UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-Q

 

 

 

Commission File Number: 1-13461

 

Group 1 Automotive, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

800 Gessner, Suite 500
Houston, Texas 77024
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

 

(713) 647-5700

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this Chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes o     No o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No þ

 

As of July 23, 2010, the registrant had 23,837,606 shares of common stock, par value $0.01, outstanding.

 

 

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

Group 1 Automotive, Inc., a Delaware corporation, through its subsidiaries, is a leading operator in the automotive retailing industry with operations in the states of Alabama, California, Florida, Georgia, Kansas, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oklahoma, South Carolina and Texas in the United States of America (the “U.S.”) and in the towns of Brighton, Farnborough, Hailsham, Hindhead and Worthing in the United Kingdom (the “U.K.”). Through their dealerships, these subsidiaries sell new and used cars and light trucks; arrange related financing, and sell vehicle service and insurance contracts; provide maintenance and repair services; and sell replacement parts. Group 1 Automotive, Inc. and its subsidiaries are herein collectively referred to as the “Company” or “Group 1.”

 

As of June 30, 2010, the Company’s retail network consisted of the following three regions (with the number of dealerships they comprised): (i) Eastern (42 dealerships in Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Mississippi, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York and South Carolina); (ii) Central (43 dealerships in Kansas, Oklahoma and Texas); and (iii) Western (11 dealerships in California). Each region is managed by a regional vice president who reports directly to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and is responsible for the overall performance of their regions, as well as for overseeing the market directors and dealership general managers that report to them. Each region is also managed by a regional chief financial officer who reports directly to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer. The Company has five dealerships in the U.K. that are also managed locally with direct reporting responsibilities to the Company’s corporate management team.

 

 

Basis of Presentation

 

All acquisitions of dealerships completed during the periods presented have been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and their results of operations are included from the effective dates of the closings of the acquisitions. The allocations of purchase price to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed are assigned and recorded based on estimates of fair value. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

 

Interim Financial Information

 

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments of a normal and recurring nature considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements. Due to seasonality and other factors, the results of operations for the interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that will be realized for the entire fiscal year. For further information, refer to the Consolidated Financial Statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (“2009 Form 10-K”).

 

Statements of Cash Flows

 

With respect to all new vehicle floorplan borrowings, the manufacturers of the vehicles draft the Company’s credit facilities directly with no cash flow to or from the Company. With respect to borrowings for used vehicle financing, the Company chooses which vehicles to finance and the funds flow directly to the Company from the lender. All borrowings from, and repayments to, lenders affiliated with the vehicle manufacturers (excluding the cash flows from or to manufacturer affiliated lenders participating in the Company’s syndicated lending group) are presented within Cash Flows from Operating Activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and all

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

borrowings from, and repayments to, the syndicated lending group under the revolving credit facility (including the cash flows from or to manufacturer affiliated lenders participating in the facility) are presented within Cash Flows from Financing Activities.

 

A reclassification was made within Cash Flows from Financing Activities on the 2009 Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows to reflect investments in the floorplan offset account related to Floorplan Notes Payable — Credit Facility as repayments on the credit facility and withdrawals from the offset account as borrowings on the credit facility.

 

Income Taxes

 

Currently, the Company operates in 15 different states in the U.S. and in the U.K., each of which has unique tax rates and payment calculations. As the amount of income generated in each jurisdiction varies from period to period, the Company’s estimated effective tax rate can vary based on the proportion of taxable income generated in each jurisdiction.

 

The Company follows the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income taxes are recorded based on differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the underlying assets are realized or liabilities are settled. A valuation allowance reduces deferred tax assets when it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

 

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

 

The Company’s financial instruments consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, contracts-in-transit and vehicle receivables, accounts and notes receivable, investments in debt and equity securities, accounts payable, credit facilities, long-term debt and interest rate swaps. The fair values of cash and cash equivalents, contracts-in-transit and vehicle receivables, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable, and credit facilities approximate their carrying values due to the short-term nature of these instruments or the existence of variable interest rates. The Company’s investments in debt and equity securities are classified as available-for-sale securities and thus are carried at fair market value. The Company’s derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair market value. See Note 8, “Derivative Instruments and Risk Management Activities” and Note 10, “Fair Value Measurements” for further details regarding the Company’s derivative financial instruments and fair value measurements. The Company carries its long-term debt at face value, net of applicable discounts. As of June 30, 2010, the face value of $115.0 million of the Company’s outstanding 3.00% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020 (the “3.00% Notes”) had a carrying value, net of applicable discount, of $72.9 million, and a fair value, based on quoted market prices, of $93.2 million. Also, as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the face value of $182.8 million of the Company’s outstanding 2.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2036 (the “2.25% Notes”) had a carrying value, net of applicable discount, of $135.0 million and $131.9 million, respectively, and a fair value, based on quoted market prices, of $134.3 million and $143.5 million, respectively.

 

Long-Lived Assets

 

The Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment when evidence exists that the carrying value of these assets may not be recoverable (i.e., triggering events). This review consists of comparing the carrying amount of the asset with its expected future undiscounted cash flows without interest costs. If the asset’s carrying amount is greater than the future undiscounted cash flow estimate, then it is required to be written down to its fair value, as applicable.

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

Goodwill

 

The Company defines its reporting units as each of its three regions in the U.S. and the U.K. Goodwill represents the excess, at the date of acquisition, of the purchase price of the business acquired over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets acquired. Annually, the Company performs a fair value and potential impairment assessment of its goodwill. An impairment analysis is done more frequently if certain events or circumstances arise that would indicate a change in the fair value of the non-financial asset has occurred (i.e., an impairment indicator). In evaluating its goodwill, the Company compares the carrying value of the net assets of each reporting unit to its respective fair value. This represents the first step of the impairment test. If the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying value of its net assets, the Company must proceed to step two of the impairment test. Step two involves allocating the calculated fair value to all of the tangible and identifiable intangible assets of the reporting unit as if the calculated fair value was the purchase price in a business combination. To the extent the carrying value of the goodwill exceeds its implied fair value under step two of the impairment test, an impairment charge equal to the difference is recorded. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company did not identify an impairment indicator relative to its goodwill. As a result, the Company was not required to conduct the first step of the impairment test. However, if in future periods the Company determines that the carrying amount of the net assets of one or more of its reporting units exceeds the respective fair value as a result of step one, the Company believes that the application of step two of the impairment test could result in a material impairment charge to the goodwill associated with the reporting unit(s).

