largely as a result of adjustments for operating items such as the provision for credit
losses, depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation, certain other expense and gains or
losses from sales of investment securities. Proceeds from sales of loans originated or purchased
with an initial intent to sell was slightly higher than cash used to acquire such loans, but the
cash flows from these loan sales activities were at a much lower level than for the same period in
2007 as a result of the current market conditions that have continued since the last half of 2007.
Operating cash flows also reflected the Firms capital markets
activities.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, net cash used in operating activities was $81.3
billion, which supported growth in the Firms capital markets and certain lending activities during
the period. The net use of cash was partially offset by proceeds from sales of loans originated or
purchased with an initial intent to sell, which were slightly higher than cash used to acquire such
loans.
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
The Firms investing activities primarily include originating loans to be held to maturity, other
receivables, and the available-for-sale investment portfolio. For the nine months ended September
30, 2008, net cash of $219.5 billion was used in investing activities, primarily for purchases of
investment securities in Corporates AFS portfolio to manage the Firms exposure to interest rates;
net additions to the wholesale loan portfolio, from increased lending activities across all the
wholesale businesses; additions to the consumer prime mortgage portfolio as a result of the
decision to retain, rather than sell, new originations of nonconforming prime mortgage loans; an
increase in securities purchased under resale agreements reflecting growth in demand from clients
for liquidity; the purchase of asset-backed commercial paper from money market mutual funds in
connection with a special Federal Reserve Bank of Boston lending facility; and to increase deposits
with banks as the result of the availability of excess cash for short-term investment
opportunities. Partially offsetting these uses of cash were proceeds from sales and maturities of
AFS securities; credit card securitization activities; and net cash received from acquisitions and
the sale of an investment. Additionally, in June 2008, in connection with the merger with Bear
Stearns, the Firm sold assets acquired from Bear Stearns to the FRBNY and received cash proceeds of
$28.85 billion.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2007, net cash of $41.3 billion was used in investing
activities, primarily for purchases of investment securities in Corporates AFS portfolio to manage
the Firms exposure to interest rates; net additions to the retained wholesale and consumer
(primarily home equity) loans portfolios; and to increase deposits with banks as the result of the
availability of excess cash for short-term investment opportunities. Partially offsetting these
uses of cash were cash proceeds received from sales and maturities of AFS securities; credit card,
residential mortgage, auto and wholesale loan sales and securitization activities; and the seasonal
decline in consumer credit card receivables.
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
The Firms financing activities primarily reflect cash flows related to customer deposits, issuance of
long-term debt and trust preferred capital debt securities, and issuances of preferred and common
stock. In addition, JPMorgan Chase pays dividends on its preferred and common stock and has a stock
repurchase program. In the first nine months of 2008, net cash provided by financing activities was
$201.7 billion due to growth in wholesale deposits, in particular, interest- and
non-interest-bearing deposits in TSS driven by both new and existing
clients, and due to
heightened volatility and credit concerns in the global markets; an increase in other borrowings
due to nonrecourse advances from the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston to fund the purchase of
asset-backed commercial paper from money market mutual funds; increases in federal funds purchased
and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements in connection with higher short-term
requirements to fulfill clients demand for liquidity and to finance the Firms AFS securities
inventory levels; and issuances of common stock and preferred stock. Partially offsetting these
cash proceeds was a net decline in long-
63
term debt and trust preferred capital debt securities, as proceeds from new issuances were more
than offset by repayments; and the payment of cash dividends. There were no stock repurchases
during the first nine months of 2008.
In the first nine months of 2007, net cash provided by financing activities was $114.7 billion due
to: a net increase in wholesale deposits from growth in business volumes, in particular,
interest-bearing deposits at TSS and AM; net issuances of long-term debt and trust preferred
capital debt securities to fund certain liquid assets held by the Parent company and to build
liquidity; growth in commercial paper issuances and other borrowed funds to further build
liquidity; and an increase in securities sold under repurchase agreements in connection with the
funding of trading and AFS securities positions. Cash was used to repurchase common stock and pay
cash dividends on common stock (including a 12% increase in the quarterly dividend in the second
quarter of 2007).
Credit ratings
The credit ratings of the parent holding company and each of the Firms significant banking
subsidiaries as of September 30, 2008, were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term debt |
|
Senior long-term debt |
|
|
Moodys |
|
S&P |
|
Fitch |
|
Moodys |
|
S&P |
|
Fitch |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JPMorgan Chase & Co. |
|
P |
-1 |
|
|
|
A-1+ |
|
|
|
F1+ |
|
|
Aa2 |
|
AA- |
|
AA- |
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
|
P |
-1 |
|
|
|
A-1+ |
|
|
|
F1+ |
|
|
Aaa |
|
AA |
|
AA- |
Chase Bank USA, N.A. |
|
P |
-1 |
|
|
|
A-1+ |
|
|
|
F1+ |
|
|
Aaa |
|
AA |
|
AA- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S&P revised its outlook on the Firm to negative from stable
as a result of financial services sector-wide concerns regarding the quality of consumer assets and
Moodys revised its outlook on the Firm to negative from stable based upon its view that JPMorgan
Chases asset quality could potentially deteriorate. Fitch kept its outlook on the Firm at stable.
The cost and availability of unsecured financing are influenced by credit ratings. A reduction in
these ratings could have an adverse effect on the Firms access to liquidity sources, increase the
cost of funds, trigger additional collateral requirements and decrease the number of investors and
counterparties willing to lend. Critical factors in maintaining high credit ratings include a
stable and diverse earnings stream, strong capital ratios, strong credit quality and risk
management controls, diverse funding sources, and disciplined liquidity monitoring procedures.
If the Firms ratings were downgraded by one notch, the Firm estimates the incremental cost of
funds and the potential loss of funding to be negligible. Additionally, the Firm estimates the
additional funding requirements for VIEs and other third-party commitments would not be material.
For additional information on the impact of a credit ratings downgrade on the funding requirements
for VIEs, and on derivatives and collateral agreements, see Special-purpose entities on pages
5859 and Ratings profile of derivative receivables marked-to-market (MTM) on page 70 of this
Form 10-Q.
CREDIT RISK MANAGEMENT
The following pages include a discussion of JPMorgan Chases credit portfolio as of September
30, 2008, highlighting developments since December 31, 2007. This section should be read in
conjunction with pages 7389 and pages 9697 and Notes 14, 15, 31, and 32 of JPMorgan Chases
2007 Annual Report.
The Firm assesses its consumer credit exposure on a managed basis, which includes credit card
receivables that have been securitized. For a reconciliation of the provision for credit losses on
a reported basis to managed basis, see pages 1719 of this Form 10-Q.
CREDIT PORTFOLIO
The following table presents JPMorgan Chases credit portfolio as of September 30, 2008, and
December 31, 2007. Total credit exposure at September 30, 2008, increased $386.0 billion from
December 31, 2007, predominantly reflecting $319.2 billion of credit exposure as the result of the
transaction with Washington Mutual. This exposure consisted of $271.7 billion in the consumer
portfolio and $47.5 billion in the wholesale portfolio, which was primarily commercial lending. The
remaining increase of $66.8 billion reflected higher wholesale exposures of $56.0 billion ($54.3
billion from the second quarter merger with Bear Stearns) and a consumer increase of $10.8 billion.
In the table below, reported loans include loans accounted for at fair value and loans
held-for-sale, which are carried at the lower of cost or fair value with changes in value recorded
in noninterest revenue. However, these held-for-sale loans and loans accounted for at fair value
are excluded from the average loan balances used for the net charge-off rate calculations.
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit exposure |
Nonperforming assets(i)(j) |
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans retained(a) |
|
$ |
742,797 |
|
|
$ |
491,736 |
|
|
$ |
6,901 |
|
|
$ |
3,232 |
|
Loans held-for-sale |
|
|
9,188 |
|
|
|
18,899 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Loans at fair value |
|
|
9,396 |
|
|
|
8,739 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans reported(a) |
|
$ |
761,381 |
|
|
$ |
519,374 |
|
|
$ |
6,933 |
|
|
$ |
3,282 |
|
Loans securitized(b) |
|
|
93,664 |
|
|
|
72,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total managed loans(c) |
|
|
855,045 |
|
|
|
592,075 |
|
|
|
6,933 |
|
|
|
3,282 |
|
Derivative receivables |
|
|
118,648 |
|
|
|
77,136 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Receivables from customers(d) |
|
|
25,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total managed credit-related assets |
|
|
999,115 |
|
|
|
669,211 |
|
|
|
6,978 |
|
|
|
3,311 |
|
Lending-related commitments(e)(f) |
|
|
1,318,731 |
|
|
|
1,262,588 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
Assets acquired in loan satisfactions |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
2,542 |
(k) |
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit portfolio |
|
$ |
2,317,846 |
|
|
$ |
1,931,799 |
|
|
$ |
9,520 |
|
|
$ |
3,933 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net credit derivative hedges
notional(g) |
|
$ |
(88,615 |
) |
|
$ |
(67,999 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
Collateral held against derivatives(h) |
|
|
(13,207 |
) |
|
|
(9,824 |
) |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average annual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average annual |
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
net charge-off rate |
|
Net charge-offs |
|
net charge-off rate |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total credit portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans reported |
|
$ |
2,484 |
|
|
$ |
1,221 |
|
|
|
1.91 |
% |
|
|
1.07 |
% |
|
$ |
6,520 |
|
|
$ |
3,109 |
|
|
|
1.70 |
% |
|
|
0.94 |
% |
Loans securitized(b) |
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
4.43 |
|
|
|
3.34 |
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
4.16 |
|
|
|
3.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total managed loans |
|
$ |
3,357 |
|
|
$ |
1,799 |
|
|
|
2.24 |
% |
|
|
1.37 |
% |
|
$ |
8,904 |
|
|
$ |
4,870 |
|
|
|
2.02 |
% |
|
|
1.28 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Loans are presented net of unearned income and net deferred loan fees of $917 million and
$1.0 billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. Purchased credit
impaired loans acquired in the Washington Mutual transaction are reported at fair value as of
the acquisition date. For additional information, see Note 13 on pages 120122 of this Form
10-Q. |
(b) |
|
Represents securitized credit card receivables. For a further discussion of credit card
securitizations, see Card Services on pages 3336 of this Form 10-Q. |
(c) |
|
Loans past-due 90 days and over and accruing include: credit card receivables reported of
$1.6 billion and $1.5 billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively, and
credit card securitizations of $1.7 billion and $1.1 billion at September 30, 2008, and
December 31, 2007, respectively; and wholesale loans of $90 million and $75 million at
September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(d) |
|
Primarily represents margin loans to prime and retail brokerage customers included in accrued
interest and accounts receivable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
(e) |
|
Included credit card and home equity lending-related commitments of $784.9 billion and $97.1
billion, respectively, at September 30, 2008; and $714.8 billion and $74.2 billion,
respectively, at December 31, 2007. For additional information, see page 75 of this Form 10-Q. |
(f) |
|
Included unused advised lines of credit totaling $34.2 billion and $38.4 billion at September
30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively, which are not legally binding. In regulatory
filings with the Federal Reserve, unused advised lines are not reportable. See the
Glossary of Terms on page 156 of this Form 10-Q for the Firms definition of advised lines of
credit. |
(g) |
|
Represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold of single-name and
portfolio credit derivatives used to manage credit exposures; these derivatives do not qualify
for hedge accounting under SFAS 133. For additional information, see page 68 of this Form
10-Q. |
(h) |
|
Represents other liquid securities-collateral held by the Firm as of September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(i) |
|
Excluded nonperforming assets related to (1) loans eligible for repurchase as well as loans
repurchased from GNMA pools that are insured by U.S. government agencies of $1.8 billion and
$1.5 billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively, and (2) education
loans that are 90 days past due and still accruing, which are insured by U.S. government
agencies under the Federal Family Education Loan Program, of $405 million and $279 million at
September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. These amounts for GNMA and education
loans are excluded, as reimbursement is proceeding normally. |
(j) |
|
Excludes purchased
held-for-sale loans and approximately $6.4 billion of consumer
loans acquired as part of the Washington Mutual transaction that were
nonperforming prior to the transaction closing. The loans acquired from Washington Mutual are considered to be credit impaired and, therefore, are accounted for under SOP 03-3. For additional information, see Note 13 on pages 120-122 of this Form 10-Q.
|
(k) |
|
Included $1.5 billion
of assets acquired in the Washington Mutual transaction.
|
65
WHOLESALE CREDIT PORTFOLIO
As of September 30, 2008, wholesale exposure (IB, CB, TSS and AM) increased $103.5 billion
from December 31, 2007, primarily due to the Bear Stearns merger, which added $54.3 billion in the
second quarter of 2008 ($26.0 billion of receivables from customers, $18.9 billion of derivative
receivables, $5.0 billion of lending-related commitments and $4.4 billion of loans). In addition,
the Washington Mutual transaction added $47.5 billion of exposure, mainly consisting of loans. The remaining
$1.7 billion of the increase was largely driven by an increase of $26.5 billion of loans and $21.5
billion of derivative receivables, partially offset by a decrease of $45.7 billion in
lending-related commitments. The increase in loans was primarily due to lending activity across all
wholesale businesses, particularly in short-term lending and trade finance within TSS. The increase
in derivative receivables was due to the merger with Bear Stearns, as well as the effect of
currency and equity market volatility on foreign exchange and equity derivative receivables. The
decrease in lending-related commitments was largely related to cancellations of multi-seller
conduit-related commitments and, to a much lesser extent, funding of existing commitments. For
additional information regarding conduit-related commitments, see Note 17 on pages 131135 of this
Form 10-Q.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit exposure |
Nonperforming assets |
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans retained(a)(b) |
|
$ |
271,465 |
|
|
$ |
189,427 |
|
|
$ |
1,373 |
|
|
$ |
464 |
|
Loans held-for-sale |
|
|
7,584 |
|
|
|
14,910 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Loans at fair value |
|
|
9,396 |
|
|
|
8,739 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans reported(a) |
|
$ |
288,445 |
|
|
$ |
213,076 |
|
|
$ |
1,405 |
|
|
$ |
514 |
|
Derivative receivables |
|
|
118,648 |
|
|
|
77,136 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Receivables from customers(c) |
|
|
25,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total wholesale credit-related assets |
|
|
432,515 |
|
|
|
290,212 |
|
|
|
1,450 |
|
|
|
543 |
|
Lending-related commitments(d) |
|
|
407,823 |
|
|
|
446,652 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
Assets acquired in loan satisfactions |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
181 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total wholesale credit exposure |
|
$ |
840,338 |
|
|
$ |
736,864 |
|
|
$ |
1,631 |
|
|
$ |
616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net credit derivative hedges notional(e) |
|
$ |
(88,615 |
) |
|
$ |
(67,999 |
) |
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
Collateral held against derivatives(f) |
|
|
(13,207 |
) |
|
|
(9,824 |
) |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes loans greater than or equal to 90 days past due that continue to accrue interest.
The principal balance of these loans totaled $90 million and $75 million at September 30,
2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. Also, see Note 4 on pages 109111 and Note 13 on
pages 120122 of this Form 10-Q. |
(b) |
|
Included at September 30, 2008, $272 million of purchased credit impaired loans that were recorded at fair value, so
an allowance for loan losses was neither created nor carried forward at the transaction date.
For information, see Note 13 on pages 120122 of this Form 10-Q. |
(c) |
|
Primarily represents margin loans to prime and retail brokerage customers which are included
in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
(d) |
|
Included unused advised lines of credit totaling $34.2 billion and $38.4 billion at September
30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively, which are not legally binding. In regulatory
filings with the Federal Reserve, unused advised lines are not reportable. |
(e) |
|
Represents the net notional amount of protection purchased and sold of single-name and
portfolio credit derivatives used to manage credit exposures; these derivatives do not qualify
for hedge accounting under SFAS 133. For additional information, see page 68 of this Form
10-Q. |
(f) |
|
Represents other liquid securities collateral held by the Firm as of September 30, 2008, and
December 31, 2007, respectively. |
The following table presents net charge-offs, which do not include gains from sales of
nonperforming loans, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
Net
charge-offs
Wholesale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans reported |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
Average annual net charge-off rate(a) |
|
|
0.10 |
% |
|
|
0.19 |
% |
|
|
0.12 |
% |
|
|
0.04 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes average wholesale loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value of $18.0 billion
and $17.8 billion for the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $19.6
billion and $15.8 billion year-to-date 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
66
The following table presents the change in the nonperforming loan portfolio for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
Nonperforming loan activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
514 |
|
|
$ |
391 |
|
Additions |
|
|
1,801 |
|
|
|
740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paydowns and other |
|
|
(554 |
) |
|
|
(420 |
) |
Charge-offs |
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
Returned to performing |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
(98 |
) |
Sales |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reductions |
|
|
(910 |
) |
|
|
(704 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net additions (reductions) |
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
1,405 |
|
|
$ |
427 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents summaries of the maturity and ratings profiles of the wholesale
portfolio as of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007. The ratings scale is based upon the
Firms internal risk ratings, which generally correspond to the ratings as defined by S&P and
Moodys.
Wholesale credit exposure maturity and ratings profile
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity profile(d) |
|
Ratings profile |
|
|
|
|
Investment- |
|
|
Noninvestment- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
grade
(IG) |
|
|
grade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2008 |
|
Due in 1 |
|
|
year through |
|
|
Due after |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA/Aaa to |
|
|
BB+/Ba1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total % |
|
(in billions, except ratios) |
|
year or less |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
BBB-/Baa3 |
|
|
& below |
|
|
Total |
|
|
of IG |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
37 |
% |
|
|
40 |
% |
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
184 |
|
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
|
68 |
% |
Derivative receivables |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
80 |
|
Lending-related
commitments |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
342 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
|
Total excluding loans
held-for-sale and
loans at fair value |
|
|
35 |
% |
|
|
49 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
621 |
|
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
$ |
798 |
|
|
|
78 |
% |
Loans held-for-sale and
loans at fair value(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from
customers(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total exposure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net credit derivative
hedges notional(c) |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
76 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
(81 |
) |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
(89 |
) |
|
|
91 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
Maturity profile(d) |
|
Ratings profile |
|
|
|
|
Investment- |
|
|
Noninvestment- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due after 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
grade (IG) |
|
|
grade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007 |
|
Due in 1 |
|
|
year through |
|
|
Due after |
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA/Aaa to |
|
|
BB+/Ba1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total % |
|
(in billions, except ratios) |
|
year or less |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
BBB-/Baa3 |
|
|
& below |
|
|
Total |
|
|
of IG |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
44 |
% |
|
|
45 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
127 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
189 |
|
|
|
67 |
% |
Derivative receivables |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
Lending-related
commitments |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
|
Total excluding loans
held-for-sale and
loans at fair value |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
53 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
571 |
|
|
$ |
142 |
|
|
$ |
713 |
|
|
|
80 |
% |
Loans held-for-sale and
loans at fair value(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total exposure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net credit derivative
hedges notional(c) |
|
|
39 |
% |
|
|
56 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Loans held-for-sale and
loans at fair value relate primarily to syndication loans and loans transferred from the
retained portfolio. |
(b) |
|
Primarily represents margin loans to prime and retail brokerage customers which are
included in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. |
67
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Represents the net notional amounts of protection purchased and sold of single-name and
portfolio credit derivatives used to manage the credit exposures; these derivatives do not
qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS 133. Includes $34.4 billion and $31.1 billion at
September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively, which represents the notional amount
of structured portfolio protection; the Firm retains a first risk of loss on this
portfolio. |
(d) |
|
The maturity profile of loans and lending-related commitments is based upon the remaining
contractual maturity. The maturity profile of derivative receivables is based upon the
maturity profile of average exposure. See page 80 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report for
further discussion of average exposure. |
Wholesale credit exposure selected industry concentration
The Firm focuses on the management and diversification of its industry concentrations, with
particular attention paid to industries with actual or potential credit concerns. At September 30,
2008, the top 10 industries were the same as those at December 31, 2007. The Washington Mutual
transaction added $47.5 billion of exposure, predominantly reflected in the real estate industry
exposure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top 10 industries(a) |
|
Credit |
|
|
% of |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
% of |
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
exposure(d) |
|
|
portfolio |
|
|
exposure(d) |
|
|
portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
83,868 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
$ |
38,295 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
Banks and finance companies |
|
|
73,371 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
65,288 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Asset managers |
|
|
49,759 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
38,554 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Consumer products |
|
|
37,247 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
29,941 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Securities firms and exchanges |
|
|
36,923 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
23,274 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Healthcare |
|
|
35,594 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
30,746 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
State and municipal governments |
|
|
32,329 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
31,425 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Retail and consumer services |
|
|
32,217 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
23,969 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Utilities |
|
|
30,361 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
28,679 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Oil and gas |
|
|
26,108 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
26,082 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
All other(b) |
|
|
360,159 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
376,962 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total excluding loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value |
|
$ |
797,936 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
713,215 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value(c) |
|
|
16,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,649 |
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from customers |
|
|
25,422 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
840,338 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
736,864 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Rankings are based upon exposure at September 30, 2008. |
(b) |
|
For more information on exposures to SPEs included in all other, see Note 17 on pages
131135 of this Form 10-Q. |
(c) |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value relate primarily to syndication loans and loans
transferred from the retained portfolio. |
(d) |
|
Credit exposure is net of risk participations and excludes the benefit of credit derivative
hedges and collateral held against derivative receivables or loans. |
Wholesale criticized exposure
Exposures deemed criticized generally represent a ratings profile similar to a rating of
CCC+/Caa1 and lower, as defined by S&P and Moodys. The total criticized component of the
portfolio, excluding loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value,
increased to $15.9 billion, at
September 30, 2008, from $6.8 billion at year-end 2007. The increase was primarily related to
downgrades within the portfolio, mainly in the IB, as well as the addition of loans acquired as
part of the Washington Mutual transaction.
Wholesale criticized exposure industry concentrations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
December 31, 2007 |
Top 10 industries(a) |
|
Credit |
|
|
% of |
|
|
Credit |
|
|
% of |
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
exposure |
|
|
portfolio |
|
|
exposure |
|
|
portfolio |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
4,192 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
$ |
1,070 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
Banks and finance companies |
|
|
1,955 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
498 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Automotive |
|
|
1,385 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Media |
|
|
1,291 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Building materials/construction |
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
345 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Asset managers |
|
|
687 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Retail and consumer services |
|
|
642 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
550 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Consumer products |
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
Agriculture/paper manufacturing |
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
Insurance |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
All other |
|
|
3,665 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
2,128 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total excluding loans held-for-sale and loans at fair
value |
|
$ |
15,909 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
6,838 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value(b) |
|
|
2,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables from customers |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
18,836 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Rankings are based upon exposure at September 30, 2008. |
(b) |
|
Loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value relate primarily to syndication loans and loans
transferred from the retained portfolio. |
Derivative contracts
In the normal course of business, the Firm uses derivative instruments to meet the needs of
customers; to generate revenue through trading activities; to manage exposure to fluctuations in
interest rates, currencies and other markets; and to manage the Firms credit exposure. The
notional amount of the Firms derivative contracts outstanding significantly exceeded, in the
Firms view, the possible credit losses that could arise from such transactions. For most
derivative transactions, the notional amount does not change hands; it is used simply as a
reference to calculate payments. The appropriate measure of the current credit risk is, in the
Firms view, the mark-to-market value of the contract. For further discussion of these contracts,
see Note 28 on page 145 of this Form 10-Q, and Derivative contracts on pages 7982 and Note 30 on
pages 168169 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
The following table summarizes the aggregate notional amounts and the net derivative receivables
MTM for the periods presented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amounts of derivative contracts |
|
Notional amounts(a) |
(in billions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate and currency swaps(b) |
|
$ |
56,755 |
|
|
$ |
53,458 |
|
Futures and forwards |
|
|
5,983 |
|
|
|
4,548 |
|
Purchased options |
|
|
5,291 |
|
|
|
5,349 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest rate contracts |
|
|
68,029 |
|
|
|
63,355 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit derivatives |
|
|
9,250 |
|
|
|
7,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commodity contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps |
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
275 |
|
Futures and forwards |
|
|
132 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Purchased options |
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commodity contracts |
|
|
604 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Futures and forwards |
|
|
4,223 |
|
|
|
3,424 |
|
Purchased options |
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
906 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total foreign exchange contracts |
|
|
5,327 |
|
|
|
4,330 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity contracts |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swaps |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
Futures and forwards |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
72 |
|
Purchased options |
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity contracts |
|
|
1,046 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative notional amounts |
|
$ |
84,256 |
|
|
$ |
77,249 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents the sum of gross long and gross short third-party notional derivative contracts,
excluding written options and foreign exchange spot contracts. |
(b) |
|
Includes cross currency swap contract notional amounts of $1.8 trillion and $1.4 trillion at
September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative receivables marked-to-market |
|
Derivative receivables MTM |
(in millions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
$ |
38,281 |
|
|
$ |
36,020 |
|
Credit |
|
|
28,446 |
|
|
|
22,083 |
|
Commodity |
|
|
14,268 |
|
|
|
9,419 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
19,264 |
|
|
|
5,616 |
|
Equity |
|
|
18,389 |
|
|
|
3,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total, net of cash collateral |
|
|
118,648 |
|
|
|
77,136 |
|
Liquid securities collateral held against derivative receivables |
|
|
(13,207 |
) |
|
|
(9,824 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total, net of all collateral |
|
$ |
105,441 |
|
|
$ |
67,312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of derivative receivables reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets of $118.6
billion and $77.1 billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively, is the amount
of the MTM or fair value of the derivative contracts after giving effect to legally enforceable
master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the Firm. These amounts on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets represent the cost to the Firm to replace the contracts at current market rates
should the counterparty default. However, in managements view, the appropriate measure of current
69
credit risk should also reflect additional liquid securities held as collateral by the Firm of
$13.2 billion and $9.8 billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively,
resulting in total exposure, net of all collateral, of $105.4 billion and $67.3 billion at
September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. The increase of $38.1 billion in
derivative receivables from December 31, 2007, was due to the merger with Bear Stearns, as well as
the effect of currency and equity market volatility on foreign exchange and equity derivative
receivables, respectively.
At September 30, 2008, the fair value of credit derivative receivables, before the benefit of
liquid securities collateral, was $28.4 billion. The determination of the fair value of credit
derivatives, consistent with all derivatives, includes a credit valuation adjustment (CVA) for counterparty
credit risk. For further discussion of credit valuation adjustments, see Note 3 on pages 98109 of
this Form 10-Q.
The Firm also holds additional collateral delivered by clients at the initiation of transactions.
Though this collateral does not reduce the balances noted in the table above, it is available as
security against potential exposure that could arise should the MTM of the clients derivative
transactions move in the Firms favor. As of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, the Firm
held $22.3 billion and $17.4 billion of this additional collateral, respectively. The derivative
receivables MTM, net of all collateral, also does not include other credit enhancements in the
forms of letters of credit.
The following table summarizes the ratings profile of the Firms derivative receivables MTM, net of
other liquid securities collateral, for the dates indicated.
Ratings profile of derivative receivables MTM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
Rating equivalent |
|
Exposure net of |
|
|
% of exposure |
|
|
Exposure net of |
|
|
% of exposure |
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
all collateral |
|
|
net of all collateral |
|
|
all collateral |
|
|
net of all collateral |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA/Aaa to AA-/Aa3 |
|
$ |
54,053 |
|
|
|
51 |
% |
|
$ |
38,314 |
|
|
|
57 |
% |
A+/A1 to A-/A3 |
|
|
19,054 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
9,855 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
BBB+/Baa1 to BBB-/Baa3 |
|
|
11,765 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
9,335 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
BB+/Ba1 to B-/B3 |
|
|
19,282 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
9,451 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
CCC+/Caa1 and below |
|
|
1,287 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
357 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
105,441 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
67,312 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Firm actively pursues the use of collateral agreements to mitigate counterparty credit
risk in derivatives. The percentage of the Firms derivatives transactions subject to collateral
agreements of 80% as of September 30, 2008, was largely unchanged from 82% at December 31, 2007.
The Firm posted $60.1 billion and $33.5 billion of collateral at September 30, 2008, and December
31, 2007, respectively. Certain derivative and collateral agreements include provisions that
require the counterparty and/or the Firm, upon specified downgrades in their respective credit
ratings, to post collateral for the benefit of the other party. The impact of a single-notch
ratings downgrade to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., from its rating of AA to AA- at September 30,
2008, would have required $867 million of additional collateral to be posted by the Firm. The
impact of a six-notch ratings downgrade (from AA to BBB) would have required $4.3 billion of
additional collateral. Certain derivative contracts also provide for termination of the contract,
generally upon a downgrade of either the Firm or the counterparty, at the then-existing MTM value
of the derivative contracts.
Credit derivatives
Credit derivatives are financial contracts that isolate credit risk from an underlying instrument
(such as a loan or a security) and transfer that risk from one party
(the buyer of protection) to
another (the seller of protection). Under the contract the buyer of protection will pay a premium to
the seller of protection and will be compensated when the entity referenced under the credit
derivative contract experiences a credit event (such as default). As a purchaser of credit
protection JPMorgan Chase has risk that the counterparty providing the credit protection will
default. As a seller of credit protection the Firm has risk that the underlying instrument
referenced in the contract will be subject to a credit event. The following table presents the
Firms notional amounts of credit derivatives protection purchased and sold as of September 30,
2008, and December 31, 2007.
Credit derivative positions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional amount |
|
|
|
Credit portfolio |
|
Dealer/client |
|
|
|
Protection |
|
|
Protection |
|
|
Protection |
|
|
Protection |
|
|
|
|
(in billions) |
|
Purchased(a) |
|
|
sold |
|
|
purchased |
|
|
sold |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
89 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,637 |
|
|
$ |
4,524 |
|
|
$ |
9,250 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
3,999 |
|
|
|
3,896 |
|
|
|
7,967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included $34.4 billion and $31.1 billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
respectively, that represented the notional amount for structured portfolio protection; the
Firm retains a first risk of loss on this portfolio. |
70
Dealer/client
At September 30, 2008, the total notional amount of protection purchased and sold in the
dealer/client business increased $1.3 trillion from year-end 2007 primarily as a result of the
merger with Bear Stearns, partially offset by the impact of industry efforts to reduce offsetting
trade activity.
Within the dealer/client business, the Firm actively manages a portfolio of credit derivatives by
buying and selling credit protection, predominantly on corporate debt obligations. Protection may
be bought or sold on both single names and portfolios of referenced entities. The risk positions
are largely matched as the Firms exposure to a given reference entity under one contract to sell
protection to one counterparty may be offset partially, or entirely, with a contract to purchase
protection from another counterparty on the same underlying instrument. Any residual default
exposure and spread risk is actively managed by the Firms various trading desks. The Firm
mitigates the risk of counterparty default, as noted earlier, through the use of collateral
agreements. In addition, the majority of the Firms counterparties are banks and broker dealers.
Credit portfolio management activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Use of single-name and portfolio credit derivatives |
|
Notional amount of protection purchased |
(in millions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit derivatives used to manage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and lending-related commitments |
|
$ |
79,983 |
|
|
$ |
63,645 |
|
Derivative receivables |
|
|
9,259 |
|
|
|
6,462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(a) |
|
$ |
89,242 |
|
|
$ |
70,107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included $34.4 billion and $31.1 billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
respectively, that represented the notional amount for structured portfolio protection; the
Firm retains a first risk of loss on this portfolio. |
The credit derivatives used by JPMorgan Chase for credit portfolio management activities do
not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS 133, and therefore, effectiveness testing under SFAS
133 is not performed. These derivatives are reported at fair value, with gains and losses
recognized in principal transactions revenue. The MTM value incorporates both the cost of credit
derivative premiums and changes in value due to movement in spreads and credit events; in contrast,
the loans and lending-related commitments being risk-managed are accounted for on an accrual basis.
Loan interest and fees are generally recognized in net interest income, and impairment is
recognized in the provision for credit losses. This asymmetry in accounting treatment, between
loans and lending-related commitments and the credit derivatives utilized in credit portfolio
management activities, causes earnings volatility that is not representative, in the Firms view,
of the true changes in value of the Firms overall credit exposure. The MTM related to the Firms
credit derivatives used for managing credit exposure, as well as the MTM related to the CVA, which reflects the credit quality of derivatives counterparty
exposure, are included in the table below. These results can vary from year to year due to market
conditions that impact specific positions in the portfolio. For a discussion of CVA related to
derivative contracts, see Derivative receivables MTM on pages 8081 of
JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedges of lending-related commitments(a) |
|
$ |
269 |
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
447 |
|
|
$ |
112 |
|
CVA and hedges of CVA(a) |
|
|
(702 |
) |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
(1,285 |
) |
|
|
(186 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gains (losses)(b) |
|
$ |
(433 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(838 |
) |
|
$ |
(74 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
These hedges do not qualify for hedge accounting under SFAS 133. |
(b) |
|
Excludes gains of
$604 million and $101 million for the quarters ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $2.0 billion
and $312 million of gains year-to-date 2008 and 2007,
respectively, of other principal transaction revenue that are not
associated with hedging activities. |
The Firm also actively manages wholesale credit exposure through IB and CB loan and commitment
sales. During the first nine months of 2008 and 2007, the Firm sold $3.3 billion and $4.2 billion
of loans and commitments, recognizing losses of $29 million and $7 million, respectively. These
results include gains or losses on sales of nonperforming loans, if any, as discussed on page 66 of
this Form 10-Q. These activities are not related to the Firms securitization activities, which are
undertaken for liquidity and balance sheet management purposes. For further discussion of
securitization activity, see Liquidity Risk Management and Note 16 on
pages 6164 and 124130, respectively, of this Form 10-Q.
71
Lending-related commitments
Wholesale lending-related commitments were $407.8 billion at September 30, 2008, compared with
$446.7 billion at December 31, 2007. See page 66 of this Form 10-Q for an explanation of the
decrease in exposure. In the Firms view, the total contractual amount of these instruments is not
representative of the Firms actual credit risk exposure or funding requirements. In determining
the amount of credit risk exposure the Firm has to wholesale lending-related commitments, which is
used as the basis for allocating credit risk capital to these instruments, the Firm has established
a loan-equivalent amount for each commitment; this amount represents the portion of the unused
commitment or other contingent exposure that is expected, based upon average portfolio historical
experience, to become drawn upon in an event of a default by an obligor. The loan-equivalent amount
of the Firms lending-related commitments was $213.3 billion and $238.7 billion as of September 30,
2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively.
Emerging markets country exposure
The Firm has a comprehensive internal process for measuring and managing exposures to emerging
markets countries. There is no common definition of emerging markets but the Firm generally
includes in its definition those countries whose sovereign debt ratings are equivalent to A+ or
lower. Exposures to a country include all credit-related lending, trading and investment
activities, whether cross-border or locally funded. In addition to monitoring country exposures,
the Firm uses stress tests to measure and manage the risk of extreme loss associated with sovereign
crises.
The table below presents the Firms exposure to its top five emerging markets countries. The
selection of countries is based solely on the Firms largest total exposures by country and not the
Firms view of any actual or potentially adverse credit conditions. Exposure is reported based upon
the country where the assets of the obligor, counterparty or guarantor are located. Exposure
amounts are adjusted for collateral and for credit enhancements (e.g., guarantees and letters of
credit) provided by third parties; outstandings supported by a guarantor located outside the
country or backed by collateral held outside the country are assigned to the country of the
enhancement provider. In addition, the effect of credit derivative hedges and other short credit or
equity trading positions are reflected in the table below. Total exposure includes exposure to both
government and private sector entities in a country.
Top 5 emerging markets country exposure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2008 |
|
Cross-border |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
(in billions) |
|
Lending(a) |
|
|
Trading(b) |
|
|
Other(c) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Local(d) |
|
|
exposure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Korea |
|
$ |
3.1 |
|
|
$ |
5.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
$ |
9.2 |
|
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
12.2 |
|
India |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
Brazil |
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
(1.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
China |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
Taiwan |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007 |
|
Cross-border |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
(in billions) |
|
Lending(a) |
|
|
Trading(b) |
|
|
Other(c) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Local(d) |
|
|
exposure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
South Korea |
|
$ |
3.2 |
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
9.9 |
|
Brazil |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
(0.7 |
) |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
Russia |
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
India |
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
China |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Lending includes loans and accrued interest receivable, interest-bearing deposits with
banks, acceptances, other monetary assets, issued letters of credit net of participations, and
undrawn commitments to extend credit. |
(b) |
|
Trading includes (1) issuer exposure on cross-border debt and equity instruments, held both
in trading and investment accounts, adjusted for the impact of issuer hedges, including credit
derivatives; and (2) counterparty exposure on derivative and foreign exchange contracts as
well as security financing trades (resale agreements and securities borrowed). |
(c) |
|
Other represents mainly local exposure funded cross-border. |
(d) |
|
Local exposure is defined as exposure to a country denominated in local currency, booked and
funded locally. Any exposure not meeting these criteria is defined as cross-border exposure. |
72
CONSUMER CREDIT PORTFOLIO
JPMorgan Chases consumer portfolio consists primarily of residential mortgages, home equity
loans, credit cards, auto loans, education loans and business banking loans, with a primary focus
on serving the prime consumer credit market. RFS offers home mortgage loans with interest-only
payment options to predominantly prime borrowers. The consumer credit portfolio also includes
certain loans acquired in the Washington Mutual transaction, primarily mortgage, home equity and
credit card loans.
A
substantial portion of the consumer loans acquired in the Washington
Mutual transaction were preliminarily
identified as credit impaired based on an analysis of high risk characteristics, including
delinquency status, geographic location, loan-to-value ratios and product type. These purchased
credit impaired loans are accounted for under SOP 03-3 and were initially recorded at fair value
under SOP 03-3. The estimated fair value of these loans includes an estimate of losses that are
expected to be incurred over the estimated remaining lives of the loans, and therefore no allowance
for loan losses was recorded for these loans as of the transaction date. The estimated contractual
unpaid principal balance outstanding and the estimated fair value of these loans were approximately
$108.4 billion and $77.9 billion, respectively, as of the
September 25, 2008, transaction date.
In addition, approximately $86.4 billion of
non-credit impaired consumer loans and a corresponding allowance for loan losses of $3.7
billion relating to this transaction were reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of
September 30, 2008. Due to the short time period between the
closing of the transaction (which occurred simultaneously with the
announcement on September 25, 2008) and the end of the third quarter,
certain amounts related to the purchased credit impaired loan
portfolio disclosed herein are preliminary estimates. The Firm
expects to finalize its analysis of these purchased credit impaired
loans during the fourth quarter of 2008; expanded disclosures will be
provided at that time and adjustments to estimated amounts may occur.
The credit performance of residential real estate loans continues to be negatively affected by
deterioration in housing values across many geographic markets. Geographic areas that have
experienced the most significant declines in home prices have exhibited higher delinquencies and
losses across the entire consumer credit product spectrum.
Management has taken significant actions to reduce risk exposure by tightening both underwriting
and loan qualification standards and account management criteria for real estate lending as well as
for consumer lending for non-real estate products in those markets most affected by the recent
housing downturn. Tighter income verification, more conservative collateral valuation, reduced
loan-to-value maximums and higher FICO and custom risk score requirements are just some of the
actions taken to date to mitigate risk. These actions have resulted in significant reductions in
new originations of risk layered loans (e.g., loans with high loan-to-value ratios to borrowers
with low FICO scores) and improved alignment of loan pricing. New originations of subprime mortgage
loans have been eliminated entirely. Finally, additional loss mitigation strategies have been
employed for all home lending portfolios. These strategies include rate reductions, principal
forgiveness, forbearance and other actions intended to minimize the economic loss and to avoid
foreclosure.
The Firm regularly evaluates market conditions and overall economic returns and makes an initial
determination of whether new originations will be held-for-investment or sold within the
foreseeable future. Due to the credit and market liquidity issues that arose in and have continued since July
2007, all loans other than prime conforming mortgage loans are originated into the held for investment
portfolio. Prime conforming mortgage loans originated with the intent to sell are accounted
for at fair value under SFAS 159 and classified as trading assets in the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. The Firm also periodically evaluates the expected economic returns of
previously originated loans under prevailing market conditions to determine whether their
designation as held-for-investment continues to be appropriate.
73
The following table presents managed consumer credit-related information for the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit exposure |
|
Nonperforming assets(d)(h)(i) |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans excluding purchased
credit impaired(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
$ |
116,804 |
|
|
$ |
94,832 |
|
|
$ |
1,142 |
|
|
$ |
786 |
|
Prime mortgage |
|
|
70,243 |
|
|
|
39,988 |
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
18,162 |
|
|
|
15,473 |
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
Option ARMs |
|
|
18,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto loans(b) |
|
|
43,306 |
|
|
|
42,350 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
Credit card reported(c) |
|
|
92,723 |
|
|
|
84,352 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
All other loans |
|
|
33,252 |
|
|
|
25,314 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
Loans held-for-sale |
|
|
1,604 |
|
|
|
3,989 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans excluding purchased
credit impaired(a) |
|
|
395,083 |
|
|
|
306,298 |
|
|
|
5,528 |
|
|
|
2,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans purchased credit
impaired(d) |
|
|
77,853 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans reported(c) |
|
|
472,936 |
|
|
|
306,298 |
|
|
|
5,528 |
|
|
|
2,768 |
|
Credit card securitized(c)(e) |
|
|
93,664 |
|
|
|
72,701 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans managed(c) |
|
|
566,600 |
|
|
|
378,999 |
|
|
|
5,528 |
|
|
|
2,768 |
|
Assets acquired in loan satisfaction |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
2,361 |
|
|
|
549 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer-related assets managed |
|
|
566,600 |
|
|
|
378,999 |
|
|
|
7,889 |
|
|
|
3,317 |
|
Consumer lending-related commitments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity(f) |
|
|
97,090 |
|
|
|
74,191 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
Prime mortgage |
|
|
6,562 |
|
|
|
7,394 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
149 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
Option ARMs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
Auto loans |
|
|
8,074 |
|
|
|
8,058 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
Credit card(f) |
|
|
784,916 |
|
|
|
714,848 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
All other loans |
|
|
14,117 |
|
|
|
11,429 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total lending-related commitments |
|
|
910,908 |
|
|
|
815,936 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer credit portfolio |
|
$ |
1,477,508 |
|
|
$ |
1,194,935 |
|
|
$ |
7,889 |
|
|
$ |
3,317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memo: Credit card managed |
|
$ |
186,387 |
|
|
$ |
157,053 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average annual net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average annual net |
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
charge-off rate(j) |
|
Net charge-offs |
|
charge-off rate(j) |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
$ |
663 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
|
2.78 |
% |
|
|
0.65 |
% |
|
$ |
1,621 |
|
|
$ |
316 |
|
|
|
2.28 |
% |
|
|
0.47 |
% |
Prime mortgage |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
1.51 |
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
0.98 |
|
|
|
0.07 |
|
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
7.65 |
|
|
|
1.62 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
5.43 |
|
|
|
1.28 |
|
Auto loans and leases(g) |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
1.12 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
1.10 |
|
|
|
0.72 |
|
Credit card reported |
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
5.56 |
|
|
|
3.89 |
|
|
|
3,159 |
|
|
|
2,247 |
|
|
|
5.40 |
|
|
|
3.74 |
|
All other loans |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
1.16 |
|
|
|
0.93 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
1.21 |
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans reported |
|
|
2,432 |
|
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
3.13 |
|
|
|
1.62 |
|
|
|
6,335 |
|
|
|
3,062 |
|
|
|
2.78 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
|
Credit card securitized(e) |
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
4.43 |
|
|
|
3.34 |
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
4.16 |
|
|
|
3.45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans managed |
|
$ |
3,305 |
|
|
$ |
1,717 |
|
|
|
3.39 |
% |
|
|
1.96 |
% |
|
$ |
8,719 |
|
|
$ |
4,823 |
|
|
|
3.06 |
% |
|
|
1.89 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memo: Credit card managed |
|
$ |
1,979 |
|
|
$ |
1,363 |
|
|
|
5.00 |
% |
|
|
3.64 |
% |
|
$ |
5,543 |
|
|
$ |
4,008 |
|
|
|
4.79 |
% |
|
|
3.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes RFS, CS and residential mortgage loans reported in the Corporate/Private Equity
segment as well as approximately $86.4 billion in non-credit impaired consumer loans acquired in
the Washington Mutual transaction. Adjustments to this estimated amount could occur during the
fourth quarter of 2008. |
(b) |
|
Excludes operating lease-related assets of $2.2 billion and $1.9 billion for September 30,
2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(c) |
|
Loans past due 90 days and over and accruing included: credit card receivables-reported of
$1.6 billion and $1.5 billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively, and
related credit card securitizations of $1.7 billion and $1.1 billion at September 30, 2008,
and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(d) |
|
Purchased credit impaired
loans represent loans acquired in the Washington Mutual transaction
that were considered credit impaired under SOP 03-3, and include
loans that were considered nonperforming
by Washington Mutual prior to the transaction closing. Under SOP 03-3, these loans are considered to be performing loans as
of the transaction date and are initially recorded at fair value and accrete interest income
over the estimated life of the loan when cash flows are reasonably estimable, even if the
underlying loans are contractually past due. The amount disclosed is a preliminary estimate.
Adjustments to this estimated amount could occur during the fourth
quarter of 2008. For additional information see Note 13 on pages
120122 of this Form 10-Q. |
74
|
|
|
(e) |
|
Represents securitized credit card receivables. For a further discussion of credit card
securitizations, see CS on pages 3336 of this Form 10-Q. |
(f) |
|
The credit card and home equity lending-related commitments represent the total available
lines of credit for these products. The Firm has not experienced, and does not anticipate,
that all available lines of credit will be utilized at the same time. For credit card
commitments and if certain conditions are met for home equity commitments, the Firm can reduce
or cancel these lines of credit by providing the borrower prior notice or, in some cases,
without notice as permitted by law. |
(g) |
|
Net charge-off rates exclude average operating lease-related assets of $2.2 billion and $1.8
billion for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $2.1 billion and
$1.7 billion for year-to-date 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
(h) |
|
Excluded nonperforming assets related to (1) loans eligible for repurchase as well as loans
repurchased from GNMA pools that are insured by U.S. government agencies of $1.8 billion and
$1.5 billion for September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively, and (2) education
loans that are 90 days past due and still accruing, which are insured by U.S. government
agencies under the Federal Family Education Loan Program of $405 million and $279 million as
of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. These amounts are excluded, as
reimbursement is proceeding normally . |
(i) |
|
During the second quarter of 2008, the policy for classifying subprime mortgage and home
equity loans as nonperforming was changed to conform to all the other home lending products.
Prior period nonperforming assets have been revised to conform to this change. |
(j) |
|
Net charge-off rates exclude average loans held-for-sale of $1.5 billion and $5.4 billion for
the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $3.2 billion and $12.9
billion year-to-date 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
The following discussion relates to the specific loan and lending-related categories within
the consumer portfolio.
Home equity: Home equity loans at September 30, 2008, were $116.8 billion, including $22.2 billion
acquired in the Washington Mutual transaction. The year-to-date provision for credit losses for the
home equity portfolio includes a net increase of $1.2 billion to the allowance for loan losses
excluding the Washington Mutual accounting conformity adjustment. The home equity portfolio
continues to be under stress, as risk-layered loans, weak housing prices and slowing economic
growth have resulted in higher nonperforming assets and greater estimated losses for this product
segment. Losses are particularly concentrated in loans with high combined effective loan-to-value
ratios in specific geographic regions that have experienced significant declines in housing prices.
The decline in housing prices and the second lien position for most of these loans results in
minimal proceeds upon foreclosure, increasing the severity of losses. In response to continued
weakness in housing markets, loan underwriting and account management criteria have been tightened,
with a particular focus on metropolitan statistical areas (MSAs) with the most significant
housing price declines. New originations of home equity loans have decreased significantly, as
additional loss mitigation strategies have been employed including the elimination of stated income
loans and the significant reduction of maximum combined loan-to-value ratios (CLTVs) for new
originations, which now range from 50% to 80%, based upon the state/MSA of the secured property.
Other loss mitigation strategies include the reduction of outstanding credit lines in MSAs with
significant price declines.
Mortgage: Mortgage loans, which include prime mortgages, subprime mortgages, option ARMs and loans
held-for-sale, totaled $107.5 billion at September 30, 2008, including $47.2 billion acquired in
the Washington Mutual transaction.
