10-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-K
|
|
|
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2008
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|
|
For the transition period
from to
|
Commission file
number 1-8787
American International Group,
Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as
specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
13-2592361
|
(State or other jurisdiction
of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
70 Pine Street, New York, New York
|
|
10270
|
(Address of principal executive
offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
Registrants
telephone number, including area code
(212) 770-7000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
|
Common Stock, Par Value $2.50 Per Share
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
5.75%
Series A-2
Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
4.875%
Series A-3
Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
6.45%
Series A-4
Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
7.70%
Series A-5
Junior Subordinated Debentures
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Corporate Units (composed of stock purchase contracts and junior
subordinated debentures)
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
NIKKEI
225®
Index Market Index Target-Term
Securities®
due January 5, 2011
|
|
NYSE Arca
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Act.
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of the voting and nonvoting common
equity held by nonaffiliates of the registrant computed by
reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold
of $26.46 as of June 30, 2008 (the last business day of the
registrants most recently completed second fiscal
quarter), was approximately $61,753,000,000.
As of January 30, 2009, there were outstanding
2,690,747,320 shares of Common Stock, $2.50 par value
per share, of the registrant.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
|
|
|
Document of the Registrant
|
|
Form 10-K Reference Locations
|
|
Portions of the registrants definitive proxy statement for
the
2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
|
|
Part III, Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14
|
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Table of
Contents
2 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Part I
American International Group, Inc. (AIG), a Delaware
corporation, is a holding company which, through its
subsidiaries, is engaged in a broad range of insurance and
insurance-related activities in the United States and abroad.
AIGs primary activities include both General Insurance and
Life Insurance & Retirement Services operations. Other
significant activities include Financial Services and Asset
Management.
Liquidity
Events and Transactions with the NY Fed and the United
States Department of the Treasury
Liquidity
Entering the Third Quarter of 2008
AIG parent entered the third quarter of 2008 with
$17.6 billion of cash and cash equivalents, including the
remaining proceeds from the issuance of $20 billion of
common stock, equity units, and junior subordinated debt
securities in May 2008. In addition, AIGs securities
lending collateral pool held $10.4 billion of cash and
other short-term investments. On August 18, 2008, AIG
raised $3.25 billion through the issuance of
8.25% Notes Due 2018.
Strategic
Review and Proposed Liquidity Measures
From mid-July and throughout August 2008, AIGs then Chief
Executive Officer, Robert Willumstad, was engaged in a strategic
review of AIGs businesses.
During this time period, AIG was engaged in a review of measures
to address the liquidity concerns in AIGs securities
lending portfolio and to address the ongoing collateral calls
with respect to the AIG Financial Products Corp. and AIG
Trading Group Inc. and their respective subsidiaries
(collectively, AIGFP) super senior multi-sector credit default
swap portfolio, which at July 31, 2008 totaled
$16.1 billion. To facilitate this process, AIG asked a
number of investment banking firms to discuss possible solutions
to these issues. In late August, AIG engaged J.P. Morgan
Securities, Inc. (J.P. Morgan) to assist in developing
alternatives, including a potential additional capital raise.
Continuing
Liquidity Pressures
Historically, under AIGs securities lending program, cash
collateral was received from borrowers and invested by AIG
primarily in fixed maturity securities to earn a spread. AIG had
received cash collateral from borrowers of 100 to
102 percent of the value of the loaned securities. In light
of more favorable terms offered by other lenders of securities,
AIG accepted cash advanced by borrowers of less than the
102 percent historically required by insurance regulators.
Under an agreement with its insurance company subsidiaries
participating in the securities lending program, AIG parent
deposited collateral in an amount sufficient to address the
deficit. AIG parent also deposited amounts into the collateral
pool to offset losses realized by the pool in connection with
sales of impaired securities. Aggregate deposits by AIG parent
to or for the benefit of the securities lending collateral pool
through August 31, 2008 totaled $3.3 billion.
In addition, from July 1, 2008 to August 31, 2008, the
continuing decline in value of the super senior collateralized
debt obligation (CDO) securities protected by AIGFPs super
senior credit default swap portfolio, together with ratings
downgrades of such CDO securities, resulted in AIGFP posting
additional collateral in an aggregate net amount of
$5.9 billion.
By the beginning of September 2008, these collateral postings
and securities lending requirements were placing increasing
stress on AIG parents liquidity.
Rating
Agencies
In early September 2008, AIG met with the representatives of the
principal rating agencies to discuss
Mr. Willumstads
strategic review as well as the liquidity issues arising from
AIGs securities lending program and AIGFPs super
senior multi-sector CDO credit default swap portfolio. On
Friday, September 12, 2008, Standard &
Poors, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
(S&P), placed AIG on CreditWatch with negative
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 3
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
implications and noted that upon completion of its review, the
agency could affirm AIG parents current rating of AA- or
lower the rating by one to three notches. AIG understood that
both S&P and Moodys Investors Service (Moodys)
would re-evaluate AIGs ratings early in the week of
September 15, 2008. Also on Friday, September 12,
2008, AIGs subsidiaries, International Lease Finance
Corporation (ILFC) and American General Finance, Inc. (AGF),
were unable to replace all of their maturing commercial paper
with new issuances of commercial paper. As a result, AIG
advanced loans to these subsidiaries to meet their commercial
paper obligations.
The
Accelerated Capital Raise Attempt
As a result of S&Ps action, AIG accelerated the
process of attempting to raise additional capital and over the
weekend of September 13 and 14, 2008 discussed potential capital
injections and other liquidity measures with private equity
firms, sovereign wealth funds and other potential investors. AIG
kept the United States Department of the Treasury and the NY Fed
informed of these efforts. AIG also engaged Blackstone Advisory
Services LP to assist in developing alternatives, including a
potential additional capital raise. Despite offering a number of
different structures through this process, AIG did not receive a
proposal it could act upon in a timely fashion. AIGs
difficulty in this regard resulted in part from the dramatic
decline in its common stock price from $22.76 on
September 8, 2008 to $12.14 on September 12, 2008.
This decrease in stock price made it unlikely that AIG would be
able to raise the large amounts of capital that would be
necessary if AIGs long-term debt ratings were downgraded.
AIG
Attempts to Enter into a Syndicated Secured Lending
Facility
On Monday, September 15, 2008, AIG was again unable to
access the commercial paper market for its primary commercial
paper programs, AIG Funding, ILFC and AGF. Payments under the
programs totaled $2.2 billion for the day, and AIG advanced
loans to ILFC and AGF to meet their funding obligations. In
addition, AIG experienced returns under its securities lending
programs which led to cash payments of $5.2 billion to
securities lending counterparts on that day.
On Monday morning, September 15, 2008, AIG met with
representatives of Goldman, Sachs & Co.,
J.P. Morgan and the NY Fed to discuss the creation of a
$75 billion secured lending facility to be syndicated among
a number of large financial institutions. The facility was
intended to act as a bridge loan to meet AIG parents
liquidity needs until AIG could sell sufficient assets to
stabilize and enhance its liquidity position. Goldman,
Sachs & Co. and J.P. Morgan immediately commenced
syndication efforts.
The
Rating Agencies Downgrade AIGs Long-Term Debt
Rating
In the late afternoon of September 15, 2008, S&P
downgraded AIGs long-term debt rating by three notches,
Moodys downgraded AIGs long-term debt rating by two
notches and Fitch Ratings (Fitch) downgraded AIGs
long-term debt rating by two notches. As a consequence of the
rating actions, AIGFP estimated that it would need in excess of
$20 billion in order to fund additional collateral demands
and transaction termination payments in a short period of time.
Subsequently, in a period of approximately 15 days
following the rating actions, AIGFP was required to fund
approximately $32 billion, reflecting not only the effect
of the rating actions but also changes in market values and
other factors.
The
Private Sector Solution Fails
By Tuesday morning, September 16, 2008, it had become
apparent that Goldman, Sachs & Co. and
J.P. Morgan were unable to syndicate a lending facility.
Moreover, the downgrades, combined with a steep drop in
AIGs common stock price to $4.76 on September 15,
2008, had resulted in counterparties withholding payments from
AIG and refusing to transact with AIG even on a secured
short-term basis. As a result, AIG was unable to borrow in the
short-term lending markets. To provide liquidity, on Tuesday,
September 16, 2008 both ILFC and AGF drew down on their
existing revolving credit facilities, resulting in borrowings of
approximately $6.5 billion and $4.6 billion,
respectively.
Also, on September 16, 2008, AIG was notified by its
insurance regulators that it would no longer be permitted to
borrow funds from its insurance company subsidiaries under a
revolving credit facility that AIG maintained with certain of
its insurance subsidiaries acting as lenders. Subsequently, the
insurance regulators required AIG to repay
4 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
any outstanding loans under that facility and to terminate it.
The intercompany facility was terminated effective
September 22, 2008.
Fed
Credit Agreement
By early Tuesday afternoon on September 16, 2008, it was
clear that AIG had no viable private sector solution to its
liquidity issues. At this point, AIG received the terms of a
secured lending agreement that the NY Fed was prepared to
provide. AIG estimated that it had an immediate need for cash in
excess of its available liquid resources. That night, AIGs
Board of Directors approved borrowing from the NY Fed based on a
term sheet that set forth the terms of the secured credit
agreement and related equity participation. Over the next six
days, AIG elected Edward M. Liddy Director, Chairman and CEO,
replacing Robert Willumstad in those positions, and negotiated a
definitive credit agreement with the NY Fed and borrowed, on a
secured basis, approximately $37 billion from the NY Fed
before formally entering into the Credit Agreement, dated as of
September 22, 2008 (as amended, the Fed Credit Agreement)
between AIG and the NY Fed, which established the credit
facility (Fed Facility).
On September 22, 2008, AIG entered into the Fed Credit
Agreement in the form of a two-year secured loan and a Guarantee
and Pledge Agreement (the Pledge Agreement) with the NY Fed. See
Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for more
information regarding the terms of and borrowings under the Fed
Credit Agreement and subsequent amendments thereto.
AIGs
Strategy for Stabilization and Repayment of the Fed
Facility
In October 2008, AIG announced a restructuring of its
operations, which contemplated retaining its U.S. property
and casualty and foreign general insurance businesses and a
continuing ownership interest in certain of its foreign life
insurance operations while exploring disposition opportunities
for its remaining businesses. Proceeds from sales of these
assets are contractually required to be applied as mandatory
prepayments pursuant to the terms of the Fed Credit Agreement.
Also in October 2008, AIGFP began unwinding its businesses and
portfolios. AIGFP is now entering into new derivative
transactions only to maintain its current portfolio, reduce risk
and hedge the currency and interest rate risks associated with
its affiliated businesses. As part of its orderly wind-down,
AIGFP is also opportunistically terminating contracts. Due to
the long-term duration of AIGFPs derivative contracts and
the complexity of AIGFPs portfolio, AIG expects that an
orderly wind-down of AIGFP will take a substantial period of
time.
On November 9, 2008, AIG, the NY Fed and the United States
Department of the Treasury announced a set of transactions that
were implemented during the fourth quarter of 2008 pursuant to
which, among other actions, AIG issued $40 billion of
fixed-rate cumulative perpetual serial preferred stock
(Series D Preferred Stock) to the United States Department
of the Treasury, terminated $62 billion of credit default
swaps written by AIGFP and resolved and terminated its
U.S. securities lending program.
On March 2, 2009, AIG, the NY Fed and the United States
Department of the Treasury announced agreements in principle to
modify the terms of the Fed Credit Agreement and the
Series D Preferred Stock and to provide a $30 billion
equity capital commitment facility. The parties also announced
their intention to take a number of other actions intended to
strengthen AIGs capital position, enhance its liquidity,
reduce its borrowing costs and facilitate AIGs asset
disposition program.
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Liquidity and
Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a
further discussion of this strategy.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 5
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Principal
Business Units
The principal business units in each of AIGs operating
segments during 2008 are shown below. For information on
AIGs business segments, see Note 3 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
General
Insurance
American Home Assurance Company (American Home)
National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Pa.
(National Union)
New Hampshire Insurance Company (New Hampshire)
Lexington Insurance Company (Lexington)
The Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company
(HSB)1
Transatlantic Reinsurance Company
United Guaranty Residential Insurance Company
American International Underwriters Overseas, Ltd. (AIUO)
AIU Insurance Company (AIUI)
Life
Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
|
Domestic:
|
|
Foreign:
|
|
American General Life Insurance Company (AIG American General)
|
|
American Life Insurance Company (ALICO)
|
American General Life and Accident Insurance Company (AGLA)
|
|
AIG Star Life Insurance Co., Ltd. (AIG Star Life)
|
The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York
(USLIFE)
|
|
AIG Edison Life Insurance Company (AIG Edison Life)
|
The Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company (VALIC)
|
|
American International Assurance Company, Limited, together with
American International Assurance Company (Bermuda) Limited (AIA)
|
AIG Annuity Insurance Company (AIG Annuity)
|
|
American International Reinsurance Company Limited (AIRCO)
|
AIG SunAmerica Life Assurance Company (AIG SunAmerica)
|
|
Nan Shan Life Insurance Company, Ltd. (Nan Shan)
|
|
|
The Philippine American Life and General Insurance Company
(Philamlife)
|
Financial
Services
International Lease Finance Corporation (ILFC)
AIG Financial Products Corp. and AIG Trading Group Inc. and
their respective subsidiaries
American General Finance, Inc. (AGF)
AIG Consumer Finance Group, Inc. (AIGCFG)
Imperial A.I. Credit Companies (A.I. Credit)
Asset
Management
AIG SunAmerica Asset Management Corp. (SAAMCo)
AIG Global Asset Management Holdings Corp. and its subsidiaries
and affiliated companies (collectively, AIG Investments)
AIG Private Bank Ltd. (AIG Private
Bank)2
AIG Global Real Estate Investment Corp. (AIG Global Real Estate)
1 On
December 22, 2008, AIG entered into a contract to sell HSB
Group, Inc., the parent company of HSB, to Munich Re Group for
$742 million. Subject to satisfaction of certain closing
conditions, including regulatory approvals, AIG expects the sale
to close by the end of the first quarter of 2009.
2 On
December 1, 2008, AIG entered into a contract to sell AIG
Private Bank to Aabar Investments PJSC for $328 million.
Subject to satisfaction of certain closing conditions, including
regulatory approvals, AIG expects the sale to close by the end
of the first quarter of 2009.
6 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
At December 31, 2008, AIG and its subsidiaries had
approximately 116,000 employees.
AIGs Internet address for its corporate website is
www.aigcorporate.com. AIG makes available free of charge,
through the Investor Information section of AIGs corporate
website, Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
and Proxy Statements on Schedule 14A and amendments to
those reports or statements filed or furnished pursuant to
Section 13(a), 14(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) as soon as reasonably practicable
after such materials are electronically filed with, or furnished
to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). AIG also makes
available on its corporate website copies of the charters for
its Audit, Nominating and Corporate Governance and Compensation
and Management Resources Committees, as well as its Corporate
Governance Guidelines (which include Director Independence
Standards), Director, Executive Officer and Senior Financial
Officer Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, Employee Code of
Conduct and Related-Party Transactions Approval Policy. Except
for the documents specifically incorporated by reference into
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
information contained on AIGs website or that can be
accessed through its website is not incorporated by reference
into this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Throughout this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
AIG presents its operations in the way it believes will be most
meaningful, as well as most transparent. Certain of the
measurements used by AIG management are non-GAAP financial
measures under SEC rules and regulations. Statutory
underwriting profit (loss) is determined in accordance with
accounting principles prescribed by insurance regulatory
authorities. For an explanation of why AIG management considers
this non-GAAP measure useful to investors, see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations.
General
Insurance Operations
AIGs General Insurance subsidiaries are multiple line
companies writing substantially all lines of property and
casualty insurance and various personal lines both domestically
and abroad and constitute the AIG Property Casualty Group
(formerly known as Domestic General Insurance) and the Foreign
General Insurance Group.
AIG Property Casualty Group is comprised of Commercial
Insurance, Transatlantic, Personal Lines and Mortgage Guaranty
businesses.
AIG is diversified both in terms of classes of business and
geographic locations. In General Insurance, workers
compensation business is the largest class of business written
and represented approximately 11 percent of net premiums
written for the year ended December 31, 2008. During 2008,
9 percent, 5 percent and 5 percent of the direct
General Insurance premiums written (gross premiums less return
premiums and cancellations, excluding reinsurance assumed and
before deducting reinsurance ceded) were written in California,
New York and Texas, respectively. No other state or foreign
country accounted for more than five percent of such premiums.
The majority of AIGs General Insurance business is in the
casualty classes, which tend to involve longer periods of time
for the reporting and settling of claims. This may increase the
risk and uncertainty with respect to AIGs loss reserve
development.
Commercial
Insurance
AIGs primary property casualty division is Commercial
Insurance. Commercial Insurances business in the United
States and Canada is conducted through American Home, National
Union, Lexington, HSB and certain other General Insurance
company subsidiaries of AIG. During 2008, Commercial Insurance
accounted for 47 percent of AIGs General Insurance
net premiums written.
Commercial Insurance writes substantially all classes of
business insurance, accepting such business mainly from
insurance brokers. This provides Commercial Insurance the
opportunity to select specialized markets and retain
underwriting control. Any licensed broker is able to submit
business to Commercial Insurance without the traditional
agent-company contractual relationship, but such broker usually
has no authority to commit Commercial Insurance to accept a risk.
In addition to writing substantially all classes of business
insurance, including large commercial or industrial property
insurance, excess liability, inland marine, environmental,
workers compensation and excess and umbrella coverages,
Commercial Insurance offers many specialized forms of insurance
such as aviation, accident and health,
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 7
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
equipment breakdown, directors and officers liability
(D&O),
difference-in-conditions,
kidnap-ransom, export credit and political risk, and various
types of professional errors and omissions coverages. Also
included in Commercial Insurance are the operations of AIG Risk
Management, which provides insurance and risk management
programs for large corporate customers and is a leading provider
of customized structured insurance products, and AIG
Environmental, which focuses specifically on providing specialty
products to clients with environmental exposures. Lexington
writes surplus lines for risks on which conventional insurance
companies do not readily provide insurance coverage, either
because of complexity or because the coverage does not lend
itself to conventional contracts. The AIG Worldsource Division
introduces and coordinates AIGs products and services to
U.S.-based
multinational clients and foreign corporations doing business in
the U.S.
Transatlantic
Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. (Transatlantic) subsidiaries offer
reinsurance capacity on both a treaty and facultative basis both
in the United States and abroad. Transatlantic structures
programs for a full range of property and casualty products with
an emphasis on specialty risk. Transatlantic is a public company
owned 58.9 percent by AIG and therefore is included in
AIGs consolidated financial statements.
Personal
Lines
AIGs Personal Lines operations provide automobile
insurance through 21st Century Insurance, its direct
marketing distribution channel, and the Agency Auto Division,
its independent agent/broker distribution channel. It also
provides a broad range of coverages for high net worth
individuals through the AIG Private Client Group (Private Client
Group). Coverages for the Personal Lines operations are written
predominantly in the United States.
Mortgage
Guaranty
The main business of the subsidiaries of United Guaranty
Corporation (UGC) is the issuance of residential mortgage
guaranty insurance, both domestically and internationally, that
covers the first loss for credit defaults on high loan-to-value
conventional first-lien mortgages for the purchase or refinance
of one to four family residences.
On October 13, 2008, United Guaranty Residential Insurance
Company (UGRIC) and United Guaranty Mortgage Indemnity Company
(UGMIC) were downgraded from A+ to A- and placed on CreditWatch
negative by S&P, and on February 13, 2009, UGRIC was
downgraded from Aa3 to A3 and placed under review for possible
downgrade by Moodys. All U.S-based mortgage insurers are
currently subject to a Government Sponsored Enterprise (GSE)
remediation plan as a result of industry-wide rating agency
downgrades. UGRIC and UGMIC continue to write new domestic
first-lien mortgage insurance and remain eligible mortgage
insurers with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.
Foreign
General Insurance
AIGs Foreign General Insurance group writes both
commercial and consumer lines of insurance which is primarily
underwritten through American International Underwriters (AIU),
a marketing unit consisting of wholly owned agencies and
insurance companies. The Foreign General Insurance group also
includes business written by AIGs foreign-based insurance
subsidiaries. The Foreign General Insurance group uses various
marketing methods and multiple distribution channels to write
both commercial and consumer lines insurance with certain
refinements for local laws, customs and needs. AIU operates in
Asia, the Pacific Rim, Europe, the U.K., Africa, the Middle East
and Latin America. During 2008, the Foreign General Insurance
group accounted for 32 percent of AIGs General
Insurance net premiums written.
Discussion
and Analysis of Consolidated Net Losses and Loss Expense Reserve
Development
The reserve for net losses and loss expenses represents the
accumulation of estimates for reported losses (case basis
reserves) and provisions for losses incurred but not reported
(IBNR), both reduced by applicable reinsurance recoverable and
the discount for future investment income, where permitted. Net
losses and loss expenses are charged to income as incurred.
8 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
The liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense
(loss reserves) established with respect to foreign business are
set and monitored in terms of the currency in which payment is
expected to be made. Therefore, no assumption is included for
changes in currency rates. See also Note 1(dd) to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Management reviews the adequacy of established loss reserves
utilizing a number of analytical reserve development techniques.
Through the use of these techniques, management is able to
monitor the adequacy of AIGs established reserves and
determine appropriate assumptions for inflation. Also, analysis
of emerging specific development patterns, such as case reserve
redundancies or deficiencies and IBNR emergence, allows
management to determine any required adjustments.
The Analysis of Consolidated Losses and Loss Expense
Reserve Development table presents the development of net
losses and loss expense reserves for calendar years 1998 through
2008. Immediately following this table is a second table that
presents all data on a basis that excludes asbestos and
environmental net losses and loss expense reserve development.
The opening reserves held are shown at the top of the table for
each year-end date. The amount of loss reserve discount included
in the opening reserve at each date is shown immediately below
the reserves held for each year. The undiscounted reserve at
each date is thus the sum of the discount and the reserve held.
The upper half of the table presents the cumulative amounts paid
during successive years related to the undiscounted opening loss
reserves. For example, in the table that excludes asbestos and
environmental losses, with respect to the net losses and loss
expense reserve of $25.29 billion at December 31,
2001, by the end of 2008 (seven years later) $36.35 billion
had actually been paid in settlement of these net loss reserves.
In addition, as reflected in the lower section of the table, the
original undiscounted reserve of $26.71 billion was
reestimated to be $46.69 billion at December 31, 2008.
This increase from the original estimate generally results from
a combination of a number of factors, including reserves being
settled for larger amounts than originally estimated. The
original estimates will also be increased or decreased as more
information becomes known about the individual claims and
overall claim frequency and severity patterns. The redundancy
(deficiency) depicted in the table, for any particular calendar
year, presents the aggregate change in estimates over the period
of years subsequent to the calendar year reflected at the top of
the respective column heading. For example, the deficiency of
$107 million at December 31, 2008 related to
December 31, 2007 net losses and loss expense reserves
of $70.03 billion represents the cumulative amount by which
reserves in 2007 and prior years have developed unfavorably
during 2008.
The bottom of each table below presents the remaining
undiscounted and discounted net loss reserve for each year. For
example, in the table that excludes asbestos and environmental
losses, for the 2003 year-end, the remaining undiscounted
reserves held at December 31, 2008 are $15.40 billion,
with a corresponding discounted net reserve of
$14.36 billion.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 9
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Analysis
of Consolidated Losses and Loss Expense Reserve
Development
The following table presents for each calendar year the
losses and loss expense reserves and the development thereof
including those with respect to asbestos and environmental
claims. See also Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Operating Review General Insurance
Operations Liability for unpaid claims and claims
adjustment expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net Reserves Held
|
|
$
|
25,418
|
|
|
$
|
25,636
|
|
|
$
|
25,684
|
|
|
$
|
26,005
|
|
|
$
|
29,347
|
|
|
$
|
36,228
|
|
|
$
|
47,254
|
|
|
$
|
57,476
|
|
|
$
|
62,630
|
|
|
$
|
69,288
|
|
|
$
|
72,455
|
|
Discount (in Reserves Held)
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
1,553
|
|
|
|
2,110
|
|
|
|
2,264
|
|
|
|
2,429
|
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
Net Reserves Held (Undiscounted)
|
|
|
26,315
|
|
|
|
26,711
|
|
|
|
26,971
|
|
|
|
27,428
|
|
|
|
30,846
|
|
|
|
37,744
|
|
|
|
48,807
|
|
|
|
59,586
|
|
|
|
64,894
|
|
|
|
71,717
|
|
|
|
75,029
|
|
Paid (Cumulative) as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year later
|
|
|
7,205
|
|
|
|
8,266
|
|
|
|
9,709
|
|
|
|
11,007
|
|
|
|
10,775
|
|
|
|
12,163
|
|
|
|
14,910
|
|
|
|
15,326
|
|
|
|
14,862
|
|
|
|
16,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two years later
|
|
|
12,382
|
|
|
|
14,640
|
|
|
|
17,149
|
|
|
|
18,091
|
|
|
|
18,589
|
|
|
|
21,773
|
|
|
|
24,377
|
|
|
|
25,152
|
|
|
|
24,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three years later
|
|
|
16,599
|
|
|
|
19,901
|
|
|
|
21,930
|
|
|
|
23,881
|
|
|
|
25,513
|
|
|
|
28,763
|
|
|
|
31,296
|
|
|
|
32,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four years later
|
|
|
20,263
|
|
|
|
23,074
|
|
|
|
26,090
|
|
|
|
28,717
|
|
|
|
30,757
|
|
|
|
33,825
|
|
|
|
36,804
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five years later
|
|
|
22,303
|
|
|
|
25,829
|
|
|
|
29,473
|
|
|
|
32,685
|
|
|
|
34,627
|
|
|
|
38,087
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six years later
|
|
|
24,114
|
|
|
|
28,165
|
|
|
|
32,421
|
|
|
|
35,656
|
|
|
|
37,778
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seven years later
|
|
|
25,770
|
|
|
|
30,336
|
|
|
|
34,660
|
|
|
|
38,116
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eight years later
|
|
|
27,309
|
|
|
|
31,956
|
|
|
|
36,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine years later
|
|
|
28,626
|
|
|
|
33,489
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ten years later
|
|
|
29,799
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net Reserves Held (Undiscounted)
|
|
$
|
26,315
|
|
|
$
|
26,711
|
|
|
$
|
26,971
|
|
|
$
|
27,428
|
|
|
$
|
30,846
|
|
|
$
|
37,744
|
|
|
$
|
48,807
|
|
|
$
|
59,586
|
|
|
$
|
64,894
|
|
|
$
|
71,717
|
|
|
$
|
75,029
|
|
Undiscounted Liability as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year later
|
|
|
25,897
|
|
|
|
26,358
|
|
|
|
26,979
|
|
|
|
31,112
|
|
|
|
32,913
|
|
|
|
40,931
|
|
|
|
53,486
|
|
|
|
59,533
|
|
|
|
64,238
|
|
|
|
71,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two years later
|
|
|
25,638
|
|
|
|
27,023
|
|
|
|
30,696
|
|
|
|
33,363
|
|
|
|
37,583
|
|
|
|
49,463
|
|
|
|
55,009
|
|
|
|
60,126
|
|
|
|
64,764
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three years later
|
|
|
26,169
|
|
|
|
29,994
|
|
|
|
32,732
|
|
|
|
37,964
|
|
|
|
46,179
|
|
|
|
51,497
|
|
|
|
56,047
|
|
|
|
61,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four years later
|
|
|
28,021
|
|
|
|
31,192
|
|
|
|
36,210
|
|
|
|
45,203
|
|
|
|
48,427
|
|
|
|
52,964
|
|
|
|
57,618
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five years later
|
|
|
28,607
|
|
|
|
33,910
|
|
|
|
41,699
|
|
|
|
47,078
|
|
|
|
49,855
|
|
|
|
54,870
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six years later
|
|
|
30,632
|
|
|
|
38,087
|
|
|
|
43,543
|
|
|
|
48,273
|
|
|
|
51,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seven years later
|
|
|
33,861
|
|
|
|
39,597
|
|
|
|
44,475
|
|
|
|
49,803
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eight years later
|
|
|
34,986
|
|
|
|
40,217
|
|
|
|
45,767
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine years later
|
|
|
35,556
|
|
|
|
41,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ten years later
|
|
|
36,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Redundancy / (Deficiency)
|
|
|
(9,846
|
)
|
|
|
(14,457
|
)
|
|
|
(18,796
|
)
|
|
|
(22,375
|
)
|
|
|
(20,714
|
)
|
|
|
(17,126
|
)
|
|
|
(8,811
|
)
|
|
|
(1,656
|
)
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Reserves (Undiscounted)
|
|
|
6,362
|
|
|
|
7,679
|
|
|
|
9,270
|
|
|
|
11,687
|
|
|
|
13,782
|
|
|
|
16,783
|
|
|
|
20,814
|
|
|
|
28,947
|
|
|
|
40,376
|
|
|
|
55,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Discount
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
|
|
2,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Reserves
|
|
|
5,909
|
|
|
|
7,142
|
|
|
|
8,626
|
|
|
|
10,919
|
|
|
|
12,879
|
|
|
|
15,743
|
|
|
|
19,624
|
|
|
|
27,549
|
|
|
|
38,685
|
|
|
|
53,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
The following table presents the gross liability (before
discount), reinsurance recoverable and net liability recorded at
each year-end and the reestimation of these amounts as of
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Gross Liability, End of Year
|
|
$
|
36,973
|
|
|
$
|
37,278
|
|
|
$
|
39,222
|
|
|
$
|
42,629
|
|
|
$
|
48,173
|
|
|
$
|
53,387
|
|
|
$
|
63,431
|
|
|
$
|
79,279
|
|
|
$
|
82,263
|
|
|
$
|
87,929
|
|
|
$
|
91,832
|
|
Reinsurance Recoverable, End of Year
|
|
|
10,658
|
|
|
|
10,567
|
|
|
|
12,251
|
|
|
|
15,201
|
|
|
|
17,327
|
|
|
|
15,643
|
|
|
|
14,624
|
|
|
|
19,693
|
|
|
|
17,369
|
|
|
|
16,212
|
|
|
|
16,803
|
|
Net Liability, End of Year
|
|
|
26,315
|
|
|
|
26,711
|
|
|
|
26,971
|
|
|
|
27,428
|
|
|
|
30,846
|
|
|
|
37,744
|
|
|
|
48,807
|
|
|
|
59,586
|
|
|
|
64,894
|
|
|
|
71,717
|
|
|
|
75,029
|
|
Reestimated Gross Liability
|
|
|
55,592
|
|
|
|
61,885
|
|
|
|
68,507
|
|
|
|
73,240
|
|
|
|
74,920
|
|
|
|
75,807
|
|
|
|
76,619
|
|
|
|
82,943
|
|
|
|
82,923
|
|
|
|
88,264
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reestimated Reinsurance Recoverable
|
|
|
19,431
|
|
|
|
20,717
|
|
|
|
22,740
|
|
|
|
23,437
|
|
|
|
23,360
|
|
|
|
20,937
|
|
|
|
19,001
|
|
|
|
21,701
|
|
|
|
18,159
|
|
|
|
16,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reestimated Net Liability
|
|
|
36,161
|
|
|
|
41,168
|
|
|
|
45,767
|
|
|
|
49,803
|
|
|
|
51,560
|
|
|
|
54,870
|
|
|
|
57,618
|
|
|
|
61,242
|
|
|
|
64,764
|
|
|
|
71,873
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redundancy/(Deficiency)
|
|
|
(18,619
|
)
|
|
|
(24,607
|
)
|
|
|
(29,285
|
)
|
|
|
(30,611
|
)
|
|
|
(26,747
|
)
|
|
|
(22,420
|
)
|
|
|
(13,188
|
)
|
|
|
(3,664
|
)
|
|
|
(660
|
)
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Analysis
of Consolidated Losses and Loss Expense Reserve Development
Excluding Asbestos and Environmental Losses and Loss Expense
Reserve Development
The following table presents for each calendar year the
losses and loss expense reserves and the development thereof
excluding those with respect to asbestos and environmental
claims. See also Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Operating Review General Insurance
Operations Liability for unpaid claims and claims
adjustment expense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net Reserves Held
|
|
$
|
24,554
|
|
|
$
|
24,745
|
|
|
$
|
24,829
|
|
|
$
|
25,286
|
|
|
$
|
28,650
|
|
|
$
|
35,559
|
|
|
$
|
45,742
|
|
|
$
|
55,227
|
|
|
$
|
60,451
|
|
|
$
|
67,597
|
|
|
$
|
71,062
|
|
Discount (in Reserves Held)
|
|
|
897
|
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
1,287
|
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
1,553
|
|
|
|
2,110
|
|
|
|
2,264
|
|
|
|
2,429
|
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
Net Reserves Held (Undiscounted)
|
|
|
25,451
|
|
|
|
25,820
|
|
|
|
26,116
|
|
|
|
26,709
|
|
|
|
30,149
|
|
|
|
37,075
|
|
|
|
47,295
|
|
|
|
57,337
|
|
|
|
62,715
|
|
|
|
70,026
|
|
|
|
73,636
|
|
Paid (Cumulative) as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year later
|
|
|
7,084
|
|
|
|
8,195
|
|
|
|
9,515
|
|
|
|
10,861
|
|
|
|
10,632
|
|
|
|
11,999
|
|
|
|
14,718
|
|
|
|
15,047
|
|
|
|
14,356
|
|
|
|
16,183
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two years later
|
|
|
12,190
|
|
|
|
14,376
|
|
|
|
16,808
|
|
|
|
17,801
|
|
|
|
18,283
|
|
|
|
21,419
|
|
|
|
23,906
|
|
|
|
24,367
|
|
|
|
23,535
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three years later
|
|
|
16,214
|
|
|
|
19,490
|
|
|
|
21,447
|
|
|
|
23,430
|
|
|
|
25,021
|
|
|
|
28,129
|
|
|
|
30,320
|
|
|
|
31,163
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four years later
|
|
|
19,732
|
|
|
|
22,521
|
|
|
|
25,445
|
|
|
|
28,080
|
|
|
|
29,987
|
|
|
|
32,686
|
|
|
|
35,481
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five years later
|
|
|
21,630
|
|
|
|
25,116
|
|
|
|
28,643
|
|
|
|
31,771
|
|
|
|
33,353
|
|
|
|
36,601
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six years later
|
|
|
23,282
|
|
|
|
27,266
|
|
|
|
31,315
|
|
|
|
34,238
|
|
|
|
36,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seven years later
|
|
|
24,753
|
|
|
|
29,162
|
|
|
|
33,051
|
|
|
|
36,353
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eight years later
|
|
|
26,017
|
|
|
|
30,279
|
|
|
|
34,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine years later
|
|
|
26,832
|
|
|
|
31,469
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ten years later
|
|
|
27,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 11
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net Reserves Held (Undiscounted)
|
|
$
|
25,451
|
|
|
$
|
25,820
|
|
|
$
|
26,116
|
|
|
$
|
26,709
|
|
|
$
|
30,149
|
|
|
$
|
37,075
|
|
|
$
|
47,295
|
|
|
$
|
57,337
|
|
|
$
|
62,715
|
|
|
$
|
70,026
|
|
|
$
|
73,636
|
|
Undiscounted Liability as of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One year later
|
|
|
24,890
|
|
|
|
25,437
|
|
|
|
26,071
|
|
|
|
30,274
|
|
|
|
32,129
|
|
|
|
39,261
|
|
|
|
51,048
|
|
|
|
57,077
|
|
|
|
62,043
|
|
|
|
70,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
Two years later
|
|
|
24,602
|
|
|
|
26,053
|
|
|
|
29,670
|
|
|
|
32,438
|
|
|
|
35,803
|
|
|
|
46,865
|
|
|
|
52,364
|
|
|
|
57,653
|
|
|
|
62,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three years later
|
|
|
25,084
|
|
|
|
28,902
|
|
|
|
31,619
|
|
|
|
36,043
|
|
|
|
43,467
|
|
|
|
48,691
|
|
|
|
53,385
|
|
|
|
58,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Four years later
|
|
|
26,813
|
|
|
|
30,014
|
|
|
|
34,102
|
|
|
|
42,348
|
|
|
|
45,510
|
|
|
|
50,140
|
|
|
|
54,908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Five years later
|
|
|
27,314
|
|
|
|
31,738
|
|
|
|
38,655
|
|
|
|
44,018
|
|
|
|
46,925
|
|
|
|
51,997
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six years later
|
|
|
28,345
|
|
|
|
34,978
|
|
|
|
40,294
|
|
|
|
45,201
|
|
|
|
48,584
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Seven years later
|
|
|
30,636
|
|
|
|
36,283
|
|
|
|
41,213
|
|
|
|
46,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Eight years later
|
|
|
31,556
|
|
|
|
36,889
|
|
|
|
42,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine years later
|
|
|
32,113
|
|
|
|
37,795
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ten years later
|
|
|
32,672
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Redundancy/(Deficiency)
|
|
|
(7,221
|
)
|
|
|
(11,975
|
)
|
|
|
(16,343
|
)
|
|
|
(19,976
|
)
|
|
|
(18,435
|
)
|
|
|
(14,922
|
)
|
|
|
(7,613
|
)
|
|
|
(1,384
|
)
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Reserves (Undiscounted)
|
|
|
5,011
|
|
|
|
6,326
|
|
|
|
7,916
|
|
|
|
10,332
|
|
|
|
12,425
|
|
|
|
15,396
|
|
|
|
19,427
|
|
|
|
27,558
|
|
|
|
38,986
|
|
|
|
53,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Discount
|
|
|
453
|
|
|
|
537
|
|
|
|
644
|
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
903
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
|
|
2,113
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Reserves
|
|
|
4,558
|
|
|
|
5,789
|
|
|
|
7,272
|
|
|
|
9,564
|
|
|
|
11,522
|
|
|
|
14,356
|
|
|
|
18,237
|
|
|
|
26,160
|
|
|
|
37,295
|
|
|
|
51,837
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the gross liability (before
discount), reinsurance recoverable and net liability recorded at
each year-end and the reestimation of these amounts as of
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1998
|
|
|
1999
|
|
|
2000
|
|
|
2001
|
|
|
2002
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Gross Liability, End of Year
|
|
$
|
34,474
|
|
|
$
|
34,666
|
|
|
$
|
36,777
|
|
|
$
|
40,400
|
|
|
$
|
46,036
|
|
|
$
|
51,363
|
|
|
$
|
59,790
|
|
|
$
|
73,808
|
|
|
$
|
77,111
|
|
|
$
|
83,551
|
|
|
$
|
87,973
|
|
Reinsurance Recoverable, End of Year
|
|
|
9,023
|
|
|
|
8,846
|
|
|
|
10,661
|
|
|
|
13,691
|
|
|
|
15,887
|
|
|
|
14,288
|
|
|
|
12,495
|
|
|
|
16,472
|
|
|
|
14,396
|
|
|
|
13,525
|
|
|
|
14,337
|
|
Net Liability, End of Year
|
|
|
25,451
|
|
|
|
25,820
|
|
|
|
26,116
|
|
|
|
26,709
|
|
|
|
30,149
|
|
|
|
37,075
|
|
|
|
47,295
|
|
|
|
57,336
|
|
|
|
62,715
|
|
|
|
70,026
|
|
|
|
73,636
|
|
Reestimated Gross Liability
|
|
|
46,549
|
|
|
|
53,249
|
|
|
|
60,393
|
|
|
|
65,655
|
|
|
|
67,678
|
|
|
|
68,955
|
|
|
|
70,056
|
|
|
|
76,802
|
|
|
|
77,439
|
|
|
|
83,658
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reestimated Reinsurance Recoverable
|
|
|
13,877
|
|
|
|
15,454
|
|
|
|
17,934
|
|
|
|
18,970
|
|
|
|
19,094
|
|
|
|
16,958
|
|
|
|
15,148
|
|
|
|
18,081
|
|
|
|
14,918
|
|
|
|
13,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reestimated Net Liability
|
|
|
32,672
|
|
|
|
37,795
|
|
|
|
42,459
|
|
|
|
46,685
|
|
|
|
48,584
|
|
|
|
51,997
|
|
|
|
54,908
|
|
|
|
58,721
|
|
|
|
62,521
|
|
|
|
70,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redundancy/(Deficiency)
|
|
|
(12,075
|
)
|
|
|
(18,583
|
)
|
|
|
(23,616
|
)
|
|
|
(25,255
|
)
|
|
|
(21,642
|
)
|
|
|
(17,592
|
)
|
|
|
(10,266
|
)
|
|
|
(2,994
|
)
|
|
|
(328
|
)
|
|
|
(107
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense as
reported in AIGs consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2008 differs from the total reserve reported
in the Annual Statements filed with state insurance departments
and, where appropriate, with foreign regulatory authorities. The
differences at December 31, 2008 relate primarily to
reserves for certain foreign operations not required to be
reported in the United States for statutory reporting purposes.
Further, statutory practices in the United States require
reserves to be shown net of applicable reinsurance recoverable.
The reserve for gross losses and loss expenses is prior to
reinsurance and represents the accumulation for reported losses
and IBNR. Management reviews the adequacy of established gross
loss reserves in the manner previously described for net loss
reserves.
For further discussion regarding net reserves for losses and
loss expenses, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Results of Operations Segment Results
General Insurance Operations Liability for unpaid
claims and claims adjustment expense.
Life
Insurance & Retirement Services Operations
AIGs Life Insurance & Retirement Services
operations provide insurance, financial and investment-oriented
products throughout the world. Insurance-oriented products
consist of individual and group life, payout annuities
(including structured settlements), endowment and accident and
health policies. Retirement savings products consist generally
of fixed and variable annuities.
12 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Foreign
Life Insurance & Retirement Services
In its Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services
businesses, AIG operates principally through ALICO, AIG Star
Life, AIG Edison Life, AIA, Nan Shan and Philamlife. ALICO is
incorporated in Delaware and all of its business is written
outside the United States. ALICO has operations either directly
or through subsidiaries in Europe, including the U.K., Latin
America, the Caribbean, the Middle East, South Asia and the Far
East, with Japan being the largest territory. AIA operates
primarily in China (including Hong Kong), Singapore, Malaysia,
Thailand, Korea, Australia, New Zealand, Vietnam, Indonesia and
India. The operations in India are conducted through a joint
venture, Tata AIG Life Insurance Company Limited. Nan Shan
operates in Taiwan. Philamlife is the largest life insurer in
the Philippines. AIG Star Life and AIG Edison Life operate in
Japan. Operations in foreign countries comprised 80 percent
of Life Insurance & Retirement Services premiums and
other considerations in 2008.
The Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services
companies have over 350,000 full and part-time agents, as well
as independent producers, and sell their products largely to
indigenous persons in local and foreign currencies. In addition
to the agency outlets, these companies also distribute their
products through direct marketing channels, such as mass
marketing, and through brokers and other distribution outlets,
such as financial institutions in 2008.
Domestic
Life Insurance and Domestic Retirement
Services
AIGs principal Domestic Life Insurance and
Domestic Retirement Services operations include AGLA, AIG
American General, AIG Annuity, USLIFE, VALIC and AIG SunAmerica.
These companies utilize multiple distribution channels including
independent producers, brokerage, career agents and financial
institutions to offer life insurance, annuity and accident and
health products and services, as well as financial and other
investment products. The Domestic Life Insurance and
Domestic Retirement Services operations comprised
20 percent of total Life Insurance & Retirement
Services premiums and other considerations.
Reinsurance
AIGs General Insurance subsidiaries worldwide operate
primarily by underwriting and accepting risks for their direct
account and securing reinsurance on that portion of the risk in
excess of the limit which they wish to retain. This operating
policy differs from that of many insurance companies that will
underwrite only up to their net retention limit, thereby
requiring the broker or agent to secure commitments from other
underwriters for the remainder of the gross risk amount.
Various AIG profit centers, including Commercial Insurance, AIU
and AIG Risk Finance, as well as certain Life Insurance
subsidiaries, use AIRCO as a reinsurer for certain of their
businesses. In Bermuda, AIRCO discounts reserves attributable to
certain classes of business assumed from other AIG subsidiaries.
For a further discussion of reinsurance, see Item 1A. Risk
Factors Reinsurance; Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Risk Management Insurance
Risk Management Reinsurance; and Note 1 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 13
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Insurance
Investment Operations
A significant portion of AIGs General Insurance and Life
Insurance & Retirement Services revenues are derived
from AIGs insurance investment operations. The following
table summarizes the investment results of the insurance
operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Average Cash and Invested Assets
|
|
|
Return on
|
|
|
Return on
|
|
|
|
Cash (including
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Cash
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
short-term
|
|
|
Invested
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Invested
|
|
|
Invested
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
investments)(a)
|
|
|
Assets(a)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Assets(b)
|
|
|
Assets(c)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
General Insurance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
9,766
|
|
|
$
|
111,435
|
|
|
$
|
121,201
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
2007
|
|
|
5,874
|
|
|
|
117,050
|
|
|
|
122,924
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
2006
|
|
|
3,201
|
|
|
|
102,231
|
|
|
|
105,432
|
|
|
|
5.4
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2,450
|
|
|
|
86,211
|
|
|
|
88,661
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2,012
|
|
|
|
73,338
|
|
|
|
75,350
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Life Insurance & Retirement Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
$
|
29,278
|
|
|
$
|
385,980
|
|
|
$
|
415,258
|
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
2007
|
|
|
25,926
|
|
|
|
423,743
|
|
|
|
449,669
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
|
|
|
5.3
|
|
2006
|
|
|
13,698
|
|
|
|
392,348
|
|
|
|
406,046
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
2005
|
|
|
11,137
|
|
|
|
356,839
|
|
|
|
367,976
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
2004
|
|
|
7,737
|
|
|
|
309,627
|
|
|
|
317,364
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Including investment income due and accrued and real estate.
Also, includes collateral assets invested under the securities
lending program. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Net investment income divided by the annual average sum of
cash and invested assets. |
|
(c) |
|
Net investment income divided by the annual average invested
assets. |
AIGs worldwide insurance investment policy places primary
emphasis on investments in government and fixed income
securities in all of its portfolios and, to a lesser extent,
investments in high-yield bonds, common stocks, real estate,
hedge funds and other alternative investments, in order to
enhance returns on policyholders funds and generate net
investment income. The ability to implement this policy is
somewhat limited in certain territories as there may be a lack
of attractive long-term investment opportunities or investment
restrictions may be imposed by the local regulatory authorities.
Financial
Services Operations
AIGs Financial Services subsidiaries engage in diversified
activities including aircraft leasing, capital markets, consumer
finance and insurance premium finance. Together, the Aircraft
Leasing, Capital Markets and Consumer Finance operations
generate the majority of the revenues produced by the Financial
Services operations. A.I. Credit also contributes to Financial
Services results principally by providing insurance premium
financing for both AIGs policyholders and those of other
insurers.
Aircraft
Leasing
AIGs Aircraft Leasing operations are the operations of
ILFC, which generates its revenues primarily from leasing new
and used commercial jet aircraft to foreign and domestic
airlines. Revenues also result from the remarketing of
commercial jet aircraft for ILFCs own account, and
remarketing and fleet management services for airlines and
financial institutions. See also Note 3 to Consolidated
Financial Statements.
Capital
Markets
Capital Markets is comprised of the operations of AIGFP, which
engaged as principal in a wide variety of financial
transactions, including standard and customized financial
products involving commodities, credit,
14 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
currencies, energy, equities and interest rates. AIGFP also
invests in a diversified portfolio of securities and principal
investments and engages in borrowing activities that involve
issuing standard and structured notes and other securities and
entering into guaranteed investment agreements (GIAs). Due to
the extreme market conditions experienced in 2008, the
downgrades of AIGs credit ratings by the rating agencies,
as well as AIGs intent to refocus on its core businesses,
AIGFP has begun to unwind its businesses and portfolios
including those associated with credit protection written
through credit default swaps on super senior risk tranches of
diversified pools of loans and debt securities. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Outlook
Financial Services.
Consumer
Finance
AIGs Consumer Finance operations in North America are
principally conducted through AGF. AGF derives most of its
revenues from finance charges assessed on real estate loans,
secured and unsecured non-real estate loans and retail sales
finance receivables. In the second quarter of 2008, AGF ceased
its wholesale originations (originations through mortgage
brokers). In light of severe stress in the U.S. housing sector,
AGF also closed 179 branch offices and reduced new loan
originations in the fourth quarter of 2008.
AIGs foreign consumer finance operations are principally
conducted through AIGCFG. AIGCFG operates primarily in emerging
and developing markets. AIGCFG has operations in Argentina,
China, Brazil, Hong Kong, Mexico, the Philippines, Poland,
Taiwan, Thailand, India and Colombia. Through February 18,
2009, AIGCFG had entered into contracts to sell certain of its
operations in Taiwan, Thailand and the Philippines.
Asset
Management Operations
AIGs Asset Management operations comprise a wide variety
of investment-related services and investment products. These
services and products are offered to individuals, pension funds
and institutions (including AIG subsidiaries) globally through
AIGs Spread-Based Investment business, Institutional Asset
Management, and Brokerage Services and Mutual Funds business.
Also included in Asset Management operations are the results of
certain SunAmerica sponsored partnership investments.
Revenues and operating income (loss) for Asset Management are
affected by the general conditions in the equity and credit
markets. In addition, net realized gains (losses) and
performance fee (carried interest) revenues are contingent upon
various fund closings, maturity levels, investment management
performance and market conditions.
Spread-Based
Investment Business
AIGs Spread-Based Investment business includes the results
of AIGs proprietary spread-based investment operations,
the Matched Investment Program (MIP) and the Guaranteed
Investment Contracts (GIC), which the MIP replaced. Due to the
extreme market conditions experienced in 2008 and the downgrades
of AIGs credit ratings, the MIP is currently in run-off.
As previously disclosed, the GIC has been in run-off since the
inception of the MIP in 2006. No additional debt issuances are
expected for either the MIP or GIC for the foreseeable future.
Institutional
Asset Management
AIGs Institutional Asset Management business, conducted
through AIG Investments, provides an array of investment
products and services globally to institutional investors,
pension funds, AIG subsidiaries, AIG affiliates and high net
worth investors. These products include traditional equity and
fixed maturity securities, and a wide range of real estate,
private banking and alternative asset classes. Services include
investment advisory and sub-advisory services, investment
monitoring and transaction structuring. Within the equity and
fixed maturity asset classes, AIG Investments offers various
forms of structured investments. Within the alternative asset
class, AIG Investments offers hedge and private equity funds and
fund-of-funds, direct investments and distressed debt
investments. AIG Global Real Estate provides a wide range of
real estate investment, development and management services for
AIG subsidiaries, as well as for third-party institutional
investors, pension funds and high net worth investors. AIG
Global Real Estate also maintains a proprietary real estate
investment portfolio through various joint venture platforms.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 15
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
AIG expects to divest its Institutional Asset Management
businesses consisting of investment services that are offered to
third-party clients. The businesses offered for sale exclude
those investment services providing traditional fixed income and
shorter duration asset and liability management for AIGs
insurance company subsidiaries. AIG expects to continue
relationships with the divested businesses for other investment
management services used by those subsidiaries.
AIG Investments previously acquired alternative investments,
primarily consisting of direct private equity and private equity
fund investments, with the intention of warehousing
such investments until the investment or economic benefit
thereof could be transferred to a fund or other AIG-managed
investment product. However, AIG Investments intended
launch of such new products and funds has been indefinitely
postponed. As a result of this decision, AIG will retain these
investments with a net asset value of $1.1 billion at
December 31, 2008 as proprietary investments until they can
be divested. Unaffiliated investment commitments associated with
these investments were approximately $720 million at
December 31, 2008 and are expected to be funded over the
next five years. AIG accounts for these investments based on the
attributes of the investment using consolidation, equity or cost
accounting methods, as appropriate.
Other
Operations
AIGs Other operations include interest expense,
restructuring costs, expenses of corporate staff not
attributable to specific business segments, expenses related to
efforts to improve internal controls, corporate initiatives,
certain compensation plan expenses and the settlement costs more
fully described in Note 14(a) to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Certain AIG subsidiaries provide insurance-related services such
as adjusting claims and marketing specialized products. Several
wholly owned foreign subsidiaries of AIG operating in countries
or jurisdictions such as Ireland, Bermuda, Barbados and
Gibraltar provide insurance and related administrative and back
office services to affiliated and unaffiliated insurance and
reinsurance companies, including captive insurance companies
unaffiliated with AIG.
For additional information regarding the business of AIG on a
consolidated basis, the contributions made to AIGs
consolidated revenues and operating income and the assets held
by its General Insurance, Life Insurance & Retirement
Services, Financial Services and Asset Management operations and
Other operations, see Selected Financial Data, Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations and Notes 1 and 3 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Locations
of Certain Assets
As of December 31, 2008, approximately 39 percent of
the consolidated assets of AIG were located in foreign countries
(other than Canada), including $7.7 billion of cash and
securities on deposit with foreign regulatory authorities.
Foreign operations and assets held abroad may be adversely
affected by political developments in foreign countries,
including tax changes, nationalization and changes in regulatory
policy, as well as by consequence of hostilities and unrest. The
risks of such occurrences and their overall effect upon AIG vary
from country to country and cannot easily be predicted. If
expropriation or nationalization does occur, AIGs policy
is to take all appropriate measures to seek recovery of such
assets. Certain of the countries in which AIGs business is
conducted have currency restrictions which generally cause a
delay in a companys ability to repatriate assets and
profits. See also Item 1A. Risk Factors Foreign
Operations and Notes 1 and 3 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Regulation
AIGs operations around the world are subject to regulation
by many different types of regulatory authorities, including
insurance, securities, investment advisory, banking and thrift
regulators in the United States and abroad. AIGs
operations have become more diverse and consumer-oriented,
increasing the scope of regulatory supervision and the
possibility of intervention. In light of AIGs liquidity
problems in the third and fourth quarters of 2008, AIG and its
regulated subsidiaries have been subject to intense review and
supervision around the world. Regulators have taken significant
steps to protect the businesses of the entities they regulate.
These steps have included:
|
|
|
|
|
restricting or prohibiting the payment of dividends to AIG;
|
16 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
restricting or prohibiting other payments to AIG;
|
|
|
|
requesting additional capital contributions by AIG;
|
|
|
|
requesting that intercompany reinsurance reserves be covered by
assets locally;
|
|
|
|
restricting the business in which the subsidiaries may engage;
|
|
|
|
requiring pre-approval of all proposed transactions between the
regulated subsidiaries and AIG or any with affiliates; and
|
|
|
|
requiring more frequent reporting, including with respect to
capital and liquidity positions.
|
These and other actions have made it challenging for AIG to
continue to engage in business in the ordinary course. AIG does
not expect these conditions to change until its financial
situation stabilizes.
In 1999, AIG became a unitary thrift holding company within the
meaning of the Home Owners Loan Act (HOLA) when the Office
of Thrift Supervision (OTS) granted AIG approval to organize AIG
Federal Savings Bank. AIG is subject to OTS regulation,
examination, supervision and reporting requirements. In
addition, the OTS has enforcement authority over AIG and its
subsidiaries. Among other things, this permits the OTS to
restrict or prohibit activities that are determined to be a
serious risk to the financial safety, soundness or stability of
AIGs subsidiary savings association, AIG Federal Savings
Bank.
Under prior law, a unitary savings and loan holding company,
such as AIG, was not restricted as to the types of business in
which it could engage, provided that its savings association
subsidiary continued to be a qualified thrift lender. The
Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (GLBA) provides that no company
may acquire control of an OTS regulated institution after
May 4, 1999 unless it engages only in the financial
activities permitted for financial holding companies under the
law or for multiple savings and loan holding companies. The
GLBA, however, grandfathered the unrestricted authority for
activities with respect to a unitary savings and loan holding
company existing prior to May 4, 1999, so long as its
savings association subsidiary continues to be a qualified
thrift lender under the HOLA. As a unitary savings and loan
holding company whose application was pending as of May 4,
1999, AIG is grandfathered under the GLBA and generally is not
restricted under existing laws as to the types of business
activities in which it may engage, provided that AIG Federal
Savings Bank continues to be a qualified thrift lender under the
HOLA.
Certain states require registration and periodic reporting by
insurance companies that are licensed in such states and are
controlled by other corporations. Applicable legislation
typically requires periodic disclosure concerning the
corporation that controls the registered insurer and the other
companies in the holding company system and prior approval of
intercorporate services and transfers of assets (including in
some instances payment of dividends by the insurance subsidiary)
within the holding company system. AIGs subsidiaries are
registered under such legislation in those states that have such
requirements.
AIGs insurance subsidiaries, in common with other
insurers, are subject to regulation and supervision by the
states and by other jurisdictions in which they do business.
Within the United States, the method of such regulation varies
but generally has its source in statutes that delegate
regulatory and supervisory powers to an insurance official. The
regulation and supervision relate primarily to approval of
policy forms and rates, the standards of solvency that must be
met and maintained, including risk-based capital, the licensing
of insurers and their agents, the nature of and limitations on
investments, restrictions on the size of risks that may be
insured under a single policy, deposits of securities for the
benefit of policyholders, requirements for acceptability of
reinsurers, periodic examinations of the affairs of insurance
companies, the form and content of reports of financial
condition required to be filed, and reserves for unearned
premiums, losses and other purposes. In general, such regulation
is for the protection of policyholders rather than the equity
owners of these companies.
AIG has taken various steps to enhance the capital positions of
the AIG Property Casualty Group companies. AIG entered into
capital maintenance agreements with these companies that set
forth procedures through which AIG will provide ongoing capital
support. Also, in order to allow the AIG Property Casualty Group
companies to record as an admitted asset at December 31,
2008 certain reinsurance ceded to non-U.S. reinsurers
(which has the effect of maintaining the level of the statutory
surplus of such companies), AIG obtained and entered into
reimbursement agreements for approximately $1.6 billion of
letters of credit issued
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 17
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
by several commercial banks in favor of certain AIG Property
Casualty Group companies and funded trusts totalling
$2.9 billion. Finally, AIG has agreed to contribute capital
to the AIG Property Casualty Group companies that hold shares of
Transatlantic if, upon selling their Transatlantic shares they
receive less than the shares statutory book value. The
amount of the capital contribution would equal the difference
between the aggregate statutory book value of the shares they
sold and the aggregate cash proceeds they received in respect to
those shares.
In the U.S., the Risk-Based Capital (RBC) formula is designed to
measure the adequacy of an insurers statutory surplus in
relation to the risks inherent in its business. Thus,
inadequately capitalized general and life insurance companies
may be identified. The U.S. RBC formula develops a
risk-adjusted target level of statutory surplus by applying
certain factors to various asset, premium and reserve items.
Higher factors are applied to more risky items and lower factors
are applied to less risky items. Thus, the target level of
statutory surplus varies not only as a result of the
insurers size, but also based on the risk profile of the
insurers operations.
The RBC Model Law provides for four incremental levels of
regulatory attention for insurers whose surplus is below the
calculated RBC target. These levels of attention range in
severity from requiring the insurer to submit a plan for
corrective action to placing the insurer under regulatory
control.
The statutory surplus of each of AIGs AIG Property
Casualty Group and U.S.-based Life Insurance subsidiaries
exceeded their RBC minimum required levels as of
December 31, 2008.
To the extent that any of AIGs insurance entities would
fall below prescribed levels of statutory surplus, it would be
AIGs intention to provide appropriate capital or other
types of support to that entity.
A substantial portion of AIGs General Insurance business
and a majority of its Life Insurance business is conducted in
foreign countries. The degree of regulation and supervision in
foreign jurisdictions varies. Generally, AIG, as well as the
underwriting companies operating in such jurisdictions, must
satisfy local regulatory requirements. Licenses issued by
foreign authorities to AIG subsidiaries are subject to
modification or revocation by such authorities, and these
subsidiaries could be prevented from conducting business in
certain of the jurisdictions where they currently operate. A
change in control of AIG, such as that resulting from the
issuance of the Series C Preferred Stock (described in
Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements), or
changes in the ownership of a regulated subsidiary that may
result from a disposition of the subsidiary or the repayment of
outstanding amounts under the Fed Facility with subsidiary
preferred equity, may also trigger change of control
requirements in jurisdictions around the world and result in
other regulatory actions.
In addition to licensing requirements, AIGs foreign
operations are also regulated in various jurisdictions with
respect to currency, policy language and terms, advertising,
amount and type of security deposits, amount and type of
reserves, amount and type of capital to be held, amount and type
of local investment and the share of profits to be returned to
policyholders on participating policies. Some foreign countries
regulate rates on various types of policies. Certain countries
have established reinsurance institutions, wholly or partially
owned by the local government, to which admitted insurers are
obligated to cede a portion of their business on terms that may
not always allow foreign insurers, including AIG subsidiaries,
full compensation. In some countries, regulations governing
constitution of technical reserves and remittance balances may
hinder remittance of profits and repatriation of assets.
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Capital
Resources and Liquidity Regulation and Supervision
and Note 16 to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Competition
AIGs businesses operate in highly competitive
environments, both domestically and overseas. Principal sources
of competition are insurance companies, banks, investment banks
and other non-bank financial institutions.
The insurance industry in particular is highly competitive.
Within the United States, AIGs General Insurance
subsidiaries compete with approximately 3,400 other stock
companies, specialty insurance organizations, mutual companies
and other underwriting organizations. AIGs Life
Insurance & Retirement Services subsidiaries compete
in the United States with approximately 2,100 life insurance
companies and other participants in related financial services
fields. Overseas, AIGs subsidiaries compete for business
with the foreign insurance operations of large
U.S. insurers and with global insurance groups and local
companies in particular areas in which they are active.
18 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
As a result of the reduction of the credit ratings of AIG and
its subsidiaries, uncertainty relating to AIGs financial
condition and AIGs asset disposition plan, AIGs
businesses have faced and continue to face intense competition
to retain existing customers and to maintain business with
existing customers and counterparties at historical levels.
Further, AIG has been and continues to be at a significant
disadvantage in soliciting new customers. AIG expects these
difficult conditions to continue for the foreseeable future.
Competition is also intense for key employees. The announced
asset dispositions, decline in AIGs common stock price and
uncertainty surrounding AIGs financial condition have
adversely affected AIGs ability to retain key employees
and to attract new employees. While AIG has granted retention
awards and taken other steps to retain its key employees, no
assurance can be given that these actions will be successful.
For a further discussion of the risks of AIGs disadvantage
in soliciting new customers and losing key employees, see
item 1A. Risk Factors Employees.
Directors
and Executive Officers of AIG
All directors of AIG are elected for one-year terms at the
annual meeting of shareholders. All executive officers are
elected to one-year terms, but serve at the pleasure of the
Board of Directors.
Except as hereinafter noted, each of the executive officers has,
for more than five years, occupied an executive position with
AIG or companies that are now its subsidiaries. There are no
arrangements or understandings between any executive officer and
any other person pursuant to which the executive officer was
elected to such position. Prior to joining AIG in September
2008, Mr. Liddy served at the private equity investment
firm of Clayton, Dubilier & Rice, Inc. during 2008.
From January 1999 until his retirement in April 2008,
Mr. Liddy served as Chairman of the Board of The Allstate
Corporation (Allstate), the parent of Allstate Insurance
Company. He also served as Chief Executive Officer of Allstate
from January 1999 to December 2006 and President from January
1995 to May 2005. Ms. Reynolds was President and Chief
Executive Officer of Safeco Corporation from January 2006 to
September 2008 and Chairman from May 2008 to September 2008.
Previously, Ms. Reynolds served as President and Chief
Executive Officer of AGL Resources, an Atlanta-based energy
holding company, from 2000 to 2005 and Chairman from 2002 to
2005. From January 2000 until joining AIG in May 2004,
Dr. Frenkel served as Chairman of Merrill Lynch
International, Inc. Prior to joining AIG in September 2006,
Ms. Kelly served as Executive Vice President and General
Counsel of MCI/WorldCom. Previously, she was Senior Vice
President and General Counsel of Sears, Roebuck and Co. from
1999 to 2003. From June 2004 until joining AIG in May 2007,
Mr. Kaslow was a managing partner of QuanStar Group, LLC
(an advisory services firm), and, from January 2002 until May
2004, Mr. Kaslow was Senior Executive Vice President of
Human Resources for Vivendi Universal (an entertainment and
telecommunications company).
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 19
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Set forth below is information concerning the directors and
executive officers of AIG as of February 18, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Served as
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director or
|
Name
|
|
Title
|
|
Age
|
|
Officer Since
|
|
Stephen F. Bollenbach
|
|
Director
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
2008
|
Dennis D. Dammerman
|
|
Director
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
2008
|
Martin S. Feldstein
|
|
Director
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
1987
|
Edward M. Liddy
|
|
Director and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
2008
|
George L. Miles, Jr.
|
|
Director
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
2005
|
Suzanne Nora Johnson
|
|
Director
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
2008
|
Morris W. Offit
|
|
Director
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
2005
|
James F. Orr III
|
|
Director
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
2006
|
Virginia M. Rometty
|
|
Director
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
2006
|
Michael H. Sutton
|
|
Director
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
2005
|
Edmund S. W. Tse
|
|
Director, Senior Vice Chairman Life Insurance
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
1996
|
Richard H. Booth
|
|
Vice Chairman Transition Planning and Chief
Administrative Officer
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
2008
|
Jacob A. Frenkel
|
|
Vice Chairman Global Economic Strategies
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
2004
|
Anastasia D. Kelly
|
|
Vice Chairman Legal, Human Resources, Corporate
Communications and Corporate Affairs
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
2006
|
Paula R. Reynolds
|
|
Vice Chairman Chief Restructuring Officer
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
2008
|
Frank G. Wisner
|
|
Vice Chairman External Affairs
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
1997
|
David L. Herzog
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
2005
|
Rodney O. Martin, Jr.
|
|
Executive Vice President Life Insurance
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
2002
|
Kristian P. Moor
|
|
Executive Vice President AIG Property Casualty Group
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
1998
|
Win J. Neuger
|
|
Executive Vice President
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
1995
|
Nicholas C. Walsh
|
|
Executive Vice President Foreign General Insurance
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
2005
|
Jay S. Wintrob
|
|
Executive Vice President Retirement Services
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
1999
|
William N. Dooley
|
|
Senior Vice President Financial Services
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
1992
|
Andrew J. Kaslow
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
2007
|
Robert E. Lewis
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Risk Officer
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
1993
|
Monika M. Machon
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Investment Officer
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
2009
|
Brian T. Schreiber
|
|
Senior Vice President Global Capital Planning and
Analysis
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
2002
|
20 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
AIG has been significantly and adversely affected by recent
events in the marketplace as well as in its businesses, and is
subject to significant risks, as discussed below. Many of these
risks are interrelated and occur under similar business and
economic conditions, and the occurrence of certain of them may
in turn cause the emergence, or exacerbate the effect, of
others. Such a combination could materially increase the
severity of the impact on AIG. As a result, should certain of
these risks emerge, AIG may need additional support from the
U.S. government. Without additional support from the
U.S. government, in the future there could exist
substantial doubt about AIGs ability to continue as a
going concern. See Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Consideration of AIGs Ability to Continue as a Going
Concern and Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
for a further discussion.
Proposed
Transactions with the NY Fed and the United States
Department of the Treasury
No assurance can be given that the NY Fed and the
United States Department of the Treasury will complete the
proposed transactions with AIG. AIG has entered
into certain agreements in principle and announced intentions to
enter into transactions with the NY Fed and the
United States Department of the Treasury described below
and in Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
These proposed transactions are designed to promote AIGs
restructuring. Neither agreements in principle nor the
intentions are legally binding, and neither the NY Fed nor the
United States Department of the Treasury is bound to
proceed with the transactions or complete them on the terms
currently contemplated. AIG, however, expects to be able to
complete these transactions and others necessary to enable an
orderly restructuring and understands that the NY Fed and
the United States Department of the Treasury remain committed to
providing AIG with continued support. If AIG is unable to
complete one or more of the proposed transactions, AIGs
credit ratings may be downgraded and AIG may not be able to
complete its restructuring plan. See Credit and Financial
Strength Ratings for a discussion of the impact of a downgrade
in AIGs credit ratings.
The proposed repayment of outstanding amounts under the Fed
Facility with subsidiary preferred equity in holding companies
for AIA and ALICO is complex and may need to be
restructured. The NY Feds proposed
investment in two new holding companies for AIA and ALICO is
unprecedented and it is possible that the terms of the exchange
may change, perhaps materially.
Business
and Credit Environment
AIGs businesses, results of operations and financial
condition have been materially and adversely affected by market
conditions and will be materially affected by these conditions
for the foreseeable future. During 2008,
worldwide economic conditions significantly deteriorated and the
United States economy and most other major economies entered
into a recession. It is difficult to predict how long global
recessionary conditions will exist or the manner in which
AIGs markets, products, financial condition and businesses
will be negatively affected in the future.
The global financial crisis has resulted in a lack of liquidity,
highly volatile markets, a steep depreciation in asset values
across all classes, an erosion of investor confidence, a
widening of credit spreads, a lack of price transparency in many
markets and the collapse or merger of several prominent
financial institutions. Difficult economic conditions also
resulted in increased unemployment and a severe decline in
business activity across a wide range of industries and regions.
Global regulators, governments and central banks have taken a
number of unprecedented steps to address these issues but these
steps have so far failed to prevent financial markets from
declining by a very substantial amount, both in percentage terms
and in absolute terms. It is unclear whether these measures will
be effective or, if effective, when markets will stabilize.
AIG has been materially and adversely affected by these
conditions and events in a number of ways, including:
|
|
|
|
|
the need to enter into transactions with the NY Fed and the
United States Department of the Treasury, and to
participate in generally available governmental programs
addressing disruptions in financial markets;
|
|
|
|
severe and continued declines in the valuation and performance
of its investment portfolio across all asset classes, leading to
decreased investment income, material unrealized and realized
losses, including other-
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 21
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
than-temporary impairments, both of which decreased AIGs
shareholders equity and, to a lesser extent, the
regulatory capital of its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
|
|
significant credit losses due to the failure of, or governmental
intervention with respect to, several prominent institutions;
|
|
|
|
impairment of goodwill in its insurance and financial services
businesses; and
|
|
|
|
a general decline in business activity leading to reduced
premium volume, increases in surrenders or cancellations of
policies and increased competition from other insurers.
|
The consequences of these conditions have been more severe for
AIG than for other insurers. Since the third quarter of 2008,
AIGs principal sources of liquidity have been the Fed
Facility and issuances of commercial paper under the Commercial
Paper Funding Facility established by the NY Fed (CPFF).
Authorization for the CPFF to accept new issuances of commercial
paper is set to expire on October 30, 2009, with all
outstanding issuances under the program maturing by January
2010. Since mid-September 2008, AIG has had no access to funding
in public markets.
Certain of AIGs in-force and new business products in its
life insurance businesses provide minimum benefit guarantees and
crediting rates. Low interest rates driven by recessionary or
deflationary environments could result in a negative spread
between the yield produced by AIGs investment portfolios
and the underlying costs of these products. While potentially
providing short-term benefits, long-term profitability of the
business could be negatively affected by this negative spread
and the volume and value of new business could be adversely
affected by low interest rate environments.
Credit
and Financial Strength Ratings
Adverse ratings actions regarding AIGs long-term debt
ratings by the major rating agencies would require AIG to post a
substantial amount of additional collateral payments pursuant
to, and/or
permit the termination of, derivative transactions to which
AIGFP is a party, which could further adversely affect
AIGs business and its consolidated results of operations,
financial condition and liquidity. Additional obligations to
post collateral or the costs of assignment, termination or
obtaining alternative credit could exceed the amounts then
available under the Fed Facility. In the third
quarter of 2008, S&P, Moodys, Fitch and
A.M. Best Company (A.M. Best) each downgraded the
credit ratings of AIG Inc. and most of the Insurer Financial
Strength Ratings of AIGs insurance operating subsidiaries.
In particular, S&P downgraded AIGs long-term debt
rating by three notches, Moodys downgraded AIGs
long-term debt rating by two notches, Fitch downgraded
AIGs long-term debt rating by two notches and A.M. Best
downgraded AIGs issuer credit rating from a+ to bbb and
most of AIGs Insurer Financial Strength Ratings from A+ to
A.
Subsequent to the rating actions referred to above, the
following rating actions were taken:
|
|
|
|
|
Moodys lowered AIGs Senior Unsecured Debt rating to
A3 from A2 and ILFCs and American General Finance
Corporations (AGF Corp.) Senior Unsecured Debt ratings to
Baa1 from A3. Most ratings remain under review for possible
downgrade with ILFC revised to under review with direction
uncertain.
|
|
|
|
S&P revised the CreditWatch status on AIGs and AGF
Corp.s ratings from CreditWatch Developing to CreditWatch
Negative in October 2008. Subsequently, S&P lowered its
long-term debt rating on ILFC from A to BBB+, and its
short-term debt rating from A−1 to A−2. The ratings
remain on Credit Watch Developing. S&P lowered its
long-term debt rating on AGF Corp. from BBB to BB+, and its
short-term debt rating from A−3 to B. The long-term debt
ratings were assigned a Negative Outlook. S&P also revised
the credit watch status of AIGs property and casualty
subsidiaries from Credit Watch Developing to Credit Watch
Negative.
|
|
|
|
Fitch lowered its long-term debt ratings on AGF Corp. from A to
BBB. The ratings remain on Rating Watch Evolving. Fitch also
removed the ratings of AIG, Inc. and its property and casualty
subsidiaries from Rating Watch Evolving and assigned them a
Stable Outlook.
|
22 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
A.M. Best affirmed the Insurer Financial Strength Ratings and
Issuer Credit Ratings of the insurance subsidiaries of AIG, Inc.
In addition A.M. Best affirmed the Issuer Credit Rating of AIG,
Inc. These ratings were removed from Under Review with Negative
Implications and assigned a Negative Outlook.
|
Credit ratings estimate a companys ability to meet its
obligations and may directly affect the cost and availability to
that company of unsecured financing and its eligibility for
certain government sponsored funding programs such as the CPFF,
as discussed below. In the event of a further downgrade of
AIGs long-term senior debt ratings, AIGFP would be
required to post additional collateral and AIG or certain of
AIGFPs counterparties would be permitted to elect early
termination of contracts.
It is estimated that as of the close of business on
February 18, 2009, based on AIGFPs outstanding
municipal GIAs, secured funding arrangements and financial
derivative transactions (including AIGFPs super senior
credit default swap portfolio) at that date, a one-notch
downgrade of AIGs long-term senior debt ratings to Baa1 by
Moodys and BBB+ by S&P would permit counterparties to
make additional collateral calls and permit either AIGFP or the
counterparties to elect early termination of contracts,
resulting in up to approximately $8 billion of
corresponding collateral postings and termination payments, a
two-notch downgrade to Baa2 by Moodys and BBB by S&P
would result in approximately $2 billion in additional
collateral postings and termination payments, and a three-notch
downgrade to Baa3 by Moodys and BBB- by S&P would
result in approximately $1 billion in additional collateral
and termination payments.
The actual amount of collateral that AIGFP would be required to
post to counterparties in the event of such downgrades, or the
aggregate amount of payments that AIG could be required to make,
would depend on market conditions, the fair value of outstanding
affected transactions and other factors prevailing at the time
of the downgrade. If AIG is unable to secure sufficient
additional funding through the Fed Facility or otherwise, AIG
could become insolvent.
ILFC is a party to two Export Credit Agency (ECA) facilities
that require ILFC to segregate security deposits and maintenance
reserves related to aircraft financed under these facilities
into separate accounts in the event of a downgrade in
ILFCs credit ratings. In October 2008, Moodys
downgraded ILFCs debt ratings, and ILFC was subsequently
notified by the trustees under its ECA facilities that it would
be required to segregate security deposits and maintenance
reserves totaling approximately $260 million in separate
accounts. Further downgrades would impose additional
restrictions under these facilities, including the requirement
to segregate rental payments and would require prior consent to
withdraw funds from the segregated account.
For a further discussion of AIGs liquidity, see
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Capital Resources and
Liquidity Liquidity.
A downgrade in the short-term credit ratings of the
commercial paper programs of certain AIG affiliates could make
these issuers ineligible for participation in the
CPFF. AIG Funding and affiliates Curzon Funding
LLC and Nightingale Finance LLC currently obtain financing
through participation in the CPFF. As of February 18, 2009,
AIG Funding, Curzon Funding LLC and Nightingale Finance LLC had
$6.1 billion, $6.8 billion and $1.1 billion,
respectively, outstanding under the CPFF. However, in the event
of a downgrade of the short-term credit ratings applicable to
the commercial paper programs of these issuers, they may no
longer qualify for participation in the CPFF and would likely
have significant difficulty obtaining access to alternative
sources of liquidity. AIGs subsidiary, ILFC, participated
in the CPFF at December 31, 2008, but on January 21,
2009, S&P downgraded ILFCs short-term debt rating
and, as a result, ILFC lost access to the CPFF. The CPFF
purchases only U.S. dollar-denominated commercial paper
(including asset-backed commercial paper) that is rated at least
A-1/P-1/F1
by a major nationally recognized statistical rating organization
(NRSRO) or, if rated by multiple major NRSROs, is rated at least
A-1/P-1/F1
by two or more major NRSROs. Accordingly, these AIG entities
will lose access to the CPFF if:
|
|
|
|
|
AIG Fundings short-term rating is downgraded by any two of
S&P, Moodys or Fitch;
|
|
|
|
Curzon Funding LLCs short-term rating is downgraded by
either S&P or Moodys; or
|
|
|
|
Nightingale Finance LLCs short-term rating is downgraded
by either S&P or Moodys.
|
Adverse rating actions could result in further reductions in
credit limits extended to AIG and in a decline in the number of
counterparties willing to transact with AIG or its
affiliates. To appropriately manage risk, AIG
needs trading counterparties willing to extend sufficient credit
limits to purchase and sell securities, commodities and
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 23
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
other assets, as well as to conduct hedging activities. To the
extent that counterparties are unwilling to trade with or to
extend adequate credit limits to AIG or its subsidiaries, AIG
could be exposed to open positions or other unhedged risks,
resulting in increased volatility of results and increased
losses.
A downgrade in the Insurer Financial Strength ratings of
AIGs insurance companies could prevent the companies from
writing new business and retaining customers and
business. Insurer Financial Strength ratings are
an important factor in establishing the competitive position of
insurance companies. Insurer Financial Strength ratings measure
an insurance companys ability to meet its obligations to
contract holders and policyholders, help maintain public
confidence in a companys products, facilitate marketing of
products and enhance a companys competitive position.
Further downgrades of the Insurer Financial Strength ratings of
AIGs insurance companies may prevent these companies from
offering products and services or result in increased policy
cancellations or termination of assumed reinsurance contracts.
Moreover, a downgrade in AIGs credit ratings may, under
credit rating agency policies concerning the relationship
between parent and subsidiary ratings, result in a downgrade of
the Insurer Financial Strength ratings of AIGs insurance
subsidiaries.
Liquidity
AIG parents ability to access funds from its
subsidiaries is severely limited. As a holding
company, AIG parent depends significantly on dividends,
distributions and other payments from its subsidiaries to fund
payments due on AIGs obligations, including its debt
securities. Further, the majority of AIGs investments are
held by its regulated subsidiaries. In light of AIGs
current financial situation, many of AIGs regulated
subsidiaries have been significantly restricted from making
dividend payments, or advancing funds, to AIG, and AIG expects
these restrictions to continue. AIGs subsidiaries also are
limited in their ability to make dividend payments or advance
funds to AIG because of the need to retain funds to conduct
their own operations. These factors may hinder AIGs
ability to access funds that AIG may need to make payments on
its obligations, including those arising from day-to-day
business activities.
AIG parents ability to support its subsidiaries is
limited. Historically, AIG has provided capital
and liquidity to its subsidiaries to maintain regulatory capital
ratios, comply with rating agency requirements and meet
unexpected cash flow obligations. AIGs current limited
access to liquidity may reduce or prevent AIG from providing
support to its subsidiaries. If AIG is unable to provide support
to a subsidiary having an immediate capital need, the subsidiary
could become insolvent or, in the case of an insurance
subsidiary or other regulated entity, could be seized by its
regulator.
A significant portion of AIGs investments are illiquid
and are difficult to sell, or to sell in significant amounts at
acceptable prices, to generate cash to meet AIGs
needs. AIGs investments in certain
securities, including certain fixed income securities and
certain structured securities, direct private equities, limited
partnerships, hedge funds, mortgage loans, flight equipment,
finance receivables and real estate are illiquid. These asset
classes represented approximately 31 percent of the
carrying value of AIGs total cash and invested assets at
December 31, 2008. In addition, the steep decline in the
U.S. real estate market and the current disruption in the
credit markets have materially adversely affected the liquidity
of other AIG securities portfolios, including its residential
and commercial mortgage-backed securities portfolios. If AIG
requires significant amounts of cash on short notice in excess
of anticipated cash requirements or is required to post or
return collateral in connection with AIGFPs derivative
transactions, then AIG may have difficulty selling these
investments or terminating these transactions in a timely manner
or may be forced to sell or terminate them at unfavorable values.
If AIG fails to maintain compliance with the continued
listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), the
NYSE may initiate suspension and de-listing procedures, which
will have a material adverse effect on the liquidity of
AIGs common stock. AIGs common stock
and other securities are listed on the NYSE. AIG is subject to
the NYSEs continued listing requirements, including, among
other things, the requirement that AIG maintain an average
closing price equal to at least $1.00 over each consecutive
30-day
trading period. The share price of AIGs common stock has
declined significantly since the third quarter of 2008, and
recently has begun to close below $1.00. AIG has not been
informed of any non-compliance by the NYSE, but there is no
assurance that AIG will be able to maintain compliance with the
NYSEs continued listing standards or that, in the event of
non-compliance, the NYSE will not take action to suspend and
de-list AIGs securities from trading. A de-listing would
24 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
have a significant adverse effect on the liquidity of AIGs
common stock, making it more difficult and expensive for AIG to
raise additional capital.
Fed
Facility and Series D Preferred Stock
The Fed Credit Agreement and the Series D Preferred
Stock require AIG to devote significant resources to debt
repayment and preferred stock dividends for the foreseeable
future, thereby significantly reducing capital available for
other purposes. AIG is required to repay the
five-year Fed Facility primarily from the proceeds of sales of
assets, including businesses. The amount available under the Fed
Facility is permanently reduced by the amount of such repayments
as they are made. In addition, the $40 billion liquidation
preference of the Series D Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock (Series D Preferred Stock) issued to the
United States Department of the Treasury accumulates
dividends at 10 percent per year. These dividends, and the
dividends on any other series of preferred stock issued by AIG,
are not deductible for tax purposes.
AIGs significant obligations require it to dedicate all of
its proceeds from asset dispositions and a considerable portion
of its cash flows from operations to the repayment of the Fed
Facility, thereby reducing the funds available for investment in
its businesses. Moreover, because AIGs debt service and
preferred stock dividend obligations are very high, AIG may be
more vulnerable to competitive pressures and have less
flexibility to plan for or respond to changing business and
economic conditions.
A further inability to effect asset sales in accordance with its
asset disposition plan or to do so at acceptable prices could
result in AIG not being able to repay its borrowings under the
Fed Facility. See Capital Resources and Liquidity
Requirements Asset Disposition Plan for a discussion
of AIGs asset disposition plan.
Borrowings available to AIG under the Fed Facility may not be
sufficient to meet AIGs funding needs and additional
financing may not be available or could be prohibitively
expensive. Additional collateral calls, continued
high surrenders of annuity and other policies, further
downgrades in AIGs credit ratings or a further
deterioration in AIGFPs remaining super senior credit
default swap portfolio could cause AIG to require additional
funding in excess of the borrowings available under the Fed
Facility. In that event, AIG would be required to find
additional financing and new financing sources. In the current
business environment such financing could be difficult, if not
impossible, to obtain and, if available, very expensive, and
additional funding from the NY Fed, United States Department of
the Treasury or other government sources may not be available.
If AIG is unable to obtain sufficient financing to meet its
capital needs, AIG could become insolvent.
Borrowings under the Fed Facility are subject to the NY Fed
being satisfied with the collateral pledged by
AIG. A condition to borrowing under the Fed
Facility is that the NY Fed be satisfied with the collateral
pledged by AIG (including its value). It is possible that the NY
Fed may determine that AIGs collateral is insufficient to
permit a borrowing for many reasons including:
|
|
|
|
|
a decline in the value of AIGs businesses;
|
|
|
|
poor performance in one or more of AIGs
businesses; and
|
|
|
|
low prices received by AIG in its asset disposition plan.
|
Such a determination could limit AIGs ability to borrow
under the Fed Facility.
AIG must sell or otherwise dispose of significant assets to
service the debt under the Fed Facility. AIG must
make asset dispositions to repay the borrowings under the Fed
Facility. A continued delay or inability to effect these
dispositions at acceptable prices and on acceptable terms could
result in AIG being unable to repay the Fed Facility by its
maturity date.
While AIG has adopted an asset disposition plan, as discussed in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Liquidity
Asset Disposition Plan, this plan may not be successfully
executed due to, among other things:
|
|
|
|
|
an inability of purchasers to obtain funding due to the
deterioration in the credit markets;
|
|
|
|
a general unwillingness of potential buyers to commit capital in
the difficult current market environment;
|
|
|
|
an adverse change in interest rates and borrowing costs; and
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 25
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
continued declines in AIG asset values and deterioration in its
businesses.
|
Further, AIG may be unable to negotiate favorable terms in
connection with asset sales, including with respect to price. As
a result, AIG may need to modify its asset disposition plan to
sell additional or different assets.
If AIG is not able to repay the Fed Facility from the proceeds
of asset dispositions and cannot otherwise repay the Fed
Facility in accordance with its terms, an event of default would
result. In such an event, the NY Fed could enforce its security
interest in AIGs pledged collateral. In addition, an event
of default or declaration of acceleration under the Fed Credit
Agreement could also result in an event of default under other
agreements. In such an event, AIG would likely not have
sufficient liquid assets to meet its obligations under such
agreements.
The Fed Credit Agreement includes financial and other
covenants that impose restrictions on AIGs financial and
business operations. The Fed Credit Agreement
requires AIG to maintain a minimum aggregate liquidity level and
restricts AIGs ability to make certain capital
expenditures. The Fed Credit Agreement also restricts AIGs
and its restricted subsidiaries ability to incur
additional indebtedness, incur liens, merge, consolidate, sell
assets, enter into hedging transactions outside the normal
course of business, or pay dividends. These covenants could
restrict AIGs business and thereby adversely affect
AIGs results of operations.
Moreover, if AIG fails to comply with the covenants in the Fed
Credit Agreement and is unable to obtain a waiver or amendment,
an event of default would result. If an event of default were to
occur, the NY Fed could, among other things, declare outstanding
borrowings under the Fed Credit Agreement immediately due and
payable and enforce its security interest in AIGs pledged
collateral. In addition, an event of default or declaration of
acceleration under the Fed Credit Agreement could also result in
an event of default under AIGs other agreements.
AIGs results of operations and cash flows will be
materially and adversely affected by a significant increase in
interest expense and preferred stock dividends
paid. AIG expects its results of operations in
2009 and in future periods to be significantly adversely
affected by the recognition of interest expense on borrowings
under the Fed Facility and by the payment of significant
preferred stock dividends. In addition, the prepaid commitment
fee asset of $23 billion associated with the Series C
Preferred Stock (described below) was capitalized and is being
amortized through interest expense over the term of the Fed
Facility, which is five years.
The Series D Preferred Stock accrues dividends, payable if,
as and when declared, at a rate of 10 percent per annum, or
$4 billion, on the $40 billion of liquidation
preference, which are not tax deductible.
Controlling
Shareholder
Following the issuance of the Series C Preferred Stock
to the AIG Credit Facility Trust, a trust for the sole benefit
of the United States Treasury, the Trust, which is overseen by
three independent trustees, will hold a controlling interest in
AIG. AIGs interests and those of AIGs minority
shareholders may not be the same as those of the Trust or the
United States Treasury. In accordance with the
Fed Credit Agreement, in early March 2009, AIG expects to issue
100,000 shares of Series C Perpetual, Convertible,
Participating Preferred Stock, par value $5.00 per share and at
an initial liquidation preference of $5.00 per share (the
Series C Preferred Stock), to the AIG Credit Facility
Trust, a trust for the sole benefit of the United States
Treasury (together with its trustees, the Trust) established
under the AIG Credit Facility Trust Agreement dated as of
January 16, 2009 (as it may be amended from time to time,
the Trust Agreement). The Trust will hold the Series C
Preferred Stock for the sole benefit of the United States
Treasury. The Series C Preferred Stock is entitled to:
|
|
|
|
|
participate in any dividends paid on the common stock, with the
payments attributable to the Series C Preferred Stock being
approximately 77.9 percent of the aggregate dividends paid
on common stock, treating the Series C Preferred Stock as
converted; and
|
|
|
|
to the extent permitted by law, vote with AIGs common
stock on all matters submitted to AIGs shareholders and
hold approximately 77.9 percent of the aggregate voting
power of common stock, treating the Series C Preferred
Stock as converted.
|
The dividends payable on and the total voting power of
(i) the shares of common stock underlying the Series C
Preferred Stock, (ii) the 53,798,766 shares of common
stock underlying the warrants issued to the United States
Department of the Treasury on November 25, 2008 and
(iii) the shares of common stock underlying the warrants to
be issued to the United States Department of the Treasury in
connection with the capital commitment facility will
26 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
not exceed 79.9 percent of the aggregate dividends payable on
and the voting power of the outstanding shares of common stock,
treating the Series C Preferred Stock as converted.
The Series C Preferred Stock will remain outstanding even
if the Fed Facility is repaid in full or otherwise terminates.
In addition, upon shareholder approval and the filing with the
Delaware Secretary of State of certain amendments to AIGs
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, the Trust can convert at
its option all or a portion of the Series C Preferred Stock
into common stock.
As a result of its ownership of the Series C Preferred
Stock, the Trust will be able, subject to the terms of the Trust
Agreement and the Series C Preferred Stock, to elect all of
AIGs directors and will be able, to the extent permitted
by law, to control the vote on substantially all matters,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
approval of mergers or other business combinations;
|
|
|
|
a sale of all or substantially all of AIGs assets;
|
|
|
|
issuance of any additional common stock or other equity
securities;
|
|
|
|
the selection and tenure of AIGs Chief Executive Officer
and other executive officers; and
|
|
|
|
other matters that might be favorable to the United States
Treasury.
|
Moreover, the Trusts ability to prevent any change in
control of AIG could also have an adverse effect on the market
price of the common stock.
The Trust may also, subject to the terms of the Trust Agreement
and applicable securities laws, transfer all, or a portion of,
the Series C Preferred Stock to another person or entity
and, in the event of such a transfer, that person or entity
could become the controlling shareholder.
Possible future sales of Series C Preferred Stock or
common stock by the Trust could adversely affect the market for
AIG common stock. Pursuant to the Series C
Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 1,
2009, between the Trust and AIG (the Series C Preferred
Stock Purchase Agreement), AIG has agreed to file a shelf
registration statement that will allow the Trust to publicly
sell Series C Preferred Stock or any shares of common stock
it receives upon conversion of the Series C Preferred
Stock. In addition, the Trust could sell Series C Preferred
Stock or shares of common stock without registration under
certain circumstances, such as in a private transaction.
Although AIG can make no prediction as to the effect, if any,
that such sales would have on the market price of common stock,
sales of substantial amounts of Series C Preferred Stock or
common stock, or the perception that such sales could occur,
could adversely affect the market price of common stock. If the
Trust sells or transfers shares of Series C Preferred Stock
or common stock as a block, another person or entity could
become AIGs controlling shareholder.
Change
of Control
The issuance of the Series C Preferred Stock may have
adverse consequences for AIG and its subsidiaries with
regulators and contract counterparties. The
issuance of the Series C Preferred Stock will result in a
change of control of AIG. A change of control of AIG triggers
notice, approval and/or other regulatory requirements in many of
the more than 130 countries and jurisdictions in which AIG and
its subsidiaries operate. AIG has undertaken a worldwide review
of the regulatory requirements arising in connection with the
issuance of the Series C Preferred Stock, and has worked to
achieve material compliance with applicable regulatory
requirements. In this connection, AIG has submitted notices to
regulators in the jurisdictions where its principal businesses
are located, and currently has no knowledge that any regulator
intends to impose any penalties or take any other actions as a
result of the change in control of AIG in a manner that would be
adverse in any material respect to AIG. However, in light of the
large number of jurisdictions in which AIG and its subsidiaries
operate and the complexity of assessing and addressing the
regulatory requirements in each of the relevant jurisdictions,
AIG has not been able to obtain all regulatory consents or
approvals that may be required in connection with the issuance
of the Series C Preferred Stock. Accordingly, no assurances
can be provided that the failure to obtain all required consents
or approvals will not have a material adverse effect on
AIGs consolidated financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
AIG and its subsidiaries are also parties to various contracts
and other agreements that may be affected by a change of control
of AIG. Although AIG believes the change of control arising from
the issuance of the Series C
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 27
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Preferred Stock will not result in a breach of any material
contract or agreement, no assurances can be given that
AIGs counterparties to such contracts and agreements will
not claim that breaches have occurred. If AIG were to be found
to have breached any material contract or agreement, its
consolidated financial condition, results of operations or cash
flows could be materially adversely affected.
Concentration
of Investments and Exposures
Concentration of AIGs investment portfolios in any
particular segment of the economy may have adverse
effects. AIG results of operations have been
adversely affected and may continue to be adversely affected by
a concentration in residential mortgage-backed, commercial
mortgage-backed and other asset-backed securities. AIG also has
significant exposures to financial institutions and, in
particular, to money center and global banks. These types of
concentrations in AIGs investment portfolios could have an
adverse effect on the investment portfolios and consequently on
AIGs consolidated results of operations or financial
condition. While AIG seeks to mitigate this risk by having a
broadly diversified portfolio, events or developments that have
a negative effect on any particular industry, asset class, group
of related industries or geographic region may have a greater
adverse effect on the investment portfolios to the extent that
the portfolios are concentrated. Furthermore, AIGs ability
to sell assets relating to such particular groups of related
assets may be limited if other market participants are seeking
to sell at the same time.
Concentration of AIGs insurance and other risk
exposures may have adverse effects. AIG seeks to
manage the risks to which it is exposed as a result of the
insurance policies, derivatives and other obligations that it
undertakes to customers and counterparties by monitoring the
diversification of its exposures by exposure type, industry,
geographic region, counterparty and otherwise and by using
reinsurance, hedging and other arrangements to limit or offset
exposures that exceed the limits it wishes to retain. In certain
circumstances, or with respect to certain exposures, such risk
management arrangements may not be available on acceptable
terms, or AIGs exposure in absolute terms may be so large
that even slightly adverse experience compared to AIGs
expectations may cause a material adverse effect on AIGs
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Casualty
Insurance Underwriting and Reserves
Casualty insurance liabilities are difficult to predict and
may exceed the related reserves for losses and loss
expenses. AIG has announced that it intends to
focus its resources on its core property and casualty insurance
businesses while selling other businesses to repay the borrowing
under the Fed Credit Agreement. As a result, AIG expects to
become more reliant on these businesses.
Although AIG annually reviews the adequacy of the established
liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense, there
can be no assurance that AIGs loss reserves will not
develop adversely and have a material adverse effect on
AIGs results of operations. Estimation of ultimate net
losses, loss expenses and loss reserves is a complex process for
long-tail casualty lines of business, which include excess and
umbrella liability, D&O, professional liability, medical
malpractice, workers compensation, general liability,
products liability and related classes, as well as for asbestos
and environmental exposures. Generally, actual historical loss
development factors are used to project future loss development.
However, there can be no assurance that future loss development
patterns will be the same as in the past. Moreover, any
deviation in loss cost trends or in loss development factors
might not be discernible for an extended period of time
subsequent to the recording of the initial loss reserve
estimates for any accident year. Thus, there is the potential
for reserves with respect to a number of years to be
significantly affected by changes in loss cost trends or loss
development factors that were relied upon in setting the
reserves. These changes in loss cost trends or loss development
factors could be attributable to changes in inflation or in the
judicial environment, or in other social or economic phenomena
affecting claims, such as the effects that the recent disruption
in the credit markets could have on reported claims under
D&O or professional liability coverages. For a further
discussion of AIGs loss reserves see also
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations Segment
Results General Insurance Operations
Liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense.
28 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Catastrophe
Exposures
The occurrence of catastrophic events could adversely affect
AIGs consolidated financial condition or results of
operations. The occurrence of events such as
hurricanes, earthquakes, pandemic disease, acts of terrorism and
other catastrophes could adversely affect AIGs
consolidated financial condition or results of operations,
including by exposing AIGs businesses to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
widespread claim costs associated with property, workers
compensation, mortality and morbidity claims;
|
|
|
|
loss resulting from the value of invested assets declining to
below the amount required to meet policy and contract
liabilities; and
|
|
|
|
loss resulting from actual policy experience emerging adversely
in comparison to the assumptions made in the product pricing
related to mortality, morbidity, termination and expenses.
|
Reinsurance
Reinsurance may not be available or
affordable. AIG subsidiaries are major purchasers
of reinsurance and utilize reinsurance as part of AIGs
overall risk management strategy. Reinsurance is an important
risk management tool to manage transaction and insurance line
risk retention and to mitigate losses that may arise from
catastrophes. Market conditions beyond AIGs control
determine the availability and cost of the reinsurance purchased
by AIG subsidiaries. For example, reinsurance may be more
difficult to obtain after a year with a large number of major
catastrophes. Accordingly, AIG may be forced to incur additional
expenses for reinsurance or may be unable to obtain sufficient
reinsurance on acceptable terms, in which case AIG would have to
accept an increase in exposure risk, reduce the amount of
business written by its subsidiaries or seek alternatives.
Reinsurance subjects AIG to the credit risk of its reinsurers
and may not be adequate to protect AIG against
losses. Although reinsurance makes the reinsurer
liable to the AIG subsidiary to the extent the risk is ceded, it
does not relieve the AIG subsidiary of the primary liability to
its policyholders. Accordingly, AIG bears credit risk with
respect to its subsidiaries reinsurers to the extent not
mitigated by collateral or other credit enhancements. A
reinsurers insolvency or inability or refusal to make
timely payments under the terms of its agreements with the AIG
subsidiaries could have a material adverse effect on AIGs
results of operations and liquidity. For additional information
on AIGs reinsurance, see Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations Risk Management Reinsurance.
Policyholder
Behavior
AIGs policyholders, agents and other distributors of
AIGs insurance products have expressed significant
concerns in the wake of announcements by AIG of adverse
financial results. AIG expects that these concerns will be
exacerbated by the announcement of AIGs 2008
results. Many of AIGs businesses depend
upon the financial stability (both actual and perceived) of
AIGs parent company. Concerns that AIG or its subsidiaries
may not be able to meet their obligations have negatively
affected AIGs businesses in many ways, including:
|
|
|
|
|
requests by customers to withdraw funds from AIG under annuity
and certain life insurance contracts;
|
|
|
|
a refusal by independent agents, brokers and banks to continue
to offer AIG products and services;
|
|
|
|
a refusal of counterparties, customers or vendors to continue to
do business with AIG; and
|
|
|
|
requests by customers and other parties to terminate existing
contractual relationships.
|
Continued economic uncertainty, additional adverse results or a
lack of confidence in AIG and AIGs businesses may cause
AIG customers, agents and other distributors to cease or reduce
their dealings with AIG, turn to competitors or shift to
products that generate less income for AIG. Although AIG has
announced its intent to refocus its business and certain AIG
subsidiaries are rebranding themselves in an attempt to overcome
a perception of instability, AIG cannot be sure that such
efforts will be successful in attracting or maintaining clients.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 29
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Foreign
Operations
Foreign operations expose AIG to risks that may affect its
operations, liquidity and financial
condition. AIG provides insurance, investment and
other financial products and services to both businesses and
individuals in more than 130 countries and jurisdictions. A
substantial portion of AIGs General Insurance business and
a majority of its Life Insurance & Retirement Services
business is conducted outside the United States. Operations
outside the United States, particularly those in developing
nations, may be affected by regional economic downturns, changes
in foreign currency exchange rates, political upheaval,
nationalization and other restrictive government actions, which
could also affect other AIG operations.
The degree of regulation and supervision in foreign
jurisdictions varies. Generally, AIG, as well as its
subsidiaries operating in such jurisdictions, must satisfy local
regulatory requirements. Licenses issued by foreign authorities
to AIG subsidiaries are subject to modification and revocation.
Thus, AIGs insurance subsidiaries could be prevented from
conducting future business in certain of the jurisdictions where
they currently operate. Adverse actions from any single country
could adversely affect AIGs results of operations,
liquidity and financial condition depending on the magnitude of
the event and AIGs net financial exposure at that time in
that country.
Employees
Because of the decline in the value of equity awards
previously granted to employees and the uncertainty surrounding
AIGs asset disposition program, AIG may be unable to
retain key employees, including individuals critical to the
execution of its disposition plan. AIG relies
upon the knowledge and talent of its employees to successfully
conduct business. The decline in AIGs common stock price
has dramatically reduced the value of equity awards previously
granted to its key employees. Also, the announcement of proposed
asset dispositions has resulted in competitors seeking to hire
AIGs key employees. AIG has implemented retention programs
to seek to keep its key employees, but there can be no assurance
that the programs will be effective. A loss of key employees
could reduce the value of AIGs businesses and impair its
ability to effect a successful asset disposition plan.
A loss of key employees in AIGs financial reporting
process could prevent AIG from making required filings,
preparing financial statements and otherwise adversely affect
its internal controls. AIG relies upon the
knowledge and experience of the employees involved in these
functions for the effective and timely preparation of required
filings and financial statements and operation of internal
controls. If these employees depart, AIG may not be able to
replace them with individuals having comparable knowledge and
experience.
The limitations on incentive compensation contained in the
American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 may
adversely affect AIGs ability to retain its highest
performing employees. On February 17, 2009,
the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery
Act) was signed into law. The Recovery Act contains restrictions
on bonus and other incentive compensation payable to the five
executives named in a companys proxy statement and the
next twenty highest paid employees of companies receiving TARP
funds. Historically, AIG has embraced a pay-for-performance
philosophy. Depending upon the limitations placed on incentive
compensation by the final regulations issued under the Recovery
Act, it is possible that AIG may be unable to create a
compensation structure that permits AIG to retain its highest
performing employees. If this were to occur, AIGs asset
disposition plan, businesses and results of operations would be
adversely affected, perhaps materially.
Conflicts of interest may arise as AIG implements its asset
disposition plan. AIG relies on certain key
employees to operate its businesses during the asset disposition
period, to provide information to prospective buyers and to
maximize the value of businesses to be divested. The successful
completion of the asset disposition plan could be adversely
affected by any conflict of interests between AIG and its
employees arising as a result of the asset disposition process.
Employee error and misconduct may be difficult to detect and
prevent and may result in significant
losses. Losses may result from, among other
things, fraud, errors, failure to document transactions properly
or to obtain proper internal authorization or failure to comply
with regulatory requirements, both generally, and during the
asset disposition process. There have been a number of highly
publicized cases involving fraud or other misconduct by
employees in the financial services industry in recent years,
and AIG runs the risk that employee misconduct could occur. It
is not always possible to deter or prevent employee misconduct
and the controls that AIG has in place to prevent and detect
this activity may not be effective in all cases.
30 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Regulation
AIG is subject to extensive regulation in the jurisdictions
in which it conducts its businesses, and recent regulatory
actions have made it challenging for AIG to continue to engage
in business in the ordinary course. AIGs
operations around the world are subject to regulation by
different types of regulatory authorities, including insurance,
securities, investment advisory, banking and thrift regulators
in the United States and abroad. AIGs operations have
become more diverse and consumer-oriented, increasing the scope
of regulatory supervision and the possibility of intervention.
In light of AIGs liquidity issues beginning in the third
quarter of 2008, AIG and its regulated subsidiaries have been
subject to intense review and supervision around the world.
Regulators have taken significant steps to protect the
businesses of the entities they regulate. These steps have
included:
|
|
|
|
|
Restricting or prohibiting the payment of dividends to AIG;
|
|
|
|
Restricting or prohibiting other payments to AIG;
|
|
|
|
Requesting additional capital contributions by AIG;
|
|
|
|
Requesting that intercompany reinsurance reserves be covered by
assets locally;
|
|
|
|
Restricting the business in which the subsidiaries may
engage; and
|
|
|
|
Requiring pre-approval of all proposed transactions between the
regulated subsidiaries and AIG or any affiliate.
|
AIG does not expect these conditions to change unless its
financial situation stabilizes.
Adjustments
to Life Insurance & Retirement Services Deferred
Policy Acquisition Costs
Interest rate fluctuations, increased surrenders and other
events may require AIG subsidiaries to accelerate the
amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs (DAC) which
could adversely affect AIGs consolidated financial
condition or results of operations. DAC
represents the costs that vary with and are related primarily to
the acquisition of new and renewal insurance and annuity
contracts. When interest rates rise or customers lose confidence
in a company, policy loans and policy surrenders and withdrawals
of life insurance policies and annuity contracts may increase as
policyholders seek to buy products with perceived higher returns
or more stability, requiring AIG subsidiaries to accelerate the
amortization of DAC. To the extent such amortization exceeds
surrender or other charges earned upon surrender and withdrawals
of certain life insurance policies and annuity contracts,
AIGs results of operations could be negatively affected.
DAC for both insurance-oriented and investment-oriented
products, as well as retirement services products is reviewed
for recoverability, which involves estimating the future
profitability of current business. This review involves
significant management judgment. If the actual emergence of
future profitability were to be substantially lower than
estimated, AIG could be required to accelerate its DAC
amortization and such acceleration could adversely affect
AIGs results of operations. For a further discussion of
DAC, see also Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Estimates and Notes 1 and 8 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
Risk
Management
AIG is exposed to a number of significant risks, and
AIGs risk management policies, processes and controls may
not be effective in mitigating AIGs risk exposures in all
market conditions and to all types of risk. The
major risks to which AIG is exposed include credit risk, market
risk, including credit spread risk, operational risk, liquidity
risk and insurance risk. Given continued capital markets
volatility, persistent risk aversion, inadequate liquidity in
the markets of many asset classes, combined with AIGs
weakened financial condition, AIG may not have adequate risk
management policies, tools and processes and AIG may not have
sufficient access to the markets and trading counterparties to
effectively implement risk mitigating strategies and techniques.
This environment could materially and adversely affect
AIGs consolidated results of operations, liquidity or
financial condition, result in regulatory action or litigation
or further damage AIGs reputation. For a further
discussion of AIGs risk management process and controls,
see Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations Risk Management.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 31
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Operational risks of asset dispositions. AIG
is exposed to various operational risks associated with the
dispositions of subsidiaries and the resulting restructuring of
AIG at the business and corporate levels. These risks include
the ability to deconsolidate systems and processes of divested
operations without adversely affecting AIG, the ability of AIG
to fulfill its obligations under any transition separation
agreements agreed upon with buyers, the ability of AIG to
downsize the corporation as dispositions are accomplished and
the ability of AIG to continue to provide services previously
performed by divested entities.
AIGFP wind-down risks. An orderly and
successful wind-down of AIGFPs businesses and portfolios
is subject to numerous risks, including market conditions,
counterparty willingness to transact, or terminate transactions,
with AIGFP and the retention of key personnel. An orderly and
successful wind-down will also depend on the stability of
AIGs credit ratings. Further downgrades of AIGs
credit ratings likely would have an adverse effect on the
wind-down of AIGFPs businesses and portfolios.
Use
of Estimates
If actual experience differs from managements estimates
used in the preparation of financial statements, AIGs
consolidated results of operations or financial condition could
be adversely affected. The preparation of
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States requires the application
of accounting policies that often involve a significant degree
of judgment. AIG considers that its accounting policies that are
most dependent on the application of estimates and assumptions,
and therefore viewed as critical accounting estimates, are those
described in Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Critical Accounting Estimates. These accounting estimates
require the use of assumptions, some of which are highly
uncertain at the time of estimation. For example, recent market
volatility and declines in liquidity have made it more difficult
to value certain of AIGs invested assets and the
obligations and collateral relating to certain financial
instruments issued or held by AIG, such as AIGFPs super
senior credit default swap portfolio. Additionally, the
recoverability of deferred tax assets depends in large part on
assumptions about future profitability. These estimates, by
their nature, are based on judgment and current facts and
circumstances. Therefore, actual results could differ from these
estimates, possibly in the near term, and could have a material
effect on the consolidated financial statements.
Legal
Proceedings
Significant legal proceedings may adversely affect AIGs
results of operations. AIG is party to numerous
legal proceedings, including securities class actions and
regulatory or governmental investigations. Due to the nature of
the litigation, the lack of precise damage claims and the type
of claims made against AIG, AIG cannot currently quantify its
ultimate liability for these actions. It is possible that
developments in these unresolved matters could have a material
adverse effect on AIGs consolidated financial condition or
consolidated results of operations for an individual reporting
period. For a discussion of these unresolved matters, see
Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Aircraft
Suppliers
There are limited suppliers of aircraft and
engines. The supply of jet transport aircraft,
which ILFC purchases and leases, is dominated by two airframe
manufacturers, Boeing and Airbus, and a limited number of engine
manufacturers. As a result, ILFC is dependent on the
manufacturers success in remaining financially stable,
producing aircraft and related components which meet the
airlines demands, both in type and quantity, and
fulfilling their contractual obligations to ILFC. Competition
between the manufacturers for market share is intense and may
lead to instances of deep discounting for certain aircraft types
that could negatively affect ILFCs competitive pricing.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
Unresolved
Staff Comments
|
There are no material unresolved written comments that were
received from the SEC staff 180 days or more before the end
of AIGs fiscal year relating to AIGs periodic or
current reports under the Exchange Act.
32 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
AIG and its subsidiaries operate from approximately 2,000
offices in the United States, 41 in Puerto Rico, 8 in Canada and
numerous offices in over 100 foreign countries. The offices in
Greensboro and Winston-Salem, North Carolina; Springfield,
Illinois; Amarillo, Ft. Worth, Houston and Lewisville,
Texas; Wilmington, Delaware; San Juan, Puerto Rico; Tampa,
Florida; Livingston, New Jersey; Evansville, Indiana; Nashville,
Tennessee; 70 Pine Street, 72 Wall Street and 175 Water Street
in New York, New York; and offices in more than 30 foreign
countries and jurisdictions including Bermuda, Chile, Hong Kong,
the Philippines, Japan, the U.K., Singapore, Malaysia,
Switzerland, Taiwan and Thailand are located in buildings owned
by AIG and its subsidiaries. The remainder of the office space
utilized by AIG subsidiaries is leased.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
For a discussion of legal proceedings, see Note 14(a) to
the Consolidated Financial Statements, which is incorporated
herein by reference.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders
during the fourth quarter of 2008.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 33
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Part II
|
|
Item 5.
|
Market
for the Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
AIGs common stock is listed on the New York Stock
Exchange, as well as on the stock exchanges in Ireland and Tokyo.
The following table presents the high and low closing sales
prices on the New York Stock Exchange Composite Tape and the
dividends paid per share of AIGs common stock for each
quarter of 2008 and 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Paid
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
Paid
|
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
59.32
|
|
|
$
|
39.80
|
|
|
$
|
0.200
|
|
|
$
|
72.15
|
|
|
$
|
66.77
|
|
|
$
|
0.165
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
|
49.04
|
|
|
|
26.46
|
|
|
|
0.200
|
|
|
|
72.65
|
|
|
|
66.49
|
|
|
|
0.165
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
|
30.10
|
|
|
|
2.05
|
|
|
|
0.220
|
|
|
|
70.44
|
|
|
|
61.64
|
|
|
|
0.200
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
|
4.00
|
|
|
|
1.35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70.11
|
|
|
|
51.33
|
|
|
|
0.200
|
|
The approximate number of record holders of common stock as of
January 30, 2009 was 58,182.
Under the Fed Credit Agreement, AIG is restricted from paying
dividends on its common stock.
For a discussion of certain restrictions on the payment of
dividends to AIG by some of its insurance subsidiaries, see
Item 1A. Risk Factors Liquidity AIG
parents ability to access funds from its subsidiaries is
severely limited, and Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
AIGs table of equity compensation plans previously
approved by security holders and equity compensation plans not
previously approved by security holders will be included in the
definitive proxy statement for AIGs 2009 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders, which will be filed with the SEC no later than
120 days after the close of AIGs fiscal year pursuant
to Regulation 14A.
34 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Performance
Graph
The following Performance Graph compares the cumulative total
shareholder return on AIG common stock for a five-year period
(December 31, 2003 to December 31, 2008) with the
cumulative total return of the S&Ps 500 stock index
(which includes AIG) and a peer group of companies consisting of
nine insurance companies to which AIG compares its business and
operations: ACE Limited, Aflac Incorporated, The Chubb
Corporation, The Hartford Financial Services Group, Inc.,
Lincoln National Corporation, MetLife, Inc., Prudential
Financial, Inc., The Travelers Companies, Inc. (formerly The St.
Paul Travelers Companies, Inc.) and XL Capital Ltd.
FIVE-YEAR
CUMULATIVE TOTAL SHAREHOLDER RETURNS
Value of $100 Invested on December 31, 2003
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2003
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
AIG
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
99.48
|
|
|
|
$
|
104.31
|
|
|
|
$
|
110.62
|
|
|
|
$
|
91.00
|
|
|
|
$
|
2.64
|
|
|
S&P 500
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
110.88
|
|
|
|
|
116.33
|
|
|
|
|
134.70
|
|
|
|
|
142.10
|
|
|
|
|
89.53
|
|
|
Peer Group
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
|
115.57
|
|
|
|
|
142.12
|
|
|
|
|
164.44
|
|
|
|
|
171.76
|
|
|
|
|
99.39
|
|
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 35
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
Item 6.
|
Selected
Financial Data
|
American
International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Selected Consolidated Financial Data
The Selected Consolidated Financial Data should be read in
conjunction with Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the
consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes
included elsewhere herein.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006(a)
|
|
|
2005(a)
|
|
|
2004(a)
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues(b)(c):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and other considerations
|
|
$
|
83,505
|
|
|
$
|
79,302
|
|
|
$
|
74,213
|
|
|
$
|
70,310
|
|
|
$
|
66,704
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
12,222
|
|
|
|
28,619
|
|
|
|
26,070
|
|
|
|
22,584
|
|
|
|
19,007
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses)
|
|
|
(55,484
|
)
|
|
|
(3,592
|
)
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
Unrealized market valuation losses on AIGFP super senior credit
default swap portfolio
|
|
|
(28,602
|
)
|
|
|
(11,472
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
(537
|
)
|
|
|
17,207
|
|
|
|
12,998
|
|
|
|
15,546
|
|
|
|
12,068
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
11,104
|
|
|
|
110,064
|
|
|
|
113,387
|
|
|
|
108,781
|
|
|
|
97,823
|
|
Benefits, claims and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policyholder benefits and claims incurred
|
|
|
63,299
|
|
|
|
66,115
|
|
|
|
60,287
|
|
|
|
64,100
|
|
|
|
58,600
|
|
Policy acquisition and other insurance expenses(f)
|
|
|
27,565
|
|
|
|
20,396
|
|
|
|
19,413
|
|
|
|
17,773
|
|
|
|
16,049
|
|
Interest expense(g)
|
|
|
17,007
|
|
|
|
4,751
|
|
|
|
3,657
|
|
|
|
2,572
|
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
Restructuring expenses and related asset impairment and other
expenses
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
11,236
|
|
|
|
9,859
|
|
|
|
8,343
|
|
|
|
9,123
|
|
|
|
6,316
|
|
Total benefits, claims and expenses
|
|
|
119,865
|
|
|
|
101,121
|
|
|
|
91,700
|
|
|
|
93,568
|
|
|
|
82,978
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit), minority
interest and cumulative effect of change in accounting
principles(b)(c)(d)(e)
|
|
|
(108,761
|
)
|
|
|
8,943
|
|
|
|
21,687
|
|
|
|
15,213
|
|
|
|
14,845
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)(h)
|
|
|
(8,374
|
)
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
|
|
6,537
|
|
|
|
4,258
|
|
|
|
4,407
|
|
Income (loss) before minority interest and cumulative effect of
change in accounting principles
|
|
|
(100,387
|
)
|
|
|
7,488
|
|
|
|
15,150
|
|
|
|
10,955
|
|
|
|
10,438
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
|
|
(1,288
|
)
|
|
|
(1,136
|
)
|
|
|
(478
|
)
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principles
|
|
|
(99,289
|
)
|
|
|
6,200
|
|
|
|
14,014
|
|
|
|
10,477
|
|
|
|
9,983
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(99,289
|
)
|
|
|
6,200
|
|
|
|
14,048
|
|
|
|
10,477
|
|
|
|
9,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principles
|
|
|
(37.84
|
)
|
|
|
2.40
|
|
|
|
5.38
|
|
|
|
4.03
|
|
|
|
3.83
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(37.84
|
)
|
|
|
2.40
|
|
|
|
5.39
|
|
|
|
4.03
|
|
|
|
3.77
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principles
|
|
|
(37.84
|
)
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
|
|
5.35
|
|
|
|
3.99
|
|
|
|
3.79
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.06
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(37.84
|
)
|
|
|
2.39
|
|
|
|
5.36
|
|
|
|
3.99
|
|
|
|
3.73
|
|
Dividends declared per common share
|
|
|
0.42
|
|
|
|
0.77
|
|
|
|
0.65
|
|
|
|
0.63
|
|
|
|
0.29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year-end balance sheet data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
860,418
|
|
|
|
1,048,361
|
|
|
|
979,410
|
|
|
|
853,048
|
|
|
|
801,007
|
|
Long-term debt(i)
|
|
|
177,485
|
|
|
|
162,935
|
|
|
|
135,316
|
|
|
|
100,314
|
|
|
|
86,653
|
|
Commercial paper and extendible commercial notes(j)
|
|
|
15,718
|
|
|
|
13,114
|
|
|
|
13,363
|
|
|
|
9,535
|
|
|
|
10,246
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
807,708
|
|
|
|
952,560
|
|
|
|
877,542
|
|
|
|
766,545
|
|
|
|
721,135
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
52,710
|
|
|
$
|
95,801
|
|
|
$
|
101,677
|
|
|
$
|
86,317
|
|
|
$
|
79,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period
amounts to conform to the current period presentation. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
In 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and 2004, includes
other-than-temporary impairment charges of $50.8 billion,
$4.7 billion, $944 million, $598 million and
$684 million, respectively. Also includes gains (losses)
from hedging activities that did not qualify for hedge
accounting treatment under FAS 133, including the related
foreign exchange gains and losses. In 2008, 2007, 2006, 2005 and
2004, respectively, the effect was $(4.0) billion,
$(1.44) billion, $(1.87) billion, $2.02 billion,
and $385 million in revenues and $(4.0) billion,
$(1.44) billion, $(1.87) billion, $2.02 billion
and $671 million in operating income. These amounts result
primarily from interest rate and foreign currency derivatives
that are effective economic hedges of investments and
borrowings. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes an other-than-temporary impairment charge of
$643 million on AIGFPs available for sale investment
securities reported in other income in 2007. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes current year catastrophe-related losses of
$1.8 billion in 2008, $276 million in 2007,
$3.28 billion in 2005 and $1.16 billion in 2004. There
were no significant catastrophe-related losses in 2006. |
|
(e) |
|
Reduced by fourth quarter charges of $1.8 billion and
$850 million in 2005 and 2004, respectively, related to the
annual review of General Insurance loss and loss adjustment
reserves. In 2006, 2005 and 2004, changes in estimates for
asbestos and environmental reserves were $198 million,
$873 million and $850 million, respectively. |
|
(f) |
|
In 2008, includes goodwill impairment charges of
$3.2 billion. |
|
(g) |
|
In 2008, includes $11.4 billion of interest expense on
the Fed Facility, which was comprised of $9.3 billion of
amortization on the prepaid commitment fee asset associated with
the Fed Facility and $2.1 billion of accrued compounding
interest. |
|
(h) |
|
In 2008, includes a $20.6 billion valuation allowance to
reduce AIGs deferred tax asset to an amount AIG believes
is more likely than not to be realized, and a $5.5 billion
deferred tax expense attributable to the potential sale of
foreign businesses. |
|
(i) |
|
Includes that portion of long-term debt maturing in less than
one year. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements. |
|
(j) |
|
Includes borrowings of $6.8 billion, $6.6 billion
and $1.7 billion for AIGFP, AIG Funding and ILFC,
respectively, under the CPFF at December 31, 2008. |
See Note 1(ff) to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
effects of adopting new accounting standards.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 37
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
Item 7.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
Throughout this Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations, AIG presents its
operations in the way it believes will be most meaningful.
Statutory underwriting profit (loss) is presented in accordance
with accounting principles prescribed by insurance regulatory
authorities because these are standard measures of performance
used in the insurance industry and thus allow more meaningful
comparisons with AIGs insurance competitors. AIG has also
incorporated into this discussion a number of cross-references
to additional information included throughout this Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
to assist readers seeking additional information related to a
particular subject.
|
|
|
|
|
Index
|
|
Page
|
|
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
|
|
|
39
|
|
Overview
|
|
|
39
|
|
Liquidity Events in the Second Half of 2008
|
|
|
40
|
|
Debt
|
|
|
53
|
|
Results of Operations
|
|
|
63
|
|
Consolidated Results
|
|
|
63
|
|
Segment Results
|
|
|
71
|
|
General Insurance Operations
|
|
|
71
|
|
Liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense
|
|
|
79
|
|
Life Insurance & Retirement Services Operations
|
|
|
99
|
|
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs and Sales Inducement Assets
|
|
|
113
|
|
Financial Services Operations
|
|
|
115
|
|
Asset Management Operations
|
|
|
119
|
|
Critical Accounting Estimates
|
|
|
123
|
|
Capital Resources and Liquidity
|
|
|
152
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
152
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
154
|
|
Investment Strategy
|
|
|
155
|
|
Portfolio Review
|
|
|
167
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairments
|
|
|
167
|
|
Unrealized gains and losses
|
|
|
171
|
|
Risk Management
|
|
|
172
|
|
Overview
|
|
|
172
|
|
Corporate Risk Management
|
|
|
173
|
|
Credit Risk Management
|
|
|
174
|
|
Market Risk Management
|
|
|
176
|
|
Operational Risk Management
|
|
|
178
|
|
Insurance Risk Management
|
|
|
179
|
|
Segment Risk Management
|
|
|
181
|
|
Insurance Operations
|
|
|
181
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
|
185
|
|
Asset Management
|
|
|
188
|
|
Recent Accounting Standards
|
|
|
189
|
|
38 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Cautionary
Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and other publicly available documents may include, and
AIGs officers and representatives may from time to time
make, projections and statements which may constitute
forward-looking statements within the meaning of the
Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These
projections and statements are not historical facts but instead
represent only AIGs belief regarding future events, many
of which, by their nature, are inherently uncertain and outside
AIGs control. These projections and statements may
address, among other things, the outcome of proposed
transactions with the NY Fed and the United States Department of
the Treasury, the number, size, terms, cost and timing of
dispositions and their potential effect on AIGs
businesses, financial condition, results of operations, cash
flows and liquidity (and AIG at any time and from time to time
may change its plans with respect to the sale of one or more
businesses), AIGs exposures to subprime mortgages,
monoline insurers and the residential and commercial real estate
markets and AIGs strategy for growth, product development,
market position, financial results and reserves. It is possible
that AIGs actual results and financial condition will
differ, possibly materially, from the anticipated results and
financial condition indicated in these projections and
statements. Factors that could cause AIGs actual results
to differ, possibly materially, from those in the specific
projections and statements include a failure to complete the
proposed transactions with the NY Fed and the United States
Department of the Treasury, developments in global credit
markets and such other factors as discussed throughout this
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations and in Item 1A. Risk Factors of
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
AIG is not under any obligation (and expressly disclaims any
obligation) to update or alter any projection or other
statement, whether written or oral, that may be made from time
to time, whether as a result of new information, future events
or otherwise.
Overview
Operations
AIG identifies its operating segments by product line,
consistent with its management structure. These segments are
General Insurance, Life Insurance & Retirement
Services, Financial Services and Asset Management. Through these
operating segments, AIG provides insurance, financial and
investment products and services to both businesses and
individuals in more than 130 countries and jurisdictions.
AIGs subsidiaries serve commercial, institutional and
individual customers through an extensive property-casualty and
life insurance and retirement services network. AIGs
Financial Services businesses include commercial aircraft and
equipment leasing, capital markets operations and consumer
finance, both in the United States and abroad. AIG also provides
asset management services to institutions and individuals.
General
Business Environment
The 2008 business environment was one of the most difficult in
recent decades. In the U.S., real GDP shrank at annual rates of
more than 4 percent in the second half of the year and
almost 4 percent in the fourth quarter alone. At the
beginning of 2008, the unemployment rate was 4.9 percent
and by year-end was 7.2 percent.
The strong declines in the overall U.S. economy during the
second half of 2008 occurred despite repeated reductions of
interest rates by the Federal Reserve, the creation of numerous
credit facilities for the banking system and the passage of a
stimulus package.
Consideration
of AIGs Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
In connection with the preparation of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
management has assessed whether AIG has the ability to continue
as a going concern (See Note 1 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements). In making this assessment, AIG has
considered:
|
|
|
|
|
The commitment of the NY Fed and the United States Department of
the Treasury to the orderly restructuring of AIG and their
commitment to continuing to work with AIG to maintain its
ability to meet its obligations as they come due;
|
|
|
|
The liquidity events in the second half of 2008, including
transactions with the NY Fed and the United States Department of
the Treasury;
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 39
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
AIGs liquidity-related actions and plans to stabilize its
businesses and repay the Fed Facility;
|
|
|
|
The level of AIGs realized and unrealized losses and the
negative impact of these losses in shareholders equity and
on the capital levels of AIGs insurance subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
The substantial resolution of the liquidity issues surrounding
AIGFPs multi-sector super senior credit default swap
portfolio and the U.S. securities lending program;
|
|
|
|
The additional capital provided to AIG by the United States
Department of the Treasury;
|
|
|
|
Anticipated transactions with the NY Fed and the United States
Department of the Treasury;
|
|
|
|
The continuing liquidity issues in AIGs businesses and
AIGs actions to address such issues; and
|
|
|
|
The substantial risks to which AIG is subject.
|
Each of these items is discussed in more detail below.
In considering these items, management has made significant
judgments and estimates with respect to the potentially adverse
financial and liquidity effects of AIGs risks and
uncertainties. Management has also assessed other items and
risks arising in AIGs businesses and made reasonable
judgments and estimates with respect thereto. After
consideration, management believes that it will have adequate
liquidity to finance and operate AIGs businesses and
continue as a going concern for at least the next twelve months.
It is possible that the actual outcome of one or more of
managements plans could be materially different or that
one or more of managements significant judgments or
estimates about the potential effects of the risks and
uncertainties could prove to be materially incorrect or that the
principal transactions disclosed in Note 23 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements (and as discussed below) are
not consummated. If one or more of these possible outcomes is
realized, AIG may need additional U.S. government support
to meet its obligations as they come due.
Liquidity
Liquidity
Events in the Second Half of 2008
In the second half of 2008, AIG experienced an unprecedented
strain on liquidity. This strain led to a series of transactions
with the NY Fed and the United States Department of the
Treasury. The two principal causes of the liquidity strain were
demands for the return of cash collateral under the
U.S. securities lending program and collateral calls on
AIGFPs super senior multi-sector CDO credit default swap
portfolio.
Under AIGs securities lending program, cash collateral was
received from borrowers in exchange for loans of securities
owned by AIGs insurance company subsidiaries. The cash was
invested by AIG in fixed income securities, primarily
residential mortgage-backed securities (RMBS), to earn a spread.
During September 2008, borrowers began in increasing numbers to
request a return of their cash collateral. Because of the
illiquidity in the market for RMBS, AIG was unable to sell RMBS
at acceptable prices and was forced to find alternative sources
of cash to meet these requests. As of the end of August,
AIGs U.S. securities lending program had
approximately $69 billion of borrowings outstanding. See
Investments Securities Lending Activities for
additional information about the securities lending program.
Additionally, throughout the second half of 2008, declines in
the fair values of the super senior multi-sector CDO securities
protected by AIGFPs credit default swap portfolio,
together with ratings downgrades of the CDO securities, resulted
in AIGFP being required to post significant additional
collateral. As of the end of August 2008, AIG had posted
approximately $19.7 billion of collateral under its super
senior credit default swap portfolio. See Critical Accounting
Estimates Fair Value Measurements of Certain
Financial Assets and Liabilities for additional information
about AIGFPs super senior multi-sector CDO credit default
swap portfolio.
Both of these liquidity strains were significantly exacerbated
by the downgrades of AIGs long-term debt ratings by
S&P, Moodys and Fitch on September 15, 2008.
40 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Arrangements
with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and the United States
Department of the Treasury
Fed
Credit Agreement
Because of these immediate liquidity requirements, AIGs
Board of Directors determined that the only viable alternative
was to accept an arrangement offered by the NY Fed, and on
September 16, 2008, approved borrowing from the NY Fed
based on a term sheet that set forth the terms of the secured
credit agreement and related equity participation. Over the next
six days, AIG elected Edward M. Liddy Director, Chairman and
CEO, replacing Robert Willumstad in those positions, negotiated
a definitive credit agreement with the NY Fed and borrowed, on a
secured basis, approximately $37 billion from the NY Fed,
enabling AIG to meet its liquidity requirements before formally
entering into a credit agreement with the NY Fed.