 

Intangible Franchise Rights

 

The Company’s only significant identifiable intangible assets, other than goodwill, are rights under franchise agreements with manufacturers, which are recorded at an individual dealership level. The Company expects these franchise agreements to continue for an indefinite period and, when these agreements do not have indefinite terms, the Company believes that renewal of these agreements can be obtained without substantial cost. As such, the Company believes that its franchise agreements will contribute to cash flows for an indefinite period and, therefore, the carrying amounts of the franchise rights are not amortized. The Company evaluates these franchise rights for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate possible impairment has occurred. In performing its impairment assessments, the Company tests the carrying value of each individual franchise right that was recorded by using a direct value method, discounted cash flow model. During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company did not identify an impairment indicator relative to its capitalized value of intangible franchise rights and, therefore, no impairment evaluation was required.

 

Foreign Currency Translation

 

The functional currency for the Company’s foreign subsidiaries is the Pound Sterling. The financial statements of all of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries have been translated into U.S. dollars. All assets and liabilities of foreign operations are translated into U.S. Dollars using period-end exchange rates and all revenues and expenses are translated at average rates during the respective period. The U.S. Dollar results that arise from the translation of all assets and liabilities are included in the cumulative currency translation adjustments in accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) in stockholders’ equity and other income/(expense), when applicable.

 

Accounting for Convertible Debt

 

The Company separately accounts for the liability and equity component of its convertible debt instrument in a manner that reflects the issuer’s economic interest cost. Upon issuance of a convertible debt instrument, the Company estimates the fair value of the debt component. The resulting residual value is determined to be the fair value of the equity component of the Company’s convertible debt and is included in the paid-in-capital section of stockholder’s equity, net of applicable taxes, on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. The value of the equity component is treated as an original issue discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component, which

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

is amortized as non-cash interest expense through the date that the convertible debt is first putable to the Company. See Note 7 “Long-term Debt” for further details on the impact of this convertible debt accounting to the Company’s financial statements.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements” (“ASU 2010-06”) to require disclosure of: (1) amounts, and reasons why, of significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy (2) reasons for any transfers in or out of Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy and (3) information in the reconciliation of recurring Level 3 measurements about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis. In addition, ASU 2010-06 amended existing disclosure requirements of ASC Topic No. 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (“ASC 820”), to clarify that fair value measurement disclosures should be provided by class of assets and liabilities (rather than by each major category). Except for requirement (3) above, all of the amendments to ASC 820 made by ASU 2010-06 are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009. Requirement (3) above will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. See Note 10, “Fair Value Measurements” for further details regarding the Company’s fair value measurements and the Company adopted the reporting requirements of ASU 2010-06 as of January 1, 2010. The Company does not expect the adoption of the amendments regarding requirement (3) to have a material impact on its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

 

The Company provides compensation benefits to employees and non-employee directors pursuant to its 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan, as amended, as well as to employees pursuant to its 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended.

 

2007 Long Term Incentive Plan

 

The “Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 2007 Long Term Incentive Plan,” (the “Incentive Plan”) was amended and restated in May 2010 to increase the number of shares available for issuance under the plan from 6.5 million to 7.5 million, for grants to non-employee directors, officers and other employees of the Company and its subsidiaries of: (1) options (including options qualified as incentive stock options under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and options that are non-qualified) the exercise price of which may not be less than the fair market value of the common stock on the date of the grant, and (2) stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, performance awards, bonus stock and phantom stock awards, each at the market price of the Company’s stock at the date of grant. The Incentive Plan expires on March 8, 2017. The terms of the awards (including vesting schedules) are established by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors. All outstanding awards are exercisable over a period not to exceed ten years and vest over a period not to exceed five years. Certain of the Company’s option awards are subject to graded vesting over a service period. In those cases, the Company recognizes compensation cost on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of valuation and reduce expense ratably over the vesting period. This estimate is adjusted periodically based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the previous estimate. As of June 30, 2010, there were 1,747,679 shares available under the Incentive Plan for future grants of these awards.

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

Stock Option Awards

 

No stock option awards have been granted since November 2005. The following summary presents information regarding outstanding options as of June 30, 2010, and the changes during the six months then ended:

 

 

Restricted Stock Awards

 

In 2005, the Company began granting non-employee directors and certain employees, at no cost to the recipient, restricted stock awards or, at their election, phantom stock awards, pursuant to the Incentive Plan. In November 2006, the Company began to grant certain employees, at no cost to the recipient, performance awards pursuant to the Incentive Plan. Restricted stock awards are considered outstanding at the date of grant, but are subject to forfeiture provisions for periods ranging from six months to five years. The phantom stock awards will settle in shares of common stock upon the termination of the grantees’ employment or directorship and vest over a period not to exceed five years. Performance awards are considered outstanding at the date of grant, with forfeiture provisions that lapse based on time and the achievement of certain performance criteria established by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. In the event the employee or director terminates his or her employment or directorship with the Company prior to the lapse of the restrictions, the shares, in most cases, will be forfeited to the Company. Compensation expense for these awards is calculated based on the price of the Company’s common stock at the date of grant and recognized over the requisite service period or as the performance criteria are met.

 

A summary of these awards as of June 30, 2010, and the changes during the six months then ended, is as follows:

 

 

1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 

In September 1997, the Company adopted the Group 1 Automotive, Inc. 1998 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as amended (the “Purchase Plan”). The Purchase Plan authorizes the issuance of up to 3.5 million shares of common stock and provides that no options to purchase shares may be granted under the Purchase Plan after March 6, 2016. The Purchase Plan is available to all employees of the Company and its participating subsidiaries and is a qualified

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

plan as defined by Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. At the end of each fiscal quarter (the “Option Period”) during the term of the Purchase Plan, the employee contributions are used by the employee to acquire shares of common stock from the Company at 85% of the fair market value of the common stock on the first or the last day of the Option Period, whichever is lower. As of June 30, 2010, there were 1,010,800 shares remaining in reserve for future issuance under the Purchase Plan. During the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company issued 71,499 and 125,211 shares, respectively, of common stock to employees participating in the Purchase Plan.

