e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2006
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For
the transition period from ___ to ___.
Commission file number: 1-14323
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.
(Exact name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
|
|
76-0568219
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
|
|
2727 North Loop West, Houston, Texas
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
|
|
77008
(Zip Code) |
(713) 880-6500
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ
|
|
Accelerated filer o
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
Yes o No þ
There were 408,699,837 common units of Enterprise Products Partners L.P. outstanding at May 1,
2006. These common units trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol EPD.
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION.
Item 1. Financial Statements.
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
34,991 |
|
|
$ |
42,098 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
5,907 |
|
|
|
14,952 |
|
Accounts and notes receivable trade, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
of $20,585 at March 31, 2006 and $25,849 at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
1,088,121 |
|
|
|
1,448,026 |
|
Accounts receivable related parties |
|
|
11,696 |
|
|
|
6,557 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
255,415 |
|
|
|
339,606 |
|
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
107,774 |
|
|
|
120,208 |
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
1,503,904 |
|
|
|
1,971,447 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
8,825,047 |
|
|
|
8,689,024 |
|
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
463,532 |
|
|
|
471,921 |
|
Intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization of $184,309 at
March 31, 2006 and $163,121 at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
930,069 |
|
|
|
913,626 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
494,033 |
|
|
|
494,033 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
4,821 |
|
|
|
3,606 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
97,099 |
|
|
|
47,359 |
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
12,318,505 |
|
|
$ |
12,591,016 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable trade |
|
$ |
199,245 |
|
|
$ |
265,699 |
|
Accounts payable related parties |
|
|
4,507 |
|
|
|
23,367 |
|
Accrued gas payables |
|
|
1,197,878 |
|
|
|
1,372,837 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
27,727 |
|
|
|
30,294 |
|
Accrued interest |
|
|
71,233 |
|
|
|
71,193 |
|
Other current liabilities |
|
|
132,962 |
|
|
|
126,881 |
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
1,633,552 |
|
|
|
1,890,271 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
4,396,315 |
|
|
|
4,833,781 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
113,093 |
|
|
|
84,486 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
115,196 |
|
|
|
103,169 |
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Partners equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units (407,959,188 units outstanding at March 31, 2006
and 389,109,564 units outstanding at December 31, 2005) |
|
|
5,916,557 |
|
|
|
5,542,700 |
|
Restricted common units (740,649 units outstanding at March 31, 2006
and 751,604 units outstanding at December 31, 2005) |
|
|
4,671 |
|
|
|
18,638 |
|
General partner |
|
|
120,839 |
|
|
|
113,496 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
|
|
18,282 |
|
|
|
19,072 |
|
Deferred compensation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(14,597 |
) |
|
|
|
Total partners equity |
|
|
6,060,349 |
|
|
|
5,679,309 |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and partners equity |
|
$ |
12,318,505 |
|
|
$ |
12,591,016 |
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
2
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED OPERATIONS
AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Dollars in thousands, except per unit amounts)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
REVENUES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third parties |
|
$ |
3,159,999 |
|
|
$ |
2,497,329 |
|
Related parties |
|
|
90,075 |
|
|
|
58,193 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
3,250,074 |
|
|
|
2,555,522 |
|
|
|
|
COST AND EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third parties |
|
|
2,945,220 |
|
|
|
2,318,073 |
|
Related parties |
|
|
101,643 |
|
|
|
65,571 |
|
|
|
|
Total operating costs and expenses |
|
|
3,046,863 |
|
|
|
2,383,644 |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Third parties |
|
|
2,732 |
|
|
|
5,018 |
|
Related parties |
|
|
11,008 |
|
|
|
9,675 |
|
|
|
|
Total general and administrative costs |
|
|
13,740 |
|
|
|
14,693 |
|
|
|
|
Total costs and expenses |
|
|
3,060,603 |
|
|
|
2,398,337 |
|
|
|
|
EQUITY IN INCOME OF UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES |
|
|
4,029 |
|
|
|
8,279 |
|
|
|
|
OPERATING INCOME |
|
|
193,500 |
|
|
|
165,464 |
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(58,077 |
) |
|
|
(53,413 |
) |
Other, net |
|
|
1,969 |
|
|
|
919 |
|
|
|
|
Other expense |
|
|
(56,108 |
) |
|
|
(52,494 |
) |
INCOME BEFORE PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES,
MINORITY INTEREST AND CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE |
|
|
137,392 |
|
|
|
112,970 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(2,892 |
) |
|
|
(1,769 |
) |
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE MINORITY INTEREST AND
CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE |
|
|
134,500 |
|
|
|
111,201 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(2,198 |
) |
|
|
(1,945 |
) |
|
|
|
INCOME BEFORE CHANGE IN ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLE |
|
|
132,302 |
|
|
|
109,256 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle (see Note 3) |
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
|
133,777 |
|
|
|
109,256 |
|
Amortization of cash flow financing hedges |
|
|
(1,041 |
) |
|
|
(995 |
) |
Change in fair value of commodity hedges |
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
(1,434 |
) |
|
|
|
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
$ |
132,987 |
|
|
$ |
106,827 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ALLOCATION OF NET INCOME: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited partners interest in net income |
|
$ |
112,369 |
|
|
$ |
93,723 |
|
|
|
|
General partner interest in net income |
|
$ |
21,408 |
|
|
$ |
15,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER UNIT: (see Note 14) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic income per unit before change in accounting principle |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
Basic income per unit |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per unit before change in accounting principle |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted income per unit |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
3
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
133,777 |
|
|
$ |
109,256 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash flows provided from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and accretion in operating costs and expenses |
|
|
104,816 |
|
|
|
99,965 |
|
Depreciation and amortization in general and administrative costs |
|
|
1,501 |
|
|
|
1,922 |
|
Amortization in interest expense |
|
|
250 |
|
|
|
(477 |
) |
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(4,029 |
) |
|
|
(8,279 |
) |
Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
8,253 |
|
|
|
21,838 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
(1,475 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Operating lease expense paid by EPCO, Inc. |
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
2,198 |
|
|
|
1,945 |
|
Gain on sale of assets |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(5,436 |
) |
Deferred income tax expense |
|
|
1,487 |
|
|
|
1,802 |
|
Changes in fair market value of financial instruments |
|
|
(53 |
) |
|
|
102 |
|
Net effect of changes in operating accounts (see Note 17) |
|
|
247,084 |
|
|
|
(58,920 |
) |
|
|
|
Net cash provided from operating activities |
|
|
494,276 |
|
|
|
164,246 |
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital expenditures |
|
|
(278,698 |
) |
|
|
(175,230 |
) |
Contributions in aid of construction costs |
|
|
12,180 |
|
|
|
8,942 |
|
Proceeds from sale of assets |
|
|
75 |
|
|
|
42,158 |
|
Decrease in restricted cash |
|
|
9,045 |
|
|
|
15,799 |
|
Cash used for business combinations and asset purchases |
|
|
(38,100 |
) |
|
|
(150,478 |
) |
Acquisition of intangible asset |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,750 |
) |
Advances to Jonah affiliate (see Note 13) |
|
|
(53,549 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
(7,979 |
) |
|
|
(80,569 |
) |
Advances (to) from unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
8,381 |
|
|
|
(8,065 |
) |
|
|
|
Cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(348,645 |
) |
|
|
(349,193 |
) |
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Borrowings under debt agreements |
|
|
510,000 |
|
|
|
1,382,175 |
|
Repayments of debt |
|
|
(920,000 |
) |
|
|
(1,500,979 |
) |
Debt issuance costs |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,425 |
) |
Distributions paid to partners |
|
|
(193,543 |
) |
|
|
(164,692 |
) |
Distributions paid to minority interests |
|
|
(1,495 |
) |
|
|
(1,330 |
) |
Contributions from minority interests |
|
|
11,372 |
|
|
|
6,327 |
|
Net proceeds from issuance of common units |
|
|
440,928 |
|
|
|
501,045 |
|
|
|
|
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(152,738 |
) |
|
|
218,121 |
|
|
|
|
NET CHANGE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
|
(7,107 |
) |
|
|
33,174 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, JANUARY 1 |
|
|
42,098 |
|
|
|
24,556 |
|
|
|
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, MARCH 31 |
|
$ |
34,991 |
|
|
$ |
57,730 |
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
4
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.
UNAUDITED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED PARTNERS EQUITY
(See Note 11 for Unit History and Detail of Changes in Limited Partners Equity)
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
Limited |
|
General |
|
Deferred |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
|
Partners |
|
Partner |
|
Compensation |
|
Income |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
5,561,338 |
|
|
$ |
113,496 |
|
|
$ |
(14,597 |
) |
|
$ |
19,072 |
|
|
$ |
5,679,309 |
|
Net income |
|
|
112,369 |
|
|
|
21,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
133,777 |
|
Operating leases paid by EPCO, Inc. |
|
|
517 |
|
|
|
11 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
528 |
|
Cash distributions to partners |
|
|
(170,564 |
) |
|
|
(22,595 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(193,159 |
) |
Unit option reimbursements to EPCO, Inc. |
|
|
(376 |
) |
|
|
(8 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(384 |
) |
Net proceeds from sales of common units |
|
|
431,391 |
|
|
|
8,804 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
440,195 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of unit options |
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
733 |
|
Change in accounting method for equity awards (see Note
3) |
|
|
(15,814 |
) |
|
|
(322 |
) |
|
|
14,597 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,539 |
) |
Amortization of equity awards |
|
|
1,649 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,679 |
|
Change in fair value of commodity hedges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251 |
|
|
|
251 |
|
Interest rate hedging financial instruments recorded as
cash flow hedges: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of gain as component of interest expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,041 |
) |
|
|
(1,041 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
5,921,228 |
|
|
$ |
120,839 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
18,282 |
|
|
$ |
6,060,349 |
|
|
|
|
See Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
5
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P.
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Partnership Organization and Basis of Financial Statement Presentation
Partnership Organization and Formation
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. is a publicly traded Delaware limited partnership, the
common units of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the ticker symbol
EPD. Unless the context requires otherwise, references to we, us, our, or Enterprise
Products Partners are intended to mean the consolidated business and operations of Enterprise
Products Partners L.P. and its subsidiaries.
We were formed in April 1998 to own and operate certain natural gas liquids (NGLs) related
businesses of EPCO, Inc. (EPCO). We conduct substantially all of our business through our wholly
owned subsidiary, Enterprise Products Operating L.P. (our Operating Partnership). We are owned
98% by our limited partners and 2% by Enterprise Products GP, LLC (our general partner, referred to
as Enterprise Products GP). Enterprise Products GP is owned 100% by Enterprise GP Holdings L.P.
(Enterprise GP Holdings), a publicly traded affiliate, the common units of which are listed on
the NYSE under the ticker symbol EPE. The general partner of Enterprise GP Holdings is EPE
Holdings, LLC (EPE Holdings), a wholly owned subsidiary of Dan Duncan LLC, the membership
interests of which is owned by Dan L. Duncan. We, Enterprise Products GP, Enterprise GP Holdings,
EPE Holdings and Dan Duncan LLC are affiliates and under common control of Dan L. Duncan, the
Chairman and controlling shareholder of EPCO.
References to TEPPCO mean TEPPCO Partners, L.P., which is a related party affiliate to us.
References to TEPPCO GP refer to the general partner of TEPPCO, which is wholly owned by a
private company subsidiary of EPCO.
Basis of Presentation of Consolidated Financial Statements
Our results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2006 are not necessarily
indicative of results expected for the full year.
Except per unit amounts, or as noted within the context of each footnote disclosure, the
dollar amounts presented in the tabular data within these footnote disclosures are stated in
thousands of dollars.
Essentially all of our assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses are recorded at the
Operating Partnership level in our consolidated financial statements. We act as guarantor of
certain of our Operating Partnerships debt obligations. See Note 18 for condensed consolidated
financial information of our Operating Partnership.
In our opinion, the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include
all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals necessary for fair presentation. Although
we believe the disclosures in these financial statements are adequate to make the information
presented not misleading, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual
financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States of America (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and
regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). These unaudited financial
statements should be read in conjunction with our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2005 (Commission File No. 1-14323).
6
2. General Accounting Policies and Related Matters
Use of estimates
In accordance with GAAP, we use estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during each reporting
period. Our actual results could differ from these estimates.
New accounting pronouncements
Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) 04-13, Accounting for Purchases and Sale of Inventory
With the Same Counterparty. This accounting guidance requires that two or more inventory
transactions with the same counterparty should be viewed as a single nonmonetary transaction, if
the transactions were entered into in contemplation of one another. Exchanges of inventory between
entities in the same line of business should be accounted for at fair value or recorded at carrying
amounts, depending on the classification of such inventory. This guidance was effective during the
first quarter of 2006, and our adoption of this guidance had no impact on our financial position,
results of operations or cash flows.
Financial statements change in accounting principle and reclassifications
In January 2006, we adopted the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(SFAS) 123(R), Share-Based Payment, which resulted in us recording a cumulative effect of
accounting change of $1.5 million. For additional information regarding our adoption of SFAS
123(R), see Note 3.
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years financial statements to conform
to the current year presentation. During the second quarter of 2005, we changed the classification
of changes in restricted cash in our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows to
present such changes as an investing activity. We previously presented such changes as an
operating activity. In the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows
for the three months ended March 31, 2005, we reclassified the change in restricted cash to be
consistent with our current presentation. This reclassification resulted in a $15.8 million
decrease to cash flows used in investing activities and a corresponding decrease to cash provided
from operating activities from the amounts previously presented for the three months ended March
31, 2005.
Accounting for employee benefit plans
Dixie Pipeline Company (Dixie), a consolidated subsidiary, directly employs the personnel
that operate its pipeline system and certain of these employees are eligible to participate in
Dixies defined contribution plan and pension and postretirement benefit plans. Due to the
immaterial nature of Dixies employee benefit plans to our consolidated financial position, results
of operations and cash flows, our discussion is limited to the following:
Defined contribution plan. Dixie contributed nominal amounts to its company-sponsored
defined contribution plan during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005.
Pension and postretirement benefit plans. Dixies net pension benefit costs were $0.2
million and $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Dixies
net postretirement benefit costs were nominal for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005.
During the remainder of 2006, Dixie expects to contribute approximately $0.3 million to its
postretirement benefit plan and between $2 million and $4.4 million to its pension plan.
7
3. Accounting for Equity Awards
Effective January 1, 2006, we began to account for our equity awards using the provisions of
SFAS 123(R). Historically, our equity awards were accounted for using the intrinsic value method
described in Accounting Principles Board Opinion (APB) 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to
Employees. SFAS 123(R) requires us to recognize compensation expense related to our equity awards
based on the fair value of the award at the grant date. The fair value of an equity award is
estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Under SFAS 123(R), the fair value of an
award is amortized to earnings on a straight-line basis over the requisite service or vesting
period.
Upon our adoption of SFAS 123(R), we recognized a cumulative effect of change in accounting
principle of $1.5 million (a benefit) based on SFAS 123(R)s requirement to recognize compensation
expense based upon the grant date fair value of an equity award and the application of an estimated
forfeiture rate to unvested awards. In addition, previously recognized deferred compensation of
$14.6 million related to nonvested (or restricted) common units was reversed on January 1, 2006.
Prior to our adoption of SFAS 123(R), we did not recognize any compensation expense related to
unit options; however, compensation expense was recognized in connection with awards granted by EPE
Unit L.P. (the Employee Partnership) and the issuance of nonvested units. The effects of
applying SFAS 123(R) during the first quarter of 2006 did not have a material effect on net income
or basic and diluted earnings per unit.
Since we adopted SFAS 123(R) using the modified prospective method, we have not restated the
financial statements of prior periods. The following table shows the pro forma effects on our
earnings for the three months ended March 31, 2005 as if the fair value method of SFAS 123,
Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation had been used instead of the intrinsic-value method of
APB 25. The only equity awards outstanding during the three months ended March 31, 2005 were unit
options and nonvested units.
|
|
|
|
|
Reported net income |
|
$ |
109,256 |
|
Additional unit option-based compensation
expense estimated using fair
value-based method |
|
|
(177 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Pro forma net income |
|
$ |
109,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
Basic and diluted earnings per unit: |
|
|
|
|
As reported and pro forma |
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unit options
Under EPCOs 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the 1998 Plan), non-qualified incentive options
to purchase a fixed number of our common units may be granted to EPCOs key employees who perform
management, administrative or operational functions for us. Generally, the exercise price of each
option granted is equivalent to the market price of the underlying equity at the date of grant. In
addition, options granted under the 1998 Plan have a weighted-average vesting period of four years
and remain exercisable for ten years from the date of grant.
EPCO purchases common units to fund its obligations under the 1998 Plan at fair value either
in the open market or from us. When employees exercise unit options, we reimburse EPCO for the
cash difference between the strike price paid by the employee and the actual purchase price paid by
EPCO for the units issued to the employee.
The fair value of each unit option is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model, which incorporates various assumptions including (i) expected life of the
options of seven years, (ii) risk-free interest rates ranging from 3.8% to 4.2%, (iii) expected
distribution yield on our common units ranging from 8.8% to 9.2%, and (iv) expected unit price
volatility on our common units ranging from 20% to 29%. In general, our assumption of expected
life represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding based on an
analysis of historical activity. Our selection of the risk-free interest rate is based on
published yields for U.S. government securities with comparable
8
terms. The expected distribution yield and unit price volatility on our units is estimated
based upon several factors, which include an analysis of our historical unit price volatility and
distribution yield over a period equal to the expected life of the option granted.
The information in the following table shows unit option activity under the 1998 Plan.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
average strike |
|
|
contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
price |
|
|
term (in years) |
|
|
Value (1) |
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
2,082,000 |
|
|
$ |
22.16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(29,000 |
) |
|
$ |
12.88 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
2,053,000 |
|
|
$ |
22.29 |
|
|
|
7.56 |
|
|
$ |
3,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
698,000 |
|
|
$ |
19.45 |
|
|
|
5.34 |
|
|
$ |
3,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Aggregate intrinsic value reflects fully vested unit options at March 31, 2006. |
The total intrinsic value of unit options exercised during the first quarter of 2006 was
$0.3 million. We recognized $0.1 million of compensation expense associated with unit options
during the first quarter of 2006. As of March 31, 2006, we expect to incur $1.1 million of
unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested unit options over a weighted-average period of
approximately three years. During the first quarter of 2006, we received cash of $0.7 million from
unit option exercises, and our option-related reimbursements to EPCO were $0.4 million.
Nonvested units
Under the 1998 Plan, we can issue nonvested (i.e., restricted) common units to key employees
of EPCO and directors of our general partner. The 1998 Plan provides for the issuance of 3,000,000
restricted common units, of which 2,186,264 remain authorized for issuance at March 31, 2006.
In general, our restricted unit awards entitle recipients to acquire the underlying common
units (at no cost to them) once the defined vesting period expires, subject to certain forfeiture
provisions. The restrictions on the nonvested units generally lapse four years from the date of
grant. Compensation expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The
grant date fair value of nonvested units is estimated on the date of grant based on the market
price of our common units.
The following table provides a summary of our nonvested units in total at December 31, 2005
and changes during the first quarter of 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted- |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
average grant |
|
|
|
Units |
|
|
date fair value |
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at December 31, 2005 |
|
|
751,604 |
|
|
$ |
24.49 |
|
Granted |
|
|
17,500 |
|
|
$ |
24.95 |
|
Vested |
|
|
(2,434 |
) |
|
$ |
25.90 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(26,021 |
) |
|
$ |
23.90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at March 31, 2006 |
|
|
740,649 |
|
|
$ |
24.52 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The total fair value of restricted units that vested during the first quarter of 2006 was
$0.1 million. During the first quarter of 2006, we recognized $0.7 million of compensation expense
associated with nonvested units. As of March 31, 2006, we expect to incur $9.3 million of
unrecognized compensation cost, related to nonvested units issued to EPCO employees that work on
our behalf, over a weighted-average period of approximately 2 years.
9
Employee Partnership
In connection with the initial public offering of Enterprise GP Holdings in August 2005, the
Employee Partnership was formed to serve as an incentive arrangement for certain employees of EPCO
through a profits interest in the Employee Partnership. At inception, the Employee Partnership
used $51 million in contributions it received from an affiliate of EPCO (which was admitted as the
Class A limited partner of the Employee Partnership) to purchase 1,821,428 units of Enterprise GP
Holdings in August 2005. Certain EPCO employees, including all of EPE Holdings and Enterprise
Products GPs executive officers other than Dan L. Duncan, have been issued Class B limited partner
interests without any capital contribution and admitted as Class B limited partners of the Employee
Partnership.
As described in its partnership agreement, the Employee Partnership will be liquidated the
earlier of (i) August 2010 or (ii) a change in control of Enterprise GP Holdings or its general
partner. Upon liquidation of the Employee Partnership, units having a fair market value equal to
the Class A limited partners capital base will be distributed to the Class A limited partner, plus
any Class A preferred return for the quarter in which liquidation occurs. Any remaining units
will be distributed to the Class B limited partners as a residual profits interest in the Employee
Partnership as an award.
Prior to our adoption of SFAS 123(R), the estimated value of the profits interest was
accounted for similar to a stock appreciation right. Upon our adoption of SFAS 123(R), we began
recognizing compensation expense based upon the estimated grant date fair value of the Class B
partnership equity awards.
The fair value of the Class B partnership equity awards was estimated on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model, which incorporates various assumptions. We used the
following assumptions to estimate the fair value of these equity awards: (i) expected life of
award of five years; (ii) risk-free interest rate of 4.1%; (iii) expected dividend yield on units
of Enterprise GP Holdings of 3% and (iv) expected Enterprise GP Holdings unit price volatility of
30%. In general, the assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model to estimate the
fair value of the Class B partnership equity awards are similar to those used to estimate the fair
value of Enterprise Products Partners unit options.
During the first quarter of 2006, we recognized $0.6 of compensation expense associated with
profits interests. At March 31, 2006, there was $10.7 million of total unrecognized compensation
cost related to profits interests, which is expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis
through the third quarter of 2010.
4. Financial Instruments
We are exposed to financial market risks, including changes in commodity prices and interest
rates. We may use financial instruments (i.e., futures, forwards, swaps, options and other
financial instruments with similar characteristics) to mitigate the risks of certain identifiable
and anticipated transactions. In general, the type of risks we attempt to hedge are those related
to the variability of future earnings, fair values of certain debt instruments and cash flows
resulting from changes in applicable interest rates or commodity prices. As a matter of policy, we
do not use financial instruments for speculative (or trading) purposes.
