e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
Form 10-Q
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
Commission file number 1-14180
Loral Space &
Communications Inc.
600 Third
Avenue
New York, New York 10016
Telephone:
(212) 697-1105
Jurisdiction
of incorporation: Delaware
IRS
identification number:
87-0748324
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer
o
|
|
Accelerated filer
þ
|
|
Non-accelerated filer
o
|
|
Smaller reporting company
o
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant has filed all
documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12,
13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to
the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a
court. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
As of July 31, 2009, 20,313,797 shares of the
registrants voting common stock and 9,505,673 shares
of the registrants non-voting common stock were
outstanding.
LORAL
SPACE AND COMMUNICATIONS INC.
INDEX TO
QUARTERLY REPORT ON
FORM 10-Q
For the
quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
1
PART 1.
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
(In thousands, except share data)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
103,574
|
|
|
$
|
117,548
|
|
Contracts-in-process
|
|
|
199,881
|
|
|
|
213,651
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
98,669
|
|
|
|
109,755
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
33,878
|
|
|
|
54,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
436,002
|
|
|
|
495,240
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
|
198,686
|
|
|
|
188,270
|
|
Long-term receivables
|
|
|
216,774
|
|
|
|
184,701
|
|
Investments in affiliates
|
|
|
159,602
|
|
|
|
72,642
|
|
Intangible assets, net
|
|
|
25,939
|
|
|
|
31,578
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
20,607
|
|
|
|
23,436
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
1,057,610
|
|
|
$
|
995,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
106,751
|
|
|
$
|
91,052
|
|
Accrued employment costs
|
|
|
39,266
|
|
|
|
41,819
|
|
Customer advances and billings in excess of costs and profits
|
|
|
233,991
|
|
|
|
184,592
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
|
15,941
|
|
|
|
31,911
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
395,949
|
|
|
|
349,374
|
|
Borrowings under revolving credit facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
55,000
|
|
Pension and other post retirement liabilities
|
|
|
229,468
|
|
|
|
230,660
|
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
156,947
|
|
|
|
151,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
782,364
|
|
|
|
786,210
|
|
Commitments and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value, 10,000,000 shares
authorized, no shares issued and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Voting common stock, $.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares
authorized, 20,317,877 and 20,286,992 shares issued and
outstanding
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
|
203
|
|
Non-voting common stock, $.01 par value;
20,000,000 shares authorized, 9,505,673 shares issued
and outstanding
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Paid-in capital
|
|
|
1,010,859
|
|
|
|
1,007,011
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(687,455
|
)
|
|
|
(750,922
|
)
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(48,456
|
)
|
|
|
(46,730
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
|
275,246
|
|
|
|
209,657
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and equity
|
|
$
|
1,057,610
|
|
|
$
|
995,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
(In thousands, except per share
amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
271,447
|
|
|
$
|
208,061
|
|
|
$
|
483,938
|
|
|
$
|
426,598
|
|
Cost of revenues
|
|
|
254,215
|
|
|
|
184,103
|
|
|
|
451,416
|
|
|
|
391,115
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
24,927
|
|
|
|
25,562
|
|
|
|
45,697
|
|
|
|
47,897
|
|
Gain on recovery from customer bankruptcy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,140
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,140
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(7,695
|
)
|
|
|
4,536
|
|
|
|
(13,175
|
)
|
|
|
(6,274
|
)
|
Interest and investment income
|
|
|
1,925
|
|
|
|
1,952
|
|
|
|
3,578
|
|
|
|
8,282
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1,219
|
|
|
|
(305
|
)
|
|
|
(47
|
)
|
|
|
(656
|
)
|
Gain on litigation recovery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,295
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,295
|
|
Impairment of available for sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3,500
|
)
|
Other expense
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
|
(223
|
)
|
|
|
(99
|
)
|
|
|
(296
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before income taxes and equity in net income
(losses) of affiliates
|
|
|
(4,563
|
)
|
|
|
60,755
|
|
|
|
(9,743
|
)
|
|
|
55,851
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
(6,418
|
)
|
|
|
(11,643
|
)
|
|
|
(6,398
|
)
|
|
|
(13,419
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss) income before equity in net income (losses) of affiliates
|
|
|
(10,981
|
)
|
|
|
49,112
|
|
|
|
(16,141
|
)
|
|
|
42,432
|
|
Equity in net income (losses) of affiliates
|
|
|
85,276
|
|
|
|
2,838
|
|
|
|
79,608
|
|
|
|
(61,699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) attributable to Loral Space &
Communications Inc.
|
|
|
74,295
|
|
|
|
51,950
|
|
|
|
63,467
|
|
|
|
(19,267
|
)
|
Preferred dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,099
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,087
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to Loral Space &
Communications Inc. common shareholders
|
|
$
|
74,295
|
|
|
$
|
45,851
|
|
|
$
|
63,467
|
|
|
$
|
(31,354
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
2.50
|
|
|
$
|
2.27
|
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
|
$
|
(1.56
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
2.48
|
|
|
$
|
2.16
|
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
|
$
|
(1.56
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
29,753
|
|
|
|
20,169
|
|
|
|
29,727
|
|
|
|
20,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
29,904
|
|
|
|
21,614
|
|
|
|
29,803
|
|
|
|
20,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series A-1
|
|
|
Series B-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
Convertible
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Voting
|
|
|
Non-Voting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-In
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2008
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
$
|
41,873
|
|
|
|
901
|
|
|
$
|
265,777
|
|
|
|
20,293
|
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
663,127
|
|
|
$
|
(33,939
|
)
|
|
$
|
36,517
|
|
|
$
|
973,558
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19,267
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,013
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,280
|
)
|
Issuance of Series-1 preferred stock as payment for dividend
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
771
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
11,129
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,900
|
|
Restricted shares surrendered to fund withholding taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(232
|
)
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,155
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,155
|
|
Preferred stock dividends
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,087
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12,087
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2008
|
|
|
145
|
|
|
$
|
42,644
|
|
|
|
938
|
|
|
$
|
276,906
|
|
|
|
20,296
|
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
667,050
|
|
|
$
|
(65,293
|
)
|
|
$
|
34,504
|
|
|
$
|
956,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, January 1, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
20,287
|
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
|
|
9,506
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
1,007,011
|
|
|
$
|
(750,922
|
)
|
|
$
|
(46,730
|
)
|
|
$
|
209,657
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,467
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,726
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
61,741
|
|
Exercise of stock options
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Restricted shares surrendered to fund withholding taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(802
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(802
|
)
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,615
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30, 2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
20,318
|
|
|
$
|
203
|
|
|
|
9,506
|
|
|
$
|
95
|
|
|
$
|
1,010,859
|
|
|
$
|
(687,455
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48,456
|
)
|
|
$
|
275,246
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
(In thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
63,467
|
|
|
$
|
(19,267
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by (used in) operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash operating items (Note 3)
|
|
|
(60,547
|
)
|
|
|
25,541
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contracts-in-process
|
|
|
2,409
|
|
|
|
(82,213
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
11,086
|
|
|
|
(8,188
|
)
|
Long-term receivables
|
|
|
(2,733
|
)
|
|
|
19,140
|
|
Other current assets and other assets
|
|
|
3,146
|
|
|
|
(3,142
|
)
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
14,846
|
|
|
|
(6,462
|
)
|
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities
|
|
|
(17,944
|
)
|
|
|
(20,343
|
)
|
Customer advances
|
|
|
32,554
|
|
|
|
(29,087
|
)
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
16,860
|
|
|
|
(24,815
|
)
|
Pension and other postretirement liabilities
|
|
|
(1,192
|
)
|
|
|
(6,127
|
)
|
Long-term liabilities
|
|
|
5,288
|
|
|
|
(1,856
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
|
67,240
|
|
|
|
(156,819
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
|
|
(21,778
|
)
|
|
|
(23,095
|
)
|
Decrease in restricted cash
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
622
|
|
Proceeds from the sale of short-term investments and
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
162
|
|
Investment in affiliates
|
|
|
(4,480
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of short-term investments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
(26,249
|
)
|
|
|
(22,811
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of borrowings under SS/L revolving credit facility
|
|
|
(55,000
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities
|
|
|
(54,965
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(13,974
|
)
|
|
|
(179,630
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of period
|
|
|
117,548
|
|
|
|
314,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents end of period
|
|
$
|
103,574
|
|
|
$
|
135,064
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
(Unaudited)
|
|
1.
|
Organization
and Principal Business
|
Loral Space & Communications Inc. (Loral),
together with its subsidiaries is a leading satellite
communications company engaged in satellite manufacturing with
investments in satellite-based communications services. Loral, a
Delaware corporation, was formed on June 24, 2005, to
succeed to the business conducted by its predecessor registrant,
Loral Space & Communications Ltd. (Old
Loral), which emerged from chapter 11 of the federal
bankruptcy laws on November 21, 2005 (the Effective
Date) pursuant to the terms of the fourth amended joint
plan of reorganization, as modified (the Plan of
Reorganization).
The terms Loral, the Company,
we, our and us when used in
these financial statements with respect to the period prior to
the Effective Date, are references to Old Loral, and when used
with respect to the period commencing on and after the Effective
Date, are references to Loral. These references include the
subsidiaries of Old Loral or Loral, as the case may be, unless
otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires.
Loral has two segments (see Note 16):
Satellite Manufacturing: Our subsidiary, Space
Systems/Loral, Inc. (SS/L), designs and manufactures
satellites, space systems and space system components for
commercial and government customers whose applications include
fixed satellite services (FSS),
direct-to-home
(DTH) broadcasting, mobile satellite services
(MSS), broadband data distribution, wireless
telephony, digital radio, digital mobile broadcasting, military
communications, weather monitoring and air traffic management.
Satellite Services: Loral participates in
satellite services operations principally through its investment
in Telesat Holdings Inc. (Telesat), a global
provider of fixed satellite services. Telesats satellite
fleet operates in geosynchronous earth orbit approximately
22,000 miles above the equator. In this orbit, satellites
remain in a fixed position relative to points on the
earths surface and provide reliable, high-bandwidth
services anywhere in their coverage areas, serving as the
backbone for many forms of telecommunications.
At June 30, 2009, Telesat had 12 in-orbit satellites
(comprised of 11 owned satellites and one leased satellite,
Telstar 10). Nimiq 3, a leased satellite, was removed from
commercial service on June 1, 2009. In July, 2009, Telesat
terminated its leasehold interest on Telstar 10. Telesat
currently has two additional satellites under construction:
Nimiq 5, which Telesat anticipates will be operational in late
2009, and Telstar 14R/Estrela do Sul 2, which Telesat
anticipates will be operational in the second half of 2011.
Telesat has contracted for the sale of all of the capacity on
Nimiq 5 to Bell TV for 15 years or such later date as the
customer may request. Telesat provides video distribution and
DTH video, as well as
end-to-end
communications services using both satellite and hybrid
satellite-ground networks.
Loral holds a 64% economic interest and a
331/3%
voting interest in Telesat. We use the equity method of
accounting for our investment in Telesat.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements have been prepared pursuant to the rules of the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and, in our
opinion, include all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring
accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of results of
operations, financial position and cash flows as of the balance
sheet dates presented and for the periods presented. Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual
financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States
(U.S. GAAP) have been condensed or omitted
pursuant to SEC rules. We believe that the disclosures made are
adequate to keep the information presented from being
misleading. The results of operations for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative
of the results to be expected for the full year.
6
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The December 31, 2008 balance sheet has been derived from
the audited consolidated financial statements at that date.
These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read
in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial
statements included in our latest Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC.
As noted above, we emerged from bankruptcy on November 21,
2005 and pursuant to Statement of Position
No. 90-7,
Financial Reporting of Entities in Reorganization Under the
Bankruptcy Code
(SOP 90-7),
we adopted fresh-start accounting as of October 1, 2005 and
determined the fair value of our assets and liabilities. Upon
emergence, our reorganization equity value was allocated to our
assets and liabilities, which were stated at fair value in
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) No. 141, Business Combinations
(SFAS 141). In addition, our accumulated
deficit was eliminated, and our new equity was recorded in
accordance with distributions pursuant to the Plan of
Reorganization.
Investments in Telesat and XTAR, L.L.C. (XTAR) are
accounted for using the equity method of accounting. Income and
losses of affiliates are recorded based on our beneficial
interest. Intercompany profit arising from transactions with
affiliates is eliminated to the extent of our beneficial
interest. Equity in losses of affiliates is not recognized after
the carrying value of an investment, including advances and
loans, has been reduced to zero, unless guarantees or other
funding obligations exist. We capitalize interest cost on our
investments, until such entities commence commercial operations.
Use of
Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with
U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the amounts of
revenues and expenses reported for the period. Actual results
could differ from estimates.
Most of our satellite manufacturing revenue is associated with
long-term contracts which require significant estimates. These
estimates include forecasts of costs and schedules, estimating
contract revenue related to contract performance (including
orbital incentives) and the potential for component obsolescence
in connection with long-term procurements. Significant estimates
also include the estimated useful lives of our plant and
equipment, and finite lived intangible assets, the fair value of
indefinite lived intangible assets, the fair value of stock
based compensation, the realization of deferred tax assets, the
fair value of and gains or losses on derivative instruments and
our pension liabilities.
Concentration
of Credit Risk
Financial instruments which potentially subject us to
concentrations of credit risk consist principally of cash and
cash equivalents, foreign exchange contracts,
contracts-in-process
and long-term receivables. Our cash and cash equivalents are
maintained with high-credit-quality financial institutions.
Historically, our customers have been primarily large
multinational corporations and U.S. and foreign governments
for which the creditworthiness was generally substantial. In
recent years, we have added commercial customers who are highly
leveraged, as well as those in the development stage which are
partially funded. Management believes that its credit
evaluation, approval and monitoring processes combined with
contractual billing arrangements provide for effective
management of potential credit risks with regard to our current
customer base. However, the global financial markets have been
adversely impacted by the current market environment that
includes illiquidity, market volatility, widening credit
spreads, changes in interest rates, and currency exchange
fluctuations. These credit and financial market conditions may
have a negative impact on certain of our customers and could
negatively impact the ability of such customers to pay amounts
owed or to enter into future contracts with us.
7
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Fair
Value Measurements
Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Financial
Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements
(SFAS 157). SFAS 157 defines fair
value as the price that would be received for an asset or the
exit price that would be paid to transfer a liability in the
principal or most advantageous market in an orderly transaction
between market participants. SFAS 157 establishes a fair
value hierarchy that gives the highest priority to observable
inputs and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. The three
levels of the fair value hierarchy defined by SFAS 157 are
described below.
Level 1: Inputs represent a fair value
that is derived from unadjusted quoted prices for identical
assets or liabilities traded in active markets at the
measurement date.
Level 2: Inputs represent a fair value
that is derived from quoted prices for similar instruments in
active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar
instruments in markets that are not active, model-based
valuation techniques for which all significant assumptions are
observable in the market or can be corroborated by observable
market data for substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities, and pricing inputs, other than quoted prices in
active markets included in Level 1, which are either
directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.
Level 3: Inputs are generally
unobservable and typically reflect managements estimates
of assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the
asset or liability. The fair values are therefore determined
using model-based techniques that include option pricing models,
discounted cash flow models, and similar techniques.
The provisions of SFAS 157 are applicable to all of the
Companys assets and liabilities that are measured and
recorded at fair value.
Assets
and liabilities measured at Fair Value on Recurring
Basis
The following table presents our assets and liabilities measured
at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
$
|
1,033
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Derivatives, net
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,514
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The Company does not have any non-financial assets and
non-financial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at
fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2009.
Assets
and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-recurring
Basis
We measure equity method investments at fair value when they are
impaired. We had no equity-method investments measured at fair
value at June 30, 2009.
In accordance with the provisions of APB No. 18, The
Equity Method of Accounting for Investments in Common Stock,
we review the carrying values of our investments when events
and circumstances warrant and consider all available evidence in
evaluating when declines in fair value are other than temporary.
The fair values of our investments are determined based on
valuation techniques using the best information available, and
may include quoted market prices, market comparables, and
discounted cash flow projections. An impairment charge would be
recorded when the cost of the investment, or its previous fair
value resulting from its cost write down, exceeds its current
fair value and is determined to be other than temporary.
8
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Subsequent
Events
In preparing these condensed consolidated financial statements,
we have evaluated events and transactions for potential
recognition or disclosure through the issuance of the condensed
consolidated financial statements.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
SFAS 141(R)
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141
(revised 2007), Business Combinations
(SFAS 141(R)). SFAS 141(R) broadens
the guidance of SFAS 141, extending its applicability to
all transactions and other events in which one entity obtains
control over one or more other businesses. It broadens the fair
value measurement and recognition of assets acquired,
liabilities assumed, and interests transferred as a result of
business combinations. SFAS 141(R) expands on required
disclosures to improve the statement users abilities to
evaluate the nature and financial effects of business
combinations. SFAS 141(R) requires the acquirer to
recognize an adjustment to income tax expense for changes in the
valuation allowance for acquired deferred tax assets and
FIN 48 liabilities. SFAS 141(R) was effective for the
Company on January 1, 2009. The adoption of
SFAS 141(R) had the effect of decreasing our income tax
provision for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
by approximately $3.8 million and $0.7 million,
respectively.
FSP
FAS 142-3
In April 2008, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 142-3,
Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets
(FSP
FAS 142-3).
FSP
FAS 142-3
amends the factors that should be considered in developing
renewal or extension assumptions used to determine the useful
life of a recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142. The
intent of FSP
FAS 142-3
is to improve the consistency between the useful life of a
recognized intangible asset under SFAS 142 and the period
of expected cash flows used to measure the fair value of the
asset under SFAS 141(R) and other applicable accounting
literature. FSP
FAS 142-3
was effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. The
adoption of FSP
FAS 142-3
did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
SFAS 160
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160,
Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51
(SFAS 160). SFAS 160 requires that a
non-controlling interest in a subsidiary be reported as equity
and the amount of consolidated net income specifically
attributable to the non-controlling interest be identified in
the consolidated financial statements. It also calls for
consistency in the manner of reporting changes in the
parents ownership interest and requires fair value
measurement of any non-controlling equity investment retained in
a deconsolidation. SFAS 160 was effective for the Company
on January 1, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 160 did not
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
SFAS 161
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161,
Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 133 (SFAS 161). SFAS 161
amends SFAS 133 and SFAS 107, Disclosure about Fair
Value of Financial Instruments by requiring increased
qualitative, quantitative and credit-risk disclosures about an
entitys derivative instruments and hedging activities but
does not change SFAS 133s scope or accounting.
SFAS 161 was effective for the Company on January 1,
2009. See Note 6 for the disclosures required by
SFAS 161.
9
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
SFAS 165
In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165,
Subsequent Events (SFAS 165).
SFAS 165 establishes general standards of accounting and
disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but
before financial statements are issued or available to be
issued. SFAS 165 requires the disclosure of the date
through which subsequent events have been evaluated and whether
such date represents the date the financial statements were
issued or were available to be issued. SFAS 165 is
effective for the Company on June 30, 2009. The adoption of
SFAS 165 did not have a material impact on our consolidated
financial statements.
SFAS 167
In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167,
Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)
(SFAS 167). SFAS 167 modifies the
approach for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity (VIE) by amending Interpretation
46(R), Consolidation of Variable Interest
Entities an interpretation of ARB No. 51.
Under SFAS 167, an enterprise is required to make a
qualitative assessment whether it has (1) the power to
direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact
the entitys economic performance and (2) the
obligation to absorb losses of the VIE or the right to receive
benefits from the VIE that could potentially be significant to
the VIE. If an enterprise has both of these characteristics, the
enterprise is considered the primary beneficiary and must
consolidate the VIE. SFAS 167 is effective for the Company
on January 1, 2010. The adoption of SFAS 167 is not
expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
FSP
FAS 132(R)-1
In December 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS 132(R)-1,
Employers Disclosure about Postretirement Benefit Plan
Assets (FSP FAS 132(R)-1). FSP
FAS 132(R)-1 amends SFAS 132 Employers
Disclosure about Postretirement Benefits, to provide
guidance on an employers disclosures about plan assets of
a defined benefit pension or other retirement plan. FSP
FAS 132(R)-1 was effective for the Company on
January 1, 2009. As required by FSP FAS 132(R)-1, the
Company will provide the required additional disclosures in our
annual financial statements for the year ending
December 31, 2009.
EITF
08-6
In November 2008, the FASB ratified the Emerging Issues Task
Force (EITF) consensus on Issue
No. 08-6,
Equity Method Investment Accounting
Considerations
(EITF 08-6)
which addresses certain effects of SFAS Nos. 141(R) and 160
on an entitys accounting for equity-method investments.
The consensus indicates, among other things, that transaction
costs for an investment should be included in the cost of the
equity-method investment (and not expensed) and shares
subsequently issued by the equity-method investee that reduce
the investors ownership percentage should be accounted for
as if the investor had sold a proportionate share of its
investment, with gains or losses recorded through earnings.
EITF 08-6
is effective for transactions occurring after December 31,
2008. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material
impact on our consolidated financial statements.
FSP
FAS 107-1
and APB
28-1
In April 2009, the FASB issued FSP
FAS 107-1
and Accounting Principles Board (APB)
28-1,
Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial
Instruments. The FSP amends SFAS No. 107,
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to
require an entity to provide disclosures about fair value of
financial instruments in interim financial information (see
Note 6 for these disclosures).
10
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
3.
|
Additional
Cash Flow Information
|
The following represents non-cash activities and supplemental
information to the condensed consolidated statements of cash
flows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Non-cash operating items:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net (income) losses of affiliates
|
|
$
|
(79,608
|
)
|
|
$
|
61,699
|
|
Deferred taxes
|
|
|
(655
|
)
|
|
|
797
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
19,262
|
|
|
|
16,374
|
|
Stock based compensation
|
|
|
4,615
|
|
|
|
4,155
|
|
Warranty expense accruals (reversals)
|
|
|
(185
|
)
|
|
|
1,187
|
|
Amortization of prior service credits and net actuarial gain
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
(1,658
|
)
|
Gain on disposition of
available-for-sale
securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(162
|
)
|
Unrealized loss on non-qualified pension plan assets
|
|
|
(307
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Gain on litigation recovery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58,295
|
)
|
Non-cash net interest (income) expense
|
|
|
(2,994
|
)
|
|
|
429
|
|
(Gain) loss on foreign currency transactions and contracts
|
|
|
(572
|
)
|
|
|
291
|
|
Amortization of fair value adjustments related to orbital
incentives
|
|
|
(289
|
)
|
|
|
(2,839
|
)
|
Loss on disposition of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63
|
|
Impairment of available for sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,500
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net non-cash operating items
|
|
$
|
(60,547
|
)
|
|
$
|
25,541
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale securities received in connection with the
sale of Globalstar do Brazil
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures incurred not yet paid
|
|
$
|
2,559
|
|
|
$
|
5,832
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of Loral Series-1 Preferred Stock as payment for
dividend
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
11,900
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued dividends on
Series A-1
and
Series B-1
preferred stock
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
1,379
|
|
|
$
|
773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax (refunds) payments
|
|
$
|
(15,178
|
)
|
|
$
|
34,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company
had $5.7 million of restricted cash of which
$0.7 million is in other current assets and
$5.0 million is in other assets.
