e10vq
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES & EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 000-08822
Cavco Industries, Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
|
|
56-2405642 1 |
|
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)
|
|
(IRS Employer Identification Number) |
1001 North Central Avenue, Suite 800, Phoenix, Arizona 85004
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(602) 256-6263
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last year)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer þ Non-accelerated filer o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
As of July 30, 2007, there were 6,421,480 shares of the registrants common stock, $.01 par value,
issued and outstanding.
CAVCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
FORM 10-Q
June 30, 2007
Table of Contents
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1: Financial Statements
CAVCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
14,157 |
|
|
$ |
12,976 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
|
54,400 |
|
|
|
50,900 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
127 |
|
|
|
339 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
9,083 |
|
|
|
8,107 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
13,303 |
|
|
|
13,464 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
2,193 |
|
|
|
2,273 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
4,015 |
|
|
|
3,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
97,278 |
|
|
|
91,989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, at cost: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
6,050 |
|
|
|
6,050 |
|
Buildings and improvements |
|
|
7,138 |
|
|
|
7,029 |
|
Machinery and equipment |
|
|
7,752 |
|
|
|
7,617 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,940 |
|
|
|
20,696 |
|
Accumulated depreciation |
|
|
(8,052 |
) |
|
|
(7,894 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,888 |
|
|
|
12,802 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
67,346 |
|
|
|
67,346 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
177,512 |
|
|
$ |
172,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
2,440 |
|
|
$ |
2,868 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
20,914 |
|
|
|
18,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
23,354 |
|
|
|
21,285 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
13,360 |
|
|
|
12,760 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred Stock, $.01 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized;
No shares issued or outstanding |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock, $.01 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized;
Outstanding 6,421,480 and 6,382,980 shares, respectively |
|
|
64 |
|
|
|
64 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
|
123,839 |
|
|
|
122,868 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
16,895 |
|
|
|
15,160 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
140,798 |
|
|
|
138,092 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
177,512 |
|
|
$ |
172,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1
CAVCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net sales |
|
$ |
37,366 |
|
|
$ |
54,050 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
|
31,926 |
|
|
|
43,431 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
|
5,440 |
|
|
|
10,619 |
|
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
|
3,574 |
|
|
|
4,421 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
1,866 |
|
|
|
6,198 |
|
Interest income |
|
|
671 |
|
|
|
574 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
2,537 |
|
|
|
6,772 |
|
Income tax expense |
|
|
802 |
|
|
|
2,438 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,735 |
|
|
$ |
4,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
6,400,536 |
|
|
|
6,355,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
6,656,460 |
|
|
|
6,641,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
2
CAVCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Dollars in thousands)
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,735 |
|
|
$ |
4,334 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
190 |
|
|
|
232 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
515 |
|
|
|
270 |
|
Share-based compensation expense |
|
|
108 |
|
|
|
293 |
|
Tax benefits from option exercises |
|
|
355 |
|
|
|
75 |
|
Incremental tax benefits from option
exercises |
|
|
(300 |
) |
|
|
(66 |
) |
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
212 |
|
|
|
801 |
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(976 |
) |
|
|
1,255 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
161 |
|
|
|
(1,837 |
) |
Prepaid expenses and other current
assets |
|
|
80 |
|
|
|
641 |
|
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
|
|
2,069 |
|
|
|
(338 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
4,149 |
|
|
|
5,660 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
|
(276 |
) |
|
|
(500 |
) |
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
|
(66,500 |
) |
|
|
(115,000 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of short-term investments |
|
|
63,000 |
|
|
|
110,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(3,776 |
) |
|
|
(5,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
|
|
508 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
Incremental tax benefits from option exercises |
|
|
300 |
|
|
|
66 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
808 |
|
|
|
148 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
1,181 |
|
|
|
808 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
12,976 |
|
|
|
15,122 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
14,157 |
|
|
$ |
15,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid during the period for income taxes |
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
3
CAVCO INDUSTRIES, INC.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2007
(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)
(Unaudited)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements of Cavco Industries, Inc., and its
wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively, the Company or Cavco), have been prepared without
audit pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for
Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of SEC Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America have been
condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations.
In the opinion of management, these statements include all the normal recurring adjustments
necessary to fairly state the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements. The Consolidated
Statements of Operations and Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the interim periods are not
necessarily indicative of the results or cash flows for the full year. The Company suggests that
these Consolidated Financial Statements be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated
Financial Statements and the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on May 22, 2007 (the Form 10-K).
The Companys deferred tax assets primarily result from financial accruals and its deferred
tax liabilities result from excess tax amortization of goodwill.
The Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty
in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48), on April 1, 2007. FIN 48
clarifies the accounting for income taxes, by prescribing a minimum recognition threshold a tax
position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements. FIN 48 also
provides guidance on derecognizing, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting
in interim periods, disclosure and transition. The adoption of FIN 48 had no significant impact on
the Companys results of operations or balance sheet for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 and
required no adjustment to opening balance sheet accounts as of March 31, 2007.
The Company has recorded an insignificant amount of unrecognized tax benefits and there would
be an insignificant effect on the effective tax rate if all unrecognized tax benefits were
recognized. The Company classifies interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in
tax expense.
The Company previously operated as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Centex Corporation (Centex).
On June 30, 2003, Centex distributed 100% of the outstanding shares of the Companys common stock
to the stockholders of Centex. Upon this distribution, Cavco Industries, Inc. became a separate
public company, at which time, the Company became responsible for all U.S. federal, state or local
income tax examinations by tax authorities in our major tax jurisdictions. Consolidated and
separate income tax returns are filed in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in several state
jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to examinations by tax authorities in Arizona and
California for years before fiscal year 2004. Additionally, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS)
has completed its examination of the Companys federal income tax return for fiscal year 2005
resulting with a Revenue Agent Report that indicated no changes; therefore subsequent years, and
the prior fiscal year 2004 still remain subject to examination by the IRS. The Company believes
that its income tax filing positions and deductions will be sustained on audit and do not
anticipate any adjustments that will result in a material change to the Companys financial
position. The total amount of unrecognized tax benefit related to any particular tax position is
not anticipated to change significantly within the next 12 months.
For a description of significant accounting policies used by the Company in the preparation of
its Consolidated Financial Statements, please refer to Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated
Financial Statements in the Form 10-K.
4
2. Composition of Certain Financial Statement Captions
Inventories consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
4,457 |
|
|
$ |
4,943 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
3,113 |
|
|
|
3,001 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
5,733 |
|
|
|
5,520 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
13,303 |
|
|
$ |
13,464 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities consist of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Estimated warranties |
|
$ |
6,828 |
|
|
$ |
6,590 |
|
Customer deposits |
|
|
3,729 |
|
|
|
1,777 |
|
Salaries, wages and benefits |
|
|
2,532 |
|
|
|
3,050 |
|
Accrued volume rebates |
|
|
2,249 |
|
|
|
1,847 |
|
Accrued insurance |
|
|
1,453 |
|
|
|
1,308 |
|
Reserve for repurchase commitments |
|
|
1,000 |
|
|
|
1,100 |
|
Other |
|
|
3,123 |
|
|
|
2,745 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
20,914 |
|
|
$ |
18,417 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Revolving Line of Credit
The Company has a $15 million revolving line of credit facility (RLC) with
JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. which expires on July 31, 2007. As of June 30, 2007, $870 of the line
amount is reserved for an outstanding letter of credit issued for a self-funded workers
compensation program which concluded on September 30, 2006. The Company has not made any draws
under the RLC. The outstanding principal amounts of borrowings under the RLC bear interest at the
Companys election at either the prime rate or the London Interbank Offered Rate plus 1.75%. The
RLC contains certain restrictive and financial covenants, which, among other things, limit the
Companys ability to pledge assets and incur additional indebtedness, and requires the Company to
maintain a certain defined fixed charge coverage ratio. The Company has always maintained
compliance with the RLCs financial covenants. Based on the current capital structure and cash
position of the Company, and as a cost saving measure, the Company does not intend to renew the
line of credit facility past the current expiration date. However, the letter of credit referred
to above will be continued to satisfy the remaining requirements of the concluded workers
compensation program.
5
4. Warranties
Homes are warranted against manufacturing defects for a period of one year commencing at the
time of sale to the retail customer. Estimated costs relating to home warranties are provided at
the date of sale. The Company has recorded a liability for estimated future warranty costs
relating to homes sold based upon managements assessment of historical experience factors and
current industry trends. Activity in the liability for estimated warranties was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Balance at beginning of period |
|
$ |
6,590 |
|
|
$ |
6,850 |
|
Charged to costs and expenses |
|
|
2,098 |
|
|
|
2,239 |
|
Deductions |
|
|
(1,860 |
) |
|
|
(2,039 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at end of period |
|
$ |
6,828 |
|
|
$ |
7,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Contingencies
Repurchase Contingencies The Company is contingently liable under terms of repurchase
agreements with financial institutions providing inventory financing for retailers of its products.