Prime mortgages of $70.3 billion include $23.5 billion of loans acquired in the Washington Mutual
transaction. The year-to-date provision for credit losses includes a net increase of $806 million
to the allowance for loan losses for this portfolio excluding the Washington Mutual accounting
conformity adjustment, due to an increase in estimated losses, most notably for loans originated in
2006 and 2007 in geographic locations that have experienced the most significant housing price
declines. Management has tightened underwriting standards for nonconforming prime mortgages in
recent quarters, including eliminating stated income products, reducing CLTV requirements, and
eliminating the broker origination channel.
Subprime mortgages of $18.2 billion include $4.7 billion of loans acquired in the Washington Mutual
transaction. The year-to-date provision for credit losses includes a net increase of $1.1 billion
to the allowance for loan losses for this portfolio, excluding the Washington Mutual accounting
conformity adjustment. New originations of subprime mortgages were discontinued during the current
year.
Option ARMs of $19.0 billion were acquired in the Washington Mutual transaction. New originations
of option ARMs were discontinued by Washington Mutual during the current year.
Option ARMs are adjustable-rate mortgage products that provide the borrower with the option each
month to make a fully-amortizing, interest-only, or minimum payment.
The minimum payment is typically insufficient to cover interest
accrued in the prior month and any unpaid interest is deferred and
added to the principal balance of the loan. The minimum payment on an
option ARM loan is based upon the interest rate charged during the introductory period. This
introductory rate was typically well below the fully-indexed rate. The fully-indexed rate is
calculated using an index rate plus a margin. Once the introductory period ends, the contractual
interest rate charged on the loan increases to the fully-indexed rate and adjusts monthly to
reflect movements in the index.
75
If the borrower continues to make the minimum monthly payment after the introductory period ends,
the payment may not be sufficient to cover interest accrued in the previous month. In this case,
the loan will negatively amortize as unpaid interest is deferred and added to the principal
balance of the loan. The minimum payment on an option ARM loan is adjusted on each anniversary date
of the loan but each increase or decrease is limited to a maximum of 7.5% of the minimum payment
amount on such date until a recasting event occurs.
A
recasting event occurs every 60 months or sooner upon reaching a
negative amortization cap, which is expressed as a percent of the
original loan balance. When
a recasting event occurs, a new minimum monthly payment is calculated without regard to any limits
that would otherwise apply under the annual 7.5% payment cap.
This new minimum monthly payment is calculated to be sufficient to fully repay the principal
balance of the loan, including any deferred interest, over the remainder of the loan
term using the fully-indexed rate then in effect. Decreases in mortgage rates to which option ARM loans
are indexed will generally delay the timeframe within which these loans
reach their negative amortization caps. Conversely, increases in these rates will generally accelerate the timeframe within which option
ARM loans reach their negative amortization caps.
In the first month that follows a recasting event, the minimum payment will equal the
fully-amortizing payment. If in subsequent months the index rate decreases, the minimum payment may
exceed the fully-amortizing payment. Conversely, if the index rate increases in subsequent months,
negative amortization may resume. In this situation, the 7.5% annual payment cap will once again
limit the change in the minimum payment until another recasting event occurs.
Auto loans: As of September 30, 2008, auto loans of $43.3 billion increased $1.0 billion from
year-end 2007. The auto loan portfolio reflects a high concentration of prime and near-prime
quality credits. The provision for credit losses for the auto loan portfolio increased
during the quarter and year-to-date periods, reflecting an increase in estimated losses due to an
increase in loss severity and further deterioration of older vintage loans as a result of the
worsening credit environment. In response to recent increases in loan delinquencies and credit
losses, particularly in geographic areas experiencing significant housing price declines, credit
underwriting criteria have been tightened, which has resulted in the reduction of both
extended-term and high loan-to-value financing.
Credit card: JPMorgan Chase analyzes its credit card portfolio on a managed basis, which includes
credit card receivables on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and those receivables sold to investors
through securitization. Managed credit card receivables were $186.4 billion at September 30, 2008,
including $27.1 billion acquired in the Washington Mutual transaction.
Excluding the impact of the Washington Mutual transaction, loans increased $2.3 billion from
year-end 2007 as a result of organic growth. The managed credit card net charge-off rate increased
to 5.00% for the third quarter of 2008 from 3.64% in the third quarter of 2007. The year-to-date
managed credit card net charge-off rate increased to 4.79% in 2008 from 3.61% in 2007. The 30-day
managed delinquency rate increased to 3.69% at September 30, 2008, from 3.25% at September 30,
2007. The increases in net charge-off and delinquency rates reflect deterioration in underlying
credit quality, primarily due to the weakness in the current economic environment including continued
weakness in housing markets. As a result of continued weakness in housing markets, account
acquisition credit criteria and account management credit practices in the more severely impacted
MSAs have been tightened. The managed credit card portfolio continues to reflect a well-seasoned,
largely rewards-based portfolio that has good U.S. geographic diversification.
All other loans: All other loans primarily include business banking loans (which are highly
collateralized loans, often with personal loan guarantees), and education loans. As of September
30, 2008, other loans, including loans held-for-sale, were
$34.7 billion including $1.9 billion
acquired in the Washington Mutual transaction.
76
The following tables present the geographic distribution of consumer credit outstandings by product
as of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, excluding loans purchased from Washington Mutual.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
Sept. 30, 2008 |
|
Home |
|
Prime |
|
Subprime |
|
|
|
|
|
Card - |
|
other |
|
consumer |
|
Card |
|
consumer |
(in billions) |
|
equity |
|
mortgage |
|
mortgage |
|
Auto |
|
reported |
|
loans |
|
loans - reported |
|
securitized |
|
loans - managed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top 12 states |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
$ |
14.9 |
|
|
$ |
13.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.8 |
|
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
9.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
$ |
46.0 |
|
|
$ |
11.5 |
|
|
$ |
57.5 |
|
New York |
|
|
15.2 |
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
38.4 |
|
|
|
6.3 |
|
|
|
44.7 |
|
Texas |
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
27.1 |
|
Florida |
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
Illinois |
|
|
6.8 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
23.0 |
|
Ohio |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
18.6 |
|
New Jersey |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
16.0 |
|
Michigan |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
|
2.8 |
|
|
|
14.8 |
|
Arizona |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
Pennsylvania |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
Colorado |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
Indiana |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
8.7 |
|
All other |
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
15.3 |
|
|
|
30.3 |
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
91.3 |
|
|
|
30.9 |
|
|
|
122.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
94.6 |
|
|
$ |
46.9 |
|
|
$ |
13.4 |
|
|
$ |
43.3 |
|
|
$ |
77.6 |
|
|
$ |
32.8 |
|
|
$ |
308.6 |
|
|
$ |
81.7 |
|
|
$ |
390.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
Dec. 31, 2007 |
|
Home |
|
Prime |
|
Subprime |
|
|
|
|
|
Card - |
|
other |
|
consumer |
|
Card |
|
consumer |
(in billions) |
|
equity |
|
mortgage |
|
mortgage |
|
Auto |
|
reported |
|
loans |
|
loans - reported |
|
securitized |
|
loans - managed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top 12 states |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California |
|
$ |
14.9 |
|
|
$ |
11.4 |
|
|
$ |
2.0 |
|
|
$ |
5.0 |
|
|
$ |
11.0 |
|
|
$ |
1.0 |
|
|
$ |
45.3 |
|
|
$ |
9.6 |
|
|
$ |
54.9 |
|
New York |
|
|
14.4 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
36.8 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
42.4 |
|
Texas |
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
21.1 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
|
Florida |
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
18.5 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
22.7 |
|
Illinois |
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
3.9 |
|
|
|
22.2 |
|
Ohio |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
17.8 |
|
New Jersey |
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
12.1 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
15.2 |
|
Michigan |
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
11.8 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
14.3 |
|
Arizona |
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
12.5 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
13.9 |
|
Pennsylvania |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
2.9 |
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
Colorado |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
Indiana |
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
8.6 |
|
All other |
|
|
22.4 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
|
|
33.6 |
|
|
|
8.0 |
|
|
|
92.8 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
120.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
94.8 |
|
|
$ |
40.6 |
|
|
$ |
15.4 |
|
|
$ |
42.4 |
|
|
$ |
84.4 |
|
|
$ |
28.7 |
|
|
$ |
306.3 |
|
|
$ |
72.7 |
|
|
$ |
379.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
77
ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
For a further discussion of the components of the allowance for credit losses, see Critical
Accounting Estimates Used by the Firm on pages 8587 and Note 14 on page 123 of this Form 10-Q,
and page 96 and Note 15 on pages 138139 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report. At September 30,
2008, management deemed the allowance for credit losses to be appropriate (i.e., sufficient to
absorb losses that are inherent in the portfolio, including losses that are not specifically
identified or for which the size of the loss has not yet been fully determined).
Summary of changes in the allowance for credit losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
(in millions) |
|
Wholesale |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Wholesale |
|
|
Consumer |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance at January 1, |
|
$ |
3,154 |
|
|
$ |
6,080 |
|
|
$ |
9,234 |
|
|
$ |
2,711 |
|
|
$ |
4,568 |
|
|
$ |
7,279 |
|
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting
principles(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance at January 1, adjusted |
|
|
3,154 |
|
|
|
6,080 |
|
|
|
9,234 |
|
|
|
2,655 |
|
|
|
4,568 |
|
|
|
7,223 |
|
Gross charge-offs |
|
|
(283 |
) |
|
|
(6,932 |
) |
|
|
(7,215 |
) |
|
|
(131 |
) |
|
|
(3,600 |
) |
|
|
(3,731 |
) |
Gross recoveries |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
597 |
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
538 |
|
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (charge-offs) recoveries |
|
|
(185 |
) |
|
|
(6,335 |
) |
|
|
(6,520 |
) |
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
(3,062 |
) |
|
|
(3,109 |
) |
Provision for loan losses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision
excluding accounting policy conformity |
|
|
1,788 |
|
|
|
10,039 |
|
|
|
11,827 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
3,706 |
|
|
|
3,988 |
|
Accounting policy conformity(b) |
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for loan losses |
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
11,451 |
|
|
|
13,803 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
3,706 |
|
|
|
3,988 |
|
Addition resulting from Washington Mutual
transaction |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
2,306 |
|
|
|
2,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
29 |
(c) |
|
|
(29 |
)(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(27 |
)(f) |
|
|
38 |
(f) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance at September 30 |
|
$ |
5,579 |
(d) |
|
$ |
13,473 |
(e) |
|
|
19,052 |
|
|
$ |
2,863 |
(d) |
|
$ |
5,250 |
(e) |
|
$ |
8,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-specific |
|
$ |
253 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
323 |
|
|
$ |
53 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
Formula-based |
|
|
5,326 |
|
|
|
13,403 |
|
|
|
18,729 |
|
|
|
2,810 |
|
|
|
5,180 |
|
|
|
7,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
5,579 |
|
|
$ |
13,473 |
|
|
$ |
19,052 |
|
|
$ |
2,863 |
|
|
$ |
5,250 |
|
|
$ |
8,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lending-related commitments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance at January 1, |
|
$ |
835 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
850 |
|
|
$ |
499 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
524 |
|
Provision for lending-related commitments |
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
334 |
|
Other |
|
|
7 |
(c) |
|
|
(7 |
)(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance at September 30 |
|
$ |
704 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
713 |
|
|
$ |
843 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-specific |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
Formula-based |
|
|
670 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
816 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
allowance for lending-related commitments |
|
$ |
704 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
713 |
|
|
$ |
843 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
|
$ |
858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for credit losses |
|
$ |
6,283 |
|
|
$ |
13,482 |
|
|
$ |
19,765 |
|
|
$ |
3,706 |
|
|
$ |
5,265 |
|
|
$ |
8,971 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reflects the effect of the adoption of SFAS 159 at January 1, 2007. For a further
discussion of SFAS 159, see Note 4 on pages 109111 of this Form 10-Q. |
(b) |
|
Related to the Washington Mutual transaction in the third quarter of 2008. |
(c) |
|
Primarily related to the transfer of loans from RFS to CB during the first quarter of 2008. |
(d) |
|
The ratio of the wholesale allowance for loan losses to total wholesale loans was 2.06% and
1.62%, excluding wholesale held-for-sale loans, loans accounted for at fair value and
purchased credit impaired loans acquired in the Washington Mutual transaction at September
30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
(e) |
|
The ratio of the consumer allowance for loan losses to total consumer loans was 3.42% and
1.84%, excluding consumer held-for-sale loans, loans accounted for at fair value and
purchased credit impaired loans acquired in the Washington Mutual transaction at September
30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
(f) |
|
Partially related to the transfer of allowance between wholesale and consumer in conjunction
with prime mortgages transferred to the Corporate/Private Equity sector. |
78
The allowance for credit losses increased $9.7 billion from December 31, 2007, to $19.8
billion, including $4.5 billion of allowance related to the Washington Mutual transaction.
Excluding the Washington Mutual transaction, the allowance for credit losses increased $5.2
billion, reflecting increases of $3.7 billion and $1.5 billion in the consumer and wholesale
portfolios, respectively. Excluding held-for-sale loans, loans carried at fair value, and purchased
credit impaired loans, the allowance for loan losses represented 2.86% of loans at September 30,
2008, compared with 1.88% at December 31, 2007. The consumer allowance for loan losses increased
$7.4 billion from December 31, 2007, as a result of the Washington Mutual transaction and increased
allowance for loan loss in residential real estate. The increase included $1.2 billion for home
equity loans, as risk-layered loans, continued weak housing prices and slowing economic growth
continue to result in increased estimated losses for this product segment and higher nonperforming
assets. The allowance for loan loss increased $1.1 billion for subprime mortgages and $806 million
for prime mortgages, as housing price declines in specific geographic regions and slowing economic
growth continue to increase estimated losses for all mortgage product segments and to have a
negative impact on nonperforming assets. The increase in wholesale allowance for loan losses
reflected the effect of a weakening credit environment, the transfer of funded and unfunded
leverage lending commitments to retained loans from held-for-sale and, to a lesser extent, loan
growth.
The allowance for lending-related commitments, which is reported in other liabilities, was $713
million and $850 million at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. The decrease
reflects the reduction in commitments at September 30, 2008.
Provision for credit losses
For a discussion of the reported provision for credit losses, see page 15 of this Form 10-Q. The
managed provision for credit losses was $6.7 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2008,
including the $2.0 billion charge to conform Washington Mutuals loan loss allowance, which
affected both consumer and wholesale portfolios. Excluding the policy conformity charge, the provision was up
$2.3 billion, or 98%, from the prior year. The total consumer managed provision for credit losses
was $4.3 billion in the current quarter compared with $2.0 billion in the prior year. The increase in the consumer provision beyond the accounting
conformity adjustment reflected increases in estimated losses for the home equity, subprime
mortgage, prime mortgage and credit card loan portfolios. The wholesale
provision for credit losses excluding the charge to conform Washington Mutuals loan loss allowance
was $398 million for the third quarter of 2008 compared with a provision of $351 million in the
prior year, predominantly reflecting the effect of a weakening credit environment as well as loan
growth. The year-to-date increase from the prior period in the wholesale provision for credit
losses also was affected by the transfer of funded and unfunded leverage lending commitments to
retained loans from held-for-sale.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lending-related |
|
Total provision |
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
commitments |
|
for credit losses |
Three months ended September 30, (in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Bank |
|
$ |
238 |
|
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
81 |
|
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
227 |
|
Commercial Banking |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Treasury & Securities Services |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Asset Management |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Corporate/Private Equity |
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total wholesale |
|
|
935 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
962 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
Retail Financial Services |
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
688 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
Card Services reported |
|
|
1,356 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,356 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
Corporate/Private Equity |
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,791 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
4,825 |
|
|
|
1,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
4,825 |
|
|
|
1,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for credit losses reported |
|
|
5,760 |
|
|
|
1,693 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
5,787 |
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
Card Services securitized |
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for credit losses managed |
|
$ |
6,633 |
|
|
$ |
2,271 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
6,660 |
|
|
$ |
2,363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lending-related |
|
Total provision |
|
|
Provision for loan losses |
|
commitments |
|
for credit losses |
Nine months ended September 30, (in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Bank |
|
$ |
1,347 |
|
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
$ |
(97 |
) |
|
$ |
286 |
|
|
$ |
1,250 |
|
|
$ |
454 |
|
Commercial Banking |
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
125 |
|
|
|
(51 |
) |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
Treasury & Securities Services |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Asset Management |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
Corporate/Private Equity |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total wholesale |
|
|
2,352 |
|
|
|
282 |
|
|
|
(138 |
) |
|
|
344 |
|
|
|
2,214 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
Retail Financial Services |
|
|
5,501 |
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
5,502 |
|
|
|
1,559 |
|
Card Services reported |
|
|
3,709 |
|
|
|
2,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,709 |
|
|
|
2,162 |
|
Corporate/Private Equity |
|
|
2,241 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,241 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer |
|
|
11,451 |
|
|
|
3,706 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
11,452 |
|
|
|
3,696 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for credit losses reported |
|
|
13,803 |
|
|
|
3,988 |
|
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
13,666 |
|
|
|
4,322 |
|
Card Services securitized |
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for credit losses managed |
|
$ |
16,187 |
|
|
$ |
5,749 |
|
|
$ |
(137 |
) |
|
$ |
334 |
|
|
$ |
16,050 |
|
|
$ |
6,083 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MARKET RISK MANAGEMENT
For discussion of the Firms market risk management organization, see pages 9094 of JPMorgan
Chases 2007 Annual Report.
Value-at-risk (VaR)
JPMorgan Chases primary statistical risk measure, VaR, estimates the potential loss from adverse
market moves in an ordinary market environment and provides a consistent cross-business measure of
risk profiles and levels of diversification. VaR is used for comparing risks across businesses,
monitoring limits, one-off approvals, and as an input to economic capital calculations. VaR
provides risk transparency in a normal trading environment. Each business day the Firm undertakes a
comprehensive VaR calculation that includes both its trading and its nontrading risks. VaR for
nontrading risk measures the amount of potential change in the fair values of the exposures related
to these risks; however, for such risks, VaR is not a measure of reported revenue since nontrading
activities are generally not marked-to-market through net income. Hedges of nontrading activities
may be included in VaR since they are marked-to-market. Credit portfolio VaR includes VaR on
derivative credit valuation adjustments, hedges of the credit valuation adjustment and
mark-to-market hedges of the retained loan portfolio, which are all reported in principal
transactions revenue. For a discussion of credit valuation adjustments, see Note 4 on pages
111118 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report. Credit portfolio VaR does not include the retained
loan portfolio, which is not marked-to-market.
To calculate VaR, the Firm uses historical simulation, which measures risk across instruments and
portfolios in a consistent and comparable way. This approach assumes that historical changes in
market values are representative of future changes; this is an assumption that may not always be
accurate particularly given the volatility in the current market environment. The simulation is
based upon data for the previous 12 months. For certain products, an actual price timeseries is not
available. In such cases, the historical simulation is done using a proxy timeseries to estimate
the risk. It is likely that using an actual price timeseries for these products, if available,
would impact the VaR results presented. The Firm calculates VaR using a one-day time horizon and an
expected tail-loss methodology, which approximates a 99% confidence level. This means the Firm
would expect to incur losses greater than that predicted by VaR estimates once in every 100 trading
days, or about two to three times a year. For a further discussion of the Firms VaR methodology,
see Market Risk Management Value-at-risk, on pages 9192 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual
Report.
80
IB trading VaR by risk type and credit portfolio VaR
(99% Confidence Level)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30,(c) |
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
At September 30, |
|
Average |
(in millions) |
|
Avg. |
|
|
Min |
|
|
Max |
|
|
Avg. |
|
|
Min |
|
|
Max |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By risk type: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income |
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
255 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
$ |
135 |
|
|
$ |
228 |
|
|
$ |
104 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Equities |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Commodities and other |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Diversification |
|
|
(104 |
)(a) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
|
(72 |
)(a) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
|
(109 |
)(a) |
|
|
(111 |
)(a) |
|
|
(95 |
)(a) |
|
|
(68 |
)(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading VaR |
|
$ |
220 |
|
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
$ |
325 |
|
|
$ |
112 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
265 |
|
|
$ |
91 |
|
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
$ |
102 |
|
Credit portfolio VaR |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
Diversification |
|
|
(49 |
)(a) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
|
(22 |
)(a) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
NM |
(b) |
|
|
(117 |
)(a) |
|
|
(16 |
)(a) |
|
|
(39 |
)(a) |
|
|
(16 |
)(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading and credit
portfolio VaR |
|
$ |
218 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
$ |
309 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
253 |
|
|
$ |
98 |
|
|
$ |
161 |
|
|
$ |
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Average and period-end VaRs are less than the sum of the VaRs of its market risk
components, which is due to risk offsets resulting from portfolio diversification. The
diversification effect reflects the fact that the risks are not perfectly correlated. The risk
of a portfolio of positions is therefore usually less than the sum of the risks of the
positions themselves. |
(b) |
|
Designated as not meaningful (NM) because the minimum and maximum may occur on different
days for different risk components, and hence it is not meaningful to compute a portfolio
diversification effect. |
(c) |
|
The results for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 include five months of heritage
JPMorgan Chase only results and four months of combined JPMorgan Chase and Bear Stearns; 2007
reflects heritage JPMorgan Chase results only. |
For certain products included in the trading VaR above, particular risk parameters are not
fully captured for example, correlation risk, or the credit spread sensitivity of certain mortgage
products. VaR does not include held-for-sale funded loan and unfunded commitments positions;
however, it does include hedges of those positions. Trading VaR also does not include the debit
valuation adjustments (DVA) taken on derivative and structured liabilities to reflect the credit
quality of the Firm nor does it include the MSR portfolio or VaR related to securities and
instruments held by other corporate functions, such as Corporate/Private Equity. See the DVA
Sensitivity table on page 83 of this Form 10-Q for further details. For a discussion of MSRs and
the corporate functions, see Note 3 on pages 98109, Note 18 on pages 135137 and
Corporate/Private Equity on pages 4749 of this Form 10-Q, and Note 18 on pages 154156, Note 4
on page 113 and Corporate/Private Equity on pages 5960 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
Third Quarter 2008 VaR Results
The IBs average total trading and credit portfolio VaR for the third quarter and first nine months
of 2008 was $218 million and $161 million, respectively, compared with $107 million in the third
quarter and $100 million in the first nine months of 2007 and includes the positions from the Bear
Stearns merger since May 31, 2008. The increase in average and maximum VaR during the third quarter
over the prior year was primarily due to increased volatility across virtually all asset classes.
In addition, increased hedges of positions not specifically captured
in VaR for example, macro
hedge strategies that have been deployed to mitigate the consequences of a systemic risk event and
hedges of loans held-for-sale significantly increased the VaR
compared with the prior period. The
Bear Stearns merger in the second quarter of 2008 also contributed to the increase in VaR. VaR
relating to Bear Stearns positions not yet migrated to JPMorgan Chase VaR models has been estimated
in order to produce a single VaR for the combined Firm. As the Bear Stearns positions migrate to
JPMorgan Chases VaR models, the impact on VaR may change.
For the third quarter of 2008, compared with the prior year period, average trading VaR
6diversification increased to $104 million, or 32% of the sum of the components, from $72 million,
or 39% of the sum of the components, reflecting the impact of the
Bear Stearns merger. In general, over the
course of the year, VaR exposures can vary significantly as positions change, market volatility
fluctuates and diversification benefits change.
81
VaR backtesting
To evaluate the soundness of its VaR model, the Firm conducts daily back-testing of VaR against
daily IB market risk-related revenue, which is defined as the change in value of principal
transactions revenue (less Private Equity gains/losses) plus any trading-related net interest
income, brokerage commissions, underwriting fees or other revenue. The daily IB market risk-related
revenue excludes gains and losses on held-for-sale funded loans and unfunded commitments and from
DVA. The following histogram illustrates the daily market risk-related gains and losses for IB
trading businesses for the first nine months of 2008. The chart shows that IB posted market
risk-related gains on 136 out of 196 days in this period, with 51 days exceeding $100 million. The
inset graph looks at those days on which IB experienced losses and depicts the amount by which 99%
confidence level VaR exceeded the actual loss on each of those days. Losses were sustained on 60
days during the nine months ended September 30, 2008. For the first nine months of 2008, losses
exceeded the VaR measure on three days, due to the high market volatility experienced during that
period. Losses had exceeded the VaR measure on five days for the first nine months of 2007, also
due to high market volatility.
Revised VaR Measurement
In the third quarter of 2008, the Firm revised the VaR measurement described above to create a more
comprehensive view of its market risks by adding syndicated lending facilities that the Firm
intends to distribute, and the credit spread sensitivities of certain mortgage products. The Firm
utilizes proxies to estimate the VaR for these products since daily timeseries are largely
not available. In addition, certain actively managed positions utilized as part of the Firms risk
management function within Corporate and in the Retail Mortgage Banking businesses have been added
to the IB VaR to provide a Total IB and other VaR measure. In the Firms view,
including these items in VaR produces a more complete perspective of the Firms risk profile for
those items with market risk that can impact the income statement. The Mortgage Banking VaR
includes the Firms mortgage pipeline and warehouse, MSR and all related hedges. Finally, the Firm
moved from using a 99% confidence level to a 95% confidence level since the 95% level provides a
more stable measure of the VaR for day-to-day risk management. Changing to the 95% confidence
interval caused the average VaR to drop by $85 million. Under the 95% confidence interval, the Firm
would expect to incur daily losses greater than that predicted by VaR estimates about twelve times a
year.
82
The table below shows the results of the Firms VaR measure under the revised measurement using 95%
confidence level. The Firm intends to fully replace the VaR measurement described on page 80 of
this Form 10-Q with its revised Total IB and other VaR measurement once a full year of comparable
results are available.
Total IB trading VaR by risk type, credit portfolio VaR and other VaR
(95% Confidence Level)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
(in millions) |
|
Average |
|
At September 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IB VaR by risk type: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed income |
|
$ |
130 |
|
|
$ |
139 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Equities |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Commodities and other |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Diversification benefit to IB trading VaR |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(77 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IB Trading VaR |
|
$ |
144 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
Credit portfolio VaR |
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
Diversification benefit to IB trading and credit portfolio VaR |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(35) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total IB trading and credit
portfolio VaR |
|
$ |
147 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Banking VaR |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Corporate Risk Management VaR |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Diversification benefit to total other VaR |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other VaR |
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversification benefit to total IB and other VaR |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total IB and other VaR |
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
$ |
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The revised VaR measurement continues to exclude the DVA taken
on derivative and structured liabilities to reflect the credit quality of the Firm. It also
excludes certain nontrading activity such as Private Equity, principal investing (e.g., mezzanine
financing, tax-oriented investments, etc.) and Corporate Treasury balance sheet and capital
management positions as well as longer-term corporate investments. Corporate Treasury positions are
managed through the Firms earnings-at-risk and other cash flow monitoring processes rather than by using
a VaR measure. Nontrading principal investing activities and Private Equity positions are managed
using stress and scenario analysis.
The following table provides information about the sensitivity of DVA to a one basis point increase
in JPMorgan Chases credit spreads. The sensitivity of DVA for September 30, 2008, represents the
combined Firm (including Bear Stearns), while the sensitivity of DVA for December 31, 2007,
represents heritage JPMorgan Chase only.
Debit Valuation Adjustment Sensitivity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 Basis Point Increase in |
(in millions) |
|
JPMorgan Chase Credit Spread |
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
38 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Economic value stress testing
While VaR reflects the risk of loss due to adverse changes in normal markets, stress testing
captures the Firms exposure to unlikely but plausible events in abnormal markets. The Firm
conducts economic-value stress tests for both its trading and nontrading activities at least once a
month using multiple scenarios that assume credit spreads widen significantly, equity prices
decline and interest rates rise in the major currencies. Additional scenarios focus on the risks
predominant in individual business segments and include scenarios that focus on the potential for
adverse moves in complex portfolios. Periodically, scenarios are reviewed and updated to reflect
changes in the Firms risk profile and economic events. Along with VaR, stress testing is important
in measuring and controlling risk. Stress testing enhances the understanding of the Firms risk
profile and loss potential, and stress losses are monitored against limits. Stress testing is also
utilized in one-off approvals and cross-business risk measurement, as well as an input to economic
capital allocation. Stress-test results, trends and explanations are provided each month to the
Firms senior management and to the lines of business to help them better measure and manage risks
and to understand event risk-sensitive positions.
83
Earnings-at-risk stress testing
The VaR and stress-test measures described above illustrate the total economic sensitivity of the
Firms balance sheet to changes in market variables. The effect of interest rate exposure on
reported net income also is important. Interest rate risk exposure in the Firms core nontrading
business activities (i.e., asset/liability management positions) results from on- and off-balance
sheet positions. The Firm conducts simulations of changes in net interest income from its
nontrading activities under a variety of interest rate scenarios. Earnings-at-risk tests measure
the potential change in the Firms net interest income over the next 12 months and highlight
exposures to various rate-sensitive factors, such as the rates themselves (e.g., the prime lending
rate), pricing strategies on deposits, optionality and changes in product mix. The tests include
forecasted balance sheet changes, such as asset sales and securitizations, as well as prepayment
and reinvestment behavior.
Earnings-at-risk also can result from changes in the slope of the yield curve because the Firm has
the ability to lend at fixed rates and borrow at variable or short-term fixed rates. Based upon
these scenarios, the Firms earnings would be affected negatively by a sudden and unanticipated
increase in short-term rates without a corresponding increase in long-term rates. Conversely,
higher long-term rates generally are beneficial to earnings, particularly when the increase is not
accompanied by rising short-term rates.
Immediate changes in interest rates present a limited view of risk, and so a number of alternative
scenarios also are reviewed. These scenarios include the implied forward curve, nonparallel rate
shifts and severe interest rate shocks on selected key rates. These scenarios are intended to
provide a comprehensive view of JPMorgan Chases earnings-at-risk over a wide range of outcomes.
JPMorgan Chases 12-month pretax earnings sensitivity profiles as of September 30, 2008, and
December 31, 2007, were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Immediate change in rates |
(in millions) |
|
+200bp |
|
+100bp |
|
-100bp |
|
-200bp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
(331 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(400 |
) |
|
$ |
NM |
(a) |
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
(308 |
) |
|
|
(664 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
A down 200 basis point parallel shock results in a Fed Funds target rate of zero and
negative three- and six-month Treasury rates. The earnings-at-risk results of such a low
probability scenario are not meaningful. |
The change in earnings-at-risk from December 31, 2007, results from a higher level of AFS
securities and lower market interest rates. The Firm is exposed to both rising and falling rates.
The Firms risk to rising rates is largely the result of increased funding costs. In contrast, the
exposure to falling rates is the result of higher anticipated levels of loan and securities
prepayments, as well as spread compression on deposit products.
PRIVATE EQUITY RISK MANAGEMENT
For a discussion of Private Equity Risk Management, see page 94 of JPMorgan Chases 2007
Annual Report. At September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, the carrying value of the Private
Equity portfolio was $7.5 billion and $7.2 billion, respectively, of which $600 million and $390
million, respectively, represented positions traded in the public markets.
OPERATIONAL RISK MANAGEMENT
For a discussion of JPMorgan Chases Operational Risk Management, refer to pages 9495 of JPMorgan
Chases 2007 Annual Report.
REPUTATION AND FIDUCIARY RISK MANAGEMENT
For a discussion of the Firms Reputation and Fiduciary Risk Management, see page 95 of JPMorgan
Chases 2007 Annual Report.
SUPERVISION AND REGULATION
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the Supervision and Regulation section
on pages 13 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Form 10-K.
84
Dividends
At September 30, 2008, JPMorgan Chases bank subsidiaries could pay, in the aggregate, $22.7
billion in dividends to their respective bank holding companies without prior approval of their
relevant banking regulators.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES USED BY THE FIRM
JPMorgan Chases accounting policies and use of estimates are integral to understanding its
reported results. The Firms most complex accounting estimates require managements judgment to
ascertain the valuation of assets and liabilities. The Firm has established detailed policies and
control procedures intended to ensure that valuation methods, including any judgments made as part
of such methods, are well-controlled, independently reviewed and applied consistently from period
to period. In addition, the policies and procedures are intended to ensure that the process for
changing methodologies is managed in an appropriate manner. The Firm believes its estimates for
determining the valuation of its assets and liabilities are appropriate. The following is a brief
description of the Firms critical accounting estimates involving significant valuation judgments.
Allowance for credit losses
JPMorgan Chases allowance for credit losses covers the retained wholesale and consumer loan
portfolios as well as the Firms portfolio of wholesale and consumer lending-related commitments.
The allowance for loan losses is intended to adjust the value of the Firms loan assets to reflect
probable credit losses as of the balance sheet date. For a further discussion of the methodologies
used in establishing the Firms allowance for credit losses, see Note 15 on pages 138139 of
JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report. The methodology for calculating the allowance for loan losses
and the allowance for lending-related commitments involves significant judgment. For a further
description of these judgments, see Allowance for Credit Losses on pages 9697 of JPMorgan Chases
2007 Annual Report; for amounts recorded as of September 30, 2008 and 2007, see Allowance for
Credit Losses on page 78 and Note 14 on page 123 of this
Form 10-Q. As noted on page 96 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report, the Firms wholesale allowance is
sensitive to the risk rating assigned to a loan. Assuming a one-notch downgrade in the Firms
internal risk ratings for its entire wholesale portfolio, the allowance for loan losses for the
wholesale portfolio would increase by approximately $1.5 billion as of September 30, 2008. This
sensitivity analysis is hypothetical. In the Firms view, the likelihood of a one-notch downgrade
for all wholesale loans within a short timeframe is remote. The purpose of this analysis is to
provide an indication of the impact of risk ratings on the estimate of the allowance for loan
losses for wholesale loans. It is not intended to imply managements expectation of future
deterioration in risk ratings. Given the process the Firm follows in determining the risk ratings
of its loans, management believes the risk ratings currently assigned to wholesale loans are
appropriate.
For consumer loans, the allowance for loan losses is sensitive to changes in the economic
environment, delinquency status, credit bureau scores, the realizable value of collateral, borrower
behavior and other risk factors. During 2007 and continuing into 2008, an unprecedented decline in
housing prices resulted in actual losses that were significantly higher than managements prior
estimates. Continued significant differences in managements expectations for these and other
factors could have a continued significant impact on the estimation of the allowance for loan
losses.
Fair value of financial instruments, MSRs and commodities inventory
A portion of JPMorgan Chases assets and liabilities are carried at fair value, including trading
assets and liabilities, AFS securities, certain loans, MSRs, private equity investments, structured
notes, and certain securities financing activities. Physical
commodities are carried at the lower of cost or fair value and reported within the recurring fair
value disclosures. Held-for-sale loans are carried at the lower of cost or fair value on a
nonrecurring basis. At September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, $803.7 billion and $635.5
billion, respectively, of the Firms assets, and $309.9 billion and $254.3 billion, respectively,
of the Firms liabilities were recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.
The Firm has an established and well-documented process for determining fair values. Fair value is
based upon quoted market prices, where available. If listed prices or quotes are not available,
fair value is based upon internally developed models that primarily use as inputs market-based or
independently sourced market parameters. The Firms process is
intended to ensure that all applicable inputs are
appropriately calibrated to market data, including but not limited to yield curves, interest rates,
volatilities, equity or debt prices, foreign exchange rates and credit curves. In addition to
market information, models also incorporate transaction details, such
as maturity. Valuation adjustments may be made to ensure that
financial instruments are recorded at fair value. These adjustments
include amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality, the
Firms creditworthiness, constraints on liquidity and
unobservable parameters that are applied consistently over time.
85
During the first nine months of 2008, no material changes were made to the Firms valuation
models. For a further description of assets and liabilities carried at fair value, see Note 3 and
Note 4 on pages 98109, and 109111 respectively, of this Form 10-Q, and Note 4 and Note 5 on
pages 111118, and 119121, respectively, of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report. In addition,
for a further discussion of the significant judgments and estimates involved in the determination
of the fair value of the above instruments, as well as the process to validate valuation models,
see Certain risk exposures that are carried at fair value in Note 3 on pages 105107 of this Form
10-Q, and Fair value of financial instruments, MSRs and commodities inventory on pages 9798, and
Model review on page 94 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
Fair value hierarchy
The following tables summarize the Firms assets accounted for at fair value on a recurring basis
by level within the valuation hierarchy at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
Debt and |
|
Derivative |
|
AFS |
|
Mortgage |
|
Private |
|
|
|
|
|
(in billions) |
|
equity securities |
|
receivables |
|
securities |
|
servicing rights |
|
equity |
|
Other(c) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
15% |
(a) |
Level 2 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
96 |
(a) |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
78 |
(a) |
Level 3 |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
4 |
(a) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
7 |
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at fair value |
|
$ |
401.6 |
|
|
$ |
118.6 |
(b) |
|
$ |
150.7 |
|
|
$ |
17.0 |
|
|
$ |
7.5 |
|
|
$ |
108.3 |
|
|
$ |
803.7 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
Debt and |
|
Derivative |
|
AFS |
|
Mortgage |
|
Private |
|
|
|
|
|
(in billions) |
|
equity securities |
|
receivables |
|
securities |
|
servicing rights |
|
equity |
|
Other(c) |
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
2 |
%(a) |
|
|
84 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
21 |
%(a) |
Level 2 |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
96 |
(a) |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
74 |
(a) |
Level 3 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
5 |
(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets at fair value |
|
$ |
414.3 |
|
|
$ |
77.1 |
(b) |
|
$ |
85.4 |
|
|
$ |
8.6 |
|
|
$ |
7.2 |
|
|
$ |
42.9 |
|
|
$ |
635.5 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Based upon the fair value of the Firms derivatives portfolio prior to FIN 39 netting to
reflect the legally enforceable master netting agreements and cash collateral held by the
Firm, as cross-product netting is not relevant to an analysis based upon valuation
methodologies. |
(b) |
|
Reflects the balance recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets which is after FIN 39
netting. The amount of derivatives at fair value prior to FIN 39 netting for derivative
receivables was $1,333.8 billion and $909.9 billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31,
2007, respectively, and for total assets at fair value was $2,018.9 billion and $1,468.2
billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(c) |
|
Includes certain securities purchased under resale agreements, certain securities borrowed,
certain loans (excluding loans classified within trading assets debt and equity
instruments) and certain retained interests in securitizations. For further information, see
Note 3 on pages 98109 of this Form 10-Q. |
In
addition to assets carried at fair value on a recurring basis,
certain loans, classified within level 3, are accounted for at fair
value on a nonrecurring basis. Such loans are accounted for at the
lower of cost or fair value and are therefore only subject to fair value
adjustments under certain circumstances. These loans, along with the
recurring level 3 assets in the table above, comprise the Firms
total level 3 assets for the purposes of the percentage calculations
that follow. At September 30, 2008, total level 3 assets
were 18% of total assets measured at fair value and 6% of the total assets of
the Firm. Excluding level 3 assets for which the Firm does not bear
economic exposure (see Note 3 on pages 98109 of this Form 10-Q)
total level 3 assets were 16% of total assets measured at fair value and
5% of total assets of the Firm. At December 31, 2007, total
level 3 assets were 13% of total assets measured at fair value and 5% of
the total assets of the Firm.
Level 3
assets increased $57.0 billion in the first nine months of 2008 principally due to the
following: the acquisition of $41.5 billion of level 3 assets as a result of the merger with Bear
Stearns; the purchase of approximately $4.4 billion of reverse mortgages in the first quarter for
which there is limited pricing information and a lack of market liquidity; and transfers into level
3 of $9.8 billion of mortgage-related assets and
$14.0 billion of AAA-rated collateralized loan obligations
(CLOs) backed by corporate loans. The transfer of
mortgage-related assets and CLOs was based
upon a significant reduction in new deal issuance that limited the Firms ability to obtain
independent quotes. Mortgage-related assets included commercial mortgage-backed securities with a rating below AAA, other noninvestment grade mortgage
securities and certain prime mortgage loans. For a further discussion of changes in level 3
instruments, see Note 3 on pages 98109 of this Form 10-Q.
86
Imprecision of fair value estimates
The methods described above may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net
realizable value or that is reflective of future fair values. Imprecision in estimating unobservable market
inputs can impact the amount of revenue or loss recorded for a particular position. Furthermore,
while the Firm believes its valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market
participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of
certain financial instruments could result in a different estimate of fair value at the reporting
date. For a detailed discussion of the determination of fair value for individual financial
instruments, see Note 4 on pages 111118 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
Goodwill impairment
For a description of the significant valuation judgments associated with goodwill impairment, see
Goodwill impairment on page 98 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
During the third quarter of 2008, the Firm considered declining fair values of the reporting units
due to current market conditions. Although the fair values of the reporting units decreased, their
estimated fair values are still considered to be in excess of their respective carrying values.
Based upon this analysis, the Firm concluded that goodwill was not impaired at September 30, 2008.
Income taxes
JPMorgan Chase is subject to the income tax laws of the various jurisdictions in which it operates,
including U.S. and non-U.S. jurisdictions. These laws are often complex and may be subject to
different interpretations. To determine the financial statement impact of its accounting for income
taxes, including the provision for income tax expense and unrecognized tax benefits, JPMorgan Chase
must make assumptions and judgments about how to interpret and apply these complex tax laws to
numerous transactions and business events. For a further description of accounting estimates
related to income taxes, see Income taxes on page 98 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING DEVELOPMENTS
Derivatives netting amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39
In April 2007, the FASB issued
FSP FIN 39-1, which permits offsetting of cash collateral receivables or payables with net
derivative positions under certain circumstances. The Firm adopted FSP FIN 39-1 effective January
1, 2008. The FSP did not have a material impact on the Firms Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Accounting for income tax benefits of dividends on share-based payment awards
In June 2007, the FASB
ratified EITF 06-11, which must be applied prospectively for dividends declared in fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2007. EITF 06-11 requires that realized tax benefits from dividends or
dividend equivalents paid on equity-classified share-based payment awards that are charged to
retained earnings be recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital and included in the pool
of excess tax benefits available to absorb tax deficiencies on share-based payment awards. Prior to
the issuance of EITF 06-11, the Firm did not include these tax benefits as part of this pool of
excess tax benefits. The Firm adopted EITF 06-11 on January 1, 2008. The adoption of this consensus
did not have an impact on the Firms Consolidated Balance Sheets or results of operations.
Fair value measurements written loan commitments
In November 2007, the SEC issued SAB 109, which
revises and rescinds portions of SAB 105. Specifically, SAB 109 states that the expected net future
cash flows related to the associated servicing of the loan should be included in the measurement of
all written loan commitments that are accounted for at fair value through earnings. The provisions
of SAB 109 are applicable to written loan commitments issued or modified beginning on January 1,
2008. The Firm adopted SAB 109 on January 1, 2008. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have
a material impact on the Firms Consolidated Balance Sheets or results of operations.
Business combinations/noncontrolling interests in consolidated financial statements
In December
2007, the FASB issued SFAS 141R and SFAS 160, which amend the accounting and reporting of business
combinations, as well as noncontrolling (i.e., minority) interests. JPMorgan Chase continues to
evaluate the impact that SFAS 141R and SFAS 160 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
For JPMorgan Chase, SFAS 141R is effective for business combinations that close on or after January
1, 2009. SFAS 160 is effective for JPMorgan Chase for fiscal years beginning on or after December
15, 2008.
87
Accounting for transfers of financial assets and repurchase financing transactions
In February 2008,
the FASB issued FSP FAS 140-3, which requires an initial transfer of a financial asset and a
repurchase financing that was entered into contemporaneously with, or in contemplation of, the
initial transfer to be evaluated together as a linked transaction under SFAS 140, unless certain
criteria are met. FSP FAS 140-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008,
and will be applied to new transactions entered into after the date of adoption. The Firm is
currently evaluating the impact the adoption of FSP FAS 140-3 will have on the Firms consolidated
financial statements.
Disclosures
about derivative instruments and hedging activities FASB
Statement No. 161
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS 161, which amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS 133. SFAS 161
requires increased disclosures about derivative instruments and hedging activities and their
effects on an entitys financial position, financial performance and cash flows. SFAS 161 is
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, with early adoption permitted. SFAS
161 will only affect JPMorgan Chases disclosures of derivative instruments and related hedging
activities, and not its consolidated financial position, financial performance or cash flows.
Determining whether instruments granted in share-based payment transactions are participating
securities
In June 2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, which addresses whether instruments granted in
share-based payment transactions are participating securities prior to vesting and, therefore, need
to be included in the earnings allocation in computing earnings per share under the two-class
method. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. The Firm is currently evaluating
the impact the adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 will have on its consolidated financial statements.
Disclosures about credit derivatives and certain guarantees
In September 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4, Disclosures about Credit
Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation
No. 45; and Clarification of the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161. The FSP requires
enhanced disclosures about credit derivatives and guarantees to address the potential adverse
effects of changes in credit risk on the financial position, financial performance, and cash flows
of the sellers of credit derivatives. The FSP is effective for reporting periods ending after
November 15, 2008, with earlier application permitted. FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4 will only affect
JPMorgan Chases disclosures of credit derivatives sold and guarantees and not its consolidated
financial position, financial performance or cash flows.
Accounting for transfers of financial assets and consolidation of variable interest entities
In September 2008, the FASB issued for comment amendments to both SFAS 140 and FIN 46R that would
impact the accounting for transactions that involve QSPEs and VIEs. Among other things, the FASB is
proposing to (1) eliminate the concept of QSPEs from both SFAS 140 and FIN 46R; (2) make key
changes to the consolidation model of FIN 46R that will change the method of determining which
party to a VIE should consolidate the VIE from the current risks and rewards-based consolidation
model to a primarily qualitative model based upon control; and (3) reconsider the party that
consolidates the VIE on a quarterly basis. Entities expected to be impacted included revolving
securitizations entities and bank-administered asset-backed commercial paper conduits; mortgage
securitization entities will require further evaluation. The accounting impact of the proposed
amendments cannot be determined until the FASB issues a final statement amending SFAS 140 and FIN
46R, which is expected to occur during the first quarter of 2009.
Determining the fair value of an asset when the market for that asset is not active
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-3, which clarifies the application of SFAS 157 in
a market that is not active and provides an example to illustrate key considerations in determining
the fair value of a financial instrument when the market for that financial asset is not active.
The FSP was effective upon issuance, including prior periods for which financial statements have
not been issued. The application of this FSP did not have an impact on the Firms Consolidated
Balance Sheets or results of operations.
88
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment banking fees |
|
$ |
1,316 |
|
|
$ |
1,336 |
|
|
$ |
4,144 |
|
|
$ |
4,973 |
|
Principal transactions |
|
|
(2,763 |
) |
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
(2,814 |
) |
|
|
8,850 |
|
Lending & deposit-related fees |
|
|
1,168 |
|
|
|
1,026 |
|
|
|
3,312 |
|
|
|
2,872 |
|
Asset management, administration and commissions |
|
|
3,485 |
|
|
|
3,663 |
|
|
|
10,709 |
|
|
|
10,460 |
|
Securities gains |
|
|
424 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Mortgage fees and related income |
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
1,220 |
|
Credit card income |
|
|
1,771 |
|
|
|
1,777 |
|
|
|
5,370 |
|
|
|
5,054 |
|
Other income |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
289 |
|
|
|
1,576 |
|
|
|
1,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
|
5,743 |
|
|
|
9,199 |
|
|
|
25,079 |
|
|
|
34,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
17,326 |
|
|
|
18,806 |
|
|
|
51,387 |
|
|
|
52,768 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
8,332 |
|
|
|
11,893 |
|
|
|
26,440 |
|
|
|
33,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
8,994 |
|
|
|
6,913 |
|
|
|
24,947 |
|
|
|
19,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
14,737 |
|
|
|
16,112 |
|
|
|
50,026 |
|
|
|
53,988 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
5,787 |
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
13,666 |
|
|
|
4,322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation expense |
|
|
5,858 |
|
|
|
4,677 |
|
|
|
17,722 |
|
|
|
17,220 |
|
Occupancy expense |
|
|
766 |
|
|
|
657 |
|
|
|
2,083 |
|
|
|
1,949 |
|
Technology, communications and equipment expense |
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
950 |
|
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
|
2,793 |
|
Professional & outside services |
|
|
1,451 |
|
|
|
1,260 |
|
|
|
4,234 |
|
|
|
3,719 |
|
Marketing |
|
|
453 |
|
|
|
561 |
|
|
|
1,412 |
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
1,096 |
|
|
|
812 |
|
|
|
2,498 |
|
|
|
2,560 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
305 |
|
|
|
349 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
Merger costs |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total noninterest expense |
|
|
11,137 |
|
|
|
9,327 |
|
|
|
32,245 |
|
|
|
30,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense and extraordinary gain |
|
|
(2,187 |
) |
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
4,115 |
|
|
|
18,683 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(2,133 |
) |
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
6,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
3,373 |
|
|
|
4,322 |
|
|
|
12,394 |
|
Extraordinary gain |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
527 |
|
|
$ |
3,373 |
|
|
$ |
4,903 |
|
|
$ |
12,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common stock |
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
$ |
3,373 |
|
|
$ |
4,652 |
|
|
$ |
12,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share data |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
$ |
3.63 |
|
Net income |
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
1.00 |
|
|
|
1.36 |
|
|
|
3.63 |
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain |
|
|
(0.06 |
) |
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
|
Net income |
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
0.97 |
|
|
|
1.32 |
|
|
|
3.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average basic shares |
|
|
3,444.6 |
|
|
|
3,375.9 |
|
|
|
3,422.3 |
|
|
|
3,415.8 |
|
Average diluted shares |
|
|
3,444.6 |
|
|
|
3,477.7 |
|
|
|
3,525.3 |
|
|
|
3,519.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends per common share |
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.38 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
1.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) are an integral part of these statements.