On September 22, 2008, AIG entered into the Fed Credit
Agreement in the form of a two-year secured loan and the Pledge
Agreement with the NY Fed. On November 9, 2008, AIG and the
NY Fed agreed to amend the Fed Credit Agreement to reduce the
total commitment under the Fed Facility to $60 billion
following the issuance of the Series D Preferred Stock
(described below), extend the term of the Fed Facility to
5 years and reduce the related interest and fees payable
under the Fed Facility. See Note 13 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for information regarding the terms of and
borrowings under the Fed Credit Agreement.
Series D
Preferred Stock Issuance
On November 25, 2008, AIG entered into a Securities
Purchase Agreement (the Series D Preferred Stock Purchase
Agreement) with the United States Department of the Treasury
pursuant to which, among other things, AIG issued and sold to
the United States Department of the Treasury, as part of the
Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and the Systemically
Significant Failing Institutions Program, $40 billion of
Series D Preferred Stock, and a warrant to purchase
53,798,766 shares of common stock (the Warrant). The
proceeds from the sale of the Series D Preferred Stock and
the Warrant were used to repay borrowings under the Fed
Facility. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for further information on the Series D
Preferred Stock and the Warrant.
Termination
of $62 billion of CDS
On November 25, 2008, AIG entered into a Master Investment
and Credit Agreement (the ML III Agreement) with the NY Fed,
Maiden Lane III LLC (ML III), and The Bank of New York
Mellon, which established arrangements, through ML III, to fund
the purchase of the multi-sector CDOs underlying or related to
certain credit default swaps and other similar derivative
instruments (CDS) written by AIG Financial Products Corp. in
connection with the termination of such CDS transactions.
Concurrently, AIG Financial Products Corp.s counterparties
to such CDS transactions agreed to terminate those CDS
transactions relating to the multi-sector CDOs purchased from
them by ML III. Through December 31, 2008, ML III had
purchased from counterparties a total of $62.1 billion in
par amount of CDO securities, and the associated credit default
swaps had been terminated. Approximately $12.2 billion
notional amount of AIG Financial Products Corp.s CDS
transactions referencing super senior multi-sector CDOs remained
outstanding as of February 18, 2009. See Note 5 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for further information on the
transactions with ML III.
Resolution
of U.S. Securities Lending Program
On December 12, 2008, AIG, certain of AIGs wholly
owned U.S. life insurance subsidiaries, and AIG Securities
Lending Corp. (the AIG Agent), another AIG subsidiary, entered
into an Asset Purchase Agreement (the ML II Agreement) with
Maiden Lane II LLC (ML II), a Delaware limited liability
company whose sole member is the NY Fed.
Pursuant to the ML II Agreement, the life insurance subsidiaries
sold to ML II all of their undivided interests in a pool of
$39.3 billion face amount of RMBS held by the AIG Agent as
agent of the life insurance subsidiaries in connection with
AIGs U.S. securities lending program. In exchange for
the RMBS, the life insurance subsidiaries received an initial
purchase price of approximately $19.8 billion plus the
right to receive deferred contingent portions of the total
purchase price of $1 billion plus participation in the
residual, each of which is subordinated to the repayment of the
NY Fed loan to ML II. These life insurance subsidiaries applied
the net cash proceeds of sale of
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 41
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
the RMBS toward the amounts due by such life insurance
subsidiaries in terminating both the U.S. securities
lending program and the interim agreement entered into with the
NY Fed whereby the NY Fed borrowed securities from AIG
subsidiaries in exchange for cash collateral. See
Investments Securities Lending Activities and
Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further
information on the transaction with ML II.
AIG
Affiliates Participate in the NY Feds Commercial Paper
Funding Facility
On October 27, 2008, four affiliates of AIG (including
ILFC) applied for participation in the CPFF. Currently, AIG
Funding, Inc., an AIG subsidiary, and two of AIGFPs
sponsored vehicles, Curzon Funding LLC and Nightingale Finance
LLC may issue up to approximately $6.9 billion,
$7.2 billion and $1.1 billion, respectively, of
commercial paper under the CPFF. AIG Funding uses the proceeds
to refinance AIGs outstanding commercial paper as it
matures, meet other working capital needs and make prepayments
under the Fed Facility while the two other programs use the
proceeds to refinance maturing commercial paper. On
January 21, 2009, S&P downgraded ILFCs
short-term credit rating and, as a result, ILFC can no longer
participate in the CPFF.
Series C
Preferred Stock Issuance
On March 1, 2009, AIG entered into the Series C Preferred
Stock Purchase Agreement with the Trust, pursuant to which AIG
agreed to issue and sell 100,000 shares of Series C
Preferred Stock to the Trust. AIG expects to issue the
Series C Preferred Stock to the Trust in early March, 2009.
The aggregate purchase price for the Series C Preferred
Stock was $500,000, with an understanding that additional and
independently sufficient consideration was also furnished in
September 2008 by the NY Fed in the form of its $85 billion
lending commitment under the Fed Credit Agreement.
The Series C Preferred Stock Purchase Agreement, among
other things:
|
|
|
|
|
provides the Trust with rights to require registration of the
Series C Preferred Stock under the Securities Act of 1933 and
for AIG to facilitate other dispositions;
|
|
|
|
prohibits AIG from issuing capital stock without the approval of
the Trust so long as the Trust owns 50 percent of the
Series C Preferred Stock, subject to certain exceptions
relating to existing obligations and employee benefit plans;
|
|
|
|
requires AIG and its Board of Directors to work in good faith
with the Trust to ensure satisfactory corporate governance
arrangements;
|
|
|
|
requires the following proposals to be presented to AIGs
shareholders at AIGs 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
to amend AIGs Restated Certificate of Incorporation to
permit AIGs Board of Directors to issue classes of
preferred stock that are not of equal rank and cause the
Series D Preferred Stock and any other series of preferred
stock subsequently issued to the United States Department of the
Treasury to rank senior to the Series C Preferred Stock and
any other subsequently issued series of preferred stock that is
not issued to the United States Department of the Treasury; and
|
|
|
|
to eliminate any restriction on the pledging of all or
substantially all of AIGs properties or assets; and
|
|
|
|
|
|
requires the following proposals to be presented to AIGs
shareholders at a special shareholders meeting or at a
future annual shareholders meeting following notice from
the Trust:
|
|
|
|
|
|
to amend AIGs Restated Certificate of Incorporation to
decrease the par value of AIGs common stock, increase the
authorized number of shares of common stock and, if these
amendments are not approved;
|
|
|
|
to amend the terms of AIGs Restated Certificate of
Incorporation to decrease the par value of AIGs serial
preferred stock and increase the number of authorized shares of
AIGs serial preferred stock, and amend the terms of the
Series C Preferred Stock to increase the number of shares of
Series C Preferred Stock so that each share of Series C
Preferred Stock would be convertible into common stock on
approximately a one-to-one basis.
|
42 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
The Series C Preferred Stock is not redeemable by AIG and,
upon the effectiveness of the required amendments to AIGs
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, will be convertible into
common stock. From issuance, the Series C Preferred Stock
will, to the extent permitted by law, vote with the common stock
as a single class and represent approximately 77.9 percent
of the voting power of the common stock, treating the Series C
Preferred Stock as converted. The Series C Preferred Stock
will also participate in any dividends paid on the common stock,
with approximately 77.9 percent of all dividends paid
allocated to the Series C Preferred Stock, treating the
Series C Preferred Stock as converted. Upon the liquidation,
dissolution or winding up of AIG, the Series C Preferred
Stock is entitled to a liquidation preference per share equal to
the greater of (i) $5.00 and (ii) the amount that
would be payable with respect to the shares of common stock
issuable upon conversion of such share of Series C
Preferred Stock. For additional information about the
Series C Preferred Stock, see Note 15 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
March
2009 Agreements in Principle
On March 2, 2009, AIG, the NY Fed and the United States
Department of the Treasury announced agreements in principle to
modify the terms of the Fed Credit Agreement and the
Series D Preferred Stock and to provide a $30 billion
equity capital commitment facility. The United States Government
has issued the following statement referring to the agreements
in principle and other transactions they expect to undertake
with AIG intended to strengthen AIGs capital position,
enhance its liquidity, reduce its borrowing costs and facilitate
AIGs asset disposition program.
The steps announced today provide tangible evidence of the
U.S. governments commitment to the orderly
restructuring of AIG over time in the face of continuing market
dislocations and economic deterioration. Orderly restructuring
is essential to AIGs repayment of the support it has
received from U.S. taxpayers and to preserving financial
stability. The U.S. government is committed to continuing
to work with AIG to maintain its ability to meet its obligations
as they come due.
See Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Modification
to Series D Preferred Stock
On March 2, 2009, AIG and the United States Department of
the Treasury announced their agreement in principle to enter
into a transaction pursuant to which the United States
Department of the Treasury would modify the terms of the
Series D Preferred Stock. The modification will be effected
by an exchange of 100 percent of the outstanding shares of
Series D Preferred Stock for newly issued perpetual serial
preferred stock (Series E Preferred Stock), with a
liquidation preference equal to the issuance-date liquidation
preference of the Series D Preferred Stock surrendered plus
accumulated but unpaid dividends thereon. The terms of the
Series E Preferred Stock will be the same as for the
Series D Preferred Stock except that the dividends will not
be cumulative. The Series D Preferred Stock bore cumulative
dividends.
The dividend rate on both the cumulative Series D Preferred
Stock and the non-cumulative Series E Preferred Stock is
10 percent per annum. Concurrent with the exchange of the
shares of Series D Preferred Stock for the Series E
Preferred Stock, AIG will enter into a replacement capital
covenant in favor of the holders of a series of AIG debt,
pursuant to which AIG will agree that prior to the third
anniversary of the issuance of the Series E Preferred Stock
AIG will not repay, redeem or purchase, and no subsidiary of AIG
will purchase, all or any part of the Series E Preferred
Stock except with the proceeds obtained from the issuance by AIG
or any subsidiary of AIG of certain capital securities. AIG will
make a statement of intent substantially similar to the
replacement capital covenant with respect to subsequent years.
The Series D Preferred Stock was not subject to a
replacement capital covenant.
Equity
Capital Commitment Facility
On March 2, 2009, AIG and the United States Department of
the Treasury announced its agreement in principle to provide AIG
with a
5-year
equity capital commitment facility of $30 billion. AIG may
use the facility to sell to the United States Department of the
Treasury fixed-rate, non-cumulative perpetual serial preferred
stock
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 43
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
(Series F Preferred Stock). The facility will be available
to AIG so long as AIG is not the debtor in a pending case under
Title 11, United States Code, and the Trust (or any
successor entity established for the benefit of the United
States Treasury) beneficially owns more than 50
percent of the aggregate voting power of AIGs voting
securities at the time of such drawdown.
The terms of the Series F Preferred Stock will be
substantially similar to the Series E Preferred Stock,
except that the Series F Preferred Stock will not be
subject to a replacement capital covenant or the statement of
intent.
In connection with the equity capital commitment facility, the
United States Department of the Treasury will also receive
warrants exercisable for a number of shares of common stock of
AIG equal to 1 percent of AIGs then outstanding common
stock and, upon issuance of the warrants, the dividends payable
on, and the voting power of, the Series C Preferred Stock
will be reduced by the number of shares subject to the warrant.
Repayment
of Fed Facility with Subsidiary Preferred Equity
On March 2, 2009, AIG and the NY Fed announced their intent
to enter into a transaction pursuant to which AIG will transfer
to the NY Fed preferred equity interests in newly-formed special
purpose vehicles (SPVs). Each SPV will have (directly or
indirectly) as its only asset 100 percent of the common stock of
an AIG operating subsidiary (AIA in one case and ALICO in the
other). AIG expects to own the common interests of each SPV and
will initially have the right to appoint the entire board of
directors of each SPV. In exchange for the preferred equity
interests received by the NY Fed, there would be a concurrent
substantial reduction in the outstanding balance and maximum
available amount to be borrowed on the Fed Facility.
Securitizations
On March 2, 2009, AIG and the NY Fed announced their intent
to enter into a transaction pursuant to which AIG will issue to
the NY Fed senior certificates in one or more newly-formed SPVs
backed by inforce blocks of life insurance policies in
settlement of a portion of the outstanding balance of the Fed
Facility. The amount of the Fed Facility reduction will be based
on the proceeds received. The SPVs are expected to be
consolidated by AIG.
Modification
to Fed Facility
On March 2, 2009, AIG and the NY Fed announced their
agreement in principle to amend the Fed Credit Agreement to
remove the interest rate floor. Under the current terms,
interest accrues on the outstanding borrowings under the Fed
Facility at three-month LIBOR (no less than 3.5 percent) plus
3.0 percent per annum. The 3.5 percent LIBOR floor will be
eliminated following the amendment. In addition, the Fed
Facility will be amended to ensure that the total commitment
will be at least $25 billion, even after giving effect to
the repayment of the Fed Facility with subsidiary preferred
equity and securitization transactions described above. These
proceeds are expected to substantially reduce the outstanding
borrowings under the Fed Facility from the amount outstanding as
of December 31, 2008.
Liquidity
Position
At December 31, 2008, AIG had outstanding borrowings under
the Fed Facility of $36.8 billion, with a remaining
borrowing capacity of $23.2 billion, and accrued
compounding interest and fees totaled $3.6 billion.
44 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Borrowings outstanding and remaining available amount that
can be borrowed under the Fed Facility were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inception through
|
|
|
Inception through
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
February 18,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009(c)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans to AIGFP for collateral postings, GIA and other debt
maturities
|
|
$
|
46,997
|
|
|
$
|
47,547
|
|
Capital contributions to insurance companies(a)
|
|
|
20,850
|
|
|
|
20,850
|
|
Repayment of obligations to securities lending program
|
|
|
3,160
|
|
|
|
3,160
|
|
Repayment of intercompany loans
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
Contributions to AIGCFG subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,672
|
|
|
|
1,686
|
|
Debt repayments
|
|
|
2,109
|
|
|
|
2,319
|
|
Funding of equity interest in ML III
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Repayment from the proceeds of the issuance of Series D
Preferred Stock and common stock warrant
|
|
|
(40,000
|
)
|
|
|
(40,000
|
)
|
Other(a)(b)
|
|
|
(4,516
|
)
|
|
|
(6,890
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings
|
|
|
36,800
|
|
|
|
35,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Fed Facility
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
60,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining available amount
|
|
$
|
23,200
|
|
|
$
|
24,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net borrowings
|
|
$
|
36,800
|
|
|
$
|
35,200
|
|
Accrued compounding interest and fees
|
|
|
3,631
|
|
|
|
3,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total balance outstanding
|
|
$
|
40,431
|
|
|
$
|
38,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes securities lending activities. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Includes repayments from funds received from the Fed
Securities Lending Agreement and the CPFF. |
|
(c) |
|
At February 25, 2009, $36 billion was outstanding
under the Fed Facility. |
AIGs
Strategy for Stabilization and Repayment of AIGs
Obligations as They Come Due
Future
Cash Requirements
The following table shows the maturing debt of AIG and its
subsidiaries for each quarter of 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
Fourth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
AIG
|
|
$
|
418
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,418
|
|
AIG MIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,156
|
|
AIGFP
|
|
|
1,421
|
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
2,132
|
|
|
|
1,125
|
|
|
|
5,443
|
|
ILFC
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
1,097
|
|
|
|
1,151
|
|
|
|
2,986
|
|
|
|
6,151
|
|
AGF
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
931
|
|
|
|
3,209
|
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
6,636
|
|
Other subsidiaries
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,903
|
|
|
$
|
4,176
|
|
|
$
|
6,606
|
|
|
$
|
6,896
|
|
|
$
|
21,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, at February 18, 2009, AIG affiliates had
issued $14 billion in commercial paper to the CPFF with the
majority of maturities in April of 2009. If AIGs
short-term ratings are downgraded, AIG Funding may lose access
to the CPFF and would be required to find other sources to fund
the maturing commercial paper.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 45
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
AIG expects to meet these obligations primarily through
borrowings from the Fed Facility and the cash flows, including
from dispositions, of assets supporting these obligations.
Approximately $3.1 billion of AIGFPs debt maturities
through December 31, 2009 are fully collateralized with
assets backing the corresponding liabilities. It is expected
that AGF and ILFC will require support from AIG, in addition to
their cash flows from operations and proceeds from asset sales
and securitizations, to meet their 2009 obligations. See
Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information regarding the terms of the Fed Credit
Agreement and the related Pledge Agreement.
In 2009, AIG made capital contributions of $1.25 billion to
certain of its Domestic Life Insurance & Retirement
Services companies. If a substantial portion of the Domestic
Life Insurance & Retirement Services bond portfolio
diminishes significantly in value or suffers credit events, AIG
may need to provide additional capital support for these
operations.
AIG has developed certain plans (described below), some of which
have already been implemented, to provide stability to its
businesses and to provide for the timely repayment of the Fed
Facility; other plans are still being formulated.
Asset
Disposition Plan
On October 3, 2008, AIG announced a restructuring plan
under which AIGs Life Insurance & Retirement
Services operations and certain other businesses would be
divested in whole or in part. Since that time, AIG has sold
certain businesses and assets and has entered into contracts to
sell others. However, global market conditions have continued to
deteriorate, posing risks to AIGs ability to divest assets
at acceptable values. As announced on March 2, 2009 and as
described in Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, AIGs restructuring plan has evolved in
response to these market conditions. Specifically, AIGs
current plans involve transactions between AIG and the NY Fed
with respect to AIA and ALICO, as well as plans to retain the
majority of AIGs U.S. property and casualty and
foreign general insurance businesses.
AIG believes that these current plans are necessary to maximize
the value of its businesses over a longer time frame. Therefore,
some businesses that have previously been prepared for sale will
be divested, some will be held for later divestiture, and some
businesses will be prepared for potential subsequent offerings
to the public. Dispositions of certain businesses will be
subject to regulatory approval. Proceeds from these
dispositions, to the extent they do not represent required
capital of AIGs insurance company subsidiaries, are
contractually required to be applied toward the repayment of the
Fed Facility as mandatory repayments.
In connection with AIGs asset disposition plan, through
February 18, 2009, AIG had sold, or entered into contracts
to sell the following operations:
|
|
|
|
|
On November 26, 2008, AIG sold its 50 percent stake in
the Brazilian joint venture Unibanco AIG Seguros S.A. to
AIGs JV partner Unibanco-União de Bancos Brasileiros
S.A.
|
|
|
|
On December 1, 2008, AIG entered into a contract to sell
AIG Private Bank Ltd. to Aabar Investments PJSC.
|
|
|
|
On December 18, 2008, AIG sold the assets of its Taiwan
Finance business to Taiwan Acceptance Corporation.
|
|
|
|
On December 19, 2008, AIG entered into a contract to sell
Deutsche Versicherungs-und
Rückversicherungs-Aktiengesellschaft (Darag), a German
general insurance subsidiary of AIG affiliate
Württembergische und Badische Versicherungs-AG(WüBa)
in Germany, to Augur.
|
|
|
|
On December 22, 2008, AIG entered into a contract to sell
HSB Group, Inc., the parent company of HSB, to Munich Re Group.
|
|
|
|
On January 13, 2009, AIG entered into a contract to sell
AIG Life Insurance Company of Canada to BMO Financial Group.
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 46
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
On January 23, 2009, AIG entered into a contract to sell
AIG PhilAm Savings Bank, PhilAm Auto Financing and Leasing, and
PFL Holdings to EastWest Banking Corporation.
|
|
|
|
On February 5, 2009, AIG entered into a contract to sell
AIG Retail Bank Public Company Limited and AIG Card (Thailand)
to Bank of Ayudhya.
|
Subject to satisfaction of certain closing conditions, including
regulatory approvals, AIG expects those sales that are under
contract to close during the first half of 2009. These
operations had total assets and liabilities with carrying values
of approximately $14.1 billion and $12.6 billion,
respectively, at December 31, 2008. Aggregate proceeds from
the sale of these businesses, including repayment of
intercompany loan facilities, are expected to be
$2.8 billion. These eight transactions are expected to
generate $2.1 billion of net cash proceeds to repay
outstanding borrowings on the Fed Facility, after taking
insurance affiliate capital requirements into account.
AIG expects to divest its Institutional Asset Management
businesses that manage third-party assets. These businesses
offered for sale exclude those providing traditional fixed
income and shorter duration asset and liability management for
AIGs insurance company subsidiaries. The extraction of
these asset management businesses will require the establishment
of shared service arrangements between the remaining asset
management businesses and those that are sold as well as the
establishment of new asset management contracts, which will be
determined in conjunction with the buyers of these businesses.
AIGFP is engaged in a multi-step process of unwinding its
businesses and portfolios. In connection with that process,
certain assets have been sold, or are under contract to be sold.
The proceeds from these sales will be used for AIGFPs
liquidity and are not included in the amounts above. The NY Fed
has waived the requirement under the Fed Credit Agreement that
the proceeds of these sales be applied as a mandatory repayment
under the Fed Facility, which would result in a permanent
reduction of the NY Feds commitment to lend to AIG.
Instead, the NY Fed has given AIGFP permission to retain the
proceeds of the completed sales, and has required that the
proceeds of pending sales be used to voluntarily repay the Fed
Facility, with the amounts repaid available for future
reborrowing subject to the terms of the Fed Facility. AIGFP is
also opportunistically terminating contracts. AIGFP is entering
into new derivative transactions only to hedge its current
portfolio, reduce risk and hedge the currency, interest rate and
other market risks associated with its affiliated businesses.
Due to the long-term duration of AIGFPs derivative
contracts and the complexity of AIGFPs portfolio, AIG
expects that an orderly wind-down will take a substantial period
of time. The cost of executing the wind-down will depend on many
factors, many of which are not within AIGFPs control,
including market conditions, AIGFPs access to markets via
market counterparties, the availability of liquidity and the
potential implications of further rating downgrades.
AIG continually evaluates overall market conditions, performance
of businesses that are for sale, and market and business
performance of competitors and likely bidders for the assets.
This evaluation informs decision-making about the timing and
process of putting businesses up for sale. Depending on market
and business conditions, as noted above, AIG can modify its
sales approach to maximize value for AIG and the
U.S. taxpayers in the disposition process. Such a
modification could result in the sale of additional or other
assets.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets (FAS 144) requires that certain criteria be
met in order for AIG to classify a business as held for sale. At
December 31, 2008, the held for sale criteria in
FAS 144 was not met for AIGs significant businesses
included in its asset disposition plan.
Expense
Reductions and Preservation of Cash and Capital
AIG developed a plan to review significant projects and
eliminated, delayed, or curtailed those that are discretionary
or non-essential to make available internal resources and to
improve liquidity by reducing cash outflows to outside service
providers. AIG also suspended the dividend on its common stock
to preserve capital.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 47
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Liquidity
of Parent and Subsidiaries
AIG
(Parent Company)
At February 18, 2009, AIG parent had the following sources
of liquidity:
|
|
|
|
|
$24.8 billion of available borrowings under the Fed
Facility;
|
|
|
|
$753 million of available commercial paper borrowings under
the CPFF; and
|
|
|
|
$1.1 billion of cash and short-term investments.
|
These sources of liquidity will be supplemented when the
liquidity arrangements expected to be entered into among AIG,
the NY Fed and the United States Department of the Treasury are
implemented. As a result, AIG believes that it has sufficient
liquidity at the parent level to meet its obligations through at
least the next twelve months. However, no assurance can be
given that AIGs cash needs will not exceed projected
amounts. Additional collateral calls at AIGFP, a further
downgrade of AIGs credit ratings or unexpected capital or
liquidity needs of AIGs subsidiaries may result in
significant additional cash needs. For a further discussion of
this risk, see Item 1A. Risk Factors.
Since the fourth quarter of 2008, AIG has not had access to its
traditional sources of long-term or short-term financing through
the public debt markets. Further, in light of AIGs current
common stock price, AIG does not expect to be able to issue
equity securities in the public markets in the foreseeable
future.
Traditionally AIG depended on dividends, distributions, and
other payments from subsidiaries to fund payments on its
obligations. In light of AIGs current financial situation,
many of its regulated subsidiaries are restricted from making
dividend payments, or advancing funds, to AIG (see Item 1A.
Risk Factors). Primary uses of cash flow are for debt service
and subsidiary funding. In 2008, AIG parent collected
$2.7 billion in dividends and other payments from
subsidiaries (primarily from insurance company subsidiaries),
issued $12.8 billion of debt and retired $3.2 billion
of debt, excluding MIP and Series AIGFP debt. Excluding MIP
and Series AIGFP debt, AIG parent made interest payments
totaling $1.5 billion, and made $27.2 billion in net
capital contributions to subsidiaries. AIG paid
$1.7 billion in dividends to shareholders in 2008, prior to
the suspension of dividends in September 2008.
AIG parent funds a portion of its short-term working capital
needs through commercial paper issued by AIG Funding. Since
October 2008, all commercial paper issuance for AIG Funding has
been through the CPFF program. As of December 31, 2008, AIG
Funding had $6.9 billion of commercial paper outstanding
with an average maturity of 32 days, of which
$6.6 billion was issued through the CPFF.
AIGs liquidity could also be further impaired by
unforeseen significant outflows of cash. This situation may
arise due to circumstances that AIG may be unable to control,
such as more extensive general market disruption or an
operational problem that affects third parties or AIG.
Regulatory and other legal restrictions would likely limit
AIGs ability to transfer funds freely, either to or from
its subsidiaries. For a further discussion of the regulatory
environment in which AIG subsidiaries operate and other issues
affecting AIGs liquidity, see Item 1A. Risk Factors.
General
Insurance
AIG currently expects that its general insurance subsidiaries
will be able to continue to meet their obligations as they come
due through cash from operations and, to the extent necessary,
asset dispositions. One or more large catastrophes, however, may
require AIG to provide additional support to the affected
general insurance operations. In addition, further downgrades in
AIGs credit ratings could put pressure on the insurer
financial strength ratings of these subsidiaries. A downgrade in
the insurer financial strength ratings of an insurance company
subsidiary could result in non-renewals or cancellations by
policyholders and adversely affect these companies ability
to meet their own obligations and require that AIG provide
capital or liquidity support to them. For a discussion of
AIGs potential inability to support its subsidiaries, see
Item 1A. Risk Factors Liquidity.
48 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
General Insurance operating cash flow is derived from
underwriting and investment activities. Cash flow from
underwriting operations includes collections of periodic
premiums and paid loss recoveries, less reinsurance premiums,
losses, and acquisition and operating expenses. Generally, there
is a time lag from when premiums are collected and losses and
benefits are paid. Investment cash flow is primarily derived
from interest and dividends received, and includes investment
maturities and repayments.
With respect to General Insurance operations, if paid losses
accelerated beyond AIGs ability to fund such losses from
current operating cash flows, AIG might need to liquidate a
portion of its General Insurance investment portfolio
and/or
attempt to arrange for financing. A liquidity strain could
result from the occurrence of one or several significant
catastrophic events in a relatively short period of time.
Additional strain on liquidity could occur if the investments
liquidated to fund such paid losses were sold in a depressed
market place. Further liquidity strains could also arise if
reinsurance recoverable on such paid losses became uncollectible
or collateral supporting such reinsurance recoverable
significantly decreased in value.
At December 31, 2008, General Insurance had liquidity in
the form of cash and short-term investments of $11.7 billion. In
the event additional liquidity is required, management believes
it can provide such liquidity through sale of a portion of its
substantial holdings in government and corporate bonds as well
as equity securities. Government and corporate bonds represented
97.6 percent of total fixed income investments at
December 31, 2008. Given the size and liquidity profile of
AIGs General Insurance investment portfolios, AIG believes
that deviations from its projected claim experience do not
constitute a significant liquidity risk. AIGs
asset/liability management process takes into account the
expected maturity of investments and the specific nature and
risk profile of liabilities. Historically, there has been no
significant variation between the expected maturities of
AIGs General Insurance investments and the payment of
claims.
AIG has arranged for letters of credit that totaled
$1.6 billion and funded trusts totaling $2.9 billion
at December 31, 2008, to allow certain AIG Property and
Casualty Group subsidiaries to obtain admitted surplus credit
for reinsurance provided by non-admitted carriers. Substantially
all the letters of credit may be cancelled on December 31,
2010. The inability of AIG to renew or replace these letters of
credit or otherwise obtain equivalent financial support would
result in a reduction of the statutory surplus of these property
and casualty companies. AIG Property Casualty Group maintains
liquidity in its investment portfolio through holdings of
$6.2 billion of municipal securities which have been
refunded and are escrowed to the call or to maturity. The
maturities of these holdings are all less than ten years, and
the bonds are secured by the United States Department of the
Treasury or Government Agency securities held in escrow by
trustees. These municipal holdings have substantial unrealized
gains and demonstrated liquidity even during the market
dislocations experienced during the fourth quarter of 2008.
Life
Insurance & Retirement Services
Life Insurance & Retirement Services operating cash
flow is derived from underwriting and investment activities.
Cash flow from underwriting operations includes collections of
periodic premiums and policyholders contract deposits, and
paid loss recoveries, less reinsurance premiums, losses,
benefits, surrenders, and acquisition and operating expenses.
Generally, there is a time lag from when premiums are collected
and losses and benefits are paid. Investment cash flow is
primarily derived from interest and dividends received, and
includes investment maturities and repayments. Contributions
from AIG parent also represent a liquidity source.
If a substantial portion of the Life Insurance &
Retirement Services operations bond portfolio diminished
significantly in value
and/or
defaulted, AIG might need to provide capital or liquidity
support to these operations. For a discussion of AIGs
potential inability to support its subsidiaries, see
Item 1A. Risk Factors Liquidity. A significant
increase in policy surrenders and withdrawals, which could be
triggered by a variety of factors, including AIG-specific
concerns, could result in a substantial liquidity strain. Other
potential events causing a liquidity strain could include
economic collapse of a nation or region in which Life
Insurance & Retirement Services operations exist,
nationalization, catastrophic terrorist acts, or other economic
or political upheaval.
At December 31, 2008, Life Insurance & Retirement
Services had liquidity in the form of cash and short-term
investments of $32.3 billion. In the event additional
liquidity is required, management believes it can provide such
liquidity through sale of a portion of its substantial holdings
in government and corporate bonds as well as equity
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 49
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
securities. Government and corporate bonds represented 84.8
percent of total fixed income investments at December 31,
2008. Given the size and liquidity profile of AIGs Life
Insurance & Retirement Services investment portfolios, AIG
believes that deviations from its projected claim experience do
not constitute a significant liquidity risk. AIGs
asset/liability management process takes into account the
expected maturity of investments and expected benefit payments
and policy surrenders as well as the specific nature and risk
profile of these liabilities. The Life Insurance &
Retirement Services subsidiaries have been able to meet
liquidity needs, even during the period of higher surrenders
which was experienced from mid-September through year-end 2008,
and expect to be able to do so in the foreseeable future.
Foreign
Life Insurance Companies
AIGs Foreign Life Insurance companies (including ALICO)
have had significant capital needs following publicity of AIG
parents liquidity issues and related credit ratings
downgrades and reflecting the decline in the equity markets. AIG
contributed $4.4 billion to the Foreign Life Insurance
companies during 2008 ($4.0 billion of which was
contributed using borrowings under the Fed Facility). In Taiwan,
AIG contributed approximately $1.8 billion to Nan Shan in
2008 as a result of the continued declines in the Taiwan equity
market and foreign currency movements. AIG made capital
contributions of $2.6 billion to support foreign life
operations in Hong Kong and Japan, principally due to the steep
decline in AIGs common stock price.
AIG believes that its Foreign Life Insurance subsidiaries have
adequate capital to support their business plans through 2009;
however, to the extent the investment portfolios of the Foreign
Life Insurance companies continue to be adversely affected by
market conditions, AIG may need to make additional capital
contributions to these companies. For a discussion of AIGs
potential inability to support its subsidiaries, see
Item 1A. Risk Factors Liquidity.
Domestic
Life Insurance and Domestic Retirement Services
Companies
AIGs Domestic Life Insurance and Domestic Retirement
Services companies have two primary liquidity needs: the funding
of surrenders, and obtaining capital to offset statutory
other-than-temporary impairment charges. At the current rate of
surrenders, AIG believes that its Domestic Life Insurance and
Domestic Retirement Services companies will have sufficient
resources to meet these obligations. A substantial increase in
surrender activity could, however, place stress on the liquidity
of these companies and require asset sales or contributions from
AIG.
During the year ended December 31, 2008 and through
February 27, 2009, AIG contributed capital totaling
$22.7 billion ($18.0 billion of which was contributed
using borrowings under the Fed Facility) to certain of its
Domestic Life Insurance and Domestic Retirement Services
subsidiaries to replace a portion of the capital lost as a
result of net realized capital losses (primarily resulting from
other-than-temporary impairment charges). Further capital
contributions may be required to the extent additional statutory
net realized capital losses are incurred. For a discussion of
AIGs potential inability to support its subsidiaries, see
Item 1A. Risk Factors Liquidity.
Financial
Services
AIGs major Financial Services operating subsidiaries
consist of ILFC, AIGFP, AGF and AIGCFG. Traditional sources of
funds considered in meeting the liquidity needs of these
operations are generally no longer available. These sources
included GIAs issuance of long- and short-term debt,
issuance of commercial paper, bank loans and bank credit
facilities. However, AIGCFG has been able to retain a
significant portion of customer deposits, providing a measure of
liquidity.
ILFC
ILFCs traditional source of liquidity had been collections
of lease payments and borrowing in the public debt markets to
fund aircraft purchases and to satisfy maturing debt. Additional
liquidity is provided by the proceeds of aircraft sales.
50 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
In September 2008, ILFC was unable to borrow in the public debt
markets, and therefore, ILFC borrowed the full $6.5 billion
amount available under its credit facilities. ILFC was also
accepted into the CPFF and had borrowed approximately
$1.7 billion under the CPFF as of December 31, 2008.
On January 21, 2009, however, S&P downgraded
ILFCs short-term credit rating and, as a result, ILFC lost
access to the CPFF. The $1.7 billion ILFC had borrowed
under the CPFF was due and paid on January 28, 2009. ILFC
is currently seeking secured financing. ILFC has the capacity
under its present facilities and indentures, to enter into
secured financings in excess of $5.0 billion. If ILFC
continues to be limited in its ability to use this capacity, AIG
expects that these borrowings and cash flows from operations,
which may include aircraft sales, will be inadequate to permit
ILFC to meet its obligations for 2009. Therefore, AIG will need
to provide support through additional asset sales or funding for
the remaining amounts.
As a result of Moodys downgrade of ILFCs long-term
debt rating, ILFC received notice under the provisions of the
Export Credit Facilities to segregate security deposits and
maintenance reserves related to aircraft funded under the
facilities into separate accounts. ILFC had 90 days from
the date of the notice to comply and, subsequent to
December 31, 2008, ILFC segregated approximately
$260 million of deposits and maintenance reserves. The
amount of funds required to be segregated under the facility
agreements fluctuates with the changes in the related deposits,
maintenance reserves, and debt maturities. Further rating
downgrades would impose additional restrictions under these
facilities including the requirement to segregate rental
payments and would require prior consent to withdraw funds from
the segregated account.
AIGFP
AIGFP had historically funded its operations through the
issuance of notes and bonds, GIA borrowings and other structured
financing transactions. AIGFP also obtained funding through
repurchase agreements.
In the last half of 2008, AIGFPs access to its traditional
sources of liquidity were significantly reduced and it relied on
AIG Parent to meet most of its liquidity needs. AIGFPs
asset backed commercial paper conduit, Curzon Funding LLC, was
accepted into the CPFF with a total borrowing limit of
$7.2 billion, and had approximately $6.8 billion
outstanding at February 18, 2009. Separately, a structured
investment vehicle sponsored, but not consolidated, by AIGFP,
Nightingale Finance LLC, was also accepted into the CPFF with a
borrowing limit of $1.1 billion. As of February 18,
2009, this vehicle had approximately $1.1 billion
outstanding under the CPFF.
AGF
AGFs traditional source of liquidity has been collections
of customer receivables and borrowing in the public markets.
In September 2008, AGF was unable to borrow in the public debt
markets and drew down $4.6 billion, the full amount
available, under its primary credit facilities. AGF anticipates
that its primary source of funds to support its operations and
repay its obligations will be customer receivable collections.
In order to improve cash flow, AGF will limit its lending
activities and manage its expenses. In addition, AGF is pursuing
sales of certain of its finance receivables and seeking
securitization financing. AIG expects that AGFs existing
sources of funds will be inadequate to meet its debt and other
obligations for 2009. Therefore, AIG will need to provide
support through additional asset sales or funding for the
remaining amounts.
AIGCFG
AIGCFG experienced significant deposit withdrawals in Hong Kong
during September 2008. AIGCFG subsidiaries borrowed
$1.6 billion from AIG in September and October of 2008 to
meet these withdrawals and other cash needs. No further material
funding was required during the remainder of the fourth quarter
of 2008.
Since November of 2008, AIGCFG subsidiaries have been able to
retain significant deposit balances as a result of the lowered
perceived risk, as well as depository insurance support provided
by various regulatory authorities in countries in which AIGCFG
units operate.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 51
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
AIG believes that the funding needs of AIGCFG have stabilized,
but it is possible that renewed customer and counterparty
concerns could substantially increase AIGCFGs liquidity
needs in 2009. Through February 18, 2009, AIGCFG had
entered into contracts to sell certain of its operations in
Taiwan, Thailand and the Philippines.
Asset
Management
Asset Managements principal cash requirements are to fund
general working capital needs, investment commitments related to
proprietary investments originally acquired for warehouse
purposes, contractual capital commitments, proprietary
investments of AIG Global Real Estate and any liquidity
mismatches in the Spread-Based Investment business. Requirements
related to Institutional Asset Management are funded through
general operating cash flows from management and performance
fees, proceeds from events in underlying funds (capital calls to
third parties, sale of portfolio companies, etc.) as well as
intercompany funding provided by AIG. Accordingly, Institutional
Asset Managements ability to fund certain of its needs may
depend on advances from AIG under various intercompany borrowing
facilities. Restrictions on these facilities would have adverse
consequences on the ability of the business to satisfy its
respective obligations. With respect to the Global Real Estate
business, investing activities are also funded through
third-party financing arrangements which are secured by the
relevant properties.
The GIC and MIP programs are in run-off. AIG expects to fund its
obligations under these programs through cash flows generated
from invested assets (principal and interest) as well as sales
of investments, primarily fixed maturity securities. However,
illiquidity and diminished values within the investment
portfolios may impair AIGs ability to sell the related
program assets or sell such assets for a price adequate to
settle the corresponding liabilities when they come due. In such
a case, AIG parent would need to fund the payments.
52 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Debt
Total debt was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Debt issued by AIG:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fed Facility (secured)
|
|
$
|
40,431
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
11,756
|
|
|
|
14,588
|
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
11,685
|
|
|
|
5,809
|
|
Junior subordinated debt attributable to equity units
|
|
|
5,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans and mortgages payable
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
729
|
|
MIP matched notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
14,446
|
|
|
|
14,267
|
|
AIGFP matched notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
4,660
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total AIG debt
|
|
|
89,274
|
|
|
|
36,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt guaranteed by AIG:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIGFP(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper(b)
|
|
|
6,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
GIAs
|
|
|
13,860
|
|
|
|
19,908
|
|
Notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
5,250
|
|
|
|
36,676
|
|
Loans and mortgages payable
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
|
|
1,384
|
|
Hybrid financial instrument liabilities(c)
|
|
|
2,113
|
|
|
|
7,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total AIGFP debt
|
|
|
30,200
|
|
|
|
65,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG Funding commercial paper(b)
|
|
|
6,856
|
|
|
|
4,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIGLH notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities connected to trust preferred stock
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt issued or guaranteed by AIG
|
|
|
128,543
|
|
|
|
108,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt not guaranteed by AIG:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ILFC
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper(b)
|
|
|
1,748
|
|
|
|
4,483
|
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
Notes and bonds payable(d)
|
|
|
30,047
|
|
|
|
25,737
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ILFC debt
|
|
|
32,794
|
|
|
|
31,219
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AGF
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper and extendible commercial notes
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
3,801
|
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
Notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
23,089
|
|
|
|
22,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total AGF debt
|
|
|
23,626
|
|
|
|
26,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIGCFG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
Loans and mortgages payable
|
|
|
1,596
|
|
|
|
1,839
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total AIGCFG debt
|
|
|
1,720
|
|
|
|
2,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other subsidiaries
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt of consolidated investments held through:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 53
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
A.I. Credit(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
AIG Investments
|
|
|
1,300
|
|
|
|
1,636
|
|
AIG Global Real Estate
|
|
|
4,545
|
|
|
|
5,096
|
|
AIG SunAmerica
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
ALICO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt of consolidated investments
|
|
|
5,850
|
|
|
|
7,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt not guaranteed by AIG
|
|
|
64,660
|
|
|
|
67,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial paper and extendible commercial notes
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
13,114
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank of New York commercial paper funding
facility
|
|
|
15,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term debt
|
|
|
177,485
|
|
|
|
162,935
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
193,203
|
|
|
$
|
176,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In 2008, AIGFP borrowings are carried at fair value. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes borrowings of $6.8 billion, $6.6 billion
and $1.7 billion for AIGFP (through Curzon Funding LLC,
AIGFPs asset-backed commercial paper conduit), AIG Funding
and ILFC, respectively, under the CPFF at December 31,
2008. |
|
(c) |
|
Represents structured notes issued by AIGFP that are
accounted at fair value. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes borrowings under Export Credit Facility of
$2.4 billion and $2.5 billion at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. |
|
(e) |
|
Represents commercial paper issued by a variable interest
entity secured by receivables of A.I. Credit. |
54 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Long-Term
Debt
A roll forward of long-term debt, excluding debt of
consolidated investments is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for the year ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities
|
|
|
Effect of
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Non-Cash
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Issuances
|
|
|
Repayments
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
Changes(b)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
AIG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fed Facility
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
96,650
|
|
|
$
|
(59,850
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,631
|
|
|
$
|
40,431
|
|
Notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
14,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,700
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
11,756
|
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
5,809
|
|
|
|
6,953
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,078
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
11,685
|
|
Junior subordinated debt attributable to equity units
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,880
|
|
Loans and mortgages payable
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
(762
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
416
|
|
MIP matched notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
14,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
14,446
|
|
AIGFP matched notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
|
3,464
|
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
4,660
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIGFP(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GIAs
|
|
|
19,908
|
|
|
|
5,070
|
|
|
|
(16,576
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,458
|
|
|
|
13,860
|
|
Notes and bonds payable and hybrid financial instrument
liabilities
|
|
|
44,155
|
|
|
|
63,803
|
|
|
|
(99,531
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,064
|
)
|
|
|
7,363
|
|
Loans and mortgages payable
|
|
|
1,384
|
|
|
|
9,254
|
|
|
|
(8,512
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIGLH notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
797
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
798
|
|
Liabilities connected to trust preferred stock
|
|
|
1,435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
ILFC notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
25,737
|
|
|
|
9,389
|
|
|
|
(4,575
|
)
|
|
|
(507
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
30,047
|
|
ILFC junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
AGF notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
22,369
|
|
|
|
5,844
|
|
|
|
(4,659
|
)
|
|
|
(427
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
23,089
|
|
AGF junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
AIGCFG loans and mortgages payable
|
|
|
1,839
|
|
|
|
2,278
|
|
|
|
(2,431
|
)
|
|
|
(214
|
)
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
|
1,596
|
|
Other subsidiaries
|
|
|
775
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(165
|
)
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
156,014
|
|
|
$
|
209,065
|
|
|
$
|
(200,172
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,231
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,959
|
|
|
$
|
171,635
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In 2008, AIGFP borrowings are carried at fair value. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes the change in fair value and cumulative effect of
the adoption of FAS 159, The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities (FAS 159).
Also includes commitment fee and accrued compounding interest of
$3.63 billion on the Fed Facility. |
AIG
(Parent Company)
AIG traditionally issued debt securities from time to time to
meet its financing needs and those of certain of its
subsidiaries, as well as to opportunistically fund the MIP. The
maturities of the debt securities issued by AIG to fund the MIP
are generally expected to be paid using the cash flows of assets
held by AIG as part of the MIP portfolio. However, mismatches in
the timing of cash inflows and outflows of the MIP, as well as
shortfalls due to impairments of MIP assets, would need to be
funded by AIG parent.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 55
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
On August 18, 2008, AIG sold $3.25 billion principal
amount of senior unsecured notes in a
Rule 144A/Regulation S offering which bear interest at
a per annum rate of 8.25 percent and mature in 2018. The
proceeds from the sale of these notes were used by AIGFP for its
general corporate purposes, and the notes are included within
AIGFP matched notes and bonds payable in the
preceding tables. AIG has agreed to use commercially reasonable
efforts to consummate an exchange offer for the notes pursuant
to an effective registration statement within 360 days of
the date on which the notes were issued.
As of December 31, 2008, approximately $7.5 billion
principal amount of senior notes were outstanding under
AIGs medium-term note program, of which $3.2 billion
was used for AIGs general corporate purposes,
$893 million was used by AIGFP (included within AIGFP
matched notes bonds and payable in the preceding tables)
and $3.4 billion was used to fund the MIP. The maturity
dates of these notes range from 2009 to 2052. To the extent
considered appropriate, AIG may enter into swap transactions to
manage its effective borrowing rates with respect to these notes.
As of December 31, 2008, the equivalent of
$12.0 billion of notes were outstanding under AIGs
Euro medium-term note program, of which $9.7 billion were
used to fund the MIP and the remainder was used for AIGs
general corporate purposes. The aggregate amount outstanding
includes a $588 million loss resulting from foreign
exchange translation into U.S. dollars, of which
$0.1 million gain relates to notes issued by AIG for
general corporate purposes and $588 million loss relates to
notes issued to fund the MIP. AIG has economically hedged the
currency exposure arising from its foreign currency denominated
notes.
In May 2008, AIG raised a total of approximately
$20 billion through the sale of
(i) 196,710,525 shares of AIG common stock in a public
offering at a price per share of $38;
(ii) 78.4 million Equity Units in a public offering at
a price per unit of $75; and (iii) $6.9 billion in
unregistered offerings of junior subordinated debentures in
three series. The Equity Units and junior subordinated
debentures receive hybrid equity treatment from the major rating
agencies under their current policies but are recorded as
long-term debt on the consolidated balance sheet. The Equity
Units consist of an ownership interest in AIG junior
subordinated debentures and a stock purchase contract obligating
the holder of an equity unit to purchase, and obligating AIG to
sell, a variable number of shares of AIG common stock on three
dates in 2011 (a minimum of 128,944,480 shares and a
maximum of 154,738,080 shares, subject to anti-dilution
adjustments).
During 2007 and 2008, AIG issued an aggregate of $12.5 billion
of junior subordinated debentures in U.S. dollars, British
Pounds and Euros in eight series. In connection with each series
of junior subordinated debentures, AIG entered into a
Replacement Capital Covenant (RCC) for the benefit of the
holders of AIGs 6.25 percent senior notes due 2036.
The RCCs provide that AIG will not repay, redeem, or purchase
the applicable series of junior subordinated debentures on or
before a specified date, unless AIG has received qualifying
proceeds from the sale of the replacement capital securities.
In October 2007, AIG borrowed a total of $500 million on an
unsecured basis pursuant to a loan agreement with a third-party
bank. The entire amount of the loan was repaid on
September 30, 2008.
AIGFP
Approximately $3.1 billion of AIGFPs debt maturities
through December 31, 2009 are fully collateralized with
assets backing the corresponding liabilities. However,
mismatches in the timing of cash inflows on the assets and
outflows with respect to the liabilities may require assets to
be sold to satisfy maturing liabilities. Depending on market
conditions and AIGFPs ability to sell assets at that time,
proceeds from sales may not be sufficient to satisfy the full
amount due on maturing liabilities. Any shortfalls would need to
be funded by AIG parent.
ILFC
ILFC has a $4.3 billion Export Credit Facility for use in
connection with the purchase of approximately 75 aircraft
delivered through 2001. This facility was guaranteed by various
European Export Credit Agencies. The interest rate varies from
5.75 percent to 5.86 percent on these amortizing
ten-year borrowings depending on the delivery date of the
aircraft. At December 31, 2008, ILFC had $365 million
outstanding under this facility. The debt is collateralized by a
pledge of the shares of a subsidiary of ILFC, which holds title
to the aircraft financed under the facility.
56 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
ILFC has a similarly structured Export Credit Facility for up to
a maximum of $3.6 billion for Airbus aircraft to be
delivered through May 31, 2009. The facility becomes
available as the various European Export Credit Agencies provide
their guarantees for aircraft based on a forward-looking
calendar, and the interest rate is determined through a bid
process. The interest rates are either LIBOR based with spreads
ranging from (0.04) percent to 0.90 percent or at fixed
rates ranging from 4.2 percent to 4.7 percent. At
December 31, 2008, ILFC had $2.1 billion outstanding
under this facility. At December 31, 2008, the interest
rate of the loans outstanding ranged from 2.51 percent to
4.71 percent. The debt is collateralized by a pledge of
shares of a subsidiary of ILFC, which holds title to the
aircraft financed under the facility. Borrowings with respect to
these facilities are included in ILFCs notes and bonds
payable in the preceding table of borrowings.
At December 31, 2008, the total funded amount of
ILFCs bank financings was $7.6 billion. The fundings
mature through February 2012. The interest rates are
LIBOR-based, with spreads ranging from 0.30 percent to
1.625 percent. At December 31, 2008, the interest
rates ranged from 2.15 percent to 4.36 percent. AIG
does not guarantee any of the debt obligations of ILFC.
AGF
As of December 31, 2008, notes and bonds aggregating
$23.1 billion were outstanding with maturity dates ranging
from 2009 to 2031 at interest rates ranging from
0.23 percent to 9 percent. To the extent considered
appropriate, AGF may enter into swap transactions to manage its
effective borrowing rates with respect to these notes and bonds.
AIG does not guarantee any of the debt obligations of AGF but
has provided a capital support agreement for the benefit of
AGFs lenders under the AGF
364-Day
Syndicated Facility. Under this support agreement, AIG has
agreed to cause AGF to maintain (1) consolidated net worth
of $2.2 billion and (2) an adjusted tangible leverage
ratio of less than or equal to 8 to 1 at the end of each fiscal
quarter.
Revolving
Credit Facilities
AIG, ILFC and AGF maintain committed, unsecured revolving credit
facilities listed on the table below in order to support their
respective commercial paper programs and for general corporate
purposes. Some of the facilities, as noted below, contain a
term-out option allowing for the conversion by the
borrower of any outstanding loans at expiration into one-year
term loans.
Both ILFC and AGF have drawn the full amount available under
their revolving credit facilities. AIGs syndicated
facilities contain a covenant requiring AIG to maintain total
shareholders equity (calculated on a consolidated basis
consistent with GAAP) of at least $50 billion at all times.
If AIG fails to maintain this level of total shareholders
equity at any time, it will lose access to those facilities.
Additionally, if an event of default occurs under those
facilities, including AIG failing to maintain $50 billion
of total shareholders equity at any time, which causes the
banks to terminate either of those facilities, then AIG may be
required to collateralize approximately
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 57
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
$2.7 billion of letters of credit that AIG has obtained for
the benefit of its insurance subsidiaries so that these
subsidiaries may obtain statutory recognition of their
intercompany reinsurance transactions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
One-Year
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available
|
|
|
|
|
Term-Out
|
Facility
|
|
Size
|
|
|
Borrower(s)
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
Option
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
AIG:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
364-Day
Syndicated Facility(a)
|
|
$
|
2,125
|
|
|
AIG/AIG Funding(b)
|
|
$
|
2,125
|
|
|
July 2009
|
|
Yes
|
5-Year
Syndicated Facility(a)
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
|
AIG/AIG Funding(b)
|
|
|
1,625
|
|
|
July 2011
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total AIG
|
|
$
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ILFC:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-Year
Syndicated Facility
|
|
$
|
2,500
|
|
|
ILFC
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
October 2011
|
|
No
|
5-Year
Syndicated Facility
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
ILFC
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2010
|
|
No
|
5-Year
Syndicated Facility
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
ILFC
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 2009
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ILFC
|
|
$
|
6,500
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AGF:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
364-Day
Syndicated Facility
|
|
$
|
2,450
|
|
|
American General Finance Corporation
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
July 2009
|
|
Yes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American General Finance, Inc.(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-Year
Syndicated Facility
|
|
|
2,125
|
|
|
American General Finance Corporation
|
|
|
|
|
|
July 2010
|
|
No
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total AGF
|
|
$
|
4,575
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
On October 5, 2008, Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc.
(LBHI), the parent company of Lehman Brothers Bank, FSB (LBB),
filed for bankruptcy protection. LBB is a lender under
AIGs 364-Day Syndicated Facility and 5-Year Syndicated
Facility and had committed to provide $100 million and
$42.5 million, respectively, under these facilities. While
LBB is not included in the LBHI bankruptcy filing, AIG cannot be
certain whether LBB would fulfill it commitments under these
facilities. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Guaranteed by AIG. In September 2008, AIG Capital Corporation
was removed as a borrower on the syndicated facilities. |
|
(c) |
|
AGF is an eligible borrower for up to $400 million
only. |
Credit
Ratings
The cost and availability of unsecured financing for AIG and its
subsidiaries are generally dependent on their short-and
long-term debt ratings. The following table presents the credit
ratings of AIG and certain of its subsidiaries as of
February 18, 2009. In parentheses, following the initial
occurrence in the table of each rating, is an indication of that
ratings relative rank within the agencys rating
categories. That ranking refers only to the
58 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
generic or major rating category and not to the modifiers
appended to the rating by the rating agencies to denote relative
position within such generic or major category.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Short-term Debt
|
|
Senior Long-term Debt
|
|
|
Moodys
|
|
S&P
|
|
Fitch
|
|
Moodys(a)
|
|
S&P(b)
|
|
Fitch(c)
|
|
AIG
|
|
P-1 (1st of 3)(g)
|
|
A-1 (1st of 8)(e)
|
|
F1 (1st of 5)
|
|
A3 (3rd of 9)(g)
|
|
A- (3rd of 8)(e)
|
|
A (3rd of 9)
|
AIG Financial Products Corp.(d)
|
|
P-1(g)
|
|
A-1(e)
|
|
|
|
A3(g)
|
|
A-(e)
|
|
|
AIG Funding(d)
|
|
P-1(g)
|
|
A-1(e)
|
|
F1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ILFC
|
|
P-2 (2nd of 3)(h)
|
|
A-2 (2nd of 8)(f)
|
|
F1(j)
|
|
Baa1 (4th of 9)(h)
|
|
BBB+ (4th of 8)(f)
|
|
A(j)
|
American General Finance Corporation
|
|
P-2(i)
|
|
B (4th of 8)
|
|
F1(j)
|
|
Baa1(g)
|
|
BB+ (5th of 8)(i)
|
|
BBB (4th of 9)(j)
|
American General Finance, Inc.
|
|
P-2(g)
|
|
A-3 (3rd of 8)
|
|
F1(j)
|
|
|
|
|
|
BBB(j)
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Moodys appends numerical modifiers 1, 2 and 3 to the
generic rating categories to show relative position within the
rating categories. |
|
(b) |
|
S&P ratings may be modified by the addition of a plus or
minus sign to show relative standing within the major rating
categories. |
|
(c) |
|
Fitch ratings may be modified by the addition of a plus or
minus sign to show relative standing within the major rating
categories. |
|
(d) |
|
AIG guarantees all obligations of AIG Financial Products
Corp. and AIG Funding. |
|
(e) |
|
Credit Watch Negative. |
|
(f) |
|
Credit Watch Developing. |
|
(g) |
|
Under Review for Possible Downgrade. |
|
(h) |
|
Under Review with Direction Uncertain. |
|
(i) |
|
Negative Outlook. |
|
(j) |
|
Rating Watch Evolving. |
These credit ratings are current opinions of the rating
agencies. As such, they may be changed, suspended or withdrawn
at any time by the rating agencies as a result of changes in, or
unavailability of, information or based on other circumstances.
Ratings may also be withdrawn at AIG managements request.
This discussion of ratings is not a complete list of ratings of
AIG and its subsidiaries.
Ratings triggers have been defined by one
independent rating agency to include clauses or agreements the
outcome of which depends upon the level of ratings maintained by
one or more rating agencies. Ratings triggers
generally relate to events that (i) could result in the
termination or limitation of credit availability, or require
accelerated repayment, (ii) could result in the termination
of business contracts or (iii) could require a company to
post collateral for the benefit of counterparties.
A significant portion of AIGFPs GIAs, structured financing
arrangements and financial derivative transactions include
provisions that require AIGFP, upon a downgrade of AIGs
long-term debt ratings, to post collateral or, with the consent
of the counterparties, assign or repay its positions or arrange
a substitute guarantee of its obligations by an obligor with
higher debt ratings. Furthermore, certain downgrades of
AIGs long-term senior debt ratings would permit either AIG
or the counterparties to elect early termination of contracts.
The actual amount of collateral that AIGFP would be required to
post to counterparties in the event of such downgrades, or the
aggregate amount of payments that AIG could be required to make,
depends on market conditions, the fair value of outstanding
affected transactions and other factors prevailing at the time
of the downgrade. For the impact of a downgrade in AIGs
credit ratings, see Item 1A. Risk Factors
Credit Ratings.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 59
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Contractual
Obligations
Contractual obligations in total, and by remaining maturity
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments due by Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
3+-5
|
|
|
More Than
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
Payments
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Borrowings(a)
|
|
$
|
131,204
|
|
|
$
|
20,417
|
|
|
$
|
33,574
|
|
|
$
|
18,607
|
|
|
$
|
58,606
|
|
Fed Facility
|
|
|
40,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest payments on borrowings
|
|
|
81,860
|
|
|
|
5,361
|
|
|
|
9,281
|
|
|
|
22,832
|
|
|
|
44,386
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss reserves(b)
|
|
|
89,258
|
|
|
|
24,546
|
|
|
|
27,224
|
|
|
|
12,942
|
|
|
|
24,546
|
|
Insurance and investment contract liabilities(c)
|
|
|
620,440
|
|
|
|
32,059
|
|
|
|
41,703
|
|
|
|
38,103
|
|
|
|
508,575
|
|
GIC liabilities(d)
|
|
|
18,020
|
|
|
|
6,175
|
|
|
|
2,472
|
|
|
|
3,406
|
|
|
|
5,967
|
|
Aircraft purchase commitments
|
|
|
16,677
|
|
|
|
3,028
|
|
|
|
448
|
|
|
|
2,917
|
|
|
|
10,284
|
|
Operating leases
|
|
|
4,258
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
|
|
699
|
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
Other long-term obligations
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
228
|
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(e)(f)
|
|
$
|
1,002,710
|
|
|
$
|
92,614
|
|
|
$
|
116,104
|
|
|
$
|
139,949
|
|
|
$
|
654,043
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes commercial paper and borrowings incurred by
consolidated investments and includes hybrid financial
instrument liabilities recorded at fair value. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents future loss and loss adjustment expense payments
estimated based on historical loss development payment patterns.
Due to the significance of the assumptions used, the periodic
amounts presented could be materially different from actual
required payments. |
|
(c) |
|
Insurance and investment contract liabilities include various
investment-type products with contractually scheduled
maturities, including periodic payments of a term certain
nature. Insurance and investment contract liabilities also
include benefit and claim liabilities, of which a significant
portion represents policies and contracts that do not have
stated contractual maturity dates and may not result in any
future payment obligations. For these policies and contracts
(i) AIG is currently not making payments until the
occurrence of an insurable event, such as death or disability,
(ii) payments are conditional on survivorship, or
(iii) payment may occur due to a surrender or other
non-scheduled event out of AIGs control. AIG has made
significant assumptions to determine the estimated undiscounted
cash flows of these contractual policy benefits, which
assumptions include mortality, morbidity, future lapse rates,
expenses, investment returns and interest crediting rates,
offset by expected future deposits and premiums on inforce
policies. Due to the significance of the assumptions used, the
periodic amounts presented could be materially different from
actual required payments. The amounts presented in this table
are undiscounted and therefore exceed the future policy benefits
and policyholder contract deposits included in the balance
sheet. |
|
(d) |
|
Represents guaranteed maturities under GICs. |
|
(e) |
|
Does not reflect unrecognized tax benefits of
$3.4 billion, the timing of which is uncertain. |
|
(f) |
|
The majority of AIGFPs credit default swaps require
AIGFP to provide credit protection on a designated portfolio of
loans or debt securities. At December 31, 2008, the fair
value derivative liability was $5.9 billion relating to
AIGFPs super senior multi-sector CDO credit default swap
portfolio, net of amounts realized in extinguishing derivative
obligations. Due to the long-term maturities of these credit
default swaps, AIG is unable to make reasonable estimates of the
periods during which any payments would be made. |
60 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements and Commercial Commitments
Off Balance Sheet Arrangements and Commercial Commitments in
total, and by remaining maturity were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Commitment Expiration
|
|
|
|
Total Amounts
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
3+-5
|
|
|
Over Five
|
|
at December 31, 2008
|
|
Committed
|
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Guarantees:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity facilities(a)
|
|
$
|
912
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
799
|
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
Standby letters of credit
|
|
|
1,541
|
|
|
|
1,340
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
Construction guarantees(b)
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
Guarantees of indebtedness
|
|
|
776
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
All other guarantees
|
|
|
1,857
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
1,712
|
|
Commitments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment commitments(c)
|
|
|
9,185
|
|
|
|
2,575
|
|
|
|
3,742
|
|
|
|
1,951
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
Commitments to extend credit
|
|
|
629
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
437
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
|
306
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other commercial commitments(d)
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
160
|
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
16,405
|
|
|
$
|
4,502
|
|
|
$
|
4,412
|
|
|
$
|
3,324
|
|
|
$
|
4,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Primarily liquidity facilities provided in connection with
certain municipal swap transactions and collateralized bond
obligations. |
|
(b) |
|
Primarily AIG SunAmerica construction guarantees connected to
affordable housing investments. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes commitments to invest in limited partnerships,
private equity, hedge funds and mutual funds and commitments to
purchase and develop real estate in the United States and
abroad. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes options to acquire aircraft. Excludes commitments
with respect to pension plans. The annual pension contribution
for 2009 is expected to be approximately $600 million for
U.S. and
non-U.S.
plans. |
Arrangements
with Variable Interest Entities
AIG enters into various arrangements with variable interest
entities (VIEs) in the normal course of business. AIGs
insurance companies are involved with VIEs primarily as passive
investors in debt securities (rated and unrated) and equity
interests issued by VIEs. Through its Financial Services and
Asset Management operations, AIG has participated in
arrangements that included designing and structuring entities,
warehousing and managing the collateral of the entities,
entering into insurance transactions with VIEs. Interest holders
in the VIEs generally have recourse only to the assets and cash
flows of the VIEs and do not have recourse to AIG, except, in
limited circumstances, when AIG has provided a guarantee to the
VIEs interest holders.
Under FIN 46(R), AIG consolidates a VIE when it is the
primary beneficiary of the entity. The primary beneficiary is
the party that either (i) absorbs a majority of the
VIEs expected losses; (ii) receives a majority of the
VIEs expected residual returns; or (iii) both. For a
further discussion of AIGs involvement with VIEs, see
Note 9 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Outlook
General disruptions in the global equity and credit markets and
the liquidity issues at AIG have negatively affected the results
of each of AIGs operating segments as discussed below.
General
Insurance
Commercial Insurance has been generally successful in retaining
clients, although some have reduced the number of lines or
limits of coverage due in part to concerns over AIGs
financial strength. In addition, the number
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 61
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
of new business opportunities has declined since September of
2008. Senior management has spent considerable time since
September 2008 meeting with policyholders and brokers explaining
the financial strength of Commercial Insurance and the
protections afforded policyholders by insurance regulations.
However, net premiums written declined 22 percent in the
fourth quarter of 2008 compared to the same period of 2007. The
retention of existing business continues to be moderately lower
than in the comparable prior year period, however retention
levels have improved in the early part of 2009 compared to the
fourth quarter of 2008.
Overall, rates in Commercial Insurance are essentially flat in
early 2009 compared to the first quarter of 2008. The
stabilization of rates is an improvement from the fourth quarter
of 2008 and reflects the offsetting effects of downward pressure
on premiums from the current recessionary environment and the
recent introduction of new competitors in the marketplace and
the upward pressure on premiums from the combination of
investment and underwriting losses suffered by the commercial
insurance industry.
AIG expects that the current recessionary environment will
continue to affect UGCs operating results for the
foreseeable future and will result in a significant operating
loss for UGC in 2009.
Foreign General Insurance has been successful in retaining
business in its property, casualty and consumer lines. During
the critical first quarter 2009 renewal period with more than
30 percent of the annual production expected, business
retention was strong in Foreign General Insurances top
three regions, U.K./Ireland, Europe and the Far East, with the
significant majority of clients maintaining their relationship
with AIG. However, there was some expected
de-risking among customers to further diversify
their portfolios as well as a slight reduction in new business
production. Because the three regions represent the majority of
business, recent business activity is comparable to 2008.
Overall, gross premiums to date for 2009 were essentially flat
from the comparable period of 2008 as measured in original
currency.
Life
Insurance & Retirement Services
AIG expects that the aforementioned events and AIGs
previously announced asset disposition plan will continue to
adversely affect Life Insurance & Retirement Services
operating results in 2009, specifically net investment income,
deferred policy acquisition costs and sales inducement asset
(SIA) amortization and net realized capital gains (losses). In
addition, AIGs liquidity issues have affected certain
operations through higher surrender activity, primarily in the
U.S. domestic retirement fixed annuity business and foreign
investment-oriented and retirement products in Japan and Asia.
While surrender levels have declined from their peaks in
mid-September of 2008, they continue to be higher than historic
levels in certain products and countries and AIG expects them to
continue to be volatile.
These uncertainties, together with rating agency downgrades,
have resulted in significantly reduced levels of new sales
activity, particularly among products and markets where ratings
are critical. Sales of investment-oriented and retirement
services products have also declined due to the general decline
in the equity markets. New sales activity is expected to remain
at lower levels until the uncertainties relating to AIG are
resolved.
Financial
Services
AIGFP began unwinding its businesses and portfolios during the
fourth quarter of 2008, and these activities are expected to
continue at least through 2009. In connection with these
activities, AIGFP has disaggregated its portfolio of existing
transactions into a number of separate books, and
has developed a plan for addressing each book, including each
books risks, risk mitigation options, monitoring metrics
and certain implications of various potential outcomes. Each
plan has been reviewed by a steering committee whose membership
includes senior executives of AIG. The plans are subject to
change as efforts progress and as conditions in the financial
markets evolve, and they contemplate, depending on the book in
question, alternative strategies, including sales, assignments
or other transfers of positions, terminations of positions,
and/or
run-offs of positions in accordance with existing terms.
Execution of the plans is overseen by a transaction approval
process involving increasingly senior members of AIGFPs
and AIGs respective management groups as specific actions
entail greater liquidity and revenue consequences. Successful
execution of the plans is subject, to varying degrees depending
on the transactions of a given book, to market conditions and,
in many circumstances, counterparty negotiation and agreement.
62 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
As a consequence of its wind-down strategy, AIGFP is entering
into new derivative transactions only to hedge its current
portfolio, reduce risk and hedge the currency, interest rate and
other market risks associated with its affiliated businesses.
AIGFP has already reduced the size of certain portions of its
portfolio, including effecting a substantial reduction in credit
derivative transactions in respect of multi-sector CDOs (see
Termination of $62 billion of CDS below), a sale of its
commodity index business, termination of its activities as a
foreign exchange prime broker, sale and other disposition of the
large majority of its energy/infrastructure investment
portfolio. Due to the long-term duration of many of AIGFPs
derivative contracts and to the complexity of AIGFPs
portfolio, AIG expects that an orderly wind-down will take a
substantial period of time. The cost of executing the wind-down
will depend on many factors, many of which are not within
AIGFPs control, including market conditions, AIGFPs
access to markets via market counterparties, the availability of
liquidity and the potential implications of further rating
downgrades.
AIGCFG experienced significant deposit withdrawals in Hong Kong
during September 2008. The inability of AIGCFG to access its
traditional sources of funding resulted in AIG lending
$1.6 billion to subsidiaries of AIGCFG in September and
October of 2008. Additional funding during the remainder of the
fourth quarter of 2008 was not material. AIG has entered into
contracts to sell certain finance operations in Taiwan, Thailand
and the Philippines.
Asset
Management
Distressed global markets have reduced the value of assets under
management, translating to lower base management fees and
reduced carried interest revenues. Tight credit markets have put
pressure on the commercial and residential real estate markets,
which has caused values in certain geographic locations to fall,
resulting in impairment charges on real estate held for
investment purposes.
Liquidity issues at AIG parent and lower asset performance as a
result of challenging market conditions have contributed to the
loss of institutional and retail clients, as well as higher
redemptions from some of AIG subsidiaries managed hedge
and mutual funds, have prevented AIG subsidiaries from launching
new funds and will continue to adversely affect Asset Management
results.
Within the Spread-Based Investment business, distressed markets
have resulted in significant loss of invested asset value, and
AIG expects such losses to continue through mid 2009. In
addition, AIG does not expect to issue any additional debt to
fund the Matched Investment Program for the foreseeable future.
As AIG implements the proposed transactions with the NY Fed and
United States Department of the Treasury described above and in
Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, AIG
expects to incur significant additional restructuring related
charges, such as accelerated amortization of the pre-paid
commitment asset and, potentially, the write-off of intangible
assets. Further, if AIG continues to incur losses in its
businesses, AIG may need to write off material amounts of
goodwill.
Results
of Operations
Consolidated
Results
Fourth quarter 2008 net loss
Due to continued severe market deterioration and charges related
to ongoing restructuring activities, AIG incurred a substantial
net loss of $61.7 billion in the fourth quarter of 2008.
This loss resulted primarily from the following:
|
|
|
|
|
net realized capital losses arising from other-than-temporary
impairment charges of $18.6 billion ($13.0 billion
after tax) reflecting severity losses primarily related to CMBS,
other structured securities and securities of financial
institutions due to rapid and severe market valuation declines
where the impairment period was not deemed temporary; losses
related to the change in AIGs intent and ability to hold
to recovery certain securities; and issuer-specific credit
events, including charges associated with investments in
financial institutions;
|
|
|
|
net realized capital losses of $2.4 billion
($1.7 billion after tax) related to certain securities
lending activities which were deemed to be sales due to reduced
levels of collateral provided by counterparties;
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 63
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
net realized capital losses of $2.3 billion
($1.6 billion after tax) related to declines in fair values
of RMBS for the month of October prior to the sale of these
securities to ML II;
|
|
|
|
net realized capital losses of $1.7 billion
($1.2 billion after tax) primarily related to foreign
exchange transactions and derivatives activity;
|
|
|
|
unrealized market valuation losses on AIGFPs super senior
credit default swap portfolio totaling $6.9 billion ($4.5
billion after tax); a credit valuation loss of $7.8 billion
($5.1 billion after tax) representing the effect of changes
in credit spreads on the valuation of AIGFPs assets and
liabilities; and losses primarily from winding down of
AIGFPs businesses and portfolios of $1.5 billion
($1.0 billion after tax);
|
|
|
|
losses on hedges not qualifying for hedge accounting treatment
under FAS 133 of $3.3 billion ($2.2 billion after
tax) largely due to the significant decline in
U.S. interest rates, resulting in a decrease in the fair
value of the derivatives, which primarily economically hedge
AIGs debt. To a lesser extent, the strengthening of the
U.S. dollar, mainly against the British Pound and Euro
decreased the fair value of the foreign currency derivatives
economically hedging AIGs non-U.S. dollar denominated
debt and foreign exchange transactions;
|
|
|
|
interest expense associated with the Fed Facility of
$10.6 billion ($6.9 billion after tax), including
accelerated amortization of the prepaid commitment fee of
$6.6 billion ($4.3 billion after tax);
|
|
|
|
goodwill impairment charges of $3.6 billion, principally
related to the General Insurance and Domestic Life Insurance and
Domestic Retirement Services businesses; and
|
|
|
|
the inability to obtain a tax benefit for a significant amount
of the losses incurred during the quarter as reflected in the
addition to the valuation allowance of $17.6 billion, and
other discrete items of $3.4 billion.
|
AIGs consolidated statements of income (loss) for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and other considerations
|
|
$
|
83,505
|
|
|
$
|
79,302
|
|
|
$
|
74,213
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
12,222
|
|
|
|
28,619
|
|
|
|
26,070
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses)
|
|
|
(55,484
|
)
|
|
|
(3,592
|
)
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized market valuation losses on AIGFP super senior credit
default swap portfolio
|
|
|
(28,602
|
)
|
|
|
(11,472
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (loss)
|
|
|
(537
|
)
|
|
|
17,207
|
|
|
|
12,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
11,104
|
|
|
|
110,064
|
|
|
|
113,387
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits, claims and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policyholder benefits and claims incurred
|
|
|
63,299
|
|
|
|
66,115
|
|
|
|
60,287
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
Policy acquisition and other insurance expenses
|
|
|
27,565
|
|
|
|
20,396
|
|
|
|
19,413
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
17,007
|
|
|
|
4,751
|
|
|
|
3,657
|
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Restructuring expenses and related asset impairment and other
expenses
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
11,236
|
|
|
|
9,859
|
|
|
|
8,343
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, claims and expenses
|
|
|
119,865
|
|
|
|
101,121
|
|
|
|
91,700
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit), minority
interest and cumulative effect of change in accounting
principles
|
|
|
(108,761
|
)
|
|
|
8,943
|
|
|
|
21,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
64 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
1,706
|
|
|
|
3,219
|
|
|
|
5,489
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(10,080
|
)
|
|
|
(1,764
|
)
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(8,374
|
)
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
|
|
6,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority interest and cumulative effect
of change in accounting principles
|
|
|
(100,387
|
)
|
|
|
7,488
|
|
|
|
15,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
|
|
(1,288
|
)
|
|
|
(1,136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principles
|
|
|
(99,289
|
)
|
|
|
6,200
|
|
|
|
14,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of
tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(99,289
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,200
|
|
|
$
|
14,048
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(56
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums
and Other Considerations
2008
and 2007 Comparison
Premiums and other considerations increased in 2008 compared to
2007 primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
growth in Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services
of $3.3 billion resulting from increased production and
favorable foreign exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
an increase of $1.7 billion in Foreign General Insurance
due to growth in commercial and consumer lines driven by new
business from both established and new distribution channels, a
decrease in the use of reinsurance and favorable foreign
exchange rates; and
|
|
|
|
growth in Domestic Life Insurance due to an increase in sales of
payout annuities sales and growth in life insurance business in
force.
|
These increases were partially offset by a decline in Commercial
Insurance premiums of $1.5 billion primarily from lower
U.S. workers compensation premiums attributable to
declining rates, lower employment levels and increased
competition, as well as a decline in other casualty lines of
business.
2007
and 2006 Comparison
Premiums and other considerations increased in 2007 compared to
2006 primarily due to:
|
|
|
|
|
growth in Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services
of $2.4 billion as a result of increased life insurance
production, growing group products business in Europe, improved
sales in Thailand and the favorable effect of foreign exchange
rates;
|
|
|
|
an increase of $1.8 billion in Foreign General Insurance
primarily due to growth in new business from both established
and new distribution channels, including Central Insurance Co.
Ltd. Taiwan acquired in late 2006; and
|
|
|
|
growth in Domestic Life Insurance primarily due an increase in
life insurance business in force and payout annuity premiums.
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 65
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Net
Investment Income
The components of consolidated net investment income were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, including short-term investments
|
|
$
|
20,839
|
|
|
$
|
21,445
|
|
|
$
|
19,773
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
Interest on mortgage and other loans
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Partnerships
|
|
|
(2,022
|
)
|
|
|
1,986
|
|
|
|
1,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Mutual funds
|
|
|
(989
|
)
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
948
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
Trading account losses
|
|
|
(725
|
)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments*
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
1,241
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income before policyholder income and trading
gains (losses)
|
|
|
20,213
|
|
|
|
26,773
|
|
|
|
25,088
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
Policyholder investment income and trading gains (losses)
|
|
|
(6,984
|
)
|
|
|
2,903
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
|
13,229
|
|
|
|
29,676
|
|
|
|
27,104
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
Investment expenses
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
|
|
1,057
|
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
12,222
|
|
|
$
|
28,619
|
|
|
$
|
26,070
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes net investment income from securities lending
activities, representing interest earned on securities lending
invested collateral offset by interest expense on securities
lending payable. |
2008
and 2007 Comparison
Net investment income decreased in 2008 compared to 2007 due to:
|
|
|
|
|
losses from partnership and mutual fund investments reflecting
significantly weaker market conditions in 2008 than in 2007;
|
|
|
|
significant policyholder investment income and trading losses
for Life Insurance & Retirement Services (together,
policyholder trading losses), which were $7.0 billion in
2008 compared to policyholder trading gains of $2.9 billion
for 2007, reflecting equity market declines. Policyholder
trading gains (losses) are offset by a change in incurred policy
losses and benefits expense. Policyholder trading gains (losses)
generally reflect the trends in equity markets, principally in
Japan and Asia;
|
|
|
|
losses related to AIGs economic interest in ML II and
investment in ML III of approximately $1.1 billion in
2008; and
|
|
|
|
the effect of increased levels of short-term investments, for
liquidity purposes.
|
2007
and 2006 Comparison
Net investment income increased in 2007 compared to 2006 due to
higher levels of interest income on fixed maturity securities,
an increase in income from partnerships as well as higher
policyholder trading gains. Partially offsetting these increases
were trading account losses related to certain
investment-oriented products in the U.K. for Life
Insurance & Retirement Services. The policyholder
trading gains for 2007 generally reflected the trends in equity
markets, principally in Japan and Asia.
66 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Net Realized Capital Gains (Losses)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Sales of fixed maturity securities
|
|
$
|
(5,266
|
)
|
|
$
|
(468
|
)
|
|
$
|
(382
|
)
|
Sales of equity securities
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
Sales of real estate and other assets
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severity*
|
|
|
(29,146
|
)
|
|
|
(1,557
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Lack of intent to hold to recovery
|
|
|
(12,110
|
)
|
|
|
(1,054
|
)
|
|
|
(636
|
)
|
Trading at 25 percent or more discount for nine consecutive
months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency declines
|
|
|
(1,903
|
)
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer-specific credit events
|
|
|
(5,985
|
)
|
|
|
(515
|
)
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
Adverse projected cash flows on structured securities
|
|
|
(1,661
|
)
|
|
|
(446
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Foreign exchange transactions
|
|
|
3,123
|
|
|
|
(643
|
)
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
(3,656
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(55,484
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,592
|
)
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
In 2007, includes $643 million related to AIGFP reported
in other income. |
2008
and 2007 Comparison
Net realized capital losses increased $51.9 billion in 2008
compared to 2007 primarily due to an increase in
other-than-temporary impairment charges of $46.7 billion.
The increase in other-than-temporary impairment charges included
the following significant items:
|
|
|
|
|
an increase in severity losses primarily related to certain
RMBS, other structured securities and securities of financial
institutions due to rapid and severe market valuation declines
where the impairment period was not deemed temporary;
|
|
|
|
losses related to the change in AIGs intent and ability to
hold to recovery certain securities, primarily those held as
collateral in the securities lending program;
|
|
|
|
issuer-specific credit events, including charges associated with
investments in financial institutions; and
|
|
|
|
adverse projected cash flows on certain structured securities
impaired under Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
No. 99-20,
Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased
Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests that Continue to
be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets
(EITF 99
|
-20) and related interpretive guidance.
These other-than-temporary impairment charges were partially
offset by the favorable effect of foreign exchange transactions
due to strengthening of the U.S. dollar. See
Investments Portfolio Review
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.
During the fourth quarter of 2008, in connection with certain
securities lending transactions, AIG met the requirements of
sale accounting under FAS 140 because collateral received
was insufficient to fund substantially all of the cost of
purchasing replacement assets for the securities lent to various
counterparties. Accordingly, AIG recognized a loss of
$2.4 billion on deemed sales of these securities. Also, net
realized capital losses in 2008 included a loss of
$2.3 billion, incurred in the fourth quarter of 2008, on
RMBS prior to their purchase by ML II. See
Investments Securities Lending Activities and
Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
2007
and 2006 Comparison
AIG recorded net realized capital losses in 2007 compared to net
realized capital gains in 2006 primarily due to an increase in
other-than-temporary impairment charges. Other-than-temporary
impairment charges included an
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 67
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
increase in severity losses primarily related to certain RMBS
and other structured securities, resulting from the disruption
in the U.S. residential mortgage and credit markets.
Unrealized
Market Valuation Losses on AIGFP Super Senior Credit Default
Swap Portfolio
The unrealized market valuation losses on AIGFPs super
senior credit default swap portfolio increased in 2008 compared
to 2007 due to significant widening in credit spreads and the
downgrades of RMBS and CDO securities by rating agencies in 2008
driven by the credit concerns resulting from
U.S. residential mortgages and the severe liquidity crisis
affecting the markets. In connection with the termination of
$62.1 billion net notional amount of CDS transactions
related to multi-sector CDOs purchased in the ML III
transaction, AIG Financial Products Corp. paid
$32.5 billion through the surrender of collateral
previously posted (net of $2.5 billion received pursuant to
the shortfall agreement), of which $2.5 billion (included
in Other income (loss)) is related to certain 2a-7 Put
transactions written on multi-sector CDOs purchased by
ML III. These losses did not affect income, as unrealized
market valuation losses were already recorded in income. See
Capital Markets Results and Critical Accounting
Estimates Valuation of Level 3 Assets and
Liabilities and Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
Other
Income (loss)
2008
and 2007 Comparison
Other Income (loss) decreased in 2008 compared to 2007 primarily
due to increased losses in Capital Markets of
$13.7 billion, which includes a credit valuation adjustment
of $9.1 billion on AIGFPs assets and liabilities
which are measured at fair value. Asset Management other income
decreased by $2.4 billion primarily as a result of lower
partnership income related to the Spread-Based Investment
Business reflecting weaker market conditions in 2008 and a
decline in Institutional Asset Management revenues reflecting
lower carried interest and losses on sales of real estate
investments. These decreases were partially offset by increased
rental revenues for ILFC, driven by a larger aircraft fleet and
higher lease rates.
2007
and 2006 Comparison
Other Income increased in 2007 compared to 2006 primarily due to
a $2 billion positive effect for AIGFP related to hedging
activities that did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment
under FAS 133, increased Asset Management revenues
primarily resulting from higher partnership income and carried
interest as well as increased rental revenues for ILFC, driven
by a larger aircraft fleet and higher lease rates.
Policyholder
Benefits and Claims Incurred
2008
and 2007 Comparison
Policyholder benefits and claims incurred decreased in 2008
compared to 2007 due to a reduction in incurred policy losses
and benefits expense for Life Insurance & Retirement
Services of $7.0 billion in 2008 compared to an increase of
$2.9 billion in 2007 related to policyholder trading gains
(losses) as discussed above in net investment income. These
losses more than offset increased claims and claims adjustment
expenses of $5.6 billion in AIGs General Insurance
operations, which reflected increased catastrophe losses of
$1.5 billion principally from hurricanes Ike and Gustav and
a $1.8 billion increase in Mortgage Guaranty claims
incurred, reflecting the continued deterioration of the
U.S. housing market.
2007
and 2006 Comparison
Policyholder benefits and claims incurred increased in 2007
compared to 2006 primarily due to increases in policyholder
benefits and claims incurred of $3.2 billion in Life
Insurance & Retirement Services due to losses and
benefits arising from policyholder trading losses of
$886 million discussed above in Net Investment Income, a
$1.1 billion increase in Foreign General Insurance
resulting from the June 2007 U.K. floods, an increase in severe
but non-catastrophic losses and higher frequency of non-severe
losses, and a $1.1 billion increase in Mortgage Guaranty
claims incurred resulting from the deterioration of the
U.S. housing market.
68 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Policy
Acquisition and Other Insurance Expenses
2008
and 2007 Comparison
Policy acquisition and other insurance expenses increased in
2008 compared to 2007 primarily due to a $3.6 billion
increase in General Insurance expenses and a $3.7 billion
increase in Life Insurance & Retirement Services
expenses. General Insurance expenses increased primarily due to
goodwill impairment charges of $2.0 billion, including
$1.2 billion from Commercial Insurance and
$696 million from Personal Lines, respectively, primarily
related to goodwill arising from acquisitions. Life
Insurance & Retirement Services expenses increased
primarily due to $1.2 billion of goodwill impairment
charges related to Domestic Life Insurance and Domestic
Retirement Services of $402 million and $817 million,
respectively. Life Insurance & Retirement Services
expenses also increased as a result of the effect of foreign
exchange, growth in the business and the effect of FAS 159
implementation.
2007
and 2006 Comparison
Policy acquisition and other insurance expenses increased in
2007 compared to 2006 primarily due costs associated with
realigning certain legal entities through which Foreign General
Insurance operates and the increased significance of Foreign
General consumer lines business, which have higher acquisition
costs. Life Insurance & Retirement Services expenses
increased principally as a result of the effect of growth in the
Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services business,
increased DAC amortization related to the adoption of
SOP 05-1,
higher operating expenses related to remediation activities and
the effect of foreign exchange.
Interest
Expense
2008
and 2007 Comparison
Interest expense increased in 2008 compared to 2007 on higher
levels of borrowings. Interest expense in 2008 included
$11.4 billion of interest expense on the Fed Facility which
was comprised of $9.3 billion of amortization of the
prepaid commitment fee asset associated with the Fed Facility,
including accelerated amortization of the prepaid commitment
asset of $6.6 billion in connection with the restructuring
of the Fed Facility and $1.9 billion of accrued compounding
interest. Interest expense in 2008 also included interest on the
debt and Equity Units from the dates of issuance in May 2008.
The above amounts are reflected in the Other category in
AIGs segment results.
2007
and 2006 Comparison
Interest expense increased in 2007 compared to 2006 reflecting
higher levels of borrowings, including interest on the junior
subordinated debt issued in March and June 2007, borrowings used
to fund the MIP and borrowings used for general corporate
purposes.
Restructuring
expenses and related asset impairment and other
expenses
As described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements, AIG commenced an organization-wide restructuring
plan under which some of its businesses will be divested, some
will be held for later divestiture, and some businesses will be
prepared for potential subsequent offerings to the public. In
connection with activities under this plan, AIG recorded
restructuring and separation expenses of $758 million in
2008, consisting of severance expenses of $89 million,
contract termination expenses of $27 million, asset
write-downs of $51 million, other exit expenses of
$140 million and separation expenses of $451 million.
Other exit expenses primarily include consulting and other
professional fees related to (i) asset disposition
activities, (ii) AIGs debt and capital restructuring
program with the NY Fed and the United States Department of
the Treasury and (iii) unwinding of AIGFPs businesses
and portfolios.
Severance and separation expenses described above include
retention awards of $492 million to key employees to
maintain ongoing business operations and facilitate the
successful execution of the restructuring and asset disposition
plan. This amount also includes retention awards to AIGFPs
employees under its retention program, which was established in
the first quarter of 2008 due to the declining market
environment, to manage and
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 69
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
unwind its complex businesses. The total amount expected to be
incurred related to these retention programs is approximately
$1.0 billion.
For the year ended December 31, 2008, $139 million,
$68 million, $287 million and $69 million of the
restructuring and separation expenses have been recorded within
the General Insurance, Life Insurance & Retirement
Services, Financial Services and Asset Management segments,
respectively, while $195 million has been recorded in Other
operations.
Total restructuring and separation expenses could have a
material affect on future results of operations and cash flows.
Other
Expenses
2008
and 2007 Comparison
Other Expenses increased in 2008 compared to 2007 primarily due
to goodwill impairment charges of $791 million in 2008 in
the Financial Services segment related to the Consumer Finance
and Capital Markets businesses, which resulted from the downturn
in the housing markets, the credit crisis and the intent to
unwind AIGFPs businesses and portfolios. In addition,
other expenses in 2008 increased compared to 2007 due to higher
AGF provisions for finance receivable losses of
$674 million in response to the higher levels of
delinquencies in AGFs finance receivable portfolio.
2007
and 2006 Comparison
Other Expenses increased in 2007 compared to 2006 primarily due
to increases in MIP and compensation related expenses in Asset
Management, increases in depreciation expense on flight
equipment in line with the increase in the size of the aircraft
fleet and an increase in AGFs provision for finance
receivable losses of $206 million.
Income
tax expense (benefit)
2008
and 2007 Comparison
The effective tax rate on the pre-tax loss for 2008 was
7.7 percent. The effective tax rate was lower than the
statutory rate of 35 percent due primarily to
$26.1 billion of deferred tax expense recorded during 2008,
comprising $5.5 billion of deferred tax expense
attributable to the potential sale of foreign businesses and a
$20.6 billion valuation allowance to reduce its deferred
tax asset to an amount that AIG believes is more likely than not
to be realized.
Realization of the deferred tax asset depends on AIGs
ability to generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate
character within the carryforward periods of the jurisdictions
in which the net operating losses and deductible temporary
differences were incurred. AIG assessed its ability to realize
its deferred tax asset of $31.9 billion and concluded a
$20.6 billion valuation allowance was required to reduce
the deferred tax asset to an amount AIG believes is more likely
than not that to be realized. See Note 20 to Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional discussion regarding
deferred tax asset realization.
2007
and 2006 Comparison
The effective tax rate declined from 30.1 percent in 2006
to 16.3 percent in 2007, primarily due to the unrealized
market valuation losses on AIGFPs super senior credit
default swap portfolio and other-than-temporary impairment
charges. These losses, which are taxed at a U.S. tax rate
of 35 percent and are included in the calculation of income
tax expense, reduced AIGs overall effective tax rate. In
addition, other tax benefits, including tax exempt interest and
effects of foreign operations were proportionately larger in
2007 than in 2006 due to the decline in pre-tax income in 2007.
Furthermore, tax deductions taken in 2007 for SICO compensation
plans for which the expense had been recognized in prior years
also reduced the effective tax rate in 2007.
70 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Segment
Results
The following table summarizes the operations of each
operating segment. See also Note 3 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Insurance
|
|
$
|
44,676
|
|
|
$
|
51,708
|
|
|
$
|
49,206
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
|
|
53,570
|
|
|
|
50,878
|
|
|
|
(94
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
|
(31,095
|
)
|
|
|
(1,309
|
)
|
|
|
7,777
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Management
|
|
|
(4,526
|
)
|
|
|
5,625
|
|
|
|
4,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation and eliminations
|
|
|
(924
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,104
|
|
|
$
|
110,064
|
|
|
$
|
113,387
|
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Insurance
|
|
$
|
(5,023
|
)
|
|
$
|
(106
|
)
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
|
(44,347
|
)
|
|
|
(2,398
|
)
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
|
(498
|
)
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Management
|
|
|
(8,758
|
)
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,142
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(55,484
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,592
|
)
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Insurance
|
|
$
|
(5,746
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,526
|
|
|
$
|
10,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
|
(37,446
|
)
|
|
|
8,186
|
|
|
|
10,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
|
(40,821
|
)
|
|
|
(9,515
|
)
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Management
|
|
|
(9,187
|
)
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(15,055
|
)
|
|
|
(2,140
|
)
|
|
|
(1,435
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation and eliminations
|
|
|
(506
|
)
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(108,761
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,943
|
|
|
$
|
21,687
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(59
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
Insurance Operations
AIGs General Insurance subsidiaries are multiple line
companies writing substantially all lines of property and
casualty insurance and various personal lines both domestically
and abroad and constitute the AIG Property Casualty Group
(formerly known as Domestic General Insurance) and the Foreign
General Insurance Group.
As previously noted, AIG believes it should present and discuss
its financial information in a manner most meaningful to its
financial statement users. Accordingly, in its General Insurance
business, AIG uses certain regulatory measures, where AIG has
determined these measurements to be useful and meaningful.
A critical discipline of a successful general insurance business
is the objective to produce profit from underwriting activities
taking into account costs of capital. AIG views underwriting
results to be critical in the overall evaluation of performance.
Statutory underwriting profit is derived by reducing net
premiums earned by net losses and loss expenses incurred and net
expenses incurred. Statutory accounting generally requires
immediate expense recognition and
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 71
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
ignores the matching of revenues and expenses as required by
GAAP. That is, for statutory purposes, expenses (including
acquisition costs) are recognized immediately, not over the same
period that the revenues are earned. Thus, statutory expenses
exclude changes in DAC.
GAAP provides for the recognition of certain acquisition
expenses at the same time revenues are earned, the accounting
principle of matching. Therefore, acquisition expenses are
deferred and amortized over the period the related net premiums
written are earned. DAC is reviewed for recoverability, and such
review requires management judgment. The most comparable GAAP
measure to statutory underwriting profit is income before income
taxes, minority interest and cumulative effect of change in
accounting principles. A table reconciling statutory
underwriting profit to income before income taxes, minority
interest and cumulative effect of change in accounting
principles is contained in footnote (b) to the following
table. See also Critical Accounting Estimates herein and
Notes 1 and 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
AIG, along with most property and casualty insurance companies,
uses the loss ratio, the expense ratio and the combined ratio as
measures of underwriting performance. The loss ratio is the sum
of claims and claims adjustment expenses divided by net premiums
earned. The expense ratio is underwriting expenses divided by
net premiums earned. These ratios are relative measurements that
describe, for every $100 of net premiums earned, the cost of
losses and expenses, respectively. A combined ratio of less than
100 percent indicates an underwriting profit and over
100 percent indicates an underwriting loss.
Net premiums written are initially deferred and earned based
upon the terms of the underlying policies. The net unearned
premium reserve constitutes deferred revenues which are
generally earned ratably over the policy period. Thus, the net
unearned premium reserve is not fully recognized in income as
net premiums earned until the end of the policy period.
The underwriting environment varies from country to country, as
does the degree of litigation activity. Regulation, product type
and competition have a direct effect on pricing and consequently
on profitability as reflected in underwriting profit and general
insurance ratios.
General
Insurance Results
General Insurance operating income is comprised of statutory
underwriting profit (loss), changes in DAC, net investment
income and net realized capital gains and losses. Operating
income (loss), as well as net premiums written, net premiums
earned, net investment income and net realized capital gains
(losses) and statutory ratios were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except ratios)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums written:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG Property Casualty Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Insurance
|
|
$
|
21,099
|
|
|
$
|
24,112
|
|
|
$
|
24,312
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
Transatlantic
|
|
|
4,108
|
|
|
|
3,953
|
|
|
|
3,633
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Personal Lines
|
|
|
4,514
|
|
|
|
4,808
|
|
|
|
4,654
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
Mortgage Guaranty
|
|
|
1,123
|
|
|
|
1,143
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
32
|
|
Foreign General Insurance
|
|
|
14,390
|
|
|
|
13,051
|
|
|
|
11,401
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
45,234
|
|
|
$
|
47,067
|
|
|
$
|
44,866
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except ratios)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net premiums earned:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG Property Casualty Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Insurance
|
|
$
|
22,351
|
|
|
$
|
23,849
|
|
|
$
|
23,910
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Transatlantic
|
|
|
4,067
|
|
|
|
3,903
|
|
|
|
3,604
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Personal Lines
|
|
|
4,679
|
|
|
|
4,695
|
|
|
|
4,645
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Mortgage Guaranty
|
|
|
1,038
|
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
|
740
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Foreign General Insurance
|
|
|
14,087
|
|
|
|
12,349
|
|
|
|
10,552
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
46,222
|
|
|
$
|
45,682
|
|
|
$
|
43,451
|
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG Property Casualty Group
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Insurance
|
|
$
|
1,969
|
|
|
$
|
3,879
|
|
|
$
|
3,411
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)%
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Transatlantic
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
Personal Lines
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
Mortgage Guaranty
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Foreign General Insurance
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
|
1,388
|
|
|
|
1,484
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Reclassifications and eliminations
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3,477
|
|
|
$
|
6,132
|
|
|
$
|
5,696
|
|
|
|
(43
|
)%
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses)
|
|
$
|
(5,023
|
)
|
|
$
|
(106
|
)
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)(a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG Property Casualty Group Commercial Insurance
|
|
$
|
(3,065
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,305
|
|
|
$
|
5,845
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
25
|
%
|
Transatlantic
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Personal Lines
|
|
|
(785
|
)
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(84
|
)
|
Mortgage Guaranty
|
|
|
(2,475
|
)
|
|
|
(637
|
)
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign General Insurance
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
3,137
|
|
|
|
3,228
|
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Reclassifications and eliminations
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(5,746
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,526
|
|
|
$
|
10,412
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory underwriting profit (loss)(a)(b):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG Property Casualty Group Commercial Insurance
|
|
$
|
(1,465
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,404
|
|
|
$
|
2,322
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
47
|
%
|
Transatlantic
|
|
|
(80
|
)
|
|
|
165
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
Personal Lines
|
|
|
(944
|
)
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage Guaranty
|
|
|
(2,666
|
)
|
|
|
(849
|
)
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign General Insurance
|
|
|
1,014
|
|
|
|
1,544
|
|
|
|
1,565
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(4,141
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,073
|
|
|
$
|
4,408
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG Property Casualty Group(a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss ratio
|
|
|
86.3
|
|
|
|
71.2
|
|
|
|
69.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense ratio
|
|
|
30.1
|
|
|
|
20.6
|
|
|
|
21.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio
|
|
|
116.4
|
|
|
|
91.8
|
|
|
|
91.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 73
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except ratios)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign General Insurance(a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss ratio
|
|
|
55.6
|
|
|
|
50.6
|
|
|
|
48.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense ratio
|
|
|
36.9
|
|
|
|
35.1
|
|
|
|
34.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio
|
|
|
92.5
|
|
|
|
85.7
|
|
|
|
83.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated(a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss ratio
|
|
|
76.9
|
|
|
|
65.6
|
|
|
|
64.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expense ratio
|
|
|
32.2
|
|
|
|
24.5
|
|
|
|
24.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined ratio
|
|
|
109.1
|
|
|
|
90.1
|
|
|
|
89.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Catastrophe-related losses in 2008 and 2007 by reporting unit
were as follows. There were no significant catastrophe-related
losses in 2006. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Net Reinstatement
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Net Reinstatement
|
|
|
|
Related Losses
|
|
|
Premium Cost
|
|
|
Related Losses
|
|
|
Premium Cost
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Reporting Unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Insurance
|
|
$
|
1,408
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
Transatlantic
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Personal Lines
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
Foreign General Insurance
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,832
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Statutory underwriting profit (loss) is a measure that U.S.
domiciled insurance companies are required to report to their
regulatory authorities. The following table reconciles statutory
underwriting profit (loss) to operating income (loss) for
General Insurance for the years ended December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006: |
74 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
Reclassifications
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Transatlantic
|
|
|
Lines
|
|
|
Guaranty
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
and Eliminations
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory underwriting profit (loss)
|
|
$
|
(1,465
|
)
|
|
$
|
(80
|
)
|
|
$
|
(944
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,666
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,014
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(4,141
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) in DAC
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
1,969
|
|
|
|
440
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
651
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
3,477
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses)
|
|
|
(3,479
|
)
|
|
|
(428
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(1,080
|
)
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
(5,023
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(3,065
|
)
|
|
$
|
(61
|
)
|
|
$
|
(785
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,475
|
)
|
|
$
|
618
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
(5,746
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory underwriting profit (loss)
|
|
$
|
3,404
|
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
$
|
(191
|
)
|
|
$
|
(849
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,544
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,073
|
|
Increase in DAC
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
3,879
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
|
1,388
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6,132
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses)
|
|
|
(75
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
7,305
|
|
|
$
|
661
|
|
|
$
|
67
|
|
|
$
|
(637
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,137
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statutory underwriting profit (loss)
|
|
$
|
2,322
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
204
|
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
|
$
|
1,565
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,408
|
|
Increase in DAC
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
3,411
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
1,484
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
5,696
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses)
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
5,845
|
|
|
$
|
589
|
|
|
$
|
432
|
|
|
$
|
328
|
|
|
$
|
3,228
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,412
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG transacts business in most major foreign currencies. The
following table summarizes the effect of changes in foreign
currency exchange rates on the growth of General Insurance net
premiums written:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Growth in original currency*
|
|
|
(5.5
|
)%
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
Foreign exchange effect
|
|
|
1.6
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Growth as reported in U.S. dollars
|
|
|
(3.9
|
)%
|
|
|
4.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Computed using a constant exchange rate for each period. |
2008
and 2007 Comparison
General Insurance reported an operating loss in 2008 compared to
operating income in 2007 due to declines in underwriting results
and net investment income as well as increased net realized
capital losses. The combined ratio for 2008 increased to 109.1,
an increase of 19.0 points compared to the same period in
2007, primarily due to an increase in the loss ratio of
11.3 points. The loss ratio for accident year 2008 recorded
in 2008 was 6.8 points higher than the loss ratio for
accident year 2007 recorded in 2007. Catastrophe-related losses
were $1.8 billion and $276 million in 2008 and 2007,
accounting for 3.4 points of the increase in the accident
year loss ratio. Increases in Mortgage Guaranty losses accounted
for 2.8 points of the increase in the 2008 accident year
loss ratio. The loss ratio also increased for other property and
casualty lines due to premium rate decreases and changes in loss
trends. Development from prior years increased incurred losses
by $155 million in 2008 and decreased incurred losses by
$606 million in 2007. The expense ratio increased primarily
due to goodwill impairment charges of $2.0 billion in
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 75
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
2008, principally attributable to goodwill arising from the
acquisitions of HSB, 21st Century, and Transatlantic as well as
the recognition of a premium deficiency reserve of
$222 million in 2008 related to UGCs second-lien
business. Also contributing to the operating loss was Personal
Lines, primarily resulting from the goodwill impairment charge
noted above.
General Insurance net premiums written declined
$1.8 billion in 2008 compared to 2007, including a decline
in U.S. workers compensation net premiums of
$1.7 billion due to declining rates, lower employment
levels and increased competition. Declining rates in other
casualty lines within Commercial Insurance and a reduction in
Personal Lines net premiums earned were largely offset by growth
in Foreign General Insurance from both established and new
distribution channels and the positive effect of changes in
foreign currency exchange rates.
See Results of Operations Consolidated Results for
further discussion on Net investment income and Realized capital
gains (losses).
2007
and 2006 Comparison
General Insurance operating income increased in 2007 compared to
2006 due to growth in net investment income, partially offset by
a decline in underwriting profit and net realized capital
losses. The 2007 combined ratio increased to 90.1, an increase
of 0.9 points compared to 2006, primarily due to an
increase in the loss ratio of 1.0 points. The loss ratio
for accident year 2007 recorded in 2007 was 2.3 points
higher than the loss ratio for accident year 2006 recorded in
2006. Increases in Mortgage Guaranty losses accounted for a
2.1 point increase in the 2007 accident year loss ratio.
The higher 2007 accident year loss ratio was partially offset by
favorable development on prior years, which reduced incurred
losses by $606 million and $53 million in 2007 and
2006, respectively. Additional favorable loss development of
$50 million (recognized in consolidation and related to
certain asbestos settlements) reduced overall incurred losses.
Commercial
Insurance Results
2008
and 2007 Comparison
Commercial Insurance operating income decreased in 2008 compared
to 2007, primarily due to significant declines in underwriting
results and net investment income, as well as significantly
greater net realized capital losses in 2008. The decline in
underwriting results is also reflected in the combined ratio,
which increased 21.6 points in 2008 compared to 2007. The
loss ratio for accident year 2008 recorded in 2008 included a
6.0 point effect related to catastrophe losses, and was
13.3 points higher than the loss ratio for accident year
2007 recorded in 2007. Prior year development and increases in
the loss reserve discount reduced incurred losses by
$169 million and $555 million in 2008 and 2007,
respectively, accounting for an additional 1.6 point increase in
the combined ratio.
Commercial Insurance net premiums written declined in 2008
compared to 2007 primarily due to declines in premiums from
workers compensation and other casualty lines. Declines in
other casualty lines were due to declining rates and reduced
activity in the construction and transportation industries.
Management and Professional liability lines declined due to
increased competition, particularly in the fourth quarter of
2008.
Commercial Insurance expense ratio increased to 26.8 in 2008
compared to 18.4 in 2007. The most significant driver of the
increase was goodwill impairment charges principally
attributable to goodwill arising from the acquisition of HSB,
representing 5.4 points of the increase in the expense
ratio. Additionally, the provision for uncollectible premiums
and other provisions increased approximately $178 million
due to economic conditions, compared to a reduction of
$18 million of expenses in 2007 as provisions established
in 2006 were released, accounting for 0.9 points of the increase
in the expense ratio. The remaining increase is due to the
decline in net premiums earned and mix of business. While AIG is
aggressively pursuing expense reductions, the impact of expense
savings will lag the decline in net written premiums.
2007
and 2006 Comparison
Commercial Insurance operating income increased in 2007 compared
to 2006 primarily due to growth in both net investment income
and underwriting profit. The improvement is also reflected in
the combined ratio, which declined 4.9 points in 2007
compared to 2006, primarily due to an improvement in the loss
ratio of 3.3 points. Catastrophe-related losses increased the
2007 loss ratio by 0.4 points. The loss ratio for accident year
2007 recorded
76 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
in 2007 was 0.9 points lower than the loss ratio recorded in
2006 for accident year 2006. The loss ratio for accident year
2006 has improved in each quarter since September 30, 2006.
As a result, the 2007 accident year loss ratio is 2.8 points
higher than the 2006 accident year loss ratio, reflecting
reductions in 2006 accident year losses recorded through
December 31, 2007. Prior year development reduced incurred
losses by $390 million in 2007 and increased incurred
losses by $175 million in 2006, accounting for 2.4 points
of the improvement in the loss ratio.
Commercial Insurance expense ratio decreased to 18.4 in 2007
compared to 20.1 in 2006, primarily due to the 2006 charge
related to the remediation of the material weakness in internal
control over certain balance sheet reconciliations that
accounted for 2.1 points of the decline. The decline was
partially offset by increases in operating expenses for
marketing initiatives and operations.
Mortgage
Guaranty Results
2008
and 2007 Comparison
Mortgage Guaranty operating loss increased in 2008 compared to
2007 due to declining housing values, increasing mortgage
foreclosures and the recognition of a premium deficiency reserve
on the second-lien business. The domestic first-lien operating
loss increased by $1.0 billion in 2008 to $1.1 billion
compared to 2007 while the second-lien operating loss of
$1.2 billion in 2008, which includes the recognition of a
$222 million premium deficiency reserve, increased
$656 million compared to 2007.
During 2008, UGC tightened underwriting standards and increased
premium rates for its first-lien business and ceased insuring
second-lien business as of September 30, 2008. During the
fourth quarter of 2008, UGC ceased insuring new private student
loan business and suspended insuring new business throughout its
European operations. All of these actions were in response to
the deteriorating market conditions and resulted in a
significant decline in new business written during the second
half of 2008.
Net premiums written declined in 2008 compared to 2007. First-
and second-lien business net premiums written grew moderately,
primarily due to increased persistency year over year. However,
new insurance written, which is a measure of the amount of new
insurance added to the portfolio, decreased 45 percent,
82 percent and 42 percent for first- and second-lien
business and international business, respectively, during 2008
compared to 2007. These declines are primarily due to UGCs
tightening of underwriting guidelines and rate increases during
the year and the actions described above.
Claims and claims adjustment expenses increased
$1.8 billion compared to 2007 primarily due to the
continuing decline in the domestic housing market. Domestic
first-lien losses incurred of $1.8 billion increased
159 percent compared to the same period in 2007 resulting
in a 2008 first-lien loss ratio of 276 compared to a 2007 loss
ratio of 122. Second-lien losses incurred of $1.2 billion
increased 61 percent compared to the same period in 2007.
UGC strengthened international loss reserves by $96 million
during the fourth quarter of 2008. Increases in both domestic
and international losses incurred resulted in an overall loss
ratio for Mortgage Guaranty (excluding the second-lien business
in run-off) of 257 in 2008 compared to 111 in 2007. UGCs
ability to cede losses to captive insurers will be reduced in
future periods primarily due to captive reinsurers exceeding the
limits of the reinsurance agreements.
Historically, Mortgage Guaranty included all mortgage insurance
risks in a single premium deficiency test because the manner of
acquiring, servicing and measuring the profitability of all
Mortgage Guaranty contracts was consistent. Due to the run-off
in the second-lien business, management no longer measures the
profitability for the second-lien business in the same manner as
that for Mortgage Guarantys ongoing businesses, and will
no longer report loss ratio or expense ratio information for the
second-lien business. As a result, UGC performs a separate
premium deficiency calculation for the second-lien business.
At December 31, 2008, the present value of expected
second-lien future losses and expenses (net of expected future
recoveries) was $1.4 billion, and was offset by the present
value of expected second-lien future premiums of
$499 million and the already established liability for
unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense of
$701 million, resulting in a premium deficiency reserve of
$222 million. The second-lien risk in force at
December 31, 2008 totaled $2.9 billion with 530
thousand second-lien policies in force compared to
$3.8 billion of risk in force and 644 thousand
policies in force at December 31, 2007. The second-lien
business is expected to run-off over the next 10 to
12 years. Risk in force represents the full amount of
second-lien loans insured reduced for contractual
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 77
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
aggregate loss limits on certain pools of loans, usually
10 percent of the full amount of loans insured in each
pool. Mortgage Guaranty may record net losses on this business
in future periods because the timing of future delinquencies may
precede recognition of future premiums in an amount in excess of
the premium deficiency reserve.
UGCs domestic mortgage risk in force totaled
$30.1 billion as of December 31, 2008 and the
60-day
delinquency ratio was 7.5 percent (based on number of
policies, consistent with mortgage industry practice) compared
to domestic mortgage risk in force of $29.8 billion and a
delinquency ratio of 3.7 percent at December 31, 2007.
Approximately 84 percent of the domestic mortgage risk is
secured by first-lien, owner-occupied properties.
2007
and 2006 Comparison
Mortgage Guaranty incurred an operating loss in 2007 compared to
operating income in 2006 as the deteriorating
U.S. residential housing market adversely affected losses
incurred for both the domestic first- and second-lien
businesses. Domestic first- and second-lien losses incurred
increased 362 percent and 346 percent respectively,
compared to 2006, resulting in loss ratios of 122.0 and 357.0,
respectively, in 2007. Increases in domestic losses incurred
resulted in an overall loss ratio of 168.6 in 2007 compared to
47.2 in 2006. Prior year development reduced incurred losses in
2007 by $25 million compared to a reduction of
$115 million in 2006, which accounted for 10.2 points of
the increase in the loss ratio.
Net premiums written increased in 2007 compared to 2006
primarily due to growth in the international markets, accounting
for 58 percent of the increase in net premiums written. In
addition, the increased use of mortgage insurance for credit
enhancement as well as better persistency resulted in an
increase in domestic first-lien premiums.
The expense ratio in 2007 was 21.2, down from 23.4 in 2006 as
premium growth offset the effect of increased expenses related
to UGCs international expansion and the employment of
additional operational resources in the second-lien business.
Foreign
General Insurance Results
2008
and 2007 Comparison
Foreign General Insurance operating income decreased in 2008
compared to 2007 due to a decrease in statutory underwriting
profit and change in DAC of $724 million, an increase in
net realized capital losses reflecting
other-than-temporary-impairment charges related to the
deterioration in the fixed income markets (see
Results of Operations Consolidated
Results-Net
Realized Gains (losses) for further discussion), and a decrease
in net investment income reflecting lower mutual fund and
partnership income related to poor performance in the equity
markets (see Results of Operations Consolidated
Results Net Investment Income for further
discussion).
Net premiums written increased 10 percent (5 percent
in original currency) in 2008 compared to 2007 due to growth in
commercial and consumer lines driven by new business from
established and new distribution channels, including the late
2007 acquisition of Württembergische und Badische
Versicherungs AG (WüBa) in Germany. New
business in the commercial lines in the U.K. and Europe and
decreases in the use of reinsurance increased net premiums
earned, but were partially offset by declines in premium rates.
Growth in personal accident business in Latin America, South
East Asia and Europe also contributed to the increase, however,
premiums from the Lloyds Syndicate Ascot continued to
decline.
The loss ratio in 2008 increased 5.1 points compared to 2007 due
to:
|
|
|
|
|
The loss ratio for accident year 2008 recorded in 2008 was 3.2
points higher than the loss ratio recorded in 2007 for accident
year 2007 primarily due to continued rate erosion and increased
lower level claims frequency.
|
|
|
|
Loss development on prior accident years increased the loss
ratio by 1.9 points.
|
78 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
2007
and 2006 Comparison
Foreign General Insurance operating income decreased in 2007
compared to 2006, due primarily to decreases in net investment
income and statutory underwriting profit. Net investment income
in 2006 included income of $424 million from unit
investment trusts (UCITS) adjustments. Underwriting profit
decreased due to losses from the June 2007 U.K. floods, an
increase in severe but non-catastrophic losses and higher
frequency of non-severe losses compared to 2006, partially
offset by higher favorable loss development on prior accident
years.
Net premiums written increased 14 percent (10 percent
in original currency) in 2007 compared to 2006, reflecting
growth in commercial and consumer lines driven by new business
from both established and new distribution channels, including
Central Insurance Co. Ltd. in Taiwan acquired in late 2006. Net
premiums written for commercial lines increased due to new
business in the U.K. and Europe and decreases in the use of
reinsurance, partially offset by declines in premium rates.
Growth in consumer lines in Latin America, Asia and Europe also
contributed to the increase. Net premiums written for the
Lloyds syndicate Ascot (Ascot) and Aviation declined due
to rate decreases and increased market competition.
The 2007 loss ratio increased a total of 1.7 points compared to
2006. Losses of $90 million from the June 2007 U.K. floods
added 0.7 points to the loss ratio and higher severe but
non-catastrophic losses and higher loss frequency for personal
accident business in Japan and personal lines business in Asia
and Latin America added 1.6 points to the loss ratio. Partially
offsetting these increases was favorable loss development on
prior accident years of $286 million in 2007 compared to
$183 million in 2006, which decreased the loss ratio by 0.6
points.
The 2007 expense ratio increased 1.3 points compared to 2006.
This increase reflected the cost of realigning certain legal
entities through which Foreign General Insurance operates and
the increased significance of consumer lines of business, which
have higher acquisition costs. These factors contributed 0.7
points to the 2007 expense ratio.
Liability
for unpaid claims and claims adjustment
expense
The following table presents the components of the General
Insurance gross liability for unpaid claims and claims
adjustment expense (loss reserves) by major lines of business on
a statutory annual statement basis:*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Other liability occurrence
|
|
$
|
19,773
|
|
|
$
|
20,580
|
|
Workers compensation
|
|
|
15,170
|
|
|
|
15,568
|
|
Other liability claims made
|
|
|
13,189
|
|
|
|
13,878
|
|
International
|
|
|
11,786
|
|
|
|
7,036
|
|
Auto liability
|
|
|
5,593
|
|
|
|
6,068
|
|
Property
|
|
|
5,201
|
|
|
|
4,274
|
|
Mortgage guaranty/credit
|
|
|
3,137
|
|
|
|
1,426
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
3,102
|
|
|
|
3,127
|
|
Products liability
|
|
|
2,400
|
|
|
|
2,416
|
|
Medical malpractice
|
|
|
2,210
|
|
|
|
2,361
|
|
Aircraft
|
|
|
1,693
|
|
|
|
1,623
|
|
Accident and health
|
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
|
1,818
|
|
Commercial multiple peril
|
|
|
1,163
|
|
|
|
1,900
|
|
Fidelity/surety
|
|
|
1,028
|
|
|
|
1,222
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,362
|
|
|
|
2,203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
89,258
|
|
|
$
|
85,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Presented by lines of business pursuant to statutory
reporting requirements as prescribed by the National Association
of Insurance Commissioners. |
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 79
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Reserves for
non-U.S. domiciled
companies are carried in the International line of business. As
a result of restructuring of certain foreign operations in 2008,
reserves for the International line of business included amounts
formerly reported in other lines of business.
AIGs gross liability for unpaid claims and claims
adjustment expense represents the accumulation of estimates of
ultimate losses, including estimates for incurred but not yet
reported reserves (IBNR) and loss expenses. The methods used to
determine loss reserve estimates and to establish the resulting
reserves are continually reviewed and updated. Any adjustments
resulting therefrom are currently reflected in operating income.
Because loss reserve estimates are subject to the outcome of
future events, changes in estimates are unavoidable given that
loss trends vary and time is often required for changes in
trends to be recognized and confirmed. Reserve changes that
increase previous estimates of ultimate cost are referred to as
unfavorable or adverse development or reserve strengthening.
Reserve changes that decrease previous estimates of ultimate
cost are referred to as favorable development.
Estimates for mortgage guaranty insurance losses and loss
adjustment expense reserves are based on notices of mortgage
loan delinquencies and estimates of delinquencies that have been
incurred but have not been reported by loan servicers, based
upon historical reporting trends. Mortgage Guaranty establishes
reserves using a percentage of the contractual liability (for
each delinquent loan reported) that is based upon past
experience regarding certain loan factors such as age of the
delinquency, cure rates, dollar amount of the loan and type of
mortgage loan. Because mortgage delinquencies and claims
payments are affected primarily by macroeconomic events, such as
changes in home price appreciation or depreciation, interest
rates and unemployment, the determination of the ultimate loss
cost requires a high degree of judgment. AIG believes it has
provided appropriate reserves for currently delinquent loans.
Consistent with industry practice, AIG does not establish a
reserve for insured loans that are not currently delinquent, but
that may become delinquent in future periods.
At December 31, 2008, General Insurance net loss reserves
increased $3.17 billion from 2007 to $72.46 billion.
The net loss reserves represent loss reserves reduced by
reinsurance recoverable, net of an allowance for unrecoverable
reinsurance and applicable discount for future investment income.
The following table classifies the components of the General
Insurance net liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment
expense by business unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Commercial Insurance
|
|
$
|
48,789
|
|
|
$
|
47,392
|
|
Transatlantic
|
|
|
7,349
|
|
|
|
6,900
|
|
Personal Lines
|
|
|
2,460
|
|
|
|
2,417
|
|
Mortgage Guaranty
|
|
|
3,004
|
|
|
|
1,339
|
|
Foreign General Insurance
|
|
|
10,853
|
|
|
|
11,240
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net loss reserves
|
|
$
|
72,455
|
|
|
$
|
69,288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discounting
of Reserves
At December 31, 2008, AIGs overall General Insurance
net loss reserves reflect a loss reserve discount of
$2.57 billion, including tabular and non-tabular
calculations. The tabular workers compensation discount is
calculated using a 3.5 percent interest rate and the
1979-81
Decennial Mortality Table. The non-tabular workers
compensation discount is calculated separately for companies
domiciled in New York and Pennsylvania, and follows the
statutory regulations for each state. For New York companies,
the discount is based on a five percent interest rate and the
companies own payout patterns. For Pennsylvania companies,
the statute has specified discount factors for accident years
2001 and prior, which are based on a six percent interest rate
and an industry payout pattern. For accident years 2002 and
subsequent, the discount is based on the payout patterns and
investment yields of the companies. Certain other liability
occurrence and products liability occurrence business in AIRCO
that was written by Commercial Insurance is discounted based on
the yield of United States Department of the Treasury securities
ranging from one to twenty years and the Commercial Insurance
payout pattern for this business. The discount is comprised of
the following: $733 million tabular discount
for workers compensation in Commercial
80 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Insurance; $1.67 billion non-tabular discount
for workers compensation in Commercial Insurance; and,
$170 million non-tabular discount for other
liability occurrence and products liability occurrence in AIRCO
for Commercial Insurance business. Since 1998 AIRCO has assumed
on a quota share basis certain general liability and products
liability business written by Commercial Insurance, and the
reserves for this business are carried on a discounted basis by
AIRCO.
Results
of the Reserving Process
AIG believes that the General Insurance net loss reserves are
adequate to cover General Insurance net losses and loss expenses
as of December 31, 2008. While AIG regularly reviews the
adequacy of established loss reserves, there can be no assurance
that AIGs ultimate loss reserves will not develop
adversely and materially exceed AIGs loss reserves as of
December 31, 2008. In the opinion of management, such
adverse development and resulting increase in reserves is not
likely to have a material adverse effect on AIGs
consolidated financial condition, although it could have a
material adverse effect on AIGs consolidated results of
operations for an individual reporting period. See Item 1A.
Risk Factors Casualty Insurance and Underwriting
Reserves.
The following table presents the reconciliation of net loss
reserves:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense at
beginning of year
|
|
$
|
69,288
|
|
|
$
|
62,630
|
|
|
$
|
57,476
|
|
Foreign exchange effect
|
|
|
(2,113
|
)
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
Acquisitions and dispositions(a)
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expenses incurred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year
|
|
|
35,085
|
|
|
|
30,261
|
|
|
|
27,805
|
|
Prior years, other than accretion of discount(b)
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
(656
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Prior years, accretion of discount
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expenses incurred
|
|
|
35,520
|
|
|
|
29,932
|
|
|
|
28,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expenses paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year
|
|
|
13,440
|
|
|
|
9,684
|
|
|
|
8,368
|
|
Prior years
|
|
|
16,531
|
|
|
|
14,862
|
|
|
|
15,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expenses paid
|
|
|
29,971
|
|
|
|
24,546
|
|
|
|
23,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense at
end of year
|
|
$
|
72,455
|
|
|
$
|
69,288
|
|
|
$
|
62,630
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Reflects the closing balance with respect to Unibanco
divested in the fourth quarter of 2008 and the opening balance
with respect to the acquisitions of WüBa and the Central
Insurance Co., Ltd. in 2007 and 2006, respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes $88 million and $181 million in 2007 and
2006, respectively, for the general reinsurance operations of
Transatlantic and, $7 million, $64 million and
$103 million of losses incurred in 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, resulting from 2005 and 2004 catastrophes. |
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 81
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
The following tables summarize development, (favorable) or
unfavorable, of incurred losses and loss expenses for prior
years (other than accretion of discount):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Prior Accident Year Development by Reporting Unit:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Insurance
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
(390
|
)
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
Personal Lines
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(111
|
)
|
Mortgage Guaranty
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
Foreign General Insurance
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(286
|
)
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
(694
|
)
|
|
|
(234
|
)
|
Transatlantic
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Asbestos settlements*
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior years, other than accretion of discount
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
(656
|
)
|
|
$
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents the effect of settlements of certain asbestos
liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Prior Accident Year Development by Major Class of Business:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess casualty (Commercial Insurance)
|
|
$
|
1,105
|
|
|
$
|
73
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
D&O and related management liability (Commercial Insurance)
|
|
|
(430
|
)
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Excess workers compensation (Commercial Insurance)
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
74
|
|
Healthcare (Commercial insurance)
|
|
|
(310
|
)
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
(130
|
)
|
Reinsurance (Transatlantic)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
181
|
|
Asbestos and environmental (primarily Commercial Insurance)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
All other, net
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
(468
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior years, other than accretion of discount
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
(656
|
)
|
|
$
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Calendar Year
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Prior Accident Year Development by Accident Year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accident Year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
$
|
(370
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(590
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,248
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
(455
|
)
|
|
|
(446
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,576
|
)
|
2004
|
|
|
(335
|
)
|
|
|
(428
|
)
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
2003
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
(212
|
)
|
2002
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
373
|
|
2001
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
2000
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
1999
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
382
|
|
1998 and prior
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior years, other than accretion of discount
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
(656
|
)
|
|
$
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
In determining the loss development from prior accident years,
AIG conducts analyses to determine the change in estimated
ultimate loss for each accident year for each profit center. For
example, if loss emergence for a profit center is different than
expected for certain accident years, the actuaries examine the
indicated effect such emergence would have on the reserves of
that profit center. In some cases, the higher or lower than
expected emergence may result in no clear change in the ultimate
loss estimate for the accident years in question, and no
adjustment would be made to the profit centers reserves
for prior accident years. In other cases, the higher or lower
than expected emergence may result in a larger change, either
favorable or unfavorable, than the difference between the actual
and expected loss emergence. Such additional analyses were
conducted for each profit center, as appropriate, in 2008 to
determine the loss development from prior accident years for
2008. As part of its reserving process, AIG also considers
notices of claims received with respect to emerging issues, such
as those related to the U.S. mortgage and housing market.
2008
Net Loss Development
In 2008, net loss development from prior accident years was
adverse by approximately $118 million, including
approximately $339 million of favorable development
relating to loss sensitive business in the first three months of
2008 (which was offset by an equal amount of negative earned
premium development), and excluding approximately
$317 million from accretion of loss reserve discount.
Excluding both the favorable development relating to loss
sensitive business and accretion of loss reserve discount, net
loss development from prior accident years in 2008 was adverse
by approximately $457 million. The overall adverse
development of $118 million consisted of approximately
$1.75 billion of favorable development from accident years
2004 through 2007 offset by approximately $1.87 billion of
adverse loss development from accident years 2003 and prior. The
adverse development from accident years 2003 and prior was
primarily related to excess casualty business within Commercial
Insurance; this business accounted for approximately
$1.25 billion of the adverse development from accident
years 2003 and prior. The favorable development from accident
years 2004 through 2007 included approximately $590 million
in favorable development from business written by Lexington
Insurance Company, including healthcare, catastrophic casualty,
casualty and program businesses. Financial Services divisions
within Commercial Insurance, including D&O and related
management liability business, contributed approximately
$430 million to the favorable development from accident
years 2004 through 2007, relating primarily to D&O, and
related management liability business from accident years 2004
and 2005. The adverse development from accident years 2003 and
prior included approximately $200 million related to claims
involving MTBE, a gasoline additive, primarily on excess
casualty business within Commercial Insurance from accident
years 2000 and prior. In addition, the excess casualty adverse
development reflect continued emergence of latent claims such as
construction defect, product aggregate, and pharmaceutical
related exposures, as well as higher than expected large loss
activity from these accident years. AIGs exposure to these
latent exposures was reduced after 2002 due to significant
changes in policy terms and conditions as well as underwriting
guidelines. (See Net Loss Development by Class of Business
below). Other segments throughout AIG also contributed to the
adverse development from accident year 2003 and prior, including
approximately $215 million relating to Transatlantic.
Mortgage Guaranty contributed approximately $177 million of
overall adverse development in 2008, with $159 million
relating to accident year 2007. See Year-to-Date Mortgage
Guaranty Results 2008 and 2007 Comparison above.
2007
Net Loss Development
In 2007, net loss development from prior accident years was
favorable by approximately $656 million, including
approximately $88 million of adverse development from
Transatlantic; and excluding approximately $327 million
from accretion of loss reserve discount. Excluding
Transatlantic, as well as accretion of discount, net loss
development in 2007 from prior accident years was favorable by
approximately $744 million. The overall favorable
development of $656 million consisted of approximately
$2.12 billion of favorable development from accident years
2004 through 2006, partially offset by approximately
$1.43 billion of adverse development from accident years
2002 and prior and $37 million of adverse development from
accident year 2003. In 2007, most classes of AIGs business
continued to experience favorable development for accident years
2004 through 2006. The majority of the adverse development from
accident years 2002 and prior was related to development from
excess casualty and primary workers compensation business
within Commercial Insurance and from Transatlantic. The
development from accident year 2003 was primarily related to
adverse development from excess casualty and primary
workers compensation business within Commercial Insurance
offset by favorable development from most
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 83
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
other classes of business. The overall favorable development of
$656 million included approximately $305 million
pertaining to the D&O and related management liability
classes of business within Commercial Insurance, consisting of
approximately $335 million of favorable development from
accident years 2003 through 2006, partially offset by
approximately $30 million of adverse development from
accident years 2002 and prior. The overall favorable development
of $656 million also included approximately
$300 million of adverse development from primary
workers compensation business within Commercial Insurance.
2006
Net Loss Development
In 2006, net loss development from prior accident years was
favorable by approximately $53 million, including
approximately $198 million in net adverse development from
asbestos and environmental reserves resulting from the updated
ground-up analysis of these exposures in the fourth quarter of
2006; approximately $103 million of adverse development
pertaining to the major hurricanes in 2004 and 2005; and
$181 million of adverse development from Transatlantic; and
excluding approximately $300 million from accretion of loss
reserve discount. Excluding the fourth quarter asbestos and
environmental reserve increase, catastrophes and Transatlantic,
as well as accretion of discount, net loss development in 2006
from prior accident years was favorable by approximately
$535 million. The overall favorable development of
$53 million consisted of approximately $2.30 billion
of favorable development from accident years 2003 through 2005,
partially offset by approximately $2.25 billion of adverse
development from accident years 2002 and prior. In 2006, most
classes of AIGs business continued to experience favorable
development for accident years 2003 through 2005. The adverse
development from accident years 2002 and prior reflected
development from excess casualty, workers compensation,
excess workers compensation, and post-1986 environmental
liability classes of business, all within Commercial Insurance,
from asbestos reserves within Commercial Insurance and Foreign
General Insurance, and from Transatlantic.
Net
Loss Development by Class of Business
The following is a discussion of the primary reasons for the
development in 2008, 2007 and 2006 for those classes of business
that experienced significant prior accident year developments
during the three-year period. See Asbestos and Environmental
Reserves below for a further discussion of asbestos and
environmental reserves and development.
Excess Casualty: Excess Casualty reserves
experienced significant adverse loss development in 2008,
following relatively minor adverse development in 2006 and 2007.