Interest Rate Risk Hedging Program
Our interest rate exposure results from variable and fixed rate borrowings under debt
agreements. We manage a portion of our interest rate exposures by utilizing interest rate swaps
and similar arrangements, which allow us to convert a portion of fixed rate debt into variable rate
debt or a portion of variable rate debt into fixed rate debt.
10
As summarized in the following table, we had eleven interest rate swap agreements outstanding
at March 31, 2006 that were accounted for as fair value hedges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Period Covered |
|
Termination |
|
Fixed to |
|
Notional |
Hedged Fixed Rate Debt |
|
Of Swaps |
|
by Swap |
|
Date of Swap |
|
Variable Rate (1) |
|
Amount |
|
Senior Notes B, 7.50% fixed rate, due Feb. 2011
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
Jan. 2004 to Feb. 2011
|
|
Feb. 2011
|
|
7.50% to 8.15%
|
|
$ 50 million |
Senior Notes C, 6.375% fixed rate, due Feb.
2013
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Jan. 2004 to Feb. 2013
|
|
Feb. 2013
|
|
6.375% to 6.69%
|
|
$200 million |
Senior Notes G, 5.6% fixed rate, due Oct. 2014
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
4th Qtr. 2004 to Oct. 2014
|
|
Oct. 2014
|
|
5.6% to 5.27%
|
|
$600 million |
Senior Notes K, 4.95% fixed rate, due June 2010
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
Aug. 2005 to June 2010
|
|
June 2010
|
|
4.95% to 4.99%
|
|
$200 million |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The variable rate indicated is the all-in variable rate for the current settlement period. |
The total fair value of these eleven interest rate swaps at March 31, 2006 and December
31, 2005, was a liability of $46.8 million and $19.2 million, respectively, with an offsetting
decrease in the fair value of the underlying debt. Interest expense for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005 reflects a $0.2 million and $4.6 million benefit from these swap
agreements, respectively.
Commodity Risk Hedging Program
The prices of natural gas, NGLs and petrochemical products are subject to fluctuations in
response to changes in supply, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are
beyond our control. In order to manage the risks associated with natural gas and NGLs, we may
enter into commodity financial instruments. The primary purpose of our commodity risk management
activities is to hedge our exposure to price risks associated with (i) natural gas purchases, (ii)
NGL production and inventories, (iii) related firm commitments, (iv) fluctuations in transportation
revenues where the underlying fees are based on natural gas index prices and (v) certain
anticipated transactions involving either natural gas or NGLs.
At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we had a limited number of commodity financial
instruments in our portfolio, which primarily consisted of economic hedges. The fair value of our
commodity financial instrument portfolio at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 was an asset of
$1.1 million and a liability of $0.1 million, respectively. We recorded nominal amounts of
earnings from our commodity financial instruments during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and
2005.
5. Inventories
Our inventory amounts were as follows at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Working inventory |
|
$ |
237,783 |
|
|
$ |
279,237 |
|
Forward-sales inventory |
|
|
17,632 |
|
|
|
60,369 |
|
|
|
|
Inventory |
|
$ |
255,415 |
|
|
$ |
339,606 |
|
|
|
|
Our regular trade (or working) inventory is comprised of inventories of natural gas,
NGLs, and petrochemical products that are available for sale or used in the provision of services.
The forward sales inventory is comprised of segregated NGL and natural gas volumes dedicated to the
fulfillment of forward-sales contracts. Both inventories are valued at the lower of average cost
or market.
Costs and expenses, as shown on our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Operations
and Comprehensive Income, include cost of sales related to inventories. For the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005, such consolidated cost of sales amounts were $2.7 billion and $2.1
billion, respectively.
Due to fluctuating commodity prices in the NGL, natural gas and petrochemical industry, we
recognize lower of cost or market adjustments when the carrying values of our inventories exceed
their net realizable value. These non-cash adjustments are charged to cost of sales within
operating costs and
11
expenses in the period they are recognized. For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, we
recognized $11.6 million and $9.6 million, respectively, of such adjustments.
6. Property, Plant and Equipment
Our property, plant and equipment and accumulated depreciation were as follows at the dates
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Useful Life |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
in Years |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Plants and pipelines (1) |
|
|
5-35 |
(5) |
|
$ |
8,361,372 |
|
|
$ |
8,209,580 |
|
Underground and other storage facilities (2) |
|
|
5-35 |
(6) |
|
|
563,174 |
|
|
|
549,923 |
|
Platforms and facilities (3) |
|
|
23-31 |
|
|
|
161,807 |
|
|
|
161,807 |
|
Transportation equipment (4) |
|
|
3-10 |
|
|
|
21,197 |
|
|
|
24,939 |
|
Land |
|
|
|
|
|
|
38,550 |
|
|
|
38,757 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
|
|
|
|
912,940 |
|
|
|
854,595 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,059,040 |
|
|
|
9,839,601 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,233,993 |
|
|
|
1,150,577 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
8,825,047 |
|
|
$ |
8,689,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Plants and pipelines includes processing plants; NGL, petrochemical, oil and natural gas pipelines; terminal loading and unloading facilities; office furniture
and equipment; buildings; laboratory and shop equipment; and related assets. |
|
(2) |
|
Underground and other storage facilities includes underground product storage caverns; storage tanks; water wells; and related assets. |
|
(3) |
|
Platforms and facilities includes offshore platforms and related facilities and other associated assets. |
|
(4) |
|
Transportation equipment includes vehicles and similar assets used in our operations. |
|
(5) |
|
In general, the estimated useful lives of major components of this category are: processing plants, 20-35 years; pipelines, 18-35 years (with some equipment at
5 years); terminal facilities, 10-35 years; office furniture and equipment, 3-20 years; buildings 20-35 years; and laboratory and shop equipment, 5-35 years. |
|
(6) |
|
In general, the estimated useful lives of major components of this category are: underground storage facilities, 20-35 years (with some components at 5 years);
storage tanks, 10-35 years; and water wells, 25-35 years (with some components at 5 years). |
Depreciation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was $83.5 million
and $78.9 million, respectively. Capitalized interest on our construction projects for the three
months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005 was $9.2 million and $4.4 million, respectively.
12
7. Investments in and Advances to Unconsolidated Affiliates
We own interests in a number of related businesses that are accounted for using the equity
method. Our investments in and advances to our unconsolidated affiliates are grouped according to
the business segment to which they relate. For a general discussion of our business segments, see
Note 12. The following table shows our investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates at
the dates indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership |
|
Investments in and advances to |
|
|
Percentage at |
|
Unconsolidated Affiliates at |
|
|
March 31, |
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
NGL Pipelines & Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Venice Energy Services Company, LLC (VESCO) |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
$ |
36,195 |
|
|
$ |
39,689 |
|
K/D/S Promix LLC (Promix) |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
57,816 |
|
|
|
65,103 |
|
Baton Rouge Fractionators LLC (BRF) |
|
|
32.3 |
% |
|
|
25,696 |
|
|
|
25,584 |
|
Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evangeline (1) |
|
|
49.5 |
% |
|
|
3,679 |
|
|
|
3,151 |
|
Coyote Gas Treating, LLC (Coyote) |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
1,191 |
|
|
|
1,493 |
|
Offshore Pipelines & Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poseidon Oil Pipeline Company, L.L.C. (Poseidon) |
|
|
36 |
% |
|
|
62,537 |
|
|
|
62,918 |
|
Cameron Highway Oil Pipeline Company (Cameron Highway) |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
62,081 |
|
|
|
58,207 |
|
Deepwater Gateway, L.L.C. (Deepwater Gateway) |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
114,840 |
|
|
|
115,477 |
|
Neptune Pipeline Company, L.L.C. (Neptune) |
|
|
25.67 |
% |
|
|
67,549 |
|
|
|
68,085 |
|
Nemo Gathering Company, LLC (Nemo) |
|
|
33.92 |
% |
|
|
12,465 |
|
|
|
12,157 |
|
Petrochemical Services: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baton Rouge Propylene Concentrator, LLC (BRPC) |
|
|
30 |
% |
|
|
14,588 |
|
|
|
15,212 |
|
La Porte (2) |
|
|
50 |
% |
|
|
4,895 |
|
|
|
4,845 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
463,532 |
|
|
$ |
471,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Refers to our ownership interests in Evangeline Gas Pipeline Company, L.P. and Evangeline Gas Corp., collectively. |
|
(2) |
|
Refers to our ownership interests in La Porte Pipeline Company, L.P. and La Porte GP, LLC, collectively. |
On occasion, the price we pay to acquire an investment exceeds the carrying value of the
underlying historical net assets (i.e., the underlying equity account balances on the books of the
investee) that we purchase. These excess cost amounts are a component of our investments in and
advances to unconsolidated affiliates. At March 31, 2006, our investments in Promix, La Porte,
Neptune, Poseidon, Cameron Highway and Nemo included excess cost. At March 31, 2006, excess cost
amounts included in our investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates totaled $47.6
million, which was attributed to tangible assets. Amortization of our excess cost amounts
attributed to tangible assets was $0.5 million and $0.7 million during the three months ended March
31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
The following table shows our equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates by business
segment for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
NGL Pipelines & Services |
|
$ |
1,518 |
|
|
$ |
4,448 |
|
Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services |
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
Offshore Pipelines & Services |
|
|
1,934 |
|
|
|
2,975 |
|
Petrochemical Services |
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
4,029 |
|
|
$ |
8,279 |
|
|
|
|
13
Summarized financial information of unconsolidated affiliates
The following table presents unaudited income statement data for our current unconsolidated
affiliates, aggregated by business segment, for the periods indicated (on a 100% basis).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summarized Income Statement Information for the Three Months Ended |
|
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
March 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
Net |
|
|
|
|
|
Operating |
|
Net |
|
|
Revenues |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Income (Loss) |
|
Revenues |
|
Income |
|
Income |
|
|
|
|
|
NGL Pipelines & Services (1) |
|
$ |
20,286 |
|
|
$ |
(22,125 |
) |
|
$ |
(21,678 |
) |
|
$ |
69,964 |
|
|
$ |
13,773 |
|
|
$ |
14,039 |
|
Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services |
|
|
82,342 |
|
|
|
2,342 |
|
|
|
1,192 |
|
|
|
53,354 |
|
|
|
2,147 |
|
|
|
1,072 |
|
Offshore Pipelines & Services |
|
|
31,696 |
|
|
|
10,930 |
|
|
|
3,680 |
|
|
|
30,364 |
|
|
|
14,910 |
|
|
|
8,903 |
|
Petrochemical Services |
|
|
3,868 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
210 |
|
|
|
4,095 |
|
|
|
1,129 |
|
|
|
1,141 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The decrease in earnings generated by the unconsolidated affiliates within our NGL Pipelines & Services segment is primarily attributable to losses incurred by
VESCO due to the effects of Hurricane Katrina. |
8. Business Combinations and Other Acquisitions
In January 2006, we announced our intent to purchase (i) the Pioneer natural gas processing
plant located in Opal, Wyoming and (ii) certain natural gas processing rights related to the Jonah
and Pinedale fields in the Greater Green River Basin in Wyoming from TEPPCO. We completed this
acquisition in March 2006 at a cost of $38.1 million.
Our acquisition of the Pioneer natural gas processing plant and associated natural gas
processing rights was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, the
cost has been allocated to the assets acquired based on estimated preliminary fair values as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
469 |
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
37,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
$ |
38,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total consideration given |
|
$ |
38,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Management independently developed the fair value estimates for our acquisition of the
Pioneer natural gas processing plant and associated natural gas processing rights using recognized
business valuation techniques. Upon completion of this acquisition, we commenced construction to
increase capacity at the existing Pioneer natural gas processing plant, and we have started work on
our announced Pioneer cryogenic natural gas processing facility. Upon completion of our Pioneer
cryogenic natural gas processing facility, we will have the capacity to process expected volumes of
natural gas from the Jonah and Pinedale fields under the rights that we purchased from an affiliate
of TEPPCO. See Note 9 for information regarding the intangible assets recorded in connection with
this acquisition.
14
9. Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Identifiable Intangible assets
The following table summarizes our intangible assets by segment (which primarily consist of
contracts and customer relationships) at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2006 |
|
At December 31, 2005 |
|
|
Gross |
|
Accum. |
|
Carrying |
|
Accum. |
|
Carrying |
|
|
Value |
|
Amort. |
|
Value |
|
Amort. |
|
Value |
|
|
|
NGL Pipelines & Services (1) |
|
$ |
392,894 |
|
|
$ |
(85,882 |
) |
|
$ |
307,012 |
|
|
$ |
(79,485 |
) |
|
$ |
275,778 |
|
Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services |
|
|
457,798 |
|
|
|
(52,413 |
) |
|
|
405,385 |
|
|
|
(43,955 |
) |
|
|
413,843 |
|
Offshore Pipelines & Services |
|
|
207,012 |
|
|
|
(38,314 |
) |
|
|
168,698 |
|
|
|
(32,480 |
) |
|
|
174,532 |
|
Petrochemical Services |
|
|
56,674 |
|
|
|
(7,700 |
) |
|
|
48,974 |
|
|
|
(7,201 |
) |
|
|
49,473 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,114,378 |
|
|
$ |
(184,309 |
) |
|
$ |
930,069 |
|
|
$ |
(163,121 |
) |
|
$ |
913,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2006, we recorded an additional $37.6 million of intangible assets due to our acquisition of the
Pioneer natural gas processing plant and associated natural gas processing rights. The value we assigned to these processing rights will be amortized to
earnings using methods that closely resemble the pattern in which the economic benefits of the underlying natural gas resource bases from which the
customers produce are estimated to be consumed or otherwise used. Our estimate of the useful life of each resource base is based on a number of factors,
including third-party reserve estimates, the economic viability of production and exploration activities and other industry factors. |
The following table shows amortization expense by segment associated with our intangible
assets for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
NGL Pipelines & Services |
|
$ |
6,361 |
|
|
$ |
6,427 |
|
Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services |
|
|
8,458 |
|
|
|
8,973 |
|
Offshore Pipelines & Services |
|
|
5,834 |
|
|
|
6,722 |
|
Petrochemical Services |
|
|
499 |
|
|
|
489 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
21,152 |
|
|
$ |
22,611 |
|
|
|
|
For the remainder of 2006, amortization expense associated with our intangible assets is
currently estimated at $61.3 million.
Goodwill
The following table summarizes our goodwill amounts by segment at March 31, 2006 and December
31, 2005. Of the $494 million of goodwill we have recorded, $387.1 million relates to goodwill we
recorded in connection with the merger of GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P. (GulfTerra) with a
wholly owned subsidiary of ours in September 2004 (the GulfTerra Merger).
|
|
|
|
|
NGL Pipelines & Services |
|
$ |
54,960 |
|
Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services |
|
|
282,997 |
|
Offshore Pipelines & Services |
|
|
82,386 |
|
Petrochemical Services |
|
73,690 |
|
Totals |
|
$ |
494,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
15
10. Debt Obligations
Our consolidated debt consisted of the following at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
Operating Partnership debt obligations: |
|
|
Multi-Year Revolving Credit Facility, variable rate, due October 2010 |
|
$ |
80,000 |
|
|
$ |
490,000 |
|
Pascagoula MBFC Loan, 8.70% fixed-rate, due March 2010 |
|
|
54,000 |
|
|
|
54,000 |
|
Senior Notes B, 7.50% fixed-rate, due February 2011 |
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
Senior Notes C, 6.375% fixed-rate, due February 2013 |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
Senior Notes D, 6.875% fixed-rate, due March 2033 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
Senior Notes E, 4.00% fixed-rate, due October 2007 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
Senior Notes F, 4.625% fixed-rate, due October 2009 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
Senior Notes G, 5.60% fixed-rate, due October 2014 |
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
650,000 |
|
Senior Notes H, 6.65% fixed-rate, due October 2034 |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
Senior Notes I, 5.00% fixed-rate, due March 2015 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
Senior Notes J, 5.75% fixed-rate, due March 2035 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
Senior Notes K, 4.950% fixed-rate, due June 2010 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
Dixie Revolving Credit Facility, variable rate, due June 2007 |
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
17,000 |
|
Debt obligations assumed from GulfTerra |
|
|
5,068 |
|
|
|
5,068 |
|
|
|
|
Total principal amount |
|
|
4,456,068 |
|
|
|
4,866,068 |
|
Other, including unamortized discounts and premiums and changes in fair value (1) |
|
|
(59,753 |
) |
|
|
(32,287 |
) |
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
4,396,315 |
|
|
$ |
4,833,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit outstanding |
|
$ |
47,888 |
|
|
$ |
33,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The March 31, 2006 amount includes $45.8 million related to fair value hedges and $13.9 million in net unamortized discounts. The December 31, 2005 amount
includes $18.2 million related to fair value hedges and $14.1 million in net unamortized discounts. |
Parent-Subsidiary guarantor relationships
At March 31, 2006, we act as guarantor of the debt obligations of our Operating Partnership,
with the exception of the Dixie revolving credit facility and senior subordinated notes assumed
from GulfTerra. If the Operating Partnership were to default on any debt we guarantee, we would be
responsible for full repayment of that obligation.
Operating Partnership debt obligations
There have been no significant changes in the terms of our Operating Partnerships debt
obligations since those reported in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005.
We generated net proceeds of $430 million in March 2006 in connection with the sale of
18,400,000 of our common units in an underwritten equity offering. Subsequently, this amount was
contributed to the Operating Partnership, which, in turn, used this amount to temporarily reduce
debt outstanding under its Multi-Year Revolving Credit Facility.
Covenants
We were in compliance with the covenants of our consolidated debt agreements at March 31, 2006
and December 31, 2005.
16
Information regarding variable interest rates paid
The following table shows the range of interest rates paid and weighted-average interest rate
paid on our consolidated variable-rate debt obligations during the first quarter of 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Range of |
|
Weighted-average |
|
|
interest rates |
|
interest rate |
|
|
paid |
|
paid |
Multi-Year Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
4.87% to 7.50%
|
|
|
5.08 |
% |
Dixie Revolving Credit Facility
|
|
4.67% to 5.07%
|
|
|
4.84 |
% |
Consolidated debt maturity table
The following table presents scheduled maturities of debt principal amounts over the next five
years and in total thereafter. No amounts are currently due in 2006 or 2008.
|
|
|
|
|
2007 |
|
$ |
517,000 |
|
2009 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
2010 |
|
|
639,068 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
2,800,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total scheduled principal payments |
|
$ |
4,456,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
Joint venture debt obligations
We have three unconsolidated affiliates with long-term debt obligations. The following table
shows (i) our ownership interest in each entity at March 31, 2006, (ii) total debt of each
unconsolidated affiliate at March 31, 2006 (on a 100% basis to the joint venture) and (iii) the
corresponding scheduled maturities of such debt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our |
|
|
|
|
|
Scheduled Maturities of Debt |
|
|
Ownership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After |
|
|
Interest |
|
Total |
|
2006 |
|
2007 |
|
2008 |
|
2009 |
|
2010 |
|
2010 |
|
Cameron Highway |
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
$ |
415,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
25,000 |
|
|
$ |
50,000 |
|
|
$ |
315,000 |
|
Poseidon |
|
|
36.0 |
% |
|
|
95,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
95,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Evangeline |
|
|
49.5 |
% |
|
|
30,650 |
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
5,000 |
|
|
|
10,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
540,650 |
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
5,000 |
|
|
$ |
125,000 |
|
|
$ |
30,000 |
|
|
$ |
60,650 |
|
|
$ |
315,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The credit agreements of our joint ventures contain various affirmative and negative
covenants, including financial covenants. Our joint ventures were in compliance with all such
covenants at March 31, 2006.
Amendment of Cameron Highway debt. In March 2006, Cameron Highway amended the note
purchase agreement governing its senior secured notes to primarily address the effect of reduced
deliveries of crude oil to Cameron Highway resulting from production delays caused by the lingering
effects of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. In general, this amendment modified certain financial
covenants in light of production forecasts. In addition, the amendment increased the letters of
credit required to be issued by our Operating Partnership and an affiliate of our joint venture
partner from $18.4 million each to $36.8 million each.
Also, the amendment specifies that Cameron Highway cannot make distributions to its partners
during the period beginning March 30, 2006 and ending on the earlier of (i) December 31, 2007 or
(ii) the date on which Cameron Highways debt service coverage ratios are not less than 1.5 to 1
for three consecutive fiscal quarters. In order for Cameron Highway to resume paying
distributions to its partners, no default or event of default can be present or continuing at the
date Cameron Highway desires to start paying such distributions.
17
11. Partners Equity
Our common units represent limited partner interests, which give the holders thereof the right
to participate in distributions and to exercise the other rights or privileges available to them
under our Fifth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (together with all amendments
thereto, the Partnership Agreement). We are managed by our general partner, Enterprise Products
GP.
Capital accounts
In accordance with our Partnership Agreement, capital accounts are maintained for our general
partner and our limited partners. The capital account provisions of our Partnership Agreement
incorporate principles established for U.S. Federal income tax purposes and are not comparable to
the equity accounts reflected under GAAP in our consolidated financial statements.
Our Partnership Agreement sets forth the calculation to be used in determining the amount and
priority of cash distributions that our limited partners and general partner will receive. The
Partnership Agreement also contains provisions for the allocation of net earnings and losses to our
limited partners and general partner. For purposes of maintaining partner capital accounts, the
Partnership Agreement specifies that items of income and loss shall be allocated among the partners
in accordance with their respective percentage interests. Normal income and loss allocations
according to percentage interests are done only after giving effect to priority earnings
allocations in an amount equal to incentive cash distributions allocated 100% to our general
partner.
Equity offerings and registration statements
In general, the Partnership Agreement authorizes us to issue an unlimited number of additional
limited partner interests and other equity securities for such consideration and on such terms and
conditions as may be established by Enterprise Products GP in its sole discretion (subject, under
certain circumstances, to the approval of our unitholders). The following table reflects the
number of common units issued and the net proceeds received from each public offering during the
first quarter of 2006:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Proceeds from Sale of Common Units |
|
|
Number of |
|
Contributed |
|
Contributed by |
|
|
Month of |
|
common units |
|
by Limited |
|
General |
|
|
Offering |
|
issued |
|
Partners |
|
Partner |
|
Total |
|
February 2006 |
|
|
418,190 |
|
|
$ |
9,972 |
|
|
$ |
203 |
|
|
$ |
10,175 |
|
March 2006 |
|
|
18,400,000 |
|
|
|
421,419 |
|
|
|
8,601 |
|
|
|
430,020 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18,818,190 |
|
|
$ |
431,391 |
|
|
$ |
8,804 |
|
|
$ |
440,195 |
|
|
|
|
We have a universal shelf registration statement on file with the SEC registering the issuance
of up to $4 billion of equity and debt securities. After taking into account the past issuance of
securities under this universal registration statement, we can issue approximately $3 billion of
additional securities under this registration statement as of March 31, 2006.
