e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
Quarterly report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended January 31, 2010
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from
to .
Commission File Number 0-21180
INTUIT INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State of incorporation)
|
|
77-0034661
(IRS employer identification no.) |
2700 Coast Avenue, Mountain View, CA 94043
(Address of principal executive offices)
(650) 944-6000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports); and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of large accelerated filer,
accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
|
|
|
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date. 313,918,834 shares of Common Stock, $0.01 par value, were
outstanding at February 22, 2010.
INTUIT INC.
FORM 10-Q
INDEX
Intuit, the Intuit logo, QuickBooks, TurboTax, ProSeries, Lacerte, Digital Insight and Quicken,
among others, are registered trademarks and/or registered service marks of Intuit Inc., or one of
its subsidiaries, in the United States and other countries. Other parties marks are the property
of their respective owners.
2
PART I
ITEM 1
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
INTUIT INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
(In millions, except per share amounts; unaudited) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product |
|
$ |
422 |
|
|
$ |
433 |
|
|
$ |
627 |
|
|
$ |
651 |
|
Service and other |
|
|
415 |
|
|
|
340 |
|
|
|
684 |
|
|
|
584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
773 |
|
|
|
1,311 |
|
|
|
1,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Costs and expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenue |
|
|
48 |
|
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
88 |
|
Cost of service and other revenue |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
200 |
|
Amortization of purchased intangible assets |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
277 |
|
|
|
271 |
|
|
|
457 |
|
|
|
451 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
274 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
134 |
|
Acquisition-related charges |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
698 |
|
|
|
662 |
|
|
|
1,272 |
|
|
|
1,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income from continuing operations |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(15 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(24 |
) |
Interest and other income, net |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
before income taxes |
|
|
126 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Income tax provision (benefit) |
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(17 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share from
continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Basic net income (loss) per share from
discontinued operations |
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in basic per share calculations |
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share from
continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share from
discontinued operations |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in diluted per share calculations |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
3
INTUIT INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
(In millions; unaudited) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
$ |
679 |
|
Investments |
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
468 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
Income taxes receivable |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
67 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
Current assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets before funds held for customers |
|
|
1,603 |
|
|
|
1,696 |
|
Funds held for customers |
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,916 |
|
|
|
1,968 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
518 |
|
|
|
527 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
1,853 |
|
|
|
1,754 |
|
Purchased intangible assets, net |
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
291 |
|
Long-term deferred income taxes |
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
87 |
|
|
|
77 |
|
Long-term assets of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
4,778 |
|
|
$ |
4,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
159 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
Accrued compensation and related liabilities |
|
|
135 |
|
|
|
171 |
|
Deferred revenue |
|
|
511 |
|
|
|
360 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
234 |
|
|
|
153 |
|
Current liabilities of discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities before customer fund deposits |
|
|
1,041 |
|
|
|
812 |
|
Customer fund deposits |
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,354 |
|
|
|
1,084 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
Other long-term obligations |
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
2,522 |
|
|
|
2,269 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock and additional paid-in capital |
|
|
2,599 |
|
|
|
2,547 |
|
Treasury stock, at cost |
|
|
(3,220 |
) |
|
|
(2,846 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
2,869 |
|
|
|
2,849 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
2,256 |
|
|
|
2,557 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
4,778 |
|
|
$ |
4,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
4
INTUIT INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
(In millions, except shares in |
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
thousands; unaudited) |
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Income |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2009 |
|
|
322,766 |
|
|
$ |
2,547 |
|
|
$ |
(2,846 |
) |
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
2,849 |
|
|
$ |
2,557 |
|
Components of comprehensive net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46 |
|
|
|
46 |
|
Other comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47 |
|
Issuance of common stock under
employee stock plans |
|
|
6,851 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
150 |
|
Restricted stock units released, net of taxes |
|
|
1,430 |
|
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(24 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
Stock repurchases under stock
repurchase programs |
|
|
(18,814 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(550 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(550 |
) |
Tax benefit from employee stock
option transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2010 |
|
|
312,233 |
|
|
$ |
2,599 |
|
|
$ |
(3,220 |
) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
2,869 |
|
|
$ |
2,256 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares of |
|
|
Additional |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
(In millions, except shares in |
|
Common |
|
|
Paid-In |
|
|
Treasury |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Stockholders |
|
thousands; unaudited) |
|
Stock |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Stock |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2008 |
|
|
322,600 |
|
|
$ |
2,415 |
|
|
$ |
(2,787 |
) |
|
$ |
8 |
|
|
$ |
2,444 |
|
|
$ |
2,080 |
|
Components of comprehensive net income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive net income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
|
Issuance of common stock under
employee stock plans |
|
|
4,911 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
95 |
|
Restricted stock units released, net of taxes |
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Stock repurchases under stock
repurchase programs |
|
|
(7,383 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(200 |
) |
Tax benefit from employee stock
option transactions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
57 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2009 |
|
|
321,047 |
|
|
$ |
2,459 |
|
|
$ |
(2,861 |
) |
|
$ |
(8 |
) |
|
$ |
2,446 |
|
|
$ |
2,036 |
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes.
5
INTUIT INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
(In millions; unaudited) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by (used in) operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
32 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Pre-tax gain on sale of IRES (1) |
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(58 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
44 |
|
Tax benefit from share-based compensation plans |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
(4 |
) |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation plans |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
Other |
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total adjustments |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(318 |
) |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
(331 |
) |
|
|
(317 |
) |
Prepaid expenses, income taxes receivable and other assets |
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(114 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
(7 |
) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Accrued compensation and related liabilities |
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
Deferred revenue |
|
|
180 |
|
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
156 |
|
|
|
122 |
|
Income taxes payable |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(13 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total changes in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
73 |
|
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(84 |
) |
|
|
(325 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities (1) |
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
143 |
|
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
(57 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of available-for-sale debt securities |
|
|
(162 |
) |
|
|
(31 |
) |
|
|
(550 |
) |
|
|
(67 |
) |
Sales of available-for-sale debt securities |
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
418 |
|
|
|
264 |
|
Maturities of available-for-sale debt securities |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
24 |
|
Net change in funds held for customers money
market funds and other cash equivalents |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(50 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
|
|
(117 |
) |
Net change in customer fund deposits |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
(317 |
) |
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(141 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from divestiture of business |
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
122 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash
provided by (used in) investing activities |
|
|
(54 |
) |
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock under stock plans |
|
|
85 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
150 |
|
|
|
95 |
|
Tax payments
related to issuance of restricted stock units |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(250 |
) |
|
|
(35 |
) |
|
|
(550 |
) |
|
|
(200 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from share-based compensation plans |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in financing activities |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(416 |
) |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
170 |
|
|
|
(342 |
) |
|
|
(74 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
169 |
|
|
|
679 |
|
|
|
413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
$ |
339 |
|
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
$ |
339 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Because the operating cash flows of our Intuit Real Estate Solutions (IRES) discontinued
operations were not material for any period presented, we have not segregated them from continuing
operations on these statements of cash flows. We have
presented the effect of the gain on disposal of IRES on the statement of cash flows for the three
and six months ended January 31, 2010. See Note 6. |
See accompanying notes.
6
INTUIT INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
1. Description of Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Description of Business
Intuit Inc. provides business and financial management solutions for small and medium-sized
businesses, consumers, accounting professionals and financial institutions. Our flagship products
and services, including QuickBooks, Quicken and TurboTax, simplify small business management and
payroll processing, personal finance, and tax preparation and filing. ProSeries and Lacerte are
Intuits tax preparation offerings for professional accountants. Our financial institutions
division, anchored by Digital Insight, provides outsourced online banking services to banks and
credit unions. Incorporated in 1984 and headquartered in Mountain View, California, we sell our
products and services primarily in the United States.
Basis of Presentation
These condensed consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Intuit and
its wholly owned subsidiaries. We have eliminated all significant intercompany balances and
transactions in consolidation. In July 2009 we acquired PayCycle, Inc. for a total purchase price
of approximately $169 million and in November 2009 we acquired Mint Software Inc. for total
consideration of approximately $170 million. Accordingly, we have included the results of
operations for PayCycle and Mint in our consolidated results of operations from their respective
dates of acquisition. In January 2010 we sold our Intuit Real Estate Solutions (IRES) business.
Accordingly, we have reclassified our financial statements for all periods prior to the sale to
reflect IRES as discontinued operations. Unless noted otherwise, discussions in these notes pertain
to our continuing operations.
These condensed consolidated financial statements also include the financial position, results of
operations and cash flows of Superior Bankcard Services, LLC (SBS), an entity that acquired
merchant accounts for our Payment Solutions business. We were allocated 51% of the earnings and
losses of this entity and 100% of the losses in excess of the noncontrolling interest capital
balances. We therefore eliminated the portion of the SBS financial results that pertained to the
noncontrolling interests in our statements of operations and on our balance sheets. The amounts
eliminated were not material for any period presented. On December 7, 2009 we purchased all of the
noncontrolling members interests in SBS for a total price of approximately $9 million, net of loan
repayments. See Note 8.
We have included all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring items, that we considered
necessary for a fair presentation of our financial results for the interim periods presented. These
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes should be read
together with the audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009. Results for the three and six months ended January
31, 2010 do not necessarily indicate the results we expect for the fiscal year ending July 31, 2010
or any other future period.
We have reclassified certain amounts previously reported in our financial statements to conform to
the current presentation, including amounts related to reportable segments and discontinued
operations.
Seasonality
Our QuickBooks, Consumer Tax and Accounting Professionals businesses are highly seasonal. Revenue
from our QuickBooks software products tends to be highest during our second and third fiscal
quarters. Sales of income tax preparation products and services are heavily concentrated in the
period from November through April. Seasonal patterns mean that our total net revenue is usually
highest during our second quarter ending January 31 and third quarter ending April 30. We typically
report losses in our first quarter ending October 31 and fourth quarter ending July 31, when
revenue from our tax businesses is minimal while operating expenses continue at relatively
consistent levels.
Significant Accounting Policies
We describe our significant accounting policies in Note 1 to the financial statements in Item 8 of
our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009. On August 1, 2009 we
adopted the Financial Accounting
7
Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) as
the sole source for authoritative guidance. On August 1, 2009 we also adopted certain authoritative
guidance on fair value measurements for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities and on
business combinations that affected our significant accounting policies. See Fair Value of
Nonfinancial Assets and Nonfinancial Liabilities and Business Combinations below. There have
been no other changes to our significant accounting policies during fiscal 2010.
Fair Value of Nonfinancial Assets and Nonfinancial Liabilities
We describe our accounting policies for the valuation of goodwill, purchased intangible assets and
other long-lived assets in Goodwill, Purchased Intangible Assets and Other Long-Lived Assets in
Note 1 to the financial statements in Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended July 31, 2009. On August 1, 2009 we adopted the provisions of the authoritative guidance on
fair value measurements for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that we do not
recognize or disclose at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually). These include
reporting units measured at fair value in a goodwill impairment test, other nonfinancial assets or
liabilities measured at fair value for impairment testing, and nonfinancial assets acquired and
liabilities assumed in a business combination. In accordance with this guidance, we define fair
value as the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability
in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants on the measurement date. As a result, we now estimate the fair values
of these assets and liabilities from the perspective of a market participant rather than from an
entity-specific perspective. In addition, we consider and use all valuation methods that are
appropriate in estimating the fair value of these assets and liabilities. See Note 2, Assets and
Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis, for information on the impact of our
adoption of this guidance.
Business Combinations
On August 1, 2009 we adopted the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations. The
acquisition method of accounting requires us to use significant estimates and assumptions,
including fair value estimates, as of the business combination date and to refine those estimates
as necessary during the measurement period (defined as the period, not to exceed one year, in which
we may adjust the provisional amounts recognized for a business combination) in a manner that is
generally similar to the previous purchase method of accounting.
Under the acquisition method of accounting we recognize separately from goodwill the identifiable
assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interests in an acquiree,
generally at the acquisition date fair value. We measure goodwill as of the acquisition date as the
excess of consideration transferred, which we also measure at fair value, over the net of the
acquisition date amounts of the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Costs that we
incur to complete the business combination such as investment banking, legal and other professional
fees are not considered part of consideration and we charge them to general and administrative
expense as they are incurred. Under the acquisition method we also account for acquired company
restructuring activities that we initiate separately from the business combination.
Should the initial accounting for a business combination be incomplete by the end of a reporting
period that falls within the measurement period, we report provisional amounts in our financial
statements. During the measurement period, we adjust the provisional amounts recognized at the
acquisition date to reflect new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as
of the acquisition date that, if known, would have affected the measurement of the amounts
recognized as of that date and we record those adjustments to our financial statements. We apply
those measurement period adjustments that we determine to be significant retrospectively to
comparative information in our financial statements, including adjustments to depreciation and
amortization expense.
Under the acquisition method of accounting for business combinations, if we identify changes
to deferred tax asset valuation allowances or liabilities related to uncertain tax positions during
the measurement period and they relate to new information obtained about facts and circumstances
that existed as of the acquisition date, those changes are considered a measurement period
adjustment and we record the offset to goodwill. We record all other changes to deferred tax asset
valuation allowances and liabilities related to uncertain tax positions in current period income
tax expense. This accounting applies to all of our acquisitions regardless of acquisition date.