11
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
4.
|
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
|
The components of comprehensive income (loss) are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
74,295
|
|
|
$
|
51,950
|
|
Amortization of prior service credits and net actuarial gains,
net of taxes of $335 in 2008
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
|
(494
|
)
|
Proportionate share of Telesat Holdco other comprehensive income
|
|
|
2,844
|
|
|
|
673
|
|
Unrealized loss on foreign currency hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on foreign currency hedges
|
|
|
(5,220
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains included in net
income
|
|
|
(4,300
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized loss
|
|
|
(9,520
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on
available-for-sale
securities, net of taxes of $1,631 in 2008
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
(2,401
|
)
|
Less: reclassification adjustment for losses included in net
income, net of taxes of $1,369
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,041
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain (loss)
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
|
(360
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
68,400
|
|
|
$
|
51,769
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
63,467
|
|
|
$
|
(19,267
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service credits and net actuarial gains,
net of taxes of $670 in 2008
|
|
|
186
|
|
|
|
(988
|
)
|
Cumulative translation adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(498
|
)
|
Proportionate share of Telesat Holdco other comprehensive income
|
|
|
2,844
|
|
|
|
(367
|
)
|
Unrealized gain on foreign currency hedges:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain on foreign currency hedges
|
|
|
1,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: reclassification adjustment for gains included in net
income
|
|
|
(7,306
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized loss
|
|
|
(5,592
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain (loss) on
available-for-sale
securities, net of taxes of $1,303 in 2008
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
|
(2,159
|
)
|
Less: reclassification adjustment for losses included in net
income, net of taxes $1,339
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net unrealized gain (loss)
|
|
|
836
|
|
|
|
(160
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
$
|
61,741
|
|
|
$
|
(21,280
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
5.
|
Contracts-in-Process
and Inventories
|
Contracts-in-process
and inventories are comprised of the following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Contracts-in-Process:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amounts billed (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $923)
|
|
$
|
113,749
|
|
|
$
|
122,455
|
|
Unbilled receivables
|
|
|
86,132
|
|
|
|
91,196
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
199,881
|
|
|
$
|
213,651
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories-gross
|
|
$
|
125,792
|
|
|
$
|
136,955
|
|
Allowance for obsolescence
|
|
|
(27,123
|
)
|
|
|
(27,200
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
98,669
|
|
|
$
|
109,755
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unbilled amounts include recoverable costs and accrued profit on
progress completed, which have not been billed. Such amounts are
billed in accordance with the contract terms, typically upon
shipment of the product, achievement of contractual milestones,
or completion of the contract and, at such time, are
reclassified to billed receivables. Fresh-start fair value
adjustments relating to
contracts-in-process
are amortized on a percentage of completion basis as performance
under the related contract is completed.
|
|
6.
|
Financial
Instruments, Derivatives and Hedging Transactions
|
Financial
Instruments
The carrying amount of cash equivalents and restricted cash
approximates fair value because of the short maturity of those
instruments. The fair value of short-term investments,
investments in
available-for-sale
securities and supplemental retirement plan assets is based on
market quotations. The fair value of derivatives is based on the
income approach, using observable Level II market
expectations at the measurement date and standard valuation
techniques to discount future amounts to a single present value.
Foreign
Currency
We, in the normal course of business, are subject to the risks
associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
To limit this foreign exchange rate exposure, the Company seeks
to denominate its contracts in U.S. dollars. If we are
unable to enter into a contract in U.S. dollars, we review
our foreign exchange exposure and, where appropriate,
derivatives are used to minimize the risk of foreign exchange
rate fluctuations to operating results and cash flows. We do not
use derivative instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
As of June 30, 2009, SS/L had the following amounts
denominated in Japanese Yen and EUROs (which have been
translated into U.S. dollars based on the June 30,
2009 exchange rates) that were unhedged:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency
|
|
|
U.S.$
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Future revenues Japanese Yen
|
|
¥
|
157,534
|
|
|
$
|
1,649
|
|
Future expenditures Japanese Yen
|
|
¥
|
3,678,370
|
|
|
$
|
38,497
|
|
Customer advances Japanese Yen
|
|
¥
|
1,715
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
Future expenditures EUROs
|
|
|
4,695
|
|
|
$
|
6,596
|
|
13
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Derivatives
and Hedging Transactions
All derivative instruments are recorded at fair value as either
assets or liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance
sheets. Each derivative instrument is generally designated and
accounted for under SFAS No. 133, Accounting for
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities
(SFAS 133) as either a hedge of a
recognized asset or a liability (fair value hedge)
or a hedge of a forecasted transaction (cash flow
hedge). Certain of these derivatives are not designated as
hedging instruments under SFAS 133 and are used as
economic hedges to manage certain risks in our
business.
As a result of the use of derivative instruments, the Company is
exposed to the risk that counterparties to derivative contracts
will fail to meet their contractual obligations. The Company
does not hold collateral or other security from its
counterparties supporting its derivative instruments. In
addition, there are no netting arrangements in place with the
counterparties. To mitigate the counterparty credit risk, the
company has a policy of only entering into contracts with
carefully selected major financial institutions based upon their
credit ratings and other factors.
The aggregate fair value of derivative instruments in net asset
positions as of June 30, 2009 was $8.5 million. This
amount represents the maximum exposure to loss at the reporting
date as a result of the potential failure of the counterparties
to perform as contracted.
Cash Flow
Hedges
The Company enters into long-term construction contracts with
customers and vendors, some of which are denominated in foreign
currencies. Hedges of expected foreign currency denominated
contract revenues and related purchases are designated as cash
flow hedges and evaluated for effectiveness at least quarterly.
Effectiveness is tested using regression analysis. The effective
portion of the gain or loss on a cash flow hedge is recorded as
a component of other comprehensive income (OCI) and
reclassified to income in the same period or periods in which
the hedged transaction affects income. The ineffective portion
of a cash flow hedge gain or loss is included in income.
On July 9, 2008, SS/L was awarded a satellite contract
denominated in EUROs and entered into a series of foreign
exchange forward contracts with maturities through 2011 to hedge
associated foreign currency exchange risk because our costs are
denominated principally in U.S. dollars. These foreign
exchange forward contracts have been designated as cash flow
hedges of future Euro denominated receivables.
The maturity of foreign currency exchange contracts held as of
June 30, 2009 is consistent with the contractual or
expected timing of the transactions being hedged, principally
receipt of customer payments under long-term contracts. These
foreign exchange contracts mature as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Sell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
|
Euro
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
Market
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
31,640
|
|
|
$
|
48,148
|
|
|
$
|
44,457
|
|
2010
|
|
|
19,210
|
|
|
|
29,389
|
|
|
|
27,039
|
|
2011
|
|
|
23,493
|
|
|
|
35,663
|
|
|
|
33,190
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74,343
|
|
|
$
|
113,200
|
|
|
$
|
104,686
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Balance
Sheet Classification
The following summarizes the fair values and location in our
condensed consolidated balance sheet of all derivatives held by
the Company as of June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset Derivatives
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments under
SFAS 133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
5,456
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
2,796
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,252
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments under
SFAS 133
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
Other assets
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Derivatives
|
|
|
|
|
8,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flow
Hedge Gains (Losses) Recognition
The following summarizes the gains (losses) recognized in the
condensed consolidated statement of operations and accumulated
other comprehensive income for all derivatives for the six
months ended June 30, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount of Gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss on Derivative
|
|
|
|
in OCI on
|
|
|
Gain Reclassified from Accumulated
|
|
|
Ineffectiveness and
|
|
Derivatives in SFAS 133 Cash Flow
|
|
Derivative
|
|
|
OCI into Income (Effective Portion)
|
|
|
amounts excluded from Effectiveness Testing
|
|
Hedging Relationships
|
|
(Effective Portion)
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
1,782
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
7,306
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
(1,243
|
)
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
$
|
(68
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income
|
|
$
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain
|
|
|
|
Recognized in Income
|
|
Cash Flow Derivatives Not Designated as
|
|
on Derivative
|
|
Hedging Instruments under SFAS 133
|
|
Location
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Foreign exchange contracts
|
|
|
Revenue
|
|
|
$
|
430
|
|
We estimate that $8.9 million of net gains from derivative
instruments included in accumulated other comprehensive income
will be reclassified into earnings within the next
12 months.
15
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
7.
|
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Land and land improvements
|
|
$
|
26,852
|
|
|
$
|
26,913
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
67,711
|
|
|
|
59,038
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
11,086
|
|
|
|
10,870
|
|
Equipment, furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
143,659
|
|
|
|
133,916
|
|
Satellite capacity under construction (see Note 17)
|
|
|
18,634
|
|
|
|
10,478
|
|
Other construction in progress
|
|
|
17,757
|
|
|
|
21,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
285,699
|
|
|
|
263,078
|
|
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(87,013
|
)
|
|
|
(74,808
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
198,686
|
|
|
$
|
188,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization expense for property, plant and
equipment was $6.4 million and $5.8 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively and
$12.2 million and $11.0 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
|
|
8.
|
Investments
in Affiliates
|
Investments in affiliates consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Telesat Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
81,136
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
XTAR, LLC
|
|
|
76,343
|
|
|
|
70,547
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,123
|
|
|
|
2,095
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
159,602
|
|
|
$
|
72,642
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in net income (losses) of affiliates consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Telesat Holdings Inc.
|
|
$
|
80,583
|
|
|
$
|
6,959
|
|
|
$
|
78,292
|
|
|
$
|
(53,343
|
)
|
XTAR, LLC
|
|
|
4,693
|
|
|
|
(4,121
|
)
|
|
|
1,316
|
|
|
|
(8,356
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
85,276
|
|
|
$
|
2,838
|
|
|
$
|
79,608
|
|
|
$
|
(61,699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The condensed consolidated statements of operations reflect the
effects of the following amounts related to transactions with or
investments in affiliates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
16,595
|
|
|
$
|
29,085
|
|
|
$
|
40,843
|
|
|
$
|
48,434
|
|
Elimination of Lorals proportionate share of losses
(profits) relating to affiliate transactions
|
|
|
2,055
|
|
|
|
(2,625
|
)
|
|
|
(243
|
)
|
|
|
(3,814
|
)
|
(Losses) profits relating to affiliate transactions not
eliminated
|
|
|
(1,143
|
)
|
|
|
1,471
|
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
|
2,140
|
|
We use the equity method of accounting for our investment in
Telesat because we own
331/3%
of the voting stock and do not exercise control via other means.
Lorals equity in net income or loss of Telesat is based on
our proportionate share of its results in accordance with
U.S. GAAP and in U.S. dollars. Our proportionate share
of Telesats net income or loss is based on our 64%
economic interest as our holdings consist of common stock and
non-voting participating preferred shares that have all the
rights of common stock with respect to dividends, return of
capital and surplus distributions but have no voting rights.
The contribution of Loral Skynet to Telesat in 2007 was recorded
by Loral at the historical book value of our retained interest
combined with the gain recognized on the contribution. However,
the contribution was recorded by Telesat at fair value.
Accordingly, the amortization of fair value adjustments
applicable to the Loral Skynet assets and liabilities have been
proportionately eliminated in determining our share of the
income or losses of Telesat. Our equity in the net income or
loss of Telesat also reflects the elimination of our profit, to
the extent of our economic interest, on satellites we are
constructing for them.
As of December 31, 2008 our investment in Telesat had been
reduced to zero as a result of recording our proportionate
interest in Telesats losses. Equity in losses of
affiliates, other than the elimination of our profit on
transactions with such affiliates, is not recognized after the
carrying value of an investment, including advances and loans,
has been reduced to zero, unless guarantees or other funding
obligations exist. During the year ended December 31, 2008,
the Company recognized $6.9 million of equity in losses of
Telesat that due to an asset basis difference should have been
recognized during the quarter ended March 31, 2009. The
Company does not believe such amount is material to the
consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2008, or the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009.
Equity in net income (losses) of affiliates for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009 includes equity in net
losses of Telesat which were not recognized during the year
ended December 31, 2008 and the three months ended
March 31, 2009 as the carrying value of our investment in
Telesat had been reduced to zero during 2008.
17
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Telesat
The following table presents summary financial data for Telesat
in accordance with U.S. GAAP:
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
172,150
|
|
|
$
|
172,383
|
|
|
$
|
337,397
|
|
|
$
|
338,887
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(52,870
|
)
|
|
|
(66,746
|
)
|
|
|
(103,204
|
)
|
|
|
(133,863
|
)
|
Depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(55,604
|
)
|
|
|
(56,757
|
)
|
|
|
(106,122
|
)
|
|
|
(115,221
|
)
|
Operating income
|
|
|
63,676
|
|
|
|
48,880
|
|
|
|
128,071
|
|
|
|
89,803
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(54,410
|
)
|
|
|
(53,281
|
)
|
|
|
(108,546
|
)
|
|
|
(115,484
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
141,089
|
|
|
|
39,789
|
|
|
|
106,635
|
|
|
|
(48,524
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
(8,400
|
)
|
|
|
(20,346
|
)
|
|
|
(15,423
|
)
|
|
|
(3,327
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
141,954
|
|
|
|
15,042
|
|
|
|
110,736
|
|
|
|
(77,532
|
)
|
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
190,395
|
|
|
$
|
179,769
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
4,421,874
|
|
|
|
4,273,162
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
143,054
|
|
|
|
171,423
|
|
Long-term debt, including current portion
|
|
|
2,883,546
|
|
|
|
2,901,620
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
3,767,728
|
|
|
|
3,760,164
|
|
Redeemable preferred stock
|
|
|
121,685
|
|
|
|
116,044
|
|
Shareholders equity
|
|
|
532,461
|
|
|
|
396,954
|
|
Other income (expense) included foreign exchange gains of
$237 million and $21 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively, foreign
exchange gains (losses) of $156 million and
$(102) million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively, and (losses) gains on financial
instruments of $(93) million and $18 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively and
$(47) million and $50 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
XTAR
We own 56% of XTAR, a joint venture between us and Hisdesat
Servicios Estrategicos, S.A. (Hisdesat) of Spain. We
account for our investment in XTAR under the equity method of
accounting because we do not control certain of its significant
operating decisions.
XTAR owns and operates an X-band satellite, XTAR-EUR, located at
29o E.L.,
which is designed to provide X-band communications services
exclusively to United States, Spanish and allied government
users throughout the satellites coverage area, including
Europe, the Middle East and Asia. XTAR also leases 7.2
72 MHz X-band transponders on the Spainsat satellite
located at
30o W.L.,
owned by Hisdesat. These transponders, designated as
XTAR-LANT,
provide capacity to XTAR for additional X-band services and
greater coverage and flexibility.
18
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
In January 2005, Hisdesat provided XTAR with a convertible loan
in the amount of $10.8 million due 2011, for which Hisdesat
received enhanced governance rights in XTAR. If Hisdesat were to
convert the loan into XTAR equity, our equity interest in XTAR
would be reduced to 51%.
XTARs lease obligation to Hisdesat for the
XTAR-LANT
transponders is $23.4 million in 2009, with increases
thereafter to a maximum of $28 million per year through the
end of the useful life of the satellite. Under this lease
agreement, Hisdesat may also be entitled under certain
circumstances to a share of the revenues generated on the
XTAR-LANT
transponders. Interest on XTARs outstanding lease
obligations to Hisdesat is paid through the issuance of a class
of non-voting membership interests in XTAR, which enjoy priority
rights with respect to dividends and distributions over the
ordinary membership interests currently held by us and Hisdesat.
In March 2009, XTAR entered into an agreement with Hisdesat
whereby the past due balance on
XTAR-LANT
transponders of $32.3 million as of December 31, 2008,
together with a deferral of $6.7 million in payments due in
2009, will be payable to Hisdesat over 12 years through
annual payments of $5 million (the Catch Up
Payments). XTAR has a right to prepay, at any time, all
unpaid Catch Up Payments discounted at 9%. XTAR has also agreed
that XTARs excess cash balance (as defined) will be
applied towards making limited payments on future lease
obligations, as well as payments of other amounts owed to
Hisdesat, Telesat and Loral in respect of services provided by
them to XTAR.
XTAR-EUR was launched on Arianespace, S.A.s Ariane ECA
launch vehicle in 2005. The price for this launch had two
components the first, consisting of a
$15.8 million 10% interest
paid-in-kind
loan provided by Arianespace, was repaid in full by XTAR on
July 6, 2007. The second component of the launch price
consisted of a revenue-based fee to be paid to Arianespace over
XTAR-EURs 15 year in-orbit operations. This fee, also
referred to as an incentive fee, equaled 3.5% of XTARs
annual operating revenues, subject to a maximum threshold. On
February 29, 2008, XTAR paid Arianespace $1.5 million
representing the incentive fee through December 31, 2007.
On January 27, 2009, Arianespace agreed to eliminate the
incentive portion of the Launch Services Agreement in exchange
for $8.0 million payable in three installments. As of
June 30, 2009, XTAR paid all three installments and has no
further obligations under the Launch Services Agreement. As a
result, XTARs net income for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 included a gain of $11.7 million
related to the extinguishment of this liability.
To enable XTAR to make these settlement payments to Arianespace,
XTAR issued a capital call to its LLC members. In response to
the capital call Loral increased its investment in XTAR by
approximately $4.5 million in the first quarter of 2009,
representing Lorals 56% share of the $8 million
capital call.
The following table presents summary financial data for XTAR:
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
8,230
|
|
|
$
|
4,720
|
|
|
$
|
14,591
|
|
|
$
|
9,448
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(8,684
|
)
|
|
|
(8,667
|
)
|
|
|
(17,145
|
)
|
|
|
(17,252
|
)
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(2,404
|
)
|
|
|
(2,407
|
)
|
|
|
(4,809
|
)
|
|
|
(4,841
|
)
|
Operating loss
|
|
|
(2,858
|
)
|
|
|
(6,354
|
)
|
|
|
(7,363
|
)
|
|
|
(12,645
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
8,390
|
|
|
|
(7,407
|
)
|
|
|
2,374
|
|
|
|
(14,962
|
)
|
19
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
$
|
9,525
|
|
|
$
|
9,107
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
111,046
|
|
|
|
115,437
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
43,967
|
|
|
|
41,314
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
64,621
|
|
|
|
79,386
|
|
Members equity
|
|
|
46,425
|
|
|
|
36,051
|
|
Other
On December 21, 2007, Loral and certain of its subsidiaries
and DASA Globalstar LLC entered into an agreement to sell their
respective interests in Globalstar do Brasil S.A.
(GdB), the Globalstar Brazilian service provider, to
Globalstar Inc. Closing of the transaction occurred on
March 25, 2008. Pursuant to the sale agreement, Loral
received 883,393 shares of common stock of Globalstar Inc.
in consideration for the sale of its interest. The shares have
been registered under the Securities Act of 1933 and may be sold
by Loral without restriction. In addition, Loral agreed to
indemnify Globalstar Inc. for certain GdB pre-closing
liabilities, primarily related to Brazilian taxes. Loral has
agreed that proceeds from the sale of the Globalstar Inc. common
stock received in the transaction will be kept in a segregated
account and may be used only for payment of the indemnified
liabilities. Remaining indemnified liabilities of
$0.8 million and $1.4 million were included in current
liabilities and $7.7 million and $8.8 million were
included in long-term liabilities as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively.
As of June 30, 2009, we owned 984,173 shares of
Globalstar Inc. common stock including shares obtained in the
sale of GdB, which are accounted for as
available-for-sale
securities, with a fair value of $1.0 million. During the
second quarter of 2008, management determined that there had
been an other than temporary impairment in the fair values of
Globalstar Inc. stock obtained in the sale of GdB. Accordingly,
an impairment charge of $3.5 million was included in our
condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and
six month ended June 30, 2008. Unrealized gains (losses),
net of taxes, on Globalstar shares included in other
comprehensive income were $0.7 million and
$(.4) million for the three months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively, and $0.8 million and
$(.2) million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively.
|
|
9.
|
Intangible
Assets and Amortization of Fair Value Adjustments
|
Intangible Assets were established in connection with our
adoption of fresh-start accounting and consist of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
|
Amortization Period
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
(Years)
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Internally developed software and technology
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
59,027
|
|
|
$
|
(40,563
|
)
|
|
$
|
59,027
|
|
|
$
|
(35,154
|
)
|
Trade names
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
9,200
|
|
|
|
(1,725
|
)
|
|
|
9,200
|
|
|
|
(1,495
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
68,227
|
|
|
$
|
(42,288
|
)
|
|
$
|
68,227
|
|
|
$
|
(36,649
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Total amortization expense for intangible assets was
$2.8 million for each of the three month periods ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008 and $5.6 million for each of
the six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. Annual
amortization expense for intangible assets for the five years
ending December 31, 2013 is estimated to be as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
$
|
11,276
|
|
2010
|
|
|
9,192
|
|
2011
|
|
|
2,931
|
|
2012
|
|
|
2,315
|
|
2013
|
|
|
460
|
|
The following summarizes fair value adjustments in connection
with our adoption of fresh start accounting related to net
unfavorable contracts, recorded in
contracts-in-process,
long-term receivables, customer advances and billings in excess
of costs and profits and long-term liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Gross fair value adjustments
|
|
$
|
(36,896
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36,896
|
)
|
Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
17,965
|
|
|
|
19,084
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(18,931
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,812
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net amortization of these fair value adjustments was a charge to
expense of $0.6 million and $1.1 million for the three
and six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively, and a
credit to expense of $0.5 million and $3.1 million for
the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.
SS/L
Credit Agreement
On October 16, 2008, SS/L entered into a credit agreement
with several banks and other financial institutions. The credit
agreement provides for a $100.0 million senior secured
revolving credit facility. The revolving facility includes a
$50.0 million letter of credit sublimit. The credit
agreement is for a term of three years, maturing on
October 16, 2011.