18
Summary of limited partner transactions
The following table details the changes in limited partners equity since December 31, 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited Partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
|
|
Common |
|
Common |
|
|
|
|
units |
|
units |
|
Total |
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
|
$ |
5,542,700 |
|
|
$ |
18,638 |
|
|
$ |
5,561,338 |
|
Net income |
|
|
112,156 |
|
|
|
213 |
|
|
|
112,369 |
|
Operating leases paid by EPCO |
|
|
516 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
517 |
|
Cash distributions to partners |
|
|
(170,235 |
) |
|
|
(329 |
) |
|
|
(170,564 |
) |
Unit option reimbursements to EPCO |
|
|
(376 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(376 |
) |
Net proceeds from sales of common units |
|
|
431,391 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
431,391 |
|
Proceeds from exercise of unit options |
|
|
718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
718 |
|
Change in accounting method for equity
awards (see Note 3) |
|
|
(896 |
) |
|
|
(14,918 |
) |
|
|
(15,814 |
) |
Amortization of equity awards |
|
|
583 |
|
|
|
1,066 |
|
|
|
1,649 |
|
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
5,916,557 |
|
|
$ |
4,671 |
|
|
$ |
5,921,228 |
|
|
|
|
Unit history
The following table details the outstanding balance of each class of units for the periods and
at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Limited Partners |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted |
|
|
Common |
|
Common |
|
|
Units |
|
Units |
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
|
|
389,109,564 |
|
|
|
751,604 |
|
Common units issued in February 2006 |
|
|
418,190 |
|
|
|
|
|
Common units issued in February 2006 in connection
with unit options |
|
|
29,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted common units issued in February 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,500 |
|
Vesting of restricted units in February 2006 |
|
|
2,434 |
|
|
|
(2,434 |
) |
Common units issued in connection with
March 2006 offering |
|
|
18,400,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeiture of restricted units in March 2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(26,021 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2006 |
|
|
407,959,188 |
|
|
|
740,649 |
|
|
|
|
Distributions
As an incentive, Enterprise Products GPs percentage interest in our quarterly cash
distributions is increased after certain specified target levels of quarterly distribution rates
are met. Enterprise Products GPs quarterly incentive distribution thresholds are as follows:
|
|
|
2% of quarterly cash distributions up to $0.253 per unit; |
|
|
|
|
15% of quarterly cash distributions from $0.253 per unit up to $0.3085 per unit; and |
|
|
|
|
25% of quarterly cash distributions that exceed $0.3085 per unit. |
On April 17, 2006, we announced that our quarterly distribution rate with respect to the first
quarter of 2006 would be $0.445 per common unit, or $1.78 on an annualized basis. This
distribution will be paid on May 10, 2006, to unitholders of record at the close of business on
April 28, 2006.
19
Accumulated other comprehensive income
The following table summarizes transactions affecting our accumulated other comprehensive
income since December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Fin. Instrs. |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward- |
|
Other |
|
|
Commodity |
|
|
|
|
|
Starting |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Financial |
|
Treasury |
|
Interest |
|
Income |
|
|
Instruments |
|
Locks |
|
Rate Swaps |
|
Balance |
|
|
|
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,127 |
|
|
$ |
14,945 |
|
|
$ |
19,072 |
|
Change in fair value of commodity financial instruments |
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251 |
|
Reclassification of gain on settlement of interest
rate financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(925 |
) |
|
|
(1,041 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
4,011 |
|
|
$ |
14,020 |
|
|
$ |
18,282 |
|
|
|
|
During the remainder of 2006, we will reclassify a combined $3.2 million from accumulated
other comprehensive income as a reduction in interest expense from our treasury locks and
forward-starting interest rate swaps.
12. Business Segments
We have four reportable business segments: NGL Pipelines & Services, Onshore Natural Gas
Pipelines & Services, Offshore Pipelines & Services and Petrochemical Services. Our business
segments are generally organized and managed according to the type of services rendered (or
technology employed) and products produced and/or sold.
We evaluate segment performance based on the non-GAAP financial measure of gross operating
margin. Gross operating margin (either in total or by individual segment) is an important
performance measure of the core profitability of our operations. This measure forms the basis of
our internal financial reporting and is used by senior management in deciding how to allocate
capital resources among business segments. We believe that investors benefit from having access to
the same financial measures that our management uses in evaluating segment results. The GAAP
measure most directly comparable to total segment gross operating margin is operating income. Our
non-GAAP financial measure of total segment gross operating margin should not be considered as an
alternative to GAAP operating income.
We define total (or consolidated) segment gross operating margin as operating income before:
(i) depreciation, amortization and accretion expense; (ii) operating lease expenses for which we do
not have the payment obligation; (iii) gains and losses on the sale of assets; and (iv) general and
administrative expenses. Gross operating margin is exclusive of other income and expense
transactions, provision for income taxes, minority interest, extraordinary charges and the
cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles. Gross operating margin by segment is
calculated by subtracting segment operating costs and expenses (net of the adjustments noted above)
from segment revenues, with both segment totals before the elimination of intersegment and
intrasegment transactions.
Segment revenues and operating costs and expenses include intersegment and intrasegment
transactions, which are generally based on transactions made at market-related rates. Our
consolidated revenues reflect the elimination of all material intercompany (both intersegment and
intrasegment) transactions.
Historically, we have included equity earnings from unconsolidated affiliates in our
measurement of segment gross operating margin and operating income. Our equity investments with
industry partners are a vital component of our business strategy. They are a means by which we
conduct our operations to align our interests with those of our customers, which may be suppliers
of raw materials or consumers of finished products. This method of operation also enables us to
achieve favorable economies of scale relative to the level of investment and business risk assumed
versus what we could accomplish on a stand-
20
alone basis. Many of these businesses perform supporting or complementary roles to our other
business operations.
Our integrated midstream energy asset system (including the midstream energy assets of our
equity method investees) provides services to producers and consumers of natural gas, NGLs and
petrochemicals. Our asset system has multiple entry points. In general, hydrocarbons can enter
our asset system through a number of ways, including an offshore natural gas or crude oil pipeline,
an offshore platform, a natural gas processing plant, an NGL gathering pipeline, an NGL
fractionator, an NGL storage facility, an NGL transportation or distribution pipeline or an onshore
natural gas pipeline. At each link along this asset system, we earn revenues based on volume or an
ownership of products such as NGLs.
Many of our equity investees are present within our integrated midstream asset system. For
example, we have ownership interests in several offshore natural gas and crude oil pipelines.
Other examples include our use of the Promix NGL fractionator to process NGLs extracted by our gas
plants. The NGLs received from Promix then can be sold in our NGL marketing activities. Given the
integral nature of our equity investees to our operations, we believe treatment of earnings from
our equity method investees as a component of gross operating margin and operating income is
appropriate.
Our consolidated revenues were earned in the United States and derived from a wide customer
base. Currently, our plant-based operations are located primarily in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi
and New Mexico. Our natural gas, NGL and crude oil pipelines are in a number of regions of the
United States including the Gulf of Mexico offshore Texas and Louisiana; the south and southeastern
United States (primarily in Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama); and certain regions of the
central and western United States. Our marketing activities are headquartered in Houston, Texas
and serve customers in a number of regions of the United States including the Gulf Coast, West
Coast and Mid-Continent areas.
Consolidated property, plant and equipment and investments in and advances to unconsolidated
affiliates are allocated to each segment on the basis of each assets or investments principal
operations. The principal reconciling item between consolidated property, plant and equipment and
the total value of segment assets is construction-in-progress. Segment assets represent the net
carrying value of facilities and projects that contribute to the gross operating margin of a
particular segment. Since assets under construction generally do not contribute to segment gross
operating margin, such assets are excluded from segment asset totals until they are deemed
operational. Consolidated intangible assets and goodwill are allocated to each segment based on
the classification of the assets to which they relate.
21
The following table shows our measurement of total segment gross operating margin for the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Revenues (1) |
|
$ |
3,250,074 |
|
|
$ |
2,555,522 |
|
Less: Operating costs and expenses (1) |
|
|
(3,046,863 |
) |
|
|
(2,383,644 |
) |
Add: Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates (1) |
|
|
4,029 |
|
|
|
8,279 |
|
Depreciation, amortization and accretion in operating costs and expenses (2) |
|
|
104,816 |
|
|
|
99,965 |
|
Operating lease expense paid by EPCO (2) |
|
|
528 |
|
|
|
528 |
|
Gain on sale of assets in operating costs and expenses (2) |
|
|
(61 |
) |
|
|
(5,436 |
) |
|
|
|
Total segment gross operating margin |
|
$ |
312,523 |
|
|
$ |
275,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
These amounts are taken from our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Operations and Comprehensive Income. |
|
(2) |
|
These non-cash expenses are taken from the operating activities section of our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows. |
A reconciliation of our measurement of total segment gross operating margin to operating
income and income before provision for income taxes, minority interest and the cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Total segment gross operating margin |
|
$ |
312,523 |
|
|
$ |
275,214 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile total segment gross operating margin
to operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and accretion in operating costs and expenses |
|
|
(104,816 |
) |
|
|
(99,965 |
) |
Operating lease expense paid by EPCO |
|
|
(528 |
) |
|
|
(528 |
) |
Gain on sale of assets in operating costs and expenses |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
5,436 |
|
General and administrative costs |
|
|
(13,740 |
) |
|
|
(14,693 |
) |
|
|
|
Consolidated operating income |
|
|
193,500 |
|
|
|
165,464 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
(56,108 |
) |
|
|
(52,494 |
) |
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes, minority interest
and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
$ |
137,392 |
|
|
$ |
112,970 |
|
|
|
|
22
Information by segment, together with reconciliations to our consolidated totals, is
presented in the following table:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Segments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGL |
|
Onshore |
|
Offshore |
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments |
|
|
|
|
Pipelines |
|
Pipelines |
|
Pipelines |
|
Petrochemical |
|
and |
|
Consolidated |
|
|
& Services |
|
& Services |
|
& Services |
|
Services |
|
Eliminations |
|
Totals |
|
|
|
Revenues from third parties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
2,338,696 |
|
|
$ |
413,001 |
|
|
$ |
22,352 |
|
|
$ |
385,950 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
3,159,999 |
|
Three months ended March 31, 2005 |
|
|
1,857,454 |
|
|
|
246,934 |
|
|
|
29,548 |
|
|
|
363,393 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,497,329 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from related parties: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
6,948 |
|
|
|
82,955 |
|
|
|
172 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
90,075 |
|
Three months ended March 31, 2005 |
|
|
1,762 |
|
|
|
56,215 |
|
|
|
186 |
|
|
|
30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
58,193 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intersegment and intrasegment revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
896,245 |
|
|
|
28,141 |
|
|
|
313 |
|
|
|
82,817 |
|
|
$ |
(1,007,516 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2005 |
|
|
729,677 |
|
|
|
10,017 |
|
|
|
196 |
|
|
|
54,750 |
|
|
|
(794,640 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
3,241,889 |
|
|
|
524,097 |
|
|
|
22,837 |
|
|
|
468,767 |
|
|
|
(1,007,516 |
) |
|
|
3,250,074 |
|
Three months ended March 31, 2005 |
|
|
2,588,893 |
|
|
|
313,166 |
|
|
|
29,930 |
|
|
|
418,173 |
|
|
|
(794,640 |
) |
|
|
2,555,522 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity in income in unconsolidated affiliates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
1,518 |
|
|
|
602 |
|
|
|
1,934 |
|
|
|
(25 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4,029 |
|
Three months ended March 31, 2005 |
|
|
4,448 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
2,975 |
|
|
|
276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,279 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross operating margin by individual
business segment and in total: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended March 31, 2006 |
|
|
170,950 |
|
|
|
96,803 |
|
|
|
17,252 |
|
|
|
27,518 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
312,523 |
|
Three months ended March 31, 2005 |
|
|
153,304 |
|
|
|
79,358 |
|
|
|
23,224 |
|
|
|
19,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
275,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2006 |
|
|
3,091,345 |
|
|
|
3,575,775 |
|
|
|
740,252 |
|
|
|
504,735 |
|
|
|
912,940 |
|
|
|
8,825,047 |
|
At December 31, 2005 |
|
|
3,075,048 |
|
|
|
3,622,318 |
|
|
|
632,222 |
|
|
|
504,841 |
|
|
|
854,595 |
|
|
|
8,689,024 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in and advances
to unconsolidated affiliates (see Note 7): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2006 |
|
|
119,707 |
|
|
|
4,870 |
|
|
|
319,472 |
|
|
|
19,483 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
463,532 |
|
At December 31, 2005 |
|
|
130,376 |
|
|
|
4,644 |
|
|
|
316,844 |
|
|
|
20,057 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
471,921 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible Assets (see Note 9): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2006 |
|
|
307,012 |
|
|
|
405,385 |
|
|
|
168,698 |
|
|
|
48,974 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
930,069 |
|
At December 31, 2005 |
|
|
275,778 |
|
|
|
413,843 |
|
|
|
174,532 |
|
|
|
49,473 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
913,626 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill (see Note 9): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At March 31, 2006 |
|
|
54,960 |
|
|
|
282,997 |
|
|
|
82,386 |
|
|
|
73,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
494,033 |
|
At December 31, 2005 |
|
|
54,960 |
|
|
|
282,997 |
|
|
|
82,386 |
|
|
|
73,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
494,033 |
|
Revenues from the marketing of NGL products within the NGL Pipelines & Services business
segment accounted for 67% of total consolidated revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2006
and 2005. Revenues from the marketing of petrochemical products within the Petrochemical Services
segment accounted for 11% and 13% of total consolidated revenues for the three months ended March
31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Revenues from the transportation, sale and storage of natural gas
using onshore assets accounted for 15% and 12% of total consolidated revenues for the three months
ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
23
13. Related Party Transactions
The following table summarizes our related party transactions for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Revenues from consolidated operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPCO and affiliates |
|
$ |
5,632 |
|
|
$ |
284 |
|
Unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
84,443 |
|
|
|
57,909 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
90,075 |
|
|
$ |
58,193 |
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPCO and affiliates |
|
$ |
94,957 |
|
|
$ |
59,003 |
|
Unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
6,686 |
|
|
|
6,568 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
101,643 |
|
|
$ |
65,571 |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPCO and affiliates |
|
$ |
11,008 |
|
|
$ |
9,675 |
|
|
|
|
Relationship with EPCO and affiliates
General. We have an extensive and ongoing relationship with EPCO and its affiliates,
which include the following significant entities:
|
§ |
|
EPCO and its private company subsidiaries; |
|
|
§ |
|
Enterprise Products GP, our sole general partner; |
|
|
§ |
|
Enterprise GP Holdings, which owns and controls our general partner; |
|
|
§ |
|
the Employee Partnership; and |
|
|
§ |
|
TEPPCO and its general partner (TEPPCO GP), which are controlled by affiliates of EPCO. |
Unless noted otherwise, our agreements with EPCO are not the result of arms length
transactions. As a result, we cannot provide assurance that the terms and provisions of such
agreements are at least as favorable to us as we could have obtained from unaffiliated third
parties.
EPCO is a private company controlled by Dan L. Duncan, who is also a director and Chairman of
Enterprise Products GP, our general partner. At March 31, 2006, EPCO and its affiliates
beneficially owned 144,313,193 (or 34.6%) of our outstanding common units. In addition, at March
31, 2006, EPCO and its affiliates owned 86.6% of Enterprise GP Holdings, including 100% of EPE
Holdings.
The principal business activity of Enterprise Products GP is to act as our managing partner.
The executive officers and certain of the directors of Enterprise Products GP and Enterprise GP
Holdings are employees of EPCO. Enterprise Products GP received $22.6 million and $16.6 million of
cash distributions from us in connection with its general partner interest during the three months
ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The foregoing distributions for the three months
ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, include $19.1 million and $13.6 million of incentive distributions,
respectively.
We and Enterprise Products GP are both separate legal entities apart from EPCO and its other
affiliates, with assets and liabilities that are separate from those of EPCO and its other
affiliates. EPCO depends on the cash distributions it receives from us, Enterprise GP Holdings and
other investments to fund its other operations and to meet its debt obligations. EPCO and its
affiliates received $73.1 million and $52.1 million in cash distributions from us during the three
months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, in connection with its limited and general
partnership interests in us.
The ownership interests in us that are owned or controlled by EPCO and its affiliates, other
than Enterprise GP Holdings, Dan Duncan LLC and certain trusts affiliated with Dan L. Duncan, are
pledged as security under the credit facility of an EPCO affiliate. EPCOs credit facility
contains customary and other
24
events of default relating to EPCO and certain affiliates, including Enterprise GP Holdings, us and
TEPPCO.
We have entered into an agreement with an affiliate of EPCO to provide trucking services to us
for the transportation of NGLs and other products. In addition, we have purchased from and sold
certain NGL products to another affiliate of EPCO at market-related prices in the normal course of
business. We also lease office space in various buildings from affiliates of EPCO related to our
corporate headquarters in Houston, Texas. The rental rates in these lease agreements approximate
market rates.
Relationship with TEPPCO. We received $5.5 million from TEPPCO during the three
months ended March 31, 2006 from the sale of hydrocarbon products. During the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005, we paid TEPPCO $4.4 million and $1.5 million, respectively, for NGL
pipeline transportation and storage services.
In January 2006, we announced our intent to purchase (i) the Pioneer natural gas processing
plant located in Opal, Wyoming and (ii) certain natural gas processing rights related to the Jonah
and Pinedale fields in the Greater Green River Basin in Wyoming from TEPPCO. We completed this
acquisition in March 2006 at a cost of $38.1 million. This transaction was reviewed and approved
by the Audit and Conflicts Committee of the board of directors of our general partner and the
general partner of TEPPCO, and a fairness opinion was rendered by an independent third-party.
TEPPCO will have no continued involvement in the contracts or in the operations of the Pioneer
facility. In addition, the unaudited pro forma financial impact of this transaction is not
significant.
In February 2006, we and TEPPCO entered into a letter of intent related to the formation of a
joint venture to expand TEPPCOs Jonah Gas Gathering System (the Jonah system) located in the
Green River Basin in southwestern Wyoming. The proposed expansion of the Jonah system would
increase the natural gas gathering and transportation capacity of the Jonah system from 1.5 Bcf/d
to 2.0 Bcf/d. The letter of intent stipulates that we will be responsible for all
construction-related activities related to the expansion of the Jonah system, including advancing
of all funds necessary to plan, engineer and construct the project. We estimate that total funds
needed for this project will approximate $200 million and that the expansion assets will be placed
in service in late 2006. The amounts we advance to complete the expansion of the Jonah system will
constitute a subscription for an equity interest in the proposed joint venture. TEPPCO has the
option to return to us up to 100% of the amounts we advance (i.e., the subscription amounts). If
TEPPCO returns any portion of the subscription to us, the relative interests of us and TEPPCO in
the new joint venture would be adjusted accordingly. The proposed joint venture arrangement will
terminate without liability to either party if TEPPCO returns 100% of the advances we make in
connection with the expansion project, including carrying costs and expenses. Our expenditures
associated with this project were $55.3 million during the first quarter of 2006, of which $53.5
million has been paid. Other assets on our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at March
31, 2006 include the $55.3 million of expenditures related to this project.
Administrative Services Agreement. We have no employees. All of our management,
administrative and operating functions are performed by employees of EPCO pursuant to an
administrative services agreement (ASA). We and our general partner, Enterprise GP Holdings and
its general partner, and TEPPCO and its general partner are parties to the ASA. We reimburse EPCO
for the costs of its employees who perform operating functions for us and for costs related to its
other management and administrative employees.
Relationships with unconsolidated affiliates
Our significant related party transactions with unconsolidated affiliates consist of the sale
of natural gas to Evangeline and the purchase of NGL storage, transportation and fractionation
services from Promix. In addition, we sell natural gas to Promix and process natural gas at VESCO.
25
14. Earnings per Unit
Basic earnings per unit is computed by dividing net income or loss allocated to limited
partner interests by the weighted-average number of distribution-bearing units (excluding
restricted units) outstanding during a period. Diluted earnings per unit is computed by dividing
net income or loss allocated to limited partner interests by the sum of (i) the weighted-average
number of distribution-bearing units outstanding during a period (as used in determining basic
earnings per unit); (ii) the weighted-average number of time-vested and performance-based
restricted common units outstanding during a period; and (iii) the number of incremental common
units resulting from the assumed exercise of dilutive unit options outstanding during a period (the
incremental option units).
In a period of net operating losses, the restricted units and incremental option units are
excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per unit due to their antidilutive effect. The
dilutive incremental option units are calculated in accordance with the treasury stock method,
which assumes that proceeds from the exercise of all in-the-money options at the end of each period
are used to repurchase common units at an average market value during the period. The amount of
common units remaining after the proceeds are exhausted represents the potentially dilutive effect
of the securities.
The amount of net income or loss allocated to limited partner interests is net of our general
partners share of such earnings. The following table shows the allocation of net income to our
general partner for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
133,777 |
|
|
$ |
109,256 |
|
Less incentive earnings allocations to Enterprise Products GP |
|
|
(19,115 |
) |
|
|
(13,620 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income available after incentive earnings allocation |
|
|
114,662 |
|
|
|
95,636 |
|
Multiplied by Enterprise Products GP ownership interest |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
2.0 |
% |
|
|
|
Standard earnings allocation to Enterprise Products GP |
|
$ |
2,293 |
|
|
$ |
1,913 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incentive earnings allocation to Enterprise Products GP |
|
$ |
19,115 |
|
|
$ |
13,620 |
|
Standard earnings allocation to Enterprise Products GP |
|
|
2,293 |
|
|
|
1,913 |
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Products GP interest in net income |
|
$ |
21,408 |
|
|
$ |
15,533 |
|
|
|
|
26
The following table presents our calculation of basic and diluted earnings per unit for
the periods shown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Income before change in accounting principle
and Enterprise Products GP interest |
|
$ |
132,302 |
|
|
$ |
109,256 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
133,777 |
|
|
|
109,256 |
|
Enterprise Products GP interest in net income |
|
|
(21,408 |
) |
|
|
(15,533 |
) |
|
|
|
Net income available to limited partners |
|
$ |
112,369 |
|
|
$ |
93,723 |
|
|
|
|
BASIC EARNINGS PER UNIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before change in accounting principle
and Enterprise Products GP interest |
|
$ |
132,302 |
|
|
$ |
109,256 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Products GP interest in net income |
|
|
(21,408 |
) |
|
|
(15,533 |
) |
|
|
|
Limited partners interest in net income |
|
$ |
112,369 |
|
|
$ |
93,723 |
|
|
|
|
Denominator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units |
|
|
395,293 |
|
|
|
372,956 |
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before change in accounting principle
and Enterprise Products GP interest |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Products GP interest in net income |
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
Limited partners interest in net income |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
DILUTED EARNINGS PER UNIT |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Numerator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before change in accounting principle
and Enterprise Products GP interest |
|
$ |
132,302 |
|
|
$ |
109,256 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Products GP interest in net income |
|
|
(21,408 |
) |
|
|
(15,533 |
) |
|
|
|
Limited partners interest in net income |
|
$ |
112,369 |
|
|
$ |
93,723 |
|
|
|
|
Denominator |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common units |
|
|
395,293 |
|
|
|
372,956 |
|
Time-vested restricted units |
|
|
755 |
|
|
|
496 |
|
Performance-based restricted units |
|
|
27 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Incremental option units |
|
|
248 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
396,323 |
|
|
|
374,206 |
|
|
|
|
Diluted earnings per unit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before change in accounting principle
and Enterprise Products GP interest |
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
* |
|
|
|
|
|
Enterprise Products GP interest in net income |
|
|
(0.05 |
) |
|
|
(0.04 |
) |
|
|
|
Limited partners interest in net income |
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.25 |
|
|
|
|
27
15. Commitments and Contingencies
Litigation
On occasion, we are named as a defendant in litigation relating to our normal business
activities, including regulatory and environmental matters. Although we insure against various
business risks to the extent we believe it is prudent, there is no assurance that the nature and
amount of such insurance will be adequate, in every case, to indemnify us against liabilities
arising from future legal proceedings as a result of our ordinary business activities. We are not
aware of any significant litigation, pending or threatened, that may have a significant adverse
effect on our financial position, cash flows or results of operations.