However, all three years exhibited significant adverse
development from accident years 2002 and prior. The increase in
loss costs resulted primarily from medical inflation, which
increased the economic loss component of tort claims, advances
in medical care, which extended the life span of severely
injured claimants, and larger jury verdicts, which increased the
value of severe tort claims. An additional factor affecting
AIGs excess casualty experience in recent years has been
the exhaustion of underlying primary policies for products
liability coverage and for homebuilders. This has led to
increased loss emergence relating to claims involving exhaustion
of underlying product aggregates and increased construction
defect-related claims activity on AIGs excess and umbrella
policies. Many excess casualty policies were written on a
multi-year basis in the late 1990s, which limited AIGs
ability to respond to emerging market trends as rapidly as would
otherwise be the case. In subsequent years, AIG responded to
these emerging trends by increasing rates and implementing
numerous policy form and coverage changes. This led to a
significant improvement in experience beginning with accident
year 2001. In 2007 and 2008, a significant portion of the
adverse development from accident years 2002 and prior also
related to latent exposures, including pharmaceutical exposures
as well as the construction defect and product aggregate related
exposures noted above. AIGs exposure to these latent
exposures was sharply reduced after 2002 due to significant
changes in policy terms and conditions as well as underwriting
guidelines. Another contributor to the adverse development
during 2006 through 2008 is that actual loss development for
other large losses for accident years 1998 and subsequent have
emerged at higher than expected levels as compared to the loss
emergence pattern exhibited from earlier accident years. This
has caused significant additional development for accident years
1998 to 2002, and to a lesser extent 2003. In 2008, this
phenomenon also caused some adverse development for accident
year 2004; however the accident year results for accident years
2003 and 2004 both remain very favorable.
For the year-end 2007 loss reserve review, AIG claims staff
updated its review of accounts with significant exposure to
construction defect-related claims. AIGs actuaries
determined that no significant changes in the
84 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
assumptions were required. Prior accident year loss development
in 2007 was adverse by approximately $75 million, a minor
amount for this class of business. However, AIG continued to
experience adverse development in this class for accident years
2002 and prior, amounting to approximately $450 million in
2007. In addition, loss reserves developed adversely for
accident year 2003 by approximately $100 million in 2007
for this class. The loss ratio for accident year 2003 remained
very favorable for this class and had been relatively stable
over the past several years. Favorable development in 2007 for
accident years 2004 through 2006 largely offset the adverse
development from accident years 2003 and prior. A significant
portion of the adverse development from accident years 2002 and
prior related to the latent exposures described above.
For the year-end 2006 loss reserve review, AIG claims staff
updated the separate review for accounts with significant
exposure to construction defect-related claims in order to
assist the actuaries in determining the proper reserve for this
exposure. AIGs actuaries determined that no significant
changes in the assumptions were required. Prior accident year
loss development in 2006 was adverse by approximately
$100 million, a relatively minor amount for this class of
business. However, AIG continued to experience adverse
development for this class for accident years prior to 2003.
For the year-end 2008 loss reserve review, AIG claims staff
again updated its review of accounts with significant exposure
to construction defect-related claims. In response to the
continued upward developments on these claims, and based on an
updated analysis of this development, AIG increased the reserves
by an additional $75 million beyond the increases
identified in the claims review. In response to the continued
adverse development of product aggregate related claims during
2007 and 2008, AIGs actuaries conducted a special analysis
of product aggregate-related claims development, resulting in an
increase in the IBNR reserve for this exposure of
$175 million. In response to the high level of
pharmaceutical related claim emergence during 2007 and 2008, AIG
claims staff reviewed the remaining exposure, and based on this
review an additional reserve of $10 million was
established. In response to the much greater than expected
actual loss emergence for other large losses for accident years
1998 and subsequent during 2007 and 2008, AIGs actuaries
increased the loss development factor assumptions for this
business, resulting in a further increase of approximately
$200 million in loss reserves for this class. In total, the
specific increases in reserves related to these items increased
the excess casualty reserves by approximately $460 million
during 2008, of which $370 million was recognized in
AIGs fourth quarter 2008 results. In the first three
months of 2008, AIG also recognized approximately
$200 million of losses relating to MTBE, a gasoline
additive, which primarily related to excess casualty business
from accident years 2000 and prior. While the various
adjustments described above were intended to respond
appropriately to the recent adverse trends in loss experience,
excess casualty remains a highly volatile class of business and
there cannot be any assurance that further adjustments to
assumptions in the loss reserve process for this class of
business will not be necessary.
Loss reserves pertaining to the excess casualty class of
business are generally included in the other liability
occurrence line of business, with a small portion of the excess
casualty reserves included in the other liability claims made
line of business, as presented in the table above.
D&O and Related Management Liability Classes of
Business: AIG experienced an insignificant amount
of favorable development in 2006 for the D&O and related
management liability class of business, followed by significant
favorable development during 2007 and 2008. The favorable
development throughout the three-year period related primarily
to accident years 2004 and 2005, and to a lesser extent accident
years 2003 and 2006. Loss cost trends for D&O and related
management liability classes of business were adverse in
accident years 2002 and prior due to a variety of factors,
including an increase in frequency and severity of corporate
bankruptcies; the increase in the frequency of financial
restatements; the sharp rise in market capitalization of
publicly traded companies; and the increase in the number of
initial public offerings. The 2003 through 2006 period was
marked by a significant reduction in claims related to these
factors; thus the expected loss ratios initially established for
these accident years have developed favorably, particularly for
2004 and 2005. Beginning in accident year 2007, claims relating
to the credit crisis have resulted in increased overall claim
activity, and accident year 2007 reserves developed adversely by
a relatively insignificant amount during 2008. AIG utilizes
ground up claims projections by AIG claims staff as a benchmark
to select the loss reserves for this business; these projections
are updated annually.
For the year-end 2008 loss reserve review, AIGs actuaries
took into account the continued favorable loss emergence for
accident years 2006 and prior. They determined that, in order to
respond to the significant favorable loss emergence during 2007
and 2008, greater weight should be applied to the improving loss
experience for
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 85
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
accident years 2006 and prior. Loss reserve selections therefore
gave increased weight to the improved experience and less weight
to the ground-up claim projections for these accident years, as
the experience has continued to improve relative to the claim
benchmark that was originally established for these accident
years. For accident year 2007, the claim projections include
claims relating to the credit crisis. The recognition of these
projections resulted in a significant increase in loss reserves
for some D&O subclasses. However this was partially offset
by favorable loss development for other subclasses that were
significantly less affected by the credit crisis. The overall
development for accident year 2007 was thus only a modest
increase in loss reserves. The reserves established for accident
year 2008 reflect AIGs expectation of increased claim
activity relating to the credit crisis. Given the uncertainty of
the ultimate development from claims relating to the credit
crisis in accident years 2007 and 2008, there is a greater than
normal potential variation in the loss ratios for these accident
years. The increased responsiveness to the improving loss trends
for accident years 2006 and prior resulted in approximately
$225 million of favorable loss development in the fourth
quarter of 2008 for this business, primarily in accident years
2004 and 2005.
For the year-end 2007 loss reserve review, AIGs actuaries
determined that no significant changes in the assumptions were
required. Prior accident year reserve development in 2007 was
favorable by approximately $305 million, due primarily to
favorable development from accident years 2004 and 2005, and to
a lesser extent 2003 and 2006. AIGs actuaries continued to
benchmark the loss reserve indications to the
ground-up
claim projections provided by AIG claims staff for this class of
business. For the year-end 2007 loss reserve review, the
ground-up
claim projections included all accident years through 2006, and
included stock options backdating-related exposures from
accident year 2006.
For the year-end 2006 loss reserve review, AIGs actuaries
determined that no significant changes in the assumptions were
required. Prior accident year loss development in 2006 was
favorable by approximately $20 million, an insignificant
amount for these classes. AIGs actuaries continued to
benchmark the loss reserve indications to the
ground-up
claim projections provided by AIG claims staff for this class of
business. For the year-end 2006 loss reserve review, the
ground-up
claim projections included all accident years through 2005.
Loss reserves pertaining to D&O and related management
liability classes of business are included in the other
liability claims made line of business, as presented in the
table above.
Healthcare: Healthcare business written by
Commercial Insurance produced moderate favorable development in
2006 and 2007 and significant favorable development in 2008.
Healthcare loss reserves have benefited from favorable market
conditions and an improved legal environment in accident years
2002 and subsequent, following a period of adverse loss trends
and market conditions that began in the mid 1990s. For the
year-end 2008 loss reserve review, AIGs actuaries
responded to the consistently favorable experience observed
during the latest three years by utilizing more responsive
assumptions relating to loss development factors, loss trend
factors, and expected loss ratios for this business. These
modified assumptions resulted in approximately $140 million
of additional favorable development that was recognized in the
fourth quarter of 2008 for this business.
Overview
of Loss Reserving Process
The General Insurance loss reserves can generally be categorized
into two distinct groups. One group is short-tail classes of
business consisting principally of property, personal lines and
certain casualty classes. The other group is long-tail casualty
classes of business which includes excess and umbrella
liability, D&O, professional liability, medical
malpractice, workers compensation, general liability,
products liability and related classes.
Short-Tail
Reserves
For operations writing short-tail coverages, such as property
coverages, the process of recording quarterly loss reserves is
generally geared toward maintaining an appropriate reserve for
the outstanding exposure, rather than determining an expected
loss ratio for current business. For example, the IBNR reserve
required for a class of property business might be expected to
approximate 20 percent of the latest years earned
premiums, and this level of reserve would generally be
maintained regardless of the loss ratio emerging in the current
quarter. The 20 percent factor would be adjusted to reflect
changes in rate levels, loss reporting patterns, known exposure
to unreported losses, or other factors affecting the particular
class of business.
86 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Long-Tail
Reserves
Estimation of ultimate net losses and loss expenses (net losses)
for long-tail casualty classes of business is a complex process
and depends on a number of factors, including the class and
volume of business involved. Experience in the more recent
accident years of long-tail casualty classes of business shows
limited statistical credibility in reported net losses because a
relatively low proportion of net losses would be reported claims
and expenses and an even smaller percentage would be net losses
paid. Therefore, IBNR would constitute a relatively high
proportion of net losses.
AIGs carried net long-tail loss reserves are tested using
loss trend factors that AIG considers appropriate for each class
of business. A variety of actuarial methods and assumptions is
normally employed to estimate net losses for long-tail casualty
classes of businesses. These methods ordinarily involve the use
of loss trend factors intended to reflect the annual growth in
loss costs from one accident year to the next. For the majority
of long-tail casualty classes of business, net loss trend
factors approximated five percent. Loss trend factors reflect
many items including changes in claims handling, exposure and
policy forms, current and future estimates of monetary inflation
and social inflation and increases in litigation and awards.
These factors are periodically reviewed and adjusted, as
appropriate, to reflect emerging trends which are based upon
past loss experience. Thus, many factors are implicitly
considered in estimating the year to year growth in loss costs.
A number of actuarial assumptions are generally made in the
review of reserves for each class of business. For longer-tail
classes of business, actuarial assumptions generally are made
with respect to the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Loss trend factors which are used to establish expected loss
ratios for subsequent accident years based on the projected loss
ratio for prior accident years.
|
|
|
|
Expected loss ratios for the latest accident year (i.e.,
accident year 2008 for the year-end 2008 loss reserve analysis)
and, in some cases for accident years prior to the latest
accident year. The expected loss ratio generally reflects the
projected loss ratio from prior accident years, adjusted for the
loss trend (see above) and the effect of rate changes and other
quantifiable factors on the loss ratio. For low-frequency,
high-severity classes such as excess casualty, expected loss
ratios generally are used for at least the three most recent
accident years.
|
|
|
|
Loss development factors which are used to project the reported
losses for each accident year to an ultimate basis. Generally,
the actual loss development factors observed from prior accident
years would be used as a basis to determine the loss development
factors for the subsequent accident years.
|
AIG records quarterly changes in loss reserves for each of its
many General Insurance classes of business. The overall change
in AIGs loss reserves is based on the sum of these classes
of business changes. For most long-tail classes of business, the
process of recording quarterly loss reserve changes involves
determining the estimated current loss ratio for each class of
coverage. This loss ratio is multiplied by the current
quarters net earned premium for that class of coverage to
determine the current accident quarters total estimated
net incurred loss and loss expense. The change in loss reserves
for the quarter for each class is thus the difference between
the net incurred loss and loss expense, estimated as described
above, and the net paid losses and loss expenses in the quarter.
Also any change in estimated ultimate losses from prior accident
years, either positive or negative, is reflected in the loss
reserve for the current quarter.
Details
of the Loss Reserving Process
The process of determining the current loss ratio for each class
of business is based on a variety of factors. These include, but
are not limited to, the following considerations: prior accident
year and policy year loss ratios; rate changes; changes in
coverage, reinsurance, or mix of business; and actual and
anticipated changes in external factors affecting results, such
as trends in loss costs or in the legal and claims environment.
The current loss ratio for each class of business reflects input
from actuarial, underwriting and claims staff and is intended to
represent managements best estimate of the current loss
ratio after reflecting all of the factors described above. At
the close of each quarter, the assumptions underlying the loss
ratios are reviewed to determine if the loss ratios remain
appropriate. This process includes a review of the actual claims
experience in the quarter, actual rate changes achieved, actual
changes in coverage, reinsurance or mix of business, and changes
in certain other factors that may
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 87
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
affect the loss ratio. When this review suggests that the
initially determined loss ratio is no longer appropriate, the
loss ratio for current business is changed to reflect the
revised assumptions.
A comprehensive annual loss reserve review is completed in the
fourth quarter of each year for each AIG general insurance
subsidiary. These reviews are conducted in full detail for each
class of business for each subsidiary, and thus consist of
hundreds of individual analyses. The purpose of these reviews is
to confirm the appropriateness of the reserves carried by each
of the individual subsidiaries, and therefore of AIGs
overall carried reserves. The reserve analysis for each class of
business is performed by the actuarial personnel who are most
familiar with that class of business. In completing these
detailed actuarial reserve analyses, the actuaries are required
to make numerous assumptions, including the selection of loss
development factors and loss cost trend factors. They are also
required to determine and select the most appropriate actuarial
methods to employ for each business class. Additionally, they
must determine the appropriate segmentation of data from which
the adequacy of the reserves can be most accurately tested. In
the course of these detailed reserve reviews a point estimate of
the loss reserve is determined. The sum of these point estimates
for each class of business for each subsidiary provides an
overall actuarial point estimate of the loss reserve for that
subsidiary. The ultimate process by which the actual carried
reserves are determined considers both the actuarial point
estimate and numerous other internal and external factors
including a qualitative assessment of inflation and other
economic conditions in the United States and abroad, changes in
the legal, regulatory, judicial and social environment,
underlying policy pricing, terms and conditions, and claims
handling. Loss reserve development can also be affected by
commutations of assumed and ceded reinsurance agreements.
Actuarial
Methods for Major Classes of Business
In testing the reserves for each class of business, a
determination is made by AIGs actuaries as to the most
appropriate actuarial methods. This determination is based on a
variety of factors including the nature of the claims associated
with the class of business, such as frequency or severity. Other
factors considered include the loss development characteristics
associated with the claims, the volume of claim data available
for the applicable class, and the applicability of various
actuarial methods to the class. In addition to determining the
actuarial methods, the actuaries determine the appropriate loss
reserve groupings of data. For example, AIG writes a great
number of unique subclasses of professional liability. For
pricing or other purposes, it is appropriate to evaluate the
profitability of each subclass individually. However, for
purposes of estimating the loss reserves for professional
liability, it is appropriate to combine the subclasses into
larger groups. The greater degree of credibility in the claims
experience of the larger groups may outweigh the greater degree
of homogeneity of the individual subclasses. This determination
of data segmentation and actuarial methods is carefully
considered for each class of business. The segmentation and
actuarial methods chosen are those which together are expected
to produce the most accurate estimate of the loss reserves.
Actuarial methods used by AIG for most long-tail casualty
classes of business include loss development methods and
expected loss ratio methods, including Bornhuetter
Ferguson methods described below. Other methods considered
include frequency/severity methods, although these are generally
used by AIG more for pricing analysis than for loss reserve
analysis. Loss development methods utilize the actual loss
development patterns from prior accident years to project the
reported losses to an ultimate basis for subsequent accident
years. Loss development methods generally are most appropriate
for classes of business which exhibit a stable pattern of loss
development from one accident year to the next, and for which
the components of the classes have similar development
characteristics. For example, property exposures would generally
not be combined into the same class as casualty exposures, and
primary casualty exposures would generally not be combined into
the same class as excess casualty exposures. Expected loss ratio
methods are generally utilized by AIG where the reported loss
data lacks sufficient credibility to utilize loss development
methods, such as for new classes of business or for long-tail
classes at early stages of loss development.
Expected loss ratio methods rely on the application of an
expected loss ratio to the earned premium for the class of
business to determine the loss reserves. For example, an
expected loss ratio of 70 percent applied to an earned
premium base of $10 million for a class of business would
generate an ultimate loss estimate of $7 million.
Subtracting any reported paid losses and loss expense would
result in the indicated loss reserve for this class.
Bornhuetter Ferguson methods are expected loss ratio
methods for which the expected loss ratio is applied only to the
expected unreported portion of the losses. For example, for a
long-tail class of business for which only
88 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
10 percent of the losses are expected to be reported at the
end of the accident year, the expected loss ratio would be
applied to the 90 percent of the losses still unreported.
The actual reported losses at the end of the accident year would
be added to determine the total ultimate loss estimate for the
accident year. Subtracting the reported paid losses and loss
expenses would result in the indicated loss reserve. In the
example above, the expected loss ratio of 70 percent would
be multiplied by 90 percent. The result of 63 percent
would be applied to the earned premium of $10 million
resulting in an estimated unreported loss of $6.3 million.
Actual reported losses would be added to arrive at the total
ultimate losses. If the reported losses were $1 million,
the ultimate loss estimate under the Bornhuetter
Ferguson method would be $7.3 million versus the
$7 million amount under the expected loss ratio method
described above. Thus, the Bornhuetter Ferguson
method gives partial credibility to the actual loss experience
to date for the class of business. Loss development methods
generally give full credibility to the reported loss experience
to date. In the example above, loss development methods would
typically indicate an ultimate loss estimate of
$10 million, as the reported losses of $1 million
would be estimated to reflect only 10 percent of the
ultimate losses.
A key advantage of loss development methods is that they respond
quickly to any actual changes in loss costs for the class of
business. Therefore, if loss experience is unexpectedly
deteriorating or improving, the loss development method gives
full credibility to the changing experience. Expected loss ratio
methods would be slower to respond to the change, as they would
continue to give more weight to the expected loss ratio, until
enough evidence emerged for the expected loss ratio to be
modified to reflect the changing loss experience. On the other
hand, loss development methods have the disadvantage of
overreacting to changes in reported losses if in fact the loss
experience is not credible. For example, the presence or absence
of large losses at the early stages of loss development could
cause the loss development method to overreact to the favorable
or unfavorable experience by assuming it will continue at later
stages of development. In these instances, expected loss ratio
methods such as Bornhuetter Ferguson have the
advantage of properly recognizing large losses without
extrapolating unusual large loss activity onto the unreported
portion of the losses for the accident year. AIGs loss
reserve reviews for long-tail classes typically utilize a
combination of both loss development and expected loss ratio
methods. Loss development methods are generally given more
weight for accident years and classes of business where the loss
experience is highly credible. Expected loss ratio methods are
given more weight where the reported loss experience is less
credible, or is driven more by large losses. Expected loss ratio
methods require sufficient information to determine the
appropriate expected loss ratio. This information generally
includes the actual loss ratios for prior accident years, and
rate changes as well as underwriting or other changes which
would affect the loss ratio. Further, an estimate of the loss
cost trend or loss ratio trend is required in order to allow for
the effect of inflation and other factors which may increase or
otherwise change the loss costs from one accident year to the
next.
Frequency/severity methods generally rely on the determination
of an ultimate number of claims and an average severity for each
claim for each accident year. Multiplying the estimated ultimate
number of claims for each accident year by the expected average
severity of each claim produces the estimated ultimate loss for
the accident year. Frequency/severity methods generally require
a sufficient volume of claims in order for the average severity
to be predictable. Average severity for subsequent accident
years is generally determined by applying an estimated annual
loss cost trend to the estimated average claim severity from
prior accident years. Frequency/severity methods have the
advantage that ultimate claim counts can generally be estimated
more quickly and accurately than can ultimate losses. Thus, if
the average claim severity can be accurately estimated, these
methods can more quickly respond to changes in loss experience
than other methods. However, for average severity to be
predictable, the class of business must consist of homogeneous
types of claims for which loss severity trends from one year to
the next are reasonably consistent. Generally these methods work
best for high frequency, low severity classes of business such
as personal auto. AIG also utilizes these methods in pricing
subclasses of professional liability. However, AIG does not
generally utilize frequency/severity methods to test loss
reserves, due to the general nature of AIGs reserves being
applicable to lower frequency, higher severity commercial
classes of business where average claim severity is volatile.
Excess Casualty: AIG generally uses a
combination of loss development methods and expected loss ratio
methods for excess casualty classes. Expected loss ratio methods
are generally utilized for at least the three latest accident
years, due to the relatively low credibility of the reported
losses. The loss experience is generally reviewed separately for
lead umbrella classes and for other excess classes, due to the
relatively shorter tail for lead umbrella business.
Automobile-related claims are generally reviewed separately from
non-auto claims, due to the shorter-tail
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 89
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
nature of the automobile related claims. Claims relating to
certain latent exposures such as construction defects or
exhaustion of underlying product aggregate limits are reviewed
separately due to the unique emergence patterns of losses
relating to these claims. The expected loss ratios utilized for
recent accident years are based on the projected ultimate loss
ratios of prior years, adjusted for rate changes, estimated loss
cost trends and all other changes that can be quantified. The
estimated loss cost trend utilized in the year-end 2008 reviews
averaged approximately five percent for excess casualty classes.
Frequency/severity methods are generally not utilized as the
vast majority of reported claims do not result in a claim
payment. In addition, the average severity varies significantly
from accident year to accident year due to large losses which
characterize this class of business, as well as changing
proportions of claims which do not result in a claim payment.
D&O: AIG generally utilizes a combination
of loss development methods and expected loss ratio methods for
D&O and related management liability classes of business.
Expected loss ratio methods are given more weight in the two
most recent accident years, whereas loss development methods are
given more weight in more mature accident years. In addition to
these traditional actuarial methods, AIGs actuaries
utilize ground-up claim projections provided by AIG claims staff
as a benchmark for determining the indicated ultimate losses for
all accident years other than the most recent accident year. For
the year-end 2008 loss reserve review, claims projections for
accident years 2007 and prior were utilized. These classes of
business reflect claims made coverage, and losses are
characterized by low frequency and high severity. Thus, the
claim projections can produce an overall indicator of the
ultimate loss exposure for these classes by identifying and
estimating all large losses. Frequency/severity methods are
generally not utilized for these classes as the overall losses
are driven by large losses more than by claim frequency.
Severity trends have varied significantly from accident year to
accident year.
Workers Compensation: AIG generally
utilizes loss development methods for all but the most recent
accident year. Expected loss ratio methods generally are given
significant weight only in the most recent accident year.
Workers compensation claims are generally characterized by
high frequency, low severity, and relatively consistent loss
development from one accident year to the next. AIG is a leading
writer of workers compensation, and thus has sufficient
volume of claims experience to utilize development methods. AIG
does not believe frequency/severity methods are as appropriate,
due to significant growth and changes in AIGs
workers compensation business over the years. AIG
generally segregates California business from other business in
evaluating workers compensation reserves. Certain classes
of workers compensation, such as construction, are also
evaluated separately. Additionally, AIG writes a number of very
large accounts which include workers compensation
coverage. These accounts are generally priced by AIG actuaries,
and to the extent appropriate, the indicated losses based on the
pricing analysis may be utilized to record the initial estimated
loss reserves for these accounts.
Excess Workers Compensation: AIG
generally utilizes a combination of loss development methods and
expected loss ratio methods. Loss development methods are given
the greater weight for mature accident years such as 2002 and
prior. Expected loss ratio methods are given the greater weight
for the more recent accident years. Excess workers
compensation is an extremely long-tail class of business, with
loss emergence extending for decades. Therefore there is limited
credibility in the reported losses for many of the more recent
accident years. For the mature accident years, AIGs
actuaries utilize claims projections provided by AIG claims
staff to help determine the loss development factors for this
class of business.
General Liability: AIG generally uses a
combination of loss development methods and expected loss ratio
methods for primary general liability or products liability
classes. For certain classes of business with sufficient loss
volume, loss development methods may be given significant weight
for all but the most recent one or two accident years, whereas
for smaller or more volatile classes of business, loss
development methods may be given limited weight for the five or
more most recent accident years. Expected loss ratio methods
would be utilized for the more recent accident years for these
classes. The loss experience for primary general liability
business is generally reviewed at a level that is believed to
provide the most appropriate data for reserve analysis. For
example, primary claims made business is generally segregated
from business written on an occurrence policy form.
Additionally, certain subclasses, such as construction, are
generally reviewed separately from business in other subclasses.
Due to the fairly long-tail nature of general liability
business, and the many subclasses that are reviewed
individually, there is less credibility in the reported losses
and increased reliance on expected loss ratio methods.
AIGs actuaries generally do not utilize frequency/severity
methods to test reserves for this business, due to significant
changes and growth in AIGs general liability and products
liability business over the years.
90 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Commercial Automobile Liability: AIG generally
utilizes loss development methods for all but the most recent
accident year for commercial automobile classes of business.
Expected loss ratio methods are generally given significant
weight only in the most recent accident year. Frequency/severity
methods are generally not utilized due to significant changes
and growth in this business over the years.
Healthcare: AIG generally uses a combination
of loss development methods and expected loss ratio methods for
healthcare classes of business. The largest component of the
healthcare business consists of coverage written for hospitals
and other healthcare facilities. Reserves for excess coverage
are tested separately from those for primary coverage. For
primary coverages, loss development methods are generally given
the majority of the weight for all but the latest three accident
years, and are given some weight for all years other than the
latest accident year. For excess coverages, expected loss
methods are generally given all the weight for the latest three
accident years, and are also given considerable weight for
accident years prior to the latest three years. For other
classes of healthcare coverage, an analogous weighting between
loss development and expected loss ratio methods is utilized.
The weights assigned to each method are those which are believed
to result in the best combination of responsiveness and
stability. Frequency/severity methods are sometimes utilized for
pricing certain healthcare accounts or business. However, in
testing loss reserves the business is generally combined into
larger groupings to enhance the credibility of the loss
experience. The frequency/severity methods that are applicable
in pricing may not be appropriate for reserve testing and thus
frequency/severity methods are not generally employed in
AIGs healthcare reserve analyses.
Professional Liability: AIG generally uses a
combination of loss development methods and expected loss ratio
methods for professional liability classes of business. Loss
development methods are used for the more mature accident years.
Greater weight is given to expected loss ratio methods in the
more recent accident years. Reserves are tested separately for
claims made classes and classes written on occurrence policy
forms. Further segmentations are made in a manner believed to
provide an appropriate balance between credibility and
homogeneity of the data. Frequency/severity methods are used in
pricing and profitability analyses for some classes of
professional liability; however, for loss reserve testing, the
need to enhance credibility generally results in classes that
are not sufficiently homogenous to utilize frequency/severity
methods.
Catastrophic Casualty: AIG utilizes expected
loss ratio methods for all accident years for catastrophic
casualty business. This class of business consists of casualty
or financial lines coverage which attaches in excess of very
high attachment points; thus the claims experience is marked by
very low frequency and high severity. Because of the limited
number of claims, loss development methods are not utilized. The
expected loss ratios and loss development assumptions utilized
are based upon the results of prior accident years for this
business as well as for similar classes of business written
above lower attachment points. The business is generally written
on a claims made basis. AIG utilizes
ground-up
claim projections provided by AIG claims staff to assist in
developing the appropriate reserve.
Aviation: AIG generally uses a combination of
loss development methods and expected loss ratio methods for
aviation exposures. Aviation claims are not very long-tail in
nature; however, they are driven by claim severity. Thus a
combination of both development and expected loss ratio methods
are used for all but the latest accident year to determine the
loss reserves. Expected loss ratio methods are used to determine
the loss reserves for the latest accident year.
Frequency/severity methods are not employed due to the high
severity nature of the claims and different mix of claims from
year to year.
Personal Auto (Domestic): AIG generally
utilizes frequency/severity methods and loss development methods
for domestic personal auto classes. For many classes of
business, greater reliance is placed on frequency/severity
methods as claim counts emerge quickly for personal auto and
allow for more immediate analysis of resulting loss trends and
comparisons to industry and other diagnostic metrics.
Fidelity/Surety: AIG generally uses loss
development methods for fidelity exposures for all but the
latest accident year. Expected loss ratio methods are also given
weight for the more recent accident years, and for the latest
accident year they may be given 100 percent weight. For
surety exposures, AIG generally uses the same method as for
short-tail classes.
Mortgage Guaranty: AIG tests mortgage guaranty
reserves using loss development methods, supplemented by an
internal claim analysis by actuaries and staff who specialize in
the mortgage guaranty business. The claim
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 91
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
analysis projects ultimate losses for claims within each of
several categories of delinquency based on actual historical
experience and is essentially a frequency/severity analysis for
each category of delinquency. Additional reserve tests using
Bornhuetter Ferguson methods are also employed, as
well as tests measuring losses as a percent of risk in force.
Reserves are reviewed separately for each class of business to
consider the loss development characteristics associated with
the claims, the volume of claim data available for the
applicable class and the applicability of various actuarial
methods to the class.
Short-Tail Classes: AIG generally uses either
loss development methods or IBNR factor methods to set reserves
for short-tail classes such as property coverages. Where a
factor is used, it generally represents a percent of earned
premium or other exposure measure. The factor is determined
based on prior accident year experience. For example, the IBNR
for a class of property coverage might be expected to
approximate 20 percent of the latest years earned
premium. The factor is continually reevaluated in light of
emerging claim experience as well as rate changes or other
factors that could affect the adequacy of the IBNR factor being
employed.
International: Business written by AIGs
Foreign General Insurance sub-segment includes both long-tail
and short-tail classes of business. For long-tail classes of
business, the actuarial methods utilized would be analogous to
those described above. However, the majority of business written
by Foreign General Insurance is short-tail, high frequency and
low severity in nature. For this business, loss development
methods are generally employed to test the loss reserves. AIG
maintains a data base of detailed historical premium and loss
transactions in original currency for business written by
Foreign General Insurance, thereby allowing AIG actuaries to
determine the current reserves without any distortion from
changes in exchange rates over time. In testing the Foreign
General Insurance reserves, AIGs actuaries segment the
data by region, country or class of business as appropriate to
determine an optimal balance between homogeneity and credibility.
Loss Adjustment Expenses: AIG determines
reserves for legal defense and cost containment loss adjustment
expenses for each class of business by one or more actuarial
methods. The methods generally include development methods
analogous to those described for loss development methods. The
developments could be based on either the paid loss adjustment
expenses or the ratio of paid loss adjustment expenses to paid
losses, or both. Other methods include the utilization of
expected ultimate ratios of paid loss expense to paid losses,
based on actual experience from prior accident years or from
similar classes of business. AIG generally determines reserves
for adjuster loss adjustment expenses based on calendar year
ratios of adjuster expenses paid to losses paid for the
particular class of business. AIG generally determines reserves
for other unallocated loss adjustment expenses based on the
ratio of the calendar year expenses paid to overall losses paid.
This determination is generally done for all classes of business
combined, and reflects costs of home office claim overhead as a
percent of losses paid.
Catastrophes: Special analyses are conducted
by AIG in response to major catastrophes in order to estimate
AIGs gross and net loss and loss expense liability from
the events. These analyses may include a combination of
approaches, including modeling estimates, ground-up claim
analysis, loss evaluation reports from
on-site
field adjusters, and market share estimates.
AIGs loss reserve analyses do not calculate a range of
loss reserve estimates. Because a large portion of the loss
reserves from AIGs General Insurance business relates to
longer-tail casualty classes of business driven by severity
rather than frequency of claims, such as excess casualty and
D&O, developing a range around loss reserve estimates would
not be meaningful. Using the reserving methodologies described
above, AIGs actuaries determine their best estimate of the
required reserve and advise management of that amount. AIG then
adjusts its aggregate carried reserves as necessary so that the
actual carried reserves as of December 31 reflect this best
estimate.
Volatility
of Reserve Estimates and Sensitivity Analyses
As described above, AIG uses numerous assumptions in determining
its best estimate of reserves for each class of business. The
importance of any specific assumption can vary by both class of
business and accident year. If actual experience differs from
key assumptions used in establishing reserves, there is
potential for significant variation in the development of loss
reserves, particularly for long-tail casualty classes of
business such as excess casualty, D&O or workers
compensation. Set forth below is a sensitivity analysis that
estimates the effect on the loss reserve position of using
alternative loss trend or loss development factor assumptions
rather than those actually used in determining AIGs best
estimates in the year-end loss reserve analyses in 2008. The
analysis addresses each major class of business for which a
material deviation to AIGs overall reserve position is
believed reasonably
92 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
possible, and uses what AIG believes is a reasonably likely
range of potential deviation for each class. There can be no
assurance, however, that actual reserve development will be
consistent with either the original or the adjusted loss trend
or loss development factor assumptions, or that other
assumptions made in the reserving process will not materially
affect reserve development for a particular class of business.
Excess Casualty: For the excess casualty class
of business, the assumed loss cost trend was approximately five
percent. After evaluating the historical loss cost trends from
prior accident years since the early 1990s, in AIGs
judgment, it is reasonably likely that actual loss cost trends
applicable to the year-end 2008 loss reserve review for excess
casualty will range from negative five percent to positive
15 percent, or approximately ten percent lower or higher
than the assumption actually utilized in the year-end 2008
reserve review. A ten percent change in the assumed loss cost
trend for excess casualty would cause approximately a
$2.4 billion increase or a $1.6 billion decrease in
the net loss and loss expense reserve for this class of
business. It should be emphasized that the ten percent
deviations are not considered the highest possible deviations
that might be expected, but rather what is considered by AIG to
reflect a reasonably likely range of potential deviation. Actual
loss cost trends in the early 1990s were negative for several
years, including amounts below the negative five percent cited
above, whereas actual loss cost trends in the late 1990s ran
well into the double digits for several years, including amounts
greater than the 15 percent cited above. Thus, there can be
no assurance that loss trends will not deviate by more than ten
percent. The loss cost trend assumption is critical for the
excess casualty class of business due the long-tail nature of
the claims and therefore is applied across many accident years.
For the excess casualty class of business, the assumed loss
development factors are also a key assumption. After evaluating
the historical loss development factors from prior accident
years since the early 1990s, in AIGs judgment, it is
reasonably likely that actual loss development factors will
range from approximately 4.4 percent below those actually
utilized in the year-end 2008 reserve review to approximately
6.4 percent above those factors actually utilized. If the
loss development factor assumptions were changed by
4.4 percent and 6.4 percent, respectively, the net
loss reserves for the excess casualty class would decrease by
approximately $900 million under the lower assumptions or
increase by approximately $1.5 billion under the higher
assumptions. Generally, actual historical loss development
factors are used to project future loss development. However
there can be no assurance that future loss development patterns
will be the same as in the past, or that they will not deviate
by more than the amounts illustrated above. Moreover, as excess
casualty is a long-tail class of business, any deviation in loss
cost trends or in loss development factors might not be
discernible for an extended period of time subsequent to the
recording of the initial loss reserve estimates for any accident
year. Thus, there is the potential for the reserves with respect
to a number of accident years to be significantly affected by
changes in the loss cost trends or loss development factors that
were initially relied upon in setting the reserves. These
changes in loss trends or loss development factors could be
attributable to changes in inflation or in the judicial
environment, or in other social or economic conditions affecting
claims. Thus, there is the potential for variations greater than
the amounts cited above, either positively or negatively.
D&O and Related Management Liability Classes of
Business: For D&O and related management
liability classes of business, the assumed loss cost trend was
approximately four percent. After evaluating the historical loss
cost trends from prior accident years since the early 1990s,
including the potential effect of recent claims relating to the
credit crisis, in AIGs judgment, it is reasonably likely
that actual loss cost trends applicable to the year-end 2008
loss reserve review for these classes will range from negative
11 percent to positive 24 percent, or approximately
15 percent lower or 20 percent higher than the
assumption actually utilized in the year-end 2008 reserve
review. A 20 or 15 percent change in the assumed loss cost
trend for these classes would cause approximately a
$950 million increase or a $600 million decrease,
respectively, in the net loss and loss expense reserves for
these classes of business. It should be emphasized that the 20
and 15 percent deviations are not considered the highest
possible deviations that might be expected, but rather what is
considered by AIG to reflect a reasonably likely range of
potential deviation. Actual loss cost trends for these classes
since the early 1990s were negative for several years, including
amounts below the negative 11 percent cited above, whereas
actual loss cost trends exceeded the 24 percent figure
cited above for several other years. Because the D&O class
of business has exhibited highly volatile loss trends from one
accident year to the next, there is the possibility of an
exceptionally high deviation.
For D&O and related management liability classes of
business, the assumed loss development factors are also an
important assumption but less critical than for excess casualty.
Because these classes are written on a claims
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 93
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
made basis, the loss reporting and development tail is much
shorter than for excess casualty. However, the high severity
nature of the claims does create the potential for significant
deviations in loss development patterns from one year to the
next. After evaluating the historical loss development factors
for these classes of business for accident years since the early
1990s, in AIGs judgment, it is reasonably likely that
actual loss development factors will range from approximately
8.5 percent lower to 3.5 percent higher than those
factors actually utilized in the year-end 2008 loss reserve
review for these classes. If the loss development factor
assumptions were changed by 8.5 percent and
3.5 percent, respectively, the net loss reserves for these
classes would be estimated to decrease or increase by
approximately $300 million and $150 million,
respectively. As noted above for excess casualty, actual
historical loss development factors are generally used to
project future loss development. However, there can be no
assurance that future loss development patterns will be the same
as in the past, or that they will not deviate by more than the
8.5 percent or 3.5 percent amounts.
Excess Workers Compensation: For excess
workers compensation business, loss costs were trended at
six percent per annum. After reviewing actual industry loss
trends for the past ten years, in AIGs judgment, it is
reasonably likely that actual loss cost trends applicable to the
year-end 2008 loss reserve review for excess workers
compensation will range five percent lower or higher than this
estimated loss trend. A five percent change in the assumed loss
cost trend would cause approximately a $425 million
increase or a $275 million decrease in the net loss
reserves for this business. It should be emphasized that the
actual loss cost trend could vary significantly from this
assumption, and there can be no assurance that actual loss costs
will not deviate, perhaps materially, by greater than five
percent.
For excess workers compensation business, the assumed loss
development factors are a critical assumption. Excess
workers compensation is an extremely long-tail class of
business, with a much greater than normal uncertainty as to the
appropriate loss development factors for the tail of the loss
development. After evaluating the historical loss development
factors for prior accident years since the 1980s, in AIGs
judgment, it is reasonably likely that actual loss development
factors will range from approximately 12 percent lower to
20 percent higher than those factors actually utilized in
the year-end 2008 loss reserve review for excess workers
compensation. If the loss development factor assumptions were
increased by 20 percent or decreased by 12 percent,
the net loss reserves for excess workers compensation
would increase or decrease by approximately $950 million
and $550 million, respectively. Given the exceptionally
long-tail for this class of business, there is the potential for
actual deviations in the loss development tail to exceed the
deviations assumed, perhaps materially.
Primary Workers Compensation: For
primary workers compensation, the loss cost trend
assumption is not believed to be material with respect to
AIGs loss reserves. This is primarily because AIGs
actuaries are generally able to use loss development projections
for all but the most recent accident years reserves, so
there is limited need to rely on loss cost trend assumptions for
primary workers compensation business.
However, for primary workers compensation business the
loss development factor assumptions are important. Generally,
AIGs actual historical workers compensation loss
development factors would be expected to provide a reasonably
accurate predictor of future loss development. However,
workers compensation is a long-tail class of business, and
AIGs business reflects a very significant volume of losses
particularly in recent accident years due to growth of the
business. After evaluating the actual historical loss
developments since the 1980s for this business, in AIGs
judgment, it is reasonably likely that actual loss development
factors will fall within the range of approximately
3.6 percent below to 9.4 percent above those actually
utilized in the year-end 2008 loss reserve review. If the loss
development factor assumptions were changed by 3.6 percent
and 9.4 percent, respectively, the net loss reserves for
workers compensation would decrease or increase by
approximately $900 million and $2.4 billion,
respectively. For this class of business, there can be no
assurance that actual deviations from the expected loss
development factors will not exceed the deviations assumed,
perhaps materially.
Other Casualty Classes of Business: For
casualty business other than the classes discussed above, there
is generally some potential for deviation in both the loss cost
trend and loss development factor assumptions. However, the
effect of such deviations is expected to be less material when
compared to the effect on the classes cited above.
94 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Asbestos
and Environmental Reserves
The estimation of loss reserves relating to asbestos and
environmental claims on insurance policies written many years
ago is subject to greater uncertainty than other types of claims
due to inconsistent court decisions as well as judicial
interpretations and legislative actions that in some cases have
tended to broaden coverage beyond the original intent of such
policies and in others have expanded theories of liability. The
insurance industry as a whole is engaged in extensive litigation
over these coverage and liability issues and is thus confronted
with a continuing uncertainty in its efforts to quantify these
exposures.
AIG continues to receive claims asserting injuries and damages
from toxic waste, hazardous substances, and other environmental
pollutants and alleged claims to cover the cleanup costs of
hazardous waste dump sites, referred to collectively as
environmental claims, and indemnity claims asserting injuries
from asbestos.
The vast majority of these asbestos and environmental claims
emanate from policies written in 1984 and prior years.
Commencing in 1985, standard policies contained an absolute
exclusion for pollution-related damage and an absolute asbestos
exclusion was also implemented. The current environmental
policies that AIG underwrites on a claims-made basis have been
excluded from the analysis herein.
The majority of AIGs exposures for asbestos and
environmental claims are excess casualty coverages, not primary
coverages. Thus, the litigation costs are treated in the same
manner as indemnity amounts. That is, litigation expenses are
included within the limits of the liability AIG incurs.
Individual significant claim liabilities, where future
litigation costs are reasonably determinable, are established on
a
case-by-case
basis.
Estimation of asbestos and environmental claims loss reserves is
a subjective process and reserves for asbestos and environmental
claims cannot be estimated using conventional reserving
techniques such as those that rely on historical accident year
loss development factors. The methods used to determine asbestos
and environmental loss estimates and to establish the resulting
reserves are continually reviewed and updated by management.
Significant factors which affect the trends that influence the
asbestos and environmental claims estimation process are the
court resolutions and judicial interpretations which broaden the
intent of the policies and scope of coverage. The current case
law can be characterized as still evolving, and there is little
likelihood that any firm direction will develop in the near
future. Additionally, the exposures for cleanup costs of
hazardous waste dump sites involve issues such as allocation of
responsibility among potentially responsible parties and the
governments refusal to release parties from liability.
Due to this uncertainty, it is not possible to determine the
future development of asbestos and environmental claims with the
same degree of reliability as with other types of claims. Such
future development will be affected by the extent to which
courts continue to expand the intent of the policies and the
scope of the coverage, as they have in the past, as well as by
the changes in Superfund and waste dump site coverage and
liability issues. If the asbestos and environmental reserves
develop deficiently, such deficiency would have an adverse
effect on AIGs future results of operations.
With respect to known asbestos and environmental claims, AIG
established over two decades ago specialized toxic tort and
environmental claims units, which investigate and adjust all
such asbestos and environmental claims. These units evaluate
these asbestos and environmental claims utilizing a
claim-by-claim
approach that involves a detailed review of individual policy
terms and exposures. Because each policyholder presents
different liability and coverage issues, AIG generally evaluates
exposure on a
policy-by-policy
basis, considering a variety of factors such as known facts,
current law, jurisdiction, policy language and other factors
that are unique to each policy. Quantitative techniques have to
be supplemented by subjective considerations, including
management judgment. Each claim is reviewed at least
semi-annually utilizing the aforementioned approach and adjusted
as necessary to reflect the current information.
In both the specialized and dedicated asbestos and environmental
claims units, AIG actively manages and pursues early resolution
with respect to these claims in an attempt to mitigate its
exposure to the unpredictable development of these claims. AIG
attempts to mitigate its known long-tail environmental exposures
by utilizing a combination of proactive claim-resolution
techniques, including policy buybacks, complete environmental
releases, compromise settlements, and, where indicated,
litigation.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 95
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
With respect to asbestos claims handling, AIGs specialized
claims staff operates to mitigate losses through proactive
handling, supervision and resolution of asbestos cases. Thus,
while AIG has resolved all claims with respect to miners and
major manufacturers (Tier One), its claims staff continues
to operate under the same proactive philosophy to resolve claims
involving accounts with products containing asbestos
(Tier Two), products containing small amounts of asbestos,
companies in the distribution process, and parties with remote,
ill-defined involvement in asbestos (Tiers Three and Four).
Through its commitment to appropriate staffing, training, and
management oversight of asbestos cases, AIG seeks to mitigate
its exposure to these claims.
To determine the appropriate loss reserve as of
December 31, 2008 for its asbestos and environmental
exposures, AIG performed a series of top-down and
ground-up
reserve analyses. In order to ensure it had the most
comprehensive analysis possible, AIG engaged a third-party
actuary to assist in a review of these exposures, including
ground-up
estimates for asbestos reserves consistent with the 2005 through
2007 reviews as well as a top-down report year projection for
environmental reserves. Prior to 2005, AIGs reserve
analyses for asbestos and environmental exposures were focused
around a report year projection of aggregate losses for both
asbestos and environmental reserves. Additional tests such as
market share analyses were also performed.
Ground-up
analyses take into account policyholder-specific and
claim-specific information that has been gathered over many
years from a variety of sources.
Ground-up
studies can thus more accurately assess the exposure to
AIGs layers of coverage for each policyholder, and hence
for all policyholders in the aggregate, provided a sufficient
sample of the policyholders can be modeled in this manner.
In order to ensure its
ground-up
analysis was comprehensive, AIG staff produced the information
required at policy and claim level detail for over 800 asbestos
defendants. This represented over 95 percent of all
accounts for which AIG had received any claim notice of any
amount pertaining to asbestos exposure. AIG did not set any
minimum thresholds, such as amount of case reserve outstanding,
or paid losses to date, that would have served to reduce the
sample size and hence the comprehensiveness of the
ground-up
analysis. The results of the
ground-up
analysis for each significant account were examined by
AIGs claims staff for reasonableness, for consistency with
policy coverage terms, and any claim settlement terms
applicable. Adjustments were incorporated accordingly. The
results from the universe of modeled accounts, which as noted
above reflects the vast majority of AIGs known exposures,
were then utilized to estimate the ultimate losses from accounts
or exposures that could not be modeled and to determine an
appropriate provision for unreported claims.
AIG conducted a comprehensive analysis of reinsurance
recoverability to establish the appropriate asbestos and
environmental reserve net of reinsurance. AIG determined the
amount of reinsurance that would be ceded to insolvent
reinsurers or to commuted reinsurance contracts for both
reported claims and for IBNR. These amounts were then deducted
from the indicated amount of reinsurance recoverable. The
year-end 2008 analysis reflected an update to the comprehensive
analysis of reinsurance recoverability that was first completed
in 2005 and updated in 2006 and 2007. All asbestos accounts for
which there was a significant change in estimated losses in the
2008 review were analyzed to determine the appropriate reserve
net of reinsurance.
AIG also completed a top-down report year projection of its
indicated asbestos and environmental loss reserves. These
projections consist of a series of tests performed separately
for asbestos and for environmental exposures.
For asbestos, these tests project the losses expected to be
reported over the next 18 years, i.e., from 2009 through
2026, based on the actual losses reported through 2008 and the
expected future loss emergence for these claims. Three scenarios
were tested, with a series of assumptions ranging from more
optimistic to more conservative.
For environmental claims, an analogous series of
frequency/severity tests are produced. Environmental claims from
future report years, (i.e., IBNR) are projected out eight years,
i.e., through the year 2016.
At year-end 2008, AIG considered a number of factors and recent
experience in addition to the results of the respective top-down
and
ground-up
analyses performed for asbestos and environmental reserves. AIG
considered the significant uncertainty that remains as to
AIGs ultimate liability relating to asbestos and
environmental claims. This uncertainty is due to several factors
including:
|
|
|
|
|
The long latency period between asbestos exposure and disease
manifestation and the resulting potential for involvement of
multiple policy periods for individual claims;
|
96 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in the volume of claims by currently unimpaired
plaintiffs;
|
|
|
|
Claims filed under the non-aggregate premises or operations
section of general liability policies;
|
|
|
|
The number of insureds seeking bankruptcy protection and the
effect of prepackaged bankruptcies;
|
|
|
|
Diverging legal interpretations; and
|
|
|
|
With respect to environmental claims, the difficulty in
estimating the allocation of remediation cost among various
parties.
|
After carefully considering the results of the
ground-up
analysis, which AIG updates on an annual basis, as well as all
of the above factors, including the recent report year
experience, AIG increased its gross asbestos reserves by
$200 million and increased its net asbestos reserves by
$30 million. Additionally, during 2008 an amount of adverse
incurred loss development pertaining to asbestos was reflected
which was primarily attributed to several large defendants, the
effect of which was largely offset by one large favorable
settlement.
Upon completion of the environmental top-down report year
analysis performed in the fourth quarter of 2008, no adjustment
to gross and net reserves was recognized. Additionally, during
2008 a moderate amount of favorable gross incurred loss
development pertaining to environmental was reflected which was
primarily attributable to recent favorable experience which was
fully insured, resulting in no favorable net development on
environmental net reserves.
A summary of reserve activity, including estimates for
applicable IBNR, relating to asbestos and environmental claims
separately and combined appears in the table below. The vast
majority of such claims arise from policies written in 1984 and
prior years. The current environmental policies that AIG
underwrites on a claims-made basis have been excluded from the
table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Asbestos:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense at
beginning of year
|
|
$
|
3,864
|
|
|
$
|
1,454
|
|
|
$
|
4,523
|
|
|
$
|
1,889
|
|
|
$
|
4,501
|
|
|
$
|
1,840
|
|
Losses and loss expenses incurred*
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
572
|
|
|
|
267
|
|
Losses and loss expenses paid*
|
|
|
(694
|
)
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
|
|
(755
|
)
|
|
|
(440
|
)
|
|
|
(550
|
)
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense at end
of year
|
|
$
|
3,443
|
|
|
$
|
1,200
|
|
|
$
|
3,864
|
|
|
$
|
1,454
|
|
|
$
|
4,523
|
|
|
$
|
1,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Environmental:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense at
beginning of year
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
|
$
|
629
|
|
|
$
|
290
|
|
|
$
|
969
|
|
|
$
|
410
|
|
Losses and loss expenses incurred*
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
(231
|
)
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Losses and loss expenses paid*
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
|
(124
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(109
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense at end
of year
|
|
$
|
417
|
|
|
$
|
194
|
|
|
$
|
515
|
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
|
$
|
629
|
|
|
$
|
290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense at
beginning of year
|
|
$
|
4,379
|
|
|
$
|
1,691
|
|
|
$
|
5,152
|
|
|
$
|
2,179
|
|
|
$
|
5,470
|
|
|
$
|
2,250
|
|
Losses and loss expenses incurred*
|
|
|
229
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
Losses and loss expenses paid*
|
|
|
(748
|
)
|
|
|
(348
|
)
|
|
|
(879
|
)
|
|
|
(506
|
)
|
|
|
(659
|
)
|
|
|
(279
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense at end
of year
|
|
$
|
3,860
|
|
|
$
|
1,394
|
|
|
$
|
4,379
|
|
|
$
|
1,691
|
|
|
$
|
5,152
|
|
|
$
|
2,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
All amounts pertain to policies underwritten in prior years,
primarily to policies issued in 1984 and prior. |
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 97
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
The gross and net IBNR included in the liability for
unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense, relating to
asbestos and environmental claims separately and combined were
estimated as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Asbestos
|
|
$
|
2,301
|
|
|
$
|
939
|
|
|
$
|
2,701
|
|
|
$
|
1,145
|
|
|
$
|
3,270
|
|
|
$
|
1,469
|
|
Environmental
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
378
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
$
|
2,550
|
|
|
$
|
1,038
|
|
|
$
|
3,026
|
|
|
$
|
1,276
|
|
|
$
|
3,648
|
|
|
$
|
1,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of asbestos and environmental claims count activity
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of or for the Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Asbestos
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Asbestos
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
Asbestos
|
|
|
Environmental
|
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims at beginning of year
|
|
|
6,563
|
|
|
|
7,652
|
|
|
|
14,215
|
|
|
|
6,878
|
|
|
|
9,442
|
|
|
|
16,320
|
|
|
|
7,293
|
|
|
|
9,873
|
|
|
|
17,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims during year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Opened
|
|
|
639
|
|
|
|
1,065
|
|
|
|
1,704
|
|
|
|
656
|
|
|
|
937
|
|
|
|
1,593
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
1,383
|
|
|
|
2,026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settled
|
|
|
(219
|
)
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
(426
|
)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dismissed or otherwise resolved
|
|
|
(1,203
|
)
|
|
|
(1,836
|
)
|
|
|
(3,039
|
)
|
|
|
(821
|
)
|
|
|
(2,548
|
)
|
|
|
(3,369
|
)
|
|
|
(908
|
)
|
|
|
(1,659
|
)
|
|
|
(2,567
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims at end of year
|
|
|
5,780
|
|
|
|
6,674
|
|
|
|
12,454
|
|
|
|
6,563
|
|
|
|
7,652
|
|
|
|
14,215
|
|
|
|
6,878
|
|
|
|
9,442
|
|
|
|
16,320
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Survival
Ratios Asbestos and Environmental
The following table presents AIGs survival ratios for
asbestos and environmental claims at December 31, 2008,
2007 and 2006. The survival ratio is derived by dividing the
current carried loss reserve by the average payments for the
three most recent calendar years for these claims. Therefore,
the survival ratio is a simplistic measure estimating the number
of years it would be before the current ending loss reserves for
these claims would be paid off using recent year average
payments. The December 31, 2008 survival ratio is lower
than the ratio at December 31, 2007 because the more recent
periods included in the rolling average reflect higher claims
payments. In addition, AIGs survival ratio for asbestos
claims was negatively affected by the favorable settlement
described above, as well as several similar settlements during
2007. These settlements reduced gross and net asbestos survival
ratios at December 31, 2008 by approximately 1.1 years
and 2.4 years, respectively, and reduced gross and net
asbestos survival ratios at December 31, 2007 by
approximately 1.3 years and 2.6 years, respectively.
Many factors, such as aggressive settlement procedures, mix of
business and level of coverage provided, have a significant
effect on the amount of asbestos and environmental reserves and
payments and the resultant survival ratio. Moreover, as
discussed above, the primary basis for AIGs determination
of its reserves is not survival ratios, but instead the
ground-up
and top-down analysis. Thus, caution should be exercised in
attempting to determine reserve adequacy for these claims based
simply on this survival ratio.
AIGs survival ratios for asbestos and environmental
claims, separately and combined, were based upon a three-year
average payment and were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Gross
|
|
Net
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Survival ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asbestos
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
Environmental
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
5.1
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
98 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Gross
|
|
Net
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Survival ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asbestos
|
|
|
7.1
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
Environmental
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
3.7
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
6.7
|
|
|
|
5.2
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Survival ratios:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asbestos
|
|
|
11.8
|
|
|
|
12.9
|
|
Environmental
|
|
|
5.6
|
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
Combined
|
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
10.3
|
|
Life
Insurance & Retirement Services Operations
AIGs Life Insurance & Retirement Services
operations offer a wide range of insurance and retirement
savings products both domestically and abroad.
AIGs Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement
Services operations include insurance and investment-oriented
products such as whole and term life, investment linked,
universal life and endowments, personal accident and health
products, group products including pension, life and health, and
fixed and variable annuities. The Foreign Life
Insurance & Retirement Services products are sold
through independent producers, career agents, financial
institutions and direct marketing channels.
AIGs Domestic Life Insurance operations offer a broad
range of protection products, such as individual life insurance
and group life and health products, including disability income
products and payout annuities, which include single premium
immediate annuities, structured settlements and terminal funding
annuities. The Domestic Life Insurance products are sold through
independent producers, career agents, financial institutions and
direct marketing channels. Home service operations include an
array of life insurance, accident and health and annuity
products sold primarily through career agents.
AIGs Domestic Retirement Services operations include group
retirement products, individual fixed and variable annuities
sold through banks, broker-dealers and exclusive sales
representatives, and annuity runoff operations, which include
previously acquired closed blocks and other fixed
and variable annuities largely sold through distribution
relationships that have been discontinued.
AIGs Life Insurance & Retirement Services
reports its operations through the following major internal
reporting units and legal entities:
Foreign
Life Insurance & Retirement Services
Japan and Other
|
|
|
|
|
American Life Insurance Company (ALICO)
|
|
|
|
AIG Star Life Insurance Co., Ltd. (AIG Star Life)
|
|
|
|
AIG Edison Life Insurance Company (AIG Edison Life)
|
Asia
|
|
|
|
|
American International Assurance Company, Limited, together with
American International Assurance Company (Bermuda) Limited (AIA)
|
|
|
|
Nan Shan Life Insurance Company, Ltd. (Nan Shan)
|
|
|
|
American International Reinsurance Company Limited (AIRCO)
|
|
|
|
The Philippine American Life and General Insurance Company
(Philamlife)
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 99
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Domestic Life Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
American General Life Insurance Company (AIG American General)
|
|
|
|
The United States Life Insurance Company in the City of New York
(USLIFE)
|
|
|
|
American General Life and Accident Insurance Company (AGLA)
|
Domestic Retirement Services
|
|
|
|
|
The Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company (VALIC)
|
|
|
|
AIG Annuity Insurance Company (AIG Annuity)
|
|
|
|
AIG SunAmerica Life Assurance Company (AIG SunAmerica)
|
Life
Insurance & Retirement Services
Results
Life Insurance & Retirement Services results were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Net Realized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Capital Gains
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Considerations
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Income (Loss)*
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan and Other
|
|
$
|
14,513
|
|
|
$
|
980
|
|
|
$
|
(5,693
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,800
|
|
|
$
|
(2,687
|
)
|
Asia
|
|
|
15,406
|
|
|
|
981
|
|
|
|
(6,092
|
)
|
|
|
10,295
|
|
|
|
(3,650
|
)
|
Total Foreign Life & Retirement Services
|
|
|
29,919
|
|
|
|
1,961
|
|
|
|
(11,785
|
)
|
|
|
20,095
|
|
|
|
(6,337
|
)
|
Domestic Life Insurance
|
|
|
6,248
|
|
|
|
3,799
|
|
|
|
(11,568
|
)
|
|
|
(1,521
|
)
|
|
|
(10,238
|
)
|
Domestic Retirement Services
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
4,346
|
|
|
|
(20,994
|
)
|
|
|
(15,520
|
)
|
|
|
(20,871
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
37,295
|
|
|
$
|
10,106
|
|
|
$
|
(44,347
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,054
|
|
|
$
|
(37,446
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan and Other
|
|
$
|
12,387
|
|
|
$
|
6,083
|
|
|
$
|
(294
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,176
|
|
|
$
|
3,044
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
14,214
|
|
|
|
5,766
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
20,087
|
|
|
|
3,153
|
|
Total Foreign Life & Retirement Services
|
|
|
26,601
|
|
|
|
11,849
|
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
38,263
|
|
|
|
6,197
|
|
Domestic Life Insurance
|
|
|
5,836
|
|
|
|
3,995
|
|
|
|
(803
|
)
|
|
|
9,028
|
|
|
|
642
|
|
Domestic Retirement Services
|
|
|
1,190
|
|
|
|
6,497
|
|
|
|
(1,408
|
)
|
|
|
6,279
|
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
33,627
|
|
|
$
|
22,341
|
|
|
$
|
(2,398
|
)
|
|
$
|
53,570
|
|
|
$
|
8,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan and Other
|
|
$
|
11,106
|
|
|
$
|
5,239
|
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
|
$
|
16,751
|
|
|
$
|
3,821
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
13,060
|
|
|
|
4,519
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
17,880
|
|
|
|
3,060
|
|
Total Foreign Life & Retirement Services
|
|
|
24,166
|
|
|
|
9,758
|
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
34,631
|
|
|
|
6,881
|
|
Domestic Life Insurance
|
|
|
5,543
|
|
|
|
3,778
|
|
|
|
(215
|
)
|
|
|
9,106
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
Domestic Retirement Services
|
|
|
1,057
|
|
|
|
6,488
|
|
|
|
(404
|
)
|
|
|
7,141
|
|
|
|
2,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
30,766
|
|
|
$
|
20,024
|
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
$
|
50,878
|
|
|
$
|
10,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease) 2008 vs. 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan and Other
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
(84
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(46
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Asia
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total Foreign Life & Retirement Services
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic Life Insurance
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic Retirement Services
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
(55
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(94
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Net Realized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Capital Gains
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Considerations
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Income (Loss)*
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease) 2007 vs. 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Japan and Other
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
(20
|
)%
|
Asia
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Total Foreign Life & Retirement Services
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Domestic Life Insurance
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Domestic Retirement Services
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(19
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
2008 operating income (loss) includes goodwill impairment
charges of $402 million and $817 million for
Domestic Life Insurance and Domestic Retirement Services,
respectively. |
The following table presents the gross insurance in force for
Life Insurance & Retirement Services:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In billions)
|
|
|
Foreign*
|
|
$
|
1,352
|
|
|
$
|
1,327
|
|
|
$
|
1,163
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
985
|
|
|
|
908
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,378
|
|
|
$
|
2,312
|
|
|
$
|
2,071
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes increases of $57.8 billion, $55.1 billion
and $41.5 billion related to changes in foreign exchange
rates at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. |
2008 and
2007 Comparison
Total revenues decreased in 2008 compared to 2007, primarily due
to significantly higher levels of net realized capital losses
and lower net investment income. See Consolidated Results and
Investments Portfolio Review for further discussion.
Premiums and other considerations increased in 2008 compared to
2007 primarily due to increased production and favorable foreign
exchange rates in the Foreign Life Insurance &
Retirement Services operations and sales of payout annuities in
Domestic Life Insurance.
In addition to the higher net realized capital losses and lower
net investment income noted above, the operating loss for 2008
increased as a result of DAC and sales inducement asset (SIA)
unlocking and related reserve strengthening of $1.5 billion
in the Domestic Retirement Services operations resulting from
the continued weakness in the equity markets, the significantly
higher surrender activity resulting from AIG parents
liquidity issues beginning in mid-September and goodwill
impairment charges of $1.2 billion in the Domestic Life
Insurance and Domestic Retirement Services companies. The
impairment charges were attributable to declines in the
estimated fair values of reporting units in the Property and
Casualty Group, Domestic Life Insurance and Domestic Retirement
Services, Consumer Finance and Capital Markets businesses
attributable to the uncertain economic environment that
developed in late 2008 coupled with other indications of fair
value developed through the restructuring and asset disposition
activities. The operating loss also included higher benefit
costs in the Japan variable life product resulting from declines
in the Japanese equity market. These decreases were partially
offset by the favorable effect of foreign exchange rates and
growth in the underlying business in force. The operating loss
in 2008 included a DAC and SIA benefit of $3.2 billion
related to net realized capital losses compared to a benefit of
$333 million in 2007.
AIG adopted FAS 157 on January 1, 2008. The adoption
of FAS 157 resulted in an increase in pre-tax net realized
capital losses of $155 million as of January 1, 2008,
partially offset by a $47 million DAC benefit related to
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 101
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
these losses. These results were primarily due to an increase in
the embedded policy derivative liability valuations resulting
from the inclusion of explicit risk margins.
AIG adopted FAS 159 on January 1, 2008 and elected to
apply the fair value option to a closed block of single premium
variable life business in Japan and to an investment-linked
product sold principally in Asia. The adoption of FAS 159
with respect to these fair value elections resulted in a
decrease to 2008 opening retained earnings of $559 million,
net of tax. The fair value of the liabilities for these policies
totaled $2.6 billion at December 31, 2008 and is
reported in policyholder contract deposits.
2007 and
2006 Comparison
The severe credit market disruption was a key driver of
operating results in 2007 principally due to significant net
realized capital losses resulting from other-than-temporary
impairment charges and losses on derivative instruments not
qualifying for hedge accounting treatment. See Results of
Operations Consolidated Results Net Realized Gains
(Losses) for further discussion.
Life Insurance & Retirement Services total revenues
increased in 2007 compared to 2006 despite the higher net
realized capital losses primarily due to higher premiums and
other considerations and higher net investment income.
Operating income in 2007 decreased compared to 2006 primarily
due to net realized capital losses and the following:
|
|
|
|
|
mark-to-market trading losses of $150 million related to
investment-linked products in the U.K.;
|
|
|
|
DAC amortization charges of $108 million related to the
adoption in 2007 of
SOP 05-1;
|
|
|
|
remediation activity charges of $118 million; and
|
|
|
|
out-of-period adjustments related to UCITS and participating
policyholder dividends, which increased 2006 operating income by
$332 million.
|
These decreases were partially offset as operating income in
2006 was negatively affected by charges of $125 million for
the Superior National arbitration ruling, $66 million
related to exiting the domestic financial institutions credit
life business and $55 million related to other litigation
charges.
Foreign
Life Insurance & Retirement Services
Results
Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services
results on a sub-product basis were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Net Realized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Capital Gains
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Income /
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Considerations
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$
|
17,839
|
|
|
$
|
1,734
|
|
|
$
|
(8,837
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,736
|
|
|
$
|
(5,669
|
)
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
7,055
|
|
|
|
371
|
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
7,041
|
|
|
|
1,040
|
|
Group products
|
|
|
3,777
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
4,360
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
761
|
|
|
|
2,320
|
|
|
|
(2,660
|
)
|
|
|
421
|
|
|
|
(2,125
|
)
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
487
|
|
|
|
(2,974
|
)
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(2,463
|
)
|
|
|
(147
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
29,919
|
|
|
$
|
1,961
|
|
|
$
|
(11,785
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,095
|
|
|
$
|
(6,337
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
102 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Net Realized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Capital Gains
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Income /
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Considerations
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$
|
16,630
|
|
|
$
|
7,473
|
|
|
$
|
85
|
|
|
$
|
24,188
|
|
|
$
|
3,898
|
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
6,094
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
6,445
|
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
Group products
|
|
|
2,979
|
|
|
|
753
|
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
3,656
|
|
|
|
263
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
|
|
548
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
460
|
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
(22
|
)
|
|
|
1,424
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
26,601
|
|
|
$
|
11,849
|
|
|
$
|
(187
|
)
|
|
$
|
38,263
|
|
|
$
|
6,197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$
|
15,732
|
|
|
$
|
5,937
|
|
|
$
|
574
|
|
|
$
|
22,243
|
|
|
$
|
4,247
|
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
5,518
|
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
5,858
|
|
|
|
1,459
|
|
Group products
|
|
|
2,226
|
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
2,921
|
|
|
|
450
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
2,027
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
2,458
|
|
|
|
580
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
861
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,151
|
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
24,166
|
|
|
$
|
9,758
|
|
|
$
|
707
|
|
|
$
|
34,631
|
|
|
$
|
6,881
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease) 2008 vs. 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
(77
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(56
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
Group products
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
(83
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(47
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease) 2007 vs. 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
(85
|
)%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
(8
|
)%
|
Personal accident
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group products
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(42
|
)
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG transacts business in most major foreign currencies and
therefore premiums and other considerations reported in
U.S. dollars vary by volume and from changes in foreign
currency translation rates.
The following table summarizes the effect of changes in
foreign currency exchange rates on the growth of the Foreign
Life Insurance & Retirement Services premiums and
other considerations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Growth in original currency*
|
|
|
6.7
|
%
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange effect
|
|
|
5.8
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Growth as reported in U.S. dollars
|
|
|
12.5
|
%
|
|
|
10.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Computed using a constant exchange rate each period. |
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 103
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
2008
and 2007 Comparison
Total revenues for Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement
Services in 2008 decreased compared to 2007 primarily due to
substantial net realized capital losses and significantly lower
net investment income. See Consolidated Results Net
Investment Income and Net Realized Capital Gains
(Losses).
Despite the continued growth in the underlying business in force
and the positive effect of foreign exchange, operating income in
2008 also decreased compared to 2007 due to:
|
|
|
|
|
higher losses of $262 million on certain investment
linked-products in the U.K. due to mark-to-market trading losses
partially offset by a positive change in benefit reserves
resulting from changes to the Premier Access Bond product
following significant surrender activity as a result of the AIG
liquidity issues in mid-September. As allowed under the contract
terms, surrenders were suspended to allow sufficient time to
develop an appropriate course of action with the respective
distribution network and to protect the interest of the
funds policyholders. Policyholders received a cash
distribution equal to approximately half of their account value
and were given the option to receive the remainder in cash at a
discounted amount based on the value of the underlying
investments or transfer their account value into a newly created
fund. The newly created fund is valued at the net asset value of
the underlying investments but provides for a guarantee of a
minimum amount should the policyholder remain in the fund until
July 2012. Any surrenders prior to July 2012 will be at the net
asset value;
|
|
|
|
higher benefit costs, net of related DAC unlocking, of
$106 million principally related to volatility in the
Japanese equity market and declines in interest rates and,
|
|
|
|
Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services continued
its ongoing project to increase standardization of AIGs
actuarial systems and processes throughout the world which
resulted in a favorable effect on operating income of
$151 million for 2008 compared to a $183 million
positive effect in 2007.
|
Partially offsetting these items were higher DAC and SIA
benefits of $132 million related to the net realized
capital losses and higher surrender charge income related to the
temporary spike in policy surrenders during the fourth quarter.
Generally, surrenders have returned to normal levels in the
foreign operations. In addition, operating income for 2007
included $118 million of remediation activity charges and
$67 million of additional claim expense related to an
industry-wide regulatory claims review in Japan.
2007
and 2006 Comparison
Total revenues for Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement
Services in 2007 increased compared to 2006, primarily due to
higher premiums and other considerations and net investment
income partially offset by net realized capital losses. Net
investment income increased in 2007 compared to 2006 due to
higher levels of assets under management, higher policyholder
trading gains and higher partnership and mutual fund income.
Operating income decreased in 2007 compared to 2006 principally
due to:
|
|
|
|
|
net realized capital losses;
|
|
|
|
mark-to-market trading losses of $150 million related to
investment-linked products in the U.K.;
|
|
|
|
remediation activity charge of $118 million;
|
|
|
|
additional claim expense of $67 million relating to an
industry-wide regulatory review of claims in Japan;
|
|
|
|
additional policyholder benefits expense of $36 million
related to a closed block of Japanese business with guaranteed
benefits; and
|
|
|
|
out-of-period adjustments benefiting 2006 earnings for
$332 million related to UCITS and participating
policyholder dividend reserves.
|
These decreases were partially offset by higher net investment
income, a $183 million positive effect of changes in
actuarial estimates and the positive effect of changes in
foreign exchange rates.
104 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Foreign
Life Insurance & Retirement Services Sales and
Deposits*
First year premium, single premium and annuity deposits for
Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
2008 vs 2007
|
|
2007 vs 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Original
|
|
|
|
Original
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
U.S. $
|
|
Currency
|
|
U.S. $
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
First year premium
|
|
$
|
4,815
|
|
|
$
|
5,032
|
|
|
$
|
4,542
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
(7
|
)%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Single premium
|
|
|
10,738
|
|
|
|
15,905
|
|
|
|
5,283
|
|
|
|
(32
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
Annuity deposits
|
|
|
17,665
|
|
|
|
19,150
|
|
|
|
21,916
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Excludes operations in Brazil. |
2008
and 2007 Comparison
First year premium sales in 2008 declined compared to 2007
primarily due to decreases in life insurance and personal
accident sales. In Japan, life insurance sales were lower due to
reduced levels of increasing term sales and lower sales in the
fourth quarter of 2008 related to AIGs liquidity issues.
Also in Japan, personal accident sales declined in the direct
marketing distribution channel due to lower response rates
resulting from market saturation. In Taiwan, regular premium
life insurance sales declined due to a shift in sales to
investment-linked and variable annuity products. These declines
were partially offset by increases in group products sales,
particularly in Japan, Australia and the Middle East.
Single premium sales in 2008 declined compared to 2007 primarily
due to lower guaranteed income bond deposits in the U.K. which
fell as customers shifted to variable annuity products during
the first three quarters of the year and which were
significantly negatively affected in the fourth quarter by
AIGs liquidity issues. Single premium sales in Asia also
dropped as customers became concerned about declining equity
markets, particularly in Taiwan, Hong Kong, Singapore and China.
A new single premium personal accident and health product
launched in Japan during the first quarter of 2008 continues to
perform well and sales, which started through banks, are being
expanded to the agency channels.
Annuity deposits decreased in 2008 compared to 2007 as the
decline in individual variable annuity deposits more than offset
the increase in individual fixed annuity deposits.
Investment-linked deposits in the U.K. decreased significantly
in the fourth quarter of 2008 due to the AIG liquidity issues.
Individual variable annuity deposits in Taiwan increased in 2008
compared to 2007 due to the launch of a new variable annuity
product. In Japan, individual fixed annuity deposits increased
in 2008 compared to 2007 due primarily to a favorable exchange
rate environment for non-yen denominated products. However,
AIGs liquidity issues and the planned disposition of
AIGs Japan life operations negatively affected deposits in
the fourth quarter of 2008 as banks suspended the distribution
of AIG products. While some banks in Japan have resumed sales of
annuity products, most have not. AIG has, therefore, increased
sales of annuity deposits through agents.
2007
and 2006 Comparison
First year premium sales in 2007 increased compared to 2006 in
both U.S. dollar terms and original currency primarily due
to strong investment-oriented product sales in Southeast Asia.
This increase was partially offset by declines in Japan
resulting from the suspension of increasing term sales and lower
personal accident production resulting from changes in local tax
regulations.
Single premium sales in 2007 increased dramatically compared to
2006, driven primarily by guaranteed income bond sales in the
U.K. and investment-oriented product sales in Hong Kong and
Singapore.
Annuity deposits declined in 2007 compared to 2006. Individual
fixed annuity deposits were negatively affected by an
unfavorable exchange rate environment and a shift to variable
annuity products. Individual variable annuity deposits declined
in 2007 compared to 2006 in both Europe and Japan. In Europe,
lower deposits reflected the effect of tax law changes that
reduced tax benefits to policyholders. In Japan, lower sales
resulted from increased
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 105
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
competition and the introduction of a new law that increased
sales compliance and customer suitability requirements.
Domestic
Life Insurance Results
Domestic Life Insurance results, presented on a sub-product
basis were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Net Realized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Capital Gains
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Income
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Considerations
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
(Loss)(a)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$
|
2,478
|
|
|
$
|
1,324
|
|
|
$
|
(8,182
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,380
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,360
|
)
|
Home service
|
|
|
743
|
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
(1,422
|
)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(1,314
|
)
|
Group life/health
|
|
|
847
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
(336
|
)
|
|
|
703
|
|
|
|
(332
|
)
|
Payout annuities(b)
|
|
|
2,131
|
|
|
|
1,242
|
|
|
|
(1,209
|
)
|
|
|
2,164
|
|
|
|
(1,026
|
)
|
Individual fixed and runoff annuities
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
428
|
|
|
|
(419
|
)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
(206
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,248
|
|
|
$
|
3,799
|
|
|
$
|
(11,568
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,521
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,238
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$
|
2,352
|
|
|
$
|
1,528
|
|
|
$
|
(584
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,296
|
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
Home service
|
|
|
767
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
(100
|
)
|
|
|
1,307
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
Group life/health
|
|
|
842
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
1,026
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
Payout annuities(b)
|
|
|
1,820
|
|
|
|
1,153
|
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
2,906
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
Individual fixed and runoff annuities
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
474
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,836
|
|
|
$
|
3,995
|
|
|
$
|
(803
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,028
|
|
|
$
|
642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
$
|
2,127
|
|
|
$
|
1,377
|
|
|
$
|
(83
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,421
|
|
|
$
|
654
|
|
Home service
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
|
630
|
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
1,382
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
Group life/health
|
|
|
995
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
Payout annuities(b)
|
|
|
1,582
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
2,535
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
Individual fixed and runoff annuities
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
554
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
5,543
|
|
|
$
|
3,778
|
|
|
$
|
(215
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,106
|
|
|
$
|
917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease) 2008 vs. 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
(13
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Home service
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group life/health
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Payout annuities
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Individual fixed and runoff annuities
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Net Realized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Capital Gains
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Income
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Considerations
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
(Loss)(a)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease) 2007 vs. 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
(65
|
)%
|
Home service
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
Group life/health
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Payout annuities
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Individual fixed and runoff annuities
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(1
|
)%
|
|
|
(30
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
2008 operating income (loss) includes goodwill impairment
charges of $80 million for life insurance,
$280 million for home service and $42 million for
group life/health. |
|
(b) |
|
Premiums and other considerations include structured
settlements, single premium immediate annuities and terminal
funding annuities. |
2008
and 2007 Comparison
Total revenues for Domestic Life Insurance decreased in 2008
compared to 2007 primarily due to significantly higher net
realized capital losses and lower net investment income,
partially offset by higher premiums and other considerations.
Domestic Life Insurance premiums and other considerations
increased due to strong payout annuities sales and growth in
life insurance business in force. The growth in payout annuities
deposits was driven by structured settlement and terminal
funding annuities in both the U.S. and Canada. Net
investment income declined due to higher policyholder trading
losses offset in policyholder benefits, reduced overall
investment yields from increased levels of short-term
investments and lower partnership and call and tender income.
Partially offsetting these items were growth in underlying
businesses and reduced losses due to the phaseout of synthetic
fuel production investments. The increase in net realized
capital losses was primarily driven by other-than-temporary
impairment charges. See Results of Operations
Consolidated Results Net Investment Income and Net
Realized Capital Losses and Investments Securities
Lending Activities.
Domestic Life Insurance reported a significant operating loss in
2008 compared to operating income in 2007 due principally to
significantly lower revenues (as described above), goodwill
impairment charges and restructuring expenses in 2008. Partially
offsetting these items was the continued growth in the
underlying business in force and favorable mortality experience
in life insurance and payout annuities. Life insurance results
were also affected by higher DAC amortization of
$30 million related to the change in the unearned revenue
liability described above, resulting in a net benefit of
$22 million. In addition, 2007 payout annuities operating
income was adversely affected by a $30 million adjustment
to increase group annuity reserves. Policyholder benefit
reserves in 2008 included an increase of $12 million
related to the workers compensation reinsurance program
compared to a reduction in expense of $52 million in 2007.
Operating income (loss) includes a DAC benefit related to
realized capital losses of $364 million in 2008 compared to
a benefit of $13 million in 2007.
2007
and 2006 Comparison
Total revenues for Domestic Life Insurance decreased in 2007
compared to 2006 primarily due to net realized capital losses
partially offset by higher net investment income and premiums
and other considerations. The Domestic Life Insurance premiums
and other considerations increased as a result of higher payout
annuity deposits and growth in life insurance business in force,
partially offset by decreased group life/health premiums from
exiting the financial institutions credit life business at the
end of 2006.
Operating income decreased in 2007 compared with 2006 due
principally to net realized capital losses. In addition,
operating income in 2007 was negatively affected by a
$52 million charge due to changes in actuarial estimates
which included DAC unlocking and refinements in estimates
resulting from actuarial valuation system enhancements and a
$67 million increase in DAC amortization related to
SOP 05-1.
These items were partially
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 107
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
offset by a $52 million decrease in policy benefits due to
additional reinsurance recoveries associated with Superior
National. Operating income in 2006 included a $125 million
charge related to the Superior National workers
compensation arbitration, a $66 million loss related to
exiting the financial institutions credit life business and a
$55 million charge related to litigation reserves.
Domestic
Life Insurance Sales and Deposits
Domestic Life Insurance sales and deposits by product* were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Periodic premium by product:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Universal life
|
|
$
|
167
|
|
|
$
|
230
|
|
|
$
|
334
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)%
|
|
|
(31
|
)%
|
Variable universal life
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Term life
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Whole life/other
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(31
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total periodic premiums by product
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unscheduled and single deposits
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total life insurance
|
|
|
718
|
|
|
|
939
|
|
|
|
912
|
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Home service
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life insurance and accident and health
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Fixed annuities
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Unscheduled and single deposits
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total home service
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group life/health
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Payout annuities
|
|
|
2,893
|
|
|
|
2,612
|
|
|
|
2,465
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Individual fixed and runoff annuities
|
|
|
930
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales and deposits
|
|
$
|
4,969
|
|
|
$
|
4,319
|
|
|
$
|
4,387
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
(2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Life insurance sales include periodic premium from new
business expected to be collected over a one-year period and
unscheduled and single premiums from new and existing
policyholders. Sales of group accident and health insurance
represent annualized first year premium from new policies.
Annuity sales represent deposits from new and existing
policyholders. |
2008
and 2007 Comparison
Total Domestic Life Insurance sales and deposits increased in
2008 compared to 2007 primarily due to strong payout and
individual fixed annuities sales, partially offset by a decline
in total life insurance premiums. Payout annuities sales
increased due to strong terminal funding and structured
settlement sales in both the U.S. and Canada. Individual
fixed annuities sales increased as a result of the interest rate
environment as credited rates offered were more competitive with
the rates offered by banks on certificates of deposit. The
ratings downgrades and negative publicity related to AIG
resulted in lower sales and deposits for the fourth quarter of
2008.
The U.S. life insurance market remains highly competitive
and Domestic Lifes emphasis on maintaining new business
margins has affected sales of term and universal life products,
although recent enhancements to term products resulted in an
increase in sales prior to AIGs liquidity issues in
September 2008.
108 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Domestic
Retirement Services Results
Domestic Retirement Services results, presented on a
sub-product basis were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Net Realized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Capital Gains
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Considerations
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
(Losses)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
Income (Loss)(a)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group retirement products
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
1,461
|
|
|
$
|
(6,700
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,838
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,283
|
)
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
2,487
|
|
|
|
(11,928
|
)
|
|
|
(9,313
|
)
|
|
|
(11,646
|
)
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
584
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
(1,281
|
)
|
|
|
(612
|
)
|
|
|
(1,884
|
)
|
Individual annuities runoff(b)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
313
|
|
|
|
(1,085
|
)
|
|
|
(757
|
)
|
|
|
(1,058
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,128
|
|
|
$
|
4,346
|
|
|
$
|
(20,994
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15,520
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,871
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group retirement products
|
|
$
|
446
|
|
|
$
|
2,280
|
|
|
$
|
(451
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,275
|
|
|
$
|
696
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
|
3,664
|
|
|
|
(829
|
)
|
|
|
2,931
|
|
|
|
530
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
627
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
(45
|
)
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
Individual annuities runoff(b)
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
387
|
|
|
|
(83
|
)
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,190
|
|
|
$
|
6,497
|
|
|
$
|
(1,408
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,279
|
|
|
$
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group retirement products
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
|
$
|
2,279
|
|
|
$
|
(144
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,521
|
|
|
$
|
1,017
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
3,581
|
|
|
|
(257
|
)
|
|
|
3,446
|
|
|
|
1,036
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
738
|
|
|
|
193
|
|
Individual annuities runoff(b)
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,057
|
|
|
$
|
6,488
|
|
|
$
|
(404
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,141
|
|
|
$
|
2,323
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease) 2008 vs. 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group retirement products
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(34
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(315
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(417
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(48
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Individual annuities runoff
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(331
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(5
|
)%
|
|
|
(31
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(348
|
)%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease) 2007 vs. 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group retirement products
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(10
|
)%
|
|
|
(32
|
)%
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(49
|
)
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
Individual annuities runoff
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(12
|
)%
|
|
|
(42
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
2008 operating income (loss) includes goodwill impairment
charges of $817 million for individual fixed annuities. |
|
(b) |
|
Primarily represents runoff annuity business sold through
discontinued distribution relationships. |
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 109
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
2008
and 2007 Comparison
Domestic Retirement Services incurred an operating loss in 2008
compared to operating income in 2007, primarily due to
significantly increased net realized capital losses, losses on
partnership investments as well as DAC unlocking and related
reserve strengthening resulting from increased surrenders and
deteriorating equity markets and goodwill impairment charges.
See Results of Operations Consolidated
Results Net Investment Income and Net Realized
Capital Losses for further information. AIG discontinued its
U.S. securities lending program in December 2008. See
Investments Securities Lending Activities.
Both group retirement products and individual fixed annuities
reported operating losses in 2008 compared to operating income
in 2007 primarily as a result of increased net realized capital
losses due to higher other-than-temporary impairment charges and
goodwill impairment charges, lower net investment income due to
partnership losses, lower yield enhancement income and reduced
overall investment yield from increased levels of short-term
investments. In addition, DAC and SIA unlocking for group
retirement products and individual fixed annuities totaled
$210 million and $171 million, respectively, driven by
projected increases in surrenders and deteriorating equity
markets. These negative effects were partially offset by DAC and
SIA benefits of $1.7 billion related to the net realized
capital losses compared to $182 million in 2007.
Individual variable annuities reported an operating loss in 2008
compared to operating income in 2007 primarily as a result of
significantly increased net realized capital losses, principally
due to $822 million of increased embedded policy derivative
liability valuations, net of related economic hedges and
other-than-temporary impairment charges. In addition, the
operating loss included $1.1 billion of DAC unlocking and
related reserve strengthening resulting primarily from the
deteriorating equity markets. Operating losses also included DAC
and SIA benefits of $454 million related to the net
realized capital losses compared to $16 million in 2007.
2007
and 2006 Comparison
Total revenues and operating income for Domestic Retirement
Services declined in 2007 compared to 2006 primarily due to
increased net realized capital losses. Net realized capital
losses for Domestic Retirement Services increased due to higher
other-than-temporary impairment charges and sales to reposition
assets in certain investment portfolios for both group
retirement products and individual fixed annuities, as well as
from changes in the value of certain individual variable annuity
product guarantees and related hedges associated with living
benefit features. Changes in actuarial estimates, including DAC
unlockings and refinements to estimates resulting from actuarial
valuation system enhancements, resulted in a net decrease to
operating income of $112 million in 2007.
Domestic
Retirement Services Sales and Deposits
The following table presents the account value roll forward
for Domestic Retirement Services by product:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Group retirement products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
68,109
|
|
|
$
|
64,357
|
|
Deposits annuities
|
|
|
5,661
|
|
|
|
5,898
|
|
Deposits mutual funds
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
|
|
1,633
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Deposits
|
|
|
7,181
|
|
|
|
7,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surrenders and other withdrawals
|
|
|
(6,693
|
)
|
|
|
(6,551
|
)
|
Death benefits
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net inflows (outflows)
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
|
718
|
|
Change in fair value of underlying investments, interest
credited, net of fees
|
|
|
(11,490
|
)
|
|
|
3,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
56,861
|
|
|
$
|
68,109
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Individual fixed annuities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
50,508
|
|
|
$
|
52,685
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
7,276
|
|
|
|
5,085
|
|
Surrenders and other withdrawals
|
|
|
(9,571
|
)
|
|
|
(7,565
|
)
|
Death benefits
|
|
|
(1,721
|
)
|
|
|
(1,667
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net inflows (outflows)
|
|
|
(4,016
|
)
|
|
|
(4,147
|
)
|
Change in fair value of underlying investments, interest
credited, net of fees
|
|
|
1,902
|
|
|
|
1,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
48,394
|
|
|
$
|
50,508
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual variable annuities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
33,108
|
|
|
$
|
31,093
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
3,455
|
|
|
|
4,472
|
|
Surrenders and other withdrawals
|
|
|
(4,240
|
)
|
|
|
(4,158
|
)
|
Death benefits
|
|
|
(480
|
)
|
|
|
(497
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net inflows (outflows)
|
|
|
(1,265
|
)
|
|
|
(183
|
)
|
Change in fair value of underlying investments, interest
credited, net of fees
|
|
|
(8,250
|
)
|
|
|
2,198
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
23,593
|
|
|
$
|
33,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Domestic Retirement Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
151,725
|
|
|
$
|
148,135
|
|
Deposits
|
|
|
17,912
|
|
|
|
17,088
|
|
Surrenders and other withdrawals
|
|
|
(20,504
|
)
|
|
|
(18,274
|
)
|
Death benefits
|
|
|
(2,447
|
)
|
|
|
(2,426
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net inflows (outflows)
|
|
|
(5,039
|
)
|
|
|
(3,612
|
)
|
Change in fair value of underlying investments, interest
credited, net of fees
|
|
|
(17,838
|
)
|
|
|
7,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year, excluding runoff
|
|
|
128,848
|
|
|
|
151,725
|
|
Individual annuities runoff
|
|
|
5,079
|
|
|
|
5,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
133,927
|
|
|
$
|
157,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and separate account reserves and mutual funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General account reserve
|
|
$
|
89,140
|
|
|
$
|
88,801
|
|
Separate account reserve
|
|
|
38,499
|
|
|
|
60,461
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total general and separate account reserves
|
|
|
127,639
|
|
|
|
149,262
|
|
Group retirement mutual funds
|
|
|
6,288
|
|
|
|
8,153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reserves and mutual funds
|
|
$
|
133,927
|
|
|
$
|
157,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
and 2007 Comparison
Deposits in all three product lines were negatively affected by
the AIG ratings downgrades and AIGs liquidity issues
commencing in September 2008. The decrease in group retirement
products deposits was due to a decline in both group annuity
deposits and group mutual fund deposits. The improvement in
individual fixed annuity deposits was due to a steepened yield
curve, providing the opportunity to offer higher interest
crediting rates than certificates of deposits and mutual fund
money market rates available at the time. Both group retirement
products and
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 111
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
individual fixed annuities deposits decreased after the AIG
ratings downgrades. Individual variable annuity product sales
declined due to the AIG ratings downgrades and continued
weakness in the equity markets.
Domestic Retirement Services surrenders and other withdrawals
increased in all three product lines in 2008 compared to 2007
primarily due to the AIG ratings downgrades and AIGs
liquidity issues.
2007
and 2006 Comparison
Domestic Retirement Services deposits increased in 2007 compared
to 2006 primarily reflecting higher deposits in group retirement
products and individual variable annuities, partially offset by
a decrease in individual fixed annuities. Group retirement
deposits increased 10 percent in 2007 compared to 2006 as a
result of an increased focus on sales management and acquiring
outside deposits. Mutual funds deposits increased
20 percent while group annuity deposits increased
8 percent. Individual fixed annuity sales continued to face
increased competition from bank deposit products and money
market funds offering very competitive short-term rates in the
2007 yield curve environment, and as a result deposits decreased
5 percent in 2007 compared to 2006. Individual variable
annuity deposits increased 5 percent in 2007 compared to
2006 despite the discontinuation of a major bank proprietary
product.
Domestic Retirement Services surrenders and other withdrawals
increased in 2007 compared to 2006 reflecting higher surrenders
in both group retirement products and individual fixed
annuities. Group retirement surrenders increased as a result of
both normal maturing of the business and higher large group
surrenders in 2007 compared to 2006. Individual fixed annuity
surrenders and withdrawals increased in 2007 due to both an
increasing number of policies coming out of their surrender
charge period and increased competition from bank deposit
products.
The following table presents Domestic Retirement Services
reserves by surrender charge category and surrender rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Individual
|
|
|
Individual
|
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Fixed
|
|
|
Variable
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
Products*
|
|
|
Annuities
|
|
|
Annuities
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No surrender charge
|
|
$
|
43,797
|
|
|
$
|
10,287
|
|
|
$
|
8,594
|
|
0% 2%
|
|
|
1,320
|
|
|
|
3,043
|
|
|
|
3,097
|
|
Greater than 2% 4%
|
|
|
1,714
|
|
|
|
6,711
|
|
|
|
2,187
|
|
Greater than 4%
|
|
|
2,710
|
|
|
|
25,110
|
|
|
|
7,663
|
|
Non-Surrenderable
|
|
|
1,032
|
|
|
|
3,243
|
|
|
|
2,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reserves
|
|
$
|
50,573
|
|
|
$
|
48,394
|
|
|
$
|
23,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surrender rates
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
18.8
|
%
|
|
|
14.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
No surrender charge
|
|
$
|
49,770
|
|
|
$
|
11,316
|
|
|
$
|
13,014
|
|
0% 2%
|
|
|
3,284
|
|
|
|
3,534
|
|
|
|
5,381
|
|
Greater than 2% 4%
|
|
|
3,757
|
|
|
|
7,310
|
|
|
|
5,133
|
|
Greater than 4%
|
|
|
2,280
|
|
|
|
24,956
|
|
|
|
9,492
|
|
Non-Surrenderable
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
3,392
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Reserves
|
|
$
|
59,956
|
|
|
$
|
50,508
|
|
|
$
|
33,108
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Surrender rates
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
|
14.6
|
%
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Excludes mutual funds of $6.3 billion and
$8.2 billion in 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
Surrender rates increased for group retirement products and
individual variable and fixed annuities in 2008 compared to 2007
primarily due to the AIG ratings downgrades and AIGs
liquidity issues.
112 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Deferred
Policy Acquisition Costs and Sales Inducement
Assets
DAC for Life Insurance & Retirement Services products
arises from the deferral of costs that vary with, and are
directly related to, the acquisition of new or renewal business.
Policy acquisition costs for life insurance products are
generally deferred and amortized over the premium paying period
in accordance with FAS 60, Accounting and Reporting
by Insurance Enterprises (FAS 60). Policy acquisition
costs that relate to universal life and investment-type products
are generally deferred and amortized, with interest in relation
to the incidence of estimated gross profits to be realized over
the estimated lives of the contracts in accordance with
FAS 97. Value of Business Acquired (VOBA) is determined at
the time of acquisition and is reported on the consolidated
balance sheet with DAC and amortized over the life of the
business, similar to DAC. AIG offers sales inducements to
contract holders (bonus interest) on certain annuity and
investment contracts. Sales inducements are recognized as an
asset (SIA) with a corresponding increase to the liability for
policyholder contract deposits on the consolidated balance sheet
and are amortized over the life of the contract similar to DAC.
The deferral of acquisition and sales inducement costs decreased
$164 million in 2008 compared to 2007 primarily due to
declines in new business production resulting from AIGs
liquidity issues. Total amortization expense increased by
$1.5 billion in 2008 compared to 2007. The current year
amortization includes a $3.2 billion increase to operating
income related to net realized capital losses in 2008 compared
to $333 million in 2007 reflecting significantly higher
other-than-temporary impairment charges. Current year
amortization for Domestic Retirement Services also includes
adjustments for DAC and SIA unlocking of $961 million
related to the continued weakness in the equity markets and DAC
and SIA unlocking of $267 million due to higher surrender
activity. There was no effect from higher surrender activity in
Domestic Life and the Foreign Life operations as the write-off
of the DAC was offset by related policy charges. In 2007,
amortization expense included changes in actuarial estimates of
$732 million, mostly offset in policyholder benefits and
claims incurred, which decreased the reported expense.
Annualized amortization expense levels in 2008 and 2007 were
approximately 13 percent and 10 percent, respectively,
of the opening DAC balance.
AIG adopted FAS 159 on January 1, 2008 and elected to
apply fair value accounting for an investment-linked product
sold principally in Asia. Upon fair value election, all DAC and
SIA are written off and there is no further deferral or
amortization of DAC and SIA for that product. The amounts of DAC
and SIA written off as of January 1, 2008 were
$1.1 billion and $299 million, respectively.
The following table summarizes the major components of the
changes in DAC/VOBA and SIA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
DAC/VOBA
|
|
|
SIA
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
DAC/VOBA
|
|
|
SIA
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
26,175
|
|
|
$
|
681
|
|
|
$
|
26,856
|
|
|
$
|
21,153
|
|
|
$
|
404
|
|
|
$
|
21,557
|
|
Acquisition costs deferred
|
|
|
5,622
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
5,688
|
|
|
|
5,640
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
5,881
|
|
Amortization (charged) or credited to operating income(a)
|
|
|
(4,449
|
)
|
|
|
(90
|
)
|
|
|
(4,539
|
)
|
|
|
(1,879
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
(1,869
|
)
|
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
|
301
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
Increase (decrease) due to foreign exchange
|
|
|
(352
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(385
|
)
|
|
|
831
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
841
|
|
Other(b)
|
|
|
(1,091
|
)
|
|
|
(299
|
)
|
|
|
(1,390
|
)
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
26,166
|
|
|
$
|
317
|
|
|
$
|
26,483
|
|
|
$
|
26,175
|
|
|
$
|
681
|
|
|
$
|
26,856
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 113
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
DAC/VOBA
|
|
|
SIA
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
DAC/VOBA
|
|
|
SIA
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Domestic Life Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
6,432
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
6,485
|
|
|
$
|
6,006
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
6,052
|
|
Acquisition costs deferred
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
881
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
910
|
|
Amortization (charged) or credited to operating income
|
|
|
(324
|
)
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(328
|
)
|
|
|
(652
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(660
|
)
|
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
Increase (decrease) due to foreign exchange
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116
|
)
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
Other(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
7,236
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
7,302
|
|
|
$
|
6,432
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
6,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic Retirement Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
5,838
|
|
|
$
|
991
|
|
|
$
|
6,829
|
|
|
$
|
5,651
|
|
|
$
|
887
|
|
|
$
|
6,538
|
|
Acquisition costs deferred
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
|
942
|
|
Amortization (charged) or credited to operating income(a)
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
(836
|
)
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
(987
|
)
|
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
336
|
|
Increase (decrease) due to foreign exchange
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
7,211
|
|
|
$
|
1,415
|
|
|
$
|
8,626
|
|
|
$
|
5,838
|
|
|
$
|
991
|
|
|
$
|
6,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
38,445
|
|
|
$
|
1,725
|
|
|
$
|
40,170
|
|
|
$
|
32,810
|
|
|
$
|
1,337
|
|
|
$
|
34,147
|
|
Acquisition costs deferred
|
|
|
7,277
|
|
|
|
292
|
|
|
|
7,569
|
|
|
|
7,276
|
|
|
|
457
|
|
|
|
7,733
|
|
Amortization (charged) or credited to operating income(a)
|
|
|
(4,971
|
)
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
(5,026
|
)
|
|
|
(3,367
|
)
|
|
|
(149
|
)
|
|
|
(3,516
|
)
|
Change in unrealized gains (losses) on securities
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
1,586
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
815
|
|
Increase due to foreign exchange
|
|
|
(466
|
)
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
(499
|
)
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
926
|
|
Other(b)
|
|
|
(1,091
|
)
|
|
|
(298
|
)
|
|
|
(1,389
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
40,613
|
|
|
$
|
1,798
|
|
|
$
|
42,411
|
|
|
$
|
38,445
|
|
|
$
|
1,725
|
|
|
$
|
40,170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In 2007, Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement Services
includes lower amortization of $836 million related to
changes in actuarial estimates, mostly offset in Policyholder
benefits and claims incurred. Domestic Retirement Services
includes higher amortization of $104 million related to
changes in actuarial estimates. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
In 2008, primarily represents the cumulative effect of
adoption of FAS 159. In 2007, includes the cumulative effect of
adoption of
SOP 05-1. |
As AIG operates in various global markets, the estimated gross
profits used to amortize DAC, VOBA and SIA are subject to
differing market returns and interest rate environments in any
single period. The combination of market returns and interest
rates may lead to acceleration of amortization in some products
and regions and simultaneous deceleration of amortization in
other products and regions.
114 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
DAC, VOBA and SIA for insurance-oriented, investment-oriented
and retirement services products are reviewed for
recoverability, which involves estimating the future
profitability of current business. This review involves
significant management judgment. If actual future profitability
is substantially lower than estimated, AIGs DAC, VOBA and
SIA may be subject to an impairment charge and AIGs
results of operations could be significantly affected in future
periods.
Taiwan
Beginning in 2000, the yield available on Taiwanese
10-year
government bonds dropped from approximately 6 percent to
1.5 percent at December 31, 2008. Yields on most other
invested assets have correspondingly dropped over the same
period. Current sales are focused on products such as:
|
|
|
|
|
variable separate account products which do not contain interest
rate guarantees,
|
|
|
|
participating products which contain very low implied interest
rate guarantees, and
|
|
|
|
accident and health policies and riders.
|
In developing the reserve adequacy analysis for Nan Shan,
several key best estimate assumptions have been made:
|
|
|
|
|
Observed historical mortality improvement trends have been
projected to 2014;
|
|
|
|
Morbidity, expense and termination rates have been updated to
reflect recent experience;
|
|
|
|
Taiwan government bond rates are expected to remain at current
levels for 10 years and gradually increase to best estimate
assumptions of a market consensus view of long-term interest
rate expectations;
|
|
|
|
Foreign assets are assumed to comprise 35 percent of
invested assets, resulting in a composite long-term investment
assumption of approximately 4.9 percent; and
|
|
|
|
The current practice permitted in Taiwan of offsetting positive
mortality experience with negative interest margins, thus
eliminating the need for mortality dividends, will continue.
|
Future results of the reserve adequacy tests will involve
significant management judgment as to mortality, morbidity,
expense and termination rates and investment yields. Adverse
changes in these assumptions could accelerate DAC amortization
and necessitate reserve strengthening. Future results of the
reserve adequacy tests will be affected by the nature, timing
and duration of any potential change in investment strategy
implemented for Nan Shan.
Financial
Services Operations
AIGs Financial Services subsidiaries engage in diversified
activities including aircraft leasing, capital markets, and
consumer finance and insurance premium finance. Together, the
Aircraft Leasing, Capital Markets and Consumer Finance
operations generate the majority of the revenues produced by the
Financial Services operations. A.I. Credit also contributes to
Financial Services income principally by providing insurance
premium financing for both AIGs policyholders and those of
other insurers.
Capital Markets represents the operations of AIGFP, which
engaged as principal in a wide variety of financial
transactions, including standard and customized financial
products involving commodities, credit, currencies, energy,
equities and interest rates. AIGFP also invests in a diversified
portfolio of securities and engages in borrowing activities that
involve issuing standard and structured notes and other
securities and entering into GIAs. Given the extreme market
conditions experienced in 2008, downgrades of AIGs credit
ratings by the rating agencies, as well as AIGs intent to
refocus on its core businesses, AIGFP has begun to unwind its
businesses and portfolios including those associated with credit
protection written through credit default swaps on super senior
risk tranches of diversified pools of loans and debt securities.
Historically, AIGs Capital Markets operations derived a
significant portion of their revenues from hedged financial
positions entered into in connection with counterparty
transactions. AIGFP has also participated as a dealer in a wide
variety of financial derivatives transactions. Revenues and
operating income of the Capital Markets operations and the
percentage change in these amounts for any given period are
significantly affected by changes in
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 115
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
the fair value of AIGFPs assets and liabilities and by the
number, size and profitability of transactions entered into
during that period relative to those entered into during the
comparative period.
Financial
Services Results
Financial Services results were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft Leasing
|
|
$
|
5,075
|
|
|
$
|
4,694
|
|
|
$
|
4,082
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Capital Markets
|
|
|
(40,333
|
)
|
|
|
(9,979
|
)
|
|
|
(186
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Finance
|
|
|
3,849
|
|
|
|
3,655
|
|
|
|
3,587
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other, including intercompany adjustments
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
294
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(31,095
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,309
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,777
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aircraft Leasing
|
|
$
|
1,116
|
|
|
$
|
873
|
|
|
$
|
578
|
|
|
|
28
|
%
|
|
|
51
|
%
|
Capital Markets
|
|
|
(40,471
|
)
|
|
|
(10,557
|
)
|
|
|
(873
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer Finance
|
|
|
(1,261
|
)
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
Other, including intercompany adjustments
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(40,821
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,515
|
)
|
|
$
|
383
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 and
2007 Comparison
Financial Services reported operating losses in 2008 and 2007,
primarily due to unrealized market valuation losses related to
AIGFPs super senior credit default swap portfolios of
$28.6 billion and $11.5 billion in 2008 and 2007,
respectively. AIGFP also recorded operating losses of
$9.3 billion in 2008 representing the effect of changes in
credit spreads on the valuation of AIGFPs assets and
liabilities, including $185 million of gains reflected in
the unrealized market valuation loss on the super senior credit
default swaps. AGFs operating income declined in 2008
compared to 2007 primarily due to increases in the provision for
finance receivable losses of $674 million resulting from
increases to the allowance for finance receivable losses in
response to the higher levels of delinquencies on AGFs
finance receivable portfolio, higher net charge-offs, and a
goodwill impairment charge of $341 million. As of
December 31, 2008, AGF reclassified $1.0 billion of
real estate loans to be held for sale due to managements
change in intent to hold these receivables. Based on
negotiations with prospective purchasers, AGF determined that a
write-down of $27 million was necessary to reduce the
carrying value of these loans to net realizable value. The sales
of these loans were completed in February 2009. As of
December 31, 2008, AGFs intent to hold for investment
the remainder of the finance receivable portfolio had not
changed. AIGCFG also recorded a goodwill impairment charge of
$343 million in 2008. The net loss in the Other reporting
unit resulted primarily from the change in fair value of
interest rate swaps on economically hedged exposures.
ILFC generated strong operating income growth in 2008 compared
to 2007, driven to a large extent by a larger aircraft fleet,
higher lease rates and lower composite borrowing rates.
2007 and
2006 Comparison
Financial Services reported an operating loss in 2007 compared
to operating income in 2006 primarily due to an unrealized
market valuation loss of $11.5 billion on AIGFPs
super senior credit default swap portfolio, an
other-than-temporary impairment charge on AIGFPs available
for sale investment securities of $643 million recorded in
other income, and a decline in operating income for AGF.
AGFs operating income declined in 2007 compared to 2006,
due to reduced residential mortgage origination volumes, lower
revenues from its mortgage banking activities
116 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
and increases in the provision for finance receivable losses. In
2007, AGFs mortgage banking operations also recorded a
pre-tax charge of $178 million, representing the estimated
cost of implementing the Supervisory Agreement entered into with
the OTS.
ILFC generated strong operating income growth in 2007 compared
to 2006, driven to a large extent by a larger aircraft fleet,
higher lease rates and higher utilization.
In 2007, AIGFP began applying hedge accounting under
FAS 133 to certain of its interest rate swaps and foreign
currency forward contracts that hedge its investments and
borrowings and AGF and ILFC began applying hedge accounting to
most of their derivatives that hedge floating rate and foreign
currency denominated borrowings. Prior to 2007, hedge accounting
was not applied to any of AIGs derivatives and related
assets and liabilities. Accordingly, revenues and operating
income were exposed to volatility resulting from differences in
the timing of revenue recognition between the derivatives and
the hedged assets and liabilities.
Capital
Markets Results
2008
and 2007 Comparison
AIGFPs operating loss increased in 2008 compared to 2007
primarily related to its super senior multi-sector CDO credit
default swap portfolio and the effect of credit spreads on the
valuation of its assets and liabilities. The 2008 net
operating loss was driven by the extreme market conditions
experienced during the year and the effects of downgrades of
AIGs credit ratings by the rating agencies. The net
operating results were also affected by internal efforts during
the first half of 2008 intended to preserve liquidity. As a
result of AIGs intention to refocus on its core business,
AIGFP began unwinding its businesses and portfolios. For a
further discussion, see Overview Outlook
Financial Services.
AIG recognized an unrealized market valuation loss of
$28.6 billion in 2008 compared to $11.5 billion in
2007, representing the change in fair value of its super senior
credit default swap portfolio. The principal components of the
loss recognized in 2008 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately $25.7 billion relates to derivatives written
on the super senior tranches of multi-sector CDOs. The material
decline in the fair value of these derivatives was caused by
significant deterioration in the pricing and credit quality of
RMBS, CMBS and CDO securities. Included in this amount is a loss
of $4.3 billion with respect to the change in fair value of
transactions outstanding at December 31, 2008 having a net
notional amount of $12.6 billion. Also included in the
unrealized market valuation losses on AIGFPs super senior
credit default swap portfolio are losses of approximately
$995 million that were subsequently realized through
payments to counterparties to acquire at par value the
underlying CDO securities with fair values that were less than
par. Specifically, during the second quarter of 2008, AIGFP
issued new maturity-shortening puts that allow the holders of
the securities issued by certain CDOs to treat the securities as
short-term eligible 2a-7 investments under the Investment
Company Act of 1940 (2a-7 Puts), with a net notional amount of
$5.4 billion on the super senior security issued by a CDO
of AAA-rated commercial mortgage-backed securities (CMBS)
pursuant to a facility that was entered into in 2005. All of
these 2a-7 Puts and other 2a-7 Puts in AIGFPs multi-sector
CDO super senior credit default swap portfolio with a combined
net notional amount of $9.4 billion were exercised by the
counterparties during 2008. In addition, AIGFP extinguished its
obligations with respect to one other credit default swap by
purchasing the protected CDO security at its principal amount
outstanding of $162 million. These transactions represent
all of the payments that have been made to counterparties
through December 31, 2008 on the super senior credit
default swap portfolio of AIGFP under the settlement provisions
of these contracts. AIGFP has not committed to enter into any
new 2a-7 Puts.
|
Further, included in the unrealized market valuation losses on
AIGFPs super senior credit default swap portfolio are
losses of approximately $21.1 billion that were
subsequently realized through the termination of contracts
through the ML III transaction. See Note 5 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately $2.3 billion relates to derivatives written
as part of the corporate arbitrage portfolio. The decline in the
fair value of these derivatives was caused by the continued
significant widening in corporate credit spreads.
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 117
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
Approximately $379 million relates to the decline in fair
value of a transaction in the regulatory capital portfolio where
AIGFP no longer believes the credit default swap is used by the
counterparty to obtain regulatory capital relief.
|
See Critical Accounting Estimates Valuation of
Level 3 Assets and Liabilities and Note 5 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of
AIGFPs super senior credit default swap portfolio.
During 2008, AIGFP recognized a loss of $888 million on
credit derivatives which are not included in the super senior
credit default swap portfolio, compared to a net gain of
$370 million in 2007.
The following table presents AIGFPs credit valuation
adjustment gains (losses) for the year ended December 31,
2008 (excluding intercompany transactions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty Credit Valuation Adjustment on Assets
|
|
|
AIGs Own Credit Valuation Adjustment on Liabilities
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Trading securities
|
|
$
|
(8,928
|
)
|
|
Term notes
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
Loans and other assets
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
Hybrid term notes
|
|
|
646
|
|
Derivative assets
|
|
|
(1,667
|
)
|
|
GIAs
|
|
|
(415
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative liabilities*
|
|
|
860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in assets
|
|
$
|
(10,656
|
)
|
|
Decrease in liabilities
|
|
$
|
1,394
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pre-tax decrease to other income
|
|
$
|
(9,262
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes super senior credit default swap portfolio |
Capital Markets operating loss for 2008 includes a loss of
$9.3 billion representing the effect of changes in credit
spreads on the valuation of AIGFPs assets and liabilities,
including $185 million of gains reflected in the unrealized
market valuation loss on super senior credit default swaps.
Historically, AIGs credit spreads and those on
AIGFPs assets moved in a similar fashion. This
relationship began to diverge during second quarter of 2008 and
continued to diverge through the end of the year. While
AIGs credit spreads widened significantly during 2008, the
credit spreads on the ABS and CDO products, which represent a
significant portion of AIGFPs investment portfolio,
widened even more. The losses on AIGFPs assets more than
offset the net gain on its liabilities that was driven by the
significant widening in AIGs credit spreads. The net gain
on AIGFPs liabilities was reduced by the effect of posting
collateral and the early terminations of GIAs, term notes and
hybrid term notes. Included in the 2008 operating loss is the
transition amount of $291 million related to the adoption
of FAS 157 and FAS 159.
The most significant component of Capital Markets operating
expenses is compensation. Due to the significant losses
recognized by AIGFP during 2008, the entire amount of
$563 million accrued under AIGFPs various deferred
compensation plans and special incentive plan was reversed in
2008. Total compensation expense in 2008 was $426 million
including retention awards.
2007
and 2006 Comparison
Capital Markets reported an operating loss in 2007 compared to
operating income in 2006, primarily due to fourth quarter 2007
unrealized market valuation losses related to AIGFPs super
senior credit default swap portfolio principally written on
multi-sector CDOs and an other-than-temporary impairment charge
on AIGFPs investment portfolio of CDOs of ABS. These
losses were partially offset by the effect of applying hedge
accounting to certain hedging activities beginning in 2007, as
described below, and net unrealized market gains related to
certain credit default swaps purchased against the AAA to
BBB-rated risk layers on portfolios of reference obligations.
AIGFP experienced higher transaction flow in 2007 in its rate
and currency products which contributed to its revenues.
Included in AIGFPs net operating loss was a net unrealized
market valuation gain of $401 million on certain credit
default swaps and embedded credit derivatives in credit-linked
notes in 2007. In these transactions, AIGFP purchased protection
at the AAA - to BBB-rated risk layers on portfolios of reference
obligations that include multi-sector CDO obligations.
118 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
During the fourth quarter of 2007, certain of AIGFPs
available for sale investments in super senior and
AAA-rated
bonds issued by multi-sector CDOs experienced severe declines in
their fair value. As a result, AIGFP recorded an
other-than-temporary impairment charge in other income of
$643 million. Notwithstanding AIGs intent and ability
to hold such securities at such time until they recover in
value, and despite structures which indicated that a substantial
amount of the securities should continue to perform in
accordance with their original terms, AIG concluded that it
could not reasonably assert that the recovery period would be
temporary. See also Investments Financial Services
Invested Assets and Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements.
The change in fair value of AIGFPs credit default swaps
that reference CDOs and the decline in fair value of its
investments in CDOs were caused by the significant widening in
spreads in the fourth quarter on asset-backed securities,
principally those related to U.S. residential mortgages,
the severe liquidity crisis affecting the structured finance
markets and the effects of rating agency downgrades on those
securities.
In addition, in 2007 AIGFP recognized a net gain of
$211 million related to hedging activities that did not
qualify for hedge accounting treatment under FAS 133,
compared to a net loss of $1.82 billion in 2006.
The year ended December 31, 2007 included an out-of-period
charge of $380 million to reverse net gains recognized in
previous periods on transfers of available for sale securities
among legal entities consolidated within AIGFP, and a
$166 million reduction in fair value at March 31, 2007
of certain derivatives that were an integral part of, and
economically hedge, the structured transactions that were
affected by the proposed regulations issued by the United States
Department of the Treasury. The net loss on AIGFPs
derivatives recognized in 2006 included an out-of-period charge
of $223 million related to the remediation of the material
weakness in internal control over accounting for certain
derivative transactions under FAS 133. The net loss also
reflects the effect of increases in U.S. interest rates and
a weakening of the U.S. dollar on derivatives hedging
AIGFPs assets and liabilities.
Financial market conditions in 2007 were characterized by
increases in global interest rates, widening of credit spreads,
higher equity valuations and a slightly weaker U.S. dollar.
The most significant component of Capital Markets operating
expenses is compensation, which was approximately
$423 million and $544 million in 2007 and 2006,
respectively. The amount of compensation was not affected by
gains and losses arising from derivatives not qualifying for
hedge accounting treatment under FAS 133.
Asset
Management Operations
AIGs Asset Management operations comprise a wide variety
of investment-related services and investment products. These
services and products are offered to individuals, pension funds
and institutions (including AIG subsidiaries) globally through
AIGs Spread-Based Investment business, Institutional Asset
Management, and Brokerage Services and Mutual Funds businesses.
Also included in Asset Management operations are the results of
certain SunAmerica sponsored partnership investments.
The revenues and operating income (loss) for this segment are
affected by the general conditions in the equity and credit
markets. In addition, net realized gains and carried interest
are contingent upon various fund closings, maturity levels and
market conditions. In the Institutional Asset Management
business, carried interest, computed in accordance with each
funds governing agreement, is based on the
investments performance over the life of each fund.
Unrealized carried interest is recognized based on each
funds performance as of the balance sheet date. Future
fund performance may negatively affect previously recognized
carried interest.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 119
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Asset
Management Results
Asset Management results were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Percentage Increase/(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008 vs. 2007
|
|
|
2007 vs. 2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spread-Based Investment business
|
|
$
|
(6,918
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,023
|
|
|
$
|
2,713
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(25
|
)%
|
Institutional Asset Management
|
|
|
1,938
|
|
|
|
2,900
|
|
|
|
1,240
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
134
|
|
Brokerage Services and Mutual Funds
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
10
|
|
Other Asset Management
|
|
|
181
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(4,526
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,625
|
|
|
$
|
4,543
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
24
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spread-Based Investment business
|
|
$
|
(8,543
|
)
|
|
$
|
(89
|
)
|
|
$
|
732
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
|
%
|
Institutional Asset Management
|
|
|
(848
|
)
|
|
|
784
|
|
|
|
438
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
Brokerage Services and Mutual Funds
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
(72
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
Other Asset Management
|
|
|
176
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(9,187
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,164
|
|
|
$
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(24
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 and
2007 Comparison
Asset Management recognized an operating loss in 2008 compared
to operating income in 2007, primarily due to higher
other-than-temporary impairment charges on fixed maturity
securities, higher mark-to-market losses on unhedged
derivatives, significantly lower partnership income, higher
equity losses and realized losses on real estate investments,
and lower net carried interest revenues. Partially offsetting
these declines were increases in net foreign exchange gains on
foreign currency denominated GIC and MIP liabilities. Included
in the Institutional Asset Management operating income during
2007 was a gain on the sale of a portion of AIGs
investment in The Blackstone Group L.P. (Blackstone) in
connection with its initial public offering.
As noted in the Asset Disposition section of Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations, certain businesses within the Asset Management
segment are being divested. The $9.2 billion operating loss
for 2008 includes approximately $4.5 billion in net
operating losses related to businesses which are expected to be
retained by AIG, including the MIP. AIG will retain the
businesses that manage the short duration asset and liability
management and traditional fixed income investment services for
the insurance companies.
2007 and
2006 Comparison
Asset Management revenues increased in 2007 compared to 2006
primarily due to increased partnership income, management fees,
and carried interest.
Asset Management operating income decreased in 2007 compared to
2006, due to foreign exchange, interest rate and credit-related
mark-to-market losses and other-than-temporary impairment
charges on fixed income investments. These other-than-temporary
impairment charges were due primarily to changes in market
liquidity and spreads. Partially offsetting these decreases were
higher partnership income, increased gains on real estate
investments and a gain of $398 million on the sale of a
portion of AIGs investment in Blackstone in connection
with its initial public offering. Revenues increased in 2007
compared to 2006 periods as a result of consolidating several
warehoused investments. AIG consolidates the operating results
of warehoused investments until such time as they are sold or
otherwise divested. A portion of these amounts is offset in
minority interest expense, which is not a component of operating
income (loss).
120 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Spread-Based
Investment Business Results
2008
and 2007 Comparison
The Spread-Based Investment business reported increased
operating losses in 2008 compared to 2007 due to significantly
higher net realized capital losses and lower partnership income.
Net realized capital losses were $8.6 billion in 2008
compared to $1.3 billion in 2007. The increase in net
realized capital losses for 2008 primarily consists of an
increase of $6.4 billion in other-than-temporary impairment
charges on fixed maturity securities for both the GIC and MIP,
higher net mark-to-market losses of $1.2 billion on
interest rate and foreign exchange hedges not qualifying for
hedge accounting treatment for both the GIC and MIP and higher
net mark-to-market losses of $374 million on credit default
swap investments held by the MIP due to the widening of
corporate credit spreads. The MIP credit default swaps are
comprised of single-name investment grade corporate exposures.
AIG enters into derivative arrangements to hedge the effect of
changes in currency and interest rates associated with the fixed
and floating rate and foreign currency denominated obligations
issued under these programs. Some of these hedging relationships
qualify for hedge accounting treatment, while others do not, and
although being effective economic hedges, creates volatility in
operating results. Partially offsetting these declines were
increased net foreign exchange gains on foreign denominated GIC
reserves and MIP liabilities of $1.3 billion.
The increase in other-than-temporary impairment charges on fixed
maturity securities held in the GIC and MIP portfolios were
$3.2 billion for the GIC and $3.2 billion for the MIP
in 2008, primarily resulting from severity and credit losses and
the change in AIGs intent to hold securities to recovery
related to both the U.S. securities lending portfolio and
its general portfolios. See Investments Portfolio
Review Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.
In the GIC program, income from partnership investments
decreased $1.4 billion for 2008 compared to 2007 due to
significantly higher returns in the 2007 period and weaker
market conditions in 2008. GIC income was also affected by
higher net mark-to-market losses of $676 million on
interest rate and foreign exchange hedges not qualifying for
hedge accounting treatment. Offsetting these declines were net
foreign exchange gains on foreign-denominated GIC reserves which
increased by $1.2 billion in 2008 compared to 2007 as a
result of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar. As noted
below, a significant portion of these GIC reserves mature in the
next twelve months. The derivative losses included net
mark-to-market losses on interest rate and foreign exchange
derivatives used to economically hedge the effect of interest
rate and foreign exchange rate movements on GIC reserves.
Although these economic hedges are partially effective in
hedging the interest rate and foreign exchange risk, AIG has not
applied hedge accounting treatment.
The MIP recognized an operating loss, due to net realized
capital losses, of $4.8 billion in 2008, and an operating
loss of $794 million in 2007.
AIG did not issue any additional debt to fund the MIP in 2008
and does not intend to issue any additional debt for the
foreseeable future. Through December 31, 2008, the MIP had
cumulative debt issuances of $13.4 billion. During 2007,
AIG issued the equivalent of $8.1 billion of securities to
fund the MIP in the Euromarkets and the U.S. public and
private markets. See Note 13 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for a schedule of maturities of the MIP debt.
The GIC program is in runoff with no new GICs issued
subsequent to 2005. The anticipated runoff of the domestic GIC
portfolio was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than
|
|
|
1-3
|
|
|
3+-5
|
|
|
Over Five
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
One Year
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In billions)
|
|
|
Domestic GICs
|
|
$
|
6.0
|
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
3.0
|
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
$
|
14.8
|
|
2007
and 2006 Comparison
The Spread-Based Investment business reported an operating loss
in 2007 compared to operating income in 2006 due to foreign
exchange, interest rate and credit-related mark-to-market losses
and other-than-temporary impairment charges on fixed income
investments, partially offset by increased partnership income.
In 2007, the GIC program incurred foreign exchange losses of
$526 million on foreign-denominated GIC reserves. Partially
offsetting these losses were $269 million of net
mark-to-market gains on derivative positions. These net gains
included mark-to-market gains on foreign exchange derivatives
used to economically hedge the effect of foreign
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 121
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
exchange rate movements on foreign-denominated GIC reserves and
mark-to-market losses on interest rate hedges that did not
qualify for hedge accounting treatment.
The MIP experienced mark-to-market losses of $193 million
due to interest rate and foreign exchange derivative positions
that, while partially effective in hedging interest rate and
foreign exchange risk, did not qualify for hedge accounting
treatment and an additional $98 million due to credit
default swap losses. The mark-to-market losses for 2007 were
driven primarily by a decline in short-term interest rates, the
decline in the value of the U.S. dollar and widening credit
spreads.
Also contributing to the operating loss were
other-than-temporary impairment charges on various fixed
maturity investments held in the GIC and MIP portfolios of
approximately $836 million as a result of movements in
credit spreads and decreased market liquidity. See
Investments Portfolio Review
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments. These losses were partially
offset by an increase in partnership income associated with the
GIC.
Institutional
Asset Management Results
2008
and 2007 Comparison
Institutional Asset Management recognized an operating loss in
2008 compared to operating income in 2007, primarily resulting
from the difficult market conditions in 2008 in the private
equity, hedge fund and real estate environments. The operating
loss reflects higher net equity losses and impairment charges of
$330 million and lower net realized capital gains of
$211 million on real estate investments, and lower carried
interest of $209 million. Due to the current global real
estate market conditions, several of AIG Global Real
Estates investments were deemed to be impaired, and
several equity investments were written off during 2008. These
impairments and write-offs totaled $269 million. The
reduction in carried interest revenues was driven by lower net
unrealized carry due to higher fund performance in 2007 and
significantly lower fund performance in 2008.
Increased losses from warehoused investments of $92 million
were incurred as such investments were not able to be sold or
otherwise divested as originally contemplated. Such assets are
now considered proprietary investments of the Institutional
Asset Management business. Total operating losses including
funding costs from these investments for 2008 and 2007 were
$257 million and $165 million, respectively, with 2008
reflecting a full-year of such losses compared to a partial year
in 2007. Of these operating losses, $142 million and
$35 million for 2008 and 2007, respectively, are offset in
minority interest expense, which is not a component of operating
income (loss).
Additional losses resulted from a decrease in securities lending
fees of $60 million as the U.S. securities lending
program was terminated and restructuring-related expenses of
$43 million primarily related to employee-related costs
associated with the intended divestment of various asset
management businesses, including AIG Private Bank. Included in
the 2007 results was a $398 million gain related to the
sale of a portion of AIGs investment in Blackstone.
AIGs unaffiliated client assets under management,
including retail mutual funds and institutional accounts, were
$68.9 billion and $97.6 billion at December 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The decline from
December 31, 2007 reflects lower asset values due to the
significant deterioration in the credit and equity markets
during 2008 as well as the effect of net client outflows.
Although there was a significant decline in end of period
unaffiliated client assets under management, average assets
under management decreased nominally in 2008 compared to 2007
and resulted in slightly lower base management fees.
2007
and 2006 Comparison
Operating income for Institutional Asset Management increased in
2007 compared to 2006 reflecting increased carried interest
revenues driven by higher valuations of portfolio investments
that are generally associated with improved performance in the
equity markets. The increase also reflects the $398 million
gain from the sale of a portion of AIGs investment in
Blackstone in connection with its initial public offering. Also
contributing to this increase were higher base management fees
driven by higher levels of third-party assets under management.
Partially offsetting these increases were the operating losses
from warehousing activities. The consolidated warehoused private
equity investments are not wholly owned by AIG and thus, a
significant portion of the effect of consolidating these
operating losses is offset in minority interest, which is not a
component of operating income.
122 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Brokerage
Services and Mutual Funds
Revenues and operating income related to Brokerage Services and
Mutual Fund activities decreased in 2008 from 2007 due to lower
fee income as a result of a lower asset base and a decline in
commission income resulting from difficult market conditions. In
addition, restructuring expenses of $24 million were
recorded in 2008 primarily related to employee costs.
Other
Asset Management Results
Revenues and operating income related to Other Asset Management
activities declined in 2008 from 2007 and increased in 2007 from
2006, due to changes in partnership income driven by weaker
market conditions in 2008 and 2006 compared to strong market
conditions in 2007.
Critical
Accounting Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America (GAAP) requires the application of accounting policies
that often involve a significant degree of judgment. AIG
considers that its accounting policies that are most dependent
on the application of estimates and assumptions, and therefore
viewed as critical accounting estimates, to be those relating to
items considered by management in the determination of
AIGs ability to continue as a going concern, liability for
general insurance unpaid claims and claims adjustment expenses,
future policy benefits for life and accident and health
contracts, recoverability of DAC, estimated gross profits for
investment-oriented products, the allowance for finance
receivable losses, flight equipment recoverability,
other-than-temporary impairments, goodwill impairment, estimates
with respect to income taxes and fair value measurements of
certain financial assets and liabilities, including credit
default swaps. These accounting estimates require the use of
assumptions about matters, some of which are highly uncertain at
the time of estimation. To the extent actual experience differs
from the assumptions used, AIGs results of operations
would be directly affected.
The major categories for which assumptions are developed and
used to establish each critical accounting estimate are
highlighted below.
AIGs
Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
When assessing AIGs ability to continue as a going
concern, management must make judgments and estimates about the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
the marketability of assets to be disposed of and the timing and
amount of related cash proceeds to be used to repay indebtedness;
|
|
|
|
plans to raise new funds or restructure debt;
|
|
|
|
projections of future profitability and the timing and amount of
cash flows from operating activities;
|
|
|
|
the funding needs of regulated subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
AIGs ability to comply with debt covenants;
|
|
|
|
plans to reduce expenditures;
|
|
|
|
the effects of ratings agency actions on collateral requirements
and other contractual conditions; and
|
|
|
|
the future regulatory, business, credit, and competitive
environments in which AIG operates around the world.
|
These factors individually and collectively will have a
significant effect on AIGs ability to generate sufficient
cash to repay indebtedness as it becomes due and profitably
operate its businesses as it executes its restructuring
initiatives.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 123
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Liability
for Unpaid Claims and Claims Adjustment Expenses (General
Insurance):
|
|
|
|
|
Loss trend factors: used to establish expected
loss ratios for subsequent accident years based on premium rate
adequacy and the projected loss ratio with respect to prior
accident years.
|
|
|
|
Expected loss ratios for the latest accident
year: in this case, accident year 2008 for the
year-end 2008 loss reserve analysis. For low-frequency,
high-severity classes such as excess casualty, expected loss
ratios generally are utilized for at least the three most recent
accident years.
|
|
|
|
Loss development factors: used to project the
reported losses for each accident year to an ultimate amount.
|
|
|
|
Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses: the
expected recoveries from reinsurers on losses that have not yet
been reported
and/or
settled.
|
For discussion of sensitivity analysis on the reserve for unpaid
claims and claims adjustment expenses, see Results of
Operations Segment Results General
Insurance Operations Liability for Unpaid Claims and
Claims Adjustment Expense.
Future
Policy Benefits for Life and Accident and Health Contracts (Life
Insurance & Retirement Services):
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rates: which vary by geographical
region, year of issuance and products.
|
|
|
|
Mortality, morbidity and surrender
rates: based upon actual experience by
geographical region modified to allow for variation in policy
form, risk classification and distribution channel.
|
Periodically, the net benefit reserves (policy benefit reserves
less DAC) established for Life Insurance & Retirement
Services companies are tested to ensure that, including
consideration of future expected premium payments, they are
adequate to provide for future policyholder benefit obligations.
The assumptions used to perform the tests are current
best-estimate assumptions as to policyholder mortality,
morbidity, terminations, company maintenance expenses and
invested asset returns. For long duration traditional business,
a lock-in principle applies, whereby the assumptions
used to calculate the benefit reserves and DAC are set when a
policy is issued and do not change with changes in actual
experience. These assumptions include margins for adverse
deviation in the event that actual experience might deviate from
these assumptions. For business in-force outside of North
America, 52 percent of total policyholder benefit
liabilities at December 31, 2008 resulted from traditional
business where the lock-in principle applies. In most foreign
locations, various guarantees are embedded in policies in force
that may remain applicable for many decades into the future.