89
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions, except share data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
54,350 |
|
|
$ |
40,144 |
|
Deposits with banks |
|
|
34,372 |
|
|
|
11,466 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements (included $20,071 and $19,131 at fair value at
September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
|
233,668 |
|
|
|
170,897 |
|
Securities borrowed (included $3,706 and zero at fair value at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
respectively) |
|
|
152,050 |
|
|
|
84,184 |
|
Trading assets (included assets pledged of $134,114 and $79,229 at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
respectively) |
|
|
520,257 |
|
|
|
491,409 |
|
Securities (included $150,743 and $85,406 at fair value at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
respectively, and assets pledged of $12,798 and $3,958 at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
respectively) |
|
|
150,779 |
|
|
|
85,450 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans (included $9,396 and $8,739 at fair value at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
|
761,381 |
|
|
|
519,374 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(19,052 |
) |
|
|
(9,234 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses |
|
|
742,329 |
|
|
|
510,140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest and accounts receivable |
|
|
104,232 |
|
|
|
24,823 |
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
9,962 |
|
|
|
9,319 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
46,121 |
|
|
|
45,270 |
|
Other intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
17,048 |
|
|
|
8,632 |
|
Purchased credit card relationships |
|
|
1,827 |
|
|
|
2,303 |
|
All other intangibles |
|
|
3,653 |
|
|
|
3,796 |
|
Other assets (included $82,504 and $22,151 at fair value at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
respectively) |
|
|
180,821 |
|
|
|
74,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
2,251,469 |
|
|
$ |
1,562,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits (included $6,038 and $6,389 at fair value at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
$ |
969,783 |
|
|
$ |
740,728 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements (included $3,321 and $5,768 at
fair value at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
|
224,075 |
|
|
|
154,398 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
54,480 |
|
|
|
49,596 |
|
Other borrowed funds (included $67,241 and $10,777 at fair value at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
respectively) |
|
|
167,827 |
|
|
|
28,835 |
|
Trading liabilities |
|
|
162,029 |
|
|
|
157,867 |
|
Accounts
payable, accrued expense and other liabilities (included the allowance for lending-related commitments of $713 and $850 at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively, and $25 at fair value at
December 31, 2007) |
|
|
260,563 |
|
|
|
94,476 |
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated variable interest entities (included $3,317 and $3,004 at fair value at
September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
|
11,437 |
|
|
|
14,016 |
|
Long-term debt (included $67,950 and $70,456 at fair value at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
respectively) |
|
|
238,034 |
|
|
|
183,862 |
|
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures held by trusts that issued guaranteed capital debt securities |
|
|
17,398 |
|
|
|
15,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,105,626 |
|
|
|
1,438,926 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 27 of this Form 10-Q) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock ($1 par value; authorized 200,000,000 shares at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007;
issued 2,538,107 and 0 shares at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
|
8,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock ($1 par value; authorized 9,000,000,000 shares at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007;
issued 3,941,633,895 shares and 3,657,671,234 shares at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
respectively) |
|
|
3,942 |
|
|
|
3,658 |
|
Capital surplus |
|
|
90,535 |
|
|
|
78,597 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
55,217 |
|
|
|
54,715 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(2,227 |
) |
|
|
(917 |
) |
Shares held in RSU Trust, at cost (5,908,094 shares at September 30, 2008) |
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost (214,686,844 shares at September 30, 2008, and 290,288,540 shares at December 31, 2007) |
|
|
(9,509 |
) |
|
|
(12,832 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
145,843 |
|
|
|
123,221 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
2,251,469 |
|
|
$ |
1,562,147 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) are an integral part of these statements.
90
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock |
|
|
7,800 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance
of preferred stock conversion of Bear Stearns preferred stock |
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30 |
|
|
8,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
|
3,658 |
|
|
|
3,658 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30 |
|
|
3,942 |
|
|
|
3,658 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital surplus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
|
78,597 |
|
|
|
77,807 |
|
Issuance of common stock |
|
|
11,201 |
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock issue cost |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Shares issued and commitments to issue common stock for employee |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
stock-based compensation awards and related tax effects |
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
488 |
|
Net change from the Bear Stearns merger: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reissuance of treasury stock and the Share Exchange agreement |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee stock awards |
|
|
242 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30 |
|
|
90,535 |
|
|
|
78,295 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
|
54,715 |
|
|
|
43,600 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, adjusted |
|
|
54,715 |
|
|
|
44,515 |
|
Net income |
|
|
4,903 |
|
|
|
12,394 |
|
Dividends on common stock ($1.14 and $1.10 per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and
2007, respectively) |
|
|
(4,150 |
) |
|
|
(3,845 |
) |
Dividends on preferred stock |
|
|
(251 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30 |
|
|
55,217 |
|
|
|
53,064 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
|
(917 |
) |
|
|
(1,557 |
) |
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, adjusted |
|
|
(917 |
) |
|
|
(1,558 |
) |
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(1,310 |
) |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30 |
|
|
(2,227 |
) |
|
|
(1,830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares held in RSU Trust |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resulting from the Bear Stearns merger |
|
|
(269 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Reissuance from RSU Trust |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30 |
|
|
(267 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1 |
|
|
(12,832 |
) |
|
|
(7,718 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,015 |
) |
Reissuance from treasury stock |
|
|
2,174 |
|
|
|
2,659 |
|
Share repurchases related to employee stock-based compensation awards |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(135 |
) |
Net change from the Bear Stearns merger as a result of the reissuance of treasury stock and the Share
Exchange agreement |
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30 |
|
|
(9,509 |
) |
|
|
(13,209 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
$ |
145,843 |
|
|
$ |
119,978 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,903 |
|
|
$ |
12,394 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
(1,310 |
) |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
$ |
3,593 |
|
|
$ |
12,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) are an integral part of these statements.
91
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
4,903 |
|
|
$ |
12,394 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
13,666 |
|
|
|
4,322 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
2,313 |
|
|
|
1,705 |
|
Amortization of intangibles |
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
1,055 |
|
Deferred tax (benefit) expense |
|
|
(2,974 |
) |
|
|
(518 |
) |
Investment securities (gains) losses |
|
|
(1,104 |
) |
|
|
(16 |
) |
Proceeds on sale of investment |
|
|
(1,739 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation |
|
|
2,085 |
|
|
|
1,509 |
|
Originations and purchases of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
(29,552 |
) |
|
|
(87,446 |
) |
Proceeds from sales, securitizations and paydowns of loans held-for-sale |
|
|
32,197 |
|
|
|
88,276 |
|
Net change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets |
|
|
18,933 |
|
|
|
(74,405 |
) |
Securities borrowed |
|
|
(12,605 |
) |
|
|
(11,009 |
) |
Accrued interest and accounts receivable |
|
|
(33,480 |
) |
|
|
(3,510 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(16,875 |
) |
|
|
(21,592 |
) |
Trading liabilities |
|
|
(10,044 |
) |
|
|
5,785 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expense and other liabilities |
|
|
79,090 |
|
|
|
(2,732 |
) |
Other operating adjustments |
|
|
(13,346 |
) |
|
|
4,869 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
|
32,405 |
|
|
|
(81,313 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits with banks |
|
|
(15,162 |
) |
|
|
(13,167 |
) |
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
|
(76,166 |
) |
|
|
4,914 |
|
Held-to-maturity securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
Available-for-sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from maturities |
|
|
29,565 |
|
|
|
20,515 |
|
Proceeds from sales |
|
|
62,763 |
|
|
|
54,288 |
|
Purchases |
|
|
(146,480 |
) |
|
|
(81,131 |
) |
Proceeds from sales and securitization of loans held-for-investment |
|
|
26,430 |
|
|
|
26,582 |
|
Other changes in loans, net |
|
|
(67,081 |
) |
|
|
(49,979 |
) |
Net cash received from sale of an investment net of acquisitions |
|
|
2,162 |
|
|
|
(70 |
) |
Proceeds from assets sale to the FRBNY |
|
|
28,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net purchases of asset-backed commercial paper guaranteed by the FRBB |
|
|
(61,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
All other investing activities, net |
|
|
(3,097 |
) |
|
|
(3,284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(219,529 |
) |
|
|
(41,321 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
81,989 |
|
|
|
42,245 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
46,908 |
|
|
|
16,614 |
|
Commercial paper and other borrowed funds |
|
|
58,527 |
|
|
|
28,226 |
|
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt and trust preferred capital debt securities |
|
|
47,572 |
|
|
|
77,120 |
|
Repayments of long-term debt and trust preferred capital debt securities |
|
|
(50,290 |
) |
|
|
(40,442 |
) |
Excess tax benefits related to stock-based compensation |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
327 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
11,809 |
|
|
|
1,523 |
|
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock |
|
|
7,746 |
|
|
|
|
|
Repurchases of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,015 |
) |
Cash dividends paid |
|
|
(4,027 |
) |
|
|
(3,735 |
) |
All other financing activities, net |
|
|
1,316 |
|
|
|
818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
201,685 |
|
|
|
114,681 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and due from banks |
|
|
(355 |
) |
|
|
307 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks |
|
|
14,206 |
|
|
|
(7,646 |
) |
Cash and due from banks at the beginning of the year |
|
|
40,144 |
|
|
|
40,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks at the end of the period |
|
$ |
54,350 |
|
|
$ |
32,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash interest paid |
|
$ |
27,552 |
|
|
$ |
33,781 |
|
Cash income taxes paid |
|
|
2,831 |
|
|
|
4,202 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note: |
|
The fair values of noncash assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the merger with Bear Stearns were $288.2 billion and $287.7 billion,
respectively. Approximately 26 million shares of common stock, valued at approximately $1.2 billion, were issued in connection with the Bear Stearns
merger. The values of noncash assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the Washington Mutual transaction were $258.6 billion and $259.7 billion, respectively.
|
The
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) are an
integral part of these statements.
See Glossary of Terms on pages 156159 of this Form 10-Q for definitions of terms used
throughout the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)
NOTE 1 BASIS OF PRESENTATION
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPMorgan Chase or the Firm), a financial holding company incorporated
under Delaware law in 1968, is a leading global financial services firm and one of the largest
banking institutions in the United States of America (U.S.), with operations in more than 60
countries. The Firm is a leader in investment banking, financial services for consumers and
businesses, financial transaction processing and asset management. For a discussion of the Firms
business segment information, see Note 31 on pages 149153 of this Form 10-Q.
The accounting and financial reporting policies of JPMorgan Chase and its subsidiaries conform to
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP).
Additionally, where applicable, the policies conform to the accounting and reporting guidelines
prescribed by bank regulatory authorities. The unaudited consolidated financial statements prepared
in conformity with U.S. GAAP require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the
reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expense, and the disclosures of contingent
assets and liabilities. Actual results could be different from these estimates. In the opinion of
management, all normal recurring adjustments have been included for a fair statement of this
interim financial information. These unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included
in JPMorgan Chases Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007 (the 2007
Annual Report).
Certain amounts in the prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.
NOTE 2 BUSINESS CHANGES AND DEVELOPMENTS
Acquisition of the banking operations of Washington Mutual Bank
On September 25, 2008, JPMorgan Chase acquired the banking
operations of Washington Mutual Bank (Washington Mutual) from the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) for $1.9 billion. The acquisition expands JPMorgan
Chases consumer branch network into several states, including California, Florida and Washington,
among others. The acquisition also extends the reach of the Firms business banking, commercial
banking, credit card, consumer lending and wealth management businesses. The acquisition was
accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with SFAS 141. The results of
operations of Washington Mutuals banking operations for the period September 26, 2008, through
September 30, 2008, did not have a material effect on the quarter ended September 30, 2008, except
the charge to conform Washington Mutuals loan loss reserves and the extraordinary gain related to
the transaction which are reflected for JPMorgan Chase in the Corporate/Private Equity segment.
Beginning October 1, 2008, the results of operations of Washington Mutuals banking operations will
be included in the Firms business segments.
Washington Mutual purchase price allocation and negative goodwill
The $1.9 billion purchase price was allocated to the Washington Mutual assets acquired and
liabilities assumed using their allocated values as of September 25, 2008. This resulted in
negative goodwill. In accordance with SFAS 141, nonfinancial assets that are not held-for-sale,
such as the premises and equipment and other intangibles, acquired in the Washington Mutual
transaction were written down against the negative goodwill. The negative goodwill that remained
after writing down the nonfinancial assets was recognized as an extraordinary gain. The computation
of the purchase price and the allocation of the purchase price to the net assets acquired in the
Washington Mutual transaction based upon their respective values as of September 25, 2008, and
the resulting negative goodwill are presented below. The allocation of the purchase price may be
modified through September 25, 2009, as more information is obtained about the fair value of assets
acquired and liabilities assumed.
93
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington Mutuals net assets before fair value adjustments |
|
$ |
38,482 |
|
|
|
|
|
Washington Mutuals goodwill and other intangible assets |
|
|
(7,566 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
30,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reflect assets acquired at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets |
|
|
(591 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
(31,265 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
8,216 |
|
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest and accounts receivable |
|
|
(164 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
2,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts to reflect liabilities assumed at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
|
(638 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expense and other liabilities |
|
|
(507 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
1,023 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of net assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Negative goodwill before allocation to nonfinancial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,635 |
) |
Negative goodwill allocated to nonfinancial assets(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,054 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Negative goodwill resulting from the acquisition(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(581 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The acquisition was accounted for as a purchase business combination in accordance with
SFAS 141. SFAS 141 requires the assets (including identifiable intangible assets) and
liabilities (including executory contracts and other commitments) of an acquired business as
of the effective date of the acquisition to be recorded at their respective fair values and
consolidated with those of JPMorgan Chase. The fair value of the net assets of Washington
Mutuals banking operations exceeded the $1.9 billion purchase price, resulting in negative
goodwill. In accordance with SFAS 141, noncurrent, nonfinancial assets not held-for-sale, such
as premises and equipment and other intangibles, were written down against the negative
goodwill. The negative goodwill that remained after writing down transaction related core
deposit intangibles of approximately $4.9 billion and premises and equipment of approximately
$3.2 billion was recognized as an extraordinary gain of $581 million. |
(b) |
|
The extraordinary gain was recorded net of tax expense in Corporate/Private Equity. |
Condensed
statement of Washington Mutual net assets acquired
The following condensed statement of net assets acquired reflects the value assigned to the
Washington Mutual net assets as of September 25, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
September 25, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
3,680 |
|
Deposits with banks |
|
|
3,517 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
|
1,700 |
|
Trading assets |
|
|
5,691 |
|
Securities |
|
|
17,240 |
|
Loans (net of allowance for loan losses) |
|
|
206,189 |
|
Accrued interest and accounts receivable |
|
|
3,332 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
5,845 |
|
All other assets |
|
|
15,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
262,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
159,824 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
4,549 |
|
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
81,759 |
|
Trading liabilities |
|
|
585 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expense and other liabilities |
|
|
6,092 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
6,910 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
259,719 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Washington Mutual net assets |
|
$ |
2,519 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
Merger with The Bear Stearns Companies Inc.
Effective May 30, 2008, BSC Merger Corporation, a wholly-owned subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase, merged
with The Bear Stearns Companies Inc. (Bear Stearns) pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger,
dated as of March 16, 2008, as amended March 24, 2008, and Bear Stearns became a wholly-owned
subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase (the Merger). The Merger provides the Firm with a leading global
prime brokerage platform; strengthens the Firms equities and asset management businesses; enhances
capabilities in mortgage origination, securitization and servicing; and expands the platform of the
Firms energy business. The Merger was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting, which
requires that the assets and liabilities of Bear Stearns be fair valued. The total purchase price
to complete the Merger was $1.5 billion.
The Merger was accomplished through a series of transactions that were reflected as step
acquisitions in accordance with SFAS 141. On April 8, 2008, pursuant to the share exchange
agreement, JPMorgan Chase acquired 95 million newly issued shares of Bear Stearns common stock (or
39.5% of Bear Stearns common stock after giving effect to the issuance) for 21 million shares of
JPMorgan Chase common stock. Further, between March 24, 2008, and May 12, 2008, JPMorgan Chase
acquired approximately 24 million shares of Bear Stearns common stock in the open market at an
average purchase price of $12.37 per share. The share exchange and cash purchase transactions
resulted in JPMorgan Chase owning approximately 49.4% of Bear Stearns common stock immediately
prior to consummation of the Merger. Finally, on May 30, 2008, JPMorgan Chase completed the Merger,
and as a result of the Merger, each outstanding share of Bear Stearns common stock (other than
shares then held by JPMorgan Chase) was converted into the right to receive 0.21753 shares of
common stock of JPMorgan Chase. Also, on May 30, 2008, the shares of common stock that JPMorgan
Chase and Bear Stearns acquired from each other in the share exchange transaction were cancelled.
From April 8, 2008, through May 30, 2008, JPMorgan Chase accounted for the investment in Bear
Stearns under the equity method of accounting in accordance with APB 18. During this period,
JPMorgan Chase recorded reductions to its investment in Bear Stearns representing its share of Bear
Stearns net losses, which was recorded in other income and accumulated other comprehensive income.
Commencing May 31, 2008, Bear Stearns was reflected in JPMorgan Chases consolidated results of
operations.
In conjunction with the Merger, in June 2008, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the FRBNY)
took control, through a limited liability company (LLC) formed for this purpose, of a portfolio
of $30 billion in assets acquired from Bear Stearns, based upon the value of the portfolio as of
March 14, 2008. The assets of the LLC were funded by a $28.85 billion, term loan from the FRBNY,
and a $1.15 billion, subordinated loan from JPMorgan Chase. The JPMorgan Chase loan is subordinated
to the FRBNY loan and will bear the first $1.15 billion of any losses of the portfolio. Any
remaining assets in the portfolio after repayment of the FRBNY loan, the JPMorgan Chase loan and
the expense of the LLC, will be for the account of the FRBNY.
Bear Stearns purchase price allocation and goodwill
As a result of step acquisition accounting, the total $1.5 billion purchase price was allocated to
the Bear Stearns assets acquired and liabilities assumed using their fair values as of April 8,
2008, and May 30, 2008, respectively. The summary computation of the purchase price and the
allocation of the purchase price to the net assets of Bear Stearns are presented below. The
allocation of the purchase price may be modified through May 30, 2009, as more information is
obtained about the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except for shares (in thousands), per share amounts and where otherwise noted) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares exchanged in the Share Exchange transaction (April 8, 2008) |
|
|
95,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other Bear Stearns shares outstanding |
|
|
145,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Bear Stearns stock outstanding |
|
|
240,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of shares issued in the Share Exchange transaction |
|
|
(95,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Cancellation of shares acquired by JPMorgan Chase for cash in the open market |
|
|
(24,061 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bear Stearns common stock exchanged as of May 30, 2008 |
|
|
121,698 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange ratio |
|
|
0.21753 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JPMorgan Chase common stock issued |
|
|
26,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
Average purchase price per JPMorgan Chase common share(a) |
|
$ |
45.26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of JPMorgan Chase common stock issued |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,198 |
|
Bear Stearns common stock acquired for cash in the open market (24 million shares at an
average share price of $12.37 per share) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
298 |
|
Fair value of employee stock awards (largely to be settled by shares held in the RSU Trust(b)) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
242 |
|
Direct acquisition costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27 |
|
Less: Fair value of Bear Stearns common stock held in the RSU Trust and included in
the exchange of common stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(269 |
)(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bear Stearns common stockholders equity |
|
$ |
6,052 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reflect assets acquired at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading Assets |
|
|
(3,521 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Premises and equipment |
|
|
497 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts to reflect liabilities assumed at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
(2,303 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of net assets acquired excluding goodwill |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill resulting from the merger(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The value of JPMorgan Chase common stock was determined by averaging the closing prices of
JPMorgan Chases common stock for the four trading days during the period March 19, 2008,
through March 25, 2008. |
(b) |
|
Represents shares of Bear Stearns common stock held in an irrevocable grantor trust (the RSU
Trust) to be used to settle stock awards granted to selected employees and certain key
executives under certain heritage Bear Stearns employee stock plans. Shares in the RSU Trust
were exchanged for 6 million shares of JPMorgan Chase common stock at the merger exchange
ratio of 0.21753. For further discussion of the RSU trust, see Note 9 on page 16 of this Form
10-Q. |
(c) |
|
The goodwill was recorded in the Investment Bank, and is not tax deductible. |
Condensed
statement of Bear Stearns net assets acquired
The following condensed statement of net assets reflects the value assigned to Bear Stearns net
assets as of the merger date.
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
May 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
$ |
534 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements |
|
|
21,204 |
|
Securities borrowed |
|
|
55,195 |
|
Trading assets |
|
|
136,845 |
|
Loans |
|
|
4,407 |
|
Accrued interest and accounts receivable |
|
|
34,677 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
193 |
|
All other assets |
|
|
35,666 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
288,721 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements |
|
$ |
54,643 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
16,166 |
|
Trading liabilities |
|
|
24,267 |
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs |
|
|
47,042 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
66,954 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expense and other liabilities |
|
|
78,583 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
287,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bear Stearns net assets(a) |
|
$ |
1,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reflects the fair value assigned to 49.4% of the Bear Stearns net assets acquired on April
8, 2008 (net of related amortization) and the fair value assigned to the remaining 50.6% of
the Bear Stearns net assets acquired on May 30, 2008. The difference between the Bear Stearns
net assets acquired as presented above and the fair value of the net assets acquired
(including goodwill) presented in the previous table represents JPMorgan Chases net losses
recorded under the equity method of accounting. |
96
Unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information reflecting Washington Mutual and
Bear Stearns
The following unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information presents the results of
operations of the Firm as they may have appeared if the Bear Stearns Merger and the Washington
Mutual transaction had been completed on January 1, 2008, and January 1, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except per share data) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
17,089 |
|
|
$ |
20,924 |
|
|
$ |
52,173 |
|
|
$ |
71,928 |
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain |
|
|
(4,199 |
) |
|
|
4,043 |
|
|
|
(12,569 |
) |
|
|
16,421 |
|
Net income
(loss) |
|
|
(3,618 |
) |
|
|
4,043 |
|
|
|
(11,988 |
) |
|
|
16,421 |
|
Net income per common share data: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain |
|
$ |
(1.25 |
) |
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
$ |
(3.73 |
) |
|
$ |
4.77 |
|
Net income
(loss) |
|
|
(1.08 |
) |
|
|
1.19 |
|
|
|
(3.57 |
) |
|
|
4.77 |
|
Diluted earnings per share(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain |
|
|
(1.25 |
) |
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
(3.73 |
) |
|
|
4.63 |
|
Net income
(loss) |
|
|
(1.08 |
) |
|
|
1.15 |
|
|
|
(3.57 |
) |
|
|
4.63 |
|
Average basic common shares issued and outstanding |
|
|
3,445 |
|
|
|
3,401 |
|
|
|
3,435 |
|
|
|
3,442 |
|
Average diluted common shares issued and
outstanding(a) |
|
|
3,445 |
|
|
|
3,503 |
|
|
|
3,435 |
|
|
|
3,546 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Common equivalent shares have been excluded from the pro forma computation of diluted loss
per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008, as the effect would be
antidilutive. |
The unaudited pro forma combined financial information is presented for illustrative purposes
only and does not indicate the financial results of the combined company had the companies actually
been combined as of January 1, 2008, and January 1, 2007, nor is it indicative of the results of
operations in future periods. Included in the unaudited pro forma combined financial information
for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, and the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and
2007, were pro forma adjustments to reflect the results of operations of Bear Stearns and
Washington Mutuals banking operations, considering the purchase
accounting, valuation and accounting conformity adjustments related
to each transaction. For the Washington Mutual transaction, the
amortization of purchase accounting adjustments to report acquired
interest-bearing assets and liabilities at current interest rates is
reflected in all periods presented. Valuation adjustments and the
adjustment to conform allowance methodologies in the Washington
Mutual transaction are reflected in the results for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. Valuation and accounting
conformity adjustments related to the Bear Stearns merger are
reflected in the results for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007.
Termination of Chase Paymentech Solutions joint venture
The dissolution of Chase Paymentech Solutions, a global payments and merchant acquiring joint
venture between JPMorgan Chase and First Data Corporation, was completed on November 1, 2008 and
JPMorgan Chase retained approximately 51% of the business under the Chase Paymentech name.
The dissolution of Chase Paymentech Solutions is being accounted for as a step acquisition in
accordance with SFAS 141, and the Firm anticipates recognizing an after-tax gain of approximately $600
million in the fourth quarter of 2008 as a result of the dissolution. The gain will represent the amount by which the fair value of the net assets acquired (predominantly intangible
assets and goodwill) exceeded JPMorgan Chases book basis in the net assets transferred to First
Data Corporation.
Issuance of common stock
On September 30, 2008, the Firm issued $11.5 billion, or 284 million shares, of its common stock at
$40.50 per share. Proceeds from this issuance were used for general corporate purposes.
Internal reorganization related to the Merger
On June 30, 2008, JPMorgan Chase fully and unconditionally guaranteed each series of outstanding
preferred stock of Bear Stearns, as well as all of Bear Stearns outstanding Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC) registered U.S. debt securities and obligations relating to trust
preferred securities. Subsequently, on July 15, 2008, JPMorgan Chase completed an internal merger
transaction, which resulted in each series of outstanding preferred stock of Bear Stearns being
automatically exchanged into newly issued shares of JPMorgan Chase preferred stock having
substantially identical terms. Depositary shares, which formerly had represented a one-fourth
interest in a share of Bear Stearns preferred stock, continue to trade on the New York Stock
Exchange, but following completion of this internal merger
97
transaction, represent a one-fourth interest in a share of JPMorgan Chase preferred stock. In
addition, on July 31, 2008, JPMorgan Chase assumed (1) all of Bear Stearns then-outstanding
SEC-registered U.S. debt securities; (2) Bear Stearns obligations relating to trust preferred
securities; (3) certain of Bear Stearns then-outstanding foreign debt securities; and (4) certain
of Bear Stearns guarantees of then-outstanding foreign debt securities issued by subsidiaries of
Bear Stearns, in each case, in accordance with the agreements and indentures governing these
securities. JPMorgan Chase also guaranteed Bear Stearns obligations under Bear Stearns U.S. $30.0
billion Euro Medium Term Note Programme and U.S. $4.0 billion Euro Note Issuance Programme.
Issuance of preferred stock
On April 23, 2008, the Firm issued $6.0 billion of noncumulative perpetual preferred stock. The
Firm also issued $1.8 billion of noncumulative perpetual preferred stock on August 21, 2008. The
proceeds of these issuances were used for general corporate purposes. For information regarding the
preferred stock issued by the Firm on July 15, 2008, in exchange for the Bear Stearns preferred
stock, see Internal reorganization related to the Merger above.
Proceeds from Visa Inc. shares
On March 19, 2008, Visa Inc. (Visa) completed its initial public offering (IPO). Prior to the
IPO, JPMorgan Chase held approximately a 13% equity interest in Visa. On March 28, 2008, Visa used
a portion of the proceeds from the offering to redeem a portion of the Firms equity interest,
which resulted in the recognition of a pretax gain of $1.5 billion (recorded in other income). In
conjunction with the IPO, Visa placed $3.0 billion in escrow to cover liabilities related to
certain litigation matters. JPMorgan Chases share of this escrow was $696 million. JPMorgan
Chases interest in the escrow was recorded as a reduction to other expense and reported net of
established litigation reserves.
Purchase of additional interest in Highbridge Capital Management
In January 2008, JPMorgan Chase purchased an additional equity interest in Highbridge Capital
Management, LLC (Highbridge). As a result, the Firm currently owns 77.5% of Highbridge. The Firm
acquired a majority interest in Highbridge in 2004.
NOTE
3 FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT
For a discussion of JPMorgan Chases valuation methodologies for assets and liabilities measured at
fair value, see Note 4 on pages 111114 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
Valuation Hierarchy
SFAS 157 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosure of fair value measurements.
The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency of inputs to the valuation of an asset or
liability as of the measurement date. The three levels are defined as follows.
|
|
Level 1 inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical
assets or liabilities in active markets. |
|
|
|
Level 2 inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and
liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability,
either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. |
|
|
|
Level 3 inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair
value measurement. For an analysis of level 3 assets, see pages
103104 of this Note. |
A financial instruments categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest
level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
98
The following table presents the financial instruments carried at fair value as of September 30,
2008, and December 31, 2007, by caption on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and by SFAS 157
valuation hierarchy (as described above).
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal models |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted market |
|
|
Internal models with |
|
|
with significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total carrying |
|
|
|
prices in active |
|
|
significant observable |
|
|
unobservable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
value in the |
|
|
|
markets |
|
|
market parameters |
|
|
market parameters |
|
|
FIN 39 |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
September 30, 2008 (in millions) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
netting(d) |
|
|
Balance Sheets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased
under resale agreements |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,071 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,071 |
|
Securities borrowed |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,706 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government, agency, sponsored
enterprise and non-U.S. government |
|
|
105,836 |
|
|
|
35,064 |
|
|
|
485 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
141,385 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,344 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,444 |
|
CD, bankers acceptances and
commercial paper |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
7,561 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,086 |
|
Corporate debt and other |
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
59,361 |
|
|
|
7,545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,093 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
85,349 |
|
|
|
11,521 |
|
|
|
1,840 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
98,710 |
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,006 |
|
|
|
21,133 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,139 |
|
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,429 |
|
|
|
14,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,708 |
|
Physical commodities(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,044 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt and equity instruments: |
|
|
191,897 |
|
|
|
163,330 |
|
|
|
46,382 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
401,609 |
|
Derivative receivables |
|
|
3,669 |
|
|
|
1,283,505 |
|
|
|
46,665 |
|
|
|
(1,215,191 |
) |
|
|
118,648 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading assets |
|
|
195,566 |
|
|
|
1,446,835 |
|
|
|
93,047 |
|
|
|
(1,215,191 |
) |
|
|
520,257 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
95,246 |
|
|
|
44,844 |
|
|
|
10,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150,743 |
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,931 |
|
|
|
7,465 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,396 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity investments |
|
|
209 |
|
|
|
391 |
|
|
|
6,927 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,527 |
|
All other |
|
|
7,877 |
|
|
|
61,428 |
|
|
|
5,672 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,977 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
8,086 |
|
|
|
61,819 |
|
|
|
12,599 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,504 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
298,898 |
|
|
$ |
1,579,206 |
|
|
$ |
140,812 |
|
|
$ |
(1,215,191 |
) |
|
$ |
803,725 |
|
Less: Level 3 assets for which the Firm does not
bear
economic exposure(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,511 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total level 3 assets for which the Firm
bears
economic exposure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
119,301 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,721 |
|
|
$ |
1,317 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,038 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities
loaned
or sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,321 |
|
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,128 |
|
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments |
|
|
57,151 |
|
|
|
18,673 |
|
|
|
389 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,213 |
|
Derivative payables |
|
|
3,542 |
|
|
|
1,246,955 |
|
|
|
38,774 |
|
|
|
(1,203,455 |
) |
|
|
85,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading liabilities |
|
|
60,693 |
|
|
|
1,265,628 |
|
|
|
39,163 |
|
|
|
(1,203,455 |
) |
|
|
162,029 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expense and
other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial interests issued by
consolidated VIEs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,722 |
|
|
|
595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,317 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,471 |
|
|
|
19,479 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
67,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
60,693 |
|
|
$ |
1,391,991 |
|
|
$ |
60,667 |
|
|
$ |
(1,203,455 |
) |
|
$ |
309,896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted market |
|
|
Internal models with |
|
|
Internal models |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total carrying |
|
|
|
prices in active |
|
|
significant observable |
|
|
with significant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
value in the |
|
|
|
markets |
|
|
market parameters |
|
|
unobservable market |
|
|
FIN 39 |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
December 31, 2007 (in millions) |
|
(Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
parameters (Level 3) |
|
|
netting(d) |
|
|
Balance Sheets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased
under resale agreements |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,131 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
19,131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government, agency, sponsored
enterprise and non-U.S. government |
|
|
106,572 |
|
|
|
40,362 |
|
|
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
147,192 |
|
State and municipal securities |
|
|
7,230 |
|
|
|
5,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,090 |
|
CD, bankers acceptances and
commercial paper |
|
|
3,019 |
|
|
|
5,233 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,252 |
|
Corporate debt and other |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
52,137 |
|
|
|
7,972 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60,115 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
82,499 |
|
|
|
9,552 |
|
|
|
1,197 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
93,248 |
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,038 |
|
|
|
11,776 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57,814 |
|
Mortgage- and asset-backed securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,209 |
|
|
|
2,863 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,072 |
|
Physical commodities(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,490 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt and equity instruments: |
|
|
199,326 |
|
|
|
190,881 |
|
|
|
24,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
414,273 |
|
Derivative receivables |
|
|
18,574 |
|
|
|
871,105 |
|
|
|
20,188 |
|
|
|
(832,731 |
) |
|
|
77,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading assets |
|
|
217,900 |
|
|
|
1,061,986 |
|
|
|
44,254 |
|
|
|
(832,731 |
) |
|
|
491,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
71,941 |
|
|
|
13,364 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85,406 |
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
359 |
|
|
|
8,380 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,739 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity investments |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
6,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,153 |
|
All other |
|
|
10,784 |
|
|
|
1,054 |
|
|
|
3,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other assets |
|
|
10,852 |
|
|
|
1,376 |
|
|
|
9,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value |
|
$ |
300,693 |
|
|
$ |
1,096,216 |
|
|
$ |
71,290 |
|
|
$ |
(832,731 |
) |
|
$ |
635,468 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,228 |
|
|
$ |
1,161 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
6,389 |
|
Federal funds purchased and securities
loaned or sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,768 |
|
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,672 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments |
|
|
73,023 |
|
|
|
15,659 |
|
|
|
480 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,162 |
|
Derivative payables |
|
|
19,553 |
|
|
|
852,055 |
|
|
|
19,555 |
|
|
|
(822,458 |
) |
|
|
68,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading liabilities |
|
|
92,576 |
|
|
|
867,714 |
|
|
|
20,035 |
|
|
|
(822,458 |
) |
|
|
157,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expense and
other liabilities(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
Beneficial interests issued by
consolidated VIEs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,922 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,004 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
48,518 |
|
|
|
21,938 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities at fair value |
|
$ |
92,576 |
|
|
$ |
940,822 |
|
|
$ |
43,346 |
|
|
$ |
(822,458 |
) |
|
$ |
254,286 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Physical commodities inventories are accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value. |
(b) |
|
Included assets for which the Firm serves as an intermediary between two parties and does not
bear market risk. The assets are principally reflected within derivative receivables. |
(c) |
|
Included is the fair value adjustment for unfunded lending-related commitments accounted for
at fair value. |
(d) |
|
As permitted under FIN 39, the Firm has elected to net derivative receivables and derivative
payables and the related cash collateral received and paid when a legally enforceable master
netting agreement exists. The increase in FIN 39 netting from
December 31, 2007, was primarily due to the effect of currency and equity market volatility on foreign
exchange and equity derivative contracts. |
Balances for which the Firm did not bear economic exposure at December 31, 2007, were not
significant.
Changes in level 3 recurring fair value measurements
The table below includes a rollforward of the balance sheet amounts for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 (including the change in fair value), for financial instruments
classified by the Firm within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. When a determination is made to
classify a financial instrument within level 3, the determination is based upon the significance of
the unobservable parameters to the overall fair value measurement. However, level 3 financial
instruments typically include, in addition to the unobservable or level 3 components, observable
components
100
(that is, components that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources);
accordingly, the gains and losses in the table below include changes in fair value due, in part, to
observable factors that are part of the valuation methodology. Also, the Firm risk manages the
observable components of level 3 financial instruments using securities and derivative positions
that are classified within level 1 or 2 of the valuation hierarchy; as these level 1 and level 2
risk management instruments are not included below, the gains or losses in the tables do not
reflect the effect of the Firms risk management activities related to such level 3 instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs |
|
|
gains and (losses) |
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Total realized/ |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfers in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to financial |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
Fair value, |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
issuances |
|
|
and/or out of |
|
|
Fair value, |
|
|
instruments at |
|
(in millions) |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
|
gains/(losses)(c) |
|
|
settlements, net |
|
|
level 3(c) |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments |
|
$ |
58,896 |
|
|
$ |
(4,288) |
(d)(e) |
|
$ |
(12,884 |
) |
|
$ |
4,658 |
|
|
$ |
46,382 |
|
|
$ |
(3,515) |
(d)(e) |
Net derivative receivables |
|
|
5,975 |
|
|
|
2,535 |
(d) |
|
|
(1,399 |
) |
|
|
780 |
|
|
|
7,891 |
|
|
|
3,248 |
(d) |
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
(741) |
(f) |
|
|
1,644 |
|
|
|
9,479 |
|
|
|
10,653 |
|
|
|
(740) |
(f) |
Loans |
|
|
8,329 |
|
|
|
(317) |
(d) |
|
|
(651 |
) |
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
7,465 |
|
|
|
(295) |
(d) |
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity instruments(a) |
|
|
7,001 |
|
|
|
(214) |
(d) |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,927 |
|
|
|
(195) |
(d) |
All other |
|
|
4,931 |
|
|
|
(155) |
(g) |
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
5,672 |
|
|
|
(120) |
(g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
(1,328 |
) |
|
$ |
89 |
(d) |
|
$ |
(78 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,317 |
) |
|
$ |
90 |
(d) |
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
28 |
(d) |
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
1 |
(d) |
Trading liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments |
|
|
(870 |
) |
|
|
93 |
(d) |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
211 |
|
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
112 |
(d) |
Accounts
payable, accrued expense and other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial interests issued by
consolidated VIEs |
|
|
(8,151 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,532 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
(595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
(22,976 |
) |
|
|
2,883 |
(d) |
|
|
630 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(19,479 |
) |
|
|
2,209 |
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs |
|
|
gains and (losses) |
|
Three months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Total realized/ |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfers in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to financial |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
Fair value, |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
issuances |
|
|
and/or out of |
|
|
Fair value, |
|
|
instruments at |
|
(in millions) |
|
June 30, 2007 |
|
|
gains/(losses)(c) |
|
|
settlements, net |
|
|
level 3(c) |
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments |
|
$ |
10,951 |
|
|
$ |
(60 |
)(d)(e) |
|
$ |
2,020 |
|
|
$ |
2,319 |
|
|
$ |
15,230 |
|
|
$ |
(89 |
)(d)(e) |
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)(f) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)(f) |
Loans |
|
|
1,544 |
|
|
|
(81 |
)(d) |
|
|
4,368 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
6,119 |
|
|
|
(88 |
)(d) |
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity instruments(a) |
|
|
6,059 |
|
|
|
876 |
(d) |
|
|
(760 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,175 |
|
|
|
294 |
(d) |
All other |
|
|
2,141 |
|
|
|
(12 |
)(g) |
|
|
352 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
2,621 |
|
|
|
(6 |
)(g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
(926 |
) |
|
$ |
(31 |
)(d) |
|
$ |
(138 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,095 |
) |
|
$ |
(38 |
)(d) |
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76 |
)(d) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(128 |
)(d) |
Trading liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments |
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
148 |
(d) |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
(394 |
) |
|
|
(476 |
) |
|
|
120 |
(d) |
Net derivatives payables |
|
|
(1,677 |
) |
|
|
(729 |
)(d) |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
875 |
|
|
|
(1,370 |
) |
|
|
(166 |
)(d) |
Accounts
payable, accrued expense and other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(449 |
)(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(449 |
) |
|
|
(449 |
)(d) |
Beneficial interests issued by
consolidated VIEs |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
(20,307 |
) |
|
|
(512 |
)(d) |
|
|
(955 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(21,783 |
) |
|
|
(735 |
)(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs |
|
|
gains and (losses) |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Total realized/ |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfers in |
|
|
Fair value, |
|
|
related to financial |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
Fair value, |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
issuances |
|
|
and/or out of |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
instruments at |
|
(in millions) |
|
January 1, 2008 |
|
|
gains/(losses)(c) |
|
|
settlements, net |
|
|
level 3(c) |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments |
|
$ |
24,066 |
|
|
$ |
(7,500) |
(d)(e) |
|
$ |
8,427 |
|
|
$ |
21,389 |
|
|
$ |
46,382 |
|
|
$ |
(6,628) |
(d)(e) |
Net derivative receivables |
|
|
633 |
|
|
|
5,328 |
(d) |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
1,490 |
|
|
|
7,891 |
|
|
|
6,146 |
(d) |
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
(850) |
(f) |
|
|
1,982 |
|
|
|
9,420 |
|
|
|
10,653 |
|
|
|
(748) |
(f) |
Loans |
|
|
8,380 |
|
|
|
(638) |
(d) |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
(600 |
) |
|
|
7,465 |
|
|
|
(845) |
(d) |
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity instruments(a) |
|
|
6,763 |
|
|
|
448 |
(d) |
|
|
(284 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,927 |
|
|
|
(195) |
(d) |
All other |
|
|
3,160 |
|
|
|
(168) |
(g) |
|
|
2,659 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
5,672 |
|
|
|
(114) |
(g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
(1,161 |
) |
|
$ |
12 |
(d) |
|
$ |
(116 |
) |
|
$ |
(52 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,317 |
) |
|
$ |
10 |
(d) |
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(33) |
(d) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
(113 |
) |
|
|
38 |
(d) |
Trading liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments |
|
|
(480 |
) |
|
|
21 |
(d) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
(389 |
) |
|
|
271 |
(d) |
Accounts payable, accrued expense and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other liabilities |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
25 |
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial interests issued by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
consolidated VIEs |
|
|
(82 |
) |
|
|
24 |
(d) |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
(545 |
) |
|
|
(595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
(21,938 |
) |
|
|
2,846 |
(d) |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
(621 |
) |
|
|
(19,479 |
) |
|
|
2,496 |
(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized |
|
|
|
Fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs |
|
|
gains and (losses) |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
|
|
Total realized/ |
|
|
Purchases, |
|
|
Transfers in |
|
|
|
|
|
|
related to financial |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
Fair value, |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
issuances |
|
|
and/or out of |
|
|
Fair value, |
|
|
instruments at |
|
(in millions) |
|
January 1, 2007 |
|
|
gains/(losses)(c) |
|
|
settlements, net |
|
|
level 3(c) |
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments |
|
$ |
9,320 |
|
|
$ |
(233 |
)(d)(e) |
|
$ |
3,280 |
|
|
$ |
2,863 |
|
|
$ |
15,230 |
|
|
$ |
(420 |
)(d)(e) |
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
35 |
(f) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(93 |
) |
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(8 |
)(f) |
Loans |
|
|
643 |
|
|
|
(55 |
)(d) |
|
|
5,243 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
6,119 |
|
|
|
(68 |
)(d) |
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity instruments(a) |
|
|
5,493 |
|
|
|
3,310 |
(d) |
|
|
(2,611 |
) |
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
6,175 |
|
|
|
1,118 |
(d) |
All other |
|
|
1,591 |
|
|
|
59 |
(g) |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
471 |
|
|
|
2,621 |
|
|
|
(4 |
)(g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits |
|
$ |
(385 |
) |
|
$ |
(12 |
)(d) |
|
$ |
(551 |
) |
|
$ |
(147 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,095 |
) |
|
$ |
(10 |
)(d) |
Other borrowed funds |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(76 |
)(d) |
|
|
(33 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(109 |
) |
|
|
(128 |
)(d) |
Trading liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
96 |
(d) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
(583 |
) |
|
|
(476 |
) |
|
|
121 |
(d) |
Net derivative payables |
|
|
(2,800 |
) |
|
|
51 |
(d) |
|
|
(371 |
) |
|
|
1,750 |
|
|
|
(1,370 |
) |
|
|
614 |
(d) |
Accounts payable, accrued expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(449 |
)(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(449 |
) |
|
|
(449 |
)(d) |
Beneficial interests issued by |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
consolidated VIEs |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
6 |
(d) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
(11,386 |
) |
|
|
(1,205 |
)(d) |
|
|
(6,441 |
) |
|
|
(2,751 |
) |
|
|
(21,783 |
) |
|
|
(667 |
)(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Private equity instruments represent investments within the Corporate/Private Equity line of
business. Amounts for 2007 private equity instruments and all other have been revised to
reflect the current presentation. |
(b) |
|
Level 3 liabilities as a percentage of total Firm liabilities accounted for at fair value
were 20% and 17% at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(c) |
|
Beginning January 1, 2008, all transfers in and out of level 3 are assumed to occur at the
beginning of the reporting period. |
(d) |
|
Reported in principal transactions revenue. |
(e) |
|
Changes in fair value for Retail Financial Services mortgage loans originated with the intent
to sell are measured at fair value and reported in mortgage fees and related income. |
(f) |
|
Realized gains (losses) are reported in securities gains (losses). Unrealized gains (losses)
are reported in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). |
(g) |
|
Reported in other income. |
Note: |
|
Mortgage servicing rights (MSRs) are excluded from the above
table. For a rollforward of balance sheet amounts related to MSRs,
see Note 18 on page 136 of this Form 10-Q. |
102
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis
Certain assets, liabilities and unfunded lending-related commitments are measured at fair value on
a nonrecurring basis; that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis
but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances (for example, when there is
evidence of impairment). The following table presents the financial instruments carried on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets by caption and by level within the SFAS 157 valuation hierarchy (as
described above) as of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, for which a nonrecurring change
in fair value has been recorded during the reporting period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal models |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal models with |
|
|
with significant |
|
|
Total carrying |
|
|
|
Quoted market |
|
|
significant observable |
|
|
unobservable |
|
|
value in the |
|
|
|
prices in active |
|
|
market parameters |
|
|
market parameters |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
September 30, 2008 (in millions) |
|
markets (Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Balance Sheets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans(a) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,147 |
|
|
$ |
3,832 |
|
|
$ |
8,979 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
650 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
667 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
5,797 |
|
|
$ |
3,849 |
|
|
$ |
9,646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expense and other
liabilities(b) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
121 |
|
Total liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring
basis |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
43 |
|
|
$ |
121 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal models |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Internal models with |
|
|
with significant |
|
|
Total carrying |
|
|
|
Quoted market |
|
|
significant observable |
|
|
unobservable |
|
|
value in the |
|
|
|
prices in active |
|
|
market parameters |
|
|
market parameters |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
December 31, 2007 (in millions) |
|
markets (Level 1) |
|
|
(Level 2) |
|
|
(Level 3) |
|
|
Balance Sheets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans(a) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,818 |
|
|
$ |
16,196 |
|
|
$ |
19,014 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
267 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,085 |
|
|
$ |
16,322 |
|
|
$ |
19,407 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expense and other
liabilities(b) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
Total liabilities at fair value on a nonrecurring
basis |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes debt financing and other loan warehouses held-for-sale. |
(b) |
|
Represents the fair value adjustment associated with $1.2 billion and $3.2 billion of
unfunded held-for-sale lending-related commitments at
September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
Nonrecurring fair value changes
The following table presents the total change in value of financial instruments for which a fair
value adjustment has been included in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, related to financial instruments held at September 30,
2008 and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
(1,071 |
) |
|
$ |
(508 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,524 |
) |
|
$ |
(565 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
(134 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(225 |
) |
|
|
(135 |
) |
Accounts payable, accrued expense and other
liabilities |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(462 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total nonrecurring fair value gains (losses) |
|
$ |
(1,239 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,007 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,833 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,162 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the above table, loans principally include changes in fair value for loans carried on the
balance sheet at the lower of cost or fair value; and accounts payable, accrued expense and other
liabilities principally include the change in fair value for unfunded lending-related commitments
within the leveraged lending portfolio.