The following summarizes information related to the SS/L credit
agreement (in thousands, except percentages):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Letters of credit outstanding
|
|
$
|
7,921
|
|
|
$
|
4,927
|
|
Borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
55,000
|
|
Interest rate on revolver borrowings
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2575
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Interest expense (including commitment and letter of credit fees)
|
|
$
|
186
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
711
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Amortization of issuance costs
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
438
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
21
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
During 2009 and 2008, we continued to maintain the 100%
valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets except
with regard to our deferred tax assets related to AMT credit
carryforwards. We will maintain the valuation allowance until
sufficient positive evidence exists to support its reversal. For
periods prior to January 1, 2009 any reduction to the
balance of the valuation allowance as of October 1, 2005
first reduced goodwill, then other intangible assets with any
excess treated as an increase to
paid-in-capital.
For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, goodwill
was reduced by $0.6 million for the reversal of an excess
valuation allowance. With the adoption of SFAS 141(R) on
January 1, 2009, all future reversals of the valuation
allowance balance as of October 1, 2005 are recorded as a
reduction to the income tax provision.
As of June 30, 2009, we had unrecognized tax benefits
relating to uncertain tax positions of $108.2 million. The
Company recognizes potential accrued interest and penalties
related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense on a
quarterly basis. As of June 30, 2009, we have accrued
approximately $17.6 million and $23.7 million for the
payment of potential tax-related interest and penalties,
respectively.
With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to
U.S. federal, state or local income tax examinations by tax
authorities for years prior to 2004. Earlier years related to
certain foreign jurisdictions remain subject to examination.
Various state and foreign income tax returns are currently under
examination. While we intend to contest any future tax
assessments for uncertain tax positions, no assurance can be
provided that we would ultimately prevail. During the next
twelve months, the statute of limitations for assessment of
additional tax will expire with regard to several of our state
income tax returns filed for 2004 and federal and state income
tax returns filed for 2005, potentially resulting in a
$2.7 million reduction to our unrecognized tax benefits.
The liability for uncertain tax positions is included in
long-term liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance
sheets. For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
we increased our liability for uncertain tax positions from
$110.7 million to $114.4 million and from
$69.5 million to $71.3 million, respectively. The
increase of $3.7 million and $1.8 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively,
primarily related to our current provision for potential
additional interest and penalties. For the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, we increased our liability for
uncertain tax positions from $109.0 million to
$114.4 million and from $68.0 million to
$71.3 million, respectively. The net increase of
$5.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
related to (i) an increase of $0.5 million to our
current provision for uncertain tax positions, (ii) an
increase of $5.8 million to our current provision for
potential additional interest and penalties, partially offset by
(iii) a decrease of $0.9 million from the reversal of
liabilities due to the expiration of the statute of limitations
for the assessment of additional state tax for 2003 and 2004
treated as a current income tax benefit. The increase of
$3.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008
related to our current provision for potential additional
interest and penalties. When comparing our current provision for
potential additional interest and penalties for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009 to the three and six months
ended June 30, 2008, the additional provision in 2009
primarily related to new state tax penalties enacted into law
during 2009 applicable to a portion of our liability for
uncertain tax positions.
With the adoption of SFAS 141(R) on January 1, 2009,
as of June 30, 2009, if our positions are sustained by the
taxing authorities, approximately $113.6 million would
reduce the Companys effective tax rate and
$0.8 million would reduce deferred tax assets. Other than
as described above, there were no significant changes to our
uncertain tax positions during the six months ended
June 30, 2009, and we do not anticipate any other
significant increases or decreases to our unrecognized tax
benefits during the next twelve months.
Common
Stock
On November 10, 2008, the Court of Chancery of the State of
Delaware (the Court) issued an Implementing Order
(the Implementing Order) in the In re: Loral
Space and Communications Consolidated Litigation.
22
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Effective December 22, 2008, pursuant to the Implementing
Order, the Securities Purchase Agreement by and between Loral
and MHR Fund Management LLC (together with its affiliates,
MHR), as amended and restated on February 27,
2007 (the SPA), was reformed to provide for MHR to
have purchased 9,505,673 shares of Loral Non-Voting Common
Stock, which are in all respects identical to and treated
equally with shares of Loral Voting Common Stock except for the
absence of voting rights (other than as provided in the New
Charter (defined below) or as provided by law), in exchange for
the net payment of $293.3 million made by MHR to Loral on
February 27, 2007 in connection with the SPA. Pursuant to
the Implementing Order, all other terms of the SPA are of no
further force or effect.
Pursuant to the Implementing Order, on December 23, 2008,
Loral filed an Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation
(the New Charter). The New Charter has been accepted
by the Secretary of State of Delaware and is the operative
certificate of incorporation of Loral. The New Charter was
ratified and amended by Lorals stockholders on
May 19, 2009.
The New Charter, as amended, is substantially the same as the
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Loral previously in
effect, except that the New Charter, as amended, provides that
the total authorized capital stock of the Company is eighty
million (80,000,000) shares consisting of two classes:
(i) seventy million (70,000,000) shares of Common Stock,
$0.01 par value per share divided into two series, of which
50,000,000 shares are Voting Common Stock and
20,000,000 shares are Non-Voting Common Stock, and
(ii) ten million (10,000,000) shares of Preferred Stock,
$0.01 par value per share.
As a result of the cancellation of the Loral Series-1 Preferred
Stock and the issuance of the Non-Voting Common Stock on
December 23, 2008, equity in our consolidated balance sheet
has been adjusted to include the Non-Voting Common Stock at its
fair value on December 23, 2008 and remove the Loral
Series-1 Preferred Stock balances. Fair value was determined
based on the closing market price per share of Loral common
stock on December 23, 2008. The difference between the fair
value of the 9,505,673 shares of Non-Voting Common Stock
and the carrying value of the Loral Series-1 Preferred Stock,
including accrued dividends thereon, has been reflected as an
increase to paid-in capital.
In addition, the Certificates of Designation of the
Series A Preferred Stock (defined below) and Series B
Preferred Stock (defined below) were eliminated and are of no
further force and effect.
Preferred
Stock
On February 27, 2007 (the Issuance Date), Loral
completed a $300.0 million preferred stock financing
pursuant to the SPA, under which Loral sold 136,526 shares
of its
Series A-1
cumulative 7.5% convertible preferred stock (the
Series A-1
Preferred Stock) and 858,486 shares of its
Series B-1
cumulative 7.5% convertible preferred stock (the
Series B-1
Preferred Stock and, together with the
Series A-1
Preferred Stock, the Loral Series-1 Preferred Stock)
at a purchase price of $301.504 per share to various funds
affiliated with MHR (the MHR Funds).
Prior to the conversion of the Loral Series-1 Preferred Stock to
Non-Voting Common Stock, the Loral Series-1 Preferred Stock had,
among others, the following terms:
Each share of the
Series A-1
Preferred Stock was convertible, at the option of the holder,
into ten shares of Loral common stock at a conversion price of
$30.1504 per share. The conversion price reflected a premium of
12% to the closing price of Lorals common stock on
October 16, 2006. The conversion price was subject to
customary adjustments. Dividends on the Loral Series-1 Preferred
Stock were paid in kind (i.e., in additional shares of Loral
Series-1 Preferred Stock).
The Company paid dividends of $6.0 million through the
issuance of 19,915 shares of
Series B-1
Preferred Stock during the three months ended June 30, 2008
and $11.9 million through the issuance of 2,556 shares
and
23
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
36,909 shares of
Series A-1
and
Series B-1
Preferred Stock, respectively, during the six months ended
June 30, 2008.
Loral incurred issuance costs of $8.9 million in connection
with this preferred stock financing. In addition, Loral paid MHR
a placement fee of $6.8 million upon closing of the
financing.
Stock
Plans
As of June 30, 2009, there were 273,373 shares of
Loral common stock available for future grant under the
Companys Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Incentive Plan.
On March 5, 2009, the Compensation Committee approved
awards of restricted stock units (the RSUs) for
certain executives of the Company. Each RSU has a value equal to
one share of Voting Common Stock and generally provides the
recipient with the right to receive one share of Voting Common
Stock or cash equal to the value of one share of Voting Common
Stock, at the option of the Company, on the settlement date.
Michael B. Targoff, Chief Executive Officer of Loral, was
awarded 85,000 RSUs (the Initial Grant) on
March 5, 2009 (the Grant Date). In addition,
the Company agreed to issue Mr. Targoff 50,000 RSUs on the
first anniversary of the Grant Date and 40,000 RSUs on the
second anniversary of the Grant Date (the Subsequent
Grants). Vesting of the Initial Grant requires the
satisfaction of two conditions: a time-based vesting condition
and a stock price vesting condition. Vesting of the Subsequent
Grants is subject only to the stock-price vesting condition. The
time-based vesting condition for the Initial Grant will be
satisfied upon Mr. Targoffs continued employment
through March 5, 2010, the first anniversary of the Grant
Date. The stock price vesting condition, which applies to both
the Initial Grant and the Subsequent Grants, has been satisfied
as of June 30, 2009, because the average closing price of
the Voting Common Stock over a period of 20 consecutive trading
days has been at or above $25 prior to June 30, 2009. Both
the Initial Grant and the Subsequent Grants will be settled on
March 31, 2013.
C. Patrick DeWitt, Senior Vice President of Loral and Chief
Executive Officer of SS/L, was awarded 25,000 RSUs on
March 5, 2009, of which 66.67% vest on March 5, 2010,
with the remainder vesting ratably on a quarterly basis over the
subsequent two years. All of Mr. DeWitts RSUs will be
settled on March 12, 2012.
In April 2009, other SS/L employees were granted
66,259 shares of Loral voting common stock which are fully
vested as of the grant date.
In June 2009, Mr. Targoff was awarded an option to purchase
125,000 shares of Loral voting common stock with an
exercise price of $35 per share. The option is vested with
respect to 25% of the underlying shares upon grant, with the
remainder of the option subject to vesting as to 25% of the
underlying shares on each of the first three anniversaries of
the grant date. The option expires on June 30, 2014.
In June 2009, certain other key employees were granted 225,000
SS/L phantom stock appreciation rights
(SS/L
Phantom SARs). Because SS/L common stock is not freely
tradable on the open market and thus does not have a readily
ascertainable market value, SS/L equity value under the program
is derived from an Adjusted EBITDA-based formula. Each SS/L
Phantom SAR provides the recipient with the right to receive an
amount equal to the increase in SS/Ls notional stock price
over the base price multiplied by the number of SS/L Phantom
SARs vested on the applicable vesting date, subject to
adjustment.
The SS/L Phantom SARs have the following vesting schedule: 50%
vest on March 18, 2010, 25% vest on March 18 of 2011 and
25% vest on March 18, 2012. SS/L Phantom SARs are settled
and the SAR value (if any) is paid out on each vesting date. The
SS/L Phantom SARs expire on June 30, 2016. SS/L Phantom
SARs may be settled in Loral common stock (based on the fair
value of Loral common stock on the date of settlement) or cash
at the option of the Company. The fair value of the SS/L Phantom
SARs is included as a liability in our consolidated balance
sheets. This liability will be adjusted each period to reflect
the fair value of the underlying SS/L shares. As of
June 30, 2009, the amount of the liability in our
consolidated balance sheet related to the SS/L Phantom SARs is
not significant.
24
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Incremental charges to expense for stock-based compensation
related to grants subsequent to December 31, 2008 under the
Companys Amended and Restated 2005 Stock Incentive Plan
were $2.3 million and $2.4 million for the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009, respectively.
|
|
13.
|
Pensions
and Other Employee Benefit Plans
|
The following table provides the components of net periodic
benefit cost for our qualified and supplemental retirement plans
(the Pension Benefits) and health care and life
insurance benefits for retired employees and dependents (the
Other Benefits) for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
2,261
|
|
|
$
|
2,039
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
335
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
5.996
|
|
|
|
5,787
|
|
|
|
1,050
|
|
|
|
1,164
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(4,273
|
)
|
|
|
(6,157
|
)
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
(20
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service credits and net actuarial (gain)
or loss
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
|
(707
|
)
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
|
|
(122
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,210
|
|
|
$
|
962
|
|
|
$
|
1,168
|
|
|
$
|
1,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
|
Other Benefits
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
4,522
|
|
|
$
|
4,078
|
|
|
$
|
528
|
|
|
$
|
670
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
|
11,992
|
|
|
|
11,574
|
|
|
|
2,100
|
|
|
|
2,328
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
|
(8,546
|
)
|
|
|
(12,314
|
)
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service credits and net actuarial (gain)
or loss
|
|
|
452
|
|
|
|
(1,414
|
)
|
|
|
(266
|
)
|
|
|
(244
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,420
|
|
|
$
|
1,924
|
|
|
$
|
2,336
|
|
|
$
|
2,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14.
|
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
Financial
Matters
SS/L has deferred revenue and accrued liabilities for
performance warranty obligations relating to satellites sold to
customers, which could be affected by future performance of the
satellites. These reserves for expected costs for warranty
reimbursement and support are based on historical failure rates.
However, in the event of a catastrophic failure of a satellite,
which cannot be predicted, these reserves likely will not be
sufficient. SS/L periodically reviews and adjusts the deferred
revenue and accrued liabilities for warranty reserves based on
the actual performance of each satellite and remaining warranty
period. A reconciliation of such deferred amounts for the six
months ended June 30, 2009, is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of deferred amounts at January 1, 2009
|
|
$
|
36,255
|
|
Warranty costs incurred including payments
|
|
|
(657
|
)
|
Accruals relating to pre-existing contracts (including changes
in estimates)
|
|
|
668
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance of deferred amounts at June 30, 2009
|
|
$
|
36,266
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Loral has restructured its corporate functions reducing the
number of employees at its headquarters and consolidating some
functions at SS/L. In the fourth quarter of 2007 and the second
quarter of 2008, Loral charged approximately $7.0 million
and $0.3 million, respectively, to selling, general and
administrative expenses, mainly for severance and related costs,
and expects to make cash payments related to the restructuring
primarily through 2009. Loral paid restructuring costs of
approximately $0.4 million and $0.7 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively and
$1.0 million and $3.5 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively and paid cumulative
restructuring costs of $6.7 million as of June 30,
2009. The liability recorded in the condensed consolidated
balance sheet for the restructuring was $0.6 million at
June 30, 2009.
Many of SS/Ls satellite contracts permit SS/Ls
customers to pay a portion of the purchase price for the
satellite over time subject to the continued performance of the
satellite (orbitals), and certain of SS/Ls
satellite contracts require SS/L to provide vendor financing to
its customers, or a combination of these contractual terms. Some
of these arrangements are provided to customers that are
start-up
companies, companies in the early stages of building their
businesses or highly leveraged companies, including some with
near-term debt maturities. There can be no assurance that these
companies or their businesses will be successful and,
accordingly, that these customers will be able to fulfill their
payment obligations under their contracts with SS/L. We believe
that these provisions will not have a material adverse effect on
our consolidated financial position or our results of
operations, although no assurance can be provided. Moreover,
SS/Ls receipt of orbital payments is subject to the
continued performance of its satellites generally over the
contractually stipulated life of the satellites. Because these
orbital receivables could be affected by future satellite
performance, there can be no assurance that SS/L will be able to
collect all or a portion of these receivables. Orbital
receivables and vendor financing receivables included in our
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2009
were $209 million and $0, respectively. Approximately
$76 million of these orbital receivables are related to
satellites launched as of July 31, 2009 and
$133 million are related to satellites under construction
as of July 31, 2009.
As of July 31, 2009, SS/L had past due receivables included
in contracts in process in the aggregate amount of approximately
$6 million, from ICO, a highly-leveraged customer with an
SS/L-built satellite in orbit. ICO has filed for bankruptcy
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. In addition, ICO
has future payment obligations to SS/L which total in excess of
$26 million of which approximately $12 million
(including $9 million of orbital incentives) is included in
long-term receivables. Based on discussions with ICO, we expect
this customer to assume our contract, although there is no
assurance ICO will do so. SS/L also had a past due receivable in
the aggregate amount of approximately $3 million from
Protostar, another highly-leveraged customer with an SS/L-built
satellite in orbit, which amount was included in contracts in
process. Protostar is also experiencing significant financial
difficulties and has filed for bankruptcy protection. To date,
Protostar has not assumed this contract, and there can be no
assurance that this customer will assume SS/Ls contract in
bankruptcy. SS/Ls contracts with both ICO and Protostar,
however, require that SS/L provide orbital anomaly and
troubleshooting support for the life of the satellites.
SS/Ls expertise is also critical in the event that either
of these customers desires to move its satellite to a different
orbital location. SS/L believes that such technical support is
essential to maximize the life and performance of these in-orbit
satellites, which are critical to the operations of these
customers or the value of their principal assets and no other
company can provide this support on a practical basis.
Accordingly, SS/L believes these customers (or their successors
if they undergo reorganization or purchasers of their
satellites) are highly likely to assume such contracts and
fulfill their payment obligations to SS/L.
On July 30, 2007, SS/L entered into an Amended and Restated
Customer Credit Agreement (the Sirius Credit
Agreement) with Sirius Satellite Radio Inc.
(Sirius). Under the Sirius Credit Agreement, SS/L
agreed, subject to the terms and conditions contained therein,
to make loans to Sirius up to an aggregate principal amount of
$100 million to make milestone payments under the Amended
and Restated Satellite Purchase Agreement between Sirius and
SS/L dated as of July 23, 2007 (the Satellite
Purchase Agreement) for the purchase of the Sirius FM-5
and FM-6 Satellites (the Sirius Satellites).
Pursuant to the Sirius Credit Agreement, on December 19,
2008, Sirius ability to borrow under the Sirius Credit
Agreement to reimburse itself for milestone payments it had
previously made with its own funds expired. Any loans made under
the Sirius Credit Agreement are secured by
26
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Sirius right, title and interest in its rights under the
Satellite Purchase Agreement, including its rights in and to the
Sirius Satellites. The loans are also entitled to the benefits
of a subsidiary guarantee from Satellite CD Radio, Inc. and any
future material subsidiary that may be formed or acquired by
Sirius, other than XM Radio and any other subsidiary designated
as an unrestricted subsidiary under the indenture
governing Siriuss
95/8% senior
notes due 2013. The maturity date of the loans is the earliest
to occur of (i) June 10, 2010, (ii) 90 days
after the FM-6 Satellite becomes available for shipment and
(iii) 30 days prior to the scheduled launch of the
FM-6 Satellite. Loans made under the Sirius Credit Agreement
generally bear interest at a variable rate equal to three-month
LIBOR plus a margin. The Sirius Credit Agreement permits Sirius
to prepay all or a portion of the loans outstanding without
penalty. SS/L believes that, as of July 31, 2009, Sirius is
not eligible for any borrowings on the FM-5 Satellite and,
subject to satisfaction of the conditions set forth in the
Sirius Credit Agreement, would be eligible to borrow up to
$21 million under the Sirius Credit Agreement upon
incurrence of future milestone payments on the FM-6 Satellite.
As of June 30, 2009, no loans were outstanding under the
Sirius Credit Agreement.
Sirius has requested payment from SS/L of $15 million in
liquidated damages with respect to the claimed late delivery of
the FM-5 Satellite. SS/L believes that, in accordance with the
Satellite Purchase Agreement, SS/L is not subject to the
liquidated damages penalty because the Agreement provides that
penalties for delivery schedule delays are not applicable when
the delays were due solely to technical reasons affecting
SS/Ls subcontractors. SS/L is pursuing resolution of this
matter through arbitration pursuant to the provisions of the
Satellite Purchase Agreement. There can be no assurance that
SS/L will prevail in this dispute.
See Note 17 Related Party
Transactions Transactions with
Affiliates Telesat for commitments and
contingencies relating to our agreement to indemnify Telesat for
certain liabilities and our arrangements with ViaSat, Inc. and
Telesat.
Satellite
Matters
Satellites are built with redundant components or additional
components to provide excess performance margins to permit their
continued operation in case of component failure, an event that
is not uncommon in complex satellites. Twenty-nine of the
satellites built by SS/L and launched since 1997 have
experienced some loss of power from their solar arrays. There
can be no assurance that one or more of the affected satellites
will not experience additional power loss. In the event of
additional power loss, the extent of the performance
degradation, if any, will depend on numerous factors, including
the amount of the additional power loss, the level of redundancy
built into the affected satellites design, when in the
life of the affected satellite the loss occurred, how many
transponders are then in service and how they are being used. It
is also possible that one or more transponders on a satellite
may need to be removed from service to accommodate the power
loss and to preserve full performance capabilities on the
remaining transponders. A complete or partial loss of a
satellites capacity could result in a loss of orbital
incentive payments to SS/L. SS/L has implemented remediation
measures that SS/L believes will prevent satellites launched
after June 2001 from experiencing similar anomalies. Based upon
information currently available relating to the power losses, we
believe that this matter will not have a material adverse effect
on our consolidated financial position or our results of
operations, although no assurance can be provided.
Non-performance can increase costs and subject SS/L to damage
claims from customers and termination of the contract for
SS/Ls default. SS/Ls contracts contain detailed and
complex technical specifications to which the satellite must be
built. It is very common that satellites built by SS/L do not
conform in every single respect to, and contain a small number
of minor deviations from, the technical specifications.
Customers typically accept the satellite with such minor
deviations. In the case of more significant deviations, however,
SS/L may incur increased costs to bring the satellite within or
close to the contractual specifications or a customer may
exercise its contractual right to terminate the contract for
default. In some cases, such as when the actual weight of the
satellite exceeds the specified weight, SS/L may incur a
predetermined penalty with respect to the deviation. A failure
by SS/L to deliver a satellite to its customer by the specified
delivery date, which may result from factors beyond SS/Ls
control, such as delayed performance or non-performance by its
subcontractors or failure to obtain necessary governmental
27
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
licenses for delivery, would also be harmful to SS/L unless
mitigated by applicable contract terms, such as excusable delay.
As a general matter, SS/Ls failure to deliver beyond any
contractually provided grace period would result in the
incurrence of liquidated damages by SS/L, which may be
substantial, and if SS/L is still unable to deliver the
satellite upon the end of the liquidated damages period, the
customer will generally have the right to terminate the contract
for default. If a contract is terminated for default, SS/L would
be liable for a refund of customer payments made to date, and
could also have additional liability for excess re-procurement
costs and other damages incurred by its customer, although SS/L
would own the satellite under construction and attempt to recoup
any losses through resale to another customer. A contract
termination for default could have a material adverse effect on
SS/L and us.