 

The weighted average fair value of employee stock purchase rights issued pursuant to the Purchase Plan was $8.05 and $5.71 during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The fair value of the stock purchase rights was calculated as the sum of (a) the difference between the stock price and the employee purchase price, (b) the value of the embedded call option and (c) the value of the embedded put option.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

Total stock-based compensation cost was $2.5 million and $3.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $5.2 million and $5.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009. Cash received from option exercises and Purchase Plan purchases was $1.7 million and $1.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Additional paid-in capital was reduced by $1.1 million and $0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, for the effect of tax deductions for options exercised and vesting of restricted shares that were less than the associated book expense previously recognized. Total income tax benefit recognized for stock-based compensation arrangements was $1.5 million and $1.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

The Company issues new shares when options are exercised or restricted stock vests or, at times, will use treasury shares, if available. With respect to shares issued under the Purchase Plan, the Company’s Board of Directors has authorized specific share repurchases to fund the shares issuable under the Purchase Plan.

 

 

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed based on weighted average shares outstanding and excludes dilutive securities. Diluted EPS is computed including the impact of all potentially dilutive securities. The following table sets forth the calculation of EPS for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

 

 

Any options with an exercise price in excess of the average market price of the Company’s common stock, during the periods presented, are not considered when calculating the dilutive effect of stock options for diluted

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

earnings per share calculations. The weighted average number of stock-based awards not included in the calculation of the dilutive effect of stock-based awards were 0.2 million and 0.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and 0.2 million and 0.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

If the 2.25% Notes become convertible into common shares, the Company will be required to include the dilutive effect of the net shares issuable under the 2.25% Notes and the warrants sold in connection with the 2.25% Notes (the “2.25% Warrants”). Since the average price of the Company’s common stock for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was less than $59.43, no net shares were issuable under the 2.25% Notes or the 2.25% Warrants.

 

If the 3.00% Notes become convertible into common shares, the Company will be required to include the dilutive effect of the net shares issuable under the 3.00% Notes and the warrants sold in connection with the 3.00% Notes (the “3.00% Warrants”). Since the average price of the Company’s common stock for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was less than $38.61, no net shares were issuable under the 3.00% Notes or the 3.00% Warrants.

 

 

The Company is subject to U.S. federal income taxes and income taxes in numerous states. In addition, the Company is subject to income tax in the U.K. as a result of its dealership acquisitions in March 2007. The effective income tax rate of 39.6% of pretax income for the three months ended June 30, 2010 differed from the federal statutory rate of 35.0% due primarily to taxes provided for the taxable state jurisdictions in which the Company operates and certain goodwill associated with a dealership disposed of during the three months ended June 30, 2010 that was not deductible for tax purposes.

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company’s effective tax rate decreased to 39.4% from 39.8% for the same period in 2009. The change was primarily due to changes in certain state tax laws and rates, and the mix of pretax income from the taxable state jurisdictions in which the Company operates.

 

As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits. Consistent with prior practices, the Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. The Company did not incur any interest and penalties nor did it accrue any interest for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

 

Taxable years 2005 and subsequent remain open for examination by the Company’s major taxing jurisdictions.

 

 

The Company has a $1.35 billion revolving syndicated credit arrangement (the “Revolving Credit Facility”). The Company also has a $150.0 million floorplan financing arrangement with Ford Motor Credit Company (the “FMCC Facility”), a $235.0 million real estate credit facility (the “Mortgage Facility”) for financing of real estate expansion, as well as, arrangements with several other automobile manufacturers for financing of a portion of its rental vehicle inventory. Within the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets, Floorplan Notes Payable — Credit Facility reflects amounts payable for the purchase of specific new, used and rental vehicle inventory (with the exception of new and rental vehicle purchases financed through lenders affiliated with the respective manufacturer) whereby financing is provided by the Revolving Credit Facility. Floorplan Notes Payable — Manufacturer Affiliates reflects amounts payable for the purchase of specific new vehicles whereby financing is provided by the FMCC Facility, the financing of new and used vehicles in the U.K. with BMW Financial Services and the financing of rental vehicle inventory with several other manufacturers. Payments on the floorplan notes payable are generally due as the vehicles are sold. As a result, these obligations are reflected on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as current liabilities.

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

Revolving Credit Facility

 

The Revolving Credit Facility, which is comprised of 20 financial institutions, including four manufacturer-affiliated finance companies, expires in March 2012 and consists of two tranches: $1.0 billion for vehicle inventory floorplan financing (the “Floorplan Line”) and $350.0 million for working capital, including acquisitions (the “Acquisition Line”). Up to half of the Acquisition Line can be borrowed in either Euros or Pound Sterling. The capacity under these two tranches can be re-designated within the overall $1.35 billion commitment, subject to the original limits of a minimum of $1.0 billion for the Floorplan Line and maximum of $350.0 million for the Acquisition Line. The Revolving Credit Facility can be expanded to its maximum commitment of $1.85 billion, subject to participating lender approval. The Acquisition Line bears interest at the London Inter Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a margin that ranges from 150 to 250 basis points, depending on the Company’s leverage ratio. The Floorplan Line bears interest at rates equal to LIBOR plus 87.5 basis points for new vehicle inventory and LIBOR plus 97.5 basis points for used vehicle inventory. In addition, the Company pays a commitment fee on the unused portion of the Acquisition Line, as well as the Floorplan Line. The available funds on the Acquisition Line carry a commitment fee ranging from 0.25% to 0.375% per annum, depending on the Company’s leverage ratio, based on a minimum commitment of $200.0 million. The Floorplan Line requires a 0.20% commitment fee on the unused portion. In conjunction with the amendment to the Revolving Credit Facility on March 19, 2007, the Company capitalized $2.3 million of related costs that are being amortized over the term of the facility.

