Form 10-Q
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2010
Commission File Number: 001-32739
HealthSpring, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
20-1821898 |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
9009 Carothers Parkway |
|
|
Suite 501 |
|
|
Franklin, Tennessee
|
|
37067 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
(Zip Code) |
(615) 291-7000
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated Filer þ
|
|
Accelerated Filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated Filer o
|
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the latest practicable date.
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at October 27, 2010 |
Common Stock, Par Value $0.01 Per Share |
|
57,239,061 Shares |
Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1: Financial Statements
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Assets
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
238,238 |
|
|
$ |
439,423 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
85,972 |
|
|
|
92,442 |
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,883 |
|
Investment securities held to maturity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,965 |
|
Funds due for the benefit of members |
|
|
4,847 |
|
|
|
4,028 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
7,062 |
|
|
|
6,973 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
8,788 |
|
|
|
9,586 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
344,907 |
|
|
|
575,300 |
|
Investment securities available for sale |
|
|
267,099 |
|
|
|
13,574 |
|
Investment securities held to maturity |
|
|
40,691 |
|
|
|
38,463 |
|
Property and equipment, net |
|
|
30,015 |
|
|
|
30,316 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
624,507 |
|
|
|
624,507 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
190,368 |
|
|
|
203,147 |
|
Restricted investments |
|
|
21,553 |
|
|
|
16,375 |
|
Risk corridor receivable from CMS |
|
|
7,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
Funds due for the benefit of members |
|
|
21,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets |
|
|
16,867 |
|
|
|
6,585 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,564,514 |
|
|
$ |
1,508,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders Equity
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical claims liability |
|
$ |
183,463 |
|
|
$ |
202,308 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses and other |
|
|
61,807 |
|
|
|
50,954 |
|
Risk corridor payable to CMS |
|
|
2,921 |
|
|
|
2,176 |
|
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
|
43,069 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
265,691 |
|
|
|
298,507 |
|
Long-term debt, less current portion |
|
|
148,750 |
|
|
|
193,904 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
73,762 |
|
|
|
80,434 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
5,189 |
|
|
|
5,966 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
493,392 |
|
|
|
578,811 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $.01 par value, 180,000,000 shares
authorized, 61,293,809 issued and 57,239,510
outstanding at September 30, 2010, and 60,758,958
issued and 57,560,350 outstanding at December 31,
2009 |
|
|
613 |
|
|
|
608 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
556,003 |
|
|
|
548,481 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
572,121 |
|
|
|
428,765 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net |
|
|
4,368 |
|
|
|
(1,044 |
) |
Treasury stock, at cost, 4,054,299 shares at
September 30, 2010, and 3,198,608 shares at
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
(61,983 |
) |
|
|
(47,354 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
1,071,122 |
|
|
|
929,456 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,564,514 |
|
|
$ |
1,508,267 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
1
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium revenue |
|
$ |
712,658 |
|
|
$ |
649,795 |
|
|
$ |
2,218,378 |
|
|
$ |
1,955,842 |
|
Management and other fees |
|
|
10,413 |
|
|
|
9,108 |
|
|
|
31,191 |
|
|
|
29,065 |
|
Investment income |
|
|
2,151 |
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
4,574 |
|
|
|
3,532 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
725,222 |
|
|
|
659,780 |
|
|
|
2,254,143 |
|
|
|
1,988,439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical expense |
|
|
561,823 |
|
|
|
519,478 |
|
|
|
1,779,275 |
|
|
|
1,607,481 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
67,664 |
|
|
|
65,851 |
|
|
|
210,410 |
|
|
|
200,408 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,513 |
|
|
|
7,782 |
|
|
|
22,810 |
|
|
|
22,948 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3,150 |
|
|
|
3,762 |
|
|
|
15,375 |
|
|
|
12,014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
640,150 |
|
|
|
596,873 |
|
|
|
2,027,870 |
|
|
|
1,842,851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
85,072 |
|
|
|
62,907 |
|
|
|
226,273 |
|
|
|
145,588 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(31,292 |
) |
|
|
(20,593 |
) |
|
|
(82,917 |
) |
|
|
(50,772 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
53,780 |
|
|
$ |
42,314 |
|
|
$ |
143,356 |
|
|
$ |
94,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
2.52 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
2.51 |
|
|
$ |
1.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
56,482,679 |
|
|
|
54,518,162 |
|
|
|
56,872,071 |
|
|
|
54,502,081 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
56,577,063 |
|
|
|
54,700,390 |
|
|
|
57,058,075 |
|
|
|
54,653,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
2
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
143,356 |
|
|
$ |
94,816 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by
operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
22,810 |
|
|
|
22,948 |
|
Amortization of deferred financing cost |
|
|
1,407 |
|
|
|
1,785 |
|
Amortization on bond investments |
|
|
2,187 |
|
|
|
749 |
|
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliate |
|
|
(277 |
) |
|
|
(281 |
) |
Share-based compensation |
|
|
6,659 |
|
|
|
7,513 |
|
Deferred tax benefit |
|
|
(9,883 |
) |
|
|
(8,794 |
) |
Write-off of deferred financing fees |
|
|
5,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
Increase (decrease) in cash due to: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
18,962 |
|
|
|
3,446 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
|
|
(12,266 |
) |
|
|
(2,231 |
) |
Medical claims liability |
|
|
(18,845 |
) |
|
|
10,228 |
|
Accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other current liabilities |
|
|
1,357 |
|
|
|
(6,766 |
) |
Risk corridor payable to/receivable from CMS |
|
|
(6,263 |
) |
|
|
(7,298 |
) |
Other |
|
|
1,485 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
155,768 |
|
|
|
116,209 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional consideration paid on acquisition |
|
|
(610 |
) |
|
|
(910 |
) |
Proceeds received on disposition |
|
|
|
|
|
|
297 |
|
Purchases of property and equipment |
|
|
(9,120 |
) |
|
|
(11,519 |
) |
Purchases of investment securities |
|
|
(341,081 |
) |
|
|
(39,766 |
) |
Maturities of investment securities |
|
|
56,591 |
|
|
|
35,415 |
|
Sales of investment securities |
|
|
55,898 |
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of restricted investments |
|
|
(43,182 |
) |
|
|
(16,015 |
) |
Maturities of restricted investments |
|
|
37,973 |
|
|
|
11,346 |
|
Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliate |
|
|
262 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(243,269 |
) |
|
|
(20,956 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds received for the benefit of the members |
|
|
633,577 |
|
|
|
494,591 |
|
Funds withdrawn for the benefit of members |
|
|
(655,895 |
) |
|
|
(458,465 |
) |
Proceeds received on issuance of debt |
|
|
200,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on long-term debt |
|
|
(270,722 |
) |
|
|
(23,859 |
) |
Excess tax benefit from stock options exercised |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from stock options exercised |
|
|
867 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Purchase of treasury stock |
|
|
(14,304 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payment of debt issue costs |
|
|
(7,334 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(113,684 |
) |
|
|
12,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
(201,185 |
) |
|
|
107,526 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
439,423 |
|
|
|
282,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
238,238 |
|
|
$ |
389,766 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest |
|
$ |
7,609 |
|
|
$ |
10,454 |
|
Cash paid for taxes |
|
$ |
88,893 |
|
|
$ |
62,992 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(1) Organization and Basis of Presentation
HealthSpring, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Company), was organized in October 2004 and
began operations in March 2005 in connection with a recapitalization transaction accounted for as a
purchase. The Company is a managed care organization whose primary focus is on Medicare, the
federal government sponsored health insurance program for United States citizens aged 65 and older,
qualifying disabled persons, and persons suffering from end-stage renal disease. Through its health
maintenance organization (HMO) and regulated insurance subsidiaries, the Company operates
Medicare Advantage health plans in the states of Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Mississippi,
Tennessee, and Texas and offers Medicare Part D prescription drug plans (PDP) on a national basis. The
Company also provides management services to physician practices.
The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements are unaudited and should be read
in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of HealthSpring, Inc.
as of and for the year ended December 31, 2009, included in the Companys Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the
SEC) on February 11, 2010 (the 2009 Form 10-K).
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect the Companys
financial position as of September 30, 2010, the Companys results of operations for the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and cash flows for the nine months ended September
30, 2010 and 2009. Certain 2009 amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2010
presentation.
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial
information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). Accordingly, certain information
and footnote disclosures normally included in complete financial statements prepared in accordance
with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations applicable to
interim financial statements. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments (including normally recurring accruals)
necessary to present fairly the Companys financial position at September 30, 2010, its results of
operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, and its cash flows for
the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009.
The results of operations for the 2010 interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the
operating results that may be expected for the full year ending December 31, 2010.
The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements requires management of the
Company to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amount of assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the period. The most
significant item subject to estimates and assumptions is the actuarial calculation for obligations
related to medical claims. Other significant items subject to estimates and assumptions include the
Companys estimated risk adjustment payments receivable from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid
Services (CMS), the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets, the useful life of
definite-lived intangible assets, the valuation of debt securities carried at fair value, and
certain amounts recorded related to the Companys Part D operations, including risk corridor adjustments and rebates. Actual results could differ
significantly from those estimates and assumptions.
The Companys regulated insurance subsidiaries are restricted from making distributions
without appropriate regulatory notifications and approvals or to the extent such distributions
would cause non-compliance with statutory capital requirements. At September 30, 2010, $409.2
million of the Companys $567.6 million of cash, cash equivalents, investment securities, and
restricted investments were held by the Companys insurance subsidiaries and subject to these
restrictions.
Agreement to Acquire Bravo Health
On August 26, 2010, the Company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all of the
outstanding capital stock of Bravo Health, Inc. (Bravo), an operator of Medicare Advantage
coordinated care plans in Pennsylvania, the Mid-Atlantic region, and Texas, and Medicare Part D
stand-alone prescription drug plans in 43 states and the District of Columbia. As of September 30,
2010, Bravo had Medicare Advantage membership of 103,044 and stand-alone PDP membership of 293,920.
4
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
The
Company will acquire Bravo, a privately held company, for
approximately $545.0 million in cash, subject to adjustment.
The Company has agreed with its existing lenders and certain additional lenders to amend its
existing credit facility to provide for, among other things, the acquisition financing.
As amended, the facility will provide for the following:
|
|
|
$355.0 million in term loan A indebtedness maturing in February 2015 comprised of: |
|
|
|
$175.0 million of term loan A indebtedness ($166.3 million of which is currently outstanding); |
|
|
|
|
$180.0 million of new term loan A indebtedness to be funded at the closing of the acquisition; |
|
|
|
$175.0 million revolving credit facility (currently undrawn and maturing in February 2014); and |
|
|
|
$200.0 million of new six-year term loan B indebtedness to be funded at the closing of the acquisition. |
The additional term loan indebtedness, availability under the existing $175.0 million
revolving credit facility, and cash on hand will be sufficient to fund the acquisition of Bravo.
See Note 12 for additional information regarding the new indebtedness.
The remaining material conditions to the closing of the Bravo acquisition primarily relate to
approvals by various state regulatory authorities.
(2) Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued new guidance for
determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity (VIE) and requires an enterprise to
perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprises variable interest or interests give it a
controlling financial interest in a VIE. The guidance requires an enterprise to assess whether it
has an implicit financial responsibility to ensure that a VIE operates as designed when determining
whether it has power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact the
entitys economic performance. The guidance also requires ongoing assessments of whether an
enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE, requires enhanced disclosures, and eliminates the
scope exclusion for qualifying special-purpose entities. The adoption of the new guidance on
January 1, 2010 did not impact the Companys financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2010, the Company adopted the FASBs updated guidance related to fair
value measurements and disclosures, which requires a reporting entity to disclose separately the
amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and to
describe the reasons for the transfers. In addition, in the reconciliation for fair value
measurements using significant unobservable inputs, or Level 3, a reporting entity should disclose
separately information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements. The updated guidance also
requires that an entity should provide fair value measurement disclosures for each class of assets
and liabilities and disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair
value for both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements for Level 2 and Level 3 fair
value measurements. The guidance is effective for interim or annual financial reporting periods
beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and
settlements in the roll forward activity in Level 3 fair value measurements, which are effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal
years. Therefore, the Company has not yet adopted the guidance with respect to the roll forward
activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. The adoption of the updated guidance for Levels 1 and
2 fair value measurements did not have an impact on the Companys consolidated results of
operations or financial condition.