Level
3 analysis
Level 3 assets (including assets measured at the lower of cost or fair value) were 6% of total Firm
assets at September 30, 2008. The following describes significant changes to level 3 assets during
the period.
For the three months ended September 30, 2008
Level 3 assets increased $1.3 billion in the third quarter of
2008, largely as a result of $15.2 billion of transfers of
assets into level 3, principally AAA-rated collateralized loan
obligations (CLOs) backed by corporate loans for which liquidity decreased
and market activity was limited, and $5.8 billion of purchased mortgage servicing rights related to
the Washington Mutual transaction. These increases were largely offset by decreases in level 3
assets due to $12.3 billion of sales and markdowns of residential mortgage exposure and $3.5 billion of sales and markdowns of
leveraged loans and transfers of similar leveraged loans to level 2 due to the increased price transparency of such assets.
103
For the nine months
ended September 30, 2008
Level 3
assets increased $57.0 billion in the first nine months of 2008, predominantly due to the
following:
|
|
Acquisition of $41.5 billion of level 3 assets as a result of the merger with Bear Stearns. |
|
|
|
Purchase of approximately $4.4 billion of reverse mortgages in the first quarter of 2008,
for which there is limited pricing information and a lack of market liquidity. |
|
|
|
Transfer of
$9.8 billion of mortgage-related assets and $14.0 billion of AAA-rated CLOs backed by corporate loans into level 3 based upon a significant
reduction in new deal issuance and price transparency.
Mortgage-related assets include commercial mortgage-backed securities with a rating below AAA,
other noninvestment grade mortgage securities and certain prime
mortgages. |
Partially
offsetting the increases in level 3 assets described above were
approximately $14.3 billion of sales and markdowns of residential mortgage-backed
securities, prime residential mortgage loans and Alt-A residential mortgage loans. In addition, leveraged loans included
within level 3 assets declined $7.5 billion during the period as a result of sales and markdowns,
as well as transfers of similar leveraged loans to level 2 due to the increased price transparency
for such assets.
Gains and Losses
For the three months ended September 30, 2008
Gains and losses in the tables above include losses on trading debt equity instruments of
approximately $4.3 billion for the three months ended September 30, 2008, principally from
mortgage-related transactions. In addition, the Firm reported net gains of
approximately $2.5 billion related to derivative transactions
and gains of $2.9 billion related to structured notes, principally due to
significant volatility in the fixed income, commodities and equity
markets.
In
addition there were losses of approximately $860 million on leveraged loans. Leveraged loans
are typically classified as held-for-sale and measured at the lower of cost or fair value and
therefore included in the nonrecurring fair value assets.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008
Gains and losses in the tables above include losses on trading and debt and equity instruments of
approximately $7.5 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, principally from
mortgage-related transactions and auction-rate securities. In
addition, the Firm reported net gains of $5.3 billion related to derivative
transactions and gains of $2.8 billion related to structured notes,
principally due to significant volatility in the fixed income,
commodities and equity markets.
In
addition, there were losses of approximately $2.5 billion on leveraged loans. Leveraged loans
are typically classified as held-for-sale and measured at the lower of cost or fair value and
therefore included in the nonrecurring fair value assets.
The Firm risk manages level 3 financial instruments using securities and derivative positions
classified within level 1 or 2 of the valuation hierarchy; the effect of these risk management
activities are not reflected in the level 3 gains and losses included in the tables above.
For a discussion of changes in fair value of the MSR asset see Note 18 on page 136 of this
Form 10-Q.
104
Certain risk exposures that are carried at fair value
As noted above, over the past several quarters liquidity in certain sectors of the mortgage markets
has decreased thereby limiting the price transparency of certain mortgage-related instruments.
The table below summarizes the Firms mortgage-related exposures that are carried at fair value
through earnings or at the lower of cost or fair value; the table excludes securities held in the
available-for-sale portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exposure as of |
|
Exposure as of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
June 30, 2008 |
|
Net
gains/(losses)(d) |
|
|
Net
gains/(losses)(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of risk |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of risk |
|
|
reported in income- |
|
|
reported in income- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
management |
|
|
three months ended |
|
|
nine months ended |
|
(in millions) |
|
Gross |
|
|
activities(c) |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
activities(c) |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Residential
Mortgage:(a)(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime |
|
$ |
13,136 |
|
|
$ |
6,704 |
|
|
$ |
21,291 |
|
|
$ |
9,089 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alt-A |
|
|
5,159 |
|
|
|
5,151 |
|
|
|
8,360 |
|
|
|
8,360 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,295 |
|
|
|
11,855 |
|
|
|
29,651 |
|
|
|
17,449 |
|
|
$ |
(1,531 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,791 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subprime |
|
|
1,377 |
|
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
1,855 |
|
|
|
(79 |
) |
|
|
(133 |
) |
|
|
(370 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Residential |
|
|
2,239 |
|
|
|
1,200 |
|
|
|
3,017 |
|
|
|
3,017 |
|
|
|
(192 |
) |
|
|
(252 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Mortgage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities |
|
|
3,538 |
|
|
|
2,070 |
|
|
|
4,072 |
|
|
|
1,103 |
|
|
|
(149 |
) |
|
|
(508 |
) |
Loans |
|
|
4,836 |
|
|
|
3,478 |
|
|
|
6,749 |
|
|
|
5,012 |
|
|
|
(216 |
) |
|
|
(313 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included exposures in
Investment Bank and Retail Financial Services segments, and
Washington Mutual. |
(b) |
|
Excluded from the table
above are certain mortgage-related assets that are carried at fair
value and recorded in trading assets, such as: (i) U.S. government
agency and U.S. government-sponsored enterprise securities that are
liquid and of high credit quality of $47.7 billion and $32.0 billion at September 30, 2008,
and June 30, 2008, respectively; (ii) financing
transactions, that are collateralized by mortgage-related assets of
$8.5 billion and $9.5 billion at September 30, 2008, and
June 30, 2008, respectively, as the primary risk to the Firm is
counterparty (or borrower) risk and the Firm believes that such
transactions are well-collateralized; (iii) reverse mortgages of
$4.4 billion and $4.7 billion at September 30, 2008,
and June 30, 2008, respectively, for which the principal risk is
mortality risk; (iv) VIE assets of $391 million and
$7.0 billion at September 30, 2008, and June 30, 2008,
respectively, for which the Firm does not bear economic exposure as the Firm serves as an intermediary between two
parties and does not bear market risk; and (v) mortgage servicing
rights, which are reported in Note 18 on pages 135-137 of this
Form 10-Q. |
(c) |
|
The amounts presented reflect the effects of derivatives utilized to risk manage the gross
exposures arising from cash-based instruments and are presented on a bond or loan equivalent
(notional) basis. The Firm does not have any material gross mortgage-related exposure created
through derivatives. |
(d) |
|
Net gains and losses
include all revenue related to the positions (i.e., all interest income,
changes in fair value of the assets, changes in fair value of the related risk management
positions, and all interest expense related to the liabilities funding those positions). |
Residential mortgages
Prime Mortgage
The Firm had exposure of $13.1 billion to prime mortgages carried at fair value through earnings or
at the lower of cost or fair value at September 30, 2008, which
consisted of $4.5 billion of
securities (including $1.9 billion of forward purchase
commitments), predominantly rated AAA, and $8.6 billion of first lien
mortgages. Net exposure to
prime residential mortgages decreased 26% in the quarter, principally due to asset sales and, to a
lesser extent, declines in asset values.
Alt-A mortgage
The Firm had exposure of $5.2 billion to Alt-A mortgages carried at fair value through earnings or
at the lower of cost or fair value at September 30, 2008, which
consisted of $1.3 billion of securities, largely rated AAA, and
$3.9 billion of first lien mortgages. Net
exposure to Alt-A mortgages decreased 38% in the quarter, principally
due to asset sales and, to a lesser extent, declines in asset values.
Subprime mortgage
The Firm had exposure of $1.4 billion to subprime mortgages carried at fair value through earnings
or at the lower of cost or fair value at September 30, 2008,
which included $1.0 billion of securities, largely rated AAA,
and $363 million of first lien mortgages.
Classification and Valuation
Residential mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities are classified within level 2 or level 3
of the valuation hierarchy depending on the level of liquidity and activity in the markets for a
particular product. Level 3 assets include residential whole loans, prime and Alt-A securities
rated below AAA, subprime securities and single-name credit default swaps (CDS) on ABS. Products
that continue to have reliable price transparency evidenced by
consistent market transactions, such
as AAArated Prime and Alt-A securities as well as agency
securities, continue to be classified in
level 2.
For those products classified within level 2 of the valuation hierarchy, the Firm estimates the
value of such instruments using a combination of observed transaction prices, independent pricing
services and relevant broker quotes.
105
Consideration is given to the nature of the quotes (e.g., indicative or firm) and the relationship
of recently evidenced market activity to the prices provided from independent pricing services.
When relevant market activity is not occurring or is limited, the fair value of residential
mortgage loans is estimated by projecting the expected cash flows and discounting those cash flows
at a rate reflective of current market liquidity. To estimate the
projected cash flows (inclusive
of prepayment and default rates), specific consideration is given to
both borrower-specific and
other market factors including, but not limited to, the borrowers FICO score, the type of
collateral supporting the loan, an estimate of the current value of the collateral supporting the
loan, the level of documentation for the loan and market-derived expectations for home price
appreciation or depreciation in the respective geography of the borrower.
When relevant market activity is not occurring or is limited, the fair value of residential mortgage-backed
securities is estimated considering the value of the collateral (in
this case, the residential mortgage loans
from which the cash flows on the securities are derived) and the specific attributes of the
securities held by the Firm. The value of the collateral pool supporting the securities are
analyzed using the same techniques and factors described above for residential mortgage loans albeit in a more aggregated manner across the
pool. For example, average FICO scores, average delinquency rates, average loss severities and
prepayment rates, among other metrics, may be evaluated. In addition, as each securitization
vehicle distributes cash in a manner or order that is predetermined at the inception of the
vehicle, the order in which each particular mortgage-backed security is allocated, cash flows and
the level of credit enhancement in place to support those cash flows are key considerations in
deriving the value of the mortgage-backed securities. Finally, the risk premium that investors
demand for securitized products in todays market is factored into the valuation. To benchmark its
valuations, the Firm looks to transactions for similar instruments and utilizes independent pricing
provided by third-party vendors, broker quotes and relevant market indices such as the ABX index,
as applicable. While none of those sources are solely indicative of fair value, they serve as
directional indicators for the appropriateness of the Firms estimates.
Commercial mortgages
Commercial mortgages are loans to companies backed by commercial real estate. Commercial
mortgage-backed securities are securities collateralized by a pool of commercial mortgages.
Typically, commercial mortgages have lock-out periods, where the borrower is restricted from
prepaying the loan for a specified timeframe, or periods where there are disincentives for the
borrower to prepay the loan due to prepayment penalties. These features reduce prepayment risk for
commercial mortgages relative to that of residential mortgages.
The Firm had exposure to $8.3 billion of commercial mortgage-backed assets carried at fair value
through earnings or at the lower of cost or fair value at September 30, 2008, which consisted of
$3.5 billion of securities, largely rated AAA, and
$4.8 billion of first lien mortgages, largely in the U.S. Net
commercial mortgage exposure decreased 9% in the
quarter, principally due to asset sales and, to a lesser extent, declines in asset values.
Classification and Valuation
While commercial mortgages and commercial mortgage-backed securities are classified within level 2
or level 3 of the valuation hierarchy, depending on the level of liquidity and activity in the
markets, the majority of these mortgages, including both loans and lower-rated securities, are
currently classified in level 3. Level 2 assets include AAA-rated fixed-rate commercial
mortgage-backed securities.
For those products classified within level 2 of the valuation hierarchy, the Firm estimates the value of such instruments using a combination of observed transaction prices, independent pricing services and relevant broker quotes. Consideration is given to the nature of the quotes (e.g., indicative or firm) and the relationship of recently evidenced market activity to the prices provided from independent pricing services.
When relevant market activity is not present or is limited, the value of commercial mortgage loans
is estimated by projecting the expected cash flows and discounting those cash flows at a rate
reflective of current market liquidity. To estimate the projected cash flows, consideration is
given to both borrower-specific and other market factors including, but not limited to, the
borrowers debt-to-service coverage ratio, the type of commercial property (retail, office,
lodging, multi-family, etc.), an estimate of the current loan-to-value ratio and market-derived
expectations for property price appreciation or depreciation in the respective geographic location.
When relevant market activity is not present or is limited, the value of commercial mortgage-backed
securities is estimated considering the value of the collateral (in this case, the commercial
mortgage loans from which the cash flows on the securities are derived) and the specific attributes
of the securities held by the Firm. The value of the collateral pool supporting the securities are
analyzed using the same techniques and factors described above, for the valuation of commercial mortgage loans albeit in a more aggregated manner
across the pool. For example, average delinquencies, loan or geographic concentrations and average
debt-service coverage ratios, among other metrics, may be evaluated. In addition, as each
securitization vehicle distributes cash in a manner or order that is predetermined at the inception
of the vehicle, the order in which each particular mortgage-backed security is allocated, cash
flows and the level of credit enhancement in place to support those cash flows are key
considerations in deriving the value of the mortgage-backed securities. Finally, the risk premium
that investors demand for securitized products in todays market is factored into the valuation. To
benchmark its valuations, the Firm utilizes
106
independent pricing provided by third-party vendors, and broker quotes, as applicable. While none
of those sources are solely indicative of fair value, they serve as directional indicators for the
appropriateness of the Firms estimates.
The following table presents mortgage-related activities within the available-for-sale securities
portfolio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
included in other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gains/(losses) |
|
comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reported in income |
|
(pretax) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Nine months |
|
|
Three months |
|
|
Nine months |
|
|
|
|
Exposure as of |
|
|
Exposure as of |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
ended |
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. residential
mortgage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime |
|
$ |
6,683 |
|
|
$ |
4,867 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(348 |
) |
|
$ |
(495 |
) |
Alt-A |
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
(75 |
) |
Subprime |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(41 |
) |
|
|
(43 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S.
residential |
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
803 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
mortgage |
|
|
4,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S.
government and federal agency obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities |
|
$ |
9,157 |
|
|
$ |
3,821 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
Collateralized
mortgage
obligations |
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
636 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
U.S.
government-sponsored enterprise obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities |
|
|
83,858 |
|
|
|
75,144 |
|
|
|
403 |
|
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(848 |
) |
Direct obligations |
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exposures in the table above include $107.2 billion of mortgage-backed securities classified as
available-for-sale in the Firms Consolidated Balance Sheets at
September 30, 2008.
These investments are used as part of the Firms centralized risk
management of structural interest rate risk (the sensitivity of the
Firm's aggregate balance sheet to changes in interest rates). Changes in the Firms structural
interest rate position, as well as changes in the overall interest rate environment, are
continually monitored resulting in periodic repositioning of this portfolio. Given that this
portfolio is primarily used to manage interest rate risk, predominantly all of these securities are
backed by either U.S. government agencies, government sponsored
entities, or are rated AAA.
Investment
securities in the available-for-sale portfolio include:
|
|
$7.4 billion of prime and Alt-A securities, principally rated AAA. The fair value of these
securities is determined based on independent pricing services supported by relevant and
observable market data for similar securities. The Firm classifies these securities in level 2
of the valuation hierarchy. |
|
|
|
$4.6 billion of
commercial mortgage-backed securities, principally rated AAA. The fair value of these securities is
determined using a third party pricing service that uses relevant and observable market data.
The Firm classifies these securities in level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. |
|
|
|
$94.1 billion of U.S.
government agencies or U.S. government-sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed securities. Where
these securities trade in active markets and there is market-observable pricing they are
classified in level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Where the determination of fair value is
based on broker quotes and independent pricing services, supported by relevant and observable
market data, the Firm classifies such securities in level 2 of the valuation hierarchy. |
Credit adjustments
When determining the fair value of an instrument it may be necessary to record a valuation
adjustment to arrive at an exit price in accordance with SFAS 157. Valuation adjustments include, but
are not limited to, amounts to reflect counterparty credit quality and the Firms own
creditworthiness. See also Note 4 on page 111 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report for a
discussion of the valuation adjustments the Firm may take to arrive at a fair value measurement.
107
Credit
Valuation Adjustment (CVA)
The fair value of the Firms derivative receivables incorporates an adjustment, the CVA, to reflect the credit
quality of counterparties. These adjustments are necessary when the market price or market
parameter is not indicative of the credit quality of the counterparty. As few classes of derivative
contracts are listed on an exchange, the majority of derivative positions are valued using
internally developed models that use as their basis observable market parameters. Market practice
is to quote market parameters equivalent to an AA credit rating; thus, all counterparties are
assumed to have the same credit quality. Therefore, an adjustment to the valuation arrived at using
such observable parameters is necessary in order to reflect the actual credit quality of each
derivative counterparty when calculating the fair value of the instrument. The adjustment also
takes into account contractual factors designed to reduce the Firms credit exposure to each
counterparty, such as collateral and legal rights of offset.
Debit
Valuation Adjustment (DVA)
Beginning on January 1, 2007, the Firm began factoring an estimate of its own creditworthiness
(i.e., DVA) into the valuation of financial liabilities that are carried at
fair value in accordance with SFAS 157. The methodology to determine the adjustment is consistent
with CVA and incorporates JPMorgan Chases credit spread as observed in the credit default swap
market. The markets view of the credit quality of the Firm, as reflected in quoted spreads in the
credit default swap market, is driven by a number of factors, including the quality and performance
of the assets held by the Firm. The liabilities carried at fair value and for which a DVA
adjustment is taken include derivative contracts and structured notes.
On January 1, 2007, the Firm elected under SFAS 159 to record at fair value all structured notes
not previously elected or eligible for election under SFAS 155. As a result, all structured notes
are measured on a fair value basis. For further information on these elections, see Note 4 on pages
109111 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report. Structured notes are debt instruments with
embedded derivatives that are tailored to meet a client need for derivative risk in a funded form.
The derivative is the primary driver of the risk and as such the valuation of structured notes is
similar to that of a derivative and includes a DVA to reflect the credit quality of the Firm.
The following table provides the credit adjustments (both CVA and DVA) as reflected within the
Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Firm as of the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives receivables balance |
|
$ |
118,648 |
|
|
$ |
77,136 |
|
Derivatives CVA |
|
|
(4,354 |
) |
|
|
(1,265 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives payables balance |
|
|
85,816 |
|
|
|
68,705 |
|
Derivatives DVA |
|
|
1,468 |
|
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Structured notes balance |
|
|
79,908 |
|
|
|
87,622 |
|
Structured
notes DVA(a) |
|
|
3,135 |
|
|
|
896 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Structured notes are recorded within long-term debt, other borrowed funds and deposits on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets based upon the tenor and legal form of the note. |
The following table provides the impact of credit adjustments (CVA and DVA) on earnings in the
respective periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives CVA |
|
$ |
(1,266 |
) |
|
$ |
(208 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,349 |
) |
|
$ |
(294 |
) |
Derivatives DVA |
|
|
229 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
366 |
|
Structured
notes DVA(a) |
|
|
727 |
|
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
1,933 |
|
|
|
589 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Structured notes are carried at fair value based upon the Firms election under SFAS 159 and
are recorded within long-term debt, other borrowed funds and deposits on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. |
As noted above, the markets view of the Firms credit quality is reflected in credit spreads
observed in the credit default swap market. These credit spreads are affected by a number of
factors such as the performance of the assets the Firm holds. Consequently, significant
deterioration in the value of sizable exposures held by the Firm, are likely to result in wider
credit default swap spreads. This will lead to an increase in the Firms credit adjustment (i.e.,
DVA) for liabilities
108
carried at fair value. Two examples of sizable exposures that have experienced a significant
deterioration in value are leveraged loans and mortgages carried at fair value. The impact on the
value of these assets for three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008, was $3.6 billion and $7.5
billion, respectively.
NOTE 4 FAIR VALUE OPTION
SFAS 159 provides an option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected
financial assets, financial liabilities, unrecognized firm commitments, and written loan
commitments not previously carried at fair value. The Firms fair value elections were intended to
mitigate the volatility in earnings that had been created by recording financial instruments and
the related risk management instruments on a different basis of accounting or to eliminate the
operational complexities of applying hedge accounting.
For a discussion of the primary financial instruments for which fair value elections were made and
the basis for those elections, see Note 5 on pages 119121 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
2008 Elections
During 2008, the following elections were made:
|
|
As part of the Bear Stearns merger, the Firm acquired instrument types that were similar to
the existing fair value elections made by the Firm, thus the Firm formally elected the fair
value option for these instruments, primarily loans, as of the merger date. |
|
|
|
In the second quarter, the Firm began electing the fair value option for newly transacted
securities borrowed and securities lending agreements with a maturity greater than one year.
An election was not made for any short-term agreements as the carrying value for such
agreements generally approximates fair value. |
|
|
|
In the third quarter of 2008, the Firm elected the fair value option for both the
asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP) investments
purchased under the Federal Reserves Asset-Backed Commercial Paper Money Market Mutual Fund Liquidity Facility (AML Facility) for
U.S. money market mutual funds, and the related nonrecourse advance from the Federal Reserve
Bank of Boston (FRBB). At September 30, 2008, ABCP investments of $61.3 billion were
recorded in other assets; the corresponding nonrecourse liability to the FRBB in the same
amount was recorded in other borrowed funds. For further discussion, see Note 20 on page 138
of this Form 10-Q. |
|
|
|
As part of the Washington Mutual transaction, the Firm elected the fair value option for
prime mortgages previously designated as held-for-sale by Washington
Mutual and for certain tax credit investments acquired. |
Changes in value under the fair value option election
The following tables present the changes in fair value included in the Consolidated Statements of
Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, for items for which the
fair value election was made. The profit and loss information presented below only includes the
financial instruments that were elected to be measured at fair value; related risk management
instruments, which are required to be measured at fair value, are not included in the table.
109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total changes |
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
in fair value |
|
Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
in fair value |
(in millions) |
|
transactions(c) |
|
Other income |
|
recorded |
|
transactions(c) |
|
Other income |
|
recorded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under
resale agreements |
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(28 |
) |
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
240 |
|
Securities borrowed |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments, excluding loans |
|
|
(354 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(354 |
) |
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
(11 |
)(d) |
|
|
180 |
|
Loans reported as trading assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk |
|
|
(2,946 |
) |
|
|
(78) |
(d) |
|
|
(3,024 |
) |
|
|
(724 |
) |
|
|
(103 |
)(d) |
|
|
(827 |
) |
Other changes in fair value |
|
|
(350 |
) |
|
|
306 |
(d) |
|
|
(44 |
) |
|
|
131 |
|
|
|
418 |
(d) |
|
|
549 |
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk |
|
|
(457 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(457 |
) |
|
|
(100 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(100 |
) |
Other changes in fair value |
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(39 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(88) |
(e) |
|
|
(88 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40 |
)(e) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits(a) |
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
264 |
|
|
|
(522 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(522 |
) |
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or
sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(48 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(48 |
) |
Other borrowed funds(a) |
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
783 |
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(159 |
) |
Trading liabilities |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expense and
other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(449 |
) |
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs |
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
337 |
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(115 |
) |
Long-term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk(a) |
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
714 |
|
|
|
429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
429 |
|
Other
changes in fair value(b) |
|
|
10,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,945 |
|
|
|
(1,065 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,065 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 |
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total changes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total changes |
Nine months ended September 30, |
|
Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
in fair value |
|
Principal |
|
|
|
|
|
in fair value |
(in millions) |
|
transactions(c) |
|
Other income |
|
recorded |
|
transactions(c) |
|
Other income |
|
recorded |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under
resale agreements |
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
|
$ |
240 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
240 |
|
Securities borrowed |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments, excluding loans |
|
|
(230 |
) |
|
|
15 |
(d) |
|
|
(215 |
) |
|
|
467 |
|
|
|
4 |
(d) |
|
|
471 |
|
Loans reported as trading assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk |
|
|
(4,629 |
) |
|
|
(128) |
(d) |
|
|
(4,757 |
) |
|
|
(150 |
) |
|
|
(104 |
)(d) |
|
|
(254 |
) |
Other changes in fair value |
|
|
(275 |
) |
|
|
715 |
(d) |
|
|
440 |
|
|
|
147 |
|
|
|
601 |
(d) |
|
|
748 |
|
Loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk |
|
|
(957 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(957 |
) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(91 |
) |
Other changes in fair value |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(129) |
(e) |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
(e) |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits(a) |
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(105 |
) |
|
|
(562 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(562 |
) |
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or
sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
Other borrowed funds(a) |
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
(317 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(317 |
) |
Trading liabilities |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
Accounts payable, accrued expense and
other liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(449 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(449 |
) |
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs |
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
368 |
|
|
|
(184 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(184 |
) |
Long-term debt: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk(a) |
|
|
1,892 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,892 |
|
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
562 |
|
Other
changes in fair value(b) |
|
|
10,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,505 |
|
|
|
(2,313 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,313 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Total changes in instrument-specific credit risk related to structured notes were $727
million and $454 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively,
and $1.9 billion and $589 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007,
respectively, which includes adjustments for structured notes classified within deposits and
other borrowed funds as well as long-term debt. |
(b) |
|
Structured notes are debt instruments with embedded derivatives that are tailored to meet a
client need for derivative risk in funded form. The embedded derivative is the primary driver
of risk. The 2008 gain included in Other changes in fair value results from a significant decline
in the value of certain structured notes where the embedded derivative is principally linked
to either equity indices or commodity prices, both of which declined
sharply during the third quarter of 2008.
Although the risk associated with the structured notes is actively managed, the gains reported
in this table do not include the income statement impact of such risk management instruments. |
(c) |
|
Included in the amounts are gains and losses related to certain financial instruments
previously carried at fair value by the Firm, such as structured liabilities elected pursuant
to SFAS 155 and loans purchased as part of the Investment Banks trading activities. |
(d) |
|
Reported in mortgage fees and related income. |
(e) |
|
Reported in other income. |
110
Determination of instrument-specific credit risk for items for which a fair value election was
made
The following describes how the gains and losses included in earnings during the quarters ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007, which were attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit risk,
were determined.
|
|
Loans and lending-related commitments: For floating-rate instruments, changes in value are
all attributed to instrument-specific credit risk. For fixed-rate instruments, an allocation
of the changes in value for the period is made between those changes in value that are
interest rate-related and changes in value that are credit-related. Allocations are generally
based upon an analysis of borrower-specific credit spread and recovery information, where
available, or benchmarking to similar entities or industries. |
|
|
|
Long-term debt: Changes in value attributable to instrument-specific credit risk were
derived principally from observable changes in the Firms credit spread. The gain for 2008 and
2007 was attributable to the widening of the Firms credit spread. |
|
|
|
Resale and repurchase agreements, securities borrowed agreements and securities lending
agreements: Generally, for these types of agreements, there is a requirement that collateral
be maintained with a market value equal to or in excess of the principal amount loaned; as a
result, there would be no adjustment or an immaterial adjustment for instrument-specific
credit related to these agreements. |
Difference between aggregate fair value and aggregate remaining contractual principal balance
outstanding
The following table reflects the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate
remaining contractual principal balance outstanding as of September 30, 2008, and December 31,
2007, for loans and long-term debt for which the SFAS 159 fair value option has been elected. The
loans were classified in trading assets debt and equity instruments or in loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value over |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value over |
|
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(under) remaining |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(under) remaining |
|
|
|
aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
aggregate |
|
|
aggregate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
aggregate |
|
|
|
contractual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
contractual |
|
|
contractual |
|
|
|
|
|
|
contractual |
|
|
|
principal amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
principal amount |
|
|
principal amount |
|
|
|
|
|
|
principal amount |
|
(in millions) |
|
outstanding |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing loans 90 days or more past due |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans reported as trading assets |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans reported as trading assets |
|
|
4,673 |
|
|
|
1,724 |
|
|
|
(2,949 |
) |
|
|
3,044 |
|
|
|
1,176 |
|
|
|
(1,868 |
) |
Loans |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
|
4,713 |
|
|
|
1,739 |
|
|
|
(2,974 |
) |
|
|
3,070 |
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
(1,878 |
) |
All other performing loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans reported as trading assets |
|
|
50,007 |
|
|
|
41,415 |
|
|
|
(8,592 |
) |
|
|
56,164 |
|
|
|
56,638 |
|
|
|
474 |
|
Loans |
|
|
11,114 |
|
|
|
9,171 |
|
|
|
(1,943 |
) |
|
|
9,011 |
|
|
|
8,580 |
|
|
|
(431 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
|
$ |
65,834 |
|
|
$ |
52,325 |
|
|
$ |
(13,509 |
) |
|
$ |
68,245 |
|
|
$ |
66,410 |
|
|
$ |
(1,835 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal protected debt |
|
$ |
(33,293 |
) |
(b) |
$ |
(30,236 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,057 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,262 |
) |
|
$ |
(24,033 |
) |
|
$ |
(229 |
) |
Nonprincipal protected debt(a) |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
(37,714 |
) |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
(46,423 |
) |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt |
|
|
NA |
|
|
$ |
(67,950 |
) |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
$ |
(70,456 |
) |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIN 46R long-term beneficial interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal protected debt |
|
$ |
(595 |
) |
|
$ |
(595 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Nonprincipal protected debt(a) |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
(2,722 |
) |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
(2,946 |
) |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total FIN 46R long-term beneficial
interests |
|
|
NA |
|
|
$ |
(3,317 |
) |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
$ |
(3,004 |
) |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Remaining contractual principal is not applicable to nonprincipal protected notes. Unlike
principal protected notes for which the Firm is obligated to return a stated amount of
principal at the maturity of the note, nonprincipal protected notes do not obligate the Firm
to return a stated amount of principal at maturity but to return an amount based upon the
performance of an underlying variable or derivative feature embedded in the note. |
(b) |
|
Where the Firm issues principal protected zero coupon or discount notes, the balance reflected as the remaining contractual principal is the final principal payment at maturity.
|
The contractual amount of unfunded lending-related commitments for which the fair value option
was elected was negligible at September 30, 2008. At December 31, 2007, the contractual amount of
unfunded lending-related commitments for which the fair value option was elected was $1.0 billion
with a corresponding fair value of $25 million. Such commitments are reflected as liabilities and
included in accounts payable, accrued expense and other liabilities.
NOTE 5 PRINCIPAL TRANSACTIONS
Principal transactions revenue consists of realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading
activities (including physical commodities inventories that are accounted for at the lower of cost
or fair value), changes in fair value associated with financial instruments held by the Investment
Bank (IB) for which the SFAS 159 fair value option was
111
elected, and loans held-for-sale within the wholesale lines of business. Principal transactions
revenue also includes private equity gains and losses.
The following table presents principal transactions revenue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading revenue |
|
$ |
(2,587 |
) |
|
$ |
(135 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,052 |
) |
|
$ |
5,281 |
|
Private equity gains(a) |
|
|
(176 |
) |
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
3,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total principal transactions revenue |
|
$ |
(2,763 |
) |
|
$ |
650 |
|
|
$ |
(2,814 |
) |
|
$ |
8,850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes revenue on private equity investments held in the Private Equity business within
Corporate/Private Equity and those held in other business segments. |
Trading assets and liabilities
Trading assets include debt and equity instruments held for trading purposes that JPMorgan Chase
owns (long positions), certain loans for which the Firm manages on a fair value basis and has
elected the SFAS 159 fair value option, and physical commodities inventories that are accounted
for at the lower of cost or fair value. Trading liabilities include debt and equity instruments
that the Firm has sold to other parties but does not own (short positions). The Firm is
obligated to purchase instruments at a future date to cover the short positions. Included in
trading assets and trading liabilities are the reported receivables (unrealized gains) and
payables (unrealized losses) related to derivatives. Trading positions are carried at fair value
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For a discussion of the valuation of trading assets and
trading liabilities, see Note 4 on pages 111118 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
The following table presents the fair value of trading assets and trading liabilities for the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments:(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and federal agency obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. treasuries |
|
$ |
33,816 |
|
|
$ |
32,378 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
5,642 |
|
|
|
791 |
|
Agency obligations |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
2,264 |
|
U.S. government-sponsored enterprise obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
42,040 |
|
|
|
33,910 |
|
Direct obligations |
|
|
11,739 |
|
|
|
9,928 |
|
Obligations of state and political subdivisions |
|
|
17,444 |
|
|
|
13,090 |
|
Certificates of deposit, bankers acceptances and commercial paper |
|
|
8,086 |
|
|
|
8,252 |
|
Debt securities issued by non-U.S. governments |
|
|
47,959 |
|
|
|
67,921 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
60,882 |
|
|
|
53,941 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
98,710 |
|
|
|
93,248 |
|
Loans |
|
|
43,139 |
|
|
|
57,814 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime |
|
|
2,668 |
|
|
|
6,136 |
|
Alt-A |
|
|
1,281 |
|
|
|
3,572 |
|
Subprime |
|
|
1,034 |
|
|
|
1,459 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
3,439 |
|
|
|
8,256 |
|
Non-U.S. residential |
|
|
898 |
|
|
|
974 |
|
Asset-backed securities |
|
|
11,388 |
|
|
|
9,675 |
|
Physical commodities |
|
|
5,044 |
|
|
|
4,490 |
|
Other |
|
|
6,211 |
|
|
|
6,174 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt and equity instruments |
|
|
401,609 |
|
|
|
414,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative receivables:(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
38,281 |
|
|
|
36,020 |
|
Credit |
|
|
28,446 |
|
|
|
22,083 |
|
Commodity |
|
|
14,268 |
|
|
|
9,419 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
19,264 |
|
|
|
5,616 |
|
Equity |
|
|
18,389 |
|
|
|
3,998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative receivables |
|
|
118,648 |
|
|
|
77,136 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading assets |
|
|
520,257 |
|
|
|
491,409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equity instruments(c) |
|
|
76,213 |
|
|
|
89,162 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative payables:(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate |
|
|
19,225 |
|
|
|
25,542 |
|
Credit |
|
|
19,417 |
|
|
|
11,613 |
|
Commodity |
|
|
11,441 |
|
|
|
6,942 |
|
Foreign exchange |
|
|
13,946 |
|
|
|
7,552 |
|
Equity |
|
|
21,787 |
|
|
|
17,056 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total derivative payables |
|
|
85,816 |
|
|
|
68,705 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total trading liabilities |
|
$ |
162,029 |
|
|
$ |
157,867 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Prior periods have been revised to reflect the current presentation. |
(b) |
|
Included in trading assets and trading liabilities are the reported receivables (unrealized
gains) and payables (unrealized losses) related to derivatives. As permitted under FIN 39, the
Firm has elected to net derivative receivables and derivative payables and the related cash
collateral received and paid when a legally enforceable master netting agreement exists. The
netted amount of cash collateral received and paid was $55.3 billion and $43.5 billion,
respectively, at September 30, 2008, and $34.9 billion and $24.6 billion, respectively, at
December 31, 2007. The Firm received and paid excess collateral of $22.3 billion and $7.5 billion, respectively, at September 30, 2008, and $17.4 billion and $2.4 billion,
respectively, at December 31, 2007. This additional collateral received and paid secures
potential exposure that could arise in the derivatives portfolio should the mark-to-market of
the transactions move in the Firms favor or the clients favor, respectively, and is not
nettable against the derivative receivables or payables in the table above. |
(c) |
|
Primarily represents securities sold, not yet purchased. |
Average trading assets and liabilities were as follows for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets debt and equity instruments |
|
$ |
391,060 |
|
|
$ |
396,622 |
|
|
$ |
398,119 |
|
|
$ |
374,603 |
|
Trading assets derivative receivables |
|
|
111,214 |
|
|
|
64,821 |
|
|
|
104,816 |
|
|
|
61,801 |
|
|
Trading liabilities debt and equity instruments(a) |
|
$ |
87,516 |
|
|
$ |
96,439 |
|
|
$ |
86,317 |
|
|
$ |
96,806 |
|
Trading liabilities derivative payables |
|
|
83,805 |
|
|
|
65,467 |
|
|
|
81,568 |
|
|
|
61,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Primarily represent securities sold, not yet purchased. |
Private equity
Private equity investments are recorded in other assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The
following table presents the carrying value and cost of the private equity investment portfolio
held by the Private Equity business within Corporate/Private Equity for the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
(in millions) |
|
Carrying value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Carrying value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total private equity
investments |
|
$ |
7,527 |
|
|
$ |
7,884 |
|
|
$ |
7,153 |
|
|
$ |
6,231 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Private equity includes investments in buyouts, growth equity and venture opportunities. These
investments are accounted for under investment company guidelines. Accordingly, these investments,
irrespective of the percentage of equity ownership interest held, are carried on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets at fair value. Realized and unrealized gains and losses arising from changes in
value are reported in principal transactions revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income in
the period that the gains or losses occur. For a discussion of the valuation of private equity
investments, see Note 4 on pages 111118 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
NOTE 6 OTHER NONINTEREST REVENUE
For a discussion of the components of, and the accounting policies for, the Firms other
noninterest revenue, see Note 7 on page 123 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
The following table presents the components of investment banking fees.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underwriting: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity |
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
$ |
267 |
|
|
$ |
1,146 |
|
|
$ |
1,169 |
|
Debt |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
475 |
|
|
|
1,602 |
|
|
|
2,178 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total underwriting |
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
742 |
|
|
|
2,748 |
|
|
|
3,347 |
|
Advisory |
|
|
556 |
|
|
|
594 |
|
|
|
1,396 |
|
|
|
1,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment banking fees |
|
$ |
1,316 |
|
|
$ |
1,336 |
|
|
$ |
4,144 |
|
|
$ |
4,973 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
113
The following table presents components of asset management, administration and commissions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset management: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment management fees |
|
$ |
1,458 |
|
|
$ |
1,935 |
|
|
$ |
4,332 |
|
|
$ |
4,576 |
|
All other asset management fees |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset management fees |
|
|
1,519 |
|
|
|
2,023 |
|
|
|
4,683 |
|
|
|
5,049 |
|
Total administration fees(a) |
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
353 |
|
|
|
1,887 |
|
|
|
1,755 |
|
Commissions and other fees: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Brokerage commissions |
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
715 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
1,974 |
|
All other commissions and fees |
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
572 |
|
|
|
1,739 |
|
|
|
1,682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commissions and other fees |
|
|
1,439 |
|
|
|
1,287 |
|
|
|
4,139 |
|
|
|
3,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total asset management, administration
and commissions |
|
$ |
3,485 |
|
|
$ |
3,663 |
|
|
$ |
10,709 |
|
|
$ |
10,460 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes fees for custody, securities lending, funds services and broker-dealer clearance. |
NOTE 7 INTEREST INCOME AND INTEREST EXPENSE
Details of interest income and interest expense were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans |
|
$ |
8,450 |
|
|
$ |
9,375 |
|
|
$ |
26,165 |
|
|
$ |
26,911 |
|
Securities |
|
|
1,522 |
|
|
|
1,332 |
|
|
|
4,099 |
|
|
|
3,965 |
|
Trading assets |
|
|
4,469 |
|
|
|
4,720 |
|
|
|
13,125 |
|
|
|
12,557 |
|
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale
agreements |
|
|
1,558 |
|
|
|
1,629 |
|
|
|
4,498 |
|
|
|
4,936 |
|
Securities borrowed |
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
2,013 |
|
|
|
3,498 |
|
Deposits with banks |
|
|
316 |
|
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
1,025 |
|
|
|
901 |
|
Other assets(b) |
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income |
|
|
17,326 |
|
|
|
18,806 |
|
|
|
51,387 |
|
|
|
52,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
|
3,351 |
|
|
|
5,638 |
|
|
|
11,551 |
|
|
|
15,975 |
|
Other borrowings |
|
|
2,563 |
|
|
|
4,301 |
|
|
|
8,410 |
|
|
|
12,463 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
2,176 |
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
|
5,942 |
|
|
|
4,722 |
|
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs |
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
Other liabilities(c) |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest expense |
|
|
8,332 |
|
|
|
11,893 |
|
|
|
26,440 |
|
|
|
33,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income |
|
|
8,994 |
|
|
|
6,913 |
|
|
|
24,947 |
|
|
|
19,183 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
3,811 |
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
|
|
11,690 |
|
|
|
4,322 |
|
Provision for credit losses accounting conformity(d) |
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income after provision for credit losses |
|
$ |
3,207 |
|
|
$ |
5,128 |
|
|
$ |
11,281 |
|
|
$ |
14,861 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Interest income and interest expense include the current-period interest accruals for
financial instruments measured at fair value except for financial instruments containing
embedded derivatives that would be separately accounted for in accordance with SFAS 133 absent
the SFAS 159 fair value election; for those instruments, all changes in value, including any
interest elements, are reported in principal transactions revenue. |
(b) |
|
Predominantly margin loans. |
(c) |
|
Includes brokerage customer payables. |
(d) |
|
The third quarter of 2008 included an accounting conformity loan loss reserve provision
related to the acquisition of Washington Mutuals banking operations. |
114
NOTE 8 PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
For a discussion of JPMorgan Chases pension and other postretirement employee benefit (OPEB)
plans, see Note 9 on pages 124130 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
The following table presents the components of net periodic benefit cost reported in the
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Firms U.S. and non-U.S. defined benefit pension and OPEB
plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit pension plans |
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
Non-U.S. |
|
OPEB plans |
Three months ended September 30, (in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits earned during the year |
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
$ |
68 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
Interest cost on benefit obligations |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(179 |
) |
|
|
(178 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Other defined benefit pension plans(a) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total defined benefit plans |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
Total defined contribution plans |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pension and OPEB cost included in compensation expense |
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
(9 |
) |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Defined benefit pension plans |
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
Non-U.S. |
|
OPEB plans |
Nine months ended September 30, (in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits earned during the year |
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
$ |
198 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
Interest cost on benefit obligations |
|
|
366 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
Expected return on plan assets |
|
|
(539 |
) |
|
|
(534 |
) |
|
|
(120 |
) |
|
|
(112 |
) |
|
|
(73 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
Amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
|
Prior service cost (credit) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
Settlement loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Other defined benefit pension plans(a) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total defined benefit plans |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
Total defined contribution plans |
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
|
|
158 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total pension and OPEB cost included in compensation expense |
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
209 |
|
|
$ |
278 |
|
|
$ |
246 |
|
|
$ |
(26 |
) |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes various defined benefit pension plans, which are individually immaterial. |
The fair value of plan assets for the U.S. defined benefit pension and OPEB plans and material
non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans was $9.3 billion and $2.5 billion, respectively, as of
September 30, 2008, and $11.4 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2007. See
Note 25 on pages 143144 of this Form 10-Q for further information on unrecognized amounts (i.e.,
net loss and prior service costs (credit)) reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income for
the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
There will be no 2008 contributions to the U.S. qualified defined benefit pension plan. The 2008
potential contributions for U.S. non-qualified defined benefit pension plans are $39 million. The
2008 potential contributions for non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans are $33 million and for
OPEB plans are $3 million.
115
NOTE 9 EMPLOYEE STOCK-BASED INCENTIVES
For a discussion of the accounting policies and other information relating to employee stock-based
compensation, see Note 10 on pages 131133 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
The Firm recognized noncash compensation expense related to its various employee stock-based
incentive plans of $697 million and $490 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and
2007, respectively, and $2.1 billion and $1.5 billion in the first nine months of 2008 and 2007,
respectively, in its Consolidated Statements of Income. These amounts included an accrual for the
estimated cost of stock awards to be granted to full career eligible employees of $159 million and
$123 million for the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $433 million and
$380 million for the first nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
In the first quarter of 2008, the Firm granted 64 million restricted stock units (RSUs) to JPMorgan Chase employees with a
grant date fair value of $39.83 per RSU in connection with its annual incentive grant.
In connection with the Bear Stearns merger, 46 million Bear Stearns employee stock awards,
principally RSUs, capital appreciation plan units and stock options,
were exchanged for equivalent JPMorgan Chase awards using the merger exchange ratio of 0.21753. The
fair value of these employee stock awards was included in the purchase price since substantially
all of the awards were fully vested immediately after the merger date under provisions that
provided for accelerated vesting upon a change of control of Bear Stearns. However, Bear Stearns
vested employee stock options had no impact on the purchase price; since the employee stock options
were significantly out of the money at the merger date, the fair value of these awards was equal to
zero upon their conversion into JPMorgan Chase options.
The Firm also exchanged 6 million shares of its common stock for 27 million shares of Bear Stearns
common stock held in an irrevocable grantor trust (the RSU Trust) using the merger exchange ratio
of 0.21753. The RSU Trust was established to hold common stock underlying awards granted to
selected employees and key executives under certain Bear Stearns employee stock plans. The RSU
Trust was consolidated on JPMorgan Chases Consolidated Balance
Sheets as of June 30, 2008, and the
shares held in the RSU Trust were recorded in Shares held in RSU Trust, which reduced
stockholders equity, similar to the treatment for treasury stock. A related obligation to issue
stock under these employee stock plans is reported in capital surplus. The issuance of shares held
in the RSU Trust to employees will not have any effect on the Firms total stockholders equity,
net income or earnings per share.
In June 2008, the Firm granted 19 million RSUs with a grant date fair value of $42.22 per RSU to
retain certain Bear Stearns employees. Substantially all of these awards were granted with the same
terms and conditions as described in Note 10 on page 131 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
116
NOTE 10 NONINTEREST EXPENSE
Merger costs
Costs associated with the Bear Stearns merger in 2008, costs associated with the 2004 merger with
Bank One Corporation, and costs associated with The Bank of New York, Inc. transaction (The Bank
of New York) are reflected in the merger costs caption of the Consolidated Statements of Income.
Costs related to the Washington Mutual transaction for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008 were not material.
For a further discussion of the Bear Stearns merger, see Note 2 on pages 9598 of this Form 10-Q.