 

As of June 30, 2010, after considering outstanding balances of $531.8 million, the Company had $468.2 million of available floorplan capacity under the Floorplan Line. Included in the $468.2 million available balance under the Floorplan Line is $72.0 million of immediately available funds. The weighted average interest rate on the Floorplan Line was 1.2% as of June 30, 2010. With regards to the Acquisition Line, no borrowings were outstanding as of June 30, 2010. After considering the $17.3 million of outstanding letters of credit, and other factors included in the Company’s available borrowing base calculation, there was $170.8 million of available borrowing capacity under the Acquisition Line as of June 30, 2010. The amount of available borrowing capacity under the Acquisition Line may vary from time to time based upon certain debt covenants. Amounts borrowed by the Company under the Floorplan Line of the Revolving Credit Facility must be repaid upon the sale of the specific vehicle financed, and in no case may a borrowing for a vehicle remain outstanding for greater than one year.

 

All of the Company’s domestic dealership-owning subsidiaries are co-borrowers under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Revolving Credit Facility contains a number of significant covenants that, among other things, restrict the Company’s ability to make disbursements outside of the ordinary course of business, dispose of assets, incur additional indebtedness, create liens on assets, make investments and engage in mergers or consolidations. The Company is also required to comply with specified financial tests and ratios defined in the Revolving Credit Facility, such as fixed charge coverage, current, total leverage, and senior secured leverage, among others. Further, provisions of the Revolving Credit Facility require the Company to maintain a minimum level of stockholders’ equity (the “Required Stockholders’ Equity”), which effectively limits the amount of disbursements (or “Restricted Payments”) that the Company may make outside the ordinary course of business (e.g., cash dividends and stock repurchases). The Required Stockholders’ Equity is defined as a base of $520.0 million, plus 50% of cumulative adjusted net income, plus 100% of the proceeds from any equity issuances and less non-cash asset impairment charges. The amount by which adjusted stockholders’ equity exceeds the Required Stockholders’ Equity is the amount available for Restricted Payments (the “Amount Available for Restricted Payments”). For purposes of this covenant calculation, net income and stockholders’ equity represents such amounts per the consolidated financial statements, adjusted to exclude the Company’s foreign operations and the impact of the adoption of the accounting standard for convertible debt that became effective on January 1, 2009 and was primarily codified in ASC 470. As of June 30, 2010, the Amount Available for Restricted Payments was $161.7 million.

 

As of June 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all applicable covenants and ratios under the Revolving Credit Facility. The Company’s obligations under the Revolving Credit Facility are secured by

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

essentially all of the Company’s domestic personal property (other than equity interests in dealership-owning subsidiaries) including all motor vehicle inventory and proceeds from the disposition of dealership-owning subsidiaries.

 

Ford Motor Credit Company Facility

 

The FMCC Facility provides for the financing of, and is collateralized by, the Company’s entire Ford, Lincoln and Mercury new vehicle inventory. This arrangement provides for $150.0 million of floorplan financing and is an evergreen arrangement that may be cancelled with 30 days notice by either party. As of June 30, 2010, the Company had an outstanding balance of $50.6 million with an available floorplan capacity of $99.4 million. This facility bears interest at a rate of Prime plus 150 basis points minus certain incentives; however, the prime rate is defined to be a minimum of 4.0%. As of June 30, 2010, the interest rate on the FMCC Facility was 5.5%, before considering the applicable incentives.

 

Real Estate Credit Facility

 

In 2007, the Company entered into a five-year term real estate credit facility (the “Mortgage Facility”) that matures in March 2012. The Mortgage Facility provides a maximum commitment of $235.0 million of financing for real estate expansion and is syndicated with nine financial institutions including three manufacturer affiliates. The proceeds of the Mortgage Facility are used for acquisitions of real property associated with the Company’s dealerships and other operations. At the Company’s option, any loan under the Mortgage Facility will bear interest at a rate equal to (i) one month LIBOR plus 1.05% or (ii) the Base Rate as defined in the facility agreement. The interest rate of the Mortgage Facility as of June 30, 2010 was 1.4%. Prior to the maturity of the Mortgage Facility, quarterly principal payments are required for each loan outstanding under the facility at an amount equal to one-eightieth of the original principal amount, with any remaining unpaid principal amount due at the end of the term. The Company capitalized $1.3 million of related debt financing costs that are being amortized over the term of the facility, of which $0.8 million was amortized as of June 30, 2010.

 

The Mortgage Facility is guaranteed by the Company and essentially all of the existing and future direct and indirect domestic subsidiaries of the Company that guarantee or are required to guarantee the Company’s Revolving Credit Facility. Each loan is secured by real property (and improvements related thereto) specified by the Company and located at or near a vehicle dealership operated by a subsidiary of the Company or otherwise used or to be used by a vehicle dealership operated by a subsidiary of the Company.

 

As of June 30, 2010, the Company was entitled to (i) sell any property subject to the facility on fair and reasonable terms in an arm’s length transaction, (ii) remove it from the facility, (iii) repay in full the entire outstanding balance of the loan relating to such sold property, and then (iv) increase the available borrowings under the Mortgage Facility by the amount of such loan repayment, so long as no default existed. On July 13, 2010, the Mortgage Facility was amended to require that repayments of outstanding loan balances, other than scheduled principal payments, would immediately and permanently reduce the total $235.0 million commitment. Subsequently, there have been no repayments of outstanding loan balances, within the scope of this amendment.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company paid down $29.2 million in principal payments against the Mortgage Facility, of which $24.2 million was from the proceeds of the sale of property associated with a dealership disposition in June 2010 (see Note 13). As of June 30, 2010, borrowings under the facility totaled $163.5 million, with $9.2 million recorded as a current maturity of long-term debt in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets, and available borrowings from the Mortgage Facility totaled $71.5 million.

 

The Mortgage Facility contains certain covenants, including financial ratios that must be complied with: fixed charge coverage; senior secured leverage; dispositions of financed properties; ownership of equity interests in a lessor subsidiary; and occupancy or sublease of any financed property. As of June 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all applicable covenants and ratios under the Mortgage Facility.

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

Other Credit Facilities

 

The Company has a credit facility with BMW Financial Services for financing of the new, used and rental vehicle inventories of its U.K. operations. This facility bears interest of a base rate, plus a surcharge that varies based upon the type of vehicle being financed. As of June 30, 2010, the interest rates charged for borrowings under this facility ranged from 1.1% to 4.5%.