5
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(3) Accounts Receivable
Accounts receivable at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Medicare premium receivables |
|
$ |
21,519 |
|
|
$ |
48,524 |
|
Rebates |
|
|
49,286 |
|
|
|
34,879 |
|
Due from providers |
|
|
15,264 |
|
|
|
10,320 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,665 |
|
|
|
2,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
89,734 |
|
|
|
96,123 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(3,762 |
) |
|
|
(3,681 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
85,972 |
|
|
$ |
92,442 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare premium receivables at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 include $18.6 million
and $44.1 million, respectively, of receivables from CMS related to the accrual of retroactive risk
adjustment payments. Accounts receivable relating to unpaid health plan enrollee premiums are
recorded during the period the Company is obligated to provide services to enrollees and do not
bear interest. The Company does not have any off-balance sheet credit exposure related to its
health plan enrollees.
Rebates for drug costs represent estimated rebates owed to the Company from prescription drug
companies. The Company has entered into contracts with certain drug manufacturers that provide for
rebates to the Company based on the utilization of specific prescription drugs by the Companys
members. Due from providers primarily includes management fees receivable as well as amounts owed
to the Company for the refund of certain medical expenses paid by the Company under risk sharing
agreements.
(4) Investment Securities
Investment securities, which consist primarily of debt securities, have been categorized as
either available for sale or held to maturity. Held to maturity securities are those securities
that the Company does not intend to sell, nor expect to be required to sell, prior to maturity. The
Company holds no trading securities. At September 30, 2010, investment securities are classified as
non-current assets based on the Companys intention to reinvest such assets upon sale or maturity
and to not use such assets in current operations. At December 31, 2009, the Company classified its
investment securities based upon maturity dates. Restricted investments include U.S. Government
securities, money market fund investments, deposits and certificates of deposit held by the various
state departments of insurance to whose jurisdiction the Companys subsidiaries are subject. These
restricted assets are recorded at amortized cost and classified as long-term regardless of the
contractual maturity date because of the restrictive nature of the states requirements.
Available for sale securities are recorded at fair value. Held to maturity debt securities are
recorded at amortized cost, adjusted for the amortization or accretion of premiums or discounts.
Unrealized gains and losses (net of applicable deferred taxes) on available for sale securities are
included as a component of stockholders equity and comprehensive income until realized from a sale
or other than temporary impairment. Realized gains and losses from the sale of securities are
determined on a specific identification basis. Purchases and sales of investments are recorded on
their trade dates. Dividend and interest income are recognized when earned.
There were no available for sale securities classified as current assets as of September 30,
2010. Available for sale securities classified as current assets at December 31, 2009 were as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
8,691 |
|
|
|
192 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,883 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Available for sale securities classified as non-current assets were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Government obligations |
|
$ |
10,196 |
|
|
|
187 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,383 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency obligations |
|
|
3,230 |
|
|
|
69 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate debt
securities |
|
|
88,784 |
|
|
|
3,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
(Residential) |
|
|
64,582 |
|
|
|
1,353 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other structured
securities |
|
|
13,343 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
80,135 |
|
|
|
1,466 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
81,587 |
|
|
|
13,407 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
13,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
260,270 |
|
|
|
6,843 |
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
267,099 |
|
|
$ |
13,407 |
|
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
(9 |
) |
|
|
13,574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were no held to maturity securities classified as current assets at September 30, 2010.
Held to maturity securities classified as current assets at December 31, 2009 were as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Government obligations |
|
$ |
1,154 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,155 |
|
Agency obligations |
|
|
3,225 |
|
|
|
16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,241 |
|
Corporate debt
securities |
|
|
6,416 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,490 |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
3,170 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,965 |
|
|
|
111 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,076 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held to maturity securities classified as non-current assets were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross |
|
|
Gross |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Holding |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Gains |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
Government obligations |
|
$ |
1,414 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,417 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agency obligations |
|
|
3,146 |
|
|
|
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,184 |
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,622 |
|
Corporate debt
securities |
|
|
13,375 |
|
|
|
306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,681 |
|
|
|
13,505 |
|
|
|
325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,830 |
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
(Residential) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,575 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,581 |
|
Municipal bonds |
|
|
22,756 |
|
|
|
828 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23,584 |
|
|
|
21,773 |
|
|
|
546 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
22,318 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
40,691 |
|
|
|
1,175 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41,866 |
|
|
$ |
38,463 |
|
|
|
889 |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
39,351 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized gains or losses related to investment securities for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2010 and 2009 were immaterial.
7
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Maturities of investments were as follows at September 30, 2010 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available for sale |
|
|
Held to maturity |
|
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
Amortized |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair Value |
|
|
Due within one year |
|
$ |
9,646 |
|
|
|
9,677 |
|
|
$ |
15,254 |
|
|
|
15,430 |
|
Due after one year through five years |
|
|
133,708 |
|
|
|
137,740 |
|
|
|
23,379 |
|
|
|
24,209 |
|
Due after five years through ten years |
|
|
29,497 |
|
|
|
30,377 |
|
|
|
2,058 |
|
|
|
2,227 |
|
Due after ten years |
|
|
9,494 |
|
|
|
9,538 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mortgage and asset-backed securities |
|
|
77,925 |
|
|
|
79,767 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
260,270 |
|
|
|
267,099 |
|
|
$ |
40,691 |
|
|
|
41,866 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized losses on investment securities and the fair value of the related securities,
aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a
continuous unrealized loss position, at September 30, 2010, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
More Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
(14 |
) |
|
|
6,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
6,255 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross unrealized losses on investment securities and the fair value of the related securities,
aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a
continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2009, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less Than |
|
|
More Than |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
12 Months |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
Fair |
|
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
Losses |
|
|
Value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal bonds |
|
$ |
(10 |
) |
|
|
1,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(10 |
) |
|
|
1,920 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company reviews fixed maturities and equity securities with a decline in fair value from
cost for impairment based on criteria that include duration and severity of decline; financial
viability and outlook of the issuer; and changes in the regulatory, economic and market environment
of the issuers industry or geographic region.
All issuers of securities the Company owned in an unrealized loss as of September 30, 2010
remain current on all contractual payments. The unrealized losses on investments were caused by an
increase in investment yields as a result of a widening of credit spreads. The contractual terms of
these investments do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than the
amortized cost of the investment. The Company determined that it did not intend to sell these
investments and that it was not more-likely-than-not to be required to sell these investments prior
to their recovery, thus these investments are not considered other-than-temporarily impaired.
(5) Fair Value Measurements
The Companys 2010 third quarter condensed consolidated balance sheet includes the following
financial instruments: cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, investment securities,
restricted investments, accounts payable, medical claims liabilities, funds due from CMS for the
benefit of members, and long-term debt. The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, funds due from
CMS for the benefit of members, accounts payable, and medical claims liabilities approximate their
fair value because of the relatively short period of time between the origination of these
instruments and their expected realization. The fair value of the Companys long-term debt
(including the current portion) was $162.9 million at September 30, 2010 and consisted solely of
bank debt.
8
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
Cash and cash equivalents consist of such items as certificates of deposit, money market
funds, and certain U.S. Government securities with an original maturity of three months or less.
The original cost of these assets approximates fair value due to their short-term maturity. In
February 2010, the Company terminated its interest rate swap agreements in connection with the
termination of the related credit agreement. See Note 8 Derivatives and Note 12 Debt. The
fair value of the Companys interest rate swaps at December 31, 2009 reflected a liability of
approximately $2.1 million and was included in other long term liabilities in the accompanying
condensed consolidated balance sheet. The fair values of available for sale securities is
determined by quoted market prices or pricing models developed using market data provided by a
third party vendor.
The following are the levels of the hierarchy as and a brief description of the type of
valuation information (inputs) that qualifies a financial asset for each level:
|
|
|
Level Input |
|
Input Definition |
Level I
|
|
Inputs are unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or
liabilities in active markets at the measurement date. |
|
|
|
Level II
|
|
Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level I that are
observable for the asset or liability through corroboration
with market data at the measurement date. |
|
|
|
Level III
|
|
Unobservable inputs that reflect managements best estimate of
what market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability at the measurement date. |
When quoted prices in active markets for identical assets are available, the Company uses
these quoted market prices to determine the fair value of financial assets and classifies these
assets as Level I. In other cases where a quoted market price for identical assets in an active
market is either not available or not observable, the Company obtains the fair value from a third
party vendor that uses pricing models, such as matrix pricing, to determine fair value. These
financial assets would then be classified as Level II. In the event quoted market prices were not
available, the Company would determine fair value using broker quotes or an internal analysis of
each investments financial statements and cash flow projections. In these instances, financial
assets would be classified based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the
valuation. Thus, financial assets might be classified in Level III even though there could be some
significant inputs that may be readily available.
There were no transfers to or from Levels I and II during the nine months ended September 30,
2010. The following tables summarize fair value measurements by level at September 30, 2010 and
December 31, 2009 for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
Level I |
|
|
Level II |
|
|
Level III |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
238,238 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
238,238 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: available for sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government obligations |
|
$ |
8,488 |
|
|
$ |
1,895 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
10,383 |
|
Agency obligations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,299 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,299 |
|
Corporate debt securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,063 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
92,063 |
|
Mortgage-backed securities (Residential) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,935 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
65,935 |
|
Other structured securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,832 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,832 |
|
Municipal securities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,587 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,488 |
|
|
$ |
258,611 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
267,099 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2009 |
|
|
|
Level I |
|
|
Level II |
|
|
Level III |
|
|
Total |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
439,423 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
439,423 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments: available for sale securities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Municipal securities |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
22,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,457 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivative interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,066 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
2,066 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(6) Medical Liabilities
The Companys medical liabilities at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Incurred but not reported liabilities |
|
$ |
121,629 |
|
|
$ |
121,782 |
|
Pharmacy liabilities |
|
|
32,015 |
|
|
|
45,648 |
|
Provider incentives and other medical payments |
|
|
26,129 |
|
|
|
31,683 |
|
Other medical liabilities |
|
|
3,690 |
|
|
|
3,195 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
183,463 |
|
|
$ |
202,308 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7) Medicare Part D
Total Part D related net assets (excluding medical claims payable) of $1.9 million at December
31, 2009 all relate to the 2009 CMS plan year. The Companys Part D related assets and liabilities
(excluding medical claims payable) at September 30, 2010 were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related to the |
|
|
Related to the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2009 plan year |
|
|
2010 plan year |
|
|
Total |
|
Current assets (liabilities): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds due for the benefit of members |
|
$ |
4,847 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
4,847 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk corridor payable to CMS |
|
$ |
(2,921 |
) |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
(2,921 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funds due for the benefit of members |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
21,499 |
|
|
$ |
21,499 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk corridor receivable from CMS |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
7,008 |
|
|
$ |
7,008 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances associated with Part D related assets and liabilities are expected to be settled in
the second half of the year following the year to which they relate. Current year Part D amounts
are routinely updated in subsequent periods as a result of retroactivity.
(8) Derivatives
In October 2008, the Company entered into two interest rate swap agreements in a total
notional amount of $100.0 million, relating to the floating interest rate component of the term
loan agreement under its previous credit facility (collectively, the 2007 Credit Agreement). In
February 2010, the Company terminated its interest rate swap agreements in connection with the
termination of the 2007 Credit Agreement. See Note 12 Debt. The interest rate swap agreements
were classified as cash flow hedges. See Note 5 Fair Value Measurements.
10
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
All derivatives were recognized on the balance sheet at their fair value. To the extent that
the cash flow hedges were effective, changes in their fair value were recorded in other
comprehensive income (loss) until earnings are affected by the variability of cash
flows of the hedged transaction (e.g. until periodic settlements of a variable asset or
liability are recorded in earnings). Any hedge ineffectiveness (which represents the amount by
which the changes in the fair value of the derivatives differ from changes in the fair value of the
hedged instrument) was recorded in current-period earnings. As a result of terminating the interest
rate swap agreements, the Company settled the swap obligations with the counterparties for
approximately $2.0 million and reclassified such amount from other comprehensive income to interest
expense during the first quarter of 2010.