Other Accounting Pronouncements Adopted in the Current Period
On August 1, 2009 we adopted authoritative guidance for the determination of the useful lives of
intangible assets. This guidance amends the factors that should be considered in developing renewal
or extension assumptions used to
8
determine the useful lives of recognized intangible assets. Our
adoption of this guidance had no impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
On August 1, 2009 we adopted authoritative guidance for the accounting and reporting of
noncontrolling interests in consolidated entities and for the deconsolidation of those entities. As
a result of our adoption of this guidance, we retrospectively reclassified the balances for the
noncontrolling interest in SBS to stockholders equity for all periods presented. These balances
were not significant. The expense that we recorded for the noncontrolling interest in SBSs income
was not significant compared with our consolidated financial results for any period presented and
we have therefore included it in interest and other income, net in our statements of operations.
On November 1, 2009 we adopted authoritative guidance for measuring liabilities at fair value. This
guidance amends the factors that should be considered in fair value measurements of liabilities
when a quoted price in an active market is not available. Our adoption of this guidance had no
impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Computation of Net Income (Loss) Per Share
We compute basic net income or loss per share using the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. We compute diluted net income per share using the weighted average
number of common shares and dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period.
Dilutive potential common shares include shares issuable upon the exercise of stock options and
upon the vesting of restricted stock units (RSUs) under the treasury stock method.
We include stock options with combined exercise prices, unrecognized compensation expense and tax
benefits that are less than the average market price for our common stock, and RSUs with
unrecognized compensation expense and tax benefits that are less than the average market price for
our common stock, in the calculation of diluted net income per share. We exclude stock options with
combined exercise prices, unrecognized compensation expense and tax benefits that are greater than
the average market price for our common stock, and RSUs with unrecognized compensation expense and
tax benefits that are greater than the average market price for our common stock, from the
calculation of diluted net income per share because their effect is anti-dilutive. Under the
treasury stock method, the amount that must be paid to exercise stock options, the amount of
compensation expense for future service that we have not yet recognized for stock options and RSUs,
and the amount of tax benefits that will be recorded in additional paid-in capital when the awards
become deductible are assumed to be used to repurchase shares.
In loss periods, basic net loss per share and diluted net loss per share are identical since the
effect of potential common shares is anti-dilutive and therefore excluded.
9
The following table presents the composition of shares used in the computation of basic and diluted
net income per share for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income from continuing operations |
|
$ |
80 |
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
|
$ |
11 |
|
|
$ |
34 |
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in basic per share amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in diluted per share amounts: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
|
314 |
|
|
|
321 |
|
|
|
317 |
|
|
|
322 |
|
Dilutive common equivalent shares from
stock options and restricted stock awards |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dilutive weighted average common shares
outstanding |
|
|
323 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
326 |
|
|
|
329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted net income (loss) per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share from
continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.04 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Basic net income (loss) per share from
discontinued operations |
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.15 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share from
continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
Diluted net income (loss) per share from
discontinued operations |
|
|
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average stock options and
restricted stock units excluded from
calculation due to anti-dilutive effect |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significant Customers
No customer accounted for 10% or more of total net revenue in the three or six months ended January
31, 2010 or 2009. Due to the seasonality of our business, at January 31, 2010 the account of one
retail customer represented approximately 16% of total accounts receivable and the account of
another retail customer represented approximately 10% of total accounts receivable. No customer
accounted for 10% or more of total accounts receivable at July 31, 2009.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
ASU 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605) Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements a
Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force
In October 2009 the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-13, Revenue Recognition
(Topic 605) Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements a Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues
Task Force. This
update provides amendments to the criteria in ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, for separating
consideration
10
in multiple-deliverable arrangements by establishing a selling price hierarchy. The
selling price used for each deliverable will be based on vendor-specific objective evidence (VSOE)
if available, third-party evidence if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price if neither
VSOE nor third-party evidence is available. ASU 2009-13 also eliminates the residual method of
allocation and requires that arrangement consideration be allocated at the inception of the
arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method. ASU 2009-13 is effective
for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after
June 15, 2010, which means that it will be effective for our fiscal year beginning August 1, 2010.
We are in the process of evaluating this update and therefore have not yet determined the impact
that adoption of ASU 2009-13 will have on our financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) Improving Disclosures about
Fair Value Measurements
In January 2010 the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic
820) Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This update amends the disclosure
requirements about fair value measurements in ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurements and
Disclosures. ASU 2010-06 requires more robust disclosures about the different classes of assets
and liabilities measured at fair value, the valuation techniques and inputs used, the activity in
Level 3 fair value measurements, and the transfers between Levels 1, 2, and 3. ASU 2010-06 is
effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, which means
that it will be effective for our third fiscal quarter beginning February 1, 2010. We expect that
the adoption of this update will have no significant impact on our financial position, results of
operations or cash flows.
2. Fair Value Measurements
The authoritative guidance defines fair value as the price that would be received from the sale of
an asset or paid to transfer a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset
or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. We
measure and disclose the fair value of certain assets and liabilities on a recurring basis and
other assets and liabilities on a non-recurring basis, as described below. The authoritative
guidance establishes a three-level hierarchy for disclosure that is based on the extent and level
of judgment used to estimate the fair value of assets and liabilities.
|
|
|
Level 1 uses unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities. |
|
|
|
|
Level 2 uses inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are either
directly or indirectly observable through correlation with market data. These include
quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for
identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and inputs to
valuation models or other pricing methodologies that do not require significant judgment
because the inputs used in the model, such as interest rates and volatility, can be
corroborated by readily observable market data. |
|
|
|
|
Level 3 uses one or more significant inputs that are unobservable and supported by
little or no market activity, and that reflect the use of significant management judgment.
Level 3 assets and liabilities include those whose fair value measurements are determined
using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar valuation techniques,
and significant management judgment or estimation. |
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis
Our cash equivalents, available-for-sale debt securities and long-term debt are measured at fair
value on a recurring basis. We have classified these assets and liabilities in accordance with the
fair value hierarchy. In instances where the inputs used to measure the fair value of an asset or
liability fall into more than one level of the fair value hierarchy, we have classified them based
on the lowest level input that is significant to the determination of the fair value.
11
The following table presents financial assets and financial liabilities that we measured at fair
value on a recurring basis at the date indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2010 |
|
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
(In millions) |
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents (1) |
|
$ |
439 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
439 |
|
|
$ |
893 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
893 |
|
Available-for-sale debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
448 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
448 |
|
Corporate notes (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44 |
|
U.S. agency securities (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
|
U.S. treasuries (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal auction rate
securities (3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
439 |
|
|
$ |
630 |
|
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
$ |
1,285 |
|
|
$ |
893 |
|
|
$ |
517 |
|
|
$ |
245 |
|
|
$ |
1,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt (4) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,070 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,070 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,001 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
1,001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Included in cash and cash equivalents and funds held for customers on our balance
sheets at January 31, 2010 and July 31, 2009. |
|
(2) |
|
$482 million included in investments and $148 million included in funds held for
customers on our balance sheet at January 31, 2010. $517 million included in investments on
our balance sheet at July 31, 2009. |
|
(3) |
|
$127 million included in investments and $89 million included in long-term investments
on our balance sheet at January 31, 2010. $151 million included in investments and $94
million included in long-term investments on our balance sheet at July 31, 2009. |
|
(4) |
|
Carrying value on our balance sheets at January 31, 2010 and July 31, 2009 was $998
million. See Note 8. |
The following table presents a reconciliation of financial assets that we measure at fair
value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the periods
indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months |
|
|
Six Months |
|
|
|
Ended |
|
|
Ended |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance |
|
$ |
224 |
|
|
$ |
245 |
|
Settlements at par |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending balance |
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial assets whose fair values we measure using Level 3 inputs consisted of municipal
auction rate securities. We classified $127 million and $151 million of these securities as
short-term investments and $89 million and $94 million as long-term investments on our balance
sheets at January 31, 2010 and July 31, 2009. At these dates all of the municipal auction rate
securities we held were rated A or better by the major credit rating agencies and 84% or more were
collateralized by student loans guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Education. These securities
are long-term debt instruments that are intended to provide liquidity through a Dutch auction
process that resets the applicable interest rate at pre-determined intervals, typically every 35
days. Due to a decrease in liquidity in the global credit markets, in February 2008 auctions began
failing for the municipal auction rate securities we held. Regularly scheduled auctions for these
securities have generally continued to fail since that time. When these auctions initially failed,
higher interest rates for many of the securities went into effect in accordance with the terms of
the prospectus for each security. As of January 31, 2010, we had received all interest payments in
accordance with the contractual terms of these securities.
We estimated the fair values of the municipal auction rate securities we held at January 31, 2010
based on a discounted cash flow model that we prepared. Key inputs to our discounted cash flow
model included the projected future interest rates;
the likely timing of principal repayments; the
probability of full repayment considering guarantees by the U.S. Department of Education of the
underlying student loans or insurance by other third parties;
12
publicly available pricing data for
recently issued student loan backed securities that are not subject to auctions; and the impact of
the reduced liquidity for auction rate securities. The following table presents information about
significant inputs to our discounted cash flow model at the dates shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs to Model at |
|
|
January 31, |
|
July 31, |
|
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of average projected future yield rates |
|
1.90% - 3.39% |
|
0.63% - 3.78% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of overall discount rates used in model
(like-kind security yield rate plus illiquidity
factor) |
|
1.47% - 1.72% |
|
1.61% - 1.86% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like-kind security yield rate |
|
0.22% |
|
0.36% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of illiquidity factors |
|
125 - 150 bps |
|
125 - 150 bps |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected holding period in years |
|
7 |
|
7 |
Using our discounted cash flow model we determined that the fair values of the municipal
auction rate securities we held at January 31, 2010 were approximately equal to their par values.
As a result, we recorded no decrease in the fair values of those securities for the three or six
months then ended. We do not intend to sell our municipal auction rate securities and it is not
more likely than not that we will be required to sell them before recovery at par. Based on the
maturities of the underlying securities and the put option described below, we classified $127
million and $151 million of these securities as short-term investments and $89 million and $94
million as long-term investments on our balance sheets at January 31, 2010 and July 31, 2009.
In August 2008 the broker-dealers for our municipal auction rate securities announced settlements
under which they may provide liquidity solutions, or purchase, the auction rate securities held by
their institutional clients. On November 4, 2008 we accepted an offer from UBS AG (UBS), one of the
broker-dealers for our municipal auction rate securities, that gives us the option to sell UBS a
total of $127 million in municipal auction rate securities at par value at any time during a
two-year period beginning June 30, 2010. The put option also gives UBS the discretion to buy any or
all of these securities from us at par value at any time. To date UBS has not purchased any of
these securities from us. We chose not to elect the fair value option for the put option at the
time we accepted the UBS offer. We accounted for the put option at its cost of zero on November 4,
2008, the date that we entered into the agreement, because we considered the value of the
securities subject to the put option to be substantially equal to their par values at that date.
The put option is considered to be a separate and freestanding financial instrument between UBS and
Intuit because it is non-transferable and could not be attached to the related auction rate
securities if they were to be sold to a third party. Since the put option is freestanding, we did
not consider the option when estimating the fair value of the UBS auction rate securities we held
at January 31, 2010 and July 31, 2009. We currently intend to exercise our option to sell UBS all
of these municipal auction rate securities at par value in accordance with the terms of the offer
within the next twelve months.
Based on our expected operating cash flows and our other sources of cash, we do not believe that
the reduction in liquidity of our municipal auction rate securities will have a material impact on
our overall ability to meet our liquidity needs.
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis
As discussed in Note 1, Significant Accounting Policies, on August 1, 2009 we adopted the
provisions of the authoritative guidance on fair value measurements for nonfinancial assets and
nonfinancial liabilities that we do not recognize or disclose at fair value on a recurring basis
(at least annually). These include reporting units measured at fair value in a goodwill impairment
test, other nonfinancial assets or liabilities measured at fair value for impairment
testing, and nonfinancial assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. In the
absence of an event or circumstance that indicates that the carrying value of a reporting unit may
not be recoverable, we test our goodwill for impairment annually during our fourth fiscal quarter.
13
3. Cash and Cash Equivalents, Investments and Funds Held for Customers
We consider highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the date of
purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents consist primarily of AAA-rated money market funds
in all periods presented. Investments consist of available-for-sale investment-grade debt
securities and municipal auction rate securities that we carry at fair value. Funds held for
customers consist of cash, AAA-rated money market funds and available-for-sale investment-grade
debt securities. Long-term investments consist primarily of municipal auction rate securities that
we carry at fair value. Due to a decrease in liquidity in the global credit markets, we estimate
the fair values of our municipal auction rate securities based on a discounted cash flow model that
we prepare. See Note 2 for more information. Except for direct obligations of the United States
government, securities issued by agencies of the United States government, and money market funds,
we diversify our investments by limiting our holdings with any individual issuer.
The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents, investments and funds held for
customers by balance sheet classification at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2010 |
|
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
(In millions) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Classification on balance sheets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
$ |
337 |
|
|
$ |
679 |
|
|
$ |
679 |
|
Investments |
|
|
607 |
|
|
|
609 |
|
|
|
666 |
|
|
|
668 |
|
Funds held for customers |
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
|
|
272 |
|
Long-term investments |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents, investments
and funds held for customers |
|
$ |
1,349 |
|
|
$ |
1,351 |
|
|
$ |
1,714 |
|
|
$ |
1,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes our cash and cash equivalents, investments and funds held for
customers by investment category at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2010 |
|
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
(In millions) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Type of issue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
502 |
|
|
$ |
502 |
|
|
$ |
951 |
|
|
$ |
951 |
|
Available-for-sale debt securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
408 |
|
|
|
409 |
|
|
|
447 |
|
|
|
448 |
|
Municipal auction rate securities |
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
|
|
245 |
|
Corporate notes |
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
152 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
|
|
44 |
|
U.S. agency securities |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
U.S. treasuries |
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale debt securities |
|
|
844 |
|
|
|
846 |
|
|
|
760 |
|
|
|
762 |
|
Other long-term investments |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cash and cash equivalents, investments
and funds held for customers |
|
$ |
1,349 |
|
|
$ |
1,351 |
|
|
$ |
1,714 |
|
|
$ |
1,716 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We include realized gains and losses on our available-for-sale debt securities in interest and
other income, net in our statements of operations. Gross realized gains and losses on our
available-for-sale debt securities for the three and six months ended January 31, 2010 and 2009
were not significant.