A summary of merger-related costs is shown in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30,(a) |
|
Nine months ended September 30,(a) |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense category |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation |
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Occupancy |
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
Technology and communications and other |
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
149 |
|
The Bank of New York |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(b) |
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The 2008 activity reflects the Bear Stearns merger, and 2007 activity reflects the
2004 merger with Bank One Corporation and the transaction with The Bank of New York. Costs
related to the Washington Mutual transaction for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008, were not material. |
(b) |
|
With the exception of occupancy-related write-offs, all of the costs in the table require
the expenditure of cash. |
The table below shows the change in the merger reserve balance related to the costs
associated with the mergers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
September 30,(a) |
|
September 30,(a) |
|
|
Bear |
|
|
Washington |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bear |
|
|
Washington |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stearns |
|
|
Mutual |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stearns |
|
|
Mutual |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger reserve balance,
beginning of period |
|
$ |
1,093 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,093 |
|
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
155 |
|
Recorded as merger costs |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
Included in
net assets acquired |
|
|
|
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,112 |
|
|
|
363 |
|
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
Utilization of merger
reserve |
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(592 |
) |
|
|
(65 |
) |
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(766 |
) |
|
|
(196 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Merger reserve balance,
end of period |
|
$ |
597 |
|
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
$ |
960 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
(b) |
|
$ |
597 |
|
|
$ |
363 |
|
|
$ |
960 |
|
|
$ |
127 |
(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The 2007 activity reflects the 2004 merger with Bank One Corporation. |
(b) |
|
Excludes $23 million related to the Bank of New York transaction. |
NOTE 11 SECURITIES
For a discussion of accounting policies relating to securities, see Note 12 on pages 134136 of
JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report. The following table presents realized gains and losses from
available-for-sale (AFS) securities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains |
|
$ |
459 |
|
|
$ |
252 |
|
|
$ |
1,271 |
|
|
$ |
322 |
|
Realized losses |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(167 |
) |
|
|
(306 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized securities gains (losses)(a) |
|
$ |
424 |
|
|
$ |
237 |
|
|
$ |
1,104 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Proceeds from securities sold were within approximately 2% of amortized cost for the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007. |
117
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of AFS and held-to-maturity securities were as
follows for the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
(in millions) |
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
cost |
|
|
gains |
|
|
losses |
|
|
value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and federal
agency obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. treasuries |
|
$ |
3,851 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
50 |
|
|
$ |
3,802 |
|
|
$ |
2,470 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
2,482 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
9,178 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
9,157 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
Agency obligations |
|
|
71 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
Collateralized mortgage obligations |
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government-sponsored enterprise
obligations: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed securities |
|
|
84,135 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
|
83,858 |
|
|
|
62,505 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
63,091 |
|
Direct obligations |
|
|
1,703 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
1,705 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
Obligations of state and political
subdivisions |
|
|
2,362 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
2,341 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
91 |
|
Certificates of deposit |
|
|
2,611 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,611 |
|
|
|
2,040 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,040 |
|
Debt securities issued by non-U.S.
governments |
|
|
8,265 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
8,274 |
|
|
|
6,804 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
6,794 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
1,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,596 |
|
|
|
1,927 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
1,924 |
|
Equity securities |
|
|
2,020 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2,035 |
|
|
|
4,124 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
4,178 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime |
|
|
7,206 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
|
|
6,683 |
|
|
|
3,551 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
3,553 |
|
Subprime |
|
|
283 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
384 |
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
Alt-A |
|
|
796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
4,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S. residential |
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
756 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card receivables |
|
|
11,862 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
11,487 |
|
|
|
775 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
728 |
|
Home equity lines |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other consumer loans |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
547 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial loans |
|
|
10,135 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
668 |
|
|
|
9,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale securities |
|
$ |
152,777 |
|
|
$ |
333 |
|
|
$ |
2,367 |
|
|
$ |
150,743 |
|
|
$ |
84,788 |
|
|
$ |
790 |
|
|
$ |
172 |
|
|
$ |
85,406 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-to-maturity securities(a) |
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
44 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
45 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Consists primarily of mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. government-sponsored
entities. |
AFS securities in unrealized loss positions are analyzed in depth as part of the Firms
ongoing assessment of other-than-temporary impairment. Potential
other-than-temporary impairment of
AFS securities is considered using a variety of factors, including the length of time and extent to
which the market value has been less than cost; the financial condition and near-term prospects of
the issuer or underlying collateral of a security and the Firms intent and ability to retain the
security in order to allow for an anticipated recovery in fair value. Where applicable under EITF
Issue 99-20, the Firm estimates the cash flows over the life of the security to determine if any
adverse changes have occurred that require an other-than-temporary impairment charge. The Firm
applies EITF Issue 99-20 to beneficial interests in securitizations that are rated below AA at
acquisition or that can be contractually prepaid or otherwise settled in such a way that the Firm
would not recover substantially all of its recorded investment. The Firm considers a decline in
fair value to be other-than-temporary if it is probable that the Firm will not recover its recorded
investment, including as applicable under EITF Issue 99-20, when an adverse change in cash flows
has occurred.
The Firms analysis of impairment includes an examination of the issuers financial condition, the
underlying credit quality of the issuer or underlying collateral and other performance indicators
relevant to the specific investment. For asset-backed investments, such relevant performance
indicators may include ratings, valuation of subordinated positions in current and/or stress
scenarios, excess spread or overcollateralization levels, and whether certain protective triggers
have been reached. For mortgage-backed investments, such relevant performance indicators may
include ratings, prepayment speeds, delinquencies, default rates, loss severities, geographic
concentration, and forecasted performance under various home price decline stress scenarios.
118
Approximately
$2.3 billion of the unrealized losses as of September 30,
2008, have not existed for longer than 12
months, and primarily relate to U.S. government-sponsored enterprise mortgage-backed securities,
prime mortgage-backed securities, collateralized loan obligations and credit card collateralized
securities. The prime mortgage-backed securities and collateralized loan obligations are primarily
rated AAA while the credit card collateralized securities include AAA, A and BBB ratings. These
securities are subjected to the analyses described above, which indicate that the unrealized losses
result from liquidity conditions in the current market environment and not from concerns regarding
the credit of the issuers or underlying collateral. The Firm does not believe it is probable that
it will not recover its investments given the current levels of collateral and credit enhancements
that exist to protect the investments.
The Firm intends to hold the securities in an unrealized loss position for a period of time
sufficient to allow for an anticipated recovery in fair value, or to their contractual maturities.
The Firm has sufficient capital and liquidity to be able to hold these securities until recovery or
maturity. Based on the Firms evaluation of the factors and other objective evidence described
above, the Firm believes that the securities are not other-than-temporarily impaired as of
September 30, 2008.
NOTE 12 SECURITIES FINANCING ACTIVITIES
For a discussion of accounting policies relating to securities financing activities, see Note 13 on
page 136 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
Resale agreements and repurchase agreements are generally treated as collateralized financing
transactions and carried on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at the amounts the securities will be
subsequently sold or repurchased, plus accrued interest. Securities borrowed and securities lent,
also treated as collateral financing transactions, are generally recorded at the amount of cash
collateral advanced or received.
On January 1, 2007, pursuant to the adoption of SFAS 159, the Firm elected fair value measurement
for certain resale and repurchase agreements. In the second quarter of 2008, the Firm elected fair
value measurement for certain newly transacted securities borrowed and securities lending
agreements. For a further discussion of SFAS 159, see Note 4 on pages 109111 of this Form 10-Q.
The securities financing agreements for which the fair value option has been elected continue to be
reported within securities purchased under resale agreements; securities loaned or sold under
repurchase agreements; securities borrowed; and other borrowed funds on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets. Generally, for agreements carried at fair value, current period interest accruals are
recorded within interest income and interest expense with changes in fair value reported in
principal transactions revenue. However, for financial instruments containing embedded derivatives
that would be separately accounted for in accordance with SFAS 133, all changes in fair value,
including any interest elements, are reported in principal transactions revenue.
Securities financing transactions that meet the criteria within FIN 41 are reported on a net basis.
The following table details the components of collateralized agreements, and collateralized
financings at each of the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities purchased under resale agreements(a) |
|
$ |
228,747 |
|
|
$ |
169,305 |
|
Securities borrowed(b) |
|
|
152,050 |
|
|
|
84,184 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under repurchase agreements(c) |
|
$ |
195,629 |
|
|
$ |
126,098 |
|
Securities loaned |
|
|
11,144 |
|
|
|
10,922 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes resale agreements of $20.1 billion and $19.1 billion accounted for at fair value
at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(b) |
|
Includes securities borrowed of $3.7 billion accounted for at fair value at September 30,
2008. |
(c) |
|
Includes repurchase agreements of $3.3 billion and $5.8 billion accounted for at fair value
at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
119
JPMorgan Chase pledges certain financial instruments it owns to collateralize repurchase
agreements and other securities financings. Pledged securities that can be sold or repledged by the
secured party are identified as financial instruments owned (pledged to various parties) on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
At September 30, 2008, the Firm received securities as collateral that could be repledged,
delivered or otherwise used with a fair value of approximately $603.8 billion. This collateral was
generally obtained under resale or securities borrowing agreements. Of these securities,
approximately $492.3 billion were repledged, delivered or otherwise used, generally as collateral
under repurchase agreements, securities lending agreements or to cover short sales.
NOTE 13 LOANS
The accounting for a loan may differ based upon whether it is originated or purchased and on
whether it is used in an investing or trading strategy. For purchased
loans held for investment, the accounting also
differs depending on whether a loan is credit impaired at the date of acquisition. Loans with
evidence of credit deterioration since origination and for which it is probable that all
contractually required payments receivable will not be collected are considered to be credit
impaired. The measurement framework for loans in the consolidated financial statements is one of
the following:
|
|
At the principal amount outstanding, net of the allowance for loan losses, unearned income
and any net deferred loan fees or costs, for loans held-for-investment (other than purchased
credit impaired loans); |
|
|
|
Purchased credit impaired loans held-for-investment are accounted for under SOP 03-3 and
initially measured at fair value, which includes estimated future credit losses. Accordingly,
an allowance for loan losses related to these loans is not recorded at the acquisition date.
Subsequent to the acquisition date, increases in cash flows over those expected at acquisition
may be recognized as interest income on a level-yield basis if the timing and amount of future
cash flows is reasonably estimable. Decreases in expected cash flows after the acquisition
date are recognized through the allowance for loan losses; |
|
|
|
At the lower of cost or fair value, with valuation changes recorded in noninterest revenue,
for loans that are classified as held-for-sale; or |
|
|
|
At fair value, with changes in fair value recorded in noninterest revenue, for loans
classified as trading assets or risk managed on a fair value basis. |
For a detailed discussion of accounting policies relating to loans, see Note 14 on pages 137138
of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report. See Note 4 on pages 109111 of this Form 10-Q for further
information on the Firms elections of fair value accounting under SFAS 159. See Note 5 on pages
111113 of this Form 10-Q for further information on loans carried at fair value and classified as
trading assets.
Interest income is recognized using the interest method, or on a basis approximating a level rate
of return over the term of the loan.
Loans within the held-for-investment portfolio that management decides to sell are transferred to
the held-for-sale portfolio. Transfers to held-for-sale are recorded at the lower of cost or fair
value on the date of transfer. Losses attributed to credit losses are charged off to the allowance
for loan losses and losses due to changes in interest rates, or exchange rates, are recognized in
noninterest revenue.
Loans within the held-for-sale portfolio that management decides to retain are transferred to the
held-for-investment portfolio at fair value. The allowance for loan losses for such loans is based
upon the Firms allowance methodology. For a further discussion of the methodologies used in
establishing the Firms allowance for loans losses, see Note 15 on page 138 of JPMorgan Chases
2007 Annual Report.
In connection with the Washington Mutual transaction, JPMorgan Chase acquired certain loans that it
deemed to be credit impaired under SOP 03-3. Wholesale loans were generally determined to be credit
impaired if Washington Mutual had previously accounted for them as impaired loans under SFAS 114.
Consumer loans were preliminarily determined to be credit impaired based upon specific risk
characteristics of the loan, including delinquency status, geographic location, loan-to-value
ratios and product type.
SOP 03-3 allows purchasers to aggregate credit impaired loans acquired in the same fiscal quarter
into one or more pools, provided that the loans have common risk characteristics. A pool is then
accounted for as a single asset with a single composite interest rate and an aggregate expectation
of cash flows. With respect to the Washington Mutual transaction, all of the consumer loans are
being aggregated into pools of loans with common risk characteristics, while wholesale loans are
being accounted for individually.
At September 30, 2008, the preliminary estimate of the contractually required payments receivable for these loans were $108.8 billion, the
cash flows expected to be collected were $148.1 billion, including $68.9 billion of interest, and the estimated fair value of the loans was $78.1 billion.
Each of the preceding amounts was
120
determined based upon the estimated remaining life of the underlying loans, which include the
effects of estimated prepayments. At September 30, 2008, $272 million of these loans were classified
as nonperforming assets; interest income is expected to be recognized
on the remaining $77.8 billion
of loans. Due to the short time period between the closing of the
transaction (which occurred simultaneously with the announcement on
September 25, 2008) and the end of the third quarter, certain
amounts related to the purchased credit impaired loans disclosed
herein are preliminary estimates. The Firm expects to finalize its
analysis of these purchased credit impaired loans during the fourth
quarter of 2008; expanded disclosures will be provided at that time
and adjustments to estimated amounts may occur.
The composition of the loan portfolio at each of the dates indicated was as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. wholesale loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
$ |
142,461 |
|
|
$ |
97,347 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
14,016 |
|
|
|
13,388 |
|
Financial institutions |
|
|
30,921 |
|
|
|
14,760 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
2,170 |
|
|
|
2,353 |
|
Other |
|
|
12,602 |
|
|
|
5,405 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total U.S. wholesale loans |
|
|
202,170 |
|
|
|
133,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S. wholesale loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
57,497 |
|
|
|
59,153 |
|
Real estate |
|
|
1,850 |
|
|
|
2,110 |
|
Financial institutions |
|
|
25,003 |
|
|
|
17,225 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
883 |
|
|
|
1,198 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,042 |
|
|
|
137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total non-U.S. wholesale loans |
|
|
86,275 |
|
|
|
79,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total wholesale loans:(a) |
Commercial and industrial |
|
|
199,958 |
|
|
|
156,500 |
|
Real estate(b) |
|
|
15,866 |
|
|
|
15,498 |
|
Financial institutions |
|
|
55,924 |
|
|
|
31,985 |
|
Lease financing |
|
|
3,053 |
|
|
|
3,551 |
|
Other |
|
|
13,644 |
|
|
|
5,542 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total wholesale loans |
|
|
288,445 |
|
|
|
213,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans:(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
116,804 |
|
|
|
94,832 |
|
Prime mortgage |
|
|
70,375 |
|
|
|
40,558 |
|
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
18,162 |
|
|
|
15,473 |
|
Option ARMs(d) |
|
|
18,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
Auto loans and leases |
|
|
43,306 |
|
|
|
42,350 |
|
Credit card(e) |
|
|
92,723 |
|
|
|
84,352 |
|
Other |
|
|
34,724 |
|
|
|
28,733 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans excluding purchased credit impaired |
|
|
395,083 |
|
|
|
306,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer loans purchased credit impaired |
|
|
77,853 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
472,936 |
|
|
|
306,298 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans(f) |
|
$ |
761,381 |
|
|
$ |
519,374 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Memo: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans held-for-sale |
|
$ |
9,188 |
|
|
$ |
18,899 |
|
Loans at fair value |
|
|
9,396 |
|
|
|
8,739 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value |
|
$ |
18,584 |
|
|
$ |
27,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes Investment Bank, Commercial Banking, Treasury & Securities Services and Asset
Management. |
(b) |
|
Represents credits extended for real estate-related purposes to borrowers who are primarily
in the real estate development or investment businesses and which the primary repayment is
from the sale, lease, management, operations or refinancing of the property. |
(c) |
|
Includes Retail Financial Services, Card Services and the Corporate/Private Equity segment. |
(d) |
|
The total amount by which
the unpaid principal balance of option ARM loans exceeded their
original principal amount was $2.1 billion at September 30, 2008. |
(e) |
|
Includes billed finance charges and fees net of an allowance for uncollectible amounts. |
(f) |
|
Loans (other than purchased credit impaired loans and those for which the SFAS 159 fair
value option has been elected) are presented net of unearned income and net deferred loan
fees of $917 million and $1.0 billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
respectively. Purchased credit impaired loans are reported at fair value as of the
acquisition date. |
The following table reflects information about the Firms loan sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gains (losses) on sales of loans (including |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
lower of cost or fair value adjustments)(a) |
|
$ |
(650 |
) |
|
$ |
(403 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,602 |
) |
|
$ |
(40 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes sales related to loans accounted for at fair value. |
121
Impaired loans
A loan is considered impaired when, based upon current information and events, it is probable
that the Firm will be unable to collect all amounts due (including principal and interest)
according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans include certain
nonaccrual wholesale loans and loans for which a charge-off has been recorded based upon the fair
value of the underlying collateral. Impaired loans also include loans that have been modified in
troubled debt restructurings as a concession to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties.
Troubled debt restructurings typically result from the Firms loss mitigation activities and could
include rate reductions, principal forgiveness, forbearance and other actions intended to minimize
the economic loss and to avoid foreclosure or repossession of collateral. Purchased credit
impaired loans are not required to be reported as impaired loans as long as they continue to
perform at least as well as expected at acquisition. Accordingly, none of the credit impaired
loans acquired in the Washington Mutual transaction are reported in the following tables.
The tables below set forth information about JPMorgan Chases impaired loans, excluding credit card loans which are discussed below. The Firm primarily uses the discounted cash flow
method for valuing impaired loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans with an allowance: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale |
|
$ |
1,039 |
|
|
$ |
429 |
|
Consumer(a) |
|
|
1,521 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans with an allowance |
|
|
2,560 |
|
|
|
751 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired loans without an allowance:(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
Consumer(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans without an allowance |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
2,603 |
|
|
$ |
779 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for impaired loans under SFAS 114: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale |
|
$ |
253 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
Consumer(a) |
|
|
298 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for impaired loans under SFAS 114(c) |
|
$ |
551 |
|
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average balance of impaired loans during the
period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale |
|
$ |
864 |
|
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
$ |
744 |
|
|
$ |
288 |
|
Consumer(a) |
|
|
1,298 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total impaired loans |
|
$ |
2,162 |
|
|
$ |
679 |
|
|
$ |
1,703 |
|
|
$ |
605 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income recognized on impaired loans during
the period: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wholesale |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
Consumer(a) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest income recognized on impaired loans
during the period |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excluded credit card loans. |
(b) |
|
When the discounted cash flows, collateral value or market price equals or exceeds the
carrying value of the loan, then the loan does not require an allowance under SFAS 114. |
(c) |
|
The allowance for impaired loans under SFAS 114 is included in JPMorgan Chases allowance for
loan losses. The allowance for certain consumer impaired loans has been categorized in the
allowance for loan losses as formula-based. |
JPMorgan Chase may modify the terms of its credit card loan agreements with borrowers who have
experienced financial difficulty. Such modifications may include: canceling the customers
available line of credit on the credit card, reducing the interest rate on the card, and placing
the customer on a fixed payment plan not exceeding 60 months. If the cardholder does not comply
with the modified terms, then the credit card loan agreement will revert back to its original
terms, with the amount of any loan outstanding reflected in the appropriate delinquency bucket
and the loan amounts then charged-off in accordance with the Firms standard charge-off policy.
Under these programs, $2.0 billion and $1.4 billion of on-balance sheet credit card loan
outstandings have been modified at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. In
accordance with the Firms methodology for determining its consumer allowance for loan losses, the
Firm had already provisioned for these credit card loans; the modifications to these credit card
loans had no incremental impact on the Firms allowance for loan losses.
122
NOTE 14 ALLOWANCE FOR CREDIT LOSSES
For a further discussion of the allowance for credit losses and the related accounting policies,
see Note 15 on pages 138139 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report. The table below summarizes
the changes in the allowance for loan losses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses at January 1 |
|
$ |
9,234 |
|
|
$ |
7,279 |
|
Cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses at January 1, adjusted |
|
|
9,234 |
|
|
|
7,223 |
|
Gross charge-offs |
|
|
(7,215 |
) |
|
|
(3,731 |
) |
Gross recoveries |
|
|
695 |
|
|
|
622 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net charge-offs |
|
|
(6,520 |
) |
|
|
(3,109 |
) |
Provision for loan losses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision excluding accounting policy conformity |
|
|
11,827 |
|
|
|
3,988 |
|
Provision for loan losses accounting policy conformity(b) |
|
|
1,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision |
|
|
13,803 |
|
|
|
3,988 |
|
Addition resulting from Washington Mutual transaction |
|
|
2,535 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for loan losses at September 30 |
|
$ |
19,052 |
|
|
$ |
8,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-specific(c) |
|
$ |
323 |
|
|
$ |
123 |
|
Formula-based(c) |
|
|
18,729 |
|
|
|
7,990 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for loan losses |
|
$ |
19,052 |
|
|
$ |
8,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reflects the effect of the adoption of SFAS 159 at January 1, 2007. For a further
discussion of SFAS 159, see Note 4 on pages 109111 of this Form 10-Q. |
(b) |
|
Related to the Washington Mutual transaction in the third quarter of 2008. |
(c) |
|
Prior periods have been revised to reflect the current presentation. |
The table below summarizes the changes in the allowance for lending-related commitments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for lending-related commitments at January 1 |
|
$ |
850 |
|
|
$ |
524 |
|
Provision for lending-related commitments |
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for lending-related commitments at September 30 |
|
$ |
713 |
|
|
$ |
858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Components: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-specific |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
27 |
|
Formula-based |
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total allowance for lending-related commitments |
|
$ |
713 |
|
|
$ |
858 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
123
NOTE
15 ACCRUED INTEREST AND ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE, OTHER ASSETS, AND ACCOUNTS
PAYABLE, ACCRUED EXPENSE AND OTHER LIABILITIES
The following table details the components of accrued interest and accounts receivable, other
assets, and accounts payable, accrued expense and other liabilities at each of the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest and accounts receivable: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued interest |
|
$ |
9,438 |
|
|
$ |
8,432 |
|
Brokerage receivables(a) |
|
|
68,326 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
26,468 |
|
|
|
16,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
104,232 |
|
|
$ |
24,823 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed commercial paper(b) |
|
$ |
61,321 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Other |
|
|
119,500 |
|
|
|
74,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
180,821 |
|
|
$ |
74,314 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable, accrued expense and other liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
35,734 |
|
|
$ |
20,448 |
|
Brokerage payables: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables to customers |
|
|
85,569 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other brokerage payables(c) |
|
|
61,312 |
|
|
|
14,612 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total brokerage payables |
|
|
146,881 |
|
|
|
14,612 |
|
Accrued expense |
|
|
11,896 |
|
|
|
19,337 |
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
66,052 |
|
|
|
40,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
260,563 |
|
|
$ |
94,476 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes receivables from
customers, primarily from activities related to IBs prime
services business; receivables from brokers, dealers and clearing
organizations; and securities fails. |
(b) |
|
On September 19,
2008, the Federal Reserve established a special lending
facility, the AML Facility, to provide
liquidity to eligible money market mutual funds. The Firm is currently participating in the AML Facility. At
September 30, 2008, the ABCP investments were elected under the fair value option and recorded
in other assets; the corresponding nonrecourse liability to the FRBB in the same amount was
also elected under the fair value option and was recorded in other
borrowed funds. For a discussion on the AML Facility, see page 8 of
this Form 10-Q. |
(c) |
|
Includes payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations, and securities fails. |
NOTE 16 LOAN SECURITIZATIONS
JPMorgan Chase securitizes and sells a variety of its consumer and wholesale loans, including
warehouse loans that are classified as trading assets. JPMorgan Chase-sponsored securitizations
utilize special purpose entities (SPEs) as part of the securitization process. These SPEs are
structured to meet the definition of a qualifying special purpose entity (QSPE) (for a further
discussion, see Note 1 on page 108 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report); accordingly, the assets
and liabilities of securitization-related QSPEs are not reflected in the Firms Consolidated
Balance Sheets (except for retained interests, as described below) but are included on the balance
sheet of the QSPE purchasing the assets. The primary purpose of these vehicles is to meet investor
needs and to generate liquidity for the Firm through the sale of loans to the QSPEs.
Consumer activities include securitization of credit card, residential mortgage, automobile and
education loans that are originated or purchased by Retail Financial Services (RFS) and Card
Services (CS). CS retains servicing for all its originated credit card loans. It also has an
undivided interest in its credit card master trusts and other retained senior and subordinated
interests. RFS retains servicing for all of its originated and purchased mortgage, automobile and
education loans and may retain servicing for certain mortgage loans purchased by the IB. In a
limited number of securitizations, RFS may retain a residual interest.
124
Wholesale activities include IB securitizations of purchased residential mortgage loans, certain
mortgage loans originated by RFS and commercial loans (primarily real estate-related) originated by
the IB. Residential mortgages securitized by the IB are either serviced by RFS, third parties or by
the IB. The IB may
retain a residual interest in residential mortgage and non-mortgage consumer loans. The IB does not
generally retain a residual interest in the Firms sponsored commercial mortgage securitizations.
See pages 106107 of this Form 10-Q for further details on the Firms retained interests in
securitized loans.
Assets held by JPMorgan Chase-sponsored securitization-related QSPEs as of September 30, 2008, and
December 31, 2007, were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in billions) |
|
September 30, 2008(c) |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card |
|
$ |
128.6 |
|
|
$ |
92.7 |
|
Auto |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Residential mortgage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime(a) |
|
|
78.0 |
|
|
|
22.9 |
|
Subprime |
|
|
29.4 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Option ARMs |
|
|
37.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Education loans |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Wholesale activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime(a) |
|
|
164.0 |
|
|
|
55.4 |
|
Subprime |
|
|
34.8 |
|
|
|
20.6 |
|
Commercial and other(b) |
|
|
170.6 |
|
|
|
109.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
645.3 |
|
|
$ |
307.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes Alt-A loans. |
(b) |
|
Commercial and other consists of commercial loans (primarily real estate), non-mortgage
consumer receivables purchased from third parties and co-sponsored securitizations, which
include non-JPMorgan Chase originated assets. |
(c) |
|
Includes securitization-related QSPEs sponsored by heritage Bear Stearns and heritage
Washington Mutual Bank. |
Total assets in the above table includes securitized loans where the Firm has no continuing
involvement, predominantly commercial mortgages, as well as securitized loans where the Firms only
continuing involvement is servicing the loans. The table also includes securitized loans where the
Firm owns less than a majority of the subordinated or residual interests in the securitizations.
See pages 106107 for further details on the Firms retained interests in securitized loans.
The following tables summarize new securitization transactions that were completed during the three
and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007; the resulting gains arising from such
securitizations; certain cash flows received from such securitizations; and the key economic
assumptions used in measuring the retained interests (if any) other than residential MSRs (for a
discussion of residential MSRs, see Note 18 on pages 135137 of this Form 10-Q) as of the dates of
such sales.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
Consumer activities |
|
|
Wholesale activities |
(in millions, except rates and where |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
Education |
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
Commercial |
|
otherwise noted) |
|
Credit card |
|
|
Auto |
|
|
Prime(b) |
|
|
Subprime(e) |
|
|
loans |
|
|
Prime(b) |
|
|
Subprime |
|
|
and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal securitized |
|
$ |
6,085 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
361 |
|
Pretax gains |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from securitizations |
|
$ |
6,085 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
357 |
|
Servicing fees collected |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other cash flows received |
|
|
260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from collections reinvested
in revolving securitizations |
|
|
36,641 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key assumptions (rates per annum): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment rate(a) |
|
|
18.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
|
PPR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average life (in years) |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Loss assumption |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Discount rate |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
Consumer activities |
|
Wholesale activities |
(in millions, except rates and where |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
Education |
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
Commercial |
|
otherwise noted) |
|
Credit card |
|
|
Auto |
|
|
Prime(b) |
|
|
Subprime(e) |
|
|
loans |
|
|
Prime(b) |
|
|
Subprime |
|
|
and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal securitized |
|
$ |
3,455 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,609 |
|
|
$ |
1,225 |
|
|
$ |
1,168 |
|
|
$ |
2,850 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,868 |
|
Pretax gains |
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
)(c) |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
(5 |
)(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from securitizations |
|
$ |
3,455 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,584 |
|
|
$ |
1,231 |
|
|
$ |
1,168 |
|
|
$ |
2,775 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,987 |
|
Servicing fees collected |
|
|
49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
Other cash flows received |
|
|
226 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from collections reinvested
in revolving securitizations |
|
|
37,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key assumptions (rates per annum): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment rate(a) |
|
|
20.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0-8.0 |
% |
|
|
24.5 |
% |
|
|
30.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PPR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPR |
|
|
|
CPR |
|
|
|
CPR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average life (in years) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
1.3-5.2 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Loss assumption |
|
|
3.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%(d) |
|
|
0.8 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Discount rate |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
6.3-18.0 |
% |
|
|
26.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
|
Consumer activities |
|
Wholesale activities |
(in millions, except rates and where |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
Education |
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
Commercial |
|
otherwise noted) |
|
Credit card |
|
|
Auto |
|
|
Prime(b) |
|
|
Subprime(e) |
|
|
loans |
|
|
Prime(b) |
|
|
Subprime |
|
|
and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal securitized |
|
$ |
21,390 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,023 |
|
Pretax gains |
|
|
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from securitizations |
|
$ |
21,389 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
989 |
|
Servicing fees collected |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other cash flows received |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from collections reinvested
in revolving securitizations |
|
|
113,563 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key assumptions (rates per annum): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment rate(a) |
|
|
17.9-20.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
|
PPR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average life (in years) |
|
|
0.4-0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
Loss assumption |
|
|
4.2-4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Discount rate |
|
|
12.0-13.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
Consumer activities |
|
Wholesale activities |
(in millions, except rates and where |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
Education |
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
Commercial |
|
otherwise noted) |
|
Credit card |
|
|
Auto |
|
|
Prime(b) |
|
|
Subprime(e) |
|
|
loans |
|
|
Prime(b) |
|
|
Subprime |
|
|
and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Principal securitized |
|
$ |
14,160 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,609 |
|
|
$ |
6,150 |
|
|
$ |
1,168 |
|
|
$ |
8,141 |
|
|
$ |
613 |
|
|
$ |
11,735 |
|
Pretax gains |
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28 |
(c) |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
2 |
(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from securitizations |
|
$ |
14,160 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
20,421 |
|
|
$ |
6,236 |
|
|
$ |
1,168 |
|
|
$ |
8,013 |
|
|
$ |
608 |
|
|
$ |
11,958 |
|
Servicing fees collected |
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
Other cash flows received |
|
|
458 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from collections reinvested
in revolving securitizations |
|
|
109,909 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key assumptions (rates per annum): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment rate(a) |
|
|
20.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.8-24.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0-8.0 |
% |
|
|
13.7-37.2 |
% |
|
|
30.0-48.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0-8.0 |
% |
|
|
|
PPR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPR |
|
|
|
CPR |
|
|
|
CPR |
|
|
|
CPR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average life (in years) |
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.2-4.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.1 |
|
|
|
1.3-5.4 |
|
|
|
2.3-2.8 |
|
|
|
1.3-10.2 |
|
Loss assumption |
|
|
3.5-3.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%(d) |
|
|
0.6-1.6 |
% |
|
|
1.2-2.2 |
% |
|
|
0.0-1.0 |
%(d) |
Discount rate |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.8-13.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
6.3-20.0 |
% |
|
|
12.1-26.7 |
% |
|
|
10.0-14.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
PPR: principal payment rate; CPR: constant prepayment rate. |
(b) |
|
Includes Alt-A loans. |
(c) |
|
The Firm adopted the fair value option election for the IB warehouse and the RFS prime
mortgage warehouse. The carrying value of these loans accounted for at fair value approximates
the proceeds received from securitization. |
(d) |
|
Expected credit losses for prime residential mortgage, education and certain wholesale
securitizations are minimal and are incorporated into other assumptions. |
(e) |
|
Interests in subprime residential mortgage securitizations for consumer activities are held
by IB, and the key assumptions used in measuring these retained interests are reported under
subprime residential mortgages for wholesale activities. |
126
In addition to the amounts reported for securitization activity in the preceding tables, the
Firm sold residential mortgage loans totaling $31.9 billion and $21.5 billion during the three
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, primarily for securitization by the
Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA), Federal
National Mortgage Association (Fannie
Mae) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (Freddie Mac); these sales resulted in pretax gains (losses) of $4 million and $(20)
million, respectively. During the first nine months of 2008 and 2007, JPMorgan Chase sold
residential mortgage loans totaling $101.0 billion and $57.3 billion, respectively, primarily for
securitization by the GNMA, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac; these sales resulted in pretax gains of
$30 million and $67 million, respectively.
Retained servicing
JPMorgan Chase retains servicing responsibilities for all originated, and certain purchased,
residential mortgage, credit card, education and automobile loan securitizations and for certain
commercial activity securitizations it sponsors, and receives servicing fees based upon the
securitized loan balance plus certain ancillary fees. The Firm also retains the right to service
the residential mortgage loans it sells to GNMA, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac in accordance with
their servicing guidelines and standards. For a discussion of mortgage servicing rights, see Note
18 on pages 135137 of this Form 10-Q.
Retained securitization interests
At September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, the Firm had, with respect to its credit card master
trusts, $29.4 billion and $18.6 billion, respectively, related to undivided interests, and $3.4
billion and $2.7 billion, respectively, related to subordinated interests in accrued interest and
fees on the securitized receivables, net of an allowance for uncollectible amounts. Credit card
securitization trusts require the Firm to maintain a minimum undivided interest of 4% to 12% of the
principal receivables in the trusts. The Firm maintained an average undivided interest in principal
receivables in the trusts of approximately 21% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, and
19% for the year ended December 31, 2007.
The Firm also maintains escrow accounts up to predetermined limits for some credit card, automobile
and education securitizations to cover the unlikely event of deficiencies in cash flows owed to
investors. The amounts available in such escrow accounts are recorded in other assets and, as of
September 30, 2008, amounted to $47 million, $9 million and $3 million for credit card, automobile
and education securitizations, respectively; as of December 31, 2007, these amounts were $97
million, $21 million and $3 million for credit card, automobile and education securitizations,
respectively.
The following table summarizes other retained securitization interests, and are carried at fair
value on the Firms Consolidated Balance Sheets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card(a)(b) |
|
$ |
6,887 |
|
|
$ |
887 |
|
Auto(a) |
|
|
54 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Residential mortgage(a): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime(c) |
|
|
286 |
|
|
|
128 |
|
Subprime |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
93 |
|
Option ARMs |
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
Education loans |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
Wholesale activities(d)(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime(c) |
|
|
205 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
Subprime |
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
294 |
|
Commercial and other |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
42 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(f) |
|
$ |
7,715 |
|
|
$ |
1,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Pretax unrealized gains (losses) recorded in stockholders equity that relate to
retained securitization interests on consumer activities totaled $(49) million and $(14)
million for credit card; $3 million and $3 million for automobile and $4 million and $44
million for residential mortgages at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(b) |
|
The credit card retained interest amount noted above includes subordinated securities
retained by the Firm totaling $2.6 billion and $284 million at September 30, 2008, and
December 31, 2007, respectively, and senior securities retained by the Firm totaling $3.6
billion at September 30, 2008. Of the securities retained, $5.7 billion and $284 million are
classified as AFS securities at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively, and
$443 million are classified as trading assets at September 30, 2008. There were no senior
securities retained by the Firm or securities retained classified as trading assets at
December 31, 2007. A portion of the AFS securities were used by the Firm as collateral for a
secured financing transaction. The securities are valued using quoted market prices for
similar assets and therefore are not included in the key economic assumptions and
sensitivities table that follows. |
(c) |
|
Includes Alt-A loans. |
(d) |
|
In addition to these wholesale retained interests, the Firm also retained subordinated
securities totaling $15 million at September 30, 2008, and $22 million at December 31, 2007,
predominantly from resecuritizations activities that are classified as trading assets. These
securities are valued using quoted market prices and therefore are not included in the key
assumptions and sensitivities table that follows. |
(e) |
|
Some consumer activities securitization interests are retained by IB and reported under
wholesale activities. |
127
|
|
|
(f) |
|
In addition to the retained interests described above, the Firm also held investment-grade
interests of $4.6 billion and $9.7 billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
respectively that the Firm expects to sell to investors in the normal course of its
underwriting activity or that are purchased in connection with secondary market-making
activities. |
The table below outlines the key economic assumptions used to determine the fair value of the
Firms retained interests other than residential MSRs (for a discussion of residential MSRs, see
Note 18 on pages 135137 of this Form 10-Q) in its securitization trusts at September 30, 2008,
and December 31, 2007, respectively; in addition, it outlines the sensitivities of those fair
values to immediate 10% and 20% adverse changes in those assumptions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer activities |
|
Wholesale activities |
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except rates and where |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option |
|
|
Education |
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
Commercial |
|
otherwise noted) |
|
Credit card |
|
|
Auto |
|
|
Prime(b) |
|
|
Subprime |
|
|
ARMs |
|
|
loans |
|
|
Prime(b) |
|
|
Subprime |
|
|
and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average life (in
years) |
|
|
0.5-0.6 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
4.8-7.4 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
8.3 |
|
|
|
0.1-6.9 |
|
|
|
3.9-7.3 |
|
|
|
0.4-12.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment rate(a) |
|
|
14.1-16.7 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
7.6-13.7 |
% |
|
|
31.1 |
% |
|
|
27.0 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
6.1-20.1 |
% |
|
|
5.0-22.6 |
% |
|
|
0.2-75.0% |
(d) |
|
|
|
PPR |
|
|
ABS |
|
|
CPR |
|
|
|
CPR |
|
|
|
CPR |
|
|
|
CPR |
|
|
|
CPR |
|
|
|
CPR |
|
|
|
CPR |
|
Impact of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(68 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(11 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
Impact of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(137 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss assumption |
|
|
3.9-5.6 |
% |
|
|
0.5 |
% |
|
|
0.0-3.7% |
(c) |
|
|
1.3 |
% |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
|
%(c) |
|
|
2.3-5.6 |
% |
|
|
4.2-9.9 |
% |
|
|
0.0-1.1% |
(c) |
Impact of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(181 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(4 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
(22 |
) |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
Impact of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(363 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
) |
Discount rate |
|
|
13.0 |
% |
|
|
5.3 |
% |
|
|
16.0-31.5 |
% |
|
|
15.0-30.0 |
% |
|
|
37.0 |
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
13.1-25.0 |
% |
|
|
20.3-23.5 |
% |
|
|
0.4-31.6 |
% |
Impact of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(20 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
(7 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
Impact of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer activities |
|
Wholesale activities |
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except rates and where |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option |
|
|
Education |
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
Commercial |
|
otherwise noted) |
|
Credit card |
|
|
Auto |
|
|
Prime(b) |
|
|
Subprime |
|
|
ARMs |
|
|
loans |
|
|
Prime(b) |
|
|
Subprime |
|
|
and other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average life (in
years) |
|
|
0.4-0.5 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
3.7 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.8 |
|
|
|
2.9-4.9 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
0.3-11.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepayment rate(a) |
|
|
15.6-18.9 |
% |
|
|
1.4 |
% |
|
|
21.1 |
% |
|
|
26.2 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
1.0-8.0 |
% |
|
|
19.0-25.3 |
% |
|
|
25.6 |
% |
|
|
0.0-50.0 |
%(d) |
|
|
|
PPR |
|
|
|
ABS |
|
|
|
CPR |
|
|
|
CPR |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPR |
|
|
|
CPR |
|
|
|
CPR |
|
|
|
CPR |
|
Impact of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(59 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
(29 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
Impact of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(118 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss assumption |
|
|
3.3-4.6 |
% |
|
|
0.6 |
% |
|
|
|
%(c) |
|
|
1.0 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
|
%(c) |
|
|
0.6-3.0 |
% |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
|
|
0.0-0.9 |
%(c) |
Impact of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(117 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
(66 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
Impact of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(234 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
Discount rate |
|
|
12.0 |
% |
|
|
6.8 |
% |
|
|
12.2 |
% |
|
|
15.0-30.0 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
9.0 |
% |
|
|
11.0-23.9 |
% |
|
|
19.3 |
% |
|
|
1.0-18.0 |
% |
Impact of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(5 |
) |
|
$ |
(2 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(3 |
) |
|
$ |
(13 |
) |
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
Impact of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(26 |
) |
|
|
(27 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
PPR: principal payment rate; ABS: absolute prepayment speed; CPR: constant prepayment rate. |
(b) |
|
Includes Alt-A loans. |
(c) |
|
Expected credit losses are minimal and are incorporated into other assumptions. |
(d) |
|
Prepayment risk on certain wholesale retained interests for commercial and other are minimal and are incorporated into other assumptions. |
The sensitivity analysis in the preceding table is hypothetical. Changes in fair value based
upon a 10% or 20% variation in assumptions generally cannot be extrapolated easily because the
relationship of the change in the assumptions to the change in fair value may not be linear. Also,
in the table, the effect that a change in a particular assumption may have on the fair value is
calculated without changing any other assumption. In reality, changes in one factor may result in
changes in another, which might counteract or magnify the sensitivities. The above sensitivities do
not reflect the Firms risk management practices that may be undertaken to mitigate such risks.
128
The table below presents information about delinquencies, net charge-offs (recoveries) and
components of reported and securitized financial assets at September 30, 2008, and December 31,
2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonaccrual and 90 days |
|
|
|
|
Total loans |
or
more past
due(f)(g) |
Net loan charge-offs (recoveries) |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Sept. 30, |
|
|
Dec. 31, |
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
$ |
116,804 |
|
|
$ |
94,832 |
|
|
$ |
1,142 |
|
|
$ |
786 |
|
|
$ |
663 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
1,621 |
|
|
$ |
316 |
|
Prime mortgage(a) |
|
|
70,375 |
|
|
|
40,558 |
|
|
|
1,496 |
|
|
|
501 |
|
|
|
177 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
331 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
18,162 |
|
|
|
15,473 |
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
1,017 |
|
|
|
273 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
614 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
Option ARMs |
|
|
18,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto loans and leases |
|
|
43,306 |
|
|
|
42,350 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
99 |
|
|
|
361 |
|
|
|
221 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
92,723 |
|
|
|
84,352 |
|
|
|
1,569 |
|
|
|
1,554 |
|
|
|
1,106 |
|
|
|
785 |
|
|
|
3,159 |
|
|
|
2,247 |
|
All other loans |
|
|
34,724 |
|
|
|
28,733 |
|
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
341 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans
excluding purchased
credit impaired |
|
|
395,083 |
|
|
|
306,298 |
|
|
|
7,092 |
|
|
|
4,315 |
|
|
|
2,432 |
|
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
6,335 |
|
|
|
3,062 |
|
Consumer loans
purchased credit
impaired(b) |
|
|
77,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans |
|
|
472,936 |
|
|
|
306,298 |
|
|
|
7,092 |
(h) |
|
|
4,315 |
(h) |
|
|
2,432 |
|
|
|
1,139 |
|
|
|
6,335 |
|
|
|
3,062 |
|
Total wholesale loans |
|
|
288,445 |
|
|
|
213,076 |
|
|
|
1,495 |
(i) |
|
|
589 |
(i) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans reported |
|
|
761,381 |
|
|
|
519,374 |
|
|
|
8,587 |
|
|
|
4,904 |
|
|
|
2,484 |
|
|
|
1,221 |
|
|
|
6,520 |
|
|
|
3,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized consumer loans: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime(a) |
|
|
41,596 |
|
|
|
9,510 |
|
|
|
1,568 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Subprime |
|
|
19,726 |
|
|
|
2,823 |
|
|
|
5,598 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
Option ARMs |
|
|
23,717 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Automobile |
|
|
956 |
|
|
|
2,276 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Credit card |
|
|
93,664 |
|
|
|
72,701 |
|
|
|
1,741 |
|
|
|
1,050 |
|
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
Other loans |
|
|
1,091 |
|
|
|
1,141 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumer loans
securitized |
|
|
180,750 |
|
|
|
88,451 |
|
|
|
11,278 |
|
|
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
591 |
|
|
|
2,436 |
|
|
|
1,806 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securitized wholesale
activities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime(a) |
|
|
61,536 |
|
|
|
16,839 |
|
|
|
10,304 |
|
|
|
915 |
|
|
|
1,137 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1,819 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
Subprime |
|
|
26,480 |
|
|
|
19,638 |
|
|
|
7,749 |
|
|
|
3,027 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
|
116 |
|
|
|
1,585 |
|
|
|
227 |
|
Commercial and other |
|
|
8,325 |
|
|
|
3,419 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securitized
wholesale activities |
|
|
96,341 |
|
|
|
39,896 |
|
|
|
18,060 |
|
|
|
3,942 |
|
|
|
1,859 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
3,412 |
|
|
|
237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans
securitized(c) |
|
|
277,091 |
|
|
|
128,347 |
|
|
|
29,338 |
|
|
|
5,208 |
|
|
|
2,751 |
|
|
|
710 |
|
|
|
5,848 |
|
|
|
2,043 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total loans reported
and securitized(d) |
|
$ |
1,038,472 |
(e) |
|
$ |
647,721 |
(e) |
|
$ |
37,925 |
|
|
$ |
10,112 |
|
|
$ |
5,235 |
|
|
$ |
1,931 |
|
|
$ |
12,368 |
|
|
$ |
5,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes Alt-A loans. |
(b) |
|
Purchased credit impaired loans represent loans acquired in the Washington Mutual
acquisition that were considered credit impaired under SOP 03-3, and include loans that were
nonperforming prior to the acquisition. Under SOP 03-3, these loans are considered to be
performing loans as of the acquisition date and are initially recorded at fair value and
accrete interest income over the estimated life of the loan when cash flows are reasonably
estimable, even if the underlying loans are contractually past due. The amount disclosed is a
preliminary estimate. Adjustment to this estimated amount could occur during the fourth
quarter of 2008. For additional information, see
Note 13 on pages 120122 of this Form 10-Q. |
(c) |
|
Total assets held in securitization-related SPEs were $645.3 billion and $307.7 billion at
September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. The $277.1 billion and $128.3 billion
of loans securitized at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively, excludes:
$327.7 billion and $159.3 billion of securitized loans, respectively, in which the Firms only
continuing involvement is the servicing of the assets; $29.4 billion and $18.6 billion of
sellers interests in credit card master trusts, respectively; and $11.1 billion and $1.5
billion of escrow accounts and other assets, respectively. |
(d) |
|
Represents both loans on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and loans that have been
securitized, but excludes loans for which the Firms only continuing involvement is servicing
of the assets. |
(e) |
|
Includes securitized loans that were previously recorded at fair value and classified as
trading assets. |
(f) |
|
For 2008, the policy for classifying subprime mortgage and home equity loans as nonperforming
was changed to conform to all the other home lending products. Prior period nonperforming
assets have been revised to conform to this change. |
129
|
|
|
(g) |
|
Excludes purchased
held-for-sale loans and approximately $6.4 billion of consumer
loans acquired as part of the Washington Mutual transaction that were
nonperforming prior to the transaction closing. The loans acquired
from Washington Mutual are considered to be credit impaired and,
therefore, are accounted for under SOP 03-3. For additional
information, see Note 13 on pages 120-122 of this Form 10-Q. |
(h) |
|
Excludes nonperforming assets related to (i) loans eligible for repurchase as well as loans
repurchased from GNMA pools that are insured by U.S. government agencies of $1.8 billion and
$1.5 billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively, and (ii) education
loans that are 90 days past due and still accruing, which are insured by U.S. government
agencies under the Federal Family Education Loan Program of $405 million and $279 million at
September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. These amounts for GNMA and education
loans are excluded, as reimbursement is proceeding normally. |
(i) |
|
Includes nonperforming loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value of $32 million and $50
million at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
Subprime adjustable-rate mortgage loan modifications
In December 2007, the American Securitization Forum (ASF) issued the Streamlined
Foreclosure and Loss Avoidance Framework for Securitized Subprime Adjustable Rate Mortgage Loans
(the Framework). For a further discussion of the ASF Framework, see Note 16 on page 145 of
JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
JPMorgan Chase has adopted the loss mitigation approaches under the Framework for securitized
subprime mortgage loans that meet the specific Segment 2 screening criteria, and began modifying
Segment 2 loans during the first quarter of 2008. The adoption of the Framework did not affect the
off-balance sheet accounting treatment of JPMorgan Chase-sponsored QSPEs that hold Segment 2
subprime loans.
The total amount of assets owned by Firm-sponsored QSPEs that hold ASF Framework Loans (including
those loans that are not serviced by the Firm) as of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
were as follows including the impact of the Washington Mutual acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third-party |
|
$ |
49,847 |
|
|
$ |
19,636 |
|
Retained interest |
|
|
183 |
|
|
|
412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
50,030 |
|
|
$ |
20,048 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of the
amounts presented above, $15.4 billion and $9.7 billion, respectively, are related to
ASF Framework Loans serviced by the Firm. The following table presents the portion of ASF
Framework Loans, serviced by the Firm, that are owned by Firm-sponsored QSPEs that fell within
Segments 1, 2 and 3 as of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment 1 |
|
$ |
4,431 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
$ |
1,940 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
Segment 2 |
|
|
2,850 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
970 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Segment 3 |
|
|
8,146 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
6,790 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
15,427 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
$ |
9,700 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimates of segment classification could change substantially as a result of
unanticipated changes in housing values, economic conditions, borrower/investor behavior and other
factors.
Included within the assets owned by the Firm-sponsored QSPEs was repossessed real estate owned, for
which JPMorgan Chase is the servicer, in the amount of $4.3 billion and $637 million at September
30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. The growth in real estate owned in the third quarter
of 2008 is attributable to the Washington Mutual transaction and increased foreclosures resulting
from current housing market conditions.
