e10vk
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
|
|
|
þ
|
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934.
|
|
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31,
2010
|
or
|
o
|
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934.
|
|
|
For the transition period from
to
.
|
Commission file number:
000-26966
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES,
INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its
charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
84-0846841
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
|
1625 Sharp Point Drive, Fort Collins, CO
|
|
80525
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrants telephone number, including area code:
(970) 221-4670
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
|
|
|
Title of each class
|
|
Name of each exchange on which
registered
|
Common Stock, $0.001 par value
|
|
NASDAQ Global Select Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known
seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities
Act:
Yes o
No þ
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file
reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the
Act:
Yes o
No þ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has
filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past
90 days.
Yes þ
No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of
Regulation S-T
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such
files).
Yes o
No o
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers
pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K
is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best
of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in
Part III of this
Form 10-K
or any amendment to this
Form 10-K. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large
accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated
filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of
large accelerated filer, accelerated
filer and smaller reporting company in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated
filer o
|
|
Accelerated
filer þ
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer o
(Do not check if a smaller
reporting company)
|
|
Smaller reporting
company o
|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in
Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act).
Yes o
No þ
The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common stock
held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $401,037,485 as of
June 30, 2010, based upon the price at which such common
stock was last sold on such date. For purposes of this
disclosure, shares of common stock held by persons who hold more
than 5% of the outstanding common stock and common stock held by
executive officers and directors of the registrant have been
excluded because such persons are deemed to be
affiliates as that term is defined under the rules
and regulations promulgated under the Securities Act of 1933.
This determination is not necessarily conclusive for other
purposes.
43,450,710
(Number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of
March 1, 2011)
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Part III of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
incorporates information by reference from the registrants
definitive proxy statement for its 2011 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders, scheduled to be held on May 4, 2011. Except
as expressly incorporated by reference, the registrants
definitive proxy statement shall not be deemed to be a part of
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
FORM 10-K
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I
Unless the context otherwise requires, as used in this
Form 10-K,
references to Advanced Energy, the
Company, we, us or our
refer to Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and its consolidated
subsidiaries.
Overview
We design, manufacture, sell and support power conversion
products that transform power into various usable forms. Our
products enable manufacturing processes that use thin-film
deposition for various products, such as semiconductor devices,
flat panel displays, solar panels and architectural glass. We
also supply thermal instrumentation products for advanced
temperature control in the thin-film process for these same
markets. Our solar inverter products support renewable power
generation solutions for residential, commercial and
utility-scale solar projects and installations. Our network of
global service support centers provides a recurring revenue
opportunity as we offer repair services, conversions, upgrades
and refurbishments to companies using our products. We also
offer a wide variety of operations and maintenance service plans
that can be tailored for individual photovoltaic
(PV) sites of all sizes.
On May 3, 2010, we acquired PV Powered, Inc. (PV
Powered), a privately-held Oregon corporation based in
Bend, Oregon. PV Powered is a leading manufacturer of grid tie
PV inverters in the residential, commercial and utility-scale
markets. The combined offerings of Advanced Energy and PV
Powered provide our customers with solutions in a wider power
range and increase the number of solar array opportunities where
our products can be utilized.
On October 15, 2010, we sold our gas flow control business,
which includes the
Aera®
mass flow control and related product lines, to Hitachi Metals
Ltd. Accordingly, the results of operations from our gas flow
control business have been excluded from our discussions
relating to continuing operations.
On December 22, 2010, we announced that effective
January 1, 2011, we will operate as two focused business
units, Thin-Film Deposition Power Conversion and Thermal
Instrumentation (Thin Films) and Renewable Power
Inverters (Renewables) to enable improved execution
and a strategic focus on the distinct markets we serve.
We incorporated in Colorado in 1981 and reincorporated in
Delaware in 1995. Our executive offices are located at 1625
Sharp Point Drive, Fort Collins, Colorado 80525, and our
telephone number is
970-407-4670.
Products
and Services
Our products fall primarily into the categories of Thin Films
and Renewables. Our products are designed to enable new process
technologies, improve productivity and lower the cost of
ownership for our customers. We also provide repair and
maintenance services for all of our products.
Our products are used in diverse markets, applications and
processes, including the manufacture of capital equipment for
semiconductor devices, thin-film applications for solar panels
and architectural glass and for other thin-film applications
including flat panel displays, data storage and industrial
coatings as well as the residential, commercial and
utility-scale solar inverter markets. These markets can be
cyclical in nature. Therefore, demand for our products and our
financial results can change as demand for manufacturing
equipment, solar inverters and services change in response to
consumer demand. Other factors, such as global economic and
market conditions and technological advances in fabrication
processes and renewable applications can also have an impact on
our financial results, both positively and negatively.
THIN-FILM
DEPOSITION POWER CONVERSION AND THERMAL
INSTRUMENTATION
Our thin-film deposition power conversion systems include direct
current (DC), pulsed DC mid frequency, and radio
frequency (RF) power supplies, matching networks and
RF instrumentation. These power conversion systems refine,
modify and control the raw electrical power from a utility and
convert it into
3
power that may be customized and is predictable and repeatable.
Our power conversion systems are primarily used by
semiconductor, solar panel and similar thin-film manufacturers
including flat panel display, data storage and architectural
glass manufacturers.
Our thermal instrumentation products, used in the semiconductor
industry as well as solar panels and LED industries, provide
temperature measurement solutions for applications in which
time-temperature cycles affect material properties, productivity
and yield. These products are used in rapid thermal processing,
chemical vapor deposition, and other semiconductor and solar
applications requiring non-contact temperature measurement.
SOLAR
INVERTERS
Our renewable power inverters offer a transformer-based or
transformerless advanced grid-tie PV solution for residential,
commercial and utility-scale system installations. Our PV
inverters are designed to convert renewable solar power, drawn
from large and small scale solar arrays, into high-quality,
reliable electrical power. We also offer integrated monitoring
and performance measurement to minimize the cost of energy and
enhance the value and reliability of PV installations.
GLOBAL
SUPPORT SERVICES
Our global support services group offers in-warranty and
out-of-warranty
repair services in the regions in which we operate, providing us
with preventive maintenance opportunities. As semiconductor
device manufacturers have become increasingly sensitive to the
significant costs of system downtime, they have required that
suppliers offer comprehensive local repair service and customer
support. To meet these market requirements, we maintain a
worldwide support organization in the United States, the
Peoples Republic of China (PRC), Japan, Korea,
Taiwan, Germany and England.
Markets
Our products compete in markets for high tech manufacturing
capital equipment and renewable energy production. The inverter
market has lower volume sales during the winter months due to
reduced ability to install products. Our other markets are not
subject to seasonality; however, these markets are cyclical due
to sudden changes in customers manufacturing capacity
requirements and spending, which depend in part on capacity
utilization, demand for customers products, inventory
levels relative to demand, government incentives and subsidies
and access to affordable capital.
SEMICONDUCTOR
CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
Customers in the semiconductor capital equipment market
incorporate our products into equipment that make integrated
circuits. Our power conversion systems provide the energy to
enable thin-film processes such as deposition and etch. Our
thermal instrumentation products measure the temperature of the
process chamber. Precise control over the energy delivered to
plasma-based processes enables the production of integrated
circuits with reduced feature sizes and increased speed and
performance.
SOLAR
INVERTERS
We sell residential, commercial and utility-grade solar
inverters to distributors, contractors, developers and utility
companies who integrate our inverter products into solar array
installations. Our solar inverters convert DC power, which is
produced by the solar panels in the array, into alternating
current (AC) power for consumption
on-site or
to be sold back through the public utility grid. Our commercial
and utility-grade inverters have power outputs from 30 kilowatts
(kW) to 2 megawatts and can be used in small-scale
and utility-scale solar array installations. Our
residential-grade inverters have power outputs from 1kW to 5 kW
and are designed for residential installations.
4
SOLAR
PANEL CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
We sell our products to OEMs and manufacturers of solar cells
who use our products to produce thin-films using silicon
substrates as well as glass or metal substrates. The majority of
solar cell manufacturing currently uses a silicon wafer as the
substrate and employs chemical vapor deposition
(CVD) thin-film processing. The solar cell industry
also has developed processes for manufacturing solar cells on
non-silicon substrates, such as glass and metal, using thin-film
processes that also employ CVD tools. Our RF and DC power supply
products are designed for use in these CVD and physical vapor
deposition (PVD) tools. Our products are used in
leading thin-film solar cell technologies, including amorphous
and microcrystalline silicon, copper, indium, gallium, selenide
and cadmium telluride.
FLAT
PANEL DISPLAY CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
We sell our products to OEMs and manufacturers of flat panel
displays, which use thin-film deposition processes similar to
those employed in manufacturing semiconductor integrated
circuits. Flat panel display technology produces bright, sharp,
large, color-rich images on flat screens for products ranging
from hand-held devices to laptop and desktop computer monitors,
liquid crystal display, light emitting diode (LED)
backlit and
3-dimensional
(3D) television screens. The transition to larger
panel sizes and higher display resolution is driving the need
for tighter process controls to reduce manufacturing costs and
defects.
DATA
STORAGE CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
We sell products to OEMs and manufacturers of data storage
equipment for use in producing a variety of products, including
optical disks, such as CDs, DVDs and Blu-ray; and magnetic
storage, such as computer hard discs, including both magnetic
media and thin-film heads. These products use a PVD process to
produce optical and magnetic thin-film layers as well as a
protective-wear layer. In this market, the trend towards higher
recording densities requires thinner and more precise films. The
use of equipment incorporating optical and magnetic media to
store digital data expands with the growth of the laptop,
desktop and network server computer markets and the consumer
electronics audio, video, gaming, cell phone and entertainment
markets.
ARCHITECTURAL
GLASS CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
We sell our products to OEMs and to producers of Low Emissivity
or Low-E architectural glass. This glass is used in commercial
and residential buildings to reflect heat and cold through the
use of thin films coated directly on the glass which reduces the
energy used in the building. The thin-film deposition process
employs PVD tools which use our DC and mid-frequency power
products. This market is driven by end market demand for glass
related to the residential and commercial construction industry.
INDUSTRIAL
PRODUCTS CAPITAL EQUIPMENT
We sell our products to OEMs and to manufacturers who use
thin-film deposition processes to produce products for a variety
of industrial markets. Thin films are applied to products in
plasma-based processes to strengthen and harden surfaces on such
diverse products as tools, automotive parts and various other
end products. The advanced thin-film production processes allow
precise control of various optical and physical properties,
including color, transparency and electrical and thermal
conductivity. The improved adhesion and high-film quality
resulting from plasma-based processing make it the preferred
method of applying the thin films.
Customers
Our products are sold worldwide to approximately 400 OEMs and
integrators and directly to more than 1,000 end users. Our ten
largest customers accounted for approximately 49% of our sales
in 2010, 52% of our sales in 2009 and 52% of our sales in 2008.
We expect that the sale of products to our largest customers
will continue to account for a significant percentage of our
sales for the foreseeable future.
5
Applied Materials Inc., our largest customer, accounted for 19%
of our sales in 2010, 21% of our sales in 2009 and 22% of our
sales in 2008. No other customer accounted for greater than 10%
of our sales in 2010, 2009 or 2008.
Backlog
Our backlog was approximately $93.1 million at
December 31, 2010, a 57.7% increase from $59.0 million
at December 31, 2009. This increase was the result of sharp
growth in demand for our products, particularly from the
semiconductor capital equipment and solar inverter markets
throughout 2010 and the addition of PV Powered to our sales mix.
Backlog orders are firm orders scheduled to be filled and
shipped in the next 12 months and include our
just-in-time
supply agreements with major OEMs.
Backlog orders are not necessarily an indicator of future sales
levels because of variations in lead times and customer
production demand pull systems. Customers may delay delivery of
products or cancel orders prior to shipment, subject to possible
cancellation penalties. Delays in delivery schedules
and/or
customer changes to backlog orders during any particular period
could cause a decrease in sales and have a material adverse
effect on our business and results of operations.
Marketing,
Sales and Distribution
We sell our products primarily through direct sales personnel to
customers in North America, Europe and Asia. Our sales personnel
are located in the United States, Canada, the PRC, England,
Germany, Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. In addition to our
direct sales force, we also have sales representatives and
distributors globally that support our selling efforts. We
maintain customer service offices at many of the locations
listed above, as well as other sites near our customers
locations. We believe that customer service and technical
support are important competitive factors and are essential to
building and maintaining close, long-term relationships with our
customers.
The following table presents our net sales by geographic region
for the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008. Net
sales are attributed to individual countries based on location
of our sales office.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Sales to external
customers:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
270,606
|
|
|
$
|
71,439
|
|
|
$
|
122,474
|
|
Peoples Republic of China
|
|
|
48,024
|
|
|
|
11,372
|
|
|
|
19,646
|
|
Other Asian countries
|
|
|
88,872
|
|
|
|
55,081
|
|
|
|
94,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
136,896
|
|
|
|
66,453
|
|
|
|
114,580
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
47,339
|
|
|
|
19,949
|
|
|
|
42,657
|
|
Other European Countries
|
|
|
4,573
|
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
|
|
5,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
51,912
|
|
|
|
23,954
|
|
|
|
48,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
$
|
459,414
|
|
|
$
|
161,846
|
|
|
$
|
285,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See Risk Factors in Item 1A for a discussion of
certain risks related to our foreign operations.
Manufacturing
Our thin-film deposition manufacturing is performed in Shenzhen,
PRC and Seoul, South Korea, and our thermal instrumentation
products are manufactured in Vancouver, Washington. Our solar
inverters are produced primarily in Fort Collins, Colorado
and Bend, Oregon; however, we also have relationships with
contract manufacturers in Canada and the PRC for the outsourced
production of solar inverters to manage flexible capacity during
periods of high demand.
6
On October 15, 2010, we sold our gas flow control business
to Hitachi Metals Ltd. and exited the gas flow control business.
In connection with this transaction, we entered into a Master
Services Agreement and a Supplemental Transition Services
Agreement pursuant to which we agreed to provide contract
manufacturing services of gas flow control products and other
transition services for 12 to 18 months.
Manufacturing requires raw materials, including a wide variety
of mechanical and electrical components, to be manufactured to
our specifications. We use numerous companies, including
contract manufacturers, to supply parts for the manufacture and
support of our products. Although we make reasonable efforts to
assure that parts are available from multiple qualified
suppliers, this is not always possible. Accordingly, some key
parts may be obtained from a sole supplier or a limited group of
suppliers. We seek to reduce costs and to lower the risks of
production and service interruptions, as well as shortages of
key parts, by:
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
selecting and qualifying alternate suppliers for key parts using
rigorous technical and commercial evaluation of suppliers
products and business processes including testing its components
performance, quality and reliability on our power conversion
product at our customers and their customers processes. The
qualification process follows industry standard practices such
as copy exactly used in the Semiconductor industry;
|
|
|
(2)
|
monitoring the financial condition of key suppliers;
|
|
|
(3)
|
maintaining appropriate inventories of key parts;
|
|
|
(4)
|
qualifying new parts on a timely basis; and
|
|
|
(5)
|
locating certain manufacturing operations in areas that are
closer to suppliers and customers.
|
Intellectual
Property
We seek patent protection for inventions governing new products
or technologies as part of our ongoing research and development.
We currently hold 89 United States patents and 40 foreign-issued
patents, and have over 166 patent applications pending in the
United States, Europe and Asia. Generally, our efforts to obtain
international patents have been concentrated in the
industrialized countries within Europe and Asia, because there
are other manufacturers and developers of power conversion and
control systems in those countries as well as customers for
those systems.
During fiscal 2010, we acquired PV Powered and all related
intellectual property including 8 United States patents. In
addition, PV Powered has 13 patent applications pending in the
United States and 9 patent applications in foreign
jurisdictions. During 2010, we sold intellectual property
related to our gas flow control business to Hitachi Metals Ltd.
This included 15 United States patents, 14 patent applications
in the United States and 30 patent applications in foreign
jurisdictions.
During fiscal 2010, we were granted patents related to the
following:
|
|
|
|
|
Measurement, control, and protection means for Thin Film power
conversion systems, and
|
|
|
|
Anti-islanding methods, ground fault detection and inverter
architectures for solar inverter systems.
|
As part of our ongoing effort to improve the efficiency within
our business, on December 31, 2009, we transferred the
economic rights to our patents and know-how between affiliates
throughout the world, including the parent company, streamlined
our intercompany agreements between company affiliates and
restructured our order processing transaction flow. We
subsequently reconfigured our legal entity structure to realign
our Chinese manufacturing operations with the intellectual
property utilized in such manufacturing. This realignment was
accomplished through various license agreements and did not
involve any assignment of patents. Accordingly, our patents
remain registered in countries with more developed intellectual
property laws than those of the PRC. The result of this
structure has been to improve efficiency, streamline processes
and properly align intellectual property (and the related
expenses) with the manufacturing operations undertaken in the
PRC. In addition, we believe we will see worldwide tax savings
related to the new structure over time.
7
Litigation may from time to time be necessary to enforce patents
issued to us, to protect trade secrets or know-how owned by us,
to defend us against claimed infringement of the rights of
others or to determine the scope and validity of the proprietary
rights of others. See Risk Factors We are
highly dependent on our intellectual property in
Item 1A.
Competition
The markets we serve are highly competitive and characterized by
rapid technological development and changing customer
requirements. No single company dominates any of our markets.
Significant competitive factors in our markets include product
performance, compatibility with adjacent products, price,
quality, reliability and level of customer service and support.
We have seen an increase in global competition in the markets in
which we compete, especially from Asian and European-based
component suppliers. We encounter substantial competition from
foreign and domestic companies for each of our product lines.
Some of our competitors have greater financial and other
resources than us. In some cases, competitors are smaller than
we are, but well established in specific product niches. MKS
Instruments, Inc., Comdel, Inc., Daihen Corporation, Kyosan
Electric Mfg. Co., Ltd., Hüttinger Elektronik GmbH, Comet
Holding AG and Entech, Plasmart compete with our power
conversion products for thin film processing. SMA Solar
Technology AG, SatCon Technology Corporation, Power-One, Inc.,
Schneider Electric SA and Siemens AG offer products that compete
with our solar inverters. Lumasense Technologies, CI Systems,
BASF and Laytec GMBH offer products that compete with our
thermal products.
A focus on local content is causing new competitors to emerging
in Asia with strong support from local governments, industry
leaders and investors.
Our ability to continue to compete successfully in these markets
depends on our ability to make timely introductions of product
enhancements and new products, to localize these development and
production activities in key world regions and to produce
quality products. We expect our competitors will continue to
improve the design and performance of their products and
introduce new products with competitive performance
characteristics. We believe that we currently compete
effectively with respect to these factors, although we cannot
assure that we will be able to compete effectively in the future.
Research
and Development
The market for our thin film power conversion and thermal
measurement products is characterized by ongoing technological
changes. We believe that continued and timely development of new
highly differentiated products and enhancements to existing
products to support OEM requirements is necessary for us to
maintain a competitive position in the markets we serve.
Accordingly, we continue to devote a significant portion of our
personnel and financial resources to research and development
projects and seek to maintain close relationships with our
customers and other industry leaders in order to remain
responsive to their product requirements now and in the future.
Our development focus in renewable equipment continues to
address residential, commercial and utility-scale solar projects
and installations. Our designs are engineered for reliability,
efficiency and levelized cost of energy (LCOE)
performance in the worldwide markets we serve. We continually
invest in research and development projects in order to rapidly
deliver better emerging technologies and solutions to the market
in support of our customers demands for maximum
performance, reliability and functionality, combined with the
lowest LCOE.
Research and development expenses were $56.6 million in
2010, $41.1 million in 2009 and $52.1 million in 2008,
representing 12.3% of our sales in 2010, 25.4% of our sales in
2009 and 18.3% of our sales in 2008.
Employees
As of December 31, 2010, we had a total of
1,788 employees. There is no union representation of our
employees, notwithstanding statutory organization rights
applicable to our employees in the PRC, and we have
8
never experienced an involuntary work stoppage. We believe that
our continued success depends, in part, on our ability to
attract and retain qualified personnel. We consider our
relations with our employees to be good.
Effect of
Environmental Laws
We are subject to federal, state and local environmental laws
and regulations, as well as the environmental laws and
regulations of the foreign federal and local jurisdictions in
which we have manufacturing facilities. We believe we are in
material compliance with all such laws and regulations.
Compliance with federal, state and local laws and regulations
has not had, and is not expected to have, an adverse effect on
our capital expenditures, competitive position, financial
condition or results of operations.
Website
Access
Our website address is www.advancedenergy.com. We make
available, free of charge on our website, our Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
quarterly reports on
Form 10-Q,
current reports on
Form 8-K
and all amendments to these reports as soon as reasonably
practicable after filing such reports with, or furnishing them
to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
Such reports are also available at www.sec.gov.
Information contained on our website is not incorporated by
reference in, or otherwise part of, this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
or any of our other filings with the SEC.
Special
Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on
Form 10-K
includes or incorporates by reference forward-looking
statements within the meanings of Section 27A of the
Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All statements
contained or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
other than statements of historical fact, are
forward-looking statements. For example, statements
relating to our beliefs, expectations, plans, projections,
forecasts and estimates are forward-looking statements as are
statements that specified actions, conditions or circumstances
will continue or change. Forward-looking statements involve
risks and uncertainties. In some cases, forward-looking
statements can be identified by the inclusion of words such as
believe, expect, plan,
anticipate, estimate, may,
should, will, continue,
intend and similar words.
Some of the forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
are, or reflect, our expectations or projections relating to:
|
|
|
|
|
our future revenues;
|
|
|
|
our future sales, including backlog orders;
|
|
|
|
our future gross profit;
|
|
|
|
reducing our operating breakeven point;
|
|
|
|
market acceptance of our products;
|
|
|
|
the fair value of our assets and financial instruments;
|
|
|
|
research and development expenses;
|
|
|
|
selling, general and administrative expenses;
|
|
|
|
sufficiency and availability of capital resources;
|
|
|
|
capital expenditures;
|
|
|
|
adequacy of our reserve for excess and obsolete inventory;
|
|
|
|
adequacy of our warranty reserves;
|
|
|
|
restructuring activities and expenses;
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
general global economic conditions; and
|
|
|
|
industry trends.
|
Our actual results could differ materially from those projected
or assumed in our forward-looking statements, because
forward-looking statements by their nature are subject to risks
and uncertainties. Factors that could contribute to these
differences or prove our forward-looking statements, by
hindsight, to be overly optimistic or unachievable include the
factors described in Risk Factors in Item 1A.
Other factors might also contribute to the differences between
our forward-looking statements and our actual results. We assume
no obligation to update any forward-looking statement or the
reasons why our actual results might differ.
Executive
Officers of the Registrant
Our executive officers, their positions and their ages as of
December 31, 2010 are as follows:
Dr. Hans-Georg Betz, 64, has been our Chief Executive
Officer since August 2005 and has been a member of our Board of
Directors since July 2004. Between August 2005 and December
2009, Mr. Betz also served as our President. From August
2001 until he became our Chief Executive Officer and President,
Dr. Betz served as chief executive officer of West Steag
Partners GmbH, a German-based venture capital company focused on
the high-technology industry. In his over
30-year
career in the electronics industry, Dr. Betz also has
served as chief executive officer of STEAG Electronic Systems AG
and a managing director at Leybold AG. Dr. Betz currently
serves as a director of Mattson Technology, Inc., a publicly
held supplier of advanced process equipment used to manufacture
semiconductors, and serves as a member of its compensation
committee.
Yuval Wasserman, 56, has been our President and Chief Operating
Officer since January 2010. Mr. Wasserman served as
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from April
2009 to January 2010. He joined Advanced Energy in August 2007
as Senior Vice President, Sales, Marketing and Services. In
October 2007, he was promoted to executive Vice President,
Sales, Marketing and Service. Immediately prior to joining
Advanced Energy, from May 2002 to August 2007,
Mr. Wasserman served as the president and chief executive
officer of Tevet Process Control Technologies, Inc.. Prior to
that, he held senior executive and general management positions
at Boxer Cross (a metrology company acquired by Applied
Materials, Inc.), Fusion Systems (a plasma strip company that is
a division of Axcelis Technologies, Inc.), and AG Associates (a
semiconductor capital equipment company focused on rapid thermal
processing). Mr. Wasserman started his career at National
Semiconductor, where he held various process engineering and
management positions. Mr. Wasserman joined the board of
Syncroness, Inc., an outsourced engineering and product
development company, in 2010.
Danny C. Herron, 56, was appointed Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer in September 2010. Prior to joining
Advanced Energy, he was chief financial officer of Sundrop
Fuels, Inc., a solar gasification-based renewable fuels company,
from October 2009 through August 2010. From May 2009 through
October 2009, Mr. Herron was a consultant at Tatum LLC, a
financial consulting business, providing interim chief financial
officer and financial consulting services. Mr. Herron
served VeraSun Energy Corporation, a corn-based ethanol company,
from 2006 through 2008 first as senior vice president and chief
financial officer and later as president and chief financial
officer. From 2002 through 2006, Mr. Herron was executive
vice president and chief financial officer at Swift &
Company, a beef and pork producer acquired from ConAgra Foods,
Inc. Prior to that, Mr. Herron served as division chief
financial officer of ConAgra Foods, Inc. Beef Division.
ITEM 1A. RISK
FACTORS
An investment in our common stock involves a number of very
significant risks. You should carefully consider the risks
described below and the other information in this Annual Report
before deciding whether to purchase our shares of common stock.
10
Our business, financial condition, results of operations and
cash flow, could be materially adversely affected by any of
these risks. The value of our shares of common stock could
decline due to any of these risks, and you may lose all or part
of your investment.
This Annual Report also contains forward-looking statements that
involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ
materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking
statements as a result of certain factors, including the risks
faced by us described below.
Raw
material, part, component and subassembly shortages, exacerbated
by our dependence on sole and limited source suppliers, could
affect our ability to manufacture products and systems and could
delay our shipments.