SS/L currently has a
contract-in-process
with an estimated delivery date later than the contractually
specified date after which the customer can terminate the
contract for default. The customer is an established operator
for which SS/L has built a sizable portion of its fleet and
which requires the satellite for the continued operation of its
business. SS/L and the customer are continuing to perform under
the contract, and, although there can be no assurance, the
Company believes that the customer will take delivery of this
satellite and will not seek to terminate the contract for
default. If the customer should successfully terminate the
contract for default, the customer would be entitled to a full
refund of its payments and liquidated damages, which through
July 31, 2009 totaled approximately $137 million, plus
re-procurement costs and interest and SS/L would own the
satellite.
SS/L is building a satellite known as CMBStar under a contract
with EchoStar Corporation (EchoStar). Satellite
construction is substantially complete. EchoStar and SS/L have
agreed to suspend final construction of the satellite pending,
among other things, further analysis relating to efforts to meet
the satellite performance criteria
and/or
confirmation that alternative performance criteria would be
acceptable. EchoStar has also stated that it is currently
evaluating potential alternative uses for the CMBStar satellite.
There can be no assurance that a dispute will not arise as to
whether the satellite meets its technical performance
specifications or if such a dispute did arise that SS/L would
prevail. SS/L believes that it will not incur a material loss
with respect to this program.
In November 2004, Galaxy 27 (formerly Telstar
7) experienced an anomaly which caused it to completely
cease operations for several days before it was partially
recovered. In June 2008, Galaxy 26 (formerly Telstar
6) experienced a similar anomaly which caused the loss of
power to one of the satellites solar arrays. Three other
satellites manufactured by SS/L for other customers have designs
similar to Galaxy 27 and Galaxy 26 and, therefore, could be
susceptible to similar anomalies in the future. A partial or
complete loss of these satellites could result in the incurrence
of warranty payments by SS/L of up to $3.9 million, of
which $0.8 million has been accrued as of June 30,
2009.
SS/L relies, in part, on patents, trade secrets and know-how to
develop and maintain its competitive position. There can be no
assurance that infringement of existing third party patents has
not occurred or will not occur. In the event of infringement, we
could be required to pay royalties to obtain a license from the
patent holder, refund money to customers for components that are
not useable or redesign our products to avoid infringement, all
of which would increase our costs. We may also be required under
the terms of our customer contracts to indemnify our customers
for damages.
See Note 17 Related Party
Transactions Transactions with
Affiliates Telesat for commitments and
contingencies relating to SS/Ls obligation to make
payments to Telesat for transponders on Telstar 10 and Telstar
18.
Regulatory
Matters
SS/L is required to obtain licenses and enter into technical
assistance agreements, presently under the jurisdiction of the
State Department, in connection with the export of satellites
and related equipment, and with the disclosure of technical data
or provision of defense services to foreign persons. Due to the
relationship between launch technology and missile technology,
the U.S. government has limited, and is likely in the
future to limit, launches from China and other foreign
countries. Delays in obtaining the necessary licenses and
technical
28
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
assistance agreements have in the past resulted in, and may in
the future result in, the delay of SS/Ls performance on
its contracts, which could result in the cancellation of
contracts by its customers, the incurrence of penalties or the
loss of incentive payments under these contracts.
Legal
Proceedings
Delaware
Shareholder Litigation
In connection with the In re: Loral Space and Communications
Inc. Consolidated Litigation relating to the Companys
sale of $300 million of preferred stock to certain funds
affiliated with MHR (the MHR Funds) pursuant to the
Securities Purchase Agreement dated October 17, 2006, as
amended and restated on February 27, 2007 (the
Securities Purchase Agreement), the Company has
filed an appeal with the Delaware Supreme Court with respect to
the February 20, 2008 order of the Court of Chancery of the
State of Delaware in and for New Castle County (the
Chancery Court) granting certification of the class
of Loral shareholders and the December 22, 2008 order
resolving plaintiffs attorneys applications for
attorneys fees and expenses that awarded class counsel in
the litigation fees and expenses in the amount of
$10.6 million (the Class Counsel Award)
which Loral paid on December 31, 2008. On July 23,
2009, the Delaware Supreme Court affirmed the judgment of the
Chancery Court. In addition, in January 2009, Loral paid counsel
for the derivative plaintiffs in the litigation a total amount
of $8.8 million for fees and expenses incurred in
connection with the litigation (the Derivative Fee
Award and, together with the Class Counsel Award, the
Fee Awards), which was accrued in other current
liabilities on the consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2008.
New York
Shareholder Litigation
In connection with the Babus v. Targoff, et al.
shareholder derivative litigation related to the Securities
Purchase Agreement, which was filed in 2006 in the Supreme Court
of the State of New York, County of New York, against all
members of the Loral board of directors, MHR, the MHR Funds and
other entities affiliated with MHR and Loral as a nominal
defendant, in light of the decision in the Delaware shareholder
litigation discussed above, in April 2009, the plaintiff
requested, and, in June 2009, the court entered, a voluntary
discontinuance of the action with prejudice.
Insurance
Coverage Litigation
The Company is obligated to indemnify its directors and officers
for expenses incurred by them in connection with their defense
in the shareholder derivative litigations described above. The
Company has purchased directors and officers liability insurance
coverage that provides the Company with coverage of up to
$40 million for amounts paid as a result of the
Companys indemnification obligations to its directors and
officers and for losses incurred by the Company in certain
circumstances, including shareholder derivative actions.
The Companys insurers have denied coverage of the Fee
Awards and, in December 2008, commenced an action against the
Company in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of
New York, seeking a declaratory judgment declaring that
(x) the applicable insurance policies do not provide
coverage for the Fee Awards; (y) even if the terms of the
policies would otherwise cover the Fee Awards, Loral breached
the cooperation clause of the policies thereby relieving the
insurers of any liability under the policies; and (z) in
the alternative, to the extent that the court finds that Loral
is entitled to coverage of the Fee Awards, coverage is available
only for a small portion of the Derivative Fee Award. The
Company believes that the Fee Awards are covered by and
reimbursable under its insurance and, in February 2009, the
Company filed its answer and counterclaims in which it asserted
its rights to coverage. In April 2009, the insurers filed their
reply and defenses to the Companys counterclaims. In May
2009, the insurers filed a motion for partial summary judgment
declaring that there is no coverage for the Fee Awards. In July
2009, the Company filed its opposition to the insurers
motion and its own cross motion for partial summary judgment
declaring that the Fee Awards are covered under the applicable
insurance policies.
29
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The Company has received requests for indemnification and
advancement of expenses from its directors who are not
affiliated with MHR under their indemnification agreements with
the Company for any losses or costs they may incur as a result
of the In re: Loral Space and Communications Inc.
Consolidated Litigation and Babus lawsuits. As of
July 31, 2009, after giving effect to a $5.0 million
deductible, the insurers have advanced approximately
$9.5 million in defense costs for the Companys
directors who are not affiliated with MHR, but have denied
coverage for approximately $1.0 million of such defense
costs (the Denied Fees and Expenses). The Company is
disputing the insurers denial of the Denied Fees and
Expenses and is seeking to recover such fees and expenses in the
above-referenced insurance coverage litigation.
In addition, the Company has received a request for
indemnification from its directors who are affiliated with MHR
for defense costs in the amount, as of November 30, 2008,
of approximately $18 million (the MHR-Affiliated
Director Indemnity Claim). The Company has referred this
request for indemnification to Mr. John Stenbit, who has
been appointed by the Board of Directors to act as an
independent special committee of the Board with respect to
determination of the amount of defense costs properly allocable
to the MHR-affiliated directors in their capacity as Loral
directors and for which they are entitled to indemnification.
Since the special committee has not yet made any determinations
with respect to its assignment, the Company cannot estimate how
much, if any, of the $18 million claimed by the directors
affiliated with MHR will be subject to indemnification. In
addition, the insurers have taken the position that it appears
that no coverage is available for the MHR-Affiliated Director
Indemnity Claim and have reserved their rights with respect
thereto. The Company does not agree with the insurers
position and is seeking to recover from the insurers in the
above-referenced insurance coverage litigation any fees and
expenses that may properly be payable to the MHR-affiliated
directors.
There can be no assurance that the Companys positions
regarding insurance coverage for the Fee Awards, the Denied Fees
and Expenses or the MHR-Affiliated Director Indemnity Claim will
prevail or, if it does prevail on one or more of its positions,
that the coverage limit will be adequate to cover the Fee
Awards, all defense costs for its directors (including any
amounts properly payable to the MHR-affiliated directors) and
the Denied Fees and Expenses.
Informal
SEC Inquiry
In June and July 2007, we received letters from the Staff of the
Division of Enforcement of the SEC informing the Company that it
is conducting an informal inquiry and requesting that the
Company provide certain documents and information relating
primarily to the Securities Purchase Agreement and activities
before and after its execution as well as documents and
information relating to the redemption of certain notes issued
by Loral Skynet and documents and information regarding the
directors and officers of Loral. The letter advised that the
informal inquiry should not be construed as an indication by the
SEC or its staff that any violations of law have occurred, or as
an adverse reflection upon any person or security. The Company
has fully cooperated with the SEC staff during the
investigation. There has been no activity with respect to the
investigation since November 2007. In addition, the Company has
received requests for indemnification and advancement of
expenses from certain of its advisors with respect to costs they
may incur as a result of compliance with SEC document requests.
Reorganization
Matters
On July 15, 2003, Old Loral and certain of its subsidiaries
(collectively with Old Loral, the Debtors) filed
voluntary petitions for reorganization under chapter 11 of
title 11 (Chapter 11) of the United States
Code (the Bankruptcy Code) in the
U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York
(the Bankruptcy Court) (Lead Case
No. 03-41710
(RDD), Case Nos.
03-41709
(RDD) through
03-41728
(RDD)) (the Chapter 11 Cases). The Debtors
emerged from Chapter 11 on November 21, 2005 pursuant
to the terms of their fourth amended joint plan of
reorganization, as modified (the Plan of
Reorganization).
Disputed Claims. In connection with our Plan
of Reorganization, certain claims were filed against Old Loral
and certain of its subsidiaries, the validity or amount of which
we disputed. To the extent any disputed claims
30
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
become allowed claims, the claimants would be entitled to
distributions under the Plan of Reorganization based upon the
amount of the allowed claim, payable either in cash for claims
against SS/L or Loral SpaceCom Corporation or in Loral common
stock for all other claims. As of June 30, 2009, except
with respect to the D&O Claims discussed below and a claim
discussed below related to our collection in July 2008 of a
$58 million judgment against Rainbow DBS Holdings, Inc.
(Rainbow), we have resolved all disputed claims. We
have reserved approximately 71,000 of the 20 million shares
of Loral common stock distributable under the Plan of
Reorganization for disputed claims that may ultimately be
payable in common stock. To the extent that disputed claims do
not become allowed claims, shares held in reserve on account of
such claims will be distributed pursuant to the Plan of
Reorganization pro rata to claimants with allowed claims. The
disputed claim relating to the Rainbow judgment arose from the
assertion by a third party of a prepetition claim against the
Company that it was entitled to receive $3 million of the
proceeds of the judgment, which the third party believed was
payable in full in cash with interest. The Company, however,
believed the claim was payable in common stock under its Plan of
Reorganization. After a hearing regarding this dispute before
the Bankruptcy Court, the Bankruptcy Court ruled in favor of the
Company and entered a final order to that effect on
November 3, 2008. The third party appealed the Bankruptcy
Courts decision to the District Court, and, on
July 28, 2009, the District Court affirmed the judgment of
the Bankruptcy Court. The third party has 30 days in which
to appeal the District Courts decision to the Second
Circuit Court of Appeals. The effect of the issuance of the
common stock attributable to this claim was recorded in
connection with our fresh-start accounting as of October 1,
2005.
Indemnification Claims of Directors and Officers of Old
Loral. Old Loral was obligated to indemnify its
directors and officers for, among other things, any losses or
costs they may incur as a result of the lawsuits described below
in Old Loral Class Action Securities Litigations.
Most directors and officers have filed proofs of claim (the
D&O Claims) in unliquidated amounts with
respect to the prepetition indemnity obligations of the Debtors.
The Debtors and these directors and officers have agreed that in
no event will their indemnity claims against Old Loral and Loral
Orion, Inc. in the aggregate exceed $25 million and
$5 million, respectively. If any of these claims ultimately
becomes an allowed claim under the Plan of Reorganization, the
claimant would be entitled to a distribution under the Plan of
Reorganization of Loral common stock based upon the amount of
the allowed claim. Any such distribution of stock would be in
addition to the 20 million shares of Loral common stock
distributed under the Plan of Reorganization to other creditors.
Instead of issuing such additional shares, Loral may elect to
satisfy any allowed claim in cash in an amount equal to the
number of shares to which plaintiffs would have been entitled
multiplied by $27.75 or in a combination of additional shares
and cash. We believe, although no assurance can be given, that
Loral will not incur any substantial losses as a result of these
claims.
Old Loral
Class Action Securities Litigations
Beleson. In August 2003, plaintiffs Robert
Beleson and Harvey Matcovsky filed a purported class action
complaint against Bernard L. Schwartz, the former Chief
Executive Officer of Loral, in the United States District Court
for the Southern District of New York. The complaint sought,
among other things, damages in an unspecified amount and
reimbursement of plaintiffs reasonable costs and expenses.
The complaint alleged (a) that Mr. Schwartz violated
Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the
Exchange Act) and
Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder, by making material misstatements or
failing to state material facts about our financial condition
relating to the sale of assets to Intelsat and our
chapter 11 filing and (b) that Mr. Schwartz is
secondarily liable for these alleged misstatements and omissions
under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act as an alleged
controlling person of Old Loral. The class of
plaintiffs on whose behalf the lawsuit has been asserted
consists of all buyers of Old Loral common stock during the
period from June 30, 2003 through July 15, 2003,
excluding the defendant and certain persons related to or
affiliated with him. In November 2003, three other complaints
against Mr. Schwartz with substantially similar allegations
were consolidated into the Beleson case. The defendant
filed a motion for summary judgment in July 2008 and plaintiffs
filed a cross-motion for partial summary judgment in September
2008. On February 24, 2009, the court granted
defendants motion and denied plaintiffs cross
motion. On or about March 24, 2009, plaintiffs filed a
notice of appeal with respect to the courts decision.
Since this case was not brought against
31
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Old Loral, but only against one of its officers, we believe,
although no assurance can be given, that, to the extent that any
award is ultimately granted to the plaintiffs in this action,
the liability of Loral, if any, with respect thereto is limited
solely to the D&O Claims as described above under
Reorganization Matters Indemnification
Claims.
Christ. In November 2003, plaintiffs Tony
Christ, individually and as custodian for Brian and Katelyn
Christ, Casey Crawford, Thomas Orndorff and Marvin Rich, filed a
purported class action complaint against
Bernard L. Schwartz and Richard J. Townsend, the
former Chief Financial Officer of Loral, in the United States
District Court for the Southern District of New York. The
complaint sought, among other things, damages in an unspecified
amount and reimbursement of plaintiffs reasonable costs
and expenses. The complaint alleged (a) that defendants
violated Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and
Rule 10b-5
promulgated thereunder, by making material misstatements or
failing to state material facts about Old Lorals financial
condition relating to the restatement in 2003 of the financial
statements for the second and third quarters of 2002 to correct
accounting for certain general and administrative expenses and
the alleged improper accounting for a satellite transaction with
APT Satellite Company Ltd. and (b) that each of the
defendants is secondarily liable for these alleged misstatements
and omissions under Section 20(a) of the Exchange Act as an
alleged controlling person of Old Loral. The class
of plaintiffs on whose behalf the lawsuit has been asserted
consists of all buyers of Old Loral common stock during the
period from July 31, 2002 through June 29, 2003,
excluding the defendants and certain persons related to or
affiliated with them. On September 30, 2008, the parties
entered into an agreement to settle the case, pursuant to which
a settlement will be funded entirely by Old Lorals
directors and officers liability insurer, and Loral will not be
required to make any contribution toward the settlement. By
order dated February 26, 2009, the court finally approved
the settlement as fair, reasonable and adequate and in the best
interests of the class. Certain class members have objected to
the settlement, and have filed a notice of appeal. In addition,
certain objectors, who together had class period purchases
valued at approximately $550,000, elected to opt out of the
class action settlement and have commenced individual lawsuits
against the defendants. Since this case was not brought against
Old Loral, but only against certain of its officers, we believe,
although no assurance can be given, that, should the settlement
not be consummated or should any objectors who opted out of the
settlement prevail in lawsuits they may bring, to the extent
that any award is ultimately granted to the plaintiffs or
objectors in this action, the liability of Loral, if any, with
respect thereto is limited solely to the D&O Claims as
described above under Reorganization
Matters Indemnification Claims.
Other and
Routine Litigation
We are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims,
either asserted or unasserted, that arise in the ordinary course
of business. Although the outcome of these legal proceedings and
claims cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not believe
that any of these other existing legal matters will have a
material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position
or our results of operations.
32
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
15.
|
Earnings
(Loss) Per Share
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed based upon the
weighted average number of shares of voting and non-voting
common stock outstanding. The following is the computation of
diluted earnings (loss) per share (in thousands, except per
share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Net income (loss) applicable to common shareholders
|
|
$
|
74,295
|
|
|
$
|
45,851
|
|
|
$
|
63,467
|
|
|
$
|
(31,354
|
)
|
Dividends on Loral Series A-1 Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
814
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) for diluted income (loss) per share calculation
|
|
$
|
74,295
|
|
|
$
|
46,665
|
|
|
$
|
63,467
|
|
|
$
|
(31,354
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common and potential common shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
29,753
|
|
|
|
20,169
|
|
|
|
29,727
|
|
|
|
20,162
|
|
Unvested restricted stock units
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unvested restricted stock
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assumed conversion of Loral
Series A-1
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,445
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common and potential common shares
|
|
|
29,904
|
|
|
|
21,614
|
|
|
|
29,803
|
|
|
|
20,162
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted income (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
2.48
|
|
|
$
|
2.16
|
|
|
$
|
2.13
|
|
|
$
|
(1.56
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 and the
six months ended June 30, 2009, the effect of stock options
outstanding, which would be calculated using the treasury stock
method and certain non-vested restricted stock and non-vested
RSUs were excluded from the calculation of diluted loss per
share, as the effect would have been antidilutive. For the six
months ended June 30, 2008, all stock options outstanding,
non-vested restricted stock and non-vested RSUs were excluded
from the calculation of diluted loss per share as the effect
would have been anti-dilutive. The following summarizes stock
options outstanding, non-vested restricted stock and non-vested
restricted stock units excluded from the calculation of diluted
income (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Stock options outstanding
|
|
|
2,157,952
|
|
|
|
2,034,202
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of non-vested restricted stock
|
|
|
50,898
|
|
|
|
118,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested restricted stock units
|
|
|
23,250
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loral has two operating segments: Satellite Manufacturing and
Satellite Services. Our segment reporting data includes
unconsolidated affiliates that meet the reportable segment
criteria of SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about
Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information. The
satellite services segment includes 100% of the results reported
by Telesat for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008. Although we analyze Telesats revenue and
expenses under the satellite services segment, we eliminate its
results in our consolidated financial statements, where we
report our 64% share of Telesats results under the equity
method of accounting. Our investment in XTAR, for which we use
the equity method of accounting, is included in Corporate.
33
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
We use Adjusted EBITDA to evaluate operating performance of our
segments, to allocate resources and capital to such segments, to
measure performance for incentive compensation programs, and to
evaluate future growth opportunities. The common definition of
EBITDA is Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation
and Amortization. In evaluating financial performance, we
use revenues and operating (loss) income before depreciation and
amortization (including amortization of stock based
compensation), (Adjusted EBITDA) as the measure of a
segments profit or loss. Adjusted EBITDA is equivalent to
the common definition of EBITDA before gain on litigation
recovery, impairment of available for sale securities, other
expense and equity in net income (losses) of affiliates.
Adjusted EBITDA allows us and investors to compare our operating
results with that of competitors exclusive of depreciation and
amortization, interest and investment income, interest expense,
gain on litigation recovery, impairment of available for sale
securities, other expense and equity in net losses of
affiliates. Financial results of competitors in our industry
have significant variations that can result from timing of
capital expenditures, the amount of intangible assets recorded,
the differences in assets lives, the timing and amount of
investments, the effects of other expense, which are typically
for non-recurring transactions not related to the on-going
business, and effects of investments not directly managed. The
use of Adjusted EBITDA allows us and investors to compare
operating results exclusive of these items. Competitors in our
industry have significantly different capital structures. The
use of Adjusted EBITDA maintains comparability of performance by
excluding interest expense.
We believe the use of Adjusted EBITDA along with U.S. GAAP
financial measures enhances the understanding of our operating
results and is useful to us and investors in comparing
performance with competitors, estimating enterprise value and
making investment decisions. Adjusted EBITDA as used here may
not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by
competitors. Adjusted EBITDA should be used in conjunction with
U.S. GAAP financial measures and is not presented as an
alternative to cash flow from operations as a measure of our
liquidity or as an alternative to net income as an indicator of
our operating performance.