 

Excluding rental vehicles financed through the Revolving Credit Facility, financing for rental vehicles is typically obtained directly from the automobile manufacturers. These financing arrangements generally require small monthly payments and mature in varying amounts throughout 2010 and 2011. As of June 30, 2010, the interest rate charged on borrowings related to the Company’s rental vehicle fleet ranged from 1.2% to 6.8%. Rental vehicles are typically moved to used vehicle inventory when they are removed from rental service and repayment of the borrowing is required at that time. The Company also receives interest assistance from certain automobile manufacturers. The assistance has ranged from 49.9% to 87.0% of the Company’s floorplan interest expense over the past three years.

 

 

Long-term debt consists of the following:

 

 

2.25% Convertible Senior Notes

 

The Company determined the fair value of its 2.25% Notes using the estimated effective interest rate for similar debt with no convertible features. The original effective interest rate of 7.5% was estimated by comparing debt issuances from companies with similar credit ratings during the same annual period as the Company. The effective interest rate differs from the 7.5%, due to the impact of underwriter fees associated with this issuance that were capitalized as an additional discount to the 2.25% Notes and are being amortized to interest expense through 2016. The effective interest rate may change in the future as a result of future repurchases of the 2.25% Notes. The Company utilized a ten-year term for the assessment of the fair value of its 2.25% Notes. As of June 30, 2010 and

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

December 31, 2009 the carrying value of the 2.25% Notes, related discount and equity component consisted of the following:

 

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, the contractual interest expense and the discount amortization, which is recorded as interest expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations, were as follows:

 

 

 

 

There were no repurchases of the 2.25% Notes during the six months ended June 30, 2010, but during the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company repurchased $36.7 million par value of the 2.25% Notes for $17.3 million in cash and realized a net gain of $8.2 million, which is included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. In conjunction with the repurchases, $11.1 million of unamortized discount, underwriters’ fees and debt issuance costs were written off. The unamortized cost of the related purchased options (the “2.25% Purchased Options”) acquired at the time the repurchased 2.25% Notes were issued, $11.8 million, which was deductible as original issue discount for tax purposes, was taken into account in determining the Company’s tax gain. Accordingly, the Company recorded a proportionate reduction in its deferred tax assets. No value was attributed to the equity component of the 2.25% Notes at the time of the redemption and, therefore, no adjustment to additional paid-in-capital was recognized.

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

3.00% Convertible Senior Notes

 

On March 16, 2010, the Company issued $100.0 million aggregate principal amount of the 3.00% Notes at par in a private offering to qualified institutional buyers pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). On April 1, 2010, the underwriters of the 3.00% Notes exercised their full over-allotment option, and the Company issued an additional $15.0 million aggregate principal amount of 3.00% Notes. The 3.00% Notes will bear interest at a rate of 3.00% per annum until maturity. Interest on the 3.00% Notes will accrue from March 22, 2010. Interest will be payable semiannually in arrears on March 15 and September 15 of each year, beginning September 15, 2010. The 3.00% Notes mature on March 15, 2020, unless earlier repurchased or converted in accordance with their terms prior to such date.

 

The 3.00% Notes are convertible into cash and, if applicable, common stock based on an initial conversion rate of 25.8987 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the 3.00% Notes (which is equal to an initial conversion price of approximately $38.61 per common share) subject to adjustment, on the business day preceding September 15, 2019, under the following circumstances: (1) during any fiscal quarter (and only during such fiscal quarter) beginning after June 30, 2010, if the last reported sale price of the Company’s common stock for at least 20 trading days in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding fiscal quarter is equal to or more than 130% of the applicable conversion price per share (such threshold closing price initially being $50.193); (2) during the five business day period after any ten consecutive trading day period in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of 3.00% Notes for each day of the ten day trading period was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of the Company’s common stock and the conversion rate of the 3.00% Notes on that day; and (3) upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions set forth in the indenture, dated March 22, 2010, between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Trustee, which governs the 3.00% Notes (the “Indenture”). Upon conversion, a holder will receive an amount in cash and common shares of the Company’s common stock, determined in the manner set forth in the Indenture. Upon any conversion of the 3.00% Notes, the Company will deliver to converting holders a settlement amount comprised of cash and, if applicable, shares of the Company’s common stock, based on a conversion value determined by multiplying the then applicable conversion rate by a volume weighted price of the Company’s common stock on each trading day in a specified 25 trading day observation period. In general, as described more fully in the Indenture, converting holders will receive, in respect of each $1,000 principal amount of notes being converted, the conversion value in cash up to $1,000 and the excess, if any, of the conversion value over $1,000 in shares of the Company’s common stock.

 

The Company may not redeem the 3.00% Notes prior to the maturity date. Holders of the 3.00% Notes may require the Company to repurchase all or a portion of the 3.00% Notes on or after September 15, 2019. If the Company experiences specified types of fundamental changes, as defined in the Indenture, holders of 3.00% Notes may require the Company to repurchase the 3.00% Notes. Any repurchase of the 3.00% Notes pursuant to this provision will be for cash at a price equal to 100% of the principal amount of the 3.00% Notes to be repurchased plus any accrued and unpaid interest to, but excluding, the purchase date. Additionally, in the event of a make-whole fundamental change, as defined in the Indenture, the holders of the 3.00% Notes may be entitled to a make-whole premium in the form of an increase in the conversion rate.

 

The net proceeds from the issuance of the 3.00% Notes were used to redeem the Company’s then outstanding 8.25% Senior Subordinated Notes (the “8.25% Notes”) which were redeemed on March 30, 2010 at a redemption price of 102.75% plus accrued interest, and to pay $16.6 million net cost of the convertible note hedge transactions (after such cost is partially offset by the proceeds to the Company from the sale of the warrant transactions described below). Underwriters’ fees, recorded as a reduction of the 3.00% Notes balance, totaled $3.5 million and are being amortized over a period of ten years. The amount to be amortized each period is calculated using the effective interest method. Debt issues costs totaled $0.5 million and are also being amortized over a period of ten years using the effective interest method.