A number of lawsuits have been filed by municipalities and other water suppliers against
various manufacturers of reformulated gasoline containing methyl tertiary butyl ether (MTBE). In
general, such suits have not named manufacturers of MTBE as defendants, and there have been no such
lawsuits filed against our subsidiary that owns an octane-additive production facility. It is
possible, however, that MTBE manufacturers such as our subsidiary could ultimately be added as
defendants in such lawsuits or in new lawsuits.
We acquired the remaining ownership interests in our octane-additive production facility from
affiliates of Devon Energy Corporation (Devon, which sold us its 33.3% interest in 2003) and
Sunoco, Inc. (Sun, which sold us a 33.3% interest in 2004). Devon and Sun have indemnified us
for any liability (including liabilities described above) that is in respect of periods prior to
the date we purchased such interests. There are no dollar limits or deductibles associated with
the indemnities we received from Sun and Devon with respect to potential claims linked to the
period of time they held ownership interests in our octane-additive production facility.
Operating leases
We lease certain property, plant and equipment under noncancelable and cancelable operating
leases. Our significant lease agreements involve (i) the lease of underground caverns for the
storage of natural gas and NGLs, (ii) leased office space with an affiliate of EPCO, and (iii) land
held pursuant to right-of-way agreements. In general, our material lease agreements have original
terms that range from 14 to 20 years and include renewal options that could extend the agreements
for up to an additional 20 years. Lease expense is charged to operating costs and expenses on a
straight line basis over the period of expected economic benefit. Contingent rental payments are
expensed as incurred. Lease and rental expense included in operating income was $9.7 million and
$9.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
There have been no material changes in our operating lease commitments since December 31,
2005, except for the renewal of our Wilson natural gas storage facility lease. During the first
quarter of 2006, we exercised our right to renew the Wilson lease for an additional 20-year period.
Our rental payments under the renewal agreement are at a fixed rate. Under the renewal agreement,
we have the option to purchase the Wilson natural gas storage facility at either December 31, 2024
for $61 million or January 25, 2028 for $55 million. In addition, the lessor, at its election, may
cause us to purchase the facility for $65 million at the end of any calendar quarter beginning on
March 31, 2008 and extending through December 31, 2023. After adjusting for the renewal, the
incremental future minimum lease payments associated with our lease of the Wilson natural gas
storage facility are as follows: $4.1 million, 2008; $5.5 million, 2009; $5.5 million, 2010; and
$94.9 million thereafter.
Performance guaranty
In December 2004, a subsidiary of the Operating Partnership entered into the Independence Hub
Agreement (the Agreement) with six oil and natural gas producers. The Agreement, as amended,
obligates the subsidiary (i) to construct an offshore platform production facility to process 1
Bcf/d of natural gas and condensate and (ii) to process certain natural gas and condensate
production of the six producers following construction of the platform facility.
28
In conjunction with the Agreement, our Operating Partnership guaranteed the performance of its
subsidiary under the Agreement up to $426 million. In December 2004, 20% of this guaranteed amount
was assumed by Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. (formerly known as Cal Dive International, Inc.),
our joint venture partner in the Independence Hub project. The remaining $341 million represents
our share of the anticipated cost of the platform facility. This amount represents the cap on our
Operating Partnerships potential obligation to the six producers for the cost of constructing the
platform under the remote scenario where the six producers take over the construction of the
platform facility. This performance guarantee continues until the earlier to occur of (i) all of
the guaranteed obligations of the subsidiary shall have been terminated, paid or otherwise
discharged in full, (ii) upon mutual written consent of our Operating Partnership and the producers
or (iii) mechanical completion of the production facility. We currently expect that mechanical
completion of the platform will occur in January 2007; therefore, we anticipate that the
performance guaranty will exist until at least this future period.
In accordance with FIN 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure Requirements for Guarantees,
Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness of Others, we recorded the fair value of the
performance guaranty using an expected present value approach. Given the remote probability that
our Operating Partnership would be required to perform under this guaranty, we have estimated the
fair value of the performance guaranty at approximately $1.2 million, which is a component of other
current liabilities on our Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2006.
16. Significant Risks and Uncertainties Hurricanes
The following is a discussion of the general status of insurance claims related to significant
storm events that affected our assets in 2004 and 2005. To the extent we include any estimate
regarding the dollar value of damages, please be aware that a change in our estimates may occur as
additional information becomes available to us.
Hurricane Ivan insurance claims. Our final purchase price allocation for the
GulfTerra Merger included a $26.2 million receivable for insurance claims related to expenditures
to repair property damage to certain GulfTerra assets caused by Hurricane Ivan, which struck the
U.S. Gulf Coast in September 2004 prior to the GulfTerra Merger. During the first quarter of 2006,
we received cash reimbursements from insurance carriers totaling $24.1 million related to these
property damage claims, and we expect to recover the remaining $2.1 million by mid-2006. If the
final recovery of funds is different than the amount previously expended, we will recognize an
income impact at that time.
In addition, we have submitted business interruption insurance claims for our estimated losses
caused by Hurricane Ivan. During the first quarter of 2006, we received claim proceeds of $10.2
million, , and in April 2006 we received an additional $2 million. To the extent we receive cash
proceeds from business interruption claims, they are recorded as a gain in our statements of
consolidated operations and comprehensive income in the period of receipt.
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita insurance claims. Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, both
significant storms, affected certain of our Gulf Coast assets in August and September of 2005,
respectively. Inspection and evaluation of property damage to our facilities is a continuing
effort. To the extent that insurance proceeds from property damage claims do not cover our
expenditures (in excess of the $5 million of insurance deductibles we expensed during the third
quarter of 2005), such shortfall will be charged to earnings when realized. We have recorded $37.2
million of estimated recoveries from property damage claims based on amounts expended through March
31, 2006.
In addition, we expect to file business interruption claims for losses related to these
hurricanes. To the extent we receive cash proceeds from such business interruption claims, they
will be recorded as a gain in our statements of consolidated operations and comprehensive income in
the period of receipt.
29
17. Supplemental Cash Flow Information
We prepare our statements of consolidated cash flows using the indirect method. The indirect
method derives net cash flows from operating activities by adjusting net income to remove (i) the
effects of all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments, such as changes during the
period in inventory, deferred income and the like, (ii) the effects of all accruals of expected
future operating cash receipts and cash payments, such as changes during the period in receivables
and payables, and (iii) the effects of all items classified as investing or financing cash flows,
such as gains or losses on sale of assets or gains or losses from the extinguishment of debt.
The net effect of changes in operating assets and liabilities is as follows for the periods
indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Decrease (increase) in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts and notes receivable |
|
$ |
355,049 |
|
|
$ |
150,833 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
84,191 |
|
|
|
(120,178 |
) |
Prepaid and other current assets |
|
|
12,482 |
|
|
|
(16,572 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
7,866 |
|
|
|
10,226 |
|
Increase (decrease) in: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
(85,314 |
) |
|
|
(172,437 |
) |
Accrued gas payable |
|
|
(174,960 |
) |
|
|
116,962 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
|
44,029 |
|
|
|
(19,438 |
) |
Accrued interest |
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
(3,618 |
) |
Other current liabilities |
|
|
2,615 |
|
|
|
1,159 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
1,086 |
|
|
|
(5,857 |
) |
|
|
|
Net effect of changes in operating accounts |
|
$ |
247,084 |
|
|
$ |
(58,920 |
) |
|
|
|
Third parties may be obligated to reimburse us for all or a portion of project
expenditures on certain of our capital projects. The majority of such arrangements are associated
with projects related to pipeline construction and production well tie-ins. We received $12.2
million and $8.9 million as contributions in aid of our construction costs during the three months
ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
18. Condensed Financial Information of Operating Partnership
The Operating Partnership conducts substantially all of our business. Currently, we have no
independent operations and no material assets outside those of our Operating Partnership.
At March 31, 2006, we act as guarantor of the debt obligations of our Operating Partnership,
with the exception of the Dixie revolving credit facility and senior subordinated notes assumed
from GulfTerra. If the Operating Partnership were to default on any debt we guarantee, we would be
responsible for full repayment of that obligation. For additional information regarding our
consolidated debt obligations, see Note 10.
The reconciling items between our consolidated financial statements and those of our Operating
Partnership are insignificant.
30
The following table shows condensed consolidated balance sheet data for the Operating
Partnership at the dates indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
1,501,713 |
|
|
$ |
1,960,015 |
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
|
8,825,047 |
|
|
|
8,689,024 |
|
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates, net |
|
|
463,532 |
|
|
|
471,921 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
|
930,069 |
|
|
|
913,626 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
494,033 |
|
|
|
494,033 |
|
Deferred tax asset |
|
|
4,821 |
|
|
|
3,606 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
92,281 |
|
|
|
39,014 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
12,311,496 |
|
|
$ |
12,571,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
$ |
1,648,242 |
|
|
$ |
1,894,227 |
|
Long-term debt |
|
|
4,396,315 |
|
|
|
4,833,781 |
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
|
113,093 |
|
|
|
84,486 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
118,187 |
|
|
|
106,159 |
|
Partners equity |
|
|
6,035,659 |
|
|
|
5,652,586 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
12,311,496 |
|
|
$ |
12,571,239 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Operating Partnership debt obligations guaranteed by us |
|
$ |
4,434,000 |
|
|
$ |
4,844,000 |
|
|
|
|
The following table shows condensed consolidated statements of operations data for the
Operating Partnership for the periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
3,250,074 |
|
|
$ |
2,555,522 |
|
Costs and expenses |
|
|
3,058,646 |
|
|
|
2,397,646 |
|
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
4,029 |
|
|
|
8,279 |
|
|
|
|
Operating income |
|
|
195,457 |
|
|
|
166,155 |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
|
(56,512 |
) |
|
|
(52,475 |
) |
|
|
|
Income before provision for income taxes, minority
interest and change in accounting principle |
|
|
138,945 |
|
|
|
113,680 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
|
|
(2,892 |
) |
|
|
(1,769 |
) |
|
|
|
Income before minority interest and change in
accounting principle |
|
|
136,053 |
|
|
|
111,911 |
|
Minority interest |
|
|
(2,199 |
) |
|
|
(1,941 |
) |
|
|
|
Income before change in accounting principle |
|
|
133,854 |
|
|
|
109,970 |
|
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
|
1,475 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
135,329 |
|
|
$ |
109,970 |
|
|
|
|
31
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
For the three months ended March 31, 2006 and 2005.
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. is a publicly traded Delaware limited partnership, the
common units of which are listed on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the ticker symbol
EPD. Unless the context requires otherwise, references to we, us, our, or Enterprise
Products Partners are intended to mean the consolidated business and operations of Enterprise
Products Partners L.P. and its subsidiaries.
We are a North American midstream energy company that provides a wide range of services to
producers and consumers of natural gas, natural gas liquids (NGLs), and crude oil. In addition,
we are an industry leader in the development of pipeline and other midstream assets in the
continental United States and Gulf of Mexico. We conduct substantially all of our business through
our wholly owned subsidiary, Enterprise Products Operating L.P. (our Operating Partnership).
We are owned 98% by our limited partners and 2% by Enterprise Products GP, LLC (our general
partner, referred to as Enterprise Products GP). Enterprise Products GP is owned 100% by
Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. (Enterprise GP Holdings), a publicly traded affiliate, the common
units of which are listed on the NYSE under the ticker symbol EPE. We, Enterprise Products GP
and Enterprise GP Holdings are affiliates and under common control of Dan L. Duncan, the Chairman
and controlling shareholder of EPCO, Inc. (EPCO).
This quarterly report contains various forward-looking statements and information based on our
beliefs and those of Enterprise Products GP, our general partner, as well as assumptions made by us
and information currently available to us. Please read the section titled Cautionary Statement
Regarding Forward-Looking Information included within this Item 2.
As generally used in the energy industry and in this document, the identified terms have the
following meanings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/ d
|
|
= per day |
|
|
BBtus
|
|
= billion British thermal units |
|
|
Bcf
|
|
= billion cubic feet |
|
|
MBPD
|
|
= thousand barrels per day |
|
|
Mdth
|
|
= thousand dekatherms |
|
|
MMBbls
|
|
= million barrels |
|
|
MMBtus
|
|
= million British thermal units |
|
|
MMcf
|
|
= million cubic feet |
|
|
Mcf
|
|
= thousand cubic feet |
|
|
TBtu
|
|
= trillion British thermal units |
In addition, references to TEPPCO mean TEPPCO Partners, L.P., which is a related party
affiliate to us. References to TEPPCO GP refer to the general partner of TEPPCO, which is wholly
owned by a private company subsidiary of EPCO.
The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited
consolidated financial statements and notes included under Item 1 of this quarterly report on Form
10-Q and with our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2005 (Commission File
No. 1-14323).
32
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
In general, our outlook for 2006 remains the same as that discussed in our annual report on
Form 10-K for 2005. The following summarizes our significant developments during the first four
months of 2006.
|
§ |
|
In March 2006, we sold 18,400,000 common units (including the over-allotment amount
of 2,400,000 common units), which generated net proceeds of approximately $430
million. |
|
|
§ |
|
In March 2006, we announced plans to expand our petrochemical assets located in
southeast Texas at a cost of $205 million. In addition, we purchased the Pioneer
natural gas processing plant and certain natural gas processing rights from TEPPCO for
$38.1 million in March 2006. |
|
|
§ |
|
In April 2006, we announced plans to expand our Houston Ship Channel NGL import and
export facility and related pipeline and other assets to accommodate expected
increases in volumes. This expansion project is expected to cost $40 million and be
completed in the second quarter of 2007. For additional information regarding our
growth capital spending, please read Capital Spending included within this Item 2. |
CAPITAL SPENDING
We are committed to the long-term growth and viability of Enterprise Products Partners. Part
of our business strategy involves expansion through business combinations, growth capital projects
and investments in joint ventures. Leveraging off of our existing assets, we have developed a
significant portfolio of growth capital projects. Supported by long-term production dedications
and fee-based contracts, we believe that we are positioned to continue to grow our system of assets
through the construction of new facilities and to capitalize on expected future production
increases from such areas as the Piceance Basin of western Colorado, the Greater Green River Basin
in Wyoming, and the deepwater Gulf of Mexico.
Management continues to analyze potential acquisitions, joint ventures and similar
transactions with businesses that operate in complementary markets or geographic regions. In
recent years, major oil and gas companies have sold non-strategic assets in the midstream energy
sector in which we operate. We forecast that this trend will continue, and expect independent oil
and natural gas companies to consider similar divestitures.
We estimate that our consolidated capital spending for the remainder of 2006 (i.e., the
second, third and fourth quarters) will approximate $1.5 billion, which includes estimated
expenditures of approximately $1.4 billion for growth capital projects and acquisitions and the
remainder for sustaining capital expenditures.
Our forecast of consolidated capital expenditures is based on our strategic operating and
growth plans, which are dependent upon our ability to generate the required funds from either
operating cash flows or from other means. Our capital expenditures forecast may change due to
factors beyond our control, such as weather related issues, changes in supplier prices or adverse
economic conditions. Furthermore, our forecast may change as a result of decisions made by
management at a later date, which may include acquisitions or decisions to take on additional
partners.
Our success in raising capital, including the formation of joint ventures to share costs and
risks, continues to be the principal factor that determines how much we can spend. We believe our
access to capital resources is sufficient to meet the demands of our current and future operating
growth needs, and although we currently intend to make the forecasted expenditures discussed above,
we may adjust the timing and amounts of projected expenditures in response to changes in capital
markets.
33
The following table summarizes our capital spending by activity for the periods indicated
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Capital spending for business combinations and asset purchases: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pioneer natural gas processing plant and associated processing rights
purchased from TEPPCO |
|
$ |
38,100 |
|
|
|
|
|
Indirect interests in the Indian Springs natural gas gathering and
processing assets |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
74,855 |
|
Additional ownership interests in Dixie Pipeline Company (Dixie) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,049 |
|
Other business combinations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,574 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
38,100 |
|
|
|
150,478 |
|
|
|
|
Capital spending for property, plant and equipment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Growth capital projects |
|
|
236,508 |
|
|
|
150,738 |
|
Sustaining capital projects |
|
|
30,010 |
|
|
|
15,550 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
266,518 |
|
|
|
166,288 |
|
|
|
|
Capital spending attributable to unconsolidated affiliates: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments in and advances to unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
402 |
|
|
|
88,634 |
|
|
|
|
Total capital spending |
|
$ |
305,020 |
|
|
$ |
405,400 |
|
|
|
|
Our capital spending for growth capital projects (as presented in the preceding table)
are net of amounts we received from third parties as contributions in aid of our construction
costs. Such contributions were $12.2 million and $8.9 million for the three months ended March
31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. On certain of our capital projects, third parties are obligated
to reimburse us for all or a portion of project expenditures. The majority of such arrangements
are associated with projects related to pipeline construction and production well tie-ins.
At March 31, 2006, we had $245.4 million in outstanding purchase commitments, which primarily
relate to growth capital projects in the Rocky Mountains and offshore Gulf of Mexico that are
expected to be placed in service in 2006 and 2007.
Significant Recently Announced Growth Capital Projects
The following summarizes our significant growth capital projects initiated during the first
four months of 2006.
Piceance Basin Gas Processing Project. In January 2006, we announced the execution of
a minimum 15-year natural gas processing agreement with an affiliate of the EnCana Corporation
(EnCana). Under that agreement, we will have the right to process up to 1.3 Bcf/d of EnCanas
natural gas production from the Piceance Basin area of western Colorado. To accommodate this
production, we have begun construction of the Meeker natural gas processing facility in Rio Blanco
County, Colorado. In addition, we will construct a 50-mile NGL pipeline that will connect our
Meeker facility with our Mid-America Pipeline System. The Meeker natural gas processing plant,
which will provide us with 750 MMcf/d of natural gas processing capacity and the ability to recover
up to 35 MBPD of NGLs, is expected to be placed in service in mid-2007 at a cost of $285 million.
We are currently working to secure production dedications from additional producers, which may lead
to an expansion of the Meeker facility.
Wyoming Gas Processing Projects. In January 2006, we announced our intent to purchase
from an affiliate of TEPPCO the Pioneer natural gas processing plant located in Opal, Wyoming and
the rights of TEPPCO and its affiliates to process natural gas originating from the Jonah and
Pinedale fields in the Greater Green River Basin in Wyoming. We completed this acquisition in
March 2006 at a cost of $38.1 million and commenced construction to increase the processing
capacity of the Pioneer plant from 275 MMcf/d to 550 MMcf/d at an additional expected cost of $21
million. We expect this expansion to be competed in mid-2006. This transaction was reviewed and
approved by the Audit and Conflicts Committee of the board of directors of our general partner and
the general partner of TEPPCO, and a fairness opinion
34
was rendered by an independent third-party. TEPPCO will have no continued involvement in the
contracts or in the operations of the Pioneer facility.
In addition, to handle future production growth in the region, we will construct a new natural
gas processing plant with a capacity of 650 MMcf/d adjacent to the Pioneer plant. We expect our
new natural gas processing plant to be placed in service by mid-2007 at an expected cost of $230
million.
Jonah Expansion. In February 2006, we and TEPPCO, entered into a letter of intent
related to the formation of a joint venture to expand TEPPCOs Jonah Gas Gathering System (the
Jonah system) located in the Green River Basin in southwestern Wyoming. The proposed expansion of
the Jonah system would increase the natural gas gathering and transportation capacity of the Jonah
system from 1.5 Bcf/d to 2.0 Bcf/d.
The letter of intent stipulates that we will be responsible for all activities related to the
construction of the expansion of the Jonah system, including the advance of all expenditures
necessary to plan, engineer and construct the expansion project. We estimate that total funds
needed for this project will approximate $200 million and that the expansion assets will be placed
in service in late 2006.
The amounts we advance to complete the expansion of the Jonah system will constitute a
subscription for an equity interest in the proposed joint venture. TEPPCO has the option to return
to us up to 100% of the amounts we advance (i.e., the subscription amounts). If TEPPCO returns any
portion of the subscription to us, the relative interests of us and TEPPCO in the new joint venture
would be adjusted accordingly. The proposed joint venture arrangement will terminate without
liability to either party if TEPPCO returns 100% of the advances we make in connection with the
expansion project, including carrying costs and expenses. Our expenditures associated with this
project were $55.3 million during the first quarter of 2006, of which $53.5 million has been paid.
Expansion of Mont Belvieu Petrochemical Assets. In March 2006, we announced an
expansion of petrochemical assets in Mont Belvieu and southeast Texas. This expansion project
includes (i) the construction of a new propylene fractionator at our Mont Belvieu complex, which
will increase our propylene/propane fractionation capacity by approximately 15 MBPD and (ii) the
expansion of two refinery grade propylene gathering pipelines which will add 50 MBPD of gathering
capacity into Mont Belvieu. These projects are expected to be operational by late 2007 and are
expected to cost $205 million.
Expansion of Houston Ship Channel Import and Export Facility. In April 2006, we
announced an expansion of our NGL import and export terminal located on the Houston Ship Channel.