For those ASF Framework Loans serviced by the Firm and owned by Firm-sponsored QSPEs, the Firm
modified $155 million and $991 million, respectively, of Segment 2 subprime mortgages during the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2008. For Segment 3 loans, an appropriate loss mitigation
approach that is intended to maximize the recoveries to the securitization trust is chosen without
employing the fast track modifications prescribed for Segment 2 subprime mortgages. The loss
mitigation approach chosen by JPMorgan Chase is consistent with the applicable servicing agreements
and could include rate reductions, principal forgiveness, forbearance and other actions intended to
minimize the economic loss and to avoid foreclosure. The table below presents selected information
relating to Segment 3 loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
(in millions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan modifications |
|
$ |
719 |
|
|
$ |
1,243 |
|
Other loss mitigation activities |
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
599 |
|
Prepayments |
|
|
109 |
|
|
|
185 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impact of loss mitigation efforts on the fair value of the Firms retained interests in
ASF Framework loans was not material at September 30, 2008.
130
NOTE 17 VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
Refer to Note 1 on page 108 and Note 17 on page 146 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report for
a further description of JPMorgan Chases policies regarding consolidation of variable interest
entities and the Firms principal involvement with variable interest entities (VIEs).
Multi-seller conduits
The following table summarizes the Firms involvement with nonconsolidated Firm-administered,
multi-seller conduits. There were no consolidated Firm-administered, multi-seller conduits as of
September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in billions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets held by conduits |
|
$ |
43.1 |
|
|
$ |
61.2 |
|
Total commercial paper issued by conduits |
|
|
43.4 |
|
|
|
62.6 |
|
Liquidity and credit enhancements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deal-specific liquidity facilities
(Asset purchase agreements) |
|
|
59.2 |
|
|
|
87.3 |
|
Program-wide liquidity facilities |
|
|
17.0 |
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
Program-wide limited credit enhancements |
|
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
2.5 |
|
Maximum exposure to loss(a) |
|
|
60.8 |
|
|
|
88.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The Firms maximum exposure to loss is limited to the amount of drawn commitments (i.e.,
sellers assets held by the multi-seller conduits for which the Firm provides liquidity
support) of $43.1 billion and $61.2 billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
respectively, plus contractual but undrawn commitments of $17.7 billion and $27.7 billion at
September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. Since the Firm provides credit
enhancement and liquidity to Firm-administered, multi-seller conduits, the maximum exposure is
not adjusted to exclude exposure that would be absorbed by third-party liquidity providers. |
Assets funded by the multi-seller conduits
JPMorgan Chases administered multi-seller conduits fund a variety of asset types for the Firms
clients. Asset types primarily include credit card receivables, auto loans and leases, trade
receivables, education loans, commercial loans, residential mortgages, capital commitments (e.g.,
loans to private equity, mezzanine and real estate opportunity funds secured by capital commitments
of highly rated institutional investors), and various other asset types. It is the Firms intention
that the assets funded by its administered multi-seller conduits be sourced only from the Firms
clients and not be originated by, or transferred from, JPMorgan Chase.
The following table presents information on the commitments and assets held by JPMorgan Chases
administered multi-seller conduits as of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Liquidity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial |
|
|
Liquidity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unfunded |
|
|
paper |
|
|
provided |
|
|
Liquidity |
|
|
Unfunded |
|
|
paper |
|
|
provided |
|
|
Liquidity |
|
|
|
commitments |
|
|
funded |
|
|
by third |
|
|
provided by |
|
|
commitments |
|
|
funded |
|
|
by third |
|
|
provided |
|
(in billions) |
|
to Firm's clients |
|
|
assets |
|
|
parties |
|
|
Firm |
|
|
to Firm's clients |
|
|
assets |
|
|
parties |
|
|
by Firm |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset types: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card |
|
$ |
3.4 |
|
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
12.1 |
|
|
$ |
3.3 |
|
|
$ |
14.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
17.5 |
|
Automobile |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.3 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.7 |
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11.2 |
|
|
|
6.0 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.6 |
|
Education loans |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
5.9 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
7.8 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
Capital commitments |
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
5.2 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
Other |
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
17.7 |
|
|
$ |
43.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
59.2 |
|
|
$ |
27.7 |
|
|
$ |
61.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.6 |
|
|
$ |
87.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratings profile of VIE assets(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment-grade |
|
Noninvestment-grade |
|
|
|
|
|
Wt. avg. |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded |
|
|
expected life |
|
(in billions) |
|
AAA to AAA- |
|
|
AA+ to AA- |
|
|
A+ to A- |
|
|
BBB- |
|
|
BB+ and below |
|
|
assets |
|
|
(years)(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset types: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card |
|
$ |
3.8 |
|
|
$ |
4.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8.9 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Automobile |
|
|
2.5 |
|
|
|
3.3 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
Education loans |
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.8 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
3.0 |
|
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
Capital commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Other |
|
|
1.1 |
|
|
|
3.6 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.6 |
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11.6 |
|
|
$ |
26.3 |
|
|
$ |
4.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
43.1 |
|
|
|
1.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratings profile of VIE assets(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment-grade |
|
Noninvestment-grade |
|
|
|
|
|
Wt. avg. |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB to |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded |
|
|
expected life |
|
(in billions) |
|
AAA to AAA- |
|
|
AA+ to AA- |
|
|
A+ to A- |
|
|
BBB- |
|
|
BB+ and below |
|
|
assets |
|
|
(years)(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset types: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit card |
|
$ |
4.2 |
|
|
$ |
9.4 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
14.2 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Automobile |
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
6.9 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
|
|
2.3 |
|
Trade receivables |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
1.3 |
|
Education loans |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.2 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
Commercial |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
2.6 |
|
Residential mortgage |
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Capital commitments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
Other |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
4.6 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
11.0 |
|
|
$ |
43.8 |
|
|
$ |
5.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
61.2 |
|
|
|
1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The ratings scale is presented on an S&P equivalent basis. |
(b) |
|
Weighted average expected life for each asset type is based upon the remaining term of each
conduit transactions committed liquidity plus either the expected weighted average life of
the assets should the committed liquidity expire without renewal, or the expected time to sell
the underlying assets in the securitization market. |
The assets held by the multi-seller conduits are structured so that if they were rated, the
Firm believes the majority of them would receive an A rating or better by external rating
agencies. However, it is unusual for the assets held by the conduits to be explicitly rated by an
external rating agency. Instead, the Firms Credit Risk group assigns each asset purchase liquidity
facility an internal risk-rating based upon its assessment of the probability of default for the
transaction. The ratings provided in the above table reflect the S&P-equivalent ratings of the
internal rating grades assigned by the Firm.
The risk ratings are periodically reassessed as information becomes available. As of September 30,
2008, 92% of the assets in the conduits were risk rated A or better.
Commercial paper issued by the multi-seller conduits
The weighted average life of commercial paper issued by the multi-seller conduits was 18 days at
September 30, 2008, compared with 21 days at December 31, 2007, and the average yield on the
commercial paper was 3.0% at September 30, 2008, compared with 5.7% at December 31, 2007.
In the normal course of business, JPMorgan Chase trades and invests in commercial paper, including
paper issued by the Firm-administered conduits. The percentage of commercial paper purchased by the
Firm across all Firm-administered conduits during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, ranged
from less than 1% to 12.1% on any given day. The largest daily amount held by the Firm in any one
multi-seller conduit during the nine months ended September 30, 2008, was approximately $2.5
billion, or 21.3%, of the conduits commercial paper outstanding. Total commercial paper held by
the Firm at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, was $2.8 billion and $131 million,
respectively.
In
addition, beginning September 19, 2008, with the Federal Reserves establishment of the AML
Facility, JPMorgan Chase purchased high
quality asset-backed commercial paper from eligible U.S. money market
mutual funds and used the commercial paper purchased to secure
nonrecourse advances received from the FRBB. Commercial
paper purchased through the AML Facility may include paper issued by the Firm-administered conduits.
However, the Firm does not bear any credit or market risk related to the commercial paper held
under the AML Facility and is not assessed any regulatory capital. Commercial paper
purchased and held through the AML Facility by the Firm at September
30, 2008, totaled $2.8 billion.
132
The Firm is not obligated under any agreement (contractual or noncontractual) to purchase the
commercial paper issued by JPMorgan Chase-administered conduits.
Consolidated sensitivity analysis on capital
It is possible that the Firm could be required to consolidate a VIE if it were determined that the
Firm became the primary beneficiary of the VIE under the provisions of FIN 46R. The factors
involved in making the determination of whether or not a VIE should be consolidated are discussed
in Note 1 on page 108 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
The table below shows the impact on the Firms reported assets, liabilities, net income, Tier 1
capital ratio and Tier 1 leverage ratio if the Firm were required to consolidate all of the
multi-seller conduits that it administers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or for the period ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in billions, except ratios) |
|
Reported |
|
|
Pro forma(a)(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
$ |
2,251.5 |
|
|
$ |
2,294.5 |
|
Liabilities |
|
|
2,105.6 |
|
|
|
2,149.1 |
|
Net income for nine months |
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Tier 1 capital ratio |
|
|
8.9 |
% |
|
|
8.8 |
% |
Tier 1 leverage ratio |
|
|
7.2 |
|
|
|
7.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The fair value of the assets is primarily based upon pricing for comparable transactions.
The fair value of these assets could change significantly because the pricing of conduit
transactions is renegotiated with the client, generally, on an annual basis and due to changes
in current market conditions. |
(b) |
|
Consolidation is assumed to occur on the first day of the quarter, at the quarter-end levels,
in order to provide a meaningful adjustment to average assets in the denominator of the
leverage ratio. |
The Firm could fund purchases of assets from VIEs should it become necessary.
Investor intermediation
Municipal bond vehicles
Exposure to nonconsolidated municipal bond VIEs at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
including the ratings profile of the VIEs assets, were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of assets held |
|
|
Liquidity |
|
|
Excess/ |
|
|
Total |
|
|
of assets held by |
|
|
Liquidity |
|
|
Excess/ |
|
|
Total |
|
(in billions) |
|
by VIEs |
|
|
facilities(d) |
|
|
(deficit)(e) |
|
|
exposure |
|
|
VIEs |
|
|
facilities(d) |
|
|
(deficit)(e) |
|
|
exposure |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonconsolidated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bond
vehicles(a)(b)(c) |
|
$ |
13.2 |
|
|
$ |
10.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.6 |
|
|
$ |
10.6 |
|
|
$ |
19.2 |
|
|
$ |
18.1 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
18.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratings profile of VIE assets(f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment-grade |
|
Noninvestment-grade |
|
|
Fair value of |
|
|
Wt. avg. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB to |
|
|
|
|
|
assets held |
|
|
expected life |
|
(in billions) |
|
AAA to AAA- |
|
|
AA+ to AA- |
|
|
A+ to A- |
|
|
BBB- |
|
|
BB+ and below |
|
|
by VIEs |
|
|
(years) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonconsolidated
municipal bond
vehicles(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
6.2 |
|
|
$ |
6.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
13.2 |
|
|
|
22.1 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
14.6 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19.2 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excluded $5.9 billion and $6.9 billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
respectively, which were consolidated due to the Firm owning the residual interests. |
(b) |
|
Certain of the municipal bond vehicles are structured to meet the definition of a QSPE (as
discussed in Note 1 on page 108 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report); accordingly, the
assets and liabilities of QSPEs are not reflected in the Firms Consolidated Balance Sheets
(except for retained interests that are reported at fair value). Excluded nonconsolidated
amounts of $4.2 billion and $7.1 billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
respectively, related to QSPE municipal bond vehicles in which the Firm owned the residual
interests. |
(c) |
|
The decline in balances at September 30, 2008, compared with December 31, 2007, was due to
third-party residual interest holders exercising their right to terminate the municipal bond
vehicles. The proceeds from the sales of municipal bonds were sufficient to repay the putable
floating-rate certificates and the Firm did not incur losses as a result of these
terminations. |
(d) |
|
The Firm may serve as credit enhancement provider in municipal bond vehicles in which it
serves as liquidity provider. The Firm provided insurance on underlying municipal bonds in the
form of letters of credit in the amount of $23 million and $103 million at September 30, 2008,
and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(e) |
|
Represents the excess (deficit) of municipal bond asset fair value available to repay the
liquidity facilities if drawn. |
(f) |
|
The ratings scale is presented on an S&P equivalent basis. |
133
At September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, the Firm held $1.7 billion and $617 million,
respectively, of putable floating-rate certificates on its Consolidated Balance Sheets. The largest
amount held by the Firm at any time during the first nine months of 2008 was $2.2 billion, or
11.3%, of the municipal bond vehicles outstanding putable floating-rate certificates.
At both September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, 99% of the municipal bonds held by vehicles to
which the Firm served as liquidity provider were rated AA- or better, based upon either the
rating of the underlying municipal bond itself, or the rating including any credit enhancement. At
September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, $4.6 billion and $12.0 billion, respectively, of the
bonds were insured by monoline bond insurers. During the first nine months of 2008 and full-year
2007, the Firm did not experience a draw on the liquidity facilities. In addition, the municipal
bond vehicles did not experience any bankruptcy or downgrade termination events during the first
nine months of 2008 and full-year 2007.
The Firm sometimes invests in the residual interests of municipal bond vehicles. For VIEs in which
the Firm owns the residual interests, the Firm consolidates the VIEs. The likelihood that the Firm
would have to consolidate VIEs where the Firm does not own the residual interests and that are
currently off-balance sheet is remote.
Credit-linked note vehicles
Exposure to nonconsolidated credit-linked note VIEs at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
was as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par value of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Par value of |
|
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Trading |
|
|
Total |
|
|
collateral |
|
|
Derivative |
|
|
Trading |
|
|
Total |
|
|
collateral held by |
|
(in billions) |
|
receivables |
|
|
assets(c) |
|
|
exposure(d) |
|
|
held by VIEs |
|
|
receivables |
|
|
assets(c) |
|
|
exposure(d) |
|
|
VIEs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit linked notes(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Static structure |
|
$ |
2.8 |
|
|
$ |
1.1 |
|
|
$ |
3.9 |
|
|
$ |
15.9 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
$ |
0.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
13.5 |
|
Managed structure(b) |
|
|
5.8 |
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
|
6.2 |
|
|
|
16.2 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
8.6 |
|
|
$ |
1.5 |
|
|
$ |
10.1 |
|
|
$ |
32.1 |
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
1.3 |
|
|
$ |
6.6 |
|
|
$ |
26.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excluded fair value of collateral of $2.5 billion at both September 30, 2008, and December
31, 2007, which was consolidated. |
(b) |
|
Includes synthetic collateralized debt obligation vehicles, which have similar risk
characteristics to managed credit-linked note vehicles. At September 30, 2008, and December
31, 2007, trading assets included $14 million and $291 million, respectively, of transactions
with subprime collateral. |
(c) |
|
Trading assets principally comprise notes issued by VIEs, which from time to time are held as
part of the termination of a deal or to support limited market-making. |
(d) |
|
On-balance sheet exposure that includes derivative receivables and trading assets. |
Collateralized Debt Obligations vehicles
Exposures to collateralized debt obligation (CDO) warehouse VIEs at September 30, 2008, and
December 31, 2007, were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unfunded |
|
|
Total |
|
(in billions) |
|
Funded loans |
|
|
commitments(a) |
|
|
exposure(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDO warehouse VIEs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.5 |
|
Nonconsolidated |
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
0.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.2 |
|
|
$ |
1.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unfunded |
|
|
Total |
|
(in billions) |
|
Funded loans |
|
|
commitments(a) |
|
|
exposure(b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDO warehouse VIEs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated |
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
1.9 |
|
|
$ |
4.3 |
|
Nonconsolidated |
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
5.1 |
|
|
$ |
5.3 |
|
|
$ |
10.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ratings profile of VIE assets(c) |
|
|
|
|
|
Investment-grade |
|
Noninvestment-grade |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB to |
|
|
|
|
|
Funded |
|
(in billions) |
|
AAA to AAA- |
|
|
AA+ to AA- |
|
|
A+ to A- |
|
|
BBB- |
|
|
BB+ and below |
|
|
loans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonconsolidated CDO
warehouse VIEs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
|
$ |
0.7 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
2.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Typically contingent upon certain asset-quality conditions being met by asset managers. |
(b) |
|
The aggregate of the fair value of loan exposure and any unfunded contractually committed
financing. |
(c) |
|
The ratings scale is based upon JPMorgan Chases internal risk ratings and is presented on an
S&P equivalent basis. |
134
In addition to the CDO warehouse exposure noted above, at September 30, 2008, the Firm had no
consolidated CDO vehicles, as it did not own a majority of the equity interest in such vehicles.
The Firm also owned less than majority equity interests in several CDO vehicles for which the Firm
was not the primary beneficiary and, therefore, did not consolidate the entities. The fair value of
these interests was $2 million at September 30, 2008. These nonconsolidated CDO vehicles had total
assets of approximately $1.5 billion at September 30, 2008, all of which were noninvestment-grade.
Other significant interests in VIEs
In conjunction with the Bear Stearns merger, in June 2008, the FRBNY took control, through an LLC
formed for this purpose, of a portfolio of $30 billion in assets, based upon the value of the
portfolio as of March 14, 2008. The assets of the LLC were funded by a $28.85 billion, term loan
from the FRBNY, and a $1.15 billion, subordinated loan from JPMorgan Chase. The JPMorgan Chase loan
is subordinated to the FRBNY loan and will bear the first $1.15 billion of any losses of the
portfolio. Any remaining assets in the portfolio after repayment of the FRBNY loan, the JPMorgan
Chase loan and the expense of the LLC, will be for the account of the FRBNY.
Consolidated VIE assets
The following table summarizes the Firms total consolidated VIE assets, by classification, on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets, as of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in billions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated VIE assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets(a) |
|
$ |
12.0 |
|
|
$ |
14.4 |
|
Loans(b) |
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets |
|
$ |
18.2 |
|
|
$ |
19.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included the fair value of securities and derivative receivables and mortgage
securitizations that do not meet the criteria for sales accounting treatment under SFAS 140. |
(b) |
|
Included education securitizations that do not meet the criteria for sales accounting
treatment under SFAS 140. |
The interest-bearing beneficial interest liabilities issued by consolidated VIEs are
classified in the line item titled, Beneficial interests issued by consolidated variable interest
entities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The holders of these beneficial interests do not have
recourse to the general credit of JPMorgan Chase. See Note 21 on page 159 of JPMorgan Chases 2007
Annual Report for the maturity profile of FIN 46R long-term beneficial interests.
NOTE 18 GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
For a discussion of accounting policies related to goodwill and other intangible assets, see Note
18 on pages 154157 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
Goodwill and other intangible assets consist of the following.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
$ |
46,121 |
|
|
$ |
45,270 |
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
17,048 |
|
|
|
8,632 |
|
Purchased credit card relationships |
|
|
1,827 |
|
|
|
2,303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other intangibles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other credit card-related intangibles |
|
$ |
310 |
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
Core deposit intangibles |
|
|
1,710 |
|
|
|
2,067 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
|
1,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total all other intangible assets |
|
$ |
3,653 |
|
|
$ |
3,796 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
The $851 million increase in goodwill from December 31, 2007, largely resulted from the purchase of
an additional equity interest in Highbridge, tax-related purchase accounting adjustments associated
with the Bank One merger and the merger with Bear Stearns. For additional information, see Note 2
on pages 9398 of this Form 10-Q.
Goodwill was not impaired at September 30, 2008, or December 31, 2007, nor was any goodwill written
off due to impairment during either the nine months ended September 30, 2008 or 2007.
135
Goodwill attributed to the business segments was as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Bank |
|
$ |
4,043 |
|
|
$ |
3,578 |
|
Retail Financial Services |
|
|
16,828 |
|
|
|
16,848 |
|
Card Services |
|
|
12,816 |
|
|
|
12,810 |
|
Commercial Banking |
|
|
2,870 |
|
|
|
2,873 |
|
Treasury & Securities Services |
|
|
1,637 |
|
|
|
1,660 |
|
Asset Management |
|
|
7,550 |
|
|
|
7,124 |
|
Corporate/Private Equity |
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
377 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total goodwill |
|
$ |
46,121 |
|
|
$ |
45,270 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights
For a further description of the MSR asset, interest rate risk management, and valuation
methodology of MSRs, see Notes 4 and 18 on pages 113 and 154157 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual
Report, respectively. The fair value of MSRs is sensitive to changes in interest rates, including
their effect on prepayment speeds. JPMorgan Chase uses a combination of derivatives and trading
instruments to manage changes in the fair value of MSRs. The intent is to offset any changes in the
fair value of MSRs with changes in the fair value of the related risk management instruments. MSRs
decrease in value when interest rates decline. Conversely, securities (such as mortgage-backed
securities), principal-only certificates and certain derivatives (when the Firm receives fixed-rate
interest payments) increase in value when interest rates decline.
The following tables summarize MSR activity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008
and 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at the beginning of the period |
|
$ |
11,617 |
|
|
$ |
9,499 |
|
|
$ |
8,632 |
|
|
$ |
7,546 |
|
Originations of MSRs |
|
|
763 |
|
|
|
512 |
|
|
|
2,685 |
|
|
|
1,780 |
|
Purchases of MSRs |
|
|
5,893 |
(d) |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
6,903 |
(e) |
|
|
676 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total additions |
|
|
6,656 |
|
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
9,588 |
|
|
|
2,456 |
|
|
Change in valuation due to inputs and assumptions(a)(b) |
|
|
(797 |
) |
|
|
(810 |
) |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
250 |
|
Other changes in fair value(b)(c) |
|
|
(428 |
) |
|
|
(377 |
) |
|
|
(1,259 |
) |
|
|
(1,138 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total change in fair value |
|
|
(1,225 |
) |
|
|
(1,187 |
) |
|
|
(1,172 |
) |
|
|
(888 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at September 30 |
|
$ |
17,048 |
|
|
$ |
9,114 |
|
|
$ |
17,048 |
|
|
$ |
9,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gains (losses) included in income
related to MSRs held at September 30 |
|
$ |
(797 |
) |
|
$ |
(810 |
) |
|
$ |
87 |
|
|
$ |
250 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contractual service fees, late fees and other ancillary fees
included in income(b) |
|
$ |
762 |
|
|
$ |
579 |
|
|
$ |
2,074 |
|
|
$ |
1,694 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents MSR asset fair value adjustments due to changes in inputs, such as interest
rates and volatility, as well as updates to assumptions used in the valuation model. This
caption also represents total realized and unrealized gains (losses) included in net income
per the SFAS 157 disclosure for fair value measurement using significant unobservable inputs
(level 3). |
(b) |
|
RFS records changes in fair value of its MSR asset and any related servicing fees in mortgage
fees and related income. The IB records changes in fair value of its MSR asset and any related
servicing fees in principal transactions. |
(c) |
|
Includes changes in the MSR value due to modeled servicing portfolio runoff (or time decay).
This caption represents the impact of cash settlements per the SFAS 157 disclosure for fair
value measurement using significant unobservable inputs (level 3). |
(d) |
|
Includes MSRs acquired as a result of the Washington Mutual transaction. For further
discussion, see Note 2 on pages 9398 of this Form 10-Q. |
(e) |
|
Includes MSRs acquired as a result of the Washington Mutual transaction and Bear Stearns
merger. For further discussion, see Note 2 on pages 9398 of this Form 10-Q. |
The table below outlines the key economic assumptions used to determine the fair value of the
Firms MSRs at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively; and it outlines the
sensitivities of those fair values to immediate 10% and 20% adverse changes in those assumptions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except rates and where otherwise noted) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average prepayment speed assumption (CPR) |
|
|
12.06 |
% |
|
|
12.49 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(881 |
) |
|
$ |
(481 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(1,678 |
) |
|
|
(926 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average discount rate |
|
|
12.15 |
% |
|
|
10.53 |
% |
Impact on fair value of 10% adverse change |
|
$ |
(741 |
) |
|
$ |
(345 |
) |
Impact on fair value of 20% adverse change |
|
|
(1,419 |
) |
|
|
(664 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third-party mortgage loans serviced (in billions) |
|
$ |
1,219.6 |
|
|
$ |
614.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPR: Constant prepayment rate
136
The sensitivity analysis in the preceding table is hypothetical and should be used with
caution. Changes in fair value based upon a 10% and 20% variation in assumptions generally cannot
be easily extrapolated because the relationship of the change in the assumptions to the change in
fair value may not be linear. Also, in this table, the effect that a change in a particular
assumption may have on the fair value is calculated without changing any other assumption. In
reality, changes in one factor may result in changes in another, which might magnify or counteract
the sensitivities.
Purchased credit card relationships and all other intangible assets
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, purchased credit card relationships, other credit
card-related intangibles and core deposit intangibles decreased $869 million, predominantly as a
result of amortization expense. Other intangibles (net of amortization) increased $250 million,
primarily as a result of the purchase of an additional equity interest in Highbridge as well as the
acquisition of an institutional global custody portfolio.
Except for $517 million of indefinite-lived intangibles related to asset management advisory
contracts which are not amortized, but instead are tested for impairment at least annually, the
remainder of the Firms other acquired intangible assets are subject to amortization.
The components of credit card relationships, core deposits and other intangible assets were as
follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net |
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
carrying |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
carrying |
|
(in millions) |
|
amount |
|
|
amortization |
|
|
value |
|
|
amount |
|
|
amortization |
|
|
value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased credit card relationships |
|
$ |
5,784 |
|
|
$ |
3,957 |
|
|
$ |
1,827 |
|
|
$ |
5,794 |
|
|
$ |
3,491 |
|
|
$ |
2,303 |
|
All other intangibles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other credit card-related intangibles |
|
$ |
402 |
|
|
$ |
92 |
|
|
$ |
310 |
|
|
$ |
422 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
346 |
|
Core deposit intangibles |
|
|
4,279 |
|
|
|
2,569 |
|
|
|
1,710 |
|
|
|
4,281 |
|
|
|
2,214 |
|
|
|
2,067 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
2,380 |
|
|
|
747 |
(a) |
|
|
1,633 |
|
|
|
2,026 |
|
|
|
643 |
(a) |
|
|
1,383 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes amortization expense related to servicing assets on securitized automobile
loans, which is recorded in lending & deposit-related fees, of $1 million and $2 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, and $4 million and $7
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
Amortization expense
The following table presents amortization expense related to credit card relationships, core
deposits and all other intangible assets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased credit card relationships |
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
177 |
|
|
$ |
466 |
|
|
$ |
541 |
|
All other intangibles: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other credit card-related intangibles |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Core deposit intangibles |
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
Other intangibles |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
100 |
|
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization expense |
|
$ |
305 |
|
|
$ |
349 |
|
|
$ |
937 |
|
|
$ |
1,055 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents estimated future amortization expense related to credit card
relationships, core deposits and all other intangible assets at September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
Other credit |
|
|
Core |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
credit card |
|
|
card-related |
|
|
deposit |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
For the year: (in millions) |
|
relationships |
|
|
intangibles |
|
|
intangibles |
|
|
intangibles |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008(a) |
|
$ |
614 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
470 |
|
|
$ |
134 |
|
|
$ |
1,240 |
|
2009 |
|
|
435 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
390 |
|
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
976 |
|
2010 |
|
|
354 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
825 |
|
2011 |
|
|
290 |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
711 |
|
2012 |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
239 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
632 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes $466 million, $16 million, $355 million and $100 million of amortization expense
related to purchased credit card relationships, other credit card-related intangibles, core
deposit intangibles and other intangibles, respectively, recognized during the first nine
months of 2008. |
137
NOTE 19 DEPOSITS
At September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing deposits
were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing |
|
$ |
193,253 |
|
|
$ |
129,406 |
|
Interest-bearing (included $2,064 and $1,909 at fair value at
September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
|
506,974 |
|
|
|
376,194 |
|
Non-U.S. offices: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing |
|
|
9,747 |
|
|
|
6,342 |
|
Interest-bearing (included $3,974 and $4,480 at fair value at
September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively) |
|
|
259,809 |
|
|
|
228,786 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
969,783 |
|
|
$ |
740,728 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, time deposits in denominations of $100,000 or
more were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. |
|
$ |
156,412 |
|
|
$ |
134,529 |
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
66,096 |
|
|
|
69,171 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
222,508 |
|
|
$ |
203,700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The maturities of time deposits in each of the 12-month periods ending September 30, 2009,
2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 was as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 (in millions) |
|
U.S. |
|
|
Non-U.S. |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 |
|
$ |
214,769 |
|
|
$ |
76,924 |
|
|
$ |
291,693 |
|
2010 |
|
|
6,821 |
|
|
|
937 |
|
|
|
7,758 |
|
2011 |
|
|
4,787 |
|
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
5,828 |
|
2012 |
|
|
4,554 |
|
|
|
371 |
|
|
|
4,925 |
|
2013 |
|
|
1,616 |
|
|
|
443 |
|
|
|
2,059 |
|
After 5 years |
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
849 |
|
|
|
1,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
233,251 |
|
|
$ |
80,565 |
|
|
$ |
313,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 20 OTHER BORROWED FUNDS
Other borrowed funds consist of demand notes, term federal funds purchased and
various other borrowings. At September 30, 2008, JPMorgan Chase had no lines of credit for general
corporate purposes.
The following table details the components of other borrowed funds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances from Federal Home Loan Banks(a) |
|
$ |
80,567 |
|
|
$ |
450 |
|
Nonrecourse advances FRBB(b) |
|
|
61,321 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
25,939 |
|
|
|
28,385 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
167,827 |
|
|
$ |
28,835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Maturities of advances from the FHLBs were $48.2 billion, $28.1 billion, $2.6 billion,
and $0.7 billion in each of the 12-month periods ending September 30, 2009, 2010, 2011, and
2013, respectively, and $1.0 billion maturing after
September 30, 2013. Maturities for the 12 months period
ending September 30, 2012, were not material. |
(b) |
|
On September 19,
2008, the Federal Reserve established a special lending
facility, the AML Facility, to provide
liquidity to eligible MMMFs. The Firm is currently participating in the AML Facility. At
September 30, 2008, the ABCP investments were elected under the
fair value option and recorded in other assets; the corresponding
nonrecourse liability to the FRBB in the same amount was also
elected under the fair value option and was recorded in other
borrowed funds. |
138
NOTE 21 LONG-TERM DEBT
JPMorgan Chase issues long-term debt denominated in various currencies, although predominantly in
U.S. dollars, with both fixed and variable interest rates. The following table is a summary of
long-term debt carrying values (including unamortized original issue discount, SFAS 133 valuation
adjustments and fair value adjustments, where applicable) by contractual maturity for the current
year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
By remaining maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
Under |
|
|
|
|
|
|
After |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
|
|
|
|
1 year |
|
|
15 years |
|
|
5 years |
|
|
Total |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parent company |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior debt:(a) |
|
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
3,967 |
|
|
$ |
32,870 |
|
|
$ |
23,949 |
|
|
$ |
60,786 |
|
|
$ |
29,386 |
|
|
|
Variable rate |
|
|
17,248 |
|
|
|
35,285 |
|
|
|
10,180 |
|
|
|
62,713 |
|
|
|
47,546 |
|
|
|
Interest rates(b) |
|
|
0.75-7.21 |
% |
|
|
0.70-7.66 |
% |
|
|
1.40-8.16 |
% |
|
|
0.70-8.16 |
% |
|
|
0.75-7.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debt: |
|
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
3,471 |
|
|
$ |
8,575 |
|
|
$ |
15,868 |
|
|
$ |
27,914 |
|
|
$ |
27,761 |
|
|
|
Variable rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
1,765 |
|
|
|
1,799 |
|
|
|
1,888 |
|
|
|
Interest rates(b) |
|
|
5.75-9.88 |
% |
|
|
5.25-10.00 |
% |
|
|
1.92-9.88 |
% |
|
|
1.92-10.00 |
% |
|
|
1.92-10.00 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
$ |
24,686 |
|
|
$ |
76,764 |
|
|
$ |
51,762 |
|
|
$ |
153,212 |
|
|
$ |
106,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subsidiaries |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior debt:(a) |
|
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
981 |
|
|
$ |
4,403 |
|
|
$ |
3,342 |
|
|
$ |
8,726 |
|
|
$ |
6,406 |
|
|
|
Variable rate(c) |
|
|
8,356 |
|
|
|
37,453 |
|
|
|
20,767 |
|
|
|
66,576 |
|
|
|
60,556 |
|
|
|
Interest rates(b) |
|
|
2.92-4.84 |
% |
|
|
1.51-5.75 |
% |
|
|
1.94-14.21 |
% |
|
|
1.51-14.21 |
% |
|
|
3.70-14.21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordinated debt: |
|
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,220 |
|
|
$ |
8,370 |
|
|
$ |
9,169 |
|
|
|
Variable rate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
1,150 |
|
|
|
Interest rates(b) |
|
|
6.13 |
% |
|
|
|
% |
|
|
3.15-8.25 |
% |
|
|
3.15-8.25 |
% |
|
|
4.38-8.25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal |
|
$ |
9,487 |
|
|
$ |
41,856 |
|
|
$ |
33,479 |
|
|
$ |
84,822 |
|
|
$ |
77,281 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term
debt(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
34,173 |
|
|
$ |
118,620 |
|
|
$ |
85,241 |
|
|
$ |
238,034 |
(f)(g) (h) |
|
$ |
183,862 |
(h) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FIN 46 long-term
beneficial interests: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed rate |
|
$ |
24 |
|
|
$ |
537 |
|
|
$ |
107 |
|
|
$ |
668 |
|
|
$ |
701 |
|
|
|
Variable rate |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
1,409 |
|
|
|
4,006 |
|
|
|
5,443 |
|
|
|
6,508 |
|
|
|
Interest rates |
|
|
3.51-6.50 |
% |
|
|
3.05-8.75 |
% |
|
|
4.48-9.16 |
% |
|
|
3.05-9.16 |
% |
|
|
1.73-12.79 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total FIN 46 long-term
beneficial interests(e) |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
$ |
1,946 |
|
|
$ |
4,113 |
|
|
$ |
6,111 |
|
|
$ |
7,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included are various equity-linked or other indexed instruments. Embedded derivatives
separated from hybrid securities in accordance with SFAS 133 are reported at fair value and
shown net with the host contract on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Changes in fair value of
separated derivatives are recorded in principal transactions revenue. Hybrid securities which
the Firm has elected to measure at fair value are classified in the line item of the host
contract on the Consolidated Balance Sheets; changes in fair values are recorded in principal
transactions revenue in the Consolidated Statements of Income. |
(b) |
|
The interest rates shown are the range of contractual rates in effect at quarter-end,
including non-U.S. dollar-fixed- and variable-rate issuances, which excludes the effects of
the associated derivative instruments used in SFAS 133 hedge accounting relationships, if
applicable. The use of these derivative instruments modifies the Firms exposure to the
contractual interest rates disclosed in the table above. Including the effects of the SFAS 133
hedge accounting derivatives, the range of modified rates in effect at September 30, 2008, for
total long-term debt was 0.80% to 14.21%, versus the contractual range of 0.70% to 14.21%
presented in the table above. The interest rate ranges shown exclude structured notes
accounted for at fair value under SFAS 155 or SFAS 159. |
(c) |
|
Includes $7.8 billion principal amount of U.S. dollar-denominated floating rate mortgage
bonds issued to an unaffiliated statutory trust, which in turn issued 6.0 billion in covered
bonds secured by mortgage bonds. |
(d) |
|
Included $68.0 billion and $70.5 billion of outstanding structured notes accounted for at
fair value at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(e) |
|
Included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in beneficial interests issued by consolidated
VIEs. Also included $3.3 billion and $3.0 billion of outstanding structured notes accounted
for at fair value at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(f) |
|
At September 30, 2008, long-term debt aggregating $8.2 billion was redeemable at the option
of JPMorgan Chase, in whole or in part, prior to maturity, based upon the terms specified in
the respective notes. |
(g) |
|
The aggregate principal amount of debt that matures in each of the 12-month periods ending
September 30, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013 is $34.2 billion, $40.2 billion, $27.5 billion,
$28.4 billion and $22.6 billion, respectively. |
(h) |
|
Included $6.0 billion and $4.6 billion of outstanding zero-coupon notes at September 30,
2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. The aggregate principal amount of these notes at
their respective maturities was $10.7 billion and $7.7 billion, respectively. |
The weighted-average contractual interest rate for total long-term debt was 4.62% and 5.20% as
of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. In order to modify exposure to interest
rate and currency exchange rate movements, JPMorgan Chase utilizes derivative instruments,
primarily interest rate and cross-currency interest rate swaps, in conjunction with some of its
debt issues. The use of these instruments modifies the Firms interest expense on
139
the associated debt. The modified weighted-average interest rate for total long-term debt,
including the effects of related derivative instruments, was 4.17% and 5.13% as of September 30,
2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively.
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (Parent Company) has guaranteed certain debt of its subsidiaries, including
both long-term debt and structured notes sold as part of the Firms trading activities. These
guarantees rank on a parity with all of the Firms other unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness.
Guaranteed liabilities totaled $6.5 billion and $4.7 billion at September 30, 2008, and December
31, 2007, respectively. For
additional information, see Note 2 on pages 9398 of this Form 10-Q.
Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures held by trusts that issued guaranteed capital
debt securities
At September 30, 2008, the Firm had established 24 wholly-owned Delaware statutory business trusts
(issuer trusts) that had issued guaranteed capital debt securities.
The junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures issued by the Firm to the issuer trusts,
totaling $17.4 billion and $15.1 billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007,
respectively, were reflected in the Firms Consolidated Balance Sheets in the liabilities section
under the caption Junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures held by trusts that issued
guaranteed capital debt securities (i.e., trust preferred capital debt securities). The Firm also
records the common capital securities issued by the issuer trusts in other assets in its
Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007.
The debentures issued to the issuer trusts by the Firm, less the common capital securities of the
issuer trusts, qualify as Tier 1 capital. The following is a summary of the outstanding trust
preferred capital debt securities, including unamortized original issue discount, issued by each
trust and the junior subordinated deferrable interest debenture issued to each trust as of
September 30, 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of |
|
|
Principal |
|
|
|
|
Stated maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
capital debt |
|
|
amount of |
|
|
|
|
of capital |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
securities |
|
|
debenture |
|
|
|
|
securities |
|
Earliest |
|
Interest rate of |
|
Interest |
|
|
issued |
|
|
issued |
|
|
Issue |
|
and |
|
redemption |
|
capital securities |
|
payment/ |
September 30, 2008 (in millions) |
|
by trust(a) |
|
|
to trust(b) |
|
|
date |
|
debentures |
|
date |
|
and debentures |
|
distribution dates |
Bank One Capital III |
|
$ |
474 |
|
|
$ |
638 |
|
|
2000 |
|
2030 |
|
Any time |
|
8.75% |
|
Semiannually |
Bank One Capital VI |
|
|
525 |
|
|
|
554 |
|
|
2001 |
|
2031 |
|
Any time |
|
7.20% |
|
Quarterly |
Bear Stearns Capital Trust III |
|
|
263 |
|
|
|
262 |
|
|
2001 |
|
2031 |
|
Any time |
|
7.80% |
|
Quarterly |
Chase Capital II |
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
511 |
|
|
1997 |
|
2027 |
|
Any time |
|
LIBOR + 0.50% |
|
Quarterly |
Chase Capital III |
|
|
297 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
1997 |
|
2027 |
|
Any time |
|
LIBOR + 0.55% |
|
Quarterly |
Chase Capital VI |
|
|
249 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
1998 |
|
2028 |
|
Any time |
|
LIBOR + 0.625% |
|
Quarterly |
First Chicago NBD Capital I |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
256 |
|
|
1997 |
|
2027 |
|
Any time |
|
LIBOR + 0.55% |
|
Quarterly |
J.P. Morgan Chase Capital X |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,013 |
|
|
2002 |
|
2032 |
|
Any time |
|
7.00% |
|
Quarterly |
J.P. Morgan Chase Capital XI |
|
|
1,075 |
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
2003 |
|
2033 |
|
Any time |
|
5.88% |
|
Quarterly |
J.P. Morgan Chase Capital XII |
|
|
400 |
|
|
|
388 |
|
|
2003 |
|
2033 |
|
2008 |
|
6.25% |
|
Quarterly |
JPMorgan Chase Capital XIII |
|
|
472 |
|
|
|
487 |
|
|
2004 |
|
2034 |
|
2014 |
|
LIBOR + 0.95% |
|
Quarterly |
JPMorgan Chase Capital XIV |
|
|
600 |
|
|
|
582 |
|
|
2004 |
|
2034 |
|
2009 |
|
6.20% |
|
Quarterly |
JPMorgan Chase Capital XV |
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
1,070 |
|
|
2005 |
|
2035 |
|
Any time |
|
5.88% |
|
Semiannually |
JPMorgan Chase Capital XVI |
|
|
500 |
|
|
|
490 |
|
|
2005 |
|
2035 |
|
2010 |
|
6.35% |
|
Quarterly |
JPMorgan Chase Capital XVII |
|
|
496 |
|
|
|
495 |
|
|
2005 |
|
2035 |
|
Any time |
|
5.85% |
|
Semiannually |
JPMorgan Chase Capital XVIII |
|
|
748 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2036 |
|
Any time |
|
6.95% |
|
Semiannually |
JPMorgan Chase Capital XIX |
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
564 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2036 |
|
2011 |
|
6.63% |
|
Quarterly |
JPMorgan Chase Capital XX |
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
996 |
|
|
2006 |
|
2036 |
|
Any time |
|
6.55% |
|
Semiannually |
JPMorgan Chase Capital XXI |
|
|
845 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
2007 |
|
2037 |
|
2012 |
|
LIBOR + 0.95% |
|
Quarterly |
JPMorgan Chase Capital XXII |
|
|
996 |
|
|
|
997 |
|
|
2007 |
|
2037 |
|
Any time |
|
6.45% |
|
Semiannually |
JPMorgan Chase Capital XXIII |
|
|
746 |
|
|
|
746 |
|
|
2007 |
|
2047 |
|
2012 |
|
LIBOR + 1.00% |
|
Quarterly |
JPMorgan Chase Capital XXIV |
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
2007 |
|
2047 |
|
2012 |
|
6.88% |
|
Quarterly |
JPMorgan Chase Capital XXV |
|
|
1,491 |
|
|
|
1,683 |
|
|
2007 |
|
2037 |
|
2037 |
|
6.80% |
|
Semiannually |
JPMorgan Chase Capital XXVI |
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
|
1,815 |
|
|
2008 |
|
2048 |
|
2013 |
|
8.00% |
|
Quarterly |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
16,988 |
|
|
$ |
17,398 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents the amount of capital securities issued to the public by each trust, including
unamortized original issue discount. |
(b) |
|
Represents the principal amount of JPMorgan Chase debentures issued to each trust, including
unamortized original issue discount. The principal amount of debentures issued to the trusts
includes the impact of hedging and purchase accounting fair value adjustments that were
recorded on the Firms Consolidated Financial Statements. |
140
NOTE 22 PREFERRED STOCK
JPMorgan Chase is authorized to issue 200 million shares of preferred stock, in one or more series,
with a par value of $1 per share. On April 23, 2008, the Firm issued 600,000 shares of Fixed to
Floating Rate Noncumulative Preferred Stock, Series I (Series I). On July 15, 2008, each series
of Bear Stearns preferred stock issued and outstanding was exchanged into a series of JPMorgan
Chase preferred stock having substantially identical terms. Prior to the exchange the Bear Stearns
preferred stock then outstanding was reported as a minority interest
payable for the Firm; as a
result of the exchange into JPMorgan Chase preferred stock, these
preferred shares now rank pari passu with the other
series of the Firms preferred stock. On August 21, 2008, the Firm issued 180,000 shares of 8.625%
Noncumulative Preferred Stock, Series J (Series J). JPMorgan Chases preferred stock outstanding
takes precedence over the Firms common stock for the payment of dividends and the distribution of
assets in the event of a liquidation or dissolution of the Firm.
Generally,
dividends on shares of outstanding series of preferred stock are payable quarterly. Dividends on the
shares of Series I preferred stock are payable semiannually at a fixed rate of 7.90% through April
2018, and then become payable quarterly at three-month LIBOR plus 3.47%.
The following is a summary of JPMorgan Chases preferred stock outstanding as of September 30,
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at |
|
|
Earliest |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and redemption |
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
redemption |
|
|
Rate in effect at |
|
|
|
price per share(b) |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
(in millions) |
|
|
date |
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series E(a) |
|
$ |
200 |
|
|
|
818,113 |
|
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
Any time |
|
|
6.15 |
% |
Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series F(a) |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
428,825 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
Any time |
|
|
5.72 |
|
Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series G(a) |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
511,169 |
|
|
|
102 |
|
|
Any time |
|
|
5.49 |
|
Fixed to Floating Rate Noncumulative
Preferred Stock, Series I(a) |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
600,000 |
|
|
|
6,000 |
|
|
|
4/30/2018 |
|
|
|
7.90 |
|
Noncumulative Preferred Stock, Series J(a) |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
180,000 |
|
|
|
1,800 |
|
|
|
9/1/2013 |
|
|
|
8.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,538,107 |
|
|
$ |
8,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represented by depositary shares. |
(b) |
|
Redemption price includes amount shown in the table plus any accrued but unpaid dividends. |
Pursuant
to the U.S. Department of the Treasurys (the U.S.
Treasury) Capital Purchase Program (the Capital Purchase
Program),
on October 28, 2008, the Firm issued to the U.S. Treasury, in exchange for aggregate consideration
of $25.0 billion, (i) 2.5 million shares of the
Firms Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock,
Series K, par value $1 and liquidation preference $10,000 per
share (and $25.0 billion liquidation
preference in the aggregate) (the Series K Preferred Stock), and (ii) a warrant (the Warrant).
Dividends are payable quarterly on the Series K Preferred Stock at a fixed rate of 5% for the first five years, and a fixed rate of 9% thereafter. The Series K
Preferred Stock may be called or redeemed only under certain conditions. The Series K Preferred Stock is
nonvoting, qualifies as Tier 1 capital and ranks on parity with the Firms other series of
preferred stock.
Dividend restrictions
For as long as any shares of Series K Preferred Stock are outstanding, no dividends may be declared
or paid on junior preferred shares, preferred shares ranking pari passu with the Series K Preferred
Stock, or common stock (other than in the case of pari passu preferred shares, dividends on a pro
rata basis with the Series K Preferred Stock), unless all accrued and unpaid dividends for all past
dividend periods on the Series K Preferred Stock are fully paid. The U.S. Treasurys consent is
required for any increase in common dividends per share from the amount of the Firms quarterly
stock dividend of $0.38 per share, payable on October 31, 2008 until the third anniversary of the
purchase agreement with the U.S. Treasury unless prior to such third anniversary the
Series K Preferred Stock is redeemed in whole or the U.S. Treasury has transferred all of the
Series K Preferred Stock to third parties.
Stock repurchase restrictions
The Firm may not repurchase or redeem any junior preferred shares, preferred shares ranking pari
passu with the Series K Preferred Stock or common stock without the prior consent of the U.S.
Treasury (other than (i) repurchases of the Series K Preferred Stock and (ii) repurchases of junior
preferred shares or common stock in connection with any benefit
141
plan in the ordinary course of business consistent with past practice) until the third anniversary
of the purchase agreement with the U.S. Treasury unless prior to such third anniversary
the Series K Preferred Stock is redeemed in whole or the U.S. Treasury has transferred all of the
Series K Preferred Stock to third parties.
NOTE
23 COMMON STOCK
At September 30, 2008, JPMorgan Chase was authorized to issue 9.0 billion shares of common stock
with a $1 par value per share. On September 30, 2008, the Firm issued $11.5 billion of new shares
of common stock at $40.50 per share, representing 284 million shares.
Pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement dated March 24, 2008 between JPMorgan Chase and Bear
Stearns, 21 million newly issued shares of JPMorgan Chase common stock were issued to Bear Stearns
in a transaction that was exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, pursuant to
Section 4(2) thereof, in exchange for 95 million newly issued shares of Bear Stearns common stock
(or 39.5% of Bear Stearns common stock after giving effect to the issuance). Upon the consummation
of the Bear Stearns merger, on May 30, 2008, the 21 million shares of JPMorgan Chase common stock
and 95 million shares of Bear Stearns common stock were cancelled. For a further discussion of this
transaction, see Note 2 on pages 9598 of this Form 10-Q.