As experience changes over time, the best-estimate assumptions
are updated to reflect observed changes. Because of the
long-term nature of many of AIGs liabilities subject to
the lock-in principle, small changes in certain of the
assumptions may cause large changes in the degree of reserve
adequacy. In particular, changes in estimates of future invested
asset return assumptions have a large effect on the degree of
reserve adequacy.
Deferred
Policy Acquisition Costs (Life Insurance & Retirement
Services):
|
|
|
|
|
Recoverability: based on current and future
expected profitability, which is affected by interest rates,
foreign exchange rates, mortality/morbidity experience,
expenses, investment returns and policy persistency.
|
Deferred
Policy Acquisition Costs (General Insurance):
|
|
|
|
|
Recoverability: based upon the current terms
and profitability of the underlying insurance contracts.
|
Estimated
Gross Profits for Investment-Oriented Products (Life
Insurance & Retirement Services):
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated gross profits: to be realized over
the estimated duration of the contracts (investment-oriented
products) affect the carrying value of DAC, unearned revenue
liability, SIAs and associated amortization patterns. Estimated
gross profits include investment income and gains and losses on
investments less required interest, actual mortality and other
expenses.
|
124 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Allowance
for Finance Receivable Losses (Financial
Services):
|
|
|
|
|
Historical defaults and delinquency
experience: utilizing factors, such as
delinquency ratio, allowance ratio, charge-off ratio and
charge-off coverage.
|
|
|
|
Portfolio characteristics: portfolio
composition and consideration of the recent changes to
underwriting criteria and portfolio seasoning.
|
|
|
|
External factors: consideration of current
economic conditions, including levels of unemployment and
personal bankruptcies.
|
|
|
|
Migration analysis: empirical technique
measuring historical movement of similar finance receivables
through various levels of repayment, delinquency, and loss
categories to existing finance receivable pools.
|
Flight
Equipment Recoverability (Financial Services):
|
|
|
|
|
Expected undiscounted future net cash
flows: based upon current lease rates, projected
future lease rates and estimated terminal values of each
aircraft based on expectations of market participants.
|
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments:
AIG evaluates its available for sale, equity method and cost
method investments for impairment such that a security is
considered a candidate for other-than-temporary
impairment if it meets any of the following criteria:
|
|
|
|
|
Trading at a significant (25 percent or more) discount to
par, amortized cost (if lower) or cost for an extended period of
time (nine consecutive months or longer);
|
|
|
|
The occurrence of a discrete credit event resulting in
(i) the issuer defaulting on a material outstanding
obligation; (ii) the issuer seeking protection from
creditors under the bankruptcy laws or any similar laws intended
for court supervised reorganization of insolvent enterprises; or
(iii) the issuer proposing a voluntary reorganization
pursuant to which creditors are asked to exchange their claims
for cash or securities having a fair value substantially lower
than par value of their claims; or
|
|
|
|
AIG may not realize a full recovery on its investment,
regardless of the occurrence of one of the foregoing events.
|
The determination that a security has incurred an
other-than-temporary decline in value requires the judgment of
management and consideration of the fundamental condition of the
issuer, its near-term prospects and all the relevant facts and
circumstances. The above criteria also consider circumstances of
a rapid and severe market valuation decline, such as that
experienced in current credit markets, in which AIG could not
reasonably assert that the impairment period would be temporary
(severity losses). For further discussion, see
Investments Portfolio Review
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments.
At each balance sheet date, AIG evaluates its available for sale
securities holdings with unrealized losses. When AIG does not
intend to hold or lacks the ability to hold such securities
until they have recovered their cost basis, AIG records the
unrealized loss in income. If a loss is recognized from a sale
subsequent to a balance sheet date pursuant to changes in
circumstances, the loss is recognized in the period in which the
intent to hold the securities to recovery no longer existed.
In periods subsequent to the recognition of an
other-than-temporary impairment charge for fixed maturity
securities, which is not credit or foreign exchange related, AIG
generally accretes into income the discount or amortizes the
reduced premium resulting from the reduction in cost basis over
the remaining life of the security.
Goodwill
Impairment
Goodwill is the excess of the cost of an acquired business over
the fair value of the identifiable net assets of the acquired
business. Goodwill is tested for impairment annually, or more
frequently if circumstances indicate an impairment may have
occurred. During 2008, AIG performed goodwill impairment tests
at June 30, September 30, and December 31.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 125
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
The impairment assessment involves a two-step process in which
an initial assessment for potential impairment is performed and,
if potential impairment is present, the amount of impairment is
measured and recorded. Impairment is tested at the reporting
unit level or, when all reporting units that comprise an
operating segment have similar economic characteristics,
impairment is tested at the operating segment level.
Management initially assesses the potential for impairment by
estimating the fair value of each of AIGs reporting units
or operating segments and comparing the estimated fair values
with the carrying amounts of those reporting units, including
allocated goodwill. The estimate of a reporting units fair
value may be based on one or a combination of approaches
including market-based earning multiples of the units peer
companies, discounted expected future cash flows, external
appraisals or, in the case of reporting units being considered
for sale, third-party indications of fair value, if available.
Management considers one or more of these estimates when
determining the fair value of a reporting unit to be used in the
impairment test. As part of the impairment test, management
compares the sum of the estimated fair values of AIGs
reporting units with AIGs fully diluted common stock
market capitalization as a basis for concluding on the
reasonableness of the estimated reporting unit fair values.
If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its
carrying value, goodwill is not impaired. If the carrying value
of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, goodwill
associated with that reporting unit potentially is impaired. The
amount of impairment, if any, is measured as the excess of the
carrying value of goodwill over the estimated fair value of the
goodwill. The estimated fair value of the goodwill is measured
as the excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the
amounts that would be assigned to the reporting units
assets and liabilities in a hypothetical business combination.
An impairment charge is recognized in income to the extent of
the excess. During 2008, AIG recorded an aggregate goodwill
impairment charge of $4.1 billion. This impairment charge
was primarily attributable to declines in estimated fair values
of reporting units in the Property and Casualty Group, Domestic
Life Insurance and Domestic Retirement Services, Consumer
Finance and Capital Markets businesses attributable to the
uncertain economic environment during the 2008 fourth quarter.
Management observed a narrowing of the fair values over the
carrying values of the Foreign General Insurance and
Institutional Asset Management reporting units during the fourth
quarter of 2008. Fair value exceeded book value in the Foreign
General Insurance, Foreign Life Insurance & Retirements
Services Japan & Other, and Institutional Asset
Management reporting units as of December 31, 2008;
therefore, the goodwill of these reporting units was considered
not impaired. AIGs stock price, along with the stock
prices of other companies in the financial services industry,
including insurers, has continued to decline in 2009. AIG will
continue to monitor overall competitive, business and economic
conditions, and other events or circumstances that might result
in an impairment of goodwill in the future.
Valuation
Allowance on Deferred Tax Assets:
At December 31, 2008, AIG recorded a net deferred tax asset
after valuation allowance of $11 billion compared to a net
deferred tax liability of $5.3 billion at December 31,
2007. SFAS 109 permits this asset to be recorded if the
asset meets a more likely than not standard (i.e. more than
50 percent likely) that the asset will be realized.
Realization of AIGs net deferred tax asset depends on
AIGs ability to generate sufficient future taxable income
of the appropriate character within carryforward periods of the
jurisdictions in which the net operating and capital losses, tax
credits and deductible temporary differences were incurred.
Because the realization of the deferred tax asset relies on a
projection of future income, AIG views this as a critical
accounting estimate.
In making this estimate, AIG considered its ability to execute
its divestiture plan at the values anticipated and within the
timeframe expected. The realization of the deferred tax asset is
highly dependent on the ability of AIG to generate significant
gains from these transactions.
AIG is also relying upon producing taxable operating profits
from the businesses to be retained, principally Commercial
Insurance and Foreign General Insurance. AIG has evaluated its
forecasts of future operating income and determined that there
would be sufficient operating income, inclusive of gains on the
divestiture of businesses. There are many risk factors that
could affect the attainment of AIGs budgeted results. See
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
When making its assessment about the realization of its deferred
tax assets at December 31, 2008, AIG considered all available
evidence, including (i) the nature, frequency, and severity of
current and cumulative financial reporting losses, (ii) actions
completed during 2008 and expected to be completed during 2009
that are
126 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
designed to eliminate or limit a recurrence of the factors that
contributed to the recent cumulative losses, giving greater
weight to actions completed through December 31, 2008 and
to the expectation that strategies will be executed in 2009 to
mitigate credit losses in the future on certain classes of
invested assets, (iii) the carryforward periods for the net
operating and capital loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards,
(iv) the sources and timing of future taxable income, giving
greater weight to discrete sources and to earlier future years
in the forecast period, and (v) tax planning strategies that
would be implemented, if necessary, to accelerate taxable
amounts.
In assessing future GAAP taxable income, AIG considered its
strong earnings history exclusive of the recent losses on the
AIGFP super senior credit default swap portfolio and from the
securities lending program. AIG also considered the completed
transactions with the NY Fed and the United States Department of
the Treasury, including (i) amendment to the Fed Credit
Agreement designed to reduce the interest rate payable on
outstanding borrowing and undrawn amounts; (ii) the transfer of
RMBS related to AIGs U.S. securities lending program to
ML II; and (iii) the termination of multi-sector
credit default swap transactions and sale of underlying CDOs to
ML III.
In addition, AIG also considered the proposed transactions with
the NY Fed and the United States Department of the Treasury
announced on March 2, 2009, including (i) the modification
of the terms of the Series D Preferred Stock;
(ii) establishment of a equity capital commitment facility
for the sales of Series F Preferred Stock to the United
States Department of the Treasury, along with warrants to
purchase shares of common stock; and (iii) amendment to the Fed
Credit Agreement designed to reduce the interest rate payable on
outstanding borrowing by revising the LIBOR floor. These
transactions are designed to enhance AIGs ability to
generate taxable income from the sales of businesses under its
asset disposition plan, continue the earnings strength of the
insurance businesses it intends to sell, and underscore the
United States Governments commitment to the orderly
restructuring of AIG over time in the face of continuing market
dislocations and economic deterioration.
The forecast of taxable income was prepared using budgets
submitted by each of AIGs significant operating units for
management planning purposes and is consistent with the forecast
used in AIGs going concern analysis. AIGs
profitability in any given period can be materially affected by
conditions in global financial markets, economic conditions,
catastrophes and other events around the world and, currently,
AIG-specific events. Further, the results of operations in the
first quarter of 2009 may not be indicative of the results
expected for the full year because the transactions being
discussed with the United States Department of the Treasury and
the NY Fed are not expected to be in place. However, AIG
believes its forecasts are achievable.
Income
Taxes on Earnings of Certain Foreign Subsidiaries:
In connection with AIGs asset disposition plan, AIG
determined it can no longer assert that earnings of its foreign
subsidiaries will be indefinitely reinvested. Due to the
complexity of the U.S. federal income tax laws involved in
determining the amount of income taxes incurred on these
potential dispositions, as well as AIGs reliance on
reasonable assumptions and estimates in calculating this
liability, AIG considers the U.S. federal income taxes
accrued on the earnings of certain foreign subsidiaries to be a
critical accounting estimate.
Fair
Value Measurements of Certain Financial Assets and
Liabilities:
Overview
AIG measures at fair value on a recurring basis financial
instruments in its trading and available for sale securities
portfolios, certain mortgage and other loans receivable, certain
spot commodities, derivative assets and liabilities, securities
purchased (sold) under agreements to resell (repurchase),
securities lending invested collateral, non-marketable equity
investments included in other invested assets, certain
policyholder contract deposits, securities and spot commodities
sold but not yet purchased, certain trust deposits and deposits
due to banks and other depositors, certain long-term debt, and
certain hybrid financial instruments included in other
liabilities. The fair value of a financial instrument is the
amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to
transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing,
able and knowledgeable market participants at the measurement
date.
The degree of judgment used in measuring the fair value of
financial instruments generally correlates with the level of
pricing observability. Financial instruments with quoted prices
in active markets generally have more pricing observability and
less judgment is used in measuring fair value. Conversely,
financial instruments traded in
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 127
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
other-than-active markets or that do not have quoted prices have
less observability and are measured at fair value using
valuation models or other pricing techniques that require more
judgment. An active market is one in which transactions for the
asset or liability being valued occur with sufficient frequency
and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.
An other-than-active market is one in which there are few
transactions, the prices are not current, price quotations vary
substantially either over time or among market makers, or in
which little information is released publicly for the asset or
liability being valued. Pricing observability is affected by a
number of factors, including the type of financial instrument,
whether the financial instrument is new to the market and not
yet established, the characteristics specific to the transaction
and general market conditions.
AIG management is responsible for the determination of the value
of the financial assets and financial liabilities carried at
fair value and the supporting methodologies and assumptions.
With respect to securities, AIG employs independent third-party
valuation service providers to gather, analyze, and interpret
market information and derive fair values based upon relevant
methodologies and assumptions for individual instruments. When
AIGs valuation service providers are unable to obtain
sufficient market observable information upon which to estimate
the fair value for a particular security, fair value is
determined either by requesting brokers who are knowledgeable
about these securities to provide a quote, which is generally
non-binding, or by employing widely accepted internal valuation
models.
Valuation service providers typically obtain data about market
transactions and other key valuation model inputs from multiple
sources and, through the use of widely accepted internal
valuation models, provide a single fair value measurement for
individual securities for which a fair value has been requested
under the terms of service agreements. The inputs used by the
valuation service providers include, but are not limited to,
market prices from recently completed transactions and
transactions of comparable securities, interest rate yield
curves, credit spreads, currency rates, and other
market-observable information, as applicable. The valuation
models take into account, among other things, market observable
information as of the measurement date as well as the specific
attributes of the security being valued including its term,
interest rate, credit rating, industry sector, and when
applicable, collateral quality and other issue or
issuer-specific information. When market transactions or other
market observable data is limited, the extent to which judgment
is applied in determining fair value is greatly increased.
AIG employs specific control processes to determine the
reasonableness of the fair values of AIGs financial assets
and financial liabilities. AIGs processes are designed to
ensure that the values received or internally estimated are
accurately recorded and that the data inputs and the valuation
techniques utilized are appropriate, consistently applied, and
that the assumptions are reasonable and consistent with the
objective of determining fair value. AIG assesses the
reasonableness of individual security values received from
valuation service providers through various analytical
techniques. In addition, AIG may validate the reasonableness of
fair values by comparing information obtained from AIGs
valuation service providers to other third-party valuation
sources for selected securities. AIG also validates prices for
selected securities obtained from brokers through reviews by
members of management who have relevant expertise and who are
independent of those charged with executing investing
transactions.
The fair value of fixed income and equity securities by
source of value determination was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
Value
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
(In billions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value based on external sources(a)
|
|
$
|
387
|
|
|
|
91
|
%
|
Fair value based on internal sources
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed income and equity securities(b)
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes $45.8 billion whose primary source is broker
quotes. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes available for sale, trading and securities lending
invested collateral securities. |
128 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
more detailed information about AIGs accounting policy for
the incorporation of credit risk in fair value measurements and
the measurement of fair value of the following financial assets
and financial liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities;
|
|
|
|
Equity securities traded in active markets trading
and available for sale;
|
|
|
|
Non-traded equity investments other invested assets;
|
|
|
|
Private limited partnership and hedge fund
investments other invested assets;
|
|
|
|
Separate account assets;
|
|
|
|
Freestanding derivatives;
|
|
|
|
Embedded policy derivatives;
|
|
|
|
AIGFPs super senior credit default swap portfolio; and
|
|
|
|
Policyholder contract deposits.
|
Level 3
Assets and Liabilities
Under FAS 157, assets and liabilities recorded at fair
value in the consolidated balance sheet are classified in a
hierarchy for disclosure purposes consisting of three
levels based on the observability of inputs
available in the marketplace used to measure the fair value. See
Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional information about fair value measurements.
At December 31, 2008, AIG classified $42.1 billion and
$21.1 billion of assets and liabilities, respectively, measured
at fair value on a recurring basis as Level 3. This
represented 4.9 percent and 2.6 percent of the total
assets and liabilities, respectively, measured at fair value on
a recurring basis. Level 3 fair value measurements are
based on valuation techniques that use at least one significant
input that is unobservable. These measurements are made under
circumstances in which there is little, if any, market activity
for the asset or liability. AIGs assessment of the
significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement
in its entirety requires judgment.
In making the assessment, AIG considers factors specific to the
asset or liability. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure
fair value of an asset or a liability may fall into different
levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in
the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement
in its entirety is classified is determined based on the lowest
level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in
its entirety.
Valuation
of Level 3 Assets and Liabilities
AIG values its assets and liabilities classified as Level 3
using judgment and valuation models or other pricing techniques
that require a variety of inputs including contractual terms,
market prices and rates, yield curves, credit curves, measures
of volatility, prepayment rates and correlations of such inputs,
some of which may be unobservable. The following paragraphs
describe the methods AIG uses to measure on a recurring basis
the fair value of the major classes of assets and liabilities
classified in Level 3.
Private equity and real estate fund
investments: These assets initially are valued at
the transaction price, i.e., the price paid to acquire the
asset. Subsequently, they are measured based on net asset value
using information provided by the general partner or manager of
these investments, the accounts of which generally are audited
on an annual basis. AIG considers observable market data and
performs diligence procedures in validating the appropriateness
of using the net asset value as a fair value measurement.
Corporate bonds and private placement
debt: These assets initially are valued at the
transaction price. Subsequently, they are valued using market
data for similar instruments (e.g., recent transactions, bond
spreads or credit default swap spreads), comparisons to
benchmark derivative indices or movements in underlying credit
spreads. When observable price quotations are not available,
fair value is determined based on cash flow models with yield
curves, bond or single-name credit default swap spreads and
estimated recovery rates.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 129
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Certain Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities (RMBS) and
Commercial Mortgage-Backed Securities (CMBS): These assets
initially are valued at the transaction price. Subsequently,
they may be valued by comparison to transactions in instruments
with similar collateral and risk profiles, remittances received
and updated cumulative loss data on underlying obligations,
discounted cash flow techniques,
and/or for
RMBS option adjusted spread analyses.
Certain Asset-Backed Securities
non-mortgage: These assets initially are valued
at the transaction price. Subsequently, they may be valued based
on external price/spread data. When position-specific external
price data are not observable, the valuation is based on prices
of comparable securities.
CDOs: These assets initially are valued at the
transaction price. Subsequently, they are valued based on
external price/spread data from independent third parties,
dealer quotations, matrix pricing, the BET model or a
combination thereof.
Interests in ML II and ML III: At
their inception, AIGs economic interest in ML II and
membership interest in ML III (Maiden Lane Interests) were
valued at the transaction prices of $1 billion and
$5 billion, respectively. Subsequently, Maiden Lane
Interests are valued using a discounted cash flow methodology
that uses the estimated future cash flows of the assets to which
the Maiden Lane Interests are entitled and the discount rates
applicable to such interests as derived from the fair value of
the entire asset pool. The implicit discount rates are
calibrated to the changes in the estimated asset values for the
underlying assets commensurate with AIGs interests in the
capital structure of the respective entities. Estimated cash
flows and discount rates used in the valuations are validated,
to the extent possible, using market observable information for
securities with similar asset pools, structure and terms.
See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
further discussion.
AIGFPs Super Senior Credit Default Swap
Portfolio: AIGFP wrote credit protection on the
super senior risk layer of collateralized loan obligations
(CLOs), multi-sector CDOs and diversified portfolios of
corporate debt, and prime residential mortgages. In these
transactions, AIGFP is at risk of credit performance on the
super senior risk layer related to such assets. These
transactions placed a significant demand on AIGFPs
liquidity during 2008, primarily as a result of their collateral
posting provisions (see General Contractual Terms below). To a
lesser extent, AIGFP also wrote protection on tranches below the
super senior risk layer, primarily in respect of regulatory
capital relief transactions.
As discussed under Arbitrage Portfolio and ML III
Transaction below, during the fourth quarter of 2008, AIG
Financial Products Corp. terminated the vast majority of the
credit default swaps it had written on multi-sector CDOs. See
Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further
discussion.
The net notional amount, fair value of derivative liability
and unrealized market valuation loss of the AIGFP super senior
credit default swap portfolio, including credit default swaps
written on mezzanine tranches of certain regulatory capital
relief transactions, by asset class were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Unrealized Market
|
|
|
|
Net Notional Amount
|
|
|
Of Derivative
|
|
|
Valuation Loss
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Liability at December 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31(a),
|
|
|
|
2008(b)
|
|
|
2007(b)
|
|
|
2008(c)
|
|
|
2007(c)
|
|
|
2008(d)
|
|
|
2007(d)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Regulatory Capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate loans
|
|
$
|
125,628
|
|
|
$
|
229,313
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Prime residential mortgages
|
|
|
107,246
|
|
|
|
149,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other(e)
|
|
|
1,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
234,449
|
|
|
|
378,743
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
130 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Unrealized Market
|
|
|
|
Net Notional Amount
|
|
|
Of Derivative
|
|
|
Valuation Loss
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Liability at December 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31(a),
|
|
|
|
2008(b)
|
|
|
2007(b)
|
|
|
2008(c)
|
|
|
2007(c)
|
|
|
2008(d)
|
|
|
2007(d)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Arbitrage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-sector CDOs(f)
|
|
|
12,556
|
|
|
|
78,205
|
|
|
|
5,906
|
|
|
|
11,246
|
|
|
|
25,700
|
|
|
|
11,246
|
|
Corporate debt/CLOs(g)
|
|
|
50,495
|
|
|
|
70,425
|
|
|
|
2,554
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
2,328
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
63,051
|
|
|
|
148,630
|
|
|
|
8,460
|
|
|
|
11,472
|
|
|
|
28,028
|
|
|
|
11,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mezzanine tranches(h)
|
|
|
4,701
|
|
|
|
5,770
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
302,201
|
|
|
$
|
533,143
|
|
|
$
|
9,034
|
|
|
$
|
11,472
|
|
|
$
|
28,602
|
|
|
$
|
11,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
There were no unrealized market valuation losses in 2006. |
|
(b) |
|
Net notional amounts presented are net of all structural
subordination below the covered tranches. |
|
(c) |
|
Fair value amounts are shown before the effects of
counterparty netting adjustments and offsetting cash collateral
in accordance with FIN 39. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes credit valuation adjustment gains of
$185 million in 2008 representing the positive effect of
AIGs widening credit spreads on the valuation of the
derivatives liabilities. AIGFP began reflecting this valuation
adjustment as a result of the adoption of SFAS 157 on
January 1, 2008. Prior to January 1, 2008, a credit
valuation adjustment was not reflected in the valuation of
AIGFPs liabilities. |
|
(e) |
|
During 2008, a European RMBS regulatory capital relief
transaction was not terminated as expected when it no longer
provided regulatory capital relief to the counterparty as a
result of arbitrage opportunities arising from its unique
attributes and the counterpartys access to a particular
funding source. |
|
(f) |
|
Includes $9.7 billion in net notional amount of credit
default swaps written with cash settlement provisions at
December 31, 2008. In connection with the terminations of
CDS transactions in respect of the ML III transaction, AIG
Financial Products Corp. paid $32.5 billion through the
surrender of collateral previously posted (net of the
$2.5 billion received pursuant to the shortfall agreement),
of which $2.5 billion (included in Other income (loss)) is
related to certain 2a-7 Put transactions written on multi-sector
CDOs purchased by ML III. |
|
(g) |
|
Includes $1.5 billion of credit default swaps written on
the super senior tranches of CLOs as of December 31,
2008. |
|
(h) |
|
Includes offsetting purchased CDS of $2.0 billion and
$2.7 billion in net notional amount at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. |
The changes in the net notional amount of the AIGFP super
senior credit default swap portfolio, including credit default
swaps written on mezzanine tranches of certain regulatory
capital relief transactions were as follows:
For The
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Notional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Notional
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Terminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
ML III
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
Amortization/
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Maturities
|
|
|
Transaction(a)
|
|
|
Rates(b)
|
|
|
Reclassification
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Regulatory Capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate loans
|
|
$
|
229,313
|
|
|
$
|
(75,480
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(3,554
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,651
|
)
|
|
$
|
125,628
|
|
Prime residential mortgages
|
|
|
149,430
|
|
|
|
(24,222
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,539
|
)
|
|
|
(11,423
|
)
|
|
|
107,246
|
|
Other(c)
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
1,782
|
|
|
|
1,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
378,743
|
|
|
|
(99,702
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10,300
|
)
|
|
|
(34,292
|
)
|
|
|
234,449
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 131
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Notional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Notional
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Terminations
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
ML III
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
Amortization/
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Maturities
|
|
|
Transaction(a)
|
|
|
Rates(b)
|
|
|
Reclassification
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Arbitrage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-sector CDOs
|
|
|
78,205
|
|
|
|
(2,146
|
)
|
|
|
(62,130
|
)
|
|
|
(227
|
)
|
|
|
(1,146
|
)
|
|
|
12,556
|
|
Corporate debt/CLOs
|
|
|
70,425
|
|
|
|
(17,147
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(943
|
)
|
|
|
(1,840
|
)
|
|
|
50,495
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
148,630
|
|
|
|
(19,293
|
)
|
|
|
(62,130
|
)
|
|
|
(1,170
|
)
|
|
|
(2,986
|
)
|
|
|
63,051
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mezzanine tranches
|
|
|
5,770
|
|
|
|
(358
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(529
|
)
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
4,701
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
533,143
|
|
|
$
|
(119,353
|
)
|
|
$
|
(62,130
|
)
|
|
$
|
(11,999
|
)
|
|
$
|
(37,460
|
)
|
|
$
|
302,201
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes $8.5 billion of multi-sector CDOs underlying
2a-7 Puts
written by AIG Financial Products Corp. |
|
(b) |
|
Relates to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar, primarily
against the Euro and the British Pound. |
|
(c) |
|
During 2008, a European RMBS regulatory capital relief
transaction was not terminated as expected when it no longer
provided regulatory capital relief to the counterparty as a
result of arbitrage opportunities arising from its unique
attributes and the counterpartys access to a particular
funding source. |
General
Contractual Terms
AIGFP entered into CDS transactions in the ordinary course of
its business. In the majority of AIGFPs credit derivative
transactions, AIGFP sold credit protection on a designated
portfolio of loans or debt securities. Generally, AIGFP provides
such credit protection on a second loss basis,
meaning that AIGFP will incur credit losses only after a
shortfall of principal
and/or
interest, or other credit events, in respect of the protected
loans and debt securities, exceeds a specified threshold amount
or level of first loss.
Typically, the credit risk associated with a designated
portfolio of loans or debt securities has been tranched into
different layers of risk, which are then analyzed and rated by
the credit rating agencies. At origination, there is usually an
equity layer covering the first credit losses in respect of the
portfolio up to a specified percentage of the total portfolio,
and then successive layers ranging generally from a BBB-rated
layer to one or more AAA-rated layers. A significant majority of
transactions that are rated by rating agencies have risk layers
or tranches that were rated AAA at origination and are
immediately junior to the threshold level above which
AIGFPs payment obligation would generally arise. In
transactions that were not rated, AIGFP applied equivalent risk
criteria for setting the threshold level for its payment
obligations. Therefore, the risk layer assumed by AIGFP with
respect to the designated portfolio of loans or debt securities
in these transactions is often called the super
senior risk layer, defined as a layer of credit risk
senior to one or more risk layers that have been rated AAA by
the credit rating agencies, or if the transaction is not rated,
structured to the equivalent thereto.
132 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
The following graphic represents a typical structure of a
transaction including the super senior risk layer:
Regulatory
Capital Portfolio
A total of $234.4 billion (consisting of corporate loans
and prime residential mortgages) in net notional exposure of
AIGFPs super senior credit default swap portfolio as of
December 31, 2008 represented derivatives written for
financial institutions, principally in Europe, for the purpose
of providing regulatory capital relief rather than for arbitrage
purposes. These transactions were entered into by Banque AIG,
AIGFPs French regulated bank subsidiary, and written on
diversified pools of residential mortgages and corporate loans
(made to both large corporations and small to medium sized
enterprises). In exchange for a periodic fee, the counterparties
receive credit protection with respect to diversified loan
portfolios they own, thus reducing their minimum capital
requirements.
The regulatory benefit of these transactions for AIGFPs
financial institution counterparties is generally derived from
the terms of the Capital Accord of the Basel Committee on
Banking Supervision (Basel I) that existed through the end
of 2007 and which is in the process of being replaced by the
Revised Framework for the International Convergence of Capital
Measurement and Capital Standards issued by the Basel Committee
on Banking Supervision (Basel II). Prior to the adoption of
Basel II, a financial institution was required to hold capital
against its assets, based on the categorization of the issuer or
guarantor of the assets. One of the means for a financial
institution to reduce its required regulatory capital was to
purchase credit protection on a group of its assets from a
regulated financial institution, such as Banque AIG, in order to
benefit from such regulated financial institutions lower
risk weighting (e.g., 20 percent vs. 100 percent) that
is assigned to those assets under Basel I. A lower risk
weighting reduces the amount of capital a financial institution
is required to hold against such assets.
Unlike Basel I, Basel II gives credit to the relative
risk of loss associated with the assets, meaning that less
capital is required for such assets. After a financial
institution has implemented a capital model that is compliant
with Basel II and has obtained approval from its local
regulator, the CDS transactions provide no additional regulatory
benefit in most cases, except during a transition period. The
Basel II implementation includes a transition period during
which the financial institutions must calculate their capital
requirements under both Basel I and Basel II (until
December 31, 2009). During this period, the capital
required is floored at a percentage of the Basel I
capital calculation; therefore, until early 2010, these CDS
transactions may still provide regulatory capital benefit for
AIGFPs counterparties, depending on each
counterpartys particular circumstances. In addition, in a
limited number of instances, counterparties may decide to hold
these CDSs for a longer period of time because they provide a
regulatory capital benefit, while smaller, under Basel II.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 133
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Given the prospect of Basel II, the CDS transactions were
structured with early termination rights for counterparties
following a regulatory event such as the implementation of Basel
II. The pace at which the CDS transactions were and will be
terminated early varies among the counterparties based on a
number of factors including their progress in having the
internal capital models approved by their national regulator,
the effect of the transitional floor on overall total capital
charges, the counterparties capital needs and their
sensitivity to Basel I capital measures. AIG expects that the
counterparties in the remaining CDS transactions will terminate
the vast majority of transactions with AIGFP during this
transition period within the next 15 months.
When a counterparty elects to terminate a transaction early
pursuant to the terms of the contracts, the early termination is
at no cost to AIGFP. The counterparty may be required to pay the
remaining balance of an
agreed-upon
minimum fee to AIGFP. Typically, the minimum guaranteed fee on
recent transactions is equal to the fees due to AIGFP through
the first call date (which is the first date on which a
counterparty can terminate the transaction at no cost). During
2008, $99.7 billion in net notional amount was terminated
or matured. Through February 18, 2009, AIGFP has also received
formal termination notices for an additional $26.5 billion
in net notional amount with effective termination dates in 2009.
The regulatory capital relief CDS transactions require cash
settlement and, other than collateral posting, AIGFP is required
to make a payment in connection with a regulatory capital relief
transaction only if realized credit losses in respect of the
underlying portfolio exceed AIGFPs attachment point (see
Triggers and Settlement Alternatives below).
The super senior tranches of these CDS transactions continue to
be supported by high levels of subordination, which, in most
instances, have increased since origination. The weighted
average subordination supporting the European residential
mortgage and corporate loan referenced portfolios at
December 31, 2008 was 12.7 percent and
18.3 percent, respectively. Delinquencies, defaults and
realized losses for both types of referenced portfolios have
been modest to date. Substantially all of the underlying assets
are not rated by one of the principal rating agencies. The
highest level of realized losses to date in any single
residential mortgage and corporate loan pool was
2.1 percent and 0.42 percent, respectively. The
European residential mortgage portfolios are each comprised of
thousands of seasoned, prime, full documentation, mostly first
lien, owner-occupied mortgages originated largely at bank retail
branches at modest loan-to-value (LTV) ratios, except for one
$1.6 billion high LTV CDS transaction, which benefits from
both subordination and a significant percentage of pool mortgage
insurance. The corporate loan transactions are each comprised of
several hundred secured and unsecured loans diversified by
industry and, in some instances, by country, and have tight
per-issuer concentration limits. Both types of transactions
generally allow some substitution and replenishment of loans,
subject to tightly defined constraints, as older loans mature or
are prepaid. These replenishment rights usually mature within
the first few years of the trade, after which the proceeds of
any prepaid or maturing loans are applied first to the super
senior tranche (sequentially), thereby increasing the relative
level of subordination supporting the balance of AIGFPs
super senior CDS exposure.
134 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
The following graph presents subordination level from highest
to lowest and realized losses as a percent of gross notional
amount for each regulatory capital relief super senior CDS
transaction written on a diversified portfolio of corporate
loans as of December 31, 2008:
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 135
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
The following graph presents subordination level from highest
to lowest and realized losses as a percent of notional amount
for each regulatory capital relief super senior CDS transaction
written on a diversified portfolio of residential mortgages as
of December 31, 2008:
Given the current performance of the underlying portfolios, the
level of subordination and the expectation that counterparties
will terminate these transactions prior to their maturity; AIG
Financial Products Corp. does not expect that it will be
required to make payments pursuant to the contractual terms of
these transactions.
Arbitrage
Portfolio
A total of $63.1 billion in net notional exposure on AIG
Financial Products Corp.s super senior credit default
swaps as of December 31, 2008 are arbitrage-motivated
transactions written on multi-sector CDOs or designated pools of
investment grade senior unsecured corporate debt or CLOs. While
certain credit default swaps written on corporate debt and
multi-sector CDOs provide for cash settlement, $2.8 billion
in net notional amount of CDS transactions written on
multi-sector CDOs and all the CDS transactions written on CLOs
($1.5 billion net notional) require physical settlement
(see Triggers and Settlement Alternatives below). The ML
III transaction eliminated the vast majority of the super
senior multi-sector CDO credit default swap exposure.
ML III
Transaction
On November 25, 2008, AIG entered into a Master Investment
and Credit Agreement with the NY Fed, ML III, and The Bank of
New York Mellon which established arrangements for the purchase
by ML III of the multi-sector CDOs referenced in certain CDS
transactions between AIG Financial Products Corp. and its
counterparties. Concurrently, AIG Financial Products
Corp.s counterparties to such CDS transactions agreed to
terminate the CDS transactions relating to the multi-sector CDOs
purchased by ML III.
During 2008, AIG Financial Products Corp. terminated
multi-sector CDO transactions with a net notional amount of
$62.1 billion with its counterparties, and concurrently, ML
III purchased the underlying multi-sector CDOs including
$8.5 billion of multi-sector CDOs underlying
2a-7 Puts
written by AIG Financial Products Corp. The CDS transactions
terminated in connection with ML III contained physical
settlement provisions and were denominated in U.S. dollars.
The net payment made by ML III to the counterparties for
the purchase of the multi-sector CDOs was $26.8 billion,
which was funded by AIGs equity interest in ML III in the
amount of $5 billion and
136 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
$24.3 billion of borrowings under a senior loan from the NY
Fed to ML III. A portion of the net payment made by ML III to
the counterparties for the purchase of the multi-sector CDOs
facilitated the resolution of $8.0 billion of liquidity
arrangements, which had funded certain of the multi-sector CDOs
in connection with the
2a-7 Puts.
In connection with the ML III transaction, AIG Financial
Products Corp. entered into a Shortfall Agreement, dated
November 25, 2008 and amended on December 18, 2008
(the Shortfall Agreement), with ML III under which ML III made a
payment of $2.5 billion to AIG Financial Products Corp.
representing the amount by which collateral surrendered as part
of the termination of the CDS exceeded the fair value of the CDS
as of October 31, 2008.
Among the multi-sector CDOs purchased by ML III are certain CDO
securities with a net notional amount of $1.7 billion for
which the related
2a-7 Puts to
AIG Financial Products Corp. remained outstanding as of
December 31, 2008. For the $252 million notional
amount of multi-sector CDOs held by ML III with
2a-7 Puts
that may be exercised in 2009, ML III has agreed to not sell the
multi-sector CDOs in 2009 and to either not exercise its put
option on such multi-sector CDOs or to simultaneously exercise
their par put option with a par purchase of the multi-sector CDO
securities. In exchange, AIG Financial Products Corp. has agreed
to pay to ML III the consideration that it receives for
providing the put protection. AIG Financial Products Corp. and
ML III are currently negotiating an agreement that will outline
procedures to be taken by ML III and AIG Financial Products
Corp. for multi-sector CDOs with put options that may be
exercised after December 31, 2009, with the objective of
mitigating or eliminating the impact on AIG Financial
Products Corp. of such
2a-7 Puts
and capturing the associated economics for ML III.
In connection with the termination of $62.1 billion net
notional amount of CDS transactions in respect of the
ML III transaction, AIG Financial Products Corp. paid
$32.5 billion, net of $2.5 billion received in
connection with the shortfall agreement, through the surrender
of collateral previously posted. Included in this amount is
$2.5 billion related to multi-sector CDOs underlying
2a-7 Puts
previously written by AIG Financial Products Corp. and sold to
ML III. As a result of the termination of such CDS, AIG
Financial Products Corp. is no longer subject to any further
collateral calls related to such CDS transactions nor subject to
the risk of having to make a payment to a counterparty to
physically settle the CDS transactions following the occurrence
of a credit event, thereby alleviating the demand on
AIGFPs liquidity.
Multi-Sector
CDOs
The gross transaction notional amount of the multi-sector
CDOs on which AIGFP wrote protection on the super senior
tranche, subordination below the super senior risk layer, net
notional amount and fair value of derivative liability by
underlying collateral type were as follows (excluding
2a-7
Puts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Subordination
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
Below the
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Super Senior
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
of Derivative
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
Amount(a)
|
|
|
Risk Layer
|
|
|
Amount(b)
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
High grade with sub-prime collateral
|
|
$
|
6,776
|
|
|
$
|
2,808
|
|
|
$
|
3,968
|
|
|
$
|
1,797
|
|
High grade with no sub-prime collateral
|
|
|
10,156
|
|
|
|
5,816
|
|
|
|
4,340
|
|
|
|
1,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total high grade(c)
|
|
|
16,932
|
|
|
|
8,624
|
|
|
|
8,308
|
|
|
|
3,225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mezzanine with sub-prime
|
|
|
6,407
|
|
|
|
2,955
|
|
|
|
3,452
|
|
|
|
2,156
|
|
Mezzanine with no sub-prime
|
|
|
1,697
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
|
|
796
|
|
|
|
525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mezzanine(d)
|
|
|
8,104
|
|
|
|
3,856
|
|
|
|
4,248
|
|
|
|
2,681
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
25,036
|
|
|
$
|
12,480
|
|
|
$
|
12,556
|
|
|
$
|
5,906
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Total outstanding principal amount of securities held by a
CDO. |
|
(b) |
|
Net notional size on which AIGFP wrote credit protection. |
|
(c) |
|
High grade refers to transactions in which the
underlying collateral credit ratings on a stand-alone basis were
predominantly AA or higher at origination. |
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 137
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
(d) |
|
Mezzanine refers to transactions in which the
underlying collateral credit ratings on a stand-alone basis were
predominantly A or lower at origination. |
The net notional amounts of the multi-sector CDOs on which
AIGFP wrote protection on the super senior tranche, by
settlement alternative, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
CDS transactions with cash settlement provisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US dollar denominated
|
|
$
|
7,947
|
|
|
$
|
10,544
|
|
Euro denominated
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
|
|
2,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CDS transactions with cash settlement provisions
|
|
|
9,727
|
|
|
|
12,619
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDS transactions with physical settlement provisions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US dollar denominated
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
63,040
|
|
Euro denominated
|
|
|
2,063
|
|
|
|
2,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CDS transactions with physical settlement provisions
|
|
|
2,829
|
|
|
|
65,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
12,556
|
|
|
$
|
78,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents, for each multi-sector CDO that
is a reference obligation in a CDS written by AIGFP, the gross
and net notional amounts at December 31, 2008, attachment
points at inception and at December 31, 2008 and percentage
of gross notional amount rated less than B-/B3 at
December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage of Gross
|
|
|
|
Gross Notional
|
|
|
Net Notional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount Rated
|
|
|
|
Amount at
|
|
|
Amount at
|
|
|
Attachment Point
|
|
|
Attachment Point
|
|
|
Less than B-/B3 at
|
|
CDO
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
at Inception*
|
|
|
at December 31, 2008*
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1
|
|
$
|
1,680
|
|
|
$
|
1,440
|
|
|
|
12.00
|
%
|
|
|
14.28
|
%
|
|
|
15.88
|
%
|
2
|
|
|
665
|
|
|
|
396
|
|
|
|
27.00
|
%
|
|
|
40.45
|
%
|
|
|
20.20
|
%
|
3
|
|
|
1,064
|
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
20.00
|
%
|
|
|
23.49
|
%
|
|
|
18.96
|
%
|
4
|
|
|
1,328
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
40.00
|
%
|
|
|
60.02
|
%
|
|
|
42.68
|
%
|
5
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
36.00
|
%
|
|
|
48.55
|
%
|
|
|
42.37
|
%
|
6
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
53.00
|
%
|
|
|
53.19
|
%
|
|
|
2.86
|
%
|
7
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
|
53.00
|
%
|
|
|
53.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
8
|
|
|
1,412
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
76.00
|
%
|
|
|
74.50
|
%
|
|
|
39.33
|
%
|
9
|
|
|
1,130
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
10.83
|
%
|
|
|
11.29
|
%
|
|
|
6.89
|
%
|
10
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
|
39.33
|
%
|
|
|
45.30
|
%
|
|
|
65.11
|
%
|
11
|
|
|
1,268
|
|
|
|
1,103
|
|
|
|
12.27
|
%
|
|
|
10.24
|
%
|
|
|
5.04
|
%
|
12
|
|
|
1,348
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
|
25.24
|
%
|
|
|
27.86
|
%
|
|
|
6.54
|
%
|
13
|
|
|
1,490
|
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
|
|
10.00
|
%
|
|
|
9.42
|
%
|
|
|
8.76
|
%
|
14
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
33.00
|
%
|
|
|
47.48
|
%
|
|
|
54.63
|
%
|
15
|
|
|
623
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
33.25
|
%
|
|
|
37.36
|
%
|
|
|
60.94
|
%
|
16
|
|
|
2,570
|
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
|
|
16.50
|
%
|
|
|
17.84
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
17
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
|
|
32.00
|
%
|
|
|
44.08
|
%
|
|
|
43.08
|
%
|
18
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
|
529
|
|
|
|
24.49
|
%
|
|
|
22.46
|
%
|
|
|
68.89
|
%
|
19
|
|
|
779
|
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
32.90
|
%
|
|
|
39.75
|
%
|
|
|
81.03
|
%
|
20
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
|
34.51
|
%
|
|
|
43.09
|
%
|
|
|
78.07
|
%
|
21
|
|
|
4,970
|
|
|
|
496
|
|
|
|
9.72
|
%
|
|
|
10.31
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
25,036
|
|
|
$
|
12,556
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Expressed as a percentage of gross notional amount. |
138 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
In a number of instances, the level of subordination with
respect to individual CDOs has increased since inception
relative to the overall size of the CDO. While the super senior
tranches are amortizing, subordinate layers have not been
reduced by realized losses to date. Such losses are expected to
emerge in the future. At inception, substantially all of the
underlying assets were rated B-/B3 or higher and in most cases
at least BBB. Thus, the percentage of gross notional amount
rated less than B-/B3 represents deterioration in the credit
quality of the underlying assets.
The gross transaction notional amount, percentage of the
total CDO collateral pools, and ratings and vintage breakdown of
collateral securities in the multi-sector CDOs at
December 31, 2008, by ABS category, were as follows
(excluding
2a-7
Puts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transaction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Ratings
|
|
|
Vintage
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
|
AA
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
BB
|
|
|
<BB
|
|
|
NR
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2004+P
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMBS PRIME
|
|
$
|
3,013
|
|
|
|
12.79
|
%
|
|
|
10.50
|
%
|
|
|
0.95
|
%
|
|
|
0.57
|
%
|
|
|
0.26
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.51
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.31
|
%
|
|
|
7.39
|
%
|
|
|
3.72
|
%
|
|
|
0.59
|
%
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMBS ALT-A
|
|
|
3,526
|
|
|
|
14.96
|
%
|
|
|
8.91
|
%
|
|
|
0.99
|
%
|
|
|
0.78
|
%
|
|
|
1.68
|
%
|
|
|
0.55
|
%
|
|
|
2.05
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.68
|
%
|
|
|
3.91
|
%
|
|
|
5.33
|
%
|
|
|
4.29
|
%
|
|
|
0.75
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMBS
SUBPRIME
|
|
|
6,865
|
|
|
|
29.12
|
%
|
|
|
0.93
|
%
|
|
|
3.74
|
%
|
|
|
2.29
|
%
|
|
|
2.55
|
%
|
|
|
2.38
|
%
|
|
|
17.23
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.33
|
%
|
|
|
1.94
|
%
|
|
|
17.30
|
%
|
|
|
8.55
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CMBS
|
|
|
4,457
|
|
|
|
17.47
|
%
|
|
|
2.93
|
%
|
|
|
2.33
|
%
|
|
|
2.74
|
%
|
|
|
6.72
|
%
|
|
|
2.24
|
%
|
|
|
0.42
|
%
|
|
|
0.09
|
%
|
|
|
0.07
|
%
|
|
|
0.96
|
%
|
|
|
5.26
|
%
|
|
|
4.85
|
%
|
|
|
6.33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CDO
|
|
|
3,151
|
|
|
|
12.42
|
%
|
|
|
1.54
|
%
|
|
|
1.74
|
%
|
|
|
1.58
|
%
|
|
|
1.24
|
%
|
|
|
0.83
|
%
|
|
|
5.35
|
%
|
|
|
0.14
|
%
|
|
|
0.00
|
%
|
|
|
0.61
|
%
|
|
|
1.45
|
%
|
|
|
3.31
|
%
|
|
|
7.05
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER
|
|
|
4,024
|
|
|
|
13.24
|
%
|
|
|
3.70
|
%
|
|
|
3.01
|
%
|
|
|
4.18
|
%
|
|
|
1.75
|
%
|
|
|
0.04
|
%
|
|
|
0.36
|
%
|
|
|
0.20
|
%
|
|
|
0.32
|
%
|
|
|
0.58
|
%
|
|
|
2.85
|
%
|
|
|
4.43
|
%
|
|
|
5.06
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
25,036
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
%
|
|
|
28.51
|
%
|
|
|
12.76
|
%
|
|
|
12.14
|
%
|
|
|
14.20
|
%
|
|
|
6.04
|
%
|
|
|
25.92
|
%
|
|
|
0.43
|
%
|
|
|
1.38
|
%
|
|
|
14.78
|
%
|
|
|
20.55
|
%
|
|
|
34.77
|
%
|
|
|
28.52
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The corporate arbitrage portfolio consists principally of CDS
written on portfolios of senior unsecured corporate obligations
that were generally rated investment grade at the inception of
the CDS. These CDS transactions require cash settlement (see
Triggers and Settlement Alternatives below). This portfolio also
includes CDS with a net notional amount of $1.5 billion
written on the senior part of the capital structure of CLOs,
which require physical settlement.
The gross transaction notional amount of CDS transactions
written on portfolios of senior unsecured corporate obligations
(excluding CLOs), percentage of the total referenced portfolios,
and ratings by industry sector, in addition to the
subordinations below the super senior risk layer and
AIGFPs net notional exposure at December 31, 2008, by
industry sector, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Transaction
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Ratings
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
|
Aa
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
Baa
|
|
|
Ba
|
|
|
<Ba
|
|
|
NR
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States Industrial
|
|
$
|
23,363
|
|
|
|
37.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
19.2
|
%
|
|
|
4.7
|
%
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Financial
|
|
|
9,776
|
|
|
|
15.7
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
Utilities
|
|
|
2,218
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
1,364
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total United States
|
|
|
36,721
|
|
|
|
59.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
15.6
|
%
|
|
|
26.6
|
%
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
|
3.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-United
States Industrial
|
|
|
18,616
|
|
|
|
29.9
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.9
|
%
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
|
|
14.4
|
%
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
Financial
|
|
|
3,088
|
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.7
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Government
|
|
|
1,853
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.4
|
%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Utilities
|
|
|
1,680
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
1.5
|
%
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
Other
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 139
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Transaction
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Ratings
|
|
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
|
Aa
|
|
|
A
|
|
|
Baa
|
|
|
Ba
|
|
|
<Ba
|
|
|
NR
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Non-United
States
|
|
|
25,505
|
|
|
|
41.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
15.1
|
%
|
|
|
17.1
|
%
|
|
|
2.5
|
%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
62,226
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
30.7
|
%
|
|
|
43.7
|
%
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
6.8
|
%
|
|
|
6.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subordination
|
|
$
|
13,242
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Notional Amount
|
|
$
|
48,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Derivative Liability
|
|
$
|
2,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Triggers
and Settlement Alternatives
At December 31, 2008, all outstanding CDS transactions for
regulatory capital purposes and the majority of the arbitrage
portfolio (comprising $56.7 billion or 90 percent of
the net notional amount for the arbitrage portfolio at
December 31, 2008) have cash-settled structures in
respect of a basket of reference obligations, where AIGFPs
payment obligations may be triggered by payment shortfalls,
bankruptcy and certain other events such as write-downs of the
value of underlying assets (see Cash Settlement below). For the
remainder of the CDS transactions in respect of the arbitrage
portfolio (comprising $6.4 billion or 10 percent of
the net notional amount for the arbitrage portfolio at
December 31, 2008), AIGFPs payment obligations are
triggered by the occurrence of a credit event under a single
reference security, and performance is limited to a single
payment by AIGFP in return for physical delivery by the
counterparty of the reference security (see Physical Settlement
below). By contrast, at December 31, 2007, under the large
majority of CDS transactions in respect of multi-sector CDOs
(comprising $65.6 billion or 44.1 percent of the net
notional amount for the arbitrage portfolio at December 31,
2007) AIGFPs payment obligations were triggered by
the occurrence of a non-payment event under a single reference
CDO security, and performance was limited to a single payment by
AIGFP in return for physical delivery by the counterparty of the
reference security.
Cash Settlement. Transactions requiring cash
settlement (principally on a pay as you go basis)
are generally in respect of baskets of reference credits (which
may also include single-name CDS in addition to securities and
loans) rather than a single reference obligation as in the case
of the physically settled transactions described below. Under
these credit default swap transactions:
|
|
|
|
|
Each time a triggering event occurs a loss
amount is calculated. A triggering event is generally a
failure by the relevant obligor to pay principal of or, in some
cases, interest on one of the reference credits in the
underlying basket. Triggering events may also include bankruptcy
of the obligors of the reference credits, write-downs or payment
postponements with respect to interest or to the principal
amount of a reference credit payable at maturity. The
determination of the loss amount is specific to each triggering
event. It can represent the amount of a shortfall in ordinary
course interest payments on the reference credit, a write-down
in the interest on or principal of such reference credit or
payment postponed. It can also represent the difference between
the notional or par amount of such reference credit and its
market value, as determined by reference to market quotations. A
write-down with respect to a referenced credit may
arise as a result of a reduction in the outstanding principal
amount of such referenced credit (other than as a result of a
scheduled or unscheduled payment of principal), whether caused
by a principal deficiency, realized loss or forgiveness of
principal. An implied write-down may also result from the
existence of a shortfall between the referenced credits
pool principal balance and the aggregate balance of all pari
passu obligations and senior securities backed by the same
pool.
|
|
|
|
Triggering events can occur multiple times, either as a result
of continuing shortfalls in interest or write-downs or payment
postponements on a single reference credit, or as a result of
triggering events in respect of different reference credits
included in a protected basket. In connection with each
triggering event, AIGFP is required to make a cash payment to
the buyer of protection under the related CDS only if the
aggregate loss amounts calculated in respect of such triggering
event and all prior triggering events exceed a specified
threshold amount (reflecting AIGFPs attachment point).
|
140 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
If there are reimbursements received (actual or deemed) by the
CDS buyer in respect of prior triggering events, AIGFP will be
entitled to receive equivalent amounts from the counterparty to
the extent AIGFP has previously made a related payment.
|
Physical Settlement. For CDS transactions
requiring physical settlement, AIGFP is generally required to
pay unpaid principal and accrued interest for the relevant
reference obligation in return for physical delivery of such
reference obligation by the CDS buyer upon the occurrence of a
credit event. After purchasing the reference obligation, AIGFP
may sell the security and recover all or a portion of the
purchase price paid under the CDS, or hold such security and be
entitled to receive subsequent collections of principal and
interest. AIGFP generally is required to settle such a
transaction only if the following conditions are satisfied:
|
|
|
|
|
A Credit Event (as defined in the relevant CDS
transaction confirmation) must have occurred. In all CDS
transactions subject to physical settlement, Failure to
Pay is specified as a Credit Event and is generally
triggered if there is a failure by the issuer under the related
CDO to make a payment under the reference obligation (after the
expiration of any applicable grace period and, in certain
transactions, subject to a nominal non-payment threshold having
been met).
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition, certain of the AIGFP CDS (with an aggregate net
notional amount totaling $265 million and $8.3 billion
at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively) provide credit
protection in respect of CDOs that require minimum amounts of
collateral to be maintained to support the CDO debt, where the
notional amount of such collateral, subject to certain
adjustments, is affected by among other things the ratings of
the securities and other obligations comprising such collateral.
In the event that the issuer of such a CDO fails to maintain the
minimum levels of collateral, an event of default would occur,
triggering a right by a specified controlling class of CDO note
holders to accelerate the payment of principal and interest on
the protected reference obligations. Under certain of the CDSs,
upon acceleration of the reference obligations underlying a CDS,
AIGFP may be required to purchase such reference obligations for
a purchase price equal to unpaid principal of and accrued
interest on the CDO in settlement of the CDS. As a result of
this over-collateralization feature of these CDOs, AIGFP
potentially may be required to purchase such CDO securities in
settlement of the related CDS sooner than would be required if
such CDOs did not have an over-collateralization feature. One of
these CDOs was accelerated in 2008, and AIGFP extinguished its
CDS obligations by purchasing the protected CDO security for
$162 million, which equaled the principal amount
outstanding related to this CDS, of which $103 million was
recorded in the trading securities portfolio and
$59 million was recorded in the available for sale
portfolio. AIGFP had no CDS net notional exposure with respect
to CDOs that have experienced over-collateralization events of
default at February 18, 2009.
|
|
|
|
In addition to subordination, cash flow diversion mechanics may
provide further protection from losses for holders of the super
senior CDO securities. Following the acceleration of a CDO
security, all, or a portion of, available cash flows in a CDO
could be diverted from the junior tranches to the most senior
tranches. In a CDO with such a feature, the junior tranches may
not receive any cash flows until all interest on, and principal
of, the super senior tranches are paid in full. Thus, potential
losses borne by the holders of the super senior CDO securities
may be mitigated as cash flows that would otherwise be payable
to junior tranches throughout the entire CDO capital structure
are instead diverted directly to the most senior tranches. Cash
flow diversion mechanics also may arise in the context of
over-collateralization tests. Upon a failure by the CDO issuer
to comply with certain over-collateralization tests (other than
those that trigger an indenture event of default), cash flows
that would otherwise be payable to certain junior tranches
throughout the CDO capital structure may instead be diverted to
more senior tranches. Consequently, the super senior risk layer
is paid down at a faster rate, effectively increasing the
relative level of subordination.
|
|
|
|
The existence of a tranche of securities ranking pari passu
with the super senior CDO securities does not provide
additional subordination that protects holders of the super
senior CDO securities, as holders of such pari passu
securities are entitled to receive payments from available
cash flows at the same level of priority as holders of the super
senior securities. Thus, a pari passu tranche of
securities does not affect the amount of losses that have to be
absorbed by classes of CDO securities other than the super
senior CDO
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 141
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
securities before the super senior securities incur a loss,
although the pari passu tranche will absorb losses on a
pro rata basis after subordinate classes of securities are
exhausted.
|
|
|
|
|
The CDS buyer must deliver the reference obligation within a
specified period, generally within 30 days. There is no
payment obligation if delivery is not made within this period.
|
|
|
|
Upon completion of the physical delivery and payment by AIGFP,
AIGFP would be the holder of the relevant reference obligation
and have all rights associated with a holder of such securities.
|
2a-7
Puts: Included in the multi-sector CDO portfolio are
maturity-shortening puts that allow the holders of the
securities issued by certain CDOs to treat the securities as
short-term eligible
2a-7
investments under the Investment Company Act of 1940
(2a-7 Puts).
Holders of securities are required, in certain circumstances, to
tender their securities to the issuer at par. If an
issuers remarketing agent is unable to resell the
securities so tendered, AIGFP must purchase the securities at
par as long as the security has not experienced a payment
default or certain bankruptcy events with respect to the issuer
of such security have not occurred.
At December 31, 2007,
2a-7 Puts
with a net notional amount of $6.5 billion were outstanding
and included as part of the multi-sector CDO portfolio. During
2008, AIGFP issued new
2a-7 Puts
with a net notional amount of $5.4 billion on the super
senior security issued by a CDO of AAA-rated CMBS pursuant to a
facility that was entered into in 2005. AIGFP is not a party to
any commitments to issue any additional
2a-7 Puts.
During 2008, AIGFP repurchased multi-sector CDO securities with
a principal amount of $9.4 billion in connection with these
obligations, of which $8.0 billion was funded using
existing liquidity arrangements. In connection with the ML III
transaction, ML III purchased $8.5 billion of multi-sector
CDOs underlying
2a-7 Puts
written by AIGFP. A portion of the net payment made by ML III to
the counterparties for the purchase of the multi-sector CDOs
facilitated the resolution of liquidity arrangements, which had
funded certain of the multi-sector CDOs in connection with the
2a-7 Puts.
Among the multi-sector CDOs purchased by ML III are certain CDO
securities with a net notional amount of $1.7 billion for
which the related
2a-7 Puts to
AIGFP remained outstanding as of December 31, 2008. For the
$252 million net notional amount of multi-sector CDOs held
by ML III with
2a-7 Puts
that may be exercised in 2009, ML III has agreed to not sell the
multi-sector CDOs in 2009 and to either not exercise its put
option on such multi-sector CDOs or to simultaneously exercise
their par put option with a par purchase of the multi-sector CDO
securities. In exchange, AIG Financial Products Corp. has agreed
to pay to ML III the consideration that it received for
providing the put protection. AIG Financial Products Corp. and
ML III are currently negotiating an agreement that will outline
procedures to be taken by ML III and AIG Financial Products
Corp. for multi-sector CDOs with put options that may be
exercised after December 31, 2009, with the objective of
mitigating or eliminating the impact on AIG Financial Products
Corp. of such
2a-7 Puts
and capturing the associated economics for ML III. At
December 31, 2008,
2a-7 Puts
with a net notional amount of $1.7 billion were outstanding.
Termination Events. Certain of the super
senior credit default swaps provide the counterparties with an
additional termination right if AIGs rating level falls to
BBB or Baa2. At that level, counterparties to the CDS
transactions with the following net notional amounts at
December 31, 2008, by portfolio, have the right to
terminate the transactions early:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Notional Amount
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Multi-sector CDO
|
|
$
|
5,501
|
|
Corporate arbitrage
|
|
|
27,908
|
|
Regulatory capital
|
|
|
5,205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
38,614
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If counterparties exercise this right, the contracts provide for
the counterparties to be compensated for the cost to replace the
transactions, or an amount reasonably determined in good faith
to estimate the losses the counterparties would incur as a
result of the termination of the transactions.
Given the level of uncertainty in estimating both the number of
counterparties who may elect to exercise their right to
terminate and the payment that may be triggered in connection
with any such exercise, AIG is unable to
142 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
reasonably estimate the aggregate amount that it would be
required to pay under the super senior credit default swaps in
the event of any further downgrade.
Certain super senior credit default swaps written for regulatory
capital relief, with a net notional amount of
$161.5 billion at December 31, 2008, include triggers
that require certain actions to be taken by AIG once AIGs
rating level falls to certain levels, which, if not taken, give
rise to a right of the counterparties to terminate the CDS. Such
actions include posting collateral, transferring the swap or
providing a guarantee from a more highly rated entity. In light
of the rating actions taken in respect of AIG on
September 15, 2008, AIGFP has implemented collateral
arrangements in a large majority of these transactions. In the
event of a termination of the contract that is caused by
AIGs rating downgrade, AIGFP is obligated to compensate
the counterparty based on its loss. As a result of
AIGFP posting collateral, AIG eliminated the
counterparties right to terminate under this downgrade
provision, thereby avoiding the uncertainty of determining the
loss from an early termination of a regulatory
capital CDS.
Collateral
Most of AIGFPs credit default swaps are subject to
collateral posting provisions. These provisions differ among
counterparties and asset classes. Although AIGFP has collateral
posting obligations associated with both regulatory capital
relief transactions and arbitrage transactions, the large
majority of these obligations to date have been associated with
arbitrage transactions in respect of multi-sector CDOs.
The collateral arrangements in respect of the multi-sector CDO,
regulatory capital and corporate arbitrage transactions are
nearly all documented under a Credit Support Annex (CSA) to an
ISDA Master Agreement (Master Agreement). The Master Agreement
and CSA forms are standardized form agreements published by the
ISDA, which market participants have adopted as the primary
contractual framework for various kinds of derivatives
transactions, including CDS. The Master Agreement and CSA forms
are designed to be customized by counterparties to accommodate
their particular requirements for the anticipated types of swap
transactions to be entered into. Elective provisions and
modifications of the standard terms are negotiated in connection
with the execution of these documents. The Master Agreement and
CSA permit any provision contained in these documents to be
further varied or overridden by the individual transaction
confirmations, providing flexibility to tailor provisions to
accommodate the requirements of any particular transaction. A
CSA, if agreed by the parties to a Master Agreement, supplements
and forms part of the Master Agreement and contains provisions
(among others) for the valuation of the covered transactions,
the delivery and release of collateral, the types of acceptable
collateral, the grant of a security interest (in the case of a
CSA governed by New York law) or the outright transfer of title
(in the case of a CSA governed by English law) in the collateral
that is posted, the calculation of the amount of collateral
required, the valuation of the collateral provided, the timing
of any collateral demand or return, dispute mechanisms, and
various other rights, remedies and duties of the parties with
respect to the collateral provided.
In general, each party has the right under a CSA to act as the
Valuation Agent and initiate the calculation of the
exposure of one party to the other (Exposure) in respect of
transactions covered by the CSA. The valuation calculation may
be performed daily, weekly or at some other interval, and the
frequency is one of the terms negotiated at the time the CSA is
signed. The definition of Exposure under a standard CSA is the
amount that would be payable to one party by the other party
upon a hypothetical termination of that transaction. This amount
is determined, in most cases, by the Valuation Agent using its
estimate of mid-market quotations (i.e., the average of
hypothetical bid and ask quotations) of the amounts that would
be paid for a replacement transaction. AIGFP determines Exposure
typically by reference to the mark-to-market valuation of the
relevant transaction produced by its systems and specialized
models. Exposure amounts are typically determined for all
transactions under a Master Agreement (unless the parties have
specifically agreed to exclude certain transactions, not to
apply the CSA or to set a specific transaction Exposure to
zero). The aggregate Exposure less the value of collateral
already held by the relevant party (and following application of
certain thresholds) results in a net exposure amount (Delivery
Amount). If this amount is a positive number, then the other
party must deliver collateral with a value equal to the Delivery
Amount. Under the standard CSA, the party not acting as
Valuation Agent for any particular Exposure calculation may
dispute the Valuation Agents calculation of the Delivery
Amount. If the parties are unable to resolve this dispute, the
terms of the standard CSA provide that the Valuation Agent is
required to recalculate Exposure using, in substitution for the
disputed Exposure amounts, the average of actual quotations at
mid-market from four leading dealers in the relevant market.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 143
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
After an Exposure amount is determined for a transaction subject
to a CSA, it is combined with the Exposure amounts for all other
transactions under the relevant Master Agreement, which may be
netted against one another where the counterparties to a Master
Agreement are each exposed to one another in respect of
different transactions. Actual collateral postings with respect
to a Master Agreement may be affected by other agreed CSA terms,
including threshold and independent amounts, that may increase
or decrease the amount of collateral posted.
Regulatory
Capital Relief Transactions
As of December 31, 2008, 68.0 percent of AIGFPs
regulatory capital relief transactions (measured by net notional
amount) were subject to a CSA. In other transactions, which
represent 1.0 percent of the total net notional amount of
the outstanding regulatory capital relief transactions, AIGFP is
obligated to put a CSA or alternative collateral arrangement in
place if AIGs ratings fall below certain levels
(typically, A-/A3). At December 31, 2008, 31.0 percent
of the regulatory capital relief portfolio is not subject to
collateral posting provisions. In general, each regulatory
capital relief transaction is subject to a stand-alone Master
Agreement or similar agreement, under which the aggregate
Exposure is calculated with reference to only a single
transaction.
The underlying mechanism that determines the amount of
collateral to be posted varies from one counterparty to another,
and there is no standard formula. The varied mechanisms resulted
from varied negotiations with different counterparties. The
following is a brief description of the primary mechanisms that
are currently being employed to determine the amount of
collateral posting for this portfolio.
Reference to Market Indices Under this
mechanism, the amount of collateral to be posted is determined
based on a formula that references certain tranches of a market
index, such as either Itraxx or CDX. This mechanism is used for
CDS transactions that reference either corporate loans, or
residential mortgages. While the market index is not a direct
proxy, it has the advantage of being readily obtainable.
Market Value of Reference Obligation Under
this mechanism the amount of collateral to be posted is
determined based on the difference between the net notional
amount of a referenced RMBS security and the securitys
market value.
Expected Loss Models Under this mechanism,
the amount of collateral to be posted is determined based on the
amount of expected credit losses, generally determined using a
rating-agency model.
Negotiated Amount Under this mechanism, the
amount of collateral to be posted is determined based on bespoke
terms negotiated between AIGFP and the counterparty, which could
be a fixed percentage of the notional amount or present value of
premiums to be earned by AIGFP.
The amount of collateral postings by underlying mechanism as
described above with respect to the regulatory capital relief
portfolio (prior to consideration of transactions other than
AIGFPs super senior credit default swap portfolio subject
to the same Master Agreements) were as follows (there were no
collateral postings on this portfolio prior to March 31,
2008):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2008
|
|
|
June 30, 2008
|
|
|
September 30, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
February 18, 2009
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Reference to market indices
|
|
$
|
212
|
|
|
$
|
177
|
|
|
$
|
157
|
|
|
$
|
667
|
|
|
$
|
417
|
|
Market value of reference obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
286
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
Expected loss models
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Negotiated amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
213
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
212
|
|
|
$
|
319
|
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
|
$
|
1,287
|
|
|
$
|
952
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arbitrage
Portfolio Multi-Sector CDOs
In the large majority of the CDS transactions in respect of
multi-sector CDOs, the standard CSA provisions for the
calculation of Exposure have been modified, with the Exposure
amount determined pursuant to an agreed
144 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
formula that is based on the difference between the net notional
amount of such transaction and the market value of the relevant
underlying CDO security, rather than the replacement value of
the transaction. As of any date, the market value of
the relevant CDO security is the price at which a marketplace
participant would be willing to purchase such CDO security in a
market transaction on such date, while the replacement
value of the transaction is the cost on such date of
entering into a credit default swap transaction with
substantially the same terms on the same referenced obligation
(e.g., the CDO security). In cases where a formula is utilized,
a transaction-specific threshold is generally factored into the
calculation of Exposure, which reduces the amount of collateral
required to be posted. These thresholds typically vary based on
the credit ratings of AIG
and/or the
reference obligations, with greater posting obligations arising
in the context of lower ratings. For the large majority of
counterparties to these transactions, the Master Agreement and
CSA cover non-CDS transactions (e.g., interest rate and cross
currency swap transactions) as well as CDS transactions. As a
result, the amount of collateral to be posted by AIGFP in
relation to the CDS transactions will be added to or offset by
the amount, if any, of the Exposure AIG has to the counterparty
on the non-CDS transactions.
Arbitrage
Portfolio Corporate Debt/CLOs
Almost all of AIGFPs corporate arbitrage transactions are
subject to CSAs. 97.6 percent (measured by net notional
amount) of these transactions contain no special collateral
posting provisions, but are subject to a Master Agreement that
includes a CSA. These transactions are treated the same as other
transactions subject to the same Master Agreement and CSA, with
the calculation of collateral in accordance with the standard
CSA procedures outlined above. 17.5 percent (measured by
net notional amount) of these transactions, although subject to
a Master Agreement and CSA, have specific valuation and
threshold provisions. These thresholds are typically based on a
combination of the credit rating of AIG and a ratings model of
the transaction developed by Moodys model rating of the
transaction (and not based on the value of any underlying
reference obligations). Thus, as long as AIG maintains a rating
above a specified threshold and the Moodys model of the
underlying transaction exceeds a specified rating, the
collateral provisions do not apply.
Collateral
Calls
AIGFP has received collateral calls from counterparties in
respect of certain super senior credit default swaps, of which a
large majority relate to multi-sector CDOs. To a lesser extent,
AIGFP has also received collateral calls in respect of certain
super senior credit default swaps entered into by counterparties
for regulatory capital relief purposes and in respect of
corporate arbitrage.
Frequently, valuation estimates made by counterparties with
respect to certain super senior credit default swaps or the
underlying reference CDO securities, for purposes of determining
the amount of collateral required to be posted by AIGFP in
connection with such instruments, have differed, at times
significantly, from AIGFPs estimates. In almost all cases,
AIGFP has been able to successfully resolve the differences or
otherwise reach an accommodation with respect to collateral
posting levels, including in certain cases by entering into
compromise collateral arrangements. Due to the ongoing nature of
these collateral calls, AIGFP may engage in discussions with one
or more counterparties in respect of these differences at any
time. Valuation estimates made by counterparties for collateral
purposes are, like any other third-party valuation, considered
in the determination of the fair value estimates of AIGFPs
super senior credit default swap portfolio.
Through June 30, 2007, AIGFP had not received any
collateral calls related to this super senior credit default
swap portfolio. Since that date and through February 18,
2009, counterparties have made large collateral calls against
AIGFP, in particular related to the multi-sector CDO portfolio.
This was largely driven by deterioration in the market value of
the reference obligations and the effects of the downgrade of
AIGs ratings.
The amount of collateral postings with respect to
AIGFPs super senior credit default swap portfolio (prior
to offsets for other transactions) were as follows:
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 145
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Regulatory capital
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
212
|
|
|
$
|
319
|
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
|
$
|
1,287
|
|
Arbitrage multi-sector CDO
|
|
|
2,718
|
|
|
|
7,590
|
|
|
|
13,241
|
|
|
|
31,469
|
|
|
|
5,129
|
|
Arbitrage corporate
|
|
|
161
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
259
|
|
|
|
902
|
|
|
|
2,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,879
|
|
|
$
|
8,170
|
|
|
$
|
13,819
|
|
|
$
|
32,814
|
|
|
$
|
8,765
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amount of future collateral posting requirements is a
function of AIGs credit ratings, the rating of the
reference obligations and any further decline in the market
value of the relevant reference obligations, with the latter
being the most significant factor. While a high level of
correlation exists between the amount of collateral posted and
the valuation of these contracts in respect of the arbitrage
portfolio, a similar relationship does not exist with respect to
the regulatory capital portfolio given the nature of how the
amount of collateral for these transactions is determined. Given
the severe market disruption, lack of observable data and the
uncertainty regarding the potential effects on market prices of
measures recently undertaken by the federal government to
address the credit market disruption, AIGFP is unable to
reasonably estimate the amounts of collateral that it would be
required to post.
Models
and Modeling
AIGFP values its credit default swaps written on the super
senior risk layers of designated pools of debt securities or
loans using internal valuation models, third-party price
estimates and market indices. The principal market was
determined to be the market in which super senior credit default
swaps of this type and size would be transacted, or have been
transacted, with the greatest volume or level of activity. AIG
has determined that the principal market participants,
therefore, would consist of other large financial institutions
who participate in sophisticated over-the-counter derivatives
markets. The specific valuation methodologies vary based on the
nature of the referenced obligations and availability of market
prices.
The valuation of the super senior credit derivatives continues
to be challenging given the limitation on the availability of
market observable information due to the lack of trading and
price transparency in the structured finance market,
particularly during and since the second half of 2007. These
market conditions have increased the reliance on management
estimates and judgments in arriving at an estimate of fair value
for financial reporting purposes. Further, disparities in the
valuation methodologies employed by market participants and the
varying judgments reached by such participants when assessing
volatile markets have increased the likelihood that the various
parties to these instruments may arrive at significantly
different estimates as to their fair values.
AIGFPs valuation methodologies for the super senior credit
default swap portfolio have evolved in response to the
deteriorating market conditions and the lack of sufficient
market observable information. AIG has sought to calibrate the
model to available market information and to review the
assumptions of the model on a regular basis.
Arbitrage
Portfolio Multi-Sector CDOs
The underlying assumption of the valuation methodology for
AIGFPs credit default swap portfolio wrapping multi-sector
CDOs is that, to be willing to assume the obligations under a
credit default swap, a market participant would require payment
of the full difference between the cash price of the underlying
tranches of the referenced securities portfolio and the net
notional amount specified in the credit default swap.
AIGFP uses a modified version of the Binomial Expansion
Technique (BET) model to value its credit default swap portfolio
written on super senior tranches of CDOs of ABS, including the
2a-7 Puts.
The BET model was developed in 1996 by a major rating agency to
generate expected loss estimates for CDO tranches and derive a
credit rating for those tranches, and has been widely used ever
since.
AIG selected the BET model for the following reasons:
|
|
|
|
|
it is known and utilized by other institutions;
|
|
|
|
it has been studied extensively, documented and enhanced over
many years;
|
146 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
it is transparent and relatively simple to apply;
|
|
|
|
the parameters required to run the BET model are generally
observable; and
|
|
|
|
it can easily be modified to use probabilities of default and
expected losses derived from the underlying collateral
securities market prices instead of using rating-based
historical probabilities of default.
|
The BET model has certain limitations. A well known limitation
of the BET model is that it can understate the expected losses
for super senior tranches when default correlations are high.
The model uses correlations implied from diversity scores which
do not capture the tendency for correlations to increase as
defaults increase. Recognizing this concern, AIG tested the
sensitivity of the valuations to the diversity scores. The
results of the testing demonstrated that the valuations are not
very sensitive to the diversity scores because the expected
losses generated from the prices of the collateral pool
securities are currently high, breaching the attachment point in
most transactions. Once the attachment point is breached by a
sufficient amount, the diversity scores, and their implied
correlations, are no longer a significant driver of the
valuation of a super senior tranche.
AIGFP has adapted the BET model to estimate the price of the
super senior risk layer or tranche of the CDO. AIG modified the
BET model to imply default probabilities from market prices for
the underlying securities and not from rating agency
assumptions. To generate the estimate, the model uses the price
estimates for the securities comprising the portfolio of a CDO
as an input and converts those price estimates to credit spreads
over current LIBOR-based interest rates. These credit spreads
are used to determine implied probabilities of default and
expected losses on the underlying securities. These data are
then aggregated and used to estimate the expected cash flows of
the super senior tranche of the CDO.
The application of the modified BET model involves the following
steps for each individual super senior tranche of a CDO in the
portfolio:
|
|
|
|
1)
|
Calculation of the cash flow pattern that matches the weighted
average life for each underlying security of the CDO;
|
|
|
2)
|
Calculation of an implied credit spread for each security from
the price and cash flow pattern determined in step 1. This is an
arithmetic process which converts prices to yields (similar to
the conversion of United States Department of the Treasury
security prices to yields), and then subtracts LIBOR-based
interest rates to determine the credit spreads;
|
|
|
3)
|
Conversion of the credit spread into its implied probability of
default. This also is an arithmetic process that determines the
assumed level of default on the security that would equate the
present value of the expected cash flows discounted at a
risk-free rate with the present value of the contractual cash
flows discounted using LIBOR-based interest rates plus the
credit spreads;
|
|
|
4)
|
Generation of expected losses for each underlying security using
the probability of default and recovery rate;
|
|
|
5)
|
Aggregation of the cash flows for all securities to create a
cash flow profile of the entire collateral pool within the CDO;
|
|
|
6)
|
Division of the collateral pool into a number of hypothetical
independent identical securities based on the CDOs
diversity score so that the cash flow effects of the portfolio
can be mathematically aggregated properly. The purpose of
dividing the collateral pool into hypothetical securities is a
simplifying assumption used in all BET models as part of a
statistical technique that aggregates large amounts of
homogeneous data;
|
|
|
7)
|
Simulation of the default behavior of the hypothetical
securities using a Monte Carlo simulation and aggregation of the
results to derive the effect of the expected losses on the cash
flow pattern of the super senior tranche taking into account the
cash flow diversion mechanism of the CDO;
|
|
|
8)
|
Discounting of the expected cash flows determined in step 7
using LIBOR-based interest rates to estimate the value of the
super senior tranche of the CDO; and
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 147
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
9)
|
Adjustment of the model value for the super senior multi-sector
CDO credit default swap for the effect of the risk of
non-performance by AIG using the credit spreads of AIG available
in the marketplace and considering the effects of collateral and
master netting arrangements.
|
AIGFP employs a Monte Carlo simulation in step 7 above to assist
in quantifying the effect on the valuation of the CDO of the
unique aspects of the CDOs structure such as triggers that
divert cash flows to the most senior part of the capital
structure. The Monte Carlo simulation is used to determine
whether an underlying security defaults in a given simulation
scenario and, if it does, the securitys implied random
default time and expected loss. This information is used to
project cash flow streams and to determine the expected losses
of the portfolio.
In addition to calculating an estimate of the fair value of the
super senior CDO security referenced in the credit default swaps
using its internal model, AIGFP also considers the price
estimates for the super senior CDO securities provided by third
parties, including counterparties to these transactions, to
validate the results of the model and to determine the best
available estimate of fair value. In determining the fair value
of the super senior CDO security referenced in the credit
default swaps, AIGFP uses a consistent process which considers
all available pricing data points and eliminates the use of
outlying data points. When pricing data points are within a
reasonable range an averaging technique is applied.
The following table presents the net notional amount and fair
value of derivative liability of the multi-sector super senior
credit default swap portfolio using AIGFPs fair value
methodology:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
Net Notional Amount
|
|
|
Fair Value Derivative Liability
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
BET model
|
|
$
|
2,545
|
|
|
$
|
42,173
|
|
|
$
|
1,370
|
|
|
$
|
5,432
|
|
Third-party price
|
|
|
2,951
|
|
|
|
8,038
|
|
|
|
1,753
|
|
|
|
1,947
|
|
Average of BET model and third-party price
|
|
|
3,218
|
|
|
|
21,152
|
|
|
|
1,568
|
|
|
|
2,975
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
761
|
|
European RMBS
|
|
|
3,842
|
|
|
|
4,622
|
|
|
|
1,215
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
12,556
|
|
|
$
|
78,205
|
|
|
$
|
5,906
|
|
|
$
|
11,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The fair value of derivative liability of $5.9 billion
recorded on AIGFPs super senior multi-sector CDO credit
default swap portfolio represents the cumulative change in fair
value of the remaining derivatives, which represents AIGs
best estimate of the amount it would need to pay to a willing,
able and knowledgeable third-party to assume the obligations
under AIGFPs super senior multi-sector credit default swap
portfolio at December 31, 2008.
Arbitrage
Portfolio Corporate Debt/CLOs
The valuation of credit default swaps written on portfolios of
investment-grade corporate debt and CLOs is less complex than
the valuation of super senior multi-sector CDO credit default
swaps and the valuation inputs are more transparent and readily
available.
In the case of credit default swaps written on portfolios of
investment-grade corporate debt, AIGFP estimates the fair value
of its obligations by comparing the contractual premium of each
contract to the current market levels of the senior tranches of
comparable credit indices, the iTraxx index for European
corporate issuances and the CDX index for U.S. corporate
issuances. These indices are considered reasonable proxies for
the referenced portfolios. In addition, AIGFP compares these
valuations to third-party prices and makes adjustments as
necessary to determine the best available estimate of fair value.
AIGFP estimates the fair value of its obligations resulting from
credit default swaps written on CLOs to be equivalent to the par
value less the current market value of the referenced
obligation. Accordingly, the value is determined by obtaining
third-party quotes on the underlying super senior tranches
referenced under the credit default swap contract.
No assurance can be given that the fair value of AIGFPs
arbitrage credit default swap portfolio would not change
materially if other market indices or pricing sources were used
to estimate the fair value of the portfolio.
148 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Regulatory
Capital Portfolio
In the case of credit default swaps written to facilitate
regulatory capital relief, AIGFP estimates the fair value of
these derivatives by considering observable market transactions.
The transactions with the most observability are the early
terminations of these transactions by counterparties. AIG
expects that the majority of these transactions will be
terminated within the next 15 months by AIGFPs
counterparties. During 2008, $99.7 billion in net notional
amount of regulatory capital super senior transactions was
terminated or matured. AIGFP has also received formal
termination notices for an additional $26.5 billion in net
notional amount of regulatory capital super senior CDS
transactions with effective termination dates in 2009. AIGFP has
not been required to make any payments as part of these
terminations and in certain cases was paid a fee upon
termination. AIGFP also considers other market data, to the
extent relevant and available.
AIGFP does not expect to make any payment under these contracts
based on current portfolio conditions and stress analyses
performed. Over the contractual life of the transactions, AIGFP
is owed contractual premiums over an extended period. However,
the expectation that the counterparties will be willing and able
to terminate these transactions in the very near term based on
the contract provisions and market conditions significantly
reduces the expected future cash flows to be received.
Consequently, the future expected cash flows validate the
observable market transactions used to price the portfolio.
In light of early termination experience to date and after other
analyses, AIG determined that there was no unrealized market
valuation adjustment for this regulatory capital relief
portfolio for the year ended December 31, 2008 other than
for one transaction where AIGFP believes the counterparty is no
longer using the transaction to obtain regulatory capital
relief. During 2008, a regulatory capital relief transaction
with a net notional amount of $1.6 billion and a fair value
loss of $379 million at December 31, 2008 was not
terminated as expected when it no longer provided regulatory
capital benefit to the counterparty. This transaction provides
protection on European RMBS, unlike the other regulatory
transactions, which provide protection on loan portfolios held
by the counterparties. The documentation for this transaction
contains provisions not included in AIGFPs other
regulatory capital relief transactions, which enable the
counterparty to arbitrage a specific credit exposure.
AIG will continue to assess the valuation of this portfolio and
monitor developments in the marketplace. Given the significant
deterioration in the credit markets and the risk that
AIGFPs expectations with respect to the termination of
these transactions by its counterparties may not materialize,
there can be no assurance that AIG will not recognize unrealized
market valuation losses from this portfolio in future periods,
and given its size, recognition of even a small percentage
decline in the fair value of this portfolio could be material to
AIGs consolidated results of operations for an individual
reporting period or to AIGs consolidated financial
condition.
Key
Assumptions Used in the BET model Multi-Sector
CDOs
The most significant assumption used in the BET model is the
estimated price of the individual securities within the CDO
collateral pools. The following table summarizes the gross
transaction notional weighted average price by ABS category.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Transaction Notional
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Average Price at December 31,
|
|
ABS Category
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
RMBS Prime
|
|
|
50.46
|
%
|
|
|
84.32
|
%
|
RMBS Alt-A*
|
|
|
31.68
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
RMBS Subprime
|
|
|
29.02
|
|
|
|
65.34
|
|
CMBS
|
|
|
54.50
|
|
|
|
92.96
|
|
CDOs
|
|
|
17.53
|
|
|
|
47.82
|
|
Other
|
|
|
50.92
|
|
|
|
92.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
36.65
|
%
|
|
|
73.29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
RMBS Alt-A category was included in RMBS Prime in 2007. |
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 149
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
The decrease in the weighted average prices reflects continued
deterioration in the markets for RMBS and CMBS and further
downgrades in RMBS and CMBS credit ratings.
Prices for the individual securities held by a CDO are obtained
in most cases from the CDO collateral managers, to the extent
available. For the year ended December 31, 2008, CDO
collateral managers provided market prices for 61.2 percent
of the underlying securities. When a price for an individual
security is not provided by a CDO collateral manager, AIGFP
derives the price through a pricing matrix using prices from CDO
collateral managers for similar securities. Matrix pricing is a
mathematical technique used principally to value debt securities
without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific
securities, but rather by relying on the relationship of the
security to other benchmark-quoted securities. Substantially all
of the CDO collateral managers who provided prices used dealer
prices for all or part of the underlying securities, in some
cases supplemented by third-party pricing services.
The BET model also uses diversity scores, weighted average
lives, recovery rates and discount rates. The determination of
some of these inputs requires the use of judgment and estimates,
particularly in the absence of market-observable data. Diversity
scores (which reflect default correlations between the
underlying securities of a CDO) are obtained from CDO trustees
or implied from default correlations. Weighted average lives of
the underlying securities are obtained, when available, from
external subscription services such as Bloomberg and Intex and,
if not available, AIGFP utilizes an estimate reflecting known
weighted average lives.
Collateral recovery rates are obtained from the multi-sector CDO
recovery data of a major rating agency. AIGFP utilizes a
LIBOR-based interest rate curve to derive its discount rates.
AIGFP employs similar control processes to validate these model
inputs as those used to value AIGs investment portfolio as
described in Critical Accounting Estimates Fair
Value Measurements of Certain Financial Assets and
Liabilities Overview. The effects of the adjustments
resulting from the validation process were de minimis for each
period presented.
Valuation
Sensitivity Arbitrage Portfolio
Multi-Sector
CDOs
AIG utilizes sensitivity analyses that estimate the effects of
using alternative pricing and other key inputs on AIGs
calculation of the unrealized market valuation loss related to
the AIGFP super senior credit default swap portfolio. While AIG
believes that the ranges used in these analyses are reasonable,
given the current difficult market conditions, AIG is unable to
predict which of the scenarios is most likely to occur. As
recent experience demonstrates, actual results in any period are
likely to vary, perhaps materially, from the modeled scenarios,
and there can be no assurance that the unrealized market
valuation loss related to the AIGFP super senior credit default
swap portfolio will be consistent with any of the sensitivity
analyses. On average for any quarterly period during the past
year, prices for CDOs declined between 6.14 percent and
11.93 percent of the notional amount outstanding. Further,
it is difficult to extrapolate future experience based on
current dislocated market conditions.
For the purposes of estimating sensitivities for the super
senior multi-sector CDO credit default swap portfolio, the
change in valuation derived using the BET model is used to
estimate the change in the fair value of the derivative
liability. Out of the total $12.6 billion net notional
amount of CDS written on multi-sector CDOs outstanding at
December 31, 2008, a BET value is available for
$8.8 billion net notional amount. No BET value is
determined for $3.8 billion of CDS written on European
multi-sector CDOs as prices on the underlying securities held by
the CDOs are not provided by collateral managers; instead these
CDS are valued using counterparty prices. Therefore,
sensitivities disclosed below apply only to the net notional
amount of $8.8 billion.
As mentioned above, the most significant assumption used in the
BET model is the estimated price of the securities within the
CDO collateral pools. If the actual price of the securities
within the collateral pools differs from the price used in
estimating the fair value of the super senior credit default
swap portfolio, there is potential for material variation in the
fair value estimate. Any further declines in the value of the
underlying collateral securities held by a CDO will similarly
affect the value of the super senior CDO securities given their
significantly depressed valuations. Given the current difficult
market conditions, AIG cannot predict reasonably likely changes
in the prices of the underlying collateral securities held
within a CDO at this time.
150 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
The following table presents key inputs used in the BET
model, and the potential increase (decrease) to the fair value
of the derivative liability by ABS category at December 31,
2008 corresponding to changes in these key inputs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) to Fair Value of Derivative Liability
|
|
|
|
Inputs Used at
|
|
|
|
Entire
|
|
|
RMBS
|
|
|
RMBS
|
|
|
RMBS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
Change
|
|
Portfolio
|
|
|
PRIME
|
|
|
ALT-A
|
|
|
Subprime
|
|
|
CMBS
|
|
|
CDOs
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Bond prices
|
|
33 points
|
|
Increase of 5 points
|
|
$
|
(745
|
)
|
|
$
|
(38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(73
|
)
|
|
$
|
(336
|
)
|
|
$
|
(178
|
)
|
|
$
|
(81
|
)
|
|
$
|
(39
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease of 5 points
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average life
|
|
5.01 years
|
|
Increase of 1 year
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease of 1 year
|
|
|
(284
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(268
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recovery rates
|
|
21%
|
|
Increase of 10%
|
|
|
(71
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease of 10%
|
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversity score(a)
|
|
16
|
|
Increase of 5
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease of 5
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount curve(b)
|
|
N/A
|
|
Increase of 100bps
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The diversity score is an input at the CDO level. A
calculation of sensitivity to this input by type of security is
not possible. |
|
(b) |
|
The discount curve is an input at the CDO level. A
calculation of sensitivity to this input by type of security is
not possible. Furthermore, for this input it is not possible to
disclose a weighted average input as a discount curve consists
of a series of data points. |
These results are calculated by stressing a particular
assumption independently of changes in any other assumption. No
assurance can be given that the actual levels of the key inputs
will not exceed, perhaps significantly, the ranges assumed by
AIG for purposes of the above analysis. No assumption should be
made that results calculated from the use of other changes in
these key inputs can be interpolated or extrapolated from the
results set forth above.
Corporate
Debt
The following table represents the relevant market credit
indices and CDS maturity used to estimate the sensitivity for
the credit default swap portfolio written on investment-grade
corporate debt and the estimated increase (decrease) to fair
value of derivative liability at December 31, 2008
corresponding to changes in these market credit indices and
maturity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease) To
|
|
Input Used at December 31, 2008
|
|
Fair Value Derivative Liability
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
CDS maturity (in years)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
CDX Index spread (in basis points)
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
Effect of an increase of 10 basis points
|
|
$
|
(20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
Effect of a decrease of 10 basis points
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
iTraxx Index spread (in basis points)
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
65
|
|
Effect of an increase of 10 basis points
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(33
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
Effect of a decrease of 10 basis points
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These results are calculated by stressing a particular
assumption independently of changes in any other assumption. No
assurance can be given that the actual levels of the indices and
maturity will not exceed, perhaps significantly, the ranges
assumed by AIGFP for purposes of the above analysis. No
assumption should be made that results calculated from the use
of other changes in these indices and maturity can be
interpolated or extrapolated from the results set forth above.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 151
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Other derivatives. Valuation models that
incorporate unobservable inputs initially are calibrated to the
transaction price. Subsequent valuations are based on observable
inputs to the valuation model (e.g., interest rates, credit
spreads, volatilities, etc.). Model inputs are changed only when
corroborated by market data.
Transfers
into Level 3
During the year ended December 31, 2008, AIG transferred
from Level 2 to Level 3 approximately
$1.7 billion of assets, primarily representing fixed
maturity securities for which the significant inputs used to
measure the fair value of the securities became unobservable
primarily as a result of the significant disruption in the
credit markets. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements for additional information about transfers into
Level 3.
Capital
Resources and Liquidity
For a discussion of AIGs liquidity see
Overview Liquidity.
Shareholders
Equity
The changes in AIGs consolidated shareholders
equity were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Beginning of year
|
|
$
|
95,801
|
|
|
$
|
101,677
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(99,289
|
)
|
|
|
6,200
|
|
Unrealized depreciation of investments, net of tax
|
|
|
(8,722
|
)
|
|
|
(5,708
|
)
|
Cumulative translation adjustment, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,067
|
)
|
|
|
1,185
|
|
Dividends to shareholders
|
|
|
(1,105
|
)
|
|
|
(1,964
|
)
|
Payments advanced to purchase shares, net
|
|
|
912
|
|
|
|
(912
|
)
|
Common share issuance
|
|
|
7,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration received for preferred stock not yet
issued(a)
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Series D preferred stock
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of proceeds over par value of preferred stock issued
|
|
|
39,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of warrants
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share purchases
|
|
|
(1,912
|
)
|
|
|
(5,104
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,108
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other(b)
|
|
|
(1,143
|
)
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End of year
|
|
$
|
52,710
|
|
|
$
|
95,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
AIG expects to issue the Series C Preferred Stock in
early March 2009. |
|
(b) |
|
Reflects the effects of employee stock transactions and the
present value of future contract adjustment payments related to
the issuance of Equity Units. |
Share
Repurchases
In February 2007, AIGs Board of Directors increased
AIGs share repurchase program by authorizing the purchase
of shares with an aggregate purchase price of $8 billion.
In November 2007, AIGs Board of Directors authorized the
purchase of an additional $8 billion in common stock. In
2007, AIG entered into structured share repurchase arrangements
providing for the purchase of shares over time with an aggregate
purchase price of $7 billion.
A total of 37,926,059 shares were purchased during the
first six months of 2008 to meet commitments that existed at
December 31, 2007. There were no repurchases during the
third and fourth quarters of 2008.
152 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
At February 18, 2009, $9 billion was available for
purchases under the aggregate authorization. Pursuant to the Fed
Credit Agreement, however, AIG is restricted from repurchasing
shares of its common stock.
Share
Issuance
In May 2008, AIG sold 196,710,525 shares of its common
stock at a price per share of $38 in a public offering.
Concurrent with the common stock offering, AIG sold
78.4 million Equity Units at a price per unit of $75. The
Equity Units consist of an ownership interest in AIG junior
subordinated debentures and a stock purchase contract obligating
the holder of an equity unit to purchase, and obligating AIG to
sell, on each of February 15, 2011, May 1, 2011 and
August 1, 2011, for a price of $25, a variable number of
shares of AIG common stock, that is not less than
0.54823 shares and not more than 0.6579 shares,
subject to anti-dilution adjustments. Accordingly, a maximum
number of 154,738,080 shares and a minimum number of
128,944,480 shares of AIG common stock will be issued in
the year 2011 under the stock purchase contracts, subject to
anti-dilution adjustments.
On May 7, 2008, AIGs Board of Directors declared a
quarterly cash dividend on the common stock of $0.22 per share
that was paid on September 19, 2008 to shareholders of
record on September 5, 2008. Effective September 23,
2008, AIGs Board of Directors suspended the declaration of
dividends on AIGs common stock. Pursuant to the Fed Credit
Agreement, AIG is restricted from paying dividends on its common
stock.
See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Dividends
from Insurance Subsidiaries
Payments of dividends to AIG by its insurance subsidiaries are
subject to certain restrictions imposed by regulatory
authorities. With respect to AIGs domestic insurance
subsidiaries, the payment of any dividend requires formal notice
to the insurance department in which the particular insurance
subsidiary is domiciled. Under the laws of many states, an
insurer may pay a dividend without prior approval of the
insurance regulator when the amount of the dividend is below
certain regulatory thresholds. Other foreign jurisdictions,
notably Bermuda, Japan, Hong Kong, Taiwan, the U.K., Thailand
and Singapore, may restrict the ability of AIGs foreign
insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends. Largely as a result of
these restrictions, a significant majority of the aggregate
equity of AIGs consolidated subsidiaries was restricted
from immediate transfer to AIG parent at December 31, 2008.
See Regulation and Supervision herein. AIG cannot predict how
recent regulatory investigations may affect the ability of its
regulated subsidiaries to pay dividends. To AIGs
knowledge, no AIG company is currently on any regulatory or
similar watch list with regard to solvency. See also
Liquidity herein, Note 14 to the Consolidated Financial
Statements and Item 1A. Risk Factors Liquidity.
Regulation
and Supervision
AIGs insurance subsidiaries, in common with other
insurers, are subject to regulation and supervision by the
states and jurisdictions in which they do business. In the
United States, the NAIC has developed Risk-Based Capital (RBC)
requirements. RBC relates an individual insurance companys
statutory surplus to the risk inherent in its overall operations.
AIGs insurance subsidiaries file financial statements
prepared in accordance with statutory accounting practices
prescribed or permitted by domestic and foreign insurance
regulatory authorities. The principal differences between
statutory financial statements and financial statements prepared
in accordance with U.S. GAAP for domestic companies are
that statutory financial statements do not reflect DAC, some
bond portfolios may be carried at amortized cost, assets and
liabilities are presented net of reinsurance, policyholder
liabilities are valued using more conservative assumptions and
certain assets are non-admitted.
In connection with the filing of the 2005 statutory financial
statements for AIGs domestic General Insurance companies,
AIG agreed with the relevant state insurance regulators on the
statutory accounting treatment of various items. The regulatory
authorities have also permitted certain of the domestic and
foreign insurance subsidiaries to support the carrying value of
their investments in certain non-insurance and foreign insurance
subsidiaries by utilizing the AIG audited consolidated financial
statements to satisfy the requirement that the
U.S. GAAP-basis equity of such entities be audited. AIG has
received similar permitted practice authorizations from
insurance regulatory authorities in connection with the 2008 and
2007 statutory financial statements. The permitted practice
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 153
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
resulted in a benefit to the surplus of the domestic and foreign
General Insurance companies of $114 million and
$859 million, respectively, and did not affect compliance
with minimum regulatory capital requirements.
As discussed under Item 3. Legal Proceedings, various
regulators have commenced investigations into certain insurance
business practices. In addition, the OTS and other regulators
routinely conduct examinations of AIG and its subsidiaries,
including AIGs consumer finance operations. AIG cannot
predict the ultimate effect that these investigations and
examinations, or any additional regulation arising therefrom,
might have on its business. Federal, state or local legislation
may affect AIGs ability to operate and expand its various
financial services businesses, and changes in the current laws,
regulations or interpretations thereof may have a material
adverse effect on these businesses.
AIGs U.S. operations are negatively affected under
guarantee fund assessment laws which exist in most states. As a
result of operating in a state which has guarantee fund
assessment laws, a solvent insurance company may be assessed for
certain obligations arising from the insolvencies of other
insurance companies which operated in that state. AIG generally
records these assessments upon notice. Additionally, certain
states permit at least a portion of the assessed amount to be
used as a credit against a companys future premium tax
liabilities. Therefore, the ultimate net assessment cannot
reasonably be estimated. The guarantee fund assessments net of
credits recognized in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, were
$8 million, $87 million and $97 million.
AIG is also required to participate in various involuntary pools
(principally workers compensation business) which provide
insurance coverage for those not able to obtain such coverage in
the voluntary markets. This participation is also recorded upon
notification, as these amounts cannot reasonably be estimated.
A substantial portion of AIGs General Insurance business
and a majority of its Life Insurance & Retirement
Services business are conducted in foreign countries. The degree
of regulation and supervision in foreign jurisdictions varies.
Generally, AIG, as well as the underwriting companies operating
in such jurisdictions, must satisfy local regulatory
requirements. Licenses issued by foreign authorities to AIG
subsidiaries are subject to modification and revocation. Thus,
AIGs insurance subsidiaries could be prevented from
conducting future business in certain of the jurisdictions where
they currently operate. AIGs international operations
include operations in various developing nations. Both current
and future foreign operations could be adversely affected by
unfavorable political developments up to and including
nationalization of AIGs operations without compensation.
Adverse effects resulting from any one country may affect
AIGs results of operations, liquidity and financial
condition depending on the magnitude of the event and AIGs
net financial exposure at that time in that country.
Foreign insurance operations are individually subject to local
solvency margin requirements that require maintenance of
adequate capitalization, which AIG complies with by country. In
addition, certain foreign locations, notably Japan, have
established regulations that can result in guarantee fund
assessments. These have not had a material effect on AIGs
financial condition or results of operations.
Investments
Investments
by Segment
The following tables summarize the composition of AIGs
investments by segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Management
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds available for sale, at fair value
|
|
$
|
85,791
|
|
|
$
|
262,824
|
|
|
$
|
1,971
|
|
|
$
|
12,284
|
|
|
$
|
172
|
|
|
$
|
363,042
|
|
Bond trading securities, at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,296
|
|
|
|
26,848
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4,099
|
|
|
|
37,248
|
|
Securities lending invested collateral, at fair value
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,844
|
|
154 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Management
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stocks available for sale, at fair value
|
|
|
3,497
|
|
|
|
4,988
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
8,808
|
|
Common and preferred stocks trading, at fair value
|
|
|
285
|
|
|
|
11,312
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,335
|
|
Mortgage and other loans receivable, net of allowance
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
27,709
|
|
|
|
367
|
|
|
|
6,558
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
34,687
|
|
Finance receivables, net of allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
30,944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30,949
|
|
Flight equipment primarily under operating leases, net of
accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,395
|
|
Other invested assets
|
|
|
11,763
|
|
|
|
17,184
|
|
|
|
1,247
|
|
|
|
14,540
|
|
|
|
7,244
|
|
|
|
51,978
|
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell, at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
10,803
|
|
|
|
26,554
|
|
|
|
6,238
|
|
|
|
2,347
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
46,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments*
|
|
$
|
112,944
|
|
|
$
|
359,926
|
|
|
$
|
115,715
|
|
|
$
|
36,034
|
|
|
$
|
12,293
|
|
|
$
|
636,912
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds available for sale, at fair value
|
|
$
|
74,057
|
|
|
$
|
294,162
|
|
|
$
|
41,703
|
|
|
$
|
27,753
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
437,675
|
|
Bonds held to maturity, at amortized cost
|
|
|
21,355
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,581
|
|
Bond trading securities, at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,948
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,258
|
|
Securities lending invested collateral, at fair value
|
|
|
5,031
|
|
|
|
57,471
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
13,012
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,662
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stocks available for sale, at fair value
|
|
|
7,484
|
|
|
|
12,093
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
20,272
|
|
Common and preferred stocks trading, at fair value
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
21,026
|
|
|
|
3,921
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25,297
|
|
Mortgage and other loans receivable, net of allowance
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
24,851
|
|
|
|
1,365
|
|
|
|
7,442
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
33,727
|
|
Finance receivables, net of allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
31,229
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,234
|
|
Flight equipment primarily under operating leases, net of
accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,984
|
|
Other invested assets
|
|
|
12,467
|
|
|
|
19,031
|
|
|
|
3,663
|
|
|
|
17,327
|
|
|
|
6,989
|
|
|
|
59,477
|
|
Short-term investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell, at fair value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,950
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,950
|
|
Other short-term investments
|
|
|
7,356
|
|
|
|
25,236
|
|
|
|
12,249
|
|
|
|
4,919
|
|
|
|
1,591
|
|
|
|
51,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Investments*
|
|
$
|
128,084
|
|
|
$
|
463,824
|
|
|
$
|
157,498
|
|
|
$
|
71,350
|
|
|
$
|
8,712
|
|
|
$
|
829,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
At December 31, 2008, approximately 54 percent and 46
percent of investments were held by domestic and foreign
entities, respectively. At December 31, 2007, approximately
63 percent and 37 percent of investments were held by domestic
and foreign investments, respectively. |
Investment
Strategy
AIGs investment strategies are tailored to the specific
business needs of each operating unit. The investment objectives
are driven by the business model for each of the businesses:
General Insurance, Life Insurance, Retirement Services and Asset
Managements Spread-Based Investment business. The primary
objectives are liquidity, preservation of capital, growth of
surplus and generation of investment income to support the
insurance
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 155
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
products. Difficult market conditions in recent quarters have
significantly hindered AIGs ability to achieve these
objectives, and these challenges are expected to persist for the
foreseeable future.
At the local operating unit level, investment strategies are
based on considerations that include the local market, liability
duration and cash flow characteristics, rating agency and
regulatory capital considerations, legal investment limitations,
tax optimization and diversification.
The majority of assets backing insurance liabilities at AIG
consist of intermediate and long duration fixed maturity
securities. In the case of Life Insurance & Retirement
Services companies, as well as in the GIC and MIP portfolios of
the Asset Management segment, the fundamental investment
strategy is, as nearly as is practicable, to match the duration
characteristics of the liabilities with comparable duration
assets. Fixed maturity securities held by the insurance
companies included in the AIG Property Casualty Group
historically have consisted primarily of laddered holdings of
tax-exempt municipal bonds, which provided attractive after-tax
returns and limited credit risk. In light of AIGs net
operating position, AIG changed its intent to hold to maturity
certain tax-exempt municipal securities held by its insurance
subsidiaries. Fixed maturity securities held by Foreign General
Insurance companies consist primarily of intermediate duration
high grade securities.
The market price of fixed maturity securities reflects numerous
components, including interest rate environment, credit spread,
embedded optionality (such as call features), liquidity,
structural complexity, foreign exchange risk, and other credit
and non-credit factors. However, in most circumstances, pricing
is most sensitive to interest rates, such that the market price
declines as interest rates rise, and increases as interest rates
fall. This effect is more pronounced for longer duration
securities.
AIG marks to market the vast majority of the invested assets
held by its insurance companies pursuant to FAS 115,
Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity
Securities, and related accounting pronouncements.
However, with limited exceptions (primarily with respect to
separate account products consolidated on AIGs balance
sheet pursuant to
SOP 03-01),
AIG does not mark-to-market its insurance liabilities for
changes in interest rates, even though rising interest rates
have the effect of reducing the fair value of such liabilities,
and falling interest rates have the opposite effect. This
results in the recording of changes in unrealized gains (losses)
on securities in Accumulated other comprehensive income
resulting from changes in interest rates without any
correlative, inverse changes in gains (losses) on AIGs
liabilities. Because AIGs asset duration in certain
low-yield currencies, particularly Japan and Taiwan, is shorter
than its liability duration, AIG views increasing interest rates
in these countries as economically advantageous, notwithstanding
the effect that higher rates have on the market value of its
fixed maturity portfolio.
Discussion of investments by operating segment is as
follows:
General
Insurance
In AIGs General Insurance business, the duration of
liabilities for long-tail casualty lines is greater than other
lines. As differentiated from the Life Insurance &
Retirement Services companies, the focus is not on
asset-liability matching, but on preservation of capital and
growth of surplus.
Fixed income holdings of the AIG Property Casualty Group are
currently comprised primarily of tax-exempt securities, which
provide attractive risk-adjusted after-tax returns. These high
quality municipal investments have an average rating of AA.
Fixed income assets held in Foreign General Insurance are of
high quality and short to intermediate duration, averaging 2.5
years compared to 6.9 years for those in AIG Property Casualty
Group.
While invested assets backing reserves are invested in
conventional fixed income securities in AIG Property Casualty
Group, a modest portion of surplus is allocated to large
capitalization, high-dividend, public equity strategies and to
alternative investments, including private equity and hedge
funds. Notwithstanding the current environment, these
investments have provided a combination of added diversification
and attractive long-term returns over time.
156 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Life
Insurance & Retirement Services
With respect to Life Insurance & Retirement Services,
AIG uses asset-liability management as a tool worldwide in the
life insurance business to influence the composition of the
invested assets and appropriate marketing strategies. AIGs
objective is to maintain a matched asset-liability structure.
However, in certain markets, the absence of long-dated fixed
income investment instruments may preclude a matched
asset-liability position. In addition, AIG may occasionally
determine that it is economically advantageous to be temporarily
in an unmatched position. To the extent that AIG has maintained
a matched asset-liability structure, the economic effect of
interest rate fluctuations is partially mitigated.
AIGs investment strategy for the Life
Insurance & Retirement Services segment is to produce
cash flows greater than maturing insurance liabilities. AIG
actively manages the asset-liability relationship in its foreign
operations, even though certain territories lack qualified
long-term investments or certain local regulatory authorities
may impose investment restrictions. For example, in several
Southeast Asian countries, the duration of investments is
shorter than the effective maturity of the related policy
liabilities. Therefore, there is risk that the reinvestment of
the proceeds at the maturity of the initial investments may be
at a yield below that of the interest required for the accretion
of the policy liabilities. Additionally, there exists a future
investment risk associated with certain policies currently
in-force which will have premium receipts in the future. That
is, the investment of these future premium receipts may be at a
yield below that required to meet future policy liabilities.
AIG actively manages the interest rate assumptions and crediting
rates used for its new and in force business. Business
strategies continue to evolve to maintain profitability of the
overall business. In some countries, new products are being
introduced with minimal investment guarantees, resulting in a
shift toward investment-linked savings products and away from
traditional savings products with higher guarantees.
The investment of insurance cash flows and reinvestment of the
proceeds of matured securities and coupons requires active
management of investment yields while maintaining satisfactory
investment quality and liquidity.
AIG may use alternative investments, including equities, real
estate and foreign currency denominated fixed income instruments
in certain foreign jurisdictions where interest rates remain low
and there are limited long-dated bond markets to extend the
duration or increase the yield of the investment portfolio to
more closely match the requirements of the policyholder
liabilities and DAC recoverability. This strategy has been
effectively used in Japan and more recently by Nan Shan in
Taiwan. In Japan, foreign assets, excluding those matched to
foreign liabilities, were approximately 17 percent of
statutory assets, which is below the maximum allowable
percentage under current local regulation. Foreign assets
comprised approximately 27 percent of Nan Shans
invested assets at December 31, 2008, slightly below the
maximum allowable percentage under current local regulation. The
majority of Nan Shans in-force policy portfolio is
traditional life and endowment insurance products with implicit
interest rate guarantees. New business with lower interest rate
guarantees are gradually reducing the overall interest
requirements, but asset portfolio yields have declined faster
due to the prolonged low interest rate environment. As a result,
although the investment margins for a large block of in-force
policies are negative, the block remains profitable overall
because the mortality and expense margins presently exceed the
negative investment spread. In response to the low interest rate
environment and the volatile exchange rate of the Taiwanese
dollar, Nan Shan is emphasizing new products with lower implied
guarantees, including participating endowments and
investment-linked products.
AIG actively manages the asset-liability relationship in its
domestic operations. This relationship is more easily managed
through the availability of qualified long-term investments.
A number of guaranteed benefits, such as living benefits or
guaranteed minimum death benefits, are offered on certain
variable life and variable annuity products. AIG manages its
exposure resulting from these long-term guarantees through
reinsurance or capital market hedging instruments.
AIG invests in equities for various reasons, including
diversifying its overall exposure to interest rate risk.
Available for sale bonds and equity securities are subject to
declines in fair value. Such declines in fair value are
presented in unrealized appreciation or depreciation of
investments, net of taxes, as a component of Accumulated other
comprehensive income. Declines that are determined to be
other-than-temporary are reflected in income in the period in
which the determination is made. See Critical Accounting
Estimates Other-Than-Temporary Impairments herein.
Generally, insurance regulations restrict the types of assets in
which an insurance company may invest. When permitted by
regulatory authorities and when deemed necessary to protect
insurance assets, including
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 157
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
invested assets, from adverse movements in foreign currency
exchange rates, interest rates and equity prices, AIG and its
insurance subsidiaries may enter into derivative transactions as
end users to hedge their exposures. For a further discussion of
AIGs use of derivatives, see Risk Management
Credit Risk Management Derivatives Transactions
herein.
In certain jurisdictions, significant regulatory
and/or
foreign governmental barriers exist which may not permit the
immediate free flow of funds between insurance subsidiaries or
from the insurance subsidiaries to AIG parent. For a discussion
of these restrictions, see Item 1. Business
Regulation.
Financial
Services
Capital
Markets
AIGFPs management objective is to minimize interest rate,
currency, commodity and equity risks associated with its
investment securities. AIGFP hedges the market risk associated
with the investment securities on a portfolio basis effectively
converting the returns. While not qualifying for hedge
accounting treatment under FAS133, this transaction achieves the
economic result of limiting interest rate volatility arising
from such securities. The market risk associated with such
hedges is managed on a portfolio basis.
Securities purchased under agreements to resell are treated as
collateralized financing transactions. AIGFP takes possession of
or obtains a security interest in securities purchased under
agreements to resell.
For a discussion of the unwinding of AIGs businesses and
portfolios, see Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Outlook Financial Services.
AIGFP uses the proceeds from the issuance of notes and bonds and
GIAs to invest in a diversified portfolio of securities,
including securities available for sale, and derivative
transactions. The funds may also be invested in securities
purchased under agreements to resell. The proceeds from the
disposal of the aforementioned securities available for sale and
securities purchased under agreements to resell are used to fund
the maturing GIAs or other AIGFP financings, or to invest in new
assets. For a further discussion of AIGFPs borrowings, see
Capital Resources and Liquidity Borrowings herein.
Capital Markets derivative transactions are carried at fair
value. AIGFP reduces its market risk exposure through similarly
valued offsetting transactions including swaps, trading
securities, options, forwards and futures. For a further
discussion on the use of derivatives by Capital Markets, see
Operating Review Financial Services
Operations Capital Markets and Risk
Management Derivatives herein and Note 10 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements.
AIGFP owns inventories in certain commodities in which it
trades, and may reduce the exposure to market risk through the
use of swaps, forwards, futures, and option contracts. Physical
commodities are recorded at the lower of cost or fair value.
Trading securities, at fair value, and securities and spot
commodities sold but not yet purchased, at fair value, are
marked to fair value daily with the unrealized gain or loss
recognized in income. These trading securities are purchased and
sold as necessary to meet the risk management and business
objectives of Capital Markets operations.
Asset
Management
Asset Management invested assets include those supporting
AIGs Spread-Based Investment Business, proprietary
investments of AIG Global Real Estate and other proprietary
investments including investments originally acquired for
warehouse purposes.
The Spread-Based Investment business strategy is to generate
spread income from investments yielding returns greater than
AIGs cost of funds. The asset-liability relationship is
actively managed. The goal of the business is to capture a
spread between income earned on investments and the funding
costs of the program while mitigating interest rate and foreign
currency exchange rate risk. The invested assets are
predominantly fixed maturity securities and include
U.S. residential mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed
securities and commercial mortgage-backed securities. In
addition, the GIC program invests in various investment
partnerships such as
158 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
hedge, private equity and affordable housing funds. The MIP sold
credit protection by issuing predominantly single-name
investment grade corporate credit default swaps with the intent
to earn spread income on credit exposure in an unfunded and
leveraged form.
AIG Global Real Estate maintains a proprietary investment
portfolio of direct real estate investments and investments in
real estate based joint ventures and partnerships. AIG Global
Real Estate invests primarily in strategic and opportunistic
development projects domiciled in the U.S., Europe and Asia. AIG
Investments holds investments in various direct private equity
and private equity funds that were originally acquired as
warehouse investments targeted for future managed investment
products but which are now considered proprietary investments.
Available
for Sale and Held to Maturity Investments
The amortized cost or cost and fair value of AIGs
available for sale and held to maturity securities were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Cost or
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Available for sale(a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and government sponsored entities
|
|
$
|
4,433
|
|
|
$
|
331
|
|
|
$
|
(59
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,705
|
|
|
$
|
7,956
|
|
|
$
|
333
|
|
|
$
|
(37
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,252
|
|
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
|
|
62,718
|
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
(2,611
|
)
|
|
|
61,257
|
|
|
|
46,087
|
|
|
|
927
|
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
46,854
|
|
Non-U.S.
governments
|
|
|
62,176
|
|
|
|
6,560
|
|
|
|
(1,199
|
)
|
|
|
67,537
|
|
|
|
67,023
|
|
|
|
3,920
|
|
|
|
(743
|
)
|
|
|
70,200
|
|
Corporate debt
|
|
|
194,481
|
|
|
|
4,661
|
|
|
|
(13,523
|
)(b)
|
|
|
185,619
|
|
|
|
239,822
|
|
|
|
6,215
|
|
|
|
(4,518
|
)
|
|
|
241,519
|
|
Mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized
|
|
|
53,255
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
(6,933
|
)
|
|
|
47,326
|
|
|
|
140,982
|
|
|
|
1,221
|
|
|
|
(7,703
|
)
|
|
|
134,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total bonds
|
|
$
|
377,063
|
|
|
$
|
13,706
|
|
|
$
|
(24,325
|
)
|
|
$
|
366,444
|
|
|
$
|
501,870
|
|
|
$
|
12,616
|
|
|
$
|
(13,161
|
)
|
|
$
|
501,325
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
8,381
|
|
|
|
1,146
|
|
|
|
(719
|
)
|
|
|
8,808
|
|
|
|
15,188
|
|
|
|
5,547
|
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
20,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
385,444
|
|
|
$
|
14,852
|
|
|
$
|
(25,044
|
)
|
|
$
|
375,252
|
|
|
$
|
517,058
|
|
|
$
|
18,163
|
|
|
$
|
(13,624
|
)
|
|
$
|
521,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity(c):
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,581
|
|
|
$
|
609
|
|
|
$
|
(33
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
At December 31, 2007, included AIGFP available for sale
securities with a fair value of $39.3 billion, for which
AIGFP elected the fair value option effective January 1,
2008, consisting primarily of corporate debt, mortgage-backed,
asset-backed and CDO securities. At December 31, 2008, the
fair value of these securities was $26.1 billion. At
December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, fixed
maturities held by AIG that were below investment grade or not
rated totaled $19.4 billion and $27.0 billion,
respectively. During the third quarter of 2008, AIG changed its
intent to hold until maturity certain tax-exempt municipal
securities held by its insurance subsidiaries. As a result, all
securities previously classified as held to maturity are now
classified in the available for sale category. See Note 1
to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional
information. Fixed maturity securities reported on the balance
sheet include $442 million of short-term investments
included in Securities lending invested collateral. |
|
(b) |
|
Financial institutions represent approximately 57 percent of
the total gross unrealized losses at December 31, 2008. |
|
(c) |
|
Represents obligations of states, municipalities and
political subdivisions. In 2008, AIG changed its intent to hold
such securities to maturity. |
At December 31, 2008, approximately 54 percent of the
fixed maturity securities were in domestic entities.
Approximately 28 percent of such domestic securities were
rated AAA by one or more of the principal rating agencies.
Approximately eight percent were below investment grade or not
rated. AIGs investment decision process relies primarily
on internally generated fundamental analysis and internal risk
ratings. Third-party rating
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 159
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
services ratings and opinions provide one source of
independent perspectives for consideration in the internal
analysis.
A significant portion of the foreign fixed maturity portfolio is
rated by Moodys, S&P or similar foreign rating
services. Rating services are not available in all overseas
locations. AIGs Credit Risk Committee (CRC) closely
reviews the credit quality of the foreign portfolios
non-rated fixed maturity securities. At December 31, 2008,
approximately 14 percent of the foreign fixed income
investments were either rated AAA or, on the basis of AIGs
internal analysis, were equivalent from a credit standpoint to
securities so rated. Approximately five percent were below
investment grade or not rated at that date. Approximately one
third of the foreign fixed maturity portfolio is sovereign fixed
maturity securities supporting policy liabilities in the country
of issuance.
For additional disclosures on investments, see Note 5 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The credit ratings of AIGs fixed maturity investments
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
|
22
|
%
|
|
|
40
|
%
|
AA
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
A
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
Below investment grade
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Non-rated
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The industry categories of AIGs available for sale
corporate debt securities, other than those of AIGFP, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Financial institutions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money Center /Global Bank Groups
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
16
|
%
|
Regional banks other
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Life insurance
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Securities firms and other finance companies
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Insurance non-life
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Regional banks North America
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other financial institutions
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
Utilities
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Communications
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Consumer noncyclical
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Capital goods
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
Consumer cyclical
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Energy
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Other
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total*
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
At both December 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
approximately 96 percent of these investments were rated
investment grade. |
160 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Investments
in RMBS, CMBS, CDOs and ABS
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains (losses) and fair
value of AIGs investments in RMBS, CMBS, CDOs and ABS were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Bonds available for sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG, excluding AIGFP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMBS
|
|
$
|
32,092
|
|
|
$
|
645
|
|
|
$
|
(2,985
|
)
|
|
$
|
29,752
|
|
|
$
|
89,851
|
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
|
$
|
(5,504
|
)
|
|
$
|
84,780
|
|
CMBS
|
|
|
14,205
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
(3,105
|
)
|
|
|
11,226
|
|
|
|
23,918
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
(1,156
|
)
|
|
|
22,999
|
|
CDO/ABS
|
|
|
6,741
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
(843
|
)
|
|
|
6,131
|
|
|
|
10,844
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
(593
|
)
|
|
|
10,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal, excluding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIGFP
|
|
|
53,038
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
(6,933
|
)
|
|
|
47,109
|
|
|
|
124,613
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
(7,253
|
)
|
|
|
118,226
|
|
AIGFP*
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
16,369
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
|
|
16,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
53,255
|
|
|
$
|
1,004
|
|
|
$
|
(6,933
|
)
|
|
$
|
47,326
|
|
|
$
|
140,982
|
|
|
$
|
1,221
|
|
|
$
|
(7,703
|
)
|
|
$
|
134,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
The December 31, 2007 amounts represent total AIGFP
investments in mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized
securities for which AIGFP has elected the fair value option
effective January 1, 2008. At December 31, 2008, the
fair value of these securities was $12.4 billion. The
December 31, 2008 amounts represent securities for which
AIGFP has not elected the fair value option. |
Investments
in RMBS
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains (losses) and
estimated fair value of AIGs investments in RMBS
securities, other than those of AIGFP, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMBS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. agencies
|
|
$
|
12,793
|
|
|
$
|
537
|
|
|
$
|
(22
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,308
|
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
$
|
14,575
|
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
|
$
|
(70
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,825
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime non-agency(a)
|
|
|
12,744
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
(1,984
|
)
|
|
|
10,801
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
21,552
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
(550
|
)
|
|
|
21,074
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alt-A
|
|
|
4,927
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
(743
|
)
|
|
|
4,209
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
25,349
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
(1,620
|
)
|
|
|
23,746
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other housing-related(b)
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4,301
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
(357
|
)
|
|
|
3,946
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subprime
|
|
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
24,074
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(2,907
|
)
|
|
|
21,189
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
32,092
|
|
|
$
|
645
|
|
|
$
|
(2,985
|
)
|
|
$
|
29,752
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
89,851
|
|
|
$
|
433
|
|
|
$
|
(5,504
|
)
|
|
$
|
84,780
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes foreign and jumbo RMBS-related securities. |
|
(b) |
|
Primarily wrapped second-lien. |
AIGs operations, other than AIGFP, held investments in
RMBS with an estimated fair value of $29.8 billion at
December 31, 2008, or approximately 5 percent of
AIGs total invested assets. On December 12, 2008,
RMBS with an estimated fair value of $20.8 billion were
sold to ML II in connection with AIGs termination of the
U.S. securities lending program. In addition, AIGs
insurance operations held investments with a fair value totaling
$6.1 billion in CDOs/ABS, of which $14 million
included some level of subprime exposure. AIGs RMBS
investments are predominantly in highly-rated tranches that
contain substantial protection features through collateral
subordination. At December 31, 2008, approximately
82 percent of these investments were rated AAA, and
approximately 9 percent were rated AA by one or more of the
principal rating agencies. AIGs investments rated BBB or
below totaled $1.8 billion, or less than 0.28 percent
of AIGs total invested assets at December 31, 2008.
As of February 19, 2009, $5.3 billion of AIGs
RMBS portfolio had been downgraded as a result of rating agency
actions since January 1, 2007, and $130 million of
such investments had been upgraded. Of
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 161
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
the downgrades, $4.9 billion were AAA rated securities. In
addition to the downgrades, as of February 19, 2009, the
rating agencies had $951 million of RMBS on watch for
downgrade.
In 2008, AIG collected approximately $7.5 billion of
principal payments on RMBS.
The amortized cost of AIGs RMBS investments, other than
those of AIGFP, by year of vintage and credit rating, at
December 31, 2008, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year of Vintage
|
|
|
|
Prior
|
|
|
2004
|
|
|
2005
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In billions)
|
|
|
Rating:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total RMBS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
6,924
|
|
|
$
|
4,035
|
|
|
$
|
3,965
|
|
|
$
|
3,884
|
|
|
$
|
4,207
|
|
|
$
|
3,188
|
|
|
$
|
26,203
|
|
AA
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
427
|
|
|
|
825
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,796
|
|
A
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
187
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
1,288
|
|
BBB and below
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
560
|
|
|
|
785
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
1,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total RMBS
|
|
$
|
8,072
|
|
|
$
|
4,743
|
|
|
$
|
4,825
|
|
|
$
|
5,565
|
|
|
$
|
5,603
|
|
|
$
|
3,284
|
|
|
$
|
32,092
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alt-A RMBS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
677
|
|
|
$
|
526
|
|
|
$
|
662
|
|
|
$
|
740
|
|
|
$
|
832
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,437
|
|
AA
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
815
|
|
A
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
151
|
|
BBB and below
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
189
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Alt-A
|
|
$
|
940
|
|
|
$
|
617
|
|
|
$
|
895
|
|
|
$
|
1,128
|
|
|
$
|
1,347
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,927
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subprime RMBS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
630
|
|
AA
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
A
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
BBB and below
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Subprime
|
|
$
|
377
|
|
|
$
|
241
|
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prime non-agency
RMBS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
2,746
|
|
|
$
|
1,678
|
|
|
$
|
1,445
|
|
|
$
|
1,750
|
|
|
$
|
1,675
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
9,305
|
|
AA
|
|
|
551
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,552
|
|
A
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
837
|
|
BBB and below
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
471
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Subprime
|
|
$
|
3,443
|
|
|
$
|
2,071
|
|
|
$
|
1,874
|
|
|
$
|
2,801
|
|
|
$
|
2,448
|
|
|
$
|
107
|
|
|
$
|
12,744
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIGs underwriting practices for investing in RMBS, other
asset-backed securities and CDOs take into consideration the
quality of the originator, the manager, the servicer, security
credit ratings, underlying characteristics of the mortgages,
borrower characteristics, and the level of credit enhancement in
the transaction. AIGs strategy is typically to invest in
securities rated AA or better.
162 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Investments
in CMBS
The amortized cost of AIGs CMBS investments, other than
those of AIGFP, at December 31, 2008, was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
CMBS (traditional)
|
|
$
|
13,033
|
|
|
|
92
|
%
|
ReRemic/CRE CDO
|
|
|
583
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
Agency
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Other
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14,205
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The percentage of AIGs CMBS investments, other than
those of AIGFP, by credit rating, at December 31, 2008, was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Rating:
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
|
84
|
%
|
AA
|
|
|
8
|
|
A
|
|
|
6
|
|
BBB and below
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
The percentage of AIGs CMBS investments, other than
those of AIGFP, by year of vintage, at December 31, 2008,
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Year:
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
1
|
%
|
2007
|
|
|
23
|
|
2006
|
|
|
11
|
|
2005
|
|
|
17
|
|
2004
|
|
|
19
|
|
2003 and prior
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
The percentage of AIGs CMBS investments, other than
those of AIGFP, by geographic region, at December 31, 2008,
was as follows:
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 163
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Geographic region:
|
|
|
|
|
New York
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
California
|
|
|
13
|
|
Texas
|
|
|
6
|
|
Florida
|
|
|
6
|
|
Virginia
|
|
|
3
|
|
Illinois
|
|
|
3
|
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
3
|
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
3
|
|
Maryland
|
|
|
2
|
|
Georgia
|
|
|
2
|
|
All Other
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
There have been disruptions in the commercial mortgage markets
in general, and the CMBS market in particular, with credit
default swaps indices and quoted prices of securities at levels
consistent with a severe correction in lease rates, occupancy
and fair value of properties. In addition, spreads in the
primary mortgage market have widened significantly.
Investments
in CDOs
The amortized cost of AIGs CDO investments, other than
those of AIGFP, by collateral type, at December 31, 2008,
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Collateral Type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank loans (CLO)
|
|
$
|
824
|
|
|
|
61
|
%
|
Synthetic investment grade
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
Other
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
Subprime ABS
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,337
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized cost of the AIGs CDO investments, other than
those of AIGFP, by credit rating, at December 31, 2008, was
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Rating:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
AA
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
A
|
|
|
574
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
168
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Below investment grade and equity
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,337
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Commercial
Mortgage Loans
At December 31, 2008, AIG had direct commercial mortgage loan
exposure of $17.5 billion, with $15.9 billion
representing U.S. loan exposure. At that date,
substantially all of the U.S. loans were current. Foreign
commercial mortgage loans of $1.6 billion are secured
predominantly by properties in Japan. In addition, at
December 31, 2008, AIG had $2.3 billion in residential
mortgage loans in jurisdictions outside the United States,
primarily secured by properties in Taiwan and Thailand.
The U.S. commercial loan exposure by state and type of loan,
at December 31, 2008, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
# of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of
|
State
|
|
Loans
|
|
Amount
|
|
Apartments
|
|
Offices
|
|
Retails
|
|
Industrials
|
|
Hotels
|
|
Others
|
|
Total
|
|
California
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
$
|
4,357
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
1,835
|
|
|
$
|
249
|
|
|
$
|
1,089
|
|
|
$
|
506
|
|
|
$
|
543
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
New York
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
1,816
|
|
|
|
345
|
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
New Jersey
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
280
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
Florida
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
393
|
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
219
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Texas
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
1,037
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
420
|
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
269
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Pennsylvania
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
643
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
4
|
%
|
Ohio
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
444
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Maryland
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
418
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
%
|
Arizona
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Illinois
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
Other states
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
4,085
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
1,642
|
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
524
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1,290
|
|
|
$
|
15,861
|
|
|
$
|
2,126
|
|
|
$
|
6,356
|
|
|
$
|
2,388
|
|
|
$
|
2,219
|
|
|
$
|
1,136
|
|
|
$
|
1,636
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIGFP
Trading Investments
The fair value of AIGFPs fixed maturity trading
investments, at December 31, 2008, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
U.S. government and government sponsored entities
|
|
$
|
9,594
|
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
Non-U.S.
governments
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Corporate debt
|
|
|
3,530
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized
|
|
|
12,445
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
26,069
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The credit ratings of AIGFPs fixed maturity trading
investments, at December 31, 2008, were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percentage
|
|
|
Rating:
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
|
74
|
%
|
AA
|
|
|
10
|
|
A
|
|
|
11
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
3
|
|
Below investment grade
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 165
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
The fair value of AIGFPs trading investments in RMBS,
CDO, ABS and other collateralized securities was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
of Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
RMBS
|
|
$
|
3,679
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
CMBS
|
|
|
2,020
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
CDO/ABS and other collateralized
|
|
|
6,746
|
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
12,445
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These securities are used to collateralize AIGFPs secured
financing arrangements including the obligations of its asset
backed commercial paper conduit.