Our business depends on our ability to manufacture products that
meet the rapidly changing demands of our customers. Our ability
to manufacture our products timely depends in part on the timely
delivery of raw materials, parts, components and subassemblies
from suppliers. We rely on sole and limited source suppliers for
some of our raw materials, parts, components and subassemblies
that are critical to the manufacturing of our products. This
reliance involves several risks, including the following:
|
|
|
|
|
the inability to obtain an adequate supply of required parts,
components or subassemblies;
|
|
|
|
supply shortages, if a sole or limited source provider ceases
operations;
|
|
|
|
the need to fund the operating losses of a sole or limited
source provider;
|
|
|
|
reduced control over pricing and timing of delivery of raw
materials and parts, components or subassemblies;
|
|
|
|
the need to qualify alternative suppliers; and
|
|
|
|
the inability of our suppliers to develop technologically
advanced products to support our growth and development of new
products.
|
Qualifying alternative suppliers could be time consuming and
lead to delays in, or prevention of delivery of products to our
customers, as well as increased costs. If we are unable to
qualify additional suppliers and manage relationships with our
existing and future suppliers successfully, if our suppliers
experience financial difficulties including bankruptcy or if our
suppliers cannot meet our performance or quality specifications
or timing requirements, we may experience shortages, delays or
increased costs of raw materials, parts, components or
subassemblies. This in turn could limit or prevent our ability
to manufacture and ship our products, which could materially and
adversely affect our relationships with our current and
prospective customers and our business, financial condition and
results of operations. From time to time, our sole or limited
source suppliers have given us notice that they are ending
supply of critical parts, components and subassemblies that are
required for us to deliver product. In those cases, we have been
required to make last time buys of such supplies in advance of
product demand from our customers. If we cannot qualify
alternative suppliers before these
end-of-life
supplies are utilized in our products, we may be unable to
deliver further product to our customers. To mitigate the risk
of not having a supply of critical parts, components and
subassemblies for our products, we proactively make additional
purchases which we believe addresses such risk.
Our
orders of raw materials, parts, components and subassemblies are
based on demand forecasts.
We place orders with many of our suppliers based on our
customers quarterly forecasts and our annual forecasts.
These forecasts are based on our customers and our
expectations as to demand for our products. As the quarter and
the year progress, such demand can change rapidly or we may
realize that our customers expectations were overly
optimistic or pessimistic, especially when industry or general
economic conditions change. Orders with our suppliers cannot
always be amended in response. In addition, in order to assure
availability of certain components or to obtain priority
pricing, we have entered into contracts with some of our
suppliers that require us to purchase a specified amount of
components and subassemblies each quarter, even if we are not
able to use such components or subassemblies. Moreover, we have
obligations to
11
some of our customers to hold a minimum amount of finished goods
in inventory, in order to fulfill just in time orders,
regardless of whether the customers expect to place such orders.
We currently have firm purchase commitments and agreements with
various suppliers to ensure the availability of components. Our
obligation to our suppliers at December 31, 2010 under
these purchase commitments and agreements was
$63.5 million. If demand for our products does not continue
at current levels, we might not be able to use all of the
components that we are required to purchase under these
commitments and agreements, and our reserves for excess and
obsolete inventory may increase, which could have a material
adverse effect on our results of operations. If demand for our
products exceeds our customers and our forecasts, we may
not be able to timely obtain sufficient raw materials, parts,
components or subassemblies, on favorable terms or at all, to
fulfill the excess demand.
We
generally have no long-term contracts with our customers
requiring them to purchase any specified quantities from
us.
Our sales are primarily made on a purchase order basis, and we
generally have no long-term purchase commitments from our
customers, which is typical in the industries we serve. As a
result, we are limited in our ability to predict the level of
future sales or commitments from our current customers, which
may diminish our ability to allocate labor, materials and
equipment in the manufacturing process effectively. In addition,
we may accumulate inventory in anticipation of sales that do not
materialize, resulting in excess and obsolete inventory
write-offs.
We are
exposed to risks associated with worldwide financial markets and
the global economy.
Our business depends on the expansion of manufacturing capacity
in our end markets and the installation base for the products we
sell. In the past, severe tightening of credit markets, turmoil
in the financial markets and a weakening global economy have
contributed to slowdowns in the industries in which we operate.
Our markets depend largely on consumer spending. Economic
uncertainty exacerbates negative trends in consumer spending and
may cause our customers to push out, cancel or refrain from
placing equipment orders.
Difficulties in obtaining capital and uncertain market
conditions may also lead to a reduction of our sales and greater
instances of nonpayment. These conditions may similarly affect
our key suppliers, which could affect their ability to deliver
parts and result in delays for our products. Further, these
conditions and uncertainty about future economic conditions
could make it challenging for us to forecast our operating
results and evaluate the risks that may affect our business,
financial condition and results of operations. As discussed in
Our orders of raw materials, parts, components and
subassemblies are based on demand forecasts, a
significant percentage of our expenses are relatively fixed and
based in part on expectations of future net sales. If a sudden
decrease in demand for our products from one or more customers
were to occur, the inability to adjust spending quickly enough
to compensate for any shortfall would magnify the adverse impact
of a shortfall in net sales on our results of operations.
Conversely, if market conditions were to unexpectedly recover
and demand for our products were to increase suddenly, we might
not be able to respond quickly enough, which could have a
negative impact on our results of operations and customer
relations.
The
industries in which we compete are subject to volatile and
unpredictable cycles.
As a supplier to the global semiconductor, flat panel display,
solar and related industries, we are subject to business cycles,
the timing, length and volatility of which can be difficult to
predict. These industries historically have been cyclical due to
sudden changes in customers manufacturing capacity
requirements and spending, which depend in part on capacity
utilization, demand for customers products, inventory
levels relative to demand and access to affordable capital.
These changes have affected the timing and amounts of
customers purchases and investments in technology, and
continue to affect our orders, net sales, operating expenses and
net income. In addition, we may not be able to respond
adequately or quickly to the declines in demand by reducing our
costs. We may be required to record significant reserves for
excess and obsolete inventory as demand for our products changes.
12
To meet rapidly changing demand in each of the industries we
serve, we must effectively manage our resources and production
capacity. During periods of decreasing demand for our products,
we must be able to appropriately align our cost structure with
prevailing market conditions; effectively manage our supply
chain; and motivate and retain key employees. During periods of
increasing demand, we must have sufficient manufacturing
capacity and inventory to meet customer demand; effectively
manage our supply chain; and attract, retain and motivate a
sufficient number of qualified individuals. If we are not able
to timely and appropriately adapt to changes in our business
environment or to accurately assess where we are positioned
within a business cycle, our business, financial condition or
results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
Cyclicality
in the semiconductor equipment industry impacts our results of
operations.
Our business is affected by the capital equipment expenditures
of semiconductor manufacturers, which in turn is affected by the
current and anticipated market demand for integrated circuits
and products using integrated circuits. The semiconductor
industry is cyclical in nature and has experienced periodic and
severe downturns and upturns. Business conditions, therefore,
historically have changed rapidly and unpredictably.
Fluctuating levels of investment by semiconductor manufacturers
could continue to materially affect our revenues and operating
results. Where appropriate, we will attempt to respond to these
fluctuations with cost management programs aimed at aligning our
expenditures with anticipated revenue streams, which sometimes
result in restructuring charges. Even during periods of reduced
revenues, we must continue to invest in research and development
and maintain extensive ongoing worldwide customer service and
support capabilities to remain competitive, which may have a
temporary adverse effect on our results of operations. During
periods of increased demand, we may have difficulty obtaining
sufficient components and subassemblies or increasing production
quickly enough to meet our customers requirements.
We are
exposed to risks as a result of ongoing changes specific to the
solar inverter industry.
A significant portion of our business is in the emerging solar
inverter market, which, in addition to the general industry
changes described above in the risk factor The
industries in which we compete are subject to volatile and
unpredictable cycles, is also characterized by
ongoing changes particular to the solar inverter industry. Our
business is subject to changes in technology or demand for solar
products arising from, among other things, adoption of our
inverter products by our customers, compatibility of our solar
inverter technology with our customers products or certain
solar panel providers, customers and end-users
access to affordable financial capital, the cost and performance
of solar technology compared to other energy sources, the
adequacy of or changes in government energy policies, including
the availability and amount of government incentives for solar
power, the continuation of renewable portfolio standards and the
extent of investment or participation in solar by utilities or
other companies that generate, transmit or distribute power to
end users. There is also increased market volatility as the size
of utility scale solar projects is increasing to hundreds of
megawatts of capacity. Such large scale solar projects require
significant financial resources on our part should we be
selected as the supplier for solar inverters. We are beginning
to see requirements in the solar industry for performance
guarantees related to solar inverters and associated liquidated
damages provisions. This could result in financial exposure for
our business if our solar inverters do not meet reliability or
uptime requirements. Lastly, customers using our solar inverters
are beginning to evaluate multi-year service agreements from us
for onsite maintenance and support of our inverters and even the
solar site. These agreements, however, are subject to annual
renewal and may not be renewed by the customers.
If we do not successfully manage the risks resulting from these
ongoing changes occurring in the solar industry, we may miss out
on substantial opportunities for revenue and our business,
financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
13
Businesses,
consumers and utilities might not adopt alternative energy
solutions as a means for providing or obtaining their
electricity and power needs.
On-site
distributed power generation solutions, such as PV systems,
which utilize our inverter products, provide an alternative
means for obtaining electricity and are relatively new methods
of obtaining electrical power that businesses, consumers and
utilities may not adopt at levels sufficient to grow this part
of our business. Traditional electricity distribution is based
on the regulated industry model whereby businesses and consumers
obtain their electricity from a government regulated utility.
For alternative methods of distributed power to succeed,
businesses, consumers and utilities must adopt new purchasing
practices and must be willing to rely upon less traditional
means of providing and purchasing electricity. As larger solar
projects come online, utilities are becoming increasingly
concerned with grid stability, power management and the
predictable loading of such power onto the grid.
We cannot be certain that businesses, consumers and utilities
will choose to utilize
on-site
distributed power at levels sufficient to sustain our business
in this area. The development of a mass market for our products
may be impacted by many factors which are out of our control,
including:
|
|
|
|
|
market acceptance of PV systems that incorporate our solar
inverter products;
|
|
|
|
the cost competitiveness of these systems;
|
|
|
|
regulatory requirements; and
|
|
|
|
the emergence of newer, more competitive technologies and
products.
|
If a mass market fails to develop or develops more slowly than
we anticipate, we may be unable to recover the costs we will
have incurred to develop these products.
We
might make substantial capital expenditures and commitments to
meet anticipated demand for our solar inverters.
We have invested and will continue to invest significant human
and financial resources in the development, marketing and sale
of our solar inverters. To increase our manufacturing capacity
for our solar inverters in order to meet anticipated demand, we
have purchased equipment, leased new facilities and made other
capital expenditures and commitments. Commitments for capital
expenditures to support our solar inverters totaled
$0.6 million at December 31, 2010. These additional
expenditures and commitments have increased, and may continue to
increase, our overhead expenses during a time when our
operations are not fully absorbing current overhead expenses.
The impact could lower gross margins until such time that
revenue related to sale of our solar inverters can fully absorb
overhead expenses. As mentioned above, we have experienced a
shortage of components for our solar inverters that could affect
our ability to manufacture products and systems. We and other
participants in the industry have seen shortages of insulated
gate bipolar transistors, capacitors, switchgear and other
discrete electrical components. To mitigate the risk of not
having such critical parts, we pro-actively make additional
purchases which we believe addresses such risk.
A
significant portion of our sales and accounts receivable are
concentrated among a few customers.
Our ten largest customers accounted for 48.8% of our sales in
2010, 51.6% of our sales in 2009, and 52.1% of our sales in
2008. Applied Materials Inc., our largest customer, accounted
for 18.8% of our sales in 2010, 21.4% of our sales in 2009, and
21.8% of our sales in 2008. No other single customer accounted
for more than 10% of our sales during 2010, 2009 or 2008. At
December 31, 2010 our accounts receivable from ULVAC, Inc.
comprised 10.5% of our total accounts receivable. At
December 31, 2009 our accounts receivable from Applied
Materials, Inc. represented 15.6% of our total accounts
receivable. No other single customer accounted for more than 10%
of our accounts receivable as of December 31, 2010 or 2009.
If we were to lose any of our significant customers or suffer a
material reduction in their purchase orders, revenue could
decline and our business, financial condition and results of
operations could be materially and adversely affected.
14
Market
pressures may reduce or eliminate our
profitability.
Our customers continually exert pressure on us to reduce our
prices and extend payment terms. Given the nature of our
customer base and the highly competitive markets in which we
compete, we may be required to reduce our prices or extend
payment terms to remain competitive. We may not be able to
reduce our expenses in an amount sufficient to offset potential
margin declines. The decrease in cash flow could adversely
impact our financial condition.
If we
are unable to adjust our business strategy successfully for some
of our product lines to reflect the increasing price sensitivity
on the part of our customers, our business and financial
condition could be harmed.
Our business strategy for many of our product lines has been
focused on product performance and technology innovation to
provide enhanced efficiencies and productivity. As a result of
recent economic conditions and changes in various markets that
we serve, our customers have experienced significant cost
pressures. We have observed increased price sensitivity on the
part of our customers. If competition against any of our product
lines should come to focus solely on price rather than on
product performance and technology innovation, we will need to
adjust our business strategy and product offerings accordingly
and, if we are unable to do so, our business, financial
condition and results of operations could be materially and
adversely affected.
The
markets in which we operate are highly
competitive.
We face substantial competition, primarily from established
companies, some of which have greater financial, marketing and
technical resources than we do. We expect our competitors will
continue to develop new products in direct competition with
ours, improve the design and performance of their products and
introduce new products with enhanced performance characteristics.
To remain competitive, we must improve and expand our products
and product offerings. In addition, we may need to maintain a
high level of investment in research and development and expand
our sales and marketing efforts, particularly outside of the
United States. We might not be able to make the technological
advances and investments necessary to remain competitive. If we
were unable to improve and expand our products and product
offerings, our business, financial condition and results of
operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Our
competitive position could be weakened if we are unable to
convince end users to specify that our products be used in the
equipment sold by our customers.
The end users in our markets may direct equipment manufacturers
to use a specified suppliers product in their equipment at
a particular facility. This occurs with frequency because our
products are critical in manufacturing process control for
thin-film applications. Our success therefore, depends in part
on our ability to have end users specify that our products be
used at their facilities. In addition, we may encounter
difficulties in changing established relationships of
competitors that already have a large installed base of products
within such facilities.
We
must achieve design wins to retain our existing customers and to
obtain new customers, although design wins achieved do not
necessarily result in substantial sales.
The constantly changing nature of technology in the markets we
serve causes equipment manufacturers to continually design new
systems. We must work with these manufacturers early in their
design cycles to modify our equipment or design new equipment to
meet the requirements of their new systems. Manufacturers
typically choose one or two vendors to provide the components
for use with the early system shipments. Selection as one of
these vendors is called a design win. It is critical that we
achieve these design wins in order to retain existing customers
and to obtain new customers.
15
We believe that equipment manufacturers often select their
suppliers based on factors including long-term relationships and
end user demand. Accordingly, we may have difficulty achieving
design wins from equipment manufacturers who are not currently
our customers. In addition, we must compete for design wins for
new systems and products of our existing customers, including
those with whom we have had long-term relationships. Our efforts
to achieve design wins are time consuming and expensive, and may
not be successful. If we are not successful in achieving design
wins, or if we do achieve design wins but our customers
systems that utilize our products are not successful, our
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely impacted.
Once a manufacturer chooses a component for use in a particular
product, it is likely to retain that component for the life of
that product. Our sales and growth could experience material and
prolonged adverse effects if we fail to achieve design wins.
However, design wins do not always result in substantial sales,
as sales of our products are dependent upon our customers
sales of their products.
Our
products may suffer from defects or errors leading to damage or
warranty claims.
Our products use complex system designs and components that may
contain errors or defects, particularly when we incorporate new
technology into our products or release new versions. If any of
our products are defective, we might be required to redesign or
recall those products or pay damages or warranty claims and
suffer significant harm to our reputation. We accrue a warranty
reserve for estimated costs to provide warranty services,
including the cost of technical support, product repairs, and
product replacement for units that cannot be repaired. Our
estimate of costs to fulfill our warranty obligations is based
on historical experience and expectation of future conditions.
To the extent we experience increased warranty claim activity or
increased costs associated with servicing those claims, our
warranty accrual will increase, resulting in decreased gross
profit.
We
conduct manufacturing at only a few sites and our sites are not
generally interchangeable.
Our power products for the semiconductor industry are
manufactured in Shenzhen, PRC. Our thermal instrumentation
products that are used in the semiconductor industry are
manufactured in Vancouver, Washington. Each facility
manufactures different products and, therefore, is not
interchangeable. Natural or other uncontrollable occurrences at
any of our manufacturing facilities could significantly reduce
our productivity at such site and could prevent us from meeting
our customers requirements in a timely manner, or at all.
Our losses from any such occurrence could significantly affect
our operations and results of operations for a prolonged period
of time.
Our PV Powered solar inverters are manufactured in Bend, Oregon
and we have entered into a contract manufacturing relationship
in Canada. Our Solaron inverter products are manufactured at our
Fort Collins, Colorado facility and we have entered into
contract manufacturing relationships in the PRC and Canada as
well. While manufacturing could be shifted to a different
manufacturing location for the Solaron and PV Powered inverters
if a natural or other uncontrollable occurrence occurred, it may
take significant time to transition to another site and delivery
times and costs would likely increase preventing us from meeting
our customers requirements in a timely manner, or at all.
To the extent that local content requirements exist, we may also
be limited in such transitions.
We are
subject to risks inherent in international
operations.
Sales to our customers outside the United States were
approximately 41.1% of our total sales in 2010, 55.9% in 2009,
and 57.1% in 2008. Our success producing goods internationally
and competing in international markets is subject to our ability
to manage various risks and difficulties, including, but not
limited to:
|
|
|
|
|
our ability to effectively manage our employees at remote
locations who are operating in different business environments
from the United States;
|
|
|
|
our ability to develop and maintain relationships with suppliers
and other local businesses;
|
16
|
|
|
|
|
compliance with product safety requirements and standards that
are different from those of the United States;
|
|
|
|
variations and changes in laws applicable to our operations in
different jurisdictions, including enforceability of
intellectual property and contract rights;
|
|
|
|
trade restrictions, political instability, disruptions in
financial markets and deterioration of economic conditions;
|
|
|
|
customs regulations and the import and export of goods
(including, but not limited to, any United States imposition of
antidumping or countervailing duty orders, safeguards, remedies
or compensation with respect to our products or subcomponents of
our products, particularly those produced in the PRC);
|
|
|
|
the ability to provide sufficient levels of technical support in
different locations;
|
|
|
|
our ability to obtain business licenses that may be needed in
international locations to support expanded operations;
|
|
|
|
timely collecting accounts receivable from foreign customers
including $67.7 million in accounts receivable from foreign
customers as of December 31, 2010 ; and
|
|
|
|
changes in tariffs, taxes and foreign currency exchange rates.
|
Our profitability and ability to implement our business
strategies, maintain market share and compete successfully in
international markets will be compromised if we are unable to
manage these and other international risks successfully.
Our
operations in the Peoples Republic of China are subject to
significant political and economic uncertainties over which we
have little or no control and may be unable to alter our
business practice in time to avoid reductions in
revenues.
A significant portion of our operations outside the United
States are located in the PRC, which exposes us to risks, such
as exchange controls and currency restrictions, changes in local
economic conditions, changes in PRC laws and regulations,
possible expropriation or other PRC government actions, and
unsettled political conditions. These factors may have a
material adverse effect on our operations, business, results of
operations and financial condition.
The PRCs economy differs from the economies of most
developed countries in many respects, including with respect to
the amount of government involvement, level of development, rate
of growth, control of foreign exchange and allocation of
resources. While the economy of the PRC has experienced
significant growth in the past 20 years, growth has been
uneven across different regions and among various economic
sectors of the PRC. The PRC government has implemented various
measures to encourage economic development and guide the
allocation of resources. Some of these measures may benefit the
overall economy of the PRC, but may also have a negative effect
on us. For example, our financial condition and results of
operations may be adversely affected by government control over
capital investments or changes in tax regulations that are
applicable to us.
We
transitioned a significant amount of our supply base to Asian
suppliers.
We transitioned the purchasing of a substantial portion of
components for our thin film products, and continue to consider
transitioning additional purchasing related to our solar
inverters to Asian suppliers to lower our materials costs and
shipping expenses. These components might require us to incur
higher than anticipated testing or repairing costs, which would
have an adverse effect on our operating results. Customers who
have strict and extensive qualification requirements might not
accept our products if these lower-cost components do not meet
their requirements. A delay or refusal by our customers to
accept such products, as well as an inability of our suppliers
to meet our purchasing requirements, might require us to
purchase higher-priced components from our existing suppliers or
might cause us to lose sales to these customers, either of
17
which could lead to decreased revenue and gross margins and have
an adverse effect on our results of operations.
We
have entered into contract manufacturing relationships with
international suppliers for certain of our inverter
products.
We have entered into contract manufacturing relationships with
well-established suppliers in Canada and the PRC for the
manufacture of certain of our inverters. These relationships
will facilitate our compliance with localization requirements in
some world regions where incentives and benefits are granted for
local manufacturing. These relationships will also afford us a
more flexible manufacturing capacity, thereby enabling us to
maintain a competitive advantage in the marketplace for our
inverter products. These partners, working closely with us, will
in turn be developing a common supply chain for the components
that are incorporated into our inverters. While we believe that
our contract manufacturers are qualified to manufacture these
inverters for us, we may need to address short-term quality and
delivery scheduling issues as we develop this new supply chain
for these inverters. If we were to encounter significant quality
or delivery schedule concerns it might materially and adversely
affect our relationships with customers for these inverters and
our results of operations. As with many contract manufacturing
relationships, costs may be incurred if manufacturing capacity
is not fully utilized.
Changes
in tax rules, tax liabilities or utilization of our deferred tax
assets could materially affect our results.
Our future annual and quarterly tax rates could be affected by
numerous factors, including changes in the applicable tax laws,
composition of earnings in countries with differing tax rates or
our valuation and utilization of net deferred tax assets. In the
second half of 2009, we reconfigured our legal entity structure
to realign our Chinese manufacturing operations with the
intellectual property utilized in such manufacturing. On
December 31, 2009, we transferred the economic rights to
our patents and know-how from other affiliates throughout the
world, including the parent company. In general, we are subject
to regular examination of our income tax returns by the Internal
Revenue Service and other tax authorities. We regularly assess
the likelihood of favorable or unfavorable outcomes resulting
from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our
provision for income taxes. Although we believe our tax
estimates and reserves against deferred tax assets and uncertain
tax positions are reasonable, including those relied upon in the
execution of our entity restructuring, there can be no assurance
that any final determination will not be materially different
from the treatment reflected in our current or historical income
tax provisions and accruals, which could materially and
adversely affect our results of operations.
Feed-in
tariff and other subsidy cuts could impact revenue growth in the
renewable energy markets.
Feed-in tariffs have been a significant driver in the growth of
the solar industry, with countries throughout the world
providing incentives to spur adoption of renewable energy. While
many countries are beginning to adopt feed-in tariffs and
varying subsidies, others are re-evaluating the level of
incentive they wish to provide. Recently, a number of countries
have proposed reductions to their feed-in tariffs. As new
political parties take office in countries throughout the world,
agendas on renewable energy and governments desire or
ability to provide incentives may shift or change. Proposed
feed-in tariff reductions in regions in which we do significant
business could negatively affect the results of our operations.
Such a reduction in the feed-in tariff, including any potential
further reductions, could result in a significant decline in
demand and price levels for renewable energy products, which
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial
condition or results of operations.
Unfavorable
currency exchange rate fluctuations may lead to lower operating
margins, or may cause us to raise prices, which could result in
reduced sales.
Currency exchange rate fluctuations could have an adverse effect
on our sales and results of operations and we could experience
losses with respect to forward exchange contracts into which we
may enter. Unfavorable currency fluctuations could require us to
increase prices to foreign customers, which could
18
result in lower net sales by us to such customers.
Alternatively, if we do not adjust the prices for our products
in response to unfavorable currency fluctuations, our results of
operations could be materially and adversely affected. In
addition, most sales made by our foreign subsidiaries are
denominated in the currency of the country in which these
products are sold and the currency they receive in payment for
such sales could be less valuable at the time of receipt as a
result of exchange rate fluctuations. From time to time, we
enter into forward exchange contracts and local currency
purchased options to reduce currency exposure arising from
intercompany sales of inventory. However, we cannot be certain
that our efforts will be adequate to protect us against
significant currency fluctuations or that such efforts will not
expose us to additional exchange rate risks, which could
adversely affect our results of operations.
Changes
in the value of the Chinese yuan could impact the cost of our
operation in Shenzhen, PRC.
The PRC government is continually pressured by its trading
partners to allow its currency to float in a manner similar to
other major currencies. Any change in the value of the Chinese
yuan may impact our ability to control the cost of our products
in the world market. Specifically, the decision by the PRC
government to allow the yuan to begin to float against the
United States dollar could significantly increase the labor and
other costs incurred in the operation of our Shenzhen facility
and the cost of raw materials, parts, components and
subassemblies that we source in the PRC, thereby having a
material and adverse effect on our financial condition and
results of operations.
We are
highly dependent on our intellectual property.
Our success depends significantly on our proprietary technology.
We attempt to protect our intellectual property rights through
patents and non-disclosure agreements; however, we might not be
able to protect our technology, and competitors might be able to
develop similar technology independently. In addition, the laws
of some foreign countries might not afford our intellectual
property the same protections as do the laws of the United
States. Our intellectual property is not protected by patents in
several countries in which we do business, and we have limited
patent protection in other countries, including the PRC. The
cost of applying for patents in foreign countries and
translating the applications into foreign languages requires us
to select carefully the inventions for which we apply for patent
protection and the countries in which we seek such protection.
Generally, our efforts to obtain international patents have been
concentrated in the European Union and certain industrialized
countries in Asia, including Korea, Japan and Taiwan. If we are
unable to protect our intellectual property successfully, our
business, financial condition and results of operations could be
materially and adversely affected.