These arrangements, which are customary in the industry, provide for the repurchase of products
sold to retailers in the event of default by the retailer. The risk of loss under these agreements
is spread over numerous retailers. The price the Company is obligated to pay generally declines
over the period of the agreement (generally 18 24 months) and is further reduced by the resale
value of the homes. The maximum amount for which the Company was contingently liable under such
agreements approximated $29,268 at June 30, 2007, without reduction for the resale value of the
homes. The Company applies FASB Interpretation No. 45, Guarantors Accounting and Disclosure
Requirements for Guarantees, Including Indirect Guarantees of Indebtedness to Others, an
interpretation of FASB Statements No. 5, 57, and 107 and a rescission of FASB Interpretation No. 3
(FIN 45) and SFAS No. 5, Accounting for Contingencies (SFAS 5) to account for its liability
for repurchase commitments. Under the provisions of FIN 45, the Company records the greater of the
estimated fair value of the non-contingent obligation or a contingent liability under the
provisions of SFAS 5. The Company recorded an estimated liability of $1,000 at June 30, 2007
related to these commitments.
Legal Matters The Company is party to certain legal proceedings that arise in the
ordinary course and are incidental to its business. Certain of the claims pending against the
Company in these proceedings allege, among other things, breach of contract and warranty, product
liability and personal injury. Although litigation is inherently uncertain, based on past
experience and the information currently available, management does not believe that the currently
pending and threatened litigation or claims will have a material adverse effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations. However, future events or
circumstances currently unknown to management will determine whether the resolution of pending or
threatened litigation or claims will ultimately have a material effect on the Companys
consolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations in any future reporting
periods.
6. Stock-Based Compensation
The Company maintains stock incentive plans whereby stock option grants or awards of
restricted stock may be made to certain officers, directors and key employees. The plans, which
are shareholder approved, permit the award of up to 1,350,000 shares of the Companys common stock,
of which 565,393 shares were still available for grant at June 30, 2007. When options are
exercised, new shares of the Companys common stock are issued. Stock options may not be granted
below 100% of the fair market value of the Companys common stock at the date of grant and
generally expire seven years from the date of grant. Stock options and awards of restricted stock
vest over a three to five-year period. The stock incentive plans provide for accelerated vesting
of stock options and removal of restrictions on restricted stock awards upon a change in control
(as defined in the plans).
6
Effective April 1, 2006, the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of FASB
Statement No. 123 revised 2004, Share-Based Payment (FAS 123(R)), and SEC Staff Accounting
Bulletin No. 107 (SAB 107), using the modified-prospective transition method. Other than
restricted stock awards, no share-based compensation cost had been reflected in net income prior to
the adoption of FAS 123(R) and the results for prior periods have not been restated.
Stock-based compensation expense under FAS 123(R) decreased income before income taxes for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 by approximately $105 and $230, respectively, and
decreased net income for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 by approximately $72 and
$147, respectively. Total compensation cost, including costs related to the vesting of restricted
stock awards, charged against income for the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was
approximately $108 and $293, respectively.
As of June 30, 2007, total unrecognized compensation cost related to stock options was
approximately $424 and the related weighted-average period over which it is expected to be
recognized is approximately 1.97 years.
The following table summarizes the option activity within the Companys stock-based
compensation plans for the three months ended June 30, 2007:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
Average |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average |
|
|
Remaining |
|
|
Aggregate |
|
|
|
Number |
|
|
Exercise |
|
|
Contractual |
|
|
Intrinsic |
|
|
|
of Shares |
|
|
Price |
|
|
Term |
|
|
Value |
|
Outstanding at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
679,830 |
|
|
$ |
15.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
|
38.07 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(38,500 |
) |
|
|
13.20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled or forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
648,830 |
|
|
$ |
16.34 |
|
|
|
3.85 |
|
|
$ |
13,747 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercisable at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
597,705 |
|
|
$ |
15.13 |
|
|
|
3.73 |
|
|
$ |
13,384 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The weighted-average estimated fair value of employee stock options granted during the three
months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 were $13.96 and $15.72, respectively. The total intrinsic
value of options exercised during the three months ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 was approximately
$922 and $190, respectively.