The Company had no derivative financial instruments outstanding at September 30, 2010. A
summary of the aggregate notional amounts, balance sheet location and estimated fair values of
derivative financial instruments at December 31, 2009 was as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notional |
|
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value |
|
Hedging instruments |
|
Amount |
|
|
Balance Sheet Location |
|
Asset |
|
|
(Liability) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
100,000 |
|
|
Other noncurrent liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,066 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the effect of cash flow hedges on the Companys financial statements for the
periods presented is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effective Portion |
|
|
Ineffective Portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hedge Gain |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income Statement |
|
(Loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pretax Hedge |
|
|
Location of Gain |
|
Reclassified |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
|
(Loss) Reclassified |
|
from |
|
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
Recognized in |
|
|
from Accumulated |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
Statement |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
Other |
|
Other |
|
|
Location of |
|
Hedge Gain |
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Gain (Loss) |
|
(Loss) |
|
Type of Cash Flow Hedge |
|
Income |
|
|
Income |
|
Income |
|
|
Recognized |
|
Recognized |
|
|
For the three months ended September 30,
2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
|
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
None |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the three months ended September 30,
2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
137 |
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
None |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
$ |
(1,253 |
) |
|
None |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2009: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest rate swaps |
|
$ |
725 |
|
|
Interest Expense |
|
$ |
|
|
|
None |
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(9) Intangible Assets
A breakdown of the identifiable intangible assets and their assigned value and accumulated
amortization at September 30, 2010 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross Carrying |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
Net |
|
Trade name |
|
$ |
24,497 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
24,497 |
|
Noncompete agreements |
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
800 |
|
|
|
|
|
Provider network |
|
|
137,679 |
|
|
|
29,317 |
|
|
|
108,362 |
|
Medicare member network |
|
|
93,620 |
|
|
|
37,122 |
|
|
|
56,498 |
|
Management contract right |
|
|
1,555 |
|
|
|
544 |
|
|
|
1,011 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
258,151 |
|
|
$ |
67,783 |
|
|
$ |
190,368 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization expense on identifiable intangible assets for the three months ended September
30, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $4.5 million. Amortization expense on identifiable intangible
assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was approximately $13.4 million and
$13.8 million, respectively.
(10) Share-Based Compensation
In May 2010, the Companys stockholders approved an amendment and restatement of the 2006
Equity Incentive Plan. Among other items, the amendments increased the number of shares available
for issuance under the plan by 3,250,000 shares.
Stock Options
The Company granted options to purchase 550,712 shares of common stock pursuant to the 2006
Equity Incentive Plan during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Options to purchase 366,862
shares of common stock either were forfeited or expired during the nine months ended September 30,
2010. Options to purchase 3,997,120 shares of common stock were outstanding under this plan at
September 30, 2010. The outstanding options vest and become exercisable based on time, generally
over a four-year period, and expire ten years from their grant dates.
Restricted Stock
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company granted 420,945 shares of
restricted stock to employees pursuant to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, the restrictions of which
generally lapse over a four-year period. Additionally, 35,043 shares were purchased by certain
executives pursuant to the Management Stock Purchase Plan (the MSPP). The restrictions on shares
purchased under the MSPP generally lapse on the second anniversary of the grant date. Unvested
restricted stock at September 30, 2010 totaled 733,252 shares.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company awarded 40,683 shares of
restricted stock to certain of its directors pursuant to the 2006 Equity Incentive Plan, all of
which were outstanding at September 30, 2010. The restrictions relating to the restricted stock
awarded to non-employee directors in 2010 generally lapse one year from the grant date. In the
event a director resigns or is removed prior to the lapsing of the restriction, or if the director
fails to attend 75% of the board and applicable committee meetings during the one-year period,
shares will be forfeited unless resignation or failure to attend is caused by death or disability.
Stock Repurchase Program
In May 2010, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to buy
back up to $100.0 million of the Companys common stock through June 30, 2011. The program
authorizes purchases of common stock from time to time in either the open market or through private
transactions, in accordance with SEC and other applicable legal requirements. The timing, prices,
and sizes of purchases depends upon prevailing stock prices, general economic and market
conditions, and other considerations. Funds for the repurchase of shares have, and are expected
to, come primarily from unrestricted cash on hand and unrestricted cash generated from operations.
The repurchase program does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of common
stock and the repurchase program may be suspended at any time at the Companys discretion. As of
September 30, 2010, the Company had repurchased 837,634 shares of its common stock under the
program in open market transactions for approximately $14.3 million, or at an average cost of $17.10
per share, and had approximately $85.7 million in remaining repurchase authority under the program.
12
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(11) Net Income Per Common Share
The following table presents the calculation of the Companys net income per common share
basic and diluted (in thousands, except share data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Numerator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
53,780 |
|
|
$ |
42,314 |
|
|
$ |
143,356 |
|
|
$ |
94,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
basic |
|
|
56,482,679 |
|
|
|
54,518,162 |
|
|
|
56,872,071 |
|
|
|
54,502,081 |
|
Dilutive effect of stock options |
|
|
|
|
|
|
77,250 |
|
|
|
58,676 |
|
|
|
75,857 |
|
Dilutive effect of unvested restricted shares |
|
|
94,384 |
|
|
|
104,978 |
|
|
|
127,328 |
|
|
|
75,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
diluted |
|
|
56,577,063 |
|
|
|
54,700,390 |
|
|
|
57,058,075 |
|
|
|
54,653,367 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per common share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
$ |
0.78 |
|
|
$ |
2.52 |
|
|
$ |
1.74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.95 |
|
|
$ |
0.77 |
|
|
$ |
2.51 |
|
|
$ |
1.73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per share (EPS) reflects the potential dilution that could occur from
outstanding equity plan awards, including unexercised stock options and unvested restricted shares.
The dilutive effect is computed using the treasury stock method, which assumes all share-based
awards are exercised and the hypothetical proceeds from exercise are used by the Company to
purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. The incremental shares
(difference between shares assumed to be issued versus purchased), to the extent they would have
been dilutive, are included in the denominator of the diluted EPS calculation. Options with
respect to 4.2 million shares were antidilutive and therefore excluded from the computation of
diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009. Options with
respect to 4.1 million shares and 4.2 million shares were antidilutive and therefore excluded from
the computation of diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
(12) Debt
Long-term debt at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consisted of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Credit agreement |
|
$ |
166,250 |
|
|
$ |
236,973 |
|
Less: current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
(17,500 |
) |
|
|
(43,069 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt less current portion |
|
$ |
148,750 |
|
|
$ |
193,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On February 11, 2010, the Company entered into a $350.0 million credit agreement (the New
Credit Agreement), which, subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, provides for a
five-year $175.0 million term loan credit facility and a four-year $175.0 million revolving credit
facility (the New Credit Facilities). Proceeds from the New Credit Facilities, together with cash
on hand, were used to fund the repayment of $237.0 million in term loans outstanding under the 2007
Credit Agreement as well as transaction expenses related thereto.
Borrowings under the New Credit Agreement accrue interest on the basis of either a base rate
or a LIBOR rate plus, in each case, an applicable margin depending on the Companys debt-to-EBITDA
leverage ratio (275 basis points for LIBOR borrowings at September 30, 2010). The Company also pays
a commitment fee of 0.375% on the actual daily unused portions of the New Credit Facilities. The
revolving credit facility under the New Credit Agreement matures, the commitments thereunder
terminate, and all amounts then outstanding thereunder will be payable on February 11, 2014. As of
September 30, 2010, the revolving credit facility was undrawn.
13
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
The term loans under the New Credit Agreement are payable in equal quarterly principal
installments aggregating 10% of the aggregate initial principal amount of the term loans in the
first year, with the remaining outstanding principal balance of the term loans being payable in
equal quarterly installments aggregating 10%, 10%, 15%, and 55% in the second, third, fourth, and
fifth years, respectively. The net proceeds from certain asset sales, casualty/condemnation events,
and certain incurrences of indebtedness (subject, in the cases of asset sales and
casualty/condemnation events, to certain reinvestment rights), and a portion of the net proceeds
from equity issuances and, under certain circumstances, the Companys excess cash flow, are
required to be used to make prepayments in respect of loans outstanding under the New Credit
Facilities. The term loans made under the New Credit Agreement mature, and all amounts then
outstanding thereunder will be payable on February 11, 2015.
In connection with entering into the New Credit Agreement, the Company wrote-off unamortized
deferred financing costs of approximately $5.1 million incurred in connection with the 2007 Credit
Agreement. The Company also terminated its outstanding interest rate swap agreements, which
resulted in a payment of approximately $2.0 million to the swap counterparties. Such amounts are
reflected as interest expense in the financial results of the Company for the nine months ending
September 30, 2010.
In connection with the acquisition of Bravo (which is expected to close in the fourth quarter
of 2010), the Company has agreed with its existing lenders and certain additional lenders to amend
the New Credit Agreement to provide for, among other things, the acquisition financing.
As amended, the facility will provide for the following:
|
|
|
$355.0 million in term loan A indebtedness maturing in February 2015 comprised of: |
|
|
|
$175.0 million of term loan A indebtedness ($166.3 million of which is currently outstanding); |
|
|
|
|
$180.0 million of new term loan A indebtedness to be funded at the closing of the acquisition; |
|
|
|
$175.0 million revolving credit facility (currently undrawn and maturing in February 2014); and |
|
|
|
$200.0 million of new six-year term loan B indebtedness to be funded at the closing of the acquisition. |
Maturities of principal amounts under the new term A borrowings will mirror the maturities of
the existing term loan A borrowings. The Company currently expects that outstanding loans under the
new credit facility will bear interest at a spread over LIBOR (initially 375 basis points for term
loan A indebtedness and 450 basis points for term loan B indebtedness), and will step down
depending on the Companys total leverage ratio. With respect to the term loan B indebtedness, the
terms of the facility include a contractual minimum LIBOR of 1.5%.
See Agreement to Acquire
Bravo Health included above in Note 1 for additional information related thereto.
As of September 30, 2010, the Company had incurred $8.8 million in debt issue costs associated
with the amended credit facility. Such amounts are included in other non-current assets on the
Companys balance sheet at September 30, 2010.
(13) Comprehensive Income
The following table presents details supporting the determination of comprehensive income for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
53,780 |
|
|
$ |
42,314 |
|
|
$ |
143,356 |
|
|
$ |
94,816 |
|
Net unrealized gain on available for sale
investment securities, net of tax |
|
|
2,144 |
|
|
|
51 |
|
|
|
4,136 |
|
|
|
189 |
|
Net gain on interest rate swaps, net of tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
|
|
478 |
|
Reclass of accumulated other comprehensive
income on interest rate swap termination
(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,253 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income, net of tax |
|
$ |
55,924 |
|
|
$ |
42,449 |
|
|
$ |
148,768 |
|
|
$ |
95,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income balances related to interest rate swap derivatives
that were reclassified to interest expense and recognized in the three months ended March 31,
2010. See Note 8, Derivatives. |
14
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
(14) Segment Information
The Company reports its business in three segments: Medicare Advantage, stand-alone PDP, and
Corporate. Medicare Advantage (MA-PD) consists of Medicare-eligible beneficiaries receiving
healthcare benefits, including prescription drugs, through a coordinated care plan qualifying under
Part C and Part D of the Medicare Program. Stand-alone PDP (PDP) consists of Medicare-eligible
beneficiaries receiving prescription drug benefits on a stand-alone basis in accordance with
Medicare Part D. The Corporate segment consists primarily of corporate expenses not allocated to
the other reportable segments. These segment groupings are also consistent with information used by
the Companys chief executive officer in making operating decisions.
The accounting policies of each segment are the same and are described in Note 1 to the 2009
Form 10-K. The results of each segment are measured and evaluated by earnings before interest
expense, depreciation and amortization expense, and income taxes (EBITDA). The Company does not
allocate certain corporate overhead amounts (classified as selling, general and administrative
expenses, or SG&A) or interest expense to the segments. The Company evaluates interest expense,
income taxes, and asset and liability details on a consolidated basis as these items are managed in
a corporate shared service environment and are not the responsibility of segment operating
management.