The PRC commercial law is relatively undeveloped compared to the
commercial law in the United States. Limited protection of
intellectual property is available under PRC law. Consequently,
manufacturing our products in the PRC may subject us to an
increased risk that unauthorized parties may attempt to copy our
products or otherwise obtain or use our intellectual property.
We cannot give assurance that we will be able to protect our
intellectual property rights effectively or have adequate legal
recourse in the event that we encounter infringements of our
intellectual property in the PRC.
We
have been, and in the future may again be, involved in
litigation. Litigation is costly and could result in further
restrictions on our ability to conduct business or an inability
to prevent others from using technology or make use of market
relationships we have developed.
Litigation may be necessary to enforce our commercial or
property rights, to defend ourselves against claimed violations
of such rights or to protect our interests in regulatory
disputes or similar matters. Litigation often requires
substantial management time and attention, as well as financial
and other resources, including:
|
|
|
|
|
substantial costs in the form of legal fees, fines and royalty
payments;
|
|
|
|
restrictions on our ability to sell certain products or in
certain markets;
|
|
|
|
an inability to prevent others from using technology we have
developed; and
|
|
|
|
a need to redesign products or seek alternative marketing
strategies.
|
19
Any of these events could have a significant adverse effect on
our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Funds
associated with our marketable securities that we have
traditionally held as short-term investments may not be liquid
or readily available.
In the past, certain of our investments have been affected by
external market conditions that impacted the liquidity of the
investment. We do not currently have investments with reduced
liquidity, but external market conditions that we cannot
anticipate or mitigate may impact the liquidity of our
marketable securities. We plan to increase the variety of our
investments during 2011. The lack of liquidity associated with
these investments may require us to borrow funds at terms that
are not favorable or repatriate cash from international
locations at a significant cost. We cannot be certain that we
will be able to borrow funds or continue to repatriate cash, on
favorable terms or at all. If we are unable to do so, our
available cash may be reduced until those investments can be
liquidated. The lack of available cash may prevent us from
taking advantage of business opportunities that arise and may
prevent us from executing some of our business plans, either of
which could cause our business, financial condition or results
of operations to be materially and adversely affected.
Our
intangible assets may become impaired.
We currently have $48.4 million of goodwill and
$48.4 million in intangible assets. We periodically review
the estimated useful lives of our goodwill and identifiable
intangible assets, taking into consideration any events or
circumstances that might result in either a diminished fair
value or, for intangible assets, a revised useful life. The
events and circumstances include significant changes in the
business climate, legal factors, operating performance
indicators and competition. Any impairment or revised useful
life could have a material and adverse effect on our financial
position and results of operations, and could harm the trading
price of our common stock.
We are
subject to numerous governmental regulations.
We are subject to federal, state, local and foreign regulations,
including environmental regulations and regulations relating to
the design and operation of our products and control systems. We
might incur significant costs as we seek to ensure that our
products meet safety and emissions standards, many of which vary
across the states and countries in which our products are used.
In the past, we have invested significant resources to redesign
our products to comply with these directives. Compliance with
future regulations, directives and standards could require us to
modify or redesign some products, make capital expenditures or
incur substantial costs. If we do not comply with current or
future regulations, directives and standards:
|
|
|
|
|
we could be subject to fines;
|
|
|
|
our production or shipments could be suspended; and
|
|
|
|
we could be prohibited from offering particular products in
specified markets.
|
If we were unable to comply with current or future regulations,
directives and standards our business, financial condition and
results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Recently
enacted financial reform legislation will result in new laws and
regulations that may increase our costs of
operations.
On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and
Consumer Protection Act (the Dodd-Frank Act) was
enacted. The Dodd-Frank Act requires various federal agencies to
adopt a broad range of new implementing rules and regulations,
and to prepare numerous studies and reports for Congress. The
federal agencies are given significant discretion in drafting
the implementing rules and regulations, and consequently, many
of the details and much of the impact of the Dodd-Frank Act may
not be known for many months or years. The Dodd-Frank Act
includes a requirement for disclosure regarding certain minerals
necessary to the functionality or production of a product
manufactured by reporting companies. Complying
20
with this disclosure requirement and other requirements of the
Dodd-Frank Act may increase our costs of operations.
The
market price of our common stock has fluctuated and may continue
to fluctuate for reasons over which we have no
control.
The stock market has from time to time experienced, and is
likely to continue to experience, extreme price and volume
fluctuations. Prices of securities of technology companies have
been especially volatile and have often fluctuated for reasons
that are unrelated to their operating performance. In the past,
companies that have experienced volatility in the market price
of their stock have been the subject of securities class action
litigation. If we were the subject of securities class action
litigation, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion
of our managements attention and resources.
Our
Chairman of the Board owns a significant percentage of our
outstanding common stock, which could enable him to influence
our business and affairs, and future sales of our common stock
by our Chairman of the Board may negatively affect the market
price of our common stock.
Douglas S. Schatz, our Chairman of the Board, beneficially owned
approximately 9.9% of our outstanding common stock as of
March 1, 2011. This stockholding gives Mr. Schatz
significant voting power and influence. Depending on the number
of shares that abstain or otherwise are not voted on a
particular matter, Mr. Schatz may be able to influence our
business affairs for the foreseeable future in a manner with
which our other stockholders may not agree. In addition, the
sale of a substantial amount of the shares beneficially owned by
him could negatively affect the market price of our common stock.
The
loss of any of our key personnel could significantly harm our
results of operations and competitive position.
Our success depends to a significant degree upon the continuing
contributions of our key management, technical, marketing and
sales employees. There can be no assurance that we will be
successful in retaining our key employees or that we can attract
or retain additional skilled personnel as required. Many of the
stock options held by our employees have exercise prices that
are higher than the current trading price of our common stock,
and these underwater options do not serve their
purpose as incentives for our employees to remain with the
Company. Failure to retain or attract key personnel could
significantly harm our results of operations and competitive
position.
Activities
necessary to integrate acquisitions may result in costs in
excess of current expectations or be less successful than
anticipated.
We recently acquired PV Powered, Inc., and we may acquire other
businesses in the future. The success of such transactions will
depend on, among other things, our ability to integrate assets
and personnel acquired in these transactions and to apply our
internal controls process to these acquired businesses. The
integration of acquisitions may require significant attention
from our management, and the diversion of managements
attention and resources could have a material adverse effect on
our ability to manage our business. Furthermore, we may not
realize the degree or timing of benefits we anticipated when we
first enter into the acquisition transaction. If actual
integration costs are higher than amounts originally
anticipated, if we are unable to integrate the assets and
personnel acquired in an acquisition as anticipated, or if we
are unable to fully benefit from anticipated synergies, our
business, financial condition, results of operations and cash
flows could be materially adversely affected.
The
disposition of the
Aera®
mass flow control business and related product lines may impact
our ongoing business relationships.
We recently sold our gas flow control business, which includes
our
Aera®
mass flow control and related product lines and real property in
Japan to Hitachi Metals, Ltd. (Hitachi Metals). Our
business may be impacted by unforeseen difficulties in
transitioning the gas flow control business, customers or
suppliers to
21
Hitachi Metals. As part of the transition of this product line
to Hitachi Metals, we have agreed to provide (i) cost-plus
contract manufacturing services for a period of twelve months
(with a potential one-time extension of six months),
(ii) supplemental information technology and customer order
processing services for up to six months, and (iii) sales
support and materials procurement services (along with access to
certain engineering tools) for a period of up to three months.
We also are required to work with Hitachi Metals
contractors with respect to the creation of an enterprise
resource planning system for Hitachi Metals, to manage the
acquired product lines. Our provision of these transition
services requires diversion of management attention and
resources, which could have an adverse effect on our own
business and operations.
Further, we continue to sell or seek to sell other products and
services to customers who are expected to purchase mass flow
control and products from Hitachi Metals. Some of these
customers are significant customers of the product lines we
retained. If Hitachi Metals is unsuccessful in its integration
of the gas flow control business into its business or otherwise
is unable to keep our mutual customers satisfied, such customers
may reduce or discontinue their purchases of our products as
well, which reductions or discontinuations could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial results and operations.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
None.
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
Information concerning our principal properties at
December 31, 2010 is set forth below:
|
|
|
|
|
Location
|
|
Principal Activity
|
|
Ownership
|
|
Fort Collins, CO
|
|
Corporate headquarters, research and development, manufacturing,
distribution, sales and service
|
|
Leased
|
Austin, TX
|
|
Distribution and service
|
|
Leased
|
Bend, OR
|
|
Research and development, manufacturing, distribution, sales and
service
|
|
Leased
|
Dallas, TX
|
|
Distribution and service
|
|
Leased
|
San Jose, CA
|
|
Distribution, sales and service
|
|
Leased
|
Vancouver, WA
|
|
Research and development, manufacturing, distribution, sales and
service
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shanghai, China
|
|
Distribution and sales
|
|
Leased
|
Shenzhen, China
|
|
Manufacturing and distribution
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dresden, Germany
|
|
Sales
|
|
Leased
|
Filderstadt, Germany
|
|
Distribution, sales and service
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hwasung Kyunggi-do, South Korea
|
|
Distribution, sales and service
|
|
Leased
|
Sungnam City, South Korea
|
|
Distribution, sales and service
|
|
Owned
|
Taipei, Taiwan
|
|
Distribution, sales and service
|
|
Leased
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hachioji, Japan
|
|
Research and development, distribution, sales and service
|
|
Leased
|
Hiroshima, Japan
|
|
Service
|
|
Leased
|
Osaka, Japan
|
|
Sales
|
|
Leased
|
Tohuko, Japan
|
|
Sales and service
|
|
Leased
|
22
We consider the properties that we own or lease as adequate to
meet our current and future requirements. We regularly assess
the size, capability and location of our global infrastructure
and periodically makes adjustments based on these assessments.
ITEM 3. LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
We are involved in disputes and legal actions arising in the
normal course of our business. While we currently believe that
the amount of any ultimate loss would not be material to our
financial position, the outcome of these actions is inherently
difficult to predict. In the event of an adverse outcome, the
ultimate loss could have a material adverse effect on our
financial position or reported results of operations. An
unfavorable decision in patent litigation also could require
material changes in production processes and products or result
in our inability to ship products or components found to have
violated third-party patent rights. We accrue loss contingencies
in connection with our commitments and contingencies, including
litigation, when it is probable that a loss has occurred and the
amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.
During 2008, the Customs Office of Taipei, Taiwan issued a
series of orders to our Taiwanese subsidiary, Advanced Energy
Taiwan, Ltd., requiring that certain of our products
manufactured in mainland China and allegedly imported without
proper authorization be removed from Taiwan. We protested the
orders based upon recent rulings of the Taiwan Bureau of Foreign
Trade that the products were authorized for unrestricted import.
We originally appealed the withdrawal order to the Taiwan High
Administrative Court which ruled against the Company in May
2009. We then appealed that decision to the Taiwan Supreme
Administrative Court. We previously recorded a charge of
$0.3 million as our best estimate of the amount likely to
be paid to resolve this matter. The case was settled in July
2010 and the charge of $0.3 million was reversed from cost
of sales as of September 30, 2010.
ITEM 4. REMOVED
AND RESERVED
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET
FOR REGISTRANTS COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Principal
Market and Price Range of Common Stock
Our common stock is listed on the NASDAQ Global Select Market
under the symbol AEIS. At March 1, 2011, the
number of common stockholders of record was 540, and the closing
sale price of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market on that day was $15.85 per share.
The table below shows the range of high and low closing sale
prices for our common stock as quoted (without retail markup or
markdown and without commissions) on the NASDAQ Global Select
Market:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
High
|
|
Low
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
16.66
|
|
|
$
|
13.12
|
|
|
$
|
10.42
|
|
|
$
|
5.49
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
17.43
|
|
|
$
|
11.50
|
|
|
$
|
10.35
|
|
|
$
|
7.73
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
18.16
|
|
|
$
|
11.99
|
|
|
$
|
14.44
|
|
|
$
|
9.34
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
15.13
|
|
|
$
|
11.47
|
|
|
$
|
15.08
|
|
|
$
|
10.93
|
|
Dividend
Policy
We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital
stock in our history as a public company. We currently intend to
retain all future earnings to finance our business and do not
anticipate paying cash or other dividends on our common stock in
the foreseeable future.
23
Performance
Graph
The performance graph below shows the five-year cumulative total
stockholder return on our common stock during the period from
December 31, 2005 through December 31, 2010. This is
compared with the cumulative total return of the NASDAQ
Composite Index and the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index (PHLX)
over the same period. The comparison assumes $100 was invested
on December 31, 2005 in Advanced Energy common stock and in
each of the foregoing indices and assumes reinvestment of
dividends, if any. Dollar amounts in the graph are rounded to
the nearest whole dollar. The performance shown in the graph
represents past performance and should not be considered an
indication of future performance.
COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Advanced Energy Industries,
Inc., the NASDAQ Composite Index and
the PHLX Semiconductor Index
*$100 invested on 12/31/05 in stock or index, including
reinvestment of dividends.
Indices and our stock performance calculated on a calendar
year-end basis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/05
|
|
|
12/06
|
|
|
12/07
|
|
|
12/08
|
|
|
12/09
|
|
|
12/10
|
|
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
|
|
|
$
|
100.00
|
|
|
$
|
159.51
|
|
|
$
|
110.57
|
|
|
$
|
84.11
|
|
|
$
|
127.47
|
|
|
$
|
115.30
|
|
NASDAQ Composite
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
111.16
|
|
|
|
124.64
|
|
|
|
73.80
|
|
|
|
107.07
|
|
|
|
125.99
|
|
PHLX Semiconductor
|
|
|
|
100.00
|
|
|
|
94.47
|
|
|
|
102.99
|
|
|
|
56.15
|
|
|
|
91.67
|
|
|
|
103.11
|
|
24
ITEM 6. SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
The selected Consolidated Statements of Operations data and the
related Consolidated Balance Sheets data were derived from our
audited Consolidated Financial Statements. The information below
is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations
and should be read in conjunction with Item 7,
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations of this
Form 10-K
in order to understand more fully the factors that may affect
the comparability of the information presented below:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of
Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
459,414
|
|
|
$
|
161,846
|
|
|
$
|
285,166
|
|
|
$
|
330,686
|
|
|
$
|
353,370
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
65,188
|
|
|
|
(97,140
|
)
|
|
|
5,255
|
|
|
|
29,645
|
|
|
|
53,678
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
67,409
|
|
|
|
(95,230
|
)
|
|
|
8,138
|
|
|
|
34,455
|
|
|
|
58,355
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
53,593
|
|
|
|
(101,812
|
)
|
|
|
(6,501
|
)
|
|
|
24,584
|
|
|
|
78,957
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
17,599
|
|
|
|
(893
|
)
|
|
|
4,722
|
|
|
|
9,777
|
|
|
|
9,365
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
71,192
|
|
|
|
(102,705
|
)
|
|
|
(1,779
|
)
|
|
|
34,361
|
|
|
|
88,322
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
$
|
(2.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
1.77
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
1.23
|
|
|
$
|
(2.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.54
|
|
|
$
|
1.74
|
|
Discontinued Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.22
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
|
$
|
0.21
|
|
Net Income (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
$
|
(2.45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.76
|
|
|
$
|
1.97
|
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
$
|
(2.45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.75
|
|
|
$
|
1.95
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
42,862
|
|
|
|
41,966
|
|
|
|
42,537
|
|
|
|
45,156
|
|
|
|
44,721
|
|
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
43,419
|
|
|
|
41,966
|
|
|
|
42,537
|
|
|
|
45,704
|
|
|
|
45,265
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
505,157
|
|
|
$
|
345,125
|
|
|
$
|
420,637
|
|
|
$
|
459,028
|
|
|
$
|
411,903
|
|
Total long-term debt and lease obligations
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
|
164
|
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
|
329
|
|
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENTS
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
Certain statements set forth below under this caption constitute
forward-looking statements. See Business
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements in
Item 1 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for additional factors relating to such statements, and see
Risk Factors in Item 1A for a discussion
of certain risks applicable to our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
Business
Overview and Presentation
2010 was a year of significant strategic and financial
accomplishments for Advanced Energy. Having emerged from one of
the most severe declines the capital equipment industry has ever
experienced, fiscal 2009 was characterized by credit constraints
in the financial markets and a weak global economy that
negatively impacted all of the markets we serve. 2010 saw an
equally unparalleled rebound. Advanced Energy demonstrated speed
and flexibility in responding to the changing market conditions
and needs of its customers, generating nearly $460 million
in total revenue and $1.23 in diluted earnings per share.
25
Business
acquisition and disposition
Of the many milestones we achieved in 2010, the most noteworthy
came in the form of strategic endeavors. First, we expanded our
solar inverter business with the acquisition of PV Powered in
May 2010, a privately-held Oregon corporation based in Bend,
Oregon. PV Powered is a leading manufacturer of grid tie PV
inverters in the residential, commercial and utility-scale
markets. The distinctive combination of PVs exceptional
line of products with our high-powered Solarons has afforded us
a position among the leaders in one of the fastest-growing
markets for inverters, the North American solar inverter market.
We further focused these efforts by divesting our gas flow
control business in October 2010, which included our
Aera®
mass flow control and related product lines, to Hitachi Metals,
Ltd.
Additional information on the sales price, payment terms and
other financial data should be read in conjunction with our
Consolidated Financial Statements, including the notes thereto,
in Item 8 of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of consolidated financial statements and related
disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America
(U.S. GAAP) requires management to make
judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts
reported. Note 1 Operations and Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates to our
Consolidated Financial Statements describes the significant
accounting policies used in the preparation of our Consolidated
Financial Statements. The accounting positions described below
are significantly affected by critical accounting estimates.
Such accounting positions require significant judgments,
assumptions, and estimates to be used in the preparation of the
Consolidated Financial Statements, actual results could differ
materially from the amounts reported based on variability in
factors affecting these statements.
Revenue
Recognition
We recognize revenue from product sales upon transfer of title
and risk of loss to our customers provided that there is
evidence of an arrangement, the sales price is fixed or
determinable and the collection of the related receivable is
reasonably assured. In most transactions, we have no obligations
to our customers after the date products are shipped other than
pursuant to warranty obligations. For customers purchasing our
Renewables products, we provide installation, support and
services after the product has been shipped. We defer the fair
value of any undelivered elements until the undelivered element
is delivered. Fair value is the price charged when the element
is sold separately. Shipping and handling fees billed to
customers, if any, are recognized as revenue. The related
shipping and handling costs are recognized in cost of sales.
We maintain a credit approval process and we make significant
judgments in connection with assessing our customers
ability to pay at the time of shipment. The customers purchasing
our Renewables products require larger credit limits than those
purchasing our Thin Film products. Despite this assessment, from
time to time, our customers are unable to meet their payment
obligations. We continuously monitor our customers credit
worthiness, and use our judgment in establishing a provision for
estimated credit losses based upon our historical experience and
any specific customer collection issues that we have identified.
While such credit losses have historically been within our
expectations and the provisions established, there is no
assurance that we will continue to experience the same credit
loss rates that we have in the past. A significant change in the
liquidity or financial position of our customers could have a
material adverse impact on the collectability of accounts
receivable and our future operating results.
Inventory
We value our inventory at the lower of cost
(first-in,
first-out method) or market. We regularly review inventory
quantities on hand and record a provision to write-down excess
and obsolete inventory to its estimated net realizable value, if
less than cost, based primarily on our estimated forecast of
product demand. Demand for our products can fluctuate
significantly. Our industry is subject to technological change,
new
26
product development and product technological obsolescence that
could result in an increase in the amount of obsolete inventory
quantities on hand. Therefore, any significant unanticipated
changes in demand or technological developments could have a
significant impact on the value of our inventory and our
reported operating results.
Warranty
Costs
We provide for the estimated costs to fulfill customer warranty
obligations upon the recognition of the related revenue. We
offer warranty coverage for a majority of our thin-film products
for periods typically ranging from 12 to 24 months after
shipment. We warrant our solar inverter products for five to ten
years. We estimate the anticipated costs of repairing our
products under such warranties based on the historical costs of
the repairs and any known specific product issues. The
assumptions we use to estimate warranty accruals are reevaluated
periodically in light of actual experience and, when
appropriate, the accruals are adjusted. Should product failure
rates differ from our estimates, actual costs could vary
significantly from our expectations.
Intangible
Assets, Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets
We completed our acquisition of PV Powered in May 2010 for a
total cost of $90.3 million. In addition, we sold our gas
flow control business for approximately $43.3 million. As a
result of our acquisition, we recorded intangible assets and
goodwill. Goodwill is subject to annual impairment testing as
well as testing upon the occurrence of any event that indicates
a potential impairment. Intangible assets and other long-lived
assets are subject to an impairment test if there is an
indicator of impairment. The carrying value and ultimate
realization of these assets is dependent upon our estimates of
future earnings and benefits that we expect to generate from
their use. If our expectations of future results and cash flows
are significantly diminished, intangible assets, long-lived
assets and goodwill may be impaired and the resulting charge to
operations may be material. When we determine that the carrying
value of intangibles or other long-lived assets may not be
recoverable based upon the existence of one or more indicators
of impairment, we use the projected undiscounted cash flow
method to determine whether an impairment exists, and then
measure the impairment using discounted cash flows and other
fair value measurements. To measure impairment for goodwill, we
compare the fair value of our reporting units by measuring
discounted cash flows to the book value of the reporting units.
Goodwill would be impaired if the resulting implied fair value
of goodwill was less than the recorded book value of the
goodwill.
The estimation of useful lives and expected cash flows require
us to make significant judgments regarding future periods that
are subject to some factors outside of our control. Changes in
these estimates can result in significant revisions to our
carrying value of these assets and may result in material
charges to our results of operations.
Income
Taxes
We assess the recoverability of our net deferred tax assets and
the need for a valuation allowance on a quarterly basis. Our
assessment includes a number of factors, including historical
results and taxable income projections for each jurisdiction.
The ultimate realization of deferred income tax assets is
dependent on the generation of taxable income in appropriate
jurisdictions during the periods in which those temporary
differences are deductible. We consider our scheduled reversal
of deferred income tax liabilities, projected future taxable
income, and tax planning strategies in determining the amount of
our valuation allowance.
Accounting for income taxes requires a two-step approach to
recognize and measure uncertain tax positions. The first step is
to evaluate our tax position by determining if, based on the
technical merits, it is more likely than not that our position
will be sustained upon audit, including resolutions of related
appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to
measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than
50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. We
regularly assess the likelihood of favorable or unfavorable
outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the
adequacy of our provision for income taxes. This evaluation is
based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in facts
or circumstances, changes in tax law, effectively settled issues
under audit and new audit activity.
27
Although we believe our tax estimates and reserves, including
those for uncertain tax positions, are reasonable, including
those relied upon in the execution of our entity restructuring,
there can be no assurance that any final determination will not
be materially different from the treatment reflected in our
current or historical income tax provisions and accruals, which
could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.
Business
Environment and Trends
SEMICONDUCTORS
The industry has witnessed some underlying changes as we exited
2010. The increase of capital investment that occurred
throughout the year slowed to some extent in the fourth quarter,
particularly in the area of 300mm semiconductor tools wafer
production. Suppliers across the industry were negatively
impacted as the current round of investment ended for several
large manufacturers. We anticipate the resumption of capital
investment over the course of the year or potentially sooner,
given that a number of manufacturers have announced plans for
new rounds of capital expenditure primarily for 300mm wafer
production. Additionally, we believe a fundamental shift is
occurring as the industry moves from dynamic random access
memory (DRAM) to NAND flash memory for use in tablet
PCs such as iPads. There has also been growth in solid state
drives. DRAM has been the predominant driver of the
semiconductor industry over the last six quarters, but as the
industry moves towards NAND flash memory, we expect an impact in
a number of companies and regions such as Korea. The increased
focus on NAND flash memory may result in market share shifts,
towards those strong in NAND and Etch tool technology. We also
believe some manufacturers are re-purposing fabrication lines in
order to enter the foundry business and will require additional
investment.
Another 2010 industry driver was the re-tooling of 200mm wafer
fabs, which led to significant growth in sales of used tools and
legacy products for OEMs. This shift to older products was
driven by demand for electronic components that do not required
300mm, such as analog circuits for power electronics in
automobiles. More recently however, 300mm tools are again being
shipped as fabs prepare for the next technological shift and
further capacity increases.
FLAT
PANEL DISPLAY
We have seen several quarters of increasing revenue and capital
investment largely centered around higher generation LCD panels
(Generation 8 and above). Looking ahead, there are a variety of
non-traditional market factors that may stimulate the next round
of capital investment by equipment manufacturers, such as more
complex technologies and smaller panels for tablet PCs, as well
as proximity touch screens and LED back-lighting.
We anticipate capacity additions for LCD and more technology
advancements around organic light emitting diodes
(OLEDs), especially in Korea. While the exact
timeline of investment cycles can be challenging to pinpoint in
this market, we believe they will occur in the next 12 to
18 months. We are working diligently to position ourselves
with the right customers, such as those in Korea, and the right
products in order to capitalize on these trends and drive sales.
While this continues to be a somewhat unpredictable market, we
expect to see an increase in sales during the second half of the
year, specifically in Etch tools.
THIN FILM
RENEWABLES
Throughout 2010, we saw strong demand for our crystalline
silicon PV products in both Europe and the PRC. We anticipate
investment and demand for these products to remain stable for
most of 2011. There have been indications of a slowdown in the
European market as governments in many European countries have
reduced available incentives and
feed-in-tariffs,
but the Chinese market is expected to grow due to the Chinese
governments investment in solar panel manufacturing
capacity. The North American market grew in 2010 as larger
megawatt output solar array projects resulted in an increase in
the demand for solar panels. We anticipate that consumption of
inventory will slow demand slightly in early 2011, but capacity
for panel manufacturing remains high and we believe this will
drive sales higher in the second half of the year.