We accumulate unrealized gains and losses on our available-for-sale debt securities, net of tax, in
accumulated other comprehensive income in the stockholders equity section of our balance sheets.
Gross unrealized gains and losses on our available-for-sale debt securities at January 31, 2010 and
July 31, 2009 were not significant.
We periodically review our investment portfolios to determine if any investment is
other-than-temporarily impaired due to changes in credit risk or other potential valuation
concerns. We believe that the investments we held at January 31, 2010 were not
other-than-temporarily impaired. While certain available-for-sale debt securities have fair values
that are below cost, we do not intend to sell these securities and it is not more likely than not
that we will be
14
required to sell them before recovery at par. The unrealized losses at January 31,
2010 are due to changes in interest rates, including market credit spreads, and not due to
increased credit risks associated with the specific securities.
The following table summarizes our available-for-sale debt securities classified by the stated
maturity date of the security at the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, 2010 |
|
|
July 31, 2009 |
|
(In millions) |
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Due within one year |
|
$ |
189 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
186 |
|
Due within two years |
|
|
268 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
159 |
|
|
|
160 |
|
Due within three years |
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
5 |
|
Due after three years |
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
379 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
411 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total available-for-sale debt securities |
|
$ |
844 |
|
|
$ |
846 |
|
|
$ |
760 |
|
|
$ |
762 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-for-sale debt securities due after three years in the table above included $216
million and $230 million in municipal auction rate securities at January 31, 2010 and July 31,
2009, of which $127 million and $136 million were subject to the UBS put option that is effective
in June 2010. See Note 2. All of the remaining available-for-sale debt securities had an interest
reset date, put date or mandatory call date within two years of those dates.
4. Comprehensive Net Income (Loss)
We add components of other comprehensive income or loss, such as changes in the fair value of
available-for-sale debt securities and foreign currency translation adjustments, to our net income
or loss to arrive at comprehensive net income or loss. Other comprehensive income or loss items
have no impact on our net income or loss as presented in our statements of operations.
The components of comprehensive net income, net of income taxes, were as shown in the following
table for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
85 |
|
|
$ |
46 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
Components of other comprehensive income (loss): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in net unrealized gains (losses) on
investments, net of reclassification adjustment
for realized gains (losses), net of income taxes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
Foreign currency translation adjustment, net of
income taxes |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of
income taxes |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive net income, net of income taxes |
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
$ |
47 |
|
|
$ |
17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax provision (benefit) netted against
other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(6 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
5. Business Combinations
Mint Software Inc.
On November 2, 2009 we acquired all of the outstanding equity interests of Mint Software Inc. for
total consideration of approximately $170 million. The total consideration included approximately
$24 million for the fair value of assumed equity awards and cash retention bonuses that will be
charged to expense over a three year service period. Mint is a provider of online personal finance
services and became part of our Other Businesses segment. We acquired Mint to expand our online
personal finance offerings in support of our Connected Services strategy.
Under the acquisition method of accounting we allocated the fair value of the total consideration
transferred to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed
based on their estimated fair values on the date of acquisition. The fair values assigned to
identifiable intangible assets acquired were based on estimates and assumptions determined by
management. We recorded the excess of consideration over the aggregate fair values as goodwill.
Using information available at the time the acquisition closed, we allocated approximately $1
million of the consideration to tangible assets and liabilities and approximately $43 million of
the consideration to identified intangible assets. We recorded the excess consideration of
approximately $102 million as goodwill, none of which is deductible for income tax purposes. The
identified intangible assets are being amortized over a weighted average life of seven years.
We have included Mints results of operations in our consolidated results of operations from the
date of acquisition. Mints results of operations for periods prior to the date of acquisition were
not material when compared with our consolidated results of operations.
PayCycle, Inc.
On July 23, 2009 we acquired all of the outstanding equity interests of PayCycle, Inc. for a total
purchase price of approximately $169 million, including the fair value of certain assumed stock
options. PayCycle is a provider of online payroll solutions to small businesses and became part of
our Employee Management Solutions segment. We acquired PayCycle to expand our online payroll
offerings in support of our Connected Services strategy.
Under the purchase method of accounting we allocated the total purchase price to the tangible and
identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair
values on the date of acquisition. The fair values assigned to identifiable intangible assets
acquired were based on estimates and assumptions determined by management. We recorded the excess
of purchase price over the aggregate fair values as goodwill. Using information available at the
time the acquisition closed, we allocated approximately $5 million of the purchase price to
tangible assets and liabilities and approximately $42 million of the purchase price to identified
intangible assets. We recorded the excess purchase price of approximately $122 million as goodwill,
none of which is deductible for income tax purposes. We may adjust the preliminary purchase price
allocation after obtaining more information about asset valuations and liabilities assumed. The
identified intangible assets are being amortized over a weighted average life of seven years.
We have included PayCycles results of operations in our consolidated results of operations from
the date of acquisition. PayCycles results of operations for periods prior to the date of
acquisition were not material when compared with our consolidated results of operations.
6. Discontinued Operations
In January 2010 we sold our Intuit Real Estate Solutions (IRES) business for approximately $128
million in cash and recorded a net gain on disposal of $35 million. The decision to sell IRES was a
result of managements desire to focus resources on Intuits core products and services. IRES was
part of our Other Businesses segment.
We determined that IRES became a discontinued operation in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. We
have therefore segregated the net assets and operating results of IRES from continuing operations
on our balance sheets and in our statements of operations for all periods prior to the sale. Assets
held for sale at July 31, 2009 consisted primarily of goodwill. Because IRES operating cash flows
were not material for any period presented, we have not segregated them from continuing operations
on our statements of cash flows. We have presented the effect of the net gain on
disposal of IRES in net income from discontinued operations on our statements of cash flows for the
three and six months ended January 31, 2010.
16
Net revenue and net income (loss) from IRES discontinued operations were as shown in the following
table for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net revenue from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
$ |
18 |
|
|
$ |
33 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss from discontinued operations |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
Net gain on disposal of discontinued operations |
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net income (loss) from discontinued
operations |
|
$ |
34 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Current Liabilities
Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility
On March 22, 2007 we entered into an agreement with certain institutional lenders for a $500
million unsecured revolving credit facility that will expire on March 22, 2012. Advances under the
credit facility will accrue interest at rates that are equal to, at our election, either Citibanks
base rate or the London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a margin that ranges from 0.18% to
0.575% based on our senior debt credit ratings. The applicable interest rate will be increased by
0.05% for any period in which the total principal amount of advances and letters of credit under
the credit facility exceeds $250 million. The agreement includes covenants that require us to
maintain a ratio of total debt to annual earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization (EBITDA) of not greater than 3.25 to 1.00 and a ratio of annual EBITDA to interest
payable of not less than 3.00 to 1.00. We were in compliance with these covenants at January 31,
2010. We may use amounts borrowed under this credit facility for general corporate purposes or for
future acquisitions or expansion of our business. To date we have not borrowed under this credit
facility.
Other Current Liabilities
Other current liabilities were as follows at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for product returns |
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
22 |
|
Reserve for rebates |
|
|
44 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
Interest payable |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
Executive deferred compensation plan |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
Current portion of license fee payable |
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
Other |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
33 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other current liabilities |
|
$ |
234 |
|
|
$ |
153 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The balances of several of our other current liabilities, particularly our reserves for
product returns and rebates, are affected by the seasonality of our business. See Note 1,
Seasonality.
17
8. Long-Term Obligations
Senior Unsecured Notes
On March 12, 2007 we issued $500 million of 5.40% senior unsecured notes due on March 15, 2012 and
$500 million of 5.75% senior unsecured notes due on March 15, 2017 (together, the Notes), for a
total principal amount of $1 billion. The Notes are redeemable by Intuit at any time, subject to a
make-whole premium. We paid $28 million in cash for interest on the Notes during the six months
ended January 31, 2010 and 2009. Based on the trading prices of the Notes at January 31, 2010 and
July 31, 2009 and the interest rates we could obtain for other borrowings with similar terms at
those dates, the estimated fair value of the Notes at those dates was approximately $1.1 billion
and $1.0 billion.
Other Long-Term Obligations
Other long-term obligations were as follows at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
July 31, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total license fee payable |
|
$ |
73 |
|
|
$ |
71 |
|
Total deferred rent |
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Long-term deferred revenue |
|
|
26 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Long-term income tax liabilities |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
48 |
|
Other |
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total long-term obligations |
|
|
189 |
|
|
|
207 |
|
Less current portion (included in other current liabilities) |
|
|
(19 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term obligations due after one year |
|
$ |
170 |
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Innovative Merchant Solutions Loan and Buyout Commitments
In April 2005 our wholly owned subsidiary, Innovative Merchant Solutions (IMS), became a member of
Superior Bankcard Services, LLC (SBS), a newly formed entity that acquired merchant accounts for
our Payment Solutions business. Our consolidated financial statements include the financial
position, results of operations and cash flows of SBS, after elimination of all significant
intercompany balances and transactions, including amounts outstanding under the credit agreement
described below. In connection with the formation of this entity IMS agreed to provide to SBS
revolving loans in an amount of up to $40 million under the terms of a credit agreement. Amounts
outstanding under this agreement at July 31, 2009 totaled $7 million at interest rates of 4.3% to
5.0%. On December 7, 2009 we purchased all of the noncontrolling members interests in SBS for a
total price of approximately $9 million, net of loan repayments.
9. Income Taxes
Effective Tax Rate
We compute our provision for or benefit from income taxes by applying the estimated annual
effective tax rate to income or loss from recurring operations and other taxable items. Our
effective tax rate for the three months ended January 31, 2010 was approximately 37%. This differed
from the federal statutory rate of 35% due to state income taxes, which were partially offset by
the benefit we received from the domestic production activities deduction and the federal and state
research and experimentation credits. Our effective tax rate for the three months ended January 31,
2009 was approximately 18%. Excluding discrete tax benefits primarily related to a favorable
agreement we entered into with a tax authority with respect to tax years ended prior to fiscal
2009, our effective tax rate for that period was approximately 36% and did not differ significantly
from the federal statutory rate of 35%.
Our effective tax rate for the six months ended January 31, 2010 was approximately 27%. Excluding
discrete tax benefits primarily related to routine stock option deduction benefits, our effective
tax rate for that period was
approximately 37%. This differed from the federal statutory rate of 35% primarily due to state
income taxes, which
18
were partially offset by the benefit we received from the domestic production
activities deduction and the federal and state research and experimentation credits. We recorded a
tax benefit of $17 million on pre-tax income of $17 million for the six months ended January 31,
2009. Excluding discrete tax benefits primarily related to a favorable agreement we entered into
with a tax authority as described above and the retroactive reinstatement of the federal research
and experimentation credit, our effective tax rate for that period was approximately 36% and did
not differ significantly from the federal statutory rate of 35%.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits and Other Considerations
The total amount of our unrecognized tax benefits at July 31, 2009 was $40 million. Net of related
deferred tax assets, unrecognized tax benefits were $33 million at that date. If we were to
recognize these net benefits, our income tax expense would reflect a favorable net impact of $28
million. The recognition of the balance of these net benefits would result in an increase to
stockholders equity of $5 million. There were no material changes to these amounts during the
three and six months ended January 31, 2010. We do not believe that it is reasonably possible that
there will be a significant increase or decrease in unrecognized tax benefits over the next 12
months.
10. Stockholders Equity
Stock Repurchase Programs
Intuits Board of Directors has authorized a series of common stock repurchase programs. Shares of
common stock repurchased under these programs become treasury shares. We repurchased 8.2 million
and 18.8 million shares for $250 million and $550 million under these programs during the three and
six months ended January 31, 2010. We repurchased 1.4 million and 7.4 million shares for $35
million and $200 million under these programs during the three and six months ended January 31,
2009. At January 31, 2010, we had authorization from our Board of Directors to expend up to an
additional $350 million for stock repurchases through November 20, 2012.
Repurchased shares of our common stock are held as treasury shares until they are reissued or
retired. When we reissue treasury stock, if the proceeds from the sale are more than the average
price we paid to acquire the shares we record an increase in additional paid-in capital.
Conversely, if the proceeds from the sale are less than the average price we paid to acquire the
shares, we record a decrease in additional paid-in capital to the extent of increases previously
recorded for similar transactions and a decrease in retained earnings for any remaining amount.
