e10vk
2010
10-K
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND
EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the
fiscal year ended January 1, 2011
Commission file number 1-7685
AVERY DENNISON
CORPORATION
(Exact Name of Registrant as
Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State of
Incorporation)
|
|
95-1492269
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
150 North Orange Grove Boulevard
Pasadena, California
(Address of Principal
Executive Offices)
|
|
91103
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(626) 304-2000
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
|
|
|
Title of Each Class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which registered
|
|
Common stock, $1 par value
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Preferred Share Purchase Rights
|
|
New York Stock Exchange
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act:
Not applicable.
Indicate by a check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act. Yes þ No o
Indicate by a check mark if the registrant is not required to
file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the
Act. Yes o No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed
all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
(§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant
was required to submit and post such
files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
(§ 229.405) is not contained herein, and will not be
contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in
definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by
reference in Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in Rule
12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
Large
accelerated
filer þ
|
Accelerated
filer o
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
|
Smaller
reporting
company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the
Act). Yes o No þ
The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common
equity held by non-affiliates as of July 3, 2010, the last
business day of the registrants most recently completed
second fiscal quarter, was $3,369,883,051.
Number of shares of common stock, $1 par value, outstanding
as of January 29, 2011: 106,874,924.
The following documents are incorporated by reference into the
Parts of this report below indicated:
|
|
|
Document
|
|
Incorporated by reference into:
|
|
Portions of Annual Report to Shareholders for fiscal year ended
January 1, 2011
|
|
Parts I, II
|
Portions of Definitive Proxy Statement for Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held April 28, 2011
|
|
Parts III, IV
|
AVERY
DENNISON CORPORATION
FISCAL
YEAR 2010
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page
|
|
PART I
|
|
Item 1.
|
|
|
Business
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Item 1A.
|
|
|
Risk Factors
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Item 1B.
|
|
|
Unresolved Staff Comments
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
Item 2.
|
|
|
Properties
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
Item 3.
|
|
|
Legal Proceedings
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
Item 4.
|
|
|
(Removed and Reserved)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
|
|
Market for Registrants Common Equity, Related Stockholder
Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Item 6.
|
|
|
Selected Financial Data
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Item 7.
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of
Operations and Financial Condition
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Item 7A.
|
|
|
Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Item 8.
|
|
|
Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
Item 9.
|
|
|
Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and
Financial Disclosure
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
Item 9A.
|
|
|
Controls and Procedures
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
Item 9B.
|
|
|
Other Information
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
|
|
Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
Item 11.
|
|
|
Executive Compensation
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
Item 12.
|
|
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
and Related Stockholder Matters
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
Item 13.
|
|
|
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director
Independence
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
Item 14.
|
|
|
Principal Accountant Fees and Services
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
|
|
Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
|
PART I
Company
Background
Avery Dennison Corporation (Avery Dennison, the
Company, Registrant, or
Issuer, and which may be referred to as
we or us) was incorporated in 1977 in
the state of Delaware as Avery International Corporation, the
successor corporation to a California corporation of the same
name that had been incorporated in 1946. In 1990, the Company
merged one of its subsidiaries into Dennison Manufacturing
Company (Dennison), as a result of which Dennison
became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and in
connection with which the Companys name was changed to
Avery Dennison Corporation. You can learn more about us by
visiting our Web site at www.averydennison.com. Our Web site
address provided in this annual report on
Form 10-K
is not intended to function as a hyperlink and the information
on our Web site is not and should not be considered part of this
report and is not incorporated by reference in this report.
Business
Overview and Reporting Segments
Our businesses include the production of pressure-sensitive
materials, office and consumer products and a variety of
tickets, tags, labels and other converted products. Some
pressure-sensitive materials are sold to label printers and
converters that convert the materials into labels
and other products through embossing, printing, stamping and
die-cutting. Some are sold by us in converted form as printable
media, tapes and reflective sheeting. We also manufacture and
sell a variety of office and consumer products, other converted
products and items not involving pressure-sensitive components,
such as binders, organizing systems, markers, fasteners,
business forms, as well as tickets, tags, radio-frequency
identification (RFID) inlays and labels, and
imprinting equipment and related services for retail and apparel
manufacturers.
We are subject to certain risks described in Risk
Factors (Part I, Item 1A) and Legal
Proceedings (Part I, Item 3), including those
normally attending international and domestic operations, such
as changes in economic or political conditions in the regions in
which we conduct business, currency fluctuations, exchange
control regulations and the effect of international relations
and domestic affairs of foreign countries on the conduct of
business, competitors, tax legislation, legal proceedings, and
the availability and pricing of raw materials.
No single customer represented 10% or more of our net sales in,
or trade receivables at year end of, 2010 or 2009. However, as
of January 1, 2011, the ten largest customers by net sales
and trade receivables represented 12% and 13%, respectively, and
were primarily concentrated in our Office and Consumer Products
segment. The financial position and operations of these
customers are monitored on an ongoing basis (see Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates in Part II,
Item 7, Managements Discussion and Analysis of
Results of Operations and Financial Condition). United
States export sales are not a significant part of our business.
Backlog is not considered material in the industries in which we
compete.
Our reporting segments are:
|
|
|
|
|
Pressure-sensitive Materials;
|
|
|
|
Retail Information Services; and
|
|
|
|
Office and Consumer Products.
|
In addition to our reporting segments, we have other specialty
converting businesses comprised of several businesses that
produce specialty tapes and highly engineered labels including
RFID inlays and labels, and other converted products.
In 2008, we completed the acquisition of DM Label Group
(DM Label), a manufacturer of labels, tags and
tickets for retail and apparel applications, including woven
labels. These operations are included in our Retail Information
Services segment. See Retail Information Services
Segment below for further information.
1
In 2010, the Pressure-sensitive Materials segment contributed
approximately 56% of our total sales, while the Retail
Information Services and Office and Consumer Products segments
contributed approximately 23% and 13%, respectively, of our
total sales.
In 2010, international operations constituted a substantial
majority of our business, representing approximately 68% of our
sales. We expanded our operations, focusing particularly on
Asia, Latin America and Eastern Europe. As of January 1,
2011, we operated approximately 200 manufacturing and
distribution facilities worldwide, employed approximately
32,000 persons, and conducted business in over 60 countries.
Pressure-sensitive
Materials Segment
Our Pressure-sensitive Materials segment manufactures and sells
Fasson-, JAC-, and Avery Dennison-brand pressure-sensitive roll
materials, Avery-brand graphics and graphic films, Avery
Dennison-brand reflective products, and performance polymers
(largely used to manufacture pressure-sensitive materials). The
business of this segment tends not to be seasonal, except for
certain outdoor graphics and reflective products and operations
in Western Europe. Pressure-sensitive materials consist
primarily of papers, plastic films, metal foils and fabrics,
which are coated with Company-developed and purchased adhesives,
and then laminated with specially coated backing papers and
films. They are sold in roll or sheet form with either solid or
patterned adhesive coatings, and are available in a wide range
of face materials, sizes, thicknesses and adhesive properties.
These materials are sold to label printers and converters for
labeling, decorating, fastening, electronic data processing and
special applications on a worldwide basis.
A pressure-sensitive, or self-adhesive, material is one that
adheres to a surface by press-on contact. It generally consists
of four elements: a face material, which may be paper, metal
foil, plastic film or fabric; an adhesive, which may be
permanent or removable; a release coating; and a backing
material to protect the adhesive against premature contact with
other surfaces, and which can also serve as the carrier for
supporting and dispensing individual labels. When the products
are to be used, the release coating and protective backing are
removed, exposing the adhesive, and the label or other face
material is pressed or rolled into place.
Because self-adhesive materials are easy to apply without the
need for adhesive activation, the use of self-adhesive materials
often provides cost savings compared with other materials that
require heat- or moisture-activated adhesives. When used in
package decoration applications, the visual appeal of
self-adhesive materials often helps foster increased sales of
the product on which the materials are applied. Self-adhesive
materials provide consistent and versatile adhesion and are
available in a large selection of materials in nearly any size,
shape and color.
Graphic products consist of a variety of films and other
products sold to the architectural, commercial sign, digital
printing, and other related market segments. We also sell
durable cast and reflective films to the construction,
automotive, and fleet transportation market segments,
scrim-reinforced vinyl material for banner sign applications,
and reflective films for traffic and safety applications. Our
graphics and reflective businesses are organized on a worldwide
basis to serve the expanding commercial graphic arts market
segment, including wide-format digital printing applications. We
also manufacture and sell proprietary films that are used for
outdoor, weather-resistant applications.
Performance polymer products include a range of solvent- and
emulsion-based acrylic polymer adhesives, protective coatings
and other polymer additives for internal use, as well as for
sale to other companies.
In this segment, our larger roll materials competitors are
Raflatac (Raflatac), a subsidiary of UPM-Kymmene
(UPM), and Morgan Adhesives (MACtac), a
division of Bemis Company, Inc. For graphics and reflective
products, our largest competitor is 3M Company. We believe that
entry of competitors into the field of pressure-sensitive
adhesives and materials is limited by technical knowledge and
capital requirements. We believe that our technical knowledge,
relative size and scale of operations, ability to serve our
customers with a broad line of quality products and service
programs, distribution and brand strength, and development and
commercialization of new products are among the more significant
factors in maintaining and further developing our competitive
position.
2
Retail
Information Services Segment
Our Retail Information Services segment designs, manufactures
and sells a wide variety of brand identification and information
management products for retailers, apparel manufacturers,
distributors and industrial customers on a worldwide basis. The
business of this segment tends to be seasonal, with higher
volume generally in advance of the fall
(back-to-school),
spring, and holiday shipping periods.
Our brand identification products include woven and printed
labels, graphic tags and barcode tags. Our information
management products include price tickets, carton labels, RFID
tags and printing applications. Services include supply chain
and security management, and retail store efficiency. Our
solution-enabling products include printers, fastening and
application devices, and security management products.