This expansion project will increase offloading capability of our import facility from a maximum
peak operating rate of 240 MBPD to 480 MBPD and the maximum loading rate of our export facility
from 140 MBPD to 160 MBPD. As part of this expansion project, we will increase the transportation
and processing capacities of certain of our assets that serve the terminal in order to accommodate
the expected increase in import volumes. This expansion project is expected to cost $40 million
and be completed in the second quarter of 2007.
Pipeline Integrity Costs
Our NGL, petrochemical and natural gas pipelines are subject to pipeline safety programs
administered by the U.S. Department of Transportation, through its Office of Pipeline Safety.
During the first quarter of 2006, we spent approximately $18.6 million to comply with these
programs, of which $5.9 million was recorded as an operating expense and the remaining $12.7
million was capitalized. We spent approximately $5.4 million to comply with these programs during
the first quarter of 2005, of which $4.3 million was recorded as an operating expense and the
remaining $1.1 million was capitalized.
We expect our net cash outlay for pipeline integrity program expenditures to approximate $50.9
million for the remainder 2006. Our forecast is net of certain costs we expect to recover from El
Paso in connection with an indemnification agreement. We recovered $13.8 million from El Paso
related to our 2005 expenditures in May 2006 and expect to recover $2.1 million related to our
first quarter 2006
35
expenditures, which leaves a remainder of $34.3 million reimbursable by El Paso for 2006 and
2007 pipeline integrity costs.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
We have four reportable business segments: NGL Pipelines & Services, Onshore Natural Gas
Pipelines & Services, Offshore Pipelines & Services and Petrochemical Services. Our business
segments are generally organized and managed according to the type of services rendered (or
technology employed) and products produced and/or sold.
We evaluate segment performance based on the non-generally accepted accounting principle
(non-GAAP) financial measure of gross operating margin. Gross operating margin (either in total
or by individual segment) is an important performance measure of the core profitability of our
operations. This measure forms the basis of our internal financial reporting and is used by senior
management in deciding how to allocate capital resources among business segments. We believe that
investors benefit from having access to the same financial measures that our management uses in
evaluating segment results. The financial measure calculated using accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) most directly comparable to total segment gross
operating margin is operating income. Our non-GAAP financial measure of total segment gross
operating margin should not be considered as an alternative to GAAP operating income.
We define total (or consolidated) segment gross operating margin as operating income before:
(i) depreciation, amortization and accretion expense; (ii) operating lease expenses for which we do
not have the payment obligation; (iii) gains and losses on the sale of assets; and (iv) general and
administrative expenses. Gross operating margin is exclusive of other income and expense
transactions, provision for income taxes, minority interest, extraordinary charges and the
cumulative effect of changes in accounting principles. Gross operating margin by segment is
calculated by subtracting segment operating costs and expenses (net of the adjustments noted above)
from segment revenues, with both segment totals before the elimination of intersegment and
intrasegment transactions.
Historically, we have included equity earnings from unconsolidated affiliates in our
measurement of segment gross operating margin and operating income. Our equity investments with
industry partners are a vital component of our business strategy. They are a means by which we
conduct our operations to align our interests with those of our customers, which may be suppliers
of raw materials or consumers of finished products. This method of operation also enables us to
achieve favorable economies of scale relative to the level of investment and business risk assumed
versus what we could accomplish on a stand-alone basis. Many of these businesses perform
supporting or complementary roles to our other business operations.
For additional information regarding our business segments, please read Note 12 of the Notes
to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1 of this quarterly
report.
36
Selected Price and Volumetric Data
The following table presents selected average quarterly industry index prices for natural gas,
crude oil and selected NGL and petrochemical products since the beginning of 2005:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Polymer |
|
Refinery |
|
|
Natural |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Normal |
|
|
|
|
|
Natural |
|
Grade |
|
Grade |
|
|
Gas, |
|
Crude Oil, |
|
Ethane, |
|
Propane, |
|
Butane, |
|
Isobutane, |
|
Gasoline, |
|
Propylene, |
|
Propylene, |
|
|
$/MMBtu |
|
$/barrel |
|
$/gallon |
|
$/gallon |
|
$/gallon |
|
$/gallon |
|
$/gallon |
|
$/pound |
|
$/pound |
|
|
(1) |
|
(2) |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
(1) |
|
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Quarter |
|
$ |
6.27 |
|
|
$ |
49.68 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
0.79 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.39 |
|
2nd Quarter |
|
$ |
6.74 |
|
|
$ |
53.09 |
|
|
$ |
0.52 |
|
|
$ |
0.82 |
|
|
$ |
0.98 |
|
|
$ |
1.01 |
|
|
$ |
1.16 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.30 |
|
3rd Quarter |
|
$ |
8.53 |
|
|
$ |
63.08 |
|
|
$ |
0.69 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
1.14 |
|
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
$ |
0.33 |
|
4th Quarter |
|
$ |
13.00 |
|
|
$ |
60.03 |
|
|
$ |
0.76 |
|
|
$ |
1.06 |
|
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.34 |
|
|
$ |
1.36 |
|
|
$ |
0.50 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
Average for Year |
|
$ |
8.64 |
|
|
$ |
56.47 |
|
|
$ |
0.62 |
|
|
$ |
0.91 |
|
|
$ |
1.09 |
|
|
$ |
1.15 |
|
|
$ |
1.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.42 |
|
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Quarter |
|
$ |
9.01 |
|
|
$ |
63.35 |
|
|
$ |
0.57 |
|
|
$ |
0.94 |
|
|
$ |
1.20 |
|
|
$ |
1.27 |
|
|
$ |
1.38 |
|
|
$ |
0.45 |
|
|
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Natural gas, NGL, polymer grade propylene and refinery grade propylene prices represent an average of various commercial index prices including Oil Price
Information Service (OPIS) and Chemical Market Associates, Inc. (CMAI). The natural gas price is representative of Henry-Hub I-FERC. NGL prices are
representative of Mont Belvieu Non-TET pricing. Refinery grade propylene represents an average of CMAI spot prices. Polymer-grade propylene represents average
CMAI contract pricing. |
|
(2) |
|
Crude oil price is representative of an index price for West Texas Intermediate. |
The following table presents our significant average throughput, production and
processing volumetric data. These statistics are reported on a net basis, taking into account our
ownership interests, and reflect the periods in which we owned an interest in such operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
NGL Pipelines & Services, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGL transportation volumes (MBPD) |
|
|
1,421 |
|
|
|
1,410 |
|
NGL fractionation volumes (MBPD) |
|
|
255 |
|
|
|
338 |
|
Equity NGL production (MBPD)(1) |
|
|
58 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Fee-based natural gas processing (MMcf/d) |
|
|
1,807 |
|
|
|
2,018 |
|
Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas transportation volumes (BBtus/d) |
|
|
6,052 |
|
|
|
5,746 |
|
Offshore Pipelines & Services, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas transportation volumes (BBtus/d) |
|
|
1,476 |
|
|
|
1,851 |
|
Crude oil transportation volumes (MBPD) |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
126 |
|
Platform gas processing (Mcf/d) |
|
|
157 |
|
|
|
316 |
|
Platform oil processing (MBPD) |
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Petrochemical Services, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Butane isomerization volumes (MBPD) |
|
|
84 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
Propylene fractionation volumes (MBPD) |
|
|
52 |
|
|
|
54 |
|
Octane additive production volumes (MBPD) |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Petrochemical transportation volumes (MBPD) |
|
|
63 |
|
|
|
74 |
|
Total, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGL, crude oil and petrochemical transportation volumes (MBPD) |
|
|
1,597 |
|
|
|
1,610 |
|
Natural gas transportation volumes (BBtus/d) |
|
|
7,528 |
|
|
|
7,597 |
|
Equivalent transportation volumes (MBPD)(2) |
|
|
3,578 |
|
|
|
3,609 |
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Volumes for the first quarter of 2005 have been revised to incorporate refined asset-level definitions of equity NGL production volumes. |
|
(2) |
|
Reflects equivalent energy volumes where 3.8 MMBtus of natural gas are equivalent to one barrel of NGLs. |
37
Comparison of Results of Operations
The following table summarizes the key components of our results of operations for the periods
indicated (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Revenues |
|
$ |
3,250,074 |
|
|
$ |
2,555,522 |
|
Operating costs and expenses |
|
|
3,046,863 |
|
|
|
2,383,644 |
|
General and administrative costs |
|
|
13,740 |
|
|
|
14,693 |
|
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
4,029 |
|
|
|
8,279 |
|
Operating income |
|
|
193,500 |
|
|
|
165,464 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
58,077 |
|
|
|
53,413 |
|
Net income |
|
|
133,777 |
|
|
|
109,256 |
|
Revenues from the marketing of NGL products within the NGL Pipelines & Services business
segment accounted for 67% of total consolidated revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2006
and 2005. Revenues from the marketing of petrochemical products within the Petrochemical Services
segment accounted for 11% and 13% of total consolidated revenues for the three months ended March
31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Revenues from the transportation, sale and storage of natural gas
using onshore assets accounted for 15% and 12% of total consolidated revenues for the three months
ended March 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively.
Our gross operating margin by segment and in total is as follows for the periods indicated
(dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
|
2006 |
|
|
2005 |
|
|
|
|
Gross operating margin by segment: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NGL Pipelines & Services |
|
$ |
170,950 |
|
|
$ |
153,304 |
|
Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services |
|
|
96,803 |
|
|
|
79,358 |
|
Offshore Pipelines & Services |
|
|
17,252 |
|
|
|
23,224 |
|
Petrochemical Services |
|
|
27,518 |
|
|
|
19,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment gross operating margin |
|
$ |
312,523 |
|
|
$ |
275,214 |
|
|
|
|
For a reconciliation of non-GAAP gross operating margin to GAAP operating income and
further to GAAP income before provision for taxes, minority interest and cumulative effect of
change in accounting principle, please read Other Items included within this Item 2.
Comparison of Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 with Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
Revenues for the first quarter of 2006 increased $694.6 million over those recorded during the
first quarter of 2005. The trend in consolidated revenues can be attributed to (i) a $489.2
million increase in revenues from our NGL and petrochemical marketing activities resulting from an
increase in sales volumes and energy commodity prices in the first quarter of 2006 relative to the
same period in 2005 and (ii) a $151.5 million increase in revenues from the sale of natural gas
attributable to higher sales volumes and prices quarter-to-quarter.
Consolidated operating costs and expenses increased $663.2 million quarter-to-quarter
primarily due to higher energy commodity prices, which resulted in a $574.4 million increase in the
cost of sales of natural gas, NGLs and petrochemical products. General and administrative costs
decreased $1 million quarter-to-quarter.
38
Changes in our revenues and costs and expenses period-to-period are explained in part by
changes in energy commodity prices. The weighted-average indicative market price for NGLs was 94
cents per gallon (CPG) during the first quarter of 2006 versus 80 CPG during the same period in
2005 a quarter-to-quarter increase of 18%. Our determination of the weighted-average indicative
market price for NGLs is based on U.S. Gulf Coast prices for such products at Mont Belvieu, which
is the primary industry hub for domestic NGL production. The market price of natural gas (as
measured at Henry Hub) averaged $9.01 per MMBtu during the first quarter of 2006 versus $6.27 per
MMBtu during the 2005 period. For historical energy commodity pricing information, please see the
table on page 37.
Equity earnings from unconsolidated affiliates decreased $4.3 million quarter-to-quarter
primarily due to (i) the consolidation of our investment in the Dixie Pipeline Company in February
2005, (ii) facility down-time and repair costs at our VESCO plant in the first quarter of 2006
caused by damage inflicted by Hurricane Katrina, and (iii) reduced earnings from Cameron Highway
Oil Pipeline Company (Cameron Highway). Collectively, the aforementioned changes in revenues,
costs and expenses and equity earnings contributed to a $28 million increase in operating income
quarter-to-quarter.
Interest expense increased $4.7 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to an increase in
interest rates and debt outstanding.
As a result of items noted in the previous paragraphs, net income increased $24.5 million to
$133.8 million for the first quarter of 2006 compared to $109.3 million for the first quarter of
2005. Net income for the first quarter of 2006 includes a non-cash benefit of $1.5 million related
to the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle resulting from our adoption of
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) 123(R) on January 1, 2006.. For additional
information regarding this cumulative effect adjustment, please read Note 3 of the Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1 of this quarterly
report.
All of our major onshore and offshore facilities affected by last years hurricanes have
returned to service. We are at varying stages of the insurance claims process with respect to
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Our results of operations for the first quarter of 2006 include $10.2
million from the settlement and collection of business interruption insurance claims from Hurricane
Ivan, which struck the U.S. Gulf Coast in September 2004. We expect to receive additional
insurance recoveries from claims related to Hurricanes Ivan, Katrina and Rita in 2006 and 2007.
For additional information regarding our insurance claims related to these storm events, please
read Results of Operations Significant Risks and Uncertainties Hurricanes included within
this Item 2.
The following information highlights significant quarter-to-quarter variances in gross
operating margin by business segment:
NGL Pipelines & Services. Gross operating margin from this business segment was
$170.9 million for the first quarter of 2006 compared to $153.3 million for the first quarter of
2005. The $17.6 million increase in gross operating margin is primarily due to improved results
from our NGL pipelines and related services. Gross operating margin from our NGL pipelines and
related services increased $18.4 million quarter-to-quarter due to a variety of reasons, including
(i) a $10.1 million increase attributable to higher pipeline throughput, NGL storage and export
volumes and (ii) the addition of $6.4 million of gross operating margin from acquired or
consolidated assets, particularly that generated by Dixie NGL Pipeline.
Gross operating margin from natural gas processing and related NGL marketing activities
increased $1.3 million quarter-to-quarter. Gross operating margin from NGL fractionation decreased
$2.1 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to lower fractionation volumes and higher energy
costs. Our Louisiana NGL fractionators, particularly Norco, suffered a reduction of processing
volumes due to the effects of Hurricane Katrina. Our Norco NGL fractionator returned to normal
operating rates in the second quarter of 2006.
39
Gross operating margin from this business segment for the first quarter of 2006 also includes
$8.3 million of income resulting from business interruption insurance recoveries attributable to
Hurricane Ivan. These recoveries relate to our South Louisiana assets that were affected by this
storm in 2004.
Onshore Natural Gas Pipelines & Services. Gross operating margin for this business
segment was $96.8 million for the first quarter of 2006 versus $79.4 million for the first quarter
of 2005. Onshore natural gas transportation volumes increased to 6.1 TBtu/d during the first
quarter of 2006 from 5.7 TBtu/d during same quarter in 2005. The $17.4 million increase in gross
operating margin quarter-to-quarter is primarily due to (i) a $9.2 million increase from our Texas
Intrastate System, Permian Basin System and Petal natural gas storage facility attributable to an
increase in volumes and (ii) a $6 million increase from our Acadian Gas System and San Juan
Gathering System, both of which benefited from higher natural gas prices during the first quarter
of 2006 relative to the first quarter of 2005. As a measure of operating activity of our San Juan
Gathering System, we completed 109 production well tie-ins during the first quarter of 2006.
Offshore Pipelines & Services. Gross operating margin from this business segment was
$17.3 million for the first quarter of 2006 compared to $23.2 million for the first quarter of
2005. The $5.9 million decrease in gross operating margin quarter-to-quarter is primarily due to
the effects of facility down-time and lower processing and transportation volumes caused by
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, the impacts of which were partially offset by $1.9 million of
Hurricane Ivan business interruption insurance recoveries recorded in the first quarter of 2006.
Also, gross operating margin from this business segment includes $1.2 million from our recently
completed Constitution Oil and Natural Gas Pipelines, which were finished ahead of schedule and
placed in service during the first quarter of 2006. Additionally, our Phoenix Gathering System
returned to service in April 2006 and is expected to return to pre-hurricane transportation rates
during the second quarter of 2006. This system was shut-in as a result of damage inflicted by
Hurricane Rita on certain downstream pipelines owned by third parties.
Petrochemical Services. Gross operating margin from this business segment was $27.5
million for the first quarter of 2006 versus $19.3 million for the first quarter of 2005. Gross
operating margin from propylene fractionation increased $5.7 million quarter-to-quarter primarily
due to higher petrochemical marketing sales margins. Gross operating margin from butane
isomerization increased $4.6 million quarter-to-quarter largely due to increased demand for motor
gasoline additives. Gross operating margin from octane enhancement decreased $2.1 million
quarter-to-quarter as a result of facility downtime and costs resulting from a scheduled
maintenance outage during the first quarter of 2006.
Significant Risks and Uncertainties Hurricanes
The following is a discussion of the general status of insurance claims related to significant
storm events that affected our assets in 2004 and 2005. To the extent we include any estimate
regarding the dollar value of damages, please be aware that a change in our estimates may occur as
additional information becomes available to us.
Hurricane Ivan insurance claims. Our final purchase price allocation related to the
merger of GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P. (GulfTerra) with a wholly owned subsidiary of
Enterprise Products Partners in September 2004 (the GulfTerra Merger) included a $26.2 million
receivable for insurance claims related to expenditures to repair property damage to certain
GulfTerra assets caused by Hurricane Ivan, which struck the U.S. Gulf Coast prior to the GulfTerra
Merger. During the first quarter of 2006, we received cash reimbursements from insurance carriers
totaling $24.1 million related to these property damage claims, and we expect to recover the
remaining $2.1 million by mid-2006. If the final recovery of funds is different than the amount
previously expended, we will recognize an income impact at that time.
In addition, we have submitted business interruption insurance claims for our estimated losses
caused by Hurricane Ivan. During the first quarter of 2006, we received claim proceeds of $10.2
million, and in April 2006 we received an additional $2 million. We expect to receive additional
receipts of approximately $5.5 million during the second quarter of 2006. To the extent we receive
cash proceeds
40
from business interruption claims, they are recorded as a gain in our statements of consolidated
operations and comprehensive income in the period of receipt.
Hurricanes Katrina and Rita insurance claims. Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, both
significant storms, affected certain of our Gulf Coast assets in August and September of 2005,
respectively. Inspection and evaluation of property damage to our facilities is a continuing
effort. To the extent that insurance proceeds from property damage claims do not cover our
expenditures (in excess of the $5 million of insurance deductibles we expensed during the third
quarter of 2005), such shortfall will be charged to earnings when realized. We have recorded $37.2
million of estimated recoveries from property damage claims based on amounts expended through March
31, 2006.
In addition, we expect to file business interruption claims for losses related to these
hurricanes. To the extent we receive cash proceeds from such business interruption claims, they
will be recorded as a gain in our statements of consolidated operations and comprehensive income in
the period of receipt.
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our primary cash requirements, in addition to normal operating expenses and debt service, are
for capital expenditures, business acquisitions and distributions to our partners. We expect to
fund our short-term needs for such items as operating expenses and sustaining capital expenditures
with operating cash flows and short-term revolving credit arrangements. Capital expenditures for
long-term needs resulting from internal growth projects and business acquisitions are expected to
be funded by a variety of sources (either separately or in combination) including cash flows from
operating activities, borrowings under commercial bank credit facilities and the issuance of
additional equity and debt securities. We expect to fund cash distributions to partners primarily
with operating cash flows. Our debt service requirements are expected to be funded by operating
cash flows and/or refinancing arrangements.
At March 31, 2006, we had $35 million of unrestricted cash on hand and approximately $1.1
billion of available credit under our Operating Partnerships Multi-Year Revolving Credit Facility.
In total, we had approximately $4.5 billion in principal outstanding under various consolidated
debt obligations at March 31, 2006.
As a result of our growth objectives, we expect to access debt and equity capital markets from
time-to-time and we believe that financing arrangements to support our growth activities can be
obtained on reasonable terms. Furthermore, we believe that maintenance of an investment grade
credit rating combined with continued ready access to debt and equity capital at reasonable rates
and sufficient trade credit to operate our businesses efficiently provide a solid foundation to
meet our long and short-term liquidity and capital resource requirements.
For additional information regarding our growth strategy, please read Capital Spending
included within this Item 2.
Credit Ratings
At May 1, 2006, the credit ratings of our Operating Partnerships debt securities were Baa3
with a stable outlook as rated by Moodys Investor Services; BBB- with a stable outlook as rated by
Fitch Ratings; and BB+ with a stable outlook as rated by Standard and Poors.
Registration Statements and Equity Offerings
From time-to-time, we issue equity or debt securities to assist us in meeting our liquidity
and capital spending requirements. We have a universal shelf registration statement on file with
the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) registering the issuance of up to $4 billion of
equity and debt securities. After taking into account the past issuance of securities under this
universal registration statement, we can issue approximately $3 billion of additional securities
under this registration statement as of May 1, 2006.
41
In March 2006, we sold 18,400,000 common units (including an over-allotment amount of
2,400,000 common units) to the public at an offering price of $23.90 per unit. Net proceeds from
this offering, including Enterprise Products GPs proportionate net capital contribution of $8.6
million, were approximately $430 million after deducting applicable underwriting discounts,
commissions and estimated offering expenses of $18.3 million. The net proceeds from this offering,
including Enterprise Products GPs proportionate net capital contribution, were used to temporarily
reduce indebtedness outstanding under our Operating Partnerships Multi-Year Revolving Credit
Facility.