19
Stock Option Activity
A summary of activity under all share-based compensation plans for the six months ended January 31,
2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
|
Available |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Price |
|
(Shares in thousands) |
|
for Grant |
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Per Share |
|
|
Balance at July 31, 2009 |
|
|
8,086 |
|
|
|
45,674 |
|
|
$ |
26.00 |
|
Additional shares authorized |
|
|
9,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options assumed and converted related
to business combinations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
372 |
|
|
|
3.08 |
|
Options granted |
|
|
(1,390 |
) |
|
|
1,390 |
|
|
|
30.04 |
|
Restricted stock units granted |
|
|
(994 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options exercised |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6,300 |
) |
|
|
21.80 |
|
Options canceled or expired (1) |
|
|
1,612 |
|
|
|
(1,864 |
) |
|
|
28.94 |
|
Restricted stock units forfeited (1) |
|
|
815 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January 31, 2010 |
|
|
17,129 |
|
|
|
39,272 |
|
|
$ |
26.46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at January 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
27,467 |
|
|
$ |
25.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
Stock options and restricted stock units canceled, expired or forfeited under expired
plans are not returned to the pool of shares available for grant.
|
Restricted Stock Unit Activity
A summary of restricted stock unit activity for the six months ended January 31, 2010 was as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Grant Date |
|
(Shares in thousands) |
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Nonvested at July 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,398 |
|
|
$ |
27.06 |
|
Granted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
994 |
|
|
|
29.92 |
|
Restricted stock granted related to
business combinations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
231 |
|
|
|
29.14 |
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,973 |
) |
|
|
29.39 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(818 |
) |
|
|
26.38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at January 31, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,832 |
|
|
$ |
26.97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Share-Based Compensation Expense
The following table summarizes the total share-based compensation expense that we recorded for the
periods shown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
(In millions, except per share amounts) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Cost of product revenue |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
1 |
|
Cost of service and other revenue |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Selling and marketing |
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
19 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
Research and development |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
General and administrative |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
Discontinued operations |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation expense |
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
65 |
|
|
|
57 |
|
Income tax benefit |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(12 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(20 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in net income |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Decrease in net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.07 |
|
|
$ |
0.13 |
|
|
$ |
0.11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At January 31, 2010, there was $207 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to
non-vested share-based compensation arrangements granted under all equity compensation plans which
we expect to recognize as expense in the future. Total unrecognized compensation cost will be
adjusted for future changes in estimated forfeitures. We expect to recognize that cost over a
weighted average vesting period of 1.9 years.
11. Litigation
Intuit is subject to certain routine legal proceedings, as well as demands, claims and threatened
litigation, that arise in the normal course of our business, including assertions that we may be
infringing patents or other intellectual property rights of others. We currently believe that the
ultimate amount of liability, if any, for any pending claims of any type (either alone or combined)
will not materially affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The
ultimate outcome of any litigation is uncertain and, regardless of outcome, litigation can have an
adverse impact on Intuit because of defense costs, negative publicity, diversion of management
resources and other factors. Our failure to obtain necessary license or other rights, or litigation
arising out of intellectual property claims, could adversely affect our business.
12. Segment Information
We have defined seven reportable segments based on factors such as how we manage our operations and
how our chief operating decision maker views results. We define the chief operating decision maker
as our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer. Our chief operating decision maker
organizes and manages our business primarily on the basis of product and service offerings.
All of our business segments except Other Businesses operate primarily in the United States and
sell primarily to customers in the United States. International total net revenue was less than 5%
of consolidated total net revenue for all periods presented.
We include expenses such as corporate selling and marketing, product development, and general and
administrative expenses and share-based compensation expenses that are not allocated to specific
segments in unallocated
corporate items. Unallocated corporate items also include amortization of purchased intangible
assets and acquisition-related charges.
21
The accounting policies of our reportable segments are the same as those described in the summary
of significant accounting policies in Note 1 to the financial statements in Item 8 of our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009. Except for goodwill and purchased
intangible assets, we do not generally track assets by reportable segment and, consequently, we do
not disclose total assets by reportable segment.
The following table shows our financial results by reportable segment for the three and six months
ended January 31, 2010 and 2009. Results for our Other Businesses segment have been adjusted for
all periods presented to exclude results for our Intuit Real Estate Solutions business, which
became a discontinued operation in the second quarter of fiscal 2010. See Note 6.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Management Solutions |
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
$ |
288 |
|
|
$ |
302 |
|
Employee Management Solutions |
|
|
105 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
202 |
|
|
|
183 |
|
Payment Solutions |
|
|
79 |
|
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
|
|
141 |
|
Consumer Tax |
|
|
216 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
238 |
|
|
|
201 |
|
Accounting Professionals |
|
|
124 |
|
|
|
133 |
|
|
|
146 |
|
|
|
154 |
|
Financial Institutions |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
Other Businesses |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
55 |
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
837 |
|
|
$ |
773 |
|
|
$ |
1,311 |
|
|
$ |
1,235 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Management Solutions |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
Employee Management Solutions |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
117 |
|
|
|
106 |
|
Payment Solutions |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
35 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
Consumer Tax |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
59 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
Accounting Professionals |
|
|
77 |
|
|
|
83 |
|
|
|
62 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Financial Institutions |
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
37 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
Other Businesses |
|
|
22 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
25 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment operating income |
|
|
327 |
|
|
|
269 |
|
|
|
397 |
|
|
|
330 |
|
Unallocated corporate items: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
(37 |
) |
|
|
(34 |
) |
|
|
(64 |
) |
|
|
(55 |
) |
Other common expenses |
|
|
(124 |
) |
|
|
(97 |
) |
|
|
(235 |
) |
|
|
(187 |
) |
Amortization of purchased intangible assets |
|
|
(16 |
) |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
(38 |
) |
|
|
(29 |
) |
Acquisition related charges |
|
|
(11 |
) |
|
|
(13 |
) |
|
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total unallocated corporate items |
|
|
(188 |
) |
|
|
(158 |
) |
|
|
(358 |
) |
|
|
(294 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating income from continuing
operations |
|
$ |
139 |
|
|
$ |
111 |
|
|
$ |
39 |
|
|
$ |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22
ITEM 2
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Our Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations (MD&A)
includes the following sections:
|
|
|
Executive Overview that discusses at a high level our operating results and some of the
trends that affect our business. |
|
|
|
Significant changes since our most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K in the Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates that we believe are important to understanding the
assumptions and judgments underlying our financial statements. |
|
|
|
Results of Operations that includes a more detailed discussion of our revenue and
expenses. |
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources which discusses key aspects of our statements of cash
flows, changes in our balance sheets, and our financial commitments. |
You should note that this MD&A discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks
and uncertainties. Please see Item 1A in Part II of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
important information to consider when evaluating such statements.
You should read this MD&A in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes in Part I,
Item 1 of this report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009.
In July 2009 we acquired PayCycle, Inc. for a total purchase price of approximately $169 million
and in November 2009 we acquired Mint Software Inc. for total consideration of approximately $170
million. Accordingly, we have included the results of operations for PayCycle and Mint in our
consolidated results of operations from their respective dates of acquisition. In January 2010 we
sold our Intuit Real Estate Solutions (IRES) business. Accordingly, we have reclassified our
financial statements for all periods prior to the sale to reflect IRES as discontinued operations.
Unless noted otherwise, the following discussion pertains to our continuing operations.
We calculate revenue growth rates and segment operating margins figures using dollars in thousands.
Executive Overview
This overview provides a high level discussion of our operating results and some of the trends that
affect our business. We believe that an understanding of these trends is important in order to
understand our financial results for the first half of fiscal 2010 as well as our future prospects.
This summary is not intended to be exhaustive, nor is it intended to be a substitute for the
detailed discussion and analysis provided elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
About Intuit
Intuit is a leading provider of business and financial management solutions for small and
medium-sized businesses, consumers, accounting professionals and financial institutions. We
organize our portfolio of businesses into four principal categories Small Business Group, Tax,
Financial Institutions and Other Businesses. These categories include seven financial reporting
segments.
Small Business Group: This category includes three segments Financial Management Solutions,
Employee Management Solutions, and Payment Solutions.
|
|
|
Our Financial Management Solutions segment includes QuickBooks financial and business
management software and services, technical support, financial supplies, and Web site
design and hosting services for small and medium-sized businesses. |
|
|
|
Our Employee Management Solutions segment provides payroll products and services for
small businesses. |
|
|
|
Our Payment Solutions segment provides merchant services for small businesses, including
credit and debit card processing, electronic check conversion and automated clearing house
services. |
Tax: This category also includes two segments Consumer Tax and Accounting Professionals.
|
|
|
Our Consumer Tax segment includes TurboTax income tax preparation products and services
for consumers and small businesses. |
23
|
|
|
Our Accounting Professionals segment includes ProSeries and Lacerte professional tax
products and services. This segment also includes QuickBooks Premier Accountant Edition and
the QuickBooks ProAdvisor Program for accounting professionals. |
Financial Institutions: This segment consists primarily of outsourced online services for banks
and credit unions provided by our Digital Insight business. It includes our online banking and
bill-pay services as well as our Personal FinanceWorks and Small Business FinanceWorks offerings,
which provide comprehensive online financial management solutions for consumers and small
businesses.
Other Businesses: This segment includes Quicken personal finance products and services; Mint.com
online personal finance services; and our business in Canada.
Seasonality and Trends
Our QuickBooks, Consumer Tax and Accounting Professionals businesses are highly seasonal. Revenue
from our QuickBooks software products tends to be highest during our second and third fiscal
quarters. Sales of income tax preparation products and services are heavily concentrated in the
period from November through April. In our Consumer Tax business, a greater proportion of our
revenue has been occurring later in this seasonal period due in part to the growth in sales of
TurboTax Online, for which revenue is recognized upon printing or electronic filing of a tax
return. These seasonal patterns mean that our total net revenue is usually highest during our
second quarter ending January 31 and third quarter ending April 30. We typically report losses in
our first quarter ending October 31 and fourth quarter ending July 31, when revenue from our tax
businesses is minimal while operating expenses continue at relatively consistent levels. We believe
the seasonality of our revenue is likely to continue in the future. In our MD&A we often focus on
year-to-date results for our seasonal businesses as they are generally more meaningful than
quarterly results.
Overview of Financial Results
Total net revenue for the first half of fiscal 2010 was $1.3 billion, an increase of 6% compared
with the same period of fiscal 2009. Revenue was higher in all of our business segments except
Financial Management Solutions and Accounting Professionals. Consumer Tax segment revenue increased
18% due to growth in TurboTax Online units. Operating income was essentially flat in the first half
of fiscal 2010 compared with the same period of fiscal 2009. Cost of product revenue and cost of
service and other revenue as a percentage of related revenue were slightly lower. Higher operating
expenses included the addition of operating expenses for acquired businesses, higher share-based
compensation expense, and higher depreciation expense for investments in our infrastructure. In
addition, operating expenses in the first half of fiscal 2009 benefited from certain
compensation-related items and a decline in the market value of executive deferred compensation
plan liabilities, neither of which recurred in the first half of fiscal 2010. Net income from
continuing operations of $11 million for the first half of fiscal 2010 decreased $23 million
compared with the same period of fiscal 2009 due to higher interest expense in the 2010 period and
discrete tax benefits in the first half of fiscal 2009 that did not recur in the first half of
fiscal 2010. Due to the foregoing factors, diluted net income per share from continuing operations
of $0.03 for the first half of fiscal 2010 was $0.07 per share lower than in the same period of
fiscal 2009.
We ended the first half of fiscal 2010 with cash, cash equivalents and investments totaling $946
million, including $127 million in municipal auction rate securities. We also held $89 million in
municipal auction rate securities that we classified as long-term investments at that date. In the
first six months of fiscal 2010 we generated cash from operations, from the issuance of common
stock under employee stock plans, and from the sale of our Intuit Real Estate Solutions business.
During the same period we used cash for the repurchase of shares of our common stock under our
stock repurchase programs, for the acquisition of Mint, and for capital expenditures. At January
31, 2010, we had authorization from our Board of Directors to expend up to an additional $350
million for stock repurchases through November 20, 2012.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
In preparing our financial statements, we make estimates, assumptions and judgments that can have a
significant impact on our net revenue, operating income or loss and net income or loss, as well as
on the value of certain assets and liabilities on our balance sheet. We believe that the estimates,
assumptions and judgments involved in the accounting policies described in Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Item 7 of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009 have the greatest
24
potential impact on our financial statements, so we consider them to be our critical accounting
policies and estimates. Except for the changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates
discussed below, we believe that there were no significant changes in those critical accounting
policies and estimates during the first half of fiscal 2010. Senior management has reviewed the
development and selection of our critical accounting policies and estimates and their disclosure in
this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q with the Audit and Risk Committee of our Board of Directors.
Fair Value of Nonfinancial Assets and Nonfinancial Liabilities
On August 1, 2009 we adopted the provisions of the authoritative guidance on fair value
measurements for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities that we do not recognize or
disclose at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually). These include reporting units
measured at fair value in a goodwill impairment test, other nonfinancial assets or liabilities
measured at fair value for impairment testing, and nonfinancial assets acquired and liabilities
assumed in a business combination. See Note 1, Significant Accounting Policies Fair Value of
Nonfinancial Assets and Nonfinancial Liabilities, in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q for a discussion of this guidance.
We describe the estimates, judgments, and assumptions we make in connection with goodwill and
purchased intangible asset impairment assessments under Goodwill, Purchased Intangible Assets and
Other Long-Lived Assets Impairment Assessments in the Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates section in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31,
2009. The authoritative guidance we adopted on August 1, 2009 generally increases the level of
estimates, judgments and assumptions we must make in connection with goodwill and purchased
intangible asset impairment assessments, and with estimating the fair value of nonfinancial assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. In accordance with the new guidance, we
define fair value as the price that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid to transfer
a liability in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Given the nature of nonfinancial
assets and liabilities, the change from an entity-specific perspective to a market participant
perspective is significant and inherently more complex. For example, if there are no known markets
or we do not have access to any markets, we will be required to identify hypothetical market
participants and develop a hypothetical market based on the expected assumptions of those market
participants. In addition, we consider and use multiple valuation methods, if appropriate. Using
multiple valuation methods can yield a range of possible results, which we must evaluate in order
to choose the most representative point within the range.