The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model to determine the fair value of
stock options. The determination of the fair value of stock options on the date of grant using an
option-pricing model is affected by the Companys stock price as well as assumptions regarding a
number of complex and subjective variables. These variables include actual and projected employee
stock option exercise behaviors, the Companys expected stock price volatility over the term of the
awards, risk-free interest rate, and expected dividends. The fair values of options granted were
estimated at the date of grant using the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
2007 |
|
2006 |
Volatility |
|
|
33.1 |
% |
|
|
33.0 |
% |
Risk-free interest rate |
|
|
4.8 |
% |
|
|
4.9 |
% |
Dividend yield |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
|
|
0.0 |
% |
Expected option life in years |
|
|
4.75 |
|
|
|
4.25 |
|
The Company estimates the expected term of options granted by using the simplified method as
prescribed by SAB 107. The Company estimates the expected volatility of its common stock taking
into consideration its historical stock price movement, the volatility of stock prices of companies
of similar size with similar businesses to it and its expected future stock price trends based on
known or anticipated events. The Company bases the risk-free interest rate that it uses in the
option pricing model on U.S. Treasury zero-coupon issues with remaining
7
terms similar to the
expected term on the options. The Company does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the
foreseeable future and therefore uses an expected dividend yield of zero in the option-pricing
model. The Company is required to estimate future forfeitures at the time of grant and revise
those estimates in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The
Company uses historical data to estimate pre-vesting option forfeitures and records stock-based
compensation cost only for those awards that are expected to vest. The Company recognizes
share-based compensation expense using the straight-line attribution method.
Restricted stock awards are valued at the closing market value of the Companys common stock
on the date of grant, and the total value of the award is expensed ratably over the service period
of the employees receiving the grants. A summary of restricted stock activity within the Companys
share-based compensation plans and changes for the three months ended June 30, 2007 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Grant-Date Fair Value |
|
Nonvested at March 31, 2007 |
|
|
923 |
|
|
$ |
32.49 |
|
Granted |
|
|
2,104 |
|
|
|
38.02 |
|
Vested |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forfeited |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2007 |
|
|
3,027 |
|
|
$ |
36.34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed based on the weighted-average number of shares of common
stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed based on the
weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period increased by the
weighted-average number of dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding during the period, using
the treasury stock method. The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted
earnings per share.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net income |
|
$ |
1,735 |
|
|
$ |
4,334 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average shares outstanding: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
|
6,400,536 |
|
|
|
6,355,818 |
|
Common stock equivalents treasury stock method |
|
|
255,924 |
|
|
|
285,558 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
|
6,656,460 |
|
|
|
6,641,376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income per share: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
$ |
0.27 |
|
|
$ |
0.68 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted |
|
$ |
0.26 |
|
|
$ |
0.65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There were 1,823 anti-dilutive common stock equivalents excluded from the computation of
diluted earnings per share for the three months ended June 30, 2007. No anti-dilutive common stock
equivalents were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months
ended June 30, 2006.
8. Discontinued Operations
The Company has plans to dispose of certain of its retail sales centers and these operations
are considered discontinued retail operations. Included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance
Sheet are finished goods inventories to be liquidated in conjunction with the disposal of these
retail sales centers of approximately $790 at June 30, 2007. There were no operating losses for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 or 2006 for the stores identified for disposal as the costs
related to the liquidation of inventory were consistent with our expectations of net realizable
values. Net sales for the retail sales centers to be disposed of approximated $855 and $1,432 for
the three month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
8
9. Business Segment Information
The Company operates in two business segments Manufacturing and Retail. Through its
Manufacturing segment, the Company designs and manufactures homes which are sold primarily in the
southwestern United States to a network of dealers which includes Company-owned retail locations
comprising the Retail segment. The Companys Retail segment derives its revenues from home sales
to individuals. The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the
Form 10-K. Retail segment results include retail profits from the sale of homes to consumers but
do not include any manufacturing segment profits associated with the homes sold. Intercompany
transactions between reportable operating segments are eliminated in consolidation. Substantially
all depreciation and capital expenditures are related to the Manufacturing segment. Each segments
results include corporate office costs that are directly and exclusively incurred for the segment.
The following table summarizes information with respect to the Companys business segments for the
periods indicated:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2006 |
|
Net sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
$ |
36,238 |
|
|
$ |
51,568 |
|
Retail |
|
|
2,610 |
|
|
|
4,319 |
|
Less: Intercompany |
|
|
(1,482 |
) |
|
|
(1,837 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated net sales |
|
$ |
37,366 |
|
|
$ |
54,050 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
$ |
2,976 |
|
|
$ |
7,448 |
|
Retail |
|
|
(14 |
) |
|
|
66 |
|
Intercompany profit in inventory |
|
|
78 |
|
|
|
115 |
|
General corporate charges |
|
|
(1,174 |
) |
|
|
(1,431 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated income from
operations |
|
$ |
1,866 |
|
|
$ |
6,198 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
June 30, |
|
|
March 31, |
|
|
|
2007 |
|
|
2007 |
|
Total assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manufacturing |
|
$ |
100,074 |
|
|
$ |
99,833 |
|
Retail |
|
|
4,786 |
|
|
|
4,424 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
72,652 |
|
|
|
67,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total consolidated assets |
|
$ |
177,512 |
|
|
$ |
172,137 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Corporate assets are comprised primarily of cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments
and deferred taxes.