Securities
Lending Activities
AIGs securities lending program historically operated as
centrally managed by AIG Investments for the benefit of certain
of AIGs insurance companies. Under this program,
securities were loaned to various financial institutions,
primarily major banks and brokerage firms. Cash collateral was
received and was invested in fixed maturity securities to earn a
net spread. The amount of cash advanced by borrowers declined in
2008 due in part to the availability of alternative transactions
requiring less collateral. During the fourth quarter of 2008, in
connection with certain securities lending transactions, AIG met
the requirements of sale accounting as prescribed by
FAS 140 because collateral received was insufficient to
fund substantially all of the cost of purchasing replacement
assets. Accordingly, AIG recognized $2.4 billion of net
realized capital losses on deemed sales of the securities it had
lent. Also, net realized capital losses in 2008 included a loss
of $2.3 billion, incurred in the fourth quarter of 2008, on
RMBS prior to their purchase by ML II. Also see Note 5 to
the Consolidated Financial Statements.
A significant portion of the collateral received was invested in
RMBS with cash flows having tenors longer than the liabilities
to the counterparties. The value of those collateral securities
declined during the latter part of 2007 and throughout 2008 and
trading in such securities was extremely limited. Given these
events, AIG began increasing liquidity in the securities lending
pool by increasing the amount of cash and overnight investments
that in the third quarter of 2007 comprised the securities
lending invested collateral.
Due to AIG-specific credit concerns and systemic issues in the
financial markets in the third quarter of 2008, counterparties
began curtailing their participation in the program. As a
result, liquidity in the collateral pools became constrained. At
September 30, 2008, AIG had borrowed approximately
$11.5 billion under the Fed Facility to provide liquidity
to the securities lending program.
On October 8, 2008, AIG announced that certain of its
domestic life insurance subsidiaries had entered into a
securities lending agreement with the NY Fed pursuant to which
the NY Fed agreed to borrow, on an overnight basis, up to
$37.8 billion in investment grade fixed income securities
from these AIG subsidiaries in return for cash collateral. The
Securities Lending Agreement assisted AIG in meeting its
obligations to borrowers requesting the return of their cash
collateral.
On December 12, 2008, AIG, certain of AIGs wholly
owned U.S. life insurance subsidiaries, and AIG Securities
Lending Corp. (the AIG Agent), another AIG subsidiary, entered
into the ML II Agreement with ML II.
Pursuant to the ML II Agreement, the life insurance subsidiaries
sold to ML II all of their undivided interests in a pool of
$39.3 billion face amount of RMBS held by the AIG Agent as
agent of the life insurance subsidiaries in connection with
AIGs U.S. securities lending program. In exchange for
the RMBS, the life insurance subsidiaries received an initial
purchase price of $19.8 billion plus the right to receive
deferred contingent portions of the total purchase price of
$1 billion plus participation in the residual, each of
which is subordinated to the repayment of the NY Fed loan to
ML II. These life insurance subsidiaries applied the net
cash proceeds of sale of the RMBS toward the amounts due by such
life insurance subsidiaries in terminating both the
U.S. securities lending program and the
166 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Securities Lending Agreement. See Note 5 for further
information on the transaction with ML II. At December 31,
2008, total securities lending collateral held by AIG of
$3.8 billion represents the foreign securities lending
program, which is expected to wind down in 2009. Securities
lending payables amounted to $2.9 billion at
December 31, 2008.
The recognition of other-than-temporary impairment charges for
the securities lending collateral investments placed significant
stress on the statutory surplus of the participating insurance
companies. During 2008, AIG recognized other-than-temporary
impairment charges of $18.2 billion related to these
investments, including $6.9 billion of charges related to
AIGs change in intent to hold these securities to maturity
as it winds this program down. During 2008, AIG contributed
$21.5 billion to certain of its Domestic Life Insurance and
Domestic Retirement Services subsidiaries, largely related to
these charges.
Portfolio
Review
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments
AIG assesses its ability to hold any fixed maturity security in
an unrealized loss position to its recovery, including fixed
maturity securities classified as available for sale, at each
balance sheet date. The decision to sell any such fixed maturity
security classified as available for sale reflects the judgment
of AIGs management that the security sold is unlikely to
provide, on a relative value basis, as attractive a return in
the future as alternative securities entailing comparable risks.
With respect to distressed securities, the sale decision
reflects managements judgment that the risk-discounted
anticipated ultimate recovery is less than the value achievable
on sale.
AIG evaluates its investments for impairments in valuation as
well as credit. The determination that a security has incurred
an other-than-temporary decline in value requires the judgment
of management and consideration of the fundamental condition of
the issuer, its near-term prospects and all the relevant facts
and circumstances. See Critical Accounting Estimates
Other-Than-Temporary Impairments herein for further information.
Once a security has been identified as other-than-temporarily
impaired, the amount of such impairment is determined by
reference to that securitys contemporaneous fair value and
recorded as a charge to earnings.
As a result of AIGs periodic evaluation of its securities
for other-than-temporary impairments in value, AIG recorded
other-than-temporary impairment charges of $50.8 billion,
$4.7 billion (including $643 million related to AIGFP
recorded on other income) and $944 million in 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively.
In light of the recent significant disruption in the
U.S. residential mortgage and credit markets, AIG has
recognized an other-than-temporary impairment charge (severity
loss) of $29.1 billion in 2008, primarily related to
mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collaterized securities and
securities of financial institutions. Notwithstanding AIGs
intent and ability to hold such securities until they have
recovered their cost basis, and despite structures that indicate
that a substantial amount of the securities should continue to
perform in accordance with original terms, AIG concluded that it
could not reasonably assert that the impairment would be
temporary.
Pricing of CMBS has been adversely affected by market
perceptions that underlying mortgage defaults will increase. As
a result, AIG recognized $6.2 billion of
other-than-temporary impairment charges in 2008 on CMBS valued
at a severe discount to cost, despite the absence of any
meaningful deterioration in performance of the underlying
credits, because AIG concluded that it could not reasonably
assert that the impairment period was temporary. In addition,
AIG recognized $527 million in other-than-temporary
impairment charges due to the change in intent to hold these
CMBS until they recover in value and $245 million due to
issuer-specific credit events.
Certain high quality, highly rated securities in the CMBS
portfolio experienced severe market price declines in late 2008.
With respect to this portfolio, AIG has performed extensive
internal fundamental credit risk analysis on a
security-by-security
basis, including consideration of credit enhancements and
expected defaults on underlying collateral. In managements
view, this internal analysis, supplemented by relevant industry
analyst reports and forecasts and other market available data,
provides persuasive evidence sufficient to overcome the premise
that such severe declines in fair value below amortized cost
should be considered other than temporary. As a result,
impairment charges were not taken on certain CMBS having fair
values $1.8 billion below amortized cost.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 167
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
In addition to the above severity losses, AIG recorded
other-than-temporary impairment charges in 2008, 2007 and 2006
related to:
|
|
|
|
|
securities that AIG does not intend to hold until recovery;
|
|
|
|
declines due to foreign exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
issuer-specific credit events;
|
|
|
|
certain structured securities impaired under
EITF 99-20
and related interpretative guidance; and
|
|
|
|
other impairments, including equity securities and partnership
investments.
|
Other-than-temporary impairment charges by segment were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Management
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment Type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severity
|
|
$
|
2,667
|
|
|
$
|
21,096
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
$
|
5,288
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
29,146
|
|
Lack of intent to hold to recovery
|
|
|
388
|
|
|
|
10,975
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,110
|
|
Foreign currency declines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,903
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,903
|
|
Issuer-specific credit events
|
|
|
1,471
|
|
|
|
3,385
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
|
5,985
|
|
Adverse projected cash flows on structured securities
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1,372
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,661
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,533
|
|
|
$
|
38,731
|
|
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
$
|
7,276
|
|
|
$
|
138
|
|
|
$
|
50,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment Type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severity
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
1,070
|
|
|
$
|
643
|
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,200
|
|
Lack of intent to hold to recovery
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
885
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
Foreign currency declines
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
Issuer-specific credit events
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
515
|
|
Adverse projected cash flows on structured securities
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
|
$
|
2,798
|
|
|
$
|
650
|
|
|
$
|
835
|
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
4,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairment Type:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lack of intent to hold to recovery
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
473
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
636
|
|
Issuer-specific credit events
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
262
|
|
Adverse projected cash flows on structured securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
168 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Other-than-temporary severity-related impairment charges by
type of security and credit rating were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
Rating:
|
|
RMBS
|
|
|
CDO
|
|
|
CMBS
|
|
|
Institutions
|
|
|
Securities
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
December 31, 2008*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
8,832
|
|
|
$
|
369
|
|
|
$
|
3,684
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
13,100
|
|
AA
|
|
|
3,139
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
987
|
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
|
5,155
|
|
A
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
|
|
1,490
|
|
|
|
1,194
|
|
|
|
1,074
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
5,058
|
|
BBB and below
|
|
|
1,251
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
640
|
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
|
3,305
|
|
Nonrated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
Equities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
521
|
|
|
|
1,780
|
|
|
|
2,301
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
14,384
|
|
|
$
|
3,115
|
|
|
$
|
6,192
|
|
|
$
|
2,662
|
|
|
$
|
2,793
|
|
|
$
|
29,146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed Maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
168
|
|
|
$
|
621
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
789
|
|
AA
|
|
|
870
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
929
|
|
A
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
175
|
|
BBB and below
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Nonrated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,132
|
|
|
$
|
706
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
$
|
2,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Ratings are as of the date of the impairment charge. |
Financial institutions industry other-than-temporary
impairment charges by industry classification were, at
December 31, 2008, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lack of Intent to
|
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
Issuer-Specific
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severity
|
|
|
Hold to Recovery
|
|
|
Decline
|
|
|
Credit Events
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Industry Classification:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banking
|
|
$
|
1,568
|
|
|
$
|
1,270
|
|
|
$
|
267
|
|
|
$
|
526
|
|
|
$
|
3,631
|
|
Brokerage
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
1,740
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
557
|
|
Other
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
|
1,345
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,662
|
|
|
$
|
2,130
|
|
|
$
|
344
|
|
|
$
|
2,137
|
|
|
$
|
7,273
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial institutions other-than-temporary impairment charges
were immaterial in 2007 and 2006.
No other-than-temporary impairment charge with respect to any
one single credit was significant to AIGs consolidated
financial condition or results of operations, and no individual
other-than-temporary impairment charge exceeded
three percent of consolidated shareholders equity in 2008.
In periods subsequent to the recognition of an
other-than-temporary impairment charge for fixed maturity
securities, that is not credit or foreign exchange related, AIG
generally accretes into income the discount or amortizes the
reduced premium resulting from the reduction in cost basis over
the remaining life of the security. The amount of accretion
recognized in earnings for 2008 was $634 million.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 169
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
An aging of the pre-tax unrealized losses of fixed maturity
and equity securities, distributed as a percentage of cost
relative to unrealized loss (the extent by which the fair value
is less than amortized cost or cost), including the number of
respective items was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Less than or equal
|
|
|
Greater than 20%
|
|
|
Greater than 50%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to 20% of Cost(b)
|
|
|
to 50% of Cost(b)
|
|
|
of Cost(b)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
Aging(a)
|
|
Cost(c)
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Items
|
|
|
Cost(c)
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Items
|
|
|
Cost(c)
|
|
|
Loss(g)
|
|
|
Items
|
|
|
Cost(c)
|
|
|
Loss(d)
|
|
|
Items
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Investment grade bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-6 months
|
|
$
|
65,631
|
|
|
$
|
3,679
|
|
|
|
9,213
|
|
|
$
|
10,800
|
|
|
$
|
3,076
|
|
|
|
1,803
|
|
|
$
|
772
|
|
|
$
|
198
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
77,203
|
|
|
$
|
6,953
|
|
|
|
11,049
|
|
7-12 months
|
|
|
44,863
|
|
|
|
3,119
|
|
|
|
6,295
|
|
|
|
12,152
|
|
|
|
3,269
|
|
|
|
1,291
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
57,682
|
|
|
|
6,756
|
|
|
|
7,648
|
|
> 12 months
|
|
|
32,604
|
|
|
|
2,976
|
|
|
|
4,707
|
|
|
|
20,330
|
|
|
|
5,920
|
|
|
|
2,534
|
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
54,484
|
|
|
|
9,785
|
|
|
|
7,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
143,098
|
|
|
$
|
9,774
|
|
|
|
20,215
|
|
|
$
|
43,282
|
|
|
$
|
12,265
|
|
|
|
5,628
|
|
|
$
|
2,989
|
|
|
$
|
1,455
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
$
|
189,369
|
|
|
$
|
23,494
|
|
|
|
26,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below investment grade bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-6 months
|
|
$
|
4,785
|
|
|
$
|
189
|
|
|
|
1,925
|
|
|
$
|
668
|
|
|
$
|
182
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,453
|
|
|
$
|
371
|
|
|
|
2,056
|
|
7-12 months
|
|
|
1,556
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
501
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,158
|
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
|
579
|
|
> 12 months
|
|
|
1,339
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
|
489
|
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,828
|
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
|
402
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,680
|
|
|
$
|
343
|
|
|
|
2,698
|
|
|
$
|
1,759
|
|
|
$
|
488
|
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,439
|
|
|
$
|
831
|
|
|
|
3,037
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-6 months
|
|
$
|
70,416
|
|
|
$
|
3,868
|
|
|
|
11,138
|
|
|
$
|
11,468
|
|
|
$
|
3,258
|
|
|
|
1,934
|
|
|
$
|
772
|
|
|
$
|
198
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
82,656
|
|
|
$
|
7,324
|
|
|
|
13,105
|
|
7-12 months
|
|
|
46,419
|
|
|
|
3,207
|
|
|
|
6,796
|
|
|
|
12,754
|
|
|
|
3,433
|
|
|
|
1,369
|
|
|
|
667
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
59,840
|
|
|
|
7,008
|
|
|
|
8,227
|
|
> 12 months
|
|
|
33,943
|
|
|
|
3,042
|
|
|
|
4,979
|
|
|
|
20,819
|
|
|
|
6,062
|
|
|
|
2,664
|
|
|
|
1,550
|
|
|
|
889
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
56,312
|
|
|
|
9,993
|
|
|
|
7,736
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(e)
|
|
$
|
150,778
|
|
|
$
|
10,117
|
|
|
|
22,913
|
|
|
$
|
45,041
|
|
|
$
|
12,753
|
(f)
|
|
|
5,967
|
|
|
$
|
2,989
|
|
|
$
|
1,455
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
$
|
198,808
|
|
|
$
|
24,325
|
|
|
|
29,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0-6 months
|
|
$
|
1,835
|
|
|
$
|
165
|
|
|
|
38,389
|
|
|
$
|
1,072
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
|
960
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
2,911
|
|
|
$
|
516
|
|
|
|
39,438
|
|
7-12 months
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
446
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
838
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
591
|
|
> 12 months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,221
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
|
38,633
|
|
|
$
|
1,518
|
|
|
$
|
505
|
|
|
|
1,260
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
$
|
3,749
|
|
|
$
|
719
|
|
|
|
40,029
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents the number of consecutive months that fair value
has been less than cost by any amount. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Represents the percentage by which fair value is less than
cost at the balance sheet date. |
|
(c) |
|
For bonds, represents amortized cost. |
|
(d) |
|
The effect on net income of unrealized losses after taxes
will be mitigated upon realization because certain realized
losses will be charged to participating policyholder accounts,
or realization will result in current decreases in the
amortization of certain DAC. |
|
(e) |
|
Includes securities lending invested collateral. |
|
(f) |
|
Of this $12.8 billion, $4.5 billion relates to
RMBS, CMBS, CDOs and ABS with unrealized losses greater than
25 percent; and $791 million relates to RMBS, CMBS,
CDOs and ABS with unrealized losses between 20 percent and
25 percent. The balance represents all other classes of
fixed maturity securities. |
|
(g) |
|
Total bonds unrealized loss of $1.5 billion represents
CMBS not deemed other than temporarily impaired based on credit
analysis. |
170 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
The aging of the unrealized losses of RMBS, CMBS, CDOs and
ABS with fair values greater than 20 percent and
50 percent less than their cost at December 31, 2008
(in footnote (f) to the table above) is shown in the table
below, which provides the period in which those securities in
unrealized loss positions would become candidates for impairment
solely because they have been trading at a discount for nine
consecutive months (AIGs other-than-temporary aging
guideline) without regard to the level of discount (AIGs
other-than-temporary trading level guideline), assuming prices
remained unchanged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First
|
|
|
Second
|
|
|
Third
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
Quarter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Unrealized loss percent:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Greater than 25 percent
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
275
|
|
|
$
|
4,181
|
|
|
$
|
4,502
|
|
20 to less than 25 percent
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
791
|
|
|
$
|
791
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Given the current difficult market conditions, AIG is not able
to predict reasonably likely changes in the prices of these
securities. Moreover, AIG is unable to assess the effect, if
any, that potential sales of securities pursuant to TARP will
have on the pricing of its available for sale securities.
Unrealized
gains and losses
At December 31, 2008, the carrying value of AIGs
available for sale fixed maturity and equity securities
aggregated $375.3 billion. At December 31, 2008,
aggregate pre-tax unrealized gains for fixed maturity and equity
securities were $14.8 billion ($9.6 billion after tax).
At December 31, 2008, the aggregate pre-tax gross
unrealized losses on fixed maturity and equity securities were
$25.0 billion ($16.3 billion after tax). Additional
information about these securities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
These securities were valued, in the aggregate, at approximately
88 percent of their current amortized cost.
|
|
|
|
Approximately 24 percent of these securities were valued at
less than 20 percent of their current cost, or amortized
cost.
|
|
|
|
Approximately five percent of the fixed maturity securities had
issuer credit ratings which were below investment grade.
|
AIG did not consider these securities in an unrealized loss
position to be other-than-temporarily impaired at
December 31, 2008, because management has the intent and
ability to hold these investments until they recover their cost
basis within a recovery period deemed to be temporary. In
performing this evaluation, management considered the market
recovery periods for securities in previous periods of broad
market declines. In addition, for certain securities with more
significant declines, management performed extended fundamental
credit analysis on a
security-by-security
basis including consideration of credit enhancements, expected
defaults on underlying collateral, review of relevant industry
analyst reports and forecasts and other market available data.
In managements view this analysis provides persuasive
evidence sufficient to conclude that such severe declines in
fair value below amortized cost should not be considered other
than temporary.
In 2008, unrealized losses related to investment grade bonds
increased $10.6 billion ($6.9 billion after tax),
reflecting the widening of credit spreads, partially offset by
the effects of a decline in risk-free interest rates.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 171
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
The amortized cost and fair value of fixed maturity
securities available for sale in an unrealized loss position by
contractual maturity were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
6,037
|
|
|
$
|
6,023
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
41,782
|
|
|
|
37,862
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
48,025
|
|
|
|
42,439
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
71,717
|
|
|
|
63,840
|
|
Mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized
|
|
|
31,247
|
|
|
|
24,319
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
198,808
|
|
|
$
|
174,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2008, the pre-tax gross
realized losses incurred with respect to the sale of fixed
maturities and equity securities were $13.4 billion. The
aggregate fair value of securities sold was $97 billion,
which was approximately 88 percent of amortized cost. The
average period of time that securities sold at a loss during
2008 were trading continuously at a price below book value was
approximately eight months. See Risk Management
Credit Risk Management herein for an additional discussion of
investment risks associated with AIGs investment portfolio.
Certain of AIGs foreign subsidiaries included in the
consolidated financial statements report on a fiscal year ended
November 30. The effect on AIGs consolidated
financial condition and results of operations of all material
events occurring between November 30 and December 31 for all
periods presented has been recorded. AIG determined the
significant appreciation in world-wide fixed income and equity
markets in December 2008 to be an intervening event that had a
material effect on its consolidated financial condition and
results of operations. AIG reflected the December 2008 market
appreciation throughout its investment portfolio. Accordingly,
AIG recorded $5.6 billion ($3.6 billion after tax) of
unrealized appreciation on investments.
Risk
Management
Overview
The continued unprecedented market turmoil, which began in the
U.S. housing sector but which has expanded to other sectors
of the economy, led to severe price declines and reduced
liquidity of highly-rated asset-backed securities, including
residential mortgage-backed securities and related
collateralized debt obligations. Structured finance securities
suffered the greatest valuation losses among fixed income asset
classes, starting with residential mortgage-backed securities
with sub-prime collateral in late 2007, followed by commercial
mortgage-backed securities in late 2008. The current environment
is such that liquidity is very limited in all fixed income and
alternative asset classes.
AIGs investment goal in its insurance investment
portfolios is to purchase assets with acceptable credit quality
that will generate over time an acceptable spread over
AIGs insurance related liabilities. The process by which
AIG assesses acceptable credit quality is further described
below under Credit Risk Management. Because accounting
implications have not been a factor in determining AIGs
investment decisions, AIG has historically not set limits on its
exposure to volatility of reported financial results from
fluctuations in market credit spreads. The environment for
securities pricing in 2008, resulting from widening of credit
spreads of unprecedented proportions in many asset classes, has
caused material and adverse effects on AIGs results of
operations, financial condition and cash flow.
The unanticipated price declines and associated reduction of
liquidity exceeded the parameters historically used by AIG for
purposes of its asset-liability and liquidity management
processes. AIG is responding to these developments by enhancing
its risk management processes and de-risking certain exposures,
based upon enhanced scenario-related stress testing. AIGs
de-risking strategies have resulted in the following:
|
|
|
|
|
reduction of certain foreign exchange exposures at the local
entity level by selling or hedging investments denominated in
non-local currencies;
|
|
|
|
reduction of certain foreign exchange exposures at the AIG level
by hedging
non-U.S. dollar
exposures; and
|
172 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
reduction of regulatory capital charges and volatility of
earnings by selling certain equity and alternative investments,
including common stock, mutual funds and real estate investments.
|
However, the continuation of such market turmoil and associated
price declines and limited liquidity have severely constrained
AIGs ability to utilize techniques for mitigating its
exposure to credit, market and liquidity risks.
AIG has been reassessing its risk management control environment
and its enterprise risk management functions, both in its
individual businesses as well as at the corporate level, in
light of AIGs current situation. AIG continues to invest
in risk management systems and processes where those investments
are consistent with AIGs current liquidity, capital and
disposition plans.
The major risks to which AIG is exposed include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Credit risk the potential loss arising from
an obligors inability or unwillingness to meet its
obligations to AIG.
|
|
|
|
Market risk the potential loss arising from
adverse fluctuations in interest rates, foreign currencies,
equity and commodity prices, and their levels of volatility.
Market risk includes credit spread risk, the potential loss
arising from adverse fluctuations in credit spreads of
securities or counterparties.
|
|
|
|
Operational risk the potential loss resulting
from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, and
systems, or from external events.
|
|
|
|
Liquidity risk the potential inability to
meet all payment obligations when they become due.
|
|
|
|
General insurance risk the potential loss
resulting from inadequate premiums, insufficient reserves and
catastrophic exposures.
|
|
|
|
Life insurance risk the potential loss
resulting from experience deviating from expectations for
mortality, morbidity and termination rates in the
insurance-oriented products and insufficient cash flows to cover
contract liabilities in the retirement savings products.
|
AIG is also exposed to reputational risk, which is defined as
the risk of direct loss or loss in future business because of
damage to AIGs reputation. Damage to the companys
reputation can arise from a large number of issues, including
potential conflicts of interest; legal and regulatory
requirements; ethical issues; and sales and trading practices.
In addition, reputational risk can be both the cause of or
result from the major risks outlined above.
The primary responsibility for risk management lies with the
business executives within AIGs segments. The business
executives are responsible for establishing and maintaining risk
management processes in their areas of activity under the risk
management framework established by AIG senior management, and
responding to their specific business needs and issues,
including risk concentrations within their respective
businesses. The primary focus of corporate risk management is to
provide oversight of these processes in the businesses and to
assess the risk of AIG incurring economic losses from
concentrations of risk in the risk categories outlined above.
Corporate
Risk Governance
AIGs major risks are addressed at the corporate level
through Enterprise Risk Management (ERM), which is headed by
AIGs Chief Risk Officer (CRO). ERM reports to the Chief
Executive Officer and is responsible for assisting AIGs
business leaders, executive management and Board of Directors to
identify, assess, quantify, manage and mitigate the risks
incurred by AIG.
An important goal of ERM is to ensure that, after appropriate
governance, authorities, procedures and policies have been
established, aggregated risks do not result in inappropriate
concentrations. Senior management defines the policies and has
established general operating parameters for its global
businesses and various oversight committees to monitor the risks
attendant to its businesses. These committees include the Credit
Risk Committee (CRC), Liquidity Risk Committee (LRC),
Catastrophic & Emerging Risks Committee (CERC),
Complex Structured Finance Transaction Committee (CSFTC) and
Global and Regional Pricing Committees.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 173
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
The CRC is responsible for the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
approving credit risk policies and procedures for use throughout
AIG;
|
|
|
|
delegating credit authority to business unit credit officers and
select business unit managers;
|
|
|
|
approving transaction requests and limits for corporate,
sovereign, structured finance and cross-border credit exposures
that exceed delegated authorities;
|
|
|
|
establishing and maintaining AIGs risk rating process for
corporate, financial and sovereign obligors;
|
|
|
|
conducting regular reviews of credit risk exposures in the
portfolios of all credit-incurring business units; and
|
|
|
|
reviewing all credit concentration risks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The LRC is responsible for liquidity policy and implementation
at AIG Parent and exercises oversight and control of liquidity
policies at each AIG entity. See Capital Resources and Liquidity
herein.
|
|
|
|
The CERC was formed in June 2008 to enhance and consolidate
AIGs existing processes to analyze, discuss, quantify and
report to senior management the risks to AIG of potential
catastrophic events that have been insured by AIGs various
divisions. The committee meets regularly and discusses potential
events and emerging risks that may materialize in the future.
The committees membership includes senior underwriting,
actuarial, and risk management professionals.
|
|
|
|
A CSFT is any AIG transaction or product that may involve a
heightened legal, regulatory, accounting or reputational risk
that is developed, marketed or proposed by AIG or a third-party
The CSFTC has the authority and responsibility to review and
approve any proposed CSFT. The CSFTC provides guidance to and
monitors the activities of transaction review committees (TRCs)
which have been established in all major business units. TRCs
have the responsibility to identify, review and refer CSFTs to
the CSFTC.
|
AIG developed and implemented a Global Pricing Committee in the
first quarter of 2008 to address the requirements of
FAS 157. The Global Pricing Committee provides oversight of
AIGs pricing valuation practices and processes and has
delegated operational responsibility to five Regional Pricing
Committees to implement and monitor these practices within the
underlying businesses of each respective region.
Credit
Risk Management
AIG devotes considerable resources to managing its direct and
indirect credit exposures, such as those arising from fixed
income investments, deposits, corporate and consumer loans,
leases, reinsurance recoverables, counterparty risk in
derivatives activities, cessions of insurance risk to reinsurers
and customers, credit risk assumed through credit derivatives
written, financial guarantees and letters of credit. Credit risk
is defined as the risk that AIGs customers or
counterparties are unable or unwilling to repay their
contractual obligations when they become due. Credit risk may
also be manifested: (i) through the downgrading of credit
ratings of counterparties whose credit instruments AIG may be
holding, or, in some cases, insuring, causing the value of the
assets to decline or insured risks to rise; and (ii) as
cross-border risk where a country (sovereign government risk) or
one or more non-sovereign obligors within a country are unable
to repay an obligation or are unable to provide foreign exchange
to service a credit or equity exposure incurred by another AIG
business unit located outside that country.
AIGs credit risks are managed at the corporate level by
the Credit Risk Management department (CRM) whose primary role
is to support and supplement the work of the businesses and the
CRC. CRM is headed by AIGs Chief Credit Officer (CCO), who
reports to AIGs CRO. AIGs CCO is primarily
responsible for the development and maintenance of credit risk
policies and procedures approved by the CRC. In discharging this
function CRM has the following responsibilities:
|
|
|
|
|
approve delegated credit authorities to CRM credit executives
and business unit credit officers;
|
|
|
|
manage the approval process for all requests for credit limits,
program limits and transactions above delegated authorities;
|
174 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
aggregate globally all credit exposure data by counterparty,
country and industry and report risk concentrations regularly to
and review with the CRC and the Finance Committee of the Board
of Directors;
|
|
|
|
administer regular portfolio credit reviews of all investment,
derivative and credit-incurring business units and recommend any
corrective actions where required;
|
|
|
|
develop methodologies for quantification and assessment of
credit risks, including the establishment and maintenance of
AIGs internal risk rating process; and
|
|
|
|
approve appropriate credit reserves and methodologies at the
business unit and enterprise levels.
|
The CRC also approves concentration limits on U.S. and
international business unit consumer loan portfolios, including
the mortgage insurance activities of UGC. In addition, the CRC
is also responsible for establishing concentration limits on AIG
Investments exposures in U.S. and international
residential and commercial mortgage-backed securities and
collateralized debt obligations.
AIG monitors and controls its company-wide credit risk
concentrations and attempts to avoid unwanted or excessive risk
accumulations, whether funded or unfunded. To minimize the level
of credit risk in certain circumstances, AIG may require
third-party guarantees, reinsurance or collateral, such as
letters of credit and trust account deposits. These guarantees,
letters of credit and reinsurance recoverables are also treated
as credit exposure and are added to AIGs risk
concentration exposure data.
AIG defines its aggregate credit exposures to a counterparty as
the sum of its fixed maturities, loans, finance leases,
reinsurance recoverables, derivatives (mark-to-market), deposits
and letters of credit (both in the case of financial
institutions) and the specified credit equivalent exposure to
certain insurance products which embody credit risk.
The following table presents AIGs largest credit
exposures as a percentage of total shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Exposure
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as a Percentage of Total
|
|
Category
|
|
Risk Rating(a)
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
Investment Grade:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 largest combined
|
|
|
A+ (weighted average
|
)(b)
|
|
|
173.8
|
%
|
Single largest non-sovereign (financial institution)
|
|
|
A-
|
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
Single largest corporate
|
|
|
AA
|
|
|
|
9.4
|
|
Single largest sovereign
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
|
|
35.6
|
|
Non-Investment Grade:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single largest sovereign
|
|
|
BB-
|
|
|
|
3.3
|
|
Single largest non-sovereign
|
|
|
BB
|
|
|
|
1.4
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Risk rating is based on the lower of AIGs internal risk
ratings or the external ratings of the major rating agencies. |
|
(b) |
|
Five of the ten largest credit exposures are to financial
institutions and four are to investment-grade rated sovereigns;
none is rated lower than BBB or its equivalent. |
AIG monitors its aggregate cross-border exposures by country and
regional group of countries. AIG defines its cross-border
exposure to include both cross-border credit exposures and its
cross-border investments in its own international subsidiaries.
Ten countries had cross-border exposures in excess of
20 percent of total shareholders equity at
December 31, 2008. At that date, seven were AAA-rated two
were AA-rated and one was A-rated.
In addition, AIG reviews and manages its industry
concentrations. AIGs single largest industry credit
exposure is to the global financial institutions sector,
comprised of banks, securities firms, life and non-life
insurance companies, reinsurance companies, finance companies
and government-sponsored entities.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 175
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
The following table presents AIGs largest credit
exposures to the global financial institution sector as a
percentage of total consolidated shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Exposure
|
|
|
|
as a Percentage of
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
Industry Category:
|
|
|
|
|
Money Center / Global Bank Groups
|
|
|
160.0
|
%
|
Global Life Insurance Companies
|
|
|
30.8
|
|
European Regional Financial Institutions
|
|
|
28.2
|
|
Global Reinsurance Companies
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
Global Securities Companies
|
|
|
18.8
|
|
Asian Regional Financial Institutions
|
|
|
15.8
|
|
North American-Based Regional Financial Institutions
|
|
|
15.7
|
|
Government-Sponsored Entities
|
|
|
12.8
|
|
Non-Life Insurance Companies
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
AIGs exposure to its five largest money center/global bank
group institutions was 65.6 percent of shareholders
equity at December 31, 2008.
AIGs exposure to global financial institutions includes
$6.6 billion of preferred stock and Tier 1 securities,
$1.4 billion of upper Tier 2 securities and
$7.5 billion of lower Tier 2 securities. These
securities can be subject to a higher risk of dividend or
interest deferral and principal non-payment or non-redemption
because they provide various levels of capital support to these
institutions, and may be subject to regulatory and contractual
restrictions. These securities are held by various AIG
subsidiaries and are diversified by obligor and country. In
addition, AIGs financial institution exposures include
other subordinated securities totaling $20.0 billion.
AIGs other industry credit concentrations in excess of
20 percent of total consolidated shareholders equity
are in the following industries (in descending order by
approximate size):
|
|
|
|
|
oil and gas companies;
|
|
|
|
electric and water utilities; and
|
|
|
|
global telecommunications companies.
|
Some of AIGs exposures are insured (wrapped)
by financial guarantor insurance companies, also known as
monoline insurers, which at December 31, 2008,
provided AIG over $36 billion (carrying value) in financial
support. The monoline insurers, many of which now have
non-investment grade credit ratings, provide support
predominantly in the United States. AIG does not rely on the
monoline insurance as its principal source of repayment when
evaluating securities for purchase. All investment securities
are evaluated primarily based on the underlying cash flow
generation capacities of the issuer or cash flow characteristics
of the security.
The CRC reviews quarterly concentration reports in all
categories listed above as well as credit trends by risk
ratings. The CRC may adjust limits to provide reasonable
assurance that AIG does not incur excessive levels of credit
risk and that AIGs credit risk profile is properly
calibrated across business units.
Market
Risk Management
AIG is exposed to market risks, primarily within its insurance
and capital markets businesses (see Overview
Outlook Financial Services on Capital Markets
regarding its market risk issues and management as transactions
in that business are wound down). For AIGs insurance
operations, the asset-liability exposures are predominantly
structural in nature, and not the result of speculative
positioning to take advantage of short-term market
opportunities. For example, the business model of life insurance
and retirement savings is to collect premiums or deposits from
policyholders and invest the proceeds in predominantly
long-term, credit based assets. A spread is earned over time
between the asset yield and the funding cost payable to
policyholders. The asset and liability profiles are managed so
that the cash flows resulting from invested assets are
sufficient to meet policyholder obligations when
176 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
they become due without the need to sell assets prematurely into
a potentially distressed market. In periods of severe market
volatility, as currently being experienced, depressed and
illiquid market values on otherwise performing investments
diminish shareholders equity even without the realization
of actual credit event related losses. Such diminution of
capital strength is causing downward pressure on the
markets assessment of the financial strength and the
credit ratings of insurers.
The Market Risk Management function (MRM), which reports to the
CRO, is responsible for control and oversight of market risks in
all aspects of AIGs financial services, insurance, and
investment activities.
AIGs market exposures can be categorized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Benchmark interest rates. Benchmark interest
rates are also known as risk-free interest rates and are
associated with either the government / treasury yield
curve or the swap curve. The fair value of AIGs
significant fixed maturity securities portfolio changes as
benchmark interest rates change.
|
|
|
|
Credit spread or risk premium. Credit spread
risk is the potential for loss due to a change in an
instruments risk premium or yield relative to that of a
comparable-duration, default-free instrument.
|
|
|
|
Equity and alternative investment
prices. AIGs exposure to equity and
alternative investment prices arises from direct investments in
common stocks and mutual funds, from minimum benefit guarantees
embedded in the structure of certain variable annuity and
variable life insurance products and from other equity-like
investments, such as partnerships comprised of hedge funds and
private equity funds, private equity investments, commercial
real estate and real estate funds.
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency exchange rates. AIG is a
globally diversified enterprise with significant income, assets
and liabilities denominated in and significant capital deployed
in a variety of currencies.
|
AIG uses a number of measures and approaches to measure and
quantify its market risk exposure, including:
|
|
|
|
|
Duration / key rate
duration. Duration is the measure of the
sensitivities of a fixed-income instrument to the parallel shift
in the benchmark yield curve. Key rate duration measures
sensitivities to the movement at a given term point on the yield
curve.
|
|
|
|
Scenario analysis. Scenario analysis uses
historical, hypothetical, or forward-looking macro-economic
scenarios to assess and report exposures. Examples of
hypothetical scenarios include a 100 basis point parallel
shift in the yield curve or a 10 percent immediate and
simultaneous decrease in world-wide equity markets.
|
|
|
|
Value-at-Risk
(VaR). VaR is a summary statistical measure that
uses the estimated volatility and correlation of market factors
to calculate the maximum loss that could occur over a defined
period of time with a specified level of statistical confidence.
VaR measures not only the size of individual exposures but also
the interaction between different market exposures, thereby
providing a portfolio approach to measuring market risk. A key
shortcoming of the VaR approach is its reliance on historical
data, making VaR calculations essentially backward
looking. This shortcoming was most evident during the
current credit crisis.
|
|
|
|
Stress testing. Stress testing is a special
form of scenario analysis whereby the scenarios used are
designed to lead to a material adverse outcome (for example, the
stock market crash of October 1987 or the widening of yields or
spread of RMBS or CMBS during 2008). Stress testing is often
used to address VaR shortcomings and complement VaR
calculations. Particularly in times of significant volatility in
financial markets, using stress scenarios provides more
pertinent and forward-looking information on market risk
exposure than VaR results based upon historical data alone.
|
The magnitudes of volatilities of financial markets and degree
of correlation among different markets, risks and asset classes
in 2008 were unprecedented and rendered the VaR measure that is
based on historical data analysis a much less reliable and
indicative risk measure. As a result, AIG believes that the
historical data based VaR measure does not effectively convey
the market risks to which AIG is subject. Therefore, as an
alternative, AIG has used sensitivities under specific scenarios
to convey the magnitude of its exposures to various key market
risk factors, such as yield curve, equity markets and
alternative assets, and foreign currency exchange rates. For
Insurance, Asset Management, and Financial Services (excluding
Capital Markets), these sensitivities and scenarios are shown in
the table below.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 177
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Insurance,
Asset Management and Financial Services (excluding Capital
Markets) Sensitivities
The following table provides estimates of AIGs
sensitivity to a yield curve upward shift, equity losses and
foreign currency exchange rate losses at December 31,
2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exposure
|
|
|
Sensitivity Factor
|
|
Effect
|
|
(dollars in millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yield Curve
|
|
$
|
500,000
|
|
|
100 bps parallel upward shift in all yield curves
|
|
$
|
23,500
|
|
Equity and Alternative Investments
|
|
$
|
47,000
|
|
|
15% drop in stock prices and value of alternative investments
|
|
$
|
7,050
|
|
Foreign Currency Exchange Rates
|
|
$
|
17,000
|
|
|
10% depreciation of all foreign currency exchange rates against
the U.S. dollar
|
|
$
|
1,700
|
|
Exposures for yield curves include assets that are directly
sensitive to yield curve movements, such as fixed-maturity
securities, loans, finance receivables and short-term
investments (excluding consolidated separate account assets per
SOP 03-1).
Exposures for equity and alternative investment prices include
investments in common stocks, preferred stocks, mutual funds,
hedge funds, private equity funds, commercial real estate and
real estate funds (excluding consolidated separate account
assets per
SOP 03-1
and consolidated managed partnerships and funds). Exposures to
foreign currency exchange rates reflect AIGs consolidated
non-U.S. dollar
net capital investments on a GAAP basis.
The above sensitivities of a 100 bps upward shift in yield
curves, a 15 percent drop in equities and alternative
assets, and a 10 percent depreciation of all foreign
currency exchange rates against the U.S. dollar were chosen
solely for illustrative purposes. The selection of these
specific events should not be construed as a prediction, but
only as a demonstration of the potential effects of such events.
These scenarios should not be construed as the only risks AIG
faces; these events are shown as an indication of several
possible losses AIG could experience. In addition, losses from
these and other risks could be materially higher than
illustrated.
The sensitivity factors presented above were selected based on
historical data from 1987 to 2007, as follows (see the table
below):
|
|
|
|
|
a 100 basis point parallel shift in the yield curve is
consistent with a one standard deviation movement of the
benchmark ten-year treasury yield;
|
|
|
|
a 15 percent drop for equity and alternative investments is
consistent with a one standard deviation movement in the
S&P 500; and
|
|
|
|
a 10 percent depreciation of foreign currency exchange
rates is consistent with a one standard deviation movement in
the USD/JPY exchange rate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standard
|
|
|
Suggested
|
|
|
Scenario as a
|
|
|
2008 Change/
|
|
|
2008 as a
|
|
|
|
Period
|
|
|
Deviation
|
|
|
Scenario
|
|
|
Multiple of SD
|
|
|
Return
|
|
|
Multiple of SD
|
|
|
10-Year Treasury (bps)
|
|
|
1987-2007
|
|
|
|
98.1
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
(185.0
|
)%
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
S&P 500
|
|
|
1987-2007
|
|
|
|
16.1
|
%
|
|
|
15.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
(38.5
|
)%
|
|
|
2.4
|
|
USD/JPY
|
|
|
1987-2007
|
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
23.3
|
%
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
Total non-trading market risk based on AIGs previously
reported VaR measure resulted in total non-trading market risk
of $10.4 billion at December 31, 2008 compared to
$5.6 billion at December 31, 2007. The increase in VaR
primarily results from much higher volatilities in financial
markets and by a significant decrease in benchmark interest
rates globally.
Operational
Risk Management
AIGs Operational Risk Management department (ORM) oversees
AIGs operational risk management practices. The Director
of ORM reports to the CRO. ORM is responsible for establishing
the framework, principles and guidelines of AIGs
operational risk management program. AIG has implemented an
operational risk management framework and a risk and control
self assessment (RCSA) process.
178 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Each business unit is responsible for implementing the
components of the operational risk management program to ensure
that effective operational risk management practices are
utilized throughout AIG. Business units are currently in the
process of enhancing their governance frameworks in order to
perform more robust risk assessments. In addition, business
units involved in the disposition process will be engaged in the
assessment of the specific operational risks attendant to a
separation from AIG.
Insurance
Risk Management
Reinsurance
AIG uses reinsurance programs for its insurance risks as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Facultative agreements to cover large individual exposures;
|
|
|
|
Quota share treaties to cover specific books of business;
|
|
|
|
Excess-of-loss treaties to cover large losses;
|
|
|
|
Excess or surplus automatic treaties to cover individual life
risks in excess of stated per-life retention limits; and
|
|
|
|
Catastrophe treaties to cover specific catastrophes, including
earthquake, windstorm and flood.
|
AIG monitors its exposures to natural catastrophes and takes
corrective actions to limit its exposure with respect to
particular geographic areas, companies, or perils. During the
fourth quarter of 2008, Lexington reduced its exposure to
natural catastrophes by approximately $900 million through
facultative reinsurance placements.
AIGs Reinsurance Security Department (RSD) conducts
periodic detailed assessments of the financial status and
condition of current and potential reinsurers, both foreign and
domestic. The RSD monitors both the nature of the risks ceded to
the reinsurers and the aggregation of total reinsurance
recoverables ceded to reinsurers. Such assessments may include,
but are not limited to, identifying if a reinsurer is
appropriately licensed and has sufficient financial capacity and
evaluating the local economic environment in which a foreign
reinsurer operates.
The RSD reviews the nature of the risks ceded to reinsurers and
the need for credit risk mitigants. For example, in AIGs
treaty reinsurance contracts, AIG frequently includes provisions
that require a reinsurer to post collateral when a referenced
event occurs. Furthermore, AIG limits its unsecured exposure to
reinsurers through the use of credit triggers which include but
are not limited to, insurer financial strength rating
downgrades, declines in statutory surplus below pre-determined
levels, decreases in NAIC risk-based capital (RBC) below certain
levels, or setting maximum limits for reinsurance recoverables.
In addition, AIGs CRC reviews all reinsurer exposures and
credit limits and approves most large reinsurer credit limits
above pre-set limits that represent actual or potential credit
concentrations. AIG believes that no exposure to a single
reinsurer represents an inappropriate concentration of risk to
AIG, nor is AIGs business substantially dependent upon any
single reinsurance contract.
AIG enters into intercompany reinsurance transactions for its
General Insurance and Life Insurance & Retirement
Services operations. AIG enters into these transactions as a
sound and prudent business practice in order to maintain
underwriting control and spread insurance risk among AIGs
various legal entities and to leverage economies of scale with
external reinsurers. When required for statutory recognition,
AIG obtains letters of credit from third-party financial
institutions to collateralize these intercompany transactions.
At December 31, 2008, approximately $5.4 billion of
letters of credit were outstanding to cover intercompany
reinsurance transactions among subsidiaries.
Although reinsurance arrangements do not relieve AIG
subsidiaries from their direct obligations to insureds, an
efficient and effective reinsurance program substantially
mitigates AIGs exposure to potentially significant losses.
AIG continually evaluates the reinsurance markets and the
relative attractiveness of various arrangements for coverage,
including structures such as catastrophe bonds, insurance risk
securitizations, sidecars and similar vehicles.
AIG purchased U.S. property catastrophe coverage of
approximately $1.35 billion and $1.1 billion in 2009
and 2008, respectively, in excess of a per occurrence deductible
of $1.5 billion. In addition, AIG purchased over
$640 million in workers compensation catastrophe
reinsurance that was not purchased in 2008. For Life
Insurance & Retirement Services, AIGs 2008
catastrophe program covers losses of $250 million in excess
of
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 179
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
$200 million for Japan and Taiwan only. No assurance can be
given that AIG will be able to obtain this level of coverage in
2009.
Reinsurance
Recoverable
General reinsurance recoverable assets are comprised of:
|
|
|
|
|
Balances due from reinsurers for indemnity losses and loss
expenses billed to, but not yet collected from, reinsurers (Paid
Losses Recoverable);
|
|
|
|
Ultimate ceded reserves for indemnity losses and expenses,
including reserves for claims reported but not yet paid and
estimates for IBNR (collectively, Ceded Loss Reserves); and
|
|
|
|
Ceded Reserves for Unearned Premiums.
|
At December 31, 2008, reinsurance assets of
$21.9 billion include Paid Losses Recoverable of
$1.3 billion and Ceded Loss Reserves of $16.8 billion,
and $4.2 billion of Ceded Reserves for Unearned Premiums.
The methods used to estimate IBNR and to establish the resulting
ultimate losses involve projecting the frequency and severity of
losses over multiple years and are continually reviewed and
updated by management. Any adjustments are reflected in income
currently. It is AIGs belief that the ceded reserves for
losses and loss expenses at December 31, 2008 reflect the
ultimate losses recoverable. Actual losses may differ from the
reserves currently ceded.
AIG manages the credit risk in its reinsurance relationships by
transacting with reinsurers that it considers financially sound,
and when necessary AIG requires reinsurers to post substantial
collateral in the form of funds, securities
and/or
irrevocable letters of credit. This collateral can be drawn on
for amounts that remain unpaid beyond specified time periods on
an individual reinsurer basis. At December 31, 2008,
approximately 55 percent of the reinsurance assets were
from unauthorized reinsurers. The terms authorized and
unauthorized pertain to regulatory categories, not
creditworthiness. More than 52 percent of these balances
were collateralized, permitting statutory recognition.
Additionally, with the approval of insurance regulators, AIG
posted approximately $1.6 billion of letters of credit
issued by commercial banks and $2.9 billion of trust in
favor of certain General Insurance companies to permit those
companies statutory recognition of balances otherwise
uncollateralized at December 31, 2008. The remaining
45 percent of the reinsurance assets were from authorized
reinsurers. At December 31, 2008, approximately
84 percent of the balances with respect to authorized
reinsurers are from reinsurers rated A (excellent) or better, as
rated by A.M. Best, or A (strong) or better, as rated by
S&P. These ratings are measures of financial strength.
The following table provides information for each reinsurer
representing in excess of five percent of AIGs total
reinsurance assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.M.
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncollateralized
|
|
|
|
S&P
|
|
Best
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
Collateral
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
Rating(a)
|
|
Rating(a)
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Assets, Net
|
|
|
Held(b)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Reinsurer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Swiss Reinsurance Group of Companies
|
|
A+
|
|
A+
|
|
$
|
1,665
|
|
|
|
7.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
380
|
|
|
$
|
1,285
|
|
Berkshire Hathaway Group of Companies
|
|
AAA
|
|
A++
|
|
$
|
1,341
|
|
|
|
5.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
$
|
1,210
|
|
Munich Reinsurance Group of Companies
|
|
AA-
|
|
A+
|
|
$
|
1,274
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
539
|
|
|
$
|
735
|
|
Lloyds Syndicates Lloyds of
London(c)
|
|
A+
|
|
A
|
|
$
|
1,051
|
|
|
|
4.6
|
%
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
923
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The financial strength ratings reflect the ratings of the
various reinsurance subsidiaries of the companies listed as of
February 18, 2009. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Excludes collateral held in excess of applicable treaty
balances. |
|
(c) |
|
Excludes Equitas gross reinsurance assets that are unrated,
which are less than five percent of AIGs general
reinsurance assets. |
180 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
AIG maintains an allowance for estimated unrecoverable
reinsurance of $425 million. At December 31, 2008, AIG
had no significant reinsurance recoverables due from any
individual reinsurer that was financially troubled (i.e.,
liquidated, insolvent, in receivership or otherwise subject to
formal or informal regulatory restriction). In the current
environment of weaker economic conditions and strained financial
markets, certain reinsurers are reporting losses and could be
subject to rating downgrades. AIGs reinsurance recoverable
exposures are primarily to the regulated subsidiaries of such
companies which are subject to minimum regulatory capital
requirements. The RSD, in conjunction with CRM, is reviewing
these developments, is monitoring compliance with credit
triggers that may require the reinsurer to post collateral, and,
as appropriate, will seek to use other means to mitigate any
material risks arising from these developments.
Segment
Risk Management
Other than as described above, AIG manages its business risk
oversight activities through its business segments.
Insurance
Operations
AIGs multiple insurance businesses conducted on a global
basis expose AIG to a wide variety of risks with different time
horizons. These risks are managed throughout the organization,
both centrally and locally, through a number of procedures,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
pre-launch approval of product design, development and
distribution;
|
|
|
|
underwriting approval processes and authorities;
|
|
|
|
exposure limits with ongoing monitoring;
|
|
|
|
modeling and reporting of aggregations and limit concentrations
at multiple levels (policy, line of business, product group,
country, individual/group, correlation and catastrophic risk
events);
|
|
|
|
compliance with financial reporting and capital and solvency
targets;
|
|
|
|
extensive use of reinsurance, both internal and
third-party; and
|
|
|
|
review and establishment of reserves.
|
AIG closely manages insurance risk by overseeing and controlling
the nature and geographic location of the risks in each line of
business underwritten, the terms and conditions of the
underwriting and the premiums charged for taking on the risk.
Concentrations of risk are analyzed using various modeling
techniques and include, but are not limited to, wind, flood,
earthquake, terrorism and accident.
AIG has two major categories of insurance risks as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
General Insurance risks covered include
property, casualty, fidelity/surety, management liability and
mortgage insurance. Risks in the general insurance segment are
managed through aggregations and limitations of concentrations
at multiple levels: policy, line of business, correlation and
catastrophic risk events.
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance & Retirement
Services risks include mortality and morbidity
in the insurance-oriented products and insufficient cash flows
to cover contract liabilities in the retirement savings-oriented
products. Risks are managed through product design, sound
medical underwriting, external traditional reinsurance programs
and external catastrophe reinsurance programs.
|
AIG is a major purchaser of reinsurance for its insurance
operations. The use of reinsurance facilitates insurance risk
management (retention, volatility, concentrations) and capital
planning locally (branch and subsidiary). AIG may purchase
reinsurance on a pooling basis. Pooling of AIGs
reinsurance risks enables AIG to purchase reinsurance more
efficiently at a consolidated level, manage global counterparty
risk and relationships and manage global catastrophe risks, both
for the General Insurance and Life Insurance &
Retirement Services businesses.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 181
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
General
Insurance
In General Insurance, underwriting risks are managed through the
application approval process, exposure limitations as well as
through exclusions, coverage limits and reinsurance. The risks
covered by AIG are managed through limits on delegated
underwriting authority, the use of sound underwriting practices,
pricing procedures and the use of actuarial analysis as part of
the determination of overall adequacy of provisions for
insurance contract liabilities.
A primary goal of AIG in managing its General Insurance
operations is to achieve an underwriting profit. To achieve this
goal, AIG must be disciplined in its risk selection, and
premiums must be adequate and terms and conditions appropriate
to cover the risk accepted.
Catastrophe
Exposures
The nature of AIGs business exposes it to various
catastrophic events in which multiple losses across multiple
lines of business can occur in any calendar year. In order to
control this exposure, AIG uses a combination of techniques,
including setting aggregate limits in key business units,
monitoring and modeling accumulated exposures, and purchasing
catastrophe reinsurance to supplement its other reinsurance
protections.
Natural disasters, such as hurricanes, earthquakes and other
catastrophes have the potential to adversely affect AIGs
operating results. Other risks, such as an outbreak of a
pandemic disease, such as the Avian Influenza A Virus (H5N1),
could adversely affect AIGs business and operating results
to an extent that may be only partially offset by reinsurance
programs.
AIG evaluates catastrophic events and assesses the probability
of occurrence and magnitude of catastrophic events through the
use of industry recognized models, among other techniques. AIG
updates these models by periodically monitoring the exposure
risks of AIGs worldwide General Insurance operations and
adjusting such models accordingly. Following is an overview of
modeled losses associated with the more significant natural
perils, which includes exposures for Commercial Insurance Group,
Personal Lines, Foreign General, HSB and 21st Century
Insurance (21st Century). Transatlantic utilizes a
different model, and its results are presented separately below.
Significant Life and accident and health (A&H) exposures
have been added to these results as well. The modeled results
assume that all reinsurers fulfill their obligations to AIG in
accordance with their terms.
It is important to recognize that there is no standard
methodology to project the possible losses from total property
and workers compensation exposures. Further, there are no
industry standard assumptions to be utilized in projecting these
losses. The use of different methodologies and assumptions could
materially change the projected losses. Therefore, these modeled
losses may not be comparable to estimates made by other
companies. These estimates are inherently uncertain and may not
reflect AIGs maximum exposures to these events. It is
highly likely that AIGs losses will vary, perhaps
significantly, from these estimates.
The modeled results provided in the table below were based on
the aggregate exceedence probability (AEP) losses, which
represent total property, workers compensation, life, and
A&H losses that may occur in any single year from one or
more natural events. The Life and A&H data include
exposures for United States, Japan and Taiwan earthquakes. These
represent the largest share of Life and A&H exposures to
earthquakes. A&H losses were modeled using April 2008 data,
and Life losses were modeled using May 2008 data for Japan and
Taiwan and February 2007 data for the United States. The
property exposures for AIGs largest property exposures,
Lexington commercial lines and Private Client Group, were
modeled with data as of September 2008, and June 2008 data was
used for most other divisions. All reinsurance program
structures, including both domestic and international
structures, reflect the reinsurance programs in place as of
January 31, 2009. The values provided were based on
100-year
return period losses, which have a one percent likelihood of
being exceeded in any single year. Thus, the model projects that
there is a one percent probability that AIG could incur in any
year losses in excess of the
182 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
modeled amounts for these perils. Losses include loss adjustment
expenses and the net values include reinstatement premiums.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of 2009
|
|
|
Net After
|
|
|
% of Consolidated
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
Income Tax
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Natural Peril:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earthquake
|
|
$
|
7,905
|
|
|
$
|
4,480
|
|
|
$
|
2,912
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
%
|
Tropical Cyclone*
|
|
$
|
7,598
|
|
|
$
|
4,518
|
|
|
$
|
2,937
|
|
|
|
5.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes hurricanes, typhoons and European Windstorms. |
Gross earthquake and tropical cyclone modeled losses increased
$2.3 billion and $1.8 billion, respectively, compared
to 2007 while net losses increased $1.1 billion and
$1.1 billion, respectively, compared to 2007. These
increases are primarily due to exposure growth and the inclusion
of Ascot.
In addition to the return period loss, AIG evaluates potential
single event earthquake and hurricane losses that may be
incurred. The single events utilized are a subset of potential
events identified and utilized by Lloyds (see
Lloyds Realistic Disaster Scenarios, Scenario
Specifications, April 2006) and referred to as
Realistic Disaster Scenarios (RDSs). The purpose of this
analysis is to utilize these RDSs to provide a reference frame
and place into context the model results. However, it is
important to note that the specific events used for this
analysis do not necessarily represent the worst case loss that
AIG could incur from this type of an event in these regions. The
losses associated with the RDSs are included in the following
table.
Single-event modeled property and workers compensation
losses to AIGs worldwide portfolio of risk for key
geographic areas are set forth below. Gross values represent
AIGs liability after the application of policy limits and
deductibles, and net values represent losses after reinsurance
is applied; the net losses also include reinsurance
reinstatement premiums. Both gross and net losses include loss
adjustment expenses.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of 2009
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Natural Peril:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
San Francisco Earthquake
|
|
$
|
8,617
|
|
|
$
|
4,966
|
|
Miami Hurricane
|
|
$
|
7,912
|
|
|
$
|
4,362
|
|
Northeast Hurricane
|
|
$
|
6,128
|
|
|
$
|
3,857
|
|
Los Angeles Earthquake
|
|
$
|
7,646
|
|
|
$
|
4,491
|
|
Gulf Coast Hurricane
|
|
$
|
5,410
|
|
|
$
|
3,065
|
|
Japanese Earthquake
|
|
$
|
747
|
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
European Windstorm
|
|
$
|
418
|
|
|
$
|
152
|
|
Japanese Typhoon
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG also monitors key international property risks utilizing
modeled statistical return period losses. Based on these
simulations, the
100-year
return period loss for Japanese Earthquake is $335 million
gross and $180 million net; the
100-year
return period loss for European Windstorm is $577 million
gross and $186 million net; and the
100-year
return period loss for Japanese Typhoon is $504 million
gross and $172 million net.
The losses provided above do not include Transatlantic. The one
in 100-year
AEP amounts for AIGs share (59 percent) of
Transatlantic are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net of 2009
|
|
|
Net After
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
Income Tax
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Natural Peril:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIGs Share of Transatlantic Earthquake
|
|
$
|
452
|
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
AIGs Share of Transatlantic Tropical Cyclone
|
|
$
|
618
|
|
|
$
|
577
|
|
|
$
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 183
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
ACTUAL RESULTS IN ANY PERIOD ARE LIKELY TO VARY, PERHAPS
MATERIALLY, FROM THE MODELED SCENARIOS, AND THE OCCURRENCE OF
ONE OR MORE SEVERE EVENTS COULD HAVE A MATERIAL ADVERSE EFFECT
ON AIGS FINANCIAL CONDITION, RESULTS OF OPERATIONS AND
LIQUIDITY.
Terrorism
Exposure to loss from terrorist attack is controlled by limiting
the aggregate accumulation of workers compensation and
property insurance that is underwritten within defined target
locations. Modeling is used to provide projections of probable
maximum loss by target location based upon the actual exposures
of AIG policyholders.
Terrorism risk is monitored to manage AIGs exposure. AIG
shares its exposures to terrorism risks under the Terrorism Risk
Insurance Act (TRIA). During 2008, AIGs deductible under
TRIA was approximately $4.2 billion, with a 15 percent
share of certified terrorism losses in excess of the deductible.
As of January 1, 2009, the deductible decreased to
approximately $3.8 billion, with a 15 percent share of
certified terrorism losses in excess of the deductible.
Life
Insurance & Retirement Services
In Life Insurance & Retirement Services, the primary
risks are the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Pricing risk, which represents the potential exposure to loss
resulting from actual policy experience emerging adversely in
comparison to the assumptions made in product pricing associated
with mortality, morbidity, termination and expenses; and
|
|
|
|
Investment risk, which represents the exposure to loss resulting
from the cash flows from the invested assets being less than
cash flows required to meet the obligations of the expected
policy and contract liabilities and the necessary return on
investments.
|
AIG businesses manage these risks through product design,
exposure limitations and the active management of the
asset-liability relationship in their operations. The emergence
of significant adverse experience would require an adjustment to
DAC and benefit reserves that could have a material adverse
effect on AIGs consolidated results of operations for a
particular period. For a further discussion of this risk, see
Item 1A. Risk Factors Adjustments to Life
Insurance & Retirement Services Deferred Policy
Acquisition Costs.
AIGs Foreign Life Insurance & Retirement
Services companies generally limit their maximum underwriting
exposure on life insurance of a single life to approximately
$5 million of coverage in certain circumstances. AIGs
Domestic Life Insurance and Domestic Retirement Services
companies limit their maximum underwriting exposure on life
insurance of a single life to $15 million of coverage in
certain circumstances by using yearly renewable term
reinsurance. In Life Insurance & Retirement Services,
the reinsurance programs provide risk mitigation per life for
individual and group covers and for catastrophic risk events.
Pandemic
Influenza
The potential for a pandemic influenza outbreak has received
much attention. While outbreaks of the Avian Flu continue to
occur among poultry or wild birds in a number of countries in
Asia, Europe, including the U.K., and Africa, transmission to
humans has been rare to date. If the virus mutates to a form
that can be transmitted from human to human, it has the
potential to spread rapidly worldwide. If such an outbreak were
to take place, early quarantine and vaccination could be
critical to containment.
The contagion and mortality rates of any mutated H5N1 virus that
can be transmitted from human to human are highly speculative.
AIG continues to monitor the developing facts. A significant
global outbreak could have a material adverse effect on Life
Insurance & Retirement Services operating results and
liquidity from increased mortality and morbidity rates.
Utilizing a scenario-based approach, AIG has analyzed its
insurance risk associated with this peril. For a severe event,
considered to be a recurrence of the 1918 Pandemic Flu, the
analysis indicates AIG could incur a pre-tax loss of
approximately $6.2 billion if this event were to recur. For
a mild event, considered to be a recurrence of the 1968
184 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Pandemic Flu, the analysis indicates AIG could incur a pre-tax
loss of approximately $0.6 billion if this event were to
recur. The analyses were based on 2007 policy data representing
approximately 95 percent of AIGs individual life,
group life and credit life books of business, net of reinsurance
at that point in time. This estimate does not include claims
that could be made under other policies, such as business
interruption or general liability policies, and does not reflect
estimates for losses resulting from disruption of AIGs own
business operations or asset losses that may arise out of such a
pandemic. The model used to generate these estimates has been
developed only recently. The reasonableness of the model and its
underlying assumptions cannot readily be verified by reference
to comparable historical events. As a result, AIGs actual
losses from a pandemic influenza outbreak are likely to vary
significantly from those predicted by the model.
Financial
Services
AIGs Financial Services subsidiaries engage in diversified
activities including aircraft leasing, capital markets, consumer
finance and insurance premium finance. Together, the Aircraft
Leasing, Capital Markets and Consumer Finance operations
generate the majority of the revenues produced by the Financial
Services operations. A.I. Credit also contributes to Financial
Services income principally by providing insurance premium
financing for both AIGs policyholders and those of other
insurers.
Capital
Markets
Capital Markets represents the operations of AIGFP, which
engaged as principal in a wide variety of financial
transactions, including standard and customized financial
products involving commodities, credit, currencies, energy,
equities and interest rates. AIGFP also invested in a
diversified portfolio of securities and principal investments
and engaged in borrowing activities that involve issuing
standard and structured notes and other securities and entering
into GIAs. Given the extreme market conditions experienced in
2008, downgrades of AIGs credit ratings by the rating
agencies, as well as because of AIGs intent to refocus on
its core businesses, AIGFP has begun to unwind its businesses
and portfolios.
The senior management of AIG defines the policies and
establishes general operating parameters for Capital Markets
operations. AIGs senior management has established various
oversight committees to monitor on an ongoing basis the various
financial market, operational and credit risk attendant to the
Capital Markets operations. The senior management of AIGFP
reports the results of its operations to and reviews future
strategies with AIGs senior management.
AIGFP actively manages its exposures to limit potential economic
losses, and in doing so, AIGFP must continually manage a variety
of exposures including credit, market, liquidity, operational
and legal risks.
Derivative
Transactions
A counterparty may default on any obligation to AIG, including a
derivative contract. Credit risk is a consequence of extending
credit
and/or
carrying trading and investment positions. Credit risk exists
for a derivative contract when that contract has a positive fair
value to AIG. The maximum potential exposure will increase or
decrease during the life of the derivative commitments as a
function of maturity and market conditions. To help manage this
risk, AIGFPs credit department operates within the
guidelines set by the CRC. Transactions which fall outside these
pre-established guidelines require the specific approval of the
CRC. It is also AIGs policy to establish reserves for
potential credit impairment when necessary.
In addition, AIGFP utilizes various credit enhancements,
including letters of credit, guarantees, collateral, credit
triggers, credit derivatives and margin agreements to reduce the
credit risk relating to its outstanding financial derivative
transactions. AIGFP requires credit enhancements in connection
with specific transactions based on, among other things, the
creditworthiness of the counterparties, and the
transactions size and maturity. Furthermore, AIGFP
generally seeks to enter into agreements that have the benefit
of set-off and close-out netting provisions. These provisions
provide that, in the case of an early termination of a
transaction, AIGFP can set off its receivables from a
counterparty against its payables to the same counterparty
arising out of all covered transactions. As a result, where a
legally enforceable netting agreement exists, the fair value of
the transaction with the counterparty represents the net sum of
estimated fair values. The fair value of AIGFPs interest
rate, currency, commodity and equity swaps, options, swaptions,
and forward commitments, futures, and forward contracts
approximated
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 185
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
$16.0 billion at December 31, 2008 and
$17.1 billion at December 31, 2007. Where applicable,
these amounts have been determined in accordance with the
respective master netting agreements.
AIGFP evaluates the counterparty credit quality by reference to
ratings from rating agencies or, where such ratings are not
available, by internal analysis consistent with the risk rating
policies of the CRC. In addition, AIGFPs credit approval
process involves pre-set counterparty and country credit
exposure limits subject to approval by the CRC and, for
particularly credit-intensive transactions, requires approval
from the CRC. AIG estimates that the average credit rating of
Capital Markets derivatives counterparties, measured by
reference to the fair value of its derivative portfolio as a
whole, is equivalent to the AA rating category.
The fair value of Capital Markets derivatives portfolios by
counterparty credit rating was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Rating:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AAA
|
|
$
|
3,278
|
|
|
$
|
5,069
|
|
AA
|
|
|
4,963
|
|
|
|
5,166
|
|
A
|
|
|
5,815
|
|
|
|
4,796
|
|
BBB
|
|
|
1,694
|
|
|
|
1,801
|
|
Below investment grade
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
|
302
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
16,001
|
|
|
$
|
17,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Critical Accounting Estimates and Note 10 for
additional discussion related to derivative transactions.
Capital
Markets Trading VaR
AIGFP attempts to minimize risk in benchmark interest rates,
equities, commodities and foreign exchange. Market exposures in
option-implied volatilities, correlations and basis risks are
also minimized over time.
AIGFPs minimal reliance on market risk-driven revenue is
reflected in its VaR. AIGFPs VaR calculation is based on
the interest rate, equity, commodity and foreign exchange risk
arising from its portfolio. Credit-related factors, such as
credit spreads or credit default, are not included in
AIGFPs VaR calculation. Because the market risk with
respect to securities available for sale, at market, is
substantially hedged, segregation of the financial instruments
into trading and other than trading was not considered
necessary. AIGFP operates under established market risk limits
based upon this VaR calculation. In addition, AIGFP back-tests
its VaR.
In the calculation of VaR for AIGFP, AIG uses the historical
simulation methodology based on estimated changes to the value
of all transactions under explicit changes in market rates and
prices within a specific historical time period. AIGFP attempts
to secure reliable and independent current market prices, such
as published exchange prices, external subscription services,
such as Bloomberg or Reuters, or third-party or broker quotes.
When such prices are not available, AIGFP uses an internal
methodology that includes extrapolation from observable and
verifiable prices nearest to the dates of the transactions.
Historically, actual results have not deviated from these models
in any material respect.
AIGFP reports its VaR level using a 95 percent confidence
level and a
one-day
holding period, facilitating risk comparison with AIGFPs
trading peers and reflecting the fact that market risks can be
actively assumed and offset in AIGFPs trading portfolio.
186 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
The following table presents the year-end, average, high, and
low VaRs on a diversified basis and of each component of market
risk for Capital Markets operations. The diversified VaR is
usually smaller than the sum of its components due to
correlation effects.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year Ended
|
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
As of
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Total AIG trading market risk:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diversified
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
Interest rate
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Currency
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Commodity
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Valuation of Level 3 Assets and Liabilities for a
comprehensive discussion of AIGFPs super senior credit
default swap portfolio.
Aircraft
Leasing
AIGs Aircraft Leasing operations represent the operations
of ILFC, which generates its revenues primarily from leasing new
and used commercial jet aircraft to foreign and domestic
airlines. Revenues also result from the re-marketing of
commercial jet aircraft for ILFCs own account and
re-marketing and fleet management services for airlines and
financial institutions. Risks inherent in this business, which
are managed at the business unit level, include the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the risk that there will be no market for the aircraft acquired;
|
|
|
|
the risk that aircraft cannot be placed with lessees;
|
|
|
|
the risk of non-performance by lessees; and
|
|
|
|
the risk that aircraft and related assets cannot be disposed of
at the time and in a manner desired.
|
The airline industry is sensitive to changes in economic
conditions and is cyclical and highly competitive. Airlines and
related companies may be affected by political or economic
instability, terrorist activities, changes in national policy,
competitive pressures on certain air carriers, fuel prices and
shortages, labor stoppages, insurance costs, recessions, world
health issues and other political or economic events adversely
affecting world or regional trading markets.
ILFCs revenues and operating income may be adversely
affected by the volatile competitive environment in which its
customers operate. ILFC is exposed to operating loss and
liquidity strain through non-performance of aircraft lessees,
through owning aircraft which it is unable to sell or re-lease
at acceptable rates at lease expiration, and, in part, through
committing to purchase aircraft which it is unable to lease.
To date ILFC manages the risk of nonperformance by its lessees
with security deposit requirements, repossession rights,
overhaul requirements and close monitoring of industry
conditions through its marketing force. More than
90 percent of ILFCs fleet is leased to
non-U.S. carriers,
and the fleet, comprised of the most efficient aircraft in the
airline industry, continues to be in high demand from such
carriers.
Management formally reviews regularly, and no less frequently
than quarterly, issues affecting ILFCs fleet, including
events and circumstances that may cause impairment of aircraft
values. Management evaluates aircraft in the fleet as necessary
based on these events and circumstances in accordance with
FAS 144. ILFC has not recognized any impairment related to
its fleet in 2008, 2007 or 2006. ILFC has been able to re-lease
the aircraft without diminution in lease rates that would result
in an impairment under FAS 144.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 187
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Consumer
Finance
AIGs Consumer Finance operations in North America are
principally conducted through AGF. AGF derives most of its
revenues from finance charges assessed on real estate loans,
secured and unsecured non-real estate loans and retail sales
finance receivables. In the second quarter of 2008, AGF ceased
its wholesale origination activities (originations through
mortgage brokers).
AIGs foreign consumer finance operations are principally
conducted through AIGCFG. AIGCFG operates primarily in emerging
and developing markets. AIGCFG has operations in Argentina,
China, Brazil, Hong Kong, Mexico, the Philippines, Poland,
Taiwan, Thailand, India and Colombia. AIGCFG is currently
considering the sale of all or a portion of its operations.
Many of AGFs borrowers are non-prime or subprime. The real
estate loans are comprised principally of first-lien mortgages
on residential real estate generally having a maximum term of
360 months, and are considered non-conforming. The real
estate loans are principally closed-end accounts and fixed rate
products. AGF does not offer mortgage products with borrower
payment options that allow for negative amortization of the
principal balance. The majority of AGFs non-real estate
loans are secured by consumer goods, automobiles or other
personal property. Both secured and unsecured non-real estate
loans and retail sales finance receivables generally have a
maximum term of 60 months.
Current economic conditions, such as interest rate and
employment levels, can have a direct effect on the
borrowers ability to repay these loans. AGF manages the
credit risk inherent in its portfolio by using credit scoring
models at the time of credit applications, established
underwriting criteria and review procedures. AGF systematically
monitors the quality of the finance receivables portfolio and
determines the appropriate level of the allowance for losses
through its Credit Strategy and Policy Committee. This Committee
bases its conclusions on quantitative analyses, qualitative
factors, current economic conditions and trends, and each
Committee members experience in the consumer finance
industry.
The overall credit quality of AGFs finance receivable
portfolio deteriorated during 2008 due to negative economic
fundamentals and the aging of the real estate loan portfolio.
Based upon anticipated difficult economic conditions for the
U.S. consumer, AGF expects credit quality to remain under
pressure in the remainder of 2009.
At December 31, 2008, the
60-day
delinquency rate for the entire portfolio increased by
215 basis points to 4.99 percent compared to
December 31, 2007, while the
60-day
delinquency rate for real estate loans increased by
247 basis points to 5.11 percent. For 2008, AGFs
net charge-off rate increased to 2.08 percent compared to
1.16 percent in 2007.
AGFs allowance for finance receivable losses as a
percentage of outstanding receivables was 4.61 percent at
December 31, 2008 compared to 2.36 percent at
December 31, 2007.
AIGCFG monitors the quality of its finance receivable portfolio
and determines the appropriate level of the allowance for losses
through several internal committees. These committees base their
conclusions on quantitative analysis, qualitative factors,
current economic conditions and trends, political and regulatory
implications, competition and the judgment of the
committees members.
AIGs Consumer Finance operations are exposed to credit
risk and risk of loss resulting from adverse fluctuations in
interest rates and payment defaults. Credit loss exposure is
managed through a combination of underwriting controls, mix of
finance receivables, collateral and collection efficiency. Large
product programs and exposures to certain high risk products are
subject to CRC approval.
Over half of the finance receivables are real estate loans which
are collateralized by the related properties. With respect to
credit losses, the allowance for losses is maintained at a level
considered adequate to absorb anticipated credit losses existing
in that portfolio as of the balance sheet date.
Asset
Management
AIGs Asset Management operations are exposed to various
forms of credit, market and operational risks. Asset Management
complies with AIGs corporate risk management guidelines
and framework and is subject to
188 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
periodic reviews by the CRC. In addition, transactions are
referred to the Asset Management investment committees for
approval of investment decisions.
The majority of the credit and market risk exposures within
Asset Management results from the Spread-Based Investment
business and the investment activities of AIG Global Real Estate
and to a lesser extent, assets originally acquired for warehouse
purposes.
In the Spread-Based Investment business, the primary risk is
investment risk, which represents the exposure to loss resulting
from the cash flows from the invested assets being less than the
cash flows required to meet the obligations of the liabilities
and the necessary return on investments. Credit risk is also a
significant component of the investment strategy for these
businesses. Market risk is taken in the form of duration and
convexity risk. While AIG generally maintains a matched
asset-liability relationship, it may occasionally determine that
it is economically advantageous to be in an unmatched duration
position. The risks in the Spread-Based Investment business are
managed through exposure limitations, active management of the
investment portfolios and close oversight of the asset-liability
relationship.
AIG Global Real Estate is exposed to the general conditions in
global real estate markets and the credit markets. Such exposure
can subject Asset Management to delays in real estate property
development and sales, additional carrying costs and in turn
affect operating results within the segment. Also negatively
affecting current market conditions is the lack of available
funding for development, repositioning and refinancing. These
risks are mitigated through the underwriting process,
transaction and contract terms and conditions and portfolio
diversification by type of project, sponsor, real estate market
and country. AIGs exposure to real estate investments is
monitored on an ongoing basis by the Asset Management Real
Estate Investment Committee.
Asset Management is also exposed to market and liquidity risk
with respect to the warehoused investing activities of AIG
Investments. During the warehousing period, AIG bears the cost
and risks associated with carrying these investments and may
consolidate them on its balance sheet and records the operating
results until the investments are transferred, sold or otherwise
divested. Changes in market conditions may negatively affect the
fair value of these warehoused investments. As a result of
AIGs restructuring initiatives, AIG Investments
intended launch of new products and funds for which these
warehouse investments were targeted have been indefinitely
postponed. Accordingly, AIG will retain all current warehouse
investments with a net asset value of $1.1 billion at
December 31, 2008 as permanent balance sheet investments
until such time that they can be divested. Further, certain of
these warehoused investments include unfunded investment
commitments of $720 million at December 31, 2008 which
are to be funded over the next three to five years.
Recent
Accounting Standards
Accounting
Changes
In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS No. 157,
Fair Value Measurements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities.
In April 2007, the FASB issued FSP
FIN 39-1,
which modifies FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 39,
Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts.
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the
Market for That Asset Is Not Active.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8, Disclosures by Public Entities
(Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests
in Variable Interest Entities.
In January 2009, the FASB issued FSP
EITF 99-20-1,
Amendments to the Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue
No. 99-20
(FSP
EITF 99-20-1).
Future
Application of Accounting Standards
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 189
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS No. 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an amendment of ARB No. 51.
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. FAS 140-3,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and
Repurchase Financing Transactions.
In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS 161, Disclosures
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133.
In May 2008, the FASB issued FAS 162, The Hierarchy
of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.
In June 2008, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the
EITF on Issue
No. 07-5,
Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) is
Indexed to an Entitys Own Stock.
In September 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 133-1
and
FIN 45-4,
Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain
Guarantees: An amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB
Interpretation No. 45.
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1,
Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit
Plan Assets.
For further discussion of these recent accounting standards and
their application to AIG, see Note 1(hh) to the
Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Included in Item 7. Managements Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
|
|
Item 8.
|
Financial
Statements and Supplementary Data
|
American
International Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries Index to Financial
Statements and Schedules
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
|
|
|
191
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31,
2008 and 2007
|
|
|
192
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss) for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
194
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders
Equity for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007
and 2006
|
|
|
195
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
197
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
(Loss) for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and
2006
|
|
|
199
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
201
|
|
Schedules:
|
|
|
|
|
I Summary of Investments
Other Than Investments in Related Parties at December 31,
2008
|
|
|
338
|
|
II Condensed Financial Information of
Registrant at December 31, 2008 and 2007 and for the years
ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
339
|
|
III Supplementary Insurance
Information at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and for the
years then ended
|
|
|
343
|
|
IV Reinsurance at December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006 and for the years then ended
|
|
|
344
|
|
V Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and for the years
then ended
|
|
|
345
|
|
190 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of American
International Group, Inc.:
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements listed in
the accompanying index present fairly, in all material respects,
the financial position of American International Group, Inc. and
its subsidiaries (AIG) at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and
the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of
the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008 in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the
financial statement schedules listed in the accompanying index
present fairly, in all material respects, the information set
forth therein when read in conjunction with the related
consolidated financial statements. Also in our opinion, AIG
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on
criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). AIGs
management is responsible for these financial statements and
financial statement schedules, for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial
reporting, included in Managements Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A.
Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial
statements, on the financial statement schedules, and on
AIGs internal control over financial reporting based on
our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance
with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight
Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and
perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements are free of material misstatement and
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was
maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial
statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence
supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the
overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal
control over financial reporting included obtaining an
understanding of internal control over financial reporting,
assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing
and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also
included performing such other procedures as we considered
necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial
statements, as of January 1, 2008, AIG adopted a new
framework for measuring fair value and elected an option to
report selected financial assets and liabilities at fair value.
Also, AIG changed the manner in which it accounts for internal
replacements of certain insurance and investment contracts,
uncertainty in income taxes, and changes or projected changes in
the timing of cash flows relating to income taxes generated by
leveraged lease transactions on January 1, 2007, and
certain employee benefit plans as of December 31, 2006.
As discussed in Notes 1 and 23 to the consolidated
financial statements, AIG has received substantial financial
support from the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (NY Fed)
and the United States Department of Treasury (US Treasury).
AIG is dependent upon the continued financial support of the
NY Fed and US Treasury.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that
transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of
financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the
company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
New York, New York
March 2, 2009
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 191
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds available for sale, at fair value (amortized cost:
2008 $373,600; 2007 $433,327)
|
|
$
|
363,042
|
|
|
$
|
437,675
|
|
Bonds held to maturity, at amortized cost (fair value:
2008 $0; 2007 $22,157)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,581
|
|
Bond trading securities, at fair value
|
|
|
37,248
|
|
|
|
10,258
|
|
Securities lending invested collateral, at fair value (cost:
2008 $3,906; 2007 $80,641)
|
|
|
3,844
|
|
|
|
75,662
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common and preferred stocks available for sale, at fair value
(cost: 2008 $8,381; 2007 $15,188)
|
|
|
8,808
|
|
|
|
20,272
|
|
Common and preferred stocks trading, at fair value
|
|
|
12,335
|
|
|
|
25,297
|
|
Mortgage and other loans receivable, net of allowance (amount
measured at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 $131)
|
|
|
34,687
|
|
|
|
33,727
|
|
Finance receivables, net of allowance
|
|
|
30,949
|
|
|
|
31,234
|
|
Flight equipment primarily under operating leases, net of
accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
43,395
|
|
|
|
41,984
|
|
Other invested assets (amount measured at fair value:
2008 $19,196; 2007 $20,827)
|
|
|
51,978
|
|
|
|
59,477
|
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell, at fair value
in 2008
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
|
|
20,950
|
|
Short-term investments (amount measured at fair value:
2008 $19,316)
|
|
|
46,666
|
|
|
|
51,351
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
|
636,912
|
|
|
|
829,468
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
8,642
|
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
Investment income due and accrued
|
|
|
5,999
|
|
|
|
6,587
|
|
Premiums and insurance balances receivable, net of allowance
|
|
|
17,330
|
|
|
|
18,395
|
|
Reinsurance assets, net of allowance
|
|
|
23,495
|
|
|
|
23,103
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
Current and deferred income taxes
|
|
|
11,734
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
45,782
|
|
|
|
43,914
|
|
Real estate and other fixed assets, net of accumulated
depreciation
|
|
|
5,566
|
|
|
|
5,518
|
|
Unrealized gain on swaps, options and forward transactions, at
fair value
|
|
|
13,773
|
|
|
|
14,104
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
6,952
|
|
|
|
9,414
|
|
Other assets, including prepaid commitment asset of $15,458 in
2008 (amount measured at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 $369; 2007 $4,152)
|
|
|
31,190
|
|
|
|
16,218
|
|
Separate account assets, at fair value
|
|
|
51,142
|
|
|
|
78,684
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
860,418
|
|
|
$
|
1,048,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
192 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Balance Sheet (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except share data)
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
Liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense
|
|
$
|
89,258
|
|
|
$
|
85,500
|
|
Unearned premiums
|
|
|
25,735
|
|
|
|
27,703
|
|
Future policy benefits for life and accident and health
insurance contracts
|
|
|
142,334
|
|
|
|
136,387
|
|
Policyholder contract deposits (amount measured at fair value:
2008 $5,458; 2007 $295)
|
|
|
226,700
|
|
|
|
258,459
|
|
Other policyholder funds
|
|
|
13,240
|
|
|
|
12,599
|
|
Commissions, expenses and taxes payable
|
|
|
5,436
|
|
|
|
6,310
|
|
Insurance balances payable
|
|
|
3,668
|
|
|
|
4,878
|
|
Funds held by companies under reinsurance treaties
|
|
|
2,133
|
|
|
|
2,501
|
|
Current and deferred income taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,823
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase (amount measured
at fair value: 2008 $4,508)
|
|
|
5,262
|
|
|
|
8,331
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
6,445
|
|
Securities and spot commodities sold but not yet purchased, at
fair value
|
|
|
2,693
|
|
|
|
4,709
|
|
Unrealized loss on swaps, options and forward transactions, at
fair value
|
|
|
6,238
|
|
|
|
18,031
|
|
Trust deposits and deposits due to banks and other depositors
(amount measured at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008 $30)
|
|
|
4,498
|
|
|
|
4,903
|
|
Commercial paper and extendible commercial notes
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
13,114
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank of New York commercial paper funding
facility
|
|
|
15,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank of New York credit facility
|
|
|
40,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term debt (amount measured at fair value:
2008 $16,595)
|
|
|
137,054
|
|
|
|
162,935
|
|
Securities lending payable
|
|
|
2,879
|
|
|
|
81,965
|
|
Other liabilities (amount measured at fair value:
2008 $1,355; 2007 $3,262)
|
|
|
22,296
|
|
|
|
24,761
|
|
Separate account liabilities
|
|
|
51,142
|
|
|
|
78,684
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
10,016
|
|
|
|
10,522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
807,708
|
|
|
|
952,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments, contingencies and guarantees (See Note 14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock, Series D; liquidation preference of
$10,000 per share; issued: 2008 4,000,000
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $2.50 par value; 5,000,000,000 shares
authorized; shares issued 2008 2,948,038,001;
2007 2,751,327,476
|
|
|
7,370
|
|
|
|
6,878
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
72,466
|
|
|
|
2,848
|
|
Payments advanced to purchase shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(912
|
)
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
|
|
(12,368
|
)
|
|
|
89,029
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(6,328
|
)
|
|
|
4,643
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost; 2008 258,368,924;
2007 221,743,421 shares of common stock
(including 119,283,433 and 119,293,487 shares,
respectively, held by subsidiaries)
|
|
|
(8,450
|
)
|
|
|
(6,685
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
52,710
|
|
|
|
95,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
860,418
|
|
|
$
|
1,048,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 193
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statement of Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and other considerations
|
|
$
|
83,505
|
|
|
$
|
79,302
|
|
|
$
|
74,213
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
|
12,222
|
|
|
|
28,619
|
|
|
|
26,070
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses)
|
|
|
(55,484
|
)
|
|
|
(3,592
|
)
|
|
|
106
|
|
Unrealized market valuation losses on AIGFP super senior credit
default swap portfolio
|
|
|
(28,602
|
)
|
|
|
(11,472
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (loss)
|
|
|
(537
|
)
|
|
|
17,207
|
|
|
|
12,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
11,104
|
|
|
|
110,064
|
|
|
|
113,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits, claims and expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policyholder benefits and claims incurred
|
|
|
63,299
|
|
|
|
66,115
|
|
|
|
60,287
|
|
Policy acquisition and other insurance expenses
|
|
|
27,565
|
|
|
|
20,396
|
|
|
|
19,413
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
17,007
|
|
|
|
4,751
|
|
|
|
3,657
|
|
Restructuring expenses and related asset impairment and other
expenses
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
11,236
|
|
|
|
9,859
|
|
|
|
8,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total benefits, claims and expenses
|
|
|
119,865
|
|
|
|
101,121
|
|
|
|
91,700
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before income tax expense (benefit), minority
interest and cumulative effect of change in accounting
principles
|
|
|
(108,761
|
)
|
|
|
8,943
|
|
|
|
21,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
1,706
|
|
|
|
3,219
|
|
|
|
5,489
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(10,080
|
)
|
|
|
(1,764
|
)
|
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(8,374
|
)
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
|
|
6,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before minority interest and cumulative effect
of change in accounting principles
|
|
|
(100,387
|
)
|
|
|
7,488
|
|
|
|
15,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
|
|
(1,288
|
)
|
|
|
(1,136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in
accounting principles
|
|
|
(99,289
|
)
|
|
|
6,200
|
|
|
|
14,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of
tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(99,289
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,200
|
|
|
$
|
14,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principles
|
|
$
|
(37.84
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
5.38
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(37.84
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
5.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principles
|
|
$
|
(37.84
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.39
|
|
|
$
|
5.35
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(37.84
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.39
|
|
|
$
|
5.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
2,634
|
|
|
|
2,585
|
|
|
|
2,608
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
2,634
|
|
|
|
2,598
|
|
|
|
2,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
194 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statement of Shareholders Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Amounts
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
Preferred Stock, Series D:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuances
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,000,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
6,878
|
|
|
|
6,878
|
|
|
|
6,878
|
|
|
|
2,751,327,476
|
|
|
|
2,751,327,476
|
|
|
|
2,751,327,476
|
|
Issuances
|
|
|
492
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
196,710,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
|
7,370
|
|
|
|
6,878
|
|
|
|
6,878
|
|
|
|
2,948,038,001
|
|
|
|
2,751,327,476
|
|
|
|
2,751,327,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
2,848
|
|
|
|
2,590
|
|
|
|
2,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of proceeds over par value of common stock issued
|
|
|
6,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of proceeds over par value of preferred stock issued
|
|
|
39,889
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of warrants
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Present value of future contract adjustment payments related to
issuance of equity units
|
|
|
(431
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration received for Series C preferred stock not yet
issued
|
|
|
23,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excess of cost over proceeds of common stock issued under stock
plans
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
(128
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
|
72,466
|
|
|
|
2,848
|
|
|
|
2,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments advanced to purchase shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
(912
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments advanced
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
(6,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares purchased
|
|
|
1,912
|
|
|
|
5,088
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(912
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
89,029
|
|
|
|
84,996
|
|
|
|
72,330
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of tax
|
|
|
(1,003
|
)
|
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
88,026
|
|
|
|
84,793
|
|
|
|
72,638
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
(99,289
|
)
|
|
|
6,200
|
|
|
|
14,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends to common shareholders ($0.42, $0.77 and $0.65 per
share, respectively)
|
|
|
(1,105
|
)
|
|
|
(1,964
|
)
|
|
|
(1,690
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
|
(12,368
|
)
|
|
|
89,029
|
|
|
|
84,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments, net of
tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
4,375
|
|
|
|
10,083
|
|
|
|
8,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of tax
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
4,270
|
|
|
|
10,083
|
|
|
|
8,348
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of investments, net of
reclassification adjustments
|
|
|
(13,670
|
)
|
|
|
(8,046
|
)
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
4,948
|
|
|
|
2,338
|
|
|
|
(839
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
|
(4,452
|
)
|
|
|
4,375
|
|
|
|
10,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 195
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders
Equity (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
Amounts
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except share and per share data)
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
(1,241
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation adjustment
|
|
|
(1,423
|
)
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
(347
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
|
(187
|
)
|
|
|
880
|
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net derivative gains (losses) arising from cash flow hedging
activities, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net of
reclassification adjustments
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement plan liabilities adjustment, net of tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
(525
|
)
|
|
|
(641
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net gain (loss)
|
|
|
(1,313
|
)
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service credit
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Minimum pension liability adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense)
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustment to initially apply FAS 158, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(532
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
|
(1,498
|
)
|
|
|
(525
|
)
|
|
|
(641
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), end of year
|
|
|
(6,328
|
)
|
|
|
4,643
|
|
|
|
9,110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treasury stock, at cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
|
(6,685
|
)
|
|
|
(1,897
|
)
|
|
|
(2,197
|
)
|
|
|
(221,743,421
|
)
|
|
|
(150,131,273
|
)
|
|
|
(154,680,704
|
)
|
Shares purchased
|
|
|
(1,912
|
)
|
|
|
(5,104
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
|
(37,931,370
|
)
|
|
|
(76,519,859
|
)
|
|
|
(288,365
|
)
|
Shares issued under stock plans
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
1,290,431
|
|
|
|
4,958,345
|
|
|
|
4,579,913
|
|
Other
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
15,436
|
|
|
|
(50,634
|
)
|
|
|
257,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
|
(8,450
|
)
|
|
|
(6,685
|
)
|
|
|
(1,897
|
)
|
|
|
(258,368,924
|
)
|
|
|
(221,743,421
|
)
|
|
|
(150,131,273
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity, end of year
|
|
$
|
52,710
|
|
|
$
|
95,801
|
|
|
$
|
101,677
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
196 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Summary:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
755
|
|
|
$
|
35,171
|
|
|
$
|
6,252
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
47,484
|
|
|
|
(67,834
|
)
|
|
|
(66,914
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(41,919
|
)
|
|
|
33,307
|
|
|
|
60,241
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash
|
|
|
6,358
|
|
|
|
694
|
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
Cash at beginning of year
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
|
|
1,590
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of year
|
|
$
|
8,642
|
|
|
$
|
2,284
|
|
|
$
|
1,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(99,289
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,200
|
|
|
$
|
14,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncash revenues, expenses, gains and losses included in
income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized market valuation losses on AIGFP super senior credit
default swap portfolio
|
|
$
|
28,602
|
|
|
$
|
11,472
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Net (gains) losses on sales of securities available for sale and
other assets
|
|
|
5,572
|
|
|
|
(1,349
|
)
|
|
|
(763
|
)
|
Foreign exchange transaction (gains) losses
|
|
|
(2,958
|
)
|
|
|
(104
|
)
|
|
|
1,795
|
|
Net unrealized (gains) losses on non-AIGFP derivatives and other
assets and liabilities
|
|
|
23,575
|
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
|
(713
|
)
|
Equity in (income) loss from equity method investments, net of
dividends or distributions
|
|
|
5,410
|
|
|
|
(4,760
|
)
|
|
|
(3,990
|
)
|
Amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
12,400
|
|
|
|
11,602
|
|
|
|
11,578
|
|
Depreciation and other amortization
|
|
|
3,523
|
|
|
|
3,913
|
|
|
|
3,564
|
|
Provision for mortgage, other loans and finance receivables
|
|
|
1,445
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairments
|
|
|
50,958
|
|
|
|
4,715
|
|
|
|
944
|
|
Impairments of goodwill and other assets
|
|
|
4,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of costs related to Federal Reserve Bank of New
York credit facility
|
|
|
11,218
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and life insurance reserves
|
|
|
11,787
|
|
|
|
16,242
|
|
|
|
12,930
|
|
Premiums and insurance balances receivable and
payable net
|
|
|
(258
|
)
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
|
|
(1,214
|
)
|
Reinsurance assets
|
|
|
(565
|
)
|
|
|
923
|
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
Capitalization of deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
(14,610
|
)
|
|
|
(15,987
|
)
|
|
|
(15,486
|
)
|
Investment income due and accrued
|
|
|
364
|
|
|
|
(401
|
)
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
Funds held under reinsurance treaties
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
(151
|
)
|
|
|
(1,612
|
)
|
Other policyholder funds
|
|
|
763
|
|
|
|
1,374
|
|
|
|
(498
|
)
|
Income taxes receivable and payable net
|
|
|
(8,992
|
)
|
|
|
(3,709
|
)
|
|
|
2,003
|
|
Commissions, expenses and taxes payable
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
989
|
|
|
|
408
|
|
Other assets and liabilities net
|
|
|
(2,567
|
)
|
|
|
3,255
|
|
|
|
(444
|
)
|
Trade receivables and payables net
|
|
|
(6,698
|
)
|
|
|
2,243
|
|
|
|
(198
|
)
|
Trading securities
|
|
|
2,746
|
|
|
|
(2,850
|
)
|
|
|
(7,936
|
)
|
Net unrealized (gain) loss on swaps, options and forward
transactions (net of collateral)
|
|
|
(37,996
|
)
|
|
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
(1,482
|
)
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
|
|
|
16,971
|
|
|
|
9,341
|
|
|
|
(16,568
|
)
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
(3,020
|
)
|
|
|
(11,391
|
)
|
|
|
9,552
|
|
Securities and spot commodities sold but not yet purchased
|
|
|
(2,027
|
)
|
|
|
633
|
|
|
|
(1,899
|
)
|
Finance receivables and other loans held for sale
originations and purchases
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
(5,145
|
)
|
|
|
(10,822
|
)
|
Sales of finance receivables and other loans held
for sale
|
|
|
558
|
|
|
|
5,671
|
|
|
|
10,603
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(182
|
)
|
|
|
477
|
|
|
|
541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments
|
|
|
100,044
|
|
|
|
28,971
|
|
|
|
(7,796
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
755
|
|
|
$
|
35,171
|
|
|
$
|
6,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 197
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statement of Cash Flows (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from (payments for)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of fixed maturity securities available for sale and hybrid
investments
|
|
$
|
104,099
|
|
|
$
|
87,691
|
|
|
$
|
93,146
|
|
Maturities of fixed maturity securities available for sale and
hybrid investments
|
|
|
18,837
|
|
|
|
44,629
|
|
|
|
19,686
|
|
Sales of equity securities available for sale
|
|
|
10,969
|
|
|
|
9,616
|
|
|
|
12,475
|
|
Maturities of fixed maturity securities held to maturity
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
Sales of trading securities
|
|
|
29,909
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of flight equipment
|
|
|
430
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
697
|
|
Sales or distributions of other invested assets
|
|
|
17,314
|
|
|
|
14,109
|
|
|
|
14,084
|
|
Payments received on mortgage and other loans receivable
|
|
|
7,229
|
|
|
|
9,062
|
|
|
|
5,227
|
|
Principal payments received on finance receivables held for
investment
|
|
|
12,282
|
|
|
|
12,553
|
|
|
|
12,586
|
|
Funding to establish Maiden Lane III LLC
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of fixed maturity securities available for sale and
hybrid investments
|
|
|
(115,625
|
)
|
|
|
(139,184
|
)
|
|
|
(145,802
|
)
|
Purchases of equity securities available for sale
|
|
|
(8,813
|
)
|
|
|
(10,933
|
)
|
|
|
(14,482
|
)
|
Purchases of fixed maturity securities held to maturity
|
|
|
(88
|
)
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
(197
|
)
|
Purchases of trading securities
|
|
|
(26,807
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of flight equipment (including progress payments)
|
|
|
(3,528
|
)
|
|
|
(4,772
|
)
|
|
|
(6,009
|
)
|
Purchases of other invested assets
|
|
|
(18,641
|
)
|
|
|
(26,688
|
)
|
|
|
(16,040
|
)
|
Mortgage and other loans receivable issued
|
|
|
(7,486
|
)
|
|
|
(12,439
|
)
|
|
|
(8,066
|
)
|
Finance receivables held for investment originations
and purchases
|
|
|
(13,523
|
)
|
|
|
(15,271
|
)
|
|
|
(13,830
|
)
|
Change in securities lending invested collateral
|
|
|
51,565
|
|
|
|
(12,303
|
)
|
|
|
(9,835
|
)
|
Net additions to real estate, fixed assets, and other assets
|
|
|
(1,289
|
)
|
|
|
(870
|
)
|
|
|
(1,097
|
)
|
Net change in short-term investments
|
|
|
(3,032
|
)
|
|
|
(23,484
|
)
|
|
|
(10,620
|
)
|
Net change in non-AIGFP derivative assets and liabilities
|
|
|
(1,444
|
)
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
$
|
47,484
|
|
|
$
|
(67,834
|
)
|
|
$
|
(66,914
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from (payments for)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policyholder contract deposits
|
|
$
|
47,296
|
|
|
$
|
64,829
|
|
|
$
|
57,197
|
|
Policyholder contract withdrawals
|
|
|
(69,745
|
)
|
|
|
(58,675
|
)
|
|
|
(43,413
|
)
|
Change in other deposits
|
|
|
(557
|
)
|
|
|
(355
|
)
|
|
|
266
|
|
Change in commercial paper and extendible commercial notes
|
|
|
(12,525
|
)
|
|
|
(338
|
)
|
|
|
2,960
|
|
Issuance of other long-term debt
|
|
|
113,501
|
|
|
|
103,210
|
|
|
|
71,028
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank of New York credit facility borrowings
|
|
|
96,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank of New York Commercial Paper Funding
Facility borrowings
|
|
|
15,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayments on other long-term debt
|
|
|
(138,951
|
)
|
|
|
(79,738
|
)
|
|
|
(36,489
|
)
|
Repayments on Federal Reserve Bank of New York credit facility
borrowings
|
|
|
(59,850
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in securities lending payable
|
|
|
(76,916
|
)
|
|
|
11,757
|
|
|
|
9,789
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of Series D preferred stock and
common stock warrant
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from common stock issued
|
|
|
7,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of treasury stock
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
Payments advanced to purchase shares
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
(6,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid to shareholders
|
|
|
(1,628
|
)
|
|
|
(1,881
|
)
|
|
|
(1,638
|
)
|
Acquisition of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(610
|
)
|
|
|
308
|
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$
|
(41,919
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,307
|
|
|
$
|
60,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplementary disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
$
|
7,437
|
|
|
$
|
8,818
|
|
|
$
|
6,539
|
|
Taxes
|
|
$
|
617
|
|
|
$
|
5,163
|
|
|
$
|
4,693
|
|
Non-cash financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consideration received for preferred stock not yet issued
|
|
$
|
23,000
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Interest credited to policyholder accounts included in financing
activities
|
|
$
|
2,566
|
|
|
$
|
11,628
|
|
|
$
|
10,746
|
|
Treasury stock acquired using payments advanced to purchase
shares
|
|
$
|
1,912
|
|
|
$
|
5,088
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Present value of future contract adjustment payments related to
issuance of equity units
|
|
$
|
431
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Non-cash investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt assumed on acquisitions and warehoused investments
|
|
$
|
153
|
|
|
$
|
791
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
198 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statement of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(99,289
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,200
|
|
|
$
|
14,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax benefit on above changes
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) of
investments net of reclassification adjustments
|
|
|
(13,670
|
)
|
|
|
(8,046
|
)
|
|
|
2,574
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense) on above changes
|
|
|
4,948
|
|
|
|
2,338
|
|
|
|
(839
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
|
|
(1,423
|
)
|
|
|
1,325
|
|
|
|
1,283
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense) on above changes
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
|
(140
|
)
|
|
|
(347
|
)
|
Net derivative gains (losses) arising from cash flow hedging
activities net of reclassification adjustments
|
|
|
(156
|
)
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
13
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit) on above changes
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Change in retirement plan liabilities adjustment
|
|
|
(1,325
|
)
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
80
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense) on above changes
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(74
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(10,971
|
)
|
|
|
(4,467
|
)
|
|
|
2,675
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(110,260
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,733
|
|
|
$
|
16,723
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 199
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Index of
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
|
Note 1.
|
|
|
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
|
|
|
201
|
|
|
Note 2.
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
221
|
|
|
Note 3.
|
|
|
Segment Information
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
Note 4.
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
Note 5.
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
Note 6.
|
|
|
Lending Activities
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
Note 7.
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
Note 8.
|
|
|
Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
Note 9.
|
|
|
Variable Interest Entities
|
|
|
257
|
|
|
Note 10.
|
|
|
Derivatives and Hedge Accounting
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
Note 11.
|
|
|
Liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense and
Future policy benefits for life and accident and health
insurance contracts and Policyholder contract deposits
|
|
|
270
|
|
|
Note 12.
|
|
|
Variable Life and Annuity Contracts
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
Note 13.
|
|
|
Debt Outstanding
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
Note 14.
|
|
|
Commitments, Contingencies and Guarantees
|
|
|
281
|
|
|
Note 15.
|
|
|
Shareholders Equity and Earnings Per Share
|
|
|
293
|
|
|
Note 16.
|
|
|
Statutory Financial Data
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
Note 17.
|
|
|
Share-based Employee Compensation Plans
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
Note 18.
|
|
|
Employee Benefits
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
Note 19.
|
|
|
Ownership and Transactions with Related Parties
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
Note 20.
|
|
|
Federal Income Taxes
|
|
|
310
|
|
|
Note 21.
|
|
|
Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)
|
|
|
315
|
|
|
Note 22.
|
|
|
Information Provided in Connection With Outstanding Debt
|
|
|
316
|
|
|
Note 23.
|
|
|
Subsequent Events
|
|
|
321
|
|
200 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
1.
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
|
Basis of
Presentation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
American International Group, Inc. (AIG), its controlled
subsidiaries, and variable interest entities in which AIG is the
primary beneficiary. Entities that AIG does not consolidate but
in which it holds 20 percent to 50 percent of the
voting rights
and/or has
the ability to exercise significant influence are accounted for
under the equity method.
Certain of AIGs foreign subsidiaries included in the
consolidated financial statements report on a fiscal year ended
November 30. The effect on AIGs consolidated
financial condition and results of operations of all material
events occurring between November 30 and December 31 for all
periods presented has been recorded.
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted
accounting principles (GAAP). All material intercompany accounts
and transactions have been eliminated.
Going
Concern Considerations
Recent
Events
During the third quarter of 2008, requirements (i) to post
collateral in connection with AIG Financial Products Corp. and
AIG Trading Group Inc. and their respective subsidiaries
(collectively, AIGFP) credit default swap (CDS) portfolio and
other AIGFP transactions and (ii) to fund returns of
securities lending collateral placed stress on AIGs
liquidity. AIGs stock price declined from $22.76 on
September 8, 2008 to $4.76 on September 15, 2008. On
that date, AIGs long-term debt ratings were downgraded by
Standard & Poors, a division of The McGraw-Hill
Companies, Inc. (S&P), Moodys Investors Service
(Moodys) and Fitch Ratings (Fitch), which triggered
additional requirements for liquidity. These and other events
severely limited AIGs access to debt and equity markets.
On September 22, 2008, AIG entered into an $85 billion
revolving credit agreement (the Fed Credit Agreement) with the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York (the NY Fed) and, pursuant to
the Fed Credit Agreement, AIG agreed to issue
100,000 shares of Series C Perpetual, Convertible,
Participating Preferred Stock (the Series C Preferred
Stock) to a trust for the sole benefit of the United States
Treasury (together with its trustees, the Trust). The total
commitment under the facility created pursuant to the Fed Credit
Agreement (the Fed Facility) was reduced to $60 billion
effective November 25, 2008. The commitment fees and
interest rate were reduced and the maturity was extended by
three years.
In addition, during the fourth quarter of 2008, AIG completed
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Issued $40 billion of Series D Fixed Rate Cumulative
Perpetual Preferred Stock;
|
|
|
|
Sold $39.3 billion face amount of residential
mortgage-backed securities (RMBS) to Maiden Lane II LLC (ML
II);
|
|
|
|
Terminated approximately $62.1 billion notional amount of
CDS on super senior multi-sector collateralized debt obligations
in connection with the Maiden Lane III LLC (ML III)
transaction; and
|
|
|
|
Participated in the NY Feds Commercial Paper Funding
Facility.
|
See Notes 5, 13 and 15 for details on these
arrangements.
In the fourth quarter of 2008, the global financial crisis
continued, characterized by a lack of liquidity, highly volatile
markets, a steep depreciation in asset values across many asset
classes, an erosion of investor confidence, a large widening of
credit spreads in some sectors, a lack of price transparency in
many markets and the collapse of several prominent financial
institutions.
AIG was materially and adversely affected by these conditions
and events in a number of ways, including:
|
|
|
|
|
severe and continued declines in the valuation and performance
of its investment portfolio across many asset classes, leading
to decreased investment income, material unrealized and realized
losses, including other
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 201
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
other-than-temporary impairments, both of which decreased
AIGs shareholders equity and, to a lesser extent,
the regulatory capital of its subsidiaries;
|
|
|
|
|
significant credit losses due to the failure of, or governmental
intervention with respect to, several prominent
institutions; and
|
|
|
|
a general decline in business activity leading to reduced
premium volume, increases in surrenders or cancellations of
policies and increased competition from other insurers.
|
At December 31, 2008, amounts owed under the Fed Facility
totaled $40.4 billion, including accrued fees and interest,
and the remaining available amount under the Fed Facility was
$23.2 billion.
Liquidity
of Parent and Subsidiaries
AIG manages liquidity at both the parent and subsidiary levels.
Since the fourth quarter of 2008, AIG has not had access to its
traditional sources of long-term or short-term financing through
the public debt markets. Further, in light of AIGs current
common stock price, AIG does not expect to be able to issue
equity securities in the public markets in the foreseeable
future.
Traditionally AIG depended on dividends, distributions, and
other payments from subsidiaries to fund payments on its
obligations. In light of AIGs current financial situation,
many of its regulated subsidiaries are restricted from making
dividend payments, or advancing funds, to AIG. Primary uses of
cash flow are for debt service and subsidiary funding.
As a result, AIG has been dependent on the Fed Facility, CPFF
and other transactions with the NY Fed and the United States
Department of the Treasury as its primary sources of liquidity.
Certain subsidiaries also have been dependent on the NY Fed and
the United States Department of the Treasury to meet collateral
posting requirements, make debt repayments as amounts came due,
and to meet capital or liquidity requirements at the insurance
companies (primarily in the Life Insurance &
Retirement Services segment) and other financial services
operations.
March
2009 Agreements in Principle
On March 2, 2009, AIG, the NY Fed and the United States
Department of the Treasury announced agreements in principle to
modify the terms of the Fed Credit Agreement and the
Series D Preferred Stock and to provide a $30 billion
equity capital commitment facility. The United States Government
has issued the following statement referring to the agreements
in principle and other transactions they expect to undertake
with AIG intended to strengthen AIGs capital position,
enhance its liquidity, reduce its borrowing costs and facilitate
AIGs asset disposition program.
The steps announced today provide tangible evidence of the
U.S. governments commitment to the orderly
restructuring of AIG over time in the face of continuing market
dislocations and economic deterioration. Orderly restructuring
is essential to AIGs repayment of the support it has
received from U.S. taxpayers and to preserving financial
stability. The U.S. government is committed to continuing to
work with AIG to maintain its ability to meet its obligations as
they come due.
See Note 23 herein.
Managements
Plans for Stabilization of AIG and Repayment of AIGs
Obligations as They Come Due
AIG has developed certain plans (described below), some of which
have already been implemented, to provide stability to its
businesses and to provide for the timely repayment of the Fed
Facility.
On October 3, 2008, AIG announced a restructuring plan
under which AIGs Life Insurance & Retirement Services
operations and certain other businesses would be divested in
whole or in part. Since that time, AIG has sold certain
businesses and assets and has entered into contracts to sell
others. However, global market conditions have
202 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
continued to deteriorate, posing risks to AIGs ability to
divest assets at acceptable values. As announced on
March 2, 2009 and as described in Note 23 herein,
AIGs restructuring plan has evolved in response to these
market conditions. Specifically, AIGs current plans
involve transactions between AIG and the NY Fed with respect to
AIA and ALICO, as well as preparation for a potential sale of a
minority stake in its property and casualty and foreign
general insurance businesses.
AIG believes that these current plans are necessary to maximize
the value of its businesses over a longer time frame. Therefore,
some businesses that have previously been prepared for sale will
be divested, some will be held for later divestiture, and some
businesses will be prepared for potential subsequent offerings
to the public. Dispositions of certain businesses will be
subject to regulatory approval. Proceeds from these
dispositions, to the extent they do not represent required
capital of AIGs insurance company subsidiaries, are
contractually required to be applied toward the repayment of the
Fed Facility as mandatory repayments.
In connection with the restructuring plan, in the fourth quarter
of 2008, AIG sold its interest in a Brazilian joint venture with
Unibanco AIG Seguros S.A. and entered into contracts to sell AIG
Private Bank Ltd., HSB Group, Inc., its Taiwan Finance business
and a small German general insurance subsidiary. These
operations had total assets and liabilities with carrying values
of approximately $9.6 billion and $8.2 billion,
respectively, at December 31, 2008. Aggregate proceeds from
the sale of these businesses, after giving effect to the
repayment of intercompany loan facilities, are expected to be
$1.9 billion. Through February 18, 2009, AIG has also
entered into contracts to sell its life insurance operations in
Canada and certain Consumer Finance businesses in the
Philippines and Thailand.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144
requires that certain criteria be met in order for AIG to
classify a business as held for sale. At December 31, 2008,
the held for sale criteria in FAS 144 were not met for
AIGs significant businesses included in the asset
disposition plan. AIG continues to evaluate the status of its
asset sales with respect to these criteria.
Subject to satisfaction of certain closing conditions, including
regulatory approvals, AIG expects those sales that are under
contract to close during the first half of 2009. These
operations had total assets and liabilities with carrying values
of approximately $14.1 billion and $12.6 billion,
respectively, at December 31, 2008. Aggregate proceeds from
the sale of these businesses, including repayment of
intercompany loan facilities, is expected to be
$2.8 billion. These eight transactions are expected to
generate $2.1 billion of net cash proceeds to repay
outstanding borrowings on the Fed Facility, after taking
insurance affiliate capital requirements into account.
AIG expects to divest its Institutional Asset Management
businesses that manage third-party assets. These businesses
offered for sale exclude those providing traditional fixed
income and shorter duration asset and liability management for
AIGs insurance company subsidiaries. The extraction of
these asset management businesses will require the establishment
of shared service arrangements between the remaining asset
management businesses and those that are sold as well as the
establishment of new asset management contracts, which will be
determined in conjunction with the buyers of these businesses.
AIGFP is engaged in a multi-step process of unwinding its
businesses and portfolios. In connection with that process,
certain assets have been sold, or are under contract to be sold.
The proceeds from these sales will be used for AIGFPs
liquidity and are not included in the amounts above. The NY Fed
has waived the requirement under the Fed Credit Agreement that
the proceeds of these sales be applied as a mandatory repayment
under the Fed Facility, which would result in a permanent
reduction of the NY Feds commitment to lend to AIG.
Instead, the NY Fed has given AIGFP permission to retain the
proceeds of the completed sales, and has required that such
proceeds be used to voluntarily repay the Fed Facility, with the
amounts repaid available for future reborrowing subject to the
terms of the Fed Facility. AIGFP is also opportunistically
terminating contracts. AIGFP is entering into new derivative
transactions only to hedge its current portfolio, reduce risk
and hedge the currency, interest rate and other market risks
associated with its affiliated businesses. Due to the long-term
duration of AIGFPs derivative contracts and the complexity
of AIGFPs portfolio, AIG expects that an orderly wind-down
will take a substantial period of time. The cost of executing
the wind-down will depend on many factors, many of which are not
within AIGFPs control, including market conditions,
AIGFPs access to markets via market counterparties, the
availability of liquidity and the potential implications of
further rating downgrades.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 203
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
AIG continually evaluates overall market conditions, performance
of businesses that are for sale, and market and business
performance of competitors and likely bidders for the assets.
This evaluation informs decision-making about the timing and
process of putting businesses up for sale. Depending on market
and business conditions, as noted above, AIG can modify its
sales approach to maximize value for AIG and the
U.S. taxpayers in the disposition process. Such a
modification could result in the sale of additional or other
assets.
AIG developed a plan to review significant projects and
eliminated, delayed, or curtailed those that are discretionary
or non-essential to make available internal resources to improve
liquidity by reducing cash outflows to outside service
providers. AIG also suspended the dividend on its common stock
to preserve capital.
Managements
Assessment and Conclusion
In assessing AIGs current financial position and
developing operating plans for the future, management has made
significant judgments and estimates with respect to the
potential financial and liquidity effects of AIGs risks
and uncertainties, including but not limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
the commitment of the NY Fed and the United States Department of
the Treasury to the orderly restructuring of AIG and their
commitment to continuing to work with AIG to maintain its
ability to meet its obligations as they come due;
|
|
|
|
the potential adverse effects on AIGs businesses that
could result if there are further downgrades by rating agencies,
including in particular, the uncertainty of estimates relating
to AIGFPs derivative transactions, both the number of
counterparties who may elect to terminate under contractual
termination provisions and the amount that would be required to
be paid in the event of a downgrade;
|
|
|
|
the potential delays in asset dispositions and reduction in the
anticipated proceeds therefrom;
|
|
|
|
the potential for continued declines in bond and equity markets;
|
|
|
|
the potential effect on AIG if the capital levels of its
regulated and unregulated subsidiaries prove inadequate to
support current business plans;
|
|
|
|
the effect on AIGs businesses of continued compliance with
the covenants of the Fed Credit Agreement;
|
|
|
|
the potential loss of key personnel that could then reduce the
value of AIGs business and impair its ability to effect a
successful asset disposition plan;
|
|
|
|
the potential that AIG may be unable to complete one or more of
the proposed transactions with the NY Fed and the United States
Department of the Treasury described in Note 23, or that
the transactions do not achieve their desired objectives; and
|
|
|
|
the potential regulatory actions in one or more countries,
including possible actions resulting from the legal change in
control as a result of the issuance of the Series C Preferred
Stock.
|
Based on the U.S. governments continuing commitment, the
agreements in principle and the other expected transactions with
the NY Fed and the United States Department of the Treasury,
managements plans to stabilize AIGs businesses and
dispose of its non-core assets, and after consideration of the
risks and uncertainties to such plans, management believes that
it will have adequate liquidity to finance and operate
AIGs businesses, execute its asset disposition plan and
repay its obligations for at least the next twelve months.
It is possible that the actual outcome of one or more of
managements plans could be materially different, or that
one or more of managements significant judgments or
estimates about the potential effects of these risks and
uncertainties could prove to be materially incorrect. If one or
more of these possible outcomes is realized, AIG may need
additional U.S. government support to meet its obligations as
they come due.
AIGs consolidated financial statements have been prepared
on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of
assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course
of business. These consolidated financial statements do not
include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and
classification of recorded assets nor
204 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
relating to the amounts and classification of liabilities that
may be necessary should AIG be unable to continue as a going
concern.
Use of
Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of
the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues
and expenses during the reporting periods.
AIG considers its most critical accounting estimates to be those
with respect to items considered by management in the
determination of AIGs ability to continue as a going
concern, recoverability of deferred income tax assets, reserves
for losses and loss expenses, future policy benefits for life
and accident and health contracts, recoverability of deferred
policy acquisition costs (DAC), estimated gross profits for
investment-oriented products, the allowance for finance
receivable losses, flight equipment recoverability,
other-than-temporary
impairments in the value of investments, the fair values of
reporting units used in connection with testing for goodwill
impairment, and the fair value measurements of certain assets
and liabilities, including the super senior credit default swaps
written by AIGFP. These estimates, by their nature, are based on
judgment and current facts and circumstances. Therefore, actual
results could differ from these estimates, possibly in the near
term, and could have a material effect on AIGs
consolidated financial statements.
During the second half of 2007 and through 2008, disruption in
the global credit markets, coupled with the repricing of credit
risk, and the U.S. housing market deterioration, created
increasingly difficult conditions in the financial markets.
These conditions have resulted in greater volatility, less
liquidity, widening of credit spreads and a lack of price
transparency in certain markets and have made it more difficult
to value certain of AIGs invested assets and the
obligations and collateral relating to certain financial
instruments issued or held by AIG, such as AIGFPs super
senior credit default swap portfolio.
Certain of AIGs foreign subsidiaries included in the
consolidated financial statements report on a fiscal year ended
November 30. The effect on AIGs consolidated
financial condition and results of operations of all material
events occurring between November 30 and December 31 for all
periods presented has been recorded. AIG determined the
significant appreciation in world-wide fixed income and equity
markets in December 2008 to be an intervening period event that
had a material effect on its consolidated financial condition
and results of operations. AIG reflected the December 2008
market appreciation throughout its investment portfolio.
Accordingly, AIG recorded $5.6 billion ($3.6 billion
after tax) of unrealized appreciation on investments.
Revisions
and Reclassifications
During 2008, AIG began reporting interest expense and other
expenses separately on the consolidated statement of income
(loss). Interest expense represents interest expense on
short-term and long-term debt, excluding interest expense
associated with AIGFP, which is recorded in other income. Other
expenses represent all other expenses not separately disclosed
on the consolidated statement of income (loss). AIG previously
reported certain assets and liabilities of its Financial
Services subsidiaries separately on its consolidated balance
sheet. As of December 31, 2008, AIG has reclassified the
balances previously reported in Financial Services
securities available for sale to bonds available for sale and
has reclassified the balances previously reported in Financial
Services trading securities to bonds and
stocks trading. In addition, non-AIGFP derivative
assets and liabilities previously reported in other assets and
other liabilities are being reported in unrealized gain or
(loss) on swaps, options and forward transactions. All prior
period amounts were revised to conform to the current period
presentation for these reclassifications.
Also during 2008, AIG determined that certain accident and
health contracts in its Foreign General Insurance reporting
unit, which were previously accounted for as short duration
contracts, should be treated as long duration insurance
products. Accordingly, the December 31, 2007 consolidated
balance sheet has been revised to reflect the reclassification
of $763 million of deferred direct response advertising
costs, previously reported in other assets, to
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 205
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
DAC. Additionally, $320 million has been reclassified in
the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2007 from
unearned premiums to future policy benefits for life and
accident and health insurance contracts. These revisions did not
have a material effect on AIGs net income (loss), or
shareholders equity for any period presented.
See Recent Accounting Standards Accounting Changes
below for a discussion of AIGs adoption of the Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Staff Position (FSP) FASB
Interpretation No. (FIN)
39-1,
Amendment of FASB Interpretation No. 39 (FSP
FIN 39-1),
which resulted in reclassifications of amounts previously
presented on the consolidated balance sheet at December 31,
2007.
Fixed
Maturity Securities, Held to Maturity Change in
Intent
During 2008, AIG transferred all securities previously
classified as held to maturity to available for sale. As a
result of the continuing disruption in the credit markets during
2008, AIG changed its intent to hold to maturity certain
tax-exempt municipal securities held by its insurance
subsidiaries, which comprised substantially all of AIGs
held to maturity securities. This change in intent resulted from
a change in certain subsidiaries investment strategies to
increase their allocations to taxable securities, reflecting
AIGs net operating loss position. As of the date the
securities were transferred, the securities had a carrying value
of $20.8 billion and a net unrealized loss of
$752 million.
Accounting
Policies
|
|
(a)
|
Revenue
Recognition and Expenses:
|
Premiums and Other Considerations: Premiums
for short duration contracts and considerations received from
retailers in connection with the sale of extended service
contracts are earned primarily on a pro rata basis over the term
of the related coverage. The reserve for unearned premiums
includes the portion of premiums written and other
considerations relating to the unexpired terms of coverage.
Premiums for long duration insurance products and life
contingent annuities are recognized as revenues when due.
Estimates for premiums due but not yet collected are accrued.
Consideration for universal life and investment-type products
consists of policy charges for the cost of insurance,
administration, and surrenders during the period. Policy charges
collected with respect to future services are deferred and
recognized in a manner similar to DAC related to such products.
Net Investment Income: Net investment income
represents income primarily from the following sources in
AIGs insurance operations and AIG parent:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income and related expenses, including amortization of
premiums and accretion of discounts on bonds with changes in the
timing and the amount of expected principal and interest cash
flows reflected in the yield, as applicable.
|
|
|
|
Dividend income and distributions from common and preferred
stock and other investments when receivable.
|
|
|
|
Realized and unrealized gains and losses from investments in
trading securities accounted for at fair value.
|
|
|
|
Earnings from hedge funds and limited partnership investments
accounted for under the equity method.
|
|
|
|
The difference between the carrying amount of a life settlement
contract and the life insurance proceeds of the underlying life
insurance policy recorded in income upon the death of the
insured.
|
Realized Capital Gains (Losses): Realized
capital gains and losses are determined by specific
identification. The realized capital gains and losses are
generated primarily from the following sources:
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of fixed maturity securities and equity securities (except
trading securities accounted for at fair value), real estate,
investments in joint ventures and limited partnerships and other
types of investments.
|
206 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions to the cost basis of fixed maturity securities and
equity securities (except trading securities accounted for at
fair value) and other invested assets for
other-than-temporary
impairments.
|
|
|
|
Changes in fair value of derivatives except for (1) those
instruments at AIGFP, (2) those instruments that qualify
for hedge accounting treatment under (FAS 133) Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting
for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities when the
change in the fair value of the hedged item is not reported in
realized gains (losses), and (3) those instruments that are
designated as economic hedges of financial instruments for which
the fair value option has been elected under FAS 159,
The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (FAS 159).
|
|
|
|
Exchange gains and losses resulting from foreign currency
transactions.
|
Other Income: Other income includes income
from flight equipment, Asset Management operations, the
operations of AIGFP and finance charges on consumer loans.
Income from flight equipment under operating leases is
recognized over the life of the lease as rentals become
receivable under the provisions of the lease or, in the case of
leases with varying payments, under the straight-line method
over the noncancelable term of the lease. In certain cases,
leases provide for additional payments contingent on usage.
Rental income is recognized at the time such usage occurs less a
provision for future contractual aircraft maintenance. Gains and
losses on flight equipment are recognized when flight equipment
is sold and the risk of ownership of the equipment is passed to
the new owner.
Income from Asset Management operations is generally recognized
as revenues as services are performed. Certain costs incurred in
the sale of mutual funds are deferred and subsequently amortized.
Income from the operations of AIGFP included in other income
consists of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
Change in fair value relating to financial assets and
liabilities for which the fair value option has been elected.
|
|
|
|
Interest income and related expenses, including amortization of
premiums and accretion of discounts on bonds with changes in the
timing and the amount of expected principal and interest cash
flows reflected in the yield, as applicable.
|
|
|
|
Dividend income and distributions from common and preferred
stock and other investments when receivable.
|
|
|
|
Changes in the fair value of derivatives. In certain instances,
no initial gain or loss was recognized in accordance with
Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
(EITF) 02-3,
Issues Involved in Accounting for Derivative Contracts
Held for Trading Purposes and Contracts Involved in Energy
Trading and Risk Management Activities
(EITF 02-3).
Prior to January 1, 2008, the initial gain or loss was
recognized in income over the life of the transaction or when
observable market data became available. Any remaining
unamortized balances at January 1, 2008 were recognized in
beginning retained earnings in the transition to FAS 159.
|
|
|
|
Changes in the fair value of trading securities and spot
commodities sold but not yet purchased, futures and hybrid
financial instruments.
|
|
|
|
Realized gains and losses from the sale of available for sale
securities and investments in private equities, joint ventures,
limited partnerships and other investments.
|
|
|
|
Exchange gains and losses resulting from foreign currency
transactions.
|
|
|
|
Reductions to the cost basis of securities available for sale
for
other-than-temporary
impairments.
|
|
|
|
Earnings from hedge funds and limited partnership investments
accounted for under the equity method.
|
Finance charges on consumer loans are recognized as revenue
using the interest method. Revenue ceases to be accrued when
contractual payments are not received for four consecutive
months for loans and retail sales contracts,
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 207
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
and for six months for revolving retail accounts and private
label receivables. Extension fees, late charges, and prepayment
penalties are recognized as revenue when received.
Policyholder benefits and claims
incurred: Incurred policy losses for short
duration insurance contracts consist of the estimated ultimate
cost of settling claims incurred within the reporting period,
including incurred but not reported claims, plus the changes in
estimates of current and prior period losses resulting from the
continuous review process. Benefits for long duration insurance
contracts consist of benefits paid and changes in future policy
benefits liabilities. Benefits for universal life and
investment-type products primarily consist of interest credited
to policy account balances and benefit payments made in excess
of policy account balances except for certain contracts for
which the fair value option was elected under FAS 159, for
which benefits represent the entire change in fair value
(including derivative gains and losses on related economic
hedges).
Restructuring expenses and related asset impairment and other
expenses: Restructuring expenses include employee
severance and related costs, costs to terminate contractual
arrangements, consulting and other professional fees and other
costs related to restructuring and divesture activities. Asset
impairment includes charges associated with writing down
long-lived assets to fair value when their carrying values are
not recoverable from undiscounted cash flows. Other expenses
include other costs associated with divesting of businesses and
costs of key employee retention awards.
(b) Income Taxes: Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are recorded for the effects of temporary
differences between the tax basis of an asset or liability and
its reported amount in the consolidated financial statements.
AIG assesses its ability to realize deferred tax assets
considering all available evidence, including the earnings
history, the timing, character and amount of future earnings
potential, the reversal of taxable temporary differences, and
the tax planning strategies available to the legal entities when
recognizing deferred tax assets in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. (FAS) 109, Accounting
for Income Taxes (FAS 109). See Note 20 herein
for a further discussion of income taxes.
(c) Investments in Fixed Maturities and Equity
Securities: Bonds held to maturity are
principally owned by insurance subsidiaries and are carried at
amortized cost when AIG has the ability and positive intent to
hold these securities until maturity. When AIG does not have the
positive intent to hold bonds until maturity, these securities
are classified as available for sale or as trading and are
carried at fair value.
During 2008, AIG determined that it no longer had the positive
intent to continue to hold any of its bonds until maturity. All
positions previously classified as held to maturity were
determined to be available for sale.
Premiums and discounts arising from the purchase of bonds
classified as held to maturity or available for sale are treated
as yield adjustments over their estimated lives, until maturity,
or call date, if applicable.
Common and preferred stocks are carried at fair value.
For AIGs Financial Services subsidiaries, those securities
for which the fair value option was not elected, are held to
meet long-term investment objectives and are accounted for as
available for sale, carried at fair values and recorded on a
trade-date basis.
For AIG parent and its insurance subsidiaries, unrealized gains
and losses on investments in trading securities are reported in
Net investment income. Unrealized gains and losses from
available for sale investments in equity and fixed maturity
securities are reported as a separate component of Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss), net of deferred income taxes,
in consolidated shareholders equity. Investments in fixed
maturities and equity securities are recorded on a trade-date
basis.
Trading securities include the investment portfolio of AIGFP and
AIGs economic interests in Maiden Lane II LLC and
membership interests in Maiden Lane III LLC, all of which are
carried at fair value under FAS 159.
Trading securities for AIGFP are held to meet short-term
investment objectives and to economically hedge other
securities. Trading securities are recorded on a trade-date
basis and carried at fair value. Realized and unrealized gains
and losses are reflected in Other income.
208 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
AIG evaluates its available for sale, equity method and cost
method investments for impairment such that a security is
considered a candidate for
other-than-temporary
impairment if it meets any of the following criteria:
|
|
|
|
|
Trading at a significant (25 percent or more) discount to
par, amortized cost (if lower) or cost for an extended period of
time (nine consecutive months or longer);
|
|
|
|
The occurrence of a discrete credit event resulting in
(i) the issuer defaulting on a material outstanding
obligation; (ii) the issuer seeking protection from
creditors under the bankruptcy laws or any similar laws intended
for court supervised reorganization of insolvent enterprises; or
(iii) the issuer proposing a voluntary reorganization
pursuant to which creditors are asked to exchange their claims
for cash or securities having a fair value substantially lower
than par value of their claims; or
|
|
|
|
AIG may not realize a full recovery on its investment regardless
of the occurrence of one of the foregoing events.
|
The determination that a security has incurred an
other-than-temporary
decline in value requires the judgment of management and
consideration of the fundamental condition of the issuer, its
near-term prospects and all the relevant facts and
circumstances. The above criteria also consider circumstances of
a rapid and severe market valuation decline, such as that
experienced in current credit markets, in which AIG could not
reasonably assert that the impairment period would be temporary
(severity losses).