Assumptions and estimates about future values can be affected by a variety of internal and external
factors. Changes in these factors may require us to revise our estimates and record future
impairment charges for goodwill and purchased intangible assets, or retroactively adjust
provisional amounts that we have recorded for the fair values of assets and liabilities in
connection with business combinations. These charges and adjustments could materially decrease our
future operating income and net income and result in lower asset values on our balance sheet.
Business Combinations
We describe the estimates, judgments and assumptions we make in connection with our accounting for
business combinations under Business Combinations Purchase Accounting, in the Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates section in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended July 31, 2009. On August 1, 2009 we adopted revised authoritative guidance on
accounting for business combinations. See Note 1, Significant Accounting Policies Business
Combinations, in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of this
guidance.
Although the level of estimates, judgments, and assumptions we must make in connection with our
accounting for business combinations did not change significantly as a result of adopting this
guidance, our accounting for certain aspects of business combinations will now result in charges to
expense rather than affect the original purchase price allocation and goodwill. For example, for
all of our acquisitions regardless of acquisition date we will record any changes to deferred tax
asset valuation allowances and liabilities related to uncertain tax positions in current period
income tax expense unless those changes are identified during the one-year measurement period and
relate to new information obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition
date. In addition, should the initial accounting for a business combination be incomplete by the
end of a reporting period that falls within the measurement period, we will report provisional
amounts in our financial statements. During the measurement period, we will adjust the provisional
amounts recognized at the acquisition date to reflect new information obtained about facts and
circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date that, if known, would have affected the
25
measurement of the amounts recognized as of that date. We will apply those measurement period
adjustments that we determine to be significant retrospectively to comparative information in our
financial statements, including adjustments to depreciation and amortization expense. The new
authoritative guidance requires that we account for acquired company restructuring activities that
we initiate separately from the business combination rather than as part of the purchase price. It
also requires us to charge investment banking, legal and other professional fees that we incur to
complete the transaction to expense as we incur them.
As a result of our adoption of this authoritative guidance on accounting for business combinations,
we may incur additional income tax expenses, restructuring expenses, and expenses for professional
fees incurred to complete acquisitions. We may also be required to retroactively adjust provisional
amounts that we have recorded for the fair values of assets and liabilities in connection with
those acquisitions. These charges and adjustments could materially decrease our future operating
income and net income and result in lower asset values on our balance sheet.
Results of Operations
Financial Overview
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD |
|
YTD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 |
|
Q2 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
Q2 |
|
Q2 |
|
$ |
|
% |
(Dollars in millions, except per share amounts) |
|
FY10 |
|
FY09 |
|
Change |
|
Change |
|
FY10 |
|
FY09 |
|
Change |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total net revenue |
|
$ |
837 |
|
|
$ |
773 |
|
|
$ |
64 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
$ |
1,311 |
|
|
$ |
1,235 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
Operating income
from continuing
operations |
|
|
139 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
39 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
Net income from
continuing operations |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
86 |
|
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
|
(7 |
%) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
34 |
|
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
(68 |
%) |
Diluted net income
per share from
continuing operations |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
(0.01 |
) |
|
|
(4 |
%) |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.10 |
|
|
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
|
|
(70 |
%) |
Current Fiscal Quarter
Total net revenue increased 8% in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 compared with the same quarter
of fiscal 2009. In our Small Business Group, Financial Management Solutions segment revenue
decreased 3% due to lower QuickBooks unit sales that were partially offset by higher average
selling prices. Employee Management Solutions segment revenue increased 12% due to growth in the
customer base that was driven by our July 2009 acquisition of PayCycle. Payment Solutions segment
revenue increased 14% due to growth in the customer base partially offset by a decline in
transaction volume per customer compared with the same quarter of the previous fiscal year. In our
Tax businesses, Consumer Tax segment revenue increased 15% due to growth in TurboTax Online units.
Accounting Professionals segment revenue decreased 7% as we deferred about $9 million in revenue
from the second quarter to the third quarter of fiscal 2010 due to changes in our product and
service offerings. Financial Institutions segment revenue increased 10% due to growth in bill-pay
end users and transaction volumes; higher Personal FinanceWorks and Small Business FinanceWorks
revenue; and a new offering, TurboTax for Online Banking. Other Businesses segment revenue
increased 38% due to higher Quicken revenue.
Operating income from continuing operations increased $28 million or 25% in the second quarter of
fiscal 2010 compared with the same quarter of fiscal 2009. Revenue was $64 million higher and costs
and expenses were $36 million higher in the fiscal 2010 period. Total costs and expenses in the
second quarter of fiscal 2010 increased about $8 million due to higher cost of revenue associated
with higher revenue; about $11 million due to operating expenses for PayCycle and Mint; and about
$11 million due to higher variable compensation expense. See Cost of Revenue and Operating
Expenses later in this Item 2 for more information.
Net income from continuing operations decreased $6 million or 7% in the second quarter of fiscal
2010 compared with the same quarter of fiscal 2009. Our effective tax rate for the second quarter
of fiscal 2010 was 37%. Due to certain discrete tax items, our effective tax rate for the second
quarter of fiscal 2009 was 18%. See Income Taxes later in this Item 2 for more information about
our effective tax rates for these periods.
26
Due to the foregoing factors, diluted net income per share from continuing operations of $0.25 in
the second quarter of fiscal 2010 decreased 4% compared with $0.26 in the same quarter of fiscal
2009.
Fiscal Year to Date
Total net revenue increased 6% in the first half of fiscal 2010 compared with the same period of
fiscal 2009. In our Small Business Group, Financial Management Solutions segment revenue decreased
5% due to lower QuickBooks unit sales that were partially offset by higher average selling prices.
Employee Management Solutions segment revenue increased 10% due to growth in the customer base that
was driven by our July 2009 acquisition of PayCycle. Payment Solutions segment revenue increased 9%
due to growth in the customer base partially offset by a decline in transaction volume per customer
compared with the same period of the previous fiscal year. In our Tax businesses, Consumer Tax
segment revenue increased 18% due to 36% growth in TurboTax Online units. Accounting Professionals
segment revenue decreased 6% due to the revenue deferral described in Current Fiscal Quarter
above. See Business Segment Results Accounting Professionals later in this Item 2 for more
information. Financial Institutions segment revenue increased 9% due to growth in bill-pay end
users and transaction volumes and to higher Personal FinanceWorks and Small Business FinanceWorks
revenue. Other Businesses segment revenue increased 16% due to higher Quicken revenue.
Operating income from continuing operations increased $3 million or 8% in the first half of fiscal
2010 compared with the same period of fiscal 2009. Revenue was $76 million higher and total costs
and expenses were $73 million higher in the fiscal 2010 period. Total costs and expenses in the
first half of fiscal 2010 increased about $18 million due to higher cost of revenue associate with
higher revenue; about $17 million due to operating expenses for PayCycle and Mint; about $9 million
due to higher share-based compensation expense; and about $6 million due to higher depreciation
expense for investments in our infrastructure. In addition, total compensation-related expenses in
the first half of fiscal 2009 reflected the benefit of an $8 million decrease related to changes in
estimates for our stock compensation and 401(k) benefits plans and an $11 million decline in the
market value of executive deferred compensation plan liabilities, neither of which recurred in the
first half of fiscal 2010. See Cost of Revenue and Operating Expenses later in this Item 2 for
more information.
Net income from continuing operations decreased $23 million or 68% in the first half of fiscal 2010
compared with the same period of fiscal 2009. Interest expense was $7 million higher and interest
and other income, net was $2 million higher in the fiscal 2010 period due to factors described in
Interest Expense and Interest and Other Income, Net later in this Item 2. Due to certain
discrete tax items, our effective tax rate was 27% for the first half of fiscal 2010 and we
recorded a tax benefit of $17 million on pretax income of $17 million for the first half of fiscal
2009. See Income Taxes later in this Item 2 for more information about our effective tax rates
for these periods.
Due to the foregoing factors, diluted net income per share from continuing operations of $0.03 for
the first half of fiscal 2010 decreased $0.07 per share compared with the same period of fiscal
2009.
Business Segment Results
The information below is organized in accordance with our seven reportable business segments.
Results for our Other Businesses segment have been adjusted for all periods presented to exclude
results for our Intuit Real Estate Solutions business, which became a discontinued operation in the
second quarter of fiscal 2010. See Note 6 to the financial statements in Part 1, Item 1 for more
information.
Segment operating income or loss is segment net revenue less segment cost of revenue and operating
expenses. See Executive Overview Seasonality and Trends earlier in this Item 2 for a
description of the seasonality of our business. Segment expenses do not include certain costs, such
as corporate selling and marketing, product development, and general and administrative expenses
and share-based compensation expenses, which are not allocated to specific segments. These
unallocated costs totaled $161 million and $131 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and
2009 and $299 million and $242 million in the first half of fiscal 2010 and 2009. Unallocated costs
increased in the first half of fiscal 2010 compared with the same period of fiscal 2009 due in part
to $9 million in higher share-based compensation expense during the fiscal 2010 period and an $11
million decline in the market value of executive deferred compensation plan liabilities that
lowered corporate general and administrative expenses in the fiscal 2009 period. Segment expenses
also do not include amortization of purchased intangible assets and acquisition-related charges.
See Note 12 to the financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this report for reconciliations of
total segment operating income or loss to consolidated operating income or loss for each fiscal
period presented.
27
Financial Management Solutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD |
|
|
YTD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
% |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
% |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
FY10 |
|
|
FY09 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
FY10 |
|
|
FY09 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
101 |
|
|
$ |
108 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
185 |
|
|
$ |
206 |
|
|
|
|
|
Service and other
revenue |
|
|
53 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
103 |
|
|
|
96 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenue |
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
$ |
158 |
|
|
|
-3 |
% |
|
$ |
288 |
|
|
$ |
302 |
|
|
|
-5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of total revenue |
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating
income |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
|
-5 |
% |
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
67 |
|
|
|
-9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of related revenue |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Financial Management Solutions (FMS) product revenue is derived primarily from QuickBooks
desktop software products and financial supplies such as paper checks, envelopes, invoices,
business cards and business stationery. Financial Management Solutions service and other revenue is
derived primarily from QuickBooks Online, QuickBooks support plans, Web site design and hosting
services, and royalties from small business online services.
FMS total net revenue decreased $4 million or 3% in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and decreased
$14 million or 5% in the first half of fiscal 2010 compared with the same periods of fiscal 2009.
FMS revenue was lower in the first half of fiscal 2010 because total QuickBooks software units,
excluding activations of our free Simple Start offering, were down 3% in that period. Partially
offsetting the effect of lower units, average selling prices were higher because we offered fewer
promotional discounts in the fiscal 2010 period.
FMS segment operating income as a percentage of related revenue decreased slightly in the first
half of fiscal 2010 compared with the same period of fiscal 2009. Lower revenue was partially
offset by about $6 million in lower advertising and other marketing expenses in the fiscal 2010
period.
Employee Management Solutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD |
|
|
YTD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
% |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
% |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
FY10 |
|
|
FY09 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
FY10 |
|
|
FY09 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
60 |
|
|
$ |
58 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
120 |
|
|
$ |
115 |
|
|
|
|
|
Service and other
revenue |
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
82 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenue |
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
$ |
202 |
|
|
$ |
183 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of total revenue |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating
income |
|
$ |
61 |
|
|
$ |
52 |
|
|
|
19 |
% |
|
$ |
117 |
|
|
$ |
106 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of related revenue |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
55 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
58 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Employee Management Solutions (EMS) product revenue is derived primarily from QuickBooks
Payroll, a family of products sold on a subscription basis offering payroll tax tables, payroll
reports, federal and state payroll tax forms, and electronic tax payment and filing to small
businesses that prepare their own payrolls. EMS service and other revenue is derived from our
online payroll services (including the PayCycle service we acquired in fiscal 2009), fees for
direct deposit services, and other small business payroll services. Service and other revenue for
this segment also includes interest earned on funds held for customers.
28
EMS total net revenue increased $11 million or 12% in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 and $19
million or 10% in the first half of fiscal 2010 compared with the same periods of fiscal 2009.
Revenue was higher in the fiscal 2010 periods due to a 10% increase in the customer base that was
driven by our July 2009 acquisition of PayCycle.
EMS segment operating income as a percentage of related revenue increased in the second quarter of
fiscal 2010 compared with the same quarter of fiscal 2009. Higher revenue was partially offset by
higher costs and expenses due to our acquisition of PayCycle.
Payment Solutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD |
|
|
YTD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
% |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
% |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
FY10 |
|
|
FY09 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
FY10 |
|
|
FY09 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
9 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
Service and other
revenue |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
138 |
|
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenue |
|
$ |
79 |
|
|
$ |
70 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
$ |
141 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of total revenue |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating
income |
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
|
199 |
% |
|
$ |
35 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
|
190 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of related revenue |
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Payment Solutions service revenue is derived primarily from merchant services for small
businesses that include credit card, debit card and gift card processing services; check
verification, check guarantee and electronic check conversion, including automated clearing house
(ACH) and Check 21 capabilities; and Web-based transaction processing services for online merchants.
Service and other revenue for this segment also includes interest earned on funds held for
customers.
Payment Solutions total net revenue increased $9 million or 14% in the second quarter of fiscal
2010 and $13 million or 9% in the first half of fiscal 2010 compared with the same periods of
fiscal 2009. Revenue increased in the fiscal 2010 periods due to growth in the customer base
partially offset by declines in transaction volume per customer. For the first half of fiscal 2010,
customers grew 13% while transaction volume per customer was 5% lower compared with the same period
of fiscal 2009. Transaction volume per customer was down less in the first half of 2010 compared
with the first half of fiscal 2009. Transaction volume per customer in the 2009 period was 9% lower
compared with the first half of fiscal 2008.