28
INVERTER
We experienced exponential growth in the inverter market in
2010. Along with the global expansion of our Solaron inverter
product into Europe, this increase was also driven by our
acquisition of PV Powered. The majority of our sales in the
inverter market continue to come from commercial and
utility-scale applications, particularly for large central
inverters over 250kW and our 1-2 MW integrated power
sub-station
solutions. Market demand in Europe may slow in 2011 because of
changes to
and/or
reductions in
feed-in-tariff
incentives in certain countries, but we anticipate growth in
demand in North America due to lucrative government incentives
in Canada as well as planned investment by utilities in the
United States. As a result of the above factors and full year of
inverter revenue associated with the acquisition of PV Powered,
sales in this market will increase in 2011 as compared to 2010.
Results
of Operations
Our analysis presented below is organized to provide the
information we believe will be instructive for understanding our
historical performance and relevant trends going forward. Our
results of operations include the operating results of PV
Powered for the period May 3, 2010 through
December 31, 2010. Operating results applicable to our gas
flow control business are excluded from our results of
continuing operations for all periods presented. This discussion
should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial
Statements, including the notes thereto, in Item 8 of this
Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated,
certain data derived from our Consolidated Statements of
Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
459,414
|
|
|
$
|
161,846
|
|
|
$
|
285,166
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
199,199
|
|
|
|
49,790
|
|
|
|
109,570
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
134,011
|
|
|
|
146,930
|
|
|
|
104,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
65,188
|
|
|
|
(97,140
|
)
|
|
|
5,255
|
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
2,221
|
|
|
|
1,910
|
|
|
|
2,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
67,409
|
|
|
|
(95,230
|
)
|
|
|
8,138
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
13,816
|
|
|
|
6,582
|
|
|
|
14,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
53,593
|
|
|
$
|
(101,812
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,501
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the
percentage of sales represented by certain items reflected in
our Consolidated Statements of Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
43.4
|
%
|
|
|
30.8
|
%
|
|
|
38.4
|
%
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
29.2
|
%
|
|
|
90.8
|
%
|
|
|
36.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
|
(60.0
|
%)
|
|
|
1.8
|
%
|
Other income, net
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
1.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
14.7
|
%
|
|
|
(58.8
|
%)
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
4.1
|
%
|
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations
|
|
|
11.7
|
%
|
|
|
(62.9
|
%)
|
|
|
(2.3
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
29
SALES
The following tables summarize annual net sales, and percentages
of net sales, by product type for each of the years ended 2010,
2009, and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Increase/ (Decrease)
|
|
|
Percent Change
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
2010 v. 2009
|
|
|
2009 v. 2008
|
|
|
2010 v. 2009
|
|
|
2009 v. 2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Semiconductor capital equipment market
|
|
$
|
174,404
|
|
|
$
|
62,991
|
|
|
$
|
110,724
|
|
|
$
|
111,413
|
|
|
$
|
(47,733
|
)
|
|
|
176.9
|
%
|
|
|
(43.1
|
%)
|
Non-semiconductor capital equipment
|
|
|
236,856
|
|
|
|
61,725
|
|
|
|
117,760
|
|
|
|
175,131
|
|
|
|
(56,035
|
)
|
|
|
283.7
|
%
|
|
|
(47.6
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product
|
|
|
411,260
|
|
|
|
124,716
|
|
|
|
228,484
|
|
|
|
286,544
|
|
|
|
(103,768
|
)
|
|
|
229.8
|
%
|
|
|
(45.4
|
%)
|
Global support
|
|
|
48,154
|
|
|
|
37,130
|
|
|
|
56,682
|
|
|
|
11,024
|
|
|
|
(19,552
|
)
|
|
|
29.7
|
%
|
|
|
(34.5
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
$
|
459,414
|
|
|
$
|
161,846
|
|
|
$
|
285,166
|
|
|
$
|
297,568
|
|
|
$
|
(123,320
|
)
|
|
|
183.9
|
%
|
|
|
(43.2
|
%)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Semiconductor capital equipment market
|
|
|
|
38.0
|
%
|
|
|
38.9
|
%
|
|
|
38.8
|
%
|
Non-semiconductor capital equipment
|
|
|
|
51.5
|
%
|
|
|
38.2
|
%
|
|
|
41.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total product
|
|
|
|
89.5
|
%
|
|
|
77.1
|
%
|
|
|
80.1
|
%
|
Global support
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
|
22.9
|
%
|
|
|
19.9
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
Sales
Total sales for the twelve months ended December 31, 2010
increased 183.9% to $459.4 million from $161.8 million
for the twelve months ended December 31, 2009. The increase
in sales was driven by a recovery in all of the end markets that
we serve along with the continued expansion of our global
footprint, particularly in Europe, for sales of our Solaron
inverter. Our acquisition of PV Powered on May 3, 2010
added an additional $65.7 million in sales from May 3,
2010 to December 31, 2010.
Total sales decreased 43.2% to $161.8 million in 2009 as
compared to 2008. This reflected significantly reduced demand in
2009 for manufacturing equipment and services due to extremely
unfavorable global economic and industry conditions. The global
negative trends in customer spending and the pervasive economic
uncertainty made many of our customers significantly reduce
their factory operations and cut back their capital spending
plans for capacity expansion. This severely impacted the demand
for our products for 2009. The market has recovered
significantly in 2010.
Semiconductor
Market Sales
In 2010, semiconductor market sales rose 176.9% to
$174.4 million, or 38.0% of sales, from $63.0 million,
or 38.9% of sales in 2009. We believe that demand in the
semiconductor capital equipment market continued to grow
throughout 2010 as technology investments at foundries drove a
rebuilding of inventory to satisfy the consumer electronics
market. In the near term, we expect that a transition from
dynamic random access memory to flash memory will result in
continued investment in new products and capacity in the
semiconductor capital equipment industry. We expect our 2011
sales in this market to be similar to that of 2010.
Sales to the semiconductor capital equipment market decreased
43.1% in 2009 as compared to 2008 as end market demand for
products that included semiconductors fell in the wake of the
global economic crisis. The drop in demand reduced factory use
and significantly reduced the need for semiconductor fabrication
expansion. The semiconductor capital equipment market was
severely affected by these developments and demand for our
products in these markets decreased from previous levels.
Non-semiconductor
Market Sales
Total sales to the non-semiconductor capital equipment markets
increased 283.7% to $236.9 million, or 51.5% of sales, in
2010 compared to $61.7 million, or 38.2% of sales, in 2009.
The markets that comprise
30
our non-semiconductor capital equipment markets include flat
panel display, solar panel, data storage, architectural glass
and other industrial thin-film manufacturing equipment markets
and our solar inverter market. With the exception of the solar
inverter market, our customers in these markets are
predominantly large OEMs for new equipment. Our customers
in the solar inverter market are predominantly large system
integrators, independent power producers and public utilities.
The increase in non-semiconductor sales was due to capacity
expansion in the flat panel display market, capacity expansion
in the solar panel market, growth of solar array installations
in the U.S. and Europe for solar inverters and the addition
of PV Powered to our 2010 revenue stream.
Total sales to our non-semiconductor equipment markets declined
47.6% in 2009 as compared to 2008 as these markets were also
adversely affected by the pervasive factors previously
mentioned, including the credit constraints in the financial
markets and the negative trends in consumer spending. The drop
in end-market demand reduced factory use and significantly
reduced the need for capacity expansion in our non-semiconductor
markets.
Sales to customers in the flat panel market increased 200.0% to
$28.5 million, or 6.2% of total sales in 2010 as compared
to $9.5 million, or 5.9% of total sales, in 2009. In this
market, we are seeing a continued cycle of investing by panel
manufacturers in Korea and the PRC which is driven by the market
adoption of flat panels by Chinese consumers, the growth in
touch screens for tablet PCs and smart phones and the migration
of new technology such as LED backlighting and 3D televisions
around the world. We anticipate continued investment in touch
panel technology in 2011 and our near-term expectation is that
sales in the flat panel market will increase slightly in 2011.
Flat panel market sales decreased 56.3% in 2009 as compared to
2008 because of the overall economic downturn described earlier.
Sales to customers in the solar panel market increased 205.1% to
$58.8 million, or 12.8% of total sales, in 2010 as compared
to $19.3 million, or 11.9% of total sales, in 2009.
Throughout 2010, we saw strong demand for our crystalline
silicon PV products in both Europe and the PRC. We anticipate
investment and demand for these products to remain stable for
most of 2011. There have been indications of a slowdown in the
European market as governments in many European countries have
reduced available incentives and
feed-in-tariffs.
The PRC market is expected to grow due to the PRC
governments investment in solar panel manufacturing
capacity. The North American market grew in 2010 as larger
megawatt output solar array projects resulted in an increase in
the demand for solar panels. We anticipate that consumption of
inventory will slow demand slightly in early 2011, but capacity
for panel manufacturing remains high and we believe this will
drive sales higher in the second half of the year.
Solar panel manufacturers installed substantial panel
manufacturing capacity prior to 2010, and as a result of
declining panel sales caused in part by the global recession,
built significant inventory. The majority of solar panel
manufacturers must work through their current inventory levels
before their factory use will be at a point where they will need
to expand capacity. This, and the general world-wide economic
decline, resulted in decreased sales to customers in the solar
market by 60.9% in 2009 as compared to 2008.
Sales to the solar inverter market grew 1,261.1% to
$105.7 million, or 23.0% of total sales, in 2010, as
compared to $7.8 million, or 4.8% of total sales, in 2009.
Along with the global expansion of our Solaron inverter product,
this increase was also driven by our acquisition of PV Powered.
The majority of our sales in the inverter market continues to
come from commercial and utility-scale applications. The
addition of PV Powereds product portfolio expands the
range of power capacities in which we can compete and added a
line of residential inverters. We successfully installed our
first inverters in the European market in 2010 and expect
continued penetration in that market during 2011. Market demand
in Europe may slow in 2011 because of changes to
and/or
reductions in
feed-in-tariff
incentives in certain countries, but we anticipate growth in
demand in North America due to lucrative government incentives
in Canada as well as planned investment by utilities in the
United States. As a result of the above factors and full year of
inverter revenue associated with the acquisition of PV Powered,
sales in this market will increase in 2011 as compared to 2010.
Sales to the solar inverter market increased from
$2.4 million in 2008 to $7.8 million in 2009 because
of increased demand from commercial markets.
31
Global
Support Revenue
Global support revenue grew 29.7% to $48.2 million, or
10.5% of total sales, in 2010 compared to $37.1 million,
representing 22.9% of sales, in 2009. The increase in global
support sales was due to an increase in factory utilization by
our customers throughout 2010, which drove demand for repairs,
replacement parts and inventory restocking. The outlook for our
service business in 2011 continues to be strong as we take
advantage of a growing trend in the market related to reuse and
repurposing of used equipment. Factory utilization is very high
currently and our customers are looking to us to provide them
with used and refurbished equipment to be used as spares for
their fabrication lines. Additionally, we expect our service
business in the inverter market to continue to grow as we
increase the number of solar PV sites under operations and
maintenance contracts.
Sales from our global support business decreased 34.5% in 2009
as compared to 2008 in part from a continuing practice by our
customers of using spare parts inventory and idle equipment for
spare parts in efforts to conserve cash as opposed to repairing
malfunctioning or worn parts.
Applied Materials Inc., our largest customer, accounted for
$86.4 million, or 18.8% of our sales in 2010;
$34.7 million, or 21.4%, of our sales in 2009; and
$62.2 million, or 21.8%, of our sales in 2008. Our sales to
Applied Materials included sales for the semiconductor capital
equipment market, as well as the solar and flat panel display
markets.
GROSS
PROFIT
Our gross profit was $199.2 million, or 43.4% of revenue in
2010, $49.8 million, or 30.8% of revenue, in 2009 and
$109.6 million, or 38.4% of revenue, in 2008. The large
increase in both absolute dollars and as a percentage of revenue
in 2010 when compared to 2009 was due to an overall boost in
production volume and increased leverage from factory overhead,
plus reduced warranty costs as a percent of total sales
resulting from lower warranty claims. We expect our gross profit
to decrease slightly as a percentage of sales during 2011 since
the gross margins related to our renewable inverter product is
lower than the gross margins related to our traditional
thin-films business. We anticipate gross margins to increase in
terms of absolute dollars due to an increase in overall sales
volume for 2011.
The decrease in our gross profit, in both absolute dollars and
as a percentage of revenue, in 2009 as compared to 2008 was due
to an overall decrease in production volume related to the
weakness in the economy resulting in a lack of absorption of our
factory costs therefore reducing our gross margin. In response
to the decrease in production volume in 2009 we reduced our
overall manufacturing costs by reducing fixed production and
overhead costs including personnel costs and discretionary
spending.
OPERATING
EXPENSE
The following table summarizes our operating expenses as a
percentage of sales for the years ended 2010, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
$
|
56,604
|
|
|
|
12.3
|
%
|
|
|
41,132
|
|
|
$
|
25.4
|
%
|
|
|
52,125
|
|
|
$
|
18.3
|
%
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
74,543
|
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
|
38,040
|
|
|
|
23.5
|
%
|
|
|
48,241
|
|
|
|
16.9
|
%
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
63,260
|
|
|
|
39.1
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
2,864
|
|
|
|
0.6
|
%
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
0.1
|
%
|
|
|
462
|
|
|
|
0.2
|
%
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
4,376
|
|
|
|
2.7
|
%
|
|
|
3,487
|
|
|
|
1.2
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$
|
134,011
|
|
|
|
29.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
146,930
|
|
|
|
90.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
104,315
|
|
|
|
36.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In response to the extremely unfavorable global economic and
industry conditions, we implemented cost reductions in 2009.
Some of the cost reductions were business restructuring which
were permanent in
32
nature. These included reductions of personnel headcounts across
all functions and geographies and consolidation of facilities on
a worldwide basis. Additionally, we implemented cost-cutting
initiatives that were more temporary in nature such as cuts in
discretionary spending, including travel expense and
professional fees, as well as pay cuts for management-level
personnel, company-wide shutdowns and reductions in employee
benefits. In order to meet the current level of demand, as well
as implement strategic projects that drive continued
international growth and sales opportunities, we increased
headcount in 2010 and, as a result, incurred more discretionary
spending in 2010 than in 2009.
The rapid increase in demand in the markets we serve has
challenged our production capacity as well as our ability to
meet the tight deadlines of our customers. As a result, we
increased spending in our production facilities in order to meet
our customers demands and take full advantage of the
market opportunities presented to us in 2010. Additionally, we
added employees and operating expenses related to the
acquisition of PV Powered as well as for the infrastructure
necessary to expand our global presence to new markets
throughout the world. While these increases were necessary to
successfully manage the current rate and speed of our business,
we remain committed to sustaining prudent spending levels.
Research
and Development
The markets we serve constantly present opportunities to develop
products for new or emerging applications and require
technological changes driving for higher performance, lower
cost, and other attributes that will advance our customers
products. We believe that continued and timely development of
new and differentiated products, as well as enhancements to
existing products to support customer requirements, are critical
for us to compete in the markets we serve. Accordingly, we
devote significant personnel and financial resources to the
development of new products and the enhancement of existing
products, and we expect these investments to continue. All of
our research and development costs have been expensed as
incurred.
The increase in research and development expenses of
$15.5 million in the twelve months ended December 31,
2010 as compared to the same period in 2009 was driven primarily
by slight increases in personnel costs, including the reversal
of the temporary cost control efforts implemented in 2009 and
2008, outside consulting and travel. Additionally, this variance
includes increased spending as a result of the engineering
personnel absorbed in the PV Powered acquisition. We continue to
focus on new product development and, although we have
maintained a very cautious approach to our discretionary
spending in 2010, we anticipate that research and development
expenses will continue to increase in 2011 in terms of absolute
dollars, due to a full year of employee costs related to the
acquisition of PV Powered. Research and Development costs should
decrease as a percentage of sales.
The decrease in research and development expenses of
$11.0 million in 2009 as compared to 2008 was driven
primarily by decreases of $9.5 million in personnel costs,
$1.5 million in engineering material, and $0.3 million
in travel costs. The large decrease in engineering material was
offset by an $0.8 million charge for excess engineering
inventory, which is charged to expense at time of purchase.
Overall, the decrease in material costs was due to more
effective spending controls related to engineering projects.
Selling,
General and Administrative
Our selling expenses support domestic and international sales
and marketing activities that include personnel, trade shows,
advertising, third-party sales representative commissions, and
other selling and marketing activities. Our general and
administrative expenses support our worldwide corporate, legal,
tax, financial, governance, administrative, information systems
and human resource functions in addition to our general
management.
The increase in SG&A expenses of $36.5 million in 2010
as compared to 2009 was primarily driven by increases in sales
personnel, commissions and travel expenses to meet the
expectations and demands of our global customers, increased
personnel costs related to the reversal of the temporary cost
control efforts described earlier in this section, and the
accrual of incentive compensation totaling $16.5 million
during 2010 as compared to no incentive compensation expense in
2009. We incurred $0.8 million of transaction costs related
to the acquisition of PV Powered during 2010 as well as
additional costs related to employees added
33
through the acquisition. We are aware of the growing needs of
our customers during this period of revenue growth and we
anticipate that SG&A expenses will continue to increase in
2011 in terms of absolute dollars due to an expected increase in
sales as well as a full year of employee costs related to our
acquisition of PV Powered. In 2011 we will continue to closely
scrutinize and monitor increases to our SG&A expenses
throughout the year and we anticipate that these costs will
remain within their current range as a percentage of sales.
Continued reduction of personnel-related and other discretionary
costs drove overall SG&A costs lower by $10.2 million
in 2009 as compared to 2008. Personnel costs decreased by
$4.8 million, purchased services decreased by
$2.5 million, and travel was reduced by $1.8 million
in 2009 as compared to 2008, offset by a $1.1 million
increase in bad debt expense. The increase in bad debt expense
in 2009 was a result of certain customers deteriorating
financial condition.
Goodwill
Impairment Charge
We perform a goodwill impairment analysis using the two-step
method annually as of October 31 and whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of goodwill
may not be recoverable. The recoverability of goodwill is
measured by comparing the carrying amount of the applicable
reporting unit, including goodwill, to its fair market value.
Based upon a combination of factors in early 2009, including a
significant decline in our market capitalization below our
carrying value, the deteriorating macro-economic environment,
which had resulted in a significant decline in customer demand,
and illiquidity in the overall credit markets, we concluded that
sufficient indicators existed to require us to perform an
interim goodwill impairment analysis at February 28, 2009.
We determined our fair market value at February 28, 2009
based on our market capitalization and an average weighting of
both projected discounted future cash flows and the use of
comparative market multiples and relative control premiums. The
use of comparative market multiples (the market approach) uses
other comparable companies valuation multiples to arrive
at a fair value. The use of discounted cash flows was based on
assumptions that were consistent with our estimates of future
growth and our strategic plan to manage the underlying business,
and also included a probability-weighted expectation as to our
future cash flows. Factors requiring significant judgment
include assumptions related to future growth rates, discount
factors, and tax rates, along with other considerations.
Having determined that our goodwill was potentially impaired, we
performed the second step of the goodwill impairment analysis
which involved allocating the overall estimated fair value of
the Company to all of our assets and liabilities other than
goodwill (including both recognized and unrecognized intangible
assets) and comparing the residual amount to the carrying value
of goodwill. In March 2009, we determined that our goodwill was
fully impaired and recorded a non-cash goodwill impairment
charge of $63.3 million. This charge eliminated the
goodwill balance as of December 31, 2009.
All goodwill on our Consolidated Balance Sheet as of
December 31, 2010 resulted from the acquisition of PV
Powered.
Amortization
Expense
Amortization expense was $2.9 million for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2010, compared to $0.1 million for
the same period ending December 31, 2009 and
$0.5 million for the same period ending December 31,
2008. The increase of $2.7 million in 2010 from 2009 is due
to the acquisition of approximately $51.3 million in
amortizable assets with the purchase of PV Powered. It is
estimated that amortization expense will continue to increase to
approximately $3.7 million in 2011 and will continue to
increase in the foreseeable future. See Note 10
Intangible Asset to our Consolidated Financial Statements
for additional information on intangible assets and related
future amortization.
34
Restructuring
Charges
Restructuring costs are related to actions taken in 2009 and
2008 primarily in response to downturns in our markets. These
costs were incurred to exit an activity or cancel an existing
contractual obligation, including the closure of facilities and
employee termination related charges.
We implemented cost reduction efforts in response to
deteriorating economic conditions and weakening demand from our
end markets. As a result, we incurred restructuring costs of
$4.4 million in 2009. The costs incurred were primarily
severance and benefits related to reductions in personnel. We
did not incur any restructuring costs in 2010. We continue to
look for ways to make our global workforce more efficient and
effective, which may lead to additional cost reduction
activities in the future.
In 2008, we recognized restructuring costs of $3.5 million,
of which $3.2 million was associated with global cost
reduction plans with respect to reductions in personnel
implemented at various times throughout the year. The remaining
$0.3 million of restructuring charges recognized in 2008
were a result of a plan to transition the production of a number
of our legacy products from our manufacturing facility in
Fort Collins, Colorado to our manufacturing facility in
Shenzhen, PRC. This activity in 2008 led to the elimination of
approximately 140 positions on a worldwide basis.
Other
Income, Net
Other income (expense), net consists primarily of interest
income and expense, foreign exchange gains and losses and other
miscellaneous items.
Interest income for the twelve month period ending
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 has consistently decreased
each year from $5.0 million in 2008 to $1.4 million in
2009 to $0.5 million in 2010 as a result of much lower
interest rates available in financial markets in 2010 and 2009
compared to 2008 and moving more dollars out of investments and
into unrestricted cash over this three year period.
Other income, net was $1.7 million in 2010,
$0.5 million in 2009 and a $2.1 million loss in 2008.
The increase in 2010 as compared to 2009 was mainly due to
$1.2 million in net revenue recognized in 2010 from PV
Powereds participation in the Solar Energy Grid System
Program sponsored by the Department of Energy. This was offset
by a $0.8 million decrease in interest income in 2010
resulting from lower interest rates.
Provision
for Income Taxes
During 2010, we were profitable in almost all the jurisdictions
in which we operated. As a result, we accrued income taxes at
statutory rates that vary by location. We recorded an income tax
provision of $13.8 million during the year ended
December 31, 2010. The 2010 income tax provision consisted
of $6.2 million of tax on income in foreign jurisdictions
and $7.6 million of U.S. federal and state income
taxes,.
In the second half of 2009, we reconfigured our legal entity
structure to realign our PRC manufacturing operations with the
intellectual property utilized in such manufacturing. On
December 31, 2009, we transferred the economic rights to
our patents and know-how between affiliates throughout the
world, including our parent company. As a result of this
realignment, we generated $84.4 million of taxable income
during 2009 in the United States and Japan and, thus, reversed a
portion of our valuation allowance and utilized previously
reserved deferred tax assets upon filing our 2009 tax return.
In 2009, we recorded an income tax provision of
$6.6 million. The provision was driven primarily by
$6.3 million of tax on income in foreign jurisdictions and
$1.0 million of federal income tax, which was comprised of
$3.6 million of tax expense related to reserves for
uncertain tax positions, offset by $2.6 million of federal
benefit. The remainder related to $0.7 million benefit for
state taxes.
Our future effective income tax rate depends on various factors,
such as tax legislation and the geographic composition of our
pre-tax income. We carefully monitor these factors and timely
adjust our effective income tax rate accordingly.
35
Discontinued
Operations
On October 15, 2010, we completed the sale of our gas flow
control business, which includes the
Aera®
mass flow control and related product lines to Hitachi Metals,
Ltd., for $43.3 million. Assets and liabilities sold
include, without limitation, inventory, real property in
Hachioji, Japan, equipment, certain contracts, intellectual
property rights related to the gas flow control business and
certain warranty liability obligations. During the fourth
quarter of 2010, we recorded a $12.5 million gain on the
asset disposition, net of $1.7 million in taxes. The
results of continuing operations were reduced by the revenue and
costs associated with the gas flow control business which are
included in the Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations, net
of taxes, in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
SEGMENT
REPORTING IN FISCAL 2011
The combination of PV Powereds solar inverter product line
with our Solaron inverter product line resulted in revenue
growth, both in absolute dollars and as a percentage of our
overall revenue. Serving the inverter market has proven to
require management, marketing, sales and engineering efforts
that are uniquely different from those of our traditional
thin-film capital equipment market. As a result, management has
announced the creation of two focused business units within the
Company effective January 1, 2011. The two business units,
Thin Films Deposition Power Conversion and Thermal
Instrumentation (Thin Films) and Renewable Power
Inverters (Renewables), will enable improved
execution and a strategic focus on two distinct markets.
The Thin Films business unit will principally serve our OEM and
end customers in the semiconductor, flat panel display, solar
module and other capital equipment markets, while the Renewables
business unit will focus on residential, commercial and
utility-scale solar projects and installations, selling
primarily to distributors, Engineering, Procurement, and
Construction contractors (EPCs ), developers, and
utility companies. The creation of these two units will enable
greater focus on each business unique needs and
requirements, allowing each to expand and accelerate our growth
by better serving each of these very different industries.
Due to the structure of our internal organization, the design of
our internal systems and the manner in which expenses were
tracked and managed, we are unable to recast our financial
statements by operating segment for 2010 and prior without
significant cost and effort. Therefore, segment information
based on the two new business units for 2008, 2009 and 2010 has
not been reported as it is impracticable to do so.