In this segment, our competitors include SML Group and
Checkpoint Systems, Inc. and Shore to Shore, Inc. We believe
that our ability to serve our customers consistently wherever
they manufacture with product innovation, comprehensive brand
identification and information management product line, and
global distribution network, service, and quality are the key
advantages in maintaining and further developing our competitive
position.
Office
and Consumer Products Segment
The Office and Consumer Products segment manufactures and sells
a wide range of Avery-brand printable media and other products.
The business of this segment tends to be seasonal, with higher
volume related to the
back-to-school
season.
This segments products are concentrated in a few major
customers, primarily office products superstores, mass market
distributors and wholesalers. The loss of one or more of these
customers could have a material adverse effect on the
segments financial results. We manufacture and sell a wide
range of Avery-brand products for office, school and home uses:
printable media, such as copier, ink-jet and laser printer
labels, related computer software, ink-jet and laser printer
card and index products; and organization, filing and
presentation products, such as binders, dividers and sheet
protectors. We also offer a wide range of other stationery
products, including writing instruments, markers, adhesives and
specialty products under brand names such as Avery,
Marks-A-Lot
and HI-LITER. The extent of our product offerings varies by
geographic market.
In this segment, our larger competitors are 3M Company, Acco
Brands Corporation, Esselte Corporation and manufacturers of
private-label brands. We believe that our brand strength,
customer relationships, service excellence, large installed base
of software that facilitates the use of many of our products,
ability to serve our customers with a broad line of quality
products, and development and commercialization of new products
are among the more significant factors in maintaining and
further developing our competitive position.
Other
specialty converting businesses
Other specialty converting businesses include our specialty
tape, industrial, performance films and automotive products,
business media, RFID and security printing businesses. These
businesses manufacture and sell specialty tapes, highly
engineered films, RFID inlays and labels, pressure-sensitive
postage stamps and other converted products. These businesses
are generally not seasonal, except for certain automotive
products due to plant shutdowns by automotive manufacturers.
The specialty tape business manufactures and sells single- and
double-coated tapes and adhesive transfer tapes for use in
non-mechanical fastening, bonding and sealing systems in various
industries, which are sold to industrial and medical original
equipment manufacturers, converters, and disposable diaper
producers worldwide. These products are sold in roll form and
are available in a wide range of face materials, sizes,
thicknesses and adhesive properties.
Our automotive businesses primarily consist of custom
pressure-sensitive and heat-seal labels, pressure-sensitive
films and engineered fasteners for the automotive market
segment. These products are sold primarily to original equipment
manufacturers and their suppliers.
3
Our industrial businesses consist of custom pressure-sensitive
labels and multi-layer film constructions for durable goods,
electronics and consumer packaged goods. These products are sold
primarily to original equipment manufacturers, tier suppliers
and packaging converters.
Our performance films business produces a variety of decorative
and functional films, primarily for the automotive industry,
that are designed for injection mold applications.
Our business media business designs and markets customized
products for printing and information workflow applications.
Our RFID business manufactures RFID inlays and labels and makes
use of our existing distribution by marketing to our label
converting customers.
Our security printing business manufactures and sells
self-adhesive battery labels to a battery manufacturer, and
self-adhesive stamps to the U.S. Postal Service.
In addition, we sell specialty print-receptive films to the
industrial label market segment, metallic pigments to the
packaging industry, and proprietary wood grain and other
patterns of film laminates for housing exteriors.
We compete with a number of diverse businesses. Our largest
competitor for this group of businesses is 3M Company in
the specialty tape business. We believe that entry of
competitors into these specialty converting businesses is
limited by capital and technical requirements. We believe that
our ability to serve our customers with quality, cost effective
products and newly-developed and commercialized products are
among the more significant factors in developing and maintaining
our competitive position.
Segment
Financial Information
Certain financial information on our reporting segments and
other specialty converting businesses for the three years ended
January 1, 2011 appears in Note 12, Segment
Information, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements contained in our 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders
(our 2010 Annual Report) and is incorporated herein
by reference.
Foreign
Operations
Certain financial information about our geographic areas for the
three years ended January 1, 2011 appears in Note 12,
Segment Information, in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements contained in our 2010 Annual Report and is
incorporated herein by reference.
Research
and Development
Many of our current products are the result of our research and
development efforts. Our expenses for research, design and
testing of new products and applications by our operating units
and the Avery Research Center located in Pasadena, California
(the Research Center) were $95.6 million in
2010, $90.7 million in 2009, and $94 million in 2008.
Our operating units research efforts are directed
primarily toward developing new products and operating
techniques and improving product performance, often in close
association with customers. The Research Center supports our
operating units patent and product development work, and
focuses on improving adhesives, materials and coating processes,
as well as related product applications and ventures. These
efforts often focus on projects relating to printing and coating
technologies, as well as adhesive, release and ink chemistries.
Patents,
Trademarks and Licenses
The loss of individual patents or licenses would not be material
to us taken as a whole, nor to our operating segments
individually. Our principal trademarks are Avery, Fasson, Avery
Dennison and the Companys symbol. We believe these
trademarks are significant in the market segments in which our
products compete.
4
Manufacturing
and Environmental Matters
We use various raw materials, primarily paper, plastic films and
resins, as well as specialty chemicals purchased from various
commercial and industrial sources, which are subject to price
fluctuations. Although shortages could occur from time to time,
these raw materials are generally available.
We produce a majority of our self-adhesive materials using
water-based emulsion and hot-melt adhesive technologies.
Emissions from these operations contain small amounts of
volatile organic compounds, which are regulated by agencies of
federal, state, local and foreign governments. We continue to
evaluate the use of alternative materials and technologies to
minimize these emissions.
A portion of our manufacturing process for self-adhesive
materials utilizes certain organic solvents which, unless
controlled, would be emitted into the atmosphere. Emissions of
these substances are regulated by agencies of federal, state,
local and foreign governments. In connection with the
maintenance and acquisition of certain manufacturing equipment,
we invest in solvent capture and control units to assist in
regulating these emissions.
We have developed adhesives and adhesive processing systems that
minimize the use of solvents. Emulsion adhesives, hot-melt
adhesives or solventless silicone systems have been installed in
our facilities in Peachtree City, Georgia; Fort Wayne and
Greenfield, Indiana; Painesville, Ohio; and Quakertown,
Pennsylvania; as well as in other plants in the United States,
Argentina, Australia, Belgium, Brazil, China, Colombia, France,
Germany, India, Korea, Luxembourg, Malaysia, Mexico, the
Netherlands, South Africa, Thailand and the United Kingdom.
Based on current information, we do not believe that the cost of
complying with applicable laws regulating the discharge of
materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the
protection of the environment, will have a material effect upon
our capital expenditures, consolidated financial position or
results of operations.
For information regarding our potential responsibility for
cleanup costs at certain hazardous waste sites, see Legal
Proceedings (Part I, Item 3) and
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of
Operations and Financial Condition (Part II,
Item 7).
Available
Information
Our Annual Reports on
Form 10-K,
Quarterly Reports on
Form 10-Q,
Current Reports on
Form 8-K
and amendments to those reports filed with, or furnished to, the
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) pursuant to
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 are available free of charge on our Web site at
www.averydennison.com (in the Investors section) as
soon as reasonably practicable after electronic filing with or
furnishing to the SEC. We make available on our Web site our
(i) Corporate Governance Guidelines, (ii) Code of
Conduct, which applies to our directors, officers and employees,
(iii) Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and
Senior Financial Officers, (iv) the charters of the Audit,
Compensation and Executive Personnel, and Governance and Social
Responsibility Committees of our Board of Directors, and
(v) Audit Committee Complaint Procedures for Accounting and
Auditing Matters. These materials are also available free of
charge in print to stockholders who request them by writing to:
Secretary, Avery Dennison Corporation, 150 North Orange Grove
Boulevard, Pasadena, California 91103.
Our ability to attain our goals and objectives is materially
dependent on numerous factors and risks, including but not
limited to, the following:
As a
manufacturer, our sales and profitability are dependent upon the
cost and availability of raw materials and energy, which are
subject to price fluctuations, and our ability to control or
pass on costs of raw materials and labor. Raw material cost
increases could adversely affect our business, results of
operations and financial condition.
The pricing environment for raw materials used in a number of
our businesses continues to be challenging and volatile.
Additionally, energy costs remain volatile and unpredictable.
Inflationary and other increases in the costs of raw materials,
labor and energy have occurred in the past, recurred in 2010 and
thus far in 2011, and are expected
5
to recur. Our performance depends in part on our ability to pass
on these cost increases to customers through our selling prices
for products and to effect productivity improvements. Depending
on market dynamics and the terms of customer contracts, our
ability to recover these costs through increased pricing may be
limited. Also, it is important for us to obtain timely delivery
of materials, equipment, and other resources from suppliers, and
to make timely delivery to customers. It is possible that any of
our supplier relationships could be interrupted due to natural
and other disasters or other events, or be terminated in the
future. A disruption to our supply chain could adversely affect
our sales and profitability, and any sustained interruption in
our receipt of adequate supplies could have a material adverse
effect on our business, results of operations and financial
condition.
We are
affected by competitive conditions and customer preferences. If
we do not compete effectively, we could lose market share and
experience falling prices, adversely affecting our financial
results.
We are at risk that our competitors will expand in our key
market segments and implement new technologies making them more
competitive. Competitors also may be able to offer additional
products, services, lower prices, or other incentives that we
cannot or will not offer or that will make our products less
profitable. There can be no assurance that we will be able to
compete successfully against current and future competitors.
We also are at risk with regard to changes in customer order
patterns, such as changes in the levels of inventory maintained
by customers and the timing of customer purchases, which may be
affected by announced price changes, changes in our incentive
programs, or changes in the customers ability to achieve
incentive goals. Changes in customers preferences for our
products can also affect the demand for our products. Our
business could be negatively impacted by a decline in demand for
our products.