Revenue includes premium revenue, management and other fee income, and investment income.
Asset and equity details by reportable segment have not been disclosed, as the Company does
not internally report such information.
Financial data by reportable segment for the three and nine months ended September 30 is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MA-PD |
|
|
PDP |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
Three months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
631,758 |
|
|
$ |
93,452 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
725,222 |
|
EBITDA |
|
|
91,593 |
|
|
|
11,938 |
|
|
|
(7,796 |
) |
|
|
95,735 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
6,166 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
7,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
590,720 |
|
|
$ |
69,044 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
659,780 |
|
EBITDA |
|
|
75,721 |
|
|
|
8,039 |
|
|
|
(9,309 |
) |
|
|
74,451 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
6,330 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1,432 |
|
|
|
7,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,915,782 |
|
|
$ |
338,323 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
2,254,143 |
|
EBITDA |
|
|
273,415 |
|
|
|
11,337 |
|
|
|
(20,294 |
) |
|
|
264,458 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
18,596 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
4,169 |
|
|
|
22,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,739,239 |
|
|
$ |
249,158 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
1,988,439 |
|
EBITDA |
|
|
191,961 |
|
|
|
10,295 |
|
|
|
(21,706 |
) |
|
|
180,550 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
19,052 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
3,836 |
|
|
|
22,948 |
|
15
HEALTHSPRING, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(unaudited)
As of January 1, 2010, the Company revised its methodology for allocating SG&A expenses within
its prescription drug operations to its MA-PD and PDP segments, which resulted in allocating a
greater share of such expenses to its PDP segment. As a result of these
revisions, the segment EBITDA amounts for the 2009 period include reclassification adjustments
between segments such that the periods presented are comparable.
The Company uses segment EBITDA as an analytical indicator for purposes of assessing segment
performance, as is common in the healthcare industry. Segment EBITDA should not be considered as a
measure of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles and segment EBITDA,
as presented, may not be comparable to other companies.
A reconciliation of reportable segment EBITDA to net income included in the consolidated
statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
95,735 |
|
|
$ |
74,451 |
|
|
$ |
264,458 |
|
|
$ |
180,550 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(31,292 |
) |
|
|
(20,593 |
) |
|
|
(82,917 |
) |
|
|
(50,772 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(3,150 |
) |
|
|
(3,762 |
) |
|
|
(15,375 |
) |
|
|
(12,014 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(7,513 |
) |
|
|
(7,782 |
) |
|
|
(22,810 |
) |
|
|
(22,948 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
53,780 |
|
|
$ |
42,314 |
|
|
$ |
143,356 |
|
|
$ |
94,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16
Item 2: Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
You should read the following discussion and analysis in conjunction with our condensed
consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report and our
audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto for the year ended December 31,
2009, appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K that was filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC) on February 11, 2010 (the 2009 Form 10-K). Statements contained in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that are not historical fact are forward-looking statements that the
company intends to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements
contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Statements that are predictive
in nature, that depend on or refer to future events or conditions, or that include words such as
anticipates, believes, could, estimates, expects, intends, may, plans, potential,
predicts, projects, should, will, would, and similar expressions are forward-looking
statements.
The company cautions that forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks,
uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance, or achievements to
be materially different from any future results, performance, or achievements expressed or implied
by the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements reflect our current views with
respect to future events and are based on assumptions and subject to risks and uncertainties. Given
these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
In evaluating any forward-looking statement, you should specifically consider the information
set forth under the captions Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements and Item 1A. Risk
Factors in the 2009 Form 10-K and the information set forth under Cautionary Statement Regarding
Forward-Looking Statements in our earnings and other press releases, as well as other cautionary
statements contained elsewhere in this report, including the matters discussed in Part II, Item
1A. Risk Factors below and Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates. We undertake no
obligation beyond that required by law to update publicly any forward-looking statements for any
reason, even if new information becomes available or other events occur in the future. You should
read this report and the documents that we reference in this report and have filed as exhibits to
this report completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially
different from what we expect.
Overview
General
HealthSpring, Inc. (the company or HealthSpring) is one of the countrys largest
coordinated care plans whose primary focus is Medicare, the federal government-sponsored health
insurance program for U.S. citizens aged 65 and older, qualifying disabled persons, and persons
suffering from end-stage renal disease. We operate Medicare Advantage plans in Alabama, Florida,
Georgia, Illinois, Mississippi, Tennessee, and Texas and offer Medicare Part D prescription drug
plans on a national basis. The company also provides management services to physician practices. We
sometimes refer to our Medicare Advantage plans, including plans providing prescription drug
benefits, or MA-PD, collectively as Medicare Advantage plans and our stand-alone prescription
drug plan as our PDP. For purposes of additional analysis, the company provides membership and
certain financial information, including premium revenue and medical expense, for our Medicare
Advantage (including MA-PD) and PDP plans.
Medicare premiums, including premiums paid to our PDP, account for substantially all of our
revenue. As a consequence, our profitability is dependent on government funding levels for
Medicare programs. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is the federal agency
responsible for overseeing the Medicare program. The companys Tennessee Medicare Advantage plan
was selected by CMS for a RADV Audit of the 2006 risk adjustment data used to determine 2007
premium rates (sometimes referred to as RADV Audits). In February 2010, the company responded to
the RADV Audit information request, including retrieving and providing medical records that support
diagnosis codes and risk scores relating to 2006 dates of service and 2007 plan premiums. The
company is currently unable to predict the outcome of the RADV Audit, or to predict the amount of
premiums, if any, that may be subject to repayment by the Tennessee plan to CMS.
Recent health insurance reform, as embodied in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,
as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act (collectively, PPACA) signed by
the President into law in March 2010, is projected to result in a significant reduction in federal
spending on the Medicare Advantage program. In addition to Medicare Advantage funding cuts, PPACA
reduces enrollment periods, establishes medical loss ratio, or MLR, minimum levels, ties certain
rate and rebate benefits to quality ratings, and imposes federal premium taxes. These changes may
have a significant adverse impact on our business, including member growth prospects and financial
results. Most of the provisions of PPACA that are material to our business phase in over a number
of years and regulations defining and implementing key provisions of PPACA applicable to us are not
yet developed.
Consequently, we are currently unable to predict with any reasonable certainty or otherwise
quantify the likely impact of PPACA on our business model, financial condition, or results of
operations.
17
We report our business in three segments: Medicare Advantage; PDP; and Corporate. The
following discussion of our results of operations includes a discussion of revenue and certain
expenses by reportable segment. See Segment Information below for additional information
related thereto.
Agreement to Acquire Bravo Health
On August 26, 2010, the company entered into a definitive agreement to acquire all of the
outstanding capital stock of Bravo Health, Inc. (Bravo), an operator of Medicare Advantage
coordinated care plans in Pennsylvania, the Mid-Atlantic region, and Texas, and Medicare Part D
stand-alone prescription drug plans in 43 states.
The
company will acquire Bravo, a privately held company, for
approximately $545.0 million in cash,
subject to adjustment. The company has agreed with its existing lenders and certain additional
lenders to amend its existing credit facility to provide for, among other things, the acquisition financing. As amended, the facility will provide for the following:
|
|
|
$355.0 million in term loan A indebtedness maturing in February 2015 comprised of:
|
|
|
|
$175.0 million of term loan A indebtedness
($166.3 million of which is currently outstanding);
|
|
|
|
$180.0 million of new term loan A indebtedness to be
funded at the closing of the acquisition; |
|
|
|
$175.0 million revolving credit facility (currently
undrawn and maturing in February 2014); and |
|
|
|
$200.0 million of new six-year term loan B indebtedness
to be funded at the closing of the acquisition. |
The additional term loan indebtedness, availability under the existing $175.0 million
revolving credit facility, and cash on hand will be sufficient to fund the acquisition of Bravo.
See Indebtedness.
The remaining material conditions to the closing of the Bravo acquisition primarily relate to
approvals by various state regulatory authorities.
Other than financing commitments accounted for as interest expenses, Bravo-related transaction
expenses were insignificant for the 2010 third quarter. Assuming the transaction closes in 2010,
the company expects to incur approximately $8.5 million, or $0.11 per share, of transaction
expenses in 2010. As of September 30, 2010, Bravo had Medicare Advantage membership of 103,044 and
stand-alone PDP membership of 293,920. Based upon recent data released by CMS, Bravo estimates it
will have approximately 390,000-400,000 PDP members as of January 1, 2011.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts
In September 2010, the Emerging Issues Task Force issued EITF Issue 09-G, Accounting for
Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts (EITF Issue 09-G), which
modifies the types of costs incurred by insurance entities that can be capitalized in the
acquisition of new and renewal insurance contracts. The Task Force reached a final consensus that
requires costs to be incremental or directly related to the successful acquisition of new or
renewal contracts to be capitalized as a deferred acquisition cost. EITF Issue 09-G is effective
for the company beginning with its interim period ended March 31, 2012 with either prospective or
retrospective application permitted. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the
impact that EITF Issue 09-G will have on our consolidated financial statements.
18
Results of Operations
The consolidated results of operations include the accounts of HealthSpring and its
subsidiaries. The following table sets forth the consolidated statements of income data expressed
in dollars (in thousands) and as a percentage of total revenue for each period indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium revenue |
|
$ |
712,658 |
|
|
|
98.3 |
% |
|
$ |
649,795 |
|
|
|
98.5 |
% |
Management and other fees |
|
|
10,413 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
9,108 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
Investment income |
|
|
2,151 |
|
|
|
0.3 |
|
|
|
877 |
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
725,222 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
659,780 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical expense |
|
|
561,823 |
|
|
|
77.5 |
|
|
|
519,478 |
|
|
|
78.7 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
67,664 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
65,851 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
7,513 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
7,782 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
3,150 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
3,762 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
640,150 |
|
|
|
88.3 |
|
|
|
596,873 |
|
|
|
90.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
85,072 |
|
|
|
11.7 |
|
|
|
62,907 |
|
|
|
9.5 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(31,292 |
) |
|
|
(4.3 |
) |
|
|
(20,593 |
) |
|
|
(3.1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
53,780 |
|
|
|
7.4 |
% |
|
$ |
42,314 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Revenue: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Premium revenue |
|
$ |
2,218,378 |
|
|
|
98.4 |
% |
|
$ |
1,955,842 |
|
|
|
98.3 |
% |
Management and other fees |
|
|
31,191 |
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
|
29,065 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
Investment income |
|
|
4,574 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
3,532 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenue |
|
|
2,254,143 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
1,988,439 |
|
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medical expense |
|
|
1,779,275 |
|
|
|
78.9 |
|
|
|
1,607,481 |
|
|
|
80.8 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
210,410 |
|
|
|
9.3 |
|
|
|
200,408 |
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
22,810 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
22,948 |
|
|
|
1.2 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
15,375 |
|
|
|
0.8 |
|
|
|
12,014 |
|
|
|
0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses |
|
|
2,027,870 |
|
|
|
90.0 |
|
|
|
1,842,851 |
|
|
|
92.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
226,273 |
|
|
|
10.0 |
|
|
|
145,588 |
|
|
|
7.3 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(82,917 |
) |
|
|
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
(50,772 |
) |
|
|
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
143,356 |
|
|
|
6.4 |
% |
|
$ |
94,816 |
|
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
19
Membership
Our primary source of revenue is monthly premium payments we receive based on membership
enrolled in Medicare. The following table summarizes our membership as of the dates specified:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Medicare Advantage Membership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alabama |
|
|
30,397 |
|
|
|
31,330 |
|
|
|
31,007 |
|
Florida |
|
|
36,472 |
|
|
|
32,606 |
|
|
|
31,513 |
|
Georgia |
|
|
769 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Illinois |
|
|
11,730 |
|
|
|
11,261 |
|
|
|
11,077 |
|
Mississippi |
|
|
5,328 |
|
|
|
4,591 |
|
|
|
4,473 |
|
Tennessee |
|
|
65,334 |
|
|
|
58,252 |
|
|
|
57,240 |
|
Texas |
|
|
48,025 |
|
|
|
51,201 |
|
|
|
51,325 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
198,055 |
|
|
|
189,241 |
|
|
|
186,635 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare PDP Membership |
|
|
409,239 |
|
|
|
313,045 |
|
|
|
303,975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Medicare Advantage. Our Medicare Advantage membership increased by 6.1% to 198,055 members at
September 30, 2010, as compared to 186,635 members at September 30, 2009, with membership gains in
all our health plans except our Alabama and Texas plans. Our Medicare Advantage net membership
gain of 11,420 members since September 30, 2009 reflects both focused sales and marketing efforts
through the annual open enrollment and election periods and better retention rates resulting from,
we believe, the relative attractiveness of our various plans benefits. Effective as of January 1,
2010, we began operating Medicare Advantage plans in three counties in Northern Georgia.