34
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Intersegment revenues primarily consists of satellites under
construction by Satellite Manufacturing for Loral. Summarized
financial information concerning the reportable segments is as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite manufacturing:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External revenues
|
|
$
|
254,858
|
|
|
$
|
178,976
|
|
|
$
|
443,108
|
|
|
$
|
378,164
|
|
Intersegment
revenues(1)
|
|
|
21,001
|
|
|
|
31,268
|
|
|
|
49,198
|
|
|
|
51,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite manufacturing revenues
|
|
|
275,859
|
|
|
|
210,244
|
|
|
|
492,306
|
|
|
|
430,031
|
|
Satellite services
revenues(2)
|
|
|
172,150
|
|
|
|
172,383
|
|
|
|
337,397
|
|
|
|
338,887
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating segment revenues before eliminations
|
|
|
448,009
|
|
|
|
382,627
|
|
|
|
829,703
|
|
|
|
768,918
|
|
Intercompany
eliminations(3)
|
|
|
(4,412
|
)
|
|
|
(2,183
|
)
|
|
|
(8,368
|
)
|
|
|
(3,433
|
)
|
Affiliate
eliminations(2)
|
|
|
(172,150
|
)
|
|
|
(172,383
|
)
|
|
|
(337,397
|
)
|
|
|
(338,887
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues as reported
|
|
$
|
271,447
|
|
|
$
|
208,061
|
|
|
$
|
483,938
|
|
|
$
|
426,598
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite manufacturing
|
|
$
|
12,109
|
|
|
$
|
10,188
|
|
|
$
|
22,546
|
|
|
$
|
14,865
|
|
Satellite
services(2)
|
|
|
119,280
|
|
|
|
111,777
|
|
|
|
234,193
|
|
|
|
211,164
|
|
Corporate(4)
|
|
|
(6,352
|
)
|
|
|
(1,497
|
)
|
|
|
(10,751
|
)
|
|
|
(6,240
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA before eliminations
|
|
|
125,037
|
|
|
|
120,468
|
|
|
|
245,988
|
|
|
|
219,789
|
|
Intercompany
eliminations(3)
|
|
|
(525
|
)
|
|
|
(329
|
)
|
|
|
(1,092
|
)
|
|
|
(509
|
)
|
Affiliate
eliminations(2)
|
|
|
(119,280
|
)
|
|
|
(105,637
|
)
|
|
|
(234,193
|
)
|
|
|
(205,024
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
5,232
|
|
|
$
|
14,502
|
|
|
$
|
10,703
|
|
|
$
|
14,256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, Amortization and Stock-Based Compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite manufacturing
|
|
$
|
(12,202
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,723
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,132
|
)
|
|
$
|
(17,382
|
)
|
Satellite
services(2)
|
|
|
(55,604
|
)
|
|
|
(56,757
|
)
|
|
|
(106,122
|
)
|
|
|
(115,221
|
)
|
Corporate
|
|
|
(725
|
)
|
|
|
(1,244
|
)
|
|
|
(1,745
|
)
|
|
|
(3,147
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment depreciation before affiliate eliminations
|
|
|
(68,531
|
)
|
|
|
(66,724
|
)
|
|
|
(129,999
|
)
|
|
|
(135,750
|
)
|
Affiliate
eliminations(2)
|
|
|
55,604
|
|
|
|
56,757
|
|
|
|
106,122
|
|
|
|
115,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation as
reported
|
|
$
|
(12,927
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9,967
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,877
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,529
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income as reported
|
|
$
|
(7,695
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,536
|
|
|
$
|
(13,175
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,274
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Total Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite manufacturing
|
|
$
|
797,310
|
|
|
$
|
799,476
|
|
Satellite services (includes goodwill of $2.1 billion and
$2.5 billion)(2)
|
|
|
4,421,874
|
|
|
|
4,273,162
|
|
Corporate
|
|
|
260,300
|
|
|
|
196,391
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets before affiliate eliminations
|
|
|
5,479,484
|
|
|
|
5,269,029
|
|
Affiliate
eliminations(2)
|
|
|
(4,421,874
|
)
|
|
|
(4,273,162
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets as
reported(5)
|
|
$
|
1,057,610
|
|
|
$
|
995,867
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Intersegment revenues for satellite manufacturing includes
affiliate revenue of $16.6 million and $29.1 million
for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively and $40.8 million and $48.4 million for
the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Satellite services represents Telesat. Satellite services
Adjusted EBITDA also includes approximately $6 million for
the three and six months ended June 30 2008, related to the
distribution from a bankruptcy claim against a former customer
of Loral Skynet. Affiliate eliminations represent the
elimination of amounts attributable to Telesat whose results are
reported under the equity method of accounting in our condensed
consolidated statements of operations (see Note 8). |
|
(3) |
|
Represents the elimination of intercompany sales and
intercompany Adjusted EBITDA, primarily for satellites under
construction by SS/L for Loral. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents corporate expenses incurred in support of our
operations. |
|
(5) |
|
Amounts are presented after the elimination of intercompany
profit. |
|
|
17.
|
Related
Party Transactions
|
Transactions
with Affiliates
Telesat
As described in Note 8, we own 64% of Telesat and account
for our investment under the equity method of accounting.
In connection with the acquisition of our ownership interest in
Telesat (which we refer to as the Telesat transaction), Loral
and certain of its subsidiaries, our Canadian partner, Public
Sector Pension Investment Board (PSP) and one of its
subsidiaries, Telesat Holdco and certain of its subsidiaries,
including Telesat, and MHR entered into a Shareholders Agreement
(the Shareholders Agreement). The Shareholders
Agreement provides for, among other things, the manner in which
the affairs of Telesat Holdco and its subsidiaries will be
conducted and the relationships among the parties thereto and
future shareholders of Telesat Holdco. The Shareholders
Agreement also contains an agreement by Loral not to engage in a
competing satellite communications business and agreements by
the parties to the Shareholders Agreement not to solicit
employees of Telesat Holdco or any of its subsidiaries.
Additionally, the Shareholders Agreement details the matters
requiring the approval of the shareholders of Telesat Holdco
(including veto rights for Loral over certain extraordinary
actions), provides for preemptive rights for certain
shareholders upon the issuance of certain capital shares of
Telesat Holdco and provides for either PSP or Loral to cause
Telesat Holdco to conduct an initial public offering of its
equity shares if an initial public offering is not completed by
the fourth anniversary of the Telesat transaction. The
Shareholders Agreement also restricts the ability of holders of
certain shares of Telesat Holdco to transfer such shares unless
certain conditions are met or approval of the transfer is
granted by the directors of Telesat Holdco, provides for a right
of first offer to certain Telesat Holdco shareholders if a
holder of equity shares of Telesat Holdco wishes to sell any
36
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
such shares to a third party and provides for, in certain
circumstances, tag-along rights in favor of shareholders that
are not affiliated with Loral if Loral sells equity shares and
drag-along rights in favor of Loral in case Loral or its
affiliate enters into an agreement to sell all of its Telesat
Holdco equity securities.
Under the Shareholders Agreement, in the event that either
(i) ownership or control, directly or indirectly, by
Dr. Rachesky, President of MHR, of Lorals voting
stock falls below certain levels or (ii) there is a change
in the composition of a majority of the members of the Loral
Board of Directors over a consecutive two-year period, Loral
will lose its veto rights relating to certain extraordinary
actions by Telesat Holdco and its subsidiaries. In addition,
after either of these events, PSP will have certain rights to
enable it to exit from its investment in Telesat Holdco,
including a right to cause Telesat Holdco to conduct an initial
public offering in which PSPs shares would be the first
shares offered or, if no such offering has occurred within one
year due to a lack of cooperation from Loral or Telesat Holdco,
to cause the sale of Telesat Holdco and to drag along the other
shareholders in such sale, subject to Lorals right to call
PSPs shares at fair market value.
The Shareholders Agreement provides for a board of directors of
each of Telesat Holdco and certain of its subsidiaries,
including Telesat, consisting of 10 directors, three
nominated by Loral, three nominated by PSP and four independent
directors to be selected by a nominating committee comprised of
one PSP nominee, one nominee of Loral and one of the independent
directors then in office. Each party to the Shareholders
Agreement is obligated to vote all of its Telesat Holdco shares
for the election of the directors nominated by the nominating
committee. Pursuant to action by the board of directors taken on
October 31, 2007, Dr. Rachesky, who is non-executive
Chairman of the Board of Directors of Loral, was appointed
non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of Telesat
Holdco and certain of its subsidiaries, including Telesat. In
addition, Michael B. Targoff, Lorals Vice Chairman, Chief
Executive Officer and President serves on the board of directors
of Telesat Holdco and certain of its subsidiaries, including
Telesat.
As of June 30, 2009, SS/L had a contract with Telesat for
the construction of the Nimiq 5 satellite. Information related
to satellite construction contracts with Telesat is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
Revenues from Telesat satellite construction contracts
|
|
$
|
16,571
|
|
|
$
|
29,055
|
|
|
$
|
40,819
|
|
|
$
|
48,404
|
|
Milestone payments received from Telesat
|
|
|
16,894
|
|
|
|
29,774
|
|
|
|
31,618
|
|
|
|
51,261
|
|
Amounts receivable by SS/L from Telesat as of June 30, 2009
and December 31, 2008, were $3.2 million and
$3.2 million, respectively, related to satellite
construction contracts. In July 2009, Telesat and SS/L entered
into a contract for construction of the Telstar 14R satellite.
On October 31, 2007, Loral and Telesat entered into a
consulting services agreement (the Consulting
Agreement). Pursuant to the terms of the Consulting
Agreement, Loral provides to Telesat certain non-exclusive
consulting services in relation to the business of Loral Skynet
which was transferred to Telesat as part of the Telesat
transaction as well as with respect to certain aspects of the
satellite communications business of Telesat. The Consulting
Agreement has a term of seven years with an automatic renewal
for an additional seven year term if certain conditions are met.
In exchange for Lorals services under the Consulting
Agreement, Telesat will pay Loral an annual fee of US
$5.0 million, payable quarterly in arrears on the last day
of March, June, September and December of each year during the
term of the Consulting Agreement. If the terms of Telesats
bank or bridge facilities or certain other debt obligations
prevent Telesat from paying such fees in cash, Telesat can issue
junior subordinated promissory notes to Loral in the amount of
such payment, with interest on such promissory notes payable at
the rate of 7% per annum, compounded quarterly, from the date of
issue of such promissory note to the date of payment thereof.
Our selling, general and administrative expenses included income
related to the Consulting Agreement of $1.25 million for
each of the three month periods ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 and $2.5 million for each of the six month periods
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. We also had a long-term
receivable related to the
37
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Consulting Agreement from Telesat of $8.8 million and
$6.0 million as of June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively.
In connection with the Telesat transaction, Loral has
indemnified Telesat for certain liabilities including Loral
Skynets tax liabilities arising prior to January 1,
2007. As of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 we had
recognized liabilities of approximately $6.9 million
representing our estimate of the probable outcome of these
matters. These liabilities are offset by tax deposit assets of
$7.0 million relating to periods prior to January 1,
2007. There can be no assurance, however, that the eventual
payments required by us will not exceed the liabilities
established.
In connection with an agreement entered into between SS/L and
ViaSat, Inc. (ViaSat) for the construction by SS/L
for ViaSat of a high capacity broadband satellite called
ViaSat-1, on January 11, 2008, we entered into certain
agreements, described below, pursuant to which we are investing
in the Canadian coverage portion of the ViaSat-1 satellite and
granting to Telesat an option to acquire our rights to the
Canadian payload. Michael B. Targoff and another Loral director
serve as members of the ViaSat Board of Directors.
A Beam Sharing Agreement between us and ViaSat provides for,
among other things, (i) the purchase by us of a portion of
the ViaSat-1 satellite payload providing coverage into Canada
(the Loral Payload) and (ii) payment by us of
15% of the actual costs of launch and associated services,
launch insurance and telemetry, tracking and control services
for the ViaSat-1 satellite. The aggregate cost to us for the
foregoing is estimated to be approximately $60 million.
SS/L commenced construction of the ViaSat-1 satellite in January
2008. We recorded sales to ViaSat under this contract of
$25 million and $12.4 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively and
$47 million and $19.5 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Lorals share of
costs incurred by SS/L on the ViaSat-1 satellite was
$18.6 million as of June 30, 2009 which is reflected
as satellite capacity under construction in property, plant and
equipment.
An Option Agreement between us and Telesat gives Telesat the
option to cause us to assign to Telesat our rights and
obligations with respect to the Loral Payload and all of our
rights and obligations under the Beam Sharing Agreement upon
payment by Telesat to us of (i) all amounts paid by us with
respect to the Loral Payload and pursuant to the Beam Sharing
Agreement on or prior to the date Telesat exercises its option
plus (ii) an option premium of between $6.0 million
and $13.0 million depending on the date of exercise.
Telesats option under the Option Agreement expires on
October 31, 2009 (the Expiration Date). In
consideration for the grant of the option, Telesat
(i) agreed in a Cooperation Agreement with us and ViaSat
(the Cooperation Agreement) to relinquish certain
rights Telesat has to the 115 degree W.L. orbital position (the
Orbital Slot) so as to make those rights available
to ViaSat pursuant to a license (the ViaSat License)
to be granted by Mansat Limited (Mansat) to ViaSat
and (ii) agreed to provide tracking, telemetry and control
services to ViaSat for the ViaSat-1 Satellite and to pay us all
of the recurring fees Telesat receives for providing such
services. We have agreed to reimburse ViaSat for fees due to
Mansat as well as certain other regulatory fees due under the
ViaSat License for the life of the ViaSat-1 Satellite. If
Telesat does not exercise its option on or prior to the
Expiration Date, then Telesat shall, at our request, transfer to
us Telesats remaining rights from Mansat with respect to
the Orbital Slot, and assign to us Telesats related rights
and obligations under the Cooperation Agreement.
Costs of satellite manufacturing for sales to related parties
were $41.5 million and $35.5 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively and
$81.6 million and $59.0 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
In connection with an agreement reached in 1999 and an overall
settlement reached in February 2005 with ChinaSat relating to
the delayed delivery of ChinaSat 8, SS/L has provided ChinaSat
with usage rights to two Ku-band transponders on Telesats
Telstar 10 for the life of such transponders (subject to certain
restoration rights) and to one Ku-band transponder on
Telesats Telstar 18 for the life of the Telstar 10
satellite plus two years, or the life of such transponder
(subject to certain restoration rights), whichever is shorter.
Pursuant to an amendment to the agreement executed in June 2009,
in lieu of rights to one of the Ku-band transponders on Telstar
10, ChinaSat has
38
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
rights to an equivalent amount of Ku-band capacity on Telstar 18
(the Alternative Capacity). The Alternative Capacity
may be utilized by ChinaSat until April 30, 2019 subject to
certain conditions. Under the agreement,
SS/L makes
monthly payments to Telesat for the transponders allocated to
ChinaSat. Effective with the termination of Telesats
leasehold interest in Telstar 10 in July 2009, SS/L will make
monthly payments with respect to capacity used by ChinaSat on
Telstar 10 directly to APT. As of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, our consolidated balance sheet included
a liability of $8.9 million and $9.8 million,
respectively, for the future use of these transponders. For the
six months ended June 30, 2009 we made payments of
$1.4 million to Telesat pursuant to the agreement.
XTAR
As described in Note 8 we own 56% of XTAR, a joint venture
between us and Hisdesat and account for our investment in XTAR
under the equity method of accounting. We constructed
XTARs satellite, which was successfully launched in
February 2005. XTAR and Loral have entered into a management
agreement whereby Loral provides general and specific services
of a technical, financial, and administrative nature to XTAR.
For the services provided by Loral, XTAR is charged a quarterly
management fee equal to 3.7% of XTARs quarterly gross
revenues. Amounts due to Loral under the management agreement as
of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were
$1.0 million and $1.3 million, respectively. During
the quarter ended March 31, 2008, Loral and XTAR agreed to
defer receivable amounts owed to Loral under this agreement and
XTAR has agreed that its excess cash balance (as defined) will
be applied at least quarterly towards repayment of receivables
owed to Loral, as well as to Hisdesat and Telesat. Our selling,
general and administrative expenses included offsetting income
to the extent of cash received under this agreement of
$0.3 million and $0.4 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively and
$0.8 million and $0.6 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
MHR
Fund Management LLC
Three of the managing principals of MHR, Mark H. Rachesky, Hal
Goldstein and Sai Devabhaktuni, are members of Lorals
board of directors. Prior to December 23, 2008, various
funds affiliated with MHR held all issued and outstanding shares
of Loral Series-1 Preferred Stock which was issued in February
2007. Pursuant to an order of the Delaware Chancery Court, on
December 23, 2008, we issued to the MHR Funds
9,505,673 shares of Non-Voting Common Stock, and all shares
of Loral Series-1 Preferred Stock (including all PIK dividends)
previously issued to the MHR Funds pursuant to the Securities
Purchase Agreement were cancelled.
Also pursuant to the Delaware Chancery Court Order, on
December 23, 2008, Loral and the MHR Funds entered into a
registration rights agreement which provides for registration
rights for the shares of Non-Voting Common Stock, in addition
and substantially similar to, the registration rights provided
for the shares of Voting Common Stock held by the MHR Funds. In
addition, in June 2009, Loral filed a shelf registration
statement covering shares of Voting Common Stock and Non-Voting
Common Stock held by the MHR Funds, which registration statement
was declared effective in July 2009. Various funds affiliated
with MHR held, as of June 30, 2009 and December 31,
2008, approximately 40.0% and 39.3%, respectively, of the
outstanding Voting Common stock and as of June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008 had a combined ownership of Voting and
Non-Voting Common Stock of Loral of 59.1% and 58.7%,
respectively. Information on dividends paid to the funds
affiliated with MHR, with respect to their holdings of the Loral
Series-1 Preferred Stock is as follows (in thousands, except
share amounts):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Dividends paid in the form of additional shares:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares
|
|
|
19,915
|
|
|
|
39,465
|
|
Amount
|
|
$
|
6.0
|
|
|
$
|
11.9
|
|
39
LORAL
SPACE & COMMUNICATIONS INC.
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Funds affiliated with MHR own preferred stock convertible
currently into approximately 18.6% of the common stock of
Protostar Ltd. (Protostar) assuming the conversion
of all issued and outstanding shares of preferred stock,
including the shares owned by the MHR funds. These MHR funds
also hold Protostar warrants exercisable upon the occurrence of
certain events. Upon conversion of such preferred stock and
warrants, such funds would own 7.8% of the common stock of
Protostar on a fully-diluted basis assuming the exercise or
conversion, as the case may be, of all currently outstanding
shares of preferred stock, convertible notes, options and
warrants, including the shares of preferred stock and warrants
owned by such funds. MHR has the right (which has not yet been
exercised) to nominate one of nine directors to Protostars
board of directors. The information set forth in this paragraph
is as of December 31, 2008 and the share percentages have
been calculated based on information provided by Protostar.
These MHR funds are also participants in Protostars
$200 million credit facility, dated March 19, 2008,
with an aggregate participation of $6.0 million. Protostar
acquired the ChinaSat 8 satellite from China Telecommunications
Broadcast Satellite Corporation and China National Postal and
Telecommunications Appliances Corporation under an agreement
reached in 2006, and, pursuant to a contract with Protostar
valued at $26.0 million, SS/L has modified the satellite to
meet Protostars needs. This satellite, renamed
Protostar I, was launched on July 8, 2008 from the
European Spaceport in Kourou, French Guiana. For the three and
six months ended June 30, 2008 we recorded sales to
Protostar of $4.6 million and $9.5 million,
respectively. As of June 30, 2009 accounts receivable from
Protostar were approximately $3 million. During July 2009,
Protostar filed for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the
Bankruptcy Code.
As of June 30, 2009, funds affiliated with MHR hold
$83.7 million in principal amount of Telesat
11% Senior Notes and $29.75 million in principal
amount of Telesat 12.5% Senior Subordinated Notes.
Other
Relationships
During the first quarter of 2008, the Company paid a termination
fee of $285,000 under a consulting agreement with Dean A.
Olmstead, who resigned from the Board of Directors on
January 10, 2008.
40
|
|
Item 2.
|
Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The following discussion and analysis should be read in
conjunction with our unaudited condensed consolidated financial
statements (the financial statements) included in
Item 1 and our latest Annual Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
INDEX
|
|
|
Topic
|
|
Location
|
|
Overview
|
|
Page 42
|
Future Outlook
|
|
Page 43
|
Consolidated Operating Results
|
|
Page 44
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources:
|
|
|
Loral
|
|
Page 55
|
Space Systems/Loral
|
|
Page 56
|
Telesat
|
|
Page 58
|
Contractual Obligations
|
|
Page 60
|
Statement of Cash Flows
|
|
Page 60
|
Affiliate Matters
|
|
Page 61
|
Commitments and Contingencies
|
|
Page 61
|
Other Matters
|
|
Page 61
|
Loral Space & Communications Inc., a Delaware
corporation, together with its subsidiaries is a leading
satellite communications company with substantial activities in
satellite manufacturing and investments in satellite-based
communications services. Loral was formed on June 24, 2005
to succeed to the business conducted by its predecessor
registrant, Loral Space & Communications Ltd.
(Old Loral), which emerged from chapter 11 of
the federal bankruptcy laws on November 21, 2005 (the
Effective Date).
The terms, Loral, the Company,
we, our and us, when used in
this report with respect to the period prior to the Effective
Date, are references to Old Loral, and when used with respect to
the period commencing on and after the Effective Date, are
references to Loral Space & Communications Inc. These
references include the subsidiaries of Old Loral or Loral
Space & Communications Inc., as the case may be,
unless otherwise indicated or the context otherwise requires.
The term Parent Company is a reference to Loral
Space & Communications Inc., excluding its
subsidiaries.
Disclosure
Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Except for the historical information contained in the
following discussion and analysis, the matters discussed below
are not historical facts, but are forward-looking
statements as that term is defined in the Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In addition, we or our
representatives have made and may continue to make
forward-looking statements, orally or in writing, in other
contexts. These forward-looking statements can be identified by
the use of words such as believes,
expects, plans, may,
will, would, could,
should, anticipates,
estimates, project, intend,
or outlook or other variations of these words. These
statements, including without limitation, those relating to
Telesat, are not guarantees of future performance and involve
risks and uncertainties that are difficult to predict or
quantify. Actual events or results may differ materially as a
result of a wide variety of factors and conditions, many of
which are beyond our control. For a detailed discussion of these
and other factors and conditions, please refer to the
Commitments and Contingencies section below and to our other
periodic reports filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). We operate in an industry sector
in which the value of securities may be volatile and may be
influenced by economic and other factors beyond our control. We
undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking
statements.
41
Overview
Businesses
Loral has two operating segments, satellite manufacturing and
satellite services. Loral participates in satellite services
operations principally through its investment in Telesat.
Satellite
Manufacturing
Space Systems/Loral, Inc. (SS/L), designs and
manufactures satellites, space systems and space system
components for commercial and government customers whose
applications include fixed satellite services (FSS),
direct-to-home
(DTH) broadcasting, mobile satellite services
(MSS), broadband data distribution, wireless
telephony, digital radio, digital mobile broadcasting, military
communications, weather monitoring and air traffic management.
Satellite manufacturers have high fixed costs relating primarily
to labor and overhead. Based on its current cost structure, we
estimate that SS/L covers its fixed costs, including
depreciation and amortization, with an average of four to five
satellite awards a year depending on the size, power, pricing
and complexity of the satellite. Cash flow in the satellite
manufacturing business tends to be uneven. It takes two to three
years to complete a satellite project and numerous assumptions
are built into the estimated costs. SS/Ls cash receipts
are tied to the achievement of contract milestones that depend
in part on the ability of its subcontractors to deliver on time.
In addition, the timing of satellite awards is difficult to
predict, contributing to the unevenness of revenue and making it
more challenging to align the workforce to the workflow.