36
QUARTERLY
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following tables present unaudited quarterly results in
dollars and as a percentage of sales for each of the eight
quarters in the period ended December 31, 2010. We believe
that all necessary adjustments have been included in the amounts
stated below to present fairly such quarterly information. Due
to the volatility of the industries in which our customers
operate, the operating results for any quarter are not
necessarily indicative of results for any subsequent period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2010
|
|
|
Sept. 30, 2010
|
|
|
Jun. 30, 2010
|
|
|
Mar. 31, 2010
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2009
|
|
|
Sept. 30, 2009
|
|
|
Jun. 30, 2009
|
|
|
Mar. 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
148,653
|
|
|
$
|
140,966
|
|
|
$
|
100,107
|
|
|
$
|
69,687
|
|
|
$
|
58,081
|
|
|
$
|
43,452
|
|
|
$
|
31,551
|
|
|
$
|
28,762
|
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
64,743
|
|
|
|
60,690
|
|
|
|
44,559
|
|
|
|
29,207
|
|
|
|
23,269
|
|
|
|
13,855
|
|
|
|
6,932
|
|
|
|
5,734
|
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
|
739
|
|
|
|
3,396
|
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,260
|
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
23,962
|
|
|
|
22,296
|
|
|
|
13,094
|
|
|
|
5,836
|
|
|
|
2,207
|
|
|
|
(5,630
|
)
|
|
|
(13,474
|
)
|
|
|
(80,243
|
)
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net
|
|
|
19,730
|
|
|
|
17,557
|
|
|
|
11,457
|
|
|
|
4,850
|
|
|
|
1,676
|
|
|
|
(8,352
|
)
|
|
|
(15,817
|
)
|
|
|
(79,319
|
)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net
|
|
|
11,678
|
|
|
|
2,392
|
|
|
|
2,162
|
|
|
|
1,367
|
|
|
|
(153
|
)
|
|
|
(79
|
)
|
|
|
(217
|
)
|
|
|
(444
|
)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
31,408
|
|
|
|
19,949
|
|
|
|
13,619
|
|
|
|
6,217
|
|
|
|
1,523
|
|
|
|
(8,431
|
)
|
|
|
(16,034
|
)
|
|
|
(79,763
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per Share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.12
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.89
|
)
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.40
|
|
|
$
|
0.26
|
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.89
|
)
|
Discontinued Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.06
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.27
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.05
|
|
|
$
|
0.03
|
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.00
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.01
|
)
|
Net Income (Loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.73
|
|
|
$
|
0.46
|
|
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.90
|
)
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
0.72
|
|
|
$
|
0.45
|
|
|
$
|
0.31
|
|
|
$
|
0.15
|
|
|
$
|
0.04
|
|
|
$
|
(0.20
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.38
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1.90
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2010
|
|
|
Sept. 30, 2010
|
|
|
Jun. 30, 2010
|
|
|
Mar. 31, 2010
|
|
|
Dec. 31, 2009
|
|
|
Sept. 30, 2009
|
|
|
Jun. 30, 2009
|
|
|
Mar. 31, 2009
|
|
|
Percentage of Sales:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Gross Profit
|
|
|
43.6
|
%
|
|
|
43.1
|
%
|
|
|
44.5
|
%
|
|
|
41.9
|
%
|
|
|
40.1
|
%
|
|
|
31.9
|
%
|
|
|
22.0
|
%
|
|
|
19.9
|
%
|
Restructuring
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.5
|
%
|
|
|
2.3
|
%
|
|
|
11.8
|
%
|
Goodwill impairment
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
219.9
|
%
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
|
16.1
|
%
|
|
|
15.8
|
%
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
|
|
(13.0
|
%)
|
|
|
(42.7
|
%)
|
|
|
(279.0
|
%)
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net
|
|
|
13.3
|
%
|
|
|
12.5
|
%
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
7.0
|
%
|
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
|
|
(19.2
|
%)
|
|
|
(50.1
|
%)
|
|
|
(275.8
|
%)
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net
|
|
|
7.9
|
%
|
|
|
1.7
|
%
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.0
|
%
|
|
|
(0.3
|
%)
|
|
|
(0.2
|
%)
|
|
|
(0.7
|
%)
|
|
|
(1.5
|
%)
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
21.1
|
%
|
|
|
14.2
|
%
|
|
|
13.6
|
%
|
|
|
8.9
|
%
|
|
|
2.6
|
%
|
|
|
(19.4
|
%)
|
|
|
(50.8
|
%)
|
|
|
(277.3
|
%)
|
Impact of
Inflation
In recent years, inflation has not had a significant impact on
our operations. However, we continuously monitor operating price
increases, particularly in connection with the supply of
component parts used in our manufacturing process. To the extent
permitted by competition, we pass increased costs on to our
customers by increasing sales prices over time. Sales price
increases, however, were not significant in any of the years
presented herein.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
LIQUIDITY
Our ability to fund our operations, acquisitions, capital
expenditures and product development efforts will depend on our
ability to generate cash from operating activities which is
subject to future operating performance as well as general
economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and
other conditions, some of which may be beyond our control. Our
primary sources of liquidity are our available cash, investments
and cash generated from current operations. We have no line of
credit or other external sources of liquidity.
At December 31, 2010, we had $140.6 million in cash,
cash equivalents and marketable securities. We believe that
adequate liquidity and cash generation will be important to the
execution of our strategic initiatives. We believe that our
current cash levels and our cash flows from future operations
will be adequate to meet anticipated working capital needs,
anticipated levels of capital expenditures and contractual
obligations for the next twelve months.
37
CASH
FLOWS
A summary of our cash provided by and used in operating,
investing and financing activities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
$
|
18,342
|
|
|
$
|
9,190
|
|
|
$
|
24,077
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(16,710
|
)
|
|
|
12,958
|
|
|
|
44,497
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
1,378
|
|
|
|
(3,395
|
)
|
|
|
(47,879
|
)
|
Effect of currency translation on cash
|
|
|
(5,202
|
)
|
|
|
(2,095
|
)
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(2,192
|
)
|
|
|
16,658
|
|
|
|
21,860
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the year
|
|
|
133,106
|
|
|
|
116,448
|
|
|
|
94,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period
|
|
$
|
130,914
|
|
|
$
|
133,106
|
|
|
$
|
116,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010 CASH
FLOWS COMPARED TO 2009
Net cash
provided by operating activities
Net cash provided by operating activities for the twelve months
ended December 31, 2010 was $18.3 million, compared to
$9.2 million for the same period ended December 31,
2009. The $9.1 million increase in net cash flows from
operating activities was largely due to a $173.9 million
increase in net income between 2010 and 2009. We used cash from
operations to invest in inventory to support the significant
growth of our sales. The increase in accounts payable from
December 31, 2009 to December 31, 2010 was due to a
large increase in sales and purchasing volume in the fourth
quarter of 2010 when compared to the much slower fourth quarter
of 2009.
Net cash
flows provided by (used in) investing activities
Net cash flows provided by (used in) investing activities
changed by $29.7 million to a $16.7 million use of
cash during the year ended December 31, 2010 as compared to
a $13.0 million source of cash provided by investing
activities for the same period during 2009. During the year
ended December 31, 2010, we converted a net
$34.5 million of marketable securities to cash, we
purchased PV Powered paying approximately $75.6 million in
net cash, we sold our gas flow control business for
$43.3 million in cash, and we spent $18.9 million for
capital expenditures. We intend to continue to acquire testing
equipment to sustain our engineering and new product development
efforts as well as capacity expansion for the production of
inverters, which will increase as a result of our acquisition of
PV Powered. Future capital expenditures are expected to be
funded through cash flows from operations.
During the twelve months ended December 31, 2009, we
generated a total of $13.0 million of cash flows from
investing activities due to $18.6 million in net sales of
marketable securities, offset by the purchase of
$5.6 million of capital equipment. Capital expenditures in
2010 and 2009 primarily include the cost of lab and testing
equipment to support sustaining engineering and new product
development efforts as well as capacity expansion for the
production of our
Solaron®
Inverter.
Net cash
flows provided by (used in) financing activities
Net cash flows provided by (used in) financing activities
increased by $4.8 million compared to 2009. During the year
ended December 31, 2010, we received $1.4 million for
the exercise of stock options, net of related transaction costs,
as compared to $0.5 million of stock options in the same
period in 2009.
38
2009 CASH
FLOWS COMPARED TO 2008
Net cash
provided by operating activities
Net cash provided by operating activities during the twelve
months ended December 31, 2009 was $9.2 million,
compared to $24.1 million of cash provided by operating
activities during the twelve months ended December 31,
2008. The $14.9 million decrease in net cash flows from
operating activities was due to a $100.9 million decrease
in net income, offset by a $50.2 million net increase in
non-cash reconciling items such as goodwill impairment,
depreciation and amortization, stock-based compensation,
restructuring charges, and our provision for deferred income
taxes. In addition, in 2009, we had a $35.8 million net
increase in cash flows from changes in operating assets and
liabilities, principally the depletion of inventory and cash
retained from an increase in accounts payable. The increase in
accounts payable from December 31, 2008 as compared to
December 31, 2009 was primarily the result of our decision
to extend payment terms to our vendors.
Net cash
flows provided by investing activities
Net cash flows provided by investing activities decreased
$31.5 million in 2009 as compared to 2008 mainly due to a
$33.1 million decrease in net proceeds from the sale of
marketable securities. During 2008, our $51.7 million in
net proceeds from the sale of marketable securities was used to
help us finance the $49.8 million buy-back of our common
shares during 2008.
Net cash
flows used in financing activities
Our net cash used in financing activities was $3.4 million
in 2009 as compared to $47.9 million in 2008. In 2009, we
incurred a $3.8 million cash outflow applicable to our
excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation with no
comparable transaction in 2008. In 2008, our $47.9 million
net cash used in financing activities was mainly due to the
repurchase of our common shares.
Effect of
currency translation on cash
The net effect of foreign currency translations on cash changed
$3.1 million to a $5.2 million negative impact for the
year ended December 31, 2010 compared to a
$2.1 million negative impact for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The effect of currency translation on
cash changed $3.3 million to a $2.1 million negative
impact for the year ended December 31, 2009 compared to a
$1.2 million positive impact for the year ended
December 31, 2008.
The functional currencies of our worldwide operations primarily
include U.S. dollar (USD), Japanese Yen
(JPY), Chinese Yuan (CNY), New Taiwan
Dollar (NTD), South Korean Won (KWN),
British Pound (GBP) and Euro (EUR). Our
purchasing and sales activities are primarily denominated in
USD, JPY, CNY and EUR. The change in these key currency rates
during the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
From
|
|
To
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
CNY
|
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
3.4
|
%
|
|
|
(0.1
|
)%
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
|
EUR
|
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
(7.2
|
%)
|
|
|
3.5
|
%
|
|
|
(5.4
|
%)
|
|
JPY
|
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
13.7
|
%
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
|
|
23.7
|
%
|
|
KWN
|
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
|
(25.8
|
%)
|
|
NTD
|
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
|
(0.7
|
%)
|
|
GBP
|
|
|
|
USD
|
|
|
|
(4.3
|
%)
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
|
|
(26.8
|
%)
|
Off
Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements or variable interest
entities.
39
Contractual
Obligations
The following table sets forth our future payments due under
contractual obligations as of December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
More than 5
|
|
Contractual
Obligations:
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
1 year
|
|
|
1 -3 years
|
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
|
years
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations
|
|
|
$
|
22,940
|
|
|
$
|
5,894
|
|
|
$
|
9,884
|
|
|
$
|
6,455
|
|
|
$
|
707
|
|
Purchase obligations
|
|
|
|
63,514
|
|
|
|
63,514
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
$
|
86,454
|
|
|
$
|
69,408
|
|
|
$
|
9,884
|
|
|
|
6,455
|
|
|
$
|
707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our purchase obligations include $0.6 million applicable to
capital additions.
As of December 31, 2010, we have $14.2 million in
uncertain tax positions, net of federal benefit. Because of the
uncertainty of the amounts to be ultimately paid as well as the
timing of such payments, these liabilities are not reflected in
the contractual obligations table. Purchase obligations include
firm commitments and agreements with various suppliers to ensure
the availability of components.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) or other standards setting bodies issue new
accounting pronouncements. Updates to the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC) are communicated
through issuance of an Accounting Standards Update
(ASU). Unless otherwise discussed, we believe that
the impact of recently issued guidance, whether adopted or to be
adopted in the future, is not expected to have a material impact
on our Consolidated Financial Statements upon adoption.
To understand the impact of recently issued guidance, whether
adopted or to be adopted, please review the information provided
in our Note 1 Operations and Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates to our
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of
this
Form 10-K.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Market
Risk and Risk Management
In the normal course of business, we have exposures to interest
rate risk from our investments and foreign exchange rate risk
related to our foreign operations and foreign currency
transactions.
Interest
Rate Risk
Our market risk exposure relates to changes in interest rates in
our investment portfolio. We generally place our investments
with high-credit quality issuers and by policy are averse to
principal loss and seek to protect and preserve our invested
funds by limiting default risk, market risk and reinvestment
risk. As of December 31, 2010, our investments consisted
primarily of treasury bills, certificates of deposit, corporate
bonds, agency bonds and institutional money markets, all with
maturity of less than 1 year.
As a measurement of the sensitivity of our portfolio and
assuming that our investment portfolio balances remain constant,
a hypothetical decrease of 100 basis points (1%) in
interest rates would decrease annual pre-tax earnings by
approximately $0.1 million.
Foreign
Currency Exchange Rate Risk
We are impacted by changes in foreign currency exchange rates
through sales and purchasing transactions when we sell product
and purchase materials in currencies different from the currency
in which product and manufacturing costs were incurred. The
functional currencies of our worldwide facilities primarily
include the USD, EUR, KWN, NTD, GBP, and CNY. Our purchasing and
sales activities are primarily denominated in the USD, EUR and
CNY. We may be impacted by changes in the relative buying power
of our customers, which may impact sales volumes either
positively or negatively. As these currencies fluctuate
40
against each other, and other currencies, we are exposed to
foreign currency exchange rate risk on sales, purchasing
transactions and labor.
From time to time, we enter into foreign currency exchange rate
contracts to hedge against changes in foreign currency exchange
rates on assets and liabilities expected to be settled at a
future date. Market risk arises from the potential adverse
effects on the value of derivative instruments that result from
a change in foreign currency exchange rates. We did not execute
foreign currency forward exchange rate contract transactions in
2010 or 2009, but we may consider investing in such contracts
during 2011. We minimize our market risk applicable to foreign
currency exchange rate contracts by establishing and monitoring
parameters that limit the types and degree of our derivative
contract instruments. We enter into derivative contract
instruments for risk management purposes only. We do not enter
into or issue derivatives for trading or speculative purposes.
Our reported financial results of operations, including the
reported value of our assets and liabilities, are also impacted
by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Assets and
liabilities of substantially all of our subsidiaries outside the
U.S. are translated at period end rates of exchange for
each reporting period. Operating results and cash flow
statements are translated at weighted-average rates of exchange
during each reporting period. Although these translation changes
have no immediate cash impact, the translation changes may
impact future borrowing capacity, and overall value of our net
assets.
Currency exchange rates vary daily and often one currency
strengthens against the USD while another currency weakens.
Because of the complex interrelationship of the worldwide supply
chains and distribution channels, it is difficult to quantify
the impact of a change in one or more particular exchange rates.
41
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Advanced
Energy Industries, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and
subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) as of
December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders equity, and cash
flows for each of the three years in the period ended
December 31, 2010. These financial statements are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are
free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a
test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the
accounting principles used and significant estimates made by
management, as well as evaluating the overall financial
statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred
to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial
position of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries as
of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the results of their
operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in
the period ended December 31, 2010, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and subsidiaries internal
control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2010,
based on criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) and our
report dated March 2, 2011, expressed an unqualified
opinion and exclusion of PV Powered, Inc.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 2, 2011
43
REPORT OF
INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Board of Directors and Shareholders
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
We have audited Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. (a Delaware
Corporation) and subsidiaries (collectively, the
Company) internal control over financial reporting
as of December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO). The Companys management is responsible
for maintaining effective internal control over financial
reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of
internal control over financial reporting, included in the
accompanying Managements Report on Internal Control
over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A of the
Companys Annual Report on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2010
(Managements Report). Our responsibility is to
express an opinion on the Companys internal control over
financial reporting based on our audit. Our audit of, and
opinion on, the Companys internal control over financial
reporting does not include internal control over financial
reporting of PV Powered, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary, whose
financial statements reflect total assets and revenues
constituting 29% and 14%, respectively, of the related
consolidated financial statement amounts as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2010. As indicated in
Managements Report, PV Powered, Inc. was acquired
during 2010 and therefore, managements assertion on the
effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting excluded internal control over financial
reporting of PV Powered, Inc.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those
standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control
over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of
internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk
that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on
the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of
financial statements for external purposes in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles. A companys
internal control over financial reporting includes those
policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance
of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly
reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions
are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial
statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of
management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
companys assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risk that controls may become
inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree
of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and
subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective
internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2010, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework issued
by COSO.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the
consolidated balance sheets of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2010 and 2009, and the
related consolidated statements of operations,
stockholders equity, and cash flows for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2010, and our report
dated March 2, 2011, expressed an unqualified opinion.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
Denver, Colorado
March 2, 2011
44
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except per share
amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
130,914
|
|
|
$
|
133,106
|
|
Marketable securities
|
|
|
9,640
|
|
|
|
44,401
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $3,440 and $1,975,
respectively
|
|
|
119,893
|
|
|
|
50,267
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
77,593
|
|
|
|
28,567
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
7,510
|
|
|
|
9,222
|
|
Income taxes receivable
|
|
|
6,061
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets of business held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
26,460
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
10,156
|
|
|
|
5,641
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
361,767
|
|
|
|
297,664
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
34,569
|
|
|
|
18,687
|
|
Deposits and other
|
|
|
8,874
|
|
|
|
9,295
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
48,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets, net
|
|
|
48,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
3,166
|
|
|
|
19,479
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
505,157
|
|
|
$
|
345,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
56,185
|
|
|
$
|
23,802
|
|
Income taxes payable
|
|
|
3,602
|
|
|
|
3,503
|
|
Accrued payroll and employee benefits
|
|
|
23,202
|
|
|
|
6,118
|
|
Accrued warranty expense
|
|
|
7,144
|
|
|
|
7,005
|
|
Other accrued expenses
|
|
|
5,389
|
|
|
|
4,277
|
|
Customer deposits
|
|
|
6,803
|
|
|
|
3,152
|
|
Liabilities of business held for sale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
102,325
|
|
|
|
49,334
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
5,155
|
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
Uncertain tax positions
|
|
|
14,176
|
|
|
|
14,987
|
|
Accrued warranty expense
|
|
|
5,805
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
3,728
|
|
|
|
1,270
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
|
131,189
|
|
|
|
66,791
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 1,000 shares
authorized, none issued
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 70,000 shares
authorized; 43,330 and 42,044
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
shares issued and outstanding, respectively
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
258,398
|
|
|
|
233,623
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
88,453
|
|
|
|
17,261
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
|
27,074
|
|
|
|
27,408
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity
|
|
|
373,968
|
|
|
|
278,334
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity
|
|
$
|
505,157
|
|
|
$
|
345,125
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Consolidated Financial Statements.
45
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share
amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
SALES
|
|
$
|
459,414
|
|
|
$
|
161,846
|
|
|
$
|
285,166
|
|
COST OF SALES
|
|
|
260,215
|
|
|
|
112,056
|
|
|
|
175,596
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
GROSS PROFIT
|
|
|
199,199
|
|
|
|
49,790
|
|
|
|
109,570
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
56,604
|
|
|
|
41,132
|
|
|
|
52,125
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
74,543
|
|
|
|
38,040
|
|
|
|
48,241
|
|
Impairment of goodwill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of intangible assets
|
|
|
2,864
|
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
|
462
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,376
|
|
|
|
3,487
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
134,011
|
|
|
|
146,930
|
|
|
|
104,315
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
|
65,188
|
|
|
|
(97,140
|
)
|
|
|
5,255
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
1,371
|
|
|
|
4,955
|
|
Other income (expense), net
|
|
|
1,682
|
|
|
|
539
|
|
|
|
(2,072
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other income
|
|
|
2,221
|
|
|
|
1,910
|
|
|
|
2,883
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
|
|
|
67,409
|
|
|
|
(95,230
|
)
|
|
|
8,138
|
|
Provision for income taxes
|
|
|
13,816
|
|
|
|
6,582
|
|
|
|
14,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) FROM CONTINUING OPERATIONS, NET OF INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
53,593
|
|
|
|
(101,812
|
)
|
|
|
(6,501
|
)
|
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
12,531
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
|
5,068
|
|
|
|
(893
|
)
|
|
|
4,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME (LOSS) FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET OF INCOME TAXES
|
|
|
17,599
|
|
|
|
(893
|
)
|
|
|
4,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
$
|
71,192
|
|
|
$
|
(102,705
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,779
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted-average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
42,862
|
|
|
|
41,966
|
|
|
|
42,537
|
|
Diluted weighted-average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
43,419
|
|
|
|
41,966
|
|
|
|
42,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONTINUING OPERATIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
$
|
(2.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
|
|
$
|
1.23
|
|
|
$
|
(2.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
|
|
$
|
0.41
|
|
|
$
|
(0.02
|
)
|
|
$
|
0.11
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME (LOSS):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BASIC EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
|
|
$
|
1.66
|
|
|
$
|
(2.45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE
|
|
$
|
1.64
|
|
|
$
|
(2.45
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.04
|
)
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
46
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders
Equity
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additional
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Paid-in
|
|
|
Retained
|
|
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Stockholders
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Earnings
|
|
|
Income
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
BALANCES, December 31, 2007
|
|
|
45,288
|
|
|
$
|
45
|
|
|
$
|
267,205
|
|
|
$
|
121,745
|
|
|
$
|
18,066
|
|
|
$
|
407,061
|
|
Stock issued from equity plans
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,610
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,610
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,094
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,094
|
|
Stock buyback
|
|
|
(3,775
|
)
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
(49,770
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,773
|
)
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity adjustment from foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,001
|
|
|
|
14,001
|
|
Unrealized holding gain
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
|
|
335
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,779
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,779
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCES, December 31, 2008
|
|
|
41,849
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
224,139
|
|
|
|
119,966
|
|
|
|
32,402
|
|
|
|
376,549
|
|
Stock issued from equity plans
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
146
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,766
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,766
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,818
|
|
Japan cash repatriation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(246
|
)
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity adjustment from foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,985
|
)
|
|
|
(4,985
|
)
|
Unrealized holding losses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102,705
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(102,705
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(107,699
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCES, December 31, 2009
|
|
|
42,044
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
233,623
|
|
|
|
17,261
|
|
|
|
27,408
|
|
|
|
278,334
|
|
Stock issued from equity plans
|
|
|
288
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,397
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,397
|
|
Stock issued for acquisition of PV Powered
|
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
14,689
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,690
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,501
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
188
|
|
Comprehensive income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity adjustment from foreign currency translation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(343
|
)
|
|
|
(343
|
)
|
Unrealized holding gains (losses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
9
|
|
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
71,192
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
70,858
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BALANCES, December 31, 2010
|
|
|
43,330
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
258,398
|
|
|
$
|
88,453
|
|
|
$
|
27,074
|
|
|
$
|
373,968
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an
integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
47
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
71,192
|
|
|
$
|
(102,705
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,779
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided
by operating activities, net of assets and liabilities acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
10,736
|
|
|
|
9,014
|
|
|
|
10,718
|
|
Goodwill impairment charge
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
63,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based compensation expense
|
|
|
8,501
|
|
|
|
5,766
|
|
|
|
5,094
|
|
Provision (benefit) for deferred income taxes
|
|
|
5,284
|
|
|
|
(5,283
|
)
|
|
|
7,927
|
|
Restructuring charges
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,376
|
|
|
|
3,487
|
|
Net gain on disposal of gas flow control business
|
|
|
(12,531
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss on disposal of assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
323
|
|
|
|
19
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of assets
acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
(62,136
|
)
|
|
|
7,053
|
|
|
|
9,596
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(41,299
|
)
|
|
|
11,175
|
|
|
|
3,437
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
(6,318
|
)
|
|
|
(1,573
|
)
|
|
|
370
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
26,519
|
|
|
|
15,797
|
|
|
|
(4,596
|
)
|
Other current liabilities and accrued expenses
|
|
|
27,163
|
|
|
|
1,726
|
|
|
|
(3,217
|
)
|
Income taxes
|
|
|
(9,188
|
)
|
|
|
5,364
|
|
|
|
(2,615
|
)
|
Non-current assets
|
|
|
469
|
|
|
|
(4,785
|
)
|
|
|
(2,269
|
)
|
Non-current liabilities
|
|
|
(50
|
)
|
|
|
(318
|
)
|
|
|
(2,095
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
18,342
|
|
|
|
9,190
|
|
|
|
24,077
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of marketable securities
|
|
|
(109,516
|
)
|
|
|
(247,017
|
)
|
|
|
(439,091
|
)
|
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities
|
|
|
144,055
|
|
|
|
265,586
|
|
|
|
490,790
|
|
Proceeds from sale of gas flow control business
|
|
|
43,260
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of PV Powered, Inc., net of cash acquired
|
|
|
(75,577
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(18,932
|
)
|
|
|
(5,611
|
)
|
|
|
(7,202
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
(16,710
|
)
|
|
|
12,958
|
|
|
|
44,497
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on capital lease obligations
|
|
|
(209
|
)
|
|
|
(85
|
)
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
Purchase and retirement of treasury stock
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(49,767
|
)
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
|
|
1,397
|
|
|
|
508
|
|
|
|
2,008
|
|
Excess tax benefit from stock-based compensation deduction
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
(3,818
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
1,378
|
|
|
|
(3,395
|
)
|
|
|
(47,879
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EFFECT OF CURRENCY TRANSLATION ON CASH
|
|
|
(5,202
|
)
|
|
|
(2,095
|
)
|
|
|
1,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCREASE (DECREASE ) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
(2,192
|
)
|
|
|
16,658
|
|
|
|
21,860
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period
|
|
|
133,106
|
|
|
|
116,448
|
|
|
|
94,588
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
|
|
$
|
130,914
|
|
|
$
|
133,106
|
|
|
$
|
116,448
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
55
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
|
25,182
|
|
|
|
6,355
|
|
|
|
6,052
|
|
Cash received for refunds of income taxes
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash held in banks outside the United States
|
|
|
22,032
|
|
|
|
66,148
|
|
|
|
73,516
|
|
NONCASH TRANSACTIONS:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock issued as partial consideration for PV Powered
acquisition
|
|
$
|
14,690
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
Consolidated Financial Statements.
48
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
In this Annual Report on
Form 10-K,
we use the terms Advanced Energy, we,
our, and us to refer to Advanced Energy
Industries, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
NOTE 1.
OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND
ESTIMATES
We design, manufacture, sell and support power conversion
products that transform power into various usable forms. Our
products enable manufacturing processes that use thin-film
deposition for various products, such as semiconductor devices,
flat panel displays, solar panels and architectural glass. We
also supply thermal instrumentation products for advanced
temperature control in the thin-film process for these same
markets. Our solar inverter products support renewable power
generation solutions for residential, commercial and
utility-scale solar projects and installations. Our network of
global service support centers offer repair services,
conversions, upgrades and refurbishments to companies using our
products. We also offer a wide variety of operations and
maintenance service plans that can be tailored for individual
photovoltaic (PV) sites of all sizes.
Principles of Consolidation Our
Consolidated Financial Statements include our accounts and the
accounts of our wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Our Consolidated
Financial Statements are stated in United States dollars and
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States
(U.S. GAAP).
Use of Estimates in the Preparation of the Consolidated
Financial Statements The preparation of
our consolidated financial statements in conformity with
U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates, assumptions and
judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. We believe
that the significant estimates, assumptions and judgments when
accounting for items and matters such as allowances for doubtful
accounts, excess and obsolete inventory, warranty reserves,
acquisitions, asset valuations, asset life, depreciation,
amortization, recoverability of assets, impairments, deferred
revenue, stock option and restricted stock grants, taxes, and
other provisions are reasonable, based upon information
available at the time they are made. Actual results may differ
from these estimates, making it possible that a change in these
estimates could occur in the near term.
Reclassifications We have reclassified
certain amounts in our 2009 and 2008 Consolidated Financial
Statements to reflect assets held for sale and discontinued
operations. These reclassifications had no impact on our
financial position or results of operations.
Foreign Currency Translation The
functional currency of our foreign subsidiaries is their local
currency, with the exception of our manufacturing facility in
Shenzhen, The Peoples Republic of China (PRC) where
the United States dollar is the functional currency. Assets and
liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated to United
States dollars at period-end exchange rates, and our
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Cash Flows are
translated at average exchange rates during the period.
Resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a separate
component of stockholders equity.
Transactions denominated in currencies other than the local
currency are recorded based on exchange rates at the time such
transactions arise. Subsequent changes in exchange rates result
in foreign currency transaction gains and losses which are
reflected in income as unrealized (based on period end
translation) or realized (upon settlement of the transactions).
Fair Value of Financial
Instruments We value our financial
assets and liabilities using fair value measurements. Fair value
is based on the price that would be received to sell an asset or
paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between
market participants at the measurement date. The carrying amount
of cash and cash equivalents, marketable securities, accounts
receivable, other current assets, accounts payable,
49
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
accrued liabilities and other current liabilities in our
Consolidated Financial Statements approximates fair value
because of the short-term nature of the instruments.
Cash and Cash Equivalents We consider
all amounts on deposit with financial institutions and highly
liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or
less to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are
highly liquid investments that consist primarily of short-term
money market instruments and demand deposits with insignificant
interest rate risk and original maturities of three months or
less at the time of purchase.
Sometimes we invest excess cash in money market funds not
insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. We believe
that the investments in money market funds are on deposit with
credit worthy financial institutions and that the funds are
highly liquid. The investments in money market funds are
reported at fair value, with interest income recorded in
earnings and are included in Cash and cash
equivalents. The fair values of our investments in money
market funds are based on the quoted market prices.
Marketable Securities All of our
investments in marketable securities are classified as
available-for-sale
at the respective balance sheet dates. Marketable securities
classified as
available-for-sale
are recorded at fair value based upon quoted market prices, and
any temporary difference between the cost and fair value of the
investment is presented as a separate component of accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss). We recognize gains and losses
on the date our investments mature or are sold and record these
gains and losses in other income, net. The specific
identification method is used to determine the gains and losses
on investments in marketable securities.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
Financial instruments, which potentially subject us to
credit risk, include cash and cash equivalents, marketable
securities and trade accounts receivable. To preserve capital
and maintain liquidity, we invest with financial institutions we
deem to be of high quality and sound financial condition. Our
investments are in low-risk instruments and we limit our credit
exposure in any one institution or type of investment instrument
based upon criteria including creditworthiness.
At December 31, 2010, our accounts receivable from ULVAC,
Inc. were $13.0 million comprising 10.5% of our total
accounts receivable. At December 31, 2009, our accounts
receivable from Applied Materials, Inc. were $8.2 million
comprising 15.6% of our total accounts receivable. No other
customer balance exceeded 10% of our total accounts receivable
balance at December 31, 2010 and 2009. We have established
an allowance for doubtful accounts based upon factors
surrounding the credit risk of specific customers, historical
trends and other information.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful
Accounts Accounts receivable are recorded at
net realizable value. We maintain a credit approval process and
we make significant judgments in connection with assessing our
customers ability to pay at the time of shipment. Despite
this assessment, from time to time, our customers are unable to
meet their payment obligations. We continuously monitor our
customers credit worthiness and use our judgment in
establishing a provision for estimated credit losses based upon
our historical experience and any specific customer collection
issues that we have identified. While such credit losses have
historically been within our expectations and the provisions
established, there is no assurance that we will continue to
experience the same credit loss rates that we have in the past.
A significant change in the liquidity or financial position of
our customers could have a material adverse impact on the
collectability of accounts receivable and our future operating
results.
50
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Changes in allowance for doubtful accounts are summarized as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance beginning of period
|
|
$
|
1,975
|
|
|
$
|
971
|
|
|
$
|
360
|
|
Additions charged to expense
|
|
|
1,814
|
|
|
|
2,822
|
|
|
|
1,654
|
|
Deductions write-offs, net or recoveries
|
|
|
(349
|
)
|
|
|
(1,818
|
)
|
|
|
(1,043
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance end of period
|
|
$
|
3,440
|
|
|
$
|
1,975
|
|
|
$
|
971
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories Inventories include costs
of materials, direct labor, manufacturing overhead, in-bound
freight and duty. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost
(first-in,
first-out method) or market and are presented net of reserves
for excess and obsolete inventory.
Reserves are provided for excess and obsolete inventory. We
regularly review inventory quantities on hand and record a
provision to write-down excess and obsolete inventory to its
estimated net realizable value, if less than cost, based
primarily on our estimated forecast of product demand. Demand
for our products can fluctuate significantly. A significant
decrease in demand could result in an increase in the charges
for excess inventory quantities on hand.
In addition, our industry is subject to technological change,
new product development and product technological obsolescence
that could result in an increase in the amount of obsolete
inventory quantities on hand. Therefore, any significant
unanticipated changes in demand or technological developments
could have a significant impact on the value of our inventory
and our reported operating results.
Property and Equipment Property and
equipment is stated at cost or estimated fair value if acquired
in a business combination. Depreciation is computed using the
straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Buildings
|
|
20 to 40 years
|
|
|
Machinery, equipment, furniture and fixtures and vehicles
|
|
3 to 10 years
|
|
|
Computer and communication equipment
|
|
3 years
|
Amortization of leasehold improvements and leased equipment is
calculated using the straight-line method over the lease term or
the estimated useful life of the assets, whichever period is
shorter. Additions, improvements, and major renewals are
capitalized, while maintenance, repairs and minor renewals are
expensed as incurred. When depreciable assets are retired, or
otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated
depreciation are removed from the accounts and any related gains
or losses are included in other income, net, in our Consolidated
Statements of Operations.
Intangible Assets, Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Assets
We completed our acquisition of PV Powered
in May 2010 for a total cost of $90.3 million. As a result
of our acquisition, we identified and recorded intangible assets
and goodwill. Intangible assets are valued based on estimates of
future cash flows and amortized over their estimated useful
lives. Goodwill is subject to annual impairment testing as well
as testing upon the occurrence of any event that indicates a
potential impairment. Intangible assets and other long-lived
assets are subject to an impairment test if there is an
indicator of impairment. The carrying value and ultimate
realization of these assets is dependent upon our estimates of
future earnings and benefits that we expect to generate from
their use. If our expectations of future results and cash flows
are significantly diminished, intangible assets and goodwill may
be impaired and the resulting charge to operations may be
material. When we determine that the carrying value of
intangibles or other long-lived assets may not be recoverable
based upon the existence of one or more indicators of
impairment, we use the projected
51
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
undiscounted cash flow method to determine whether an impairment
exists, and then measure the impairment using discounted cash
flows.
The estimation of useful lives and expected cash flows require
us to make significant judgments regarding future periods that
are subject to some factors outside of our control. Changes in
these estimates can result in significant revisions to our
carrying value of these assets and may result in material
charges to our results of operations.
To measure impairment for goodwill, we compare the fair value of
our reporting units by measuring discounted cash flows to the
book value of the reporting units. Goodwill would be impaired if
the resulting implied fair value of goodwill was less than the
recorded book value of the goodwill. We perform a goodwill
impairment analysis using the two-step method on an annual basis
as of October 31 and whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of goodwill may not be
recoverable. The recoverability of goodwill is measured by
comparing the carrying amount of the applicable reporting unit,
including goodwill, to its fair market value.
Based upon a combination of factors, including a significant
decline in our market capitalization below our carrying value,
the deteriorating macro-economic environment, which had resulted
in a significant decline in customer demand, and illiquidity in
the overall credit markets, we performed an interim goodwill
impairment analysis at February 28, 2009. Based on our
market capitalization, an average weighting of both projected
discounted future cash flows, the use of comparative market
multiples and relative control premiums, we determined that our
goodwill was potentially impaired. We performed the second step
of the goodwill impairment analysis which involves allocating
the overall estimated fair value of the Company to all of our
assets and liabilities other than goodwill and determined that
our goodwill was fully impaired. In March 2009, we recorded a
non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $63.3 million, and
as a result, we had no goodwill as of December 31, 2009.
Revenue Recognition We recognize
revenue from product sales upon transfer of title and risk of
loss to our customers provided that there is evidence of an
arrangement, the sales price is fixed or determinable and the
collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured. In
most transactions, we have no obligations to our customers after
the date products are shipped other than pursuant to warranty
obligations. For customers purchasing our Renewables products,
we provide installation, support and services after the product
has been shipped. We defer the fair value of any undelivered
elements until the undelivered element is delivered. Fair value
is the price charged when the element is sold separately.
Shipping and handling fees billed to customers, if any, are
recognized as revenue. The related shipping and handling costs
are recognized in cost of sales.
We maintain a worldwide support organization in seven countries,
including the United States, the PRC, Japan, Korea, Taiwan,
Germany and England. Support services include warranty and
non-warranty repair services, upgrades and refurbishments on the
products we sell. Revenue from repairs and replacements that are
non-warranty in nature are recognized as the work is performed,
on a time and materials basis. Repairs that are covered under
our standard warranty do not generate revenue.
Arrangements that include multiple deliverables are evaluated to
determine whether the elements are separable based on objective
evidence. If the elements are deemed separable, total
consideration is allocated to each element and the revenue
associated with each element is recognized as earned. If the
elements are not deemed separable, total consideration is
deferred and recognized when all elements are delivered or, if
the agreement involves services, ratably over the longer of the
contractual period or the expected customer relationship period.
We also provide our customers with extended warranty and
preventive maintenance service contract options on the products
we sell. Any up-front fees received for extended warranties or
maintenance plans are deferred and recognized ratably over the
service periods as defined in the agreements. We deferred
revenue
52
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
related to extended warranties totaling $5.9 million as of
December 31, 2010 and $1.0 million as of
December 31, 2009, including the current portion.
Based on the credit worthiness of certain customers, we may
require payment prior to the manufacture or shipment of products
purchased by these customers. Cash payments received prior to
shipment are recorded as customer deposits and deferred revenue
and then recognized as revenue as appropriate based upon the
transfer of title to the products. We do not offer price
protection to customers, or allow returns, unless covered by our
normal policy for repair of defective products.
Customer
payments
We occasionally agree to make payments to certain customers in
order to participate in anticipated sales activity. Payments
made to customers are accounted for as a reduction of revenue
unless they are made in exchange for identifiable goods or
services with fair values that can be reasonably estimated.
These reductions in revenues are recognized immediately to the
extent that the payments cannot be attributed to anticipated
future sales, and are recognized in future periods to the extent
that the payments relate to future sales, based on the specific
facts and circumstances underlying each payment.
Taxes Collected from Customers In the
course of doing business we collect various taxes from customers
including, but not limited to, sales taxes and value added
taxes. It is our policy to record revenue net of taxes collected
from customers in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Shipping and Handling Costs Amounts
billed to customers for shipping and handling are recorded in
sales. Shipping and handling costs incurred by us for the
delivery of products to customers are included in cost of sales.
Advertising Costs Advertising costs
are expensed when incurred and are included in selling, general
and administrative expenses.
Research and Development Expenses
Costs incurred to advance, test or otherwise
modify our proprietary technology or develop new technologies
are considered research and development costs and are expensed
when incurred. These costs are primarily comprised of costs
associated with the operation of our laboratories and research
facilities, including internal labor, materials and overhead.
Warranty Costs We provide for the
estimated costs to fulfill customer warranty obligations upon
the recognition of the related revenue. We offer warranty
coverage for a majority of our thin-film products for periods
typically ranging from 12 to 24 months after shipment. We
warrant our solar inverter products for five to ten years. We
estimate the anticipated costs of repairing our products under
such warranties based on the historical costs of the repairs and
any known specific product issues. The assumptions we use to
estimate warranty accruals are reevaluated periodically in light
of actual experience product, configuration and geographic
region and, when appropriate, the accruals are adjusted based on
specific estimates of project repair costs and quantity of
product returns. Should product failure rates differ from our
estimates, actual costs could vary significantly from our
expectations.
Stock-Based Compensation Accounting
for stock-based compensation requires the measurement and
recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment
awards made to employees and directors based on estimated fair
values. We have estimated the fair value of stock options on the
date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton pricing model,
which is affected by our stock price as well as assumptions
regarding a number of complex and subjective variables. These
variables include our expected stock price volatility over the
term of the awards, actual and projected employee option
exercise behaviors, risk free interest rate and expected
dividends. We also estimate forfeitures at the time of grant and
revise those estimates in subsequent periods if actual
forfeitures differ from our estimates. Our expected volatility
assumption is based on our historical daily closing price of our
stock over a period equivalent to the expected life of the
options.
53
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Income Taxes We follow the liability
method of accounting for income taxes under which deferred tax
assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax
consequences. A deferred tax asset or liability is computed for
both the expected future impact of differences between the
financial statement and tax basis of assets and liabilities and
for the expected future tax benefit to be derived from tax loss
and tax credit carry-forwards. Valuation allowances are
established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to
the amount expected to be realized, based upon an assessment of
both negative and positive evidence, in future tax returns. Tax
rate changes are reflected in the period such changes are
enacted.
We assess the recoverability of our net deferred tax assets and
the need for a valuation allowance on a quarterly basis. Our
assessment includes a number of factors including historical
results and taxable income projections for each jurisdiction.
The ultimate realization of deferred income tax assets is
dependent on the generation of taxable income in appropriate
jurisdictions during the periods in which those temporary
differences are deductible. We consider the scheduled reversal
of deferred income tax liabilities, projected future taxable
income, and tax planning strategies in determining the amount of
the valuation allowance. Based on the level of historical
taxable income and projections for future taxable income over
the periods in which the deferred income tax assets are
deductible, we determine if we will realize the benefits of
these deductible differences.
Accounting for income taxes requires a two-step approach to
recognize and measure uncertain tax positions. In general, we
are subject to regular examination of our income tax returns by
the Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities. The
first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by
determining if, based on the technical merits, it is more likely
than not that the position will be sustained upon audit,
including resolutions of related appeals or litigation
processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit
as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely of being
realized upon ultimate settlement. We regularly assess the
likelihood of favorable or unfavorable outcomes resulting from
these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision
for income taxes. This evaluation is based on factors including,
but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes
in tax law, effectively settled issues under audit and new audit
activity.
Commitments and Contingencies From
time to time we are involved in disputes and legal actions
arising in the normal course of our business. While we currently
believe that the amount of any ultimate loss would not be
material to our financial position, the outcome of these actions
is inherently difficult to predict. In the event of an adverse
outcome, the ultimate loss could have a material adverse effect
on our financial position or reported results of operations in a
particular quarter. An unfavorable decision, particularly in
patent litigation, could require material changes in production
processes and products or result in our inability to ship
products or components found to have violated third-party patent
rights. We accrue loss contingencies when it is probable that a
loss has occurred or will occur and the amount of the loss can
be reasonably estimated. Our estimates of probability of losses
are subjective, involve significant judgment and uncertainties
and are based on the best information we have at any given point
in time. Resolution of these uncertainties in a manner
inconsistent with our expectations could have a significant
impact on our results of operations and financial condition.
NEW
ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
From time to time, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) or other standards setting bodies issue new
accounting pronouncements. Updates to the FASB Accounting
Standards Codification (ASC) are communicated
through issuance of an Accounting Standards Update
(ASU). Unless otherwise discussed, We believe that
the impact of recently issued guidance, whether adopted or to be
adopted in the future, is not expected to have a material impact
on the Consolidated Financial Statements upon adoption.
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) issued guidance to amend the disclosure
requirements related to fair value measurements. The guidance
requires new disclosures of
54
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
significant transfers in and out of Levels 1 and 2, the
reasons for the transfers, and separate reporting of purchases,
sales, issuances and settlements in the roll forward of
Level 3 activity. The guidance also clarifies that fair
value measurement disclosures should be provided for each class
of assets and liabilities and disclosures also should be
provided about Level 2 and Level 3 valuation
techniques and inputs used to measure fair value. This guidance
became effective for us January 1, 2010, except for
disclosures relating to purchases, sales, issuances and
settlements of Level 3 assets and liabilities, which will
be effective for us beginning January 1, 2011. As this
guidance only requires expanded disclosures, the adoption did
not and will not impact our consolidated financial position or
results of operations.
In October 2009, the FASB issued a pronouncement that
establishes the accounting and reporting guidance for
arrangements including multiple revenue-generating activities
and amends the criteria for separating deliverables and
measuring and allocating arrangement consideration to one or
more units of accounting. The amendments also establish a
selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a
deliverable. Significantly enhanced disclosures will be required
to provide information about a vendors
multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements, including information
about the nature and terms, significant deliverables, and its
performance within arrangements. The amendments also require
providing information about the significant judgments made,
changes to those judgments and about how the application of the
relative selling-price method affects the timing or amount of
revenue recognition. We adopted this new pronouncement
prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or
materially modified beginning January 1, 2011. The
implementation of this authoritative guidance is not expected to
have a material impact on our financial position or results of
operations.
In April 2010, the FASB provided guidance on defining a
milestone and determining when it may be appropriate to apply
the milestone method of revenue recognition for research and
development transactions, and requires certain disclosures
regarding the use of the milestone method. The required
disclosures must be provided for fiscal years beginning on or
after June 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those
fiscal years (fiscal year 2011 for us). We adopted this
authoritative guidance on January 1, 2011 and it is not
expected to have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial
Statements.
|
|
NOTE 2.
|
BUSINESS
ACQUISITION AND DISPOSITION
|
Acquisition
On May 3, 2010, we acquired PV Powered, a privately-held
Oregon corporation based in Bend, Oregon, pursuant to an
Agreement and Plan of Merger dated March 24, 2010 between
Advanced Energy, PV Powered and Neptune Acquisition Sub, Inc.
(Acquisition Sub), an Oregon corporation and
wholly-owned subsidiary of Advanced Energy, and Amendment
No. 1 to the Agreement and Plan of Merger dated
April 21, 2010 (together with the Agreement and Plan of
Merger, the Merger Agreement). Pursuant to the
Merger Agreement, Acquisition Sub merged with and into PV
Powered, with PV Powered being the surviving corporation and a
wholly-owned subsidiary of Advanced Energy (the
Merger or Acquisition).
We acquired all of the outstanding PV Powered common stock for
total consideration with a fair value of approximately
$90.3 million consisting of 1.0 million shares of
Advanced Energy common stock with a market value of
approximately $14.7 million and cash payments totaling
$75.6 million, net of cash acquired.
PV Powered is a leading manufacturer of grid-tied PV inverters
in the residential, commercial and utility-scale markets. PV
Powered manufactures high-reliability transformer-based PV
inverters utilized in residential, commercial roof top and
ground mount systems in the North American market. Its inverters
range in size from 30 kilowatts (kW) to two
megawatts for the commercial market and 1kW to 5kW for the
residential market, with market leading efficiency ratings.
PV Powered will continue to operate out of its facilities in
Bend, Oregon as a subsidiary of Advanced Energy. The acquisition
of PV Powered enables us to offer the solar inverter market a
more complete suite of
55
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
products in a wider power range and increases the number of
solar array opportunities for which our products can be
considered for purchase.
We recorded the acquisition of PV Powered using the acquisition
method of accounting and the purchase price was allocated to the
tangible assets, intangible assets and liabilities acquired
based on estimated fair values. The excess of the purchase price
(consideration transferred) over the respective fair values of
identifiable assets and liabilities acquired was recorded as
goodwill. The goodwill resulting from the acquisition is not tax
deductible. The purchase price allocation is not final as of
December 31, 2010, as we continue to evaluate the expected
value of the pre-acquisition net operating losses of PV Powered.
As of December 31, 2010, we had estimated the value of the
pre-acquisition net operating losses to be $1.9 million.
Any adjustments to this amount in the final purchase price
allocation will result in an adjustment to the recorded goodwill
and will not affect our results of operations. Any changes in
our ability to utilize the pre-acquisition net operating losses
after the final purchase price allocation will be reported in
earnings.
Direct transaction costs totaled approximately $0.8 million
and include investment banking, legal and accounting fees and
other external costs directly related to the Acquisition and are
included in selling, general and administrative expense in our
Consolidated Statement of Operations.
The components of the fair value of the total consideration
transferred for the PV Powered Acquisition are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid to owners
|
|
$
|
76,301
|
|
Cash acquired
|
|
|
(724
|
)
|
Common stock issued 997,966 shares
|
|
|
14,690
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of consideration transferred
|
|
$
|
90,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
56
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes estimated fair values of the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of May 3, 2010
(in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
$
|
4,777
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
8,363
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
277
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
2,746
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
4,065
|
|
Deposits and other noncurrent assets
|
|
|
67
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(5,480
|
)
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
(2,744
|
)
|
Deferred tax liabilities
|
|
|
(18,711
|
)
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
(2,739
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(9,379
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortizable intangible assets:
|
|
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
|
5,277
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
28,208
|
|
In process research and development
|
|
|
14,868
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
2,213
|
|
Backlog
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortizable intangible assets
|
|
|
51,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identifiable net assets
|
|
|
41,907
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
48,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total fair value of consideration transferred
|
|
$
|
90,267
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A summary of the intangible assets acquired, amortization method
and estimated useful lives follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Method
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Trademarks
|
|
$
|
5,277
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
|
|
10 years
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
28,208
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
In process research and development
|
|
|
14,868
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
|
|
8 years
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
2,213
|
|
|
|
Accelerated
|
|
|
|
7 years
|
|
Backlog
|
|
|
720
|
|
|
|
Straight-line
|
|
|
|
6 months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
51,286
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The amortization of in process research and development will not
begin until the specific project is complete and put into
production.
57
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The results of PV Powered operations are included in our
Consolidated Statements of Operations beginning May 3, 2010
as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
May 3, 2010 to
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
65,748
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
8,745
|
|
Pro Forma
Results for PV Powered Acquisition
The following unaudited pro forma financial information
presents the combined results of operations of Advanced Energy
and PV Powered as if the acquisition had occurred as of
January 1, 2009. The pro forma financial information is
presented for informational purposes and is not indicative of
the results of operations that would have been achieved if the
acquisition had taken place at January 1, 2009. The
unaudited pro forma financial information for the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009 includes the historical results
of Advanced Energy for the years ended December 31, 2010
and 2009, historical results of PV Powered for the period
January 1, 2009 to May 2, 2010, and the
post-acquisition results of PV Powered for the period
May 3, 2010 to December 31, 2010.
The unaudited pro forma results for all periods presented
include amortization charges for acquired intangible assets and
related tax effects. These pro forma results consider the sale
of the gas flow control business and related product lines as
discontinued operations. The unaudited pro forma results follow:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
471,274
|
|
|
$
|
183,300
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
80,806
|
|
|
|
(112,244
|
)
|
Earnings (loss) per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
$
|
1.87
|
|
|
$
|
(2.61
|
)
|
Diluted
|
|
|
1.85
|
|
|
|
(2.61
|
)
|
Disposition
On October 15, 2010, we completed the sale of our gas flow
control business, which includes the
Aera®
mass flow control and related product lines to Hitachi Metals,
Ltd., for approximately $43.3 million. Assets and
liabilities sold include, without limitation, inventory, real
property in Hachioji, Japan, equipment, certain contracts,
intellectual property rights related to the gas flow control
business and certain warranty liability obligations. During the
fourth quarter of 2010, we recorded a $12.5 million gain on
the asset disposition, net of $1.7 million in taxes.
In connection with the closing of this asset disposition, we
entered into a Master Services Agreement and a Supplemental
Transition Services Agreement where we will provide certain
transition services until October 2011 and we became an
authorized service provider for Hitachi in all countries other
than Japan.