9
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Introduction
The following should be read in conjunction with the Companys Consolidated Financial
Statements and the related Notes that appear in Item 1 of this Report. References to Note or
Notes refer to the Notes to the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements that appear in Item 1
of this Report.
Overview
We are the largest producer of manufactured homes in Arizona and the 8th largest producer of
HUD code manufactured homes in the United States, based on 2006 total home production data
published by Manufactured Home Merchandiser magazine. The Company is also a leading producer of
park model homes and vacation cabins in the United States.
Headquartered in Phoenix, Arizona, the Company designs and produces factory-built homes which
are sold to a network of retailers located primarily in the southwestern United States. As of June
30, 2007, the Company operated three homebuilding facilities located in Arizona and one
manufacturing facility in Texas. The retail segment of the Company operates seven retail sales
locations in Arizona, New Mexico and Texas which offer homes produced by the Company and other
manufacturers to retail customers.
Industry and Company Outlook
The manufactured housing industry continues to operate at historically low production and
shipment levels. The availability of consumer financing for the retail purchase of manufactured
homes and inventory financing for the wholesale distribution chain remains a key issue to be
resolved before marked emergence from the current lows can occur. Progress has also been impeded
by several industry economic challenges including increased land costs and a slowdown in housing
demand in general.
Cavco benefited from robust regional activity in 2005 and during the first half of 2006. In
particular, the Companys wholesale sales in California increased appreciably during that time.
Cavcos results were relatively strong through the first half of 2006, but have declined in each
successive quarter since that time. Industry shipments to California dropped significantly and
Arizona shipments were also down. The Company was affected by declining order rates throughout
most of its fiscal year ended March 31, 2007, and order rates are still low, although they did show
some modest signs of improvement during the first quarter of fiscal 2008 ended June 30, 2007. We
have aggressively managed our production levels and labored diligently throughout this difficult
period to produce positive financial results.
While we cannot determine the particular causes of the slowdown in Cavcos orders, we can
identify market shifts that may have contributed to the decline and that also may be affecting our
competitors who are generally reporting reduced sales activity as well. A slowdown in the
site-built housing industry combined with reported substantial increases in new home inventories
has had a negative influence on activity in manufactured housing.
Site-built home repossessions are also reported to be on the rise. The slowdown of the resale
market for site-built homes has had an adverse impact on the contingency contract process, wherein
manufactured homebuyers must sell their site-built home in order to facilitate the purchase of a
new manufactured home. In addition, many on-site home builders with high inventory levels are
offering attractive incentives to homebuyers, which may create added competition for the
manufactured housing industry.
There have been reports suggesting that site-built lenders have tightened their credit
requirements, specifically in the sub-prime and alt-A (no documentation loans) lending markets.
Further tightening of underwriting standards in the sub-prime and alt-A lending markets could
benefit our industry if it has the effect of shifting homebuyers to the manufactured housing
market. However, we have experienced no discernable benefit from any changes that may have
occurred in underwriting standards.
10
During the current downturn, we expanded our operations into other geographic markets by
opening a plant in Seguin, Texas. This factory builds a variety of products designed specifically
for the Texas and surrounding marketplace. While the factory-built housing market in Texas has
been depressed for several years as well, we believe it is prudent for Cavco to establish a
position in this area, as it has historically been a large market for manufactured housing. Our
efforts in Texas are beginning to gain some traction, as there has been a slight improvement in
Texas shipments recently. To date, the start-up of the Texas plant has negatively affected the
Companys overall gross profit and detracted from the bottom line; however, when production volume
and efficiencies improve, we believe this factory will become a long-term contributor to the
Company.
Company-wide, our products are diverse and tailored to the needs and desires of our customers.
Innovation in housing design is a forte of the Company and we continue to introduce new models at
competitive price points with expressive interiors and exteriors that complement home styles in the
areas in which they are to be located.
In the face of the weak housing environment, we remain optimistic about our long term
prospects as we believe that we are located in attractive geographic markets, we have an excellent
and diverse line of products and we maintain a conservative cost structure which enables us to
build great value into our homes. As the housing sectors climate and circumstances evolve, we
will remain focused on our core competencies of responding quickly to developments in market
demand, the production of high quality homes, and following through with exceptional service.
Results of Operations (Dollars in thousands)
Three months ended June 30, 2007 compared to 2006
Net Sales. Total net sales decreased 30.9% to $37,366 for the three months ended June 30,
2007 compared to $54,050 for the comparable quarter last year.