The
demand for our products is impacted by the effects of, and
changes in, worldwide conditions, which could have an adverse
effect on our sales and profitability.
We conduct business in over 60 countries and our domestic and
international operations are strongly influenced by matters
beyond our control, including changes in political, social,
economic and labor conditions, tax laws (including
U.S. taxes on foreign subsidiaries), and international
trade regulations (including tariffs), as well as the impact of
these changes on the underlying demand for our products.
Changes
in tax legislation throughout the world could materially impact
our results.
Our future effective tax rate and related tax balance sheet
attributes could be impacted by changes in tax legislation
throughout the world. In particular, proposed U.S. tax
legislation could materially impact our results. Currently, the
majority of our revenue is generated from customers located
outside of the U.S., and a substantial portion of our assets and
employees are located outside of the U.S. We have not
accrued income taxes and foreign withholding taxes on
undistributed earnings for most
non-U.S. subsidiaries,
because those earnings are intended to be indefinitely
reinvested in the operations of those subsidiaries. Certain
proposals could substantially increase our tax expense, which
would substantially reduce our income and have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows from
operating activities.
Changes
in economic conditions in the regions in which we conduct
business could negatively impact our customers, suppliers and
business.
A decline in economic activity in the United States and other
regions of the world can result in adverse effects on our
business, including, among other things, reduced consumer
spending, inflation, declines in asset valuations, diminished
liquidity and credit availability, significant volatility in
securities prices, rating downgrades, and fluctuations in
foreign currency exchange rates. The most recent declines in
economic conditions were experienced in the United States,
Europe, and Asia and adversely affected our customers, suppliers
and businesses similar to ours and resulted in a variety of
negative effects, such as reduction in revenues, increased
costs, lower gross margin percentages, increased allowances for
doubtful accounts
and/or
write-offs of accounts receivable, and required recognition of
impairments of capitalized assets, including goodwill and other
intangibles. A decline in economic conditions could also have
other material adverse effects on our business, results of
operations, financial condition
6
and cash flows. We are not able to predict the duration and
severity of adverse economic conditions in the U.S. and
other countries, and there can be no assurance that there will
not be further declines in economic activity.
Foreign
currency exchange rates, and fluctuations in those rates, may
affect our reported sales and profitability.
In 2010, approximately 68% of our sales were from international
operations. Fluctuations in currencies can cause transaction,
translation and other losses to us, which could negatively
impact our sales and profitability. Margins on sales of our
products in foreign countries could be materially and adversely
affected by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.
We monitor our foreign currency exposures and may, from time to
time, use hedging instruments to mitigate exposure to changes in
foreign currencies. Hedging activities may only offset a portion
of the adverse financial effects of unfavorable movements in
foreign exchange rates over the limited time the hedges are in
place.
Our
future profitability may be adversely affected if we generate
less productivity improvement than projected.
We intend to continue efforts to reduce costs in many of our
operations through facility closures, headcount reductions,
organizational restructuring, process standardization, and
manufacturing relocation, by using a variety of tools, such as
Lean Sigma and Kaizen events, to increase productivity. However,
the success of these efforts is not assured and lower levels of
productivity could reduce profitability. In addition, cost
reduction actions could expose us to additional production risk
and loss of sales.
We have
acquired companies and may continue to acquire other companies.
Acquisitions come with significant risks and uncertainties,
including those related to integration, technology and
personnel. In addition, divestures of any of our businesses or
product lines could have a material adverse effect on our
business, results of operations and financial
condition.
To grow our product lines and expand into new markets, we have
made acquisitions, including our acquisitions of Paxar
Corporation in June 2007 and DM Label Group in April 2008, and
may do so in the future. Various risks, uncertainties, and costs
are associated with the acquisitions. Effective integration of
systems, controls, objectives, personnel, product lines, market
segments, customers, suppliers, and production facilities and
cost savings can be difficult to achieve, and the results of
integration actions are uncertain, particularly given our
geographically dispersed organization. In addition, we may not
be able to retain key personnel of an acquired company and we
may not be able to successfully execute integration strategies
or achieve projected performance targets for the business
segment into which an acquired company is integrated. Both
before and after the closing of an acquisition, our business and
those of the acquired company or companies may suffer due to
uncertainty or diversion of management attention. There can be
no assurance that any acquisitions will be successful and
contribute to our profitability and we may not be able to
identify new acquisition opportunities in the future.
We continually evaluate the performance of our businesses and
may determine to sell a business or product line. Divestures may
result in significant write-offs or impairments of assets,
including goodwill and other intangible assets. Divestitures may
involve additional risks, including separation of operations,
products and personnel, diversion of management attention,
disruption to our other businesses and loss of key employees. We
may not successfully manage these or other risks we may confront
in divesting a business or product line, which could have a
material adverse effect on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
Our
customer base is diversified, but in certain portions of our
business, industry concentration has increased the importance,
and decreased the number, of significant customers.
Sales of our office and consumer products in the United States
are concentrated in a few major customers, principally office
product superstores, mass market distributors and wholesalers.
The business risk associated with this concentration, including
increased credit risks for these and other customers, and the
possibility of related bad debt write-offs, could negatively
affect our margins and profits.
7
Possible
increased difficulty in the collection of receivables as a
result of economic conditions or other market factors could have
a material effect on our results from operations and anticipated
cash from operating activities.
Although we have processes to administer credit granted to
customers and believe our allowance for doubtful accounts is
adequate, we have experienced, and in the future may experience,
losses as a result of our inability to collect our accounts
receivable. The financial difficulties of a customer could
result in reduced business with that customer. We may also
assume higher credit risk relating to receivables of a customer
experiencing financial difficulty. If these developments occur,
our inability to shift sales to other customers or to collect on
our trade accounts receivable from major customers could
substantially reduce our income and have a material adverse
effect on our results of operations and cash flows from
operating activities.
Our
inability to develop and successfully market new products and
applications could compromise our competitive
position.
The timely introduction of new products and improvements in
current products helps determine our success. Research and
development for each of our operating segments is complex and
uncertain and requires innovation and anticipation of market
trends. We could focus on products that ultimately are not
accepted by customers or we could suffer delays in production or
launch of new products that could compromise our competitive
position.
For us to
remain competitive, it is important to recruit and retain
highly-skilled employees. We also utilize various outsourcing
arrangements for certain services, and related delays, resource
availability, or errors may lead to increased costs or
disruption in our business.
There is significant competition to recruit and retain skilled
employees. Due to expansion in certain markets and the ongoing
productivity efforts and recent employee reductions, it may be
difficult for us to recruit and retain sufficient numbers of
highly-skilled employees.
We have outsourced certain services to third-party service
providers, and may outsource other services in the future to
achieve cost savings and efficiencies. Service provider delays,
resource availability, business issues or errors may lead to
disruption in our businesses
and/or
increased costs. If we do not effectively develop, implement and
manage outsourcing strategies, if third-party providers do not
perform effectively and in a timely manner, or if we experience
problems with a transition, we may not be able to achieve our
expected cost savings, and may have to experience delays or
incur additional costs to correct errors made by these service
providers.
Significant
disruption to our information technology infrastructure could
adversely impact our operations, sales, customer relations, and
financial results.
We rely on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of a large
and complex information technology infrastructure to link our
worldwide divisions. Like other information technology systems,
ours is susceptible to a number of factors including, but not
limited to, damage or interruptions resulting from a variety of
causes such as obsolescence, natural disasters, power failures,
human error, viruses and data security breaches. We upgrade and
install new systems, which, if installed or programmed
incorrectly or on a delayed timeframe, could cause delays or
cancellations of customer orders, impede the manufacture or
shipment of products, or disrupt the processing of transactions.
We have implemented certain measures to reduce our risk related
to system and network disruptions, but if a disruption occurs,
we could incur significant losses and remediation costs.
Additionally, we rely on services provided by third-party
vendors for a significant portion of our information technology
support, development and implementation, which may make our
operations vulnerable to these third parties failure to
perform adequately.
Miscalculation
of our infrastructure needs could adversely impact our financial
results.
Projected requirements of our infrastructure investments may
differ from actual levels if our volume growth is not as we
anticipate. Our infrastructure investments generally are long
term in nature, and it is possible that these investments may
not generate our expected return due to changes in the
marketplace, failures to complete
8
implementation, or other factors. Significant changes from our
expected need for
and/or
returns on infrastructure investments could adversely affect our
financial results.
Our
reputation, sales, and earnings could be affected adversely if
the quality of our products and services does not meet customer
expectations.
There are occasions when we manufacture products with quality
issues resulting from defective materials, manufacturing,
packaging or design. Many of these issues are discovered before
shipping, thus causing delays in shipping, delays in the
manufacturing process, and occasionally cancelled orders. When
issues are discovered after shipment, it can result in
additional shipping costs, discounts, refunds, and loss of
future sales. Both pre-shipping and post-shipping quality issues
can result in adverse financial consequences and a negative
impact on our reputation.
Some of
our products are sold by third parties.
Our products are not sold only by us, but by third-party
distributors and retailers as well. Some of our distributors
also market products that compete with our products. Changes in
the financial or business conditions or the purchasing decisions
of these third parties or their customers could affect our sales
and profitability.
We
outsource some of our manufacturing. If there are significant
changes in the quality control or financial or business
condition of these outsourced manufacturers, our business could
be negatively impacted.
We manufacture most of our products, but we also use third-party
manufacturers, for example, for specialty jobs or capacity
overflow. Outsourced manufacturers reduce our ability to prevent
product quality issues, late deliveries, customer
dissatisfaction and compliance with customer requirements for
labor standards. Because of possible quality issues and customer
dissatisfaction, deficiencies in the performance of outsourced
manufacturers could have an adverse effect on our business or
financial results.
Changes
in our business strategies may increase our costs and could
affect the profitability of our businesses.