Common shares issued (newly issued or distributed from treasury) by JPMorgan Chase during the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued balance at January 1 |
|
|
3,657.7 |
|
|
|
3,657.8 |
|
Newly issued |
|
|
304.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cancelled shares |
|
|
(20.7 |
) |
|
|
(0.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total issued balance at September 30 |
|
|
3,941.6 |
|
|
|
3,657.7 |
|
Treasury balance at January 1 |
|
|
(290.3 |
) |
|
|
(196.1 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(164.6 |
) |
Share repurchases related to employee stock-based awards(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.7 |
) |
Issued from treasury: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change from the Bear Stearns merger as a result of the reissuance of treasury stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and the Share Exchange agreement |
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee benefits and compensation plans |
|
|
48.3 |
|
|
|
63.7 |
|
Employee stock purchase plans |
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total issued from treasury |
|
|
75.6 |
|
|
|
64.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total treasury balance at September 30 |
|
|
(214.7 |
) |
|
|
(298.9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding balance at September 30 |
|
|
3,726.9 |
|
|
|
3,358.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Participants in the Firms stock-based incentive plans may have shares withheld to cover
income taxes. The shares withheld amounted to 33 thousand and 2.7 million for 2008 and 2007,
respectively. |
Pursuant to the Capital Purchase Program, the Firm issued to the U.S. Treasury a Warrant to
purchase up to 88,401,697 shares of the Firms common stock at
an exercise price of $42.42 per share, subject to certain adjustments.
On April 17, 2007, the Firms Board of Directors approved a stock repurchase program that
authorizes the repurchase of up to $10.0 billion of the Firms common shares, which supersedes an
$8.0 billion stock repurchase program approved in 2006. The $10.0 billion authorization includes
shares to be repurchased to offset issuances under the Firms employee stock-based plans. The
actual number of shares repurchased is subject to various factors, including market conditions;
legal considerations affecting the amount and timing of repurchase activity; the Firms capital
position (taking into account goodwill and intangibles); internal capital generation and
alternative potential investment opportunities. The repurchase program does not include specific
price targets or timetables; may be executed through open market purchases or privately negotiated
transactions, or utilizing Rule 10b5-1 programs; and may be suspended at any time. During the nine
months ended September 30, 2008, the Firm did not repurchase any shares of common stock. During the
nine months ended September 30, 2007, the Firm repurchased 165 million shares of common stock under
stock repurchase programs approved by the Board of Directors. For a discussion of restrictions on
the Firms ability to pay dividends on, or repurchase, the Firms common stock, see Note 22 above.
142
NOTE 24 EARNINGS PER SHARE
For a discussion of the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS), see Note
24 on page 161 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report. The following table presents the
calculation of basic and diluted EPS for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and
2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except per share amounts) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain |
|
$ |
(54 |
) |
|
$ |
3,373 |
|
|
$ |
4,322 |
|
|
$ |
12,394 |
|
Extraordinary gain |
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
527 |
|
|
$ |
3,373 |
|
|
$ |
4,903 |
|
|
$ |
12,394 |
|
Less: Preferred stock dividends |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common stock |
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
$ |
3,373 |
|
|
$ |
4,652 |
|
|
$ |
12,394 |
|
Weighted-average basic shares outstanding |
|
|
3,445 |
|
|
|
3,376 |
|
|
|
3,422 |
|
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.19 |
|
|
$ |
3.63 |
|
Extraordinary gain |
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
$ |
3.63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income applicable to common stock |
|
$ |
366 |
|
|
$ |
3,373 |
|
|
$ |
4,652 |
|
|
$ |
12,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average basic shares outstanding |
|
|
3,445 |
|
|
|
3,376 |
|
|
|
3,422 |
|
|
|
3,416 |
|
Add: Employee restricted stock, RSUs, stock options and
SARs |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
|
102 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
104 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-average diluted shares outstanding(a) |
|
|
3,445 |
|
|
|
3,478 |
|
|
|
3,525 |
|
|
|
3,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain |
|
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
|
$ |
3.52 |
|
Extraordinary gain |
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share |
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
1.32 |
|
|
$ |
3.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Options issued under employee benefit plans to purchase 194 million and 147 million
shares of common stock were outstanding for the three months ended September 30, 2008 and
2007, respectively, and 178 million and 119 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, but were not included in the computation of diluted EPS
because the options were antidilutive. |
(b) |
|
Common equivalent shares have been excluded from the computation of diluted loss per
share for the three months ended September 30, 2008, as the effect would have been
antidilutive. |
NOTE 25 ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) includes the after-tax change in SFAS 115
unrealized gains and losses on AFS securities, SFAS 52 foreign currency translation adjustments
(including the impact of related derivatives), SFAS 133 cash flow hedging activities and SFAS
158 net loss and prior service cost (credit) related to the Firms defined benefit pension and
OPEB plans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss and prior |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
service costs |
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Translation |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
(credit) of defined |
|
|
Accumulated other |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
adjustments, |
|
|
flow |
|
|
benefit pension and |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
(in millions) |
|
on AFS securities(a) |
|
|
net of hedges |
|
|
hedges |
|
|
OPEB plans |
|
|
income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2008 |
|
$ |
380 |
|
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
(802 |
) |
|
$ |
(503 |
) |
|
$ |
(917 |
) |
Net change |
|
|
(1,601 |
)(b) |
|
|
5 |
(c) |
|
|
202 |
(d) |
|
|
84 |
(e) |
|
|
(1,310 |
) |
Balance at September 30,
2008 |
|
$ |
(1,221 |
) |
|
$ |
13 |
|
|
$ |
(600 |
) |
|
$ |
(419 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,227 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss and prior |
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Translation |
|
|
Cash |
|
|
service costs |
|
|
Accumulated other |
|
September 30, 2007 |
|
gains (losses) |
|
|
adjustments, |
|
|
flow |
|
|
(credit) of defined benefit |
|
|
comprehensive |
|
(in millions) |
|
on AFS securities(a) |
|
|
net of hedges |
|
|
hedges |
|
|
pension and OPEB plans |
|
|
income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 1, 2007 |
|
$ |
29 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
(489 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,102 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,557 |
) |
Cumulative effect of changes
in accounting principles
(SFAS 159) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
January 1, 2007, adjusted |
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
(489 |
) |
|
|
(1,102 |
) |
|
|
(1,558 |
) |
Net change |
|
|
(246 |
)(b) |
|
|
25 |
(c) |
|
|
(173 |
)(d) |
|
|
122 |
(e) |
|
|
(272 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at September 30,
2007 |
|
$ |
(218 |
) |
|
$ |
30 |
|
|
$ |
(662 |
) |
|
$ |
(980 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,830 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents the after-tax difference between the fair value and amortized cost of the AFS
securities portfolio and retained interests in securitizations recorded in other assets. |
143
|
|
|
(b) |
|
The net change for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, was due primarily to price
declines in asset-backed securities positions as a result of general
increases in market spreads, and to net increases in
interest rates and market spreads on agency mortgage-backed pass-through securities. The net
change for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, was due primarily to higher interest
rates. |
(c) |
|
September 30, 2008 and 2007, included $(470) million and $402 million, respectively, of
after-tax gains (losses) on foreign currency translation from operations for which the
functional currency is other than the U.S. dollar, partially offset by $475 million and $(377)
million, respectively, of after-tax gains (losses) on hedges. |
(d) |
|
The net change for the nine months ended September 30, 2008, included $218 million of
after-tax losses recognized in income and $16 million of after-tax losses representing the net
change in derivative fair value that was reported in comprehensive income. The net change for
the nine months ended September 30, 2007, included $147 million of after-tax losses recognized
in income and $320 million of after-tax losses representing the net change in derivative fair
value that was reported in comprehensive income. |
(e) |
|
The net change for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, was primarily due
to adjustments, net of tax, based upon the respective 2007 and 2006 final year-end actuarial
valuations for the U.S. and non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans and the respective 2008 and
2007 actuarial valuation for the U.S. OPEB plan, as well as the amortization of net loss and
prior service credit, net of tax, into net periodic benefit cost. |
NOTE 26 INCOME TAXES
For a discussion of income taxes, see Note 26 on pages 164-165 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual
Report.
JPMorgan Chases unrecognized tax benefits, the amount that would reduce the effective tax rate, if
recognized, and related accrued interest expense and penalties were as follows at September 30,
2008, and December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in billions) |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized tax benefits(a) |
|
$ |
6.3 |
|
|
$ |
4.8 |
|
Accrued income tax-related interest and penalties |
|
|
2.3 |
|
|
|
1.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included unrecognized tax benefits that would reduce the effective tax rate if recognized
of $2.7 billion at September 30, 2008, and $1.3 billion at December 31, 2007. |
The increase in unrecognized tax benefits and the amount that would reduce the effective tax
rate, if recognized, resulted predominantly from the merger with Bear Stearns in the second quarter
of 2008. The increase in accrued income tax-related interest and penalties reflects the Bear
Stearns merger and the continuing outstanding status of JPMorgan Chases unrecognized tax benefits.
As JPMorgan Chase is presently under audit by a number of tax authorities, it is reasonably
possible that unrecognized tax benefits could significantly change over the next 12 months, which
could also significantly impact JPMorgan Chases quarterly and annual effective tax rates.
The Firms income (loss) before income tax expense and extraordinary gain, income tax expense
(benefit) and effective tax rate were as follows for each of the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions, except rate) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense and
extraordinary gain |
|
$ |
(2,187 |
) |
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,115 |
|
|
$ |
18,683 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(2,133 |
) |
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
6,289 |
|
Effective income tax rate |
|
|
97.5 |
% |
|
|
32.5 |
% |
|
|
(5.0 |
)% |
|
|
33.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The change in the effective tax rate for the third quarter and first nine months of 2008,
compared with the same periods for 2007, was the result of lower reported pretax income combined
with an increased proportion of income that was not subject to U.S. federal income taxes, increased
tax credits, and the realization of a benefit from the release of deferred tax liabilities
associated with the undistributed earnings of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries that were deemed to be
reinvested indefinitely, which is discussed below.
JPMorgan Chase does not provide for U.S. federal income taxes on the undistributed earnings of
certain non-U.S. subsidiaries, to the extent that such earnings are reinvested abroad for an
indefinite period of time. During the third quarter of 2008, as part of JPMorgan Chases periodic
review of the business requirements and capital needs of its non-U.S. subsidiaries, combined with
the formation of specific strategies and steps taken to fulfill these requirements and needs, the
Firm determined that the undistributed earnings of certain of its subsidiaries, for which U.S.
federal income taxes had been provided, will remain indefinitely reinvested to fund the current and
future growth of the related businesses. As management does not intend to use the earnings of these
subsidiaries as a source of funding for its U.S. operations, such earnings will not be
distributed to the U.S. in the foreseeable future. This determination resulted in the release of
deferred tax liabilities and the recognition of an income tax benefit of $927 million associated
with these undistributed earnings. For the nine months ended September 30, 2008, pretax earnings of
approximately $2.1 billion were generated that will remain indefinitely invested in these
subsidiaries. At September 30, 2008, the cumulative amount of undistributed pretax earnings in
these subsidiaries approximated $12.5 billion. If the Firm were to record a deferred tax liability
associated with these undistributed earnings, the amount would be $2.6 billion at September 30,
2008.
144
NOTE 27 COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
For a discussion of the Firms potential liability related to The Bank of New York Mellon
Corporations (BNYM) difficulties in locating certain documentation, including IRS Forms W-8 and
W-9, related to certain accounts transferred to BNYM in connection with the Firms sale of its
corporate trust business, see Note 29 on page 167 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
Litigation reserve
While the outcome of litigation is inherently uncertain, management believes, in light of all
information known to it at September 30, 2008, the Firms litigation reserves were adequate at such
date. Management reviews litigation reserves periodically, and the reserves may be increased or
decreased in the future to reflect further relevant developments. The Firm believes it has
meritorious defenses to claims asserted against it in its currently outstanding litigation and,
with respect to such litigation, intends to continue to defend itself vigorously, litigating or
settling cases according to managements judgment as to what is in the best interests of
stockholders.
NOTE 28 ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES
The majority of JPMorgan Chases derivatives are entered into for trading purposes. Derivatives
are also utilized by the Firm as an end-user to hedge market exposures, to modify the interest
rate characteristics of related balance sheet instruments or to meet longer-term investment
objectives. Both trading and end-user derivatives are recorded in trading assets and trading
liabilities. The Firm did not expand or change its hedging strategies as a result of the Bear
Stearns merger and Washington Mutual transaction. For a further discussion of the Firms use of
and accounting policies regarding derivative instruments, see Note 30 on pages 168169 of
JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report. The following table presents derivative instrument
hedging-related activities for the periods indicated.
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value hedge ineffective net gains/(losses)(a) |
|
$ |
188 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
205 |
|
|
$ |
49 |
|
Cash flow hedge ineffective net gains/(losses)(a) |
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Cash flow hedging gains/(losses)
on forecasted
transactions that failed to occur |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes ineffectiveness and the components of hedging instruments that have been
excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. |
Over the next 12 months, it is expected that $301 million (after-tax) of net losses recorded
in other comprehensive income (loss) at September 30, 2008, will be recognized in earnings. The
maximum length of time over which forecasted transactions are hedged is 10 years, and such
transactions primarily relate to core lending and borrowing activities.
NOTE 29 OFF-BALANCE SHEET LENDING-RELATED FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS AND GUARANTEES
For a discussion of off-balance sheet lending-related financial instruments and guarantees, and the
Firms related accounting policies, see Note 31 on pages 170173 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual
Report. To provide for the risk of loss inherent in wholesale-related contracts, an allowance for
credit losses on lending-related commitments is maintained. See Note 14 on pages 123124 of this
Form 10-Q for a further discussion regarding the allowance for credit losses on lending-related
commitments.
The following table summarizes the contractual amounts of off-balance sheet lending-related
financial instruments and guarantees and the related allowance for credit losses on lending-related
commitments at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007.
Off-balance sheet lending-related financial instruments and guarantees
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for |
|
|
Contractual amount |
|
lending-related commitments |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lending-related |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer(a) |
|
$ |
910,908 |
|
|
$ |
815,936 |
|
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
15 |
|
Wholesale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other unfunded commitments to extend credit(b)(c)(d)(e) |
|
|
248,078 |
|
|
|
250,954 |
|
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
571 |
|
Asset purchase agreements(f) |
|
|
59,473 |
|
|
|
90,105 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
Standby letters of credit and guarantees(c)(g)(h) |
|
|
94,005 |
|
|
|
100,222 |
|
|
|
288 |
|
|
|
254 |
|
Other letters of credit(c) |
|
|
6,267 |
|
|
|
5,371 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total wholesale |
|
|
407,823 |
|
|
|
446,652 |
|
|
|
704 |
|
|
|
835 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total lending-related |
|
$ |
1,318,731 |
|
|
$ |
1,262,588 |
|
|
$ |
713 |
|
|
$ |
850 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other guarantees |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities lending guarantees(i) |
|
$ |
270,182 |
|
|
$ |
385,758 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
Derivatives qualifying as guarantees(j) |
|
|
102,810 |
|
|
|
85,262 |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
NA |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included credit card and
home equity lending-related commitments of $784.9 billion and
$97.1 billion, respectively, at September 30, 2008, and $714.8 billion and $74.2 billion,
respectively, at December 31, 2007. These amounts for credit card and home equity
lending-related commitments represent the total available credit for these products. The Firm
has not experienced, and does not anticipate, that all available lines of credit for these
products will be utilized at the same time. For credit card commitments and if certain
conditions are met for home equity commitments, the Firm can reduce or cancel these lines of
credit by providing the borrower prior notice or, in some cases, without notice as permitted
by law. |
(b) |
|
Included unused advised lines of credit totaling $34.2 billion at September 30, 2008, and
$38.4 billion at December 31, 2007, which are not legally binding. In regulatory filings with
the Federal Reserve, unused advised lines are not reportable. |
(c) |
|
Represents contractual amount net of risk participations totaling $29.2 billion and $28.3
billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(d) |
|
Excluded unfunded commitments to third-party private equity funds of $931 million and $881
million at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. Also excluded unfunded
commitments for other equity investments of $865 million and $903 million at September 30,
2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(e) |
|
Included in other unfunded commitments to extend credit are commitments to investment and
noninvestment grade counterparties in connection with leveraged acquisitions of $5.9 billion
and $8.2 billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(f) |
|
Largely represents asset purchase agreements to the Firms administered multi-seller,
asset-backed commercial paper conduits. It also includes $221 million and $1.1 billion of
asset purchase agreements to other third-party entities at September 30, 2008, and December
31, 2007, respectively. |
(g) |
|
JPMorgan Chase held collateral relating to $19.0 billion and $15.8 billion of these
arrangements at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(h) |
|
Included unused commitments to issue standby letters of credit of $40.9 billion and $50.7
billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(i) |
|
Collateral held by the Firm in support of securities lending indemnification agreements was
$275.0 billion at September 30, 2008, and $390.5 billion at December 31, 2007,
respectively. Securities lending collateral is comprised primarily of cash, Organisation
for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) government securities and U.S. agency
securities. |
(j) |
|
Represents notional amounts of derivatives qualifying as guarantees. |
146
Included in other unfunded commitments to extend credit are commitments to investment and
noninvestment grade counterparties in connection with leveraged acquisitions. These commitments are
dependent on whether the acquisition by the borrower is successful, tend to be short-term in nature
and, in most cases, are subject to certain conditions based upon the borrowers financial condition
or other factors. Additionally, the Firm often syndicates portions of the commitment to other
investors, depending on market conditions. These commitments often contain flexible pricing
features to adjust for changing market conditions prior to closing. Alternatively, the borrower may
turn to the capital markets for required funding instead of drawing on the commitment provided by
the Firm, and the commitment may expire unused. As such, these commitments are not necessarily
indicative of the Firms actual risk and the total commitment amount may not reflect actual future
cash flow requirements. The amount of commitments related to leveraged acquisitions at September
30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, were $5.9 billion and $8.2 billion, respectively.
For a further discussion of the off-balance sheet lending-related arrangements the Firm considers
to be guarantees under FIN 45, and the related accounting policies, see Note 31 on pages 170173
of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report. The amount of the liability related to FIN 45 guarantees
recorded at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, excluding the allowance for credit losses on
lending-related commitments and derivative contracts discussed below was $368 million and $335
million, respectively.
In addition to the contracts described above, there are certain derivative contracts to which the
Firm is a counterparty that meet the characteristics of a guarantee under FIN 45. For a discussion
of the derivatives the Firm considers to be guarantees, and the related accounting policies, see
Note 31 on pages 170173 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report. The total notional value of the
derivatives that the Firm deems to be guarantees was $102.8 billion and $85.3 billion at September
30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. The fair values related to these contracts were a
derivative receivables of $169 million and $213 million, and derivative payables of $5.8 billion
and $2.5 billion at September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively.
Auction rate securities
As part of a settlement in conjunction with investigations in certain states of auction rate
securities (ARS) activities, the Firm agreed with certain state
securities regulators to offer to purchase an estimated $3.0 billion in
ARS from certain customers. The difference between the aggregate purchase price and the
market value of the ARS to be purchased represents the Firms exposure to loss under the
agreements. The face amount of ARS to be purchased assuming a purchase price of par and market
value of zero represents the maximum potential amount of future payments under the agreements. The
Firm believes its exposure to pay this maximum potential amount, estimated to be $3.0 billion,
to be remote. Based on current market conditions, and on assumptions about the rate at which customers will tender securities, the Firms preliminary estimate of the difference
between the aggregate purchase price and market value of the ARS it will purchase under the program
is approximately $375 million on a pretax basis, which cost has been recognized in the third quarter of
2008. The actual difference between the aggregate purchase price and the market value may vary
significantly from this preliminary estimate and will depend on future market conditions and the
amount of ARS that are ultimately purchased.
Residual value guarantee
In connection with the Bear Stearns merger, the Firm succeeded to an operating lease arrangement
for the building located at 383 Madison Avenue in New York City (the Synthetic Lease). Under the
terms of the Synthetic Lease, the Firm is obligated to make periodic payments based upon the
lessors underlying interest costs. The Synthetic Lease expires on November 1, 2010. Under the
terms of the Synthetic Lease, the Firm has the right to purchase the building for the amount of the
then outstanding indebtedness of the lessor or to arrange for the sale of the building with the
proceeds of the sale to be used to satisfy the lessors debt obligation. If the sale does not
generate sufficient proceeds to satisfy the lessors debt obligation, the Firm is required to fund
the shortfall up to a maximum residual value guarantee. As of September 30, 2008, there was no
expected shortfall and the maximum residual value guarantee was approximately $670 million. Under
a separate ground lease, the land on which the building is built was leased to an affiliate of Bear
Stearns which, as part of the Synthetic Lease, assigned this position to the Synthetic Lease
lessor. The owner of the land has sued the Firm alleging that certain provisions of the merger
agreement with Bear Stearns violated a right of first offer provision of the ground lease. The
Firm has moved to dismiss the lawsuit on various grounds, including that the right of first offer
provision is inapplicable to the Bear Stearns merger.
147
Loans sold with recourse
The Firm provides servicing for mortgages and certain commercial lending products related to the
Washington Mutual transaction on both a recourse and nonrecourse basis. In nonrecourse servicing, the
principal credit risk to the Firm is the cost of temporary servicing advances of funds (i.e.,
normal servicing advances). In recourse servicing, the servicer agrees to share credit risk with
the owner of the mortgage loans, such as Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac or a private investor, insurer
or guarantor. Losses on recourse servicing occur primarily when foreclosure sales proceeds of the
property underlying a defaulted loan are less than the outstanding principal balance and accrued
interest of the loan and the cost of holding and disposing of the underlying property. The Firms
securitizations are primarily nonrecourse, thereby effectively transferring the risk of future
credit losses to the purchaser of the securities issued by the trust. As of September 30, 2008, and
December 31, 2007, the unpaid principal balance of loans sold
with recourse totaled $15.7 billion
and $557 million, respectively. Losses related to recourse obligations are not expected to be
significant.
As part of the Firms loan securitization activities, as described in Note 16 on pages 139145 of
JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report, the Firm provides representations and warranties that certain
securitized loans meet specific requirements. The Firm may be required to repurchase the loans
and/or indemnify the purchaser of the loans against losses due to any breaches of such
representations or warranties. Generally, the maximum amount of future payments the Firm would be
required to make under such repurchase and/or indemnification provisions would be equal to the
current amount of assets held by such securitization-related SPEs as of September 30, 2008, plus,
in certain circumstances, accrued and unpaid interest on such loans and certain expense.
Historically, losses incurred on such repurchases and/or indemnifications have been inconsequential
because the collateral backing the loans was sufficient to recover the unpaid principal balance of
the loans. Losses related to these representations and warranties could increase in future periods
due to continued declines in housing prices.
NOTE 30 CREDIT RISK CONCENTRATIONS
Concentrations of credit risk arise when a number of customers are engaged in similar business
activities or activities in the same geographic region, or when they have similar economic features
that would cause their ability to meet contractual obligations to be similarly affected by changes
in economic conditions.
JPMorgan Chase regularly monitors various segments of its credit portfolio to assess potential
concentration risks and to obtain collateral when deemed necessary. In the Firms wholesale
portfolio, risk concentrations are evaluated primarily by industry and by geographic region. In the
consumer portfolio, concentrations are evaluated primarily by product and by U.S. geographic
region.
The Firm does not believe exposure to any one loan product with varying terms (e.g., interest-only
payments for an introductory period, option ARMs) or exposure to loans with high loan-to-value
ratios would result in a significant concentration of credit risk. Terms of loan products and
collateral coverage are included in the Firms assessment when extending credit and establishing
its allowance for loan losses.
For further information regarding onbalance sheet credit concentrations by major product and
geography, see Note 13 on page 121 of this Form 10-Q, and Note 14 on page 137 of JPMorgan Chases
2007 Annual Report. For information regarding concentrations of offbalance sheet lending-related
financial instruments by major product, see Note 29 on page 146 of this Form 10-Q, and Note 31 on
pages 170173 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report. More information about concentrations can be
found in the following tables or discussion in the Managements Discussion and Analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This Form 10-Q |
|
2007 Annual Report |
Wholesale credit exposure
|
|
Page 67
|
|
Page 77 |
Wholesale selected industry concentrations
|
|
Page 68
|
|
Page 78 |
Wholesale criticized exposure
|
|
Page 68
|
|
Page 79 |
Credit derivatives
|
|
Page 70
|
|
Page 81 |
Credit portfolio activities
|
|
Page 71
|
|
Page 82 |
Emerging markets country exposure
|
|
Page 72
|
|
Page 83 |
Consumer credit portfolio
|
|
Page 73
|
|
Page 84 |
|
148
The table below presents both on-balance sheet and off-balance sheet wholesale- and
consumer-related credit exposure as of September 30, 2008, and December 31, 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
December 31, 2007 |
|
|
Credit |
|
On-balance |
|
Off-balance |
|
Credit |
|
On-balance |
|
Off-balance |
(in billions) |
|
exposure(c) |
|
sheet(c)(d) |
|
sheet(e) |
|
exposure(c) |
|
sheet(c)(d) |
|
sheet(e) |
|
Wholesale-related:(a) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate |
|
$ |
84.3 |
|
|
$ |
68.8 |
|
|
$ |
15.5 |
|
|
$ |
38.8 |
|
|
$ |
21.7 |
|
|
$ |
17.1 |
|
Banks and finance companies |
|
|
74.7 |
|
|
|
48.3 |
|
|
|
26.4 |
|
|
|
65.5 |
|
|
|
29.5 |
|
|
|
36.0 |
|
Asset managers |
|
|
49.9 |
|
|
|
28.3 |
|
|
|
21.6 |
|
|
|
38.7 |
|
|
|
16.4 |
|
|
|
22.3 |
|
Consumer products |
|
|
38.0 |
|
|
|
11.5 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
11.6 |
|
|
|
19.9 |
|
Securities firms & exchanges |
|
|
37.1 |
|
|
|
31.6 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
|
|
23.6 |
|
|
|
16.5 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
Healthcare |
|
|
36.4 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
27.4 |
|
|
|
31.9 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
24.2 |
|
Retail & consumer services |
|
|
34.1 |
|
|
|
12.8 |
|
|
|
21.3 |
|
|
|
27.8 |
|
|
|
11.0 |
|
|
|
16.8 |
|
State & municipal governments |
|
|
32.3 |
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
|
|
21.7 |
|
|
|
31.4 |
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
|
22.5 |
|
Utilities |
|
|
31.5 |
|
|
|
12.7 |
|
|
|
18.8 |
|
|
|
30.0 |
|
|
|
9.0 |
|
|
|
21.0 |
|
Oil & gas |
|
|
26.1 |
|
|
|
11.1 |
|
|
|
15.0 |
|
|
|
26.5 |
|
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
14.2 |
|
All other wholesale |
|
|
370.5 |
|
|
|
162.4 |
|
|
|
208.1 |
|
|
|
391.2 |
|
|
|
145.6 |
|
|
|
245.6 |
|
|
Total wholesale-related |
|
|
814.9 |
|
|
|
407.1 |
|
|
|
407.8 |
|
|
|
736.9 |
|
|
|
290.2 |
|
|
|
446.7 |
|
|
Consumer-related: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home equity |
|
|
213.9 |
|
|
|
116.8 |
|
|
|
97.1 |
|
|
|
169.0 |
|
|
|
94.8 |
|
|
|
74.2 |
|
Prime mortgage |
|
|
77.0 |
|
|
|
70.4 |
|
|
|
6.6 |
|
|
|
47.9 |
|
|
|
40.5 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
|
Subprime mortgage |
|
|
18.3 |
|
|
|
18.2 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
15.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Option ARMs |
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auto loans and leases |
|
|
51.4 |
|
|
|
43.3 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
|
|
50.5 |
|
|
|
42.4 |
|
|
|
8.1 |
|
Credit card reported(b) |
|
|
877.6 |
|
|
|
92.7 |
|
|
|
784.9 |
|
|
|
799.2 |
|
|
|
84.4 |
|
|
|
714.8 |
|
All other loans |
|
|
48.7 |
|
|
|
34.6 |
|
|
|
14.1 |
|
|
|
40.1 |
|
|
|
28.7 |
|
|
|
11.4 |
|
|
Total consumer excluding
purchased credit impaired |
|
|
1,305.9 |
|
|
|
395.0 |
|
|
|
910.9 |
|
|
|
1,122.2 |
|
|
|
306.3 |
|
|
|
815.9 |
|
|
Consumer loans purchased
credit impaired |
|
|
77.9 |
|
|
|
77.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consumerrelated |
|
|
1,383.8 |
|
|
|
472.9 |
|
|
|
910.9 |
|
|
|
1,122.2 |
|
|
|
306.3 |
|
|
|
815.9 |
|
|
Total exposure |
|
$ |
2,198.7 |
|
|
$ |
880.0 |
|
|
$ |
1,318.7 |
|
|
$ |
1,859.1 |
|
|
$ |
596.5 |
|
|
$ |
1,262.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes $25.4 billion of receivables from customers at September 30, 2008. |
(b) |
|
Excludes $93.7 billion and $72.7 billion of securitized credit card receivables at September
30, 2008, and December 31, 2007, respectively. |
(c) |
|
Includes loans held-for-sale and loans at fair value. |
(d) |
|
Represents loans and derivative receivables. |
(e) |
|
Represents lending-related financial instruments. |
NOTE 31 BUSINESS SEGMENTS
JPMorgan Chase is organized into six major reportable business segments Investment Bank, Retail
Financial Services, Card Services, Commercial Banking (CB), Treasury & Securities Services
(TSS) and Asset Management (AM), as well as a Corporate/Private Equity segment. The segments
are based upon the products and services provided or the type of customer served, and they reflect
the manner in which financial information is currently evaluated by management. Results of these
lines of business are presented on a managed basis. For a definition of managed basis, see the
footnotes to the table below. For a further discussion concerning JPMorgan Chases business
segments, see Business Segment Results on pages 2021 of this Form 10-Q, and pages 3839 and Note
34 on pages 175177 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report.
As part of the Bear Stearns merger integration, the businesses of Bear Stearns were reviewed and
aligned with the business segments of JPMorgan Chase. The Merger predominantly affected the IB and
AM lines of business. The impact of the Merger on the respective JPMorgan Chase business segments
is discussed in the segment results of the applicable line of business.
The effects of Washington Mutuals banking operations are not included in the following business
segment results as such operations did not have a material effect on the results of the quarter
ended September 30, 2008, except the charge to conform Washington Mutuals loan loss reserves and
the extraordinary gain related to the transaction which are reflected for JPMorgan Chase in the
Corporate/Private Equity segment.
Line of business equity increased during the second quarter of 2008 in IB and AM due to the Bear
Stearns merger. Line of business equity increased from the third quarter of 2007 primarily due to
the Bear Stearns merger, business growth across the businesses and, for AM, the purchase of the
additional equity interest in Highbridge.
Segment results
The following tables provide a summary of the Firms segment results for the three and nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, on a managed basis. The impact of credit card securitization
adjustments have been included in
149
reconciling items so that the total Firm results are on a reported basis. Finally, total net
revenue (noninterest revenue and net interest income) for each of the segments is presented on a
tax-equivalent basis. Accordingly, revenue from tax-exempt securities and investments that receive
tax credits are presented in the managed results on a basis comparable to taxable securities and
investments. This approach allows management to assess the comparability of revenue arising from
both taxable and tax-exempt sources. The corresponding income tax impact related to these items is
recorded within income tax expense (benefit). The following tables summarize the business segment
results and reconciliation to reported U.S. GAAP results.
Segment results and reconciliation(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
Investment |
|
|
Retail Financial |
|
|
Card |
|
|
Commercial |
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
Bank |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Services(e) |
|
|
Banking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
$ |
1,357 |
|
|
$ |
1,731 |
|
|
$ |
646 |
|
|
$ |
388 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
2,678 |
|
|
|
3,144 |
|
|
|
3,241 |
|
|
|
737 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
4,035 |
|
|
|
4,875 |
|
|
|
3,887 |
|
|
|
1,125 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
1,678 |
|
|
|
2,229 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
Credit reimbursement (to)/from TSS(b) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense(c) |
|
|
3,816 |
|
|
|
2,772 |
|
|
|
1,194 |
|
|
|
486 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
464 |
|
|
|
513 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(866 |
) |
|
|
178 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before extraordinary gain |
|
|
882 |
|
|
|
247 |
|
|
|
292 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
Extraordinary gain(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
882 |
|
|
$ |
247 |
|
|
$ |
292 |
|
|
$ |
312 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average equity |
|
$ |
26,000 |
|
|
$ |
17,000 |
|
|
$ |
14,100 |
|
|
$ |
7,000 |
|
Average assets |
|
|
890,040 |
|
|
|
230,428 |
|
|
|
169,413 |
|
|
|
101,681 |
|
Return on average equity |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
Overhead ratio |
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
Treasury & |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Corporate/ |
|
|
Reconciling |
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
Securities Services |
|
|
Management |
|
|
Private Equity |
|
|
Items(e)(g) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
$ |
1,230 |
|
|
$ |
1,581 |
|
|
$ |
(1,710 |
) |
|
$ |
520 |
|
|
$ |
5,743 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
723 |
|
|
|
380 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(1,871 |
) |
|
|
8,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
1,953 |
|
|
|
1,961 |
|
|
|
(1,748 |
) |
|
|
(1,351 |
) |
|
|
14,737 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
2,355 |
(f) |
|
|
(873 |
) |
|
|
5,787 |
|
Credit reimbursement (to)/from TSS(b) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense(c) |
|
|
1,339 |
|
|
|
1,362 |
|
|
|
168 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense |
|
|
565 |
|
|
|
579 |
|
|
|
(4,271 |
) |
|
|
(478 |
) |
|
|
(2,187 |
) |
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
228 |
|
|
|
(1,727 |
) |
|
|
(478 |
) |
|
|
(2,133 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain |
|
|
406 |
|
|
|
351 |
|
|
|
(2,544 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(54 |
) |
Extraordinary gain(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
406 |
|
|
$ |
351 |
|
|
$ |
(1,963 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
527 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average equity |
|
$ |
3,500 |
|
|
$ |
5,500 |
|
|
$ |
53,540 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
126,640 |
|
Average assets |
|
|
49,386 |
|
|
|
71,189 |
|
|
|
319,934 |
|
|
|
(75,712 |
) |
|
|
1,756,359 |
|
Return on average equity |
|
|
46 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
(1)% |
(h) |
Overhead ratio |
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
Investment |
|
|
Retail Financial |
|
|
Card |
|
|
Commercial |
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
Bank |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Services(e) |
|
|
Banking |
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
$ |
1,649 |
|
|
$ |
1,520 |
|
|
$ |
759 |
|
|
$ |
290 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
1,297 |
|
|
|
2,681 |
|
|
|
3,108 |
|
|
|
719 |
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
2,946 |
|
|
|
4,201 |
|
|
|
3,867 |
|
|
|
1,009 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
227 |
|
|
|
680 |
|
|
|
1,363 |
|
|
|
112 |
|
Credit reimbursement (to)/from TSS(b) |
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense(c) |
|
|
2,378 |
|
|
|
2,469 |
|
|
|
1,262 |
|
|
|
473 |
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
424 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
456 |
|
|
|
166 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
296 |
|
|
$ |
639 |
|
|
$ |
786 |
|
|
$ |
258 |
|
|
Average equity |
|
$ |
21,000 |
|
|
$ |
16,000 |
|
|
$ |
14,100 |
|
|
$ |
6,700 |
|
Average assets |
|
|
710,665 |
|
|
|
214,852 |
|
|
|
154,956 |
|
|
|
86,652 |
|
Return on average equity |
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
Overhead ratio |
|
|
81 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
Treasury & |
|
|
Asset |
|
|
Corporate/ |
|
|
Reconciling |
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
Securities Services |
|
|
Management |
|
|
Private Equity |
|
|
Items(e)(g) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
$ |
1,145 |
|
|
$ |
1,912 |
|
|
$ |
1,280 |
|
|
$ |
644 |
|
|
$ |
9,199 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
603 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
|
|
(279 |
) |
|
|
(1,509 |
) |
|
|
6,913 |
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
1,748 |
|
|
|
2,205 |
|
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
|
(865 |
) |
|
|
16,112 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(578 |
) |
|
|
1,785 |
|
Credit reimbursement (to)/from TSS(b) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense(c) |
|
|
1,134 |
|
|
|
1,366 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,327 |
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense |
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
836 |
|
|
|
787 |
|
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
5,000 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
214 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
(287 |
) |
|
|
1,627 |
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
360 |
|
|
$ |
521 |
|
|
$ |
513 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
3,373 |
|
|
Average equity |
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,000 |
|
|
$ |
54,176 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
118,976 |
|
Average assets |
|
|
55,688 |
|
|
|
53,879 |
|
|
|
266,742 |
|
|
|
(66,100 |
) |
|
|
1,477,334 |
|
Return on average equity |
|
|
48 |
% |
|
|
52 |
% |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Overhead ratio |
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
Investment |
|
|
Retail Financial |
|
|
Card |
|
|
Commercial |
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
Bank |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Services(e) |
|
|
Banking |
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
$ |
5,706 |
|
|
$ |
5,382 |
|
|
$ |
2,129 |
|
|
$ |
1,105 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
6,810 |
|
|
|
9,210 |
|
|
|
9,437 |
|
|
|
2,193 |
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
12,516 |
|
|
|
14,592 |
|
|
|
11,566 |
|
|
|
3,298 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
1,250 |
|
|
|
5,502 |
|
|
|
6,093 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
Credit reimbursement (to)/from TSS(b) |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense(c) |
|
|
11,103 |
|
|
|
8,012 |
|
|
|
3,651 |
|
|
|
1,447 |
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
254 |
|
|
|
1,078 |
|
|
|
1,822 |
|
|
|
1,577 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
(935 |
) |
|
|
452 |
|
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
618 |
|
|
Income before extraordinary gain |
|
|
1,189 |
|
|
|
626 |
|
|
|
1,151 |
|
|
|
959 |
|
Extraordinary gain(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,189 |
|
|
$ |
626 |
|
|
$ |
1,151 |
|
|
$ |
959 |
|
|
Average equity |
|
$ |
23,781 |
|
|
$ |
17,000 |
|
|
$ |
14,100 |
|
|
$ |
7,000 |
|
Average assets |
|
|
820,497 |
|
|
|
230,239 |
|
|
|
163,560 |
|
|
|
102,374 |
|
Return on average equity |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
Overhead ratio |
|
|
89 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
151
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
Treasury & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate/ |
|
|
Reconciling |
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
Securities Services |
|
|
Asset Management |
|
|
Private Equity |
|
|
Items(e)(g) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
$ |
3,876 |
|
|
$ |
4,874 |
|
|
$ |
157 |
|
|
$ |
1,850 |
|
|
$ |
25,079 |
|
Net interest income (expense) |
|
|
2,009 |
|
|
|
1,052 |
|
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
(5,488 |
) |
|
|
24,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
5,885 |
|
|
|
5,926 |
|
|
|
(119 |
) |
|
|
(3,638 |
) |
|
|
50,026 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
2,841 |
(f) |
|
|
(2,384 |
) |
|
|
13,666 |
|
Credit reimbursement (to)/from TSS(b) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense(c) |
|
|
3,884 |
|
|
|
4,085 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense |
|
|
1,873 |
|
|
|
1,788 |
|
|
|
(3,023 |
) |
|
|
(1,254 |
) |
|
|
4,115 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
639 |
|
|
|
686 |
|
|
|
(1,084 |
) |
|
|
(1,254 |
) |
|
|
(207 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before extraordinary gain |
|
|
1,234 |
|
|
|
1,102 |
|
|
|
(1,939 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,322 |
|
Extraordinary gain(d) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
$ |
1,234 |
|
|
$ |
1,102 |
|
|
$ |
(1,358 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average equity |
|
$ |
3,500 |
|
|
$ |
5,190 |
|
|
$ |
55,307 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
125,878 |
|
Average assets |
|
|
54,243 |
|
|
|
65,518 |
|
|
|
302,820 |
|
|
|
(73,966 |
) |
|
|
1,665,285 |
|
Return on average equity |
|
|
47 |
% |
|
|
28 |
% |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
4 |
%(h) |
Overhead ratio |
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
Investment |
|
|
Retail Financial |
|
|
Card |
|
|
Commercial |
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
Bank |
|
|
Services |
|
|
Services(e) |
|
|
Banking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
$ |
12,379 |
|
|
$ |
4,693 |
|
|
$ |
2,212 |
|
|
$ |
937 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
2,619 |
|
|
|
7,971 |
|
|
|
9,052 |
|
|
|
2,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
14,998 |
|
|
|
12,664 |
|
|
|
11,264 |
|
|
|
3,019 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
454 |
|
|
|
1,559 |
|
|
|
3,923 |
|
|
|
174 |
|
Credit reimbursement (to)/from TSS(b) |
|
|
91 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense(c) |
|
|
10,063 |
|
|
|
7,360 |
|
|
|
3,691 |
|
|
|
1,454 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense |
|
|
4,572 |
|
|
|
3,745 |
|
|
|
3,650 |
|
|
|
1,391 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
1,557 |
|
|
|
1,462 |
|
|
|
1,340 |
|
|
|
545 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
3,015 |
|
|
$ |
2,283 |
|
|
$ |
2,310 |
|
|
$ |
846 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average equity |
|
$ |
21,000 |
|
|
$ |
16,000 |
|
|
$ |
14,100 |
|
|
$ |
6,435 |
|
Average assets |
|
|
688,730 |
|
|
|
216,218 |
|
|
|
155,206 |
|
|
|
84,643 |
|
Return on average equity |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
19 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
18 |
% |
Overhead ratio |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
Treasury & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate/ |
|
|
Reconciling |
|
|
|
|
(in millions, except ratios) |
|
Securities Services |
|
|
Asset Management |
|
|
Private Equity |
|
|
Items(e)(g) |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
$ |
3,400 |
|
|
$ |
5,415 |
|
|
$ |
3,900 |
|
|
$ |
1,869 |
|
|
$ |
34,805 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
1,615 |
|
|
|
831 |
|
|
|
(569 |
) |
|
|
(4,418 |
) |
|
|
19,183 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
5,015 |
|
|
|
6,246 |
|
|
|
3,331 |
|
|
|
(2,549 |
) |
|
|
53,988 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
(1,761 |
) |
|
|
4,322 |
|
Credit reimbursement (to)/from TSS(b) |
|
|
(91 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest expense(c) |
|
|
3,358 |
|
|
|
3,956 |
|
|
|
1,101 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,983 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense |
|
|
1,551 |
|
|
|
2,307 |
|
|
|
2,255 |
|
|
|
(788 |
) |
|
|
18,683 |
|
Income tax expense (benefit) |
|
|
576 |
|
|
|
868 |
|
|
|
729 |
|
|
|
(788 |
) |
|
|
6,289 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
975 |
|
|
$ |
1,439 |
|
|
$ |
1,526 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
12,394 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average equity |
|
$ |
3,000 |
|
|
$ |
3,834 |
|
|
$ |
53,398 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
117,767 |
|
Average assets |
|
|
50,829 |
|
|
|
50,498 |
|
|
|
249,363 |
|
|
|
(65,715 |
) |
|
|
1,429,772 |
|
Return on average equity |
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Overhead ratio |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
NM |
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In addition to analyzing the Firms results on a reported basis, management reviews the
results of the Firms lines of business on a managed basis, which is a non-GAAP financial
measure. The Firms definition of managed basis starts with the reported U.S. GAAP results and
includes certain reclassifications that do not have any impact on net income as reported by
the lines of business or by the Firm as a whole. |
(b) |
|
TSS is charged a credit reimbursement related to certain exposures managed within the IB
credit portfolio on behalf of clients shared with TSS. |
(c) |
|
Includes merger costs which are reported in the Corporate/Private Equity segment. Merger
costs attributed to the business segments for the three and nine months ended September 30,
2008 and 2007 were as follows. |
152
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment Bank |
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
149 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Retail Financial Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
Card Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
Commercial Banking |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury & Securities Services |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95 |
|
Asset Management |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
Corporate/Private Equity |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
101 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total merger costs |
|
$ |
96 |
|
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Effective September 25, 2008, JPMorgan Chase acquired the banking operations of Washington
Mutual from the FDIC for $1.9 billion. The fair value of the net assets acquired exceeded the
purchase price, which resulted in negative goodwill. In accordance with SFAS 141, nonfinancial
assets that are not held-for-sale were written down against that negative goodwill. The
negative goodwill that remained after writing down nonfinancial assets was recognized as an
extraordinary gain. |
(e) |
|
Managed results for CS exclude the impact of credit card securitizations on total net
revenue, provision for credit losses and average assets, as JPMorgan Chase treats the sold
receivables as if they were still on the balance sheet in evaluating credit performance of
CSs entire managed credit card portfolio as operations are funded, and decisions are made
about allocating resources such as employees and capital, based upon managed information.
These adjustments are eliminated in reconciling items to arrive at the Firms reported U.S.
GAAP results. The related securitization adjustments were as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
$ |
(843 |
) |
|
$ |
(836 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,623 |
) |
|
$ |
(2,370 |
) |
Net interest income |
|
|
1,716 |
|
|
|
1,414 |
|
|
|
5,007 |
|
|
|
4,131 |
|
Provision for credit losses |
|
|
873 |
|
|
|
578 |
|
|
|
2,384 |
|
|
|
1,761 |
|
Average assets |
|
|
75,712 |
|
|
|
66,100 |
|
|
|
73,966 |
|
|
|
65,715 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f) |
|
Included a $2.0 billion charge to conform Washington Mutuals loan loss reserve to JPMorgan
Chases allowance methodology in the third quarter of 2008. |
(g) |
|
Segment managed results reflect revenue on a tax-equivalent basis with the corresponding
income tax impact recorded within income tax expense. These adjustments are eliminated in
reconciling items to arrive at the Firms reported U.S. GAAP results. Tax-equivalent
adjustments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007 were as follows. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, |
|
Nine months ended September 30, |
(in millions) |
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2008 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noninterest revenue |
|
$ |
323 |
|
|
$ |
192 |
|
|
$ |
773 |
|
|
$ |
501 |
|
Net interest income |
|
|
155 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
|
|
481 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
478 |
|
|
|
287 |
|
|
|
1,254 |
|
|
|
788 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(h) |
|
Ratio is based upon income (loss) before extraordinary gain. |
153
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS, INTEREST AND RATES
(Taxable-Equivalent Interest and Rates; in millions, except rates)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
Three months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
(Annualized) |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
(Annualized) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits with banks |
|
$ |
41,303 |
|
|
$ |
316 |
|
|
|
3.04 |
% |
|
$ |
39,906 |
|
|
$ |
508 |
|
|
|
5.06 |
% |
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under
resale agreements |
|
|
164,980 |
|
|
|
1,558 |
|
|
|
3.76 |
|
|
|
133,780 |
|
|
|
1,629 |
|
|
|
4.83 |
|
Securities borrowed |
|
|
134,651 |
|
|
|
703 |
|
|
|
2.07 |
|
|
|
87,955 |
|
|
|
1,242 |
|
|
|
5.60 |
|
Trading assets debt instruments |
|
|
298,760 |
|
|
|
4,552 |
|
|
|
6.06 |
|
|
|
310,445 |
|
|
|
4,769 |
|
|
|
6.09 |
|
Securities |
|
|
119,443 |
|
|
|
1,530 |
|
|
|
5.09 |
(d) |
|
|
95,694 |
|
|
|
1,371 |
|
|
|
5.69 |
(d) |
Loans |
|
|
536,890 |
|
|
|
8,514 |
|
|
|
6.31 |
|
|
|
476,912 |
|
|
|
9,382 |
|
|
|
7.80 |
|
Other assets(a) |
|
|
37,237 |
|
|
|
308 |
|
|
|
3.29 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
1,333,264 |
|
|
|
17,481 |
|
|
|
5.22 |
|
|
|
1,144,692 |
|
|
|
18,901 |
|
|
|
6.55 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(13,351 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,691 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
29,553 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets equity instruments |
|
|
92,300 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,177 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets derivative receivables |
|
|
111,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64,821 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
45,947 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
11,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,290 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased credit card relationships |
|
|
1,903 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,505 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other intangibles |
|
|
3,609 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,027 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
140,109 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,756,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,477,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
589,348 |
|
|
$ |
3,351 |
|
|
|
2.26 |
% |
|
$ |
540,937 |
|
|
$ |
5,638 |
|
|
|
4.13 |
% |
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or
sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
200,032 |
|
|
|
1,322 |
|
|
|
2.63 |
|
|
|
206,174 |
|
|
|
2,693 |
|
|
|
5.18 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
47,579 |
|
|
|
246 |
|
|
|
2.05 |
|
|
|
26,511 |
|
|
|
312 |
|
|
|
4.68 |
|
Other borrowings(b) |
|
|
91,756 |
|
|
|
995 |
|
|
|
4.32 |
|
|
|
104,995 |
|
|
|
1,296 |
|
|
|
4.90 |
|
Other liabilities(c) |
|
|
70,065 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
0.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial interests issued
by consolidated VIEs |
|
|
11,431 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
|
|
|
14,454 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
4.52 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
261,385 |
|
|
|
2,176 |
|
|
|
3.31 |
|
|
|
177,851 |
|
|
|
1,789 |
|
|
|
3.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,271,596 |
|
|
|
8,332 |
|
|
|
2.61 |
|
|
|
1,070,922 |
|
|
|
11,893 |
|
|
|
4.41 |
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
127,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
121,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities derivative payables |
|
|
83,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,467 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other
liabilities, including the allowance for lending-related commitments |
|
|
140,119 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,622,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,358,358 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
7,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stockholders equity |
|
|
126,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
133,740 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
118,976 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,756,359 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,477,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.61 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.14 |
% |
Net interest income and net yield on |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
interest-earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
9,149 |
|
|
|
2.73 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
7,008 |
|
|
|
2.43 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Predominantly margin loans. |
(b) |
|
Includes securities sold but not yet purchased. |
(c) |
|
Includes brokerage customer payables. |
(d) |
|
For the quarters ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the annualized rate for
available-for-sale securities based upon amortized cost was 5.04% and 5.64%, respectively. |
154
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.