Debt Obligations
For detailed information regarding our consolidated debt obligations and those of our
unconsolidated affiliates, please read Note 10 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements included under Item 1 of this quarterly report. The following table
summarizes our consolidated debt obligations at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 31, |
|
December 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Operating Partnership debt obligations:(1) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Multi-Year Revolving Credit Facility, variable rate, due October 2010(2) |
|
$ |
80,000 |
|
|
$ |
490,000 |
|
Pascagoula MBFC Loan, 8.70% fixed-rate, due March 2010 |
|
|
54,000 |
|
|
|
54,000 |
|
Senior Notes B, 7.50% fixed-rate, due February 2011 |
|
|
450,000 |
|
|
|
450,000 |
|
Senior Notes C, 6.375% fixed-rate, due February 2013 |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
Senior Notes D, 6.875% fixed-rate, due March 2033 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
Senior Notes E, 4.00% fixed-rate, due October 2007 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
Senior Notes F, 4.625% fixed-rate, due October 2009 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
Senior Notes G, 5.60% fixed-rate, due October 2014 |
|
|
650,000 |
|
|
|
650,000 |
|
Senior Notes H, 6.65% fixed-rate, due October 2034 |
|
|
350,000 |
|
|
|
350,000 |
|
Senior Notes I, 5.00% fixed-rate, due March 2015 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
Senior Notes J, 5.75% fixed-rate, due March 2035 |
|
|
250,000 |
|
|
|
250,000 |
|
Senior Notes K, 4.950% fixed-rate, due June 2010 |
|
|
500,000 |
|
|
|
500,000 |
|
Dixie Revolving Credit Facility, variable rate, due June 2007 |
|
|
17,000 |
|
|
|
17,000 |
|
Debt obligations assumed from GulfTerra |
|
|
5,068 |
|
|
|
5,068 |
|
|
|
|
Total principal amount |
|
|
4,456,068 |
|
|
|
4,866,068 |
|
Other, including unamortized discounts and premiums and changes in fair value(3) |
|
|
(59,753 |
) |
|
|
(32,287 |
) |
|
|
|
Long-term debt |
|
$ |
4,396,315 |
|
|
$ |
4,833,781 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit outstanding |
|
$ |
47,888 |
|
|
$ |
33,129 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
There have been no significant changes in the terms of our Operating Partnerships debt obligations since those reported in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005. |
|
(2) |
|
We generated net proceeds of $430 million in March 2006 in connection with the sale of 18,400,000 of our common units in an underwritten equity offering. Subsequently, this amount was
contributed to the Operating Partnership, which, in turn, used this amount to temporarily reduce debt outstanding under its Multi-Year Revolving Credit Facility. |
|
(3) |
|
The March 31, 2006 amount includes $45.8 million related to fair value hedges and $13.9 million in net unamortized discounts. The December 31, 2005 amount includes $18.2 million related
to fair value hedges and $14.1 million in net unamortized discounts. For additional information regarding our fair value hedges, please read Item 3 of this quarterly report. |
The following table summarizes the debt obligations of our unconsolidated affiliates (on
a 100% basis to the joint venture) at March 31, 2006 and our ownership interest in each entity on
that date (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ownership |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
Cameron Highway |
|
|
50.0 |
% |
|
$ |
415,000 |
|
Poseidon Oil Pipeline Company, L.L.C. (Poseidon) |
|
|
36.0 |
% |
|
|
95,000 |
|
Evangeline Gas Pipeline Company, L.P. |
|
|
49.5 |
% |
|
|
30,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
540,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
42
In March 2006, Cameron Highway amended the note purchase agreement governing its senior
secured notes to primarily address the effect of reduced deliveries of crude oil to Cameron Highway
resulting from production delays caused by the lingering effects of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
In general, this amendment modified certain financial covenants in light of production forecasts.
In addition, the amendment increased the letters of credit required to be issued by our Operating
Partnership and an affiliate of our joint venture partner from $18.4 million each to $36.8 million
each.
Cash Flows from Operating, Investing and Financing Activities
The following table summarizes our cash flows from operating, investing and financing
activities for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands). For information regarding the
individual components of our cash flow amounts, please see the Unaudited Condensed Statements of
Consolidated Cash Flows included under Item 1 of this quarterly report.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Net cash provided from operating activities |
|
$ |
494,276 |
|
|
$ |
164,246 |
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
348,645 |
|
|
|
349,193 |
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
|
|
(152,738 |
) |
|
|
218,121 |
|
The following information highlights the significant quarter-to-quarter variances in our
cash flow amounts:
Comparison of Three Months Ended March 31, 2006 with Three Months Ended March 31, 2005
Operating activities. Net cash provided from operating activities was $494.3 million
in the first quarter of 2006 compared to $164.2 million in the first quarter of 2005. The $330.1
million quarter-to-quarter increase in net cash provided from operating activities is primarily due
to:
|
§ |
|
Net income adjusted for all non-cash items and the net effects of changes in operating
accounts increased $343.6 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to (i) reductions in
the level of inventory and (ii) the timing of cash collections during the periods. |
|
|
§ |
|
Distributions received from unconsolidated affiliates decreased by $13.6 million
quarter-to-quarter primarily due to (i) a decrease in distributions from VESCO resulting
from facility down-time and repair costs in the first quarter of 2006 caused by damage
inflicted by Hurricane Katrina and (ii) our receipt of a special distribution from
Deepwater Gateway, L.L.C. (Deepwater Gateway) in March 2005 in connection with the
repayment of its term loan. |
Investing activities. Cash used in investing activities was $348.6 million in the
first quarter of 2006 compared to $349.2 million in the first quarter of 2005. Expenditures for
growth and sustaining capital projects (net of contributions in aid of construction costs)
increased $100.2 million quarter-to-quarter primarily due to cash payments associated with our
projects in the Rocky Mountains and Gulf of Mexico. In addition, during the first quarter of 2006
we spent $53.5 million in connection with our Jonah expansion project. Our cash outlays for asset
purchases and business combinations were $38.1 million in the first quarter of 2006 versus $150.5
million in the first quarter of 2005. For additional information related to our capital spending
program, please read Capital Spending included within this Item 2.
Our investments in unconsolidated affiliates decreased from $80.6 million in the first quarter
of 2005 to $8 million in the first quarter of 2006. In March 2005, we contributed $72 million to
Deepwater Gateway to fund our share of the repayment of its term loan.
Cash inflows related to investing activities for the first quarter of 2005 includes a $42.1
million cash receipt from the sale of our investment in Starfish Pipeline Company, LLC
(Starfish). The sale of
43
our Starfish investment was required by the Federal Trade Commission in order to gain its
approval for the GulfTerra Merger.
Financing activities. Cash used in financing activities was $152.7 million in the
first quarter of 2006 compared to cash provided by operating activities of $218.1 million in the
first quarter of 2005. We had net repayments under our debt agreements of $410 million during the
first quarter of 2006 versus net repayments of $118.8 million during the first quarter of 2005. We
used $430 million of net proceeds from our March 2006 equity offering to reduce debt outstanding
under our Operating Partnerships Multi-Year Revolving Credit Facility during the first quarter of
2006.
In February 2005, our Operating Partnership issued an aggregate of $500 million in senior
notes, the proceeds of which were used to repay $350 million due under its Senior Notes A and to
temporarily reduce amounts outstanding under its other bank credit facilities. Also during the
first quarter of 2005, the Operating Partnership repaid $242.2 million then outstanding under its
364-Day Acquisition Credit Facility (which was used to finance elements of the GulfTerra Merger)
using proceeds generated from our February 2005 equity offering.
Net proceeds from the issuance of limited partner interests were $440.9 million in the first
quarter of 2006 compared to $501 million in the first quarter of 2005. We issued 18,818,190 common
units during the first quarter of 2006 and 18,766,561 common units during the first quarter of
2005. Net proceeds from underwritten equity offerings were $430 million during the first quarter
of 2006 reflecting the sale of 18,400,000 units and $456.7 million during the first quarter of 2005
reflecting the sale of 17,250,000 units. We used net proceeds from these underwritten offerings to
reduce debt, including the temporary repayment of indebtedness under bank credit facilities. Our
distribution reinvestment program and related plan generated net proceeds of $10.2 million in the
first quarter of 2006 and $39 million in the first quarter of 2005. We used net proceeds from
these offerings for general partnership purposes.
Cash distributions to partners increased from $164.7 million in the first quarter of 2005 to
$193.5 million in the first quarter of 2006 primarily due to an increase in our common units
outstanding and our quarterly cash distribution rates. Cash contributions from minority interests
were $11.4 million in the first quarter of 2006 compared to $6.3 million in the first quarter of
2005. These amounts represent contributions from our joint venture partner in the Independence Hub
project.
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
Since December 31, 2005, scheduled maturities of long-term debt decreased $410 million
primarily due to the application of net proceeds generated by our equity offering in March 2006 to
temporarily reduce debt outstanding under our Operating Partnerships Multi-Year Revolving Credit
Facility. For additional information regarding our debt obligations, please read Note 10 of the
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1 of this
quarterly report. Also, we renewed our lease of the Wilson natural gas storage facility for an
additional 20-year period during the first quarter of 2006. For additional information regarding
our commitments under this significant lease, please read Note 15 of the Notes to Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1 of this quarterly report.
Other than the two items noted in the previous paragraph, there have been no significant
changes with regard to our material contractual obligations (outside of the ordinary course of
business) since those reported in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
In March 2006, Cameron Highway amended the note purchase agreement governing its senior
secured notes to primarily address the effect of reduced deliveries of crude oil to Cameron Highway
resulting from production delays caused by the lingering effects of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita.
In general, this amendment modified certain financial covenants in light of production forecasts.
In addition, the
44
amendment increased the letters of credit required to be issued by our Operating Partnership
and an affiliate of our joint venture partner from $18.4 million each to $36.8 million each.
In May 2006, Poseidon amended its revolving credit facility, which, among other things,
decreased the availability to $150 million from $170 million and extended the maturity date from
January 2008 to May 2011.
Other than the amendments discussed above, there have been no significant changes with regard
to our off-balance sheet arrangements since those reported in our annual report on Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 2005.
RECENT ACCOUNTING DEVELOPMENTS
During the first quarter of 2006, we adopted the provisions of Emerging Issues Task Force
(EITF) 04-13, Accounting for Purchases and Sale of Inventory With the Same Counterparty. Our
adoption of this guidance had no impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash
flows. For additional information regarding EITF 04-13, please read Note 2 of the Notes to
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1 of this quarterly
report.
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
In our financial reporting process, we employ methods, estimates and assumptions that affect
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
as of the date of our financial statements. These methods, estimates and assumptions also affect
the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Investors should be
aware that actual results could differ from these estimates if the underlying assumptions prove to
be incorrect.
In general, there have been no significant changes in our critical accounting policies since
December 31, 2005. For a detailed discussion of these policies, please read Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical Accounting
Policies in our annual report on Form 10-K for 2005. The following describes the estimation risk
underlying our most significant financial statement items:
Depreciation methods and estimated useful lives of property, plant and equipment
In general, depreciation is the systematic and rational allocation of an assets cost, less
its residual value (if any), to the periods it benefits. The majority of our property, plant and
equipment is depreciated using the straight-line method, which results in depreciation expense
being incurred evenly over the life of the assets. Our estimate of depreciation incorporates
assumptions regarding the useful economic lives and residual values of our assets. At the time we
place our assets in service, we believe such assumptions are reasonable; however, circumstances may
develop that would cause us to change these assumptions, which would change our depreciation
amounts on a going forward basis.
At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the net book value of our property, plant and
equipment was $8.8 billion and $8.7 billion, respectively. For additional information regarding
our property, plant and equipment, please read Note 6 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1 of this quarterly report.
Measuring recoverability of long-lived assets and equity method investments
In general, long-lived assets (including intangible assets with finite useful lives and
property, plant and equipment) are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that their carrying amount may not be recoverable. Equity method
investments are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that
there is a possible loss in value for the investment other than a temporary decline. Measuring the
potential impairment of such assets and investments involves the estimation of future cash flows to
be derived from the asset being tested. Our
45
estimates of such cash flows are based on a number of assumptions including anticipated
margins and volumes; estimated useful life of asset or asset group; and salvage values. A
significant change in these underlying assumptions could result in our recording an impairment
charge.
Amortization methods and estimated useful lives of qualifying intangible assets
In general, our intangible asset portfolio consists primarily of the estimated values assigned
to certain customer relationships and customer contracts. We amortize the customer relationship
values using methods that closely resemble the pattern in which the economic benefits of the
underlying oil and natural gas resource bases from which the customers produce are estimated to be
consumed or otherwise used. We amortize the customer contract intangible assets over the estimated
remaining economic life of the underlying contract. A change in the estimates we use to determine
amortization rates of our intangible assets (e.g., oil and natural gas production curves, remaining
economic life of the contracts, etc.) could result in a material change in the amortization expense
we record and the carrying value of our intangible assets.
At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the carrying value of our intangible asset portfolio
was $930.1 million and $913.6 million, respectively. For additional information regarding our
intangible assets, please read Note 9 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements included under Item 1 of this quarterly report.
Methods we employ to measure the fair value of goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase prices we paid for certain businesses over
their respective fair values and is primarily comprised of $387.1 million associated with the
GulfTerra Merger. We do not amortize goodwill; however, we test our goodwill (at the reporting
unit level) for impairment during the second quarter of each fiscal year, and more frequently, if
circumstances indicate it is more likely than not that the fair value of goodwill is below its
carrying amount. Our goodwill testing involves the determination of a reporting units fair value,
which is predicated on our assumptions regarding the future economic prospects of the reporting
unit. Our estimates of such prospects (i.e., cash flows) are based on a number of assumptions
including anticipated margins and volumes of the underlying assets or asset group. A significant
change in these underlying assumptions could result in our recording an impairment charge.
At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, the carrying value of our goodwill was $494 million.
For additional information regarding our goodwill, please read Note 9 of the Notes to Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1 of this quarterly report.
Our revenue recognition policies and use of estimates for revenues and expenses
Our use of certain estimates for revenues and operating costs and other expenses has increased
as a result of SEC regulations that require us to submit financial information on accelerated time
frames. Such estimates are necessary due to the timing of compiling actual billing information and
receiving third-party data needed to record transactions for financial reporting purposes. If the
basis of our estimates proves to be substantially incorrect, it could result in material
adjustments in results of operations between periods.
Reserves for environmental matters
Each of our business segments is subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations
governing environmental quality and pollution control. Such laws and regulations may, in certain
instances, require us to remediate current or former operating sites where specified substances
have been released or disposed of. We accrue reserves for environmental matters when our
assessments indicate that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and an amount can be
reasonably estimated. Our assessments are based on studies, as well as site surveys, to determine
the extent of any environmental damage and the necessary requirements to remediate this damage.
Future environmental developments, such as increasingly strict
46
environmental laws and additional claims for damages to property, employees and other
persons resulting from current or past operations, could result in substantial additional costs
beyond our current reserves.
At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we had a liability for environmental remediation of
$21 million, which was derived from a range of reasonable estimates based upon studies and site
surveys. In accordance with SFAS 5 Accounting for Contingencies and Financial Accounting
Standards Board Interpretation (FIN) 14, Reasonable Estimation of the Amount of a Loss, we
recorded our best estimate of these remediation activities.
Natural gas imbalances
Natural gas imbalances result when customers physically deliver a larger or smaller quantity
of natural gas into our pipelines than they take out. In general, we value such imbalances using a
twelve-month moving average of natural gas prices, which we believe is reasonable given that the
actual settlement dates for such imbalances are generally not known. As a result, significant
changes in natural gas prices between reporting periods may impact our estimates.
At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, our imbalance receivables were $82 million and $89.4
million, respectively, and are reflected as a component of accounts receivable. At March 31, 2006
and December 31, 2005, our imbalance payables were $66.6 million and $80.5 million, respectively,
and are reflected as a component of accrued gas payables.
SUMMARY OF RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In accordance with SFAS 57, Related Party Disclosures, we have identified our material
related party revenues and costs and expenses. The following table summarizes our related party
transactions for the periods indicated (dollars in thousands).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Revenues from consolidated operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPCO and affiliates |
|
$ |
5,632 |
|
|
$ |
284 |
|
Unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
84,443 |
|
|
|
57,909 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
90,075 |
|
|
$ |
58,193 |
|
|
|
|
Operating costs and expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPCO and affiliates |
|
$ |
94,957 |
|
|
$ |
59,003 |
|
Unconsolidated affiliates |
|
|
6,686 |
|
|
|
6,568 |
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
101,643 |
|
|
$ |
65,571 |
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPCO and affiliates |
|
$ |
11,008 |
|
|
$ |
9,675 |
|
|
|
|
For additional information regarding our related party transactions identified in
accordance with GAAP, please read Note 13 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements included under Item 1 of this quarterly report.
We have an extensive and ongoing relationship with EPCO and its affiliates, including TEPPCO.
Our revenues from EPCO and affiliates are primarily associated with sales of NGL products. Our
expenses with EPCO are primarily due to (i) reimbursements we pay EPCO in connection with an
administrative services agreement and (ii) purchases of NGL products. TEPPCO is an affiliate of
ours due to the common control relationship of both entities.
Many of our unconsolidated affiliates perform supporting or complementary roles to our
consolidated business operations. The majority of our revenues from unconsolidated affiliates
relate to natural gas sales to a Louisiana affiliate. The majority of our expenses with
unconsolidated affiliates
47
pertain to payments we make to K/D/S Promix, LLC for NGL transportation, storage and fractionation
services.
At March 31, 2006, other assets includes $55.3 million related to our Jonah expansion project
with TEPPCO. For additional information, see Note 13 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements included under Item 1 of this quarterly report.
OTHER ITEMS
Non-GAAP reconciliation
The following table presents a reconciliation of total non-GAAP gross operating margin to GAAP
operating income and income before provision for income taxes, minority interest and the cumulative
effect of change in accounting principle (dollars in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months |
|
|
Ended March 31, |
|
|
2006 |
|
2005 |
|
|
|
Total non-GAAP gross operating margin |
|
$ |
312,523 |
|
|
$ |
275,214 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile total non-GAAP gross operating margin
to GAAP operating income: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation, amortization and accretion in operating
costs and expenses |
|
|
(104,816 |
) |
|
|
(99,965 |
) |
Operating lease expense paid by EPCO |
|
|
(528 |
) |
|
|
(528 |
) |
Gain on sale of assets in operating costs and expenses |
|
|
61 |
|
|
|
5,436 |
|
General and administrative costs |
|
|
(13,740 |
) |
|
|
(14,693 |
) |
|
|
|
GAAP consolidated operating income |
|
|
193,500 |
|
|
|
165,464 |
|
Other expense |
|
|
(56,108 |
) |
|
|
(52,494 |
) |
|
|
|
GAAP income before provision for income taxes, minority interest
and cumulative effect of change in accounting principle |
|
$ |
137,392 |
|
|
$ |
112,970 |
|
|
|
|
EPCO subleases to us certain equipment located at our Mont Belvieu facility and 100
railcars for $1 per year (the retained leases). These subleases are part of an administrative
services agreement between EPCO and us that was executed in connection with our formation in 1998.
EPCO holds this equipment pursuant to operating leases for which it has retained the corresponding
cash lease payment obligation. We record the full value of such lease payments made by EPCO as a
non-cash related party operating expense, with the offset to partners equity recorded as a general
contribution to our partnership. Apart from the partnership interests we granted to EPCO at our
formation, EPCO does not receive any additional ownership rights as a result of its contribution of
the retained leases to us.
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle
Net income for the first quarter of 2006 includes a non-cash benefit of $1.5 million related
to the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle resulting from our adoption of SFAS
123(R) on January 1, 2006. For additional information regarding this cumulative effect adjustment,
please read Note 3 of the Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included
under Item 1 of this quarterly report.
Financial statement reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years financial statements to conform
to the current year presentation. During the second quarter of 2005, we changed the classification
of changes in restricted cash in our Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows to
present such changes as an investing activity. We previously presented such changes as an
operating activity. In the accompanying Unaudited Condensed Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows
for the three months ended March 31, 2005, we reclassified the change in restricted cash to be
consistent with our current presentation. This reclassification resulted in a $15.8 million
decrease to cash flows used in investing activities and a
48
corresponding decrease to cash provided from operating activities from the amounts previously
presented for the three months ended March 31, 2005.
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION AND RISK FACTORS
This quarterly report contains various forward-looking statements and information that are
based on our beliefs and those of Enterprise Products GP, our general partner, as well as
assumptions made by us and information currently available to us. When used in this document,
words such as anticipate, project, expect, plan, goal, forecast, intend, could,
believe, may and similar expressions and statements regarding our plans and objectives for
future operations, are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Although we and our
general partner believe that such expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are
reasonable, neither we nor Enterprise Products GP can give any assurance that such expectations
will prove to be correct. Such statements are subject to a variety of risks, uncertainties and
assumptions. If one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or if underlying
assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results may vary materially from those anticipated,
estimated, projected or expected. You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking
statements. When considering forward-looking statements, please see Part II, Item 1A, Risk
Factors, included within this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
We are exposed to financial market risks, including changes in commodity prices and interest
rates. We may use financial instruments (i.e., futures, forwards, swaps, options and other
financial instruments with similar characteristics) to mitigate the risks of certain identifiable
and anticipated transactions. In general, the type of risks we attempt to hedge are those related
to the variability of future earnings, fair values of certain debt instruments and cash flows
resulting from changes in applicable interest rates or commodity prices. As a matter of policy, we
do not use financial instruments for speculative (or trading) purposes.
Interest Rate Risk Hedging Program
Our interest rate exposure results from variable and fixed rate borrowings under debt
agreements. We manage a portion of our interest rate exposures by utilizing interest rate swaps
and similar arrangements, which allow us to convert a portion of fixed rate debt into variable rate
debt or a portion of variable rate debt into fixed rate debt.
As summarized in the following table, we had eleven interest rate swap agreements outstanding
at March 31, 2006 that were accounted for as fair value hedges.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number |
|
Period Covered |
|
Termination |
|
Fixed to |
|
Notional |
Hedged Fixed Rate Debt |
|
Of Swaps |
|
by Swap |
|
Date of Swap |
|
Variable Rate (1) |
|
Amount |
|
Senior Notes B, 7.50% fixed rate, due Feb. 2011 |
|
|
1 |
|
|
Jan. 2004 to Feb. 2011 |
|
Feb. 2011 |
|
7.50% to 8.15% |
|
$ 50 million |
Senior Notes C, 6.375% fixed rate, due Feb. 2013 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Jan. 2004 to Feb. 2013 |
|
Feb. 2013 |
|
6.375% to 6.69% |
|
$200 million |
Senior Notes G, 5.6% fixed rate, due Oct. 2014 |
|
|
6 |
|
|
4th Qtr. 2004 to Oct. 2014 |
|
Oct. 2014 |
|
5.6% to 5.27% |
|
$600 million |
Senior Notes K, 4.95% fixed rate, due June 2010 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
Aug. 2005 to June 2010 |
|
June 2010 |
|
4.95% to 4.99% |
|
$200 million |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
The variable rate indicated is the all-in variable rate for the current settlement period. |
The total fair value of these eleven interest rate swaps at March 31, 2006 and December
31, 2005, was a liability of $46.8 million and $19.2 million, respectively, with an offsetting
decrease in the fair value of the underlying debt. Interest expense for the three months ended
March 31, 2006 and 2005 reflects a $0.2 million and $4.6 million benefit from these swap
agreements, respectively.
49
The following tables show the effect of hypothetical price movements on the estimated fair
value (FV) of our interest rate swap portfolio and the related change in fair value of the
underlying debt at the dates indicated (dollars in thousands). Income is not affected by changes
in the fair value of these swaps; however, these swaps effectively convert the hedged portion of
fixed-rate debt to variable-rate debt. As a result, interest expense (and related cash outlays
for debt service) will increase or decrease with the change in the periodic reset rate associated
with the respective swap. Typically, the reset rate is an agreed upon index rate published for the
first day of the six-month interest calculation period.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resulting |
|
Swap Fair Value at |
Scenario |
|
Classification |
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
April 27, 2006 |
|
FV assuming no change in underlying interest rates
|
|
Asset (Liability)
|
|
$ |
(46,798 |
) |
|
$ |
(55,816 |
) |
FV assuming 10% increase in underlying interest rates
|
|
Asset (Liability)
|
|
|
(79,617 |
) |
|
|
(88,125 |
) |
FV assuming 10% decrease in underlying interest rates
|
|
Asset (Liability)
|
|
|
(13,980 |
) |
|
|
(23,507 |
) |
The change in fair value of our interest rate swaps since December 31, 2005 is primarily
due to an increase in interest rates.