As changes in our business environment occur, we may need to
adjust our business strategies to meet these changes or we may
find it otherwise necessary to restructure our operations or
particular businesses. When these changes occur, we may incur
costs to change our business strategy and may need to write down
the value of selected assets. We also may need to invest in new
businesses that have short-term returns that are negative or low
and whose ultimate business prospects are uncertain. In any of
these events, our costs may increase, our assets may be
impaired, or our returns on new investments may be lower than
prior to the change in strategy.
If our
indebtedness increases significantly or our credit ratings are
downgraded, we may have difficulty obtaining acceptable short-
and long-term financing from the capital markets.
The overall level of indebtedness and our credit ratings are
significant factors in our ability to raise short-term and
long-term financing. Higher debt levels could negatively impact
our ability to meet other business needs or opportunities and
could result in higher financing costs. The credit ratings
assigned to us also impact the interest rates on our commercial
paper and other borrowings. If our credit ratings are
downgraded, our financial flexibility could decrease and the
cost to borrow would increase. At January 1, 2011, our
variable rate borrowings were approximately $380 million.
Fluctuations in interest rates can increase borrowing costs and
have an adverse impact on our business, results of operations
and financial condition.
The level
of returns on pension and postretirement plan assets and the
actuarial assumptions used for valuation purposes could affect
our earnings and cash flows in future periods. Changes in
accounting standards and government regulations could also
affect our pension and postretirement plan expense and funding
requirements.
Assumptions used in determining projected benefit obligations
and the fair value of plan assets for our pension plan and other
postretirement benefit plans are evaluated by us in consultation
with outside actuaries. In the event that we determine that
changes are warranted in the assumptions used, such as the
discount rate, expected long-term rate of return, or health care
costs, our future pension and projected postretirement benefit
expenses and funding
9
requirements could increase or decrease. Because of changing
market conditions or changes in the participant population, the
actuarial assumptions that we use may differ from actual
results, which could have a significant impact on our pension
and postretirement liability and related costs. Funding
obligations are determined based on the value of assets and
liabilities on a specific date as required under relevant
government regulations for each plan. Future pension funding
requirements, and the timing of funding payments, could be
affected by legislation enacted by the relevant governmental
authorities.
Our share
price may be volatile.
Changes in our stock price may affect our access to, or cost of
financing from, capital markets and may affect our stock-based
compensation arrangements, among other things. Our stock price,
which has at times experienced substantial volatility, is
influenced by changes in the overall stock market and demand for
equity securities in general. Other factors, including our
financial performance, on a standalone basis and relative to our
peers and competitors, and market expectations for our future
performance, the level of perceived growth of our industries,
and other company-specific events, can also impact our share
price. There can be no assurance that our stock price will be
less volatile in the future.
An
impairment in the carrying value of goodwill could negatively
impact our consolidated results of operations and net
worth.
Goodwill is initially recorded at fair value and is not
amortized, but is reviewed for impairment at least annually (or
more frequently, if impairment indicators are present). In
assessing the carrying value of goodwill, we make estimates and
assumptions about sales, operating margins, growth rates, and
discount rates based on our business plans, economic
projections, anticipated future cash flows and marketplace data.
There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and
managements judgment in applying these factors. Goodwill
valuations have been calculated using an income approach based
on the present value of future cash flows of each reporting
unit. We could be required to evaluate the carrying value of
goodwill prior to the annual assessment if we experience
disruptions to the business, unexpected significant declines in
operating results, divestiture of a significant component of our
business or sustained market capitalization declines. These
types of events and the resulting analyses resulted in a
significant goodwill impairment charge in 2009 related to our
Retail Information Services segment and could result in other
goodwill impairment charges in the future. Impairment charges
could substantially affect our financial results in the periods
of such charges, as did the one in 2009.
Potential
adverse developments in legal proceedings, investigations and
other legal, compliance and regulatory matters, including those
involving product and trade compliance, Foreign Corrupt
Practices Act issues and other matters, could impact us
materially.
Our financial results could be materially and adversely impacted
by an unfavorable outcome to pending or future litigation and
investigations, including but not limited to, proceedings or
lawsuits related to class actions seeking treble damages for
alleged unlawful competitive practices, and other legal,
compliance and regulatory matters, including, but not limited
to, product, customs and trade compliance matters. See
Legal Proceedings (Part I, Item 3). There
can be no assurance that any investigation or litigation outcome
will be favorable.
Infringing
intellectual property rights of third parties or inadequately
acquiring or protecting our intellectual property could harm our
ability to compete or grow.
Because our products involve complex technology and chemistry,
we are involved, from time to time, in litigation involving
patents and other intellectual property. Parties have filed, and
in the future may file, claims against us alleging that we have
infringed their intellectual property rights. If we are held
liable for infringement, we could be required to pay damages,
obtain licenses or cease making or selling certain products.
There can be no assurance that licenses will be available on
commercially reasonable terms or will be available at all. The
defense of these claims, whether or not meritorious, and the
development of new technology could cause us to incur
significant costs and divert the attention of management.
10
We also have valuable intellectual property upon which third
parties may infringe. We attempt to protect and restrict access
to our intellectual property and proprietary information by
relying on the patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret
laws of the U.S. and other countries, as well as
non-disclosure agreements. However, it may be possible for a
third party to obtain our information without our authorization,
independently develop similar technologies, or breach a
non-disclosure agreement entered into with us. In addition, many
of the countries in which we operate do not have intellectual
property laws that protect proprietary rights as fully as in the
U.S. The use of our intellectual property by someone else
without our authorization could reduce or eliminate certain
competitive advantages we have, cause us to lose sales or
otherwise harm our business. Further, the costs associated with
protecting our intellectual property rights could adversely
impact our profitability.
We have obtained and applied for some U.S. and foreign
trademark registrations and patents, and will continue to
evaluate whether to register additional trademarks and seek
patents as appropriate. We cannot guarantee that any of the
pending applications will be approved by the applicable
government authorities. Further, we cannot assure that the
validity of our patents or our trademarks will not be
challenged. In addition, third parties may be able to develop
competing products using technology that avoids our patents.
We need
to comply with numerous environmental, health, and safety
laws.
Due to the nature of our business, we are subject to
environmental, health, and safety laws and regulations,
including those related to the disposal of hazardous waste from
our manufacturing processes. Compliance with existing and future
environmental, health and safety laws could subject us to future
costs or liabilities; impact our production capabilities;
constrict our ability to sell, expand or acquire facilities; and
generally impact our financial performance. We have accrued
liabilities for environmental
clean-up
sites, including sites for which governmental agencies have
designated us as a potentially responsible party, where it is
probable that a loss will be incurred and the cost or amount of
loss can be reasonably estimated. See Legal
Proceedings (Part I, Item 3). However, because
of the uncertainties associated with environmental assessment
and remediation activities, future expense to remediate
currently identified sites and other sites, which could be
identified in the future for cleanup, could be higher than the
liabilities accrued.
Healthcare
reform legislation could have an impact on our
business.
During 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and
the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 were
signed into law in the United States. Certain of the provisions
that could most significantly increase our healthcare costs in
the near term include the removal of annual plan limits, the
changes in rules regarding eligibility for dependents and the
mandate that health plans cover 100% of preventative care. In
addition, our healthcare costs could increase if the new
legislation and accompanying regulations require us to cover
more employees than we do currently or pay penalty amounts in
the event that employees do not elect our offered coverage.
While much of the cost of the recent healthcare legislation
enacted will occur in or after 2014 due to provisions of the
legislation being phased in over time, changes to our healthcare
cost structure could have an impact on our business and
operating costs.
We are
subject to risks associated with the availability and coverage
of various types of insurance.
We have various types of insurance, including property,
workers compensation and general liability. Insurance
costs can be unpredictable and may adversely impact our
financial results. We retain some portion of our insurable
risks, and therefore, unforeseen or catastrophic losses in
excess of insured limits could have a material adverse effect on
our financial results.
Changes
in our tax rates could affect our future results.
Our future effective tax rates could be affected by changes in
the mix of earnings in countries with differing statutory tax
rates, expirations of tax holidays, changes in the valuation of
deferred tax assets and liabilities, or changes in tax laws and
regulations or their interpretation. We are subject to the
regular examination of our income tax returns by various tax
authorities. We regularly assess the likelihood of adverse
outcomes resulting from these
11
examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for
taxes. There can be no assurance that the outcomes from these
examinations will not have a material adverse effect on our
financial condition and operating results.
The
amount of various taxes we pay is subject to ongoing compliance
requirements and audits by federal, state and foreign tax
authorities.
Our estimate of the potential outcome of uncertain tax issues is
subject to our assessment of relevant risks, facts, and
circumstances existing at that time. We use these assessments to
determine the adequacy of our provision for income taxes and
other tax-related accounts. Our future results may include
favorable or unfavorable adjustments to our estimated tax
liabilities in the period the assessments are made or resolved,
which may impact our effective tax rate
and/or our
financial results.
We have
deferred tax assets that we may not be able to use under certain
circumstances.
If we are unable to generate sufficient future taxable income in
certain jurisdictions, or if there is a significant change in
the time period within which the underlying temporary
differences become taxable or deductible, we could be required
to increase our valuation allowances against our deferred tax
assets. This would result in an increase in our effective tax
rate and would have an adverse effect on our future operating
results. In addition, changes in statutory tax rates may change
our deferred tax assets or liability balances, with either
favorable or unfavorable impact on our effective tax rate. Our
deferred tax assets may also be impacted by new legislation or
regulation.
The risks described above are not exclusive. If any of the above
risks actually occur, our business, results of operations, cash
flows or financial condition could suffer, which might cause the
value of our securities to decline.
|
|
Item 1B.
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS.
|
None.