CONSOLIDATED AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS, INTEREST AND RATES
(Taxable-Equivalent Interest and Rates; in millions, except rates)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2007 |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rate |
|
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
(Annualized) |
|
|
Balance |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
(Annualized) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits with banks |
|
$ |
37,378 |
|
|
$ |
1,025 |
|
|
|
3.66 |
% |
|
$ |
24,848 |
|
|
$ |
901 |
|
|
|
4.85 |
% |
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under
resale agreements |
|
|
158,195 |
|
|
|
4,498 |
|
|
|
3.80 |
|
|
|
134,009 |
|
|
|
4,936 |
|
|
|
4.92 |
|
Securities borrowed |
|
|
106,258 |
|
|
|
2,013 |
|
|
|
2.53 |
|
|
|
85,878 |
|
|
|
3,498 |
|
|
|
5.45 |
|
Trading assets debt instruments |
|
|
307,899 |
|
|
|
13,369 |
|
|
|
5.80 |
|
|
|
287,680 |
|
|
|
12,701 |
|
|
|
5.90 |
|
Securities |
|
|
106,392 |
|
|
|
4,190 |
|
|
|
5.26 |
(d) |
|
|
95,982 |
|
|
|
4,077 |
|
|
|
5.68 |
(d) |
Loans |
|
|
533,829 |
|
|
|
26,311 |
|
|
|
6.58 |
|
|
|
470,078 |
|
|
|
26,942 |
|
|
|
7.66 |
|
Other assets(a) |
|
|
17,694 |
|
|
|
462 |
|
|
|
3.49 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest-earning assets |
|
|
1,267,645 |
|
|
|
51,868 |
|
|
|
5.47 |
|
|
|
1,098,475 |
|
|
|
53,055 |
|
|
|
6.46 |
|
Allowance for loan losses |
|
|
(11,667 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7,417 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from banks |
|
|
32,071 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32,167 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets equity instruments |
|
|
90,220 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,923 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading assets derivative receivables |
|
|
104,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,801 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
45,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,194 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage servicing rights |
|
|
10,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,487 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased credit card relationships |
|
|
2,062 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,674 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other intangibles |
|
|
3,783 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,166 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
120,529 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97,302 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,665,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,429,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing deposits |
|
$ |
600,554 |
|
|
$ |
11,551 |
|
|
|
2.57 |
% |
|
$ |
517,856 |
|
|
$ |
15,975 |
|
|
|
4.12 |
% |
Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or
sold under repurchase agreements |
|
|
194,446 |
|
|
|
4,184 |
|
|
|
2.87 |
|
|
|
204,942 |
|
|
|
7,903 |
|
|
|
5.16 |
|
Commercial paper |
|
|
47,496 |
|
|
|
904 |
|
|
|
2.54 |
|
|
|
24,726 |
|
|
|
892 |
|
|
|
4.82 |
|
Other borrowings(b) |
|
|
97,185 |
|
|
|
3,322 |
|
|
|
4.57 |
|
|
|
100,492 |
|
|
|
3,668 |
|
|
|
4.88 |
|
Other liabilities(c) |
|
|
29,891 |
|
|
|
222 |
|
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beneficial interests issued
by consolidated VIEs |
|
|
14,490 |
|
|
|
315 |
|
|
|
2.90 |
|
|
|
14,691 |
|
|
|
425 |
|
|
|
3.86 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
230,472 |
|
|
|
5,942 |
|
|
|
3.44 |
|
|
|
162,929 |
|
|
|
4,722 |
|
|
|
3.87 |
|
|
Total interest-bearing liabilities |
|
|
1,214,534 |
|
|
|
26,440 |
|
|
|
2.91 |
|
|
|
1,025,636 |
|
|
|
33,585 |
|
|
|
4.38 |
|
Noninterest-bearing deposits |
|
|
122,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trading liabilities derivative payables |
|
|
81,568 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,742 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other liabilities, including the allowance for lending-related commitments |
|
|
117,399 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101,723 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
1,535,512 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,312,005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
3,895 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stockholders equity |
|
|
125,878 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
129,773 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,665,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
1,429,772 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate spread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.56 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.08 |
% |
Net interest income and net yield on interest-earning assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,428 |
|
|
|
2.68 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
19,470 |
|
|
|
2.37 |
% |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Predominantly margin loans. |
(b) |
|
Includes securities sold but not yet purchased. |
(c) |
|
Includes brokerage customer payables. |
(d) |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, the annualized rate for
available-for-sale securities based upon amortized cost was 5.25% and 5.66%, respectively. |
155
GLOSSARY OF TERMS
ACH: Automated clearing house.
Advised lines of credit: An authorization which specifies the maximum amount of a credit facility
the Firm has made available to an obligor on a revolving but non-binding basis. The borrower
receives written or oral advice of this facility. The Firm may cancel this facility at any time.
APB 18: Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 18, The Equity Method of Accounting for
Investments in Common Stock.
Assets under management: Represent assets actively managed by Asset Management on behalf of
institutional, private banking, private client services and retail clients. Excludes assets managed
by American Century Companies, Inc., in which the Firm has a 43% ownership interest.
Assets under supervision: Represent assets under management as well as custody, brokerage,
administration and deposit accounts.
Average managed assets: Refers to total assets on the Firms balance sheet plus credit card
receivables that have been securitized.
Beneficial interest issued by consolidated VIEs: Represents the interest of third-party holders of
debt/equity securities, or other obligations, issued by VIEs that JPMorgan Chase consolidates under
FIN 46R. The underlying obligations of the VIEs consist of short-term borrowings, commercial paper
and long-term debt. The related assets consist of trading assets, available-for-sale securities,
loans and other assets.
Benefit obligation: Refers to the projected benefit obligation for pension plans and the
accumulated postretirement benefit obligation for OPEB plans.
Combined effective loan-to-value ratio: For residential real estate loans, an indicator of how much
equity a borrower has in a secured borrowing based upon current estimates of the value of the
collateral and considering all lien positions related to the property.
Contractual credit card charge-off: In accordance with the Federal Financial Institutions
Examination Council policy, credit card loans are charged off by the end of the month in which the
account becomes 180 days past due or within 60 days from receiving notification of the filing of
bankruptcy, whichever is earlier.
Credit derivatives: Contractual agreements that provide protection against a credit event of one or
more referenced credits. The nature of a credit event is established by the protection buyer and
protection seller at the inception of a transaction, and such events include bankruptcy, insolvency
or failure to meet payment obligations when due. The buyer of the credit derivative pays a periodic
fee in return for a payment by the protection seller upon the occurrence, if any, of a credit
event.
EITF: Emerging Issues Task Force.
EITF Issue 06-11: Accounting for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment Awards.
EITF Issue 99-20: Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased and Retained
Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets.
FASB: Financial Accounting Standards Board.
FICO: Fair Isaac Corporation.
FIN 39: FASB Interpretation No. 39, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts an
interpretation of APB Opinion No. 10 and FASB Statement No. 105.
FIN 41: FASB Interpretation No. 41, Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Repurchase and
Reverse Repurchase Agreements an interpretation of APB Opinion No. 10 and a Modification of FASB
Interpretation No. 39.
156
FIN 45: FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for
Guarantees, including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others an interpretation of FASB
Statements No. 5, 57 and 107 and a rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 34.
FIN 46R: FASB Interpretation No. 46 (revised December 2003), Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities an interpretation of ARB No. 51.
FSP: FASB Staff Position.
FSP EITF 03-6-1: Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are
Participating Securities.
FSP FAS 133-1 and FIN 45-4: Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An
Amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45; and Clarification of the
Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161.
FSP FAS 140-3: Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing
Transactions.
FSP FAS 157-3: Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is
Not Active.
FSP FIN 39-1: Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39.
Interchange income: A fee paid to a credit card issuer in the clearing and settlement of a sales or
cash advance transaction.
Investment-grade: An indication of credit quality based upon JPMorgan Chases internal risk
assessment system. Investment-grade generally represents a risk profile similar to a rating of a
BBB-/Baa3 or better, as defined by independent rating agencies.
Managed basis: A non-GAAP presentation of financial results that includes reclassifications related
to credit card securitizations and taxable equivalents. Management uses this non-GAAP financial
measure at the segment level because it believes this provides information to investors in
understanding the underlying operational performance and trends of the particular business segment
and facilitates a comparison of the business segment with the performance of competitors.
Managed credit card receivables: Refers to credit card receivables on the Firms balance sheet plus
credit card receivables that have been securitized.
Mark-to-market exposure: A measure, at a point in time, of the value of a derivative or foreign
exchange contract in the open market. When the mark-to-market value is positive, it indicates the
counterparty owes JPMorgan Chase and, therefore, creates a repayment risk for the Firm. When the
mark-to-market value is negative, JPMorgan Chase owes the counterparty. In this situation, the Firm
does not have repayment risk.
Master netting agreement: An agreement between two counterparties that have multiple derivative
contracts with each other that provides for the net settlement of all contracts and the related
cash collateral through a single payment, in a single currency, in the event of default on or
termination of any one contract.
Mortgage
product types:
Alt-A
Alt-A loans are generally higher in credit quality than subprime loans but have characteristics
that would disqualify the borrower from a traditional prime loan. Alt-A lending characteristics may
include one or more of the following: (i) limited documentation; (ii) high combined-loan-to-value
(CLTV) ratio; (iii) loans secured by non-owner occupied properties; or (iv)
debt-to-income ratio above normal limits. Perhaps the most important characteristic is limited
documentation. A substantial proportion of traditional Alt-A loans are those where a borrower does
not provide complete documentation of his or her assets or the amount or source of his or her
income.
Option ARMs
The option ARM home loan product is an adjustable-rate mortgage loan that provides the borrower
with the option each month to make a fully amortizing, interest-only, or minimum payment. The
minimum payment on an option ARM loan is based upon the interest rate charged during the
introductory period. This introductory rate has usually been significantly below the fully indexed
rate. The fully indexed rate is calculated using an index rate plus a margin. Once the introductory
period ends, the contractual interest rate charged on the loan increases to the fully indexed rate
and adjusts monthly to reflect movements in the index. The minimum payment is typically
insufficient to cover interest accrued in the prior month and any unpaid interest is deferred and
added to the principal balance of the loan.
157
Prime
Prime mortgage loans generally have low default risk and are made to borrowers with good credit
records and a monthly income that is at least three to four times greater than their monthly
housing expense (mortgage payments plus taxes and other debt payments). These borrowers provide
full documentation and generally have reliable payment histories.
Subprime
Subprime loans are designed for customers with one or more high risk characteristics, including but
not limited to: (i) unreliable or poor payment histories;
(ii) high loan-to-value (LTV) ratio of greater than 80% (without
borrower-paid mortgage insurance); (iii) high debt-to-income ratio; (iv) the occupancy type for the
loan is other than the borrowers primary residence; or (v) a history of delinquencies or late
payments on the loan.
MSR risk management revenue: Includes changes in MSR asset fair value due to inputs or assumptions
in model and derivative valuation adjustments.
NA: Data is not applicable or available for the period presented.
Net yield on interest-earning assets: The average rate for interest-earning assets less the average
rate paid for all sources of funds.
NM: Not meaningful.
Nonconforming mortgage loans: Mortgage loans that do not meet the requirements for sale to U.S.
government agencies and U.S. government-sponsored enterprises. These requirements include limits on
loan-to-value ratios, loan terms, loan amounts, down payments, borrower credit worthiness and other
requirements.
OPEB: Other postretirement employee benefits.
Overhead ratio: Noninterest expense as a percentage of total net revenue.
Portfolio activity: Describes changes to the risk profile of existing lending-related exposures and
their impact on the allowance for credit losses from changes in customer profiles and inputs used
to estimate the allowances.
Principal transactions: Realized and unrealized gains and losses from trading activities (including
physical commodities inventories that are accounted for at the lower of cost or fair value) and
changes in fair value associated with instruments held by the Investment Bank for which the SFAS
159 fair value option was elected. Principal transactions also include private equity gains and
losses.
Purchased credit impaired loans: Acquired loans deemed to be credit impaired under SOP 03-3. SOP
03-3 allows purchasers to aggregate credit impaired loans acquired in the same fiscal quarter into
one or more pools, provided that the loans have common risk characteristics (e.g., FICO score,
geographic location). A pool is then accounted for as a single asset with a single composite
interest rate and an aggregate expectation of cash flows. Wholesale loans are generally determined
to be purchased credit impaired if just prior to acquisition they were impaired loans under SFAS
114. Consumer loans are determined to be purchased credit impaired based upon specific risk
characteristics of the loan, including delinquency status, geographic location, loan-to-value
ratios and product type.
Receivables from customers: Primarily represents margin loans to prime and retail brokerage
customers which are included in accrued interest and accounts receivable on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets for the wholesale lines of business.
Reported basis: Financial statements prepared under accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (U.S. GAAP). The reported basis includes the impact of credit card
securitizations but excludes the impact of taxable-equivalent adjustments.
Return on common equity less goodwill: Represents net income applicable to common stock divided by
total average common equity (net of goodwill). The Firm uses return on equity less goodwill, a
non-GAAP financial measure, to evaluate the operating performance of the Firm. The Firm also
utilizes this measure to facilitate operating comparisons to other competitors.
Risk layered loans: Loans with multiple high risk elements.
SAB: Staff Accounting Bulletin.
SAB 105: Application of Accounting Principles to Loan Commitments.
SAB 109: Written Loan Commitments Recorded at Fair Value Through Earnings.
SFAS: Statement of Financial Accounting Standards.
158
SFAS 5: Accounting for Contingencies.
SFAS 52: Foreign Currency Translation.
SFAS 114: Accounting by Creditors for Impairment of a Loan an amendment of FASB Statements No.
5 and 15.
SFAS 115: Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.
SFAS 133: Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.
SFAS 140: Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of
Liabilities a replacement of FASB Statement No. 125.
SFAS 141: Business Combinations.
SFAS 141R: Business Combinations.
SFAS 142: Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.
SFAS 155: Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial Instruments an amendment of FASB Statements
No. 133 and 140.
SFAS 157: Fair Value Measurements.
SFAS 158: Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans an
amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R).
SFAS 159: The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities Including an
amendment of FASB Statement No. 115.
SFAS 160: Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No.
51.
SFAS 161: Disclosures About Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities an amendment of FASB
Statement No. 133.
SOP: Statement of Position
SOP 03-3: Accounting for Certain Loans or Debt Securities Acquired in a Transfer.
Stress testing: A scenario that measures market risk under unlikely but plausible events in
abnormal markets.
Unaudited: The financial statements and information included throughout this document that are
labeled unaudited have not been subjected to auditing procedures sufficient to permit an
independent certified public accountant to express an opinion thereon.
U.S. GAAP: Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
U.S. government and federal agency obligations: Obligations of the U.S. government or an
instrumentality of the U.S. government whose obligations are fully and explicitly guaranteed for
timely payment of principal and interest by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government.
U.S. government-sponsored enterprise obligations: Obligations of agencies originally established or
chartered by the U.S. government to serve public purposes as specified by the U.S. Congress; these
obligations are not explicitly guaranteed for timely payment of principal and interest by the full
faith and credit of the U.S. government.
Value-at-risk (VaR): A measure of the dollar amount of potential loss from adverse market moves
in an ordinary market environment.
LINE OF BUSINESS METRICS
Investment Banking
IBs revenue comprises the following:
Investment
banking fees include advisory, equity underwriting, bond underwriting and loan
syndication fees.
Fixed
income markets include client and portfolio management revenue related to both market-making
and proprietary risk-taking across global fixed income markets, including foreign exchange,
interest rate, credit and commodities markets.
Equities
markets include client and portfolio management revenue related to market-making and
proprietary risk-taking across global equity products, including cash instruments, derivatives and
convertibles.
159
Credit
portfolio revenue includes net interest income, fees and loan sale activity, as well as
gains or losses on securities received as part of a loan restructuring, for IBs credit portfolio.
Credit portfolio revenue also includes the results of risk management related to the Firms lending
and derivative activities, and changes in the credit valuation adjustment (CVA), which is the
component of the fair value of a derivative that reflects the credit quality of the counterparty.
Retail Financial Services
Description of selected business metrics within Regional Banking:
Personal bankers Retail branch office personnel who acquire, retain and expand new and existing
customer relationships by assessing customer needs and recommending and selling appropriate banking
products and services.
Sales specialists Retail branch office personnel who specialize in the marketing of a single
product, including mortgages, investments and business banking, by partnering with the personal
bankers.
Mortgage banking revenue comprises the following:
Production
revenue includes net gains or losses on originations and sales of prime and subprime
mortgage loans and other production-related fees.
Net mortgage servicing revenue includes the following components:
(a) |
|
Servicing revenue represents all gross income earned from servicing third-party mortgage
loans including stated service fees, excess service fees, late fees, and other ancillary fees. |
|
(b) |
|
Changes in MSR asset fair value due to: |
|
|
|
market-based inputs such as interest rates and volatility, as well as updates to
assumptions used in the MSR valuation model. |
|
|
|
|
modeled servicing portfolio runoff (or time decay). |
(c) |
|
Derivative valuation adjustments and other, which represents changes in the fair value
of derivative instruments used to offset the impact of changes in the market-based inputs to
the MSR valuation model. |
MSR
risk management results include changes in the MSR asset fair value due to inputs or
assumptions and derivative valuation adjustments and other.
Mortgage Bankings origination channels comprise the following:
Retail Borrowers who are buying or refinancing a home through direct contact with a mortgage
banker employed by the Firm using a branch office, the Internet or by phone. Borrowers are
frequently referred to a mortgage banker by real estate brokers, home builders or other third
parties.
Wholesale A third-party mortgage broker refers loan applications to a mortgage banker at the
Firm. Brokers are independent loan originators that specialize in finding and counseling borrowers
but do not provide funding for loans.
Correspondent Correspondents are banks, thrifts, other mortgage banks and other financial
institutions that sell closed loans to the Firm.
Correspondent negotiated transactions (CNT) These transactions occur when mid- to large-sized
mortgage lenders, banks and bank-owned mortgage companies sell loans in bulk to the Firm, and the
Firm resells the loans, while retaining the servicing. These transactions supplement traditional
production channels and provide growth opportunities in the servicing portfolio in stable and
rising-rate periods.
Card Services
Description of selected business metrics within CS:
Charge volume Represents the dollar amount of cardmember purchases, balance transfers and cash
advance activity.
Net accounts opened Includes originations, purchases and sales.
Merchant acquiring business Represents a business that processes bank card transactions for
merchants.
Bank card volume Represents the dollar amount of transactions processed for merchants.
Total transactions Represents the number of transactions and authorizations processed for
merchants.
160
Commercial Banking
Commercial Banking revenue comprises the following:
Lending
includes a variety of financing alternatives, which are primarily provided on a basis
secured by receivables, inventory, equipment, real estate or other assets. Products include term
loans, revolving lines of credit, bridge financing, asset-based structures and leases.
Treasury
services includes a broad range of products and services enabling clients to transfer,
invest and manage the receipt and disbursement of funds, while providing the related information
reporting. These products and services include U.S. dollar and multi-currency clearing, ACH,
lockbox, disbursement and reconciliation services, check deposits, other check and currency-related
services, trade finance and logistics solutions, commercial card, and deposit products, sweeps and
money market mutual funds.
Investment
banking products provide clients with sophisticated capital-raising alternatives, as
well as balance sheet and risk management tools through loan syndications, investment-grade debt,
asset-backed securities, private placements, high-yield bonds, equity underwriting, advisory,
interest rate derivatives, foreign exchange hedges and securities sales.
Description of selected business metrics within CB:
Liability
balances include deposits and deposits that are swept to on-balance sheet liabilities
such as commercial paper, federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase
agreements.
IB revenue, gross Represents total revenue related to investment banking products sold to CB
clients.
Treasury
& Securities Services
Treasury & Securities Services firmwide metrics include certain TSS product revenue and liability
balances reported in other lines of business related to customers who are also customers of those
other lines of business. In order to capture the firmwide impact of Treasury Services and TSS
products and revenue, management reviews firmwide metrics such as liability balances, revenue and
overhead ratios in assessing financial performance for TSS. Firmwide metrics are necessary, in
managements view, in order to understand the aggregate TSS business.
Description of selected business metrics within TSS:
Liability balances include deposits and deposits that are swept to on-balance sheet liabilities
such as commercial paper, federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase
agreements.
Asset
Management
Assets under management: Represent assets actively managed by Asset Management on behalf of
institutional, private banking, private client services and retail clients. Excludes assets managed
by American Century Companies, Inc., in which the Firm has a 43% ownership interest as of September
30, 2008.
Assets under supervision: Represent assets under management as well as custody, brokerage,
administration and deposit accounts.
Alternative assets: The following types of assets constitute alternative investments hedge
funds, currency, real estate and private equity.
AMs client segments comprise the following:
Institutional
brings comprehensive global investment services including asset management,
pension analytics, asset/liability management and active risk budgeting strategies to corporate
and public institutions, endowments, foundations, not-for-profit organizations and governments
worldwide.
Retail
provides worldwide investment management services and retirement planning and administration
through third-party and direct distribution of a full range of investment vehicles.
The Private Bank addresses every facet of wealth management for ultra-high-net-worth individuals
and families worldwide, including investment management, capital markets and risk management, tax
and estate planning, banking, capital raising and specialty-wealth advisory services.
Private Wealth Management offers high-net-worth individuals, families and business owners in the
U.S. comprehensive wealth management solutions, including investment management, capital markets
and risk management, tax and estate planning, banking and specialty-wealth advisory services.
Bear Stearns Brokerage
provides investment advice and wealth management services to high-net-worth
individuals, money managers and small corporations.
161
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
From time to time, the Firm has made and will make forward-looking statements. These
statements can be identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current
facts. Forward-looking statements often use words such as anticipate, target, expect,
estimate, intend, plan, goal, believe, or other words of similar meaning. Forward-looking
statements provide JPMorgan Chases current expectations or forecasts of future events,
circumstances, results or aspirations. JPMorgan Chases disclosures in this report contain
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of
1995. The Firm also may make forward-looking statements in its other documents filed or furnished
with the SEC. In addition, the Firms senior management may make forward-looking statements orally
to analysts, investors, representatives of the media and others.
All forward-looking statements are, by their nature, subject to risks and uncertainties, many of
which are beyond the Firms control. JPMorgan Chases actual future results may differ materially
from those set forth in its forward-looking statements. While there is no assurance that any list
of risks and uncertainties or risk factors is complete, below are certain factors which could cause
actual results to differ from those in the forward-looking statements.
|
|
local, regional and international business, economic and political conditions and
geopolitical events; |
|
|
|
changes in trade, monetary and fiscal policies and laws; |
|
|
|
securities and capital markets behavior, including changes in market liquidity and
volatility; |
|
|
|
changes in investor sentiment or consumer spending or saving behavior; |
|
|
|
ability of the Firm to manage effectively its liquidity; |
|
|
|
credit ratings assigned to the Firm or its subsidiaries; |
|
|
|
the Firms reputation; |
|
|
|
ability of the Firm to deal effectively with an economic slowdown or other economic or
market difficulty; |
|
|
|
technology changes instituted by the Firm, its counterparties or competitors; |
|
|
|
mergers and acquisitions, including the Firms ability to integrate acquisitions; |
|
|
|
ability of the Firm to develop new products and services; |
|
|
|
acceptance of the Firms new and existing products and services by the marketplace and the
ability of the Firm to increase market share; |
|
|
|
ability of the Firm to attract and retain employees; |
|
|
|
ability of the Firm to control expense; |
|
|
|
competitive pressures; |
|
|
|
changes in the credit quality of the Firms customers; |
|
|
adequacy of the Firms risk management framework; |
|
|
|
changes in laws and regulatory requirements or adverse judicial proceedings; |
|
|
|
changes in applicable accounting policies; |
|
|
|
ability of the Firm to determine accurate values of certain assets and liabilities; |
|
|
occurrence of natural or man-made disasters or calamities or conflicts, including any
effect of any such disasters, calamities or conflicts on the Firms power generation
facilities and the Firms other commodity-related activities; |
|
|
|
the other risks and uncertainties detailed in Part I, Item 1A: Risk Factors in the Firms
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, Part II, Item 1A: Risk
Factors in the Firms Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 and
June 30, 2008, and in Item 1A: Risk Factors in this Form 10-Q. |
162
Any forward-looking statements made by or on behalf of the Firm speak only as of the date they are
made and JPMorgan Chase does not undertake to update forward-looking statements to reflect the
impact of circumstances or events that arise after the date the forward-looking statement was made.
The reader should, however, consult any further disclosures of a forward-looking nature the Firm
may make in any subsequent Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q or Current
Reports on Form 8-K.
Item 3
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
For a discussion of the quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk, see the Market
Risk Management section of the MD&A on pages 8084 of this Form 10-Q.
Item 4
Controls and Procedures
As of the end of the period covered by this report, an evaluation was carried out under the
supervision and with the participation of the Firms management, including its Chairman and Chief
Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls
and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based upon
that evaluation, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer concluded
that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective. See Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 for the
Certification statements issued by the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial
Officer.
The Firm is committed to maintaining high standards of internal control over financial reporting.
Nevertheless, because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may
not prevent or detect misstatements.
On September 25, 2008, the Firm acquired all deposits, assets and certain liabilities of Washington
Mutuals banking operations from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for a cash payment of
$1.9 billion. The internal control over financial reporting of Washington Mutuals banking
operations was excluded from the evaluation of effectiveness of the Firms disclosure controls and
procedures as of the period end covered by this report because it was acquired at the end of the
period covered by this report. The acquired banking operations of Washington Mutual represents
16% of total consolidated deposits, 12% of total consolidated assets, and less than 1% of
total consolidated revenue as of and for the period covered by this report.
Part II Other Information
Item 1 Legal Proceedings
The following information supplements and amends the disclosure set forth under Part 1, Item 3
Legal Proceedings in the Firms 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K, Part II, Item 1 Legal
Proceedings in the Firms Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ending March 31,
2008, and Part II, Item 1 Legal Proceedings in the Firms Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the
quarterly period ending June 30, 2008 (the Firms SEC filings).
Enron Litigation. As previously reported, the Firm agreed to settle the lead class action
litigation brought on behalf of purchasers of Enron securities, captioned Newby v. Enron Corp., for
$2.2 billion (pretax), with certain adjustments including interest. On September 8, 2008, the court
approved the plan of allocation in connection with the Newby settlement and, on October 16, 2008,
the Firm funded the Newby settlement. On October 15, 2008, the United States Court of Appeals for
the Second Circuit (the Second Circuit) issued a summary order affirming the dismissal by the
District Court of the shareholder derivative action filed against current and former directors of
JPMorgan Chase. On October 20, 2008, the Second Circuit heard oral argument on plaintiffs appeal
of the District Courts dismissal of the consolidated class action lawsuit brought by shareholders
of the Firm alleging federal securities violations. Oral argument of plaintiffs appeal of the
District Courts dismissal of the putative class action on behalf of JPMorgan Chase employees who
participated in the Firms 401(k) plan, alleging claims under the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act (ERISA) against the Firm, its directors and named officers, is now scheduled for
November 21, 2008 in front of the Second Circuit. Oral argument
on the Firms appeal of the New
York Supreme Courts denial of its motion to dismiss plaintiffs complaint alleging breach of
contract and breach of fiduciary duty in connection with an indenture between JPMorgan Chase and
Enron, is scheduled for November 20, 2008 in front of the New York Supreme Court Appellate
Division.
In re JPMorgan Chase Cash Balance Litigation. The cash balance plan litigations have been
reassigned to Judge Denise L. Cote. On the basis of the Second
Circuits decision in Hirt, the Firm
filed a motion for partial judgment on the pleadings, for dismissal with prejudice of plaintiffs
age discrimination claim. Plaintiffs have filed a motion to amend the definition of the class
previously certified by Judge Baer to include former employees who received lump sum distributions
of their benefits and to encompass claims for alleged inadequate notice of the 1989 conversion of
the retirement plan of the former Chase Manhattan Bank (one of the predecessors to the current
Plan) to a cash balance plan. Judge Cote has set the notice claims that were previously certified
by Judge Baer for class action treatment for a bench trial commencing on March 2, 2009.
163
Interchange Litigation. The plaintiffs have filed a brief seeking class certification; the
defendants have opposed that motion and await the plaintiffs reply. Washington Mutual Bank is one
of the named defendants in the Interchange Litigation.
GIC Investigations and Litigations. As previously reported, the Department of Justices Antitrust
Division and the Securities and Exchange Commission have been investigating JPMorgan Chase and Bear
Stearns for possible antitrust and securities violations in connection with the bidding or sale of
guaranteed investment contracts and derivatives to municipal issuers. A group of state attorney
generals has opened an investigation into the same underlying conduct. JPMorgan Chase has been
cooperating with those investigations. In the coordinated MDL antitrust proceeding in the Southern
District of New York interim lead counsel filed a consolidated class action complaint on August 20,
2008. Defendants moved to dismiss that complaint on October 20, 2008. Plaintiffs opposition is due
on November 20, 2008. In addition to the actions by the City of Los Angeles and the City of
Stockton, the Firm and Bear Stearns have been named in other actions brought by municipalities in
connection with the bidding or sale of guaranteed investment contracts or derivatives.
Auction Rate Securities Investigations and Litigation. On August 13, 2008, the Firm, on behalf of
itself and affiliates, agreed to a settlement in principle with the New York Attorney Generals
Office which provided, among other things, that the Firm would offer to purchase at par certain
auction rate securities purchased from J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., Chase Investment Services Corp.
and Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc. by individual investors and by charities and small- to medium-sized
businesses with account values of up to $10 million no later than November 12, 2008. On August 14,
2008, the Firm agreed to a substantively similar settlement in principle with the Office of
Financial Regulation for the State of Florida and The North American Securities Administrators
Association Task Force, which agreed to recommend approval of the settlement to all remaining
states, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands. The agreements in principle provide for the
payment of penalties totaling $25 million to New York and the other states.
On October 17 2008, following an investigation by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority
(FINRA) into the auction rate securities practices of
WaMu Investments, Inc. (WaMu), WaMu
resolved the matter by submitting a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent to FINRA. Without
admitting or denying the findings, WaMu consented to findings by FINRA that WaMu violated certain
NASD Rules relating to communications with the public and supervisory procedures and among other
things, agreed to offer to purchase at par auction rate securities purchased by certain WaMu
customers and to pay a fine of $250,000.
Judge Berman of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York consolidated
the two putative securities class actions and appointed Lead Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel involving
the sale of auction rate securities. Additionally, the Firm is the subject of two putative
antitrust class actions in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York,
which actions allege that the Firm, in collusion with numerous other financial institution
defendants, caused a perception among investors that auction rate securities were a liquid, cash
equivalent investment and pulled the plug on the purported auction rate securities market.
Bear Stearns Merger Litigation. The defendants motion for summary judgment was argued during
August 2008. The motion has not yet been decided.
Bear Stearns Shareholder Litigation and Related Matters. On August 18, 2008 the Judicial Panel on
Multidistrict Litigation (MDL Panel) issued a Transfer Order joining for pretrial purposes
fifteen securities and ERISA actions sharing allegations concerning whether Bear Stearns and
certain of its current and former officers and directors knowingly made material misstatements or
omissions concerning the companys financial health that misled investors and caused investor
losses when the companys stock price fell in March 2008. A consolidated action denominated as a
shareholders derivative lawsuit was also the subject of the Transfer order.
Bear Stearns Hedge Fund Matters. On October 6, 2008, BSAM and Bear Stearns defendants filed a
motion to dismiss the lawsuit filed by Barclays Bank related to the Enhanced Leverage Fund.
In addition, Bank of America and Banc of America Securities LLC (together BofA) filed a lawsuit
in the United States District Court of the Southern District of New York alleging breach of
contract and fraud against BSAM and certain Bear Stearns defendants in connection with a May 2007
$4 billion dollar securitization, known as a
CDO-squared, for which BSAM served as collateral
manager. This securitization was composed of certain CDO holdings that were purchased by BofA
from the High Grade Fund and the Enhanced Leverage Fund.
164
In addition to the various cases, proceedings and investigations discussed above, JPMorgan Chase
and its subsidiaries are named as defendants or otherwise involved in a number of other legal
actions and governmental proceedings arising in connection with their businesses. Additional
actions, investigations or proceedings may be initiated from time to time in the future. In view of
the inherent difficulty of predicting the outcome of legal matters, particularly where the
claimants seek very large or indeterminate damages, or where the cases present novel legal
theories, involve a large number of parties or are in early stages of discovery, the Firm cannot
state with confidence what the eventual outcome of these pending matters will be, what the timing
of the ultimate resolution of these matters will be or what the eventual loss, fines, penalties or
impact related to each pending matter may be. JPMorgan Chase believes, based upon its current
knowledge, after consultation with counsel and after taking into account its current litigation
reserves, that the outcome of the legal actions, proceedings and investigations currently pending
against it should not have a material, adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition of
the Firm. However, in light of the uncertainties involved in such proceedings, actions and
investigations, there is no assurance that the ultimate resolution of these matters will not
significantly exceed the reserves currently accrued by the Firm; as a result, the outcome of a
particular matter may be material to JPMorgan Chases operating results for a particular period,
depending upon, among other factors, the size of the loss or liability imposed and the level of
JPMorgan Chases income for that period.
For a discussion of certain risk factors affecting the Firm, see Part I, Item 1A: Risk Factors, on
pages 46 of JPMorgan Chases 2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K, Part II, Item 1A: Risk Factors, on
pages 117-118 of JPMorgan Chases Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31,
2008 and June 30, 2008, and Forward-Looking Statements on page 135 of this Form 10-Q. Additionally,
below are outlined some of the more important risk factors relating to JPMorgan Chases acquisition
of Bear Stearns that could materially affect the Firms financial condition and operations.
The Firm may fail to realize any benefits from the merger with Bear Stearns and the acquisition of
Washington Mutuals banking operations (collectively herein referred to as the Acquisitions) and
may incur unanticipated losses related to such Acquisitions.
In conjunction with the Bear Stearns merger, in June 2008, the Federal Reserve Bank of New York
(the FRBNY) took control, through a limited liability company (LLC) formed for this purpose, of
a portfolio of $30 billion in assets acquired from Bear Stearns, based upon the value of the
portfolio as of March 14, 2008. The assets of the LLC were funded by a $28.85 billion term loan
from the FRBNY, and a $1.15 billion subordinated note from JPMorgan Chase. The JPMorgan Chase note
is subordinated to the FRBNY loan and will bear the first $1.15 billion of any losses of the
portfolio. Any remaining assets in the portfolio after repayment of the FRBNY loan, the JPMorgan
Chase note and the expense of the LLC, will be for the account of the FRBNY. There can be no
assurance that JPMorgan Chase will not incur this $1.15 billion in losses.
Given the continued market volatility and uncertainty, JPMorgan Chase may continue to experience
increased credit costs or need to take additional markdowns and reserves on the assets acquired in
the Acquisitions that could negatively affect its financial condition and results of operations in
the future.
In addition, the success of the Acquisitions will depend, in part, on JPMorgan Chases ability to
successfully integrate the acquired businesses into its own. As with any acquisition, there may be
business disruptions that cause the Firm to lose customers or cause customers to remove their
accounts from the Firm and move their business to competing financial institutions. It is possible
that the integration process related to the Acquisitions could result in the disruption of the
Firms ongoing businesses or inconsistencies in standards, controls, procedures and policies that
could adversely affect JPMorgan Chases ability to maintain relationships with clients, customers,
depositors and employees. The loss of key employees could adversely affect JPMorgan Chases ability
to successfully conduct its business, which could have an adverse effect on the Firms financial
results. Integration efforts could also divert management attention and
165
resources, which could adversely affect the Firms operations or results. If JPMorgan Chase
experiences difficulties with the integration process, the anticipated benefits of the Acquisitions
may not be realized fully or at all or may take longer to realize than expected.
Current market developments may adversely affect JPMorgan Chases business and results of
operations.
Dramatic declines in the housing market during the prior year, with falling home prices and
increasing foreclosures and unemployment, have resulted in significant write-downs of asset values
by financial institutions, including government-sponsored entities and major commercial and
investment banks. These write-downs, initially of mortgage-backed
securities but spreading to
credit default swaps and other derivative securities, have caused many financial institutions to
seek additional capital, to merge with larger and stronger institutions and, in some cases, to
fail. Recently, the volatility and disruption has reached unprecedented levels. Reflecting concern
about the stability of the financial markets generally and the strength of counterparties, many
lenders and institutional investors have reduced, and in some cases, ceased to provide funding to
borrowers, including other financial institutions. The resulting lack of available credit, lack of
confidence in the financial sector, increased volatility in the financial markets and reduced
business activity could materially and adversely affect the Firms business, financial condition,
results of operations and on the Firms ability to obtain and manage its liquidity.
The soundness of other financial institutions could adversely affect JPMorgan Chase.
Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty, or
other relationships. JPMorgan Chase has exposure to many different industries and counterparties,
and the Firm routinely executes transactions with counterparties in the financial services
industry, including brokers and dealers, commercial banks, investment banks, mutual and hedge
funds, and other institutional clients. Many of these transactions expose the Firm to credit risk
in the event of default of the Firms counterparty or client. The Firms credit risk also may be
exacerbated when the collateral held by it cannot be realized upon or is liquidated at prices not
sufficient to recover the full amount of the loan or derivative exposure due the Firm. There is no
assurance that any such losses would not materially and adversely affect the Firms results of
operations or earnings.
On
September 15, 2008, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (LBHI) filed a voluntary petition for relief
under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Code (the Bankruptcy Code) in the United States
Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the Court), and thereafter several of its
subsidiaries also filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in
the Court (LBHI and such subsidiaries collectively, Lehman). On September 19, 2008, a liquidation
case under the Securities Investor Protection Act (SIPA) was commenced in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of New York for Lehman Brothers Inc. (LBI), LBHIs U.S. broker-dealer
subsidiary, and the Court now presides over the LBI SIPA liquidation case. JPMorgan Chase was LBIs
clearing bank and is the largest secured creditor in the Lehman and LBI cases, according to
Lehmans schedules. The Firm anticipates that claims may be asserted against the Firm and/or the
Firms security interests, including by the LBHI Creditors Committee, the SIPA Trustee appointed in
the LBI liquidation case, the principal acquiror of LBIs
assets, and others in connection with the Lehman and LBI cases. The Firm intends to defend itself
against any such claims. There can be no assurance as to whether such claims will have a
significant impact on the Firms financial condition.
JPMorgan Chase incurs credit risk when it loans money, commits to loan money or enters into a
letter of credit or other contract with a counterparty.
A number of the Firms products expose it to credit risk, including loans, leases and lending
commitments, derivatives, trading account assets and assets held-for-sale. As one of the nations
largest lenders, the credit quality of the Firms portfolio can have a significant impact on its
earnings. The Firm estimates and establishes reserves for credit risks and potential credit losses
inherent in its credit exposure (including unfunded lending commitments). This process, which is
critical to the Firms financial results and condition, requires difficult, subjective and complex
judgments, including forecasts of how these economic conditions might
impair the ability of the Firms
borrowers to repay their loans. As is the case with any such assessments, there is always the
chance that the Firm will fail to identify the proper factors or that it will fail to accurately
estimate the impact of factors that the Firm identifies.
In
addition, current market developments have affected consumer confidence levels which may result
in adverse changes in payment patterns. Increased delinquencies and default rates may impact the
Firms charge-offs and allowances for loan losses. Deterioration in the quality of the Firms
credit portfolio could have a material adverse effect on the Firms capital, financial condition
and results of operations.
JPMorgan Chase operates within a highly regulated industry and its business and results are
significantly affected by the regulations to which it is subject.
JPMorgan Chase operates within a highly regulated environment. In light of the current conditions
in the U.S. financial markets and economy, Congress and regulators have increased their focus on
the regulation of the financial services industry. The regulations to which the Firm is now
subject, and may in the future become subject, will continue to have a significant impact on the
Firms operations and the degree to which it can grow and be profitable.
166
If the Firm does not comply with governmental regulations, it may be subject to fines, penalties or
material restrictions on its businesses in the jurisdiction where the violation occurred. In recent
years, regulatory oversight and enforcement have increased substantially, imposing additional costs
and increasing the potential risks associated with the Firms operations. If this regulatory trend
continues, it could adversely affect the Firms operations and, in turn, its financial results. In
addition, adverse publicity and damage to the Firms reputation arising from the failure or
perceived failure to comply with legal, regulatory or contractual requirements could affect its
ability to attract and retain customers or to maintain access to capital markets, which could
adversely affect the Firms financial condition.
The fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies could have a material
adverse effect on the Firms earnings.
The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System regulates the supply of money and credit in
the United States. Its policies determine in large part the cost of funds for lending and investing
and the return earned on those loans and investments. They also can materially decrease the value
of financial assets that the Firm holds, such as debt securities and MSRs. Its policies also can
adversely affect borrowers, potentially increasing the risk that they may fail to repay their
loans. Changes in Federal Reserve policies are beyond the Firms control and consequently,
the impact of these changes on the Firms activities and results of operations is difficult to
predict.
The
impact on JPMorgan Chase of recently enacted legislation cannot be
predicted at this time.
On October 3, 2008, the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (the EESA) was signed into
law. The purpose of the EESA is to stabilize and provide liquidity to the U.S. financial markets.
There can be no assurance, however, as to the actual impact that the EESA and its implementing
regulations, or any other governmental program, will have on the financial markets. The failure of
the financial markets to stabilize and a continuation or worsening of current financial market
conditions could materially and adversely affect the Firms business, financial condition, results
of operations, access to credit or the trading price of the Firms common stock.
In
addition, participation in specific programs promulgated under or
pursuant to the EESA may subject the Firm to additional restrictions. For example,
participation in the Capital Purchase Program will limit (without the consent of the Department of
Treasury) the Firms ability to increase its dividend or to repurchase its common stock for so long
as any securities issued under such program remain outstanding. It will also subject the Firm to
additional executive compensation restrictions. Similarly, participation in the FDIC Temporary
Liquidity Guarantee Program likely will require the payment of additional insurance premiums to the
FDIC. JPMorgan Chase may be required to pay significantly higher FDIC premiums even if it does not
participate in the FDIC Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program because market developments have
significantly depleted the insurance fund of the FDIC and reduced the ratio of reserves to insured
deposits. The costs of participating or not participating in any such programs, and the effect on
the Firms results of operations, cannot reliably be determined at this time.
Item 2 Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
Pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement dated March 24, 2008 between JPMorgan Chase and Bear
Stearns, on April 8, 2008, 21 million newly issued shares of JPMorgan Chase common stock were issued to Bear
Stearns in a transaction that was exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933,
pursuant to Section 4(2) thereof, in exchange for 95 million newly issued shares of Bear Stearns
common stock (or 39.5% of Bear Stearns common stock after giving effect to the issuance). Upon the
consummation of the Bear Stearns merger, on May 30, 2008, the 21 million shares of JPMorgan Chase
common stock and 95 million shares of Bear Stearns common stock were cancelled. For a further
discussion of this transaction, see Note 2 on pages 8083 of this Form 10-Q.
Pursuant to the U.S. Department of the Treasurys (the U.S. Treasury) Capital Purchase Program,
on October 28, 2008, the Firm issued to the U.S. Treasury in exchange for aggregate consideration
of $25.0 billion, (i) 2.5 million shares of the
Firms Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, Series
K, par value $1 and liquidation preference $10,000 per share (and
$25.0 billion liquidation
preference in the aggregate) (the Series K Preferred Stock) and (ii) a warrant to purchase
88,401,697 shares of the Firms common stock, at an exercise price of $42.42 per share, subject to
certain anti-dilution and other adjustments.
On April 17, 2007, the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to $10.0 billion of the
Firms common shares. During the third quarter and first nine months of 2008, under the current
$10.0 billion stock repurchase program, the Firm did not repurchase any shares. During the third
quarter and first nine months of 2007, under the respective stock repurchase programs then in
effect, the Firm repurchased a total of 47 million and 165 million shares for $2.1 billion and
167
$8.0 billion at an average price per share of $45.42 and $48.67, respectively. As of September 30,
2008, $6.2 billion of authorized repurchase capacity remained under the current stock repurchase
program.
The Firm has determined that it may, from time to time, enter into written trading plans under Rule
10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to facilitate the repurchase of common stock in
accordance with the repurchase program. A Rule 10b5-1 repurchase plan allows the Firm to repurchase
shares during periods when it would not otherwise be repurchasing common stock, for example during
internal trading black-out periods. All purchases under a Rule 10b5-1 plan must be made according
to a predefined plan that is established when the Firm is not aware of material nonpublic
information.
The Purchase Agreement concerning the issuance and sale of the Series K Preferred Stock to the U.S.
Treasury contains limitations on the Firms ability to repurchase its capital stock. See the stock
repurchase restrictions discussion on page 56 of this Form 10-Q.
Participants in the Firms stock-based incentive plans may have shares withheld to cover income
taxes. Shares withheld to pay income taxes are repurchased pursuant to the terms of the applicable
plan and not under the Firms share repurchase program. Shares repurchased pursuant to these plans
during the third quarter and first nine months of 2008 were as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
For the nine months ended |
|
Total shares |
|
|
price paid |
|
September 30, 2008 |
|
repurchased |
|
|
per share |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First quarter |
|
|
2,043 |
|
|
$ |
45.61 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second quarter |
|
|
7,041 |
|
|
|
47.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July |
|
|
24,120 |
|
|
|
31.01 |
|
August |
|
|
67 |
|
|
|
38.70 |
|
September |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
41.13 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third quarter |
|
|
24,214 |
|
|
|
31.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-to-date |
|
|
33,298 |
|
|
$ |
35.36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Item 3 |
Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
|
|
None |
|
|
|
Item 4 |
Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
|
|
None |
|
|
|
Item 5 |
Other Information |
|
|
None |
|
|
|
Item 6 |
Exhibits |
|
|
10.1Purchase and Assumption Agreement Whole Bank, dated as of September 25, 2008, by and among the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Receiver of Washington Mutual Bank, Henderson, Nevada, the
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and JPMorgan Chase Bank,
National Association |
|
|
31.1Certification |
|
|
31.2Certification |
|
|
32Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
168
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Registrant) |
|
|
|
|
|
Date: November 6, 2008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By
|
|
/s/ Louis Rauchenberger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Louis Rauchenberger |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Managing Director and Controller
[Principal Accounting Officer] |
169
INDEX TO EXHIBITS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXHIBIT NO. |
|
EXHIBITS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Purchase and Assumption Agreement
Whole Bank, dated as of September 25,
2008, by and among the Federal Deposit
Insurance Corporation, Receiver of
Washington Mutual Bank, Henderson, Nevada,
the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National
Association
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following exhibit shall not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that Section. In addition,
Exhibit No. 32 shall not be deemed incorporated into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933
or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32 |
|
|
Certification Pursuant to Section 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
170