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

The 3.00% Notes rank equal in right of payment to all of the Company’s other existing and future senior indebtedness. The 3.00% Notes are not guaranteed by any of the Company’s subsidiaries and, accordingly, are structurally subordinated to all of the indebtedness and other liabilities of the Company’s subsidiaries. The 3.00% Notes will also be effectively subordinated to all of the Company’s secured indebtedness.

 

In connection with the issuance of the 3.00% Notes, the Company purchased ten-year call options on its common stock (the “3.00% Purchased Options”). Under the terms of the 3.00% Purchased Options, which become exercisable upon conversion of the 3.00% Notes, the Company has the right to purchase a total of 3.0 million shares of its common stock at a purchase price of $38.61 per share. The total cost of the 3.00% Purchased Options was $45.9 million, which was recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in-capital in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. The cost of the 3.00% Purchased Options will be deductible as original issue discount for income tax purposes over the life of the 3.00% Notes (ten years); therefore, the Company has established a deferred tax asset, with a corresponding increase to additional paid-in capital, in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.

 

In addition to the purchase of the 3.00% Purchased Options, the Company sold warrants in separate transactions (the “3.00% Warrants”). The 3.00% Warrants have a ten-year term and enable the holders to acquire shares of the Company’s common stock from the Company. The 3.00% Warrants are exercisable for a maximum of 3.0 million shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $56.74 per share, subject to adjustment for quarterly dividends, liquidation, bankruptcy, or a change in control of the Company and other conditions, including a failure by the Company to deliver registered securities to the purchasers upon exercise. Subject to these adjustments, the maximum amount of shares of the Company’s common stock that could be required to be issued under the 3.00% Warrants is 5.3 million shares. On exercise of the 3.00% Warrants, the Company will settle the difference between the then market price and the strike price of the 3.00% Warrants in shares of the Company’s common stock. The proceeds from the sale of the 3.00% Warrants were $29.3 million, which were recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet at June 30, 2010.

 

The 3.00% Purchased Options and 3.00% Warrants transactions were designed to increase the conversion price per share of the Company’s common stock from $38.61 to $56.74 (an 80% premium to the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date that the 3.00% Notes were priced to investors) and, therefore, mitigate the potential dilution of the Company’s common stock upon conversion of the 3.00% Notes, if any.

 

For dilutive earnings per share calculations, the Company will be required to include the dilutive effect, if applicable, of the net shares issuable under the 3.00% Notes and the 3.00% Warrants. Since the average price of the Company’s common stock from the date of issuance through June 30, 2010, was less than $38.61, no net shares were issuable under the 3.00% Notes and the 3.00% Warrants. Although the 3.00% Purchased Options have the economic benefit of decreasing the dilutive effect of the 3.00% Notes, such shares are excluded from Group 1’s dilutive shares outstanding as the impact would be anti-dilutive.

 

The Company determined the fair value of its 3.00% Notes using the estimated effective interest rate for similar debt with no convertible features. The interest rate of 8.25% was estimated by receiving a range of quotes from the underwriters of the 3.00% Notes for the estimated rate that the Company could reasonably expect to issue non-convertible debt for the same tenure. The effective interest rate differs from the 8.25%, due to the impact of underwriter fees associated with this issuance that were capitalized as an additional discount to the 3.00% Notes and are being amortized to interest expense through 2020. The effective interest rate may change in the future as a result of future repurchases of the 3.00% Notes. The Company utilized a ten-year term for the assessment of the fair value

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

of its 3.00% Notes. As of June 30, 2010, the carrying value of the 3.00% Notes, related discount and equity component consisted of the following:

 

 

 

 

8.25% Senior Subordinated Notes

 

On March 30, 2010, the Company completed the redemption of its then outstanding $74.6 million face value of 8.25% Notes at a redemption price of 102.75% of the principal amount of the notes, utilizing proceeds from its 3.00% Notes offering. The Company incurred a $3.9 million pretax charge in completing the redemption, consisting primarily of a $2.1 million redemption premium, a $1.5 million write-off of unamortized bond discount and deferred costs and $0.3 million of other debt extinguishment costs. Total cash used in completing the redemption, excluding accrued interest of $0.8 million, was $77.0 million.

 

 

The periodic interest rates of the Revolving Credit Facility and the Mortgage Facility are indexed to one-month LIBOR rates plus an associated company credit risk rate. In order to stabilize earnings exposure related to fluctuations in these rates, the Company employs an interest rate hedging strategy, whereby it enters into arrangements with various financial institutional counterparties with investment grade credit ratings, swapping its variable interest rate exposure for a fixed interest rate over terms not to exceed the Revolving Credit Facility and the Mortgage Facility.

 

The Company reflects the current fair value of all derivatives on its Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company measures its interest rate derivative instruments utilizing an income approach valuation technique, converting future amounts of cash flows to a single present value in order to obtain a transfer exit price within the bid and ask spread that is most representative of the fair value of its derivative instruments. In measuring fair value, the Company utilizes the option-pricing Black-Scholes present value technique for all of its derivative instruments.

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

This option-pricing technique utilizes a LIBOR forward yield curve, obtained from an independent external service provider, matched to the identical maturity term of the instrument being measured. Observable inputs utilized in the income approach valuation technique incorporate identical contractual notional amounts, fixed coupon rates, periodic terms for interest payments and contract maturity. The Company has determined the valuation measurement inputs of these derivative instruments to maximize the use of observable inputs that market participants would use in pricing similar or identical instruments and market data obtained from independent sources, which is readily observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the derivative instrument. Further, the valuation measurement inputs minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Accordingly, the Company has classified the derivatives within Level 2 of the hierarchy framework as described in ASC 820.

 

The related gains or losses on these interest rate derivatives are deferred in stockholders’ equity as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. These deferred gains and losses are recognized in income in the period in which the related items being hedged are recognized in expense. However, to the extent that the change in value of a derivative contract does not perfectly offset the change in the value of the items being hedged, that ineffective portion is immediately recognized in other income or expense. Monthly contractual settlements of these swap positions are recognized as floorplan or other interest expense in the Company’s accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. All of the Company’s interest rate hedges are designated as cash flow hedges.