As of January 1, 2011, we operated approximately 40
principal manufacturing facilities in excess of
100,000 square feet. The locations of such principal
facilities and the operating segments for which they presently
are used are as follows:
Pressure-sensitive
Materials Segment
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Peachtree City, Georgia; Fort Wayne, Greenfield and Lowell,
Indiana; Fairport Harbor, Mentor and Painesville, Ohio; and
Quakertown, Pennsylvania
|
Foreign
|
|
Vinhedo, Brazil; Kunshan, China; Champ-sur-Drac, France; Gotha
and Schwelm, Germany; Rodange, Luxembourg; Alphen and
Hazerswoude, the Netherlands; Pune, India; and Cramlington,
United Kingdom
|
Retail
Information Services Segment
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Greensboro and Lenoir, North Carolina; Miamisburg, Ohio
|
Foreign
|
|
Kunshan, Nansha, Panyu, Shenzen, and Suzhou, China; Loehne and
Sprockhovel, Germany; Ancarano, Italy; and Taichung, Taiwan
|
Office
and Consumer Products Segment
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Chicopee, Massachusetts; and Meridian, Mississippi
|
Foreign
|
|
Oberlaindern, Germany; and Juarez and Tijuana, Mexico
|
12
Other
specialty converting businesses
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
Schererville, Indiana; Painesville, Ohio; and Clinton, South
Carolina
|
Foreign
|
|
Turnhout, Belgium; and Kunshan, China
|
In addition to our principal manufacturing facilities described
above, our other principal facilities include our corporate
headquarters facility and research center in Pasadena,
California, and our divisional offices located in Brea,
California; Framingham, Massachusetts; Mentor, Ohio; Hong Kong
and Kunshan, China; Leiden, the Netherlands; and Zug,
Switzerland.
We own all of our principal properties identified above, except
for certain facilities in Brea, California; Hong Kong and
Panyu, China; Loehne, Oberlaindern, and Sprockhovel, Germany;
Juarez, Mexico; Greensboro, North Carolina; Mentor, Ohio; and
Zug, Switzerland, which are leased.
All buildings owned or leased are considered suitable and
generally adequate for our present needs. We generally expand
production capacity and provide facilities as needed to meet
increased demand. Owned buildings and plant equipment are
insured against major losses from fire and other usual business
risks, subject to deductibles. We are not aware of any material
defects in title to, or significant encumbrances on, our
properties except for certain mortgage liens.
|
|
Item 3.
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS.
|
As of January 1, 2011, we have been designated by the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
and/or other
responsible state agencies as a potentially responsible party
(PRP) at fourteen waste disposal or waste recycling
sites, which are the subject of separate investigations or
proceedings concerning alleged soil
and/or
groundwater contamination and for which no settlement of our
liability has been agreed. We are participating with other PRPs
at such sites, and anticipate that our share of cleanup costs
will be determined pursuant to remedial agreements entered into
in the normal course of negotiations with the EPA or other
governmental authorities.
We have accrued liabilities for these and certain other sites,
including sites in which governmental agencies have designated
us as a PRP, where it is probable that a loss will be incurred
and the cost or amount of loss can be reasonably estimated.
However, because of the uncertainties associated with
environmental assessment and remediation activities, future
expense to remediate the currently identified sites and any
sites that could be identified in the future for cleanup could
be higher than the liabilities accrued.
As of January 1, 2011, our estimated accrued liability
associated with environmental remediation was approximately
$46 million. See also Note 8,
Contingencies, in the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements of our 2010 Annual Report, which is
incorporated herein by reference.
On May 21, 2003, The Harman Press filed in the Superior
Court for the County of Los Angeles, California, a purported
class action on behalf of indirect purchasers of label stock
against us, UPM and Raflatac, seeking treble damages and other
relief for alleged unlawful competitive practices, with
allegations including that the defendants attempted to limit
competition among themselves through anticompetitive
understandings. Three similar complaints were filed in various
California courts. In November 2003, on petition from the
parties, the California Judicial Council ordered the cases be
coordinated for pretrial purposes. The cases were assigned to a
coordination trial judge in the Superior Court for the City and
County of San Francisco on March 30, 2004. On
September 30, 2004, the Harman Press amended its complaint
to add MACtac as a defendant. On January 21, 2005, American
International Distribution Corporation filed a purported class
action on behalf of indirect purchasers in the Superior Court
for Chittenden County, Vermont. Similar actions were filed by
Richard Wrobel, on February 16, 2005, in the District Court
of Johnson County, Kansas; and by Chad and Terry Muzzey, on
February 16, 2005, in the District Court of Scotts Bluff
County, Nebraska. On February 17, 2005, Judy Benson filed a
purported multi-state class action on behalf of indirect
purchasers in the Circuit Court for Cocke County, Tennessee.
Without admitting liability, we agreed to pay plaintiffs
$2 million to resolve all claims related to the purported
state class actions in the states of Kansas, Nebraska, Tennessee
and Vermont. Those settlements were approved by the Tennessee
court on March 12, 2010 and the complaints in those state
actions were dismissed with prejudice. We recorded
$2 million in the third quarter of 2009 in respect of the
settlement of those claims, and made that payment on
December 28, 2009. Also without admitting liability, we
paid $2.5 million on July 15, 2010 to resolve all
claims in the California action.
13
On December 8, 2010, the California court granted final
approval of the settlement and dismissed all claims against us
with prejudice. In respect of settlement of this claim, we
recorded $.7 in the fourth quarter of 2009 and $.3 million
and $1.5 million in the first and second quarters of 2010,
respectively.
We are involved in various other lawsuits, claims, inquiries,
and other regulatory and compliance matters, which are either
routine to the nature of our business, or based upon current
information, if determined to be adverse to us, are not expected
to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of
operations, or cash flows.
|
|
Item 4.
|
(REMOVED
AND RESERVED).
|
14
PART II
|
|
Item 5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.
|
Market
for Registrants Common Equity and Related Stockholder
Matters
The information called for by subsections (a) of this Item
appears under Corporate Information Stock and
Dividend Data in our 2010 Annual Report and is
incorporated herein by reference.
Issuer
Purchases of Equity Securities
On January 27, 2011, the Companys Board of Directors
authorized the repurchase of up to 5 million additional shares
of the Companys outstanding common stock, increasing the
balance of shares available for repurchase to approximately 6
million. Repurchased shares may be reissued under the
Companys stock option and incentive plans or used for
other corporate purposes.
Repurchases by the Company or affiliated purchasers
(as defined in
Rule 10b-18(a)(3)
of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of registered
equity securities during the fourth quarter of 2010 are listed
in the following table.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maximum Number
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Number of Shares
|
|
of Shares
|
|
|
Total Number
|
|
Average Price
|
|
Purchased as
|
|
that may yet
|
|
|
of Shares
|
|
Paid per
|
|
Part of Publicly
|
|
be Purchased Under
|
|
|
Purchased
|
|
Share
|
|
Announced Plans
|
|
the Plans
|
|
|
(Shares in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
|
October 3, 2010 October 30, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
October 31, 2010 November 27, 2010
|
|
|
433.9
|
|
|
$
|
37.77
|
|
|
|
433.9
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 28, 2010 January 1, 2011
|
|
|
2,249.3
|
|
|
$
|
41.03
|
|
|
|
2,249.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
2,683.2
|
|
|
$
|
40.50
|
|
|
|
2,683.2
|
|
|
|
1,269.7
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Shares do not include the impact of .3 million repurchased
shares that settled in January 2011 and 5 million
additional shares that were authorized for repurchase in January
2011. |
|
|
Item 6.
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA.
|
Selected financial data for each of the Companys last five
fiscal years appears under Five-year Summary in our
2010 Annual Report and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 7.
|
MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATION AND FINANCIAL
CONDITION.
|
The information called for by this Item is contained under
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of
Operations and Financial Condition in our 2010 Annual
Report and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
|
The information called for by this Item is contained under
Market-Sensitive Instruments and Risk Management in
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Results of
Operations and Financial Condition in our 2010 Annual
Report and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
|
The information called for by this Item is contained in our 2010
Annual Report (including the Consolidated Financial Statements
and the Notes thereto, Statement of Management Responsibility
for Financial Statements and
15
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting, and the Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm) and is incorporated herein by reference.
|
|
Item 9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
|
None.
|
|
Item 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES.
|
Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the
end of the period covered by this report, the Company carried
out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of its management, including the Chief Executive
Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of
the design and operation of the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(e)
or 15d-15(e)
of the Exchange Act). Based upon that evaluation, the
Companys Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that the Companys disclosure
controls and procedures are effective to provide reasonable
assurance that information is recorded, processed, summarized
and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs
rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to the Companys management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer as
appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting. Management is responsible for
establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over
financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f)
or 15d-15(f)
of the Exchange Act). Under the supervision and with the
participation of the Companys management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, the
Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its
internal control over financial reporting based upon the
framework in Internal Control Integrated
Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that
evaluation, the Companys management concluded that its
internal control over financial reporting was effective as of
January 1, 2011. (See Managements Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting in our 2010 Annual Report.)
Managements assessment of the effectiveness of the
Companys internal control over financial reporting as of
January 1, 2011 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated
in their Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
in our 2010 Annual Report, and is incorporated herein by
reference.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial
Reporting. There have been no changes in the
Companys internal control over financial reporting during
the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys
internal control over financial reporting.
|
|
Item 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION.
|
None.
16
PART III
|
|
Item 10.
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.
|
The information concerning directors and corporate governance
called for by this Item is incorporated herein by reference from
the definitive proxy statement for our Annual Meeting of
Stockholders to be held on April 28, 2011 (our 2011
Proxy Statement), which will be filed with the SEC
pursuant to Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end
of the fiscal year covered by this report. The information
concerning executive officers called for by this Item appears on
the next page of this report. The information concerning any
late filings under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934, as amended, is incorporated by reference from our
2011 Proxy Statement.
We have adopted a Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer
and Senior Financial Officers (the Code), which
applies to our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer,
and Controller. Our Code is available on our Web site,
www.averydennison.com, in the Investors section. We
will satisfy disclosure requirements under Item 5.05 of
Form 8-K
regarding any amendment to, or waiver from, any provision of the
Code that applies to these officers disclosing the nature of
such amendment or waiver on our Web site or in a current report
on
Form 8-K.