Payment Solutions segment operating income as a percentage of related revenue increased in the
second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010 compared with the same periods of fiscal 2009 due to
higher revenue and lower staffing, marketing and facilities expenses in the fiscal 2010 periods.
29
Consumer Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD |
|
|
YTD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
% |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
% |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
FY10 |
|
|
FY09 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
FY10 |
|
|
FY09 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
82 |
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
90 |
|
|
$ |
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
Service and other
revenue |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
107 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenue |
|
$ |
216 |
|
|
$ |
187 |
|
|
|
15 |
% |
|
$ |
238 |
|
|
$ |
201 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of total revenue |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating
income |
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
|
49 |
% |
|
$ |
59 |
|
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
|
134 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of related revenue |
|
|
41 |
% |
|
|
32 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Consumer Tax product revenue is derived primarily from TurboTax federal and state consumer and
small business desktop tax return preparation software. Consumer Tax service and other revenue is
derived primarily from TurboTax Online tax return preparation services and electronic tax filing
services. Due to the seasonal nature of our Consumer Tax business, we will not have substantially
complete results for the 2009 tax season until the third quarter of fiscal 2010.
Consumer Tax total net revenue increased $37 million or 18% in the first half of fiscal 2010
compared with the same period of fiscal 2009 due to 36% growth in TurboTax Online units.
Consumer Tax segment operating income as a percentage of related revenue increased in the first
half of fiscal 2010 compared with the same period of fiscal 2009 due to higher revenue and
relatively flat operating expenses.
Accounting Professionals
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD |
|
|
YTD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
% |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
% |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
FY10 |
|
|
FY09 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
FY10 |
|
|
FY09 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
131 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
138 |
|
|
$ |
150 |
|
|
|
|
|
Service and other
revenue |
|
|
5 |
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenue |
|
$ |
124 |
|
|
$ |
133 |
|
|
|
-7 |
% |
|
$ |
146 |
|
|
$ |
154 |
|
|
|
-6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of total revenue |
|
|
15 |
% |
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating
income |
|
$ |
77 |
|
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
|
-7 |
% |
|
$ |
62 |
|
|
$ |
66 |
|
|
|
-5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of related revenue |
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
43 |
% |
|
|
42 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Accounting Professionals product revenue is derived primarily from ProSeries and Lacerte
professional tax preparation software products and from QuickBooks Premier Accountant Edition and
ProAdvisor Program for professional accountants. Accounting Professionals service and other revenue
is derived primarily from electronic tax filing services, bank product transmission services and
training services. Due to the seasonal nature of our Accounting Professionals business, we will not
have substantially complete results for the 2009 tax season until the third quarter of fiscal 2010.
Accounting Professionals total net revenue decreased $8 million or 6% in the first half of fiscal
2010 compared with the same period of fiscal 2009. About $9 million in Accounting Professionals
revenue shifted from the second quarter of fiscal 2010 to the third quarter of fiscal 2010,
primarily due to changes in our product and service offerings. In fiscal 2010 we began offering
certain services only in combination with our professional tax software,
which caused us to recognize this software revenue ratably over the expected service period rather
than immediately
30
upon customer purchase. Excluding the impact of this revenue shift, Accounting
Professionals revenue was flat in the first half of fiscal 2010 compared with the same period of
fiscal 2009.
Despite lower revenue, Accounting Professionals segment operating income as a percentage of related
revenue increased slightly in the first half of fiscal 2010 compared with the same period of fiscal
2009 due to operating efficiencies achieved in the product development and customer support
functions in the fiscal 2010 period.
Financial Institutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD |
|
|
YTD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
% |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
% |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
FY10 |
|
|
FY09 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
FY10 |
|
|
FY09 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service and other
revenue |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
76 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
164 |
|
|
|
151 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenue |
|
$ |
84 |
|
|
$ |
76 |
|
|
|
10 |
% |
|
$ |
164 |
|
|
$ |
151 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of total revenue |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
10 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating
income |
|
$ |
20 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
$ |
37 |
|
|
$ |
31 |
|
|
|
20 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of related revenue |
|
|
24 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
% |
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Financial Institutions service and other revenue is derived primarily from outsourced online
banking software products that are hosted in our data centers and delivered as on-demand service
offerings to banks and credit unions by our Digital Insight business.
Financial Institutions total net revenue increased $8 million or 10% in the second quarter of
fiscal 2010 and $13 million or 9% in the first half of fiscal 2010 compared with the same periods
of fiscal 2009. Revenue growth in the fiscal 2010 periods was driven by a 16% increase in bill-pay
end users, higher bill-pay transaction volumes, and growth in Personal FinanceWorks and Small
Business FinanceWorks revenue. Financial Institutions revenue for the second quarter of fiscal 2010
also benefited from the introduction of a new offering, TurboTax for Online Banking.
Financial Institutions segment operating income as a percentage of related revenue increased in the
second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010 compared with the same periods of fiscal 2009 due to
higher revenue and relatively flat operating expenses.
Other Businesses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
YTD |
|
|
YTD |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
% |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
% |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
FY10 |
|
|
FY09 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
FY10 |
|
|
FY09 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenue |
|
$ |
51 |
|
|
$ |
40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
78 |
|
|
$ |
72 |
|
|
|
|
|
Service and other
revenue |
|
|
24 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment revenue |
|
$ |
75 |
|
|
$ |
55 |
|
|
|
38 |
% |
|
$ |
119 |
|
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
|
16 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of total revenue |
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating
income |
|
$ |
22 |
|
|
$ |
14 |
|
|
|
59 |
% |
|
$ |
25 |
|
|
$ |
23 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of related revenue |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
|
|
Other Businesses consist primarily of Quicken, Mint.com and our business in Canada. Quicken
product revenue is derived primarily from Quicken desktop software products. Quicken service and
other revenue is derived primarily
from Quicken Online, fees from consumer online transactions, and Quicken Loans trademark royalties.
Mint.com
31
service revenue is derived primarily from lead generation fees. In Canada, product revenue
is derived primarily from localized versions of QuickBooks and Quicken as well as consumer desktop
tax return preparation software and professional tax preparation products. Service revenue in
Canada consists primarily of revenue from payroll services and QuickBooks support plans.
Other Businesses total net revenue increased $20 million or 38% in the second quarter of fiscal
2010 due to 66% growth in Quicken revenue. We believe that a portion of the second quarter revenue
growth was a result of launching Quicken 2010 later in the first quarter of this fiscal year than
we launched Quicken 2009 in the first quarter of last fiscal year. Other Businesses total net
revenue increased $16 million or 16% in the first half of fiscal 2010 compared with the same period
of fiscal 2009 due to a 21% increase in Quicken revenue that was driven by higher unit sales.
Other Businesses segment operating income as a percentage of related revenue increased in the
second quarter of fiscal 2010 and decreased slightly in the first half of fiscal 2010 compared with
the same periods of fiscal 2009. Higher revenue in the fiscal 2010 periods was partially offset by
about $6 million in higher costs and expenses associated with our November 2009 acquisition of Mint
and by our continued investment in emerging market opportunities.
Cost of Revenue
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
YTD |
|
|
% of |
|
|
YTD |
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Related |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Related |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
FY10 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
FY09 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
FY10 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
FY09 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenue |
|
$ |
48 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
$ |
56 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
$ |
83 |
|
|
|
13 |
% |
|
$ |
88 |
|
|
|
14 |
% |
Cost of service and
other revenue |
|
|
114 |
|
|
|
27 |
% |
|
|
98 |
|
|
|
29 |
% |
|
|
223 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
|
200 |
|
|
|
34 |
% |
Amortization of
purchased intangible
assets |
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
n/a |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total cost of revenue |
|
$ |
178 |
|
|
|
21 |
% |
|
$ |
168 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
$ |
344 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
$ |
317 |
|
|
|
26 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenue as a percentage of product revenue decreased in the second quarter and
first half of fiscal 2010 compared with the same periods of fiscal 2009 due to efficiencies
achieved for our consumer tax and professional tax product lines.
Cost of service and other revenue as a percentage of service and other revenue decreased in the
second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010 compared with the same periods of fiscal 2009 due to
unit growth in TurboTax Online, which has relatively lower costs of revenue compared with our other
service offerings.
Amortization of purchased intangible assets in the first half of fiscal 2010 included a $6 million
charge for the write-off of certain purchased technology that we no longer intend to use.
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
% of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
YTD |
|
|
Total |
|
|
YTD |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Net |
|
|
Q2 |
|
|
Net |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
FY10 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
FY09 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
FY10 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
FY09 |
|
|
Revenue |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling and marketing |
|
$ |
277 |
|
|
|
33 |
% |
|
$ |
271 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
$ |
457 |
|
|
|
35 |
% |
|
$ |
451 |
|
|
|
36 |
% |
Research and development |
|
|
144 |
|
|
|
17 |
% |
|
|
140 |
|
|
|
18 |
% |
|
|
285 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
|
|
274 |
|
|
|
22 |
% |
General and administrative |
|
|
88 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
|
|
70 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
165 |
|
|
|
12 |
% |
|
|
134 |
|
|
|
11 |
% |
Acquisition-related charges |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
1 |
% |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
$ |
520 |
|
|
|
62 |
% |
|
$ |
494 |
|
|
|
64 |
% |
|
$ |
928 |
|
|
|
71 |
% |
|
$ |
882 |
|
|
|
71 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
Current Fiscal Quarter
Total operating expenses as a percentage of total net revenue decreased in the second quarter of
fiscal 2010 compared with the same quarter of fiscal 2009. Revenue grew $64 million and total
operating expenses increased $26 million in the fiscal 2010 quarter. Total operating expenses
increased about $11 million for the operating expenses of acquired businesses and about $11 million
due to higher variable compensation expenses. General and administrative expenses also increased
about $3 million due to professional fees incurred in connection with our acquisition of Mint and
about $2 million due to a fiscal 2009 decline in the market value of executive deferred
compensation plan liabilities.
Fiscal Year to Date
Total operating expenses as a percentage of total net revenue were flat in the first half of fiscal
2010 compared with the same period of fiscal 2009. Revenue grew $76 million and total operating
expenses increased $46 million in the fiscal 2010 period. Total operating expenses increased about
$17 million for the operating expenses of acquired businesses, about $8 million due to higher
share-based compensation expense and about $6 million due to higher depreciation expense for
investments in our infrastructure. In addition, total compensation-related expenses in the first
half of fiscal 2009 reflected the benefit of an $8 million decrease related to changes in estimates
for our stock compensation and 401(k) benefits plans and an $11 million decline in the market value
of executive deferred compensation plan liabilities, neither of which recurred in the first half of
fiscal 2010. We record increases and decreases in the market value of executive deferred
compensation plan liabilities in general and administrative expense.
Non-Operating Income and Expenses
Interest Expense
Interest expense of $31 million and $24 million for the first half of fiscal 2010 and 2009
consisted primarily of interest on $1 billion in senior notes that we issued in March 2007.
Interest expense for the fiscal 2010 period was $7 million higher due to imputed interest on
technology license fees payable in the first half of fiscal 2010 and to capitalization of interest
during the construction of our Washington data center in the first half of fiscal 2009.
Interest and Other Income, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
(In millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
$ |
1 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
$ |
13 |
|
Net gains (losses) on executive deferred
compensation plan assets |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
(12 |
) |
Quicken Loans royalty income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total interest and other income, net |
|
$ |
2 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
7 |
|
|
$ |
5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impact of lower interest rates more than offset the impact of higher average invested
balances and resulted in lower interest income in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010
compared with the same periods of fiscal 2009. In accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, we record gains and losses associated with executive deferred compensation plan assets
in interest and other income, net and gains and losses associated with the related liabilities in
general and administrative expense. The amounts recorded in general and administrative expense
generally offset the amounts recorded in interest and other income, net.
33
Income Taxes
Effective Tax Rate
Our effective tax rate for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 was approximately 37%. This differed
from the federal statutory rate of 35% due to state income taxes, which were partially offset by
the benefit we received from the domestic production activities deduction and the federal and state
research and experimentation credits. Our effective tax rate for the second quarter of fiscal 2009
was approximately 18%. Excluding discrete tax benefits primarily related to a favorable agreement
we entered into with a tax authority with respect to tax years ended prior to fiscal 2009, our
effective tax rate for that period was approximately 36% and did not differ significantly from the
federal statutory rate of 35%.
Our effective tax rate for the first six months of fiscal 2010 was approximately 27%. Excluding
discrete tax benefits primarily related to routine stock option deduction benefits, our effective
tax rate for that period was approximately 37%. This differed from the federal statutory rate of
35% primarily due to state income taxes, which were partially offset by the benefit we received
from the domestic production activities deduction and the federal and state research and
experimentation credits. We recorded a tax benefit of $17 million on pre-tax income of $17 million
for the first six months of fiscal 2009. Excluding discrete tax benefits primarily related to a
favorable agreement we entered into with a tax authority as described above and the retroactive
reinstatement of the federal research and experimentation credit, our effective tax rate for that
period was approximately 36% and did not differ significantly from the federal statutory rate of
35%.
Discontinued Operations
On January 15, 2010 we sold our Intuit Real Estate Solutions (IRES) business for approximately $128
million in cash and recorded a net gain on disposal of approximately $35 million. IRES was part of
our Other Businesses segment. We have accounted for IRES as a discontinued operation and segregated
its operating results from continuing operations in our statements of operations for all periods
prior to the sale. IRES revenue was $14 million and $33 million for the second quarter and first
six months of fiscal 2010 and $18 million and $37 million for the same periods of fiscal 2009.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
At January 31, 2010, our cash, cash equivalents and investments totaled $946 million, a decrease of
$401 million from July 31, 2009 due to the factors noted under Statements of Cash Flows below.