PDP. PDP membership increased by 34.6% to 409,239 members at September 30, 2010 as compared
to 303,975 at September 30, 2009, primarily as a result of the auto-assignment of members at the
beginning of the year. We do not actively market our PDP and have relied on CMS auto-assignments
of dual-eligible beneficiaries for membership. We have continued to receive assignments or
otherwise enroll dual-eligible beneficiaries in our PDP plans during lock-in and expect incremental
growth for the balance of the year.
According to CMS, we are below the relevant benchmarks and will retain existing membership and
be qualified for auto-assignment of new members in 18 of the 34 CMS PDP regions for 2011. In
addition, under CMSs new de minimus rules, we will retain existing membership in 8 of the regions.
Based upon recent data released by CMS, the company now estimates it will have approximately
425,000-435,000 members in these 26 regions as of January 1, 2011 (excluding any members acquired
in the Bravo acquisition).
Comparison of the Three-Month Period Ended September 30, 2010 to the Three-Month Period Ended
September 30, 2009
Revenue
Total revenue was $725.2 million in the three-month period ended September 30, 2010 as
compared with $659.8 million for the same period in 2009, representing an increase of $65.4
million, or 9.9%. The components of revenue were as follows:
Premium Revenue: Total premium revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was
$712.7 million as compared with $649.8 million in the same period in 2009, representing an increase
of $62.9 million, or 9.7%. The components of premium revenue and the primary reasons for changes
were as follows:
Medicare Advantage: Medicare Advantage (including MA-PD) premiums were $618.9 million for
the three months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to $580.0 million in the third quarter
of 2009, representing an increase of $38.9 million, or 6.7%. The increase in Medicare
Advantage premiums in 2010 is primarily attributable to increases in membership. Per member
per month (PMPM) premiums for the 2010 third quarter averaged $1,042, and were level
compared to the 2009 third quarter, as expected. PMPM premiums in the current quarter
reflect increases in the PMPM premium for the drug component of our plans and increases
related to member risk scores, offset by decreases in CMS-calculated base rates.
20
PDP: PDP premiums (after risk corridor adjustments) were $93.4 million in the three months
ended September 30, 2010 compared to $69.0 million in the same period of 2009, an increase of
$24.4 million, or 35.4%. The increase in premiums for the 2010 third quarter is primarily
the result of increases in membership. Our average PMPM premiums (after risk corridor
adjustments) were $77 in the 2010 third quarter, compared with $76 in the 2009 third quarter.
Investment Income: Investment income in the 2010 third quarter increased $1.3 million
compared with the 2009 third quarter as a result of increases in invested balances, as the company
has moved substantial amounts out of cash and cash equivalents into investments since the 2009
third quarter, and in the average duration and yield on invested assets in the portfolio.
Medical Expense
Medicare Advantage. Medicare Advantage (including MA-PD) medical expense for the three months
ended September 30, 2010 increased $23.9 million, or 5.2%, to $486.1 million from $462.2 million
for the comparable period of 2009, which is primarily attributable to membership increases in the
2010 period as compared to the 2009 period. For the three months ended September 30, 2010, the
Medicare Advantage MLR was 78.5% versus 79.7% for the same period of 2009. Changes in benefit
design and decreases in inpatient utilization contributed to the decrease in the current period
MLR. Moreover, improved results for the drug component of our Medicare Advantage plans contributed
to the improved MLR. This improvement in the drug component of our Medicare Advantage MLR was
attributable to both higher PMPM premiums and to lower drug expenses as a result of increased
pharmacy rebates. Our Medicare Advantage medical expense calculated on a PMPM basis was $818 for
the three months ended September 30, 2010, compared with $831 for the comparable 2009 quarter.
PDP. PDP medical expense for the three months ended September 30, 2010 increased $19.1
million to $75.4 million, compared to $56.3 million in the same period last year. PDP MLR for the
2010 third quarter was 80.7%, compared to 81.5% in the 2009 third quarter. The improvement in MLR
for the 2010 third quarter was primarily the result of increased levels of rebates from drug
manufacturers compared to the 2009 third quarter.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expense
Selling, general, and administrative, or SG&A, expense for the three months ended September
30, 2010 was $67.7 million as compared with $65.9 million for the same prior year period, an
increase of $1.8 million, or 2.8%. The increase in the 2010 third quarter as compared to the prior
year period is primarily the result of increases in printing and advertising. As a percentage of
revenue, SG&A expense decreased approximately 70 basis points for the three months ended September
30, 2010 compared to the prior year period. As a result of the shortened 2011 enrollment period,
which will no longer permit enrollment elections after the calendar year end, the company will
accelerate marketing expenses typically spread over the fourth quarter of the current year and
first quarter of the subsequent year into the fourth quarter of 2010.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $3.1 million in the 2010 third quarter, compared with $3.8 million in the
2009 third quarter. The decrease in the current quarter was the result of lower average debt
amounts outstanding and lower interest rates compared to the 2009 third quarter. Interest expense
in the 2010 third quarter includes approximately $1.0 million of fees associated with amending the
existing credit facility (see Indebtedness below). The weighted average interest rate incurred
on our borrowings during the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 was 7.2% and 5.9%,
respectively (3.2% and 4.7%, respectively, exclusive of amortization of deferred financing costs
and credit facility fees).
Income Tax Expense
For the three months ended September 30, 2010, income tax expense was $31.3 million,
reflecting an effective tax rate of 36.8%, as compared to $20.6 million, reflecting an effective
tax rate of 32.7%, for the same period of 2009. The difference in tax rates was principally driven
from the tax impact related to business combination accounting during both periods. The Company
expects the effective tax rate for the full 2010 year will approximate 36.5% (exclusive of any
impact associated with the Bravo acquisition).
21
Comparison of the Nine-Month Period Ended September 30, 2010 to the Nine-Month Period Ended
September 30, 2009
Revenue
Total revenue was $2.3 billion in the nine-month period ended September 30, 2010 as compared
with $2.0 billion for the same period in 2009, representing an increase of $265.7 million, or
13.4%. The components of revenue were as follows:
Premium Revenue: Total premium revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $2.2
billion as compared with $2.0 billion in the same period in 2009, representing an increase of
$262.5 million, or 13.4%. The components of premium revenue and the primary reasons for changes
were as follows:
Medicare Advantage: Medicare Advantage (including MA-PD) premiums increased $174.4 million,
or 10.2%, to $1.9 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 as compared to the
same period of 2009. The increase in Medicare Advantage premiums in 2010 is primarily
attributable to increases in membership. PMPM premiums for the current nine month period
averaged $1,062, which reflects an increase of 0.7% as compared to the 2009 comparable
period. The PMPM premium increase in the current period is primarily the result of increases
in the drug component portion of the premium and increases related to member risk scores,
which were partially offset by decreases in CMS-calculated base rates.
PDP: PDP premiums (after risk corridor adjustments) were $338.3 million in the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 compared to $248.9 million in the same period of 2009, an increase
of $89.4 million, or 35.9%. The increase in premiums for the current nine month period is
primarily the result of increases in membership. Our average PMPM premiums (after risk
corridor adjustments) were $95 in the current nine month period, which is flat compared to
the 2009 comparable period.
Medical Expense
Medicare Advantage. Medicare Advantage (including MA-PD) medical expense for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010 increased $89.5 million, or 6.5%, to $1.5 billion from $1.4 billion for
the comparable period of 2009, which is primarily attributable to membership increases in the 2010
period as compared to the 2009 period. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Medicare
Advantage MLR was 78.2% versus 81.0% for the same period of 2009. The MLR improvement in the
current period is primarily attributable to changes in benefit design and lower inpatient
utilization, combined with premium revenue increases. Our Medicare Advantage medical expense
calculated on a PMPM basis was $831 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared with
$854 for the comparable 2009 period.
PDP. PDP medical expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 increased $83.7 million
to $308.2 million, compared to $224.5 million in the same period last year. PDP MLR for the 2010
nine month period was 91.1%, compared to 90.2% in the same period in 2009. The increase in PDP MLR
for the current period was primarily attributable to changes in benefit design and increased
transition prescription drug costs offset by favorable levels of pharmacy rebates in the 2010
period.
Selling, General, and Administrative Expense
SG&A expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $210.4 million as compared with
$200.4 million for the same prior year period, an increase of $10.0 million, or 5.0%. The increase
in the 2010 period as compared to the prior year period is primarily the result of additional
personnel, increases in sales commissions attributable to membership growth, and increases in
printing. As a percentage of revenue, SG&A expense decreased approximately 80 basis points for the
nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to the prior year period.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $15.4 million in the 2010 nine month period, compared with $12.0 million
in the 2009 same period. The companys interest expense in the 2010 period includes debt
extinguishment costs of $7.1 million resulting from the companys entering into a new credit
facility and terminating its prior credit facility during the first quarter. Net of extinguishment
costs, interest expense decreased $3.7 million in the 2010 period, reflecting lower average debt
amounts outstanding and lower interest rates compared to the 2009 period. The weighted average
interest rate incurred on our borrowings during the nine month periods ended September 30, 2010 and
2009 was 5.9% and 6.1%, respectively (3.5% and 4.9%, respectively, exclusive of amortization of
deferred financing costs and credit facility fees).
22
Income Tax Expense
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, income tax expense was $82.9 million, reflecting
an effective tax rate of 36.6%, as compared to $50.8 million, reflecting an effective tax rate of
34.9%, for the same period of 2009. The difference in tax rates was principally driven by business
combination accounting, as well as the reversal of tax benefits on cancelled stock compensation
awards and state tax credits.
Segment Information
We report our business in three segments: Medicare Advantage, stand-alone PDP, and Corporate.
Medicare Advantage (MA-PD) consists of Medicare-eligible beneficiaries receiving healthcare
benefits, including prescription drugs, through a coordinated care plan qualifying under Part C and
Part D of the Medicare Program. Stand-alone PDP consists of Medicare-eligible beneficiaries
receiving prescription drug benefits on a stand-alone basis in accordance with Medicare Part D. The
Corporate segment consists primarily of corporate expenses not allocated to the other reportable
segments. These segment groupings are also consistent with information used by our chief executive
officer in making operating decisions.
The results of each segment are measured and evaluated by earnings before interest expense,
depreciation and amortization expense, and income taxes (EBITDA). We do not allocate certain
corporate overhead amounts (classified as SG&A expense) or interest expense to our segments. We
evaluate interest expense, income taxes, and asset and liability details on a consolidated basis as
these items are managed in a corporate shared service environment and are not the responsibility of
segment operating management.
Revenue includes premium revenue, management and other fee income, and investment income.
Asset and equity details by reportable segment have not been disclosed, as the company does
not internally report such information.