Our Code of Conduct, which applies to our directors, officers
and employees, is also available on our Web site in the
Investors section. Our Web site address is not
intended to function as a hyperlink, and the contents of the Web
site are not a part of this
Form 10-K,
nor are they incorporated herein by reference.
The information concerning our Audit Committee called for by
this Item is incorporated by reference from our 2011 Proxy
Statement, which will be filed with the SEC pursuant to
Regulation 14A within 120 days of the end of the
fiscal year covered by this report.
17
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS OF AVERY
DENNISON(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Served as
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Executive Officer
|
|
Former Positions and Offices
|
Name
|
|
Age
|
|
since
|
|
with Avery Dennison
|
|
Dean A.
Scarborough(2)
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
August 1997
|
|
2005-2010
|
|
President and Chief Executive Officer
|
Chairman, President and Chief
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2000-2005
|
|
President and Chief Operating Officer
|
Executive Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mitchell R. Butier
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
March 2007
|
|
2007-2010
|
|
Vice President, Controller and Chief
|
Senior Vice President
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounting Officer
|
and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004-2006
|
|
Vice President, Finance, Retail Information Services
|
Lori J. Bondar
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
June 2010
|
|
2008-2010
|
|
Vice President, Controller
|
Vice President, Controller
and Chief Accounting Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2005-2008
2004-2005
|
|
Consultant, Palomar Consulting
Group(3)
Chief Financial Officer, Acetex
Corporation(3)
|
Diane B. Dixon
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
December 1985
|
|
1997-2000
|
|
Vice President, Worldwide
|
Senior Vice President,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Communications and Advertising
|
Communications and Corporate Affairs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Anne Hill
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
May 2007
|
|
2004-2006
|
|
Vice President,
|
Senior Vice President and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Human Resources,
|
Chief Human Resources Officer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chiron
Corporation(3)
|
Robert M. Malchione
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
August 2000
|
|
2000-2001
|
|
Senior Vice President,
|
Senior Vice President,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate Strategy
|
Corporate Strategy and Technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Susan C. Miller
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
March 2008
|
|
2008-2009
|
|
Senior Vice President and General Counsel
|
Senior Vice President,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2007-2008
|
|
Vice President and General Counsel
|
General Counsel and Secretary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1998-2006
|
|
Assistant General Counsel
|
Karyn E. Rodriguez
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
June 2001
|
|
1999-2001
|
|
Assistant Treasurer, Corporate Finance
|
Vice President and Treasurer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Investments
|
Timothy G. Bond
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
March 2008
|
|
2007-2008
|
|
Vice President and General Manager,
|
Group Vice President,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Office Products Group
|
Office Products
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2003-2006
|
|
Vice President and General Manager, Office Products North America
|
Timothy S. Clyde
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
February 2001
|
|
2001-2007
|
|
Group Vice President, Office Products
|
Group Vice President,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specialty Materials and Converting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. Shawn Neville
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
June 2009
|
|
2008-2009
|
|
Chief Executive Officer,
|
Group Vice President,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Boathouse
Sports(3)
|
Retail Information Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004-2008
|
|
President, Keds Division, Collective Brands,
Inc.(3)
|
Donald A. Nolan
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
March 2008
|
|
2005-2007
|
|
Senior Vice President, Global Packaging
|
Group Vice President,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Automotive Coatings,
|
Roll Materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valspar
Corporation(3)
|
John M. Sallay
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
March 2009
|
|
2008-2009
|
|
Senior Vice President, Strategy,
|
Senior Vice President,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Staples,
Inc.(3)
|
New Growth Platforms
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2004-2007
|
|
Chief Executive Officer, Manifold
|
Roll Materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products(3)
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
All officers are elected to serve a one-year term and until
their successors are elected and qualify. |
|
(2) |
|
Mr. Scarborough was initially elected Chairman, President
and Chief Executive Officer effective April 22, 2010. |
|
(3) |
|
Business experience during past five years prior to service with
the Company. |
18
|
|
Item 11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION.
|
The information called for by this Item is incorporated by
reference from our 2011 Proxy Statement, which will be filed
with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A within
120 days of the end of the fiscal year covered by this
report.
|
|
Item 12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
|
The information called for by this Item is incorporated by
reference from our 2011 Proxy Statement, which will be filed
with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A within
120 days of the end of the fiscal year covered by this
report.
|
|
Item 13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE.
|
The information called for by this Item is incorporated by
reference from our 2011 Proxy Statement, which will be filed
with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A within
120 days of the end of the fiscal year covered by this
report.
|
|
Item 14.
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.
|
The information called for by this Item is incorporated by
reference from our 2011 Proxy Statement, which will be filed
with the SEC pursuant to Regulation 14A within
120 days of the end of the fiscal year covered by this
report.
19
PART IV
|
|
Item 15.
|
EXHIBITS
AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.
|
(a) Financial Statements, Financial Statement Schedule and
Exhibits
(1) (2) Financial statements and financial statement
schedule filed as part of this report are listed in the
accompanying Index to Financial Statements and Financial
Statement Schedule.
(3) Exhibits filed as a part of this report are listed in
the Exhibit Index, which follows the financial statements
and schedules referred to above. Each management contract or
compensatory plan or arrangement required to be filed as an
exhibit to this
Form 10-K
pursuant to Item 15(c) is identified as such on the
Exhibit Index.
(b) The Exhibits required to be filed by Item 601 of
Regulation S-K,
are set forth on the accompanying Exhibit Index attached
hereto and are incorporated herein by reference.
(c) The financial statement schedules required by
Regulation S-X,
which are excluded from our 2010 Annual Report by
Rule 14a-3(b)(1)
and which are required to be filed as a financial statement
schedule to this report, are set forth on the accompanying Index
to Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule and are
incorporated herein by reference.
20
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
Avery Dennison Corporation
|
|
|
|
By
|
/s/
Mitchell R. Butier
|
Mitchell R. Butier
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Dated:
February 25, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons
on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and as of the
dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Dean
A. Scarborough
Dean
A. Scarborough
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mitchell
R. Butier
Mitchell
R. Butier
|
|
Senior Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Lori
J. Bondar
Lori
J. Bondar
|
|
Vice President and Controller, and
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Bradley
A. Alford
Bradley
A. Alford
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Peter
K. Barker
Peter
K. Barker
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Rolf
Börjesson
Rolf
Börjesson
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ John
T. Cardis
John
T. Cardis
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ken
C. Hicks
Ken
C. Hicks
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Peter
W. Mullin
Peter
W. Mullin
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ David
E. I. Pyott
David
E. I. Pyott
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
21
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signature
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Debra
L. Reed
Debra
L. Reed
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Patrick
T. Siewert
Patrick
T. Siewert
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Julia
A. Stewart
Julia
A. Stewart
|
|
Director
|
|
February 25, 2011
|
22
AVERY
DENNISON CORPORATION
INDEX TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND FINANCIAL
STATEMENT
SCHEDULE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data incorporated by reference from the attached portions of the
2010 Annual Report to Shareholders of Avery Dennison Corporation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Financial Statements:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets at January 1, 2011 and
January 2, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Operations for 2010, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders Equity for 2010,
2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for 2010, 2009 and 2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement of Management Responsibility for Financial Statements
and Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
majority-owned subsidiaries. Investments representing less than
20 percent are accounted for using the cost method of
accounting.
With the exception of the Consolidated Financial Statements,
Statement of Management Responsibility for Financial Statements
and Managements Report on Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting and the Report of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm thereon listed above, and certain information
referred to in Items 1, 5, 6, 7, and 7A of this report, the
information for which is included in the Companys 2010
Annual Report to Shareholders and is incorporated herein by
reference, the Companys 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders
is not to be deemed filed as part of this report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data submitted herewith:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
S-4
|
|
|
|
|
|
All other schedules are omitted since the required information
is not present or is not present in amounts sufficient to
require submission of the schedule, or because the information
required is included in the consolidated financial statements
and notes thereto.
S-1
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
ON FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE
To the Board of Directors
of Avery Dennison Corporation:
Our audits of the consolidated financial statements and of the
effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting
referred to in our report dated February 25, 2011 appearing in
the 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders of Avery Dennison
Corporation (which report and consolidated financial statements
are incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K)
also included an audit of the financial statement schedule
listed in Item 15(a)(2) of this
Form 10-K.
In our opinion, this financial statement schedule presents
fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth
therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated
financial statements.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
February 25, 2011
S-2
SCHEDULE VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
SCHEDULE II
VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS AND RESERVES
(In
millions)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at
|
|
Charged to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
Beginning
|
|
Costs and
|
|
From
|
|
Deductions
|
|
at End
|
|
|
of Year
|
|
Expenses
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
From
Reserves(a)
|
|
of Year
|
|
2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
41.3
|
|
|
$
|
6.7
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
(9.1
|
)
|
|
$
|
38.9
|
|
Allowance for sales returns
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(12.0
|
)
|
|
|
12.5
|
|
Inventory reserve
|
|
|
65.4
|
|
|
|
17.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23.7
|
)
|
|
|
59.2
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
|
|
115.4
|
|
|
|
2.5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2.3
|
)
|
|
|
115.6
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
41.8
|
|
|
$
|
11.5
|
|
|
$
|
.4
|
|
|
$
|
(12.4
|
)
|
|
$
|
41.3
|
|
Allowance for sales returns
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
|
|
7.8
|
|
|
|
.3
|
|
|
|
(8.7
|
)
|
|
|
14.9
|
|
Inventory reserve
|
|
|
64.6
|
|
|
|
23.1
|
|
|
|
2.3
|
|
|
|
(24.6
|
)
|
|
|
65.4
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
|
|
109.2
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.2
|
|
|
|
115.4
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts
|
|
$
|
45.8
|
|
|
$
|
10.1
|
|
|
$
|
.4
|
|
|
$
|
(14.5
|
)
|
|
$
|
41.8
|
|
Allowance for sales returns
|
|
|
18.4
|
|
|
|
7.6
|
|
|
|
1.3
|
|
|
|
(11.8
|
)
|
|
|
15.5
|
|
Inventory reserve
|
|
|
77.3
|
|
|
|
21.2
|
|
|
|
4.0
|
|
|
|
(37.9
|
)
|
|
|
64.6
|
|
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets
|
|
|
147.6
|
|
|
|
(45.3
|
)
|
|
|
9.6
|
|
|
|
(2.7
|
)
|
|
|
109.2
|
|
|
|
|
(a) |
|
Deductions from reserves include currency translation
adjustments. |
S-3
CONSENT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
We hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in the
Registration Statements on
Form S-3
(File Nos.