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company did not enter into any new interest rate derivatives. As of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company held interest rate swaps of $550.0 million in notional value that fixed its underlying LIBOR rate at a weighted average rate of 4.7%. At June 30, 2010, all of the Company’s derivative contracts were determined to be effective, and no significant ineffective portion was recognized in income. Included in its Consolidated Balance Sheets as liabilities from interest rate risk management activities, the fair value of the Company’s derivative financial instruments was $26.8 million and $30.6 million as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Three of the Company’s interest rate swaps with aggregate notional amounts of $250.0 million expire in December 2010. As such, the fair value of these instruments is classified as a current liability in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet. Included in accumulated other comprehensive loss at June 30, 2010 and 2009 are unrealized losses, net of income taxes, totaling $16.7 million and $23.4 million, respectively, related to these hedges. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2010, the impact of these interest rate hedges increased floorplan interest expense by $5.3 million and $10.4 million, respectively; for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, the impact of these interest rate hedges increased floorplan interest expense by $5.0 million and $10.6 million, respectively. Total floorplan interest expense was $8.6 million and $7.9 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and $16.2 million and $16.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

 

The following table presents the impact during the current and comparative prior year period for the Company’s derivative financial instruments on its Consolidated Statements of Operations and Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company had no material gains or losses related to ineffectiveness or amounts excluded from effectiveness testing recognized in the Statements of Operations for either the six months ended June 30, 2010 or 2009, respectively.

 

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

The amount expected to be reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into earnings (through floorplan interest expense or other interest expense) in the next twelve months is $13.8 million.

 

 

The Company’s property and equipment consists of the following:

 

 

During the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company incurred $7.7 million of capital expenditures for the construction of new or expanded facilities and the purchase of equipment and other fixed assets in the maintenance of the Company’s dealerships and facilities.

 

 

Guidance primarily codified within ASC 820, defines fair value as the price that would be received in the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820 requires disclosure of the extent to which fair value is used to measure financial and non-financial assets and liabilities, the inputs utilized in calculating valuation measurements, and the effect of the measurement of significant unobservable inputs on earnings, or changes in net assets, as of the measurement date. ASC 820 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy based upon the transparency of inputs utilized in the measurement and valuation of financial assets or liabilities as of the measurement date:

 

 

The Company evaluated its financial and non-financial assets and liabilities for those that met the criteria of the disclosure requirements and fair value framework of ASC 820 as discussed below. See Note 8, “Derivative Instruments and Risk Management Activities” for disclosures related to interest rate derivatives.

 

Marketable Securities and Debt Instruments

 

The Company accounts for its investments in marketable securities and debt instruments based on the guidance described in ASC Topic No. 320, “Investments-Debt and Equity Securities” (“ASC 320”), which established

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

standards of financial accounting and reporting for investments in equity instruments that have readily determinable fair values and for all investments in debt securities. Accordingly, the Company designates these investments as available-for-sale, measures them at fair value and classifies them as either cash and cash equivalents or other assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets based upon maturity terms and certain contractual restrictions.

 

The Company maintains multiple trust accounts comprised of money market funds with short-term investments in marketable securities, such as U.S. government securities, commercial paper and bankers acceptances, that have maturities of less than three months. The Company determined that the valuation measurement inputs of these marketable securities represent unadjusted quoted prices in active markets and, accordingly, has classified such investments within Level 1 of the hierarchy framework as described in ASC 820.

 

The Company, within its trust accounts, also holds investments in debt instruments, such as government obligations and other fixed income securities. The debt securities are measured based upon quoted market prices utilizing public information, independent external valuations from pricing services or third-party advisors. Accordingly, the Company has concluded the valuation measurement inputs of these debt securities to represent, at their lowest level, quoted market prices for identical or similar assets in markets where there are few transactions for the assets and has categorized such investments within Level 2 of the hierarchy framework. In addition, the Company periodically invests in unsecured, corporate demand obligations with manufacturer-affiliated finance companies, which bear interest at a variable rate and are redeemable on demand by the Company. Therefore, the Company has classified these demand obligations as cash and cash equivalents on the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The Company determined that the valuation measurement inputs of these instruments include inputs other than quoted market prices, that are observable or that can be corroborated by observable data by correlation. Accordingly, the Company has classified these instruments within Level 2 of the hierarchy framework.

 

Further, the Company holds real estate investments, primarily associated with non-operational dealership facilities, that qualify as held-for-sale assets. Upon the initial categorization of an asset as held-for-sale, the Company adjusts the carrying value of the asset if an impairment exists, based upon an estimate or fair value that utilizes third-party appraisals and brokers’ opinions of value, and suspends depreciation of the asset. Subsequent impairment evaluations, which are required when an indicator exists that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable, are based on measurements of fair value utilizing third-party appraisals, brokers’ opinions of value and arms-length transactions. During the three months ended June 30, 2010, the Company recognized a pretax impairment charge of $1.5 million, primarily as a result of a letter of intent that was entered into with a third party to sell one of these real estate investments.

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

The fair value of the Company’s short-term investments, assets held-for-sale, debt securities and interest rate derivative financial instruments as of June 30, 2010 were as follows:

 

 

 

Legal Proceedings

 

From time to time, the Company’s dealerships are named in various types of litigation involving customer claims, employment matters, class action claims, purported class action claims, as well as claims involving the manufacturer of automobiles, contractual disputes and other matters arising in the ordinary course of business. Due to the nature of the automotive retailing business, the Company may be involved in legal proceedings or suffer losses that could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business. In the normal course of business, the Company is required to respond to customer, employee and other third-party complaints. Amounts that have been accrued or paid related to the settlement of litigation are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. In addition, the manufacturers of the vehicles that the Company sells and services have audit rights allowing them to review the validity of amounts claimed for incentive, rebate or warranty-related items and charge the Company back for amounts determined to be invalid rewards under the manufacturers’ programs, subject to the Company’s right to appeal any such decision. Amounts that have been accrued or paid related to the settlement of manufacturer chargebacks of recognized incentives and rebates are included in cost of sales in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations, while such amounts for manufacturer chargebacks of recognized warranty-related items are included as a reduction of revenues in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations.