Commodity Risk Hedging Program
The prices of natural gas, NGLs and petrochemical products are subject to fluctuations in
response to changes in supply, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors that are
beyond our control. In order to manage the risks associated with natural gas and NGLs, we may
enter into commodity financial instruments. The primary purpose of our commodity risk management
activities is to hedge our exposure to price risks associated with (i) natural gas purchases, (ii)
NGL production and inventories, (iii) related firm commitments, (iv) fluctuations in transportation
revenues where the underlying fees are based on natural gas index prices and (v) certain
anticipated transactions involving either natural gas or NGLs.
At March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005, we had a limited number of commodity financial
instruments in our portfolio, which primarily consisted of economic hedges. The fair value of our
commodity financial instrument portfolio at March 31, 2006 and December 31, 2005 was an asset of
$1.1 million and a liability of $0.1 million, respectively. We recorded nominal amounts of
earnings from our commodity financial instruments during the three months ended March 31, 2006 and
2005.
We assess the risk of our commodity financial instrument portfolio using a sensitivity
analysis model. The sensitivity analysis applied to this portfolio measures the potential income
or loss (i.e., the change in fair value of the portfolio) based upon a hypothetical 10% movement in
the underlying quoted market prices of the commodity financial instruments outstanding at the dates
indicated within the following table. The following table shows the effect of hypothetical price
movements on the estimated fair value of this portfolio at the dates indicated (dollars in
thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Resulting |
|
Commodity Financial Instrument Portfolio FV |
Scenario |
|
Classification |
|
March 31, 2006 |
|
April 27, 2006 |
|
FV assuming no change in underlying commodity prices |
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
$ |
1,079 |
|
|
$ |
(3,561 |
) |
FV assuming 10% increase in underlying commodity prices |
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
|
(4,028 |
) |
|
|
(3,987 |
) |
FV assuming 10% decrease in underlying commodity prices |
|
Asset (Liability) |
|
|
6,186 |
|
|
|
(3,135 |
) |
The change in fair value of our commodity risk hedging portfolio from March 31, 2006 to
April 27, 2006 is primarily due to an increase in natural gas prices.
50
Effect of financial instruments on accumulated other comprehensive income
The following table summarizes the effect of our cash flow hedging financial instruments on
accumulated other comprehensive income since December 31, 2005.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest Rate Fin. Instrs. |
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forward- |
|
Other |
|
|
Commodity |
|
|
|
|
|
Starting |
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Financial |
|
Treasury |
|
Interest |
|
Income |
|
|
Instruments |
|
Locks |
|
Rate Swaps |
|
Balance |
|
Balance, December 31, 2005 |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
4,127 |
|
|
$ |
14,945 |
|
|
$ |
19,072 |
|
Change in fair value of commodity financial instruments |
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
251 |
|
Reclassification of gain on settlement of interest
rate financial instruments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(925 |
) |
|
|
(1,041 |
) |
|
|
|
Balance, March 31, 2006 |
|
$ |
251 |
|
|
$ |
4,011 |
|
|
$ |
14,020 |
|
|
$ |
18,282 |
|
|
|
|
During the remainder of 2006, we will reclassify a combined $3.2 million from accumulated
other comprehensive income as a reduction in interest expense from our treasury locks and
forward-starting interest rate swaps.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures.
Our management, with the participation of the chief executive officer (CEO) and chief
financial officer (CFO) of our general partner, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures, including internal controls over financial reporting, as of the end of the
period covered by this report. Based on their evaluation, the CEO and CFO of our general partner
have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures, including internal controls over
financial reporting, are effective to ensure that material information relating to our partnership
is made known to management on a timely basis. Our CEO and CFO noted no material weaknesses in the
design or operation of our internal controls over financial reporting that are likely to adversely
affect our ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information. Also, they
detected no fraud involving management or employees who have a significant role in our internal
controls over financial reporting.
There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in
Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that have not been evaluated by
management and no other factors that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially
affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal controls over financial
reporting.
Collectively, these disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide us with
reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports filed
with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in
the SECs rules and forms. Our management does not expect that our disclosure controls and
procedures will prevent all errors and all fraud. Based on the inherent limitations in all control
systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and
instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.
The certifications of our general partners CEO and CFO required under Sections 302 and 906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 have been included as exhibits to this quarterly report on Form
10-Q.
51
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION.
Item 1. Legal Proceedings.
See Part I, Item 1, Financial Statements, Note 15, Litigation, which is incorporated herein
by reference.
Item 1A. Risk Factors.
In general, there have been no significant changes in our risk factors since December 31,
2005. For a detailed discussion of our risk factors, please read, Item 1A Risk Factors, in our
annual report on Form 10-K for 2005.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
We did not repurchase any of our common units during the three months ended March 31, 2006.
As of March 31, 2006, we and our affiliates are authorized to repurchase up to 618,400 common units
under the December 1998 common unit repurchase program.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
None.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.
None.
Item 5. Other Information.
None.
Item 6. Exhibits.
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit* |
2.1
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement between Coral Energy, LLC and
Enterprise Products Operating L.P. dated September 22, 2000
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K
filed September 26, 2000). |
2.2
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated January 16, 2002 by and
between Diamond-Koch, L.P. and Diamond-Koch III, L.P. and
Enterprise Products Texas Operating L.P. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed February 8,
2002.) |
2.3
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated January 31, 2002 by and
between D-K Diamond-Koch, L.L.C., Diamond-Koch, L.P. and
Diamond-Koch III, L.P. as Sellers and Enterprise Products
Operating L.P. as Buyer (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed February 8, 2002). |
2.4
|
|
Purchase Agreement by and between E-Birchtree, LLC and
Enterprise Products Operating L.P. dated July 31, 2002
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Form 8-K filed
August 12, 2002). |
2.5
|
|
Purchase Agreement by and between E-Birchtree, LLC and
E-Cypress, LLC dated July 31, 2002 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed August 12,
2002). |
2.6
|
|
Merger Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2003, by and
among Enterprise Products Partners L.P., Enterprise
Products GP, LLC, Enterprise Products Management LLC,
GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P. and GulfTerra Energy
Company, L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1
to Form 8-K filed December 15, 2003). |
2.7
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Merger Agreement, dated as of August 31,
2004, by and among Enterprise Products Partners L.P.,
Enterprise Products GP, LLC, Enterprise Products Management
LLC, GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P. and GulfTerra Energy
Company, L.L.C. (incorporated by |
52
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit* |
|
|
reference to Exhibit 2.1
to Form 8-K filed September 7, 2004). |
2.8
|
|
Parent Company Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2003, by
and among Enterprise Products Partners L.P., Enterprise
Products GP, LLC, Enterprise Products GTM, LLC, El Paso
Corporation, Sabine River Investors I, L.L.C., Sabine River
Investors II, L.L.C., El Paso EPN Investments, L.L.C. and
GulfTerra GP Holding Company (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.2 to Form 8-K filed December 15, 2003). |
2.9
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Parent Company Agreement, dated as of
April 19, 2004, by and among Enterprise Products Partners
L.P., Enterprise Products GP, LLC, Enterprise Products GTM,
LLC, El Paso Corporation, Sabine River Investors I, L.L.C.,
Sabine River Investors II, L.L.C., El Paso EPN Investments,
L.L.C. and GulfTerra GP Holding Company (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K filed April 21,
2004). |
2.10
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company
Agreement of GulfTerra Energy Company, L.L.C., adopted by
GulfTerra GP Holding Company, a Delaware corporation, and
Enterprise Products GTM, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company, as of December 15, 2003, (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.3 to Form 8-K filed December 15,
2003). |
2.11
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Limited
Liability Company Agreement of GulfTerra Energy Company,
L.L.C. adopted by Enterprise Products GTM, LLC as of
September 30, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
2.11 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 Registration
Statement, Reg. No. 333-121665, filed December 27, 2004). |
2.12
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement (Gas Plants), dated as of
December 15, 2003, by and between El Paso Corporation, El
Paso Field Services Management, Inc., El Paso Transmission,
L.L.C., El Paso Field Services Holding Company and
Enterprise Products Operating L.P. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.4 to Form 8-K filed December 15,
2003). |
3.1
|
|
Fifth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership
of Enterprise Products Partners L.P., dated effective as of
August 8, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Form 8-K filed August 10, 2005). |
3.2
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company
Agreement of Enterprise Products GP, LLC, dated as of
August 29, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
to Form 8-K filed September 1, 2005). |
3.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of
Enterprise Products Operating L.P. dated as of July 31,
1998 (restated to include all agreements through December
10, 2003)(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form
8-K filed July 1, 2005). |
3.4
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Enterprise Products OLPGP,
Inc., dated December 3, 2003 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.5 to Form S-4 Registration Statement, Reg. No.
333-121665, filed December 27, 2004). |
3.5
|
|
Bylaws of Enterprise Products OLPGP, Inc., dated December
8, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to Form
S-4 Registration Statement, Reg. No. 333-121665, filed
December 27, 2004). |
4.1
|
|
Indenture dated as of March 15, 2000, among Enterprise
Products Operating L.P., as Issuer, Enterprise Products
Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and First Union National Bank,
as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Form 8-K filed March 10, 2000). |
4.2
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 22, 2003,
among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer,
Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and
Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registration
Statement on Form S-4, Reg. No. 333-102776, filed January
28, 2003). |
4.3
|
|
Global Note representing $350 million principal amount of
6.375% Series B Senior Notes due 2013 with attached
Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to
Registration Statement on Form S-4, Reg. No. 333-102776,
filed January 28, 2003). |
4.4
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 14,
2003, among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer,
Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and
Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 10-K
filed March 31, 2003). |
4.5
|
|
Global Note representing $500 million principal amount of
6.875% Series B Senior Notes due 2033 with attached
Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Form
10-K filed March 31, 2003). |
4.6
|
|
Global Notes representing $450 million principal amount of
7.50% Senior Notes due 2011 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed January 25, 2001). |
53
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit* |
4.7
|
|
Form of Common Unit certificate (incorporated by
reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1/A;
File No. 333-52537, filed July 21, 1998). |
4.8
|
|
Contribution Agreement dated September 17, 1999
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit B to Schedule 13D
filed September 27, 1999 by Tejas Energy, LLC). |
4.9
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated September 17, 1999
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit E to Schedule 13D
filed September 27, 1999 by Tejas Energy, LLC). |
4.10
|
|
Unitholder Rights Agreement dated September 17, 1999
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit C to Schedule 13D
filed September 27, 1999 by Tejas Energy, LLC). |
4.11
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated September 12, 2003, to Unitholder
Rights Agreement dated September 17, 1999 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed September 15,
2003). |
4.12
|
|
Agreement dated as of March 4, 2005 among Enterprise
Products Partners L.P., Shell US Gas & Power LLC and Kayne
Anderson MLP Investment Company (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.31 to Form S-3 Registration Statement, Reg.
No. 333-123150, filed March 4, 2005). |
4.13
|
|
$750 Million Multi-Year Revolving Credit Agreement dated as
of August 25, 2004, among Enterprise Products Operating
L.P., the Lenders party thereto, Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Administrative Agent, Citibank, N.A. and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Co-Syndication Agents, and Mizuho
Corporate Bank, Ltd., SunTrust Bank and The Bank of Nova
Scotia, as Co-Documentation Agents (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on August 30,
2004). |
4.14
|
|
Guaranty Agreement dated as of August 25, 2004, by
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. in favor of Wachovia
Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent for the
several lenders that are or become parties to the Credit
Agreement included as Exhibit 4.13, above (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on August 30,
2004). |
4.15
|
|
First Amendment dated October 5, 2005, to Multi-Year
Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of August 25, 2004,
among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., the Lenders party
thereto, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
Administrative Agent, CitiBank, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase
Bank, as CO-Syndication Agents, and Mizuho Corporate Bank,
Ltd., SunTrust Bank and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as
Co-Documentation Agents (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on October 7, 2005). |
4.16
|
|
$2.25 Billion 364-Day Revolving Credit Agreement dated as
of August 25, 2004, among Enterprise Products Operating
L.P., the Lenders party thereto, Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Administrative Agent, Citicorp North
America, Inc. and Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., as
Co-Syndication Agents, JPMorgan Chase Bank, UBS Loan
Finance LLC and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as
Co-Documentation Agents, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC,
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Lehman Brothers Inc., as
Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Runners (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on August 30,
2004). |
4.17
|
|
Guaranty Agreement dated as of August 25, 2004, by
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. in favor of Wachovia
Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent for the
several lenders that are or become parties to the Credit
Agreement included as Exhibit 4.16, above (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed on August 30,
2004). |
4.18
|
|
Indenture dated as of October 4, 2004, among Enterprise
Products Operating L.P., as Issuer, Enterprise Products
Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on October 6, 2004). |
4.19
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 4, 2004,
among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer,
Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on October 6,
2004). |
4.20
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 4, 2004,
among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer,
Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on October 6,
2004). |
4.21
|
|
Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 4, 2004,
among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer,
Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed on October 6,
2004). |
4.22
|
|
Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 4, 2004,
among Enterprise Products Operating |
54
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit* |
|
|
L.P., as Issuer,
Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Form 8-K filed on October 6,
2004). |
4.23
|
|
Global Note representing $500 million principal amount of
4.000% Series B Senior Notes due 2007 with attached
Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14 to
Form S-3 Registration Statement Reg. No. 333-123150 filed
on March 4, 2005). |
4.24
|
|
Global Note representing $500 million principal amount of
5.600% Series B Senior Notes due 2014 with attached
Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 to
Form S-3 Registration Statement Reg. No. 333-123150 filed
on March 4, 2005). |
4.25
|
|
Global Note representing $150 million principal amount of
5.600% Series B Senior Notes due 2014 with attached
Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.18 to
Form S-3 Registration Statement Reg. No. 333-123150 filed
on March 4, 2005). |
4.26
|
|
Global Note representing $350 million principal amount of
6.650% Series B Senior Notes due 2034 with attached
Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.19 to
Form S-3 Registration Statement Reg. No. 333-123150 filed
on March 4, 2005). |
4.27
|
|
Global Note representing $500 million principal amount of
4.625% Series B Senior Notes due 2009 with attached
Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.27 to
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed on
March 15, 2005). |
4.28
|
|
Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 2, 2005,
among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer,
Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on March 3,
2005). |
4.29
|
|
Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 2, 2005,
among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer,
Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on March 3,
2005). |
4.30
|
|
Global Note representing $250,000,000 principal amount of
5.00% Series B Senior Notes due 2015 with attached
Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.31 to
Form 10-Q filed on November 4, 2005). |
4.31
|
|
Global Note representing $250,000,000 principal amount of
5.75% Series B Senior Notes due 2035 with attached
Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.32 to
Form 10-Q filed on November 4, 2005). |
4.32
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of March 2, 2005,
among Enterprise Products Partners L.P., Enterprise
Products Operating L.P. and the Initial Purchasers named
therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Form
8-K filed on March 3, 2005). |
4.33
|
|
Assumption Agreement dated as of September 30, 2004 between
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. and GulfTerra Energy
Partners, L.P. relating to the assumption by Enterprise
Products Partners of GulfTerras obligations under the
GulfTerra Series F2 Convertible Units (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K/A-1 filed on October
5, 2004). |
4.34
|
|
Statement of Rights, Privileges and Limitations of Series F
Convertible Units, included as Annex A to Third Amendment
to the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership of GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P., dated May
16, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.B.3 to
Current Report on Form 8-K of GulfTerra Energy Partners,
L.P., file no. 001-11680, filed with the Commission on May
19, 2003). |
4.35
|
|
Unitholder Agreement between GulfTerra Energy Partners,
L.P. and Fletcher International, Inc. dated May 16, 2003
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.L to Current Report
on Form 8-K of GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P., file no.
001-11680, filed with the Commission on May 19, 2003). |
4.36
|
|
Indenture dated as of May 17, 2001 among GulfTerra Energy
Partners, L.P., GulfTerra Energy Finance Corporation, the
Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and the Chase Manhattan
Bank, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to GulfTerras
Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed June 25, 2001,
Registration Nos. 333-63800 through 333-63800-20); First
Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 18, 2002 (filed as
Exhibit 4.E.1 to GulfTerras 2002 First Quarter Form 10-Q);
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 18, 2002
(filed as Exhibit 4.E.2 to GulfTerras 2002 First Quarter
Form 10-Q); Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of
October 10, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 4.E.3 to GulfTerras
2002 Third Quarter Form 10-Q); Fourth Supplemental
Indenture dated as of November 27, 2002 (filed as Exhibit
4.E.1 to GulfTerras Current Report on Form 8-K dated |
55
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit* |
|
|
March 19, 2003); Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of January
1, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 4.E.2 to GulfTerras Current
Report on Form 8-K dated March 19, 2003); Sixth
Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 20, 2003 (filed as
Exhibit 4.E.1 to GulfTerras 2003 Second Quarter Form 10-Q,
file no. 001-11680). |
4.37
|
|
Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 17, 2004
(filed as Exhibit 4.E.1 to GulfTerras Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on August 19, 2004, file no. 001-11680). |
4.38
|
|
Indenture dated as of November 27, 2002 by and among
GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P., GulfTerra Energy Finance
Corporation, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to
GulfTerras Current Report of Form 8-K dated December 11,
2002); First Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 1,
2003 (filed as Exhibit 4.1.1 to GulfTerras Current Report
on Form 8-K dated March 19, 2003); Second Supplemental
Indenture dated as of June 20, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 4.1.1
to GulfTerras 2003 Second Quarter Form 10-Q, file no.
001-11680). |
4.39
|
|
Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 17, 2004
(filed as Exhibit 4.1.1 to GulfTerras Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on August 19, 2004, file no. 001-11680). |
4.40
|
|
Indenture dated as of March 24, 2003 by and among GulfTerra
Energy Partners, L.P., GulfTerra Energy Finance
Corporation, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee dated as of March 24, 2003
(filed as Exhibit 4.K to GulfTerras Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q dated May 15, 2003); First Supplemental Indenture
dated as of June 30, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 4.K.1 to
GulfTerras 2003 Second Quarter Form 10-Q, file no.
001-11680). |
4.41
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 17, 2004
(filed as Exhibit 4.K.1 to GulfTerras Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on August 19, 2004, file no. 001-11680). |
4.42
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 29,
2005, among Cameron Highway Oil Pipeline Company, the
Lenders party thereto, and SunTrust Bank, as Administrative
Agent and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2005). |
4.43
|
|
Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 1, 2005,
among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer,
Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.46 to Form 10-Q filed November 4,
2005). |
4.44
|
|
Global Note representing $500,000,000 principal amount of
4.95% Senior Notes due 2010 with attached Guarantee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.47 to Form 10-Q
filed November 4, 2005). |
4.45
|
|
Note Purchase Agreement dated as of December 15, 2005 among
Cameron Highway Oil Pipeline Company and the Note
Purchasers listed therein (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed December 21, 2005.) |
10.1
|
|
Transportation Contract between Enterprise Products
Operating L.P. and Enterprise Transportation Company dated
June 1, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
Registration Statement Form S-1/A filed July 8, 1998). |
10.2
|
|
Seventh Amendment to Conveyance of Gas Processing Rights,
dated as of April 1, 2004 among Enterprise Gas Processing,
LLC, Shell Oil Company, Shell Exploration & Production
Company, Shell Offshore Inc., Shell Consolidated Energy
Resources Inc., Shell Land & Energy Company, Shell Frontier
Oil & Gas Inc. and Shell Gulf of Mexico Inc. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed April 26,
2004). |
10.3***
|
|
Enterprise Products 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan, amended
and restated as of April 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference
to Appendix B to Notice of Written Consent dated April 22,
2004, filed April 22, 2004). |
10.4***
|
|
Form of Option Grant Award under 1998 Long-Term Incentive
Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form S-8
Registration Statement, Reg. No. 333-115633, filed May 19,
2004). |
10.5***
|
|
Form of Restricted Unit Grant under the Enterprise Products
1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to Form S-8 Registration Statement, Reg. No.
333-115633, filed May 19, 2004). |
10.6***
|
|
1998 Omnibus Compensation Plan of GulfTerra Energy
Partners, L.P., Amended and Restated as of January 1, 1999
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1998 of GulfTerra Energy
Partners, L.P., file no. 001-11680); Amendment No. 1, dated
as of December 1, 1999 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.8.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2000 of GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P., file no.
001-116800); Amendment |
56
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit* |
|
|
No. 2 dated as of May 15, 2003
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.M.1 to Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 of GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P., file no. 001-11680). |
10.7
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Administrative Services
Agreement by and among EPCO, Inc., Enterprise Products
Partners L.P., Enterprise Products Operating L.P.,
Enterprise Products GP, LLC, Enterprise Products OLPGP,
Inc., Enterprise GP Holdings L.P., EPE Holdings, LLC,
TEPPCO Partners, L.P., Texas Eastern Products Pipeline
Company, LLC, TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited
Partnership, TEPPCO Midstream Companies, L.P., TCTM, L.P.
and TEPPCO GP, Inc. dated August 15, 2005, but effective as
of February 24, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to Form 8-K filed August 22, 2005). |
10.8***
|
|
EPE Unit L.P. Agreement of Limited Partnership
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed by Enterprise GP Holdings L.P.,
Commission file no. 1-32610, on September 1, 2005). |
10.9***
|
|
Enterprise Products Company 2005 EPE Long-Term Incentive
Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to
Amendment No. 3 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (Reg.
No. 333-124320) filed by Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. on
August 11, 2005). |
10.10***
|
|
Form of Restricted Unit Grant under the Enterprise Products
Company 2005 EPE Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Amendment No. 3 to Form S-1
Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-124320) filed by
Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. on August 11, 2005). |
10.11***
|
|
Form of Phantom Unit Grant under the Enterprise Products
Company 2005 EPE Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.30 to Amendment No. 3 to Form S-1
Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-124320) filed by
Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. on August 11, 2005). |
10.12***
|
|
Enterprise Products Company 2005 EPE Long-Term Incentive
Plan, amended and restated as of May 2, 2006 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to the Form 8-K filed by
Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. on May 8, 2006). |
10.13***
|
|
Form of Unit Appreciation Right Grant (EPE Holdings, LLC
Directors) under the Enterprise Products Company 2005 EPE
Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.02 to the Form 8-K filed by Enterprise GP
Holdings L.P. on May 8, 2006). |
10.14***
|
|
Form of Unit Appreciation Right Grant (Enterprise Products
GP, LLC Directors) under the Enterprise Products Company
2005 EPE Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.03 to the Form 8-K filed by
Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. on May 8, 2006). |
10.15
|
|
Waiver of Provisions of the Conflicts Policies and
Procedures of the Third Amended and Restated Administrative
Services Agreement dated February 23, 2006 but effective as
of February 13, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.12 to Form 10-K filed on February 27, 2006). |
18.1
|
|
Letter regarding Change in Accounting Principles dated May
4, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 18.1 to Form |
|
|
10-Q filed May 10, 2004). |
31.1#
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 certification of Robert G.