Financial data by reportable segment for the three and nine months ended September 30 is as
follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MA-PD |
|
|
PDP |
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
Total |
|
Three months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
631,758 |
|
|
$ |
93,452 |
|
|
$ |
12 |
|
|
$ |
725,222 |
|
EBITDA |
|
|
91,593 |
|
|
|
11,938 |
|
|
|
(7,796 |
) |
|
|
95,735 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
6,166 |
|
|
|
14 |
|
|
|
1,333 |
|
|
|
7,513 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
590,720 |
|
|
$ |
69,044 |
|
|
$ |
16 |
|
|
$ |
659,780 |
|
EBITDA |
|
|
75,721 |
|
|
|
8,039 |
|
|
|
(9,309 |
) |
|
|
74,451 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
6,330 |
|
|
|
20 |
|
|
|
1,432 |
|
|
|
7,782 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2010 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,915,782 |
|
|
$ |
338,323 |
|
|
$ |
38 |
|
|
$ |
2,254,143 |
|
EBITDA |
|
|
273,415 |
|
|
|
11,337 |
|
|
|
(20,294 |
) |
|
|
264,458 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
18,596 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
|
|
4,169 |
|
|
|
22,810 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue |
|
$ |
1,739,239 |
|
|
$ |
249,158 |
|
|
$ |
42 |
|
|
$ |
1,988,439 |
|
EBITDA |
|
|
191,961 |
|
|
|
10,295 |
|
|
|
(21,706 |
) |
|
|
180,550 |
|
Depreciation and amortization expense |
|
|
19,052 |
|
|
|
60 |
|
|
|
3,836 |
|
|
|
22,948 |
|
As of January 1, 2010, the company revised its methodology for allocating selling, general,
and administrative expenses within its prescription drug operations to its MA-PD and PDP segments,
which resulted in allocating a greater share of such expenses to its PDP segment. As a result of
these revisions, the segment EBITDA amounts for the 2009 period includes reclassification
adjustments between segments such that the periods presented are comparable.
23
We use segment EBITDA as an analytical indicator for purposes of assessing segment
performance, as is common in the healthcare industry. Segment EBITDA should not be considered as a
measure of financial performance under generally accepted accounting principles and segment EBITDA,
as presented, may not be comparable to other companies.
A reconciliation of reportable segment EBITDA to net income included in the consolidated
statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30 is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
EBITDA |
|
$ |
95,735 |
|
|
$ |
74,451 |
|
|
$ |
264,458 |
|
|
$ |
180,550 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
(31,292 |
) |
|
|
(20,593 |
) |
|
|
(82,917 |
) |
|
|
(50,772 |
) |
Interest expense |
|
|
(3,150 |
) |
|
|
(3,762 |
) |
|
|
(15,375 |
) |
|
|
(12,014 |
) |
Depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(7,513 |
) |
|
|
(7,782 |
) |
|
|
(22,810 |
) |
|
|
(22,948 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income |
|
$ |
53,780 |
|
|
$ |
42,314 |
|
|
$ |
143,356 |
|
|
$ |
94,816 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We finance our operations primarily through internally generated funds. We generate cash
primarily from premium revenue and our primary uses of cash are payment of medical and SG&A
expenses and principal and interest on indebtedness. We anticipate that our current level of cash
on hand, internally generated cash flows, and borrowings available under our revolving credit
facility will be sufficient to fund our working capital needs, our debt service, and anticipated
capital expenditures over at least the next twelve months.
The reported changes in cash and cash equivalents for the nine month period ended September
30, 2010, compared to the same period of 2009, were as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
$ |
155,768 |
|
|
$ |
116,209 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(243,269 |
) |
|
|
(20,956 |
) |
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
|
(113,684 |
) |
|
|
12,273 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(201,185 |
) |
|
$ |
107,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flows provided by our operations and available cash
on hand, although the companys access to and use of internally generated cash flows may be limited
by regulatory requirements which stipulate that the companys regulated insurance subsidiaries
maintain minimum levels of capital. See Statutory Capital Requirements. To date, we have not
had to borrow under our $175.0 million revolving credit facility to fund operating activities. See
Indebtedness for a discussion of borrowings under the revolving credit facility in connection
with the Bravo acquisition. We generated cash from operating activities of $155.8 million during
the nine months ended September 30, 2010, compared to generating cash of $116.2 million during the
nine months ended September 30, 2009. Cash flows from operations for the 2010 period was favorably
impacted by increased earnings driven primarily by favorable trends in
Medicare Advantage medical expenses in the current period compared to the 2009
period and by the receipt of $50.2 million of prior year final CMS settlements compared to similar
amounts received in the 2009 period of $31.8 million.
Cash Flows from Investing and Financing Activities
For the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the primary investing activities consisted of
expenditures of $384.3 million to purchase investment securities and restricted investments, the
receipt of $150.5 million in proceeds from the sale or maturity of investment securities and
restricted investments, and $9.1 million spent on property and equipment additions. The investing
activity in the prior year period consisted primarily of $55.8 million to purchase investment
securities, the receipt of $46.8 million in proceeds from the maturity of investment securities,
and $11.5 million in property and equipment additions.
24
During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the companys financing activities consisted
primarily of the receipt of $200.0 million in proceeds from the issuance of debt, the expenditure
of $270.7 million for the repayment of existing long-term debt, and $22.3 million of funds
withdrawn in excess of funds received from CMS for the benefit of members. The financing activity
in the prior year period consisted primarily of $36.1 million of funds received in excess of funds
withdrawn from CMS for the benefit of members, and $23.9 million for the repayment of long-term
debt. Funds due for the benefit of members from CMS are recorded on our balance sheet at September
30, 2010 and at December 31, 2009. We settled approximately $1.9 million of such Part D related
amounts (including risk corridor settlements) relating to 2009 with CMS during the fourth quarter
of 2010 as part of the final settlement of Part D payments for the 2009 plan year.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
At September 30, 2010, the companys cash and cash equivalents were $238.2 million, $158.4
million of which was held in unregulated subsidiaries. Substantially all of the companys liquidity
is in the form of cash and cash equivalents, a portion of which ($79.8 million at September 30,
2010) is held by the companys regulated insurance subsidiaries, which amounts are required by law
and by our credit agreement to be invested in low-risk, short-term, highly-liquid investments (such
as government securities, money market funds, deposit accounts, and overnight repurchase
agreements). The company also invests in securities ($329.3 million at September 30, 2010),
primarily corporate, asset-backed and government debt securities, that it generally intends, and
has the ability, to hold to maturity. Because the company is not relying on these investment
securities for near-term liquidity, short term fluctuations in market pricing generally do not
affect the companys ability to meet its liquidity needs. To date, the company has not experienced
any material issuer defaults on its investment securities.
Statutory Capital Requirements
The companys regulated insurance subsidiaries are required to maintain satisfactory minimum
net worth requirements established by their respective state departments of insurance. At September
30, 2010, the statutory minimum net worth requirements and actual statutory net worth were $18.5
million and $83.0 million for the Tennessee HMO; $1.1 million and $54.8 million for the Alabama
HMO; $10.8 million and $38.3 million for the Florida HMO; $38.4 million (at 200% of authorized
control level) and $64.1 million for the Texas HMO; and $14.6 million (at 200% of authorized
control level) and $42.7 million for the accident and health subsidiary, respectively. Each of
these subsidiaries was in compliance with applicable statutory requirements as of September 30,
2010. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the state departments of insurance can require our regulated
insurance subsidiaries to maintain minimum levels of statutory capital in excess of amounts
required under the applicable state law if they determine that maintaining additional statutory
capital is in the best interest of the companys members.
The regulated insurance subsidiaries are restricted from making distributions without
appropriate regulatory notifications and approvals or to the extent such dividends would put them
out of compliance with statutory net worth requirements. During the three months ended September
30, 2010, our insurance subsidiaries distributed $68.0 million in cash to the parent company.
Indebtedness
Long-term debt at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 consists of the following (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2008 |
|
Senior secured term loan |
|
$ |
166,250 |
|
|
$ |
236,973 |
|
Less: current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
(17,500 |
) |
|
|
(43,069 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt less current portion |
|
$ |
148,750 |
|
|
$ |
193,904 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On February 11, 2010, the company entered into a $350.0 million credit agreement (the New
Credit Agreement), which, subject to the terms and conditions set forth therein, provides for a
five-year, $175.0 million term loan credit facility and a four-year, $175.0 million revolving
credit facility (the New Credit Facilities). Proceeds from the New Credit Facilities, together
with cash on hand, were used to fund the repayment of $237.0 million in term loans outstanding
under the companys 2007 credit agreement as well as transaction expenses related thereto.
Borrowings under the New Credit Agreement accrue interest on the basis of either a base rate
or a LIBOR rate plus, in each case, an applicable margin depending on the companys debt-to-EBITDA
leverage ratio (275 basis points for LIBOR borrowings at September 30, 2010). The company also pays
a commitment fee of 0.375% on the actual daily unused portions of the New Credit
Facilities. The revolving credit facility under the New Credit Agreement matures, the commitments
thereunder terminate, and all amounts then outstanding thereunder will be payable on February 11,
2014. As of the date of this report the revolving credit agreement was undrawn.
25
In connection with entering into the New Credit Agreement, the company wrote-off unamortized
deferred financing costs of approximately $5.1 million incurred in connection with the 2007 credit
agreement. The company also terminated both interest rate swap agreements, which resulted in a
payment of approximately $2.0 million to the swap counterparties. Such amounts are classified as
interest expense and are reflected in the financial results of the company for the nine months
ended September 30, 2010.
In connection with the acquisition of Bravo (which is expected to close in the fourth quarter
of 2010), the company has agreed with its existing lenders and certain additional lenders to amend
the New Credit Agreement to provide for, among other things, the acquisition financing.
As amended, the facility will provide for the following:
|
|
|
$355.0 million in term loan A indebtedness maturing in February 2015 comprised of:
|
|
|
|
$175.0 million of term loan A indebtedness ($166.3 million of which is currently outstanding)
|
|
|
|
$180.0 million of new term loan A indebtedness to be funded at the closing of the acquisition |
|
|
|
$175.0 million revolving credit facility (currently undrawn and maturing in February 2014) |
|
|
|
$200.0 million of new six-year term loan B indebtedness to be funded at the closing of the acquisition |
Maturities of principal amounts under the new term A borrowings will mirror the maturities of
the existing term loan A borrowings. The company currently expects that outstanding loans under the
new credit facility will bear interest at a spread over LIBOR (initially 375 basis points for term
loan A indebtedness and 450 basis points for term loan B indebtedness), and will step down
depending on the companys total leverage ratio. With respect to the term loan B indebtedness, the
terms of the facility include a contractual minimum LIBOR of 1.5%.
See Agreement to Acquire
Bravo Health above for additional information related thereto.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
At September 30, 2010, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangement requiring disclosure.
Contractual Obligations
We did not experience any material changes to contractual obligations outside the ordinary
course of business during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires our management to make a
number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amount of assets and liabilities and
the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Our estimates are
based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable
under the circumstances. Changes in estimates are recorded if and when better information becomes
available. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results
could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in estimates resulting from continuing
changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the financial statements in future
periods.
We believe that the accounting policies discussed below are those that are most important to
the presentation of our financial condition and results of operations and that require our
managements most difficult, subjective, and complex judgments. For a more complete discussion of
these and other critical accounting policies and estimates of the company, see our 2009 Form 10-K.
Medical Expense and Medical Claims Liability
Medical expense is recognized in the period in which services are provided and includes an
estimate of the cost of medical expense that has been incurred but not yet reported, or IBNR.
Medical expense includes claim payments, capitation payments, risk sharing payments and pharmacy
costs, net of rebates, as well as estimates of future payments of claims incurred, net of
reinsurance. Capitation payments represent monthly contractual fees disbursed to physicians and
other providers who are responsible for providing
medical care to members. Pharmacy costs represent payments for members prescription drug
benefits, net of rebates from drug manufacturers. Rebates are recognized when earned, according to
the contractual arrangements with the respective vendors.
26
Medical claims liability includes medical claims reported to the plans but not yet paid as
well as an actuarially determined estimate of claims that have been incurred but not yet reported.
The IBNR component of total medical claims liability is based on our historical claims data,
current enrollment, health service utilization statistics, and other related information.
Estimating IBNR is complex and involves a significant amount of judgment. Accordingly, it
represents our most critical accounting estimate. The development of IBNR includes the use of
standard actuarial developmental methodologies, including completion factors and claims trends,
which take into account the potential for adverse claims developments, and considers favorable and
unfavorable prior period developments. Actual claims payments will differ, however, from our
estimates. A worsening or improvement of our claims trend or changes in completion factors from
those that we assumed in estimating medical claims liabilities at September 30, 2010 would cause
these estimates to change in the near term and such a change could be material.