333-38905,
333-64558,
333-103204,
333-120239,
333-147369,
and
333-169954)
and
Form S-8
(File Nos.
33-54411,
33-58921,
33-63979,
333-38707,
333-38709,
333-107370,
33-107371,
333-107372,
333-109814,
333-124495,
333-143897,
333-152508,
333-166832,
333-166836,
and
333-166837)
of Avery Dennison Corporation of our report dated February 25,
2011 relating to the financial statements and the effectiveness
of internal control over financial reporting, which appears in
the Companys 2010 Annual Report to Shareholders, which is
incorporated in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
We also consent to the incorporation by reference of our report
dated February 25, 2011 relating to the financial statement
schedule, which appears in this
Form 10-K.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers
LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Los Angeles, California
February 25, 2011
S-4
AVERY
DENNISON CORPORATION
EXHIBIT INDEX
For the
Year Ended January 1, 2011
INCORPORATED
BY REFERENCE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Filed as
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Item
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Document(1)
|
|
|
(3
|
.1)
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as filed August 2, 2002
with the Office of Delaware Secretary of State
|
|
|
3
|
(i)
|
|
Third Quarterly Report for 2002 on Form 10-Q, filed November 12,
2002
|
|
(3
|
.1.1)
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of
Incorporation, as filed April 23, 2010 with the Office of
Delaware Secretary of State
|
|
|
3
|
.1.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 27, 2010.
|
|
(3
|
.2)
|
|
By-laws, as amended and restated on April 22, 2010
|
|
|
3
|
.2.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 27, 2010.
|
|
(4
|
.2)
|
|
Indenture, dated as of March 15, 1991, between Registrant and
Security Pacific National Bank, as Trustee (the
Indenture)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 33-39491), filed
March 19, 1991
|
|
(4
|
.2.2)
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 16, 1993,
between Registrant and BankAmerica National Trust Company, as
successor Trustee (the Supplemental Indenture)
|
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 33-59642), filed
March 17, 1993
|
|
(4
|
.2.5)
|
|
Officers Certificate establishing a series of Securities
entitled Medium-Term Notes, Series C under the
Indenture, as amended by the Supplemental Indenture
|
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed May 12, 1995
|
|
(4
|
.2.6)
|
|
Officers Certificate establishing a series of Securities
entitled Medium-Term Notes, Series D under the
Indenture, as amended by the Supplemental Indenture
|
|
|
4
|
.8
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 16, 1996
|
|
(4
|
.3)
|
|
Indenture, dated July 3, 2001, between Registrant and
J.P. Morgan Trust Company, National Association (successor
to Chase Manhattan Bank and Trust Company, National
Association), as trustee (2001 Indenture)
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-64558), filed
July 3, 2001
|
|
(4
|
.3.1)
|
|
Officers Certificate establishing two series of Securities
entitled 4.875% Notes due 2013 and
6.000% Notes due 2033, respectively, each under
the 2001 Indenture
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 16, 2003
|
|
(4
|
.3.2)
|
|
4.875% Notes Due 2013
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 16, 2003
|
|
(4
|
.3.3)
|
|
6.000% Notes Due 2033
|
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 16, 2003
|
i
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Filed as
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Item
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Document(1)
|
|
|
(4
|
.5)
|
|
Indenture, dated as of September 25, 2007, between Registrant
and The Bank of New York Trust Company, N.A. (Bank of
NY)
|
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 1, 2007
|
|
(4
|
.5.1)
|
|
6.625% Subsidiary Notes due 2017
|
|
|
99
|
.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 1, 2007
|
|
(4
|
.6)
|
|
Indenture, dated as of November 20, 2007, between Registrant and
Bank of NY
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2008
|
|
(4
|
.7)
|
|
Purchase Contract and Pledge Agreement, dated as of November 20,
2007, between Avery Dennison and Bank of NY, as Purchase
Contract Agent, and Bank of NY as Collateral Agent, Custodial
Agent and Securities Intermediary
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2007
|
|
(4
|
.8)
|
|
Indenture, dated as of November 20, 2007, between Avery Dennison
and Bank of NY
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2007
|
|
(4
|
.9)
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture between Avery Dennison and Bank of
NY, as Trustee, dated as of November 20, 2007
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2007
|
|
(4
|
.10)
|
|
Form of Remarketing Agreement
|
|
|
4
|
.4
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2007
|
|
(4
|
.11)
|
|
Form of Corporate HiMEDS Unit Certificate
|
|
|
4
|
.5
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2007
|
|
(4
|
.12)
|
|
Form of Treasury HiMEDS Unit Certificate
|
|
|
4
|
.6
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2007
|
|
(4
|
.13)
|
|
Form of 5.350% Senior Notes due 2020
|
|
|
4
|
.7
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 20, 2007
|
|
(4
|
.14)
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture between Avery Dennison and The
Bank of NYTrust Company, as Trustee, dated as of April 13, 2010
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 13, 2010
|
|
(4
|
.15)
|
|
Form of 5.375% Senior Notes due 2020
|
|
|
4
|
.3
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 13, 2010
|
|
(4
|
.16)
|
|
Remarketing Agreement between Avery Dennison and the Remarketing
Agent named therein, dated as of September 27, 2010
|
|
|
1
|
.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed November 15, 2010
|
|
(10
|
.1)
|
|
Avery Dennison Office Products Company (ADOPC)
Credit Agreement, amended and restated, dated August 7, 2008
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Second Quarterly Report for 2008 on Form 10-Q, filed August 7,
2008
|
|
(10
|
.1.1)
|
|
ADOPC Second Amendment to Credit Agreement
|
|
|
99
|
.3
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 27, 2009
|
|
(10
|
.2)
|
|
Revolving Credit Agreement (RCA), amended and
restated, August 10, 2007
|
|
|
10
|
.2.2
|
|
Third Quarterly Report for 2007 on Form 10-Q, filed November 7,
2007
|
ii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Filed as
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Item
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Document(1)
|
|
|
(10
|
.2.1)
|
|
Second Amendment to First Amended and Restated RCA
|
|
|
99
|
.4
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed January 27, 2009
|
|
(10
|
.3)
|
|
*Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
1981 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 29, 1982
|
|
(10
|
.4)
|
|
*Non-Employee Director Compensation Summary
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
2006 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 28, 2007
|
|
(10
|
.5)
|
|
*Executive Medical and Dental Plan (description)
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
1981 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 29, 1982
|
|
(10
|
.8)
|
|
*Employment Agreement with D.A .Scarborough
|
|
|
10
|
.8.5
|
|
First Quarterly Report for 2005 on Form 10-Q, filed May 12, 2005
|
|
(10
|
.8.3)
|
|
*Form of Employment Agreement
|
|
|
10
|
.8.4
|
|
First Quarterly Report for 2004 on Form 10-Q, filed May 6, 2004
|
|
(10
|
.8.3.1)
|
|
*Forms of Employment Agreement
|
|
|
10
|
.8.3.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 11, 2008
|
|
(10
|
.8.3.2)
|
|
*Forms of Amendment to Employment Agreement
|
|
|
10
|
.8.3.2
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 11, 2008
|
|
(10
|
.8.3.2a)
|
|
*Form of Amendment to Employment Agreement
|
|
|
10
|
.8.3.2
|
|
Second Quarterly Report for 2009 on Form 10-Q, filed August 12,
2009
|
|
(10
|
.8.3.3)
|
|
*Form of Second Amendment to Employment Agreement
|
|
|
10
|
.8.3.3
|
|
Second Quarterly Report for 2009 on Form 10-Q, filed August 12,
2009
|
|
(10
|
.8.4)
|
|
*Retention Agreement with D.R. OBryant
|
|
|
10
|
.8.6
|
|
First Quarterly Report for 2005 on Form 10-Q, filed May 12, 2005
|
|
(10
|
.8.4.1)
|
|
*Amendment to Retention Agreement
|
|
|
10
|
.8.4.1
|
|
Second Quarterly Report for 2009 on Form 10-Q, filed August 12,
2009
|
|
(10
|
.9)
|
|
*Executive Group Life Insurance Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
1982 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 25, 1983
|
|
(10
|
.10)
|
|
*Form of Indemnity Agreement between Registrant and certain
directors and Officers
|
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
1986 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 27, 1987
|
|
(10
|
.10.1)
|
|
*Form of Indemnity Agreement between Registrant and certain
directors and Officers
|
|
|
10
|
.10.1
|
|
1993 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 18, 1994
|
|
(10
|
.11)
|
|
*Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, amended and restated
(SERP)
|
|
|
10
|
.11.1
|
|
Second Quarterly Report for 2009 on Form 10-Q, filed August 12,
2009
|
|
(10
|
.11.2)
|
|
*Letter of Grant to D.A. Scarborough under SERP
|
|
|
10
|
.11.2.1
|
|
Second Quarterly Report for 2009 on Form 10-Q, filed August 12,
2009
|
|
(10
|
.11.2.1)
|
|
*Letter Agreement with D.A. Scarborough regarding SERP benefits
|
|
|
10
|
.11.2.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 15, 2010
|
|
(10
|
.11.4)
|
|
*Letter of Grant to D.R. OBryant under SERP
|
|
|
10
|
.11.4.1
|
|
Second Quarterly Report for 2009 on Form 10-Q, filed August 12,
2009
|
|
(10
|
.11.4.1)
|
|
*Letter Agreement with D.R. OBryant regarding SERP benefits
|
|
|
10
|
.11.4.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 15, 2010
|
|
(10
|
.12)
|
|
*Complete Restatement and Amendment of Executive Deferred
Compensation Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 1995
|
|
(10
|
.13)
|
|