At each balance sheet date, AIG evaluates its securities
holdings with unrealized losses. When AIG does not intend to
hold such securities until they have recovered their cost basis
based on the circumstances at the date of evaluation, AIG
records the unrealized loss in income. If a loss is recognized
from a sale subsequent to a balance sheet date pursuant to
changes in circumstances, the loss is recognized in the period
in which the intent to hold the securities to recovery no longer
existed.
In periods subsequent to the recognition of an
other-than-temporary
impairment charge for fixed maturity securities, which is not
intent, credit or foreign exchange related, AIG generally
accretes into income the discount or amortizes the reduced
premium resulting from the reduction in cost basis over the
remaining life of the security.
Certain investments in beneficial interests in securitized
financial assets of less than high quality with contractual cash
flows, including asset-backed securities, are subject to the
impairment and income recognition guidance of EITF 99-20,
Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased
Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests that Continued to
Be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets as
amended by FSP No. EITF 99-20-1, Amendments to the
Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue No. 99-20, which became
effective prospectively in the fourth quarter of 2008. EITF
99-20 requires periodic updates of AIGs best estimate of
cash flows over the life of the security. If the fair value of
such security is less than its cost or amortized cost and there
has been a decrease in the present value of the estimated cash
flows since the last revised estimate, considering both their
timing and amount, an other-than-temporary impairment charge is
recognized. Interest income is recognized based on changes in
the timing and the amount of expected principal and interest
cash flows reflected in the yield.
AIG also considers its intent and ability to retain a
temporarily impaired security until recovery. Estimating future
cash flows is a quantitative and qualitative process that
incorporates information received from third-party sources and,
in the case of certain structured securities, with certain
internal assumptions and judgments regarding the future
performance of the underlying collateral. In addition,
projections of expected future cash flows may change based upon
new information regarding the performance of the underlying
collateral.
(d) Securities Lending Invested Collateral, at Fair
Value and Securities Lending Payable: AIGs
insurance and asset management operations lend their securities
and primarily take cash as collateral with respect to the
securities lent. Invested collateral consists of
interest-bearing cash equivalents and fixed and floating rate
bonds, whose changes in fair value are recorded as a separate
component of Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net
of deferred income taxes. The invested collateral is evaluated
for
other-than-temporary
impairment by applying the same criteria used for investments in
fixed maturities. Income earned on invested collateral, net of
interest payable to the collateral provider, is recorded in Net
investment income. AIG generally obtains and maintains cash
collateral from securities borrowers at current market levels
for the securities lent. During the fourth
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 209
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
quarter of 2008, in connection with certain securities lending
transactions, AIG failed to obtain or maintain collateral
sufficient to fund substantially all of the cost of purchasing
securities lent to various counterparties. In some cases, this
shortfall in collateral has resulted in AIG accounting for
individual securities lending transactions as sales combined
with a forward purchase commitment rather than as secured
borrowings.
The fair value of securities pledged under securities lending
arrangements was $4 billion and $76 billion at
December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively.
(e) Mortgage and Other Loans Receivable
net: Mortgage and other loans receivable includes
mortgage loans on real estate, policy loans and collateral,
commercial and guaranteed loans. Mortgage loans on real estate
and collateral, commercial and guaranteed loans are carried at
unpaid principal balances less credit allowances and plus or
minus adjustments for the accretion or amortization of discount
or premium. Interest income on such loans is accrued as earned.
Impairment of mortgage and other loans receivable is based on
certain risk factors and recognized when collection of all
amounts due under the contractual terms is not probable. This
impairment is generally measured based on the present value of
expected future cash flows discounted at the loans
effective interest rate subject to the fair value of underlying
collateral. Interest income on such impaired loans is recognized
as cash is received.
Policy loans are carried at unpaid principal amount. There is no
allowance for policy loans because these loans serve to reduce
the death benefit paid when the death claim is made and the
balances are effectively collateralized by the cash surrender
value of the policy.
(f) Finance Receivables: Finance
receivables, which are reported net of unearned finance charges,
are held for both investment purposes and for sale. Finance
receivables held for investment purposes are carried at
amortized cost, which includes accrued finance charges on
interest bearing finance receivables, unamortized deferred
origination costs, and unamortized net premiums and discounts on
purchased finance receivables. The allowance for finance
receivable losses is established through the provision for
finance receivable losses charged to expense and is maintained
at a level considered adequate to absorb estimated credit losses
in the portfolio. The portfolio is periodically evaluated on a
pooled basis and factors such as economic conditions, portfolio
composition, and loss and delinquency experience are considered
in the evaluation of the allowance.
Direct costs of originating finance receivables, net of
nonrefundable points and fees, are deferred and included in the
carrying amount of the related receivables. The amount deferred
is amortized to income as an adjustment to finance charge
revenues using the interest method.
Finance receivables originated and intended for sale in the
secondary market are carried at the lower of cost or fair value,
as determined by aggregate outstanding commitments from
investors or current investor yield requirements. American
General Finance, Inc. (AGF) recognizes net unrealized losses
through a valuation allowance by charges to income.
(g) Flight Equipment: Flight equipment is
stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Major
additions, modifications and interest are capitalized. Normal
maintenance and repairs, airframe and engine overhauls and
compliance with return conditions of flight equipment on lease
are provided by and paid for by the lessee. Under the provisions
of most leases for certain airframe and engine overhauls, the
lessee is reimbursed for certain costs incurred up to but not
exceeding contingent rentals paid to International Lease Finance
Corporation (ILFC) by the lessee. AIG provides a charge to
income for such reimbursements based on the expected
reimbursements during the life of the lease. For passenger
aircraft, depreciation is generally computed on the
straight-line basis to a residual value of approximately
15 percent of the cost of the asset over its estimated
useful life of 25 years. For freighter aircraft,
depreciation is computed on the straight-line basis to a zero
residual value over its useful life of 35 years. At
December 31, 2008, ILFC had 13 freighter aircraft in
its fleet. Aircraft in the fleet are evaluated for impairment in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting No. 144,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived
Assets FAS 144. FAS 144 requires long-lived
assets to be evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may
not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets is measured by
comparing the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted
net cash flows expected to be
210 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
generated by the asset. These evaluations for impairment are
significantly affected by estimates of future net cash flows and
other factors that involve uncertainty.
When assets are retired or disposed of, the cost and associated
accumulated depreciation are removed from the related accounts
and the difference, net of proceeds, is recorded as a gain or
loss in Other income.
Accumulated depreciation on flight equipment was
$12.3 billion and $10.5 billion at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
(h) Other Invested Assets: Other invested
assets consist primarily of investments by AIGs insurance
operations in hedge funds, private equity and limited
partnerships.
Hedge funds and limited partnerships in which AIGs
insurance operations hold in the aggregate less than a five
percent interest are reported at fair value. The change in fair
value is recognized as a component of Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss). With respect to hedge funds and
limited partnerships in which AIG holds in the aggregate a five
percent or greater interest or less than a five percent interest
but in which AIG has more than a minor influence over the
operations of the investee, AIGs carrying value is its
share of the net asset value of the funds or the partnerships.
The changes in such net asset values, accounted for under the
equity method, are recorded in Net investment income.
In applying the equity method of accounting, AIG consistently
uses the most recently available financial information provided
by the general partner or manager of each of these investments,
which is one to three months prior to the end of AIGs
reporting period. The financial statements of these investees
are generally audited on an annual basis.
Other invested assets include investments entered into for
strategic purposes and not solely for capital appreciation or
for income generation. These investments are accounted for under
the equity method. At December 31, 2008, AIGs
significant investments in partially owned companies included
its 26.0 percent interest in Tata AIG Life Insurance
Company, Ltd., its 26.0 percent interest in Tata AIG
General Insurance Company, Ltd. and its 39 percent interest
in The Fuji Fire and Marine Insurance Co., Ltd. Dividends
received from unconsolidated entities in which AIGs
ownership interest is less than 50 percent were
$20 million, $30 million and $28 million for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006,
respectively. The undistributed earnings of unconsolidated
entities in which AIGs ownership interest is less than
50 percent were $227 million, $266 million and
$300 million at December 31, 2008, 2007, and 2006,
respectively.
Also included in Other invested assets are real estate held for
investment, aircraft asset investments held by non-Financial
Services subsidiaries and investments in life settlement
contracts. See Note 5(h) herein for further
information.
(i) Securities Purchased (Sold) Under Agreements to
Resell (Repurchase), at contract
value: Securities purchased under agreements to
resell and Securities sold under agreements to repurchase for
AIGFP are accounted for as collateralized borrowing or lending
transactions and are recorded at their contracted resale or
repurchase amounts, plus accrued interest. AIGs policy is
to take possession of or obtain a security interest in
securities purchased under agreements to resell.
AIG minimizes the credit risk that counterparties to
transactions might be unable to fulfill their contractual
obligations by monitoring customer credit exposure and
collateral value and generally requiring additional collateral
to be deposited with AIG when necessary.
(j) Short-term Investments: Short-term
investments consist of interest-bearing cash equivalents, time
deposits, and investments with original maturities within one
year from the date of purchase, such as commercial paper.
(k) Cash: Cash represents cash on hand
and non-interest bearing demand deposits.
(l) Premiums and Insurance Balances
Receivable: Premiums and insurance balances
receivable consist of premium balances, less commissions payable
thereon, due from agents and brokers and insureds. The allowance
for
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 211
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
doubtful accounts on premiums and insurance balances receivable
was $578 million and $662 million at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
(m) Reinsurance Assets: Reinsurance
assets include the balances due from reinsurance and insurance
companies under the terms of AIGs reinsurance agreements
for paid and unpaid losses and loss expenses, ceded unearned
premiums and ceded future policy benefits for life and accident
and health insurance contracts and benefits paid and unpaid.
Amounts related to paid and unpaid losses and benefits and loss
expenses with respect to these reinsurance agreements are
substantially collateralized. The allowance for doubtful
accounts on reinsurance assets was $425 million and
$520 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
(n) Trade Receivables and Trade
Payables: Trade receivables and Trade payables
for AIGFP include option premiums paid and received and
receivables from and payables to counterparties that relate to
unrealized gains and losses on futures, forwards, and options
and balances due from and due to clearing brokers and exchanges.
(o) Deferred Policy Acquisition
Costs: Policy acquisition costs represent those
costs, including commissions, premium taxes and other
underwriting expenses that vary with and are primarily related
to the acquisition of new business.
Short-duration Insurance Contracts: Policy
acquisition costs are deferred and amortized over the period in
which the related premiums written are earned. DAC is grouped
consistent with the manner in which the insurance contracts are
acquired, serviced and measured for profitability and is
reviewed for recoverability based on the profitability of the
underlying insurance contracts. Investment income is not
anticipated in assessing the recoverability of DAC.
Long-duration Insurance Contracts: Policy
acquisition costs for participating life, traditional life and
accident and health insurance products are generally deferred
and amortized, with interest, over the premium paying period in
accordance with FAS 60, Accounting and Reporting by
Insurance Enterprises (FAS 60). Policy acquisition
costs and policy issuance costs related to universal life, and
investment-type products (investment-oriented products) are
deferred and amortized, with interest, in relation to the
incidence of estimated gross profits to be realized over the
estimated lives of the contracts in accordance with FAS 97,
Accounting and Reporting by Insurance Enterprises for
Certain Long-Duration Contracts and for Realized Gains and
Losses from the Sale of Investments (FAS 97).
Estimated gross profits are composed of net interest income, net
realized investment gains and losses, fees, surrender charges,
expenses, and mortality and morbidity gains and losses. If
estimated gross profits change significantly, DAC is
recalculated using the new assumptions. Any resulting adjustment
is included in income as an adjustment to DAC. DAC is grouped
consistent with the manner in which the insurance contracts are
acquired, serviced and measured for profitability and is
reviewed for recoverability based on the current and projected
future profitability of the underlying insurance contracts.
The DAC for investment-oriented products is also adjusted with
respect to estimated gross profits as a result of changes in the
net unrealized gains or losses on fixed maturity and equity
securities available for sale. Because fixed maturity and equity
securities available for sale are carried at aggregate fair
value, an adjustment is made to DAC equal to the change in
amortization that would have been recorded if such securities
had been sold at their stated aggregate fair value and the
proceeds reinvested at current yields. The change in this
adjustment, net of tax, is included with the change in net
unrealized gains/losses on fixed maturity and equity securities
available for sale that is credited or charged directly to
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).
Value of Business Acquired (VOBA) is determined at the time of
acquisition and is reported in the consolidated balance sheet
with DAC. This value is based on the present value of future
pre-tax profits discounted at yields applicable at the time of
purchase. For products accounted for under FAS 60, VOBA is
amortized over the life of the business similar to that for DAC
based on the assumptions at purchase. For products accounted for
under FAS 97, VOBA is amortized in relation to the
estimated gross profits to date for each period.
Beginning in 2008, for contracts accounted for at fair value
under FAS 159, policy acquisition costs are expensed as
incurred and not deferred or amortized.
212 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(p) Real Estate and Other Fixed
Assets: The costs of buildings and furniture and
equipment are depreciated principally on the straight-line basis
over their estimated useful lives (maximum of 40 years for
buildings and ten years for furniture and equipment).
Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to income
as incurred; expenditures for betterments are capitalized and
depreciated. AIG periodically assesses the carrying value of its
real estate for purposes of determining any asset impairment.
Also included in Real Estate and Other Fixed Assets are
capitalized software costs, which represent costs directly
related to obtaining, developing or upgrading internal use
software. Such costs are capitalized and amortized using the
straight-line method over a period generally not exceeding five
years.
Real estate, fixed assets and other long-lived assets are
assessed for impairment in accordance with FAS 144 when
certain impairment indicators exist.
Accumulated depreciation on real estate and other fixed assets
was $5.8 billion and $5.4 billion at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
(q) Unrealized Gain and Unrealized Loss on Swaps,
Options and Forward Transactions: Interest rate,
currency, equity and commodity swaps (including AIGFPs
super senior credit default swap portfolio), swaptions, options
and forward transactions are accounted for as derivatives
recorded on a trade-date basis, and carried at fair value.
Unrealized gains and losses are reflected in income, when
appropriate. In certain instances, when income is not recognized
at inception of the contract, income is recognized over the life
of the contract and as observable market data becomes available.
Aggregate asset or liability positions are netted on the Balance
Sheet to the extent permitted by qualifying master netting
arrangements in place with each respective counterparty. Cash
collateral posted by AIG with counterparties in conjunction with
these transactions is reported as a reduction of the
corresponding net derivative liability, while cash collateral
received by AIG in conjunction with these transactions is
reported as a reduction of the corresponding net derivative
asset.
(r) Goodwill: Goodwill is the excess of
the cost of an acquired business over the fair value of the
identifiable net assets of the acquired business. Goodwill is
tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if
circumstances indicate an impairment may have occurred. During
2008, AIG performed goodwill impairment tests at June 30,
September 30, and December 31.
The impairment assessment involves a two-step process in which
an initial assessment for potential impairment is performed and,
if potential impairment is present, the amount of impairment is
measured and recorded. Impairment is tested at the reporting
unit level or, when all reporting units that comprise an
operating segment have similar economic characteristics,
impairment is tested at the operating segment level.
Management initially assesses the potential for impairment by
estimating the fair value of each of AIGs reporting units
or operating segments and comparing the estimated fair values
with the carrying amounts of those reporting units, including
allocated goodwill. The estimate of a reporting units fair
value may be based on one or a combination of approaches
including market-based earning multiples of the units peer
companies, discounted expected future cash flows, external
appraisals or, in the case of reporting units being considered
for sale, third-party indications of fair value, if available.
Management considers one or more of these estimates when
determining the fair value of a reporting unit to be used in the
impairment test. As part of the impairment test, management
compares the sum of the estimated fair values of AIGs
reporting units with AIGs fully diluted common stock
market capitalization as a basis for concluding on the
reasonableness of the estimated reporting unit fair values.
If the estimated fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its
carrying value, goodwill is not impaired. If the carrying value
of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, goodwill
associated with that reporting unit potentially is impaired. The
amount of impairment, if any, is measured as the excess of the
carrying value of goodwill over the estimated fair value of the
goodwill. The estimated fair value of the goodwill is measured
as the excess of the fair value of the reporting unit over the
amounts that would be assigned to the reporting units
assets and liabilities in a hypothetical business combination.
An impairment charge is recognized in income to the extent of
the excess.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 213
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(s) Other Assets: Other assets consists
of a prepaid commitment fee asset related to the Fed Credit
Agreement, prepaid expenses, including deferred advertising
costs, sales inducement assets, deposits, other deferred
charges, intangible assets other than goodwill and spot
commodities held by AIGFP. The prepaid commitment fee asset
related to the NY Fed Credit Agreement is being amortized as
interest expense ratably over the five-year term of the
agreement, accelerated for actual pay-downs that reduce the
total credit available.
Certain direct response advertising costs are deferred and
amortized over the expected future benefit period in accordance
with
SOP 93-7,
Reporting on Advertising Costs. When AIG can
demonstrate that its customers have responded specifically to
direct-response advertising, the primary purpose of which is to
elicit sales to customers, and when it can be shown such
advertising results in probable future economic benefits, the
advertising costs are capitalized. Deferred advertising costs
are amortized on a cost-pool-by-cost-pool basis over the
expected future economic benefit period and are reviewed
regularly for recoverability. Deferred advertising costs totaled
$640 million and $1.35 billion at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. The amount of expense amortized
into income was $483 million, $395 million and
$359 million, for the years ended 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
Also during 2008, AIG determined that certain accident and
health contracts in its Foreign General Insurance reporting
unit, which were previously accounted for as short duration
contracts, should be treated as long duration insurance
products. For further discussion, see Revisions and
Reclassifications above.
AIG offers sales inducements, which include enhanced crediting
rates or bonus payments to contract holders (bonus interest) on
certain annuity and investment contract products. Sales
inducements provided to the contractholder are recognized as
part of the liability for policyholders contract deposits
in the consolidated balance sheet. Such amounts are deferred and
amortized over the life of the contract using the same
methodology and assumptions used to amortize DAC. To qualify for
such accounting treatment, the bonus interest must be explicitly
identified in the contract at inception, and AIG must
demonstrate that such amounts are incremental to amounts AIG
credits on similar contracts without bonus interest, and are
higher than the contracts expected ongoing crediting rates
for periods after the bonus period. The deferred bonus interest
and other deferred sales inducement assets totaled
$1.8 billion and $1.7 billion at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. The amortization expense associated
with these assets is reported within Policyholder benefits and
claims incurred in the consolidated statement of income. Such
amortization expense totaled $56 million, $149 million
and $132 million for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Spot commodities held in AIGFPs wholly owned broker-dealer
subsidiary are recorded at fair value. All other commodities are
recorded at the lower of cost or fair value. Spot commodities
are recorded on a trade-date basis. The exposure to market risk
may be reduced through the use of forwards, futures and option
contracts. Lower of cost or fair value reductions in commodity
positions and unrealized gains and losses in related derivatives
are reflected in Other income.
See Note 10 herein for a discussion of derivatives.
(t) Separate Accounts: Separate accounts
represent funds for which investment income and investment gains
and losses accrue directly to the policyholders who bear the
investment risk. Each account has specific investment
objectives, and the assets are carried at fair value. The assets
of each account are legally segregated and are not subject to
claims that arise out of any other business of AIG. The
liabilities for these accounts are equal to the account assets.
(u) Liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment
expense: Claims and claims adjustment expenses
are charged to income as incurred. The liability for unpaid
claims and claims adjustment expense represents the accumulation
of estimates for unpaid reported losses and includes provisions
for losses incurred but not reported. The methods of determining
such estimates and establishing resulting reserves, including
amounts relating to allowances for estimated unrecoverable
reinsurance, are reviewed and updated. If the estimate of
reserves is determined to be inadequate or redundant, the
increase or decrease is reflected in income. AIG discounts its
loss reserves relating to workers compensation business
written by its U.S. domiciled subsidiaries as permitted by
the domiciliary statutory regulatory authorities.
214 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(v) Future Policy Benefits for Life and Accident and
Health Contracts and Policyholder Contract
Deposits: The liability for future policy
benefits and policyholder contract deposits are established
using assumptions described in Note 11 herein. Future
policy benefits for life and accident and health insurance
contracts include provisions for future dividends to
participating policyholders, accrued in accordance with all
applicable regulatory or contractual provisions. Policyholder
contract deposits include AIGs liability for
(a) certain guarantee benefits accounted for as embedded
derivatives at fair value in accordance with FAS 133 and
(b) certain contracts that AIG has elected to account for
at fair value beginning in 2008 in accordance with FAS 159.
See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional FAS 159 disclosures.
(w) Other Policyholder Funds: Other
policyholder funds are reported at cost and include any
policyholders funds on deposit that encompass premium
deposits and similar items.
(x) Securities and Spot Commodities Sold but not yet
Purchased, at Fair Value: Securities and spot
commodities sold but not yet purchased represent sales of
securities and spot commodities not owned at the time of sale.
The obligations arising from such transactions are recorded on a
trade-date basis and carried at fair value. Also included are
obligations under gold leases, which are accounted for as a debt
host with an embedded gold derivative. Beginning January 1,
2008, AIGFP elected the fair value option for these debt host
contracts.
(y) Commercial Paper and Extendible Commercial Notes and
Long-Term Debt: AIGs funding consists, in
part, of medium and long-term debt and commercial paper.
Commercial paper, when issued at a discount, is recorded at the
proceeds received and accreted to its par value. Extendible
commercial notes were issued by AGF with initial maturities of
up to 90 days, but were extended by AGF in mid-September
2008 to 390 days. Long-term debt is carried at the
principal amount borrowed, net of unamortized discounts or
premiums. See Note 13 herein for additional information.
Long-term debt also includes liabilities connected to trust
preferred stock principally related to outstanding securities
issued by AIG Life Holdings (US), Inc. (AIGLH), a wholly owned
subsidiary of AIG. Cash distributions on such preferred stock
are accounted for as interest expense.
(z) Fed Facility and Commercial Paper Funding
Facility: In 2008, AIG obtained funding under the
Fed Facility and the NY Feds Commercial Paper Funding
Facility (the CPFF). Amounts borrowed under the Fed Facility and
the CPFF are carried at the principal amount borrowed, and in
the case of the Fed Facility, also include accrued compounding
interest and fees.
(aa) Other Liabilities: Other liabilities
consist of other funds on deposit, and other payables. AIG has
entered into certain insurance and reinsurance contracts,
primarily in its General Insurance segment, that do not contain
sufficient insurance risk to be accounted for as insurance or
reinsurance. Accordingly, the premiums received on such
contracts, after deduction for certain related expenses, are
recorded as deposits within Other liabilities in the
consolidated balance sheet. Net proceeds of these deposits are
invested and generate net investment income. As amounts are
paid, consistent with the underlying contracts, the deposit
liability is reduced.
(bb) Minority Interest: Minority interest
liability includes the equity interest of outside shareholders
in AIGs consolidated subsidiaries and the preferred
shareholders equity in subsidiary companies relating to
outstanding preferred stock or interest of ILFC, a wholly owned
subsidiary of AIG. Cash distributions on such preferred stock or
interest are accounted for as interest expense.
At December 31, 2008, the preferred stock consisted of
1,000 shares of market auction preferred stock (MAPS) in
two series (Series A and B) of 500 shares each.
Each of the MAPS shares has a liquidation value of $100,000 per
share and is not convertible. The dividend rate, other than the
initial rate, for each dividend period for each series is reset
approximately every seven weeks (49 days) on the basis of
orders placed in an auction. During 2006, ILFC extended each of
the MAPS dividend periods for three years. At December 31,
2008, the dividend rate for Series A MAPS was
4.70 percent and the dividend rate for Series B MAPS
was 5.59 percent.
(cc) Contingent Liabilities: Amounts are
accrued for the resolution of claims that have either been
asserted or are deemed probable of assertion if, in the opinion
of management, it is both probable that a liability has been
incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably
estimated. In many cases, it is not possible to determine
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 215
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
whether a liability has been incurred or to estimate the
ultimate or minimum amount of that liability until years after
the contingency arises, in which case, no accrual is made until
that time.
(dd) Foreign Currency: Financial
statement accounts expressed in foreign currencies are
translated into U.S. dollars in accordance with
FAS 52, Foreign Currency Translation
(FAS 52). Under FAS 52, functional currency assets and
liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars generally
using rates of exchange prevailing at the balance sheet date of
each respective subsidiary and the related translation
adjustments are recorded as a separate component of Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss), net of any related taxes, in
consolidated shareholders equity. Functional currencies
are generally the currencies of the local operating environment.
Income statement accounts expressed in functional currencies are
translated using average exchange rates during the period. The
adjustments resulting from translation of financial statements
of foreign entities operating in highly inflationary economies
are recorded in income. Exchange gains and losses resulting from
foreign currency transactions are recorded in income.
(ee) Earnings (Loss) per Share: Basic
earnings or loss per share and diluted loss per share are based
on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding,
adjusted to reflect all stock dividends and stock splits.
Diluted earnings per share is based on those shares used in
basic earnings per share plus shares that would have been
outstanding assuming issuance of common shares for all dilutive
potential common shares outstanding, adjusted to reflect all
stock dividends and stock splits.
(ff) Recent Accounting Standards:
Accounting
Changes
AIG adopted the following accounting standards during 2006:
FAS 155
In February, 2006, the FASB issued FAS 155,
Accounting for Certain Hybrid Financial
Instruments an amendment of FAS 140 and
FAS 133 (FAS 155). FAS 155 allows AIG to
include changes in fair value in earnings on an
instrument-by-instrument
basis for any hybrid financial instrument that contains an
embedded derivative that would otherwise be required to be
bifurcated and accounted for separately under FAS 133. The
election to measure the hybrid instrument at fair value is
irrevocable at the acquisition or issuance date.
AIG elected to early adopt FAS 155 as of January 1,
2006, and apply FAS 155 fair value measurement to certain
structured note liabilities and structured investments in
AIGs available for sale portfolio that existed at
December 31, 2005. The effect of this adoption resulted in
an $11 million after-tax ($18 million pre-tax)
decrease to opening retained earnings as of January 1,
2006, representing the difference between the fair value of
these hybrid financial instruments and the prior carrying value
as of December 31, 2005. The effect of adoption on
after-tax gross gains and losses was $218 million
($336 million pre-tax) and $229 million
($354 million pre-tax), respectively.
In connection with AIGs early adoption of FAS 155,
structured note liabilities of $8.9 billion, other
structured liabilities in conjunction with equity derivative
transactions of $111 million, and hybrid financial
instruments of $522 million at December 31, 2006 are
now carried at fair value. The effect on earnings for 2006, for
changes in the fair value of hybrid financial instruments, was a
pre-tax loss of $313 million, of which $287 million
was reflected in Other income and was largely offset by gains on
economic hedge positions which were also reflected in operating
income, and $26 million was reflected in Net investment
income.
FAS 158
In September 2006, the FASB issued FAS 158,
Employers Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and
Other Postretirement Plans an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132R (FAS 158).
FAS 158 requires AIG to prospectively recognize the
overfunded or underfunded status of defined benefit
postretirement plans as an asset or liability in AIGs
consolidated balance sheet and to recognize changes in that
funded status in the year in which the changes occur through
Other comprehensive income. FAS 158 also requires AIG to
measure the
216 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
funded status of plans as of the date of its year-end balance
sheet, with limited exceptions. AIG adopted FAS 158 for the
year ended December 31, 2006. The cumulative effect, net of
deferred income taxes, on AIGs consolidated balance sheet
at December 31, 2006 was a net reduction in
shareholders equity through a charge to Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) of $532 million, with a
corresponding net decrease of $538 million in total assets,
and a net decrease of $6 million in total liabilities. See
Note 18 herein for additional information on the adoption
of FAS 158.
AIG adopted the following accounting standards during 2007:
SOP 05-1
In September 2005, the AICPA issued
SOP 05-1,
Accounting by Insurance Enterprises for Deferred
Acquisition Costs in Connection with Modifications or Exchanges
of Insurance Contracts
(SOP 05-1).
SOP 05-1
provides guidance on accounting for internal replacements of
insurance and investment contracts other than those specifically
described in FAS 97.
SOP 05-1
defines an internal replacement as a modification in product
benefits, features, rights, or coverage that occurs by the
exchange of a contract for a new contract, or by amendment,
endorsement, or rider to a contract, or by the election of a
feature or coverage within a contract. Internal replacements
that result in a substantially changed contract are accounted
for as a termination and a replacement contract.
SOP 05-1
became effective on January 1, 2007 and generally affects
the accounting for internal replacements occurring after that
date. In the first quarter of 2007, AIG recorded a cumulative
effect reduction of $82 million, net of tax, to the opening
balance of retained earnings on the date of adoption. This
adoption reflected changes in unamortized DAC, VOBA, deferred
sales inducement assets, unearned revenue liabilities and future
policy benefits for life and accident and health insurance
contracts resulting from a shorter expected life related to
certain group life and health insurance contracts and the effect
on the gross profits of investment-oriented products related to
previously anticipated future internal replacements. This
cumulative effect adjustment affected only the Life
Insurance & Retirement Services segment.
FIN 48
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109
(FIN 48), which clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in
income tax positions. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition
threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of an income tax position taken or
expected to be taken in a tax return. FIN 48 also provides
guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and
penalties, accounting in interim periods, and additional
disclosures. AIG adopted FIN 48 on January 1, 2007.
Upon adoption, AIG recognized a $71 million increase in the
liability for unrecognized tax benefits, which was accounted for
as a decrease to opening retained earnings as of January 1,
2007. See Note 21 for additional FIN 48 disclosures.
FSP
13-2
In July 2006, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. (FSP)
FAS 13-2,
Accounting for a Change or Projected Change in the Timing
of Cash Flows Relating to Income Taxes Generated by a Leveraged
Lease Transaction
(FSP 13-2).
FSP 13-2
addresses how a change or projected change in the timing of cash
flows relating to income taxes generated by a leveraged lease
transaction affects the accounting for the lease by the lessor,
and directs that the tax assumptions be consistent with any
FIN 48 uncertain tax position related to the lease. AIG
adopted
FSP 13-2
on January 1, 2007. Upon adoption, AIG recorded a
$50 million decrease in the opening balance of retained
earnings, net of tax, to reflect the cumulative effect of this
change in accounting.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 217
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
AIG adopted the following accounting standards during 2008:
FAS 157
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (FAS) No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (FAS 157). FAS 157 defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and
expands disclosure requirements regarding fair value
measurements but does not change existing guidance about whether
an asset or liability is carried at fair value. FAS 157
nullifies the guidance in
EITF 02-3
that precluded the recognition of a trading profit at the
inception of a derivative contract unless the fair value of such
contract was obtained from a quoted market price or other
valuation technique incorporating observable market data.
FAS 157 also clarifies that an issuers credit
standing should be considered when measuring liabilities at fair
value. The fair value measurement and related disclosure
guidance in FAS 157 do not apply to fair value measurements
associated with AIGs share-based employee compensation
awards accounted for in accordance with FAS 123(R),
Share-Based Payment.
AIG adopted FAS 157 on January 1, 2008, its required
effective date. FAS 157 must be applied prospectively,
except for certain stand-alone derivatives and hybrid
instruments initially measured using the guidance in
EITF 02-3,
which must be applied as a cumulative effect of change in
accounting principle to retained earnings at January 1,
2008. The cumulative effect, net of taxes, of adopting
FAS 157 on AIGs consolidated balance sheet was an
increase in retained earnings of $4 million.
The most significant effect of adopting FAS 157 on
AIGs consolidated results of operations for 2008 related
to changes in fair value methodologies with respect to both
liabilities already carried at fair value, primarily hybrid
notes and derivatives, and newly elected liabilities measured at
fair value (see FAS 159 discussion below). Specifically,
the incorporation of AIGs own credit spreads and the
incorporation of explicit risk margins (embedded policy
derivatives at transition only) resulted in a increase in
pre-tax loss of $1.8 billion ($1.2 billion after tax)
for 2008. The effects of the changes in AIGs own credit
spreads on pre-tax income for AIGFP was an increase of
$1.4 billion for 2008. The effect of the changes in
counterparty credit spreads for assets measured at fair value at
AIGFP was a decrease in pre-tax income of $10.7 billion for
2008.
See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional FAS 157 disclosures.
FAS 159
In February 2007, the FASB issued FAS 159, The Fair
Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities (FAS 159). FAS 159 permits entities
to choose to measure at fair value many financial instruments
and certain other items that are not required to be measured at
fair value. Subsequent changes in fair value for designated
items are required to be reported in income. FAS 159 also
establishes presentation and disclosure requirements for similar
types of assets and liabilities measured at fair value.
FAS 159 permits the fair value option election on an
instrument-by-instrument
basis for eligible items existing at the adoption date and at
initial recognition of an asset or liability, or upon most
events that give rise to a new basis of accounting for that
instrument.
AIG adopted FAS 159 on January 1, 2008, its required
effective date. The adoption of FAS 159 with respect to
elections made in the Life Insurance & Retirement
Services segment resulted in an after-tax decrease to 2008
opening retained earnings of $559 million. The adoption of
FAS 159 with respect to elections made by AIGFP resulted in
an after-tax decrease to 2008 opening retained earnings of
$448 million. Included in this amount are net unrealized
gains of $105 million that were reclassified to retained
earnings from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
related to available for sale securities recorded in the
consolidated balance sheet at January 1, 2008 for which the
fair value option was elected.
See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for
additional FAS 159 disclosures.
218 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
FAS 157
and FAS 159
The following table summarizes the after-tax increase
(decrease) from adopting FAS 157 and FAS 159 on the
opening shareholders equity accounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Accounting
|
|
At January 1, 2008
|
|
Income/(Loss)
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Changes
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
FAS 157
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
FAS 159
|
|
|
(105
|
)
|
|
|
(1,007
|
)
|
|
|
(1,112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles
|
|
$
|
(105
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,003
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,108
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FSP
FIN 39-1
In April 2007, the FASB issued FSP
FIN 39-1,
which modifies FASB Interpretation (FIN) No. 39,
Offsetting of Amounts Related to Certain Contracts,
and permits companies to offset cash collateral receivables or
payables against derivative instruments under certain
circumstances. AIG adopted the provisions of FSP
FIN 39-1
effective January 1, 2008, which requires retrospective
application to all prior periods presented. At December 31,
2008, the amounts of cash collateral received and posted that
were offset against net derivative positions totaled
$7.1 billion and $19.2 billion, respectively. The cash
collateral received and paid related to AIGFP derivative
instruments was previously recorded in both trade payables and
trade receivables. Cash collateral received related to non-AIGFP
derivative instruments was previously recorded in other
liabilities. Accordingly, the derivative assets and liabilities
at December 31, 2007 have been reduced by $6.3 billion
and $5.8 billion, respectively, related to the netting of
cash collateral.
FSP
FAS 133-1
and
FIN 45-4
In September 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. FAS 133-1
and
FIN 45-4,
Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain
Guarantees: An amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB
Interpretation No. 45 (FSP). The FSP amends
FAS 133 to require additional disclosures by sellers of
credit derivatives, including derivatives embedded in a hybrid
instrument. The FSP also amends FIN No. 45,
Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirement for
Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of
Others, to require an additional disclosure about
the current status of the payment/performance risk of a
guarantee. The additional disclosures are included in
Note 10 herein.
FSP
FAS 157-3
In October 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 157-3,
Determining the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the
Market for That Asset Is Not Active (FSP
FAS 157-3).
FSP
FAS 157-3
provides guidance clarifying certain aspects of FAS 157
with respect to the fair value measurements of a security when
the market for that security is inactive. AIG adopted this
guidance in the third quarter of 2008. The effects of adopting
FSP
FAS 157-3
on AIGs consolidated financial condition and results of
operations were not material.
FSP
FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 140-4
and FIN 46(R)-8. Disclosures by Public Entities
(Enterprises) about Transfers of Financial Assets and Interests
in Variable Interest Entities (FSP). The FSP amends and
expands the disclosure requirements regarding transfers of
financial assets and a companys involvement with variable
interest entities. The FSP is effective for interim and annual
periods ending after December 15, 2008. Adoption of the FSP
did not affect AIGs financial condition, results of
operations or cash flow, as only additional disclosures were
required. The additional disclosures are included in Note 9
herein.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 219
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
FSP
EITF
99-20-1
In January 2009, the FASB issued FSP
EITF 99-20-1,
Amendments to the Impairment Guidance of EITF Issue
No. 99-20
(FSP
EITF 99-20-1).
FSP
EITF 99-20-1
amends the impairment guidance in EITF Issue
No. 99-20,
Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased
Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to
Be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets,
to achieve more consistent determination of whether an
other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. The FSP also
retains and emphasizes the objective of an other-than-temporary
impairment assessment and the related disclosure requirements in
FASB Statement No. 115, Accounting for Certain
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities and other
related guidance. AIG adopted this guidance in the fourth
quarter of 2008. The effects of adopting FSP
EITF 99-20-1
on AIGs consolidated financial condition and results of
operations were not material.
Future
Application of Accounting Standards
FAS 141(R)
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS 141 (revised 2007),
Business Combinations (FAS 141(R)).
FAS 141(R) changes the accounting for business combinations
in a number of ways, including broadening the transactions or
events that are considered business combinations; requiring an
acquirer to recognize 100 percent of the fair value of
assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling (i.e.,
minority) interests; recognizing contingent consideration
arrangements at their acquisition-date fair values with
subsequent changes in fair value generally reflected in income;
and recognizing preacquisition loss and gain contingencies at
their acquisition-date fair values, among other changes.
AIG adopted FAS 141(R) for business combinations for which
the acquisition date is on or after January 1, 2009.
AIGs adoption of this guidance does not have a material
effect on the Companys consolidated financial position or
results of operations, but may have an effect on the accounting
for future business combinations, if any, as well as the
assessment of goodwill impairments in the future.
FAS 160
In December 2007, the FASB issued FAS 160,
Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an Amendment of ARB No. 51
(FAS 160). FAS 160 requires noncontrolling (i.e.,
minority) interests in partially owned consolidated subsidiaries
to be classified in the consolidated balance sheet as a separate
component of consolidated shareholders equity, or in the
mezzanine section of the balance sheet (between liabilities and
equity), to the extent such interests do not qualify as
permanent equity in accordance with EITF
Topic D-98,
Classification and Measurement of Redeemable
Securities (revised September 2008). FAS 160 also
establishes accounting rules for subsequent acquisitions and
sales of noncontrolling interests and provides for how
noncontrolling interests should be presented in the consolidated
statement of income. The noncontrolling interests share of
subsidiary income should be reported as a part of consolidated
net income with disclosure of the attribution of consolidated
net income to the controlling and noncontrolling interests on
the face of the consolidated statement of income.
AIG adopted FAS 160 on January 1, 2009, its required
effective date. FAS 160 must be adopted prospectively,
except that consolidated net income would be recast to include
net income attributable to both the controlling and
noncontrolling interests retrospectively and minority interest
balance sheet reclassifications are to be made retrospectively,
as discussed below. Effective with AIGs first quarter 2009
Form 10-Q,
AIG will retrospectively reclassify a portion of the minority
interest liability of $10.0 billion at December 31,
2008 (and prior periods) to a separate component of shareholders
equity, titled Non-controlling interest, to the extent it
qualifies to be reported in shareholders equity. The
remaining portion will be reclassified to the mezzanine section
of the balance sheet.
FAS 161
In March 2008, the FASB issued FAS 161, Disclosures
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133
(FAS 161). FAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures about
(a) how and why AIG uses derivative instruments,
(b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items
220 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
are accounted for under FAS No. 133 and its related
interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and
related hedged items affect AIGs consolidated financial
condition, results of operations, and cash flows. FAS 161
is effective for AIG beginning with financial statements issued
in the first quarter of 2009. Because FAS 161 only requires
additional disclosures about derivatives, it will have no effect
on AIGs consolidated financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
FAS 162
In May 2008, the FASB issued FAS 162, The Hierarchy
of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
(FAS 162). FAS 162 identifies the sources of
accounting principles and the framework for selecting the
principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements
presented in conformity with GAAP but does not change current
practices. FAS 162 will become effective on the
60th day following Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board
amendments to remove GAAP hierarchy from the auditing standards.
FAS 162 will have no effect on AIGs consolidated
financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
FSP
FAS 140-3
In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP
No. FAS 140-3,
Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and
Repurchase Financing Transactions (FSP
FAS 140-3).
FSP
FAS 140-3
requires an initial transfer of a financial asset and a
repurchase financing that was entered into contemporaneously
with or in contemplation of the initial transfer to be evaluated
as a linked transaction unless certain criteria are met. FSP
FAS 140-3
is effective for AIG beginning January 1, 2009 and will be
applied to new transactions entered into from that date forward.
Early adoption is prohibited. AIG is currently assessing the
effect that adopting FSP
FAS 140-3
will have on its consolidated financial statements but does not
believe the effect will be material.
FSP
FAS 132(R)-1
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1,
Employers Disclosures about Postretirement Benefit
Plan Assets (FSP FAS 132(R)-1). FSP FAS 132(R)-1
amends FAS 132(R) to require more detailed disclosures
about an employers plan assets, including the
employers investment strategies, major categories of plan
assets, concentrations of risk within plan assets, and valuation
techniques used to measure the fair values of plan assets. FSP
FAS 132(R)-1 is effective for fiscal years ending after
December 15, 2009.
EITF
07-5
In June 2008, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by the
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) on Issue
No. 07-5,
Determining Whether an Instrument (or Embedded Feature) is
Indexed to an Entitys Own Stock. Following the
January 1, 2009 adoption date, instruments that are not
indexed to the issuers stock would not qualify for an
exception from derivative accounting provided in FAS 133
(which requires that an instrument is both indexed to the
issuers own stock, and that it is classified in equity).
AIG is assessing the effect that adopting
EITF 07-5
will have on its consolidated financial statements, but does not
believe the effect will be material.
As described in Note 1 herein, AIG commenced an
organization-wide restructuring plan under which some of its
businesses will be divested, some will be held for later
divestiture, and some businesses will be prepared for potential
subsequent offerings to the public.
Successful execution of the restructuring plan involves
significant separation activities. Accordingly, AIG established
retention programs for its key employees to maintain ongoing
business operations and to facilitate the successful execution
of the restructuring plan. Additionally, given the market
disruption in the first quarter of 2008, AIGFP established a
retention plan for its employees to manage and unwind its
complex businesses. Other major activities include the
separation of shared services, infrastructure and assets among
business units and corporate functions.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 221
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
At December 31, 2008, AIG cannot determine the expected
date of completion or reliably estimate the total aggregate
expenses expected to be incurred for all AIGs
restructuring and separation activities. This is due to the
significant scale of the restructuring plan, the fact that
restructuring costs will vary depending on the identity of the
ultimate purchasers of the divested entities, as well as the
extended period over which the restructuring is expected to
occur. For those activities that can be reasonably estimated,
the total restructuring and separation expenses expected to be
incurred is $1.9 billion at December 31, 2008.
Restructuring expenses and related asset impairment and other
expenses, for the year ended December 31, 2008, by
operating segment consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Amount
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
Separation
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected
|
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
to be Incurred *
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
General Insurance
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
139
|
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
|
564
|
|
Asset Management
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
Other
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
724
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
307
|
|
|
$
|
451
|
|
|
$
|
758
|
|
|
$
|
1,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes cumulative amounts incurred and additional future
amounts to be incurred that can be reasonably estimated at the
balance sheet date. |
The initial restructuring liability and the corresponding
movement from inception, for the year ended December 31,
2008, are summarized as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
Severance
|
|
|
Termination
|
|
|
Write-
|
|
|
Exit
|
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
Separation
|
|
|
and Separation
|
|
|
|
Expenses(a)
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Downs
|
|
|
Expenses(b)
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Expenses(c)
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Liability balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts charged to expense
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
|
451
|
|
|
|
758
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(167
|
)
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
Non-cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability balance, end of year
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
$
|
284
|
|
|
$
|
475
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amount expected to be incurred(d)
|
|
$
|
164
|
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
585
|
|
|
$
|
906
|
|
|
$
|
1,031
|
|
|
$
|
1,937
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Restructuring expenses include $44 million of retention
awards and Total amount expected to be incurred includes
$57 million for retention awards for employees expected to
be terminated. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Primarily includes consulting and other professional fees
related to (i) asset disposition activities,
(ii) AIGs debt and capital restructuring program with
the NY Fed and the United States Department of the Treasury and
(iii) unwinding most of AIGFPs businesses and
portfolios. |
|
(c) |
|
Restructuring expenses include $448 million of retention
awards and Total amount expected to be incurred includes
$1.0 billion for key employee retention awards announced
during 2008. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes cumulative amounts incurred and additional future
amounts to be incurred that can be reasonably estimated at the
balance sheet date. |
222 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
AIG identifies its operating segments by product line consistent
with its management structure and evaluates their performance
based on operating income (loss) before taxes. These segments
and their respective operations are as follows:
General Insurance: AIGs General
Insurance subsidiaries write substantially all lines of
commercial property and casualty insurance and various personal
lines both domestically and abroad. Revenues in the General
Insurance segment represent General Insurance net Premiums and
other considerations earned, Net investment income and Net
realized capital gains (losses). AIGs principal General
Insurance operations are as follows:
Commercial Insurance writes substantially all classes of
business insurance in the U.S. and Canada, accepting such
business mainly from insurance brokers.
Transatlantic Holdings, Inc. (Transatlantic) subsidiaries offer
reinsurance on both a treaty and facultative basis to insurers
in the U.S. and abroad. Transatlantic structures programs
for a full range of property and casualty products with an
emphasis on specialty risks.
AIGs Personal Lines operations provide automobile
insurance through 21st.com and the Agency Auto Division, as well
as a broad range of coverages for high net worth individuals
through the AIG Private Client Group.
Mortgage Guaranty operations provide residential mortgage
guaranty insurance that covers the first loss for credit
defaults on high
loan-to-value
conventional first- and second-lien mortgages for the purchase
or refinance of one to four family residences. Effective
September 30, 2008 Mortgage Guaranty ceased insuring new
second-lien mortgages.
AIGs Foreign General Insurance group accepts risks
primarily underwritten through a network of branches and foreign
based insurance subsidiaries. The Foreign General Insurance
group uses various marketing methods to write both business and
consumer lines insurance with certain refinements for local
laws, customs and needs. AIU operates in Asia, the Pacific Rim,
Europe, including the United Kingdom, Africa, the Middle East
and Latin America.
Each of the General Insurance
sub-segments
is comprised of groupings of major products and services as
follows: Commercial Insurance is comprised of domestic
commercial insurance products and services; Transatlantic is
comprised of reinsurance products and services sold to other
general insurance companies; Personal Lines is comprised of
general insurance products and services sold to individuals;
Mortgage Guaranty is comprised of products insuring against
losses arising under certain loan agreements; and Foreign
General is comprised of general insurance products sold overseas.
Life Insurance & Retirement
Services: AIGs Life Insurance &
Retirement Services subsidiaries offer a wide range of insurance
and retirement savings products both domestically and abroad.
Insurance-oriented products consist of individual and group
life, payout annuities (including structured settlements),
endowment and accident and health policies. Retirement savings
products consist generally of fixed and variable annuities.
Revenues in the Life Insurance & Retirement Services
segment represent Life Insurance & Retirement Services
Premiums and other considerations, Net investment income and Net
realized capital gains (losses).
AIGs principal Foreign Life Insurance &
Retirement Services operations are American Life Insurance
Company (ALICO), American International Assurance Company,
Limited, together with American International Assurance Company
(Bermuda) Limited (AIA), Nan Shan Life Insurance Company, Ltd.
(Nan Shan), The Philippine American Life and General Insurance
Company (Philamlife), AIG Edison Life Insurance Company (AIG
Edison Life) and AIG Star Life Insurance Co. Ltd. (AIG Star
Life).
AIGs principal Domestic Life Insurance and Domestic
Retirement Services operations are American General Life
Insurance Company (AG Life), The United States Life Insurance
Company in the City of New York (USLIFE), American General Life
and Accident Insurance Company (AGLA and, collectively with AG
Life and USLIFE, the Domestic Life Insurance internal reporting
unit), AIG Annuity Insurance Company (AIG Annuity), The Variable
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 223
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Annuity Life Insurance Company (VALIC) and AIG Retirement
Services, Inc (AIG SunAmerica and, collectively with AIG Annuity
and VALIC, the Domestic Retirement Services internal reporting
unit).
American International Reinsurance Company Limited (AIRCO) acts
primarily as an internal reinsurance company for AIGs
insurance operations.
Life Insurance & Retirement Services is comprised of
two major groupings of products and services: insurance-oriented
products and services and retirement savings products and
services.
Financial Services: AIGs Financial
Services subsidiaries engage in diversified activities including
aircraft leasing, capital markets, consumer finance and
insurance premium finance. Together, the Aircraft Leasing,
Capital Markets and Consumer Finance operations generate the
majority of the revenues produced by the Financial Services
operations. A.I. Credit also contributes to Financial Services
income principally by providing insurance premium financing for
both AIGs policyholders and those of other insurers.
AIGs Aircraft Leasing operations represent the operations
of ILFC, which generates its revenues primarily from leasing new
and used commercial jet aircraft to foreign and domestic
airlines. Revenues also result from the remarketing of
commercial jet aircraft for ILFCs own account, and
remarketing and fleet management services for airlines and
financial institutions.
Capital Markets represents the operations of AIGFP, which
engaged as principal in a wide variety of financial
transactions, including standard and customized financial
products involving commodities, credit, currencies, energy,
equities and interest rates. AIGFP also invests in a diversified
portfolio of securities and principal investments and engages in
borrowing activities that involve issuing standard and
structured notes and other securities and entering into GIAs.
Given the extreme market conditions experienced in 2008,
downgrades of AIGs credit ratings by the rating agencies,
as well as AIGs intent to refocus on its core businesses,
AIGFP has begun to unwind its businesses and portfolios
including those associated with credit protection written
through credit default swaps on super senior risk tranches of
diversified pools of loans and debt securities.
Historically, AIGs Capital Markets operations derived a
significant portion of their revenues from hedged financial
positions entered into in connection with counterparty
transactions. AIGFP has also participated as a dealer in a wide
variety of financial derivatives transactions. Revenues and
operating income of the Capital Markets operations and the
percentage change in these amounts for any given period are
significantly affected by changes in the fair value of
AIGFPs assets and liabilities and by the number, size and
profitability of transactions entered into during that period
relative to those entered into during the comparative period.
AIGs Consumer Finance operations in North America are
principally conducted through AGF. AGF derives most of its
revenues from finance charges assessed on real estate loans,
secured and unsecured non-real estate loans and retail sales
finance receivables. During 2008, AGF ceased its wholesale
originations (originations through mortgage brokers).
AIGs foreign consumer finance operations are principally
conducted through AIGCFG. AIGCFG operates primarily in emerging
and developing markets. AIGCFG has operations in Argentina,
China, Brazil, Hong Kong, Mexico, the Philippines, Poland,
Taiwan, Thailand, India and Colombia.
Asset Management: AIGs Asset Management
operations comprise a wide variety of investment-related
services and investment products. Such services and products are
offered to individuals, pension funds and institutions globally
through AIGs Spread-Based Investment business,
Institutional Asset Management, and Brokerage Services and
Mutual Funds business. Revenues in the Asset Management segment
represent investment income with respect to spread-based
products and management, advisory and incentive fees.
Other Operations: AIGs Other operations
include interest expense, restructuring costs, expenses of
corporate staff not attributable to specific business segments,
expenses related to efforts to improve internal controls,
corporate initiatives, certain compensation plan expenses and
the settlement costs more fully described in Note 14(a) to
the Consolidated Financial Statements.
224 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
AIGs operations by operating segment were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance &
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
Asset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Management
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues*
|
|
$
|
44,676
|
|
|
$
|
3,054
|
|
|
$
|
(31,095
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,526
|
)
|
|
$
|
(81
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,028
|
|
|
$
|
(924
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,104
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
3,365
|
|
|
|
712
|
|
|
|
13,323
|
|
|
|
17,411
|
|
|
|
(393
|
)
|
|
|
17,018
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairment charges
|
|
|
4,533
|
|
|
|
38,731
|
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
7,276
|
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
|
50,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,805
|
|
Operating loss before minority interest*
|
|
|
(5,746
|
)
|
|
|
(37,446
|
)
|
|
|
(40,821
|
)
|
|
|
(9,187
|
)
|
|
|
(15,055
|
)
|
|
|
(108,255
|
)
|
|
|
(506
|
)
|
|
|
(108,761
|
)
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
3,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,207
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
695
|
|
|
|
3,501
|
|
|
|
1,381
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
|
|
6,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,141
|
|
Year-end identifiable assets
|
|
$
|
165,947
|
|
|
$
|
489,646
|
|
|
$
|
167,061
|
|
|
$
|
46,850
|
|
|
$
|
168,762
|
|
|
$
|
1,038,266
|
|
|
$
|
(177,848
|
)
|
|
$
|
860,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
51,708
|
|
|
$
|
53,570
|
|
|
$
|
(1,309
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,625
|
|
|
$
|
457
|
|
|
$
|
110,051
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
110,064
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
|
7,794
|
|
|
|
567
|
|
|
|
1,580
|
|
|
|
10,098
|
|
|
|
(410
|
)
|
|
|
9,688
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairment charges
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
2,798
|
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
4,715
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,715
|
|
Operating income (loss) before minority interest
|
|
|
10,526
|
|
|
|
8,186
|
|
|
|
(9,515
|
)
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
|
|
(2,140
|
)
|
|
|
8,221
|
|
|
|
722
|
|
|
|
8,943
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
|
|
2,790
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,790
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
4,569
|
|
|
|
3,557
|
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
|
9,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,283
|
|
Year-end identifiable assets
|
|
$
|
181,708
|
|
|
$
|
613,161
|
|
|
$
|
193,975
|
|
|
$
|
77,274
|
|
|
$
|
126,874
|
|
|
$
|
1,192,992
|
|
|
$
|
(144,631
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,048,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
49,206
|
|
|
$
|
50,878
|
|
|
$
|
7,777
|
|
|
$
|
4,543
|
|
|
$
|
483
|
|
|
$
|
112,887
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
113,387
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
6,005
|
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
7,276
|
|
|
|
(325
|
)
|
|
|
6,951
|
|
Other-than-temporary
impairment charges
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
|
641
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
225
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
944
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
944
|
|
Operating income (loss) before minority interest
|
|
|
10,412
|
|
|
|
10,121
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
1,538
|
|
|
|
(1,435
|
)
|
|
|
21,019
|
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
21,687
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
1,655
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
2,374
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,374
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
6,278
|
|
|
|
835
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
8,443
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,443
|
|
Year-end identifiable assets
|
|
$
|
167,004
|
|
|
$
|
550,957
|
|
|
$
|
202,485
|
|
|
$
|
78,275
|
|
|
$
|
107,517
|
|
|
$
|
1,106,238
|
|
|
$
|
(126,828
|
)
|
|
$
|
979,410
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
To better align financial
reporting with the manner in which AIGs chief operating
decision maker manages the business, AIGs own credit risk
valuation adjustments on intercompany transactions, the
recognition of which began in 2008, are excluded from segment
revenues and operating income. In addition, goodwill impairment
charges totaling $1.1 billion that were recorded on AIG
Parents books have been included herein for segment
reporting purposes. |
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 225
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
AIGs General Insurance operations by major internal
reporting unit were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Insurance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personal
|
|
|
Mortgage
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
Reportable
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
General
|
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Transatlantic
|
|
|
Lines
|
|
|
Guaranty
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
20,841
|
|
|
$
|
4,079
|
|
|
$
|
4,848
|
|
|
$
|
1,228
|
|
|
$
|
13,658
|
|
|
$
|
44,654
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
44,676
|
|
Claims and claims adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expenses incurred
|
|
|
17,915
|
|
|
|
2,907
|
|
|
|
3,633
|
|
|
|
3,264
|
|
|
|
7,838
|
|
|
|
35,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,557
|
|
Underwriting expenses
|
|
|
5,991
|
|
|
|
1,233
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
5,202
|
|
|
|
14,865
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,865
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
(3,065
|
)
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
(785
|
)
|
|
|
(2,475
|
)
|
|
|
618
|
|
|
|
(5,768
|
)
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
(5,746
|
)
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
380
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
261
|
|
Year-end identifiable assets
|
|
$
|
107,458
|
|
|
$
|
13,376
|
|
|
$
|
5,304
|
|
|
$
|
6,561
|
|
|
$
|
39,037
|
|
|
$
|
171,736
|
|
|
$
|
(5,789
|
)
|
|
$
|
165,947
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
27,653
|
|
|
$
|
4,382
|
|
|
$
|
4,924
|
|
|
$
|
1,041
|
|
|
$
|
13,715
|
|
|
$
|
51,715
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
51,708
|
|
Claims and claims adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expenses incurred
|
|
|
15,948
|
|
|
|
2,638
|
|
|
|
3,660
|
|
|
|
1,493
|
|
|
|
6,243
|
|
|
|
29,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29,982
|
|
Underwriting expenses
|
|
|
4,400
|
|
|
|
1,083
|
|
|
|
1,197
|
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
|
4,335
|
|
|
|
11,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,200
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
7,305
|
|
|
|
661
|
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
(637
|
)
|
|
|
3,137
|
|
|
|
10,533
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
10,526
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
354
|
|
Year-end identifiable assets
|
|
$
|
112,675
|
|
|
$
|
15,484
|
|
|
$
|
5,930
|
|
|
$
|
4,550
|
|
|
$
|
48,728
|
|
|
$
|
187,367
|
|
|
$
|
(5,659
|
)
|
|
$
|
181,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
27,419
|
|
|
$
|
4,050
|
|
|
$
|
4,871
|
|
|
$
|
877
|
|
|
$
|
11,999
|
|
|
$
|
49,216
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
49,206
|
|
Claims and claims adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
expenses incurred
|
|
|
16,779
|
|
|
|
2,463
|
|
|
|
3,306
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
5,155
|
|
|
|
28,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28,052
|
|
Underwriting expenses
|
|
|
4,795
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
1,133
|
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
3,616
|
|
|
|
10,742
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,742
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
5,845
|
|
|
|
589
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
|
|
328
|
|
|
|
3,228
|
|
|
|
10,422
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
10,412
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
375
|
|
Year-end identifiable assets
|
|
$
|
104,866
|
|
|
$
|
14,268
|
|
|
$
|
5,391
|
|
|
$
|
3,604
|
|
|
$
|
43,879
|
|
|
$
|
172,008
|
|
|
$
|
(5,004
|
)
|
|
$
|
167,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
226 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
AIGs Life Insurance & Retirement Services
operations by major internal reporting unit were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
|
|
Foreign Life
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Life
|
|
|
|
Insurance &
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Insurance &
|
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
Reportable
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Retirement
|
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Insurance
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance-oriented products
|
|
$
|
22,137
|
|
|
$
|
(3,743
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,394
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,394
|
|
Retirement savings products
|
|
|
(2,042
|
)
|
|
|
2,222
|
|
|
|
(15,520
|
)
|
|
|
(15,340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(15,340
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
20,095
|
|
|
|
(1,521
|
)
|
|
|
(15,520
|
)
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
(6,337
|
)
|
|
|
(10,238
|
)
|
|
|
(20,871
|
)
|
|
|
(37,446
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37,446
|
)
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
439
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
595
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
|
695
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
695
|
|
Year-end identifiable assets
|
|
$
|
271,867
|
|
|
$
|
97,773
|
|
|
$
|
137,471
|
|
|
$
|
507,111
|
|
|
$
|
(17,465
|
)
|
|
$
|
489,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance-oriented products
|
|
$
|
34,289
|
|
|
$
|
8,535
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,824
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,824
|
|
Retirement savings products
|
|
|
3,974
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
|
|
6,279
|
|
|
|
10,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,746
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
38,263
|
|
|
|
9,028
|
|
|
|
6,279
|
|
|
|
53,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,570
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
6,197
|
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
|
1,347
|
|
|
|
8,186
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,186
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
398
|
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
532
|
|
Year-end identifiable assets
|
|
$
|
309,934
|
|
|
$
|
108,908
|
|
|
$
|
201,216
|
|
|
$
|
620,058
|
|
|
$
|
(6,897
|
)
|
|
$
|
613,161
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance-oriented products
|
|
$
|
31,022
|
|
|
$
|
8,538
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
39,560
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
39,560
|
|
Retirement savings products
|
|
|
3,609
|
|
|
|
568
|
|
|
|
7,141
|
|
|
|
11,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
|
34,631
|
|
|
|
9,106
|
|
|
|
7,141
|
|
|
|
50,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50,878
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income
|
|
|
6,881
|
|
|
|
917
|
|
|
|
2,323
|
|
|
|
10,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,121
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
268
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
711
|
|
Year-end identifiable assets
|
|
$
|
261,259
|
|
|
$
|
103,624
|
|
|
$
|
192,885
|
|
|
$
|
557,768
|
|
|
$
|
(6,811
|
)
|
|
$
|
550,957
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 227
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
AIGs Financial Services operations by major internal
reporting unit were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Consolidation
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Aircraft
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Consumer
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reportable
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
Financial
|
|
|
|
Leasing
|
|
|
Markets
|
|
|
Finance
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Segment
|
|
|
Elimination
|
|
|
Services
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
5,075
|
|
|
$
|
(40,333
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,849
|
|
|
$
|
323
|
|
|
$
|
(31,086
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(31,095
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,567
|
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
3,365
|
|
Operating income*
|
|
|
1,116
|
|
|
|
(40,471
|
)
|
|
|
(1,261
|
)
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
(40,821
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(40,821
|
)
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
1,879
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,976
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
3,231
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
|
3,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,501
|
|
Year-end identifiable assets
|
|
$
|
47,426
|
|
|
$
|
77,846
|
|
|
$
|
34,525
|
|
|
$
|
(2,354
|
)
|
|
$
|
157,443
|
|
|
$
|
9,618
|
|
|
$
|
167,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
4,694
|
|
|
$
|
(9,979
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,655
|
|
|
$
|
1,471
|
|
|
$
|
(159
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,150
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,309
|
)
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,650
|
|
|
|
4,644
|
|
|
|
1,437
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
|
7,794
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,794
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
873
|
|
|
|
(10,557
|
)
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(9,515
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,515
|
)
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
1,751
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,831
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
4,164
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
322
|
|
|
|
4,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,569
|
|
Year-end identifiable assets
|
|
$
|
44,970
|
|
|
$
|
105,568
|
|
|
$
|
36,822
|
|
|
$
|
17,357
|
|
|
$
|
204,717
|
|
|
$
|
(10,742
|
)
|
|
$
|
193,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
4,082
|
|
|
$
|
(186
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,587
|
|
|
$
|
320
|
|
|
$
|
7,803
|
|
|
$
|
(26
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,777
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
|
|
3,215
|
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
|
|
108
|
|
|
|
6,068
|
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
6,005
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
578
|
|
|
|
(873
|
)
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
1,655
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,655
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
6,012
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
|
199
|
|
|
|
6,278
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,278
|
|
Year-end identifiable assets
|
|
$
|
41,975
|
|
|
$
|
121,243
|
|
|
$
|
32,702
|
|
|
$
|
12,368
|
|
|
$
|
208,288
|
|
|
$
|
(5,803
|
)
|
|
$
|
202,485
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes $1.4 billion of intercompany interest expense
and $803 million of increase to fair value which are
eliminated in AIGs consolidation. |
228 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
AIGs
Asset Management operations consist of a single internal
reporting unit.
AIGs operations by major geographic segment were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Geographic Segments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Domestic(a)
|
|
|
Far East
|
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
(33,301
|
)
|
|
$
|
25,022
|
|
|
$
|
19,383
|
|
|
$
|
11,104
|
|
Real estate and other fixed assets, net of accumulated
depreciation
|
|
|
3,224
|
|
|
|
1,552
|
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
|
5,566
|
|
Flight equipment primarily under operating leases, net of
accumulated depreciation(b)
|
|
$
|
43,395
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,395
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
46,402
|
|
|
$
|
36,512
|
|
|
$
|
27,150
|
|
|
$
|
110,064
|
|
Real estate and other fixed assets, net of accumulated
depreciation
|
|
|
3,202
|
|
|
|
1,404
|
|
|
|
912
|
|
|
|
5,518
|
|
Flight equipment primarily under operating leases, net of
accumulated depreciation(b)
|
|
$
|
41,984
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
41,984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues
|
|
$
|
57,984
|
|
|
$
|
33,883
|
|
|
$
|
21,520
|
|
|
$
|
113,387
|
|
Real estate and other fixed assets, net of accumulated
depreciation
|
|
|
2,432
|
|
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
|
867
|
|
|
|
4,381
|
|
Flight equipment primarily under operating leases, net of
accumulated depreciation(b)
|
|
$
|
39,875
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
39,875
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Including revenues from insurance operations in Canada of
$1.4 billion, $1.3 billion and $1.1 billion in
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Revenues are generally
recorded based on the geographic location of the reporting
unit. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
ILFC derives more than 90 percent of its revenue from
foreign-operated airlines. |
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 229
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
4.
|
Fair
Value Measurements
|
Effective January 1, 2008, AIG adopted FAS 157 and
FAS 159, which specify measurement and disclosure standards
related to assets and liabilities measured at fair value. See
Note 1 herein for additional information.
The most significant effect of adopting FAS 157 on
AIGs results of operations for 2008 related to changes in
fair value methodologies with respect to both liabilities
already carried at fair value, primarily hybrid notes and
derivatives, and newly elected liabilities measured at fair
value (see FAS 159 discussion below). Specifically, the
incorporation of AIGs own credit spreads and the
incorporation of explicit risk margins (embedded policy
derivatives at transition only) to reflect the risk of
AIGs non-performance resulted in an increase of
$1.8 billion to pre-tax income ($1.2 billion after
tax) for 2008, as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Pre-Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (Decrease)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
|
Liabilities Carried
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
at Fair Value
|
|
Business Segment Affected
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income statement caption:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized capital losses
|
|
$
|
542
|
|
|
Freestanding
derivatives
|
|
All segments excluding AIGFP
|
|
|
|
(155
|
)
|
|
Embedded policy derivatives
|
|
Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
Unrealized market valuation losses on AIGFP super senior credit
default swap portfolio
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
Super senior credit default swap portfolio
|
|
AIGFP
|
Other income
|
|
|
1,209
|
|
|
Notes, GIAs, derivatives, other liabilities
|
|
AIGFP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pre-tax increase
|
|
$
|
1,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities already carried at fair value
|
|
$
|
1,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
Newly elected liabilities measured at fair value (FAS 159
elected)
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net pre-tax increase
|
|
$
|
1,781
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements on a Recurring Basis
AIG measures at fair value on a recurring basis financial
instruments in its trading and available for sale securities
portfolios, certain mortgage and other loans receivable, certain
spot commodities, derivative assets and liabilities, securities
purchased (sold) under agreements to resell (repurchase),
securities lending invested collateral, non-traded equity
investments and certain private limited partnerships and certain
hedge funds included in other invested assets, certain
short-term investments, separate and variable account assets,
certain policyholder contract deposits, securities and spot
commodities sold but not yet purchased, certain trust deposits
and deposits due to banks and other depositors, certain
long-term debt, and certain hybrid financial instruments
included in other liabilities. The fair value of a financial
instrument is the amount that would be received on sale of an
asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date.
The degree of judgment used in measuring the fair value of
financial instruments generally correlates with the level of
pricing observability. Financial instruments with quoted prices
in active markets generally have more pricing observability and
less judgment is used in measuring fair value. Conversely,
financial instruments traded in
other-than-active
markets or that do not have quoted prices have less
observability and are measured at fair value using valuation
models or other pricing techniques that require more judgment.
An active market is one in which transactions for the asset or
liability being valued occur with sufficient frequency and
volume to provide pricing
230 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
information on an ongoing basis. An
other-than-active
market is one in which there are few transactions, the prices
are not current, price quotations vary substantially either over
time or among market makers, or in which little information is
released publicly for the asset or liability being valued.
Pricing observability is affected by a number of factors,
including the type of financial instrument, whether the
financial instrument is new to the market and not yet
established, the characteristics specific to the transaction and
general market conditions.
Fair
Value Hierarchy
Beginning January 1, 2008, assets and liabilities recorded
at fair value in the consolidated balance sheet are measured and
classified in a hierarchy for disclosure purposes consisting of
three levels based on the observability of inputs
available in the marketplace used to measure the fair values as
discussed below:
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1: Fair value measurements that are
quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets that AIG has the
ability to access for identical assets or liabilities. Market
price data generally is obtained from exchange or dealer
markets. AIG does not adjust the quoted price for such
instruments. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis and classified as Level 1 include certain
government and agency securities, actively traded listed common
stocks and derivative contracts, most separate account assets
and most mutual funds.
|
|
|
|
Level 2: Fair value measurements based on
inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that
are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or
indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar
assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than
quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability,
such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at
commonly quoted intervals. Assets and liabilities measured at
fair value on a recurring basis and classified as Level 2
generally include certain government securities, most
investment-grade and high-yield corporate bonds, certain ABS,
certain listed equities, state, municipal and provincial
obligations, hybrid securities, mutual fund and hedge fund
investments, derivative contracts, GIAs at AIGFP and physical
commodities.
|
|
|
|
Level 3: Fair value measurements based on
valuation techniques that use significant inputs that are
unobservable. These measurements include circumstances in which
there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or
liability. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair
value may fall into different levels of the fair value
hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy
within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls is
determined based on the lowest level input that is significant
to the fair value measurement in its entirety. AIGs
assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair
value measurement in its entirety requires judgment. In making
the assessment, AIG considers factors specific to the asset or
liability. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis and classified as Level 3 include certain
distressed ABS, structured credit products, certain derivative
contracts (including AIGFPs super senior credit default
swap portfolio), policyholder contract deposits carried at fair
value, private equity and real estate fund investments, and
direct private equity investments. AIGs
non-financial-instrument assets that are measured at fair value
on a non-recurring basis generally are classified as
Level 3.
|
The following is a description of the valuation methodologies
used for instruments carried at fair value:
Incorporation
of Credit Risk in Fair Value Measurements
|
|
|
|
|
AIGs Own Credit Risk. Fair value
measurements for AIGFPs debt, GIAs, structured note
liabilities and freestanding derivatives incorporate AIGs
own credit risk by determining the explicit cost for each
counterparty to protect against its net credit exposure to AIG
at the balance sheet date by reference to observable AIG credit
default swap spreads. A counterpartys net credit exposure
to AIG is determined based on master netting agreements, when
applicable, which take into consideration all positions with
AIG, as well as collateral posted by AIG with the counterparty
at the balance sheet date.
|
Fair value measurements for embedded policy derivatives and
policyholder contract deposits take into consideration that
policyholder liabilities are senior in priority to general
creditors of AIG and therefore are much less sensitive to
changes in AIG credit default swap or cash issuance spreads.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 231
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty Credit Risk. Fair value
measurements for freestanding derivatives incorporate
counterparty credit by determining the explicit cost for AIG to
protect against its net credit exposure to each counterparty at
the balance sheet date by reference to observable counterparty
credit default swap spreads. AIGs net credit exposure to a
counterparty is determined based on master netting agreements,
which take into consideration all derivative positions with the
counterparty, as well as cash collateral posted by the
counterparty at the balance sheet date.
|
Fair values for fixed maturity securities based on observable
market prices for identical or similar instruments implicitly
include the incorporation of counterparty credit risk. Fair
values for fixed maturity securities based on internal models
incorporate counterparty credit risk by using discount rates
that take into consideration cash issuance spreads for similar
instruments or other observable information.
Fixed
Maturity Securities Trading and Available for
Sale
AIG maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use
of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Whenever
available, AIG obtains quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets at the balance sheet date to measure at fair
value fixed maturity securities in its trading and available for
sale portfolios. Market price data generally is obtained from
exchange or dealer markets.
AIG estimates the fair value of fixed maturity securities not
traded in active markets, including securities purchased (sold)
under agreements to resell (repurchase), and mortgage and other
loans receivable for which AIG elected the fair value option, by
referring to traded securities with similar attributes, using
dealer quotations, a matrix pricing methodology, discounted cash
flow analyses or internal valuation models. This methodology
considers such factors as the issuers industry, the
securitys rating and tenor, its coupon rate, its position
in the capital structure of the issuer, yield curves, credit
curves, prepayment rates and other relevant factors. For fixed
maturity instruments that are not traded in active markets or
that are subject to transfer restrictions, valuations are
adjusted to reflect illiquidity
and/or
non-transferability, and such adjustments generally are based on
available market evidence. In the absence of such evidence,
managements best estimate is used.
ML II
and ML III
At their inception, AIGs economic interests in ML II
and membership interests in ML III (Maiden Lane Interests)
were valued at the transaction prices of $1 billion and
$5 billion, respectively. Subsequently, Maiden Lane
Interests are valued using a discounted cash flow methodology
that uses the estimated future cash flows of the assets to which
the Maiden Lane Interests are entitled and the discount rates
applicable to such interests as derived from the fair value of
the entire asset pool. The implicit discount rates are
calibrated to the changes in the estimated asset values for the
underlying assets commensurate with AIGs interests in the
capital structure of the respective entities. Estimated cash
flows and discount rates used in the valuations are validated,
to the extent possible, using market observable information for
securities with similar asset pools, structure and terms.
Valuation Sensitivity: The fair values of the Maiden
Lane Interests are most affected by changes in the discount
rates and changes in the underlying estimated future collateral
cash flow assumptions used in the valuation model.
The benchmark LIBOR interest rate curve changes are determined
by macroeconomic considerations and financial sector credit
spreads. The spreads over LIBOR for the Maiden Lane Interests
(including collateral-specific credit and liquidity spreads) can
change as a result of changes in market expectations about the
future performance of these investments as well as changes in
the risk premium that market participants would demand at the
time of the transactions.
Changes in estimated future cash flows would primarily be the
result of changes in expectations for collateral defaults,
recoveries, and underlying loan prepayments.
232 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Increases in the discount rate or decreases in estimated future
cash flows used in the valuation would decrease AIGs
estimate of the fair value of the Maiden Lane Interests as shown
in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Change
|
|
|
|
ML II
|
|
|
ML III
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in millions)
|
|
|
Discount Rates
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 basis point increase
|
|
$
|
(87
|
)
|
|
$
|
(596
|
)
|
400 basis point increase
|
|
|
(164
|
)
|
|
|
(1,098
|
)
|
|
|
Estimated Future Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10% decrease
|
|
|
(316
|
)
|
|
|
(881
|
)
|
20% decrease
|
|
|
(595
|
)
|
|
|
(1,668
|
)
|
|
|
AIG believes that the ranges of discount rates used in these
analyses are reasonable based on implied spread volatilities of
similar collateral securities and implied volatilities of LIBOR
interest rates. The ranges of estimated future cash flows were
determined based on variability in estimated future cash flows
implied by cumulative loss estimates for similar instruments.
The fair values of the Maiden Lane Interests are likely to vary,
perhaps materially, from the amount estimated.
Equity
Securities Traded in Active Markets Trading and
Available for Sale
AIG maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use
of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Whenever
available, AIG obtains quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets at the balance sheet date to measure at fair
value marketable equity securities in its trading and available
for sale portfolios. Market price data generally is obtained
from exchange or dealer markets.
Non-Traded
Equity Investments Other Invested
Assets
AIG initially estimates the fair value of equity instruments not
traded in active markets by reference to the transaction price.
This valuation is adjusted only when changes to inputs and
assumptions are corroborated by evidence such as transactions in
similar instruments, completed or pending third-party
transactions in the underlying investment or comparable
entities, subsequent rounds of financing, recapitalizations and
other transactions across the capital structure, offerings in
the equity capital markets, and changes in financial ratios or
cash flows. For equity securities that are not traded in active
markets or that are subject to transfer restrictions, valuations
are adjusted to reflect illiquidity
and/or
non-transferability and such adjustments generally are based on
available market evidence. In the absence of such evidence,
managements best estimate is used.
Private
Limited Partnership and Hedge Fund Investments
Other Invested Assets
AIG initially estimates the fair value of investments in certain
private limited partnerships and certain hedge funds by
reference to the transaction price. Subsequently, AIG obtains
the fair value of these investments generally from net asset
value information provided by the general partner or manager of
the investments, the financial statements of which generally are
audited annually. AIG considers observable market data and
performs diligence procedures in validating the appropriateness
of using the net asset value as a fair value measurement.
Separate
Account Assets
Separate account assets are composed primarily of registered and
unregistered open-end mutual funds that generally trade daily
and are measured at fair value in the manner discussed above for
equity securities traded in active markets.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 233
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Freestanding
Derivatives
Derivative assets and liabilities can be exchange-traded or
traded over the counter (OTC). AIG generally values
exchange-traded derivatives using quoted prices in active
markets for identical derivatives at the balance sheet date.
OTC derivatives are valued using market transactions and other
market evidence whenever possible, including market-based inputs
to models, model calibration to market clearing transactions,
broker or dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources with
reasonable levels of price transparency. When models are used,
the selection of a particular model to value an OTC derivative
depends on the contractual terms of, and specific risks inherent
in, the instrument as well as the availability of pricing
information in the market. AIG generally uses similar models to
value similar instruments. Valuation models require a variety of
inputs, including contractual terms, market prices and rates,
yield curves, credit curves, measures of volatility, prepayment
rates and correlations of such inputs. For OTC derivatives that
trade in liquid markets, such as generic forwards, swaps and
options, model inputs can generally be corroborated by
observable market data by correlation or other means, and model
selection does not involve significant management judgment.
Certain OTC derivatives trade in less liquid markets with
limited pricing information, and the determination of fair value
for these derivatives is inherently more difficult. When AIG
does not have corroborating market evidence to support
significant model inputs and cannot verify the model to market
transactions, the transaction price is initially used as the
best estimate of fair value. Accordingly, when a pricing model
is used to value such an instrument, the model is adjusted so
the model value at inception equals the transaction price.
Subsequent to initial recognition, AIG updates valuation inputs
when corroborated by evidence such as similar market
transactions, third-party pricing services
and/or
broker or dealer quotations, or other empirical market data.
When appropriate, valuations are adjusted for various factors
such as liquidity, bid/offer spreads and credit considerations.
Such adjustments are generally based on available market
evidence. In the absence of such evidence, managements
best estimate is used.
Embedded
Policy Derivatives
The fair value of embedded policy derivatives contained in
certain variable annuity and equity-indexed annuity and life
contracts is measured based on actuarial and capital market
assumptions related to projected cash flows over the expected
lives of the contracts. These cash flow estimates primarily
include benefits and related fees assessed, when applicable, and
incorporate expectations about policyholder behavior. Estimates
of future policyholder behavior are subjective and based
primarily on AIGs historical experience. With respect to
embedded policy derivatives in AIGs variable annuity
contracts, because of the dynamic and complex nature of the
expected cash flows, risk neutral valuations are used.
Estimating the underlying cash flows for these products involves
many estimates and judgments, including those regarding expected
market rates of return, market volatility, correlations of
market index returns to funds, fund performance, discount rates
and policyholder behavior. With respect to embedded policy
derivatives in AIGs equity-indexed annuity and life
contracts, option pricing models are used to estimate fair
value, taking into account assumptions for future equity index
growth rates, volatility of the equity index, future interest
rates, and determinations on adjusting the participation rate
and the cap on equity indexed credited rates in light of market
conditions and policyholder behavior assumptions. With the
adoption of FAS 157, these methodologies were not changed,
with the exception of incorporating an explicit risk margin to
take into consideration market participant estimates of
projected cash flows and policyholder behavior. The valuation
technique used to measure the fair value of certain variable
annuity guarantees was modified during 2008, primarily with
respect to the development of long-dated equity volatility
assumptions and the discount rates applied to certain projected
benefit payments.
AIGFPs
Super Senior Credit Default Swap Portfolio
AIGFP values its credit default swaps written on the super
senior risk layers of designated pools of debt securities or
loans using internal valuation models, third-party price
estimates and market indices. The principal market was
determined to be the market in which super senior credit default
swaps of this type and size would be
234 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
transacted, or have been transacted, with the greatest volume or
level of activity. AIG has determined that the principal market
participants, therefore, would consist of other large financial
institutions who participate in sophisticated
over-the-counter
derivatives markets. The specific valuation methodologies vary
based on the nature of the referenced obligations and
availability of market prices.
The valuation of the super senior credit derivatives continues
to be challenging given the limitation on the availability of
market observable information due to the lack of trading and
price transparency in the structured finance market,
particularly during and since the second half of 2007. These
market conditions have increased the reliance on management
estimates and judgments in arriving at an estimate of fair value
for financial reporting purposes. Further, disparities in the
valuation methodologies employed by market participants and the
varying judgments reached by such participants when assessing
volatile markets have increased the likelihood that the various
parties to these instruments may arrive at significantly
different estimates as to their fair values.
AIGFPs valuation methodologies for the super senior credit
default swap portfolio have evolved in response to the
deteriorating market conditions and the lack of sufficient
market observable information. AIG has sought to calibrate the
model to available market information and to review the
assumptions of the model on a regular basis.
In the case of credit default swaps written to facilitate
regulatory capital relief, AIGFP estimates the fair value of
these derivatives by considering observable market transactions.
The transactions with the most observability are the early
terminations of these transactions by counterparties. AIG
expects that the majority of these transactions will be
terminated within the next 15 months by AIGFPs
counterparties. During 2008, $99.7 billion in net notional
amount of regulatory capital super senior transactions was
terminated or matured. AIGFP has also received formal
termination notices for an additional $26.5 billion in net
notional amount of regulatory capital super senior CDS
transactions with effective termination dates in 2009. AIGFP has
not been required to make any payments as part of these
terminations and in certain cases was paid a fee upon
termination. AIGFP also considers other market data, to the
extent relevant and available.
AIGFP uses a modified version of the Binomial Expansion
Technique (BET) model to value its credit default swap portfolio
written on super senior tranches of multi-sector collateralized
debt obligations (CDOs) of asset-backed securities (ABS),
including maturity-shortening puts that allow the holders of the
securities issued by certain CDOs to treat the securities as
short-term eligible
2a-7
investments under the Investment Company Act of 1940
(2a-7 Puts).
The BET model was developed in 1996 by a major rating agency to
generate expected loss estimates for CDO tranches and derive a
credit rating for those tranches, and has been widely used ever
since.
AIGFP has adapted the BET model to estimate the price of the
super senior risk layer or tranche of the CDO. AIG modified the
BET model to imply default probabilities from market prices for
the underlying securities and not from rating agency
assumptions. To generate the estimate, the model uses the price
estimates for the securities comprising the portfolio of a CDO
as an input and converts those estimates to credit spreads over
current LIBOR-based interest rates. These credit spreads are
used to determine implied probabilities of default and expected
losses on the underlying securities. This data is then
aggregated and used to estimate the expected cash flows of the
super senior tranche of the CDO.
Prices for the individual securities held by a CDO are obtained
in most cases from the CDO collateral managers, to the extent
available. For the year ended December 31, 2008, CDO
collateral managers provided market prices for 61.2 percent
of the underlying securities. When a price for an individual
security is not provided by a CDO collateral manager, AIGFP
derives the price through a pricing matrix using prices from CDO
collateral managers for similar securities. Matrix pricing is a
mathematical technique used principally to value debt securities
without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific
securities, but rather by relying on the relationship of the
security to other benchmark quoted securities. Substantially all
of the CDO collateral managers who provided prices used dealer
prices for all or part of the underlying securities, in some
cases supplemented by third-party pricing services.
The BET model also uses diversity scores, weighted average
lives, recovery rates and discount rates.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 235
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
AIGFP employs a Monte Carlo simulation to assist in quantifying
the effect on the valuation of the CDO of the unique aspects of
the CDOs structure such as triggers that divert cash flows
to the most senior part of the capital structure. The Monte
Carlo simulation is used to determine whether an underlying
security defaults in a given simulation scenario and, if it
does, the securitys implied random default time and
expected loss. This information is used to project cash flow
streams and to determine the expected losses of the portfolio.
In addition to calculating an estimate of the fair value of the
super senior CDO security referenced in the credit default swaps
using its internal model, AIGFP also considers the price
estimates for the super senior CDO securities provided by third
parties, including counterparties to these transactions, to
validate the results of the model and to determine the best
available estimate of fair value. In determining the fair value
of the super senior CDO security referenced in the credit
default swaps, AIGFP uses a consistent process which considers
all available pricing data points and eliminates the use of
outlying data points. When pricing data points are within a
reasonable range an averaging technique is applied.
In the case of credit default swaps written on portfolios of
investment-grade corporate debt, AIGFP estimates the fair value
of its obligations by comparing the contractual premium of each
contract to the current market levels of the senior tranches of
comparable credit indices, the iTraxx index for European
corporate issuances and the CDX index for U.S. corporate
issuances. These indices are considered reasonable proxies for
the referenced portfolios. In addition, AIGFP compares these
valuations to third-party prices and makes adjustments as
necessary to determine the best available estimate of fair value.
AIGFP estimates the fair value of its obligations resulting from
credit default swaps written on CLOs to be equivalent to the par
value less the current market value of the referenced
obligation. Accordingly, the value is determined by obtaining
third-party quotes on the underlying super senior tranches
referenced under the credit default swap contract.
Policyholder
Contract Deposits
Policyholder contract deposits accounted for at fair value
beginning January 1, 2008 are measured using an income
approach by taking into consideration the following factors:
|
|
|
|
|
Current policyholder account values and related surrender
charges;
|
|
|
|
The present value of estimated future cash inflows (policy fees)
and outflows (benefits and maintenance expenses) associated with
the product using risk neutral valuations, incorporating
expectations about policyholder behavior, market returns and
other factors; and
|
|
|
|
A risk margin that market participants would require for a
market return and the uncertainty inherent in the model inputs.
|
The change in fair value of these policyholder contract deposits
is recorded as policyholder benefits and claims incurred in the
consolidated statement of income (loss).
Spot
commodities and Securities and spot commodities sold but not yet
purchased
Fair values of spot commodities and spot commodities sold but
not yet purchased are based on current market prices of
reference spot futures contracts traded on exchanges. Fair
values for securities sold but not yet purchased are based on
current market prices.
236 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Assets
and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring
Basis
The following table presents information about assets and
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and
indicates the level of the fair value measurement based on the
levels of the inputs used:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Netting(a)
|
|
|
Collateral(b)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds available for sale
|
|
$
|
414
|
|
|
$
|
344,237
|
|
|
$
|
18,391
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
363,042
|
|
Bond trading securities
|
|
|
781
|
|
|
|
29,480
|
|
|
|
6,987
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37,248
|
|
Securities lending invested collateral(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,966
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,401
|
|
Common and preferred stocks available for sale
|
|
|
7,282
|
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,808
|
|
Common and preferred stocks trading
|
|
|
11,199
|
|
|
|
1,133
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,335
|
|
Mortgage and other loans receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
Other invested assets(d)
|
|
|
1,853
|
|
|
|
6,175
|
|
|
|
11,168
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,196
|
|
Unrealized gain on swaps, options and forward transactions
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
90,998
|
|
|
|
3,865
|
|
|
|
(74,217
|
)
|
|
|
(7,096
|
)
|
|
|
13,773
|
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
3,247
|
|
|
|
16,069
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19,316
|
|
Separate account assets
|
|
|
47,902
|
|
|
|
2,410
|
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
51,142
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
72,901
|
|
|
$
|
499,018
|
|
|
$
|
42,115
|
|
|
$
|
(74,217
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,096
|
)
|
|
$
|
532,721
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policyholder contract deposits
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,458
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,458
|
|
Other policyholder funds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,423
|
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,508
|
|
Securities and spot commodities sold but not yet purchased
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
|
|
1,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,693
|
|
Unrealized loss on swaps, options and forward
transactions(e)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
85,255
|
|
|
|
14,435
|
|
|
|
(74,217
|
)
|
|
|
(19,236
|
)
|
|
|
6,238
|
|
Trust deposits and deposits due to banks and other depositors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,802
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,802
|
|
Other long-term debt
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,448
|
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,595
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,355
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,125
|
|
|
$
|
114,882
|
|
|
$
|
21,125
|
|
|
$
|
(74,217
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,236
|
)
|
|
$
|
43,679
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents netting of derivative exposures covered by a
qualifying master netting agreement in accordance with
FIN 39. |
|
(b) |
|
Represents cash collateral posted and received. |
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 237
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(c) |
|
Amounts exclude short-term investments that are carried at
cost, which approximates fair value of $443 million. |
|
(d) |
|
Approximately 14.6 percent of the fair value of the assets
recorded as Level 3 relates to various private equity, real
estate, hedge fund and fund-of-funds which are consolidated by
AIG. AIGs ownership in these funds represented 27.6
percent, or $1.7 billion of the Level 3 amount. |
|
(e) |
|
Included in Level 3 is the fair value derivative
liability of $9.0 billion on AIGFP super senior credit
default swap portfolio. |
At December 31, 2008, Level 3 assets were
4.9 percent of total assets, and Level 3 liabilities
were 2.6 percent of total liabilities.
The following tables present changes during 2008 in
Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a
recurring basis, and the realized and unrealized gains (losses)
recorded in income during 2008 related to the Level 3
assets and liabilities that remained in the consolidated balance
sheet at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Gains
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Losses) on
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Purchases,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instruments
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Gains (Losses)
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Sales,
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
|
Held at
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Included
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Issuances and
|
|
|
Transfers
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
of Year(a)
|
|
|
in Income(b)
|
|
|
Income (Loss)
|
|
|
Settlements-net
|
|
|
In (Out)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds available for sale
|
|
$
|
19,071
|
|
|
$
|
(5,968
|
)
|
|
$
|
(653
|
)
|
|
$
|
803
|
|
|
$
|
5,138
|
|
|
$
|
18,391
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Bond trading securities
|
|
|
4,563
|
|
|
|
(3,905
|
)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
6,268
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
6,987
|
|
|
|
(2,468
|
)
|
Securities lending invested collateral
|
|
|
11,353
|
|
|
|
(6,667
|
)
|
|
|
1,668
|
|
|
|
(11,732
|
)
|
|
|
5,813
|
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common and preferred stocks available for sale
|
|
|
359
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
|
|
(173
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common and preferred stocks trading
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Mortgage and other loans receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other invested assets
|
|
|
10,373
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
|
|
1,042
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
11,168
|
|
|
|
991
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Separate account assets
|
|
|
1,003
|
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
|
(221
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
46,893
|
|
|
$
|
(16,666
|
)
|
|
$
|
581
|
|
|
$
|
(3,597
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,039
|
|
|
$
|
38,250
|
|
|
$
|
(1,687
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policyholder contract deposits
|
|
$
|
(3,674
|
)
|
|
$
|
(986
|
)
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
(803
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(5,458
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,163
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(82
|
)
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on swaps, options and forward transactions, net
|
|
|
(11,710
|
)
|
|
|
(26,824
|
)
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
27,956
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
(10,570
|
)
|
|
|
(177
|
)
|
Other long-term debt
|
|
|
(3,578
|
)
|
|
|
730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,309
|
|
|
|
392
|
|
|
|
(1,147
|
)
|
|
|
(126
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
(511
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(19,681
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27,097
|
)
|
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
28,891
|
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
|
$
|
(17,260
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Total Level 3 derivative exposures have been netted on
these tables for presentation purposes only. |
238 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Net realized and unrealized gains and losses shown above are
reported in the consolidated statement of income (loss)
primarily as follows: |
|
|
|
|
|
Major Category of Assets/Liabilities
|
|
Consolidated Statement of Income (Loss) Line Items
|
|
Financial Services assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
Other income
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized market valuation losses on AIGFP super senior credit
default swap portfolio
|
Securities lending invested collateral
|
|
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses)
|
Other invested assets
|
|
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses)
|
Policyholder contract deposits
|
|
|
|
Policyholder benefits and claims incurred
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses)
|
Both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine
the fair values of positions classified in Level 3 in the
tables above. As a result, the unrealized gains (losses) on
instruments held at December 31, 2008 may include
changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable
(e.g., changes in market interest rates) and unobservable inputs
(e.g., changes in unobservable long-dated volatilities).
AIG uses various hedging techniques to manage risks associated
with certain positions, including those classified within
Level 3. Such techniques may include the purchase or sale
of financial instruments that are classified within Level 1
and/or
Level 2. As a result, the realized and unrealized gains
(losses) for assets and liabilities classified within
Level 3 presented in the table above do not reflect the
related realized or unrealized gains (losses) on hedging
instruments that are classified within Level 1
and/or
Level 2.
Changes in the fair value of separate and variable account
assets are completely offset in the consolidated statement of
income (loss) by changes in separate and variable account
liabilities, which are not carried at fair value and therefore
not included in the tables above.
Fair
Value Measurements on a Non-Recurring Basis
AIG also measures the fair value of certain assets on a
non-recurring basis, generally quarterly, annually, or when
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying
amount of the assets may not be recoverable. These assets
include held to maturity securities (in periods prior to the
third quarter of 2008), cost and equity-method investments, life
settlement contracts, flight equipment, collateral securing
foreclosed loans and real estate and other fixed assets,
goodwill, and other intangible assets. AIG uses a variety of
techniques to measure the fair value of these assets when
appropriate, as described below:
|
|
|
|
|
Cost and Equity-Method Investments: When AIG
determines that the carrying value of these assets may not be
recoverable, AIG records the assets at fair value with the loss
recognized in income. In such cases, AIG measures the fair value
of these assets using the techniques discussed in Fair Value
Measurements on a Recurring Basis Fair Value
Hierarchy, above, for fixed maturities and equity securities.
|
|
|
|
Life Settlement Contracts: AIG measures the
fair value of individual life settlement contracts (which are
included in other invested assets) whenever the carrying value
plus the undiscounted future costs that are expected to be
incurred to keep the life settlement contract in force exceed
the expected proceeds from the contract. In those situations,
the fair value is determined on a discounted cash flow basis,
incorporating current life expectancy assumptions. The discount
rate incorporates current information about market interest
rates, the credit exposure to the insurance company that issued
the life settlement contract and AIGs estimate of the risk
margin an investor in the contracts would require.
|
|
|
|
Flight Equipment Primarily Under Operating
Leases: When AIG determines the carrying value of
its commercial aircraft may not be recoverable, AIG records the
aircraft at fair value with the loss recognized in income. AIG
measures the fair value of its commercial aircraft using an
income approach based on the present value of all cash flows
from existing and projected lease payments (based on historical
experience and current expectations regarding market
participants) including net contingent rentals for the period
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 239
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
extending to the end of the aircrafts economic life in its
highest and best use configuration, plus its disposition value.
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral Securing Foreclosed Loans and Real Estate and
Other Fixed Assets: When AIG takes collateral in
connection with foreclosed loans, AIG generally bases its
estimate of fair value on the price that would be received in a
current transaction to sell the asset by itself.
|
|
|
|
Goodwill: AIG tests goodwill for impairment
whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying amount of goodwill may not be recoverable, but at least
annually. When AIG determines goodwill may be impaired, AIG uses
techniques including discounted expected future cash flows,
appraisals, or, in the case of reporting units being considered
for sale, third-party indications of fair value, if available.
|
|
|
|
Long-Lived Assets: AIG tests its long-lived
assets for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate the carrying amount of a long-lived asset
may not be recoverable. AIG measures the fair value of
long-lived assets based on an in-use premise that considers the
same factors used to estimate the fair value of its real estate
and other fixed assets under an in-use premise discussed above.
|
See Notes 1(c), (d), (e), and (s) herein for
additional information about how AIG tests various asset classes
for impairment.
Assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis on
which impairment charges were recorded were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,085
|
|
Real estate owned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
|
|
242
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,122
|
|
|
|
3,137
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
1,160
|
|
|
|
1,189
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
5,661
|
|
|
$
|
5,705
|
|
|
$
|
4,699
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG recognized goodwill impairment charges of $4.1 billion
in 2008, which were primarily related to the General Insurance,
Domestic Life Insurance and Domestic Retirement Services,
Consumer Finance and the Capital Markets businesses. At
December 31, 2008, the carrying value of remaining goodwill
in the General Insurance, Life Insurance & Retirement
Services and Asset Management operating segments totaled
$1.3 billion, $4.4 billion and $1.3 billion,
respectively.
AIG recognized an impairment charge on certain investment real
estate and other long-lived assets of $614 million for
2008, which was included in other income. As required by
FAS 157, the fair value disclosed in the table above is
unadjusted for transaction costs. The amounts recorded on the
consolidated balance sheet are net of transaction costs.
Fair
Value Option
FAS 159 permits a company to choose to measure at fair
value many financial instruments and certain other assets and
liabilities that are not required to be measured at fair value.
Subsequent changes in fair value for designated items are
required to be reported in income. Unrealized gains and losses
on financial instruments in AIGs insurance businesses and
in AIGFP for which the fair value option was elected under
FAS 159 are classified in policyholder benefits and claims
incurred and in other income, respectively, in the consolidated
statement of income (loss).
240 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table presents the gains or losses recorded
during 2008 related to the eligible instruments for which AIG
elected the fair value option and the related transition
adjustment recorded as a decrease to opening shareholders
equity at January 1, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
Transition
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
Gain (Loss)
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
Prior to
|
|
|
Upon
|
|
|
After
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Adoption
|
|
|
Adoption(a)
|
|
|
Adoption
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Mortgage and other loans receivable
|
|
$
|
1,109
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,109
|
|
|
$
|
(82
|
)
|
Trading securities (formerly available for sale)
|
|
|
39,278
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
39,283
|
|
|
|
(8,663
|
)
|
Trading ML II and ML III
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,116
|
)
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
|
|
|
20,950
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
20,951
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
Other invested assets
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
320
|
|
|
|
(39
|
)
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
6,969
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,969
|
|
|
|
68
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
1,147
|
|
|
|
(1,147
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
|
(435
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future policy benefits for life, accident and health insurance
contracts
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
299
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policyholder contract deposits(b)
|
|
|
3,739
|
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
|
3,379
|
|
|
|
1,314
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
6,750
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
6,760
|
|
|
|
(125
|
)
|
Securities and spot commodities sold but not yet purchased
|
|
|
3,797
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
3,807
|
|
|
|
(176
|
)
|
Trust deposits and deposits due to banks and other depositors
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
198
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
57,968
|
|
|
|
(675
|
)
|
|
|
58,643
|
|
|
|
(4,041
|
)
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
1,792
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,792
|
|
|
|
1,210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total gain (loss) for the year ended December 31,
2008(c)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(11,051
|
)
|
Pre-tax cumulative effect of adopting the fair value option
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,638
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
526
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cumulative effect of adopting the fair value option
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(1,112
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Effective January 1, 2008, AIGFP elected to apply the
fair value option under FAS 159 to all eligible assets and
liabilities (other than equity method investments, trade
receivables and trade payables) because electing the fair value
option allows AIGFP to more closely align its results with the
economics of its transactions by recognizing concurrently
through earnings the change in fair value of its derivatives and
the offsetting change in fair value of the assets and
liabilities being hedged as well as the manner in which the
business is evaluated by management. Substantially all of the
gain (loss) amounts shown above are reported in other income on
the consolidated statement of income (loss). In August 2008,
AIGFP modified prospectively this election as management
believes it is appropriate to exclude from the automatic
election for securities purchased in connection with existing
structured credit transactions and their related funding
obligations. AIGFP will evaluate whether to elect the fair value
option on a
case-by-case
basis for securities purchased in connection with existing
structured credit transactions and their related funding
obligations. |
|
(b) |
|
AIG elected to apply the fair value option to certain single
premium variable life products in Japan and an investment-linked
life insurance product sold principally in Asia, both classified
within policyholder contract deposits in the consolidated
balance sheet. AIG elected the fair value option for these
liabilities to more closely align its accounting with the
economics of its transactions. For the investment-linked product
sold principally in |
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 241
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
Asia, the election more effectively aligns changes in the
fair value of assets with a commensurate change in the fair
value of policyholders liabilities. For the single premium
life products in Japan, the fair value option election allows
AIG to economically hedge the inherent market risks associated
with this business in an efficient and effective manner through
the use of derivative instruments. The hedging program, which
was completely implemented in the third quarter of 2008, results
in an accounting presentation for this business that more
closely reflects the underlying economics and the way the
business is managed, with the change in the fair value of
derivatives and underlying assets largely offsetting the change
in fair value of the policy liabilities. AIG did not elect the
fair value option for other liabilities classified in
policyholder contract deposits because other contracts do not
share the same contract features that created the disparity
between the accounting presentation and the economic
performance. |
|
(c) |
|
Not included in the table above were losses of
$44.6 billion for the year ended December 31, 2008,
that were primarily due to changes in the fair value of
derivatives, trading securities and certain other invested
assets for which the fair value option under FAS 159 was
not elected. Included in this amount were unrealized market
valuation losses of $28.6 billion for the year ended
December 31, 2008, related to AIGFPs super senior
credit default swap portfolio. |
Interest income and expense and dividend income on assets and
liabilities elected under the fair value option are recognized
and classified in the consolidated statement of income (loss)
depending on the nature of the instrument and related market
conventions. For AIGFP related activity, interest, dividend
income, and interest expense are included in other income.
Otherwise, interest and dividend income are included in net
investment income in the consolidated statement of income
(loss). See Note 1(a) herein for additional information
about AIGs policies for recognition, measurement, and
disclosure of interest and dividend income and interest expense.
During 2008, AIG recognized a gain of $84 million,
attributable to the observable effect of changes in credit
spreads on AIGs own liabilities for which the fair value
option was elected. AIG calculates the effect of these credit
spread changes using discounted cash flow techniques that
incorporate current market interest rates, AIGs observable
credit spreads on these liabilities and other factors that
mitigate the risk of nonperformance such as collateral posted.
The following table presents the difference between fair
values and the aggregate contractual principal amounts of
mortgage and other loans receivable and long-term debt, for
which the fair value option was elected:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Principal Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Due Upon Maturity
|
|
|
Difference
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage and other loans receivable
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
$
|
244
|
|
|
$
|
(113
|
)
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
$
|
21,285
|
|
|
$
|
16,827
|
|
|
$
|
4,458
|
|
At December 31, 2008, there were no mortgage and other
loans receivable for which the fair value option was elected,
that were 90 days or more past due and in non-accrual
status.
Fair
Value Information about Financial Instruments Not Measured at
Fair Value
FAS 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments (FAS 107), requires disclosure of fair
value information about financial instruments for which it is
practicable to estimate such fair value. FAS 107 excludes
certain financial instruments, including those related to
insurance contracts and lease contracts.
Information regarding the estimation of fair value for financial
instruments not carried at fair value is discussed below:
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage and other loans receivable: Fair
values of loans on real estate and collateral loans were
estimated for disclosure purposes using discounted cash flow
calculations based upon discount rates that
|
242 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
AIG believes market participants would use in determining the
price they would pay for such assets. For certain loans,
AIGs current incremental lending rates for similar type
loans is used as the discount rate, as it is believed that this
rate approximates the rates market participants would use. The
fair values of policy loans were not estimated as AIG believes
it would have to expend excessive costs for the benefits derived.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance receivables: Fair values were
estimated for disclosure purposes using discounted cash flow
calculations based upon the weighted average rates currently
being offered in the marketplace for similar finance receivables.
|
|
|
|
Securities lending invested collateral and securities lending
payable: Securities lending collateral are
floating rate fixed maturity securities recorded at fair value.
Fair values were based upon quoted market prices or internally
developed models consistent with the methodology for other fixed
maturity securities. The contract values of securities lending
payable approximate fair value as these obligations are
short-term in nature.
|
|
|
|
Cash, short-term investments, trade receivables, trade
payables, securities purchased (sold) under agreements to resell
(repurchase), and commercial paper and extendible commercial
notes: The carrying values of these assets and
liabilities approximate fair values because of the relatively
short period of time between origination and expected
realization.
|
|
|
|
Policyholder contract deposits associated with
investment-type contracts: Fair values for
policyholder contract deposits associated with investment-type
contracts not accounted for at fair value were estimated for
disclosure purposes using discounted cash flow calculations
based upon interest rates currently being offered for similar
contracts with maturities consistent with those remaining for
the contracts being valued. Where no similar contracts are being
offered, the discount rate is the appropriate tenor swap rates
(if available) or current risk-free interest rates consistent
with the currency in which the cash flows are denominated.
|
|
|
|
Trust deposits and deposits due to banks and other
depositors: The fair values of certificates of
deposit which mature in more than one year are estimated for
disclosure purposes using discounted cash flow calculations
based upon interest rates currently offered for deposits with
similar maturities. For demand deposits and certificates of
deposit which mature in less than one year, carrying values
approximate fair value.
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt: Fair values of these
obligations were estimated for disclosure purposes using
discounted cash flow calculations based upon AIGs current
incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowings with
maturities consistent with those remaining for the debt being
valued.
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 243
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table presents the carrying value and estimated
fair value of AIGs financial instruments as required by
FAS 107:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Value(a)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Value(a)
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities
|
|
$
|
404,134
|
|
|
$
|
404,134
|
|
|
$
|
545,176
|
|
|
$
|
545,752
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
21,143
|
|
|
|
21,143
|
|
|
|
45,569
|
|
|
|
45,569
|
|
Mortgage and other loans receivable
|
|
|
34,687
|
|
|
|
35,056
|
|
|
|
33,727
|
|
|
|
34,123
|
|
Finance receivables, net of allowance
|
|
|
30,949
|
|
|
|
28,731
|
|
|
|
31,234
|
|
|
|
28,693
|
|
Other invested assets(b)
|
|
|
50,381
|
|
|
|
51,622
|
|
|
|
57,788
|
|
|
|
58,633
|
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
|
|
20,950
|
|
|
|
20,950
|
|
Short-term investments
|
|
|
46,666
|
|
|
|
46,666
|
|
|
|
51,351
|
|
|
|
51,351
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
8,642
|
|
|
|
8,642
|
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
Unrealized gain on swaps, options and forward transactions
|
|
|
13,773
|
|
|
|
13,773
|
|
|
|
14,104
|
|
|
|
14,104
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
|
|
672
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policyholder contract deposits associated with
investment-type contracts
|
|
|
179,478
|
|
|
|
176,783
|
|
|
|
211,987
|
|
|
|
211,698
|
|
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
|
|
|
5,262
|
|
|
|
5,262
|
|
|
|
8,331
|
|
|
|
9,048
|
|
Trade payables
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
977
|
|
|
|
6,445
|
|
|
|
6,445
|
|
Securities and spot commodities sold but not yet purchased
|
|
|
2,693
|
|
|
|
2,693
|
|
|
|
4,709
|
|
|
|
4,709
|
|
Unrealized loss on swaps, options and forward transactions
|
|
|
6,238
|
|
|
|
6,238
|
|
|
|
18,031
|
|
|
|
18,031
|
|
Trust deposits and deposits due to banks and other depositors
|
|
|
4,498
|
|
|
|
4,469
|
|
|
|
4,903
|
|
|
|
4,986
|
|
Commercial paper and extendible commercial notes
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
13,114
|
|
|
|
13,114
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank of New York commercial paper funding
facility
|
|
|
15,105
|
|
|
|
15,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank of New York credit facility
|
|
|
40,431
|
|
|
|
40,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term debt
|
|
|
137,054
|
|
|
|
101,467
|
|
|
|
162,935
|
|
|
|
165,064
|
|
Securities lending payable
|
|
|
2,879
|
|
|
|
2,879
|
|
|
|
81,965
|
|
|
|
81,965
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The carrying value of all other financial instruments
approximates fair value. |
|
(b) |
|
Excludes aircraft asset investments held by non-Financial
Services subsidiaries. |
244 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(a) Statutory Deposits: Total carrying
values of cash and securities deposited by AIGs insurance
subsidiaries under requirements of regulatory authorities were
$15.2 billion and $13.6 billion at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
(b) Net Investment Income: An analysis
of net investment income follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Fixed maturities, including short-term investments
|
|
$
|
20,839
|
|
|
$
|
21,445
|
|
|
$
|
19,773
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
592
|
|
|
|
575
|
|
|
|
277
|
|
Interest on mortgage and other loans
|
|
|
1,516
|
|
|
|
1,423
|
|
|
|
1,253
|
|
Partnerships
|
|
|
(2,022
|
)
|
|
|
1,986
|
|
|
|
1,596
|
|
Mutual funds
|
|
|
(989
|
)
|
|
|
535
|
|
|
|
948
|
|
Trading account losses
|
|
|
(725
|
)
|
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other investments*
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
959
|
|
|
|
1,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income before policyholder income and trading
gains (losses)
|
|
|
20,213
|
|
|
|
26,773
|
|
|
|
25,088
|
|
Policyholder investment income and trading gains (losses)
|
|
|
(6,984
|
)
|
|
|
2,903
|
|
|
|
2,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investment income
|
|
|
13,229
|
|
|
|
29,676
|
|
|
|
27,104
|
|
Investment expenses
|
|
|
1,007
|
|
|
|
1,057
|
|
|
|
1,034
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment income
|
|
$
|
12,222
|
|
|
$
|
28,619
|
|
|
$
|
26,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes net investment income from securities lending
activities, representing interest earned on securities lending
invested collateral offset by interest expense on securities
lending payable. |
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 245
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
(c)
|
Net
Realized Gains and Losses:
|
The Net realized capital gains (losses) and increase
(decrease) in unrealized appreciation of AIGs available
for sale investments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net realized capital gains (losses):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales of fixed maturities
|
|
$
|
(5,266
|
)
|
|
$
|
(468
|
)
|
|
$
|
(382
|
)
|
Sales of equity securities
|
|
|
(119
|
)
|
|
|
1,087
|
|
|
|
813
|
|
Sales of real estate and other assets
|
|
|
1,239
|
|
|
|
619
|
|
|
|
303
|
|
Other-than-temporary impairments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Severity
|
|
|
(29,146
|
)
|
|
|
(1,557
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Lack of intent to hold to recovery
|
|
|
(12,110
|
)
|
|
|
(1,054
|
)
|
|
|
(636
|
)
|
Foreign currency declines
|
|
|
(1,903
|
)
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Issuer-specific credit events
|
|
|
(5,985
|
)
|
|
|
(515
|
)
|
|
|
(262
|
)
|
Adverse projected cash flows on structured securities
|
|
|
(1,661
|
)
|
|
|
(446
|
)
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
Foreign exchange transactions
|
|
|
3,123
|
|
|
|
(643
|
)
|
|
|
(382
|
)
|
Derivative instruments
|
|
|
(3,656
|
)
|
|
|
(115
|
)
|
|
|
698
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(55,484
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,592
|
)
|
|
$
|
106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in unrealized appreciation of investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed maturities
|
|
$
|
(9,944
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,644
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,156
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
(4,654
|
)
|
|
|
2,440
|
|
|
|
432
|
|
Other investments
|
|
|
766
|
|
|
|
(3,842
|
)
|
|
|
986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in unrealized appreciation
|
|
$
|
(13,832
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,046
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,574
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gains (losses) included in the consolidated
statement of income from investment securities classified as
trading securities in 2008, 2007 and 2006 were
$(8.1) billion, $1.1 billion and $938 million,
respectively.
Other-Than-Temporary
Impairments
AIG assesses its ability to hold any fixed maturity security in
an unrealized loss position to its recovery, including fixed
maturity securities classified as available for sale, at each
balance sheet date. The decision to sell any such fixed maturity
security classified as available for sale reflects the judgment
of AIGs management that the security to be sold is
unlikely to provide, on a relative value basis, as attractive a
return in the future as alternative securities entailing
comparable risks. With respect to distressed securities, the
decision to sell reflects the judgment of AIGs management
that the risk-discounted anticipated ultimate recovery is less
than the value achievable on sale.
AIG evaluates its investments for impairments in valuation as
well as credit. The determination that a security has incurred
an other-than-temporary decline in value requires the judgment
of AIGs management and consideration of the fundamental
condition of the issuer, its near-term prospects and all the
relevant facts and circumstances. See Note 1(c)
Investments in Fixed Maturities and Equity Securities for
further information on AIGs impairment policy.
Once a security has been identified as other-than-temporarily
impaired, the amount of such impairment is determined by
reference to that securitys contemporaneous fair value and
recorded as a charge to earnings.
246 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
As a result of AIGs periodic evaluation of its securities
for other-than-temporary impairments in value, AIG recorded
other-than-temporary impairment charges of $50.8 billion,
$4.7 billion (including $643 million related to AIGFP
recorded in other income) and $944 million in 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively.
In light of the recent significant disruption in the
U.S. residential mortgage and credit markets, AIG has
recognized an other-than-temporary impairment charge (severity
loss) of $29.1 billion in 2008, primarily related to
mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized securities, and
securities of financial institutions. Notwithstanding AIGs
intent and ability to hold such securities until they have
recovered their cost basis (except for securities lending
invested collateral comprising $9.2 billion of the severity
loss for 2008), and despite structures that indicate that a
substantial amount of the securities should continue to perform
in accordance with original terms, AIG concluded that it could
not reasonably assert that the impairment period would be
temporary.
In addition to the above severity losses, AIG recorded
other-than-temporary impairment charges in 2008, 2007 and 2006
related to:
|
|
|
|
|
securities that AIG does not intend to hold until recovery;
|
|
|
|
declines due to foreign exchange rates;
|
|
|
|
issuer-specific credit events;
|
|
|
|
certain structured securities impaired under Emerging Issues
Task Force Issue
No. 99-20,
Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased
Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests that Continue to
be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets
and related interpretive guidance; and
|
|
|
|
other impairments, including equity securities and partnership
investments.
|
The gross realized gains and gross realized losses from sales
of AIGs available for sale securities were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
Realized
|
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Fixed maturities
|
|
$
|
6,620
|
|
|
$
|
11,886
|
|
|
$
|
680
|
|
|
$
|
1,148
|
|
|
$
|
711
|
|
|
$
|
1,093
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
1,569
|
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
|
|
320
|
|
Preferred stocks
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
8,070
|
|
|
$
|
13,455
|
|
|
$
|
2,058
|
|
|
$
|
1,439
|
|
|
$
|
1,844
|
|
|
$
|
1,413
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 247
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
(d)
|
Fair
Value of Investment Securities:
|
The amortized cost or cost and fair value of AIGs
available for sale and held to maturity securities were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost or
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
Cost or
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
Fair
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Gains
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Available for sale(a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and government sponsored entities
|
|
$
|
4,433
|
|
|
$
|
331
|
|
|
$
|
(59
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,705
|
|
|
$
|
7,956
|
|
|
$
|
333
|
|
|
$
|
(37
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,252
|
|
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
|
|
62,718
|
|
|
|
1,150
|
|
|
|
(2,611
|
)
|
|
|
61,257
|
|
|
|
46,087
|
|
|
|
927
|
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
46,854
|
|
Non-U.S.
governments
|
|
|
62,176
|
|
|
|
6,560
|
|
|
|
(1,199
|
)
|
|
|
67,537
|
|
|
|
67,023
|
|
|
|
3,920
|
|
|
|
(743
|
)
|
|
|
70,200
|
|
Corporate debt(b)
|
|
|
194,481
|
|
|
|
4,661
|
|
|
|
(13,523
|
)
|
|
|
185,619
|
|
|
|
239,822
|
|
|
|
6,215
|
|
|
|
(4,518
|
)
|
|
|
241,519
|
|
Mortgage-backed, asset- backed and collateralized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RMBS
|
|
|
32,092
|
|
|
|
645
|
|
|
|
(2,985
|
)
|
|
|
29,752
|
|
|
|
89,851
|
|
|
|
433
|
|
|
|
(5,504
|
)
|
|
|
84,780
|
|
CMBS
|
|
|
14,205
|
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
(3,105
|
)
|
|
|
11,226
|
|
|
|
23,918
|
|
|
|
237
|
|
|
|
(1,156
|
)
|
|
|
22,999
|
|
CDO/ABS
|
|
|
6,741
|
|
|
|
233
|
|
|
|
(843
|
)
|
|
|
6,131
|
|
|
|
10,844
|
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
(593
|
)
|
|
|
10,447
|
|
AIGFP(c)
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
16,369
|
|
|
|
355
|
|
|
|
(450
|
)
|
|
|
16,274
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized
|
|
|
53,255
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
(6,933
|
)
|
|
|
47,326
|
|
|
|
140,982
|
|
|
|
1,221
|
|
|
|
(7,703
|
)
|
|
|
134,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total bonds
|
|
|
377,063
|
|
|
|
13,706
|
|
|
|
(24,325
|
)
|
|
|
366,444
|
|
|
|
501,870
|
|
|
|
12,616
|
|
|
|
(13,161
|
)
|
|
|
501,325
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
8,381
|
|
|
|
1,146
|
|
|
|
(719
|
)
|
|
|
8,808
|
|
|
|
15,188
|
|
|
|
5,547
|
|
|
|
(463
|
)
|
|
|
20,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
385,444
|
|
|
|
14,852
|
|
|
|
(25,044
|
)
|
|
|
375,252
|
|
|
|
517,058
|
|
|
|
18,163
|
|
|
|
(13,624
|
)
|
|
|
521,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity(d):
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,581
|
|
|
$
|
609
|
|
|
$
|
(33
|
)
|
|
$
|
22,157
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
At December 31, 2007, included AIGFP available for sale
securities with a fair value of $39.3 billion, for which
AIGFP elected the fair value option effective January 1,
2008, consisting primarily of corporate debt, mortgage-backed,
asset-backed and collateralized securities. At December 31,
2008, the fair value of these securities was $26.1 billion.
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, fixed maturities held by AIG
that were below investment grade or not rated totaled
$19.4 billion and $27.0 billion, respectively. During
the third quarter of 2008, AIG changed its intent to hold until
maturity certain tax-exempt municipal securities held by its
insurance subsidiaries. As a result, all securities previously
classified as held to maturity are now classified in the
available for sale category. See Note 1 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information. Fixed maturity
securities reported on the balance sheet include
$442 million of short-term investments included in
Securities lending invested collateral. |
|
(b) |
|
Excluding AIGFP, corporate debt securities by industry
categories were primarily in financial institutions and
utilities at 42 percent and 13 percent, respectively, at
December 31, 2008 and 42 percent and 11 percent,
respectively, at December 31, 2007. |
|
(c) |
|
The December 31, 2007 amounts represent total AIGFP
investments in mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized
securities for which AIGFP has elected the fair value option
effective January 1, 2008. At December 31, 2008, the
fair value of these securities was $12.4 billion. The
December 31, 2008 amounts represent securities for which
AIGFP has not elected the fair value option. |
|
(d) |
|
Represents obligations of states, municipalities and
political subdivisions. In 2008, AIG changed its intent to hold
such securities to maturity. |
248 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The amortized cost and fair values of AIGs available
for sale fixed maturity securities, by contractual maturity were
as follows. Actual maturities may differ from contractual
maturities because certain borrowers have the right to call or
prepay certain obligations with or without call or prepayment
penalties.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for Sale
|
|
|
|
Amortized
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Due in one year or less
|
|
$
|
15,430
|
|
|
$
|
15,515
|
|
Due after one year through five years
|
|
|
79,619
|
|
|
|
77,742
|
|
Due after five years through ten years
|
|
|
98,957
|
|
|
|
97,064
|
|
Due after ten years
|
|
|
129,802
|
|
|
|
128,797
|
|
Mortgage-backed, asset-backed and collateralized
|
|
|
53,255
|
|
|
|
47,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available for sale
|
|
$
|
377,063
|
|
|
$
|
366,444
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIGs available for sale securities are recorded on the
consolidated balance sheet as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Bonds available for sale
|
|
$
|
363,042
|
|
|
$
|
437,675
|
|
Common and preferred stocks available for sale
|
|
|
8,808
|
|
|
|
20,272
|
|
Securities lending invested collateral*
|
|
|
3,402
|
|
|
|
63,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
375,252
|
|
|
$
|
521,597
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Excludes $442 million and $12.0 billion of short-term
investments included in securities lending invested collateral
at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
|
|
(e)
|
Gross
Unrealized Losses and Estimated Fair Values on
Investments:
|
The following table summarizes the cost basis and gross
unrealized losses on AIGs available for sale securities,
aggregated by major investment category and length of time that
individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss
position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months or Less
|
|
|
More Than 12 Months
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized
|
|
|
|
Cost(a)
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Cost(a)
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Cost(a)
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds(b)
|
|
$
|
142,496
|
|
|
$
|
14,332
|
|
|
$
|
56,312
|
|
|
$
|
9,993
|
|
|
$
|
198,808
|
|
|
$
|
24,325
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
3,749
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,749
|
|
|
|
719
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
146,245
|
|
|
$
|
15,051
|
|
|
$
|
56,312
|
|
|
$
|
9,993
|
|
|
$
|
202,557
|
|
|
$
|
25,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bonds(b)
|
|
$
|
190,809
|
|
|
$
|
9,935
|
|
|
$
|
65,137
|
|
|
$
|
3,226
|
|
|
$
|
255,946
|
|
|
$
|
13,161
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
4,433
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,433
|
|
|
|
463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
195,242
|
|
|
$
|
10,398
|
|
|
$
|
65,137
|
|
|
$
|
3,226
|
|
|
$
|
260,379
|
|
|
$
|
13,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
For bonds, represents amortized cost. |
|
(b) |
|
Primarily relates to the corporate debt category. |
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 249
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
At December 31, 2008, AIG held 29,068 and 40,029 of
individual bond and stock investments, respectively, that were
in an unrealized loss position, of which 7,736 individual
investments were in an unrealized loss position for a continuous
12 months or longer.
AIG did not consider these securities in an unrealized loss
position to be other-than-temporarily impaired at
December 31, 2008, because management has the intent and
ability to hold these investments until they recover their cost
basis within a recovery period deemed to be temporary. In
performing this evaluation, management considered the market
recovery periods for securities in previous periods of broad
market declines. In addition, for certain securities with more
significant declines, management performed extended fundamental
credit analysis on a
security-by-security
basis including consideration of credit enhancements, expected
defaults on underlying collateral, review of relevant industry
analyst reports and forecasts and other market available data.
In managements view this analysis provides persuasive
evidence sufficient to conclude that such severe declines in
fair value below amortized cost should not be considered other
than temporary.
On December 12, 2008, AIG, certain wholly owned
U.S. life insurance company subsidiaries of AIG (the life
insurance companies), and AIG Securities Lending Corp. (the AIG
Agent), another AIG subsidiary, entered into an Asset Purchase
Agreement (the Asset Purchase Agreement) with Maiden
Lane II LLC (ML II), a Delaware limited liability company
whose sole member is the NY Fed.
Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement, the life insurance
companies sold to ML II all of their undivided interests in a
pool of $39.3 billion face amount of residential
mortgage-backed securities (the RMBS) held by the AIG Agent, as
agent of the life insurance companies, in connection with
AIGs U.S. securities lending program (the Securities
Lending Program). The AIG Agent had purchased the RMBS on behalf
of the life insurance companies with cash held as collateral for
securities loaned by the life insurance companies in the U.S.
Securities Lending Program. In exchange for the RMBS, the life
insurance companies received an initial purchase price of
$19.8 billion plus the right to receive deferred contingent
portions of the total purchase price of $1 billion plus a
participation in the residual, each of which is subordinated to
the repayment of the NY Fed loan to ML II. The amount of the
initial payment and the deferred contingent portions of the
total purchase price, if any are realized, will be allocated
among the life insurance companies based on their respective
ownership interests in the pool of RMBS as of September 30,
2008.
Pursuant to a credit agreement, the NY Fed, as senior lender,
made a loan to ML II (the ML II Senior Loan) in the aggregate
amount of $19.5 billion (such amount being the cash
purchase price of the RMBS payable by ML II on the closing date
after certain adjustments, including payments on RMBS for the
period between the transaction settlement date of
October 31, 2008 and the closing date of December 12,
2008). The ML II Senior Loan is secured by a first priority
security interest in the RMBS and all property of ML II, bears
interest at a rate per annum equal to one-month LIBOR plus
1.00 percent and has a stated six-year term, subject to
extension by the NY Fed at its sole discretion. After the ML II
Senior Loan has been repaid in full, to the extent there are
sufficient net cash proceeds from the RMBS, the life insurance
companies will be entitled to receive from ML II a portion of
the deferred contingent purchase price in the amount of up to
$1.0 billion plus interest that accrues from the closing
date and is capitalized monthly at the rate of one-month LIBOR
plus 3.0 percent. In addition, after ML II has paid this
fixed portion of the deferred contingent purchase price plus
interest, the life insurance companies will be entitled to
receive one-sixth of any net proceeds received by ML II in
respect of the RMBS as the remaining deferred contingent
purchase price for the RMBS and the NY Fed will receive
five-sixths of any net proceeds received by ML II in respect of
the RMBS as contingent interest on the ML II Senior Loan. The NY
Fed will have sole control over ML II and the sales of the RMBS
by ML II so long as the NY Fed has any interest in the ML II
Senior Loan.
AIG does not have any control rights over ML II. AIG has
determined that ML II is a variable interest entity (VIE) and
AIG is not the primary beneficiary. The transfer of RMBS to ML
II has been accounted for as a sale, in accordance with
FAS 140. AIG has elected to account for its $1 billion
economic interest in ML II (including the rights to the deferred
contingent purchase price) at fair value under FAS 159.
This interest is reported in Bonds
250 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
trading securities, with changes in fair value reported as a
component of Net investment income. See Note 4 for further
discussion of AIGs fair value methodology.
The life insurance companies applied the initial consideration
from the RMBS sale, along with available cash and
$5.1 billion provided by AIG in the form of capital
contributions, to settle outstanding securities lending
transactions under the U.S. Securities Lending Program,
including those with the NY Fed, which totaled approximately
$20.5 billion at December 12, 2008, and the U.S.
Securities Lending Program and the Securities Lending Agreement
with the NY Fed have been terminated.
On November 25, 2008, AIG entered into a Master Investment
and Credit Agreement (the ML III Agreement) with the NY Fed,
Maiden Lane III LLC (ML III), and The Bank of New York
Mellon, which established arrangements, through ML III, to fund
the purchase of multi-sector collateralized debt obligations
(multi-sector CDOs) underlying or related to certain credit
default swaps and other similar derivative instruments (CDS)
written by AIG Financial Products Corp. in connection with the
termination of such CDS. Concurrently, AIG Financial Products
Corp.s counterparties to such CDS transactions agreed to
terminate those CDS transactions relating to the multi-sector
CDOs purchased from them.
Pursuant to the ML III Agreement, the NY Fed, as senior lender,
made available to ML III a term loan facility (the ML III Senior
Loan) in an aggregate amount up to $30.0 billion. The ML
III Senior Loan bears interest at one-month LIBOR plus
1.0 percent and has a six-year expected term, subject to
extension by the NY Fed at its sole discretion.
AIG contributed $5.0 billion for an equity interest in ML
III. The equity interest will accrue distributions at a rate per
annum equal to one-month LIBOR plus 3.0 percent. Accrued
but unpaid distributions on the equity interest will be
compounded monthly. AIGs rights to payment from ML III are
fully subordinated and junior to all payments of principal and
interest on the ML III Senior Loan. The creditors of ML III do
not have recourse to AIG for ML IIIs obligations, although
AIG is exposed to losses up to the full amount of AIGs
equity interest in ML III.
Upon payment in full of the ML III Senior Loan and the accrued
distributions on AIGs equity interest in ML III, all
remaining amounts received by ML III will be paid
67 percent to the NY Fed as contingent interest and
33 percent to AIG as contingent distributions on its equity
interest.
The NY Fed is the controlling party and managing member of ML
III for so long as the NY Fed has any interest in the
ML III Senior Loan. AIG does not have any control rights
over ML III. AIG has determined that ML III is a VIE and AIG is
not the primary beneficiary. AIG has elected to account for its
$5 billion interest in ML III (including the rights to
contingent distributions) at fair value under FAS 159. This
interest is reported in Bonds trading securities, at
fair value, with changes in fair value reported as a component
of Net investment income. See Note 4 for a further
discussion of AIGs fair value methodology.
Through December 31, 2008, AIG Financial Products Corp.
terminated CDS transactions with its counterparties and
concurrently, ML III purchased the underlying multi-sector CDOs,
including $8.5 billion of multi-sector CDOs underlying
2a-7 Puts
written by AIG Financial Products Corp. The NY Fed advanced an
aggregate of $24.3 billion to ML III under the ML III
Senior Loan, and ML III funded its purchase of the
$62.1 billion of multi-sector CDOs with a net payment to
AIG Financial Products Corp. counterparties of
$26.8 billion. AIG Financial Products Corp.s
counterparties also retained $35.0 billion, of which
$2.5 billion was returned under the shortfall agreement, in
net collateral previously posted by AIG Financial Products Corp.
in respect of the terminated multi-sector CDS. The
$26.8 billion funded by ML III was based on the fair value
of the underlying multi-sector CDOs at October 31, 2008, as
mutually agreed between the NY Fed and AIG.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 251
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
(h)
|
Other
Invested Assets:
|
Other invested assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Partnerships(a)
|
|
$
|
24,416
|
|
|
$
|
28,938
|
|
Mutual funds
|
|
|
2,924
|
|
|
|
4,891
|
|
Investment real estate(b)
|
|
|
8,879
|
|
|
|
9,877
|
|
Aircraft asset investments(c)
|
|
|
1,597
|
|
|
|
1,689
|
|
Life settlement contracts(d)
|
|
|
2,581
|
|
|
|
1,610
|
|
Consolidated managed partnerships and funds
|
|
|
6,714
|
|
|
|
6,614
|
|
Investments in partially owned companies
|
|
|
649
|
|
|
|
654
|
|
All other investments
|
|
|
4,218
|
|
|
|
5,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other invested assets
|
|
$
|
51,978
|
|
|
$
|
59,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes private equity partnerships and hedge funds. |
|
(b) |
|
Net of accumulated depreciation of $813 million and
$548 million in 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
|
(c) |
|
Consist primarily of Life Insurance & Retirement
Services investments in aircraft equipment held in trusts. |
|
(d) |
|
See paragraph (i) below for additional information. |
At December 31, 2008 and 2007, $6.8 billion and
$7.2 billion of Other invested assets related to available
for sale investments carried at fair value, with unrealized
gains and losses recorded in of Accumulated other comprehensive
income (loss), net of deferred taxes, with almost all of the
remaining investments being accounted for on the equity method
of accounting. All of the investments are subject to impairment
testing (see Note 1(k) herein). The gross unrealized loss
on the investments accounted for as available for sale at
December 31, 2008 was $438 million, the majority of
which represents investments that have been in a continuous
unrealized loss position for less than 12 months.