Cash, cash equivalents and investments at January 31, 2010 included $127 million in municipal
auction rate securities. At that date we also held $89 million in municipal auction rate securities
that we classified as long-term investments on our balance sheet. See Auction Rate Securities
below for more information. Our primary source of liquidity has been cash from operations, which
entails the collection of accounts receivable for products and services. Our primary uses of cash
have been for research and development programs, selling and marketing activities, capital
projects, acquisitions of businesses, debt service costs and repurchases of common stock.
In March 2007 we issued five-year and ten-year senior unsecured notes totaling $1 billion in
connection with our acquisition of Digital Insight Corporation. See Contractual Obligations
Commitments for Senior Unsecured Notes later in this Item 2 for more information. We also have a
$500 million unsecured revolving line of credit facility that is described later in this Item 2. To
date we have not borrowed under the facility.
The following table summarizes selected measures of our liquidity and capital resources at the
dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
July 31, |
|
$ |
|
% |
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
Change |
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and investments |
|
$ |
946 |
|
|
$ |
1,347 |
|
|
$ |
(401 |
) |
|
|
(30 |
%) |
Long-term investments |
|
|
92 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
(5 |
%) |
Long-term debt |
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
998 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0 |
% |
Working capital |
|
|
562 |
|
|
|
884 |
|
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
|
(36 |
%) |
Ratio of current assets to current liabilities |
|
|
1.4 : 1 |
|
|
|
1.8 : 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34
Auction Rate Securities
At January 31, 2010, we held a total of $216 million in municipal auction rate securities. We
estimate the fair values of these securities based on a discounted cash flow model that we prepare.
See Note 2 to the financial statements in Item 1 for more information. Based on the maturities of
the underlying securities and the put option described below, we classified $127 million of these
securities as short-term investments and $89 million of these securities as long-term investments
on our balance sheet at that date. All of the municipal auction rate securities we held at January
31, 2010 were rated A or better by the major credit rating agencies and 84% were collateralized by
student loans guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Education. These securities are long-term debt
instruments that are intended to provide liquidity through a Dutch auction process that resets the
applicable interest rate at pre-determined intervals, typically every 35 days. Due to a decrease in
liquidity in the global credit markets, in February 2008 auctions began failing for the municipal
auction rate securities we held. Regularly scheduled auctions for these securities have generally
continued to fail since that time. When these auctions initially failed, higher interest rates for
many of the securities went into effect in accordance with the terms of the prospectus for each
security. As of January 31, 2010, we had received all interest payments in accordance with the
contractual terms of these securities.
In August 2008 the broker-dealers for our municipal auction rate securities announced settlements
under which they may provide liquidity solutions, or purchase, the auction rate securities held by
their institutional clients. On November 4, 2008 we accepted an offer from UBS AG (UBS), one of the
broker-dealers for our municipal auction rate securities, that gives us the option to sell UBS a
total of $127 million in municipal auction rate securities at par value at any time during a
two-year period beginning June 30, 2010. The offer also gives UBS the discretion to buy any or all
of these municipal auction rate securities from us at par value at any time. To date UBS has not
purchased any of these securities from us. We currently intend to exercise our option to sell UBS
all of these municipal auction rate securities at par value in accordance with the terms of the
offer within the next twelve months. We continue to have counter-party risk associated with UBS.
Based on our expected operating cash flows and our other sources of cash, we do not believe that
the reduction in liquidity of our municipal auction rate securities will have a material impact on
our overall ability to meet our liquidity needs.
Statements of Cash Flows
The following table summarizes selected items from our statements of cash flows for the six months
ended January 31, 2010 and 2009. See the financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this report for
complete statements of cash flows for those periods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
January 31, |
|
|
$ |
|
|
% |
|
(Dollars in millions) |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
Change |
|
|
Change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities |
|
$ |
105 |
|
|
$ |
(57 |
) |
|
$ |
162 |
|
|
|
(284 |
%) |
Investing activities |
|
|
(32 |
) |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(130 |
%) |
Financing activities |
|
|
(416 |
) |
|
|
(115 |
) |
|
|
(301 |
) |
|
|
262 |
% |
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
(110 |
%) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(342 |
) |
|
$ |
(74 |
) |
|
|
(268 |
) |
|
|
362 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Activities
During the first half of fiscal 2010 we generated $105 million in cash from our operations. This
included net income of $46 million; adjustments for depreciation and amortization of $143 million;
share-based compensation expense of $65 million; and seasonal working capital needs. Depreciation
expense increased about $6 million in the first half of fiscal 2010 compared with the first half of
fiscal 2009 due to investments in our infrastructure. Amortization expense in the first half of
fiscal 2010 included a charge of $6 million for the write-off of certain purchased technology that
we no longer intend to use.
35
During the first half of fiscal 2009 we used $57 million in cash for our operations. This included
net income of $33 million; adjustments for depreciation and amortization of $126 million;
share-based compensation expense of $57 million; and seasonal working capital needs.
Investing Activities
We used $32 million in cash for investing activities during the first half of fiscal 2010. We
received a net $122 million in cash from the sale of our Intuit Real Estate Solutions business. We
used $89 million in cash for net purchases of investments, $141 million in cash for acquisitions
(primarily Mint Software Inc.) and $66 million in cash for capital expenditures.
Investing activities generated $108 million in cash during the first half of fiscal 2009. We
received $221 million in cash from net sales of investments, which was partially offset by the use
of $117 million in cash for capital expenditures.
Financing Activities
We used $416 million in cash for financing activities during the first half of fiscal 2010,
including $550 million for the repurchase of common stock under our stock repurchase programs
partially offset by the receipt of $150 million in cash from the issuance of common stock under
employee stock plans.
We used $115 million in cash for financing activities during the first half of fiscal 2009,
including $200 million for the repurchase of common stock under our stock repurchase programs
partially offset by the receipt of $95 million in cash from the issuance of common stock under
employee stock plans.
Stock Repurchase Programs
Our Board of Directors has authorized a series of common stock repurchase programs. Shares of
common stock repurchased under these programs become treasury shares. During the first half of
fiscal 2010 and 2009 we repurchased 18.8 million and 7.4 million shares of our common stock for
$550 million and $200 million under our stock repurchase programs. At January 31, 2010, we had
authorization from our Board of Directors to expend up to an additional $350 million for stock
repurchases through November 20, 2012.
Acquisition of Mint Software Inc.
On November 2, 2009 we acquired Mint Software Inc. for total consideration of approximately $170
million. Mint is a provider of online personal finance services and became part of our Other
Businesses segment.
Disposition of Intuit Real Estate Solutions
On January 15, 2010 we sold our Intuit Real Estate Solutions (IRES) business for approximately $128
million in cash and recorded a net gain on disposal of approximately $35 million. IRES was part of
our Other Businesses segment and had revenue of approximately $74 million in fiscal 2009.
Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility
On March 22, 2007 we entered into an agreement with certain institutional lenders for a $500
million unsecured revolving credit facility that will expire on March 22, 2012. Advances under the
credit facility will accrue interest at rates that are equal to, at our election, either Citibanks
base rate or the London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a margin that ranges from 0.18% to
0.575% based on our senior debt credit ratings. The applicable interest rate will be increased by
0.05% for any period in which the total principal amount of advances and letters of credit under
the credit facility exceeds $250 million. The agreement includes covenants that require us to
maintain a ratio of total debt to annual earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and
amortization (EBITDA) of not greater than 3.25 to 1.00 and a ratio of annual EBITDA to interest
payable of not less than 3.00 to 1.00. We were in compliance with these covenants at January 31,
2010. We may use amounts borrowed under this credit facility for general corporate purposes or for
future acquisitions or expansion of our business. To date we have not borrowed under the credit
facility. We monitor counterparty risk associated with the institutional lenders that are providing
the credit facility. We currently believe that the credit facility will be available to us should
we choose to borrow under it.
36
Liquidity and Capital Resource Requirements
We evaluate, on an ongoing basis, the merits of acquiring technology or businesses, or establishing
strategic relationships with and investing in other companies. We may decide to use cash and cash
equivalents, investments, and our revolving line of credit facility to fund such activities in the
future.
Based on past performance and current expectations, we believe that our cash and cash equivalents,
investments, and cash generated from operations will be sufficient to meet anticipated seasonal
working capital needs, capital expenditure requirements, contractual obligations, commitments and
other liquidity requirements associated with our operations for at least the next 12 months. As
discussed above in this Item 2 under Liquidity and Capital Resources Auction Rate Securities,
we do not believe that the reduction in the liquidity of our municipal auction rate securities will
have a material impact on our overall ability to meet our liquidity needs.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At January 31, 2010, we did not have any significant off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in
Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K.
Contractual Obligations
We presented our contractual obligations in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended July 31, 2009. Except as discussed below, there have been no significant changes in those
obligations during the first half of fiscal 2010.
Commitments for Senior Unsecured Notes
On March 12, 2007 we issued $500 million of 5.40% senior unsecured notes due on March 15, 2012 (the
2012 Notes) and $500 million of 5.75% senior unsecured notes due on March 15, 2017 (the 2017 Notes)
(together, the Notes). The Notes are redeemable by Intuit at any time, subject to a make-whole
premium. Interest is payable semiannually on March 15 and September 15. At January 31, 2010, our
maximum commitment for interest payments under the Notes was $283 million.
We monitor the credit markets as part of our ongoing cash management activities. We currently
intend to either pay off the 2012 Notes when they become due using operating cash or refinance
those notes if the credit markets are favorable at that time.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For a description of recent accounting pronouncements and the potential impact of these
pronouncements on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows, see Note 1 to the
financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
37
ITEM 3
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Investment Risk
There has been significant deterioration and instability in the financial markets during fiscal
2009 and 2010. This period of extraordinary disruption and readjustment in the financial markets
exposes us to additional investment risk. The value and liquidity of the securities in which we
invest could deteriorate rapidly and the issuers of these securities could be subject to credit
rating downgrades. In light of the current market conditions and these additional risks, we
actively monitor market conditions and developments specific to the securities in which we invest.
We believe that we take a conservative approach to investing our funds in that we invest only in
highly-rated securities and diversify our portfolio of investments. While we believe we take
prudent measures to mitigate investment related risks, such risks cannot be fully eliminated
because of market circumstances that are outside our control.
Our investments consist of instruments that meet quality standards consistent with our investment
policy. This policy specifies that, except for direct obligations of the United States government,
securities issued by agencies of the United States government, and money market funds, we diversify
our investments by limiting our holdings with any individual issuer. We do not hold derivative
financial instruments in our portfolio of investments.
See Note 3 to the financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
a summary of the cost and fair value of our investments by type of issue. See Note 2 to the
financial statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations Liquidity and Capital Resources, in Part I, Item 2 for a description of market
events that have affected the liquidity of certain municipal auction rate securities that we held
at January 31, 2010.
Interest Rate Risk
Our cash equivalents and investments are subject to market risk due to changes in interest rates.
Interest rate movements affect the interest income we earn on cash equivalents and investments and
the fair value of those investments. Should the Federal Reserve Target Rate increase by 25 basis
points from the level of January 31, 2010, the value of our investments would decrease by
approximately $1 million. Should the Federal Reserve Target Rate increase by 100 basis points from
the level of January 31, 2010, the value of our investments would decrease by approximately $5
million.
We are also exposed to the impact of changes in interest rates as they affect our $500 million
revolving credit facility. Advances under the credit facility accrue interest at rates that are
equal to Citibanks base rate or the London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a margin that
ranges from 0.18% to 0.575% based on our senior debt credit ratings. Consequently, our interest
expense would fluctuate with changes in the general level of these interest rates if we were to
borrow any amounts under the credit facility. At January 31, 2010, no amounts were outstanding
under the credit facility.
On March 12, 2007 we issued $500 million of 5.40% senior unsecured notes due on March 15, 2012 and
$500 million of 5.75% senior unsecured notes due on March 15, 2017. We carry these senior notes at
face value less unamortized discount on our balance sheets. Since these senior notes bear interest
at fixed rates, we have no financial statement risk associated with changes in interest rates.
However, the fair value of these notes fluctuates when interest rates change. See Note 2 and Note
8 to the financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for more
information.
Impact of Foreign Currency Rate Changes
The functional currencies of our international operating subsidiaries are the local currencies. We
translate the assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries at the exchange rates in effect on
the balance sheet date. We translate their revenue, costs and expenses at the average rates of
exchange in effect during the period. We include translation gains and losses in the stockholders
equity section of our balance sheets. We include net gains and losses resulting from foreign
exchange transactions in interest and other income, net in our statements of operations.
38
Since we translate foreign currencies (primarily Canadian dollars, British pounds, Indian rupees
and Singapore dollars) into U.S. dollars for financial reporting purposes, currency fluctuations
can have an impact on our financial results. The historical impact of currency fluctuations on our
financial results has generally been immaterial. We believe that our exposure to currency exchange
fluctuation risk is not significant because our international subsidiaries invoice customers and
satisfy their financial obligations almost exclusively in their local currencies. Although the
impact of currency fluctuations on our financial results has generally been immaterial in the past
and we believe that for the reasons cited above currency fluctuations will not be significant in
the future, there can be no guarantee that the impact of currency fluctuations will not be material
in the future. As of January 31, 2010, we did not engage in foreign currency hedging activities.
39
ITEM 4
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Based upon an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, Intuits Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) have concluded that as of the end of the
period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q our disclosure controls and procedures as
defined under Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) were effective to provide reasonable
assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange
Commission and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During our most recent fiscal quarter, there has not occurred any change in our internal control
over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
40
PART II
ITEM 1
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
See Note 11 to the financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for
a description of legal proceedings.