Manufacturing net sales decreased 29.7% to $36,238 for the three months ended June 30, 2007
from $51,568 for the same period last year. The decrease in net sales was driven by lower incoming
order rates, resulting in a reduced number of total homes sold, comprised of 856 wholesale
shipments in the first quarter of fiscal 2008 versus 1,063 in the same period last year. A greater
proportion of homes sold during the current quarter were single-section and lower-end products,
causing a 12.7% reduction in the average selling price per home, which was $42,334 versus $48,512
for last years first quarter.
Retail net sales decreased $1,709 to $2,610 for the three months ended June 30, 2007 from
$4,319 for the same quarter last year. This decrease in retail sales was driven by a 32.5%
reduction in the overall number of homes sold.
Net Income. Net income decreased 60% to $1,735 for the three months ended June 30, 2007
compared to $4,334 for the comparable quarter last year.
Gross Profit. Gross profit as a percent of sales decreased to 14.6% for the three months
ended June 30, 2007 from 19.6% for the same period last year. The gross profit percentage has been
challenged by lower production volume, a less favorable product mix, and low margin results from
the new Texas plant.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses
decreased 19.2% or $847, to $3,574 or 9.6% of net sales, for the three months ended June 30, 2007
versus $4,421 or 8.2% of net sales, for the same period last year. The decrease was primarily the
result of reduced costs associated with compensation programs tied to profitability and a decrease
in costs influenced by lower sales volume.
Interest Income. Interest income represents income earned on short-term investments and
unrestricted cash and cash equivalents. For a portion of the Companys short-term investments,
interest income is earned on a tax-free basis. Our interest income increased 16.9% to $671 for the
three months ended June 30, 2007 as compared to $574 during the prior year period. The increase
resulted mainly from the Companys larger balance of investable funds.
11
Income Taxes. The effective income tax rate was approximately 32% and 36% for the three month
period ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. The lower income tax rate reflects the effects
of a larger proportion of tax-free interest income noted above, certain state income tax credits
and deductions provided in the American Jobs Creation Act.
Discontinued Retail Operations. The Company has plans to dispose of certain of its retail
sales centers and these operations are considered discontinued retail operations (see Note 8).
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We believe that cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments on hand at June 30, 2007,
together with cash flow from operations, will be sufficient to fund our operations and provide for
growth for the next twelve months and into the foreseeable future. However, depending on our
operating results and strategic opportunities, we may need to seek additional or alternative
sources of financing. There can be no assurance that such financing would be available on
satisfactory terms, if at all. If this financing were not available, it could be necessary for us
to reevaluate our long-term operating plans to make more efficient use of our existing capital
resources. The exact nature of any changes to our plans that would be considered depends on various
factors, such as conditions in the factory-built housing industry and general economic conditions
outside of our control.
Based on the current capital structure and cash position of the Company, and as a cost saving
measure, the Company does not intend to renew its $15 million revolving line of credit facility
with JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A. which expires on July 31, 2007 (see Note 3).
Projected cash to be provided by operations in the coming year is largely dependent on sales
volume. Operating activities provided $4,149 of cash during the three months ended June 30, 2007 as
compared to $5,660 during the same period last year. Cash generated by operating activities for the
current period was mainly derived from operating income before non-cash charges and higher accrued
liabilities primarily due to increased wholesale and Texas retail customer deposits, partially
offset by higher receivable balances pertaining to moderately increased wholesale sales volume.
Cash generated by operating activities in the prior period was primarily derived from operating
income before non-cash charges and the timing of collection of accounts receivable balances
partially offset by higher inventories necessary to ensure the availability of raw materials.
Investing activities required the use of $3,776 of cash during the three months ended June 30,
2007 compared to the use of $5,000 of cash during the same period last year. For the three months
ended June 30, 2007, cash was primarily used to make net purchases of $3,500 of short-term
investments as well as modest plant expansion and normal recurring capital expenditures. During the
three months ended June 30, 2006, cash was primarily used to make net purchases of $4,500 of
short-term investments, combined with $500 in purchases of property, plant and equipment.
Financing activities provided $808 in cash during the three months ended June 30, 2007
resulting from proceeds associated with the issuance of common stock and related incremental tax
benefits upon exercise of stock options under our stock incentive plans.