(i) Investments in Life Settlement
Contracts: At December 31, 2008, the
carrying value of AIGs life settlement contracts was
$2.6 billion, and is included in Other invested assets in
the consolidated balance sheet. These investments are monitored
for impairment on a contract-by-contract basis quarterly. During
2008, income recognized on life settlement contracts previously
held in non-consolidated trusts was $99 million, and is
included in net investment income in the consolidated statement
of income.
Further information regarding life settlement contracts
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Face Value
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
Contracts
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
(Death Benefits)
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Remaining Life Expectancy of Insureds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 1 year
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
1 2 years
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
2 3 years
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
3 4 years
|
|
|
166
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
296
|
|
4 5 years
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
|
163
|
|
|
|
357
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
3,522
|
|
|
|
2,136
|
|
|
|
10,963
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
4,077
|
|
|
$
|
2,581
|
|
|
$
|
11,831
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
252 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
At December 31, 2008, the anticipated life insurance
premiums required to keep the life settlement contracts in
force, payable in the ensuing twelve months ending
December 31, 2009 and the four succeeding years ending
December 31, 2013 are $258 million, $280 million,
$279 million, $285 million, and $285 million,
respectively.
Mortgages and other loans receivable were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Mortgages commercial
|
|
$
|
17,161
|
|
|
$
|
17,105
|
|
Mortgages residential*
|
|
|
2,271
|
|
|
|
2,153
|
|
Life insurance policy loans
|
|
|
9,589
|
|
|
|
8,099
|
|
Collateral, guaranteed, and other commercial loans
|
|
|
5,874
|
|
|
|
6,447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total mortgage and other loans receivable
|
|
|
34,895
|
|
|
|
33,804
|
|
Allowance for losses
|
|
|
(208
|
)
|
|
|
(77
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage and other loans receivable, net
|
|
$
|
34,687
|
|
|
$
|
33,727
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Primarily consists of foreign mortgage loans. |
Mortgage loans and other receivables held for sale were
$33 million and $377 million at December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively.
Finance receivables, net of unearned finance charges, were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Real estate loans
|
|
$
|
20,650
|
|
|
$
|
20,023
|
|
Non-real estate loans
|
|
|
5,763
|
|
|
|
5,447
|
|
Retail sales finance
|
|
|
3,417
|
|
|
|
3,659
|
|
Credit card loans
|
|
|
1,422
|
|
|
|
1,566
|
|
Other loans
|
|
|
1,169
|
|
|
|
1,417
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total finance receivables
|
|
|
32,421
|
|
|
|
32,112
|
|
Allowance for losses
|
|
|
(1,472
|
)
|
|
|
(878
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance receivables, net
|
|
$
|
30,949
|
|
|
$
|
31,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance receivables held for sale were $960 million and
$233 million at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
In the ordinary course of business, AIGs General Insurance
and Life Insurance companies place reinsurance with other
insurance companies in order to provide greater diversification
of AIGs business and limit the potential for losses
arising from large risks. In addition, AIGs General
Insurance subsidiaries assume reinsurance from other insurance
companies.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 253
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Supplemental information for gross loss and benefit reserves
net of ceded reinsurance follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As
|
|
|
Net of
|
|
|
|
Reported
|
|
|
Reinsurance
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense
|
|
$
|
(89,258
|
)
|
|
$
|
(72,455
|
)
|
Future policy benefits for life and accident and health
insurance contracts
|
|
|
(142,334
|
)
|
|
|
(140,750
|
)
|
Reserve for unearned premiums
|
|
|
(25,735
|
)
|
|
|
(21,540
|
)
|
Reinsurance assets*
|
|
|
22,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense
|
|
$
|
(85,500
|
)
|
|
$
|
(69,288
|
)
|
Future policy benefits for life and accident and health
insurance contracts
|
|
|
(136,387
|
)
|
|
|
(134,781
|
)
|
Reserve for unearned premiums
|
|
|
(27,703
|
)
|
|
|
(23,709
|
)
|
Reinsurance assets*
|
|
|
21,811
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Represents gross reinsurance assets, excluding allowances and
reinsurance recoverable on paid losses. |
AIRCO acts primarily as an internal reinsurance company for
AIGs insurance operations. This facilitates insurance risk
management (retention, volatility, concentrations) and capital
planning locally (branch and subsidiary). It also allows AIG to
pool its insurance risks and purchase reinsurance more
efficiently at a consolidated level, manage global counterparty
risk and relationships and manage global life catastrophe risks.
General
Reinsurance
General reinsurance is effected under reinsurance treaties and
by negotiation on individual risks. Certain of these reinsurance
arrangements consist of excess of loss contracts which protect
AIG against losses over stipulated amounts. Ceded premiums are
considered prepaid reinsurance premiums and are recognized as a
reduction of premiums earned over the contract period in
proportion to the protection received. Amounts recoverable from
general reinsurers are estimated in a manner consistent with the
claims liabilities associated with the reinsurance and presented
as a component of reinsurance assets. Assumed reinsurance
premiums are earned primarily on a pro-rata basis over the terms
of the reinsurance contracts. For both ceded and assumed
reinsurance, risk transfer requirements must be met in order for
reinsurance accounting to apply. If risk transfer requirements
are not met, the contract is accounted for as a deposit,
resulting in the recognition of cash flows under the contract
through a deposit asset or liability and not as revenue or
expense. To meet risk transfer requirements, a reinsurance
contract must include both insurance risk, consisting of both
underwriting and timing risk, and a reasonable possibility of a
significant loss for the assuming entity. Similar risk transfer
criteria are used to determine whether directly written
insurance contracts should be accounted for as insurance or as a
deposit.
254 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
General Insurance premiums written and earned were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Premiums written:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
$
|
49,422
|
|
|
$
|
52,055
|
|
|
$
|
49,609
|
|
Assumed
|
|
|
7,239
|
|
|
|
6,743
|
|
|
|
6,671
|
|
Ceded
|
|
|
(11,427
|
)
|
|
|
(11,731
|
)
|
|
|
(11,414
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
45,234
|
|
|
$
|
47,067
|
|
|
$
|
44,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums earned:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct
|
|
$
|
50,110
|
|
|
$
|
50,403
|
|
|
$
|
47,973
|
|
Assumed
|
|
|
7,336
|
|
|
|
6,530
|
|
|
|
6,449
|
|
Ceded
|
|
|
(11,224
|
)
|
|
|
(11,251
|
)
|
|
|
(10,971
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
46,222
|
|
|
$
|
45,682
|
|
|
$
|
43,451
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
reinsurance recoveries, which reduced loss and loss expenses
incurred, amounted to $8.4 billion, $9.0 billion and
$8.3 billion, respectively.
Life
Reinsurance
Life reinsurance is effected principally under yearly renewable
term treaties. The premiums with respect to these treaties are
considered prepaid reinsurance premiums and are recognized as a
reduction of premiums earned over the contract period in
proportion to the protection provided. Amounts recoverable from
life reinsurers are estimated in a manner consistent with the
assumptions used for the underlying policy benefits and are
presented as a component of reinsurance assets.
Life Insurance & Retirement Services premiums were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Gross premiums
|
|
$
|
39,153
|
|
|
$
|
34,585
|
|
|
$
|
32,247
|
|
Ceded premiums
|
|
|
(1,858
|
)
|
|
|
(1,778
|
)
|
|
|
(1,481
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums
|
|
$
|
37,295
|
|
|
$
|
32,807
|
|
|
$
|
30,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance recoveries, which reduced death and other
benefits, approximated $908 million, $1.1 billion and
$806 million, respectively, for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
Life Insurance in force ceded to other insurance companies
was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Life Insurance in force ceded
|
|
$
|
384,538
|
|
|
$
|
402,654
|
|
|
$
|
408,970
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance assumed represented less than 0.1 percent,
0.1 percent and 0.1 percent of gross Life
Insurance in force at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, and Life Insurance & Retirement Services
premiums assumed represented 0.2 percent, 0.1 percent
and 0.1 percent of gross premiums and other considerations
for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively.
AIGs Domestic Life Insurance and Domestic Retirement
Services operations utilize internal and third-party reinsurance
relationships to manage insurance risks and to facilitate
capital management strategies. Pools of highly-
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 255
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
rated third-party reinsurers are utilized to manage net amounts
at risk in excess of retention limits. AIGs Domestic Life
Insurance companies also cede excess, non-economic reserves
carried on a statutory-basis only on certain term and universal
life insurance policies and certain fixed annuities to an
offshore affiliate.
AIG generally obtains letters of credit in order to obtain
statutory recognition of its intercompany reinsurance
transactions. For this purpose, AIG has a $2.5 billion
syndicated letter of credit facility outstanding at
December 31, 2008, all of which relates to life
intercompany reinsurance transactions. AIG has also obtained
approximately $2.3 billion of letters of credit on a
bilateral basis all of which relates to life intercompany
reinsurance transactions. All of these approximately
$4.8 billion of letters of credit are due to mature on
December 31, 2015. In the event that AIGs Domestic
Life Insurance companies cease to be wholly owned subsidiaries
of AIG, then AIG may no longer be able to utilize these letters
of credit or the above referenced facility.
Reinsurance
Security
AIGs third-party reinsurance arrangements do not relieve
AIG from its direct obligation to its insureds. Thus, a credit
exposure exists with respect to both general and life
reinsurance ceded to the extent that any reinsurer fails to meet
the obligations assumed under any reinsurance agreement. AIG
holds substantial collateral as security under related
reinsurance agreements in the form of funds, securities,
and/or
letters of credit. A provision has been recorded for estimated
unrecoverable reinsurance. AIG has been largely successful in
prior recovery efforts.
AIG evaluates the financial condition of its reinsurers and
establishes limits per reinsurer through AIGs Credit Risk
Committee. AIG believes that no exposure to a single reinsurer
represents an inappropriate concentration of risk to AIG, nor is
AIGs business substantially dependent upon any single
reinsurer.
|
|
8.
|
Deferred
Policy Acquisition Costs
|
The rollforward of deferred policy acquisition costs were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
General Insurance operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
5,407
|
|
|
$
|
4,977
|
|
|
$
|
4,546
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs deferred
|
|
|
7,370
|
|
|
|
8,661
|
|
|
|
8,115
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
|
(7,428
|
)
|
|
|
(8,235
|
)
|
|
|
(7,866
|
)
|
Increase (decrease) due to foreign exchange and other
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year
|
|
$
|
5,114
|
|
|
$
|
5,407
|
|
|
$
|
4,977
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance & Retirement Services operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
38,445
|
|
|
$
|
32,810
|
|
|
$
|
28,106
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition costs deferred
|
|
|
7,277
|
|
|
|
7,276
|
|
|
|
6,823
|
|
Amortization expense(a)
|
|
|
(4,971
|
)
|
|
|
(3,367
|
)
|
|
|
(3,712
|
)
|
Change in net unrealized gains (losses) on securities
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
Increase (decrease) due to foreign exchange
|
|
|
(466
|
)
|
|
|
916
|
|
|
|
947
|
|
Other(b)
|
|
|
(1,091
|
)
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
$
|
40,613
|
|
|
$
|
38,445
|
|
|
$
|
32,810
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidation and eliminations
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of year(c)
|
|
$
|
40,668
|
|
|
$
|
38,507
|
|
|
$
|
32,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
$
|
45,782
|
|
|
$
|
43,914
|
|
|
$
|
37,857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
256 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(a) |
|
In 2007, amortization expense was reduced by
$732 million related to changes in actuarial estimates,
which was mostly offset in policyholder benefits and claims
incurred. |
|
(b) |
|
In 2008, primarily represents the cumulative effect of the
adoption of FAS 159. In 2007, includes the cumulative
effect of the adoption of
SOP 05-1
of $(118) million and a balance sheet reclassification of
$189 million. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes $1.4 billion, $5 million and
$(720) million at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, related to the effect of net unrealized gains and
losses on available for sale securities. |
Included in the above table is the VOBA, an intangible asset
recorded during purchase accounting, which is amortized in a
manner similar to DAC. Amortization of VOBA was
$111 million, $213 million and $239 million in
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, while the unamortized balance
was $2.05 billion, $1.86 billion and
$1.98 billion at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. The percentage of the unamortized balance of VOBA
at 2008 expected to be amortized in 2009 through 2013 by year
is: 11.7 percent, 10.0 percent, 8.1 percent,
7.4 percent and 6.2 percent, respectively, with
56.6 percent being amortized after five years. These
projections are based on current estimates for investment,
persistency, mortality and morbidity assumptions. The DAC
amortization charged to income includes the increase or decrease
of amortization for
FAS 97-related
realized capital gains (losses), primarily in the Domestic
Retirement Services business. In 2008, 2007 and 2006, the rate
of amortization expense decreased by $2.2 billion,
$291 million and $90 million, respectively.
There were no impairments of DAC or VOBA for the years ended
December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006.
|
|
9.
|
Variable
Interest Entities
|
FIN 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities provides the guidance for the determination of
consolidation for certain entities in which equity investors do
not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest
or do not have sufficient equity that is at risk which would
allow the entity to finance its activities without additional
subordinated financial support. FIN 46R recognizes that
consolidation based on majority voting interest should not apply
to these VIEs. A VIE is consolidated by its primary beneficiary,
which is the party or group of related parties that absorbs a
majority of the expected losses of the VIE, receives the
majority of the expected residual returns of the VIE, or both.
AIG primarily determines whether it is the primary beneficiary
or a significant interest holder based on a qualitative
assessment of the VIE. This includes a review of the VIEs
capital structure, contractual relationships and terms, nature
of the VIEs operations and purpose, nature of the
VIEs interests issued, and AIGs interests in the
entity which either create or absorb variability. AIG evaluates
the design of the VIE and the related risks the entity was
designed to expose the variable interest holders to in
evaluating consolidation. In limited cases, when it may be
unclear from a qualitative standpoint if AIG is the primary
beneficiary, AIG uses a quantitative analysis to calculate the
probability weighted expected losses and probability weighted
expected residual returns using cash flow modeling.
AIGs total off balance sheet exposure associated with VIEs
was $3.3 billion and $1.2 billion at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 257
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table presents AIGs total assets, total
liabilities and off-balance sheet exposure associated with its
significant variable interests in consolidated VIEs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
VIE Assets(a)
|
|
|
VIE Liabilities
|
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet Exposure
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007(b)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In billions)
|
|
|
Real estate and investment funds
|
|
$
|
5.6
|
|
|
$
|
9.2
|
|
|
$
|
3.1
|
|
|
$
|
2.6
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
Commercial paper conduit
|
|
|
8.8
|
|
|
|
8.9
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
8.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CLOs/CDOs
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Affordable housing partnerships
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
17.6
|
|
|
$
|
22.9
|
|
|
$
|
11.6
|
|
|
$
|
11.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Each of the VIEs assets can be used only to settle
specific obligations of that VIE. |
|
(b) |
|
In 2008, AIG made revisions to the VIE assets reported above
to exclude certain entities previously categorized as VIEs that
were historically consolidated based on a voting interest model,
were duplicated or were otherwise miscategorized. Accordingly,
AIG revised the prior period presented to conform to the revised
presentation. |
AIG defines a variable interest as significant relative to the
materiality of its interest in the VIE. AIG calculates its
maximum exposure to loss to be (i) the amount invested in
the debt or equity of the VIE, (ii) the notional amount of
VIE assets or liabilities where AIG has also provided credit
protection to the VIE with the VIE as the referenced obligation,
or (iii) other commitments and guarantees to the VIE.
Interest holders in VIEs sponsored by AIG generally have
recourse only to the assets and cash flows of the VIEs and do
not have recourse to AIG, except in limited circumstances when
AIG has provided a guarantee to the VIEs interest holders.
The following table presents total assets of
unconsolidated VIEs in which AIG holds a significant
variable interest or is a sponsor that holds variable interest
in a VIE, and AIGs maximum exposure to loss associated
with these VIEs:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Exposure to Loss(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On-Balance Sheet
|
|
|
Off-Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VIE
|
|
|
and Retained
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Interests
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Guarantees
|
|
|
Derivatives
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In billions)
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate and investment funds
|
|
$
|
23.5
|
|
|
$
|
2.5
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
4.6
|
|
CLOs/CDOs
|
|
|
95.9
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
6.9
|
|
Affordable housing partnerships
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Maiden Lane Interests
|
|
|
46.4
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.9
|
|
Other(c)
|
|
|
8.7
|
|
|
|
2.1
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
175.5
|
|
|
$
|
15.9
|
|
|
$
|
2.0
|
|
|
$
|
1.9
|
|
|
$
|
0.5
|
|
|
$
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007(b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real estate and investment funds
|
|
$
|
40.6
|
|
|
$
|
3.9
|
|
|
$
|
3.8
|
|
|
$
|
0.3
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8.0
|
|
CLOs/CDOs
|
|
|
104.7
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.2
|
|
Affordable housing partnerships
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.9
|
|
Other(c)
|
|
|
20.3
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
|
|
|
1.5
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
166.5
|
|
|
$
|
24.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.2
|
|
|
$
|
0.4
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
31.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
258 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(a) |
|
AIGs total maximum exposure to loss on unconsolidated
VIEs declined from December 31, 2007 as a result of the
termination of certain of AIGFPs transactions and the
effects of overall market deterioration. |
|
(b) |
|
In 2008, AIG made revisions to the presentation of assets and
liabilities of unconsolidated VIEs to remove previously
disclosed equity investments in entities that do not meet the
criteria of a VIE as defined in FIN 46R. The investments
are classified on the consolidated balance sheet as other
invested assets. Accordingly, AIG revised the prior period
presented to conform to the revised presentation. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes $1.4 billion and $2.4 billion of assets
held in an unconsolidated SIV sponsored by AIGFP in 2008 and
2007, respectively. As of December 31, 2008 and 2007,
AIGFPs invested assets included $0.6 billion and
$1.7 billion, respectively, of securities purchased under
agreements to resell, commercial paper and medium-term and
capital notes issued by this entity. |
Balance
Sheet Classification
AIGs interest in the assets and liabilities of
consolidated and unconsolidated VIEs were classified on
AIGs consolidated balance sheet as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
Consolidated VIEs
|
|
|
Unconsolidated VIEs
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In billions)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
0.9
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Mortgage and other loans receivable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Available for sale securities
|
|
|
9.1
|
|
|
|
10.7
|
|
|
|
6.4
|
|
|
|
20.1
|
|
Trading securities (primarily Maiden Lane Interests in 2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
|
|
|
5.5
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
|
Other invested assets
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
|
|
3.9
|
|
|
|
3.5
|
|
|
|
9.0
|
|
Other asset accounts
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
0.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
17.6
|
|
|
$
|
22.9
|
|
|
$
|
17.9
|
|
|
$
|
30.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank of New York commercial paper funding
facility
|
|
$
|
6.8
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Other long-term debt
|
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
|
11.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11.6
|
|
|
$
|
11.2
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG enters into various arrangements with VIEs in the normal
course of business. AIGs insurance companies are involved
with VIEs primarily as passive investors in debt securities
(rated and unrated) and equity interests issued by VIEs. Through
its Financial Services and Asset Management operations, AIG has
participated in arrangements with VIEs that included designing
and structuring entities, warehousing and managing the
collateral of the entities, and entering into insurance, credit
and derivative transactions with the VIEs.
Real
Estate and Investment Funds
AIG Investments, through AIG Global Real Estate, is an investor
in various real estate investments, some of which are VIEs.
These investments are typically with unaffiliated third-party
developers via a partnership or limited liability company
structure. The VIEs activities consist of the development
or redevelopment of commercial and residential real estate.
AIGs involvement varies from being a passive equity
investor or finance provider to actively managing the activities
of the VIE.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 259
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
In certain instances, AIG Investments acts as the investment
manager of an investment fund, private equity fund or hedge fund
and is responsible for carrying out the investment mandate of
the VIE. AIGs insurance operations participate as passive
investors in the equity issued primarily by third-party-managed
hedge and private equity funds and some AIG Investments managed
funds. AIGs insurance operations typically are not
involved in the design or establishment of VIEs, nor do they
actively participate in the management of VIEs.
Commercial
Paper Conduit
AIGFP is the primary beneficiary of Curzon Funding LLC, an
asset-backed commercial paper conduit to third parties, the
assets of which serve as collateral for the conduits
obligations. During 2008, the entity issued $6.8 billion of
commercial paper and participated in the CPFF.
CLOs/CDOs
AIGFP has invested in CDOs, and similar structures, which can be
cash-based or synthetic and are actively or passively managed.
AIGFPs role is generally limited to that of an investor.
It does not manage such structures.
In certain instances, AIG Investments acts as the collateral
manager of a CDO or collateralized loan obligation (CLO). In CDO
and CLO transactions, AIG establishes a trust or other special
purpose entity that purchases a portfolio of assets such as bank
loans, corporate debt, or non-performing credits and issues
trust certificates or debt securities that represent interests
in the portfolio of assets. These transactions can be cash-based
or synthetic and are actively or passively managed. The
management fees that AIG Investments earns as collateral manager
are not material to AIGs consolidated financial
statements. Certain AIG insurance companies also invest in these
CDOs and CLOs. AIG combines variable interests (e.g. management,
performance fees and debt or equity securities) held through its
various operating subsidiaries in evaluating the need for
consolidation. The CDOs in which AIG holds an ownership interest
are further described in Note 5.
Affordable
Housing Partnerships
SunAmerica Affordable Housing Partners, Inc. (SAAHP) organizes
and invests in limited partnerships that develop and operate
affordable housing qualifying for federal tax credits, and a few
market rate properties across the United States. The general
partners in the operating partnerships are almost exclusively
unaffiliated third-party developers. AIG does not consolidate an
operating partnership if the general partner is an unaffiliated
person. Through approximately 1,200 partnerships, SAAHP has
invested in developments with approximately 157,000 apartment
units nationwide, and has syndicated over $7 billion in
partnership equity since 1991 to other investors who will
receive, among other benefits, tax credits under certain
sections of the Internal Revenue Code. The operating income of
SAAHP is reported, along with other SunAmerica partnership
income, as a component of AIGs Asset Management segment.
Maiden
Lane Interests
ML II
On December 12, 2008, certain AIG wholly owned life
insurance companies sold all of their undivided interests in a
pool of $39.3 billion face amount of RMBS to ML II, whose
sole member is the NY Fed. AIG has a significant variable
economic interest in ML II, which is a VIE. See Note 5 for
details of AIGs agreement regarding ML II.
ML III
On November 25, 2008, AIG entered into the ML III Agreement
with the NY Fed, ML III, and The Bank of New York Mellon, which
established arrangements, through ML III, to fund the purchase
of multi-sector CDOs underlying or related to CDS written by AIG
Financial Products Corp. in connection with the termination of
such CDS. Concurrently, AIG Financial Products Corps
counterparties to such CDS transactions agreed to terminate
260 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
those CDS transactions relating to the multi-sector CDOs
purchased from them. AIG has a significant variable interest in
ML III, which is a VIE. See Note 5 for details of
AIGs agreement regarding ML III.
Other
Asset Accounts
Structured
Investment Vehicle
In 2007, AIGFP sponsored Nightingale Finance LLC, its only
structured investment vehicle (SIV), that invests in variable
rate, investment-grade debt securities, the majority of which
are asset-backed securities. AIGFP has an obligation to support
the SIV by purchasing commercial paper or providing repurchase
financing to the extent that the SIV is unable to finance itself
in the open market. The SIV meets the definition of a VIE
because it does not have sufficient equity to operate without
subordinated capital notes, which serve as equity even though
they are legally debt instruments. The capital notes absorb
losses prior to the senior debt. During 2008, AIGFPs
interest in the SIV was reduced to $150 million of
investments in its medium term notes and $406 million of
securities purchased under agreement to resell, primarily due to
the issuance of $1.1 billion of commercial paper as a
result of its participation in the NY Feds CPFF in October
2008. AIGFP did not own a material loss-absorbing variable
interest in the SIV at December 31, 2008 and, therefore, is
not the primary beneficiary.
Qualifying
Special Purpose Entities (QSPEs)
AIG sponsors three QSPEs that issue securities backed by
consumer loans collateralized by individual life insurance
assets. As of December 31, 2008, AIGs maximum
exposure, representing the carrying value of the consumer loans,
was $854 million and the total VIE assets for these
entities was $2.9 billion. AIG records the maximum exposure
as finance receivables and, in accordance with SFAS 140,
does not consolidate the total VIE assets of these entities.
RMBS,
CMBS and Other ABS
AIG is a passive investor in RMBS, CMBS and other ABS primarily
issued by domestic entities that are typically structured as
QSPEs. AIG does not sponsor or transfer assets to the entities
and was not involved in the design of the entities; as such, AIG
has not included these entities in the above table. As the
non-sponsor and non-transferor, AIG does not have the
information needed to conclusively verify that these entities
are QSPEs. AIGs maximum exposure is limited to its
investment in securities issued by these entities and AIG is not
the primary beneficiary of the overall entity activities. As
further discussed in Note 5, the fair value of AIGs
investment in RMBS, CMBS and CDO/ABS was $59.6 billion and
$134.5 billion at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively.
|
|
10.
|
Derivatives
and Hedge Accounting
|
AIG uses derivatives and other financial instruments as part of
its financial risk management programs and as part of its
investment operations. AIGFP has also transacted in derivatives
as a dealer.
Derivatives, as defined in FAS 133, are financial
arrangements among two or more parties with returns linked to or
derived from some underlying equity, debt, commodity
or other asset, liability, or foreign exchange rate or other
index or the occurrence of a specified payment event. Derivative
payments may be based on interest rates, exchange rates, prices
of certain securities, commodities, or financial or commodity
indices or other variables. Derivatives are reflected at fair
value on the balance sheet in Unrealized gain on swaps,
options and forward transactions and Unrealized loss
on swaps, options and forward contracts.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 261
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The fair values of derivative assets and liabilities on the
consolidated balances sheet were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
Derivative Assets
|
|
|
Derivative Liabilities
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
AIGFP derivatives
|
|
$
|
12,111
|
|
|
$
|
12,319
|
|
|
$
|
4,344
|
|
|
$
|
14,817
|
|
Non-AIGFP derivatives
|
|
|
1,662
|
|
|
|
1,785
|
|
|
|
1,894
|
|
|
|
3,214
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
13,773
|
|
|
$
|
14,104
|
|
|
$
|
6,238
|
|
|
$
|
18,031
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIGFP
Derivatives
AIGFP enters into derivative transactions to mitigate risk in
its exposures (interest rates, currencies, commodities, credit
and equities) arising from its transactions. In most cases,
AIGFP did not hedge its exposures related to the credit default
swaps it had written. As a dealer, AIGFP structured and entered
into derivative transactions to meet the needs of counterparties
who may be seeking to hedge certain aspects of such
counterparties operations or obtain a desired financial
exposure.
AIGFPs derivative transactions involving interest rate
swap transactions generally involve the exchange of fixed and
floating rate interest payment obligations without the exchange
of the underlying notional amounts. AIGFP typically became a
principal in the exchange of interest payments between the
parties and, therefore, is exposed to counterparty credit risk
and may be exposed to loss, if counterparties default. Currency,
commodity, and equity swaps are similar to interest rate swaps,
but involve the exchange of specific currencies or cashflows
based on the underlying commodity, equity securities or indices.
Also, they may involve the exchange of notional amounts at the
beginning and end of the transaction. Swaptions are options
where the holder has the right but not the obligation to enter
into a swap transaction or cancel an existing swap transaction.
AIGFP follows a policy of minimizing interest rate, currency,
commodity, and equity risks associated with securities available
for sale by entering into internal offsetting positions, on a
security by security basis within its derivatives portfolio,
thereby offsetting a significant portion of the unrealized
appreciation and depreciation. In addition, to reduce its credit
risk, AIGFP has entered into credit derivative transactions with
respect to $635 million of securities to economically hedge
its credit risk. As previously discussed, these economic offsets
did not meet the hedge accounting requirements of FAS 133
and, therefore, are recorded in Other income in the Consolidated
Statement of Income.
Notional amount represents a standard of measurement of the
volume of swaps business of AIGFP. Notional amount is not a
quantification of market risk or credit risk and is not recorded
on the consolidated balance sheet. Notional amounts generally
represent those amounts used to calculate contractual cash flows
to be exchanged and are not paid or received, except for certain
contracts such as currency swaps.
The timing and the amount of cash flows relating to AIGFPs
foreign exchange forwards and exchange traded futures and
options contracts are determined by each of the respective
contractual agreements.
262 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table presents the notional amounts by
remaining maturity of AIGFP interest rate, credit default and
currency swaps and swaptions derivatives portfolio:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Life of Notional Amount at December 31,
2008(a)
|
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
Two Through
|
|
|
Six Through
|
|
|
After Ten
|
|
|
at December 31,
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
Ten Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps
|
|
$
|
190,864
|
|
|
$
|
542,810
|
|
|
$
|
139,674
|
|
|
$
|
9,714
|
|
|
$
|
883,062
|
|
|
$
|
1,167,464
|
|
Credit default swaps(b)
|
|
|
98,398
|
|
|
|
173,168
|
|
|
|
29,734
|
|
|
|
4,239
|
|
|
|
305,539
|
|
|
|
561,813
|
|
Currency swaps
|
|
|
35,504
|
|
|
|
117,988
|
|
|
|
35,565
|
|
|
|
5,274
|
|
|
|
194,331
|
|
|
|
224,275
|
|
Swaptions, equity and commodity swaps
|
|
|
28,907
|
|
|
|
60,998
|
|
|
|
33,236
|
|
|
|
8,786
|
|
|
|
131,927
|
|
|
|
178,967
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
353,673
|
|
|
$
|
894,964
|
|
|
$
|
238,209
|
|
|
$
|
28,013
|
|
|
$
|
1,514,859
|
|
|
$
|
2,132,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Notional amount is not representative of either market risk
or credit risk and is not recorded in the consolidated balance
sheet. |
(b) |
|
Netted in the notional amount at December 31, 2008 is
$5.5 billion of gross notional amount where credit
protection was both purchased and sold on the same
underlying. |
Futures and forward contracts are contracts that obligate the
holder to sell or purchase foreign currencies, commodities or
financial indices in which the seller/purchaser agrees to
make/take delivery at a specified future date of a specified
instrument, at a specified price or yield. Options are contracts
that allow the holder of the option to purchase or sell the
underlying commodity, currency or index at a specified price and
within, or at, a specified period of time. As a writer of
options, AIGFP generally receives an option premium and then
manages the risk of any unfavorable change in the value of the
underlying commodity, currency or index by entering into
offsetting transactions with third-party market participants.
Risks arise as a result of movements in current market prices
from contracted prices, and the potential inability of the
counterparties to meet their obligations under the contracts.
The following table presents AIGFP futures, forward and
option contracts portfolio by maturity and type of
derivative:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining Life of Notional Amount at December 31,
2008
|
|
|
Notional Amount
|
|
|
|
One
|
|
|
Two Through
|
|
|
Six Through
|
|
|
After Ten
|
|
|
at December 31,
|
|
|
|
Year
|
|
|
Five Years
|
|
|
Ten Years
|
|
|
Years
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Exchange traded futures and options contracts contractual amount
|
|
$
|
11,239
|
|
|
$
|
509
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,748
|
|
|
$
|
28,947
|
|
Over the counter forward contracts contractual amount
|
|
|
37,477
|
|
|
|
4,046
|
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
43,032
|
|
|
|
493,046
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
48,716
|
|
|
$
|
4,555
|
|
|
$
|
1,509
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
54,780
|
|
|
$
|
521,993
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIGFP
Hedging Program
During 2007, AIGFP designated certain interest rate swaps as
fair value hedges of the benchmark interest rate risk on certain
of its interest bearing financial assets and liabilities. In
these hedging relationships, AIG hedged its fixed rate available
for sale securities and fixed rate borrowings. AIGFP also
designated foreign currency forward contracts as fair value
hedges for changes in spot foreign exchange rates of its
non-U.S. dollar
denominated available for sale debt securities. Under these
strategies, all or portions of individual or multiple
derivatives could be designated against a single hedged item.
At inception of each hedging relationship, AIGFP performed and
documented its prospective assessments of hedge effectiveness to
demonstrate that the hedge was expected to be highly effective.
For hedges of interest rate risk, AIGFP used regression analysis
to demonstrate the hedge was highly effective, while it used the
periodic dollar
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 263
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
offset method for its foreign currency hedges. AIGFP used the
periodic dollar offset method to assess whether its hedging
relationships were highly effective on a retrospective basis.
The prospective and retrospective assessments were updated on a
daily basis. The passage of time component of the hedging
instruments and the forward points on foreign currency hedges
were excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness and
measurement of hedge ineffectiveness. AIGFP did not utilize the
shortcut, matched terms or equivalent methods to assess hedge
effectiveness.
The change in fair value of the derivatives that qualified under
the requirements of FAS 133 as fair value hedges was
recorded in current period earnings along with the gain or loss
on the hedged item for the hedged risks. For interest rate
hedges, the adjustments to the carrying value of the hedged
items were amortized into income using the effective yield
method over the remaining life of the hedged item. Amounts
excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness were
recognized in current period earnings. For the year ended
December 31, 2007, AIGFP recognized net losses of
$0.7 million in earnings, representing hedge
ineffectiveness, and also recognized net losses of
$456 million related to the portion of the hedging
instruments excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness.
Since its election of the Fair Value Option under SFAS 159
on January 1, 2008, AIGFP no longer designates any
derivatives as hedging relationships qualifying for hedge
accounting under FAS 133 under this hedging program.
For the year ended December 31, 2006. AIGFP did not
designate any derivatives as hedging relationships under
FAS 133.
AIG
Hedging Intermediated by AIGFP
In 2008 and 2007, AIG designated certain AIGFP derivatives as
either fair value or cash flow hedges of certain debt issued by
AIG, Inc. (including MIP), ILFC and AGF. The fair value hedges
included (i) interest rate swaps that were designated as
hedges of the change in the fair value of fixed rate debt
attributable to changes in the benchmark interest rate and
(ii) foreign currency swaps designated as hedges of the
change in fair value of foreign currency denominated debt
attributable to changes in foreign exchange rates
and/or the
benchmark interest rate. With respect to the cash flow hedges,
(i) interest rate swaps were designated as hedges of the
changes in cash flows on floating rate debt attributable to
changes in the benchmark interest rate, and (ii) foreign
currency swaps were designated as hedges of changes in cash
flows on foreign currency denominated debt attributable to
changes in the benchmark interest rate and foreign exchange
rates.
AIG assesses, both at the hedges inception and on an
ongoing basis, whether the derivatives used in hedging
transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in fair
values or cash flows of hedged items. Regression analysis is
employed to assess the effectiveness of these hedges both on a
prospective and retrospective basis. AIG does not utilize the
shortcut, matched terms or equivalent methods to assess hedge
effectiveness.
The change in fair value of derivatives designated and effective
as fair value hedges along with the gain or loss on the hedged
item are recorded in current period earnings. Upon
discontinuation of hedge accounting, the cumulative adjustment
to the carrying value of the hedged item resulting from changes
in the benchmark interest rate or exchange rate is amortized
into income using the effective yield method over the remaining
life of the hedged item. Amounts excluded from the assessment of
hedge effectiveness are recognized in current period earnings.
During the year ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, AIG
recognized a loss of $61 million and $1 million,
respectively, in earnings related to the ineffective portion of
the hedging instruments. During the year ended December 31,
2008 and 2007, AIG also recognized gains of $17 million and
$3 million, respectively, related to the change in the
hedging instruments forward points excluded from the assessment
of hedge effectiveness.
The effective portion of the change in fair value of a
derivative qualifying as a cash flow hedge is recorded in
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), until earnings
are affected by the variability of cash flows in the hedged
item. The ineffective portion of these hedges is recorded in net
realized capital gains (losses). AIG recognized losses of
$13 million and gains of $1 million in earnings
representing hedge ineffectiveness in 2008 and 2007,
respectively. At December 31, 2008, $115 million of
the deferred net loss in Accumulated other
264 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
comprehensive income is expected to be recognized in earnings
during the next 12 months. All components of the
derivatives gains and losses were included in the
assessment of hedge effectiveness. There were no instances of
the discontinuation of hedge accounting in 2008 and 2007.
AIGFP
Written Super Senior and Single Name Credit Default
Swaps
AIGFP entered into credit derivative transactions in the
ordinary course of its business, with the intention of earning
revenue on credit exposure in an unfunded form. In the majority
of AIGFPs credit derivative transactions, AIGFP sold
credit protection on a designated portfolio of loans or debt
securities. Generally, AIGFP provides such credit protection on
a second loss basis, meaning that AIGFP would incur
credit losses only after a shortfall of principal
and/or
interest, or other credit events, in respect of the protected
loans and debt securities, exceeds a specified threshold amount
or level of first losses.
Typically, the credit risk associated with a designated
portfolio of loans or debt securities has been tranched into
different layers of risk, which are then analyzed and rated by
the credit rating agencies. At origination, there is usually an
equity layer covering the first credit losses in respect of the
portfolio up to a specified percentage of the total portfolio,
and then successive layers ranging generally from a BBB-rated
layer to one or more AAA-rated layers. A significant majority of
AIGFP transactions were rated by rating agencies have risk
layers or tranches rated AAA at origination and are immediately
junior to the threshold level above which AIGFPs payment
obligation would generally arise. In transactions that were not
rated, AIGFP applied equivalent risk criteria for setting the
threshold level for its payment obligations. Therefore, the risk
layer assumed by AIGFP with respect to the designated portfolio
of loans or debt securities in these transactions is often
called the super senior risk layer, defined as a
layer of credit risk senior to one or more risk layers rated AAA
by the credit rating agencies, or if the transaction is not
rated, structured to the equivalent thereto. The expected
weighted average maturity of AIGFPs super senior credit
derivative portfolios as of December 31, 2008 was
0.7 years for the Regulatory Capital Corporate portfolio,
1.2 years for the Regulatory Capital Residential Mortgage
portfolio, 7.8 years for the Regulatory Capital Other
portfolio, 3.7 years for the Corporate Arbitrage portfolio
and 6.0 years for the Multi-Sector CDO portfolio.
The net notional amount, fair value of derivative liability
and unrealized market valuation loss of the AIGFP super senior
credit default swap portfolio, including credit default swaps
written on mezzanine tranches of certain regulatory capital
relief transactions, by asset class were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Unrealized Market
|
|
|
|
Net Notional Amount
|
|
|
Of Derivative
|
|
|
Valuation Loss
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
Liability at December 31,
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31(a),
|
|
|
|
2008(b)
|
|
|
2007(b)
|
|
|
2008(c)
|
|
|
2007(c)
|
|
|
2008(d)
|
|
|
2007(d)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Regulatory Capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate loans
|
|
$
|
125,628
|
|
|
$
|
229,313
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Prime residential mortgages
|
|
|
107,246
|
|
|
|
149,430
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other(e)
|
|
|
1,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
234,449
|
|
|
|
378,743
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
379
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arbitrage:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-sector CDOs(f)
|
|
|
12,556
|
|
|
|
78,205
|
|
|
|
5,906
|
|
|
|
11,246
|
|
|
|
25,700
|
|
|
|
11,246
|
|
Corporate debt/CLO(g)
|
|
|
50,495
|
|
|
|
70,425
|
|
|
|
2,554
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
2,328
|
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
63,051
|
|
|
|
148,630
|
|
|
|
8,460
|
|
|
|
11,472
|
|
|
|
28,028
|
|
|
|
11,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mezzanine tranches(h)
|
|
|
4,701
|
|
|
|
5,770
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
302,201
|
|
|
$
|
533,143
|
|
|
$
|
9,034
|
|
|
$
|
11,472
|
|
|
$
|
28,602
|
|
|
$
|
11,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
There were no unrealized market valuation losses in 2006. |
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 265
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Net notional amounts presented are net of all structural
subordination below the covered tranches. |
|
(c) |
|
Fair value amounts are shown before the effects of
counterparty netting adjustments and offsetting cash collateral
in accordance with FIN 39. |
|
(d) |
|
Includes credit valuation adjustment gains of
$185 million in 2008 representing the positive effect of
offsetting AIGs widening credit spreads on the valuation
of the derivatives liabilities. AIGFP began reflecting this
valuation adjustment as a result of the adoption of
SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008. Prior to January 1,
2008, a credit valuation adjustment was not reflected in the
valuation of AIGFPs liabilities. |
|
(e) |
|
During 2008, a European RMBS regulatory capital relief
transaction was not terminated as expected when it no longer
provided regulatory capital relief to the counterparty as a
result of arbitrage opportunities arising from its unique
attributes and the counterpartys access to a particular
funding source. |
|
(f) |
|
In connection with the terminations of CDS transactions in
respect of the ML III transaction, AIG Financial Products
Corp. paid $32.5 billion through the surrender of
collateral previously posted (net of the $2.5 billion
received pursuant to the shortfall agreement), of which
$2.5 billion (included in Other income (loss)) is related
to certain 2a-7 Put transactions written on multi-sector CDOs
purchased by ML III. |
|
(g) |
|
Includes $1.5 billion of credit default swaps written on
the super senior tranches of CLOs as of December 31,
2008. |
|
(h) |
|
Includes offsetting purchased CDS of $2.0 billion and
$2.7 billion in net notional amount at December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. |
At December 31, 2008, all outstanding CDS transactions for
regulatory capital purposes and the majority of the arbitrage
portfolio have cash-settled structures in respect of a basket of
reference obligations, where AIGFPs payment obligations
may be triggered by payment shortfalls, bankruptcy and certain
other events such as write-downs of the value of underlying
assets. For the remainder of the CDS transactions in respect of
the arbitrage portfolio, AIGFPs payment obligations are
triggered by the occurrence of a credit event under a single
reference security, and performance is limited to a single
payment by AIGFP in return for physical delivery by the
counterparty of the reference security. By contrast, at
December 31, 2007, under the large majority of CDS
transactions in respect of multi-sector CDOs, AIGFPs
payment obligations were triggered by the occurrence of a
non-payment event under a single reference CDO security, and
performance was limited to a single payment by AIGFP in return
for physical delivery by the counterparty of the reference
security.
A total of $234.4 billion (consisting of corporate loans
and prime residential mortgages) in net notional exposure of
AIGFPs super senior credit default swap portfolio as of
December 31, 2008 represented derivatives written for
financial institutions, principally in Europe, for the purpose
of providing regulatory capital relief rather than for arbitrage
purposes. In exchange for a periodic fee, the counterparties
receive credit protection with respect to a portfolio of
diversified loans they own, thus reducing their minimum capital
requirements. These CDS transactions were structured with early
termination rights for counterparties allowing them to terminate
these transactions at no cost to AIGFP at a certain period of
time or upon a regulatory event such as the implementation of
Basel II. During 2008, $99.7 billion in net notional amount
was terminated or matured. Through February 18, 2009, AIGFP
has also received formal termination notices for an additional
$26.5 billion in net notional amount with effective
termination dates in 2009.
The regulatory capital relief CDS transactions require cash
settlement and, other than for collateral posting, AIGFP is
required to make a payment in connection with a regulatory
capital relief transaction only if realized credit losses in
respect of the underlying portfolio exceed AIGFPs
attachment point.
The super senior tranches of these CDS transactions continue to
be supported by high levels of subordination, which, in most
instances, have increased since origination. The weighted
average subordination supporting the European residential
mortgage and corporate loan referenced portfolios at
December 31, 2008 was 12.7 percent and
18.3 percent, respectively. The highest level of realized
losses to date in any single residential mortgage and corporate
loan pool was 2.1 percent and 0.42 percent,
respectively. The corporate loan transactions are each comprised
of several hundred secured and unsecured loans diversified by
industry and, in some instances, by country, and have per-issuer
concentration limits. Both types of transactions generally allow
some substitution and
266 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
replenishment of loans, subject to defined constraints, as older
loans mature or are prepaid. These replenishment rights
generally mature within the first few years of the trade, after
which the proceeds of any prepaid or maturing loans are applied
first to the super senior tranche (sequentially), thereby
increasing the relative level of subordination supporting the
balance of AIGFPs super senior CDS exposure.
Given the current performance of the underlying portfolios, the
level of subordination and the expectation that counterparties
will terminate these transactions prior to their maturity, AIGFP
does not expect that it will be required to make payments
pursuant to the contractual terms of these transactions.
A total of $63.1 billion and $148.6 billion in net
notional exposure on AIGFPs super senior credit default
swaps as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively, are
arbitrage-motivated transactions written on multi-sector CDOs or
designated pools of investment grade senior unsecured corporate
debt or CLOs.
As described in Note 4, the ML III transaction eliminated
the vast majority of the super senior multi-sector CDO CDS
exposure.
The outstanding multi-sector CDO CDS portfolio at
December 31, 2008 were written on CDO transactions that
generally held a concentration of RMBS, CMBS and inner CDO
securities. Approximately $7.4 billion net notional amount
(fair value liability of $4.0 billion) of this portfolio
was written on super senior multi-sector CDOs that contain some
level of sub-prime RMBS collateral, with a concentration in the
2005 and earlier vintages of sub-prime RMBS. AIGFPs
portfolio also included both high grade and mezzanine CDOs.
The majority of multi-sector CDO CDS transactions require cash
settlement and, other than for collateral posting, AIGFP is
required to make a payment in connection with such transactions
only if realized credit losses in respect of the underlying
portfolio exceed AIGFPs attachment point. In the remainder
of the portfolio, AIGFPs payment obligations are triggered
by the occurrence of a credit event under a single reference
security, and performance is limited to a single payment by
AIGFP in return for physical delivery by the counterparty of the
reference security.
Included in the multi-sector CDO portfolio are
maturity-shortening puts that allow the holders of the
securities issued by certain CDOs to treat the securities as
short-term eligible
2a-7
investments under the Investment Company Act of 1940
(2a-7 Puts).
Holders of securities are required, in certain circumstances, to
tender their securities to the issuer at par. If an
issuers remarketing agent is unable to resell the
securities so tendered, AIGFP must purchase the securities at
par as long as the security has not experienced a payment
default or certain bankruptcy events with respect to the issuer
of such security have not occurred. At December 31, 2008
and 2007,
2a-7 Puts
with a net notional amount of $1.7 billion and
$6.5 billion, respectively, were outstanding.
$252 million of the 2008 amount may be exercised in 2009
and ML III has agreed to not sell the multi-sector CDOs in 2009
and to either not exercise its put option on such multi-sector
CDOs or to simultaneously exercise their par put option with a
par purchase of the multi-sector CDO securities. In exchange,
AIG Financial Products Corp. agreed to pay to ML III the
consideration that it received for providing the put protection.
The corporate arbitrage portfolio consists principally of CDS
transactions written on portfolios of senior unsecured corporate
obligations that were generally rated investment grade at
inception of the CDS. These CDS transactions require cash
settlement. Also, included in this portfolio are CDS
transactions with a net notional of $1.5 billion written on
the senior part of the capital structure of CLOs, which require
cash settlement upon the occurrence of a credit event.
Certain of the super senior credit default swaps provide the
counterparties with an additional termination right if
AIGs rating level falls to BBB or Baa2. At that level,
counterparties to the CDS transactions with a net notional
amount of $38.6 billion at December 31, 2008 have the
right to terminate the transactions early. If counterparties
exercise this right, the contracts provide for the
counterparties to be compensated for the cost to replace the
transactions, or an amount reasonably determined in good faith
to estimate the losses the counterparties would incur as a
result of the termination of the transactions.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 267
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Given the level of uncertainty in estimating both the number of
counterparties who may elect to exercise their right to
terminate and the payment that may be triggered in connection
with any such exercise, AIG is unable to reasonably estimate the
aggregate amount that it would be required to pay under the
super senior credit default swaps in the event of any credit
rating downgrade below AIGs current ratings.
Due to long-term maturities of the CDS in the arbitrage
portfolio, AIG is unable to make reasonable estimates of the
periods during which any payments would be made. However, the
net notional amount represents the maximum exposure to loss on
the super senior credit default swap portfolio.
Most of AIGFPs credit default swaps are subject to
collateral posting provisions, which typically are governed by
International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. (ISDA)
Master Agreements and Credit Support Annexes. These provisions
differ among counterparties and asset classes. Although AIGFP
has collateral posting obligations associated with both
regulatory capital relief transactions and arbitrage
transactions, the large majority of these obligations to date
have been associated with arbitrage transactions in respect of
multi-sector CDOs.
AIGFP has received collateral calls from counterparties in
respect of certain super senior credit default swaps, of which a
large majority relate to multi-sector CDOs. To a lesser extent,
AIGFP has also received collateral calls in respect of certain
super senior credit default swaps entered into by counterparties
for regulatory capital relief purposes and in respect of
corporate arbitrage.
The amount of future collateral posting requirements is a
function of AIGs credit ratings, the rating of the
reference obligations and any further decline in the market
value of the relevant reference obligations, with the latter
being the most significant factor. While a high level of
correlation exists between the amount of collateral posted and
the valuation of these contracts in respect of the arbitrage
portfolio, a similar relationship does not exist with respect to
the regulatory capital portfolio given the nature of how the
amount of collateral for these transactions is determined. Given
the severe market disruption, lack of observable data and the
uncertainty regarding the potential effects on market prices of
measures recently undertaken by the federal government to
address the credit market disruption, AIGFP is unable to
reasonably estimate the amounts of collateral that it may be
required to post.
Collateral amounts under Master Agreements may be netted against
one another where the counterparties are each exposed to one
another in respect of different transactions. Actual collateral
postings with respect to Master Agreements may be affected by
other agreed terms, including threshold and independent amounts,
that may increase or decrease the amount of collateral posted.
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007 the amount of collateral
postings with respect to AIGFPs super senior credit
default swap portfolio (prior to offsets for other transactions)
was $8.8 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively.
AIGFP has also entered into credit default swap contracts
referencing single-name exposures written on corporate, index,
and asset-backed credits, with the intention of earning spread
income on credit exposure in an unfunded form. Some of these
transactions were entered into as part of a long short strategy
allowing AIGFP to earn the net spread between CDS they wrote and
ones they purchased.
As of December 31, 2008, the notional of written CDS
contracts was $6.3 billion, with an average credit rating
of BBB. AIGFP has hedged these exposures by purchasing
offsetting CDS contracts of $3.0 billion in net notional
amount with identical reference obligations. The net unhedged
position of approximately $3.3 billion represents the
maximum exposure to loss on these CDS contacts. The average
maturity of the written CDS contracts is 4 years. As of
December 31, 2008, the fair value (which represents the
carrying value) of the portfolio of CDS was $(1.0) billion.
Upon a triggering event (e.g., a default) with respect to the
underlying credit, AIGFP would normally have the option to
settle the position through an auction process (cash settle) or
pay the notional of the contract to the counterparty in exchange
for a bond issued by the underlying credit (physical settle).
AIGFP transacted these written CDS contracts under ISDA
agreements. The majority of these ISDA agreements include credit
support annex provisions, which provide for collateral postings
at various ratings and threshold levels. At December 31,
2008, AIGFP had posted $1.2 billion of collateral under
these contracts.
268 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Non-AIGFP
Derivatives
AIG and its subsidiaries (other than AIGFP) also use derivatives
and other instruments as part of their financial risk management
programs. Interest rate derivatives (such as interest rate
swaps) are used to manage interest rate risk associated with
investments in fixed income securities, commercial paper
issuances, medium- and long-term note offerings, and other
interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities. In addition,
foreign exchange derivatives (principally cross currency swaps,
forwards and options) are used to economically mitigate risk
associated with
non-U.S. dollar
denominated debt, net capital exposures and foreign exchange
transactions. The derivatives are effective economic hedges of
the exposures they are meant to offset.
In addition to hedging activities, AIG also uses derivative
instruments with respect to investment operations, which
include, among other things, credit default swaps, and
purchasing investments with embedded derivatives, such as equity
linked notes and convertible bonds. All changes in the fair
value of these derivatives are recorded in earnings. AIG
bifurcates an embedded derivative where: (i) the economic
characteristics of the embedded instruments are not clearly and
closely related to those of the remaining components of the
financial instrument; (ii) the contract that embodies both
the embedded derivative instrument and the host contract is not
remeasured at fair value; and (iii) a separate instrument
with the same terms as the embedded instrument meets the
definition of a derivative under FAS 133.
Matched
Investment Program Written Credit Default Swaps
The Matched Investment Program (MIP) has entered into CDS
contracts as a writer of protection, with the intention of
earning spread income on credit exposure in an unfunded form.
The portfolio of CDS contracts are single-name exposures and, at
inception, are predominantly high grade corporate credits.
The MIP invested in written CDS contracts through an affiliate
which then transacts directly with unaffiliated third parties
under ISDA agreements. As of December 31, 2008, the
notional amount of written CDS contracts was $4.1 billion
with an average credit rating of BBB+. The average maturity of
the written CDS contracts is March 2012, or 3.3 years. As
of December 31, 2008, the fair value (which represents the
carrying value) of the MIPs written CDS was
$(351) million.
The majority of the ISDA agreements include credit support annex
provisions, which provide for collateral postings at various
ratings and threshold levels. At December 31, 2008,
$128.9 million of collateral was posted for CDS contracts
related to the MIP. The notional amount represents the maximum
exposure to loss on the written CDS contracts. However, due to
the average investment grade rating and expected default
recovery rates, actual losses are expected to be less. AIG
Investments, as investment manager for MIP, manages the credit
exposure through its corporate credit risk process.
Upon a triggering event (e.g., a default) with respect to the
underlying credit, the MIP would normally have the option to
settle the position through an auction process (cash settlement)
or pay the notional amount of the contract to the counterparty
in exchange for a bond issued by the underlying credit (physical
settlement).
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 269
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
11.
|
Liability
for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense and Future
policy benefits for life and accident and health insurance
contracts and policyholder contract deposits
|
The reconciliation of activity in the liability for unpaid
claims and claims adjustment expense was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
At beginning of year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense
|
|
$
|
85,500
|
|
|
$
|
79,999
|
|
|
$
|
77,169
|
|
Reinsurance recoverable
|
|
|
(16,212
|
)
|
|
|
(17,369
|
)
|
|
|
(19,693
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
69,288
|
|
|
|
62,630
|
|
|
|
57,476
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange effect
|
|
|
(2,113
|
)
|
|
|
955
|
|
|
|
741
|
|
Acquisitions and dispositions(a)
|
|
|
(269
|
)
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expenses incurred:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year
|
|
|
35,085
|
|
|
|
30,261
|
|
|
|
27,805
|
|
Prior years, other than accretion of discount(b)
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
(656
|
)
|
|
|
(53
|
)
|
Prior years, accretion of discount
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
327
|
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
35,520
|
|
|
|
29,932
|
|
|
|
28,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses and loss expenses paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current year
|
|
|
13,440
|
|
|
|
9,684
|
|
|
|
8,368
|
|
Prior years
|
|
|
16,531
|
|
|
|
14,862
|
|
|
|
15,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
29,971
|
|
|
|
24,546
|
|
|
|
23,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At end of year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense
|
|
|
72,455
|
|
|
|
69,288
|
|
|
|
62,630
|
|
Reinsurance recoverable
|
|
|
16,803
|
|
|
|
16,212
|
|
|
|
17,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
89,258
|
|
|
$
|
85,500
|
|
|
$
|
79,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) Reflects the closing balance with respect to Unibanco
divested in the fourth quarter of 2008 and the opening balance
with respect to the acquisitions of WüBa and the Central
Insurance Co., Ltd. in 2007 and 2006, respectively.
(b) Includes $88 million and $181 million in 2007 and 2006,
respectively, for the general reinsurance operations of
Transatlantic and, $7 million, $64 million and $103 million of
losses incurred in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively, resulting
from the 2005 and 2004 catastrophes.
Discounting
of Reserves
At December 31, 2008, AIGs overall General Insurance
net loss reserves reflect a loss reserve discount of
$2.57 billion, including tabular and non-tabular
calculations. The tabular workers compensation discount is
calculated using a 3.5 percent interest rate and the
1979-81
Decennial Mortality Table. The non-tabular workers
compensation discount is calculated separately for companies
domiciled in New York and Pennsylvania, and follows the
statutory regulations for each state. For New York companies,
the discount is based on a five percent interest rate and the
companies own payout patterns. For Pennsylvania companies,
the statute has specified discount factors for accident years
2001 and prior, which are based on a six percent interest rate
and an industry payout pattern. For accident years 2002 and
subsequent, the discount is based on the payout patterns and
investment yields of the companies.
270 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The analysis of the future policy benefits and policyholder
contract deposits liabilities was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Future policy benefits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long duration contracts
|
|
$
|
141,623
|
|
|
$
|
135,521
|
|
Short duration contracts
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
142,334
|
|
|
$
|
136,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policyholder contract deposits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Annuities
|
|
$
|
139,126
|
|
|
$
|
140,444
|
|
Guaranteed investment contracts
|
|
|
14,821
|
|
|
|
25,321
|
|
Universal life products
|
|
|
29,277
|
|
|
|
27,114
|
|
Variable products
|
|
|
24,965
|
|
|
|
46,407
|
|
Corporate life products
|
|
|
2,259
|
|
|
|
2,124
|
|
Other investment contracts
|
|
|
16,252
|
|
|
|
17,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
226,700
|
|
|
$
|
258,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long duration contract liabilities included in future policy
benefits, as presented in the preceding table, result primarily
from life products. Short duration contract liabilities are
primarily accident and health products. The liability for future
life policy benefits has been established based upon the
following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rates (exclusive of immediate/terminal funding
annuities), which vary by territory, year of issuance and
products, range from 1.0 percent to 11.0 percent
within the first 20 years. Interest rates on
immediate/terminal funding annuities are at a maximum of
11.5 percent and grade to not greater than 6.0 percent.
|
|
|
|
Mortality and surrender rates are based upon actual experience
by geographical area modified to allow for variations in policy
form. The weighted average lapse rate, including surrenders, for
individual and group life approximated 6.8 percent.
|
|
|
|
The portions of current and prior net income and of current
unrealized appreciation of investments that can inure to the
benefit of AIG are restricted in some cases by the insurance
contracts and by the local insurance regulations of the
jurisdictions in which the policies are in force.
|
|
|
|
Participating life business represented approximately
15 percent of the gross insurance in force at
December 31, 2008 and 21 percent of gross premiums and
other considerations in 2008. The amount of annual dividends to
be paid is determined locally by the boards of directors.
Provisions for future dividend payments are computed by
jurisdiction, reflecting local regulations.
|
The liability for policyholder contract deposits has been
established based on the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rates credited on deferred annuities, which vary by
territory and year of issuance, range from 1.4 percent to,
including bonuses, 13.0 percent. Less than 1.0 percent
of the liabilities are credited at a rate greater than
9.0 percent. Current declared interest rates are generally
guaranteed to remain in effect for a period of one year though
some are guaranteed for longer periods. Withdrawal charges
generally range from zero percent to 12.0 percent grading
to zero over a period of zero to 15 years.
|
|
|
|
Domestically, guaranteed investment contracts (GICs) have market
value withdrawal provisions for any funds withdrawn other than
benefit responsive payments. Interest rates credited generally
range from 1.2 percent to 9.0 percent. The vast
majority of these GICs mature within three years.
|
|
|
|
Interest rates on corporate life insurance products are
guaranteed at 4.0 percent and the weighted average rate
credited in 2008 was 5.0 percent.
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 271
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
The universal life funds have credited interest rates of
1.0 percent to 5.8 percent and guarantees ranging from
1.0 percent to 5.5 percent depending on the year of
issue. Additionally, universal life funds are subject to
surrender charges that amount to 13.0 percent of the
aggregate fund balance grading to zero over a period not longer
than 20 years.
|
|
|
|
For variable products and investment contracts, policy values
are expressed in terms of investment units. Each unit is linked
to an asset portfolio. The value of a unit increases or
decreases based on the value of the linked asset portfolio. The
current liability at any time is the sum of the current unit
value of all investment units plus any liability for guaranteed
minimum death or withdrawal benefits.
|
Certain products are subject to experience adjustments. These
include group life and group medical products, credit life
contracts, accident and health insurance contracts/riders
attached to life policies and, to a limited extent, reinsurance
agreements with other direct insurers. Ultimate premiums from
these contracts are estimated and recognized as revenue, and the
unearned portions of the premiums recorded as liabilities.
Experience adjustments vary according to the type of contract
and the territory in which the policy is in force and are
subject to local regulatory guidance.
|
|
12.
|
Variable
Life and Annuity Contracts
|
AIG follows Statement of Position
03-1
(SOP 03-1),
which requires recognition of a liability for guaranteed minimum
death benefits and other living benefits related to variable
annuity and variable life contracts as well as certain
disclosures for these products.
AIG reports variable contracts through separate accounts when
investment income and investment gains and losses accrue
directly to, and investment risk is borne by, the contract
holder (traditional variable annuities), and the separate
account qualifies for separate account treatment under
SOP 03-1.
In some foreign jurisdictions, separate accounts are not legally
insulated from general account creditors and therefore do not
qualify for separate account treatment under
SOP 03-1.
In such cases, the variable contracts are reported as general
account contracts even though the policyholder bears the risks
associated with the performance of the assets. AIG also reports
variable annuity and life contracts through separate accounts,
or general accounts when not qualified for separate account
reporting, when AIG contractually guarantees to the contract
holder (variable contracts with guarantees) either
(a) total deposits made to the contract less any partial
withdrawals plus a minimum return (and in minor instances, no
minimum returns) (Net Deposits Plus a Minimum Return) or
(b) the highest contract value attained, typically on any
anniversary date minus any subsequent withdrawals following the
contract anniversary (Highest Contract Value Attained). These
guarantees include benefits that are payable in the event of
death, annuitization, or, in other instances, at specified dates
during the accumulation period. Such benefits are referred to as
guaranteed minimum death benefits (GMDB), guaranteed minimum
income benefits (GMIB), guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits
(GMWB) and guaranteed minimum account value benefits (GMAV). For
AIG, GMDB is by far the most widely offered benefit.
The assets supporting the variable portion of both traditional
variable annuities and variable contracts with guarantees are
carried at fair value and reported as Separate account assets
with an equivalent summary total reported as Separate account
liabilities when the separate account qualifies for separate
account treatment under
SOP 03-1.
Assets for separate accounts that do not qualify for separate
account treatment are reported as trading account assets, and
liabilities are included in the respective policyholder
liability account of the general account. Amounts assessed
against the contract holders for mortality, administrative, and
other services are included in revenue and changes in
liabilities for minimum guarantees are included in policyholder
benefits and claims incurred in the consolidated statement of
income. Separate account net investment income, net investment
gains and losses, and the related liability changes are offset
within the same line item in the consolidated statement of
income for those accounts that qualify for separate account
treatment under
SOP 03-1.
Net investment income and gains and losses on trading accounts
for contracts that do not qualify for separate account treatment
under
SOP 03-1
are reported in net investment income and are principally offset
by amounts reported in policyholder benefits and claims incurred.
272 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The vast majority of AIGs exposure on guarantees made
to variable contract holders arises from GMDB. Details
concerning AIGs GMDB exposures were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Deposits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plus a Minimum
|
|
|
Highest Contract
|
|
|
|
Return
|
|
|
Value Attained
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in billions)
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account value(a)
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
Amount at risk(b)
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Average attained age of contract holders by product
|
|
|
38 - 69 years
|
|
|
|
55 - 71 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of guaranteed minimum return rates
|
|
|
3 - 10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account value(a)
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
Amount at risk(b)
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Average attained age of contract holders by product
|
|
|
38 - 69 years
|
|
|
|
55 - 72 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of guaranteed minimum return rates
|
|
|
3 - 10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Included in Policyholder contract deposits in the
consolidated balance sheet. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Represents the amount of death benefit currently in excess of
Account value. |
The following summarizes GMDB liabilities for guarantees on
variable contracts reflected in the general account.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
463
|
|
|
$
|
406
|
|
Reserve increase
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
|
111
|
|
Benefits paid
|
|
|
(97
|
)
|
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of year
|
|
$
|
717
|
|
|
$
|
463
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The GMDB liability is determined each period end by estimating
the expected value of death benefits in excess of the projected
account balance and recognizing the excess ratably over the
accumulation period based on total expected assessments. AIG
regularly evaluates estimates used and adjusts the additional
liability balance, with a related charge or credit to benefit
expense, if actual experience or other evidence suggests that
earlier assumptions should be revised.
The following assumptions and methodology were used to determine
the GMDB liability at December 31, 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
Data used was up to 1,000 stochastically generated investment
performance scenarios.
|
|
|
|
Mean investment performance assumptions ranged from three
percent to approximately ten percent depending on the block of
business.
|
|
|
|
Volatility assumptions ranged from eight percent to
23 percent depending on the block of business.
|
|
|
|
Mortality was assumed at between 50 percent and
103 percent of various life and annuity mortality tables.
|
|
|
|
For domestic contracts, lapse rates vary by contract type and
duration and ranged from zero percent to 40 percent. For
foreign contracts, lapse rates ranged from zero percent to
15 percent depending on the type of contract.
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 273
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
For domestic contracts, the discount rate ranged from
3.25 percent to 11 percent. For foreign contracts, the
discount rate ranged from 1.6 percent to seven percent.
|
In addition to GMDB, AIGs contracts currently include to a
lesser extent GMIB. The GMIB liability is determined each period
end by estimating the expected value of the annuitization
benefits in excess of the projected account balance at the date
of annuitization and recognizing the excess ratably over the
accumulation period based on total expected assessments. AIG
periodically evaluates estimates used and adjusts the additional
liability balance, with a related charge or credit to benefit
expense, if actual experience or other evidence suggests that
earlier assumptions should be revised.
AIG contracts currently include GMAV and GMWB benefits. GMAV and
GMWB considered to be embedded derivatives are recognized at
fair value through earnings. AIG enters into derivative
contracts to economically hedge a portion of the exposure that
arises from GMAV and GMWB.
AIGs total debt outstanding was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Fed Facility
|
|
$
|
40,431
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Other long-term debt
|
|
|
137,054
|
|
|
|
162,935
|
|
Commercial paper and extendible commercial notes
|
|
|
613
|
|
|
|
13,114
|
|
NY Fed commercial paper funding facility
|
|
|
15,105
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total debt
|
|
$
|
193,203
|
|
|
$
|
176,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
274 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Maturities of long-term debt, excluding borrowings of
consolidated investments, are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
AIG:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fed Facility
|
|
$
|
40,431
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
40,431
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
11,756
|
|
|
|
1,418
|
|
|
|
1,350
|
|
|
|
562
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
7,401
|
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
11,685
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,685
|
|
Junior subordinated debt attributable to equity units
|
|
|
5,880
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,880
|
|
Loans and mortgages payable
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
338
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
MIP matched notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
14,446
|
|
|
|
1,156
|
|
|
|
2,235
|
|
|
|
3,111
|
|
|
|
2,157
|
|
|
|
877
|
|
|
|
4,910
|
|
AIGFP matched notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
4,660
|
|
|
|
255
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total AIG
|
|
|
89,274
|
|
|
|
2,833
|
|
|
|
3,627
|
|
|
|
3,705
|
|
|
|
2,245
|
|
|
|
42,644
|
|
|
|
34,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIGFP, at fair value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GIAs
|
|
|
13,860
|
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
768
|
|
|
|
282
|
|
|
|
410
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
10,834
|
|
Notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
5,250
|
|
|
|
2,630
|
|
|
|
762
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
625
|
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
|
977
|
|
Loans and mortgages payable
|
|
|
2,175
|
|
|
|
1,175
|
|
|
|
324
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
211
|
|
Hybrid financial instrument liabilities(a)
|
|
|
2,113
|
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
|
241
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
|
1,075
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total AIGFP
|
|
|
23,398
|
|
|
|
5,187
|
|
|
|
2,092
|
|
|
|
895
|
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
|
|
806
|
|
|
|
13,097
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIGLH notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
798
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities connected to trust preferred stock
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ILFC(b):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
20,051
|
|
|
|
3,178
|
|
|
|
4,003
|
|
|
|
4,380
|
|
|
|
3,572
|
|
|
|
3,542
|
|
|
|
1,376
|
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
Export credit facility(c)
|
|
|
2,437
|
|
|
|
502
|
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
|
312
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
283
|
|
|
|
657
|
|
Bank financings
|
|
|
7,559
|
|
|
|
2,471
|
|
|
|
2,103
|
|
|
|
2,660
|
|
|
|
325
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ILFC
|
|
|
31,046
|
|
|
|
6,151
|
|
|
|
6,506
|
|
|
|
7,352
|
|
|
|
4,180
|
|
|
|
3,825
|
|
|
|
3,032
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AGF(b):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
23,089
|
|
|
|
6,636
|
|
|
|
4,112
|
|
|
|
3,172
|
|
|
|
2,079
|
|
|
|
1,979
|
|
|
|
5,111
|
|
Junior subordinated debt
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
349
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total AGF
|
|
|
23,438
|
|
|
|
6,636
|
|
|
|
4,112
|
|
|
|
3,172
|
|
|
|
2,079
|
|
|
|
1,979
|
|
|
|
5,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIGCFG Loans and mortgages payable(b)
|
|
|
1,596
|
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Other subsidiaries(b)
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
171,635
|
|
|
$
|
21,581
|
|
|
$
|
17,492
|
|
|
$
|
15,212
|
|
|
$
|
9,865
|
|
|
$
|
49,292
|
|
|
$
|
58,193
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 275
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Represents structured notes issued AIGFP that are accounted
for at fair value. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
AIG does not guarantee these borrowings. |
|
(c) |
|
Reflects future minimum payment for ILFCs borrowing
under Export Credit Facilities. |
AIG
(Parent Company)
(i) Fed Facility: On September 22,
2008, AIG entered into the $85 billion Fed Credit Agreement
and a Guarantee and Pledge Agreement (the Pledge Agreement) with
the NY Fed.
Pursuant to the Fed Credit Agreement, in consideration for the
NY Feds extension of credit under the Fed Facility and the
payment of $500,000, AIG agreed to issue 100,000 shares of
Series C Preferred Stock. See Note 15 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion of the
Series C Preferred Stock.
On November 9, 2008, AIG and the NY Fed amended the Fed
Credit Agreement with effect from November 25, 2008. The
amended Fed Credit Agreement provides, among other things, that
(i) the total commitment under the Fed Facility following
the issuance of the Series D Preferred Stock is
$60 billion; (ii) the interest rate payable on
outstanding borrowings is three-month LIBOR (not less than
3.5 percent) plus 3.0 percent per annum;
(iii) the fee payable on undrawn amounts is
0.75 percent per annum; and (iv) the term of the Fed
Facility is five years. See Note 15 herein for further
discussion of the Series D Preferred Stock. At
December 31, 2008, a total of $40.4 billion was
outstanding under the Fed Facility, including commitment fees
and accrued compounding interest of $3.63 billion.
The Fed Facility is secured by pledges of the capital stock and
assets of certain of AIGs subsidiaries, subject to
exclusions of certain property not permitted to be pledged under
the debt agreements of AIG and certain of its subsidiaries and
AIGs Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as well as
exclusions of assets of regulated subsidiaries, assets of
foreign subsidiaries and assets of special purpose vehicles. The
exclusion of the capital stock of certain direct subsidiaries of
AIG from AIGs pledge ensures that AIG has not pledged all
or substantially all of its assets to the NY Fed.
AIG has not had access to its traditional sources of long-term
financing through the public debt market.
(ii) Notes and bonds payable: On
August 18, 2008, AIG sold $3.25 billion principal
amount of senior unsecured notes in a
Rule 144A/Regulation S offering which bear interest at
a per annum rate of 8.25 percent and mature in 2018. The
proceeds from the sale of these notes were used by AIGFP for its
general corporate purposes, and the notes are included within
AIGFP matched notes and bonds payable in the
preceding tables. AIG has agreed to use commercially reasonable
efforts to consummate an exchange offer for the notes pursuant
to an effective registration statement within 360 days of
the date on which the notes were issued.
As of December 31, 2008, approximately $7.5 billion
principal amount of senior notes were outstanding under
AIGs medium-term note program, of which $3.2 billion
was used for AIGs general corporate purposes,
$893 million was used by AIGFP (included within AIGFP
matched notes bonds and payable in the preceding tables)
and $3.4 billion was used to fund the MIP. The maturity
dates of these notes range from 2009 to 2052. To the extent
considered appropriate, AIG may enter into swap transactions to
manage its effective borrowing rates with respect to these notes.
As of December 31, 2008, the equivalent of
$12.0 billion of notes were outstanding under AIGs
Euro medium-term note program, of which $9.7 billion were
used to fund the MIP and the remainder was used for AIGs
general corporate purposes. The aggregate amount outstanding
includes a $588 million loss resulting from foreign
exchange translation into U.S. dollars, of which
$0.1 million gain relates to notes issued by AIG for
general corporate purposes and $588 million loss relates to
notes issued to fund the MIP. AIG has economically hedged the
currency exposure arising from its foreign currency denominated
notes.
276 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
AIG maintains a shelf registration statement in Japan, providing
for the issuance of up to Japanese Yen 300 billion
principal amount of senior notes, of which the equivalent of
$562 million was outstanding at December 31, 2008.
(iii) Junior subordinated debt: During
2007 and 2008, AIG issued an aggregate of $12.5 billion of
junior subordinated debentures denominated in U.S. dollars,
British Pounds and Euros in eight series of securities. In
connection with each series of junior subordinated debentures,
AIG entered into a Replacement Capital Covenant (RCC) for the
benefit of the holders of AIGs 6.25 percent senior
notes due 2036. The RCCs provide that AIG will not repay,
redeem, or purchase the applicable series of junior subordinated
debentures on or before a specified date, unless AIG has
received qualifying proceeds from the sale of replacement
capital securities.
In May 2008, AIG raised a total of approximately
$20 billion through the sale of
(i) 196,710,525 shares of AIG common stock in a public
offering at a price per share of $38;
(ii) 78.4 million Equity Units in a public offering at
a price per unit of $75; and (iii) $6.9 billion in
unregistered offerings of junior subordinated debentures in
three series. The Equity Units and junior subordinated
debentures receive hybrid equity treatment from the major rating
agencies under their current policies but are recorded as
long-term debt on the consolidated balance sheet. The Equity
Units consist of an ownership interest in AIG junior
subordinated debentures and a stock purchase contract obligating
the holder of an equity unit to purchase, and obligating AIG to
sell, a variable number of shares of AIG common stock on three
dates in 2011 (a minimum of 128,944,480 shares and a
maximum of 154,738,080 shares, subject to anti-dilution
adjustments).
AIGFP
Borrowings under obligations of guaranteed investment
agreements: Borrowings under obligations of GIAs,
which are guaranteed by AIG, are recorded at fair value.
Obligations may be called at various times prior to maturity at
the option of the counterparty. Interest rates on these
borrowings are primarily fixed, vary by maturity, and range up
to 9.8 percent.
At December 31, 2008, the fair value of securities pledged
as collateral with respect to these obligations approximated
$8.4 billion.
AIGFPs debt, excluding GIAs, outstanding are as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Range of
|
|
U.S. Dollar
|
Range of Maturities
|
|
Currency
|
|
Interest Rates
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
2009-2035
|
|
U.S. dollar
|
|
|
0.01-8.25
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,167
|
|
2009-2047
|
|
Euro
|
|
|
1.59-7.65
|
|
|
|
2,866
|
|
2009-2023
|
|
Japanese yen
|
|
|
0.01-2.50
|
|
|
|
2,205
|
|
2009-2015
|
|
Swiss franc
|
|
|
0.25-2.79
|
|
|
|
112
|
|
2009-2015
|
|
Australian dollar
|
|
|
0.01-2.65
|
|
|
|
107
|
|
2009-2012
|
|
Other
|
|
|
0.01-7.73
|
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,538
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIGFP economically hedges its notes and bonds. AIG guarantees
all of AIGFPs debt.
Hybrid financial instrument
liabilities: AIGFPs notes and bonds include
structured debt instruments whose payment terms are linked to
one or more financial or other indices (such as an equity index
or commodity index or another measure that is not considered to
be clearly and closely related to the debt instrument). These
notes contain embedded derivatives that otherwise would be
required to be accounted for separately under FAS 133. Upon
AIGs early adoption of FAS 155, AIGFP elected the
fair value option for these notes. The notes that are accounted
for using the fair value option are reported separately under
hybrid financial instrument liabilities at fair value.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 277
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
AIGLH
At December 31, 2008, AIGLH notes and bonds payable
aggregating $798 million were outstanding with maturity
dates ranging from 2010 to 2029 at interest rates from
6.625 percent to 7.50 percent. AIG guarantees the
notes and bonds of AIGLH.
Liabilities
Connected to Trust Preferred Stock
AIGLH issued Junior Subordinated Debentures (liabilities) to
certain trusts established by AIGLH, which represent the sole
assets of the trusts. The trusts have no independent operations.
The trusts issued mandatory redeemable preferred stock to
investors. The interest terms and payment dates of the
liabilities correspond to those of the preferred stock.
AIGLHs obligations with respect to the liabilities and
related agreements, when taken together, constitute a full and
unconditional guarantee by AIGLH of payments due on the
preferred securities. AIG guarantees the obligations of AIGLH
with respect to these liabilities and related agreements. The
liabilities are redeemable, under certain conditions, at the
option of AIGLH on a proportionate basis.
At December 31, 2008, the preferred stock outstanding
consisted of $300 million liquidation value of
8.5 percent preferred stock issued by American General
Capital II in June 2000, $500 million liquidation
value of 8.125 percent preferred stock issued by American
General Institutional Capital B in March 1997, and
$500 million liquidation value of 7.57 percent
preferred stock issued by American General Institutional Capital
A in December 1996.
ILFC
(i) Notes and bonds payable: At
December 31, 2008, notes aggregating $20.1 billion
were outstanding, consisting of $7.7 billion of term notes,
$12.4 billion of medium-term notes with maturities ranging
from 2009 to 2015 and interest rates ranging from
1.62 percent to 7.95 percent and $1.0 billion of
junior subordinated debt as discussed below. Notes aggregating
$4.1 billion are at floating interest rates and the
remainder are at fixed rates. ILFC enters into swap transactions
to manage its effective borrowing rates with respect to these
notes.
ILFC does not currently have access to its traditional sources
of long-term or short-term financing through the public debt
markets. ILFC currently has the capacity under its present
facilities and indentures to enter into secured financings in
excess of $5.0 billion.
As a well-known seasoned issuer, ILFC has an effective shelf
registration statement with the SEC. At December 31, 2008,
$6.9 billion of debt securities had been issued under this
registration statement. In addition, ILFC has a Euro medium-term
note program for $7.0 billion, under which
$2.3 billion in notes were outstanding at December 31,
2008. Notes issued under the Euro medium-term note program are
included in ILFC notes and bonds payable in the preceding table
of borrowings. ILFC has substantially eliminated the currency
exposure arising from foreign currency denominated notes by
hedging the note exposure through swaps.
(ii) Junior subordinated debt: In
December 2005, ILFC issued two tranches of junior subordinated
debt totaling $1.0 billion to underlie trust preferred
securities issued by a trust sponsored by ILFC. The
$600 million tranche has a call date of December 21,
2010 and the $400 million tranche has a call date of
December 21, 2015. Both tranches mature on
December 21, 2065. The $600 million tranche has a
fixed interest rate of 5.90 percent for the first five
years. The $400 million tranche has a fixed interest rate
of 6.25 percent for the first ten years. Both tranches have
interest rate adjustments if the call option is not exercised
based on a floating quarterly reset rate equal to the initial
credit spread plus the highest of
(i) 3-month
LIBOR,
(ii) 10-year
constant maturity treasury and
(iii) 30-year
constant maturity treasury.
(iii) Export credit facility: At
December 31, 2008, ILFC had $365 million outstanding
under a $4.3 billion Export Credit Facility (ECA) used in
the purchase of approximately 75 aircraft delivered through
2001. The interest rate varies from 5.75 percent to
5.86 percent on these amortizing ten-year borrowings
depending on the delivery date of the aircraft. The debt is
collateralized by a pledge of the shares of a subsidiary of
ILFC, which holds title to the aircraft financed under the
facility. This facility was guaranteed by various European
Export Credit Agencies.
278 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
At December 31, 2008, ILFC had $2.1 billion
outstanding under a similarly structured ECA under which it may
borrow up to a maximum of $3.6 billion for aircraft to be
delivered through May 31, 2009. The facility becomes
available as the various European Export Credit Agencies provide
their guarantees for aircraft based on a forward-looking
calendar, and the interest rate is determined through a bid
process. The interest rates are either LIBOR-based with spreads
ranging from (0.04) percent to 0.90 percent or at fixed
rates ranging from 4.2 percent to 4.7 percent. At
December 31, 2008, the interest rates of the loans
outstanding ranged from 2.51 percent to 4.71 percent.
The debt is collateralized by a pledge of shares of a subsidiary
of ILFC, which holds title to the aircraft financed under the
facility. Borrowings with respect to these facilities are
included in ILFCs notes and bonds payable in the preceding
table of borrowings.
Under these Export Credit Facilities, ILFC may be required to
segregate deposits and maintenance reserves for the financed
aircraft into separate accounts in connection with certain
credit rating downgrades. As a result of Moodys
October 3, 2008 downgrade of ILFCs long-term debt
rating to Baa1, ILFC received notice from the security trustees
of the facilities to segregate into separate accounts security
deposits and maintenance reserves related to aircraft funded
under the facility. ILFC had 90 days from the date of the
notice to comply, and subsequent to December 31, 2008, ILFC
segregated approximately $260 million of deposits and
maintenance reserves. Funds required to be segregated under the
facility agreements fluctuate with changes in deposits,
maintenance reserves and debt maturities related to the aircraft
funded under the facilities. Further credit rating declines
could impose additional restrictions under the Export Credit
Facilities including the requirement to segregate rental
payments and would require prior consent to withdraw funds from
the segregated account.
(iv) Bank financings: From time to time,
ILFC enters into various bank financings. At December 31,
2008, the total funded amount was $7.6 billion. The
financings mature through 2012. The interest rates are
LIBOR-based, with spreads ranging from 0.30 percent to
1.625 percent. At December 31, 2008, the interest
rates ranged from 2.15 percent to 4.36 percent.
AIG does not guarantee any of the debt obligations of ILFC.
AGF
(i) Notes and bonds payable: At
December 31, 2008, notes and bonds aggregating
$23.1 billion were outstanding with maturity dates ranging
from 2009 to 2031 at interest rates ranging from
0.23 percent to 9 percent. AGF has entered into swap
transactions to manage its effective borrowing rates with
respect to several of these notes and bonds.
(ii) Junior subordinated debt: At
December 31, 2008, junior subordinated debentures
aggregating $349 million were outstanding that mature in
January 2067. The debentures underlie a series of trust
preferred securities sold by a trust sponsored by AGF in a
Rule 144A/Regulation S offering. AGF can redeem the
debentures at par beginning in January 2017.
AIG does not guarantee any of the debt obligations of AGF but
has provided a capital support agreement for the benefit of
AGFs lenders under the AGF
364-Day
Syndicated Facility.
Both ILFC and AGF have drawn the full amount available under
their revolving credit facilities.
AIGs syndicated facilities contain a covenant requiring
AIG to maintain total shareholders equity (calculated on a
consolidated basis consistent with GAAP) of at least
$50 billion at all times. If AIG fails to maintain this
level of total shareholders equity at any time, it will
lose access to those facilities. Additionally, if an event of
default occurs under those facilities, including AIG failing to
maintain $50 billion of total shareholders equity at
any time, which causes the banks to terminate either of those
facilities, then AIG may be required to collateralize
approximately
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 279
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
$2.7 billion of letters of credit that AIG has obtained for
the benefit of its insurance subsidiaries so that these
subsidiaries may obtain statutory recognition of their
intercompany reinsurance transactions.
Other Notes, Bonds, Loans and Mortgages Payable, consisted of
the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Uncollateralized
|
|
|
Collateralized
|
|
|
|
Notes/Bonds/Loans
|
|
|
Loans and
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
Payable
|
|
|
Mortgages Payable
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
AIGCFG
|
|
$
|
1,596
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
AIG
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other subsidiaries
|
|
|
514
|
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2,526
|
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
Paper
Commercial paper issued and outstanding was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Discount
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Book
|
|
|
and Accrued
|
|
|
Face
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
Value
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
in Days
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
Commercial paper:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ILFC
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
|
3.51
|
%
|
|
|
57
|
|
AGF(a)
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
|
3.40
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
AIG Funding
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
|
3.19
|
|
|
|
39
|
|
AIGCC Taiwan(b)
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
|
1.48
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
AIGF Thailand(b)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
2.46
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total commercial paper
|
|
|
598
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
599
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CPFF:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIGFP(c)
|
|
|
6,802
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
6,812
|
|
|
|
3.84
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
ILFC(d)
|
|
|
1,691
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1,694
|
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
AIG Funding
|
|
|
6,612
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
6,627
|
|
|
|
2.82
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total CPFF
|
|
|
15,105
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
15,133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total(a)
|
|
$
|
15,703
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
15,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Excludes $15 million of extendible commercial notes. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Issued in local currencies at prevailing local interest
rates. |
|
(c) |
|
Carried at fair value. |
|
(d) |
|
On January 21, 2009, S&P downgraded ILFCs
short-term credit rating and, as a result, ILFC lost access to
the CPFF. |
At December 31, 2008, AIG did not guarantee the commercial
paper of any of its subsidiaries other than AIG Funding.
Commercial
Paper Funding Facility
AIG is participating in the CPFF. AIG Funding, Curzon Funding
LLC and Nightingale Finance LLC may issue up to approximately
$6.9 billion, $7.2 billion and $1.1 billion,
respectively, of commercial paper under the CPFF. ILFC
participated in the CPFF at December 31, 2008, and had
borrowed approximately $1.7 billion under the
280 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
program. On January 21, 2009, S&P downgraded
ILFCs short-term credit rating and, as a result, ILFC
could no longer participate in the CPFF. The $1.7 billion
ILFC had borrowed under the CPFF was due and paid on
January 28, 2009. As of December 31, 2008 and
February 18, 2009, the other three affiliates had borrowed
a total of approximately $14.5 billion and
$14 billion, respectively, under this facility. These AIG
affiliates are participating under the CPFFs standard
terms and conditions.
Proceeds from the issuance of the commercial paper under the
CPFF are used to refinance AIGs outstanding commercial
paper as it matures, meet other working capital needs and make
voluntary repayments under the Fed Facility. The voluntary
repayments of the Fed Facility do not reduce the amount
available to be borrowed thereunder.
|
|
14.
|
Commitments,
Contingencies and Guarantees
|
In the normal course of business, various commitments and
contingent liabilities are entered into by AIG and certain of
its subsidiaries. In addition, AIG guarantees various
obligations of certain subsidiaries.
|
|
(a)
|
Litigation
and Investigations
|
Litigation Arising from Operations. AIG and
its subsidiaries, in common with the insurance and financial
services industries in general, are subject to litigation,
including claims for punitive damages, in the normal course of
their business. In AIGs insurance operations, litigation
arising from claims settlement activities is generally
considered in the establishment of AIGs liability for
unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense. However, the
potential for increasing jury awards and settlements makes it
difficult to assess the ultimate outcome of such litigation.
Various federal, state and foreign regulatory and governmental
agencies are reviewing certain public disclosures, transactions
and practices of AIG and its subsidiaries in connection with
AIGs liquidity problems industry-wide and other inquiries.
These reviews include inquiries by the SEC and
U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) with respect to AIGs
valuation of and disclosures relating to the AIGFP super senior
credit default swap portfolio and the U.K. Serious Fraud Office
with respect to the UK operations of AIGFP. AIG has cooperated,
and will continue to cooperate, in producing documents and other
information in response to subpoenas and other requests.
In connection with some of the SEC investigations, AIG
understands that some of its employees have received Wells
notices and it is possible that additional current and former
employees could receive similar notices in the future. Under SEC
procedures, a Wells notice is an indication that the SEC staff
has made a preliminary decision to recommend enforcement action
that provides recipients with an opportunity to respond to the
SEC staff before a formal recommendation is finalized.
Although AIG cannot currently quantify its ultimate liability
for the unresolved litigation and investigation matters referred
to below, it is possible that such liability could have a
material adverse effect on AIGs consolidated financial
condition, consolidated results of operations or consolidated
cash flow for an individual reporting period.
Litigation
Relating to AIGFPs Super Senior Credit Default Swap
Portfolio
Securities Actions Southern District of New
York. On May 21, 2008, a purported
securities fraud class action complaint was filed against AIG
and certain of its current and former officers and directors in
the United States District Court for the Southern District of
New York (the Southern District of New York). The complaint
alleges that defendants made statements during the period
May 11, 2007 through May 9, 2008 in press releases,
AIGs quarterly and year-end filings and during conference
calls with analysts which were materially false and misleading
and which artificially inflated the price of AIGs stock.
The alleged false and misleading statements relate to, among
other things, unrealized market valuation losses on AIGFPs
super senior credit default swap portfolio as a result of severe
credit market disruption. The complaint alleges claims under
Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Exchange Act. Three
additional purported securities class action complaints were
subsequently filed in the
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 281
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Southern District of New York, all containing similar
allegations. One of the additional complaints, filed on
June 19, 2008, alleges a purported class period of
November 10, 2006 through June 6, 2008.
On October 9, 2008, a purported securities class action
complaint was filed in the Southern District of New York on
behalf of purchasers of AIGs
7.70 percent Series A-5
Junior Subordinated Debentures issued in a registered public
offering on December 11, 2007 against AIG, certain of its
current and former officers and directors, and the underwriters
of the offering. The complaint alleges that defendants made
statements in AIGs registration statement, prospectus and
quarterly and year-end filings which were materially false and
misleading, in violation of Sections 11, 12(a) and 15 of
the Securities Act of 1933. The claims are based generally on
the same allegations as the securities fraud class actions
described above. One additional purported securities class
action complaint was filed in the Southern District of New York
on October 27, 2008, containing identical allegations.
On December 4, 2008, a purported securities class action
complaint was filed in the Southern District of New York on
behalf of purchasers of various AIG securities issued pursuant
to three shelf registration statements filed on June 12,
2003, June 22, 2007, and May 12, 2008, against AIG,
certain of its current and former officers and directors, and
the underwriters of the offerings. The complaint alleges that
defendants made statements in the shelf registration statements,
and in annual, quarterly and current filings which were
materially false and misleading in violation of
Sections 11, 12(a) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933.
The claims are based generally on the same allegations as the
securities fraud class actions described above.
On January 15, 2009, a purported securities class action
complaint was filed in the Southern District of New York on
behalf of purchasers of AIG Medium-Term Notes,
Series AIG-FP,
which the complaint alleges were offered on a continuous basis
from November 17, 2006 through April 10, 2008, against
AIG, certain of its current and former officers and directors,
and the underwriters of the offerings. The complaint alleges
that in connection with the offering materials, defendants
failed to disclose information relevant to the creditworthiness
of AIG and therefore the value of the notes, making them false
and misleading in violation of Sections 11, 12(a) and 15 of
the Securities Act of 1933.
The Court has not yet appointed a lead plaintiff in these
actions.
ERISA Actions Southern District of New
York. On June 25, 2008, the Company, certain
of its executive officers and directors, and unnamed members of
the Companys Retirement Board and Investment Committee
were named as defendants in two separate, though nearly
identical, actions filed in the Southern District of New York.
The actions purport to be brought as class actions on behalf of
all participants in or beneficiaries of certain pension plans
sponsored by AIG or its subsidiaries (the Plans) during the
period May 11, 2007 through the present and whose
participant accounts included investments in the Companys
common stock. Plaintiffs allege, among other things, that the
defendants breached their fiduciary responsibilities to Plan
participants and their beneficiaries under the Employee
Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (ERISA), by:
(i) failing to prudently and loyally manage the Plans and
the Plans assets; (ii) failing to provide complete
and accurate information to participants and beneficiaries about
the Company and the value of the Companys stock;
(iii) failing to monitor appointed Plan fiduciaries and to
provide them with complete and accurate information; and
(iv) breaching their duty to avoid conflicts of interest.
The alleged ERISA violations relate to, among other things, the
defendants purported failure to monitor
and/or
disclose unrealized market valuation losses on AIGFPs
super senior credit default swap portfolio as a result of severe
credit market disruption. Six additional purported ERISA class
action complaints were subsequently filed in the Southern
District of New York, each containing similar allegations. It is
anticipated that these actions will all be consolidated and that
the Court will then appoint a lead plaintiff in the consolidated
action.
Derivative Actions Southern District of New
York. On November 20, 2007, two purported
shareholder derivative actions were filed in the Southern
District of New York naming as defendants the then current
directors of AIG and certain senior officers of AIG and its
subsidiaries. Plaintiffs assert claims for breach of fiduciary
duty, waste of corporate assets and unjust enrichment, as well
as violations of Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and
Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder, and Section 20(a) of the Exchange
Act, among other things, in connection with AIGs public
disclosures regarding its exposure to what the lawsuits describe
as the subprime market crisis. The
282 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
actions were consolidated as In re American International Group,
Inc. 2007 Derivative Litigation (the Consolidated 2007
Derivative Litigation). On February 15, 2008, plaintiffs
filed a consolidated amended complaint alleging the same causes
of action. On April 15, 2008, motions to dismiss the action
were filed on behalf of all defendants. The motions to dismiss
are pending.
On August 6, 2008, a purported shareholder derivative
action was filed in the Southern District of New York asserting
claims on behalf of AIG based generally on the same allegations
as in the consolidated amended complaint in the Consolidated
2007 Derivative Litigation.
Derivative Action Supreme Court of New
York. On February 29, 2008, a purported
shareholder derivative complaint was filed in the Supreme Court
of Nassau County naming as defendants the then current directors
of AIG and certain former and present senior officers of AIG and
its subsidiaries. Plaintiff asserts claims for breach of
fiduciary duty, waste of corporate assets, and unjust enrichment
in connection with AIGs public disclosures regarding its
exposure to what the complaint describes as the subprime
mortgage market. On May 19, 2008, defendants filed a motion
to dismiss or to stay the proceedings in light of the pending
Consolidated 2007 Derivative Litigation. The motion is pending.
Derivative Action Delaware Court of
Chancery. On September 17, 2008, a purported
shareholder derivative complaint was filed in the Court of
Chancery of Delaware naming as defendants certain former and
present directors and senior officers of AIG and its
subsidiaries. Plaintiff asserts claims on behalf of nominal
defendant AIG for breach of fiduciary duty, waste of corporate
assets, and mismanagement in connection with AIGs public
disclosures regarding its exposure to the subprime lending
market. On December 19, 2008, a motion to stay or dismiss
the action was filed on behalf of defendants. The motion is
pending.
Derivative Action Delaware Court of
Chancery. On January 15, 2009, a purported
shareholder derivative complaint was filed in the Court of
Chancery of Delaware naming as defendants certain current
directors of AIG and Joseph Cassano, the former CEO of AIGFP,
and asserting claims on behalf of nominal defendant AIGFP. As
sole shareholder of AIGFP, AIG was also named as a nominal
defendant. Plaintiff asserts claims against Joseph Cassano for
breach of fiduciary duty and unjust enrichment. The complaint
alleges that Cassano was responsible for losses suffered by
AIGFP related to its exposure to subprime-backed credit default
swaps and collateralized debt obligations and that he concealed
these losses for his own benefit.
Action by the Starr Foundation Supreme Court of
New York. On May 7, 2008, the Starr
Foundation filed a complaint in New York State Supreme Court
against AIG, AIGs former Chief Executive Officer, Martin
Sullivan, and AIGs then Chief Financial Officer, Steven
Bensinger, asserting a claim for common law fraud. The complaint
alleges that the defendants made materially misleading
statements and omissions concerning alleged multi-billion dollar
losses in AIGs portfolio of credit default swaps. The
complaint asserts that if the Starr Foundation had known the
truth about the alleged losses, it would have sold its remaining
shares of AIG stock. The complaint alleges that the Starr
Foundation has suffered damages of at least $300 million.
On May 30, 2008, a motion to dismiss the complaint was
filed on behalf of defendants. After a hearing, the complaint
was dismissed. On December 23, 2008, plaintiff filed a
notice of appeal.
Canadian Securities Class Action Ontario
Superior Court of Justice. On November 13,
2008, an application was filed in the Ontario Superior Court of
Justice for leave to bring a purported securities fraud class
action against AIG, AIGFP, certain of AIGs current and
former officers and directors, and the former CEO of AIGFP. If
the Court grants the application, a class plaintiff will be
permitted to file a statement of claim against AIG. The proposed
statement of claim would assert a class period of
November 10, 2006 through September 16, 2008, and
would allege that during this period defendants made false and
misleading statements and omissions in quarterly and annual
reports and during oral presentations in violation of the
Ontario Securities Act.
Litigation
Relating to the Credit Agreement with the NY Fed
On November 4, 2008, a purported class action was filed in
the Delaware Court of Chancery naming as defendants AIG,
Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Edward M. Liddy, and
certain current and former AIG directors. Plaintiff alleges
violations of Delaware General Corporation Law
Section 242(b)(2) and breaches of
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 283
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
fiduciary duty in connection with the Series C Preferred
Stock to be issued pursuant to the Fed Credit Agreement to the
trust created for the sole benefit of the United States
Treasury. Plaintiff sought an order declaring that the
Series C Preferred Stock is not convertible into common
stock absent a class vote by the holders of the common stock to
amend the Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the
number of shares of authorized common stock and decrease the par
value of the common stock, an order declaring that AIGs
directors are breaching their fiduciary duties in not seeking
alternative or supplemental financing in advance of a
stockholder vote on such an amendment to the Restated
Certificate of Incorporation, and damages. During a conference
with the Court on November 7, 2008, AIGs counsel
stated that any amendment to the Restated Certificate of
Incorporation to increase the number of authorized common stock
or to decrease the par value of the common stock would be the
subject of a class vote by the holders of the common stock, and
plaintiffs counsel agreed that the plaintiffs
request for an order granting this relief is moot. On
January 12, 2009, plaintiff agreed to stipulate to dismiss
its claims against defendants and litigate only the matter of
attorneys fees, which have been stipulated not to exceed
$350,000. On February 5, 2009, the Court approved a
stipulation and order of dismissal entered into by the parties
in connection with the action.
2006
Regulatory Settlements and Related Matters
2006 Regulatory Settlements. In February 2006,
AIG reached a resolution of claims and matters under
investigation with the DOJ, the SEC, the Office of the New York
Attorney General (NYAG) and the New York State Department of
Insurance (DOI). AIG recorded an after-tax charge of
$1.15 billion relating to these settlements in the fourth
quarter of 2005. The settlements resolved investigations
conducted by the SEC, NYAG and DOI in connection with the
accounting, financial reporting and insurance brokerage
practices of AIG and its subsidiaries, as well as claims
relating to the underpayment of certain workers
compensation premium taxes and other assessments. These
settlements did not, however, resolve investigations by
regulators from other states into insurance brokerage practices
related to contingent commissions and other broker-related
conduct, such as alleged bid rigging. Nor did the settlements
resolve any obligations that AIG may have to state guarantee
funds in connection with any of these matters.
As a result of these settlements, AIG made payments or placed
amounts in escrow in 2006 totaling approximately
$1.64 billion, $225 million of which represented fines
and penalties. Amounts held in escrow totaling approximately
$338 million, including interest thereon, are included in
other assets at December 31, 2008. At that date, all of the
funds were escrowed for settlement of claims resulting from the
underpayment by AIG of its residual market assessments for
workers compensation.
In addition to the escrowed funds, $800 million was
deposited into a fund under the supervision of the SEC as part
of the settlements to be available to resolve claims asserted
against AIG by investors, including the securities class action
shareholder lawsuits described below.
Also, as part of the settlements, AIG agreed to retain, for a
period of three years, an independent consultant to conduct a
review that will include, among other things, the adequacy of
AIGs internal control over financial reporting, the
policies, procedures and effectiveness of AIGs regulatory,
compliance and legal functions and the remediation plan that AIG
has implemented as a result of its own internal review.
Other Regulatory Settlements. AIGs 2006
regulatory settlements with the SEC, DOJ, NYAG and DOI did not
resolve investigations by regulators from other states into
insurance brokerage practices. AIG entered into agreements
effective January 29, 2008 with the Attorneys General of
the States of Florida, Hawaii, Maryland, Michigan, Oregon, Texas
and West Virginia; the Commonwealths of Massachusetts and
Pennsylvania; and the District of Columbia; as well as the
Florida Department of Financial Services and the Florida Office
of Insurance Regulation, relating to their respective
industry-wide investigations into producer compensation and
insurance placement practices. The settlements call for total
payments of $12.5 million to be allocated among the ten
jurisdictions representing restitution to state agencies and
reimbursement of the costs of the investigation. During the term
of the settlement agreements, AIG will continue to maintain
certain producer compensation disclosure and ongoing compliance
initiatives. AIG will also continue to cooperate with the
industry-wide investigations. The agreement with the Texas
Attorney General also settles allegations of anticompetitive
conduct relating to AIGs
284 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
relationship with Allied World Assurance Company and includes an
additional settlement payment of $500,000 related thereto.
AIG entered into an agreement effective March 13, 2008 with
the Pennsylvania Insurance Department relating to the
Departments investigation into the affairs of AIG and
certain of its Pennsylvania-domiciled insurance company
subsidiaries. The settlement calls for total payments of
approximately $13.5 million, of which approximately
$4.4 million was paid under previous settlement agreements.
During the term of the settlement agreement, AIG will provide
annual reinsurance reports, as well as maintain certain producer
compensation disclosure and ongoing compliance initiatives.
NAIC Examination of Workers Compensation Premium
Reporting. During 2006, the Settlement Review
Working Group of the National Association of Insurance
Commissioners (NAIC), under the direction of the states of
Indiana, Minnesota and Rhode Island, began an investigation into
AIGs reporting of workers compensation premiums. In
late 2007, the Settlement Review Working Group recommended that
a multi-state targeted market conduct examination focusing on
workers compensation insurance be commenced under the
direction of the NAICs Market Analysis Working Group. AIG
was informed of the multi-state targeted market conduct
examination in January 2008. The lead states in the multi-state
examination are Delaware, Florida, Indiana, Massachusetts,
Minnesota, New York, Pennsylvania, and Rhode Island. All other
states (and the District of Columbia) have agreed to participate
in the multi-state examination. To date, the examination has
focused on legacy issues related to AIGs writing and
reporting of workers compensation insurance between 1985
and 1996. AIG has also been advised that the examination will
focus on current compliance with legal requirements applicable
to such business. AIG has been advised by the lead states that
to date no determinations have been made with respect to these
issues, and AIG cannot predict either the outcome of the
investigation or provide any assurance regarding regulatory
action that may result from the investigation.
Securities Action Southern District of New
York. Beginning in October 2004, a number of
putative securities fraud class action suits were filed in the
Southern District of New York against AIG and consolidated as In
re American International Group, Inc. Securities Litigation.
Subsequently, a separate, though similar, securities fraud
action was also brought against AIG by certain Florida pension
funds. The lead plaintiff in the class action is a group of
public retirement systems and pension funds benefiting Ohio
state employees, suing on behalf of themselves and all
purchasers of AIGs publicly traded securities between
October 28, 1999 and April 1, 2005. The named
defendants are AIG and a number of present and former AIG
officers and directors, as well as Starr, SICO, General
Reinsurance Corporation (General Re), and PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP (PwC), among others. The lead plaintiff alleges, among other
things, that AIG: (1) concealed that it engaged in
anti-competitive conduct through alleged payment of contingent
commissions to brokers and participation in illegal bid-rigging;
(2) concealed that it used income smoothing
products and other techniques to inflate its earnings;
(3) concealed that it marketed and sold income
smoothing insurance products to other companies; and
(4) misled investors about the scope of government
investigations. In addition, the lead plaintiff alleges that
AIGs former Chief Executive Officer, Maurice R. Greenberg,
manipulated AIGs stock price. The lead plaintiff asserts
claims for violations of Sections 11 and 15 of the
Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act
and
Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder, Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act,
and Section 20A of the Exchange Act. In April 2006, the
court denied the defendants motions to dismiss the second
amended class action complaint and the Florida complaint. In
December 2006, a third amended class action complaint was filed,
which does not differ substantially from the prior complaint.
Fact discovery is currently ongoing. On February 20, 2008,
the lead plaintiff filed a motion for class certification. The
motion remains pending.
ERISA Action Southern District of New
York. Between November 30, 2004 and
July 1, 2005, several ERISA actions were filed in the
Southern District of New York on behalf of purported class
participants and beneficiaries of three pension plans sponsored
by AIG or its subsidiaries. A consolidated complaint filed on
September 26, 2005 alleges a class period between
September 30, 2000 and May 31, 2005 and names as
defendants AIG, the members of AIGs Retirement Board and
the Administrative Boards of the plans at issue, and present or
former members of AIGs Board of Directors. The factual
allegations in the complaint are essentially identical to those
in the securities actions described above under Securities
Actions Southern District of New York. The
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 285
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
parties have reached an agreement to settle this matter for an
amount within AIGs insurance coverage limits. On
July 3, 2008, the Court granted preliminary approval of the
settlement, and at a hearing on October 7, 2008 the Court
issued an order finally approving the settlement, dismissing the
action with prejudice. The deadline for filing an appeal from
the approval order was November 7, 2008. No appeal was
filed and the settlement is now final.
Derivative Action Southern District of New
York. Between October 25, 2004 and
July 14, 2005, seven separate derivative actions were filed
in the Southern District of New York, five of which were
consolidated into a single action (the New York
2004/2005
Derivative Litigation under Securities Actions
Southern District of New York). The complaint in this action
contains nearly the same types of allegations made in the
securities fraud action described above. The named defendants
include current and former officers and directors of AIG, as
well as Marsh & McLennan Companies, Inc. (Marsh),
SICO, Starr, ACE Limited and subsidiaries, General Re, PwC, and
certain employees or officers of these entity defendants.
Plaintiffs assert claims for breach of fiduciary duty, gross
mismanagement, waste of corporate assets, unjust enrichment,
insider selling, auditor breach of contract, auditor
professional negligence and disgorgement from AIGs former
Chief Executive Officer, Maurice R. Greenberg, and former Chief
Financial Officer, Howard I. Smith, of incentive-based
compensation and AIG share proceeds under Section 304 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, among others. Plaintiffs seek, among
other things, compensatory damages, corporate governance
reforms, and a voiding of the election of certain AIG directors.
AIGs Board of Directors has appointed a special committee
of independent directors (Special Committee) to review the
matters asserted in the operative consolidated derivative
complaint. The court has entered an order staying this action
pending resolution of the Delaware
2004/2005
Derivative Litigation discussed below. The court also has
entered an order that termination of certain named defendants
from the Delaware action applies to this action without further
order of the court. On October 17, 2007, plaintiffs and
those AIG officer and director defendants against whom the
shareholder plaintiffs in the Delaware action are no longer
pursuing claims filed a stipulation providing for all claims in
this action against such defendants to be dismissed with
prejudice. Former directors and officers Maurice R. Greenberg
and Howard I. Smith have asked the court to refrain from so
ordering this stipulation.
Derivative Actions Delaware Chancery
Court. From October 2004 to April 2005, AIG
shareholders filed five derivative complaints in the Delaware
Chancery Court. All of these derivative lawsuits were
consolidated into a single action as In re American
International Group, Inc. Consolidated Derivative Litigation
(the Delaware
2004/2005
Derivative Litigation). The amended consolidated complaint named
43 defendants (not including nominal defendant AIG) who, as in
the New York
2004/2005
Derivative Litigation, were current and former officers and
directors of AIG, as well as other entities and certain of their
current and former employees and directors. The factual
allegations, legal claims and relief sought in this action are
similar to those alleged in the New York
2004/2005
Derivative Litigation, except that the claims are only under
state law. In early 2007, the court approved an agreement that
AIG be realigned as plaintiff, and, on June 13, 2007,
acting on the direction of the Special Committee, AIG filed an
amended complaint against former directors and officers Maurice
R. Greenberg and Howard I. Smith, alleging breach of fiduciary
duty and indemnification. Also on June 13, 2007, the
Special Committee filed a motion to terminate the litigation as
to certain defendants, while taking no action as to others.
Defendants Greenberg and Smith filed answers to AIGs
complaint and brought third-party complaints against certain
current and former AIG directors and officers, PwC and
Regulatory Insurance Services, Inc. On September 28, 2007,
AIG and the shareholder plaintiffs filed a combined amended
complaint in which AIG continued to assert claims against
defendants Greenberg and Smith and took no position as to the
claims asserted by the shareholder plaintiffs in the remainder
of the combined amended complaint. In that pleading, the
shareholder plaintiffs are no longer pursuing claims against
certain AIG officers and directors. On February 12, 2008,
the court granted AIGs motion to stay discovery pending
the resolution of claims against AIG in the New York
consolidated securities action. On April 11, 2008, the
shareholder plaintiffs filed the First Amended Combined
Complaint, which added claims against former AIG directors and
officers Maurice Greenberg, Edward Matthews, and Thomas Tizzio
for breach of fiduciary duty based on alleged bid-rigging in the
municipal derivatives market. On June 13, 2008, certain
defendants filed motions to dismiss the shareholder
plaintiffs portions of the complaint. On February 11,
2009, the court denied the motions to dismiss filed by Maurice
Greenberg, Edward Matthews, and Thomas Tizzio; granted the
motion to dismiss filed by PwC without prejudice; and granted
the motion to dismiss filed by certain
286 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
former employees of AIG without prejudice for lack of personal
jurisdiction. The shareholder plaintiffs have appealed the
dismissal of PwC. The motions to dismiss filed by the remaining
parties are pending.
AIG is also named as a defendant in a derivative action in the
Delaware Chancery Court brought by shareholders of Marsh. On
July 10, 2008, shareholder plaintiffs filed a second
consolidated amended complaint, which contains claims against
AIG for aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty and
contribution and indemnification in connection with alleged
bid-rigging and steering practices in the commercial insurance
market that are the subject of the Policyholder Antitrust and
Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO)
Actions described below. On November 10, 2008, AIG and
certain defendants filed motions to dismiss the shareholder
plaintiffs portions of the complaint. The motions to
dismiss are pending.
Derivative Action Supreme Court of New
York. On February 11, 2009, shareholder
plaintiffs in the Delaware
2004/2005
Derivative Litigation filed a derivative complaint in the
Supreme Court of New York against the individual defendants who
moved to dismiss the complaint in the Delaware
2004/2005
Derivative Litigation on personal jurisdiction grounds. The
defendants include current and former officers and employees of
AIG, Marsh, and Gen Re; AIG is named as a nominal defendant. The
complaint in this action contains similar allegations to those
made in the Delaware
2004/2005
Derivative Litigation described above.
Policyholder Antitrust and RICO
Actions. Commencing in 2004, policyholders
brought multiple federal antitrust and RICO class actions in
jurisdictions across the nation against insurers and brokers,
including AIG and a number of its subsidiaries, alleging that
the insurers and brokers engaged in a broad conspiracy to
allocate customers, steer business, and rig bids. These actions,
including 24 complaints filed in different federal courts naming
AIG or an AIG subsidiary as a defendant, were consolidated by
the judicial panel on multi-district litigation and transferred
to the United States District Court for the District of New
Jersey (District of New Jersey) for coordinated pretrial
proceedings. The consolidated actions have proceeded in that
court in two parallel actions, In re Insurance Brokerage
Antitrust Litigation (the Commercial Complaint) and In re
Employee Benefit Insurance Brokerage Antitrust Litigation (the
Employee Benefits Complaint, and, together with the Commercial
Complaint, the Multi-district Litigation).
The plaintiffs in the Commercial Complaint are a group of
corporations, individuals and public entities that contracted
with the broker defendants for the provision of insurance
brokerage services for a variety of insurance needs. The broker
defendants are alleged to have placed insurance coverage on the
plaintiffs behalf with a number of insurance companies
named as defendants, including AIG subsidiaries. The Commercial
Complaint also named various brokers and other insurers as
defendants (three of which have since settled). The Commercial
Complaint alleges, among other things, that defendants engaged
in a widespread conspiracy to allocate customers through
bid-rigging and steering practices. Plaintiffs assert that the
defendants violated the Sherman Antitrust Act, RICO, and the
antitrust laws of 48 states and the District of Columbia,
and are liable under common law breach of fiduciary duty and
unjust enrichment theories. Plaintiffs seek treble damages plus
interest and attorneys fees as a result of the alleged
RICO and Sherman Antitrust Act violations.
The plaintiffs in the Employee Benefits Complaint are a group of
individual employees and corporate and municipal employers
alleging claims on behalf of two separate nationwide purported
classes: an employee class and an employer class that acquired
insurance products from the defendants from August 26, 1994
to the date of any class certification. The Employee Benefits
Complaint names AIG, as well as various other brokers and
insurers, as defendants. The activities alleged in the Employee
Benefits Complaint, with certain exceptions, track the
allegations made in the Commercial Complaint.
The Court in connection with the Commercial Complaint granted
(without leave to amend) defendants motions to dismiss the
federal antitrust and RICO claims on August 31, 2007 and
September 28, 2007, respectively. The court declined to
exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the state law claims in
the Commercial Complaint and therefore dismissed it in its
entirety. On January 14, 2008, the court granted
defendants motion for summary judgment on the ERISA claims
in the Employee Benefits Complaint and subsequently dismissed
the remaining state law claims without prejudice, thereby
dismissing the Employee Benefits Complaint in its entirety. On
February 12, 2008, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to
the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit with
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 287
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
respect to the dismissal of the Employee Benefits Complaint.
Plaintiffs previously appealed the dismissal of the Commercial
Complaint to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third
Circuit on October 10, 2007. Both appeals are fully briefed
and oral argument in both appeals has been tentatively scheduled
for April 20, 2009.
A number of complaints making allegations similar to those in
the Multi-district Litigation have been filed against AIG and
other defendants in state and federal courts around the country.
The defendants have thus far been successful in having the
federal actions transferred to the District of New Jersey and
consolidated into the Multi-district Litigation. These
additional consolidated actions are still pending in the
District of New Jersey, but are currently stayed pending a
decision by the court on whether they will proceed during the
appeal of the dismissal of the Multi-district Litigation. On
August 20, 2008, the District Court, however, granted
plaintiffs motion to lift the stay in one tag-along matter
and suggested that the case be remanded to the transferor court,
and on November 26, 2008, the Judicial Panel on
Multidistrict Litigation issued an order remanding the case to
the transferor court. The AIG defendants have also sought to
have state court actions making similar allegations stayed
pending resolution of the Multi-district Litigation proceeding.
These efforts have generally been successful, although
plaintiffs in one case pending in Texas state court have moved
to re-open discovery; a hearing on that motion was held on
April 9, 2008. The court subsequently issued an order
deferring a ruling on the motion until the Court holds a hearing
on defendants Special Exceptions. On January 9, 2009,
the Court held a hearing on defendants Special Exceptions.
The hearing has not been completed and has been continued to
April 3, 2009. AIG has settled several of the various
federal and state actions alleging claims similar to those in
the Multi-district Litigation, including a state court action
pending in Florida in which discovery had been allowed to
proceed.
Ohio Attorney General Action Ohio Court of Common
Pleas. On August 24, 2007, the Ohio Attorney
General filed a complaint in the Ohio Court of Common Pleas
against AIG and a number of its subsidiaries, as well as several
other broker and insurer defendants, asserting violation of
Ohios antitrust laws. The complaint, which is similar to
the Commercial Complaint, alleges that AIG and the other broker
and insurer defendants conspired to allocate customers, divide
markets, and restrain competition in commercial lines of
casualty insurance sold through the broker defendant. The
complaint seeks treble damages on behalf of Ohio public
purchasers of commercial casualty insurance, disgorgement on
behalf of both public and private purchasers of commercial
casualty insurance, as well as a $500 per day penalty for each
day of conspiratorial conduct. AIG, along with other
co-defendants, moved to dismiss the complaint on
November 16, 2007. On June 30, 2008, the Court denied
defendants motion to dismiss. On August 18, 2008,
defendants filed their answers to the complaint. Discovery is
ongoing.
Action Relating to Workers Compensation Premium
Reporting Northern District of
Illinois. On May 24, 2007, the National
Workers Compensation Reinsurance Pool (the NWCRP), on
behalf of its participant members, filed a lawsuit in the United
States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
against AIG with respect to the underpayment by AIG of its
residual market assessments for workers compensation. The
complaint alleges claims for violations of RICO, breach of
contract, fraud and related state law claims arising out of
AIGs alleged underpayment of these assessments between
1970 and the present and seeks damages purportedly in excess of
$1 billion. On August 6, 2007, the court denied
AIGs motion seeking to dismiss or stay the complaint or,
in the alternative, to transfer to the Southern District of New
York. On December 26, 2007, the court denied AIGs
motion to dismiss the complaint. On March 17, 2008, AIG
filed an amended answer, counterclaims and third-party claims
against the National Council on Compensation Insurance (in its
capacity as attorney-in-fact for the NWCRP), the NWCRP, its
board members, and certain of the other insurance companies that
are members of the NWCRP alleging violations of RICO, as well as
claims for conspiracy, fraud, and other state law claims. The
counterclaim-and third-party defendants filed motions to dismiss
on June 9, 2008. On February 23, 2009, the Court
issued a decision and order sustaining AIGs counterclaims
and sustaining, in part, AIGs third-party claims. The
Court also dismissed certain of AIGs third-party claims
without prejudice. The Court also has stayed the entire case
pending a ruling on AIGs motion to dismiss for lack of
subject matter jurisdiction, which is scheduled for a ruling on
June 10, 2009.
Action Relating to Workers Compensation Premium
Reporting Minnesota. On
February 16, 2006, the Attorney General of the State of
Minnesota filed a complaint against AIG with respect to claims
by the Minnesota Department of Revenue and the Minnesota Special
Compensation Fund, alleging that AIG made false statements
288 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
and reports to Minnesota agencies and regulators, unlawfully
reducing AIGs contributions and payments to Minnesota and
certain state funds relating to its workers compensation
premiums. While AIG settled that litigation in December 2007, a
similar lawsuit was filed by the Minnesota Workers
Compensation Reinsurance Association and the Minnesota
Workers Compensation Insurers Association in the United
States District Court for the District of Minnesota. On
March 28, 2008, the court granted AIGs motion to
dismiss the case in its entirety. On April 25, 2008,
plaintiffs appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for
the Eighth Circuit and also filed a new complaint making similar
allegations in Minnesota state court. On April 30, 2008,
substantially identical claims were also filed in Minnesota
state court by the Minnesota Insurance Guaranty Association and
Minnesota Assigned Risk Plan. On September 11, 2008, the
parties to both actions entered into a settlement, resulting in
the dismissal of all claims against AIG. In exchange for the
dismissal and a broad release of claims, the financial terms of
the settlement provided for AIGs payment of
$21.5 million to plaintiffs and waiver of its right to
collect $3.5 million in payments due from the plaintiffs.
Action Relating to Workers Compensation Premium
Reporting District of South
Carolina. A purported class action was also filed
in the United States District Court for the District of South
Carolina on January 25, 2008 against AIG and certain of its
subsidiaries, on behalf of a class of employers that obtained
workers compensation insurance from AIG companies and
allegedly paid inflated premiums as a result of AIGs
alleged underreporting of workers compensation premiums.
An amended complaint was filed on March 24, 2008, and AIG
filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on
April 21, 2008. On July 8, 2008, the court granted
AIGs motion to dismiss all claims without prejudice and
granted plaintiff leave to refile subject to certain conditions.
Plaintiffs filed their second amended complaint on July 22,
2008. AIG moved to dismiss the second amended complaint on
August 22, 2008. Discovery is stayed pending resolution of
the motion to dismiss.
Litigation
Relating to SICO and Starr
SICO Action. In July, 2005 SICO filed a
complaint against AIG in the Southern District of New York,
claiming that AIG had refused to provide SICO access to certain
artwork, and asking the court to order AIG immediately to
release the property to SICO. AIG filed an answer denying
SICOs allegations and setting forth defenses to
SICOs claims. In addition, AIG filed counterclaims
asserting breach of contract, unjust enrichment, conversion,
breach of fiduciary duty, a constructive trust and declaratory
judgment, relating to SICOs breach of its commitment to
use its AIG shares only for the benefit of AIG and AIG
employees. On June 23, 2008, the Court denied in part and
granted in part SICOs motion for summary judgment,
and on July 31, 2008 the parties submitted a joint
pre-trial order. Trial is scheduled to commence on June 15,
2009.
Derivative Action Relating to Starr and
SICO. On December 31, 2002, a derivative
lawsuit was filed in the Delaware Chancery Court against twenty
directors and executives of AIG as well as against AIG as a
nominal defendant that alleges, among other things, that the
directors of AIG breached the fiduciary duties of loyalty and
care by approving the payment of commissions to insurance
managing general agencies owned by Starr and of rental and
service fees to SICO and the executives breached their duty of
loyalty by causing AIG to enter into contracts with Starr and
SICO and their fiduciary duties by usurping AIGs corporate
opportunities. The complaint further alleges that the Starr
agencies did not provide any services that AIG was not capable
of providing itself, and that the diversion of commissions to
these entities was solely for the benefit of Starrs
owners. The complaint also alleges that the service fees and
rental payments made to SICO and its subsidiaries were improper.
Under the terms of a stipulation approved by the Court on
February 16, 2006, the claims against the outside
independent directors were dismissed with prejudice, while the
claims against the other directors were dismissed without
prejudice. In an opinion dated June 21, 2006, the Court
denied defendants motion to dismiss, except with respect
to plaintiffs challenge to payments made to Starr before
January 1, 2000. On July 21, 2006, plaintiff filed its
second amended complaint, which alleges that, between
January 1, 2000 and May 31, 2005, individual
defendants breached their duty of loyalty by causing AIG to
enter into contracts with Starr and SICO and breached their
fiduciary duties by usurping AIGs corporate opportunity.
Starr is charged with aiding and abetting breaches of fiduciary
duty and unjust enrichment for its acceptance of the fees. SICO
is no longer named as a defendant. On June 27, 2007, Starr
filed a cross-claim against AIG, alleging one count that
includes contribution, unjust enrichment and setoff. On
November 15, 2007, the Court granted AIGs motion to
dismiss the cross-claim by Starr to the extent that it sought
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 289
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
affirmative relief from AIG. On February 14, 2008, the
Court granted a motion to add former AIG officer Thomas Tizzio
as a defendant. As a result, the remaining defendants in the
case are AIG (the nominal defendant), Starr and former directors
and officers Maurice Greenberg, Howard Smith, Edward Matthews
and Thomas Tizzio. On September 30, 2008, the parties filed
a stipulation of settlement, where defendants agreed to payment
of $115 million to AIG, net of attorneys fees and
costs, in exchange for receipt of a broad release of claims
relating to the allegations in the complaint. At the settlement
hearing on December 17, 2008, the Court approved the terms
of the settlement and entered final judgment.
Litigation
Matters Relating to AIGs General Insurance
Operations
Caremark. AIG and certain of its subsidiaries
have been named defendants in two putative class actions in
state court in Alabama that arise out of the 1999 settlement of
class and derivative litigation involving Caremark Rx, Inc.
(Caremark). The plaintiffs in the second-filed action have
intervened in the first-filed action, and the second-filed
action has been dismissed. An excess policy issued by a
subsidiary of AIG with respect to the 1999 litigation was
expressly stated to be without limit of liability. In the
current actions, plaintiffs allege that the judge approving the
1999 settlement was misled as to the extent of available
insurance coverage and would not have approved the settlement
had he known of the existence
and/or
unlimited nature of the excess policy. They further allege that
AIG, its subsidiaries, and Caremark are liable for fraud and
suppression for misrepresenting
and/or
concealing the nature and extent of coverage. In addition, the
intervenor-plaintiffs originally alleged that various lawyers
and law firms who represented parties in the underlying class
and derivative litigation (the Lawyer Defendants) were also
liable for fraud and suppression, misrepresentation, and breach
of fiduciary duty. The complaints filed by the plaintiffs and
the intervenor-plaintiffs request compensatory damages for the
1999 class in the amount of $3.2 billion, plus punitive
damages. AIG and its subsidiaries deny the allegations of fraud
and suppression and have asserted that information concerning
the excess policy was publicly disclosed months prior to the
approval of the settlement. AIG and its subsidiaries further
assert that the current claims are barred by the statute of
limitations and that plaintiffs assertions that the
statute was tolled cannot stand against the public disclosure of
the excess coverage. The plaintiffs and intervenor-plaintiffs,
in turn, have asserted that the disclosure was insufficient to
inform them of the nature of the coverage and did not start the
running of the statute of limitations. On November 26,
2007, the trial court issued an order that dismissed the
intervenors complaint against the Lawyer Defendants and
entered a final judgment in favor of the Lawyer Defendants. The
matter was stayed pending appeal to the Alabama Supreme Court.
In September 2008 the Alabama Supreme Court affirmed the trial
courts dismissal of the Lawyer Defendants. After the case
was remanded to the trial court, the intervenor-plaintiffs
retained additional counsel the law firm of Haskell
Slaughter Young & Rediker, LLC (Haskell
Slaughter) and filed an Amended Complaint in
Intervention on December 1, 2008. The Amended Complaint in
Intervention names only Caremark and AIG and various
subsidiaries as defendants and purports to bring claims against
all defendants for deceit and conspiracy to deceive and against
AIG and its subsidiaries for aiding and abetting Caremarks
alleged deception. The defendants have moved to dismiss the
Amended Complaint, and, in the alternative, for a more definite
statement. After the appearance of the Haskell Slaughter firm on
behalf of the intervenor-plaintiffs, the plaintiffs moved to
disqualify all of the lawyers for the intervenor-plaintiffs
because, among other things, the Haskell Slaughter firm
previously represented Caremark. The intervenor-plaintiffs, in
turn, moved to disqualify the lawyers for the plaintiffs in the
first-filed action. The trial court heard oral argument on the
motions to disqualify on February 6, 2009, and the court
has also clarified that the defendants motion to dismiss
and any class action scheduling conference will be deferred
until the motions to disqualify have been decided. At this time,
class discovery has yet to begin. AIG cannot reasonably estimate
either the likelihood of its prevailing in these actions or the
potential damages in the event liability is determined.
Flight
Equipment
At December 31, 2008, ILFC had committed to purchase 168
new aircraft deliverable from 2009 through 2019 at an estimated
aggregate purchase price of $16.7 billion. ILFC will be
required to find customers for any aircraft acquired, and it
must arrange financing for portions of the purchase price of
such equipment.
290 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Included in the 168 new aircraft are 74 Boeing 787 aircraft,
with the first aircraft currently scheduled to be delivered in
July of 2012. Boeing has made several announcements concerning
delays in the deliveries of the 787s and ILFC is in discussion
with Boeing related to potential delay compensation and
penalties for which ILFC may be eligible. Under the terms of
ILFCs 787 leases, particular lessees may be entitled to
share in any compensation which ILFC receives from Boeing for
late delivery of the aircraft. ILFC has signed leases for 31 of
the 74 787s on order.
Minimum future rental income on noncancelable operating
leases of flight equipment that has been delivered was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
4,449
|
|
2010
|
|
|
4,026
|
|
2011
|
|
|
3,363
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,681
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2,027
|
|
Remaining years after 2013
|
|
|
4,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
20,593
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Flight equipment is leased under operating leases with remaining
terms ranging from 1 to 11 years.
Lease
Commitments
AIG and its subsidiaries occupy leased space in many locations
under various long-term leases and have entered into various
leases covering the long-term use of data processing equipment.
The future minimum lease payments under operating leases were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
2010
|
|
|
631
|
|
2011
|
|
|
463
|
|
2012
|
|
|
388
|
|
2013
|
|
|
311
|
|
Remaining years after 2013
|
|
|
1,665
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
4,258
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rent expense approximated $896 million, $771 million,
and $657 million for the years ended December 31,
2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively.
Other
Commitments
In the normal course of business, AIG enters into commitments to
invest in limited partnerships, private equities, hedge funds
and mutual funds and to purchase and develop real estate in the
U.S. and abroad. These commitments totaled
$9.2 billion at December 31, 2008.
On June 27, 2005, AIG entered into an agreement pursuant to
which AIG agreed, subject to certain conditions, to make any
payment that is not promptly paid with respect to the benefits
accrued by certain employees of AIG and its subsidiaries under
the SICO Plans in (c) below under Benefits Provided by
Starr International Company, Inc. and C.V. Starr &
Co., Inc.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 291
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Liability
for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense
Although AIG regularly reviews the adequacy of the established
liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense, there
can be no assurance that AIGs ultimate liability for
unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense will not develop
adversely and materially exceed AIGs current liability for
unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense. Estimation of
ultimate net claims, claims adjustment expenses and liability
for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense is a complex
process for long-tail casualty lines of business, which include
excess and umbrella liability, directors and officers liability
(D&O), professional liability, medical malpractice,
workers compensation, general liability, products
liability and related classes, as well as for asbestos and
environmental exposures. Generally, actual historical loss
development factors are used to project future loss development.