41
ITEM 1A
RISK FACTORS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements. All statements in this
report, other than statements that are purely historical, are forward-looking statements. Words
such as expect, anticipate, intend, plan, believe, forecast, estimate, seek, and
similar expressions also identify forward-looking statements. In this report, forward-looking
statements include, without limitation, the following:
|
|
|
our expectations and beliefs regarding future conduct and growth of the business; |
|
|
|
the assumptions underlying our Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates, including our
estimates regarding product rebate and return reserves; stock volatility and other
assumptions used to estimate the fair value of share-based compensation; and expected
future amortization of purchased intangible assets; |
|
|
|
our belief that the investments we hold are not other-than-temporarily impaired; |
|
|
|
our belief that the reduction in liquidity of the municipal auction rate securities we
hold will not have a material impact on our overall ability to meet our liquidity needs; |
|
|
|
our belief that our exposure to currency exchange fluctuation risk will not be
significant in the future; |
|
|
|
our expectations regarding future payment or refinancing of the 2012 Notes; |
|
|
|
our assessments and estimates that determine our effective tax rate; |
|
|
|
our belief that our cash and cash equivalents, investments and cash generated from
operations will be sufficient to meet our working capital, capital expenditure and other
liquidity requirements for at least the next 12 months; |
|
|
|
our beliefs regarding seasonality and other trends for our businesses; |
|
|
|
our assessments and beliefs regarding the future outcome of pending legal proceedings
and the liability, if any, that Intuit may incur as a result of those proceedings; and |
|
|
|
the expected effects of the adoption of new accounting standards. |
We caution investors that forward-looking statements are only predictions based on our current
expectations about future events and are not guarantees of future performance. We encourage you to
read carefully all information provided in this Quarterly Report and in our other filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission before deciding to invest in our stock or to maintain or change
your investment. These forward-looking statements are based on information as of the filing date of
this Quarterly Report, and we undertake no obligation to publicly revise or update any
forward-looking statement for any reason.
Because forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties, there are important factors
that may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in the forward-looking
statements. These factors include the following:
|
|
|
We face intense competitive pressures that may harm our operating results. |
|
|
|
Future revenue growth depends upon our ability to adapt to technological
change and successfully introduce new and enhanced products and services. |
|
|
|
As our product and service offerings become more complex our revenue streams
may become less predictable. |
|
|
|
Business interruption or failure of our information technology and
communication systems may impair the availability of our products and services, which may
damage our reputation and harm our future financial results. |
|
|
|
The recent global economic downturn may harm our business and financial
condition. |
|
|
|
The nature of our products necessitates timely product launches and if we
experience significant product quality problems or delays, it may harm our revenue,
earnings and reputation. |
|
|
|
Our hosting, collection, use and retention of personal customer information
create risk that may harm our business. |
|
|
|
Our reliance on a limited number of manufacturing and distribution suppliers
may harm our business. |
|
|
|
Our revenue and earnings are highly seasonal and our quarterly results
fluctuate significantly. |
|
|
|
If we are unable to develop and maintain critical third party business
relationships, the business may be adversely affected. |
|
|
|
Because we depend on a small number of larger retailers and distributors,
changes in these relationships may harm our business. |
|
|
|
Increased government regulation of our businesses may harm our operating
results. |
|
|
|
Expansion of our operations in international markets exposes us to operational
and compliance risks. |
42
|
|
|
If we encounter problems with our third-party customer service and technical
support providers our business and future financial results may be harmed. |
|
|
|
We are exposed to risks associated with credit card and payment fraud and with
credit card processing. |
|
|
|
If we fail to adequately protect our intellectual property rights, competitors
may exploit our innovations, which may weaken our competitive position and reduce our
revenue and earnings. |
|
|
|
Third parties claiming that we infringe their proprietary rights may cause us
to incur significant legal expenses and prevent us from selling our products. |
|
|
|
We expect copying and misuse of our intellectual property to be a persistent
problem which may cause lost revenue and increased expenses. |
|
|
|
Our use of third party intellectual property in our products and services may
harm our business. |
|
|
|
Our acquisition and divestiture activities may disrupt our ongoing business,
may involve increased expenses and may present risks not contemplated at the time of the
transactions. |
|
|
|
We have issued $1 billion in a debt offering and may incur other debt in the
future, which may adversely affect our financial condition and future financial results. |
|
|
|
We are subject to risks associated with information disseminated through our
services. |
|
|
|
If actual product returns exceed returns reserves our future financial results
may be harmed. |
|
|
|
Acquisition-related costs and impairment charges may cause significant
fluctuation in our net income. |
|
|
|
Our investments in auction rate securities are subject to risks that may cause
losses and affect the liquidity of these investments. |
|
|
|
If we fail to process transactions effectively our revenue and earnings may be
harmed. |
|
|
|
Because competition for our key employees is intense, we may not be able to
attract and retain the highly skilled employees we need to support our planned growth. |
|
|
|
We are frequently a party to litigation that is costly to defend and consumes
the time of our management. |
|
|
|
Unanticipated changes in our tax rates may affect our future financial
results. |
|
|
|
Our business depends on our strong reputation and the value of our brands. |
This list does not include all risks that could affect our business, and if these or any other
risks or uncertainties materialize, or if our underlying assumptions prove to be inaccurate, actual
results could differ materially from past results and from our expected future results.
Our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2009 lists in more detail various
important risk factors facing our business in Part I, Item 1A under the heading Risk Factors.
Except as set forth below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in
that section of our Form 10-K. We incorporate that section of the Form 10-K into this filing and
encourage you to review that information. We also encourage you to review our other reports filed
periodically with the Securities and Exchange Commission for any further information regarding
risks facing our business.
If we are unable to develop and maintain critical third party business relationships, the business
may be adversely affected.
Our growth is dependent on the strength of our business relationships with many third party
partners and our ability to continue to develop and maintain new and existing relationships. We
rely on various business partners, including third party software and service providers, vendors,
licensing partners and development partners, among others, in many areas of our business in order
to deliver our products and services. In certain instances, these third party relationships are
sole source or limited source relationships and can be difficult to replace or substitute depending
on the level of integration of the third partys products or services into, or with, our products
and services and/or the general availability of such third partys products and services. The
failure of these third parties to provide adequate services and technologies or to update their
services and technologies, could result in a disruption to our business operations. In addition, if
a key business partner becomes insolvent, fails or is acquired, we may lose critical relationships,
functionality or services on which we rely to provide certain of our products and services.
Alternative arrangements and services may not be available to us on commercially reasonable terms
or we may experience business interruptions upon a transition to an alternative partner or vendor.
In our financial institutions business, we also rely on core processors and other third parties to
enable our online banking and bill pay services. Consolidation among core processors or between
core processors and online banking and bill-pay providers may create larger or
vertically-integrated competitors that may have stronger relationships with our current or
potential financial institutions clients. If these core processors fail to support any of the
43
functionality in our products and services or significantly raise their prices, we may lose
customers and our financial results may suffer.
The recent global economic downturn may harm our business and financial condition.
The recent global economic downturn has caused disruptions and extreme volatility in global
financial markets and increased rates of default and bankruptcy, and has impacted consumer and
small business spending. These macroeconomic developments have affected and may continue to
negatively affect our business and financial condition. Potential new customers may not purchase or
delay purchase of our products and services, and many of our existing customers may discontinue
purchasing or delay upgrades of our existing products and services, thereby negatively impacting
our revenues and future financial results. Decreased consumer spending levels may also reduce
credit and debit card transaction processing volumes causing reductions in our payments revenue. In
addition, weakness in the end-user consumer and small business markets may negatively affect the
cash flow of our distributors and resellers who may, in turn, delay paying their obligations to us,
which may increase our credit risk exposure and cause delays in our recognition of revenue or
future sales to these customers.
Additionally, if macroeconomic or other factors continue to cause banks, credit unions, mortgage
lenders and other financial institutions to fail, or result in further cost-cutting efforts or
consolidation of these entities, we may lose current or potential customers, achieve less revenue
per customer and/or lose valuable relationships with such of these entities that provide critical
services to our customers. Any of these events may likely harm our business and our future
financial results.
44
ITEM 2
UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS
Stock repurchase activity during the three months ended January 31, 2010 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Approximate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Dollar Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchased |
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
as Part of |
|
|
That May Yet |
|
|
|
Total Number |
|
|
Average |
|
|
Publicly |
|
|
Be Purchased |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price Paid |
|
|
Announced |
|
|
Under |
|
Period |
|
Purchased |
|
|
per Share |
|
|
Plans |
|
|
the Plans |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 1, 2009 through
November 30, 2009 |
|
|
1,250,000 |
|
|
$ |
29.50 |
|
|
|
1,250,000 |
|
|
$ |
563,123,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 1, 2009 through
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
4,520,043 |
|
|
$ |
30.10 |
|
|
|
4,520,043 |
|
|
$ |
427,065,117 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 through
January 31, 2010 |
|
|
2,479,500 |
|
|
$ |
31.08 |
|
|
|
2,479,500 |
|
|
$ |
349,996,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
8,249,543 |
|
|
$ |
30.31 |
|
|
|
8,249,543 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes:
1. |
|
All shares purchased as part of publicly announced plans during the three months ended
January 31, 2010 were purchased under a plan we announced on November 19, 2009 under which we
are authorized to repurchase up to $600 million of our common stock from time to time over a
three-year period ending on November 20, 2012. |
45
ITEM 4
SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
At Intuits Annual Meeting of Stockholders held on December 15, 2009, our stockholders voted as
follows on the below proposals:
1. |
|
Proposal to elect directors: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
Withheld |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
David H. Batchelder |
|
|
281,181,453 |
|
|
|
4,053,621 |
|
Christopher W. Brody |
|
|
228,211,687 |
|
|
|
57,023,387 |
|
William V. Campbell |
|
|
278,800,766 |
|
|
|
6,434,307 |
|
Scott D. Cook |
|
|
279,382,686 |
|
|
|
5,852,387 |
|
Diane B. Greene |
|
|
283,200,860 |
|
|
|
2,034,214 |
|
Michael R. Hallman |
|
|
240,278,154 |
|
|
|
44,956,920 |
|
Edward A. Kangas |
|
|
242,881,330 |
|
|
|
42,353,744 |
|
Suzanne Nora Johnson |
|
|
283,861,220 |
|
|
|
1,373,854 |
|
Dennis D. Powell |
|
|
284,118,529 |
|
|
|
1,116,545 |
|
Stratton D. Sclavos |
|
|
283,997,759 |
|
|
|
1,237,315 |
|
Brad D. Smith |
|
|
280,381,284 |
|
|
|
4,853,790 |
|
2. |
|
Proposal to ratify the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as Intuits independent registered
public accounting firm for fiscal 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
|
280,451,348 |
|
Against |
|
|
4,644,372 |
|
Abstain |
|
|
139,355 |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
|
|
0 |
|
3. |
|
Proposal to approve amendment of Intuits 2005 Equity Incentive Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
|
210,651,527 |
|
Against |
|
|
56,431,388 |
|
Abstain |
|
|
200,207 |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
|
|
17,951,953 |
|
4. |
|
Proposal to approve amendment of Intuits Employee Stock Purchase Plan: |
|
|
|
|
|
For |
|
|
262,667,061 |
|
Against |
|
|
4,458,857 |
|
Abstain |
|
|
157,204 |
|
Broker Non-Votes |
|
|
17,951,953 |
|
46
ITEM 6
EXHIBITS
We have filed the following exhibits as part of this report:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Filed |
|
Incorporated by |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Herewith |
|
Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.01+ |
|
Intuit Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan as amended
December 15, 2009 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.01 to the registration statement on Form
S-8 (Registration No. 333-163728) filed by the
registrant with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 15, 2009)
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.02+ |
|
Intuit Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan as amended
December 15, 2009 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.02 to the registration statement on Form
S-8 (Registration No. 333-163728) filed by the
registrant with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 15, 2009)
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.03+ |
|
Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Grant
Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.03 to the Form 8-K filed by the registrant with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on December
18, 2009) |
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.01 |
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.02 |
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.01* |
|
Section 1350 Certification (Chief Executive Officer)
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.02* |
|
Section 1350 Certification (Chief Financial Officer)
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS* |
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH* |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL* |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB* |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE* |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF* |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|
* |
|
Furnished, not filed. |
47
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
INTUIT INC.
(Registrant)
|
|
Date: March 1, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ R. NEIL WILLIAMS
|
|
|
|
R. Neil Williams |
|
|
|
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Authorized Officer and Principal Financial Officer) |
|
48
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
Filed |
|
Incorporated by |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Herewith |
|
Reference |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.01+
|
|
Intuit Inc. 2005 Equity Incentive Plan as amended
December 15, 2009 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.01 to the registration statement on Form
S-8 (Registration No. 333-163728) filed by the
registrant with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 15, 2009)
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.02+
|
|
Intuit Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan as amended
December 15, 2009 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 99.02 to the registration statement on Form
S-8 (Registration No. 333-163728) filed by the
registrant with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on December 15, 2009)
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.03+
|
|
Form of Director Restricted Stock Unit Grant
Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.03 to the Form 8-K filed by the registrant with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on December
18, 2009)
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.01
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.02
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.01*
|
|
Section 1350 Certification (Chief Executive Officer)
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.02*
|
|
Section 1350 Certification (Chief Financial Officer)
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.INS*
|
|
XBRL Instance Document
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.SCH*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.CAL*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.LAB*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.PRE*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
101.DEF*
|
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
+ |
|
Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement. |
|
* |
|
Furnished, not filed. |
49