While its requirement for ongoing capital investment to maintain
its current capacity is relatively low, over the past two years
SS/L has modified and expanded its manufacturing facilities to
accommodate an expanded backlog. SS/L can now accommodate as
many as nine to 13 satellite awards per year, depending on the
complexity and timing of the specific satellites, and can
accommodate the integration and test of 13 to 14 satellites at
any given time in its Palo Alto facility. The expansion has also
reduced the companys reliance on outside suppliers for
certain RF components and
sub-assemblies.
The satellite manufacturing industry is a knowledge-intensive
business, the success of which relies heavily on its
technological heritage and the skills of its workforce. The
breadth and depth of talent and experience resident in
SS/Ls workforce of approximately 2,400 personnel is
one of our key competitive resources.
Satellites are extraordinarily complex devices designed to
operate in the very hostile environment of space. This
complexity may lead to unanticipated costs during the design,
manufacture and testing of a satellite. SS/L establishes
provisions for costs based on historical experience and program
complexity to cover anticipated costs. As most of SS/Ls
contracts are fixed price, cost increases in excess of these
provisions reduce profitability and may result in losses to
SS/L, which may be material. Because the satellite manufacturing
industry is highly competitive, buyers have the advantage over
suppliers in negotiating pricing and terms and conditions
resulting in reduced margins and increased assumptions of risk
by manufacturers such as SS/L.
Satellite
Services
The satellite services business is capital intensive and the
build-out of a satellite fleet requires substantial time and
investment. Once these investments are made, however, the costs
to maintain and operate the fleet are relatively low with the
exception of in-orbit insurance. Upfront investments are earned
back through the leasing of transponders to customers over the
life of the satellite. After nearly 40 years of operation,
Telesat has established collaborative relationships with its
customers so annual receipts from the satellite services
business are fairly predictable with long term contracts and
high contract renewal rates.
Competition in the satellite services market has been intense in
recent years due to a number of factors, including transponder
over-capacity in certain geographic regions and increased
competition from fiber. This competition puts pressure on
prices, depending on market conditions in various geographic
regions and frequency bands.
42
At June 30, 2009, Telesat had 12 in-orbit satellites
(comprised of 11 owned satellites and one leased satellite,
Telstar 10). Its fleet of 11 owned in-orbit satellites had, as
of June 30, 2009, an average of approximately 56.1% service
life remaining, with an average service life remaining of
approximately 8.1 years. Nimiq 3, a leased satellite, was
removed from commercial service on June 1, 2009. In July,
2009, Telesat terminated its leasehold interest on Telstar 10.
Telesat currently has two additional satellites under
construction: Nimiq 5, which Telesat anticipates will be
operational in late 2009, and Telstar 14R/Estrela do Sul 2,
which Telesat anticipates will be operational in the second half
of 2011. Telesat has contracted for the sale of all of the
capacity on Nimiq 5 to Bell TV for 15 years or such later
date as the customer may request.
Future
Outlook
Critical success factors for SS/L include maintaining its
reputation for reliability, quality and superior customer
service. These factors are vital to securing new customers and
retaining current ones. At the same time, we must continue to
contain costs and maximize efficiencies. SS/L is focused on
increasing bookings and backlog, while maintaining and improving
upon the cost efficiencies and process improvements realized
over the past several years. SS/L must continue to align its
direct workforce with the level of awards. Additionally,
long-term growth at SS/L generates working capital requirements,
primarily for the orbital component of the satellite contract
which is payable to SS/L over the life of the satellite.
As of July 31, 2009, SS/L has booked five satellite awards
for the year in addition to the seven satellites booked last
year. While we expect the replacement market to be reliable over
the next year, given the current credit crisis, potential
customers who are highly leveraged or in the development stage
may not be able to obtain the financing necessary to purchase
satellites. If SS/Ls satellite awards fall below, on
average, four to five awards per year, we expect that we will
reduce costs and capital expenditures to accommodate this lower
level of business. The timing of any reduced demand for
satellites is difficult to predict. It is therefore also
difficult to anticipate when to reduce costs and capital
expenditures to match any slowdown in business. A delay in
matching the timing of a reduction in business with a reduction
in expenditures would adversely affect our results of operations
and liquidity. In addition, in order to maintain its ability to
compete as one of the leading prime contractors for
technologically advanced space satellites, SS/L must
continuously retain the services of a core group of specialists
in a wide variety of disciplines for each phase of the design,
development, manufacture and testing of its products, thus
reducing SS/Ls flexibility to take action to reduce
workforce costs in the event of a slowdown or downturn in its
business.
Loral holds a 64% economic interest and a
331/3%
voting interest in Telesat, the worlds fourth largest
satellite operator with approximately $4.4 billion of
backlog as of June 30, 2009.
Telesat is committed to continuing to provide the strong
customer service and focus on innovation and technical expertise
that has allowed it to successfully build its business to date.
Building on its industry leading backlog and significant
contracted growth, Telesats focus is on taking disciplined
steps to grow the core business and sell newly launched and
existing in-orbit satellite capacity, and, in a disciplined
manner, use the strong cash flow generated by existing business,
contracted expansion satellites and cost savings to strengthen
the business.
On July 16, 2009 Telesat announced its decision to procure
a replacement for Telstar 14/Estrela do Sul at its current 63
degrees West orbital location. The new high powered Ku-band
satellite will be known as Telstar 14R in most service regions
and Estrela do Sul 2 in Brazil, and will have 58 transponder
equivalents (36 MHz). Telesat anticipates the new satellite
will be operational in the second half of 2011 in
time to assure continuity of service for customers of Telstar
14/ Estrela do Sul.
Telesat has selected SS/L as the manufacturer for Telstar 14R
and International Launch Services for the satellites
launch into geostationary orbit. Telstar 14R will have five
coverage beams: Brazil, the Continental United States
(including the Gulf of Mexico and northern Caribbean), the
Southern Cone of South America, the Andean region (including
Central America and southern Caribbean), and the North and
Mid-Atlantic Ocean. The satellites Atlantic beam will
expand on the coverage of the Atlantic Ocean Region capacity of
both Telstar 14 and Telstar 11N. Telstar 14R will utilize the
SS/L1300 platform, will have a 15 year mission life, and a
launch mass of approximately 5000 kg. Total spacecraft power
will be approximately 11 kilowatts. Telesat will have the
capability to switch amplifiers to different regions resulting
in flexibility to match satellite capacity to market need.
43
On July 9, 2009 Telesat completed the transfer of its
leasehold interests in Telstar 10 and related contracts to APT
Satellite Company for a total consideration of approximately
$69 million. As announced on June 1, 2009, Telstar 10
accounted for approximately 5% of Telesats revenue and
less than 1% of its contracted backlog. Telesat is still in
discussions regarding the potential sale of its interests in
another international satellite and related assets and business
which represent approximately 2% of Telesats revenues and
approximately 1% of its backlog as of June 30, 2009.
Subject to Telesats obligations under its financing
arrangements, proceeds from the sale of these assets would be
used to fund replacement satellites or repay debt. Any potential
transaction is subject to further due diligence and other
conditions, and Telesat cannot at this time assess the
probability of concluding any transaction under discussion or
any other sale of these assets or at what price these assets may
be sold.
Telesat believes its existing satellite fleet offers a strong
combination of existing backlog, contracted revenue growth (on
Nimiq 4 which started service in the fourth quarter of 2008, and
on the in-construction satellite Nimiq 5) and additional
capacity (on the existing satellites, Telstar 11N which started
service on March 31, 2009 and Telstar 14R which recently
commenced construction) that provides a solid foundation upon
which it will seek to grow its revenues and cash flows.
Telesat believes that it is well-positioned to serve its
customers and the markets in which it participates. Telesat
actively pursues opportunities to develop new satellites,
particularly in conjunction with current or prospective
customers, who will commit to a substantial amount of capacity
at the time the satellite construction contract is signed.
Although Telesat regularly pursues opportunities to develop new
satellites, it does not procure additional or replacement
satellites unless it believes there is a demonstrated need and a
sound business plan for such capacity.
The satellite industry is characterized by a relatively fixed
cost base that allows significant revenue growth with relatively
minimal increases in operating costs, particularly for sales of
satellite capacity. Thus, Telesat anticipates that it can
increase its revenue without proportional increases in operating
expenses, allowing for margin expansion. The fixed cost nature
of the business, combined with contracted revenue growth and
other growth opportunities is expected to produce growth in
operating income and cash flow.
For 2009, Telesat is focused on the execution of its business
plan to serve its customers and the markets in which it
participates, the sale of capacity on its existing satellites,
the continuing efforts to achieve operating efficiencies, and on
the completion and launch of its in-construction satellites
(Nimiq 5 and Telstar 14R).
We regularly explore and evaluate possible strategic
transactions and alliances. We also periodically engage in
discussions with satellite service providers, satellite
manufacturers and others regarding such matters, which may
include joint ventures and strategic relationships as well as
business combinations or the acquisition or disposition of
assets. In order to pursue certain of these opportunities, we
will require additional funds. There can be no assurance that we
will enter into additional strategic transactions or alliances,
nor do we know if we will be able to obtain the necessary
financing for these transactions on favorable terms, if at all.
In connection with the Telesat transaction, Loral has agreed
that, subject to certain exceptions described in Telesats
shareholders agreement, for so long as Loral has an interest in
Telesat, it will not compete in the business of leasing, selling
or otherwise furnishing fixed satellite service, broadcast
satellite service or audio and video broadcast direct to home
service using transponder capacity in the C-band, Ku-band and
Ka-band
(including in each case extended band) frequencies and the
business of providing
end-to-end
data solutions on networks comprised of earth terminals, space
segment, and, where appropriate, networking hubs.
Consolidated
Operating Results
See Critical Accounting Matters in our latest Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC and Note 2 to the financial statements.
Changes in Critical Accounting Policies There
have been no changes in our critical accounting policies during
the six months ended June 30, 2009.
Consolidated Operating Results The following
discussion of revenues and Adjusted EBITDA reflects the results
of our operating business segments for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008. The balance of the discussion
relates to our consolidated results, unless otherwise noted.
44
The common definition of EBITDA is Earnings Before
Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization. In
evaluating financial performance, we use revenues and operating
(loss) income before depreciation and amortization (including
amortization of stock based compensation) (Adjusted
EBITDA) as the measure of a segments profit or loss.
Adjusted EBITDA is equivalent to the common definition of EBITDA
before gain on litigation recovery, impairment of available for
sale securities, other expense and equity in net income (losses)
of affiliates.
Adjusted EBITDA allows us and investors to compare our operating
results with that of competitors exclusive of depreciation and
amortization, interest and investment income, interest expense,
gain on litigation recovery, impairment of available for sale
securities, other expense and equity in net income (losses) of
affiliates. Financial results of competitors in our industry
have significant variations that can result from timing of
capital expenditures, the amount of intangible assets recorded,
the differences in assets lives, the timing and amount of
investments, the effects of other income (expense), which are
typically for non-recurring transactions not related to the
on-going business, and effects of investments not directly
managed. The use of Adjusted EBITDA allows us and investors to
compare operating results exclusive of these items. Competitors
in our industry have significantly different capital structures.
The use of Adjusted EBITDA maintains comparability of
performance by excluding interest expense.
We believe the use of Adjusted EBITDA along with U.S. GAAP
financial measures enhances the understanding of our operating
results and is useful to us and investors in comparing
performance with competitors, estimating enterprise value and
making investment decisions. Adjusted EBITDA as used here may
not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by
competitors. We also use Adjusted EBITDA to evaluate operating
performance of our segments, to allocate resources and capital
to such segments, to measure performance for incentive
compensation programs and to evaluate future growth
opportunities. Adjusted EBITDA should be used in conjunction
with U.S. GAAP financial measures and is not presented as
an alternative to cash flow from operations as a measure of our
liquidity or as an alternative to net income as an indicator of
our operating performance.
Loral has two segments: Satellite Manufacturing and Satellite
Services. Our segment reporting data includes unconsolidated
affiliates that meet the reportable segment criteria of
SFAS No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an
Enterprise and Related Information. The satellite services
segment includes 100% of the results reported by Telesat.
Although we analyze Telesats revenue and expenses under
the satellite services segment, we eliminate its results in our
consolidated financial statements, where we report our 64% share
of Telesats results under the equity method of accounting.
The following reconciles Revenues and Adjusted EBITDA on a
segment basis to the information as reported in our financial
statements:
Revenues:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Satellite Manufacturing
|
|
$
|
275.8
|
|
|
$
|
210.2
|
|
|
$
|
492.3
|
|
|
$
|
430.0
|
|
Satellite Services
|
|
|
172.2
|
|
|
|
172.4
|
|
|
|
337.4
|
|
|
|
338.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment revenues
|
|
|
448.0
|
|
|
|
382.6
|
|
|
|
829.7
|
|
|
|
768.9
|
|
Eliminations(1)
|
|
|
(4.4
|
)
|
|
|
(2.1
|
)
|
|
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
|
(3.4
|
)
|
Affiliate
eliminations(2)
|
|
|
(172.2
|
)
|
|
|
(172.4
|
)
|
|
|
(337.4
|
)
|
|
|
(338.9
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues as
reported(3)
|
|
$
|
271.4
|
|
|
$
|
208.1
|
|
|
$
|
483.9
|
|
|
$
|
426.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite Manufacturing segment revenues increased by
$66 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009
as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008,
primarily as a result of increased revenues from new orders
received subsequent to June 30, 2008, partially offset by
reduced revenue from programs completed or nearing completion.
Satellite Services segment revenues were unchanged for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2008. An increase of $27 million due
primarily to revenues generated by the Nimiq 4 and Telstar 11N
satellites, which entered service subsequent to June 30,
2008 and increased revenues
45
from Anik F-3 was offset primarily by lower revenues from the
impact of U.S. dollar/Canadian dollar exchange rate changes
on Canadian dollar denominated revenues.
Satellite Manufacturing segment revenues increased by
$62 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily as
a result of increased revenues from new orders received
subsequent to June 30, 2008, partially offset by reduced
revenues from programs completed or nearing completion.
Satellite Services segment revenues decreased by $2 million
for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the
six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to a
$66 million decrease from the U.S. dollar/Canadian
dollar exchange rate change on Canadian dollar denominated
revenue, partially offset by $65 million of revenues
primarily generated by the Nimiq 4 and Telstar 11N satellites,
which entered service subsequent to June 30, 2008 and
increased revenues from Anik F-3.
Adjusted
EBITDA:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Satellite Manufacturing
|
|
$
|
12.1
|
|
|
$
|
10.2
|
|
|
$
|
22.5
|
|
|
$
|
14.9
|
|
Satellite Services
|
|
|
119.3
|
|
|
|
111.8
|
|
|
|
234.2
|
|
|
|
211.2
|
|
Corporate
expenses(4)
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
)
|
|
|
(10.7
|
)
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment Adjusted EBITDA before eliminations
|
|
|
125.1
|
|
|
|
120.5
|
|
|
|
246.0
|
|
|
|
219.8
|
|
Eliminations(1)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
|
|
(0.4
|
)
|
|
|
(1.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.6
|
)
|
Affiliate
eliminations(2)
|
|
|
(119.3
|
)
|
|
|
(105.6
|
)
|
|
|
(234.2
|
)
|
|
|
(205.0
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
14.5
|
|
|
$
|
10.7
|
|
|
$
|
14.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite Manufacturing segment Adjusted EBITDA increased
$2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009
compared with the three months ended June 30, 2008
primarily due to a reduction in research and development expense
of $5 million as a result of completion of a significant
project that was being performed in 2008, partially offset by a
$3 million increase in pension costs. Satellite Services
segment Adjusted EBITDA increased by $8 million for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the three
months ended June 30, 2008 primarily due to the
$27 million revenue increase described above and
$5 million of lower expenses in 2009, partially offset by
$19 million of foreign exchange rate impact and a
$6 million gain on recovery from a customer bankruptcy
recorded in 2008. Corporate expenses increased by
$5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as
compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008, primarily
due to a $4 million charge for deferred compensation
resulting from an increase in the fair value of our common stock
and a $1 million increase in legal costs.
Satellite Manufacturing segment Adjusted EBITDA increased
$8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
compared with the six months ended June 30, 2008 primarily
due to a reduction in research and development expense of
$5 million as a result of completion of a significant
project that was being performed in 2008 and an $8 million
improvement in margins due primarily to the higher sales volume,
partially offset by a decrease of $6 million due to
increased pension costs. Satellite Services segment Adjusted
EBITDA increased by $23 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 as compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2008 primarily due to the $65 million revenue
increase described above and $10 million of lower expenses
in 2009, partially offset by a $46 million exchange rate
impact and a $6 million gain on recovery from a customer
bankruptcy recorded in 2008. Corporate expenses increased by
$4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008, primarily
due to a $6 million increased charge for deferred
compensation resulting from an increase in the fair value of our
common stock, partially offset by a $1 million decrease in
legal costs.
46
Reconciliation
of Adjusted EBITDA to Net Income (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Adjusted EBITDA
|
|
$
|
5.2
|
|
|
$
|
14.5
|
|
|
$
|
10.7
|
|
|
$
|
14.2
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(12.9
|
)
|
|
|
(10.0
|
)
|
|
|
(23.9
|
)
|
|
|
(20.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating (loss) income
|
|
|
(7.7
|
)
|
|
|
4.5
|
|
|
|
(13.2
|
)
|
|
|
(6.3
|
)
|
Interest and investment income
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
1.9
|
|
|
|
3.6
|
|
|
|
8.3
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
1.2
|
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.7
|
)
|
Gain on litigation recovery
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58.3
|
|
Impairment of available for sale securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3.5
|
)
|
Other expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(0.2
|
)
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)
|
|
|
(0.3
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)
|
|
|
(11.6
|
)
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)
|
|
|
(13.4
|
)
|
Equity in net income (losses) of affiliates
|
|
|
85.3
|
|
|
|
2.9
|
|
|
|
79.6
|
|
|
|
(61.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
74.3
|
|
|
$
|
52.0
|
|
|
$
|
63.5
|
|
|
$
|
(19.3
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Represents the elimination of intercompany sales and
intercompany Adjusted EBITDA for satellites under construction
by SS/L for Loral. |
|
(2) |
|
Represents the elimination of amounts attributed to Telesat
whose results are reported under the equity method of accounting
in our consolidated statements of operations (see Note 8 to
the financial statements). |
|
(3) |
|
Includes revenues from affiliates of $16.6 million and
$29.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively and $40.8 million and
$48.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively. |
|
(4) |
|
Represents corporate expenses incurred in support of our
operations. |
Three
Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared With Three Months Ended
June 30, 2008
The following compares our consolidated results for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 as presented in our
financial statements:
Revenues
from Satellite Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from Satellite Manufacturing
|
|
$
|
276
|
|
|
$
|
210
|
|
|
|
31
|
%
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
150
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from Satellite Manufacturing as reported
|
|
$
|
271
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
|
30
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from Satellite Manufacturing before eliminations
increased by $66 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 as compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2008, primarily as a result of $106 million
of revenues from $1.6 billion of new orders received
subsequent to June 30, 2008, offset by $40 million of
reduced revenues from programs completed or nearing completion
which were awarded in earlier periods. Eliminations for the
three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 consist primarily
of revenues applicable to Lorals interest in a portion of
the payload of the ViaSat-1 satellite which is being constructed
by SS/L (See Note 17 to the financial statements). As a
result, revenues from Satellite Manufacturing as reported
increased $63 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2009 as compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2008.
47
Cost
of Satellite Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Satellite Manufacturing includes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Satellite Manufacturing before the following specific
identified charges
|
|
$
|
242
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
Depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
33
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of Satellite Manufacturing as reported
|
|
$
|
254
|
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
|
38
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Satellite Manufacturing as a% of Satellite Manufacturing
revenues as reported
|
|
|
94
|
%
|
|
|
88
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Satellite Manufacturing as reported increased
$70 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009
as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008. Cost
of Satellite Manufacturing before specific identified charges
shown above increased $67 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the three months ended
June 30, 2008, primarily due to the cost increase from
higher sales volume. Depreciation, amortization and stock-based
compensation expense increased $3 million, primarily as a
result of a 2 million increase in stock-based compensation
and a $1 million increase in amortization of fair value
adjustments.
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of revenues as reported
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
12
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by
$1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009 as
compared to the three months ended June 30, 2008. This was
due primarily to a reduction in research and development
expenses of $5 million, offset by a $4 million
increase for deferred compensation due to an increase in the
fair value of our common stock during the second quarter of 2009
and a $1 million increase in legal costs.
Gain
on Recovery from Customer Bankruptcy
During the three months ended June 30, 2008 we recorded
income of $6 million related to the distribution from a
bankruptcy claim against a former customer of Loral Skynet. The
receivable underlying the claim had been previously written off
or not recognized due to the customers bankruptcy.
Interest
and Investment Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Interest and investment income
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and investment income was unchanged for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the three months
ended June 30, 2008. A decrease of $0.9 million due to
a reduction in average investment balances of approximately
$50 million and a decrease in returns on our investments
was offset by an increase in orbital interest income.
48
Interest
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009
relates to reversal of interest expense previously recorded due
to the favorable resolution of a contingent liability.
Gain
on Litigation Recovery
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we recognized
a gain of $58 million related to a litigation recovery from
Rainbow DBS.
Impairment
of Available for Sale Securities
During the three months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded an
impairment charge of $3.5 million to reflect an
other-than-temporary
decline in the value of our investment in Globalstar Inc. common
stock.
Other
Expense
Other expense includes gains and losses on foreign currency
transactions.
Income
Tax Provision
During 2009 and 2008, we continued to maintain the 100%
valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets except
with regard to our deferred tax assets related to AMT credit
carryforwards. We will maintain the valuation allowance until
sufficient positive evidence exists to support its reversal. For
periods prior to January 1, 2009 any reduction to the
balance of the valuation allowance as of October 1, 2005
first reduced goodwill, then other intangible assets with any
excess treated as an increase to
paid-in-capital.
For the three months ended June 30, 2008 our valuation
allowance balance as of October 1, 2005 was reduced by
$0.6 million which was recorded as a reduction to goodwill.
With the adoption of SFAS 141(R) on January 1, 2009,
all future reversals of the valuation allowance balance as of
October 1, 2005 are recorded as a reduction to the income
tax provision.