In accordance with authoritative accounting guidance for
reporting discontinued operations, the results of continuing
operations were reduced by the revenue and costs associated with
the gas flow control business which are included in the income
(loss) from discontinued operations, net of taxes, in our
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
58
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Operating results of discontinued operations are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Sales
|
|
$
|
51,204
|
|
|
$
|
24,549
|
|
|
$
|
43,752
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
38,327
|
|
|
|
19,972
|
|
|
|
28,540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
12,877
|
|
|
|
4,577
|
|
|
|
15,212
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
|
1,922
|
|
|
|
2,130
|
|
|
|
2,827
|
|
Selling, general and administrative
|
|
|
3,301
|
|
|
|
3,444
|
|
|
|
4,032
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
|
491
|
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
5,469
|
|
|
|
6,065
|
|
|
|
7,343
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating income (loss) from discontinued operations
|
|
|
7,408
|
|
|
|
(1,488
|
)
|
|
|
7,869
|
|
Gain on sale of net assets of discontinued operations
|
|
|
14,249
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes
|
|
|
21,657
|
|
|
|
(1,488
|
)
|
|
|
7,869
|
|
Provision for income taxes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income taxes on operating income (loss) from discontinued
operations
|
|
|
2,340
|
|
|
|
(595
|
)
|
|
|
3,147
|
|
Income taxes on gain on sale of net assets of discontinued
operations
|
|
|
1,718
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total provision for income taxes
|
|
|
4,058
|
|
|
|
(595
|
)
|
|
|
3,147
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
17,599
|
|
|
$
|
(893
|
)
|
|
$
|
4,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets and liabilities held for sale consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
8,551
|
|
Property and equipment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,927
|
|
Other intangible assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets of business held for sale
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued warranty expense
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
119
|
|
Deferred income tax liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,357
|
|
Other
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities of business held for sale
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
59
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The provisions for income taxes for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
6,445
|
|
|
$
|
1,018
|
|
|
$
|
7,312
|
|
State and local
|
|
|
1,194
|
|
|
|
(697
|
)
|
|
|
1,200
|
|
Foreign taxes
|
|
|
6,177
|
|
|
|
6,261
|
|
|
|
6,127
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,816
|
|
|
$
|
6,582
|
|
|
$
|
14,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
7,170
|
|
|
$
|
11,865
|
|
|
$
|
6,822
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
6,646
|
|
|
|
(5,283
|
)
|
|
|
7,817
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,816
|
|
|
$
|
6,582
|
|
|
$
|
14,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following reconciles our effective tax rate on income from
continuing operations to the federal statutory rate for the
years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Income taxes per federal statutory rate
|
|
$
|
23,566
|
|
|
$
|
(33,851
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,602
|
|
State income taxes, net of federal deduction
|
|
|
849
|
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
(524
|
)
|
Repatriation of foreign earnings, net of foreign tax credits
|
|
|
(4,590
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intellectual property transfer
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33,130
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nondeductible goodwill impairment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22,140
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of foreign taxes at different rates
|
|
|
(7,597
|
)
|
|
|
901
|
|
|
|
(7,942
|
)
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(18,360
|
)
|
|
|
17,984
|
|
Other permanent items, net
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
|
2,211
|
|
|
|
(481
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
13,816
|
|
|
$
|
6,582
|
|
|
$
|
14,639
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
60
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The sources of our net deferred income tax assets are summarized
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employee bonuses and commissions
|
|
$
|
823
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
Warranty reserve
|
|
|
2,649
|
|
|
|
2,443
|
|
Bad debt reserve
|
|
|
913
|
|
|
|
590
|
|
Vacation accrual
|
|
|
966
|
|
|
|
510
|
|
Excess and obsolete inventory
|
|
|
4,182
|
|
|
|
3,932
|
|
Other
|
|
|
(356
|
)
|
|
|
3,249
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(1,793
|
)
|
|
|
(1,529
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current
|
|
|
7,384
|
|
|
|
9,222
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net operating loss and tax credit carryforward
|
|
|
14,419
|
|
|
|
17,507
|
|
Depreciation and amortization, net
|
|
|
(17,136
|
)
|
|
|
2,212
|
|
Other
|
|
|
3,924
|
|
|
|
2,021
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(3,197
|
)
|
|
|
(3,461
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term, net
|
|
|
(1,990
|
)
|
|
|
18,279
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total deferred tax assets, net
|
|
$
|
5,394
|
|
|
$
|
27,501
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, we had a gross federal net
operating loss, foreign tax credit and research and development
credit carryforwards of approximately $15.8 million,
$2.3 million and $6.1 million, respectively, which may
be available to offset future federal income tax liabilities.
All of the gross federal net operating losses are limited by
certain provision of the U.S. tax code which restricts
their utilization in the future and a valuation allowance of
$5.0 million has been provided as realization of these
benefits is not expected.
In the second half of 2009, we reconfigured our legal entity
structure to realign our Chinese manufacturing operations with
the intellectual property utilized in such manufacturing. At
December 31, 2009, we transferred the economic rights to
our patents and know-how between affiliates throughout the
world, including the parent company. As a result of this
realignment, we generated $84.4 million of taxable income
in the United States and Japan and, thus, reversed
$35.3 million of our valuation allowance and we utilized
previously reserved deferred tax assets.
The federal net operating loss, foreign tax credits and research
and development credit carry forwards expire at various dates
through December 31, 2030, including $5.8 million and
$4.6 million of the federal net operating loss expiring on
December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2023 respectively.
The foreign tax credit carryforward expires on December 31,
2030. As of December 31, 2010, we had a gross foreign net
operating loss carryforward of $0.6 million which may be
available to offset future foreign income tax liabilities. The
foreign net operating loss carryforward generated in the United
Kingdom has no expiration.
We intend to repatriate approximately $30.0 million from
Japan during 2011, and deferred U.S. income taxes of
$2.1 million (net of related foreign tax credits of
$12.9 million) have been included in the 2010 income tax
expense. Other than this planned repatriation, undistributed
earnings of foreign subsidiaries are considered to be
permanently reinvested and accordingly, no provision for
U.S. federal and state income taxes or foreign withholding
taxes has been made. Unrepatriated earnings could become subject
61
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
to U.S. income taxes (subject to a reduction for foreign
tax credits) and withholding taxes payable to the various
foreign countries if they are remitted as dividends, are loaned
to us, or if we sell our stock in the subsidiaries. The
determination of the additional deferred taxes that have not
been provided on undistributed earnings is not practicable.
The domestic and foreign component of our income (loss) before
income taxes for the years ended December 31 was as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Domestic
|
|
$
|
47,010
|
|
|
$
|
(66,273
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,277
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
20,399
|
|
|
|
(28,957
|
)
|
|
|
32,415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
67,409
|
|
|
$
|
(95,230
|
)
|
|
$
|
8,138
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
Contingencies
We account for uncertain tax positions by applying a minimum
recognition threshold to tax positions before recognizing these
positions in the financial statements.
The reconciliation of our tax contingencies is as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
14,987
|
|
|
$
|
13,468
|
|
|
$
|
9,985
|
|
Additions based on tax positions taken during a prior period
|
|
|
318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,126
|
|
Reductions based on tax positions taken during a prior period
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
(4,190
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Additions based on tax positions taken during the current period
|
|
|
381
|
|
|
|
5,709
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions based on tax positions taken during the current period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,357
|
|
Reductions related to settlement of tax matters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reductions related to a lapse of applicable statute of
limitations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
15,665
|
|
|
$
|
14,987
|
|
|
$
|
13,468
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the $15.7 million of tax contingencies reverse,
$6.0 million will affect our effective tax rate. The tax
years 2004 through 2010 remain open to examination by the United
States and foreign taxing jurisdictions to which we are subject.
In accordance with our accounting policy, we recognize accrued
interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a
component of tax expense. We had an immaterial amount of accrued
interest and penalties at December 31, 2010 and 2009. We do
not anticipate a material change to the amount of unrecognized
tax positions within the next 12 months.
While management believes it has adequately provided for all tax
positions, amounts asserted by taxing authorities could
materially differ from our accrued positions as a result of
uncertain and complex application of tax regulations.
Additionally, the recognition and measurement of certain tax
benefits includes estimates and judgment by management and
inherently includes subjectivity. Accordingly, additional
provisions on federal and foreign tax-related matters could be
recorded in the future as revised estimates are made or the
underlying matters are settled or otherwise resolved.
|
|
NOTE 4.
|
EARNINGS
PER SHARE
|
Basic earnings per share (EPS) is computed by
dividing income available to common stockholders by the
weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the
period. The computation of diluted EPS is similar to the
computation of basic EPS except that the numerator is increased
to exclude charges which would not have been incurred, and the
denominator is increased to include the number of additional
62
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
common shares that would have been outstanding (using the
if-converted and treasury stock methods), if securities
containing potentially dilutive common shares (stock options and
restricted stock units) had been converted to common shares, and
if such assumed conversion is dilutive.
The following is a reconciliation of the weighted-average shares
outstanding used in the calculation of basic and diluted
earnings per share for the years ended December 31, 2010,
2009 and 2008:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
|
|
Net income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income taxes
|
|
$
|
53,593
|
|
|
$
|
(101,812
|
)
|
|
$
|
(6,501
|
)
|
Basic weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
42,862
|
|
|
|
41,966
|
|
|
|
42,537
|
|
Assumed exercise of dilutive stock options and restricted stock
units
|
|
|
557
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
|
43,419
|
|
|
|
41,966
|
|
|
|
42,537
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings (loss) per common share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
1.25
|
|
|
$
|
(2.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
Diluted earnings (loss) per share
|
|
$
|
1.23
|
|
|
$
|
(2.43
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.15
|
)
|
As of December 31, 2010, stock options and restricted stock
units of 6.2 million shares were outstanding, of which
3.6 million shares for the period were not included in the
computation of diluted earnings per share because the exercise
price exceeded the average price per share for the period.
As of December 31, 2009, stock options and restricted stock
units of 5.2 million shares were outstanding. All
potentially dilutive common shares were excluded from the
computation as the effect of including the instruments in the
computation would be anti-dilutive due to our net loss for the
period.
As of December 31, 2008, stock options and restricted stock
units of 4.3 million shares were outstanding. All
potentially dilutive common shares were excluded from the
computation as the effect of including the instruments in the
computation would be anti-dilutive due to our net loss for the
period.
Stock
Buyback
In December 2007, our Board of Directors authorized a program to
repurchase up to $75.0 million of our common stock over a
twelve month period. Under this program, in 2008, we repurchased
and retired 3,775,000 shares of our common stock for a
total of $49.8 million. We suspended our stock repurchase
program in April 2008.
All shares repurchased were executed in the open market and no
shares were repurchased from related parties. Repurchased shares
were retired and assumed the status of authorized and unissued
shares.
|
|
NOTE 5.
|
MARKETABLE
SECURITIES
|
Our investments with original maturities of more than three
months at time of purchase are considered marketable securities
available for sale.
63
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The composition of our marketable securities is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2010
|
|
|
December 31, 2009
|
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
Cost
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
3,996
|
|
|
$
|
3,996
|
|
Treasury bills
|
|
|
2,003
|
|
|
|
2,006
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
3,126
|
|
|
|
3,126
|
|
|
|
5,458
|
|
|
|
5,458
|
|
Corporate bonds/notes
|
|
|
1,002
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
7,034
|
|
|
|
7,028
|
|
Municipal bonds/notes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,423
|
|
|
|
6,423
|
|
Agency bonds/notes
|
|
|
3,503
|
|
|
|
3,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auction rate securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21,650
|
|
|
|
18,249
|
|
Put Agreement
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,247
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total securities
|
|
$
|
9,634
|
|
|
$
|
9,640
|
|
|
$
|
44,561
|
|
|
$
|
44,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The maturities of our marketable securities available for sale
as of December 31, 2010 are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earliest
|
|
|
|
Latest
|
|
Treasury bills
|
|
5/31/2011
|
|
to
|
|
5/31/2011
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
4/14/2011
|
|
to
|
|
12/10/2011
|
Corporate bonds/notes
|
|
6/3/2011
|
|
to
|
|
6/3/2011
|
Agency bonds
|
|
1/18/2011
|
|
to
|
|
4/18/2011
|
The value and liquidity of our marketable securities are
affected by market conditions as well as the ability of the
issuer to make principal and interest payments when due, and the
functioning of the markets in which these securities are traded.
Our current investments in marketable securities are expected to
be liquidated during the next year.
During June 2010, we liquidated our auction rate securities
(ARS) at face value and our non-transferrable
Auction Rate Securities Rights Agreement (the Put
Agreement) expired on July 2, 2010 without exercise.
As of December 31, 2010, we do not believe any of the
underlying issuers of our marketable securities are presently at
risk of default.
|
|
NOTE 6.
|
ASSETS
AND LIABILITIES MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE
|
Fair
Value Hierarchy
Financial assets and liabilities recorded at fair value in our
Consolidated Balance Sheets are categorized based upon a fair
value hierarchy established by U.S. GAAP, which prioritizes
the inputs used to measure fair value into the following levels:
|
|
|
|
Level 1:
|
Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities at the measurement date.
|
|
|
Level 2:
|
Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and
liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that
are observable and can be corroborated by observable market data.
|
64
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
Level 3:
|
Inputs reflect managements best estimates and assumptions
of what market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability at the measurement date. The inputs are unobservable
in the market and significant to the valuation of the
instruments.
|
A financial instruments categorization within the
valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that
is significant to the fair value measurement.
Assets
and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring
Basis
The following tables present information about our financial
assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, and indicate
the fair value hierarchy of the valuation techniques utilized to
determine such fair value. We did not have any financial
liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
December 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
2010:
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Treasury bills
|
|
$
|
2,006
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,006
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
3,126
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,126
|
|
Corporate bonds/notes
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,004
|
|
Agency bonds/notes
|
|
|
3,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,504
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
9,640
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,640
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
2009:
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Auction rate securities(1)
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
18,249
|
|
|
$
|
18,249
|
|
Put Agreement(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,247
|
|
|
|
3,247
|
|
Certificates of deposit
|
|
|
5,458
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,458
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
3,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,996
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
|
6,423
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6,423
|
|
Corporate bonds/notes
|
|
|
7,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,028
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
22,905
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
21,496
|
|
|
$
|
44,401
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
As of December 31, 2009, the fair value of our ARS and the
Put Agreement were determined using Level 3 inputs. Some of
the inputs into the discounted cash flow models we used were
unobservable in the market and had a significant effect on the
valuation. The assumptions used in preparing the models
included, but were not limited to, periodic coupon rates, market
required rates of return and the expected term of each security.
The coupon rate was estimated using implied forward rate data on
interest rate swaps and United States treasuries, and limited
where necessary by any contractual maximum rate paid under a
scenario of continuing auction failures. We believe implied
forward rates inherently account for a lack of liquidity. In
making assumptions of the required rates of return, we
considered risk-free interest rates and credit spreads for
investments of similar credit quality. The expected term for the
ARS was based on a weighted probability-based estimate of the
time the principal would become available to us with and without
exercising our Put Agreement. The expected term for the Put
Agreement was based on the earliest date on which we could
exercise our put. |
65
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
There were no transfers in and out of Level 1 and
Level 2 fair value measurements during the year ended
December 31, 2010. The following table presents the
activity in Level 3 instruments during the years ended
December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ARS
|
|
|
Put Agreement
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2008
|
|
$
|
24,938
|
|
|
$
|
5,459
|
|
|
$
|
30,397
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) included in other income
|
|
|
711
|
|
|
|
(417
|
)
|
|
|
294
|
|
Purchases, sales, and settlements, net
|
|
|
(7,400
|
)
|
|
|
(1,795
|
)
|
|
|
(9,195
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
18,249
|
|
|
|
3,247
|
|
|
|
21,496
|
|
Net realized gain (loss) included in other income
|
|
|
3,401
|
|
|
|
(3,247
|
)
|
|
|
154
|
|
Purchases, sales, and settlements, net
|
|
|
(21,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(21,650
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balances at December 31, 2010
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our inventories consisted of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Parts and raw materials
|
|
$
|
53,755
|
|
|
$
|
18,882
|
|
Work in process
|
|
|
5,594
|
|
|
|
3,061
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
18,244
|
|
|
|
6,624
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
77,593
|
|
|
$
|
28,567
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 8.
|
PROPERTY
AND EQUIPMENT
|
Details of property and equipment are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Buildings and land
|
|
$
|
1,701
|
|
|
$
|
533
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
53,885
|
|
|
|
37,155
|
|
Computer and communication equipment
|
|
|
23,296
|
|
|
|
26,141
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
5,717
|
|
|
|
3,661
|
|
Vehicles
|
|
|
541
|
|
|
|
490
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
28,003
|
|
|
|
20,641
|
|
Construction in process
|
|
|
3,996
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
117,139
|
|
|
|
88,621
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(82,570
|
)
|
|
|
(69,934
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
34,569
|
|
|
$
|
18,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
66
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Depreciation expense recorded in continuing operations for the
years ended December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 and included
in selling, general and administrative expense is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Depreciation expense
|
|
$
|
7,226
|
|
|
$
|
7,818
|
|
|
$
|
8,767
|
|
The following summarizes the changes in goodwill during the
years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount (including the effect of changes in
exchange rates), beginning of period
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
$
|
63,260
|
|
Additions and adjustments
|
|
|
48,360
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impairments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(63,260
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net carrying amount, end of period
|
|
$
|
48,360
|
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions during 2010 represent the difference between the
purchase price paid and values assigned to identifiable assets
acquired and liabilities assumed in purchase accounting, as
described in Note 2 Business Acquisition and
Disposition.
|
|
NOTE 10.
|
INTANGIBLE
ASSETS
|
Other intangible assets consisted of the following as of
December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Net Carrying
|
|
|
Useful Life
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
in Years
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except weighted-average useful life)
|
|
|
Amortizable intangibles:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology-based
|
|
$
|
43,075
|
|
|
$
|
(2,270
|
)
|
|
$
|
40,805
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
Trademarks and other
|
|
|
8,210
|
|
|
|
(594
|
)
|
|
|
7,616
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortizable intangibles
|
|
$
|
51,285
|
|
|
$
|
(2,864
|
)
|
|
$
|
48,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangible assets consisted of the following as of
December 31, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Changes in
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
|
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
Exchange
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Carrying
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Rates
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except weighted-average useful life)
|
|
|
Amortizable intangibles:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology-based
|
|
$
|
7,015
|
|
|
$
|
1,544
|
|
|
$
|
(8,559
|
)
|
|
$
|
|
|
67
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Amortization expense related to intangible assets is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Amortization expense
|
|
$
|
2,864
|
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
462
|
|
Estimated amortization expense related to amortizable
intangibles based on estimates of when in-process research and
development is anticipated to move into production for each of
the five years 2011 through 2015 and thereafter is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Year Ending December
31,
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
3,683
|
|
2012
|
|
|
6,489
|
|
2013
|
|
|
8,464
|
|
2014
|
|
|
9,181
|
|
2015
|
|
|
8,655
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
11,949
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
48,421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provisions of our sales agreements include product warranties
customary to these types of agreements, ranging from
18 months to 10 years following installation. The
provision for the estimated cost of warranties is recorded when
revenue is recognized. The warranty provision is based on
historical experience by product, configuration and geographic
region. Accruals are established for warranty issues that are
probable to result in future costs. Changes in accrued product
warranties, including those acquired in the PV Powered
transaction are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at beginning of period
|
|
$
|
7,005
|
|
|
$
|
6,005
|
|
|
$
|
8,182
|
|
Warranty liabilities acquired
|
|
|
2,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Increases to accruals related to sales during the period
|
|
|
10,463
|
|
|
|
7,143
|
|
|
|
10,317
|
|
Warranty expenditures
|
|
|
(7,144
|
)
|
|
|
(6,143
|
)
|
|
|
(12,494
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period
|
|
$
|
12,949
|
|
|
$
|
7,005
|
|
|
$
|
6,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 12.
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
As of December 31, 2010, we had two active stock-based
incentive compensation plans; the 2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan
and the Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP). All new
equity compensation grants are issued under these two plans;
however, outstanding awards previously issued under inactive
plans will continue to vest and remain exercisable in accordance
with the terms of the respective plans. At December 31,
2010, there were 10.5 million shares reserved and
4.4 million shares available for future grant under our
stock-based incentive plans.
68
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
2008 OMNIBUS INCENTIVE PLAN The 2008 Omnibus
Incentive Plan (the Plan) provides officers,
directors, key employees and other persons an opportunity to
acquire or increase a direct proprietary interest in our
operations and future success. Our Board of Directors currently
administers the Plan, and makes all decisions concerning which
officers, directors, employees and other persons are granted
awards, how many to grant to each recipient, when awards are
granted, how the Plan should be interpreted, whether to amend or
terminate the Plan and whether to delegate administration of the
Plan to a committee. In May 2010, our shareholders approved an
increase from 3,500,000 to 7,500,000 shares authorized for
issuance under the Plan. The Plan provides for the grant of
stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock,
stock units (including deferred stock units), unrestricted stock
and dividend equivalent rights. Any of the awards may be made as
performance incentives to reward attainment of annual or
long-term performance goals in accordance with the terms of the
Plan. Stock options granted under the Plan may be non-qualified
stock options or incentive stock options except that stock
options granted to outside directors, consultants or advisers
providing services to us shall in all cases be non-qualified
stock options. The Plan will terminate on May 7, 2018
unless the administrator terminates the Plan earlier. As of
December 31, 2010, 3,838,589 shares of common stock were
available for grant under the Plan.
Stock-based
Compensation Expense
Non-cash stock-based compensation expense is primarily included
in general and administrative expense and was $8.5 million,
$5.8 million and $5.1 million for the years ending
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Our stock-based compensation expense is based on the value of
the portion of share-based payment awards that are ultimately
expected to vest, assuming estimated forfeitures at the time of
grant. Estimated forfeiture rates for our stock-based
compensation expense applicable to options and RSUs was
approximately 12% for each of the years ended December 31,
2010, 2009 and 2008.
Stock
Options
Stock option awards are generally granted with an exercise price
equal to the market price of our stock at the date of grant and
with a four-year vesting schedule and a term of 10 years.
The fair value of options granted during the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 was estimated on the date
of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model
using the following assumptions by grant year:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
2009
|
|
2008
|
Fair value assumptions stock options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rates
|
|
1.3% - 2.6%
|
|
1.9% - 2.4%
|
|
2.8% - 3.4%
|
Expected dividend yield rates
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
|
0.0%
|
Expected term
|
|
5.8 years
|
|
5.5 years
|
|
5.5 years
|
Expected volatility
|
|
63.0%
|
|
63.5%
|
|
61.9%
|
The risk free interest rate is based on the five-year
U.S. Treasury Bill at the time of the grant. Historical
company information is the primary basis for selection of the
expected dividend yield. The expected term is based on
historical experience. Expected volatility is based on
historical volatility of our common stock using daily stock
price observations.
69
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The weighted-average fair value of options issued and total
intrinsic value of options exercised were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share prices)
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant date fair value of options
|
|
$
|
8.71
|
|
|
$
|
5.84
|
|
|
$
|
6.98
|
|
Total intrinsic value of options exercised
|
|
$
|
979
|
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
|
$
|
989
|
|
Changes in outstanding stock options during the year ended
December 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share prices)
|
|
|
Changes in outstanding stock options:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
4,826
|
|
|
$
|
15.05
|
|
Options granted
|
|
|
1,419
|
|
|
|
15.06
|
|
Options exercised
|
|
|
(166
|
)
|
|
|
10.45
|
|
Options forfeited
|
|
|
(241
|
)
|
|
|
12.17
|
|
Options expired
|
|
|
(129
|
)
|
|
|
41.32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options outstanding at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
5,709
|
|
|
|
14.72
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, there was $11.7 million of
total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options
granted and outstanding, net of expected forfeitures related to
non-vested options, which is expected to be recognized through
fiscal year 2014, with a weighted-average remaining vesting
period of 2.5 years. Information about our stock options
that are outstanding, options that we expect to vest and options
that are exercisable at December 31, 2010 follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Aggregate
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Intrinsic
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Value
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share prices and lives)
|
|
|
Options outstanding
|
|
|
5,709
|
|
|
$
|
14.72
|
|
|
|
6.8 years
|
|
|
$
|
8,431
|
|
Options expected to vest
|
|
|
5,200
|
|
|
|
14.86
|
|
|
|
6.6 years
|
|
|
|
7,787
|
|
Options exercisable
|
|
|
2,765
|
|
|
|
16.47
|
|
|
|
4.8 years
|
|
|
|
4,042
|
|
70
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table summarizes information about the stock
options outstanding at December 31, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Options Exercisable
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Remaining
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
|
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Contractual
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Exercise
|
|
Range of Exercise
Prices
|
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Life
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
Exercisable
|
|
|
Price
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share prices and lives)
|
|
|
$7.15 to $12.19
|
|
|
1,883
|
|
|
|
6.9 years
|
|
|
$
|
9.33
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
$
|
9.28
|
|
$12.19 to $15.65
|
|
|
2,089
|
|
|
|
8.3 years
|
|
|
|
14.14
|
|
|
|
545
|
|
|
|
13.85
|
|
$15.66 to $38.55
|
|
|
1,737
|
|
|
|
4.7 years
|
|
|
|
21.25
|
|
|
|
1,321
|
|
|
|
22.45
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$7.15 to $38.55
|
|
|
5,709
|
|
|
|
6.8 years
|
|
|
|
14.72
|
|
|
|
2,765
|
|
|
|
16.47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted
Stock Units
The fair value of our RSUs is determined based upon the closing
fair market value of our common stock on the grant date. Changes
in the unvested restricted stock units during the year ended
December 31, 2010 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
385
|
|
RSUs granted
|
|
|
235
|
|
RSUs vested
|
|
|
(133
|
)
|
RSUs forfeited
|
|
|
(40
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
447
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average fair value of RSUs issued and total fair
value of RSUs converted to shares were:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands, except share prices)
|
|
|
Weighted-average grant date fair value of RSUs
|
|
$
|
14.79
|
|
|
$
|
9.76
|
|
|
$
|
12.54
|
|
Total fair value of RSUs converted to shares
|
|
$
|
1,923
|
|
|
$
|
1,555
|
|
|
$
|
1,793
|
|
As of December 31, 2010, there was $2.5 million of
total unrecognized compensation cost, net of expected
forfeitures related to non-vested RSUs granted, which is
expected to be recognized through fiscal 2014, with a
weighted-average remaining vesting period of 2.5 years.
Employee
Stock Purchase Plan
The ESPP, a stockholder-approved plan, provides for the issuance
of rights to purchase up to 1,000,000 shares of common
stock. In May 2010, shareholders approved an increase from
500,000 to 1,000,000 shares authorized for sale under our
ESPP. Employees are eligible to participate in the ESPP if
employed by us for at least 20 hours per week during at
least five months per calendar year. Participating employees may
contribute up to the lesser of 5% of their eligible earnings or
$1,250 during each plan period. Currently, the plan period is
six months. The purchase price of common stock purchased under
the ESPP is currently equal to the lower of: 1) 85% of the
fair market value of our common stock on the commencement
71
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
date of each plan period or 2) 85% of the fair market value
of our common shares on each plan period purchase date. At
December 31, 2010, 516,244 shares remained available
for future issuance under the ESPP.