Critical Accounting Policies
In Part II, Item 7 of our Form 10-K, under the heading Critical Accounting Policies, we have
provided a discussion of the critical accounting policies that management believes affect its more
significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our Consolidated Financial
Statements. Additionally, the Company adopted the provisions of FASB Interpretation No. 48,
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 effective
April 1, 2007, as discussed in Note 1.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (SFAS 157),
which clarifies that the term fair value is intended to mean a market-based measure, not an
entity-specific measure and gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets in
determining fair value. SFAS 157 requires
12
disclosures about (1) the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair
value, (2) the methods and assumptions used to measure fair value, and (3) the effect of fair value
measures on earnings. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007. Management is currently evaluating the impact, if any; SFAS 157
will have on our financial position and results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial
Assets and Financial Liabilities including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, (SFAS 159)
which permits an entity to choose to irrevocably elect fair value on a contract-by-contract basis
as the initial and subsequent measurement attribute for many financial assets and liabilities and
certain other items including insurance contracts. Entities electing the fair value option would be
required to recognize changes in fair value in earnings and to expense upfront cost and fees
associated with the item for which the fair value option is elected. The provisions of SFAS 159 are
effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the
beginning of a fiscal year that begins on or before November 15, 2007, provided the entity also
elects to apply the provisions of SFAS No. 157. Management is currently evaluating the impact, if
any; SFAS 159 will have on its consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash
flows.
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB that are adopted by
the Company as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, management believes
that the impact of recently issued standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
Forward-looking Statements
Forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors, which may cause our
actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from those expressed or
implied by such forward-looking statements. In addition to the Risk Factors described in Part I,
Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Form 10-K, factors that could affect our results and cause them to
materially differ from those contained in the forward-looking statements include, but are not
limited to:
|
|
|
We have incurred net losses in certain prior periods and there can be no assurance that we will
generate income in the future; |
|
|
|
|
We operate in an industry that is currently experiencing a prolonged and significant downturn; |
|
|
|
|
Housing demand and geographic concentration; |
|
|
|
|
A write-off of all or part of our goodwill could adversely affect our operating results and net worth; |
|
|
|
|
The cyclical and seasonal nature of the manufactured housing industry causes our revenues and operating
results to fluctuate, and we expect this cyclicality and seasonality to continue in the future; |
|
|
|
|
Our liquidity and ability to raise capital may be limited; |
|
|
|
|
Tightened credit standards and curtailed lending activity by home-only lenders have contributed to a
constrained consumer financing market; |
|
|
|
|
The availability of wholesale financing for industry retailers is limited due to a reduced number of
floor plan lenders and reduced lending limits; |
|
|
|
|
We have contingent repurchase obligations related to wholesale financing provided to industry retailers; |
|
|
|
|
The manufactured housing industry is highly competitive, and competition may increase the adverse
effects of industry conditions; |
|
|
|
|
If we are unable to establish or maintain relationships with independent retailers who sell our homes,
our sales could decline; |
|
|
|
|
Our results of operations can be adversely affected by labor shortages and the pricing and availability
of raw materials; |
13
|
|
|
If the manufactured housing industry is not able to secure favorable local zoning ordinances, our sales
could decline and our business could be adversely affected; |
|
|
|
|
The loss of any of our executive officers could reduce our ability to execute our business strategy and
could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations; |
|
|
|
|
We may be required to satisfy certain indemnification obligations to Centex Corporation, our
predecessor, or may not be able to collect on indemnification rights from Centex; |
|
|
|
|
We could be responsible for certain tax liabilities if the Internal Revenue Service challenges the
tax-free nature of the share distribution that resulted in us becoming an independent company; |
|
|
|
|
Certain provisions of our organizational documents could delay or make more difficult a change in
control of our company; and |
|
|
|
|
Volatility of stock price. |
We may make additional written or oral forward-looking statements from time to time in filings
with the SEC or in public news releases or statements. Such additional statements may include, but
are not be limited to include, projections of revenues, income or loss, capital expenditures,
acquisitions, plans for future operations, financing needs or plans, the impact of inflation and
plans relating to our products or services, as well as assumptions relating to the foregoing.
Statements in this Report on Form 10-Q, including those set forth in this section, may be
considered forward looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Act of
1934. These forward-looking statements are often identified by words such as estimate,
predict, hope, may, believe, anticipate, plan, expect, require, intend, assume,
and similar words.
Forward-looking statements contained in this Report on Form 10-Q speak only as of the date of
this report or, in the case of any document incorporated by reference, the date of that document.
We do not intend to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement contained in this
Report on Form 10-Q or in any document incorporated herein by reference to reflect changed
assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes to future operating results over
time.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Market risk is the risk of loss arising from adverse changes in market prices and interest
rates. We may from time to time be exposed to interest rate risk inherent in our financial
instruments, but are not currently subject to foreign currency or commodity price risk. We manage
our exposure to these market risks through our regular operating and financing activities. We are
not currently a party to any market risk sensitive instruments that could be reasonably expected to
have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
The Company maintains short-term investments. Short-term investments are comprised of auction
rate certificates which are adjustable-rate securities with dividend rates that are reset by
bidders through periodic Dutch auctions generally conducted every 7 to 35 days by a broker/dealer
on behalf of the issuer. The Company believes these securities are highly liquid investments
through the related auctions; however, the collateralizing securities have stated terms of up to
thirty (30) years. The investment instruments are rated AAA by Standard & Poors Ratings Group, or
equivalent. The Companys investments are intended to establish a high-quality portfolio that
preserves principal, meets liquidity needs, and delivers an appropriate yield in relationship to
the Companys investment guidelines and market conditions. Given the short-term nature of these
investments, and that we have no borrowings outstanding, we do not believe that we are subject to
significant interest rate risk.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The term disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures of a company
that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports
that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) (15 U.S.C.