For the three months ended June 30, 2009 we recorded an
income tax provision of $6.4 million on a pre-tax book loss
of $4.6 million, consisting primarily of a
$3.7 million provision to increase our liability for
uncertain tax positions and a $2.5 million provision based
upon the application of our expected effective tax rate for the
full year against the current period results. The provision to
increase our liability for uncertain tax positions included a
charge of $1.9 million for new state tax penalties enacted
into law during 2009 (see Note 11 to the financial
statements). The interim provision based on our expected
effective tax rate was attributable to the temporary suspension
of net operating loss deductions in California enacted with the
state budget in September 2008.
For the three months ended June 30, 2008 we recorded an
income tax provision of $11.6 million on pre-tax book
income of $60.8 million, which included a gain of
$58 million related to the litigation recovery from Rainbow
DBS. The provision of $11.6 million consisted primarily of
a $1.8 million provision to increase our liability for
uncertain tax positions and a provision of $9.3 million on
the gain related to the litigation recovery from Rainbow DBS.
49
Equity
in Net Income (Losses) of Affiliates
Equity in net income (losses) of affiliates consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Telesat
|
|
$
|
80.6
|
|
|
$
|
6.9
|
|
XTAR
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
|
(4.1
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
85.3
|
|
|
$
|
2.8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 our investment in Telesat had been
reduced to zero as a result of recording our proportionate
interest in Telesats losses. Equity in losses of
affiliates, other than the elimination of our profit on
transactions with such affiliates, is not recognized after the
carrying value of an investment, including advances and loans,
has been reduced to zero, unless guarantees or other funding
obligations exist. Equity in net income (losses) of affiliates
for the three months ended June 30, 2009 includes equity in
net losses of Telesat which were not recognized during the year
ended December 31, 2008 and the three months ended
March 31, 2009 as the carrying value of our investment in
Telesat had been reduced to zero during 2008.
Summary financial information for Telesat in accordance with
U.S. GAAP is as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
172.2
|
|
|
$
|
172.4
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(52.9
|
)
|
|
|
(66.7
|
)
|
Depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(55.6
|
)
|
|
|
(56.8
|
)
|
Operating income
|
|
|
63.7
|
|
|
|
48.9
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(54.4
|
)
|
|
|
(53.3
|
)
|
Other income
|
|
|
141.1
|
|
|
|
39.8
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
|
(20.3
|
)
|
Net income
|
|
|
141.9
|
|
|
|
15.1
|
|
Other income (expense) includes foreign exchange gains of
$237 million and $21 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively and (losses)
gains on financial instruments of $(93) million and
$18 million for the three months ended June 30, 2009
and 2008, respectively.
Telesats operating results are subject to fluctuations as
a result of exchange rate variations to the extent that
transactions are made in currencies other than Canadian dollars.
Telesats main currency exposures as of June 30, 2009
lie in its U.S. dollar denominated cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and debt
financing. The most significant impact of variations in the
exchange rate is on the U.S. dollar denominated debt
financing, which is due primarily in 2014.
A five percent change in the value of the Canadian dollar
against the U.S. dollar at June 30, 2009 would have
increased or decreased Telesats net income for the three
months ended June 30, 2009 by approximately
$147 million.
The following summarizes recent exchange rates that impact
Telesats results (Canadian$/US$):
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1.225
|
|
March 31, 2009
|
|
|
1.260
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
1.162
|
|
July 31, 2009
|
|
|
1.078
|
|
50
As discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements,
Lorals equity in net income or loss of Telesat is based on
our proportionate share of their results in accordance with
U.S. GAAP and in U.S. dollars. In determining our
equity in net income or loss of Telesat, Telesats net
income or loss has been proportionately adjusted to exclude the
amortization of the fair value adjustments applicable to its
acquisition of the Loral Skynet assets and liabilities. Our
equity in net income or loss of Telesat also reflects the
elimination of our profit, to the extent of our beneficial
interest, on satellites we are constructing for them.
See Note 8 to the financial statements for information
related to XTAR.
Six
Months Ended June 30, 2009 Compared With Six Months Ended
June 30, 2008
The following compares our consolidated results for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 as presented in our
financial statements:
Revenues
from Satellite Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from Satellite Manufacturing
|
|
$
|
492
|
|
|
$
|
430
|
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
Eliminations
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
167
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from Satellite Manufacturing as reported
|
|
$
|
484
|
|
|
$
|
427
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from Satellite Manufacturing before eliminations
increased $62 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 as compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2008, primarily as a result of $159 million
of revenues from $1.6 billion of new orders received
subsequent to June 30, 2008, partially offset by
$97 million of reduced revenues from programs completed or
nearing completion which were awarded in earlier periods.
Eliminations for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 consist primarily of revenues applicable to Lorals
interest in a portion of the payload of the ViaSat-1 satellite
which is being constructed by SS/L (See Note 17 to the
financial statements). As a result, revenues from Satellite
Manufacturing as reported increased by $57 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the six
months ended June 30, 2008.
Cost
of Satellite Manufacturing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Satellite Manufacturing includes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Satellite Manufacturing before the following specific
identified charges
|
|
$
|
429
|
|
|
$
|
374
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
|
29
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of Satellite Manufacturing as reported
|
|
$
|
451
|
|
|
$
|
391
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Satellite Manufacturing as a% of Satellite Manufacturing
revenues as reported
|
|
|
93
|
%
|
|
|
92
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of Satellite Manufacturing as reported increased
$60 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008. Cost of
Satellite Manufacturing before specific identified charges shown
above increased $55 million for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 as compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2008. This increase is primarily due to costs
associated with the increase in sales volume. Depreciation,
amortization and stock-based compensation expense increased
$5 million, primarily as a result of $2 million of
stock-based compensation, 2 million of amortization of fair
value adjustments and $1 million of depreciation due to
increased capital expenditures related to our facility expansion
which was substantially completed in 2008.
51
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
% Increase/
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
|
|
(4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of revenues as reported
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased by
$2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 as
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2008. This was
due primarily to a reduction in research and development
expenses of $5 million, a decrease of $1 million of
legal costs and decreased stock-based compensation of
$1 million, partially offset by a Corporate charge of
$6 million for deferred compensation due to an increase in
the fair value of our common stock during the first half of 2009.
Gain
on Recovery from Customer Bankruptcy
During the six months ended June 30, 2008 we recorded
income of $6 million related to the distribution from a
bankruptcy claim against a former customer of Loral Skynet. The
receivable underlying the claim had been previously written off
or not recognized due to the customers bankruptcy.
Interest
and Investment Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Interest and investment income
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and investment income decreased $4 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 as compared to the six
months ended June 30, 2008. This decrease includes
$3 million due to a reduction in average investment
balances of approximately $115 million and a decrease in
returns on our investments. There was also a decrease of
$2 million from accelerated amortization of fair value
adjustments resulting from the early payment of orbital
incentives by a customer in the first quarter of 2008, partially
offset by an increase of $1 million in orbital interest
income.
Interest
Expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008
related to interest on vendor financing which is no longer
outstanding in 2009.
Gain
on Litigation Recovery
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we recognized a
gain of $58 million related to a litigation recovery from
Rainbow DBS.
Impairment
of Available for Sale Securities
During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded an
impairment charge of $3.5 million to reflect an
other-than-temporary
decline in the value of our investment in Globalstar Inc. common
stock.
52
Other
Expense
Other expense includes gains and losses on foreign currency
transactions.
Income
Tax Provision
During 2009 and 2008, we continued to maintain the 100%
valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets except
with regard to our deferred tax assets related to AMT credit
carryforwards. We will maintain the valuation allowance until
sufficient positive evidence exists to support its reversal. For
periods prior to January 1, 2009 any reduction to the
balance of the valuation allowance as of October 1, 2005
first reduced goodwill, then other intangible assets with any
excess treated as an increase to
paid-in-capital.
For the six months ended June 30, 2008 our valuation
allowance balance as of October 1, 2005 was reduced by
$0.6 million which was recorded as a reduction to goodwill.
With the adoption of SFAS 141(R) on January 1, 2009,
all future reversals of the valuation allowance balance as of
October 1, 2005 are recorded as a reduction to the income
tax provision.
For the six months ended June 30, 2009 we recorded an
income tax provision of $6.4 million on a pre-tax book loss
of $9.7 million, consisting primarily of a
$5.4 million provision to increase our liability for
uncertain tax positions and a $1.5 million provision based
upon the application of our expected effective tax rate for the
full year against the current period results. The provision to
increase our liability for uncertain tax positions included a
charge of $1.9 million for new state tax penalties enacted
into law during 2009 (see Note 11 to the financial
statements). The interim provision based on our expected
effective tax rate was attributable to the temporary suspension
of net operating loss deductions in California enacted with the
state budget in September 2008.
For the six months ended June 30, 2008 we recorded an
income tax provision of $13.4 million on pre-tax book
income of $55.9 million, which included a gain of
$58 million related to the litigation recovery from Rainbow
DBS. The provision of $13.4 million consisted primarily of
a $3.3 million provision to increase our liability for
uncertain tax positions and a provision of $9.3 million on
the gain related to the litigation recovery from Rainbow DBS.
Equity
in Net Income (Losses) of Affiliates
Equity in net income (losses) of affiliates consists of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Telesat
|
|
$
|
78.3
|
|
|
$
|
(53.3
|
)
|
XTAR
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
(8.4
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
79.6
|
|
|
$
|
(61.7
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2008 our investment in Telesat had been
reduced to zero as a result of recording our proportionate
interest in Telesats losses. Equity in losses of
affiliates, other than the elimination of our profit on
transactions with such affiliates, is not recognized after the
carrying value of an investment, including advances and loans,
has been reduced to zero, unless guarantees or other funding
obligations exist. Equity in net income (losses) of affiliates
for the six months ended June 30, 2009 includes equity in
net losses of Telesat which were not recognized during the year
ended December 31, 2008 and the three months ended
March 31, 2009 as the carrying value of our investment in
Telesat had been reduced to zero during 2008.
53
Summary financial information for Telesat in accordance with
U.S. GAAP is as follows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
Ended June 30,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Statement of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues
|
|
$
|
337.4
|
|
|
$
|
338.9
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(103.2
|
)
|
|
|
(133.9
|
)
|
Depreciation, amortization and stock-based compensation
|
|
|
(106.1
|
)
|
|
|
(115.2
|
)
|
Operating income
|
|
|
128.1
|
|
|
|
89.8
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(108.5
|
)
|
|
|
(115.5
|
)
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
106.6
|
|
|
|
(48.5
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
(15.4
|
)
|
|
|
(3.3
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
110.7
|
|
|
|
(77.5
|
)
|
Other income (expense) includes foreign exchange gains (losses)
of $156 million and $(102) million for the six months
ended June 30, 2009 and (losses) gains on financial
instruments of $(47) million and $50 million for the
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Telesats operating results are subject to fluctuations as
a result of exchange rate variations to the extent that
transactions are made in currencies other than Canadian dollars.
Telesats main currency exposures as of June 30, 2009,
lie in its U.S. dollar denominated cash and cash
equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and debt
financing. The most significant impact of variations in the
exchange rate is on the U.S. dollar denominated debt
financing, which is due primarily in 2014.
A five percent change in the value of the Canadian dollar
against the U.S. dollar at June 30, 2009 would have
increased or decreased Telesats net income for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 by approximately
$147 million.
The following summarizes recent exchange rates that impact
Telesats results (Canadian$/US$):
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1.225
|
|
June 30, 2009
|
|
|
1.162
|
|
July 31, 2009
|
|
|
1.078
|
|
As discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements,
Lorals equity in net income or loss of Telesat is based on
our proportionate share of their results in accordance with
U.S. GAAP and in U.S. dollars. In determining our
equity in net income or loss of Telesat, Telesats net
income or loss has been proportionately adjusted to exclude the
amortization of the fair value adjustments applicable to its
acquisition of the Loral Skynet assets and liabilities. Our
equity in net income or loss of Telesat also reflects the
elimination of our profit, to the extent of our beneficial
interest, on satellites we are constructing for them.
See Note 8 to the financial statements for information
related to XTAR.
Backlog
Backlog as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, was
as follows (in millions):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Satellite Manufacturing
|
|
$
|
1,762
|
|
|
$
|
1,381
|
|
Satellite Services
|
|
|
4,372
|
|
|
|
4,207
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total backlog before eliminations
|
|
|
6,134
|
|
|
|
5,588
|
|
Satellite Manufacturing eliminations
|
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Satellite Services eliminations
|
|
|
(4,372
|
)
|
|
|
(4,207
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total backlog
|
|
$
|
1,745
|
|
|
$
|
1,356
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
54
The increase in Satellite Manufacturing backlog as of
June 30, 2009 compared with December 31, 2008 was the
result of awards during the period for the construction of five
satellites, partially offset by revenues recognized. The
increase in Satellite Services backlog as of June 30, 2009
compared with December 31, 2008 was the result of exchange
rate changes and additional bookings, partially offset by
revenues recognized during the period.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Loral
As described above, the Companys principal assets are
ownership of 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of
SS/L and a 64% non-controlling economic interest in Telesat. In
addition, the Company has a 56% non-controlling economic
interest in XTAR. SS/Ls operations are consolidated in the
Companys financial statements while the operations of
Telesat and XTAR are not consolidated but presented using the
equity method of accounting. The Parent Company has no debt,
while SS/L has a $100 million revolving credit facility
under which no amounts are outstanding as of July 31, 2009.
Telesat has third party debt with financial institutions and
XTAR has debt to its LLC member, Hisdesat, Lorals joint
venture partner in XTAR. The Parent Company has provided a
guarantee of the SS/L debt but has not provided a guarantee for
the Telesat or XTAR debt. Cash is maintained at the Parent
Company, SS/L, Telesat and at XTAR to support the operating
needs of each respective entity. The ability of SS/L and Telesat
to pay dividends and management fees in cash to the Parent
Company is governed by applicable covenants relating to the debt
at each of those entities and in the case of Telesat and XTAR by
their respective shareholder agreements.
Cash and
Available Credit
At June 30, 2009, the Company had $104 million of cash
and cash equivalents and $6 million of restricted cash.
During the first six months of 2009, SS/L repaid the
$55 million of loans that were outstanding at
December 31, 2008 and did not borrow any new funds under
its $100 million revolving credit agreement. In April 2009,
SS/L issued a $3 million letter of credit under the credit
agreement bringing the amount of letters of credit outstanding
at June 30, 2009 to $7.9 million. The restricted cash
balance at June 30, 2009 did not change from that
outstanding at December 31, 2008. Our cash position, net of
outstanding debt, improved approximately $41 million from
December 31, 2008 to June 30, 2009 primarily as a
result of receipt of satellite contract milestone payments.
Liquidity
At the Parent Company, we expect that our cash and cash
equivalents will be sufficient to fund our projected
expenditures for the next twelve months. During the first six
months of 2009, the Parent Company funded approximately
$8.3 million for its portion of the construction and launch
of the ViaSat 1 satellite, $8.8 million of attorneys
fees in the shareholder derivative litigation, an additional
$4.5 million investment in XTAR as well as Parent Company
operating costs. During the next twelve months, the Parent
Company will continue to fund its operating costs, estimated to
be approximately $18 million, net of management fees to be
received in cash, as well as its portion of the construction and
launch of the ViaSat 1 satellite estimated to be
$17.1 million if Telesat does not exercise its option to
acquire our rights to the Canadian coverage portion of the
satellite. The Company has also received a request for
indemnification from its directors who are affiliated with MHR
for legal costs incurred by them in connection with the
shareholder derivative litigation that may or may not be
recoverable from insurance. We believe that SS/L, Telesat and
XTAR will have sufficient liquidity to fund their respective
operations and capital requirements and make all required debt
service payments as discussed below.
We currently invest our cash in several liquid money market
funds which reduces the exposure of a default at one fund. These
money market funds currently include only Prime AAA funds. The
Company sold its Treasury and Government money market funds
during the second quarter of 2009 to increase its yields given
the stability in the money market funds. We do not currently
hold any investments in auction rate securities or enhanced
money market funds.
In addition to our cash on hand we believe we have the ability
to access the capital markets for debt or equity at the Parent
Company. Given the uncertain financial environment, however,
there can be no assurance that the Company would be able to
obtain such financing on acceptable terms.
55
Space
Systems/Loral
Cash
During the first six months of 2009, SS/L repaid the
$55 million of debt outstanding under the SS/L Credit
Agreement at December 31, 2008. For the next twelve months,
SS/L anticipates that, although its cash position will decline
from current levels as it continues to build its orbital
receivable balance, it will have more than sufficient funds and
credit availability to meet its cash flow requirements. Capital
expenditures at SS/L are forecasted to be approximately
$47 million in 2009. SS/L expects capital expenditures to
normalize at $25 million to $30 million in future
years. SS/L maintains the flexibility to defer or reduce a
significant portion of its ongoing capital expenditures if the
volume of ongoing business is materially reduced or as other
circumstances may require.
Available
Credit and Liquidity
The SS/L Credit Agreement, which is guaranteed pursuant to a
Parent Guarantee Agreement, provides SS/L with a
$100 million revolving credit facility, including a
$50 million letter of credit
sub-limit.
The SS/L Credit Agreement matures on October 16, 2011. SS/L
currently has borrowing availability of approximately
$92 million under the facility given that approximately
$8 million of letters of credit are outstanding as of
August 1, 2009. A $3 million letter of credit
scheduled to expire on July 31, 2009 was extended to
October 15, 2009. SS/L anticipates that over the next
twelve months it will be in compliance with all the covenants of
the SS/L Credit Agreement and have full availability of the
$100 million.
SS/L agreed to make up to $100 million in loans to a
customer, Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. (Sirius), in
the Amended and Restated Customer Credit Agreement (the
Sirius Credit Agreement) relating to the
construction of the satellites known as FM-5 and FM-6. The FM-5
satellite was successfully launched on June 30, 2009 and
Sirius is no longer able to borrow against the FM-5 satellite.
If Sirius were to meet the existing conditions to draw on the
Sirius Credit Agreement for FM-6 it would have the ability to
finance approximately $21 million against future milestone
payments. Drawings for milestone payments on FM-6 would be
secured by a first-priority security interest in the FM-6
Satellite. As of July 31, 2009, Sirius is current with all
of its required milestone payments to SS/L and no loans were
outstanding under the Sirius Credit Agreement.
Absent unforeseen circumstances, over the coming year SS/L
believes that with its cash on hand, cash flow from operations
and availability under the SS/L Credit Agreement, it has
adequate liquidity to operate its business and finance loans
contemplated by the Sirius Credit Agreement.
Satellite construction contracts often include provisions for
orbital incentives where a portion of the contract value
(typically about 10%) is received over the 12 to 15 year
life of the satellite. Receipt of these orbital incentives is
contingent upon performance of the satellite in accordance with
contractual specifications. As of June 30, 2009, SS/L has
orbital receivables of approximately $209 million, of which
$4 million is in current assets. Approximately
$76 million of these receivables are related to satellites
launched as of July 31, 2009 and $133 million are
related to satellites that are under construction as of
July 31, 2009. SS/L expects its orbital receivable asset
will increase by more than $60 million through
June 30, 2010.
Current economic conditions could affect the ability of
customers to make payments, including orbital incentive
payments, under satellite construction contracts with SS/L.
Though most of SS/Ls customers are substantial
corporations for which creditworthiness is generally high, SS/L
has certain customers which are either highly leveraged or are
in the developmental stage and are not fully funded. Customers
that are facing near-term maturities on their existing debt also
have elevated credit risk under current market conditions. There
can be no assurances that these customers will not delay
contract payments to, or seek financial relief from, SS/L. If
customers fall behind or are unable to meet their payment
obligations, SS/Ls liquidity will be adversely affected.
Approximately $104 million is anticipated to be received
from these customers over the next 12 months.
As of July 31, 2009, SS/L had past due receivables included
in contracts in process in the aggregate amount of approximately
$6 million, from ICO, a highly-leveraged customer with an
SS/L-built satellite in orbit. ICO has filed for bankruptcy
under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. In addition, ICO
has future payment obligations to SS/L
56
which total in excess of $26 million of which approximately
$12 million (including $9 million of orbital
incentives) is included in long-term receivables. Based on
discussions with ICO, we expect this customer to assume our
contract, although there is no assurance ICO will do so. SS/L
also had a past due receivable in the aggregate amount of
approximately $3 million from Protostar, another
highly-leveraged customer with an SS/L-built satellite in orbit,
which amount was included in contracts in process. Protostar is
also experiencing significant financial difficulties and has
filed for bankruptcy protection. To date, Protostar has not
assumed this contract, and there can be no assurance that this
customer will assume SS/Ls contract in bankruptcy.
SS/Ls contracts with both ICO and Protostar, however,
require that SS/L provide orbital anomaly and troubleshooting
support for the life of the satellites. SS/Ls expertise is
also critical in the event that either of these customers
desires to move its satellite to a different orbital location.
SS/L believes that such technical support is essential to
maximize the life and performance of these in-orbit satellites,
which are critical to the operations of these customers or the
value of their principal assets and no other company can provide
this support on a practical basis. Accordingly, SS/L believes
these customers (or their successors if they undergo
reorganization or purchasers of their satellites) are highly
likely to assume such contracts and fulfill their payment
obligations to SS/L.
There can be no assurance that SS/Ls customers,
particularly those that SS/L has identified as having elevated
credit risk, will not default on their obligations to SS/L in
the future and that such defaults will not materially and
adversely affect SS/L and Loral. In the event of an uncured
contract default by the customer, SS/Ls construction
contracts generally provide SS/L with significant rights even if
their customers (or successors) have paid significant amounts
under the contract. These rights typically include the right to
stop work on the satellite and the right to terminate the
contract for default. In the latter case, SS/L would generally
have the right to retain, and sell to other customers, the
satellite or satellite components that are under construction.
However, the exercise of such rights could be impeded by the
assertion by customers of defenses and counterclaims, including
claims of breach of performance obligations on the part of SS/L,
and our recovery could be reduced by the lack of a ready resale
market for the affected satellites or their components. In
either case, our liquidity could be adversely affected pending
the resolution of such customer disputes.
SS/Ls contracts contain detailed and complex technical
specifications to which the satellite must be built.
SS/Ls
contracts also impose a variety of other contractual obligations
on SS/L, including the requirement to deliver the satellite by
an agreed upon date, subject to negotiated allowances. If SS/L
is unable to meet its contract obligations, including
significant deviations from technical specifications or
delivering the satellite beyond the agreed upon date in a
contract, the customer would have the right to terminate the
contract for contractor default. If a contract is terminated for
contractor default, SS/L would be required to refund the
payments made to SS/L to date, which could be significant. In
such circumstances, SS/L would, however, keep the satellite
under construction and be able to recoup some of its losses
through the resale of the satellite or its components to another
customer. It has been SS/Ls experience that, because the
satellite is generally critical to the execution of a
customers operations and business plan, customers will
usually accept a satellite with minor deviations from
specifications or renegotiate a revised delivery date with SS/L
as opposed to terminating the contract for contractor default
and losing the satellite. Nonetheless, the obligation to return
all funds paid to SS/L in the later stages of a contract, due to
termination for contractor default, would have a material
adverse effect on SS/Ls liquidity.