 

In June 2010, Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc. (“Toyota”) filed a lawsuit against the Company in the U.S. District Court for the District of South Carolina, seeking a declaratory judgment to (i) withhold its consent to the sale of certain Toyota/Scion and Lexus dealerships in Charleston, South Carolina, and (ii) require the Company to indemnify Toyota for any and all claims asserted by the seller if the Court determined that Toyota could not lawfully withhold its consent. On July 13, 2010, prior to Group 1 filing its answer to respond to such claims, Toyota dismissed its lawsuit because the seller elected to terminate the purchase agreement with Group 1 and sell its dealerships to a third party which rendered Toyota’s lawsuit moot.

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

The Company is not party to any legal proceedings, including class action lawsuits that, individually or in the aggregate, are reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial condition or cash flows of the Company. However, the results of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, and an unfavorable resolution of one or more of these matters could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

 

Other Matters

 

The Company, acting through its subsidiaries, is the lessee under many real estate leases that provide for the use by the Company’s subsidiaries of their respective dealership premises. Pursuant to these leases, the Company’s subsidiaries generally agree to indemnify the lessor and other parties from certain liabilities arising as a result of the use of the leased premises, including environmental liabilities, or a breach of the lease by the lessee. Additionally, from time to time, the Company enters into agreements in connection with the sale of assets or businesses in which it agrees to indemnify the purchaser, or other parties, from certain liabilities or costs arising in connection with the assets or business. Also, in the ordinary course of business in connection with purchases or sales of goods and services, the Company enters into agreements that may contain indemnification provisions. In the event that an indemnification claim is asserted, liability would be limited by the terms of the applicable agreement.

 

From time to time, primarily in connection with dealership dispositions, the Company’s subsidiaries assign or sublet to the dealership purchaser the subsidiaries’ interests in any real property leases associated with such dealerships. In general, the Company’s subsidiaries retain responsibility for the performance of certain obligations under such leases to the extent that the assignee or sublessee does not perform, whether such performance is required prior to or following the assignment or subletting of the lease. Additionally, the Company and its subsidiaries generally remain subject to the terms of any guarantees made by the Company and its subsidiaries in connection with such leases. Although the Company generally has indemnification rights against the assignee or sublessee in the event of non-performance under these leases, as well as certain defenses, and the Company presently has no reason to believe that it or its subsidiaries will be called on to perform under any such assigned leases or subleases, the Company estimates that lessee rental payment obligations during the remaining terms of these leases were $28.0 million as of June 30, 2010. Of the total obligation, $7.6 million of the remaining rental payment obligations are associated with facilities operated as a Chrysler or General Motor Brand dealership. The Company’s exposure under these leases is difficult to estimate and there can be no assurance that any performance of the Company or its subsidiaries required under these leases would not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and cash flows. The Company and its subsidiaries also may be called on to perform other obligations under these leases, such as environmental remediation of the leased premises or repair of the leased premises upon termination of the lease. However, the Company presently has no reason to believe that it or its subsidiaries will be called on to so perform and such obligations cannot be quantified at this time.

 

In the ordinary course of business, the Company is subject to numerous laws and regulations, including automotive, environmental, health and safety, and other laws and regulations. The Company does not anticipate that the costs of such compliance will have a material adverse effect on its business, consolidated results of operations, cash flows, or financial condition, although such outcome is possible given the nature of its operations and the extensive legal and regulatory framework applicable to its business. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, which was signed into law on July 21, 2010, establishes a new consumer financial protection agency with broad regulatory powers. Although automotive dealers are generally excluded, the Dodd-Frank Act could lead to additional, indirect regulation of automotive dealers through its regulation of automotive finance companies and other financial institutions. In addition, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which was signed into law on March 23, 2010, has the potential to increase its future annual employee health care costs. Further, new laws and regulations, particularly at the federal level, in other areas may be enacted, which could also materially adversely impact its business. The Company does not have any material known environmental commitments or contingencies.

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

 

The following table provides a reconciliation of net income to comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009:

 

 

 

On March 1, 2010, the Company acquired two BMW/Mini dealerships in the Southeast region of the U.K. with anticipated annual revenues of $161.5 million. And, in April 2010, the Company acquired a Toyota/Scion dealership and an Audi dealership located in South Carolina, with expected aggregate annual revenues of $69.5 million. Consideration paid for these dealerships totaled $34.6 million, including the amounts paid for vehicle inventory, parts inventory, equipment, and furniture and fixtures, as well as the purchase of associated real estate. The vehicle inventory was subsequently financed through borrowings under the Company’s credit facility with BMW Financial Services or the Floorplan Line.

 

In January 2010, the Company was awarded two Sprinter franchises located in two separate Mercedes-Benz stores in Georgia and New York. The Company was also granted a Mini franchise in May 2010 located in a BMW store in Texas.

 

During the first six months of 2010, the company disposed of a Ford-Lincoln-Mercury dealership in Florida along with the associated real estate. Gross consideration received was $35.0 million, including amounts used to repay the Company’s floorplan notes payable associated with the vehicle inventory sold and the respective Mortgage Facility financing balance. As a result, the Company recognized a $5.1 million pretax loss, which is included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the accompanying Consolidated Statement of Operations.

 

During the first six months of 2009, the Company disposed of two other franchises: a Volvo franchise located in New York and a Ford franchise, including the associated real estate, also located in Florida. Consideration received for the two franchises totaled $20.8 million, including amounts used to repay the Company’s floorplan notes payable associated with the vehicle inventory sold and the respective Mortgage Facility financing balance.

 

 

The following tables include the Condensed Consolidating Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2009, and the related Condensed Consolidating Statements of Operations and Cash Flows for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, for Group 1 Automotive, Inc.’s (as issuer of the 8.25% Notes) guarantor subsidiaries and non-guarantor subsidiaries (representing foreign entities). On March 30, 2010, the Company completed the redemption of its then outstanding 8.25% Notes, therefore, only those periods during which the 8.25% Notes were outstanding have been presented. The condensed consolidating financial information includes certain allocations of balance sheet, statement of operations and cash flows items that are not necessarily indicative of the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of these entities on a stand-alone basis.

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET
December 31, 2009

 

GROUP 1 AUTOMOTIVE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

 

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

Three Months Ended June 30, 2009