Purchase rights granted under the ESPP are valued using the
Black-Scholes-Merton model. As of December 31, 2010, there
was an immaterial amount of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to the ESPP that is expected to be recognized over a
remaining period of four months. Total compensation expense was
$0.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2010 and
2008. No compensation expense was recognized in the year ended
December 31, 2009 related to our ESPP.
The fair value of each purchase right granted under the ESPP was
estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton
option pricing model with the following assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
Fair value assumptions ESPP:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk-free interest rates
|
|
|
0.2% - 0.3%
|
|
|
|
0.2% - 0.3%
|
|
|
|
2.7% - 3.1%
|
|
Expected dividend yield rates
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
|
|
0.0%
|
|
Expected term
|
|
|
0.5 years
|
|
|
|
0.5 years
|
|
|
|
0.5 years
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
62.8%
|
|
|
|
63.5%
|
|
|
|
61.9%
|
|
The risk free interest rate is based on the six month
U.S. Treasury Bill at the time of the grant. Historical
company information is the primary basis for selection of the
expected dividend yield. The expected term is based on
historical experience. Expected volatility is based on
historical volatility of our common shares using daily stock
price observations.
|
|
NOTE 13.
|
RETIREMENT
PLANS
|
We have a 401(k) profit sharing and retirement savings plan
covering substantially all full-time U.S. employees.
Participants may defer up to the maximum amount allowed as
determined by law. Participants are immediately vested in their
contributions. Profit sharing contributions to the plan, which
are discretionary, are approved by the Board of Directors.
Vesting in the profit sharing contribution account is based on
years of service, with most participants fully vested after four
years of credited service.
For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2008, our
contribution for participants in our 401(k) plan was 50%
matching on contributions by employees up to 6% of the
employees compensation. There were no contributions made
by us for participants in 2009.
During the years ended December 31, 2010, 2009, and 2008 we
recognized total defined contribution benefit plan costs of
$0.7 million, $0.0 million and $1.3 million,
respectively.
72
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 14.
|
ACCUMULATED
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income consisted of the
following (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on
available-for-sale
securities:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
Unrealized holding gain, net of realized amounts reclassified to
net income
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated foreign currency translation adjustments:
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2009
|
|
|
27,411
|
|
Translation adjustments
|
|
|
(343
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2010
|
|
|
27,068
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total accumulated other comprehensive income
|
|
$
|
27,074
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 15.
|
COMMITMENTS
AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Disputes
and Legal Actions
We are involved in disputes and legal actions from time to time
in the ordinary course of business.
During 2008, the Customs Office of Taipei, Taiwan issued a
series of orders to our Taiwanese subsidiary, Advanced Energy
Taiwan, Ltd., requiring that certain of our products
manufactured in mainland China and allegedly imported without
proper authorization be removed from Taiwan. We protested the
orders based upon rulings of the Taiwan Bureau of Foreign Trade
that the products were authorized for unrestricted import. We
originally appealed to the Taiwan High Administrative Court
which ruled against us in May 2009. We then appealed that
decision to the Taiwan Supreme Administrative Court and it
remains pending. We have previously recorded a charge of
$0.3 million as our best estimate of the amount we are
likely to pay to resolve this matter. The maximum penalty
related to this matter is $2.3 million if the Customs
Office determines that we have not complied with the removal
orders. We believe the likelihood of the Customs Office
determining that we have not complied with the removal orders to
be remote.
Operating
Leases
We have various operating leases for automobiles, equipment and
office and production facilities. Rent expense under operating
leases was approximately $6.0 million in 2010,
$6.1 million in 2009 and $6.1 million in 2008.
The future minimum rental payments required under non-cancelable
operating leases as of December 31, 2010 are as follows (in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
2011
|
|
$
|
5,894
|
|
2012
|
|
|
5,423
|
|
2013
|
|
|
4,461
|
|
2014
|
|
|
3,414
|
|
2015
|
|
|
3,041
|
|
Thereafter
|
|
|
707
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,940
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
73
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 16.
|
RESTRUCTURING
COSTS
|
Throughout 2008 and during the first nine months of 2009, we
implemented cost reduction efforts in response to deteriorating
economic conditions and weakening demand from our end markets.
During this timeframe, we reduced our global workforce by
approximately 455 people, or 27% of total headcount, across
all functional areas and geographies.
We completed our restructuring activities in 2009 and incurred
restructuring costs of $4.4 million in 2009 and
$3.5 million in 2008 for cumulative restructuring costs of
$7.9 million. These costs were primarily severance and
benefits expenses related to reductions in workforce. As of
December 31, 2009, we had no remaining obligations related
to restructuring including severance and benefits payments.
The following table summarizes the components of our
restructuring costs (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued restructuring costs December 31, 2007
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
Total net restructuring charges during 2008
|
|
|
3,487
|
|
Payments and other settlements during 2008
|
|
|
(1,698
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued restructuring costs December 31, 2008
|
|
|
1,825
|
|
Total net restructuring charges during 2009
|
|
|
4,376
|
|
Payments and other settlements during 2009
|
|
|
(6,201
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued restructuring costs December 31, 2009
|
|
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 17.
|
OTHER
INCOME, NET
|
During 2010, we participated, through our wholly owned
subsidiary PV Powered, in the Solar Energy Grid Integration
System Program (SEGIS) sponsored by the Department
of Energy and administered by Sandia National Labs. Our
participation in the SEGIS program is performed in stages, and
revenue, net of costs incurred, is recognized in other income,
net, in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. We invoice
SEGIS upon completion of certain milestones. Net revenues of
$1.2 million were recognized and recorded in Other income,
net, as this project does not represent commercial product sales
and we are not normally engaged in research and development type
projects from which revenue is generated.
|
|
NOTE 18.
|
RELATED
PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
We lease our executive offices and manufacturing facilities in
Fort Collins, Colorado from a limited liability partnership
in which Douglas Schatz, our Chairman of the Board and former
Chief Executive Officer holds an interest. The leases relating
to these spaces expire during 2015 and obligate us to total
annual payments of approximately $3.0 million which
includes facilities rent and common area maintenance costs.
Related party rent and related expenses for the years ended
December 31, 2010, 2009 and 2008 were $2.8 million,
$2.9 million and $3.1 million, respectively.
SITIZN Holdings, a German-based company, and its subsidiary
Solayer are customers of Advanced Energy. Douglas S. Schatz,
Chairman of the Board of Advanced Energy, holds a direct
controlling equity interest in SITIZN and is a board member.
Since January 1, 2010, SITIZN and Solayer have ordered
approximately $0.7 million of our power products and
training services.
In November 2008, we reimbursed Mr. Schatz $125,000 for a
filing fee that he paid to the Federal Trade Commission in
connection with notifications submitted by us and
Mr. Schatz under the
Hart-Scott-Rodino
Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976. The notifications were
required in connection with Mr. Schatzs acquisition
of common stock upon the vesting of RSUs that had been granted
to Mr. Schatz while he was serving as our Chief Executive
Officer.
74
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
NOTE 19.
|
GEOGRAPHIC
AND SIGNIFICANT CUSTOMER INFORMATION
|
The combination of PV Powereds solar inverter product line
with our Solaron inverter product line resulted in revenue
growth, both in absolute dollars and as a percentage of our
overall revenue. Serving the inverter market has proven to
require management, marketing, sales and engineering efforts
that are uniquely different from those of our traditional
thin-film capital equipment market. As a result, management has
announced the creation of two focused business units within the
Company effective January 1, 2011. The two business units,
Thin Films Deposition Power Conversion and Thermal
Instrumentation (Thin Films) and Renewable Power
Inverters (Renewables), will enable improved
execution and a strategic focus on two distinct markets.
Due to the structure of our internal organization, the design of
our internal systems and the manner in which expenses were
tracked and managed, we are unable to recast our financial
statements by operating segment for 2010 and prior without
significant cost and effort. Therefore, segment information
based on the two new business units for 2008, 2009 and 2010 has
not been reported as it is impracticable to do so.
Our chief operating decision-makers manage our business as a
single operating segment, which includes the design,
manufacture, sale and support of power conversion products that
transform power into various usable forms. We have operations in
the United States, Europe and Asia. Our disclosures about sales
and long-lived assets by geographic area and information
relating to major customers are presented below. Sales
attributed to individual countries are based on the location of
our sales office.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
Sales to external
customers:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
270,606
|
|
|
$
|
71,439
|
|
|
$
|
122,474
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peoples Republic of China
|
|
|
48,024
|
|
|
|
11,372
|
|
|
|
19,646
|
|
Other Asian countries
|
|
|
88,872
|
|
|
|
55,081
|
|
|
|
94,934
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
136,896
|
|
|
|
66,453
|
|
|
|
114,580
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
47,339
|
|
|
|
19,949
|
|
|
|
42,657
|
|
Other European Countries
|
|
|
4,573
|
|
|
|
4,005
|
|
|
|
5,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
51,912
|
|
|
|
23,954
|
|
|
|
48,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
$
|
459,414
|
|
|
$
|
161,846
|
|
|
$
|
285,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75
ADVANCED
ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
NOTES TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
2008
|
|
|
United States
|
|
|
58.9%
|
|
|
|
44.1%
|
|
|
|
42.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peoples Republic of China
|
|
|
10.5%
|
|
|
|
7.0%
|
|
|
|
6.9%
|
|
Other Asian countries
|
|
|
19.3%
|
|
|
|
34.1%
|
|
|
|
33.3%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
29.8%
|
|
|
|
41.1%
|
|
|
|
40.2%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Germany
|
|
|
10.3%
|
|
|
|
12.3%
|
|
|
|
15.0%
|
|
Other European Countries
|
|
|
1.0%
|
|
|
|
2.5%
|
|
|
|
1.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
11.3%
|
|
|
|
14.8%
|
|
|
|
16.9%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
100.0%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Long-lived assets:
|
|
2010
|
|
|
2009
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
123,707
|
|
|
$
|
12,816
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asia
|
|
|
7,226
|
|
|
|
5,349
|
|
|
|
|
|
Europe
|
|
|
417
|
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
131,350
|
|
|
$
|
18,687
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* |
|
Long-lived assets include property and equipment, goodwill and
other intangible assets. |
Sales to Applied Materials Inc., our largest customer, were
$86.4 million or 18.8% of total sales for 2010,
$34.7 million, or 21.4% of total sales, for 2009 and
$62.2 million, or 21.8% of total sales for 2008. Our sales
to Applied Materials include products used in semiconductor
processing and solar, flat panel display and architectural glass
applications. No other customer accounted for 10% or more of our
sales during these periods.
76
ITEM 9.
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.
ITEM 9A.
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We have established disclosure controls and procedures, which
are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed
in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported, within
the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commissions rules and forms. These disclosure controls and
procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in
the reports that we file or submit under the Act is accumulated
and communicated to management, including our Principal
Executive Officer (Hans Georg Betz , Chief Executive Officer and
President) and Principal Financial Officer (Danny C. Herron,
Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer),
as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosures.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we conducted
an evaluation, with the participation of management, including
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the
effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure
controls and procedures pursuant to the Exchange Act
Rule 13a-15(b).
Based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls
and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2010. The
conclusions of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer from this evaluation were communicated to the Audit
Committee. We intend to continue to review and document our
disclosure controls and procedures, including our internal
controls and procedures for financial reporting, and may from
time to time make changes aimed at enhancing their effectiveness
and to ensure that our systems evolve with our business.
Managements
Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
It is managements responsibility to establish and maintain
adequate internal control over our financial reporting, which is
a process designed under the supervision of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer and implemented by our Board
of Directors, management and other personnel. Our internal
control over financial reporting is designed to provide
reasonable assurance concerning the reliability of our financial
reporting and the preparation of our financial statements.
Management, with the participation of our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness
of our internal control over financial reporting as of
December 31, 2010, using the criteria described in
Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission. Based upon this evaluation, and considering the
exclusion of the internal control over financial reporting of PV
Powered from the assessment as described below, management
concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was
effective as of December 31, 2010.
As discussed in Note 2 Business Acquisition
and Disposition, to our Consolidated Financial Statements,
on May 3, 2010, we acquired PV Powered. The scope of our
evaluation did not include specific processes or transactions
unique to PV Powered since PV Powered has not been integrated
into our internal control systems as of December 31, 2010.
We are continuing the integration of PV Powered into our
internal control systems and will include PV Powereds
specific processes and transactions in our fiscal year 2011
evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting. PV Powereds total assets accounted
for 28.6% of our total assets at December 31, 2010. PV
Powered accounted for 14.3% of our total net sales for the year
ended December 31, 2010.
77
Grant Thornton LLP, an independent registered public accounting
firm, has audited our Consolidated Financial Statements included
in this
Form 10-K
and, as part of the audit, has issued a report, included herein,
on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial
reporting as of December 31, 2010.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the fourth quarter of 2010 that
has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Limitations
on Controls and Procedures
Management has concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures and internal control over financial reporting provide
reasonable assurance that the objectives of our control system
are met. We do not expect, however, that our disclosure controls
and procedures or internal control over financial reporting will
prevent or detect all misstatements, errors and fraud, if any.
All control systems, no matter how well designed and
implemented, have inherent limitations; and no evaluation
therefore can provide absolute assurance that every
misstatement, error or instance of fraud, if any, or risk
thereof, has been or will be prevented or detected. The
occurrence of a misstatement, error or fraud, if any, would not
necessarily require a conclusion that our controls and
procedures are not effective.
ITEM 9B.
OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART III
In accordance with General Instruction G(3) of
Form 10-K,
certain information required by this Part III is
incorporated by reference to the definitive proxy statement
relating to our 2011 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the
2011 Proxy Statement), as set forth below. The 2011
Proxy Statement will be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission within 120 days after the end of our fiscal year.
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT
The information set forth in the 2011 Proxy Statement under the
headings Proposal No. 1/ Election of
Directors-Nominees and Section 16(a) Beneficial
Ownership Reporting Compliance is incorporated herein by
reference. The information under the heading Executive
Officers of the Registrant in Part I of this
Form 10-K
is also incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 11.
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information set forth in the 2011 Proxy Statement under the
headings Executive Compensation and Stock
Performance Graph is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 12.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT
AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information set forth in the 2011 Proxy Statement under the
headings Common Stock Ownership by Management and Other
Stockholders and Equity Compensation Plan
Information is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 13.
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
The information is set forth in Note 18
Related Party Transactions to our Consolidated Financial
Statements, and in the 2011 Proxy Statement under the caption
Certain Transactions with Management is incorporated
herein by reference.
78
ITEM 14.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information set forth in the 2011 Proxy Statement under the
caption Fees Billed by Independent Public
Accountants is incorporated herein by reference.
PART IV
ITEM 15.
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(A) Documents filed as part of this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
are as follows:
1. Financial Statements:
Reports of Grant Thornton LLP
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2010 and 2009
Statements of Operations for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2010
Statements of Stockholders Equity for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2010
Statements of Cash Flows for each of the three years in the
period ended December 31, 2010
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2. Financial Statement Schedules for each of the three
years in the period ended December 31, 2010
NOTE: All schedules have been omitted because
they are either not required or the information is included in
the financial statements and notes thereto.
(B) Exhibits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.1
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended.(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.2
|
|
By-laws.(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.3
|
|
Amendment to Bylaws.(3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.4
|
|
Second Amendment to the By-laws of Advanced Energy Industries,
Inc.(24)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
.5
|
|
Third Amendment to the By-Laws of Advanced Energy Industries,
Inc.(28)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
.1
|
|
Form of Specimen Certificate for Common Stock.(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.1
|
|
Lease, dated June 12, 1984, amended June 11, 1992, by
and between Prospect Park East Partnership and Advanced Energy
Industries, Inc., for property located in Fort Collins,
Colorado.(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.2
|
|
Lease, dated March 14, 1994, as amended, by and between
Sharp Point Properties, L.L.C., and Advanced Energy Industries,
Inc., for property located in Fort Collins, Colorado.(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.3
|
|
Lease, dated May 19, 1995, by and between Sharp Point
Properties, L.L.C. and Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., for a
building located in Fort Collins, Colorado.(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.4
|
|
Lease dated March 20, 2000, by and between Sharp Point
Properties, L.L.C. and Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., for a
building located in Fort Collins, Colorado.(5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.5
|
|
Lease Amendment, dated as of April 26, 2010 by and between
Sharp Point Properties, LLC and Advanced Energy Industries,
Inc., for a building located in Fort Collins, Colorado.(29)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.6
|
|
Lease Amendment, dated as of August 19, 2010, by and
between Sharp Point Properties, LLC and Advanced Energy
Industries, Inc., for a building located in Fort Collins,
Colorado.(33)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.7
|
|
Lease dated January 16, 2003, by and between China Great
Wall Computer Shenzhen Co., Ltd., Great Wall Limited and
Advanced Energy Industries (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd., for a building
located in Shenzhen, China.(6)
|
79
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.8
|
|
Form of Indemnification Agreement.(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.9
|
|
1995 Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated through
February 7, 2001.(7)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.10
|
|
1995 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended
and restated through February 7, 2001.(7)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.11
|
|
2001 Employee Stock Option Plan.(1)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.12
|
|
2002 Employee Stock Option Plan.(1)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.13
|
|
2003 Stock Option Plan.(1)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.14
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to 2003 Stock Option Plan, dated
January 31, 2005.(8)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.15
|
|
Form of Stock Option Agreement pursuant to the 2003 Stock Option
Plan.(8)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.16
|
|
Amended and Restated 2003 Employees Stock Option Plan.(4)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.17
|
|
2003 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan.(1)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.18
|
|
2003 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended
and restated.(4)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.19
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement pursuant to the
2003 Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan, as amended
and restated as of February 15, 2006.(9)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.20
|
|
Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement pursuant to the 2003
Non-Employee Directors Stock Option Plan.(10)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.21
|
|
Restricted Stock Unit Agreement pursuant to the 2003 Stock
Option Plan.(11)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.22
|
|
Non-employee Director Compensation summary.(12)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.23
|
|
Executive Change in Control Severance Agreement.(13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.24
|
|
Retirement Term Sheet relating to Douglas S. Schatz.(14)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.25
|
|
Offer Letter to Hans-Georg Betz dated June 30, 2005.(15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.26
|
|
Offer letter, dated August 14, 2010, by and among Advanced
Energy Industries, Inc. and Danny C. Herron.(31)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.27
|
|
Executive Change in Control Severance Agreement dated
June 30, 2005 by and between Advanced Energy Industries,
Inc. and Hans-Georg Betz.(15)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.28
|
|
Executive Change in Control Agreement, dated March 29,
2008, by and among Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and Hans
Georg Betz.(19)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.29
|
|
Executive Change in Control Agreement, dated March 29,
2008, by and among Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and Lawrence
D. Firestone.(19)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.30
|
|
Executive Change in Control Agreement, dated March 29,
2008, by and among Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and Yuval
Wasserman.(19)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.31
|
|
Executive Change in Control Agreement, dated August 14,
2010, by and among Advanced Energy Industries Inc. and Danny C.
Herron.(32)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.32
|
|
Master Executive Separation Agreement, dated August 11,
2010, by and among Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and Lawrence
D. Firestone.(31)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.33
|
|
Global Supply Agreement by and between Advanced Energy
Industries, Inc. and Applied Materials Inc. dated
August 29, 2005.(16)+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.34
|
|
Shipping Amendment to the Global Supply Agreement by and between
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and Applied Materials Inc.
dated August 29, 2005. (16)+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.35
|
|
Non-Employee Director Compensation Structure.(17)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.36
|
|
Leadership Corporate Incentive Plan.(35)*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.37
|
|
2008 Omnibus Incentive Plan, as amended May 4, 2010.
|
80
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.38
|
|
Auction Rate Securities Rights Agreement dated October 8,
2008 by and between Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and UBS
Financial Services, Inc.(22)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.39
|
|
Credit Line Account Application and Agreement for Organizations
and Businesses, executed by Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. on
April 30, 2009, by and between Advanced Energy Industries,
Inc. and UBS Bank USA.(23)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.40
|
|
Addendum to Credit Line Account Application and Agreement,
executed by Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. on April 30,
2009, by and among Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., UBS Bank
USA and UBS Financial Services Inc.(23)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.41
|
|
Addendum to Credit Line Agreement, executed by Advanced Energy
Industries, Inc. on April 30, 2009, by and between Advanced
Energy Industries, Inc. and UBS Bank USA.(23)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.42
|
|
Important Notice on Interest Rates and Payments, executed by
Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. on April 30, 2009, by and
between Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and UBS Bank USA.(23)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.43
|
|
Form of Director Indemnification Agreement.(24)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.44
|
|
Agreement and Plan of Merger by and among Advanced Energy
Industries, Inc., PV Powered, Inc. and Neptune Acquisition Sub,
Inc., dated as of March 24, 2010.(25)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.45
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Agreement and Plan of Merger by and
among Advanced Energy Industries, Inc., PV Powered, Inc. and
Neptune Acquisition Sub, Inc., dated as of April 21,
2010.(26)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.46
|
|
Amendment No. 2 to Merger Agreement by and among Advanced
Energy Industries, Inc., PV Powered, Inc. and Neptune
Acquisition Sub, Inc., dated as of October 30, 2010.(34)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.47
|
|
Advisory Agreement by and between Advanced Energy Industries,
Inc. and Elwood Spedden, dated as of May 3, 2010.(27)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.48
|
|
Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of July 21, 2010, by and
among Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. and Hitachi Metals,
Ltd.(30)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
.49
|
|
Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement by and between Advanced
Energy Industries, Inc. and Hitachi Metals, Ltd., dated as of
October 15, 2010.(31)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14
|
.1
|
|
Code of Ethical Conduct, as revised.(18)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
|
.1
|
|
Subsidiaries of Advanced Energy Industries, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23
|
.1
|
|
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
.2
|
|
Certification of the Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13a-14(a)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as adopted pursuant
to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
.1
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32
|
.2
|
|
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to
18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (File
No. 000-26966),
filed November 4, 2003. |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Registration
Statement on
Form S-1
(File No.
33-97188),
filed September 2, 1995, as amended. |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
(File No.
000-26966),
filed December 5, 2007. |
|
(4) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 (File
No. 000-26966),
filed August 3, 2007. |
81
|
|
|
(5) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2000 (File
No. 000-26966),
filed March 27, 2001. |
|
(6) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2003 (File
No. 000-26966),
filed February 24, 2004. |
|
(7) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2001 (File
No. 000-26966),
filed May 9, 2001. |
|
(8) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
(File No.
000-26966),
filed February 3, 2005. |
|
(9) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
(File No.
000-26966),
filed May 31, 2006. |
|
(10) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2006 (File
No. 000-26966),
filed August 9, 2006. |
|
(11) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2005 (File
No. 000-26966),
filed March 28, 2006. |
|
(12) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
(File No.
000-26966),
filed February 1, 2006. |
|
(13) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
(File No.
000-26966),
filed March 31, 2005. |
|
(14) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
(File No.
000-26966),
filed August 9, 2005. |
|
(15) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
(File No.
000-26966),
filed July 6, 2005. |
|
(16) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Quarterly
Report on
Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2005 (File
No. 000-26966),
filed November 7, 2005. |
|
(17) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-26966),
filed July 28, 2006. |
|
(18) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-26966),
filed May 1, 2007. |
|
(19) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
(File
No. 000-26966),
filed April 4, 2008. |
|
(20) |
|
Reserved. |
|
(21) |
|
Reserved. |
|
(22) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
for the year ended December 31, 2008 (File
No. 000-26966),
filed February 27, 2009. |
|
(23) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
(File No.
000-26966),
filed June 5, 2009. |
|
(24) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
(File No.
000-26966),
filed December 14, 2009. |
|
(25) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
(File No.
000-26966),
filed March 24, 2010. |
|
(26) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
(File No.
000-26966),
filed April 22, 2010. |
|
(27) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 10-Q
(File No.
000-26966),
filed May 6, 2010. |
|
(28) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
(File No.
000-26966),
filed April 23, 2010. |
82
|
|
|
(29) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
(File No.
000-26966),
filed May 7, 2010. |
|
(30) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
(File No.
000-26966),
filed July 22, 2010. |
|
(31) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 10-Q
(File No.
000-26966),
filed November 5, 2010. |
|
(32) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
(File No.
000-26966),
filed August 16, 2010. |
|
(33) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
(File No.
000-26966),
filed August 20, 2010. |
|
(34) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Current
Report on
Form 8-K
(File No.
000-26966),
filed November 2, 2010. |
|
(35) |
|
Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Annual Report
on
Form 10-K
(File No.
000-26966),
filed February 26, 2010. |
|
|
|
+ |
|
Confidential treatment has been granted for portions of this
agreement. |
83
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this Annual Report on
Form 10-K
to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
ADVANCED ENERGY INDUSTRIES, INC.
(Registrant)
Hans Georg Betz
Chief Executive Officer
Date: March 2, 2011
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, this Annual Report has been signed below by the following
persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on
the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Signatures
|
|
Title
|
|
Date
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Hans
Georg Betz
Hans
Georg Betz
|
|
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
|
March 2, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Danny
C. Herron
Danny
C. Herron
|
|
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
|
March 2, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Douglas
S. Schatz
Douglas
S. Schatz
|
|
Chairman of the Board
|
|
March 2, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Frederick
A. Ball
Frederick
A. Ball
|
|
Director
|
|
March 2, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Richard
P. Beck
Richard
P. Beck
|
|
Director
|
|
March 2, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Trung
T. Doan
Trung
T. Doan
|
|
Director
|
|
March 2, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Edward
C. Grady
Edward
C. Grady
|
|
Director
|
|
March 2, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Terry
Hudgens
Terry
Hudgens
|
|
Director
|
|
March 2, 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Thomas
M. Rohrs
Thomas
M. Rohrs
|
|
Director
|
|
March 2, 2011
|
84