*Retirement Plan for Directors, amended and restated
|
|
|
10
|
.13.1
|
|
2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 28, 2003
|
iii
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Filed as
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Item
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Document(1)
|
|
|
(10
|
.15)
|
|
*Director Equity Plan, amended and restated (Director
Plan)
|
|
|
10
|
.15.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 11, 2008
|
|
(10
|
.15.1)
|
|
*Form of Non-Employee Director Stock Option Agreement under
Director Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.15.1
|
|
2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 11, 2004
|
|
(10
|
.16)
|
|
*Complete Restatement and Amendment of Executive Variable
Deferred Compensation Plan (EVDCP)
|
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 1995
|
|
(10
|
.16.1)
|
|
*Amendment No. 1 to EVDCP
|
|
|
10
|
.16.1
|
|
1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2000
|
|
(10
|
.17)
|
|
*Complete Restatement and Amendment of Directors Deferred
Compensation Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 1995
|
|
(10
|
.18)
|
|
*Complete Restatement and Amendment of Directors Variable
Deferred Compensation Plan (DVDCP)
|
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 1995
|
|
(10
|
.18.1)
|
|
*Amendment No. 1 to DVDCP
|
|
|
10
|
.18.1
|
|
1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2000
|
|
(10
|
.18.2)
|
|
*2005 Directors Variable Deferred Compensation Plan,
amended and restated (2005 DVDCP)
|
|
|
10
|
.18.2
|
|
First Quarterly Report for 2010 on Form 10-Q, filed May 12, 2010
|
|
(10
|
.19)
|
|
*Stock Option and Incentive Plan, amended and restated
(Stock Plan)
|
|
|
10
|
.19.8
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 11, 2008
|
|
(10
|
.19.1)
|
|
*Forms of NQSO Agreement under Stock Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.19.5
|
|
2007 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 27, 2008
|
|
(10
|
.19.2)
|
|
*Forms of Restricted Stock Agreement under Stock Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.19.8
|
|
First Quarterly Report for 2005 on Form 10-Q, filed May 12, 2005
|
|
(10
|
.19.3)
|
|
*Forms of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement under Stock Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.19.2
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 13, 2006
|
|
(10
|
.19.4)
|
|
*Forms of Equity Awards under Stock Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.19.6
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 30, 2008
|
|
(10
|
.19.5)
|
|
*Forms of Equity Awards under Stock Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.19.6
|
|
Second Quarterly Report for 2008 on Form 10-Q, filed May 8, 2008
|
|
(10
|
.19.6)
|
|
*Forms of Equity Agreements under Stock Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.19.9
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 11, 2008
|
|
(10
|
.19.7)
|
|
*Additional Forms of Equity Agreements under Stock Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.19.10
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed December 11, 2008
|
|
(10
|
.19.8)
|
|
*Form of Performance Unit Agreement
|
|
|
10
|
.19.8
|
|
2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed February 25, 2009
|
|
(10
|
.27)
|
|
*Executive Long-Term Incentive Plan, amended and restated
(LTIP)
|
|
|
10
|
.27.1
|
|
2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 11, 2004
|
|
(10
|
.28)
|
|
*Complete Restatement and Amendment of Executive Deferred
Retirement Plan (EDRP)
|
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
1994 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 1995
|
|
(10
|
.28.1)
|
|
*Amendment No. 1 to EDRP
|
|
|
10
|
.28.1
|
|
1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2000
|
iv
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Originally
|
|
|
Exhibit
|
|
|
|
Filed as
|
|
|
No.
|
|
Item
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Document(1)
|
|
|
(10
|
.28.2)
|
|
*Amendment No. 2 to EDRP
|
|
|
10
|
.28.2
|
|
2001 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 4, 2002
|
|
(10
|
.29)
|
|
*Executive Leadership Compensation Plan, (ELCP)
|
|
|
10
|
.29.1
|
|
2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 17, 2005
|
|
(10
|
.30)
|
|
*Senior Executive Leadership Compensation Plan, amended and
restated (SELCP)
|
|
|
10
|
.30.2
|
|
2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 11, 2004
|
|
(10
|
.31)
|
|
*Executive Variable Deferred Retirement Plan, amended and
restated (EVDRP)
|
|
|
10
|
.31.5
|
|
2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 11, 2004
|
|
(10
|
.31.1)
|
|
*2004 EVDRP
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-109814), filed
October 20, 2003
|
|
(10
|
.31.2)
|
|
*2005 EVDRP, amended and restated
|
|
|
10
|
.31.2
|
|
First Quarterly Report for 2010 on Form 10-Q, filed May 12, 2010
|
|
(10
|
.32)
|
|
*Benefits Restoration Plan, amended and restated
(BRP)
|
|
|
10
|
.32.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed December 11, 2008
|
|
(10
|
.33)
|
|
*Restated Trust Agreement for Employee Stock Benefit Trust
|
|
|
10
|
.33.1
|
|
1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 26, 1998
|
|
(10
|
.33.1)
|
|
*Common Stock Purchase Agreement
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed October 25, 1996
|
|
(10
|
.33.2)
|
|
*Restated Promissory Note
|
|
|
10
|
.33.3
|
|
1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 26, 1998
|
|
(10
|
.34)
|
|
*Amended and Restated Capital Accumulation Plan (CAP)
|
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2000
|
|
(10
|
.34.1)
|
|
*Trust under CAP
|
|
|
4
|
.2
|
|
Registration Statement on Form S-8 (File No. 333-38707), filed
October 24, 1997
|
|
(10
|
.34.2)
|
|
*Amendment No. 1 to CAP
|
|
|
10
|
.34.2
|
|
1999 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed March 30, 2000
|
|
(10
|
.35)
|
|
*Key Executive Change of Control Severance Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 9, 2009
|
|
(10
|
.36)
|
|
*Executive Severance Plan
|
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K, filed December 9, 2009
|
|
(23
|
.1)
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young
|
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Current Report on Form 8-K/A, filed August 29, 2007
|
|
(23
|
.2)
|
|
Consent of Ernst & Young
|
|
|
23
|
.3
|
|
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-147369), filed
November 14, 2007
|
|
(99
|
.2)
|
|
Stock Ownership Policy for Officers and Directors
|
|
|
C
|
|
|
2010 Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, filed March 19, 2010
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Unless otherwise noted, the File
Number for all documents is File
No. 1-7685.
|
|
*
|
|
Management contract or compensatory
plan or arrangement required to be filed as an Exhibit to this
Form 10-K
pursuant to Item 15.
|
v
SUBMITTED
HEREWITH:
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit No.
|
|
Item
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certification of Incorporation, as filed August 2, 2002
with the Office of Delaware Secretary of State, is incorporated
by reference to the Third Quarterly Report for 2002 on
Form 10-Q,
filed November 12, 2002
|
|
3
|
.1.1
|
|
Certificate of Amendment to Restated Certificate of
Incorporation, as filed April 23, 2010 with the Office of
Delaware Secretary of State, is incorporated by reference to the
Current Report on
Form 8-K,
filed April 27, 2010
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
By-laws, as amended and restated, is incorporated by reference
to the Current Report on Form 8-K, filed April 27, 2010
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Avery Dennison Office Products Company (ADOPC)
Credit Agreement, amended and restated, is incorporated by
reference to the Second Quarterly Report for 2008 on Form 10-Q,
filed August 7, 2008
|
|
10
|
.1.1
|
|
ADOPC Second Amendment to Credit Agreement is incorporated by
reference to the current report on Form 8-K, filed January 27,
2009
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Revolving Credit Agreement (RCA), amended and
restated, is incorporated by reference to the Third Quarterly
Report for 2007 on Form 10-Q, filed November 7, 2007
|
|
10
|
.2.1
|
|
Second Amendment to First Amended and Restated RCA is
incorporated by reference to the current report on Form 8-K,
filed January 27, 2009
|
|
10
|
.32.1
|
|
*First Amendment to Benefit Restoration Plan
|
|
12
|
|
|
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Changes
|
|
13
|
|
|
Portions of Annual Report to Shareholders for fiscal year ended
January 1, 2011
|
|
21
|
|
|
List of Subsidiaries
|
|
23
|
|
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (see
page S-4)
|
|
24
|
|
|
Power of Attorney
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
101INS
|
|
|
**XBRL Instance Document
|
|
101SCH
|
|
|
**XBRL Extension Schema Document
|
|
101CAL
|
|
|
**XBRL Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
|
|
101LAB
|
|
|
**XBRL Extension Label Linkbase Document
|
|
101PRE
|
|
|
**XBRL Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement required
to be filed as an Exhibit to this
Form 10-K
pursuant to Item 15. |
|
** |
|
Pursuant to Rule 406T of
Regulation S-T,
the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Annual
Report on
Form 10-K
shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of
Section 18 of the Exchange Act, or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section, and shall not be deemed part of a
registration statement, prospectus or other document filed under
the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except as may be
expressly set forth by specific reference in such filings. |
STATEMENT
AND AGREEMENT REGARDING
LONG-TERM DEBT OF REGISTRANT
Unless indicated above, Registrant has no instrument with
respect to long-term debt under which securities authorized
thereunder equals or exceed 10% of the total assets of
Registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis.
Registrant agrees to furnish a copy of its long-term debt
instruments to the Commission upon request.
vi