However, there can be no assurance that future loss development
patterns will be the same as in the past. Moreover, any
deviation in loss cost trends or in loss development factors
might not be discernible for an extended period of time
subsequent to the recording of the initial loss reserve
estimates for any accident year. Thus, there is the potential
for reserves with respect to a number of years to be
significantly affected by changes in loss cost trends or loss
development factors that were relied upon in setting the
reserves. These changes in loss cost trends or loss development
factors could be attributable to changes in inflation, in labor
and material costs or in the judicial environment, or in other
social or economic phenomena affecting claims.
Deferred
Tax Assets
AIGs determination of the realizability of deferred tax
assets requires estimates of future taxable income. Such
estimates could change in the near term, perhaps materially,
which may require AIG to adjust its valuation allowance. Such
adjustment, either positive or negative, could be material to
AIGs consolidated financial condition or its results of
operations. See Note 20 herein.
Benefits
Provided by Starr International Company, Inc. and C.V.
Starr & Co., Inc.
SICO has provided a series of two-year Deferred Compensation
Profit Participation Plans (SICO Plans) to certain AIG
employees. The SICO Plans were created in 1975 when the voting
shareholders and Board of Directors of SICO, a private holding
company whose principal asset is AIG common stock, decided that
a portion of the capital value of SICO should be used to provide
an incentive plan for the current and succeeding managements of
all American International companies, including AIG.
None of the costs of the various benefits provided under the
SICO Plans has been paid by AIG, although AIG has recorded a
charge to reported earnings for the deferred compensation
amounts paid to AIG employees by SICO, with an offsetting amount
credited to additional paid-in capital reflecting amounts
considered to be contributed by SICO. The SICO Plans provide
that shares currently owned by SICO are set aside by SICO for
the benefit of the participant and distributed upon retirement.
The SICO Board of Directors currently may permit an early payout
of units under certain circumstances. Prior to payout, the
participant is not entitled to vote, dispose of or receive
dividends with respect to such shares, and shares are subject to
forfeiture under certain conditions, including but not limited
to the participants voluntary termination of employment
with AIG prior to normal retirement age. Under the SICO Plans,
SICOs Board of Directors may elect to pay a participant
cash in lieu of shares of AIG common stock. Following
notification from SICO to participants in the SICO Plans that it
will settle specific future awards under the SICO Plans with
shares rather than cash, AIG modified its accounting for the
SICO Plans from variable to fixed measurement accounting. AIG
gave effect to this change in settlement method beginning on
December 9, 2005, the date of SICOs notice to
participants in the SICO Plans.
AIG has issued unconditional guarantees with respect to the
prompt payment, when due, of all present and future payment
obligations and liabilities of AIGFP arising from transactions
entered into by AIGFP.
292 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
SAI Deferred Compensation Holdings, Inc., a wholly owned
subsidiary of AIG, has established a deferred compensation plan
for registered representatives of certain AIG subsidiaries,
pursuant to which participants have the opportunity to invest
deferred commissions and fees on a notional basis. The value of
the deferred compensation fluctuates with the value of the
deferred investment alternatives chosen. AIG has provided a full
and unconditional guarantee of the obligations of SAI Deferred
Compensation Holdings, Inc. to pay the deferred compensation
under the plan. In December 2008, AIG terminated the plan for
current employees and ceased to permit new deferrals into the
plan.
|
|
15.
|
Shareholders
Equity and Earnings (Loss) Per Share
|
AIG parent depends on its subsidiaries for cash flow in the form
of loans, advances, reimbursement for shared expenses, and
dividends. AIGs insurance subsidiaries are subject to
regulatory restrictions on the amount of dividends that can be
remitted to AIG parent. These restrictions vary by jurisdiction.
For example, unless permitted by the New York Superintendent of
Insurance, general insurance companies domiciled in New York may
not pay dividends to shareholders that, in any twelve-month
period, exceed the lesser of ten percent of such companys
statutory policyholders surplus or 100 percent of its
adjusted net investment income, as defined.
Generally, less severe restrictions applicable to both general
and life insurance companies exist in most of the other states
in which AIGs insurance subsidiaries are domiciled.
Certain foreign jurisdictions have restrictions that could delay
or limit the remittance of dividends. There are also various
local restrictions limiting cash loans and advances to AIG by
its subsidiaries. Largely as a result of these restrictions, a
significant majority of the aggregate equity of AIGs
consolidated subsidiaries was restricted from immediate transfer
to AIG parent at December 31, 2008.
Series C
Perpetual, Convertible, Participating Preferred Stock
As partial consideration for the Fed Credit Agreement, AIG
agreed to issue 100,000 shares of Series C Preferred
Stock to the Trust. AIG recorded the $23 billion fair value
of the Series C Preferred Stock not yet issued as a prepaid
commitment fee asset and an increase to additional paid-in
capital. The Trust Agreement governing the operations of the
Trust was executed in January 2009. On March 1, 2009, AIG
entered into the Series C Preferred Stock Purchase
Agreement with the Trust, and AIG expects to issue the
Series C Preferred Stock to the Trust in early March 2009.
The Series C Preferred Stock will have voting rights
commensurate with an approximately 77.9 percent holding of
all outstanding shares of common stock, treating the
Series C Preferred Stock as converted. Holders of the
Series C Preferred Stock will be entitled to participate in
dividends paid on the common stock, receiving approximately
77.9 percent of the aggregate amount of dividends paid on
the shares of common stock then outstanding, treating the
Series C Preferred Stock as converted. After the
Series C Preferred Stock is issued and following notice
from the Trust, AIG will be required to hold a special
shareholders meeting to amend its Restated Certificate of
Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of
common stock to 19 billion and to reduce the par value per
share. The holders of the common stock will be entitled to vote
as a class separate from the holders of the Series C
Preferred Stock on these changes to AIGs Restated
Certificate of Incorporation. If the increase in the number of
authorized shares and change in par value of the common stock is
approved, the Series C Preferred Stock will become
convertible into common stock. The number of shares into which
the Series C Preferred Stock will be convertible is that
which will result in an approximately 77.9 percent holding,
after conversion, based upon the number of shares of common
stock outstanding on the issue date of the Series C
Preferred Stock, plus the number of shares of common stock that
are subsequently issued in settlement of Equity Units. Subject
to certain exceptions, while the Trust owns for the sole benefit
of the United States Treasury at least 50 percent of the
Series C Preferred Stock (or the shares into which the
Series C Preferred Stock is convertible), AIG will be
prohibited from issuing any capital stock, or any securities or
instruments convertible or exchangeable into, or exercisable
for, capital stock, without the Trusts consent. In
addition, AIG has provided demand registration rights for the
Series C Preferred Stock.
The $23 billion initial fair value of the Series C
Preferred Stock was determined by AIG primarily based on the
implied value of the common stock into which the Series C
Preferred Stock will be convertible as indicated by
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 293
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
AIGs common stock price immediately after the terms of the
Fed Credit Agreement were publicly announced. Other valuation
techniques were employed to corroborate this value, which
considered both market observable inputs, such as AIG credit
spreads, and other inputs. The following significant assumptions
were utilized in the valuation:
|
|
|
|
|
The valuation date for the Series C Preferred Stock was
September 16, 2008, the date AIG received the NY Feds
commitment to enter into the Fed Credit Agreement;
|
|
|
|
The Series C Preferred Stock will be economically
equivalent to the common stock, will have voting rights
commensurate with the common stock, and will be convertible into
shares of common stock; and
|
|
|
|
The price of AIGs common stock the day after the
announcement of the NY Feds commitment to enter into the
Fed Credit Agreement provided the most observable market
evidence of the value of the Series C Preferred Stock.
|
Basic and diluted EPS will be affected by the Series C
Preferred Stock in any period in which AIG has net income. The
effect on basic and diluted EPS will be computed using the
two-class method, pursuant to which the earnings of the period
will be allocated to the Series C Preferred Stock and the
common stock, as if all the earnings of the period were
distributed. Prior to any partial conversion of the
Series C Preferred Stock, this will result in approximately
77.9 percent of the earnings for the period being allocated
to the Series C Preferred Stock, directly reducing the net
income available for common shareholders. In the event that the
Series C Preferred Stock becomes convertible, Diluted EPS
will be determined using the more dilutive of the if-converted
method or the two-class method. Under the if-converted method,
conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock is assumed to
have occurred as of the beginning of the period, and the number
of common shares that would be issued on conversion is assumed
to be the number of additional shares outstanding for the
period. Because AIG incurred a net loss during the year ended
December 31, 2008, the Series C Preferred Stock was
anti-dilutive and is not reflected in the computation of basic
or diluted EPS.
Series D
Preferred Stock
Under the United States Department of the Treasurys
Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) and the Systemically
Significant Failing Institutions Program, AIG issued four
million shares of Series D Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual
Preferred Stock (Series D Preferred Stock) and a ten-year
warrant to purchase 53,798,766 shares of common stock (the
Warrant) for $40 billion, which AIG used to repay a portion
of the outstanding debt under the Fed Facility.
The Series D Preferred Stock ranks pari passu with
the Series C Preferred Stock and senior to AIGs
common stock. The Series D Preferred Stock has limited
class voting rights and cumulative compounding dividends at
10 percent per annum. The dividends are payable when, as
and if declared by AIGs Board of Directors. AIG is not
able to declare or pay any dividends on AIGs common stock
or on any AIG preferred stock ranking pari passu with or
junior to the Series D Preferred Stock until dividends on
the Series D Preferred Stock have been paid. AIG may redeem
the Series D Preferred Stock at the $40 billion stated
liquidation preference, plus accumulated but unpaid dividends,
at any time the Trust or a successor entity beneficially owns
less than 30 percent of AIGs voting securities and no
holder of the Series D Preferred Stock controls or has the
potential to control AIG. As of December 31, 2008, the
accumulated dividends were $400 million.
In addition, for as long as the United States Department of the
Treasury owns any of the Series D Preferred Stock, AIG is
subject to restrictions on its ability to repurchase capital
stock, and is required to adopt and maintain policies limiting
corporate expenses, lobbying activities and executive
compensation.
In connection with the issuance of the Series D Preferred
Stock, AIG issued the Warrant, which is exercisable at any time
and has an initial exercise price of $2.50 per share. The
exercise price will be reduced to $0.000001 per share in the
event AIGs shareholders approve a reduction in the par
amount of AIGs common stock to $0.000001 per share. The
United States Department of the Treasury has agreed that it will
not exercise any voting rights with respect to the common stock
issued upon exercise of the Warrant. The Warrant is not subject
to contractual transfer
294 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
restrictions other than restrictions necessary to comply with
U.S. federal and state securities laws. AIG is obligated,
at the request of the United States Department of the Treasury,
to file a registration statement with respect to the Warrant and
the common stock for which the Warrant can be exercised. During
the ten-year
term of the Warrant, if the shares of common stock of AIG are no
longer listed or trading on a national securities exchange, AIG
may be obligated, at the direction of the United States
Department of the Treasury, to exchange all or a portion of the
Warrant for another economic interest of AIG classified as
permanent equity under U.S. GAAP with an equivalent fair
value. If the Series D Preferred Stock issued in connection
with the Warrant is redeemed in whole or transferred to third
parties, AIG may repurchase the Warrant then held by the United
States Department of the Treasury at any time for its fair
market value so long as the Trust does not control or have the
potential to control AIG through Board of Director
representation.
Dividends
Dividends declared per common share were $0.42, $0.77, and $0.65
in 2008, 2007, and 2006, respectively. Effective
September 23, 2008, AIGs Board of Directors suspended
the declaration of dividends on AIGs common stock.
Pursuant to the Fed Credit Agreement, AIG is restricted from
paying dividends on its common stock. In addition, pursuant to
the terms of the Series D Preferred Stock, AIG is not able to
declare or pay any dividends on AIGs common stock or on
any AIG preferred stock ranking pari passu with or junior
to the Series D Preferred Stock until dividends on the
Series D Preferred Stock have been paid.
Share
Issuance and Repurchases
In February 2007, AIGs Board of Directors increased
AIGs share repurchase program by authorizing the purchase
of shares with an aggregate purchase price of $8 billion.
In November 2007, AIGs Board of Directors authorized the
purchase of an additional $8 billion in common stock. In
2007, AIG entered into structured share repurchase arrangements
providing for the purchase of shares over time with an aggregate
purchase price of $7 billion.
A total of 37,926,059 shares were purchased during the
first six months of 2008 to meet commitments that existed at
December 31, 2007. There were no repurchases during the
third and fourth quarters of 2008. At February 18, 2009,
$9 billion was available for purchases under the aggregate
authorizations.
Pursuant to the Fed Credit Agreement, however, AIG is restricted
from repurchasing shares of its common stock.
In May 2008, AIG sold 196,710,525 shares of common stock at
a price per share of $38 for gross proceeds of
$7.47 billion and 78,400,000 equity units (the Equity
Units) at a price per unit of $75 for gross proceeds of
$5.88 billion. The Equity Units, the key terms of which are
summarized below, are recorded as long-term debt in the
consolidated balance sheet.
Equity
Units
Each Equity Unit has an initial stated amount of $75 and
consists of a stock purchase contract issued by AIG and,
initially, a 1/40th or 2.5 percent undivided
beneficial ownership interest in three series of junior
subordinated debentures
(Series B-1,
B-2 and B-3), each with a principal amount of $1,000.
Each stock purchase contract requires its holder to purchase,
and requires AIG to sell, a variable number of shares of AIG
common stock for $25 in cash on each of February 15, 2011,
May 1, 2011 and August 1, 2011. The number of shares
that AIG is obligated to deliver on each stock purchase date is
set forth in the chart below (where the applicable market
value is an average of the trading prices of AIGs
common stock over the 20-trading-day period ending on the third
business day prior to the relevant stock purchase date).
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 295
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
If the applicable market value
is:
|
|
then AIG is obligated to
issue:
|
|
Greater than or equal to $45.60
|
|
0.54823 shares per stock purchase
contract
|
Between $45.60 and $38.00
|
|
Shares equal to $25 divided by the applicable
market value
|
Less than or equal to $38.00
|
|
0.6579 shares per stock purchase contract
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share (EPS) will not be affected by
outstanding stock purchase contracts. Diluted EPS will be
determined considering the potential dilution from outstanding
stock purchase contracts using the treasury stock method, and
therefore diluted EPS will not be affected by outstanding stock
purchase contracts until the applicable market value exceeds
$45.60.
AIG is obligated to pay quarterly contract adjustment payments
to the holders of the stock purchase contracts, at an initial
annual rate of 2.71 percent applied to the stated amount.
The present value of the contract adjustment payments,
$431 million, was recognized at inception as a liability (a
component of other liabilities), and was recorded as a reduction
to additional paid-in capital.
In addition to the stock purchase contracts, as part of the
Equity Units, AIG issued $1.96 billion of each of the
Series B-1,
B-2 and B-3 junior subordinated debentures, which initially pay
interest at rates of 5.67 percent, 5.82 percent and
5.89 percent, respectively. AIG allocated the proceeds of
the Equity Units between the stock purchase contracts and the
junior subordinated debentures on a relative fair value basis.
AIG determined that the fair value of the stock purchase
contract at issuance was zero, and therefore all of the proceeds
were allocated to the junior subordinated debentures.
Earnings
(Loss) Per Share (EPS)
Basic earnings (loss) per share and diluted loss per share are
based on the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding, adjusted to reflect all stock dividends and stock
splits. Diluted earnings per share is based on those shares used
in basic earnings (loss) per share plus shares that would have
been outstanding assuming issuance of common shares for all
dilutive potential common shares outstanding, adjusted to
reflect all stock dividends and stock splits.
The computation of basic and diluted EPS was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Numerator for EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principles
|
|
$
|
(99,289
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,200
|
|
|
$
|
14,014
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
Dividends on Series D Preferred Stock
|
|
|
(400
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock for basic EPS
|
|
|
(99,689
|
)
|
|
|
6,200
|
|
|
|
14,048
|
|
Interest on contingently convertible bonds, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to common stock for diluted EPS
|
|
|
(99,689
|
)
|
|
|
6,200
|
|
|
|
14,058
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principles applicable to common stock for diluted EPS
|
|
$
|
(99,689
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,200
|
|
|
$
|
14,024
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
296 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Denominator for EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding used in the computation of
EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued
|
|
|
2,872
|
|
|
|
2,751
|
|
|
|
2,751
|
|
Common stock in treasury
|
|
|
(252
|
)
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
Deferred shares
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding basic
|
|
|
2,634
|
|
|
|
2,585
|
|
|
|
2,608
|
|
Incremental shares from potential common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares arising from outstanding
employee stock plans (treasury stock method)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Contingently convertible bonds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted*
|
|
|
2,634
|
|
|
|
2,598
|
|
|
|
2,623
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principles
|
|
$
|
(37.84
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
5.38
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(37.84
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.40
|
|
|
$
|
5.39
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of change in accounting
principles
|
|
$
|
(37.84
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.39
|
|
|
$
|
5.35
|
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles, net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.01
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(37.84
|
)
|
|
$
|
2.39
|
|
|
$
|
5.36
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Calculated using the treasury stock method. Certain shares
arising from share-based employee compensation plans and the
warrant associated with the Series D Preferred Stock were
not included in the computation of diluted EPS because the
effect would have been anti-dilutive. The number of shares
excluded were 98 million, 8 million and
13 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively. |
|
|
16.
|
Statutory
Financial Data
|
Statutory surplus and net income (loss) for General Insurance
and Life Insurance & Retirement Services operations in
accordance with statutory accounting practices were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Statutory surplus(a):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Insurance
|
|
$
|
34,616
|
|
|
$
|
37,705
|
|
|
$
|
32,665
|
|
Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
|
24,511
|
|
|
|
33,212
|
|
|
|
35,058
|
|
Statutory net income(loss)(a)(b):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Insurance(c)
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
|
8,018
|
|
|
|
8,010
|
|
Life Insurance & Retirement Services(a)
|
|
|
(23,558
|
)
|
|
|
4,465
|
|
|
|
5,088
|
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 297
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Statutory surplus and net income (loss) with respect to
foreign operations are estimated at November 30. The basis
of presentation for branches of AIA is the Hong Kong statutory
filing basis. The basis of presentation for branches of ALICO is
the U.S. statutory filing basis. AIG Star Life, AIG Edison Life,
Nan Shan and Philamlife are estimated based on their respective
local country filing basis. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Includes realized capital gains and losses and taxes. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes catastrophe losses, net of tax, of
$1.15 billion and $177 million in 2008 and 2007. |
AIGs insurance subsidiaries file financial statements
prepared in accordance with statutory accounting practices
prescribed or permitted by domestic and foreign insurance
regulatory authorities. The principal differences between
statutory financial statements and financial statements prepared
in accordance with U.S. GAAP for domestic companies are
that statutory financial statements do not reflect DAC, some
bond portfolios may be carried at amortized cost, investment
impairments are determined in accordance with statutory
accounting practices, assets and liabilities are presented net
of reinsurance, policyholder liabilities are generally valued
using more conservative assumptions and certain assets are
non-admitted.
In connection with the filing of the 2005 statutory financial
statements for AIGs domestic General Insurance companies,
AIG agreed with the relevant state insurance regulators on the
statutory accounting treatment of various items. The regulatory
authorities have also permitted certain of the domestic and
foreign insurance subsidiaries to support the carrying value of
their investments in certain non-insurance and foreign insurance
subsidiaries by utilizing the AIG audited consolidated financial
statements to satisfy the requirement that the
U.S. GAAP-basis equity of such entities be audited. AIG has
received similar permitted practice authorizations from
insurance regulatory authorities in connection with the 2008 and
2007 statutory financial statements. The permitted practice
resulted in a benefit to the surplus of the domestic and foreign
General Insurance companies of $114 million and
$859 million, respectively, and did not affect compliance
with minimum regulatory capital requirements.
At December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006, statutory capital of
AIGs insurance subsidiaries exceeded minimum company
action level requirements.
Effective October 1, 2008, certain Domestic Life
Insurance and Domestic Retirement Services insurance
entities adopted a change in their statutory accounting
practices for other-than-temporary impairments from one
acceptable method to another for Bonds other than
loan-backed and structured securities and for
Loan-backed and structured securities. The effect of
the new practice was to reduce other-than-temporary impairments
for statutory reporting purposes in the fourth quarter of 2008,
thereby increasing statutory surplus for these entities by
approximately $7 billion as of December 31, 2008.
Effective January 1, 2009, these Domestic Life Insurance
and Domestic Retirement Services insurance entities, as well as
certain other AIG insurance entities are required to
prospectively adopt SSAP 98, Treatment of Cash Flows When
Quantifying Changes in Valuation and Impairments, an Amendment
of SSAP No. 43 Loan-backed and Structured
Securities (SSAP 98). The effect of applying SSAP 98 has
not yet been determined, but could decrease statutory surplus
for these entities by an amount that could be significant. Even
if this 2009 decrease is significant, AIG expects the statutory
surplus of such insurance subsidiaries to exceed minimum company
action level requirements.
|
|
17.
|
Share-based
Employee Compensation Plans
|
During the year ended December 31, 2008, AIG employees had
received compensation pursuant to awards under seven different
share-based employee compensation plans:
(i) AIG 1999 Stock Option Plan, as amended (1999 Plan);
(ii) AIG 1996 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended
(1996 Plan) the subscriptions were cancelled from
October 2007 based on the current market value of the common
stock of AIG;
(iii) AIG 2002 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (2002 Plan)
under which AIG has issued time-vested restricted stock units
(RSUs) and performance restricted stock units (performance RSUs);
298 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
(iv) AIG 2007 Stock Incentive Plan, as amended (2007 Plan);
(v) SICOs Deferred Compensation Profit Participation
Plans (SICO Plans);
(vi) AIGs
2005-2006
Deferred Compensation Profit Participation Plan (AIG
DCPPP) the AIG DCPPP was adopted as a replacement
for the SICO Plans for the
2005-2006
period. Share-based employee compensation earned under the AIG
DCPPP was granted as time-vested RSUs under the 2002
Plan; and
(vii) The AIG Partners Plan replaced the AIG DCPPP.
Share-based employee compensation awarded under the AIG Partners
Plan was granted as performance-based RSUs under the 2002 Plan,
except for the December 2007 grant which was made under the 2007
Plan.
Although awards granted under all the plans described above
remained outstanding at December 31, 2008, future grants of
options, RSUs and performance RSUs can be made only under the
2007 Plan. AIG currently settles share option exercises and
other share awards to participants by issuing shares it
previously acquired and holds in its treasury account, except
for share awards made by SICO, which are settled by SICO.
In 2006 and for prior years, AIGs non-employee directors
received share-based compensation in the form of options granted
pursuant to the 1999 Plan and grants of AIG common stock with
delivery deferred until retirement from the Board pursuant to
the AIG Director Stock Plan, which was approved by the
shareholders at the 2004 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and
which is now a subplan under the 2007 Plan. From and after
May 16, 2007, non-employee directors receive deferred stock
units (DSUs) under the 2007 Plan with delivery deferred until
retirement from the Board.
Effective January 1, 2006, AIG adopted the fair value
recognition provisions of FAS 123R for share-based
compensation awarded to employees and recorded the cumulative
effect of adoption of $46 million as a cumulative effect of
change in accounting principles, net of tax.
Included in AIGs consolidated statement of income for the
years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was pre-tax
share-based compensation expense of $389 million,
$275 million, and $353 million, respectively.
1999
Stock Option Plan
The 1999 Plan was approved by the shareholders at the 2000
Annual Meeting of Shareholders, with certain amendments approved
at the 2003 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The 1999 Plan
superseded the 1991 Employee Stock Option Plan (the 1991 Plan),
although outstanding options granted under the 1991 Plan
continue until exercise or expiration. Options granted under the
1999 Plan generally vest over four years (25 percent
vesting per year) and expire 10 years from the date of
grant. The 2007 Plan supersedes the 1999 Plan.
At December 31, 2008, 34,265,635 shares were reserved
for issuance under the 1999 and 1991 Plans and there are no
shares reserved for future grants under the 1999 Plan.
Deferrals
At December 31, 2008, AIG was obligated to issue
12,341,489 shares in connection with previous exercises of
options with delivery deferred.
Valuation
AIG uses a binomial lattice model to calculate the fair value of
stock option grants. A more detailed description of the
valuation methodology is provided below.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 299
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following weighted-average assumptions were used for
stock options granted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
|
Expected annual dividend yield(a)
|
|
|
3.77
|
%
|
|
|
1.39
|
%
|
|
|
0.92
|
%
|
Expected volatility(b)
|
|
|
53.27
|
%
|
|
|
32.82
|
%
|
|
|
23.50
|
%
|
Risk-free interest rate(c)
|
|
|
4.43
|
%
|
|
|
4.08
|
%
|
|
|
4.61
|
%
|
Expected term(d)
|
|
|
4 years
|
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
The dividend yield is determined at the grant date. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
In 2008, expected volatility is the average of historical
volatility (based on seven years of daily stock price changes)
and the implied volatility of actively traded options on AIG
shares. |
|
(c) |
|
The interest rate curves used in the valuation model were the
U.S. Treasury STRIP rates with terms from 3 months to
10 years. |
|
(d) |
|
In 2008, the expected term is 4 years based on the
average time to exercise derived from the output of the
valuation model. In 2007 and 2006, the contractual term of the
option was generally 10 years with an expected term of
7 years calculated based on an analysis of historical
employee and executive exercise behavior and employee turnover
(post-vesting terminations). The early exercise rate is a
function of time elapsed since the grant. Fifteen years of
historical data were used to estimate the early exercise
rate. |
Additional information with respect to AIGs stock
option plans is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
As of or for the Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Intrinsic Values
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at beginning of year
|
|
|
36,363,769
|
|
|
$
|
63.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,144,000
|
|
|
|
23.52
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(336,422
|
)
|
|
|
48.59
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Forfeited or expired
|
|
|
(2,905,712
|
)
|
|
|
58.60
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at end of year
|
|
|
34,265,635
|
|
|
$
|
63.08
|
|
|
|
4.18
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercisable at end of year
|
|
|
30,269,601
|
|
|
$
|
64.63
|
|
|
|
3.61
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average fair value per share of options granted
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10.61
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested and expected-to-vest options at December 31, 2008,
included in the table above, totaled 32,962,793, with a weighted
average exercise price of $64.46, a weighted average contractual
life of 3.91 years and a zero aggregate intrinsic value.
At December 31, 2008, total unrecognized compensation cost
(net of expected forfeitures) was $48 million with a
blended weighted average period of 1.09 years. The cost of
awards outstanding under these plans at December 31, 2008
is expected to be recognized over approximately three years.
The intrinsic value of options exercised during 2008, 2007 and
2006 was approximately $2 million, $360 million, and
$215 million, respectively. The grant date fair value of
options vesting during 2008, 2007 and 2006 was approximately
$67 million, $63 million and $97 million,
respectively. AIG received $16 million, $482 million
and $104 million in cash during 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively, from the exercise of stock options. The tax
benefits realized as a result of stock option exercises were
$0.5 million, $16 million and $35 million in
2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The weighted average grant
date fair values of options granted was $10.61, $20.97 and
$23.41 in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
300 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
AIGs 1996 Plan provides that eligible employees (those
employed at least one year) may receive privileges to purchase
up to an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of AIG common
stock, at a price equal to 85 percent of the fair market
value on the date of the grant of the purchase privilege.
Purchase privileges are granted quarterly and are limited to the
number of whole shares that can be purchased on an annual basis
by an amount equal to the lesser of 10 percent of an
employees annual salary or $10,000.
2002
Stock Incentive Plan
The 2002 Plan was adopted at the 2002 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders and amended and restated by AIGs Board of
Directors on September 18, 2002. During 2007, 179,106 RSUs,
including performance RSUs, were granted under the 2002 Plan.
Because the 2002 Plan has been superseded by the 2007 Plan,
there were no shares reserved for issuance in connection with
future awards at December 31, 2008 other than incremental
amounts awarded for attaining specified criteria under the AIG
DCPPP. Prior to March 2008, substantially all time-vested RSUs
granted under the 2002 Plan were scheduled to vest on the fourth
anniversary of the date of grant. Effective March 2008, the
vesting of the December 2005 and 2006 grants was accelerated to
vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant.
2007
Stock Incentive Plan
The 2007 Plan was adopted at the 2007 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders and amended and restated by AIGs Board of
Directors on November 14, 2007. The total number of shares
of common stock that may be issued under the Plan is
180,000,000. The 2007 Plan supersedes the 1999 Plan and the 2002
Plan. During 2008 and 2007, 1,533,998 and 7,121,252 RSUs,
respectively, including performance RSUs, were granted under the
2007 Plan. Each RSU, performance RSU and DSU awarded reduces the
number of shares available for future grants by 2.9 shares.
At December 31, 2008, there were 163,745,561 shares
reserved for issuance under the 2007 Plan. A significant
majority of the time-vested RSUs granted in 2008 under the 2007
Plan vest on the third anniversary of the date of grant.
Certain stock options granted in 2008 included a condition under
which AIGs stock price had to exceed specific price levels
for 15 consecutive trading days in order to vest.
Non-Employee
Director Stock Awards
The methodology used for valuing employee stock options is also
used to value director stock options. Director stock options
vest one year after the grant date, but are otherwise the same
as employee stock options. Commencing in 2007, directors no
longer receive awards of options. Options with respect to
40,000 shares were granted during 2006.
In 2008, AIG granted to directors 127,070 DSUs, including DSUs
representing dividend-equivalent amounts. AIG also granted to
directors 6,375 shares and 14,000 shares, with
delivery deferred, during 2007 and 2006, respectively, under the
Director Stock Plan. There were no deferred shares granted in
2008.
SICO
Plans
The SICO Plans provide that shares of AIG common stock currently
held by SICO are set aside for the benefit of the participant
and distributed upon retirement. The SICO Board of Directors
currently may permit an early payout of shares under certain
circumstances. Prior to payout, the participant is not entitled
to vote, dispose of or receive dividends with respect to such
shares, and shares are subject to forfeiture under certain
conditions, including but not limited to the participants
termination of employment with AIG prior to normal retirement
age.
The SICO Plans are also described in Note 14 herein.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 301
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Although none of the costs of the various benefits provided
under the SICO Plans have been paid by AIG, AIG has recorded
compensation expense for the deferred compensation amounts
payable to AIG employees by SICO, with an offsetting amount
credited to additional paid-in capital reflecting amounts deemed
contributed by SICO.
A significant portion of the awards under the SICO Plans vest
the year after the participant reaches age 65, provided
that the participant remains employed by AIG through
age 65. The portion of the awards for which early payout is
available vest on the applicable payout date.
AIG
DCPPP
The AIG DCPPP provides share-based compensation to key AIG
employees, including senior executive officers.
The AIG DCPPP contingently allocated a fixed number of
time-vested RSUs to each participant if AIGs cumulative
adjusted earnings per share in 2005 and 2006 exceeded that in
2003 and 2004 as determined by AIGs Compensation
Committee. This goal was met, and pursuant to the terms of the
DCPPP, 3,696,836 time-vested RSUs were awarded in 2007. Due to
the modification in March 2008, the vesting periods for these
RSUs have been shortened to vest in three installments with the
final installment vesting in January 2012.
At December 31, 2008, RSU awards with respect to
2,987,955 shares remained outstanding.
AIG
Partners Plan
On June 26, 2006, AIGs Compensation Committee
approved two grants under the AIG Partners Plan. The first grant
had a performance period that ran from January 1, 2006
through December 31, 2007. The second grant has a
performance period that runs from January 1, 2007 through
December 31, 2008. In December 2007, the Compensation
Committee approved a grant with a performance period from
January 1, 2008 through December 31, 2009. The
Compensation Committee approved the performance metrics for this
grant in the first quarter of 2008. The first and the second
grants vest 50 percent on the fourth and sixth
anniversaries of the first day of the related performance
period. The third grant vests 50 percent on the third and
fourth anniversaries of the first day of the performance period.
The Compensation Committee approved the performance metrics for
the first two grants prior to the date of grant. The measurement
of the first two grants is deemed to have occurred on
June 26, 2006 when there was mutual understanding of the
key terms and conditions of the first two grants. All grants
were modified in March 2008. In 2008, no compensation cost was
recognized for the second and the third grants under the
Partners Plan because the performance threshold for these awards
was not met. In 2007, no compensation cost was recognized, and
the compensation cost recognized in 2006 was reversed for the
first grant under the Partners Plan because the performance
threshold for these awards was not met.
Valuation
The fair value of RSUs and performance RSUs is based on the
closing price of AIG stock on the date of grant.
302 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The following table presents a summary of shares relating to
outstanding awards unvested under the foregoing plans*:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Shares
|
|
|
Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Time-vested
|
|
|
AIG
|
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
Total AIG
|
|
|
Total SICO
|
|
|
Time-vested
|
|
|
AIG
|
|
|
Partners
|
|
|
AIG
|
|
|
SICO
|
|
As of or for the Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
RSUs
|
|
|
DCPPP
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
RSUs
|
|
|
DCPPP
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Unvested, beginning of year
|
|
|
11,343,688
|
|
|
|
4,220,460
|
|
|
|
4,941,525
|
|
|
|
20,505,673
|
|
|
|
9,469,809
|
|
|
$
|
63.01
|
|
|
$
|
54.53
|
|
|
$
|
55.08
|
|
|
$
|
59.36
|
|
|
$
|
61.27
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
1,533,998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,378,342
|
|
|
|
2,912,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25.40
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.59
|
|
|
|
33.06
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested
|
|
|
(780,598
|
)
|
|
|
(620,945
|
)
|
|
|
(183,744
|
)
|
|
|
(1,585,287
|
)
|
|
|
(1,213,505
|
)
|
|
|
64.49
|
|
|
|
51.34
|
|
|
|
39.13
|
|
|
|
56.40
|
|
|
|
45.50
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(2,171,366
|
)
|
|
|
(284,770
|
)
|
|
|
(2,772,889
|
)
|
|
|
(5,229,025
|
)
|
|
|
(677,107
|
)
|
|
|
43.70
|
|
|
|
57.48
|
|
|
|
55.83
|
|
|
|
50.88
|
|
|
|
60.19
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested, end of year
|
|
|
9,925,722
|
|
|
|
3,314,745
|
|
|
|
3,363,234
|
|
|
|
16,603,701
|
|
|
|
7,579,197
|
|
|
$
|
61.31
|
|
|
$
|
57.36
|
|
|
$
|
50.23
|
|
|
$
|
58.28
|
|
|
$
|
61.12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Options are reported under the Additional information with
respect to AIGs stock option plans table above. DSUs are
reported under Non-Employee Director Stock Awards. For the AIG
DCPPP, includes all incremental shares granted or to be
granted. |
The total unrecognized compensation cost (net of expected
forfeitures) related to non-vested share-based compensation
awards granted under the 2002 Plan, the 2007 Plan, the AIG
DCPPP, the AIG Partners Plan and the SICO Plans and the
weighted-average periods over which those costs are expected to
be recognized are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrecognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Compensation
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
Expected
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
Cost
|
|
Average Period
|
|
Period
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Time-vested RSUs 2002 Plan
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
|
0.64 years
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Time-vested RSUs 2007 Plan
|
|
$
|
151
|
|
|
|
1.13 years
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
AIG DCPPP
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
|
1.07 years
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
AIG Partners Plan
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
|
1.19 years
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Total AIG Plans
|
|
$
|
325
|
|
|
|
1.01 years
|
|
|
|
3 years
|
|
Total SICO Plans
|
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
|
5.63 years
|
|
|
|
31 years
|
|
Modifications
During the first quarter of 2008, AIG reviewed the vesting
schedules of its share-based employee compensation plans, and on
March 11, 2008, AIGs management and the Compensation
and Management Resources Committee of AIGs Board of
Directors determined that, to fulfill the objective of
attracting and retaining high quality personnel, the vesting
schedules of certain awards outstanding under these plans and
all awards made in the future under these plans should be
shortened. AIG also modified the metrics used to determine the
level of performance achieved with respect to the AIG Partners
Plan.
For accounting purposes, a modification of the terms or
conditions of an equity award is treated as an exchange of the
original award for a new award. As a result of this
modification, the incremental value related to the remaining
affected awards totaled $21 million and will, together with
the unamortized originally-measured compensation cost, be
amortized over shorter periods. The modifications increased the
net amortization of this cost by $98 million in 2008. AIG
estimates the modifications will increase the amortization of
this cost by $43 million in 2009, with a related reduction
in amortization expense of $120 million in 2010 through
2013.
Pension
Plans
AIG, its subsidiaries and certain affiliated companies offer
various defined benefit plans to eligible employees based on
either completion of a specified period of continuous service or
date of hire, subject to age limitations.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 303
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
AIGs U.S. qualified retirement plans are
noncontributory defined benefit plans which are subject to the
provisions of ERISA. U.S. salaried employees who are
employed by a participating company, have attained age 21
and completed twelve months of continuous service are eligible
to participate in the plans. Employees generally vest after
5 years of service. Unreduced benefits are paid to retirees
at normal retirement (age 65) and are based upon a
percentage of final average compensation multiplied by years of
credited service, up to 44 years.
Non-U.S. defined
benefit plans are generally either based on the employees
years of credited service and compensation in the years
preceding retirement or on points accumulated based on the
employees job grade and other factors during each year of
service.
In 2007, AIG acquired the outstanding minority interest of
21st Century. Assets, obligations and costs with respect to
21st Centurys plans are included herein. The
assumptions used by 21st Century in its plans were not
significantly different from those used by AIG in AIGs
U.S. plans.
AIG also sponsors several unfunded defined benefit plans for
certain employees, including key executives, designed to
supplement pension benefits provided by AIGs other
retirement plans. These include the AIG Excess Retirement Income
Plan, which provides a benefit equal to the reduction in
benefits payable to certain employees under the AIG
U.S. retirement plan as a result of federal tax limitations
on compensation and benefits payable and the Supplemental
Executive Retirement Plan, which provides additional retirement
benefits to designated executives. Under the Supplemental Plan,
an annual benefit accrues at a percentage of final average pay
multiplied by each year of credited service, not greater than
60 percent of final average pay, reduced by any benefits
from the current and any predecessor retirement plans (including
the AIG Excess Retirement Income Plan and any comparable plans),
Social Security, if any, and from any qualified pension plan of
prior employers.
Postretirement
Plans
AIG and its subsidiaries also provide postretirement medical
care and life insurance benefits in the U.S. and in certain
non-U.S. countries.
Eligibility in the various plans is generally based upon
completion of a specified period of eligible service and
attaining a specified age. Overseas, benefits vary by geographic
location.
U.S. postretirement medical and life insurance benefits are
based upon the employee electing immediate retirement and having
a minimum of ten years of service. Medical benefits are
contributory, while the life insurance benefits are
non-contributory. Retiree medical contributions vary with age
and length of service and range from requiring no cost for
pre-1989 retirees to requiring actual premium payments reduced
by certain credits for post-1993 retirees. These contributions
are subject to adjustment annually. Other cost sharing features
of the medical plan include deductibles, coinsurance, Medicare
coordination and a lifetime maximum benefit of $2 million.
The following table presents the funded status of the plans,
reconciled to the amount reported in the consolidated balance
sheet. The measurement date for some of the
non-U.S. defined
benefit pension and postretirement plans is November 30,
consistent with the fiscal year-end of the sponsoring companies.
For all other plans, measurement occurs as of December 31,
2008.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Postretirement(a)
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans(b)
|
|
|
U.S. Plans(c)
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans
|
|
|
U.S. Plans
|
|
As of or for the Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Change in projected benefit obligation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefit obligation, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
1,745
|
|
|
$
|
1,578
|
|
|
$
|
3,156
|
|
|
$
|
3,079
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
|
$
|
252
|
|
Service cost
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
|
135
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
Participant contributions
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actuarial (gain) loss
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
|
(159
|
)
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Plan amendments and mergers
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
304 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Postretirement(a)
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans(b)
|
|
|
U.S. Plans(c)
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans
|
|
|
U.S. Plans
|
|
As of or for the Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Benefits paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG assets
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Plan assets
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency fluctuation
|
|
|
107
|
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
67
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Projected benefit obligation, end of year
|
|
$
|
2,080
|
|
|
$
|
1,745
|
|
|
$
|
3,745
|
|
|
$
|
3,156
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
|
$
|
285
|
|
|
$
|
257
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in plan assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets, at beginning of year
|
|
$
|
952
|
|
|
$
|
850
|
|
|
$
|
3,129
|
|
|
$
|
2,760
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Actual return on plan assets, net of expenses
|
|
|
(205
|
)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(334
|
)
|
|
|
162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG contributions
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
309
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
Participant contributions
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Benefits paid:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG assets
|
|
|
(60
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Plan assets
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
|
(96
|
)
|
|
|
(91
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign currency fluctuation
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets, end of year
|
|
$
|
765
|
|
|
$
|
952
|
|
|
$
|
2,733
|
|
|
$
|
3,129
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded status, end of year
|
|
$
|
(1,315
|
)
|
|
$
|
(793
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,012
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(101
|
)
|
|
$
|
(79
|
)
|
|
$
|
(285
|
)
|
|
$
|
(257
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheet:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
(1,347
|
)
|
|
|
(821
|
)
|
|
|
(1,012
|
)
|
|
|
(255
|
)
|
|
|
(101
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(285
|
)
|
|
|
(257
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amounts recognized
|
|
$
|
(1,315
|
)
|
|
$
|
(793
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,012
|
)
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(101
|
)
|
|
$
|
(79
|
)
|
|
$
|
(285
|
)
|
|
$
|
(257
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive
(income) loss:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
601
|
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
1,429
|
|
|
$
|
513
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service cost (credit)
|
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amounts recognized
|
|
$
|
535
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
$
|
1,428
|
|
|
$
|
511
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
35
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
AIG does not currently fund postretirement benefits. |
|
(b) |
|
Includes unfunded plans for which the aggregate pension
benefit obligation was $859 million and $559 million
at December 2008 and 2007, respectively. For 2008 and 2007,
approximately 82 percent and 83 percent pertain to
Japanese plans, which are not required by local regulation to be
funded. The projected benefit obligation for these plans total
$702 million and $464 million, respectively. |
|
(c) |
|
Includes non-qualified unfunded plans, for which the
aggregate projected benefit obligation was $270 million and
$240 million at December 2008 and 2007, respectively. |
The accumulated benefit obligations for both
non-U.S. and
U.S. pension benefit plans were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Non-U.S.
pension benefit plans
|
|
$
|
1,862
|
|
|
$
|
1,504
|
|
U.S. pension benefit plans
|
|
$
|
3,219
|
|
|
$
|
2,752
|
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 305
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Defined benefit pension plan obligations in which the
projected benefit obligation was in excess of the related plan
assets and in which the accumulated benefit obligation was in
excess of the related plan assets were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
PBO Exceeds Fair Value of Plan Assets
|
|
ABO Exceeds Fair Value of Plan Assets
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans
|
|
U.S. Plans
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans
|
|
U.S. Plans
|
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
2008
|
|
2007
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Projected benefit obligation
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,676
|
|
|
$
|
3,745
|
|
|
$
|
368
|
|
|
$
|
1,840
|
|
|
$
|
1,415
|
|
|
$
|
3,745
|
|
|
$
|
240
|
|
Accumulated benefit obligation
|
|
|
1,800
|
|
|
|
1,462
|
|
|
|
3,219
|
|
|
|
317
|
|
|
|
1,676
|
|
|
|
1,277
|
|
|
|
3,219
|
|
|
|
206
|
|
Fair value of plan assets
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
855
|
|
|
|
2,733
|
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
|
519
|
|
|
|
652
|
|
|
|
2,733
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents the components of net periodic
benefit cost recognized in income and other amounts recognized
in Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss with respect to
the defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement
benefit plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans
|
|
|
U.S. Plans
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans
|
|
|
U.S. Plans
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
90
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
202
|
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
(44
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
|
(235
|
)
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service credit
|
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
Amortization of transitional obligation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of net loss
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net periodic benefit cost
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
159
|
|
|
$
|
176
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
other comprehensive (income) loss
|
|
$
|
361
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
$
|
917
|
|
|
$
|
(155
|
)
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other
comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
508
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
1,039
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The estimated net loss and prior service credit that will be
amortized from Accumulated other comprehensive income into net
periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year are
$136 million and $12 million, respectively, for
AIGs combined defined benefit pension plans. For the
defined benefit postretirement plans, the estimated amortization
from Accumulated other comprehensive income for net loss, prior
service credit and transition obligation that will be amortized
into net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year will be
less than $2 million in the aggregate.
The annual pension expense in 2009 for the AIG U.S. Retirement
Plan is expected to be approximately $239 million. A
100 basis point increase in the discount rate or expected
long-term rate of return would decrease the 2009 expense by
approximately $65 million and $27 million,
respectively, with all other items remaining the same.
Conversely, a 100 basis point decrease in the discount rate
or expected long-term rate of return would increase the 2009
expense by approximately $84 million and $27 million,
respectively, with all other items remaining the same.
306 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Assumptions
The weighted average assumptions used to determine the
benefit obligations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans
|
|
|
U.S. Plans
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans
|
|
|
U.S. Plans
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
2.00 - 15.00
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
1.50 - 7.25
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
2.50 - 10.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
3.00 - 4.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
2.00 - 11.00
|
%
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
|
|
2.75 - 6.50
|
%
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
1.50 - 9.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
3.00 - 3.50
|
%
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The benefit obligations for
non-U.S. plans
reflect those assumptions that were most appropriate for the
local economic environments of each of the subsidiaries
providing such benefits.
Assumed health care cost trend rates for the U.S. plans
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Following year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical (before age 65)
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
|
|
9.00
|
%
|
Medical (age 65 and older)
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
|
7.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate rate to which cost increase is assumed to decline
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.00
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year in which the ultimate trend rate is reached:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical (before age 65)
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Medical (age 65 and older)
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A one percent point change in the assumed healthcare cost
trend rate would have the following effect on AIGs
postretirement benefit obligations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
One Percent
|
|
|
One Percent
|
|
|
|
Increase
|
|
|
Decrease
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Non-U.S.
plans
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
U.S. plans
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIGs postretirement plans provide benefits primarily in
the form of defined employer contributions rather than defined
employer benefits. Changes in the assumed healthcare cost trend
rate are subject to caps for U.S. plans. AIGs
non-U.S. postretirement
plans are not subject to caps.
The weighted average assumptions used to determine the net
periodic benefit costs were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans*
|
|
|
U.S. Plans
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans*
|
|
|
U.S. Plans
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
2.00 - 11.00
|
%
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
|
|
2.75 - 6.50
|
%
|
|
|
6.50
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
1.50 - 9.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
3.00 - 3.50
|
%
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
2.75 - 9.75
|
%
|
|
|
7.75
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 307
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans*
|
|
|
U.S. Plans
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans*
|
|
|
U.S. Plans
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
2.25 - 10.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.00 - 5.75
|
%
|
|
|
6.00
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
1.50 - 10.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
3.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
2.50 - 10.50
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discount rate
|
|
|
1.75 - 12.00
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
4.50 - 5.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
Rate of compensation increase
|
|
|
1.50 - 10.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
|
|
2.50 - 3.00
|
%
|
|
|
4.25
|
%
|
Expected return on assets
|
|
|
2.50 - 13.50
|
%
|
|
|
8.00
|
%
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
* |
The benefit obligations for
non-U.S.
plans reflect those assumptions that were most appropriate for
the local economic environments of the subsidiaries providing
such benefits.
|
Discount
Rate Methodology
The projected benefit cash flows under the U.S. AIG
Retirement Plan were discounted using the spot rates derived
from the unadjusted Citigroup Pension Discount Curve at
December 31, 2008 and 2007 and an equivalent single
discount rate was derived that resulted in the same liability.
This single discount rate was rounded to the nearest
25 basis points, namely 6.0 percent and
6.5 percent at December 31, 2008 and 2007,
respectively. The rates applied to other U.S. plans were
not significantly different from those discussed above.
In general, the discount rate for
non-U.S. pension
plans are selected by reference to high quality corporate bonds
in developed markets, or local government bonds where developed
markets are not as robust or nonexistent. Both funded and
unfunded plans for Japan represent over 71 percent and
62 percent of the liabilities of AIGs
non-U.S. pension
plans at December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. The
discount rate of 2.0 percent for Japan was selected by
reference to the published Moodys/S&P AA Corporate
Bond Universe at the measurement date having regard to the
duration of the plans liabilities.
Plan
Assets
The investment strategy with respect to assets relating to
AIGs U.S. pension plans is designed to achieve
investment returns that will fully fund the pension plans over
the long term, while limiting the risk of under funding over
shorter time periods and defray plan expenses. Accordingly, the
asset allocation is targeted to maximize the investment rate of
return while managing various risk factors, including the risk
and rewards profile indigenous to each asset class. Plan assets
are periodically monitored by both the investment committee of
AIGs Retirement Board and the investment managers, which
can entail rebalancing the plans assets within
pre-approved ranges, as deemed appropriate. For example, as a
result of the disruption in the financial markets, AIG opted to
terminate the pension plans securities lending activities
in 2008, to mitigate losses.
The expected long-term rates of return for AIGs
U.S. pension plans were 7.75 and 8.00 percent for the
years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. These
rates of return are an aggregation of expected returns within
each asset category that, when combined with AIGs
contribution to the plan, are expected to maintain the
plans ability to meet all required benefit obligations.
The return with respect to each asset class was developed based
on a building block approach that considers both historical
returns, current market conditions, asset volatility and the
expectations for future market returns. While the assessment of
the expected rate of return is long-term and thus not expected
to change annually, significant changes in investment strategy
or economic conditions may warrant such a change.
Non-U.S. pension
plan assets are held in various trusts and are similarly
invested in equity, debt and other investments to maximize the
long-term return on assets for a given level of risk. Other
investments for both the U.S. and
Non-U.S. plans
includes cash, insurance contracts, real estate, private equity,
related party group annuity
308 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
and hedge funds asset classes. The related party group annuity
is with US Life, an AIG affiliate, and totaled approximately
$36 million and $38 million at December 31, 2008
and 2007, respectively. There were no shares of AIG common stock
included in the U.S. pension plan assets at
December 31, 2008 or 2007.
The asset allocation percentage by major asset class for
AIGs plans and the target allocation follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31,
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S. Plans-Allocation
|
|
|
U.S. Plans-Allocation
|
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Target
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
Actual
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
Asset class:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities
|
|
|
41
|
%
|
|
|
39
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
%
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
|
|
56
|
%
|
Debt securities
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Other
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected
Cash Flows
Funding for the U.S. pension plan ranges from the minimum
amount required by ERISA to the maximum amount that would be
deductible for U.S. tax purposes. This range is generally
not determined until the fourth quarter. Contributed amounts in
excess of the minimum amounts are deemed voluntary. Amounts in
excess of the maximum amount would be subject to an excise tax
and may not be deductible under the Internal Revenue Code.
Supplemental and excess plans payments and postretirement
plan payments are deductible when paid.
During 2008 AIG contributed $174 million to its
U.S. and
non-U.S. pension
plans. The annual pension contribution in 2009 is expected to be
approximately $600 million for U.S. and
non-U.S. plans.
These estimates are subject to change, since contribution
decisions are affected by various factors including AIGs
liquidity, asset dispositions, market performance and
managements discretion.
As of January 1, 2009, AIG anticipates that the U.S.
pension plans funded status based on the Pension
Protection Act of 2006 target liability will exceed
94 percent. As a result, AIG does not anticipate any
benefit restrictions or shortfall amortization relevant to the
current period.
The expected future benefit payments, net of
participants contributions, with respect to the defined
benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans,
are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
Non-U.S.
|
|
|
U.S.
|
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
Plans
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
108
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
2010
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
|
139
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
2011
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
2012
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
2013
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
22
|
|
2014-2018
|
|
|
650
|
|
|
|
1,111
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
125
|
|
Defined
Contribution Plans
In addition to several small defined contribution plans, AIG
sponsors a voluntary savings plan for U.S. employees which
provides for salary reduction contributions by employees and
matching U.S. contributions by
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 309
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
AIG of up to seven percent of annual salary depending on the
employees years of service. Pre-tax expense associated
with this plan was $124 million, $114 million and
$104 million in 2008, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
|
|
19.
|
Ownership
and Transactions With Related Parties
|
(a) Ownership: According to the
Schedule 13D filed on January 22, 2009 by Maurice R.
Greenberg, Edward E. Matthews, Starr International Company,
Inc., C.V. Starr & Co., Inc., Universal Foundation,
Inc., The Maurice R. and Corinne P. Greenberg Family Foundation,
Inc., Maurice R. and Corinne P. Greenberg Joint Tenancy Company,
LLC and C.V. Starr & Co., Inc. Trust, these reporting
persons could be deemed to beneficially own
270,491,939 shares of AIGs common stock at that date.
Based on the shares of AIGs common stock outstanding at
January 30, 2009, this ownership would represent
approximately 10.1 percent of the voting stock of AIG.
Although these reporting persons have made filings under
Section 16 of the Exchange Act, reporting sales of shares
of common stock, no amendment to the Schedule 13D has been
filed to report a change in ownership subsequent to
January 22, 2009.
(b) For discussion of the Series C
Preferred Stock and the ownership by the Trust for the sole
benefit of the United States Treasury of a majority of the
voting equity interest of AIG, see Note 15 herein.
The pretax components of U.S. and foreign income reflect
the locations in which such pretax income (loss) was generated.
The pretax U.S. and foreign income (loss) was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
U.S
|
|
$
|
(105,179
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3,957
|
)
|
|
$
|
9,862
|
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(3,582
|
)
|
|
|
12,900
|
|
|
|
11,825
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(108,761
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,943
|
|
|
$
|
21,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision for income taxes were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Foreign and U.S. components of actual income tax expense
(benefit):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
1,537
|
|
|
$
|
3,157
|
|
|
$
|
2,725
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(1,812
|
)
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
|
933
|
|
U.S.:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
2,764
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
(8,268
|
)
|
|
|
(2,225
|
)
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
(8,374
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,455
|
|
|
$
|
6,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
310 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
The U.S. federal income tax rate was 35 percent for
2008, 2007 and 2006. Actual tax expense on income loss differs
from the statutory amount computed by applying the federal
income tax rate because of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Pretax
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Pretax
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Pretax
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
U.S. federal income tax (benefit) at statutory rate
|
|
$
|
(38,066
|
)
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,130
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
|
$
|
7,591
|
|
|
|
35.0
|
%
|
Adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
20,673
|
|
|
|
(19.0
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign operations
|
|
|
5,189
|
|
|
|
(4.8
|
)%
|
|
|
(565
|
)
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(132
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)%
|
Uncertain tax positions
|
|
|
1,113
|
|
|
|
(1.0
|
)%
|
|
|
622
|
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,401
|
|
|
|
(1.3
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax exempt interest
|
|
|
(843
|
)
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
|
(823
|
)
|
|
|
(9.2
|
)%
|
|
|
(718
|
)
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)%
|
Partnerships and joint ventures
|
|
|
279
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)%
|
|
|
(312
|
)
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)%
|
|
|
(265
|
)
|
|
|
(1.2
|
)%
|
Tax credits
|
|
|
(59
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
(127
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(196
|
)
|
|
|
(0.9
|
)%
|
Dividends received deduction
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
(1.4
|
)%
|
|
|
(102
|
)
|
|
|
(0.5
|
)%
|
State income taxes
|
|
|
(63
|
)
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
SICO benefit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
%
|
|
|
(194
|
)
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,146
|
|
|
|
(2.0
|
)%
|
|
|
(192
|
)
|
|
|
(2.2
|
)%
|
|
|
300
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Actual income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
$
|
(8,374
|
)
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,455
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,537
|
|
|
|
30.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of the net deferred tax asset were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Deferred tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss reserve discount
|
|
$
|
2,105
|
|
|
$
|
2,249
|
|
Unearned premium reserve reduction
|
|
|
1,179
|
|
|
|
1,743
|
|
Unrealized depreciation of investments
|
|
|
12,401
|
|
|
|
1,503
|
|
Unrealized (gains)/losses related to available for sale debt
securities
|
|
|
3,649
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan loss and other reserves
|
|
|
1,166
|
|
|
|
1,408
|
|
Investments in foreign subsidiaries and joint ventures
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,121
|
|
Adjustment to life policy reserves
|
|
|
3,226
|
|
|
|
3,213
|
|
NOLs and tax attributes*
|
|
|
25,632
|
|
|
|
1,814
|
|
Accruals not currently deductible, and other
|
|
|
2,617
|
|
|
|
1,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets
|
|
|
51,975
|
|
|
|
14,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 311
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred policy acquisition costs
|
|
|
(11,462
|
)
|
|
|
(11,716
|
)
|
Flight equipment, fixed assets and intangible assets
|
|
|
(5,593
|
)
|
|
|
( 5,239
|
)
|
Investments in foreign subsidiaries and joint ventures
|
|
|
(2,321
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (gains)/losses related to available for sale debt
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,399
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(717
|
)
|
|
|
(1,041
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
|
$
|
(20,093
|
)
|
|
$
|
(19,395
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset (liability) before valuation allowance
|
|
$
|
31,882
|
|
|
$
|
(5,039
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(20,896
|
)
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net deferred tax asset (liability)
|
|
$
|
10,986
|
|
|
$
|
(5,262
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
AIG has operating loss carryforwards as of December 31,
2008 and 2007 in the amount of $47.3 billion and
$4.5 billion, and unused foreign tax credits of
$2.2 billion and $639 million, respectively. Net
operating loss carryforwards may be carried forward for twenty
years while unused foreign tax credits may be carried forward
for ten years. As of December 31, 2008, AIG has capital
loss carryforwards of $20.9 billion, which will expire in
five years. AIG has recorded deferred tax assets for general
business credits of $260 million and $56 million, and
deferred tax assets for minimum tax credits of $250 million
and $101 million for the years ending December 31,
2008 and 2007, respectively. Unused general business credits
will expire in twenty years, while unused minimum tax credits
are available for future use without expiration. |
Valuation
Allowances
At December 31, 2008, AIG recorded a net deferred tax asset
after valuation allowance of $11 billion compared to a net
deferred tax liability of $5.3 billion at December 31,
2007. At December 31, 2008 and 2007, AIG recorded deferred
tax asset valuation allowances of $20.9 billion and
$0.2 billion, respectively, to reduce net deferred tax
assets to amounts AIG considered more likely than not (a
likelihood of more than 50 percent) to be realized. Realization
of AIGs net deferred tax asset depends on its ability to
generate sufficient taxable income of the appropriate character
within the carryforward periods of the jurisdictions in which
the net operating and capital losses, deductible temporary
differences and credits were incurred.
As of December 31, 2008, AIG had a cumulative loss for
financial reporting purposes in recent years. When making its
assessment about the realization of its deferred tax assets at
December 31, 2008, AIG considered all available evidence,
including (i) the nature, frequency, and severity of current and
cumulative financial reporting losses, (ii) actions completed
during 2008 and expected to be completed during 2009 that are
designed to eliminate or limit a recurrence of the factors that
contributed to the recent cumulative losses, giving greater
weight to actions completed through December 31, 2008, and
to the expectation that strategies will be executed in 2009 to
mitigate credit losses in the future on certain classes of
invested assets, (iii) the carryforward periods for the net
operating and capital loss and foreign tax credit carryforwards,
(iv) the sources and timing of future taxable income, giving
greater weight to discrete sources and to earlier future years
in the forecast period, and (v) tax planning strategies that
would be implemented, if necessary, to accelerate taxable
amounts.
Cumulative losses in recent years were principally related to
securities losses, which included the super senior multi-sector
CDS portfolio and the securities lending portfolio. In the
fourth quarter of 2008, AIG entered into two transactions with
the NY Fed (NY Fed Transactions) designed to provide solutions
to the credit deterioration of the AIGFP multi-sector CDS
portfolio and the securities lending portfolio. AIG expects
these transactions to significantly limit future losses
associated with the CDS portfolio and the securities lending
portfolio.
312 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
On March 2, 2009, AIG, the NY Fed and the United States
Department of the Treasury announced agreements in principle to
modify the terms of the Fed Facility and the Series D
Preferred Stock and provide a $30 billion equity capital
commitment facility. The parties also announced their intention
to take a number of other actions intended to strengthen
AIGs capital position, enhance its liquidity, reduce its
borrowing costs and facilitate AIGs asset disposition
program. See Note 23 herein.
These transactions executed in the fourth quarter of 2008 and
expected to be executed in 2009 were considered significant
positive evidence that allowed management to conclude that a
portion of AIGs deferred tax assets is more likely than
not to be realizable. AIG also considered future income in the
near term, tax gains from dispositions, and tax-planning
strategies AIG would implement, if necessary, to realize the net
deferred tax asset.
In view of the announcement on March 2, 2009 regarding
agreements in principle with the United States Department of the
Treasury and the NY Fed and other proposed arrangements with the
NY Fed, as well as AIGs projections of income, gain, and
loss, AIGs Management has concluded that
$11.0 billion of net deferred tax assets are recoverable at
December 31, 2008 and accordingly established a valuation
allowance of $20.9 billion as of December 31, 2008 in
order to reduce AIGs deferred tax assets to an amount that
is more likely than not to be realized.
In evaluating the realizability of the loss carryforwards, AIG
considered the relief provided by IRS Notice 2008-84 which
provides that the limitation on loss carryforwards that can
arise as a result of one or more acquisitions of stock of a loss
company will not apply to such stock acquisitions for any period
during which the United States becomes a direct or indirect
owner of more than 50 percent interest in the loss company.
At December 31, 2008, AIG has recorded deferred tax assets
related to stock compensation of $239 million. Due to the
significant decline in AIGs stock price, these deferred
tax assets may not be realizable in the future. FAS 123(R)
precludes AIG from recognizing an impairment charge on these
assets until the related stock awards are either exercised,
vested or expired. Any charge associated with the deferred tax
asset would likely be reflected in additional paid-in capital
rather than income tax expense.
Undistributed
Earnings
During 2008, AIG recorded $3.9 billion of deferred tax
expense attributable to the undistributed earnings of its
non-U.S. subsidiaries
and $0.7 billion attributable to its
U.S. subsidiaries. Deferred tax expense for its
non-U.S. subsidiaries
recorded in 2008 is related to current year activity as well as
deferred taxes that previously were not provided because the
earnings were considered to be reinvested indefinitely. At
December 31, 2008, AIG has provided deferred taxes related
to all the undistributed earnings of its
non-U.S. subsidiaries.
Tax
Filings and Examinations
AIG and its eligible U.S. subsidiaries file a consolidated
U.S. federal income tax return. Several
U.S. subsidiaries included in the consolidated financial
statements file separate U.S. federal income tax returns
and are not part of the AIG U.S. consolidated income tax
group. Subsidiaries operating outside the U.S. are taxed,
and income tax expense is recorded, based on applicable
U.S. and foreign law.
The statute of limitations for all tax years prior to 2000 has
now expired for AIGs consolidated federal income tax
return. AIG is currently under examination for the tax years
2000 through 2002.
In April 2008, AIG filed a refund claim for years 1997 through
2006. A refund claim filed in June 2007 for years 1991 through
1996 is still pending. These refund claims relate to the tax
effects of the restatements of AIGs 2004 and prior
financial statements.
On March 20, 2008, AIG received a Statutory Notice of
Deficiency (Notice) from the IRS for years 1997 to 1999. The
Notice asserted that AIG owes additional taxes and penalties for
these years primarily due to the disallowance of foreign tax
credits associated with cross-border financing transactions. The
transactions that are the subject of the Notice extend beyond
the period covered by the Notice, and it is likely that the IRS
will seek to challenge these later periods. It is also possible
that the IRS will consider other transactions to be similar to
these
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 313
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
transactions. AIG has paid the assessed tax plus interest and
penalties for 1997 and has filed a claim for refund. On
February 26, 2009, AIG filed suit for a refund in the
United States District Court for the Southern District of New
York. AIG has also paid additional taxes, interest, and
penalties assessed for 1998 and 1999. AIG will vigorously defend
its position, and continues to believe that it has adequate
reserves for any liability that could result from the IRS
actions.
On October 6, 2008, AIG notified the IRS of its decision to
participate in an IRS settlement initiative with respect to
certain tax payers that participated in targeted leasing
transactions. In accordance with FIN 48 and
FSP 13-2,
AIG recorded an after-tax charge of $110 million for this
matter in 2008.
FIN 48
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the
total amounts of gross unrecognized tax benefits is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Gross unrecognized tax benefits, beginning of year
|
|
$
|
1,310
|
|
|
$
|
1,138
|
|
Agreed audit adjustments with taxing authorities included in the
beginning balance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(188
|
)
|
Increases in tax positions for prior years
|
|
|
1,339
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
Decreases in tax positions for prior years
|
|
|
(322
|
)
|
|
|
(189
|
)
|
Increases in tax positions for current year
|
|
|
1,092
|
|
|
|
82
|
|
Lapse in statute of limitations
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Settlements
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
|
(178
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrecognized tax benefits, end of year
|
|
$
|
3,368
|
|
|
$
|
1,310
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 and 2007, AIGs unrecognized
tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, were
$3.4 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively. As of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, AIGs unrecognized tax
benefits included $665 million and $299 million,
respectively, related to tax positions the disallowance of which
would not affect the effective tax rate. Accordingly, as of
December 31, 2008 and 2007, the amounts of unrecognized tax
benefits that, if recognized, would favorably affect the
effective tax rate were $2.7 billion and $1.0 billion,
respectively.
Interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are
recognized in income tax expense. At December 31, 2008 and
2007, AIG had accrued $426 million and $281 million,
respectively, for the payment of interest (net of the federal
benefit) and penalties. For the years ended December 31,
2008 and 2007, AIG recognized $201 million and
$170 million, respectively, of interest (net of the federal
benefit) and penalties in the Consolidated Statement of Income.
AIG continually evaluates adjustments proposed by taxing
authorities. At December 31, 2008, such proposed
adjustments would not result in a material change to AIGs
consolidated financial condition, although it is possible that
the effect could be material to AIGs consolidated results
of operations for an individual reporting period Although it is
reasonably possible that a significant change in the balance of
unrecognized tax benefits may occur within the next twelve
months, at this time it is not possible to estimate the range of
the change due to the uncertainty of the potential outcomes.
314 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Listed below are the tax years that remain subject to
examination by major tax jurisdictions:
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
|
Major Tax Jurisdictions
|
|
Open Tax Years
|
|
United States
|
|
|
2000-2007
|
|
France
|
|
|
2005-2007
|
|
Hong Kong
|
|
|
2003-2007
|
|
Japan
|
|
|
2001-2007
|
|
Korea
|
|
|
2003-2007
|
|
Malaysia
|
|
|
2002-2007
|
|
Singapore
|
|
|
2001-2007
|
|
Taiwan
|
|
|
2000-2007
|
|
Thailand
|
|
|
2006-2007
|
|
United Kingdom
|
|
|
2006-2007
|
|
The reserve for Uncertain Tax Position increased in 2008 by
approximately $2 billion primarily relating to expenses
incurred in connection with the Federal Facility and foreign tax
credits associated with cross border financing transactions.
|
|
21.
|
Quarterly
Financial Information (Unaudited)
|
The following quarterly financial information for each of the
three months ended March 31, June 30, September 30 and
December 31, 2008 and 2007 is unaudited. However, in the
opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of
normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of
the results of operations for such periods have been made.
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
September 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share data)
|
|
|
Total revenues(a)(b)
|
|
$
|
14,031
|
|
|
$
|
30,645
|
|
|
$
|
19,933
|
|
|
$
|
31,150
|
|
|
$
|
898
|
|
|
$
|
29,836
|
|
|
$
|
(23,758
|
)
|
|
$
|
18,433
|
|
Income (loss) before income taxes and minority
interest(a)(b)
|
|
|
(11,264
|
)
|
|
|
6,172
|
|
|
|
(8,756
|
)
|
|
|
6,328
|
|
|
|
(28,185
|
)
|
|
|
4,879
|
|
|
|
(60,556
|
)
|
|
|
(8,436
|
)
|
Net income (loss)(c)
|
|
$
|
(7,805
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,130
|
|
|
$
|
(5,357
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,277
|
|
|
$
|
(24,468
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,085
|
|
|
$
|
(61,659
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,292
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
(3.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.58
|
|
|
$
|
(2.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
$
|
(9.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.20
|
|
|
$
|
(22.95
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.08
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
$
|
(3.09
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.58
|
|
|
$
|
(2.06
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
$
|
(9.05
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.19
|
|
|
$
|
(22.95
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2.08
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
2,528
|
|
|
|
2,612
|
|
|
|
2,605
|
|
|
|
2,602
|
|
|
|
2,703
|
|
|
|
2,576
|
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
2,528
|
|
|
|
2,621
|
|
|
|
2,605
|
|
|
|
2,613
|
|
|
|
2,703
|
|
|
|
2,589
|
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
|
|
2,550
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Both revenues and income (loss) before income taxes and
minority interest include (i) an unrealized market
valuation loss of $9.1 billion, $5.6 billion,
$7.1 billion, and $6.9 billion, in the first, second,
third and fourth quarter of 2008, respectively, and
$352 million and $11.1 billion in the third and fourth
quarter of 2007, respectively, on AIGFPs super senior
credit default swap portfolio and (ii) other-than-temporary
impairment charges of $5.6 billion, $6.8 billion,
$19.9 billion, and $18.6 billion in the first, second,
third and fourth quarter of 2008, respectively, and
$3.3 billion in the fourth quarter of 2007. |
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 315
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
(b) |
|
In the fourth quarter of 2008, both revenues and income
(loss) before income taxes and minority interest include a
credit valuation adjustment loss of $7.8 billion. |
|
(c) |
|
In 2008, includes a $20.6 billion valuation allowance to
reduce AIGs deferred tax asset to an amount AIG believes
is more likely than not to be realized, and a $5.5 billion
deferred tax expense attributable to the potential sale of
foreign businesses. |
|
|
22.
|
Information
Provided in Connection With Outstanding Debt
|
The following condensed consolidating financial statements
reflect the results of AIG Life Holdings (US), Inc. (AIGLH),
formerly known as American General Corporation, a holding
company and a wholly owned subsidiary of AIG. AIG provides a
full and unconditional guarantee of all outstanding debt of
AIGLH.
In addition, AIG Liquidity Corp. and AIG Program Funding, Inc.
are both wholly owned subsidiaries of AIG. AIG provides a full
and unconditional guarantee of all obligations of AIG Liquidity
Corp. and AIG Program Funding, Inc. There are no reportable
amounts for these entities.
316 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Condensed
Consolidating Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
(As Guarantor)
|
|
|
AIGLH
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
AIG
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments(a)
|
|
$
|
16,110
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
753,181
|
|
|
$
|
(132,379
|
)
|
|
$
|
636,912
|
|
Loans to subsidiaries(b)
|
|
|
64,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(64,283
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,539
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,642
|
|
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries(b)
|
|
|
65,724
|
|
|
|
23,256
|
|
|
|
34,499
|
|
|
|
(123,479
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Debt issuance costs, including prepaid commitment asset of
$15,458 in 2008
|
|
|
15,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,743
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
11,707
|
|
|
|
2,626
|
|
|
|
185,095
|
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
|
|
199,121
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
173,670
|
|
|
$
|
25,882
|
|
|
$
|
917,031
|
|
|
$
|
(256,165
|
)
|
|
$
|
860,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance liabilities
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
503,171
|
|
|
$
|
(103
|
)
|
|
$
|
503,068
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank of New York credit facility
|
|
|
40,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,431
|
|
Other long-term debt
|
|
|
47,928
|
|
|
|
2,097
|
|
|
|
234,701
|
|
|
|
(131,954
|
)
|
|
|
152,772
|
|
Other liabilities(a)
|
|
|
32,601
|
|
|
|
3,063
|
|
|
|
75,670
|
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
|
111,437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
120,960
|
|
|
|
5,160
|
|
|
|
813,542
|
|
|
|
(131,954
|
)
|
|
|
807,708
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
52,710
|
|
|
|
20,722
|
|
|
|
103,489
|
|
|
|
(124,211
|
)
|
|
|
52,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
173,670
|
|
|
$
|
25,882
|
|
|
$
|
917,031
|
|
|
$
|
(256,165
|
)
|
|
$
|
860,418
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
$
|
14,712
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
836,506
|
|
|
$
|
(21,790
|
)
|
|
$
|
829,468
|
|
Cash
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2,199
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
Investment in consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
111,650
|
|
|
|
24,396
|
|
|
|
17,952
|
|
|
|
(153,998
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
9,414
|
|
|
|
2,592
|
|
|
|
204,448
|
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
|
216,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
135,860
|
|
|
$
|
27,029
|
|
|
$
|
1,061,105
|
|
|
$
|
(175,633
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,048,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance liabilities
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
528,059
|
|
|
$
|
(75
|
)
|
|
$
|
528,027
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
36,045
|
|
|
|
2,136
|
|
|
|
156,003
|
|
|
|
(18,135
|
)
|
|
|
176,049
|
|
Other liabilities
|
|
|
3,971
|
|
|
|
2,826
|
|
|
|
244,772
|
|
|
|
(3,085
|
)
|
|
|
248,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
40,059
|
|
|
|
4,962
|
|
|
|
928,834
|
|
|
|
(21,295
|
)
|
|
|
952,560
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
95,801
|
|
|
|
22,067
|
|
|
|
132,271
|
|
|
|
(154,338
|
)
|
|
|
95,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
135,860
|
|
|
$
|
27,029
|
|
|
$
|
1,061,105
|
|
|
$
|
(175,633
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,048,361
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes intercompany derivative positions, which are
reported at fair value before credit valuation adjustment. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Eliminated in consolidation. |
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 317
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Condensed
Consolidating Statement of Income (Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
As Guarantor
|
|
|
AIGLH
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
AIG
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(20,512
|
)
|
|
$
|
(92
|
)
|
|
$
|
(88,157
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(108,761
|
)
|
Equity in undistributed net income (loss) of consolidated
subsidiaries(a)
|
|
|
(61,542
|
)
|
|
|
(17,027
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
78,569
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from consolidated subsidiaries(a)
|
|
|
2,399
|
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,474
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)(b)
|
|
|
19,634
|
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(27,991
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(8,374
|
)
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,098
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(99,289
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,027
|
)
|
|
$
|
(59,068
|
)
|
|
$
|
76,095
|
|
|
$
|
(99,289
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(2,379
|
)
|
|
$
|
(152
|
)
|
|
$
|
11,474
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,943
|
|
Equity in undistributed net income of consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
3,121
|
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,094
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
4,685
|
|
|
|
1,358
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,043
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(773
|
)
|
|
|
248
|
|
|
|
1,980
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,455
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,288
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,288
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
6,200
|
|
|
$
|
931
|
|
|
$
|
8,206
|
|
|
$
|
(9,137
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(786
|
)
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
22,351
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,687
|
|
Equity in undistributed net income of consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
13,308
|
|
|
|
1,263
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,571
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from consolidated subsidiaries
|
|
|
1,689
|
|
|
|
602
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,291
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
|
6,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,537
|
|
Minority interest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,136
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,136
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
14,048
|
|
|
$
|
2,118
|
|
|
$
|
14,744
|
|
|
$
|
(16,862
|
)
|
|
$
|
14,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Eliminated in consolidation. |
|
|
|
(b) |
|
Income taxes recorded by the Parent company include deferred
tax expense attributable to the potential sale of foreign and
domestic businesses and a valuation allowance to reduce the
consolidated deferred tax asset to the amount more likely than
not to be realized. See Note 20 to the Consolidated
Financial Statements for additional information. |
318 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Condensed
Consolidating Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
As Guarantor
|
|
|
AIGLH
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
AIG
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(1,896
|
)
|
|
$
|
178
|
|
|
$
|
2,473
|
|
|
$
|
755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funding to establish Maiden Lane III LLC
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
Invested assets disposed
|
|
|
10,704
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
190,491
|
|
|
|
201,195
|
|
Invested assets acquired
|
|
|
(4,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(190,311
|
)
|
|
|
(194,511
|
)
|
Loans to subsidiaries
|
|
|
(86,045
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
86,045
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(7,617
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,417
|
|
|
|
45,800
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(92,158
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
139,642
|
|
|
|
47,484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank of New York credit facility borrowings
|
|
|
96,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
96,650
|
|
Repayment of Federal Reserve Bank of New York credit facility
borrowings
|
|
|
(59,850
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(59,850
|
)
|
Issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
21,142
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
92,358
|
|
|
|
113,501
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(5,143
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(133,808
|
)
|
|
|
(138,951
|
)
|
Proceeds from common stock issued
|
|
|
7,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,343
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of Series D preferred stock and
common stock warrant
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
Payments advanced to purchase shares
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
Cash dividends paid to shareholders
|
|
|
(1,628
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,628
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(3,441
|
)
|
|
|
(180
|
)
|
|
|
(94,363
|
)
|
|
|
(97,984
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
94,073
|
|
|
|
(179
|
)
|
|
|
(135,813
|
)
|
|
|
(41,919
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
|
38
|
|
Change in cash
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
|
6,340
|
|
|
|
6,358
|
|
Cash at beginning of year
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
2,199
|
|
|
|
2,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of year
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,539
|
|
|
$
|
8,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 319
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
American
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
International
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Group, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
|
As Guarantor
|
|
|
AIGLH
|
|
|
Subsidiaries
|
|
|
AIG
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(774
|
)
|
|
$
|
214
|
|
|
$
|
35,731
|
|
|
$
|
35,171
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invested assets disposed
|
|
|
3,586
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
174,672
|
|
|
|
178,258
|
|
Invested assets acquired
|
|
|
(10,029
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(199,524
|
)
|
|
|
(209,553
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(6,051
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30,488
|
)
|
|
|
(36,539
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(12,494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(55,340
|
)
|
|
|
(67,834
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
20,582
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82,628
|
|
|
|
103,210
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(1,253
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(78,485
|
)
|
|
|
(79,738
|
)
|
Payments advanced to purchase shares
|
|
|
(6,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,000
|
)
|
Cash dividends paid to shareholders
|
|
|
(1,881
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,881
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
1,828
|
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
16,101
|
|
|
|
17,716
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
13,276
|
|
|
|
(213
|
)
|
|
|
20,244
|
|
|
|
33,307
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
50
|
|
Change in cash
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
|
694
|
|
Cash at beginning of year
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,514
|
|
|
|
1,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of year
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2,199
|
|
|
$
|
2,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(2,602
|
)
|
|
$
|
258
|
|
|
$
|
8,596
|
|
|
$
|
6,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Invested assets disposed
|
|
|
3,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
154,763
|
|
|
|
158,106
|
|
Invested assets acquired
|
|
|
(8,239
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(196,187
|
)
|
|
|
(204,426
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
(2,313
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(18,214
|
)
|
|
|
(20,594
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(7,209
|
)
|
|
|
(67
|
)
|
|
|
(59,638
|
)
|
|
|
(66,914
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
12,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59,023
|
|
|
|
71,028
|
|
Repayments of long-term debt
|
|
|
(2,417
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(34,072
|
)
|
|
|
(36,489
|
)
|
Cash dividends paid to shareholders
|
|
|
(1,638
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,638
|
)
|
Other
|
|
|
1,747
|
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
25,784
|
|
|
|
27,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
9,697
|
|
|
|
(191
|
)
|
|
|
50,735
|
|
|
|
60,241
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
Change in cash
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(193
|
)
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
Cash at beginning of year
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,707
|
|
|
|
1,897
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of year
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,514
|
|
|
$
|
1,590
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
320 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Supplementary disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Intercompany non-cash financing/investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement of repurchase agreement with loan receivable
|
|
$
|
3,160
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Capital contributions in the form of bonds
|
|
|
3,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable forgiven through capital contributions
|
|
|
11,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-cash capital contributions to subsidiaries
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
|
|
During the second quarter of 2008, AIG made certain revisions to
the American International Group, Inc. (as Guarantor) Condensed
Statement of Cash Flows, primarily relating to the effect of
reclassifying certain intercompany and securities lending
balances. Accordingly, AIG revised the previous periods
presented to conform to the revised presentation. There was no
effect on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows or ending
cash balances.
The revisions and their effect on the American International
Group, Inc. (as Guarantor) Condensed Statement of Cash Flows for
the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Reported
|
|
|
Revisions
|
|
|
As Revised
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(770
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(774
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(10,737
|
)
|
|
|
(1,757
|
)
|
|
|
(12,494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$
|
11,515
|
|
|
$
|
1,761
|
|
|
$
|
13,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(590
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,012
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,602
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(7,643
|
)
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
(7,209
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$
|
8,119
|
|
|
$
|
1,578
|
|
|
$
|
9,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March
2009 Agreements in Principle
On March 2, 2009, AIG, the NY Fed and the United States
Department of the Treasury announced agreements in principle to
modify the terms of the Fed Credit Agreement and the
Series D Preferred Stock and to provide a $30 billion
equity capital commitment facility.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 321
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Modification
to Series D Preferred Stock
On March 2, 2009, AIG and the United States Department of
the Treasury announced their agreement in principle to enter
into a transaction pursuant to which the United States
Department of the Treasury would modify the terms of the
Series D Preferred Stock. The modification will be effected
by an exchange of 100 percent of the outstanding shares of
Series D Preferred Stock for newly issued perpetual serial
preferred stock (Series E Preferred Stock), with a
liquidation preference equal to the issuance-date liquidation
preference of the Series D Preferred Stock surrendered plus
accumulated but unpaid dividends thereon. The terms of the
Series E Preferred Stock will be the same as for the
Series D Preferred Stock except that the dividends will not
be cumulative. The Series D Preferred Stock bore cumulative
dividends.
The dividend rate on both the cumulative Series D Preferred
Stock and the non-cumulative Series E Preferred Stock is
10 percent per annum. Concurrent with the exchange of the
shares of Series D Preferred Stock for the Series E
Preferred Stock, AIG will enter into a replacement capital
covenant in favor of the holders of a series of AIG debt,
pursuant to which AIG will agree that prior to the third
anniversary of the issuance of the Series E Preferred Stock
AIG will not repay, redeem or purchase, and no subsidiary of AIG
will purchase, all or any part of the Series E Preferred
Stock except with the proceeds obtained from the issuance by AIG
or any subsidiary of AIG of certain capital securities. AIG will
make a statement of intent substantially similar to the
replacement capital covenant with respect to subsequent years.
The Series D Preferred Stock was not subject to a
replacement capital covenant.
Equity
Capital Commitment Facility
On March 2, 2009, AIG and the United States Department of
the Treasury announced an agreement in principle to provide a
5-year
equity capital commitment facility of $30 billion. AIG may
use the facility to sell to the United States Department of the
Treasury fixed-rate, non-cumulative perpetual serial preferred
stock (Series F Preferred Stock). The facility will be
available to AIG so long as AIG is not the debtor in a pending
case under Title 11, United States Code, and the Trust (or
any successor entity established for the benefit of the United
States Treasury) beneficially owns more than 50
percent of the aggregate voting power of AIGs voting
securities at the time of such drawdown.
The terms of the Series F Preferred Stock will be
substantially similar to the Series E Preferred Stock,
except that the Series F Preferred Stock will not be
subject to a replacement capital covenant or the statement of
intent.
In connection with the equity capital commitment facility, the
United States Department of the Treasury will also receive
warrants exercisable for a number of shares of common stock of
AIG equal to 1 percent of AIGs then outstanding common
stock and, upon issuance of the warrants, the dividends payable
on, and the voting power of, the Series C Preferred Stock
will be reduced by the number of shares subject to the warrant.
Repayment
of Fed Facility with Subsidiary Preferred Equity
On March 2, 2009, AIG and the NY Fed announced their intent
to enter into a transaction pursuant to which AIG will transfer
to the NY Fed preferred equity interests in newly-formed special
purpose vehicles (SPVs), in settlement of a portion of the
outstanding balance of the Fed Facility. Each SPV will have
(directly or indirectly) as its only asset 100 percent of the
common stock of an AIG operating subsidiary (AIA in one case and
ALICO in the other). AIG expects to own the common interests of
each SPV. In exchange for the preferred equity interests
received by the NY Fed, there would be a concurrent substantial
reduction in the outstanding balance and maximum available
amount to be borrowed on the Fed Facility.
Securitizations
On March 2, 2009, AIG and the NY Fed announced their intent
to enter into a transaction pursuant to which AIG will issue to
the NY Fed senior certificates in one or more newly-formed SPVs
backed by inforce blocks of life insurance policies in
settlement of a portion of the outstanding balance of the Fed
Facility. The amount of the Fed
322 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Notes to
Consolidated Financial
Statements (Continued)
Facility reduction will be based on the proceeds received. The
SPVs are expected to be consolidated by AIG. These transfers are
subject to agreement on definitive terms and regulatory
approvals at a later date.
Modification
to Fed Facility
On March 2, 2009, AIG and the NY Fed announced their
agreement in principle to amend the Fed Credit Agreement to
remove the interest rate floor. Under the current terms,
interest accrues on the outstanding borrowings under the Fed
Facility at three-month LIBOR (no less than 3.5 percent) plus
3.0 percent per annum. The 3.5 percent LIBOR floor will be
eliminated following the amendment. In addition, the Fed
Facility will be amended to ensure that the total commitment
will be at least $25 billion, even after giving effect to
the repayment of the Fed Facility with subsidiary preferred
equity and securitization transactions described above. These
proceeds are expected to substantially reduce the outstanding
borrowings under the Fed Facility from the amount outstanding as
of December 31, 2008.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 323
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Part II
Other Information
|
|
Item 9.
|
Changes
in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that
information required to be disclosed in reports filed or
submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC
rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosures. In connection with the
preparation of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
an evaluation was carried out by AIG management, with the
participation of AIGs Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of AIGs disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act)) as of
December 31, 2008. Based on this evaluation, AIGs
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that AIGs disclosure controls and procedures were
effective as of December 31, 2008.
Managements
Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
Management of AIG is responsible for establishing and
maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting.
AIGs internal control over financial reporting is a
process, under the supervision of AIGs Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, designed to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial
reporting and the preparation of AIGs financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with GAAP.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
AIG management conducted an assessment of the effectiveness of
AIGs internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2008 based on the criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO).
AIG management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2008,
AIGs internal control over financial reporting was
effective based on the criteria in Internal
Control Integrated Framework issued by the COSO.
The effectiveness of AIGs internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2008 has been audited by
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public
accounting firm, as stated in their report, which is included in
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Remediation
of Prior Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
AIG management previously identified and disclosed a material
weakness in internal control over financial reporting relating
to the fair value valuation of the AIGFP super senior credit
default swap portfolio and oversight thereof. A material
weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in
internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a
reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of
AIGs annual or interim financial statements will not be
prevented or detected on a timely basis.
AIG has been actively engaged in the implementation of
remediation efforts to address the material weakness in controls
over fair value valuation of the AIGFP super senior credit
default swap portfolio and oversight thereof that was in
existence at December 31, 2007. These remediation efforts,
outlined below, were specifically designed to address the
material weakness previously identified by AIG management.
AIGs remediation efforts were governed by a Steering
Committee, under the direction of AIGs Chief Audit
Executive and included AIGs Chief Risk Officer, Chief
Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and
324 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Comptroller. The status of remediation was reviewed with the
Audit Committee who was advised of issues encountered and key
decisions reached by AIG management.
As of December 31, 2007, AIG did not maintain effective
controls over the fair value valuation of the AIGFP super senior
credit default swap portfolio and oversight thereof.
Specifically, AIG had insufficient resources to design and carry
out effective controls to prevent or detect errors and to
determine appropriate disclosures on a timely basis with respect
to the processes and models introduced in the fourth quarter of
2007. As a result, AIG had not fully developed its controls to
assess, on a timely basis, the relevance to its valuation of all
third-party information. Also, controls to permit the
appropriate oversight and monitoring of the AIGFP super senior
credit default swap portfolio valuation process, including
timely sharing of information at the appropriate levels of the
organization, did not operate effectively. As a result, controls
over the AIGFP super senior credit default swap portfolio
valuation process and oversight thereof were not adequate to
prevent or detect misstatements in the accuracy of
managements fair value estimates and disclosures on a
timely basis.
During 2008, AIG management took the following actions to
remediate this material weakness:
|
|
|
|
|
Created a framework, including allocation of roles and
responsibilities, for the valuation and oversight for the
valuation of the super senior credit default swap portfolio (the
portfolio).
|
|
|
|
Designed and implemented enhanced controls over the valuation of
the portfolio including assessing the relevance and impact of
available third-party information and additional segregation of
duties.
|
|
|
|
Ensured improved oversight and governance, including increased
interaction with Corporate finance and risk management functions.
|
|
|
|
Enhanced communication by establishing formal reporting lines
between key AIGFP functions and AIG Corporate counterparts.
|
|
|
|
Implemented a valuation control group within AIGFP to perform
the controls, with appropriate allocation of qualified resources.
|
|
|
|
Developed new systems and processes to reduce the reliance on
manual controls.
|
|
|
|
Documented the process and controls over the valuation approach.
|
|
|
|
Assessed the design and tested the operating effectiveness of
the key controls over the fair value valuation process.
|
AIG continues to develop further enhancements to its controls
over the fair value valuation of the AIG super senior credit
default swap portfolio. Based upon the significant actions taken
and the testing and evaluation of the effectiveness of the
controls, AIG management has concluded the material weakness in
AIGs controls over the AIGFP super senior credit default
swap portfolio valuation process and oversight thereof no longer
existed as of December 31, 2008.
Continuing
Improvements to Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
AIG management recognizes the importance of continued attention
to improving its internal controls related to the period end
financial reporting and consolidation processes, investment
accounting, income tax, and valuation processes. Additionally,
in carrying out its restructuring plan, AIG is committed to
ensuring that the manual controls that have been established
remain effective and sustainable. To maintain effective and
sustainable controls, AIG has implemented retention programs to
seek to keep its key employees and has engaged third-party
resources to supplement the efforts of AIG financial personnel.
Furthermore, where consistent with the direction of its asset
disposition plan, AIG is investing in new systems and processes
which will allow it, over time, to reduce its reliance on manual
controls.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Changes in AIGs internal control over financial reporting
during the quarter ended December 31, 2008 that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, AIGs internal control over financial reporting
have been described above.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 325
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
Item 9B.
|
Other
Information
|
None.
Part III
|
|
Item 10.
|
Directors,
Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
Except for the information provided in Part I under the
heading Directors and Executive Officers of AIG,
information required by Item 10 of this
Form 10-K
is incorporated by reference from the definitive proxy statement
for AIGs 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will
be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the
close of the fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A.
|
|
Item 11.
|
Executive
Compensation
|
Information required by Item 11 of this
Form 10-K
is incorporated by reference from the definitive proxy statement
for AIGs 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will
be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the
close of the fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A.
|
|
Item 12.
|
Security
Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and
Related Stockholder Matters
|
Information required by Item 12 of this
Form 10-K
is incorporated by reference from the definitive proxy statement
for AIGs 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will
be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the
close of the fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A.
|
|
Item 13.
|
Certain
Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
Information required by Item 13 of this
Form 10-K
is incorporated by reference from the definitive proxy statement
for AIGs 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will
be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the
close of the fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A.
|
|
Item 14.
|
Principal
Accounting Fees and Services
|
Information required by Item 14 of this
Form 10-K
is incorporated by reference from the definitive proxy statement
for AIGs 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will
be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days after the
close of the fiscal year pursuant to Regulation 14A.
Part IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
Exhibits,
Financial Statement Schedules
|
(a) Financial Statements and Schedules. See accompanying
Index to Financial Statements.
(b) Exhibits. See accompanying Exhibit Index.
326 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has
duly caused this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized, on the 2nd of March, 2009.
AMERICAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP, INC.
(Edward M. Liddy, Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer)
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose
signature appears below constitutes and appoints Edward M. Liddy
and David L. Herzog, and each of them severally, his or her true
and lawful attorney-in-fact, with full power of substitution and
resubstitution, to sign in his or her name, place and stead, in
any and all capacities, to do any and all things and execute any
and all instruments that such attorney may deem necessary or
advisable under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
and any rules, regulations and requirements of the
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
and any and all amendments hereto, as fully for all intents and
purposes as he or she might or could do in person, and hereby
ratifies and confirms all said attorneys-in-fact and agents,
each acting alone, and his or her substitute or substitutes, may
lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended, this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the
Registrant and in the capacities indicated on the 2nd of
March, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Edward
M. Liddy
(Edward
M. Liddy)
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ David
L. Herzog
(David
L. Herzog)
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ Joseph
D. Cook
(Joseph
D. Cook)
|
|
Vice President and Comptroller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
|
|
/s/ Stephen
F. Bollenbach
(Stephen
F. Bollenbach)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dennis
D. Dammerman
(Dennis
D. Dammerman)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Martin
S. Feldstein
(Martin
S. Feldstein)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ George
L. Miles, Jr.
(George
L. Miles, Jr.)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Suzanne
Nora Johnson
(Suzanne
Nora Johnson)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Morris
W. Offit
(Morris
W. Offit)
|
|
Director
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 327
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ James
F. Orr III
(James
F. Orr III)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Virginia
M. Rometty
(Virginia
M. Rometty)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Michael
H. Sutton
(Michael
H. Sutton)
|
|
Director
|
|
|
|
/s/ Edmund
S.W. Tse
(Edmund
S.W. Tse)
|
|
Director
|
328 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
Location
|
|
2
|
|
Plan of acquisition, reorganization, arrangement, liquidation or
succession
|
|
|
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of May 11, 2001,
among American International Group, Inc., Washington Acquisition
Corporation and American General Corporation
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1(i)(a) to AIGs
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-62688).
|
3(i)(a)
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of AIG
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to AIGs Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
3(i)(b)
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of AIG,
filed June 3, 1998
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to AIGs
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
1998 (File No. 1-8787).
|
3(i)(c)
|
|
Certificate of Merger of SunAmerica Inc. with and into AIG,
filed December 30, 1998 and effective January 1, 1999
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) to AIGs Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
3(i)(d)
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation of AIG,
filed June 5, 2000
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i)(c) to AIGs
Registration Statement on Form S-4 (File No. 333-45828).
|
3(i)(e)
|
|
Certificate of Designations of Series D Fixed Rate
Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock of AIG
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 26, 2008 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
3(i)(f)
|
|
Form of Certificate of Designations of Series C Perpetual,
Convertible, Participating Preferred Stock of AIG
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
3(ii)(a)
|
|
AIG By-laws, amended January 16, 2008
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 17, 2008 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
4
|
|
Instruments defining the rights of security holders, including
indentures
|
|
Certain instruments defining the rights of holders of long-term
debt securities of AIG and its subsidiaries are omitted pursuant
to Item 601(b)(4)(iii) of Regulation S-K. AIG hereby undertakes
to furnish to the Commission, upon request, copies of any such
instruments.
|
|
|
(1) Credit Agreement, dated as of September 22, 2008,
between AIG and Federal Reserve Bank of New York
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 26, 2008
(File No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(2) Amendment No. 2, dated as of November 9,
2008, to the Credit Agreement dated as of September 22,
2008 between AIG and Federal Reserve Bank of New York
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to AIGs
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(3) Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of
November 25, 2008, between AIG and United States Department
of the Treasury
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 26, 2008 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(4) Indenture, dated as of November 1, 1991, between
International Lease Finance Corporation and U.S. Bank Trust
National Association (successor to Continental Bank, National
Association), as supplemented
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to International
Lease Finance Corporations Registration Statement on
Form S-3
(File
No. 33-43698).
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 329
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
Location
|
|
(5)
|
|
Indenture dated as of November 1, 2000, between International
Lease Finance Corporation and the Bank of New York, as
supplemented
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to International
Lease Finance Corporations Registration Statement on
Form S-3
(File
No. 333-49566).
|
(6)
|
|
Indenture dated as of August 1, 2006, between International
Lease Finance Corporation and Deutsche Bank Trust Company
Americas
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to International
Lease Finance Corporations Registration Statement on
Form S-3
(File
No. 333-136681).
|
(7)
|
|
Indenture dated as of May 1, 1999 from American General Finance
Corporation to Wilmington Trust Company (successor trustee to
Citibank, N.A.)
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a)(1) to American
General Finance Corporations Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2000 (File
No. 1-06155).
|
9
|
|
Voting Trust Agreement
|
|
None.
|
10
|
|
Material contracts
|
|
|
|
|
(1) AIG Amended and Restated 1996 Employee Stock Purchase
Plan*
|
|
Filed as exhibit to AIGs Definitive Proxy Statement dated
April 4, 2003 (File
No. 1-8787)
and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
(2) AIG 2003 Japan Employee Stock Purchase Plan*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 to AIGs
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-111737).
|
|
|
(3) AIG 1991 Employee Stock Option Plan*
|
|
Filed as exhibit to AIGs Definitive Proxy Statement dated
April 4, 1997 (File
No. 1-8787)
and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
(4) AIG Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan*
|
|
Filed as exhibit to AIGs Definitive Proxy Statement dated
April 4, 2003 (File
No. 1-8787)
and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
(5) Form of Stock Option Grant Agreement under the AIG
Amended and Restated 1999 Stock Option Plan*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to AIGs
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2004 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(6) AIG Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan*
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
(7) Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement under the
AIG Amended and Restated 2002 Stock Incentive Plan*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to AIGs
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September
30, 2004 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(8) AIG Executive Deferred Compensation Plan*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to AIGs
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-101640).
|
|
|
(9) AIG Supplemental Incentive Savings Plan*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b) to AIGs
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-101640).
|
|
|
(10) AIG Director Stock Plan*
|
|
Filed as an exhibit to AIGs Definitive Proxy Statement
dated April 5, 2004 (File
No. 1-8787)
and incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
|
(11) Purchase Agreement between AIA and Mr. E.S.W. Tse*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(l) to AIGs Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1997 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(12) Retention and Employment Agreement between AIG and Jay
S. Wintrob*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(m) to AIGs Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
330 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
Location
|
|
|
|
(13) SunAmerica Inc. 1988 Employee Stock Plan*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to AIGs
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-70069).
|
|
|
(14) SunAmerica 1997 Employee Incentive Stock Plan*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b) to AIGs
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-70069).
|
|
|
(15) SunAmerica Nonemployee Directors Stock Option
Plan*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c) to AIGs
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-70069).
|
|
|
(16) SunAmerica 1995 Performance Stock Plan*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(d) to AIGs
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-70069).
|
|
|
(17) SunAmerica Inc. 1998 Long-Term Performance-Based
Incentive Plan For the Chief Executive Officer*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(e) to AIGs
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-70069).
|
|
|
(18) SunAmerica Inc. Long-Term Performance-Based Incentive
Plan Amended and Restated 1997*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(f) to AIGs
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-70069).
|
|
|
(19) SunAmerica Five-Year Deferred Cash Plan*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to AIGs
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-31346).
|
|
|
(20) SunAmerica Executive Savings Plan*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b) to AIGs
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-31346).
|
|
|
(21) HSB Group, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(iii)(f) to HSBs
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1999
(File
No. 1-13135).
|
|
|
(22) HSB Group, Inc. Employees Thrift Incentive Plan*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(i)(c) to The Hartford
Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Companys
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 33-36519).
|
|
|
(23) American General Corporation 1994 Stock and Incentive
Plan (January 2000)*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to American General
Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 1998 (File
No. 1-7981).
|
|
|
(24) Amendment to American General Corporation 1994 Stock
and Incentive Plan (January 1999)*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to American General
Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999 (File
No. 1-7981).
|
|
|
(25) Amendment to American General Corporation 1994 Stock
and Incentive Plan (January 2000)*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to American General
Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999 (File
No. 1-7981).
|
|
|
(26) Amendment to American General Corporation 1994 Stock
and Incentive Plan (November 2000)*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to American General
Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2000 (File
No. 1-7981).
|
|
|
(27) American General Corporation 1997 Stock and Incentive
Plan*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to American General
Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 1998 (File
No. 1-7981).
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 331
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
Location
|
|
|
|
(28) Amendment to American General Corporation 1997 Stock
and Incentive Plan (January 1999)*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to American General
Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999 (File
No. 1-7981).
|
|
|
(29) Amendment to American General Corporation 1997 Stock
and Incentive Plan (November 2000)*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to American General
Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2000 (File
No. 1-7981).
|
|
|
(30) American General Corporation 1999 Stock and Incentive
Plan*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to American General
Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1998 (File
No. 1-7981).
|
|
|
(31) Amendment to American General Corporation 1999 Stock
and Incentive Plan (January 1999)*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to American General
Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1999 (File
No. 1-7981).
|
|
|
(32) Amendment to American General Corporation 1999 Stock
and Incentive Plan (November 2000)*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to American General
Corporations Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended September 30, 2000 (File
No. 1-7981).
|
|
|
(33) Amended and Restated American General Corporation
Deferred Compensation Plan (12/11/00)*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to American General
Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000 (File
No. 1-7981).
|
|
|
(34) Amended and Restated Restoration of Retirement Income
Plan for Certain Employees Participating in the Restated
American General Retirement Plan (Restoration of Retirement
Income Plan) (12/31/98)*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to American General
Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000 (File
No. 1-7981).
|
|
|
(35) Amended and Restated American General Supplemental
Thrift Plan (12/31/98)*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to American General
Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000 (File
No. 1-7981).
|
|
|
(36) American General Employees Thrift and Incentive
Plan (restated July 1, 2001)*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to AIGs
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-68640).
|
|
|
(37) American General Agents and Managers
Thrift and Incentive Plan (restated July 1, 2001)*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b) to AIGs
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-68640).
|
|
|
(38) CommLoCo Thrift Plan (restated July 1, 2001)*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c) to AIGs
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-68640).
|
|
|
(39) Western National Corporation 1993 Stock and Incentive
Plan, as amended*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 to Western National
Corporations Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 1995 (File
No. 1-12540).
|
|
|
(40) USLIFE Corporation 1991 Stock Option Plan, as amended*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to USLIFE Corporations Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1995
(File
No. 1-5683).
|
332 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
Location
|
|
|
|
(41) Employment Agreement, Amendment to Employment
Agreement, and Split-Dollar Agreement, including Assignment of
Life Insurance Policy as Collateral, with Rodney O. Martin, Jr.*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(xx) to AIGs Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(42) Letter from AIG to Martin J. Sullivan, dated
March 16, 2005*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 17, 2005 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(43) Letter from AIG to Steven J. Bensinger, dated
March 16, 2005*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 17, 2005 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(44) Employment Agreement between AIG and Martin J.
Sullivan, dated as of June 27, 2005*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(1) to AIGs
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2005 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(45) Employment Agreement between AIG and Steven J.
Bensinger, dated as of June 27, 2005*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(3) to AIGs
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2005 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(46) Executive Severance Plan, effective as of
March 11, 2008*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 17, 2008 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(47) AIG Amended and Restated Executive Severance Plan*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 26, 2008
(File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(48) Assurance Agreement, by AIG in favor of eligible
employees, dated as of June 27, 2005, relating to certain
obligations of Starr International Company, Inc.*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(6) to AIGs
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2005 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(49) AIG 2005 Senior Partners Plan (amended and restated
effective December 31, 2008)*
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
(50) 2005/2006 Deferred Compensation Profit Participation Plan
for Senior Partners (amended and restated effective
December 31, 2008)*
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
(51) 2005/2006 Deferred Compensation Profit Participation Plan
for Partners (amended and restated effective December 31,
2008)*
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
(52) 2005/2006 Deferred Compensation Profit Participation Plan
RSU Award Agreement (amended and restated effective
December 31, 2008)*
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
(53) Summary of Non-Employee Director Compensation, dated
July 16, 2008*
|
|
Filed herewith
|
|
|
(54) AIG Special Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement with
Steven J. Bensinger, dated January 6, 2006*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 9, 2006 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(55) Agreement with the United States Department of
Justice, dated February 7, 2006
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 9, 2006 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(56) Final Judgment and Consent with the Securities and
Exchange Commission, including the related complaint, dated
February 9, 2006
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 9, 2006 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 333
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
Location
|
|
|
|
(57) Agreement between the Attorney General of the State of
New York and AIG and its Subsidiaries, dated January 18,
2006
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 9, 2006 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(58) Stipulation with the State of New York Insurance
Department, dated January 18, 2006
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 9, 2006 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(59) AIG Senior Partners Plan (amended and restated effective
December 31, 2008)*
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
(60) AIG Partners Plan (amended and restated effective
December 31, 2008)*
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
(61) AIG Executive Incentive Plan*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 22, 2006 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(62) AIG Amended and Restated 2007 Stock Incentive Plan*
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
(63) AIG Form of Stock Option Award Agreement*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.A to AIGs
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333- 148148).
|
|
|
(64) AIG Amended and Restated Form of Performance RSU Award
Agreement*
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
(65) AIG Amended and Restated Form of Time-Vested RSU Award
Agreement*
|
|
Filed herewith
|
|
|
(66) AIG Form of Time-Vested RSU Award Agreement with
Four-Year Pro Rata Vesting*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.D to AIGs
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333- 148148).
|
|
|
(67) AIG Amended and Restated Form of Time-Vested RSU Award
Agreement with Three-Year Pro Rata Vesting*
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
(68) AIG Amended and Restated Form of Time-Vested RSU Award
Agreement with Three-Year Pro Rata Vesting and with Early
Retirement*
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
(69) AIG Amended and Restated Form of Non-Employee Director
Deferred Stock Units Award Agreement*
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
(70) Letter Agreement between AIG and Martin J. Sullivan,
dated March 12, 2008*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 16, 2008 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(71) Letter Agreement between AIG and Steven J. Bensinger,
dated March 12, 2008*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 16, 2008 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(72) Letter Agreement between AIG and Martin J. Sullivan,
dated June 30, 2008*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 1, 2008 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(73) Employment Agreement Amendment between AIG and Steven
J. Bensinger, dated May 8, 2008*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 8, 2008 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(74) Letter Agreement between Robert B. Willumstad and AIG,
effective July 16, 2008*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 24, 2008
(File
No. 1-8787).
|
334 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
Location
|
|
|
|
(75) Sign-On Stock Option Award Agreement between Robert B.
Willumstad and AIG, effective July 16, 2008*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 24, 2008
(File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(76) Sign-On Restricted Share Award Agreement between
Robert B. Willumstad and AIG, effective July 16, 2008*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 24, 2008
(File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(77) Letter Agreement between Robert B. Willumstad and AIG,
dated December 26, 2008*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 30, 2008 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(78) Credit Agreement, dated as of September 22, 2008,
between AIG and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 26, 2008
(File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(79) Amendment No. 2, dated as of November 9,
2008, to the Credit Agreement dated as of September 22,
2008 between AIG and Federal Reserve Bank of New York
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to AIGs
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 10,
2008 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(80) Guarantee and Pledge Agreement, dated as of
September 22, 2008, among AIG, the Guarantors party thereto
and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 26, 2008
(File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(81) Agreement and Release, dated as of September 25,
2008, between Robert M. Sandler and AIG*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 26, 2008
(File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(82) Securities Purchase Agreement, dated as of
November 25, 2008, between AIG and United States Department
of the Treasury
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 26, 2008 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(83) Warrant to Purchase Common Stock, issued
November 25, 2008
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on November 26, 2008 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(84) Master Investment and Credit Agreement, dated as of
November 25, 2008, among Maiden Lane III LLC, the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York, AIG and the Bank of New York
Mellon
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 2, 2008 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(85) Shortfall Agreement, dated as of November 25,
2008, between Maiden Lane III LLC and AIG Financial
Products Corp.
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 2, 2008 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(86) Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of
December 12, 2008, among the Sellers party thereto, AIG
Securities Lending Corp., AIG, Maiden Lane II LLC and the
Federal Reserve Bank of New York
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 15, 2008 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(87) Amendment No. 1 to the Shortfall Agreement, dated
as of December 18, 2008
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 24, 2008 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 335
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
Location
|
|
|
|
(88) Release Agreement with Steven J. Bensinger*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to AIGs
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(89) Letter from Robert B. Willumstad to Edward M. Liddy*
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to AIGs
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended
September 30, 2008 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(90) AIG Credit Facility Trust Agreement, dated as of
January 16, 2009, among Federal Reserve Bank of New York
and Jill M. Considine, Chester B. Feldberg and Douglas L. Foshee
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to AIGs Current
Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 23, 2009 (File
No. 1-8787).
|
|
|
(91) Series C Perpetual, Convertible, Participating Preferred
Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2009, between AIG
Credit Facility Trust and AIG
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
(92) Letter Agreement, dated as of March 1, 2009,
between United States Department of the Treasury and AIG.
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
(93) Support Agreement, dated as of July 10, 2008,
between AIG and American General Finance Corporation
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
|
|
(94) Aircraft Facility Agreement, dated as of January 19, 1999,
among International Lease Finance Corporation, Halifax PLC and
the other banks listed therein
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to International
Lease Finance Corporations Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 1998 (File
No. 000-11350).
|
|
|
(95) Aircraft Facility Agreement, dated as of May 18, 2004,
among Whitney Leasing Limited, as borrower, International Lease
Finance Corporation, as guarantor and the Bank of Scotland and
the other banks listed therein
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 to International
Lease Finance Corporations Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (File
No. 001-31616).
|
|
|
(96) $2,000,000,000 Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement, dated
as of October 15, 2004, among International Lease Finance
Corporation, CitiCorp USA, Inc., as Administrative Agent, and
the other financial institutions listed therein
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to International
Lease Finance Corporations Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2004 (File
No. 001-31616).
|
|
|
(97) Amendment No. 1 to the $2,000,000,000 Five-Year Revolving
Credit Agreement dated as of October 15, 2004, among
International Lease Finance Corporation, CitiCorp USA, Inc., as
Administrative Agent, and the other financial institutions
listed therein
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to International
Lease Finance Corporations Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on October 18, 2006 (File
No. 001-31616).
|
|
|
(98) $2,000,000,000 Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement dated
as of October 14, 2005, among International Lease Finance
Corporation, CitiCorp USA, Inc. as Administrative Agent, and the
other financial institutions listed therein
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to International
Lease Finance Corporations Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on October 18, 2005 (File
No. 001-31616).
|
|
|
(99) Amendment No. 1 to the $2,000,000,000 Five-Year Revolving
Credit Agreement dated as of October 14, 2005, among
International Lease Finance Corporation, CitiCorp USA, Inc., as
Administrative Agent, and the other financial institutions
listed therein
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to International
Lease Finance Corporations Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on October 18, 2006 (File
No. 001-31616).
|
336 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
Location
|
|
|
|
(100) $2,500,000,000 Five-Year Revolving Credit Agreement, dated
as of October 13, 2006, among International Lease Finance
Corporation, CitiCorp USA, Inc., as Administrative Agent, and
the other financial institutions listed therein
|
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to International
Lease Finance Corporations Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed with the SEC on October 18, 2006 (File
No. 001-31616).
|
11
|
|
Statement re computation of per share earnings
|
|
Included in Note 15 to Consolidated Financial Statements.
|
12
|
|
Computation of Ratios of Earnings to Fixed Charges
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
13
|
|
Annual report to security holders
|
|
Not required to be filed.
|
21
|
|
Subsidiaries of Registrant
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
23
|
|
Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
24
|
|
Power of attorney
|
|
Included on the signature page hereof.
|
31
|
|
Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)
Certifications
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
32
|
|
Section 1350 Certifications
|
|
Filed herewith.
|
99
|
|
Additional exhibits
|
|
None.
|
|
|
|
* |
|
This exhibit is a management contract or a compensatory plan
or arrangement. |
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 337
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Summary
of Investments Other than Investments in Related
Parties
Schedule I
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
which shown in
|
|
At December 31, 2008
|
|
Cost*
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
the Balance Sheet
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Fixed maturities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. government and government-sponsored entities
|
|
$
|
4,471
|
|
|
$
|
4,741
|
|
|
$
|
4,741
|
|
Obligations of states, municipalities and political subdivisions
|
|
|
62,722
|
|
|
|
61,260
|
|
|
|
61,260
|
|
Non U.S. governments
|
|
|
62,982
|
|
|
|
68,313
|
|
|
|
68,313
|
|
Public utilities
|
|
|
12,819
|
|
|
|
12,769
|
|
|
|
12,769
|
|
All other corporate
|
|
|
276,556
|
|
|
|
253,207
|
|
|
|
253,207
|
|
Securities lending invested collateral, at fair value
|
|
|
3,906
|
|
|
|
3,844
|
|
|
|
3,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fixed maturities
|
|
|
423,456
|
|
|
|
404,134
|
|
|
|
404,134
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities and mutual funds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stocks:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public utilities
|
|
|
399
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
Banks, trust and insurance companies
|
|
|
1,406
|
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
|
|
1,561
|
|
Industrial, miscellaneous and all other
|
|
|
5,435
|
|
|
|
5,516
|
|
|
|
5,516
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total common stocks
|
|
|
7,240
|
|
|
|
7,511
|
|
|
|
7,511
|
|
Preferred stocks
|
|
|
1,349
|
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
|
|
1,244
|
|
Mutual funds
|
|
|
14,608
|
|
|
|
12,388
|
|
|
|
12,388
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity securities and mutual funds
|
|
|
23,197
|
|
|
|
21,143
|
|
|
|
21,143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage and other loans receivable
|
|
|
34,687
|
|
|
|
35,056
|
|
|
|
34,687
|
|
Finance receivables, net of allowance
|
|
|
30,949
|
|
|
|
28,731
|
|
|
|
30,949
|
|
Other invested assets
|
|
|
51,891
|
|
|
|
53,219
|
|
|
|
51,978
|
|
Securities purchased under agreements to resell, at contract
value
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
|
|
3,960
|
|
Short-term investments, at cost (approximates fair value)
|
|
|
46,666
|
|
|
|
46,666
|
|
|
|
46,666
|
|
Trade receivables
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
|
|
1,901
|
|
Unrealized gain on swaps, options and forward transactions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,773
|
|
|
|
13,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
609,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Original cost of equity securities and fixed maturities are
reduced by
other-than-temporary
impairment charges, and, as to fixed maturities, reduced by
repayments and adjusted for amortization of premiums or accrual
of discounts.
|
338 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Condensed
Financial Information of Registrant
Balance Sheet Parent Company Only
Schedule II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
Investments
|
|
|
16,110
|
|
|
|
14,712
|
|
Loans to subsidiaries*
|
|
|
64,283
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in consolidated subsidiaries*
|
|
|
65,724
|
|
|
|
111,650
|
|
Current and deferred income taxes
|
|
|
7,179
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due from affiliates*
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums and insurance balances receivable net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
311
|
|
Debt issuance costs including prepaid commitment asset of
$15,458 in 2008
|
|
|
15,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
4,306
|
|
|
|
9,103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
173,670
|
|
|
$
|
135,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Insurance balances payable
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
Due to affiliates*
|
|
|
26,593
|
|
|
|
3,916
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank of New York credit facility
|
|
|
40,431
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
29,321
|
|
|
|
20,397
|
|
Loans payable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
500
|
|
AIG MIP matched notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
14,464
|
|
|
|
14,274
|
|
Series AIGFP matched notes and bonds payable
|
|
|
4,143
|
|
|
|
874
|
|
Other liabilities (in 2008 includes intercompany liabilities of
$3,593)
|
|
|
6,008
|
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
120,960
|
|
|
|
40,059
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
7,370
|
|
|
|
6,878
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
72,466
|
|
|
|
1,936
|
|
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)
|
|
|
(12,368
|
)
|
|
|
89,029
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(6,328
|
)
|
|
|
4,643
|
|
Treasury stock
|
|
|
(8,450
|
)
|
|
|
(6,685
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders equity
|
|
|
52,710
|
|
|
|
95,801
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
|
$
|
173,670
|
|
|
$
|
135,860
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Eliminated in consolidation
|
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
Parent Company Only.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 339
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
(Continued)
Statement of Income (Loss) Parent Company Only
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Agency income
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Financial services income (loss)
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
531
|
|
Asset management income
|
|
|
882
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
General insurance loss
|
|
|
(1,076
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividend income from consolidated subsidiaries*
|
|
|
2,337
|
|
|
|
4,685
|
|
|
|
1,689
|
|
Non-cash dividend income from consolidated subsidiaries*
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dividend income from partially-owned companies
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Equity in undistributed net income (loss) of consolidated
subsidiaries and partially owned companies
|
|
|
(61,542
|
)
|
|
|
3,121
|
|
|
|
13,308
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(13,707
|
)
|
|
|
(1,343
|
)
|
|
|
(501
|
)
|
Other expenses, net
|
|
|
(6,306
|
)
|
|
|
(1,223
|
)
|
|
|
(870
|
)
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principles
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
(79,655
|
)
|
|
|
5,427
|
|
|
|
14,245
|
|
Income tax expense (benefit)
|
|
|
19,634
|
|
|
|
(773
|
)
|
|
|
197
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(99,289
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,200
|
|
|
$
|
14,048
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
Eliminated in consolidation.
|
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
Parent Company Only.
340 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
(Continued)
Statement
of Cash Flows Parent Company Only
Schedule II
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
$
|
(1,896
|
)
|
|
$
|
(774
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,602
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funding to establish Maiden Lane III LLC
|
|
|
(5,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of investments
|
|
|
(4,016
|
)
|
|
|
(7,649
|
)
|
|
|
(7,744
|
)
|
Sale of investments
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
|
3,052
|
|
|
|
3,314
|
|
Change in short-term investments
|
|
|
(254
|
)
|
|
|
(3,657
|
)
|
|
|
414
|
|
Contributions to subsidiaries and investments in partially owned
companies
|
|
|
(9,973
|
)
|
|
|
(755
|
)
|
|
|
(957
|
)
|
Mortgage and other loan receivables originations and
purchases*
|
|
|
(86,229
|
)
|
|
|
(2,380
|
)
|
|
|
(495
|
)
|
Payments received on mortgages and other loan receivables
|
|
|
9,956
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
Other, net
|
|
|
2,610
|
|
|
|
(1,639
|
)
|
|
|
(1,770
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(92,158
|
)
|
|
|
(12,494
|
)
|
|
|
(7,209
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Reserve Bank of New York credit facility borrowings
|
|
|
96,650
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of Federal Reserve Bank of New York credit facility
borrowings
|
|
|
(59,850
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of long-term debt
|
|
|
21,142
|
|
|
|
20,582
|
|
|
|
12,005
|
|
Repayment of long-term debt
|
|
|
(5,143
|
)
|
|
|
(1,253
|
)
|
|
|
(2,417
|
)
|
Proceeds from common stock issued
|
|
|
7,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of Series D preferred stock and
common stock warrant
|
|
|
40,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of treasury stock
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
Payments advanced to purchase shares
|
|
|
(1,000
|
)
|
|
|
(6,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends paid to shareholders
|
|
|
(1,628
|
)
|
|
|
(1,881
|
)
|
|
|
(1,638
|
)
|
Acquisition of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Other, net
|
|
|
(3,457
|
)
|
|
|
1,627
|
|
|
|
1,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
94,073
|
|
|
|
13,276
|
|
|
|
9,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in cash
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
(114
|
)
|
Cash at beginning of year
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash at end of year
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
In 2008, includes $86,045 of loans to subsidiaries. |
Supplementary disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Intercompany non-cash financing/investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Settlement of repurchase agreement with loan receivable
|
|
$
|
3,160
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Capital contributions in the form of bonds
|
|
|
3,160
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans receivable forgiven through capital contributions
|
|
|
11,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other non-cash capital contributions to subsidiaries
|
|
|
513
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
Parent Company Only.
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 341
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
(Continued)
Notes to
Condensed Financial Information of Registrant
American International Group, Inc.s (the Registrant)
investments in consolidated subsidiaries are stated at cost plus
equity in undistributed income of consolidated subsidiaries. The
accompanying condensed financial statements of the Registrant
should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial
statements and notes thereto of American International Group,
Inc. and subsidiaries included in the Registrants 2008
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
Agency operations previously conducted in New York through the
North American Division of AIU are included in the 2007 and 2006
financial statements of the Parent Company.
The Registrant includes in its statement of income (loss)
dividends from its subsidiaries and equity in undistributed
income (loss) of consolidated subsidiaries, which represents the
net income (loss) of each of its wholly-owned subsidiaries.
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform
to the current period presentation.
Long term obligations for the Parent Company include the Credit
Agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and other
loans payable. The details of all obligations and their
five-year maturity schedule are incorporated by reference from
Note 13 to Consolidated Financial Statements.
The Registrant files a consolidated federal income tax return
with certain subsidiaries and acts as an agent for the
consolidated tax group when making payments to the Internal
Revenue Service. The Registrant and its subsidiaries have
adopted, pursuant to a written agreement, a method of allocating
consolidated Federal income taxes. Amounts allocated to the
subsidiaries under the written agreement are included in Due to
Affiliates in the accompanying Condensed Balance Sheets.
Income taxes in the accompanying Condensed Balance Sheets are
comprised of the Registrants current and deferred tax
assets, the consolidated groups current income tax
receivable, deferred taxes attributable to the potential sale of
foreign and domestic businesses and a valuation allowance to
reduce the consolidated deferred tax asset to an amount more
likely than not to be realized. See Note 20 to the
Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
During the second quarter of 2008, the Registrant made certain
revisions to the American International Group, Inc. Condensed
Statement of Cash Flows, primarily relating to the effect of
reclassifying certain intercompany and securities lending
balances. Accordingly, the Registrant revised the previous
periods presented to conform to the revised presentation. There
was no effect on the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows or
ending cash balances.
The revisions and their effect on the American International
Group, Inc. Condensed Statement of Cash Flows for the years
ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally Reported
|
|
|
Revisions
|
|
|
As Revised
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
December 31, 2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(770
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(774
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(10,737
|
)
|
|
|
(1,757
|
)
|
|
|
(12,494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$
|
11,515
|
|
|
$
|
1,761
|
|
|
$
|
13,276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
$
|
(590
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,012
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2,602
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(7,643
|
)
|
|
|
434
|
|
|
|
(7,209
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$
|
8,119
|
|
|
$
|
1,578
|
|
|
$
|
9,697
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Accompanying Notes to Financial Statements
Parent Company Only.
342 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Supplementary
Insurance Information
Schedule III
At December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and for the years
then ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liability
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for Unpaid
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Claims
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Losses
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
Adjustment
|
|
|
Reserve
|
|
|
Policy
|
|
|
Premiums
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Loss
|
|
|
of Deferred
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Policy
|
|
|
Expense,
|
|
|
for
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
and Other
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Policy
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Future Policy
|
|
|
Unearned
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
Considerations
|
|
|
Investment
|
|
|
Incurred,
|
|
|
Acquisition
|
|
|
Operating
|
|
|
Premiums
|
|
Segment
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Benefits(a)
|
|
|
Premiums
|
|
|
Claims(b)
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Benefits
|
|
|
Costs
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Written
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Insurance
|
|
$
|
5,114
|
|
|
$
|
89,258
|
|
|
$
|
25,735
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
46,222
|
|
|
$
|
3,477
|
|
|
$
|
35,557
|
|
|
$
|
7,428
|
|
|
$
|
7,437
|
|
|
$
|
45,234
|
|
Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
|
40,613
|
|
|
|
142,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,118
|
|
|
|
37,295
|
|
|
|
10,106
|
|
|
|
27,594
|
|
|
|
4,972
|
|
|
|
7,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(1,361
|
)
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
45,782
|
|
|
$
|
231,592
|
|
|
$
|
25,735
|
|
|
$
|
3,118
|
|
|
$
|
83,505
|
|
|
$
|
12,222
|
|
|
$
|
63,299
|
|
|
$
|
12,400
|
|
|
$
|
15,371
|
|
|
$
|
45,234
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Insurance
|
|
$
|
5,407
|
|
|
$
|
85,500
|
|
|
$
|
27,703
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
45,682
|
|
|
$
|
6,132
|
|
|
$
|
29,982
|
|
|
$
|
8,235
|
|
|
$
|
2,965
|
|
|
$
|
47,067
|
|
Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
|
38,445
|
|
|
|
136,387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,123
|
|
|
|
33,627
|
|
|
|
22,341
|
|
|
|
36,188
|
|
|
|
3,367
|
|
|
|
5,829
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,914
|
|
|
$
|
221,887
|
|
|
$
|
27,703
|
|
|
$
|
3,123
|
|
|
$
|
79,302
|
|
|
$
|
28,619
|
|
|
$
|
66,115
|
|
|
$
|
11,602
|
|
|
$
|
8,794
|
|
|
$
|
47,067
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Insurance
|
|
$
|
4,977
|
|
|
$
|
79,999
|
|
|
$
|
26,271
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,451
|
|
|
$
|
5,696
|
|
|
$
|
28,052
|
|
|
$
|
7,866
|
|
|
$
|
2,876
|
|
|
$
|
44,866
|
|
Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
|
32,810
|
|
|
|
121,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,788
|
|
|
|
30,766
|
|
|
|
20,024
|
|
|
|
32,086
|
|
|
|
3,712
|
|
|
|
4,959
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
|
350
|
|
|
|
149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
37,857
|
|
|
$
|
201,003
|
|
|
$
|
26,271
|
|
|
$
|
2,788
|
|
|
$
|
74,213
|
|
|
$
|
26,070
|
|
|
$
|
60,287
|
|
|
$
|
11,578
|
|
|
$
|
7,835
|
|
|
$
|
44,866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Liability for unpaid claims and claims adjustment expense
with respect to the General Insurance operations are net of
discounts of $2.57 billion, $2.43 billion and
$2.26 billion at December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006,
respectively. |
|
(b) |
|
Reflected in insurance balances payable on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheet. |
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 343
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Reinsurance
Schedule IV
At December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 and for the years
then ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Percent of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ceded to
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
from Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Companies
|
|
|
Net Amount
|
|
|
to Net
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance in-force
|
|
$
|
2,377,314
|
|
|
$
|
384,538
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,993,776
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Insurance
|
|
$
|
49,422
|
|
|
$
|
11,427
|
|
|
$
|
7,239
|
|
|
$
|
45,234
|
|
|
|
16.0
|
%
|
Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
|
39,091
|
|
|
|
1,858
|
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
37,295
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total premiums
|
|
$
|
88,513
|
|
|
$
|
13,285
|
|
|
$
|
7,301
|
|
|
$
|
82,529
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance in-force
|
|
$
|
2,311,022
|
|
|
$
|
402,654
|
|
|
$
|
1,023
|
|
|
$
|
1,909,391
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Insurance
|
|
$
|
52,055
|
|
|
$
|
11,731
|
|
|
$
|
6,743
|
|
|
$
|
47,067
|
|
|
|
14.3
|
%
|
Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
|
34,555
|
|
|
|
1,778
|
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
32,807
|
*
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total premiums
|
|
$
|
86,610
|
|
|
$
|
13,509
|
|
|
$
|
6,773
|
|
|
$
|
79,874
|
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Life Insurance in-force
|
|
$
|
2,069,617
|
|
|
$
|
408,970
|
|
|
$
|
983
|
|
|
$
|
1,661,630
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premiums:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General Insurance
|
|
$
|
49,609
|
|
|
$
|
11,414
|
|
|
$
|
6,671
|
|
|
$
|
44,866
|
|
|
|
14.9
|
%
|
Life Insurance & Retirement Services
|
|
|
32,227
|
|
|
|
1,481
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
30,766
|
*
|
|
|
0.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total premiums
|
|
$
|
81,836
|
|
|
$
|
12,895
|
|
|
$
|
6,691
|
|
|
$
|
75,632
|
|
|
|
8.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Includes accident and health premiums of $8.06 billion,
$6.76 billion and $7.11 billion in 2008, 2007 and
2006, respectively. |
344 AIG 2008
Form 10-K
American International Group, Inc.,
and Subsidiaries
Valuation
and Qualifying Accounts
Schedule V
For the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance,
|
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
|
Costs and
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Balance,
|
|
|
|
of Year
|
|
|
Expenses
|
|
|
Charge offs
|
|
|
Changes(a)
|
|
|
End of Year
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for mortgage and other loans receivable
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
|
$
|
72
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
Allowance for finance receivables
|
|
|
878
|
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
|
|
(931
|
)
|
|
|
98
|
|
|
|
1,472
|
|
Allowance for premiums and insurances balances receivable
|
|
|
662
|
|
|
|
205
|
|
|
|
(283
|
)
|
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
|
578
|
|
Allowance for reinsurance assets
|
|
|
520
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
(92
|
)
|
|
|
425
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
|
|
223
|
|
|
|
20,673
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,896
|
|
Overhaul reserve(b)
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(218
|
)
|
|
|
419
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for mortgage and other loans receivable
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
77
|
|
Allowance for finance receivables
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
|
646
|
|
|
|
(632
|
)
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
878
|
|
Allowance for premiums and insurances balances receivable
|
|
|
756
|
|
|
|
114
|
|
|
|
(216
|
)
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
662
|
|
Allowance for reinsurance assets
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
|
(62
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
520
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223
|
|
Overhaul reserve(b)
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(163
|
)
|
|
|
372
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for mortgage and other loans receivable
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
(11
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
$
|
64
|
|
Allowance for finance receivables
|
|
|
670
|
|
|
|
495
|
|
|
|
(534
|
)
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
|
737
|
|
Allowance for premiums and insurances balances receivable
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
|
756
|
|
Allowance for reinsurance assets
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
147
|
|
|
|
(381
|
)
|
|
|
(229
|
)
|
|
|
536
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
|
|
Overhaul reserve(b)
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
|
264
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(146
|
)
|
|
|
245
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Includes recoveries of amounts previously charged off and
reclassifications to/from other accounts. |
|
(b) |
|
Amounts for Overhaul reserve represent reimbursements to
lessees for overhauls performed and amounts transferred to
buyers for aircraft sold and is included in Other liabilities in
the consolidated balance sheet. |
AIG 2008
Form 10-K 345