As discussed above, actual claim payments will differ from our estimates. The period between
incurrence of the expense and payment is, as with most health insurance companies, relatively
short, however, with over 90% of claims typically paid within 60 days of the month in which the
claim is incurred. Although there is a risk of material variances in the amounts of estimated and
actual claims, the variance is known quickly. Accordingly, we expect that substantially all of the
estimated medical claims payable as of the end of any fiscal period (whether a quarter or year end)
will be known and paid during the next fiscal period.
Our policy is to record the best estimate of medical expense IBNR. Using actuarial models, we
calculate a minimum amount and maximum amount of the IBNR component. To most accurately determine
the best estimate, our actuaries determine the point estimate within their minimum and maximum
range by similar medical expense categories within lines of business. The medical expense
categories we use are in-patient facility, outpatient facility, all professional expense, and
pharmacy.
We apply different estimation methods depending on the month of service for which incurred
claims are being estimated. For the more recent months, which account for the majority of the
amount of IBNR, we estimate our claims incurred by applying the observed trend factors to the
trailing twelve-month PMPM costs. For prior months, costs have been estimated using completion
factors. In order to estimate the PMPMs for the most recent months, we validate our estimates of
the most recent months utilization levels to the utilization levels in older months using
actuarial techniques that incorporate a historical analysis of claim payments, including trends in
cost of care provided, and timeliness of submission and processing of claims.
The following table illustrates the sensitivity of the completion and claims trend factors and
the impact on our operating results caused by changes in these factors that management believes are
reasonably likely based on our historical experience and September 30, 2010 data (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Completion Factor (a) |
|
|
Claims Trend Factor (b) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
in Medical |
|
|
Increase |
|
|
in Medical |
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
Claims |
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
Claims |
|
in Factor |
|
|
|
|
Liability |
|
|
in Factor |
|
|
Liability |
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
|
$ |
(5,068 |
) |
|
|
(3 |
)% |
|
$ |
(2,801 |
) |
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
(3,417 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(1,865 |
) |
|
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
(1,728 |
) |
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(931 |
) |
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
|
|
1,769 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
929 |
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Impact due to change in completion factor for the most recent three months. Completion
factors indicate how complete claims paid to date are in relation to estimates for a given
reporting period. Accordingly, an increase in completion factor results in a decrease in the
remaining estimated liability for medical claims. |
|
(b) |
|
Impact due to change in annualized medical cost trends used to estimate PMPM costs for the
most recent three months. |
27
Each month, we re-examine the previously established medical claims liability estimates based
on actual claim submissions and other relevant changes in facts and circumstances. As the liability
estimates recorded in prior periods become more exact, we increase or decrease the amount of the
estimates, and include the changes in medical expenses in the period in which the change is
identified. In every reporting period, our operating results include the effects of more completely
developed medical claims liability estimates associated with prior periods.
In establishing medical claims liability, we also consider premium deficiency situations and
evaluate the necessity for additional related liabilities. There were no required premium
deficiency accruals at September 30, 2010 or December 31, 2009.
Premium Revenue Recognition
We generate revenues primarily from premiums we receive from CMS to provide healthcare
benefits to our members. We receive premium payments on a PMPM basis from CMS to provide healthcare
benefits to our Medicare members, which premiums are fixed (subject to retroactive risk adjustment)
on an annual basis by contracts with CMS. Although the amount we receive from CMS for each member
is fixed, the amount varies among Medicare plans according to, among other things, plan benefits,
demographics, geographic location, age, gender, and the relative risk score of the membership.
We generally receive premiums on a monthly basis in advance of providing services. Premiums
collected in advance are deferred and reported as deferred revenue. We recognize premium revenue
during the period in which we are obligated to provide services to our members. Any amounts that
have not been received are recorded on the balance sheet as accounts receivable.
Our Medicare premium revenue is subject to periodic adjustment under what is referred to as
CMSs risk adjustment payment methodology based on the health risk of our members. Risk adjustment
uses health status indicators to correlate the payments to the health acuity of the member, and
consequently establishes incentives for plans to enroll and treat less healthy Medicare
beneficiaries. Under the risk adjustment payment methodology, coordinated care plans must capture,
collect, and report diagnosis code information to CMS. After reviewing the respective submissions,
CMS establishes the payments to Medicare plans generally at the beginning of the calendar year, and
then adjusts premium levels on two separate occasions on a retroactive basis. The first retroactive
risk premium adjustment for a given fiscal year generally occurs during the third quarter of such
fiscal year. This initial settlement (the Initial CMS Settlement) represents the updating of risk
scores for the current year based on the prior years dates of service. CMS then issues a final
retroactive risk premium adjustment settlement for that fiscal year in the following year (the
Final CMS Settlement). We estimate and record on a monthly basis both the Initial CMS Settlement
and the Final CMS Settlement.
We develop our estimates for risk premium adjustment settlement utilizing historical
experience and predictive actuarial models as sufficient member risk score data becomes available
over the course of each CMS plan year. Our actuarial models are populated with available risk score
data on our members. Risk premium adjustments are based on member risk score data from the previous
year. Risk score data for members who entered our plans during the current plan year, however, is
not available for use in our models; therefore, we make assumptions regarding the risk scores of
this subset of our member population.
All such estimated amounts are periodically updated as additional diagnosis code information
is reported to CMS and adjusted to actual amounts when the ultimate adjustment settlements are
either received from CMS or the company receives notification from CMS of such settlement amounts.
As a result of the variability of factors, including plan risk scores, that determine such
estimations, the actual amount of CMSs retroactive risk premium settlement adjustments could be
materially more or less than our estimates. Consequently, our estimate of our plans risk scores
for any period and our accrual of settlement premiums related thereto, may result in favorable or
unfavorable adjustments to our Medicare premium revenue and, accordingly, our profitability. There
can be no assurance that any such differences will not have a material effect on any future
quarterly or annual results of operations.
28
The following table illustrates the sensitivity of the Final CMS Settlements and the impact on
premium revenue caused by differences between actual and estimated settlement amounts that
management believes are reasonably likely, based on our historical experience and premium revenue
for the nine months ending September 30, 2010 (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increase |
|
Increase |
|
|
|
|
(Decrease) |
|
(Decrease) |
|
|
|
|
In Settlement |
|
in Estimate |
|
|
|
|
Receivable |
|
|
1.5 |
% |
|
|
|
$ |
27,795 |
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
18,530 |
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
9,265 |
|
|
(0.5 |
) |
|
|
|
|
(9,265 |
) |
Goodwill and Indefinite-Life Intangible Assets
Goodwill represents the excess of cost over fair value of assets of businesses acquired.
Goodwill and intangible assets acquired in a purchase business combination and determined to have
an indefinite useful life are not amortized, but instead are tested for impairment at least
annually. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount exceeds the
assets fair value. This determination is made at the reporting unit level and consists of two
steps. First, the company determines the fair value of the reporting unit and compares it to its
carrying amount. Second, if the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an
impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the units goodwill over the
implied fair value of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating
the fair value of the reporting units in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation. The
residual fair value after this allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting units
goodwill. Goodwill currently exists at four of our reporting units Alabama, Florida, Tennessee
and Texas.
Goodwill valuations have been determined using an income approach based on the present value
of future cash flows of each reporting unit. In assessing the recoverability of goodwill, we
consider historical results, current operating trends and results, and we make estimates and
assumptions about premiums, medical cost trends, margins and discount rates based on our budgets,
business plans, economic projections, anticipated future cash flows and regulatory data. Each of
these factors contains inherent uncertainties and management exercises substantial judgment and
discretion in evaluating and applying these factors.
Although we believe we have sufficient current and historical information available to us to
test for impairment, it is possible that actual cash flows could differ from the estimated cash
flows used in our impairment tests. We could also be required to evaluate the recoverability of
goodwill prior to the annual assessment if we experience various triggering events, including
significant declines in margins or sustained and significant market capitalization declines. These
types of events and the resulting analyses could result in goodwill impairment charges in the
future. Impairment charges, although non-cash in nature, could adversely affect our financial
results in the periods of such charges. In addition, impairment charges may limit our ability to
obtain financing in the future.
Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, we had the following assets that may be
sensitive to changes in interest rates:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
Asset Class |
|
2010 |
|
|
2009 |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
Investment securities, available for sale: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
8,883 |
|
Non-current portion |
|
|
267,099 |
|
|
|
13,574 |
|
Investment securities, held to maturity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion |
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,965 |
|
Non-current portion |
|
|
40,691 |
|
|
|
38,463 |
|
Restricted investments |
|
|
21,553 |
|
|
|
16,375 |
|
We have not purchased any of our investments for trading purposes. Investment securities,
which consist primarily of debt securities, have been categorized as either available for sale or
held to maturity. Held to maturity securities are those securities that the company does not intend
to sell, nor expect to be required to sell, prior to maturity. At September 30, 2010, investment
securities are classified as non-current assets based on the companys intention to reinvest such
assets upon sale or maturity and to not use such assets in current operations. At December 31,
2009, the company classified its investment securities based upon maturity dates. These investment
securities consist of highly liquid government and corporate debt obligations, the majority of
which mature in five years or
29
less. The investments are subject to interest rate risk and will decrease in value if market
rates increase. Because of the relatively short-term nature of our investments and our portfolio
mix of variable and fixed rate investments, however, we would not expect the value of these
investments to decline significantly as a result of a sudden change in market interest rates.
Moreover, because of our intention not to sell these investments prior to their maturity, we would
not expect foreseeable changes in interest rates to materially impair their carrying value.
Restricted investments consist of deposits, certificates of deposit, government securities, and
mortgage backed securities, deposited or pledged to state departments of insurance in accordance
with state rules and regulations. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, these restricted
assets are recorded at amortized cost and classified as long-term regardless of the contractual
maturity date because of the restrictive nature of the states requirements.
Assuming a hypothetical and immediate 1% increase in market interest rates at September 30,
2010, the fair value of our fixed income investments would decrease by approximately $7.7 million.
Similarly, a 1% decrease in market interest rates at September 30, 2010 would result in an increase
of the fair value of our investments of approximately $7.9 million. Unless we determined, however,
that the increase in interest rates caused more than a temporary impairment in our investments, or
unless we were compelled by a currently unforeseen reason to sell securities, such a change should
not affect our future earnings or cash flows.
We are subject to market risk from exposure to changes in interest rates based on our
financing, investing, and cash management activities. At September 30, 2010, we had $166.3 million
of outstanding indebtedness, bearing interest at variable rates at specified margins above either
the agent banks alternate base rate or its LIBOR rate, at our election. Holding other variables
constant, including levels of indebtedness, a 0.125% increase in interest rates would have an
estimated negative impact on pre-tax earnings and cash flows for the next twelve month period of
$207,813. Although changes in the alternate base rate or the LIBOR rate would affect the costs of
funds borrowed in the future, we believe the effect, if any, of reasonably possible near-term
changes in interest rates on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flow would not be material.
At December 31, 2009, we had interest rate swap agreements to manage a portion of our exposure
to these fluctuations. The interest rate swaps converted a portion of our indebtedness to a fixed
rate with a notional amount of $100.0 million. The company designated its interest rate swaps as
cash flow hedges which were recorded in the companys consolidated balance sheet at their fair
value. The fair value of the companys interest rate swaps at December 31, 2009 were reflected as a
liability of approximately $2.1 million and were included in other current liabilities in the
accompanying consolidated balance sheet. In connection with the New Credit Agreement, the interest
rate swap agreements were terminated and approximately $2.0 million was paid by us to the swap
counterparties to settle the terminations. As of September 30, 2010, we had not taken any other
action to cover interest rate risk and were not a party to any interest rate market risk management
activities. We may re-enter into interest rate swap agreements in the future depending on market
conditions and other factors.
Item 4: Controls and Procedures
Our senior management carried out the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange
Act, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and
Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act (Disclosure Controls). Based on
the evaluation, our senior management, including our CEO and CFO, concluded that, as of September
30, 2010, our Disclosure Controls were effective.
There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in
connection with the evaluation that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2010 that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls and
internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of
the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that
there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their
costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, with the company
have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in
decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error and mistake.
Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of
two or more people, or by management override of controls.
The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the
likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in
achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a
control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or the degree of compliance
with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a
cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and may not be
detected.
30
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
We are not currently involved in any pending legal proceeding that we believe is material to
our financial condition or results of operations. We are, however, involved from time to time in
routine legal matters and other claims incidental to our business, including employment-related
claims; claims relating to our health plans contractual relationships with providers, members, and
vendors; and claims relating to marketing practices of sales agents and agencies that are employed
by, or independent contractors to, our health plans.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should consider carefully
the risks and uncertainties previously reported and described under the captions Part I Item
1A. Risk Factors in the 2009 Form 10-K and Part II Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Quarterly
Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 (2010 First Quarter 10-Q), the
occurrence of any of which could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial
condition, and operating results. The risks identified below and previously reported and described in our 2009 Form
10-K and 2010 First Quarter 10-Q are not the only risks facing our business. Additional risks and
uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently consider to be immaterial also could
materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, and operating
results.
The following risk factors are updated or otherwise revised from the 2009 Form 10-K
and 2010 First Quarter 10-Q to reflect new or additional risks and uncertainties:
Our Records and Submissions to CMS May Contain Inaccurate or Unsupportable Information Regarding
the Risk Adjustment Scores of Our Members, Which Could Cause Us to Overstate or Understate Our
Revenue.
We maintain claims and encounter data that support the risk adjustment scores of our members,
which determine, in part, the revenue to which we are entitled for these members. This data is
submitted to CMS by us based on medical charts and diagnosis codes prepared and submitted to us by
providers of medical care. We generally rely on providers to appropriately document and support
such risk-adjustment data in their medical records and appropriately code their claims. We
sometimes experience errors in information and data reporting systems relating to claims,
encounters, and diagnoses. Inaccurate or unsupportable coding by medical providers, inaccurate
records for new members in our plans, and erroneous claims and encounter recording and submissions
could result in inaccurate premium revenue and risk adjustment payments, which are subject to
correction or retroactive adjustment in later periods. Payments that we receive in connection with
this corrected or adjusted information may be reflected in financial statements for periods
subsequent to the period in which the revenue was recorded. We, or CMS through a medical records
review and risk adjustment validation, may also find that data regarding our members risk scores,
when reconciled, requires that we refund a portion of the revenue that we received, which refund,
depending on its magnitude, could have a material adverse effect on
our results of operations or cash flows.
In connection with CMSs continuing statutory obligation to review risk score coding practices
by Medicare Advantage plans, CMS announced that it would regularly audit Medicare Advantage plans,
primarily targeted based on risk score growth, for compliance by the plans and their providers with
proper coding practices (sometimes referred to as Risk
Adjustment Data Validation Audits or RADV
Audits). The Companys Tennessee Medicare Advantage plan was selected by CMS for a RADV Audit of
the 2006 risk adjustment data used to determine 2007 premium rates. In late 2009, the Companys
Tennessee plan received from CMS the RADV Audit member sample, which CMS will use to calculate a
payment error rate for 2007 Tennessee plan premiums. In February 2010, the Company responded to the
RADV Audit request by retrieving and submitting medical records supporting diagnoses codes and
risk scores and, where appropriate, provider attestations. CMS has not indicated a schedule for
processing or otherwise responding to the Companys submissions.
CMS has indicated that payment adjustments resulting from its RADV Audits will not be limited
to risk scores for the specific beneficiaries for which errors are found but will be extrapolated
to the relevant plan population. CMSs methodology for extrapolation remains unclear, however.
Because of this lack of clarity from CMS, the Company is also currently unable to calculate with
any reasonable confidence a coding or payment error rate or predict the impact of extrapolating an
applicable error rate to 2007 Tennessee plan premiums. There can be no assurance, however, that the
conclusion of the Tennessee RADV Audit will not result in an adverse impact to the Companys
results of operations or cash flows (which may or may not be material), or that the Companys other
plans will not be randomly selected or targeted for a RADV Audit by CMS or, in the event that
another plan is so selected, that the outcome
of such RADV Audit will not result in a material adverse impact to the Companys results of
operations or cash flows.
31
We May Be Unsuccessful in Implementing Our Growth Strategy If We Are Unable to Complete
Acquisitions on Favorable Terms or Integrate the Businesses We Acquire into Our Existing
Operations.
Opportunistic acquisitions of contract rights and other health plans are an important element
of our growth strategy. We may be unable to identify and complete appropriate acquisitions in a
timely manner and in accordance with our or our investors expectations for future growth. Some of
our competitors have greater financial resources than we have and may be willing to pay more for
these businesses. In addition, we are generally required to obtain regulatory approval from one or
more state agencies when making acquisitions, which may require a public hearing, regardless of
whether we already operate a plan in the state in which the business to be acquired is located. We
may be unable to comply with these regulatory requirements for an acquisition in a timely manner,
or at all. Moreover, some sellers may insist on selling assets that we may not want or transferring
their liabilities to us as part of the sale of their companies or assets. Even if we identify
suitable acquisition targets, we may be unable to complete acquisitions or obtain the necessary
financing for these acquisitions on terms favorable to us, or at all.
To the extent we complete acquisitions, we may be unable to realize the anticipated benefits
from acquisitions because of operational factors or difficulties in integrating the acquisitions
with our existing businesses. This may include the integration of:
|
|
|
additional employees who are not familiar with our operations; |
|
|
|
new provider networks, which may operate on terms different from our existing
networks; |
|
|
|
additional members, who may decide to transfer to other healthcare providers or
health plans; |
|
|
|
disparate information technology, claims processing, and record-keeping systems; and |
|
|
|
actuarial and accounting policies, including those that require a high degree of
judgment or complex estimation processes, including estimates of IBNR claims, estimates
of risk adjustment payments, accounting for goodwill and, intangible assets, stock-based
compensation, and income tax matters. |
In the event of an acquisition or investment, we may issue stock that would dilute existing
stock ownership or incur additional debt that would restrict our cash flow. We may also assume
known and unknown liabilities, not (or only partially) covered by acquisition agreement
indemnification provisions, incur large and immediate write-offs, incur unanticipated costs, divert
managements attention from our existing business, experience risks associated with entering
markets in which we have no or limited prior experience, or lose key employees from the acquired
entities.
Additionally,
with respect to the recently announced proposed acquisition of Bravo,
our specific integration and execution risks in addition to those outlined above include:
|
|
|
our inexperience in the Philadelphia and Mid-Atlantic Medicare Advantage markets; |
|
|
|
our inexperience with the Star+Plus program in Texas; |
|
|
|
our understanding of Bravos regulatory compliance status, including with respect to
risk scores and RADV Audits, and mitigating risks and liabilities associated therewith; |
|
|
|
our ability to timely achieve anticipated cost savings through the identification and
elimination of redundant personnel and systems or otherwise; and |
|
|
|
our pre-acquisition review of Bravo Healths operations,
books, and records may have failed to adequately identify existing or potential risks and liabilities or our
post-acquisition contractual indemnification protections, including amounts held in
escrow, may be insufficient to cover such risks and liabilities. |
32
Our Substantial Debt Obligations Pursuant to Our Amended Credit Facilities Could Restrict Our
Operations.
In connection with, and conditional on, the acquisition of Bravo, we have entered into
an amended and restated credit agreement (the New Credit Agreement) providing for an aggregate of
$550.0 million in term loans and a $175.0 million revolving
credit facility. Borrowings of $380.0
million under the term facilities and availability under the existing $175.0 million revolving
credit facility, together with our cash on hand, will be used to fund the acquisition and
expenses related thereto. This will result in substantial additional indebtedness for the Company.
As of September 30, 2010, $166.3 million of debt was outstanding under the existing term loan
facility and no amounts were outstanding under the revolver.
The New Credit Agreement contains conditions precedent to extensions of credit and
representations, warranties, and covenants, including financial covenants, customary for
transactions of this type. Financial covenants include (i) a maximum leverage ratio comparing total
indebtedness to consolidated adjusted EBITDA, (ii) minimum net worth requirements for each HMO
subsidiary calculated by reference to applicable regulatory requirements, and (iii) maximum capital
expenditures, in each case as more specifically provided in the New Credit Agreement.
This indebtedness could have adverse consequences on us, including:
|
|
|
limiting our ability to compete and our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to,
changes in our business and industry |
|
|
|
increasing our vulnerability to general economic and industry conditions; and |
|
|
|
requiring a substantial portion of cash flows from operating activities to be
dedicated to debt repayment, reducing our ability to use such cash flow to fund our
operations, expenditures, and future business or acquisition opportunities. |
The New Credit Agreement contains customary events of default and, if we fail to comply with
specified financial and operating ratios, we could be in breach of the New Credit Agreement. Any
breach or default could allow our lenders to accelerate our indebtedness, charge a default interest
rate, and terminate all commitments to extend additional credit.
Our ability to maintain specified financial and operating ratios and operate within the
contractual limitations can be affected by a number of factors, many of which are beyond our
control, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to satisfy them.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Company repurchased the following shares of
its common stock:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Approximate Dollar |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Value of Shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares Purchased as |
|
|
that May Yet Be |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Part of Publicly |
|
|
Purchased Under the |
|
|
|
Total Number of |
|
|
Average Price Paid |
|
|
Announced Plans or |
|
|
Plans or |
|
Period |
|
Shares Purchased |
|
|
per Share ($) |
|
|
Programs |
|
|
Programs ($) |
|
07/01/10 07/31/10 |
|
|
201 |
|
|
|
16.53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
08/01/10 08/31/10 |
|
|
166 |
|
|
|
18.60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
09/01/10 09/30/10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
367 |
|
|
|
17.47 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares reflected as purchased in the table above are shares withheld by the Company to satisfy
the payment of tax obligations related to the vesting of shares of restricted stock.
33
In May 2010, the Companys Board of Directors authorized a stock repurchase program to
repurchase up to $100.0 million of the Companys common stock. The program authorizes purchases
made from time to time in either the open market or through privately negotiated transactions, in
accordance with SEC and other applicable legal requirements. The timing, prices, and sizes of
purchases depend upon prevailing stock prices, general economic and market conditions, and other
factors. Funds for the repurchase of shares have, and are expected to, come primarily from
unrestricted cash on hand and unrestricted cash generated from operations. The repurchase program
does not obligate the Company to acquire any particular amount of common stock and the repurchase
program may be suspended at any time at the Companys discretion. The program is scheduled to
expire on June 30, 2011. During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, the Company did not
repurchase any shares pursuant to the repurchase program. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had
repurchased 837,634 shares of its common stock under the program in open market transactions for
approximately $14.3 million, or at an average cost of $17.10 per share, and had approximately $85.7
million in remaining repurchase authority under the program.
Our ability to purchase common stock and to pay cash dividends is limited by our credit
agreements, including the New Credit Agreement, as amended in
anticipation of the Bravo acquisition. As a holding company, our ability to repurchase
common stock and to pay cash dividends is also dependent on the availability of cash dividends from
our regulated insurance subsidiaries, which are restricted by the laws of the states in which we operate
and CMS, as well as limitations under our credit agreement.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
Inapplicable.
Item 5. Other Information.
Inapplicable.
Item 6. Exhibits.
See Exhibit Index following signature page.
34
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
HEALTHSPRING, INC.
|
|
Date: October 29, 2010 |
By: |
/s/ Karey L. Witty
|
|
|
|
Karey L. Witty |
|
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief
Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and
Accounting Officer) |
|
35
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 26, 2010, by and
among the Company, BHI Acquisition Corporation, Bravo Health, Inc.,
and Shareholder Representative Services, LLC (1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
Amendment and Restatement Agreement, dated as of October 22, 2010, by
and among HealthSpring, Inc., as borrower, certain subsidiaries of
HealthSpring, Inc., as guarantors, the lenders party thereto,
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as syndication agent, and Bank of America,
N.A., as administrative agent, including the Restated Credit
Agreement attached as Exhibit A thereto (2) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1 |
|
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2 |
|
|
Certifications of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1 |
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.2 |
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed August 31,
2010. |
|
(2) |
|
Previously filed as an Exhibit to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 28,
2010. |
36