Phillips for Enterprise Products Partners L.P. for the
March 31, 2006 quarterly report on Form 10-Q. |
31.2#
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 certification of Michael A.
Creel for Enterprise Products Partners L.P. for the March
31, 2006 quarterly report on Form 10-Q. |
32.1#
|
|
Section 1350 certification of Robert G. Phillips for the
March 31, 2006 quarterly report on Form 10-Q. |
32.2#
|
|
Section 1350 certification of Michael A. Creel for the
March 31, 2006 quarterly report on Form 10-Q. |
|
|
|
* |
|
With respect to any exhibits incorporated by reference to any Exchange Act filings, the
Commission file number for Enterprise Products Partners L.P. is 1-14323. |
|
*** |
|
Identifies management contract and compensatory plan arrangements. |
|
# |
|
Filed with this report. |
57
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
the registrant has duly caused this quarterly report on Form 10-Q to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Houston, State of Texas on May 9, 2006.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS L.P. |
|
|
(A Delaware Limited Partnership) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
Enterprise Products GP, LLC, |
|
|
|
|
as General Partner |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By: |
|
/s/ Michael J. Knesek |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Michael J. Knesek |
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Senior Vice President, Controller |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and Principal Accounting Officer |
|
|
|
|
|
|
of the General Partner |
58
Index to Exhibits
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit* |
2.1
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement between Coral Energy, LLC and
Enterprise Products Operating L.P. dated September 22, 2000
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K
filed September 26, 2000). |
2.2
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated January 16, 2002 by and
between Diamond-Koch, L.P. and Diamond-Koch III, L.P. and
Enterprise Products Texas Operating L.P. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed February 8,
2002.) |
2.3
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement dated January 31, 2002 by and
between D-K Diamond-Koch, L.L.C., Diamond-Koch, L.P. and
Diamond-Koch III, L.P. as Sellers and Enterprise Products
Operating L.P. as Buyer (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.2 to Form 8-K filed February 8, 2002). |
2.4
|
|
Purchase Agreement by and between E-Birchtree, LLC and
Enterprise Products Operating L.P. dated July 31, 2002
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.2 to Form 8-K filed
August 12, 2002). |
2.5
|
|
Purchase Agreement by and between E-Birchtree, LLC and
E-Cypress, LLC dated July 31, 2002 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to Form 8-K filed August 12,
2002). |
2.6
|
|
Merger Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2003, by and
among Enterprise Products Partners L.P., Enterprise
Products GP, LLC, Enterprise Products Management LLC,
GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P. and GulfTerra Energy
Company, L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1
to Form 8-K filed December 15, 2003). |
2.7
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Merger Agreement, dated as of August 31,
2004, by and among Enterprise Products Partners L.P.,
Enterprise Products GP, LLC, Enterprise Products Management
LLC, GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P. and GulfTerra Energy
Company, L.L.C. (incorporated by |
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit* |
|
|
reference to Exhibit 2.1
to Form 8-K filed September 7, 2004). |
2.8
|
|
Parent Company Agreement, dated as of December 15, 2003, by
and among Enterprise Products Partners L.P., Enterprise
Products GP, LLC, Enterprise Products GTM, LLC, El Paso
Corporation, Sabine River Investors I, L.L.C., Sabine River
Investors II, L.L.C., El Paso EPN Investments, L.L.C. and
GulfTerra GP Holding Company (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 2.2 to Form 8-K filed December 15, 2003). |
2.9
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Parent Company Agreement, dated as of
April 19, 2004, by and among Enterprise Products Partners
L.P., Enterprise Products GP, LLC, Enterprise Products GTM,
LLC, El Paso Corporation, Sabine River Investors I, L.L.C.,
Sabine River Investors II, L.L.C., El Paso EPN Investments,
L.L.C. and GulfTerra GP Holding Company (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K filed April 21,
2004). |
2.10
|
|
Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company
Agreement of GulfTerra Energy Company, L.L.C., adopted by
GulfTerra GP Holding Company, a Delaware corporation, and
Enterprise Products GTM, LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company, as of December 15, 2003, (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.3 to Form 8-K filed December 15,
2003). |
2.11
|
|
Amendment No. 1 to Second Amended and Restated Limited
Liability Company Agreement of GulfTerra Energy Company,
L.L.C. adopted by Enterprise Products GTM, LLC as of
September 30, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
2.11 to Registration Statement on Form S-4 Registration
Statement, Reg. No. 333-121665, filed December 27, 2004). |
2.12
|
|
Purchase and Sale Agreement (Gas Plants), dated as of
December 15, 2003, by and between El Paso Corporation, El
Paso Field Services Management, Inc., El Paso Transmission,
L.L.C., El Paso Field Services Holding Company and
Enterprise Products Operating L.P. (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 2.4 to Form 8-K filed December 15,
2003). |
3.1
|
|
Fifth Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership
of Enterprise Products Partners L.P., dated effective as of
August 8, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to
Form 8-K filed August 10, 2005). |
3.2
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company
Agreement of Enterprise Products GP, LLC, dated as of
August 29, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1
to Form 8-K filed September 1, 2005). |
3.3
|
|
Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership of
Enterprise Products Operating L.P. dated as of July 31,
1998 (restated to include all agreements through December
10, 2003)(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to Form
8-K filed July 1, 2005). |
3.4
|
|
Certificate of Incorporation of Enterprise Products OLPGP,
Inc., dated December 3, 2003 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 3.5 to Form S-4 Registration Statement, Reg. No.
333-121665, filed December 27, 2004). |
3.5
|
|
Bylaws of Enterprise Products OLPGP, Inc., dated December
8, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.6 to Form
S-4 Registration Statement, Reg. No. 333-121665, filed
December 27, 2004). |
4.1
|
|
Indenture dated as of March 15, 2000, among Enterprise
Products Operating L.P., as Issuer, Enterprise Products
Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and First Union National Bank,
as Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to
Form 8-K filed March 10, 2000). |
4.2
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 22, 2003,
among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer,
Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and
Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Registration
Statement on Form S-4, Reg. No. 333-102776, filed January
28, 2003). |
4.3
|
|
Global Note representing $350 million principal amount of
6.375% Series B Senior Notes due 2013 with attached
Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to
Registration Statement on Form S-4, Reg. No. 333-102776,
filed January 28, 2003). |
4.4
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of February 14,
2003, among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer,
Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and
Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Trustee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 10-K
filed March 31, 2003). |
4.5
|
|
Global Note representing $500 million principal amount of
6.875% Series B Senior Notes due 2033 with attached
Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to Form
10-K filed March 31, 2003). |
4.6
|
|
Global Notes representing $450 million principal amount of
7.50% Senior Notes due 2011 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed January 25, 2001). |
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit* |
4.7
|
|
Form of Common Unit certificate (incorporated by
reference
to Exhibit 4.1 to Registration Statement on Form S-1/A;
File No. 333-52537, filed July 21, 1998). |
4.8
|
|
Contribution Agreement dated September 17, 1999
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit B to Schedule 13D
filed September 27, 1999 by Tejas Energy, LLC). |
4.9
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated September 17, 1999
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit E to Schedule 13D
filed September 27, 1999 by Tejas Energy, LLC). |
4.10
|
|
Unitholder Rights Agreement dated September 17, 1999
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit C to Schedule 13D
filed September 27, 1999 by Tejas Energy, LLC). |
4.11
|
|
Amendment No. 1, dated September 12, 2003, to Unitholder
Rights Agreement dated September 17, 1999 (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed September 15,
2003). |
4.12
|
|
Agreement dated as of March 4, 2005 among Enterprise
Products Partners L.P., Shell US Gas & Power LLC and Kayne
Anderson MLP Investment Company (incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 4.31 to Form S-3 Registration Statement, Reg.
No. 333-123150, filed March 4, 2005). |
4.13
|
|
$750 Million Multi-Year Revolving Credit Agreement dated as
of August 25, 2004, among Enterprise Products Operating
L.P., the Lenders party thereto, Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Administrative Agent, Citibank, N.A. and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Co-Syndication Agents, and Mizuho
Corporate Bank, Ltd., SunTrust Bank and The Bank of Nova
Scotia, as Co-Documentation Agents (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on August 30,
2004). |
4.14
|
|
Guaranty Agreement dated as of August 25, 2004, by
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. in favor of Wachovia
Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent for the
several lenders that are or become parties to the Credit
Agreement included as Exhibit 4.13, above (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on August 30,
2004). |
4.15
|
|
First Amendment dated October 5, 2005, to Multi-Year
Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of August 25, 2004,
among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., the Lenders party
thereto, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as
Administrative Agent, CitiBank, N.A. and JPMorgan Chase
Bank, as CO-Syndication Agents, and Mizuho Corporate Bank,
Ltd., SunTrust Bank and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as
Co-Documentation Agents (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on October 7, 2005). |
4.16
|
|
$2.25 Billion 364-Day Revolving Credit Agreement dated as
of August 25, 2004, among Enterprise Products Operating
L.P., the Lenders party thereto, Wachovia Bank, National
Association, as Administrative Agent, Citicorp North
America, Inc. and Lehman Commercial Paper Inc., as
Co-Syndication Agents, JPMorgan Chase Bank, UBS Loan
Finance LLC and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as
Co-Documentation Agents, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC,
Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and Lehman Brothers Inc., as
Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book Runners (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on August 30,
2004). |
4.17
|
|
Guaranty Agreement dated as of August 25, 2004, by
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. in favor of Wachovia
Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent for the
several lenders that are or become parties to the Credit
Agreement included as Exhibit 4.16, above (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed on August 30,
2004). |
4.18
|
|
Indenture dated as of October 4, 2004, among Enterprise
Products Operating L.P., as Issuer, Enterprise Products
Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and Wells Fargo Bank, National
Association, as Trustee (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on October 6, 2004). |
4.19
|
|
First Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 4, 2004,
among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer,
Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on October 6,
2004). |
4.20
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 4, 2004,
among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer,
Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on October 6,
2004). |
4.21
|
|
Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 4, 2004,
among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer,
Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K filed on October 6,
2004). |
4.22
|
|
Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated as of October 4, 2004,
among Enterprise Products Operating |
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit* |
|
|
L.P., as Issuer,
Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.5 to Form 8-K filed on October 6,
2004). |
4.23
|
|
Global Note representing $500 million principal amount of
4.000% Series B Senior Notes due 2007 with attached
Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.14 to
Form S-3 Registration Statement Reg. No. 333-123150 filed
on March 4, 2005). |
4.24
|
|
Global Note representing $500 million principal amount of
5.600% Series B Senior Notes due 2014 with attached
Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.17 to
Form S-3 Registration Statement Reg. No. 333-123150 filed
on March 4, 2005). |
4.25
|
|
Global Note representing $150 million principal amount of
5.600% Series B Senior Notes due 2014 with attached
Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.18 to
Form S-3 Registration Statement Reg. No. 333-123150 filed
on March 4, 2005). |
4.26
|
|
Global Note representing $350 million principal amount of
6.650% Series B Senior Notes due 2034 with attached
Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.19 to
Form S-3 Registration Statement Reg. No. 333-123150 filed
on March 4, 2005). |
4.27
|
|
Global Note representing $500 million principal amount of
4.625% Series B Senior Notes due 2009 with attached
Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.27 to
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004 filed on
March 15, 2005). |
4.28
|
|
Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 2, 2005,
among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer,
Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form 8-K filed on March 3,
2005). |
4.29
|
|
Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated as of March 2, 2005,
among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer,
Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to Form 8-K filed on March 3,
2005). |
4.30
|
|
Global Note representing $250,000,000 principal amount of
5.00% Series B Senior Notes due 2015 with attached
Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.31 to
Form 10-Q filed on November 4, 2005). |
4.31
|
|
Global Note representing $250,000,000 principal amount of
5.75% Series B Senior Notes due 2035 with attached
Guarantee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.32 to
Form 10-Q filed on November 4, 2005). |
4.32
|
|
Registration Rights Agreement dated as of March 2, 2005,
among Enterprise Products Partners L.P., Enterprise
Products Operating L.P. and the Initial Purchasers named
therein (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.6 to Form
8-K filed on March 3, 2005). |
4.33
|
|
Assumption Agreement dated as of September 30, 2004 between
Enterprise Products Partners L.P. and GulfTerra Energy
Partners, L.P. relating to the assumption by Enterprise
Products Partners of GulfTerras obligations under the
GulfTerra Series F2 Convertible Units (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 4.4 to Form 8-K/A-1 filed on October
5, 2004). |
4.34
|
|
Statement of Rights, Privileges and Limitations of Series F
Convertible Units, included as Annex A to Third Amendment
to the Second Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited
Partnership of GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P., dated May
16, 2003 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.B.3 to
Current Report on Form 8-K of GulfTerra Energy Partners,
L.P., file no. 001-11680, filed with the Commission on May
19, 2003). |
4.35
|
|
Unitholder Agreement between GulfTerra Energy Partners,
L.P. and Fletcher International, Inc. dated May 16, 2003
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.L to Current Report
on Form 8-K of GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P., file no.
001-11680, filed with the Commission on May 19, 2003). |
4.36
|
|
Indenture dated as of May 17, 2001 among GulfTerra Energy
Partners, L.P., GulfTerra Energy Finance Corporation, the
Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and the Chase Manhattan
Bank, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to GulfTerras
Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed June 25, 2001,
Registration Nos. 333-63800 through 333-63800-20); First
Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 18, 2002 (filed as
Exhibit 4.E.1 to GulfTerras 2002 First Quarter Form 10-Q);
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of April 18, 2002
(filed as Exhibit 4.E.2 to GulfTerras 2002 First Quarter
Form 10-Q); Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of
October 10, 2002 (filed as Exhibit 4.E.3 to GulfTerras
2002 Third Quarter Form 10-Q); Fourth Supplemental
Indenture dated as of November 27, 2002 (filed as Exhibit
4.E.1 to GulfTerras Current Report on Form 8-K dated |
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit* |
|
|
March 19, 2003); Fifth Supplemental Indenture dated as of January
1, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 4.E.2 to GulfTerras Current
Report on Form 8-K dated March 19, 2003); Sixth
Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 20, 2003 (filed as
Exhibit 4.E.1 to GulfTerras 2003 Second Quarter Form 10-Q,
file no. 001-11680). |
4.37
|
|
Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 17, 2004
(filed as Exhibit 4.E.1 to GulfTerras Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on August 19, 2004, file no. 001-11680). |
4.38
|
|
Indenture dated as of November 27, 2002 by and among
GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P., GulfTerra Energy Finance
Corporation, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee (filed as Exhibit 4.1 to
GulfTerras Current Report of Form 8-K dated December 11,
2002); First Supplemental Indenture dated as of January 1,
2003 (filed as Exhibit 4.1.1 to GulfTerras Current Report
on Form 8-K dated March 19, 2003); Second Supplemental
Indenture dated as of June 20, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 4.1.1
to GulfTerras 2003 Second Quarter Form 10-Q, file no.
001-11680). |
4.39
|
|
Third Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 17, 2004
(filed as Exhibit 4.1.1 to GulfTerras Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on August 19, 2004, file no. 001-11680). |
4.40
|
|
Indenture dated as of March 24, 2003 by and among GulfTerra
Energy Partners, L.P., GulfTerra Energy Finance
Corporation, the Subsidiary Guarantors named therein and
JPMorgan Chase Bank, as Trustee dated as of March 24, 2003
(filed as Exhibit 4.K to GulfTerras Quarterly Report on
Form 10-Q dated May 15, 2003); First Supplemental Indenture
dated as of June 30, 2003 (filed as Exhibit 4.K.1 to
GulfTerras 2003 Second Quarter Form 10-Q, file no.
001-11680). |
4.41
|
|
Second Supplemental Indenture dated as of August 17, 2004
(filed as Exhibit 4.K.1 to GulfTerras Current Report on
Form 8-K filed on August 19, 2004, file no. 001-11680). |
4.42
|
|
Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 29,
2005, among Cameron Highway Oil Pipeline Company, the
Lenders party thereto, and SunTrust Bank, as Administrative
Agent and Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2005). |
4.43
|
|
Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated as of June 1, 2005,
among Enterprise Products Operating L.P., as Issuer,
Enterprise Products Partners L.P., as Guarantor, and Wells
Fargo Bank, National Association, as Trustee (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 4.46 to Form 10-Q filed November 4,
2005). |
4.44
|
|
Global Note representing $500,000,000 principal amount of
4.95% Senior Notes due 2010 with attached Guarantee
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.47 to Form 10-Q
filed November 4, 2005). |
4.45
|
|
Note Purchase Agreement dated as of December 15, 2005 among
Cameron Highway Oil Pipeline Company and the Note
Purchasers listed therein (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.1 to Form 8-K filed December 21, 2005.) |
10.1
|
|
Transportation Contract between Enterprise Products
Operating L.P. and Enterprise Transportation Company dated
June 1, 1998 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to
Registration Statement Form S-1/A filed July 8, 1998). |
10.2
|
|
Seventh Amendment to Conveyance of Gas Processing Rights,
dated as of April 1, 2004 among Enterprise Gas Processing,
LLC, Shell Oil Company, Shell Exploration & Production
Company, Shell Offshore Inc., Shell Consolidated Energy
Resources Inc., Shell Land & Energy Company, Shell Frontier
Oil & Gas Inc. and Shell Gulf of Mexico Inc. (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K filed April 26,
2004). |
10.3***
|
|
Enterprise Products 1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan, amended
and restated as of April 8, 2004 (incorporated by reference
to Appendix B to Notice of Written Consent dated April 22,
2004, filed April 22, 2004). |
10.4***
|
|
Form of Option Grant Award under 1998 Long-Term Incentive
Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to Form S-8
Registration Statement, Reg. No. 333-115633, filed May 19,
2004). |
10.5***
|
|
Form of Restricted Unit Grant under the Enterprise Products
1998 Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 4.3 to Form S-8 Registration Statement, Reg. No.
333-115633, filed May 19, 2004). |
10.6***
|
|
1998 Omnibus Compensation Plan of GulfTerra Energy
Partners, L.P., Amended and Restated as of January 1, 1999
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Form 10-K for
the year ended December 31, 1998 of GulfTerra Energy
Partners, L.P., file no. 001-11680); Amendment No. 1, dated
as of December 1, 1999 (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.8.1 to Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2000 of GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P., file no.
001-116800); Amendment |
|
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
Number |
|
Exhibit* |
|
|
No. 2 dated as of May 15, 2003
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.M.1 to Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 of GulfTerra Energy Partners, L.P., file no. 001-11680). |
10.7
|
|
Third Amended and Restated Administrative Services
Agreement by and among EPCO, Inc., Enterprise Products
Partners L.P., Enterprise Products Operating L.P.,
Enterprise Products GP, LLC, Enterprise Products OLPGP,
Inc., Enterprise GP Holdings L.P., EPE Holdings, LLC,
TEPPCO Partners, L.P., Texas Eastern Products Pipeline
Company, LLC, TE Products Pipeline Company, Limited
Partnership, TEPPCO Midstream Companies, L.P., TCTM, L.P.
and TEPPCO GP, Inc. dated August 15, 2005, but effective as
of February 24, 2005 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.1 to Form 8-K filed August 22, 2005). |
10.8***
|
|
EPE Unit L.P. Agreement of Limited Partnership
(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Current
Report on Form 8-K filed by Enterprise GP Holdings L.P.,
Commission file no. 1-32610, on September 1, 2005). |
10.9***
|
|
Enterprise Products Company 2005 EPE Long-Term Incentive
Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to
Amendment No. 3 to Form S-1 Registration Statement (Reg.
No. 333-124320) filed by Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. on
August 11, 2005). |
10.10***
|
|
Form of Restricted Unit Grant under the Enterprise Products
Company 2005 EPE Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Amendment No. 3 to Form S-1
Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-124320) filed by
Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. on August 11, 2005). |
10.11***
|
|
Form of Phantom Unit Grant under the Enterprise Products
Company 2005 EPE Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.30 to Amendment No. 3 to Form S-1
Registration Statement (Reg. No. 333-124320) filed by
Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. on August 11, 2005). |
10.12***
|
|
Enterprise Products Company 2005 EPE Long-Term Incentive
Plan, amended and restated as of May 2, 2006 (incorporated
by reference to Exhibit 10.01 to the Form 8-K filed by
Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. on May 8, 2006). |
10.13***
|
|
Form of Unit Appreciation Right Grant (EPE Holdings, LLC
Directors) under the Enterprise Products Company 2005 EPE
Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to
Exhibit 10.02 to the Form 8-K filed by Enterprise GP
Holdings L.P. on May 8, 2006). |
10.14***
|
|
Form of Unit Appreciation Right Grant (Enterprise Products
GP, LLC Directors) under the Enterprise Products Company
2005 EPE Long-Term Incentive Plan (incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10.03 to the Form 8-K filed by
Enterprise GP Holdings L.P. on May 8, 2006). |
10.15
|
|
Waiver of Provisions of the Conflicts Policies and
Procedures of the Third Amended and Restated Administrative
Services Agreement dated February 23, 2006 but effective as
of February 13, 2006 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit
10.12 to Form 10-K filed on February 27, 2006). |
18.1
|
|
Letter regarding Change in Accounting Principles dated May
4, 2004 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 18.1 to Form
10-Q filed May 10, 2004). |
31.1#
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 certification of Robert G.
Phillips for Enterprise Products Partners L.P. for the
March 31, 2006 quarterly report on Form 10-Q. |
31.2#
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley Section 302 certification of Michael A.
Creel for Enterprise Products Partners L.P. for the March
31, 2006 quarterly report on Form 10-Q. |
32.1#
|
|
Section 1350 certification of Robert G. Phillips for the
March 31, 2006 quarterly report on Form 10-Q. |
32.2#
|
|
Section 1350 certification of Michael A. Creel for the
March 31, 2006 quarterly report on Form 10-Q. |
|
|
|
* |
|
With respect to any exhibits incorporated by reference to any Exchange Act filings, the
Commission file number for Enterprise Products Partners L.P. is 1-14323. |
|
*** |
|
Identifies management contract and compensatory plan arrangements. |
|
# |
|
Filed with this report. |