78a et seq.) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in
the SECs rules and forms. Disclosure controls and
14
procedures include, without limitation, controls
and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the
reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to a member
of companys management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or
persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure
controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). Based upon that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end
of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on 10-Q, our disclosure controls and procedures are
effective in enabling us to record, process, summarize and report information required to be
included in our periodic SEC filings within the required time period.
(b) Changes In Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The term internal control over financial reporting (defined in SEC Rule 13a-15(f)) refers to
the process of a company that is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability
of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
accordance with GAAP.
No change in the Companys internal control over financial reporting occurred during the
fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2007 that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
Information regarding reportable legal proceedings is contained in Part I, Item 3, Legal
Proceedings, in our Form 10-K. The following describes legal proceedings, if any, that became
reportable during the quarter ended June 30, 2007, and, if applicable, amends and restates
descriptions of previously reported legal proceedings in which there have been material
developments during such quarter.
We are party to certain legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course and are incidental
to our business. Certain of the claims pending against us in these proceedings allege, among other
things, breach of contract and warranty, product liability and personal injury. Although litigation
is inherently uncertain, based on past experience and the information currently available,
management does not believe that the currently pending and threatened litigation or claims will
have a material adverse effect on the Companys consolidated financial position, liquidity or
results of operations. However, future events or circumstances currently unknown to management will
determine whether the resolution of pending or threatened litigation or claims will ultimately have
a material effect on our consolidated financial position, liquidity or results of operations in any
future reporting periods.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Report, you should carefully consider
the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors, in our Form 10-K, which could materially
affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in this Report and
in our Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not
currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely
affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
Item 4: Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
On June 26, 2007, the Company held its 2007 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. At the Annual
Meeting, the
stockholders elected Jacqueline Dout to serve as a member of the Board of Directors for a
three-year term. The terms of Joseph H. Stegmayer and Michael H. Thomas will expire in 2008. The
terms of Steven G. Bunger and Jack Hanna will expire in 2009.
15
There were present at the Annual Meeting, in person or by proxy, stockholders of the Company
who were holders of record on May 4, 2007 of 6,129,844 shares of common stock or 96.03% of the
total shares of the outstanding common stock of the Company, which constituted a quorum. Of the
6,382,980 shares entitled to vote in such election, the votes cast were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Election of Directors: |
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Withheld |
Jacqueline Dout
|
|
6,059,633
|
|
70,211 |
At the same meeting, a proposal for the ratification of the selection of Ernst & Young LLP as
independent Auditor of the Company was submitted to the stockholders, and the votes caste were as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Votes For |
|
Votes Against |
|
Abstentions |
|
Nonvotes |
6,123,534
|
|
2,648
|
|
3,664
|
|
253,134 |
Item 6: Exhibits
See Exhibit Index.
All other items required under Part II are omitted because they are not applicable.
16
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cavco Industries, Inc.
|
|
|
Registrant |
|
|
August 1, 2007 |
/s/ Joseph H. Stegmayer
|
|
|
Joseph H. Stegmayer Chairman, |
|
|
President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 1, 2007 |
/s/ Daniel L. Urness
|
|
|
Daniel L. Urness |
|
|
Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
17
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
Exhibit No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
3.1(1)
|
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation |
|
|
|
3.2(2)
|
|
Certificate of Amendment of Restated Certificate of Incorporation |
|
|
|
3.3(3)
|
|
Amended and Restated Bylaws |
|
|
|
10.1*
|
|
Representative Form of Restricted Stock Award Agreement for the
applicable Cavco Industries, Inc. stock incentive plan |
|
|
|
10.2*
|
|
Restricted Stock Award Agreement dated June 1, 2007, by and
between Daniel L. Urness and Cavco Industries, Inc. |
|
|
|
31.1*
|
|
Certification of the Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to
Rule 13-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
|
31.2*
|
|
Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to
Rule 13-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
|
|
|
32**
|
|
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2004 |
|
(2) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2006 |
|
(3) |
|
Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended March 31, 2004 |
|
* |
|
Filed herewith
|
|
** |
|
Furnished herewith |
18