SS/L currently has a
contract-in-process
with an estimated delivery date later than the contractually
specified date after which the customer can terminate the
contract for default. The customer is an established operator
for which SS/L has built a sizable portion of its fleet and
which requires the satellite for the continued operation of its
business. SS/L and the customer are continuing to perform under
the contract, and, although there can be no assurance, the
Company believes that the customer will take delivery of this
satellite and will not seek to terminate the contract for
default. If the customer should successfully terminate the
contract for default, the customer would be entitled to a full
refund of its payments and liquidated damages, which through
July 31, 2009 totaled approximately $137 million, plus
re-procurement costs and interest and SS/L would own the
satellite.
As of July 31, 2009, SS/L has booked five satellite awards
for the year in addition to the seven satellites booked last
year, resulting in a sizable backlog of $1.8 billion. If
SS/Ls satellite awards fall below, on average, four to
five awards per year, SS/L will be required to reduce costs and
capital expenditures to accommodate this lower level of
activity. The timing of any reduced demand for satellites is
difficult to predict. It is, therefore, difficult to anticipate
when to reduce costs and capital expenditures to match any
slowdown in business. A delay in matching the timing of
57
a reduction in business with a reduction in expenditures could
adversely affect our liquidity. We believe that SS/Ls
current backlog, existing liquidity and availability under the
SS/L Credit Agreement are sufficient to finance SS/L, even if we
receive fewer than four to five awards over the next twelve
months. If SS/L were to experience a shortage of orders below
the four to five awards per year for multiple years, SS/L could
require additional financing, the amount and timing of which
would depend on the magnitude of the order shortfall coupled
with the timing of a reduction in costs and capital
expenditures. There can be no assurances that the SS/L could
obtain such financing on favorable terms, if at all.
Telesat
Cash and
Available Credit
As of June 30, 2009, Telesat had CAD 81 million of
cash and short-term investments as well as approximately CAD
153 million of borrowing availability under its Revolving
Facility. Telesat believes that cash and short-term investments
as of June 30, 2009, net cash provided by operating
activities, cash flow from customer prepayments, and drawings on
the available lines of credit under the Credit Facility (as
defined below) will be adequate to meet its expected cash
requirement for activities in the normal course of business,
including interest and required principal payments on debt as
well as planned capital expenditures for the next twelve months.
Telesat has adopted what it believes are conservative policies
relating to and governing the investment of its surplus cash.
The investment policy does not permit Telesat to engage in
speculative or leveraged transactions, nor does it permit
Telesat to hold or issue financial instruments for trading
purposes. The investment policy was designed to preserve capital
and safeguard principal, to meet all liquidity requirements of
Telesat and to provide a competitive rate of return. The
investment policy addresses dealer qualifications, lists
approved securities, establishes minimum acceptable credit
ratings, sets concentration limits, defines a maturity
structure, requires all firms to safe keep securities, requires
certain mandatory reporting activity and discusses review of the
portfolio. Telesat operates its investment program under the
guidelines of its investment policy.
Liquidity
A large portion of Telesats annual cash receipts are
reasonably predictable because they are primarily derived from
an existing backlog of long-term customer contracts and high
contract renewal rates. Telesat believes its cash flow from
operations will be sufficient to provide for its capital
requirements and to fund its interest and debt payment
obligations for the next 12 months. Cash required for the
construction of the Nimiq 5 and Telstar 14R satellites will be
funded from some or all of the following: cash and short-term
investments, cash flow from operations, proceeds from the sale
of assets, cash flow from customer prepayments or through
borrowings on available lines of credit under the Credit
Facility.
Telesat maintains a target of approximately CAD 25 million
in cash and cash equivalents within its subsidiary operating
entities for the management of its liquidity. Telesats
intention is to maintain at least this level of cash and cash
equivalents to assist with the
day-to-day
management of its cash flows.
58
Debt
Telesat has entered into agreements with a syndicate of banks to
provide Telesat with a series of term loan facilities
denominated in Canadian dollars and U.S. dollars, and a
revolving facility (collectively, the Senior Secured
Credit Facilities) as outlined below. In addition, Telesat
has issued two tranches of notes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Currency
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In CAD millions)
|
|
|
Senior Secured Credit Facilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revolving facility
|
|
October 31, 2012
|
|
CAD or USD
equivalent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canadian term loan facility
|
|
October 31, 2012
|
|
CAD
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
195
|
|
U.S. term loan facility
|
|
October 31, 2014
|
|
USD
|
|
|
1,972
|
|
|
|
2,087
|
|
U.S. term loan II facility
|
|
October 31, 2014
|
|
USD
|
|
|
169
|
|
|
|
179
|
|
Senior notes
|
|
November 1, 2015
|
|
USD
|
|
|
777
|
|
|
|
819
|
|
Senior subordinated notes
|
|
November 1, 2017
|
|
USD
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
256
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CAD
|
|
|
3,351
|
|
|
|
3,536
|
|
Current portion
|
|
|
|
CAD
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long term portion
|
|
|
|
CAD
|
|
|
3,330
|
|
|
|
3,513
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The outstanding debt balances above, with the exception of the
revolving credit facility and the Canadian term loan, are
presented net of related debt issuance costs. The debt issuance
costs in the amount of CAD 7 million related to the
revolving credit facility and the Canadian term loan are
included in other assets and are amortized to interest expense
on a straight-line basis. All other debt issuance costs are
amortized to interest expense using the effective interest
method.
The Senior Secured Credit Facilities are secured by
substantially all of Telesats assets. Each tranche of the
Senior Secured Credit Facilities is subject to mandatory
principal repayment requirements. Borrowings under the Senior
Secured Credit Facilities bear interest at a base interest rate
plus margins of 275 300 basis points. The
required repayments on the Canadian term loan facility will be
CAD 10 million for the year ended December 31, 2009.
For the US term loan facilities, required repayments in 2009 are
1/4 of 1% of the initial aggregate principal amount which is
approximately $5 million per quarter. Telesat is required
to comply with certain covenants which are usual and customary
for highly leveraged transactions, including financial
reporting, maintenance of certain financial covenant ratios for
leverage and interest coverage, a requirement to maintain
minimum levels of satellite insurance, restrictions on capital
expenditures, a restriction on fundamental business changes or
the creation of subsidiaries, restrictions on investments,
restrictions on dividend payments, restrictions on the
incurrence of additional debt, restrictions on asset
dispositions and restrictions on transactions with affiliates.
The Senior notes bear interest at an annual rate of 11.0% and
are due November 1, 2015. The Senior notes include
covenants or terms that restrict Telesats ability to,
among other things, (i) incur additional indebtedness,
(ii) incur liens, (iii) pay dividends or make certain
other restricted payments, investments or acquisitions,
(iv) enter into certain transactions with affiliates,
(v) modify or cancel the Companys satellite
insurance, (vi) effect mergers with another entity, and
(vii) redeem the Senior notes prior to May 1, 2012, in
each case subject to exceptions provided in the Senior notes
indenture.
The Senior subordinated notes bear interest at a rate of 12.5%
and are due November 1, 2017. The Senior subordinated notes
include covenants or terms that restrict Telesats ability
to, among other things, (i) incur additional indebtedness,
(ii) incur liens, (iii) pay dividends or make certain
other restricted payments, investments or acquisitions,
(iv) enter into certain transactions with affiliates,
(v) modify or cancel the Companys satellite
insurance, (vi) effect mergers with another entity, and
(vii) redeem the Senior subordinated notes prior to
May 1, 2013, in each case subject to exceptions provided in
the Senior subordinated notes indenture.
59
Interest
Expense
An estimate of the interest expense on the Facilities is based
upon assumptions of LIBOR and Bankers Acceptance rates and the
applicable margin for the Senior Secured Credit Facilities.
Telesats estimated interest expense for 2009 is
approximately CAD 288 million.
Derivatives
Telesat has used interest rate and currency derivatives to hedge
its exposure to changes in interest rates and changes in foreign
exchange rates.
Telesat uses forward contracts to hedge foreign currency risk on
anticipated transactions, mainly related to the construction of
satellites. At June 30, 2009, Telesat had CAD
22.0 million of outstanding foreign exchange contracts
which require the Company to pay Canadian dollars to receive
$21.2 million for future capital expenditures. At
June 30, 2009, the fair value of these derivative contract
liabilities was an unrealized gain of CAD 2.6 million, and
at December 31, 2008 there was a CAD 10.8 million
unrealized gain. These forward contracts are due between
July 1, 2009 and December 1, 2009.
Telesat has also entered into a cross currency basis swap to
hedge the foreign currency risk on a portion of its US dollar
denominated debt. Telesat uses natural hedges to manage the
foreign exchange risk on operating cash flows. At June 30,
2009, the Company had a cross currency basis swap of CAD
1,205.9 million which requires the Company to pay Canadian
dollars to receive $1,038.2 million. At June 30, 2009,
the fair value of this derivative contract was an unrealized
loss of CAD 34.1 million. This non-cash loss will remain
unrealized until the contract is settled. This contract is due
on October 31, 2014. At December 31, 2008 there was an
unrealized gain of CAD 8.8 million.
Interest
rate risk
Telesat is exposed to interest rate risk on its cash and cash
equivalents and its long term debt which is primarily variable
rate financing. Changes in the interest rates could impact the
amount of interest Telesat is required to pay. Telesat uses
interest rate swaps to hedge the interest rate risk related to
variable rate debt financing. At June 30, 2009, the fair
value of these derivative contract liabilities was an unrealized
loss of CAD 61.4 million, and at December 31, 2008
there was an unrealized loss of CAD 82.3 million. This
non-cash loss will remain unrealized until the contracts are
settled. These contracts are due between January 31, 2010
and November 30, 2011.
Capital
Expenditures
Telesat has entered into contracts for the construction of
Telstar T14R (targeted for launch in 2011), Nimiq 5 (targeted
for launch in 2009), and Telstar 11N (launched in February
2009). These expenditures will be funded from some or all of the
following: cash and short-term investments, cash flow from
operations, proceeds from the sale of assets, cash flow from
customer prepayments or through borrowings on available lines of
credit under the Credit Facility.
Contractual
Obligations
There have not been any significant changes to the contractual
obligations as previously disclosed in our latest Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
filed with the SEC other than the repayment of the
$55 million outstanding borrowing under the SS/L Credit
Agreement at December 31, 2008. As of June 30, 2009,
we have recorded liabilities for uncertain income tax positions
under FIN 48 in the amount of $114 million. We do not
expect to make any significant payments regarding such
FIN 48 liabilities during the next 12 months.
Statement
of Cash Flows
Net
Cash Provided by (Used In) Operating Activities
Cash provided from operations was $67 million for the six
months ended June 30, 2009 compared to cash used in
operations of $157 million in the same period last year.
60
The major driver of this change was cash provided from program
related assets
(contracts-in-process,
inventories, long-term receivables and customer advances) of
$43 million in the current period compared to cash used by
program related assets of $100 million last year.
Contracts-in-process
provided $2 million this year but consumed $82 million
last year. Last years high consumption of cash represented
advance spending on programs that customers would reimburse us
for in the future. Inventories provided $11 million this
year compared to consuming $8 million last year,
representing a
build-up of
inventories last year for expected program awards and the
subsequent use of the inventories. Long-term receivables used
cash of $3 million this year compared to providing cash of
$19 million last year as a result of an early payment of
orbital incentives by a customer in the first quarter of last
year. Customer advances provided $32 million this year
compared to using $29 million last year. Last years
use represented program spending for customer advances
previously received compared to receiving additional advances
this year.
Other factors that contributed to the change were: Accounts
payable, accrued expenses and other current liabilities used
cash of $3 million this year compared to using cash of
$27 million last year which includes a post Telesat closing
final adjustment payment to PSP of $9 million. We received
an income tax refund of $15 million in 2009, as compared to
having made tax payments of $34 million last year.
Net
Cash Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 was $26 million resulting from capital
expenditures of $22 million and an additional investment of
$4.5 million in XTAR, representing our 56% share of an
$8 million capital call.
Net cash used in investing activities for the six months ended
June 30, 2008 was comprised of $23 million of capital
expenditures.
Net
Cash Used in Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities for the six months ended
June 30, 2009 was $55 million resulting from repayment
of borrowings under the SS/L Credit Agreement. There was no cash
used in (provided by) financing activities for the six months
ended June 30, 2008.
Affiliate
Matters
Loral has investments in Telesat and XTAR that are accounted for
under the equity method of accounting. See Note 8 to the
financial statements for further information on affiliate
matters.
Commitments
and Contingencies
Our business and operations are subject to a number of
significant risks; see Item 1A Risk Factors and
also Note 14 to the financial statements, Commitments and
Contingencies.
Other
Matters
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
There are no accounting pronouncements that have been issued but
not yet adopted that we believe will have a significant impact
on our financial statements.
|
|
Item 3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
Foreign
Currency
Loral
We, in the normal course of business, are subject to the risks
associated with fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates.
To limit this foreign exchange rate exposure, the Company seeks
to denominate its contracts in U.S. dollars. If we are
unable to enter into a contract in U.S. dollars, we review
our foreign exchange exposure and,
61
where appropriate derivatives are used to minimize the risk of
foreign exchange rate fluctuations to operating results and cash
flows. We do not use derivative instruments for trading or
speculative purposes.
As of June 30, 2009, SS/L had the following amounts
denominated in Japanese Yen and EUROs (which have been
translated into U.S. dollars based on the June 30,
2009 exchange rates) that were unhedged:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign Currency
|
|
|
U.S.$
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Future revenues Japanese Yen
|
|
¥
|
157.5
|
|
|
$
|
1.6
|
|
Future expenditures Japanese Yen
|
|
¥
|
3,678.4
|
|
|
$
|
38.5
|
|
Customer advances Japanese Yen
|
|
¥
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
Future expenditures EUROs
|
|
|
4.7
|
|
|
$
|
6.6
|
|
Derivatives
On July 9, 2008, SS/L was awarded a satellite contract
denominated in EUROs and entered into a series of foreign
exchange forward contracts with maturities through 2011 to hedge
the associated foreign currency exchange risk. These foreign
exchange forward contracts have been designated as cash flow
hedges of future Euro denominated receivables.
The maturity of foreign currency exchange contracts held as of
June 30, 2009 is consistent with the contractual or
expected timing of the transactions being hedged, principally
receipt of customer payments under long-term contracts. These
foreign exchange contracts mature as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To Sell
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
At
|
|
|
|
Euro
|
|
|
Contract
|
|
|
Market
|
|
Maturity
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
Rate
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
31.6
|
|
|
$
|
48.1
|
|
|
$
|
44.5
|
|
2010
|
|
|
19.2
|
|
|
|
29.4
|
|
|
|
27.0
|
|
2011
|
|
|
23.5
|
|
|
|
35.7
|
|
|
|
33.2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
74.3
|
|
|
$
|
113.2
|
|
|
$
|
104.7
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of the use of derivative instruments, the Company is
exposed to the risk that counterparties to derivative contracts
will fail to meet their contractual obligations. To mitigate the
counterparty credit risk, the Company has a policy of only
entering into contracts with carefully selected major financial
institutions based upon their credit ratings and other factors.
The aggregate fair value of derivative instruments in net asset
positions as of June 30, 2009 was $8.5 million
($5.5 million in other current assets and $3.0 million
in other assets). This amount represents the maximum exposure to
loss at June 30, 2009 as a result of the counterparties
failing to perform as contracted.
Telesat
Telesats operating results are subject to fluctuations as
a result of exchange rate variations to the extent that
transactions are made in currencies other than Canadian dollars.
Approximately 45% of Telesats revenues for the six months
ended June 30, 2009, certain of its expenses and a
substantial portion of its indebtedness and capital expenditures
are denominated in US dollars. The most significant impact of
variations in the exchange rate is on the US dollar denominated
debt financing. A five percent change in the value of the
Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar at June 30,
2009 would have increased or decreased Telesats net income
for the six months ended June 30, 2009 by approximately
$147 million.
See Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Telesat Derivatives
for a discussion of derivatives at Telesat.
62
Interest
As of June 30, 2009, the Company has no long-term debt or
any exposure to changes in interest rates with respect thereto.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company held marketable securities
consisting of 984,173 shares of Globalstar Inc. common
stock with a fair value of approximately $1.0 million. The
value of these Globalstar Inc. common shares is subject to
market fluctuations in the stock price. During the second
quarter of 2008, management determined that there has been an
other than temporary impairment in the fair values of Globalstar
Inc. stock obtained in the sale of GdB. Accordingly, an
impairment charge of $3.5 million was included in our
condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and
six month ended June 30, 2008. During the first six months
of 2009, the Company did not invest in any other marketable
securities. The Company invested its available cash in money
market funds during this period.
Telesat is exposed to interest rate risk on its cash and cash
equivalents and its long term debt which is primarily variable
rate financing. Changes in the interest rates could impact the
amount of interest Telesat is required to pay. See
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Telesat Derivatives
for a discussion of derivatives at Telesat.
|
|
Item 4.
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
|
(a) Disclosure controls and
procedures. Our chief executive officer and our
chief financial officer, after evaluating the effectiveness of
our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined
in
Rules 13a-15(e)
and
15d-15(e) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
Exchange Act)) as of June 30, 2009, have
concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective and designed to ensure that information relating to
Loral and its consolidated subsidiaries required to be disclosed
in our filings under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.
(b) Internal control over financial
reporting. There were no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in the Securities
and Exchange Act of 1934
Rules 13a-15(f)
and
15-d-15(f))
during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially
affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our
internal control over financial reporting.
PART II.
OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item 1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
We discuss certain legal proceedings pending against the Company
in the notes to the financial statements and refer the reader to
that discussion for important information concerning those legal
proceedings, including the basis for such actions and relief
sought. See Note 14 to the financial statements of this
Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q
for this discussion.
Item 1A. Risk
Factors
Our business and operations are subject to a significant number
of risks. The most significant of these risks are summarized in,
and the readers attention is directed to, the section of
our Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 in Item 1A.
Risk Factors. There are no material changes to those risk
factors except as set forth in Note 14 (Commitments and
Contingencies) of the financial statements contained in this
report, and the reader is specifically directed to that section.
The risks described in our Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
as updated by this report, are not the only risks facing us.
Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or
that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially
adversely affect our business, financial condition
and/or
operating results.
63
|
|
Item 4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
We held our Annual Meeting of Stockholders on May 19, 2009.
At the meeting, the following proposals were acted upon:
(1) Three Class III nominees for the Board of
Directors were elected to three-year terms, expiring in 2012.
The votes were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year Term
|
|
Name
|
|
For
|
|
|
Withheld
|
|
|
Expires
|
|
|
Dr. Mark H. Rachesky
|
|
|
14,792,336
|
|
|
|
4,609,539
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Mr. Sai Devabhaktuni
|
|
|
15,096,832
|
|
|
|
4,305,043
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Mr. Hal Goldstein
|
|
|
15,098,132
|
|
|
|
4,303,743
|
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Directors whose term of office continued after the
Companys 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and who were
not subject to election at the 2009 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders are John D. Harkey, Jr., Arthur L. Simon and
John P. Stenbit, whose terms expire in 2010, and Michael B.
Targoff, whose term expires in 2011.
(2) Ratification of the amendment and restatement of the
Companys Restated Certificate of Incorporation accepted
for filing on December 23, 2008 by the Secretary of State
of the State of Delaware pursuant to an order of the Court of
Chancery of the State of Delaware, which eliminated
previously-designated series of Preferred Stock and authorized a
new series of Non-Voting Common Stock. The votes were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
|
16,087,634
|
|
Against
|
|
|
19,810
|
|
Abstain
|
|
|
1,278
|
|
(3) Further amendment of the Companys Amended and
Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of
authorized shares of Voting Common Stock to
50,000,000 shares and the number of authorized shares of
Non-Voting Common Stock to 20,000,000 shares and to
eliminate the prohibition on the issuance of nonvoting equity
securities. The votes were as follows:
Common
Stock
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
|
15,377,255
|
|
Against
|
|
|
728,880
|
|
Abstain
|
|
|
2,587
|
|
Non-Voting
Common Stock
All 9,505,673 shares of Non-Voting Common Stock were voted
in favor of this proposal.
(4) Ratification of the appointment of Deloitte &
Touche LLP as the Companys independent registered public
accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2009. The
votes were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
For
|
|
|
19,305,805
|
|
Against
|
|
|
94,899
|
|
Abstain
|
|
|
1,171
|
|
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:
Exhibit 2.1 Restated Certificate of
Incorporation of Loral Space & Communications Inc.
dated May 19, 2009 (incorporated by reference form the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 20, 2009).
Exhibit 31.1 Certification of Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
64
Exhibit 31.2 Certification of Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.1 Certification of Chief Executive
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 1350, as adopted
pursuant to § 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 99.1 Letter Agreement, dated as of
June 30, 2009, by and among Loral Space &
Communications Inc, MHR Capital Partners Master Account LP, MHR
Capital Partners (100) LP, MHR Institutional Partners LP,
MHRA LP, MHRM LP, MHR Institutional Partners II LP, MHR
Institutional Partners IIA LP and MHR Institutional
Partners III LP. (incorporated by reference form the
Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on June 30, 2009).
65
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on
its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
Registrant
Loral Space &
Communications Inc.
Harvey B. Rein
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
and Registrants Authorized Officer
Date: August 10, 2009
66
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 2.1
|
|
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Loral Space &
Communications Inc. dated May 19, 2009 (incorporated by
reference form the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on May 20, 2009).
|
Exhibit 31.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
Exhibit 31.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to § 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
Exhibit 32.1
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
Exhibit 32.2
|
|
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to
18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
Exhibit 99.1
|
|
|
|
Letter Agreement, dated as of June 30, 2009, by and among
Loral Space & Communications Inc, MHR Capital Partners
Master Account LP, MHR Capital Partners (100) LP, MHR
Institutional Partners LP, MHRA LP, MHRM LP, MHR Institutional
Partners II LP, MHR Institutional Partners IIA LP and MHR
Institutional Partners III LP. (incorporated by reference
form the Companys Current Report on
Form 8-K
filed on June 30, 2009).
|
67